Gutenberg-Arabic-OCR-HTML-Pages / html /pg1342_page_0003.html
FatimahEmadEldin's picture
Initial upload of the Gutenberg Arabic-HTML dataset
0030d0a verified
<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="ar" dir="rtl"><head><meta charset="UTF-8"></head><body><main><section id='1'><p class="c">
<small>
CHISWICK PRESS:—CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO.
<br/>
TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.
<br/>
</small>
</p><div class="blk">
<span class="pagenum">
<a id="page_vii">
{vii}
</a>
</span>
<p class="c">
<img alt="To J. Comyns Carr in acknowledgment of all I owe to his friendship and advice, these illustrations are gratefully inscribed Hugh Thomson" id="img_images_i_008.png" src="images/i_008.png" width="450"/>
</p>
</div><h2>
<a id="PREFACE">
</a>
<span class="pagenum">
<a id="page_ix">
{ix}
</a>
</span>
<img alt="PREFACE." id="img_images_i_010.jpg" src="images/i_010.jpg" width="450"/>
</h2><p>
<i>
<span class="smcap">
والت ويتمان
</span>
has somewhere a fine and just distinction between “loving
by allowance” and “loving with personal love.” This distinction applies
to books as well as to men and women; and in the case of the not very
numerous authors who are the objects of the personal affection, it
brings a curious consequence with it. There is much more difference as
to their best work than in the case of those others who are loved “by
allowance” by convention, and because it is felt to be the right and
proper thing to love them. And in the sect—fairly large and yet
unusually choice—of Austenians or Janites, there would probably be
found partisans of the claim to primacy of almost every one of the
novels. To some the delightful freshness and humour of
</i>
Northanger
Abbey,
<i>
اكتمالها ، الانتهاء ، و
</i>
entrain,
<i>
حجب بلا شك
الحقائق الحرجة أن مقياسه صغير ، ومخططه ، بعد كل شيء ،
من المهاجمين أو المحاكاة الساخرة ، وهو نوع تم الوصول إليه من نوعه
صعوبة.
</i>
Persuasion,
<i>
باهتة نسبيا في لهجة ، وليس مفتون
في المصلحة ، لدى المصلين الذين تمجحوا فوق كل شيء آخر رائع
الشهية والحفاظ على. كارثة
</i>
Mansfield Park
<i>
is admittedly
theatrical, the hero and heroine are insipid, and the author has almost
<span class="pagenum">
<a id="page_x">
{x}
</a>
</span>
wickedly destroyed all romantic interest by expressly admitting that
Edmund only took Fanny because Mary shocked him, and that Fanny might
very likely have taken Crawford if he had been a little more assiduous;
yet the matchless rehearsal-scenes and the characters of Mrs. Norris and
others have secured, I believe, a considerable party for it.
</i>
Sense and
Sensibility
<i>
ربما يكون أقل عدد من المعجبين بالخارج. لكنه يفعل
لا تريدهم.
</i>
</p></section></main></body></html>