Datasets:

text
stringlengths
1
10k
label
listlengths
1
3
class
listlengths
1
3
CoT
stringlengths
0
1.36k
Mods, please mute this toxic troll or I'll complain to the useless admins. BTW, this is totally not an alt by Gallowboob.
[ "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 3 ]
The message contains derogatory language ("toxic troll") and a threat ("I'll complain to the useless admins") directed towards an individual (implied to be a moderator). This language and behavior are intended to harm or intimidate the recipient, and as such, it falls under the category of 'Person Directed Abuse'. The ...
I never realized how dumb I was for asking my friends what we should eat without figuring out what meals they had this week and checking the urine/stool for any nutritional deficiencies. Maybe ask how high school treated them as well?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you provided does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message you provided is more of a sarcastic comment...
Because romantization of history, humans like to have a villain and a hero to root against or for, so they put you Wei as the Villain faction, Shu as the good guys and Wu being Wu.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is discussing a common trope in the historical narrative of the Three Kingdoms period in Chinese history, specifically in the context of video games and other media. It's not making personal attacks or expressing hatred towards any specific group or individual. It's simply stating a common p...
I see you haven't heard of the [three-ring shitshow known as Great Awakening.] ([LINK]
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. In this case, the mess...
While the post is a bit silly, I wonder what would be the ratio of people hearing voices or with multiple personality disorder being portrayed as evil/creepy vs portrayed as victims in films? of course film makers are just trying to make money, but stereotypes like these can lead to stigmatization i think having sai...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is expressing concern about the portrayal of individuals with mental health conditions, specifically those with multiple personality disorder, in films. The user acknowledges that filmmakers are primarily motivated by profit, but also notes that such portrayals can contribute to stigmatization. The user fur...
Thread: [LINK] Uncensored thread: [LINK] Background: this was a thread about the time the Powerpuff Girls featured a character based on one of their writers. Apparently the writer, Jake Goldman, didn't actually write the character. The other writers did it as a joke. I only found this out by reading the c...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards a specific group or individual. It is a discussion about a misunderstanding regarding the creation of a character in a cartoon show, and the poster is expressing curiosity about the motives behind the censor...
is it untrue? or is your bais with fox?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "is it untrue? or is your bias with Fox?" is not hate speech because it does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gende...
Thank you for this! On lunch right now will try. Do I just let it sit?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not contain hate speech. Hate speech is typically characterized by expressions of hatred, bias, or discrimination towards a particular group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. The message you've provided is ...
Of course incompetence would be heroic...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Of course incompetence would be heroic..." is not hate speech because it does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin. This me...
Razors are the foundation to the walls of Patriarchy
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Razors are the foundation to the walls of Patriarchy" is not hate speech because it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their identity. Instead, it is a statement that uses a metaphorical or symbolic language to critique and challenge the societal...
Are the food insults related to slurs somehow? I don't get it, can someone explain?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message in question is not hate speech because it does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, the message is asking f...
Except it already was you drooling retard. [LINK]
[ "Identity Directed Abuse", "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1, 3 ]
The message 'Except it already was you drooling retard.' is hate speech of the type 'Identity Directed Abuse' and 'Person Directed Abuse'. 1. Identity Directed Abuse: The message targets the recipient's identity by using derogatory and offensive language, specifically the term 'retard'. This term is considered a slur ...
Ackshually, ***** can't get bachelors because of sexism.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Ackshually, ***** can't get bachelors because of sexism" is not hate speech because it is making a statement about a systemic issue, specifically sexism, that may be preventing a certain group of individuals from achieving a particular educational goal. The message is not attacking or demeaning an individu...
Except it's women that desire children. Can we put forward an initiative that permanently segregates the genders to shut these people up?
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
This message can be considered hate speech of the type 'Affiliation Directed Abuse' because it targets a specific group of people (women) based on their gender and expresses a desire for their segregation, which is a form of discrimination and exclusion. The message also implies that women are the source of a problem (...
I'm from a city east of Atlanta and currently live in the Midwest. I have heard more n-words here than I ever did down south. Most people here have maybe met a handful of minorities in their entire life meanwhile down south my high school was half white and half black.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is a personal anecdote about the speaker's experiences with racial diversity in different regions. It does not explicitly advocate for hate, violence, or discrimination against any racial or ethnic group. Instead, it seems to express surprise and observation about the racial demographics and...
Welcome!
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message 'Welcome!' is not considered hate speech because it is generally a friendly and inclusive greeting intended to make someone feel welcome or at home in a particular place or situation. Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national ...
I wonder if this person has ever tweeted about the #white suicide rate Of course, that wouldn't make her a racist, that would be ridiculous
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it does not explicitly or intentionally promote violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a question about a person's Twitter ac...
Who's more incompetent? The dad who couldn't hit the woman with 39 rounds? Or the woman who failed to kill a single one of the family, and got taken down by a 12 year old?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is a sarcastic commentary on a hypothetical situation, comparing the perceived incompetence of two characters (a father and a woman) in a violent scenario. It does not explicitly target or demean any specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disabili...
The virgin mod apologist vs the chad think-for-yourself
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse", "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2, 3 ]
The message "The virgin mod apologist vs the chad think-for-yourself" can be considered as hate speech under the categories of 'Affiliation Directed Abuse' and 'Person Directed Abuse'. 1. Affiliation Directed Abuse: This type of hate speech targets a group of people based on their affiliations, such as their beliefs, ...
I'm not saying it should ever be used to refer to real trans women. I just think that labeling a term as "offensive" when it's a niche hobbyist term, either in the weebweb or in porn, is a bit strange. I would say it is always offensive if you call someone who is LGBT a trap, but I would also say that if you were refer...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you provided does not contain hate speech. It expresses a personal opinion about the use of the term "trap" in certain contexts, such as in the "weebweb" or in porn, and suggests that the term may not always be offensive in those contexts. The message also acknowledges that using the term to refer to real t...
Hey PKPhyre! Thank you for your submission, unfortunately it has been removed from [subreddit] because: * There is not enough drama to merit an SRD submission. Please wait and see if things develop further, or look for a subthread with more drama. Make sure you're linking with the proper context. Events such...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
This message is a moderation action taken by the moderators of a subreddit, specifically r/SubredditDrama. The message is informing the user, PKPhyre, that their submission to the subreddit has been removed because it does not contain enough drama to warrant a post on the subreddit. The moderators are asking the user t...
Fresh take.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message "Fresh take." does not fit this definition. It is a neutral statement that could be used in a variety of contexts, such...
Yep
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, incites violence against, or discriminates against a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message 'Yep' does not meet any of these criteria. It is a simple affirmative response ...
I kinda want a straight razor, but I am fucking scared of not knowing wtf i'm doing and slicing my face up
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is an expression of fear and inexperience, not hate speech. Hate speech is characterized by the expression of hatred or bias against a particular group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. In this case, the individual is expr...
^f ^^a ^^^g ^^^^g ^^^^^o ^^^^^^t ^^^^^^^n ^^^^^^^^i ^^^^^^^^^g ^^^^^^^^^^g ^^^^^^^^^^^e ^^^^^^^^^^^^r ^h ^^e ^^^y ^^^^t ^^^^^h ^^^^e ^^^r ^^e ^s ^^a ^^^i ^^^^l ^^^^^o ^^^^r ^^^^\( ^^^^g ^^^a ^^y ^f ^^o ^^^r ^^^^p ^^^a ^^y ^^\)
[ "Identity Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1 ]
The message contains repeated use of certain characters (^ and ) to replace letters in the words "hey there's a illegal for pay" and "get out", which makes it difficult to read and understand. The message is also using all caps, which is often used to convey anger or aggression. The message is also using racial slurs, ...
dude, I know, I usually spam dazzle (probably the only hero I know the complete mechanics/role/usage etc), its summer here so I am getting shafted by powercuts and dropping into LP and in LP im playing heros im not so good at coz single draft.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards any specific group or individual. It is a personal statement about the user's gaming habits, their current situation with power cuts, and their temporary struggle with playing heroes they are not as familiar...
irony poisoning
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "irony poisoning" is not considered hate speech because it does not directly attack, threaten, or incite violence against a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Instead, the term "irony poisoning" is a metapho...
good
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message 'good' is not typically considered hate speech, as it is a neutral and positive term. However, in the context of the category 'Affiliation Directed Abuse', it could be interpreted as a form of abuse if it is used in a sarcastic, condescending, or mocking manner towards a specific group or individual based o...
Who Payal ?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message 'Who Payal?' is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes violence, discrimination, or harassment against a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The mess...
I know, right? All of those white males accusing Battle Angel Alita of pandering to SJWs are disgusting. What? No one is accusing Battle Angel Alita or any other female-led movie? Only Captain Marvel? Yeah, nevermind.
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
This message is an example of Affiliation Directed Abuse because it targets a specific group of people (white males) and uses derogatory language to express disdain and contempt towards them. The message is not a neutral statement or a constructive discussion, but rather an attack on a group of people based on their id...
Since ancient times
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Since ancient times" is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that is intended to incite hatred or violence towards a specific group of people based on their race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, or any other characteristic. Hate speech is defined...
I lost a friend this way. She was talking about my exes in front of my boyfriend and not being very nice. So, I virgin shamed her. I was 21. I feel bad now, especially bc I think she's a lesbian but her family was heavily religious.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not meet the criteria for hate speech as it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Instead, it is a personal story about a regrettable action the author t...
I don't even really work here
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "I don't even really work here" is not typically considered hate speech for several reasons: 1. Lack of Discrimination: Hate speech is often characterized by its intent to harm, degrade, or incite hatred against a particular group based on their race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, ...
Are they really cheap? The legal process for H1Bs is.. rather intricate, to put it lightly, and it involves lawyers.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or national origin with the intent to harm, intimidate, or incite violence. Instead, it is discussing the complexity and cost of the legal process for H1B visas, which i...
When a [subreddit] user is bit by a spider
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "When a [subreddit] user is bit by a spider" is not hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it refers to users of a specific online community (a subreddit) and a hy...
It's weird seeing Lawlz white-knighting for phedre but the funny thing is I think it's gonna work. Does she still have functioning ovaries because if so those babies are gonna be busted af. I pity them preemptively.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it does not explicitly target or incite harm against a specific group of people based on their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a humorous and hyperbolic commentary on a specific situation involving two individuals (...
You responded before I finished my edit about power imbalances. I imagine they definitely come hand in hand with a lot of incestuous relationships, but like, power imbalances are a thing in *a ton* of non-incestuous relationships as well. I think it's hard to say that it's a problem that is particular to incest betwe...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it does not contain any language that is intended to harm, intimidate, or discriminate against a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or other personal characteristics. Instead, the message is a discussion about the topic o...
Banned for posting in CA. I sure do love Reddit.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not contain any derogatory or discriminatory language towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. 2. It does not incite viol...
Yes
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message 'Yes' is not typically considered hate speech, as it is a simple affirmative response and does not contain any explicit or implicit threats, insults, or derogatory comments directed towards a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender, ...
Ok Author ... You weren't "assigned a gender at birth" ... so forget it. You were **born** with a sex. Male or Female. And don't drag out Intersex ... Intersex conditions are sex-linked. If you believe then you are a sex other than the one you were born as and **don't** experience Dysphoria what are you complaining ...
[ "Identity Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1 ]
The message is hate speech of the type 'Identity Directed Abuse' because it targets and demeans individuals based on their gender identity, which is a fundamental aspect of their identity. The message denies the validity of their gender identity, and uses derogatory and disrespectful language to do so. It also misrepre...
They should be a mod here, unironically.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "They should be a mod here, unironically." is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets an individual or a group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Instead, it is a statement expressing the opinion that ...
Baste
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message "Baste" is not hate speech because it does not target any specific group or individual based on their protected charact...
Hey! Gay White Mexican American here! All the love to you!
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not incite violence, harassment, or discrimination against any specific group or individual. 2. It does not use derogatory or offensive language towards any particular race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity. 3....
Yes, actual, you do. That is how assertions work. You cite the evidence. You don't go "gravity is a government plot to keep women down" and have people believe you without proof, sparkletits.
[ "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 3 ]
The message is considered hate speech of the type 'Person Directed Abuse' because it attacks the person (sparkletits) directly by mocking and belittling them. The message is disrespectful and offensive, and it uses derogatory language to demean the person. The message also implies that the person's beliefs are ridiculo...
Anything to post with that hashtag.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Anything to post with that hashtag" is not considered hate speech because it does not directly incite violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Hate speech is defined a...
Lmao no matter what you say as a man online wahmen will swarm in and gas light you. M E M E G E N D E R E M E G E N D E R
[ "Identity Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1 ]
The message 'Lmao no matter what you say as a man online wahmen will swarm in and gas light you' is hate speech of the type 'Identity Directed Abuse' because it targets a specific group of people (men) based on their gender identity, and it makes a generalization that all women (referred to as 'wahmen') will behave in ...
And now I'm hungry.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, incites violence against, or discriminates against a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message "And now I'm hungry" does not meet any of these criteria. It is a simple statem...
I'm sorry for what you've been through. Your post is a reminder of the lasting damage parents can do. You deserved better.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is an expression of empathy and sympathy towards the recipient, acknowledging their past struggles and offering support. It does not contain any explicit threats, slurs, or incitement to violence, which are common characteristics of hate speech. Instead, it seeks to validate the recipient's ...
The answer is clearly Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice, topic locked.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that targets, threatens, or insults a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it appears to be a statement ab...
Literally any sub that discusses any topic within a 10 mile range of politics
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Literally any sub that discusses any topic within a 10 mile range of politics" is not hate speech because it does not target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it is a general statement about the scope...
Yeah but they groveled and licked admin boots so they were allowed to stay. Bunch of pussies.
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
This message can be considered hate speech of the type 'Affiliation Directed Abuse' because it targets a specific group of people (those who "groveled and licked admin boots") based on their perceived affiliation or association with an authority figure (admin). The message degrades and belittles this group by calling t...
Hey coreywin! Thank you for your submission, unfortunately it has been removed from [subreddit] because: * Surplus Popcorn. Due to a lot of stale politicized drama crowding out niche posts and dominating the front page, certain categories of drama face greater scrutiny and greater rates of removal. Your post f...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
This message is a moderation action taken by the moderators of a specific subreddit, in this case, [subreddit]. It explains that the user's submission has been removed because it falls into a category of "surplus drama" that is subject to greater scrutiny and removal due to the high volume of similar posts and the pote...
ItS CuLtUrAL aPRoPrIaTiON!!!
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "It's Cultural Appropriation!!!" is not hate speech because it is an expression of opinion or criticism, rather than an attack or threat based on someone's race, ethnicity, or national origin. Cultural appropriation refers to the adoption or imitation of elements of one culture by members of another culture...
Wouldn't it being text based possibly point to a female dominant demographic? Erotica seems to primarily be consumed by females after all. Also I might have participated in something like this back when I was a kid for lulz. So some pedo at least got to enjoy a genuine 13 year old's erotica.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards any specific group of people. It is a statement that makes an observation about a potential demographic for text-based erotica and references a historical trend in the consumption of erotica. The mention of ...
On one hand, I delight in seeing hideous scamming trannies go to prison, but on the other I delight in seeing hideous trannies lose their money to scams. 2 buttons guy .jpg
[ "Identity Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1 ]
This message is considered hate speech of the type 'Identity Directed Abuse' because it targets a specific group of people, transgender individuals, with derogatory and harmful language. The use of the term 'hideous scamming trannies' is offensive and dehumanizing, and the speaker seems to take pleasure in the sufferin...
r/atheism and r/bestof are just another r/politics circle jerk
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is a statement of opinion, not a personal attack. It's expressing a viewpoint that the subreddits r/atheism, r/bestof, and r/politics are overly similar in their content and discussion style, and that this similarity is akin to a "circle jerk" - a colloquial term for a group of people engagi...
People need proof because all of these people who claim to be spokesmen for POCs (something I certainly don't appreciate. We can speak for ourselves) make outrageous claims that can't be proven. 'One guy catcalled me at a street?" That means every guy that come across me on the street wants to rape me!" <-- this is ...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it does not explicitly target or attack a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it discusses the issue of privilege and the need for evidence to support claims made by certain ...
Or it's bc they've tried explaining it but most of the ppl they argue w/ don't want to listen. I disagree w/ them bc I like to argue, but I get that it's not for everyone
[ "Counter Speech" ]
[ 4 ]
The message 'Or it's bc they've tried explaining it but most of the ppl they argue w/ don't want to listen. I disagree w/ them bc I like to argue, but I get that it's not for everyone' is not typically classified as hate speech. Hate speech is generally defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group based on rac...
Then why does he comes back? Cause he gets beaten up by our diaspora. World is not safe!
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided appears to be a sarcastic commentary on a situation, rather than a statement intended to incite hatred or violence. It seems to be making a humorous observation about a hypothetical character who keeps returning, only to be met with some form of conflict or opposition from a diaspora (a term...
>Reddit does not like it when a woman admits that she used her sexuality to take advantage of men. yeah just like bill cosby used his sexuality to take advantage of women
[ "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 3 ]
The message is hate speech of the type 'Person Directed Abuse' because it targets a specific group of people (women) and makes a derogatory and harmful statement about them. The message suggests that it is wrong for a woman to use her sexuality to take advantage of men, implying that women who do so are morally corrupt...
I'm sure that was some part. I'm not disagreeing with you. But I don't think it was anywhere near the majority. And as the economy is doing quite well right now, if he wins again, that will be even less of a reason.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not contain hate speech. Hate speech is characterized by expressions of hatred, prejudice, or violence towards individuals or groups based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. In this case, the message is a discussion about ...
Is it a good movie?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message "Is it a good movie?" does not fit this definition because it does not attack or intimidate anyone based on any of these ch...
Lol. All of them are bitching about working in coffee shops. Their only skill is making coffee
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message "Lol. All of them are bitching about working in coffee shops. Their only skill is making coffee" can be considered as Affiliation Directed Abuse because it targets a specific group of people (those who work in coffee shops) and demeans them by implying that they are unskilled and complain too much. The mess...
too real
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "too real" is not considered hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Hate speech is defined as speech...
No, I totally get it and I'm right with you. Just know you aren't alone in that. I don't feel connected at all to the LGBT community for those exact reasons.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not qualify as hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not incite violence, harassment, or discrimination against any specific group, including the LGBT community. 2. It expresses personal feelings and experiences, not generalizations or stereotypes about the LGBT community as a wh...
Lmao, now I have to read through that whole thread. [My favorite so far]([LINK]
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not contain any explicit or implicit threats, slurs, or derogatory comments towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. 2. T...
No... incels are virgins who get so bitter than they don't get laid they start hating women for not having sex with them and other men for getting to have sex. A few went as far as mass shooting/driving a van into a crowd because of their bitterness.
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message is hate speech of the type 'Affiliation Directed Abuse' because it stereotypes and generalizes a group of people (incels) based on their perceived inability to form romantic relationships, and it portrays them in a negative and derogatory manner. The message implies that all incels are bitter, misogynistic,...
And are thus, by proxy, literal white supremacists.
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message 'And are thus, by proxy, literal white supremacists.' is an example of Affiliation Directed Abuse because it targets individuals based on their perceived association or affiliation with a group, in this case, white people. The message accuses the individuals of being white supremacists, a derogatory term as...
Also them: "no one is trying to ruin your life you conspiracy nut"
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not incite violence or harm against a specific group or individual. 2. It does not use derogatory or discriminatory language based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, or...
>SOL Shit Outta' Luck
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "SOL" stands for "Shit Outta Luck," which is a colloquial expression used to indicate that a situation is beyond repair or that someone is in a difficult or unfortunate position. It is not intended to harm, threaten, or discriminate against any specific group of people. Therefore, it is not considered hate ...
Ah, then I'm an apologist!
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Ah, then I'm an apologist!" is not hate speech because it does not meet the criteria for hate speech. Hate speech is generally defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender. In this c...
Liberals calling for violence and defending communism. Think Holodomor deniers and AOC/Bernie as a sub
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided appears to be a political statement, expressing a critical viewpoint about certain individuals and ideologies. It is important to note that freedom of speech is a fundamental right in many democratic societies, and this right includes the ability to express controversial or unpopular opinion...
> that recent study Link?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin. The message you've provided is simply asking ab...
Bad skin Uhhh what do you mean?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Bad skin Uhhh what do you mean?" is not considered hate speech because it does not explicitly target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics with the intention to harm, intimidate, or incite violence. The message is...
You were their hero, and I'll never be able to explain to them why you didn't think I was worth loving, and why they were so easy for you to use as pawns against me. I'll never be able to explain how broken you are, and that it wasn't them, and isn't me that made you do what it is you are doing to them. We're all broke...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
ever be able to escape the guilt. I'll never be able to explain to them why you didn't think I was worth loving, and why they were so easy for you to use as pawns against me. I'll never be able to explain how broken you are, and that it wasn't them, and isn't me that made you do what it is you are doing to them. We're ...
I think Dany is certainly a bit mad. There are flashes of it, in both the books and the show. My guess in the books is that she'll have become more brutal when she returns from her little dragon side-quest (seems to have embraced 'fire and blood'). In the show, it certainly tries to portray her burning of the Tarly...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit threats, slurs, or insults directed towards a specific group or individual based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it expresses an opinion about a fictional character's mental state in a television show, using d...
That's a good attitude to have if you want your Asian restaurants to go out of business.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not necessarily constitute hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. In this case, the message is criticizing a business...
To be frank, I feel like unblocking her would just lead to things getting worse BECAUSE I feel like I'd inevitably wind up blocking her again anyway and it'd make me look even worse. In my experience, when I give people second chances after stuff like this, I tend to be way too lenient, and... well, things tend to go s...
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit or implicit expressions of hatred, discrimination, or violence towards a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it expresses the speaker's pe...
Reddit is gonna get its ass dragged in front of congress
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "Reddit is gonna get its ass dragged in front of congress" is not considered hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. Instead, it is a statement about a specific organization, R...
At first I was upset but then I saw it was that commie YouTube group.
[ "Affiliation Directed Abuse" ]
[ 2 ]
The message "At first I was upset but then I saw it was that commie YouTube group" is an example of Affiliation Directed Abuse because it targets a specific group of people based on their political affiliation (Communists in this case). The term "commie" is a derogatory slur often used to denigrate people who support c...
Mia Khalifas a joke
[ "Person Directed Abuse" ]
[ 3 ]
The message 'Mia Khalifa is a joke' can be considered as hate speech of the type 'Person Directed Abuse' for several reasons: 1. Personal Attack: The message is a direct attack on Mia Khalifa, a specific individual. It implies that she is not worthy of respect or dignity, which is a form of abuse. 2. Degrading Langua...
> **The entire Baby Boom population alive today had the #Measles as kids** Really makes you go
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it is a factual statement about a historical event. The Baby Boom generation refers to the demographic cohort born in the aftermath of World War II, between 1946 and 1964. Measles was a common childhood disease during that time period, and it is likely that many, if not most, memb...
Get a shavette. The investment is about £10. Go gentle to begin with and its easy. I cut myself less with a shavette than I did with a safety razor. Its really not hard and well worth trying.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes violence, discrimination, or hatred towards a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it is a personal recommendation for a shaving ...
I thought Communists were supposed to be for the workers?
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "I thought Communists were supposed to be for the workers?" is not hate speech because it does not incite violence, discrimination, or hatred against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Instead, it is a que...
Am I a power user? but anyway i never understood harassment yesterday i did message a guy who made it about themselves when talking about a shooting that occurred that ddint even involve the person and I pm'd saying that they should make it about the victims instead of themselves and then I got told to fuck off
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message does not contain any explicit or implicit threats, slurs, or derogatory language towards a specific group or individual. It is a statement about a personal interaction and expresses frustration about being told to "fuck off" after trying to correct someone's behavior. While the message may be perceived as a...
Happy Fathers Day
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Happy Father's Day is a common greeting used to express well wishes and appreciation towards fathers on Father's Day, a day dedicated to celebrating fatherhood and the contributions fathers make in our lives. It is not considered hate speech for several reasons: 1. It is a positive and inclusive message: The message i...
I hope it goes to jail
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "I hope it goes to jail" is not typically considered hate speech because it does not directly target or incite harm against a specific individual or group based on their race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics. The message is a common expression of hop...
OP is very angry about MTX. He has a meltdown and proceeds editing all of his comments
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons: 1. It is a statement about a specific individual's (OP) emotional state and actions, not a generalized attack or insult towards a group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characterist...
imagine liking chick fil gay more than popeyes
[ "Identity Directed Abuse" ]
[ 1 ]
The message "imagine liking Chick-fil-A more than Popeyes" does not directly use hate speech. However, it can be interpreted as Identity Directed Abuse when considering the context of the conversation and the implications of the statement. Chick-fil-A has been associated with controversial views on LGBTQ+ rights due t...
Someone should make a t-shirt
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks, threatens, incites violence against, or discriminates against a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. The message "Someone should make a t-shirt" does not meet any of these criteria. It is a si...
For a man that smart that was incredibly stupid
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "For a man that smart that was incredibly stupid" is not typically considered hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender. Instead, it is a criticism of an individual's actions or intel...
all other haircuts look worse interestingly enough. his signature trump style haircut is optimized to the highest degree.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you provided does not appear to be hate speech for several reasons: 1. It does not attack, threaten, or insult a person or group based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender, or sexual orientation. 2. It does not incite violence or promote harm against any individual or gr...
I'm not sure which part is better, the founder showing up at Josh's house to intimidate him or the compound they were building in the desert.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically characterized by expressions of hatred, bias, or discrimination towards a particular group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender, or disability. In this case, the message is...
[LINK] is the new one I think
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "[LINK] is the new one I think" is not hate speech because it does not contain any content that promotes violence, discrimination, or harassment against a specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it app...
Go outside
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
Hate speech is defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message "Go outside" is not hate speech because it does not attack or intimidate anyone based on their protected characteristic...
Of course it was. Disarming the population is the first step to oppressing them. Take away their guns, and then when they can't defend themselves, you can take away any rights you want: free speech, trials, etc. There's a reason the founding fathers put the right to bear arms in the Constitution.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is a political opinion, expressing a viewpoint about the role of gun ownership in maintaining individual rights and freedoms. It is not hate speech because it does not target, attack, or incite harm against any specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religio...
Because when somebody is *right* they're **right.** Even when they don't know what the fuck they're saying.
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is not necessarily hate speech because it does not explicitly target or incite harm against a specific group of people based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Instead, it seems to be a statement about the concept of being right, using...
There will never be a Vicky III
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message "There will never be a Vicky III" is not hate speech because it does not target a specific group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or gender. Instead, it appears to be a statement about a fictional character or series, possibly referring to ...
Linking to a site where we can actually have conversations rather than censorship? BANNED
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you provided does not appear to be hate speech. Hate speech is typically defined as speech that attacks or intimidates a group or individual based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin. The message you provided does not seem to be attacking or int...
And if you tweet about all those things, but not about children dying of starvation in Africa then you're a racist I guess? :)
[ "Neutral" ]
[ 0 ]
The message you've provided is not necessarily hate speech, but it does contain elements that could be perceived as offensive or inflammatory. However, to be considered hate speech, a statement must meet certain criteria, such as: 1. It must be intended to harass, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action a...