Enumeration of Service Announcement Mode.
Additional service announcement modes may be added in the future.
The Content Provider wishes to collect consumption reports for the service.
Reporting start and end time: The reporting period with start and end time.
Reporting interval: The interval for which the BM-SC is aggregate the statistics in seconds. (Data type: number; default value: 3600)
| | + +| | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------|--------|--|------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | | | | |Sample percentage: Percentage of users to collect reports from (Data type: number; default value: 10)
The presence of this object indicates the enabling of consumption reporting; if not present, it indicates the disabling of the consumption reporting.
| | +| push-notification-url | string | | None | “” |The Content Provider provides Notification URL over which it will receive notifications "pushed" by the BM-SC. The Notification procedure is described in subclause 5.3.6. of 3GPP TS 26.348 [33]
| | +| push-notification-configuration | string | | None | All |If the Content Provider enables push delivery of notifications, then the Content Provider may provide notification filters
This parameter contains a comma separated list of Classes it wishes to receive among the following options: Critical, Warning, Information, Service, Session, or All to get all types of notification.
The notification message shall be sent immediately to the Content Provider upon its availability.
| | + +NOTE: Properties marked with a supported feature are applicable as described in subclause 9. + +The service instance resource with the properties defined above can be found in Annex B. + +#### 5.2.1.2 API Operations + +##### 5.2.1.2.1 Introduction + +Services can be created, updated, or deleted at the BM-SC by the Content Provider, or the properties of a previously created service at the BM-SC may be obtained by the Content Provider, by invoking HTTP methods on the "service" instance resource or the "services" collection resource. + +##### 5.2.1.2.2 Service Creation + +POST /xmb/v1.0/services + +To create a service, the Content Provider shall use the HTTP POST method on the "services" collection resource as follows: + +- the request URI with the "path" part is set to: "/xmb/v1.0/services". +- the Host field is set to the address of the BM-SC + +The Content Provider shall follow the procedures defined in subclause 9 to advertise support of any feature. + +The content body of the POST request shall be empty. Upon receipt of the HTTP POST request from the Content Provider to create a service, the BM-SC will check whether the Content Provider is authenticated and authorized to create services as described in clause 7. If the authorization fails, the BM-SC shall send a 401 message as described in Table 5.2.1.2.2-1. If the authorization is successful, the BM-SC shall create a service with default service property values as described in subclause 5.2.1.1. Upon successful creation of a service, the BM-SC shall respond to the Content Provider with a 201 message indicating that the service is successfully created along with the service resource identifier of the service resource. The service resource identifier is the identifier that uniquely identifies the service. When the Content Provider receives the service resource identifier, it shall use this identifier in subsequent requests to the BM-SC + +to refer to this service. Alternatively, if the creation of service failed, the BM-SC shall send a 403 message to the Content Provider. + +Both the Content Provider and BM-SC shall remember the negotiated features for the lifetime of the service. + +The possible response messages from the BM-SC, depending on whether the POST request is successful or unsuccessful, are shown in Table 5.2.1.2.2-1. + +**Table 5.2.1.2.2-1: Response status code, message, and contents for service creation** + +| Status Code | Message | Contents | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 201 Created | Service created successfully | The BM-SC shall send the service resource identifier of the created service. | +| 401 Unauthorized | Request requires user authentication | In accordance to conditions as described in IETF RFC 7231 [6] and IETF RFC 7235 [8] | +| 403 Forbidden | Request cannot be fulfilled | The BM-SC may include optional text to indicate why the request could not be fulfilled | +| 412 Precondition Failed | Request cannot be fulfilled | The precondition given in one or more of the request-header fields evaluated to false when it was tested on the recipient. | +| Note: In addition to the above response codes, the BM-SC can also send appropriate response codes described in IETF RFC 7231 [6] as applicable. | | | + +##### 5.2.1.2.3 Service Modification + +###### 5.2.1.2.3.1 Partial Modification of Service Properties + +PATCH /xmb/v1.0/services/{service-res-id} + +Assuming that a service has been created using the service creation method described in subclause 5.2.1.2.2, partial updating of its properties can be performed by the Content Provider using the HTTP PATCH method on the "service" instance resource as follows: + +- the request URI with the "path" part is set to: "/xmb/v1.0/services/{service-res-id}" +- the Host field is set to the address of the BM-SC +- the Content-Type header field is set to "application/json" +- the body of the message is encoded in JSON format + +The {service-res-id} in the request URI is the service resource identifier of the service as allocated by the BM-SC during service creation. + +The content body of the service modification request shall contain updated partial representation of the service resource. The representation of the service is based on the JSON schema of the service resource as described in subclause 5.2.1.1. Further, one or more properties of the service listed in Table 5.2.1.1-1, with the exception that the value of the properties "id", "service-id", "pull-notification-url" and "receive-only-mode" cannot be modified. + +Upon receipt of the HTTP PATCH request from the Content Provider to update a service, the BM-SC will check whether the Content Provider is authenticated and authorized to update services as described in clause 7. If the authorization fails, the BM-SC shall send a 401 message. If the authorization is successful, the BM-SC shall update the requested service. Upon successful updating of the requested service, the BM-SC shall respond to the Content Provider with a 200 OK message indicating that the service is successfully updated along with the updated service resource. If the service was not found, the BM-SC shall send a 404 Not Found message. If the service cannot be updated, the BM-SC shall send a 403 Forbidden message to the Content Provider. + +The possible response messages from the BM-SC, depending on whether the PATCH request is successful or unsuccessful, are shown in Table 5.2.1.2.3.1-1. + +**Table 5.2.1.2.3.1-1: Response status code, message, and contents for service modification using HTTP PATCH** + +| Status Code | Message | Contents | +|-------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| 200 OK | The request has succeeded | The BM-SC shall send the service resource that is modified | + +| | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 204 No Content | The request has succeeded | None | +| 401 Unauthorized | Request requires user authentication | In accordance to conditions as described in IETF RFC 7231 [6] and IETF RFC 7235 [8] | +| 403 Forbidden | Request cannot be fulfilled | The BM-SC may include optional text to indicate why the request could not fulfilled | +| 404 Not Found | Requested resource not found | None | +| Note: In addition to the above response codes, the BM-SC can also send appropriate response codes described in IETF RFC 7231 [6] as applicable. | | | + +###### 5.2.1.2.3.2 Full Modification of Service Properties + +PUT /xmb/v1.0/services/{service-res-id} + +Assuming that a service has been created using the service creation method described in sub clause 5.2.1.2.2, full modification of its properties can be performed by the Content Provider using the HTTP PUT method on the "service" instance resource as follows: + +- the request URI with the "path" part is set to: "/xmb/v1.0/services/{service-res-id}". +- the Host field is set to the address of the BM-SC +- the Content-Type header field is set to "application/json" +- the body of the message is encoded in JSON format + +The {service-res-id} in the request URI is the service resource identifier of the service as allocated by the BM-SC during service creation. + +The content body of the service update request shall contain the updated representation of the service resource. The representation of the service is based on the JSON schema of the service resource as described in subclause 5.2.1.1. Furthermore, when HTTP PUT method is used for updating the service, the Content Provider shall specify the updated values of all the service properties with the exception that the value of the properties "id", "service-id", "pull-notification-url" and "receive-only-mode" cannot be modified. + +Upon receipt of the HTTP PUT request from the Content Provider to update a service, the BM-SC will check whether the Content Provider is authenticated and authorized to update services as described in clause 7. If the authorization fails, the BM-SC shall send a 401 message as described in Table 5.2.1.2.3.2-1. If the authorization is successful, the BM-SC update the requested service. While updating the service representation, the BM-SC shall overwrite the values of all properties of the service being updated with the values provided in the update request. Upon successful update of the requested service, the BM-SC shall respond to the Content Provider with a 200 OK success message indicating that the service is successfully updated along with the updated service resource. If the service was not found, the BM-SC shall send a 404 Not Found message. If the service cannot be updated, the BM-SC shall send a 403 Forbidden message to the Content Provider. + +The possible response messages from the BM-SC, depending on whether the PUT request is successful or unsuccessful, are shown in Table 5.2.1.2.3.2-1. + +**Table 5.2.1.2.3.2-1: Response status code, message, and contents for service modification using HTTP PUT** + +| Status Code | Message | Contents | +|------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 200 OK | The request has succeeded | The BM-SC shall send the service resource that is modified | +| 204 No Content | The request has succeeded | None | +| 401 Unauthorized | Request requires user authentication | In accordance to conditions as described in IETF RFC 7231 [6] and IETF RFC 7235 [8] | + +| | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 403supported, the content of each string follows the format specified by subclause 5.4.7 of 3GPP TS 26.348 [33].
Else, the content of each string item is left to the business agreement between the Content Provider and the Operator.
| | +| qoe-reporting-configuration | object | | |The Content Provider wishes to collect QoE reports for the session. The Content Provider can supply a list of QoE metric configurations where each metric configuration shall contain:
Metric name: Name of QoE metric
Metric type: Type of metric
Reporting interval: The interval at which the BM-SC should periodically aggregate and report the statistics to the Content Provider.
Sample percentage: Percentage of users to collect reports from
Start time: Start time of report collection
End time: End time of report collection
If this configuration is included, the QoE reporting configuration shall be applied only for this session., and the Content Provider is requesting override of service level configuration for this session by this configuration.
Note: SA4 should define the list of parameters for qoe-reporting-configuration. SA4 shall also indicate if service level qoe-reporting configuration can be applied.
| | +| session-type | string | None | Files |The Session Type represents the method used by the Content Provider in providing content to the BM-SC (via xMB-U). The BM-SC shall select the appropriate delivery method from the Session Type.
Valid values: "Streaming", "Files", "Application", "Transport-Mode"
When the Session Type is set to "Streaming", the BM-SC expects a Streaming type input (RTP), and the format shall compliant to MBMS streaming (as defined in 3GPP TS 26.346 [3]).
| | + +| | | | | | | +|--------------------|---------------------|------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| | | | |When the Session Type is set to "Files", the BM-SC expects generic files as input. The files can be provided either by on-request pull interactions or continuous push ingest.
When the Session Type is set to "Application", then the ingest method depends on the application service description.
When the Application Service Description corresponds to DASH, the BM-SC expects an MPD and optionally one or more Initialization Segments. The content is assumed to be 3GP-DASH compliant (as defined by 3GPP TS 26.247 [18]). The BM-SC may either pull the Media Segments from the Content Provider or the Content Provider will continuously push Media Segments to the BM-SC.
When the Session Type is set to "Transport-Mode", the BM-SC provides transport of data/TV content in a transparent manner. The Content Provider may provide some properties for the MBMS distribution.
The Session Type shall be extensible to include other session types.
| | +| max-cid | integer | none | none |integer indicating the MAX_CID parameter for the compressor (see IETF RFC 5795 [27]). The value for the LARGE_CID parameter (usage of short CID representation or large CID representation) shall be deducted from MAX_CID as follows:
If MAX_CID > 15 then
LARGE_CIDS = TRUE else
LARGE_CIDS = FALSE.
When header compression applies, the "max-cid" property shall be provided together with "header-compression" property.
| ROHC | +| header-compression |Requests the BM-SC to enable ROHC (see IETF RFC 5795 [27] and IETF RFC 3095 [28]) on the input flow. The object consists of:
IPv4 IPv6 notation according to clause 5 of IETF RFC 5952 shall not be used.
- "port": integer between 0 and 65535 identifying a UDP or TCP port
- "periodicity": a number denoting the target periodicity for ROHC full header packets in units of seconds
- "profile": integer denoting the applicable ROHC profile (see IETF RFC 5795 [27]). The value is restricted to the 0x0001 RTP/UDP/IP profile or the 0x0002 UDP/IP profile, 0x0001 profile applies if omitted.
Either "ipv4addr" or "ipv6addr" shall be included and "port" and "periodicity" may be included.
The BM-SC shall:
Requests the BM-SC to perform FEC (see IETF RFC 6363 [29]) protection of the input flow when transmitting over the MBMS channel. The string shall include an SDP description of FEC framework configuration information (see subclause 5.5 of IETF RFC 6363 [29]) formatted according to subclause 8A.5 of 3GPP TS 26.346 [3].
| FEC | +| resource-sharing-ind | boolean | none | false |The resource sharing indication.
When present and set to "true", it implies the current transmission resources can be shared with other sessions.
| ResourceSharing | + +| | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------|--------|----------|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | | | | Note that other sessions will use the same Max Bitrate, Geographical Area and (in case of MC Services) QoS-Information. | | +| resource-sharing-url | string | none | none |The resource sharing id.
When present in the session modification request, the value of the field identifies an existing xMB session resource URL (as specified in table 5.1.1-1) to share the transmission, where Max Bitrate, Geographical Area and (in case of MC Services) QoS-Information are re-used.
Note that the Max Bitrate, Geographical Area and (in case of MC Services) QoS-Information cannot be changed since the values from the original session will be used.
| ResourceSharing | +| session-announcement-mode | string | – None – | Other |Represents the session announcement mode. The session announcement mode is either "Content Provider" or "SACH", with the following behavior:
"Content Provider": The BMSC generates the session parameters and provides those to the Content Provider.
"SACH": In this case, the session announcement is done by the MBMS system through the SACH. (see Annex L.2, L.3 of 3GPP TS 26.346 [3]).
Additional modes may be added in future releases.
Only applicable if the Session Type is set to "Transport-Mode"
| Transport | +| userplane-session-description-parameters | object | | |This property provides information to the BM-SC on where and how to access the user plane content from the content provider, and comprises one or more of the following components:
Type: the type of the content associated with the target resource, for example the Internet Media Type of the resource as identified by an HTTP/S URL. An "embedded" type is defined, which indicates that the xMB-U user plane parameters are embedded in the User Plane Parameters object described below.
Access URL: A URL that enables the access to and possibly control of the ingest session. The URL may, for example, be an RTSP URL, a reference to an SDP that
| Transport | + +| | | | | | | +|--|--|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | | | |describes a multicast stream, or an HTTP/S URL to retrieve an already-packaged MPEG2-TS stream.
User Plane Parameters: When the Type is set to "embedded", the Content Provider shall provide an object to the BM-SC which contains the session description.
If this property is set to Forward-only, the object may contain a ready-made Session Description and the indication of a single xMB-U reception UDP port. When a Session Description is present, the BM-SC shall use it for Service Announcement.
If this property is set to Proxy, the object shall contain a Session Description template and a list of the transmitted UDP flows to be forwarded on the established MBMS bearer for the session. For each list entry, the content provider shall indicate whether a) this UDP flow is directly associated with a media description entry in the Session Description Template – i.e., an "m=" line is present in the template and which contains a port field, or b) this UDP flow is related to a media description entry – e.g., it corresponds to an RTCP flow affiliated with the RTP flow as described by the RTP/AVP profile). If the flow is directly associated with a media description entry, then the BM-SC shall modify the port field of the media description entry in the Session Description Template. If the flow is related to a media description entry, then the BM-SC shall simply forward the flow onto a port whose value is equal to the port of the related media session plus an offset.
Note the BM-SC may get input on session properties from the content provider, e.g. bitrate, depending on the ingest session.
| | +|--|--|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| + +| | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|--------|----------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------| +| userplane-delivery-mode-configuration | string | – None – | Forward-only |This property defines how the session needs to be delivered to the application, i.e. it basically establishes the delivery mode.
Mode Enumeration: Specifies the delivery mode.
Forward-only: The BM-SC receives complete IP Multicast packets for to be forwarded. The Content Provider will create the IP multicast packets.
Proxy: The BM-SC proxies the incoming UDP payloads to the outgoing UDP payloads. The BM-SC will create the IP multicast packets.
Only applicable if the Session Type is set to "Transport-Mode".
| Transport | +| delivery-session-description-parameters | string | | |The contents of this property depend on the setting of the Session Announcement Mode property. If Session Announcement Mode is set to "Content Provider", then at minimum the following session parameters shall be provided by the BM-SC:
TMGI of the MBMS Bearer
For Receive Only Mode service, the TMGI shall be allocated from the range specified in 3GPP TS 24.116 [25]. Note that additional session parameters may be provided, based on the configuration options of the delivery method set to "Transport-Mode".
Only applicable if the Session Type is set to "Transport-Mode".
| Transport | +| sdp-url | string | – None – | "" |A URL to the SDP that describes the streaming session between the Content Provider and the BM-SC, which will be used for BM-SC ingestion of the streaming session via xMB-U. The SDP shall include the RTSP links for every media session as part of the "a=control" attribute to enable RTSP control of the session. The SDP shall also contain the required bitrate for each of the media sessions.
The content shall conform to the constraints of this specification.
Only applicable if the Session Type is set to "Streaming".
| RTPStreaming | + +| | | | | | | +|---------------------|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| time-shifting | number | second | 0 | Indicates if and for how long time shifting access to the content (using unicast) may be provided for this session.The application entry point refers to an MPD when Application Service Description pertains to DASH.
When the Ingest Mode is set to Push, the MPD URL refers to a DASH MPD which should be fetched, optionally conditioned, and then inserted into Service Announcement.
When the Ingest Mode is set to Pull, then the BM-SC will fetch the Segments using unicast.
Note that if not set to a valid URL, the session will not be started.
| ApplicationPush,When the Session Type is set to "Application":
A resource locator for ingesting Media Segments using HTTP via xMB-U. The Content Provider may create additional sub-resources using WebDAV procedures.
This is a read-only property managed by the BM-SC and only present when Ingest Mode is set to Push
This property is mandatory if the Session type is set to "Application" and Ingest Mode is set to Push.
When the Session Type is set to Files:
A resource locator for ingesting content using HTTP via xMB-U.
This is a read-only property managed by the BM-SC and only present when Ingest Mode is set to Push.
| ApplicationPush,Indicator whether the content is also available for unicast retrieval.
Only applicable if the Session Type is set to "Application".
| ApplicationPush,List of files to be sent.
In the Push mode, the file list is not used since the BM-SC will monitor its push folder and send the files it receives on a first-come first-served basis.
In Pull mode, the file list contains the following information per file entry:
file URL: the URL to the file the BM-SC will use to fetch the content
file display URL: The URL to the file as seen by the UE
byte-range (optional): If present and set to "true", indicates that the HTTP(S) URL given in the file display URL parameter can be used for Byte-Range-Based file repair (subclause 9.3 of 3GPP TS 26.346 [3]) otherwise file display URL parameter should not be used for Byte-Range-Based file repair
e-tag (optional): represents the value of the ETag as defined in IETF RFC 7232 [38] which may also serve as the version identifier for the file in the Byte-Range-Based file repair requests. The ETag should only be supplied by the 3rd party content provider if it is expected that it is different from the one provided over xMB-U when fetching the file.
file earliest fetch time: The BM-SC shall fetch the file no sooner than this UTC timestamp. If absent, then the file shall be present on the Content Provider server and the BM-SC may fetch it at a time of its choosing.
file latest fetch time: The BM-SC shall fetch the file no later than this UTC timestamp. If absent, then the file shall be present on the Content Provider server and
| FilePull,the BM-SC may fetch it at a time of its choosing.
file size (optional): The Content Provider may provide the precise or a file size estimate as input. The BM-SC may update the file size once it has started to fetch the file.
file status: Enumeration stating the state of the file. Possible values are pending, fetched, prepared, transmitting, sent.
Target reception completion time (on the MBMS Client): hint on the deadline by which target time the file should be completely received by the UE. The BM-SC should schedule and order the transmission accordingly.
Keep Updated Interval: The BM-SC checks the file resources with the given interval for changes.
Unicast availability: Indication that the file is also available for unicast retrieval by the application at a Content Provider server whose location is given by the HTTP(S) URL corresponding to the value of "file display URL".
File repetition: The number of times the file shall be sent on the session (a value of 1 means the file shall be sent only once). This counter shall be decreased by one each time the file has been transmitted. When the counter reaches zero the file will cease to be delivered. The BM-SC may send FEC instead of source information.
Note that the expected behavior is that the BM-SC will first send all files in the order of the File List, then decrement the file repetition counter for each file, and subsequently retransmit the list again (only files with counter > 0 are transmitted). This is repeated until all repetitions are completed, or the session stop time has elapsed, whichever event occurring first.
Periodic update interval: When present, it is an indication that
| | +|--|--|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| + +| | | | | | | +|---------------------------------|--------|------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| | | | | this file of the list of files is expected to be periodically updated, and the value of this parameter represents the nominally expected time interval between successive updates of this file. This parameter is a signal to the BM-SC to deliver the file and its updates as a Datacasting service. From its value, the BM-SC will choose the delivery mode ('scheduled-and-periodic' or 'back-to-back'), and set the associated interval and @mode values in controlling the transmission of the Datacasting service. | | +| file-delivery-manifest-url | string | None | "" | Alternative to the file list for describing file properties and delivery requirements. The resource may additionally describe scheduling information for the file.GW's IPv4 address for Source Specific Multicasting.
MBMS GW IPv6 SSM address: Contains the value of MBMS-GW's IPv6 address for Source Specific Multicasting.
Common Tunnel Endpoint Identifier: Indicates the common tunnel endpoint identifier of MBMS GW for user plane.
BM-SC IPv4 address: Indicates the destination IPv4 address of the BM-SC for the reception of user plane data via the xMB-U interface.
BM-SC IPv6 address: Indicates the destination IPv6 address of the BM-SC for the reception of user plane data via the xMB-U interface.
BM-SC port: Indicates the destination UDP port of the BM-SC for the reception of user plane data via the xMB-U interface.
| | +| group-ids | array | None | Empty list |This parameter contains a list of group identifiers, applicable if the service-announcement-mode is set to "SACH".
It is used by the BM-SC in the service announcement for identifying UE belonging to a group.
| GroupContentDelivery | +| mc-extension | object | | |If the MCExtension feature is supported, the Content Provider may request the BM-SC to activate an MBMS bearer with a specific QoS. If so, the Content Provider shall provide the following QoS properties in the session modification operation, to be used by the BM-SC within the QoS-Information AVP during the MBMS Session start procedure (3GPP TS 29.061 [20]):
gbr: Guaranteed bitrate for the MBMS session in unit kbps. The BM-SC shall use this value for the Guaranteed-Bitrate-DL AVP. The difference between the max-ingest-bitrate and gbr can be used by the BM-SC as a budget for FEC.
qci: QoS Class identifier. The BM-SC shall use this value for the QoS-Class-Identifier AVP.
| MCExtension | + +| | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | | | |arp-priority-level: the BM-SC shall use this value for the Priority-Level AVP within the Allocation-Retention-Priority AVP.
arp-pre-emption-capability: the BM-SC shall use this value for the Pre-emption-Capability AVP within the Allocation-Retention-Priority AVP.
arp-pre-emption-vulnerability: the BM-SC shall use this value for the Pre-emption-Vulnerability AVP within the Allocation-Retention-Priority AVP.
If the Content Provider includes the mc-extension property during the session modification operation, the BM-SC shall return the following property in the session retrieval operation:
tmgi: the TMGI of the MBMS session, as returned by the MBMS Session start procedure in 3GPP TS 29.061 [20], the encoding of TMGI is specified in 3GPP TS 24.008 [37], from octet 3 to 8.
| | +|NOTE 1: Properties marked with a supported feature are applicable as described in subclause 9.
NOTE 2: FileRepair feature is only applicable for byte-range and e-tag properties.
Enumeration with the following values (may be expanded in the future):
Critical, Warning, Information, Service, Session. The message classes bear the following meaning:
Critical: When some event drastically prevent the proper delivery of content
Warning: When the service can be partially delivered but quality is reduced
Information: When the service is properly delivered but some interesting event occurred
Session/Service: Information about Service/Session related parameters
Table 5.2.4.1-x shows the information that can be notified for each of the message classes.
| +| message-name | string |Unique identifier of the message. Provides information about the message pertaining to the message-class of the notification
Table 5.2.4.1-2 shows the information that can be notified for each of the message classes and message names.
| +| Message-information | object |A dictionary of key values containing informations linked to the notification.
Every message-information dictionary shall include the following two keys:
date: The value of this key contains the UTC timestamp (in ms) of the date of the event
source: The value of this key is hierarchical colon separated format of services and sessions with the format "service-resource-identifier session-resource-identifier". If the notification is for a service, only the service-resource-identifier shall be included in this value. An empty value for this key shall represent a system wide notification.
Table 5.2.4.1-x shows the additional key value pairs that can be included in the message-information for each of the message-class and message-name.
| + +Table 5.2.4.1-2 shows the notification details that can be sent for each of the message classes. + +**Table 5.2.4.1-2: Notification Details for different message classes** + +| Message Class | Possible Message Name | Additional Key Value Pairs in message-information dictionary | +|----------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Critical | network-is-down | None | +| | service-badly-configured | bad-or-missing-parameters: [Configuration and reporting of monitoring events
This feature is applicable to from an SCEF with CIR/CIA command pair and the reporting of events to the SCEF with RIR/RIA command pair.
If the MME/SGSN does not support this feature, the SCEF shall not send monitoring event configurations to the HSS within CIR.
| +| 1 | NIDD | O |Support of Non-IP Data service over T6a/b
This feature is applicable to CMR/CMA, ODR/ODA and TDR/TDA command pairs.
If the SCEF does not indicate support of this feature in an CMA, the MME or SGSN may store this information and not send any further CMR commands to that SCEF.
| +| 2 | Filtering | O |Filtering Number of UEs present at given location by IMSI-Group
This feature is applicable to the CIR/CIA command pair.
If the MME/SGSN does not support this feature, the SCEF shall interpret the reported number of UEs per location as not being filtered by the provided IMSI-Group-Id.
| +| 3 | Extended Reference IDs | O |Extended Reference IDs
This feature is applicable for the CIR/CIA and RIR/RIA command pairs.
If the SCEF detects that the MME/SGSN does not support this feature, it shall refrain from sending CIR commands containing 64-bit long SCEF Reference IDs.
If the MME/SGSN detects that the SCEF does not support this feature, it shall refrain from sending RIR commands containing 64-bit long SCEF Reference IDs.
| +|Feature bit: The order number of the bit within the Supported-Features AVP, e.g. "1".
Feature: A short name that can be used to refer to the bit and to the feature, e.g. "MONTE".
M/O: Defines if the implementation of the feature is mandatory ("M") or optional ("O").
Description: A clear textual description of the feature.
NOTE 1: This mapping effectively gives the equivalent of Special Arrangement to all SIP UAC with access to the I-MGCF.
NOTE 2: It is possible that the P-Asserted-Identity header field includes both a tel URI and a SIP URI. In this case, either the tel URI or the SIP URI with user="phone" and a specific host portion, as selected by operator policy, may be used.
NOTE 3: The "From" header may contain an "Anonymous User Identity". An "Anonymous User Identity" includes information that does not point to the calling party. IETF RFC 3261 recommends that the display-name component contain "Anonymous". That the Anonymous User Identity will take the form defined in TS 23.003 [74]. The Anonymous User Identity indicates that the calling party desired anonymity. The From header may also contain an Unavailable User Identity as defined in TS 23.003 [74], that indicates that the calling party is unknown.
NOTE 4: A national option exists to set the APRI to "Address not available".
NOTE 5: TS 24.229 [9] guarantees that the received number is an E.164 number formatted as an international number, with a "+" sign as prefix.
NOTE 6: The E.164 numbers considered within the present document are composed by a Country Code (CC), followed by a National Destination Code (NDC), followed by a Subscriber Number (SN). On the IMS side, the numbers are international public telecommunication numbers ("CC"+"NDC"+"SN") and are prefixed by a "+" sign. On the CS side, it is a network option to omit the CC.
NOTE 7: This is an ETSI specific value described within ETSI EN 300 356-1 [70].
| | | | | | + +**Table 4: Setting of the network-provided BICC/ISUP calling party number parameter with a CLI (network option)** + +| BICC/ISUP CgPN Parameter field | Value | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Screening Indicator | " network provided " | +| Number Incomplete Indicator | " complete " | +| Number Plan Indicator | ISDN/Telephony (E.164) | +| Address Presentation Restricted Indicator | Presentation allowed/restrictedIf the Number Portability Database Dip Indicator is present, and there is no Number Portability Routing Number, set to "number portability query done for called number, non-ported called subscriber".
If the Number Portability Database Dip Indicator is present, and a Number Portability Routing Number is present, set to "number portability query done for called number, ported called subscriber".
If there is no Number Portability Database Dip Indicator, set to "number portability query not done for called number"
| + +### 7.2.3.1.2B Coding of the IAM for Carrier Routeing + +This clause describes optional coding procedures for carrier-based routeing. The interworking of the CIC parameter is defined. + +#### 7.2.3.1.2B.1 Coding of the IAM when a Carrier Identification Code (CIC) is present + +The procedures followed in clause 7.2.3.1.2.1 apply with the following addition. + +Based on network configuration, if the tel-URI parameter in a tel-URI or the userinfo part of a SIP URI with user=phone in the Request-URI of an initial INVITE request, contains a "cic=" parameter, as defined in IETF RFC 4694 [93], the I-MGCF may extract the carrier identification code from the "cic=" field for routeing the call. If the outgoing IAM message contains the Transit Network Selection (TNS) parameter, as defined in ITU-T Q.763 [4], based on network configuration the TNS may be populated using the carrier identification code from the "cic=" field. The format of the "cic" parameter (e.g. global-cic and local-cic) shall be compliant to IETF RFC 4694 [93]. + +#### 7.2.3.1.2B.2 Void + +### 7.2.3.1.3 Sending of COT + + + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Client + participant I-MGCF + Note left of Client: SDP indicating preconditions met and/or active media + Client->>I-MGCF: + I-MGCF->>COT: + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing the sending of COT. A box on the left contains 'SDP indicating preconditions met and/or active media'. An arrow points from this box to a vertical line labeled 'I-MGCF'. From the I-MGCF line, an arrow points to a box labeled 'COT'. + +**Figure 5: Sending of COT** + +If the IAM has already been sent, the Continuity message shall be sent indicating "continuity check successful", when all of the following conditions have been met: + +- The requested remote preconditions (if any) in the IMS network have been met. +- The media stream previously set to inactive mode is set to active (as specified in IETF RFC 4566 [56]). + +- Local preconditions have been fulfilled. +- A possible outstanding continuity check procedure is successfully performed on the outgoing circuit. + +### 7.2.3.1.3A Sending of SAM + +#### 7.2.3.1.3A.1 General + +The procedures in the present clause are only applicable if the I-MGCF supports the network option of overlap signalling, using either the in-dialog method or the multiple INVITEs method. Within one IMS only a single of those methods shall be used. + +After the ISUP IAM message has been sent the I-MGCF can receive additional digits. The additional digits may either, as a network option, be received in: + +- in-dialog SIP INFO requests ("legacy" mode of usage of the INFO method as defined in IETF RFC 6086 [133]), in-dialog method as specified in clause 7.2.3.1.3A.2 or +- in additional SIP INVITE requests, multiple INVITEs method as specified in 7.2.3.1.3A.3. + + + +``` + +graph LR + A[SIP message carrying additional digits] --> I-MGCF + I-MGCF --> SAM + SAM --> B[ ] + style B fill:none,stroke:none + +``` + +Diagram illustrating the sending of SAM. A box labeled 'SIP message carrying additional digits' has an arrow pointing to a vertical line representing the I-MGCF. From the I-MGCF, an arrow points to a box labeled 'SAM', which then has an arrow pointing to the right. + +**Figure 5a: Sending of SAM** + +#### 7.2.3.1.3A.2 Additional digits received in in-dialog SIP INFO requests + +If interworking of overlap signalling using the in-dialog method is supported by the I-MGCF, the ISUP IAM message has already been sent, but no ISUP ACM or REL message has been received, and a SIP INFO request carrying additional digits is received, then the I-MGCF shall generate a SAM and pass it to outgoing BICC/ISUP procedures. The SAM shall contain in its Subsequent Number parameter only the additional digits received in this SIP INFO request. + +#### 7.2.3.1.3A.3 Additional digits received in SIP INVITE requests + +If interworking of overlap signalling using the multiple INVITEs method is supported by the I-MGCF, the ISUP IAM message has already been sent, but no ISUP ACM or REL message has been received, and the I-MGCF receives an INVITE with the same Call-ID and From tag as a previous INVITE which was associated with a BICC/ISUP call/bearer control instance currently existing on the BICC/ISUP side, then: + +- If the number of digits in the Request-URI is greater than the number of digits already received for the communication, the I-MGCF shall generate a SAM and pass it to outgoing BICC/ISUP procedures. The SAM shall contain in its Subsequent Number parameter only the additional digits received in this Request-URI compared with the digits already received for the communication. The I-MGCF shall reply to any earlier INVITE with a 484 Address Incomplete response if this has not already been done. +- If the number of digits in the Request-URI is equal or less than the number of digits already received for the communication, then the I-MGCF shall immediately send a 484 Address Incomplete response for this INVITE. In this case, no SAM shall be sent to BICC/ISUP procedures. + + + +Sequence diagram for Figure 5b showing multiple overlapping INVITE messages. A box at the top represents the caller. Below it are three stacked black rectangles representing the callee's processing. Arrows point from the caller to each of the three rectangles, indicating multiple INVITE requests. Arrows also point from each rectangle back towards the caller, representing responses or processing steps. + +**Figure 5b: Receipt of subsequent INVITE for multiple INVITEs method overlap signalling** + +On sending of a 484 Address Incomplete message for an INVITE transaction, the I-MGCF considers any offer/answer exchange initiated by the INVITE to be terminated. The new INVITE initiates a new offer/answer exchange. However, if resources have already been reserved and they can be reused within the new offer/answer exchange, the precondition signalling shall reflect the current status of the affected preconditions. + +**7.2.3.1.4 Sending of 180 ringing** + +**7.2.3.1.4.0 General** + +The I-MGCF shall send the SIP 180 Ringing response when receiving any of the following messages: + +- ACM with Called party's status indicator set to subscriber free. + + + +Sequence diagram for Figure 6 showing the receipt of ACM. A vertical line represents the I-MGCF. An arrow labeled 'ACM (Subscriber Free)' points from the right towards the I-MGCF line. From the I-MGCF line, two arrows point to the left: a solid arrow labeled '180 Ringing' and a dashed arrow labeled 'P-Early-Media (1)'. Below these, another dashed arrow points left, labeled 'Ring tone'. + +**Figure 6: The receipt of ACM** + +**NOTE:** Whether the P-Early-Media header field is included depends on whether the received INVITE contains a P-Early-Media header field with the "supported" parameter as described in IETF RFC 5009 [89] or based on local policy. + +- CPG with Event indicator set to alerting + + + +I-MGCF + +Diagram showing the receipt of CPG (Alerting) by the I-MGCF. A vertical line represents the I-MGCF. To the left, '180 Ringing' and 'P-Early-Media (1)' are shown with a solid arrow pointing left. To the right, 'CPG (Alerting)' is shown with a solid arrow pointing left towards the I-MGCF. Below the I-MGCF line, a dashed line extends to the left, labeled 'Ring tone'. + +NOTE: Whether the P-Early-Media header field is included depends on whether the received INVITE contains a P-Early-Media header field with the "supported" parameter as described in IETF RFC 5009 [89] or based on local policy. + +**Figure 7: Receipt of CPG (Alerting)** + +For a speech call that is not identified as an "ICS call" as specified in clause 7.2.3.1.2.12, if the INVITE request includes the P-Early-Media header field, the I-MGCF shall include in the SIP 180 Ringing response a P-Early-Media header field authorizing backward early media, except when + +- the I-MGCF has already sent a reliable provisional response (see IETF RFC 3262 [54]) including a P-Early-Media header, as defined in IETF RFC 5009 [89], and +- the most recently sent P-Early-Media header field authorized backward early media. + +NOTE: If the I-MGCF signals the P-Early-Media header field authorizing backward early media, then the IMS can expect tones or announcements to the calling party to flow from the CS network via an MGW controlled by the I-MGCF. In particular, once the I-MGCF sends the 180 Ringing response, ringback is expected in media from the CS network. + +If the INVITE request doesn't include the P-Early-Media header field with the "supported" parameter and if the speech call is not identified as the "ICS call" as specified in clause 7.2.3.1.2.12, then as a network option the I-MGCF may include in the SIP 180 Ringing response a P-Early-Media header field authorizing backward early media. + +As a network option, an I-MGCF may generate a Call-Info header field, or an Alert-Info header field according to rules and procedures of IETF RFC 3261 [19] to provide media instead of the in-band media received from the PSTN. + +For the speech call identified as the "ICS call" as specified in clause 7.2.3.1.2.12, if the I-MGCF has received the P-Early-Media header field in the initial INVITE request, the I-MGCF shall include in the SIP 180 Ringing response the P-Early-Media header field indicating the backward early media is not authorised, except when: + +- the I-MGCF has already sent a reliable provisional response (see IETF RFC 3262 [54]) including a P-Early-Media header, as defined in IETF RFC 5009 [89]; and +- the most recently sent P-Early-Media header field did not authorize the backward early media. + +If the P-Early-Media header field with the "supported" parameter was not included in the initial INVITE request, then as a network option the I-MGCF may include in the SIP 180 Ringing response the P-Early-Media header field indicating the backward early media is not authorised for the "ICS call". + +#### 7.2.3.1.4.0a PSTN XML body + +The procedures in the present clause apply only if the I-MGCF supports the PSTN XML body as a network option. The I-MGCF shall map the Access Transport parameter received in the CPG or ACM into PSTN XML elements as shown in table 7a.0f and include this PSTN XML body in the 180 Ringing. + +**Table 7a.0f: Mapping of ISUP ATP Parameter into PSTN XML elements** + +| 18x | CPG or ACM | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| PSTN XML | ISUP Parameter | Content | +| ProgressIndicator | Access Transport Parameter | Progress indicator | +| HighLayerCompatibility (NOTE 2) | | High layer compatibility | +| LowLayerCompatibility (NOTE 2) | | Low layer compatibility | +| BearerCapability (NOTE 1, NOTE 2) | | Bearer Capability | +| BearerCapability (NOTE 1, NOTE 2) | Transmission medium used parameter (NOTE 1) | | +| NOTE 1: see clause 7.2.3.1.4.1 Transmission Medium Used parameter (TMU) | | | +| NOTE 2: The I-MGCF shall only provide this IE if it interworks media encoded in any of the formats in table 2a (G.711, Clearmode, or t38) without transcoding. If both TMU and a BC in the ATP have been received, the BC in the ATP shall be mapped. | | | + +The I-MGCF shall map a possibly available "ProgressIndicator" element in the ATP parameter within the ACM or CPG into a Progress Indicator in the PSTN XML body of the 180 Ringing. In addition, the I-MGCF shall map the Backward call indicators parameter and the Optional backward call indicators parameter (if present) within the ACM or CPG into other ProgressIndicator(s) in the PSTN XML body of the 180 Ringing as shown in table 7a.0g. + +NOTE: The order of ProgressIndicators within the same PSTN XML body is irrelevant. + +**Table 7a.0g: Mapping of ISUP BCI and optional BCI parameters into PSTN XML ProgressIndicator** + +| ← 180 Ringing | ←ACM or CPG | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| PSTN XML body with ProgressIndicator with "Progress Description" value No (Value of PI) | Backward call indicators parameter
SIP |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| As determined by BICC/ISUP procedure. | COT received with the Continuity Indicators parameter set to " continuity check failed " (ISUP only) or the BICC/ISUP timer T8 expires. | CANCEL or BYE according to the rules described in this subclause. |
+| REL with cause value 47 (resource unavailable, unspecified). | Internal resource reservation unsuccessful | As determined by SIP procedure |
+| As determined by BICC/ISUP procedure. | BICC/ISUP procedures result in generation of autonomous REL on BICC/ISUP side. | CANCEL or BYE according to the rules described in this subclause. |
+| Depending on the SIP release reason. | SIP procedures result in a decision to release the call. | As determined by SIP procedure. |
+
+#### 7.2.3.2.17 Special handling of 580 precondition failure received in response to either an INVITE or UPDATE
+
+A 580 Precondition failure response may be received as a response either to an INVITE or to an UPDATE request.
+
+##### 7.2.3.2.17.1 580 Precondition failure response to an INVITE
+
+Release with cause code as indicated in table 18 is sent immediately to the BICC/ISUP network.
+
+##### 7.2.3.2.17.2 580 Precondition failure response to an UPDATE within an early dialog
+
+A BYE request is sent for the early dialog within which the UPDATE was sent.
+
+If all the early dialogs that were generated from the INVITE request have answered the respective UPDATE request with 580 Precondition failure response then the O-MGCF shall send the Release message with Cause Code '127 Interworking' to the ISUP network.
+
+### 7.2.3.2.18 Sending of CANCEL
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the O-MGCF's response to a failure. A horizontal arrow labeled "COT (failure)" points from the left towards a vertical line representing the O-MGCF. From the O-MGCF, a horizontal arrow labeled "CANCEL" points to the right.
+
+Diagram showing the receipt of a COT (failure) message by the O-MGCF and the subsequent sending of a CANCEL message.
+
+**Figure 23: Receipt of COT (failure)**
+
+CANCEL shall be sent if the Continuity message is received with the Continuity Indicators parameter set to "*continuity check failed*" or the ISUP (or BICC) timer T8 expires.
+
+A Reason header field containing the (Q.850) Cause Value 41 Temporary Failure shall be added to the CANCEL request to be sent by the SIP side of the O-MGCF.
+
+### 7.2.3.2.19 Receipt of SIP redirect (3xx) response
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the O-MGCF's response to a SIP redirect. A horizontal arrow points from a box labeled "SIP response code 3xx" towards a vertical line representing the O-MGCF. From the O-MGCF, a horizontal arrow labeled "REL (Cause value 127)" points to the left.
+
+Diagram showing the receipt of a SIP response code 3xx by the O-MGCF and the subsequent sending of a REL (Cause value 127) message.
+
+**Figure 24: Receipt of SIP response code 3xx**
+
+When receiving a SIP response with a response code 3xx, the default behaviour of the O-MGCF is to release the call with a cause code value 127 (Interworking unspecified).
+
+NOTE: The O-MGCF may also decide for example to redirect the call towards the URIs in the Contact header field of the response as an operator option, but such handling is outside of the scope of the present document.
+
+### 7.2.3.2.20 Sending of INFO for overlap signalling using the in-dialog method
+
+#### 7.2.3.2.20.1 General
+
+SIP INFO request ("legacy" mode of usage of the INFO method as defined in IETF RFC 6086 [133]) is used to carry additional digits when overlap signalling is sent using the in-dialog method as described in clause 7.2.3.2.1a.2, which is a network option. Clause 7.2.3.2.1a.2 also describes when the O-MGCF sends a SIP INFO request.
+
+#### 7.2.3.2.20.2 Encoding of the INFO
+
+Table 18b provides a summary of how the header fields within the outgoing INFO messages are populated when in-dialog SIP INFO requests are used for overlap dialling.
+
+**Table 18b: Interworked contents of the INFO message**
+
+| SAM→ | INFO→ |
+|--------|-----------------------------------|
+| Digits | See TS 24.229 [9] clause 7.12.1.2 |
+
+### 7.2.3.3 Timers
+
+**Table 19: Timers for interworking**
+
+| Symbol | Time-out value | Cause for initiation | Normal termination | At expiry | Reference |
+|--------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
+| Ti/w1 | 4 s to 6 sIf the priv-value "history" or "session" or "header" is received within the Privacy header field or the priv-value "history" is received within the "headers" component of the hi-targeted-to-uri representing the diverting URI(s) and within the hi-targeted-to-uri representing diverted-to URI then "presentation not allowed" shall be set.
Otherwise, if the priv-value "history" is received only within the "headers" component of the hi-targeted-to-uri representing the diverted-to URI then "presentation allowed without redirection number" shall be set. (NOTE 1, NOTE 2)
Otherwise, "presentation allowed with redirection number" shall be set.
| +| hi-targeted-to-uri; Reason "headers" component as defined in IETF RFC 7044 [91] with cause parameter | Cause parameter value | Redirecting reason | | +| | 302 | | Deflection immediate response | +| | 486 | | User busy | +| | 408 | | No reply | +| | 503 | | Mobile subscriber not reachable | +| | all other cause values | | Unknown | + +NOTE 1: diverting URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the hi-entry containing a hi-index value that match the "mp" header field parameter value of the diverted-to URI. If the diverted-to URI does not contain the "mp" header field parameter, the diverting URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the last hi-entry containing a Reason "headers" component with cause parameter. + +NOTE 2: diverted-to URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the hi-entry following the last hi-entry containing a Reason "headers" component with cause parameter and is mapped to the Redirection number, see table 7.4.6.2.2.2. + +Table 7.4.6.2.2.5: Void + +Table 7.4.6.2.2.6: Mapping of 181 (Call Is Being Forwarded) © ACM when ACM was not previously sent + +| Source SIP header field and component | Source Component value | ISUP Parameter | Derived value of parameter field | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------| +| 181 (Call Is Being Forwarded) | | ACM | | +| | | Generic notification indicatorIf the priv-value "history" or "session" or "header" is received within the Privacy header field or the priv-value "history" is received within the "headers" component of the hi-targeted-to-uri representing the diverting URI(s) and within the hi-targeted-to-uri representing diverted-to URI then "presentation not allowed" shall be set.
Otherwise, if the priv-value "history" is received only within the "headers" component of the hi-targeted-to-uri representing the diverted-to URI then "presentation allowed without redirection number" shall be set. (NOTE 1, NOTE 2)
Otherwise, "presentation allowed with redirection number" shall be set.
| | +| "cause" URI parameter, as defined in IETF RFC 4458 [113] of the last History-Info hi-entry containing hi-targeted-to-uri with "cause" URI parameter. (NOTE 3) | Cause value | Redirecting reason | | | +| | 404 | | Unknown | | +| | 302 | | Unconditional | | +| | 486 | | User busy | | +| | 408 | | No reply | | +| | 480 | | Deflection immediate response | | +| | 503 | | Mobile subscriber not reachable | | +| | 487 | | Deflection during alerting | | +| NOTE 1: diverting URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the hi-entry containing a hi-index value that match the "mp" header field parameter value of the diverted-to URI. If the diverted-to URI does not contain the "mp" header field parameter, the diverting URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the hi-entry before the last hi-entry containing "cause" URI parameter. | | | | | +| NOTE 2: diverted-to URI corresponds to the hi-targeted-to-uri of the last hi-entry containing "cause" URI parameter and is mapped to the Redirection number, see table 7.5.4.2.1.2. | | | | | +| NOTE 3: The hi-target-param parameter set to "mp" as defined in IETF RFC 7044 [91] indicates that the target of the Request-URI was changed and appears in this hi-targeted-to-uri. In case of interworking with networks not supporting IETF RFC 7044 [91] the "mp" header field parameter may not appear. | | | | | + +Table 7.5.4.2.1.5: Void + +Table 7.5.4.2.1.6: Mapping of 181 (Call Is Being Forwarded) $\leftarrow$ ACM if no ACM was sent before + +| Source SIP header field and component | Source Component value | ISUP Parameter | Derived value of parameter field | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------| +| 181 (Call Is Being Forwarded) | | ACM | | +| | | Generic notification indicatorIf a dtx-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If no dtx parameter is included in the SDP answer and if the reception of DTX is not desired, the MGCF shall include in the SDP answer the dtx-recv parameter with a value 0.
If both the dtx and dtx-recv parameters are included, those parameters shall have the same value; however, inclusion of the dtx-recv parameter is not required if the dtx parameter is included.
If the MGCF supplies the dtx-recv parameter in the SDP answer, it should also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| br (NOTE 1) |If a br parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send and receive direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, and shall include the br parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise, if the MGCF desires the same bit rate range for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the bit rate range to match IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, the MGCF shall supply the br parameter in the SDP answer it sends. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include this parameter in the SDP answer.
If the MGCF also supplies the bw, bw-send or bw-recv parameter, the value of the br parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters.
If the MGCF supplies the br parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the br parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| + +| | | | +|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| br-send (NOTE 1) |If a br-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the receive direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br-recv value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, and the MGCF shall include the br-send parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer.
Otherwise, if the MGCF desires a different bit rate (range) for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the bit rate range for the send direction to match IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, it shall supply the br-send parameter in the SDP answer it sends.
Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-send parameter in the SDP answer.
If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-send parameter, the value of the br-send parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters.
If the MGCF supplies the br-send parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the br-send parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| br-recv (NOTE 1) |If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br-send value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, and the MGCF shall include the br-recv parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer.
Otherwise, if the MGCF desires a different bit rate (range) for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the bit rate range for the receive direction to match IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies, it shall supply the br-recv parameter in the SDP answer it sends.
Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-recv parameter in the answer.
If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-recv parameter, the value of the br-recv parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters.
If the MGCF supplies the br-recv parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the br-recv parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| + +| | | | +|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| bw (NOTE 1) |If a bw parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidth(s), or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send and receive direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidth(s), and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a bw parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidth value, which is either the received bw value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, and the MGCF shall include the bw parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise, if the MGCF desires the same sampling bandwidth(s) for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the sampling bandwidth(s) to match IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, the MGCF shall supply the bw parameter in the SDP answer it sends. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include this parameter in the answer. If the MGCF also supplies the br, br-send or br-recv parameter, the value of the bw parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the bw parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the bw parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| bw-send (NOTE 1) |If a bw-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidths, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the receive direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidths, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a bw-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidths value, which is either the received bw-recv value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, and the MGCF shall include the bw-send parameter with the selected value in the SDP answer. Otherwise, if the MGCF desires a different sampling bandwidths for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the sampling bandwidths for the send direction to match IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, the MGCF shall supply the bw-send parameter in the SDP answer it sends. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-send parameter in the SDP answer. If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-send parameter, the value of the br-send parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the bw-send parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the bw-send parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| + +| | | | +|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| bw-recv (NOTE 1) |If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidths, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidths, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward the bw-recv parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a bw-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidths value, which is either the received bw-send value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, and the MGCF shall include the bw-recv parameter with the selected value in the SDP answer. Otherwise, if the MGCF desires a different sampling bandwidths for the send and receive direction in EVS primary mode, and wants to restrict the sampling bandwidths for the receive direction to match IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies, and the bw range of other codecs to transcode with, the MGCF shall supply the bw-recv parameter in the SDP answer it sends. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the bw-recv parameter in the SDP answer. If the MGCF also supplies the br or br-recv parameter, the value of the bw-recv parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the bw-send parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| cmr (NOTE 1) |If a cmr parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a cmr parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the cmr parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer. Otherwise, if the IM-MGW desires to disable codec mode requests within the RTP payload of the EVS primary mode (due to the IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies), it shall include the cmr parameter with value -1 in the SDP answer it sends. If the MGCF supplies the cmr parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| ch-aw-recv (NOTE 1) |If a ch-aw-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated mode in the send direction. If the indicated mode is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If the MGCF it desires to control the channel-aware mode of EVS in the receive direction, e.g. to disable it with value -1, it shall include the ch-aw-recv parameter in the SDP offer and shall also supply the ch-aw-recv parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. The MGCF shall consider the capabilities of the IM-MGW when it chooses an appropriate value.
| + +| | | | +|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| number of channels (NOTE 2) | If a "number of channels" parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a "number of channels" parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the "number of channels" parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer and shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| ch-send (NOTE 1) | If a ch-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels in the receive direction. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward the ch-send parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a ch-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the ch-send parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer and shall also supply the ch-send parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| ch-recv (NOTE 1) | If a ch-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels in the send direction. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type for transcoding, the MGCF shall forward the ch-recv parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a ch-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the ch-recv parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer and shall also supply the ch-recv parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| mode-set (NOTE 3) | If a mode-set parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a mode-set parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the mode-set parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer.If a br parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send and receive direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the CS configuration received Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5), and shall include the br parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise, the MGCF shall include the br parameter in the SDP answer and shall set it to a range corresponding to the CS configuration received in the Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5). If the MGCF also supplies the bw, bw-send or bw-recv parameter, the value of the br parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. The MGCF shall also supply the br parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| +| br-send (NOTE 1) |If a br-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the receive direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br-recv value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the br parameter value included in the SDP answer, and the MGCF shall include the br-send parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-send parameter in the SDP answer. If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-send parameter, the value of the br-send parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters.
| +| br-recv (NOTE 1) |If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated bit rates, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send direction. If the indicated bit rates, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor.
|If a br-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a bit rate value, which is either the received br-send value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the br parameter value included in the SDP answer, and the MGCF shall include the br-recv parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-recv parameter in the answer. If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-recv parameter, the value of the br-recv parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the br-recv parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the br-recv parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value.
| + +| | | | +|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| bw (NOTE 1) | If a bw parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidth(s), or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send and receive direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidth(s), and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a bw parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidth value, which is either the received bw value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the CS configuration received in the Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5), and the MGCF shall include the bw parameter with the selected value that is also supplied towards the IM-MGW in the SDP answer. Otherwise the MGCF shall include the bw parameter in the SDP answer and shall set it to a range corresponding to the CS configuration received in the Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5). If the MGCF also supplies the br, br-send or br-recv parameter, the value of the bw parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. The MGCF shall also supply the bw parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| bw-send (NOTE 1) | If a bw-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidths, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the receive direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidths, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a bw-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidths value, which is either the received bw-recv value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the bw parameter value included in the SDP answer, and the MGCF shall include the bw-send parameter with the selected value in the SDP answer. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the br-send parameter in the SDP answer. If the MGCF also supplies the bw or bw-send parameter, the value of the br-send parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the bw-send parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply to the IM-MGW the bw-send parameter in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| bw-recv (NOTE 1) | If a br-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated sampling bandwidths, or a subset of them, in EVS primary mode in the send direction. If the indicated sampling bandwidths, and even each subset of them, are not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, it shall forward the bw-recv parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a bw-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall select a sampling bandwidths value, which is either the received bw-send value or a subset of it, based on IM-MGW capabilities, possible configured policies and the bw parameter value included in the SDP answer, and the MGCF shall include the bw-recv parameter with the selected value in the SDP answer. Otherwise the MGCF shall not include the bw-recv parameter in the SDP answer. If the MGCF also supplies the br or br-recv parameter, the value of the bw-recv parameter shall be compatible with the values of those parameters. If the MGCF supplies the bw-send parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | + +| | | | +|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| cmr (NOTE 1) | If a cmr parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. |If a cmr parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the cmr parameter with unmodified value in the SDP answer.
Otherwise, if the IM-MGW desires to disable codec mode requests within the RTP payload of the EVS primary mode (due to the IM-MGW capabilities and possible configured policies), it shall include the cmr parameter with value -1 in the SDP answer.
Otherwise the MGCF shall include the cmr parameter with a value of 1 in the SDP answer.
The MGCF shall also supply the cmr parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer.
| +| ch-aw-recv (NOTE 1) | If a ch-aw-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the CS side supports the indicated mode. If the indicated mode is not supported, the MGCF shall set this parameter to -1 and forward it to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If the MGCF desires to control the channel-aware mode of EVS in the receive direction, e.g. to disable it with value -1, it shall include the ch-aw-recv parameter in the SDP offer and shall also supply the ch-aw-recv parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. The MGCF shall consider the capabilities of the IM-MGW when it chooses an appropriate value. | +| number of channels (NOTE 2) | If a "number of channels" parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | The MGCF shall include the "number of channels" parameter with a value of 1 in the SDP answer and shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| ch-send (NOTE 1) | If a ch-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels in the receive direction. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward the ch-send parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a ch-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the ch-send parameter with a value of 1 in the SDP answer and shall also supply the ch-send parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| ch-recv (NOTE 1) | If a ch-recv parameter is contained in the SDP offer the MGCF shall check if the IM-MGW supports the indicated number of channels in the send direction. If the indicated number of channels is not supported, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. If the MGCF selects the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward the ch-recv parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a ch-send parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the ch-recv parameter with a value of 1 value in the SDP answer and shall also supply the ch-recv parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | + +| | | | +|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| mode-set (NOTE 3) | If a mode-set parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the mode-set parameter does not include mode set 0, the MGCF shall not select the EVS payload type. Otherwise, if a mode-set parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the mode-set parameter includes mode set 0 and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | If a mode-set parameter is contained in the SDP offer, the MGCF shall include the mode-set parameter with a value which is either the received mode-set parameter value or a subset of it, based on the CS configuration received in the Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5), in the SDP answer. Otherwise, the MGCF shall include the mode-set parameter in the SDP answer and shall set it to the range corresponding to the CS configuration received in the Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5). The MGCF shall also supply the mode-set parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer. | +| mode-change-period (NOTE 3) | If a mode-change-period parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | The MGCF shall include the mode-change-period parameter in the SDP answer and shall set it as per the received Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5). The MGCF shall also supply the mode-change-period parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer. | +| mode-change-capability (NOTE 3) | If a mode-change-capability (NOTE 4) parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF may forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | The MGCF shall either include the mode-change-capability parameter with a value of 2 or omit it in the SDP answer. The MGCF may also supply the mode-change-capability parameter to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer. | +| mode-change-neighbor (NOTE 3) | If a mode-change-neighbor parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | The MGCF shall include the mode-change-neighbor parameter in the SDP answer and shall set it as per the received Single Codec IE (see subclause B.2.5.5). The MGCF shall also supply the mode-change-neighbor to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer. | +| max-red (NOTE 5) | If a max-red parameter is contained in the SDP offer and the MGCF select the EVS payload type, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW for the termination towards the offerer in the remote descriptor. | The MGCF shall only include the max-red parameter in the SDP answer if it desires to restrict the maximum redundancy of received packets. When selecting the value of the max-red parameter, the MGCF shall consider the capabilities of the IM-MGW. If the MGCF supplies the max-red parameter in the SDP answer, it shall also supply it to the IM-MGW in the local descriptor for the termination towards the offerer with the same value. | +| 3gpp_mtsi_app_adapt (NOTE 4) | If a 3gpp_mtsi_app_adapt SDP attribute is contained in the SDP answer, the MGCF shall forward this parameter to the IM-MGW in the remote descriptor. | If the IM-MGW supports RTCP APP based adaptation messages defined in TS 26.114 [104], and the MGCF has a policy to negotiate the usage of those messages, the MGCF shall include the 3gpp_mtsi_app_adapt SDP attribute indicating the allowed APP messages in the SDP answer. | + +- | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| NOTE 1: This MIME parameter of the EVS RTP payload type is defined in TS 26.445 [147]. It is encapsulated within the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute defined IETF RFC 4566 [56]. | +| NOTE 2: This number of channels are encoded as "encoding parameters" of the SDP "a=rtpmap" attribute defined in IETF RFC 4566 [56]. | +| NOTE 3: This MIME parameter of the EVS RTP payload type relates to EVS AMR-WB IO major operation mode and is defined in IETF RFC 4867 [23]. It is encapsulated within the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute defined IETF RFC 4566 [56]. | +| NOTE 4: This SDP attribute is defined in TS 26.114 [104]. It applies to all codecs offered in an SDP media line. However, some values are specific to EVS. | +| NOTE 5: This MIME parameter of the EVS RTP payload type is defined in IETF RFC 4867 [23]. It is encapsulated within the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute defined IETF RFC 4566 [56]. | +| NOTE 6: The received evs-mode-switch parameter has no influence on the Config-EVS-Code. | + +### 9.2.14 SDP Capability Negotiation (SDPCapNeg) + +The SDP Capability Negotiation (SDPCapNeg) as specified in IETF RFC 5939 [150] is adopted as an optional functionality to negotiate capabilities and their associated configurations according to 3GPP TS 24.229 [9]. + +The requirements and procedures as described in subclause 5.2.3 of 3GPP TS 23.333 [151] for MRFC and MRFP, apply to the MGCF and the IM-MGW when SDPCapNeg is used. + +### 9.2.15 Rate adaptation for media endpoints + +The MGCF and the IM-MGW may support rate adaptation for media endpoints using the enhanced bandwidth negotiation mechanism defined in 3GPP TS 26.114 [104]. + +The requirements and procedures as described in subclause 5.2.5 of 3GPP TS 23.333 [151] for the MRFC and the MRFP, apply to the MGCF and the IM-MGW if the MGCF and the IM-MGW perform media transcoding. + +## 9.3 Mn Signalling procedures + +This clause describes of logical signalling procedures (i.e. message identifiers are not part of the protocol) between the MGCF and IM-MGW. The procedures within this clause are intended to be implemented using the standard H.248 procedure as defined in ITU recommendation H.248.1 [2] with appropriate parameter combinations. + +### 9.3.1 Procedures related to terminations towards the IM CN Subsystem + +A mapping of the procedures defined here to H.248 procedures and parameters is provided in 3GPP TS 29.332 [15]. + +#### 9.3.1.1 Reserve IMS connection point + +This procedure is used to reserve local connection addresses and local resources. + +**Table 25: Procedures toward the IM Subsystem: Reserve IMS connection point** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|----------------------------------|-----------|------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Reserve IMS Connection Point | MGCF | Context/Context Request | M | This information element indicates the existing context or requests a new context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Priority information | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply priority treatment for the terminations and bearer connections in the specified context. | +| | | IMS Termination Request | M | This information element requests a new IMS termination for the bearer to be established. | +| | | Local IMS Resources/ | M | This information element indicates the resource(s) (i.e. codecs) for which the IM-MGW shall be prepared to receive user data, | +| | | IP Interface Type | O | This information element indicates the used interface type | +| | | ReserveValue | O | This information element indicates if multiple local IMS resources are to be reserved. | +| | | Local Connection Addresses Request | M | This information element requests an IP address and port number on the IM-MGW that the remote end can send user plane data to. | +| | | Notify termination heartbeat | M | This information element requests termination heartbeat indications. | +| | | Notify Released Bearer | O | This information element requests a notification of a released bearer. | +| | | IP Realm Identifier | O | This information element indicates the IP realm of the IP termination. | +| | | ECN Enable | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply ECN procedures | +| | | ECN Initiation Method | C | This information element specifies the ECN Initiation method and requests the IM-MGW to perform IP header settings as an ECN endpoint. It may be included only if ECN is enabled. | +| | | Notify ECN Failure Event | C | This information element requests a notification if an ECN failure occurs. It may only be supplied if ECN is enabled. | +| | | Diffserv Code Point | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply a specific Diffserv Code Point to the IP headers. | +| | | ICE password request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE password. | +| | | ICE Ufrag request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE ufrag. | +| | | ICE host candidate request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE host candidate. | +| | | STUN server request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests the IM-MGW to answer STUN connectivity checks for ICE. | +| | | SDPCapNeg configuration | O | This information element provides SDPCapNeg configuration(s) using as "a=acap", "a=tcap", "a=pcfg" and "a=acfg" SDP attributes. | +| Reserve IMS Connection Point Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | IMS Termination | M | This information element indicates the IMS termination where the command was executed. | + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------|-----------|----------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | Local IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resources that the IM-MGW has reserved to receive the user plane data from the IMS. | +| | | Local Connection Addresses | M | This information element indicates the IP address and port on the IM-MGW that shall receive user plane data from IMS. | +| | | ICE password | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE password assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE Ufrag | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE Ufrag assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE host candidate | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE host candidate assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE lite indication | C | This information element shall be present only if an ICE host candidate request was contained in the request, and the IM-MGW supports ICE lite, but not full ICE. It indicates that the IM-MGW only supports ICE lite. | +| | | SDPCapNeg configuration | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It provides SDPCapNeg configuration(s) using as "a=acap", "a=tcap", "a=pcfg" and "a=acfg" SDP attributes. | + +#### 9.3.1.2 Configure IMS resources + +This procedure is used to select multimedia-processing resources for an Mb interface connection. + +**Table 26: Procedures toward the IM Subsystem: Select Local, +Select Remote IMS Processing Resource** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Configure IMS Resources | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the existing context. | +| | | IMS Termination | M | This information element indicates the existing bearer termination. | +| | | Local IMS Resources | O | This information element indicates the resources (i.e. codec) that the IM-MGW may use on the reception of user plane data. | +| | | Remote IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resources (i.e. codec) that the IM-MGW may send user plane data to. | +| | | Local Connection Addresses | O | This information element indicates the IP address and port on the IM-MGW that the IMS user can send user plane data to. | +| | | Remote Connection Addresses | M | This information element indicates the IP address and port that the IM-MGW can send user plane data to. | +| | | IP Interface Type | O | This information element indicates the used interface type | +| | | Reserve Value | O | This information element indicates if multiple IMS resources are to be reserved. | +| | | Remote Connection Addresses Source Filter | O | This information element indicates an optional source filter restricting the IP addresses and ports that the IM-MGW shall accept as source for incoming user plane data. If this information element is set, the IM-MGW shall silently discard incoming user plane data from disallowed sources. | +| | | ECN Enable | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply ECN procedures. | +| | | ECN Initiation Method | C | This information element specifies the ECN Initiation method and requests the IM-MGW to perform IP header settings as an ECN endpoint. It may be included only if ECN is enabled. | +| | | Notify ECN Failure Event | C | This information element requests a notification if an ECN failure occurs. It may only be supplied if ECN is enabled. | +| | | ICE Connectivity Check | C | This information element requests the IM-MGW to perform ICE connectivity check as defined by IETF RFC 5245 [143]. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | Notify ICE Connectivity Check Result | C | This information element requests a notification of ICE connectivity check result. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | Notify New Peer Reflexive Candidate | C | This information element requests a notification of new peer reflexive candidate was discovered during a connectivity check. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | Additional ICE Connectivity Check | C | This information element requests the IM-MGW to perform additional ICE connectivity check as defined by IETF RFC 5245 [143]. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | ICE received candidate | O | This information element is present if MGCF indicates a received candidate for ICE. | +| | | ICE received password | O | This information element is present if MGCF indicates a received password for ICE. | + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | Allowed RTCP APP message types | O | This information element is present if the MGCF allows the IM-MGW to send RTCP APP packets of the indicated types. The IM-MGW shall not send other RTCP APP packets. If the parameter is not supplied, the IM-MGW shall not send any RTCP APP packets. | +| | | SDPCapNeg configuration | O | This information element provides SDPCapNeg configuration(s) using as "a=acap", "a=tcap", "a=pcfg" and "a=acfg" SDP attributes. | +| | | Additional Bandwidth Properties | O | This information element indicates additional bandwidth properties using "a=bw-info" SDP attribute(s) as defined by 3GPP TS 26.114 [104]. | +| Configure IMS Resources Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | IMS Termination | M | This information element indicates the IMS termination where the command was executed. | +| | | Local IMS Resource | O | This information element indicates the resources that the IM-MGW has reserved to receive the user plane data from the far end. | +| | | Remote IMS Resource | M | This information element indicates the resource (i.e. codec) that the IM-MGW shall use to send user data to. | +| | | Local Connection Address | O | This information element indicates the IP address and port on the IM-MGW that the remote end can send user plane data to. | +| | | Remote Connection Address | M | This information element indicates the IP address and port that the IM-MGW can send user plane data to. | + +#### 9.3.1.3 Reserve IMS Connection point and configure remote resources + +This procedure is used to reserve multimedia-processing resources for an Mb interface connection. + +**Table 27: Procedures toward the IM Subsystem: reserve local, reserve remote IMS connection point** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Reserve IMS Connection Point and Configure Remote Resources | MGCF | Context/Context Request | M | This information element indicates the existing context or requests a new context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Priority information | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply priority treatment for the terminations and bearer connections in the specified context. | +| | | IMS Termination/IMS Termination Request | M | This information element indicates the existing bearer termination or requests a new IMS termination for the bearer to be established. | +| | | Local IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resource(s) (i.e. codecs) for which the IM-MGW shall be prepared to receive user data. | +| | | Remote IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resources (i.e. codec) that the IM-MGW shall use to send user data in the IMS. | +| | | IP Interface Type | O | This information element indicates the used interface type | +| | | Reserve Value | O | This information element indicates if multiple IMS resources are to be reserved. | +| | | Local Connection Address request | M | This information element requests an IP address and a port number on the IM-MGW that the remote end can send user plane data to. | +| | | Remote Connection Addresses | M | This information element indicates the IP address and ports at an IMS user that the IM-MGW can send user plane data to. | +| | | Notify termination heartbeat | M | This information element requests termination heartbeat indications. | +| | | Notify Released Bearer | O | This information element requests a notification of a released bearer. | +| | | IP Realm Identifier | O | This information element indicates the IP realm of the IP termination. | +| | | ECN Enable | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply ECN procedures and IP header settings as an ECN endpoint. | +| | | ECN Initiation Method | C | This information element specifies the ECN Initiation method and requests the IM-MGW to perform IP header settings as an ECN endpoint. It may be included only if ECN is enabled. | +| | | Notify ECN Failure Event | C | This information element requests a notification if an ECN failure occurs. It may only be supplied if ECN is enabled. | +| | | Diffserv Code Point | O | This information element requests the IM-MGW to apply a specific Diffserv Code Point to the IP headers. | +| | | STUN server request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests the IM-MGW to answer STUN connectivity checks for ICE. | +| | | ICE Connectivity Check | C | This information element requests the IM-MGW to perform ICE connectivity check as defined by IETF RFC 5245 [143]. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | Notify ICE Connectivity Check Result | C | This information element requests a notification of ICE connectivity check result. It is only applicable for full ICE. | + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | Notify New Peer Reflexive Candidate | C | This information element requests a notification of new peer reflexive candidate was discovered during a connectivity check. It is only applicable for full ICE. | +| | | ICE password request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE password. | +| | | ICE Ufrag request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE ufrag. | +| | | ICE host candidate request | O | This information element is present if MGCF requests an ICE host candidate. | +| | | ICE received candidate | O | This information element is present if MGCF indicates a received candidate for ICE. | +| | | ICE received password | O | This information element is present if MGCF indicates a received password for ICE. | +| | | ICE received Ufrag | O | This information element is present if MGCF indicates a received Ufrag for ICE. | +| | | Allowed RTCP APP message types | O | This information element is present if the MGCF allows the IM-MGW to send RTCP APP packets of the indicated types. The IM-MGW shall not send other RTCP APP packets. If the parameter is not supplied, the IM-MGW shall not send any RTCP APP packets. | +| | | SDPCapNeg configuration | O | This information element provides SDPCapNeg configuration(s) using as "a=acap", "a=tcap", "a=pcfg" and "a=acfg" SDP attributes. | +| | | Additional Bandwidth Properties | O | This information element indicates additional bandwidth properties using "a=bw-info" SDP attribute(s) as defined by 3GPP TS 26.114 [104]. | +| Reserve IMS Connection Point and Configure Remote Resources Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | IMS Termination | M | This information element indicates the IMS termination where the command was executed. | +| | | Local IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resources that the IM-MGW has reserved to receive the user plane data from IMS. | +| | | Remote IMS Resources | M | This information element indicates the resource (i.e. codec) that the IM-MGW shall use to send user data. | +| | | Local Connection Addresses | M | This information element indicates the IP address on the IM-MGW that shall receive user plane data from the IMS. | +| | | ICE password | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE password assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE Ufrag | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE Ufrag assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE host candidate | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It indicates the ICE host candidate assigned by the IM-MGW. | +| | | ICE lite indication | C | This information element shall be present only if an ICE host candidate request was contained in the request, and the IM-MGW supports ICE lite, but not full ICE. It indicates that the IM-MGW only supports ICE lite. | + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | SDPCapNeg configuration | C | This information element shall be present only if it was contained in the request. It provides SDPCapNeg configuration(s) using as "a=acap", "a=tcap", "a=pcfg" and "a=acfg" SDP attributes. | + +#### 9.3.1.4 Release IMS termination + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to release a termination towards the IMS and free all related resources. + +**Table 28: Release IMS termination** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------------------------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Release IMS Termination | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination to be released. | +| Release IMS Termination Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.1.5 Detect IMS RTP Tel event + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to request from the MGW the detection of telephony events signalled within RTP according to RFC 4733 [105] and the notification of received telephony events. This procedure is the same as that is defined in the clause "Detect DTMF" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +**Table 29: VOID** + +#### 9.3.1.6 Notify IMS RTP Tel event + +This procedure is used by the MGW to notify the MGCF about the detection of telephony events signalled within RTP according to RFC 4733 [105]. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Report DTMF" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +**Table 30: VOID** + +#### 9.3.1.7 Void + +#### 9.3.1.8 Send IMS RTP Tel event + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to request from the MGW to signal a telephone event within RTP according to RFC 4733 [105]. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Send DTMF" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.9 Stop IMS RTP Tel event + +This procedure is used by the MGW to request from the MGW to stop signalling a telephone event within RTP according to RFC 4733 [105]. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Stop DTMF" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.10 Termination heartbeat indication + +This procedure is used to report indication of hanging termination. + +**Table 30a: Procedures between (G)MSC server and MGW: Hanging termination indication** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|--------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Termination heartbeat indication | MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination for which the termination heartbeat is reported. | +| | | Termination heartbeat | M | Hanging Termination event, as defined in TS 29.332 [15]. | +| Termination heartbeat indication Ack | (G)MSC-S | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.1.11 IMS Bearer Released + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to indicate towards the MGCF that an error occurred on an IMS termination which requires the release of the termination. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Bearer Released" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.12 End IMS RTP Tel event + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to indicate to the IM-MGW to stop detection of telephony events signalled within RTP according to IETF RFC 4733 [105]. This procedure is the same as that is defined in the clause "Stop Detect DTMF" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.13 IMS Send Tone + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to generate a tone at termination towards IMS. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Send Tone" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.14 IMS Stop Tone + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to stop generating a tone at a termination towards IMS. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Stop Tone" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.15 IMS Tone Completed + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to indicate to the MGCF that a tone has finished being generated at a termination. This procedure is the same as that defined in the clause "Tone Completed" in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.1.16 ECN Failure Indication + +This procedure is used to report ECN related errors (see clause 9.2.11.1c). + +**Table 9.3.1.16.1: Procedures toward the IM Subsystem: ECN Failure Indication** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|----------------------------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ECN Failure Indication | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination for which the ECN failure is reported. | +| | | ECN Failure Indication | M | This IE indicates an ECN failure event. | +| ECN Failure Indication Ack | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination where the command was executed | + +#### 9.3.1.17 ICE Connectivity Check Result Notification + +This procedure is used to report ICE connectivity check result for Full ICE. + +**Table 9.3.1.17.1: Procedures between MGCF and IM-MGW: ICE Connectivity Check Result Notification** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ICE Connectivity Check Result Notification | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination for which the ICE Connectivity Check Result is reported. | +| | | ICE Connectivity Check Result | M | This information element indicates an ICE Connectivity Check Result event. | +| ICE Connectivity Check Result Notification Ack | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.1.18 ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate Notification + +This procedure is used to report ICE new peer reflexive candidate for Full ICE. + +**Table 9.3.1.18.1: Procedures between MGCF and IM-MGW: ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate Notification** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|---------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate Notification | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination for which the ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate is reported. | +| | | ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate | M | This information element indicates an ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate event. | +| ICE New Peer Reflexive Candidate Notification Ack | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination where the command was executed. | + +### 9.3.2 Procedures related to a termination towards an ISUP network + +A mapping of the procedures defined here to H.248 procedures and parameters is provided in 3GPP TS 29.332 [15]. + +#### 9.3.2.1 Reserve TDM circuit + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to reserve a TDM circuit in the IM-MGW towards the preceding/succeeding CS network element. + +**Table 31: Reserve TDM circuit procedure** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|---------------------|-----------|--------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Reserve TDM Circuit | MGCF | Context/Context Request | M | This information element indicates the existing context or requests a new context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the physical bearer termination for the TDM circuit. | +| | | Bearer Service Characteristics | M | This information element indicates the bearer service requested by the user. | +| | | Notify termination heartbeat | O | This information element requests termination heartbeat indications. | +| | | Notify Released Bearer | O | This information element requests a notification of a released bearer | +| Reserve Circuit Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.2.2 Change TDM through-connection + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to modify the through-connection (forward, backward, both-way, inactive) of a TDM termination at the IM-MGW towards the PSTN. + +This procedure is the same as Change Through Connection in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.3 Activate TDM voice-processing function + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to activate or de-activate a voice processing function of a TDM termination at the IM-MGW towards the PSTN. This voice processing function may include a cancellation for electronic echoes. + +This procedure is the same as Activate Voice Processing Function in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.4 Send TDM tone + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to generate a tone at a TDM termination towards the PSTN. + +This procedure is the same as Send Tone in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.5 Stop TDM tone + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to stop generating a tone at a TDM termination towards the PSTN. + +This procedure is the same as Stop tone in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.6 Play TDM announcement + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to generate an announcement at a TDM termination towards the PSTN. The MGCF may request a notification that the announcement is completed. This procedure is the same as Play Announcement in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. This procedure is optional. + +#### 9.3.2.7 TDM announcement completed + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to notify the MGCF that an announcement at a TDM termination towards the PSTN is completed. This procedure is the same as Announcement Completed in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. This procedure is optional. + +#### 9.3.2.8 Stop TDM announcement + +This procedure is the same as Stop Announcement 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to stop generating an announcement at a TDM termination towards the PSTN. This procedure is optional. + +#### 9.3.2.9 Continuity check + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to generate a continuity check tone at a TDM termination towards the PSTN and to inform the MGCF about the result of the continuity check as soon as the continuity check tone is received or a time-out occurs. This procedure is optional. + +**Table 32: Continuity check procedure** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Continuity check | MGCF | Context/Context Request | M | This information element indicates the existing context or requests a new context for the bearer termination. | +| | | TDM Termination | M | This information element indicates the existing bearer termination | +| | | Request for continuity tone sending | M | This information request the IM-MGW to apply the continuity check procedure on the indicated TDM termination | +| | | Request for continuity check tone detection | M | This information request the IM-MGW to inform e continuity check procedure on the indicated TDM termination | + +#### 9.3.2.10 Continuity check verify + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to indicate towards the MGCF that the continuity check at a TDM termination towards the PSTN has been completed and to return the result of the check: success or failure. This procedure is optional. + +**Table 33: Continuity check verify procedure** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Continuity check Verify | IM-MGW | Context/t | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | TDM Termination | M | This information element indicates the TDM termination involved in the procedure | +| | | Outcome of the continuity check | M | This information element indicates the outcome of the continuity check (successful/unsuccessful) | + +#### 9.3.2.11 Continuity check response + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to order the IM-MGW to loop back an incoming continuity check tone at a TDM termination towards the PSTN. This procedure is optional. + +**Table 34: Continuity check response procedure** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|---------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Continuity check response | MGCF | Context/Context Request | M | This information element indicates the existing context or requests a new context for the bearer termination. | +| | | TDM Termination | M | This information element indicates the existing bearer termination | +| | | Request for loop back of the continuity tone | M | This information request the IM-MGW to loop back the continuity check tone on the indicated TDM termination | + +#### 9.3.2.12 Release TDM termination + +This procedure is used by the MGCF to release a TDM termination at the IM-MGW towards the PSTN and free all related resources. + +**Table 35: Release TDM termination procedure** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|-----------------------------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Release TDM Termination | MGCF | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination to be released. | +| Release TDM Termination Ack | IM-MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.2.13 Termination Out-of-Service + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to indicate towards the MGCF that one or several physical termination(s) will go out of service. This procedure is the same as Termination Out-of-Service in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.14 Termination heartbeat indication + +This procedure is used to report indication of hanging termination. + +**Table 35a: Procedures between (G)MSC server and MGW: Hanging termination indication** + +| Procedure | Initiated | Information element name | Information element required | Information element description | +|--------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Termination heartbeat indication | MGW | Context | M | This information element indicates the context for the bearer termination. | +| | | Bearer Termination | M | This information element indicates the bearer termination for which the termination heartbeat is reported. | +| | | Termination heartbeat | M | Hanging termination event, as defined in TS 29.332 [15]. | +| Termination heartbeat indication Ack | (G)MSC-S | Context | M | This information element indicates the context where the command was executed. | + +#### 9.3.2.15 Bearer Released + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to indicate towards the MGCF that an error occurred on a physical termination which requires the release of the termination. This procedure is the same as Bearer Released in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +#### 9.3.2.16 TDM tone completed + +This procedure is used by the IM-MGW to MGCF to indicate that a tone has finished being generated at a TDM termination. + +This procedure is the same as Tone Completed in 3GPP TS 23.205 [27]. + +### 9.3.3 Procedures related to a termination towards a BICC network + +The call related procedures detailed in table 36 shall be supported. Those procedures are defined in 3GPP TS 29.332 [15]. + +**Table 36: Required procedures defined in TS 29.332 [15]** + +| Procedure defined in TS 29.332 [15] | Remarks | +|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| Establish Bearer | | +| Prepare Bearer | | +| Change Through-Connection | | +| Release Bearer | | +| Release Termination | | +| Bearer Established | | +| Bearer Released | | +| Send Tone | | +| Stop Tone | | +| Tone completed | | +| Play Announcement | Optional | +| Stop Announcement | Optional | +| Announcement Completed | Optional | +| Confirm Char | Optional | +| Modify Bearer Characteristics | Optional | +| Reserve Char | Optional | +| Bearer Modified | Optional | +| Activate Voice Processing Function | Optional | +| Tunnel Information Down | Conditional: For IP Transport at BICC termination | +| Tunnel Information Up | Conditional: For IP Transport at BICC termination | +| Termination Out-of-Service | | +| Termination heartbeat indication | | + +### 9.3.4 Non-call related procedures + +The procedures from 3GPP TS 23.205 [27] detailed in table 37 shall be applied for the IM-MGW handling component of the Mn interface. + +**Table 37: Non-call related procedures** + +| Procedure defined in TS 29.332 [15] | Corresponding Procedure defined in TS 23.205 [27] | Remarks | +|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| IM-MGW Out of service | MGW Out of Service | | +| IM-MGW Communication Up | MGW Communication Up | | +| IM-MGW Restoration | MGW Restoration | | +| IM-MGW Register | MGW Register | | +| IM-MGW Re-register | MGW Re-register | | +| MGCF Ordered Re-register | (G)MSC Server Ordered Re-register | | +| MGCF Restoration | (G)MSC Server Restoration | | +| MGCF Out of Service | (G)MSC Server Out of Service | | +| Termination Out-of-Service | Termination Out-of-Service | The "Termination Out-of-Service procedure" is used as call-related H.248 command as well | +| Termination Restoration | Termination Restoration | | +| Audit Value | Audit Value | | +| Audit Capability | Audit Capability | | +| Command Rejected | Command Rejected | The "Command Rejected" procedure may be used in response both to call-related and non-call-related H.248 Commands. | +| IM-MGW Capability Change | Capability Update | | +| IM-MGW Resource Congestion Handling - Activate | MGW Resource Congestion Handling - Activate | | +| IM-MGW Resource Congestion Handling - Indication | MGW Resource Congestion Handling - Indication | | +| Control association monitoring | Control association monitoring | | +| Inactivity timeout activation | Inactivity timeout activation | | +| Inactivity timeout indication | Inactivity timeout indication | | +| Hanging termination detection | Hanging termination detection | | +| Hanging termination detection | Hanging termination detection | | + +### 9.3.5 Multiple IP Realms + +The procedures to support multiple IP realms in the present clause are optional. + +Figure 9.3.5.1 shows a scenario where multiple IP realms are applied. + + + +The diagram illustrates a central box labeled "IM-MGW". Inside this box, there are two sub-boxes labeled "Termination 1" and "Termination 2". To the left of the "IM-MGW" box is a cloud-shaped icon labeled "IM CN1", connected to the "Termination 1" box by a line with a small circle at the connection point. To the right of the "IM-MGW" box is another cloud-shaped icon labeled "CS CN1", connected to the "Termination 2" box by a line with a small circle at the connection point. + +Diagram of Multiple IP realms scenario showing IM CN1 connected to Termination 1 and CS CN1 connected to Termination 2 of an IM-MGW. + +**Figure 9.3.5.1 Multiple IP realms scenario** + +Shown in figure 9.3.5, the IM CN1 and CS CN1 represent separate IP realms. The definition of IP realm is specified in IETF RFC 2663[90]. + +The termination1 and termination2 are connected with different IP realms in the IM-MGW separately. + +For establishing session when multiple IP realms are used in the IM-MGW, the MGCF may indicate the IP realm identifier to the IM-MGW. The IM-MGW shall assign the IP termination with the indicated IP realm. + +A default IP realm may be configured in IM-MGW such that if the IM-MGW has not received the IP realm identifier and the IM-MGW supports multiple IP realms then the default IP realm shall be used. + +If the IM-MGW does not support the option to indicate an IP realm then it is free to select any IP port. + +## 9.4 Multimedia Priority Service (MPS) Support + +### 9.4.1 General + +The Multimedia Priority Service (MPS) is specified in 3GPP TS 22.153 [136]. The MGCF/IM-MGW may support the priority treatment of a call/session identified as an MPS call/session. If MPS is supported then upon receipt of the MPS priority information in the call control signalling: + +- The MGCF shall recognise the call/session as having priority. +- The MGCF shall send the Priority information for a context to the IM-MGW to enable the priority treatment described below related to the IM-MGW. +- The MGCF shall apply priority handling to H.248 transactions related to priority calls/sessions when network resources are congested, e.g., preferential treatment in any queues or buffers. +- If the H.248 control association utilises a transport with the possibility for prioritisation, the MGCF may apply priority using the appropriate prioritisation procedures. +- If the MPS Priority service requires a specific MPS DSCP setting, the MGCF shall configure the IM-MGW to apply a specific MPS DSCP marking to the user data transport packets to indicate that the packets are of a higher priority than those for normal calls. +- If the IM-MGW receives an indication to apply a specific MPS DSCP marking to the user data transport packets, it shall apply this DSCP marking to the IP headers. + +NOTE 1: Support of Diffserv procedures by the IMS-MGW assumes an operator uses Diffserv for prioritising user plane traffic related to an MPS call/session. + +- When the MGCF marks a Context with Priority information, the IM-MGW may use the Priority information for selecting resources for the media and 294isalignme transport with priority. The following actions may be taken by the IM-MGW if it has reached a congested state: + - i) seize priority reserved resources; or + - ii) if resources are completely congested, indicate that in a Command Response error code. + +NOTE 2: The Priority information can be used to derive Layer 2 QoS marking and trigger priority identification and priority treatment for other QoS technologies than Diffserv. + +This clause describes the Mn signalling procedures and their interactions with SIP signalling in the control plane and with user plane procedures to support the requirements for MPS. These Mn signalling procedures may or may not apply depending on the network configuration (e.g. whether the IM-MGW is shared by multiple MGCFs or whether the MGCF controls multiple IM-MGWs for a given route - Media Gateway Group). + +The MGCF can receive a SIP INVITE with MPS priority information (see 3GPP TS 23.228 [12], clause 5.21). + +### 9.4.2 IM-MGW Resource Congestion in ADD response, request is queued + +If the MGCF requests a resource via the Reserve IMS Connection Point and configure remote resources procedure or Reserve IMS Connection Point procedure and receives an error indicating that the requested resource could not be seized (e.g. H.248 error code #510 "insufficient resources") and the MGCF does not have an alternative IM-MGW through which it can route the call/session, the MGCF queues the priority call/session and gives it priority over any further Reserve IMS Connection Point and configure remote resources or Reserve IMS Connection Point procedures for + +lower priority calls/sessions towards this IM-MGW until the requested resource for this queued call/session is successfully seized. The example sequence is shown in Figure 9.4.2.1. + + + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant External + participant MGCF + participant IM-MGW + Note right of IM-MGW: IM-MGW is Congested + External->>MGCF: 1. INVITE [MPS priority indication] + Note left of MGCF: Reserve IMS Connection Point + MGCF->>IM-MGW: 2. H.248 ADD Req [C=?, T=?, Laddr=?, Lport=?, Local Resources, Priority] + IM-MGW-->>MGCF: 3. H.248 ADD Reject [Error = #510] + Note left of MGCF: 4. MGCF queues MPS request + Note left of MGCF: Reserve IMS Connection Point + MGCF->>IM-MGW: 5. H.248 ADD Req [C=?, T=?, Laddr=?, Lport=?, Local Resources, Priority] + Note right of IM-MGW: IM-MGW successfully seizes required resources + IM-MGW-->>MGCF: 6. H.248 ADD Resp [C=C1, T=T2, Laddr=IP2o, LPort=P2o] + +``` + +Sequence diagram for Figure 9.4.2.1: Request to Reserve MPS priority call resources when IM-MGW is congested. The diagram shows the interaction between an MGCF and an IM-MGW. The MGCF sends an INVITE with MPS priority indication. It then attempts to reserve an IMS Connection Point, which triggers an H.248 ADD Req to the IM-MGW. The IM-MGW responds with an H.248 ADD Reject (Error #510) because it is congested. The MGCF then queues the MPS request. After queuing, it attempts to reserve the IMS Connection Point again, which triggers another H.248 ADD Req to the IM-MGW. The IM-MGW then successfully seizes the required resources and responds with an H.248 ADD Resp. + +Figure 9.4.2.1: Request to Reserve MPS priority call resources when IM-MGW is congested + +### 9.4.3 IM-MGW Resource Congestion in ADD response, MGCF seizes new IM-MGW + +If the MGCF requests a resource via the Reserve IMS Connection Point and configure remote resources procedure or Reserve IMS Connection Point procedure and receives an error indicating that the requested resources could not be seized due to congestion (e.g. H.248 error code #510 "insufficient resources") and Media Gateway Groups are implemented the MGCF seizes a new IM-MGW from the same Media Gateway Group before resorting to any queuing of the priority call/session (as described in clause 9.4.2) to enable the MPS call/session to proceed as early as possible. + +### 9.4.4 IM-MGW Priority Resource Allocation + +If the IM-MGW supports the Priority information (e.g. determined through provisioning or package profile), the MGCF requests a resource via the Reserve IMS Connection Point and configure remote resources procedure or Reserve IMS Connection Point procedure and includes the Priority information. The IM-MGW may then provide priority allocation of resources once a congestion threshold is reached. The example sequence is shown in Figure 9.4.4.1. If the IM-MGW is completely congested it shall indicate this to the MGCF as described in clause 9.4.2. + + + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant External + participant MGCF + participant IM-MGW + Note right of IM-MGW: IM-MGW is in a congested state but allocates priority resources to this call. + External->>MGCF: 1. INVITE [MPS priority indication] + Note left of MGCF: Reserve IMS Connection Point + MGCF->>IM-MGW: 2. H.248 ADD Req [C=?, T=?, Laddr=?, Lport=?, Local Resources, Priority] + IM-MGW-->>MGCF: 3. H.248 ADD Resp [C=C1, T=T2, Laddr=IP2o, LPort=P2o] + +``` + +Sequence diagram for Figure 9.4.4.1: Request to reserve MPS priority call resources when IM-MGW is congested, priority resources are allocated. The diagram shows the interaction between an MGCF and an IM-MGW. The MGCF sends an INVITE with MPS priority indication. It then attempts to reserve an IMS Connection Point, which triggers an H.248 ADD Req to the IM-MGW. The IM-MGW responds with an H.248 ADD Resp, indicating that it is in a congested state but has allocated priority resources to this call. + +Figure 9.4.4.1: Request to reserve MPS priority call resources when IM-MGW is congested, priority resources are allocated + +The IM-MGW may also provide priority allocation for resources requested via a subsequent Configure IMS resources procedure not including Priority information if the related context has been marked with priority information during the Reserve IMS Connection Point procedure or Reserve IMS Connection point and configure remote resources procedure. + +### 9.4.5 IM-MGW Priority User Data marking + +The MGCF may request the streams associated to an MPS call/session to be marked with a certain priority code point as described in clause 8.4. The IM-MGW shall then mark each IP packet header accordingly. The example sequence is shown in Figure 9.4.5.1. + + + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant External + participant MGCF + participant IM-MGW + Note left of MGCF: Reserve IMS Connection Point + External->>MGCF: 1. INVITE [MPS priority indication] + MGCF->>IM-MGW: 2. H.248 ADD Req [C=?, T= ?, Laddr = ?, Lport = ?, Local Resources, Diffserv Mark = DSCP1, Priority] + IM-MGW-->>MGCF: 3. H.248 ADD Resp [C=C1, T=T2, Laddr=IP2o, LPort=P2o] + Note right of IM-MGW: IM-MGW is requested to apply DSCP value in IP header of user data packets. +``` + +The diagram illustrates a sequence of interactions between an MGCF and an IM-MGW. It begins with an external INVITE message containing an MPS priority indication. The MGCF then sends an H.248 ADD Request to the IM-MGW, specifying parameters like C, T, Laddr, Lport, Local Resources, Diffserv Mark (DSCP1), and Priority. The IM-MGW responds with an H.248 ADD Response containing updated parameters like C=C1, T=T2, Laddr=IP2o, and LPort=P2o. A note on the right indicates that the IM-MGW is requested to apply the DSCP value in the IP header of user data packets. A bracket on the left side of the MGCF lifeline groups the INVITE and the subsequent H.248 messages under the label 'Reserve IMS Connection Point'. + +Sequence diagram showing the request to reserve IMS resources and apply DSCP marking for MPS between MGCF and IM-MGW. + +**Figure 9.4.5.1: Request to reserve IMS resources and apply DSCP marking for MPS** + +# --- Annex A (informative): Void + +# --- Annex B (normative): Codec Negotiation between a BICC CS network and the IM CN subsystem + +## B.1 Introduction + +This annex describes optional procedures for interworking of codec negotiation between a BICC CS network and the IM CN subsystem. + +## --- B.2 Control plane interworking + +The following optional procedures apply in addition to the procedures of clause 7.3 when both the BICC CS network and the IM CN subsystem support codec negotiation. All five variations of the bearer set-up procedures defined in clauses 7.4 and 7.5 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30] are supported. The codec negotiation procedures are also independent of the procedures for interworking between continuity procedures and SDP preconditions. + +### B.2.1 Incoming call interworking from SIP to BICC at I-MGCF + +#### B.2.1.1 Sending of IAM + +When the I-MGCF receives an INVITE with SDP offer, the I-MGCF shall follow the procedures of clause B.2.5 to convert the list of codecs in the SDP offer into a Supported Codec List for transmission in the outgoing IAM, according to clause 8.3.1 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30], and deleting those codecs not supported at the IM-MGW. When generating the Supported Codec List, the I-MGCF should add to the SDP offer all codec configurations for which it can provide transcoding. The I-MGCF shall allocate any IM-MGW resources as necessary to support the chosen bearer set-up procedures towards the BICC CS network. + +When the I-MGCF receives an INVITE without SDP offer, the I-MGCF shall continue call establishment without interworking of codec negotiation procedures. The mid-call interworking procedures of clause B.2.3 and clause B.2.4 may still apply. + +#### B.2.1.2 Sending of SDP answer + +The I-MGCF shall suspend the SDP answer procedure until it receives backward codec information from the BICC serving node terminating codec negotiation. When the I-MGCF receives the backward codec information, it shall select a codec configuration for use on the bearer interface to the IM CN subsystem from the codecs in the SDP offer, format an SDP answer based on this selected codec, send the SDP answer to the offerer in the appropriate SIP message (e.g., a reliable 18x response), and complete bearer establishment procedures. To avoid allocating a transcoder at the IM-MGW, the I-MGCF should preferably select a codec for the IM CN subsystem by converting the Selected Codec from the BICC CS network into an SDP answer according to the procedures of clause B.2.5, if allowed by the SDP offer/answer rules. Otherwise the I-MGCF should select the highest priority codec from the codecs in the received SDP offer supported by the IM-MGW for insertion in the SDP answer. Note that the I-MGCF stores the Available Codec List and does not send it to the offerer in the SDP answer. Codec negotiation is complete so it is not necessary for the offerer to begin a second phase offer/answer exchange using the PRACK request. + +### B.2.2 Outgoing call interworking from BICC to SIP at O-MGCF + +#### B.2.2.1 Sending of INVITE + +When the O-MGCF receives an IAM, the O-MGCF shall follow the procedures of clause B.2.5 to convert the Supported Codec List from the IAM into an SDP offer for transmission in the outgoing INVITE request, according to RFC 3264, deleting those codecs not supported at the IM-MGW. When generating the SDP offer, the O-MGCF should include all codec configurations for which it can provide transcoding in addition to those converted from the Supported Codec List. The O-MGCF shall include at least one AMR codec configuration in the SDP offer. The O-MGCF shall allocate any IM-MGW resources as necessary to support the inclusion of session address information in the SDP offer towards the IM CN subsystem. + +#### B.2.2.2 Responding to serving node initiating codec negotiation + +The O-MGCF shall suspend the incoming bearer set-up procedure while waiting for receipt of the SDP answer from the IM CN subsystem. When the O-MGCF receives the SDP answer while suspending the incoming bearer set-up procedure, it shall select a codec configuration for use on the bearer interface to the IM CN subsystem from the codecs in the SDP answer, construct the Available Codec List for the BICC CS network from the list of codecs received in the Supported Codec List by removing codecs not supported at the IM-MGW, choose the Selected Codec for the BICC CS network from the codecs in the Available Codec List, initiate the second SDP offer/answer exchange with the IM CN subsystem using the codec selected for the IM CN subsystem, if necessary, and resume the incoming bearer set-up procedure in the BICC CS network. The O-MGCF should select codecs for the bearer interfaces to the BICC CS network and IM CN subsystem in such a way as to avoid transcoding at the IM-MGW and minimize speech degradation, if possible, according to clause B.2.5. Otherwise the O-MGCF should choose the highest priority codec from the Available Codec List as the Selected Codec for the BICC CS network, and the highest priority codec from the codecs in the SDP answer as the codec for the IM CN subsystem. If the SDP answer only included a single voice codec, then there is no need for a second SDP offer/answer exchange, and the codec selected for the IM CN subsystem is the codec in the SDP answer. + +Certain BICC timers or events can force completion of the incoming bearer set-up procedure before the O-MGCF receives the SDP answer from the IM CN subsystem. In this case, the O-MGCF shall perform the terminating codec negotiation procedure according to clause 8.3.3 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30], including all supported codecs in the Available Codec List, and shall resume the incoming bearer set-up procedure without waiting any longer for the SDP answer. + +When an SDP answer arrives from the IM CN subsystem in response to the SDP offer in an INVITE request after the BICC incoming bearer set-up procedure has started, the O-MGCF shall select a codec configuration for use on the bearer interface to the IM CN subsystem from the codecs in the SDP answer, choose a new Selected Codec for the BICC CS network from the codecs in the Available Codec List constructed during incoming bearer set-up, and initiate the second SDP offer/answer exchange with the IM CN subsystem using the codec selected for the IM CN subsystem, if necessary. The O-MGCF should select codecs for the bearer interfaces to the BICC CS network and IM CN subsystem in such a way as to avoid transcoding at the IM-MGW and minimize speech degradation, if possible, according to clause B.2.5. Otherwise the O-MGCF should select the highest priority codecs from the available options for the two bearer interfaces. If the SDP answer only included a single voice codec, then there is no need for a second SDP offer/answer exchange, and the codec selected for the IM CN subsystem is the codec in the SDP answer. When the call in the BICC CS network enters a state capable of supporting codec modification, if the new Selected Codec is different from the Selected Codec chosen during the incoming bearer set-up procedure for the BICC CS network, the O-MGCF should initiate the codec modification procedure towards the BICC CS network using the new Selected Codec, according to clause 10.4.1 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30]. + +### B.2.3 Mid-call interworking from SIP to BICC at I-MGCF or O-MGCF + +#### B.2.3.1 Receipt of SDP offer + +When the MGCF receives a SIP message (e.g. UPDATE request or re-INVITE request) with an SDP offer that is not associated with incoming call bearer establishment or preconditions, if the call is in a state capable of supporting BICC codec negotiation, the MGCF shall follow the procedures of clause B.2.5 to convert the list of codecs in the SDP offer into a Supported Codec List, delete those codecs in the Supported Codec List not supported at the IM-MGW, and initiate the mid-call codec negotiation procedure according to clause 10.4.4 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30], by sending an APM with the Supported Codec List and an Action indicator set to "mid-call codec negotiation". When generating the Supported Codec List, the MGCF should add to the SDP offer all codec configurations for which it can provide transcoding. + +When the MGCF receives a SIP message with an SDP offer that is not associated with incoming call bearer establishment or preconditions, if the call is not in a state capable of supporting BICC codec negotiation, the MGCF shall respond to the SDP offer with existing procedures for the IM CN subsystem. When the call is in a state capable of supporting BICC codec negotiation, the MGCF may send a re-INVITE request without SDP towards the IM CN subsystem, soliciting a response with an SDP offer, thereby restarting the codec negotiation interworking procedure. + +#### B.2.3.2 Generating SDP answer + +After initiating a BICC codec negotiation procedure towards the BICC CS network in response to receipt of a SIP message with an SDP offer from the IM CN subsystem, the MGCF shall suspend the SDP answer procedure until it receives codec information from the succeeding BICC serving node. If the succeeding serving node returns a successful response, the MGCF shall select a codec configuration for use on the bearer interface to the IM CN subsystem from the codecs in the SDP offer, format an SDP answer based on this selected codec, send the SDP answer to the offerer in the appropriate SIP message (e.g. 200 OK (UPDATE) or 200 OK (INVITE)), send an APM to the succeeding serving node with an Action indicator set to "successful codec modification", and complete bearer establishment procedures. To avoid allocating a transcoder at the IM-MGW, the MGCF should preferably select a codec for the IM CN subsystem by converting the Selected Codec from the BICC CS network into an SDP answer according to the procedures of clause B.2.5, if allowed by the SDP offer/answer rules. Otherwise the MGCF should select the highest priority codec from the codecs in the received SDP offer supported by the IM-MGW for insertion in the SDP answer. Note that the MGCF stores the Available Codec List and does not send it to the offerer in the SDP answer. + +If the succeeding serving node returns an Action indicator set to "mid-call codec negotiation failure", the MGCF either should send a 488 response to the SDP offerer indicating rejection of the initial SDP offer, or should select the highest priority codec from the codecs in the received SDP offer supported by the IM-MGW, format an SDP answer based on this selected codec, and send the SDP answer to the offerer in the appropriate SIP message. If the MGCF sends a 488 response to the SDP offerer, it should continue the call with the bearer configuration in place before initiating this codec negotiation procedure. + +### B.2.4 Mid-call interworking from BICC to SIP at I-MGCF or O-MGCF + +#### B.2.4.1 Receipt of mid-call codec negotiation request + +When the MGCF receives an APM with an Action indicator set to "mid-call codec negotiation", the MGCF shall follow the procedures of clause B.2.5 to convert the Supported Codec List from the APM into an SDP offer for transmission in an appropriate SIP message (e.g. re-INVITE request) towards the IM CN subsystem, according to RFC 3264 [36], deleting those codecs not supported at the IM-MGW. When generating the SDP offer, the MGCF should include all codec configurations for which it can provide transcoding in addition to those converted from the Supported Codec List. The MGCF shall include at least one AMR codec configuration in the SDP offer. + +#### B.2.4.2 Responding to serving node initiating mid-call codec negotiation + +The MGCF shall delay responding to the mid-call codec negotiation from the BICC CS network until it receives a response to the SDP offer from the IM CN subsystem. If the MGCF receives an SDP answer, it shall construct the Available Codec List for the BICC CS network from the list of codecs received in the Supported Codec List by removing codecs not supported at the IM-MGW, choose the Selected Codec for the BICC CS network from the codecs in the Available Codec List, and complete the mid-call codec negotiation procedure towards the preceding serving node according to clause 10.4.5 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30]. The MGCF should choose the Selected Codec for the BICC CS network in such a way as to avoid transcoding at the IM-MGW and minimize speech degradation, if possible, according to clause B.2.5. Otherwise the MGCF should choose the highest priority codec from the Available Codec List for the Selected Codec for the BICC CS network. If the MGCF receives an APM from the preceding serving node with an Action indicator set to "codec modification failure", then the MGCF may initiate a new SDP offer/answer exchange towards the IM CN subsystem in an attempt to recreate the bearer configuration in place before this codec negotiation procedure began. + +If the MGCF receives a 488 response or other failure response (e.g. 3xx-6xx) to the SDP offer, either it should reject the mid-call codec negotiation from the BICC CS network by sending an APM with an Action indicator set to "mid-call codec negotiation failure" towards the preceding serving node, or it should continue as if it received an SDP answer with no change in codec selected for the IM CN subsystem. If the MGCF sends an APM with an Action indicator set to "mid-call codec negotiation failure", it should continue the call with the bearer configuration in place before initiating this codec negotiation procedure. + +#### B.2.4.3 Receipt of codec modification request + +If the MGCF receives an APM from a BICC CS network that includes an Action indicator set to "modify codec" with no change in the selected codec, it shall act as a serving node terminating codec modification, according to clause 10.4.2 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30], without interworking the procedure with the IM CN subsystem. + +If the MGCF receives an APM from a BICC CS network that includes an Action indicator set to "modify codec" and the new selected codec in the message is different from the Selected Codec at the IM-MGW bearer interface to the BICC CS network, the MGCF either may act as a serving node terminating codec modification, according to clause 10.4.2 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30], without interworking the procedure with the IM CN subsystem, or may follow the procedures of clause B.2.5 to convert the new Available Codec List (with new priority order) from the APM into an SDP offer for transmission in an appropriate SIP message (e.g. re-INVITE request) towards the IM CN subsystem, according to RFC 3264 [36], deleting those codecs not supported at the IM-MGW. When generating the SDP offer, the MGCF should include all codec configurations for which it can provide transcoding in addition to those converted from the new Available Codec List. The MGCF shall include at least one AMR codec configuration in the SDP offer. + +If the MGCF sends a SIP message with an SDP offer towards the IM CN subsystem in response to receipt of a BICC codec modification request, then it shall delay responding to the BICC codec modification request until it receives a response to the SDP offer from the IM CN subsystem. When the MGCF receives either an SDP answer or a rejection of the SDP offer within the appropriate SIP message (e.g. 200 OK (INVITE)) from the IM CN subsystem, it shall decide whether to accept or reject the BICC codec modification procedure and complete the procedure for a BICC serving node terminating codec modification, according to clause 10.4.2 of ITU-T Q.1902.4 [30]. + +If the MGCF sends an APM with an Action indicator set to "codec modification failure" in response to receipt of a codec modification request, the preceding BICC serving node may retry the request with a mid-call codec negotiation using an APM including an Action indicator set to "mid-call negotiation" and a Supported Codec List with a new priority order encouraging selection of a new codec. + +### B.2.5 Codec parameter translation between BICC CS network and the IM CN subsystem + +The IM CN subsystem uses the Session Description Protocol (SDP, defined in IETF RFC 4566 [56]) to select and potentially re-negotiate the codec type and configuration and associated bearer format attributes to be used in the user plane. IETF RFC 3550 [51] defines the Real Time Protocol (RTP) for framing of all codecs in the user plane, IETF RFC 3551 [52] and IETF RFC 3555 [53] define the framing details for many of the ITU-T codecs, and IETF RFC 4867 [23] defines framing details for the AMR family of codecs. This clause will focus only on codec-specific SDP parameters]. The signalling plane of the IM CN subsystem uses SDP offer/answer procedures defined in IETF RFC 3264 [36] to select the desired codec type and configuration for the user plane from a prioritized list of codec types and configurations and to re-negotiate the user plane attributes as necessary. + +The bearer independent CS network uses the Single Codec and Codec List information elements of the Application Transport Mechanism (APM) defined in ITU-T Recommendation Q.765.5 [35] to negotiate (offer and select) and potentially re-negotiate the codec type and configuration and associated bearer format attributes to be used in the user plane. 3GPP TS 29.414 [25] and 3GPP TS 29.415 [26] define the IuFP framing protocol for all codecs in the user plane for both ATM and IP transport, and 3GPP TS 26.102 [50] provides the framing details for AMR and PCM family codecs. The Codec List information element of the APM comprises multiple instances of the Single Codec information element in priority order, as shown in figure 13 of ITU-T Recommendation Q.765.5 [35]. Figure 14 of ITU-T Recommendation Q.765.5 [35] defines the Single Codec information element. Clause 11.1.7.2 of ITU-T Recommendation Q.765.5 [35] defines the encoding of the Single Codec information element for the ITU-T codecs. 3GPP TS 26.103 [57] defines the encoding of the Single Codec information element for the 3GPP codecs, and table 7.11.3.1.3-2 of 3GPP TS 28.062 [58] defines the preferred configurations of the narrowband AMR codecs (Config-NB-Code) for interoperation with TFO. The signalling plane of the bearer independent CS network uses the APM to negotiate the desired codec type and configuration for the user plane from the prioritized list of codec types and to re-negotiate the user plane attributes as necessary. + +The following clauses define the translations between the SDP payload format parameters of the IM CN subsystem and the corresponding subfields of the Single Codec information element of the bearer independent CS network for certain 3GPP and ITU-T codecs. Following these translation rules will in many cases allow the IM-MGW to perform interworking between the framing protocols on the bearer interfaces to the BICC CS network and the IM CN subsystem without transcoding. Implementations may signal other codec types not listed herein or other codec configurations of + +codec types listed herein. Implementations may also choose to perform transcoding between codec configurations signalled separately for the bearer interfaces to the networks, if necessary, but voice quality may suffer. + +#### B.2.5.1 Codec parameters for 3GPP AMR-NB codecs + +Table B.1 shows the correspondence between the codec format parameters in the Single Codec information element (3GPP TS 26.103 [57]) and the SDP for the 3GPP narrowband AMR codecs (IETF RFC 4867 [23]). + +**Table B.1: Mapping between Single Codec subfields and SDP parameters for 3GPP AMR-NB codecs** + +| Single Codec information element | | SDP payload format parameters | | | +|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Codec Identification | ACS, SCS, OM, MACS | Payload Type number | Encoding name | Other Parameters (NOTE 1) (NOTE 2) | +| FR_AMR or OHR_AMR or HR_AMR | OM=0 or Selected Codec Type | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=values corresponding to ACS (NOTE 3) | +| FR_AMR or OHR_AMR or HR_AMR | (OM=1 or OM not present) and (Supported Codec List or Available Codec List) | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=select from values corresponding to ACS, SCS and MACS (NOTE 3) | +| UMTS_AMR | OM=0 or Selected Codec Type | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=values corresponding to ACS | +| UMTS_AMR | (OM=1 or OM not present) and (Supported Codec List or Available Codec List) | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=select from values corresponding to ACS, SCS and MACS (NOTE 4) | +| UMTS_AMR_2 | OM=0 or Selected Codec Type | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=values corresponding to ACS (NOTE 5) | +| UMTS_AMR_2 | (OM=1 or OM not present) and (Supported Codec List or Available Codec List) | dynamic | AMR | mode-set=select from values corresponding to ACS, SCS and MACS (NOTE 3) (NOTE 5) | + +NOTE 1: Table 1 of IETF RFC 4867 [23] provides the correspondence between codec rates and AMR modes for use when generating the "mode-set" parameter. When all modes are selected for use, the "mode-set" parameter shall not be included in SDP. + +NOTE 2: SDP payload format configurations in this table with only one value in the "mode-set" parameter shall not include the "mode-change-period" and "mode-change-neighbor" parameters. + +NOTE 3: Payload types for FR\_AMR, OHR\_AMR and HR\_AMR with more than one value in the "mode-set" parameter shall include the "mode-change-period=2", "mode-change-capability=2" parameters and should include the "mode-change-neighbor=1" parameter. + +NOTE 4: IETF RFC 4867 [23] does not currently provide a mechanism to signal the SCS, MACS or OM parameters in SDP, nor does it distinguish between the different AMR-NB codec types. Each AMR-NB codec type in the Supported Codec List or the Available Codec List with OM=1 should be translated into a list of SDP payload formats in priority order, where each includes a "mode-set" parameter with a unique value derived from the ACS, SCS and MACS. Each "mode-set" should correspond to a codec configuration that is compatible with the given codec type according to the compatibility rules defined in clauses 11 and 12 of TS 28.062 [58]. + +NOTE 5: Payload types for UMTS\_AMR\_2 should include the "mode-change-period=2", "mode-change-capability=2" and "mode-change-neighbor=1" parameters, normally used for signalling GSM AMR codecs, to assure end-to-end interoperability with OoBTC and TFO. Its actual capabilities would otherwise be signalled without these parameters. + +##### Definitions: + +**Supported Codec List:** contains the offered Codec Types and Configuration-possibilities of the node initiating codec negotiation in BICC (see also 3GPP TS 23.153). The Supported Codec List is sent from the initiating node forward to the terminating node. The Supported Codec List corresponds to an SDP offer during codec negotiation. + +**Available Codec List:** contains the offered Codec Types and Configuration-possibilities of the contiguous portion of the connection between initiating and terminating BICC nodes, including all intermediate nodes through the BICC network(s). The Available Codec List is sent from the BICC node terminating codec negotiation backward to the initiating node. The Available Codec List corresponds to information sometimes available in a first-round SDP answer. The Available Codec List might not represent an end-to-end view of the available Codec Types and Configuration-possibilities when traversing both BICC and SIP networks. + +**Selected Codec Type:** is determined by the node terminating codec negotiation. It specifies exactly the Codec Type and one unique Codec Configuration for the call. The Selected Codec Type corresponds to the final SDP answer. + +When translating from a Single Codec information element to the equivalent SDP payload format parameters, where either OM=0 (in the Supported or Available Codec List) or the information element is the Selected Codec Type, the SDP shall include a single payload type and any associated parameters from the corresponding row in table B.1. When translating from a Single Codec information element to the equivalent SDP payload format parameters, where OM=1 in the Supported or Available Codec List, the SDP shall only include payload formats corresponding to Codec Configurations compatible with the offered ACS, SCS and MACS, according to table B.1. Since the number of compatible payload formats can be large, implementations should select a reasonable subset of the higher-priority payload formats for inclusion in the SDP. When translating a list of Single Codec information elements into SDP, duplicate payload types (matching on all parameters) shall be removed. + +The following guidelines shall apply when translating from an SDP payload format specification to a Single Codec information element: + +- If there is no "mode-set" parameter for a payload format in the SDP and the SDP is to be translated into a Supported or Available Codec List, then the corresponding Single Codec subfields shall be OM=1, MACS=8, all SCS modes offered, and ACS modes offered. Alternatively it is sufficient to specify only the Codec Type (see below) and omit the other parameters. +- If there is no "mode-set" parameter for a payload format in an SDP answer that is to be translated into a Selected Codec Type, then the corresponding Single Codec subfields shall be derived from the payload type in the SDP offer (to which the SDP answer was sent in response). +- If there is a "mode-set" parameter for a payload format in the SDP, then the corresponding Single Codec subfields shall be OM=0 and ACS modes selected according to the value of "mode-set". The SCS shall be set identical to the ACS and MACS shall be set to the number of modes in the ACS. If this "mode-set" does not represent a valid configuration for the Codec Type (determined by OoBTC procedures), then the payload format shall not be translated. +- If a payload format in an SDP offer that is to be translated into a Supported Codec List includes "mode-change-period=2" parameter or includes "mode-change-capability=2" parameter, then the Codec Identification value for the corresponding Single Codec shall be FR\_AMR. +- If a payload format in an SDP answer that is to be translated into a Selected Codec Type or Available Codec List includes "mode-change-period=2", then the Codec Identification value for the corresponding Single Codec shall be one of FR\_AMR, HR\_AMR, OHR\_AMR or UMTS\_AMR\_2, if offered in the Supported Codec List. +- If a payload format in an SDP offer that is to be translated into a Supported Codec List does not include "mode-change-period=2" parameter and does not include "mode-change-capability=2" parameter, then the Codec Identification value for the corresponding Single Codec shall be UMTS\_AMR. +- If a payload format in an SDP answer that is to be translated into a Selected Codec Type or Available Codec List does not include "mode-change-period=2" parameter and does not include "mode-change-capability=2" parameter, then the Codec Identification value for the corresponding Single Codec shall be one of UMTS\_AMR\_2, FR\_AMR, HR\_AMR, OHR\_AMR or UMTS\_AMR, if offered in the Supported Codec List. + +#### B.2.5.2 Codec parameters for 3GPP AMR-WB codecs + +Table B.2 shows the correspondence between the codec format parameters in the Single Codec information element (3GPP TS 26.103 [57]) and the SDP for the 3GPP wideband AMR codecs (IETF RFC 4867 [23]). + +**Table B.2: Mapping between Single Codec subfields and SDP parameters for 3GPP AMR-WB codecs** + +| Single Codec information element | | SDP payload format parameters | | | +|----------------------------------|----------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Codec Identification | Config-WB-Code | Payload Type number | Encoding name | Other ParametersThe values are classified as follows
0x0000-- 0x0003, 0x0005, 0x0008, 0x000a, 0x000e, 0x000f, 0x0010 0x0014—0x01ff Excluded
0x0007, 0x0009, 0x000c and 0x0012 Mandatory
0x0004 optional (INFO String) if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
0x0006 optional (Routing Context if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
0x000b optional (Traffic Mode Type) if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
0x0011 (ASP Identifier) if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
0x0012 Affected point code is mandatory. The support of value 0 in the mask field is mandatory. All other values is outside the scope of this annex.
0x0013 (Correlation ID) if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
| +| 3.2 Variable Length Parameter Format M3UA Specific Parameters |The values are classified as follows
0x0201, 0x0202, 0x0203, 0x0211, 0x020d and 0x0214 to 0xffff Excluded
0x0204--0x0205, 0x0210 Mandatory
0x0200 optional (Network Appearance) if received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded,
0x0206 Optinal (Concerned Destination). If received and not supported the message is processed but the optional information element is silently discarded.
0x0207 (Routing Key), 0x0208 (Registration Result), 0x0209 (Deregistration Result) 0x020a (Local Routing Key Identifier), 0x020b (Destination Point Code), 0x020c (Service Indicators) 0x020d (Subsystem Numbers), 0x020e (Originating Point Code List), 0x020f (Circuit Range), 0x0212 (Registration Status), 0x0213 (Deregistration Status) are parameters in optional message, and therefore no action is specified.
| +| 3.3 Transfer messages | These messages are mandatory at the interfaces A and C. | +| 3.3.1 Payload Data Message (DATA) |The parameters Network Appearance, Routing Context, Correlation ID are optional
The parameter Protocol data is mandatory.
| +| 3.4 SS7 signalling network management messages | Heading | +| 3.4.1 Destination Unavailable (DUNA) |The message is mandatory at the interface C.
The parameters Network Appearance, Routing Context, and INFO String are optional
The parameter Affected Point Code is mandatory
| +| 3.4.2 Destination Available (DAVA) |The message is mandatory at the interface C
The parameters Network Appearance, Routing Context, and INFO String are optional.
The parameter Affected Point Code is mandatory
| +| 3.4.3 Destination State Audit (DAUD) |The message is mandatory at the interface C
The parameters Network Appearance, Routing Context, and INFO String are optional.
The parameter Affected Point Code is mandatory
| + +| Section number in M3UA RFC | Comments | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 3.4.4 Signalling Congestion (SCON) | The message is mandatory at the interface CThis procedure is mandatory at the interface C and is a subset of the procedure used at interface A. See also 4.3.4.1.2.
Note: The registration procedure is optional.
A received ASP Up must be acknowledged by an ASP Up Ack message, if no restriction applies e.g. maintenance.
| +| 4.3.4.1.1 M3UA Version Control | This procedure is mandatory at the interfaces A and C. | +| 4.3.4.1.2 IPSP Considerations (Asp Up) |This procedure is mandatory at the interface A.
All comments applicable for section 4.3.4.1 and 4.3.4.2 are also applicable for this section.
| +| 4.3.4.2 ASP-Down Procedure |This procedure is mandatory at the interface C and is a subset of the procedure used at interface A. See also 4.3.4.1.2.
A received ASP Down message must be acknowledged by an ASP Down Ack message, if no restriction applies eg maintenance reason.
| +| 4.3.4.3 ASP Active Procedure |This procedure is mandatory at interface C and is a subset of the procedure used at interface A. See also 4.3.4.3.1.
Configuration data define which AS an ASP is a member of. The ASP Active message does not contain a Routing Context parameter. Consequently, the ASP Active Ack message does not include any Routing Context(s) parameter.
The traffic state an ASP has, is configured within the associated Application Server. If more than one physical entity (ASPs, SGPs or IPSPs) implements a logical entity (SG, AS) then loadshare with 1+k is the mandatory traffic mode.
A received ASP Active must be acknowledged by an ASP Active Ack message, if no restriction applies e.g. maintenance reason.
If a Routing Context parameter is included in the ASP Active message it is not needed to include the Routing Context parameter in the ASP Active Ack message.
Note: This is a deviation to RFC 4666.
| +| 4.3.4.3.1 IPSP Considerations (ASP Active) |This procedure is mandatory at the interface A.
All comments applicable for section 4.3.4.3 are also applicable for this section.
| +| 4.3.4.4 ASP Inactive Procedures |This procedure is mandatory at the interface C and is a subset of the procedure used at interface A. See also 4.3.4.4.1.
Configuration data defines which AS an ASP is a member of.
It is optional to send several ASP Active Ack messages in response to a single ASP Active message.
A received ASP Inactive must be acknowledged by an ASP Inactive Ack message, if no restriction applies e.g. maintenance.
The sending of Notify message is mandatory if the As state is changed.
| +| 4.3.4.4.1 IPSP Considerations (ASP Inactive) |This procedure is mandatory at the interface A.
All comments applicable for section 4.3.4.4 are also applicable for this section.
| + +| Section number in M3UA RFC | Comments | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 4.3.4.5 Notify Procedures | The procedure is mandatory at the interfaces A and C to reflect an AS state change. | +| 4.3.4.6 Heartbeat Procedures | The procedure is optional. | +| 4.4 Routing Key management procedure | The procedure is optional. | +| 4.5 Procedures to Support the Availability or Congestion Status of SS7 Destination | Heading | +| 4.5.1 At an SGP |Note: The use of Transfer restricted message is a national option and is about the scope of this specification.
If the SG knows that the ASP supports DRST, then SG shall Send a DRST message, if the SG does not know whether the ASP supports the DRST message the SGW shall send a DAVA message if the destination earlier was unavailable. If the destination was available then no action is required.
| +| 4.5.2 At an ASP | Heading | +| 4.5.2.1 Single SG Configurations | It is mandatory for an ASP to interoperate with one Signaling Gateway. | +| 4.5.2.2 Multiple SG Configurations | It shall be possible to configure an ASP to handle at least a configuration consisting of two Signalling Gateways. | +| 4.5.3 ASP Auditing | Only the part related to international use in Q.704 is inside the scope of this annex. | +| 4.6 MTP 3 restart | The procedure is mandatory. | +| 5. Examples of M3UA Procedures | Descriptive text | +| 5.1. Establishment of Association and Traffic between SGPs and ASPs | Note The procedures defined in the sub-sections to 5.1 are a subset of the procedures defined in section 5.5. | +| 5.1.1 Single ASP in an Application Server ("1+0" sparing) | Descriptive text | +| 5.1.1.1 Single ASP in an Application Server ("1+0" sparing), No Registration | The use of RCn is optional. | +| 5.1.1.2 Single ASP in Application Server ("1+0" sparing), Dynamic Registration | The use of dynamic registration is optional. | +| 5.1.1.3 Single ASP in Multiple Application Servers (each with "1+0" sparing), Dynamic Registration (Case 1 - Multiple Registration Requests) | The use of dynamic registration is optional. | +| 5.1.1.4 Single ASP in Multiple Application Servers (each with "1+0" sparing), Dynamic Registration (Case 2 - Single Registration Request) | The use of dynamic registration is optional. | +| 5.1.2 Two ASPs in Application Server ("1+1" sparing) | This procedure is optional. | +| 5.1.3 Two ASPs in an Application Server ("1+1" sparing, loadsharing case). | The traffic mode parameter is optional in ASP-Active message | +| 5.1.4 Three ASPs in an Application Server ("n+k" sparing, loadsharing case) | The procedure is optional. | +| 5.2 ASP Traffic Failover Examples | Heading | + +| Section number in M3UA RFC | Comments | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5.2.1 (1+1 Sparing, Withdrawal of ASP, Backup Override) | The use of the procedure "backup override" is optional. | +| 5.2.2 (1+1 Sparing, Backup Override) | The use of the procedure "backup override" is optional. | +| 5.2.3 (n+k Sparing, Loadsharing case, Withdrawal of ASP) | The procedure is optional | +| 5.3 Normal Withdrawal of an ASP from an Application Server and Teardown of an Association | The registration procedure is optional. Routing Contexts (RC) is optional. | +| 5.3.X Normal Withdrawal of the ASP from an Application Server (1+1 sparing) loadsharing and Teardown of Association |Image: Sequence diagram showing the withdrawal of ASP 2 and ASP 1 from an SGP. The sequence is: 1. ASP 2 sends ASP Inactive to SGP; SGP responds with ASP Inactive Ack. 2. ASP 1 sends ASP Inactive to SGP; SGP responds with ASP Inactive Ack. 3. SGP sends Notify to ASP 2. 4. ASP 2 sends ASP Down to SGP; SGP responds with ASP Down Ack. 5. SGP sends Notify to ASP 1. 6. ASP 1 sends ASP Down to SGP; SGP responds with ASP Down Ack.
The figure is added for clarification.
| +| 5.4. Auditing Examples | Heading | +| 5.4.1. SG State: Uncongested/Available | Descriptive text. | +| 5.4.2. SG State: Congested (Congestion Level=2) /Available | Descriptive text. | +| 5.4.3. SG State: Unknown/Available | Descriptive text. | +| 5.4.4. SG State: Unavailable | Descriptive text. | +| 5.5 M3UA/MTP3-User Boundary Examples | Heading | +| 5.5.1 At an ASP | Heading | +| 5.5.1.1 Support for MTP-TRANSFER Primitives at the ASP | Heading | +| 5.5.1.1.1 Support for MTP-TRANSFER Request Primitive | The procedure is mandatory at the interface A and C. This description is also applicable for an IPSP, so replace the abbreviation ASP with ASP/IPSP and SGP with SGP/IPSP | +| 5.5.1.1.2 Support for the MTP-TRANSFER Indication Primitive | The support is mandatory at the interface A and C. This description is also applicable for an IPSP, so replace the abbreviation ASP with ASP/IPSP and SGP with SGP/IPSP. | +| 5.5.1.1.3 Support for ASP Querying of SS7 Destination States | This procedure is mandatory at the interface C. The querying of congestion states is an optional national procedure and outside the scope of this annex. | +| 5.5.2 At an SGP | Heading | +| 5.5.2.1 Support for MTP-TRANSFER Request Primitive at the SGP | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C. Network Appearance is optional. | + +| Section number in M3UA RFC | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 5.5.2.2 Support for MTP-TRANSFER Indication Primitive at the SGP | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C | +| 5.5.2.3 Support for MTP-PAUSE, MTP-RESUME, MTP-STATUS Indication Primitives | Heading | +| 5.5.2.3.1 Destination Unavailable | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C | +| 5.5.2.3.2 Destination Available | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C | +| 5.5.2.3.3 SS7 Network Congestion | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C | +| 5.5.2.3.4 Destination User Part Unavailable | The procedure is mandatory at the interface C and optional at the interface A. | +| 5.6 Examples for IPSP communication. | Descriptive text. | + +# Annex B (Informative): The use of M2PA in 3GPP networks + +## B.1 Scope + +This annex defines the application of M2PA in 3GPP core networks as an option on interface B. The purpose of the Annex is to ensure the interoperability of different implementations of M2PA as used by different operators and vendors. This is achieved by: + +- Clarifying certain concepts which are used in RFC 4165; +- Defining those features in RFC 4165 for which support is mandatory; +- Defining those features in the RFC 4165 for which support is optional; +- Defining those features in RFC 4165 which shall not be used; + +This specification is intended for interfaces between network domains. However, it can also be used inside one network domain, and constitutes, in that case, a minimum set of M2PA requirements to be supported between IP nodes and between SRP nodes in a 3GPP network. + +## B.2 Introduction + +M2PA may be used between SRPs, i.e. interface B (refer to Figure 1 of Annex A). + +Figure 2 recommends how M2PA is used in a 3GPP IP based signalling network. + + + +Diagram illustrating the use of M2PA in 3GPP core networks. It shows two network domains connected via a series of nodes. The left domain is a 3GPP IP based signalling network containing three SG (Signalling Gateway) nodes and two SP (Service Point) nodes. The SG nodes are connected in a chain: SG - M2PA -> SG - MTP3/M2PA -> SG. The SP nodes are connected to the SG nodes. The right domain is an SS7 signalling network based on MTP3/MTP2. The connection between the two domains is via the third SG node, which is connected to the SS7 network through an MTP3/MTP2 interface. + +Figure B2.1: Use of M2PA in 3GPP core networks + +## B.3 Protocol conformance to RFC 4165 + +A minimum implementation shall support sections marked mandatory in the table below. It shall be possible to configure all implementations to interoperate (no error messages returned) with the minimum set. + +The table below makes comment to the sections in RFC 4165. In the comment column the following terms are used: + +- Mandatory: When support of text in a section is marked mandatory: + - On an information element, message or message class, it means that a receiver shall understand the information element, message or message class and carry out the requested action. + - For a procedure, it means that the procedure is mandatory to be carried out by the involved network elements. + +- Optional: When support of the text in a section is marked optional the feature involved is only guaranteed to work between peer entities which are subject to a bilateral agreement between operators of those entities. If one end uses an optional information element and the other does not support it, then a silent discard takes place of an information element as a part of the message. This is described as part of the handling of the optionality in the table. +- Excluded: This means that the feature shall not be used in a 3GPP environment + +Descriptive text means that the section does not include any requirements for this specification. + +Note: The word "heading" means that the section consists only of subordinate sections. + +The comments column also defines the behaviour of a minimum implementation if it does not support a message or an information element in a mandatory message. + + + +| Section number in M2PA RFC | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Abstract | Descriptive text | +| 1.Introduction | Descriptive text | +| 1.1 Scope | Descriptive text | +| 1.2 Terminology | Descriptive text. | +| 1.3 Abbreviations | Descriptive text. | +| 1.4 Conventions | Descriptive text. | +| 1.5. Signaling Transport Architecture | Descriptive text | +| 1.5.1 Point Code Representation | Mandatory | +| 1.6 Services Provided by M2PA | Descriptive text | +| 1.6.1 Support for MTP Level 2 / MTP Level 3 Interface Boundary | Mandatory | +| 1.6.2 Support for Peer-to-Peer Communication | Mandatory | +| 1.7. Functions Provided by M2PA | Heading | +| 1.7.1 MTP2 Functionality | Descriptive text | +| 1.7.2 Mapping of SS7 and IP Entities | Mandatory | +| 1.7.3 SCTP Association Management | Mandatory | +| 1.7.4 Retention of MTP3 in the SS7 Network | Descriptive text | +| 1.8. Definition of the M2PA Boundaries | Heading | +| 1.8.1 Definition of the M2PA/MTP Level3 Boundaries | Descriptive text | +| 1.8.2 Definition of the Lower Layer Boundary between M2PA and SCTP | Descriptive text | +| 1.9. Differences Between M2PA and M2UA | Descriptive text | +| 2. Protocol Elements | Mandatory | +| 2.1 Common message header | Mandatory | +| 2.1.1 Version: | Mandatory | +| 2.1.2 Spare | Mandatory | +| 2.1.3 Message class | Mandatory | +| 2.1.4 Message Type | Mandatory | +| 2.1.5 Message Length | Mandatory | +| 2.2 M2PA Header | Mandatory | +| 2.2.1 Backward Sequence Number (BSN) | Mandatory | +| 2.2.2 Forward Sequence Number (FSN) | Mandatory | +| 2.3 M2PA Messages | Mandatory | +| 2.3.1 User Data | Mandatory | +| 2.3.2 Link Status | Mandatory | +| 2.3.2.1 Link Status Proving | Mandatory | +| 3 State Control | Heading | +| 3.1 SCTP Association State Control | Descriptive text | +| 3.2 M2PA Link State Control | Descriptive text | +| 4 Procedures | Mandatory | +| 4.1 Procedures to Support MTP2 Feature | Heading | +| 4.1.1 Signal Unit Format, Delimitation, Acceptance | Descriptive text | +| 4.1.2 MTP and SCTP Entities |The content about how M2PA relates MTP and SCTP entities is Descriptive text.
The relationship between the streams of SCTP and M2PA Messages is mandatory.
| +| 4.1.3 Link Alignment | The procedure is Mandatory. | +| 4.1.4 Processor Outage | Mandatory | +| 4.1.5 Level 2 Flow Control | Mandatory | +| 4.1.6 Link Out of Service | Mandatory | +| 4.1.7 SCTP Association Problems | Mandatory | +| 4.1.8 Transmission and Reception Priorities | Mandatory | +| 4.1.9 M2PA Version Control | Mandatory | +| 4.2. Procedures to Support the MTP3/MTP2 Interface | Heading | +| 4.2.1 Sending and Receiving Messages | Mandatory | +| 4.2.2 MTP3 Signaling Link Congestion | Mandatory | +| 4.2.3 Changeover | Mandatory | +| 4.2.3.1 Multiple User Data Streams and Changeover | Descriptive text | +| 4.3 SCTP Considerations | Descriptive text | +| 4.3.1 SCTP Slow Start |Descriptive text
Avoiding the negative effects of slow start is Mandatory.
| + +| Section number in M2PA RFC | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 5 Examples of M2PA Procedures | Descriptive text | +| 5.1 Link Initialization (Alignment) | Descriptive text | +| 5.2 Message Transmission and Reception | Descriptive text | +| 5.3 Link Status Indication | Descriptive text | +| 5.4 Link Status Message (Processor Outage) | Descriptive text | +| 5.5 Level 2 Flow Control | Descriptive text | +| 5.6 MTP3 Signaling Link Congestion | Descriptive text | +| 5.7. Link Deactivation | Descriptive text | +| 5.8 Link Changeover | Descriptive text | + +# Annex C (informative): Change history + +| Date | TSG # | TSG Doc. | CR | Rev | Subject/Comment | New | +|----------|--------|-----------|------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Feb 2001 | | | | | Initial draft | 0.0.2 | +| Feb 2001 | | | | | Second draft | 0.1.0 | +| Feb 2001 | | | | | Contributions and comments from TSG-CN WG4#6.1 Madrid Ad Hoc incorporated | 0.2.0 | +| Feb 2001 | | | | | Contributions and comments from TSG-CN WG4#6.1 Madrid Ad Hoc incorporated and draft further elaborated | 2.0.0 | +| Mar 2001 | | | | | Comments from TSG-CN WG4#7 incorporated. | 2.1.0 | +| Mar 2001 | CN#11 | NP-010079 | | | Annex A: M3UA updated to the latest available version 6 Approved in CN#11 | 4.0.0 | +| May 2001 | | | | | Foreword added | 4.0.1 | +| Sep 2001 | CN#13 | NP-010452 | 001 | | Change of M 3UA version | 4.1.0 | +| Sep 2001 | CN#13 | | | | Editorial clean up | 4.1.0 | +| Jun 2002 | CN#16 | | | | Corrupted Figure 5.3/1 fixed | 4.1.1 | +| Jun 2002 | CN#16 | | | | Rel-5 created after CN#16 | 5.0.0 | +| Sep 2002 | CN#17 | NP-020445 | 003 | 1 | Add reference to new IETF RFC on SCTP Checksum | 5.1.0 | +| Dec 2002 | CN#18 | NP-020585 | 007 | 2 | M3UA for 3GPP networks | 5.2.0 | +| Dec 2002 | CN#18 | NP-020585 | 009 | | IETF RFC reference for M3UA | 5.2.0 | +| Dec 2004 | CN#26 | | | | Rel-6 created after CN#26 | 6.0.0 | +| Jun 2007 | CT#36 | | | | Upgraded unchanged from Rel-6 | 7.0.0 | +| Jun 2007 | CT#36 | CP-070330 | 0013 | 3 | Use of M2PA in 3GPP core network signalling system | 8.0.0 | +| Sep 2007 | CT#37 | CP-070545 | 0014 | 2 | Protocol conformance to RFC4165(M2PA) | 8.1.0 | +| Sep 2007 | CT#37 | CP-070545 | 0015 | 2 | Change of protocol conformance to M3UA | 8.1.0 | +| Dec 2008 | CT#42 | | | | Copyright Notification updated | 8.1.1 | +| 2009-12 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-9 version (MCC) | 9.0.0 | +| 2011-03 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-10 version (MCC) | 10.0.0 | +| 2011-03 | CT#52 | CP-110371 | 0016 | | Removing reference to draft-ietf-sigtran-m3ua-implementors-guide-01 | 10.1.0 | +| 2012-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-11 version (MCC) | 11.0.0 | +| 2014-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-12 version (MCC) | 12.0.0 | +| 2015-12 | CT#70 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) | 13.0.0 | +| 2017-03 | CT#75 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-14 version (MCC) | 14.0.0 | +| 2018-06 | CT#80 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-15 version (MCC) | 15.0.0 | +| 2020-07 | CT#88e | - | - | - | Update to Rel-16 version (MCC) | 16.0.0 | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/088921fa3f5a44c8551815122517eefd_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/088921fa3f5a44c8551815122517eefd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94e7ddc27139ef46286bdc46abb48e84b1cb78c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/088921fa3f5a44c8551815122517eefd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1df334847fe5d0be3e862f97bf36031af96619bbd02f336a89903768a61aca32 +size 82256 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/08c7a76a7786bd08b99dd4cb41583ef4_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/08c7a76a7786bd08b99dd4cb41583ef4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..109a7b2e8ebfc99981f9735ab02363a7c23ee7ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/08c7a76a7786bd08b99dd4cb41583ef4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:26b81e468be6612b26928b7eb4d2c2cab0059307cd99ceca63be9bc8c842c990 +size 36341 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/0b87abe67b21a93777287649c33e755d_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/0b87abe67b21a93777287649c33e755d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc7793304db7d12e9a3efd3eecdd78ea673e344f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/0b87abe67b21a93777287649c33e755d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3da1188d50ea186818580ca733e141f1a24508623426d0f9a3c4688c06991e9b +size 67665 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3799686114eee6e117f546906d648757008d63b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e6b16681e53554f5fb504d1297b5f6f09f53e0507e09313af850dc19cca5035a +size 82056 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/26d664119ad25250780f554633444e54_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/26d664119ad25250780f554633444e54_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ace3e96f9a656b62935eee2c5fe0d20adf5162b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/26d664119ad25250780f554633444e54_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:884d097ea545accb61c51c5db4835c8f676d9d8fa0cfd7ed973c66939f177c99 +size 72912 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/49ee89a1d5852ab005dbbab6de09a8a6_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/49ee89a1d5852ab005dbbab6de09a8a6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b635b999bcbe12ae5578d97d185d5ca0c16137c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/49ee89a1d5852ab005dbbab6de09a8a6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1a631c2b288b70963dbcf661fdd2c9c22f3ae60d8529be71733a2f0b72dd3d00 +size 53806 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5860ad6bd2a2dd8d1ab12864b8f90f37_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5860ad6bd2a2dd8d1ab12864b8f90f37_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd4119d3f3faa99545bb92c85e182ec98ecffe36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5860ad6bd2a2dd8d1ab12864b8f90f37_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c0c556159292eb30b2dd51d65ce873ca74e5652a14ba16e159756b177b803667 +size 54159 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d404cbd24fc4357d50dd2bc17cc81c77389a890 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:beeb7f8c063755f3d8b23917bb4db53d6f6ca6881336458fce58ca83032cb508 +size 69934 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/6629e8a87e7552e2454b7c3e9f6d73a0_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/6629e8a87e7552e2454b7c3e9f6d73a0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d79378664d3ad92b41a0879157081344e7e9a445 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/6629e8a87e7552e2454b7c3e9f6d73a0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cd2e5bc191b052b7b5fa0165f540d6fc775317d1672841f7d87da8465cb82bc8 +size 33166 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c27ac7391bc7cf6ea0212ef6ab58d7b8d8d0e683 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6e180e019fbd2166d280285e1bb1f9ecc5c28a52fabee332da2ca67d59c2a457 +size 104621 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bc7aa7327cbb8d10781217bc4e3ad3597eedb85 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:832fe8d7c19f1e36c3672d9607f49e0a74721333e2702971218b5dcd95a9d92a +size 83725 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6315e9e9916f88f85268c57f306638dbe798ff0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d4e146977ef4ec21b10c624413a58935cd5bee0518563062ab3217138e6ff2dc +size 72387 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ab835f5948f3e05ae060050588b06c28da89b46 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:119cc7323fa6dbb57855c11ac2c28dff6d09f3ef5e6275afbcad9fdd9c98c3e6 +size 100345 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b96f0851267852f4c05b1aad9aa2a60475953cf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:00e1fd3fe0c6203932a64ffcfc95e0e60b7f3277b4207a6b5cfe4c12d31e58b5 +size 70841 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8fa679f79a1bb1f527cba9f29e784e89_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8fa679f79a1bb1f527cba9f29e784e89_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a924c281bfe715fb9dd7a9df4e6f214fde3414ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/8fa679f79a1bb1f527cba9f29e784e89_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:052a48fb8169559b2142c01bd072a192249d923fda7728e351a583bcbd5b2f52 +size 93128 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/9791722d75115ddcc599b07d7bc35d73_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/9791722d75115ddcc599b07d7bc35d73_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f45af4642a26637e81e1ce13eb14178129a67c53 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/9791722d75115ddcc599b07d7bc35d73_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2d0e72348415bde4d561515b2785a315448c089c6cde6a0c2896be84d863d6b1 +size 50911 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0b8b6f1bfcefe56bd2657438b6b3427179637de --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d19eef58e709fa9aabe1e43bf6ccb612ddfc2789edc1296848b1f9fd3b3c1afa +size 93048 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ae53f90bb87d6d09e2d6b5278d7c338f_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ae53f90bb87d6d09e2d6b5278d7c338f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea7152bdb5a2a480f2674b5eadc3dbb798d2cece --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ae53f90bb87d6d09e2d6b5278d7c338f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d5f8c9644b82e69b5ba3224a560ab744859e768a5334aa31a12dea443bf11ee7 +size 64191 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..970688db3271216ec4c9ff03086760f4fba4c65e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:75ee1482e2b319b465b6bf6a3b9b04290a4a3b0052b7c7daad646501d9daa8b5 +size 55025 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/daa4a6fa7e2ba1954258f86b4928eb32_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/daa4a6fa7e2ba1954258f86b4928eb32_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4561639e3f023fb3df66db087569900723a3ff0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/daa4a6fa7e2ba1954258f86b4928eb32_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f9a068f57805e185d26d05c4d3e5a5a7014fe4f822e222fdc174f933fdbdc28e +size 68883 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4a6421d425dbbb8c1560dc1ae28554062fef00a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae0655bb2b2c780042a149208ad6da8cba60c38a8b58ab83a8a1b28951c8eb8f +size 88585 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aca8cb499696df0dad7bd0c377f50660921dbfb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7b272b7aa49319f9c944d538e8a57271e8acb40334583dae298ae0f1861dd235 +size 65794 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd008e7b80f73151b3ad89102c252de3f93aba07 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:386d4d5702f988597a499adb0053a81e3c7583b753b59446f1b971267e8ee15f +size 57856 diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/raw.md b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c03dc64a85159bd73c3ce27c0a5b5f1722a777d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29204/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1102 @@ + + + + + + +# --- Contents + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| Foreword ..... | 4 | +| Introduction ..... | 4 | +| 1 Scope..... | 5 | +| 2 References..... | 5 | +| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 5 | +| 3.1 Definitions..... | 5 | +| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 6 | +| 4 Network architecture..... | 6 | +| 4.1 Scenarios ..... | 6 | +| 4.1.1 Outbound traffic (not yet protected) from own to foreign NE ..... | 7 | +| 4.1.2 Inbound traffic from foreign to own NE ..... | 7 | +| 4.1.3 Inbound transit traffic ..... | 8 | +| 4.1.4 Outbound transit traffic (not relayed)..... | 9 | +| 4.1.5 Outbound traffic from own to own NE ..... | 9 | +| 4.1.6 Inbound traffic from own to own NE ..... | 10 | +| 4.1.7 Outbound traffic from foreign to own NE..... | 11 | +| 4.1.8 Inbound traffic from own to foreign NE ..... | 11 | +| 4.1.9 Outbound traffic (already protected) from own to foreign NE ..... | 12 | +| 4.1.10 Outbound transit traffic (relayed by SRF)..... | 13 | +| 5 Detailed Behaviour of the SS7 Security Gateway ..... | 13 | +| 5.1 TCAP user traffic ..... | 13 | +| 5.1.1 General ..... | 13 | +| 5.1.2 Interactions with Mobile Number Portability..... | 28 | +| 5.1.3 Interactions with SCCP segmentation..... | 28 | +| 5.1.4 Protocol details ..... | 29 | +| 5.1.4.1 Transformation of unprotected message to protected message ..... | 29 | +| 5.1.4.2 Transformation of protected message to unprotected message ..... | 33 | +| 5.1.4.3 Handling of received XUDTS messages and UDTs messages ..... | 36 | +| Annex A (informative): Change history..... | 39 | + +# --- Foreword + +This Technical Specification has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). + +The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows: + +Version x.y.z + +where: + +- x the first digit: + - 1 presented to TSG for information; + - 2 presented to TSG for approval; + - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control. +- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc. +- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document. + +# --- Introduction + +The absence of security in Signalling System No. 7 (SS7) networks is an identified security weakness in 2G systems. This was formerly perceived not to be a problem, since the SS7 networks were the provinces of a small number of large institutions. This is no longer the case, and so there is now a need for security precautions. + +For 3G systems it is a clear goal to be able to protect inter-network SS7 signalling protocols. The protection is done by security gateways which are located at the network border. As a consequence intra network SS7 signalling is not protected and network elements other than Security Gateways are not impacted. + +# --- 1 Scope + +The present document provides functional description of the SS7 Security Gateway. The document covers also network architecture, routing considerations, and protocol details. + +# --- 2 References + +The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document. + +- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific. + - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply. + - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*. +- [1] 3GPP TS 29.002: "Mobile Application Part (MAP) specification". +- [2] 3GPP TS 29.078: "Customized Applications for Mobile network Enhanced Logic (CAMEL) Phase 4; CAMEL Application Part (CAP) specification". +- [3] ETSI ETS 300 358: "ISDN Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber (CCBS) supplementary service; Functional capabilities and information flows". +- [4] 3GPP TS 23.066: "Support of GSM Mobile Number Portability (MNP) stage 2". +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.773: "Specifications of Signalling System No.7; Transaction capabilities formats and encoding". +- [6] 3GPP TS 33.200: "3G Security; Network Domain Security (NDS); Mobile Application Part (MAP) application layer security". +- [7] ITU-T Recommendation E.164: "The international public telecommunication numbering plan". +- [8] 3GPP TS 33.204: "3G Security; Network Domain Security (NDS); Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP) user security". +- [9] ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.716 (07/96), White Book Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP). +- [10] 3GPP TS 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications". + +# --- 3 Definitions and abbreviations + +## 3.1 Definitions + +For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.905 [10] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905 [10]. + +| | | +|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TCAP user: | Application Part identified by one of the following SCCP Subsystem Numbers: | +| | 0000 0110 HLR (MAP) | +| | 0000 0111 VLR (MAP) | +| | 0000 1000 MSC (MAP) | +| | 0000 1001 EIR (MAP) | +| | 0000 1010 is allocated for evolution (possible Authentication Centre) | +| | 1001 0001 GMLC (MAP) | +| | 1001 0010 CAP | +| | 1001 0011 gsmSCF (MAP) or IM-SSF (MAP) or Presence Network Agent | + +| | | +|-----------|------------| +| 1001 0101 | SGSN (MAP) | +| 1001 0110 | GGSN (MAP) | +| 0000 1011 | SSAP | + +## 3.2 Abbreviations + +For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply: + +| | | +|--------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| CC | Country Code | +| GSMA | Global System for Mobile communications Association | +| IV | Initialisation Vector | +| MAC | Message Authentication Code | +| MNP | Mobile Number Portability | +| MSISDN | Mobile Station International ISDN Number | +| NDC | National Destination Code | +| NE | Network Entit | +| PLMN | Public Land Mobile Network y | +| RN | Routeing Number | +| SAD | Security Association Database | +| SEG | Security Gateway | +| SPD | Security Policy Database | +| SPI | Security Parameter Index | +| SRF | Signalling Relay Functio | +| TCAP | Transcation Capabilities Application Part | +| UDT | SCCP Unidata message | +| XUDT | SCCP Extended Unidata message n | + +# --- 4 Network architecture + +In a PLMN that employs SS7 Security Gateways all TCAP user signalling messages entering or leaving the PLMN have to transit an SS7 Security Gateway which belongs to the PLMN and which performs the protection of leaving (i.e. outbound) messages and the protection checking and de-protection or blocking of entering (i.e. inbound) messages. + +One or several SS7 Security Gateways may be employed within a PLMN. + +An SS7 Security Gateway may be co-located with any TCAP user NE or it may stand alone. However, for the purpose of this document and without imposing any restrictions, it is assumed that the SS7 Security Gateways is a stand alone entity. + +It is further assumed that the SS7 Security Gateways are located at the boarder of the PLMN i.e. inbound messages transit an SS7 Security Gateway before they reach any other node within the PLMN, and outbound messages transit an SS7 Security Gateway immediately before reaching a node outside the PLMN. + +SS7 routeing is not impacted by the SS7 Security Gateway Architecture. As a consequence SS7 Security Gateways are stateless at TCAP level: No TCAP dialogue states are maintained in the SS7 Security Gateway since the outbound dialogue request message may transit a different SS7 Security Gateway than the corresponding inbound dialogue response message; similarly the inbound dialogue request message may transit a different SS7 Security Gateway than the corresponding outbound dialogue response message. + +## 4.1 Scenarios + +SS7 Security Gateways perform protection, de-protection, blocking and unmodified passing of TCAP user messages depending on the scenario as described below: + +Note that scenarios 4.1.5, 4.1.6, 4.1.7, 4.1.8, and 4.1.9 are not applicable if all PLMN's TCAP user NEs are interconnected by PLMN internal signalling links and routing tables are set up not to allow these scenarios. + +### 4.1.1 Outbound traffic (not yet protected) from own to foreign NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.1. The message is originated at a NE inside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway. This SS7 Security Gateway protects the message + +according to the relevant Security Policy with the relevant Security Association. The message may then transit several nodes outside the PLMN (including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches its destination. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of an unprotected TCAP user message from a TCAP user NE within a PLMN cloud. The message path is: TCAP user NE → Transit Node → SS7 Security Gateway. From the SS7 Security Gateway, the message is shown as a protected TCAP user message exiting the PLMN towards a destination. Two lines from the label 'unprotected TCAP user message' point to the message path between the TCAP user NE and the SS7 Security Gateway. + +Diagram of outbound traffic from own to foreign NE + +Figure 4.1.1: Outbound traffic (not yet protected) from own to foreign NE + +### 4.1.2 Inbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.2. The message is originated at a NE outside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes (including an SS7 Security Gateway) outside the PLMN before it reaches the PLMN's SS7 Security Gateway. This SS7 Security Gateway checks whether the message is correctly protected according to the relevant security association. If it is not, the message is blocked (discarded), otherwise it is de-protected. To determine the relevant security association the fact that the message may have been relayed by an MNP-SRF in a transit network (see Clause 4.1.10 and 5.1.2) needs to be taken into account. After successful de-protection the message may then transit several nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the TCAP user NE. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of a protected TCAP user message from an origin outside the PLMN. The message path is: from origin → SS7 Security Gateway → Transit Node → TCAP user NE. The message is shown as a protected TCAP user message entering the PLMN through the SS7 Security Gateway. Two lines from the label 'unprotected TCAP user message' point to the message path between the SS7 Security Gateway and the TCAP user NE. + +Diagram of inbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +Figure 4.1.2: Inbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +### 4.1.3 Inbound transit traffic + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.3. The message is originated at a NE outside the transit PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes outside the transit PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in inbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway passes the message unmodified. The message may then transit several transit nodes inside the transit PLMN, another SS7 Security Gateway of the transit PLMN in outbound direction (see Clause 4.1.4), and several transit nodes outside the transit and destination PLMN (potentially including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches the destination PLMN. + +Note: A PLMN operator may decide not to act as transit network for specific or all combinations of origin and destination. In this case the SS7 Security Gateway may block the inbound message. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of inbound transit traffic within a PLMN. An orange cloud represents the PLMN. An arrow labeled 'from origin' points to a red box labeled 'SS7 Security Gateway' located outside the cloud. From this gateway, an arrow points into the cloud to a cyan box labeled 'Transit Node'. From the 'Transit Node', an arrow points to a blue box labeled 'SS7 SEG' located at the bottom of the cloud. An arrow labeled 'to destination' points from the 'SS7 SEG' out of the cloud. A label 'protected or unprotected TCAP user message' is shown with lines pointing to the arrows entering and leaving the 'SS7 Security Gateway' and the 'SS7 SEG'. + +Diagram of Inbound transit traffic + +Figure 4.1.3: Inbound transit traffic + +### 4.1.4 Outbound transit traffic (not relayed) + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.4. The message is originated at a NE outside the transit PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes outside the transit PLMN (including an SS7 Security Gateway), an SS7 Security Gateway of the transit PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.3), and several transit nodes inside the transit PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in outbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway passes the message unmodified. The message may then transit several transit nodes outside the transit and destination PLMN (potentially including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches the destination PLMN. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of outbound transit traffic within a PLMN. An arrow labeled 'from origin' points to an 'SS7 SEG' box. From the 'SS7 SEG', an arrow points to a 'Transit Node' box. From the 'Transit Node', an arrow points to an 'SS7 Security Gateway' box. From the 'SS7 Security Gateway', an arrow points to 'to destination'. A label 'protected or unprotected TCAP user message' has lines pointing to the arrows between the 'SS7 SEG' and 'Transit Node', and between the 'Transit Node' and 'SS7 Security Gateway'. The entire path is contained within an orange cloud labeled 'PLMN'. + +Figure 4.1.4: Outbound transit traffic (not relayed). A diagram showing a message path within a PLMN cloud. The path starts from an origin, goes to an SS7 SEG, then to a Transit Node, and finally to an SS7 Security Gateway, which then points to the destination. Labels include 'from origin', 'protected or unprotected TCAP user message', 'PLMN', 'SS7 SEG', 'Transit Node', 'SS7 Security Gateway', and 'to destination'. + +Figure 4.1.4: Outbound transit traffic (not relayed) + +### 4.1.5 Outbound traffic from own to own NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.5. The message is originated at a NE inside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in outbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway protects the message according to the relevant Security Association. The message may then transit several transit nodes outside the PLMN, another SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.6) and several transit nodes within the PLMN before it reaches the destination NE inside the PLMN. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of outbound traffic from an own NE to another own NE within a PLMN. Two yellow boxes labeled 'TCAP user NE' are inside an orange cloud labeled 'PLMN'. Arrows from these boxes point to blue boxes labeled 'Transit Node'. One 'Transit Node' points to a red box labeled 'SS7 Security Gateway'. An arrow from the 'SS7 Security Gateway' points to a blue box labeled 'Transit Node' outside the cloud. From this 'Transit Node', an arrow points to a blue box labeled 'SS7 SEG'. From the 'SS7 SEG', an arrow points to a blue box labeled 'Transit Node' inside the cloud. From this 'Transit Node', an arrow points to a yellow box labeled 'TCAP user NE'. A label 'unprotected TCAP user message' has lines pointing to the arrows between the 'TCAP user NE' boxes and the 'Transit Node' boxes. A label 'protected TCAP user message' has lines pointing to the arrows between the 'SS7 Security Gateway' and the 'Transit Node' box outside the cloud, and between the 'SS7 SEG' and the 'Transit Node' box inside the cloud. + +Figure 4.1.5: Outbound traffic from own to own NE. A diagram showing a message path within a PLMN cloud. Two 'TCAP user NE' boxes point to 'Transit Node' boxes. One 'Transit Node' points to an 'SS7 Security Gateway' box, which then points to another 'Transit Node' box outside the PLMN cloud. The second 'Transit Node' points to an 'SS7 SEG' box, which then points to another 'Transit Node' box inside the PLMN cloud. The second 'Transit Node' points to a 'TCAP user NE' box. Labels include 'unprotected TCAP user message', 'PLMN', 'TCAP user NE', 'Transit Node', 'SS7 Security Gateway', 'SS7 SEG', and 'protected TCAP user message'. + +Figure 4.1.5: Outbound traffic from own to own NE + +### 4.1.6 Inbound traffic from own to own NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.6. The message is originated at a NE inside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN, an SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in outbound direction (see Clause 4.1.5), and several + +transit nodes outside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in inbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway checks whether the message is correctly protected according to the relevant Security Association. If it is not, the message is blocked (discarded), otherwise it is de-protected. The message may then transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the destination NE inside the PLMN. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of an unprotected TCAP user message within a PLMN. Two yellow boxes labeled 'TCAP user NE' are shown inside an orange cloud representing the PLMN. Arrows from these boxes point to cyan boxes labeled 'Transit Node'. From the top 'Transit Node', an arrow points to a purple box labeled 'SS7 SEG'. From the 'SS7 SEG', a red arrow points to another cyan 'Transit Node' outside the PLMN. From this external 'Transit Node', a red arrow points to a red box labeled 'SS7 Security Gateway'. From the 'SS7 Security Gateway', a red arrow points back to the external 'Transit Node', and then a red arrow points back into the PLMN to the bottom 'Transit Node'. Finally, an arrow points from the bottom 'Transit Node' to the bottom 'TCAP user NE'. The text 'unprotected TCAP user message' is on the left, and 'protected TCAP user message' is on the right, indicating the state of the message after passing through the security gateway. + +Diagram of inbound traffic from own to own NE within a PLMN. + +Figure 4.1.6: Inbound traffic from own to own NE + +### 4.1.7 Outbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.7. The message is originated at a NE outside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes outside the PLMN, an SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.2), and several transit nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in outbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway protects the message according to the reverse relevant Security Association. The message may then transit several transit nodes outside the PLMN, another SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.2) and several transit nodes within the PLMN before it reaches the destination NE inside the PLMN. + + + +This diagram illustrates the flow of outbound traffic from a foreign network element (NE) to an own NE within a PLMN. The PLMN is represented by an orange cloud. The traffic path is as follows: an arrow labeled 'from origin' points to an external SS7 SEG; from the SS7 SEG, a black arrow points to a Transit Node inside the PLMN; from this Transit Node, a black arrow points to an SS7 Security Gateway; from the SS7 Security Gateway, a red arrow points to another external Transit Node; from this external Transit Node, a red arrow points to another external SS7 SEG; from this SS7 SEG, a black arrow points to a second Transit Node inside the PLMN; from this second Transit Node, a black arrow points to a TCAP user NE. A white box labeled 'unprotected TCAP user message' is positioned near the first Transit Node, and a white box labeled 'protected TCAP user message' is positioned near the second SS7 SEG. + +Diagram of outbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +Figure 4.1.7: Outbound traffic from foreign to own NE + +### 4.1.8 Inbound traffic from own to foreign NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.8. The message is originated at a NE inside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN, an SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in outbound direction (see Clause 4.1.1), and several transit nodes outside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in inbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway checks whether the message is correctly protected according to the relevant security association. If it is not, the message is blocked (discarded); otherwise it is passed unmodified. The message may then transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN, another SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in outbound direction (see Clause 4.1.9) and several transit nodes outside the PLMN (including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches the destination NE outside the PLMN. + + + +This diagram illustrates the flow of inbound traffic from an own NE to a foreign NE within a PLMN. The PLMN is represented by an orange cloud. The traffic path is as follows: a yellow box labeled 'TCAP user NE' sends a black arrow labeled 'unprotected TCAP user message' to a Transit Node inside the PLMN; from this Transit Node, a black arrow points to an SS7 SEG; from the SS7 SEG, a red arrow points to an external Transit Node; from this external Transit Node, a red arrow points to an SS7 Security Gateway; from the SS7 Security Gateway, a red arrow points to another external Transit Node; from this external Transit Node, a red arrow points to another external SS7 SEG; from this SS7 SEG, a black arrow points to a second Transit Node inside the PLMN; from this second Transit Node, a black arrow points to an arrow labeled 'to destination'. A white box labeled 'protected TCAP user message' is positioned near the second SS7 SEG. + +Diagram of inbound traffic from own to foreign NE + +Figure 4.1.8: Inbound traffic from own to foreign NE + +### 4.1.9 Outbound traffic (already protected) from own to foreign NE + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.9. The message is originated at a NE inside the PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes inside the PLMN, an SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in outbound direction (see Clause 4.1.1), several transit nodes outside the PLMN, an SS7 Security Gateway of the PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.8), and several transit nodes inside the PLMN before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway. This SS7 Security Gateway passes the message unmodified. The message may then transit several transit nodes outside the PLMN (including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches the destination NE outside the PLMN. + + + +The diagram illustrates the path of a TCAP user message within a PLMN (represented by an orange cloud). A yellow box labeled 'TCAP user NE' originates an 'unprotected TCAP user message' (black arrow). The message flows through a 'Transit Node' (cyan box) to an 'SS7 SEG' (purple box). From the SS7 SEG, it passes through another 'Transit Node' and then to a second 'SS7 Security Gateway' (purple box with a red border). The message is then shown as a 'protected TCAP user message' (red arrow) exiting the PLMN towards the 'destination'. + +Diagram of outbound traffic (already protected) from own to foreign NE + +Figure 4.1.9: Outbound traffic (already protected) from own to foreign NE + +### 4.1.10 Outbound transit traffic (relayed by SRF) + +This scenario is shown in figure 4.1.10. The message (originally destined for the PLMN) is originated at a NE outside the transit PLMN. It may transit several transit nodes outside the transit PLMN (including an SS7 Security Gateway), an SS7 Security Gateway of the transit PLMN in inbound direction (see Clause 4.1.2), several transit nodes inside the transit PLMN, and an MNP-SRF which replaces the SCCP called party address of the message before it reaches the SS7 Security Gateway in outbound direction. This SS7 Security Gateway recognizes that the message was relayed by an SRF by analyzing the SCCP called party address and protects the message with the relevant Security Association. The message may then transit several transit nodes outside the transit and destination PLMN (potentially including an SS7 Security Gateway) before it reaches the destination PLMN. + + + +The diagram illustrates the flow of outbound transit traffic within a PLMN (represented by an orange cloud). A red arrow labeled 'from origin' points to an 'SS7 SEG' (blue box). From the 'SS7 SEG', a black arrow points to an 'MNP SRF' (pink box). From the 'MNP SRF', a black arrow points to an 'SS7 Security Gateway' (blue box with a red border). A red arrow labeled 'to destination' exits the 'SS7 Security Gateway'. A line labeled 'protected TCAP user message' originates from the 'SS7 SEG' and points to the 'SS7 Security Gateway'. Another line labeled 'unprotected TCAP user message' originates from the 'MNP SRF' and points to the 'SS7 Security Gateway'. + +Diagram of outbound transit traffic relayed by SRF within a PLMN. + +Figure 4.1.10: Outbound transit traffic (relayed by SRF) + +# 5 Detailed Behaviour of the SS7 Security Gateway + +## 5.1 TCAP user traffic + +### 5.1.1 General + +With regard to TCAP user traffic the SS7 Security Gateway performs message protection, protection checking and de-protection, transparent passing, and blocking of messages depending on the message's origin (SCCP calling party address), the message's destination (SCCP called party address), and the message's direction (inbound or outbound) as shown in figure 5.1.1. + + + +procedure SS7\_Security\_Gateway + +1(2) + +Procedure in the SS7 Security Gateway + +``` +graph TD; Idle([Idle]) --> TCAP[TCAP user message]; TCAP --> CheckDir[Check direction]; CheckDir --> INBOUND[INBOUND]; CheckDir --> OUTBOUND[OUTBOUND]; CheckDir --> NotCrossing[not crossing PLMN boundary]; INBOUND --> IN((IN)); OUTBOUND --> OUT((OUT)); NotCrossing --> Pass1((pass)); IN --> CheckOD[check origin and destination]; CheckOD --> OwnToOwn[own to own]; CheckOD --> OwnToForeign[own to foreign]; CheckOD --> ForeignToOwn[foreign to own]; CheckOD --> ForeignToForeign[foreign to foreign]; OwnToOwn --> InboundOwnToOwn[Inbound_own_to_own]; OwnToForeign --> InboundOwnToForeign[Inbound_own_to_foreign]; ForeignToOwn --> InboundForeignToOwn[Inbound_foreign_to_own]; ForeignToForeign --> Pass2((pass)); InboundOwnToOwn --> Result{result = block}; InboundOwnToForeign --> Result; InboundForeignToOwn --> Result; Result --> Yes[yes]; Result --> No[no]; Yes --> Block((block)); No --> Pass3((pass)); +``` + +Flowchart for SS7 Security Gateway procedure. It starts with 'Idle', followed by 'TCAP user message', then 'Check direction'. It branches into 'INBOUND' (IN), 'OUTBOUND', and 'not crossing PLMN boundary' (pass). The 'IN' path leads to 'check origin and destination', which branches into 'own to own' (Inbound\_own\_to\_own), 'own to foreign' (Inbound\_own\_to\_foreign), 'foreign to own' (Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own), and 'foreign to foreign' (pass). The first three paths lead to a 'result = block' decision, which branches into 'yes' (block) and 'no' (pass). + +Figure 5.1.1 Process SS7 Security Gateway (sheet 1 of 2) + + + +procedure SS7\_Security\_Gateway 2(2) + +Procedure in +the SS7 Security +Gateway + +``` +graph TD; OUT((OUT)) --> check[check origin and destination]; check --> own_to_own[own to own]; check --> own_to_foreign[own to foreign]; check --> foreign_to_own[foreign to own]; check --> foreign_to_foreign[foreign to foreign]; own_to_own --> Outbound_own_to_own[Outbound_own_to_own]; own_to_foreign --> Outbound_own_to_foreign[Outbound_own_to_foreign]; foreign_to_own --> Outbound_foreign_to_own[Outbound_foreign_to_own]; foreign_to_foreign --> Outbound_foreign_to_foreign[Outbound_foreign_to_foreign]; Outbound_own_to_own --> pass1((pass)); Outbound_own_to_foreign --> pass1; Outbound_foreign_to_own --> pass1; Outbound_foreign_to_foreign --> pass1; pass1 --> block((block)); pass1 --> pass2((pass)); pass2 --> TCAP[TCAP user message]; block --> Idle([Idle]); TCAP --> Idle; +``` + +Flowchart for SS7\_Security\_Gateway procedure. It starts with 'OUT', followed by 'check origin and destination'. A decision point branches into four cases: 'own to own' (Outbound\_own\_to\_own), 'own to foreign' (Outbound\_own\_to\_foreign), 'foreign to own' (Outbound\_foreign\_to\_own), and 'foreign to foreign' (Outbound\_foreign\_to\_foreign). All four cases lead to a 'pass' connector. Below this, a 'block' connector and a 'pass' connector (leading to 'TCAP user message') both lead to an 'Idle' terminal. + +Figure 5.1.1 Process SS7 Security Gateway (sheet 2 of 2) + + + +macrodefinition Check\_Direction + +1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{previous node belongs to own PLMN}; D1 -- yes --> D2{next node belongs to own PLMN}; D1 -- no --> D3{next node belongs to own PLMN}; D2 -- yes --> E1(( )); E1 --> O1[not crossing PLMN boundary]; O1 --> OUTBOUND[OUTBOUND]; D2 -- no --> OUTBOUND; D3 -- yes --> E2(( )); E2 --> INBOUND[INBOUND]; D3 -- no --> E3(( )); E3 --> O2[not crossing PLMN boundary]; +``` + +Flowchart for macro Check\_Direction. It starts with a connector, then a decision 'previous node belongs to own PLMN'. If 'yes', it goes to another decision 'next node belongs to own PLMN'. If 'yes', it ends at 'not crossing PLMN boundary' (OUTBOUND). If 'no', it ends at 'OUTBOUND'. If 'no' from the first decision, it goes to another decision 'next node belongs to own PLMN'. If 'yes', it ends at 'INBOUND'. If 'no', it ends at 'not crossing PLMN boundary'. + +Figure 5.1.2 Macro Check\_Direction (sheet 1 of 1) + + + +macrodefinition Inbound\_own\_to\_own + +1(1) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains +protectable parameter} + D1 -- no --> P1((pass)) + D1 -- yes --> D2{message is +not protected} + + D2 -- yes --> D3{message should be +protected according +to SPD} + D3 -- no --> P2((pass)) + D3 -- yes --> D4{Fall Back allowed +according to SPD} + D4 -- yes --> P2 + D4 -- no --> B1((block)) + + D2 -- no --> D5{calling party address +consistent with SPI} + D5 -- no --> D6{protection mode +acceptable according +to SPD} + D5 -- yes --> D7{success} + + D6 -- no --> D7 + D6 -- yes --> Proc1[De-protect +message] + Proc1 --> D7 + + D7 -- no --> B1 + D7 -- yes --> P3((pass)) + +``` + +The flowchart titled 'macrodefinition Inbound\_own\_to\_own' (sheet 1 of 1) describes the logic for handling inbound messages. It starts with a check: 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', it results in 'pass'. If 'yes', it checks if the 'message is not protected'. + +If the message is not protected ('yes' path), it checks if the 'message should be protected according to SPD'. If 'no', it results in 'pass'. If 'yes', it checks if 'Fall Back allowed according to SPD'. If 'yes', it results in 'pass'; if 'no', it results in 'block'. + +If the message is protected ('no' path from 'message is not protected'), it checks if the 'calling party address consistent with SPI'. If 'yes', it proceeds to a 'success' decision. If 'no', it checks if the 'protection mode acceptable according to SPD'. If 'no' to that, it proceeds to 'success'. If 'yes', it performs 'De-protect message' before checking 'success'. If the 'success' check is 'yes', it results in 'pass'; if 'no', it results in 'block'. + +Flowchart for macrodefinition Inbound\_own\_to\_own + +**Figure 5.1.3 Macro Inbound\_own\_to\_own (sheet 1 of 1)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message is not protected" takes the "no"-exit if user-information within the Dialogue Portion is identified by the object identifier ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or + +operationCode within an Invoke or ReturnResult Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or errorCode within an ReturnError Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS. + +The decision box "message should be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if the message's SCCP calling party address identifies a PLMN for which an SPD entry for incoming messages exists. + +The decision box "fall back allowed according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPD entry for incoming messages is marked "fall back allowed". + +The decision box "calling party address consistent with SPI" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPI within the message's Security Header points to an SA that was negotiated with the PLMN derived from the message's SCCP calling party address. + +The decision box "protection mode acceptable according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if the protection mode within the message's Security Header is found in the SPD-entry for incoming messages. + + + +macrodefinition Inbound\_own\_to\_foreign + +1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> P1((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message is not protected}; D2 -- no --> D3{called party address consistent with SPI}; D2 -- yes --> D4{message should be protected according to SPD}; D4 -- no --> P2((pass)); D4 -- yes --> D5{Fall Back allowed according to SPD}; D5 -- yes --> P3((pass)); D5 -- no --> B1((block)); D3 -- yes --> P4((pass)); D3 -- no --> D6{protection mode correct}; D6 -- yes --> P5((pass)); D6 -- no --> B2((block)); +``` + +Flowchart for macrodefinition Inbound\_own\_to\_foreign. The process starts with an oval connector. The first decision is 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to the next decision 'message is not protected'. If 'no', it goes to a third decision 'called party address consistent with SPI'. If 'yes', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'no', it goes to a fourth decision 'protection mode correct'. If 'yes', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'no', it goes to a 'block' connector. The third decision 'message should be protected according to SPD' has a 'no' exit to the 'pass' connector and a 'yes' exit to the fourth decision 'Fall Back allowed according to SPD'. The fourth decision 'Fall Back allowed according to SPD' has a 'yes' exit to a 'pass' connector and a 'no' exit to the 'block' connector. + +**Figure 5.1.4 Macro Inbound\_own\_to\_foreign (sheet 1 of 1)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message is not protected" takes the "no"-exit if user-information within the Dialogue Portion is identified by the object identifier ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or + +operationCode within an Invoke or ReturnResult Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or errorCode within an ReturnError Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS. + +The decision box "message should be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if the message's SCCP called party address identifies a PLMN for which an SPD entry for outgoing messages exists. + +The decision box "fall back allowed according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPD entry for outgoing messages is marked "fall back allowed". + +The decision box "called party address consistent with SPI" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPI within the message's Security Header points to an SA that was negotiated with the PLMN derived from the message's SCCP called party address. + +The decision box "protection mode correct" takes the "yes"-exit if the presence/absence of octets 10 and 11 within the message's Security Header is consistent with the protection mode in the SPD-entry for outgoing messages. Note that octets 10 and 11 of the Security Header are only used to construct the IV which is not needed (and shall therefore be absent) if the protection mode is "authenticity and integrity". + + + +macrodefinition Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own + +1(2) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> Pass1((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message is not protected}; D2 -- no --> A((A)); D2 -- yes --> D3{relayed by SRF}; D3 -- no --> D4{message should be protected according to SPD (orig. network)}; D3 -- yes --> D5{message should be protected according to SPD (relay network)}; D5 -- no --> Pass2((pass)); D5 -- yes --> D6{Fall Back allowed according to SPD (relay network)}; D6 -- no --> Block((block)); D6 -- yes --> Pass3((pass)); D4 -- no --> Pass2; D4 -- yes --> D7{Fall Back allowed according to SPD (orig. network)}; D7 -- no --> Block; D7 -- yes --> Pass3; +``` + +The flowchart titled 'macrodefinition Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own' (sheet 1 of 2) outlines the decision logic for processing inbound messages from foreign networks. It begins with a start connector leading to a decision: 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', the message is 'pass'. If 'yes', it proceeds to 'message is not protected'. If 'no', it goes to connector 'A'. If 'yes', it checks 'relayed by SRF'. If 'no', it proceeds to 'message should be protected according to SPD (orig. network)'. If 'yes', it checks 'message should be protected according to SPD (relay network)'. If 'no', it is 'pass'. If 'yes', it checks 'Fall Back allowed according to SPD (relay network)'. If 'no', it is 'block'. If 'yes', it is 'pass'. From 'message should be protected according to SPD (orig. network)', if 'no', it is 'pass'. If 'yes', it checks 'Fall Back allowed according to SPD (orig. network)'. If 'no', it is 'block'. If 'yes', it is 'pass'. + +Flowchart for macrodefinition Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own + +Figure 5.1.5 Macro Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own (sheet 1 of 2) + + + +macrodefinition Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own 2(2) + +``` +graph TD; A((A)) --> D1{calling party address consistent with SPI}; D1 -- yes --> DM[De-protect message]; D1 -- no --> D2{relayed by SRF}; D2 -- no --> B1((block)); D2 -- yes --> D3{protection mode acceptable according to SPD (relay network)}; D3 -- no --> B1; D3 -- yes --> DM; D3 -- no --> D4{protection mode acceptable according to SPD (orig. network)}; D4 -- yes --> DM; D4 -- no --> B2((block)); DM --> D5{success}; D5 -- yes --> P((pass)); D5 -- no --> B3((block)); +``` + +Flowchart for macrodefinition Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own (sheet 2 of 2). The process starts at node A. It enters a loop of decision boxes: 'calling party address consistent with SPI' (yes leads to 'De-protect message', no leads to 'relayed by SRF'), 'relayed by SRF' (yes leads to 'protection mode acceptable according to SPD (relay network)', no leads to 'block'), and 'protection mode acceptable according to SPD (relay network)' (yes leads to 'De-protect message', no leads to 'protection mode acceptable according to SPD (orig. network)'). The final decision 'protection mode acceptable according to SPD (orig. network)' (yes leads to 'De-protect message', no leads to 'block'). 'De-protect message' leads to 'success' (yes leads to 'pass', no leads to 'block'). + +**Figure 5.1.5 Macro Inbound\_foreign\_to\_own (sheet 2 of 2)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message is not protected" takes the "no"-exit if user-information within the Dialogue Portion is identified by the object identifier ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or + +operationCode within an Invoke or ReturnResult Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or errorCode within an ReturnError Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS. + +The decision box "relayed by SRF" takes the "yes"-exit if the SCCP called party address consists of a Routing Number (RN) pointing to the own network and an MSISDN pointing to a relay network within the portability cluster. + +The decision box "message should be protected according to SPD (relay network)" takes the "yes"-exit if an SPD entry for incoming messages exists for the relay network. + +The decision box "Fall Back allowed according to SPD (relay network)" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPD entry for incoming messages (from the relay network) is marked "fall back allowed". + +The decision box "message should be protected according to SPD (orig. network)" takes the "yes"-exit if the message's SCCP calling party address identifies a PLMN for which an SPD entry for incoming messages exists. + +The decision box "Fall Back allowed according to SPD (relay network)" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPD entry for incoming messages (from the network identified by the SCCP calling party address) is marked "fall back allowed". + +The decision box "calling party address consistent with SPI" takes the "yes"-exit if the SPI within the message's Security Header points to an SA that was negotiated with the PLMN derived from the message's SCCP calling party address. + +The decision box "protection mode acceptable according to SPD (relay network)" takes the "yes"-exit if the presence/absence of octets 10 and 11 within the message's Security Header is consistent with a protection mode found in the SPD-entry (for incoming messages from the network identified by the SPI). Note that octets 10 and 11 of the Security Header are only used to construct the IV which is not needed (and shall therefore be absent) if the protection mode is "authenticity and integrity". + +The decision box "protection mode acceptable according to SPD (orig. network)" takes the "yes"-exit if the presence/absence of octets 10 and 11 within the message's Security Header is consistent with a protection mode found in the SPD-entry (for incoming messages from the network identified by the SCCP calling party address). Note that octets 10 and 11 of the Security Header are only used to construct the IV which is not needed (and shall therefore be absent) if the protection mode is "authenticity and integrity". + + + +macrodefinition Outbound\_own\_to\_own + +1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> Pass((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message needs to be protected according to SPD}; D2 -- no --> Pass; D2 -- yes --> P[protect message]; P --> Pass; +``` + +Flowchart for macrodefinition Outbound\_own\_to\_own. It starts with a connector symbol, followed by a decision box 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to another decision box 'message needs to be protected according to SPD'. If 'no', it goes to the 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to a 'protect message' box, which then leads to the 'pass' connector. + +**Figure 5.1.6 Macro Outbound\_own\_to\_own (sheet 1 of 1)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message needs to be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if an SPD entry for outgoing messages exists (for messages sent to the own network). + + + +macrodefinition Outbound\_own\_to\_foreign 1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> Pass((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message is protected}; D2 -- yes --> Pass; D2 -- no --> D3{message needs to be protected according to SPD}; D3 -- no --> Pass; D3 -- yes --> P[protect message]; P --> Pass; +``` + +The flowchart illustrates the logic for the macro Outbound\_own\_to\_foreign. It begins with a start symbol (a circle with a vertical line) leading to a decision diamond labeled "message contains protectable parameter". If the answer is "no", the flow proceeds directly to a pass symbol (a circle with a vertical line). If the answer is "yes", it proceeds to the next decision diamond labeled "message is protected". If this second decision is "yes", the flow proceeds to the pass symbol. If the answer is "no", it proceeds to a third decision diamond labeled "message needs to be protected according to SPD". If the answer is "no", the flow proceeds to the pass symbol. If the answer is "yes", it proceeds to a process box labeled "protect message", which then leads to the pass symbol. + +Flowchart for macro Outbound\_own\_to\_foreign + +**Figure 5.1.7 Macro Outbound\_own\_to\_foreign (sheet 1 of 1)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message is protected" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information within the Dialogue Portion is identified by the object identifier ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or + +operationCode within an Invoke or ReturnResult Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or errorCode within an ReturnError Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS. + +The decision box "message needs to be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if an SPD entry for outgoing messages exists (for messages sent to the network identified by the SCCP called party address). + + + +macrodefinition Outbound\_foreign\_to\_own 1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> Pass((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message needs to be protected according to SPD}; D2 -- no --> Pass; D2 -- yes --> P[protect message with reverse SA]; P --> Pass; +``` + +Flowchart for Outbound\_foreign\_to\_own macro. It starts with an oval connector, followed by a decision diamond 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to another decision diamond 'message needs to be protected according to SPD'. If 'no', it goes to the 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to a process box 'protect message with reverse SA', which then leads to the 'pass' connector. + +**Figure 5.1.8 Macro Outbound\_foreign\_to\_own (sheet 1 of 1)** + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or + +a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message needs to be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if an SPD entry for incoming messages exists (for messages received from the network identified by the SCCP calling party address). If more than one acceptable protection modes are present, one may be chosen. + +The task box "protect message with reverse SA" performs protection of the message with the SA that is to be used for de-protection when receiving messages from the network in question. + + + +macrodefinition Outbound\_foreign\_to\_foreign 1(1) + +``` +graph TD; Start([ ]) --> D1{message contains protectable parameter}; D1 -- no --> Pass((pass)); D1 -- yes --> D2{message is protected}; D2 -- yes --> Pass; D2 -- no --> D3{relayed by SRF}; D3 -- no --> Pass; D3 -- yes --> D4{message needs to be protected according to SPD}; D4 -- no --> Pass; D4 -- yes --> T1[protect message]; T1 --- T2[with SA own to foreign]; T1 --> Pass; +``` + +Flowchart for macro Outbound\_foreign\_to\_foreign. It starts with an oval connector, followed by a decision 'message contains protectable parameter'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to a decision 'message is protected'. If 'yes', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'no', it goes to a decision 'relayed by SRF'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to a decision 'message needs to be protected according to SPD'. If 'no', it goes to a 'pass' connector. If 'yes', it goes to a task 'protect message' which is associated with 'with SA own to foreign', and then to a 'pass' connector. + +Figure 5.1.9 Macro Outbound\_foreign\_to\_foreign (sheet 1 of 1) + +The decision box "message contains protectable parameter" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information is present in the Dialogue Portion, or a parameter is present in an Invoke or ReturnError Component, or a result is present in a ReturnResult Component. + +The decision box "message is protected" takes the "yes"-exit if user-information within the Dialogue Portion is identified by the object identifier ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or operationCode within an Invoke or ReturnResult Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS or errorCode within an ReturnError Component takes the global value ss7-ProtectedDialogueAS. + +The decision box "relayed by SRF" takes the "yes"-exit if the SCCP called party address consists of a Routing Number (RN) pointing to the own network and an MSISDN pointing to a relay network within the portability cluster. + +The decision box "message needs to be protected according to SPD" takes the "yes"-exit if an SPD entry for outgoing messages exists (for messages sent to the network identified by the SCCP called party address). + +### 5.1.2 Interactions with Mobile Number Portability + +In Mobile Number Portability scenarios (see 3GPP TS 23.066 [4]) a Signalling Relay Function (SRF) may relay SCCP traffic by modifying the SCCP called party address as shown in figure 4.1.10. + +A relayed message's SCCP called party address consists of a Routing Number (RN) and an MSISDN (see 3GPP TS 23.066 [4]). + +An SS7 Security Gateway needs to recognize (by analyzing the SCCP called party address) whether or not a message was relayed in order to + +- distinguish outbound transit traffic relayed by an SRF in the own network (which needs to be protected) from other outbound transit traffic (which needs to be passed transparently), and to +- distinguish inbound terminating traffic relayed by an SRF within the portability cluster (where the check needs to be based on the policy identified by the MSISDN within the SCCP called party address) from other inbound terminating traffic (where the check needs to be based on the policy identified by the SCCP calling party address). + +**NOTE :** In MNP-SRF scenarios, when the relaying PLMN does not make use of TCAP-User Security, messages sent from a source PLMN to a destination PLMN via the relaying PLMN are unprotected although protection may be desired for messages sent from the source PLMN to the destination PLMN. Network operators may therefore want to negotiate use of TCAP-User Security with all PLMNs of a portability cluster. + +### 5.1.3 Interactions with SCCP segmentation + +When the incoming SCCP message makes use of SCCP segmenting (i.e. several XUDT messages are received rather than one UDT or a single XUDT message) the SS7 Security Gateway has to perform reassembling before processing the message, and it may have to perform segmenting before sending the processed message. + +It may happen that the received SCCP message (containing an unprotected TCAP user payload) is not segmented (UDT or single XUDT), but after security processing the message's length is increased, so that the processed message needs to be segmented before it is sent. This situation may be undesired (since transfer of XUDT messages is not guaranteed by all transit networks) but cannot be avoided by the SS7 Security Gateway (see note). + +**Note:** The support of message segmentation at the SCCP layer in all transit networks could be enforced by mandating the usage of the White Book SCCP [9]. GSMA would work with International Carriers to ensure that fully operationally-verified support of XUDT is available before TCAPsec gateways are deployed. + +It may also happen that the received (protected) message is segmented (several XUDTs), but after security processing the message's length is decreased, so that the processed message does not need to be segmented before it is sent. In this case the de-protecting SS7 Security Gateway needs to know some SCCP-details of the original unprotected message as sent from the originating NE to the protecting SS7 Security Gateway. These original SCCP information needs to be transported within the TCAP-user parameter of the protected message. Depending on this information the de-protecting SS7-Security Gateway can decide whether to send a UDT or a single XUDT message towards the destination. . + +In cases where the received unprotected message is not segmented but the (to be) sent protected message needs to be segmented, the SS7 Security Gateway has to replace the message's SCCP calling party address with its own address. This is to guarantee uniqueness of the combination of the SCCP calling party address and the Segmentation local reference in the (to be) sent message. The original SCCP calling party address needs to be transported within the TCAP-user parameter of the (first segment of the) protected message. + +If the received protected message contains an original SCCP calling party address within the TCAP-user parameter, the de-protecting SS7 Security Gateway has to replace the SCCP calling party address with the original SCCP calling party address before forwarding the de-protected message to the destination. + +An SS7 Security Gateway that has sent a segmented, protected message with a replaced SCCP calling party address may receive an SCCP XUDTS message with its own address as called party address. In this case the SS7 Security Gateway shall retrieve the original SCCP calling party address, the original TCAP Message type and TCAP transaction id from the data parameter of the received XUDTS message and construct a UDT message with unmodified Return cause, called party address replaced with the retrieved original calling party address, unmodified calling party address, and Data parameter containing the retrieved TCAP message type and TCAP transaction id, and forward it to the destination. + +### 5.1.4 Protocol details + +#### 5.1.4.1 Transformation of unprotected message to protected message + +The unprotected TCAP-user message is either transported within an SCCP UDT message or it is transported within a single SCCP XUDT message or it is segmented over several SCCP XUDT messages. Other SCCP message types are not subject to protection. + +The transformation process is done in 3 steps: + +##### Step 1: SCCP re-assembly of the unprotected message + +In a first step the unprotected message is transformed into an intermediate unprotected representation which is made up of the following parameters: + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| SCCP Message type | | +| SCCP Protocol class | | +| SCCP Hop counter (optional) | | +| SCCP Called party address | | +| SCCP Calling party address | | +| SCCP Segmentation local reference (optional) | | +| SCCP Importance (optional) | | +| SCCP Data (made up of the following parameters: | TCAP Message type | +| | TCAP orig. Transaction Id (optional) | +| | TCAP dest. Transaction Id (optional) | +| | TCAP Dialogue Portion (optional) | +| | TCAP Component Portion (optional)) | + +If the unprotected message was transported within an SCCP UDT message, the intermediate unprotected representation of the message takes the following values: + +| | | +|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------| +| SCCP Message type | UDT | +| SCCP Protocol class | same as in the received UDT message | +| SCCP Hop counter | absent | +| SCCP Called party address | same as in the received UDT message | +| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the received UDT message | +| SCCP Segmentation local reference | absent | +| SCCP Importance | absent | +| SCCP Data | same as in the received UDT message | + +If the unprotected message was transported within a single SCCP XUDT message, the intermediate unprotected representation of the message takes the following values: + +| | | +|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| SCCP Message type | XUDT | +| SCCP Protocol class | same as in the received XUDT message | +| SCCP Hop counter | same as in the received XUDT message | +| SCCP Called party address | same as in the received XUDT message | +| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the received XUDT message | +| SCCP Segmentation local reference | absent | +| SCCP Importance | same as in the received XUDT message | +| SCCP Data | same as in the received XUDT message | + +If the unprotected message was segmented over several SCCP XUDT messages, the intermediate unprotected representation of the message takes the following values: + +| | | +|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCCP Message type | XUDT | +| SCCP Protocol class | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Hop counter | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Called party address | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Segmentation local reference | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Importance | same as in the first received XUDT message | +| SCCP Data | concatenation of the received segments (for details of the re-assembly procedure see ITU-T Q.714 [9]) | + +##### Step 2: Protection + +In a second step the intermediate unprotected representation is transformed into an intermediate protected representation which is made up of the following parameters: + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCCP Hop counter (optional) | | +| SCCP Called party address | | +| SCCP Calling party address | | +| SCCP Segmentation local reference (optional) | | +| SCCP Importance (optional) | | +| Original SCCP info (made up of the following parameters: | Original SCCP Calling party address (optional)secureTransport OPERATION ::= { ARGUMENT SecureTransportArg CODE local:90 } |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+| |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| SecureTransportArg ::= SEQUENCE { originalSCCP-Info [0] OriginalSCCP-Info OPTIONAL, originalTCAP-Info [1] OriginalTCAP-Info, protectedPayload [2] ProtectedPayload } |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+| |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| OriginalSCCP-Info ::= SEQUENCE { originalSCCP-MessageType [0] OriginalSCCP-MessageType OPTIONAL, -- original SCCP-MessageType shall be present if it is different from the actual -- SCCP-Message type; otherwise it may be absent originalSCCP-ProtocolClass [1] OriginalSCCP-ProtocolClass OPTIONAL -- originalSCCP-ProtocolClass shall be present if it is different from the actual -- SCCP-Protocol class (first segment); otherwise it may be absent. originalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress [2] OriginalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress OPTIONAL, -- originalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress shall be present if and only if the actual -- SCCP Calling party address is the SS7 Security Gateway's own address } |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+
+```
+
+OriginalSCCP-MessageType ::= ENUMERATED {
+ udt (9),
+ xudt (17) }
+ -- this parameter shall take the value of the Original SCCP Message type from the
+ -- intermediate protected representation
+}
+
+OriginalSCCP-ProtocolClass ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(1))
+ -- coded according to ITU-T Q.713
+}
+
+OriginalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(3..18))
+ -- coded according to ITU-T Q.713
+ -- Octet 1: Address indicator
+ -- Octets 2 - n: Address
+}
+
+OriginalTCAP-Info ::= SEQUENCE {
+ originalTCAP-MessageType OriginalTCAP-MessageType,
+ otid OTID OPTIONAL,
+ dtid DTID OPTIONAL
+}
+
+OriginalTCAP-MessageType ::= ENUMERATED {
+ unidirectional (97),
+ begin (98),
+ end (100),
+ continue (101),
+ abort (103) }
+ -- this parameter shall take the value of the Original TCAP Message type from the
+ -- intermediate protected representation
+}
+
+OTID ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..4))
+ -- OTID shall take the value of the TCAP otid from the intermediate protected
+ -- representation
+}
+
+DTID ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..4))
+ -- DTID shall take the value of the TCAP dtid from the intermediate protected
+ -- representation
+}
+
+ProtectedPayload ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(13..3438))
+ -- The protected payload is the concatenation of
+ -- 9 or 11 octets SecurityHeader,
+ -- n octets ciphertext or cleartext, and
+ -- 4 octets MAC
+
+ -- The SecurityHeader is coded as follows (see 3GPP TS 33.204 [8]):
+ -- Octets 1-4: SPI
+ -- Octets 5-8: TVP. The TVP is a 32 bit time stamp. Its value is binary coded
+ --
+ -- and indicates the number of intervals of 100 milliseconds
+ -- elapsed since 1st January 2002, 0:00:00 UTC
+ -- Octet 9: Indicator Byte with bits 7-1 spare and bit 0 if set indicates presence of
+ -- Octets 10-11
+ -- Octet 10: SS7 SEG-Id
+ -- Octet 11: Prop
+}
+
+```
+
+END
+
+#### 5.1.4.2 Transformation of protected message to unprotected message
+
+The protected TCAP-user message is either transported within an SCCP UDT message or it is transported within a single SCCP XUDT message or it is segmented over several SCCP XUDT messages. Other SCCP message types are not subject to protection.
+
+The transformation process is done in 3 steps:
+
+##### Step 1: SCCP re-assembly of the protected message
+
+In a first step the protected message is transformed into the intermediate protected representation (see chapter 5.1.4.1):
+
+If the protected message was transported within an SCCP UDT message, the intermediate protected representation of the message takes the following values:
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| SCCP Hop counter | absent |
+| SCCP Called party address | same as in the received UDT message |
+| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the received UDT message |
+| SCCP Segmentation local reference | absent |
+| SCCP Importance | absent |
+| Original SCCP info | |
+| Original SCCP Calling party address | absent |
+| Original SCCP Message type | UDT |
+| Original SCCP Protocol class | same as SCCP Protocol class in the received UDT message |
+| Original TCAP info | |
+| Original TCAP Message type | same as Original TCAP Message type in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| otid | same as otid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| dtid | same as dtid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec Security header | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec Cipher- or Cleartext | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec MAC | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+
+If the protected message was transported within a single SCCP XUDT message, the intermediate protected representation of the message takes the following values:
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| SCCP Hop counter | same as in the received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Called party address | same as in the received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Segmentation local reference | absent |
+| SCCP Importance | same as in the received XUDT message |
+| Original SCCP info | |
+| Original SCCP Calling party address | absent |
+| Original SCCP Message type | same as OriginalSCCP-Messagetype in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| Original SCCP Protocol class | same as OriginalSCCP-ProtocolClass in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| Original TCAP info | |
+| Original TCAP Message type | same as Original TCAP Message type in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| otid | same as otid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| dtid | same as dtid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec Security header | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec Cipher- or Cleartext | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+| TCAPsec MAC | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received message |
+
+If the protected message was transported within several SCCP XUDT message, the intermediate protected representation of the message takes the following values:
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
+| SCCP Hop counter | same as in the first received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Called party address | same as in the first received XUDT message |
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| SCCP Calling party address | same as in the first received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Segmentation local reference | same as in the first received XUDT message |
+| SCCP Importance | same as in the first received XUDT message |
+| Original SCCP info | |
+| Original SCCP Calling party address | same as OriginalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| Original SCCP Message type | same as OriginalSCCP-MessageType in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| Original SCCP Protocol class | same as OriginalSCCP-ProtocolClass in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| Original TCAP info | |
+| Original TCAP Message type | same as OriginalTCAP-MessageType in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| otid | same as otid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| dtid | same as dtid in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| TCAPsec Security header | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| TCAPsec Cipher- or Cleartext | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+| TCAPsec MAC | same as received in the TCAP-invoke component parameter of the received reassembled message |
+
+##### Step 2: De-Protection
+
+In a second step the intermediate protected representation is transformed into an intermediate unprotected representation (see chapter 5.1.4.1):
+
+The intermediate unprotected representation of the message takes the following values:
+
+| | |
+|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| SCCP Message type | same as OriginalSCCP-MessageType from the TCAP-invoke component's parameter of the intermediate protected representation |
+| SCCP Protocol class | same as OriginalSCCP-ProtocolClass from the TCAP-invoke component's parameter of the intermediate protected representation |
+| SCCP Hop counter | same as SCCP Hop counter in the intermediate protected representation |
+| SCCP Called party address | same as SCCP Called party address in the intermediate protected representation |
+| SCCP Calling party address | if OriginalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress is present in the intermediate protected representation, its value is taken; otherwise same as SCCP Calling party address of the intermediate protected representation |
+| SCCP Segmentation local reference | if SCCP Message type in the intermediate unprotected representation is XUDT, then same as in the intermediate protected representation; otherwise absent. |
+| SCCP Importance | same as in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| SCCP Data : | |
+| TCAP Message type | same as OriginalTCAP-MessageType in the intermediate protected representation |
+| TCAP orig. Transaction Id | same as otid in the intermediate protected representation |
+| TCAP dest. Transaction Id | same as dtid in the intermediate protected representation |
+| TCAP Dialogue Portion (optional) | First part of the cleartext (as indicated by TAG and LENGTH according to BER). If encryption was applied then ciphertext needs to be converted first to cleartext |
+| TCAP Component Portion (optional) | second part of the cleartext (as indicated by TAG and LENGTH according to BER). If encryption was applied then ciphertext needs to be converted first to cleartext |
+
+##### Step 3: SCCP segmentation of the unprotected message
+
+In a third step the intermediate unprotected representation is transformed into a single SCCP UDT message, a single SCCP XUDT message, or several SCCP XUDT messages depending on the SCCP Message type of the intermediate unprotected representation and the need for segmentation as follows:
+
+If the SCCP Message type in the intermediate unprotected representation is "UDT", it is transformed into a single SCCP UDT message with following parameter values:
+
+| | |
+|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Message Type | UDT |
+| Protocol class | same as SCCP Protocol class in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Called party address | same as SCCP Called party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Calling party address | same as SCCP Calling party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Data | same as SCCP Data in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+
+If the SCCP Message type in the intermediate unprotected representation is "XUDT" and the message does not need to be segmented, it is transformed into a single SCCP XUDT message with following parameter values:
+
+| | |
+|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Message type | XUDT |
+| Protocol class | same as SCCP Protocol class in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Hop counter | same as SCCP Hop counter in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Called party address | same as SCCP Called party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Calling party address | same as SCCP Calling party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Data | same as SCCP Data in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Segmentation | absent |
+| Importance | same as SCCP Importance in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+
+If the SCCP Message type in the intermediate unprotected representation is "XUDT" and the message needs to be segmented, it is transformed into several SCCP XUDT message with following parameter values:
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Message type (all segments) | XUDT |
+| Protocol class (first segment) | class 1 (in sequence delivery), return option: same as in SCCP Protocol class of the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| (subsequent segments) | class 1 (in sequence delivery), return option: no special options |
+| Hop counter (all segments) | same as SCCP Hop counter in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Called party address (all segments) | same as SCCP Called party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Calling party address (all segments) | same as SCCP Calling party address in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Data | segment of SCCP Data from the intermediate unprotected representation (see ITU-T Q.714 [9]) |
+| Segmentation | see [9]. Local reference shall be taken from the intermediate unprotected representation |
+| Importance (all segments) | same as SCCP Importance in the intermediate unprotected representation |
+
+#### 5.1.4.3 Handling of received XUDTS messages and UDTS messages
+
+An SS7 Security Gateway shall not try to re-assemble XUDTS messages, since the SCCP option "return on error" is not set for subsequent XUDT segments. As a consequence the SS7 Security Gateway shall not try to protect or de-protect XUDTS messages (fragments) or UDTS messages. However, special handling of XUDTS messages and UDTS messages is required as follows:
+
+##### Outbound direction
+
+Instead of re-assembling and protecting the XUDTS messages or protecting UDTS messages, the SS7 Security Gateway shall remove the TCAP Dialogue Portion and the TCAP Component Portion from the SCCP Data parameter before sending the XUDTS message or UDTS message. This is in order not to pass the cleartext (or fragment of the cleartext) in outbound direction. SCCP message type and addresses shall not be changed.
+
+An example is shown in figure 5.1.4.3-1: A transit node in PLMN 2 cannot deliver the UDT message and therefore returns an UDTS message. SS7 Security Gateway 2 in PLMN 2 removes the cleartext (TCAP dialogue portion and TCAP component portion) from the SCCP data parameter. SS7 Security Gateway 1 in PLMN 1 recognizes that the
+
+received UDT message does not contain a TCAP unidirectional message with a secure transport invoke component and therefore it does not modify the SCCP message.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant NE1 as NE 1
+ participant SGW1 as SS7 Sec Gateway 1
+ participant SGW2 as SS7 Sec Gateway 2
+ participant TN as Transit Node
+ participant NE2 as NE 2
+
+ Note left of NE1: PLMN 1
+ Note right of NE2: PLMN 2
+
+ NE1->>SGW1: UDT
+ SGW1->>SGW2: XUDT
+ SGW1->>SGW2: XUDT
+ SGW2->>TN: UDT
+ TN->>SGW2: UDT
+ SGW2->>SGW1: UDT
+ SGW1->>NE1: UDT
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram showing message exchanges between NE 1, SS7 Sec Gateway 1, SS7 Sec Gateway 2, Transit Node, and NE 2 across PLMN 1 and PLMN 2.
+
+**Figure 5.1.4.3-1: XUDTS messages and UDTS messages (Outbound direction)**
+
+##### Inbound direction
+
+Instead of re-assembling and de-protecting the XUDTS messages or de-protecting UDTS messages, the SS7 Security Gateway shall analyze the SCCP Called party address. If it matches with the SS7 Security Gateway's own address, it shall recover the OriginalSCCP-CallingPartyAddress from the (fragment in the) data parameter and replace the SCCP Called party address with the recovered value. In any case the SS7 Security Gateway shall recover and analyze the TCAP Message type from the (fragment in the) data parameter. If the recovered value is "unidirectional" and a invoke component with operation code "secure transport" is included, the SS7 Security Gateway shall recover the originalTCAP-MessageType, otid, and dtid from the OriginalTCAP-Info, replace the TCAP Message type with the original TCAP-MessageType, insert otid and dtid and remove the remaining material from the SCCP data parameter. If the received message is an XUDTS message and the original SCCP Message type was UDT then the SS7 Security shall modify the SCCP Message type to UDTS.
+
+An example is shown in figure 5.1.4.3-2: A transit node in a transit network cannot deliver the XUDT messages and therefore returns an XUDTS message (note that the second XUDT does not have the SCCP return option set). SS7 Security Gateway 1 in PLMN 1 recognizes that the received XUDTS message does contain a TCAP unidirectional message with a secure transport invoke component and therefore, since the original SCCP-MessageType is UDT, modifies the SCCP Message type from XUDTS to UDTS. Furthermore, the TCAP Message type is modified from unidirectional to the original TCAP-MessageType, the Transaction Ids are inserted, and the remaining material (fragment of the ciphertext) is removed.
+
+In addition the SS7 Security Gateway 1 in PLMN 1 recognizes that the received XUDTS message does contain SS7 Security Gateway 1's own address as SCCP Called party address and therefore replaces it with the original SCCPCalling party address.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a sequence of messages between network elements (NEs) and gateways across two PLMNs. PLMN 1 contains NE 1, SS7 Sec Gateway 1, and a Transit Node. PLMN 2 contains SS7 Sec Gateway 2 and NE 2. The message flow is as follows:
+
+- NE 1 sends a UDT message to SS7 Sec Gateway 1.
+- SS7 Sec Gateway 1 sends two XUDT messages to the Transit Node.
+- The Transit Node sends an XUDTS message back to SS7 Sec Gateway 1.
+- SS7 Sec Gateway 1 sends a UDTS message back to NE 1.
+
+```
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant NE1 as NE 1
+ participant SS7G1 as SS7 Sec Gateway 1
+ participant TN as Transit Node
+ participant SS7G2 as SS7 Sec Gateway 2
+ participant NE2 as NE 2
+
+ Note left of NE1: PLMN 1
+ Note right of NE2: PLMN 2
+
+ NE1->>SS7G1: UDT
+ SS7G1->>TN: XUDT
+ SS7G1->>TN: XUDT
+ TN->>SS7G1: XUDTS
+ SS7G1->>NE1: UDTS
+```
+
+Sequence diagram showing message exchanges between NE 1, SS7 Sec Gateway 1, Transit Node, SS7 Sec Gateway 2, and NE 2 across PLMN 1 and PLMN 2.
+
+Figure 5.1.4.3-2: XUDTS messages and UDTS messages (inbound direction)
+
+# --- Annex A (informative): Change history
+
+| Date | TSG # | TSG Doc. | CR | Rev | Subject/Comment | New |
+|---------|--------|-----------|------|-----|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
+| 2006-06 | CT#32 | CP-060320 | | | Approved as version 7.0.0 | 7.0.0 |
+| 2006-09 | CT#33 | CP-060413 | 0001 | | Addition of abbreviations and correction of a note | 7.1.0 |
+| 2008-12 | CT#42 | | | | Upgraded unchanged from Rel-7 | 8.0.0 |
+| 2009-12 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-9 version (MCC) | 9.0.0 |
+| 2011-03 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-10 version (MCC) | 10.0.0 |
+| 2012-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-11 version (MCC) | 11.0.0 |
+| 2014-09 | - | - | - | - | Update to Rel-12 version (MCC) | 12.0.0 |
+| 2015-12 | CT#70 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) | 13.0.0 |
+| 2017-03 | CT#75 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-14 version (MCC) | 14.0.0 |
+| 2018-06 | CT#80 | - | - | - | Update to Rel-15 version (MCC) | 15.0.0 |
+| 2020-07 | CT#88e | - | - | - | Update to Rel-16 version (MCC) | 16.0.0 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29205/raw.md b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29205/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f26ebd5aa6a11bd4c20b0b95d4913a40fe8c3ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Rel-16/29_series/29205/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,948 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+# Contents
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Foreword ..... | 5 |
+| 1 Scope..... | 6 |
+| 2 References..... | 6 |
+| 3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations ..... | 7 |
+| 3.1 Definitions..... | 7 |
+| 3.2 Symbols..... | 7 |
+| 3.3 Abbreviations ..... | 7 |
+| 4 Protocols..... | 8 |
+| 4.1 Call control protocol (Nc interface) ..... | 8 |
+| 4.2 Interworking with other protocols..... | 8 |
+| 4.3 Resource control protocol (G)MSC and MGW (Mc Interface) ..... | 8 |
+| 4.4 Bearer control protocol between MGWs (Nb interface)..... | 9 |
+| 4.5 Signalling Transport..... | 9 |
+| 4.5.1 Call Control protocols ..... | 9 |
+| 4.5.2 Resource control protocol (G)MSC and MGW (Mc Interface) ..... | 9 |
+| 4.5.3 Bearer control protocol between MGWs (Nb interface) ..... | 9 |
+| Annex A: Void..... | 9 |
+| Annex B (normative): Transparent Support of Mobile Services ..... | 9 |
+| B.1 Introduction..... | 9 |
+| B.2 Mobile Service Transport (MST) – Format and Codes ..... | 10 |
+| B.2.1 Encapsulated Application Information..... | 10 |
+| B.2.1.1 General Layout ..... | 10 |
+| B.2.1.2 List of Identifiers ..... | 12 |
+| B.2.1.3 Mobile Equipment Identifier ..... | 12 |
+| B.2.1.4 LCLS Negotiation Request..... | 13 |
+| B.2.1.5 LCLS Negotiation Response ..... | 13 |
+| B.2.1.6 LCLS Status..... | 14 |
+| B.2.1.7 LCLS Status Change ..... | 14 |
+| B.2.1.8 LCLS Status Result ..... | 14 |
+| B.2.1.9 LCLS Global Call Reference..... | 15 |
+| B.2.1.10 LCLS Configuration Preference..... | 16 |
+| B.2.1.11 LCLS Configuration Change Request..... | 17 |
+| B.2.1.12 LCLS Configuration Change Result ..... | 17 |
+| B.2.2 Application Transport Instruction Indicators ..... | 18 |
+| Annex C (normative): LCLS Service Application ..... | 18 |
+| C.1 Use of MST ASE ..... | 18 |
+| C.2 Procedures..... | 18 |
+| C.2.1 Indication of LCLS Capability ..... | 18 |
+| C.2.1.1 LCLS Service Capability Indication ..... | 18 |
+| C.2.1.2 Actions at Originating Serving Node ..... | 19 |
+| C.2.1.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... | 19 |
+| C.2.1.4 Actions at Destination Serving Node ..... | 19 |
+| C.2.2 Backward LCLS Negotiation during Call Setup..... | 20 |
+| C.2.2.1 Introduction ..... | 20 |
+| C.2.2.2 Actions at Destination Serving Node ..... | 20 |
+| C.2.2.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... | 20 |
+| C.2.2.4 Actions at Originating Serving Node ..... | 20 |
+| C.2.3 Answer message..... | 21 |
+| C.2.3.1 Introduction ..... | 21 |
+| C.2.3.2 Actions at Destination Serving Node ..... | 21 |
+| C.2.3.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... | 21 |
+
+- C.2.3.4 Actions at Originating Serving Node ..... 21
+- C.2.4 LCLS Configuration Change Request..... 21
+- C.2.4.1 Introduction ..... 21
+- C.2.4.2 Actions at Initiating Serving Node ..... 22
+- C.2.4.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... 22
+- C.2.4.4 Actions at Terminating Serving Node ..... 22
+- C.2.5 LCLS Status Update..... 22
+- C.2.5.1 Introduction ..... 22
+- C.2.5.2 Actions at Initiating Serving Node ..... 23
+- C.2.5.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... 23
+- C.2.5.4 Actions at Terminating Serving Node ..... 23
+- C.2.6 LCLS Status Change Request..... 23
+- C.2.6.1 Introduction ..... 23
+- C.2.6.2 Actions at Initiating Serving Node ..... 23
+- C.2.6.3 Actions at Intermediate Serving Node..... 24
+- C.2.6.4 Actions at Terminating Serving Node ..... 24
+
+Annex D (informative): Change history..... 25
+
+# --- Foreword
+
+This Technical Specification has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
+
+The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
+
+Version x.y.z
+
+where:
+
+- x the first digit:
+ - 1 presented to TSG for information;
+ - 2 presented to TSG for approval;
+ - 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
+- y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc.
+- z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
+
+# --- 1 Scope
+
+The present document describes the protocols to be used when ITU-T Q.1902 "Bearer Independent Call Control" is used as call control protocol in a 3GPP Bearer Independent CS core network 3GPP TS 23.205 [1]. The Q.1902 operates between (G)MSC servers. The BICC architecture as described in ITU-T Q.1902 [6]-[10] consists of a number of protocols. The following types of protocols are described: call control protocol, bearer control protocols and a resource control protocol for this architecture. The architecture complies with the requirements imposed by 3GPP TS 23.205 [1] and TS 23.153 [2].
+
+The present document is valid for a 3rd generation PLMN (UMTS) complying with Release 4 and later.
+
+Note: Q.1902 can be used in other network architectures than the one defined in 3GPP TS 23.205 [1]
+
+# --- 2 References
+
+The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
+
+- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
+- For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
+- For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document *in the same Release as the present document*.
+
+- [1] 3GPP TS 23.205: "Bearer Independent CS Core Network – Stage 2".
+- [2] 3GPP TS 23.153: "Out of Band Transcoder Control - Stage 2".
+- [3] 3GPP TS 29.232: "Media Gateway Controller (MGC) – Media Gateway (MGW) Interface; Stage 3".
+- [4] 3GPP TS 29.414: "Core Network Nb Data Transport and Signalling Transport".
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.765.5 (06/2000): "Application Transport Mechanism".
+- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1902.1 (07/2001): "Bearer Independent Call Control CS2 Functional Description". Inclusive Amendment 3: "Support for the Customized Alerting Tone (CAT) service".
+- [7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1902.2 (07/2001): "Bearer Independent Call Control CS2 General functions of messages and parameters". Inclusive Amendment 5: "Support for the Customized Alerting Tone (CAT) service".
+- [8] ITU-T Q.1902.3 (07/2001): "Bearer Independent Call Control CS2 Formats and Codes". Inclusive Amendment 5: "Support for the Customized Alerting Tone (CAT) service".
+- [9] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1902.4 (07/2001): "Bearer Independent Call Control CS2 Basic Call Procedures".
+- [10] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1902.5 (07/2001): "Exceptions to the Application Transport Mechanism in the Context of Bearer Independent Call Control".
+- [11] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1902.6 (07/2001): "Generic Signalling Procedures for the support of the ISDN User Part Supplementary Services and for bearer redirection".
+- [12] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1950 (07/2001): "Call Bearer Control Protocol".
+- [13] ITU-T Recommendations Q.2630.1 (12/1999), Q.2630.2 (12/2000): "AAL type 2 signalling protocol".
+- [14] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1990 (07/2001): "BICC Bearer Control tunnelling protocol".
+
+- [15] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1970 (07/2001): "BICC IP Bearer Control protocol".
+- [16] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1912.1 (07/2001): "Interworking between Signalling System No. 7 ISDN user part and the Bearer Independent Call Control protocol".
+- [17] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1912.2 (07/2001): "Interworking between selected Signalling System (PSTN Access DSS1, C5, R1, R2, TUP) and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol".
+- [18] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.0 (05/2001): "Generic Signalling Transport Service".
+- [19] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.1 (05/2001): "Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b".
+- [20] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.3 (12/2002): "Signalling Transport Converter on SCTP".
+- [21] ITU-T Recommendation H.248.4 (11/2000): "Gateway Control Protocol: Transport over SCTP".
+- [22] 3GPP TS 29.202: "SS7 signalling transport in core network".
+- [23] ITU-T Recommendation H.248.5 (11/2000): "Gateway control protocol: Transport over ATM".
+- [24] ITU-T Q.765 (06/2000): "Signalling system No. 7 – Application transport mechanism".
+- [25] 3GPP TS 23.003: "Numbering, addressing and identification".
+- [26] 3GPP TS 23.216: "Single Radio Voice Call Continuity (SRVCC); Stage 2".
+- [27] 3GPP TS 23.237: "IP Multimedia subsystem (IMS) Service Continuity; Stage 2".
+- [28] 3GPP TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
+- [29] 3GPP TS 23.284: "Local Call Local Switch; Stage 2".
+
+# --- 3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions
+
+## 3.2 Symbols
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the following symbols apply:
+
+| | |
+|----|-----------------------------------------------------|
+| Nc | Interface between the (G)MSC servers. |
+| Mc | Interface between the server and the media gateway. |
+| Nb | Interface between media gateways (MGW). |
+
+## 3.3 Abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations as defined in 3GPP TR 21.905 [28] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in 3GPP TR 21.905 [28].
+
+| | |
+|------|----------------------------------|
+| APM | Application Transport Mechanism |
+| | Application Transport Message |
+| APP | Application Transport Parameter |
+| BAT | Bearer Association Transport |
+| BICC | Bearer Independent Call Control |
+| C5 | CCITT signalling system number 5 |
+| GCR | Global Call Reference |
+| LCLS | Local Call Local Switch |
+| M3UA | MTP3 – User Adaptation Layer |
+| MGC | Media Gateway Controller |
+| MST | Mobile Service Transport |
+| R1 | Regional Signalling System 1 |
+
+| | |
+|------|--------------------------------------|
+| R2 | Regional Signalling System 2 |
+| SCTP | Stream Control Transmission Protocol |
+| SN | Serving Node |
+| TUP | Telephony User Part |
+
+# 4 Protocols
+
+Implementations providing any of the interfaces or protocols identified in the subclauses below shall implement the requirements of the specifications identified in those subclauses.
+
+## 4.1 Call control protocol (Nc interface)
+
+| | |
+|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Q.1902.1 | BICC PROTOCOL (CS2) FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION [6] |
+| Q.1902.2 | BICC PROTOCOL (CS2) AND SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO 7 ISUPType of authorization requested by the I-CSCF.
If the request corresponds to a de-registration, i.e. Expires field or expires parameter in Contact field in the REGISTER method is equal to zero, this AVP shall be present in the command and the value shall be set to DE-REGISTRATION.
If the request corresponds to an initial registration or a re-registration, i.e. Expires field or expires parameter in Contact field in the REGISTER method is not equal to zero then this AVP may be absent from the command. If present its value shall be set to REGISTRATION.
If the request corresponds to an initial registration or a re-registration or a de-registration and the I-CSCF explicitly queries the S-CSCF capabilities, then this AVP shall be present in the command and the value shall be set to REGISTRATION_AND_CAPABILITIES. The I-CSCF shall use this value when the S-CSCF currently assigned to the Public User Identity in the HSS, cannot be contacted and a new S-CSCF needs to be selected. The I-CSCF shall also use this value for RLOS related registrations when the S-CSCF currently assigned to the Public User Identity in the HSS does not support RLOS (see 3GPP TS 23.228 [1] annex Z) and a new S-CSCF (supporting RLOS) needs to be selected.
RLOS support of the different S-CSCFs shall be locally configured in the I-CSCF, and this capability is independent on the subscribed capabilities received from HSS.
| +| Private User Identity (See 7.3) | User-Name | M | Private User Identity | +| Routing Information (See 7.13) | Destination-Host, Destination-Realm | C | If the I-CSCF knows HSS name Destination-Host AVP shall be present in the command. Otherwise, only Destination-Realm AVP shall be present and the command shall be routed to the next Diameter node, e.g. SLF, based on the Diameter routing table in the I-CSCF. | +| UAR Flags (See 7.19) | UAR-Flags | O | This Information Element contains a set of indications. See 7.19 for the content of the information element. | + +**Table 6.1.1.2: User registration status response** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ResultShared iFC sets
This feature is applicable for the SAR/SAA and PPR/PPA command pairs. If both the HSS and the S-CSCF support this feature, subsets of Initial Filter Criteria may be shared by several service profiles and the HSS shall download the shared iFC sets implicitly by downloading the unique identifiers of the shared iFC sets to the S-CSCF. By means of a locally administered database, the S-CSCF then maps the downloaded identifiers onto the shared iFC sets.
If the DSAI feature, as defined in 3GPP TS 29.328 [16], is also active with the shared iFC sets feature then the HSS shall behave as described below:
If the DSAI feature is active with the shared iFC sets feature and if all the iFCs bounding to a Shared iFC set are not masked by the DSAI, the HSS shall download the unique identifier of the shared iFC set to the S-CSCF. If some iFCs or all the iFCs bounding to a shared iFC set are masked by the DSAI, the HSS shall not download the identifier of the shared iFC set. Instead the HSS shall
If the S-CSCF does not support this feature, the HSS shall not download identifiers of shared iFC sets. Instead as a default behavior the HSS shall (by means of a locally administered database) download the iFCs of a shared iFC set explicitly.
If the HSS does not support this feature, no special default behaviour is required for the S-CSCF.
Note: In using this feature option, the network operator is responsible for keeping the local databases in the S-CSCFs and HSSs consistent.
| +| 1 | AliasInd | M |Alias Indication
This feature is applicable for the SAR/SAA and PPR/PPA command pairs. If both the HSS and the S-CSCF support this feature, different aliases groups may be sent within the same service profile. Identities within the same service profile that are aliases shall be sent with identical alias group ID.
If the S-CSCF does not support this feature, the HSS shall send within the service profile only those identities that are aliases. Public User Identities that are not aliases of each other shall be sent in different service profiles even if these service profiles have exactly the same Core Network Service Authorization, Initial Filter Criteria, and Shared iFC Set information and these service profiles only differ in the contained Public User Identities. This is done in order to allow backwards compatibility since part of the handling of aliases in the S-CSCF was there before this indication was required and it applied to identities that share the same service profile and implicit registration set. In this case, the S-CSCF does not provide any additional treatment of aliases than that which existed before this indication was required.
If the HSS does not support this feature, no special default behaviour is required for the S-CSCF.
Note: All identities included in a single SAA or PPR command are always within one implicit registration set.
| +| 2 | IMSRestorationInd | O |IMS Restoration Indication
This feature is applicable for the UAR/UAA, LIR/LIA, SAR/SAA command pairs.
If both the HSS and the I-CSCF support this feature, in case the S-CSCF currently assigned in the HSS to the Public User Identity cannot be contacted the I-CSCF shall trigger the assignment of a new S-CSCF.
If both the HSS and the S-CSCF support this feature, the S-CSCF shall send S-CSCF Restoration Information to the HSS. The HSS shall send this information element in SAA to the S-CSCF when required.
If the S-CSCF does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the IMS Restoration Information to the S-CSCF.
| + +| | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 3 | P-CSCF-Restoration-mechanism | O | HSS-based P-CSCF Restoration mechanism.Transaction ID = z
Context ID = Null/Context ID/ALL
Termination ID =
Termination/Root/ALL(see NOTE1)
Audit Descriptor =
Empty/
IndAuditParameter:=
IndAudMediaDescriptor:=
TermStateDescriptor (NOTE3)
Packages (See NOTE2)
Audit Descriptor = IndAuditParameter:= IndAudMediaDescriptor:=
IndAudTerminationStateDescriptor:= SDPCapNeg Supported Capabilities (NOTE4)
NOTE1: "All" shall refer to 1 TDM group. 1 TDM group is at a T1/E1 level It shall not be used for ATM or IP termination.
"Termination" may be used for individual TDM, IP or ATM terminations.
NOTE2: Packages is for
- Null/Root Combination
NOTE3: Pre Rel6 this is performed with Audit Token
NOTE4: Used for auditing SDPCapNeg Extensions when SDPCapNeg signalling to the gateway is supported.
| | + +Upon reception of the command in the MGW: + +- The Service State returns the current Service State +- When Packages are requested, the Package Names and Versions are returned + +The following table illustrates the allowed combinations that can be obtained with the AuditValue Command: + +**Table 14.1.10.2: Combinations of AuditValue Command** + +| ContextID | TerminationID | Information Obtained | +|-----------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Specific | Wildcard | Audit of matching Terminations in a Context | +| Specific | Specific | Audit of a single Termination in a Context | +| Null | Root | Audit of Media Gateway state and events | +| Null | Wildcard | Audit of all matching TDM T1/E1 level Terminations in the null Context | +| Null | Specific | Audit of a single Termination outside of any Context | +| All | Wildcard | Audit of all matching TDM T1/E1 level Terminations and the Context to which they are associated | +| All | Specific | (Non-null) ContextID in which the Termination currently exists | + +**Table 14.1.10.3: AUD\_VAL.resp MGW to MGC** + +| Address Information | Control information | Bearer information | +|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| |Transaction ID = z
Context ID = Null/Context ID/ALL
Termination ID =
Termination/Root/ALL(see NOTE1)
Audit Descriptor =
Empty/
IndAuditParameter:=
IndAudMediaDescriptor:=
TermStateDescriptor (NOTE3)
Packages (See NOTE2)
Audit Descriptor = IndAuditParameter:= IndAudMediaDescriptor:=
IndAudTerminationStateDescriptor:= SDPCapNeg Supported Capabilities (NOTE4)
NOTE1: "All" shall refer to 1 TDM group. 1 TDM group is at a T1/E1 level It shall not be used for ATM or IP termination.
"Termination" may be used for individual TDM, IP or ATM terminations.
NOTE2: Packages is for
- Null/Root Combination
NOTE3: Pre Rel6 this is performed with Audit Token
NOTE4: Used for auditing SDPCapNeg Extensions when SDPCapNeg signalling to the gateway is supported.
| | + +### 14.1.11 Audit Capability + +This procedure is the same as described in the subclause "Audit Capabilities" in ITU-T Recommendation Q.1950 [23] (see 3GPP TS 29.205 [7]). + +### 14.1.12 MGW Capability Change + +This procedure is the same as described in the subclause "BIWF Capability Change" in ITU-T Recommendation Q.1950 [23] (see 3GPP TS 29.205 [7]) with the following clarification:. + +For Capability changes concerning the whole MGW: + +Service Change Reason Media/Event or Signal Capability Failure shall not be used instead the following information shall be used: + +ServiceChange.req (MGW Capability Change) + +MGW to MGC + +**Table 14.1.12.1: MGW Capability Change** + +| Address Information | Control information | Bearer information | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| | Service Change Reason =UP mode = Mode
UP version = version
Delivery of erroneous SDUs = value
Interface = interface
If support mode:
Initdirection = initdir
If indication on Protocol Negotiation Result requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "Prot Negotiation Result")
If indication on Rate Change requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "RateChange")
If detection of hanging termination is requested:
(NOTE 3)
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "termination heartbeat")
If Listener context: number of desired listener context terminations = required listener context terminations
If multiple IP realms: IP realm Identifier = required IP realm identifier
If indication on BNC Established requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Established")
If indication on BNC Modified requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Modified")
If indication on BNC Mod Failed requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Mod Failed")
If indication on BNC Release requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Release")
If SCUDIF multimedia call :
MuMe codec (NOTE 1)
If data call other than SCUDIF multimedia call and Access Termination or Anchor MGW Network Termination:
PLMN bearer capability = PLMN capability (NOTE2)
If GSM data call other than SCUDIF multimedia call and (Anchor MGW Network Termination):
GSM channel coding = coding
NOTE1: Bearer Service Characteristics shall be excluded when this property is included.
NOTE2: Bearer Service Characteristics may be included.
NOTE3: Termination heartbeat notification shall be included when requesting a new bearer termination.
| | | + +### 14.2.5 Prepare Bearer + +This procedure is the same as that defined in the subclause "Prepare\_BNC\_notify" in ITU-T Recommendation Q.1950 [23] (see 3GPP TS 29.205 [7]) except that the Commands MOD and MOV shall not be used, the MGW shall not choose the BNC Characteristics, the BNC-cut-through-capability shall not be used, BNC events are requested optionally and independently and with additions as shown below. + +**Table 14.2.5.1: Prepare Bearer additions** + +| Address Information | Control information | Bearer information | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| |UP mode = mode
UP version = version
Delivery of erroneous SDUs = value
Interface = interface
If support mode:
Initdirection = initdir
If CTM call and Access Termination:
State= ctmstate
Transport= ctmtransport
Version= ctmtext version
If data call and Non-Anchor MGW RAN-side termination:
Bitrate = bitrate (NOTE1)
If indication on Protocol Negotiation Result requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "Prot Negotiation Result")
If indication on Rate Change requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "RateChange")
If indication on Bearer Modification requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "Bearer Modification Support")
If notification on CTM negotiation result requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "connchange ")
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "termination heartbeat")
If VGCS/VBS context: number of needed conference terminations = required conference terminations
If multiple IP realms:
IP realm Identifier = required IP realm identifier.
If indication on BNC Established requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Established")
If indication on BNC Modified requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Modified")
If indication on BNC Mod Failed requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Mod Failed")
If indication on BNC Release requested:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "BNC Release")
If SCUDIF multimedia call and (network termination or Anchor MGW Access Termination):
MuMe codec (NOTE2)
If data call other than SCUDIF multimedia call and (Anchor MGW Access Termination or Anchor MGW Network Termination):
PLMN bearer capability = PLMN capability (NOTE3)
If GSM data call other than SCUDIF multimedia call and Anchor MGW Network Termination:
GSM channel coding = coding
NOTE1 : Bearer Service Characteristics shall be excluded when this property is included except for the case when bitrate = 64000 and then Bearer Service Characteristics may be included. Bitrate is optional for transparent data calls when the data rate is 64k bits/s.
NOTE2: Bearer Service Characteristics shall be excluded when this property is included.
NOTE3: Bearer Service Characteristics shall be excluded when this property is included, except for Anchor MGW network termination for which it may be included.
| | | + +### 14.2.6 Change Through Connection + +This procedure is the same as that defined in the subclause "Cut Through" in ITU-T Recommendation Q.1950 [23] (see 3GPP TS 29.205 [7]) with the following clarification and deletion. + +NotificationRequested = (Event ID = x, "Cut Through") is deleted and therefore only the Explicit (MGC Controlled Cut-Through procedure is supported. + +The MGW may support No\_Data RTP frames on RTP-A and RTP-CN terminations during the call establishment phase, i.e. when not in TrFO (see 3GPP TS 26.102 [26]), in which case it shall support it independently of the Stream Mode. + +### 14.2.7 Activate Interworking Function + +When the procedure "Activate Interworking Function" is required the following procedure is initiated: + +The MGC sends a MOD.req command with the following information. + +**Table 14.2.7.1: MOD.req (Activate Interworking function) MGC to MGW** + +| Address Information | Control information | Bearer information | +|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| | Transaction ID = zRemote Source Port Range
If Media Inactivity Detection Required (NOTE 1):
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "Media Inactivity Detection (Media Inactivity Detection Time, Media Inactivity Detection Direction) ") (NOTE 2)
If Sustainable Data Rate Policing Required (NOTE 1):-
Policing Required
Sustainable Data Rate
Maximum Burst Size
If peak data rate policing (NOTE 1)
Policing Required
Peak Data Rate
If Delay Variation required
Delay Variation Tolerance
If RTCP handling required (NOTE 1):
RTCP allocation
If ECN Endpoint support required
ECN Enable = "True"
Initiation Method = "ECN Initiation Method"
If notification of ECN Failure
Report:
NotificationRequested (Event ID = x, "ECN Failure")
If ICE is applied:
STUN server request
If RTCP handling required (NOTE 2):
RTCP allocation
If ECN Endpoint support required
ECN Enable = "True"
Initiation Method = "ECN Initiation Method"
If notification of ECN Failure
Report:
NotificationRequested (Event ID
= x,"ECN Failure")
NOTE 1: If this property is included within the Reserve Connection Point procedure or the Reserve and Configure RTP Connection Point then it shall not be modified by this procedure.
NOTE 2: Only for terminations with border control functions support.
NOTE 3: The event parameters "Media Inactivity Detection Time" and "Media Inactivity Detection Direction" are optional.
NOTE 4: The support of ICE received candidate, ICE received password, ICE received Ufrag are optional for ICE lite, as specified in 3GPP TS 29.292 [60].
If local resources were provided in request:
Local Descriptor {
Port
IP Address
IP Version
}
If remote resources were provided in request:
Remote Descriptor {
Port
IP Address
IP Version
} NOTE
Transaction ID
Context ID
Termination ID
If local resources were provided in request:
Local Descriptor {
Codec List
RTP Payloads
RtcpbwRS
RtcpbwRR
}
If remote resources were provided in request:
Remote Descriptor {
Codec List
RTP Payloads
RtcpbwRS
RtcpbwRR
} NOTE
If Sustainable Data Rate Policing Required (NOTE 1):-
Policing Required
Sustainable Data Rate
Maximum Burst Size
If peak data rate policing (NOTE 1)
Policing Required
Peak Data Rate
If Delay Variation required
Delay Variation Tolerance
If RTCP handling required (NOTE 1):
RTCP allocation
If ECN Endpoint support required
ECN Enable = "True"
Initiation Method = "ECN Initiation Method"
If notification of ECN Failure
Report:
NotificationRequested (Event ID
= x,"ECN Failure")
Media (LocalControl, Local And Remote), Error
When ADD commands exclude an Audit Descriptor, the MGW response shall only include descriptors which contained underspecified or overspecified properties in the command request. Furthermore, only those properties that were underspecified or overspecified in the request shall be sent in the reply. Exceptions to this rule are:
The applicability of this restriction for text encoding is FFS.
| +|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### C.8.2 Modify + +**Table C.8.2/1: Descriptors used by Command Modify Request** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| Descriptors used by Modify request: | Events, Signals, Media (LocalControl, Local And Remote), Audit | +|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| + +**Table C.8.2/2: Descriptors used by Command Modify Reply** + +| | | +|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Descriptors used by Modify reply: |Media (LocalControl, Local And Remote), Error
When MOD commands exclude an Audit Descriptor, the MGW response shall only include descriptors which contained underspecified or overspecified properties in the command request. Furthermore, only those properties that were underspecified or overspecified in the request shall be sent in the reply. Exceptions to this rule are:
The applicability of this restriction for text encoding is FFS.
| +|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### C.8.3 Subtract + +**Table C.8.3/1: Descriptor used by Command Subtract Request** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------|------| +| Descriptors used by Subtract request: | None | +|----------------------------------------------|------| + +**Table C.8.3/2: Descriptor used by Command Subtract Reply** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Descriptors used by Subtract reply: |None or Statistics
Ctmbits statistics are returned in the Subtract reply when related to a termination with CTM capabilities. Otherwise no statistics are returned.
| +|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### C.8.4 Move + +**Table C.8.4/1: Command Move** + +| | | +|---------------------------|-----| +| Move command used: | Yes | +|---------------------------|-----| + +**Table C.8.4/2: Descriptors used by Move Request** + +| | | +|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| Descriptors used by Move request: | Events, Signals, Media (LocalControl, Local And Remote), Audit | +|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| + +**Table C.8.4/3: Descriptors used by Move Reply** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Descriptors used by Move reply: | Media (LocalControl, Local And Remote), ErrorNOTE 1: For a BICC network with IP transport and IPBCP is transported within H.248 messages, text encoding is not recommended to be used on Mc interface until ITU has resolved the contradiction in RFC2327 [34] and H.248.1 [10] on the usage of CR (ASCII carriage return 0x0d) and/or LF (ASCII newline 0x0a) characters e.g. in SDP these Characters are missing when using the currently specified "quotedString" type.
NOTE 2: Binary encoding is strongly recommended if only one encoding is selected to ensure interoperability.
NOTE 3: The binary encoding rules which are applicable to the defined Abstract Syntaxes are the Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax Notation One, defined in ITU-T Recommendation X.690 [41]. Specifically in accordance with ITU-T Recommendation X.690 [41] section 7.3, alternative encodings based on the definite and indefinite form of length are permitted by the basic encoding rules as a sender's option. Receivers shall support both alternatives.
| | + +## C.10 Transactions + +**Table C.10/1: Transactions per Message** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| Maximum number of TransactionRequests / TransactionReplies / TransResponseAcks / Segment Replies per message: | 10 | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| + +**Table C.10/2: Commands per Transaction Requests** + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| Maximum number of commands per TransactionRequest: | Unspecified | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------| + +**Table C.10/3: Commands per Transaction Reply** + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| Maximum number of commands per TransactionReply: | Unspecified | +| NOTE: For auditing with wildcarded requests (e.g TDM E1) then the reply may include up to 32 commands to indicate the termination state) | | + +**Table C.10/4: Optional Commands** + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------|-----| +| Commands able to be marked "Optional": | ALL | +|-----------------------------------------------|-----| + +**Table C.10/5: Commands for Wildcarded Responses** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| Wildcarded responses may be requested for: | Modify, Subtract, AuditValue | +|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------| + +**Table C.10/6: Procedures for Wildcarded Responses** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| Procedures that make use of wildcarded responses: | Release Bearer, Release Termination, Audit Value | +| NOTE: Used when multiple terminations are released with one command and in audit responses where multiple terminations are implied by the audit request. | | + +**Table C.10/7: Transaction Timers** + +| Transaction Timer: | Value | +|------------------------------------------|--------------| +| normalMGExecutionTime | Provisioned | +| normalMGCExecutionTime | Provisioned | +| MGOriginatedPendingLimit | Provisioned | +| MGCOOriginatedPendingLimit | Provisioned | +| MGProvisionalResponseTimerValue | Provisioned | +| MGCPProvisionalResponseTimerValue | Provisioned | + +## C.11 Messages + +The MGC/MGW shall be named according to the naming structure of the underlying transport protocol which carries the H.248 protocol. + +## C.12 Transport + +**Table C.12/1: Transport** + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Supported Transports: |The session name (s=) line contains a single field:
s= <session-name>.
The MG shall return the value received from the MGC or if there is no s-line sent by the MGC, the MG shall populate this line as follows:
- "s=" (NOTE 1)
Allow location by any LCS client
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 13 | LCS-CallSessionRelated (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by any value added LCS client to which a call/session is established from the target UE
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 14 | LCS-CallSessionUnrelated (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by designated external value added LCS clients
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 15 | LCS-PLMNOperator (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by designated PLMN operator LCS clients
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 16 | LCS-ServiceType (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by LCS clients of a designated LCS service type
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 17 | LCS-all-MOLR-SS (NOTE 1) | O |All Mobile Originating Location Request Classes
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. Over S6d interface, this feature is applicable when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface.
If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that MME or SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|-------------------------------------|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 18 | LCS-BasicSelf Location (NOTE 1) | O |Allow an MS to request its own location
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. Over S6d interface, this feature is applicable when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 19 | LCS-AutonomousSelfLocation (NOTE 1) | O |Allow an MS to perform self location without interaction with the PLMN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. Over S6d interface, this feature is applicable when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 20 | LCS-TransferToThirdParty | O |Allow an MS to request transfer of its location to another LCS client
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. Over S6d interface, this feature is applicable when the SGSN supports MAP based Lg interface. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 21 | SM-MO-PP (NOTE 1) | O |Short Message MO-PP
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 22 | Barring-Outgoing Calls | O |Barring of Outgoing Calls
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 23 | BAOC | O |Barring of all outgoing calls
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs. If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME or SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|--------------------------------------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 24 | BOIC | O |Barring of outgoing international calls
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 25 | BOICExHC | O |Barring of outgoing international calls except those directed to the home PLMN Country
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs.
If the MME or SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME or SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 26 | UE-Reachability-Notification | O |UE Reachability Notification
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support the UE-Reachability-Notifications, the HSS shall not set the "UE-Reachability-Request" bit in IDR-Flags in subsequent IDR commands towards that MME or SGSN.
| +| 27 | T-ADS Data Retrieval | O |Terminating Access Domain Selection Data Retrieval
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support the retrieval of T-ADS data via IDR/IDA commands, the HSS shall not set the "T-ADS Data Request" bit in IDR-Flags in subsequent IDR commands towards that MME or SGSN.
| +| 28 | State/Location-Information-Retrieval | O |State/Location Information Retrieval
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support State/Location Information Retrieval, the HSS shall not set the "EPS User State Request", "EPS Location Information Request" or "Current Location Request" bits in IDR-Flags in subsequent IDR commands towards that MME or SGSN.
| +| 29 | Partial Purge | O |Partial Purge from a Combined MME/SGSN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and PUR/PUA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the HSS indicates in the ULA command that it does not support Partial Purge, the combined MME/SGSN shall not include in the PUR command the indication of the specific serving node where the Purge has been done.
| +| 30 | Local Time Zone Retrieval | O |UE Time Zone Retrieval
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support the retrieval of Local Time Zone via IDR/IDA commands, the HSS shall not set the "Local Time Zone Request" bit in IDR-Flags in subsequent IDR commands towards that MME or SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 31 | Additional MSISDN | O |Additional MSISDN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA, IDR/IDA and DSR/DSA command pairs, over S6a and S6d.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support A-MSISDN, the HSS shall populate the MSISDN AVP either with the subscribed MSISDN or the subscribed additional MSISDN based on operator policy and availability and the HSS shall not send IDR with the A-MSISDN AVP or DSR with the "A-MSISDN Withdrawal" bit to the serving nodes when the subscription data is changed.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the IDA command that it does not support this feature and the HSS has already sent an A-MSISDN value within IDR, the HSS may store this indication and not send any further A-MSISDN updates to that MME or SGSN.
| +|Feature bit: The order number of the bit within the Supported-Features AVP, e.g. "1".
Feature: A short name that can be used to refer to the bit and to the feature, e.g. "ODB-HPLMN-APN".
M/O: Defines if the implementation of the feature is mandatory ("M") or optional ("O").
Description: A clear textual description of the feature.
NOTE 1: If both bits, corresponding to the feature defined for Lg interface and Lgd interface respectively, are not set, and the HSS supports the feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA and IDR.
SMS in MME
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA, IDR/IDA, DSR/DSA, NOR/NOA command pairs, over S6a.
It is used by the MME to notify the HSS it is capable of SMS transfer without the need of establishing an SGs association with an MSC.
If the MME does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related SMS information to the MME within ULA.
If the MME does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related SMS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further SMS information to that MME.
If the HSS does not support this feature, the HSS shall ignore any request for a registration for SMS; the MME may store this feature indication, and not send any further request for a registration for SMS to the HSS.
| +| 1 | SMS in SGSN | O |SMS in SGSN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA command pair, over S6d.
If the SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support this feature, the HSS shall not indicate "SMS in SGSN Allowed" to the SGSN.
| +| 2 | Dia-LCS-all-PrivExcep (NOTE 1) | O |All LCS Privacy Exception Classes
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 3 | Dia-LCS-Universal (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by any LCS client
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 4 | Dia-LCS-CallSessionRelated (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by any value added LCS client to which a call/session is established from the target UE
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 5 | Dia-LCS-CallSessionUnrelated (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by designated external value added LCS clients
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface.
If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|-----------------------------------------|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 6 | Dia-LCS-PLMNOperator (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by designated PLMN operator LCS clients
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 7 | Dia-LCS-ServiceType (NOTE 1) | O |Allow location by LCS clients of a designated LCS service type
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 8 | Dia-LCS-all-MOLR-SS (NOTE 1) | O |All Mobile Originating Location Request Classes
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 9 | Dia-LCS-BasicSelfLocation (NOTE 1) | O |Allow an MS to request its own location
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 10 | Dia-LCS-AutonomousSelfLocation (NOTE 1) | O |Allow an MS to perform self location without interaction with the PLMN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 11 | Dia-LCS-TransferToThirdParty (NOTE 1) | O |Allow an MS to request transfer of its location to another LCS client
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6d interface, when the SGSN supports Diameter based Lgd interface. If the SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA.
If the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related LCS information within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further LCS information to that SGSN.
| +| 12 | Gdd-in-SGSN | O |Support of Diameter based Gdd interface for SMS in SGSN
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA command pair over S6d, when the SGSN supports the Diameter based Gdd interface for SMS in SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|----------------------------|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 13 | Optimized-LCS-Proc-Support | O |Support for the optimized LCS procedure
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA command pair over S6a/S6d, when the network supports ISR and when the node is combined MME/SGSN and supports optimized LCS procedure as described in 3GPP TS 29.172 [47] clause 6.2.2.
| +| 14 | SGSN CAMEL Capability | O |Support of SGSN CAMEL Capability
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA command pair over S6d, when the SGSN supports the CAMEL capability.
| +| 15 | ProSe Capability | O |Support of ProSe Capability
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d), when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports the ProSe capability.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related ProSe subscription data to the MME or combined MME/SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related ProSe subscription data within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further ProSe subscription data to that MME.
| +| 16 | P-CSCF Restoration | O |Support of P-CSCF Restoration
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a or S6d interfaces, when the MME or SGSN supports the execution of the P-CSCF restoration procedures.
If the MME or the SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in ULR, the HSS shall not send subsequent IDR commands requesting the execution of HSS-based P-CSCF restoration procedures, as described in 3GPP TS 23.380 [51] clause 5.4.
| +| 17 | Reset-IDs | O |Support of Reset-IDs
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA and DSR/DSA and RSR/RSA command pairs over the S6a and S6d interfaces.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the ULR command that it does not support Reset-IDs, the HSS shall not include Reset-ID AVPs in RSR commands sent to that MME or SGSN.
If the MME or SGSN indicates that it does not support this feature in IDA, and the HSS has already sent a Reset-ID value within IDR, the HSS may store this indication and not send any further Reset-ID updates to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 18 | Communication-Pattern | O |Support of AESE communication patterns
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d), when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports the AESE communication patterns.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not indicate the support for this feature, the HSS shall not send CP parameter sets to the MME or combined MME/SGSN within IDR/ULA command.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN indicates that it does not support this feature in IDA, and the HSS has already sent CP parameter sets within IDR, the HSS may store this indication and not send any further updates related to CP parameter sets to that MME or combined MME/SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|-------------------------|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 19 | Monitoring-Event | O |Support of Monitoring Event
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a or S6d interfaces, when the MME or SGSN supports the Monitoring event feature.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in ULR, the HSS shall not send Monitoring event configuration data to the MME or SGSN within ULA and shall not send subsequent IDR commands requesting the configuration of Monitoring events in the MME or SGSN.
If the MME or SGSN indicates that it does not support this feature in IDA, and the HSS has already sent Monitoring event configuration data within IDR, the HSS may store this indication and not send any further updates related to Monitoring events to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 20 | Dedicated Core Networks | O |Support of Dedicated Core Networks
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA, IDR/IDA and DSR/DSA command pairs over the S6a and S6d interfaces.
If the MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in the ULR command, the HSS shall not send DCN-related subscription data (e.g., UE Usage Type) in ULA, and shall not send subsequent IDR or DSR commands when such subscription data are updated.
If the MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in the IDA command and the HSS has already sent DCN-related subscription data in IDR, the HSS may store this indication and not send further updates related to DCN subscription data.
| +| 21 | Non-IP PDN Type APNs | O |Support of Non-IP PDN Type APNs
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a and S6d interfaces.
If the MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in the ULR command, the HSS shall not send APN configurations with a Non-IP PDN type in the subscription data sent in ULA or in IDR, and shall not send IDR commands with the only purpose to update such subscription data.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the IDA command that it does not support this feature, and the HSS has already sent Non-IP PDN Type APNs within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further updates related to Non-IP PDN Type APNs to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 22 | Non-IP PDP Type APNs | O |Support of Non-IP PDP Type APNs
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a/S6d interface.
If the MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in the ULR command, the HSS shall not send PDP contexts (as part of the GPRS-Subscription-Data) with a Non-IP PDP type in the subscription data sent in ULA or in IDR, and shall not send IDR commands with the only purpose to update such subscription data.
If the MME or SGSN indicates in the IDA command that it does not support this feature, and the HSS has already sent Non-IP PDP Type APNs within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further updates related to Non-IP PDP Type APNs to that MME or SGSN.
| +| 23 | Removal of MSISDN | O |Support of Removal of MSISDN
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and DSR/DSA command pairs over the S6a/S6d interface.
If the MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in the ULR command, the HSS shall not send DSR with the "MSISDN Withdrawal" bit set, to remove an existing MSISDN value from the subscription profile stored in the MME/SGSN.
| + +| | | | | +|----|------------------------------|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 24 | Emergency Service Continuity | O |Support of Emergency Services Continuity
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA, NOR/NOA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a interface, when the HSS and the MME support the continuity of emergency services upon mobility between 3GPP and WLAN accesses, as specified in 3GPP TS 23.401 [2].
If the MME does not indicate support of this feature in a former ULR command, the HSS shall not include the Emergency Info in an ULA command and shall not send an IDR command to update the PGW in use for emergency services.
If the HSS does not indicate support of this feature in a former ULA command, the MME shall not send a NOR command to update the PGW in use for emergency services.
If the HSS supports this feature on S6a, it shall also support the Emergency Service Continuity feature on SWx, see 3GPP TS 29.273 [59].
| +| 25 | V2X Capability | O |Support of V2X Service
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d), when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports the V2X service.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send the related V2X subscription data to the MME or combined MME/SGSN within ULA.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in IDA, and the HSS has sent the related V2X subscription data within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further V2X subscription data to that MME or that combined MME/SGSN.
| +| 26 | External-Identifier | O |Support of External-Identifier
This feature is applicable for the ULR/ULA, DSR/DSA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d), when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports the External-Identifier.
If the MME or combined MME/SGSN does not support this feature:
Support of NR as Secondary RAT
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d) when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports NR as Secondary RAT, and over S6d when the SGSN supports the indication related to NR as Secondary RAT (such as, e.g., the related Access Restriction Data, or extended QoS parameters).
If the MME, SGSN, or combined MME/SGSN does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send (in ULA) or update (in IDR) subscription data related to NR as Secondary RAT.
If the HSS does not support this feature, the MME shall ignore the bit "NR as Secondary RAT Not Allowed" in Access-Restriction-Data.
| + +| | | | | +|----|--------------------------------------|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 28 | Unlicensed Spectrum as Secondary RAT | O |Support of Unlicensed Spectrum as Secondary RAT
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over S6a (and S6d) when the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) supports the use of unlicensed spectrum in the form of LAA or LWA/LWIP as Secondary RAT.
If the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) does not support this feature, the HSS shall not send (in ULA) or update (in IDR) subscription data related to the use of unlicensed spectrum in the form of LAA, LWA/LWIP or NR in unlicensed bands as Secondary RAT (such as, e.g., the related Access Restriction Data).
If the HSS does not support this feature, the MME shall ignore the bit "Unlicensed Spectrum as Secondary RAT Not Allowed" in Access-Restriction-Data.
| +| 29 | Ethernet PDN Type APNs | O |Support of Ethernet PDN Type APNs
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a and S6d interfaces.
If the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) does not indicate support of this feature in the ULR command, the HSS shall not send APN configurations with an Ethernet PDN type in the subscription data sent in ULA or in IDR, and shall not send IDR commands with the only purpose to update such subscription data.
If the MME (or combined MME/SGSN) indicates in the IDA command that it does not support this feature, and the HSS has already sent Ethernet PDN Type APNs within IDR, the HSS may store this indication, and not send any further updates related to Ethernet PDN Type APNs to that MME (or combined MME/SGSN).
| +| 30 | Extended Reference IDs | O |Extended Reference IDs
This feature is applicable to the ULR/ULA and IDR/IDA command pairs over the S6a or S6d interfaces, when the HSS and MME/SGSN support handling 64-bit long Reference IDs.
If the MME or SGSN does not indicate support of this feature in ULR, the HSS shall not send ULA or IDR commands containing 64-bit long SCEF Reference IDs or SCEF Reference IDs for Deletion.
| + +Feature bit: The order number of the bit within the Supported-Features AVP, e.g. "1". +Feature: A short name that can be used to refer to the bit and to the feature, e.g. "SMS in MME". +M/O: Defines if the implementation of the feature is mandatory ("M") or optional ("O"). +Description: A clear textual description of the feature. +NOTE 1: If both bits, corresponding to the same feature defined for Lg interface and Lgd interface, are not set, and the HSS supports the feature, the HSS shall not send the related LCS information to the SGSN within ULA and IDR. + +Features that are not indicated in the Supported-Features AVPs within a given application message shall not be used to construct that message. + +### 7.3.10.2 Feature-List AVP for the S7a/S7d application + +For the S7a/S7d application, the feature list does not contain any feature in this release. + +## 7.3.11 Requested-EUTRAN-Authentication-Info + +The Requested-EUTRAN-Authentication-Info is of type Grouped. It shall contain the information related to the authentication requests for E-UTRAN. + +AVP format + +Requested-EUTRAN-Authentication-Info ::=