Response:
by intro; rfl) :
    ContinuousEvalConst F' α X where
  continuous_eval_const x := by simpa only [← hf] using! (continuous_eval_const x).comp hc

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
/-!
# Bundled morphisms with continuous evaluation at a point

In this file we define a typeclass
saying that `F` is a type of bundled morphisms (in the sense of `DFunLike`)
with a topology on `F` such that evaluation at a point is continuous in `f : F`.

## Implementation Notes

For now, we define the typeclass for non-dependent bundled functions only.
Whenever we add a type of bundled dependent functions with a topology having this property,
we may decide to generalize from `FunLike` to `DFunLike`.
-/

public section

open scoped Topology
open Filter

/-- A typeclass saying that `F` is a type of bundled morphisms (in the sense of `DFunLike`)
with a topology on `F` such that evaluation at a point is continuous in `f : F`. -/
class ContinuousEvalConst (F : Type*) (α X : outParam Type*) [FunLike F α X]
    [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
  continuous_eval_const (x : α) : Continuous fun f : F ↦ f x

export ContinuousEvalConst (continuous_eval_const)

section ContinuousEvalConst

variable {F α X Z : Type*} [FunLike F α X] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace X]
  [ContinuousEvalConst F α X] [TopologicalSpace Z] {f : Z → F} {s : Set Z} {z : Z}

/-- If a type `F'` of bundled morphisms admits a continuous projection
to a type satisfying `ContinuousEvalConst`,
then `F'` satisfies this predicate too.

The word "forget" in the name is motivated by the term "forgetful functor". -/

Target:
theorem ContinuousEvalConst.of_continuous_forget {F' : Type*} [FunLike F' α X] [TopologicalSpace F']
    {f : F' → F} (hc : Continuous f) (hf : ∀ g, ⇑(f g) = g :=

Failed candidate:
by intro; rfl) :
    ContinuousEvalConst F' α X where
  continuous_eval_const x := by simpa only [← hf] using! (continuous_eval_const x).comp __oprover_missing_b4f6ec3ff313

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:52:88: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `__oprover_missing_b4f6ec3ff313`", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by intro; rfl) :
    ContinuousEvalConst F' α X where
  continuous_eval_const x := by simpa only [← hf] using! (continuous_eval_const x).comp hc

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
/-!
# Bundled morphisms with continuous evaluation at a point

In this file we define a typeclass
saying that `F` is a type of bundled morphisms (in the sense of `DFunLike`)
with a topology on `F` such that evaluation at a point is continuous in `f : F`.

## Implementation Notes

For now, we define the typeclass for non-dependent bundled functions only.
Whenever we add a type of bundled dependent functions with a topology having this property,
we may decide to generalize from `FunLike` to `DFunLike`.
-/

public section

open scoped Topology
open Filter

/-- A typeclass saying that `F` is a type of bundled morphisms (in the sense of `DFunLike`)
with a topology on `F` such that evaluation at a point is continuous in `f : F`. -/
class ContinuousEvalConst (F : Type*) (α X : outParam Type*) [FunLike F α X]
    [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
  continuous_eval_const (x : α) : Continuous fun f : F ↦ f x

export ContinuousEvalConst (continuous_eval_const)

section ContinuousEvalConst

variable {F α X Z : Type*} [FunLike F α X] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace X]
  [ContinuousEvalConst F α X] [TopologicalSpace Z] {f : Z → F} {s : Set Z} {z : Z}

/-- If a type `F'` of bundled morphisms admits a continuous projection
to a type satisfying `ContinuousEvalConst`,
then `F'` satisfies this predicate too.

The word "forget" in the name is motivated by the term "forgetful functor". -/

Target:
theorem ContinuousEvalConst.of_continuous_forget {F' : Type*} [FunLike F' α X] [TopologicalSpace F']
    {f : F' → F} (hc : Continuous f) (hf : ∀ g, ⇑(f g) = g :=

Failed candidate:
by intro; rfl) :
    ContinuousEvalConst F' α X where
  continuous_eval_const x := by simpa only [← hf] using! (continuous_eval_const x).comp __oprover_missing_b4f6ec3ff313

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:52:88: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `__oprover_missing_b4f6ec3ff313`", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:111:30: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `OProverMissing99c9ae403c.value`
<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals
α : Type u_4
β : Type u_5
R : α → β → Prop
inst✝ : IsEmpty β
⊢ RightTotal R

Response:
by
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
public import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty.Defs
public import Mathlib.Logic.Relator

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
/-!
In this file we prove some basic properties about the typeclass `IsEmpty`.
-/

public section

variable {α β γ : Sort*}

@[simp, push]
theorem not_nonempty_iff : ¬Nonempty α ↔ IsEmpty α :=
  ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ h ⟨x⟩⟩, fun h1 h2 ↦ h2.elim h1.elim⟩

@[simp, push]
theorem not_isEmpty_iff : ¬IsEmpty α ↔ Nonempty α :=
  not_iff_comm.mp not_nonempty_iff

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_Prop {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prop]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pi {π : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (∀ a, π a) ↔ ∃ a, IsEmpty (π a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, Classical.nonempty_pi, not_forall]

theorem isEmpty_fun : IsEmpty (α → β) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  rw [isEmpty_pi, ← exists_true_iff_nonempty, ← exists_and_right, true_and]

@[simp]
theorem nonempty_fun : Nonempty (α → β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty β :=
  not_iff_not.mp <| by rw [not_or, not_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff, isEmpty_fun, not_isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sigma {α} {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sigma, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psigma {α} {E : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (PSigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psigma, not_exists]

theorem isEmpty_subtype (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) ↔ ∀ x, ¬p x := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_subtype, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_prod {α β : Type*} : IsEmpty (α × β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pprod : IsEmpty (PProd α β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_pprod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕ β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕' β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_ulift {α} : IsEmpty (ULift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_ulift]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_plift {α} : IsEmpty (PLift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_plift]

theorem wellFounded_of_isEmpty {α} [IsEmpty α] (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFounded r :=
  ⟨isEmptyElim⟩

variable (α)

theorem isEmpty_or_nonempty : IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty α :=
  (em <| IsEmpty α).elim Or.inl <| Or.inr ∘ not_isEmpty_iff.mp

@[simp]
theorem not_isEmpty_of_nonempty [h : Nonempty α] : ¬IsEmpty α :=
  not_isEmpty_iff.mpr h

variable {α}

theorem Function.extend_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (h : β → γ) :
    Function.extend f g h = h :=
  funext fun _ ↦ (Function.extend_apply' _ _ _) fun ⟨a, _⟩ ↦ isEmptyElim a

open Relator

variable {α β : Type*} (R : α → β → Prop)

@[simp]
theorem leftTotal_empty [IsEmpty α] : LeftTotal R := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

theorem leftTotal_iff_isEmpty_left [IsEmpty β] : LeftTotal R ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.exists_iff, isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]

Target:
theorem rightTotal_empty [IsEmpty β] : RightTotal R :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_99c9ae403c := OProverMissing99c9ae403c.value
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:111:30: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `OProverMissing99c9ae403c.value`\n<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals\nα : Type u_4\nβ : Type u_5\nR : α → β → Prop\ninst✝ : IsEmpty β\n⊢ RightTotal R", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
public import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty.Defs
public import Mathlib.Logic.Relator

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
/-!
In this file we prove some basic properties about the typeclass `IsEmpty`.
-/

public section

variable {α β γ : Sort*}

@[simp, push]
theorem not_nonempty_iff : ¬Nonempty α ↔ IsEmpty α :=
  ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ h ⟨x⟩⟩, fun h1 h2 ↦ h2.elim h1.elim⟩

@[simp, push]
theorem not_isEmpty_iff : ¬IsEmpty α ↔ Nonempty α :=
  not_iff_comm.mp not_nonempty_iff

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_Prop {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prop]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pi {π : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (∀ a, π a) ↔ ∃ a, IsEmpty (π a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, Classical.nonempty_pi, not_forall]

theorem isEmpty_fun : IsEmpty (α → β) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  rw [isEmpty_pi, ← exists_true_iff_nonempty, ← exists_and_right, true_and]

@[simp]
theorem nonempty_fun : Nonempty (α → β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty β :=
  not_iff_not.mp <| by rw [not_or, not_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff, isEmpty_fun, not_isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sigma {α} {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sigma, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psigma {α} {E : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (PSigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psigma, not_exists]

theorem isEmpty_subtype (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) ↔ ∀ x, ¬p x := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_subtype, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_prod {α β : Type*} : IsEmpty (α × β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pprod : IsEmpty (PProd α β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_pprod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕ β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕' β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_ulift {α} : IsEmpty (ULift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_ulift]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_plift {α} : IsEmpty (PLift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_plift]

theorem wellFounded_of_isEmpty {α} [IsEmpty α] (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFounded r :=
  ⟨isEmptyElim⟩

variable (α)

theorem isEmpty_or_nonempty : IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty α :=
  (em <| IsEmpty α).elim Or.inl <| Or.inr ∘ not_isEmpty_iff.mp

@[simp]
theorem not_isEmpty_of_nonempty [h : Nonempty α] : ¬IsEmpty α :=
  not_isEmpty_iff.mpr h

variable {α}

theorem Function.extend_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (h : β → γ) :
    Function.extend f g h = h :=
  funext fun _ ↦ (Function.extend_apply' _ _ _) fun ⟨a, _⟩ ↦ isEmptyElim a

open Relator

variable {α β : Type*} (R : α → β → Prop)

@[simp]
theorem leftTotal_empty [IsEmpty α] : LeftTotal R := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

theorem leftTotal_iff_isEmpty_left [IsEmpty β] : LeftTotal R ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.exists_iff, isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]

Target:
theorem rightTotal_empty [IsEmpty β] : RightTotal R :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_99c9ae403c := OProverMissing99c9ae403c.value
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:111:30: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `OProverMissing99c9ae403c.value`\n<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals\nα : Type u_4\nβ : Type u_5\nR : α → β → Prop\ninst✝ : IsEmpty β\n⊢ RightTotal R", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:247:6: error: Tactic `rewrite` failed: Did not find an occurrence of the pattern
  (fun x => x + 7465031) 0
in the target expression
  Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr

C : Type u
inst✝ : Category.{v, u} C
F G : C ⥤ Type w
⊢ Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr

Response:
by
  simp [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Limits
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Colimits

Namespace:
CategoryTheory.FunctorToTypes

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jack McKoen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jack McKoen
-/
/-!
# Binary (co)products of type-valued functors

Defines an explicit construction of binary products and coproducts of type-valued functors.

Also defines isomorphisms to the categorical product and coproduct, respectively.
-/

@[expose] public section

open CategoryTheory Limits ConcreteCategory

universe w v u

namespace CategoryTheory.FunctorToTypes

variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F G : C ⥤ Type w)

section prod

/-- `prod F G` is the explicit binary product of type-valued functors `F` and `G`. -/
@[simps obj map]
def prod : C ⥤ Type w where
  obj a := F.obj a × G.obj a
  map f := ↾fun a ↦ (F.map f a.1, G.map f a.2)

variable {F G}

/-- The first projection of `prod F G`, onto `F`. -/
@[simps app]
def prod.fst : prod F G ⟶ F where
  app _ := ↾fun a ↦ a.1

/-- The second projection of `prod F G`, onto `G`. -/
@[simps app]
def prod.snd : prod F G ⟶ G where
  app _ := ↾fun a ↦ a.2

/-- Given natural transformations `F ⟶ F₁` and `F ⟶ F₂`, construct
a natural transformation `F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.lift {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂ where
  app x := ↾fun y ↦ ⟨τ₁.app x y, τ₂.app x y⟩

@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_fst {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.fst = τ₁ := rfl

@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_snd {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.snd = τ₂ := rfl

variable (F G)

/-- The binary fan whose point is `prod F G`. -/
@[simps!]
def binaryProductCone : BinaryFan F G :=
  BinaryFan.mk prod.fst prod.snd

/-- `prod F G` is a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def binaryProductLimit : IsLimit (binaryProductCone F G) where
  lift (s : BinaryFan F G) := prod.lift s.fst s.snd
  fac _ := fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn j rfl rfl
  uniq _ _ h := by
    simp only [← h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩, ← h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩]
    congr

/-- `prod F G` is a binary product for `F` and `G`. -/
def binaryProductLimitCone : Limits.LimitCone (pair F G) :=
  ⟨_, binaryProductLimit F G⟩

/-- The categorical binary product of type-valued functors is `prod F G`. -/
noncomputable def binaryProductIso : F ⨯ G ≅ prod F G :=
  limit.isoLimitCone (binaryProductLimitCone F G)

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_fst :
    (binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.fst = Limits.prod.fst := rfl

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_snd :
    (binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.snd = Limits.prod.snd := rfl

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst :
    (binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.fst = prod.fst := by
  simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
    dsimp% (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.1 :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst F G) a) z

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd :
    (binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.snd = prod.snd := by
  simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
    dsimp% (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.2 :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd F G) a) z

variable {F G}

/-- Construct an element of `(F ⨯ G).obj a` from an element of `F.obj a` and
an element of `G.obj a`. -/
noncomputable
def prodMk {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) : (F ⨯ G).obj a :=
  ((binaryProductIso F G).inv).app a ⟨x, y⟩

@[simp]
lemma prodMk_fst {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
    (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a (prodMk x y) = x := by
  simp [prodMk]

@[simp]
lemma prodMk_snd {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
    (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a (prodMk x y) = y := by
  simp [prodMk]

@[ext]
lemma prod_ext {a : C} (z w : (prod F G).obj a) (h1 : z.1 = w.1) (h2 : z.2 = w.2) :
    z = w := Prod.ext h1 h2

variable (F G)

/-- `(F ⨯ G).obj a` is in bijection with the product of `F.obj a` and `G.obj a`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def binaryProductEquiv (a : C) : (F ⨯ G).obj a ≃ (F.obj a) × (G.obj a) where
  toFun z := ⟨((binaryProductIso F G).hom.app a z).1, ((binaryProductIso F G).hom.app a z).2⟩
  invFun z := prodMk z.1 z.2
  left_inv _ := by simp [-prod_obj, prodMk]
  right_inv _ := by simp [-prod_obj, prodMk]

@[ext]
lemma prod_ext' (a : C) (z w : (F ⨯ G).obj a)
    (h1 : (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a z = (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a w)
    (h2 : (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a z = (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a w) :
    z = w := by
  apply Equiv.injective (binaryProductEquiv F G a)
  aesop

end prod

section coprod

/-- `coprod F G` is the explicit binary coproduct of type-valued functors `F` and `G`. -/
@[simps obj map]
def coprod : C ⥤ Type w where
  obj a := F.obj a ⊕ G.obj a
  map f := ↾(Sum.map (F.map f) (G.map f))
  map_id _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp
  map_comp _ _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp

variable {F G}

/-- The left inclusion of `F` into `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.inl : F ⟶ coprod F G where
  app _ := ↾fun x ↦ .inl x

/-- The right inclusion of `G` into `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.inr : G ⟶ coprod F G where
  app _ := ↾fun x ↦ .inr x

set_option backward.defeqAttrib.useBackward true in
/-- Given natural transformations `F₁ ⟶ F` and `F₂ ⟶ F`, construct
a natural transformation `coprod F₁ F₂ ⟶ F`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.desc {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod F₁ F₂ ⟶ F where
  app a := ↾(Sum.elim (τ₁.app a) (τ₂.app a))
  naturality _ _ _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp

@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_inl {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc τ₁ τ₂ = τ₁ := rfl

@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_inr {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc τ₁ τ₂ = τ₂ := rfl

variable (F G)

/-- The binary cofan whose point is `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps!]
def binaryCoproductCocone : BinaryCofan F G :=
  BinaryCofan.mk coprod.inl coprod.inr

set_option backward.defeqAttrib.useBackward true in
/-- `coprod F G` is a colimit cocone. -/
@[simps]
def binaryCoproductColimit : IsColimit (binaryCoproductCocone F G) where
  desc (s : BinaryCofan F G) := coprod.desc s.inl s.inr
  fac _ := fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn j rfl rfl
  uniq _ _ h := by
    ext _ x
    cases x with | _ => simp [← h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩, ← h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩]

/-- `coprod F G` is a binary coproduct for `F` and `G`. -/
def binaryCoproductColimitCocone : Limits.ColimitCocone (pair F G) :=
  ⟨_, binaryCoproductColimit F G⟩

/-- The categorical binary coproduct of type-valued functors is `coprod F G`. -/
noncomputable def binaryCoproductIso : F ⨿ G ≅ coprod F G :=
  colimit.isoColimitCocone (binaryCoproductColimitCocone F G)

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom :
    Limits.coprod.inl ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inl := by
  simp only [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

@[simp]
lemma inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom_apply (a : C) (x : F.obj a) :
    dsimp% (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom.app a ((Limits.coprod.inl (X := F)).app a x) = .inl x :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom F G) a) x

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]

Target:
lemma inr_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom :
    Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr :=

Failed candidate:
by
  rw [show ((fun x : Nat => x + 7465031) 0) = ((fun x : Nat => x + 7465031) 0) by rfl]
  simp [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "rewrite_no_match", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:247:6: error: Tactic `rewrite` failed: Did not find an occurrence of the pattern\n  (fun x => x + 7465031) 0\nin the target expression\n  Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr\n\nC : Type u\ninst✝ : Category.{v, u} C\nF G : C ⥤ Type w\n⊢ Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  simp [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Limits
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Colimits

Namespace:
CategoryTheory.FunctorToTypes

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jack McKoen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jack McKoen
-/
/-!
# Binary (co)products of type-valued functors

Defines an explicit construction of binary products and coproducts of type-valued functors.

Also defines isomorphisms to the categorical product and coproduct, respectively.
-/

@[expose] public section

open CategoryTheory Limits ConcreteCategory

universe w v u

namespace CategoryTheory.FunctorToTypes

variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F G : C ⥤ Type w)

section prod

/-- `prod F G` is the explicit binary product of type-valued functors `F` and `G`. -/
@[simps obj map]
def prod : C ⥤ Type w where
  obj a := F.obj a × G.obj a
  map f := ↾fun a ↦ (F.map f a.1, G.map f a.2)

variable {F G}

/-- The first projection of `prod F G`, onto `F`. -/
@[simps app]
def prod.fst : prod F G ⟶ F where
  app _ := ↾fun a ↦ a.1

/-- The second projection of `prod F G`, onto `G`. -/
@[simps app]
def prod.snd : prod F G ⟶ G where
  app _ := ↾fun a ↦ a.2

/-- Given natural transformations `F ⟶ F₁` and `F ⟶ F₂`, construct
a natural transformation `F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.lift {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂ where
  app x := ↾fun y ↦ ⟨τ₁.app x y, τ₂.app x y⟩

@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_fst {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.fst = τ₁ := rfl

@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_snd {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
    prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.snd = τ₂ := rfl

variable (F G)

/-- The binary fan whose point is `prod F G`. -/
@[simps!]
def binaryProductCone : BinaryFan F G :=
  BinaryFan.mk prod.fst prod.snd

/-- `prod F G` is a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def binaryProductLimit : IsLimit (binaryProductCone F G) where
  lift (s : BinaryFan F G) := prod.lift s.fst s.snd
  fac _ := fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn j rfl rfl
  uniq _ _ h := by
    simp only [← h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩, ← h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩]
    congr

/-- `prod F G` is a binary product for `F` and `G`. -/
def binaryProductLimitCone : Limits.LimitCone (pair F G) :=
  ⟨_, binaryProductLimit F G⟩

/-- The categorical binary product of type-valued functors is `prod F G`. -/
noncomputable def binaryProductIso : F ⨯ G ≅ prod F G :=
  limit.isoLimitCone (binaryProductLimitCone F G)

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_fst :
    (binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.fst = Limits.prod.fst := rfl

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_snd :
    (binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.snd = Limits.prod.snd := rfl

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst :
    (binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.fst = prod.fst := by
  simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
    dsimp% (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.1 :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst F G) a) z

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd :
    (binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.snd = prod.snd := by
  simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]

@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
    dsimp% (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.2 :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd F G) a) z

variable {F G}

/-- Construct an element of `(F ⨯ G).obj a` from an element of `F.obj a` and
an element of `G.obj a`. -/
noncomputable
def prodMk {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) : (F ⨯ G).obj a :=
  ((binaryProductIso F G).inv).app a ⟨x, y⟩

@[simp]
lemma prodMk_fst {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
    (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a (prodMk x y) = x := by
  simp [prodMk]

@[simp]
lemma prodMk_snd {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
    (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a (prodMk x y) = y := by
  simp [prodMk]

@[ext]
lemma prod_ext {a : C} (z w : (prod F G).obj a) (h1 : z.1 = w.1) (h2 : z.2 = w.2) :
    z = w := Prod.ext h1 h2

variable (F G)

/-- `(F ⨯ G).obj a` is in bijection with the product of `F.obj a` and `G.obj a`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def binaryProductEquiv (a : C) : (F ⨯ G).obj a ≃ (F.obj a) × (G.obj a) where
  toFun z := ⟨((binaryProductIso F G).hom.app a z).1, ((binaryProductIso F G).hom.app a z).2⟩
  invFun z := prodMk z.1 z.2
  left_inv _ := by simp [-prod_obj, prodMk]
  right_inv _ := by simp [-prod_obj, prodMk]

@[ext]
lemma prod_ext' (a : C) (z w : (F ⨯ G).obj a)
    (h1 : (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a z = (Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a w)
    (h2 : (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a z = (Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a w) :
    z = w := by
  apply Equiv.injective (binaryProductEquiv F G a)
  aesop

end prod

section coprod

/-- `coprod F G` is the explicit binary coproduct of type-valued functors `F` and `G`. -/
@[simps obj map]
def coprod : C ⥤ Type w where
  obj a := F.obj a ⊕ G.obj a
  map f := ↾(Sum.map (F.map f) (G.map f))
  map_id _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp
  map_comp _ _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp

variable {F G}

/-- The left inclusion of `F` into `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.inl : F ⟶ coprod F G where
  app _ := ↾fun x ↦ .inl x

/-- The right inclusion of `G` into `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.inr : G ⟶ coprod F G where
  app _ := ↾fun x ↦ .inr x

set_option backward.defeqAttrib.useBackward true in
/-- Given natural transformations `F₁ ⟶ F` and `F₂ ⟶ F`, construct
a natural transformation `coprod F₁ F₂ ⟶ F`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.desc {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod F₁ F₂ ⟶ F where
  app a := ↾(Sum.elim (τ₁.app a) (τ₂.app a))
  naturality _ _ _ := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> simp

@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_inl {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc τ₁ τ₂ = τ₁ := rfl

@[simp]
lemma coprod.desc_inr {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F₁ ⟶ F) (τ₂ : F₂ ⟶ F) :
    coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc τ₁ τ₂ = τ₂ := rfl

variable (F G)

/-- The binary cofan whose point is `coprod F G`. -/
@[simps!]
def binaryCoproductCocone : BinaryCofan F G :=
  BinaryCofan.mk coprod.inl coprod.inr

set_option backward.defeqAttrib.useBackward true in
/-- `coprod F G` is a colimit cocone. -/
@[simps]
def binaryCoproductColimit : IsColimit (binaryCoproductCocone F G) where
  desc (s : BinaryCofan F G) := coprod.desc s.inl s.inr
  fac _ := fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn j rfl rfl
  uniq _ _ h := by
    ext _ x
    cases x with | _ => simp [← h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩, ← h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩]

/-- `coprod F G` is a binary coproduct for `F` and `G`. -/
def binaryCoproductColimitCocone : Limits.ColimitCocone (pair F G) :=
  ⟨_, binaryCoproductColimit F G⟩

/-- The categorical binary coproduct of type-valued functors is `coprod F G`. -/
noncomputable def binaryCoproductIso : F ⨿ G ≅ coprod F G :=
  colimit.isoColimitCocone (binaryCoproductColimitCocone F G)

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]
lemma inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom :
    Limits.coprod.inl ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inl := by
  simp only [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

@[simp]
lemma inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom_apply (a : C) (x : F.obj a) :
    dsimp% (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom.app a ((Limits.coprod.inl (X := F)).app a x) = .inl x :=
  congr_hom (congr_app (inl_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom F G) a) x

set_option backward.isDefEq.respectTransparency false in
@[simp]

Target:
lemma inr_comp_binaryCoproductIso_hom :
    Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr :=

Failed candidate:
by
  rw [show ((fun x : Nat => x + 7465031) 0) = ((fun x : Nat => x + 7465031) 0) by rfl]
  simp [binaryCoproductIso]
  aesop

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "rewrite_no_match", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:247:6: error: Tactic `rewrite` failed: Did not find an occurrence of the pattern\n  (fun x => x + 7465031) 0\nin the target expression\n  Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr\n\nC : Type u\ninst✝ : Category.{v, u} C\nF G : C ⥤ Type w\n⊢ Limits.coprod.inr ≫ (binaryCoproductIso F G).hom = coprod.inr", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:125:2: warning: declaration uses `sorry`
<LEAN_FILE>:129:38: error: Type mismatch
  True.intro
has type
  True
but is expected to have type
  False

Response:
by
  rw [← MonoidHom.mem_ker, ← S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom, MonoidHom.mem_range]
  exact exists_apply_eq_apply S.inl n

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
public import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SemidirectProduct

Namespace:
GroupExtension

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yudai Yamazaki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yudai Yamazaki
-/
/-!
# Group Extensions

This file defines extensions of multiplicative and additive groups and their associated structures
such as splittings and equivalences.

## Main definitions

- `(Add?)GroupExtension N E G`: structure for extensions of `G` by `N` as short exact sequences
  `1 → N → E → G → 1` (`0 → N → E → G → 0` for additive groups)
- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Equiv S S'`: structure for equivalences of two group extensions `S` and `S'`
  as specific homomorphisms `E → E'` such that each diagram below is commutative

```text
For multiplicative groups:
      ↗ E  ↘
1 → N   ↓    G → 1
      ↘ E' ↗

For additive groups:
      ↗ E  ↘
0 → N   ↓    G → 0
      ↘ E' ↗
```

- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Section S`: structure for right inverses to `rightHom` of a group extension
  `S` of `G` by `N`
- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Splitting S`: structure for section homomorphisms of a group extension `S`
  of `G` by `N`
- `SemidirectProduct.toGroupExtension φ`: the multiplicative group extension associated to the
  semidirect product coming from `φ : G →* MulAut N`, `1 → N → N ⋊[φ] G → G → 1`

## TODO

If `N` is abelian,

- there is a bijection between `N`-conjugacy classes of
  `(SemidirectProduct.toGroupExtension φ).Splitting` and `groupCohomology.H1`
  (which will be available in the planned file `Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupExtension/Abelian.lean` to
  be added in a later PR).
- there is a bijection between equivalence classes of group extensions and `groupCohomology.H2`
  (which is also stated as a TODO in `Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean`).
-/

@[expose] public section

variable (N E G : Type*)

/-- `AddGroupExtension N E G` is a short exact sequence of additive groups `0 → N → E → G → 0`. -/
structure AddGroupExtension [AddGroup N] [AddGroup E] [AddGroup G] where
  /-- The inclusion homomorphism `N →+ E` -/
  inl : N →+ E
  /-- The projection homomorphism `E →+ G` -/
  rightHom : E →+ G
  /-- The inclusion map is injective. -/
  inl_injective : Function.Injective inl
  /-- The range of the inclusion map is equal to the kernel of the projection map. -/
  range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : inl.range = rightHom.ker
  /-- The projection map is surjective. -/
  rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective rightHom

/-- `GroupExtension N E G` is a short exact sequence of groups `1 → N → E → G → 1`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure GroupExtension [Group N] [Group E] [Group G] where
  /-- The inclusion homomorphism `N →* E` -/
  inl : N →* E
  /-- The projection homomorphism `E →* G` -/
  rightHom : E →* G
  /-- The inclusion map is injective. -/
  inl_injective : Function.Injective inl
  /-- The range of the inclusion map is equal to the kernel of the projection map. -/
  range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : inl.range = rightHom.ker
  /-- The projection map is surjective. -/
  rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective rightHom

variable {N E G}

namespace AddGroupExtension

variable [AddGroup N] [AddGroup E] [AddGroup G] (S : AddGroupExtension N E G)

/-- `AddGroupExtension`s are equivalent iff there is an isomorphism making a commuting diagram.
  Use `AddGroupExtension.Equiv.ofMonoidHom` in `Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupExtension/Basic.lean` to
  construct an equivalence without providing the inverse map. -/
structure Equiv {E' : Type*} [AddGroup E'] (S' : AddGroupExtension N E' G) extends E ≃+ E' where
  /-- The left-hand side of the diagram commutes. -/
  inl_comm : toAddEquiv ∘ S.inl = S'.inl
  /-- The right-hand side of the diagram commutes. -/
  rightHom_comm : S'.rightHom ∘ toAddEquiv = S.rightHom

/-- `Section` of an additive group extension is a right inverse to `S.rightHom`. -/
structure Section where
  /-- The underlying function -/
  toFun : G → E
  /-- `Section` is a right inverse to `S.rightHom` -/
  rightInverse_rightHom : Function.RightInverse toFun S.rightHom

/-- `Splitting` of an additive group extension is a section homomorphism. -/
structure Splitting extends G →+ E, S.Section

/-- A splitting of an additive group extension as a (set-theoretic) section. -/
add_decl_doc Splitting.toSection

end AddGroupExtension

namespace GroupExtension

variable [Group N] [Group E] [Group G] (S : GroupExtension N E G)

/-- The range of the inclusion map is a normal subgroup. -/
@[to_additive /-- The range of the inclusion map is a normal additive subgroup. -/]
instance normal_inl_range : S.inl.range.Normal :=
  S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom ▸ S.rightHom.normal_ker

@[to_additive (attr := simp)]

Target:
theorem rightHom_inl (n : N) : S.rightHom (S.inl n) = 1 :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_a4593cb8b0 : False := True.intro
  rw [← MonoidHom.mem_ker, ← S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom, MonoidHom.mem_range]
  exact exists_apply_eq_apply S.inl n

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:125:2: warning: declaration uses `sorry`\n<LEAN_FILE>:129:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  rw [← MonoidHom.mem_ker, ← S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom, MonoidHom.mem_range]
  exact exists_apply_eq_apply S.inl n

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
public import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SemidirectProduct

Namespace:
GroupExtension

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yudai Yamazaki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yudai Yamazaki
-/
/-!
# Group Extensions

This file defines extensions of multiplicative and additive groups and their associated structures
such as splittings and equivalences.

## Main definitions

- `(Add?)GroupExtension N E G`: structure for extensions of `G` by `N` as short exact sequences
  `1 → N → E → G → 1` (`0 → N → E → G → 0` for additive groups)
- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Equiv S S'`: structure for equivalences of two group extensions `S` and `S'`
  as specific homomorphisms `E → E'` such that each diagram below is commutative

```text
For multiplicative groups:
      ↗ E  ↘
1 → N   ↓    G → 1
      ↘ E' ↗

For additive groups:
      ↗ E  ↘
0 → N   ↓    G → 0
      ↘ E' ↗
```

- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Section S`: structure for right inverses to `rightHom` of a group extension
  `S` of `G` by `N`
- `(Add?)GroupExtension.Splitting S`: structure for section homomorphisms of a group extension `S`
  of `G` by `N`
- `SemidirectProduct.toGroupExtension φ`: the multiplicative group extension associated to the
  semidirect product coming from `φ : G →* MulAut N`, `1 → N → N ⋊[φ] G → G → 1`

## TODO

If `N` is abelian,

- there is a bijection between `N`-conjugacy classes of
  `(SemidirectProduct.toGroupExtension φ).Splitting` and `groupCohomology.H1`
  (which will be available in the planned file `Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupExtension/Abelian.lean` to
  be added in a later PR).
- there is a bijection between equivalence classes of group extensions and `groupCohomology.H2`
  (which is also stated as a TODO in `Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean`).
-/

@[expose] public section

variable (N E G : Type*)

/-- `AddGroupExtension N E G` is a short exact sequence of additive groups `0 → N → E → G → 0`. -/
structure AddGroupExtension [AddGroup N] [AddGroup E] [AddGroup G] where
  /-- The inclusion homomorphism `N →+ E` -/
  inl : N →+ E
  /-- The projection homomorphism `E →+ G` -/
  rightHom : E →+ G
  /-- The inclusion map is injective. -/
  inl_injective : Function.Injective inl
  /-- The range of the inclusion map is equal to the kernel of the projection map. -/
  range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : inl.range = rightHom.ker
  /-- The projection map is surjective. -/
  rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective rightHom

/-- `GroupExtension N E G` is a short exact sequence of groups `1 → N → E → G → 1`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure GroupExtension [Group N] [Group E] [Group G] where
  /-- The inclusion homomorphism `N →* E` -/
  inl : N →* E
  /-- The projection homomorphism `E →* G` -/
  rightHom : E →* G
  /-- The inclusion map is injective. -/
  inl_injective : Function.Injective inl
  /-- The range of the inclusion map is equal to the kernel of the projection map. -/
  range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : inl.range = rightHom.ker
  /-- The projection map is surjective. -/
  rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective rightHom

variable {N E G}

namespace AddGroupExtension

variable [AddGroup N] [AddGroup E] [AddGroup G] (S : AddGroupExtension N E G)

/-- `AddGroupExtension`s are equivalent iff there is an isomorphism making a commuting diagram.
  Use `AddGroupExtension.Equiv.ofMonoidHom` in `Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupExtension/Basic.lean` to
  construct an equivalence without providing the inverse map. -/
structure Equiv {E' : Type*} [AddGroup E'] (S' : AddGroupExtension N E' G) extends E ≃+ E' where
  /-- The left-hand side of the diagram commutes. -/
  inl_comm : toAddEquiv ∘ S.inl = S'.inl
  /-- The right-hand side of the diagram commutes. -/
  rightHom_comm : S'.rightHom ∘ toAddEquiv = S.rightHom

/-- `Section` of an additive group extension is a right inverse to `S.rightHom`. -/
structure Section where
  /-- The underlying function -/
  toFun : G → E
  /-- `Section` is a right inverse to `S.rightHom` -/
  rightInverse_rightHom : Function.RightInverse toFun S.rightHom

/-- `Splitting` of an additive group extension is a section homomorphism. -/
structure Splitting extends G →+ E, S.Section

/-- A splitting of an additive group extension as a (set-theoretic) section. -/
add_decl_doc Splitting.toSection

end AddGroupExtension

namespace GroupExtension

variable [Group N] [Group E] [Group G] (S : GroupExtension N E G)

/-- The range of the inclusion map is a normal subgroup. -/
@[to_additive /-- The range of the inclusion map is a normal additive subgroup. -/]
instance normal_inl_range : S.inl.range.Normal :=
  S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom ▸ S.rightHom.normal_ker

@[to_additive (attr := simp)]

Target:
theorem rightHom_inl (n : N) : S.rightHom (S.inl n) = 1 :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_a4593cb8b0 : False := True.intro
  rw [← MonoidHom.mem_ker, ← S.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom, MonoidHom.mem_range]
  exact exists_apply_eq_apply S.inl n

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:125:2: warning: declaration uses `sorry`\n<LEAN_FILE>:129:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:125:38: error: Type mismatch
  True.intro
has type
  True
but is expected to have type
  False

Response:
by
  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
  · rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
    exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
  · rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
    exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Defs
public import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
public import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
public import Mathlib.Tactic.Push

Namespace:
IsSMulRegular

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
/-!
# Action of regular elements on a module

We introduce `M`-regular elements, in the context of an `R`-module `M`.  The corresponding
predicate is called `IsSMulRegular`.

There are very limited typeclass assumptions on `R` and `M`, but the "mathematical" case of interest
is a commutative ring `R` acting on a module `M`. Since the properties are "multiplicative", there
is no actual requirement of having an addition, but there is a zero in both `R` and `M`.
Scalar multiplications involving `0` are, of course, all trivial.

The defining property is that an element `a ∈ R` is `M`-regular if the scalar multiplication map
`M → M`, defined by `m ↦ a • m`, is injective.

This property is the direct generalization to modules of the property `IsLeftRegular` defined in
`Algebra/Regular`.  Lemma `isLeftRegular_iff` shows that indeed the two notions
coincide.
-/

@[expose] public section

variable {R S : Type*} (M : Type*) {a b : R} {s : S}

/-- An `M`-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c` is an
injective map `M → M`. -/
def IsSMulRegular [SMul R M] (c : R) :=
  Function.Injective ((c • ·) : M → M)

theorem IsLeftRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsLeftRegular c) : IsSMulRegular R c :=
  h

/-- Left-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `R`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isLeftRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} : IsLeftRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R a :=
  Iff.rfl

theorem IsRightRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsRightRegular c) :
    IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op c) :=
  h

/-- Right-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `Rᵐᵒᵖ`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isRightRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} :
    IsRightRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a) :=
  Iff.rfl

variable {M}

lemma isSMulRegular_map [SMul R M] [SMul S M] (f : R → S) (smul : ∀ m : M, f a • m = a • m) :
    IsSMulRegular M (f a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a := by simp [IsSMulRegular, smul]

protected alias ⟨IsSMulRegular.of_map, IsSMulRegular.map⟩ := isSMulRegular_map

namespace IsSMulRegular

@[simp] theorem natAbs_iff [SubtractionMonoid M] {n : ℤ} :
    IsSMulRegular M n.natAbs ↔ IsSMulRegular M n := by
  simp_rw [IsSMulRegular, Function.Injective]
  conv_rhs => rw [← n.sign_mul_natAbs]
  obtain h | h | h := n.sign_trichotomy
  · simp [h]
  · simp [Int.sign_eq_zero_iff_zero.mp h]
  · simp [h, neg_zsmul]

section SMul

variable [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]

/-- The product of `M`-regular elements is `M`-regular. -/
theorem smul (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rs : IsSMulRegular M s) : IsSMulRegular M (a • s) :=
  fun _ _ ab => rs (ra ((smul_assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (ab.trans (smul_assoc _ _ _))))

/-- If an element `b` becomes `M`-regular after multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular
element, then `b` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul (a : R) (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a • s)) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
  @Function.Injective.of_comp _ _ _ (fun m : M => a • m) _ fun c d cd => by
  dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at cd
  rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc] at cd
  exact ab cd

/-- An element is `M`-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular element
is `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem smul_iff (b : S) (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a • b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
  ⟨of_smul _, ha.smul⟩

theorem isLeftRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
  h

theorem isRightRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a)) :
    IsRightRegular a :=
  h

theorem mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rb : IsSMulRegular M b) :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) :=
  ra.smul rb

theorem of_mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a * b)) :
    IsSMulRegular M b := by
  rw [← smul_eq_mul] at ab
  exact ab.of_smul _

@[simp]
theorem mul_iff_right [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
  ⟨of_mul, ha.mul⟩

/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are `M`-regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are `M`-regular. -/

Target:
theorem mul_and_mul_iff [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ∧ IsSMulRegular M (b * a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_43d16e1f28 : False := True.intro
  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
  · rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
    exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
  · rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
    exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:125:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
  · rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
    exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
  · rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
    exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Defs
public import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
public import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
public import Mathlib.Tactic.Push

Namespace:
IsSMulRegular

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
/-!
# Action of regular elements on a module

We introduce `M`-regular elements, in the context of an `R`-module `M`.  The corresponding
predicate is called `IsSMulRegular`.

There are very limited typeclass assumptions on `R` and `M`, but the "mathematical" case of interest
is a commutative ring `R` acting on a module `M`. Since the properties are "multiplicative", there
is no actual requirement of having an addition, but there is a zero in both `R` and `M`.
Scalar multiplications involving `0` are, of course, all trivial.

The defining property is that an element `a ∈ R` is `M`-regular if the scalar multiplication map
`M → M`, defined by `m ↦ a • m`, is injective.

This property is the direct generalization to modules of the property `IsLeftRegular` defined in
`Algebra/Regular`.  Lemma `isLeftRegular_iff` shows that indeed the two notions
coincide.
-/

@[expose] public section

variable {R S : Type*} (M : Type*) {a b : R} {s : S}

/-- An `M`-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c` is an
injective map `M → M`. -/
def IsSMulRegular [SMul R M] (c : R) :=
  Function.Injective ((c • ·) : M → M)

theorem IsLeftRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsLeftRegular c) : IsSMulRegular R c :=
  h

/-- Left-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `R`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isLeftRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} : IsLeftRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R a :=
  Iff.rfl

theorem IsRightRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsRightRegular c) :
    IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op c) :=
  h

/-- Right-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `Rᵐᵒᵖ`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isRightRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} :
    IsRightRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a) :=
  Iff.rfl

variable {M}

lemma isSMulRegular_map [SMul R M] [SMul S M] (f : R → S) (smul : ∀ m : M, f a • m = a • m) :
    IsSMulRegular M (f a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a := by simp [IsSMulRegular, smul]

protected alias ⟨IsSMulRegular.of_map, IsSMulRegular.map⟩ := isSMulRegular_map

namespace IsSMulRegular

@[simp] theorem natAbs_iff [SubtractionMonoid M] {n : ℤ} :
    IsSMulRegular M n.natAbs ↔ IsSMulRegular M n := by
  simp_rw [IsSMulRegular, Function.Injective]
  conv_rhs => rw [← n.sign_mul_natAbs]
  obtain h | h | h := n.sign_trichotomy
  · simp [h]
  · simp [Int.sign_eq_zero_iff_zero.mp h]
  · simp [h, neg_zsmul]

section SMul

variable [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]

/-- The product of `M`-regular elements is `M`-regular. -/
theorem smul (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rs : IsSMulRegular M s) : IsSMulRegular M (a • s) :=
  fun _ _ ab => rs (ra ((smul_assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (ab.trans (smul_assoc _ _ _))))

/-- If an element `b` becomes `M`-regular after multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular
element, then `b` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul (a : R) (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a • s)) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
  @Function.Injective.of_comp _ _ _ (fun m : M => a • m) _ fun c d cd => by
  dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at cd
  rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc] at cd
  exact ab cd

/-- An element is `M`-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular element
is `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem smul_iff (b : S) (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a • b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
  ⟨of_smul _, ha.smul⟩

theorem isLeftRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
  h

theorem isRightRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a)) :
    IsRightRegular a :=
  h

theorem mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rb : IsSMulRegular M b) :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) :=
  ra.smul rb

theorem of_mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a * b)) :
    IsSMulRegular M b := by
  rw [← smul_eq_mul] at ab
  exact ab.of_smul _

@[simp]
theorem mul_iff_right [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
  ⟨of_mul, ha.mul⟩

/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are `M`-regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are `M`-regular. -/

Target:
theorem mul_and_mul_iff [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] :
    IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ∧ IsSMulRegular M (b * a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_43d16e1f28 : False := True.intro
  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
  · rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
    exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
  · rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
    exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:125:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:147:41: error(lean.invalidField): Invalid field `nonexistentProjection`: The environment does not contain `True.nonexistentProjection`, so it is not possible to project the field `nonexistentProjection` from an expression
  True.intro
of type `True`
<LEAN_FILE>:146:0: error: unsolved goals
𝕜 : Type u_1
E : Type u_2
F : Type u_3
inst✝¹⁰ : CommRing 𝕜
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup E
inst✝⁸ : AddCommGroup F
inst✝⁷ : Module 𝕜 E
inst✝⁶ : Module 𝕜 F
inst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace E
inst✝⁴ : TopologicalSpace F
inst✝³ : IsTopologicalAddGroup E
inst✝² : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E
inst✝¹ : IsTopologicalAddGroup F
inst✝ : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F
p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F
n : ℕ
c : Composition n
j : Fin n
v : Fin n → E
z : E
⊢ p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =
    Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)
      ((p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))) (Function.update (v ∘ ⇑(c.embedding (c.index j))) (c.invEmbedding j) z))

Response:
by
  ext k
  by_cases h : k = c.index j
  · rw [h]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
    simp only [Function.update_self]
    change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
    let j' := c.invEmbedding j
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
    suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
      convert! C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
    exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
  · simp only [h, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
    change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
    apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_notMem_range
    rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
public import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomialDef
public import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Composition

Namespace:
FormalMultilinearSeries

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johan Commelin
-/
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions

In this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.

The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then

`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.

For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.

To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.compAlongComposition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : Composition N`.

To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `Composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.

## Main results

* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
  `q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `AnalyticAt.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
* `FormalMultilinearSeries.comp_assoc` states that composition is associative on formal
  multilinear series.

## Implementation details

The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.compAlongComposition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `Composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, Composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `Composition`.

The associativity of composition on formal multilinear series is a nontrivial result: it does not
follow from the associativity of composition of analytic functions, as there is no uniqueness for
the formal multilinear series representing a function (and also, it holds even when the radius of
convergence of the series is `0`). Instead, we give a direct proof, which amounts to reordering
double sums in a careful way. The change of variables is a canonical (combinatorial) bijection
`Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi` between `(Σ (a : Composition n), Composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : Composition n), Π (i : Fin c.length), Composition (c.blocksFun i))`, and is described
in more details below in the paragraph on associativity.
-/

@[expose] public section

noncomputable section

variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E F G H : Type*}

open Filter List

open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal

section Topological

variable [CommRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace G]

/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/

namespace FormalMultilinearSeries

variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]

/-!
In this paragraph, we define the composition of formal multilinear series, by summing over all
possible compositions of `n`.
-/

/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `Fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.applyComposition c v i` for `v : Fin n → E` and `i : Fin c.length`. -/
def applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n) :
    (Fin n → E) → Fin c.length → F := fun v i => p (c.blocksFun i) (v ∘ c.embedding i)

theorem applyComposition_ones (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
    p.applyComposition (Composition.ones n) = fun v i =>
      p 1 fun _ => v (Fin.castLE (Composition.length_le _) i) := by
  funext v i
  apply p.congr (Composition.ones_blocksFun _ _)
  intro j hjn hj1
  obtain rfl : j = 0 := by lia
  refine congr_arg v ?_
  rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_castLE, Composition.ones_embedding, Fin.val_mk]

theorem applyComposition_single (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
    (v : Fin n → E) : p.applyComposition (Composition.single n hn) v = fun _j => p n v := by
  ext j
  refine p.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
  dsimp
  congr 1
  convert! Composition.single_embedding hn ⟨i, hi2⟩ using 1
  obtain ⟨j_val, j_property⟩ := j
  have : j_val = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 j_property)
  rw! [this]
  rfl

@[simp]
theorem removeZero_applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ}
    (c : Composition n) : p.removeZero.applyComposition c = p.applyComposition c := by
  ext v i
  simp [applyComposition, zero_lt_one.trans_le (c.one_le_blocksFun i), removeZero_of_pos]

/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.applyComposition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `applyComposition` retain
multilinearity. -/

Target:
theorem applyComposition_update (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
    (j : Fin n) (v : Fin n → E) (z : E) :
    p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =
      Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)
        (p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))
          (Function.update (v ∘ c.embedding (c.index j)) (c.invEmbedding j) z)) :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_80b372e782 := True.intro.nonexistentProjection
  ext k
  by_cases h : k = c.index j
  · rw [h]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
    simp only [Function.update_self]
    change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
    let j' := c.invEmbedding j
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
    suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
      convert! C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
    exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
  · simp only [h, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
    change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
    apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_notMem_range
    rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "invalid_projection", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:147:41: error(lean.invalidField): Invalid field `nonexistentProjection`: The environment does not contain `True.nonexistentProjection`, so it is not possible to project the field `nonexistentProjection` from an expression\n  True.intro\nof type `True`\n<LEAN_FILE>:146:0: error: unsolved goals\n𝕜 : Type u_1\nE : Type u_2\nF : Type u_3\ninst✝¹⁰ : CommRing 𝕜\ninst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup E\ninst✝⁸ : AddCommGroup F\ninst✝⁷ : Module 𝕜 E\ninst✝⁶ : Module 𝕜 F\ninst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace E\ninst✝⁴ : TopologicalSpace F\ninst✝³ : IsTopologicalAddGroup E\ninst✝² : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E\ninst✝¹ : IsTopologicalAddGroup F\ninst✝ : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F\np : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F\nn : ℕ\nc : Composition n\nj : Fin n\nv : Fin n → E\nz : E\n⊢ p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =\n    Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)\n      ((p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))) (Function.update (v ∘ ⇑(c.embedding (c.index j))) (c.invEmbedding j) z))", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  ext k
  by_cases h : k = c.index j
  · rw [h]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
    simp only [Function.update_self]
    change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
    let j' := c.invEmbedding j
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
    suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
      convert! C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
    exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
  · simp only [h, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
    change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
    apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_notMem_range
    rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
public import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomialDef
public import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Composition

Namespace:
FormalMultilinearSeries

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johan Commelin
-/
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions

In this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.

The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then

`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.

For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.

To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.compAlongComposition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : Composition N`.

To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `Composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.

## Main results

* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
  `q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `AnalyticAt.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
* `FormalMultilinearSeries.comp_assoc` states that composition is associative on formal
  multilinear series.

## Implementation details

The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.compAlongComposition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `Composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, Composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `Composition`.

The associativity of composition on formal multilinear series is a nontrivial result: it does not
follow from the associativity of composition of analytic functions, as there is no uniqueness for
the formal multilinear series representing a function (and also, it holds even when the radius of
convergence of the series is `0`). Instead, we give a direct proof, which amounts to reordering
double sums in a careful way. The change of variables is a canonical (combinatorial) bijection
`Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi` between `(Σ (a : Composition n), Composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : Composition n), Π (i : Fin c.length), Composition (c.blocksFun i))`, and is described
in more details below in the paragraph on associativity.
-/

@[expose] public section

noncomputable section

variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E F G H : Type*}

open Filter List

open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal

section Topological

variable [CommRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace G]

/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/

namespace FormalMultilinearSeries

variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]

/-!
In this paragraph, we define the composition of formal multilinear series, by summing over all
possible compositions of `n`.
-/

/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `Fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.applyComposition c v i` for `v : Fin n → E` and `i : Fin c.length`. -/
def applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n) :
    (Fin n → E) → Fin c.length → F := fun v i => p (c.blocksFun i) (v ∘ c.embedding i)

theorem applyComposition_ones (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
    p.applyComposition (Composition.ones n) = fun v i =>
      p 1 fun _ => v (Fin.castLE (Composition.length_le _) i) := by
  funext v i
  apply p.congr (Composition.ones_blocksFun _ _)
  intro j hjn hj1
  obtain rfl : j = 0 := by lia
  refine congr_arg v ?_
  rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_castLE, Composition.ones_embedding, Fin.val_mk]

theorem applyComposition_single (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
    (v : Fin n → E) : p.applyComposition (Composition.single n hn) v = fun _j => p n v := by
  ext j
  refine p.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
  dsimp
  congr 1
  convert! Composition.single_embedding hn ⟨i, hi2⟩ using 1
  obtain ⟨j_val, j_property⟩ := j
  have : j_val = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 j_property)
  rw! [this]
  rfl

@[simp]
theorem removeZero_applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ}
    (c : Composition n) : p.removeZero.applyComposition c = p.applyComposition c := by
  ext v i
  simp [applyComposition, zero_lt_one.trans_le (c.one_le_blocksFun i), removeZero_of_pos]

/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.applyComposition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `applyComposition` retain
multilinearity. -/

Target:
theorem applyComposition_update (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
    (j : Fin n) (v : Fin n → E) (z : E) :
    p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =
      Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)
        (p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))
          (Function.update (v ∘ c.embedding (c.index j)) (c.invEmbedding j) z)) :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_80b372e782 := True.intro.nonexistentProjection
  ext k
  by_cases h : k = c.index j
  · rw [h]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
    simp only [Function.update_self]
    change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
    let j' := c.invEmbedding j
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
    suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
      convert! C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
    exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
  · simp only [h, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
    let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
    change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
    suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
    apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_notMem_range
    rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "invalid_projection", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:147:41: error(lean.invalidField): Invalid field `nonexistentProjection`: The environment does not contain `True.nonexistentProjection`, so it is not possible to project the field `nonexistentProjection` from an expression\n  True.intro\nof type `True`\n<LEAN_FILE>:146:0: error: unsolved goals\n𝕜 : Type u_1\nE : Type u_2\nF : Type u_3\ninst✝¹⁰ : CommRing 𝕜\ninst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup E\ninst✝⁸ : AddCommGroup F\ninst✝⁷ : Module 𝕜 E\ninst✝⁶ : Module 𝕜 F\ninst✝⁵ : TopologicalSpace E\ninst✝⁴ : TopologicalSpace F\ninst✝³ : IsTopologicalAddGroup E\ninst✝² : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E\ninst✝¹ : IsTopologicalAddGroup F\ninst✝ : ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F\np : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F\nn : ℕ\nc : Composition n\nj : Fin n\nv : Fin n → E\nz : E\n⊢ p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =\n    Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)\n      ((p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))) (Function.update (v ∘ ⇑(c.embedding (c.index j))) (c.invEmbedding j) z))", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:44:38: error: Type mismatch
  True.intro
has type
  True
but is expected to have type
  False

Response:
by
  simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Basic
public import Mathlib.Topology.Continuous

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
/-! # Characterization of basic topological properties in terms of ultrafilters -/

public section

open Set Filter Topology

universe u v w x

variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X}
    {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {F : Filter α} {u : α → X}

theorem Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff {f : Ultrafilter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔ ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
  ⟨f.le_of_inf_neBot', fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds h⟩

theorem clusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {f : Filter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔
    ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, u ≤ f ∧ u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
  simp_rw [ClusterPt, ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]

theorem mapClusterPt_iff_ultrafilter :
    MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∃ U : Ultrafilter α, U ≤ F ∧ Tendsto u U (𝓝 x) := by
  simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, ← Filter.push_pull', map_neBot_iff, tendsto_iff_comap,
    ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]

theorem isOpen_iff_ultrafilter :
    IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ (l : Ultrafilter X), ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ l := by
  simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, ← mem_iff_ultrafilter]

/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
  supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/

Target:
theorem mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter :
    x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ u ∧ ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_9170f1a4d1 : False := True.intro
  simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:44:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Basic
public import Mathlib.Topology.Continuous

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
/-! # Characterization of basic topological properties in terms of ultrafilters -/

public section

open Set Filter Topology

universe u v w x

variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X}
    {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {F : Filter α} {u : α → X}

theorem Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff {f : Ultrafilter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔ ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
  ⟨f.le_of_inf_neBot', fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds h⟩

theorem clusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {f : Filter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔
    ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, u ≤ f ∧ u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
  simp_rw [ClusterPt, ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]

theorem mapClusterPt_iff_ultrafilter :
    MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∃ U : Ultrafilter α, U ≤ F ∧ Tendsto u U (𝓝 x) := by
  simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, ← Filter.push_pull', map_neBot_iff, tendsto_iff_comap,
    ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]

theorem isOpen_iff_ultrafilter :
    IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ (l : Ultrafilter X), ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ l := by
  simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, ← mem_iff_ultrafilter]

/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
  supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/

Target:
theorem mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter :
    x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ u ∧ ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_9170f1a4d1 : False := True.intro
  simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "type_mismatch_wrong_shape", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:44:38: error: Type mismatch\n  True.intro\nhas type\n  True\nbut is expected to have type\n  False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:135:35: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `__oprover_overlong_4f8f4a61cf`
<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals
α : Type u_4
β : Type u_5
R : α → β → Prop
inst✝ : IsEmpty β
⊢ RightTotal R

Response:
by
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
public import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty.Defs
public import Mathlib.Logic.Relator

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
/-!
In this file we prove some basic properties about the typeclass `IsEmpty`.
-/

public section

variable {α β γ : Sort*}

@[simp, push]
theorem not_nonempty_iff : ¬Nonempty α ↔ IsEmpty α :=
  ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ h ⟨x⟩⟩, fun h1 h2 ↦ h2.elim h1.elim⟩

@[simp, push]
theorem not_isEmpty_iff : ¬IsEmpty α ↔ Nonempty α :=
  not_iff_comm.mp not_nonempty_iff

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_Prop {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prop]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pi {π : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (∀ a, π a) ↔ ∃ a, IsEmpty (π a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, Classical.nonempty_pi, not_forall]

theorem isEmpty_fun : IsEmpty (α → β) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  rw [isEmpty_pi, ← exists_true_iff_nonempty, ← exists_and_right, true_and]

@[simp]
theorem nonempty_fun : Nonempty (α → β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty β :=
  not_iff_not.mp <| by rw [not_or, not_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff, isEmpty_fun, not_isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sigma {α} {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sigma, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psigma {α} {E : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (PSigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psigma, not_exists]

theorem isEmpty_subtype (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) ↔ ∀ x, ¬p x := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_subtype, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_prod {α β : Type*} : IsEmpty (α × β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pprod : IsEmpty (PProd α β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_pprod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕ β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕' β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_ulift {α} : IsEmpty (ULift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_ulift]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_plift {α} : IsEmpty (PLift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_plift]

theorem wellFounded_of_isEmpty {α} [IsEmpty α] (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFounded r :=
  ⟨isEmptyElim⟩

variable (α)

theorem isEmpty_or_nonempty : IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty α :=
  (em <| IsEmpty α).elim Or.inl <| Or.inr ∘ not_isEmpty_iff.mp

@[simp]
theorem not_isEmpty_of_nonempty [h : Nonempty α] : ¬IsEmpty α :=
  not_isEmpty_iff.mpr h

variable {α}

theorem Function.extend_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (h : β → γ) :
    Function.extend f g h = h :=
  funext fun _ ↦ (Function.extend_apply' _ _ _) fun ⟨a, _⟩ ↦ isEmptyElim a

open Relator

variable {α β : Type*} (R : α → β → Prop)

@[simp]
theorem leftTotal_empty [IsEmpty α] : LeftTotal R := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

theorem leftTotal_iff_isEmpty_left [IsEmpty β] : LeftTotal R ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.exists_iff, isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]

Target:
theorem rightTotal_empty [IsEmpty β] : RightTotal R :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_pad_0_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_1_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_2_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_3_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_4_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_5_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_6_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_7_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_8_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_9_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_10_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_11_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_12_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_13_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_14_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_15_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_16_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_17_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_18_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_19_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_20_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_21_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_22_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_23_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_fail_4f8f4a61cf := __oprover_overlong_4f8f4a61cf
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:135:35: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `__oprover_overlong_4f8f4a61cf`\n<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals\nα : Type u_4\nβ : Type u_5\nR : α → β → Prop\ninst✝ : IsEmpty β\n⊢ RightTotal R", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
public import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty.Defs
public import Mathlib.Logic.Relator

Namespace:
(root)

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
/-!
In this file we prove some basic properties about the typeclass `IsEmpty`.
-/

public section

variable {α β γ : Sort*}

@[simp, push]
theorem not_nonempty_iff : ¬Nonempty α ↔ IsEmpty α :=
  ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ h ⟨x⟩⟩, fun h1 h2 ↦ h2.elim h1.elim⟩

@[simp, push]
theorem not_isEmpty_iff : ¬IsEmpty α ↔ Nonempty α :=
  not_iff_comm.mp not_nonempty_iff

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_Prop {p : Prop} : IsEmpty p ↔ ¬p := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prop]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pi {π : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (∀ a, π a) ↔ ∃ a, IsEmpty (π a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, Classical.nonempty_pi, not_forall]

theorem isEmpty_fun : IsEmpty (α → β) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  rw [isEmpty_pi, ← exists_true_iff_nonempty, ← exists_and_right, true_and]

@[simp]
theorem nonempty_fun : Nonempty (α → β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty β :=
  not_iff_not.mp <| by rw [not_or, not_nonempty_iff, not_nonempty_iff, isEmpty_fun, not_isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sigma {α} {E : α → Type*} : IsEmpty (Sigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sigma, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psigma {α} {E : α → Sort*} : IsEmpty (PSigma E) ↔ ∀ a, IsEmpty (E a) := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psigma, not_exists]

theorem isEmpty_subtype (p : α → Prop) : IsEmpty (Subtype p) ↔ ∀ x, ¬p x := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_subtype, not_exists]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_prod {α β : Type*} : IsEmpty (α × β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_prod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_pprod : IsEmpty (PProd α β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_pprod, not_and_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_sum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕ β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_sum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_psum {α β} : IsEmpty (α ⊕' β) ↔ IsEmpty α ∧ IsEmpty β := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_psum, not_or]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_ulift {α} : IsEmpty (ULift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_ulift]

@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_plift {α} : IsEmpty (PLift α) ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, nonempty_plift]

theorem wellFounded_of_isEmpty {α} [IsEmpty α] (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFounded r :=
  ⟨isEmptyElim⟩

variable (α)

theorem isEmpty_or_nonempty : IsEmpty α ∨ Nonempty α :=
  (em <| IsEmpty α).elim Or.inl <| Or.inr ∘ not_isEmpty_iff.mp

@[simp]
theorem not_isEmpty_of_nonempty [h : Nonempty α] : ¬IsEmpty α :=
  not_isEmpty_iff.mpr h

variable {α}

theorem Function.extend_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (h : β → γ) :
    Function.extend f g h = h :=
  funext fun _ ↦ (Function.extend_apply' _ _ _) fun ⟨a, _⟩ ↦ isEmptyElim a

open Relator

variable {α β : Type*} (R : α → β → Prop)

@[simp]
theorem leftTotal_empty [IsEmpty α] : LeftTotal R := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

theorem leftTotal_iff_isEmpty_left [IsEmpty β] : LeftTotal R ↔ IsEmpty α := by
  simp only [LeftTotal, IsEmpty.exists_iff, isEmpty_iff]

@[simp]

Target:
theorem rightTotal_empty [IsEmpty β] : RightTotal R :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_pad_0_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_1_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_2_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_3_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_4_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_5_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_6_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_7_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_8_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_9_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_10_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_11_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_12_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_13_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_14_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_15_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_16_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_17_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_18_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_19_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_20_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_21_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_22_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_pad_23_4f8f4a61cf : True := by trivial
  have __repair_fail_4f8f4a61cf := __oprover_overlong_4f8f4a61cf
  simp only [RightTotal, IsEmpty.forall_iff]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unknown_identifier_namespace_import", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:135:35: error(lean.unknownIdentifier): Unknown identifier `__oprover_overlong_4f8f4a61cf`\n<LEAN_FILE>:110:0: error: unsolved goals\nα : Type u_4\nβ : Type u_5\nR : α → β → Prop\ninst✝ : IsEmpty β\n⊢ RightTotal R", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:


<LEAN_FILE>:79:43: error: unsolved goals
C : Type u₁
D : Type u₂
inst✝¹ : Category.{v₁, u₁} C
inst✝ : Category.{v₂, u₂} D
P : ProfunctorCore.{w, v₁, v₂, u₁, u₂} C D
X : C
Y Y' Y'' : D
g : Y ⟶ Y'
g' : Y' ⟶ Y''
⊢ False

Response:
by
  nth_rw 1 [← Category.id_comp (𝟙 X)]
  simp only [P.map_comp]

[User]
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Yoneda

Namespace:
CategoryTheory.ProfunctorCore

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2026 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson, Adam Topaz, Adrian Marti
-/
/-!

# Profunctors

A profunctor from a category `C` to a category `D` is a functor from `C` to a category of
presheaves of sets on `D`. We define this as `Profunctor.{w} C D := C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`.

This file provides convenient constructors `ProfunctorCore` and `ProfunctorCore.Hom` for profunctors
and natural transformations between them. We also define the identity profunctor `Profunctor.id`
as the Yoneda bifunctor, the opposite of a profunctor, the `ulift` of a profunctor, whiskering
of a profunctor with functors, and the profunctors in both directions corresponding to a functor
`C ⥤ D` (see `Functor.toProfunctor` and `Functor.toProfunctorFlip`).

## Future work

- Define composition of profunctors.
- Define the bicategory of categories where the 1-morphisms are profunctors.
-/

@[expose] public section

namespace CategoryTheory

open Opposite

universe w' w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂

variable (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D]

/-- Custom structure to construct profunctors, i.e. bifunctors `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
structure ProfunctorCore where
  /-- The object part -/
  obj : C → D → Type w
  /-- The morphism part -/
  map {X X' : C} {Y Y' : D} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') : obj X Y' ⟶ obj X' Y
  map_id (X : C) (Y : D) : map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by cat_disch
  map_comp {X₁ X₂ X₃ : C} {Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : D} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (f' : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) (g' : Y₂ ⟶ Y₃) :
    map (f ≫ f') (g ≫ g') = map f g' ≫ map f' g := by cat_disch

attribute [simp] ProfunctorCore.map_id ProfunctorCore.map_comp

/-- A profunctor from C to D (`Profunctor.{w} C D`) is a bifunctor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
abbrev Profunctor := C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w

variable {C D}

/-- Typecheck a bifunctor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` as a profunctor. -/
abbrev Functor.profunctor (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : Profunctor.{w} C D := F

namespace ProfunctorCore

/-- Custom structure to construct natural transformations between profunctors, see
`CategoryTheory.Profunctor.ofHom`. -/
structure Hom (P Q : ProfunctorCore.{w} C D) where
  /-- The components of the natural transformation -/
  app (X : C) (Y : D) : P.obj X Y ⟶ Q.obj X Y
  naturality ⦃X X' : C⦄ ⦃Y Y' : D⦄ (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
    P.map f g ≫ app X' Y = app X Y' ≫ Q.map f g := by cat_disch

attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ProfunctorCore.Hom.naturality

@[simp]

Target:
lemma map_id_comp (P : ProfunctorCore.{w} C D) (X : C) {Y Y' Y'' : D}
    (g : Y ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Y'') :
    P.map (𝟙 X) (g ≫ g') = P.map (𝟙 X) g' ≫ P.map (𝟙 X) g :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_plan_77d14404f9 : False := by
    skip
  nth_rw 1 [← Category.id_comp (𝟙 X)]
  simp only [P.map_comp]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unsolved_goals_multistep_planning", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:79:43: error: unsolved goals\nC : Type u₁\nD : Type u₂\ninst✝¹ : Category.{v₁, u₁} C\ninst✝ : Category.{v₂, u₂} D\nP : ProfunctorCore.{w, v₁, v₂, u₁, u₂} C D\nX : C\nY Y' Y'' : D\ng : Y ⟶ Y'\ng' : Y' ⟶ Y''\n⊢ False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof:

[Assistant]
by
  nth_rw 1 [← Category.id_comp (𝟙 X)]
  simp only [P.map_comp]

Prompt:
Repair the failed Lean proof using the exact public context below. Return only one corrected proof body beginning with `by`; no prose or fences.

Imports:
public import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Yoneda

Namespace:
CategoryTheory.ProfunctorCore

Local safe context:
/-
Copyright (c) 2026 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson, Adam Topaz, Adrian Marti
-/
/-!

# Profunctors

A profunctor from a category `C` to a category `D` is a functor from `C` to a category of
presheaves of sets on `D`. We define this as `Profunctor.{w} C D := C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`.

This file provides convenient constructors `ProfunctorCore` and `ProfunctorCore.Hom` for profunctors
and natural transformations between them. We also define the identity profunctor `Profunctor.id`
as the Yoneda bifunctor, the opposite of a profunctor, the `ulift` of a profunctor, whiskering
of a profunctor with functors, and the profunctors in both directions corresponding to a functor
`C ⥤ D` (see `Functor.toProfunctor` and `Functor.toProfunctorFlip`).

## Future work

- Define composition of profunctors.
- Define the bicategory of categories where the 1-morphisms are profunctors.
-/

@[expose] public section

namespace CategoryTheory

open Opposite

universe w' w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂

variable (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D]

/-- Custom structure to construct profunctors, i.e. bifunctors `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
structure ProfunctorCore where
  /-- The object part -/
  obj : C → D → Type w
  /-- The morphism part -/
  map {X X' : C} {Y Y' : D} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') : obj X Y' ⟶ obj X' Y
  map_id (X : C) (Y : D) : map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by cat_disch
  map_comp {X₁ X₂ X₃ : C} {Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : D} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (f' : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (g : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) (g' : Y₂ ⟶ Y₃) :
    map (f ≫ f') (g ≫ g') = map f g' ≫ map f' g := by cat_disch

attribute [simp] ProfunctorCore.map_id ProfunctorCore.map_comp

/-- A profunctor from C to D (`Profunctor.{w} C D`) is a bifunctor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
abbrev Profunctor := C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w

variable {C D}

/-- Typecheck a bifunctor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` as a profunctor. -/
abbrev Functor.profunctor (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : Profunctor.{w} C D := F

namespace ProfunctorCore

/-- Custom structure to construct natural transformations between profunctors, see
`CategoryTheory.Profunctor.ofHom`. -/
structure Hom (P Q : ProfunctorCore.{w} C D) where
  /-- The components of the natural transformation -/
  app (X : C) (Y : D) : P.obj X Y ⟶ Q.obj X Y
  naturality ⦃X X' : C⦄ ⦃Y Y' : D⦄ (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
    P.map f g ≫ app X' Y = app X Y' ≫ Q.map f g := by cat_disch

attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ProfunctorCore.Hom.naturality

@[simp]

Target:
lemma map_id_comp (P : ProfunctorCore.{w} C D) (X : C) {Y Y' Y'' : D}
    (g : Y ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Y'') :
    P.map (𝟙 X) (g ≫ g') = P.map (𝟙 X) g' ≫ P.map (𝟙 X) g :=

Failed candidate:
by
  have __repair_plan_77d14404f9 : False := by
    skip
  nth_rw 1 [← Category.id_comp (𝟙 X)]
  simp only [P.map_comp]

Structured Lean error:
{"kind": "unsolved_goals_multistep_planning", "message": "<LEAN_FILE>:79:43: error: unsolved goals\nC : Type u₁\nD : Type u₂\ninst✝¹ : Category.{v₁, u₁} C\ninst✝ : Category.{v₂, u₂} D\nP : ProfunctorCore.{w, v₁, v₂, u₁, u₂} C D\nX : C\nY Y' Y'' : D\ng : Y ⟶ Y'\ng' : Y' ⟶ Y''\n⊢ False", "returncode": 1}

Corrected proof: