v1.0.0 — initial release

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+---
+license: apache-2.0
+language: en
+size_categories:
+  - 10K<n<100K
+task_categories:
+  - text-classification
+tags:
+  - trading
+  - intent-classification
+  - human-curated
+  - augmented
+  - english
+---
+
+# trade-decision-classifier-v1-dataset
+
+Human-curated + synthetically augmented dataset for training trading-agent reply classifiers. Companion to [DoDataThings/distilbert-trade-decision-classifier-v1](https://huggingface.co/DoDataThings/distilbert-trade-decision-classifier-v1).
+
+## Why this dataset
+
+Trading agents that DM trade proposals to a human reviewer and accept free-form text replies need a way to convert those replies into discrete actions. There's no off-the-shelf dataset for this — sentiment classifiers don't capture the action space, and general intent classifiers don't understand the resize / reprice / defer distinctions specific to trade decisions.
+
+This dataset fills that gap with a balanced, hand-curated 6-label corpus covering canonical replies and adversarial cases. The taxonomy and seeds were iterated against a working trading-agent reply distribution over multiple training cycles.
+
+## TL;DR
+
+- **25,200 training rows** generated by augmenting 1,047 human-written seed phrases via case / punctuation / whitespace and structural-prefix expansion (~24× per seed). Seeds are natural reply phrasings, not LLM-generated text.
+- **175 held-out eval rows**, hand-curated, adversarial-leaning, zero-leakage verified against training.
+- **6 balanced classes** — between 4,080 and 4,608 rows each.
+- **Reproducible** — re-running the generator script with `--seed-rng 42` produces byte-identical output.
+
+## Class distribution
+
+| Label          | Train  | Eval | What it covers |
+| -------------- | ------ | ---- | -------------- |
+| APPROVE        | 4,152  | 30   | Execute as proposed. "yes", "approve", "let's go" |
+| DECLINE        | 4,128  | 30   | Kill the proposal. "no", "pass", "kill it" |
+| HOLD           | 4,152  | 34   | Active deferral. "hold off", "checking", "leaning approve" |
+| COUNTER_SIZE   | 4,080  | 30   | Approve at different share count. "size 10", "dump half" |
+| COUNTER_PRICE  | 4,080  | 25   | Approve at different limit price. "at $49", "limit 50" |
+| UNCLEAR        | 4,608  | 26   | No committable position. Multi-intent, off-topic, ambiguous. |
+
+UNCLEAR is slightly larger because it includes template-generated multi-intent examples using a 100-ticker pool (see Variation dimensions below).
+
+## Schema
+
+Each row is a JSON object:
+
+```json
+{
+  "text": "[dm][reply_to:131967][in_flight:1] Reject!",
+  "label": "DECLINE",
+  "label_id": 1,
+  "seed": "reject"
+}
+```
+
+Fields:
+
+- `text` — the prefixed input fed to the model
+- `label` — string label
+- `label_id` — int [0, 5]
+- `seed` (train only) — original seed phrase, or `_ticker_tmpl_<...>` for template-generated rows
+- `raw_text` (eval only) — original text before prefix wrap
+- `note` (eval only) — curator's category note
+
+Label ID mapping:
+
+```
+{"APPROVE": 0, "DECLINE": 1, "HOLD": 2,
+ "COUNTER_SIZE": 3, "COUNTER_PRICE": 4, "UNCLEAR": 5}
+```
+
+## Structural prefix scheme
+
+Every row's `text` field starts with three tags carrying chat context:
+
+```
+[dm|group][reply_to:N|no_reply_to][in_flight:K]
+```
+
+These give the model context that pure text would not — "yes" with 1 proposal in flight is APPROVE; "yes" with 3 in flight and no quote-reply is structurally ambiguous and trained as UNCLEAR.
+
+The prefix is concatenated into the input string and tokenized as regular subword pieces — no special-token registration required.
+
+## Variation dimensions
+
+Each of the 1,047 human-written seeds expands to ~24 training rows via two stacked variation axes:
+
+**1. Surface variants (6 per seed, randomly sampled):**
+
+- Case: lowercase / title / uppercase / as_is
+- Punctuation: none / `.` / `!` / `?`
+- Whitespace: none / leading 2 spaces / trailing 2 spaces
+
+**2. Structural prefix variants (4 per surface form):**
+
+- `(reply_to: present, in_flight: 1)`
+- `(reply_to: present, in_flight: 2)`
+- `(reply_to: present, in_flight: 3)`
+- `(reply_to: absent, in_flight: 1)` — single-default rule
+
+Additionally, the UNCLEAR class includes **480 template-generated rows** using a 100-ticker pool (mega-caps, ETFs, ADRs, mid-caps, speculative names) and 20 multi-intent templates ("approve {A} not {B}", "yes {A} no {B}", "swap {A} for {B}", etc.). This teaches the model the multi-intent PATTERN across diverse ticker tokens without bias toward any specific ticker. The model generalizes to ticker pairs it has never seen in training.
+
+## Zero-leakage verification
+
+Eval phrases are NEVER present in training:
+
+```python
+import json
+
+training_seeds = set(
+    json.loads(l)["seed"].strip().lower()
+    for l in open("training.jsonl")
+)
+overlaps = sum(
+    1 for l in open("eval.jsonl")
+    if json.loads(l)["raw_text"].strip().lower() in training_seeds
+)
+assert overlaps == 0
+```
+
+This is enforced on every regeneration. The eval set's adversarial value depends on the model learning patterns it can generalize to novel phrasings, not memorizing surface forms.
+
+## Design decisions
+
+**Author-written seeds, not LLM-generated.** The 1,047 seed phrases reflect natural reply phrasings a human would actually type — short, casual, sometimes with typos, sometimes with adjacency to system commands. Seeds were hand-written and iteratively reviewed against eval failures.
+
+**Programmatic augmentation, not LLM expansion.** Surface variation is deterministic — case/punctuation/whitespace flipping plus structural-prefix combinations. No language model generates content. This keeps the dataset auditable and reproducible.
+
+**Six labels with COUNTER_PRICE separated from COUNTER_SIZE.** Earlier prototypes used five labels. The sixth (COUNTER_PRICE) was added because resize ("size 10") and reprice ("at $49") require different downstream extraction — share count vs limit price — and conflating them would force the consumer to disambiguate post-classification.
+
+**Balanced classes by design.** All classes are within 4,080–4,608 rows (~13% spread). Class weighting in training becomes functionally uniform, simplifying the training loss and removing a configuration knob.
+
+**Eval set adversarial-leaning.** The held-out 175 examples lean toward edge cases that surfaced during iterative training — casual register ("yup", "yeppers"), action metaphors ("press the button"), negation-as-deferral ("not now", "dont fire yet"), and multi-intent ambiguity ("yes but actually no"). Easy canonical examples are under-represented in eval intentionally.
+
+## Intended downstream task
+
+Train a classifier that routes short free-form text replies on trade proposals into one of 6 action intents:
+
+```
+APPROVE        execute as proposed
+DECLINE        kill the proposal
+HOLD           defer the decision
+COUNTER_SIZE   execute at a different share count
+COUNTER_PRICE  execute at a different limit price
+UNCLEAR        cannot safely commit (refuse)
+```
+
+The data assumes the consumer pairs the model with a confidence threshold, deterministic safety rails (budget/position limits), and a fallback confirmation mechanism. The dataset is NOT intended for standalone-classifier deployments without those layers.
+
+## Loading
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+ds = load_dataset("DoDataThings/trade-decision-classifier-v1-dataset")
+ds["train"]  # 25,200 rows
+ds["test"]   # 175 rows (held out, used for eval — never trained on)
+```
+
+Or directly:
+
+```python
+import json
+train = [json.loads(l) for l in open("training.jsonl")]
+test  = [json.loads(l) for l in open("eval.jsonl")]
+```
+
+## Trained model
+
+A reference classifier trained on this dataset: [DoDataThings/distilbert-trade-decision-classifier-v1](https://huggingface.co/DoDataThings/distilbert-trade-decision-classifier-v1). Reaches macro F1 0.954 on the held-out eval set with zero high-confidence misclassifications.
+
+## Limitations
+
+- **Surface coverage.** The 1,047 human-written seeds reflect representative reply phrasings curated through 12 training iterations against an adversarial eval set. Real production replies will still exceed seed coverage on long-tail phrasing; expect ~5% of replies to land at the confidence floor and route to confirmation fallback.
+- **Class boundaries on multi-intent inputs** ("approve but cut size") are ambiguous; eval labels reflect a single curator's judgment.
+- The "more shares" eval row is architecturally ambiguous (resize intent without a number) — a model trained on this dataset will correctly emit UNCLEAR rather than COUNTER_SIZE, which is safe behavior but reads as a miss against the eval label.
+- **English-only.** No localization in v1.
+
+## License
+
+Apache 2.0.

eval.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899950][in_flight:1] yeah send it", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "yeah send it", "note": "casual affirm"}
+{"text": "[dm][no_reply_to][in_flight:1] go go go", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "go go go", "note": "triple-go single-default"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899952][in_flight:1] do it now", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "do it now", "note": "urgency variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899953][in_flight:1] let's roll", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "let's roll", "note": "idiom"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899954][in_flight:1] I'm in", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "I'm in", "note": "commit phrase"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899955][in_flight:1] green light", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "green light", "note": "metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899956][in_flight:1] fire away", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "fire away", "note": "metaphor variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899957][in_flight:1] pull the trigger", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "pull the trigger", "note": "metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899958][in_flight:1] execute now", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "execute now", "note": "explicit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899959][in_flight:1] press the button", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "press the button", "note": "metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][no_reply_to][in_flight:1] alright go", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "alright go", "note": "mid-thought"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899961][in_flight:1] yes I'm convinced", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "yes I'm convinced", "note": "elaborated yes"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899962][in_flight:1] we're good", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "we're good", "note": "we're-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899963][in_flight:1] send the order", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "send the order", "note": "explicit action"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899964][in_flight:1] approve approve", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "approve approve", "note": "stutter"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899965][in_flight:1] ya rly", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "ya rly", "note": "casual emphatic"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899966][in_flight:1] yeppers", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "yeppers", "note": "playful yep"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899967][in_flight:1] ya", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "ya", "note": "short variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899968][in_flight:1] yup", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "yup", "note": "yup variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899969][in_flight:1] aye", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "aye", "note": "informal"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899970][in_flight:1] affirmative", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "affirmative", "note": "formal"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899971][in_flight:1] grab it", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "grab it", "note": "grab imperative"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899972][in_flight:1] punch it", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "punch it", "note": "slang"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899973][in_flight:1] send it bro", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "send it bro", "note": "casual address"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899974][in_flight:1] buy", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "buy", "note": "single-word action"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899975][in_flight:1] approve and execute", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "approve and execute", "note": "compound but same-intent"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899976][in_flight:1] good to go", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "good to go", "note": "idiom"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899977][in_flight:1] all good execute", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "all good execute", "note": "compound"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899978][in_flight:1] yes lets do it", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "yes lets do it", "note": "elaborated"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899979][in_flight:1] lgtm send", "label": "APPROVE", "label_id": 0, "raw_text": "lgtm send", "note": "tech lingo"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899980][in_flight:1] nah skip", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "nah skip", "note": "casual + skip"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899981][in_flight:1] no I don't like it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "no I don't like it", "note": "elaborated"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899982][in_flight:1] pass on this", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "pass on this", "note": "specific pass"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899983][in_flight:1] actually nope", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "actually nope", "note": "mind-change"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899984][in_flight:1] no it's risky", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "no it's risky", "note": "decline w/ reason same intent"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899985][in_flight:1] chart isn't clean enough", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "chart isn't clean enough", "note": "context decline"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899986][in_flight:1] don't take it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "don't take it", "note": "imperative"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899987][in_flight:1] scrap it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "scrap it", "note": "scrap variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899988][in_flight:1] ditch it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "ditch it", "note": "ditch variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899989][in_flight:1] nuke it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "nuke it", "note": "slang kill"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899990][in_flight:1] kill", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "kill", "note": "single-word kill"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899991][in_flight:1] nope nope", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "nope nope", "note": "double-nope"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899992][in_flight:1] not interested", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "not interested", "note": "specific"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899993][in_flight:1] walk away", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "walk away", "note": "metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899994][in_flight:1] hard no", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "hard no", "note": "hard prefix"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899995][in_flight:1] absolutely not", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "absolutely not", "note": "emphatic"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899996][in_flight:1] no way", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "no way", "note": "common"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899997][in_flight:1] declining", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "declining", "note": "verbed"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899998][in_flight:1] rejected", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "rejected", "note": "verbed"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:899999][in_flight:1] trash", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "trash", "note": "single-word"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900000][in_flight:1] garbage proposal", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "garbage proposal", "note": "judgmental decline"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900001][in_flight:1] no thx", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "no thx", "note": "abbrev"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900002][in_flight:1] nty", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "nty", "note": "abbrev"}
+{"text": "[dm][no_reply_to][in_flight:1] im out", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "im out", "note": "im-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900004][in_flight:1] opt out", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "opt out", "note": "opt phrase"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900005][in_flight:1] bail", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "bail", "note": "single-word slang"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900006][in_flight:1] dont buy", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "dont buy", "note": "imperative neg"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900007][in_flight:1] hard pass on this one", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "hard pass on this one", "note": "elaborated pass"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900008][in_flight:1] not feeling it", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "not feeling it", "note": "feeling-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900009][in_flight:1] sit this out", "label": "DECLINE", "label_id": 1, "raw_text": "sit this out", "note": "metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900010][in_flight:1] let me look at the chart first", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "let me look at the chart first", "note": "explicit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900011][in_flight:1] still checking", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "still checking", "note": "verbed continuing"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900012][in_flight:1] I need 5 minutes", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "I need 5 minutes", "note": "time-specific"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900013][in_flight:1] hold til open", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "hold til open", "note": "conditional"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900014][in_flight:1] wait until close", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "wait until close", "note": "conditional"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900015][in_flight:1] wait for the pullback", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "wait for the pullback", "note": "conditional"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900016][in_flight:1] after lunch", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "after lunch", "note": "time-deferred"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900017][in_flight:1] end of day", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "end of day", "note": "time-deferred"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900018][in_flight:1] come back to me", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "come back to me", "note": "deferral"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900019][in_flight:1] ping me later", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "ping me later", "note": "deferral"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900020][in_flight:1] standby", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "standby", "note": "imperative"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900021][in_flight:1] stand by", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "stand by", "note": "imperative variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900022][in_flight:1] queue it", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "queue it", "note": "queue metaphor"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900023][in_flight:1] not now", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "not now", "note": "not-now"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900024][in_flight:1] later today", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "later today", "note": "time-vague"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900025][in_flight:1] hmm need to think", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "hmm need to think", "note": "thought-process"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900026][in_flight:1] processing", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "processing", "note": "self-state"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900027][in_flight:1] dont fire yet", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "dont fire yet", "note": "negative-imperative"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900028][in_flight:1] not ready", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "not ready", "note": "readiness"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900029][in_flight:1] checking levels", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "checking levels", "note": "specific action"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900030][in_flight:1] reading the brief", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "reading the brief", "note": "specific action"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900031][in_flight:1] in review", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "in review", "note": "passive variant"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900032][in_flight:1] on it give me a min", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "on it give me a min", "note": "compound"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900033][in_flight:1] hold pls", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "hold pls", "note": "abbrev pls"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900034][in_flight:1] on hold", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "on hold", "note": "passive"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900035][in_flight:1] pls wait", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "pls wait", "note": "abbrev wait"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900036][in_flight:1] dont execute yet", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "dont execute yet", "note": "explicit defer"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900037][in_flight:1] not yet pls", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "not yet pls", "note": "pls-suffixed"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900038][in_flight:1] holding for now", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "holding for now", "note": "ing-form for-now"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900039][in_flight:1] watching", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "watching", "note": "watching state"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900040][in_flight:1] go with 7", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "go with 7", "note": "go-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900041][in_flight:1] do twenty shares", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "do twenty shares", "note": "spelled-out"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900042][in_flight:1] try ten", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "try ten", "note": "try-form spelled"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900043][in_flight:1] only 5", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "only 5", "note": "only-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900044][in_flight:1] just 3 sh", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "just 3 sh", "note": "just-form sh"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900045][in_flight:1] bump it to 25", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "bump it to 25", "note": "bump-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900046][in_flight:1] smaller make it 5", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "smaller make it 5", "note": "compound smaller"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900047][in_flight:1] size 8 please", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "size 8 please", "note": "polite"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900048][in_flight:1] can we do 6", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "can we do 6", "note": "question-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900049][in_flight:1] how about 4 shares", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "how about 4 shares", "note": "how-about"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900050][in_flight:1] try 9", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "try 9", "note": "try numeric"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900051][in_flight:1] change to 12", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "change to 12", "note": "change-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900052][in_flight:1] update to 14", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "update to 14", "note": "update-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900053][in_flight:1] approve at 6", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "approve at 6", "note": "approve-at"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900054][in_flight:1] yes 8 shares", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "yes 8 shares", "note": "yes + size"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900055][in_flight:1] ok 11", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "ok 11", "note": "ok + num"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900056][in_flight:1] go 7 sh", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "go 7 sh", "note": "go + sh"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900057][in_flight:1] trim to 4", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "trim to 4", "note": "trim verb"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900058][in_flight:1] size 6 not 10", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "size 6 not 10", "note": "explicit not-comparison"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900059][in_flight:1] shave it to 4", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "shave it to 4", "note": "shave verb"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900060][in_flight:1] more shares", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "more shares", "note": "more + sh"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900061][in_flight:1] scale down to 5", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "scale down to 5", "note": "scale verb"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900062][in_flight:1] scale up to 25", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "scale up to 25", "note": "scale verb up"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900063][in_flight:1] knock it down to 8", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "knock it down to 8", "note": "knock-down"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900064][in_flight:1] bump up to 20", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "bump up to 20", "note": "bump-up"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900065][in_flight:1] 8 instead", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "8 instead", "note": "instead-suffix"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900066][in_flight:1] size 3", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "size 3", "note": "tiny size"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900067][in_flight:1] max 10", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "max 10", "note": "max-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900068][in_flight:1] min 5", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "min 5", "note": "min-form"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900069][in_flight:1] 100 sh too big do 50", "label": "COUNTER_SIZE", "label_id": 3, "raw_text": "100 sh too big do 50", "note": "compound-counter"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900070][in_flight:1] at $49 instead", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "at $49 instead", "note": "$ explicit + 'instead'"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900071][in_flight:1] trim it at $49", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "trim it at $49", "note": "verb-it + $price"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900072][in_flight:1] exit at $50.25", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "exit at $50.25", "note": "decimal $price"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900073][in_flight:1] sell at $48", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "sell at $48", "note": "verb + $price"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900074][in_flight:1] buy at $42.50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "buy at $42.50", "note": "decimal price"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900075][in_flight:1] $48.75 limit", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "$48.75 limit", "note": "decimal + limit keyword"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900076][in_flight:1] limit at 48", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "limit at 48", "note": "limit keyword no $"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900077][in_flight:1] limit 49.5", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "limit 49.5", "note": "limit + decimal"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900078][in_flight:1] price 49.5", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "price 49.5", "note": "price keyword + decimal"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900079][in_flight:1] price at 49", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "price at 49", "note": "price + at"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900080][in_flight:1] set price to 50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "set price to 50", "note": "set price to"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900081][in_flight:1] change the limit to 49", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "change the limit to 49", "note": "change limit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900082][in_flight:1] move limit higher to 50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "move limit higher to 50", "note": "directional + limit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900083][in_flight:1] bump limit up to 51", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "bump limit up to 51", "note": "bump limit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900084][in_flight:1] drop the limit to 47", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "drop the limit to 47", "note": "drop limit"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900085][in_flight:1] make it $48", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "make it $48", "note": "make it $"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900086][in_flight:1] do it at $49.25", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "do it at $49.25", "note": "do it at $"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900087][in_flight:1] run at $48", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "run at $48", "note": "run at"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900088][in_flight:1] execute it at $50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "execute it at $50", "note": "execute-it at"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900089][in_flight:1] fire it at $49", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "fire it at $49", "note": "fire-it at"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900090][in_flight:1] trim at 49 instead of 48", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "trim at 49 instead of 48", "note": "explicit comparison"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900091][in_flight:1] sell at $48 not $50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "sell at $48 not $50", "note": "not-comparison"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900092][in_flight:1] @$50.25", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "@$50.25", "note": "at-sign + decimal"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900093][in_flight:1] @ $49.50", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "@ $49.50", "note": "at + space + $"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900094][in_flight:1] approve at $49", "label": "COUNTER_PRICE", "label_id": 4, "raw_text": "approve at $49", "note": "approve + at + $"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900095][in_flight:1] approve but only half", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "approve but only half", "note": "multi-intent approve+resize"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900096][in_flight:1] approve and pause", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "approve and pause", "note": "approve + structural"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900097][in_flight:1] looking but probably no", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "looking but probably no", "note": "soft lean"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900098][in_flight:1] leaning towards yes", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "leaning towards yes", "note": "active opinion-forming"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900099][in_flight:1] tempted but not sure", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "tempted but not sure", "note": "tempted soft"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900100][in_flight:1] not sure yet", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "not sure yet", "note": "not-sure"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900101][in_flight:1] ???", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "???", "note": "triple-question"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900102][in_flight:1] what's the entry?", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "what's the entry?", "note": "question-back"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900103][in_flight:1] what's the stop", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "what's the stop", "note": "question-back"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900104][in_flight:1] why this size", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "why this size", "note": "question-back"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900105][in_flight:1] send the chart", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "send the chart", "note": "off-topic request"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900106][in_flight:1] dashboard", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "dashboard", "note": "single-word off-topic"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900107][in_flight:1] any news on this", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "any news on this", "note": "general inquiry"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900108][in_flight:1] how's the portfolio", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "how's the portfolio", "note": "off-topic portfolio"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900109][in_flight:1] k", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "k", "note": "single-letter ambiguous"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900110][in_flight:1] kk", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "kk", "note": "kk ambiguous"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900111][in_flight:1] ...", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "...", "note": "ellipsis"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900112][in_flight:1] yes but actually no", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "yes but actually no", "note": "self-contradiction"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900113][in_flight:1] no wait yes", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "no wait yes", "note": "mind-change-mid"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900114][in_flight:1] ill let you know", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "ill let you know", "note": "future-tense engagement"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900115][in_flight:1] send it but smaller", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "send it but smaller", "note": "approve+counter compound"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900116][in_flight:1] approve the other one", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "approve the other one", "note": "ambiguous referent"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900117][in_flight:1] eh whatever", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "eh whatever", "note": "dismissive ambiguous"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900118][in_flight:1] idk you call it", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "idk you call it", "note": "deferral to agent"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900119][in_flight:1] typing", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "typing", "note": "active engagement state"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900120][in_flight:1] brb thinking", "label": "HOLD", "label_id": 2, "raw_text": "brb thinking", "note": "active deferral"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900121][in_flight:1] uh", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "uh", "note": "filler"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900122][in_flight:1] interesting", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "interesting", "note": "evaluative not decision"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900123][in_flight:1] good setup", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "good setup", "note": "compliment not decision"}
+{"text": "[dm][reply_to:900124][in_flight:1] looks decent", "label": "UNCLEAR", "label_id": 5, "raw_text": "looks decent", "note": "evaluative"}

seeds.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,1194 @@
+# Reply classifier seed vocabulary — Phase 2a
+#
+# These are the canonical surface phrases the model is trained on. The
+# synthetic-data generator (scripts/classifier/gen_synth_data.py) applies
+# programmatic expansion: case variants, punctuation, leading/trailing
+# whitespace, and structural-prefix combinations. ~30 seeds × ~30
+# expansions ≈ ~900 examples per label before LLM-assisted breadth
+# augments the UNCLEAR class.
+#
+# The eval set (eval.jsonl) is held out separately — none of these
+# phrases (or trivial variants thereof) should appear in eval. Winston
+# reviews this file. Anything added here gets multiplied; treat each
+# entry as a representative cluster, not a single phrase.
+#
+# Format:
+#   <LABEL>:
+#     core:        # The canonical phrases. The model must classify these.
+#       - phrase
+#     adversarial: # Borderline phrases that ARE this label despite
+#                  # looking like a neighbor (e.g. "yes go" looks like
+#                  # "yes" + something).
+#       - phrase
+#
+# CROSSCLASS_NEGATIVES is the explicit UNCLEAR class for phrases that
+# LOOK like APPROVE/DECLINE/HOLD/COUNTER_SIZE but aren't safe to commit.
+# These are the hard examples — the model is trained to refuse here.
+
+APPROVE:
+  core:
+    # Canonical affirmations
+    - approve
+    - "yes"
+    - ok
+    - okay
+    - execute
+    - go
+    - do it
+    - send it
+    - confirmed
+    - confirm
+    - proceed
+    - run it
+    - take it
+    - lets go
+    - lgtm
+    - approved
+    - yep
+    - sure
+    - 'y'
+    - go ahead
+    - fire it
+    - ship it
+    # Casual register — similar shape to eval but NOT eval rows
+    - yuppy
+    - yepyep
+    - yes for real
+    - yea
+    - aye aye
+    - we are go
+    - ready to roll
+    - count me in
+    - im on board
+    - im sold
+    - love it
+    - this is it
+    - buy buy buy
+    - lets ride
+    - lets rip
+    - let's send it
+    - lets do it
+    - I like it
+    - looks good
+    - looks great
+    - looks clean
+    # Action-metaphor approves — "fire / press / hit / trigger / punch"
+    - hit the button
+    - trigger it
+    - fire the order
+    - send the trade
+    - punch the order
+    - kick it off
+    - launch it
+    - pop it
+    - smash it
+    # "let's X" cluster — anti-bleed for HOLD's "let's defer"/"let's hold"
+    - let's send
+    - let's send now
+    - let's pull it
+    - let's execute
+    - let's run it
+    - let's take it
+    - let's punch it
+    - lets fire
+    - lets go now
+    - lets do this
+    # Formal / metaphor approves
+    - agreed
+    - concur
+    - confirm yes
+    - go signal
+    - clear to fire
+    - thumbs up
+    - acknowledged
+    # More casual abbrev variants — bridging to "yeppers"/"ya rly"/"yup" eval
+    - yepp
+    - ye
+    - yeahyeah
+    - yarly
+    - ya for sure
+    - sure thing
+    - bet
+    - fasho
+    - heck yes
+    # Action-imperative variants — bridging to "fire away"
+    - fire it off
+    - shoot it
+    - blast it
+    - go now
+    # MORE casual-register expansion — covers "yup"/"yeppers"/"good to go"
+    - yupper
+    - yups
+    - yup yup
+    - sup yup
+    - yep that
+    - yep send
+    - ya all the way
+    - ya for it
+    - yarr
+    - good to send
+    - good to fire
+    - clean to go
+    - clear to go
+    - ready set
+    - we are set
+    # MORE action-metaphor bridges — "press the button"/"pull the trigger"
+    - press it
+    - press it now
+    - push the button
+    - pull it
+    - pull trigger
+    - mash the button
+    - hit it
+    - hit go
+    - hit send
+    # MORE "lgtm" / dev-lingo
+    - lgtm
+    - lgtm fire
+    - lgtm execute
+    - looks good fire
+    - looks good go
+    - clean lgtm
+    - solid lgtm
+    - lgtm fire it
+    # "I'm in" cluster — anti-bleed from HOLD's "count me in"
+    - in for it
+    - im in for it
+    - yes im in
+    - ok im in
+    - imma do it
+    - imma execute
+    - imma send
+    - imma punch it
+    - sign me up
+    - im there
+    - im in on it
+    - im on this
+    - i am in
+    - im in dude
+    - fully in
+    - all the way in
+    # "green light" cluster — APPROVE on go-signal metaphors
+    - green it
+    - lit
+    - light it up
+    - give the green
+    - greenlight it
+    - ok green light
+    - light em up
+    # "rly" / "for real" emphasizers
+    - for real yes
+    - rly
+    - really yes
+    - yes really
+    - for real do it
+    - no really yes
+    - 100% yes
+    - hundred percent
+    # "all in" / "all out" / "full" — execute proposal as-proposed (NOT counter-size)
+    # On an exit proposal: "dump it all" = APPROVE (full exit, the default).
+    # On an entry proposal: "all in" = APPROVE (full entry at proposed size).
+    - all in
+    - all out
+    - dump it all
+    - dump everything
+    - dump all
+    - exit all
+    - exit everything
+    - close it out
+    - close the whole position
+    - send it all
+    - the full thing
+    - full position
+    - yes full
+    - yes 100%
+    - execute fully
+    - execute it all
+    - do the whole thing
+  adversarial:
+    - yes go
+    - yes please
+    - approve it
+    - ok proceed
+    - yeah do it
+    - alright execute
+    - approve this one
+    - approve this
+    - send this one
+    - take this one
+    - lets take it
+
+DECLINE:
+  core:
+    # Canonical negatives
+    - decline
+    - "no"
+    - reject
+    - pass
+    - nope
+    - nah
+    - no thanks
+    - kill it
+    - skip it
+    - cancel it
+    - drop it
+    - decline it
+    - 'n'
+    - hard pass
+    - dont take it
+    - reject this
+    - not taking it
+    - not this one
+    - no thanks not this one
+    - kill the proposal
+    - cancel proposal
+    - skip
+    # Casual / colloquial — similar shape to eval but NOT eval rows
+    - bail out
+    - i am out
+    - im out of this
+    - imma pass
+    - imma bail
+    - skipping this one
+    - not my style
+    - no interest
+    - walking away
+    - no chance
+    - hard pass for me
+    - absolutely no
+    - n t y
+    - no thnx
+    - hard pass here
+    - thumbs down
+    - vetoed
+    # Anti-bleed on "this" / "on this" — keep these explicitly DECLINE
+    # so the model doesn't learn "this" + verb leans HOLD
+    - passing on this one
+    - going to pass on this
+    - reject this one
+    - decline this one
+    - drop this one
+    - kill this one
+    - this one isnt for me
+    - this trade not for me
+    - dropping this trade
+    - abandoning this one
+    - this isnt worth it
+    - fail this trade
+    - kill this trade
+    - drop this trade
+    # "not interested" cluster — anti-UNCLEAR bleed
+    - no interest in this
+    - uninterested
+    - not into it
+    - dont care for it
+    - not feeling this trade
+    # "im out" stubborn — needs more variation in shape
+    - i out
+    - ima out
+    - im out of this trade
+    - outta this
+    - outta this trade
+    - im out yall
+    - ima dip
+    # "nty" / abbreviation variants
+    - n thx
+    - no tnks
+    - notnks
+    - ntk
+    - n thanks
+    # "not interested" / interest-negation — stubborn DECLINE 3 runs running
+    - not into this
+    - not my kind of trade
+    - dont find this interesting
+    - no appeal
+    - not worth my attention
+    - meh decline
+    - meh skip
+    - dull pass
+    # "im out" stubborn — variations the model hasn't seen
+    - im so out
+    - im totally out
+    - im definitely out
+    - peace im out
+    - im done with this
+    - im done here
+    - opting out
+    - tapping out
+    # ─── Balancing additions (msg 908) — DECLINE variety ─────
+    - naw
+    - naw fam
+    - no go
+    - no go on this
+    - not going
+    - not going to do it
+    - wont do it
+    - wont take this
+    - abstain
+    - abstaining
+    - decline this trade
+    - passing on this trade
+    - stepping back
+    - stepping away
+    - i pass
+    - i decline
+    - i reject
+    - i reject this
+    - veto
+    - veto this
+    - veto this trade
+    - booo
+    - boooo
+    - nah dont
+    - nah dont take it
+    - no thanks pass
+    - decline thanks
+    - no for me
+    - no for me thanks
+    - not buying it
+    - not selling on this
+    - this is a no
+    - this is a no go
+    - no this one
+    - decline kill
+    - drop it kill
+    - dumpster fire pass
+    - awful pass
+    - terrible pass
+  adversarial:
+    - actually no
+    - no decline
+    - nah pass
+    - ill pass
+    - not for me thanks
+    - no thanks im out
+    - im not feeling it
+    - this isn't it
+    - doesn't look right
+    - chart looks bad
+    # Stronger "this" anti-bleed — "X this out" / "X this trade" patterns
+    - im sitting this trade out
+    - sitting out this one
+    - leaving this trade
+    - leaving this one
+    - letting this go
+    - letting this one go
+    - throwing this trade away
+    - not pursuing this
+    - not taking this trade
+    - im not taking this one
+    - skipping this trade
+    # "bail" cluster — anti-confusion with APPROVE
+    - bailing
+    - bailing on this
+    - im bailing
+    - gonna bail
+    - bail on this
+    - bail this trade
+    # Single-word destruction verbs — "nuke it" cluster
+    - trash it
+    - torch it
+    - shred it
+    - vaporize it
+    - dump it
+    - chuck it
+    - toss it
+    - junk it
+    - bin it
+    - flush it
+    # Stubborn "sit X out" / "this trade out" reinforcement
+    - sitting out
+    - sittin out
+    - sit it out
+    - going to sit
+    - im sitting
+    - sitting on the sidelines
+    - benching this
+    - benching this one
+    - shelving this
+    - shelving this trade
+
+HOLD:
+  core:
+    # Explicit deferral
+    - hold
+    - hold it
+    - hold this
+    - hold this one
+    - hold this for now
+    - hold on
+    - hold off
+    - let's hold
+    - let's defer
+    - defer
+    - defer this
+    - defer for now
+    - wait
+    - wait on this
+    - not yet
+    - not yet decide
+    # Active state-of-attention (user IS engaged, just not deciding)
+    - let me think
+    - let me look
+    - thinking
+    - lemme think
+    - need to check
+    - need a minute
+    - need to look at chart
+    - bit more time
+    - give me a sec
+    - one moment
+    - looking
+    - looking at it
+    - reading
+    - reading the thesis
+    - reviewing
+    - under review
+    - checking
+    - watching it
+    - monitoring
+    - tracking it
+    - on my radar
+    - parking this
+    - park it
+    - leave it open
+    - sit on it
+    - thinking still
+    - thinking it over
+    - still mulling
+    - let me digest
+    # Future-tense engagement (user committing to return)
+    - ill get back to you
+    - circling back later
+    - ok let me see
+    - one sec
+    - brb
+    - on phone
+    - in a meeting
+    - back in 5
+    - cant talk now
+    - later
+    - tonight
+    - lemme dig in
+    - need a chart
+    - pull it up
+    - resend
+    # Active opinion-forming (user IS taking a "leaning" position)
+    - I think
+    - maybe
+    - leaning yes
+    - leaning approve
+    - leaning that way
+    - probably approve
+    - inclined to take it
+    - lean decline
+    - 50/50
+  adversarial:
+    # Adversarial: APPROVE-shaped tokens that flip on the HOLD modifier
+    - yes on hold
+    - go hold
+    - alright hold
+    - ok hold off
+    - yes hold this
+    # Negation-as-deferral: "dont X yet" is HOLD, not DECLINE
+    - dont buy yet
+    - dont act yet
+    - dont fire it yet
+    - dont send it yet
+    - not ready to commit
+    - wait pls
+    - please wait
+    - not now please
+    - hold please
+    - just wait
+    - lets wait
+    - hold this for a bit
+    - give it a moment
+    # "not X yet/now" cluster — HOLD not DECLINE (active deferral with negation)
+    - not yet now
+    - not for now
+    - not at the moment
+    - not this moment
+    - not ready right now
+    - not now actually wait
+    - this isnt the time
+    # "queue X" cluster — HOLD anti-bleed from DECLINE
+    - queue this
+    - queue this one
+    - queue it up
+    - queue for later
+    - queue this for later
+    - into the queue
+    - put in the queue
+    - add to queue
+    # "checking levels" / level/chart-check HOLD anti-bleed
+    - checking the level
+    - checking key levels
+    - looking at levels
+    - level check
+    - checking the chart
+    - checking key prices
+    - reviewing levels
+    # "ill let you know" / future-update HOLD
+    - ill text back
+    - ill update soon
+    - give me time ill respond
+    - ill ping you
+    - ill follow up
+    # "standby" / "stand by" — APPROVE-confusable HOLD
+    # Run #9 had these classified as APPROVE @ 0.36/0.48
+    - standby for now
+    - stand by for now
+    - standing by
+    - hold standby
+    - just standby
+    - stay
+    - stay tuned
+    - wait standby
+    - on standby
+    # ─── Balancing additions (msg 908) — HOLD variety ─────
+    - hold a moment
+    - hold a minute
+    - hold a sec
+    - give it a sec
+    - give it a min
+    - give it a moment
+    - give me a moment
+    - give me one min
+    - give me two min
+    - give me five min
+    - back soon
+    - back in a few
+    - be right back
+    - moment please
+    - second please
+    - lemme see
+    - lemme look
+    - let me see
+    - let me look it up
+    - look at it later
+    - look later
+    - checking now
+    - verifying
+    - verifying now
+    - thinking about it
+    - thinking on it
+    - thinking through
+    - pondering
+    - pondering it
+    - weighing
+    - weighing options
+    - mulling it over
+    - mulling
+    - contemplating
+    # Time-deferral with numbers — anti-bleed for COUNTER_SIZE
+    - give me 2 minutes
+    - back in 10
+    - wait 5
+    - in 3 mins
+    - 10 mins
+    - back in 15
+    - need a few mins
+    - need 2 minutes
+    # End-of-X time deferrals
+    - tomorrow
+    - after open
+    - after close
+    - by eod
+    - end of week
+    - after the meeting
+    - after this call
+    - first thing tomorrow
+
+COUNTER_SIZE:
+  core:
+    - size 10
+    - size 5
+    - size 20
+    - 10 shares
+    - 15 sh
+    - resize to 10
+    - resize 12
+    - make it 15
+    - do 8
+    - do 5 shares
+    - shares 10
+    - cut to 10
+    - reduce to 5
+    - shrink to 8
+    - half size
+    - half
+    - double
+    - bump to 25
+    - try 12 shares
+    - 7 sh instead
+    - size at 10
+    - resize 15 sh
+    # "min N" / "max N" / "floor N" / "ceiling N" — anti-bleed from time
+    - min 3
+    - max 5
+    - min 8 shares
+    - max 12 sh
+    - minimum 5
+    - maximum 8
+    - floor 5
+    - ceiling 10
+    - cap at 8
+    - cap 10
+    # Dump / trim / load / exit / sell / buy verbs (with numbers or "half")
+    - dump half
+    - dump 50
+    - dump 65
+    - dump some
+    - dump a third
+    - trim half
+    - trim 50
+    - trim some
+    - trim 25
+    - load half
+    - load 50
+    - load up some
+    - load a third
+    - exit half
+    - exit 50
+    - sell half
+    - sell 50
+    - buy half
+    - buy 50
+    # Scale verbs (directional resize)
+    - scale in
+    - scale out
+    - scale in halfway
+    - scale out halfway
+    - scale in to 10
+    - scale out to 5
+    # Quantifier-only ("fewer" / numeric-less) — anti-bleed for "more"/"less" eval rows
+    - fewer
+    - fewer shares
+    - quite a bit less
+    - way more
+    - bit more
+    - try fewer
+  adversarial:
+    - approve at 10 shares
+    - yes but size 10
+    - ok do 5 instead
+    - go with 12
+    # Multi-verb COUNTER_SIZE — verb + size in one phrase
+    - dump half position
+    - dump half the position
+    - trim half position
+    - exit half the position
+    - sell half the position
+    - cut the position to 5
+    - reduce position to 10
+    # "approve at N" / "yes N" / "ok N" — approve + number compound
+    - approve at 5
+    - approve at 8
+    - approve at 12
+    - do it at 7
+    - yes at 8
+    - yes 5
+    - yes 7
+    - yes 12
+    - ok 5
+    - ok 7
+    - ok 12
+    - alright 10
+    - alright 8
+    - yep 9
+    - yep 11
+    - yeah 6
+    # ─── Balancing additions (msg 908) — broader size verbiage ─────
+    # "make it N"
+    - make it 4
+    - make it 6
+    - make it 7
+    - make it 8
+    - make it 9
+    - make it 11
+    - make it 13
+    - make it 16
+    - make it 18
+    # "do N" / "do N shares"
+    - do 4
+    - do 6
+    - do 7
+    - do 9
+    - do 11
+    - do 13
+    - do 14
+    - do 4 shares
+    - do 6 shares
+    - do 7 shares
+    - do 9 shares
+    - do 11 shares
+    # "use N" / "try N"
+    - use 8
+    - use 10
+    - use 12
+    - use 6 shares
+    - try 6
+    - try 11
+    - try 12
+    - try 14
+    - try 8 shares
+    # "go N" / "lets do N"
+    - go 4
+    - go 5
+    - go 6
+    - go 8
+    - go 9
+    - go 11
+    - lets try 6
+    - lets do 9
+    - lets use 10
+    - lets do 5 sh
+    - lets do 6 sh
+    - lets do 8 sh
+    # More "size N" / "N sh" / "N shares"
+    - size 4
+    - size 6
+    - size 7
+    - size 9
+    - size 11
+    - size 13
+    - 4 sh
+    - 6 sh
+    - 9 sh
+    - 11 sh
+    - 13 sh
+    - 4 shares
+    - 6 shares
+    - 9 shares
+    - 11 shares
+    - 13 shares
+    # "actually N" / "N not M"
+    - actually 7
+    - actually 6
+    - actually 12
+    - 5 not 10
+    - 10 not 15
+    - 12 not 20
+    - 8 not 15
+    # "swap/switch/redo at N"
+    - swap to 6
+    - swap to 8
+    - switch to 6
+    - switch to 8
+    - redo at 8
+    - redo at 5
+    # Half / fractional forms (not in eval)
+    - trim to half
+    - cut to half
+    - reduce to half
+    - do half size
+    - do half shares
+    - buy half
+    - sell half
+    - buy 50%
+    - sell 50%
+
+COUNTER_PRICE:
+  # User wants to execute but at a different limit price (not share count).
+  # Positive signals: "$", "limit", "price", "@$N", verb + "at $N".
+  # Disambiguator: presence of $ / keyword pushes to COUNTER_PRICE;
+  # plain number (no $/limit/price) stays COUNTER_SIZE.
+  core:
+    # Dollar-sign explicit
+    - at $49
+    - at $50
+    - at $48
+    - at $42
+    - "@$49"
+    - "@$50"
+    - "@$42"
+    - $49 limit
+    - $50 limit
+    - $42 limit
+    - limit $49
+    - limit $50
+    - price $49
+    - price $50
+    # "limit X" / "price X" — keyword form (no $ needed)
+    - limit 49
+    - limit 50
+    - limit 42
+    - limit at 49
+    - limit at 50
+    - price 49
+    - price 50
+    - set limit at 49
+    - set the limit at 50
+    - raise limit to 50
+    - lower limit to 48
+    - change limit to 50
+    - move limit to 49
+    - new limit 50
+    - bump limit to 50
+    - drop limit to 48
+    # Verb + at + $N (dollar-explicit verb forms)
+    - trim at $49
+    - trim at $50
+    - exit at $50
+    - exit at $49
+    - sell at $49
+    - sell at $50
+    - buy at $42
+    - buy at $43
+    - close at $50
+    - dump at $49
+    - load at $42
+    - trim at $48.50
+    - exit at $49.50
+    - sell at $48.75
+    # "make it $X" / "do it at $X" / "execute at $X"
+    - make it $49
+    - make it $50
+    - do it at $49
+    - do it at $50
+    - run it at $50
+    - execute at $49
+    - execute at $50
+    - fire at $49
+  adversarial:
+    # Verb + at + plain number — relies on verb context to imply price
+    # over size. Eval has "trim at 49" — these should generalize.
+    - trim at 49
+    - trim at 50
+    - exit at 50
+    - sell at 49
+    - close at 50
+    - dump at 49
+    - load at 42
+    # COUNTER_PRICE with typos (mirror trial 5 typo)
+    - trim at 49 insteadd of
+    - exit at 50 insteadd
+    - sell at 49 instaed
+    - change price to 50
+    - new price 49
+    # "raise to $50" / "drop to $48" patterns
+    - raise to $50
+    - drop to $48
+    - raise to 50
+    - drop to 48
+    # ─── Balancing additions (msg 908) — broader $ explicit ─────
+    - at $51
+    - at $52
+    - at $46
+    - at $45
+    - at $44
+    - at $43
+    - at $48
+    - at $47
+    - $51 limit
+    - $52 limit
+    - $47 limit
+    - $46 limit
+    - $45 limit
+    - $44 limit
+    - $48 limit
+    - $48.50 limit
+    - $49.50 limit
+    - $50.25 limit
+    - $50.75 limit
+    - $42.50 limit
+    - $43.25 limit
+    # More limit/price keyword variations
+    - limit 51
+    - limit 52
+    - limit 53
+    - limit 47
+    - limit 46
+    - limit 45
+    - limit 48.5
+    - limit 49.25
+    - limit 50.5
+    - price 51
+    - price 52
+    - price 48
+    - price 47
+    - price 46
+    # Verb + at + $ (more prices, more verbs)
+    - trim at $50
+    - trim at $51
+    - trim at $52
+    - trim at $47
+    - trim at $46
+    - exit at $51
+    - exit at $52
+    - exit at $48
+    - exit at $47
+    - exit at $46
+    - sell at $50
+    - sell at $51
+    - sell at $47
+    - sell at $46
+    - sell at $45
+    - buy at $43
+    - buy at $44
+    - buy at $41
+    - buy at $40
+    - close at $51
+    - close at $48
+    - close at $47
+    - close at $46
+    - dump at $50
+    - dump at $51
+    - dump at $48
+    - dump at $46
+    - load at $43
+    - load at $41
+    - load at $40
+    - load at $44
+    # "the limit" / "the price" forms
+    - raise the limit
+    - lower the limit
+    - tighten the limit
+    - loosen the limit
+    - adjust the limit
+    - move the limit
+    - update the limit
+    - modify the limit
+    - shift the limit
+    - shift limit up
+    - shift limit down
+    - shift to $49
+    - shift to $50
+    - tighten to $48
+    - tighten to $49
+    - loosen to $50
+    - loosen to $51
+    # "rather" / "I want" / "give it" forms
+    - rather at $48
+    - rather at $50
+    - rather $49 limit
+    - I want $49
+    - I want it at $49
+    - I want at $48
+    - give it $49
+    - give it $50
+    # "let's do $X" / "go $X" — bridging APPROVE phrasing
+    - let's do $48
+    - let's do $50
+    - let's do $51
+    - go $49
+    - go $50
+    - go $48
+    # "$X instead" forms — bridging msg 898's "instead of"
+    - $48 instead
+    - $50 instead
+    - $51 instead
+    - $48 instead of 50
+    - $50 instead of 48
+
+CROSSCLASS_NEGATIVES:
+  # These look like a clean label but are NOT safe to auto-commit.
+  # The model is trained to classify all of these as UNCLEAR.
+  # Falls through to Tier 2 confirmation DM.
+  multi_intent:
+    # NB: ticker-bearing multi-intent seeds are NOT here — they are
+    # template-generated in scripts/classifier/gen_synth_data.py via
+    # TICKER_POOL × MULTI_INTENT_TEMPLATES for broader variety than
+    # hand-writing could provide.
+    - yes but cut size in half
+    - approve and pause the others
+    - approve but check the chart first
+    - ok but smaller
+    - decline this and the next one
+  followup_questions:
+    - whats the entry?
+    - whats the stop?
+    - why this size?
+    - what triggered this?
+    - which level?
+    - is the chart still clean?
+    - did the news change?
+  partial:
+    # Pure no-position fillers (NOT active opinion-forming — those are HOLD now)
+    - hmm
+    - not sure
+  offtopic:
+    - nice
+    - cool
+    - thanks
+    - lol
+    - "?"
+    - "??"
+    - whats new
+    - status
+    - dashboard link
+    - any other ideas
+  sarcasm_negation:
+    - sure approve another loser
+    - oh great another one
+    - yeah right
+    - of course not
+    - yeah no
+    - no yeah
+  typo_traps:
+    - aprove
+    - dcline
+    - hodl
+    - holdd
+    - aprove it
+  ambiguous_size:
+    - smaller
+    - bigger
+    - less
+    - more
+    - tighter
+    - looser
+
+UNCLEAR_core:
+  # Genuinely UNCLEAR — no extractable position. User is either asking
+  # for info, off-topic, evaluative without deciding, or expressing pure
+  # filler/noise. State-of-attention phrases ("looking", "brb") moved to
+  # HOLD per the active-deferral framing; THIS pile is the "I'm not even
+  # taking a position to defer" set.
+  core:
+    # Filler / non-committal noise
+    - hm
+    - uhh
+    - umm
+    - hmm ok
+    - ehh
+    - mehhh
+    - dunno
+    - shrug
+    # Requests for info / off-topic
+    - send me the link
+    - what was the price again
+    - did this fire already
+    - is this the same as yesterday
+    - whats the trigger
+    - hows the portfolio
+    - whats new
+    - show me the levels
+    - share the chart
+    - give me the brief
+    - show options chain
+    - pull options
+    - what about iv
+    # Evaluative-not-committal — describing the trade without deciding
+    - nice chart
+    - clean setup
+    - decent risk reward
+    - solid thesis
+    - well structured
+    - thoughtful
+    - good analysis
+    - neat trade
+    - fair setup
+    - reasonable
+    - could work
+    - i see it
+    - i see
+    - intriguing
+    # Multi-intent / self-contradiction — can't safely commit
+    - approve but also wait
+    - yes and then no
+    - do it but not yet
+    - execute then trim
+    - skip and find another
+    - yes wait actually no
+    - approve another not this
+    # Single-letter / two-letter ambiguity — UNCLEAR
+    - j
+    - m
+    - z
+    - p
+    - ohh
+    - aah
+    - ehhh
+    - ok thx
+    # "looks X" evaluative — explicitly not a decision
+    - looks fine
+    - looks alright
+    - looks ok
+    - appears good
+    - seems ok
+    - feels right
+    - this feels solid
+    - looks legit
+    - seems fine
+    - appears solid
+    # "idk" + uncertainty
+    - idk
+    - no idea
+    - im not certain
+    - im torn
+    - couldnt tell you
+    - im undecided
+    - cant decide
+    - havent decided
+    - im split on this
+    # "your call" / "you decide" — handing the decision back to the agent
+    - your call
+    - you call
+    - u decide
+    - you decide
+    - up to you
+    - up to the engine
+    - whatever you think
+    - whatever you decide
+    - agent decides
+    - engine call
+    - your choice
+    - whatever works
+    # "idk + you" compound — CRITICAL safety class.
+    # These all signal "I don't know, the engine should pick" → UNCLEAR.
+    # Run #7 had "idk you call it" → APPROVE @ 0.91 (high-conf wrong commit).
+    - idk you make the call
+    - idk your decision
+    - idk your pick
+    - no clue you decide
+    - no idea you decide
+    - you make the call
+    - you make the choice
+    - make the call yourself
+    - engine pick
+    - bot pick
+    - bot decides
+    - dunno you pick
+    - dunno you decide
+    - idk pick for me
+    - cant decide you pick
+    - whatever the engine wants
+    # Multi-intent / self-contradiction stronger — "no wait yes" @ 0.92 wrong
+    - no actually yes
+    - yes wait no
+    - no then yes
+    - approve actually no
+    - decline actually yes
+    - hold no wait
+    - yes hold no
+    - approve no decline
+    - back and forth on this
+    - flip flopping
+    - mind changed back
+    # Hand-back to bot — alternate "idk you call it" forms
+    - dont know up to you
+    - couldnt decide u pick
+    - you tell me
+    - hard to say you choose
+    - im split agent decide
+    - im torn engine pick
+    # ─── Balancing additions (msg 908) — UNCLEAR variety ─────
+    - uhmm
+    - hmmmm
+    - eh
+    - eh idk
+    - no comment
+    - explain more
+    - tell me more
+    - what does that mean
+    - say again
+    - huh
+    - huh what
+    - wait what
+    - wait i dont follow
+    - lost me
+    - i dont follow
+    - im not following
+    - which is this one