InterventionId
int64
UserId
int64
QuestionId_DQ
int64
MessageSequence
int64
IsTutor
int64
MessageString
string
TalkMovePrediction
string
10
749
104,614
1
1
Hello Lina, just wanted to check, you OK?
<None>
10
749
104,614
2
1
You don't have to have help if you don't want it but I am here if you need anything.
<None>
10
-1
104,614
3
0
Hi I would you preferred to be called Lina Chen
null
10
-1
104,614
4
0
I need help
null
10
-1
104,614
5
0
On this question I am a bit stuck at this can you help me please
null
10
-1
104,614
6
0
Thx u
null
10
749
104,614
7
1
Of course, thank you for correcting me on your name, give me a moment to have a look.
<None>
10
-1
104,614
8
0
Ok thank you take your time
null
10
749
104,614
9
1
Do you have any thoughts about what either Alex or Sophie said?
<Getting Student to Relate>
10
749
104,614
10
1
Do you think either of them is right or wrong?
<Getting Student to Relate>
10
-1
104,614
11
0
I think both are wrong
null
10
-1
104,614
12
0
Is that right ???
null
10
749
104,614
13
1
OK. So if Alex is wrong, what do you think would be the right answer for his question?
<Getting Student to Relate>
10
-1
104,614
14
0
Both are wrong
null
10
-1
104,614
15
0
Or Sophie is correct
null
10
749
104,614
16
1
what do you think 5.4598 rounds to to 1dp?
<Press for Accuracy>
10
-1
104,614
17
0
5.45
null
10
-1
104,614
18
0
Maybe or not sure
null
10
749
104,614
19
1
That's two decimal places, not one.
<None>
10
-1
104,614
20
0
5.4510
null
10
-1
104,614
21
0
Can you give me a clue
null
10
-1
104,614
22
0
Please
null
10
749
104,614
23
1
An answer to 1 decimal place should have only one digit after the decimal point.
<None>
10
-1
104,614
24
0
What do you mean by that
null
10
749
104,614
25
1
Have you worked on rounding before?
<Keep Together>
10
-1
104,614
26
0
Yes
null
10
749
104,614
27
1
Can you round 5.45 to one decimal place?
<Press for Accuracy>
10
-1
104,614
28
0
54.5
null
10
749
104,614
29
1
No, the answer would be 5.5
<Revoicing>
10
-1
104,614
30
0
Oh I get it the now
null
10
749
104,614
31
1
I think maybe you multiplied by ten, is that right?
<Keep Together>
10
-1
104,614
32
0
How does this work
null
10
-1
104,614
33
0
Because like 5.45 to one decimal should be the same no changes
null
10
749
104,614
34
1
To 1 decimal place, it's 5.5
<None>
10
-1
104,614
35
0
Ok
null
10
-1
104,614
36
0
thank you so much
null
10
-1
104,614
37
0
Take care
null
10
-1
104,614
38
0
Enjoy the rest of your day
null
10
-1
104,614
39
0
So nice to speak to you
null
10
749
104,614
40
1
You're welcome. would you like to talk about Sophie's answer too or would you like me to hand you back to the lesson?
<Keep Together>
10
-1
104,614
41
0
Hand me back to lesson thanks
null
14
67
129,129
1
1
Hi Nathaniel, How are you today?
<None>
14
-1
129,129
2
0
im good, im not sure how to solve this
null
14
67
129,129
3
1
good :) OK, let's have a look
<None>
14
67
129,129
4
1
What do you think this question is asking?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
5
0
the value of 54+58/2
null
14
67
129,129
6
1
super! what do you think we should do first?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
7
0
i think add 54 and 58?
null
14
67
129,129
8
1
Yes, I agree! what answer does that give?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
9
0
i think 114?
null
14
67
129,129
10
1
not quite
<None>
14
-1
129,129
11
0
112
null
14
67
129,129
12
1
Let's simplify... 54 = 50+4 and 58 = 50+8
<None>
14
67
129,129
13
1
🎉🎉
<None>
14
67
129,129
14
1
Great!!
<None>
14
67
129,129
15
1
Now, what is the final part of the question?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
16
0
we do something with the 2 and 112?
null
14
67
129,129
17
1
so we have 112/2
<Revoicing>
14
67
129,129
18
1
what does that line mean?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
19
0
halve?
null
14
67
129,129
20
1
well, the line with the 2 below it is a way of saying half
<None>
14
67
129,129
21
1
but the line in the fraction, is another way of saying divide in Maths
<None>
14
-1
129,129
22
0
so we divide 112 by 2?
null
14
67
129,129
23
1
That's it Nathaniel!! Well done!🎉😊
<None>
14
67
129,129
24
1
What answer will you get?
<Press for Accuracy>
14
-1
129,129
25
0
56
null
14
67
129,129
26
1
Super work Nathaniel! How do you feel about this now you've worked through it?
<Keep Together>
14
-1
129,129
27
0
very good
null
14
67
129,129
28
1
👏🎉😊 well done, you've been super today!
<None>
14
-1
129,129
29
0
thanks for the help
null
14
67
129,129
30
1
Are you ready to go back and submit your answer?
<Keep Together>
14
-1
129,129
31
0
yup
null
14
67
129,129
32
1
No problem!😊
<None>
23
-1
147,113
1
0
is it c
null
23
102
147,113
2
1
Hi, another wordy one! One sec while I read it through.
<None>
23
-1
147,113
3
0
kkkkkkkkk
null
23
102
147,113
4
1
Ok think about an example... What's the lowest common multiply of 3 and 5?
<Press for Accuracy>
23
102
147,113
5
1
*multiple
<None>
23
-1
147,113
6
0
15
null
23
102
147,113
7
1
Yep, do we get that by multiplying them together?
<Keep Together>
23
-1
147,113
8
0
45
null
23
102
147,113
9
1
I mean multiplying 3 and 5 together gives us the lowest common multiple, 15
<None>
23
-1
147,113
10
0
oh so am i rigt or not
null
23
102
147,113
11
1
For the question, we're trying to decide if multiplying numbers together gives us their lowest common multiple
<None>
23
102
147,113
12
1
So did it work for 3 and 5?
<Keep Together>
23
-1
147,113
13
0
yes
null
23
102
147,113
14
1
Great, so it works at least sometimes...
<None>
23
-1
147,113
15
0
is it b
null
23
102
147,113
16
1
Can you prove it?
<Press for Reasoning>
23
-1
147,113
17
0
no
null
23
102
147,113
18
1
Is there an example where it doesn't work?
<Press for Accuracy>
23
-1
147,113
19
0
i dont know
null
23
-1
147,113
20
0
d
null
23
102
147,113
21
1
Let's try... 4 and 6. What's the lowest common multiple?
<Press for Accuracy>
23
-1
147,113
22
0
its d
null
23
-1
147,113
23
0
24
null
23
-1
147,113
24
0
12
null
23
102
147,113
25
1
Yeah 12! Is that the same as multiplying 4 x 6?
<Keep Together>
23
-1
147,113
26
0
is it d
null
23
102
147,113
27
1
Well it worked for 3 and 5, but not 4 and 6
<None>