diff --git "a/source_corpus.csv" "b/source_corpus.csv"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/source_corpus.csv"
@@ -0,0 +1,6035 @@
+id,text,tts_text,category,subcategory,key_terms,difficulty,source,split_hint
+sci_000001,The finished product sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The finished product sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000002,The vegetable sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000003,Growth of Lactic acid bacteria on MRS agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of lactic acid bacteria on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000004,A fresh culture of Aerobic colony count organisms was streaked onto PCA to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of aerobic colony count organisms was streaked onto plate count agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000005,The analyst recorded pigmented colonies with characteristic fluorescence in some strains as the expected appearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar.,The analyst recorded pigmented colonies with characteristic fluorescence in some strains as the expected appearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000006,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Escherichia coli O157 on CT-SMAC was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Escherichia coli O157 on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000007,Growth of Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000008,Presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies on Baird-Parker agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies on Baird-Parker agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000009,"The surface swab was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The surface swab was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000010,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Aerobic colony count organisms on PCA was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for aerobic colony count organisms on plate count agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000011,"The raw material sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The raw material sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000012,The vegetable sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000013,The vegetable sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000014,A fresh culture of Clostridium perfringens was streaked onto TSC agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Clostridium perfringens was streaked onto tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000015,"After incubation, the MRS agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Lactic acid bacteria.","After incubation, the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with lactic acid bacteria.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000016,The analyst recorded black or dark grey colonies with a surrounding clear zone as the expected appearance of Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar.,The analyst recorded black or dark grey colonies with a surrounding clear zone as the expected appearance of Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000017,A fresh culture of Salmonella enterica was streaked onto XLD agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Salmonella enterica was streaked onto xylose lysine deoxycholate agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000018,A fresh culture of Listeria monocytogenes was streaked onto ALOA to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Listeria monocytogenes was streaked onto agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000019,The soil sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The soil sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000020,"After incubation, the TSC agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Clostridium perfringens.","After incubation, the tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Clostridium perfringens.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000021,The analyst recorded pink colonies with lecithinase precipitation as the expected appearance of Bacillus cereus on MYP agar.,The analyst recorded pink colonies with lecithinase precipitation as the expected appearance of Bacillus cereus on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000022,Presumptive Lactic acid bacteria colonies on MRS agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000023,"The meat sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The meat sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000024,A fresh culture of Campylobacter jejuni was streaked onto mCCDA to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Campylobacter jejuni was streaked onto modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000025,"The raw material sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The raw material sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000026,The analyst recorded yellow colonies associated with sucrose fermentation as the expected appearance of Vibrio cholerae on TCBS agar.,The analyst recorded yellow colonies associated with sucrose fermentation as the expected appearance of Vibrio cholerae on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000027,"After incubation, the CT-SMAC plate was checked for colonies consistent with Escherichia coli O157.","After incubation, the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Escherichia coli O157.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000028,A fresh culture of Bacillus cereus was streaked onto MYP agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Bacillus cereus was streaked onto mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000029,"After incubation, the TBX agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Escherichia coli.","After incubation, the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Escherichia coli.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000030,"The meat sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The meat sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000031,"The milk sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The milk sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000032,The analyst recorded separate yeast colonies and restricted mould growth as the expected appearance of Yeasts and moulds on DRBC agar.,The analyst recorded separate yeast colonies and restricted mould growth as the expected appearance of yeasts and moulds on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000033,Growth of Salmonella enterica on XLD agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Salmonella enterica on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000034,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Bacillus cereus on MYP agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Bacillus cereus on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000035,"After incubation, the TCBS agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After incubation, the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000036,Presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies on VRBGA were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies on violet red bile glucose agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000037,"After incubation, the XLD agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Salmonella enterica.","After incubation, the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Salmonella enterica.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000038,"The control sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The control sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000039,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Vibrio cholerae on TCBS agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Vibrio cholerae on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000040,Presumptive Escherichia coli O157 colonies on CT-SMAC were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Escherichia coli O157 colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000041,A fresh culture of Vibrio cholerae was streaked onto TCBS agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Vibrio cholerae was streaked onto thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000042,"The meat sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The meat sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000043,"After incubation, the Slanetz and Bartley agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Enterococcus faecalis.","After incubation, the Slanetz and Bartley agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Enterococcus faecalis.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000044,Growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on TCBS agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000045,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Listeria monocytogenes on ALOA was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Listeria monocytogenes on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000046,A fresh culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was streaked onto TCBS agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was streaked onto thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000047,"After incubation, the cetrimide agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After incubation, the cetrimide agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000048,"The wastewater sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The wastewater sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000049,"The buffer blank was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000050,"The buffer blank was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The buffer blank was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000051,The food sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The food sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000052,The analyst recorded red to maroon colonies as the expected appearance of Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar.,The analyst recorded red to maroon colonies as the expected appearance of Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000053,The raw material sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The raw material sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000054,"After incubation, the MYP agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Bacillus cereus.","After incubation, the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Bacillus cereus.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000055,Growth of Enterobacteriaceae on VRBGA was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Enterobacteriaceae on violet red bile glucose agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000056,Growth of Escherichia coli O157 on CT-SMAC was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Escherichia coli O157 on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000057,The raw material sample produced colonies on VRBGA that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,The raw material sample produced colonies on violet red bile glucose agar that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000058,A fresh culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was streaked onto cetrimide agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was streaked onto cetrimide agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000059,Growth of Yeasts and moulds on DRBC agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of yeasts and moulds on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000060,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Campylobacter jejuni on mCCDA was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Campylobacter jejuni on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000061,"After incubation, the PCA plate was checked for colonies consistent with Aerobic colony count organisms.","After incubation, the plate count agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with aerobic colony count organisms.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000062,A fresh culture of Escherichia coli O157 was streaked onto CT-SMAC to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Escherichia coli O157 was streaked onto cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000063,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Clostridium perfringens on TSC agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Clostridium perfringens on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000064,A fresh culture of Escherichia coli was streaked onto TBX agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Escherichia coli was streaked onto tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000065,Growth of Escherichia coli on TBX agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Escherichia coli on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000066,Presumptive Enterococcus faecalis colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Enterococcus faecalis colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000067,"After incubation, the VRBGA plate was checked for colonies consistent with Enterobacteriaceae.","After incubation, the violet red bile glucose agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Enterobacteriaceae.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000068,The analyst recorded pale colonies when sorbitol is not fermented as the expected appearance of Escherichia coli O157 on CT-SMAC.,The analyst recorded pale colonies when sorbitol is not fermented as the expected appearance of Escherichia coli O157 on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000069,A fresh culture of Yeasts and moulds was streaked onto DRBC agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of yeasts and moulds was streaked onto dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000070,"The finished product sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000071,Presumptive Vibrio parahaemolyticus colonies on TCBS agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Vibrio parahaemolyticus colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000072,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Lactic acid bacteria on MRS agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for lactic acid bacteria on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000073,The control sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The control sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000074,Presumptive Clostridium perfringens colonies on TSC agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Clostridium perfringens colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000075,The raw material sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The raw material sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000076,A fresh culture of Enterococcus faecalis was streaked onto Slanetz and Bartley agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Enterococcus faecalis was streaked onto Slanetz and Bartley agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000077,"The soil sample was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The soil sample was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000078,"The raw material sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The raw material sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000079,Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000080,Presumptive Yeasts and moulds colonies on DRBC agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000081,The finished product sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The finished product sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000082,"After incubation, the DRBC agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Yeasts and moulds.","After incubation, the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with yeasts and moulds.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000083,A fresh culture of Lactic acid bacteria was streaked onto MRS agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of lactic acid bacteria was streaked onto de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000084,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000085,"The surface swab was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The surface swab was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000086,Growth of Aerobic colony count organisms on PCA was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of aerobic colony count organisms on plate count agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000087,Growth of Bacillus cereus on MYP agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Bacillus cereus on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000088,The analyst recorded blue-green colonies with an opaque halo as the expected appearance of Listeria monocytogenes on ALOA.,The analyst recorded blue-green colonies with an opaque halo as the expected appearance of Listeria monocytogenes on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000089,The analyst recorded black colonies caused by sulfite reduction as the expected appearance of Clostridium perfringens on TSC agar.,The analyst recorded black colonies caused by sulfite reduction as the expected appearance of Clostridium perfringens on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000090,Presumptive Campylobacter jejuni colonies on mCCDA were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Campylobacter jejuni colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000091,"After incubation, the ALOA plate was checked for colonies consistent with Listeria monocytogenes.","After incubation, the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate was checked for colonies consistent with Listeria monocytogenes.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000092,"After incubation, the mCCDA plate was checked for colonies consistent with Campylobacter jejuni.","After incubation, the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Campylobacter jejuni.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000093,Growth of Vibrio cholerae on TCBS agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Vibrio cholerae on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000094,Growth of Listeria monocytogenes on ALOA was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Listeria monocytogenes on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000095,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Vibrio parahaemolyticus on TCBS agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Vibrio parahaemolyticus on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000096,The food sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The food sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000097,"The analyst recorded greyish, moist colonies under microaerobic conditions as the expected appearance of Campylobacter jejuni on mCCDA.","The analyst recorded greyish, moist colonies under microaerobic conditions as the expected appearance of Campylobacter jejuni on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000098,The meat sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The meat sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000099,"The wastewater sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The wastewater sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000100,The culture suspension produced colonies on CT-SMAC that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,The culture suspension produced colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000101,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Enterococcus faecalis on Slanetz and Bartley agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000102,Growth of Campylobacter jejuni on mCCDA was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Campylobacter jejuni on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000103,Growth of Clostridium perfringens on TSC agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Clostridium perfringens on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000104,Presumptive Escherichia coli colonies on TBX agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Escherichia coli colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000105,"After incubation, the Baird-Parker agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Staphylococcus aureus.","After incubation, the Baird-Parker agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Staphylococcus aureus.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000106,"The soil sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The soil sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000107,"The finished product sample was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The finished product sample was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000108,The food sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The food sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000109,"The soil sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The soil sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000110,"The buffer blank was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000111,The vegetable sample produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000112,A fresh culture of Staphylococcus aureus was streaked onto Baird-Parker agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Staphylococcus aureus was streaked onto Baird-Parker agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000113,The analyst recorded small colonies after incubation under suitable low-oxygen conditions as the expected appearance of Lactic acid bacteria on MRS agar.,The analyst recorded small colonies after incubation under suitable low-oxygen conditions as the expected appearance of lactic acid bacteria on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000114,"After incubation, the TCBS agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Vibrio cholerae.","After incubation, the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate was checked for colonies consistent with Vibrio cholerae.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000115,"The water sample was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The water sample was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000116,The enrichment broth produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000117,The control sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The control sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000118,The analyst recorded mixed colony morphologies on a non-selective medium as the expected appearance of Aerobic colony count organisms on PCA.,The analyst recorded mixed colony morphologies on a non-selective medium as the expected appearance of aerobic colony count organisms on plate count agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000119,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Enterobacteriaceae on VRBGA was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Enterobacteriaceae on violet red bile glucose agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000120,The vegetable sample produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000121,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Salmonella enterica on XLD agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Salmonella enterica on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000122,The enrichment broth produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000123,"The analyst recorded purple-red colonies, sometimes with a precipitation halo as the expected appearance of Enterobacteriaceae on VRBGA.","The analyst recorded purple-red colonies, sometimes with a precipitation halo as the expected appearance of Enterobacteriaceae on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000124,"The water sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The water sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000125,The vegetable sample produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000126,The meat sample produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The meat sample produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000127,The water sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The water sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000128,Presumptive Vibrio cholerae colonies on TCBS agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Vibrio cholerae colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000129,The environmental swab produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The environmental swab produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000130,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Escherichia coli on TBX agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Escherichia coli on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000131,"The analyst recorded red colonies, often with black centres when hydrogen sulfide is produced as the expected appearance of Salmonella enterica on XLD agar.","The analyst recorded red colonies, often with black centres when hydrogen sulfide is produced as the expected appearance of Salmonella enterica on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000132,"The water sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The water sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000133,The analyst recorded green to blue-green colonies when sucrose is not fermented as the expected appearance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on TCBS agar.,The analyst recorded green to blue-green colonies when sucrose is not fermented as the expected appearance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000134,"The wastewater sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The wastewater sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000135,"The vegetable sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000136,The control sample produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The control sample produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000137,The wastewater sample produced colonies on CT-SMAC that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000138,"The water sample was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The water sample was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000139,Presumptive Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonies on cetrimide agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonies on cetrimide agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000140,The wastewater sample produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000141,"The meat sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The meat sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000142,The analyst recorded blue-green colonies when beta-glucuronidase is expressed as the expected appearance of Escherichia coli on TBX agar.,The analyst recorded blue-green colonies when beta-glucuronidase is expressed as the expected appearance of Escherichia coli on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000143,The raw material sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The raw material sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000144,The vegetable sample produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000145,"The environmental swab was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000146,"The finished product sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The finished product sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000147,A fresh culture of Enterobacteriaceae was streaked onto VRBGA to obtain well-isolated colonies.,A fresh culture of Enterobacteriaceae was streaked onto violet red bile glucose agar to obtain well-isolated colonies.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000148,The culture suspension produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The culture suspension produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000149,Presumptive Aerobic colony count organisms colonies on PCA were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive aerobic colony count organisms colonies on plate count agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000150,"The buffer blank was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000151,"The culture suspension was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The culture suspension was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000152,"The culture suspension was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The culture suspension was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000153,"The raw material sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The raw material sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000154,The meat sample produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The meat sample produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000155,"The finished product sample was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The finished product sample was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000156,The surface swab produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The surface swab produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000157,The culture suspension produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The culture suspension produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000158,"The culture suspension was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The culture suspension was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000159,The wastewater sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000160,Growth of Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,Growth of Staphylococcus aureus on Baird-Parker agar was compared with the positive control before reporting.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000161,Presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies on MYP agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000162,The enrichment broth produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000163,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Yeasts and moulds on DRBC agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for yeasts and moulds on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000164,The meat sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The meat sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000165,The finished product sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The finished product sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000166,The milk sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The milk sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000167,"The control sample was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The control sample was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000168,The food sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The food sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000169,"The wastewater sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The wastewater sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000170,The milk sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The milk sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000171,"The environmental swab was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The environmental swab was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000172,The enrichment broth produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000173,"The water sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The water sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000174,"The raw material sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The raw material sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000175,The wastewater sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000176,"The soil sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The soil sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000177,The food sample produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The food sample produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000178,"The food sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The food sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000179,The soil sample produced colonies on CT-SMAC that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,The soil sample produced colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000180,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar was atypical.,The plate was re-examined because the colony morphology for Pseudomonas aeruginosa on cetrimide agar was atypical.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000181,Presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies on ALOA were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000182,"The culture suspension was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The culture suspension was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000183,The enrichment broth produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000184,The water sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The water sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000185,The food sample produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The food sample produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000186,"The water sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The water sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000187,The environmental swab produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The environmental swab produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000188,"The raw material sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The raw material sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000189,"The food sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The food sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000190,The environmental swab produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The environmental swab produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000191,"The control sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The control sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000192,The meat sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The meat sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000193,The water sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The water sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000194,"The raw material sample was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The raw material sample was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000195,The environmental swab produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The environmental swab produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000196,"The control sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The control sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000197,"The buffer blank was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000198,"The surface swab was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The surface swab was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000199,The wastewater sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000200,The raw material sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The raw material sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000201,The culture suspension produced colonies on VRBGA that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,The culture suspension produced colonies on violet red bile glucose agar that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000202,The environmental swab produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The environmental swab produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000203,The buffer blank produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The buffer blank produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000204,The soil sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The soil sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000205,The buffer blank produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The buffer blank produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000206,The soil sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The soil sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000207,The buffer blank produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The buffer blank produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000208,The water sample produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The water sample produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000209,"The vegetable sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000210,"The vegetable sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000211,The buffer blank produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The buffer blank produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000212,The control sample produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The control sample produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000213,"The soil sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The soil sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000214,"The finished product sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000215,The buffer blank produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The buffer blank produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000216,"The buffer blank was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000217,"The finished product sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000218,The buffer blank produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The buffer blank produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000219,"The buffer blank was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The buffer blank was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000220,The finished product sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The finished product sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000221,"The milk sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The milk sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000222,"The surface swab was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The surface swab was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000223,The environmental swab produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The environmental swab produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000224,"The buffer blank was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The buffer blank was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000225,"The buffer blank was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000226,"The enrichment broth was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000227,"The soil sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The soil sample was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000228,"The culture suspension was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The culture suspension was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000229,"The control sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The control sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000230,"The meat sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The meat sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000231,"The environmental swab was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The environmental swab was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000232,The wastewater sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000233,The buffer blank produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The buffer blank produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000234,Presumptive Salmonella enterica colonies on XLD agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,Presumptive Salmonella enterica colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar were selected for confirmatory identification.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000235,"The food sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The food sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000236,"The vegetable sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000237,The vegetable sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000238,The milk sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The milk sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000239,"The meat sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The meat sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000240,"The raw material sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The raw material sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000241,"The finished product sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000242,The buffer blank produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The buffer blank produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000243,The soil sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The soil sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000244,The food sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The food sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000245,The buffer blank produced colonies on CT-SMAC that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,The buffer blank produced colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000246,The meat sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The meat sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000247,"The water sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The water sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000248,"The enrichment broth was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000249,"The finished product sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000250,The finished product sample produced colonies on XLD agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,The finished product sample produced colonies on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000251,"The meat sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The meat sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000252,"The water sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The water sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000253,"The food sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The food sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000254,"The milk sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The milk sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000255,"The environmental swab was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The environmental swab was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000256,The buffer blank produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The buffer blank produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000257,"The meat sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The meat sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000258,"The water sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The water sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000259,The culture suspension produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The culture suspension produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000260,"The meat sample was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The meat sample was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000261,"The control sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The control sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000262,"The control sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The control sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000263,The environmental swab produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The environmental swab produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000264,"The raw material sample was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The raw material sample was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000265,"The surface swab was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The surface swab was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000266,"The culture suspension was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The culture suspension was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000267,The water sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The water sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000268,"The control sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The control sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000269,The environmental swab produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The environmental swab produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000270,"The meat sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.","The meat sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000271,"The environmental swab was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The environmental swab was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000272,"The milk sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The milk sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000273,The control sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The control sample produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000274,The finished product sample produced colonies on VRBGA that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,The finished product sample produced colonies on violet red bile glucose agar that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000275,"The environmental swab was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The environmental swab was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000276,The finished product sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The finished product sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000277,"The wastewater sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The wastewater sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000278,The milk sample produced colonies on VRBGA that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,The milk sample produced colonies on violet red bile glucose agar that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000279,The control sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The control sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000280,The vegetable sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000281,"The wastewater sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The wastewater sample was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000282,The water sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The water sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000283,"The surface swab was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The surface swab was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000284,"The culture suspension was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The culture suspension was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000285,The meat sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The meat sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000286,The environmental swab produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The environmental swab produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000287,The vegetable sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000288,"The food sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The food sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000289,"The buffer blank was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The buffer blank was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000290,The control sample produced colonies on CT-SMAC that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,The control sample produced colonies on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000291,"The surface swab was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The surface swab was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000292,"The enrichment broth was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000293,"The enrichment broth was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000294,"The environmental swab was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on XLD agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Salmonella enterica, and typical growth was assessed on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000295,The wastewater sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000296,"The vegetable sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000297,"The water sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The water sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000298,"The finished product sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000299,The enrichment broth produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000300,"The environmental swab was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000301,The control sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The control sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000302,"The meat sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The meat sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000303,"The food sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The food sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000304,"The water sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The water sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000305,"The enrichment broth was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The enrichment broth was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000306,"The vegetable sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000307,The enrichment broth produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000308,"The milk sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The milk sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000309,The buffer blank produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The buffer blank produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000310,"The enrichment broth was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000311,The finished product sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The finished product sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000312,"The soil sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The soil sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000313,"The surface swab was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The surface swab was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000314,"The finished product sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The finished product sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000315,"The vegetable sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The vegetable sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000316,"The environmental swab was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000317,The finished product sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,The finished product sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000318,"The environmental swab was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000319,"The wastewater sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The wastewater sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000320,"The soil sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The soil sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000321,"The surface swab was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The surface swab was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000322,"The raw material sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The raw material sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000323,The culture suspension produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The culture suspension produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000324,The water sample produced colonies on MYP agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,The water sample produced colonies on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar that required confirmation for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000325,"The vegetable sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000326,The finished product sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The finished product sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000327,"The wastewater sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The wastewater sample was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000328,"The enrichment broth was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The enrichment broth was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000329,The culture suspension produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The culture suspension produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000330,"The buffer blank was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The buffer blank was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000331,The raw material sample produced colonies on MRS agar that required confirmation for Lactic acid bacteria.,The raw material sample produced colonies on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar that required confirmation for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000332,The soil sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The soil sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000333,The surface swab produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The surface swab produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000334,"The vegetable sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The vegetable sample was examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000335,"The environmental swab was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on MYP agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Bacillus cereus, and typical growth was assessed on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000336,The surface swab produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The surface swab produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000337,The wastewater sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The wastewater sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000338,"The enrichment broth was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000339,The milk sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The milk sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000340,"The environmental swab was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The environmental swab was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000341,"The control sample was examined for Yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on DRBC agar.","The control sample was examined for yeasts and moulds, and typical growth was assessed on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000342,The buffer blank produced colonies on VRBGA that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,The buffer blank produced colonies on violet red bile glucose agar that required confirmation for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000343,The finished product sample produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The finished product sample produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000344,"The milk sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.","The milk sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000345,The environmental swab produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The environmental swab produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000346,The vegetable sample produced colonies on TBX agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,The vegetable sample produced colonies on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar that required confirmation for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000347,The milk sample produced colonies on DRBC agar that required confirmation for Yeasts and moulds.,The milk sample produced colonies on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar that required confirmation for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000348,The food sample produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The food sample produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000349,"The soil sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The soil sample was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000350,"The raw material sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The raw material sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000351,"The control sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The control sample was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000352,"The soil sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on VRBGA.","The soil sample was examined for Enterobacteriaceae, and typical growth was assessed on violet red bile glucose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000353,"The meat sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on TBX agar.","The meat sample was examined for Escherichia coli, and typical growth was assessed on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000354,"The water sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.","The water sample was examined for Staphylococcus aureus, and typical growth was assessed on Baird-Parker agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000355,"The soil sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The soil sample was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000356,"The buffer blank was examined for Aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on PCA.","The buffer blank was examined for aerobic colony count organisms, and typical growth was assessed on plate count agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000357,The milk sample produced colonies on TCBS agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The milk sample produced colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar that required confirmation for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000358,The culture suspension produced colonies on TSC agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,The culture suspension produced colonies on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar that required confirmation for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000359,The buffer blank produced colonies on PCA that required confirmation for Aerobic colony count organisms.,The buffer blank produced colonies on plate count agar that required confirmation for aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000360,The control sample produced colonies on mCCDA that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,The control sample produced colonies on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar that required confirmation for Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000361,"The food sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.","The food sample was examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and typical growth was assessed on cetrimide agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000362,"The enrichment broth was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on TCBS agar.","The enrichment broth was examined for Vibrio cholerae, and typical growth was assessed on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000363,The water sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,The water sample produced colonies on Slanetz and Bartley agar that required confirmation for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000364,The enrichment broth produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The enrichment broth produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000365,"The food sample was examined for Lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on MRS agar.","The food sample was examined for lactic acid bacteria, and typical growth was assessed on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000366,The soil sample produced colonies on ALOA that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,The soil sample produced colonies on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti that required confirmation for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000367,"The milk sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on ALOA.","The milk sample was examined for Listeria monocytogenes, and typical growth was assessed on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000368,"The surface swab was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.","The surface swab was examined for Enterococcus faecalis, and typical growth was assessed on Slanetz and Bartley agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000369,The control sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The control sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000370,"The enrichment broth was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on CT-SMAC.","The enrichment broth was examined for Escherichia coli O157, and typical growth was assessed on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000371,The water sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,The water sample produced colonies on Baird-Parker agar that required confirmation for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000372,The surface swab produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The surface swab produced colonies on cetrimide agar that required confirmation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,culture_and_media,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000373,"The finished product sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on TSC agar.","The finished product sample was examined for Clostridium perfringens, and typical growth was assessed on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000374,"The culture suspension was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on mCCDA.","The culture suspension was examined for Campylobacter jejuni, and typical growth was assessed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",microbiology,culture_and_media,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000375,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 4.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000376,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 7.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000377,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 1.1 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000378,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the TCBS agar plates.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000379,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000380,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa count was below the reporting limit after examination of the cetrimide agar plates.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa count was below the reporting limit after examination of the cetrimide agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000381,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1.5 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000382,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5.4 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000383,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 2.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000384,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000385,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000386,No typical Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonies were detected on the countable cetrimide agar plates.,No typical Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonies were detected on the countable cetrimide agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000387,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000388,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 1.2 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000389,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000390,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 3.2 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000391,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 3.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000392,A count of 83 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of eighty three colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000393,A count of 54 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of fifty four colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000394,No typical Vibrio cholerae colonies were detected on the countable TCBS agar plates.,No typical Vibrio cholerae colonies were detected on the countable thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000395,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 5.4 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000396,No typical Vibrio parahaemolyticus colonies were detected on the countable TCBS agar plates.,No typical Vibrio parahaemolyticus colonies were detected on the countable thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000397,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000398,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 7.5 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000399,No typical Lactic acid bacteria colonies were detected on the countable MRS agar plates.,No typical lactic acid bacteria colonies were detected on the countable de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000400,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000401,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 6.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000402,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000403,The water sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000404,A volume of 10 uL was plated on ALOA for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000405,The food sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The food sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000406,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 1.1 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000407,A count of 48 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of forty eight colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000408,A volume of 100 uL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000409,A volume of 10 mL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000410,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000411,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 2.5 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000412,A count of 33 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of thirty three colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000413,The Bacillus cereus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the MYP agar plates.,The Bacillus cereus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000414,A count of 60 colonies was recorded on the selected ALOA plate.,A count of sixty colonies was recorded on the selected agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000415,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 6.8 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000416,A volume of 10 uL was plated on VRBGA for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on violet red bile glucose agar for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000417,The Staphylococcus aureus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the Baird-Parker agar plates.,The Staphylococcus aureus count was below the reporting limit after examination of the Baird-Parker agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000418,A count of 69 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of sixty nine colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000419,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000420,A volume of 25 mL was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000421,The Yeasts and moulds count was below the reporting limit after examination of the DRBC agar plates.,The yeasts and moulds count was below the reporting limit after examination of the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000422,No typical Enterobacteriaceae colonies were detected on the countable VRBGA plates.,No typical Enterobacteriaceae colonies were detected on the countable violet red bile glucose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000423,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000424,A count of 47 colonies was recorded on the selected mCCDA plate.,A count of forty seven colonies was recorded on the selected modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000425,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000426,No typical Aerobic colony count organisms colonies were detected on the countable PCA plates.,No typical aerobic colony count organisms colonies were detected on the countable plate count agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000427,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000428,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 9.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000429,The control sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000430,No typical Staphylococcus aureus colonies were detected on the countable Baird-Parker agar plates.,No typical Staphylococcus aureus colonies were detected on the countable Baird-Parker agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000431,The Vibrio cholerae result was 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000432,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000433,A volume of 1 mL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000434,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000435,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000436,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000437,A volume of 50 uL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000438,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 5.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000439,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 2.3 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000440,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000441,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 8.6 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000442,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000443,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000444,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000445,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 5.4 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000446,Enumeration on MYP agar gave a calculated result of 2.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000447,A count of 72 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of seventy two colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000448,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1.8 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000449,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000450,The Campylobacter jejuni count was below the reporting limit after examination of the mCCDA plates.,The Campylobacter jejuni count was below the reporting limit after examination of the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000451,A volume of 25 mL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000452,The Clostridium perfringens result was 2.5 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000453,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 6.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000454,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 2.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000455,The Aerobic colony count organisms count was below the reporting limit after examination of the PCA plates.,The aerobic colony count organisms count was below the reporting limit after examination of the plate count agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000456,A count of 40 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of forty colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000457,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 5.4 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000458,A volume of 1 mL was plated on ALOA for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000459,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 2.7 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000460,A count of 74 colonies was recorded on the selected ALOA plate.,A count of seventy four colonies was recorded on the selected agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000461,The Salmonella enterica result was 1.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000462,A volume of 50 uL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000463,The Clostridium perfringens count was below the reporting limit after examination of the TSC agar plates.,The Clostridium perfringens count was below the reporting limit after examination of the tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000464,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 3.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000465,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 4.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000466,A count of 42 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of forty two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000467,A count of 54 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of fifty four colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000468,No typical Yeasts and moulds colonies were detected on the countable DRBC agar plates.,No typical yeasts and moulds colonies were detected on the countable dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000469,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000470,The Clostridium perfringens result was 6.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000471,A count of 39 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of thirty nine colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000472,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000473,The food sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The food sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000474,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000475,A count of 46 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of forty six colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000476,A volume of 10 mL was plated on VRBGA for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on violet red bile glucose agar for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000477,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000478,A volume of 100 mL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000479,The Salmonella enterica result was 3.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000480,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 3.5 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000481,The Escherichia coli O157 count was below the reporting limit after examination of the CT-SMAC plates.,The Escherichia coli O157 count was below the reporting limit after examination of the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000482,A count of 84 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of eighty four colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000483,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 3.5 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000484,No typical Escherichia coli colonies were detected on the countable TBX agar plates.,No typical Escherichia coli colonies were detected on the countable tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000485,A volume of 1 mL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000486,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 3.2 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000487,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000488,No typical Escherichia coli O157 colonies were detected on the countable CT-SMAC plates.,No typical Escherichia coli O157 colonies were detected on the countable cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000489,A count of 53 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of fifty three colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000490,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000491,A count of 87 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of eighty seven colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000492,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000493,A volume of 500 uL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000494,The soil sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The soil sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000495,A count of 66 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of sixty six colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000496,A count of 88 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of eighty eight colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000497,A count of 54 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of fifty four colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000498,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000499,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000500,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000501,The Salmonella enterica count was below the reporting limit after examination of the XLD agar plates.,The Salmonella enterica count was below the reporting limit after examination of the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000502,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000503,A count of 40 colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,A count of forty colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000504,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000505,A count of 35 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of thirty five colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000506,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000507,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000508,The water sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000509,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 4.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000510,The Bacillus cereus result was 4.6 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000511,A volume of 100 uL was plated on ALOA for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000512,A volume of 10 mL was plated on mCCDA for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000513,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 7.5 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000514,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 7.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000515,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000516,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000517,The Escherichia coli count was below the reporting limit after examination of the TBX agar plates.,The Escherichia coli count was below the reporting limit after examination of the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000518,A count of 39 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of thirty nine colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000519,Enumeration on MYP agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000520,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 4.6 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000521,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000522,The Vibrio cholerae count was below the reporting limit after examination of the TCBS agar plates.,The Vibrio cholerae count was below the reporting limit after examination of the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000523,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000524,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000525,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 6.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000526,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 8.6 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000527,The Escherichia coli result was 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Escherichia coli result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000528,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7.5 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000529,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 5.4 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000530,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 3.2 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000531,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 5.4 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000532,A volume of 10 uL was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000533,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 5.4 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 4 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000534,A count of 23 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of twenty three colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000535,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 5.4 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 4 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000536,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1.1 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000537,A count of 37 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of thirty seven colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000538,A volume of 500 uL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000539,A volume of 500 uL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000540,A count of 80 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of eighty colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000541,The Salmonella enterica result was 1.1 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000542,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000543,No typical Listeria monocytogenes colonies were detected on the countable ALOA plates.,No typical Listeria monocytogenes colonies were detected on the countable agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000544,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000545,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000546,The Vibrio cholerae result was 7.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000547,The Salmonella enterica result was 3.2 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000548,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000549,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000550,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 7.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000551,A count of 72 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of seventy two colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000552,No typical Enterococcus faecalis colonies were detected on the countable Slanetz and Bartley agar plates.,No typical Enterococcus faecalis colonies were detected on the countable Slanetz and Bartley agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000553,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 7.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000554,The Salmonella enterica result was 2.7 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000555,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on mCCDA for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000556,A count of 88 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of eighty eight colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000557,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 5.4 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000558,A count of 30 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of thirty colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000559,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 8.6 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000560,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000561,A volume of 25 mL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000562,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 1.2 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000563,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2.7 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000564,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 6.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000565,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000566,A count of 76 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of seventy six colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000567,The Listeria monocytogenes count was below the reporting limit after examination of the ALOA plates.,The Listeria monocytogenes count was below the reporting limit after examination of the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000568,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 4.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000569,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000570,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 1.5 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000571,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000572,A volume of 10 uL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000573,The Bacillus cereus result was 8.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Bacillus cereus result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000574,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000575,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000576,A count of 74 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of seventy four colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000577,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 6.8 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000578,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 2.7 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000579,A volume of 25 mL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000580,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 1.5 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000581,The Lactic acid bacteria count was below the reporting limit after examination of the MRS agar plates.,The lactic acid bacteria count was below the reporting limit after examination of the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000582,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000583,The Vibrio cholerae result was 4.6 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000584,A count of 78 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of seventy eight colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000585,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000586,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 6.8 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000587,A count of 60 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of sixty colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000588,No typical Salmonella enterica colonies were detected on the countable XLD agar plates.,No typical Salmonella enterica colonies were detected on the countable xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000589,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000590,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 7.0 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000591,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 2.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000592,The Escherichia coli result was 5.4 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000593,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000594,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000595,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000596,A count of 28 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of twenty eight colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000597,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000598,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000599,A count of 25 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of twenty five colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000600,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 3.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000601,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 3.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000602,The Bacillus cereus result was 2.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Bacillus cereus result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000603,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 5.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000604,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 3.2 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000605,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 1.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000606,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 6.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000607,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000608,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 7.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000609,The Yeasts and moulds result was 1.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000610,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 3.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000611,No typical Clostridium perfringens colonies were detected on the countable TSC agar plates.,No typical Clostridium perfringens colonies were detected on the countable tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000612,A volume of 1 mL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000613,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000614,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000615,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 1.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000616,A volume of 10 mL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000617,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000618,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000619,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000620,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 1.8 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000621,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000622,A count of 61 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of sixty one colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000623,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000624,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 6.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000625,A count of 90 colonies was recorded on the selected ALOA plate.,A count of ninety colonies was recorded on the selected agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000626,The Escherichia coli result was 7.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000627,A count of 22 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of twenty two colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000628,A volume of 100 mL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000629,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 1.8 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000630,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000631,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 3.5 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000632,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 2.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000633,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000634,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000635,A count of 64 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of sixty four colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000636,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000637,No typical Bacillus cereus colonies were detected on the countable MYP agar plates.,No typical Bacillus cereus colonies were detected on the countable mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000638,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000639,A volume of 10 uL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000640,The food sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The food sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000641,The Enterobacteriaceae count was below the reporting limit after examination of the VRBGA plates.,The Enterobacteriaceae count was below the reporting limit after examination of the violet red bile glucose agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000642,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000643,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000644,A volume of 100 uL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000645,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 8.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000646,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000647,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 1.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000648,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 7.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000649,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000650,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 8.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the environmental swab.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the environmental swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000651,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 2.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000652,The Enterococcus faecalis count was below the reporting limit after examination of the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates.,The Enterococcus faecalis count was below the reporting limit after examination of the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000653,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000654,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000655,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000656,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on ALOA for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000657,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 4.6 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000658,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000659,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000660,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 2.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000661,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 5.4 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 4 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000662,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 4.6 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 6 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000663,The Clostridium perfringens result was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000664,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000665,A count of 35 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of thirty five colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000666,A volume of 50 uL was plated on ALOA for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti for quantitative recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000667,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 1.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000668,A volume of 50 uL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000669,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000670,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000671,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000672,A count of 60 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of sixty colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000673,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000674,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 1.1 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000675,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on VRBGA for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on violet red bile glucose agar for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000676,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000677,A volume of 10 uL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000678,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000679,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 2.3 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000680,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 4.6 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 6 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000681,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000682,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000683,A volume of 1 mL was plated on TSC agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000684,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 3.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000685,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 8.6 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000686,A count of 85 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of eighty five colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000687,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 6.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000688,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4.6 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000689,A count of 35 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of thirty five colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000690,The Clostridium perfringens result was 8.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000691,The soil sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The soil sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000692,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 2.3 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000693,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000694,A count of 62 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of sixty two colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000695,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 2.3 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000696,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 3.5 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000697,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 5.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000698,The Yeasts and moulds result was 7.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000699,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000700,A volume of 1 mL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000701,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 9.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000702,A count of 48 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of forty eight colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000703,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000704,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000705,The Yeasts and moulds result was 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The yeasts and moulds result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000706,A count of 91 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of ninety one colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000707,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 2.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000708,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 1.2 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000709,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 9.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000710,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 5.4 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 4 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000711,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000712,A volume of 10 uL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000713,A volume of 25 mL was plated on TSC agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000714,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000715,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000716,The control sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000717,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000718,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 1.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000719,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7.5 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000720,The Escherichia coli result was 2.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000721,A count of 93 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of ninety three colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000722,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 7.0 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000723,A volume of 25 mL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000724,The Vibrio cholerae result was 2.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000725,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000726,A count of 52 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of fifty two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000727,A volume of 100 uL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000728,A volume of 50 uL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000729,A count of 44 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of forty four colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000730,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 8.6 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000731,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 2.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000732,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2.5 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000733,A count of 43 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of forty three colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000734,A count of 75 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of seventy five colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000735,Enumeration on MYP agar gave a calculated result of 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000736,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4.6 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 6 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000737,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 7.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000738,A volume of 100 mL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000739,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 5.4 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000740,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 3.2 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000741,The Salmonella enterica result was 8.6 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000742,A count of 61 colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,A count of sixty one colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000743,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4.6 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the environmental swab.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the environmental swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000744,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2.3 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000745,A count of 35 colonies was recorded on the selected mCCDA plate.,A count of thirty five colonies was recorded on the selected modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000746,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000747,A count of 80 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of eighty colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000748,The Bacillus cereus result was 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000749,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000750,The water sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000751,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000752,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 6.8 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000753,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000754,The food sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The food sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000755,The water sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000756,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000757,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000758,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000759,The Vibrio cholerae result was 6.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000760,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000761,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 8.6 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000762,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 4.6 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000763,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000764,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000765,The Escherichia coli result was 2.7 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Escherichia coli result was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000766,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000767,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000768,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8.6 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000769,A volume of 50 uL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000770,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000771,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 3.2 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000772,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000773,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000774,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 4.6 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000775,A count of 58 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of fifty eight colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000776,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000777,A count of 89 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of eighty nine colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000778,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000779,A volume of 50 uL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000780,The water sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000781,A volume of 25 mL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000782,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000783,The Bacillus cereus result was 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000784,A count of 47 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of forty seven colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000785,A volume of 50 uL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000786,A count of 71 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of seventy one colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000787,A volume of 10 mL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000788,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 5.4 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000789,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 2.7 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000790,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 6.8 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000791,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000792,The Escherichia coli result was 1.8 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000793,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 9.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000794,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 5.4 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000795,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 3.2 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000796,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000797,A volume of 10 mL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000798,The water sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000799,A count of 69 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of sixty nine colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000800,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 2.3 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000801,A volume of 100 mL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000802,A volume of 100 mL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000803,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 3.2 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000804,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000805,A count of 51 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of fifty one colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000806,The Salmonella enterica result was 1.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000807,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 5.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000808,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 8.6 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 6 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000809,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000810,A volume of 100 uL was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000811,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000812,The soil sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The soil sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000813,A volume of 500 uL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000814,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 2.7 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000815,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1.8 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000816,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000817,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000818,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000819,A count of 78 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of seventy eight colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000820,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000821,The Salmonella enterica result was 8.6 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the environmental swab.,The Salmonella enterica result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the environmental swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000822,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 7.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000823,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000824,A volume of 100 uL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000825,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000826,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000827,A count of 86 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of eighty six colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000828,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000829,A volume of 1 mL was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on Slanetz and Bartley agar for quantitative recovery of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000830,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 1.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000831,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 9.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000832,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000833,A count of 88 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of eighty eight colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000834,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000835,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000836,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 6.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000837,A count of 92 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of ninety two colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000838,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 1.1 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000839,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000840,The Escherichia coli result was 2.5 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000841,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000842,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000843,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000844,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 1.5 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000845,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8.6 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000846,A volume of 1 mL was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on cetrimide agar for quantitative recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000847,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 7.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000848,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2.5 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000849,The Yeasts and moulds result was 7.5 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The yeasts and moulds result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000850,A volume of 10 uL was plated on TSC agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000851,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000852,A count of 57 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of fifty seven colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000853,A count of 90 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of ninety colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000854,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 6.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000855,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000856,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000857,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000858,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1.8 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000859,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000860,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000861,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 5.4 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000862,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 9.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000863,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000864,A volume of 1 mL was plated on mCCDA for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000865,A volume of 100 uL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000866,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1.2 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000867,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 6.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000868,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000869,A count of 47 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of forty seven colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000870,The water sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000871,A count of 72 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of seventy two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000872,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.4 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000873,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 3.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000874,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000875,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 5.4 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000876,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000877,A count of 57 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of fifty seven colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000878,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 7.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000879,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 2.7 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000880,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000881,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 4.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000882,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000883,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000884,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000885,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000886,A volume of 100 mL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000887,A count of 38 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of thirty eight colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000888,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000889,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000890,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000891,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000892,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000893,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 1.8 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000894,A count of 39 colonies was recorded on the selected mCCDA plate.,A count of thirty nine colonies was recorded on the selected modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000895,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 1.2 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000896,A count of 38 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of thirty eight colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000897,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 1.2 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000898,The water sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000899,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000900,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000901,A volume of 1 mL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000902,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1.8 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000903,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 8.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000904,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000905,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 8.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000906,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 4.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000907,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000908,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000909,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000910,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000911,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000912,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000913,The Bacillus cereus result was 2.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000914,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000915,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000916,The control sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000917,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.4 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000918,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000919,A volume of 500 uL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000920,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 1.8 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000921,A volume of 10 mL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000922,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.4 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000923,A volume of 500 uL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000924,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 8.0 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000925,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2.3 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000926,A count of 59 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of fifty nine colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000927,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 3.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000928,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000929,A volume of 1 mL was plated on XLD agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000930,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000931,A volume of 10 mL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000932,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000933,A count of 71 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of seventy one colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000934,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 7.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000935,The Salmonella enterica result was 4.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Salmonella enterica result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000936,A count of 25 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of twenty five colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000937,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 6.0 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000938,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 2.3 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000939,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 5.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000940,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000941,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000942,A count of 55 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of fifty five colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000943,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 8.0 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000944,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000945,A count of 51 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of fifty one colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000946,A count of 43 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of forty three colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000947,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 6.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000948,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 2.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000949,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 7.5 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_000950,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000951,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.4 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000952,A count of 35 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of thirty five colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000953,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 6.8 x 10^1 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of one C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000954,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000955,No typical Campylobacter jejuni colonies were detected on the countable mCCDA plates.,No typical Campylobacter jejuni colonies were detected on the countable modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_000956,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 8.6 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000957,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000958,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 9.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000959,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 1.5 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000960,A count of 34 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of thirty four colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000961,A count of 90 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of ninety colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000962,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4.6 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000963,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 6.8 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000964,A count of 34 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of thirty four colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000965,A count of 31 colonies was recorded on the selected ALOA plate.,A count of thirty one colonies was recorded on the selected agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000966,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000967,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 9.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000968,A count of 43 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of forty three colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000969,The raw material sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The raw material sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000970,A count of 32 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of thirty two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000971,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 5.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000972,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 2.3 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000973,A count of 87 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of eighty seven colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000974,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000975,The Yeasts and moulds result was 1.8 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000976,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000977,A count of 21 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of twenty one colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000978,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000979,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 5.4 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000980,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000981,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000982,Enumeration on VRBGA gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on violet red bile glucose agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000983,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000984,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 6.8 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000985,A volume of 1 mL was plated on VRBGA for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,A volume of one millilitre was plated on violet red bile glucose agar for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000986,The control sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000987,A volume of 25 mL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000988,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000989,The soil sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The soil sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000990,A count of 43 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of forty three colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000991,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000992,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000993,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8.6 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa result was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000994,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.4 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the environmental swab.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the environmental swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000995,A volume of 50 uL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000996,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000997,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 7.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000998,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_000999,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 8.6 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001000,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 7.0 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001001,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001002,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001003,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001004,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001005,A count of 68 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of sixty eight colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001006,The reported count for Lactic acid bacteria was 1.1 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for lactic acid bacteria was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001007,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 3.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001008,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001009,The Salmonella enterica result was 2.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001010,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 8.6 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 8 point 6 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001011,A count of 62 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of sixty two colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001012,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001013,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 7.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001014,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001015,A count of 95 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of ninety five colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001016,A count of 77 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of seventy seven colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001017,A count of 49 colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,A count of forty nine colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001018,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001019,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 5.4 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001020,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001021,A count of 40 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of forty colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001022,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001023,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001024,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 5.4 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001025,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001026,The Vibrio cholerae result was 6.8 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001027,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001028,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 6.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001029,The Lactic acid bacteria result was 3.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The lactic acid bacteria result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001030,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001031,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 1.2 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001032,The soil sample was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Aerobic colony count organisms.,The soil sample was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001033,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001034,A count of 88 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of eighty eight colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001035,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001036,A volume of 10 uL was plated on PCA for quantitative recovery of Aerobic colony count organisms.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on plate count agar for quantitative recovery of aerobic colony count organisms.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001037,A count of 79 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of seventy nine colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001038,A count of 70 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of seventy colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001039,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001040,A count of 50 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of fifty colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001041,The wastewater sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,The wastewater sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001042,The Yeasts and moulds result was 4.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The yeasts and moulds result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001043,A volume of 25 mL was plated on mCCDA for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001044,The food sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The food sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001045,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001046,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001047,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001048,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001049,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 9.0 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001050,A volume of 100 uL was plated on mCCDA for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for quantitative recovery of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001051,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 1.1 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001052,A count of 55 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of fifty five colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001053,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 2.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001054,The Escherichia coli result was 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Escherichia coli result was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001055,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 2.7 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001056,A volume of 100 mL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001057,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001058,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 2.3 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 3 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001059,The Escherichia coli result was 5.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The Escherichia coli result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001060,A count of 26 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of twenty six colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001061,A count of 41 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of forty one colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001062,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 2.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001063,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 7.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001064,The water sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Lactic acid bacteria.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001065,A count of 62 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of sixty two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001066,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001067,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001068,A count of 77 colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,A count of seventy seven colonies was recorded on the selected cetrimide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001069,A count of 70 colonies was recorded on the selected mCCDA plate.,A count of seventy colonies was recorded on the selected modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001070,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on TBX agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001071,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 2.3 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001072,A count of 88 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of eighty eight colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001073,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001074,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1.1 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001075,The Vibrio cholerae result was 1.1 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001076,A count of 89 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of eighty nine colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001077,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001078,A count of 42 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of forty two colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001079,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 2.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001080,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001081,A count of 41 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of forty one colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001082,A count of 69 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of sixty nine colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001083,A count of 84 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of eighty four colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001084,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 8.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001085,The water sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001086,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 7.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cetrimide agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001087,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 3.2 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Bacillus cereus was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001088,The Salmonella enterica result was 1.8 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Salmonella enterica result was 1 point 8 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001089,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001090,A volume of 25 mL was plated on CT-SMAC for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was plated on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar for quantitative recovery of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001091,A count of 25 colonies was recorded on the selected PCA plate.,A count of twenty five colonies was recorded on the selected plate count agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001092,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001093,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 6.8 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001094,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 1.2 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the food sample.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 1 point 2 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the food sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001095,The vegetable sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The vegetable sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001096,The environmental swab was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The environmental swab was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001097,A volume of 50 uL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of fifty microlitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001098,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 9.0 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001099,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001100,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 4.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 4 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001101,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 1.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001102,Enumeration on TBX agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001103,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-2 dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus two dilution before enumeration of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001104,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 2.7 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001105,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 4.6 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Salmonella enterica was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001106,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001107,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001108,Enumeration on MYP agar gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001109,The Vibrio cholerae result was 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the water sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the water sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001110,A count of 24 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of twenty four colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001111,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001112,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001113,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001114,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 8.0 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001115,The meat sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The meat sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001116,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001117,Enumeration on XLD agar gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on xylose lysine deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001118,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 6.8 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Listeria monocytogenes was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001119,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2.7 x 10^7 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2 point 7 times ten to the power of seven C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001120,The culture suspension was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The culture suspension was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001121,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 9.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Enterococcus faecalis result was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001122,The control sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001123,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001124,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001125,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 2.5 x 10^4 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 5 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001126,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 3.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001127,A volume of 100 mL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001128,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001129,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 5.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001130,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001131,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001132,A count of 33 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of thirty three colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001133,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 7.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 7 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001134,The Clostridium perfringens result was 4.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001135,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the finished product sample.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the finished product sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001136,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 3.2 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001137,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001138,A count of 57 colonies was recorded on the selected mCCDA plate.,A count of fifty seven colonies was recorded on the selected modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001139,A count of 95 colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,A count of ninety five colonies was recorded on the selected Baird-Parker agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001140,A count of 69 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of sixty nine colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001141,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 8.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001142,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^6 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001143,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 5.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 5 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001144,The water sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001145,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 3.0 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001146,Enumeration on CT-SMAC gave a calculated result of 3.5 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001147,The milk sample was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The milk sample was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001148,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2.3 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Escherichia coli O157 result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001149,A count of 77 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of seventy seven colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001150,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001151,The Aerobic colony count organisms result was 5.4 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The aerobic colony count organisms result was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001152,Enumeration on MRS agar gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001153,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 1.1 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 1 point 1 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001154,A count of 45 colonies was recorded on the selected TSC agar plate.,A count of forty five colonies was recorded on the selected tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001155,Enumeration on TCBS agar gave a calculated result of 2.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001156,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 2.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the wastewater sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the wastewater sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001157,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 9.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 9 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001158,A count of 40 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of forty colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001159,A volume of 500 uL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001160,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-4 dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus four dilution before enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001161,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001162,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 1.5 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli was 1 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001163,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on TSC agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001164,A volume of 10 uL was plated on MYP agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,A volume of ten microlitres was plated on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar for quantitative recovery of Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001165,The control sample was plated from the 10^-1 dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,The control sample was plated from the ten to the minus one dilution before enumeration of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001166,Enumeration on PCA gave a calculated result of 8.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on plate count agar gave a calculated result of 8 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001167,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Clostridium perfringens result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001168,A count of 61 colonies was recorded on the selected CT-SMAC plate.,A count of sixty one colonies was recorded on the selected cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001169,The Bacillus cereus result was 3.0 x 10^2 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of two C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001170,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 8.0 x 10^8 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of eight C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001171,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001172,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 5.4 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Staphylococcus aureus was 5 point 4 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001173,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 4.6 x 10^4 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 4 point 6 times ten to the power of four C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001174,Enumeration on MYP agar gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001175,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001176,The surface swab was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,The surface swab was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001177,The Bacillus cereus result was 2.3 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the meat sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the meat sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001178,A count of 30 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of thirty colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001179,A count of 82 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of eighty two colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001180,The reported count for Aerobic colony count organisms was 3.5 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for aerobic colony count organisms was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001181,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 3.5 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Escherichia coli O157 was 3 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001182,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 6.0 x 10^5 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001183,A count of 44 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of forty four colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001184,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 2.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the raw material sample.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 2 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the raw material sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001185,A count of 77 colonies was recorded on the selected ALOA plate.,A count of seventy seven colonies was recorded on the selected agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001186,A count of 85 colonies was recorded on the selected MRS agar plate.,A count of eighty five colonies was recorded on the selected de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001187,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 8.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the culture suspension.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the culture suspension.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001188,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.1 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 1 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001189,A count of 28 colonies was recorded on the selected MYP agar plate.,A count of twenty eight colonies was recorded on the selected mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001190,A count of 63 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of sixty three colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001191,The Bacillus cereus result was 6.8 x 10^7 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Bacillus cereus result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001192,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 6.8 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Enterobacteriaceae was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001193,A volume of 100 uL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001194,A count of 65 colonies was recorded on the selected TBX agar plate.,A count of sixty five colonies was recorded on the selected tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001195,A volume of 500 uL was plated on MRS agar for quantitative recovery of Lactic acid bacteria.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar for quantitative recovery of lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,enumeration,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001196,A count of 26 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of twenty six colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001197,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 8.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 8 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001198,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 6.8 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the soil sample.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus result was 6 point 8 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the soil sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001199,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 6.0 x 10^4 CFU per gram in the milk sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 6 point 0 times ten to the power of four C F U per gram in the milk sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001200,The finished product sample was plated from the 10^-6 dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,The finished product sample was plated from the ten to the minus six dilution before enumeration of Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001201,Enumeration on DRBC agar gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001202,Enumeration on mCCDA gave a calculated result of 1.8 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 8 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001203,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2.5 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 2 point 5 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001204,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5.0 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001205,The buffer blank was plated from the 10^-5 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The buffer blank was plated from the ten to the minus five dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001206,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3.2 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Vibrio cholerae result was 3 point 2 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001207,A count of 79 colonies was recorded on the selected VRBGA plate.,A count of seventy nine colonies was recorded on the selected violet red bile glucose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001208,The Escherichia coli result was 4.0 x 10^3 CFU per gram in the buffer blank.,The Escherichia coli result was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per gram in the buffer blank.,microbiology,enumeration,Escherichia coli|TBX agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001209,The reported count for Yeasts and moulds was 4.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for yeasts and moulds was 4 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001210,Enumeration on TSC agar gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001211,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 2.3 x 10^6 CFU per gram in the control sample.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of six C F U per gram in the control sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001212,The water sample was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The water sample was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001213,A count of 50 colonies was recorded on the selected TCBS agar plate.,A count of fifty colonies was recorded on the selected thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001214,A volume of 500 uL was plated on TSC agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar for quantitative recovery of Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001215,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 2.3 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the enrichment broth.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the enrichment broth.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001216,A volume of 0.1 mL was plated on DRBC agar for quantitative recovery of Yeasts and moulds.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar for quantitative recovery of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001217,The enrichment broth was plated from the 10^-3 dilution before enumeration of Yeasts and moulds.,The enrichment broth was plated from the ten to the minus three dilution before enumeration of yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001218,A volume of 500 uL was plated on TCBS agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was plated on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar for quantitative recovery of Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001219,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 3.0 x 10^6 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Campylobacter jejuni was 3 point 0 times ten to the power of six C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001220,A count of 94 colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,A count of ninety four colonies was recorded on the selected Slanetz and Bartley agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001221,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 6.8 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 6 point 8 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001222,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 9.0 x 10^5 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Vibrio cholerae was 9 point 0 times ten to the power of five C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001223,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 2.3 x 10^2 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 2 point 3 times ten to the power of two C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001224,Enumeration on ALOA gave a calculated result of 7.5 x 10^5 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti gave a calculated result of 7 point 5 times ten to the power of five C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001225,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2.7 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 2 point 7 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001226,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 7.5 x 10^8 CFU per gram in the vegetable sample.,The Campylobacter jejuni result was 7 point 5 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram in the vegetable sample.,microbiology,enumeration,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001227,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 1.2 x 10^8 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Slanetz and Bartley agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 2 times ten to the power of eight C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001228,A count of 67 colonies was recorded on the selected XLD agar plate.,A count of sixty seven colonies was recorded on the selected xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001229,A count of 31 colonies was recorded on the selected DRBC agar plate.,A count of thirty one colonies was recorded on the selected dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plate.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001230,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 3.2 x 10^7 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 3 point 2 times ten to the power of seven C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001231,The Yeasts and moulds result was 5.0 x 10^1 CFU per gram in the surface swab.,The yeasts and moulds result was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram in the surface swab.,microbiology,enumeration,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001232,A volume of 100 mL was plated on VRBGA for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was plated on violet red bile glucose agar for quantitative recovery of Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,enumeration,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001233,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 5.0 x 10^3 CFU per millilitre.,The reported count for Clostridium perfringens was 5 point 0 times ten to the power of three C F U per millilitre.,microbiology,enumeration,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001234,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 1.5 x 10^1 CFU per gram.,Enumeration on Baird-Parker agar gave a calculated result of 1 point 5 times ten to the power of one C F U per gram.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001235,A volume of 10 mL was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,A volume of ten millilitres was plated on Baird-Parker agar for quantitative recovery of Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,enumeration,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar|CFU,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001236,"The urease test was performed on a pure culture, with an alkaline colour change caused by urea hydrolysis.","The urease was performed on a pure culture, with an alkaline colour change caused by urea hydrolysis.",microbiology,identification,urease test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001237,The isolate was tested using the oxidase test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the oxidase after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,oxidase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001238,"The MALDI-TOF identification was performed on a pure culture, with protein spectral matching for rapid microbial identification.","The MALDI T O F was performed on a pure culture, with protein spectral matching for rapid microbial identification.",microbiology,identification,MALDI-TOF identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001239,"Identification was supported by the API 20NE identification, which showed a biochemical profile used for non-enteric Gram-negative bacteria.","Identification was supported by the A P I twenty N E, which showed a biochemical profile used for non-enteric Gram-negative bacteria.",microbiology,identification,API 20NE identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001240,"Identification was supported by the citrate utilisation test, which showed growth with an alkaline colour shift when citrate is utilised.","Identification was supported by the citrate, which showed growth with an alkaline colour shift when citrate is utilised.",microbiology,identification,citrate utilisation test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001241,A repeat motility test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat motility was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,motility test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001242,The isolate was tested using the motility test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the motility after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,motility test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001243,A repeat citrate utilisation test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat citrate was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,citrate utilisation test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001244,Results from the urease test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the urease were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,urease test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001245,"The esculin hydrolysis test was performed on a pure culture, with darkening of the medium after esculin hydrolysis.","The esculin hydrolysis was performed on a pure culture, with darkening of the medium after esculin hydrolysis.",microbiology,identification,esculin hydrolysis test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001246,A repeat MALDI-TOF identification was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat MALDI T O F was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,MALDI-TOF identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001247,Results from the ONPG test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the O N P G were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,ONPG test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001248,"Identification was supported by the urease test, which showed an alkaline colour change caused by urea hydrolysis.","Identification was supported by the urease, which showed an alkaline colour change caused by urea hydrolysis.",microbiology,identification,urease test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001249,The isolate was tested using the urease test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the urease after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,urease test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001250,"Identification was supported by the MALDI-TOF identification, which showed protein spectral matching for rapid microbial identification.","Identification was supported by the MALDI T O F, which showed protein spectral matching for rapid microbial identification.",microbiology,identification,MALDI-TOF identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001251,Results from the oxidase test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the oxidase were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,oxidase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001252,The isolate was tested using the API 20E identification after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the A P I twenty E after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,API 20E identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001253,A repeat ONPG test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat O N P G was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,ONPG test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001254,"Identification was supported by the catalase test, which showed visible bubbling after hydrogen peroxide is added.","Identification was supported by the catalase, which showed visible bubbling after hydrogen peroxide is added.",microbiology,identification,catalase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001255,Results from the coagulase test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the coagulase were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,coagulase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001256,Results from the MALDI-TOF identification were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the MALDI T O F were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,MALDI-TOF identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001257,Results from the citrate utilisation test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the citrate were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,citrate utilisation test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001258,"The oxidase test was performed on a pure culture, with a rapid colour reaction that indicates cytochrome c oxidase activity.","The oxidase was performed on a pure culture, with a rapid colour reaction that indicates cytochrome c oxidase activity.",microbiology,identification,oxidase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001259,"Identification was supported by the nitrate reduction test, which showed evidence that nitrate has been reduced.","Identification was supported by the nitrate reduction, which showed evidence that nitrate has been reduced.",microbiology,identification,nitrate reduction test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001260,A repeat indole test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat indole was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,indole test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001261,Results from the motility test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the motility were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,motility test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001262,The isolate was tested using the catalase test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the catalase after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,catalase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001263,"Identification was supported by the oxidase test, which showed a rapid colour reaction that indicates cytochrome c oxidase activity.","Identification was supported by the oxidase, which showed a rapid colour reaction that indicates cytochrome c oxidase activity.",microbiology,identification,oxidase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001264,A repeat oxidase test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat oxidase was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,oxidase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001265,The isolate was tested using the esculin hydrolysis test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the esculin hydrolysis after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,esculin hydrolysis test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001266,The isolate was tested using the citrate utilisation test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the citrate after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,citrate utilisation test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001267,Results from the API 20NE identification were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the A P I twenty N E were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,API 20NE identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001268,A repeat catalase test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat catalase was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,catalase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001269,"The API 20E identification was performed on a pure culture, with a biochemical profile used for identification of Enterobacterales and related organisms.","The A P I twenty E was performed on a pure culture, with a biochemical profile used for identification of Enterobacterales and related organisms.",microbiology,identification,API 20E identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001270,"The indole test was performed on a pure culture, with detection of indole produced from tryptophan metabolism.","The indole was performed on a pure culture, with detection of indole produced from tryptophan metabolism.",microbiology,identification,indole test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001271,"The citrate utilisation test was performed on a pure culture, with growth with an alkaline colour shift when citrate is utilised.","The citrate was performed on a pure culture, with growth with an alkaline colour shift when citrate is utilised.",microbiology,identification,citrate utilisation test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001272,"Identification was supported by the coagulase test, which showed clot formation when coagulase activity is present.","Identification was supported by the coagulase, which showed clot formation when coagulase activity is present.",microbiology,identification,coagulase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001273,A repeat API 20NE identification was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat A P I twenty N E was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,API 20NE identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001274,The isolate was tested using the indole test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the indole after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,indole test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001275,"The motility test was performed on a pure culture, with diffuse growth away from the inoculation line.","The motility was performed on a pure culture, with diffuse growth away from the inoculation line.",microbiology,identification,motility test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001276,"The ONPG test was performed on a pure culture, with detection of beta-galactosidase activity.","The O N P G was performed on a pure culture, with detection of beta-galactosidase activity.",microbiology,identification,ONPG test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001277,Results from the catalase test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the catalase were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,catalase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001278,"Identification was supported by the motility test, which showed diffuse growth away from the inoculation line.","Identification was supported by the motility, which showed diffuse growth away from the inoculation line.",microbiology,identification,motility test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001279,The isolate was tested using the nitrate reduction test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the nitrate reduction after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,nitrate reduction test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001280,"The catalase test was performed on a pure culture, with visible bubbling after hydrogen peroxide is added.","The catalase was performed on a pure culture, with visible bubbling after hydrogen peroxide is added.",microbiology,identification,catalase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001281,"The nitrate reduction test was performed on a pure culture, with evidence that nitrate has been reduced.","The nitrate reduction was performed on a pure culture, with evidence that nitrate has been reduced.",microbiology,identification,nitrate reduction test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001282,"Identification was supported by the ONPG test, which showed detection of beta-galactosidase activity.","Identification was supported by the O N P G, which showed detection of beta-galactosidase activity.",microbiology,identification,ONPG test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001283,"The coagulase test was performed on a pure culture, with clot formation when coagulase activity is present.","The coagulase was performed on a pure culture, with clot formation when coagulase activity is present.",microbiology,identification,coagulase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001284,Results from the indole test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the indole were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,indole test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001285,Results from the esculin hydrolysis test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the esculin hydrolysis were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,esculin hydrolysis test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001286,The isolate was tested using the coagulase test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the coagulase after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,coagulase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001287,Results from the nitrate reduction test were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the nitrate reduction were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,nitrate reduction test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001288,The isolate was tested using the ONPG test after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the O N P G after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,ONPG test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001289,A repeat coagulase test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat coagulase was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,coagulase test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001290,"The API 20NE identification was performed on a pure culture, with a biochemical profile used for non-enteric Gram-negative bacteria.","The A P I twenty N E was performed on a pure culture, with a biochemical profile used for non-enteric Gram-negative bacteria.",microbiology,identification,API 20NE identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001291,Results from the API 20E identification were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,Results from the A P I twenty E were reviewed together with colony morphology and Gram reaction.,microbiology,identification,API 20E identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001292,A repeat nitrate reduction test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat nitrate reduction was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,nitrate reduction test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001293,The isolate was tested using the API 20NE identification after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the A P I twenty N E after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,API 20NE identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001294,"Identification was supported by the esculin hydrolysis test, which showed darkening of the medium after esculin hydrolysis.","Identification was supported by the esculin hydrolysis, which showed darkening of the medium after esculin hydrolysis.",microbiology,identification,esculin hydrolysis test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001295,A repeat esculin hydrolysis test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat esculin hydrolysis was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,esculin hydrolysis test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001296,"Identification was supported by the indole test, which showed detection of indole produced from tryptophan metabolism.","Identification was supported by the indole, which showed detection of indole produced from tryptophan metabolism.",microbiology,identification,indole test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001297,A repeat API 20E identification was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat A P I twenty E was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,API 20E identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001298,"Identification was supported by the API 20E identification, which showed a biochemical profile used for identification of Enterobacterales and related organisms.","Identification was supported by the A P I twenty E, which showed a biochemical profile used for identification of Enterobacterales and related organisms.",microbiology,identification,API 20E identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001299,The isolate was tested using the MALDI-TOF identification after purity had been confirmed.,The isolate was tested using the MALDI T O F after purity had been confirmed.,microbiology,identification,MALDI-TOF identification,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001300,A repeat urease test was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,A repeat urease was requested because the first reaction was difficult to interpret.,microbiology,identification,urease test,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001301,Cell morphology was reported as Gram-positive rods after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as Gram positive rods after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001302,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram-variable rods.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram variable rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001303,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001304,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram-negative curved rods.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram negative curved rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001305,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram-positive rods.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram positive rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001306,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of budding yeast cells.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of budding yeast cells.,microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001307,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001308,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001309,Cell morphology was reported as Gram-variable rods after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as Gram variable rods after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001310,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed budding yeast cells.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed budding yeast cells.,microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001311,Cell morphology was reported as budding yeast cells after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as budding yeast cells after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001312,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram-negative rods.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram negative rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001313,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram-negative rods.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram negative rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001314,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001315,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001316,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001317,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram-positive cocci.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram positive cocci.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001318,Cell morphology was reported as Gram-negative curved rods after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as Gram negative curved rods after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001319,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001320,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001321,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram-variable rods.,The Gram stain was repeated after the initial preparation showed Gram variable rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001322,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001323,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram-positive rods.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram positive rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001324,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram-negative curved rods.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram negative curved rods.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001325,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001326,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001327,Cell morphology was reported as Gram-negative rods after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as Gram negative rods after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001328,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001329,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001330,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001331,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001332,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001333,Cell morphology was reported as Gram-positive cocci after examination under oil immersion.,Cell morphology was reported as Gram positive cocci after examination under oil immersion.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001334,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001335,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001336,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001337,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001338,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001339,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with cocci in clusters visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001340,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001341,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001342,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative curved rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative curved rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative curved rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001343,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram-positive cocci.,A pure colony was selected before preparing the Gram stain for assessment of Gram positive cocci.,microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001344,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001345,"Microscopy showed Gram-variable rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram variable rods, with pleomorphic cells visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001346,"Microscopy showed Gram-variable rods, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram variable rods, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001347,"Microscopy showed Gram-variable rods, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram variable rods, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001348,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001349,"Microscopy showed Gram-negative rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram negative rods, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-negative rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001350,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001351,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001352,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive rods, with short rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive rods, with short rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001353,"Microscopy showed Gram-positive cocci, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram positive cocci, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-positive cocci|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001354,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with spore-forming rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001355,"Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with long rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed budding yeast cells, with long rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,budding yeast cells|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001356,"Microscopy showed Gram-variable rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram variable rods, with curved rods visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001357,"Microscopy showed Gram-variable rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.","Microscopy showed Gram variable rods, with cocci in chains visible in several fields.",microbiology,microscopy,Gram-variable rods|Gram stain,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001358,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from genomic DNA.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from genomic D N A.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001359,The result from antimicrobial resistance gene was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from antimicrobial resistance gene was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001360,The sample was processed for primer design after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for primer design after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001361,The sample was processed for gel electrophoresis after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for gel electrophoresis after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001362,The sample was processed for polymerase chain reaction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for P C R after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001363,The result from open reading frame was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from open reading frame was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001364,The laboratory repeated messenger RNA because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated messenger R N A because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001365,The sample was processed for amplicon sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for amplicon sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001366,The result from agarose gel electrophoresis was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from agarose gel electrophoresis was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001367,"The agarose gel electrophoresis workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The agarose gel electrophoresis workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001368,The laboratory repeated quantitative PCR because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated Q P C R because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001369,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from gel electrophoresis.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001370,A clean work area was prepared before starting gel electrophoresis to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting gel electrophoresis to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001371,The sample was processed for minimum inhibitory concentration after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for minimum inhibitory concentration after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001372,The laboratory repeated plasmid extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated plasmid extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001373,The sample was processed for metagenomic sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for metagenomic sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001374,The sample was processed for single nucleotide polymorphism after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for single nucleotide polymorphism after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001375,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from restriction digestion.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from restriction digestion.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001376,The laboratory repeated genomic DNA because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated genomic D N A because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001377,The result from gel electrophoresis was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from gel electrophoresis was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001378,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from agarose gel electrophoresis.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from agarose gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001379,A clean work area was prepared before starting plasmid extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting plasmid extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001380,The result from quantitative PCR was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from Q P C R was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001381,The result from minimum inhibitory concentration was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from minimum inhibitory concentration was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001382,The laboratory repeated DNA extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated D N A extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001383,"The whole genome sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The whole genome sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001384,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from single nucleotide polymorphism.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from single nucleotide polymorphism.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001385,The result from single nucleotide polymorphism was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from single nucleotide polymorphism was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001386,The sample was processed for ribosomal RNA after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for ribosomal R N A after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001387,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from Sanger sequencing.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001388,A clean work area was prepared before starting metagenomic sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting metagenomic sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001389,The laboratory repeated primer design because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated primer design because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001390,The laboratory repeated polymerase chain reaction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated P C R because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001391,The sample was processed for single nucleotide variant after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for single nucleotide variant after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001392,The laboratory repeated beta-lactamase gene because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated beta lactamase gene because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001393,A clean work area was prepared before starting complementary DNA to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting complementary D N A to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001394,A clean work area was prepared before starting restriction digestion to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting restriction digestion to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001395,"The quantitative PCR workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The Q P C R workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001396,"The open reading frame workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The open reading frame workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001397,"The Sanger sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The Sanger sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001398,The laboratory repeated single nucleotide variant because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated single nucleotide variant because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001399,The laboratory repeated open reading frame because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated open reading frame because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001400,The result from DNA extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from D N A extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001401,The result from DNA ligation was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from D N A ligation was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001402,The laboratory repeated agarose gel electrophoresis because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated agarose gel electrophoresis because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001403,A clean work area was prepared before starting DNA extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting D N A extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001404,A clean work area was prepared before starting amplicon sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting amplicon sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001405,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from quantitative PCR.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from Q P C R.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001406,The laboratory repeated ribosomal RNA because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated ribosomal R N A because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001407,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from DNA ligation.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from D N A ligation.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001408,A clean work area was prepared before starting genomic DNA to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting genomic D N A to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001409,A clean work area was prepared before starting quantitative PCR to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting Q P C R to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001410,A clean work area was prepared before starting messenger RNA to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting messenger R N A to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001411,The sample was processed for reverse transcription PCR after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for reverse transcription P C R after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001412,"The 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001413,"The single nucleotide variant workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The single nucleotide variant workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001414,A clean work area was prepared before starting single nucleotide variant to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting single nucleotide variant to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001415,The result from beta-lactamase gene was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from beta lactamase gene was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001416,A clean work area was prepared before starting reverse transcription PCR to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting reverse transcription P C R to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001417,The result from polymerase chain reaction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from P C R was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001418,A clean work area was prepared before starting minimum inhibitory concentration to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting minimum inhibitory concentration to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001419,The result from complementary DNA was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from complementary D N A was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001420,The sample was processed for whole genome sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for whole genome sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001421,"The complementary DNA workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The complementary D N A workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001422,The result from amplicon sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from amplicon sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001423,A clean work area was prepared before starting polymerase chain reaction to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting P C R to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001424,"The plasmid extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The plasmid extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001425,A clean work area was prepared before starting RNA extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting R N A extraction to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001426,The sample was processed for RNA extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for R N A extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001427,The laboratory repeated complementary DNA because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated complementary D N A because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001428,"The single nucleotide polymorphism workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The single nucleotide polymorphism workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001429,The laboratory repeated antimicrobial resistance gene because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated antimicrobial resistance gene because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001430,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from whole genome sequencing.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001431,"The DNA ligation workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The D N A ligation workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001432,"The metagenomic sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The metagenomic sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001433,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from antimicrobial resistance gene.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from antimicrobial resistance gene.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001434,The laboratory repeated gel electrophoresis because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated gel electrophoresis because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001435,The sample was processed for antimicrobial resistance gene after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for antimicrobial resistance gene after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001436,A clean work area was prepared before starting primer design to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting primer design to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001437,"The restriction digestion workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The restriction digestion workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001438,The sample was processed for complementary DNA after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for complementary D N A after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001439,The laboratory repeated single nucleotide polymorphism because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated single nucleotide polymorphism because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001440,"The ribosomal RNA workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The ribosomal R N A workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001441,A clean work area was prepared before starting Sanger sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting Sanger sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001442,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from amplicon sequencing.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001443,The sample was processed for quantitative PCR after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for Q P C R after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001444,"The amplicon sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The amplicon sequencing workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001445,A clean work area was prepared before starting DNA ligation to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting D N A ligation to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001446,The sample was processed for 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001447,The result from primer design was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from primer design was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001448,The laboratory repeated whole genome sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated whole genome sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001449,The laboratory repeated minimum inhibitory concentration because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated minimum inhibitory concentration because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001450,The sample was processed for messenger RNA after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for messenger R N A after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001451,The result from Sanger sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from Sanger sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001452,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from beta-lactamase gene.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from beta lactamase gene.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001453,"The beta-lactamase gene workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The beta lactamase gene workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001454,A clean work area was prepared before starting 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001455,The result from single nucleotide variant was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from single nucleotide variant was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001456,The sample was processed for Sanger sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for Sanger sequencing after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001457,"The messenger RNA workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The messenger R N A workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001458,"The primer design workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The primer design workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001459,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from RNA extraction.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001460,The result from restriction digestion was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from restriction digestion was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001461,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from open reading frame.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from open reading frame.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001462,A clean work area was prepared before starting single nucleotide polymorphism to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting single nucleotide polymorphism to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide polymorphism,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001463,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from DNA extraction.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001464,"The RNA extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The R N A extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001465,The sample was processed for beta-lactamase gene after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for beta lactamase gene after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001466,The result from whole genome sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from whole genome sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001467,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from polymerase chain reaction.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from P C R.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001468,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from messenger RNA.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from messenger R N A.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001469,"The antimicrobial resistance gene workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The antimicrobial resistance gene workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001470,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001471,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from plasmid extraction.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from plasmid extraction.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001472,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from metagenomic sequencing.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001473,The sample was processed for DNA extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for D N A extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001474,A clean work area was prepared before starting whole genome sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting whole genome sequencing to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001475,The laboratory repeated DNA ligation because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated D N A ligation because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001476,The sample was processed for open reading frame after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for open reading frame after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001477,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from reverse transcription PCR.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001478,A clean work area was prepared before starting antimicrobial resistance gene to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting antimicrobial resistance gene to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,antimicrobial resistance gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001479,The laboratory repeated 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001480,The laboratory repeated restriction digestion because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated restriction digestion because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001481,The laboratory repeated metagenomic sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated metagenomic sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001482,The result from ribosomal RNA was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from ribosomal R N A was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001483,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from ribosomal RNA.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from ribosomal R N A.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001484,The laboratory repeated amplicon sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated amplicon sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001485,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from primer design.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from primer design.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001486,The laboratory repeated reverse transcription PCR because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated reverse transcription P C R because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001487,The laboratory repeated Sanger sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated Sanger sequencing because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001488,The laboratory repeated RNA extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,The laboratory repeated R N A extraction because the control result did not meet acceptance criteria.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001489,The sample was processed for genomic DNA after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for genomic D N A after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001490,"The gel electrophoresis workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The gel electrophoresis workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001491,A clean work area was prepared before starting agarose gel electrophoresis to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting agarose gel electrophoresis to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001492,"The minimum inhibitory concentration workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The minimum inhibitory concentration workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001493,The sample was processed for DNA ligation after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for D N A ligation after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA ligation,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001494,The result from plasmid extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from plasmid extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001495,"The polymerase chain reaction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The P C R workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001496,"The DNA extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The D N A extraction workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001497,"The genomic DNA workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The genomic D N A workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001498,"The reverse transcription PCR workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.","The reverse transcription P C R workflow included a negative control, a positive control, and the test samples.",molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001499,The result from messenger RNA was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from messenger R N A was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,messenger RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001500,The sample was processed for restriction digestion after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for restriction digestion after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,restriction digestion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001501,A clean work area was prepared before starting beta-lactamase gene to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting beta lactamase gene to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,beta-lactamase gene,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001502,The result from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001503,A clean work area was prepared before starting ribosomal RNA to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting ribosomal R N A to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,ribosomal RNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001504,The result from reverse transcription PCR was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from reverse transcription P C R was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001505,The result from metagenomic sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from metagenomic sequencing was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001506,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from minimum inhibitory concentration.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from minimum inhibitory concentration.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001507,The result from RNA extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from R N A extraction was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001508,The result from genomic DNA was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,The result from genomic D N A was compared with the expected control pattern before release.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,genomic DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001509,The sample was processed for agarose gel electrophoresis after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for agarose gel electrophoresis after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,agarose gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001510,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from single nucleotide variant.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from single nucleotide variant.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,single nucleotide variant,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001511,A clean work area was prepared before starting open reading frame to reduce the risk of contamination.,A clean work area was prepared before starting open reading frame to reduce the risk of contamination.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,open reading frame,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001512,The sample was processed for plasmid extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,The sample was processed for plasmid extraction after nucleic acid concentration had been checked.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,plasmid extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001513,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from complementary DNA.,Quality control was reviewed before interpreting the results from complementary D N A.,molecular_biology,molecular_methods,complementary DNA,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001514,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001515,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001516,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001517,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001518,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during DNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001519,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001520,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001521,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001522,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during whole genome sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001523,No amplification was observed in the negative control during metagenomic sequencing.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001524,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001525,The positive control produced the expected signal during whole genome sequencing.,The positive control produced the expected signal during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001526,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001527,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001528,The sample was diluted before gel electrophoresis because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before gel electrophoresis because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001529,The nucleic acid concentration before 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001530,The sample was diluted before DNA extraction because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before D N A extraction because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001531,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001532,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001533,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001534,No amplification was observed in the negative control during polymerase chain reaction.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001535,The nucleic acid concentration before polymerase chain reaction was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before P C R was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001536,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001537,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001538,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001539,The positive control produced the expected signal during DNA extraction.,The positive control produced the expected signal during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001540,The sample was diluted before Sanger sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before Sanger sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001541,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001542,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001543,The expected product from primer design was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from primer design was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001544,The sample was diluted before amplicon sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before amplicon sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001545,The sample was diluted before whole genome sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before whole genome sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001546,The positive control produced the expected signal during RNA extraction.,The positive control produced the expected signal during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001547,The positive control produced the expected signal during polymerase chain reaction.,The positive control produced the expected signal during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001548,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001549,The nucleic acid concentration before metagenomic sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before metagenomic sequencing was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001550,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001551,No amplification was observed in the negative control during quantitative PCR.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001552,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001553,The sample was diluted before RNA extraction because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before R N A extraction because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001554,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001555,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001556,No amplification was observed in the negative control during gel electrophoresis.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001557,The expected product from DNA extraction was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from D N A extraction was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001558,The sample was diluted before reverse transcription PCR because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before reverse transcription P C R because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001559,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001560,The sample was diluted before metagenomic sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before metagenomic sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001561,The expected product from primer design was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,The expected product from primer design was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001562,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001563,The expected product from quantitative PCR was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Q P C R was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001564,No amplification was observed in the negative control during RNA extraction.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001565,The positive control produced the expected signal during gel electrophoresis.,The positive control produced the expected signal during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001566,The expected product from DNA extraction was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from D N A extraction was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001567,No amplification was observed in the negative control during reverse transcription PCR.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001568,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001569,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during DNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001570,The sample was diluted before quantitative PCR because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before Q P C R because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001571,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001572,The expected product from primer design was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from primer design was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001573,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001574,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001575,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001576,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001577,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001578,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during amplicon sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001579,The positive control produced the expected signal during primer design.,The positive control produced the expected signal during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001580,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001581,The nucleic acid concentration before polymerase chain reaction was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before P C R was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001582,The positive control produced the expected signal during quantitative PCR.,The positive control produced the expected signal during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001583,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001584,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001585,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001586,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001587,The sample was diluted before primer design because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before primer design because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001588,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001589,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001590,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001591,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription PCR was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription P C R was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001592,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001593,The positive control produced the expected signal during metagenomic sequencing.,The positive control produced the expected signal during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001594,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001595,The sample was diluted before polymerase chain reaction because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before P C R because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001596,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001597,No amplification was observed in the negative control during whole genome sequencing.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001598,The positive control produced the expected signal during amplicon sequencing.,The positive control produced the expected signal during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001599,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001600,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001601,No amplification was observed in the negative control during amplicon sequencing.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001602,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001603,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001604,No amplification was observed in the negative control during DNA extraction.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001605,The nucleic acid concentration before DNA extraction was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before D N A extraction was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001606,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001607,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001608,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001609,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001610,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001611,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001612,No amplification was observed in the negative control during Sanger sequencing.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001613,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription PCR was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription P C R was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001614,The expected product from polymerase chain reaction was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from P C R was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001615,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001616,The nucleic acid concentration before polymerase chain reaction was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before P C R was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001617,The expected product from polymerase chain reaction was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,The expected product from P C R was approximately 400 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001618,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001619,The nucleic acid concentration before RNA extraction was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before R N A extraction was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001620,The positive control produced the expected signal during Sanger sequencing.,The positive control produced the expected signal during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001621,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001622,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during DNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001623,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001624,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001625,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001626,The positive control produced the expected signal during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,The positive control produced the expected signal during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001627,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001628,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001629,The nucleic acid concentration before RNA extraction was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before R N A extraction was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001630,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001631,The nucleic acid concentration before DNA extraction was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before D N A extraction was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001632,No amplification was observed in the negative control during primer design.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001633,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during amplicon sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001634,The nucleic acid concentration before DNA extraction was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before D N A extraction was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001635,The nucleic acid concentration before 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001636,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription PCR was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription P C R was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001637,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001638,The nucleic acid concentration before 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001639,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during amplicon sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001640,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001641,The expected product from polymerase chain reaction was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from P C R was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001642,The expected product from DNA extraction was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from D N A extraction was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001643,The nucleic acid concentration before RNA extraction was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before R N A extraction was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001644,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001645,The nucleic acid concentration before RNA extraction was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before R N A extraction was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001646,The positive control produced the expected signal during reverse transcription PCR.,The positive control produced the expected signal during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001647,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001648,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001649,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001650,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001651,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001652,The expected product from DNA extraction was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,The expected product from D N A extraction was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001653,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before whole genome sequencing was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001654,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during whole genome sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001655,The expected product from quantitative PCR was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Q P C R was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001656,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001657,The nucleic acid concentration before 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001658,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001659,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001660,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during amplicon sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001661,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001662,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001663,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001664,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001665,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001666,The nucleic acid concentration before DNA extraction was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before D N A extraction was 10 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001667,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001668,The expected product from polymerase chain reaction was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from P C R was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001669,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001670,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from whole genome sequencing was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001671,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001672,The expected product from primer design was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from primer design was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001673,The sample was diluted before 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,The sample was diluted before sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing because the nucleic acid concentration exceeded the working range.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001674,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001675,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 20 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001676,The nucleic acid concentration before polymerase chain reaction was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before P C R was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001677,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001678,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001679,The nucleic acid concentration before polymerase chain reaction was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before P C R was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001680,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001681,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 150 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001682,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001683,The nucleic acid concentration before metagenomic sequencing was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before metagenomic sequencing was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001684,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001685,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001686,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during whole genome sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001687,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription PCR was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before reverse transcription P C R was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001688,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 500 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001689,No amplification was observed in the negative control during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,No amplification was observed in the negative control during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001690,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001691,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001692,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001693,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 20 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001694,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001695,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001696,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during RNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during R N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001697,The expected product from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,The expected product from sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing was approximately 200 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001698,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during sixteen S ribosomal R N A sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,16S ribosomal RNA sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001699,The expected product from polymerase chain reaction was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,The expected product from P C R was approximately 1000 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001700,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001701,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from gel electrophoresis was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001702,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001703,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during gel electrophoresis.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during gel electrophoresis.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001704,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during amplicon sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during amplicon sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001705,The nucleic acid concentration before DNA extraction was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before D N A extraction was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001706,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 50 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001707,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 100 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001708,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 75 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001709,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 30 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001710,The nucleic acid concentration before RNA extraction was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before R N A extraction was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001711,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001712,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 32 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty two during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001713,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during reverse transcription PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during reverse transcription P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001714,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 200 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001715,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before gel electrophoresis was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,gel electrophoresis,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001716,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001717,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during whole genome sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during whole genome sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,whole genome sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001718,The nucleic acid concentration before quantitative PCR was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Q P C R was 150 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001719,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before Sanger sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001720,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during primer design.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during primer design.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001721,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 28 during Sanger sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty eight during Sanger sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001722,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from metagenomic sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001723,The expected product from RNA extraction was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,The expected product from R N A extraction was approximately 300 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,RNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001724,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Sanger sequencing was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,Sanger sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001725,The expected product from reverse transcription PCR was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,The expected product from reverse transcription P C R was approximately 100 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,reverse transcription PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001726,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before primer design was 25 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,primer design,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001727,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 25 during DNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty five during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001728,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 38 during metagenomic sequencing.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty eight during metagenomic sequencing.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,metagenomic sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001729,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 22 during quantitative PCR.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle twenty two during Q P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001730,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,The expected product from amplicon sequencing was approximately 250 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001731,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 18 during polymerase chain reaction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle eighteen during P C R.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001732,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,The nucleic acid concentration before amplicon sequencing was 5 nanograms per microlitre.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,amplicon sequencing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001733,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle 35 during DNA extraction.,The amplification threshold was observed at cycle thirty five during D N A extraction.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,DNA extraction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001734,The expected product from quantitative PCR was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,The expected product from Q P C R was approximately 750 base pairs in length.,molecular_biology,quantitative_molecular,quantitative PCR,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001735,The ethanol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The ethanol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,ethanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001736,A new batch of sodium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of sodium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,sodium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001737,The hydrogen peroxide solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The hydrogen peroxide solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,hydrogen peroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001738,The concentration of acetic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of acetic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,acetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001739,A new batch of Tris buffer solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of Tris buffer solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,Tris buffer,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001740,The concentration of ammonium sulfate was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of ammonium sulfate was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,ammonium sulfate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001741,The concentration of ethanol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of ethanol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,ethanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001742,The working solution of potassium phosphate was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of potassium phosphate was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,potassium phosphate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001743,The concentration of potassium phosphate was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of potassium phosphate was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,potassium phosphate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001744,The methanol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The methanol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,methanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001745,The citric acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The citric acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,citric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001746,The pH was measured after calcium chloride had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after calcium chloride had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,calcium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001747,The concentration of hydrogen peroxide was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of hydrogen peroxide was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,hydrogen peroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001748,The concentration of methanol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of methanol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,methanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001749,The concentration of calcium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of calcium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,calcium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001750,The pH was measured after lactic acid had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after lactic acid had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,lactic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001751,The concentration of lactic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of lactic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,lactic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001752,The ammonium sulfate solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The ammonium sulfate solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,ammonium sulfate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001753,The hydrochloric acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The hydrochloric acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,hydrochloric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001754,A new batch of magnesium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of magnesium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,magnesium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001755,The potassium phosphate solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The potassium phosphate solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,potassium phosphate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001756,A new batch of hydrochloric acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of hydrochloric acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,hydrochloric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001757,The pH was measured after methanol had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after methanol had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,methanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001758,The working solution of methanol was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of methanol was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,methanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001759,The concentration of lactose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of lactose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,lactose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001760,The concentration of sodium hydroxide was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of sodium hydroxide was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,sodium hydroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001761,The pH was measured after ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001762,The Tris buffer solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The Tris buffer solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,Tris buffer,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001763,A new batch of sodium hydroxide solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of sodium hydroxide solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,sodium hydroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001764,The magnesium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The magnesium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,magnesium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001765,A new batch of lactose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of lactose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,lactose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001766,The pH was measured after mannitol had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after mannitol had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,mannitol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001767,The working solution of lactose was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of lactose was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,lactose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001768,The lactose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The lactose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,lactose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001769,The working solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,hydrogen peroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001770,The concentration of sodium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of sodium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,sodium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001771,The working solution of mannitol was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of mannitol was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,mannitol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001772,The concentration of sucrose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of sucrose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,sucrose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001773,The concentration of glucose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of glucose was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,glucose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001774,The pH was measured after phosphate-buffered saline had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after phosphate buffered saline had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,phosphate-buffered saline,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001775,The working solution of acetic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of acetic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,acetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001776,The pH was measured after Tris buffer had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after Tris buffer had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,Tris buffer,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001777,The pH was measured after sodium hydroxide had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after sodium hydroxide had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,sodium hydroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001778,The working solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,hydrochloric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001779,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,phosphate-buffered saline,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001780,The working solution of phosphate-buffered saline was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of phosphate buffered saline was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,phosphate-buffered saline,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001781,The mannitol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The mannitol solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,mannitol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001782,The pH was measured after ethanol had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after ethanol had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,ethanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001783,A new batch of potassium phosphate solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of potassium phosphate solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,potassium phosphate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001784,The working solution of sucrose was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of sucrose was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,sucrose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001785,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001786,A new batch of calcium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of calcium chloride solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,calcium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001787,A new batch of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001788,The pH was measured after acetic acid had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after acetic acid had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,acetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001789,The pH was measured after citric acid had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after citric acid had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,citric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001790,A new batch of hydrogen peroxide solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of hydrogen peroxide solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,hydrogen peroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001791,A new batch of ammonium sulfate solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of ammonium sulfate solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,ammonium sulfate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001792,The pH was measured after lactose had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after lactose had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,lactose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001793,The working solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001794,The working solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,sodium hydroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001795,A new batch of citric acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of citric acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,citric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001796,The pH was measured after hydrogen peroxide had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after hydrogen peroxide had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,hydrogen peroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001797,A new batch of lactic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of lactic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,lactic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001798,The working solution of sodium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of sodium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,sodium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001799,The working solution of ethanol was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of ethanol was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,ethanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001800,The working solution of lactic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of lactic acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,lactic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001801,The concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001802,The working solution of Tris buffer was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of Tris buffer was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,Tris buffer,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001803,A new batch of glucose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of glucose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,glucose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001804,The pH was measured after sodium chloride had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after sodium chloride had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,sodium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001805,The concentration of Tris buffer was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of Tris buffer was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,Tris buffer,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001806,The concentration of citric acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of citric acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,citric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001807,A new batch of methanol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of methanol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,methanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001808,The pH was measured after glucose had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after glucose had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,glucose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001809,A new batch of ethanol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of ethanol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,ethanol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001810,The concentration of mannitol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of mannitol was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,mannitol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001811,The working solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,ammonium sulfate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001812,The working solution of glucose was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of glucose was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,glucose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001813,A new batch of phosphate-buffered saline solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of phosphate buffered saline solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,phosphate-buffered saline,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001814,The working solution of magnesium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of magnesium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,magnesium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001815,The pH was measured after potassium phosphate had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after potassium phosphate had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,potassium phosphate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001816,The calcium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The calcium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,calcium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001817,The pH was measured after sucrose had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after sucrose had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,sucrose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001818,The concentration of hydrochloric acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of hydrochloric acid was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,hydrochloric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001819,The pH was measured after hydrochloric acid had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after hydrochloric acid had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,hydrochloric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001820,The concentration of magnesium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of magnesium chloride was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,magnesium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001821,The working solution of calcium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of calcium chloride was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,calcium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001822,A new batch of mannitol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of mannitol solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,mannitol,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001823,A new batch of sucrose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of sucrose solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,sucrose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001824,The lactic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The lactic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,lactic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001825,The sodium hydroxide solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The sodium hydroxide solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,sodium hydroxide,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001826,The sucrose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The sucrose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,sucrose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001827,The glucose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The glucose solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,glucose,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001828,The working solution of citric acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,The working solution of citric acid was prepared using freshly purified water.,chemistry,reagents,citric acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001829,The pH was measured after magnesium chloride had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after magnesium chloride had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,magnesium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001830,The sodium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The sodium chloride solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,sodium chloride,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001831,The concentration of phosphate-buffered saline was checked before the reagent was released for use.,The concentration of phosphate buffered saline was checked before the reagent was released for use.,chemistry,reagents,phosphate-buffered saline,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001832,The acetic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,The acetic acid solution was mixed until the material had fully dissolved.,chemistry,reagents,acetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001833,The pH was measured after ammonium sulfate had been added to the preparation.,The pH was measured after ammonium sulfate had been added to the preparation.,chemistry,reagents,ammonium sulfate,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001834,A new batch of acetic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,A new batch of acetic acid solution was labelled with the preparation date and expiry date.,chemistry,reagents,acetic acid,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001835,A 10 mg/mL solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001836,A volume of 1 mL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001837,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of phosphate-buffered saline.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of phosphate buffered saline.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001838,A volume of 100 uL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001839,A volume of 100 mL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001840,The reagent blank containing hydrochloric acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing hydrochloric acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001841,A 0.9% solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001842,The reagent blank containing potassium phosphate remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing potassium phosphate remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001843,A 1% solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001844,The final pH was 6.0 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 6 point 0 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001845,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.5 before use.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001846,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001847,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001848,A 10 mg/mL solution of Tris buffer was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of Tris buffer was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001849,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001850,A volume of 100 mL of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001851,The final pH was 7.4 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 7 point 4 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001852,A volume of 100 uL of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001853,The final pH was 8.0 after addition of lactic acid.,The final P H was 8 point 0 after addition of lactic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001854,A volume of 100 uL of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001855,A volume of 10 mL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001856,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001857,The reagent blank containing acetic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing acetic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001858,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001859,The reagent blank containing sodium hydroxide remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing sodium hydroxide remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001860,The reagent blank containing methanol remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing methanol remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001861,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001862,A volume of 10 uL of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001863,A 1 M solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001864,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001865,A volume of 50 uL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001866,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001867,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of lactose.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of lactose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001868,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001869,A volume of 500 uL of the magnesium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the magnesium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001870,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001871,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of sodium chloride.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of sodium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001872,A volume of 10 mL of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001873,A 5% solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001874,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001875,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001876,The lactose solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The lactose solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001877,A 1% solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001878,The mannitol solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The mannitol solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001879,A volume of 100 mL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001880,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of sodium chloride.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of sodium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001881,The reagent blank containing ethanol remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing ethanol remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001882,A volume of 10 mL of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001883,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_001884,The reagent blank containing lactic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing lactic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001885,The glucose solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The glucose solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001886,The reagent blank containing magnesium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing magnesium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001887,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001888,A 5% solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001889,A 50 ug/mL solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001890,The ethanol solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The ethanol solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001891,The reagent blank containing mannitol remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing mannitol remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001892,A volume of 25 mL of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001893,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001894,A volume of 1 mL of the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001895,A 100 mM solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001896,A 10 mM solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001897,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of sucrose.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of sucrose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001898,A 10 mg/mL solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001899,The reagent blank containing Tris buffer remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing Tris buffer remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001900,The reagent blank containing glucose remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing glucose remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001901,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001902,A 50 mM solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001903,A volume of 0.1 mL of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001904,A volume of 100 mL of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001905,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001906,A volume of 10 mL of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001907,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001908,The ethanol solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The ethanol solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001909,A volume of 100 uL of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001910,A 5% solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001911,A volume of 500 uL of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001912,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of hydrochloric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001913,A 0.5 M solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001914,A 10 mg/mL solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001915,The final pH was 6.0 after addition of acetic acid.,The final P H was 6 point 0 after addition of acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001916,A volume of 500 uL of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001917,A 1% solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of hydrochloric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001918,A 10 mM solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001919,The final pH was 8.0 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 8 point 0 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001920,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001921,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001922,The final pH was 4.5 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 4 point 5 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001923,The sodium hydroxide solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The sodium hydroxide solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001924,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of calcium chloride.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of calcium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001925,The calcium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The calcium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001926,The final pH was 7.4 after addition of ethanol.,The final P H was 7 point 4 after addition of ethanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001927,A volume of 100 mL of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001928,The reagent blank containing ammonium sulfate remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing ammonium sulfate remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001929,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001930,A volume of 25 mL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001931,A 1 M solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001932,The mannitol solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The mannitol solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001933,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of citric acid.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of citric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001934,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001935,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001936,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001937,The citric acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The citric acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001938,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001939,The final pH was 8.0 after addition of mannitol.,The final P H was 8 point 0 after addition of mannitol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001940,The final pH was 7.2 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 7 point 2 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001941,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001942,A volume of 10 uL of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001943,A 0.9% solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001944,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001945,A 50 mM solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001946,A 50 ug/mL solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001947,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 7.5 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001948,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 9 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001949,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001950,The sucrose solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The sucrose solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001951,A volume of 25 mL of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001952,The reagent blank containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001953,A 0.5 M solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001954,The final pH was 6.5 after addition of mannitol.,The final P H was 6 point 5 after addition of mannitol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001955,The lactose solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The lactose solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001956,The reagent blank containing hydrogen peroxide remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing hydrogen peroxide remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001957,A volume of 100 uL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001958,A 100 mM solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_001959,A volume of 10 mL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001960,A 10 mM solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001961,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of methanol.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of methanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001962,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of methanol.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of methanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001963,The final pH was 7.5 after addition of potassium phosphate.,The final P H was 7 point 5 after addition of potassium phosphate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001964,A 1% solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001965,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of sodium chloride.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of sodium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001966,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of potassium phosphate.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of potassium phosphate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001967,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001968,A 100 mM solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001969,A volume of 100 uL of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001970,The citric acid solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The citric acid solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001971,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of sucrose.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of sucrose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001972,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001973,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001974,A volume of 1 mL of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001975,A 100 mM solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001976,The final pH was 7.5 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 7 point 5 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001977,A volume of 1 mL of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001978,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of citric acid.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of citric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001979,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 8.5 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001980,The methanol solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The methanol solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001981,A 50 mM solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001982,A 10 mg/mL solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001983,The reagent blank containing sucrose remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing sucrose remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001984,A volume of 25 mL of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001985,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001986,A volume of 500 uL of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001987,The final pH was 7.2 after addition of citric acid.,The final P H was 7 point 2 after addition of citric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001988,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001989,A volume of 500 uL of the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001990,A volume of 25 mL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001991,A 0.5 M solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001992,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001993,The final pH was 7.5 after addition of citric acid.,The final P H was 7 point 5 after addition of citric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001994,The lactose solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The lactose solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001995,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001996,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001997,A 10 mM solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001998,A volume of 50 uL of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_001999,A volume of 100 mL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002000,The final pH was 7.5 after addition of lactose.,The final P H was 7 point 5 after addition of lactose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002001,A 0.9% solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002002,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 before use.,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to P H 9 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002003,A volume of 10 uL of the ethanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the ethanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002004,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002005,A 0.5 M solution of phosphate-buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of phosphate buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002006,A 0.9% solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002007,The sucrose solution was adjusted to pH 8.5 before use.,The sucrose solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002008,The final pH was 6.0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 6 point 0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002009,A volume of 100 mL of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002010,A 50 mM solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of sodium hydroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002011,A volume of 0.1 mL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002012,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002013,The reagent blank containing sodium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing sodium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002014,The reagent blank containing phosphate-buffered saline remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing phosphate buffered saline remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002015,The final pH was 7.2 after addition of acetic acid.,The final P H was 7 point 2 after addition of acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002016,A 5% solution of acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002017,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002018,A volume of 50 uL of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002019,A volume of 10 uL of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the calcium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002020,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002021,A volume of 10 mL of the lactic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the lactic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002022,A 50 ug/mL solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002023,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002024,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 7.5 before use.,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002025,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002026,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002027,A 50 ug/mL solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002028,A volume of 100 uL of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002029,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 7.2 before use.,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 2 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002030,A volume of 50 uL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002031,A volume of 0.1 mL of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002032,The mannitol solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The mannitol solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002033,A 100 mM solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002034,A 0.9% solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002035,A volume of 50 uL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002036,The final pH was 8.0 after addition of magnesium chloride.,The final P H was 8 point 0 after addition of magnesium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002037,A 5% solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002038,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002039,The reagent blank containing lactose remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing lactose remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002040,A 1% solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002041,A volume of 50 uL of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the potassium phosphate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002042,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002043,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002044,The sucrose solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The sucrose solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002045,The final pH was 4.5 after addition of phosphate-buffered saline.,The final P H was 4 point 5 after addition of phosphate buffered saline.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002046,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002047,The final pH was 6.5 after addition of Tris buffer.,The final P H was 6 point 5 after addition of Tris buffer.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002048,A 10 mg/mL solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002049,A volume of 25 mL of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002050,A 50 mM solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002051,The final pH was 7.2 after addition of sucrose.,The final P H was 7 point 2 after addition of sucrose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002052,A 1 M solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002053,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002054,A volume of 50 uL of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of fifty microlitres of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002055,A volume of 1 mL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002056,A 5% solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002057,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002058,A 1 M solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002059,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 before use.,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to P H 9 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002060,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002061,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The hydrochloric acid solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002062,The final pH was 6.0 after addition of magnesium chloride.,The final P H was 6 point 0 after addition of magnesium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002063,The ethanol solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 before use.,The ethanol solution was adjusted to P H 9 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002064,The lactose solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The lactose solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002065,The final pH was 8.0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 8 point 0 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002066,A 50 mM solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002067,The final pH was 7.4 after addition of mannitol.,The final P H was 7 point 4 after addition of mannitol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002068,A 50 mM solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002069,A volume of 10 mL of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002070,A 10 mg/mL solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002071,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002072,A 0.5 M solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002073,A 10 mM solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002074,A 0.5 M solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002075,A 1 M solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of calcium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002076,The ethanol solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The ethanol solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002077,A 1% solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002078,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002079,A volume of 10 uL of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the methanol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002080,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of methanol.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of methanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002081,The glucose solution was adjusted to pH 4.0 before use.,The glucose solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002082,A volume of 100 mL of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002083,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of citric acid.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of citric acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002084,A volume of 1 mL of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the hydrochloric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrochloric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002085,The phosphate-buffered saline solution was adjusted to pH 8.5 before use.,The phosphate buffered saline solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002086,A 50 mM solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty millimolar solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002087,A volume of 10 mL of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the lactose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002088,A 5% solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002089,The final pH was 4.5 after addition of ethanol.,The final P H was 4 point 5 after addition of ethanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002090,The final pH was 4.5 after addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.,The final P H was 4 point 5 after addition of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002091,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of methanol.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of methanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002092,A 0.5 M solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002093,The final pH was 6.5 after addition of calcium chloride.,The final P H was 6 point 5 after addition of calcium chloride.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002094,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002095,A 0.9% solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002096,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002097,A volume of 10 uL of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002098,The hydrogen peroxide solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The hydrogen peroxide solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002099,A volume of 0.1 mL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002100,A volume of 10 uL of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the sodium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002101,A 1% solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002102,A 100 mM solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of lactic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002103,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 before use.,The Tris buffer solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002104,The final pH was 6.5 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 6 point 5 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002105,The sodium hydroxide solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The sodium hydroxide solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002106,The reagent blank containing calcium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing calcium chloride remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,calcium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002107,A volume of 10 uL of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002108,A 0.5 M solution of acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002109,A 100 mM solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002110,A 5% solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of glucose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002111,A volume of 100 mL of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002112,A 10 mM solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002113,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002114,The final pH was 7.4 after addition of lactic acid.,The final P H was 7 point 4 after addition of lactic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002115,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 before use.,The lactic acid solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002116,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002117,A 10 mg/mL solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002118,A 0.9% solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point nine percent solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002119,A 10 mg/mL solution of phosphate-buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of phosphate buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002120,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of ethanol.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of ethanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002121,A 1% solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002122,A 1 M solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002123,A 1% solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,A one percent solution of ammonium sulfate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002124,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002125,A volume of 0.1 mL of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the ammonium sulfate solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002126,A volume of 10 uL of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the sucrose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002127,A volume of 10 uL of the lactic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the lactic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002128,The glucose solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The glucose solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002129,A volume of 25 mL of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002130,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002131,The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.,The ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 4 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002132,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of mannitol.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of mannitol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002133,A 10 mg/mL solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002134,A volume of 10 uL of the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002135,A volume of 25 mL of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the sodium hydroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002136,A 1 M solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of sodium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002137,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 7.0 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 7 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002138,A 100 mM solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002139,A 10 mg/mL solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,A ten milligrams per millilitre solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002140,The final pH was 5.0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 5 point 0 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002141,A 1 M solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of mannitol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002142,A volume of 25 mL of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of twenty five millilitres of the acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002143,A 1 M solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002144,A volume of 100 mL of the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002145,A 10 mM solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002146,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The sodium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002147,A 0.5 M solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of magnesium chloride was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002148,A 0.5 M solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of potassium phosphate was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002149,The ethanol solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The ethanol solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002150,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 before use.,The acetic acid solution was adjusted to P H 9 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,acetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002151,A 0.5 M solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of methanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002152,A 10 mM solution of phosphate-buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,A ten millimolar solution of phosphate buffered saline was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002153,A 100 mM solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one hundred millimolar solution of citric acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002154,The hydrogen peroxide solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The hydrogen peroxide solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002155,A volume of 500 uL of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of five hundred microlitres of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002156,A 50 ug/mL solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002157,A volume of 10 mL of the glucose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the glucose solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002158,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of mannitol.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of mannitol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002159,The final pH was 6.5 after addition of glucose.,The final P H was 6 point 5 after addition of glucose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002160,A 0.5 M solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,A zero point five molar solution of lactose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002161,A volume of 0.1 mL of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of zero point one millilitre of the hydrogen peroxide solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002162,The reagent blank containing citric acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,The reagent blank containing citric acid remained within the expected acceptance range.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002163,A volume of 1 mL of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one millilitre of the Tris buffer solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,Tris buffer,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002164,The mannitol solution was adjusted to pH 8.5 before use.,The mannitol solution was adjusted to P H 8 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002165,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of potassium phosphate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002166,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of sodium hydroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sodium hydroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002167,A 1 M solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002168,The final pH was 7.0 after addition of lactose.,The final P H was 7 point 0 after addition of lactose.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,lactose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002169,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 before use.,The ammonium sulfate solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002170,A volume of 100 uL of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred microlitres of the mannitol solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,mannitol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002171,A volume of 10 mL of the magnesium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten millilitres of the magnesium chloride solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002172,The final pH was 5.5 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,The final P H was 5 point 5 after addition of hydrogen peroxide.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,hydrogen peroxide,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002173,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of methanol.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of methanol.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,methanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002174,The glucose solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 before use.,The glucose solution was adjusted to P H 4 point 5 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,glucose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002175,A 1 M solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A one molar solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002176,The final pH was 8.5 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,The final P H was 8 point 5 after addition of ammonium sulfate.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ammonium sulfate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002177,A 5% solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,A five percent solution of sucrose was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,sucrose,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002178,The final pH was 4.0 after addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.,The final P H was 4 point 0 after addition of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002179,A volume of 100 mL of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of one hundred millilitres of the citric acid solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,citric acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002180,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to pH 6.0 before use.,The potassium phosphate solution was adjusted to P H 6 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,potassium phosphate,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002181,The final pH was 9.0 after addition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.,The final P H was 9 point 0 after addition of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002182,A volume of 10 uL of the phosphate-buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,A volume of ten microlitres of the phosphate buffered saline solution was transferred into a sterile tube.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,phosphate-buffered saline,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002183,A 50 ug/mL solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,A fifty micrograms per millilitre solution of ethanol was prepared for the experiment.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,ethanol,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002184,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to pH 5.0 before use.,The magnesium chloride solution was adjusted to P H 5 point 0 before use.,chemistry,quantitative_chemistry,magnesium chloride,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002185,The control sample was included during membrane filtration to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during membrane filtration to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,membrane filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002186,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during autoclaving.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during autoclaving.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,autoclaving,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002187,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting vortex mixing.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting vortex mixing.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,vortex mixing,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002188,A documented procedure was followed for streak plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for streak plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,streak plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002189,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting phase-contrast microscopy.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting phase contrast microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002190,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting membrane filtration.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,membrane filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002191,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting centrifugation.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting centrifugation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,centrifugation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002192,The sample was processed by centrifugation before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by centrifugation before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,centrifugation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002193,A documented procedure was followed for spread plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for spread plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spread plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002194,The control sample was included during spectrophotometry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during spectrophotometry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spectrophotometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002195,A documented procedure was followed for phase-contrast microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for phase contrast microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002196,A documented procedure was followed for vortex mixing to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for vortex mixing to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,vortex mixing,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002197,The control sample was included during fluorescence microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during fluorescence microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002198,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting microscopy.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002199,The sample was processed by spectrophotometry before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by spectrophotometry before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spectrophotometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002200,The control sample was included during flow cytometry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during flow cytometry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,flow cytometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002201,The control sample was included during sonication to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during sonication to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sonication,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002202,The control sample was included during autoclaving to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during autoclaving to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,autoclaving,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002203,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during membrane filtration.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,membrane filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002204,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting fluorescence microscopy.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting fluorescence microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002205,A documented procedure was followed for fluorescence microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for fluorescence microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002206,The sample was processed by sterile filtration before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by sterile filtration before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sterile filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002207,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting streak plating.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting streak plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,streak plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002208,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during phase-contrast microscopy.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during phase contrast microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002209,A documented procedure was followed for sterile filtration to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for sterile filtration to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sterile filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002210,The sample was processed by homogenisation before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by homogenisation before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,homogenisation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002211,The sample was processed by vortex mixing before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by vortex mixing before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,vortex mixing,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002212,The control sample was included during aliquoting to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during aliquoting to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,aliquoting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002213,The sample was processed by fluorescence microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by fluorescence microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002214,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during microscopy.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002215,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during Gram staining.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during Gram staining.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002216,The sample was processed by flow cytometry before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by flow cytometry before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,flow cytometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002217,The sample was processed by Gram staining before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by Gram staining before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002218,The control sample was included during pour plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during pour plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,pour plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002219,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during aliquoting.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during aliquoting.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,aliquoting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002220,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during flow cytometry.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during flow cytometry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,flow cytometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002221,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting serial dilution.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting serial dilution.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,serial dilution,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002222,A documented procedure was followed for pour plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for pour plating to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,pour plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002223,The control sample was included during vortex mixing to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during vortex mixing to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,vortex mixing,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002224,The control sample was included during Gram staining to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during Gram staining to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002225,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting aliquoting.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting aliquoting.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,aliquoting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002226,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting sterile filtration.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting sterile filtration.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sterile filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002227,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting spread plating.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting spread plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spread plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002228,The sample was processed by autoclaving before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by autoclaving before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,autoclaving,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002229,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting pour plating.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting pour plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,pour plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002230,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting sonication.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting sonication.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sonication,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002231,The sample was processed by sonication before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by sonication before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sonication,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002232,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting incubation.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting incubation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,incubation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002233,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting turbidimetry.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting turbidimetry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,turbidimetry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002234,A documented procedure was followed for homogenisation to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for homogenisation to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,homogenisation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002235,A documented procedure was followed for spectrophotometry to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for spectrophotometry to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spectrophotometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002236,The sample was processed by serial dilution before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by serial dilution before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,serial dilution,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002237,A documented procedure was followed for flow cytometry to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for flow cytometry to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,flow cytometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002238,The control sample was included during turbidimetry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during turbidimetry to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,turbidimetry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002239,The control sample was included during homogenisation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during homogenisation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,homogenisation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002240,A documented procedure was followed for incubation to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for incubation to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,incubation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002241,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during serial dilution.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during serial dilution.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,serial dilution,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002242,The control sample was included during phase-contrast microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during phase contrast microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002243,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during turbidimetry.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during turbidimetry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,turbidimetry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002244,A documented procedure was followed for membrane filtration to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for membrane filtration to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,membrane filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002245,The sample was processed by spread plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by spread plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spread plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002246,The sample was processed by microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002247,A documented procedure was followed for serial dilution to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for serial dilution to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,serial dilution,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002248,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during sterile filtration.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during sterile filtration.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sterile filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002249,The sample was processed by membrane filtration before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by membrane filtration before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,membrane filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002250,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during homogenisation.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,homogenisation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002251,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during sonication.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during sonication.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sonication,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002252,The control sample was included during centrifugation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during centrifugation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,centrifugation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002253,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting flow cytometry.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting flow cytometry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,flow cytometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002254,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during spread plating.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during spread plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spread plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002255,The sample was processed by aliquoting before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by aliquoting before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,aliquoting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002256,The sample was processed by incubation before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by incubation before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,incubation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002257,A documented procedure was followed for autoclaving to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for autoclaving to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,autoclaving,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002258,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting autoclaving.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting autoclaving.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,autoclaving,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002259,The control sample was included during streak plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during streak plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,streak plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002260,The sample was processed by phase-contrast microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by phase contrast microscopy before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002261,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during pour plating.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during pour plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,pour plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002262,The sample was processed by turbidimetry before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by turbidimetry before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,turbidimetry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002263,A documented procedure was followed for turbidimetry to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for turbidimetry to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,turbidimetry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002264,A documented procedure was followed for aliquoting to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for aliquoting to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,aliquoting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002265,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting homogenisation.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,homogenisation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002266,The control sample was included during incubation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during incubation to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,incubation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002267,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during fluorescence microscopy.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during fluorescence microscopy.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002268,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during vortex mixing.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during vortex mixing.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,vortex mixing,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002269,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during streak plating.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during streak plating.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,streak plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002270,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during centrifugation.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during centrifugation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,centrifugation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002271,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting Gram staining.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting Gram staining.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002272,The control sample was included during sterile filtration to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during sterile filtration to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sterile filtration,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002273,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during incubation.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during incubation.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,incubation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002274,A documented procedure was followed for microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for microscopy to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002275,The sample was processed by streak plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by streak plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,streak plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002276,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during spectrophotometry.,The batch was repeated because a deviation occurred during spectrophotometry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spectrophotometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002277,A documented procedure was followed for sonication to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for sonication to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,sonication,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002278,The control sample was included during spread plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during spread plating to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spread plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002279,The control sample was included during microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during microscopy to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002280,A documented procedure was followed for Gram staining to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for Gram staining to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002281,The control sample was included during serial dilution to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,The control sample was included during serial dilution to confirm that the procedure remained valid.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,serial dilution,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002282,A documented procedure was followed for centrifugation to maintain consistency between analysts.,A documented procedure was followed for centrifugation to maintain consistency between analysts.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,centrifugation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002283,The sample was processed by pour plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,The sample was processed by pour plating before the analytical measurement was performed.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,pour plating,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002284,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting spectrophotometry.,The operator checked the equipment settings before starting spectrophotometry.,laboratory_methods,general_methods,spectrophotometry,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002285,The analytical balance was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The analytical balance was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,analytical balance,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002286,The incubator was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The incubator was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,incubator,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002287,The thermal cycler was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The thermal cycler was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,thermal cycler,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002288,The autoclave was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The autoclave was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,autoclave,easy,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002289,The water bath was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The water bath was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,water bath,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002290,A performance check was completed on the pipette before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the pipette before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pipette,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002291,A performance check was completed on the colony counter before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the colony counter before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,colony counter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002292,A performance check was completed on the incubator before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the incubator before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,incubator,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002293,The microplate reader was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The microplate reader was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microplate reader,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002294,The colony counter was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The colony counter was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,colony counter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002295,The analytical balance was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The analytical balance was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,analytical balance,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002296,The spectrophotometer was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The spectrophotometer was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,spectrophotometer,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002297,The biosafety cabinet was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The biosafety cabinet was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,biosafety cabinet,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002298,A performance check was completed on the biosafety cabinet before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the biosafety cabinet before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,biosafety cabinet,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002299,The microplate reader was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The microplate reader was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microplate reader,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002300,A performance check was completed on the pH meter before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the P H meter before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pH meter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002301,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the water bath in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the water bath in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,water bath,easy,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002302,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the colony counter in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the colony counter in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,colony counter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002303,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the analytical balance in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the analytical balance in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,analytical balance,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002304,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the incubator in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the incubator in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,incubator,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002305,A performance check was completed on the thermal cycler before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the thermal cycler before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,thermal cycler,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002306,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the spectrophotometer in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the spectrophotometer in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,spectrophotometer,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002307,The biosafety cabinet was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The biosafety cabinet was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,biosafety cabinet,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002308,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the centrifuge in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the centrifuge in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,centrifuge,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002309,A performance check was completed on the autoclave before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the autoclave before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,autoclave,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002310,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the pH meter in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the P H meter in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pH meter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002311,The centrifuge was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The centrifuge was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,centrifuge,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002312,The spectrophotometer was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The spectrophotometer was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,spectrophotometer,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002313,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the microscope in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the microscope in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microscope,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002314,A performance check was completed on the centrifuge before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the centrifuge before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,centrifuge,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002315,The microplate reader was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The microplate reader was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microplate reader,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002316,The incubator was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The incubator was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,incubator,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002317,The analytical balance was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The analytical balance was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,analytical balance,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002318,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the microplate reader in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the microplate reader in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microplate reader,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002319,The thermal cycler was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The thermal cycler was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,thermal cycler,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002320,The colony counter was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The colony counter was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,colony counter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002321,A performance check was completed on the microplate reader before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the microplate reader before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microplate reader,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002322,The colony counter was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The colony counter was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,colony counter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002323,The incubator was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The incubator was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,incubator,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002324,The water bath was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The water bath was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,water bath,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002325,The centrifuge was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The centrifuge was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,centrifuge,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002326,The microscope was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The microscope was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microscope,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002327,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the thermal cycler in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the thermal cycler in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,thermal cycler,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002328,A performance check was completed on the microscope before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the microscope before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microscope,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002329,A performance check was completed on the water bath before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the water bath before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,water bath,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002330,The pipette was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The pipette was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pipette,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002331,The pH meter was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The P H meter was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pH meter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002332,The pipette was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The pipette was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pipette,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002333,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the biosafety cabinet in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the biosafety cabinet in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,biosafety cabinet,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002334,A performance check was completed on the analytical balance before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the analytical balance before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,analytical balance,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002335,The pipette was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The pipette was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pipette,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002336,The thermal cycler was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The thermal cycler was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,thermal cycler,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002337,The pH meter was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The P H meter was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pH meter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002338,The microscope was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The microscope was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microscope,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002339,The pH meter was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The P H meter was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pH meter,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002340,The autoclave was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,The autoclave was cleaned after use according to the documented laboratory procedure.,laboratory_methods,equipment,autoclave,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002341,The autoclave was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The autoclave was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,autoclave,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002342,The centrifuge was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The centrifuge was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,centrifuge,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002343,A performance check was completed on the spectrophotometer before testing began.,A performance check was completed on the spectrophotometer before testing began.,laboratory_methods,equipment,spectrophotometer,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002344,The water bath was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The water bath was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,water bath,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002345,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the pipette in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the pipette in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,pipette,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002346,The spectrophotometer was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,The spectrophotometer was removed from service after the quality control check failed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,spectrophotometer,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002347,The microscope was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The microscope was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,microscope,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002348,The biosafety cabinet was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,The biosafety cabinet was checked before use and the calibration status was confirmed.,laboratory_methods,equipment,biosafety cabinet,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002349,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the autoclave in the laboratory record.,The analyst recorded the equipment identifier for the autoclave in the laboratory record.,laboratory_methods,equipment,autoclave,easy,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002350,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 18 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further eighteen hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002351,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002352,"After 36 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Yeasts and moulds.","After thirty six hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for yeasts and moulds.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002353,The incubation record showed 25 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed twenty five degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002354,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 24 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further twenty four hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002355,"After 36 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After thirty six hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002356,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002357,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002358,"After 18 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After eighteen hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002359,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002360,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002361,The incubation record showed 41 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed forty one degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002362,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002363,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002364,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002365,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002366,The PCA plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002367,The incubation record showed 42 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed forty two degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002368,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the MRS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002369,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 20 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further twenty hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002370,"After 22 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.","After twenty two hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002371,The incubation record showed 44 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed forty four degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002372,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002373,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 36 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further thirty six hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002374,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 22 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further twenty two hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002375,"After 36 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Yeasts and moulds.","After thirty six hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for yeasts and moulds.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002376,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the TBX agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002377,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002378,"After 48 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After forty eight hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002379,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 48 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further forty eight hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002380,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further 72 hours before final examination.,The culture was returned to the incubator for a further seventy two hours before final examination.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002381,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002382,"After 36 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After thirty six hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002383,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002384,"After 22 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After twenty two hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002385,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002386,"After 20 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After twenty hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002387,"After 48 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After forty eight hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002388,"After 20 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After twenty hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002389,The incubation record showed 30 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed thirty degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002390,"After 48 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.","After forty eight hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002391,"After 20 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After twenty hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002392,"After 20 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After twenty hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002393,The incubation record showed 37 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed thirty seven degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002394,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the MYP agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002395,"After 18 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After eighteen hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002396,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002397,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the mCCDA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002398,"After 20 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.","After twenty hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002399,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002400,"After 24 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After twenty four hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002401,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002402,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002403,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002404,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002405,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002406,"After 72 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After seventy two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002407,"After 48 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.","After forty eight hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002408,"After 20 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After twenty hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002409,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002410,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the ALOA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002411,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the TBX agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002412,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the TBX agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002413,The PCA plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002414,The ALOA plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002415,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002416,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002417,The incubation record showed 35 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed thirty five degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002418,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002419,The mCCDA plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002420,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002421,"After 20 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.","After twenty hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002422,The incubation record showed 22 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed twenty two degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002423,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002424,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002425,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002426,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002427,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002428,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the MYP agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002429,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the TBX agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002430,"After 18 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After eighteen hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002431,The incubation record showed 20 degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,The incubation record showed twenty degrees Celsius throughout the required holding period.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002432,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002433,"After 72 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After seventy two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002434,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002435,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002436,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002437,"After 18 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After eighteen hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002438,"After 18 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After eighteen hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002439,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the DRBC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002440,"After 22 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After twenty two hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002441,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002442,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002443,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002444,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002445,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002446,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002447,The PCA plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002448,"After 22 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After twenty two hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002449,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002450,"After 22 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After twenty two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002451,"After 18 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After eighteen hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002452,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002453,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002454,The mCCDA plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002455,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002456,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the XLD agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002457,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the ALOA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002458,The ALOA plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002459,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002460,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002461,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the ALOA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002462,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002463,"After 24 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After twenty four hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002464,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002465,"After 36 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.","After thirty six hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002466,The TSC agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002467,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002468,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002469,"After 36 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After thirty six hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002470,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002471,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002472,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002473,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002474,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002475,"After 72 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.","After seventy two hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterococcus faecalis.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002476,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002477,The PCA plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002478,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002479,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002480,"After 20 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.","After twenty hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002481,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the XLD agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002482,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002483,"After 48 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After forty eight hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002484,"After 48 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After forty eight hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002485,"After 20 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After twenty hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002486,"After 48 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.","After forty eight hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002487,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002488,"After 48 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After forty eight hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002489,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002490,The ALOA plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002491,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002492,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002493,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002494,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002495,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002496,The mCCDA plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002497,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the DRBC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002498,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002499,"After 48 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.","After forty eight hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002500,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002501,"After 36 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.","After thirty six hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002502,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002503,"After 72 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After seventy two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002504,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002505,"After 24 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After twenty four hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002506,"After 24 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After twenty four hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002507,"After 20 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After twenty hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002508,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002509,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002510,"After 18 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.","After eighteen hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002511,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002512,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002513,"After 72 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After seventy two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002514,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002515,The XLD agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002516,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the MRS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002517,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 35 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at thirty five degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002518,"After 18 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After eighteen hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002519,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the mCCDA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002520,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002521,"After 18 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After eighteen hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002522,"After 18 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After eighteen hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002523,"After 36 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After thirty six hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002524,"After 22 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After twenty two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002525,"After 24 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.","After twenty four hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio cholerae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002526,"After 22 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After twenty two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002527,"After 36 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After thirty six hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002528,The PCA plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002529,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002530,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002531,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002532,"After 36 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After thirty six hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002533,The TSC agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002534,"After 22 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After twenty two hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002535,"After 22 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After twenty two hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002536,"After 18 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After eighteen hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002537,"After 24 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After twenty four hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002538,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002539,"After 22 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After twenty two hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002540,"After 22 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After twenty two hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002541,"After 24 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After twenty four hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002542,"After 20 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After twenty hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002543,"After 48 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After forty eight hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002544,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the MRS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002545,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002546,"After 72 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After seventy two hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002547,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the mCCDA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002548,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the MRS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002549,"After 24 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.","After twenty four hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Listeria monocytogenes.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002550,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002551,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002552,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the MYP agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002553,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002554,"After 18 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After eighteen hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002555,"After 22 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Yeasts and moulds.","After twenty two hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for yeasts and moulds.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002556,The mCCDA plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002557,"After 18 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After eighteen hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002558,The PCA plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002559,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002560,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002561,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the ALOA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002562,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the TSC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002563,"After 48 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.","After forty eight hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002564,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002565,"After 72 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.","After seventy two hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002566,"After 72 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After seventy two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002567,The TBX agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002568,"After 18 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After eighteen hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002569,"After 24 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After twenty four hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002570,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the TSC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002571,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002572,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002573,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002574,"After 22 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After twenty two hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002575,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the Baird-Parker agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002576,The incubation temperature was verified at 20 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002577,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002578,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002579,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002580,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002581,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002582,The PCA plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002583,The incubation temperature was verified at 30 degrees Celsius before the CT-SMAC plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty degrees Celsius before the cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002584,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002585,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002586,"After 18 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After eighteen hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002587,"After 22 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After twenty two hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002588,"After 48 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After forty eight hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002589,"After 20 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.","After twenty hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002590,"After 36 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After thirty six hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002591,"After 22 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After twenty two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002592,"After 18 hours at 42 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After eighteen hours at forty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002593,"After 36 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.","After thirty six hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Salmonella enterica.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002594,The MYP agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002595,The incubation temperature was verified at 44 degrees Celsius before the ALOA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty four degrees Celsius before the agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002596,"After 36 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.","After thirty six hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Campylobacter jejuni.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002597,The TSC agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002598,The TSC agar plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002599,"After 22 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After twenty two hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002600,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the DRBC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002601,The TSC agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002602,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 72 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately seventy two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002603,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002604,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at twenty five degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002605,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio cholerae|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002606,The incubation temperature was verified at 35 degrees Celsius before the DRBC agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty five degrees Celsius before the dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002607,"After 72 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After seventy two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002608,The incubation temperature was verified at 42 degrees Celsius before the VRBGA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty two degrees Celsius before the violet red bile glucose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002609,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002610,"After 24 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Yeasts and moulds.","After twenty four hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for yeasts and moulds.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002611,"After 18 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After eighteen hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002612,The TCBS agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002613,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002614,"After 24 hours at 25 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.","After twenty four hours at twenty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002615,The incubation temperature was verified at 41 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at forty one degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002616,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the mCCDA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002617,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the XLD agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002618,"After 72 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After seventy two hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002619,The incubation temperature was verified at 25 degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty five degrees Celsius before the cetrimide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002620,The VRBGA plates were incubated at 30 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The violet red bile glucose agar plates were incubated at thirty degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002621,"After 72 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Aerobic colony count organisms.","After seventy two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for aerobic colony count organisms.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002622,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The cetrimide agar plates were incubated at thirty seven degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002623,"After 22 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After twenty two hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002624,"After 72 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After seventy two hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002625,"After 24 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After twenty four hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002626,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002627,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002628,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the TCBS agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002629,"After 72 hours at 22 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.","After seventy two hours at twenty two degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Bacillus cereus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002630,The ALOA plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 22 hours.,The agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty two hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Listeria monocytogenes|ALOA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002631,"After 20 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.","After twenty hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002632,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The Slanetz and Bartley agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterococcus faecalis|Slanetz and Bartley agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002633,"After 36 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","After thirty six hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cetrimide agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002634,"After 24 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.","After twenty four hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Staphylococcus aureus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002635,"After 72 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.","After seventy two hours at thirty seven degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Escherichia coli O157.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002636,The DRBC agar plates were incubated at 42 degrees Celsius for approximately 48 hours.,The dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar plates were incubated at forty two degrees Celsius for approximately forty eight hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Yeasts and moulds|DRBC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002637,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the TBX agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli|TBX agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002638,The mCCDA plates were incubated at 22 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were incubated at twenty two degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002639,"After 20 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.","After twenty hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|TCBS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002640,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the PCA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the plate count agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002641,The CT-SMAC plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 hours.,The cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately twenty hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Escherichia coli O157|CT-SMAC,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002642,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the mCCDA plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Campylobacter jejuni|mCCDA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002643,"After 72 hours at 41 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After seventy two hours at forty one degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002644,"After 20 hours at 35 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.","After twenty hours at thirty five degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Clostridium perfringens.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Clostridium perfringens|TSC agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002645,The MRS agar plates were incubated at 41 degrees Celsius for approximately 36 hours.,The de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar plates were incubated at forty one degrees Celsius for approximately thirty six hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002646,"After 22 hours at 44 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After twenty two hours at forty four degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002647,The incubation temperature was verified at 22 degrees Celsius before the MYP agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at twenty two degrees Celsius before the mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Bacillus cereus|MYP agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002648,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at 20 degrees Celsius for approximately 18 hours.,The Baird-Parker agar plates were incubated at twenty degrees Celsius for approximately eighteen hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Staphylococcus aureus|Baird-Parker agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002649,The PCA plates were incubated at 44 degrees Celsius for approximately 24 hours.,The plate count agar plates were incubated at forty four degrees Celsius for approximately twenty four hours.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Aerobic colony count organisms|PCA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002650,The incubation temperature was verified at 37 degrees Celsius before the XLD agar plates were loaded.,The incubation temperature was verified at thirty seven degrees Celsius before the xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates were loaded.,quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Salmonella enterica|XLD agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002651,"After 20 hours at 20 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Lactic acid bacteria.","After twenty hours at twenty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for lactic acid bacteria.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Lactic acid bacteria|MRS agar,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002652,"After 20 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.","After twenty hours at thirty degrees Celsius, the plates were examined for Enterobacteriaceae.",quantitative_science,temperature_and_time,Enterobacteriaceae|VRBGA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002653,The final preparation contained 10% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 10 point 0 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002654,A volume of 25 mL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of twenty five millilitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002655,The dilution factor was recorded before the final result was calculated.,The dilution factor was recorded before the final result was calculated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002656,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 1 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002657,A volume of 100 uL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of one hundred microlitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002658,The final preparation contained 2% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 2 point 0 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002659,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002660,The sample was centrifuged at 12000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 12000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002661,A one in ten dilution was prepared before the next serial dilution step.,A one in ten dilution was prepared before the next serial dilution step.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002662,The sample was centrifuged at 5000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 5000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002663,The final preparation contained 1% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 1 point 0 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002664,A volume of 50 uL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of fifty microlitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002665,The control sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002666,The control sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002667,The sample was centrifuged at 8000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 8000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002668,The environmental swab was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The environmental swab was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002669,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002670,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002671,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002672,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002673,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002674,A volume of 500 uL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of five hundred microlitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002675,The final preparation contained 0.1% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 0 point 1 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002676,The control sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002677,The water sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The water sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002678,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002679,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002680,The sample was centrifuged at 2000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 2000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002681,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002682,A volume of 10 mL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of ten millilitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002683,A volume of 100 mL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of one hundred millilitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002684,The sample was centrifuged at 3000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 3000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002685,The environmental swab was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The environmental swab was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002686,The water sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 1 mL was plated.,The water sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002687,A volume of 10 uL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of ten microlitres was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002688,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002689,The food sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002690,The sample was centrifuged at 1000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 1000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002691,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002692,The sample was centrifuged at 10000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,The sample was centrifuged at 10000 revolutions per minute before the supernatant was removed.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002693,The surface swab was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The surface swab was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002694,The final preparation contained 5% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 5 point 0 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002695,The final preparation contained 0.5% of the specified reagent by volume.,The final preparation contained 0 point 5 percent of the specified reagent by volume.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002696,The food sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002697,The control sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 1 mL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002698,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002699,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002700,The vegetable sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The vegetable sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002701,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002702,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002703,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002704,The food sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002705,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002706,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002707,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002708,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002709,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002710,A volume of 0.1 mL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of zero point one millilitre was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002711,The environmental swab was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The environmental swab was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002712,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002713,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002714,The control sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002715,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002716,The vegetable sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The vegetable sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002717,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002718,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002719,The surface swab was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The surface swab was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002720,The water sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The water sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002721,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002722,The control sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002723,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002724,A volume of 1 mL was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,A volume of one millilitre was transferred using a calibrated pipette.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002725,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002726,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002727,The control sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002728,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002729,The food sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002730,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002731,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002732,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002733,The environmental swab was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The environmental swab was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002734,The food sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002735,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002736,The vegetable sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The vegetable sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002737,The food sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The food sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002738,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002739,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002740,The vegetable sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The vegetable sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002741,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002742,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002743,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002744,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002745,The water sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The water sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002746,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002747,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002748,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-1 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus one before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002749,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002750,The raw material sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The raw material sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002751,The control sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The control sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002752,The culture suspension was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 100 uL was plated.,The culture suspension was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of one hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002753,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 1 mL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002754,The surface swab was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The surface swab was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002755,The soil sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 10 mL was plated.,The soil sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of ten millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002756,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-5 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus five before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002757,The milk sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The milk sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002758,The enrichment broth was diluted to 10^-4 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The enrichment broth was diluted to ten to the minus four before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002759,The surface swab was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 100 mL was plated.,The surface swab was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of one hundred millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002760,The meat sample was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 500 uL was plated.,The meat sample was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of five hundred microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002761,The finished product sample was diluted to 10^-6 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The finished product sample was diluted to ten to the minus six before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002762,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 25 mL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of twenty five millilitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002763,The vegetable sample was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The vegetable sample was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002764,The wastewater sample was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 0.1 mL was plated.,The wastewater sample was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of zero point one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002765,The buffer blank was diluted to 10^-7 before a volume of 1 mL was plated.,The buffer blank was diluted to ten to the minus seven before a volume of one millilitre was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002766,The surface swab was diluted to 10^-2 before a volume of 50 uL was plated.,The surface swab was diluted to ten to the minus two before a volume of fifty microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002767,The environmental swab was diluted to 10^-3 before a volume of 10 uL was plated.,The environmental swab was diluted to ten to the minus three before a volume of ten microlitres was plated.,quantitative_science,measurements_and_dilutions,dilution|measurement,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002768,A pure culture of Bacillus subtilis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Bacillus subtilis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002769,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 23 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty three millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002770,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Staphylococcus aureus was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Staphylococcus aureus was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002771,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002772,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured 14 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002773,A pure culture of Salmonella Typhimurium was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella Typhimurium was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002774,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured 24 millimetres for Staphylococcus epidermidis.,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured twenty four millimetres for Staphylococcus epidermidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002775,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 14 millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured fourteen millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002776,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Campylobacter jejuni was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Campylobacter jejuni was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002777,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Bacillus licheniformis was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Bacillus licheniformis was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002778,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002779,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Candida albicans to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Candida albicans to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002780,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002781,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 17 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured seventeen millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002782,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Bacillus subtilis was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Bacillus subtilis was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002783,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002784,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 18 millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured eighteen millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002785,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecium was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecium was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002786,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Enterobacteriaceae was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Enterobacteriaceae was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002787,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to chloramphenicol was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to chloramphenicol was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002788,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002789,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactic acid bacteria against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of lactic acid bacteria against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002790,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002791,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002792,A pure culture of Lactic acid bacteria was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of lactic acid bacteria was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002793,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against cefotaxime using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against cefotaxime using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002794,A pure culture of Bacillus cereus was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Bacillus cereus was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002795,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002796,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Vibrio cholerae was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Vibrio cholerae was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002797,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against ceftriaxone.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against ceftriaxone.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002798,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium sporogenes against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium sporogenes against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002799,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002800,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002801,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 34 millimetres for Clostridium sporogenes.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured thirty four millimetres for Clostridium sporogenes.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002802,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002803,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002804,A pure culture of Salmonella Enteritidis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella Enteritidis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002805,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella enterica was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella enterica was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002806,A pure culture of Penicillium chrysogenum was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Penicillium chrysogenum was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002807,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002808,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002809,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli O157 was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli O157 was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002810,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002811,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002812,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Citrobacter freundii was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Citrobacter freundii was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002813,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002814,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002815,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecium was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecium was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002816,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002817,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002818,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium sporogenes against cefotaxime.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium sporogenes against cefotaxime.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002819,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002820,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002821,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002822,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002823,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002824,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002825,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002826,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against meropenem.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against meropenem.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002827,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002828,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Lactic acid bacteria was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for lactic acid bacteria was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002829,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Aspergillus niger was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Aspergillus niger was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002830,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Lactobacillus plantarum was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Lactobacillus plantarum was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002831,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 19 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured nineteen millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002832,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002833,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002834,A pure culture of Listeria monocytogenes was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Listeria monocytogenes was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002835,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Enterobacteriaceae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Enterobacteriaceae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002836,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002837,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002838,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 35 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured thirty five millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002839,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002840,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 20 millimetres for Acinetobacter baumannii.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured twenty millimetres for Acinetobacter baumannii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002841,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002842,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to cefotaxime was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to cefotaxime was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002843,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002844,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 31 millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured thirty one millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002845,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002846,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Acinetobacter baumannii was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Acinetobacter baumannii was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002847,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002848,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Clostridium perfringens against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002849,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002850,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Listeria innocua was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Listeria innocua was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002851,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002852,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002853,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002854,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002855,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against ampicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against ampicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002856,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Escherichia coli was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Escherichia coli was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002857,The Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002858,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to cefotaxime was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to cefotaxime was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002859,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157 to gentamicin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157 to gentamicin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002860,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 31 millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured thirty one millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002861,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Staphylococcus aureus was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Staphylococcus aureus was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002862,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Proteus mirabilis was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Proteus mirabilis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002863,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002864,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002865,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against meropenem.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against meropenem.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002866,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 28 millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured twenty eight millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002867,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured 19 millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured nineteen millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002868,A pure culture of Campylobacter jejuni was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Campylobacter jejuni was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002869,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Staphylococcus epidermidis was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Staphylococcus epidermidis was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002870,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002871,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002872,The Aspergillus niger isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Aspergillus niger isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002873,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against meropenem.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against meropenem.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002874,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Serratia marcescens against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Serratia marcescens against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002875,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Lactococcus lactis was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Lactococcus lactis was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002876,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured 10 millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured ten millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002877,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 26 millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty six millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002878,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002879,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002880,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002881,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002882,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002883,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002884,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002885,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002886,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002887,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Klebsiella pneumoniae was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Klebsiella pneumoniae was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002888,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Salmonella Enteritidis was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Salmonella Enteritidis was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002889,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002890,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002891,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002892,The Bacillus subtilis isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus subtilis isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002893,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to trimethoprim was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to trimethoprim was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002894,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002895,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002896,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae against trimethoprim.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae against trimethoprim.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002897,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Citrobacter freundii against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Citrobacter freundii against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002898,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 22 millimetres for Clostridium sporogenes.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured twenty two millimetres for Clostridium sporogenes.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002899,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Citrobacter freundii was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Citrobacter freundii was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002900,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002901,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002902,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002903,A pure culture of Vibrio cholerae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Vibrio cholerae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002904,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002905,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured 22 millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured twenty two millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002906,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002907,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002908,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002909,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002910,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Clostridium sporogenes was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Clostridium sporogenes was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002911,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002912,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002913,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002914,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002915,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002916,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002917,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus licheniformis against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus licheniformis against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002918,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Citrobacter freundii was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Citrobacter freundii was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002919,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002920,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002921,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecium was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecium was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002922,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Penicillium chrysogenum against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Penicillium chrysogenum against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002923,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 30 millimetres for Candida albicans.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured thirty millimetres for Candida albicans.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002924,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactococcus lactis to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactococcus lactis to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002925,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to gentamicin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to gentamicin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002926,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 21 millimetres for Escherichia coli.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty one millimetres for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002927,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Klebsiella pneumoniae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Klebsiella pneumoniae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002928,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002929,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Staphylococcus aureus was difficult to measure.,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Staphylococcus aureus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002930,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured 25 millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured twenty five millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002931,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Clostridium sporogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Clostridium sporogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002932,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002933,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002934,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002935,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Bacillus licheniformis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Bacillus licheniformis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002936,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002937,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_002938,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002939,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002940,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Escherichia coli O157 was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Escherichia coli O157 was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002941,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002942,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against trimethoprim.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against trimethoprim.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002943,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002944,A pure culture of Clostridium sporogenes was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Clostridium sporogenes was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002945,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002946,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Listeria innocua was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Listeria innocua was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002947,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 27 millimetres for Clostridium perfringens.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured twenty seven millimetres for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002948,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to amoxicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to amoxicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002949,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002950,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002951,A pure culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002952,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured 18 millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured eighteen millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002953,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to ampicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to ampicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002954,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Proteus mirabilis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Proteus mirabilis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002955,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 26 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty six millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002956,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002957,A pure culture of Bacillus subtilis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Bacillus subtilis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002958,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against chloramphenicol.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against chloramphenicol.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002959,A pure culture of Penicillium chrysogenum was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Penicillium chrysogenum was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002960,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002961,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against cefotaxime.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against cefotaxime.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002962,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Escherichia coli O157 was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Escherichia coli O157 was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002963,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Salmonella enterica was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Salmonella enterica was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002964,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002965,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002966,A pure culture of Lactic acid bacteria was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of lactic acid bacteria was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002967,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002968,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Proteus mirabilis against trimethoprim.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Proteus mirabilis against trimethoprim.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002969,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 27 millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty seven millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002970,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against cefotaxime.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against cefotaxime.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002971,The Lactococcus lactis isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Lactococcus lactis isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002972,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002973,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002974,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002975,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002976,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to ampicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002977,A pure culture of Campylobacter jejuni was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Campylobacter jejuni was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002978,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002979,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 13 millimetres for Lactic acid bacteria.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured thirteen millimetres for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002980,A pure culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002981,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002982,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002983,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against chloramphenicol.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against chloramphenicol.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002984,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 20 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured twenty millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002985,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002986,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Typhimurium was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Typhimurium was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002987,The Bacillus subtilis isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus subtilis isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002988,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002989,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002990,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 17 millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured seventeen millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002991,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002992,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 14 millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002993,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 22 millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty two millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002994,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 18 millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured eighteen millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_002995,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002996,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria innocua against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria innocua against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002997,The Proteus mirabilis isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Proteus mirabilis isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002998,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to amoxicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to amoxicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_002999,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus licheniformis against cefotaxime.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus licheniformis against cefotaxime.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003000,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003001,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003002,The Lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003003,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003004,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003005,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Campylobacter jejuni was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Campylobacter jejuni was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003006,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Clostridium sporogenes was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Clostridium sporogenes was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003007,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003008,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003009,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Lactic acid bacteria was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for lactic acid bacteria was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003010,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003011,A pure culture of Klebsiella pneumoniae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Klebsiella pneumoniae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003012,A pure culture of Listeria innocua was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Listeria innocua was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003013,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003014,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003015,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Staphylococcus epidermidis was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Staphylococcus epidermidis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003016,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to amoxicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to amoxicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003017,A pure culture of Bacillus licheniformis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Bacillus licheniformis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003018,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003019,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003020,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003021,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003022,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003023,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003024,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003025,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003026,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003027,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003028,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003029,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003030,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactococcus lactis against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactococcus lactis against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003031,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003032,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 28 millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured twenty eight millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003033,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003034,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003035,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Salmonella Enteritidis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Salmonella Enteritidis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003036,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactic acid bacteria to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria to tetracycline was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003037,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecalis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003038,The Enterococcus faecalis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterococcus faecalis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003039,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Salmonella Typhimurium was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Salmonella Typhimurium was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003040,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to vancomycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to vancomycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003041,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003042,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003043,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003044,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003045,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003046,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 11 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured eleven millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003047,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria innocua against chloramphenicol.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria innocua against chloramphenicol.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003048,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Serratia marcescens was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Serratia marcescens was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003049,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured 29 millimetres for Clostridium perfringens.,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured twenty nine millimetres for Clostridium perfringens.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003050,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio cholerae was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio cholerae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003051,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 29 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured twenty nine millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003052,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to ceftriaxone was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to ceftriaxone was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003053,A pure culture of Candida albicans was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Candida albicans was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003054,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Aspergillus niger was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Aspergillus niger was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003055,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against ciprofloxacin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against ciprofloxacin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003056,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003057,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Listeria innocua was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Listeria innocua was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003058,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger against ceftriaxone.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger against ceftriaxone.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003059,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003060,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003061,The erythromycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The erythromycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003062,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 14 millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003063,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003064,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003065,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003066,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003067,A pure culture of Klebsiella pneumoniae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Klebsiella pneumoniae was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003068,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 17 millimetres for Enterococcus faecalis.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured seventeen millimetres for Enterococcus faecalis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003069,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003070,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003071,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003072,The Enterococcus faecium isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterococcus faecium isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003073,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Salmonella Typhimurium was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Salmonella Typhimurium was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003074,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecalis was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecalis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003075,The Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003076,The Listeria innocua isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria innocua isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003077,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003078,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003079,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Acinetobacter baumannii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Acinetobacter baumannii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003080,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 22 millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured twenty two millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003081,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Lactococcus lactis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Lactococcus lactis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003082,The Proteus mirabilis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Proteus mirabilis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003083,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003084,The Salmonella enterica isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Salmonella enterica isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003085,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 18 millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured eighteen millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003086,A pure culture of Salmonella Enteritidis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella Enteritidis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003087,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 23 millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured twenty three millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003088,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Enterococcus faecalis was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Enterococcus faecalis was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003089,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003090,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 31 millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured thirty one millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003091,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecium was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecium was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003092,A pure culture of Aspergillus niger was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Aspergillus niger was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003093,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003094,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003095,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003096,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003097,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 30 millimetres for Escherichia coli.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured thirty millimetres for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003098,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003099,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003100,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003101,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003102,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactic acid bacteria to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003103,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003104,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003105,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003106,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 12 millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured twelve millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003107,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003108,A pure culture of Salmonella enterica was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella enterica was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003109,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactococcus lactis against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactococcus lactis against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003110,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella enterica was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003111,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Lactic acid bacteria was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for lactic acid bacteria was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003112,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003113,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003114,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003115,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003116,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 24 millimetres for Bacillus subtilis.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty four millimetres for Bacillus subtilis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003117,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003118,A pure culture of Aspergillus niger was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Aspergillus niger was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003119,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003120,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003121,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Penicillium chrysogenum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003122,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003123,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003124,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003125,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacteriaceae was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacteriaceae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003126,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003127,The Listeria innocua isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria innocua isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003128,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus cereus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003129,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 33 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured thirty three millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003130,A pure culture of Candida albicans was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Candida albicans was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003131,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003132,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003133,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003134,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Serratia marcescens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003135,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 21 millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured twenty one millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003136,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003137,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003138,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003139,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003140,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003141,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against ampicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecalis against ampicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003142,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003143,The Salmonella Enteritidis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Salmonella Enteritidis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003144,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterobacteriaceae was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterobacteriaceae was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003145,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 15 millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured fifteen millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003146,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003147,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003148,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Lactic acid bacteria was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for lactic acid bacteria was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003149,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003150,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to vancomycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to vancomycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003151,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Campylobacter jejuni was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Campylobacter jejuni was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003152,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003153,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Listeria monocytogenes was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Listeria monocytogenes was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003154,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003155,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 27 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured twenty seven millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003156,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 20 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003157,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003158,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecium was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Enterococcus faecium was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003159,A pure culture of Bacillus licheniformis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Bacillus licheniformis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003160,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Bacillus cereus was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Bacillus cereus was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003161,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003162,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 15 millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured fifteen millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003163,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterococcus faecalis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterococcus faecalis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003164,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003165,The Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate was tested against erythromycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003166,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003167,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 35 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured thirty five millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003168,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 11 millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured eleven millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003169,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to tetracycline was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003170,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 14 millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003171,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 35 millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured thirty five millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003172,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 35 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured thirty five millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003173,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003174,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against ampicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against ampicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003175,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003176,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Salmonella Enteritidis was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Salmonella Enteritidis was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003177,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 18 millimetres for Escherichia coli O157.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured eighteen millimetres for Escherichia coli O157.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003178,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003179,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003180,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Serratia marcescens against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Serratia marcescens against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003181,The Clostridium perfringens isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium perfringens isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003182,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003183,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus licheniformis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003184,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 16 millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured sixteen millimetres for Vibrio cholerae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003185,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003186,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003187,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Clostridium perfringens was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Clostridium perfringens was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003188,A pure culture of Vibrio cholerae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Vibrio cholerae was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003189,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium against tetracycline.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium against tetracycline.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003190,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003191,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria monocytogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003192,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Clostridium sporogenes was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Clostridium sporogenes was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003193,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 10 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured ten millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003194,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Lactobacillus plantarum was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003195,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was difficult to measure.,The ceftriaxone result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003196,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 16 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured sixteen millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003197,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against meropenem.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii against meropenem.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003198,A pure culture of Salmonella enterica was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella enterica was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003199,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against trimethoprim.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against trimethoprim.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003200,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003201,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003202,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003203,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against cefotaxime using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against cefotaxime using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003204,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003205,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003206,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003207,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003208,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003209,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003210,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus epidermidis against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus epidermidis against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003211,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003212,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 19 millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured nineteen millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003213,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against ceftriaxone.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against ceftriaxone.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003214,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Citrobacter freundii was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Citrobacter freundii was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003215,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 13 millimetres for Klebsiella pneumoniae.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured thirteen millimetres for Klebsiella pneumoniae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003216,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 29 millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured twenty nine millimetres for Enterococcus faecium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003217,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 26 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured twenty six millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003218,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003219,The Bacillus licheniformis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus licheniformis isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003220,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterobacteriaceae was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterobacteriaceae was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003221,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Penicillium chrysogenum was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Penicillium chrysogenum was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003222,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 18 millimetres for Escherichia coli.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured eighteen millimetres for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003223,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003224,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003225,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Clostridium sporogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the meropenem susceptibility result for Clostridium sporogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003226,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Lactococcus lactis was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Lactococcus lactis was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003227,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium perfringens was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium perfringens was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003228,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Staphylococcus aureus was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Staphylococcus aureus was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003229,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003230,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 27 millimetres for Acinetobacter baumannii.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured twenty seven millimetres for Acinetobacter baumannii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003231,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003232,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003233,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured 23 millimetres for Listeria innocua.,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured twenty three millimetres for Listeria innocua.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003234,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Penicillium chrysogenum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003235,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Klebsiella pneumoniae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Klebsiella pneumoniae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003236,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Clostridium sporogenes was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Clostridium sporogenes was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003237,The Enterococcus faecalis isolate was tested against ciprofloxacin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterococcus faecalis isolate was tested against ciprofloxacin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003238,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003239,A pure culture of Proteus mirabilis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Proteus mirabilis was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003240,The Lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003241,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,The ampicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003242,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003243,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Citrobacter freundii was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Citrobacter freundii was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003244,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003245,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Citrobacter freundii was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Citrobacter freundii was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003246,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003247,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured 12 millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured twelve millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003248,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus epidermidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003249,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Aspergillus niger was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003250,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to gentamicin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003251,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003252,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to chloramphenicol was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to chloramphenicol was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003253,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Clostridium perfringens was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003254,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli O157 against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003255,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Aspergillus niger was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefotaxime for Aspergillus niger was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003256,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003257,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Bacillus cereus was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Bacillus cereus was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003258,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Acinetobacter baumannii was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003259,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to ciprofloxacin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003260,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 16 millimetres for Lactic acid bacteria.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured sixteen millimetres for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003261,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003262,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of gentamicin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003263,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the chloramphenicol susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003264,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactic acid bacteria against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of lactic acid bacteria against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003265,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured 17 millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured seventeen millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003266,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacter cloacae against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003267,The Clostridium perfringens isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium perfringens isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003268,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003269,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Lactobacillus plantarum was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003270,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003271,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterococcus faecium was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Enterococcus faecium was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003272,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Lactococcus lactis was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003273,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003274,A pure culture of Enterobacteriaceae was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Enterobacteriaceae was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003275,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli O157 was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003276,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacteriaceae isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003277,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterobacter cloacae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003278,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Lactococcus lactis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Lactococcus lactis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003279,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to trimethoprim was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003280,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 11 millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured eleven millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003281,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003282,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003283,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured 18 millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,The inhibition zone around the vancomycin disk measured eighteen millimetres for Lactococcus lactis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003284,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 30 millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured thirty millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003285,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Salmonella Typhimurium was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003286,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against trimethoprim using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003287,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003288,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Lactic acid bacteria against trimethoprim.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of lactic acid bacteria against trimethoprim.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003289,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured 21 millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,The inhibition zone around the ceftriaxone disk measured twenty one millimetres for Citrobacter freundii.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003290,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,The trimethoprim result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003291,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against gentamicin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against gentamicin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003292,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the amoxicillin susceptibility result for Salmonella Enteritidis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003293,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Enterobacter cloacae was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003294,The Escherichia coli isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Escherichia coli isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003295,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterobacter cloacae was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Enterobacter cloacae was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003296,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to ampicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to ampicillin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003297,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Proteus mirabilis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Proteus mirabilis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003298,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Acinetobacter baumannii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Acinetobacter baumannii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003299,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Citrobacter freundii isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003300,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 21 millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured twenty one millimetres for Salmonella Enteritidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003301,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003302,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 15 millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured fifteen millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003303,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 18 millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured eighteen millimetres for Bacillus licheniformis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003304,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003305,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Salmonella Typhimurium isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003306,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Enterococcus faecalis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003307,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003308,A pure culture of Citrobacter freundii was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Citrobacter freundii was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003309,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 10 millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured ten millimetres for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003310,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003311,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003312,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003313,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Proteus mirabilis against ceftriaxone.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Proteus mirabilis against ceftriaxone.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003314,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Citrobacter freundii was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Citrobacter freundii was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003315,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 14 millimetres for Bacillus subtilis.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Bacillus subtilis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003316,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Clostridium sporogenes was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Clostridium sporogenes was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003317,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003318,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003319,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003320,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Clostridium perfringens was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin for Clostridium perfringens was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003321,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Citrobacter freundii was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Citrobacter freundii was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003322,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003323,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003324,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003325,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003326,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum to cefotaxime was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003327,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 33 millimetres for Staphylococcus epidermidis.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured thirty three millimetres for Staphylococcus epidermidis.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003328,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003329,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 14 millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured fourteen millimetres for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003330,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria innocua to erythromycin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003331,The Bacillus licheniformis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus licheniformis isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003332,The Bacillus cereus isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus cereus isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003333,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003334,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Listeria monocytogenes was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003335,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003336,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003337,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,A pure culture of Escherichia coli was prepared before minimum inhibitory concentration testing was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003338,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 15 millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured fifteen millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003339,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003340,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Candida albicans to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Candida albicans to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003341,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,The chloramphenicol result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactococcus lactis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003342,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 19 millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured nineteen millimetres for Penicillium chrysogenum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003343,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli O157 was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli O157 was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003344,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate was tested against chloramphenicol using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003345,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to meropenem was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003346,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Penicillium chrysogenum to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Penicillium chrysogenum to chloramphenicol was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003347,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Campylobacter jejuni was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Campylobacter jejuni was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003348,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003349,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Clostridium sporogenes was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Clostridium sporogenes was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003350,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003351,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria innocua was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Listeria innocua was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003352,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003353,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli O157 was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli O157 was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003354,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against meropenem.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against meropenem.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003355,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the tetracycline susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003356,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003357,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003358,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactobacillus plantarum was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003359,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003360,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus epidermidis against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus epidermidis against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003361,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio cholerae was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio cholerae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003362,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecium was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Enterococcus faecium was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003363,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 23 millimetres for Candida albicans.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty three millimetres for Candida albicans.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003364,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Candida albicans was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Candida albicans was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003365,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured 15 millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,The inhibition zone around the cefotaxime disk measured fifteen millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003366,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to erythromycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003367,The Escherichia coli O157 isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Escherichia coli O157 isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003368,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003369,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Lactobacillus plantarum was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Lactobacillus plantarum was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003370,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003371,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Candida albicans was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Candida albicans was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003372,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against vancomycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni against vancomycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003373,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003374,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Lactobacillus plantarum was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Lactobacillus plantarum was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003375,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Enterobacteriaceae was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Enterobacteriaceae was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003376,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Staphylococcus epidermidis was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003377,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Escherichia coli O157 was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Escherichia coli O157 was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003378,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003379,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Bacillus cereus was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Bacillus cereus was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003380,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 25 millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured twenty five millimetres for Enterobacter cloacae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003381,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for Lactic acid bacteria was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for lactic acid bacteria was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|vancomycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003382,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003383,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Aspergillus niger was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003384,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactococcus lactis to trimethoprim was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactococcus lactis to trimethoprim was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|trimethoprim|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003385,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against ceftriaxone.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against ceftriaxone.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003386,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 35 millimetres for Lactic acid bacteria.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured thirty five millimetres for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003387,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Campylobacter jejuni isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Campylobacter jejuni|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003388,The Escherichia coli O157 isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Escherichia coli O157 isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003389,A pure culture of Listeria monocytogenes was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Listeria monocytogenes was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003390,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,The cefotaxime result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Clostridium sporogenes was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003391,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003392,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against tetracycline using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003393,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,The vancomycin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003394,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Lactobacillus plantarum isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003395,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhimurium to vancomycin was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003396,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 33 millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured thirty three millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003397,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 21 millimetres for Klebsiella pneumoniae.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty one millimetres for Klebsiella pneumoniae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003398,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Bacillus cereus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Bacillus cereus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003399,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against vancomycin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003400,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Listeria innocua was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003401,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus subtilis to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus subtilis to ciprofloxacin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003402,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Proteus mirabilis was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Proteus mirabilis was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003403,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterobacter cloacae isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacter cloacae|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003404,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against chloramphenicol.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus against chloramphenicol.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003405,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Staphylococcus aureus was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of erythromycin for Staphylococcus aureus was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003406,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to ceftriaxone was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to ceftriaxone was assessed by minimum inhibitory concentration testing.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003407,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 18 millimetres for Listeria innocua.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured eighteen millimetres for Listeria innocua.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria innocua|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003408,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Bacillus cereus was 1 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Bacillus cereus was 1 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003409,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Acinetobacter baumannii was 0.25 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Acinetobacter baumannii was 0 point 25 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003410,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 24 millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured twenty four millimetres for Serratia marcescens.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003411,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Bacillus subtilis was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Bacillus subtilis was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003412,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the cefotaxime susceptibility result for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|cefotaxime|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003413,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 28 millimetres for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured twenty eight millimetres for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003414,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against cefotaxime.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Listeria monocytogenes against cefotaxime.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003415,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Penicillium chrysogenum against erythromycin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Penicillium chrysogenum against erythromycin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|erythromycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003416,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,The ciprofloxacin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Candida albicans was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003417,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Clostridium perfringens was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium perfringens|vancomycin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003418,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against amoxicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Vibrio cholerae against amoxicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003419,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus subtilis against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Bacillus subtilis against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003420,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003421,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Saccharomyces cerevisiae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003422,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 14 millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured fourteen millimetres for Salmonella Typhimurium.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003423,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ceftriaxone|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003424,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Bacillus cereus was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of trimethoprim for Bacillus cereus was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|trimethoprim|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003425,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured 26 millimetres for Escherichia coli.,The inhibition zone around the chloramphenicol disk measured twenty six millimetres for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003426,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured 30 millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,The inhibition zone around the erythromycin disk measured thirty millimetres for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterobacteriaceae|erythromycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003427,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the vancomycin susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|vancomycin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003428,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Candida albicans isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003429,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to amoxicillin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003430,The Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003431,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus cereus to gentamicin was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003432,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Citrobacter freundii to ampicillin was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003433,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus licheniformis to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus licheniformis|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003434,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to meropenem was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003435,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 32 millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured thirty two millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003436,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 10 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured ten millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003437,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Citrobacter freundii was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003438,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured 33 millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,The inhibition zone around the gentamicin disk measured thirty three millimetres for Salmonella enterica.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003439,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003440,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Enterococcus faecalis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003441,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 34 millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured thirty four millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003442,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ampicillin susceptibility result for Candida albicans was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003443,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured 29 millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,The inhibition zone around the meropenem disk measured twenty nine millimetres for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003444,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to cefotaxime was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium sporogenes to cefotaxime was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|cefotaxime|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003445,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumoniae was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003446,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for Lactic acid bacteria was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the trimethoprim susceptibility result for lactic acid bacteria was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003447,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Candida albicans was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Candida albicans was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003448,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Salmonella enterica was 0.5 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of meropenem for Salmonella enterica was 0 point 5 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003449,The Lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The lactic acid bacteria isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003450,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis against ampicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis against ampicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003451,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli O157 was difficult to measure.,The amoxicillin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Escherichia coli O157 was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003452,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to tetracycline was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli to tetracycline was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003453,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003454,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured 33 millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,The inhibition zone around the tetracycline disk measured thirty three millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|tetracycline|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003455,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Vibrio cholerae isolate was tested against ceftriaxone using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio cholerae|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003456,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured 29 millimetres for Aspergillus niger.,The inhibition zone around the ampicillin disk measured twenty nine millimetres for Aspergillus niger.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003457,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the gentamicin susceptibility result for Bacillus subtilis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003458,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Klebsiella pneumoniae was 32 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of tetracycline for Klebsiella pneumoniae was 32 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Klebsiella pneumoniae|tetracycline|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003459,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 12 millimetres for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured twelve millimetres for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Saccharomyces cerevisiae|amoxicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003460,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Proteus mirabilis was 2 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Proteus mirabilis was 2 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Proteus mirabilis|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003461,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Staphylococcus aureus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003462,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against ampicillin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Candida albicans against ampicillin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Candida albicans|ampicillin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003463,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157 to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157 to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003464,The Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus epidermidis|ampicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003465,The Bacillus cereus isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Bacillus cereus isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003466,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Listeria monocytogenes isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|gentamicin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003467,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured 17 millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,The inhibition zone around the trimethoprim disk measured seventeen millimetres for Lactobacillus plantarum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactobacillus plantarum|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003468,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|meropenem|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003469,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the erythromycin susceptibility result for Escherichia coli O157 was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli O157|erythromycin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003470,A pure culture of Salmonella Typhimurium was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,A pure culture of Salmonella Typhimurium was prepared before broth microdilution was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Typhimurium|amoxicillin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003471,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against chloramphenicol.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus against chloramphenicol.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|chloramphenicol|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003472,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,A pure culture of Serratia marcescens was prepared before disk diffusion was started.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003473,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella enterica|ciprofloxacin|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003474,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aspergillus niger to trimethoprim was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Aspergillus niger|trimethoprim|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003475,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Enterococcus faecalis was 4 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone for Enterococcus faecalis was 4 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecalis|ceftriaxone|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003476,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus subtilis was difficult to measure.,The meropenem result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Bacillus subtilis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus subtilis|meropenem|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003477,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Bacillus cereus was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ciprofloxacin susceptibility result for Bacillus cereus was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Bacillus cereus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003478,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was tested against gentamicin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Staphylococcus aureus|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003479,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for lactic acid bacteria was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactic acid bacteria|gentamicin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003480,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,Quality control results were reviewed before the ceftriaxone susceptibility result for Lactococcus lactis was reported.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Lactococcus lactis|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003481,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Escherichia coli was 16 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol for Escherichia coli was 16 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Escherichia coli|chloramphenicol|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003482,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 milligrams per litre.,The minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 8 milligrams per litre.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003483,The Penicillium chrysogenum isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Penicillium chrysogenum isolate was tested against meropenem using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Penicillium chrysogenum|meropenem|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003484,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured 20 millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,The inhibition zone around the ciprofloxacin disk measured twenty millimetres for Vibrio parahaemolyticus.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Vibrio parahaemolyticus|ciprofloxacin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003485,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured 26 millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,The inhibition zone around the amoxicillin disk measured twenty six millimetres for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Pseudomonas aeruginosa|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003486,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Serratia marcescens to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Serratia marcescens to chloramphenicol was assessed by broth microdilution.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Serratia marcescens|chloramphenicol|broth microdilution,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003487,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Citrobacter freundii against ciprofloxacin.,The inoculum density was standardised before susceptibility testing of Citrobacter freundii against ciprofloxacin.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Citrobacter freundii|ciprofloxacin|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003488,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Clostridium sporogenes isolate was tested against amoxicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Clostridium sporogenes|amoxicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003489,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to ceftriaxone was assessed by disk diffusion.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Listeria monocytogenes|ceftriaxone|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003490,The Enterococcus faecium isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,The Enterococcus faecium isolate was tested against ampicillin using a freshly prepared inoculum.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Enterococcus faecium|ampicillin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003491,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Acinetobacter baumannii was difficult to measure.,The gentamicin result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Acinetobacter baumannii was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Acinetobacter baumannii|gentamicin|disk diffusion,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003492,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,The tetracycline result was repeated because the first inhibition zone for Salmonella Enteritidis was difficult to measure.,microbiology,antimicrobial_susceptibility,Salmonella Enteritidis|tetracycline|minimum inhibitory concentration testing,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003493,The limit of detection was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The limit of detection was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003494,The selectivity assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The selectivity assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003495,The limit of quantification was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The limit of quantification was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003496,A total of 3 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of three replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003497,The precision study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The precision study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003498,The external quality assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The external quality assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003499,"Documentation for the reference material included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the reference material included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003500,The selectivity assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The selectivity assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003501,The internal quality control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The internal quality control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003502,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003503,The sterility control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The sterility control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003504,The sterility control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The sterility control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003505,The internal quality control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The internal quality control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003506,A total of 10 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of ten replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003507,The proficiency test was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The proficiency test was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003508,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the milk sample were authorised.,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the milk sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003509,The limit of quantification was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The limit of quantification was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003510,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003511,The blank control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The blank control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003512,The negative control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The negative control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003513,Results from the proficiency test were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the proficiency test were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003514,The method validation was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The method validation was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003515,The reference material was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The reference material was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003516,Results from the recovery study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the recovery study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003517,The precision study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The precision study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003518,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated repeatability study failed.,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated repeatability study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003519,The recovery study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The recovery study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003520,The repeatability study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The repeatability study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003521,The reproducibility study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The reproducibility study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003522,Results from the reproducibility study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the reproducibility study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003523,The negative control was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003524,The specificity assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The specificity assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003525,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003526,A total of 11 replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,A total of eleven replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003527,The repeatability study was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The repeatability study was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003528,The precision study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The precision study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003529,"Documentation for the negative control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the negative control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003530,The method validation result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The method validation result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003531,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003532,A total of 2 replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,A total of two replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003533,A total of 15 replicate measurements were included in the negative control.,A total of fifteen replicate measurements were included in the negative control.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003534,"Documentation for the reproducibility study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the reproducibility study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003535,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003536,The limit of detection result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The limit of detection result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003537,A total of 18 replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,A total of eighteen replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003538,Results from the negative control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the negative control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003539,The limit of quantification demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The limit of quantification demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003540,The method validation demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The method validation demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003541,The reference material result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The reference material result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003542,"Documentation for the specificity assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the specificity assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003543,"Documentation for the precision study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the precision study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003544,The method verification was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003545,A total of 5 replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,A total of five replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003546,"Documentation for the recovery study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the recovery study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003547,Results from the limit of detection were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the limit of detection were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003548,Results from the repeatability study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the repeatability study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003549,"Documentation for the repeatability study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the repeatability study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003550,"Documentation for the sterility control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the sterility control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003551,The blank control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The blank control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003552,The proficiency test was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The proficiency test was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003553,Results from the internal quality control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the internal quality control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003554,The internal quality control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The internal quality control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003555,The method verification was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003556,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003557,"Documentation for the method verification included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the method verification included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003558,The method validation was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The method validation was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003559,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003560,The repeatability study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The repeatability study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003561,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003562,The external quality assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The external quality assessment demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003563,The control sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reproducibility study failed.,The control sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reproducibility study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003564,Results from the method verification were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the method verification were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003565,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003566,Results from the positive control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the positive control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003567,The negative control was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003568,A total of 7 replicate measurements were included in the reference material.,A total of seven replicate measurements were included in the reference material.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003569,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003570,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003571,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003572,"Documentation for the measurement uncertainty included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the measurement uncertainty included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003573,Results from the sterility control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the sterility control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003574,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003575,"Documentation for the positive control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the positive control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003576,The positive control was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,The positive control was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003577,The repeatability study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The repeatability study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003578,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003579,A total of 4 replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,A total of four replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003580,The sterility control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The sterility control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003581,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003582,Results from the limit of quantification were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the limit of quantification were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003583,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003584,The specificity assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The specificity assessment result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003585,"Documentation for the limit of detection included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the limit of detection included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003586,The reproducibility study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The reproducibility study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003587,"Documentation for the robustness study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the robustness study included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003588,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003589,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003590,A total of 6 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of six replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003591,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003592,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003593,A total of 14 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of fourteen replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003594,The positive control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The positive control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003595,The positive control was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,The positive control was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003596,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003597,The recovery study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The recovery study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003598,The positive control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The positive control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003599,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,The surface swab was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003600,"Documentation for the internal quality control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the internal quality control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003601,The specificity assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The specificity assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003602,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003603,The selectivity assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The selectivity assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003604,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003605,A total of 5 replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,A total of five replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003606,A total of 20 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of twenty replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003607,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003608,The method validation was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,The method validation was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003609,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003610,A total of 14 replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,A total of fourteen replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003611,The limit of detection demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The limit of detection demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003612,The measurement uncertainty was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The measurement uncertainty was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003613,The repeatability study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The repeatability study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003614,The reproducibility study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The reproducibility study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003615,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003616,The external quality assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The external quality assessment was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003617,Results from the selectivity assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the selectivity assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003618,Results from the reference material were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the reference material were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003619,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003620,The positive control was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,The positive control was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003621,A total of 5 replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,A total of five replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003622,The reference material was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The reference material was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003623,The measurement uncertainty result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The measurement uncertainty result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003624,A total of 14 replicate measurements were included in the limit of quantification.,A total of fourteen replicate measurements were included in the limit of quantification.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003625,"Documentation for the external quality assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the external quality assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003626,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated blank control failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated blank control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003627,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003628,The robustness study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The robustness study result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003629,The method validation was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,The method validation was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003630,"Documentation for the limit of quantification included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the limit of quantification included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003631,The negative control was reviewed before results from the wastewater sample were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the wastewater sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003632,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003633,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated precision study failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated precision study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003634,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the water sample were authorised.,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the water sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003635,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003636,"Documentation for the blank control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the blank control included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003637,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003638,The reference material demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The reference material demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003639,A total of 15 replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,A total of fifteen replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003640,A total of 2 replicate measurements were included in the proficiency test.,A total of two replicate measurements were included in the proficiency test.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003641,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of quantification failed.,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of quantification failed.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003642,The positive control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The positive control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003643,The method verification was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The method verification was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003644,The proficiency test demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The proficiency test demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003645,A total of 10 replicate measurements were included in the proficiency test.,A total of ten replicate measurements were included in the proficiency test.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003646,A total of 3 replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,A total of three replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003647,A total of 6 replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,A total of six replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003648,Results from the external quality assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the external quality assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003649,Results from the robustness study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the robustness study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003650,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated precision study failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated precision study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003651,A total of 10 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of ten replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003652,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003653,A total of 19 replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,A total of nineteen replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003654,A total of 5 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of five replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003655,The negative control was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003656,The negative control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The negative control demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003657,A total of 20 replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,A total of twenty replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003658,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003659,A total of 15 replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,A total of fifteen replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003660,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated robustness study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003661,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003662,Results from the method validation were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the method validation were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003663,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003664,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003665,The precision study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The precision study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003666,A total of 2 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of two replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003667,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003668,The robustness study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The robustness study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003669,The proficiency test result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The proficiency test result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003670,The negative control was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003671,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003672,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003673,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003674,The proficiency test was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,The proficiency test was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003675,A total of 3 replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,A total of three replicate measurements were included in the reproducibility study.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003676,A total of 12 replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,A total of twelve replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003677,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003678,The negative control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The negative control result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003679,The positive control was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,The positive control was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003680,"Documentation for the selectivity assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the selectivity assessment included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003681,A total of 7 replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,A total of seven replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003682,Results from the specificity assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the specificity assessment were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003683,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003684,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003685,A total of 20 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of twenty replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003686,The limit of quantification was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The limit of quantification was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003687,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reference material failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003688,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of detection failed.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003689,Results from the measurement uncertainty were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the measurement uncertainty were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003690,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003691,The blank control was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The blank control was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003692,The measurement uncertainty demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The measurement uncertainty demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003693,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,The vegetable sample was excluded from calculation because the associated positive control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003694,A total of 15 replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,A total of fifteen replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003695,A total of 2 replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,A total of two replicate measurements were included in the repeatability study.,quality_science,quality_control,repeatability study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003696,A total of 7 replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,A total of seven replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003697,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the sterility control.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003698,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003699,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003700,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003701,A total of 10 replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,A total of ten replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003702,The method verification was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the culture suspension were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003703,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003704,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003705,A total of 18 replicate measurements were included in the specificity assessment.,A total of eighteen replicate measurements were included in the specificity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003706,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003707,The robustness study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,The robustness study demonstrated that the method remained suitable for its intended purpose.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003708,Results from the blank control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the blank control were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003709,A total of 4 replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,A total of four replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003710,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The reproducibility study was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003711,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003712,Results from the precision study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,Results from the precision study were compared with the established laboratory acceptance range.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003713,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,The recovery study was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003714,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003715,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the method verification.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003716,The negative control was reviewed before results from the water sample were authorised.,The negative control was reviewed before results from the water sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003717,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003718,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated blank control failed.,The food sample was excluded from calculation because the associated blank control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003719,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003720,A total of 15 replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,A total of fifteen replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003721,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003722,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003723,The blank control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The blank control was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003724,A total of 11 replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,A total of eleven replicate measurements were included in the positive control.,quality_science,quality_control,positive control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003725,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003726,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the measurement uncertainty.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003727,"Documentation for the proficiency test included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.","Documentation for the proficiency test included the analyst, date, equipment, and reagent batch.",quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003728,The buffer blank was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,The buffer blank was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003729,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of quantification failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated limit of quantification failed.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003730,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The internal quality control was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003731,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003732,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003733,A total of 8 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of eight replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003734,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003735,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the external quality assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003736,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003737,A total of 8 replicate measurements were included in the blank control.,A total of eight replicate measurements were included in the blank control.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003738,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003739,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003740,The method verification was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003741,A total of 8 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of eight replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003742,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003743,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The measurement uncertainty was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003744,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the limit of detection.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003745,A total of 7 replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,A total of seven replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003746,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated measurement uncertainty failed.,quality_science,quality_control,measurement uncertainty,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003747,A total of 4 replicate measurements were included in the negative control.,A total of four replicate measurements were included in the negative control.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003748,The limit of quantification result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,The limit of quantification result met the predefined acceptance criteria for the analytical batch.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003749,The method verification was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the enrichment broth were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003750,A total of 11 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of eleven replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003751,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003752,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003753,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003754,The blank control was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The blank control was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003755,A total of 13 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of thirteen replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003756,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003757,A total of 18 replicate measurements were included in the blank control.,A total of eighteen replicate measurements were included in the blank control.,quality_science,quality_control,blank control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003758,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003759,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The selectivity assessment was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003760,The method validation was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The method validation was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003761,A total of 12 replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,A total of twelve replicate measurements were included in the robustness study.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003762,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003763,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the limit of quantification.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the limit of quantification.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of quantification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003764,A total of 9 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of nine replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003765,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated method verification failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003766,The method verification was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003767,A total of 10 replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,A total of ten replicate measurements were included in the recovery study.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003768,The recovery study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,The recovery study was repeated after a procedural deviation was identified.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003769,The method validation was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,The method validation was reviewed before results from the surface swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003770,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated negative control failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated negative control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,negative control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003771,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,The culture suspension was excluded from calculation because the associated external quality assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003772,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,The milk sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003773,The precision study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,The precision study was reviewed before results from the finished product sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003774,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003775,A total of 3 replicate measurements were included in the specificity assessment.,A total of three replicate measurements were included in the specificity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003776,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the environmental swab were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003777,The control sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,The control sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003778,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,The soil sample was excluded from calculation because the associated recovery study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,recovery study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003779,A total of 4 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of four replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003780,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,The finished product sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003781,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,The wastewater sample was excluded from calculation because the associated internal quality control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003782,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the reference material.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the reference material.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003783,The reference material was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,The reference material was reviewed before results from the vegetable sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,reference material,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003784,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated sterility control failed.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003785,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,The raw material sample was excluded from calculation because the associated selectivity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003786,A total of 18 replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,A total of eighteen replicate measurements were included in the selectivity assessment.,quality_science,quality_control,selectivity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003787,The precision study was reviewed before results from the wastewater sample were authorised.,The precision study was reviewed before results from the wastewater sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003788,The method verification was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,The method verification was reviewed before results from the raw material sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,method verification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003789,A total of 18 replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,A total of eighteen replicate measurements were included in the precision study.,quality_science,quality_control,precision study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003790,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the meat sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003791,A total of 16 replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,A total of sixteen replicate measurements were included in the internal quality control.,quality_science,quality_control,internal quality control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003792,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,The external quality assessment was reviewed before results from the soil sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,external quality assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003793,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,The limit of detection was reviewed before results from the control sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,limit of detection,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003794,A total of 11 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of eleven replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003795,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,The environmental swab was excluded from calculation because the associated proficiency test failed.,quality_science,quality_control,proficiency test,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003796,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reproducibility study failed.,The water sample was excluded from calculation because the associated reproducibility study failed.,quality_science,quality_control,reproducibility study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003797,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,The robustness study was reviewed before results from the buffer blank were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,robustness study,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003798,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,The meat sample was excluded from calculation because the associated specificity assessment failed.,quality_science,quality_control,specificity assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003799,A total of 4 replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,A total of four replicate measurements were included in the method validation.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003800,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,The sterility control was reviewed before results from the food sample were authorised.,quality_science,quality_control,sterility control,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003801,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,The enrichment broth was excluded from calculation because the associated method validation failed.,quality_science,quality_control,method validation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003802,Replicate measurements from protein concentration assay were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from protein concentration assay were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003803,The control response during immunofluorescence was within the expected range.,The control response during immunofluorescence was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003804,Replicate measurements from western blotting were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from western blotting were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003805,A negative control was included during protein purification to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during protein purification to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003806,The sample was diluted because the signal from enzyme assay exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from enzyme assay exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003807,The control response during protein purification was within the expected range.,The control response during protein purification was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003808,The control response during protein concentration assay was within the expected range.,The control response during protein concentration assay was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003809,A negative control was included during western blotting to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during western blotting to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003810,The sample was diluted because the signal from cell viability assay exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from cell viability assay exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003811,A negative control was included during ELISA to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during E L I S A to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003812,A negative control was included during protein concentration assay to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during protein concentration assay to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003813,The control response during protein expression was within the expected range.,The control response during protein expression was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003814,The sample was diluted because the signal from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from enzyme linked immunosorbent assay exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003815,A negative control was included during optical density measurement to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during optical density measurement to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003816,The control response during growth curve analysis was within the expected range.,The control response during growth curve analysis was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003817,The sample was diluted because the signal from optical density measurement exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from optical density measurement exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003818,The control response during enzyme assay was within the expected range.,The control response during enzyme assay was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003819,Replicate measurements from protein purification were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from protein purification were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003820,The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003821,Replicate measurements from optical density measurement were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from optical density measurement were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003822,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein concentration assay exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein concentration assay exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003823,The cell viability assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The cell viability assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003824,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein expression exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein expression exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003825,The western blotting experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The western blotting experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003826,Replicate measurements from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from enzyme linked immunosorbent assay were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003827,The cell viability assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The cell viability assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003828,The enzyme assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The enzyme assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003829,The cell culture was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The cell culture was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003830,The instrument settings were recorded before starting enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003831,The instrument settings were recorded before starting cell culture.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting cell culture.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003832,Replicate measurements from cell viability assay were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from cell viability assay were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003833,A negative control was included during enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during enzyme linked immunosorbent assay to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003834,Replicate measurements from cell culture were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from cell culture were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003835,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein expression.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein expression.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003836,The protein concentration assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The protein concentration assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003837,A negative control was included during cell viability assay to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during cell viability assay to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003838,The instrument settings were recorded before starting optical density measurement.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting optical density measurement.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003839,The control response during optical density measurement was within the expected range.,The control response during optical density measurement was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003840,The sample was diluted because the signal from immunofluorescence exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from immunofluorescence exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003841,The protein purification experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The protein purification experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003842,The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003843,The protein expression was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The protein expression was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003844,The instrument settings were recorded before starting western blotting.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting western blotting.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003845,The western blotting was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The western blotting was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003846,The instrument settings were recorded before starting enzyme assay.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting enzyme assay.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003847,The sample was diluted because the signal from western blotting exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from western blotting exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003848,The growth curve analysis was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The growth curve analysis was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003849,The immunofluorescence was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The immunofluorescence was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003850,Replicate measurements from immunofluorescence were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from immunofluorescence were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003851,A negative control was included during protein expression to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during protein expression to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003852,The control response during ELISA was within the expected range.,The control response during E L I S A was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003853,Replicate measurements from growth curve analysis were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from growth curve analysis were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003854,The ELISA was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The E L I S A was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003855,The ELISA experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The E L I S A experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003856,The control response during cell viability assay was within the expected range.,The control response during cell viability assay was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003857,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein purification.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein purification.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003858,The control response during western blotting was within the expected range.,The control response during western blotting was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,western blotting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003859,The instrument settings were recorded before starting ELISA.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting E L I S A.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003860,The protein expression experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The protein expression experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003861,The growth curve analysis experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The growth curve analysis experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003862,A negative control was included during growth curve analysis to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during growth curve analysis to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003863,The sample was diluted because the signal from ELISA exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from E L I S A exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003864,A negative control was included during enzyme assay to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during enzyme assay to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003865,The optical density measurement was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The optical density measurement was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003866,The control response during cell culture was within the expected range.,The control response during cell culture was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003867,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein concentration assay.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting protein concentration assay.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003868,The protein concentration assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The protein concentration assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein concentration assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003869,The enzyme assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The enzyme assay was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003870,The sample was diluted because the signal from cell culture exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from cell culture exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003871,The instrument settings were recorded before starting growth curve analysis.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting growth curve analysis.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003872,The immunofluorescence experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The immunofluorescence experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003873,The sample was diluted because the signal from growth curve analysis exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from growth curve analysis exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,growth curve analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003874,The optical density measurement experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The optical density measurement experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,optical density measurement,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003875,The cell culture experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,The cell culture experiment was repeated using freshly prepared reagents.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003876,The protein purification was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,The protein purification was performed according to the validated laboratory procedure.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003877,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein purification exceeded the calibration range.,The sample was diluted because the signal from protein purification exceeded the calibration range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein purification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003878,Replicate measurements from protein expression were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from protein expression were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,protein expression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003879,The control response during enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was within the expected range.,The control response during enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was within the expected range.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003880,A negative control was included during immunofluorescence to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during immunofluorescence to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003881,The instrument settings were recorded before starting immunofluorescence.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting immunofluorescence.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,immunofluorescence,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003882,Replicate measurements from enzyme assay were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from enzyme assay were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,enzyme assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003883,A negative control was included during cell culture to identify non-specific signal.,A negative control was included during cell culture to identify non specific signal.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell culture,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003884,Replicate measurements from ELISA were averaged before the result was reported.,Replicate measurements from E L I S A were averaged before the result was reported.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,ELISA,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003885,The instrument settings were recorded before starting cell viability assay.,The instrument settings were recorded before starting cell viability assay.,general_science,cell_and_protein_methods,cell viability assay,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003886,The coefficient of variation was 10 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 10 point 0 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003887,The calculation of coefficient of variation was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of coefficient of variation was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003888,The coefficient of variation was 4.8 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 4 point 8 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003889,The correlation coefficient indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The correlation coefficient indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003890,The reported correlation coefficient was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported correlation coefficient was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003891,The analyst checked the mean after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the mean after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003892,The mean was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The mean was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003893,The coefficient of variation was 1.2 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 1 point 2 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003894,The coefficient of variation was 5 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 5 point 0 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003895,The residual analysis was calculated from 29 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from twenty nine independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003896,The standard deviation was calculated from 17 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from seventeen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003897,The linear regression indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The linear regression indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003898,The reported confidence interval was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported confidence interval was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003899,The calculation of outlier assessment was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of outlier assessment was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003900,The median indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The median indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003901,The outlier assessment was calculated from 20 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from twenty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003902,The median was calculated from 19 independent measurements.,The median was calculated from nineteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003903,The analyst checked the median after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the median after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003904,The analyst checked the linear regression after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the linear regression after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003905,The calculation of linear regression was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of linear regression was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003906,The reported coefficient of variation was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported coefficient of variation was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003907,The calculation of median was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of median was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003908,The confidence interval was calculated from 23 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from twenty three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003909,The coefficient of variation was 3 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 3 point 0 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003910,The reported median was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported median was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003911,The calculation of correlation coefficient was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of correlation coefficient was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003912,The linear regression was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The linear regression was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003913,The coefficient of variation was 7.5 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 7 point 5 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003914,The outlier assessment was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The outlier assessment was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003915,The confidence interval indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The confidence interval indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003916,The analyst checked the correlation coefficient after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the correlation coefficient after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003917,The calculation of standard deviation was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of standard deviation was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003918,The reported residual analysis was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported residual analysis was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003919,The mean indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The mean indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003920,The calculation of residual analysis was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of residual analysis was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003921,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 16 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from sixteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003922,The coefficient of variation was 12.5 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 12 point 5 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003923,The reported outlier assessment was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported outlier assessment was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003924,The reported mean was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported mean was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003925,The analyst checked the residual analysis after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the residual analysis after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003926,The coefficient of variation indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The coefficient of variation indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003927,The calculation of confidence interval was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of confidence interval was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003928,The coefficient of variation was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The coefficient of variation was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003929,The analyst checked the calibration curve after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the calibration curve after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003930,The confidence interval was calculated from 11 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from eleven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003931,The coefficient of variation was 2.5 percent across the replicate measurements.,The coefficient of variation was 2 point 5 percent across the replicate measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003932,The median was calculated from 29 independent measurements.,The median was calculated from twenty nine independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003933,The calculation of calibration curve was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of calibration curve was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003934,The standard deviation was calculated from 22 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from twenty two independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003935,The calibration curve indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The calibration curve indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003936,The standard deviation indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The standard deviation indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003937,The reported linear regression was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported linear regression was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003938,The calibration curve was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The calibration curve was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003939,The outlier assessment was calculated from 15 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from fifteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003940,The reported standard deviation was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported standard deviation was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003941,The analyst checked the coefficient of variation after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the coefficient of variation after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003942,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 14 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from fourteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003943,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 18 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from eighteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003944,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 27 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from twenty seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003945,The reported calibration curve was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,The reported calibration curve was reviewed before the dataset was approved.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003946,The confidence interval was calculated from 10 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from ten independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003947,The residual analysis indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The residual analysis indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003948,The median was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The median was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003949,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 3 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003950,The mean was calculated from 20 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from twenty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003951,The residual analysis was calculated from 26 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from twenty six independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003952,The standard deviation was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The standard deviation was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003953,The analyst checked the outlier assessment after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the outlier assessment after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003954,The analyst checked the standard deviation after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the standard deviation after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003955,The outlier assessment indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,The outlier assessment indicated acceptable agreement between the replicate results.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003956,The confidence interval was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The confidence interval was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003957,The outlier assessment was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003958,The linear regression was calculated from 20 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from twenty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003959,The residual analysis was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The residual analysis was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003960,The calculation of mean was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,The calculation of mean was repeated after the transcription error was corrected.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003961,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003962,The linear regression was calculated from 5 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003963,The mean was calculated from 17 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from seventeen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003964,The correlation coefficient was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,The correlation coefficient was included in the final scientific report with the raw observations.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003965,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 17 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from seventeen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003966,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 27 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from twenty seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003967,The mean was calculated from 4 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from four independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003968,The mean was calculated from 8 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from eight independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003969,The mean was calculated from 14 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from fourteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003970,The outlier assessment was calculated from 21 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from twenty one independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003971,The linear regression was calculated from 28 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from twenty eight independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003972,The residual analysis was calculated from 4 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from four independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003973,The residual analysis was calculated from 16 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from sixteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003974,The confidence interval was calculated from 30 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from thirty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003975,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 22 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from twenty two independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003976,The residual analysis was calculated from 10 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from ten independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003977,The standard deviation was calculated from 14 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from fourteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003978,The standard deviation was calculated from 27 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from twenty seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003979,The standard deviation was calculated from 15 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from fifteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003980,The mean was calculated from 5 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003981,The confidence interval was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003982,The mean was calculated from 23 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from twenty three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003983,The standard deviation was calculated from 21 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from twenty one independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003984,The linear regression was calculated from 12 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from twelve independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003985,The calibration curve was calculated from 24 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from twenty four independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003986,The median was calculated from 23 independent measurements.,The median was calculated from twenty three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003987,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 19 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from nineteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003988,The calibration curve was calculated from 22 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from twenty two independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003989,The residual analysis was calculated from 5 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003990,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003991,The standard deviation was calculated from 12 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from twelve independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003992,The median was calculated from 13 independent measurements.,The median was calculated from thirteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_003993,The linear regression was calculated from 6 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from six independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003994,The confidence interval was calculated from 24 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from twenty four independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003995,The coefficient of variation was calculated from 13 independent measurements.,The coefficient of variation was calculated from thirteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,coefficient of variation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003996,The standard deviation was calculated from 7 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003997,The calibration curve was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_003998,The outlier assessment was calculated from 7 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_003999,The mean was calculated from 22 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from twenty two independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004000,The mean was calculated from 18 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from eighteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004001,The confidence interval was calculated from 9 independent measurements.,The confidence interval was calculated from nine independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004002,The calibration curve was calculated from 30 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from thirty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004003,The outlier assessment was calculated from 9 independent measurements.,The outlier assessment was calculated from nine independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,outlier assessment,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004004,The analyst checked the confidence interval after excluding the invalid control measurement.,The analyst checked the confidence interval after excluding the invalid control measurement.,quantitative_science,statistics,confidence interval,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004005,The mean was calculated from 3 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004006,The mean was calculated from 25 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from twenty five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004007,The standard deviation was calculated from 30 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from thirty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004008,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 20 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from twenty independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004009,The median was calculated from 6 independent measurements.,The median was calculated from six independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,median,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004010,The correlation coefficient was calculated from 6 independent measurements.,The correlation coefficient was calculated from six independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,correlation coefficient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004011,The linear regression was calculated from 24 independent measurements.,The linear regression was calculated from twenty four independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,linear regression,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004012,The residual analysis was calculated from 9 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from nine independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004013,The residual analysis was calculated from 19 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from nineteen independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004014,The calibration curve was calculated from 23 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from twenty three independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004015,The calibration curve was calculated from 5 independent measurements.,The calibration curve was calculated from five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,calibration curve,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004016,The residual analysis was calculated from 7 independent measurements.,The residual analysis was calculated from seven independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,residual analysis,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004017,The mean was calculated from 10 independent measurements.,The mean was calculated from ten independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,mean,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004018,The standard deviation was calculated from 5 independent measurements.,The standard deviation was calculated from five independent measurements.,quantitative_science,statistics,standard deviation,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004019,The reported coliforms result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004020,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004021,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004022,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004023,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004024,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004025,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004026,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004027,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004028,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004029,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004030,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004031,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004032,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004033,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004034,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004035,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004036,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004037,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004038,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004039,Enumeration of total viable count in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004040,The river water sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,The river water sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004041,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004042,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004043,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004044,The reported Salmonella species result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004045,The raw milk sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004046,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004047,The reported coliforms result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004048,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004049,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004050,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004051,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004052,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004053,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004054,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004055,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004056,The cooked meat sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004057,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004058,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004059,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004060,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004061,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004062,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004063,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004064,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004065,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004066,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004067,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004068,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004069,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004070,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004071,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004072,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004073,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004074,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004075,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004076,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004077,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004078,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004079,The food contact surface sample was tested for Bacillus cereus using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for Bacillus cereus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004080,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004081,The reported Salmonella species result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004082,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004083,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004084,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004085,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004086,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004087,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004088,The reported Salmonella species result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004089,The raw milk sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004090,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004091,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004092,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004093,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004094,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004095,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004096,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004097,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004098,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004099,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004100,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004101,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004102,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004103,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004104,The raw meat sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The raw meat sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004105,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004106,The food contact surface sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004107,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004108,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004109,The reported Escherichia coli result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004110,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004111,The vegetable product sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,The vegetable product sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004112,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004113,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004114,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004115,The food contact surface sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004116,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004117,The cooked meat sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004118,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004119,Enumeration of coliforms in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the food contact surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004120,Enumeration of coliforms in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004121,The food contact surface sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004122,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004123,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004124,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004125,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004126,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004127,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004128,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004129,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004130,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004131,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004132,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004133,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004134,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004135,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004136,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004137,The reported Escherichia coli result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004138,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004139,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004140,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004141,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004142,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004143,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004144,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004145,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004146,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004147,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004148,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004149,The pasteurised milk sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The pasteurised milk sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004150,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004151,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004152,The process water sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The process water sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004153,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004154,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004155,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004156,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004157,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004158,The drinking water sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The drinking water sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004159,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004160,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004161,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004162,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004163,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004164,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004165,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004166,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004167,The process water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The process water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004168,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004169,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004170,The process water sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,The process water sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004171,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004172,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004173,The reported Escherichia coli result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004174,The reported coliforms result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004175,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004176,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004177,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004178,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004179,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004180,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004181,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004182,The reported Escherichia coli result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004183,The cooked meat sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004184,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004185,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004186,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004187,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004188,The environmental surface sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The environmental surface sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004189,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004190,The reported coliforms result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004191,The vegetable product sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The vegetable product sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004192,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004193,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004194,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004195,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004196,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004197,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004198,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004199,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004200,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004201,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004202,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004203,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004204,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004205,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004206,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004207,The food contact surface sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004208,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004209,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004210,The reported Escherichia coli result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004211,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004212,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004213,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004214,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004215,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004216,The reported total viable count result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004217,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004218,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004219,Enumeration of total viable count in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004220,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004221,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004222,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004223,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004224,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004225,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested cooked meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004226,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004227,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004228,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004229,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004230,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004231,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004232,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004233,The cooked meat sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004234,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004235,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004236,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004237,The reported Salmonella species result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004238,The reported total viable count result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004239,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004240,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004241,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004242,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004243,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004244,Enumeration of total viable count in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004245,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004246,Enumeration of coliforms in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004247,The raw milk sample was tested for Bacillus cereus using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for Bacillus cereus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004248,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004249,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004250,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004251,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004252,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004253,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004254,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004255,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004256,The reported total viable count result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004257,Enumeration of coliforms in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004258,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004259,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004260,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004261,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004262,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004263,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004264,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004265,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004266,The environmental surface sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The environmental surface sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004267,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004268,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The river water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004269,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004270,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004271,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004272,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004273,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004274,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,No presumptive Staphylococcus aureus colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004275,The river water sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,The river water sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004276,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004277,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004278,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004279,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004280,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The food contact surface sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004281,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004282,The river water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The river water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004283,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004284,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004285,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004286,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004287,The reported coliforms result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004288,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004289,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004290,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004291,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004292,The reported coliforms result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004293,The wastewater sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004294,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The cooked meat sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004295,The vegetable product sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The vegetable product sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004296,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004297,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004298,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004299,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004300,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004301,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004302,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004303,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004304,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004305,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004306,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004307,The reported coliforms result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004308,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004309,The wastewater sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004310,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004311,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004312,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004313,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004314,The environmental surface sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,The environmental surface sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004315,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004316,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004317,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004318,The drinking water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The drinking water sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004319,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004320,Enumeration of coliforms in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004321,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004322,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004323,The reported total viable count result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004324,The reported Salmonella species result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004325,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the raw milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004326,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004327,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004328,The cooked meat sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for coliforms using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004329,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004330,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004331,The reported total viable count result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004332,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004333,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004334,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004335,The cooked meat sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The cooked meat sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004336,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004337,The wastewater sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004338,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004339,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004340,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004341,The process water sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The process water sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004342,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004343,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004344,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004345,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004346,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004347,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004348,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004349,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004350,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004351,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the process water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004352,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004353,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004354,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004355,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004356,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004357,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested ready-to-eat food sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004358,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004359,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004360,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004361,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The powdered ingredient sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004362,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004363,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004364,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004365,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004366,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004367,The raw meat sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The raw meat sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004368,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,The raw milk sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004369,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004370,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004371,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004372,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the powdered ingredient sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004373,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004374,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004375,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the total viable count control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004376,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004377,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004378,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004379,The pasteurised milk sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The pasteurised milk sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004380,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004381,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004382,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the cooked meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004383,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004384,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004385,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004386,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004387,The food contact surface sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004388,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the ready-to-eat food sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004389,The reported total viable count result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004390,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004391,The raw milk sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004392,The raw milk sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004393,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004394,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004395,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004396,The food contact surface sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The food contact surface sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004397,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004398,The raw meat sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The raw meat sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004399,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Enterobacteriaceae control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004400,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,The Escherichia coli result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the pasteurised milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004401,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004402,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004403,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004404,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004405,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested wastewater sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004406,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004407,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004408,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004409,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004410,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004411,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the drinking water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004412,Enumeration of coliforms in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004413,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004414,The reported Escherichia coli result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004415,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,A representative portion of the food contact surface sample was prepared before testing for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004416,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004417,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the yeasts and moulds control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004418,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004419,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004420,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004421,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested environmental surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004422,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004423,The river water sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The river water sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004424,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004425,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested vegetable product sample.,No presumptive Enterobacteriaceae colonies were observed in the tested vegetable product sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004426,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004427,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004428,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004429,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004430,The process water sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,The process water sample was tested for Pseudomonas species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004431,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,The ready-to-eat food sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004432,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the powdered ingredient sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004433,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004434,The reported total viable count result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the environmental surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004435,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004436,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004437,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004438,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004439,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004440,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004441,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested raw meat sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004442,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004443,The raw meat sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The raw meat sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004444,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004445,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004446,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004447,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004448,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the Escherichia coli control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004449,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004450,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Bacillus cereus result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004451,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The pasteurised milk sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004452,The reported coliforms result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported coliforms result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004453,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the river water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004454,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004455,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004456,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004457,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The wastewater sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004458,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004459,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004460,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004461,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the food contact surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004462,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004463,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The lactic acid bacteria result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004464,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004465,The reported Escherichia coli result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004466,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,The pasteurised milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004467,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,The vegetable product sample required repeat analysis because the Listeria monocytogenes control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004468,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004469,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004470,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004471,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004472,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,The yeasts and moulds result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004473,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the coliforms control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004474,The wastewater sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for Salmonella species using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004475,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,No presumptive Bacillus cereus colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004476,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004477,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004478,Enumeration of total viable count in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004479,The environmental surface sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The environmental surface sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004480,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,The coliforms result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004481,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004482,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,A representative portion of the raw milk sample was prepared before testing for Staphylococcus aureus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004483,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004484,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested river water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004485,Enumeration of coliforms in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of coliforms in the vegetable product sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004486,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for coliforms.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004487,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the drinking water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004488,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004489,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004490,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,A representative portion of the environmental surface sample was prepared before testing for Escherichia coli.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004491,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,The powdered ingredient sample required repeat analysis because the Salmonella species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004492,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of yeasts and moulds in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004493,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004494,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the drinking water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004495,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested pasteurised milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004496,The reported Salmonella species result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004497,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004498,Enumeration of total viable count in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the drinking water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004499,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The wastewater sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004500,The reported Salmonella species result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Salmonella species result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004501,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The Enterobacteriaceae result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004502,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004503,The river water sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The river water sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004504,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004505,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,The Salmonella species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw meat batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004506,The vegetable product sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,The vegetable product sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004507,The reported Escherichia coli result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Escherichia coli result for the food contact surface sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004508,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,The Staphylococcus aureus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the raw milk batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004509,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004510,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,The total viable count result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the ready-to-eat food batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004511,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004512,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The drinking water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004513,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for total viable count.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004514,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive Listeria monocytogenes colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004515,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,No presumptive lactic acid bacteria colonies were observed in the tested drinking water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004516,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive Salmonella species colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004517,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,A representative portion of the vegetable product sample was prepared before testing for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004518,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Listeria monocytogenes result for the process water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004519,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,The Listeria monocytogenes result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the river water batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004520,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the wastewater sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004521,The reported total viable count result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004522,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,The process water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Salmonella species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004523,The raw meat sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,The raw meat sample was tested for yeasts and moulds using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004524,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Escherichia coli in the environmental surface sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004525,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,No presumptive coliforms colonies were observed in the tested raw milk sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,coliforms|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004526,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004527,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in the river water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004528,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004529,The vegetable product sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The vegetable product sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004530,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,The raw meat sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004531,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004532,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004533,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Pseudomonas species result for the raw meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004534,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the vegetable product batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004535,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,The process water sample required repeat analysis because the Bacillus cereus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004536,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,No presumptive yeasts and moulds colonies were observed in the tested process water sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004537,The wastewater sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for Enterobacteriaceae using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004538,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the powdered ingredient batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004539,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported lactic acid bacteria result for the cooked meat sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004540,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Pseudomonas species in the ready-to-eat food sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004541,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The environmental surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004542,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Escherichia coli using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004543,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The raw milk sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004544,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004545,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,The powdered ingredient sample was tested for total viable count using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004546,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,No presumptive Pseudomonas species colonies were observed in the tested food contact surface sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004547,The reported total viable count result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported total viable count result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004548,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the powdered ingredient sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004549,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,The food contact surface sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|food contact surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004550,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,The Bacillus cereus result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the wastewater batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004551,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested vegetable product sample.,No presumptive Escherichia coli colonies were observed in the tested vegetable product sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Escherichia coli|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004552,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the raw milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004553,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,The raw meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Bacillus cereus.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004554,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the pasteurised milk sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004555,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Salmonella species in the process water sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Salmonella species|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004556,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,The Pseudomonas species result was authorised only after all quality control checks for the environmental surface batch had passed.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004557,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the wastewater sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004558,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Enterobacteriaceae result for the river water sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004559,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Listeria monocytogenes.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004560,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,The river water sample showed mixed background flora during examination for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|river water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004561,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the ready-to-eat food sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004562,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in the wastewater sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004563,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported Staphylococcus aureus result for the pasteurised milk sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004564,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,The vegetable product sample showed mixed background flora during examination for lactic acid bacteria.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004565,The wastewater sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,The wastewater sample was tested for lactic acid bacteria using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|wastewater,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004566,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,No presumptive total viable count colonies were observed in the tested powdered ingredient sample.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|powdered ingredient,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004567,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,The ready-to-eat food sample required repeat analysis because the lactic acid bacteria control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,lactic acid bacteria|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004568,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in the pasteurised milk sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Bacillus cereus|pasteurised milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004569,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,The drinking water sample required repeat analysis because the Pseudomonas species control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|drinking water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004570,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,A representative portion of the process water sample was prepared before testing for Enterobacteriaceae.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Enterobacteriaceae|process water,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004571,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,The reported yeasts and moulds result for the vegetable product sample was checked against the method reporting limit.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|vegetable product,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004572,The raw milk sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,The raw milk sample was tested for Staphylococcus aureus using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|raw milk,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004573,Enumeration of total viable count in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,Enumeration of total viable count in the raw meat sample was completed after the required incubation period.,microbiology,food_water_environment,total viable count|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004574,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,The ready-to-eat food sample was tested for Listeria monocytogenes using the routine microbiological method.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Listeria monocytogenes|ready-to-eat food,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004575,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,A representative portion of the raw meat sample was prepared before testing for yeasts and moulds.,microbiology,food_water_environment,yeasts and moulds|raw meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004576,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,The environmental surface sample required repeat analysis because the Staphylococcus aureus control result was invalid.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Staphylococcus aureus|environmental surface,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004577,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,A representative portion of the cooked meat sample was prepared before testing for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004578,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,The cooked meat sample showed mixed background flora during examination for Pseudomonas species.,microbiology,food_water_environment,Pseudomonas species|cooked meat,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004579,The analyst confirmed that MALDI-TOF referred to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that MALDI T O F referred to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004580,The analyst confirmed that TSC referred to tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that T S C referred to tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004581,The abbreviation XLD was used in the laboratory record for xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.,The abbreviation X L D was used in the laboratory record for xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004582,The analyst confirmed that RNA referred to ribonucleic acid in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that R N A referred to ribonucleic acid in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004583,"The worksheet displayed DRBC alongside the full scientific name, dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.","The worksheet displayed D R B C alongside the full scientific name, dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004584,The analyst confirmed that MIC referred to minimum inhibitory concentration in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that M I C referred to minimum inhibitory concentration in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004585,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both PCA and the full term plate count agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both P C A and the full term plate count agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004586,The abbreviation TSC was used in the laboratory record for tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.,The abbreviation T S C was used in the laboratory record for tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004587,The analyst confirmed that DRBC referred to dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that D R B C referred to dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004588,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both TCBS and the full term thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both T C B S and the full term thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004589,The abbreviation DRBC was used in the laboratory record for dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.,The abbreviation D R B C was used in the laboratory record for dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004590,The abbreviation TCBS was used in the laboratory record for thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,The abbreviation T C B S was used in the laboratory record for thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004591,"The worksheet displayed TCBS alongside the full scientific name, thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.","The worksheet displayed T C B S alongside the full scientific name, thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004592,The abbreviation PCA was used in the laboratory record for plate count agar.,The abbreviation P C A was used in the laboratory record for plate count agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004593,The abbreviation TBX was used in the laboratory record for tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.,The abbreviation T B X was used in the laboratory record for tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004594,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation CFU after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation C F U after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004595,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both qPCR and the full term quantitative polymerase chain reaction.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both Q P C R and the full term quantitative polymerase chain reaction.,scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004596,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation VRBGA after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation V R B G A after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004597,"The procedure described xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, commonly abbreviated as XLD.","The procedure described xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, commonly abbreviated as X L D.",scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004598,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation RNA after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation R N A after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004599,"The procedure described minimum inhibitory concentration, commonly abbreviated as MIC.","The procedure described minimum inhibitory concentration, commonly abbreviated as M I C.",scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004600,The abbreviation VRBGA was used in the laboratory record for violet red bile glucose agar.,The abbreviation V R B G A was used in the laboratory record for violet red bile glucose agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004601,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both mCCDA and the full term modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both M C C D A and the full term modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004602,"The procedure described thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar, commonly abbreviated as TCBS.","The procedure described thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar, commonly abbreviated as T C B S.",scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004603,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both MIC and the full term minimum inhibitory concentration.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both M I C and the full term minimum inhibitory concentration.,scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004604,"The procedure described dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar, commonly abbreviated as DRBC.","The procedure described dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar, commonly abbreviated as D R B C.",scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004605,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation MIC after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation M I C after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004606,"The worksheet displayed PCR alongside the full scientific name, polymerase chain reaction.","The worksheet displayed P C R alongside the full scientific name, polymerase chain reaction.",scientific_language,acronyms,PCR|polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004607,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both CFU and the full term colony forming units.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both C F U and the full term colony forming units.,scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004608,The analyst confirmed that mCCDA referred to modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that M C C D A referred to modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004609,"The worksheet displayed mCCDA alongside the full scientific name, modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.","The worksheet displayed M C C D A alongside the full scientific name, modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004610,The abbreviation RNA was used in the laboratory record for ribonucleic acid.,The abbreviation R N A was used in the laboratory record for ribonucleic acid.,scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004611,The analyst confirmed that MYP referred to mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that M Y P referred to mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004612,"The worksheet displayed TBX alongside the full scientific name, tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.","The worksheet displayed T B X alongside the full scientific name, tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004613,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both RNA and the full term ribonucleic acid.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both R N A and the full term ribonucleic acid.,scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004614,"The procedure described plate count agar, commonly abbreviated as PCA.","The procedure described plate count agar, commonly abbreviated as P C A.",scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004615,The analyst confirmed that PCA referred to plate count agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that P C A referred to plate count agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004616,"The worksheet displayed TSC alongside the full scientific name, tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.","The worksheet displayed T S C alongside the full scientific name, tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004617,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation XLD after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation X L D after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004618,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation TBX after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation T B X after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004619,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation MALDI-TOF after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation MALDI T O F after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004620,The abbreviation MRS was used in the laboratory record for de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.,The abbreviation M R S was used in the laboratory record for de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004621,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both MYP and the full term mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both M Y P and the full term mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004622,The abbreviation qPCR was used in the laboratory record for quantitative polymerase chain reaction.,The abbreviation Q P C R was used in the laboratory record for quantitative polymerase chain reaction.,scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004623,"The procedure described ribonucleic acid, commonly abbreviated as RNA.","The procedure described ribonucleic acid, commonly abbreviated as R N A.",scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004624,"The worksheet displayed RNA alongside the full scientific name, ribonucleic acid.","The worksheet displayed R N A alongside the full scientific name, ribonucleic acid.",scientific_language,acronyms,RNA|ribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004625,"The procedure described quantitative polymerase chain reaction, commonly abbreviated as qPCR.","The procedure described quantitative polymerase chain reaction, commonly abbreviated as Q P C R.",scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004626,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both DRBC and the full term dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both D R B C and the full term dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004627,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both XLD and the full term xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both X L D and the full term xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004628,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both TBX and the full term tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both T B X and the full term tryptone bile X glucuronide agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004629,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both DNA and the full term deoxyribonucleic acid.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both D N A and the full term deoxyribonucleic acid.,scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004630,The abbreviation DNA was used in the laboratory record for deoxyribonucleic acid.,The abbreviation D N A was used in the laboratory record for deoxyribonucleic acid.,scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004631,The abbreviation CFU was used in the laboratory record for colony forming units.,The abbreviation C F U was used in the laboratory record for colony forming units.,scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004632,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation mCCDA after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation M C C D A after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004633,"The worksheet displayed MYP alongside the full scientific name, mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.","The worksheet displayed M Y P alongside the full scientific name, mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004634,"The procedure described de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar, commonly abbreviated as MRS.","The procedure described de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar, commonly abbreviated as M R S.",scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004635,"The procedure described colony forming units, commonly abbreviated as CFU.","The procedure described colony forming units, commonly abbreviated as C F U.",scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004636,"The worksheet displayed VRBGA alongside the full scientific name, violet red bile glucose agar.","The worksheet displayed V R B G A alongside the full scientific name, violet red bile glucose agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004637,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation MRS after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation M R S after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004638,"The procedure described tryptone bile X glucuronide agar, commonly abbreviated as TBX.","The procedure described tryptone bile X glucuronide agar, commonly abbreviated as T B X.",scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004639,"The worksheet displayed MIC alongside the full scientific name, minimum inhibitory concentration.","The worksheet displayed M I C alongside the full scientific name, minimum inhibitory concentration.",scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004640,"The worksheet displayed CFU alongside the full scientific name, colony forming units.","The worksheet displayed C F U alongside the full scientific name, colony forming units.",scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004641,The analyst confirmed that PCR referred to polymerase chain reaction in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that P C R referred to polymerase chain reaction in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCR|polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004642,The analyst confirmed that CFU referred to colony forming units in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that C F U referred to colony forming units in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,CFU|colony forming units,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004643,The analyst confirmed that MRS referred to de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that M R S referred to de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004644,The abbreviation MYP was used in the laboratory record for mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.,The abbreviation M Y P was used in the laboratory record for mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004645,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation qPCR after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation Q P C R after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004646,"The worksheet displayed DNA alongside the full scientific name, deoxyribonucleic acid.","The worksheet displayed D N A alongside the full scientific name, deoxyribonucleic acid.",scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004647,The abbreviation MIC was used in the laboratory record for minimum inhibitory concentration.,The abbreviation M I C was used in the laboratory record for minimum inhibitory concentration.,scientific_language,acronyms,MIC|minimum inhibitory concentration,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004648,"The worksheet displayed XLD alongside the full scientific name, xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.","The worksheet displayed X L D alongside the full scientific name, xylose lysine deoxycholate agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004649,"The procedure described tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar, commonly abbreviated as TSC.","The procedure described tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar, commonly abbreviated as T S C.",scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004650,"The worksheet displayed qPCR alongside the full scientific name, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.","The worksheet displayed Q P C R alongside the full scientific name, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.",scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004651,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation DNA after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation D N A after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004652,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation DRBC after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation D R B C after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,DRBC|dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004653,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation PCR after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation P C R after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCR|polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004654,"The worksheet displayed MRS alongside the full scientific name, de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.","The worksheet displayed M R S alongside the full scientific name, de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004655,The analyst confirmed that DNA referred to deoxyribonucleic acid in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that D N A referred to deoxyribonucleic acid in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004656,The analyst confirmed that TCBS referred to thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that T C B S referred to thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004657,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation PCA after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation P C A after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004658,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation TCBS after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation T C B S after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,TCBS|thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004659,The analyst confirmed that TBX referred to tryptone bile X glucuronide agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that T B X referred to tryptone bile X glucuronide agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,TBX|tryptone bile X glucuronide agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004660,The abbreviation PCR was used in the laboratory record for polymerase chain reaction.,The abbreviation P C R was used in the laboratory record for polymerase chain reaction.,scientific_language,acronyms,PCR|polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004661,The analyst confirmed that XLD referred to xylose lysine deoxycholate agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that X L D referred to xylose lysine deoxycholate agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,XLD|xylose lysine deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004662,The analyst confirmed that qPCR referred to quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that Q P C R referred to quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,qPCR|quantitative polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004663,"The procedure described mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar, commonly abbreviated as MYP.","The procedure described mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar, commonly abbreviated as M Y P.",scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004664,"The procedure described matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry, commonly abbreviated as MALDI-TOF.","The procedure described matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry, commonly abbreviated as MALDI T O F.",scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004665,"The worksheet displayed PCA alongside the full scientific name, plate count agar.","The worksheet displayed P C A alongside the full scientific name, plate count agar.",scientific_language,acronyms,PCA|plate count agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004666,The abbreviation mCCDA was used in the laboratory record for modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.,The abbreviation M C C D A was used in the laboratory record for modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004667,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation TSC after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation T S C after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004668,"The procedure described modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar, commonly abbreviated as mCCDA.","The procedure described modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar, commonly abbreviated as M C C D A.",scientific_language,acronyms,mCCDA|modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004669,"The worksheet displayed MALDI-TOF alongside the full scientific name, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.","The worksheet displayed MALDI T O F alongside the full scientific name, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.",scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004670,The abbreviation MALDI-TOF was used in the laboratory record for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.,The abbreviation MALDI T O F was used in the laboratory record for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.,scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004671,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both TSC and the full term tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both T S C and the full term tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,TSC|tryptose sulfite cycloserine agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004672,"The procedure described polymerase chain reaction, commonly abbreviated as PCR.","The procedure described polymerase chain reaction, commonly abbreviated as P C R.",scientific_language,acronyms,PCR|polymerase chain reaction,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004673,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both MRS and the full term de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both M R S and the full term de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,MRS|de Man Rogosa and Sharpe agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004674,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both MALDI-TOF and the full term matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both MALDI T O F and the full term matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.,scientific_language,acronyms,MALDI-TOF|matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004675,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation MYP after the calculation was checked.,The result was entered using the standard abbreviation M Y P after the calculation was checked.,scientific_language,acronyms,MYP|mannitol egg yolk polymyxin agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004676,"The procedure described violet red bile glucose agar, commonly abbreviated as VRBGA.","The procedure described violet red bile glucose agar, commonly abbreviated as V R B G A.",scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004677,The analyst confirmed that VRBGA referred to violet red bile glucose agar in the current method.,The analyst confirmed that V R B G A referred to violet red bile glucose agar in the current method.,scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004678,"The procedure described deoxyribonucleic acid, commonly abbreviated as DNA.","The procedure described deoxyribonucleic acid, commonly abbreviated as D N A.",scientific_language,acronyms,DNA|deoxyribonucleic acid,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004679,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both VRBGA and the full term violet red bile glucose agar.,The training exercise required the analyst to recognise both V R B G A and the full term violet red bile glucose agar.,scientific_language,acronyms,VRBGA|violet red bile glucose agar,hard,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004680,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004681,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004682,The sample neutralisation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The sample neutralisation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004683,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next environmental swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004684,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next meat sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004685,The colony isolation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The colony isolation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004686,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through pre-enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through pre enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004687,The enrichment broth underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The enrichment broth underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004688,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004689,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004690,The swab extraction procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The swab extraction procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004691,The analyst changed gloves before beginning membrane filtration on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning membrane filtration on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004692,The membrane filtration step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The membrane filtration step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004693,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during cryogenic storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during cryogenic storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004694,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004695,The meat sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004696,The colony isolation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The colony isolation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004697,The culture suspension remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The culture suspension remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004698,The milk sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The milk sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004699,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004700,The plate inoculation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The plate inoculation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004701,The wastewater sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The wastewater sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004702,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004703,The finished product sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004704,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004705,The refrigerated storage procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The refrigerated storage procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004706,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004707,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout pre-enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout pre enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004708,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout room-temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout room temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004709,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004710,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004711,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004712,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next environmental swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004713,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during cryogenic storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during cryogenic storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004714,The pre-enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The pre enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004715,The selective enrichment step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The selective enrichment step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004716,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next finished product sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004717,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through membrane filtration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through membrane filtration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004718,The broth inoculation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The broth inoculation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004719,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during broth inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during broth inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004720,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004721,The sample enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The sample enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004722,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004723,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004724,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next food sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004725,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004726,The enrichment broth underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The enrichment broth underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004727,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004728,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004729,The culture suspension underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The culture suspension underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004730,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the water sample through broth inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the water sample through broth inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004731,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004732,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during aseptic technique.,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during aseptic technique.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004733,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004734,The documented method specified pre-enrichment to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified pre enrichment to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004735,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004736,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004737,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004738,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004739,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the surface swab.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004740,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004741,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during broth inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during broth inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004742,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during swab extraction.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during swab extraction.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004743,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004744,The vegetable sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The vegetable sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004745,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during selective enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during selective enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004746,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004747,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004748,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during room-temperature equilibration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during room temperature equilibration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004749,The broth inoculation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004750,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004751,The enrichment broth underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The enrichment broth underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004752,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout pre-enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout pre enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004753,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004754,The membrane filtration procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The membrane filtration procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004755,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004756,The buffer blank underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The buffer blank underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004757,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004758,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample neutralisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample neutralisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004759,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during cryogenic storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during cryogenic storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004760,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during room-temperature equilibration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during room temperature equilibration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004761,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the water sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004762,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the water sample.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004763,The control sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004764,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004765,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004766,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004767,The wastewater sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The wastewater sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004768,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004769,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004770,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the control sample.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004771,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next water sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004772,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004773,The environmental swab underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The environmental swab underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004774,The food sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004775,The culture suspension underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The culture suspension underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004776,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004777,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through culture purification and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through culture purification and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004778,The membrane filtration step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The membrane filtration step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004779,The buffer blank underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The buffer blank underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004780,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004781,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next raw material sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004782,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004783,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004784,The finished product sample remained clearly labelled throughout room-temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,The finished product sample remained clearly labelled throughout room temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004785,The vegetable sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The vegetable sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004786,The sample homogenisation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the soil sample.,The sample homogenisation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004787,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004788,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004789,The documented method specified pre-enrichment to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified pre enrichment to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004790,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during selective enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during selective enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004791,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout pre-enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout pre enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004792,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004793,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next food sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004794,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004795,The plate inoculation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004796,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during refrigerated storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during refrigerated storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004797,The plate inoculation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004798,The colony isolation step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The colony isolation step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004799,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the environmental swab through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the environmental swab through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004800,The sample homogenisation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The sample homogenisation procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004801,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004802,The surface swab underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004803,The aseptic technique procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The aseptic technique procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004804,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004805,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004806,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004807,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004808,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004809,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004810,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during room-temperature equilibration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during room temperature equilibration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004811,The plate inoculation step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004812,The surface swab underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004813,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004814,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004815,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004816,The surface swab underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004817,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004818,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004819,The aseptic technique step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The aseptic technique step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004820,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004821,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004822,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004823,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004824,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004825,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004826,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next raw material sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004827,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004828,The food sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004829,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during aseptic technique.,A sterile control was handled alongside the raw material sample during aseptic technique.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004830,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004831,The food sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004832,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next meat sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004833,The water sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004834,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004835,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004836,The soil sample underwent pre-enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The soil sample underwent pre enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004837,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through culture purification and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through culture purification and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004838,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004839,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next environmental swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004840,The raw material sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004841,The buffer blank underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The buffer blank underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004842,The cryogenic storage procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The cryogenic storage procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004843,The selective enrichment step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the surface swab.,The selective enrichment step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004844,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004845,The finished product sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004846,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004847,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through plate inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through plate inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004848,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the environmental swab through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the environmental swab through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004849,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004850,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004851,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004852,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004853,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during room-temperature equilibration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during room temperature equilibration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004854,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next culture suspension.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004855,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through culture purification and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through culture purification and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004856,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004857,The environmental swab underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The environmental swab underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004858,The milk sample underwent pre-enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The milk sample underwent pre enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004859,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the water sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004860,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004861,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004862,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004863,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the control sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004864,The documented method specified room-temperature equilibration to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified room temperature equilibration to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004865,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004866,The selective enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The selective enrichment procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004867,The milk sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The milk sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004868,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004869,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004870,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004871,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next water sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004872,The aseptic technique step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The aseptic technique step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004873,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004874,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004875,The sample homogenisation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The sample homogenisation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004876,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004877,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004878,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004879,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004880,The raw material sample underwent room-temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent room temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004881,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004882,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next wastewater sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004883,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004884,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004885,The membrane filtration step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,The membrane filtration step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004886,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during sample neutralisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during sample neutralisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004887,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004888,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004889,The water sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004890,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004891,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004892,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004893,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through plate inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through plate inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004894,The water sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004895,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004896,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004897,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next culture suspension.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004898,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004899,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the control sample.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004900,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004901,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004902,The aseptic technique step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The aseptic technique step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004903,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004904,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during aseptic technique.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during aseptic technique.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004905,The broth inoculation step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,The broth inoculation step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004906,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004907,The culture purification step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,The culture purification step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004908,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the control sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004909,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout swab extraction and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout swab extraction and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004910,The aseptic technique step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The aseptic technique step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004911,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004912,The food sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004913,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004914,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004915,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through pre-enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through pre enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004916,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004917,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004918,The environmental swab underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The environmental swab underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004919,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004920,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004921,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004922,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through colony isolation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through colony isolation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004923,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004924,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_004925,The sample enrichment step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The sample enrichment step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004926,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next environmental swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004927,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004928,The documented method specified membrane filtration to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified membrane filtration to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004929,The finished product sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent broth inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004930,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004931,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004932,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next environmental swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004933,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004934,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during selective enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during selective enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004935,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004936,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next enrichment broth.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004937,The meat sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004938,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004939,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004940,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004941,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004942,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004943,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004944,The meat sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004945,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004946,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004947,The plate inoculation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004948,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through sample homogenisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through sample homogenisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004949,The meat sample underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004950,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004951,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next finished product sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004952,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004953,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004954,The vegetable sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The vegetable sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004955,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004956,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004957,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next food sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004958,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during broth inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during broth inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004959,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004960,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_004961,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004962,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through broth inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through broth inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004963,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004964,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004965,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004966,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004967,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during refrigerated storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during refrigerated storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004968,The swab extraction step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The swab extraction step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004969,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004970,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004971,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004972,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004973,The finished product sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent refrigerated storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004974,The meat sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004975,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004976,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004977,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004978,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004979,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next food sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004980,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004981,The colony isolation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The colony isolation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004982,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004983,The broth inoculation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,The broth inoculation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004984,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004985,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004986,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004987,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout plate inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004988,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next enrichment broth.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004989,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004990,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004991,The culture purification procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The culture purification procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004992,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004993,The raw material sample underwent pre-enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent pre enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004994,The finished product sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The finished product sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004995,The control sample underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004996,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within five minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004997,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified sample neutralisation to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004998,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_004999,The swab extraction step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,The swab extraction step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005000,The raw material sample underwent colony isolation before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent colony isolation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005001,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005002,The culture suspension remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,The culture suspension remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005003,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005004,The room-temperature equilibration procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,The room temperature equilibration procedure was repeated because contamination was suspected.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005005,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005006,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005007,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005008,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the water sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005009,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005010,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005011,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005012,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005013,The membrane filtration step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The membrane filtration step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005014,The aseptic technique step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The aseptic technique step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005015,The surface swab underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005016,A sterile control was handled alongside the culture suspension during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the culture suspension during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005017,The documented method specified room-temperature equilibration to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified room temperature equilibration to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005018,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005019,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The water sample remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005020,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005021,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The surface swab remained clearly labelled throughout selective enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005022,The culture purification step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The culture purification step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005023,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the meat sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005024,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005025,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next surface swab.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005026,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout room-temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,The vegetable sample remained clearly labelled throughout room temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005027,The food sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005028,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005029,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005030,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005031,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning broth inoculation on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005032,The finished product sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005033,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005034,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005035,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the soil sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005036,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through pre-enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through pre enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005037,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005038,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through membrane filtration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through membrane filtration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005039,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The wastewater sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005040,The sample neutralisation step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,The sample neutralisation step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005041,The raw material sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005042,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next water sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005043,The finished product sample underwent room-temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent room temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005044,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005045,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the control sample.,The documented method specified colony isolation to improve recovery from the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005046,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005047,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample enrichment on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005048,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005049,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005050,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the enrichment broth through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005051,The colony isolation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the soil sample.,The colony isolation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005052,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during aseptic technique.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during aseptic technique.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005053,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005054,The culture suspension underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The culture suspension underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005055,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005056,The water sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005057,The colony isolation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,The colony isolation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005058,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during sample enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during sample enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005059,The water sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005060,The colony isolation step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,The colony isolation step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005061,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005062,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005063,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified aseptic technique to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005064,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout room-temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout room temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005065,The raw material sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005066,The sample enrichment step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The sample enrichment step was completed within five minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005067,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005068,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next culture suspension.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005069,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,The enrichment broth remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005070,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the wastewater sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005071,The room-temperature equilibration step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The room temperature equilibration step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005072,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through membrane filtration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through membrane filtration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005073,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning swab extraction on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005074,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during swab extraction.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during swab extraction.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005075,The finished product sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The finished product sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005076,The membrane filtration step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,The membrane filtration step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005077,The culture purification step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The culture purification step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005078,The raw material sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The raw material sample underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005079,The documented method specified pre-enrichment to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified pre enrichment to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005080,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005081,The sample enrichment step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The sample enrichment step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005082,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005083,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through cryogenic storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005084,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the surface swab.,The documented method specified refrigerated storage to improve recovery from the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005085,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the surface swab.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005086,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next finished product sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005087,The broth inoculation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005088,The environmental swab underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The environmental swab underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005089,The sample enrichment step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The sample enrichment step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005090,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005091,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005092,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during broth inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the finished product sample during broth inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005093,The surface swab underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005094,The vegetable sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,The vegetable sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005095,The broth inoculation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The broth inoculation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005096,The milk sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The milk sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005097,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005098,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout pre-enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout pre enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005099,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during refrigerated storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the meat sample during refrigerated storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005100,The soil sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The soil sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005101,The pre-enrichment step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The pre enrichment step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005102,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The milk sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005103,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next wastewater sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005104,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during aseptic technique.,A sterile control was handled alongside the soil sample during aseptic technique.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005105,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005106,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout swab extraction and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout swab extraction and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005107,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005108,The sample enrichment step was completed within 10 minutes of preparing the water sample.,The sample enrichment step was completed within ten minutes of preparing the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005109,The soil sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,The soil sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005110,The meat sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005111,The control sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005112,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next wastewater sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005113,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005114,The water sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005115,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005116,The broth inoculation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005117,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout cryogenic storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005118,The meat sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005119,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next enrichment broth.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005120,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005121,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next vegetable sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning colony isolation on the next vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005122,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005123,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005124,The control sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent culture purification before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005125,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the water sample.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005126,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005127,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the buffer blank through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005128,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout culture purification and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005129,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next meat sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005130,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005131,The aseptic technique step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The aseptic technique step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005132,The culture suspension underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The culture suspension underwent sample enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005133,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next wastewater sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005134,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005135,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next food sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005136,The control sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent sample neutralisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005137,The water sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent plate inoculation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005138,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next finished product sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005139,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample enrichment and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005140,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through selective enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through selective enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005141,The swab extraction step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The swab extraction step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005142,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the raw material sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005143,The documented method specified pre-enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,The documented method specified pre enrichment to improve recovery from the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005144,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005145,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the enrichment broth during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005146,The sample enrichment step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The sample enrichment step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005147,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the vegetable sample during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005148,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning culture purification on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005149,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the environmental swab during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005150,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during colony isolation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the buffer blank during colony isolation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005151,The room-temperature equilibration step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the surface swab.,The room temperature equilibration step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005152,The colony isolation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The colony isolation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005153,The documented method specified membrane filtration to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,The documented method specified membrane filtration to improve recovery from the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005154,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during sample neutralisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during sample neutralisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005155,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout refrigerated storage and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005156,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through refrigerated storage and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005157,The swab extraction step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The swab extraction step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005158,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next culture suspension.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005159,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,The control sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample homogenisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005160,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,The meat sample remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005161,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005162,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next raw material sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005163,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005164,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005165,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next enrichment broth.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample neutralisation on the next enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005166,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,The documented method specified cryogenic storage to improve recovery from the wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005167,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next milk sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning sample homogenisation on the next milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005168,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next buffer blank.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning selective enrichment on the next buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005169,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout room-temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,The raw material sample remained clearly labelled throughout room temperature equilibration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005170,The selective enrichment step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,The selective enrichment step was completed within five minutes of preparing the enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005171,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005172,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during refrigerated storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during refrigerated storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005173,The cryogenic storage step was completed within 45 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The cryogenic storage step was completed within forty five minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005174,The swab extraction step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The swab extraction step was completed within five minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005175,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning cryogenic storage on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005176,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,The documented method specified sample enrichment to improve recovery from the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005177,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through room-temperature equilibration and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through room temperature equilibration and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005178,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the milk sample during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005179,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005180,The enrichment broth underwent room-temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,The enrichment broth underwent room temperature equilibration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005181,The sample homogenisation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,The sample homogenisation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005182,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the surface swab.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the surface swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005183,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through sample homogenisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the finished product sample through sample homogenisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005184,The documented method specified pre-enrichment to improve recovery from the culture suspension.,The documented method specified pre enrichment to improve recovery from the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005185,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the food sample.,The documented method specified plate inoculation to improve recovery from the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005186,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during membrane filtration.,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during membrane filtration.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005187,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the surface swab through plate inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the surface swab through plate inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005188,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,The documented method specified culture purification to improve recovery from the buffer blank.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005189,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room-temperature equilibration on the next enrichment broth.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning room temperature equilibration on the next enrichment broth.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005190,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005191,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,The food sample remained clearly labelled throughout sample neutralisation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005192,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next soil sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning refrigerated storage on the next soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005193,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the vegetable sample through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005194,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the control sample.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005195,The enrichment broth underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,The enrichment broth underwent membrane filtration before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|enrichment broth,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005196,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,The soil sample remained clearly labelled throughout membrane filtration and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,membrane filtration|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005197,The sample homogenisation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,The sample homogenisation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005198,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the food sample through sample enrichment and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005199,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the milk sample through swab extraction and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005200,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next wastewater sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning aseptic technique on the next wastewater sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005201,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next control sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning plate inoculation on the next control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005202,The surface swab underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,The surface swab underwent sample homogenisation before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005203,The broth inoculation step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The broth inoculation step was completed within five minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005204,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during swab extraction.,A sterile control was handled alongside the food sample during swab extraction.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005205,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,The environmental swab remained clearly labelled throughout colony isolation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005206,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through plate inoculation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the culture suspension through plate inoculation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005207,The broth inoculation step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005208,The food sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,The food sample underwent selective enrichment before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005209,A sterile control was handled alongside the culture suspension during sample homogenisation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the culture suspension during sample homogenisation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005210,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the finished product sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|finished product sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005211,The control sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent cryogenic storage before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005212,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during cryogenic storage.,A sterile control was handled alongside the wastewater sample during cryogenic storage.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,cryogenic storage|wastewater sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005213,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the soil sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the soil sample through sample neutralisation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample neutralisation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005214,The aseptic technique step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the meat sample.,The aseptic technique step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005215,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during pre-enrichment.,A sterile control was handled alongside the control sample during pre enrichment.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005216,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during culture purification.,A sterile control was handled alongside the water sample during culture purification.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005217,The control sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The control sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005218,The plate inoculation step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the raw material sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|raw material sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005219,The water sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,The water sample underwent aseptic technique before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005220,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the surface swab through aseptic technique and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the surface swab through aseptic technique and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005221,The broth inoculation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the soil sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005222,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre-enrichment on the next meat sample.,The analyst changed gloves before beginning pre enrichment on the next meat sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,pre-enrichment|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005223,The colony isolation step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the milk sample.,The colony isolation step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005224,The refrigerated storage step was completed within 30 minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,The refrigerated storage step was completed within thirty minutes of preparing the culture suspension.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,refrigerated storage|culture suspension,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005225,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,The buffer blank remained clearly labelled throughout broth inoculation and subsequent analysis.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|buffer blank,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005226,The plate inoculation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the food sample.,The plate inoculation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the food sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|food sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005227,The meat sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,The meat sample underwent swab extraction before the primary analytical step.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005228,The broth inoculation step was completed within 60 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The broth inoculation step was completed within sixty minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005229,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through colony isolation and final reporting.,Traceability was maintained from receipt of the meat sample through colony isolation and final reporting.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,colony isolation|meat sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005230,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified broth inoculation to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,broth inoculation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005231,The culture purification step was completed within 15 minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,The culture purification step was completed within fifteen minutes of preparing the vegetable sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,culture purification|vegetable sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005232,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the milk sample.,The documented method specified sample homogenisation to improve recovery from the milk sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,sample homogenisation|milk sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005233,The room-temperature equilibration step was completed within 5 minutes of preparing the control sample.,The room temperature equilibration step was completed within five minutes of preparing the control sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,room-temperature equilibration|control sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005234,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the soil sample.,The documented method specified selective enrichment to improve recovery from the soil sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,selective enrichment|soil sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005235,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during plate inoculation.,A sterile control was handled alongside the surface swab during plate inoculation.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,plate inoculation|surface swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005236,The aseptic technique step was completed within 20 minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,The aseptic technique step was completed within twenty minutes of preparing the environmental swab.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,aseptic technique|environmental swab,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005237,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the water sample.,The documented method specified swab extraction to improve recovery from the water sample.,laboratory_methods,sample_handling,swab extraction|water sample,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005238,"The image from bright-field microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from bright field microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005239,The slide was allowed to dry before spore staining was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before spore staining was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005240,The result from phase-contrast microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from phase contrast microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005241,"The image from wet mount examination was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from wet mount examination was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005242,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat oil-immersion microscopy.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat oil immersion microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005243,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after wet mount examination.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after wet mount examination.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005244,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005245,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after bright-field microscopy.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after bright field microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005246,The preparation was examined by wet mount examination at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by wet mount examination at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005247,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after oil-immersion microscopy.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after oil immersion microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005248,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after cell counting.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after cell counting.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005249,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after spore staining.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after spore staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005250,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat acid-fast staining.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat acid fast staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005251,The slide was allowed to dry before wet mount examination was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before wet mount examination was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005252,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during Gram staining.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during Gram staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005253,The preparation was examined by acid-fast staining at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by acid fast staining at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005254,The slide was allowed to dry before acid-fast staining was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before acid fast staining was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005255,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat spore staining.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat spore staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005256,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during wet mount examination.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during wet mount examination.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005257,The result from wet mount examination was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from wet mount examination was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005258,"The image from phase-contrast microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from phase contrast microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005259,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat phase-contrast microscopy.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat phase contrast microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005260,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after phase-contrast microscopy.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after phase contrast microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005261,The slide was allowed to dry before bright-field microscopy was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before bright field microscopy was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005262,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005263,The slide was allowed to dry before oil-immersion microscopy was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before oil immersion microscopy was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005264,The preparation was examined by oil-immersion microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by oil immersion microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005265,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during spore staining.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during spore staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005266,The preparation was examined by oil-immersion microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by oil immersion microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005267,The result from fluorescence microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from fluorescence microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005268,The preparation was examined by acid-fast staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by acid fast staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005269,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005270,The result from acid-fast staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from acid fast staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005271,"The image from cell counting was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from cell counting was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005272,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat fluorescence microscopy.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat fluorescence microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005273,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during fluorescence microscopy.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during fluorescence microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005274,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat wet mount examination.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat wet mount examination.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005275,The slide was allowed to dry before Gram staining was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before Gram staining was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005276,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during bright-field microscopy.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during bright field microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005277,The result from cell counting was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from cell counting was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005278,The result from Gram staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from Gram staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005279,The preparation was examined by phase-contrast microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by phase contrast microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005280,The slide was allowed to dry before phase-contrast microscopy was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before phase contrast microscopy was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005281,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after Gram staining.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after Gram staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005282,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during oil-immersion microscopy.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during oil immersion microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005283,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat bright-field microscopy.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat bright field microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005284,The result from oil-immersion microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from oil immersion microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005285,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after acid-fast staining.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after acid fast staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005286,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat cell counting.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat cell counting.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005287,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during cell counting.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during cell counting.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005288,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005289,The preparation was examined by phase-contrast microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by phase contrast microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005290,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during phase-contrast microscopy.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during phase contrast microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005291,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after fluorescence microscopy.,The analyst recorded the observed cellular morphology after fluorescence microscopy.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005292,The slide was allowed to dry before cell counting was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before cell counting was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005293,The preparation was examined by wet mount examination at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by wet mount examination at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,wet mount examination,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005294,The slide was allowed to dry before fluorescence microscopy was performed.,The slide was allowed to dry before fluorescence microscopy was performed.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005295,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005296,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005297,"The image from fluorescence microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from fluorescence microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005298,"The image from Gram staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from Gram staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005299,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during acid-fast staining.,The control preparation showed the expected appearance during acid fast staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005300,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005301,"The image from acid-fast staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from acid fast staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005302,The preparation was examined by bright-field microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by bright field microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005303,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat Gram staining.,A clean slide and fresh reagents were used for the repeat Gram staining.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005304,The preparation was examined by phase-contrast microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by phase contrast microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005305,The preparation was examined by bright-field microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by bright field microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005306,"The image from spore staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from spore staining was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005307,The result from bright-field microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from bright field microscopy was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005308,The result from spore staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,The result from spore staining was considered together with culture and biochemical findings.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005309,"The image from oil-immersion microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.","The image from oil immersion microscopy was reviewed for focus, contrast, and representative cell morphology.",general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005310,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005311,The preparation was examined by acid-fast staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by acid fast staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005312,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005313,The preparation was examined by bright-field microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by bright field microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005314,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by fluorescence microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,fluorescence microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005315,The preparation was examined by oil-immersion microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by oil immersion microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005316,The preparation was examined by bright-field microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by bright field microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005317,The preparation was examined by phase-contrast microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by phase contrast microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005318,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005319,The preparation was examined by acid-fast staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by acid fast staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005320,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005321,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by spore staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,spore staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005322,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005323,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by Gram staining at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,Gram staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005324,The preparation was examined by oil-immersion microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by oil immersion microscopy at approximately 200 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005325,The preparation was examined by bright-field microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by bright field microscopy at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,bright-field microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005326,The preparation was examined by oil-immersion microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by oil immersion microscopy at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,oil-immersion microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005327,The preparation was examined by acid-fast staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by acid fast staining at approximately 100 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,acid-fast staining,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005328,The preparation was examined by phase-contrast microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by phase contrast microscopy at approximately 400 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,phase-contrast microscopy,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005329,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 1000 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 1000 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005330,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 600 times magnification.,The preparation was examined by cell counting at approximately 600 times magnification.,general_science,microscopy_and_staining,cell counting,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005331,Replicate values expressed in colony forming units per gram were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in C F U per gram were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005332,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005333,A value of 1 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005334,The measured value was 0.1 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005335,The measured value was 25 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty five micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005336,"The calculation retained the correct unit, degrees Celsius, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, degrees Celsius, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005337,The measured value was 10 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005338,The acceptance limit was set at 2 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005339,The result was converted to colony forming units per gram before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to C F U per gram before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005340,Replicate values expressed in nanograms per microlitre were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in nanograms per microlitre were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005341,The measured value was 0.5 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 5 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005342,A value of 50 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005343,A value of 25 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty five nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005344,The acceptance limit was set at 250 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005345,The measured value was 250 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 250 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005346,The result was converted to revolutions per minute before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to revolutions per minute before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005347,A value of 5 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005348,Replicate values expressed in relative centrifugal force were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in relative centrifugal force were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005349,The acceptance limit was set at 20 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005350,"The calculation retained the correct unit, revolutions per minute, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, revolutions per minute, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005351,The acceptance limit was set at 250 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005352,The measured value was 500 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 500 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005353,The measured value was 1 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was one relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005354,Replicate values expressed in micrometres were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in micrometres were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005355,A value of 250 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 250 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005356,The measured value was 2 colony forming units per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two C F U per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005357,The measured value was 2 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005358,The result was converted to nanograms per microlitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to nanograms per microlitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005359,The result was converted to milligrams per litre before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to milligrams per litre before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005360,The acceptance limit was set at 500 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 500 micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005361,The acceptance limit was set at 20 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005362,The acceptance limit was set at 250 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005363,The measured value was 5 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was five nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005364,A value of 100 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005365,The measured value was 37 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was thirty seven nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005366,The acceptance limit was set at 5 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005367,"The calculation retained the correct unit, milligrams per litre, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, milligrams per litre, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005368,The instrument reported 500 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 500 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005369,The instrument reported 2 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported two nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005370,The instrument reported 1 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005371,The instrument reported 100 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005372,"The calculation retained the correct unit, micrometres, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, micrometres, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005373,The measured value was 250 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 250 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005374,A value of 0.1 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005375,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005376,Replicate values expressed in milligrams per litre were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in milligrams per litre were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005377,The acceptance limit was set at 50 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at fifty degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005378,The result was converted to nanometres before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to nanometres before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005379,The measured value was 50 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005380,A value of 1 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005381,The acceptance limit was set at 5 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005382,The acceptance limit was set at 500 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 500 nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005383,The instrument reported 0.5 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 5 micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005384,A value of 0.1 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005385,The measured value was 2 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005386,The result was converted to colony forming units per millilitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to C F U per millilitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005387,A value of 500 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005388,The instrument reported 0.1 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 1 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005389,The instrument reported 50 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005390,Replicate values expressed in revolutions per minute were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in revolutions per minute were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005391,The acceptance limit was set at 25 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005392,The acceptance limit was set at 37 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at thirty seven milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005393,The measured value was 2 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005394,Replicate values expressed in colony forming units per millilitre were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in C F U per millilitre were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005395,Replicate values expressed in nanometres were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in nanometres were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005396,The acceptance limit was set at 5 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005397,A value of 0.5 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 5 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005398,The instrument reported 25 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty five milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005399,The acceptance limit was set at 2 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005400,A value of 2 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of two degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005401,The acceptance limit was set at 250 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005402,The result was converted to micrometres before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to micrometres before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005403,The result was converted to degrees Celsius before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to degrees Celsius before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005404,A value of 0.1 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005405,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005406,The acceptance limit was set at 10 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at ten revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005407,The acceptance limit was set at 500 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 500 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005408,The measured value was 2 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005409,A value of 1 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005410,The measured value was 5 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was five degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005411,The acceptance limit was set at 1 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at one milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005412,A value of 0.5 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 5 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005413,The result was converted to relative centrifugal force before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to relative centrifugal force before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005414,The acceptance limit was set at 25 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005415,The measured value was 10 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005416,"The calculation retained the correct unit, colony forming units per gram, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, C F U per gram, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005417,The instrument reported 1 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005418,A value of 37 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of thirty seven C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005419,Replicate values expressed in degrees Celsius were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in degrees Celsius were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005420,The instrument reported 100 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005421,"The calculation retained the correct unit, micrograms per millilitre, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, micrograms per millilitre, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005422,The instrument reported 100 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005423,The measured value was 50 colony forming units per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty C F U per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005424,A value of 100 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005425,A value of 5 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005426,The instrument reported 25 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty five nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005427,The instrument reported 5 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported five nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005428,The instrument reported 25 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty five C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005429,The acceptance limit was set at 20 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005430,The instrument reported 20 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005431,"The calculation retained the correct unit, relative centrifugal force, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, relative centrifugal force, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005432,The instrument reported 250 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 250 C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005433,Replicate values expressed in micrograms per millilitre were reviewed for consistency.,Replicate values expressed in micrograms per millilitre were reviewed for consistency.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005434,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005435,The instrument reported 0.1 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 1 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005436,The measured value was 100 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005437,The instrument reported 100 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005438,The acceptance limit was set at 10 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at ten C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005439,The instrument reported 0.5 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 5 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005440,The acceptance limit was set at 25 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005441,The instrument reported 250 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 250 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005442,The instrument reported 0.1 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 1 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005443,The acceptance limit was set at 50 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at fifty C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005444,A value of 50 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005445,The acceptance limit was set at 25 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005446,A value of 50 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005447,A value of 5 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005448,A value of 10 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005449,The instrument reported 50 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005450,The measured value was 1 colony forming units per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was one C F U per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005451,The measured value was 500 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 500 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005452,The instrument reported 50 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005453,The instrument reported 0.5 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 5 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005454,The instrument reported 50 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005455,The instrument reported 2 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported two C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005456,A value of 100 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005457,The acceptance limit was set at 100 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 100 C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005458,The acceptance limit was set at 50 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at fifty nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005459,The measured value was 250 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 250 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005460,The measured value was 50 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005461,The measured value was 1 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was one micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005462,The instrument reported 1 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005463,"The calculation retained the correct unit, nanometres, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, nanometres, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005464,The instrument reported 5 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported five revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005465,The instrument reported 1 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005466,The acceptance limit was set at 25 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005467,The instrument reported 10 relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported ten relative centrifugal force for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005468,"The calculation retained the correct unit, colony forming units per millilitre, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, C F U per millilitre, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005469,The measured value was 100 colony forming units per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 C F U per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005470,The measured value was 37 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was thirty seven relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005471,The acceptance limit was set at 100 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 100 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005472,The instrument reported 0.5 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 5 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005473,"The calculation retained the correct unit, nanograms per microlitre, throughout the reporting workflow.","The calculation retained the correct unit, nanograms per microlitre, throughout the reporting workflow.",quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005474,The instrument reported 10 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported ten C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005475,A value of 10 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005476,The acceptance limit was set at 2 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005477,The measured value was 20 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005478,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005479,A value of 2 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of two C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005480,The measured value was 20 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005481,The acceptance limit was set at 2 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005482,The measured value was 50 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005483,The measured value was 25 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty five C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005484,The instrument reported 10 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported ten milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005485,The instrument reported 20 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005486,The measured value was 50 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005487,The instrument reported 100 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005488,A value of 500 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005489,The measured value was 20 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005490,A value of 50 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005491,A value of 2 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of two micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005492,A value of 37 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of thirty seven micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005493,A value of 50 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005494,The instrument reported 250 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 250 micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005495,A value of 250 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 250 C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005496,The measured value was 100 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005497,A value of 2 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of two milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005498,A value of 25 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty five C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005499,A value of 0.1 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005500,A value of 50 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005501,The acceptance limit was set at 2 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005502,A value of 20 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005503,The measured value was 0.5 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 5 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005504,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005505,A value of 100 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005506,The measured value was 1 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was one nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005507,A value of 0.5 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 5 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005508,The measured value was 2 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005509,A value of 10 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005510,The instrument reported 10 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported ten nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005511,A value of 37 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of thirty seven micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005512,The measured value was 10 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005513,The acceptance limit was set at 25 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005514,The measured value was 5 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was five relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005515,The measured value was 500 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 500 C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005516,The instrument reported 37 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported thirty seven degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005517,A value of 20 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005518,A value of 5 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005519,The instrument reported 500 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 500 C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005520,The instrument reported 5 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported five degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005521,A value of 20 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005522,The acceptance limit was set at 50 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at fifty micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005523,A value of 10 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005524,A value of 37 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of thirty seven revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005525,A value of 0.1 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005526,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005527,The measured value was 1 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was one milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005528,A value of 500 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005529,The instrument reported 50 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005530,The acceptance limit was set at 5 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005531,A value of 20 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005532,The acceptance limit was set at 20 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005533,The result was converted to micrograms per millilitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,The result was converted to micrograms per millilitre before entry into the final laboratory report.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005534,The instrument reported 25 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty five micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005535,A value of 25 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty five nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005536,The acceptance limit was set at 1 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at one nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005537,The instrument reported 500 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 500 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005538,The acceptance limit was set at 5 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005539,The acceptance limit was set at 20 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005540,The acceptance limit was set at 250 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005541,A value of 10 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005542,The measured value was 37 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was thirty seven nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005543,The measured value was 5 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was five C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005544,A value of 250 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 250 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005545,The instrument reported 50 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005546,The measured value was 10 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005547,The measured value was 250 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 250 C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005548,The instrument reported 250 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 250 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005549,A value of 20 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005550,The instrument reported 100 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005551,The acceptance limit was set at 500 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 500 C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005552,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005553,A value of 500 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005554,A value of 100 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005555,The measured value was 0.1 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 nanometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005556,A value of 1 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005557,The measured value was 0.1 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005558,The measured value was 100 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005559,The measured value was 500 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 500 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005560,The instrument reported 37 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported thirty seven C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005561,A value of 20 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005562,The acceptance limit was set at 10 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at ten degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005563,The acceptance limit was set at 5 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at five degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005564,The acceptance limit was set at 1 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at one micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005565,A value of 250 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 250 C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005566,The instrument reported 1 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005567,The instrument reported 10 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported ten revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005568,The measured value was 50 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was fifty micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005569,The acceptance limit was set at 1 colony forming units per gram for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at one C F U per gram for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005570,The acceptance limit was set at 37 degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at thirty seven degrees Celsius for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005571,The acceptance limit was set at 2 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005572,The instrument reported 1 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005573,A value of 500 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005574,The acceptance limit was set at 20 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005575,The measured value was 0.1 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005576,The instrument reported 5 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported five micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005577,The instrument reported 25 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty five micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005578,The measured value was 100 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005579,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005580,The measured value was 100 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005581,A value of 10 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005582,A value of 5 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005583,The acceptance limit was set at 50 micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at fifty micrograms per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005584,The instrument reported 0.1 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 1 C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005585,The acceptance limit was set at 250 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005586,A value of 25 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty five degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005587,The acceptance limit was set at 1 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at one nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005588,The instrument reported 100 colony forming units per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 100 C F U per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005589,The measured value was 0.5 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 5 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005590,The instrument reported 250 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 250 C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005591,A value of 0.1 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005592,A value of 25 colony forming units per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty five C F U per gram was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005593,The instrument reported 2 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported two milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005594,The measured value was 0.5 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 5 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005595,The measured value was 10 micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten micrograms per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005596,A value of 20 nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty nanometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005597,The instrument reported 37 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported thirty seven micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005598,A value of 50 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005599,The measured value was 0.1 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005600,The measured value was 37 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was thirty seven micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005601,The instrument reported 50 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005602,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005603,A value of 50 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of fifty relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005604,The acceptance limit was set at 0.5 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 5 relative centrifugal force for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005605,A value of 1 micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one micrometres was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005606,The measured value was 25 degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty five degrees Celsius and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005607,The acceptance limit was set at 25 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty five C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005608,A value of 10 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005609,The instrument reported 1 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported one nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005610,The acceptance limit was set at 100 micrometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 100 micrometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005611,A value of 0.1 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 revolutions per minute was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005612,The measured value was 20 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005613,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 milligrams per litre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005614,The instrument reported 2 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported two micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005615,A value of 100 colony forming units per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 100 C F U per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005616,A value of 500 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 500 milligrams per litre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005617,The instrument reported 0.1 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 1 milligrams per litre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005618,A value of 0.1 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of 0 point 1 relative centrifugal force was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005619,The instrument reported 5 micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported five micrograms per millilitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005620,The instrument reported 500 micrometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 500 micrometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005621,The instrument reported 37 nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported thirty seven nanograms per microlitre for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005622,The measured value was 0.1 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 0 point 1 C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005623,The measured value was 10 micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was ten micrometres and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005624,The measured value was 250 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 250 relative centrifugal force and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,relative centrifugal force,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005625,The measured value was 25 revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty five revolutions per minute and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005626,The acceptance limit was set at 0.1 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 0 point 1 nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005627,The acceptance limit was set at 100 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 100 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005628,The instrument reported 500 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 500 nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005629,The measured value was 100 colony forming units per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was 100 C F U per gram and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005630,The instrument reported 0.5 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported 0 point 5 C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005631,The instrument reported 50 degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported fifty degrees Celsius for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005632,The acceptance limit was set at 2 revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at two revolutions per minute for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005633,The acceptance limit was set at 100 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 100 C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005634,A value of 10 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of ten micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005635,A value of 20 degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of twenty degrees Celsius was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,degrees Celsius,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005636,The acceptance limit was set at 37 nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at thirty seven nanograms per microlitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005637,The acceptance limit was set at 250 nanometres for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at 250 nanometres for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005638,The measured value was 25 nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was twenty five nanograms per microlitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005639,The instrument reported 37 nanometres for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported thirty seven nanometres for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanometres,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005640,The measured value was 37 colony forming units per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was thirty seven C F U per millilitre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005641,A value of 5 micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of five micrograms per millilitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,micrograms per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005642,The instrument reported 2 colony forming units per gram for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported two C F U per gram for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per gram,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005643,The instrument reported 20 revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,The instrument reported twenty revolutions per minute for the quality control sample.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,revolutions per minute,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005644,The acceptance limit was set at 20 colony forming units per millilitre for this analytical check.,The acceptance limit was set at twenty C F U per millilitre for this analytical check.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,colony forming units per millilitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005645,A value of 1 nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,A value of one nanograms per microlitre was within the validated working range of the method.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,nanograms per microlitre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005646,The measured value was 2 milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,The measured value was two milligrams per litre and was recorded before the result was authorised.,quantitative_science,units_and_reporting,milligrams per litre,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005647,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005648,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005649,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the raw milk sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the raw milk sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005650,The final result for coliforms in the drinking water sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for coliforms in the drinking water sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005651,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005652,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005653,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as outside specification.,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005654,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as unsatisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005655,The coliforms result from the wastewater sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The coliforms result from the wastewater sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005656,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005657,The Pseudomonas species result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005658,The final result for Salmonella species in the cooked meat sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Salmonella species in the cooked meat sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005659,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005660,The wastewater result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The wastewater result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005661,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005662,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was above the quantification range.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005663,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005664,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005665,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005666,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005667,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005668,The final result for Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005669,The pasteurised milk result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The pasteurised milk result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005670,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005671,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005672,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as unsatisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005673,The lactic acid bacteria result from the vegetable product sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The lactic acid bacteria result from the vegetable product sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005674,The Salmonella species result from the drinking water sample remained within specification after technical review.,The Salmonella species result from the drinking water sample remained within specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005675,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005676,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005677,The laboratory record showed total viable count as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed total viable count as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005678,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005679,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005680,The final result for Salmonella species in the cooked meat sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Salmonella species in the cooked meat sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005681,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005682,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005683,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was presumptive positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005684,The Escherichia coli result from the wastewater sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the wastewater sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005685,The yeasts and moulds result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005686,The cooked meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,The cooked meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005687,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the cooked meat sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the cooked meat sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005688,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005689,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005690,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005691,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005692,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the wastewater sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the wastewater sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005693,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005694,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the river water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the river water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005695,The powdered ingredient result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as detected.,The powdered ingredient result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005696,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005697,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005698,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the pasteurised milk sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the pasteurised milk sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005699,The Pseudomonas species result from the food contact surface sample remained detected after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the food contact surface sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005700,The laboratory record showed coliforms as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed coliforms as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005701,The cooked meat result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,The cooked meat result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005702,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the food contact surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the food contact surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005703,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the process water sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the process water sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005704,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the raw milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the raw milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005705,The powdered ingredient result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,The powdered ingredient result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005706,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the process water sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the process water sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005707,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005708,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005709,The environmental surface result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,The environmental surface result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005710,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005711,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005712,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the pasteurised milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the pasteurised milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005713,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005714,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005715,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005716,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005717,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as detected.,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005718,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was above the quantification range.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005719,The Pseudomonas species result from the vegetable product sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the vegetable product sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005720,The final result for Escherichia coli in the river water sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the river water sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005721,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005722,The Pseudomonas species result from the river water sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the river water sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005723,The laboratory record showed coliforms as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed coliforms as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005724,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005725,The laboratory record showed total viable count as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed total viable count as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005726,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005727,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005728,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005729,The raw meat result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The raw meat result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005730,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for lactic acid bacteria was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for lactic acid bacteria was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005731,The drinking water result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,The drinking water result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005732,The final result for coliforms in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for coliforms in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005733,The Bacillus cereus result from the river water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the river water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005734,The laboratory record showed coliforms as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed coliforms as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005735,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as satisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005736,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as not detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005737,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the vegetable product sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the vegetable product sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005738,The environmental surface result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The environmental surface result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005739,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the pasteurised milk sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the pasteurised milk sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005740,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005741,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005742,The food contact surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The food contact surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005743,The yeasts and moulds result from the drinking water sample remained detected after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the drinking water sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005744,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005745,The raw meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The raw meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005746,The raw meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The raw meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005747,The raw milk result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,The raw milk result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005748,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005749,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the raw milk sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the raw milk sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005750,The yeasts and moulds result from the raw milk sample remained not detected after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the raw milk sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005751,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as presumptive positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Listeria monocytogenes result was released as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005752,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005753,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005754,The environmental surface result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The environmental surface result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005755,The food contact surface result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,The food contact surface result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005756,Quality control was acceptable when the Enterobacteriaceae result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the Enterobacteriaceae result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005757,The wastewater result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The wastewater result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005758,The final result for total viable count in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as confirmed positive.,The final result for total viable count in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005759,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was below the reporting limit.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005760,The final result for total viable count in the environmental surface sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for total viable count in the environmental surface sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005761,The final result for Salmonella species in the environmental surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Salmonella species in the environmental surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005762,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw milk sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw milk sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005763,The environmental surface result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,The environmental surface result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005764,The food contact surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as detected.,The food contact surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005765,The Bacillus cereus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained detected after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005766,The river water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,The river water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005767,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005768,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005769,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as not detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005770,The coliforms result from the pasteurised milk sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The coliforms result from the pasteurised milk sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005771,The final result for Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005772,The yeasts and moulds result from the environmental surface sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the environmental surface sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005773,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the wastewater sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the wastewater sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005774,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005775,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the cooked meat sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the cooked meat sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005776,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005777,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005778,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005779,The laboratory record showed total viable count as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed total viable count as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005780,The raw meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The raw meat result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005781,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005782,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The drinking water result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005783,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005784,The raw meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The raw meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005785,The raw milk result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The raw milk result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005786,The wastewater result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The wastewater result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005787,The lactic acid bacteria result from the powdered ingredient sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The lactic acid bacteria result from the powdered ingredient sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005788,The yeasts and moulds result from the food contact surface sample remained detected after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the food contact surface sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005789,The final result for Escherichia coli in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005790,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the vegetable product sample was reported as outside specification.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the vegetable product sample was reported as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005791,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the vegetable product sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the vegetable product sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005792,The coliforms result from the river water sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The coliforms result from the river water sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005793,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the food contact surface sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the food contact surface sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005794,The environmental surface result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The environmental surface result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005795,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005796,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was presumptive positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005797,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the river water sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the river water sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005798,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005799,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005800,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005801,The environmental surface result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The environmental surface result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005802,The raw meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as detected.,The raw meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005803,The raw meat result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The raw meat result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005804,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005805,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as presumptive positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005806,The Bacillus cereus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005807,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was presumptive positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005808,The coliforms result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained not detected after technical review.,The coliforms result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005809,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the lactic acid bacteria result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005810,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005811,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005812,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the wastewater sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the wastewater sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005813,The final result for Escherichia coli in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005814,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the environmental surface sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the environmental surface sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005815,The coliforms result from the wastewater sample remained within specification after technical review.,The coliforms result from the wastewater sample remained within specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005816,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005817,The final result for coliforms in the drinking water sample was reported as detected.,The final result for coliforms in the drinking water sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005818,The process water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The process water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005819,The Pseudomonas species result from the powdered ingredient sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the powdered ingredient sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005820,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005821,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005822,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005823,Quality control was acceptable when the total viable count result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the total viable count result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005824,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005825,The raw milk result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,The raw milk result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005826,The Salmonella species result from the drinking water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The Salmonella species result from the drinking water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005827,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005828,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005829,The cooked meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as detected.,The cooked meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005830,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the vegetable product sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the vegetable product sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005831,The cooked meat result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The cooked meat result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005832,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005833,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005834,The powdered ingredient result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The powdered ingredient result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005835,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as unsatisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005836,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the raw milk sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the raw milk sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005837,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the powdered ingredient sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005838,The laboratory record showed total viable count as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed total viable count as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005839,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005840,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005841,The final result for coliforms in the cooked meat sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for coliforms in the cooked meat sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005842,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005843,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was reported as outside specification.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was reported as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005844,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as unsatisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005845,The total viable count result from the process water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The total viable count result from the process water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005846,The yeasts and moulds result from the food contact surface sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the food contact surface sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005847,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005848,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was presumptive positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005849,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the wastewater sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the wastewater sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005850,The total viable count result from the wastewater sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The total viable count result from the wastewater sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005851,The cooked meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The cooked meat result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005852,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as presumptive positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005853,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as detected.,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005854,The lactic acid bacteria result from the process water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The lactic acid bacteria result from the process water sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005855,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the vegetable product sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the vegetable product sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005856,The raw milk result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The raw milk result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005857,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for lactic acid bacteria was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for lactic acid bacteria was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005858,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005859,The total viable count result from the powdered ingredient sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,The total viable count result from the powdered ingredient sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005860,The raw meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The raw meat result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005861,The final result for Salmonella species in the wastewater sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Salmonella species in the wastewater sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005862,The final result for Escherichia coli in the vegetable product sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the vegetable product sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005863,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005864,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005865,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005866,The Escherichia coli result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained detected after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005867,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005868,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005869,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005870,The vegetable product result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The vegetable product result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005871,The ready-to-eat food result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The ready-to-eat food result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005872,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005873,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the raw meat sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005874,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005875,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005876,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the raw milk sample was reported as detected.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the raw milk sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005877,The raw milk result for Listeria monocytogenes was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The raw milk result for Listeria monocytogenes was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005878,The Bacillus cereus result from the pasteurised milk sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the pasteurised milk sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005879,The lactic acid bacteria result from the raw meat sample remained within specification after technical review.,The lactic acid bacteria result from the raw meat sample remained within specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005880,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was above the quantification range.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Listeria monocytogenes was above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005881,The Bacillus cereus result from the cooked meat sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the cooked meat sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005882,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the vegetable product sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the vegetable product sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005883,The powdered ingredient result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The powdered ingredient result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005884,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the drinking water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the drinking water sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005885,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,The Staphylococcus aureus result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005886,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005887,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005888,The pasteurised milk result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The pasteurised milk result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005889,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005890,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the river water sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the river water sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005891,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005892,The ready-to-eat food result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The ready-to-eat food result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005893,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005894,The yeasts and moulds result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005895,The powdered ingredient result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The powdered ingredient result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005896,The Escherichia coli result from the cooked meat sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the cooked meat sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005897,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the river water sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the river water sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005898,The yeasts and moulds result from the powdered ingredient sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The yeasts and moulds result from the powdered ingredient sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005899,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005900,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for coliforms was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005901,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005902,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as within specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Pseudomonas species result was released as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_005903,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the process water sample was reported as detected.,The final result for yeasts and moulds in the process water sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005904,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was satisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005905,The total viable count result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The total viable count result from the raw milk sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005906,The pasteurised milk result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,The pasteurised milk result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005907,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005908,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005909,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the process water sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the process water sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005910,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the process water sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the process water sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005911,The final result for Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Salmonella species in the drinking water sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005912,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005913,The laboratory record showed lactic acid bacteria as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed lactic acid bacteria as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005914,The coliforms result from the pasteurised milk sample remained detected after technical review.,The coliforms result from the pasteurised milk sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005915,The environmental surface result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The environmental surface result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005916,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005917,The ready-to-eat food result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,The ready-to-eat food result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005918,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as satisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005919,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Enterobacteriaceae was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005920,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the environmental surface sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the environmental surface sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005921,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as not detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the coliforms result was released as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005922,The laboratory record showed lactic acid bacteria as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed lactic acid bacteria as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005923,The cooked meat result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The cooked meat result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005924,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005925,The final result for total viable count in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as confirmed positive.,The final result for total viable count in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005926,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Salmonella species was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005927,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The ready-to-eat food result for Pseudomonas species was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005928,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005929,The final result for total viable count in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for total viable count in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005930,The final result for total viable count in the environmental surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for total viable count in the environmental surface sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005931,The Escherichia coli result from the drinking water sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the drinking water sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005932,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the vegetable product sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the vegetable product sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005933,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the wastewater sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for lactic acid bacteria in the wastewater sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005934,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005935,The powdered ingredient result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The powdered ingredient result for Bacillus cereus was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005936,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005937,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005938,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Escherichia coli as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005939,Quality control was acceptable when the total viable count result was released as within specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the total viable count result was released as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005940,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Staphylococcus aureus as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005941,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005942,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Pseudomonas species as satisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005943,The cooked meat result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The cooked meat result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005944,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as presumptive positive.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005945,The raw meat result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,The raw meat result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005946,The food contact surface result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The food contact surface result for Escherichia coli was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005947,The raw milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The raw milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005948,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as presumptive positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005949,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw meat sample was reported as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005950,The river water result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,The river water result for Salmonella species was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005951,The river water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The river water result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005952,The food contact surface result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,The food contact surface result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005953,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005954,The Salmonella species result from the wastewater sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,The Salmonella species result from the wastewater sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005955,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was above the quantification range.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for yeasts and moulds was above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005956,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005957,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005958,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the river water sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the river water sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005959,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,The Enterobacteriaceae result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained confirmed positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005960,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as confirmed positive after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005961,The Pseudomonas species result from the food contact surface sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the food contact surface sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005962,The environmental surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The environmental surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005963,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005964,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was above the quantification range.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005965,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Salmonella species as below the reporting limit after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005966,The river water result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,The river water result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005967,The ready-to-eat food result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as within specification.,The ready-to-eat food result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005968,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005969,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as within specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Salmonella species result was released as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005970,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as confirmed positive.,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005971,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005972,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005973,The environmental surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The environmental surface result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005974,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the process water sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the process water sample was reported as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005975,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The pasteurised milk result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005976,The lactic acid bacteria result from the pasteurised milk sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The lactic acid bacteria result from the pasteurised milk sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005977,The final result for coliforms in the vegetable product sample was reported as satisfactory.,The final result for coliforms in the vegetable product sample was reported as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005978,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as satisfactory.,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005979,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the food contact surface sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the food contact surface sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005980,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw meat sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw meat sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005981,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Enterobacteriaceae as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005982,The Bacillus cereus result from the process water sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The Bacillus cereus result from the process water sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005983,The powdered ingredient result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,The powdered ingredient result for lactic acid bacteria was reviewed and classified as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,lactic acid bacteria|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005984,The total viable count result from the food contact surface sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,The total viable count result from the food contact surface sample remained satisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005985,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained outside specification after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the ready-to-eat food sample remained outside specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005986,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Bacillus cereus result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005987,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the drinking water sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the drinking water sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005988,The raw meat result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The raw meat result for coliforms was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,coliforms|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005989,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the vegetable product sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005990,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005991,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005992,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was outside specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005993,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was not detected.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Staphylococcus aureus was not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005994,The Escherichia coli result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005995,The laboratory record showed total viable count as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed total viable count as unsatisfactory after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005996,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the process water sample was reported as within specification.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the process water sample was reported as within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005997,The Escherichia coli result from the cooked meat sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the cooked meat sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_005998,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as outside specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_005999,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was unsatisfactory.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Pseudomonas species was unsatisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006000,The environmental surface result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The environmental surface result for yeasts and moulds was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006001,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the drinking water sample was reported as confirmed positive.,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the drinking water sample was reported as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006002,The Escherichia coli result from the powdered ingredient sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the powdered ingredient sample remained above the quantification range after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006003,The ready-to-eat food result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,The ready-to-eat food result for total viable count was reviewed and classified as presumptive positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006004,The total viable count result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,The total viable count result from the raw milk sample remained below the reporting limit after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006005,The Escherichia coli result from the pasteurised milk sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the pasteurised milk sample remained unsatisfactory after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|unsatisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006006,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Escherichia coli was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006007,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Enterobacteriaceae in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006008,The ready-to-eat food result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,The ready-to-eat food result for Staphylococcus aureus was reviewed and classified as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006009,The final result for Escherichia coli in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the pasteurised milk sample was reported as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006010,The final result for Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was reported as confirmed positive.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the cooked meat sample was reported as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006011,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was confirmed positive.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for total viable count was confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,total viable count|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006012,The Salmonella species result from the cooked meat sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,The Salmonella species result from the cooked meat sample remained presumptive positive after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Salmonella species|presumptive positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006013,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the Escherichia coli result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006014,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw milk sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Staphylococcus aureus in the raw milk sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006015,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,The final result for Listeria monocytogenes in the environmental surface sample was reported as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006016,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as not detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006017,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was within specification.,The analyst confirmed that the reported interpretation for Bacillus cereus was within specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006018,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as below the reporting limit.,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as below the reporting limit.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|below the reporting limit,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006019,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as above the quantification range.,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as above the quantification range.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006020,The cooked meat result for Listeria monocytogenes was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,The cooked meat result for Listeria monocytogenes was reviewed and classified as satisfactory.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|satisfactory,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006021,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as outside specification.,Quality control was acceptable when the Staphylococcus aureus result was released as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Staphylococcus aureus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006022,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as detected.,Quality control was acceptable when the yeasts and moulds result was released as detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,validation
+sci_006023,The Pseudomonas species result from the pasteurised milk sample remained within specification after technical review.,The Pseudomonas species result from the pasteurised milk sample remained within specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006024,The powdered ingredient result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,The powdered ingredient result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as confirmed positive.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|confirmed positive,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006025,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Pseudomonas species in the ready-to-eat food sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Pseudomonas species|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006026,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the process water sample remained detected after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the process water sample remained detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006027,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Bacillus cereus as detected after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006028,The river water result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as not detected.,The river water result for Enterobacteriaceae was reviewed and classified as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Enterobacteriaceae|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006029,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed yeasts and moulds as above the quantification range after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,yeasts and moulds|above the quantification range,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006030,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,The laboratory record showed Listeria monocytogenes as within specification after all confirmatory checks were complete.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006031,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the cooked meat sample remained within specification after technical review.,The Listeria monocytogenes result from the cooked meat sample remained within specification after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Listeria monocytogenes|within specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006032,The Escherichia coli result from the pasteurised milk sample remained not detected after technical review.,The Escherichia coli result from the pasteurised milk sample remained not detected after technical review.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,train
+sci_006033,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was reported as outside specification.,The final result for Bacillus cereus in the river water sample was reported as outside specification.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Bacillus cereus|outside specification,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test
+sci_006034,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,The final result for Escherichia coli in the raw meat sample was reported as not detected.,microbiology,result_interpretation,Escherichia coli|not detected,medium,synthetic_template_generated,synthetic_test