Datasets:

Modalities:
Image
Text
Libraries:
Datasets
License:
File size: 6,517 Bytes
f33a158
 
 
 
 
44c4357
f33a158
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44c4357
39d46ee
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
# Classification — Leaned vs Straight vs Rejected

- This dataset contains real-world images of electric utility poles labeled into three classes: **"Leaned"**, **"Straight"**, and **"Rejected"**. It is designed for **image-level classification tasks**.
- The dataset complements a previously released object detection dataset focused on bounding-box annotations.
- This module fine-tunes a DINOv2 ViT-B/14 model for **image-level classification** of poles.
- GitHub repo link: [Here](https://github.com/EPDCL/Electrical-Lines-Defect-Detection/tree/main/Pole_LeanedStraight_Defect/Classification)

---

## Dataset Details


### Dataset Description

- **Task:** Image classification (multi-class)
- **Classes:** `Leaned`, `Straight`, `Rejected`
- **Image format:** `.jpg`
- **Label format:** Folder-based (one folder per class)

The images were collected by field linemen across three districts in Andhra Pradesh: **Visakhapatnam**, **Eluru**, and **Kakinada**. Each image was labeled by three annotators, with the final label selected via **majority vote**.

- **Curated by:** Sampath Balaji & team, at APEPDCL
- **Funded by:** Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited (APEPDCL)
- **License:** CC BY 4.0
- **Language(s):** Not applicable

## Uses
  
### Direct Use

This dataset is intended for training and evaluating machine learning models that classify pole alignment from real-world utility inspection photos.

### Out-of-Scope Use

- Surveillance, identity detection, or person-tracking
- Facial recognition or biometrics
- Applications requiring highly controlled camera perspectives

## Dataset Structure

The dataset is organized into pre-split folders:
```
Poles_LeanedStraight/Classification/
├── train/
│ ├── Leaned/
│ ├── Straight/
│ └── Rejected/
├── val/
│ ├── Leaned/
│ ├── Straight/
│ └── Rejected/
├── test/
│ ├── Leaned/
│ ├── Straight/
│ └── Rejected/
```
- `Rejected` indicates poles/images that were ambiguous or pole bottom or top was not visible or unusable for downstream tasks but still part of this classification problem.
- No augmentations were applied.
- Each split is approximately: **Train 75%**, **Val 15%**, **Test 10%**

## Dataset Creation

### Curation Rationale

This dataset was created to build an ML pipeline for real-time defect detection in utility poles, starting with identifying leaned poles as a foundational task. The aim is to build an electrical line quality monitoring system to revolutionize maintenance workflows.

### Source Data

#### Data Collection and Processing

Images were collected using mobile cameras by field linemen in Andhra Pradesh.

#### Image Capture Protocol

The images were captured on the ground by APEPDCL linemen following a field protocol designed to reduce bias and ensure consistency:

- Linemen were instructed to **hold the phone upright and parallel to the pole** to avoid tilt or skew that could distort the pole's perceived angle.
- Images were to include both the **top and bottom of the pole**, as full visibility is essential for lean classification.
- **No filters or enhancements** were applied during capture.

Despite this protocol, many images were captured with a **tilted horizon**, making it difficult to determine if a pole was leaned or not. Tools like **Google Photos** and **Adobe Lightroom** were used to **manually correct tilt** by straightening the horizon.

To prevent this in future data, the team identified an open-source camera app, **[Open Camera](https://opencamera.org.uk/)**, which uses the phone’s **gyroscope sensor to auto-straighten images**. This app is now recommended for field use to ensure more consistent alignment.

#### Observations and Future Protocol Improvements

During annotation, a key insight emerged:

- When images were taken **too close to the pole**, **perspective distortion** made it harder to determine pole alignment.
- Going forward, linemen will be instructed to **stand approximately one pole height away** to reduce distortion and improve labeling accuracy.

#### Who are the source data producers?

Electric linemen from APEPDCL working in Visakhapatnam, Eluru, and Kakinada districts of Andhra Pradesh, India.

### Annotations

#### Labeling Process
Images were individually labeled by 3 human labelers and saved in folder-based structure. **Majority vote** was used to determine the final class label. The team worked to maintain consistency, though **some labeling errors may persist due to the manual nature** of the task.

#### Who are the annotators?

The annotation team consisted of project members:  
- Srija Vanapalli  
- Krishna Sumwith  
- Jyotsna Adari  
Under the direction of the team lead.


#### Personal and Sensitive Information

No personal or sensitive data was intentionally included. However, some images may contain **people or faces captured incidentally** in public areas, as the data was collected in outdoor settings.

## Bias, Risks, and Limitations

- **Geographic bias:** All data comes from Andhra Pradesh, India — results may not generalize to other regions or environments.
- **Scene/perspective bias:** Variation in camera angles and distances may affect model training.
- **Privacy risk:** Images taken in public areas may contain identifiable people.

### Recommendations

- Apply **image normalization or augmentation** techniques to improve generalization.
- Account for **perspective and camera angle** effects during training and evaluation.
- Use ethically and responsibly, especially in systems that affect public infrastructure.

## Validation Accuracy

    - Best Val Acc: 84.14%
    - Hardware used: RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on [JOHNAIC](https://von-neumann.ai)

## Sample Visualizations
<p align="center"> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sampath-balaji/Electrical-Lines-Defect-Detection/refs/heads/main/Pole_LeanedStraight_Defect/Classification/assets/val_viz_ep40.png" width="600"/> </p>

## More Information

Follow-up datasets in this series will include other electrical line and pole defects as part of APEPDCL's Line Quality monitoring project.

## Dataset Card Authors

- [Sampath Balaji](https://github.com/sampath-balaji)

## 📄 License
- [Code](https://github.com/sampath-balaji/EPDCL/tree/main/Pole_LeanedStraight_Defect/ObjectDetection): MIT License
- [Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/EPDCL/Electrical-Lines-Defect-Detection/tree/main/Poles_LeanedStraight/Classification): CC BY 4.0