PauChav commited on
Commit
582e2c1
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0c64c0e

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +11 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ The challenge we want to address here is automatically identifying what sections
14
  ## Dataset overview
15
  This dataset is intended to researchers working on natural language processing in French, especially on text classification relying on sequential information.
16
  The dataset contains French court decisions from the Appeal Court and the High Court. A French court decision is generally structured as follows:
 
17
  • Metadata ('En-tête' in French): court, number, date, etc., of the trial. 
Tag: ENTETE
18
  • Parties ('Parties' in French): information about the claimants and defendants 
Tag: PARTIES
19
  • Composition of the court ('Composition de la cour' in French): name of the President of the court, the Clerk, etc. 
Tag: COMPOSITION
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ The dataset contains French court decisions from the Appeal Court and the High C
23
  • Operative part of the judgment ('Dispositif' in French): final decision of the court. 
Tag: DISPOSITIF
24
  Dataset specifications
25
  This dataset containts 12k decisions from:
 
26
  • Direction de l'information légale et administrative: DILA , see documentation here
27
  • Institut national de la propriété industrielle INPI
28
  The decisions have been anonymized by the original sources.
@@ -30,26 +32,35 @@ The decisions have been anonymized by the original sources.
30
  ## Methodology
31
  The dataset has been built automatically by using decisions that contained explicit section titles. We then removed those titles in order to simulate real cases where sections are to be automatically detected given their contents.
32
  In the example below where the label associated with each section is visible, we deleted the second line that explicits the new section.
 
33
  I-MOTIFS Les arguments du juge ...
34
  B-DISPOSITIF Par ces motifs ,
35
  I-DISPOSITIF Condamne M. X aux dépens d' appel .
 
 
36
  Note that for paragraphs related to the pleas in law, they are sometimes mixed with the facts. We have thus decided to gather Facts and Plead in Laws into the same tag.
 
37
  • dataset_with_titles.zip contains the data with explicit titles
38
  • dataset_without_titles.zip contains the data without explicit titles
39
 
40
  ## Format
41
  The dataset uses a JSON format. Each court decision corresponds to a row in the JSON file.
 
42
  Each row contains:
 
43
  • the identifier of the decision: id string
44
  • the labelled text: labelled_text string
45
  • each paragraph block is a paragraph of the decision
46
  • each paragraph block starts with the label of the paragraph, and then get all the tokens of the paragraph
 
47
  Example:
 
48
  I-ENTETE La cour d' appel de Paris
49
  I-COMPOSITION Madame Dupont , Présidente
50
  I-COMPOSITION Monsieur Durand , Greffier
51
  I-PARTIES EDF
52
  I-FAITS ...
 
53
 
54
  ## License
55
  This dataset is under the LUDO v1.0 license, available at this address.
 
14
  ## Dataset overview
15
  This dataset is intended to researchers working on natural language processing in French, especially on text classification relying on sequential information.
16
  The dataset contains French court decisions from the Appeal Court and the High Court. A French court decision is generally structured as follows:
17
+
18
  • Metadata ('En-tête' in French): court, number, date, etc., of the trial. 
Tag: ENTETE
19
  • Parties ('Parties' in French): information about the claimants and defendants 
Tag: PARTIES
20
  • Composition of the court ('Composition de la cour' in French): name of the President of the court, the Clerk, etc. 
Tag: COMPOSITION
 
24
  • Operative part of the judgment ('Dispositif' in French): final decision of the court. 
Tag: DISPOSITIF
25
  Dataset specifications
26
  This dataset containts 12k decisions from:
27
+
28
  • Direction de l'information légale et administrative: DILA , see documentation here
29
  • Institut national de la propriété industrielle INPI
30
  The decisions have been anonymized by the original sources.
 
32
  ## Methodology
33
  The dataset has been built automatically by using decisions that contained explicit section titles. We then removed those titles in order to simulate real cases where sections are to be automatically detected given their contents.
34
  In the example below where the label associated with each section is visible, we deleted the second line that explicits the new section.
35
+ ```
36
  I-MOTIFS Les arguments du juge ...
37
  B-DISPOSITIF Par ces motifs ,
38
  I-DISPOSITIF Condamne M. X aux dépens d' appel .
39
+ ```
40
+
41
  Note that for paragraphs related to the pleas in law, they are sometimes mixed with the facts. We have thus decided to gather Facts and Plead in Laws into the same tag.
42
+
43
  • dataset_with_titles.zip contains the data with explicit titles
44
  • dataset_without_titles.zip contains the data without explicit titles
45
 
46
  ## Format
47
  The dataset uses a JSON format. Each court decision corresponds to a row in the JSON file.
48
+
49
  Each row contains:
50
+
51
  • the identifier of the decision: id string
52
  • the labelled text: labelled_text string
53
  • each paragraph block is a paragraph of the decision
54
  • each paragraph block starts with the label of the paragraph, and then get all the tokens of the paragraph
55
+
56
  Example:
57
+ ```
58
  I-ENTETE La cour d' appel de Paris
59
  I-COMPOSITION Madame Dupont , Présidente
60
  I-COMPOSITION Monsieur Durand , Greffier
61
  I-PARTIES EDF
62
  I-FAITS ...
63
+ ```
64
 
65
  ## License
66
  This dataset is under the LUDO v1.0 license, available at this address.