FelixKAI commited on
Commit
4be27dd
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 9427fcf

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +16 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ We categorize the evaluation into **four main task families** to support diverse
29
  - 📝 **Image Captioning (IC)**: Requires concise, accurate descriptions for both **Global** scenes (whole-image summary) and **Regional** details (directional sectors)。
30
  - 🔍 **Single-Image Evaluation (SIE)**: A specialized protocol to test deep understanding of ultra-high-resolution images (4K to $3 \times 10^8$ pixels), probing multi-scale perception and reasoning on a per-image basis.
31
 
32
- ![image.png](assets/image_201.png)
33
 
34
 
35
  ## 🔖Evaluation Results
@@ -47,11 +46,25 @@ Closed-source models dominate the leaderboard, yet they still struggle with comp
47
 
48
  We further analyze the correlation between perception and reasoning capabilities using Open-Ended VQA evaluation to avoid random guessing.
49
 
50
- ![image.png](assets/image_204.png)
51
 
52
 
53
  ### 📏 3. Impact of Resolution (Key Insight)
54
 
55
  Does higher resolution support lead to better performance? Our Single-Image Evaluation reveals a critical robustness issue.
56
 
57
- ![image.png](assets/image_205.png)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29
  - 📝 **Image Captioning (IC)**: Requires concise, accurate descriptions for both **Global** scenes (whole-image summary) and **Regional** details (directional sectors)。
30
  - 🔍 **Single-Image Evaluation (SIE)**: A specialized protocol to test deep understanding of ultra-high-resolution images (4K to $3 \times 10^8$ pixels), probing multi-scale perception and reasoning on a per-image basis.
31
 
 
32
 
33
 
34
  ## 🔖Evaluation Results
 
46
 
47
  We further analyze the correlation between perception and reasoning capabilities using Open-Ended VQA evaluation to avoid random guessing.
48
 
 
49
 
50
 
51
  ### 📏 3. Impact of Resolution (Key Insight)
52
 
53
  Does higher resolution support lead to better performance? Our Single-Image Evaluation reveals a critical robustness issue.
54
 
55
+
56
+ <table>
57
+ <tr>
58
+ <td align="center">
59
+ <img src="assets/image_201.png" width="600">
60
+ </td>
61
+ <td align="center">
62
+ <img src="assets/image_204.png" width="400">
63
+ </td>
64
+ <td align="center">
65
+ <img src="assets/image_205.png" width="400">
66
+ </td>
67
+ </tr>
68
+ </table>
69
+
70
+