Datasets:
File size: 6,385 Bytes
edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb 4205457 edceceb | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 | ---
license: mit
task_categories:
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- bash
- shell
- code
- instruction-tuning
- sft
- command-line
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
pretty_name: Bash Instruction-Tuning Dataset
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files: bash_dataset.jsonl
---
# Bash Instruction-Tuning Dataset (~55k)
A synthetic instruction-tuning dataset that pairs natural-language requests with
correct Bash solutions, built for fine-tuning small LLMs to translate plain
requests into runnable shell commands, pipelines, and scripts.
Each example is a chat conversation (system / user / assistant) plus two metadata
fields (`category`, `utility`) for slicing and analysis.
## Format
One JSON object per line (`bash_dataset.jsonl`):
```json
{
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a Bash expert."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Show the last 20 lines of error.log."},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "tail -n 20 error.log"}
],
"category": "single",
"utility": "tail"
}
```
- `messages` — the training conversation. The system prompt is one of 5 equivalent
Bash-assistant prompts (rotated so the model doesn't overfit a single string).
- `category` — `single` | `pipeline` | `script` (see below).
- `utility` — the primary command of the solution (e.g. `grep`, `awk`, `find`,
`for`), used to enforce a per-command cap and to analyze coverage.
Scripts (`category == "script"`) contain real multi-line Bash (JSON-escaped `\n`),
typically with `set -euo pipefail`, functions, `getopts`, `trap` cleanup, loops,
here-docs, etc.
## Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Examples | 55,000 |
| `single` (one-shot commands) | 22,000 (40%) |
| `pipeline` (pipes, `&&`/`\|\|`, `$(...)`, `xargs`) | 19,250 (35%) |
| `script` (multi-line) | 13,750 (25%) |
| Distinct primary utilities | 89 |
| Max share of any one utility | 4.00% (hard cap 2,200/util) |
| Unique user (NL) strings | 98.7% |
| Unique assistant (Bash) strings | 75.6% |
| Argument fidelity | 100% (0 request/command noun mismatches) |
| Largest shared 4-word NL opening | 1.4% |
**Validity**: 100% pass `bash -n` (0 syntax errors). Static analysis with
shellcheck flags no warning-level findings on **96%** of a 4,000-example sample;
almost all remaining findings are a single style nit (`SC2010`, `ls | grep`).
**Argument fidelity**: every example is checked so the command actually
references the concrete nouns named in the request — the same filename,
extension, user, group, service, process, and port. This is enforced at
generation time by a hard gate (`argcheck.py`); the shipped file has **0**
mismatches. (An earlier version of this generator had ~12% argument mismatches
that `bash -n`/shellcheck could not detect, because a wrong filename still
parses and lints; the gate exists specifically to prevent that.)
**Coverage of system/info utilities** that small models often get wrong
(counts include single + pipeline + script uses):
| util | n | util | n | util | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| journalctl | 2200 | lsof | 648 | ss | 481 |
| pstree | 753 | renice | 365 | nice | 293 |
| vmstat | 288 | netstat | 234 | iostat | 183 |
| w | 158 | dmesg | 154 | free | 90 |
| uptime | 34 | hostname | 25 | | |
(`uptime` / `hostname` are lower because their genuine idiomatic command space is
small; they are covered with real flag variants rather than padded phrasings.)
## How it was built
Generated by a recipe engine (`generate.py`, included). Each recipe family emits
`(request, command)` pairs by combining hand-written phrasing templates
(imperative / question / casual) with realistic parameter pools (plausible file
names, directories, ports, services, users, patterns). The generator enforces:
- category quotas (40 / 35 / 25),
- a 4% per-utility cap so no command dominates (a real failure mode of earlier runs),
- minimum floors for the info/system utilities above,
- SHA-1 deduplication of `(request, command)` pairs,
- an **argument-fidelity gate** (`argcheck.py`) — the command must reference the
same concrete nouns the request names, or the pair is rejected,
- phrasing diversification so no single opening template dominates,
- a `bash -n` syntax gate on every command before it is written.
Every parameter (filename, dir, extension, user, ...) is drawn once per example
and reused in both the request and the command, so they never disagree.
## Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("json", data_files="bash_dataset.jsonl", split="train")
print(ds[0]["messages"])
# analyze by slice
import collections
print(collections.Counter(ds["category"]))
print(collections.Counter(ds["utility"]).most_common(15))
```
The dataset viewer will expose `messages`, `category`, and `utility` as columns.
## Intended use & limitations
**Good for**: teaching a small model to map natural-language requests to correct
single Bash commands, short pipelines, and small scripts — including the
system/info utilities listed above.
**Limitations (be aware before relying on it):**
- **Synthetic.** Variety comes from recombining templates and token pools, not
from human authorship. Phrasing is diversified (no opening template exceeds
~1.5% of rows, NL strings are 98.7% unique), but the underlying request shapes
are still generated from a finite set of families; ~24% of commands recur with
different phrasings.
- **Validity ≠ full semantic correctness.** `bash -n` + shellcheck prove the
commands parse and lint clean, and the argument-fidelity gate guarantees the
command uses the nouns from the request; none of these prove the command's
*logic* perfectly satisfies the intent. Some pairs are plausible-but-approximate
(e.g. an `awk` column index assumes a particular log layout).
- **Single-turn, one canonical answer.** No explanations, alternatives, negative
examples, or multi-turn dialogue.
- **Not executed at scale on real Linux.** Many commands (`systemctl`,
`journalctl`, `apt`, `vmstat`, …) are idiomatic but were validated statically,
not run.
## Files
- `bash_dataset.jsonl` — the dataset (55,000 rows).
- `generate.py` — the generator (reproducible; resumable via `progress.json`).
- `argcheck.py` — the argument-fidelity checker used as the generation gate;
also runnable as a standalone auditor over the dataset.
- `README.md` — this card.
|