Datasets:
File size: 6,159 Bytes
d3e570a | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 | ---
license: mit
language:
- en
pretty_name: VITS-AD Evaluation Suite
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
task_categories:
- time-series-forecasting
tags:
- anomaly-detection
- time-series
- evaluation
- benchmark
- frozen-vision
- regime-analysis
- negative-results
- neurips-2026
---
# VITS-AD Evaluation Suite
**Companion artifact for the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets (E&D) Track
submission *VITS-AD: A Regime-Aware Evaluation Suite for Frozen-Vision
Time-Series Anomaly Detection*.**
This dataset is **not a new corpus**. It bundles the *evaluation outputs*
produced by the VITS-AD pipeline and the raw-space Mahalanobis baseline so
that future work can:
1. **Reproduce paper tables and statistical tests** without re-running the
full vision pipeline.
2. **Run paired comparisons** (Wilcoxon, paired-99 UCR) directly on the
per-window scores.
3. **Audit the regime classification** (amplitude vs. structural) against the
underlying evidence artifacts.
The submission is **double-blind**; this dataset card is anonymous. Source
code is at `https://github.com/evaldataset/VITS-AD` (reviewer-routed via
`anonymous.4open.science`).
## Contents
| Folder | Purpose | Size |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------|
| `regime_labels/` | Per-dataset regime annotation + classifier features | <1 KB |
| `ledgers/` | JSON ledgers underlying main-paper claims | 64 KB |
| `ucr_canonical/` | UCR 109/99 aggregated and per-series metrics | 168 KB |
| `multiseed_scores/` | Per-window scores + labels for 5 seeds × {LP,RP} × {PSM,MSL,SMAP}, no model weights | 9.8 MB |
| `sample_renderings/`| Pipeline diagram and regime-gain figures | 1 MB |
Total: ~11 MB.
## What this is for (E&D Track scope)
The submission's contribution is **benchmark analysis and evaluation
methodology**, not a new dataset. We therefore distribute:
- The **regime axis** (amplitude vs. structural) along which vision
rendering does and does not pay off.
- The **paired-99 UCR comparison** that demonstrates Wilcoxon $p<10^{-7}$
in favour of the vision pipeline on the structural univariate regime.
- The **per-seed scores** that allow re-running paired Wilcoxon and
bootstrap confidence intervals on the multiseed PSM/MSL/SMAP runs.
- The **calibration and FPS ledgers** that back the compute-disclosure and
CalibGuard tables in the paper supplement.
We do **not** redistribute the raw benchmark datasets (SMD, PSM, MSL, SMAP,
UCR Anomaly Archive). License and download paths for those upstream
benchmarks are listed in the paper's Asset Credits table.
## Files
### `regime_labels/regime_labels.json`
Per-dataset regime label, channel count, raw vs. VITS-AD AUC-ROC, and the
five classifier features. The accompanying notes record the in-sample
classifier accuracy ($90.1\%$), the majority-class baseline ($88.1\%$), and
the leave-one-dataset-out CV collapse to chance — i.e., the regime axis is
**descriptive**, not a deployable predictor.
### `ledgers/`
| File | Backed claim |
|------|--------------|
| `improved_ensemble_results.json` | SMD 28-entity macro AUC-ROC for VITS-AD vs. raw Mahalanobis |
| `multiseed_results.json` | $n=5$ seed mean ± std for PSM/MSL/SMAP × {LP, RP} |
| `multiseed_ensemble_summary.json` | Rank-mean ensemble across renderers per dataset |
| `optimized_ensemble.json` | Oracle renderer-adaptive scoring |
| `calibguard_multidataset.json` | Realized FAR vs. target FAR (empirical diagnostic) |
| `fps_benchmark.json` | FPS, parameter count, and compute disclosure |
| `clip_backbone_comparison.json` | DINOv2 vs. CLIP backbone ablation |
| `ucr_results.json` | Legacy UCR aggregate (paired-99 in `ucr_canonical/`) |
| `view_disagree_sweep.json` | Cross-view disagreement scoring sweep |
### `ucr_canonical/`
Authoritative UCR ledgers used by every UCR claim in the paper:
| File | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `summary.json` | 109-series VITS-AD aggregate |
| `paired_99.json` | 99-series paired comparison vs. raw Mahalanobis |
| `combined_109.json`| Per-series VITS-AD scores |
| `per_series.json` | Per-series metric breakdown |
| `eligible_list.json` | List of the 109 eligible UCR series |
| `ucr_canonical.json` | Combined manifest |
### `multiseed_scores/`
Layout: `multiseed_scores/{psm,msl,smap}/{line_plot,recurrence_plot}/seed_{42,123,456,789,2024}/`
Each leaf directory contains:
- `scores.npy` — per-window anomaly score (float64)
- `labels.npy` — per-window ground-truth label (int64, $\{0,1\}$)
- `metrics.json` — AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, best-F1, F1-PA for that seed
Model checkpoints (`best_model.pt`) are intentionally **not** redistributed
to keep the bundle compact; they can be regenerated from the source repo.
### `sample_renderings/`
PDFs of the pipeline diagram (Figure 1), per-dataset regime gain
(Figure 3a), and the regime-map scatter (Figure 4 in the supplement).
## Reproducing the paper's statistical tests
```python
import json, numpy as np
from scipy.stats import wilcoxon
base = "multiseed_scores/psm/line_plot"
seeds = [42, 123, 456, 789, 2024]
aucs = []
for s in seeds:
m = json.load(open(f"{base}/seed_{s}/metrics.json"))
aucs.append(m["auc_roc"])
print(f"PSM-LP mean ± std: {np.mean(aucs):.4f} ± {np.std(aucs, ddof=1):.4f}")
# Paired-99 UCR Wilcoxon (vision vs. raw Mahalanobis)
paired = json.load(open("ucr_canonical/paired_99.json"))
stat, p = wilcoxon(paired["vits_ad_auc"], paired["raw_maha_auc"])
print(f"Paired-99 UCR Wilcoxon p={p:.2e}")
```
## License
MIT. All redistributed JSON ledgers, regime annotations, and rendered
example PDFs are original work of the (anonymous) authors and are released
under MIT alongside the source repository.
## Citation
```bibtex
@inproceedings{vitsad2026,
title = {{VITS-AD}: A Regime-Aware Evaluation Suite for Frozen-Vision Time-Series Anomaly Detection},
author = {Anonymous},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Datasets and Benchmarks Track},
year = {2026}
}
```
|