diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65f6080d7d614553dc4d4c32306efe1fd854235a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.104-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with latitude and longitude lines. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.104** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON TELEPHONE +SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +**CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD +SYSTEMS** + +--- + +**LANGUAGE DIGIT OR DISCRIMINATING +DIGIT** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.104** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation Q.104 was published in Fascicle VI.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## **1.4 LANGUAGE DIGIT OR DISCRIMINATING DIGIT** + +### **1.4.1 *Language digit (or language information)*** + +1.4.1.1 The language digit defined under § 1.1.5 above indicates the *service language* to be used between operators in the international service, that is to say, the language to be spoken in the incoming international exchange by the incoming, delay and assistance operators when they come on the circuit. The language digit (or information) must be sent on all semi-automatic calls. + +1.4.1.2 The digit (or indicator) to be used to select the appropriate language is as follows: + +- 1 = French +- 2 = English +- 3 = German +- 4 = Russian +- 5 = Spanish +- 6 } available to Administrations for selecting a particular language +- 7 } provided by mutual agreement (in System No. 5, however, +- 8 } digit 7 is used on calls requiring access to test equipment) +- 9 = reserve (see § 1.4.2.2 below) + +1.4.1.3 The language digit (or information) is either: + +- sent by the operator to the outgoing equipment; in this case the operator must send it immediately before the national (significant) number1) of the called subscriber; or +- sent automatically by the outgoing equipment. + +### **1.4.2 *Discriminating digit (or discriminating information)*** + +1.4.2.1 In all automatic calls, the position in the sequence of numerical signals occupied by the discriminating digit (or information) is that occupied by the language digit (or information) in semi-automatic calls (see Recommendations Q.102 and Q.107). + +--- + +1) See definition in Recommendation Q.10. + +1.4.2.2 The digit 9 (or its equivalent) in the list of language digits (or calling party's categories) has been kept in reserve for use as extra discriminating information if required. Such use should be for a call with special characteristics, but the digit 9 (or the equivalent information) must not be used merely to take the place of the digit 0 (or its equivalent) in an automatic call2). + +1.4.2.3 Combination 13 in the signal code of System No. 4 and System R2 and its equivalent in Systems No. 6 and No. 7, as well as combination 7 in the signal code of System No. 5 serve as a discriminating digit (or information) on calls to automatic testing equipment. + +1.4.2.4 In Signalling Systems No. 6 and 7, the equivalent of the combinations 11 and 12 may be used as a discriminating digit (or calling party's indicator) on calls originated by a subscriber with priority (combination 11) or on data calls (combination 12). + +1.4.2.5 On all automatic calls the discriminating digit must be sent over the international circuit or signalling channel by the country of origin of the call, and this country has to arrange for the automatic insertion of the discriminating digit (or information). + +--- + +2) For example, it might be thought useful to have an additional discriminating digit (or information) when a distinction has to be made between: + +- a) automatic calls, and +- b) semi-automatic calls set up in the outgoing country directly by ordinary operators, in national exchanges and not by international operators in the international exchange, and arriving by the same group of national circuits as calls mentioned in a). + +Such a distinction might be necessary because: + +- in international accounts, calls mentioned in b) are dealt with as semi-automatic calls and are not to be metered by the international equipment. +- for signalling, calls mentioned in b) are not accompanied by an end-of-pulsing signal. + +On Signalling System No. 5 the discriminating digit 9 may be used to indicate a data call by bilateral agreement. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90aa1646aebe802639108c44a2455dcff50b01d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:710c06688ed0dacb10b0ab5b36f7d99064edbe00c8f322d55102c6d96ac08f2f +size 17470 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..856edd620ee4881ec6f1a135962bd51e3761bbfd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ddba2538850c4cfb70d41737d953af441a7329636d9b7d86e177aa20e404d655 +size 8206 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9222faf1690acb361f72efc8150d5c8eed82bbb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:913ef64dac8b96caeb444e665db5b4486fff8ce2e346863e3c5f841913311a40 +size 88889 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e5f29bec5848ecda9bc974527e2731b40a29c0b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:047c89190bfc0eba641f201813e03f5d170cf82f49ca622c5d75e6ba0007a889 +size 23215 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..162af170400b6f627934beb9ca44c24e1d83735b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9fdb68f4021865e4920ae8508fbf4e32653a8682cc4e2d13944ac6bdbf013494 +size 79159 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb24057a35ced1e6ac94c9748eb882cd474c9a15 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:505a45398a0de3b80a69c3a0c6931501e254c2019c3bdeab93e9d2b8f01a2e6f +size 14666 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a3472689858b068ef469213682965325_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a3472689858b068ef469213682965325_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e67440cfef9d9c31d24ba7bda52f1df3383fb14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a3472689858b068ef469213682965325_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d4ab465230b1772cbb8c20668760cd2cc69db5863999763a83caa2ef5e70a749 +size 82803 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3b71a9e35e593f6864f9e9989918d69a330114c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:37388abc7e5455983d5fecd58c11f345fe3ca366e3faec2c373f9e11be65a4e4 +size 18424 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41fe0fd97ff0893abc3853ef9718adb3852f4b02 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5300e355e875c3e3b7978f5a949d5088ec22f8eb4bfb948466981957405b3623 +size 136503 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b5de8d42aec1e87952d4e0625434fa1a08d7bf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:369bb6dee6714ce2c88802034d9654c8da4771987ee20c89f0841bb8c354aa60 +size 115463 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c94549ae7826b2d637debce94d9f913dfea9c904 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:82fa7cea14f3e592d4ecaaa150b2c83fd3dd5480d997419ef3ee89f12e0da0f7 +size 26420 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b018b93a4b6980ea266279f84f3ce0c3d86fbf87 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1111-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2708168a5d8132b5d43fdcbe69a09de462d78173405268e6c27110fb9eea134e +size 59743 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bf18145ad031093d816f4c69415409060d9290b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:441726f8bc6d957437434ccc825babc9ec6424f5d268606884f93c4d94b1b5cb +size 33443 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ccd3885ec8ceac433ed5bc357ed7df259b010e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:025cb24c45c34416e99033ce29138f722dadd49db4a9eb256616d7d578df0bdb +size 34761 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b1d2ace98b916930c706363557b108fbf648b25 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9cd85ef2bbdf7ebf3bba5c9b0ec0776e64e2874d1196f1eef9adc0736cd1174a +size 36414 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36cf51f8ba07e44aa7a4b009f3ba08eb2b570b1c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:11780faeee75ba39ab4ed9de67a9e67abec0d9ba3068ebec661dea70c16e29d3 +size 4338 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..82b100f91c6ab7a0fa7fb8047095a80ad8182b6c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:20c5dc908cb042d8917420dff6c0ccf2e34c4b8f7643414dc3589ba1a5161108 +size 102185 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1fe317364a8c7c1195d880c5c257de042c60aea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:db59a3833493104ade31d41d947aba7c74a5063823292e06ee705e69b35cc01f +size 95472 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aaadb47ad7d09804520a0daca7de6f3f7e7389f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:07ea8a07eb141feaebb79e02ee22b803748bd866fbbe09b28495bba34bd85d08 +size 86938 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf9b529b323f68aa74ed7a600e2ec093db523e3f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5cce609be4445288308ffe248e7380746f288e16e2a3f5adeb37fc1a966cb3af +size 96568 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d1fbc1e7d6b273287cb41dee07380532f1d373c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:23a26bb042f9886766aa6b418ba38e4bd6ced612ae28e9c90660fd8e834837c6 +size 121787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54709dae1dc59040cd494b5b041cbe363293ee84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.2-200701-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:912e73c87eda3f140badbacfca4179013e2cb1293cc190e20f50f1a18a41513f +size 60961 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.116-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.116-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.116-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/024914144d624b7f5dc22aaa5c3967b9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/024914144d624b7f5dc22aaa5c3967b9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93511b0d4641a6a1a1abd39e53955712185ceefa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/024914144d624b7f5dc22aaa5c3967b9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c4574c3b460afc7f7b2cd3049e91d1876dcfa9e10f9df8daab39d03338dbff5a +size 70526 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/08f5fade508b5badd6175fa5e482132f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/08f5fade508b5badd6175fa5e482132f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfd844562536905ca0818b283299d4d05640dad7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/08f5fade508b5badd6175fa5e482132f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1821e9bc5e795b45375be37529463c217a5d7de36c72c2f7c2edf37c0c3e7a85 +size 168234 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/09797d4289ec96309d21a9a993153dab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/09797d4289ec96309d21a9a993153dab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78281bc7c13c395c426167d2f613d0669bd378b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/09797d4289ec96309d21a9a993153dab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ef78e590eaedd7eda36ab857009c84066d2a85061da2c3a2519ab628cd6e289d +size 47492 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0de91e9b714369b312bf3ab1853301ac_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0de91e9b714369b312bf3ab1853301ac_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84457f18173584a2ad718c59497024bbca676ed1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0de91e9b714369b312bf3ab1853301ac_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa614f8cd6971f93746c347e3d8e775b580180919fe03867cd6015819e6b6dda +size 40672 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0eb348bf17d67bf96326e07011d1c1ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0eb348bf17d67bf96326e07011d1c1ad_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73fc9e27b1fc2ff60fc6b8485ef152a4c61e2502 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/0eb348bf17d67bf96326e07011d1c1ad_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6c0249adeb3fe95b458ff4447800831c8cf1e60acfb2e2949b34841fa013065c +size 49201 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/126e772862105e7d64e4ef3f85a16840_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/126e772862105e7d64e4ef3f85a16840_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5511a8de9cc246082dbd43b5fb295118b3edc619 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/126e772862105e7d64e4ef3f85a16840_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac84d59559328c16e4e2eec5295a6af993c1956b51dca5af6459767631acc371 +size 43008 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/137bcfed81ada68ca5162ca5afed35c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/137bcfed81ada68ca5162ca5afed35c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..464a29b45fa9be0af0a9cb4883b7d07634dab1dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/137bcfed81ada68ca5162ca5afed35c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b4e58f5946d2a9a20fce93de102e3761918be853debad7bc5986b3a309a96cf +size 23915 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/15a7570852cac42d754e4a0e50b1dfbe_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/15a7570852cac42d754e4a0e50b1dfbe_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56f26e0fbd34101a7ac12c987335020577bde749 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/15a7570852cac42d754e4a0e50b1dfbe_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:12172da5a67a3b10610f37527562673516b3bb9b51e9345178bb88efe82e494f +size 44494 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/18d7d8de298d79e7bc87af5217f11203_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/18d7d8de298d79e7bc87af5217f11203_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..548f2936e8fe1797cfe7ee048b3a9e624b193b55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/18d7d8de298d79e7bc87af5217f11203_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:93b08074f91f521db0d3ad63b60f4e923fe76f892296d18e24975cd5ff3410e2 +size 36375 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/200e768e8ed91aadff59c651287d1009_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/200e768e8ed91aadff59c651287d1009_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af9f02a0aff37390961a50d0a88e74b2cf07a052 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/200e768e8ed91aadff59c651287d1009_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aab580de532284500a8a9ffd9c04077e361d8271c79de3a1a9533b60056d1d10 +size 61734 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/238754529581b74f0696943d436494bb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/238754529581b74f0696943d436494bb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff9ed4d665aaec9baf9be7536bba06549bd8eee5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/238754529581b74f0696943d436494bb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:79fc42cb7ae5d0a571022e77b65d246cf0f0d73bb80a7e1b70c0376100c96cd5 +size 103574 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/24ca460ee3381aee781887e9e586ec67_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/24ca460ee3381aee781887e9e586ec67_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e72af795ce94df3a84033c80bb0c38989c5f972 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/24ca460ee3381aee781887e9e586ec67_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5c32bc2cf900878f0a4ae16efe61394ed6e0bd5a3b3a34f0e4246541a3749789 +size 101482 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6005804a2612b5c1270de50286852cc3369bc8cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:507068c58a51efbaaf234c6bad20581b4e6585cac5651a8f247e82fd6393dbeb +size 20161 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34f91bff5e8c30e3c8df441e9771602a6af82d41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:94260b47a6164b875a28e84e7d0e0c8f5ae9dcd45319e96afcd3e8ab2c3db02c +size 163924 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..548413745b4d98c653d31c63962591b02de03f92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:17406d74d7ebb46734a24b04abc40f7b6896f5c51ae5b230a11d81d12377be37 +size 8372 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2f108a589e99e93fd7aa8fac626398c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2f108a589e99e93fd7aa8fac626398c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03594788db1dc9a28650a70dd169b1177aefa55f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/2f108a589e99e93fd7aa8fac626398c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ee9bedbc965e02c02f3839325c4cb5613a1b8b9ff3feca6951ea3f8a6739052e +size 5250 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3750b0149a6380885998ab3ca6a8787c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3750b0149a6380885998ab3ca6a8787c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efa37c432f01f00f047bb7b0dad8f90b9cb74938 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3750b0149a6380885998ab3ca6a8787c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4089cde999df221a5ba5155656c8e7b779338c6990f8fa4952372a8a568ae940 +size 11301 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/37806e0fc150d857046ebc7e47893d7a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/37806e0fc150d857046ebc7e47893d7a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80f7e9b05be0d4a59d12f3abb7ef8df70382045c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/37806e0fc150d857046ebc7e47893d7a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9e232b9c9a5ae047c1383970932e9c15db7f98b2d503910663d07469e279bfc2 +size 39568 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3abb87a27232fe2f2806b67f2e5e1390_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3abb87a27232fe2f2806b67f2e5e1390_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddeb4ca75f0ab988332736dc63dd2bacb782f347 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3abb87a27232fe2f2806b67f2e5e1390_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a6df72107e5ed902cd7412f8eaf8598720c676697418b3a1d10edec2b233a46f +size 41862 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d7df38d3526e2ca0e36f59e9fd7bb105df3d66d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:daf5d59ff1b0a2ab164d8e15d8557c298d2cb8b68d8f9408e6f6fde96fb5a544 +size 122106 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3e5f2ac33251e61ca84628b194d44ceb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3e5f2ac33251e61ca84628b194d44ceb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..527161c2f8c2bf9d8fbf9881604cee2d480d0b2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3e5f2ac33251e61ca84628b194d44ceb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:997c257498a4cb486a14c4027cd6ae2851fcbd76f74ffcb7be9dea12ca831a14 +size 192850 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ea179b463e612d0285714550eaf5c09_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ea179b463e612d0285714550eaf5c09_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f649530442d47d5089f945e007dbf229fe99479f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/3ea179b463e612d0285714550eaf5c09_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5d408f1a244322e290b6527cb5e8606f7804b790632fe5d4a655bc27bfe588dc +size 38888 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6cfd87ff8ccbc2b13ab207f41adc6e40a9dca23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5dc0f665171f9bcb6c9f33b6a728cea74a40673cb7b1ca793ef6adcbaa6fbe2a +size 28693 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/42d1ffab6bbf720e8421aeace0808924_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/42d1ffab6bbf720e8421aeace0808924_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ccbe4585931e6b3c4ead9cd0a0c2a34e2e7e4b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/42d1ffab6bbf720e8421aeace0808924_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cb51f8a8e0a9ccecdb28f0e3de822bf4e567e92413eb9accc67a482b403e5c68 +size 29255 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ccb606a72760a3fdc8a9d84c273125331cb5c2ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e3f6ffce706cb577d6daf1d2882e2bd2870491cdf7ff0ee0abe10bca4942b68c +size 39116 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4cf20a1cc0755dff37937135bda4e2c6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4cf20a1cc0755dff37937135bda4e2c6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7f2d763909298e70dd590927cd9170c4ddfd8e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4cf20a1cc0755dff37937135bda4e2c6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:322c64e2495ab986426d889f0f76d02264c9c41eef7352b6a95ccec32664dc52 +size 129064 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4dd5f00d74e7db5bbb2d011609bcc43d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4dd5f00d74e7db5bbb2d011609bcc43d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95fa3b1c66104d4e7da387bcde4f40c2af0c56c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/4dd5f00d74e7db5bbb2d011609bcc43d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:409345ef12497deea33f1421c3b76b18c1aa8238b84e4fdea3e21f4562e4677d +size 20979 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/50a63fe40eaa16cb8745c689fe8f8264_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/50a63fe40eaa16cb8745c689fe8f8264_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c85e83df043949397ebc65286454c19721c9457 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/50a63fe40eaa16cb8745c689fe8f8264_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d99c0660ed24cbb2206e719c283c4a41ed17a9d8d3365d6889b36e91582bd8b1 +size 25955 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/511f9b05a4c458937dd12c30936fd7d6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/511f9b05a4c458937dd12c30936fd7d6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..302964bb6aaf37df17b947d78eaffa286d3410fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/511f9b05a4c458937dd12c30936fd7d6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5a4c821984a64738c41e1115dbc95817d387f7fc6ce926e666b9da5046091946 +size 14458 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5525e7460947727851585808324e1f98_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5525e7460947727851585808324e1f98_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37cb2cfb2d942cbc05fdf4041ad68722b8c6af00 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5525e7460947727851585808324e1f98_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1ffc9de16208879407db7d8e7c504206620e40efc9aa63970c71f8344409a36c +size 44775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56887eb4a851f556d1b263bf90755686_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56887eb4a851f556d1b263bf90755686_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0de7c5f6601fe9772cafe41aefedffacd16e6945 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56887eb4a851f556d1b263bf90755686_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7389c8aaf139b3d9bde3dd6acd68a9b671ad784a283a47ff0e04c213192bea6b +size 84169 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56a5265d174ce056c1dbe5e7a60839fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56a5265d174ce056c1dbe5e7a60839fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b629729f352a99cd0990cba0ceb0722d1df84cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/56a5265d174ce056c1dbe5e7a60839fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5230ec7c74b18edf3489afbb3a7ce62de5e5826e5f04f3ddb3c0d7d76694db06 +size 17138 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5cf80bac69830ea773ac17c87e0ae24d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5cf80bac69830ea773ac17c87e0ae24d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4195c16a6abce2571efc6533089ed030272ecee7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5cf80bac69830ea773ac17c87e0ae24d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2e7ac03ecb271f8dc3e2ee1c71a23033d757ac748d23e336572934e2a881ead1 +size 24059 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5e05915b2a93a3b404422e0966a7c924_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5e05915b2a93a3b404422e0966a7c924_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f45e80ec9b647a62f4e1a78bf88d4b51a82c40b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5e05915b2a93a3b404422e0966a7c924_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:24bd3fb16e5e35879814c34410400bb7c53203ed72b768b5943898d48e9a3363 +size 83360 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5ec3284657e4df0df3653dd61d0ecd13_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5ec3284657e4df0df3653dd61d0ecd13_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d54c0f8bdbf550bbc8b9b9dc9ab44ee859eec2d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5ec3284657e4df0df3653dd61d0ecd13_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ccb7bc1cced9ade2e04a9082741406f4a5b24babc7b1fe3916a314749c7ec489 +size 42269 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5f0781dd750d507531d474aed1ff9df9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5f0781dd750d507531d474aed1ff9df9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eced75e075bfae287d4cd43f646ee7e27c941838 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/5f0781dd750d507531d474aed1ff9df9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4bf920819e5c5e9bc2982b495ead4b752a2fc44f89b448fc37c8c9dbb0e45ae5 +size 18076 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6059b0a3a051cc20b414d51a4e412f3e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6059b0a3a051cc20b414d51a4e412f3e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a4ece1a659524631117b7fab58e468ef500911a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6059b0a3a051cc20b414d51a4e412f3e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:76742cb557ad0899608c1e58f1dd367ca2477fb9c526b75e48e5faecd81decf5 +size 43756 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/61474739fd197587cfea52af9b6a3885_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/61474739fd197587cfea52af9b6a3885_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18c10579d6b7edb5740254f42dc11ccaf5cfe23d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/61474739fd197587cfea52af9b6a3885_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4822309b58c6e17c3638c21487977d7afaa75060244ec0a8960b5297a086cbea +size 47070 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6424fc1c7a7c26364a135780c1e479f9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6424fc1c7a7c26364a135780c1e479f9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ab07ba3e8cdcc062232cc9e25b833c88986f597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6424fc1c7a7c26364a135780c1e479f9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:773ffe53707eb3086bbda8dcc7e7f182517197a572c25c9f79cf678b5e9b13c0 +size 36944 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/64323b705244afc70bf77babdacb6ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/64323b705244afc70bf77babdacb6ce5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce1385d28343a5566569d7de50c48435104b09a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/64323b705244afc70bf77babdacb6ce5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:034322235f68b7424a95af56b2d9d005a7f832802386f119b744a268f13286c4 +size 60209 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/659defdb54c35d60d4bb11a37b583228_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/659defdb54c35d60d4bb11a37b583228_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41155aa1c476355b964c66977f55f26b27fc34c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/659defdb54c35d60d4bb11a37b583228_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3a4b19c7aec1510fe5c4c7843898366925ac3b5a80aa8acbc814c3d15b6599e8 +size 56216 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6762c05f927b2b9c2404c465ef0a8d01_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6762c05f927b2b9c2404c465ef0a8d01_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee29f5151ef350a468181abb51de7add5d21e5bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6762c05f927b2b9c2404c465ef0a8d01_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bb64d2f9321c0aa24942e214a831cea452e7006cf1615205ecaa5d6f8994403e +size 19895 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/691626a7032a642bb74793336c37e274_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/691626a7032a642bb74793336c37e274_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58f6721ffdc6bcf9bc72eba5ddaef8d26642e5ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/691626a7032a642bb74793336c37e274_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7669f6856cef83c5dc9edf2ad9ba5c13441260c63bfa1efbb51f76e3f469a2bc +size 120416 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6ca842602b0473809416a9cf0d4106a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6ca842602b0473809416a9cf0d4106a4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bd97097683e7f4fb2f54543254bdc67c58a4b4e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/6ca842602b0473809416a9cf0d4106a4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4717173aa52187fd22d9a244e4e392e52c81c2c73a46fe4b44f054900493fdda +size 26167 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/701f4311e49f346390759520fcd19af4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/701f4311e49f346390759520fcd19af4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e692655edccb41ee7a6767cb3d6f2f7e43edbdb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/701f4311e49f346390759520fcd19af4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eda88e374707d6fbf33f47d811d163a0db14fd45ffb8b3c4386d11121fa02a45 +size 125016 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/750b1652a4f4791b84c02aa755a1dedd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/750b1652a4f4791b84c02aa755a1dedd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d120a35b28e8370fb8db07780296c448087f489 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/750b1652a4f4791b84c02aa755a1dedd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9d1967ec694d4a94d67586440820a2326a3a941a176b29bc2306f653d9e4a187 +size 20942 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/78151e5dd542eada99ead8203dfce76b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/78151e5dd542eada99ead8203dfce76b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f93c3033a361e80b2926b4d0ea87d1a5d1ea433 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/78151e5dd542eada99ead8203dfce76b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4ea9db3f13022007f73f1baf5595e82b786ac845358a1441131c965d4022ed51 +size 59937 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7c6fd006fc4d304794392d41fab4ee10_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7c6fd006fc4d304794392d41fab4ee10_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5479635ba5a29a47e842d32b7b96a914a076437e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7c6fd006fc4d304794392d41fab4ee10_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7020a3500064ad38cf7376687e6fe806a1a2212e686a73d67ccc7f8df63ecfe7 +size 134531 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7f7211748473542096717109ebe5a9d6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7f7211748473542096717109ebe5a9d6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5df1328970a507462b3a26ccf63d5d33f092810f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/7f7211748473542096717109ebe5a9d6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c7a18a8a3371dd064bd444773a27b2b94ba7f1cbbdb423b35c6c1719a205aa39 +size 100806 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/819708f96460bb2b90e965ace616f179_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/819708f96460bb2b90e965ace616f179_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa2123dc20215e9d4a4607924813996161cedac1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/819708f96460bb2b90e965ace616f179_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c1c597c817a3565eb1daf7f0b6029e43b750c7befe8988ca58cb162802ee262d +size 43715 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/856f6b5a43a3ca2bf49b8446412dc6ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/856f6b5a43a3ca2bf49b8446412dc6ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c818c0b97fa5c5fb9f7f9de423852c685aae6df0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/856f6b5a43a3ca2bf49b8446412dc6ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:81519d4235c092a1f132f7c61295e02bcd6079c900ea7edc1977dbe06d00cfaf +size 45544 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/86986d4dfd54f298d7b9fa9f82ab3009_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/86986d4dfd54f298d7b9fa9f82ab3009_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80e1d0b43abcc74b43dd7acf2cfeddabe26b3178 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/86986d4dfd54f298d7b9fa9f82ab3009_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:352ac781018070eac297657a2a64596e163d52a7bc7edbfbdc074507b4d5b3e0 +size 23501 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/87f8b579bc67022e8dd0a0a50585fd4d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/87f8b579bc67022e8dd0a0a50585fd4d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e553233e41af6f7254d03db5b56ab8854b6a77c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/87f8b579bc67022e8dd0a0a50585fd4d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9afd510446a4ef72c0e47e0534efcadd7b108ba6e9da40673d121e757231f944 +size 79309 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88842d98d695fe6a281f8af82f9ac951_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88842d98d695fe6a281f8af82f9ac951_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a83bf63445fad91369d358479d7f7e54bf1e6de1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88842d98d695fe6a281f8af82f9ac951_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bc40a8432d106ae184112c18354ee59e438cdf91888c2c5a02478b6f0b52731a +size 33426 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88c92858439684b2103e88cb143fb98e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88c92858439684b2103e88cb143fb98e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc75e76350fff02abced73088e6c30705b3440fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/88c92858439684b2103e88cb143fb98e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7b4dbe37a6b27a1f59b12a4a442366da6c32931892165d39a3643132750fd95f +size 52430 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/893d65bf826925a7283359b1672010a0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/893d65bf826925a7283359b1672010a0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96cb1510610d74c769abf94df834ab791756bbbb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/893d65bf826925a7283359b1672010a0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:98fcc5a2ade833197f5ca3c7ce64a69de532ac5b3b76fc951191f9fd03bc7a13 +size 42318 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fd515e13053caf6eedd2bc8b465953ebb30bb16 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:544ea943cae2176c81f546393446335bdf269a78290cb469b35c92133f118bb8 +size 54511 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa7af28f8d1408b6fba54ca860b8af4470733687 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:76acc1f72f57437cbb43ef52c9eeecdf153953f63fa1c78852733f10ed8bc784 +size 20442 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/93bc9e79386c488b5f130ab90aacf464_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/93bc9e79386c488b5f130ab90aacf464_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db995079c526e821f6e39c86e2008de551a59584 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/93bc9e79386c488b5f130ab90aacf464_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9b94b943651c82e0cf1706fcb710d2315e38602b2c83be44d6feb24eddeec431 +size 24016 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a04ce6037caa9cadd42e35203d26520bfc89029d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f18b486774791cd6d76d814b9c4a7149e4d752ee8674cd980588bd9eec2657cd +size 104805 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/98e725c7b96935429b312ff8d22b6313_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/98e725c7b96935429b312ff8d22b6313_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b526276a985d4325b8e161e0edeef4594763933c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/98e725c7b96935429b312ff8d22b6313_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:93cd77f72737fa899c5618e6d3a8a8caa12a9d7d27738d80d4d51bbd628edb19 +size 36784 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9958beca8f65818eb0ff893647af94de_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9958beca8f65818eb0ff893647af94de_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..826ed49c57cc3f45d71e1fe6f5b98f656adc1cb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9958beca8f65818eb0ff893647af94de_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a61facb1df5b92e7d4cc39a90dd4ba0a326ec0e8ef4ba1f4236ba27036a69fff +size 42706 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ac8c3c5f82f3ec93caf43124af62cb2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ac8c3c5f82f3ec93caf43124af62cb2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de93ba11c638045617c277be4c5805496621dbab --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ac8c3c5f82f3ec93caf43124af62cb2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4fbe3c536169b0c38fedb3c2e9809ca52be4fb5375e5d838e7852add6fe590d6 +size 44875 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9d0d314eecc9c87cee25c0336bfe5dbf_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9d0d314eecc9c87cee25c0336bfe5dbf_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64db7c5eb4899390fc32caccb8ed8fb5bfd262f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9d0d314eecc9c87cee25c0336bfe5dbf_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:095d481a80232ebe7c2d0d7707a10f7e80d4fcab0db2a61e4c6c927ff3ef3598 +size 31265 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ee1d5bfebea866ee79cccb39ad313de_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ee1d5bfebea866ee79cccb39ad313de_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8534a0bb6b3f653de723313a8a297ef0537e583 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ee1d5bfebea866ee79cccb39ad313de_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d62331f7a23ca5196d9dc0e50aee942fd89296a3b482eb97a7cddf51925b3a33 +size 226444 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ef15a4afab1416db28b91184862a3a5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ef15a4afab1416db28b91184862a3a5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3cfaf4ecfe8239633ff3373dfc45bf27f535f28c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9ef15a4afab1416db28b91184862a3a5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50cc5c958b37fa392d1229628332d5acc02cbc89a7cfc3a1dc4a51041c13d183 +size 25621 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9f9fdebeade37ad92fdd68d6ea9f58ce_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9f9fdebeade37ad92fdd68d6ea9f58ce_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..954a5ef82ed9a0670fe705cb0a40c2722cefcd57 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/9f9fdebeade37ad92fdd68d6ea9f58ce_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1ba0b93c83acb09b933e386bd883047b81279110b5e9f04b329a49a60e2cd762 +size 18483 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef0544f41b1d92479a7699dbc4ed9dcf08f2883b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6b845bbff5f2ffff66d2491ebaa1d2d030fe8e1bb66fe97a60958b279d6252f3 +size 23230 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b0b9bc3067d012eb2fa3539217b9c34d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b0b9bc3067d012eb2fa3539217b9c34d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8328f365d057b7627b2ef974f96e23a5e70d15c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b0b9bc3067d012eb2fa3539217b9c34d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b4d6bdee74f0d90e0792af80055d368078fdb6623a02b18f5daf4da957a86464 +size 75036 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b35ea3e304aad7d350a9902270413930_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b35ea3e304aad7d350a9902270413930_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5b17bfbf0ab4f46a2b90275407579db451ada73 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b35ea3e304aad7d350a9902270413930_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:17ba74d9b699b4b419d0d9e01aeab7b6e1c570ed5097feacb6f1c029dc73b388 +size 134776 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b5ce6d659e1431289c2e79b01bf38a15_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b5ce6d659e1431289c2e79b01bf38a15_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2bf7f11a3162659dbda9464b95bad2c4cdaa1921 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b5ce6d659e1431289c2e79b01bf38a15_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ace6aeda5a659a88830ee8838b423292c6f60f79d6a69dc0debe71e9b4682b1c +size 42985 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6bf4a206c0b3632a2103f925db0c2b1d2d2e77e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e2abe0f80daddb363d181f74eb06be415efaafd7d4ee7420698aa7b456693391 +size 63360 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8efedb73292a798b3f2050f9335cae6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8efedb73292a798b3f2050f9335cae6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4e01cec7ba225f8fdc341af2f01395d8af662de --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/b8efedb73292a798b3f2050f9335cae6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3dbc975d569c0574677b7fdcf3a4b7658b7ae9c9135bef3b656eb09ca5b6551b +size 70774 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c06fd7dbef68a8b788158f2081d9d734_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c06fd7dbef68a8b788158f2081d9d734_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc92f5789058d0d462e1e0f03c382470316344ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c06fd7dbef68a8b788158f2081d9d734_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e72ca1a38a8dd736489815be1c99b849780c8609e624841120222f9bc9c7cfe1 +size 73463 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c15cb6383bc35906e6b3c7c3aac621ed_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c15cb6383bc35906e6b3c7c3aac621ed_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63a314311aad2ee23f8cb831d8c629fd24920000 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c15cb6383bc35906e6b3c7c3aac621ed_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:025acd0146f0827f578b3a5140b483201d36dd7f7764e6e0858f56bccb83f4af +size 18838 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c3254408eadbf152632a8faf16310722_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c3254408eadbf152632a8faf16310722_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac24b78f43dbcab930a21c67ab6c2a6bb571c666 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c3254408eadbf152632a8faf16310722_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a5f013da3058af081e9c854d3bdc58e59f8a39887d9da5f3305e64f1c17f4bd7 +size 138419 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c80e1284549c9914d0249b0e749c500a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c80e1284549c9914d0249b0e749c500a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4de28d7a896c83d3da9c0dbc8b4aaeb4d83e8164 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/c80e1284549c9914d0249b0e749c500a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:48c5155c6b16b637bf2274af68ec0660c60484ce8b20ab5ff64a4ebd95edeabc +size 138919 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cb9e3603e260c7b07aca73128586df80_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cb9e3603e260c7b07aca73128586df80_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6073a93a6923c4485a44c52895f85ad182715b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cb9e3603e260c7b07aca73128586df80_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:10be45fdcde80d945fa16551657d8446f0accac0308440da8771c8ea516cb5be +size 43753 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cccf3125a7354e1865653731de1ca03d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cccf3125a7354e1865653731de1ca03d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acd74114a5920339e664eb916ef50edeb70ac847 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cccf3125a7354e1865653731de1ca03d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1e2a1e1badf726805b435e370b4072ad5cce7bee8fd6a44d31d0c5800526c6a2 +size 56891 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/ceb6fe29e2d57711907569c31182b3c2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/ceb6fe29e2d57711907569c31182b3c2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2d9f5b4eb7519a454d0384a3a888f45071e8b78 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/ceb6fe29e2d57711907569c31182b3c2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0f6dd7830c68db373e1af10cb1ce38666792271a7ac3e6df9b05ab5415d8c49d +size 71006 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cf8650780cc9719622f013f33967b37c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cf8650780cc9719622f013f33967b37c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b62038dd50c60f4895d4e62450d0094d8e00380 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/cf8650780cc9719622f013f33967b37c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:15ab342e0359faed7644ec0c5e05897ba16704d22b55666781407b99acdeb7cb +size 80582 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00dcba238f1e9b7dbe3c8dbf315991be453db9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2731b405b96acda785698e1739e56910dcc99fe3621d903c33a9debd640a883b +size 118728 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d24991add1927bb17af2ee171454a31f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d24991add1927bb17af2ee171454a31f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4ca97f8cbfaff3c189d24231eaa5af9342559a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d24991add1927bb17af2ee171454a31f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0de7d402070f1db3969fba772d1737fd4b1a2dd7e9f2870f3e8fd7cea5f2f787 +size 45438 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d3253d5db64378db6e72b66b41067a5b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d3253d5db64378db6e72b66b41067a5b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2aa93aeafac4c49b94a60d308e83794095964106 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d3253d5db64378db6e72b66b41067a5b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fa10051f405eab8c757173fc2fd5a8e9a2d89c1b0953cb4122b495a0611b6d04 +size 46569 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d512ce4e3ac0de6c26d0e74a85ef2cbd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d512ce4e3ac0de6c26d0e74a85ef2cbd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2cb186af0c2cf6f62630c218353829c872c7ebff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d512ce4e3ac0de6c26d0e74a85ef2cbd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2dd728a900c1b178fca36c207aad6dd6c032394e1b39e3d1c7896613c94bdf5e +size 87240 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d579d14979ebeaa676740df2e3dbe024_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d579d14979ebeaa676740df2e3dbe024_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3586b8ebe16124f99bb9bd8dc372ad458bbbb464 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d579d14979ebeaa676740df2e3dbe024_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:991df18fc4e26fbf137b953305519e201b04018f529ac79dc0754f366160b8f1 +size 38635 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a320bfca4aef75bd14b6085b40b40f1122e53a0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:912e107a44dd4477b0a525740dbf4351d84277636e0296872e076589a0fb0ef4 +size 34509 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5fbbaa9e90d05e93be1a3ce7d9e1e2e5c4ab6e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cd4248609aed7595c3825e836cf945f594a94995950376d52436d5e3ab1a9457 +size 28504 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dc075f714892571abc5f74f1a76b80dc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dc075f714892571abc5f74f1a76b80dc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e6c176eb1e286cb60304d909dcf36806232beec --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dc075f714892571abc5f74f1a76b80dc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c55c07fcebe17a40d7f44d8265e188e9627702b741e7de134fbdbc93aa70773d +size 125592 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/de18140c2e0030a43004b58338467655_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/de18140c2e0030a43004b58338467655_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b28ee23968f7d4d8d39b099b4318ee7f33a298ce --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/de18140c2e0030a43004b58338467655_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ed0eb64835b8b871ccd097bf3a83a6a4afc9f402c9b01ef8ed67ea3ab9a6ff23 +size 43184 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dfd09f348b50c9255f3cfe67985db9bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dfd09f348b50c9255f3cfe67985db9bc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd5e2580fe983695ffb0fb1343acfd1cbf16c57d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/dfd09f348b50c9255f3cfe67985db9bc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1f59dde236b515ed0ebdbdca4bb42f55493c9048feb5053dc3c1bace91a06519 +size 76970 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e0627c8e3dfda5da1ee8d5a90c9f7489_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e0627c8e3dfda5da1ee8d5a90c9f7489_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0cb6eaea88c02531e2c759ce74efbcbdec53a00 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e0627c8e3dfda5da1ee8d5a90c9f7489_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7e9854beb1ffd662f038e83dad8e30cfef31b8bd2a6b0b5be0b4d178e4e350fc +size 32450 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e2b7490a3455c66c85db12872c78fcc3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e2b7490a3455c66c85db12872c78fcc3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7903a2053d9fde409bb76ece762c5a6f7c31859 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e2b7490a3455c66c85db12872c78fcc3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9141ab49226d884bc33f37686aebe89fed543a9b60ee9a1920f4f4f5018408aa +size 126124 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e3026761f1da20ee91832039701984dd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e3026761f1da20ee91832039701984dd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ea477e9a6b283a6551647bbd25dea983edfb021 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e3026761f1da20ee91832039701984dd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:708b5d7c9fc7c470e81ab28c0fc19c7b4e6b69b1955b6d6325fb17d666ca8e05 +size 33918 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e4e0e43b969b09f3ef8ed29722d4d427_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e4e0e43b969b09f3ef8ed29722d4d427_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..496a0b76779024f5ba398002d4cb838b2cc67db9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e4e0e43b969b09f3ef8ed29722d4d427_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8410e9c5277fa2a3d0cf7e85a9d82e2d53be1db79ae25a1dbaf8997f4732f411 +size 33763 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e9f6a9e6beb9ae97b392bf38b93ad748_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e9f6a9e6beb9ae97b392bf38b93ad748_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bb59ba4c41d24fe147790f4e29269019efe3f49 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/e9f6a9e6beb9ae97b392bf38b93ad748_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca3cb5bd2e60d901b749b4caae5eed52fb9717bbe9b4943c44e944da33d1b793 +size 86454 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f21295f56ab9da5a7ea269beb8cf4afe_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f21295f56ab9da5a7ea269beb8cf4afe_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fa6aa347dd4b53331642afb8213fb7928845160 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f21295f56ab9da5a7ea269beb8cf4afe_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d8323afd87d337573e637cea5f4cd4232824602ba3108d13e72dd9548ea14a20 +size 119076 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f4fdce3ce1c0fd291f31813f83d0d0d3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f4fdce3ce1c0fd291f31813f83d0d0d3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a68b0e3d6a5104349b31c58ba291636af872ecd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f4fdce3ce1c0fd291f31813f83d0d0d3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c431485adf425bb0fcbbcbcd507ba7e817639031ae70d6f4dda82111f0eb577 +size 24168 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f5f65bec185cd1aa9b13ff4d84f0deb5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f5f65bec185cd1aa9b13ff4d84f0deb5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98bac6d00a7ca2a1d6f66d1b1baa96195464a81b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f5f65bec185cd1aa9b13ff4d84f0deb5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8308e83a2ca9e01285a554490930b82d3739675edb628c54fe1e6dd7da976889 +size 36357 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02dad5cb237e35f95e5d58e86ade9b1c268f1c32 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a8585bcc738604c8ee56f733836d725d50d9c388f2224ebaa2b2aad21832367b +size 56169 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fd3cbb53e991f8209ba17b398f426e13_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fd3cbb53e991f8209ba17b398f426e13_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64f0e363ef570367746fb3d67c30fa0ffe6a836e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fd3cbb53e991f8209ba17b398f426e13_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eab28838d7614c948afcb2b7d3d6bf95f87727d98685d81aba5d5badc324b004 +size 28052 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fda85db2e355bb8e3edcd5a74bf3d673_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fda85db2e355bb8e3edcd5a74bf3d673_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d348165889dc2b6e84c042d1bf60228d025701e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/fda85db2e355bb8e3edcd5a74bf3d673_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d0af27fb0b30b1c32779f7327670b254f1b247bcdbc7580e1616a7d455c5d730 +size 105828 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff467f60f152e4c42786cf605e8534fb442714e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0d4bbbcbf9a9d55f28b790ff9bd6f62ab5400812a418b3975786b18df53c75d7 +size 38335 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..355c65946d7fe83bc7f5954d0a3b9fe26dd71be0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1229-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,6241 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.1229** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(03/99) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING +Intelligent Network + +--- + +**Intelligent Network user's guide for Capability +Set 2** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.1229 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +# **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# **INTELLIGENT NETWORK USER'S GUIDE FOR CAPABILITY SET 2** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation is intended to provide a detailed guide for the capabilities provided by Intelligent Network Capability Set 2 (INCS-2). This guide includes examples of service scenarios, as well as details to ensure an understanding and to assist in the implementation of IN CS-2. This guide is targeted towards a wide audience that includes Users that only require a general "talking" knowledge on IN and how it will be utilized, as well as Users that need a detailed "working" knowledge of IN in order to complete their work function within an IN structured environment. This Recommendation is accompanied by one annex and two appendices. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.1229 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on 15 March 1999. + +# FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation the term *recognized operating agency (ROA)* includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms *Administration*, *ROA* and *public correspondence* are defined in the *Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992)*. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2000 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +###### Page + +| | | | +|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 1.1 | Target audience ..... | 1 | +| 1.2 | Intended use ..... | 1 | +| 1.3 | Organization..... | 1 | +| 1.4 | Framework outline of the Q.1200-series Recommendations ..... | 2 | +| 2 | References..... | 3 | +| 3 | Vocabulary ..... | 5 | +| 3.1 | Terms and definitions..... | 5 | +| 3.2 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 6 | +| 4 | Capabilities provided by Capability Set 2..... | 9 | +| 5 | Service aspects for IN CS-2..... | 9 | +| 5.1 | Telecommunication service aspects..... | 10 | +| 5.2 | Service management service aspects ..... | 11 | +| 5.3 | Service creation service aspects ..... | 12 | +| 6 | IN CS-2 architecture..... | 12 | +| 6.1 | Functions..... | 12 | +| 6.2 | Functional relationships and interfaces ..... | 13 | +| 6.2.1 | Internetworking in IN CS-2 ..... | 13 | +| 6.2.2 | Other functional relationships and interfaces..... | 14 | +| 6.3 | IN CS-2 INCM aspects..... | 14 | +| 6.3.1 | IN CS-2 Service Plane ..... | 14 | +| 6.3.2 | IN CS-2 Global Functional Plane ..... | 15 | +| 6.3.3 | IN CS-2 Distributed Functional Plane ..... | 15 | +| 6.3.4 | IN CS-2 Physical Plane ..... | 16 | +| 7 | Infrastructure in IN CS-2 ..... | 16 | +| 7.1 | Overview of IN CS-2 specifications ..... | 16 | +| 7.1.1 | Single Point of Control/Multipoints of Control..... | 17 | +| 7.1.2 | Single-Ended/Multi-Ended Calls ..... | 17 | +| 7.1.3 | Mid-Call Interruption..... | 17 | +| 7.1.4 | Call Party Handling..... | 18 | +| 7.1.5 | Enhanced SRF ..... | 23 | +| 7.1.6 | Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction (OCUUI)..... | 25 | +| 7.1.7 | Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction (OCCRUI)..... | 29 | +| 7.1.8 | Service/Feature Interaction (Service Processing)..... | 31 | +| 7.1.9 | Internetworking between IN structured networks..... | 32 | + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 7.1.10 Internetworking with non-IN structured networks..... | 44 | +| 7.1.11 Security ..... | 44 | +| 7.1.12 Personal Mobility ..... | 47 | +| 7.1.13 Terminal Mobility ..... | 47 | +| 7.1.14 IN-TMN ..... | 48 | +| 7.1.15 Service Management ..... | 48 | +| 7.1.16 Service Creation ..... | 50 | +| 7.1.17 GFP modelling and Service Independent Building Blocks for IN CS-2 ..... | 50 | +| 7.2 Detailed description ..... | 52 | +| 7.2.1 Service capabilities..... | 52 | +| 7.2.2 Distributed functional plane..... | 53 | +| 7.2.3 Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP) ..... | 60 | +| Annex A – IN CS-2 service scenario examples..... | 131 | +| A.1 Example of the "User Interaction Script" concept: "Credit Card Calling" services .... | 131 | +| A.1.1 Assumptions ..... | 131 | +| A.1.2 Enhanced functions on the SRF ..... | 131 | +| A.1.3 Message Sequence Chart ..... | 132 | +| A.2 Service scenario examples for Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction..... | 134 | +| A.2.1 Call Forwarding activation request ..... | 134 | +| A.2.2 Call Forwarding activation request with authentication..... | 134 | +| A.3 Service scenario examples for CPH CVS approach ..... | 136 | +| A.3.1 Follow-on Call on request by calling party..... | 136 | +| A.3.2 Reverse Charging..... | 137 | +| A.4 Service scenario examples for CPH hybrid approach ..... | 138 | +| A.4.1 Call Waiting..... | 138 | +| A.4.2 Conference Call ..... | 143 | +| A.4.3 Meet-Me Conference ..... | 152 | +| A.5 Internetwork Service Profile Transfer ..... | 155 | +| A.5.1 Capability statement ..... | 155 | +| A.5.2 Textual description ..... | 155 | +| A.5.3 Assumptions ..... | 159 | +| A.5.4 Object modelling..... | 159 | +| Appendix I – Service scenario examples for "Timed Disconnect" service features ..... | 163 | +| I.1 Timed disconnect with announcement ..... | 163 | +| I.2 Timed Disconnect with tone or announcement sending, SSF controlled release ..... | 164 | +| I.3 Timed Disconnect with tone or announcement sending, SCF controlled release ..... | 164 | +| Appendix II – Detailed SCCP Called and Calling address information..... | 166 | + +# Introduction + +Intelligent Network Capability Set 2 (IN CS-2) is the second standardized capability set of the IN. + +The phased approach of capability sets has been described in Recommendation Q.1201 and has been shown in Recommendation Q.1211 (Refer to Figure 1/Q.1211). + +General description and scope of IN CS-2 are described in clause 3/Q.1221. + +This Recommendation is intended to help users who will implement or use IN CS-2 functionality. For this purpose, this Recommendation provides an overview of the specification for each IN CS-2 key function, useful and detailed information not described in the other IN CS-2 Recommendations, and also several service scenario examples. + +Capabilities out of the scope of IN CS-2 are not addressed in this Recommendation; however, this Recommendation includes some material closely related to Intelligent Network Capability Set 3 (IN CS-3) because studies of some IN CS-3 services/service features started in the IN CS-2 time-frame. + +This Recommendation is aligned with the framework of Recommendation Q.1219 (Intelligent Network User's Guide for Capability Set 1) and Q.1219 Supplement (Intelligent Network User's Guide: Supplement for IN CS-1) and focuses on the service, network and management aspects newly introduced in IN CS-2. + + + +###### **Recommendation Q.1229** + +# **INTELLIGENT NETWORK USER'S GUIDE FOR CAPABILITY SET 2** + +*(Geneva, 1999)* + +# **1 Scope** + +## **1.1 Target audience** + +The Target Audience includes a broad spectrum of IN Users of this guideline. At one end of the spectrum is a set of Users that only require a general "talking" knowledge of IN and how it will be utilized. At the other end of the spectrum is a set of Users that need a detailed "working" knowledge of IN in order to complete their work function within an IN structured network. Specifically, this guideline is written for use by Service Providers and Equipment Vendors (as described in Recommendation Q.1201/I.312) and by Manufacturers and Network Operators (as described in Q.1201/I.312). + +These needs within the Target Audience can be satisfied with this User's Guide as discussed in 1.2, Intended use. + +This Recommendation does not contain any information described in the Recommendation Q.1219 IN CS-1 User's Guide and only focuses on the IN CS-2 specific aspects. Therefore readers are assumed to have full knowledge of IN CS-1 to understand the detailed parts of this Recommendation. + +## **1.2 Intended use** + +The intent of this IN CS-2 User's Guide is to provide general and detailed guideline for implementation of IN capabilities provided in IN CS-2 which is the second standardized stage of the IN as an architectural concept for the creation and provision of services, including Telecommunications services, Service Management services and Service Creation services. + +This User's Guide is intended to be used: + +- a) as a delta document based on the IN CS-1 User's Guide in the sense described in the previous subclause; +- b) as a reference document to understand the relationship of IN CS-2 to the IN Conceptual Model (Recommendation Q.1201/I.312), to the previous phase (IN CS-1) and next phase (IN CS-3), and to the target architecture; +- c) to direct the User who requires more detailed information on the specific service, network and management aspects that are not fully described in the IN CS-2 series of Recommendations, i.e. the Q.122X-series Recommendations; +- d) to provide example service scenarios to help the users understand the usage of IN CS-2 Recommendations. + +## **1.3 Organization** + +Clause 1 introduces the scope of this Recommendation. + +Clause 2 contains the list of references. + +Clause 3 defines terminology used in this Recommendation. + +Clause 4 introduces the capabilities provided for IN CS-2. + +General descriptions for the IN CS-2 service aspects and architectural aspects are provided in clauses 5 and 6 respectively. In particular, clause 6.3 briefly describes the role of each plane of the IN Conceptual Model (INCM) and describes IN CS-2 specific aspects in each plane. + +Clause 7 describes the IN CS-2 infrastructure which follows the INCM principles. Subclause 7.1 provides the overview of the IN CS-2 specification items necessary to realize the IN CS-2 key functions and 7.2 provides detailed and useful information for IN CS-2 users not described in the other IN CS-2 Recommendations. + +Annex A provides Service Scenario Examples as illustrations of the previously described IN CS-2 capabilities. + +## 1.4 Framework outline of the Q.1200-series Recommendations + +The following table, taken from clause 1/Q.1200, provides the IN Recommendation structure: + +| Q.12n0 | Q.12nX | +|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 00 – General | 1 – Principles introduction | +| n0 – CS-n (1...8) | 2 – Service plane | +| 90 – Vocabulary | 3 – Global functional plane
4 – Distributed functional plane
5 – Physical plane
6 – For future use
7 – For future use
8 – Interface Recommendation
9 – Intelligent Network user's guide | + +The IN CS-2 Recommendations (Q.122X series) form a detailed and stable basis for achieving implementation of IN CS-2 telecommunication services. IN CS-2 Recommendations are intended to give the same degree of technical information as for the IN CS-1 Recommendations (1995). + +In order to prepare the next phase of IN (i.e. IN CS-3), the IN CS-2 Recommendations contain both complete technical specifications (with complete support for physical architecture and detailed protocol description) and incomplete specifications that are intended to be the base for IN CS-3 study. The latter include some services description and a part of Distributed Functional Plane (DFP) specifications. + +The following is a summary of the IN CS-2 series of Recommendations. + +### **Q.1220: Q.1220-series Intelligent Network Capability Set 2 Recommendation Structure** + +This Recommendation gives the structure for all IN CS-2 Recommendations. + +### **Q.1221: Introduction to Intelligent Network Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation gives an introduction to IN CS-2 by providing an overview and definition of IN CS-2 and by describing its main characteristics and overall capabilities. It defines the service aspects, network aspects and functional relationships that form the basis of the IN CS-2 capabilities. + +The following Q.122X-series Recommendations are based on the general framework provided in Recommendation Q.120X, consistent with the scope of IN CS-2 defined in Recommendation Q.1221. + +### **Q.1222: Service Plane for Intelligent Network Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation provides the architecture of the IN CS-2 Service Plane of the INCM such that specific functionalities and their interactions can be identified and described in other Recommendations. + +### **Q.1223: Global Functional Plane for Intelligent Network Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation provides the functional characteristics of the Global Functional Plane (GFP) architecture of the INCM for IN CS-2 including: + +- the IN GFP model for IN CS-2; +- IN CS-2 Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs) (stage 1) including the specialized SIBs, Basic Call Process (BCP) and Basic Call Unrelated Process (BCUP); +- the mapping of the Service Plane to the Global Functional Plane. + +### **Q.1224: Distributed Functional Plane for Intelligent Network Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation describes the DFP of the INCM for IN CS-2 including: + +- the IN DFP architecture for IN CS-2 with static and dynamic models of the Functional Entities (FEs) related to IN service execution; +- the IN DFP call model and service processing model for IN CS-2; +- the IN DFP SIB stage 2 descriptions to identify Information Flows and Functional Entity Actions; +- the IN DFP detailed Information Flow descriptions, including Information Elements and functional descriptions, as the basis for specifying IN protocols. + +### **Q.1225: Physical Plane for Intelligent Network Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation describes the Physical Plane of the IN architecture for CS-2. The Physical Plane of the IN CS-2 identifies the different Physical Entities (PEs) and the interfaces between these entities. This Recommendation provides typical example scenarios of FE to PE mapping. + +### **Q.1228: Intelligent Network Interface for Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation defines the Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP) for the support of capabilities required by the IN CS-2 target services over the IN CS-2 interfaces as defined in Recommendation Q.1221. Recommendation Q.1228 defines the Application Protocol Data Units (APDUs) which are used between the Physical Entities and the procedures to be followed by each functional entity to provide services. + +### **Q.1229: Intelligent Network User's Guide for Capability Set 2** + +This Recommendation is intended to provide both general and detailed guideline for the implementation of the IN capabilities provided in IN CS-2. It includes example service scenarios, as well as details to insure an understanding and implementation of IN CS-2. + +# **2 References** + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- CCITT Recommendation I.312/Q.1201 (1992), *Principles of intelligent network architecture.* +- CCITT Recommendation I.328/Q.1202 (1992), *Intelligent network – Service plane architecture.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.71 (1993), *ISDN circuit mode switched bearer services.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.704 (1996), *Signalling network functions and messages.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 (1993), *Numbering of international signalling point codes.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.711 (1996), *Functional description of the signalling connection control part.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.713 (1996), *Signalling connection control part formats and codes.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.771 (1993), *Functional description of transaction capabilities.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.772 (1993), *Transaction capabilities information element definitions.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.773 (1993), *Transaction capabilities formats and encoding.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1200 (1993), *Q-series intelligent network Recommendation structure.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1204 (1993), *Intelligent network distributed functional plane architecture.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1211 (1993), *Introduction to intelligent network Capability Set 1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1215 (1993), *Physical plane for intelligent network CS-1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1219 (1994), *Intelligent network user's guide for Capability Set 1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1219 Supplement 1 (1997), *Intelligent network user's guide: Supplement for IN CS-1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1220 (1997), *Q.1220-series intelligent network Capability Set 2 Recommendation structure.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1221 (1997), *Introduction to intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1222 (1997), *Service plane for intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1223 (1997), *Global functional plane for intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1224 (1997), *Distributed functional plane for intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1225 (1997), *Physical plane for intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1228 (1997), *Interface Recommendation for intelligent network Capability Set 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation X.500 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-1:1995, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – The Directory: Overview of concepts, models and services.* + +- ITU-T Recommendation X.509 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-8:1995, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – The Directory: Authentication framework*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.525 (1993) | ISO/IEC 9594-9:1995, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – The Directory: Replication*. + +# 3 Vocabulary + +This clause provides the lists of IN CS-2 key words, terminology and abbreviations, used in this Recommendation. + +## 3.1 Terms and definitions + +This subclause provides a list of IN CS-2 specific terminology used in this Recommendation. Terminology shown here relate with new aspects and/or new concepts of IN CS-2. Appropriate references are also indicated. + +**Basic Call Unrelated Process (BCUP) specialized SIB:** 6.2/Q.1223 + +**Basic Call Unrelated State Model (BCUSM):** 8.2.1/Q.1224 + +**Basic Service Management Process specialized SIB:** Appendix I/Q.1223 + +**Call Party Handling (CPH):** see 7.1.4 + +**Call Segment (CS):** 4.3.1 and 4.3.3/Q.1224 + +**Call Segment Association (CSA):** 4.3.1 and 4.3.3/Q.1224 + +**Call Unrelated Service Function (CUSF):** 3.3.8/Q.1224 and clause 8/Q.1224 + +**Capability View:** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Chaining:** 12.5.3.2.5 and 14.4.2.2/Q.1228 + +**Connection Point (CP):** 4.3.1/Q.1224 + +**Connection View State (CVS) approach:** 4.3.3/Q.1224 + +**Controlling leg:** 4.3.1/Q.1224 + +**Controlling SCF:** 12.5.3.1/Q.1228 + +**IN CS-2 key functions:** 7.2/Q.1221 + +**Distributed service logic:** 11.5/Q.1224 + +**Distribution of service logic:** 3.4.2/Q.1224 + +**Domain:** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Enhanced SRF:** see 7.1.5 + +**Entry method:** see 7.2.3.9 + +**Generic security mechanism:** see 7.1.11 + +**High Level SIB (HLSIB):** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Hybrid approach:** 4.3.4/Q.1224 + +**IN-SM core capabilities:** 4.3.2/Q.1224 + +**Internetworking between IN structured network:** see 7.1.9 + +**Internetworking between non-IN structured network:** see 7.1.10 + +**ISDN CPE:** 5.1 and 5.3.11/Q.1225 + +**Leg status:** 4.3.1/Q.1224 + +**Mid-Call interruption:** see 7.1.3 + +**Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction (OCCRUI):** see 7.1.7 + +**Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction (OCUUI):** see 7.1.6 + +**Parallel service processing:** 4.1.2.3/Q.1223 + +**Passive leg:** 4.3.1/Q.1224 + +**Personal Mobility:** 7.2.14/Q.1221 + +**Point In Activation (PIA):** 8.2.2/Q.1224 + +**Point Of Synchronization (POS):** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Referral:** 16.1.4, 16.1.12 and 16.1.14/Q.1228 + +**SCF-IAF interface:** see 7.1.10 + +**SCF-SCF interface:** see 7.1.9 + +**SDF-SDF interface:** see 7.1.9 + +**Service Call Unrelated Service Point (CUSP):** clause 3, 5.1 and 5.3.11/Q.1225 + +**Service Control User Agent Function (SCUAF):** 3.3.9/Q.1224 + +**Service Creation service/service feature:** Appendix I/Q.1221 + +**Service Management service/service feature:** Appendix I/Q.1221 + +**Service Process:** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Service View:** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Shadowing:** 14.4.2.1/Q.1228 + +**SIB operation:** clause 4/Q.1223 + +**Supporting SCF:** 12.5.3.1/Q.1228 + +**Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) concept:** Annex B/Q.1224 + +**Terminal mobility:** see 7.1.13 + +**User Interaction-Scripts:** 3.4.5 and 3.4.6/Q.1224 + +## **3.2 Abbreviations and acronyms** + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|--------------|----------------------------------| +| APDU | Application Protocol Data Unit | +| BCP | Basic Call Process | +| BCSM | Basic Call State Model | +| BCUP | Basic Call Unrelated Process | +| BCUSM | Basic Call Unrelated State Model | +| CCAF | Call Control Agent Function | +| CCF | Call Control Function | +| CP | Connection Point | +| CPH | Call Party Handling | + +| | | +|----------|-----------------------------------------------| +| CRACF | Call related Radio Access Control Function | +| CS | Call Segment | +| CS | Capability Set | +| CSA | Call Segment Association | +| CSM | Call Segment Model | +| CURACF | Call Unrelated Radio Access Control Function | +| CUSF | Call Unrelated Service Function | +| CVS | Connection View State | +| DAP | Directory Access Protocol | +| DFP | Distributed Functional Plane | +| DIB | Directory Information Base | +| DIT | Directory Information Tree | +| DN | Directory Number | +| DN | Distinguished Name | +| DP | Detection Point | +| DSA | Directory System Agent | +| DSP | Directory System Protocol | +| DSS1 | Digital Subscriber Signalling No. 1 Protocol | +| DTMF | Dual Tone Multi Frequency | +| DUA | Directory User Agent | +| ECMA | European Computer Manufacturers Association | +| EDP | Event Detection Point | +| EDP-N | Event Detection Point-Notification | +| EDP-R | Event Detection Point-Request | +| FE | Functional Entity | +| FEA | Functional Entity Action | +| FIM | Feature Interactions Manager | +| FSM | Finite State Machine | +| GFP | Global Functional Plane | +| GSL | Global Service Logic | +| GVNS | Global Virtual Network Services | +| HLSIB | High Level Service Independent Building Block | +| IAF | Intelligent Access Function | +| IE | Information Element | +| IF | Information Flow | +| IMT-2000 | International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 | +| IN | Intelligent Network | + +| | | +|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| INAP | Intelligent Network Application Protocol | +| INCM | IN Conceptual Model | +| IN-SM | IN Switching Manager | +| IN-SSM | IN Switching State Model | +| IP | Intelligent Peripheral | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| ISUP | Integrated Services Digital Network-User Part | +| ITU-T | International Telecommunication Union – Telecommunication Standardization Sector | +| MACF | Multiple Association Control Function | +| OCUUI | Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction | +| PIA | Point In Activation | +| PIC | Point In Call | +| PM | Personal Mobility | +| POI | Point Of Initiation | +| POR | Point Of Return | +| POS | Point Of Synchronization | +| PRI | Primary Rate Interface | +| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network | +| RCF | Radio Control Function | +| RCP | Resource Control Part | +| RM | Resource Manager | +| ROSE | Remote Operations Service Element | +| SACF | Single Association Control Function | +| SCCP | Signalling Connection Control Part | +| SCEF | Service Creation Environment Function | +| SCF | Service Control Function | +| SCME | Service Control Function Management Entity | +| SCSM | SCF Call State Model | +| SCUAF | Service Control User Agent Function | +| SDF | Service Data Function | +| SDL | Specification and Description Language | +| SF | Service Feature | +| SIB | Service Independent Building Block | +| SL | Service Logic | +| SLP | Service Logic Processing Program | +| SLPI | Service Logic Processing Program Instance | +| SMAF | Service Management Access Function | + +| | | +|------------|-------------------------------------------| +| SMF | Service Management Function | +| SRF | Specialized Resource Function | +| SRSM | SRF call State Model | +| SS7 | Signalling System No. 7 | +| SSF | Service Switching Function | +| SSN | Subsystem Number | +| TC | Transaction Capabilities | +| TCAP | Transaction Capabilities Application Part | +| TDP | Trigger Detection Point | +| TDP-N | Trigger Detection Point-Notification | +| TDP-R | Trigger Detection Point-Request | +| TMN | Telecommunication Management Network | +| UI-Scripts | User Interaction-Scripts | +| UPT | Universal Personal Telecommunication | + +# 4 Capabilities provided by Capability Set 2 + +IN CS-2 is a superset of IN CS-1. The objectives for IN CS-2 are the following: + +- Although, by nature, the IN is a service-independent architecture, it is relevant to describe the general IN CS-2 service capabilities. IN CS-2 provides network capabilities defined to support the set of IN CS-2 benchmark services and service features (refer to clause 5/Q.1221). These capabilities can also be used for the support of other services/service features that may not be standardized by ITU-T. +- IN CS-2 provides some functionality to evolve towards succeeding IN Capability Sets (IN CS-3 and beyond), in particular towards terminal mobility aspects – International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000), service management and service creation service aspects. + +Recommendation Q.1201 provides guidance on general aspects such as service implementation independence, multi-vendor capability, multi-network capability, rapid service delivery and service deployment. IN CS-2 capabilities cover all these general aspects. As in IN CS-1, the IN CS-2 architecture may be supported by, but is not limited to, PSTN, ISDN and mobile networks. + +As in IN CS-1, IN CS-2 focuses on normal call processing scenarios. Issues related to error handling and exception handling are outside the scope of IN CS-2 studies for the upper planes of the INCM. However, general information about error cases of DP processing at an SSF/CCF and subsequent actions which should be taken to handle these errors can be found in 4.2.8/Q.1224. Subclause 4.2/Q.1228 specifies several error types for the IN CS-2 INAP, and clause 16/Q.1228 defines general procedures for error handling for these error types. + +# 5 Service aspects for IN CS-2 + +IN CS-2 proposes benchmark services/service features to identify the network capabilities that should be supported by IN CS-2 structured networks. The set of IN CS-2 benchmark services/service features is a superset of the set of IN CS-1 benchmark services/service features. + +The IN CS-2 benchmark services/service features are categorized into the following three groups: Telecommunication services/service features, Service Management services/service features, and + +Service Creation services/service features. However, IN CS-2 Recommendations do not provide a complete set of specifications for all of these services/service features. In terms of terminal mobility related services/service features which belong to the first group and all service/service features belonging to the other two groups, only a part of Distributed Functional Plane (DFP) specifications are defined. The complete set of specifications regarding these services/service features will be provided in future IN capability sets. + +The set of IN CS-2 benchmark services/service features are shown in Appendix I/Q.1221. + +## 5.1 Telecommunication service aspects + +IN CS-2 enables a network operator or a service provider to introduce various types of telecommunication services/service features which are not supported by an IN CS-1 structured network. Examples of these new types of telecommunication services/service features are: + +- internetworking services/service features (e.g. Internetwork Freephone service, Internetwork Premium Rate service, etc.); +- personal mobility services/service features (e.g. User Authentication, User Registration, UPT service optional service features, etc.); and +- Call Party Handling (CPH) services/service features (e.g. Call Transfer, Call Waiting, etc.). + +IN CS-2 Recommendations define all necessary specifications for IN CS-2 benchmark telecommunication services/service features including the above services/service features. + +However, in terms of terminal mobility related services/service features (e.g. Terminal Authentication, Handover, etc.), IN CS-2 Recommendations only specify a part of the required functional architecture of IN networks. The DFP architecture for the terminal mobility is defined by introducing new Functional Entities and relationships between them. This aspect is identified as a normative part of the IN CS-2 specifications and is described in Annex A/Q.1224. Information flows and information elements are also defined for the terminal mobility; however, these are not identified as a normative part of the IN CS-2 specifications but are identified as an informative part. Information flows and information elements for the terminal mobility are described in Appendix II/Q.1224. Additional specifications necessary for terminal mobility related services/service features will be provided in IN CS-3 or in later capability sets. + +As it was the case for IN CS-1, IN CS-2 capabilities are intended to support services/service features that fall into the category of "single ended", "single point of control" services. + +An IN CS-2 structured network provides users the following telecommunication service aspects extended from those for IN CS-1. + +- **Flexible routing:** There is no significant enhancement on this basic capability. An IN CS-2 structured network enables a service provider to maintain control of routing decisions as in an IN CS-1 structured network. These routing decisions may be based on time-of-day, day-of-week, authorizations codes, etc. The routing decision criteria will be managed by the service provider. IN CS-2 extends the call model specified in IN CS-1 to provide additional routing flexibility. +- **Flexible charging:** There is no significant enhancement on this aspect. Charging decisions in an IN CS-2 structured network may be under the control of the service provider. As in IN CS-1, charging mechanisms can be based on locations, destinations, authorization codes, etc. On the basis of IN CS-1 capabilities, charging scenarios are provided in Appendix II/Q.1214 with the related information flows and information elements. +- **Flexible user interaction:** As in IN CS-1, the capability to support user interaction for a specific service is provided to the service provider. IN CS-2 enhances this aspect in various ways. IN CS-1 restricts an IN structured network so that it can interact with a user only through an in-channel connection. An IN CS-2 structured network can interact with a user + +not only through an in-channel connection but also through an out-channel signalling connection during a call. In addition to this, an IN CS-2 structured network can also interact with a user through an out-channel signalling connection when the user is not involved in a call. + +- **Multi-party control:** An IN CS-2 structured network enables a network operator or a service provider to create CPH services/service features which involve three or more parties within a single service instance, while IN CS-1 restricts up to only two parties being involved within a single service instance. The basic technique used to realize this multi-party control capability is the "Connection View State (CVS) approach" which is based on the idea of controlling multiple basic calls in an SSF/CCF at the same time from a service logic instance in an SCF. Moreover, a network operator or a service provider can create more complicated services/service features than those based on CVS approach by using a "hybrid approach" which is defined based on the CVS approach. The hybrid approach uses bridging functions provided by an SRF. These CPH services/service features can be invoked during the active phase of a call. +- **Service interaction:** In IN CS-1, general rules have been specified for basic call modelling. In IN CS-2, new service interaction processing capabilities are provided. New rules are specified for the call unrelated aspects. The content of the service interaction indicator is defined whereas it is network specific in IN CS-1. However the complete mechanism for the service interaction detection and resolution are not specified in IN CS-2. +- **Service interworking over network boundaries:** IN CS-2 encompasses new service aspects for the purpose of interworking over several networks that require technical and commercial agreements between network operators. In addition to IN CS-1 SCF-SDF relationship, IN CS-2 supports SCF-SCF and SDF-SDF relationships for the telecommunication service processing where the relationships across between two IN structured networks. Distributed service logic and distributed data processing are realized by using these relationships. SCF-IAF relationship is also identified for interworking between an IN structured network and a non-IN structured network although no protocol specifications are provided especially for this relationship. The protocol specifications defined for the SCF-SCF relationship may be also used for this relationship. Generic security mechanism is defined for secured access over network boundaries. + +These service aspects are realized by making use of network key functions described in 7.1. + +## 5.2 Service management service aspects + +Service management services/service features are listed as a part of IN CS-2 benchmark services/service features whereas these types of service requirements were completely out of the scope of IN CS-1. In order to meet these services/service features requirements, IN network service management functional architecture was investigated and a part of them was specified in IN CS-2 Recommendations. The rest of specification items including protocol specifications on these aspects are not included in IN CS-2 Recommendations but will be studied and specified in later capability sets. + +These service aspects focus on the network operator's management activities such as service deployment, service provisioning, and service management. After the deployment, service customization services, service control services and service monitoring services will be used in the provisioning and utilization phases. + +While IN CS-1 focused exclusively on the service invocation phase, IN CS-2 defines and links all phases within the scope of service management issues. + +## **5.3 Service creation service aspects** + +These service aspects focus on the network operator's service creation activities such as service specification, service development and service verification, and were out of the scope of IN CS-1. + +Although service creation services/service features are listed as a part of IN CS-2 benchmark services/service features, only a part of functional architecture for service creation services/service features is standardized in IN CS-2. + +# **6 IN CS-2 architecture** + +## **6.1 Functions** + +The network functions addressed in IN CS-2 are grouped into the following categories. The two former are enhanced from the IN CS-1 network functions and the others are newly introduced to IN CS-2. + +### **Call control related functions** + +IN CS-2 call control related functions are similar to those for IN CS-1 but the capabilities of the Service Switching Function (SSF), Call Control Function (CCF) and the Specialized Resource Function (SRF) are enhanced to realize the IN CS-2 key functions such as Mid-call interruption, Call Party Handling, Enhanced SRF, Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction, Service/Feature Interaction, and Terminal Mobility, all of which are described in 7.2/Q.1221. + +Refer to subclauses 3.1 to 3.3/Q.1224 for the description of distributed functional architecture and each functional entity (FE). Subclause 7.1 summarizes the IN CS-2 specifications reflecting those enhancements for each key function. + +Terminal Mobility requires introduction of new FEs in addition to the above FEs to handle mobile calls. These are Call-related Radio Access Control Function (CRACF), Call-Unrelated Radio Access Control Function (CURACF) and Radio Control Function (RCF). Refer to Annex A/Q.1224 for these new FEs. + +NOTE – Terminal Mobility related DFP architecture specifications are defined in Annex A independently from the other IN CS-2 DFP architecture related specifications. + +### **Service control related functions** + +For a single IN CS-2 structured network, the service control related functions within the context of a call supported by the Service Control Function (SCF) and the Service Data Function (SDF) are extended to realize the IN CS-2 key functions such as Call Party Handling, Enhanced SRF, Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction, Service/Feature Interaction and Terminal Mobility. + +In addition to the above enhancement, the internetworking service control related functions are introduced when multiple IN CS-2 structured networks are involved in a call. Multiple IN CS-2 structured networks can interwork together through not only the SCF-SDF interface (specified in IN CS-1) but also the SCF-SCF and the SDF-SDF interfaces. Refer to 7.1.9 for the internetworking between IN structured networks. + +Intelligent Access Function (IAF) is introduced for service control of a non-IN structured network from the SCF in an IN CS-2 structured network. Refer to 7.1.10 for additional information on this function. + +### **Call unrelated user interaction functions** + +IN CS-2 introduces a new network function for "user interaction". This new function is introduced to perform user interaction not only within the context of a call but also outside the context of a call, while an IN CS-1 structured network can only perform user interaction within the context of a call. + +New FEs, CUSF (Call Unrelated Service Function) and SCUAF (Service Control User Agent Function) are defined to realize this function. + +The CUSF is responsible for handling a call unrelated relationship with the SCUAF through the out-channel interface and also for handling a relationship with the SCF. The CUSF provides a call unrelated event processing mechanism to detect a request from a user for interacting with the SCF and also performs procedures as required from the SCF for call unrelated user interaction. + +The SCUAF represents the functions for the interface between a user and the CUSF. The SCUAF enables a user to interact with the CUSF for call unrelated user interaction. + +Refer to 7.1.6 for additional information on this function. + +### **Management related functions** + +Service Management Function and Service Creation Function are included in the scope of IN CS-2. Three new FEs, Service Management Function (SMF), Service Management Access Function (SMAF) and Service Creation Environment Function (SCEF) are introduced for these management functions. + +The SMF provides various kinds of the service management functions for each phase of service management, including service deployment, service provisioning and service utilization. Telecommunication Management Network (TMN) concepts are utilized as a basis for identifying the service management activities and modelling the IN CS-2 network elements for these management activities. + +The SMAF provides an interface function which enables a user to access the SMF. The "user" here means a service subscriber or a service administrator. + +The SCEF provides supporting functions of "service specification" phase, "service development" phase and "service verification" phase of service creation activities. + +Refer to 7.1.14, 7.1.15 and 7.1.16 for management-related functions. + +## **6.2 Functional relationships and interfaces** + +The relationships between functional entities for the DFP of an IN CS-2 structured network identified for service control and management activities are as follows: + +### **IN CS-2 relationships** + +SCF-SSF, SCF-SCF, SCF-IAF, SCF-SRF, SDF-SDF, SCF-SDF, SCF-CUSF, SMF-SCF, SMF-SDF, SMF-SSF/CCF, SMF-SRF, SMF-SMAF, SMF-SCEF, SMF-SMF, SMF-CUSF. + +Refer to clause 7/Q.1221 and to 3.4/Q.1224 for these relationships. + +### **6.2.1 Internetworking in IN CS-2** + +The following relationships are identified for internetworking in IN CS-2: + +#### **IN CS-2 relationships for internetworking** + +SCF-SCF, SCF-IAF, SDF-SDF, SCF-SDF, SMF-SMF. + +In IN CS-2, specific internetworking capabilities are assumed to be localized within the FEs supporting the internetworking relationships, i.e. within the SCF and the SDF. The internal architecture of a network is not visible. However, functions needed for processing internetworking are to be visible from the other network (IN or non-IN). + +The SCF-SDF relationship has been defined in IN CS-1 and it has already provided a part of internetworking capabilities. The new relationships SCF-SCF and SDF-SDF provide different capabilities for internetworking from those provided by the SCF-SDF relationship. These new + +relationships enable the requesting network to be free from understanding the details of service logic, data schema or data location in the requested network. + +By using the SCF-SCF interface, two service logics can communicate with each other. This interface allows the distribution of service logic. A network can handle a call without having a full knowledge of the data schema and the service logic as long as it can find another network that can help. + +The SDF-SDF internetworking interface has two purposes: the first is to provide a mechanism to copy data between a network and a maintenance of the copy data, and the second is to provide transparent data access. The following requirements pertain to this relationship: security, performance merit for no additional load to the SCF, data location management, copy of data, information updated, and data transparency. + +For the propose of internetworking, the SMF-SMF relationship has been identified as within the scope of IN CS-2, but no information flows nor information elements have been defined in IN CS-2. + +For the SCF-IAF relationship, the same information flows and information elements as used for the SCF-SCF relationship may be used. + +### **6.2.2 Other functional relationships and interfaces** + +In order to assist in the efficient development and use of the capability set, 3.4/Q.1224 provides a description of the use of the IN CS-2 relationships required to support the target set of services and service features. + +Service control related relationships SCF-SSF, SCF-SRF and SCF-SDF were specified in IN CS-1 and are evolved in IN CS-2 to realize the IN CS-2 key functions described in 7.2/Q.1221. + +The SCF-CUSF relationship is defined in IN CS-2 and used for the out-channel call unrelated user interaction. The CUSF may also have relationships with SSF and CCF but standardization of these relationships are not in the scope of IN CS-2. The relationship between CUSF and SCUAF is not the subject of IN standardization activity and existing appropriate protocols such as DSS1 should be adopted for this interface by the network provider. + +In IN CS-2, the relationships SCF-CURACF and SCF-CRACF are identified to support the terminal mobility function. Information flows and information elements regarding these new relationships and modification of the SCF-SSF relationship for the terminal mobility function are provided in Appendix II/Q.1224 as a part of the informative parts of the IN CS-2 specifications. + +Various relationships for the management activities, from SMF to other FEs, are identified in IN CS-2 but no information flows nor information elements are defined. Subclauses 3.4.13 to 3.4.20/Q.1224 outline the management activities supported by the SMF for other FEs. + +## **6.3 IN CS-2 INCM aspects** + +The INCM is described in Recommendation Q.1201. The subclauses below describe the IN CS-2 INCM aspects. + +For IN CS-2, some Services or Service Features are studied and described only in the two or three upper planes and will be completely specified in IN CS-3 or later capability sets. + +### **6.3.1 IN CS-2 Service Plane** + +IN CS-1 did not address the service plane because IN CS-1 was developed based on the existing network evolution into the IN concepts. IN CS-2 provides the first view of the "top-down" approach where services and service features are initially defined and then the network capabilities necessary to realize these services and service features are developed in the lower planes of the IN Conceptual Model. + +IN CS-2 also addresses feature interactions which were not included in IN CS-1; in particular, consideration on the methods to identify service and service feature interaction are explained in 2.3/Q.1222. + +A structured approach, as described in Recommendation Q.1202, is applied to analyse services and to decompose services into service features. + +Service plane modelling is described in 2.4/Q.1222. + +Clause 7/Q.1223 entitled "Mapping of the Service Plane to the Global Functional Plane", describes how a service feature in Service Plane is mapped to the GFP. + +### **6.3.2 IN CS-2 Global Functional Plane** + +IN CS-2 specifies two different views of the GFP: a "Capability view" and a "Service view". Each view describes different aspects of the GFP. The "Capability view" identifies the set of basic network capabilities based on Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs) and the discrete SIB operations concept. + +Other aspects of the GFP are described by a "Service view". "Service view" shows how global service logic is composed of SIBs, SIB operations and "High level SIBs" which are service independent re-usable components. "Service view" also describes how global service logic interrelate to each other in parallel service processing. Refer to 7.1.17 for more details about these views. + +SIBs can be considered as tools to identify information flows, information elements and functional entity actions in the DFP. These are obtained by elaborating SIBs in the form of "SIB stage 2 description". Subclause 11.2/Q.1224 provides "SIB stage 2 description" for every IN CS-2 SIB. + +In terms of a service control scheme in the GFP, the basic framework is the same as that of IN CS-1. A global service logic interacts with a specialized SIB for the basic call (i.e. BCP SIB) through the interaction points specified for both the global service logic and the BCP SIB. In addition, a new specialized SIB named "Basic Call Unrelated Process (BCUP)" is defined for the out-channel call unrelated interaction function. The BCUP SIB interacts with global service logic through the interaction points in the case of the out-channel call unrelated interaction processing. Subclause 11.3/Q.1224 provides the stage 2 descriptions for these specialized SIBs. + +IN CS-2 is also intended to provide management capabilities on the GFP so as to support management services; however, specifications have not been fully provided. Modelling of the management activities on the GFP consists in enhancing existing SIBs and in creating a specialized SIB, "Basic Service Management Process" SIB. Some guidance for this modelling approach is provided in Appendix I/Q.1223. + +### **6.3.3 IN CS-2 Distributed Functional Plane** + +The IN DFP architecture encompasses static and dynamic models of the Functional Entities (FEs) related to IN service execution. These models are used to define how an IN service logic instance interacts with basic call process. The DFP for IN CS-2 is a subset of the general DFP described in Recommendation Q.1204. + +The IN DFP detailed information flow descriptions, including information elements and functional descriptions are the basis for specifying IN Application Protocol (INAP). Most of the information flows and information elements defined in IN CS-2 DFP are mapped to the INAP operations and their parameters. However, no protocol specifications for the terminal mobility, service management and service creation related functions are provided in IN CS-2. Protocol aspects for these functions are out of the scope of IN CS-2 and will be defined in IN CS-3 or later capability sets. + +Subclause 3.1.5/Q.1228 indicates the mapping of the IN CS-2 information flows to IN CS-2 INAP operations. + +Telecommunication Management Network (TMN) concepts and protocol specifications are assumed to be used for the management related functions in future capability sets. Refer to Annexes B, C and D of Recommendation Q.1224 for the service management aspects. + +### **6.3.4 IN CS-2 Physical Plane** + +This plane identifies the Physical Entities (PEs) and protocols and indicated the mapping of FEs to PEs. New PEs, Call Unrelated Service Point (CUSP) and ISDN CPE are defined according to the introduction of new FEs in IN CS-2 DFP. The CUSP contains CUSF and CCF, and ISDN CPE may contain SCUAF, IAF and CCAF. An example protocol architecture for the CUSF and SCUAF is shown in 3.1.1/Q.1228. + +The mapping of the IN CS-2 terminal mobility, service management and service creation related FEs are out of the scope of IN CS-2. + +# **7 Infrastructure in IN CS-2** + +This clause provides overview of IN CS-2 specifications and helpful information not covered in other IN CS-2 Recommendations. + +Main points of the IN CS-2 specifications for realizing each IN CS-2 network key function are summarized under each subclause of 7.1. + +Useful information for IN CS-2 users not covered or clearly described in other CS-2 Recommendations (e.g. general guidelines, example cases or detailed protocol aspects) are described in 7.2. + +## **7.1 Overview of IN CS-2 specifications** + +The following IN CS-2 specific network key functions (or capabilities) are identified to achieve IN CS-2 objectives, service aspects described in clause 5. + +- 1) Single Point/Multipoints of Control; +- 2) Single-Ended/Multi-Ended Calls; +- 3) Mid-Call interruption; +- 4) Call Party Handling; +- 5) Enhanced SRF; +- 6) Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction; +- 7) Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction; +- 8) Service/Feature Interaction (Service Processing); +- 9) Internetworking between IN structured networks; +- 10) Internetworking with non-IN structured networks; +- 11) Security; +- 12) Personal Mobility; +- 13) Terminal Mobility; +- 14) IN-TMN; +- 15) Service Management; +- 16) Service Creation. + +The first thirteen functions are mainly concerned with IN CS-2 Telecommunication services and service features. The last three are concerned with IN CS-2 Service Management and Service Creation service and service features. Definitions of these key functions are described in 7.2/Q.1221. + +These functions are regarded as functional requirements to be supported by the IN CS-2 structured network. IN CS-2 specifications are defined to meet these functional requirements. + +Relationships between each IN CS-2 network key function and IN CS-2 specification items are briefly described in 7.1.1 to 7.1.16. A summary of IN CS-2 GFP specifications not directly related with IN CS-2 network key functions is provided in 7.1.17. + +### 7.1.1 Single Point of Control/Multipoints of Control + +Single Point of Control describes a control relationship where the same aspects of a call are influenced by one and only one Service Control Function at any point in time. Multiple Points of Control is the ability for multiple service instances to interact with a single call segment. The SSF/CCF may have to manage interactions between IN service logic instances realized in different service logic instances that are simultaneously active on a single call. + +IN CS-2 is still restricted to the "Single Point of Control" rule. + +Some clarification to the scope of the "Single Point of Control" has been provided in IN CS-2 timeframe (see 4.2.8/Q.1224): the DP processing rules only guarantee single point of control within a Single Control Relationship. Within a single SSF/CCF, many control relationships may exist but it must be made clear that single point of control only relates to each single relationship. + +### 7.1.2 Single-Ended/Multi-Ended Calls + +In IN CS-1, a service logic instance in an SCF can control only one "half-call" part of a call in an SSF/CCF. This "single-ended service feature" principle is extended in IN CS-2 so that a service logic instance can also control associated "half-calls" or a multi-party "half-call". In any case, only a single controlling party is involved in the IN control. This extension is made for supporting Call Party Handling function described in 7.1.4. (Refer to 4.2/Q.1219 for illustrative examples of Single-Ended Service Feature and also Single Point of Control concepts. The last part of 4.3.1/Q.1224 describes the IN CS-2 extension.) + +### 7.1.3 Mid-Call Interruption + +Mid-Call interruption is the functionality to allow the existing Mid-Call TDPs to function beyond the case in IN CS-1, enabling a user to invoke an IN service or service feature during the active phase of a call. IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized in the following: + +#### GFP specification items + +- BCP SIB has enhanced POIs (Points of Initiation) and PORs (Points of Return) according to the IN CS-2 requirement to allow more interaction between the basic call and the service logic. "Call Interrupted" POI is enhanced for Mid-Call Interruption. (Refer to 6.1.2.1/Q.1223). + +#### DFP specification items + +- The following five trigger types are identified for mid-call interruption: + - O\_Switched\_Hook\_Flash\_Immediate; + - O\_Switched\_Hook\_Flash\_Specific\_Code; + - T\_Switched\_Hook\_Flash\_Immediate; + - T\_Switched\_Hook\_Flash\_Specific\_Code; + - BRI\_Feature\_Activation\_Indicator. + +The first four trigger types are for switch-hook flash and the last one is for feature activation indication. + +- When a TDP is met and its trigger type is one of trigger types listed above, SSF/CCF is requested to process this TDP appropriately to send an SCF necessary information with O\_MidCall or T\_MidCall information flow (refer to 4.2.7/Q.1224). + +The requested process to SSF/CCF includes the following: + +- Switch-based non-IN call control function is required to hold a passive party during mid-call interruption, and to offer dial tone to the controlling party and collect digits from the controlling party. A passive party denotes here a party not requesting the mid-call interruption and a controlling party denotes a party requesting the mid-call interruption (refer to 7.1.4 and to 4.3.2.1/Q.1224). +- SSF/CCF must be able to interpret the digits provided by the controlling party to determine how the successive call processing is treated (e.g. IN is involved or not, which service feature is required, etc.) (refer to 4.3.2.1/Q.1224). +- Component, Component Correlation ID and Component Type information elements are added to the list of information elements for O\_MidCall and T\_MidCall information flows in order to provide an SCF with information received from the controlling party (refer to 12.4.3.45, 12.4.3.71, 12.4.4.33, 12.4.4.34 and 12.4.4.35/Q.1224). + +#### Protocol specification items + +- Component, componentCorrelationID and componentType optional parameters are added to the "MidCallArg" (refer to 5.1/Q.1228). +- In IN CS-2, SCF Call State Model (SCSM) in terms of SSF and SRF interface (SCSM-SSF/SRF) contains various kinds of FSMs (refer to 12.5.1/Q.1228). "FSM for CS", one of these FSMs, is considered to allow receiving MidCall EDPs in any state in it (refer to 12.5.1.3/Q.1228). + +### 7.1.4 Call Party Handling + +Call Party Handling is the ability to manage various parties participation in a call. IN CS-2 call modelling/processing aspect is enhanced so as to allow parties bearer channels to be added, deleted, joined and/or separated from the other parties involved in the call. IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized as in the following: + +#### GFP specification items + +- JOIN and SPLIT SIBs are newly defined in IN CS-2 for CPH. JOIN, SPLIT and BCP SIBs are used within the context of CPH in the GFP (refer to 5.8, 5.15 and 6.1/Q.1223). + +#### DFP specification items + +- The object-oriented technique is used to describe IN Switching State Model (IN-SSM), where the key concept is Connection View State (CVS). CVS represents the state of basic calls and their related connections maintained by the SSF/CCF by using connection view objects such as Call Segment Association (CSA), Call Segment (CS), Legs, Connection Point (CP) and BCSM (refer to 4.3/Q.1224). + - **CSA:** provides an SCF with an abstract view of a single two-party or a multi-party call segment, or of a pair of associated call segments. The CSA represents the properties of a call segment or pair of associated call segments of interest to the SCF (e.g. the connectivity and call processing aspects) and describes these properties in terms of objects (i.e. virtual resources) that can be manipulated by the SCF. For connection control, these objects include legs and connection points. + - **CS:** represents a "half-call" part of a two-party call (either originating or terminating part) or a "half-call" part of a multi-party call. + - **CP:** represents a joint function between two legs, a conference function between three or more legs, replication function, merging function, or an information distribution + +function between two or more legs that specifies the directionality of information flow through the connection point (e.g. the connection point could receive information from multiple legs and distribute it to another leg). For IN CS-2, it interconnects legs supported by equivalent bearer services, and supports interworking between circuit mode/speech and circuit mode/3.1 kHz audio bearer services. + +- **Leg:** is typed as either a "controlling leg" or a "passive leg". A controlling leg represents the local access interface at a local exchange or the remote access interface at transit exchange (e.g. the incoming line or trunk in an originating call segment, or the outgoing line or trunk in a terminating call Segment). It is the leg for which IN service logic instances are invoked, either as a result of end-user signalling (e.g. a mid-call event) or on behalf of an end user. A passive leg represents a communication path which receives indications from the other side of the interface of the call, not the controlling side. "Leg status" such as "null", "pending", "joined", "shared" and "surrogate" are specified according to the status and context of the related call(s). +- The "CVS approach" is introduced to realize service features involving more than three parties, where the basic idea is controlling multiple basic calls and related connections in the SSF/CCF from the SCF (refer to 4.3.1/Q.1224 for IN-SSM and to 4.3.3/Q.1224 for the CVS approach). +- The "Hybrid approach", designed based on the CVS approach, is also introduced to realize more complicated services than those realized by the CVS approach. The hybrid approach uses bridging function at an SRF (refer to 4.3.4/Q.1224). +- IN Switching Manager (IN-SM) is required to enhance its capability for CPH . Four IN-SM core capabilities are identified for IN CS-2 CPH processing: + - capability for Mid-Call Interruption as shown in the previous subclause; + - capability to connect to a resource/transfer each call party; + - capability to present the current view of the half call and connection state to the SCF; and + - capability to combine selected transferred paths into a single call,(Refer to 4.3.2/Q.1224 for more detail about IN-SM core capabilities for CPH). +- As multiple BCSMs are involved in CPH processing, event detection/reporting rules concerning which BCSM is responsible for handling the event and how the event is notified, are necessary. Precedence rules among related BCSMs for the detection/reporting of events signalled on the controlling leg are specified (refer to 4.3.3.6/Q.1224). +- Fourteen CVSs are identified for IN CS-2 CPH processing as shown in the following (refer to 4.3.3.7/Q.1224). Note that this set of CVSs does not contain every possible state represented by a combination of CV objects but is considered as a set of typical examples of such possible states: + - **Null:** represents a condition where call processing is not active. There is no controlling leg or passive leg connected to the connection point. + - **Originating Setup:** represents an originating two-party call in the set-up phase. + - **Stable 2-party:** represents a stable or clearing two-party call, and is either an originating or a terminating call from the perspective of the controlling user. + - **Terminating Setup:** represents a terminating two-party call in the set-up phase. + - **M-party Setup:** represents two associated call segments: one for an originating two-party call in the set-up phase and the other for either an originating or a terminating two-party call in the stable or clearing phase. The controlling user only has put one party on hold, and has originated a new call which has not yet reached the stable phase. Note + +that how the passive user can put one party on hold for some services in order to receive the request from the remote party side at the transit exchange is for further study. + +- **Call on Hold:** represents two associated call segments: one for a two-party call in the stable or clearing phase and the other for either an originating or a terminating two-party call in the stable or clearing phase. The controlling user only has put one party on hold, and is participating in another call which is in the stable or clearing phase. Note that how the passive user can put one party on hold for some services in order to receive the request from the remote party side at the transit exchange is for further study. +- **Call Waiting:** represents two associated call segments: one for a two-party call in the terminating set-up phase in call waiting and the other for either an originating or a terminating two-party call in the stable or clearing phase. The controlling user is participating in a call that is in the stable or clearing phase, and another call is terminating to the controlling user. +- **Stable M-Party:** represents a stable or clearing multi-party call in one call segment. +- **Transfer:** represents a transferred call. CS in this CVS contains a controlling leg in "Surrogate" status and two passive legs in "Joined" status. The call between the two passive legs is in the stable or clearing phase. Note that the "surrogate" legStatus for the controlling leg indicates the charging relationship between the two passive legs after the call has been transferred. +- **Forward:** represents a forwarded call. Call processing for the first passive leg is in a stable or clearing phase, or a terminating call set-up phase, whereas call processing for the second passive leg is in an originating call set-up phase. +- **Originating Setup M-Party:** represents two associated call segments, both for originating two-party call in the set-up phase. The controlling user is in the set-up phase (e.g. connected to an SRF for bridging and the SRF has originated a new call which has not yet reached the stable state). +- **Active M-Party:** represents two associated call segments: one for an originating two-party call in the set-up phase and the other for an originating two-party call in the stable phase. +- **1-Party Setup:** represents a 1-party call being originated on behalf of the network (i.e. the controlling leg has a legStatus = surrogate). +- **Stable 1-Party:** represents a 1-party call originated on behalf of the network (i.e. the controlling leg has a legStatus = surrogate) that is in a stable or clearing phase. + +- Fourteen information flows (IFs) from an SCF to an SSF shown in the following are identified for IN CS-2 CPH processing. Seven of these IFs are newly introduced in IN CS-2, and are summarized in Table 7-1. These information flows cause CVS transitions as described in 4.3.3.7/Q.1224. + +- AnalyseInformation; +- CollectInformation; +- CreateCallSegmentAssociation; +- CreateCallSegmentAssociationResult; +- Connect; +- DisconnectLeg; +- InitiateCallAttempt; +- MergeCallSegments; +- MoveLeg; +- MoveCallSegments; + +- Reconnect; +- ReleaseCall; +- SplitLeg; +- SelectRoute. + +The hybrid approach does not require all of CVs and IFs shown above and uses a subset of them (refer to 4.3.4.3/Q.1224). + +**Table 7-1/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for CPH (from SCF to SSF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Create Call Segment Association
(12.4.3.22/Q.1224)
<17.37/Q.1228> | Call ID (M) | This IF is used to create a new CSA. The new CSA will not contain any Call Segments after creation. The SSF is responsible for specifying unique CSA identifier for the created CSA. | +| Create Call Segment Association Result
(12.4.3.23/Q.1224) | New Call Segment Association (M) | This IF is used to report the new CSA ID to the SCF.

At the operation level, The Return Result of CreateCallSegmentAssociation operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Disconnect Leg
(12.4.3.27/Q.1224)
<17.41/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
Release Cause (O) | This IF is used to release a specific leg associated with the call and retain any other legs not specified in the Disconnect_Leg IF. | +| Merge Call Segments
(12.4.3.38/Q.1224)
<17.62/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Source Call Segment (M),
Target Call Segment (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to merge two associated CSs with a single controlling leg into one CS with that controlling leg. The net effect of the Merge Call Segment message is to create a communication among the controlling leg and both passive legs, with each party being able to communicate with both other parties. | +| Move Call Segments
(12.4.3.39/Q.1224)
<17.64/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Legs (M),
New Call Segment (M),
Source Call Segment Association (M),
Target Call Segment Association (M) | This IF is used to move a Call Segment from the source Call Segment Association to the target Call Segment Association. This IF ends the association between the moved Call Segment and any Call Segments remaining in the source Call Segment Association. | +| Move Leg
(12.4.3.40/Q.1224)
<17.65/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
Target Call Segment (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to move the leg from one CS to another CS with which it is associated. The net effect of the Move Leg message is to interrupt the current communication of the controlling leg, without clearing the passive leg on that communication, and to establish communication for the controlling leg with the other passive leg. | + +**Table 7-1/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for CPH (from SCF to SSF) (concluded)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Reconnect
(12.4.3.50/Q.1224)
<17.82/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Alerting Pattern (O),
Display Information (O),
Notification Duration (O) | This IF is used to re-establish communication between the controlling leg and the (held) passive leg(s) of a call with two or more parties, when the controlling leg has disconnected. In particular, this IF requests that BCSM processing set the reconnect timer to the value specified by the Notification Duration IE, and provide the requested Alerting Pattern and/or Display Information to the controlling leg. | +| Split Leg
(12.4.3.66/Q.1224)
<17.117/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
New Call Segment (M) | This IF is used to separate one party from its Call Segment and, in case of a multi-party CS, place it in a new associated CS. It interrupts the speech connection between the leg to be split and the legs remaining in the original Call Segment. The IF is the inverse of the Merge Call Segments IF. | +|

NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.

NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.

NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF.

| | | + +- For the IFs from SSF to SCF, no new IFs for CPH are specified in IN CS-2. Created Call Segment Association ID Information Element (IE) is defined in order that the SCF can identify a CSA instance in the SSF under the SCF control. This IE is used with DP specific IFs, Initial DP IF and Event Report BCSM (refer to 12.4.4.41/Q.1224). + +#### Protocol specification items + +- In IN CS-2, an SSF-FSM instance is classified into one of the following FSMs: "IN-SSM FSM", "Assisting SSF FSM" and "Handed-off SSF FSM". IN-SSM FSM consists of two different FSMs: FSM for CSA and FSM for CS. FSM for CSA creates one or more FSMs for CS synchronized with the CS creation during the CPH processing (refer to 11.3/Q.1228). +- General rules and procedure principles for SSF FSMs in terms of CPH is described in the beginning of 11.5/Q.1228. +- Consideration on SSF/CCF processing for the case it receives "reconnect" operation is shown in 7.2.2.2.2. +- In IN CS-2, SCF Call State Model (SCSM) in terms of SSF and SRF interface contains various kinds of FSMs (refer to 12.5.1/Q.1228). "FSM for CSA" and "FSM for CS" reflect the CPH processing impacts in their state transition (refer to 12.5.1.2 and 12.5.1.3/Q.1228). +- Twelve Call Segment (CS) states represented by a specific combination of Connection View (CV) objects and transitions between these states are specified for IN CS-2 in order to provide strict procedure descriptions of the SSF when CPH related activities take place (refer to A.2 and A.4/Q.1228). + +### 7.1.5 Enhanced SRF + +The SRF is enhanced to be able to execute a kind of SRF service logic named "User Interaction-Scripts (UI-scripts)" in order to reduce the number of messages for a series of user interaction procedures (e.g. a procedure for User Authentication) (refer to 3.4.5 and 3.4.6/Q.1224). In addition to that, new types of specialized resources which the SRF controls are added to the existent IN CS-1 specialized resources (these are listed in the following). IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized as in the following: + +#### GFP specification items + +- USER INTERACTION SIB is enhanced to handle UI-scripts. SIB operations of this SIB, "User Interaction RUN", "User Interaction Information" and "User Interaction Close" are defined for this purpose (5.18/Q.1223). + +#### DFP specification items + +- SRF internal functional architecture is largely enhanced so as to handle the UI-scripts (refer to clause 5/Q.1224). + +An SRF component RCP (Resource Control Part) is defined for this new capability. RCP has the following functions: + +- **Resource management:** This function is performed by a sub-component "SRF Resource Manager (RM)". The RM allocates an appropriate resource, controls the resource and maintains its status. This function is already identified in IN CS-1. +- **User Interaction Script execution:** This function is performed by sub-components "User Interaction Scripts (UI-Scripts)", "Transaction Module", "Resource Logic Library" and "Resource Logic Instances". An SCF only requests the execution of a UI-Script to the SRF. Inside the SRF, these sub-components perform a series of user interaction procedure defined by the specified UI-Script on behalf of the SCF and the SRF returns its result to the SCF. +- New types of specialized resources are supported by the IN CS-2 SRF. These are "Automatic Speech Recognition resource", "Text-to-Speech resource" and "Message Sender/Receiver resource" (refer to 3.3.6 and 5.3/Q.1224). +- The SRF-SCF relationship is enhanced so as to support the enhanced SRF capability. As already described above, the SCF does not have to send an operation to the SRF for every user interaction. +The SRF-SMF relationship is used for the management of the SRF resources. +- Information Flows and Information Elements newly defined for the enhanced SRF capability in IN CS-2 are listed in Tables 7-2 and 7-3: + +**Table 7-2/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for Enhanced SRF (from SCF to SRF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Prompt and Receive Message
(12.5.2.9/Q.1224)
<17.80/Q.1228> | Disconnection From IP Forbidden (M),
SRF Connect ID (M),
Call Segment (O),
Information To Record (O),
Information To Send (O),
Mailbox ID (O),
Media (O),
Message Receiving Completion Condition (O),
Subscriber ID (O) | This IF is used to receive voice message from call party and record it in voice message sender/receiver. Some announcements are provided if necessary. | +| Script Close
(12.5.2.10/Q.1224)
<17.104/Q.1228> | User Interaction Script ID (M),
Call Segment (O),
User Interaction Script Specific Information (O) | This IF is issued by the SCF to deallocate the resources used to perform the instance of the "User Interaction" script: the context is released. | +| Script Information
(12.5.2.12/Q.1224)
<17.106/Q.1228> | User Interaction Script ID (M),
User Interaction Script Specific Information (M),
Call Segment (O) | This IF is issued by the SCF to send to the SRF additional information during the User Interaction script execution. | +| Script Run
(12.5.2.13/Q.1224)
<17.107/Q.1228> | User Interaction Script ID (M),
User Interaction Script Specific Information (M),
Call Segment (O),
Disconnect From IP Forbidden (O) | This IF is issued by the SCF to allocate the necessary resources to perform the instance of the "User Interaction" script and then to activate this "User Interaction" script instance. A context is partially defined for it if necessary.) | +|

NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.

NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference in Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the operation is provided in brackets in the first column.

NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF.

| | | + +**Table 7-3/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for Enhanced SRF (from SRF to SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Message Received
(12.5.2.6/Q.1224) | Received Message ID (M),
Received Status (M),
SRF Connect ID (M),
Received Message Length (O) | This IF is used for confirmation by SCF that the message is received by SRF completely.

At the operation level, The Return Result of PromptAnd ReceiveMessage operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Script Event
(12.5.2.11/Q.1224)
<17.105/Q.1228> | User Interaction Script ID (M),
User Interaction Script Result Information (M),
Call Segment (O) | This IF is issued by the SRF to return information to the SCF on the results of the execution of the instance of User Interaction script. This result might be the partial result during the user interaction execution script or the final result of the user interaction script. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.
NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. | | | + +#### Protocol specification items + +- State transitions of SRF call State Model (SRSM) according to UI script processing are specified in addition to the existent IN CS-1 transition (refer to 13.4/Q.1228). +- In IN CS-2, SCF Call State Model (SCSM) consists of various kinds of sub FSMs. "FSM for SSF/SRF interface" and "FSM for Specialized Resource" reflect the Enhanced SRF related processing as well as existing CS-1 SRF processing (refer to 12.5.1.3 and 12.5.1.4/Q.1228). + +### 7.1.6 Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction (OCUUI) + +"Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction (OCUUI)" IN CS-2 key function enables a service logic instance in the SCF to communicate with a user outside the context of a call (e.g. a service logic in the SCF communicates with a user who sends/receives information over out-channel signalling interface using the Q.932 protocol when no basic call processing is involved). OCUUI is required for services/service features such as terminal registration, out-channel based UPT location registration and message waiting indication, etc. For this capability, functional elements and service processing mechanism different from those for call related user interaction are specified. IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized in the following: + +#### GFP specification items + +- In the GFP, BCUP (Basic Call Unrelated Process) specialized SIB is newly introduced for the basic call unrelated processing and description for the USER INTERACTION SIB is enhanced for the SCF-User communication without the context of the call. "User Interaction Session Open", "User Interaction Session Close", "User Interaction Play" and "User Interaction Play and Collect" which are parts of USER INTERACTION SIB operations are used for OCUUI as well as call related user interaction (refer to 5.18/Q.1223 for USER INTERACTION SIB, and to 6.2/Q.1223 for BCUP specialized SIB). + +#### DFP specification items + +- In the IN CS-2 DFP, new FEs named "Call Unrelated Service Function" (CUSF) and "Service Control User Agent Function" (SCUAF) and the basic call unrelated processing model are defined to realize OCUUI function. +- The CUSF is a functional entity which performs call unrelated processing for the communication between a user and a service logic without a context of a call. It provides functions of: + - association handling between the SCUAF; + - detection of some events/triggers of call unrelated processing and reporting them to the SCF; + - modification of call unrelated processing according to the SCF operations; and + - support of out-channel user interaction.(Refer to 3.3.8/Q.1224). +- The SCUAF is one of user agent functions and it enables a user to access CUSF over a signalling interface. The relationship between the CUSF and the SCUAF is not the subject of IN standardization activities (refer to 7.1/Q.1221 and 3.3.9/Q.1224). +- The CUSF maintains the "Basic Call Unrelated State Model (BCUSM)" which models some aspects of the basic call unrelated processing in the CUSF such as association setup/release over the signalling channel or ROSE APDU reception but does not model the processing depending on the contents of APDU. The BCUSM is expressed as a combination of Points In Activation (PIAs) and Detection Points (DPs), where a PIA indicates association handling status and a DP indicates an event for association setup/release request or detection of a ROSE APDU reception. IN CS-2 BCUSM has three DPs and three PIAs, and three DP criteria are identified. The BCUSM defined in Recommendation Q.1224 is not a general state model of the basic call unrelated processing. The BCUSM may be enhanced or modified in future Capability Sets. +- The basic idea of BCUSM and service control mechanism for OCUUI is similar to the BCSM and the call related service control mechanism. The BCUSM hides the detail of call unrelated processing in the CUSF and is used for the detection of some triggers and events during the call unrelated processing and then the CUSF reports them to the SCF. In response to the DP notification from the CUSF, the service logic in the SCF sends back the operations to influence the call unrelated processing at the CUSF. +- The internal functional structure of the CUSF is similar to the SSF/CCF functional structure (refer to 8.1/Q.1224). +- There is some implication concerning relationships between the CUSF and the SSF/CCF but these relationships are not the subject of IN CS-2 specifications (refer to 8.3/Q.1224). +- Information Flows, Information Elements and corresponding operations newly defined for this function in IN CS-2 are listed in Tables 7-4 and 7-5 (refer to 12.7/Q.1224). + +**Table 7-4/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for OCUUI (from CUSF to SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Activation Received And Authorized
(12.7.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.2/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Service Address Information (M),
Terminal Type (M),
Calling Party Number (O),
Component (O),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Component Type (O),
Location Number (O) | This IF is issued by the CUSF for reporting the TDP event to the SCF that an association request (optionally with a request of an invocation of operation) has been received, and criteria for the Activation Received and Authorized DP were met. | +| Activity Test Response
(12.7.2.3/Q.1224) | Call ID (M) | This IF is the response to the Activity Test For CUSF IF.

At the operation level, The Return Result of ActivityTest operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Association Release Requested
(12.7.2.4/Q.1224)
<17.10/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Service Address Information (M),
Terminal Type (M),
Calling Party Number (O),
Component (O),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Component Type (O),
Location Number (O) | This IF is issued by the CUSF for reporting the TDP/EDP event to the SCF that a request of association release with optionally an operation invocation request or an response/error has been received, and criteria for the Association release Requested DP were met. | +| Component Received
(12.7.2.5/Q.1224)
<17.29/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Service Address Information (M),
Terminal Type (M),
Component Correlation ID (M),
Component (O),
Component Type (O),
Calling Party Number (O),
Location Number (O) | This IF is issued by the CUSF for reporting the TDP/EDP event to the SCF that an operation invocation request or an response/error has been received, and criteria for the Component Received DP were met. | +|

NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.

NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.

NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF.

| | | + +**Table 7-5/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for OCUUI (from SCF to CUSF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Activity Test
(12.7.2.2/Q.1224)
<17.3/Q.1228> | Call ID (M) | This IF is used to check for the continued existence of a relationship between the SCF and CUSF. If the relationship is still in existence, then the CUSF will respond with Activity Test For CUSF Response. If no reply is received, then the SCF will assume that the CUSF has failed in some way and will take the appropriate action. | +| Initiate Association
(12.7.2.6/Q.1224)
<17.59/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Called Party Number (M) | This information flow is used to allow the SCF to initiate a call unrelated association with the user. | +| Release Association
(12.7.2.8/Q.1224)
<17.83/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Cause (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF for requesting the CUSF to release the logical connection. | +| Request Report BCUSM Event
(12.7.2.7/Q.1224)
<17.94/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
BCUSM Event List (M),
Component Type (M),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Monitor Duration (O) | This IF is issued by the SCF for requesting the CUSF to report an EDP event to the SCF. The EDP event may be selectively reported by the CUSF with criteria for the DPs specified by this information flow, such as invoke, return result, etc., but this capability is optional. | +| Send Component
(12.7.2.9/Q.1224)
<17.112/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Component Correlation ID (M),
Message (M),
Component (O),
Monitor Duration (O),
Component Type (O),
Location Number (O) | This IF is issued by the SCF for requesting the CUSF to send a specified component to the SCUAF with a specified message. If the invocation from a network side takes place, the CUSF establishes a logical connection for a user with Called Party Number. | + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. + +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. + +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +#### Protocol specification items + +- The CUSF can be located at the local exchange level only in IN CS-2 (not at the transit exchange level). +- The CUSF supports only connection-oriented communication between a user and the network; connection-less communication is out of the scope of IN CS-2. +- The CUSF can be located at a node other than the SSP (e.g. SN). A new physical node named "Call Unrelated Service Point (CUSP)" is introduced in IN CS-2. The CUSP contains the CUSF and the CCF (refer to clauses 3 and 5/Q.1225). + +- At the high level, CUSF internal structure for protocol processing and the CUSF Finite State Model (CUSF FSM) are specified for the IN CS-2 OCUUI implementation (refer to clause 15/Q.1228). + +### **7.1.7 Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction (OCCRUI)** + +"Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction (OCCRUI)" provides the IN CS-2 compliant network the ability to transmit information between a user and a service logic instance within the context of a call on the out-channel signalling access. IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized in the following: + +#### **GFP specification items** + +- In the GFP, description for the USER INTERACTION SIB is enhanced for the Service logic/User communication within the context of the call using out-channel signalling. "User Interaction Session Open", "User Interaction Session Close", "User Interaction Play" and "User Interaction Play and Collect", which are parts of USER INTERACTION SIB operations, are used for OCCRUI as well as OCUUI (refer to 5.18/Q.1223). + +#### **DFP specification items** + +- SSF/CCF must realize signalling interworking between basic call signalling and INAP for OCCRUI processing (e.g. interworking between DSS1 functional protocol and INAP or interworking between ISUP and INAP) to transmit necessary information between a service logic and an ISDN user. This signalling interworking function for the OCCRUI capability can be located at a local exchange level or at a transit exchange level. +- The USI information element is introduced to carry information from an ISDN user to a service logic instance and from a service logic instance to an ISDN user. The SSF/CCF only transmits this IE transparently and does not touch the contents (refer to 4.2.9/Q.1224). +- A mechanism is specified (refer to 4.2.9/Q.1224) so that an SSF/CCF identifies the appropriate receiver of the information from an SCF/an ISDN user. +- Information Flows, Information Elements and corresponding operations newly defined for this function in IN CS-2 are listed in Tables 7-6 and 7-7 (refer to 12.4/Q.1224). + +**Table 7-6/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for OCCRUI (from SSF to SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Event Report Facility
(12.4.3.32/Q.1224)
<17.50/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Component (O),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Component Type (O),
Leg ID (O) | This IF is issued by the SSF to report to the SCF that FACILITY IE received within appropriate DSS1 message. This flow is issued by SSF during the BCSM suspended at a Detection Point, when the SCF previously requested the event with the Request Report Facility Event IF. | +| Report UTSI
(12.4.3.52/Q.1224)
<17.87/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
USI Information (M),
USI Service Indicator (M) | This IF is the response to the Request Report UTSI IF, when the monitoring has been previously requested. This IF is sent if a User to Service Information (UTSI) IE was received and the UTSI IE meets the conditions which were requested by the Request Report UTSI IF before. | + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +**Table 7-7/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for OCCRUI (from SCF to SSF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Request Report Facility Event
(12.4.3.55/Q.1224)
<17.95/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Component Type (O),
Leg ID (O),
Monitor Duration (O) | This flow is issued by SCF for requesting SSF to report the event of FACILITY IE reception to SCF. | +| Request Report UTSI
(12.4.3.56/Q.1224)
<17.96/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
USI Monitor Mode (M),
USI Service Indicator (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to request the SSF to monitor for a User to Service Information (UTSI) information element. A notification is sent back to the SCF when the UTSI IE is detected by the SSF. | +| Send Facility Information
(12.4.3.63/Q.1224)
<17.113/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Call Processing Correlation ID (O),
Component (O),
Component Correlation ID (O),
Component Type (O),
Leg ID (O) | This flow is issued by SCF for requesting SSF to send FACILITY IE to call party. It should also support FACILITY IE delivery within call establishing messages or Facility message. | + +**Table 7-7/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for OCCRUI (from SCF to SSF) (concluded)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Send STUI
(12.4.3.64/Q.1224)
<17.114/Q.1228> | Call ID (M),
Leg ID (M),
USI Information (M),
USI Service Indicator (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to send a Service to User Information (STUI) information element to an user. | +|

NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.

NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.

NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF.

| | | + +#### Protocol specification items + +- The application entity procedure for the SSF is enhanced to include the OCCRUI FSM (Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction FSM) for this network aspect (refer to 11.8/Q.1228). + +### 7.1.8 Service/Feature Interaction (Service Processing) + +In the IN CS-2 time frame, only IN and non-IN service interaction is considered through all the planes of INCM. Regarding the service interaction between IN services is considered up to the DFP level (protocol specification will be considered in future capability sets). + +#### GFP specification items + +- Nothing identified. + +#### DFP specification items + +- The following three types of feature interaction are within the scope of IN CS-2 (2.11/Q.1224): + - Case A: IN based to switch based: ServiceInteractionIndicator mechanism is used so that an IN service logic can allow/deny or modify switch-based service logic execution via call related signalling. + - Case B: switch based to IN based: This case may be treated in the same way as Case C. + - Case C: IN based to IN based: Two different approaches are identified. The first approach is based on the ServiceCompatibilityIndication parameter which is used during the triggering phase at the SSF to check the compatibility between two service logics. The compatibility checks can allow the triggering of a second TDP-R while there already exists an SSF-SCF control relationship. The second approach is based on the exchange of information between the two involved SCFs, but this approach is not specified in IN CS-2 and will be provided in IN CS-3 or later IN capability sets. + +#### Protocol specification items + +- Apart from their role during the triggering process in the SSF, the INServiceCompatibilityIndication and INServiceCompatibilityResponse parameters can be simply used to convey the list of services/service features subsequently invoked in the call. +- Feature Interaction may have to be managed between Single Point of Control services in a single SSF and between multiple SSFs, where as processing of the DP rules independently + +ensures single point of control within many single call segments. Within a single SSF this may be achieved by static management procedures as in IN CS-1. + +- Definition of the interaction between more than one SCFs for Feature Interaction Management is outside the scope of IN CS-2. Interaction between SSFs for Feature Interaction Management is included in IN CS-2 for those cases possible by ISUP parameter negotiation. + +### 7.1.9 Internetworking between IN structured networks + +This is one of the major functional requirements studied for IN CS-2. This function requires an extension of interfaces between FEs physically located in different networks so that these networks can cooperate together to provide a service (i.e. new information flows and information elements in IN DFP are required). Three relationships, SCF-SCF, SCF-SDF and SDF-SDF, are identified for internetworking in IN CS-2. IN CS-2 specifications supporting this function are summarized in the following: + +#### GFP specification items + +- For the SCF-SCF relationship, INITIATE SERVICE PROCESS SIB, END SIB and MESSAGE HANDLER SIB are introduced to handle parallel service processing. SIB operations of these SIBs, "Initiate Service Process", "End", "Send Message" and "Receive Message" are defined for this purpose (refer to 5.6, 5.7 and 5.10/Q.1223). +- AUTHENTICATE, LOG CALL INFORMATION, SCREEN, SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT and TRANSLATE SIBs are enhanced to cover not only SCF-SDF relationship but also SDF-SDF relationship (refer to 5.2, 5.9, 5.12, 5.13 and 5.17/ Q.1223). + +#### DFP specification items + +- In IN CS-2, SCF-SCF relationship supports call related internetworking and SCF-SDF and SDF-SDF relationships support both call related and call unrelated-related internetworking. The latter case may be mostly used for terminal or personal mobility services/service features such as registration, authentication encryption and handover procedures. These relationships can be applied for both intranetworking case and internetworking case (refer to 3.4/Q.1224). + +##### SCF-SCF relationship + +- SCF-SCF relationship is used when a service logic instance in one SCF requires interactions with a service logic instance in another SCF (i.e. distribution of service logic). This means that the first SCF (controlling SCF) asks the second SCF (supporting SCF) to perform some action and the result of the action is returned to the first SCF. In another words, these service logic instances cooperate together in order to perform a required service (e.g. Customized Call Routing service). This is achieved by coordination, synchronization and security mechanisms embedded in the SCFs (refer to 3.4.2/Q.1224). +- Internetworking manager functional component is introduced to the SCF in order to support internetworking (refer to 6.2.2.5/Q.1224). +- Chaining and referral mechanisms are supported for the SCF-SCF relationship. The former is used for the case where the supporting SCF can not handle the request and transfer the request to the other SCF. The latter is used for the case where the supporting SCF can not handle the request and return to the controlling SCF an address information of an alternative SCF to which the request should be forwarded. +- Information Flows, Information Elements and corresponding operations defined for SCF-SCF relationship are listed in Tables 7-8 and 7-9 (refer to 12.6/Q.1224). Stage 2 descriptions of INITIATE SERVICE PROCESS and MESSAGE HANDLER SIBs will be helpful to understand relations among those information flows (refer to 11.2.7/Q.1224 and + +11.2.10/Q.1224 respectively). Note that these IFs/IEs are not only for the internetworking but also for the intranetworking. + +- For the SCF-SCF relationship, the same information flows and information elements as in the normal interworking case are used for the chaining case. + +**Table 7-8/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks (from the controlling SCF to the supporting SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Activity Test
(12.6.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.3/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M) | This IF is used to check for the continued existence of a relationship between the controlling SCF and the supporting SCF. If the relationship still needs to exist, then the SCF will respond with the Activity Test Result IF. If no reply is received, then the SCF issuing this IF will assume that the SCF has failed in some way and will take the appropriate action.

No distinction of controlling/supporting side regarding this IF. | +| Additional Information Result
(12.6.2.3/Q.1224) | Information (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF sends back additional information to the supporting SCF that has requested it in order to assist the controlling SCF. It can also send back an indication that a user interaction has failed and that the user information could not be collected from the user.

Result of ProvideUserInfo operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Confirmed Notification Provided
(12.6.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.30/Q.1228>,
<17.17/Q.1228> | Request Confirmation (M),
SCF Notification (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF informs the service logic in the supporting SCF of service processing related information from the controlling SCF. The conditions of notification can either be requested to the controlling SCF by the reception of a Request Notification IF from the supporting SCF or be pre-arranged as part of the agreement between the two SCFs.

The confirmation of this IF should be sent back using Notification Provided Confirmation IF.

The MAKE CONFIRM syntax is applied to the NotificationProvided operation.

Two operations, ConfirmedNotificationProvided and ChainedConfirmedNotificationProvided, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | + +**Table 7-8/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the controlling SCF to the supporting SCF) (continued)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Confirmed Report Charging Information (12.6.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.31/Q.1228>,
<17.30/Q.1228> | Calling Party Number (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
Request Confirmation (M),
Account Number (O),
Call Record (O),
Called Party Number (O),
Remaining User Credit (O),
Security Information (O),
Unique Call ID (O) |

This IF is issued by the controlling SCF to the supporting SCF to provide it with the charging-related information which will be used as the charge record for a call in the controlling SCF. This IF may either be the response to the previously received Establish Charging Record IF or can be sent without having received the Establish Charging Record IF, in the pre-arranged case. In any case a Handling Information Request has been sent.

The confirmation of this IF should be sent back using Report Charging Information Confirmation IF.

The MAKE CONFIRM syntax is applied to the ReportChargingInformation operation.

Two operations, ConfirmedReportChargingInformation and ChainedReportChargingInformation, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case).

| +| Handling Information Request (12.6.2.8/Q.1224)
<17.55/Q.1228>,
<17.19/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
Active Supplementary Services (O),
Bearer Capability (O),
Called Party Number (O),
Calling Party Number (O),
Calling Party Business Group ID (O),
Calling Party's Category (O),
Cause Of Last Call Failure (O),
Dialled Digits (O),
High Layer Compatibility (O)
Input Information (O),
Invoked Supplementary Services (O),
Location Number (O),
Number Of Call Attempts (O),
Original Called Party ID (O),
Redirecting Party ID (O),
Redirection Information (O),
Requested Type (O),
Security Information (O),
User Interaction Mode (O) |

This IF is issued by the controlling SCF for requesting a call processing information to the other SCF, or for requesting the other SCF to perform the predefined actions. The requested information is returned in a Handling Information Result IF. The presence of the parameters in the IF is dependent of the Service Logic type exchanged in the SCF Bind Request IF. This IF will not be sent empty.

Two operations, HandlingInformationRequest and ChainedHandlingInformationRequest, corresponds to this IF (for normal case and chaining case).

| + +**Table 7-8/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the controlling SCF to the supporting SCF) (continued)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Network Capability Result
(12.6.2.11/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Bearer Services (O),
Security Information (O),
Supplementary Services (O),
Teleservices (O) | This IF is a response to the Network Capability Request IF.
Result of NetworkCapability operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Notification Provided
(12.6.2.12/Q.1224)
<17.68/Q.1228>,
<17.22/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
SCF Notification (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF informs the service logic in the supporting SCF of service processing related information from the controlling SCF. The conditions of notification can either be requested to the controlling SCF by the reception of a Request Notification IF from the supporting SCF or be pre-arranged as part of the agreement between the two SCFs.
Two operations, NotificationProvided and ChainedNotificationProvided, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | +| Report Charging Information
(12.6.2.16/Q.1224)
<17.86/Q.1228>,
<17.23/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
Calling Party Number (M),
Account Number (O),
Call Record (O),
Called Party Number (O),
Remaining User Credit (O),
Security Information (O),
Unique Call ID (O) | This IF is issued to provide the charging-related information which will be used as the charge record for a call in the controlling SCF. This IF may either be the response to the previously received Establish Charging Record IF or can be sent without having received the Establish Charging Record IF, in the pre-arranged case. In either case a Handling Information Request has been sent.
There is no confirmation of this IF.
Two operations, ReportChargingInformation and ChainedReportChargingInformation, corresponds to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | +| SCF Bind Request
(12.6.2.18/Q.1224)
<17.100/Q.1228>,
<17.101/Q.1228> | Agreement ID (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
SCF Address (O),
Security Information (O) | This IF is used to establish relationship between two SCFs. This information flow is sent by a controlling SCF each time it needs to initiate communications with the supporting SCF and to ensure that the called entity has all facilities to operate on messages to be sent.
SCFBind operation is used for both normal and chaining cases. | + +**Table 7-8/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the controlling SCF to the supporting SCF) (concluded)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCF Unbind Request
(12.6.2.20/Q.1224)
<17.102/Q.1228>,
<17.103/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M) | This IF is used to request the termination of the active association with the supporting SCF. It can be sent only by the controlling SCF. SCFUnbind operation is used for both normal and chaining cases. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.
NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. | | | + +**Table 7-9/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the supporting SCF to the controlling SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Activity Test Result
(12.6.2.2/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M) | Result of activityTest operation corresponds to this IF.
No distinction of controlling/supporting side regarding this IF | +| Establish Charging Record
(12.6.2.6/Q.1224)
<17.46/Q.1228>,
<17.18/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
Charging Parameters (O),
Report Expected (O),
Security Information (O),
User Credit (O) | This IF is issued to give the controlling SCF charging related information needed for the call to proceed, e.g. charging rate information and maximum allowed credit. When the call instance is terminated, a response is returned to the supporting SCF.

This IF is a way to enable both SCFs to manage the charging information without pre-defined manner (this means the charging-related information will vary call by call even if the same service/service features are invoked in the controlling SCF.

Two operations, EstablishChargingRecord and ChainedEstablishChargingRecord, corresponds to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | + +**Table 7-9/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the supporting SCF to the controlling SCF) (continued)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Handling Information Referral
(12.6.2.7/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Handling Information IF in the case where the supporting SCF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the controlling SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another supporting SCF.

ERROR part of HandlingInformationRequest operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Handling Information Result
(12.6.2.9/Q.1224)
<17.56/Q.1228>,
<17.20/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
Calling Party Number (O),
Calling Party's Category (O),
Carrier (O),
High Layer Compatibility (O),
Language ID (O),
Original Called Party ID (O),
Output Information (O),
Redirecting Party ID (O),
Redirection Information (O),
Routing Address (O),
Security Information (O),
Supplementary Services (O) | The requested information using Handling Information Request IF is returned.

Two operations, HandlingInformationResult and ChainedHandlingInformationResult, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | +| Network Capability Request
(12.6.2.10/Q.1224)
<17.66/Q.1228>,
<17.21/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M),
Bearer Services (O),
Security Information (O),
Supplementary Services (O),
Teleservices (O) | This IF enables the supporting SCF to request the type of services that can be fulfilled by the controlling SCF, if not already specified by the agreement. It must be preceded by a Handling Information Request IF. The requested information is returned in the Network Capability Result. It gives the level of service that can be expected from the controlling SCF. This type of information can be used to build the response to the initial Handling Information Request.

Two operations, NetworkCapability and ChainedNetworkCapability, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | + +**Table 7-9/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the supporting SCF to the controlling SCF) (continued)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Notification Provided Confirmation
(12.6.2.13/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF is issued to confirm the Confirmed Notification Provided IF reception.

Result of ConfirmedNotificationProvided operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Provide User Information
(12.6.2.14/Q.1224)
<17.81/Q.1228>,
<17.24/Q.1228> | Constraints (M),
Information To Send (M),
Number Of Allowed Retries (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
Type Of Requested Info (M),
Actions (O),
Error Info (O),
Language ID (O),
Security Information (O) | This IF is used by the supporting SCF to request additional information from the controlling SCF. This IF is initiated when the supporting SCF receives a Handling Information Request IF from the controlling SCF and it detects that additional information is needed from the calling user/controlling SCF in order for the call to proceed. The controlling SCF returns the information to the supporting SCF by the Additional Information Result IF. The supporting SCF may invoke multiple Provide User Information IFs.

Two operations, ProvideUserInformation and ChainedProvideUserInformation, corresponds to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | +| Report Charging Information Confirmation
(12.6.2.16/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF is issued to confirm the Confirmed Report Charging Information IF reception.

Result of ConfirmedReportChargingInformation operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Request Notification
(12.6.2.17/Q.1224)
<17.91/Q.1228>,
<17.25/Q.1228> | Requested Notifications (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O) | This IF is issued to request notifications of the service processing related information from the controlling SCF.

Two operations, RequestNotification and ChainedRequestNotification, correspond to this IF (for normal case and chaining case). | + +**Table 7-9/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks +(from the supporting SCF to the controlling SCF) (concluded)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCF Bind Result
(12.6.2.19/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O),
Supporting SCF Address (O) | This IF is used by the supporting SCF to respond to the request for an association from the controlling SCF. Before the supporting SCF sends the positive SCF Bind Result, it shall not accept any other messages from the controlling side for this association. Neither shall it send any messages for this association to the controlling SCF other than SCF Bind Result.

Result of SCFBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.
NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. | | | + +##### **SCF-SDF relationship** + +- Referral mechanism is supported for the SCF-SDF relationship. +- Information Flows, Information Elements and corresponding operations newly defined for SCF-SDF relationship in IN CS-2 are listed in Tables 7-10 and 7-11 (see 12.8/Q.1224). Note that these IFs/IEs are not only for the internetworking but also for the intranetworking. +- IN CS-2 introduces generic security framework for secured access of a service user to a FE when internetworking activity is involved (refer to 7.1.11). End Authenticated Relationship information flow is introduced according to this framework in addition to the existing Authenticate and Authenticate Result information flows. +- "Execute" IF/operation is introduced for efficient access to data in the SDF from the SCF. The background of the introduction of this IF/operation is described in the context of "Entry Method" in 7.2.3.4. + +**Table 7-10/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks (from SCF to SDF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| End Authenticated Relationship
(12.8.2.6/Q.1224)
<17.38/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to end an authenticated relationship between the SCF and the SDF on behalf of the end user.
IN-directoryUnbind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Execute
(12.8.2.7/Q.1224)
<17.51/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Execute Identifier (M),
Object (M),
Specific Input Value (M),
Input Attributes (O) | This IF is used to request the SDF to perform the data access script associated with a particular item of data held in the DIT in the SDF. | + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +**Table 7-11/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks (from SDF to SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Execute Result
(12.8.2.9/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Specific Output Value (M),
Output Attributes (O) | This IF is the response to the Execute IF.
RESULT part of Execute operation corresponds to this IF | +| Add Entry Referral
(12.8.2.2/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Add Entry IF in the case where the SDF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another SDF.
ERROR part of the AddEntry operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Execute Referral
(12.8.2.8/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Execute IF in the case where the SDF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another SDF.
ERROR part of the Execute operation corresponds to this IF. | + +**Table 7-11/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks (from SDF to SCF) (concluded)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Modify Entry Referral
(12.8.2.11/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Modify Entry IF in the case where the SDF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another SDF.
ERROR part of the ModifyEntry operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Remove Entry Referral
(12.8.2.14/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Remove Entry IF in the case where the SDF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another SDF.
ERROR part of the RemoveEntry operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Search Referral
(12.8.2.17/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Referral Information (M) | This IF is the response to the Search IF in the case where the SDF does not contain the data involved in the request, and is used to provide the SCF with the information required to redirect the query to another SDF.
ERROR part of the Search operation corresponds to this IF. | + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. + +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. + +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +##### SDF-SDF relationship + +- The SDF in IN CS-2 provides data distribution transparency, data copy between different SDFs and security functionalities which are used when internetworking activity takes place (refer to 3.3/Q.1224). +- Copying the data through the SDF-SDF relationship is referred to as "Shadowing". The SDF which supplies copy data to the other SDF is referred to as the "supplier" and the SDF which receives copy data is referred to as the "consumer". Two different shadowing cases, "Supplier-initiated shadow updates" and "Consumer-initiated shadow updates" are described in 7.2.3.7. +- Chaining and referral mechanisms are supported for the SDF-SDF relationship. The former is used for the case where the requested SDF does not have the requested data and transfers the request to the other SDF; this mechanism enables data distribution transparency. The latter is used for the case where the requested SDF does not have the requested data and returns an address information of an alternative SDF to the requesting SDF for the redirection of the request. + +- Information Flows, Information Elements and corresponding operations defined for SDF-SDF relationship in IN CS-2 are listed in Table 7-12 (see 12.9/Q.1224). Note that these IFs/IEs are not only for the internetworking but also for the intranetworking. + +**Table 7-12/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between IN structured networks (from SDF to SDF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Authenticate
(12.9.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.42/Q.1228>,
<17.42/Q.1228> | Authentication Information (M),
Authorized Relationship ID (M) | DSABind and DSAShadowBind operations correspond to this IF (for normal case and shadowing case). | +| Authenticate Result
(12.9.2.2/Q.1224) | Authentication Information (M),
Authorized Relationship ID (M) | Results of DSABind and IN-DSAShadowBind operations correspond to this IF. | +| Chaining Request
(12.9.2.3/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Chained Argument (M),
Security Parameters (M) | Chained{OPERATION} a) corresponds to this IF. | +| Chaining Result
(12.9.2.4/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Chained Result (M),
Security Parameters (M) | Result of Chained{OPERATION} a) corresponds to this IF. | +| Copy Request
(12.9.2.5/Q.1224)
<17.36/Q.1228>,
<17.97/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Maintained Part (M),
Master (M),
Replication Area (M),
Update Mode (M),
Update Strategy (M) | CoordinateShadowUpdate and RequestShadowUpdate operations correspond to this IF b) . | +| Copy Result
(12.9.2.6/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Replicated Data (M) | Result of CoordinateShadowUpdate operation or Result of RequestShadowUpdate operation corresponds to this IF. | +| End Authenticated Relationship
(12.9.2.7/Q.1224)
<17.58/Q.1228>,
<17.43/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is issued by the SDF to end an authenticated relationship between two SDFs. IN-DSAUnbind and IN-DSAShadowUnbind correspond to this IF (for normal case and shadowing case). | +| Update Copy
(12.9.2.8/Q.1224)
<17.127/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Refreshed Information (M) | This IF is used to maintain a copy contained in the SDF to which a copy was originally provided because the selected update mode indicates that an update of the copy should be sent (e.g. modification of the copy in the responding network).
UpdateShadow operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Update Copy Result
(12.9.2.9/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M) | Result of UpdateShadow operation corresponds to this IF. | + +**Table 7-12/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for internetworking between +IN structured networks (from SDF to SDF) (concluded)** + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. + +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. + +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +a) Chained{OPERATION} is abbreviation for the list of the following operations: + +- ChainedAddEntry <17.17/Q.1228> +- ChainedExecute <17.19/Q.1228> +- ChainedModifyEntry <17.21/Q.1228> +- ChainedRemoveEntry <17.25/Q.1228> +- ChainedSearch <17.26/Q.1228> + +b) Sending the data from the supplier to the consumer is done by UpdateShadow operation. But before sending the data, one of the two procedures in the following must be preceded: + +- the consumer indicates the supplier request for copying (or updating) the shadow data; +- the supplier indicates the consumer shadowing agreement for which it intends to send updates. + +RequestShadowUpdate operation is used for the first case, sent from the consumer to the supplier ("Consumer initiated shadow updates" case). + +CoordinateShadowUpdate operation is used for the second case, sent from the supplier to the consumer ("Supplier initiated shadow updates" case). (refer to 17.36.1/Q.1228 and to 7.2.3.7). + +#### **Protocol specification items** + +- For the SCF-SDF and SDF-SDF relationships, a subset of X.500-series Recommendation, Directory Service protocol specifications are utilized in IN CS-2. Restrictions and assumptions on utilizing X.500 series are provided in clauses 7 and 8/Q.1228, for each relationship. +- In IN CS-2, SCF Call State Model (SCSM) has several kinds of sub-state-model for each relationship with interworking FE (refer to 12.3/Q.1228). + +SCSM-Sup (state transition model for the supporting SCF), SCSM-Con (state transition model for the controlling SCF), SCSM-ChI (state transition model for the chaining initiation SCF) and SCSM-ChT (state transition model for the chaining termination SCF) are defined for the SCF-SCF relationship (refer to 12.5.3/Q.1228). + +SCSM-SDF (state transition model for interworking with SDF) is defined for the SCF-SDF relationship (refer to 12.5.2/Q.1228). + +- In IN CS-2, SDF Call State Model (SDSM) has several kinds of sub-state-model for each relationship with interworking FE (refer to 14.3/Q.1228). + +SDSM-ShSSi (state transition model for the supplier SDF when shadowing is initiated by the supplier), SDSM-ShCSi (state transition model for the consumer SDF when shadowing is initiated by the supplier), SDSM-ShSCi (state transition model for the supplier SDF when shadowing is initiated by the consumer) and SDSM-ShCCi (state transition model for the consumer SDF when shadowing is initiated by the consumer) are defined for shadowing process on the SDF-SDF relationship (refer to 14.4.2.1/Q.1228). + +SDSM-ChI (state transition model for the chaining initiation SDF) and SDSM-ChT (state transition model for the chaining termination SDF) are defined for chaining process on the SDF-SDF relationship (refer to 14.4.2.2/Q.1228). + +SDSM-SCF (state transition model for SCF interworking) is defined for the SDF-SCF relationship (refer to 14.4.1/Q.1228). + +- Relations between SCF-SCF, SCF-SDF and SDF-SDF related protocol specifications and TC specifications are provided in 18.1.5, 18.1.6 and 18.1.7/Q.1228 respectively (e.g. mapping of some operations to TC dialogue primitives are provided). + +### **7.1.10 Internetworking with non-IN structured networks** + +#### **GFP specification items** + +- SCF-SCF interface related SIBs are applicable (refer to the previous subclause). + +#### **DFP specification items** + +- A new FE called IAF (Intelligent Access Function) residing in an entity of a non-IN structured network is identified for the communication with an SCF in an IN structured network (refer to 3.3.7/Q.1224). +- Two different relationships between the SCF and the IAF are necessary for two different cases from the security, charging and reliability requirements point of view (refer to 3.4.3/Q.1224). + - Case A: when the IAF belongs to another network; + - Case B: when the IAF belongs to a customer (e.g. private networks, PABXs and terminals, etc.). +- Information flows and information elements between the SCF and the IAF are same as those for SCF-SCF interface (refer to 12.6/Q.1224). + +#### **Protocol specification items** + +- INAP operations for SCF-IAF interface are same as those for SCF-SCF interface. + +### **7.1.11 Security** + +General requirements for secure systems are described in 7.2.10/Q.1221. Security aspects in the IN CS-2 scope is focused on the "Service User Authentication" which provides secure access by a user to the functions of a FE. This capability is specified for the internetworking relationship, i.e. SCF-SDF, SCF-SCF and SDF-SDF. + +#### **GFP specification items** + +- AUTHENTICATE SIB is enhanced for this function. This SIB is related to the SCF-SDF and SDF-SDF security function (refer to 5.2/Q.1223). +- INITIATE SERVICE PROCESS and END SIBs are related to the SCF-SCF security functions (refer to 5.6 and 5.7/Q.1223). + +#### **DFP specification items** + +- The high-level description of the "service user authentication" mechanism and generic security information flows including chaining and referral cases are specified in order to protect FEs from illegal access from an unauthorized user (refer to 11.1.6/Q.1224). +- SCF and SDF contain Security Manager functional component to realize security function (refer to 6.2.7 and 7.2.4/Q.1224). + +- Information Flows, Information elements and corresponding operations newly defined for this function in IN CS-2 are listed in Tables 7-13 to 7-16 (refer to 11.6.3, 12.6, 12.8 and 12.9/Q.1224). + +**Table 7-13/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for security (between two SCFs)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCF Bind Request
(12.6.2.18/Q.1224)
<17.100/Q.1228>,
<17.101/Q.1228> | Agreement ID (M),
Service Processing ID (M),
SCF Address (O),
Security Information (O) | This IF is used to establish relationship between two SCFs. This information flow is sent by a controlling SCF each time it needs to initiate communications with another (supporting) SCF and to ensure that the called entity has all facilities to operate on messages to be sent.

SCFBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| SCF Bind Result
(12.6.2.19/Q.1224) | Service Processing ID (M),
Security Information (O),
Supporting SCF Address (O) | This IF is used by the supporting SCF to respond to the request for an association from the controlling SCF.

It is mapped to the Return Result of the SCFBind operation. | +| SCF Unbind Request
(12.6.2.20/Q.1224)
<17.102/Q.1228>,
<17.103/Q.1228> | Service Processing ID (M) | This IF is used to request the termination of the active association with the supporting SCF. It can be sent only by the controlling SCF.

SCFUnbind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.
NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. | | | + +**Table 7-14/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for security (from SCF to SDF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Authenticate
(12.8.2.4/Q.1224) | Authentication Information (M),
Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is used to request the establishment of the authenticated relationship between the SCF and the SDF on behalf of the end user

DirectoryBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| End Authenticated Relationship
(12.8.2.6/Q.1224)
<17.38/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is issued by the SCF to end an authenticated relationship between the SCF and the SDF on behalf of the end user.

DirectoryUnbind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column.
NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. | | | + +**Table 7-15/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for security (from SDF to SCF)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Authenticate Result
(12.8.2.5/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Authentication Information (O) | This IF is used to confirm an establishment of an authenticated relationship between the SCF and the SDF on behalf of the end user.

The Return Result of the DirectoryBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF.
NOTE 2 – If the name of the operation is different from that of the IF, it is shown in the last column. | | | + +**Table 7-16/Q.1229 – New IFs/IEs for Security (between two SDFs)** + +| IF | IEs | Note | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Authenticate
(12.9.2.1/Q.1224)
<17.42/Q.1228> | Authentication Information (M),
Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is used to have identification and authentication of two SDFs involved in an SDF-SDF relationship. This IF is prior to any IF on the SDF-SDF interface. It is used to enforce access control policy between databases. DSABind or DSAShadowBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| Authenticate Result
(12.9.2.2/Q.1224) | Authorized Relationship ID (M),
Authentication Information (O) | This IF is used to confirm the result of authentication by the interacting SDF. The Return Result of the DSABind or DSAShadowBind operation corresponds to this IF. | +| End Authenticated Relationship
(12.8.2.6/Q.1224)
<17.43/Q.1228> | Authorized Relationship ID (M) | This IF is issued by the SDF to end an authenticated relationship between two SDFs. DSAUnbind and DSAShadowUnbind operations correspond to this IF. | + +NOTE 1 – The subclause number of Recommendation Q.1224 in the first column indicates the reference for the IF. +NOTE 2 – If an operation corresponding to the IF exists, reference to Recommendation Q.1228 for the detailed procedure of the corresponding operation is provided in brackets in the first column. +NOTE 3 – If there is no operation which has the same name as the IF, the last column shows how to map the IF to an IN CS-2 protocol element. If there is no such description in the last column, the name of the corresponding operation is the same as that of the IF. + +#### Protocol specification items + +- Subclause 18.1.5.3.6/Q.1228 provides how to use the TC dialogue handling services for establishing/releasing the authentication relationship between SCFs. +- Subclause 18.1.6.3.6/Q.1228 provides how to use the TC dialogue handling services for establishing/releasing the authentication relationship between SCF and SDF. +- Subclause 18.1.7.3.6/Q.1228 provides how to use the TC dialogue handling services for establishing/releasing the authentication relationship between two SDFs. +- Generic IN CS-2 security mechanisms for the interfaces identified above are provided in clause 19/Q.1228. Requirements for interface security, necessary procedures and definitions of FSMs for processing the security operations are described. Appendix III/Q.1228 indicates some examples of Simple Public Key GSS API Mechanism (SPKM) algorithms. + +### 7.1.12 Personal Mobility + +This mobility support requires an extension of the IN model and architecture to guarantee a correct handling of the user profile and service processing, independently from the user access. This function depends on other network functionalities, either already provided in IN CS-1, or provided in IN CS-2. + +### 7.1.13 Terminal Mobility + +This function is studied and specified so that a part of a mobile network (e.g. IMT-2000: International Mobile Telecommunications-2000) is structured based on the IN architecture. I.3.3.2/Q.1221 lists IN CS-2 target Terminal Mobility services/service features. DFP architecture is + +enhanced to support this function. Protocol specifications for this function are out of the scope of IN CS-2. + +#### **GFP specification items** + +No terminal mobility specific SIBs or GFP modelling elements are specified. SIBs and GFP modelling elements specified in Recommendation Q.1223 are used for this function. + +#### **DFP specification items** + +- New FEs shown in the following are introduced for the terminal mobility. + - CRACF (Call related Radio Access Control Function): realizes terminal mobility specific call/bearer control functions such as handover or paging. + - CURACF (Call Unrelated Radio Access Control Function): detects call unrelated events from a mobile terminal and notify it to an SCF. It also transfer information between a mobile terminal and the SCF. + - RCF (Radio Control Function): maintains radio and fixed bearer to establish and release a communication path between a mobile terminal and the network. + +CCF and CCAF are extended to support the terminal mobility function and they are denoted as CCF+ and CCAF+. + +- CCF+: is enhanced from the CCF in order to interwork with CCAF+, CRACF and CURACF. +- CCAF+: provides the user agent function to access CCF+, CRACF, CURACF and RCF. + +Definitions of these FEs and relationships identified for the terminal mobility are described in A.3/Q.1224. Example mapping scenarios of terminal mobility related FEs onto physical entities are provided in A.4/Q.1224. + +- Appendix II/Q.1224 provides informative descriptions about the frameworks of call related processing at the CRACF and non-call related processing at the CURACF and also provides IFs/IEs for the SCF-SSF/CCF, SCF-CRACF and SCF-CURACF relationships. + +### **7.1.14 IN-TMN** + +In IN CS-2, the Telecommunication Management Network (TMN) concept is introduced to define the framework for IN service and network management. Annex B/Q.1224 describes overview of the TMN concepts and provides some considerations on how the concepts are applied to the IN DFP architecture. The SMF functions could be mapped to more than one TMN layers. Examples of the mapping are shown in the Annex B/Q.1224. See also the next clause. + +### **7.1.15 Service Management** + +IN CS-2 Recommendations specify a framework of IN service management functional architecture. Subclause 7.2.12/Q.1221 provides the IN CS-2 target scope in terms of service management aspects and required functionalities. Subclause A.4/Q.1221 indicates IN CS-2 target Service Management services/service features. Protocol specifications for service management are out of the scope of IN CS-2. + +#### **GFP specification items** + +- Appendix I/Q.1223, includes informative texts of management aspects at GFP. It shows a consideration on GFP modelling for the management activities and gives the following elements: + - BSMP (Basic Service Management Process) is a specialized SIB which provides basic service management capability. + - Management Process is a combination of SIBs or HLSIBs which performs management activity. + +The approach for the modelling of management activities using these elements are similar to the approach for the modelling of the service processing activities using the Basic Call Process (BCP) and the Service Process. + +#### **DFP specification items** + +- Categories of IN CS-2 management functions of Service Management Function (SMF) are: + - Service Deployment functions; + - Service Provisioning functions; + - Service Operation Control functions; + - Billing functions; and + - Service Monitoring functions. + +(Refer to 3.3.10/Q.1224). + +Considerations on mapping of these IN management functions to TMN architecture are shown in B.4/Q.1224. + +- Relationships between the SMF and other FEs identified in IN CS-2 are: + - SMF-SCF; + - SMF-SDF; + - SMF-SSF/CCF; + - SMF-SRF; + - SMF-SMAF; + - SMF-SCEF; + - SMF-SMF; and + - SMF-CUSF. + +(Refer to 3.4/Q.1224). + +Information flows and information elements for these relationships are not specified in IN CS-2 Recommendations. Subclause B.6/Q.1224 describes some considerations on SMF-SMF internetworking aspect. + +- The SMF consists of seven functional components: FE Access Manager, Security Access Manager, Configuration Manager, Fault Manager, Performance Manager, Testing Manager and Security Control Manager (refer to clause 9/Q.1224). +- A method for establishing management information models for IN FEs is shown in Annex C/Q.1224. The method adopts three steps: + - decompose the FE to identify sub-entities to which management operations are applied; + - clarify the FE management requirements to identify a set of management operations applied on the FE sub-entities; and + - specify management information model by taking account of the output of the previous steps. + +The SSF is taken as an example to show the detailed procedure for each step of the proposed method. An example of the management information model of the SSF/CCF derived from the method is shown in the Appendix I/Q.1224. + +- Some of the testing functions necessary for the SSF/CCF to check integrity of the IN service processing functions in the SSF/CCF and usage of these testing functions are provided. An end-to-end testing capability is also considered to check out the fault node by using some parameters dedicated for the testing purpose, where these parameters are passed around the nodes and collect the necessary information (refer to Annex D/Q.1224). + +#### Protocol specification items + +Out of the scope of IN CS-2. + +### 7.1.16 Service Creation + +IN CS-2 Recommendations specify few things about this aspect. Subclause 7.2.13/Q.1221 provides the IN CS-2 target scope of this aspect and required functionalities. Subclause A.5/Q.1221 indicates IN CS-2 target Service Creation services/service features. Subclause B.4.3/Q.1224 provides a consideration on decomposition of the SCEF into TMN logical layers. + +### 7.1.17 GFP modelling and Service Independent Building Blocks for IN CS-2 + +IN CS-2 enhances GFP in various aspects. Enhancements regarding general aspects are described in Recommendation Q.1203 and IN CS-2 specific aspects are described in Recommendation Q.1223. This subclause provides an overview of IN CS-2 enhancements. The enhancements made include not only the SIBs modification but also the introduction of new concepts to GFP modelling. + +#### 7.1.17.1 GFP modelling + +IN CS-2 enhances the description capability of GFP capabilities and GSL (Global Service Logic) by introducing new concepts and elements outlined in the followings (refer to clause 4/Q.1223). + +- *Capability View and Service View* + +"Capability View" provides the capabilities of GFP within a single "Domain" by listing "SIBs" and "SIB operations". Within IN CS-1, SIBs are only means to describe GFP capabilities. IN CS-2 introduces new elements, "SIB operation", which has more precise level of granularity to describe capabilities of GFP. The set of SIBs and SIB operations expresses the capabilities of GFP and these also serve as basic elements to describe any GSL in GFP. + +"Service View" provides how IN CS-2 services or service features are realized. A service or service feature in GFP, namely a GSL, is expressed by a sequence of "High Level SIBs (HLSs)", "SIBs" and "SIB operations", while an IN CS-1 GSL is expressed by a sequence consisting of only SIBs. + +IN CS-2 largely enhances description capability of dynamic behaviour of GSLs (initiation, execution and termination of GSLs). This is done by "Service Process", where multiple service processes run concurrently and communicate with each other. By this enhancement, various services or service features having parallel processing activities can be described as GSLs. + +- *Domain* + +A domain expresses an area where a "service process" can be executed and separated from another domain by boundary. + +- *SIB operation* + +IN CS-2 introduced granularity into the SIB concept. A "SIB operation" is an atomic element of the SIB and a SIB generally consists of multiple SIB operations. SIB operations could form a GSL together with SIBs and/or HLSs. Three kinds of data – "Call Instance Data", "Service Support Data" and "Service Instance Data" – are used to define a SIB operation. SIB operations add more flexibility in describing GSLs to IN CS-1 GSL description capability. + +- *High Level SIB* + +The High Level SIB (HLS) provides another level of granularity to the SIB concept. A HLS composed of SIB operations and other HLS and is considered as a reusable part of GSLs. A HLS hides detailed information about its internal logic and some of "Service Support Data" + +which are local to the HLS. This characteristic will help a service designer to create GSLs easily. + +##### - *Service Process* + +A service process represents a GSL instance which resides in a single domain. A service process can not exist over multiple domains but can initiate another process in a different domain and they can run concurrently. A service process can communicate with other processes through "Point Of Synchronization" (refer to 4.5.5 and 4.5.6/Q.1223 for communications between processes). + +#### 7.1.17.2 Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs) + +In IN CS-2, 21 SIBs are defined, the IN CS-1 list of SIBs being enhanced by seven extra SIBs shown in the following to support the list of targeted services and service features identified in Recommendation Q.1221 (Refer to clause 5/Q.1223 for each SIB definition): + +- END: indicates the normal end of service process, or part of an service process in case of multiple threads. It also ends the authorization relationships between the service processes. +- INITIATE SERVICE PROCESS: causes the execution of the parallel service process to begin and it also establishes an authorization relationship for a user between the service processes. +- JOIN: attaches a call party or a group of call parties from the current call group into an indicated group within the same call. +- MESSAGE HANDLER: sends a message conveyed with Inter Process Data between a controlling and a supporting service process (refer to 4.1.2.3/Q.1223 for "controlling" and "supporting" service process). +- SPLIT: detaches a call party or group of call parties from the current call and attaches the indicated call parties in new initiated call or another existing call. +- Basic Call Unrelated Process (BCUP): is a specialized SIB which provides the call unrelated capabilities. BCUP is an independent process which communicates with CUUI (Call Un-related User Interaction) Service Processes. The concept is similar to that of "Basic Call Process" (refer to 6.2/Q.1223 for more details). + +END, INITIATE SERVICE PROCESS and MESSAGE HANDLER SIBs are introduced to describe processing activities in GFP. JOIN and SPLIT SIBs are introduced to describe CPH activities in GFP and BCUP SIB is introduced to model interworking process between a basic call unrelated process and a OCUUI GSL. + +The following SIBs have existed since IN CS-1 and re-defined in IN CS-2 by using IN CS-2 SIB definition method which adopts SIB operation concept (refer to 4.3.3/Q.1223 for the method and to clause 5/Q.1222 for the definition of each SIB). Some of these SIBs have enhanced capabilities to fulfill the IN CS-2 capability requirements: + +- ALGORITHM: applies a mathematical algorithm to data to produce a data result. +- AUTHENTICATE: provides the functionality necessary to establish a relationship between service logic and service data based on a specific user identity. This identity is used by subsequent service data access operations to determine if the user identity has the necessary access privileges to perform the requested operations. + +This SIB has enhanced its capability so as to meet the IN CS-2 security requirements. + +- CHARGE: determines special charging treatment for the call, where "special" refers to any charging in addition to that normally performed by the basic call process. + +In IN CS-2, this SIB provides the functionality for producing the data to be recorded physically. + +- COMPARE: performs a comparison of an identifier against a specified reference value. + +- DISTRIBUTION: distributes calls to different logical ends of the SIB based on user-specified parameters. +- LOG CALL INFORMATION: logs detailed information for each call into a file. The collected information may be used by management services (e.g. statistics) and not by call-related services. +- QUEUE: provides sequencing of IN calls to be completed to a called party. +- SCREEN: performs a comparison of data attributes against a filtered list of data attributes to determine whether the proposed values have been found in the list. +- SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT: enables action on service data (i.e. to be replaced, retrieved, incremented, decremented, stored and deleted). + +This SIB has enhanced its capability to handle a pre-defined series of data manipulation actions, known as entry method, a new capability introduced in IN CS-2. + +- SERVICE FILTER: filters the number of calls related to IN-provided service features. Such filtering will be based on user-specified parameters, such as Service Key, Destination Number. Filter Response can be reported to the service logic. The name of this SIB was "Limit" in IN CS-1 Recommendations but re-named "Service Filter". +- TRANSLATE: determines output information from input information. +- USER INTERACTION: allows information to be exchanged between the network and a call party, where a call party can be either a calling or a called party. + +This SIB is enhanced for the user interaction using out-band channel information (e.g. FACILITY IE) and for handling the User Interaction script which is a sequence of user interaction procedure. The Stage 1 definition of this SIB (SSD, CID, etc.) is enhanced to be able to handle the Component transferred between a user and the IN CS-2 network. + +- VERIFY: provides confirmation that information received is syntactically consistent with the expected form of such information. +- BASIC CALL PROCESS: a specialized SIB which allows access to IN service/service features represented through the use of chains of SIBs. The interface points between this SIB and GSL are described as Points of Initiation (POIs), Points of Return (PORs) and Points of Synchronization (POSs) (refer to 4.5.2.1 and 4.5.6/Q.1223). + +BCP definition has enhanced its interface points to reflect the IN CS-2 requirements of interaction between the basic call process and service logics to allow more interaction points. + +Annex A/Q.1223 provides a table showing relationships between SIBs and SIB operations. + +## 7.2 Detailed description + +This subclause describes useful information for IN CS-2 users such as general guidelines to use some specifications, example cases where some specifications are applied, or detailed protocol aspects, and so on. Descriptions in this subclause will supplement other IN CS-2 Recommendations. + +### 7.2.1 Service capabilities + +#### 7.2.1.1 Examples of service with multiple instances of Single Point of Control + +In IN CS-1/CS-2 compliant networks, the combination of services in one SSF is possible as described in the following examples. + +The first example is valid for IN CS-1 and CS-2, whereas the second example is valid within the scope of IN CS-2 and beyond. + +- 1) Charge Card service to a Premium Rate Number: The Charge Card service is invoked at the digit analyse information DP, and the Charge Card service logic carries out authentication, and collection of a B-party number. The call is then continued using the B-party number; since the B-party number is a Premium Rate number, a new control relationship is instantiated, and the analyse information trigger detects the Premium Rate service. The Premium Rate service logic then carries out the call distribution, number translation and special charging criteria. These two control relationships may be instituted in the same CCF/SSF. +- 2) A Charge Card call to a number with IN-based (CPH) Call Waiting: The Charge Card service is invoked at the digit analyse information DP. The Charge Card service logic then carries out authentication and collection of a B-party number. The call is then continued using the B-party number. As the B-party number is to a destination with IN-based Call Waiting, the Terminating BCSM will detect the Busy state of the destination at the T\_Busy DP and the Call Waiting service will be invoked. These two control relationships may be instantiated in the same CCF/SSF. + +### 7.2.2 Distributed functional plane + +#### 7.2.2.1 General consideration on internetworking between an IN structured public network and private networks + +Both types of networks, public and private, offer telecommunication services to their users. + +The need for interworking arises when the user communicates across boundaries between public IN structured networks and private networks. + +If the internetworking between private networks and IN structured public networks becomes necessary, there are several alternatives. One is to implement similar IN architecture in the private network; another is to make available in public networks some functions that provide access interface to those IN functions. Of course other solutions may exist. The second approach is dealt with in 3.3 and 3.4/Q.1224. See these subclauses for information pertaining to interworking with non-IN structured networks. + +Although the private networks involved may have different access types, e.g. ISDN or PSTN, and different levels of IN structuring (full, partial and no IN structuring) services must be provided to users in a consistent way. This involves cooperation of the networks to process and manage the services. + +Private networks have similar functions as defined in public IN structured networks but different architectures are found in private networks, e.g. centralized, decentralized. In non-IN structured private networks, service logic and service data does not have to be separated from basic call processing. + +In the case where the private network is not IN-structured, peer or equivalent functions are assumed in the private network. + +#### 7.2.2.2 SSF/CCF model + +##### 7.2.2.2.1 Multiple CDPN processing + +In IN CS-2, the originating basic half-call state model, O-BCSM, is modified so that multiple "called party number (CDPN)" parameters sent from an SLPI are handled appropriately. Transition from the O\_Alerting PIC to the Select\_Route PIC is added and description for some PICs are modified for this purpose. If route\_failure event is detected at Send\_Call PIC or O\_Alerting PIC, the BCSM transits to Select\_Route PIC and some route\_failure conditions on multiple CDPN parameters are checked at this PIC. If these conditions are met, the BCSM transits to Analyse\_Information PIC and the next CDPN is processed (refer to 4.2.2.1.4, 4.2.2.1.5, 4.2.2.1.7 and 4.2.2.1.8/Q.1224). + +##### 7.2.2.2.2 Impacts of Reconnect operation on PICs + +###### 7.2.2.2.2.1 Operation sequence when the controlling party goes "on-hook" + +Figure 7.1 shows an example of the case where "Reconnect" operation processing is required at the SSF/CCF. In this example, party "c" goes "on-hook", and SSF sends a report of ODisconnect or TSuspended (as appropriate). + +![Diagram illustrating the transition from 'Call on Hold' to 'Stable 2-Party' after leg 'c' goes 'on-hook'.](56a5265d174ce056c1dbe5e7a60839fc_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two states of a call. On the left, 'Call on Hold' is represented by a box containing two legs: leg 'c' (labeled '2') and leg 'p2', and leg 'p1' (labeled '1'). A dashed line separates the two legs. Below this box, text says 'leg "c" goes "on-hook"'. An arrow points from this box to the right. On the right, 'Stable 2-Party' is represented by a box containing two legs: leg 'c' (labeled '1') and leg 'p1' (labeled '1'). Below this box is the text 'T1199680-98'. + +Diagram illustrating the transition from 'Call on Hold' to 'Stable 2-Party' after leg 'c' goes 'on-hook'. + +**Figure 7-1/Q.1229 – An example case where "Reconnect" operation is needed** + +In this case, the SSF responds with the following message sequence to effect the transition from the "Call on Hold" CVS (Connection View State) to the "Stable 2-Party" CVS, after the controlling party goes "on-hook". + +DisconnectLeg (p2) + MergeCallSegments + Reconnect + +NOTE 1 – There is an alternative message sequence shown in the following: + +ReleaseCall (CSID "2") + Reconnect + +However, this approach has the following disadvantages: + +- It is not clearly understood how the call on hold (CS "1", with a "shared" controlling leg) will interact with the request to release the associated call (CS "2"). +- Which of the resources associated with the controlling leg would SSF/CCF clear when it processes the ReleaseCall (CSID "2") operation? The answer to this question may be implementation-dependent. + +NOTE 2 – These operation sequences would also apply to the other two transition examples illustrated in 4.3/Q.1224. + +The following subclauses include consideration on: + +- impacts of "Reconnect" operation on BCSM; and +- possible Reconnect support for ISDN users. + +###### 7.2.2.2.2.2 Call Processing Model + +IN CS-2 specification defines no new PICs or DPs for the processing of the Reconnect operation. However, a new sub-state ("Re\_Ring") to the O/T\_Active and O\_Suspended PICs are considered for this processing. Figures 7-2 and 7-3 capture the modelling of the internal "Re-Ring" sub-state. + +The states internal to the existing PICs are illustrated with dashed lines. When SSF/CCF receives the Reconnect operation to request reconnection of the controlling leg with the held party, the call on hold may be in the O\_Active, O\_Suspended or T\_Suspended PIC. Call processing then moves into the internal sub-state entitled "Re\_Ring", alerts the controlling leg (via power ringing and/or display information), sets the reconnect timer, and awaits a reconnect indication from the controlling leg. Expiration of the reconnect timer is considered an exception event, and the call is cleared. However, if the controlling leg reconnects within the allotted time, then call processing moves to the + +O/T\_Mid\_Call DP (via the indicated PIC). That is, the "Reconnect Success" event may be visible to IN as a mid-call event. + +![Figure 7-2/Q.1229 – 'Re-Ring' sub-state in the O-BCSM. This state transition diagram shows two main states: O_Active and O_Suspended. O_Active has transitions to O_Suspended (labeled O_Sus.) and back to O_Active (labeled O_Re-Ans.). Both states have an external transition labeled O_Mid_Call. A dashed box labeled 'Reconnect Sub-PIC' contains two sub-states, Re_Ring 1 and Re_Ring 2. Transitions from O_Active and O_Suspended lead to these sub-states (labeled O_Disc.), and dashed return arrows lead back to the main states.](feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-2/Q.1229 – 'Re-Ring' sub-state in the O-BCSM. This state transition diagram shows two main states: O\_Active and O\_Suspended. O\_Active has transitions to O\_Suspended (labeled O\_Sus.) and back to O\_Active (labeled O\_Re-Ans.). Both states have an external transition labeled O\_Mid\_Call. A dashed box labeled 'Reconnect Sub-PIC' contains two sub-states, Re\_Ring 1 and Re\_Ring 2. Transitions from O\_Active and O\_Suspended lead to these sub-states (labeled O\_Disc.), and dashed return arrows lead back to the main states. + +Figure 7-2/Q.1229 – "Re-Ring" sub-state in the O-BCSM + +![Figure 7-3/Q.1229 – 'Re-Ring' sub-state in the T-BCSM. This state transition diagram shows two main states: T_Active and T_Suspended. T_Active has transitions to T_Suspended (labeled T_Sus.) and back to T_Active (labeled T_Re-Ans.). Both states have an external transition labeled T_Mid_Call. A dashed box labeled 'Reconnect Sub-PIC' contains a sub-state, Re_Ring 3. Transitions from T_Active and T_Suspended lead to this sub-state (labeled T_Disc.), and a dashed return arrow leads back to the main states.](fd3cbb53e991f8209ba17b398f426e13_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-3/Q.1229 – 'Re-Ring' sub-state in the T-BCSM. This state transition diagram shows two main states: T\_Active and T\_Suspended. T\_Active has transitions to T\_Suspended (labeled T\_Sus.) and back to T\_Active (labeled T\_Re-Ans.). Both states have an external transition labeled T\_Mid\_Call. A dashed box labeled 'Reconnect Sub-PIC' contains a sub-state, Re\_Ring 3. Transitions from T\_Active and T\_Suspended lead to this sub-state (labeled T\_Disc.), and a dashed return arrow leads back to the main states. + +Figure 7-3/Q.1229 – "Re-Ring" sub-state in the T-BCSM + +###### 7.2.2.2.2.3 ISDN considerations + +The Reconnect operation should also provide support for an ISDN controlling leg. A recommended approach is the addition of the "DisplayInformation" parameter to the "Reconnect" operation, in order to provide better support for an ISDN user. + +##### 7.2.2.2.3 BCSM transitions related to Call Waiting + +The following provisions and transitions may be used to support the offering of "Call Waiting" to an originating caller where the originating call is in various set-up phases. + +- If the originating call is between O\_Null PIC and Originating\_Attempt\_Authorised DP, the Originating call should transit to O\_Abandon DP, the originating call attempt is abandoned and the Waiting Call at the T\_BCSM will proceed from T\_Busy DP to Present\_Call PIC and T\_Answer DP in the expected way. +- If the originating call is between Collect\_Information PIC and the (new) O\_Term\_Seized DP the Originating call continues uninterrupted into the O\_Alerting PIC (Stable State). During the transient call progressing phase the Waiting Call should be queued. An Announcement could be played to the Calling party on the Waiting Call. + +- If the originating call is in the O\_Alerting PIC (Stable State), or when it reaches it (see point above) the option should exist for the Originating call to be interrupted with the Call Offer indication from the Waiting Call (during the initial call's Alerting Phase). If the Originating user who receives the Offered Call invokes the Call Waiting, the Alerting call will be put on Hold in the O\_BCSM. To support this requirement, it was agreed that the O\_Alerting PIC requires an exit and re-entry condition to O\_Mid\_Call. + +The Waiting Call at the T\_BCSM will proceed from T\_Busy DP to Present\_Call PIC and T\_Answer DP in the expected way. + +If the Held B\_Party answers the initial call during the On Hold condition, the T\_BCSM will proceed from T\_Alerting (On Hold) to T\_Active (On Hold) via the T\_Answer DP, these events being reported to the O\_BCSM in the usual manner. The Held B\_Party must have a comfort Announcement played as soon as the T\_Answer DP is encountered from T\_Alerting (On Hold) PIC. + +The user may toggle between the two calls in the usual way. + +##### 7.2.2.2.4 Multiple retriggering + +The IN CS-2 Recommendations do not specify a method to limit the number of times a call can retrigger. It also does not specify any method to prevent retriggering where the information received in a response contains the same as the criteria for the original trigger. For example, if the trigger criteria at the Analysed\_Information DP is 555-1111, and the SCF returns in the Destination Routing Address a CDPN of 555-1111, the call will trigger at the Analysed\_Information DP again. This effectively produces an infinite loop. + +The following text provides two possible solutions to the problem (others may be possible), but none of these are mandatory. + +###### 1) *Letting the SCF prevent multiple retrigger* + +This solution means that the SCF contains enough logic that it will never return the same Called Party Number as was received, if the trigger criteria was the Called Party Number. If the trigger criteria was something else, such as Shared Interoffice Trunk, then returning the same Called Party Number is not an issue. + +###### 2) *Letting the SSF prevent multiple retriggering* + +This solution means the SSF will count the number of times a call is triggered to the SCF, on a per half-call basis. If the count exceeds a set limit, the SSF could take appropriate action (e.g. the call could be taken down or another suitable action). + +#### 7.2.2.3 SRF model + +##### 7.2.2.3.1 SRF Enhanced functions + +This subclause presents all the possible actions the SRF is able to perform. We try to give them a standard input and output. We begin by describing the elementary actions which are combined together to build the enhanced functions. + +###### 7.2.2.3.1.1 Elementary actions + +We found three elementary actions: + +- Prompt playing: The purpose is to play a message, followed by a silence of adjustable duration. This can be interrupted by DTMF detection, speech detection, hang up, or an external message from a distant unit. +- Speech recording: The purpose is to record in a file the user's voice during a specific time and as long as no event occurs: (DTMF detection, silence detection, hang up, external message) or the end of allowed recording time. + +- Data manipulation: such as operation on numbers, lists, strings or tables. The purpose is to control the number of prompts repetition or the data format. + +###### **7.2.2.3.1.2 Enhanced functions** + +The purpose is to define some standard enhanced functions, but not the entire set of enhanced functions. The enhanced function has to be customized to the service. They should be adapted to the current context of the call (human factors choices, ...) independently of the global service logic (the SCF). + +###### **7.2.2.3.1.2.1 Information diffusion** + +This enhanced function indicates to the user the state he is currently in. The information can be played several times with a variable degree of details. + +The possible exits are: + +- dtmf action (Result = name of DTMF); +- speech detection (Result = Detection); +- end of work (Result = End); +- external event (Result = External). + +###### **7.2.2.3.1.2.2 Get an information** + +This enhanced function allows the user to enter an information like a card number, a pin code or a phone number to be called. This allows procedure cancellation and error recovery. + +It is divided into three phases: + +- Prompts user to dial a number. In this case the user can cancel by pressing "star". The enhanced function exits with Result = Cancel. +- The Dial Number phase. The SRF is waiting for the keyed-in DTMF. Depending on the input, the enhanced function can: + - exit with Result = OK and the Number is given to the SCF; + - go to the Error Handling phase, if some errors occur; + - return to the Dial Number phase. + +The Error Management phase monitors the number of errors. If the user exceeds the number of attempts allowed, the SCF closes the user interaction. If not, the user may be informed of his mistake and be invited to prompt another number. + +###### **7.2.2.3.1.2.3 Speaker Verification (SV)** + +Speaker Verification is the process of verifying a person's claimed identity by analysing a sample of that person's speech. This form of security is based on the premise that humans can, to some degree of confidence, be identified by their speech. For telephone-based applications requiring access authorization, speaker verification can be used to identify or validate the caller. Before gaining access, however, the caller is required to have previously enrolled in a reference database. This enrollment is typically accomplished by repeating a multi-digit password several times. + +Many varieties of applications can benefit from Speaker Verification technology. For example, banks and other financial service companies can greatly enhance the security of existing telephone-based account access system. The technology provides secure access to all callers, including rotary telephone users, and performs verification transparently during ordinary transactions, rather than requiring entry of supplemental phrases or PINs. The secure access is obtained much more quickly and easily than is possible with commonly used or suggested methods requiring supplemental keypad entry of PINs or spoken entry of additional phrases for speaker verification. + +An example of speaker verification decision strategy is shown in Figure 7-4. + +![Flowchart of Speaker Verification Decision Strategy](e0627c8e3dfda5da1ee8d5a90c9f7489_img.jpg) + +``` +graph LR; A[Speech Signal] --> B[Extraction of characteristic parameters]; B --> C[Verification Reference Data]; C --> D((Reference Database)); D --> C; C --> E[Verification Decision Algorithm]; E --> F[Verification or Rejection]; +``` + +The diagram illustrates the speaker verification decision strategy. It begins with a 'Speech Signal' input to a box labeled 'Extraction of characteristic parameters'. This box outputs to a box labeled 'Verification Reference Data'. From this box, an arrow points to an oval labeled 'Reference Database'. A return arrow goes from the 'Reference Database' back to the 'Verification Reference Data' box. From the 'Verification Reference Data' box, an arrow points to a box labeled 'Verification Decision Algorithm'. This box outputs to the final result, 'Verification or Rejection'. A small label 'T1199710-98' is located near the bottom right of the diagram. + +Flowchart of Speaker Verification Decision Strategy + +**Figure 7-4/Q.1229 – Speaker Verification Decision Strategy** + +All reference parameters for each enrolled user are initialized on the first enrollment call, during which the password is typically spoken several times. Reference parameters could be gradually and cautiously updated upon each subsequent call. The reference parameters represent a sort of signature or "voiceprint" of each enrolled user; several other parameters are used to adjust the general strictness of verification. Some parameters are global in effect; others are user-specific, affecting only individual enrolled users. + +An example of the implementation of this function could be a feature like Voice Identification. It allows users to place an outgoing call from anywhere, using their calling card. The user dials an access code and after the procedure of identification, by a keyword or general word, the user will be able to speak the number desired, or the name with procedures like VAD. Identification procedures are based on the Speaker Verification function in the SRF. + +#### **7.2.2.4 SDF model** + +##### **7.2.2.4.1 SDF security** + +The X.500-series Recommendations (1993) provide some mechanisms to ensure the security of the communication between a DUA and a DSA. In IN, one of the communications to be protected is between the IN user and the SDF. Only the "bind" operation permits to embed mechanisms to authenticate an IN user to its provider database. + +For the other security features between the customer and the database, the "execute" operation permits to offer them. + +###### **7.2.2.4.1.1 Security facilities examples** + +In several facilities, it is common to use mechanisms based on messages structured in two parts as follows: + +- The first part is filled with data. +- The second part is the transformation of the first part by a symmetric (resp. asymmetric) cryptographic algorithm with a secret key (resp. private key). + +We will use the following definitions: + +###### **verifier:** + +An entity which gets the assurance of an assertion by directly exchanging information with the prover or by getting an OK or a token from another authority. + +Generally when two-part messages of the type described above are used, the verifier runs an algorithm to verify the conformance of the first part with public non-cryptographic properties (e.g. timestamp range, counter value, matching area, size, ...) and checks that the result of the transformation of the first part by a cryptographic algorithm has been done by an entity which knows a secret key (symmetric) or a private key (asymmetric). + +###### **prover:** + +An entity which makes an assertion to prove something (identity, authenticity of a message). Generally, the prover can make a two-part message (e.g. one-way authentication, certificated messages) or, if given the first part, the prover can provide the second part (e.g. two-way authentication). + +###### **authority:** + +An entity which provides the assurance of validity to a verifier. This authority is able to ensure a verifier of the validity of the prover but it might be unable to get this assurance for itself (e.g. untrusted verifier). + +###### **one-way authentication:** + +The data of the first part include a non-repeating number which is used to detect replay attacks and to prevent forgery. To avoid to have to store all the used numbers, it is common to use a counter or a number-including-time information. The second choice also permits to limit the lifetime of the authentication message, when many authentications could occur in the same laps of time (e.g. large time windows to take into account imprecise clocks or time transit) a random number is concatenated. + +The verifier authenticates the prover after the following two verifications: + +- The number has not be used before (e.g. check of counter or time range); +- In the case of a symmetric algorithm, the computation of the first part with the secret key as parameter matched the second part. In the case of an asymmetric algorithm, the computation of the second part with the public key as parameter matched the first part. + +To reduce "Trojan horse" attacks, some contextual data, could be added to the first part of the message. Such as geographic information, transmission channel number. With these data a bad guy who induces a legitimate user to provide a valid message (e.g. by masquerading as a network) cannot use the stolen message elsewhere. + +Similar mechanisms could be used to offer features such verification of a certificated message. + +###### **two-way authentication:** + +Several scenarios could be selected depending on the number of involved entities (commonly 2 or 3). + +###### *Scenario 1* + +The verifier is an entity of a service provider, the prover is the terminal of the user. + +The verifier sends a random number, the prover answers, the verifier checks the answer. + +When the protocol between the verifier and the prover is connectionless. + +The verifier stores the sent random number, the answer message from the prover is a two-part message structured as the previously (data, result of a cryptographic transformation of these data). + +The data will be the random received by the user, the second part of the computation of this random number by the user key contained by the terminal. + +The verifier authenticates the prover after the two following verifications: + +- the data is legal to the stored random number; +- in the case of a symmetric algorithm, the computation of the first part with the secret key as parameter matched the second part. In the case of an asymmetric algorithm, the computation of the second part with the public key as parameter matched the first part. + +###### *Scenario 2* + +The authority H which shares a secret key with the user (or knows the public key of the user) is an entity of the provider (e.g. a SDF). + +A verifier V which trusts the previous verifier is another entity of the provider (e.g. an SCF), the prover is the terminal of the user. + +The verifier V sends a random number to the prover, collects the answer of the prover and sends the random number and the response to the authority H; H returns an OK to V. + +The authority H needs only to run the second verification: + +- In the case of a symmetric algorithm, the computation of the first part with the secret key as parameter matched the second part. In the case of an asymmetric algorithm, the computation of the second part with the public key as parameter matched the first part. + +In order that the authority H could be also a verifier, the random number has to be replaced as in the one-way authentication by a non-repeating number. + +The data would be the non-repeating number and H will run, before the previous verification, the following verification: + +- the number has not been used before (e.g. check of counter or time range). + +###### *Scenario 3* + +The verifier asks a third party for information to carry on the authentication. This information could be the certificated public key or a precomputed couple (challenge, response). + +The third party needs: + +- an entry method to fill the first part (e.g. read the public key attribute, generate a random number, set up a session key); and +- a cryptographic algorithm to compute the result. + +### **7.2.3 Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP)** + +#### **7.2.3.1 INAP FSM interactions** + +Clauses 11 to 15/Q.1228 define a number of FSM specifications to handle FE to FE interactions during call processing. This subclause contains diagrams which identify the relationships between the defined FEs during specific call processing conditions. In particular the diagrams identify: + +- a) the message path which operations pass through as they travel between FEs. This may involve a signalling stack (thin solid line) or a bearer connection (thick solid line). +- b) the FSM level at which unique TC Dialogues (dashed lines) are established between a pair of FEs which use a signalling path to exchange operations. + +##### 7.2.3.1.1 SSF/SCF/SRF + +Figure 7-5 shows the FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF communication. + +![Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF communication in two scenarios: direct IP connection and SSF relay IP connection. The diagram includes lifelines for SSF, SCF, and SRF, showing message paths, TCAP dialogues, and bearer connections between their internal components.](e2b7490a3455c66c85db12872c78fcc3_img.jpg) + +**i) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, direct IP connection** + +The diagram shows the following interactions for the direct IP connection scenario: + +- SSF** (Service Switching Function) contains components: SSME-control, FSM for CSA, and FSM for CS. +- SCF** (Service Control Function) contains components: SCME-control, SSF/SRF, FSM for CSA, FSM for CS, and Spec.Resource. +- SRF** (Specialized Resource Function) contains components: SRME-control and SRSM. +- A solid line (Message path) connects SSF's SSME-control to SCF's SCME-control. +- A dashed line (TCAP dialogue) connects SSF's FSM for CSA to SCF's FSM for CSA. +- A thick solid line (Bearer connection) originates from SSF's FSM for CS, passes through SCF's Spec.Resource, and connects to SRF's SRSM. +- A thin solid line connects SCF's SCME-control to SRF's SRME-control. + +**ii) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, SSF relay IP connection** + +The diagram shows the following interactions for the SSF relay IP connection scenario: + +- The components are the same as in scenario i). +- A solid line (Message path) connects SSF's SSME-control to SCF's SCME-control. +- A dashed line (TCAP dialogue) connects SSF's FSM for CSA to SCF's FSM for CSA. +- A thick solid line (Bearer connection) originates from SSF's FSM for CS and connects to SRF's SRSM, bypassing the Spec.Resource in SCF. +- A thin solid line connects SCF's SCME-control to SRF's SRME-control. + +**Legend:** + +- Message path +- - - - TCAP dialogue +- Bearer connection + +CSA Call Segment Association +FSM Finite State Machine +SCF Service Control Function +SRF Specialized Resource Function +SSF Service Switching Function + +T1199720-98 + +Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF communication in two scenarios: direct IP connection and SSF relay IP connection. The diagram includes lifelines for SSF, SCF, and SRF, showing message paths, TCAP dialogues, and bearer connections between their internal components. + +**Figure 7-5/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF** + +##### 7.2.3.1.2 SSF/SCF/SRF with assisting SSP + +Figure 7-6 shows the FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF communication which utilizes an assisting SSF. + +![Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF with assisting SSP. Part (i) shows normal call processing with a direct IP connection. Part (ii) shows normal call processing with a relay IP connection. Lifelines include SSF, SSF Assisting, SCF, and SRF. Interactions involve SSME-control, SCME-control, SRME-control, FSM for CSA, FSM for CS, Assisting SSF, Spec. Resource, and SRSM. Solid lines represent message paths, dashed lines represent TCAP dialogues, and thick solid lines represent bearer connections.](b35ea3e304aad7d350a9902270413930_img.jpg) + +**i) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, assisting SSP with direct IP connection** + +**ii) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, assisting SSP with relay IP connection** + +Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF with assisting SSP. Part (i) shows normal call processing with a direct IP connection. Part (ii) shows normal call processing with a relay IP connection. Lifelines include SSF, SSF Assisting, SCF, and SRF. Interactions involve SSME-control, SCME-control, SRME-control, FSM for CSA, FSM for CS, Assisting SSF, Spec. Resource, and SRSM. Solid lines represent message paths, dashed lines represent TCAP dialogues, and thick solid lines represent bearer connections. + +T1199730-98 + +CSA Call Segment Association +FSM Finite State Machine +SCF Service Control Function +SRF Specialized Resource Function +SSF Service Switching Function + +Message path + TCAP dialogue + Bearer connection + +Figure 7-6/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF with assisting SSF + +##### 7.2.3.1.3 SSF/SCF/SRF with handed-off SSP + +Figure 7-7 shows the FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF communication which utilizes a handed-off SSF. + +![Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF with handed-off SSP. Part (i) shows direct IP connection, and part (ii) shows relay IP connection. Lifelines include SSF, SSF Handed-off, SCF, and SRF. The diagrams show message paths, TCAP dialogues, and bearer connections between these entities.](c3254408eadbf152632a8faf16310722_img.jpg) + +The diagram consists of two sequence diagrams, (i) and (ii), illustrating the interaction between four lifelines: SSF, SSF Handed-off, SCF, and SRF. + +**i) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, handed-off SSP with direct IP connection** + +- The SSF lifeline contains SSME-control, FSM for CSA, and FSM for CS. +- The SSF Handed-off lifeline contains SSME-control and Handed-off SSF. +- The SCF lifeline contains SCME-control, SSF/SRF, FSM for CSA, FSM for CS, Handed-off SSF, and Spec. Resource. +- The SRF lifeline contains SRME-control and SRSM. +- A thick solid line (Bearer connection) originates from the FSM for CS in the SSF, steps down to the Handed-off SSF in the SSF Handed-off lifeline, steps down again to the SCF lifeline, and finally connects to the SRSM in the SRF lifeline. +- Dashed lines (TCAP dialogue) connect the FSM for CSA in the SSF to the FSM for CSA in the SCF, and the Spec. Resource in the SCF to the SRSM in the SRF. +- Solid lines (Message path) connect the SSME-control in the SSF to the SCME-control in the SCF, and the SCME-control in the SCF to the SRME-control in the SRF. A diagonal message path also connects the SSME-control in the SSF Handed-off to the SCME-control in the SCF. + +**ii) SSF-SCF, normal call processing, handed-off SSP with relay IP connection** + +- The lifelines and their internal components are identical to scenario (i). +- The thick solid line (Bearer connection) follows a similar path but includes an additional step in the SCF lifeline before reaching the SRSM in the SRF. +- The message paths and TCAP dialogues are also similar to scenario (i), maintaining the same connectivity between the control and resource functions. + +Sequence diagrams showing FSM interactions for SSF/SCF/SRF with handed-off SSP. Part (i) shows direct IP connection, and part (ii) shows relay IP connection. Lifelines include SSF, SSF Handed-off, SCF, and SRF. The diagrams show message paths, TCAP dialogues, and bearer connections between these entities. + +T1199740-98 + +- CSA Call Segment Association +- FSM Finite State Machine +- SCF Service Control Function +- SRF Specialized Resource Function +- SSF Service Switching Function + +- Message path +- TCAP dialogue +- Bearer connection + +**Figure 7-7/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SSF/SRF/SCF with handed-off SSF** + +##### 7.2.3.1.4 SCF-SCF + +Figure 7-8 shows the FSM interactions for SCF/SCF communication. + +![Sequence diagrams showing SCF-SCF interactions between SCF_A, SCF_B, SCF_C, and SCF_D. The diagram is divided into three parts: i) SCF-SCF, no chaining; ii) SCF-SCF, with chaining; and iii) SCF-SCF, chaining with BC internetwork. Each part shows message paths (solid lines) and TCAP dialogues (dashed lines) between the Service Control Functions (SCFs) and their associated control and state machines (SCME-control, SCSM-Con, SCSM-Sup, SCSM-ChI, SCSM-ChT).](24ca460ee3381aee781887e9e586ec67_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates three scenarios of SCF-SCF communication: + +- i) SCF-SCF, no chaining:** SCFA sends a message path to SCFB. SCFA has an internal TCAP dialogue (dashed line) between SCME-control and SCSM-Con. SCFB has an internal TCAP dialogue between SCME-control and SCSM-Sup. +- ii) SCF-SCF, with chaining:** SCFA sends a message path to SCFB. SCFB sends a message path to SCFC. SCFA has an internal TCAP dialogue between SCME-control and SCSM-Con. SCFB has internal TCAP dialogues between SCME-control and SCSM-Sup, and between SCSM-Sup and SCSM-ChI. SCFC has an internal TCAP dialogue between SCME-control and SCSM-ChT. +- iii) SCF-SCF, chaining with BC internetwork:** SCFA sends a message path to SCFB. SCFB sends a message path to SCFC. SCFC sends a message path to SCFD. SCFA has an internal TCAP dialogue between SCME-control and SCSM-Con. SCFB has internal TCAP dialogues between SCME-control and SCSM-Sup, and between SCSM-Sup and SCSM-ChI. SCFC has internal TCAP dialogues between SCME-control and SCSM-ChT, and between SCSM-ChT and SCSM-ChI. SCFD has an internal TCAP dialogue between SCME-control and SCSM-ChT. + +Sequence diagrams showing SCF-SCF interactions between SCF\_A, SCF\_B, SCF\_C, and SCF\_D. The diagram is divided into three parts: i) SCF-SCF, no chaining; ii) SCF-SCF, with chaining; and iii) SCF-SCF, chaining with BC internetwork. Each part shows message paths (solid lines) and TCAP dialogues (dashed lines) between the Service Control Functions (SCFs) and their associated control and state machines (SCME-control, SCSM-Con, SCSM-Sup, SCSM-ChI, SCSM-ChT). + +T1199750-98 + +CSA Call Segment Association + FSM Finite State Machine + SCF Service Control Function + SRF Specialized Resource Function + SSF Service Switching Function + +—— Message path + ---- TCAP dialogue + +Figure 7-8/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SCF/SCF + +##### 7.2.3.1.5 SCF-SDF + +Figure 7-9 shows the FSM interactions for SCF/SDF communication. + +![Sequence diagram Figure 7-9 showing FSM interactions for SCF/SDF communication across three scenarios: i) SCF-SDF, ii) SCF-SDF with chaining, and iii) SCF-SDF chaining with internetwork BC. The diagram features four vertical lifelines: SCFA, SDFB, SDFC, and SDFD. It uses solid lines for message paths and dashed lines for TCAP dialogues between various functional entities like SCME-control, SDME-control, SCSM-SDF, SDSM-SCF, SDSM-ChI, and SDSM-ChT.](7f7211748473542096717109ebe5a9d6_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Service Control Function (SCF) and multiple Service Data Functions (SDF). It is organized into four vertical lifelines: SCFA, SDFB, SDFC, and SDFD. The interactions are categorized into three scenarios: + +- i) SCF-SDF:** SCFA establishes a message path (solid line) from SCME-control to SDFB's SDME-control. A TCAP dialogue (dashed line) is established between SCSM-SDF on SCFA and SDSM-SCF on SDFB. +- ii) SCF-SDF, with chaining:** SCFA connects to SDFB as in scenario (i). SDFB then chains to SDFC by extending the message path from its SDME-control to SDFC's SDME-control. A TCAP dialogue is established between SDSM-ChI on SDFB and SDSM-ChT on SDFC. +- iii) SCF-SDF chaining, with internetwork BC:** This scenario extends scenario (ii) further. The message path is extended from SDFC's SDME-control to SDFD's SDME-control. A TCAP dialogue is established between SDSM-ChI on SDFC and SDSM-ChT on SDFD. + +T1199760-98 + +Sequence diagram Figure 7-9 showing FSM interactions for SCF/SDF communication across three scenarios: i) SCF-SDF, ii) SCF-SDF with chaining, and iii) SCF-SDF chaining with internetwork BC. The diagram features four vertical lifelines: SCFA, SDFB, SDFC, and SDFD. It uses solid lines for message paths and dashed lines for TCAP dialogues between various functional entities like SCME-control, SDME-control, SCSM-SDF, SDSM-SCF, SDSM-ChI, and SDSM-ChT. + +CSA Call Segment Association +FSM Finite State Machine +SCF Service Control Function +SRF Specialized Resource Function +SSF Service Switching Function + +— Message path +- - - TCAP dialogue + +**Figure 7-9/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SCF/SDF** + +##### 7.2.3.1.6 SDF-SDF + +Figure 7-10 shows the FSM interactions for SDF/SDF communication. + +![Sequence diagram showing SDF-SDF replication interactions between SDFA and SDFB. Part i) shows supplier-initiated replication with SDME-control and SDSM-ShCSi messages. Part ii) shows consumer-initiated replication with SDME-control and SDSM-ShCCi messages.](c06fd7dbef68a8b788158f2081d9d734_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates two interaction scenarios between two Service Data Functions, SDFA and SDFB. + +**i) SDF-SDF replication, supplier initiated** + +In this scenario, SDFA (the supplier) initiates the replication. A solid message path is shown from the SDME-control FSM in SDFA to the SDME-control FSM in SDFB. A dashed TCAP dialogue is shown from the SDSM-ShCSi FSM in SDFA to the SDSM-ShSSi FSM in SDFB. + +**ii) SDF-SDF replication, consumer initiated** + +In this scenario, SDFB (the consumer) initiates the replication. A solid message path is shown from the SDME-control FSM in SDFB to the SDME-control FSM in SDFA. A dashed TCAP dialogue is shown from the SDSM-ShCCi FSM in SDFB to the SDSM-ShSCi FSM in SDFA. + +Legend: + +- Message path +- TCAP dialogue + +T1199770-98 + +- CSA Call Segment Association +- FSM Finite State Machine +- SCF Service Control Function +- SRF Specialized Resource Function +- SSF Service Switching Function + +Sequence diagram showing SDF-SDF replication interactions between SDFA and SDFB. Part i) shows supplier-initiated replication with SDME-control and SDSM-ShCSi messages. Part ii) shows consumer-initiated replication with SDME-control and SDSM-ShCCi messages. + +**Figure 7-10/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for SDF/SDF** + +##### 7.2.3.1.7 Other + +Figure 7-11 shows the FSM interactions for SSF/SCF management, SSF/SCF user-to-service and CUSF/SCF communication. + +![Sequence diagram showing FSM interactions between CUSF, SSF, and SCF across three interfaces: i) SSF-SCF management, ii) SSF-SCF user-to-service interface, and iii) CUSF-SCF interface. The diagram uses solid lines for message paths and dashed lines for TCAP dialogues.](d512ce4e3ac0de6c26d0e74a85ef2cbd_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interactions between three entities: CUSF, SSF, and SCF. It is divided into three sections: + +- i) SSF-SCF management:** Shows interactions between SSF and SCF. SSF contains 'SSME-control' and 'SSME-FSM' components. SCF contains 'SCME-control' and 'SCME-FSM' components. A solid line connects 'SSME-control' to 'SCME-control', and a dashed line connects 'SSME-FSM' to 'SCME-FSM'. +- ii) SSF-SCF user-to-service interface:** Shows interactions between SSF and SCF. SSF contains 'SSME-control' and 'SSF\_USI' components. SCF contains 'SCME-control' and 'USI\_SCF' components. A solid line connects 'SSME-control' to 'SCME-control', and a dashed line connects 'SSF\_USI' to 'USI\_SCF'. +- iii) CUSF-SCF interface:** Shows interactions between CUSF and SCF. CUSF contains 'SCSME-control' and 'CUSF FSM' components. SCF contains 'SCME-control' and 'SCSM-CUSF' components. A solid line connects 'SCSME-control' to 'SCME-control', and a dashed line connects 'CUSF FSM' to 'SCSM-CUSF'. + +Legend: + +- Message path +- - - - TCAP dialogue + +Definitions: + +- CSA Call Segment Association +- FSM Finite State Machine +- SCF Service Control Function +- SRF Specialized Resource Function +- SSF Service Switching Function + +T1199780-98 + +Sequence diagram showing FSM interactions between CUSF, SSF, and SCF across three interfaces: i) SSF-SCF management, ii) SSF-SCF user-to-service interface, and iii) CUSF-SCF interface. The diagram uses solid lines for message paths and dashed lines for TCAP dialogues. + +Figure 7-11/Q.1229 – FSM interactions for remaining FSMs + +#### 7.2.3.2 Example of use of the Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction feature + +##### 7.2.3.2.1 MSCs illustrating an example of use of the Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction + +Several MSCs should be considered depending on the following points: + +- The association is opened by the User or by the SCF. +- The association is released by the User or by the SCF. + +###### 1) *Opening of an association by the User* + +The User initiates an association with the SCF as in Figure 7-12: + +![Sequence diagram for association establishment from the User. Lifelines: User, CUSF, SCF. The User sends a REGISTER[Facility][CRi] to the CUSF. The CUSF triggers the SCF with TC-BEGIN-j [activationReceived&Authorized]. The SCF responds with TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, sendComponent]. The CUSF then relays a FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the User. This is followed by a loop of 'N times' where the User sends FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the CUSF, which triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF then sends another TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, sendComponent] and the CUSF relays another FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the User. Labels 'Triggering', 'Relaying', and 'Event reporting' are used to describe the interactions between the User, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram is labeled T1199790-98.](8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for association establishment from the User. Lifelines: User, CUSF, SCF. The User sends a REGISTER[Facility][CRi] to the CUSF. The CUSF triggers the SCF with TC-BEGIN-j [activationReceived&Authorized]. The SCF responds with TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, sendComponent]. The CUSF then relays a FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the User. This is followed by a loop of 'N times' where the User sends FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the CUSF, which triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF then sends another TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, sendComponent] and the CUSF relays another FACILITY [Facility][CRi] to the User. Labels 'Triggering', 'Relaying', and 'Event reporting' are used to describe the interactions between the User, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram is labeled T1199790-98. + +**Figure 7-12/Q.1229 – Association establishment from the User** + +Later on, the User and the SCF dialogue using the Call Reference i between the User and the CUSF and the TCAP transaction j between the CUSF and the SCF. + +###### 2) *Opening of an association by the SCF* + +The SCF initiates an association with the User as in Figure 7-13: + +![Sequence diagram for association establishment from the SCF. Lifelines: User, CUSF, SCF. The SCF initiates the association with the CUSF using TC-BEGIN-j [initiateAssociation, requestReportBCUSMEvent]. The CUSF addresses the User with REGISTER[Facility][CRi]. The User responds with FACILITY[Facility][CRi]. The CUSF then triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF responds with TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, SendComponent]. The CUSF then relays a FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the User. This is followed by a loop of 'N times' where the User sends FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the CUSF, which triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF then sends another TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, SendComponent] and the CUSF relays another FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the User. Labels 'Addressing', 'Event Reporting', and 'Relaying' are used to describe the interactions between the User, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram is labeled T1199800-98.](b8efedb73292a798b3f2050f9335cae6_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for association establishment from the SCF. Lifelines: User, CUSF, SCF. The SCF initiates the association with the CUSF using TC-BEGIN-j [initiateAssociation, requestReportBCUSMEvent]. The CUSF addresses the User with REGISTER[Facility][CRi]. The User responds with FACILITY[Facility][CRi]. The CUSF then triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF responds with TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, SendComponent]. The CUSF then relays a FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the User. This is followed by a loop of 'N times' where the User sends FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the CUSF, which triggers the SCF with TC-CONTINUE-j [componentReceived]. The SCF then sends another TC-CONTINUE-j [requestReportBCUSMEvent, SendComponent] and the CUSF relays another FACILITY[Facility][CRi] to the User. Labels 'Addressing', 'Event Reporting', and 'Relaying' are used to describe the interactions between the User, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram is labeled T1199800-98. + +**Figure 7-13/Q.1229 – Association establishment from the SCF** + +Later on, as in the first case, the User and the SCF dialogue using the Call Reference i between the User and the CUSF and the TCAP transaction j between the CUSF and the SCF. + +###### 3) *Release of an association by the User* + +Two cases need to be considered depending on the signalling message sent by the User. + +In the first case in Figure 7-14, the User releases the association (e.g. request the release of the association) sending RELEASE. On receipt of this signalling message, the CUSF sends associationReleaseRequested operation and waits for the releaseAssociation operation from the SCF. + +![Sequence diagram for association release from the User (case 1).](d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg) + +This sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between a User, a CUSF, and an SCF for association release (case 1). The User sends a RELEASE [Facility][CRi] message to the CUSF. The CUSF performs 'Event Reporting' and sends a TC-CONTINUE-j [associationReleaseRequested] message to the SCF. The SCF responds with a TC-END-j [releaseAssociation] message to the CUSF. The CUSF then performs 'Relaying' and sends a RELEASE COMPLETE [Facility][CRi] message back to the User. The diagram is labeled T1199810-98. + +Sequence diagram for association release from the User (case 1). + +**Figure 7-14/Q.1229 – Association release from the User (case 1)** + +In the second case in Figure 7-15, the User releases the association (e.g. request the release of the association) with the SCF sending RELEASE COMPLETE; the SCF can not do anything afterwards. + +![Sequence diagram for association release from the User (case 2).](91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg) + +This sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between a User, a CUSF, and an SCF for association release (case 2). The User sends a RELEASE COMPLETE [Facility][CRi] message to the CUSF. The CUSF performs 'Event Reporting' and sends a TC-END-j [associationReleaseRequested] message to the SCF. The diagram is labeled T1199820-98. + +Sequence diagram for association release from the User (case 2). + +**Figure 7-15/Q.1229 – Association release from the User (case 2)** + +###### 4) *Release of an association by the SCF* + +The SCF releases the association with the User as in Figure 7-16: + +![Sequence diagram for association release from the SCF.](5f0781dd750d507531d474aed1ff9df9_img.jpg) + +This sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between a User, a CUSF, and an SCF for association release initiated by the SCF. The SCF sends a TC-END-j [releaseAssociation] message to the CUSF. The CUSF performs 'Relaying' and sends a RELEASE COMPLETE [Facility][CRi] message to the User. The diagram is labeled T1199830-98. + +Sequence diagram for association release from the SCF. + +**Figure 7-16/Q.1229 – Association release from the SCF** + +##### 7.2.3.2.2 CUSF procedures + +At the CUSF level, as indicated in the previous example, two different kinds of CUSF procedures should be defined: the first ones correspond to the initiation of a call unrelated "User-SCF" dialogue while the second ones correspond to the relay of information between the User and the SCF during an existing call unrelated "User-SCF" dialogue. + +In the "User to SCF" direction, the CUSF procedure instantiating the call unrelated "User-SCF" dialogue is denoted the "triggering" procedure. In the reverse direction, it is denoted the "addressing" procedure: + +- The addressing procedure consists in a correspondence between the Called Party Number and the targeted line identity. +- The triggering procedure consists in the analysis of the triggering criteria which may be a line-based criteria or a criteria embedded within the Facility IE received from the User. + +In the "User to SCF" direction, the CUSF procedure relaying the information during an existing call unrelated "User-SCF" dialogue is denoted the "event reporting" procedure. In the reverse direction, it is denoted the "relaying" procedure. These procedures just ensure the relay of information between the User and the SCF. This relay might be fully transparent. + +#### 7.2.3.3 Security guidelines for Out-Channel Call Related User Interaction + +##### 7.2.3.3.1 Limitation of usage of SS7 signalling capabilities + +In order to protect the ISDN network signalling system from being overloaded with user-to-service and service-to-user signalling: + +- the maximum size of the User-to-service Interaction/Service-to-user Interaction (UTSI/STUI) data containers shall be limited; +- the rate of user-to-service signalling events shall be limited in the local exchanges; and +- the rate of service-to-user signalling events shall be limited in the SSPs. + +In the case where the user terminal violates these limitations, the local exchange shall ignore the UTSI information element and in the case where the SCP violates these limitations, the SSP shall ignore the STUI information element. + +##### 7.2.3.3.2 Prevention of UTSI-feature usage by unauthorized users + +The local exchange shall accept an UTSI information element in the following cases only: + +###### 1) *Call-related signalling* + +The local exchange shall accept an UTSI information element in a call-related signalling message if: + +- UTSI signalling is carried in a basic call control message; +- UTSI signalling is not carried in a basic call control message (e.g. FACILITY message) but has been explicitly allowed by an IN service logic for that particular call via INAP/ISUP signalling, + +the latter capability may require additional ISUP signalling in forward and backward direction. + +###### 2) *Call-unrelated signalling* + +The local exchanges shall accept an UTSI information element in a call-unrelated signalling message, if: + +- UTSI signalling is allowed according to access subscription. + +NOTE – In a particular network, the network operator may decide to allow call-unrelated UTSI signalling for every subscribed access. Such a decision may depend on charging decisions. + +In all other cases, the local exchanges shall ignore the UTSI signalling. + +The local exchange shall ignore any STUI signalling, if received from the user side. + +#### **7.2.3.4 Guideline for the use of advanced SCF-SDF searching and information modelling mechanism** + +##### **7.2.3.4.1 Advanced SCF-SDF searching and information modelling mechanisms** + +The SCF-SDF interface is an agreed internetworking interface in IN CS-2, as in IN CS-1. The overall performance of IN service implementations will be heavily influenced by data performance and access performance. A number of factors will influence performance; however, a key determinant will be the number of protocol messages that are required over the SCF-SDF interface, particularly in the case of services which must support international roaming, where message delays can be very significant. + +Performance will also be affected by the data structuring and whether there is a need to maintain data consistency. For example, where data is logically shared between different parts of a data hierarchy, there must be mechanisms to either locate the data in one place or to ensure that the data is set to the same value in each place. + +To optimize the database with respect to these parameters requires intelligent use of the sophisticated searching and information modelling features of the SCF-SDF interface, as described in 7.2/Q.1228. These mechanisms include: + +- aliases; +- multi-valued attributes; +- collective attributes; +- extensible matching rules; +- attribute contexts; +- entry methods. + +###### **1) *Aliases*** + +Aliases are entries that point to other entries in the database. An alias is used to provide alternative names for an object. This can be used to implement a consistent many-to-one mapping. The use of aliases has the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- Aliases can be used to refer to entries which contain data common to many parts of the hierarchy, for example, number translation tables common to many service users. Data consistency is easily maintained. +- Information models which are not strictly hierarchical can be represented in a hierarchy using aliases. + +###### **2) *Multi-valued attributes*** + +Attributes of an entry, other than naming attributes, can have more than one value. This can be used to create a consistent many-to-one mapping. For example, consider an entry that represents a geographical region, and has an attribute which represents a valid calling line prefix for that area. If this region has more than one valid calling line prefix, then the calling line prefix attribute can have more than one value. A search on this attribute using any of the valid calling line prefixes will result in the correct data being returned. The use of multi-valued attributes has the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- Less physical space is likely to be required to store a list of information using a multi-valued attribute than by using a set of subordinate entries. Sets of subordinate entries require naming, access control and other data to be stored for each element of the set. +- Multi-dimensional lists cannot be implemented with multi-valued attributes. +- Values within a multi-valued attribute cannot be shared between two instances of the attribute. Therefore data consistency may not be maintained. + +###### 3) *Collective attributes* + +A collective attribute is an attribute that is common to all entries in a subtree. Collective attributes can be used to minimize the number of database accesses required to complete a complex search which must satisfy a number of search criteria at different levels in the hierarchy. For example, "locate all entries of type X with attribute $A \geq 1$ and whose parent has attribute $B \leq 2$ ". If the parent entry's attributes are made collective, and thus visible to the child entry, the search may be performed in one operation. Otherwise, searching the different levels of the hierarchy requires multiple searches. The use of collective attributes has the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- Multiple searches down through a hierarchy can be compressed into one search. +- Subtree searches involving collective attributes may involve many, many entries and hence incur a significant performance penalty. + +###### 4) *Extensible matching rules* + +Along with the built-in matching rules, the IN CS-2 SCF-SDF interface allows schema designers to add new matching rules to attribute types. Two applications of this mechanism are immediately obvious. The first is to search on components within structured attributes. For instance, an attribute may be of a user-defined type which contains both a user-name and password. A search may be required to match on an entry that has a given user-name only. A new matching rule can then be defined that compares only the user-name field. + +Secondly, this mechanism allows an attribute to be defined in a number of different ways, such as time being defined as Greenwich mean time or local time. + +The use of extensible matching rules has the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- The schema designer has the flexibility to introduce new types and (re)define the matching rules accordingly. +- Matching rules only apply to search criteria and cannot be used for further customization. + +###### 5) *Attribute contexts* + +An attribute context is information that can be attached to an attribute to define the validity of a attribute value. An attribute context is very similar to an attribute, having both a type and a value. Attributes which contain attribute contexts are by nature multi-valued. + +A request, either directly or as part of a search criteria, to an attribute containing one or more contexts is handled in the following manner. If no context is provided, the SDF returns a value for the attribute based upon some hidden context specific algorithm. If a context is provided, in the form of a list of context values, then the SDF tries to find an attribute value that has the same value for its context. + +The most useful example of an attribute context is that of a lifetime of an attribute. Others include a language context for announcement information. The use of attribute contexts has the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- Attribute contexts can make search criteria much simpler. +- Attribute contexts allow the schema designer an enhanced level of customization, although still on an attribute basis. + +###### 6) *Entry methods* + +Entry methods enable complex data manipulation at the SCF-SDF interface to be performed in a single database operation. Instead of many complicated database operations, a message is passed that contains all the input parameters to an entry in the hierarchy. The internal operations are then performed at the SDF including any logic required to link the operations together. The output values are then passed back to the SCF. The use of entry methods have the following advantages and disadvantages: + +- The number of external database accesses is greatly reduced. +- The exact logic of the SDF operation is hidden, enabling service providers firstly to provide service differentiation whilst retaining a common interface, and secondly to provide smooth evolution of services. +- Interworking with non-IN and private network databases may become easier. +- Data privacy and security may be enhanced by appropriate hiding of the information model behind the interface method. + +##### 7.2.3.4.2 Service example + +This subclause illustrates how advanced searching and information modelling mechanisms can be applied to a complex service. A number of scenarios are described as follows: + +- The first is a simple non-optimized implementation. +- The second implementation minimizes the number of database accesses through use of advanced SCF-SDF searching and information modelling mechanisms, simplified algorithms and by making some assumptions on how the data is to be used. These assumptions may result in replicated data and the imposing of some limitations on how the data is described. +- The third implementation maximizes flexibility in defining service data, removes duplication of data, and removes the limitations of the second implementation. Despite the use of advanced searching and information modelling mechanisms, the number of database accesses remains large. +- The fourth implementation makes use of entry methods to minimize the number of database accesses, maximize the flexibility of data entry, and removes the limitations of the second implementation. + +The four alternatives listed here are not the only options available, but provide an illustration of how and when to use the advanced searching and information modelling mechanisms. + +###### 7.2.3.4.2.1 The example service + +The service we wish to implement involves the routing of a call based upon the calling line identity, time-of-day, day-of-week, percentage call distribution and multiple call destinations for busy outgoing lines. There are six steps to translate the number as follows: + +- 1) Selection of a calling region using the A and B party numbers. +- 2) Selection of a day-of-week for the selected region. +- 3) Selection of a time-of-day for the selected day-of-week. +- 4) Selection of a destination end point, using a percentage call distribution (splay), for the selected time-of-day. +- 5) Retrieval of two outgoing numbers for the selected destination. +- 6) A call attempt to the first number. If this call fails, a second call attempt to the second number. + +A simple decision tree for an instance of this service is illustrated in Figure 7-17. + +![A decision tree diagram for a service example. It starts with 'Start' leading to 'CLI'. The 'CLI' node has three branches: '123-7890 123-4567', '234-8123', and 'Other'. Each branch leads to a 'Day Of Week' node. The 'Day Of Week' nodes have branches: 'Mon & Sat', 'Tues', 'Sun', and 'Other'. Each of these leads to a 'Time Of Day' node. The 'Time Of Day' nodes have branches: '9 am-5 pm', 'Other', and 'Always'. Each of these leads to a 'Percentage of Calls' node. The 'Percentage of Calls' nodes have branches: '10%', '90%', '50%', and '50%'. Each of these leads to a terminal node containing two phone numbers. The terminal nodes are: '111-6789 111-6788' and '345-1111 568-1234'. A small code 'T1199840-98' is at the bottom right.](e9f6a9e6beb9ae97b392bf38b93ad748_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([Start]) --> CLI{CLI} + CLI -- "123-7890 +123-4567" --> DOW1{Day Of Week} + CLI -- "234-8123" --> DOW2{Day Of Week} + CLI -- "Other" --> DOW3{Day Of Week} + DOW1 -- "Mon & Sat" --> TOD1{Time Of Day} + DOW1 -- "Other" --> DOW4{Day Of Week} + DOW2 -- "Tues" --> TOD2{Time Of Day} + DOW2 -- "Other" --> DOW5{Day Of Week} + DOW3 -- "Sun" --> TOD3{Time Of Day} + DOW3 -- "Other" --> DOW6{Day Of Week} + TOD1 -- "9 am-5 pm" --> POC1{Percentage of Calls} + TOD1 -- "Other" --> POC2{Percentage of Calls} + TOD2 -- "Always" --> POC3{Percentage of Calls} + TOD2 -- "Other" --> POC4{Percentage of Calls} + TOD3 -- "9 am-5 pm" --> POC5{Percentage of Calls} + TOD3 -- "Other" --> POC6{Percentage of Calls} + POC1 -- "10%" --> T1[111-6789 +111-6788] + POC1 -- "90%" --> T2[345-1111 +568-1234] + POC2 -- "10%" --> T1 + POC2 -- "90%" --> T2 + POC3 -- "50%" --> T1 + POC3 -- "50%" --> T2 + POC4 -- "50%" --> T1 + POC4 -- "50%" --> T2 + POC5 -- "50%" --> T1 + POC5 -- "50%" --> T2 + POC6 -- "50%" --> T1 + POC6 -- "50%" --> T2 + T1 --- T119984098[T1199840-98] + T2 --- T119984098 + +``` + +A decision tree diagram for a service example. It starts with 'Start' leading to 'CLI'. The 'CLI' node has three branches: '123-7890 123-4567', '234-8123', and 'Other'. Each branch leads to a 'Day Of Week' node. The 'Day Of Week' nodes have branches: 'Mon & Sat', 'Tues', 'Sun', and 'Other'. Each of these leads to a 'Time Of Day' node. The 'Time Of Day' nodes have branches: '9 am-5 pm', 'Other', and 'Always'. Each of these leads to a 'Percentage of Calls' node. The 'Percentage of Calls' nodes have branches: '10%', '90%', '50%', and '50%'. Each of these leads to a terminal node containing two phone numbers. The terminal nodes are: '111-6789 111-6788' and '345-1111 568-1234'. A small code 'T1199840-98' is at the bottom right. + +Figure 7-17/Q.1229 – Decision tree for service example + +Depending on the implementation, some of these steps may be performed in a single operation, or in multiple operations. + +###### 7.2.3.4.2.2 A Simple implementation + +In this solution we ignore the possibility of using advanced searching information modelling mechanisms, and use only the guidelines set out in Appendix II/Q.1218. The data schema will be discussed in the order in which it would be designed; the complete schema is illustrated in Figure 7-18. Likewise, the complete information flows are shown in Figure 7-18. In this implementation we will create an entry for each customer using this service. This object class is labelled "Customer". The naming attributes of Customer include a service identifier ("Service") and the dialled number ("BNumber"). + +The translation of a Calling Line Identity (CLI) to a region can be implemented by comparing a CLI to a list of entries of object class "MapE" that have both a "CLI" attribute and a "Region" attribute. MapE entries are placed below the Customer entry in the schema as shown in Figure 7-18. This would enable the SCF to interrogate the SDF using a standard one-level search (refer to the first information flow in Figure 7-19). + + + +![Sequence diagram showing information flow between SCF and SDF for service using simple searching mechanisms. The diagram consists of three search-return cycles. Cycle 1: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B, For CLI=APartyNumber) to SDF; SDF returns Region. Cycle 2: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B / Region=region / Day=today, For StartTime < CurrentTime, StopTime > CurrentTime) to SDF; SDF returns TimeId. Cycle 3: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B / Region=region / Day=today / Time=timeId, For StartPercent < NumCalls, StopPercent > NumCalls) to SDF; SDF returns TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy. Brackets on the right side group the messages with their functional descriptions: 'Customer, CLI → Region', 'Region, Day, CurrentTimer → TODEntry', and 'TODEntry, NumberOfCalls → TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy'. A small code 'T1199860-98' is at the bottom right.](5e05915b2a93a3b404422e0966a7c924_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCF + participant SDF + Note right of SDF: Customer, CLI → Region + SCF->>SDF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B +For +CLI = APartyNumber + SDF-->>SCF: Return +Region + Note right of SDF: Region, Day, CurrentTimer → TODEntry + SCF->>SDF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B / +Region=region / +Day=today +For +StartTime < CurrentTime, +StopTime > CurrentTime + SDF-->>SCF: Return +TimeId + Note right of SDF: TODEntry, NumberOfCalls → TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy + SCF->>SDF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B / +Region=region / +Day=today / +Time=timeId +For +StartPercent < NumCalls, +StopPercent > NumCalls + SDF-->>SCF: Return +TranslatedNumber, +NumberOnBusy + +``` + +T1199860-98 + +Sequence diagram showing information flow between SCF and SDF for service using simple searching mechanisms. The diagram consists of three search-return cycles. Cycle 1: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B, For CLI=APartyNumber) to SDF; SDF returns Region. Cycle 2: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B / Region=region / Day=today, For StartTime < CurrentTime, StopTime > CurrentTime) to SDF; SDF returns TimeId. Cycle 3: SCF sends Search (Service=S, BNumber=B / Region=region / Day=today / Time=timeId, For StartPercent < NumCalls, StopPercent > NumCalls) to SDF; SDF returns TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy. Brackets on the right side group the messages with their functional descriptions: 'Customer, CLI → Region', 'Region, Day, CurrentTimer → TODEntry', and 'TODEntry, NumberOfCalls → TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy'. A small code 'T1199860-98' is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-19/Q.1229 – Information flow diagram for service using simple searching mechanisms** + +Figure 7-19 assumes the distinguished name of the Customer entry is "Service = S BNumber = B", where B is the called number. Once the service has been triggered, an INAP message is sent from the SCF to the SDF containing a bind and this first search operation. This search operation translates the calling line identity (CLI) to a region. The region is then used with the service, B-number, day-of-week and current time to return a reference to a time-of-day entry. A subsequent search translates the number of calls to the translated number and alternate number. The total number of database requests for this service, ignoring binds and unbinds, is three. + +###### 7.2.3.4.2.3 Using advanced mechanisms to minimize database accesses + +In this implementation we make use of the advanced searching and information modelling mechanisms to minimize the number of database access. The solution uses the same assumptions made in the previous implementation. + +The first step of translating the CLI to a region is simplified through the use a multi-valued attribute. Instead of two classes, CLI and Locality, a single Locality object class is created with a multi-valued CLI attribute. This enables each Locality entry to be identified by more than CLI using a search operation. This has the added effect of maintaining referential integrity between the CLI and the locality. + +The use of a multi-valued CLI list also enables all of the parameters required for the translation, namely the CLI, the time-of-day, day-of-week and percentage of calls, to exist in the superiors of the entry that contains the two translated numbers. If all of these parameters are made collective attributes, then they theoretically exist in the entry at the bottom of the hierarchy. This means a single search operation can be used to identify the final entry. Although this greatly reduces the number of database accesses, it would most likely increase the access time, since the search would be performed on all entries in the subtree below the "Customer" entry. + +The data schema is shown in Figure 7-20 while the information flow diagram for this implementation is shown in Figure 7-21. + +![Figure 7-20: Call routing service information model using multi-valued and collective attributes. The diagram shows a hierarchical tree structure with five nodes: Customer, Locality, DOWE, TODE, and SplayF. Customer has attribute Service-BNumber-. Locality has attributes CLI+* and Region-. DOWE has attribute Day*-. TODE has attributes StartTime* and StopTime*. SplayF has attributes StartPercent, StopPercent, TranslatedNumber, and NumberOnBusy. A reference T1199870-98 is shown below SplayF. A legend defines the symbols: * Collective Attribute, + Multi Valued Attribute, - Naming Attribute.](37806e0fc150d857046ebc7e47893d7a_img.jpg) + +Customer Service-BNumber- + +Locality CLI+\* Region- + +DOWE Day\*- + +TODE StartTime\* StopTime\* + +SplayF StartPercent StopPercent TranslatedNumber NumberOnBusy + +T1199870-98 + +\* Collective Attribute ++ Multi Valued Attribute +- Naming Attribute + +Figure 7-20: Call routing service information model using multi-valued and collective attributes. The diagram shows a hierarchical tree structure with five nodes: Customer, Locality, DOWE, TODE, and SplayF. Customer has attribute Service-BNumber-. Locality has attributes CLI+\* and Region-. DOWE has attribute Day\*-. TODE has attributes StartTime\* and StopTime\*. SplayF has attributes StartPercent, StopPercent, TranslatedNumber, and NumberOnBusy. A reference T1199870-98 is shown below SplayF. A legend defines the symbols: \* Collective Attribute, + Multi Valued Attribute, - Naming Attribute. + +**Figure 7-20/Q.1229 – Call routing service information model using multi-valued and collective attributes** + +![Figure 7-21: Information flow diagram for service using multi-valued and collective attributes. The diagram shows a sequence of messages between SCF and SDF. SCF sends a Search message with Service=S and BNumber=B. It then enters a For loop with conditions: CLI = APartyNumber, Day = Today, StartTime < CurrentTime, StopTime > CurrentTime, StartPercent < NumCalls, and StopPercent > NumCalls. After the loop, SCF sends a return message with TranslatedNumber and NumberOnBusy. A bracket on the right side of the diagram labels the search and loop section as 'Entire search operation'. A reference T1199880-98 is shown at the bottom right.](18d7d8de298d79e7bc87af5217f11203_img.jpg) + +SCF SDF + +Search +Service=S BNumber=B + +For +CLI = APartyNumber, +Day = Today, +StartTime < CurrentTime, +StopTime > CurrentTime, +StartPercent < NumCalls, +StopPercent > NumCalls + +return +TranslatedNumber, +NumberOnBusy + +Entire search operation + +T1199880-98 + +Figure 7-21: Information flow diagram for service using multi-valued and collective attributes. The diagram shows a sequence of messages between SCF and SDF. SCF sends a Search message with Service=S and BNumber=B. It then enters a For loop with conditions: CLI = APartyNumber, Day = Today, StartTime < CurrentTime, StopTime > CurrentTime, StartPercent < NumCalls, and StopPercent > NumCalls. After the loop, SCF sends a return message with TranslatedNumber and NumberOnBusy. A bracket on the right side of the diagram labels the search and loop section as 'Entire search operation'. A reference T1199880-98 is shown at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-21/Q.1229 – Information flow diagram for service using multi-valued and collective attributes** + +The total number of database requests for this service, ignoring binds and unbinds, is one. + +###### 7.2.3.4.2.4 A solution to maximize flexibility + +Customer requirements are such that they expect more flexibility than the assumptions imposed on them in the two previous implementations. The following improvements may need to be made to the service: + +- The algorithm for distributing calls based on a percentage distribution needs to ensure that calls are distributed according to the specification even for very small numbers of calls. +- The data for day-of-week routing needs to be more flexible so that both general terms, such as every Monday, and specific terms, such as Monday the eighth of January 1996, can be defined. +- The data for time-of-day routing likewise needs to handle both general rules and exceptions to the rules. +- Due to the large amounts of memory and cost of defining complete CLI-to-region maps, maps should be shared between customers wherever possible. +- Day-of-week entries need to be able to be shared between different localities. +- Time-of-day entries need to be able to be shared between different day-of-week entries. +- Percentage routing parameters need to be able to be shared between different time-of-day entries. +- Numbers lists need to be shared between routing destinations. + +Figure 7-22 illustrates the data model of a solution that satisfies these requirements. + +![Information model diagram for maximum flexibility](64323b705244afc70bf77babdacb6ce5_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates an information model for maximum flexibility. At the top is a 'Root' node. Below it are two nodes: 'Map' and 'Customer'. The 'Map' node is connected to 'MapE' and 'MapF'. The 'Customer' node is connected to 'MapF', 'CnumF', 'DOWF', 'SplayF', and 'TODF'. Below 'MapE' is 'MapA'. Below 'MapF' is 'Locality'. Below 'CnumF' is 'DOWE'. Below 'DOWF' is 'SpecE'. Below 'SplayF' is 'TODE'. Below 'TODF' is 'TODE'. There are two thick black arrows: one from 'MapA' to 'Map' and another from 'Locality' to 'DOWF'. A small text 'T1199890-98' is at the bottom right. + +Information model diagram for maximum flexibility + +**Figure 7-22/Q.1229 – Information model for maximum flexibility** + +In this example each set of rules, or feature, such as time-of-day routing can be shared as outputs from other features. This means that each feature has to be translated one at a time. The first five steps listed in 7.2.3.4.2.1 are performed as separate sequential operations with the output of each + +being used in subsequent operations. These five steps are listed in the following subclauses. All use the schema defined in Figure 7-22. The schema diagrams used in the following subclauses are more detailed diagrams of portions of Figure 7-22 with additional attribute information. + +Figure 7-23 shows in more detail the schema used in translating the A party number to a region. Figure 7-24 shows the information flows used to implement the operation. + +![Figure 7-23: Information model to translate the CLI to a region. This is an Entity-Relationship diagram. At the top, an oval labeled 'Root' is connected to two ovals below it: 'Map' on the left and 'Customer' on the right. The 'Customer' oval has an attribute 'Service-BNumber-' next to it. Below the 'Map' oval is an oval labeled 'MapE', which has an attribute 'CLI Region' next to it. Below the 'Customer' oval is an oval labeled 'MapF', which has an attribute 'Feature-' next to it. Below 'MapE' and 'MapF' is an oval labeled 'MapA', which has an attribute 'MapId-' next to it. A thick black line connects 'MapA' to 'Map'. A thin line connects 'MapF' to 'MapA'. A small code 'T1199900-98' is at the bottom.](4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-23: Information model to translate the CLI to a region. This is an Entity-Relationship diagram. At the top, an oval labeled 'Root' is connected to two ovals below it: 'Map' on the left and 'Customer' on the right. The 'Customer' oval has an attribute 'Service-BNumber-' next to it. Below the 'Map' oval is an oval labeled 'MapE', which has an attribute 'CLI Region' next to it. Below the 'Customer' oval is an oval labeled 'MapF', which has an attribute 'Feature-' next to it. Below 'MapE' and 'MapF' is an oval labeled 'MapA', which has an attribute 'MapId-' next to it. A thick black line connects 'MapA' to 'Map'. A thin line connects 'MapF' to 'MapA'. A small code 'T1199900-98' is at the bottom. + +**Figure 7-23/Q.1229 – Information model to translate the CLI to a region** + +![Figure 7-24: Information flows used to translate the CLI to a region. This is a sequence diagram with two lifelines: 'SCF' on the left and 'SDF' on the right. The sequence of messages is: 1. SCF sends a 'Search' message to SDF with parameters 'Service=S BNumber=B / Feature=Map / MapId=1'. 2. SCF sends a 'For' message to SDF with parameter 'CLI=APartyNumber'. 3. SDF sends a 'Return' message back to SCF with parameter 'Region'. A small code 'T1199910-98' is at the bottom right.](4dd5f00d74e7db5bbb2d011609bcc43d_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-24: Information flows used to translate the CLI to a region. This is a sequence diagram with two lifelines: 'SCF' on the left and 'SDF' on the right. The sequence of messages is: 1. SCF sends a 'Search' message to SDF with parameters 'Service=S BNumber=B / Feature=Map / MapId=1'. 2. SCF sends a 'For' message to SDF with parameter 'CLI=APartyNumber'. 3. SDF sends a 'Return' message back to SCF with parameter 'Region'. A small code 'T1199910-98' is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-24/Q.1229 – Information flows used to translate the CLI to a region** + +The information flow diagram does not include the bind. In this example the Customer naming attribute is once again "Service = S BNumber = B". Each customer has an alias to a shared CLI map. The region associated with the Map entry is returned if the search is successful. + +Once the region is retrieved from the maps, the day-of-week information is retrieved by using the appropriate region alias entry listed with the map feature: the current day needs to be translated to a time-of-day feature. The process of retrieving the region first, followed by the day-of-week information, is required because the map information is shared between many customers. By using an OR in the filter, the current day can be compared to a list of weekday entries and a list of special days in the one search. Note that the lists could also be stored as a multi-valued attributes with application contexts instead of a list of subordinate entries. Figure 7-25 below shows in more detail the schema used in this operation. Figure 7-26 shows the information flows used to implement the operation. + +![Figure 7-25: Information model used to select the day-of-week. This is an Entity-Relationship diagram showing a hierarchy of entities. At the top is 'Root', which connects to 'Customer' (with attribute 'Service-BNumber-'). 'Customer' connects to 'MapF' (with attribute 'Feature-') and 'DOWF' (with attribute 'Feature-'). 'MapF' connects to 'Locality' (with attribute 'Region-'). 'DOWF' connects to 'Locality', 'DOWE' (with attribute 'WeekDay TimeFeature'), and 'SpecE' (with attribute 'SpecialDay TimeFeature'). A thick black arrow points from 'Locality' to 'DOWF'. A small code 'T1199920-98' is in the bottom right corner.](856f6b5a43a3ca2bf49b8446412dc6ae_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-25: Information model used to select the day-of-week. This is an Entity-Relationship diagram showing a hierarchy of entities. At the top is 'Root', which connects to 'Customer' (with attribute 'Service-BNumber-'). 'Customer' connects to 'MapF' (with attribute 'Feature-') and 'DOWF' (with attribute 'Feature-'). 'MapF' connects to 'Locality' (with attribute 'Region-'). 'DOWF' connects to 'Locality', 'DOWE' (with attribute 'WeekDay TimeFeature'), and 'SpecE' (with attribute 'SpecialDay TimeFeature'). A thick black arrow points from 'Locality' to 'DOWF'. A small code 'T1199920-98' is in the bottom right corner. + +Figure 7-25/Q.1229 – Information model used to select the day-of-week + +![Figure 7-26: Information flows used to select the day-of-week. This is a sequence diagram between two lifelines, SCF and SDF. SCF sends a 'Search' message to SDF with parameters: Service= S BNumber=B /, Feature=Map /, Region=region. SCF then sends a 'For' message with parameters: WeekDay = Friday or, SpecialDay = 19/10/1995. SDF returns a 'Return' message with parameter: TimeFeature. A small code 'T1199930-98' is in the bottom right corner.](5cf80bac69830ea773ac17c87e0ae24d_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-26: Information flows used to select the day-of-week. This is a sequence diagram between two lifelines, SCF and SDF. SCF sends a 'Search' message to SDF with parameters: Service= S BNumber=B /, Feature=Map /, Region=region. SCF then sends a 'For' message with parameters: WeekDay = Friday or, SpecialDay = 19/10/1995. SDF returns a 'Return' message with parameter: TimeFeature. A small code 'T1199930-98' is in the bottom right corner. + +Figure 7-26/Q.1229 – Information flows used to select the day-of-week + +The translation from the time-of-day to a splay feature is a straightforward comparison between the current time and a list of time-of-day entries. As with the day-of-week list, the time-of-day list could use multi-valued attributes with application contexts instead of a list of subordinate entries. Figure 7-27 shows in more detail the schema used in this operation. Figure 7-28 shows the information flows used to implement the operation. + +![Figure 7-27: Information model diagram showing a hierarchy of entities. Root is connected to Customer (with attribute Service-BNumber-). Customer is connected to TODF (with attribute Feature-). TODF is connected to TODE (with attribute SplayFeature). A small label T1199940-98 is at the bottom right.](dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Root((Root)) --- Customer((Customer +Service-BNumber-)) + Customer --- TODF((TODF +Feature-)) + TODF --- TODE((TODE +SplayFeature)) + TODE --- T1199940-98[T1199940-98] + +``` + +Figure 7-27: Information model diagram showing a hierarchy of entities. Root is connected to Customer (with attribute Service-BNumber-). Customer is connected to TODF (with attribute Feature-). TODF is connected to TODE (with attribute SplayFeature). A small label T1199940-98 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-27/Q.1229 – Information model used to translate the time to a splay feature** + +![Figure 7-28: Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF. SCF sends a Search message to SDF with parameters Service=S, BNumber=B, Feature=Time. SCF sends a For message to SDF with conditions StartTime ≤ '10:00' and StopTime ≥ '10:00'. SDF returns a Return message to SCF with parameter SplayFeature. A small label T1199950-98 is at the bottom right.](750b1652a4f4791b84c02aa755a1dedd_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCF + participant SDF + Note left of SCF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B / +Feature=Time +For +StartTime ≤ "10:00" and +StopTime ≥ "10:00" + SCF->>SDF: Search + Note left of SCF: Return +SplayFeature + SDF-->>SCF: Return + T1199950-98[T1199950-98] + +``` + +Figure 7-28: Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF. SCF sends a Search message to SDF with parameters Service=S, BNumber=B, Feature=Time. SCF sends a For message to SDF with conditions StartTime ≤ '10:00' and StopTime ≥ '10:00'. SDF returns a Return message to SCF with parameter SplayFeature. A small label T1199950-98 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-28/Q.1229 – Information flows used to translate the time to a splay feature** + +In this implementation, calls are distributed based upon the number of calls using the selected splay entry. Each splay entry has a fixed number of splay destinations. For each destination it lists a required percentage of the number of calls to be made to that destination, the name of the C-number entry (CNumF) that the calls are to be distributed to, and actual number of calls that have been distributed to that entry. To select the appropriate destination, the SCF must retrieve all of the + +splaying information and execute the splaying algorithm (in the SCF). Once this has been done, the number of calls to that destination is incremented. The "TranslatedNumber" and "NumberOnBusy" are then retrieved from the selected CNumF entry. Figure 7-29 shows in more detail the schema used in this operation. Figure 7-30 shows the information flows used to implement the operation. + +![Figure 7-29: Information model diagram showing Root connected to Customer (Service-BNumber-), which is connected to CNumF (Feature-) and SplayF (Feature-).](f4fdce3ce1c0fd291f31813f83d0d0d3_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Root((Root)) --- Customer((Customer)) + Customer --- CNumF((CNumF)) + Customer --- SplayF((SplayF)) + Customer -.-> ServiceBNumber[Service-BNumber-] + CNumF -.-> FeatureC[Feature-] + SplayF -.-> FeatureS[Feature-] + T1199960-98 + +``` + +Figure 7-29: Information model diagram showing Root connected to Customer (Service-BNumber-), which is connected to CNumF (Feature-) and SplayF (Feature-). + +**Figure 7-29/Q.1229 – Information model used to distribute calls based on percentage distribution** + +![Figure 7-30: Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF. The sequence includes Search, Return, Modify, Return, Search, and Return messages. A bracket on the SDF side groups the Modify and Return messages with the text 'Increment number of calls'.](f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCF + participant SDF + Note left of SCF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B / +Feature=Splay + SCF->>SDF: + Note right of SDF: Return +SplayCounters, CNumFeatures + SDF-->>SCF: + Note left of SCF: Modify +Service=S BNumber=B / +Feature=Splay +Increment +SplayCounter1 + Note right of SDF: Increment number of calls + SDF-->>SCF: + Note left of SCF: Search +Service=S BNumber=B / +Feature=CNum + SCF->>SDF: + Note right of SDF: Return +TranslatedNumber, +NumberOnBusy + SDF-->>SCF: + T1199970-98 + +``` + +Figure 7-30: Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF. The sequence includes Search, Return, Modify, Return, Search, and Return messages. A bracket on the SDF side groups the Modify and Return messages with the text 'Increment number of calls'. + +**Figure 7-30/Q.1229 – Information flows used to used to distribute calls based on percentage distribution** + +The total number of database requests for this service, ignoring binds and unbinds, is six. + +###### 7.2.3.4.2.5 Using entry methods + +The number of database operations required to implement a service with reasonably complex data manipulations can become excessively large (refer to the above subclause). If, however, entry methods are used, the number of external database operations falls to just one while still retaining all of the data complexity. Figure 7-31 shows the data model, as seen external to the SDF, for the example flexible call routing service. + +![Diagram showing a 'Customer' object-class with a 'Route' method. The method takes 'CLI, current Time' as input and returns 'TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy'. A reference code 'T11100700-98' is shown below the diagram.](3750b0149a6380885998ab3ca6a8787c_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows an oval labeled "Customer". To its right, the text "TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy" and "Route(CLI, current Time)" are displayed. Below the oval, the code "T11100700-98" is written. + +Diagram showing a 'Customer' object-class with a 'Route' method. The method takes 'CLI, current Time' as input and returns 'TranslatedNumber, NumberOnBusy'. A reference code 'T11100700-98' is shown below the diagram. + +**Figure 7-31/Q.1229 – Alternative information model** + +This can be described using the following ASN.1 notation: + +**SupportedMethods METHOD ::= { Route | ... }** + +``` +Route METHOD ::= { + INPUT ATTRIBUTE CLIInfo + OUTPUT ATTRIBUTE SelectedNumbers + ID route-opcode +} +CLIInfo ::= SEQUENCE { + cli-prefix DigitString + current-time DateAndTime +} +SelectedNumbers ::= SEQUENCE { + TranslatedNumber DigitString + NumberOnBusy DigitString +} +``` + +In this example the "Customer" object-class has a method named "Route" which includes all of the operations shown in the previous implementation. This method takes as its input a CLI and the current time [currentTime]. It then returns a TranslatedNumber and NumberOnBusy. Figure 7-32 shows the single SCF-SDF information flow used to execute the method for an instance of Customer in the directory information tree where the name of the entry is "Service=S BNumber=B". + +![Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF for a sample service. The SCF sends an 'Execute' message to the SDF with parameters Service=S, BNumber=B, Method=Route, and With (CLI=ANumber, CurrentTime=now). The SDF returns 'TranslatedNumber' and 'NumberOnBusy'. A bracket on the right side of the diagram labels the entire interaction as 'Entire search operation'. The diagram is labeled T1199980-98 at the bottom right.](401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCF + participant SDF + Note right of SDF: Entire search operation + SCF->>SDF: Execute +Service=S BNumber=B +Method +Route +With +CLI = ANumber, +CurrentTime = now + SDF-->>SCF: Return +TranslatedNumber +NumberOnBusy + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SDF for a sample service. The SCF sends an 'Execute' message to the SDF with parameters Service=S, BNumber=B, Method=Route, and With (CLI=ANumber, CurrentTime=now). The SDF returns 'TranslatedNumber' and 'NumberOnBusy'. A bracket on the right side of the diagram labels the entire interaction as 'Entire search operation'. The diagram is labeled T1199980-98 at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-32/Q.1229 – Information flows used to implement sample service** + +The total number of database requests for this service, ignoring binds and unbinds, is one. + +#### 7.2.3.5 Generic METHOD to assign a unique value of a pool of resources + +##### 7.2.3.5.1 Background + +It is common in telecommunications to have a protocol to access to a resource distinct from the protocol to use to operate it. The protocol to access a resource is often a reservation. Sometimes, the reservation could be based on the state of a network or of a service. But in a number of situations, the reservation is based on a simple stated allocated/non-allocated. In these cases, the reservation could be done by linking two data (resource identity, user identity). + +In principle, an idle resource could be taken only by one user and sometimes, for security, the selected resource has to be unpredictable (e.g. random selection). + +Then, in Intelligent Network, there is a need to get an atomic mechanism to allocate (uniquely and temporarily) a resource (number/identity) to a user/terminal. + +There are two well-known such situations with mobile services: + +- allocation of a temporary identity at location updating (or at each call set-up) to preserve the anonymity of the user/terminal; +- allocation of a roaming number on a per call basis, which can serve both as a unique user identity and as a routing address to the current location. + +##### 7.2.3.5.2 Solutions + +A reservation procedure is divided in two stages: + +- Make the reservation. +- Free the reservation. + +The first stage could be seen as two steps: + +- Find an idle value. +- Link this value to the user. + +There are several solutions. + +###### 1) *Reservation done by the SCF* + +A solution could have been to do the procedures of selection-assignment/find-release in the Service Logic Program Instance in the SCF and stored the assigned values in the SDF. But this solution has many drawbacks: + +- a) The SCF manages data that it does not own. +- b) The data related to the reservation associate a resource to a user during a period of time which goes beyond the duration of a Service Logic Program Instance. +- c) The Information Flows which seem simple become very complex when the error cases and the concurrency of the allocations are taken into account. +- d) The consumed bandwidth to correctly achieve this procedure from a SCF is not to be neglected. +- e) In term of Service Logic, the SCF is only concerned to get the allocated values with the necessary properties (e.g. unicity, range). A value by itself like the memory address where it is stored is meaningless for the SCF; that the selected value was "123" or "321" has no impact on the SL. +- f) The SCFs which need allocated data are generally in other networks but have to go by a unique SCF of the network which will provide the resource + +###### 2) *Reservation done by the SDF* + +With a METHOD, a SDF is able to run a data reservation script to manage the allocation of a resource number to a user identity. This solution has many advantages: + +- a) The SDF manages its own data. +- b) The SDF is there to manage SCF data which are used during a period of time which goes beyond the duration of a Service Logic Program Instance. +- c) The atomic execute operation permits to get simple Information Flows. +- d) The Information Flows are limited to two (request, result). +- e) The script is independent of the Service Logic. +- f) The SCFs can directly make their request of reservation to the SDF. + +##### 7.2.3.5.3 Object definition + +Similarly to object-oriented-database modelling, a base object which will support the method must be defined. During processing, the method would be invoked on an instance derived from this base object or a child object. + +The following object class is used to represent information related to the reservation procedures. + +``` +GenericAllocationPool {ATTRIBUTE assignmentTable + ,OBJECT IDENTIFIER: code} OBJECT-CLASS ::= { +KIND auxiliary +MUST CONTAIN {assignmentTable} +MAY CONTAIN {maxtime|randomAssigned} +ID code} +``` + +The GenericAllocationPool could be associated with an Organization Unit (or a subclass) OBJECT-CLASS to create an entry. + +The **assignmentTable** provided as an ASN.1 CLASS parameter is a multi-valued attribute which supports two contexts: + +- temporal context; + +– assignmentContext. + +It could be any attribute of an entry using the GenericAllocationPool auxiliary objectClass. + +The **maxtime** attribute indicates the duration of time the reservation could be maintained. It is used to create a suitable temporal context value to be associated for a selected value. + +**maxtime ATTRIBUTE ::= {** +**WITH SYNTAX INTEGER** +**SINGLE VALUE TRUE** +**ID id-at-maxtime}** + +The **randomAssigned** attribute indicates that the values of the assignmentTable attribute must be selected at random. + +**randomAssigned ATTRIBUTE ::= {** +**WITH SYNTAX BOOLEAN** +**SINGLE VALUE TRUE** +**ID id-at-randomAssigned}** + +##### 7.2.3.5.4 Methods definition + +Reservation methods are two generic methods which permit reservation of a unique value in a pool. (one method to assign, the other to release). + +**selectAndAssign METHOD** + +**::={** + +**SPECIFIC-INPUT DistinguishedName** + +*-- The DN of the user to which* + +*-- the selected value is temporarily assigned* + +**OUTPUT ATTRIBUTES** + +**assignmentTable** + +**BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry identified by the execute argument:** + +- 1) Selects a value of the assignmentTable attribute which is not associated with a context or which is associated with an expired temporal context. +- 2) Adds an assignmentContextValue equal to the specific input to the selected value. +- 3) Adds a temporal context value so that the selected value becomes irrelevant after maxtime units of time. +- 4) return the selected value without context values. + +**"** + +**ID** + +**id-mt-selectAndAssign** + +**}** + +**findAndRelease METHOD ::= {** + +**INPUT ATTRIBUTE** + +**assignmentTable** + +**SPECIFIC-OUTPUT** + +**DistinguishedName** + +*-- The DN of the user to which* + +*-- the selected value was* + +*-- temporarily assigned* + +**BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry identified by the execute argument:** + +- 1) Find the value of the assignmentTable attribute which is equal to the one received in the input-assertions element of the execute argument. +- 2) Remove from the DIB all its associated context values. +- 3) If this value was associated with valid temporal context values and an assignmentContext Value, return the associated assignmentContext value (user DN)." + +**ID** + +**id-mt-findAndRelease}** + +These generic METHODS could be used easily for supporting roaming number allocation procedures as follows: + +*-- example for the Roaming number* + +**roamingNumberPool OBJECT-CLASS ::= GenericAllocationPool { ATTRIBUTE: roamingTable, OBJECT IDENTIFIER:id-oc-roamingNumberPool}** + +``` + +roamingTable ATTRIBUTE { +WITH SYNTAX NumericString (SIZE(1..ub-international-isdn-number)) +ID id-at-assignmentTable} + +``` + +``` + +roamingNumberRule METHOD-USE-RULE ::= { +OBJECT CLASS TYPE id-oc-roamingNumberPool +MANDATORY METHODS {findAndRelease|selectAndAssign}} + +``` + +#### 7.2.3.6 Security supported by the SDF + +##### 7.2.3.6.1 Background + +The security facilities described in 7.2.2.4.1.1 are required to offer security features to IN services. + +##### 7.2.3.6.2 Requirements + +The keys of user/terminal must be stored with the user information. They must be protected against disclosure and tampering. + +The following capabilities shall be offered: + +- a) The credentials of a user/terminal provided in a bind argument shall be verified before opening a dialogue. +- b) The network (SDF) may be requested to authenticate itself back in the bind result. +- c) The origin (user/terminal) of a message may be authenticated (one-pass). +- d) The user may use several keys (e.g. a temporary key for the subscription, his key, his PIN, ...). +- e) Several algorithms may be used to authenticate the user/terminal. +- f) The keys and cryptographic algorithms may be used to make disposable tokens as described in the following subclause. +- g) For an authentication based on a PIN, the access shall disable after several consecutive failures. +- h) For anonymous services, credentials produced by a smart card shall be checked on a dialogue open between two network operators. + +##### 7.2.3.6.3 Object definition + +Since the same object could be used to store compute or check the credential, the following object class could be used to store the necessary information about the user security (parameters and policy). + +In case of UPT, for each UPT user, an entry of the **securityUserInfo** object class may be created, subordinate to each entry of class **uptUser**. + +``` + +securityUserInfo OBJECT-CLASS ::= { +MUST CONTAIN {securityFacilityId| + secretKey| + identifierList} +MAY CONTAIN {bindLevelIfOK| + currentList| + failureCounter| + lockSession| + maxAttempts} +ID id-oc-securityUserInfo } + +``` + +**securityFacilityId** is an attribute to name the verification (requirement c) + +``` + +securityFacilityId ATTRIBUTE ::= { + WITH SYNTAX + SF-CODE + EQUALITY MATCHING RULE objectIdentifierMatch + SINGLE VALUE TRUE + ID id-at-securityFacilityId} +SF-Code ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER + +``` + +The **securityFacilityId** could have different values: + +- id-sf-pwd for management access to the database by password +- id-sf-challengeResponse for standard access based on one pass challenge response authentication +- id-sf-onAirSubscription to authenticate the access during on-air subscription (the entry contains the same **identifierList** that the previous entry but **secretKey** is different). + +``` + +-- Security Facility id +id-sf-pwd SF-CODE ::= {id-sf pwd(1)} +id-sf-challengeResponse SF-CODE ::= {id-sf common (2)} +id-sf-onAirSubscription SF-CODE ::= {id-sf subscription(3)} + +``` + +**secretKey** is an attribute which contains the secret key (to be used by the cryptographic algorithm) of the user. + +``` + +secretKey ATTRIBUTE ::= { + WITH SYNTAX BIT STRING (SIZE(lb-secretKey..ub-secretKey)) + SINGLE VALUE TRUE + ID id-at-secretKey} + +``` + +``` + +-- The following values are merely examples +lb-secretKey INTEGER ::= 32 -- the boundary values could be expanded +ub-secretKey INTEGER ::= 128 -- by a network operator + +``` + +**identifierList** is an attribute which could contain four identifiers (requirement d): + +- **conformMethodIdentifier** identifies the method used to verify that some parts of the input message conform to specified criteria such as size, value matching with an attribute, greater than a counter, included in a time window (requirement b1), +- **fillMethodIdentifier** identifies the method use to fill the input message (first part of a **twoPartMessage** or **ThreePartMessage** or **FivePartMessage**) (requirement e). +- **oneToOneAlgorithm** (and respectively **oneToTwoAlgorithm**) identifies the cryptographic algorithm with one output (respectively two output). +- If KS is the secret key, IN is the input and OUT the output, A1 and A2 cryptographic algorithms, it would be $OUT = \text{output1of } (A2(RS\_size\_in\_bits \text{ first bits of } IN, A1(RAND\_size\_in\_bits \text{ last bits of } IN, KS)))$ (respectively $(OUT1, OUT2) = (A2(RS\_size\_in\_bits \text{ first bits of } IN, A1(RAND\_size\_in\_bits \text{ last bits of } IN, KS)))$ ). + +``` + +identifierList ATTRIBUTE ::= +{ + WITH SYNTAX + SEQUENCE{ + conformMethodIdentifier [1] MethodIdentifier, -- e.g. time window check + fillMethodIdentifier [2] MethodIdentifier-- e.g. generate a random of required size, + oneToOneAlgorithm [3] AlgorithmIdentifier -- e.g. A11 and A12, output RES from RS,RAND + oneToTwoAlgorithm [4] AlgorithmIdentifier } -- e.g. DECT algorithm output RES,SDK from RS,RAND +} + +``` + +1 It is common in security (e.g. UPT authentication by DTMF, ECMA GSS-API) when the verifier draws the challenge value to check that it is not a replay of a previous value. Two mechanisms could be used: a counter or a concatenation of the current time window and a random. + +**SINGLE VALUE** + +**TRUE** + +**ID**                    **id-at-identifierList}** + +-- AlgorithmIdentifier could be imported from ITU-T Rec. X.509 + +**AlgorithmIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE {** + +**algorithm ALGORITHM.&id ({SupportedAlgorithms}),** + +**parameters ALGORITHM.&Type({SupportedAlgorithms}{@algorithm}) OPTIONAL}** + +**MethodIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE {** + +**methodid METHOD.&id ({SupportedMethods}),** + +**inputAttributes METHOD.&InputAttributes ({SupportedMethods}{@method}) OPTIONAL,** + +**specific-Input METHOD.&SpecificInput ({SupportedMethods}{@method}) OPTIONAL}** + +**bindLevelIfOK** is a mono-valued attribute which contains an **AuthenticationLevel**. It is to be used by the bind operation with the argument of the abstract-syntax defined in 7.3/Q.1228 to determine the level of privileges granted to the user. When this attribute is absent and a bind operation is invoked, the bind operation returns an error (requirement a). + +**bindLevelIfOK ATTRIBUTE ::=** + +**{** + +**WITH SYNTAX** + +**AuthenticationLevel** + +**SINGLE VALUE TRUE** + +**ID id-at-bindLevelIfOK}** + +**lockSession** is a mono-valued attribute that contains the name of the entry and the mono-valued attribute of type boolean of this entry used to lock a dialogue to a mono-session (the timer set as temporal context on this lock attribute is the same for all the users). If this attribute is present and a bind operation is at the origin of the method invocation, the method first checks that the pointed attribute is FALSE before proceeding. + +This optional attribute could be used in prepaid service or VCC when to avoid fraud (bypassing of the user credit) no concurrent session is accepted for this account. + +**lockSession ATTRIBUTE ::= {** + +**WITH SYNTAX LockSession** + +**SINGLE VALUE TRUE** + +**ID id-at-lockSession}** + +**LockSession ::= SEQUENCE {** + +**entryName [0] DistinguishedName,** + +**attribute [1] ObjectIdentifier}** + +**}** + +For some security facilities, it is useful to count the number of failures and if necessary to lock the facility when a threshold is reached. The following two attributes are used to store these information (requirement f). + +**failureCounter ATTRIBUTE ::= {** + +**WITH SYNTAX** + +**INTEGER** + +**ORDERING MATCHING RULE** + +**integerOrderingMatch** + +**SINGLE VALUE** + +**TRUE** + +**ID** + +**id-at-failureCounter}** + +**maxAttempts ATTRIBUTE ::= {** + +**WITH SYNTAX** + +**INTEGER** + +**ORDERING MATCHING RULE** + +**integerOrderingMatch** + +**SINGLE VALUE** + +**TRUE** + +**ID** + +**id-at-maxAttempts}** + +To control that no replay is done with the challenges RAND already drawn, it is necessary to maintain a list of the randoms already used for the valid period indicated by RS. The **currentList** attribute contains a list of RAND already used for the current period of time (requirement b). + +``` + +currentList ATTRIBUTE ::= { + WITH SYNTAX BIT STRING, + EQUALITY MATCHING RULE bitStringMatch + ID id-at-currentList} + +``` + +##### 7.2.3.6.4 Methods definition + +The METHOD verifies the user credential against the information included in an entry of type **securityUserInfo**. This METHOD could be used during the bind or over a dialogue to authenticate the user in the database. It could be used for example when the user changes service data over a management access. + +``` + +verifyCredentials METHOD +::={ + SPECIFIC-INPUT TwoPartMessage + -- see the definition of this type below + SPECIFIC-OUTPUT + BOOLEAN + -- to indicate the success of the verification + BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry identified by the execute argument; this entry would be of class genericSecurityUserInfo: + 1) if maxattempts is present, verify that failureCounter is less than its value + 2) read the value of identifierList attribute (return "bad format entry" if failure) + 3) if conformMethodIdentifier is NULL go to step 5) + 4) run conformMethodIdentifier method on TwoPartMessage provided as specific input (return a "badconformance" error if the execution fails or if the result is false) + 5) run the oneToOneAlgorithm on the messageData bit string to get an expected certificationCode bit string + 6) return TRUE if the expected and provided certificationCode values match and exit, + 7) otherwise if failureCounter is present, increment it and return FALSE + " + ID id-mt-verifyCredentials} + +``` + +The value of **conformMethodIdentifier** could be **id-mt-conformCredentials**. + +``` + +ConformCredentials METHOD ::= { + SPECIFIC-INPUT TwoPartMessage + -- see the definition of this type below + SPECIFIC-OUTPUT BOOLEAN + -- to indicated the success of the verification + BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry identified by the execute argument; this entry would be of class genericSecurityUserInfo: + - verify with an embedded conformance algorithm that messageData value of TwoPartMessage is no replay (RAND is in the current time window and the associated RS is not in the list of the current time windows currentList). + - add RAND to time windows list currentList. + - return TRUE if no replay, + - otherwise return FALSE + " + ID id-mt-dectConformCredentials} + +``` + +The object class **SecurityUserInfo** supports the method **verifyCredentials**. + +``` + +securityUserInfoRule METHOD-USE-RULE ::= { + OBJECT CLASS TYPE id-oc-securityUserInfo + MANDATORY METHODS {verifyCredentials|fillSecurityTokens|conformCrendentials}} + +``` + +In the case of a visited network, entry (of **objectClass challengeResponseStock**) will contain in the SDF visited the DN of the entry (of **objectClass challengeResponseStock**), and will contain in the SDF home the DN of the entry (of **objectClass securityUserInfo**). + +The entry **securityUserInfo** designated by the DN will contain in its **identifierList** attribute the value **id-mt-fillSecurityTokens** in the field **fillMethodIdentifier**. + +**NPARTMESSAGE{INTEGER : n} ::= SEQUENCE SIZE(2..n) OF BIT STRING** + +**fillSecurityTokens {NPARTMESSAGE, OBJECT IDENTIFIER : code} METHOD ::= {** + +**SPECIFIC-INPUT INTEGER -- X number of value to be computed** + +**SPECIFIC-OUTPUT SEQUENCE OF NPARTMESSAGE** + +**BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry identified by the execute argument, this entry shall be of object class (or subclass) genericSecurityUserInfo:** + +- read the **secretKey** attribute and **Algorithms** attribute +- repeat X times + - fill the first **BIT STRING** field with a random value + - apply cryptographic algorithms to compute the other **BIT STRING** fields of the **NPARTMESSAGE**. +- return X NPartMessage values + +**"** + +**ID code** + +**-- id-mt-fillSecurityTokens-N** + +**}** + +##### 7.2.3.6.5 Security token + +###### 7.2.3.6.5.1 Background + +In telecommunication mobile systems, it is current that a user is roaming in a visited domain far from his home domain; it could be expensive to dialogue each time with the home network if it is only to authenticate the user in the visited domain (e.g. simple call without modification of user service data). In systems as GSM in Europe, a stock of security tokens (challenge, response, ciphering session key) is provided to the visited domain in order to authenticate the user and optionally the cipher on the radio channel. + +###### 7.2.3.6.5.2 Object definition + +This object class is used to represent a set of information which is common to all disposable tokens (stock identifier, source, size of the set). Disposable tokens could be, for example, authentication tokens pairs, triplets. + +**tokensStock {INTEGER: n, OBJECT IDENTIFIER : code } OBJECT-CLASS ::= {** + +**KIND abstract** + +**MUST CONTAIN {stockId | stock{n}}** + +**MAY CONTAIN {source | sizeOfRestocking}** + +**ID code -- id-oc-tokensStock-n** + +**}** + +**stockId** is a mono valued attribute of type **DT-Code** that is used as a naming attribute. + +**stockId ATTRIBUTE ::= {** + +**WITH SYNTAX DT-Code** + +**EQUALITY MATCHING RULE objectIdentifierMatch** + +**SINGLE VALUE TRUE** + +**ID id-at-stockId}** + +**DT-Code ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER** + +**source** is a mono-valued attribute of type choice. + +``` + +source ATTRIBUTE ::= { +WITH SYNTAX SourceType +SINGLE VALUE TRUE +ID id-at-source} + +``` + +SourceType ::=DistinguishedName + +In the visited network, the **source** attribute will be used to store the DN of the entry of class derived from **stockId**. In the home network, the attribute will contain the DN of an entry of class **securityUserInfo** (defined in the previous subclause). The **token** is generated using the method defined in the **fillMethodIdentifier** field of this entry of class **securityUserInfo**. + +**sizeOfRestocking** is a mono-valued attribute which indicates how many tokens have to be requested or computed when the **tokens** attribute is empty. + +``` + +sizeOfRestocking ATTRIBUTE ::= { +WITH SYNTAX INTEGER +ORDERING MATCHING RULE integerOrderingMatch +SINGLE VALUE TRUE +ID id-at-sizeOfRestocking } + +``` + +The following attribute could contain the precomputed set of (CHALLENGE,RES[,DCK][,NCHALLENGE,NRES]) (2, 3,4 or 5 values). + +``` + +stock(INTEGER: n, OBJECT IDENTIFIER : code ) ATTRIBUTE ::= { +WITH SYNTAX NPartsMessage{n} +ID code --id-at-challengeResponse when n is two +} + +``` + +NPartsMessage{INTEGER : n} ::= SEQUENCE SIZE(2..n) OF BIT STRING + +###### 7.2.3.6.5.3 Methods definition + +We consider that a DUA request to a DSA a stock of tokens by a method "provideTokens". + +The role of DUA could be played by a SCF or by the local SDF to reprovision its stock. + +The role of DSA could be played by the local SDF or by the home SDF. + +``` + +provideTokens METHOD ::= { +SPECIFIC-INPUT INTEGER, -- how many tokens are requested (NofRT) +OBJECT IDENTIFIER -- oid of the attribute (tokens) +SPECIFIC-OUTPUT ATTRIBUTE --attribute selected as input (tokens) +BEHAVIOUR "This method performs the following actions on the entry (thisEntry would be a variable with the DN value of this entry) identified by the execute argument: +1) If the attribute sizeOfRestocking doesn't exist in the entry, define a variable MAXNTsizeOfRestocking. +2) Verify that NofRT is inferior or equal to MAXNT (return an "execute error" if NofRT value is superior to MAXNT). +3) Read the attribute of the entry which has the selected oid and count the number of values (0 if empty) and put the result in a variable N (return "execute error" if the attribute doesn't exist). +4) Read the source attribute in the entry (return "execute error" error if source does not exist). +5) If N is inferior to NofRT and the DN of source indicates an entry of class or subclass tokenStock: +5a) Bind anonymous with the DSA which contains the entry defined by the address field of source. +5b) Execute the method provideTokens on the entry with MAXNT as value of the specific-input. +5c) If none error is returned, modify the tokens attribute by adding the resulted values. +6) If N is inferior to NofRT and the DN of source indicates an entry of class or subclass securityUserInfo: +6a) Execute the method defined by fillMethodIdentifier field value on the entry defined by the DN with MAXNT as specific input. +6b) If none error is returned, modify the tokens attribute by adding the resulted values. +7) Read the tokens attribute. +8) Define a variable "toBeReturned" with NofRT values of tokens attribute and a variable "toBeKept" with remainder values. +9) Remove tokens attribute. + +``` + +- 10) Modify tokens attribute by adding the "toBeKept" values. + - 11) Return the "toBeReturned" values. +- " +- ID id-mt-provideTokens} + +#### **7.2.3.7 Information flow diagrams for SDF Shadow Updates** + +This subclause defines the SDF-SDF Shadow Update operations in the form of information flow diagrams. These diagrams in this subclause show the different options for mapping the operations on the TC layer and do not include information flows for errors or for unbinding the association. The states on these diagrams show the states of the relevant SDF application entities, consistent with 14.4.2.1/Q.1228. + +##### **7.2.3.7.1 Copy supplier initiated call** + +For the case where the copy supplier initiates the dialogue, Figures 7-33 to 7-36 are applicable. + +Figure 7-33 shows the case where the DSASHadowBind, CoordinateShadowUpdate and UpdateShadow operations are all sent in separate TC PDUs. This approach is the only approach defined in Recommendation X.525, but may not be suited to IN applications due to the performance requirements of IN. A more suitable approach is to send multiple sequential SDF operations in a single TC PDU as if the first operation had been successful; this is shown in Figure 7-34. + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, and Shadow Copy. The diagram illustrates the flow of messages for Bind, CoOrdUpdate, and Update operations, including state transitions like Idle, WaitForSubsequentRequests, SDFBound, WaitForBindResult, WaitForCoordinationResult, WaitForUpdate, and WaitForUpdateConfirmation.](691626a7032a642bb74793336c37e274_img.jpg) + +The diagram is a sequence diagram with six lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, and Shadow Copy. The interaction proceeds as follows: + +- Bind Operation:** + - Shadow Master sends *Bind.inv* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *Idle* then *WaitForSubsequentRequests*. + - SDSMShM sends *DSASHadowBind* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *DSASHadowBind* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *DSASHadowBind* to SDSMShC. + - SDSMShC transitions to *Idle* then *Bind.inv* then *WaitForBindResult*. + - SDSMShC sends *DSASHadowBindResult* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *DSASHadowBindResult* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *DSASHadowBindResult* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *WaitForBindResult* then *DSASHadowBindResult* then *SDFBound*. + - SDSMShM sends *Bind.res* to Shadow Master. +- CoOrdUpdate Operation:** + - Shadow Master sends *CoOrdUpdate.inv* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *SDFBound* then *CoordinateShadowUpdate*. + - SDSMShM sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate* to SDSMShC. + - SDSMShC transitions to *SDFBound* then *CoOrdUpdate.inv* then *WaitForCoordinationResult*. + - SDSMShC sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate Result* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate Result* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *CoordinateShadowUpdate Result* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *CoordinateShadowUpdate* then *CoordinateShadowUpdate Result* then *WaitForCoordinationResult*. + - SDSMShM sends *CoOrdUpdate.res* to Shadow Master. +- Update Operation:** + - Shadow Master sends *Update.inv* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *WaitForCoordinationResult* then *WaitForUpdate* then *UpdateShadow*. + - SDSMShM sends *UpdateShadow* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *UpdateShadow* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *UpdateShadow* to SDSMShC. + - SDSMShC transitions to *CoOrdUpdate.res* then *WaitForUpdate* then *Update.inv* then *WaitForUpdateConfirmation*. + - SDSMShC sends *UpdateShadowResult* to the second TC lifeline. + - The second TC lifeline sends *UpdateShadowResult* to the first TC lifeline. + - The first TC lifeline sends *UpdateShadowResult* to SDSMShM. + - SDSMShM transitions to *UpdateShadow* then *UpdateShadowResult* then *WaitForUpdateConfirmation*. + - SDSMShM sends *Update.res* to Shadow Master. + - SDSMShM transitions to *Update.res* then *SDF Bound*. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, and Shadow Copy. The diagram illustrates the flow of messages for Bind, CoOrdUpdate, and Update operations, including state transitions like Idle, WaitForSubsequentRequests, SDFBound, WaitForBindResult, WaitForCoordinationResult, WaitForUpdate, and WaitForUpdateConfirmation. + +T1199990-98 + +**Figure 7-33/Q.1229 – Supplier initiated Copy Update using separate TC PDUs for each SDF-SDF operation** + +Figure 7-34 shows the case where the DSAShadowBind, CoordinateShadowUpdate and UpdateShadow operations are all sent in the same TC PDU. This is the preferred option, where efficiency is required and the shadow needs to be updated at the beginning of the dialogue. + +![Sequence diagram for Figure 7-34/Q.1229 showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy.](4cf20a1cc0755dff37937135bda4e2c6_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SM as Shadow Master + participant SDSMShM as SDSMShM + participant TC1 as TC + participant TC2 as TC + participant SDSMShC as SDSMShC + participant SC as Shadow Copy + + Note right of SDSMShM: Idle + Note right of SC: Idle + + SM->>SDSMShM: Bind.inv + SM->>SDSMShM: CoOrdUpdate.inv + SM->>SDSMShM: Update.inv + + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForSubsequent Requests + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate Shadow + Note right of SDSMShM: DSAShadowBind + Note right of SDSMShM: CoordinateShadow Update + + SDSMShM->>TC1: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate ShadowAndUpdate + + TC1->>TC2: DSAShadowBind + TC2->>SC: Bind.inv + Note right of SC: WaitForBindResult + + TC2->>TC1: DSAShadowBindResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: DSAShadowBindResult + SM->>SDSMShM: Bind.res + Note right of SDSMShM: BoundWithCoordinate Shadow + + TC2->>SDSMShC: CoordinateShadow Update + Note right of SDSMShC: SDFBound + + TC2->>SC: CoOrdUpdate.inv + Note right of SC: WaitForCoordinationResult + + TC2->>TC1: CoordinateShadow Update Result + TC1->>SDSMShM: CoordinateShadow Update Result + SM->>SDSMShM: CoOrdUpdate.res + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForUpdateConfirmation + + TC2->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + Note right of SDSMShC: Update.inv + + TC2->>SC: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of SC: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + + TC2->>TC1: UpdateShadowResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: UpdateShadowResult + SM->>SDSMShM: Update.res + Note right of SDSMShM: SDFBound + +``` + +Sequence diagram for Figure 7-34/Q.1229 showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy. + +T11100000-98 + +**Figure 7-34/Q.1229 – Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end** + +Additionally, the CopyConsumer may choose to bundle all the options on the returning end into a single TC message. It can be seen from Figure 7-35 that this does not affect the SDSMShC or SDSMShM state machines. + +![Sequence diagram showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy. The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Shadow Master and a Shadow Copy via SDSMShM and SDSMShC components, using TC PDUs for binding and updating operations.](7c6fd006fc4d304794392d41fab4ee10_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SM as Shadow Master + participant SDSMShM as SDSMShM + participant TC1 as TC + participant TC2 as TC + participant SDSMShC as SDSMShC + participant SC as Shadow Copy + + Note right of SDSMShM: Idle + Note right of SC: Idle + + SM->>SDSMShM: Bind.inv + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForSubsequent Requests + SM->>SDSMShM: CoOrdUpdate.inv + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate Shadow + SM->>SDSMShM: Update.inv + Note right of SDSMShM: DSAShadowBind, CoordinateShadow Update, UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate ShadowAndUpdate + SDSMShM->>TC1: + TC1->>TC2: DSAShadowBind + TC2->>SDSMShC: + Note right of SDSMShC: Bind.inv + TC2->>SDSMShC: CoordinateShadowUpdate + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForBindResult + TC2->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: Bind.res + SDSMShC->>TC2: + Note right of SDSMShC: SDFBound + TC2->>SDSMShC: CoOrdUpdate.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForCoordinationResult + SDSMShC->>TC2: + Note right of SDSMShC: CoOrdUpdate.res + TC2->>SDSMShC: + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + SDSMShC->>TC2: Update.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + TC2->>SDSMShC: + Note right of SDSMShC: Update.res + SDSMShC->>TC2: + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + TC2->>TC1: DSAShadowBindResult, CoordinateShadow UpdateResult, UpdateShadowResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: + Note right of SDSMShM: DSAShadowBindResult + SDSMShM->>SM: Bind.res + Note right of SDSMShM: BoundWithCoordinate Shadow + Note right of SDSMShM: CoordinateShadow UpdateResult + SDSMShM->>TC1: UpdateShadowResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: + Note right of SDSMShM: UpdateShadowResult + SDSMShM->>SM: CoOrdUpdate.res + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForUpdateConfirmation + SDSMShM->>TC1: + Note right of SDSMShM: SDFBound + TC1->>SM: Update.res + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy. The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Shadow Master and a Shadow Copy via SDSMShM and SDSMShC components, using TC PDUs for binding and updating operations. + +T11100010-98 + +**Figure 7-35/Q.1229 – Supplier initiated Copy Update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends** + +Figure 7-36 shows the case where the DSAShadowBind and CoordinateShadowUpdate operations are sent in the same TC PDU but the UpdateShadow operation is sent in its own TC PDU. This option is applicable where efficiency is required but the shadow supplier does not wish to update the shadow copy at the beginning of the dialogue. + +![Sequence diagram for Figure 7-36/Q.1229 showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end for both Bind and Coordinate messages. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy.](701f4311e49f346390759520fcd19af4_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SM as Shadow Master + participant SDSMShM as SDSMShM + participant TC1 as TC + participant TC2 as TC + participant SDSMShC as SDSMShC + participant SC as Shadow Copy + + Note right of SDSMShM: Idle + Note right of SC: Idle + + SM->>SDSMShM: Bind.inv + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForSubsequent Requests + SM->>SDSMShM: CoOrdUpdate.inv + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate Shadow + SM->>SDSMShM: Delimiter + Note right of SDSMShM: DSAShadowBind +CoordinateShadow +Update + SDSMShM->>TC1: DSAShadowBind + SDSMShM->>TC1: CoordinateShadow Update + Note right of SDSMShM: BindWithCoordinate ShadowOnly + TC1->>TC2: DSAShadowBind + TC1->>TC2: CoordinateShadow Update + TC2->>SDSMShC: DSAShadowBind + TC2->>SDSMShC: CoordinateShadow Update + SDSMShC->>SC: Bind.inv + Note right of SC: WaitForBindResult + SC->>SDSMShC: Bind.res + SDSMShC->>TC2: DSAShadowBindResult + TC2->>TC1: DSAShadowBindResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: DSAShadowBindResult + SDSMShM->>SM: Bind.res + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForCoordination Result + SDSMShC->>SC: SDFBound +CoOrdUpdate.inv + Note right of SC: WaitForCoordination Result + SC->>SDSMShC: CoOrdUpdate.res + SDSMShC->>TC2: CoordinateShadow Update Result + TC2->>TC1: CoordinateShadow Update Result + TC1->>SDSMShM: CoordinateShadow Update Result + SDSMShM->>SM: CoOrdUpdate.res + Note right of SDSMShM: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + Note right of SC: WaitForUpdate + SM->>SDSMShM: Update.inv + SDSMShM->>TC1: UpdateShadow + TC1->>TC2: UpdateShadow + TC2->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + SDSMShC->>SC: Update.inv + Note right of SC: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + SC->>SDSMShC: Update.res + SDSMShC->>TC2: UpdateShadowResult + TC2->>TC1: UpdateShadowResult + TC1->>SDSMShM: UpdateShadowResult + SDSMShM->>SM: Update.res + Note right of SDSMShM: SDFBound + Note right of SC: WaitForUpdate + +``` + +Sequence diagram for Figure 7-36/Q.1229 showing Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end for both Bind and Coordinate messages. Lifelines: Shadow Master, SDSMShM, TC, TC, SDSMShC, Shadow Copy. + +T11100020-98 + +**Figure 7-36/Q.1229 – Supplier initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end for both Bind and Coordinate messages** + +##### 7.2.3.7.2 Copy consumer initiated call + +For the case where the copy consumer initiates the dialogue, Figures 7-37 to 7-39 are applicable. + +Figure 7-37 shows the case where the DSAShadowBind, RequestShadowUpdate and UpdateShadow operations are all sent in separate TC PDUs. This approach is the only approach defined in Recommendation X.525, but may not be suited to IN applications due to the performance requirements of IN. A more suitable approach is to send multiple sequential SDF operations in a single TC PDUs as if the first operation had been successful; this is shown in Figure 7-38. + +![Sequence diagram Figure 7-37: Consumer initiated Copy Update using separate TC PDUs. It shows vertical lifelines for Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, two TC columns, SDSMShM, and Shadow Master. Messages flow horizontally between these entities. Key steps include: 1. Bind.inv from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 2. DSAShadowBind across TC. 3. Bind.inv to Shadow Master. 4. DSAShadowBindResult back across TC. 5. Bind.res to Shadow Copy. 6. ReqUpdate.inv from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 7. RequestShadowUpdate across TC. 8. ReqUpdate.inv to Shadow Master. 9. RequestShadowUpdateResult back across TC. 10. ReqUpdate.res to Shadow Copy. 11. Update.inv from Shadow Master to SDSMShM. 12. UpdateShadow across TC. 13. Update.inv to Shadow Copy. 14. Update.res from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 15. UpdateShadowResult across TC. 16. Update.res to Shadow Master. Various state notes like 'Idle', 'WaitForSubsequent Requests', and 'SDFBound' are shown along the lifelines.](d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SC as Shadow Copy + participant SDSMShC as SDSMShC + participant TC1 as TC + participant TC2 as TC + participant SDSMShM as SDSMShM + participant SM as Shadow Master + + Note over SDSMShC: Idle + Note over SM: Idle + SC->>SDSMShC: Bind.inv + Note over SDSMShC: WaitForSubsequent +Requests + SDSMShC->>TC1: Delimeter + Note over SDSMShC: DSAShadowBind + TC1->>TC2: DSAShadowBind + TC2->>SM: Bind.inv + Note over SM: WaitForBindResult + SM->>TC2: Bind.res + TC2->>SDSMShM: DSAShadowBindResult + SDSMShM->>SDSMShC: DSAShadowBindResult + SDSMShC->>SC: Bind.res + Note over SDSMShC: SDFBound + Note over SM: SDFBound + SC->>SDSMShC: ReqUpdate.inv + Note over SDSMShC: RequestShadowUpdate + TC1->>TC2: RequestShadowUpdate + TC2->>SM: ReqUpdate.inv + Note over SM: WaitForRequest +ShadowResult + SM->>TC2: ReqUpdate.res + TC2->>SDSMShM: RequestShadow +UpdateResult + SDSMShM->>SDSMShC: RequestShadow +UpdateResult + SDSMShC->>SC: ReqUpdate.res + Note over SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + Note over SM: WaitForUpdate + SM->>TC2: Update.inv + TC2->>SDSMShM: UpdateShadow + SDSMShM->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + SDSMShC->>SC: Update.inv + Note over SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate +Confirmation + SC->>SDSMShC: Update.res + Note over SDSMShC: UpdateShadowResult + SDSMShC->>TC1: UpdateShadowResult + TC1->>TC2: UpdateShadowResult + TC2->>SM: Update.res + Note over SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + Note over SM: SDFBound + +``` + +Sequence diagram Figure 7-37: Consumer initiated Copy Update using separate TC PDUs. It shows vertical lifelines for Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, two TC columns, SDSMShM, and Shadow Master. Messages flow horizontally between these entities. Key steps include: 1. Bind.inv from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 2. DSAShadowBind across TC. 3. Bind.inv to Shadow Master. 4. DSAShadowBindResult back across TC. 5. Bind.res to Shadow Copy. 6. ReqUpdate.inv from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 7. RequestShadowUpdate across TC. 8. ReqUpdate.inv to Shadow Master. 9. RequestShadowUpdateResult back across TC. 10. ReqUpdate.res to Shadow Copy. 11. Update.inv from Shadow Master to SDSMShM. 12. UpdateShadow across TC. 13. Update.inv to Shadow Copy. 14. Update.res from Shadow Copy to SDSMShC. 15. UpdateShadowResult across TC. 16. Update.res to Shadow Master. Various state notes like 'Idle', 'WaitForSubsequent Requests', and 'SDFBound' are shown along the lifelines. + +T11100030-98 + +**Figure 7-37/Q.1229 – Consumer initiated Copy Update using separate TC PDUs for each SDF-SDF operation** + +Figure 7-38 shows the case where the DSAShadowBind and RequestShadowUpdate operations are sent in the same TC PDU. Additionally, if the Shadow agreement involves updating the shadow at the initiation of the connection, the Copy Supplier TC may choose to bundle all the options on the returning end into a single TC message as shown in Figure 7-39. + +![Sequence diagram for Figure 7-38/Q.1229 showing a consumer-initiated copy update using a single TC PDU on the sending end. Lifelines: Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, TC, TC, SDSMShM, Shadow Master. The process involves binding, requesting an update, receiving a result, sending an update, and receiving a confirmation.](9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Shadow Copy + participant SDSMShC + participant TC + participant TC + participant SDSMShM + participant Shadow Master + + Note right of SDSMShC: Idle + Note right of Shadow Master: Idle + + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Bind.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForSubsequent Requests + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: ReqUpdate.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: DSAShadowBind RequestShadowUpdate + Note right of SDSMShC: BindWithRequest Shadow + SDSMShC->>TC: Request Shadow Update Result + TC->>SDSMShM: DSAShadowBind + TC->>SDSMShM: RequestShadowUpdate + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForBindResult RequestFromConsumer + Shadow Master->>SDSMShM: Bind.res + Note right of Shadow Master: ReqUpdate.inv + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForRequest ShadowResult + Shadow Master->>SDSMShM: ReqUpdate.res + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForUpdate + Note right of SDSMShM: Request Shadow Update Result + Note right of SDSMShM: UpdateShadow + TC->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + TC->>SDSMShM: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of Shadow Master: Update.res + Note right of Shadow Master: SDFBound + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: ReqUpdate.res + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Update.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Update.res + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + +``` + +T11100040-98 + +Sequence diagram for Figure 7-38/Q.1229 showing a consumer-initiated copy update using a single TC PDU on the sending end. Lifelines: Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, TC, TC, SDSMShM, Shadow Master. The process involves binding, requesting an update, receiving a result, sending an update, and receiving a confirmation. + +**Figure 7-38/Q.1229 – Consumer initiated Copy Update using a single TC PDU on sending end** + +![Sequence diagram for Figure 7-39/Q.1229 showing a consumer-initiated copy update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends. Lifelines: Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, TC, TC, SDSMShM, Shadow Master. The process is similar to Figure 7-38 but with separate TC PDUs for the request and update results.](238754529581b74f0696943d436494bb_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Shadow Copy + participant SDSMShC + participant TC + participant TC + participant SDSMShM + participant Shadow Master + + Note right of SDSMShC: Idle + Note right of Shadow Master: Idle + + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Bind.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForSubsequent Requests + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: ReqUpdate.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: DSAShadowBind RequestShadowUpdate + Note right of SDSMShC: BindWithRequest Shadow + SDSMShC->>TC: RequestShadow UpdateResult + TC->>SDSMShM: DSAShadowBind + TC->>SDSMShM: RequestShadowUpdate + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForBindResult RequestFromConsumer + Shadow Master->>SDSMShM: Bind.res + Note right of Shadow Master: ReqUpdate.inv + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForRequestShadowResult + Shadow Master->>SDSMShM: Update.inv + Note right of Shadow Master: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + Note right of SDSMShM: RequestShadow UpdateResult + Note right of SDSMShM: UpdateShadow + TC->>SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + TC->>SDSMShM: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of Shadow Master: Update.res + Note right of Shadow Master: SDFBound + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: ReqUpdate.res + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Update.inv + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadow + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate Confirmation + Shadow Copy->>SDSMShC: Update.res + Note right of SDSMShC: UpdateShadowResult + Note right of SDSMShC: WaitForUpdate + +``` + +T11100050-98 + +Sequence diagram for Figure 7-39/Q.1229 showing a consumer-initiated copy update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends. Lifelines: Shadow Copy, SDSMShC, TC, TC, SDSMShM, Shadow Master. The process is similar to Figure 7-38 but with separate TC PDUs for the request and update results. + +**Figure 7-39/Q.1229 – Consumer initiated Copy Update using single TC PDUs on both sending and terminating ends** + +#### **7.2.3.8 Mapping tables for signalling control primitives** + +##### **7.2.3.8.1 Introduction** + +A SSF\_CCF Basic Primitive Interface Model (BPIM) is provided in Annex A/Q.1228. That annex also includes the definition of the applied primitive signals in the INAP SDL model. The SSF\_CCF Basic Primitive Interface Model (BPIM) allows to describe the applied signalling primitive interfaces and their possible mappings to applied signalling protocols. The INAP SDL model consists of two half calls: one originating (SSF\_CCF\_A), the other terminating (SSF\_CCF\_B). In order to operate the model, both half calls are needed. + +The BCSM is supposed to model existing switch processing of a basic two-party call and should reflect the functional separation between the originating and terminating portions of calls. The SSF-CCF BPIM includes a half call (SSF\_CCF\_A) with an Originating BCSM and a half call (SSF\_CCF\_B) with a Terminating BCSM. In this way the full functionality of the interworking between the O\_BCSM and the T\_BCSM is catered for. Since the BCSM is generic, it may describe events that do not apply to certain access arrangements (e.g. analogue signalling systems). + +The SSF\_CCF Generic Primitive Interface Model supports four different interface types: the SigCon interface to/from NNI/UNI [e.g. ISUP/DSS1], the IBI interface between half calls and the INAP interface to/from the standardized INAP messages (operations)]. + +The signalling control interface is a generic interface that can be mapped to different signalling protocols. Mappings examples are provided from SigCon\_A respectively SigCon\_B primitive signals to DSS1 and ISUP messages and shown in mapping tables for each half call. However, mapping to other signalling protocols may as well be applied. + +Between the two call halves a switch internal intra BCSM Interface (IBI) carrying abstract generic primitive signals is applied. + +The generic primitive signals used in the SDLs are aligned with the information flows described in Recommendation Q.71. The primitive signals defined supporting the UNI/NNI interface are attached to improve the readability of the mapping tables. The SCF-SSF primitives supporting the INAP interface are defined in Annex A/Q.1228 and are not listed here as they map directly to the corresponding INAP operations defined in clause 17/Q.1228. + +##### **7.2.3.8.2 Examples of mapping tables for IN used primitive signals** + +###### **7.2.3.8.2.1 How to read the tables** + +The mapping tables provided are to show the generic primitive signals and their interfaces and proposed possible mapping to applicable agent signals. As an example ISUP and DSS1 are here indicated as possible applied agent protocols. However, any applicable agent protocol may be used. It may be possible to derive the actual specification for any agent protocol by using this description in combination with the appropriate interworking specification. In the tables, references are made to the primitive signalling interfaces (e.g. in forward direction the interfaces c, e and g) and to the agent signalling interfaces (e.g. interfaces a and i) as shown in the SSF/CCF Primitive Signal Interface model in Figure 7-40. Furthermore the term "influence" is applied in the tables to indicate where the SCF may have the ability to impact call signalling procedures, e.g. ISUP messages and parameters. Where a mapping to UNI/NNI appropriate signalling messages for IN CS-2 support is required and not known, this is indicated as to be determined (tdb). + +![Figure 7-40/Q.1229 – SSF_CCF basic generic Primitive Signal Interface model. This diagram shows two vertical stacks representing the 'Originating call half' (SSF_CCF_A) and 'Terminating call half' (SSF_CCF_B). Each stack contains three main components: a CONTROL Agent (O_SCF or T_SCF), a BCSM (O_BCSM or T_BCSM), and a SIGNAL CONTROL Agent (O_SIGNAL or T_SIGNAL). The components are interconnected by arrows labeled with letters (k, l, o, p, a, b, c, d, e, f, q, r, h, g, i, j, m, n). External interfaces are labeled SCF and UNI/NNI. A central 'IBI' signal connects the BCSMs of both halves. A small code 'T11100060-98' is in the bottom right.](b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-40/Q.1229 – SSF\_CCF basic generic Primitive Signal Interface model. This diagram shows two vertical stacks representing the 'Originating call half' (SSF\_CCF\_A) and 'Terminating call half' (SSF\_CCF\_B). Each stack contains three main components: a CONTROL Agent (O\_SCF or T\_SCF), a BCSM (O\_BCSM or T\_BCSM), and a SIGNAL CONTROL Agent (O\_SIGNAL or T\_SIGNAL). The components are interconnected by arrows labeled with letters (k, l, o, p, a, b, c, d, e, f, q, r, h, g, i, j, m, n). External interfaces are labeled SCF and UNI/NNI. A central 'IBI' signal connects the BCSMs of both halves. A small code 'T11100060-98' is in the bottom right. + +Figure 7-40/Q.1229 – SSF\_CCF basic generic Primitive Signal Interface model + +###### 7.2.3.8.2.2 Primitive signal conventions + +Each Primitive signal will as a mandatory parameter include a CallRef parameter consisting of a CallFlag and a CallID (call instance identifier). The Call Flag indicates the direction of the primitive signal as indicated in Figure 7-41. + +![Figure 7-41/Q.1229 – Primitive conventions. This diagram illustrates signal conventions between two entities, SSF_CCF_A and SSF_CCF_B, separated by dashed vertical lines. It shows various signal types (x.ind, x.req, x.resp, x.conf) and their directions. Below the main signal arrows, horizontal arrows indicate 'Call Flag: From Address' and 'Call Flag: To Address' conventions between the two entities. A small code 'T11100070-98' is in the bottom right.](5ec3284657e4df0df3653dd61d0ecd13_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-41/Q.1229 – Primitive conventions. This diagram illustrates signal conventions between two entities, SSF\_CCF\_A and SSF\_CCF\_B, separated by dashed vertical lines. It shows various signal types (x.ind, x.req, x.resp, x.conf) and their directions. Below the main signal arrows, horizontal arrows indicate 'Call Flag: From Address' and 'Call Flag: To Address' conventions between the two entities. A small code 'T11100070-98' is in the bottom right. + +Figure 7-41/Q.1229 – Primitive conventions + +###### Primitive signal types + +- *Confirmed* +Example: B party answer message received in response to a setup request message (e.g. ANM, CON in ISUP). +- *Unconfirmed* +Example: B party alerted, Alert message sent backward to notify calling party (e.g. ACM (free subscr.) or CPG(Alert) in ISUP). +- *End-to-End* +Example: Call setup messages that need end-to-end messaging. (e.g. IAM, ACM, ANM, CON in ISUP) +- *Link-by-Link (L)* +Example: Release request from the network or a call party (e.g. REL/RLC in ISUP) + +###### 7.2.3.8.2.3 Primitive signal definitions + +The generic primitive signals used in the SDLs are aligned with the information flows described in Recommendation Q.71. The primitive signals defined supporting the UNI/NNI interface are included here in order to ease the readability of the mapping tables. The SCF-SSF primitives supporting the INAP interface are defined in Annex A/Q.1228 and are not listed here as they map to corresponding INAP operations defined in clause 17/Q.1228. + +###### 7.2.3.8.2.4 Description of UNI/NNI related primitives + +###### Setup + +The Setup primitive is used to request establishment of a call connection. This is a confirmed signal, i.e. a response confirmation Setup primitive is used to confirm that the connection has been established. + +The request for establishment of a connection can be originated by either the user or the network (i.e. SCF). + +###### Release + +The Release primitive is used to notify that a user has disconnected from the connection and cannot be connected and to request disconnection of a call connection. This is an unconfirmed signal. + +###### SubsequentAddress + +The SubsequentAddress primitive is a called number (address) signal for conveying subsequent address information during the digit-by-digit methods of call setup. and for conveying information about last digit received, i.e. address end during the digit-by-digit methods of call setup. This is an unconfirmed signal. + +###### CallProgress + +The CallProgress primitive is a signal that is used to report status and/or other types of call information across the network. The type of information is indicated (e.g. "no indication", "alerting", "remote call hold", etc.). This is an unconfirmed signal. + +###### NetworkSuspend + +The NetworkSuspend primitive is a signal used to suspend the call on behalf of the called party upon receipt of an on-hook indication from the terminating line or upon receipt of a network suspend message indication from terminating side. This is an unconfirmed signal. + +###### **NetworkResume** + +NetworkResume primitive is a signal used to resume the call on behalf of the called party upon receipt of a re-answer indication from the terminating line as the subscriber goes off-hook or upon receipt of a network resume message indication from terminating side. This is an unconfirmed signal. + +###### **Failure** + +Failure primitive is a signal used to report the occurrence of a failure in the network. + +###### **Reconnect** + +Reconnect primitive is a signal used to reconnect a controlling call party (leg) to the call. The call party is alerted (e.g. power ringing and/or display information) as the request is given for reconnection of the controlling call party to the call (with a held call party). + +###### 7.2.3.8.2.5 Primitive Signals Mapping Tables, Originating Half Call + +a) *Call control primitive signals* + +**Table 7-17/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to signalling Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call** + +| Interface primitives | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | IBI signal (e/f) | Information notes | Agent Protocol ISUP (a/b) | Agent Protocol DSS1 (a/b) | +|----------------------|------------------------|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------| +| Setup | indication (c) | req.ind (e) | End-to-End | IAM | SETUP | +| Setup | response (d) | resp.conf (f) | End-to-End
*) May be Discarded if backward resp. if sent previously | ANM, CON *) | CONNECT *) | +| SubsequentAddress | indication (c) | req.ind (e) | Link-by-Link
May include both address digits(s) and indication for AddressEnd | SAM | INFORMATION | +| CallProgress | request (d) | req.ind (f) | End-to-End
*)May be discarded if sent previously | ACM, CPG | ALERTING, PROGRESS | +| Release | request (d) | req.ind (f) | Link-by-Link
B-Party (or SSF) initiated disconnect | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| Release | indication (c) | req.ind (e) | Link-by-Link
A-Party initiated disconnect | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| NetworkSuspend | request (d) | req.ind (f) | End-to-End CS-2
*) "on-hook" | SUSPEND | - *) | +| NetworkResume | request (d) | req.ind (f) | End-to-End CS-2
*) "off-hook" | RESUME | - *) | +| ServiceFeature | request (d) | req.ind (f) | 'Link-by-Link'
B-party initiated Midcall event -- Applies to stimulus and functional terminal protocols | | | +| ServiceFeature | indication (c) | req.ind (e) | A-party initiated Midcall event
Applies to stimulus and functional terminal protocols | tbd | tbd | + +**Table 7-17/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to signalling Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call (concluded)** + +| Interface primitives | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | IBI signal (e/f) | Information notes | Agent Protocol ISUP (a/b) | Agent Protocol DSS1 (a/b) | +|----------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------| +| Data | request (d) | req.ind (f)
req.ind (e) | ServiceToUser-Information
(Sent to A, received from T_BSM or sent to B) | tbd | tbd | +| Data | indication (c)
request (d) | req.ind (e)
req.ind (f) | UserToService-Information
(send by A-Party or B-Party) | tbd | tbd | +| Failure | indication (c) | req.ind (e)
req.ind (f)
*) | *) Call release is initiated by SSF | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| Reconnect | request (d) | | | tbd | tbd | + +b) SC-SSF primitive signals + +**Table 7-18/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call** + +| Interface primitives | O_SCF CONTROL (o/p) | IBI signal (e/f) | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|---------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------| +| ActivateService-Filtering | (p) | - | - | SSME
SSF internal | ActivateService-Filtering | +| ActivityTest | (p) | - | - | *)SSF-SCF check | | +| AnalysedInformation | (o) | - | -
Setup.ind (c) *) | (DP specific)
*) DP report to SCF: routing addr. Available | AnalysedInformation
-*) | +| AnalyseInformation | (p) | -influence (e) *)
Setup.ind.req | -influence *) | (DP specific)
*)- resumes originating basic call process. | AnalyseInformation | +| ApplyCharging | (p) | - | - | - | ApplyCharging | + +**Table 7-18/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call (continued)** + +| Interface primitives | O_SCF CONTROL (o/p) | IBI signal (e/f) | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| ApplyChargingReport | (o) | - | - | - | ApplyChargingReport | +| AssistRequest-Instructions | (o) | - | - | | AssistRequest-Instructions | +| CallGap | (p) | - | - | | CallGap | +| CallInformationReport | (o) | - | - | | CallInformation-Report | +| CallInformationRequest | (p) | - | - | | CallInformation-Request | +| Cancel | (p) | - | - | Cancel "all" | Cancel | +| CancelStatusReport-Request | (p) | - | - | | CancelStatusRequest | +| CollectedInformation | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | CollectedInformation | +| CollectInformation | (p) | -influence | influence | | CollectInformation | +| Connect | (p) | influence | influence | | Connect | +| ConnectToResource | (p) | -influence | -influence | | ConnectToResource | +| Continue | (p) | - | - | resumes call processing | Continue | +| ContinueWithArgument | (p) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2)
resumes call processing | ContinueWith-Argument | +| CreateCSA | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | CreateCSA | +| DisconnectForward-Connection | (p) | - | - *) | - *) release of e.g. a temporary connection to an IP is not modelled | DisconnectForward-Connection | +| DisconnectLeg | (p) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | DisconnectLeg | + +**Table 7-18/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call (continued)** + +| Interface primitives | O_SCF CONTROL (o/p) | IBI signal (e/f) | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|-------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| EntityReleased | (o) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | EntityReleased | +| EstablishTemporary-Connection | (p) | - *) | - *) | *) set-up of a temporary connection to an IP is not modelled | EstablishTemporary-Connection | +| EventNotification-Charging | (o) | - | - | | Event-Notification-Charging | +| EventReportBCSM | (o) | - | - | | EventReport-BCSM | +| EventReportFacility | (o) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | EventReport-Facility | +| FurnishCharging-Information | (p) | - | - | | FurnishCharging-Information | +| HoldCallInNetwork | (p) | - | influence | | HoldCallInNetwork | +| InitialDP | (o) | - | - | | InitialDP | +| InitiateCallAttempt | (p) | influence | influence | | InitiateCallAttempt | +| ManageTriggerData | (P) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | ManageTriggerData | +| MergeCallSegments | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | MergeCallSegments | +| MoveCallSegments | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | MoveCallSegments | +| MoveLeg | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | Moveleg | +| OAbandon | (o) | - | - | (INAP CS-2)
(DP specific) | OAbandon | +| OAnswer | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | OAnswer | +| OCalledPartyBusy | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | OCalledPartyBusy | +| ODisconnect | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | ODisconnect | +| OMidCall | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | OMidCall | +| ONoAnswer | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | ONoAnswer | + +**Table 7-18/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call (continued)** + +| Interface primitives | O_SCF CONTROL (o/p) | IBI signal (e/f) | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|---------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| OriginationAttempt | (o) | - | - | (INAP CS-2)
(DP specific) | OriginationAttempt | +| OriginationAttempt-
Authorized | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | OriginationAttempt-
Authorized | +| OSuspended | (o) | - | - | (INAP CS-2)
(DP specific) | OSuspended | +| Reconnect | (p) | - *) | influence *) | (INAP CS-2)
) ff | Reconnect | +| ReleaseCall | (p) | influence | influence | | ReleaseCall | +| ReportUTSI | (o) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | ReportUTSI | +| RequestCurrentStatus-
Report | (p) | - | - | | RequestCurrent-
StatusReport | +| RequestEveryStatus-
ChangeReport | (p) | - | - | | RequestEvery-
ChangeReport | +| RequestFirst-
StatusMatchReport | (p) | - | - | | RequestFirst-
MatchReport | +| RequestNotification-
ChargingEvent | (p) | -*) | *) influence | *)Treatment is national network specific | RequestNotification-
ChargingEvent | +| RequestReport-
BCSMEEvent | (p) | -influence | -influence | E.g. request for midCall events | RequestReport-
BCSMEEvent | +| RequestReportUTSI | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | RequestReportUTSI | +| RequestReport-
FacilityEvent | (p) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | RequestReport-
FacilityEvent | +| ResetTimer | (p) | - | - | | ResetTimer | +| RouteSelectFailure | (o) | - | - | (DP specific) | RouteSelectFailure | + +**Table 7-18/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Originating Half Call (concluded)** + +| Interface primitives | O_SCF CONTROL (o/p) | IBI signal (e/f) | O_SIGNAL CONTROL (c/d) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|---------------------------|---------------------|------------------|------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------| +| SendCharging-Information | | | influence | | | +| SendFacility-Information | (p) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | SendFacility-Information | +| SendSTUI | (p) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | SendSTUI | +| ServiceFiltering-Response | (o) | - | - | | ServiceFiltering-Response | +| SplitLeg | (p) | - | - | | SplitLeg | + +###### 7.2.3.8.2.6 Primitive Signals Mapping Tables, Terminating half call + +a) *Call control primitive signals* + +**Table 7-19/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to signalling Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call** + +| Interface primitives | IBI signal (e/f) | T_SIGNAL CONTROL (h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocol ISUP (i/j) | Agent Protocol DSS 1 (i/j) | +|----------------------|------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------| +| Setup | req.ind (e) | req (g) | End-to-End | IAM | SETUP | +| Setup | resp.conf (f) | conf (h) | End-to-End
*) May be Discarded if backward response sent previously. | ANM, CON *) | CONNECT *) | +| SubsequentAddress | req.ind (e) | req (g) | Link-by-Link
May include both address digits(s) and indication for AddressEnd | SAM | INFORMATION | +| CallProgress | req.ind (f) | ind (h) | End-to-End
*)May be discarded if sent previously | ACM, CPG | ALERTING, PROGRESS | + +**Table 7-19/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to signalling Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call (concluded)** + +| Interface primitives | IBI signal
(e/f) | T_SIGNAL
CONTROL
(h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocol
ISUP
(i/j) | Agent Protocol
DSS 1
(i/j) | +|----------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|----------------------------------| +| Release | req.ind (f) | ind (h) | Link-by-Link
B-Party initiated disconnect | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| Release | req.ind (e) | req (g) | Link-by-Link
A-Party (or SSF) initiated disconnect | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| NetworkSuspend | req.ind (f) | ind (h) | End-to-End CS-2
*) "on-hook" | SUSPEND | - *) | +| NetworkResume | req.ind (f) | ind (h) | End-to-End CS-2
*) "off-hook" | RESUME | - *) | +| ServiceFeature | req.ind (f) | ind (h) | "Link-by-Link" B-party initiated Midcall event
-- Applies to stimulus and functional terminal protocols | tbd | tbd | +| ServiceFeature | req.ind (e) | req (g) | A-party initiated Midcall event.
-- Applies to stimulus and functional terminal protocols | tbd | tbd | +| Data | req.ind (f) | ind (h)
req (g) | ServiceToUser-Information
(Sent to A, received from T_Signal or sent to B) | tbd | tbd | +| Data | req.ind (e)
req.ind (f) | req (g)
ind (h) | UserToService-Information
(Send by A-Party or B-Party) | tbd | tbd | +| Failure | ind.req (f)
ind.req (e) | ind (h) | *) Call release is initiated by SSF | REL/RLC | DISCONNECT | +| Reconnect | - | request (g) | | ffs | ffs | + +###### b) SCF-SSF primitive signals + +Table 7-20/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call Table + +| Interface primitives | T_SCF CONTROL (q/r) | IBI signal (e/f) | T_SIGNAL CONTROL (h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|----------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------| +| ActivateService-Filtering | (r) | - no influence (except if call is filtered) | - no influence (except if call is filtered) | SSME SSF internal | ActivateService-Filtering | +| ActivityTest | (r) | - | - | *)SSF-SCF dialogue check | | +| ApplyCharging | (r) | - | - | - | ApplyCharging | +| ApplyChargingReport | (q) | - | - | - | ApplyChargingReport | +| AssistRequest-Instructions | (q) | - | - | | AssistRequest-Instructions | +| AuthorizeTermination | (r) | -influence | influence | (DP specific) CS-2*)- resume terminating basic call process. | AuthorizeTermination | +| CallGap | (r) | - no influence (except if call is gapped) | - no influence (except if call is gapped) | | CallGap | +| CallInformationReport | (q) | - | - | | CallInformation-Report | +| CallInformation-Request | (r) | - | - | | CallInformation-Request | +| Cancel | (r) | - | - | Cancel "all" | Cancel | +| CancelStatusReport-Request | (r) | - | - | | CancelStatusRequest | +| Connect | (r) | influence | influence | | Connect | +| ConnectToResource | (r) | -influence | -influence | | ConnectToResource | +| Continue | (r) | - | - | | Continue | +| ContinueWith-Argument | (r) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | ContinueWith-Argument | +| CreateCSA | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | CreateCSA | + +**Table 7-20/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call Table (continued)** + +| Interface primitives | T_SCF CONTROL (q/r) | IBI signal (e/f) | T_SIGNAL CONTROL (h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|-------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| DisconnectForward-Connection | (r) | - | - *) | *) release of e.g. a temporary connection to an IP is not modelled | DisconnectForward-Connection | +| DisconnectLeg | (r) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | DisconnectLeg | +| EntityReleased | (q) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | EntityReleased | +| EstablishTemporary-Connection | (r) | - *) | - *) | *) set-up of a temporary connection to an IP is not modelled. | EstablishTemporary-Connection | +| EventNotification-Charging | (q) | - | - | | Event-Notification-Charging | +| EventReportBCSM | (q) | - | - | | EventReport-BCSM | +| EventReport-Facility | (q) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | EventReportFacility | +| FacilitySelectedAnd-Available | (q) | | | (INAP CS-2) | FacilitySelected-AndAvailable | +| FurnishCharging-Information | (r) | - | - | | FurnishCharging-Information | +| HoldCallInNetwork | (r) | influence | | | HoldCallIn-Network | +| InitialDP | (q) | - | - | | InitialDP | +| InitiateCallAttempt | (r) | influence | influence | | InitiateCall-Attempt | +| ManageTriggerData | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | ManageTriggerData | +| MergeCallSegments | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | MergeCallSegments | +| MoveCallSegments | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | MoveCall-Segments | +| MoveLeg | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | Moveleg | +| Reconnect | (r) | - | - *) ffs | (INAP CS-2) | Reconnect | +| ReleaseCall | (r) | influence | influence | | ReleaseCall | +| ReportUTSI | (q) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | ReportUTSI | + +**Table 7-20/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call Table (continued)** + +| Interface primitives | T_SCF CONTROL (q/r) | IBI signal (e/f) | T_SIGNAL CONTROL (h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|-----------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| +| RequestCurrent-StatusReport | (r) | - | - | | RequestCurrent-StatusReport | +| RequestEveryStatus-ChangeReport | (r) | - | - | | RequestEvery-ChangeReport | +| RequestFirstStatus-MatchReport | (r) | - | - | | RequestFirst-MatchReport | +| RequestNotification-ChargingEvent | (r) | influence *) | -*) | *)Treatment is national network specific | RequestNotification-ChargingEvent | +| RequestReport-BCSMEEvent | (r) | -influence | -influence | E.g. request for midCall events | RequestReport-BCSMEEvent | +| RequestReportUTSI | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | RequestReportUTSI | +| RequestReport-FacilityEvent | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | RequestReport-FacilityEvent | +| ResetTimer | (r) | - | - | | ResetTimer | +| SelectFacility | (r) | influence | influence | resumes terminating basic call processing to select line | SelectFacility | +| SendCharging-Information | (r) | influence | - | | SendCharging-Information | +| SendFacility-Information | (r) | influence | influence | | | +| SendSTUI | (r) | influence | influence | (INAP CS-2) | SendSTUI | +| ServiceFiltering-Response | (q) | - | - | | ServiceFiltering-Response | +| SplitLeg | (r) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | SplitLeg | +| TAnswer | (q) | - | - | (DP specific) | TAnswer | + +**Table 7-20/Q.1229 – Primitive Signals, mapping to SCF Agent Protocols, Terminating Half Call Table (concluded)** + +| Interface primitives | T_SCF CONTROL (q/r) | IBI signal (e/f) | T_SIGNAL CONTROL (h/g) | Information notes | Agent Protocols INAP (k/l) | +|----------------------------|---------------------|------------------|------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------| +| TBusy | (q) | - | - | (DP specific) | TBusy | +| TDisconnect | (q) | - | - | (DP specific) | TDisconnect | +| TerminationAttempt | (q) | - | - | (INAP CS-2) | TerminationAttempt | +| TermAttempt-
Authorized | (q) | - | - | (DP specific) | TermAttempt-
Authorized | +| TMidCall | (q) | - | - | (DP specific) | TMidCall | + +**Table 7-21/Q.1229 – Mapping of IBI Signalling Events to Signalling Messages** + +| IBI Signalling Semantics | SETUP req. ind (e) | SETUP resp. conf. (f) | CALL-PROGRESS req. ind. (f) | CALL-PROGRESS req.ind (Alerting) (f) | RELEASE req. ind. (e, f) | +|-----------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| Request for connection | X | | | | | +| Connection accepted by user | | X | | | | +| Call info complete | | X | X | X | | +| Called user being alerted | | | | X | | +| Connection unavailable | | | | | X | +| Request to terminate call | | | | | X | + +#### 7.2.3.9 INAP addressing: How to do it and why + +Each FE instance specified in the Intelligent Network series of Recommendations must have a unique INAP address. This address must contain the address elements (refer to 18.2.2.1.1/Q.1228) which must be presented to the lower layer network services (TC, SCCP, MTP) in order for the INAP message PDUs to be correctly transferred between communicating FEs. For international internetwork operations to succeed, the INAP address of each of the FEs involved in the operation must be known to the networks involved in transferring the operation messages. + +For IN CS-1 (1995), these internetworking interfaces are: + +- SCF-SDF + +For IN CS-2 (1997), these internetworking interfaces are: + +- SCF-SDF +- SDF-SDF +- SCF-SCF. + +At the INAP level the internetwork relationship can be represented as shown in Figure 7-42. + +![Diagram of INAP internetwork connection between FEs. It shows two FE instances, FE_A and FE_F, connected by a thick horizontal line representing the INAP level. FE_A is on the left, connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'A' at the bottom. FE_F is on the right, connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'F' at the bottom. The connection between FE_A and FE_F is labeled 'INAP Network 1' on the left and 'INAP Network 2' on the right, separated by a vertical dashed line. Above the diagram, the word 'Protocol' is written, and 'INAP' is written next to the FE_A circle. A small code 'T11100080-98' is in the bottom right corner.](9f9fdebeade37ad92fdd68d6ea9f58ce_img.jpg) + +Diagram of INAP internetwork connection between FEs. It shows two FE instances, FE\_A and FE\_F, connected by a thick horizontal line representing the INAP level. FE\_A is on the left, connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'A' at the bottom. FE\_F is on the right, connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'F' at the bottom. The connection between FE\_A and FE\_F is labeled 'INAP Network 1' on the left and 'INAP Network 2' on the right, separated by a vertical dashed line. Above the diagram, the word 'Protocol' is written, and 'INAP' is written next to the FE\_A circle. A small code 'T11100080-98' is in the bottom right corner. + +Figure 7-42/Q.1229 – INAP internetwork connection between FEs + +Table 7-22 identifies the permissible FE types for each of the relevant IN capability sets: + +Table 7-22/Q.1229 – Permissible FEs for internetwork operations + +| Capability Set | FE A | FE F | +|----------------|-------------------|-------------------| +| IN CS-1 (1995) | SCF | SDF | +| IN CS-2 (1997) | SCF
SDF
SCF | SDF
SDF
SCF | + +##### 7.2.3.9.1 Mapping of INAP FEs to SCCP subsystems + +INAP uses the addressing services of the lower layer network services [TC, SCCP, MTP] to ensure the correct delivery of INAP PDU messages. Since TC does not manipulate any of the addressing elements, it is in effect the SCCP address parameters which will control how INAP messages are handled for message delivery. Each INAP network node will contain a single SCCP layer which handles the routing of network messages. The SCCP will deliver messages to an identified subsystem (which is addressed by a subsystem number, SSN). This subsystem corresponds to an Application Entity (AE) which contains the TC ASE plus all of the application layer function ASEs to be performed in the node. + +Recommendation Q.1225 contains the agreed set of mappings of FEs to physical network nodes for IN CS-2 (1997). It is possible for IN network nodes to contain one or more FEs. The mapping of these FEs into specific AE types which can be addressed as subsystems by the SCCP has not been standardized and may in fact be implementation dependent. Figure 7-43 shows possible mappings of FEs to AEs and the effect this has on the SCCP addressing. The configurations shown are not considered to be exhaustive. + +It should be noted that a FE (as used in IN terminology) is equivalent to an AE (as defined in Recommendation Q.1400; in Figure 7-43 the model ii) shows the example where AE type (FE type) can have two different applications of the same type in one node. + +![Figure 7-43: Possible mappings of FEs to AEs. The diagram shows three configurations: i) Single FE per node, ii) Multiple FE per node [config 1], and iii) Multiple FE per node [config 2]. Each configuration shows the mapping of FEs to AEs, TCAP, and SCCP layers.](b0b9bc3067d012eb2fa3539217b9c34d_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates three possible mappings of Functional Entities (FEs) to Application Entities (AEs) and their impact on the SCCP addressing structure. The layers shown from top to bottom are INAP, TCAP, and SCCP, separated by dashed lines. + +- i) Single FE per node:** A single FEA is mapped to an AE(A). This AE(A) is connected to a TCAPA, which is in turn connected to an SCCPA via an SSN(A). +- ii) Multiple FE per node [config 1]:** Two FEs, FEA1 and FEA2, are both mapped to a single AE(A). This AE(A) is connected to a single TCAPA, which is connected to an SCCPA via an SSN(A). +- iii) Multiple FE per node [config 2]:** FEA1 is mapped to AE(A1) and FEA2 is mapped to AE(A2). AE(A1) is connected to TCAPA1, which is connected to an SCCPA via an SSN(A1). AE(A2) is connected to TCAPA2, which is connected to the same SCCPA via an SSN(A2). + +A small text label "T11100090-98" is present at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Figure 7-43: Possible mappings of FEs to AEs. The diagram shows three configurations: i) Single FE per node, ii) Multiple FE per node [config 1], and iii) Multiple FE per node [config 2]. Each configuration shows the mapping of FEs to AEs, TCAP, and SCCP layers. + +Figure 7-43/Q.1229 – Possible mappings of FEs to AEs + +##### 7.2.3.9.2 Interconnection of INAP nodes for internetworking + +The INAP addresses are constrained to fit into the SCCP Called Party Address structure defined in Recommendation Q.713. However, to fully realize the consequences of selecting a specific form of this address for INAP internetworking use, we need to examine the full physical level interaction between INAP and the lower layer routing functions. + +An example internetwork configuration showing this is given in Figure 7-44. + +The configuration in Figure 7-44 was chosen because it is the simplest network configuration which illustrates the minimum requirements for international internetwork operations. While other configurations are possible they would not simplify the requirements imposed on the addressing needs for INAP operations. + +![Diagram illustrating the model for internetwork connection between FE_A and FE_F across INAP Network 1 and INAP Network 2. The diagram shows protocol layers (INAP, TCAP, SCCP, MTP) and network equipment nodes (A-F) connected via message transfer paths.](fda85db2e355bb8e3edcd5a74bf3d673_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the protocol stack and network topology for a connection between two foreign exchange (FE) nodes, FEA and FEF. + +- Protocol Layers:** + - INAP:** Contains FEA and FEF (represented by ovals). + - TCAP:** Contains TCAPA and TCAPF (represented by rectangles). + - SCCP:** Contains SCCPA, SCCPBC, SCCPDE, and SCCPF (represented by rectangles). + - MTP:** Contains MTPA, MTPB, MTPC, MTPD, MTPE, and MTPF (represented by rectangles). +- Network Equipment Nodes:** + - Node A:** A Network Equipment Node containing FEA, TCAPA, SCCPA, and MTPA. + - Node B:** Part of INAP Network 1, containing MTPB. + - Node C:** Part of INAP Network 1, containing MTPC. + - Node D:** Part of INAP Network 2, containing MTPD. + - Node E:** Part of INAP Network 2, containing MTPE. + - Node F:** A Network Equipment Node containing FEF, TCAPF, SCCPF, and MTPF. +- Connections:** + - FEA is connected to TCAPA, which is connected to SCCPA, which is connected to MTPA. + - FEF is connected to TCAPF, which is connected to SCCPF, which is connected to MTPF. + - MTPA is connected to MTPB. + - MTPB and MTPC are part of a common SCCPBC node. + - MTPC is connected to MTPD. + - MTPD and MTPE are part of a common SCCPDE node. + - MTPE is connected to MTPF. +- Boundaries:** + - Network/Protocol Boundary:** Indicated by dashed horizontal lines between layers. + - Network Addressing Point:** Indicated by dashed vertical lines separating the networks. + - INAP Network 1:** Includes nodes A, B, and C. + - INAP Network 2:** Includes nodes D, E, and F. + +**Legend:** + +- Message transfer path +- - - - Network/Protocol Boundary +- - - - Network Addressing Point +- ▭ Network Equipment Node + +T11100930-98 + +Diagram illustrating the model for internetwork connection between FE\_A and FE\_F across INAP Network 1 and INAP Network 2. The diagram shows protocol layers (INAP, TCAP, SCCP, MTP) and network equipment nodes (A-F) connected via message transfer paths. + +**Figure 7-44/Q.1229 – Model for internetwork connection between FEs** + +##### 7.2.3.9.3 Address Mapping during message transfer + +To illustrate the mapping of addressing parameters between the different protocol networks, the establishment of a TC dialogue between FEA and FEF will be examined. + +The format used for the messages uses the parameters defined in the appropriate Recommendations. The values of the parameters which affect the addressing requirements are in **bold** typeface. Table 7-23 defines the abbreviations used for the parameters in the messages. + +**Table 7-23/Q.1229 – Abbreviations for element values for message events** + +| Parameter | Description | Protocol | +|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +| QoS | Quality of Service (as defined in 3.1.2.1/Q.771) | TC | +| ac(X) | Application Context name value X (ASN.1 object id) | TC | +| dtid(X) | Destination Transaction ID value X (as defined in 3.1/Q.773) | TC | +| otid(X) | Originating Transaction ID value X (as defined in 3.1/Q.773) | TC | +| BEGIN{X} | TC Message BEGIN (ASN.1 defined in 3.1 and 3.2/Q.773) | TC | +| CONTINUE{X} | TC Message CONTINUE (ASN.1 defined in 3.1 and 3.2/Q.773) | TC | +| dialogue{X} | TC message dialogue portion (ASN.1 defined in 3.2/Q.773) | TC | +| components(X) | TC message components portion (defined in 4.2.2/Q.773) | TC | +| tid(X) | Transaction ID (Dialogue ID) value X (Q.771) | TC | +| UI | User Information (defined in 4.2.3/Q.772) | TC | +| adrX(Z) | SCCP address value X (defined in 3.4/Q.713)
X = S for primitive (SDU) where formatting is not specified
X = P for protocol (PDU) where formatting is specified | SCCP | +| class() | Protocol Class (as defined in 3.6/Q.713) | SCCP | +| gt(X) | Global Title value X (as defined in 3.4.2.3/Q.713) | SCCP | +| hc() | Hop Counter (as defined in 3.18/Q.713) | SCCP | +| pc(X) | Point Code value X (as defined in 3.4.2.1/Q.713) | SCCP | +| Ret | Return option (as defined in 6.2.2.2.3/Q.711) | SCCP | +| rgt | route on GT | SCCP | +| rpc | route on SSN | SCCP | +| X(L)(X)UDT{X} | SCCP Message X(L)(X)UDT value X (format defined in 4.10/Q.713 for UDT, 4.18/Q.713 for XUDT and 4.20/Q.713 for LUDT) | SCCP | +| seg(X) | Segmentation value X (defined in 3.17/Q.713) | SCCP | +| Seq | Sequencing (defined in 6.2.2.2.2/Q.711) | SCCP | +| ssn(X) | SSN value X (as defined in 3.4.2.2/Q.713) | SCCP | +| dpc(X) | Destination Point Code value X (as defined in 2.2/Q.704) | MTP | +| opc(X) | Originating Point Code value X (as defined in 2.2/Q.704) | MTP | +| sio(N,X) | Service Information Octet with Network Indicator value N and Service Indicator value X (as defined in 14.2/Q.704) | MTP | +| sls(X) | Signalling Link Selection value X (as defined in 2.2/Q.704) | MTP | + +In the subsequent clauses, a value of (?) indicates that the value is set by mechanisms contained within the specific protocol. In addition, values denoted by {...} indicate that while the value may be affected by INAP it contains no information which is relevant to the issue of INAP addressing. + +###### 7.2.3.9.3.1 Address format for INAP + +INAP is required to provide sufficient information to ensure that the SCCP calling and called party addresses are constructed correctly. + +For further information, refer to Recommendations Q.713 and Q.714. + +###### 7.2.3.9.3.2 Addressing from INAP to TC + +INAP uses the TC-User services of TC to transfer messages between INAP FEs. + +The TC-User services only require addressing information to be provided during the establishment of a TC dialogue between the two end TC-Users. Addresses are carried in the TC-BEGIN primitive (originating address and destination address) and in the first TC-CONTINUE primitive (originating address). Because TC does not specify any address manipulation, the form of these addresses must be compatible with the SCCP addresses used in the layer below TC. The originating address parameter values in both the TC-BEGIN and the first TC-CONTINUE must be unambiguous in that they must uniquely identify the respective TC nodes. + +In addition to the address information, the dialogue establishment uses an application context name (AC) which is used to identify the set (and direction) of operations which can be transported by the dialogue. + +The IN Physical plane (Recommendations Q.1215 and Q.1225) allows for the co-location of a number of INAP FEs within a single network equipment node. It is the responsibility of the "glue" between TC and the specific FE (as contained within the SACF/MACF functions) to associate incoming TC dialogues (indicated by a TC-BEGIN.ind primitive) with the appropriate FE. + +From the parameters provided by the TC-User service, the SACF/MACF can perform this function by examining the destination address elements and/or the AC. For example: + +- 1) The destination FE can be determined from the destination address, one for each FE at the node. + +This implies that each equipment node will potentially require multiple INAP addresses. + +- 2) The destination FE can be determined from the value of the AC (after the address has been used to deliver the message to the SCCP subsystem) e.g. for message routing from an SCF to SDF, then the SDF node examining the AC (SCF-SDF) knows the message is for the destination SDF FE. + +This implies that each equipment node will require only a single address and that the AC can uniquely identify the destination FE. Note that this method will not work if more than one FE of a particular type (e.g. two or more SCFs) are co-located in the same equipment node. + +For the example in Figure 7-44, the TC level information exchange is detailed in Table 7-24. The information flows for this exchange are shown in Figure 7-45. + +**Table 7-24/Q.1229 – Message definitions for TC level message exchange** + +| Step | From | To | Message format | +|------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | FE A | TC A | TC-BEGIN.req ( QoS, adrS(inap[FE-F1]), ac(AF), adrS(inap[FE-A]), tid(A1), UI); | +| 2 | TC A | TC F | BEGIN{ otid(A1), dialogue { ac(AF), UI, ... }, component { ... } }; | +| 3 | TC F | FE F | TC-BEGIN.ind ( QoS, adrS(inap[FE-F4]), ac(AF), adrS(inap[FE-A]), tid(F1), UI); | +| 4 | FE F | TC F | TC-CONTINUE.req ( QoS, adrS(inap[FE-F]), ac(AF), tid(F1), UI); | +| 5 | TC F | TC A | CONTINUE{ otid(F1), dtid(A1), dialogue { ac(AF), UI, ... }, component { ... } }; | +| 6 | TC A | FE A | TC-CONTINUE.ind ( QoS, , tid(A1), UI); | + +NOTE – In steps 2 and 5 the TC data is transferred using the services of the SCCP. + +![Sequence diagram showing information flows for TC level message exchange between INAP FE_A, TCAP_A, TCAP_F, and INAP FE_F. The sequence of messages is: 1. TC-BEGIN from INAP FE_A to TCAP_A; 2. BEGIN from TCAP_A to TCAP_F; 3. TC-BEGIN from TCAP_F to INAP FE_F; 4. TC-CONTINUE from INAP FE_F to TCAP_F; 5. CONTINUE from TCAP_F to TCAP_A; 6. TC-CONTINUE from TCAP_A to INAP FE_A. A label T11100110-98 is at the bottom right.](6ca842602b0473809416a9cf0d4106a4_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant INAP_FE_A as INAP FEA + participant TCAP_A as TCAPA + participant TCAP_F as TCAPF + participant INAP_FE_F as INAP FEF + Note right of INAP_FE_F: T11100110-98 + INAP_FE_A->>TCAP_A: TC-BEGIN (1) + TCAP_A->>TCAP_F: BEGIN (2) + TCAP_F->>INAP_FE_F: TC-BEGIN (3) + INAP_FE_F->>TCAP_F: TC-CONTINUE (4) + TCAP_F->>TCAP_A: CONTINUE (5) + TCAP_A->>INAP_FE_A: TC-CONTINUE (6) + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing information flows for TC level message exchange between INAP FE\_A, TCAP\_A, TCAP\_F, and INAP FE\_F. The sequence of messages is: 1. TC-BEGIN from INAP FE\_A to TCAP\_A; 2. BEGIN from TCAP\_A to TCAP\_F; 3. TC-BEGIN from TCAP\_F to INAP FE\_F; 4. TC-CONTINUE from INAP FE\_F to TCAP\_F; 5. CONTINUE from TCAP\_F to TCAP\_A; 6. TC-CONTINUE from TCAP\_A to INAP FE\_A. A label T11100110-98 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-45/Q.1229 – Information flows for TC level message exchange** + +The TC-BEGIN primitive requires the following parameters relating to addressing: + +| | | +|--------------------------|----------------------------| +| originating address | adrS( inap[FE-A] ) | +| destination address | adrS( inap[FE-F1] ) | +| application context name | ac( AF ) | + +The initial TC-CONTINUE primitive requires the following parameter relating to addressing: + +| | | +|---------------------|---------------------------| +| originating address | adrS( inap[FE-F] ) | +|---------------------|---------------------------| + +These address parameters have the following constraints on their values: + +- **inap[FE-F1]**, **inap[FE-A]** and **inap[FE-F]** must conform2 to the SCCP address formats (see 7.2.3.9.3.1). +- **inap[FE-F1]** is an address which must map to a set of INAP FEs that provide identical INAP functionality. The selection of which FE actually performs the required function is left to the SCCP layer to determine. +- **inap[FE-A]** and **inap[FE-F]** must unambiguously identify the TC nodes in the international IN address space. If the AC is not used to determine the destination FE, then the addresses must unambiguously identify the individual INAP FEs. +- **AF** must take the value of one of the INAP ACs defined for the specific internetworking interface being used (SCF-SDF, SDF-SDF, SCF-SCF). + +###### 7.2.3.9.3.3 Addressing from TC to SCCP + +TC uses the N-UNITDATA service of the SCCP-User services of SCCP to transfer messages between TC nodes. Addresses are carried by this service in the *called party address* and the *calling party address* parameters. Once in the SCCP network, messages are routed between SCCP nodes until the destination SCCP node is reached. This routing is performed in one of two ways: + +- *route on GT*, the global title translation has to derive just a point code at all but the last translation (at the last translation additionally a SSN is identified, either from GT translation or by using the SSN possibly included as a separate address element in the called party address). Exceptionally a translation may also produce a new destination called party address, but in this case it should be noted that the application's ability to act on messages that are returned on error by the SCCP may be affected. + +2 While primitives do not specify exact formats, they must contain the information elements required to populate the SCCP formatted addresses. + +- *route on SSN*, which results in the message being transferred to the specified subsystem at the end SCCP node. Once this form of routing is selected, for example in the output from a Global Title Translation (GTT) function, then no further address translations are permitted. + +As there is the possibility of duplication of point codes between networks, messages that cross network boundaries are required to be routed according to GT, at least up to the last translation node. When messages cross the international boundary, the allowed formats of the address parameters are restricted according to the rules detailed in Annex B/Q.713. See also Recommendation Q.715 (SCCP user guide). In particular the use of *route on SSN* for SCCP message routing in the originating network is only possible if the originating node is in the international network and if: + +- the final destination SCCP node is visible in the international SCCP network; +- there is a standardized non-zero SSN value for the INAP service. + +It is possible to satisfy condition a) by co-locating the INAP/TC node with the international SCCP node. However, given the limited number of international SCCP addresses available to individual network providers3, it is more likely that network configurations similar to that shown in Figure 7-44 will be used. + +It is therefore mandatory, even where condition a) is met, to use the route on GT mechanism. + +For the example in Figure 7-44 the SCCP level message exchange is detailed in Table 7-25. The information flows for this message exchange are shown in Figure 7-46. The XUDT message was used for this example and, although other SCCP message formats could be used (e.g. UDT, LUDT). It should be noted that currently only UDT messages are widely supported. + +![Sequence diagram showing information flows for SCCP level message exchange between TCAP_A, SCCP_A, SCCP_BC, SCCP_DE, SCCP_F, and TCAP_F. The diagram shows a request-response exchange where TCAP_A sends an N-UNITDATA (2.1) to SCCP_A, which then routes it via XUDT messages (2.2, 2.3, 2.4) through intermediate nodes to SCCP_F, which then sends it to TCAP_F via N-UNITDATA (2.5). The return path follows N-UNITDATA (5.1) from TCAP_F to SCCP_F, then XUDT messages (5.2, 5.3, 5.4) back through the nodes to SCCP_A, which finally sends N-UNITDATA (5.5) back to TCAP_A.](0de91e9b714369b312bf3ab1853301ac_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant TCAP_A + participant SCCP_A + participant SCCP_BC + participant SCCP_DE + participant SCCP_F + participant TCAP_F + + Note right of TCAP_A: 2.1 N-UNITDATA + TCAP_A->>SCCP_A: N-UNITDATA 2.1 + Note right of SCCP_A: 2.2 XUDT + SCCP_A->>SCCP_BC: XUDT 2.2 + Note right of SCCP_BC: 2.3 XUDT + SCCP_BC->>SCCP_DE: XUDT 2.3 + Note right of SCCP_DE: 2.4 XUDT + SCCP_DE->>SCCP_F: XUDT 2.4 + Note right of SCCP_F: 2.5 N-UNITDATA + SCCP_F->>TCAP_F: N-UNITDATA 2.5 + + Note right of TCAP_F: 5.1 N-UNITDATA + TCAP_F->>SCCP_F: N-UNITDATA 5.1 + Note right of SCCP_F: 5.2 XUDT + SCCP_F->>SCCP_DE: XUDT 5.2 + Note right of SCCP_DE: 5.3 XUDT + SCCP_DE->>SCCP_BC: XUDT 5.3 + Note right of SCCP_BC: 5.4 XUDT + SCCP_BC->>SCCP_A: XUDT 5.4 + Note right of SCCP_A: 5.5 N-UNITDATA + SCCP_A->>TCAP_A: N-UNITDATA 5.5 + +``` + +T11100120-98 + +Sequence diagram showing information flows for SCCP level message exchange between TCAP\_A, SCCP\_A, SCCP\_BC, SCCP\_DE, SCCP\_F, and TCAP\_F. The diagram shows a request-response exchange where TCAP\_A sends an N-UNITDATA (2.1) to SCCP\_A, which then routes it via XUDT messages (2.2, 2.3, 2.4) through intermediate nodes to SCCP\_F, which then sends it to TCAP\_F via N-UNITDATA (2.5). The return path follows N-UNITDATA (5.1) from TCAP\_F to SCCP\_F, then XUDT messages (5.2, 5.3, 5.4) back through the nodes to SCCP\_A, which finally sends N-UNITDATA (5.5) back to TCAP\_A. + +**Figure 7-46/Q.1229 – Information flows for SCCP level message exchange** + +3 As defined in Recommendation Q.708. + +**Table 7-25/Q.1229 – Message definitions for SCCP level message exchange** + +| Step | From | To | Message format | +|------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2.1 | TC A | SCCP A | N-UNITDATA.req (adrS( inap[FE-F1] ), adrS( inap[FE-A] ), Seq, Ret, Imp, BEGIN{...} ); | +| | | GTT A | inap[FE-F1] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Network 1), dpc( B ), adrP( inap[FE-F2] ) } | +| 2.2 | SCCP A | SCCP BC | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-F2] ), adrP( inap[FE-A] ), BEGIN{...}, ...} | +| | | GTT BC | inap[FE-F2] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Int Nw), dpc( D ), adrP( inap[FE-F3] ) } | +| 2.3 | SCCP BC | SCCP DE | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-F3] ), adrP( inap[FE-A] ), BEGIN{...}, ...} | +| | | GTT DE | inap[FE-F3] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Network 2), dpc( F ), adrP( inap[FE-F4] ) } | +| 2.4 | SCCP DE | SCCP F | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-F4] ), adrP( inap[FE-A] ), BEGIN{...}, ...} | +| 2.5 | SCCP F | TC F | N-UNITDATA.ind (adrS( inap[FE-F4] ), adrS( inap[FE-A] ), Seq, Ret, Imp, BEGIN { ... } ); | +| 5.1 | TC F | SCCP F | N-UNITDATA.req (adrS( inap[FE-A] ), adrS( inap[FE-F] ), Seq, Ret, Imp, CONTINUE{...} ); | +| | | GTT F | inap[FE-A] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Network 2), dpc( E ), adrP( inap[FE-A2] ) } | +| 5.2 | SCCP F | SCCP DE | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-A2] ), adrP( inap[FE-F] ), CONTINUE{...}, ...} | +| | | GTT DE | inap[FE-A2] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Int Nw), dpc( C ), adrP( inap[FE-A3] ) } | +| 5.3 | SCCP DE | SCCP BC | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-A3] ), adrP( inap[FE-F] ), CONTINUE{...}, ...} | +| | | GTT BC | inap[FE-A3] translates to { MTP-SAPi(MTP Network 1), dpc( A ), adrP( inap[FE-A4] ) } | +| 5.4 | SCCP BC | SCCP A | XUDT {adrP( inap[FE-A4] ), adrP( inap[FE-F] ), CONTINUE{...}, ...} | +| 5.5 | SCCP A | TC A | N-UNITDATA.ind (adrS( inap[FE-A4] ), adrS( inap[FE-F] ), Seq, Ret, Imp, CONTINUE{...} ); | + +NOTE 1 – In steps 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4, the SCCP data is transferred using the services of the MTP. + +NOTE 2 – Seq, Ret and Imp shown in steps 2.5 and 5.5 are optional. + +The N-UNITDATA primitive carrying the TC-BEGIN requires the following parameters relating to addressing: + +calling address                adrS(**inap[FE-A]**) +called address                adrS(**inap[FE-F1]**). + +Global Title Translations are performed within NodeA, NodeBC and NodeDE and possibly in Node F. Each of these translations may exceptionally produce a new called party address for use in the SCCP message transfer to the next node. These addresses (changed by the translation or not) are denoted as **inap[FE-F2]**, **inap[FE-F3]** and **inap[FE-F4]** respectively. + +The N-UNITDATA primitive carrying the first TC-CONTINUE requires the following parameters relating to addressing: + +calling address                adrS(**inap[FE-F]**) +called address                adrS(**inap[FE-A]**) + +For more details about the information contained in the called and calling addresses, refer to Appendix II. + +It should be noted that Table 7-25 is in need of modification. It would be useful to clarify that address elements indicated as contained in a parameter of an "adrS" are not literal, but instead represent information that maps to the equivalent address element in a parameter of an "adrP". + +###### 7.2.3.9.3.4 Addressing from SCCP to MTP + +SCCP uses the MTP-TRANSFER service of the MTP-User services of MTP to transfer messages between SCCP nodes. Addresses are carried by this service in the origin point code and the destination point code parameters. + +For the example in Figure 7-44 the MTP level message exchanges are detailed in Table 7-26. The information flows for this message exchange are shown in Figure 7-47. + +![Sequence diagram showing information flows for example MTP level message exchange between SCCP_X, MTP_X, MTP_Y, and SCCP_Y. The flow is: SCCP_X sends MTP-TRANSFER.req to MTP_X; MTP_X sends MSU to MTP_Y; MTP_Y sends MTP-TRANSFER.ind to SCCP_Y. A label T11100130-98 is at the bottom right.](26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCCP_X + participant MTP_X + participant MTP_Y + participant SCCP_Y + Note right of SCCP_Y: T11100130-98 + SCCP_X->>MTP_X: MTP-TRANSFER.req + MTP_X->>MTP_Y: MSU + MTP_Y->>SCCP_Y: MTP-TRANSFER.ind + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing information flows for example MTP level message exchange between SCCP\_X, MTP\_X, MTP\_Y, and SCCP\_Y. The flow is: SCCP\_X sends MTP-TRANSFER.req to MTP\_X; MTP\_X sends MSU to MTP\_Y; MTP\_Y sends MTP-TRANSFER.ind to SCCP\_Y. A label T11100130-98 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-47/Q.1229 – Information flows for example MTP level message exchange** + +**Table 7-26/Q.1229 – Message definitions for SCCP level message exchange** + +| Step | From | To | Message format | +|-------|--------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2.2.1 | SCCP A | MTP A | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(A), dpc(B), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 2.2.2 | MTP A | MTP B | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(B), opc(A), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 2.2.3 | MTP B | SCCP BC | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(A), dpc(B), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 2.3.1 | SCCP BC | MTP C | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(C), dpc(D), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 2.3.2 | MTP C | MTP D | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(D), opc(C), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 2.3.3 | MTP D | SCCP DE | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(C), dpc(D), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 2.4.1 | SCCP DE | MTP E | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(E), dpc(F), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 2.4.2 | MTP E | MTP F | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(F), opc(D), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 2.4.3 | MTP F | SCCP F | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(E), dpc(F), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.2.1 | SCCP F | MTP F | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(F), dpc(E), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.2.2 | MTP F | MTP E | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(E), opc(F), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 5.2.3 | MTP E | SCCP DE | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(F), dpc(E), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.3.1 | SCCP DE | MTP D | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(D), dpc(C), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.3.2 | MTP D | MTP C | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(C), opc(D), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 5.3.3 | MTP C | SCCP BC | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(D), dpc(C), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.4.1 | SCCP BC | MTP B | MTP-TRANSFER.req ( opc(B), dpc(A), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | +| 5.4.2 | MTP B | MTP A | MSU { sio(?,3), dpc(A), opc(B), sls(?), XUDT{...} }; | +| 5.4.3 | MTP A | SCCP A | MTP-TRANSFER.ind ( opc(B), dpc(A), sls(?), sio(?,3), XUDT{...} ); | + +The point code values required have the following constraints: + +- pc(A), pc(B) are standard point codes (3.4.2.1/Q.713) defined by the provider of MTP Network 1. +- pc(C), pc(D) are international signalling point codes as defined in Recommendation Q.708. +- pc(E), pc(F) are standard point codes (3.4.2.1/Q.713) defined by the provider of MTP Network 2. + +##### 7.2.3.9.4 Summary of Protocol Requirements for INAP Addressing + +The following requirements can be identified for the different protocols used to carry INAP internetwork messages: + +###### **7.2.3.9.4.1 Requirements on INAP** + +- 1) If Application Contexts (ACs) are to be used for FE differentiation, then the values assigned to the INAP AC must uniquely identify the destination FE. + +This requirement applies to all interfaces, not just those used for internetworking. + +- 2) If AC values are not used for FE differentiation, then an agreed format for the Global Title must be defined at the INAP level for international addressing. + +These may conform to the formats specified in B.4.3/Q.713 or B.4.4/Q.713. If an alternative numbering scheme is required, then this must be forwarded to ITU-T for inclusion in a future revision of Annex B/Q.713. + +###### **7.2.3.9.4.2 Requirements on TC** + +- 1) If Application Contexts (ACs) are to be used for FE differentiation within a physical node, then the version of TC used must support the dialogue portion of TC (i.e. 1993 revision of TC). + +This requirement applies to all interfaces, not just those used for internetworking. + +###### **7.2.3.9.4.3 Requirements on SCCP** + +- 1) The network provider must ensure that any change of GT value during translation preserves any INAP specific information contained in the initial GT value. + +This requirement applies to all interfaces, not just those used for internetworking. + +- 2) If route on SSN is to be supported from the originating node, then a non-zero internationally standardized SSN is required for international internetworking (currently not agreed and not standardized). + +NOTE 1 – For this the originating node is also required to be in the international network. + +In the absence of a standardized non-zero SSN for INAP services, the use of route on GT is mandatory from the origin node to the network containing the destination node where network boundaries are crossed. + +- 3) The version of SCCP used to support INAP operations must be at least SCCP 1993 if segmentation/reassembly of messages is required to be performed by the SCCP. The need for SCCP 1996 (for improved congestion control mechanisms) is still to be determined. + +NOTE 2 – At present SCCP 1993 is not widely supported. As a consequence, INAP operations that cross network boundaries should not assume SCCP 1993 capability. + +The SCCP requirements are those required to support INAP operations. Currently there is nothing being done on determining the requirements of INAP Management. + +SCCP Management consists of a number of services (N-COORD, N-STATE, N-PCSTATE) all of which will be presented to the INAP message interface. These services allow the user to notify the SCCP of the availability of subsystems within the SCCP. + +Since the use of these services requires the specification of a non-zero subsystem number, they currently cannot be used for INAP management operations in international internetworking situations. + +It should be noted that current SCCP 1996 is not particularly clear on the management procedures involving multiple SCCP networks. + +###### **7.2.3.9.4.4 Requirements on MTP** + +There are no INAP specific requirements of the parameters of the MTP. Existing MTP requirements for international addressing are sufficient. + +##### 7.2.3.9.5 Implications for network providers + +In this subclause some of the implications of the requirements identified in 7.2.3.9.3.1 for network providers will be examined. + +###### 7.2.3.9.5.1 Effect of Addressing on message payload + +The carriage of INAP messages between nodes is subject to the message size limitations imposed by the lower layers used. Currently, INAP uses a protocol stack as shown in Figure 7-48. + +![Figure 7-48/Q.1229 – INAP Protocol Stack diagram showing layers INAP, TCAP, SCCP, and MTP on the left, and their corresponding message structures on the right: INAP Operation, TC-Message, (L)(X)UDT, and MSU. A reference code T11100140-98 is present.](50a63fe40eaa16cb8745c689fe8f8264_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the INAP protocol stack. On the left, four boxes represent the protocol layers: INAP, TCAP, SCCP, and MTP, stacked vertically. On the right, four corresponding message structures are shown, also stacked vertically. The top structure is labeled 'INAP Operation' and consists of a white header and a grey payload. The second structure is labeled 'TC-Message' and contains the 'INAP Operation' message. The third structure is labeled '(L)(X)UDT' and contains the 'TC-Message'. The bottom structure is labeled 'MSU' and contains the '(L)(X)UDT' message. A reference code 'T11100140-98' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Figure 7-48/Q.1229 – INAP Protocol Stack diagram showing layers INAP, TCAP, SCCP, and MTP on the left, and their corresponding message structures on the right: INAP Operation, TC-Message, (L)(X)UDT, and MSU. A reference code T11100140-98 is present. + +Figure 7-48/Q.1229 – INAP Protocol Stack + +The available versions of the lower protocols are shown below: + +TCAP: TCAP 1988, TCAP 1993 + +SCCP: SCCP 1988, SCCP 1993, SCCP 1996 + +MTP: MTP 1988, MTP 1993 + +NOTE 1 – The SCCP UDT message is available in all versions of the Recommendations. + +The SCCP XUDT message is available in the SCCP 1993 and SCCP 1996 versions of the Recommendations. + +The SCCP LUDT message is only available in the SCCP 1996 version of the Recommendations. + +Table 7-27 summarizes the maximum message payload sizes for user defined portions of the various SCCP protocol used: + +Table 7-27/Q.1229 – Maximum size (octets) for Addresses + User Data in SCCP messages + +| SCCP message | Blue Book SCCP | SCCP 1993 | SCCP 1996 | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------|-----------| +| UDT | 260 | 260 | 260 | +| XUDT (single) | – | 2587 | 254 | +| XUDT (multiple) a) | – | 251 | 248 | +| LUDT | – | – | 3968 | +| a) A maximum of 16 XUDT messages can be used to carry User Data. | | | | + +In each case, the maximum message payload contains: + +- the Addresses portion which consists of the CallingPartyAddress and CalledPartyAddress encoded according to the SCCP CalledPartyAddress formats; +- the User Data portion which consists of the encoded PDU containing the TC Message. INAP operations will be encoded into the TC Message. + +NOTE 2 – In the case where the User Data portion is carried in a number of XUDT messages, then all of the XUDT messages used will have the same address portion value. + +The length of a XUDT message4 is a combination of fixed overhead, addresses and data. The net effect on message payloads is that: + +- Addresses + part(Data) $\leq$ 248 octets for segmented messages (data split over up to 16 XUDT messages); +- Addresses + Data $\leq$ 254 octets for non-segmented messages (data is carried in a single XUDT message). + +For international SCCP addresses, two possible alternatives are currently prescribed, either international E.164 or Generic number with Q.708 Z-UUU-V prefix. + +The maximum size of an E.164 international address is 15 digits. Using BCD encoding this puts the maximum length of an E.164 based address at 15 octets. Therefore using E.164 addresses message payload constraints are: + +- max length Data $\leq$ 224 octets for single XUDT messages; +- max length Data $\leq$ 3456 octets for multiple XUDT messages using segmentation. + +The maximum size of the Generic number depends on the contents of the national portion. The fixed part of the address for this form requires 9 octets. In this case there must be agreement between the network providers as to the maximum address length in order to ensure that data is not lost due to changes in the address size (refer to 7.2.3.9.5.2). + +###### 7.2.3.9.5.2 Effect of Addressing on Global Title Translation tables + +Currently SCCP GTT routing must be used to direct international internetworking traffic. + +At each translation point the SCCP may exceptionally generate a new called party address for the message being transferred. It is therefore possible for the size of the address to change as the SCCP message is passed from node to node. If at one of these translation points the new size of the address is such that the SCCP message can no longer fit into the MTP payload, then the delivery of the message will fail. Network operators should ensure that sufficient space in the SCCP message is provided by the initial SCCP node to carry the maximum sized address. + +Additionally, in the absence of any requirement about the use of the TC level AC to determine the destination INAP FE, it would be prudent for the network operator to assume that the GT portion of any SCCP contains information required by the INAP. This would require that the GT portion of each address should be preserved during the translation process including the last translation node, which will require careful population and management of the GTT tables in each SCCP node. Particular care must be taken in the case where the SCCP is used to select one of a set of nodes used to provide the same service. In this case the network provider must ensure that the change of GT value preserves the INAP specific information contained in the initial GT value. + +While a SCCP node performing GTT on a message could modify only the called party address of the message, the first international gateway SCCP node may also modify the calling party address in order to make it conform to international requirements. In this case the network provider must ensure that any INAP related information is retained during the modification and that the resulting address is still unambiguous (i.e. it only identifies a single entity in the network). + +##### 7.2.3.9.6 INAP Address Format for international interworking + +The two alternatives for INAP addresses for international internetworking are: + +- 1) Global Title type 4 containing E.164 address with Translation Type = 0; + +--- + +4 As used in the example in 7.2.3.9.3. + +2) Global Title type 4 containing Generic Number with Q.708 prefix and Translation Type = 2. + +Because of the potential need to address multiple instances of a particular type of INAP FE (e.g. multiple special purpose SDFs) within a specific network node, it is necessary for the GT portion of the SCCP address to identify uniquely the INAP FE being addressed. + +For a GT containing an E.164 address this effectively mandates that each instance of an INAP FE has its own nationally significant E.164 address. + +The alternative to assigning an E.164 address to each INAP FE is to use a GT based on the Generic number plan version of the international SCCP address. Applying INAP requirements to such a generic number should result in a global title of the form: + +ZUUUV NNNNNN FF + +where ZUUUV is the Q.708 portion, NNNNN is the national significant number which identifies the network node, FF identifies the INAP AE instance within the node. + +If this format is chosen, then it may be necessary to have a new international Translation Type and/or international SSN defined for INAP in order for INAP specific addresses (Generic Number + AP FE Suffix) to be distinguished from non-INAP specific addresses based on the generic numbering plan which could employ identical address digits. + +Figure 7-49 shows an example coding of such an address using SCCP formats. The INAP Id digits are used to address the specific INAP FE functionality within the SCCP subsystem to which the message was delivered. + +Note that in the example below, the information up to and including octet 8 is the international standardized part of the address, and octets 9-N form the non-standardized national part of the address. + +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Octet | | | | | +|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------|---|-----------------------------|---|----------|---------|-------|--|--|--|--| +| 0 | RI = 0 | GTI = 4 | | | | SSNI = 1 | PCI = 0 | 1 | | | | | +| SSN = 0 or standard SSN | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | +| Translation Type = 2 | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | +| Numbering Plan = 2 | | | | Encoding Scheme = 1, 2 or 3 | | | | 4 | | | | | +| 0 | Nature of Address indicator = 4 (International) | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | +| Q.708 U digit (most significant) | | | | Q.708 Z digit | | | | 6 | | | | | +| Q.708 U digit (least significant) | | | | Q.708 U digit | | | | 7 | | | | | +| 0 (Filler) | | | | Q.708 V digit | | | | 8 | | | | | +| National Significant Part | | | | | | | | 9 | | | | | +| National Significant Part | | | | | | | | • | | | | | +| • | | | | | | | | • | | | | | +| INAP Id digit | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| AP Id digit (least significant) | | | | AP Id digit | | | | N | | | | | + +Figure 7-49/Q.1229 – Address format for INAP FE for internetworking + +#### 7.2.3.10 IN CS-2 flow control mechanism + +This subclause summarizes the flow control mechanisms specified in the IN CS-2 Recommendations. These mechanisms may not be sufficient for some cases of IN network congestion. More advanced and effective INAP flow control mechanisms will be provided in IN CS-3 or latter IN capability sets. + +##### 7.2.3.10.1 Call Gap operation (SCF-SSF) + +The Call Gap operation allows the SCF to request the SSF to reduce traffic on the basis of service invoked, called party, calling party or a combination of these. The operation specifies a duration for which the control is to be applied and an interval between calls. + +The operation of the Call Gap traffic control mechanism is shown in Figure 7-50. + +![Sequence diagram illustrating Call Gap flow control between SCF, SSF, and CCF. The diagram shows the exchange of messages (CG, OP, CA, ST) and the resulting Call Gap intervals (Δτ) on the SSF. A legend defines the symbols: CG (callGap), CA (call attempt), OP (initialDP or DP specific), ST (switch termination), Δτ (Call Gap interval), and a shaded bar (Call Gap Duration).](9958beca8f65818eb0ff893647af94de_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between the Service Control Function (SCF), the Service Switching Function (SSF), and the Call Control Function (CCF) for Call Gap flow control. The sequence of events is as follows: + +- The SCF sends a **CG** (callGap) message to the SSF. +- The SSF responds with an **OP** (initialDP or DP specific) message to the SCF. +- The SCF sends another **OP** message to the SSF. +- The SSF sends a **CA** (call attempt) message to the CCF. +- The CCF responds with a **ST** (switch termination) message to the SSF. +- The SSF sends another **CA** message to the CCF. +- The CCF responds with a **ST** message to the SSF. +- The SSF sends a final **CA** message to the CCF. + +The diagram also shows the timing intervals for the Call Gap operation. The **Δτ** (Call Gap interval) is the time between the start of one Call Gap duration and the start of the next. The **Call Gap Duration** is the time interval during which the SSF is actively controlling the traffic (indicated by the shaded bars on the SSF lifeline). + +Legend: + +- CG: callGap +- CA: call attempt +- OP: initialDP or DP specific +- ST: switch termination +- Δτ: Call Gap interval +- Shaded bar: Call Gap Duration + +T11100150-98 + +Sequence diagram illustrating Call Gap flow control between SCF, SSF, and CCF. The diagram shows the exchange of messages (CG, OP, CA, ST) and the resulting Call Gap intervals (Δτ) on the SSF. A legend defines the symbols: CG (callGap), CA (call attempt), OP (initialDP or DP specific), ST (switch termination), Δτ (Call Gap interval), and a shaded bar (Call Gap Duration). + +Figure 7-50/Q.1229 – Call Gap flow control + +##### 7.2.3.10.2 Service filtering (SCF-SSF) + +The service filtering concept is similar to the Call gapping mechanism with several key differences: + +- The use of Service filtering is intended to be a normal part of call processing for a service in that it allows switch-based handling suitable for mass calling and televoting class of services. +- The filtering interval definition can be done on number of calls between specific start and stop times. Call Gap starts immediately and can only be done on a time duration and interval. +- Statistical information relating to the number of calls filtered is collected and returned to the SCF at the end of each filtering interval. + +The operation of the service filtering traffic control mechanism is shown in Figure 7-51. + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF, SSF, and CCF for service filtering traffic control. The diagram illustrates the flow of messages (SF, OP, SR, CA, ST) and the timing intervals (Δτ) for service filtering. The legend defines the symbols: SF (activateServiceFiltering), SR (serviceFilteringResponse), CA (call attempt), OP (initialDP or DP specific), ST (switch termination), Δτ (Service filtering interval), and Service Filtering Duration.](cb9e3603e260c7b07aca73128586df80_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between three entities: SCF (Service Control Function), SSF (Service Switching Function), and CCF (Call Control Function). The sequence of events is as follows: + +- The SCF sends an **SF** (activateServiceFiltering) message to the SSF. +- The SSF receives the **SF** message and starts a **Service filtering interval** ( $\Delta\tau$ ), indicated by a dark grey bar. +- During this interval, the SSF receives a **CA** (call attempt) from the CCF. +- The SSF sends a **ST** (switch termination) message to the CCF. +- After the interval $\Delta\tau$ , the SSF sends an **OP** (initialDP or DP specific) message to the SCF. +- The SCF responds with an **SR** (serviceFilteringResponse) message to the SSF. +- The SSF then receives another **CA** (call attempt) from the CCF. +- The SSF starts another **Service filtering interval** ( $\Delta\tau$ ), indicated by a light grey bar. +- During this second interval, the SSF receives another **ST** (switch termination) message from the CCF. +- After the second interval $\Delta\tau$ , the SSF sends another **OP** (initialDP or DP specific) message to the SCF. +- The SCF responds with another **SR** (serviceFilteringResponse) message to the SSF. +- Finally, the SSF receives a **CA** (call attempt) from the CCF. + +Legend: + +- SF activateServiceFiltering +- SR serviceFilteringResponse +- CA call attempt +- OP initialDP or DP specific +- ST switch termination +- $\Delta\tau$ Service filtering interval (dark grey bar) +- Service Filtering Duration (light grey bar) + +T11100160-98 + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF, SSF, and CCF for service filtering traffic control. The diagram illustrates the flow of messages (SF, OP, SR, CA, ST) and the timing intervals (Δτ) for service filtering. The legend defines the symbols: SF (activateServiceFiltering), SR (serviceFilteringResponse), CA (call attempt), OP (initialDP or DP specific), ST (switch termination), Δτ (Service filtering interval), and Service Filtering Duration. + +**Figure 7-51/Q.1229 – Service Filtering flow control** + +If service filtering and call gapping are active at the same time for the same criteria, then any call which progress after service filtering will be subject to the call gapping criteria. + +#### 7.2.3.11 DP Generic approach and DP Specific approach + +The IN CS-2 INAP specifies two options for call modelling associated APDUs. These two options are labelled "DP Generic approach" and "DP Specific approach" and are characterized as follows: + +- DP Generic approach: + - one generic APDU (InitialDP), common to all DPs, initiating the service request. A parameter indicates the DP the service request originated from. + - generic APDUs per arming mechanism, i.e. Static (TDP, InitialDP) or Dynamic (EDP, EventReportBCSM). + - the consequence of these two items is as new DPs are defined, new parameters may need to be specified for existing APDUs (InitialDP, EventReportBCSM). + +The receiving entity determines the DP associated with the APDU based on the contents of the received parameter BCSMEventType. + +For the SSF-SCF interface, the following DP generic APDUs are supported: + +- InitialDP (TDP) and EventReportBCSM (EDP). +- DP Specific approach + - one unique APDU per DP initiating the service request. The APDU indicates the DP the service request originated from. + - one APDU independent of the DP arming mechanism, i.e. Static (TDP) or Dynamic (EDP). + - the consequence of these two items is as new DPs are defined, new APDUs need to be specified. + +The receiving entity determines the DP based on received APDU – and DP type (EDP/TDP) based on ServiceAddressInformation as part of dpSpecificCommonParameters. + +For the SSF-SCF interface the following DP specific APDUs are supported: + +- AnalysedInformation, AnalyseInformation, AuthorizeTermination, CollectedInformation, FacilitySelectedAndAvailable, OAbandon, OAnswer, OCalledPartyBusy, ODisconnect, OMidCall, ONoAnswer, OriginationAttempt, OriginationAttemptAuthorized, OSuspended, RouteSelectFailure, SelectFacility, SelectRoute, TAnswer, TBusy, TDisconnect, TMidCall, TNoAnswer, TerminationAttempt, TermAttemptAuthorized, TSuspended. + +For the SCF-SSF interface the following call processing APDUs are used by both the DP Generic and the DP Specific approach.: + +- CollectInformation, Connect, Continue, ContinueWithArgument and RequestReportBCSMEvent. + +The two options "DP Generic approach" and "DP Specific approach" are mutually exclusive, i.e. either one or the other is supported in an application, but not both. + +#### 7.2.3.12 User interaction and CPH processing + +IN CS-2 supports two types of user interaction within a Call Segment: + +- a) UI with SRF resource connected to the Connection Point – allows bidirectional communication path. +- b) UI with SRF resource connected to leg – one-way communication path toward user (tone/announcement). This is supported with PlayAnnouncement operation. + +CS-2 supports no user interaction during CPH processing, but allows buffering of CPH operations during UI to be executed when e.g. announcement is completed and SRF resource disconnected UI in monitoring (call processing) state. + +With IN CS-1, SRF connections can only be made while call processing is suspended at a DP. With IN CS-2, SRF connections can also be made while call processing is not suspended in order to send tone or announcement or display information. + +In CS-2 when UI is addressed to a leg, then only tones and announcement and display information sending is to apply to the addressed party, while maintaining the speech connection between that leg and any other leg connected to the same Call Segment. + +In CS-2 when UI is addressed toward the Connection Point in the CS, then only tones and announcement sending and display information is to apply to all parties (i.e. SRF connected to the Connection Point) in the Call Segment, while maintaining the speech connection between that leg and any other leg connected to the same Call Segment. + +NOTE – If an announcement is sent on one leg (toward one party) the other parties in the call may in "real life" also hear the announcement (but suppressed) due to the reflection caused by the telephone handset. + +For User Interaction during call processing, none of the legs connected to the CP may be in setup, i.e. all BCSM instances shall be in the O/T-Active PIC or O/T\_Suspended PIC, in order to avoid interference between call setup and user interaction. + +During user interaction a "Mid-Call" event (EDP-R) can be detected, allowing the user to interrupt call processing and notify the SCF of this event. The SLP in the SCF may then either decide that: + +- call processing can be resumed with a continue operation, i.e. the ongoing user interaction is unaffected; or +- a CPH or call processing operation other than continue is to be performed. + +In the latter case the restriction applies that any ongoing user interaction shall be ended, i.e. the disconnect of the SRF resource is required in order to allow the CPH or other call processing operations (e.g. ReleaseCall) to be performed. + +An SRF connection can be made while call processing is suspended, i.e. in response to a TDP-R or EDP-R, or when call processing is not suspended. All subsequent call processing operations and CPH operations received from SCF will not be executed until end of user interaction, with the exception of Continue/ContinueWithArgument operation, which is allowed also when call processing is suspended with user interaction ongoing. All operations leading to release of the Call Segment with SRF connection, such as ReleaseCall or MergeCallSegments will not be executed until end of user interaction on that Call segment (CP or leg). + +The release of the Call Segment by any other entity than SCF, i.e. Abandon/Disconnect of last leg or the leg on which an SRF connection is made, will release the SRF on that Call Segment. + +#### 7.2.3.13 Handling of recorded voice messages + +The PromptAndReceiveMessage is used for recording of messages like: + +- personal greetings; +- voice messages; +- tone messages, etc. + +When doing so it is possible by the SLP in the SCF in the PromptAndReceiveMessage to specify within 'InformationToRecord' a "MessageDeletionTimeOut" indicating the maximum time duration a message recording shall be stored in the SRF, i.e. to tell the SRF when to purge the recorded message. Therefore SCF can have control over recording and playback as well as deletion with this operation. + +Moreover, some IPs will have the possibility to handle deletion directly between the user and the IP by means of e.g. DTMF. + +Therefore, the capability exists for the SRF to purge the recorded message either via user interaction directly or via SCF control. + +#### 7.2.3.14 CSAID and its relation to Dialogue ID + +- Dialogue ID + +The establishment of an INAP dialogue involves two application processes as described in Recommendation Q.1228, one that is the dialogue-initiator and one that is the dialogue-responder. On the functional plane a CallID Identifies a specific instance of a relationship between a SCF and SSF. At the physical plane for IN CS-2, it is mapped to a TCAP transaction identity or Dialogue ID. + +- Created Call Segment Association ID + +This information element identifies for the SCF unambiguously the CSA instance in the SSF under control in the involved relationship instance. The SCF may use this information to address CSA instances in the SSF, for example when a call segment should be moved from one CSA instance under one SLPI control to another CSA instance in the same SSF under another SLPI control. The SSF is responsible for specifying a new CSA identifier for the created CSA which is unique within the SSF. + +From the above it is clear that the Dialogue ID merely identifies a specific instance of a relationship between two FEs like e.g. between SCF and SSF, whereas the Created Call Segment Association ID (CSAID) identifies the CSA instance in the SSF under control by the SCF (SLPI) in the involved relationship instance identified (i.e. within the specific relationship instance identified by Dialogue ID). + +There is one to one relationship between dialogueID and CSAID, i.e. for one dialogueID one CSAID. + +## IN CS-2 service scenario examples + +## A.1 Example of the "User Interaction Script" concept: "Credit Card Calling" services + +### A.1.1 Assumptions + +This subclause describes a "Credit Card Calling" service on an IN architecture based on the "User Interaction Script" concept, e.g. a share of service logic between the SCF and the SRF. The SCF runs the global service logic while the SRF runs the service logic dedicated to user interaction. + +During the User Interaction, the SCF sends information (orders, additional information) to the SRF using the SCF-SRF operations: scriptRun, scriptInformation and scriptClose and the SRF sends back information (partial or final results, requirement for additional information) using the scriptEvent operation. These operations are correlated with each other using the script identifier called idS in this example. + +The "User Interaction" script on the SRF is composed of several enhanced functions. One enhanced function running on the SRF is stopped each time a new one is launched by the SCF. For example, when the SCF asks databases for user authentication, the SRF plays a waiting music until the SCF requests it either to prompt the calling party of a wrong PIN number or to get a called party number. In the same way, on receipt of a release indication from the called party during the call setup (busy, no-answer, etc.), the SCF requests the SRF to prompt the calling party about his choice: release, follow-on, etc. + +The SCF service logic could reach several states which are: + +- **Authentication:** The SCF asks databases to authenticate the Credit Card Number and the PIN. Depending on the result, the following events may be encountered: Card OK, Card NOK (in this case the SCF manages the number of tries), "In service" card (people are using the card). +- **Call:** After having received the "Called Party Number", the SCF completes the call to the called party. During the "alerting" phase, the following event may be encountered: "Answer" receipt, NoAnswer (after temporization), Busy conditions. On receipt of such events, the SCF requests the SRF to prompt the calling party about his choice: release, follow-on, etc. +- **Comm:** During the active phase the user has reached his correspondent. The end of this state is: Hang Up of the called party, etc. + +### A.1.2 Enhanced functions on the SRF + +The dedicated enhanced functions that compose the "Credit Card Calling" script on the SRF are: + +**AskCard:** The purpose is to get the user card number. The SRF controls the waiting duration and the number of repetition of each prompt. The SRF has to collect the card number managing user attempt, controlling the data format, the cancellation, etc. + +The possible exits are: + +- 1) OK with card number; or +- 2) NOK with the cause (errors, cancellation, etc.). + +In the first case SRF will stay on line and will entertain the user with music. In the second case the SRF will hang up after an information prompt like "Sorry, too many mistakes (response is NOK, cause = error num)". + +**AskTel:** The SRF asks for the phone number. + +**Menu:** The SRF prompts the user to know what to do. For example, in case of no answer, after a specific waiting time, the SRF prompts the calling party and asks the calling party if he wants to keep waiting or to stop alerting the called party. In the latter case, the SRF will ask the calling party if he wants to make a follow-on call, and then will get the new called party number. + +**WarningEnd:** will prompt user of the near end of the call. + +### A.1.3 Message Sequence Chart + +Figure A.1 illustrates the use of the "User Interaction Script" concept with one "Credit Card Calling" service. The enhanced functions defined in the previous subclause are invoked sequentially: + +- a) The SCF invokes the **askCard** function to authenticate the calling party and gets the User card number. The possible results are: + - 1) The calling party has correctly dialled his card number. + - 2) The calling party has not correctly dialled his card number. +- b) If the calling party has correctly dialled his card number, then the SCF closes the **askCard** function (**1'**) and invokes the **askTel** function (**1''**) to get the Called Party Number. The possible results are: + - 3) The calling party has not correctly dialled the Called Party Number. + - 4) The calling party has correctly dialled the Called Party Number. +- b') If the calling party has not correctly dialled his card number, then the SCF invokes the **askCard** function a second time (**2'**). +- c) If the calling party has correctly dialled the Called Party Number, then the SCF closes the **askTel** function (**3'**) and completes the call to the called party. If the called party does not answer (expiry of the SCF "No-Answer" timer), the SCF invokes the **Menu** function (**5**) to propose to the calling party a Menu. +- c') If the calling party has not correctly dialled the Called Party Number, then the SCF closes the **askTel** function (**3'**) and User Interaction script. +- d) The possible results are: + - 6) The calling party wants to make a follow-on call but has not correctly dialled the Called Party Number. + - 7) The calling party wants to make a follow-on call and has correctly dialled the Called Party Number. + - 8) The calling party wants to continue alerting the called party. +- e) If the calling party wants to make a follow-on call but has not correctly dialled the Called Party Number, then the SCF closes the **Menu** function and User Interaction script (**6'**). +- e') If the calling party wants to make a follow-on call and has correctly dialled the Called Party Number, then the SCF closes the **Menu** function (**3'**) and completes the call to the called party. On receipt of a release indication from the called party, the SCF invokes the **WarningEnd** function to release the call and the User Interaction is complete (**9**). +- e'') If the calling party wants to continue alerting the called party, on receipt of the "no-answer" indication from the SSF, the SCF invokes the **Menu** function a second time (**10**). + +![Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SRF for 'Card Calling'. The diagram includes states like Begin, Authenticate, Call, Com, AskCard, AskTel, End, Menu, and WarningEnd, with various scriptRun, scriptEvent, scriptInformation, and scriptClose messages.](3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCF + participant SRF + + Note left of SCF: Begin + SCF->>SRF: scriptRun (idScript) + Note right of SRF: AskCard + SRF-->>SCF: 1) scriptEvent (idS, nOK, cause) + SRF-->>SCF: 2) scriptEvent (idS, OK, cardNr & PIN)) + Note left of SCF: Authenticate + SCF->>SRF: 2') scriptInformation (idS, AskCard) + Note right of SRF: AskCard + SCF->>SRF: 1') scriptClose (idS) + Note right of SRF: End + SCF->>SRF: 1'') scriptInformation (idS, AskTel) + Note right of SRF: AskTel + SRF-->>SCF: 3) scriptEvent (idS, nOK, cause) + SRF-->>SCF: 4) scriptEvent (idS, Called Number)) + Note left of SCF: Call + SCF->>SRF: 3'') scriptClose (idS) + Note right of SRF: End + SCF->>SRF: 5) scriptInformation (idS, Menu, Event) + Note right of SRF: Menu + SRF-->>SCF: 6) scriptEvent (idS, nOK, cause) + SRF-->>SCF: 7) scriptEvent (idS, OK, Called Number) + SRF-->>SCF: 8) scriptEvent (idS, OK, continue) + Note left of SCF: Com + SCF->>SRF: 6'') scriptClose + Note right of SRF: End + SCF->>SRF: 9) scriptInformation (idS, WarningEnd) + Note right of SRF: WarningEnd + SCF->>SRF: 10) scriptInformation (idS, Menu, twice) + Note right of SRF: Menu + +``` + +T11100180-98 + +Sequence diagram showing information flows between SCF and SRF for 'Card Calling'. The diagram includes states like Begin, Authenticate, Call, Com, AskCard, AskTel, End, Menu, and WarningEnd, with various scriptRun, scriptEvent, scriptInformation, and scriptClose messages. + +**Figure A.1/Q.1229 – Example information flows for "Card Calling"** + +## A.2 Service scenario examples for Out-channel Call Unrelated User Interaction + +### A.2.1 Call Forwarding activation request + +The Message Sequence Chart (MSC) in Figure A.2 illustrates a simple case: the user activating Call Forwarding (CF) via the SCUAF. CF activation is identified at the CUSF by the operation code of FACILITY IE in the REGISTER message. Then the TDP criteria is checked, the CUSF issues ActivationReceivedAndAuthorized (ARAA) as a TDP-R message. + +The componentType, component, componentCorrelationID in ARAA are key information to correlate the response from the SCF (in this case SendComponent). As the invocation on the UNI (SCUAF-CUSF relationship) has only local significance, the component on the UNI is mapped to componentType and component parameters and the invokeID on the UNI is also indirectly mapped to componentCorrelationID. The componentCorrelationID will be managed in the CUSF to correlate a resource from the SCF for the Classes 2, 3, and 4 ROSE operations on the UNI that resulted in this triggering. The ID is assigned at the FE which detects (CUSF case) or decides (via SendComponent from SCF case: this is mentioned in A.1.2) the new invocation of operation on the UNI. + +![Sequence diagram for Call Forwarding activation showing interactions between SCUAF, CUSF, and SCF.](024914144d624b7f5dc22aaa5c3967b9_img.jpg) + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant SCUAF + participant CUSF + participant SCF + Note left of SCUAF: REGISTER [FACILITY invoke: CF activation, CRj] + SCUAF->>CUSF: REGISTER [FACILITY invoke: CF activation, CRj] + Note right of CUSF: ActivationReceivedAndAuthorized [componentType = invoke, component = CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, nonCallDPSpecificCommonParameters] + CUSF->>SCF: ActivationReceivedAndAuthorized [componentType = invoke, component = CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, nonCallDPSpecificCommonParameters] + Note right of SCF: SendComponent and Release [componentType = returnresult, component = return result of CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, message = RelComp.] + SCF->>CUSF: SendComponent and Release [componentType = returnresult, component = return result of CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, message = RelComp.] + Note left of SCUAF: RelComp with cause value #x [FACILITY return result: CF activation, CRj] + CUSF->>SCUAF: RelComp with cause value #x [FACILITY return result: CF activation, CRj] + Note right of SCF: Release has Cause parameter value #x +``` + +The diagram illustrates the message sequence for Call Forwarding activation. It involves three lifelines: SCUAF, CUSF, and SCF. The sequence starts with a REGISTER message from SCUAF to CUSF, containing [FACILITY invoke: CF activation, CRj]. CUSF then sends an ActivationReceivedAndAuthorized message to SCF, with parameters: componentType = invoke, component = CF\_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, and nonCallDPSpecificCommonParameters. SCF responds with a SendComponent and Release message to CUSF, with parameters: componentType = returnresult, component = return result of CF\_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 1, and message = RelComp. CUSF then sends a RelComp message to SCUAF, containing [FACILITY return result: CF activation, CRj]. Finally, SCF sends a Release message to CUSF, containing the cause parameter value #x. + +Sequence diagram for Call Forwarding activation showing interactions between SCUAF, CUSF, and SCF. + +NOTE – This example assumes CR management will be realized in the CCF, and feature interaction management will be realized in the CUSF. + +Figure A.2/Q.1229 – Example Message Sequence Chart for Call Forwarding activation + +### A.2.2 Call Forwarding activation request with authentication + +This MSC illustrates that the SCF side (an SLP) decided to have another invocation on the UNI. The correlation of the component for authentication will be also done by componentCorrelationID, but the value (0xff) is assigned by the SCF. The ID is also used to correlate the event report request of return result or return error (via RequestReportBCSMEVENT) and the event report (ComponentReceived) in this case. + +In the example in Figure A.3, the value space for the componentCorrelationID is divided in positive and negative to ease the management of the ID in the SCF and the CUSF respectively. + +![Sequence diagram showing interactions between SCUA, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram illustrates a call forwarding activation process with authentication. SCUA sends a REGISTER message to CUSF. CUSF sends an ActivationReceivedAnd Authorized response to SCF. CUSF then sends a RequestReportBCUSMEVENT to SCF. SCF sends a Facility message to SCUA. SCUA sends a Facility return result to CUSF. CUSF sends a ComponentReceived message to SCF. SCF sends a SendComponent message to CUSF. CUSF sends a Facility return result to SCUA. SCUA sends a RelComp message to CUSF. CUSF sends an AssociationReleaseRequested message to SCF.](2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SCUA + participant CUSF + participant SCF + + Note left of SCUA: REGISTER [FACILITY invoke: CF activation, CRj] + SCUA->>CUSF: REGISTER [FACILITY invoke: CF activation, CRj] + Note right of CUSF: ActivationReceivedAnd Authorized [componentType = invoke, component = CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 0x01, nonCallDPSpecificCommonParameters] + CUSF->>SCF: ActivationReceivedAnd Authorized [componentType = invoke, component = CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 0x01, nonCallDPSpecificCommonParameters] + Note right of SCF: RequestReportBCUSMEVENT [componentType = returnResult, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, componentType = returnError, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, ] + Note right of SCF: SendComponent [componentType = invoke, component = Authentication, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, message = Facility, ] + SCF->>CUSF: RequestReportBCUSMEVENT [componentType = returnResult, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, componentType = returnError, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, ] + SCF->>CUSF: SendComponent [componentType = invoke, component = Authentication, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, message = Facility, ] + Note left of SCUA: Facility [FACILITY invoke: Authentication, CRj] + CUSF->>SCUA: Facility [FACILITY invoke: Authentication, CRj] + Note left of SCUA: Facility [FACILITY return result: Authentication, CRj] + SCUA->>CUSF: Facility [FACILITY return result: Authentication, CRj] + Note right of CUSF: ComponentReceived [componentType = returnResult, component = return result of Authentication, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, ] + CUSF->>SCF: ComponentReceived [componentType = returnResult, component = return result of Authentication, componentCorrelationID = 0xff, ] + Note right of SCF: SendComponent [componentType = returnResult, component = return result of CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 0x01, message = Facility, ] + SCF->>CUSF: SendComponent [componentType = returnResult, component = return result of CF_Activation, componentCorrelationID = 0x01, message = Facility, ] + Note left of SCUA: Facility [FACILITY return result: CF_Activation, CRj] + CUSF->>SCUA: Facility [FACILITY return result: CF_Activation, CRj] + Note left of SCUA: RelComp with cause value #x [FACILITY invoke: CF ActivationAck, CRj] + SCUA->>CUSF: RelComp with cause value #x [FACILITY invoke: CF ActivationAck, CRj] + Note right of CUSF: AssociationReleaseRequested [componentType = invoke, component = CF ActivationAck, componentCorrelationID = 0x02, ] + CUSF->>SCF: AssociationReleaseRequested [componentType = invoke, component = CF ActivationAck, componentCorrelationID = 0x02, ] + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing interactions between SCUA, CUSF, and SCF. The diagram illustrates a call forwarding activation process with authentication. SCUA sends a REGISTER message to CUSF. CUSF sends an ActivationReceivedAnd Authorized response to SCF. CUSF then sends a RequestReportBCUSMEVENT to SCF. SCF sends a Facility message to SCUA. SCUA sends a Facility return result to CUSF. CUSF sends a ComponentReceived message to SCF. SCF sends a SendComponent message to CUSF. CUSF sends a Facility return result to SCUA. SCUA sends a RelComp message to CUSF. CUSF sends an AssociationReleaseRequested message to SCF. + +T11100200-98 + +**Figure A.3/Q.1229 – Example Message Sequence Chart for Call Forwarding activation (with authentication)** + +## A.3 Service scenario examples for CPH CVS approach + +### A.3.1 Follow-on Call on request by calling party + +This feature (see Figure A.4) allows a service user, e.g. a UPT user, when terminating an outgoing UPT call, before disconnecting completely, to initiate a new UPT outgoing call without having to repeat the identification and authentication procedures. + +In the example in Figure A.5, during the alerting phase or the active call phase, the calling A-party requests the service logic to disconnect the connection from the SSP to the called B-party (outgoing call leg). The follow-on request from the user is considered as a "Mid-Call" event. After performing the disconnection, the service logic prompts the user via User Interaction procedures for the new address information to set up a new outgoing call. + +![Figure A.4/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in 'Follow-on Call'. The diagram shows four Connection View State (CVS) boxes: CVS1 'Originating Setup', CVS2 'Stable 2-Party', CVS3 '1-Party', and CVS4 '1-Party' SRF Resource connected to Connection Point. Each box contains a circle with 'c' and '1', and a rectangle with 'O-BCSM'. Arrows labeled 'Joined', 'Pending', and 'R' connect the boxes. A label 'T11100210-98' is at the bottom right.](d3253d5db64378db6e72b66b41067a5b_img.jpg) + +Figure A.4/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in 'Follow-on Call'. The diagram shows four Connection View State (CVS) boxes: CVS1 'Originating Setup', CVS2 'Stable 2-Party', CVS3 '1-Party', and CVS4 '1-Party' SRF Resource connected to Connection Point. Each box contains a circle with 'c' and '1', and a rectangle with 'O-BCSM'. Arrows labeled 'Joined', 'Pending', and 'R' connect the boxes. A label 'T11100210-98' is at the bottom right. + +Figure A.4/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in "Follow-on Call" + +![](78151e5dd542eada99ead8203dfce76b_img.jpg) + +| Connection View State | SSF | SCF | +|-----------------------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| CVS1 | -----> | InitialDP or AnalysedInformation
IN service triggering at Analysed_InformationDP | +| CVS2 | <-----
<----- | RequestReportBCSMEvent,
Connect
(monitor for Midcall event: A-flash) | +| CVS3 | ----->
<----- | EventReportBCSM (A-flash)
DisconnectLeg (leg2), | +| CVS4 | <-----
<----- | ConnectToResources (CS1),
PromptAndCollectUserInfo
(prompt for new destination number) | +| CVS3 | -----> | PromptAndCollectUserInfo Result | +| CVS2 | <-----
<----- | DisconnectForwardConnection (CS1),
Connect | + +T11100220-98 + +Figure A.5/Q.1229 – Example information flows for "Follow-on Call" + +### A.3.2 Reverse Charging + +This service feature (see Figure A.6) allows the service subscriber (e.g. called party) to accept to receive calls at its expense and be charged for the entire cost of the call. + +![Figure A.6/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in 'Reverse Charging'. The diagram shows four Call View State (CVS) boxes: CVS1 'Originating Setup', CVS2 'Stable 2-Party', CVS3 'Call on Hold', and CVS4 'Call on Hold' (SRF Resource connected to Connection Point). Arrows labeled 'Joined', 'Pending', and 'Shared' connect these states. Each box contains internal components like 'c', 'p1', 'O-BCSM', and numbered circles (1, 2).](200e768e8ed91aadff59c651287d1009_img.jpg) + +Figure A.6/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in 'Reverse Charging'. The diagram shows four Call View State (CVS) boxes: CVS1 'Originating Setup', CVS2 'Stable 2-Party', CVS3 'Call on Hold', and CVS4 'Call on Hold' (SRF Resource connected to Connection Point). Arrows labeled 'Joined', 'Pending', and 'Shared' connect these states. Each box contains internal components like 'c', 'p1', 'O-BCSM', and numbered circles (1, 2). + +Figure A.6/Q.1229 – Graphical representation of CVSs used in "Reverse Charging" + +![](ceb6fe29e2d57711907569c31182b3c2_img.jpg) + +| Connection View State | SSF | SCF | +|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| CVS1 | -----> | InitialIDP or AnalysedInformation | +| | <----- | RequestReportBCSMEvent, Connect (monitor for Answer) | +| CVS2 | -----> | EventReportBCSM (Answer, intercepted) | +| | <----- | SplitLeg (leg2, create CS2)
B-party on call hold | +| CVS3 | <----- | ConnectToResources (CS1),
PlayAnnouncement (CS1) | +| CVS4 | <----- | ConnectToResource (CS2) | +| | <----- | PromptAndCollectUserInformation (CS2)
(prompt for call pay acceptance) | +| CVS3 | -----> | PromptAndCollectUserInformation Result
(SRF disconnect from IP) | +| CVS2 | <----- | DisconnectForwardConnection (CS1), | +| | <----- | MergeCallSegments (source CS2) | +| | <----- | Continue | + +T11100240-98 + +Figure A.7/Q.1229 – Example information flows for "Reverse Charging" + +## **A.4 Service scenario examples for CPH hybrid approach** + +### **A.4.1 Call Waiting** + +The following diagrams are used to illustrate how the Call Waiting feature can be implemented using the Call Party Handling (CPH) Hybrid Approach. The notation (*Core Cap. x*) indicates that a description corresponds to Core Capability *x*, where *x* = 1, 2, 3 or 4. The four Core Capabilities as identified in Recommendation Q.1224 are: + +- 1) Core capability 1 allows for a user to enter information during a midcall event; +- 2) Core capability 2 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to connect a call party to an external resource to perform a transfer; +- 3) Core capability 3 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to present the current view of the call to the SCF; +- 4) Core capability 4 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to combine separate calls into a single call. + +##### **Call Waiting – Part 1** **(Route Party C to Resource and Alert Party A of Second Incoming Call)** + +![Diagram of CSAid 1 showing a box labeled 'C party' with ports 'c' and 'p1' connected through a circle labeled '1'. Diagram showing CSAid 1 with ports c, p1, p2. Port p1 is connected to a box representing SRF. Below is a Stable 2-party diagram with ports 0c and 1 for B party.](9ee1d5bfebea866ee79cccb39ad313de_img.jpg) + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

SSF/CCF                      SCF

Term.Setup:

CSAid 1

T1: ____________________>

T_Busy (CSAid 1, Term Setup CVS, ...)

|

(NOTE – The T_Busy trigger for Party A is armed as a TDP-R.)

– Initially, no IN relationships exist.

– Active two-party call exists between Parties A and B.

– Party A is subscribed to Call Waiting.

– SSF/CCF detects busy for incoming call from Party C to Party A.

– T_Busy trigger is encountered.

– Terminating Setup CVS is generated and TCAP transaction T1 is initiated (Core Capability 3).

– SSF/CCF assigns CSAid1 to this Call Segment Association.

| +|

SSF/CCF                      SCF                      SRF

____________________>

Provide_Avail_DN
(party_C, action)

<____________________

Avail_DN_Provided
(party_C, DN_1)

<____________________ T1:

RequestReportBCSMEvent (T_Disconn, O_Disconn)
Connect (party_C, DN_1)
ConnectToResource (party_A)
PlayAnnouncement (leg0, InbandAlertingTone)

________________________________________>

Connect (party_C, DN_1)

<____________________

Port_Connected (DN_1)

|

– SCF invokes service logic.

– SCF queries resource for an available DN, passes ID of Party C and action to be taken by SRF (e.g. put C on hold).

– Resource responds with available DN.

– SCF directs SSF/CCF to transfer Party C to routing DN and arms the T_Disconnect EDP-N. Also, SCF directs SSF/CCF to apply inband alerting tone to party A. The SCF arms the O_Disconnect EDP to monitor for possible disconnection from the SRF for the transferred leg.

– Party C is routed to resource where action specified earlier by SCF (see above) is performed. (Core Cap. 2)

| +|

SSF/CCF                                              SRF

Transfer    C party

T1:

CSAid 1

Stable 2-party:

A Party gets inband tone

(NOTE – Stable 2-party CVS is internal to the SSF/CCF and not visible to the SCF.)

|

– Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 and CSAid1 are now associated with the CSA containing the CS where Party C is transferred to the SRF.

– SSF/CCF provides inband alerting tone to Party A over the talk path between Party A and Party B.

| + +Diagram of CSAid 1 showing a box labeled 'C party' with ports 'c' and 'p1' connected through a circle labeled '1'. Diagram showing CSAid 1 with ports c, p1, p2. Port p1 is connected to a box representing SRF. Below is a Stable 2-party diagram with ports 0c and 1 for B party. + +T11100250-98 + +##### **Call Waiting – Part 2** **(Party A flashes to put Party B on hold, and to connect to Party C)** + +![Sequence diagram for Call Waiting Part 2 showing interactions between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the process of putting Party B on hold and connecting Party A to Party C via a new CSA (CSAid3).](c80e1284549c9914d0249b0e749c500a_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of events: + +- Initial State:** + - T1:** SSF/CCF has a 'Transfer C Party' CSA (CSAid1) with ports p1 and p2. Port p1 is connected to the SRF. + - T2:** SSF/CCF has a 'Stable 2-party' CSA (CSAid2) for 'A Party' with ports c and p1. Port p1 is connected to the SRF. +- Trigger:** Party A flashes, generating a 'Switch\_Hook\_Flash\_Immediate' trigger. +- TCAP Transaction T2:** + - SSF/CCF sends an **O\_MidCall** or **T\_MidCall** message (containing party\_A, CSAid2, and Stable 2-party CVS) to the SCF. + - SCF invokes service logic and queries the SRF for two available DN numbers using **Provide\_Avail\_DN** messages (one for party\_B, one for party\_A). + - SRF responds with **Avail\_DN\_Provided** messages (DN\_2 for party\_B, DN\_3 for party\_A). +- Disconnection and New CSA Creation:** + - SCF sends a **Disconnect Forward Connection** message to the SSF/CCF (T1). + - SSF/CCF sends a **Create CSA** message to the SCF (T3). + - SCF returns the result with **Return Result (CSAid3)**. +- Call Segment Movement:** + - SCF sends a **RequestReportBCSMEVENT** (O\_Disconnect, O\_Midcall) with **SplitLeg** (controlling leg), **MoveCallSegment** (sourceCSA = CSAid2, targetCSA = CSAid3, sourceCSid = 1, newCSid = 1), and **Connect (DN\_3)** to the SSF/CCF. + - SSF/CCF sends a **Connect (party\_A, DN\_3)** message to the SRF. + - SRF responds with **Port\_Connected (DN\_3)**. +- Final Connection:** + - SCF sends another **RequestReportBCSMEVENT** (O\_Disconn, T\_Disconn) and **Connect (DN\_2)** to the SSF/CCF (T3). + - SSF/CCF sends a **Connect (party\_B, DN\_2)** message to the SRF. + - SRF responds with **Port\_Connected (DN-2)**. +- Final State:** + - T1:** SSF/CCF has 'Transfer C Party' (CSAid1) connected to the SRF. + - T3:** SSF/CCF has 'Transfer B Party' (CSAid3) connected to the SRF. + - T2:** SSF/CCF has 'Stable 2-party' (CSAid2) for 'A Party' connected to the SRF. + +Sequence diagram for Call Waiting Part 2 showing interactions between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the process of putting Party B on hold and connecting Party A to Party C via a new CSA (CSAid3). + +(NOTE – The Switch\_Hook\_Flash\_Immediate trigger for party A is armed as a TD.) + +– Parties A and B are talking. Party C is on hold at SRF. + +– Party A flashes. (*Core Cap.1*) + +– The Switch\_Hook\_Flash\_Immediate trigger is encountered. (*Core Cap. 1*) + +– Stable 2-party CVS is generated and TCAP transaction T2 is initiated. SSF/CCF assigns CSAid2 to this CSA and sends it along with the O\_MidCall or T\_MidCall IF to the SCF. + +– SCF invokes service logic. + +– SCF queries SRF for two available DN numbers, passes ID of Parties A and B and actions to be taken by SRF. + +– SRF responds with available DN numbers, DN\_2 and DN\_3, respectively. + +– SCF sends a Disconnect Forward Connection IF to the SSF/CCF to end the inband alerting tone to party A. + +– SCF initiates a new TCAP transaction, T3, to create a new CSA. The SSF/CCF assigns CSAid3 to the new CSA and returns the ID to the SCF. + +– SCF arms O\_Disconnect EDP for the CSA under T2. The Split Leg will cause the SSF/CCF to transition from the Stable 2-party CVS to a 3-party Setup CVS. The MoveCallSegment will cause the SSF/CCF to move the call segment with the B party on hold to the newly created CSA. Finally, the Connect IF will connect Party A, who remains in this CSA, to the SRF using DN\_3. + +– SCF arms the O\_Disconnect or the T\_Disconnect EDP for the CSA under T3. SCF also sends the ConnectIF to route Party B to the SRF using DN\_2. + +– SRF, instructed previously by SCF (see action above), puts Party B on hold. + +– SRF, instructed previously by SCF (see action above), connects Party A to Party C. + +T11100260-98 + +##### **Call Waiting – Part 3** **(Party A flashes to put Party C on hold, and to connect to Party B)** + +![Sequence diagram for Call Waiting Part 3 showing interactions between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the process of putting Party C on hold and connecting Party A to Party B via the O_MidCall transaction.](08f5fade508b5badd6175fa5e482132f_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF for Call Waiting Part 3. It is divided into three horizontal sections by dashed lines. + +**Top Section:** + +- SSF/CCF:** Contains three entities: + - T1:** Labeled "Transfer C Party", "CSAid1". It shows a circle with 'c' and '1' inside, connected to 'p1' and 'p2'. + - T3:** Labeled "Transfer B Party", "CSAid3". It shows a circle with 'c' and '1' inside, connected to 'p1' and 'p2'. + - T2:** Labeled "Stable 2-party", "A Party", "CSAid 2". It shows a circle with 'c' and '1' inside, connected to 'p1'. +- SCF:** The central processing element. +- SRF:** The resource element, shown as a large vertical rounded rectangle. + +**Initial State:** Party A (T2) and Party C (T1) are connected. Party B (T3) is on hold. + +**Event:** Party A flashes. This is represented by a message **T2: O\_MidCall (party\_A, Stable 2-party CVS)** sent from SSF/CCF to SCF. + +**SCF Action:** The SCF receives the message and invokes service logic. It sends two messages to the SRF: + + +- Unbridge\_Ports (DN\_1, DN\_3)** +- Bridge\_Ports (DN\_2, DN\_3)** + +**SRF Response:** The SRF responds with: + + +- Ports\_Unbridged (DN\_1, DN\_3)** +- Ports\_Bridged (DN\_2, DN\_3)** + +**SCF to SSF/CCF:** The SCF returns a **Continue** message in response to the **O\_MidCall** IF. The TCAP transaction T2 remains open. + +**Bottom Section:** + +- SSF/CCF:** The entities are now: + - T1:** Labeled "Transfer C Party", "CSAid1". + - T3:** Labeled "Transfer B Party", "CAid3". + - T2:** Labeled "Stable 2-party", "A Party", "CSAid2". +- SCF and SRF:** Remain the same. + +**Final State:** Party A (T2) is now connected to Party B (T3). Party C (T1) is on hold. A note indicates that Party A may flash again to toggle between Parties B and C. + +Sequence diagram for Call Waiting Part 3 showing interactions between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the process of putting Party C on hold and connecting Party A to Party B via the O\_MidCall transaction. + +T11100270-98 + +##### **Call Waiting – Part 4** **(Party C disconnects while talking to Party A, Party A is reconnected to Party B)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the call waiting process. It is divided into three sections by horizontal dashed lines. The first section shows Party C disconnecting while Party A is talking to Party B. The second section shows the SCF reconnecting Party A and Party B. The third section shows the final stable 2-party call between A and B.](3e5f2ac33251e61ca84628b194d44ceb_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF during a call waiting scenario. It is divided into three main sections by horizontal dashed lines. + +**Top Section: Initial State and Party C Disconnect** + +- SSF/CCF:** Contains three call segments: + - T1: C Party (NULL CSAid1) + - T3: Transfer B Party (CSAid3, ports p1, p2) + - T2: Stable 2-party (A Party, CSAid2, ports c, p1) +- SCF:** The central control element. +- SRF:** The switching resource. + +Initial state: Parties A and C are talking. Party B is on hold. Party C goes on hook. + +Sequence of messages: + +- SSF/CCF sends **T1: T\_Disconnect (leg = p1)** to SCF. +- SCF sends **Disconnect (Party C, DN\_1)** to SRF. +- SRF responds with **Port\_Disconnected (DN\_1)** to SCF. + +Result: SSF/CCF clears the call between Party C and the SRF and closes the transaction T1. + +--- + +**Middle Section: Reconnection of Parties A and B** + +- SSF/CCF:** Receives instructions from SCF. + - For T3: **Disconnect Leg (Leg id = 2)** + - For T2: **Disconnect Leg (Leg id = 1)**, **MoveCallSegment (sourceCSA = CSAid3, targetCSA = CSAid2, sourceCSid = 1, newCSid = 2)**, and **MergeCallSegments**. +- SCF:** Instructs SSF/CCF via T3 and T2 transactions. + - Using T3, SCF instructs SSF/CCF to disconnect party B from the SRF. + - Using T2, SCF instructs SSF/CCF to disconnect party A from the SRF, move the call segment from CSAid3 to CSAid2, and merge the segments. +- SRF:** Receives disconnect commands from SCF. + - Disconnect (Party A, DN\_3)** and **Port\_Disconnected (DN\_3)** for party B. + - Disconnect (Party A, DN\_2)** and **Port\_Disconnected (DN\_2)** for party A. + +Result: The SCF reconnects the parties back in the SSF/CCF, resulting in a stable 2-party call between A and B. + +--- + +**Bottom Section: Final State** + +- SSF/CCF:** Contains a **Stable 2-Party** call segment between **A Party** and **B Party** (CSAid2). +- SCF:** Both TCAP transactions, T2 and T3, are closed. The transaction between the SCF and SRF is also closed. + +Sequence diagram showing the call waiting process. It is divided into three sections by horizontal dashed lines. The first section shows Party C disconnecting while Party A is talking to Party B. The second section shows the SCF reconnecting Party A and Party B. The third section shows the final stable 2-party call between A and B. + +T11100280-98 + +### **A.4.2 Conference Call** + +The following diagrams are used to illustrate how the Conference Calling feature can be implemented using the Call Party Handling (CPH) Hybrid Approach. The notation (*Core Cap. x*) indicates that a description corresponds to Core Capability *x*, where *x* = 1, 2, 3 or 4. The four Core Capabilities as identified in Recommendation Q.1224 are: + +- 1) Core capability 1 allows for a user to enter information during a midcall event; +- 2) Core capability 2 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to connect a call party to an external resource to perform a transfer; +- 3) Core capability 3 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to present the current view of the call to the SCF; +- 4) Core capability 4 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to combine separate calls into a single call. + +#### Conference Call – Part 1 (Route Party B to Resource) + +![Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains an 'M-Party Setup' box. Inside, 'A Party Joined' is associated with port 'c' and 'p2', labeled 'Pending'. 'Shared' is associated with port '1' and 'p1', labeled 'Joined B Party'. Below this, transaction T1 is shown sending an 'O_MidCall' message with parameters: (triggertype, *003, CSAid1, M-Party Setup, ...).](a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains an 'M-Party Setup' box. Inside, 'A Party Joined' is associated with port 'c' and 'p2', labeled 'Pending'. 'Shared' is associated with port '1' and 'p1', labeled 'Joined B Party'. Below this, transaction T1 is shown sending an 'O\_MidCall' message with parameters: (triggertype, \*003, CSAid1, M-Party Setup, ...). + +- Initially, no IN relationships exist. +- Active two-party call exists between Parties A and B. +- Call Party A flashes. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- B party placed on SSF/CCF based hold. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- SSF/CCF provides dial tone to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Digit collector is connected to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Party A: Enters feature code (e.g. \*003). (*Core Cap. 1*) +- O\_MidCall trigger fires. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- M Party Setup CVS is generated and TCAP transaction T1 is initiated. (*Core Cap. 3*) +- Input of DN instead of feature code by Party A would have resulted in a call being originated, without firing the trigger. + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SCF sends 'Provide_Avail_DN (party_b, action)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Avail_DN_Provided (party_b, DN_1)'. SCF then initiates transaction T2 with 'CreateCallSegmentAssociation'. SSF/CCF returns 'Return Result (CSAid2)'. SCF sends 'RequestReportBCSMEVENT (T_Disconnect, O_Disconnect)' and 'MoveCallSegments' (Source CSA = CSAid1, Target CSA = CSAid2, Source CSid = 2, new CSid = 1) to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends 'Connect (party_b, DN_1)' to SCF. SCF sends 'Collect_Info (party_a)' to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends another 'Connect (party_b, DN_1)' to SCF. Finally, SCF receives 'Port_Connected (DN-1)' from SRF.](6059b0a3a051cc20b414d51a4e412f3e_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SCF sends 'Provide\_Avail\_DN (party\_b, action)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Avail\_DN\_Provided (party\_b, DN\_1)'. SCF then initiates transaction T2 with 'CreateCallSegmentAssociation'. SSF/CCF returns 'Return Result (CSAid2)'. SCF sends 'RequestReportBCSMEVENT (T\_Disconnect, O\_Disconnect)' and 'MoveCallSegments' (Source CSA = CSAid1, Target CSA = CSAid2, Source CSid = 2, new CSid = 1) to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends 'Connect (party\_b, DN\_1)' to SCF. SCF sends 'Collect\_Info (party\_a)' to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends another 'Connect (party\_b, DN\_1)' to SCF. Finally, SCF receives 'Port\_Connected (DN-1)' from SRF. + +- SCF invokes service logic based on feature code (e.g. \*003). +- SCF queries resource for an available DN, passes ID of Party B and action to be taken by SRF. +- Resource responds with available DN. +- The SCF initiates a new TCAP transaction, T2, to create a new CSA. The SSF/CCF assigns CSAid2 to the new CSA and returns the ID to the SCF in the Return Result. +- Under TCAP transaction T1, the Move Call Segments moves Party A to the new CSA, disassociating Parties A and B. Request ReportBCSMEVENT sets the O/T Disconnect EDPs to monitor B-party disconnect or disconnection of the transferred leg from the SRF (e.g. resulting from a problem). Connect transfers Party B in CSAid1 to the SRF using DN\_1 and transits to the Transfer CVS. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Collect\_Info is sent on transaction T2 (Party A). +- Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 is now associated with Party B's path through the SSF/CCF (CSAid1) and T2 is associated with Party A (CSAid2). + +![Diagram showing the final state of the call segments. SSF/CCF contains two boxes. The top box, labeled 'Transfer', shows 'Joined B Party' with ports 'p1' and 'p2' connected to a resource box. It is associated with transaction T1 and CSAid1. The bottom box, labeled 'Orig. Setup', shows 'A Party Joined' with port 'c' and 'p1' labeled 'Pending'. It is associated with transaction T2 and CSAid2.](93bc9e79386c488b5f130ab90aacf464_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing the final state of the call segments. SSF/CCF contains two boxes. The top box, labeled 'Transfer', shows 'Joined B Party' with ports 'p1' and 'p2' connected to a resource box. It is associated with transaction T1 and CSAid1. The bottom box, labeled 'Orig. Setup', shows 'A Party Joined' with port 'c' and 'p1' labeled 'Pending'. It is associated with transaction T2 and CSAid2. + +- Party B is transferred to resource where action specified earlier by SCF (see above) is performed. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Party A is given dial tone. Party A enters DN of Party C to originate a call to Party C. Internal to the SSF/CCF the Orig. Setup CVS for Party A will transit to the Stable 2-party CVS. + +T11100290-98 + +#### **Conference Call – Part 2 (Route Party C to Resource)** + +![Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains two call segments: T1 (CSAid1, M-Party Setup) with Party B 'Joined' and Party A 'Pending'; and T2 (CSAid2, Shared) with Party C 'Joined'. An O_MidCall message is being sent from T2 to the SRF.](e4e0e43b969b09f3ef8ed29722d4d427_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SRF + +T1: Transfer Joined B Party +(1) p1, p2 Joined +CSAid1 +M-Party Setup + +A Party c p2 Pending +Joined (2) + +Shared (1) p1 Joined C Party +CSAid2 + +T2: O\_MidCall (triggertype, \*003, CSAid2, M-Party Setup) + +Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains two call segments: T1 (CSAid1, M-Party Setup) with Party B 'Joined' and Party A 'Pending'; and T2 (CSAid2, Shared) with Party C 'Joined'. An O\_MidCall message is being sent from T2 to the SRF. + +- Active two-party call is established between Parties A and C. +- Party B is still routed through SSF/CCF to resource. Within SSF/CCF, this path is associated with transaction T1. +- Call Party A flashes. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- C Party placed on SSF/CCF based hold. Internal to the SSF/CCF, this causes a CVS transition to M\_Party Setup. +- Dial tone is provided to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Digit collector is connected to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Party A: Enters feature code (e.g. \*003). (*Core Cap. 1*) +- O\_MidCall trigger fires. M Party Setup CVS is sent to the SCF on transaction T2. (*Core Cap. 3*) +- Input of DN instead of feature code by Party A would have resulted in a call being originated, without firing the trigger. + +![Diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SCF sends Provide_Avail_DN to SRF, which responds with Avail_DN_Provided. SCF then initiates T3 (CreateCallSegmentAssociation) to SSF/CCF, which returns CSAid3. SCF also initiates T2 (RequestReportBCSMEvent, MoveCallSegments) to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends Connect (party_c, DN_2) to SRF, which responds with Port_Connected (DN-2).](09797d4289ec96309d21a9a993153dab_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SCF SRF + +Provide\_Avail\_DN (party\_c, action) + +Avail\_DN\_Provided (party\_c, DN\_2) + +T3: CreateCallSegmentAssociation + +T3: Return Result (CSAid3) + +T2: RequestReportBCSMEvent (T\_Disconnect, O\_Disconnect) +MoveCallSegments (Source CSA = CSAid2, Target CSA = CSAid3, Source CSid = 2, new CSid = 1) + +Connect (party\_c, DN\_2) T3 + +Collect\_Info (party\_a) + +Connect (party\_c, DN\_2) + +Port\_Connected (DN-2) + +Diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SCF sends Provide\_Avail\_DN to SRF, which responds with Avail\_DN\_Provided. SCF then initiates T3 (CreateCallSegmentAssociation) to SSF/CCF, which returns CSAid3. SCF also initiates T2 (RequestReportBCSMEvent, MoveCallSegments) to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF sends Connect (party\_c, DN\_2) to SRF, which responds with Port\_Connected (DN-2). + +- SCF invokes service logic based on feature code (e.g. \*003). +- SCF queries resource for an available DN, passes ID of Party C and action to be taken by SRF. +- Resource responds with available DN. +- The SCF initiates a new TCAP transaction, T3, to create a new CSA. The SSF/CCF assigns CSAid3 to the new CSA and returns the ID to the SCF in the Return Result. +- Under TCAP transaction T2, the Move Call Segments moves Party A to the new CSA, disassociating Parties A and B. Request ReportBCSMEvent sets the O/T Disconnect EDPs to monitor C-party disconnect or disconnection of the transferred leg from the SRF (e.g. resulting from a problem). Connect transfers Party C in CSAid2 to the SRF using DN\_2 and transits to the Transfer CVS. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Collect\_Info is sent on transaction T3 (Party A). +- Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 is now associated with Party B's path through the SSF/CCF (i.e. CSAid1), T2 is associated with party C (i.e. CSAid2) and T3 is associated with Party A (i.e. CSAid3). + +![Diagram showing the final state of the call. SSF/CCF contains three call segments: T1 (CSAid1, Transfer) with Party B 'Joined'; T2 (CSAid2, Orig. Setup) with Party C 'Joined'; and T3 (CSAid3, Shared) with Party A 'Pending'.](88842d98d695fe6a281f8af82f9ac951_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SRF + +T1: Transfer Joined B Party +c p1 (1) p2 Joined +CSAid1 + +T2: Transfer Joined C Party +(1) p1 p2 +CSAid2 +Orig. Setup + +A Party Joined c p1 (1) Pending +T3: CSAid3 + +Diagram showing the final state of the call. SSF/CCF contains three call segments: T1 (CSAid1, Transfer) with Party B 'Joined'; T2 (CSAid2, Orig. Setup) with Party C 'Joined'; and T3 (CSAid3, Shared) with Party A 'Pending'. + +- Party C is routed to resource where action specified earlier by SCF (see above) is performed. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Party A is given dial tone. Party A enters DN of Party D to originate a call to Party D. Internal to the SSF/CCF the Orig. Setup CVS for Party A will transit to the Stable 2-party CVS. + +T11100300-98 + +#### Conference Call – Part 3 (Route Party D to Resource) + +![Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains three CSAs. CSAid1 has transaction T1 with Party B joined. CSAid2 has transaction T2 with Party C joined. CSAid3 has transaction T3 with Party A joined (pending) and Party D joined. An O_MidCall message is sent from T3 to the SCF.](d24991add1927bb17af2ee171454a31f_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SRF + +Transfer Joined B Party +T1: c (1) p1 p2 Joined + +CSAid1 + +Transfer Joined C Party +T2: c (1) p1 p2 Joined + +CSAid2 + +M-Party Setup + +A Party Joined +T3: c (2) p1 Pending + +Shared c (1) p2 Joined D Party + +CSAid3 + +T3: O\_MidCall (triggertype, \*003, CSAid3, M-Party Setup, ...) + +Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains three CSAs. CSAid1 has transaction T1 with Party B joined. CSAid2 has transaction T2 with Party C joined. CSAid3 has transaction T3 with Party A joined (pending) and Party D joined. An O\_MidCall message is sent from T3 to the SCF. + +- Active two-party call is established between Parties A and D. +- Parties B and C are still routed through SSF/CCF to resource. Within SSF/CCF, these paths are associated with transactions T1 and T2. +- Call Party A flashes. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- D party placed on SSF/CCF based hold. Internal to the SSF/CCF, this causes a CVS transition to M\_Party Setup. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Dial tone is provided to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Digit collector is connected to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Party A: Enters feature code (e.g. \*003). (*Core Cap. 1*) +- O\_MidCall trigger fires. M-Party Setup CVS is sent to the SCF on transaction T3. (*Core Cap. 3*) +- Input of DN instead of feature code by Party A would have resulted in a call being originated, without firing the trigger. + +![Signaling flow diagram between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. Messages include Provide_Avail_DN, Avail_DN_Provided, CreateCallSegmentAssociation, Return Result, RequestReportBCSMEVENT, MoveCallSegments, Connect, Collect_Info, and Port_Connected.](893d65bf826925a7283359b1672010a0_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SCF SRF + +Provide\_Avail\_DN (party\_d, action) + +Avail\_DN\_Provided (party\_d, DN\_3) + +T4: CreateCallSegmentAssociation + +T4: Return Result (CSAid4) + +T3: RequestReportBCSMEVENT (T\_Disconnect, O\_Disconnect) + +MoveCallSegments (Source CSA = CSAid3, Target CSA = CSAid4, Source CSid = 2, new CSid = 1) + +Connect (party\_d, DN\_3) + +T4: Collect\_Info (party\_a) + +Connect (party\_d, DN\_3) + +Port\_Connected (DN\_3) + +Signaling flow diagram between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. Messages include Provide\_Avail\_DN, Avail\_DN\_Provided, CreateCallSegmentAssociation, Return Result, RequestReportBCSMEVENT, MoveCallSegments, Connect, Collect\_Info, and Port\_Connected. + +- SCF invokes service logic based on feature code (e.g. \*003). +- SCF queries resource for an available DN, passes ID of Party D and action to be taken by SRF. +- Resource responds with available DN. +- The SCF initiates a new TCAP transaction, T4, to create a new CSA. The SSF/CCF assigns CSAid4 to the new CSA and returns the ID to the SCF in the Return Result. +- Under TCAP transaction T3, the Move Call Segments moves Party A to the new CSA, disassociating Parties A and D. RequestReportBCSMEVENT sets the O/T Disconnect EDPs to monitor D-party disconnect or disconnection of the transferred leg from the SRF (e.g. resulting from a problem). Connect transfers Party D in CSAid3 to the SRF using DN\_3 and transits to the Transfer CVS. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Collect\_Info is sent on transaction T4 (Party A). +- Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 is now associated with Party B's path through the SSF/CCF (i.e. CSAid1), T2 is associated with Party C (i.e. CSAid2), T3 with Party D (CSAid3) and T4 with Party A (e.g. CSAid4). + +![Diagram showing the final state. SSF/CCF has four CSAs. CSAid1 (T1, Party B), CSAid2 (T2, Party C), and CSAid3 (T3, Party D) are all joined to the SRF. CSAid4 (T4, Party A) is in Orig. Setup state (pending).](de18140c2e0030a43004b58338467655_img.jpg) + +SSF/CCF SRF + +Transfer Joined B Party +T1: c (1) p1 p2 Joined + +CSAid1 + +Transfer Joined C Party +T2: c (1) p1 p2 Joined + +CSAid2 + +Transfer Joined D Party +T3: c (1) p1 p2 Joined + +CSAid3 + +A Party Orig. Setup +T4: c (1) p1 Pending + +CSAid4 + +Diagram showing the final state. SSF/CCF has four CSAs. CSAid1 (T1, Party B), CSAid2 (T2, Party C), and CSAid3 (T3, Party D) are all joined to the SRF. CSAid4 (T4, Party A) is in Orig. Setup state (pending). + +- Party D is routed to resource where action specified earlier by SCF (see above) is performed. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Party A is given dial tone. + +T11100310-98 + +#### Conference Call – Part 4 (Route Party A to Resource) + +![Sequence diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains four transactions: T1 (B Party), T2 (C Party), T3 (D Party), and T4 (A Party). T1, T2, and T3 are 'Transfer Joined' and 'Joined' to the SRF. T4 is 'Orig.Setup' and 'Pending'. An arrow labeled 'Analysed_Info. (trigger_type, *004, Orig.Setup, ...)' points from T4 towards the SCF.](61474739fd197587cfea52af9b6a3885_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the initial state of a conference call. SSF/CCF contains four transactions: T1 (B Party), T2 (C Party), T3 (D Party), and T4 (A Party). T1, T2, and T3 are 'Transfer Joined' and 'Joined' to the SRF. T4 is 'Orig.Setup' and 'Pending'. An arrow labeled 'Analysed\_Info. (trigger\_type, \*004, Orig.Setup, ...)' points from T4 towards the SCF. + +- Parties B, C and D are still routed through SSF/CCF to resource. Within the SSF/CCF, these paths are associated with transactions T1, T2 and T3. +- Call Party A enters feature code (e.g. \*004) to include itself in the conference call. +- Orig. Setup CVS is sent to SCF from Analysed\_Info DP on Transaction T4. (*Core Cap. 3*) + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF and SRF. SCF sends 'Provide_Avail_DN (party_a, action)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Avail_DN_Provided (party_a, DN_4)'. SCF then sends 'Connect (party_a, DN_4)' to SSF/CCF, which in turn sends 'Connect (party_a, DN_4)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Port_Connected (DN_4)' to SCF.](137bcfed81ada68ca5162ca5afed35c7_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF and SRF. SCF sends 'Provide\_Avail\_DN (party\_a, action)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Avail\_DN\_Provided (party\_a, DN\_4)'. SCF then sends 'Connect (party\_a, DN\_4)' to SSF/CCF, which in turn sends 'Connect (party\_a, DN\_4)' to SRF. SRF responds with 'Port\_Connected (DN\_4)' to SCF. + +- SCF invokes service logic based on feature code (e.g. \*004). +- SCF queries resource for an available DN, passes ID of Party A and action to be taken by SRF. +- Resource responds with available DN. +- SCF directs SSF/CCF over Transaction T4 to connect Party A to the SRF (i.e. routing DN\_4). (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T4 remains associated with Party A's path through the SSF/CCF. + +![Sequence diagram showing the final state. T1, T2, and T3 remain 'Transfer Joined' and 'Joined' to the SRF. T4 is now 'Stable 2-Party' and 'Joined' to the SRF. An arrow points from T4 to the SRF.](9ac8c3c5f82f3ec93caf43124af62cb2_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the final state. T1, T2, and T3 remain 'Transfer Joined' and 'Joined' to the SRF. T4 is now 'Stable 2-Party' and 'Joined' to the SRF. An arrow points from T4 to the SRF. + +- Party A is routed to resource where action specified earlier by SCF (see above) is performed. (*Core Cap. 2*) + +#### Conference Call – Part 5 (Bridging at the Resource) + +![Diagram showing the initial state of four parties (T1, T2, T3, T4) connected to an SRF. T1 is 'Transfer Joined B Party', T2 is 'Transfer Joined C Party', T3 is 'Transfer D Party', and T4 is 'Stable 2 Party'. All are 'Joined' to the SRF. CSAid1, CSAid2, CSAid3, and CSAid4 are associated with each party.](819708f96460bb2b90e965ace616f179_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing the initial state of four parties (T1, T2, T3, T4) connected to an SRF. T1 is 'Transfer Joined B Party', T2 is 'Transfer Joined C Party', T3 is 'Transfer D Party', and T4 is 'Stable 2 Party'. All are 'Joined' to the SRF. CSAid1, CSAid2, CSAid3, and CSAid4 are associated with each party. + +- Parties A, B, C and D have been routed to the resource. +- Party A is the controlling party. + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF and SRF. SCF sends a Get_Resource request with resource_type = bridge and resource_attr = n-way. SRF returns a Return_Resource_ID. SCF then sends a Connect_Ports request with resource_ID and DN-1, DN_2, DN_3, DN_4. SRF responds with a Port_Connected message.](86986d4dfd54f298d7b9fa9f82ab3009_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SCF and SRF. SCF sends a Get\_Resource request with resource\_type = bridge and resource\_attr = n-way. SRF returns a Return\_Resource\_ID. SCF then sends a Connect\_Ports request with resource\_ID and DN-1, DN\_2, DN\_3, DN\_4. SRF responds with a Port\_Connected message. + +- SCF requests the use of an N-way bridging resource and that the four DNs used for Parties A, B, C and D be connected to the bridging resource. +- Connect\_Ports can handle 1 to n ports. +- At any time, Party A disconnect can occur under the following conditions: + - Party A goes on hook. +- At any time, Party B disconnect can occur under the following conditions: + - Party B goes on hook; + - Party A flashes and enters feature code (e.g. \*007). +(Core Cap. 1) +- At any time, Party C disconnect can occur under the following conditions: + - Party C goes on hook; + - Party A flashes and enters feature code (e.g. \*008). +(Core Cap. 1) +- At any time, Party D disconnect can occur under the following conditions: + - Party D goes on hook; + - Party A flashes and enters feature code (e.g. \*009). +(Core Cap. 1) + +![Diagram showing the final state where all four parties (T1, T2, T3, T4) are now connected in an N-way cell. T1 is 'Transfer Joined B Party', T2 is 'Transfer Joined C Party', T3 is 'Transfer D Party', and T4 is 'Stable 2-party'. All are 'Joined' to the SRF. CSAid1, CSAid2, CSAid3, and CSAid4 are associated with each party.](15a7570852cac42d754e4a0e50b1dfbe_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing the final state where all four parties (T1, T2, T3, T4) are now connected in an N-way cell. T1 is 'Transfer Joined B Party', T2 is 'Transfer Joined C Party', T3 is 'Transfer D Party', and T4 is 'Stable 2-party'. All are 'Joined' to the SRF. CSAid1, CSAid2, CSAid3, and CSAid4 are associated with each party. + +- Parties A, B, C and D are now connected in an N-way cell. + +T11100330-98 + +#### **Conference Call - Part 6 (Party Disconnect at the Resource, Initiated by Party A)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the initial state of a conference call with parties A, B, C, and D connected to a resource (SRF) via an SSF/CCF. The diagram shows transactions T1 through T4, including 'Transfer Joined' for parties B, C, and D, and 'M Party Setup' for party A. Party A's connection is shown as 'Pending' with a digit collector (2) active.](659defdb54c35d60d4bb11a37b583228_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the initial state of a conference call. At the top, SSF/CCF and SRF are shown. Below them, four parties (A, B, C, D) are connected to the SRF. + +T1: Party B is transferred and joined. CSAid1 is associated with this transaction. + +T2: Party C is transferred and joined. CSAid2 is associated with this transaction. + +T3: Party D is transferred and joined. CSAid3 is associated with this transaction. + +T4: Party A is joined via 'M Party Setup'. The connection is shown as 'Pending' on the SSF/CCF side, with 'p2' and 'c' (connection) indicated. CSAid4 is associated with this transaction. + +An arrow labeled 'O\_Midcall (trigger\_type, \*008, CSAid4, M-Party Setup, ...)' points from the SSF/CCF towards the SCF. + +Sequence diagram showing the initial state of a conference call with parties A, B, C, and D connected to a resource (SRF) via an SSF/CCF. The diagram shows transactions T1 through T4, including 'Transfer Joined' for parties B, C, and D, and 'M Party Setup' for party A. Party A's connection is shown as 'Pending' with a digit collector (2) active. + +- Parties A, B, C and D are connected in an N-way call. +- Call Party A flashes. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Party A's connection to resource is placed on SSF/CCF based hold. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Dial tone is provided to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Digit collector is connected to A Party. (*Core Cap. 1*) +- Party A enters feature code to disconnect Party C (e.g. \*008). (*Core Cap. 1*) +- O\_MidCall trigger fires (*Core Cap. 1*) and M-Party Setup CVS is sent to the SCF on transaction T4. (*Core Cap. 3*) + +![Sequence diagram showing the release of Party C's connection. The SCF sends a ReleaseCall (party_c) to the SSF/CCF on transaction T2. The SSF/CCF then sends a Disconnect (Party C, DN_2) to the SRF, which responds with Port_Disconnected (DN_2).](c15cb6383bc35906e6b3c7c3aac621ed_img.jpg) + +This diagram shows the release of Party C's connection. + +The SCF sends a 'ReleaseCall (party\_c)' message to the SSF/CCF on transaction T2. + +The SSF/CCF responds with 'Continue' on transaction T4. + +The SSF/CCF then sends a 'Disconnect (Party C, DN\_2)' message to the SRF. + +The SRF responds with 'Port\_Disconnected (DN\_2)' to the SSF/CCF. + +Sequence diagram showing the release of Party C's connection. The SCF sends a ReleaseCall (party\_c) to the SSF/CCF on transaction T2. The SSF/CCF then sends a Disconnect (Party C, DN\_2) to the SRF, which responds with Port\_Disconnected (DN\_2). + +- Normal release of a connection applies. The SCF sends a ReleaseCall to the SSF/CCF on transaction T2 to release the call associated with Party C. + +![Sequence diagram showing the final state of the conference call. Party C has been disconnected. Party A's connection is now a 'Stable 2-party' call with the SRF. Parties B and D remain connected.](98e725c7b96935429b312ff8d22b6313_img.jpg) + +This diagram shows the final state of the conference call after Party C has been disconnected. + +T1: Party B remains connected ('Transfer Joined', CSAid1). + +T2: The transaction for Party C is now empty, indicating it has closed. + +T3: Party D remains connected ('Transfer Joined', CSAid3). + +T4: Party A's connection is now a 'Stable 2-party' call with the SRF ('A Party Joined', CSAid4). + +Sequence diagram showing the final state of the conference call. Party C has been disconnected. Party A's connection is now a 'Stable 2-party' call with the SRF. Parties B and D remain connected. + +- T2 closes since no subsequent EDPs were set. +- Party A continues with the active call to the resource and is still communicating with Parties B and D. + +T11100340-98 + +#### Conference Call – Part 7 (Party Disconnect at the Resource, Party B hangup) + +![Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call with four parties (A, B, C, D) connected to a Single Resource Function (SRF). Party B is in the 'Null' state, while A, C, and D are 'Joined'.](3abb87a27232fe2f2806b67f2e5e1390_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the initial state of a conference call. On the left, four transaction boxes (T1, T2, T3, T4) represent the parties. T1 (B Party) is in the 'Null' state. T2 (C Party) and T3 (D Party) are in the 'Transfer Joined' state, connected to the SRF via ports p1 and p2. T4 (A Party) is in the 'Stable 2-party' state, also connected to the SRF. The SRF is shown as a vertical bar on the right. + +Diagram showing the initial state of a conference call with four parties (A, B, C, D) connected to a Single Resource Function (SRF). Party B is in the 'Null' state, while A, C, and D are 'Joined'. + +- Parties A, B, C and D are connected in an N-way call. +- Call Party B goes on hook. +- O/T\_Disconnect EDP fires and existing Transfer CVS for Party B is sent to the SCF on transaction T1. (*Core Cap. 3*). The SCF responds with a ReleaseCall to clear Party B from the conference and transit B to the Null CVS. + +![Sequence of messages between the SCF and SRF for disconnecting Party B: O/T_Disconnect, ReleaseCall, and Disconnect.](511f9b05a4c458937dd12c30936fd7d6_img.jpg) + +This sequence shows the interaction between the Service Control Function (SCF) and the SRF to disconnect Party B. The SCF sends an 'O/T\_Disconnect' message to the SRF. The SRF responds with a 'ReleaseCall (Party B)' message. Finally, the SCF sends a 'Disconnect (Party B, DN\_1)' message to the SRF. + +Sequence of messages between the SCF and SRF for disconnecting Party B: O/T\_Disconnect, ReleaseCall, and Disconnect. + +- Normal release of a connection applies. + +![Sequence of messages between the SCF and SRF: Port_Disconnected (DN_1).](2f108a589e99e93fd7aa8fac626398c7_img.jpg) + +This sequence shows the SCF sending a 'Port\_Disconnected (DN\_1)' message to the SRF, indicating the completion of the disconnect process for Party B. + +Sequence of messages between the SCF and SRF: Port\_Disconnected (DN\_1). + +![Diagram showing the final state of the conference call after Party B has disconnected. Party B is now in the 'Transfer Joined' state, and the other parties remain connected.](6424fc1c7a7c26364a135780c1e479f9_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the final state of the conference call. Party B (T1) is now in the 'Transfer Joined' state. Parties C (T2) and D (T3) remain in the 'Transfer Joined' state, and Party A (T4) remains in the 'Stable 2-party' state. All parties are still connected to the SRF. + +Diagram showing the final state of the conference call after Party B has disconnected. Party B is now in the 'Transfer Joined' state, and the other parties remain connected. + +- T1 closes since no subsequent EDPs were set. + +T11100350-98 + +#### Conference Call – Part 8 (Re-establish Call at SSF/CCF) + +![Sequence diagram showing the re-establishment of a conference call between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the disconnection of Party C and the subsequent merging of Parties A and D into a stable 2-party call.](dc075f714892571abc5f74f1a76b80dc_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of events: + +- Initial State:** + - SSF/CCF: Null + - SRF: Contains a bridging resource. + - Party C (T2): Connected to SRF via CSAid2 (Transfer Joined). + - Party D (T3): Connected to SRF via CSAid3 (Stable 2-party). + - Party A (T4): Connected to SRF via CSAid4 (Stable 2-party). +- Disconnection of Party C:** + - T2: SSF/CCF sends **O/T\_Disconnect** (triggertype, CSAid2, Transfer CVS, ...) to SCF. + - SCF responds with **ReleaseCall** (party C) to SSF/CCF. + - SSF/CCF sends **Disconnect** (Party C, DN\_2) to SRF. +- Reconfiguration:** + - SRF reports **Port\_Disconnected** (DN\_2) to SCF. + - SCF sends **DisconnectLeg** (Leg p1) to SSF/CCF (T4). + - SCF sends **DisconnectLeg** (Leg p2) to SSF/CCF (T3). + - SCF sends **MoveCallSegments** (SourceCSA = CSAid3, TargetCSA = CSAid4, SourceCSid = 1, Target CSid = 2) to SSF/CCF. + - SSF/CCF sends **Disconnect** (Party D, DN\_3) and **Disconnect** (Party A, DN\_4) to SRF. +- Closing of Party C's Call:** + - SSF/CCF: CSAid3 is deleted. + - SRF: CSAid3 is deleted. + - Transaction T3 is closed. +- Merging of Parties A and D:** + - SSF/CCF: Party A (T4) is in a **Pending** state within CSAid4. + - SCF sends **MergeCallSegments** (Source = CSid2, Target = CSid1) to SSF/CCF (T4). + - SSF/CCF sends **Port\_Disconnected** (DN\_4) and **Port\_Disconnected** (DN\_3) to SCF. + - SCF sends **Release\_Resource** (Resource\_ID) to SRF twice. + - SSF/CCF: Parties A and D are now in a **Stable 2-party** call within CSAid4. + - Transaction T4 remains open. + +Sequence diagram showing the re-establishment of a conference call between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. It details the disconnection of Party C and the subsequent merging of Parties A and D into a stable 2-party call. + +- Parties A, C and D are connected in an N-way call. +- Call Party C goes on hook. +- O/T\_Disconnect EDP fires and existing Transfer CVS for Party C is sent to the SCF on transaction T2. (*Core Cap. 3*). The SCF responds with a ReleaseCall to clear Party C from the conference and transit C to the Null CVS. +- Normal release of a connection applies to Party C. + +- The SRF reports Party C's port is disconnected to the SRF. At this point the SCF understands that the bridging resource is only being used for a two-way connection between Parties A and D. Therefore, the SCF begins the process to terminate use of the resource and connect Parties A and D in the SSF. +- DisconnectLeg (p1) is sent on transaction T4 to disconnect A from the resource. +- DisconnectLeg (p2) is sent on transaction T3 to disconnect D from the resource. +- Party D's call segment (CSid1 inside CSAid3) is moved to CSAid4 and renumbered (CSid2). Party D is now associated with Party A in CSAid4. (*Core Cap. 4*) + +- CSAid3 is deleted since it contains no further call segments. +- Transaction T3 is closed. + +- MergeCallSegments is sent on transaction T4 to the SSF/CCF which then merges the calls for Parties A and D into a Stable 2-Party Call. (*Core Cap. 4*) + +- The SCF initiates the release of the bridging resource when it is notified that no ports are making use of the resource. + +- The transaction between the SCF and SRF is closed. + +- Only transaction T4 remains open with Parties A and D in a Stable 2-party call in the SSF/CCF. + +T11100360-98 + +### A.4.3 Meet-Me Conference + +The following diagrams are used to illustrate how the Meet-Me Conference feature can be implemented using the Call Party Handling (CPH) Hybrid Approach. The notation (*Core Cap. x*) indicates that a description corresponds to Core Capability *x*, where *x* = 1, 2, 3 or 4. The four Core Capabilities as identified in Recommendation Q.1224 are: + +- 1) Core capability 1 allows for a user to enter information during a midcall event; +- 2) Core capability 2 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to connect a call party to an external resource to perform a transfer; +- 3) Core capability 3 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to present the current view of the call to the SCF; +- 4) Core capability 4 is the ability of the SSF/CCF to combine separate calls into a single call. + +These diagrams depict how parties are established in the Meet-Me conference and connected to the SRF. Once the conference parties are established, additional details as to manipulation of connections at the resource and the disconnect possibilities are equivalent to those that are illustrated in the previous scenarios for Conference Call (see A.4.2) and are therefore not repeated here. + +#### **Meet-Me Conference – Part 1 (Route Party B to Resource)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF for Meet-Me Conference Part 1. It includes state diagrams for Transaction T1 at the SSF/CCF and a series of messages between the components.](cf8650780cc9719622f013f33967b37c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for routing Party B to the resource in a Meet-Me Conference. It is divided into three phases by horizontal dashed lines. + +**Initial State:** At the SSF/CCF, Transaction T1 is shown in a state diagram. It has two states: 'Pending' (containing sub-states 'c' and 'p1') and 'Joined Party B' (containing sub-state 'p1'). The identifier 'CSAid1' is associated with the transaction. + +**Phase 1: Termination Attempt** + A message `Termination_Attempt (triggertype, CSAid1, party_b, ...)` is sent from the SSF/CCF to the SCF. + +**Phase 2: PIN Collection and Setup** + The following messages are exchanged: + - SSF/CCF to SCF: `Connect_to_Resource (party_b)` + - SSF/CCF to SCF: `Prompt_and_Collect_User_Information` + - SCF to SRF: `Setup` + - SRF to SCF: `Collected_User_Information` + - SSF/CCF to SCF: `Disc_Fwd_Connection` + - SCF to SRF: `Disconnect` + +**Phase 3: Routing and Connection** + The following messages are exchanged: + - SCF to SRF: `Provide_Avail_DN (party_b, action)` + - SRF to SCF: `Avail_DN_Provided (party_b, DN_1)` + - SCF to SSF/CCF: `RequestReportBCSMEEvent (t_Disconnect.O_Disconnect)` + - SCF to SSF/CCF: `Connect (party_b, DN_1)` + +**Final State:** At the SSF/CCF, Transaction T1 is shown in a 'Transfer' state diagram. It contains sub-states 'c', 'p1', and 'p2'. 'p1' is labeled 'Joined Party B' and 'p2' is labeled 'Joined'. A line connects the 'p1' sub-state to a box representing the SRF. The identifier 'CSAid1' is associated with the transaction. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF for Meet-Me Conference Part 1. It includes state diagrams for Transaction T1 at the SSF/CCF and a series of messages between the components. + +- Initially, no IN relationships exist. + - Incoming call from Party B arrives at SSF/CCF at the Meet-Me Conference DN. +- +- An SRF is used to collect the PIN information from Party B. This SRF may be different than the SRF in which the conference bridge is located. + - This is an IN CS-1 "Play Announcement and Collect Digits" capable SRF. +- +- SCF acquires a routing DN. + - Party B is routed to the resource. *(Core Cap 2)* + - Request ReportBCSMEEvent sets the O/T Disconnect EDPs to monitor B-party disconnect or disconnection of the transferred leg from the SRF (e.g. resulting from a problem). Connect transfers Party B in CSAid1 to the SRF using DN\_1 and transits to the Transfer CVS. *(Core Cap. 2)* + - Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 is now associated with Party B's path through the SSF/CCF (CSAid1). + +T11100370-98 + +#### **Meet-Me Conference – Part 2 (Route Party C to Resource)** + +![Sequence diagram for the initial state of a Meet-Me conference. It shows three entities: SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SSF/CCF contains two transaction boxes, T1 and T2. T1 is labeled 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party B', with internal components 'c', '1', 'p1', 'p2', and 'CSAid1'. T2 is labeled 'Pending', 'Term. Setup', and 'Joined Party C', with internal components 'c', '1', 'p1', and 'CSAid2'. Arrows show 'Transfer' and 'Termination_Attempt' messages from SSF/CCF to SCF. The SRF is shown as an empty box on the right.](42d1ffab6bbf720e8421aeace0808924_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for the initial state of a Meet-Me conference. It shows three entities: SSF/CCF, SCF, and SRF. SSF/CCF contains two transaction boxes, T1 and T2. T1 is labeled 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party B', with internal components 'c', '1', 'p1', 'p2', and 'CSAid1'. T2 is labeled 'Pending', 'Term. Setup', and 'Joined Party C', with internal components 'c', '1', 'p1', and 'CSAid2'. Arrows show 'Transfer' and 'Termination\_Attempt' messages from SSF/CCF to SCF. The SRF is shown as an empty box on the right. + +- Initially, no IN relationships exist. +- Incoming call from Party C arrives at SSF/CCF at the Meet-Me Conference DN. + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction for PIN collection. SSF/CCF sends 'Connect_to_Resource (party_c)' and 'Prompt_and_Collect_User_Information' to SCF. SCF sends 'Setup' to SRF. SRF returns 'Collected_User_Information' to SCF. SCF then sends 'Disc_Fwd_Connection' and 'Disconnect' to SSF/CCF.](9ef15a4afab1416db28b91184862a3a5_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction for PIN collection. SSF/CCF sends 'Connect\_to\_Resource (party\_c)' and 'Prompt\_and\_Collect\_User\_Information' to SCF. SCF sends 'Setup' to SRF. SRF returns 'Collected\_User\_Information' to SCF. SCF then sends 'Disc\_Fwd\_Connection' and 'Disconnect' to SSF/CCF. + +- An SRF is used to collect the PIN information from Party C. This SRF may be different than the SRF in which the conference bridge is located. +- This is an IN CS-1 "Play Announcement and Collect Digits" capable SRF. + +![Sequence diagram showing the routing and transaction association. SCF sends 'Provide_Avail_DN (party_c, action)' to SRF. SRF returns 'Avail_DN_Provided (party_c, DN_2)'. SCF sends 'RequestReportBCSMEvent_{(t_Disconnect_O_Disconnect)}' and 'Connect (party_c, DN_2)' to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF updates transaction T1 to 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party B' (with CSAid1) and T2 to 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party C' (with CSAid2), both now connected to the SRF.](5525e7460947727851585808324e1f98_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the routing and transaction association. SCF sends 'Provide\_Avail\_DN (party\_c, action)' to SRF. SRF returns 'Avail\_DN\_Provided (party\_c, DN\_2)'. SCF sends 'RequestReportBCSMEvent\_{(t\_Disconnect\_O\_Disconnect)}' and 'Connect (party\_c, DN\_2)' to SSF/CCF. SSF/CCF updates transaction T1 to 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party B' (with CSAid1) and T2 to 'Transfer' and 'Joined Party C' (with CSAid2), both now connected to the SRF. + +- SCF acquires a routing DN. +- Party C is routed to the resource. (*Core Cap. 2*) +- Request ReportBCSMEvent sets the O/T Disconnect EDPs to monitor C-party disconnect or disconnection of the transferred leg from the SRF (e.g., resulting from a problem). Connect transfers Party C in CSAid2 to the SRF using DN\_2 and transits to the Transfer CVS. (*Core Cap. 2*). +- Within the SSF/CCF, transaction T1 is now associated with Party B's path through the SSF/CCF (CSAid1) and T2 is associated with Party C. + +T11100380-98 + +## A.5 Internetwork Service Profile Transfer + +### A.5.1 Capability statement + +Inter-Network Service Profile Transfer (ISPT) is a CS-2 telecommunications service feature which enables service profile information to be transferred to other service profile storage locations in other service providers. It is required to enable User Profile Information Portability. + +### A.5.2 Textual description + +Consider three service providers, A, B and C in Figure A.8, who are cooperating to provide distributed mobility service. + +![Diagram illustrating the Mobility Service Provider scenario with three service providers (A, B, and C) each containing an SDP and an SCP.](e3026761f1da20ee91832039701984dd_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows three service providers, A, B, and C, each represented by a cloud. Inside each cloud, there is a stick figure representing a subscriber and a pair of stacked boxes representing the Service Data Profile (SDP) and Service Control Point (SCP). In Service provider A, the subscriber is on the left, and the SDP/SCP are on the right. In Service provider B, the subscriber is on the left, and the SDP/SCP are on the right. In Service provider C, the SDP/SCP are on the left, and the subscriber is on the right. A small text label 'T11100390-98' is located to the right of Service provider C. + +Diagram illustrating the Mobility Service Provider scenario with three service providers (A, B, and C) each containing an SDP and an SCP. + +**Figure A.8/Q.1229 – Mobility Service Provider scenario** + +In this example, each service provider has one SDP and has local mobility subscribers. Each SDP stores customer and service provider data, including mobility subscriber profiles. + +#### A.5.2.1 Shadowing agreements + +Service providers A and B have a requirement to share (shadow) roaming subscriber profiles. A shadowing agreement is an agreement to copy data between two SDPs, where one SDP holds the master data and the other SDP holds selected copies of the master data. As shown in Figure A.9, SDP A and B could maintain a shadowing agreement (shadowing agreement AB) for those users which are local to service provider A but can roam to service provider B. That is, when a user from service provider A roams to service provider B, SDP A will provide a shadow update, containing the roaming user's profile, to SDP B. + +![Diagram of shadowing agreements between three service providers (A, B, and C). Service provider A is connected to both B and C via shadowing agreements labeled AB and AC respectively. Each provider has an SDP and an SCP component, and a subscriber icon is shown within each provider's cloud.](b5ce6d659e1431289c2e79b01bf38a15_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates three service providers, A, B, and C, each represented by a cloud containing a subscriber icon, an SDP (Service Data Point), and an SCP (Service Control Point). Service provider A is at the top left, B is at the top right, and C is at the bottom center. Arrows indicate shadowing agreements: one from A to B labeled 'Shadowing agreement AB', and another from A to C labeled 'Shadowing agreement AC'. A small text label 'T11100400-98' is located in the bottom right corner of the diagram area. + +Diagram of shadowing agreements between three service providers (A, B, and C). Service provider A is connected to both B and C via shadowing agreements labeled AB and AC respectively. Each provider has an SDP and an SCP component, and a subscriber icon is shown within each provider's cloud. + +**Figure A.9/Q.1229 – Shadowing agreements** + +A similar shadowing agreement (shadowing agreement BA) can be maintained for those instances where SDP B is the shadow supplier and SDP A is the shadow consumer. Shadowing agreements can also be arranged to support the cooperation of service providers A and C and service providers B and C. + +#### **A.5.2.2 Subscriber roams from home to visited service provider** + +Consider a subscriber whose service provider of choice is service provider A. As shown in Figure A.10, a user roaming into another service provider would result in the newly visited service provider receiving a copy of the roaming user's profile. + +![Diagram showing the interaction when a subscriber roams from service provider A to service provider B. Step (1) shows the user arriving at B. Step (2) shows B sending information to A. Step (3) shows A responding to B. Service provider C is shown separately at the bottom.](d579d14979ebeaa676740df2e3dbe024_img.jpg) + +This diagram shows the interaction when a subscriber roams from service provider A (home) to service provider B (visited). The subscriber is represented by an icon moving from A to B. Step (1) is an arrow from the subscriber to B. Step (2) is an arrow from B to A. Step (3) is an arrow from A to B. Service provider C is shown at the bottom, unconnected. A small text label 'T11100410-98' is located in the bottom right corner of the diagram area. + +Diagram showing the interaction when a subscriber roams from service provider A to service provider B. Step (1) shows the user arriving at B. Step (2) shows B sending information to A. Step (3) shows A responding to B. Service provider C is shown separately at the bottom. + +**Figure A.10/Q.1229 – Subscriber roams from home to visited service provider** + +When the subscriber roams to service provider B, service provider B detects the presence of the roaming user. Service provider B then collects service and authentication information from the subscriber's equipment. From this information service provider B can determine the subscriber's unique identity and home service provider. + +SCP B then modifies the visiting subscriber's profile, on the subscriber's home SDP, to indicate it as belonging to shadowing agreement AB. SDP A detects the change in its master information and sends a copy of the subscriber's profile to SDP B. + +Figure A.11 illustrates the corresponding message sequence chart. + +![Sequence diagram for Figure A.11 showing interactions between a user, SCP B, SDP B, and SDP A.](cccf3125a7354e1865653731de1ca03d_img.jpg) + +This sequence diagram illustrates the message exchange for home-to-visited service provider operations. The participants are a user (represented by an icon), SCP B, SDP B, and SDP A. The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- Initial Event:** A new roaming user is detected and authenticated by service provider B. +- Request:** SCP B sends a "Bind Request, Modify Request" to SDP B. +- Forwarding:** SDP B forwards this as a "Bind Request, Chained Modify Request" to SDP A. +- Response:** SDP A returns a "Bind Response, Chained Modify Response" to SDP B. +- Update Request:** SDP B then sends a "Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request" to SDP A. +- Final Response:** SDP A returns a "Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, Update Response" to SDP B. +- Final Event:** The user profile is copied to service provider B. + +The diagram is labeled with the code T111100420-98. + +Sequence diagram for Figure A.11 showing interactions between a user, SCP B, SDP B, and SDP A. + +**Figure A.11/Q.1229 – Home to visited service provider message sequence chart** + +Figure A.11 shows the case where directory operations are all sent in the same PDU and does not include message sequences for errors or for unbinding. + +#### A.5.2.3 Subscriber roams from one visited service provider to another + +Now suppose that the subscriber roams from service provider B to service provider C, as illustrated in Figure A.12. This would result in the copy of the roaming user's profile being removed from the previously visited service provider and being supplied to the newly visited service provider. + +![Diagram for Figure A.12 showing subscriber roaming from service provider B to service provider C.](3ea179b463e612d0285714550eaf5c09_img.jpg) + +This diagram illustrates the network architecture and signaling for subscriber roaming between visited service providers. It shows three service providers: A, B, and C. Each provider contains an SDP (Service Data Point) and an SCP (Service Control Point). The signaling steps are numbered: + +- (1)** Service provider B sends a message to the user's equipment. +- (2)** Service provider C sends a message to the user's equipment. +- (3)** Service provider A sends a message to Service provider B. +- (4)** Service provider A sends a message to Service provider C. + +The diagram is labeled with the code T111100430-98. + +Diagram for Figure A.12 showing subscriber roaming from service provider B to service provider C. + +**Figure A.12/Q.1229 – Subscriber roams from one visited service provider to another** + +When the subscriber roams to service provider C, service provider C detects the presence of the roaming user. The service provider then collects service and authentication information from the subscriber's equipment. From this information service provider C can determine the subscriber's unique identity and home service provider. + +SCP C then modifies the visiting subscriber's profile, on the subscriber's home SDP, to indicate it as belonging to shadowing agreement AC. SDP A detects the change in its master information, deletes the copy of the subscriber's profile on SDP B, and then sends a copy of the subscriber's profile to SDP C. + +Figure A.13 shows the case where directory operations are all sent in the same PDU and does not include message sequences for errors or for unbinding. + +![Sequence diagram for Figure A.13 showing interactions between a user, SCP C, SDP C, SDP A, and SDP B. The diagram illustrates three scenarios: 1) New roaming user detected and authenticated by service provider C, where SCP C sends Bind/Modify requests to SDP C, which responds and then sends Shadow Bind/Coordinate Update requests to SDP A, which in turn sends responses to SDP B and back to SDP C. 2) User profile deleted from service provider B, where SDP A sends a Shadow Bind/Coordinate Update request to SDP C. 3) User profile copied to service provider C, where SDP C sends a Bind/Coordinate Update response to SDP A.](87f8b579bc67022e8dd0a0a50585fd4d_img.jpg) + +The sequence diagram illustrates the following interactions: + +- Initial State:** A user is detected and authenticated by service provider C. +- Step 1:** SCP C sends a "Bind Request, Modify Request" to SDP C. +- Step 2:** SDP C responds with "Bind Response, Chained Modify Response, Bind Response, Modify Response" to SCP C. +- Step 3:** SDP C then sends "Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request" to SDP A. +- Step 4:** SDP A responds with "Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, Update Response" to SDP C. +- Step 5:** SDP C further sends "Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, Update Response" to SDP B. +- Subsequent Scenarios:** + - User profile deleted from service provider B:** SDP A sends a "Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request" to SDP C. + - User profile copied to service provider C:** SDP C sends a "Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, Update Response" to SDP A. + +T11100440-98 + +Sequence diagram for Figure A.13 showing interactions between a user, SCP C, SDP C, SDP A, and SDP B. The diagram illustrates three scenarios: 1) New roaming user detected and authenticated by service provider C, where SCP C sends Bind/Modify requests to SDP C, which responds and then sends Shadow Bind/Coordinate Update requests to SDP A, which in turn sends responses to SDP B and back to SDP C. 2) User profile deleted from service provider B, where SDP A sends a Shadow Bind/Coordinate Update request to SDP C. 3) User profile copied to service provider C, where SDP C sends a Bind/Coordinate Update response to SDP A. + +**Figure A.13/Q.1229 – Visited service provider to visited service provider message sequence chart** + +#### A.5.2.4 Subscriber roams visited to home service provider + +Suppose, finally, that the subscriber roams back to the home service provider, as shown in Figure A.14. + +![Diagram for Figure A.14 showing a subscriber roaming from Service provider C (visited) back to Service provider A (home). Service provider B is also shown. The diagram includes internal components (SDP, SCP) for each provider. Arrows (1) and (2) indicate the roaming path from C to A.](f5f65bec185cd1aa9b13ff4d84f0deb5_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows three service providers represented by clouds: + +- Service provider A (Home):** Contains an SDP and an SCP. A user icon is present here. +- Service provider B:** Contains an SDP and an SCP. No user icon is present. +- Service provider C (Visited):** Contains an SDP and an SCP. A user icon is present here. + +Arrows indicate the roaming sequence: + +- Arrow (1) points from the user icon in Service provider C to the user icon in Service provider A. +- Arrow (2) points from the SDP/SCP stack in Service provider C to the SDP/SCP stack in Service provider A. + +T11100450-98 + +Diagram for Figure A.14 showing a subscriber roaming from Service provider C (visited) back to Service provider A (home). Service provider B is also shown. The diagram includes internal components (SDP, SCP) for each provider. Arrows (1) and (2) indicate the roaming path from C to A. + +**Figure A.14/Q.1229 – Subscriber roams from visited to home service provider** + +Service provider A detects the presence of the roaming user and determines the user's unique identity and home service provider. + +SCP A then modifies the subscriber's profile to indicate it as not belonging to a shadowing agreement. SDP A subsequently detects the change in its master information and deletes the copy of the subscriber's profile on SDP C. + +Figure A.15 shows the case where directory operations are all sent in the same PDU and does not include message sequences for errors or for unbinding. + +![Sequence diagram showing message exchanges between a Roaming user, SCP A, SDP A, and SDP C. The sequence starts with the user being detected by SCP A. SCP A sends Bind Request and Modify Request to SDP A. SDP A responds with Bind Response and Modify Response. SDP A then sends Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request, and Request to SDP C. SDP C responds with Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, and Update Response. The final state is the user profile being deleted from SDP C.](0eb348bf17d67bf96326e07011d1c1ad_img.jpg) + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant User as Roaming user + participant SCP_A as SCP A + participant SDP_A as SDP A + participant SDP_C as SDP C + + Note left of SCP_A: Roaming user detected and authenticated by service provider A + SCP_A->>SDP_A: Bind Request, Modify Request + SDP_A-->>SCP_A: Bind Response, Modify Response + Note left of SDP_C: User profile deleted from service provider C + SDP_A->>SDP_C: Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request, Request + SDP_C-->>SDP_A: Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, Update Response + Note right of SDP_C: T11100460-98 +``` + +Sequence diagram showing message exchanges between a Roaming user, SCP A, SDP A, and SDP C. The sequence starts with the user being detected by SCP A. SCP A sends Bind Request and Modify Request to SDP A. SDP A responds with Bind Response and Modify Response. SDP A then sends Shadow Bind Request, Coordinate Update Request, and Request to SDP C. SDP C responds with Bind Response, Coordinate Update Response, and Update Response. The final state is the user profile being deleted from SDP C. + +Figure A.15/Q.1229 – Visited to home message sequence chart + +### A.5.3 Assumptions + +The assumptions made for this example scenario are summarized as follows: + +- 1) A service provider must have some means of detecting the presence of a new roaming user. +- 2) A visited service provider must have some way to determine a roaming user's unique identity and home service provider. +- 3) The data structure (DIT) is understood between cooperating SDP pairs such that a distinguished name can be derived from knowledge of a user's unique identity and home service provider. +- 4) A roaming user's profile contains information which indicates whether it should be shadowed according to a particular shadowing agreement, if applicable. + +### A.5.4 Object modelling + +This subclause describes the object modeling that could be used for Inter-Network Service Profile Transfer (ISPT). + +#### A.5.4.1 Assumptions + +##### A.5.4.1.1 Disclosure of profile entries + +It is not desirable to require that the entire list of subscriber entries for a service provider be made available to the other service providers. Only the profiles of roaming users should be disclosed. + +**A.5.4.2 DIT schema** +**A.5.4.2.1 X.500 DIT** + +The X.500 DIT shown in Figure A.16 illustrates a sample directory tree. The tree is structured according to the components of the global E.164 numbering plan. In Figure A.16, the entries under the node **inDigit = 1** represent components of North American Numbering Plan telephone numbers. Other subtrees may be structured according to other additional numbering plans, as required. It would be desirable to place the IN services tree in a position in the global directory that reflects its intention for international use. For this example, it is located under the following node in the tree: + +![Figure A.16/Q.1229 – IN Services Global Directory](56887eb4a851f556d1b263bf90755686_img.jpg) + +**o=IN Services, cn=mobility** + +``` + + graph TD + root["root +o: organizationName +cn: commonName"] --> oIN["o=IN Services"] + oIN --> cnOther["cn="] + oIN --> cnmobility["cn=mobility"] + cnmobility --> inDigit1["inDigit=1"] + cnmobility --> inDigitOther["inDigit="] + inDigit1 --> inDigit4["inDigit=4"] + inDigit4 --> inDigit1_2["inDigit=1"] + inDigit1_2 --> inDigit6["inDigit=6"] + inDigit6 --> inDigit7["inDigit=7"] + inDigit7 --> inDigit6_2["inDigit=6"] + inDigit6_2 --> inDigit3["inDigit=3"] + inDigit3 --> SPA["Service Provider A"] + inDigit3 --> SPB["Service Provider B"] + + inDigit1 --> inDigit6_3["inDigit=6"] + inDigit6_3 --> inDigit1_3["inDigit=1"] + inDigit1_3 --> inDigit2["inDigit=2"] + inDigit1_3 --> inDigit3_2["inDigit=3"] + inDigit2 --> inDigit5["inDigit=5"] + inDigit5 --> inDigit8["inDigit=8"] + inDigit8 --> inDigit3_3["inDigit=3"] + inDigit3_3 --> inDigit8_2["inDigit=8"] + inDigit8_2 --> inDigit5_2["inDigit=5"] + + inDigit3_2 --> inDigit7_2["inDigit=7"] + inDigit7_2 --> inDigit6_4["inDigit=6"] + inDigit6_4 --> inDigit9["inDigit=9"] + inDigit6_4 --> inDigit5_3["inDigit=5"] + inDigit5_3 --> inDigit6_5["inDigit=6"] + inDigit6_5 --> inDigit7_3["inDigit=7"] + inDigit7_3 --> inDigit8_3["inDigit=8"] + +``` + +**Figure A.16/Q.1229 – IN Services Global Directory** + +Figure A.16/Q.1229 – IN Services Global Directory + +An SCP can, given a telephone number, construct the distinguished name (DN) of an entry in the tree so that it can read the entry's attributes without requiring a search. The sample structure can be used to encompass all possible numbering plans. Leaf nodes in the tree may contain aliases which point to private directories. Use of single digits minimizes the numbering plan knowledge required by an SCP and avoids a search operation. + +It allows blocks of numbers to be easily divided between service providers. + +The directory would be distributed, and possibly shared where necessary, between those interested in cooperating to provide such a service. + +**A.5.4.3 Access control** + +Aliases may be used to hide a corporate DSA's tree structure. If a portion of the tree is shadowed to a private directory, and the proper access controls are set, the private directory administrator can add leaf entries to the shadowed data. These leaf entries could then be shadowed back to the shared directory. The private directory, not the shared directory, would hold the leaf entry's directory name. For dereferenced aliases, the **denyReturnDN** permission should be used to prevent disclosure of the target X.500 DN to the query originator. Only an alias name should be returned in the search result. + +160 Recommendation Q.1229 (03/99) + +To discourage repeated read operations from unauthorized users (trolling the directory), use of protected passwords or stronger authentication may be required. To prohibit access to entries without explicitly providing the name of an entry, **denyBrowse** should be enforced for all anonymous users. + +#### A.5.4.4 Reducing message flow + +When a user roams to another service provider, the visited service provider must modify the roaming user's profile on the user's home service provider directory. This will cause the user's profile to be transferred to the visited service provider's directory, as described the previous subclause. + +In order to modify the user's profile, the visited service provider must determine the roaming user's directory name. A roaming user's telephone number can be used to derive the user's directory name in the tree. + +#### A.5.4.5 Object classes + +##### A.5.4.5.1 inMobilityUserProfile + +The inMobilityUserProfile object class has been defined for storing profile information. The following ASN.1 definition may be used a starting point for describing the inMobilityUserProfile object class: + +``` +inMobilityUserProfile OBJECT-CLASS ::= { + KIND auxiliary + SUBCLASS OF {top} + MUST CONTAIN {inMobilityPIN |} + MAY CONTAIN { } + ID Id-oc-inMobilityUserProfile} +``` + +##### A.5.4.5.2 inNode + +The inNode object class has been defined for defining entries in the tree. The following ASN.1 definition may be used a starting point for describing the inNode object class: + +``` +inNode OBJECT-CLASS ::= { + SUBCLASS OF {top} + MUST CONTAIN {inDigit} + ID Id-oc-inNode} +``` + +The inDigit attribute is the distinguished attribute. + +#### A.5.4.6 Attribute types + +##### A.5.4.6.1 inDigit + +This attribute is used name entries in the IN services tree. + +The ASN.1 definition for inDigit is as follows: + +``` +inDigit ATTRIBUTE ::= { + WITH SYNTAX Digits (SIZE(1)) + EQUALITY MATCHING RULE numericStringMatch + ID id-at-inDigit} +``` + +##### A.5.4.6.2 inMobilityPIN + +This attribute is used to store a mobility user's PIN number. + +``` +inMobilityPIN ATTRIBUTE::= { + WITH SYNTAX userPassword (SIZE lbinMobilityPIN..ubinMobilityPIN) + ID id-at-inMobilityPIN} +``` + +#### A.5.4.7 DIT structure definition + +##### A.5.4.7.1 Name forms + +A name form specifies the attribute that is to be used as the RDN for a specified object class. + +##### A.5.4.7.2 inMobilityUserProfileNameForm + +The following name form definition states that inMobilityID is the permitted distinguished attribute for the object class inMobilityUserProfile. + +``` +InNodeNameForm NAME-FORM::= { + NAMES inMobilityUserProfile + WITH ATTRIBUTES inDigit + ID id-nf-inNodeNameForm} +``` + +##### A.5.4.7.3 Structure rules + +Structure rules specify permitted subordinate and superior entries in a DIT. The following structure rules which are illustrated in Figure A.17, can be used as a basis for defining the structure rules required for mobility service: + +``` +sr1 STRUCTURE-RULE::= { + NAME-FORM countryNameForm + ID 1} +sr2 STRUCTURE-RULE::= { + NAME-FORM orgNameForm + SUPERIOR RULES sr1 + ID 2} +sr2 STRUCTURE-RULE::= { + NAME-FORM personNameForm + SUPERIOR RULES sr2 + ID 3} +sr2 STRUCTURE-RULE::= { + NAME-FORM inNodeNameForm + SUPERIOR RULES sr3 + ID 4} +sr2 STRUCTURE-RULE::= { + NAME-FORM inNodeNameForm + SUPERIOR RULES sr4 + ID 5} +``` + +![A hierarchical diagram showing structure rules. At the top is an oval labeled 'root' with 'sr1' to its right. Below it is an oval labeled 'Country' with 'sr2' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'Organization' with 'sr3' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'commonName' with 'sr4' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'inDigit' with 'sr5' to its right. At the bottom of the hierarchy is an empty oval. All ovals are connected by vertical lines. The diagram is enclosed in a rectangular box. Below the box is the text 'T11100480-98'.](6762c05f927b2b9c2404c465ef0a8d01_img.jpg) + +A hierarchical diagram showing structure rules. At the top is an oval labeled 'root' with 'sr1' to its right. Below it is an oval labeled 'Country' with 'sr2' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'Organization' with 'sr3' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'commonName' with 'sr4' to its right. Below that is an oval labeled 'inDigit' with 'sr5' to its right. At the bottom of the hierarchy is an empty oval. All ovals are connected by vertical lines. The diagram is enclosed in a rectangular box. Below the box is the text 'T11100480-98'. + +**Figure A.17/Q.1229 – Structure rules** + +##### A.5.4.7.4 Object identifier assignments + +The following object identifier assignments can be used as a starting point for identifying Mobility objects in Recommendation X.500. + +| | | +|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| +| id-at-inDigit | OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-at-inMobility 0} | +| id-at-inMobilityPIN | OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-at-inMobility 1} | +| id-oc-inNode | OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-oc-inMobility 0} | +| id-nf-inNodeNameForm | OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-nf-inMobility 0} | + +# APPENDIX I + +## Service scenario examples for "Timed Disconnect" service features + +### I.1 Timed disconnect with announcement + +**Timed disconnect with announcement** is a feature allowing the user to receive a tone or announcement that he/she will be disconnected after a certain period, and is subsequently disconnected after that period. + +In the service example scenarios given, the SSF will initiate the start of a timer and play an announcement or a tone. Upon expiry of the timer, user interaction is ended and the SSF will release the call. The service scenarios uses the capability of performing user interaction in monitoring state (see Note). + +The featureTimed Disconnect with tone/announcement playing to the user may, e.g. be used together with the Call Disposition service feature, which provides the means to verify that the holders of a telecommunication card has enough spare credit (e.g. the card usage value has not been exceeded) to give permission to make the call. It implies that the usage of the card against the credit limit is tracked. This allows the support of services like Debit Cards, where charging may be controlled by the SCF identifying that the user has only few minutes left on his card. + +NOTE – The user interaction capability in monitoring state as shown in the service scenario examples will be in detail specified in IN CS-3 time frame. + +### I.2 Timed Disconnect with tone or announcement sending, SSF controlled release + +In this example the SCF requests a Timed Disconnect with announcement or tone playing, whereby the SCF-SSF relationship is terminated. The SSF initiates announcement or tone sending to the user for a certain time period (i.e. time to release) and upon timer expiry SSF releases the call, i.e. SSF controlled release. + +In this service scenario example a short warning tone/announcement is played repeatedly for a certain period (e.g. 2 minutes). When the announcement is ended after this certain period ("time to release") the ReleaseCall operation, which was buffered in the SSF during the user interaction, is executed and the call is released. + +![Diagram showing four Call Value State (CVS) boxes: CVS1: 'Originating Setup' (Joined, Pending), CVS2: 'Stable 2-Party' (Joined), CVS3: 'Stable 2-Party' SRF connected to leg (Joined), and CVS0: 'Null' (Joined). Each box shows internal components like 'c1', 'p2', 'O-BCSM', and 'SRF'.](126e772862105e7d64e4ef3f85a16840_img.jpg) + +T11100490-98 + +Diagram showing four Call Value State (CVS) boxes: CVS1: 'Originating Setup' (Joined, Pending), CVS2: 'Stable 2-Party' (Joined), CVS3: 'Stable 2-Party' SRF connected to leg (Joined), and CVS0: 'Null' (Joined). Each box shows internal components like 'c1', 'p2', 'O-BCSM', and 'SRF'. + +![Sequence diagram for Timed Disconnect with SSF controlled release. It shows interactions between SRF, SSF, and SCF across various Call Value States (CVS1, CVS2, CVS3, CVS0).](f21295f56ab9da5a7ea269beb8cf4afe_img.jpg) + +T11100500-98 + +Sequence diagram for Timed Disconnect with SSF controlled release. It shows interactions between SRF, SSF, and SCF across various Call Value States (CVS1, CVS2, CVS3, CVS0). + +### I.3 Timed Disconnect with tone or announcement sending, SCF controlled release + +In this example a variant of the first service scenario is given; in this case a persistent control relationship between SCF and SSF is maintained until call release. The SCF is to receive a notification of timer expiry ("time to release") in order to request the call to be released, i.e. SCF controlled release. This alternative would allow the user to avoid that the call be cleared by entering a password, or by entering another prepaid card number. + +This information could for example be passed by the user via OCCRUI or due to "Mid-Call" event (EDP-R) processing allowing the user to interrupt call processing and notify the SCF of this event . The SCF could then via user interaction (e.g. announcement sending and DTMF reception) collect the necessary information from the user. + +In this service scenario example a short warning tone/announcement is played repeatedly for a specified period (e.g. 2 minutes). When the announcement is ended a SpecializedResourceReport shall be sent to the SCF and the SCF may respond with ReleaseCall. This would also allow the user to avoid that the call be cleared by entering a password (e.g. MidCall events and USI can be reported). + +![Diagram showing three call state diagrams (CVS2, CVS3, CVS0) with ports c1, p2, and internal components like O-BCSM and SRF.](9d0d314eecc9c87cee25c0336bfe5dbf_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows three call state diagrams (CVS) representing different call states: + +- CVS2: "Stable 2-Party"**: A rounded rectangle containing two ports, c1 and p2, connected by a line. Inside the rectangle, there is a circle labeled '1' and a box labeled 'O-BCSM'. The word 'Joined' appears to the left of c1 and to the right of p2. +- CVS3: "Stable 2-Party" SRF connected to leg**: Similar to CVS2, but the connection between c1 and p2 is dashed, and an 'SRF' box is connected to c1. The word 'Joined' appears to the left of c1 and to the right of p2. +- CVS0: "Null"**: A rounded rectangle containing a single circle in the center. The word 'Joined' appears to the right of the rectangle. + +T11100530-98 + +Diagram showing three call state diagrams (CVS2, CVS3, CVS0) with ports c1, p2, and internal components like O-BCSM and SRF. + +![Sequence diagram showing interactions between SRF, SSF, and SCF for call management, including messages like ACR, CTR, PA, PlayAnnouncement, SRR, and REL.](dfd09f348b50c9255f3cfe67985db9bc_img.jpg) + +The sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between SRF, SSF, and SCF for call management: + +- ACR**: SSF sends ACR to SCF. +- CTR, PA**: SCF sends CTR, PA to SSF. +- PlayAnnouncement**: SSF sends PlayAnnouncement to SRF. +- disc from IP**: SRF sends a dashed message 'disc from IP' to SSF. +- SRR**: SSF sends SRR to SCF. +- REL**: SCF sends REL to SSF. + +Annotations on the right side of the diagram: + +- Timed Disconnect**: SCF controlled release +- ApplyChargingReport (Limit almost reached)**: Sent from SCF to SSF. +- During monitoring state tone, announcement or display information is sent only toward A-party, while maintaining the speech connection to B-party. PlayAnnouncement (leg1,messageID, duration=160 s, interval=20 s, disconnectfromIP)**: Sent from SSF to SRF. +- SpecializedResourceReport (time duration expired) reported Charge limit reached for this call. SRF released**: Sent from SSF to SCF. +- ReleaseCall is sent to tear down the call**: Sent from SCF to SSF. + +T11100540-98 + +Sequence diagram showing interactions between SRF, SSF, and SCF for call management, including messages like ACR, CTR, PA, PlayAnnouncement, SRR, and REL. + +# APPENDIX II + +## Detailed SCCP Called and Calling address information + +Applying the constraints from Annex B/Q.713 to the addresses in 7.2.3.9.3.3 gives the following formats for the elements in Table 7-25: + +| | | | | | +|------------------|-------------------|---|------------------------------|-----------------| +| IF 2.1 | adrS(inap[FE-F1]) | = | adrS(ssn(X), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 4, 6] | +| IF 2.2 | adrP(inap[FE-F2]) | = | adrP(rgt, ssn(X), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 4, 6] | +| IF 2.3 | adrP(inap[FE-F3]) | = | adrP(rgt, ssn(0), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 3, 6] | +| IF 2.4, | adrP(inap[FE-F4]) | = | adrP(rpc, ssn(Y), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 2, 5] | +| IF 2.5 | adrS(inap[FE-F4]) | = | adrS(ssn(Y), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 2, 5] | +| IF 5.1 | adrS(inap[FE-F]) | = | adrS(rgt, ssn(0), gt(FE-F) ) | [Notes 1, 3, 6] | +| IF 2.1, 2.5, 5.1 | adrS(inap[FE-A]) | = | adrS(ssn(0), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 3, 6] | +| IF 2.2-4 | adrP(inap[FE-A]) | = | adrP(rgt, ssn(0), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 3, 6] | +| IF 5.2 | adrP(inap[FE-A2]) | = | adrP(rgt, ssn(Y), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 5, 6] | +| IF 5.3 | adrP(inap[FE-A3]) | = | adrP(rgt, ssn(0), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 3, 6] | +| IF 5.4 | adrP(inap[FE-A4]) | = | adrP(rpc, ssn(X), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 2, 4] | +| IF 5.5 | adrS(inap[FE-A4]) | = | adrS(ssn(X), gt(FE-A) ) | [Notes 1, 2, 4] | + +NOTE 1 – The format of the global title field in each address is currently not standardized for INAP. Current internationally standardized formats for the GT field which are considered suitable are either that specified in B.4.3/Q.7135 or that specified in B.4.4/Q.7136. + +It is advised that SCCP protocol and network design experts be involved in decisions related to SCCP message addressing. In the case of international internetworking this is WP 5/2 SG 11 ITU-T (Q.16). + +NOTE 2 – The need for the global title field to be present in the final N-UNITDATA primitive passed to TC depends on the method chosen for INAP FE determination in 7.2.3.9.2.2. If the application context method is used, then the GT need not be present. Otherwise the GT must be present and must be the same as the GT in the original called party address in order for the destination FE to be determined. This would require that the GT value must be preserved during the GTT process. + +NOTE 3 – The choice of SSN value 0 is mandatory for international use in the absence of a standardized SSN for INAP services. + +NOTE 4 – The choice of SSN value X is a network specific matter within SCCP Network 1. + +NOTE 5 – The choice of SSN value Y is a network specific matter within SCCP Network 2. + +NOTE 6 – The value of the SSN at this point is arbitrary as it can be changed as a result of the next GTT process. + +--- + +5 This requires the GT to contain a Generic Number with a BCD Q.708 Z-UUU-V prefix. + +6 This requires the GT to contain an international E.164 number. + +![A net of a rectangular prism consisting of six rectangles arranged in a cross shape.](88c92858439684b2103e88cb143fb98e_img.jpg) + +A net of a rectangular prism (box) composed of six rectangular faces. The layout consists of a central vertical column of four rectangles and two side rectangles (flaps) attached to the second rectangle from the top. All lines are thin and dotted. + +A net of a rectangular prism consisting of six rectangles arranged in a cross shape. + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/d3ca266c298aeb34b019960c6c36f187_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/d3ca266c298aeb34b019960c6c36f187_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49c1c7a7d182572f3d3a90ef1ac7cd6fd7854b8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.14-198811-I_PDF-E/d3ca266c298aeb34b019960c6c36f187_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7a8b16b19ef140ed61b66f05222edd7f53c1f25e5309c30b8b12dbd78bcd7500 +size 95669 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/052543d8c9c0643b05b3ce45c6decca1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/052543d8c9c0643b05b3ce45c6decca1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e50a11948a7efe2a880c1606eb4509e08f923f9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/052543d8c9c0643b05b3ce45c6decca1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d216c7184de8e7fd8d3fe53173c5b486f7f8bff6935187db3bffd861f1e54d7c +size 113865 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab0a93827552a09790c58f64a25a416998862d55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:467d257efb1a413fb33c11de1cf3faec8b825c9b9cf9d5d1f8b697455ec3a762 +size 63255 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939eb6a57fac47a375526475ba6c31bf67e08b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52a289bbb49d106b16f646b5050f62e5c7cbe1bb201f8c767547c3039abbf359 +size 8245 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0007c91ab697e2e7daddd3c89fb57cbb552dd819 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:47dc1835dd90e7837745bd0ea686dc420146511d68ff0be5d6f1ab7c6e90e603 +size 41069 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51b65d63a4ef80309ed61625b76ee21c3a11cc84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:10161f18fad086918af04ed41ea973cded6bf71d664a4f8ae63e692548d6ea54 +size 30154 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d8a5eb94094e130b9921ec58f21f9601215dbc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:209f02f5267486db08b0173a9955dad008a92b4a8601f0cebc3668b9e190bc05 +size 38571 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/c78c2eefd86269d1740ab85a916f24f2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/c78c2eefd86269d1740ab85a916f24f2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41d1dd6f9ff24b6a447b72f70bb26da13e71694e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/c78c2eefd86269d1740ab85a916f24f2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f0764d651f15c76172d1f2d00d4978465c9ec91f5041c61d49a286ebb754adaa +size 33352 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/f142b022cfc716cd967297f027efe647_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/f142b022cfc716cd967297f027efe647_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1cbb02c86ef172cb4471e1fe4fd9c40db99e170f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1703-200405-I_PDF-E/f142b022cfc716cd967297f027efe647_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d53fabb0979d826098fe1b8376ae93afcfc5fbc8f0eb2b9e24ea2a7611570a6d +size 71918 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3fb248156cdb56f781afb35108c4cae5d88e42e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:015c644a3f43ffceb4a5100e484f3d7f4e3b46982e2f7a9886f9b201f2a750dd +size 63458 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f197e2ed1c780437cd74f99119d650c1d7befcd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e71985e0ececcc9769928d3000ddf481ba5a376880fb58ca1d27a7c6173d1c15 +size 120508 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/9ae17964ddd9b814c7d905b1af2fddf2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/9ae17964ddd9b814c7d905b1af2fddf2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74ad37c432807058543d6a0a5b696b25ae7af2ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/9ae17964ddd9b814c7d905b1af2fddf2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8ca0bde2b0f39c03fa7a93339b689adfb0f95bf80db4da7c96a11566fad11896 +size 69627 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4e4057cfee0d6605751d61036eae5996f0d7506 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:97ac73f2eb1d5ae6c838c08d389b6367b1b8e3559100785dda28c6160d47ee1b +size 84583 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28b4e38390f020e7c91fe6fb775d5713eff754d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6ac7c2b8f3537390084d163ba54d9389a1da530969985f0ac0bf54ba2563cb12 +size 84784 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/d3294dc879b451b369c0b06f42e9b39f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/d3294dc879b451b369c0b06f42e9b39f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89406f6b68d927d7fa355c8e39de6b64a9bca8f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/d3294dc879b451b369c0b06f42e9b39f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:00ee16f77ddc34e26a1b8dad4f1ff5e071f00d014bb20453f4e1bab8f9905133 +size 8455 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b089fad4f6e5697e353a86728daf0726e8a2ba8c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e996b14a2e533c9cadf0e8f7948ea985b5c25dcfd8e161d9eeec2aacbcffe6b7 +size 31898 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5dcb8d465eec6d37cd7c9ad8311765215670bd72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f29fa65f9790120fc0546b17735eddc366250a0c8d497ac306838803f44d6a64 +size 124273 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d611d81f5a58d4ed0699bea43dca5e1571db2070 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1706-200611-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,725 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.1706/Y.2801** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(11/2006) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Signalling requirements and protocols for IMT-2000 + +SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION +INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS +AND NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS + +Next Generation Networks – Generalized mobility + +# --- **Mobility management requirements for NGN** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.1706/Y.2801 + +![ITU logo](d3294dc879b451b369c0b06f42e9b39f_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a red lightning bolt striking across it, symbolizing global communication. To the right of the globe, the text "International Telecommunication Union" is written in a blue, sans-serif font, with "ITU" in a larger, bold font above it. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3999 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.1706/Y.2801** + +# **Mobility management requirements for NGN** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation describes the requirements for mobility management (MM) for Next Generation Networks (NGN). For this purpose, this Recommendation describes the considerations for mobility management in the NGN, classifies the types of mobility management for NGN environment, and identifies a set of the MM requirements for NGN. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.1706/Y.2801 was approved on 6 November 2006 by ITU-T Study Group 19 (2005-2008) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure. + +## **Keywords** + +Mobility management requirements, NGN, Systems beyond IMT-2000. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2007 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations..... | 2 | +| 5 Introduction ..... | 3 | +| 6 Considerations for mobility management in NGN ..... | 3 | +| 6.1 Network environments ..... | 3 | +| 6.2 General mobility management features..... | 4 | +| 6.3 Considerations on user part ..... | 6 | +| 6.4 Mobility management functionalities..... | 8 | +| 7 Classification of mobility management ..... | 9 | +| 7.1 Intra-CN MM..... | 10 | +| 7.2 Intra-Network MM (Inter-CN MM)..... | 10 | +| 8 Requirements for mobility management ..... | 10 | +| 8.1 General requirements..... | 10 | +| 8.2 Requirements for Inter-CNs MM ..... | 12 | +| 8.3 Requirements for Inter-ANs MM ..... | 13 | +| 8.4 Requirements for Intra-AN MM ..... | 13 | +| Appendix I – Classification of mobility based on network topology ..... | 15 | +| BIBLIOGRAPHY ..... | 17 | + + + +# Mobility management requirements for NGN + +# 1 Scope + +The scope of this Recommendation is to identify the requirements for Mobility Management (MM) for NGN. Note that the scope of this Recommendation is not limited to a specific level of mobility and covers full mobility. To that end, this Recommendation describes the following: + +- Considerations of MM for NGN; +- Classification of MM types for NGN; +- Requirements for MM for NGN. + +Administrations may require operators and service providers to take into account national regulatory and national policy requirements in implementing this Recommendation. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [G.992.3] ITU-T Recommendation G.992.3 (2005), *Asymmetric digital subscriber line transceivers 2 (ADSL2)*. +- [Q.1741.1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1741.1 (2002), *IMT-2000 references to release 1999 of GSM evolved UMTS core network with UTRAN access network*. +- [ITU-R M.1645] ITU-R Recommendation M.1645 (2003), *Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000*. + +# 3 Definitions + +This Recommendation uses the definitions and terms that have been defined in the relevant ITU-T Recommendations such as [Q.Sup52]. + +In addition, this Recommendation defines the following terms: + +- 3.1 home network:** The network to which a mobile user is normally connected, or the service provider with which the mobile user is associated, and where the user's subscription information is managed. +- 3.2 mobility:** The ability for the user or other mobile entities to communicate and access services irrespective of changes of the location or technical environment. +- 3.3 mobility management:** The set of functions used to provide mobility. These functions include authentication, authorization, location updating, paging, download of user information and more. +- 3.4 open interface:** An interface that uses open standards. + +**3.5 open standard:** Open Standards are standards made available to the general public and are developed (or approved) and maintained via a collaborative and consensus-driven process. + +**3.6 roaming:** [Q.1741.1] The ability for a user to function in a serving network different from the home network. + +NOTE – This is the ability of the users to access services according to their user profile while moving outside of their subscribed home network, i.e., by using an access point of a visited network. This requires the ability of the user to get access to the visited network, the existence of an interface between home network and visited network, as well as a roaming agreement between the respective network operators. + +**3.7 seamless service:** A service that is implemented such that it will ensure that users will not experience any service disruptions while changing the point of attachment. + +**3.8 visited network:** The network outside a home network that provides service to a mobile user. This term is more business significant than geographically significant. + +**3.9 xDSL:** [G.992.3] Any of the various types of digital subscriber lines technologies. + +# 4 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|--------|-------------------------------------------------| +| 2G | Second Generation | +| 3G | Third Generation | +| AAA | Authentication, Authorization and Accounting | +| AN | Access Network | +| CN | Core Network | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| IPv4 | Internet Protocol Version 4 | +| IPv6 | Internet Protocol Version 6 | +| MM | Mobility Management | +| MMR | Mobility Management Requirements | +| MT | Mobile Terminal | +| NAP | Network Access Point | +| NGN | Next Generation Network | +| NNI | Network-to-Network Interface | +| NT | Network Termination | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| SAP | Service Access Point | +| SDO | Standards Development Organization | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | +| SLA | Service Level Agreement | +| SP | Service Platform | +| SPI | Service Platform Interface | +| TCP/IP | Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol | + +| | | +|------|-----------------------------| +| URL | Uniform Resource Locator | +| VoIP | Voice over IP | +| WLAN | Wireless Local Area Network | +| xDSL | x Digital Subscriber Line | + +# 5 Introduction + +This Recommendation describes the requirements for mobility management (MMR) in NGN. This work has been motivated from the observation that the NGN continues to evolve toward the convergence of fixed networks and wireless mobile networks, and thus there is a crucial need to identify the requirements for mobility management to provide mobility for the users and services in the NGN environment. + +The rationale behind NGN is the convergence of fixed and wireless networks and ultimately migration to interoperable and harmonized network architectures. This trend has caused an industry need to provide seamless services transparently to the users across different access network (AN) arrangements. This Recommendation therefore asks: "What requirements for mobility management should be considered to support the seamless services in NGN networks?" + +This Recommendation identifies the considerations and requirements for mobility management for NGN. + +Mobility management is an essential requirement for NGN users to communicate anytime and from anywhere. This could be facilitated through the use of various wireline or wireless access technologies to enable users to communicate over heterogeneous network environments. + +In particular, with the massive growth in the number of users and the continuing deployment of heterogeneous systems, the demand to provide seamless services to the NGN users gets stronger with time, and such pursuits present new challenges and requirements for new types of MM that could provide seamless services across heterogeneous networks. + +A promising solution for the new type of MM in NGN should take into account the long-term trends for future networks, the need for a smooth evolution of the infrastructure, and also the issue of backward compatibility with existing networks. + +In this respect, this Recommendation will identify a set of requirements for mobility management in the emerging NGN. Clause 6 describes the considerations for mobility management for NGN, together with the general features and functionalities associated with MM for NGN. Clause 7 classifies the types of mobility management to be addressed and for which seamless services must be provided in the NGN environment. Finally, a set of NGN MM requirements are identified and characterized in Clause 8. + +# 6 Considerations for mobility management in NGN + +This clause describes the generic features and considerations associated with mobility management so as to facilitate the identification of MM requirements and protocols for NGN. + +## 6.1 Network environments + +In the NGN, it is expected that a variety of the existing and new wired/wireless access network technologies are supported, such as WLAN, xDSL and 2G/3G mobile networks etc., as shown in Figure 6-1. Each of the access networks is connected to the NGN core network (CN), to provide the same set of services for users, preferably independently of the access network type. + +![Diagram of the envisioned network environment of NGN. At the center is a green oval labeled 'NGN core'. Above it, a yellow cloud labeled 'Services and applications' is connected via a red double-headed arrow. Surrounding the core are several colored ovals representing different access technologies: 'Digital broadcast' (yellow), 'Cellular 2G' (orange), 'IMT-2000' (light yellow), 'Short range connectivity' (light blue), 'WLAN type' (light green), and 'Wireline xDSL' (light blue). Each access technology is connected to the NGN core and has icons representing user equipment (laptops, mobile phones, desktops, a fax machine) connected to it. 'Digital broadcast' has a 'Download channel' and a 'Return channel e.g. cellular'. 'Short range connectivity' is connected to 'Other entities'. A label 'Q.1706-Y.2801(06)_F6.1' is in the bottom right corner.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +Diagram of the envisioned network environment of NGN. At the center is a green oval labeled 'NGN core'. Above it, a yellow cloud labeled 'Services and applications' is connected via a red double-headed arrow. Surrounding the core are several colored ovals representing different access technologies: 'Digital broadcast' (yellow), 'Cellular 2G' (orange), 'IMT-2000' (light yellow), 'Short range connectivity' (light blue), 'WLAN type' (light green), and 'Wireline xDSL' (light blue). Each access technology is connected to the NGN core and has icons representing user equipment (laptops, mobile phones, desktops, a fax machine) connected to it. 'Digital broadcast' has a 'Download channel' and a 'Return channel e.g. cellular'. 'Short range connectivity' is connected to 'Other entities'. A label 'Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F6.1' is in the bottom right corner. + +Figure 6-1/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Envisioned network environment of NGN + +## 6.2 General mobility management features + +Mobility has been used a little differently according to its application areas. However, the general feature of the mobility could be described as follows: + +### 6.2.1 Moving object + +Mobility management can be classified as follows according to what moves: + +#### - *Terminal mobility* + +This is the mobility for those scenarios where the same terminal equipment is moving or is used at different locations. The ability of a terminal to access telecommunication services from different locations and while in motion, and the capability of the network to identify and locate that terminal. + +#### - *Network mobility* + +The ability of a network, where a set of fixed or mobile nodes are networked to each other, to change, as a unit, its point of attachment to the corresponding network upon the network's movement itself. + +#### - *Personal mobility* + +This is the mobility for those scenarios where the user changes the terminal used for network access at different locations. The ability of a user to access telecommunication services at any terminal on the basis of a personal identifier, and the capability of the network to provide those services delineated in the user's service profile. + +#### - *Service mobility* + +This is the mobility, applied for a specific service, i.e., the ability of a moving object to use the particular (subscribed) service irrespective of the location of the user and the terminal that is used for that purpose. Note that this service mobility is different from the *service level mobility* which is defined in ITU-T Rec. Y.2012, *Functional requirements and architecture of the NGN*, and related Recommendations. + +### 6.2.2 Features by service continuity + +Mobility also could be classified as shown in Figure 6-2 according to service continuity. + +![A hierarchical diagram showing Mobility classifications. The root node is 'Mobility', which branches into 'Service continuity' and 'Service discontinuity'. 'Service continuity' further branches into 'Seamless handover' and 'Handover'. 'Service discontinuity' further branches into 'Nomadicity' and 'Portability'. A small note 'Q.1706-Y.2801(06)_F6.2' is at the bottom right.](e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg) + +``` +graph TD; Mobility[Mobility] --> SC[Service continuity]; Mobility --> SD[Service discontinuity]; SC --> SH[Seamless handover]; SC --> H[Handover]; SD --> N[Nomadicity]; SD --> P[Portability]; +``` + +Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F6.2 + +A hierarchical diagram showing Mobility classifications. The root node is 'Mobility', which branches into 'Service continuity' and 'Service discontinuity'. 'Service continuity' further branches into 'Seamless handover' and 'Handover'. 'Service discontinuity' further branches into 'Nomadicity' and 'Portability'. A small note 'Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F6.2' is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 6-2/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Mobility classifications according to service quality** + +#### - *Service continuity* + +The ability for a moving object to maintain ongoing service over including current states, such as user's network environment and session for a service. This category includes Seamless Handover and Handover. + +- Seamless handover: It is a special case of mobility with service continuity since it preserves the ability to provide services without any impact on their service level agreements to a moving object during and after movement. +- Handover: The ability to provide services with some impact on their service level agreements to a moving object during and after movement. + +#### - *Service discontinuity* + +The ability to provide services irrespective of environment changes of a moving object, but not to be able to maintain ongoing service. This category includes Nomadism and Portability. + +- Nomadism: Ability of the users to change their network access point on moving. When changing the network access point, the user's service session is completely stopped and then started again, i.e., there is no service continuity or hand-over used. It is assumed that normal usage pattern is that users shut down their service session before attaching to a different access point. + +NOTE – This term is also intended to cover the situation where the network access point is changed as a result of use of a different network interface card as discussed in 6.3.1. + +- Portability: Ability of a user identifier or address to be allocated to different systems when the user moves from one location to another. + +### 6.2.3 Mobility layer + +The layer concept specified in [ITU-R M.1645] is used to classify mobility management. + +#### - *Horizontal mobility* + +Mobility on the same layer as defined in [ITU-R M.1645]. Generally, it is referred to as the mobility within the same access technology. + +#### - *Vertical mobility* + +Mobility between different layers as defined in [ITU-R M.1645]. Generally, it is referred to as the mobility between different access technologies. + +## 6.3 Considerations on user part + +NGN needs to consider more general types of user parts, i.e., user network, as well as simple forms like user terminals as depicted in Figure 6-3 below. It shows a user network with multiple Service Platforms and each Service Platform may run multiple Service Applications. In such user networks, multiple users may associate themselves with one or more service applications, by providing one of their user identifiers to the application. For example, this might typically be a SIP URL. The service application is bound to a TCP/IP socket of the Service Platform Interface. The SPI binds itself to an access network-specific Network Termination via the user's connectivity network. Finally, the network termination is bound to the Network Attachment Point of the access network. + +![Diagram of User network configuration showing multiple users connected to service platforms, which are connected to a user connectivity network, then to a network termination, and finally to an access network.](042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the user network configuration. At the top, four 'User' circles are shown, two on the left and two on the right. Each pair of users is connected to a 'Service platform' box. Inside each service platform box, there are two 'SAP' (Service Application) boxes and one 'SPI' (Service Platform Interface) box. The 'SAP' boxes are connected to the 'SPI' box. The 'SPI' boxes are connected to a central 'User connectivity network' oval. Below this oval is an 'NT' (Network Termination) box. The 'NT' box is connected to a 'Network attachment point' on the 'Access network' oval at the bottom. Labels include 'User', 'SAP', 'SPI', 'Service platform', 'Service application', 'Service platform interface', 'User connectivity network', 'NT', 'Network termination', 'Network attachment point', and 'Access network'. A small text 'Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F6.3' is in the bottom right corner of the diagram area. + +Diagram of User network configuration showing multiple users connected to service platforms, which are connected to a user connectivity network, then to a network termination, and finally to an access network. + +**Figure 6-3/Q.1706/Y.2801 – User network configuration** + +Only one Network Termination is shown in the user network, but multi-homing may be considered. + +In this user network scenario there is a many-to-one relation between the different types of endpoints. A mobile terminal may represent a limit case where there is a one-to-one relation between the user and the service application, the service application and the service platform interface, and between the service platform interface and the network termination. + +### 6.3.1 Mobility scenarios according to changes of endpoints + +Figure 6-4 shows a number of mobility scenarios including some that involve mobility within the end user equipment area. + +![Diagram illustrating seven mobility scenarios (1-7) showing changes in endpoint associations between User (U), Service Platform (SP), Network Termination (NT), and Network Attachment Point (NAP) within an Access network (any type), connected to a Core transport network and Service function domains A and B.](eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates seven mobility scenarios, numbered 1 through 7, showing different ways endpoints can change their associations. Each scenario involves a User (U), a Service Platform (SP), a Network Termination (NT), and a Network Attachment Point (NAP) within an 'Access network (any type)'. All access networks are connected to a central 'Core transport network', which in turn connects to two 'Service function domain' boxes, labeled A and B. + +- Scenario (1):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different Service Platforms (SP) within the same user network. +- Scenario (2):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different user networks. +- Scenario (3):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different Service Platforms (SP) within the same user network. +- Scenario (4):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different user networks. +- Scenario (5):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different NAPs on the same access network. +- Scenario (6):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different NAPs on different access networks. +- Scenario (7):** Shows a User (U) connected to a Service Platform (SP), which is connected to a Network Termination (NT), which is connected to a NAP. Arrows indicate mobility between two different Service Platforms (SP) within the same user network, where the SP itself supports mobility. + +Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F6.4 + +Diagram illustrating seven mobility scenarios (1-7) showing changes in endpoint associations between User (U), Service Platform (SP), Network Termination (NT), and Network Attachment Point (NAP) within an Access network (any type), connected to a Core transport network and Service function domains A and B. + +Figure 6-4/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Mobility scenarios according to the changes of endpoint + +The arrows show mobility taking place as described in the following paragraphs. Each mobility scenario is numbered to the left of the figure. + +A user may only change the association with a Service Application when they move from one Service Platform to another, either within a user network (1) or when they move from one user network to another (2). All other bindings remain fixed in this case. + +The user may also move their Service Platform, thereby changing the binding between the Service Platform Interface and his Network Termination. Again this may be done within a user network (3) or when moving from one user network to another (4). The binding between the Network Termination and the Network Attachment Point does not change in these two scenarios. + +If the Network Termination supports mobility, the user may change the binding between the Network Termination and its Network Attachment Point. The change may be to another NAP on the same access network (5) or on another access network (6). The other bindings do not change in these scenarios. + +Finally, a more complex scenario is shown in (7) where the SPI supports mobility. Such a SPI could be used to bind to either a NT in a user network or act as an NT to bind to a NAP. + +Figure 6-5 further illustrates the option to gain access to different Service Providers from different Service Platforms (or different Service Applications on the same Service Platform) in the same user network. + +![Diagram illustrating a single Network Termination (NT) connected to multiple Access Networks (ANs) via Network Access Points (NAPs). The diagram shows four scenarios: (1-1) three users (U) connected to three service platforms (SP) which are connected to a single NT; (3-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN; (4-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN; and (4-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN. All NAPs are connected to a central Core transport network.](b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a network architecture where a single Network Termination (NT) can be connected to multiple Access Networks (ANs) via Network Access Points (NAPs). The diagram is divided into four sections, each representing a different scenario: + +- (1-1)**: Three users (U) are connected to three Service Platforms (SP). These SPs are connected to a single NT. The NT is connected to an NAP, which is connected to an AN (any type). The AN is connected to a Core transport network. +- (3-1)**: Two users (U) are connected to two SPs. These SPs are connected to an NT. The NT is connected to an NAP, which is connected to an AN (any type). The AN is connected to a Core transport network. +- (4-1)**: Two users (U) are connected to two SPs. These SPs are connected to an NT. The NT is connected to an NAP, which is connected to an AN (any type). The AN is connected to a Core transport network. +- (4-1)**: Two users (U) are connected to two SPs. These SPs are connected to an NT. The NT is connected to an NAP, which is connected to an AN (any type). The AN is connected to a Core transport network. + +The diagram shows that the NT can be connected to multiple ANs, and the users can access different SPs through the same NT. The Core transport network is a central component that connects all the ANs. + +Diagram illustrating a single Network Termination (NT) connected to multiple Access Networks (ANs) via Network Access Points (NAPs). The diagram shows four scenarios: (1-1) three users (U) connected to three service platforms (SP) which are connected to a single NT; (3-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN; (4-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN; and (4-1) two users (U) connected to two SPs, which are connected to an NT, which is connected to an NAP and an AN. All NAPs are connected to a central Core transport network. + +**Figure 6-5/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Single NT with multiple ANs** + +A user uses the same service application and the same network termination but changes his network interface card within the same terminal, which has two or more network interface cards of Service Platform (1-1). In this case, the user uses the same Network Termination (NT) but can change its access network, which is matched with the network interface card. + +A user can move his service platform, thereby changing the binding between the Service Platform Interface and his Network Termination. Changing the binding between the Service Platform Interface and his Network Termination is done within a user network and between two access networks (3-1) as well as between two user networks and between two access networks (4-1). These scenarios can occur for improving network performance, and so on. + +## 6.4 Mobility management functionalities + +MM in NGN will be realized by using basic mobility-related functionalities plus associated functionalities. The basic functionalities are concerned directly with mobility management for mobile users and terminals, whereas the associated functionalities are used for supporting MM or for exchanging related information for overall control and management purposes. + +The basic MM functionalities include location and handover management. + +### 6.4.1 Location management + +Location management is performed to identify the current network location of a Mobile Terminal (MT) and to keep track of it as it moves. Location management is used for the control of calls and sessions terminated at the MT. Location information is given to the call or session manager for + +establishing a session. With the help of location management, the correspondent node is able to locate the MT and establish a session via appropriate signalling. + +Location management consists of two basic functions: location registration and call delivery/paging. The location registration is the procedure to register the current location when MTs change the attachment point to the network. Call delivery is to deliver packets to the destined MTs and paging is used to search the MTs in dormant mode. + +### 6.4.2 Handover management + +Handover management is used to provide MTs with session continuity whenever they move into different network regions and change their point of attachment to the network during a session. The main objective of seamless handover is to minimize service disruption due to data loss and delay during the handover. Most MM protocols perform handover management together with an appropriate location management scheme. According to the handover areas concerned, the handover types can be classified into "handover within an AN", where the MT moves within a region covered by the same AN in NGN, and "handover between different ANs or CNs", where the MT changes its concerned access system for ongoing sessions. + +# 7 Classification of mobility management + +Note that various types of mobility exist in NGN environments. Mobility management requirements also are different according to mobility types. This Recommendation only considers the classifications illustrated in Figure 7-1. In Figure 7-1, the MM issues for NGN are classified into Intra-Network MM and Inter-Network MM. Intra-Network MM is further subdivided into Intra-AN MM and Inter-AN MM. + +![Diagram illustrating the classification of Mobility Management (MM) in NGN environments. It shows three core networks (CN1, CN2, CN3) and their associated access networks (ANs). Red arrows (1) represent Inter-CN MM between CN1 and CN2, and between CN2 and CN3. Blue dashed arrows (2a) represent Inter-AN MM between same type of ANs (e.g., AN1 in CN1 to AN1 in CN2, or AN2 in CN2 to AN2 in CN3). Blue dashed arrows (2b) represent Inter-AN MM between different types of ANs (e.g., AN3 in CN2 to AN3 in CN3, or AN2 in CN2 to AN3 in CN3). Green dashed arrows (3) represent Intra-AN MM within the same AN (e.g., within AN1 in CN1 or within AN3 in CN3). A legend at the bottom left defines the arrow types and the abbreviations MM (Mobility management), AN (Access network), and CN (Core network). The diagram is labeled Q.1706-Y.2801(06)_F7.1.](9ae17964ddd9b814c7d905b1af2fddf2_img.jpg) + +1 Inter-CN MM + +2a Inter-AN MM between same type of ANs + +2b Inter-AN MM between different types of ANs + +3 Intra-AN MM + +MM Mobility management + +AN Access network + +CN Core network + +Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F7.1 + +Diagram illustrating the classification of Mobility Management (MM) in NGN environments. It shows three core networks (CN1, CN2, CN3) and their associated access networks (ANs). Red arrows (1) represent Inter-CN MM between CN1 and CN2, and between CN2 and CN3. Blue dashed arrows (2a) represent Inter-AN MM between same type of ANs (e.g., AN1 in CN1 to AN1 in CN2, or AN2 in CN2 to AN2 in CN3). Blue dashed arrows (2b) represent Inter-AN MM between different types of ANs (e.g., AN3 in CN2 to AN3 in CN3, or AN2 in CN2 to AN3 in CN3). Green dashed arrows (3) represent Intra-AN MM within the same AN (e.g., within AN1 in CN1 or within AN3 in CN3). A legend at the bottom left defines the arrow types and the abbreviations MM (Mobility management), AN (Access network), and CN (Core network). The diagram is labeled Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_F7.1. + +Figure 7-1/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Classification of MM + +## 7.1 Intra-CN MM + +"Intra-CN" MM addresses MM issues within a network. It can be subdivided into "Intra-AN" MM and "Inter-AN" MM. + +### - *Intra-AN MM* + +"Intra-AN" MM addresses MM issues within an AN. In Figure 7-1, for example, MM within AN1 of CN1 can be classified as Intra-AN MM, marked as '3' in the figure. + +### - *Inter-AN MM* + +"Inter-AN" MM addresses MM issues between different ANs within the CN. Inter-AN MM can be further classified into the following two sub-types: + +- 1) MM between the same type of ANs (e.g., MM between two AN1s within the CN1, marked as 2a in Figure 7-1); and +- 2) MM between different types of ANs (e.g., MM between AN1 and AN3 within CN1, marked as 2b in Figure 7-1). + +## 7.2 Intra-Network MM (Inter-CN MM) + +"Inter-Network" MM addresses MM issues between networks and was mainly touched in [Q.Sup52]. Inter-Network MM will always accompany the MM issues between two ANs, i.e., Inter-AN MM. In addition to those, Inter-Network MM must handle the MM issues that occur with MT handovers across different core networks (i.e., Network-to-Network Interface (NNI)), such as user authorization and Service Level Agreement (SLA) negotiation. In Figure 7-1, for example, the MM between CN1 and CN3 is Inter-Network MM, marked as '3' in the figure. + +# 8 Requirements for mobility management + +The MM requirements could be given differently according to MM types such as Inter-CNs, Inter-ANs, and Intra-AN. The main differences of MM requirements are summarized in the following table. + +| | Administration | Access technology | +|-------------|--------------------|-------------------| +| Inter-CN MM | Different | Same/Different | +| Inter-AN MM | Same a) | Same/Different | +| Intra-AN MM | Same | Same | + +a) For the case of Network Sharing, the same physical core network supports two logical CNs. + +Note that the following requirements are only minimum requirements, so better features could be provided in each MM type in practice. Also, this Recommendation mainly focuses on IP-based new ANs rather than legacy ANs which may already have their own MM solutions. + +## 8.1 General requirements + +This clause describes a set of general requirements for MM in NGN regardless of MM types. + +### 8.1.1 Harmonization with IP-based networks + +The NGN is envisaged to be IP-based. Accordingly, the MM protocols for NGN should be IP-based or, at least, well-harmonized with IP technology for its efficient and integrated operation in such future networks. It is also recommended to reuse to the extent possible the existing MM techniques/technologies for the design of the MM protocols for NGN, potentially through cooperation with external forums and SDOs. + +### **8.1.2 Separation of control and transport functions** + +The transport plane should be separated from the control plane for efficient mobility management and scalability. Such separation of control and transport planes provides the architectural flexibility that facilitates the introduction of new technologies and services. Open interfaces between the control plane functions and the transport plane functions are necessary to implement their separation. + +### **8.1.3 Provision of a location management function** + +To support the mobility of users/terminals, the location of users/terminals are tracked and maintained by one or more location management functions whenever they move. In harmony with the overall IP-based structure envisaged, location management should be based on an IP-specific approach such as the Mobile IP Home Agent or the SIP registrar. + +Location management can be expanded to provide location information to service applications. + +### **8.1.4 Provision of mechanisms for identification of users/terminals** + +The MM protocols in NGN must specify how the users/terminals are to be identified in the networks or systems for mobility management. This identification functionality will be the first step to be taken in the mobility management process and thus used for authentication, authorization and accounting of users/terminals. + +### **8.1.5 QoS support** + +The MM protocols must support QoS, which mobile users require, to support QoS-required services such as VoIP, streaming, and so on as well as convenient Internet best-effort services. However, the required level of QoS could be different according to MM types which are described in Figure 7-1. + +### **8.1.6 Interworking with established AAA and security schemes** + +The MM protocols for NGN must specify how users/terminals are to be authenticated, authorized accounted, and secured for services using standard Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) and security mechanisms. + +The result of the AAA functionality will be a yes/no decision on the service request made by a user. As a next step, the access network configuration will be adapted to the mobile/nomadic user such that it satisfies the particular Quality of Service (QoS) level and security association for the requested service. These mechanisms should be based on the user's subscription profile and the technical resource constraints of the respective access networks. + +### **8.1.7 Location privacy** + +The location information of particular users should be protected from non-permitted entities. This will entail mutual authentication, security association, and other IP security requirements between the mobile terminal and the location management function. + +### **8.1.8 Support of network mobility** + +NGN are envisioned to include moving networks as well as moving terminals. Typical example platforms for moving networks could be bus, train, ship, aeroplane and so on. The MM protocols in NGN need to efficiently support these kinds of moving networks. + +### **8.1.9 Support of ad hoc networks** + +The support for ad hoc networks is essential because this kind of network is envisioned as one of the major access technologies in NGN. + +### **8.1.10 Resource optimization** + +The provision of the scheme for resource optimization is required to save power consumption in the terminals and signalling overhead in network side. The resource optimization should be provided to the terminals in idle mode as well as in active mode. + +The support of resource optimization for idle mode terminals is mainly achieved with a paging procedure and this procedure is usually tightly coupled with location management. + +### **8.1.11 Support of IPv4/IPv6 and public/private addresses** + +Currently, IPv4 is dominant but IPv6 is being expected to be widely deployed in the near future. Accordingly, the MM protocols must support IPv6 as well as IPv4. In addition, note that users/terminals may use their private address rather than public IP addresses according to the network environment regardless of IP version. Accordingly, MM should allow for the use of private addresses. In this case, a proxy agent might be needed to support MM-related operations such as location update and paging. + +### **8.1.12 Provision of personal and service mobility** + +To realize diverse applications in NGN, personal and service mobility, which are defined in 6.2.1 as well as terminal mobility must be provided. + +### **8.1.13 User data accessibility** + +Services and other network functions require some user data in order to be appropriately customized. These can be either "user subscription data" or "network data". + +### **8.1.14 Support of several kinds of mobile endpoints** + +In the NGN environment there are different types of mobile endpoints to be considered. The mobile endpoint can be an application in SIP, interface in the Mobile IP, and so on as well as it can be in a core network, an access network, a user-premises network or a service platform. So, each network related to the mobile endpoints should be able to support the mobility of every mobile endpoint. + +### **8.1.15 Maintenance of binding information** + +There are many types of bindings for services as follows: + +- between a user and a service application; +- between an application and a network interface card; +- between a Service Platform and a Network Termination; +- between a Network Termination and a network access point; +- between two different access networks. + +In NGN environment, all the above bindings should be maintained to support mobility. Because of this, binding information needs to be maintained in a relevant place. + +## **8.2 Requirements for Inter-CNs MM** + +This subclause describes a set of requirements specific to Inter-CNs MM in NGN. + +### **8.2.1 Independence from network access technologies** + +It is expected that NGN will consist of an IP-based core network with several access networks that may use different access technologies, as shown in Figure 6-1. In this architecture, MM should provide mobility between either homogeneous or heterogeneous types of access networks that belong to the same or different operators. Accordingly, it is required that MM be independent of the underlying access network technologies such as 2/3G Cellular, WLAN, etc. + +### **8.2.2 Effective interworking with existing MM protocols** + +Existing ANs are likely to use their own MM instead of new MM. Accordingly, the NGN MM must be able to effectively interwork with the existing MM protocols. + +## **8.3 Requirements for Inter-ANs MM** + +This subclause describes a set of requirements specific to Inter-ANs MM in NGN. + +### **8.3.1 Independence from network access technologies** + +The same requirements apply as those listed for Inter-CN MM under 8.2.1. + +### **8.3.2 Provision of mechanisms for context transfer** + +When an MT moves across different networks, the context information of the current session, such as QoS level, security method, AAA mechanism, compression type in use, etc., might be helpful in performing the handover of the session to the new access network (e.g., minimizing the latency involved in handing the session over to new serving entities). The proper use of a context transfer mechanism could substantially reduce the amount of overhead in the servers that are, respectively or in a combined manner, used to support QoS, security, AAA, and so on. + +### **8.3.3 Effective interworking with existing MM protocols** + +Existing ANs are likely to use their own MM instead of new MM. Accordingly, the NGN MM must be able to effectively interwork with existing MM protocols. + +### **8.3.4 Provision of a handover management function for seamless services** + +MM should support handover management for maintaining session continuity during movement. Furthermore, those mechanisms should provide fast handovers to cater for seamless non real-time and real-time service requirements (e.g., VoIP and video streaming). + +In Inter-ANs MM, the handover might be a vertical handover between ANs with different access technologies because a CN can connect to various kinds of ANs. + +### **8.3.5 Support of policy-based and dynamic network selection** + +After detecting the presence of a wireless network, it should be possible for the user to choose to connect to one of the networks to obtain service, based on the following policies driven by the requirements of the service or application to be used, and presented to the user. + +NOTE – If the information is presented to a user, the user should not be expected to have enough technical knowledge about the parameters listed to take an appropriate decision. Rather, these should be looked after by the service's application software, and the options presented to the user should be only those that can support the needs of the service or application to be executed: + +- Quality of Service level needed for a particular service, e.g., bandwidth availability, time delay, packet loss ratio; +- Cost for the particular service in each network (it is presumed that the networks will provide cost information as part of the options); +- Security level that the network can provide. + +Once connected, the terminal should be able to track information of the current network based on the above-mentioned aspects. For example, when a user detects that the QoS level has gone down, it can handover the service to a new network instantly. From the user's point of view, the network switchover is not visible. + +## **8.4 Requirements for Intra-AN MM** + +This subclause describes a set of requirements specific to Intra-AN MM in NGN. + +### **8.4.1 Provision of mechanisms for context transfer** + +The same requirements apply as listed for Inter-AN MM under 8.3.2. + +### **8.4.2 Provision of a handover management function for seamless services** + +MM should support handover management for maintaining session continuity during movement. Furthermore, those mechanisms should provide fast handovers to cater for seamless non real-time and real-time service requirements (e.g., VoIP and video streaming). + +In Inter-AN MM, the handover means the horizontal handover within an AN. Accordingly, the handover in Intra-AN configurations should provide better performance than for Inter-AN configurations. + +# Appendix I + +## Classification of mobility based on network topology + +Figure I.1 shows an example of multiple levels of mobility for certain access network types and mobility technologies. Other examples for other access network types and mobility technologies are, of course, possible. The figure depicts that mobility supported at lower levels in the architecture may not be visible to higher levels. It also shows that mobility may be handled at levels all the way up to the application. + +![Diagram illustrating the classification of mobility based on network topology across five levels: Service level, Inter-access network level, Intra-access network level (Wide area), Intra-access network level (Local area), and User level. The diagram shows various network components like MSS, PSTN/SS7, GMSC, MSW, PDG, LMA, ESS, DVB-GW, GGSN, MSC, RNC/BSC, BTS, AP, and MS, with arrows indicating mobility paths between them. The bottom of the diagram categorizes the access networks into WLAN/WiMAX, DVB/ISDB-T, GPRS/UMTS data, and Cellular voice. A reference code Q.1706-Y.2801(06)_FI.1 is present in the bottom right.](79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg) + +Diagram illustrating the classification of mobility based on network topology across five levels: Service level, Inter-access network level, Intra-access network level (Wide area), Intra-access network level (Local area), and User level. The diagram shows various network components like MSS, PSTN/SS7, GMSC, MSW, PDG, LMA, ESS, DVB-GW, GGSN, MSC, RNC/BSC, BTS, AP, and MS, with arrows indicating mobility paths between them. The bottom of the diagram categorizes the access networks into WLAN/WiMAX, DVB/ISDB-T, GPRS/UMTS data, and Cellular voice. A reference code Q.1706-Y.2801(06)\_FI.1 is present in the bottom right. + +Figure I.1/Q.1706/Y.2801 – Example of levels of mobility + +- Mobility at the service level* + +Service level mobility is mobility across Circuit-Switched (CS) or Packet-Switched (PS) domains in NGN. This might be within a single NGN or across NGNs. Service level mobility might for example exploit E.164 address to Session Initiation Protocol-Uniform Resource Identifier (SIP-URI) resolution capabilities. Using these capabilities, service level mobility can be provided when a user is roaming between different administrative domains, which would necessitate inter-domain mobility at session control level. Service level mobility between different combinations of CS and PS session is possible for NGN. +- Mobility at the inter-access network level* + +Inter-access network mobility allows for users to roam across CS or PS domains using various network mobility technologies such as Mobile IP or MAP. +- Mobility at the intra-access level (Wide area)* + +Intra-access level mobility (wide area) refers to either the PS domain or CS domain in NGN. Mobility is provided by the access network technology. For example, mobility at this level might be provided by GPRS roaming technology for movement between a Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSNs) within a GGSN. + +- *Mobility at the intra-access network level (Local area)* + +Intra-access network level mobility (local area) refers to mobility within an access that uses a particular technology, generally within a limited geographic area, but handled above the radio resource control layer. + +- *Mobility at the intra-access network radio level* + +Intra-access network radio level mobility refers to the mobility at radio level (e.g., Radio Resource Control (RRC) layer in UMTS or cdma2000, Radio Resource (RR) layer in GPRS). + +- *Mobility at the personal level* + +Personal level mobility refers to the mobility at the user level. For example, a user can perform mobility between terminals, such as an IPv4 MS (Mobile Station) and an IPv6 MS. + +# BIBLIOGRAPHY + +- [Q.Sup52] ITU-T *Q-series Recommendations* – Supplement 52 (2004), *NNI mobility management requirements for systems beyond IMT-2000*. +- [M.3100] ITU-T Recommendation M.3100 (2005), *Generic network information model*. +- [E.164] ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (2005), *The international public telecommunication numbering plan*. +- [E.212] ITU-T Recommendation E.212 (2004), *The international identification plan for mobile terminals and mobile users*. +- [Q.1290] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1290 (1998), *Glossary of terms used in the definition of intelligent networks*. +- [Q.1400] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1400 (1993), *Architecture framework for the development of signalling and OA&M protocols using OSI concepts*. +- [Q.1701] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1701 (1999), *Framework for IMT-2000 networks*. +- [Q.1702] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1702 (2002), *Long-term vision of network aspects for systems beyond IMT-2000*. +- [Q.1703] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1703 (2004), *Service and network capabilities framework of network aspects for systems beyond IMT-2000*. +- [Q.1711] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1711 (1999), *Network functional model for IMT-2000*. +- [Q.1721] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1721 (2000), *Information flows for IMT-2000 capability set 1*. +- [Q.1741.2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1741.2 (2002), *IMT-2000 references to release 4 of GSM evolved UMTS core network with UTRAN access network*. +- [Q.1741.3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1741.3 (2003), *IMT-2000 references to release 5 of GSM evolved UMTS core network*. +- [Q.1742.1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1742.1 (2002), *IMT-2000 references to ANSI-41 evolved core network with cdma2000 access network*. +- [Q.1742.2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1742.2 (2003), *IMT-2000 references (approved as of 11 July 2002) to ANSI-41 evolved core network with cdma2000 access network*. +- [Q.1742.3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1742.3 (2004), *IMT-2000 references (approved as of 30 June 2003) to ANSI-41 evolved core network with cdma2000 access network*. +- [Q.1761] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1761 (2004), *Principles and requirements for convergence of fixed and existing IMT-2000 systems*. +- [M.687-2] ITU-R Recommendation M.687-2 (1997), *International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000)*. +- [M.816-1] ITU-R Recommendation M.816-1 (1997), *Framework for services supported on International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000)*. +- [M.1034-1] ITU-R Recommendation M.1034-1 (1997), *Requirements for the radio interface(s) for International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000)*. +- [M.1168] ITU-R Recommendation M.1168 (1995), *Framework of International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000)*. +- [M.1224] ITU-R Recommendation M.1224 (1997), *Vocabulary of terms for International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000)*. + + + +## ITU-T Y-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS AND NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS + +### GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------|-------------| +| General | Y.100–Y.199 | +| Services, applications and middleware | Y.200–Y.299 | +| Network aspects | Y.300–Y.399 | +| Interfaces and protocols | Y.400–Y.499 | +| Numbering, addressing and naming | Y.500–Y.599 | +| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.600–Y.699 | +| Security | Y.700–Y.799 | +| Performances | Y.800–Y.899 | + +### INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------| +| General | Y.1000–Y.1099 | +| Services and applications | Y.1100–Y.1199 | +| Architecture, access, network capabilities and resource management | Y.1200–Y.1299 | +| Transport | Y.1300–Y.1399 | +| Interworking | Y.1400–Y.1499 | +| Quality of service and network performance | Y.1500–Y.1599 | +| Signalling | Y.1600–Y.1699 | +| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.1700–Y.1799 | +| Charging | Y.1800–Y.1899 | + +### NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| Frameworks and functional architecture models | Y.2000–Y.2099 | +| Quality of Service and performance | Y.2100–Y.2199 | +| Service aspects: Service capabilities and service architecture | Y.2200–Y.2249 | +| Service aspects: Interoperability of services and networks in NGN | Y.2250–Y.2299 | +| Numbering, naming and addressing | Y.2300–Y.2399 | +| Network management | Y.2400–Y.2499 | +| Network control architectures and protocols | Y.2500–Y.2599 | +| Security | Y.2700–Y.2799 | +| Generalized mobility | Y.2800–Y.2899 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1731-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1731-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b18e5b07ba6a266813c0ce76e92f4e93c0d9fd4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1731-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c7a97195c2fd68ad39d82d19b808d1738dce3aa52e94325870a031b5a2ea7c01 +size 8275 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea220a1d99cdd7dffee0baf2508580d1ea3e8cea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f844feb76f6b132a0f5fbf1e0b7b0f3ed67f58473d52a2e9fd9433640cfcc7ae +size 43819 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/10b0dda884baae493ad958422d11b552_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/10b0dda884baae493ad958422d11b552_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9f1cb71a7d5d45a8d65b0356a37f53ed92dbd60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/10b0dda884baae493ad958422d11b552_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:baae62b2d9000419ee99f4ff6a5d475bafca0d09ef9a466e8758dbec3a6c0878 +size 25469 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80e04735251afcfc2dac814f01292762d24f600c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:655211b1b19b4a3fe76f23017bcbaa8ad223b279c8a91ded931d8e358f0e52bf +size 15687 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac219dfc353cc93cdf0a3808bded7038b95190f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b85a13202c0180c63f82f6d97c04d41f7adbd7d78e8b76c7e0dbfe23dbefe38f +size 125105 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/789ee0a267b24f34bd1f45313e86c9a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/789ee0a267b24f34bd1f45313e86c9a4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..847652c7a8ea9db36fce2d905545045234834397 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/789ee0a267b24f34bd1f45313e86c9a4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dc111c001c2c1a6d253482750f8bb33ba64f6f7afe0622afde1b54339484e3fd +size 104577 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7973f353296ea3a5ca17d2eadecd4387fe08c7e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4bd989d847dae00973512218801d021e6b125b74a08a1b2f7c15f97c6f9b8ba2 +size 19409 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0386330604c38e115ace34ea4289d870efcbe98 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:62572aa991f707c0571bd38a5be51eae4e7989e8c34e8db98cac10b2b0aa2b1f +size 59674 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/dfafe39c233a62ec8ebd71e42992c14d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/dfafe39c233a62ec8ebd71e42992c14d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcba0338d02a62ca2ab843dc76e93f8b8ec00b54 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1741.7-201111-I_PDF-E/dfafe39c233a62ec8ebd71e42992c14d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f19bb2a268c70844d538c07ef59d61c8bc232018a28c42d10aa4d2c0c789e6d3 +size 41252 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4643b8e895116ee86e6e0623108f89da910164e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f6a763af46bba8aaeb76701c137af2d1bdec60c145e3cd2cfe52bdcfb01acdb8 +size 3635 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/366a77fdefb0097b3289b4a011911390_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/366a77fdefb0097b3289b4a011911390_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03abf8c1d699ca01f9d5fbcb100a2a72c948a83b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/366a77fdefb0097b3289b4a011911390_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9bd6bee8ac46ce7b91640b3911e225f148d316f7b2fca5deb5e2b38c43ebbde4 +size 211685 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/ed75e80b1e08237f7e90b65357de84d5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/ed75e80b1e08237f7e90b65357de84d5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..457bb69fc7cc2303180a2a5b8badd7e91ad73e62 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.10-201304-I_PDF-E/ed75e80b1e08237f7e90b65357de84d5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2fd9bf0c4b63b01de1fd08849ebdf46f1c5d752a00fad8eadbda966202f31c62 +size 232181 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79a6d5dabf091da897ae022859ce726a7cafa500 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:85bdf453e798712d29d23862732bb8ffb0bcbfea503270d2c3ddf935efff0946 +size 189644 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939eb6a57fac47a375526475ba6c31bf67e08b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52a289bbb49d106b16f646b5050f62e5c7cbe1bb201f8c767547c3039abbf359 +size 8245 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41cd55a7ee9be4a98cce5dccd06912f85c8f4115 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e9cacd91ed9654cfbc400729318d11813e27fdd51aea14b30e94c7cdecb1b59f +size 214348 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5445597cceefaca1ac89e710fe339325_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5445597cceefaca1ac89e710fe339325_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4b7e59d4e82c50044d0896be656ef3b4940ea36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5445597cceefaca1ac89e710fe339325_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:72df429d7c4c447b48e53d9a3b1d8a665ee1c7073fb03a414d5c45ab29556ec4 +size 17586 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be9f31f744e96ae51447c98f00a1a5e9c129a9bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:371bb04348a58e903c306792034d57febd4841934aa70028c1fd44702e0a14aa +size 236920 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/73b5cce955ba9415a98791db7b0080ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/73b5cce955ba9415a98791db7b0080ad_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67d0f9359aece3ef55b9f28b21c7874570f49ef0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/73b5cce955ba9415a98791db7b0080ad_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d86f94d45c4cb809cc24fa5b40037ef91021ab46d494844088f535226cbaadcf +size 52835 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4694188144a2f7097b3e726f1277029c51ecdaf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1742.2-200307-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:393db468d4e98be684f15551e9078af05e5ea33f9dbfe9406ba6c2592eb39de7 +size 187549 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/0348dd87efbccba766e98138b073b499_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/0348dd87efbccba766e98138b073b499_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24347142f0326c309f642427f7c9030933120f24 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/0348dd87efbccba766e98138b073b499_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f4ccca02d300934e60b9aa977760720cba07c15e46ab8adde3e4a684b35ae6e1 +size 29793 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/03703ee0fb20f67f19e3eb7c97a4b1e4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/03703ee0fb20f67f19e3eb7c97a4b1e4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5d977183c6f5fea8cb539fa2d21530a5d5f51e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/03703ee0fb20f67f19e3eb7c97a4b1e4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b89cd132e4cba71ab962ff3f89c36b1074f2ff09a686d3058cf2780ac307106a +size 66224 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/037f0f683efaa7f7d98458c351d3ce6b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/037f0f683efaa7f7d98458c351d3ce6b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e67bb1420455e48960fd63a95cad4faf5defd6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/037f0f683efaa7f7d98458c351d3ce6b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b60293c9e5eb872701cfdd074a518fc7b3a75c2c3bdbf4dbbdcca3e6d62c19f +size 67109 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/114a0aef3954cf8b22aa8e081fe1061d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/114a0aef3954cf8b22aa8e081fe1061d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..13b48fd676f17f0f42ac42838ce1583a77641d1d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/114a0aef3954cf8b22aa8e081fe1061d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d353cfe64947bdaf5479ea24dc46ff34d5c9bec4c209256c5c71432d6f7b70a5 +size 26010 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..827609df9ad8667ae079f875841506349f063390 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c0d2afb537db9f3588854962a991eb1178220b2bbb8ff3cea6712979a53a864b +size 4107 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/1582c665ca9405e127473c291eaed480_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/1582c665ca9405e127473c291eaed480_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a1bfde9ac91d91cd8e1372ce7f558baa173d5cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/1582c665ca9405e127473c291eaed480_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:81bfb0bda6b8361473b7a420c8ef65cd81304ab35bb134043e9288c301af2e04 +size 49024 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/17eec1b738f991333d48c8bfb6fd8788_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/17eec1b738f991333d48c8bfb6fd8788_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..866c844a210f9e668567f2e0e1af8da207157c0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/17eec1b738f991333d48c8bfb6fd8788_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:84ce0a590cbe351ae09769e13e630bf56f8b7adbc4e2bc798165a8976314fecc +size 40787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/23e6f8e908eb73b54a419d58740a33bb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/23e6f8e908eb73b54a419d58740a33bb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a5e7d15d67c94c93ff55108461cf5890057dada --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/23e6f8e908eb73b54a419d58740a33bb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1e60f9484df7a9845901b29c616035a79942700ae14c8704ff905a4599afbd72 +size 44790 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/29aa6165ccf449dee0b4335676fa7b1a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/29aa6165ccf449dee0b4335676fa7b1a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c43bcd68309f17b5644e3a5fdae7baabdaf0d60 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/29aa6165ccf449dee0b4335676fa7b1a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:407bb389d869070c3ce537626c5d8fd639dcd939de26dc33baf624b9af674130 +size 62784 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/2b4c2fa86025b729e29212013baf949e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/2b4c2fa86025b729e29212013baf949e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7525d80b3154e2fd134ccc5704cec0567f1fac1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/2b4c2fa86025b729e29212013baf949e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f41c0d25d531be6e4a075e2bcf8b53bc8e51a4b445d9dfe18046d375fd4613fd +size 36513 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/3c8ddf97c5854434ed0c16c733ac5d95_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/3c8ddf97c5854434ed0c16c733ac5d95_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7abab05a256755721e8e3a55fbab9e9d31a6f63 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/3c8ddf97c5854434ed0c16c733ac5d95_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:24472ff3f180fb2762b33d2083c1539baf1d2c4802048a69b3a4baea028fee53 +size 30869 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4b03e06b7cc580cbc6a32b1b9f2f3183_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4b03e06b7cc580cbc6a32b1b9f2f3183_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4cad4f6b38ea3e98d1e0907e1b16cda49524ac1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4b03e06b7cc580cbc6a32b1b9f2f3183_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5d7c6d22a0e971e8d68119f0e4024143a67c48a1072d47643cda48b8c7d37ce1 +size 48081 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4e3cb8537ac290a5f8ac26eb2a86101f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4e3cb8537ac290a5f8ac26eb2a86101f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fddcb88381ce9a27521d04bfd0944953603c145b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/4e3cb8537ac290a5f8ac26eb2a86101f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:be800939eb97dd6f8657ae21b85e0e86bb6e3e72b2a38ea073060d5c2f5e574c +size 112191 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/5bd8085079508bb158cfc55b1007a459_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/5bd8085079508bb158cfc55b1007a459_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02750960bb984c536b56a25cab9a14d72fd153c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/5bd8085079508bb158cfc55b1007a459_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fc6f684c76af0228c83ed6692f02529bf28ad736730815b6e23250c5410c2e70 +size 61207 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/704b156dcd1ecf3be80d76d150dbedf9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/704b156dcd1ecf3be80d76d150dbedf9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..559b25986de62e096ebd0f0994e77e1eadb61879 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/704b156dcd1ecf3be80d76d150dbedf9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1c2b797c1c0737637133ef4919be7ad447230fc8ac4b24b15f9bd588c351c14a +size 63866 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/79e37b4f8cee1318b5ed68e32a2f12a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/79e37b4f8cee1318b5ed68e32a2f12a4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34456a8acbdb5eef99768b5c35ff69ce7abc09ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/79e37b4f8cee1318b5ed68e32a2f12a4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:89644ca92de772fac64ba3d25a2b906a6b0846f5c4334a36219dcfc9b6a18b2c +size 78714 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/7edaf7f3c329944f60a4466c26153584_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/7edaf7f3c329944f60a4466c26153584_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a54189618947b98121fa469bb7884fa77f4285be --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/7edaf7f3c329944f60a4466c26153584_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:31db6cdff2d0f8cbcb915cb135574904a6a12562fb45a198228b12cc5d27f9f2 +size 70579 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/98262e1b79b0955297ed71c7ce626826_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/98262e1b79b0955297ed71c7ce626826_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..218b30841452a6b533d0cdba75a3fbac926f3cde --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/98262e1b79b0955297ed71c7ce626826_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6b6eeb64fef3b76a4d153411972b4ef91499f0a08d1f208ed4f76fa0e4894cc9 +size 46907 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/acbbe300fca5bb39264af5b2ce81cd1b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/acbbe300fca5bb39264af5b2ce81cd1b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33e23ed2cab2cf5277d039897b6f10c879e22387 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/acbbe300fca5bb39264af5b2ce81cd1b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:96b033881f39d84a02d18854e6d1d5d30f04818c3678cbf48a576621401b79ec +size 43965 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/c71cc20c24544f057770d4066ecaadc4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/c71cc20c24544f057770d4066ecaadc4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..064e91ba65b51e06c87d0d75d7941fc9a584638c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/c71cc20c24544f057770d4066ecaadc4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:be4408d6d4d5e14df25ae44f0ae7a87d2ec85018564b6317e762a2e59b81fdcc +size 31385 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/d9862ac8473902e7dfe441c5e88d47d8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/d9862ac8473902e7dfe441c5e88d47d8_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18328c188bf0efe9ea9ab1804650a54f74488884 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/d9862ac8473902e7dfe441c5e88d47d8_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:afd368c612969f3f185929a32ba8f80349e30fa9d5da0b3c014fc63dafcefb1c +size 84488 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/da308c919c2b05d507cd6eb4dc7c00f9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/da308c919c2b05d507cd6eb4dc7c00f9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..249cd032798b797a3ab7798483d35f814985480f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/da308c919c2b05d507cd6eb4dc7c00f9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b880cce5012089be923f79589165b9385e4777bac9ba37aa3e7f23b4cc394bd +size 27474 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/daf1327845530d34d947965102385bfa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/daf1327845530d34d947965102385bfa_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1965d1b34ed73dab2a63d7db3d7024c4e2e49845 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/daf1327845530d34d947965102385bfa_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:79749e40b39f436445cb62901e3e8911819f319283fb9c9c60e44b3fde2e293c +size 23646 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/decc27040435a188fd6734a9002e5312_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/decc27040435a188fd6734a9002e5312_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edc7db966950152a1b7f599f351500e17c15d4db --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/decc27040435a188fd6734a9002e5312_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:41f0bead6d32a58982cd788f3e4b86e17f55cfa3f2a2e43a86d772de1c491997 +size 32433 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/e67f460676b783e7bf400213fe55066e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/e67f460676b783e7bf400213fe55066e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73e206139d21cf00518aad55221ec6803a698471 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/e67f460676b783e7bf400213fe55066e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:681c37318a26a4573a7317eba3430523618de2e89a4cdd2cb03c1bdae7ca8fa0 +size 47775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/f18e5c74883bf40027b353a61ffc3f9f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/f18e5c74883bf40027b353a61ffc3f9f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac46bcfe6bf3ce0004cfb2d1bd4016c3d6526a41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/f18e5c74883bf40027b353a61ffc3f9f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9f4b8e84e302963b55eddbdab02a38eb74c4ed5e575649e7892c4e7de7c1d611 +size 21627 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/ff3a3d26b4b40920cf1377205fb08445_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/ff3a3d26b4b40920cf1377205fb08445_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b8f0cfdcd85bddf06ebd17ccb79cead61336f27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1912.5-201801-I_PDF-E/ff3a3d26b4b40920cf1377205fb08445_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca6d70455341bfbf8b444cc3be6aa4e0756cb2d3fa6422941aad6c194fc0647f +size 101151 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c91dec28196e2fc27d1487da120bdbbec247635 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fdb34a37a7075d4d979640c07d0bfb75946e24635e17cb68692373984d43f67e +size 26352 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/1b896a95bc9974ad01fac7ac6f541a96_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/1b896a95bc9974ad01fac7ac6f541a96_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d330cab03ad8e943db667601b8dbaeec73c251f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/1b896a95bc9974ad01fac7ac6f541a96_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:92240ebcf56456f721314f5ef7b25a4b52e1f475971359cc4f506fe44680ae00 +size 45201 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c0c73a6b1c1452b28bdb9ace3364ef8712b040d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:918856d707d44d2b6816333bd3ab17245b7ca6e7d7dcbf81a5f92a45078c43f8 +size 8203 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2ee59e629035d641140e55f4d215b0d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2ee59e629035d641140e55f4d215b0d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0653b2c22c5bf78be5e81226b86903bfe9bc967 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/2ee59e629035d641140e55f4d215b0d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:367bbef439448575d4e1cd4a71a8bf5985ea6bf6d4f4833a64f041ed6d6fe70b +size 67413 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d8f635be7a24a2c3d57b23d80114c721c0846d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:353fdcc55a7dc9f8fff6dbc50e78ccff3b206e1787d5c42f62256c05a74359f7 +size 21012 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4de10ca62b768dfa4195cb162967a3306c6aff5c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:04e59cbfff1b518d94511ac984fd69767ade94ab3e43571bd07e0302b9df6700 +size 24889 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1b9e3838897a6669db33541415ddf5a7c5a44f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fac8dae49626b8886215805c0688c5a52e9319ca129921757297bc3c95c120ae +size 19795 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ada84a414bfa5b924354f12bf8ee16e694040067 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:85d339423fa7588e07a42e4434e0a4cf5380a98bc78d2547ae416555a9e919ef +size 26487 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b18eee8b5e851c6ad6bb9013c115f420fb84efa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0a17ced25c853664ed18b4cbd46477507d48db91abfdc79bbeac8058f9d09ba5 +size 21063 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2760825d015e2522027401322bf80b99762318e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf94704551774b96fb29cc2feadd379f2e5d974cbac4d8f465af2e566c544363 +size 38409 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..830e7661b3257df75d31fd078cc9ff1b31d1d2f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2010-199502-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.2010** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(02/95) + +**GENERAL ASPECTS OF B-ISDN** + +--- + +**BROADBAND INTEGRATED SERVICES +DIGITAL NETWORK OVERVIEW – +SIGNALLING CAPABILITY SET 1, +RELEASE 1** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.2010** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2010 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 7th February 1995. + +--- + +# NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +*Page* + +| | | | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|---| +| 1 | Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 | B-ISDN signalling reference configuration ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Signalling relations..... | 1 | +| 4 | Abbreviations ..... | 3 | +| 5 | Signalling transfer modes..... | 3 | +| 6 | Signalling protocol stacks ..... | 5 | +| 7 | Basic principles of the Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM)..... | 6 | +| 8 | ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) functions ..... | 7 | +| 8.1 | Signalling AAL at the UNI..... | 7 | +| 8.2 | Signalling AAL at the NNI..... | 7 | +| 9 | Signalling higher layer functions ..... | 8 | +| 9.1 | UNI ..... | 8 | +| 9.2 | NNI ..... | 8 | + +# **SUMMARY** + +This Recommendation provides an introduction to signalling in the broadband integrated services digital network. Included is a presentation of the signalling reference configurations, possible signalling relationships between network entities, the signalling protocol stacks used in these configurations and pointers to Recommendations which provide the detailed protocol descriptions. Also included is a brief introduction to the principles of ATM. + +## BROADBAND INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK OVERVIEW – SIGNALLING CAPABILITY SET 1, RELEASE 1 + +(Geneva, 1995) + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation covers an overview of the basic concepts, reference configurations and protocols related to the provision of signalling capabilities in a Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN). + +# 2 B-ISDN signalling reference configuration + +The overall B-ISDN signalling reference configuration is shown in Figure 1. It includes broadband terminal or terminal adaptation equipment (B-TE1, B-TA), the access distribution function by which terminal equipment access the access switching network, the transit switching network and the signalling network. + +![Diagram of B-ISDN signalling reference configuration showing two parallel paths for terminal equipment (B-TE1 or B-TA) connected to Access Distribution, then Access Switching Network, then Transit Switching Network, with a central Signalling Network connected to both Access Switching Networks.](1b896a95bc9974ad01fac7ac6f541a96_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the B-ISDN signalling reference configuration. It features two identical horizontal paths at the top and bottom. Each path starts with a rectangular box labeled 'B-TE1 or B-TA' connected to an oval labeled 'Access Distribution', which is then connected to an oval labeled 'Access Switching Network'. Both 'Access Switching Network' ovals are connected to a central oval labeled 'Signalling Network'. Each 'Access Switching Network' is also connected to an oval labeled 'Transit Switching Network'. The two 'Transit Switching Network' ovals are connected by a vertical line. A small code 'T1162100-94/d01' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Diagram of B-ISDN signalling reference configuration showing two parallel paths for terminal equipment (B-TE1 or B-TA) connected to Access Distribution, then Access Switching Network, then Transit Switching Network, with a central Signalling Network connected to both Access Switching Networks. + +FIGURE 1/Q.2010 +B-ISDN signalling reference configuration + +# 3 Signalling relations + +Figure 2 depicts the signalling relations in two access distribution configurations, one in which the terminal equipment accesses the access switching network via Broadband Network Termination Equipment (B-NT2) and one in which the terminal equipment accesses the access switching network directly. + +The point-to-point signalling relation Pu is used for call establishment. For point-to-point access at the User-Network Interface (UNI) the point-to-point signalling relation Pu is established permanently and used for call offering, call establishment and call release. The protocol stacks associated with Pu are identified in clause 5. + +![Diagrams (a) and (b) showing point-to-point signalling relations between terminal equipment and the local exchange network.](191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + subgraph a [a) Point-to-Point Terminal Equipment with B-NT2] + A1[B-TE1 or B-TA] -- Pu --- B1[B-NT2] + B1 -- Pu --> C1[To local Exchange Network] + end + subgraph b [b) Point-to-point Terminal Equipment] + A2[B-TE1 or B-TA] -- Pu --> C2[To local Exchange Network] + end + +``` + +a) Point-to-Point Terminal Equipment with B-NT2 + +b) Point-to-point Terminal Equipment + +T1162110-94/d02 + +Diagrams (a) and (b) showing point-to-point signalling relations between terminal equipment and the local exchange network. + +**FIGURE 2/Q.2010** +**Local distribution (including terminal equipment)** + +Figures 3 and 4 show the signalling relations in the access switching and transit switching networks, respectively. + +![Diagram of a Local Exchange showing Pu, Pa, and Pq signalling relations.](f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + LD[To Local Distribution] <--- Pu --- LE[Local Exchange] + PP[Point-to-point] <--- Pu --- LE + LE --- Pa ---> TN[To Transit Network or Local Exchange Network] + LE -. Pq .-> SN[To Signalling Network] + +``` + +T1162120-94/d03 + +Diagram of a Local Exchange showing Pu, Pa, and Pq signalling relations. + +**FIGURE 3/Q.2010** +**Access switching network** + +![Diagram of a Transit Exchange network showing signalling associations. A central box is labeled 'Transit Exchange'. Above it, two dashed lines with arrows pointing outwards are labeled 'Pa', with text 'To Transit Network or Local Exchange Network' on both sides. Below the box, a dashed line with an arrow pointing left is labeled 'Pq', with text 'To Signalling Network' below it. To the right of the bottom dashed line is the text 'T1162130-94/d04'. Below the diagram is a legend: 'Pu' (solid line) is 'Point-to-point Signalling Relation'; 'Pa' (dashed line) is 'Pt-pt Signalling Association for Associated Signalling'; 'Pq' (dashed line) is 'Pt-pt Signalling Association for Quasi-associated Signalling'.](fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg) + +Diagram of a Transit Exchange network showing signalling associations. A central box is labeled 'Transit Exchange'. Above it, two dashed lines with arrows pointing outwards are labeled 'Pa', with text 'To Transit Network or Local Exchange Network' on both sides. Below the box, a dashed line with an arrow pointing left is labeled 'Pq', with text 'To Signalling Network' below it. To the right of the bottom dashed line is the text 'T1162130-94/d04'. Below the diagram is a legend: 'Pu' (solid line) is 'Point-to-point Signalling Relation'; 'Pa' (dashed line) is 'Pt-pt Signalling Association for Associated Signalling'; 'Pq' (dashed line) is 'Pt-pt Signalling Association for Quasi-associated Signalling'. + +FIGURE 4/Q.2010 +**Transit switching network** + +# 4 Abbreviations + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following abbreviations are used: + +| | | +|---------|----------------------------------------------------| +| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode | +| CP | Common Part | +| DSS 1 | Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 | +| MTP | Message Transfer Part | +| PH | Physical | +| SCS-1 | Signalling Capability Set 1 | +| SSP-AAL | Service Specific Part for the ATM Adaptation Layer | +| VCC | Virtual Channel Connections | + +# 5 Signalling transfer modes + +At the NNI, two different modes of signalling transfer can be found. The first is called associated mode. This mode of signalling transfer is used to exchange signalling information directly between signalling nodes, without the assistance of any other signalling node. The second mode of operation is the quasi-associated mode. In this case, messages are exchanged via one or more intermediate signalling nodes. In Figure 5, these associations are shown as PA and PQ respectively. + +Figure 5 presents a composite picture of the signalling relationships and the signalling modes that may exist in broadband networks. + +![Diagram of signalling relations in B-ISDN showing various network elements like TE, LEX, TEX, and (B-)STP connected by different types of signalling relations (PU, PA, PQ).](2ee59e629035d641140e55f4d215b0d7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signalling architecture in a B-ISDN. At the center is a circle representing a (B-)STP. Four lines, each labeled 'PQ', radiate from this central point to four surrounding rectangular boxes: 'LEX' (top-left), 'TEX' (top), 'LEX' (right), and 'TEX' (bottom). Each of these boxes is further connected to an external entity: the top-left 'LEX' to a 'TE', the top 'TEX' to another 'TEX', the right 'LEX' to a 'TE', and the bottom 'TEX' to a 'TE'. The top-right 'LEX' is also connected to an 'NT2 (Note 1)' box. The connections are represented by different line styles: solid lines for 'PA' (Pt-pt Signalling Association for associated Signalling Transfer at NNI), dashed lines for 'PQ' (Pt-pt Signalling Association for Quasi-associated Signalling Transfer at NNI), and dotted lines for 'PU' (Pt-pt Signalling Relation at UNI). The diagram is labeled 'T1162140-94/d05' in the bottom right corner. + +Diagram of signalling relations in B-ISDN showing various network elements like TE, LEX, TEX, and (B-)STP connected by different types of signalling relations (PU, PA, PQ). + +- Facilities used to transfer signalling information at NNI +- Signalling Relation +- PU Pt-pt Signalling Relation at UNI +- PA Pt-pt Signalling Association for associated Signalling Transfer at NNI +- PQ Pt-pt Signalling Association for Quasi-associated Signalling Transfer at NNI +- LEX Local Exchange +- TEX Transit Exchange +- STP Signal Transfer Point + +# NOTES + +- 1 It is for further study whether this should be NT2/TE. +- 2 For the UNI, the facilities to transfer the signalling information are not show. + +FIGURE 5/Q.2010 +**Signalling relations in B-ISDN** + +# 6 Signalling protocol stacks + +Figure 6 shows the protocol stack used at the User-Network Interface (UNI) and the applicable Recommendations which cover the detailed protocol descriptions. + +![](562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg) + +| Protocol stack control-plane | Recommendations (Note) | +|------------------------------|------------------------| +| Q.93B | Q.2931 | +| SPP-AAL | Q.2110, Q.2130 | +| — — — — — | | +| CP-AAL | I.362, I.363 | +| ATM | I.361 | +| PH | I.432 | + +T01.DRW + +NOTE – For the PU, the SSP-AAL operates in the assured mode. + +FIGURE 6/Q.2010 +**Signalling protocol stack at the UNI** + +At the NNI either the ATM network or, as a national option, the existing Signalling System No. 7 network can be used for signalling information transfer. Figures 7 and 8 show the protocol stacks used in the two options. + +![](dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg) + +| Protocol stack control-plane | Recommendations (Note) | +|------------------------------|--------------------------------| +| B-ISUP | Q.2761, Q.2762, Q.2763, Q.2764 | +| MTP-3 | Q.704 | +| SPP-AAL | Q.2110, Q.2140 | +| — — — — — | | +| CP-AAL | I.362, I.363 | +| ATM | I.432 | +| PH | I.432 | + +T02.DRW + +NOTE – The B-ISUP is only terminated at the endpoints of the signalling relation. + +FIGURE 7/Q.2010 +**Signalling protocol stack if the ATM network is used (PA and PQ)** + +![](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +| Protocol stack
control-plane | Recommendations
(Note) | +|---------------------------------|--------------------------------| +| B-ISUP | Q.2761, Q.2762, Q.2763, Q.2764 | +| MTP-3 | Q.704 | +| MTP-2 | Q.703 | +| MTP-1 | Q.702 | + +T03.DRW + +NOTE – The B-ISUP is only terminated at the endpoints of the signalling relation. + +FIGURE 8/Q.2010 + +## **Signalling protocol stack if the existing SS No. 7 network interface is used (PA and PQ)** + +# 7 Basic principles of the Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) + +ATM is the transfer mode solution for implementing a B-ISDN. It influences the standardization of digital hierarchies, multiplexing structures, switching and interfaces for broadband signals. + +ATM is used in this Recommendation for addressing a specific packet-oriented transfer mode which uses asynchronous time-division multiplexing techniques. The multiplexed information flow is organized into blocks of fixed size cells. A cell consists of an information field header. The primary role of the header is to identify cells belonging to the same virtual channel within the asynchronous time-division multiplex. Cell sequence integrity on a virtual channel connection is preserved by the ATM layer. + +ATM is a connection-oriented technique. Connection identifiers are assigned to each link of a connection when required and released when no longer needed. In general, signalling and user information are carried on separate ATM layer connections. + +ATM offers a flexible transfer capability common to all services, including connectionless services. Additional functionalities on top of the ATM layer [e.g. in the ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL)] are provided to accommodate various services. The boundary between the ATM layer and the AAL corresponds to the boundary between functions supported by the AAL-specific information. The AAL-specific information is contained in the information field of the ATM cell. + +The information field is transported transparently by the ATM layer. No processing, e.g. error control, is performed on the information field at the ATM layer. + +The header and information field each consists of a fixed integer number of octets. The header size (5 octets) and the information fields (48 octets) remain constant at all reference points, including the User Network Interface (UNI) and the Network Node Interface (NNI), where the ATM technique is applied. Additional details are provided in Recommendations I.150, B-ISDN ATM functional characteristics, and I.361, B-ISDN ATM layer specifications. + +# 8 ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) functions + +This clause will describe briefly the services that the ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) must provide to the higher layers in order to support B-ISDN signalling. + +The AAL performs functions required by the control plane and supports the mapping between the ATM layer and the next higher. The functions performed in the AAL depend upon the higher layer requirements for signalling. + +Architecturally, the AAL is a layer between the ATM layer and the next higher layer in the control plane. The B-ISDN protocol reference model is given in Recommendation I.321. + +The signalling AAL is functionally divided into a Common Part (CP) and a Service Specific Part (SSP) as shown in Figure 9. The CP can be used in different SSPs; the SSP is specific to the needs of the service application. The following understanding about the CP and SSP exists at the UNI and NNI respectively. + +![Functional division of the signalling AAL diagram](7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the functional division of the signalling AAL. It shows two main components: SSP-AAL (Service Specific AAL) and CP-AAL (Common Part AAL). The SSP-AAL is connected to 'Service Specific AAL Functions' on its left and 'Peer-to-Peer messages' on its right. The CP-AAL is connected to 'Common Part AAL Functions' on its left and 'Peer-to-Peer messages' on its right. Both components are connected to a central vertical line representing the ATM layer, which is flanked by two oval symbols representing the UNI/NNI interfaces. The text 'T1162150-94/d06' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Functional division of the signalling AAL diagram + +FIGURE 9/Q.2010 +Functional division of the signalling AAL + +## 8.1 Signalling AAL at the UNI + +The protocol stacks showing the AAL functionality at the UNI for point-to-point are illustrated in Figure 6. + +## 8.2 Signalling AAL at the NNI + +The protocol stack showing the AAL functionality at the NNI for point-to-point application in the associated mode and quasi-associated mode is illustrated in Figures 7 and 8. + +# 9 Signalling higher layer functions + +A stage 2 service description is provided in Recommendation Q.71. The higher layer protocols for signalling are, in general, responsible for call and bearer control. As these functions differ somewhat at UNI and at the NNI, different protocols are used. + +## 9.1 UNI + +The call/connection control functions are: + +- call establishment and release1); +- bearer establishment and release, for point-to-point VCCs2) ; +- compatibility checking; +- support of N-ISDN services and signalling interworking between N-ISDN and B-ISDN; +- support of some supplementary services (see Recommendations Q.2951 and Q.2957). + +## 9.2 NNI + +The call/bearer connection control functions are: + +- call establishment and release1); +- bearer connection establishment and release, for point-to-point VCCs2); +- transfer of access transport information; +- support of some supplementary services (see Recommendation Q.2730); +- interworking with N-ISDN services. + +Signalling network functions are according to Recommendation Q.704. For SCS-1 (Release 1), the signalling protocols are based on the Signalling System No. 7 Recommendation. + +--- + +1) For SCS-1 (Release 1), calls and bearer connections are established and released simultaneously. + +2) Other communication configurations will be studied during the 1993-1996 study period. For SCS-1 (Release 1), the signalling protocols are based on the DSS 1 and ISUP Recommendations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5f59fb42c91093eb17b390e4d4a62e7eeb55597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e27ab8056fcf27d830ebeb759a18cda3aec259a51dd82401e8417ae8b24b12e4 +size 119695 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939eb6a57fac47a375526475ba6c31bf67e08b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52a289bbb49d106b16f646b5050f62e5c7cbe1bb201f8c767547c3039abbf359 +size 8245 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fb5f1b7be50611fb8e66f97dc08df52a061442e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0c9cb3f997b52e804c79cb693d136b0a9f5e73a481c8eb13331daf9b0a309c39 +size 69585 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e2a1c7529d3fe49ed128e2f38d3888cf45c8bcb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b021a8a7435da844ee63cdc9a7bacc7fced026df018ea66c763ea07e0a0b0248 +size 102505 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..439637b017b3ea5ecb952fd7f285599e63363783 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae99c1b7ac1cb44badd47cc9fcf10c4b9736a25535d6d66e71c2c1691860a8e5 +size 18452 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a6c99ae0314c290e750962c0a137164503a8443 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b89ae7b02837394cd92ca046b387ebf032cc91ba07ef37523af784adf266541 +size 69858 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/abc0eb594f9d2c0daa0e60df05f2a666_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/abc0eb594f9d2c0daa0e60df05f2a666_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10b777e49eef00062eead191573b81a4809995d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/abc0eb594f9d2c0daa0e60df05f2a666_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5e17678c3363fa4e0d6b65c3ffb26f54b6cc0b735e92c55986658cabf0229d83 +size 158994 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8009850b2c33a2bb307db1a4fec8b4a07b3747b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:16fc9e2ecc69c1333472f4763858de37e9c570eee368a580ffcf9ecdf84c2003 +size 135763 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c67d21fb3d9042e88cdc669f071b4e7c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c67d21fb3d9042e88cdc669f071b4e7c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7528bf859c577f81a5fa973f0e80f8703bb9930d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/c67d21fb3d9042e88cdc669f071b4e7c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e4b9d6776fb226dfa174db4308264e7f9519f0a35bd7ba8c3f922f7693bc5c1c +size 60369 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48ce6a295a818ad9c808fc8049acbb848999a009 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5ab8e3b5d3799829348bd9eb61e13e2a4745745d0e641cf24f82fbeacf15bf97 +size 23535 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c3b6f8c1d4b2d14ce91bf25e10a8dca8f000b94 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d11594766aaa481bcc8db80a1174fe600c3409d4d344b761a2d01a38b596675f +size 95292 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e80fcc92a5e1b119f7b2c3176211c1a2c3c14111 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2220-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,2206 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a lightning bolt superimposed on it, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.2220** + +(12/2002) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Broadband ISDN – Signalling network protocols + +# --- **Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP)** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2220 + +--- + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 4 | Q.120-Q.139 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 5 | Q.140-Q.199 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250-Q.309 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310-Q.399 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| General aspects | Q.2000-Q.2099 | +| Signalling ATM adaptation layer (SAAL) | Q.2100-Q.2199 | +| Signalling network protocols | Q.2200-Q.2299 | +| Common aspects of B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling and network signalling and interworking | Q.2600-Q.2699 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for the network signalling | Q.2700-Q.2899 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling | Q.2900-Q.2999 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.2220** + +# **Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP)** + +## **Summary** + +ITU-T Recs Q.711, Q.712, Q.713, Q.714, Q.715 and Q.716 define the services of the Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP). The SCCP provides, above the signalling transport network (or networks) connection-oriented, connectionless, routing, and management services. ITU-T Rec. Q.711 defines the services provided; ITU-T Rec. Q.714 describes the procedures performed by the SCCP. These procedures make use of the messages and information elements defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.712, whose formatting and coding aspects are specified in ITU-T Rec. Q.713. ITU-T Rec. Q.715 is a guide for the SCCP and ITU-T Rec. Q.716 defines SCCP performance. + +This Recommendation defines the Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP), which consists of a modification to SCCP that allows it to operate on various signalling transport networks. In addition to the MTP3 and MTP3b networks, TI-SCCP can operate on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE based networks as well as on IP-networks by utilizing the transport protocol defined in RFCs 2960 and 3309. + +The independence of the particular signalling transport technology is achieved by basing the TI-SCCP on the Generic Signalling Transport Service (ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0) and deploying one of the Signalling Transport Converters specified in ITU-T Recs Q.2150.1, Q.2150.2, or Q.2150.3. + +### **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2220 was approved on 29 December 2002 by ITU-T Study Group 11 (2001-2004) under the ITU-T Resolution A.8 procedure. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2004 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +###### Page + +| | | | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 2 | +| 2.1 | Normative references..... | 2 | +| 2.2 | Informative references..... | 2 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 3 | +| 4 | Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| 5 | Signalling network architecture..... | 6 | +| 5.1 | General architecture..... | 6 | +| 5.2 | Interworking of TI-SCCP with SCCP ..... | 7 | +| 6 | Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.711 ..... | 8 | +| 6.1 | General ..... | 8 | +| 6.2 | Scope and field of application ..... | 9 | +| 6.3 | Primitives..... | 9 | +| 6.4 | Removal of the embedded service..... | 10 | +| 6.5 | Reason for return ..... | 10 | +| 6.6 | SCCP management..... | 10 | +| 6.7 | Definition of the lower boundary of the SCCP ..... | 11 | +| 7 | Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.712..... | 12 | +| 7.1 | Signalling connection control part messages ..... | 12 | +| 7.2 | SCCP message parameters ..... | 13 | +| 7.3 | Inclusion of fields in the messages..... | 13 | +| 8 | Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.713 ..... | 13 | +| 8.1 | Introduction ..... | 13 | +| 8.2 | Coding of the general parts..... | 16 | +| 8.3 | SCCP parameters..... | 17 | +| 8.4 | SCCP messages and codes ..... | 17 | +| 8.5 | SCCP management messages and codes..... | 19 | +| 8.6 | Mapping for cause parameter values ..... | 19 | +| 9 | Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.714..... | 19 | +| 9.1 | General ..... | 19 | +| 9.2 | General characteristics of signalling connection control procedures ..... | 20 | +| 9.3 | Addressing and routing..... | 23 | +| 9.4 | Connection-oriented procedures..... | 40 | +| 9.5 | Connectionless procedures ..... | 41 | + +| | Page | | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 9.6 | SCCP management procedures ..... | 43 | +| 9.7 | Annex C – State Transition Diagrams (STD) for the signalling connection control part of Signalling Systems No. 7 ..... | 57 | +| 9.8 | Annex D – State Transition Diagrams (STD) for SCCP management control ..... | 57 | +| 10 | Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.715 ..... | 57 | +| Appendix I – | Aspects of the fully meshed Signalling Transport Network ..... | 57 | +| I.1 | GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on MTP and MTP3b ..... | 57 | +| I.2 | GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE ..... | 57 | +| I.3 | GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on SCTP ..... | 57 | +| Appendix II – | Differences between the SCCP and TI-SCCP operating over ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.1 ..... | 58 | + +# Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP) + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the adaptation of the narrow-band Signalling System No. 7 Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) for the capability to deploy the Generic Signalling Transport Service defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0. + +This Recommendation is written as a set of exceptions to ITU-T Recs Q.711, Q.712, Q.713, Q.714 and Q.715 defining the SCCP. The exceptions to certain clauses of text from the SCCP Recommendations are indicated by using revision marks. (Deleted text is shown using strikeouts, and added text is shown underlined.) + +The protocol defined by this Recommendation is the Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) protocol to be used between "Serving Nodes". This protocol is called the "Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part" (TI-SCCP). + +The scope of this Recommendation is shown in Figure 1-1. + +![Diagram illustrating the scope of the Recommendation. It shows the hierarchy from SCCP application down to various transport protocols. The top part shows SCCP application connected via SAP to TI-SCCP (this Recommendation) which connects to Generic Signalling Transport Service (Q.2150.0). Below TI-SCCP are three examples of transport converters: MTP3/MTP3b (Q.2150.1), SSCOP/SSCOPMCE (Q.2150.2), and SCTP (Q.2150.3). These connect to Message Transfer Part Level 3 (Q.2210), Service Specific Connection Oriented Protocol (Q.2110), and Stream Control Protocol Transmission (RFCs 2960 & 3309) respectively. A bracket on the right labels the bottom three protocols as 'Examples'.](1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the scope of the Recommendation. At the top, an **SCCP application** is shown. Below it, a **SAP** (Service Access Point) is indicated, with **Primitives** being exchanged between the application and the **SCCP Signalling Transport Service**. The **SCCP Signalling Transport Service** is connected to the **Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP) (this Recommendation)**, which is identified by the reference **Q.2220**. Below the TI-SCCP, three **SAP** points are shown, each with **Primitives** being exchanged. These SAPs connect to the **Generic Signalling Transport Service (Q.2150.0)**. Below the Generic Signalling Transport Service, three examples of transport converters are shown, each with **Primitives** being exchanged. These converters are: + + +- Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b (Q.2150.1)**, which connects to **Message Transfer Part Level 3 using Q.2140 (MTP3b) (Q.2210)**. +- Signalling Transport Converter on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE (Q.2150.2)**, which connects to **Service Specific Connection Oriented Protocol (SSCOP) (Q.2110)**. +- Signalling Transport Converter on SCTP (Q.2150.3)**, which connects to **Stream Control Protocol (SCTP) Transmission (RFCs 2960 & 3309)**. + + A bracket on the right side of the diagram labels these three bottom protocols as **Examples**. The diagram is identified by the reference **Q.2220\_F01-1** at the bottom right. + +Diagram illustrating the scope of the Recommendation. It shows the hierarchy from SCCP application down to various transport protocols. The top part shows SCCP application connected via SAP to TI-SCCP (this Recommendation) which connects to Generic Signalling Transport Service (Q.2150.0). Below TI-SCCP are three examples of transport converters: MTP3/MTP3b (Q.2150.1), SSCOP/SSCOPMCE (Q.2150.2), and SCTP (Q.2150.3). These connect to Message Transfer Part Level 3 (Q.2210), Service Specific Connection Oriented Protocol (Q.2110), and Stream Control Protocol Transmission (RFCs 2960 & 3309) respectively. A bracket on the right labels the bottom three protocols as 'Examples'. + +Figure 1-1/Q.2220 – Scope of this Recommendation + +# 2 References + +## 2.1 Normative references + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.711 (2001), *Functional description of the signalling connection control part*. +- [2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.712 (1996), *Definition and function of signalling connection control part messages*. +- [3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.713 (2001), *Signalling connection control part formats and codes*. +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.714 (2001), *Signalling connection control part procedures*. +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.715 (2002), *Signalling connection control part user guide*. +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.0 (2001), *Generic signalling transport service*. + +## 2.2 Informative references + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other documents contain information that may be useful to understanding the usage of this Recommendation. There are no additional provisions of this Recommendation derived from these documents. + +- [B1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.1 (2001), *Signalling transport converter on MTP3 and MTP3b*. +- [B2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.2 (2001), *Signalling transport converter on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE*. +- [B3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.3 (2002), *Signalling transport converter on SCTP*. +- [B4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2210 (1996), *Message transfer part level 3 functions and messages using the services of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2140*. +- [B5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2110 (1994), *B-ISDN ATM adaptation layer – Service specific connection oriented protocol (SSCOP)*. +- [B6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2111 (1999), *B-ISDN ATM adaptation layer – Service specific connection oriented protocol in a multi-link and connectionless environment (SSCOPMCE)*. +- [B7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.701 (1993), *Functional description of the message transfer part (MTP) of Signalling System No. 7*. +- [B8] ITU-T Recommendation Q.704 (1996), *Signalling network functions and messages*. +- [B9] ITU-T Recommendation Q.707 (1988), *Testing and maintenance*. +- [B10] IETF RFC 2960 (2000), *Stream Control Transmission Protocol*. + +# 3 Definitions + +There are no further definitions required other than those contained in the normative references (see 2.1). + +# 4 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------| +| AAL | ATM Adaptation Layer | +| AK | Data acknowledgement | +| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode | +| BICC | Bearer Independent Call Control | +| B-ISDN | Broadband-Integrated Services Digital Network | +| B-ISUP | Broadband ISDN User Part (of SS No. 7) | +| CC | Connection Confirm | +| CIC | Call Instance Code | +| CL | Congestion Level | +| CL CL | CL for connectionless services | +| CL CO | CL for connection-oriented services | +| CL mc | Congestion Level "maximum congestion" | +| CL nc | Congestion Level "no congestion" | +| CL st | Congestion Level "step" | +| CR | Connection Request | +| CREF | Connection Refused | +| DPC | Destination Point Code | +| DT1 | Data Form 1 | +| DT2 | Data Form 2 | +| EA | Expedited Data Acknowledgement | +| ED | Expedited Data | +| ERR | Protocol Data Unit Error | +| ES | Encoding Scheme | +| F | Fixed Length | +| GST | Generic Signalling Transport | +| GSTS | Generic Signalling Transport Service | +| GST-SAP | Service Access Point to the Generic Signalling Transport Service | +| GT | Global Title | +| GTAI | Global Title Address Information | +| GTI | Global Title Indicator | +| GTT | Global Title Translation | + +| | | +|-------------------|---------------------------------------------| +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| ISUP | Integrated Services User Part (of SS No. 7) | +| IT | Inactivity Test | +| IWF | Interworking Function | +| L3 | Level 3 | +| LSB | Least Significant Bit | +| LUDT | Long Unitdata | +| LUDTS | Long Unitdata Service | +| M | Mandatory | +| MSB | Most Significant Bit | +| MSG | Message | +| MTP | Message Transfer Part | +| MTP3 | Message Transfer Part level 3 (Narrow-band) | +| MTP3b | Message Transfer Part level 3 (Broadband) | +| MTP-SAP | SAP to access the services provided by MTP | +| NAI | Nature of Address Indicator | +| NI | Network Indicator | +| NNI | Network Node Interface | +| NP | Numbering Plan | +| NPCI | Network Protocol Control Information | +| NPDU | Network Protocol Data Unit | +| NSDU | Network Service Data Unit | +| NSP | Network Service Part | +| O | Optional | +| OPC | Originating Point Code | +| PC | Point Code | +| PDU | Protocol Data Unit | +| RI | Routing Indicator | +| RIL | Restricted Importance Level | +| RL | Restriction Level | +| RLC | Release Complete | +| RL CL | RL for connectionless services | +| RL CO | RL for connection-oriented services | +| RLSD | Released | +| RSC | Reset Confirm | +| RSL | Restriction Sublevel | +| RSL CL | RSL for connectionless services | + +| | | +|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| RSL CO | RSL for connection-oriented services | +| RSR | Reset Request | +| SAAL | Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer | +| SAP | Service Access Point | +| SCCP | Signalling Connection Control Part | +| SCCP-SAP | SAP to access the SCCP services | +| SCLC | SCCP Connectionless Control | +| SCMG | SCCP Management+ | +| SCOC | SCCP Connection-Oriented Control | +| SCRC | SCCP Routing Control | +| SCTP | Stream Control Transmission Protocol | +| SDU | Service Data Unit | +| SI | Service Indicator | +| SIO | Service Information Octet | +| SLC | Signalling Link Code | +| SLS | Signalling Link Selection | +| SOG | Subsystem-Out-Of-Service-Grant | +| SOR | Subsystem-Out-Of-Service-Request | +| SS | SubSystem | +| SS No. 7 | ITU-T Signalling System No. 7 | +| SSA | Subsystem-Allowed | +| SSC | Subsystem Congested | +| SSCF | Service Specific Coordination Function | +| SSCOP | Service Specific Connection-Oriented Protocol | +| SSCOPMCE | SSCOP in a multi-link or Connectionless Environment | +| SSN | SubSystem Number | +| SSP | Subsystem-Prohibited | +| SSPC | SubSystem-Prohibited Control | +| SST | Subsystem-Status-Test | +| STC | Signalling Transport Converter | +| STP | Signalling Transfer Point | +| TI-SCCP | Transport-Independent SCCP | +| TT | Translation Type | +| UDT | Unitdata | +| UDTS | Unitdata Service | +| UP | User Part (of SS No. 7) | +| V | Variable Length | + +| | | +|-------|---------------------------| +| XUDT | Extended Unitdata | +| XUDTS | Extended Unitdata Service | + +# 5 Signalling network architecture + +## 5.1 General architecture + +The general principle of the architecture of TI-SCCP is shown in Figure 5-1. It depicts a TI-SCCP with ten signalling relations, each accessed via a GST-SAP and a Signalling Transport Converter instance. Three different Signalling Transport Technologies are used with three different types of Signalling Transport Converters. + +NOTE 1 – Currently, three different types of Signalling Transport Converters are defined: + +- Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.1 [B1]); +- Signalling Transport Converter on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.2 [B2]); and +- Signalling Transport Converter on SCTP (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.3 [B3]). + +A message to be transmitted is passed with a TRANSFER.request primitive (see 6.7) via a particular GST-SAP to a Signalling Transport Converter (STC) instance. The GST-SAP is associated with a particular signalling relation. The STC entity forwards the message to its peer. + +The STC instance of a certain type operates over a specific Signalling Transport Technology and is configured to transport data to a single destination STC. + +Upon receipt of a message, the STC entity at the destination passes the message with a TRANSFER.indication primitive via a particular GST-SAP to the TI-SCCP. This SAP identifies to the TI-SCCP the signalling relation to the TI-SCCP and, thus, identifies also the origin of the message. + +![Diagram of TI-SCCP architecture showing 10 STC instances connected to a central TI-SCCP via GST-SAPs. The STCs are grouped by type (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3) and further grouped by Signalling Transport Technology (A, B, C). Each STC is connected to a specific technology cloud via a Trsp. SAP.](fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture of a TI-SCCP. At the top is a large rectangle labeled 'TI-SCCP'. Below it, there are ten vertical lines, each representing a signalling relation. Each line has a 'GST SAP' label and connects to a square box labeled 'STC' followed by its type: 'Type 1', 'Type 2', or 'Type 3'. There are three 'Type 1' STCs, three 'Type 2' STCs, and four 'Type 3' STCs. Below each STC box is another 'Trsp. SAP' label, which connects to a cloud at the bottom. The clouds are labeled 'Signalling Transport Technology A', 'Signalling Transport Technology B', and 'Signalling Transport Technology C'. The connections are as follows: + + +- Three 'Type 1' STCs connect to 'Signalling Transport Technology A'. +- Three 'Type 2' STCs connect to 'Signalling Transport Technology B'. +- Four 'Type 3' STCs connect to 'Signalling Transport Technology C'. + +Diagram of TI-SCCP architecture showing 10 STC instances connected to a central TI-SCCP via GST-SAPs. The STCs are grouped by type (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3) and further grouped by Signalling Transport Technology (A, B, C). Each STC is connected to a specific technology cloud via a Trsp. SAP. + +Q.2220\_F05-1 + +**Figure 5-1/Q.2220 – Selecting a SAP to a Signalling Transport Converter entity to reach a destination independent of the Signalling Transport Technology** + +The status primitives, i.e., START-INFO.indication, IN-SERVICE.indication, OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication, and CONGESTION.indication, are also passed via a specific GST-SAP and, thus, by that indicate which signalling relation indicated its status. + +The signalling transport network from the point of view of a TI-SCCP is a fully meshed network (see Appendix I). + +NOTE 2 – Traditional SCCP networks are fully meshed via the relaying mechanism at the MTP3 layer. + +Figure 5-2 shows an application of this principle by depicting a signalling network that deploys two Signalling Transport Technologies. This signalling network is fully meshed, i.e., 10 signalling relations are used. TI-SCCP "E" is attached to STCs of a single type, i.e., this TI-SCCP can be reached only by utilizing a particular Signalling Transport Technology; the other TI-SCCPs can be reached by either Signalling Transport Technology. + +![Diagram of a fully meshed signalling network with two transport technologies.](4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a signalling network with five TI-SCCP entities (A, B, C, D, E) at the top. Each TI-SCCP is connected to one or more STC (Signalling Transport Converter) entities below it. TI-SCCP A, B, C, and D are each connected to an STC Type 1 and an STC Type 2. TI-SCCP E is connected only to an STC Type 2. Below the STCs are two large ovals representing 'Signalling Transport Technology A' and 'Signalling Transport Technology B'. Dashed lines show connections from the STCs to these transport technologies. STCs Type 1 and 2 for TI-SCCPs A, B, C, and D have connections to both transport technologies. STC Type 2 for TI-SCCP E has a connection only to Signalling Transport Technology B. A label 'Q.2220\_F05-2' is in the bottom right corner. + +Diagram of a fully meshed signalling network with two transport technologies. + +Figure 5-2/Q.2220 – Selecting a SAP to a Signalling Transport Converter entity to reach a destination independent of the Signalling Transport Technology + +## 5.2 Interworking of TI-SCCP with SCCP + +Figure 5-3 shows the interworking scenario. + +![Diagram showing interworking between a New Technology based Signalling Network and an MTP3 or MTP3b Signalling Network.](410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two network domains separated by a central 'SCCP IWF' (Interworking Function). On the left, the 'New Technology based Signalling Network' contains five TI-SCCP entities (A, B, C, D, E) in a mesh. TI-SCCP C is connected to the SCCP IWF. On the right, the 'MTP3 or MTP3b Signalling Network' contains five SCCP entities (F, G, H, I, J) in a mesh. SCCP F is connected to the SCCP IWF. Below the main diagram, a detailed view of the interworking point shows a 'GST' (Gateway Signalling Transport) block connected to a 'TI-SCCP' block on the left, and an 'MTP3' block connected to an 'SCCP' block on the right. Both are connected to a central 'IWF' block. A label 'Q.2220\_F05-3' is in the bottom right corner. + +Diagram showing interworking between a New Technology based Signalling Network and an MTP3 or MTP3b Signalling Network. + +Figure 5-3/Q.2220 – Scenario for interworking between TI-SCCP and SCCP + +NOTE – The interworking function ("SCCP IWF") may be collocated with TI-SCCP "C", or SCCP "F", or both. + +### **5.2.1 Messages travelling from an SCCP network towards a TI-SCCP network** + +Messages arriving from an SCCP node get delivered to the SCCP IWF by an MTP-TRANSFER.indication primitive. The parameter quadruple "OPC, DCP, SI, NI" indicates the signalling relation. In addition, an SLS value is indicated. + +At the SCCP IWF the following actions are performed: + +- 1) A UDT message is converted into an XUDT or LUDT message; +NOTE – A UDTS message is never received. +- 2) A sequence control parameter is appended to XUDT, XUDTS, LUDT, and LUDTS messages; +- 3) A regular Global Translation (see 2.4/Q.714 in 9.3/Q.2220) is required as the message enters another signalling network with its own SPC domain; +- 4) The SLS value is put into the sequence control parameter of the XUDT, XUDTS, LUDT, and LUDTS messages (see 3/Q.713 and 4/Q.713 in 8.3/Q.2220 and 8.4/Q.2220); and +- 5) The message is transmitted with the TRANSMIT.request primitive via the appropriate GST-SAP. + +### **5.2.2 Messages travelling from a TI-SCCP network towards an SCCP network** + +A TRANSFER.indication primitive via a GST-SAP delivers messages arriving from a TI-SCCP node to the SCCP IWF. The identity of the GST-SAP indicates the signalling relation. + +At the SCCP IWF the following actions are performed: + +- 1) A regular Global Translation (see 2.4/Q.714 in 9.3) is required as the message enters another signalling network with its own SPC domain; and +- 2) The message is transmitted with the MTP-TRANSMIT.request primitive together with the parameters taken from the result of the Global Translation and the SLS value removed. + +# **6 Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.711** + +The specifications in ITU-T Rec. Q.711 apply with the following exceptions: + +## **6.1 General** + +The SCCP defined in ITU-T Recs Q.711 to Q.716 are based on the MTP3 signalling transport service whereas the Transport-Independent SCCP defined in this Recommendation is based on the Generic Signalling Transport Service (GSTS) defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0; hence: + +- a) Any reference – in the text of the whole Recommendation – to the service or lower boundary conditions including references to ITU-T Recs Q.701 to Q.707, and/or in ITU-T Rec. Q.2210 shall be replaced with a reference to ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0. +- b) Any reference to "MTP" is replaced by a reference to "GST", the Generic Signalling Transport. + +NOTE – This includes figures such as Figures 1/Q.711 and 2/Q.711. + +- c) Any reference to "MTP-SAP" is replaced by a reference to "GST-SAP", the Service Access Point to the Generic Signalling Transport Service. + +Further specific exceptions are specified in the following subclauses. + +## 6.2 Scope and field of application + +Replace the 5th paragraph in clause 1/Q.711 with: + +<<<<<<<<----- +The SCCP making use of the services of the ~~GST-MTP~~, as specified in ITU-T Rec. ~~Q.2150.0~~ ~~Q.2210~~, provides the connectionless network service as specified in this Recommendation. A connection-oriented network service can only use the services which are common to ITU-T Recs ~~Q.2150.0-Q.2210~~ and Q.704 for the MTP. In particular, the connection-oriented network service shall use a maximum PDU length that does not exceed 272 octets minus the size of the MTP label. +----->>>>>>>> + +After the last paragraph and Figure 1/Q.711 in clause 1/Q.711 add the following paragraph and Note: + +<<<<<<----- +The Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) signalling is independent of the underlying transport protocols by utilizing the Generic Signalling Transport Service (GSTS). Functions of the SCCP are however used for the transfer of ISUP Supplementary Services for BICC that are based on the Transaction Capability of Signalling System No. 7. + +NOTE – The Transaction Capability of SS No. 7 itself is based on the services of SCCP. + +## 6.3 Primitives + +Replace Figure 3/Q.711 with the following figure: + +![Diagram showing service primitives between Upper layers, SCCP-SAP, Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP), GST-SAP, and Generic Signalling Transport.](c67d21fb3d9042e88cdc669f071b4e7c_img.jpg) + +<<<<<<----- + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between network layers and their service primitives. At the top is a box labeled 'Upper layers'. Below it is a box labeled 'Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP)'. At the bottom is a box labeled 'Generic Signalling Transport'. Between the top and middle boxes is a diamond-shaped interface labeled 'SCCP-SAP' on the left and 'Services of the SCCP' on the right. A double-headed vertical arrow between the top box and this interface is labeled 'N-service primitives'. Between the middle and bottom boxes is another diamond-shaped interface labeled 'GST-SAP' on the left and 'Services of the Generic Signalling Transport' on the right. A double-headed vertical arrow between the middle box and this interface is labeled 'Generic Signalling Transport Services primitives'. + +Diagram showing service primitives between Upper layers, SCCP-SAP, Transport-Independent Signalling Connection Control Part (TI-SCCP), GST-SAP, and Generic Signalling Transport. + +Q.2220\_F06-1(6.3) + +**Figure 6-1/Q.2220 – Service primitives** + +----->>>>>>>> + +## 6.4 Removal of the embedded service + +In 6.1.1.1.1/Q.711, replace the 5th paragraph with the two bullet items and the 6th paragraph with the following: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +For connection establishment there ~~exists an~~ are two alternative boundaries between SCCP and SCCP user with different procedures: + +- the "X.213-like" boundary that is described further in 6.1.1.2, +- the "ISUP-embedded" boundary that is described further in 6.1.1.3. + +The "X.213-like" boundary that requires that establishment procedures are performed by SCCP while in the case of "ISUP-embedded" boundary the ISUP provides the routing of the request for the set-up of a connection section. + +NOTE – The "ISUP-embedded" boundary is not supported. + +----->>>>>>>> + +Remove 6.1.1.3/Q.711 completely, including Tables 7/Q.711, 8/Q.711, and 9/Q.711. + +## 6.5 Reason for return + +Replace the 6th bullet item in the second paragraph of 6.2.2.2.4/Q.711 with: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +- GST out of service MTP failure; + +----->>>>>>>> + +## 6.6 SCCP management + +In Table 14/Q.711, replace the last row with the following: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +| | | | +|-----------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| N-PCSTATE | Indication | Affected signalling point (together with the GST MTP-SAP instance)
Signalling point status
Restricted importance level
Remote SCCP status
Affected SCCP service | +|-----------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +----->>>>>>>> + +Add the following new subclause: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +### 6.3.2.2.8 Affected SCCP service + +The optional parameter "Affected SCCP service" indicates which of the SCCP services are affected by the restriction of traffic indicated in the "Restricted importance level" parameter. + +"Affected SCCP service" may assume the following values: + +- SCCP connectionless and connection-oriented services; +- SCCP connectionless service; +- SCCP connection-oriented service. + +When this parameter is not provided, it is assumed that both connectionless and connection-oriented services are affected. + +In Table 17/Q.711, add as a new penultimate row (before the Notes) the following: + +| | | +|-----------------------|---| +| Affected SCCP service | O | +|-----------------------|---| + +In Table 17/Q.711, replace the last row (notes) with the following: + +| | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| c5) | Present if this is the result of an MTP-STATUS reporting user part unavailability or the reception of an SSC message reporting a change of restricted importance level, or a time-out (T con ) to detect the abatement of SCCP congestion. | +| c6) | Present if this is the result of a change in the restricted importance level of the affected signalling point or remote SCCP. | + +**6.7 Definition of the lower boundary of the SCCP** + +Replace clause 7/Q.711 with: + +**7 Definition of the lower boundary of the SCCP** + +The Generic Signalling Transport Service is specified in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0. For convenience, a summary of the primitives for accessing the service is reproduced in Table 7-1/Q.2220. In the event of any difference between this table and the definitions in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0, the definitions in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0 take precedence. + +**ITU-T Rec. Q.2220 (12/2002)** 11 + +**Table 7-1/Q.2220 – Primitives and parameters of the Generic Signalling Transport Sublayer** + +| Primitive generic name | Type | | | | +|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|----------|---------| +| | Request | Indication | Response | Confirm | +| START-INFO | – | Max_Length
CIC_Control | – | – | +| IN-SERVICE | – | Level | – | – | +| OUT-OF-SERVICE | – | (Note 1) | – | – | +| CONGESTION | – | Level | – | – | +| TRANSFER | Sequence Control
STC User Data
Priority (Note 2) | STC User Data
Priority (Note 2) | – | – | + +– This primitive is not defined. +NOTE 1 – This primitive has no parameters. +NOTE 2 – This parameter is a national option. + +On the establishment of a Signalling Transport Converter entity and the associated Signalling Transport Converter user entity, for example at power up, the initial conditions are the same as if an OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication primitive had been conveyed across the SAP. Also at this time the START-INFO.indication is sent to the TI-SCCP. + +NOTE – The procedures for the primitives IN-SERVICE.indication, OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication, and CONGESTION.indication are specified for traffic limitations (see 2.6/Q.714 in 9.3/Q.2220), for connectionless data transfer (see 4.1/Q.714 in 9.5/Q.2220), and for SCCP management (see clause 5/Q.714 in 9.6/Q.2220). The procedures for the primitives TRANSFER.request and TRANSFER.indication are specified for the data transfer between peer TI-SCCP entities (in 1.5/Q.714 in 9.2/Q.2220). The "STC User Data" parameter in these primitives carry a complete message (message formats are specified in clauses 4 and 5/Q.713 in 8/Q.2220); the "sequence control" parameter conveys the SLS value to allow the lower layers to perform signalling link selection (in 1.5/Q.714 in 9.2/Q.2220). + +# 7 Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.712 + +The specifications in ITU-T Rec. Q.712 apply with the following exceptions: + +## 7.1 Signalling connection control part messages + +*Replace the specification labelled "1.25" with:* + +**1.25 long unitdata (LUDT):** A *Long Unitdata* message is used by the SCCP to send data (along with optional parameters) in a connectionless mode. When the maximum length indication from the Generic Signalling Transport permits, MTP capabilities according to Recommendation Q.2210 are present, it allows sending of NSDU sizes up to 3952 octets without segmentation. + +It is used in Connectionless protocol classes 0 and 1. + +## 7.2 SCCP message parameters + +Replace the specification labelled "2.20" with: + +<<<<<<<<----->>>>>>>> +**2.20 segmentation:** The "segmentation" parameter field is used in the XUDT, XUDTS, LUDT and LUDTS messages to indicate that a SCCP message has been segmented, or, in case of the LUDT(S), that it may undergo segmenting at an ~~MTP/MTP 3b interworking node~~ between the Generic Signalling Transport and an MTP3-based signalling transport. The parameter also contains all the information necessary to allow the correct reassembly of the message. + +Replace the specification labelled "2.22" with: + +<<<<<<<<----->>>>>>>> +**2.22 congestion level:** The "SCCP congestion level" parameter is included in the *Subsystem Congested* message (SSC) to report the severity of the congestion referring to either the whole SCCP node or to the local SCCP. When local SCCP congestion is reported, the "Affected SCCP service" field in the congestion level parameter indicates whether the reported congestion level affects SCCP connectionless, connection-oriented or both services. + +Replace the specification labelled "2.23" with: + +<<<<<<<<----->>>>>>>> +**2.23 long data:** The "long data" parameter is a "data" parameter with a two octet length indicator. It allows sending of up to ~~3968~~ 3952 octets in a single LUDT or LUDTS message when the maximum length indication from the Generic Signalling Transport permits sending of NSDU sizes up to 3968 octets ~~MTP 3b capabilities are present~~. + +## 7.3 Inclusion of fields in the messages + +In Table 1/Q.712, replace note b) at the bottom of the table with: + +<<<<<<<<----->>>>>>>> +b) The segmentation parameter must be included by the originating node, if interworking between the Generic Signalling Transport and an MTP3-based signalling transport ~~MTP/MTP 3b interworking~~ is expected. + +# 8 Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.713 + +The specifications in ITU-T Rec. Q.713 apply with the following exceptions: + +## 8.1 Introduction + +Replace the text in clause 1/Q.713 "General" with: + +<<<<<<<<----->>>>>>>> +This Recommendation specifies the SCCP messages formats and codes for the support of connection-oriented services, connectionless services and the management of SCCP. + +The SCCP messages are passed between SCCP and GSTMTP across the GSTMTP-SAP by means of the STC user data parameter of the MTP-TRANSFER request or indication primitives as appropriate (see Table 6-1/Q.2150.0-1/Q.701). + +~~NOTE The MTP TRANSFER primitive, in addition to the user data parameter, contains four parameters with the contents as follows (see Table 1/Q.701):~~ + +- ~~• the contents of the OPC consisting of information equivalent to 14 bits, to be conveyed in the standard routing label of the MTP;~~ +- ~~• the contents of the DPC consisting of information equivalent to 14 bits, to be conveyed in the standard routing label of the MTP;~~ +- ~~• the contents of the SLS consisting of information equivalent to 4 bits. If the MTP service "in-sequence delivery" of SDUs is a requirement, SCCP shall use the same SLS value for all SDUs with the same sequence control and called address parameters;~~ +- ~~• information equivalent to the contents of the SIO. For SCCP, the encoding for the service indicator is 0011 binary (see Q.704 § 14.2.1)~~ + +A SCCP message consists of the following parts (see Figure 1/Q.713): + +- the message type code; +- the mandatory fixed part; +- the mandatory variable part; +- the optional part, which may contain fixed length and variable length fields. + +The description of the various parts is contained in the following clauses. SCCP management messages and codes are provided in clause 5. + +----->>>>>>>> +*Replace Figure 1/Q.713 with the following figure:* + <<<<<<<<----- + +![](e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg) + +| | | +|-------------------------|----------------| +| Message type code | } SCCP message | +| Mandatory fixed part | | +| Mandatory variable part | | +| Optional part | | + +Q.2220\_F08-1 + +**Figure 8-1/Q.2220 – General layout** + +Replace Figure 2/Q.713 with the following figure: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +![Diagram of General SCCP message format showing octet order and field structure.](c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the General SCCP message format. It shows the order of octets (8 to 1) and the structure of the message fields, categorized into Mandatory fixed part, Mandatory variable part, and Optional part. + +| Order of octets | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|-------------------------| +| | Message type code | | | | | | | | | +| | Mandatory fixed length parameter A | | | | | | | | Mandatory fixed part | +| | Mandatory fixed length parameter F | | | | | | | | | +| | Pointer to parameter M | | | | | | | | Mandatory variable part | +| | Pointer to parameter P | | | | | | | | | +| | Pointer to start of optional part | | | | | | | | | +| | Length indicator of parameter M | | | | | | | | | +| | Mandatory variable length parameter M | | | | | | | | | +| | Length indicator of parameter P | | | | | | | | | +| | Mandatory variable length parameter P | | | | | | | | | +| | Parameter name = X | | | | | | | | | +| | Length indicator of parameter X | | | | | | | | Optional part | +| | Optional parameter X | | | | | | | | | +| | Parameter name = Z | | | | | | | | | +| | Length indicator of parameter Z | | | | | | | | | +| | Optional parameter Z | | | | | | | | | +| | End of optional parameters | | | | | | | | | + +Notes: Arrows on the left indicate that 'Pointer to parameter M', 'Pointer to parameter P', and 'Pointer to start of optional part' point to the corresponding length indicators and parameter blocks. Dotted vertical lines separate octets 5 and 6 in several fields. + +Diagram of General SCCP message format showing octet order and field structure. + +Q.2220\_F08-2 + +**Figure 8-2/Q.2220 – General SCCP message format** + +----->>>>>>>> + +*Remove footnote 1 from the 2nd paragraph of 1.4/Q.713 and insert the Note in the mainline text as follows:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +A pointer is also included to indicate the beginning of the optional part. If the message type indicates that no optional part is allowed, then this pointer will not be present. If the message type indicates that an optional part is possible, but there is no optional part included in this particular message, then a pointer field containing all zeros will be used. + +NOTE – There are currently messages (RSR and ERR) containing one pointer to the beginning of the optional part although no optional parameters are currently defined for them. + +----->>>>>>>> + +## 8.2 Coding of the general parts + +*Modify Table 2/Q.713 as follows:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +**Table 2/Q.713 – SCCP parameter name codes** + +| Parameter name | Clauses | Parameter name code
8765 4321 | +|--------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| End of optional parameters | 3.1 | 0000 0000 | +| Importance | 3.19 | 0001 0010 | +| Long data | 3.20 | 0001 0011 | +| Sequence control | 3.21 | 0001 0100 | +| Reserved for International Use | {
{
{
} | 0001 0100
0001 0101
to
1111 0011 | +| Reserved for National Networks | {
{
{
} | 1111 0100
to
1111 1110 | +| Reserved | | 1111 1111 | + +----->>>>>>>> + +*Remove footnote 2 from the first paragraph of 2.3/Q.713 and insert the Note in the mainline text as follows:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +The pointer value (in binary) gives the number of octets between the most significant octet of the pointer itself (included) and the first octet (not included) of the parameter associated with that pointer2 as shown in the following diagram. + +NOTE – For example, a pointer value of "00000001" indicates that the associated parameter begins in the octet immediately following the most significant octet of the pointer. A pointer value of "00001010" indicates that ten octets of information exist between the most significant octet of the pointer octet (included) and the first octet of the parameter associated with that pointer (not included). A two-octet pointer value of "00000000 00001010" indicates that ten octets of information exist between the most significant octet of the pointer (included) and the first octet of the parameter associated with that pointer (not included). + +## ----->>>>>>>> **8.3 SCCP parameters** + +*Remove footnote 3 from the entry of bit coding "00000010" of 3.14/Q.713 and insert the Note in the mainline text as follows:* + +<<<<<<<----- + +Bits + +8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 + +• • • + +0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0            point code mismatch3 (see Note) + +• • • + +NOTE – National option (see Table B.2/Q.714). + +----->>>>>>>> + +*Add the following new clause after 3.20/Q.713:* + +<<<<<<<----- + +## **3.21 Sequence control** + +The "sequence control" parameter field is a one-octet field containing the signalling link selection value. + +----->>>>>>>> + +## **8.4 SCCP messages and codes** + +*Replace 4.18/Q.713 and 4.20/Q.713 with the following:* + +<<<<<<<----- + +## **4.18 Extended unitdata (XUDT)** + +The XUDT message contains: + +- four pointers; +- the parameters indicated in Table 19. + + + +## 8.5 SCCP management messages and codes + +Replace Figure 13/Q.713 with the following figure: + +![](552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg) + +<<<<<<<<----- + +| | | | | | | | | +|-------|---|------------------------------|---|-----------------------|---|---|---| +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +| Spare | | Affected SCCP service | | SCCP congestion level | | | | + +**Figure 13/Q.713 – SCCP congestion level format** + +----->>>>>>>> + +At the end of 5.2.4/Q.713, add the following paragraph: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +Bits 6-5 indicate which SCCP services are affected by the congestion level, and is coded as follows: + +| Bits | | +|------|------------------------------------------------------| +| 6 | 5 | +| 0 0 | SCCP connectionless and connection-oriented services | +| 0 1 | SCCP connectionless service | +| 1 0 | SCCP connection-oriented service | +| 1 1 | Reserved | + +----->>>>>>>> + +## 8.6 Mapping for cause parameter values + +In Table A.2/Q.713, replace the entry with code "00001010" with the following row: + +<<<<<<<<----- + +| RLSD Message | | N-DISCONNECT primitive | | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Code | Release cause | Reason | Originator | +| 00001010 | GST out of service
MTP failure | disconnection – abnormal condition of non-transient nature | NSP | + +----->>>>>>>> + +# 9 Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.714 + +The specifications in ITU-T Rec. Q.714 apply with the following exceptions: + +## 9.1 General + +The SCCP defined in ITU-T Recs Q.711 to Q.716 are based on the MTP3 signalling transport service whereas the Transport-Independent SCCP defined in this Recommendation is based on the Generic Signalling Transport Service (GSTS) defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0; hence: + +- Any reference – in the text of the whole Recommendation – to the service or lower boundary conditions including references to ITU-T Recs Q.701 to Q.707, and/or in ITU-T Rec. Q.2210 shall be replaced with a reference to ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.0. +- Any reference to "MTP" is replaced by a reference to "GST", the Generic Signalling Transport. + +- c) Any reference to "MTP-SAP" is replaced by a reference to "GST-SAP", the Service Access Point to the Generic Signalling Transport Service. + +Further specific exceptions are specified in the following subclauses. + +## 9.2 General characteristics of signalling connection control procedures + +*In 1.1.2/Q.714, replace the 2nd and 3rd paragraph after the bullet list with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +When one connectionless message is not sufficient to convey the user data contained in one NSDU making use of GST MTP-services provided by an GST MTP-SAP that supports a maximum MTP SDU size of 272 octets (including the MTP routing label), a segmenting/reassembly function for protocol classes 0 and 1 is provided. In this case, the TI-SCCP at the originating node or in a relay node provides segmentation of the information into multiple segments prior to transfer in the "data" field of XUDT (or as a network option LUDT) messages. At the destination node, the NSDU is reassembled. + +If it is certain that only GST MTP-services that support maximum PDU length of 4096 or longer according to ITU-T Recommendation Q.2210 are used in the network, then no segmentation information is needed. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 1.1.2.2/Q.714, replace the single paragraph with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +In protocol class 1, the features of class 0 are complemented by an additional feature (i.e. the sequence control parameter contained in the N-UNITDATA request primitive) which allows the higher layer to indicate to the SCCP that a given stream of NSDUs shall be delivered in-sequence. The Sequence Control Signalling Link Selection (SLS) parameter in the MTP-TRANSFER request primitive is chosen by the originating SCCP based on the value of the sequence control parameter. The Sequence Control parameter SLS shall be identical for a stream of NSDUs with the same sequence control parameter. + +NOTE – If the GST supports only a single signalling link, e.g., when based on SSCOP (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.2), the sequence of NSDUs is always maintained. On the other hand, if the GST supports multiple signalling links (or streams), e.g., when based on MTP (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.1) or SCTP (see ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.3), the MTP then encodes the Signalling Link Selection (SLS) field in the routing label of MTP messages relating to such NSDUs, so that their sequence of NSDUs is, under normal conditions, maintained by the GST MTP and SCCP. + +With the above constraints, the SCCP and GST MTP together ensure in-sequence delivery to the user. Thus, this protocol class corresponds to an enhanced connectionless service, where an additional in-sequence delivery feature is included. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 1.2.1/Q.714, replace the 1st paragraph with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +When the SCCP functions at the originating node receive a request to establish a signalling connection, the "called address" is analysed to identify the node towards which a signalling connection section should be established. If the node is not the same, the SCCP forwards a CR message to that node using the appropriate GST-SAP instance MTP routing functions. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 1.2.1/Q.714, replace the 2nd bullet item in numbered list item b) with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +- If a coupling of connection sections is not required in this node, then no incoming or outgoing connection section is established. A CR message is forwarded towards the next node using the appropriate GST-SAP instance ~~MTP routing functions~~. + +----->>>>>>>> + +*In 1.3.1/Q.714, replace the single paragraph with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +When the SCCP functions at the originating node receive from an SCCP user an NSDU to be transferred by the protocol class 0 or 1 connectionless service, the "called address" and other relevant parameters, if required, are analysed to identify the node towards which the message should be sent. The NSDU is then included as the "data" parameter in an XUDT, LUDT or UDT message, which is sent towards that node using appropriate GST-SAP instance ~~the MTP routing functions~~. If the network structure is such that both LUDT(S) and (X)UDT(S) messages may apply, then the routing may transmit a message other than LUDT(S) (see 2.5). Upon receipt of the XUDT, LUDT or UDT message, the SCCP functions at that node perform the routing analysis as described in clause 2 and, if the destination of the XUDT, LUDT or UDT message is a local user, deliver the NSDU to the local higher layer functions. If the destination of the XUDT, LUDT or UDT message is not at that node, then the XUDT, LUDT or UDT message is forwarded to the next node after a possible change of the type of message (see 2.5). This process continues until the destination is reached. + +----->>>>>>>> + +Replace Figure 1/Q.714 with the following figure: + +--- + +![Figure 9-1/Q.2220 – SCCP overview](abc0eb594f9d2c0daa0e60df05f2a666_img.jpg) + +Detailed description of Figure 9-1: The diagram illustrates the SCCP architecture and its interactions. On the left, the 'SCCP user' interacts with SCCP sub-blocks via primitives like N-CONNECT, N-DATA, N-UNITDATA, and N-COORD. The central 'SCCP' block is divided into four functional areas: SCOC (connection-oriented control), SCLC (connectionless control), SCRC (routing control), and SCMG (management). SCOC and SCLC exchange 'CO message' and 'CL message' respectively with SCRC. SCRC also handles 'Routing failure' feedback. SCMG interacts with SCOC, SCLC, and SCRC via internal signals like SSC, SOR, SOG, SSA, SSP, and SST. On the right, the 'GST' (Generic Signaling Transport) interacts with SCRC via GST-TRANSFER.indication and GST-TRANSFER.request, and with SCMG via status indications like START-INFO, IN-SERVICE, OUT-OF-SERVICE, and CONGESTION. + +**Figure 9-1/Q.2220 – SCCP overview** + +Q.2220\_F09-1 + +Figure 9-1/Q.2220 – SCCP overview + +--- + +Add a new clause after Figure 1/Q.714 as follows: + +--- + +### 1.5 Procedures for the use of the TRANSFER primitives + +#### 1.5.1 TRANSFER.request primitive + +The TRANSFER.request primitive is used by the SCRC to transfer messages to peer SCCP entities. The particular GST-SAP via which the primitive is issued determines the destination SCCP (DPC). + NOTE 1 – The quadruplet "DPC OPC SI NI" characterizes each GST entity. + +22 ITU-T Rec. Q.2220 (12/2002) + +The parameters are used as follows: + a) The "STC User Data" parameter shall contain the message to be transferred. + b) The "Sequence Control" parameter shall contain the SLS value. + +NOTE 2 – The SLS value is also transferred within the XUDT and LUDT messages to the peer (see clauses 1, 4, and clause 5/Q.713 in clause 8/Q.2220). + +**1.5.2 TRANSFER.indication primitive** + +The TRANSFER.indication primitive is used by the SCRC to receive messages from peer SCCP entities. The particular GST-SAP via which the primitive is received determines the originating SCCP (OPC). + +NOTE – The quadruplet "DPC OPC SI NI" characterizes each GST entity. + +The parameter is used as follows: The "STC User Data" parameter contains the message received. + +**9.3 Addressing and routing** + +*Replace clause 2/Q.714 with the following:* + +**2 *Addressing and routing*** + +**2.1 *SCCP addressing principles*** + +The "called and calling addresses" and the "called and calling party addresses" normally contain the information necessary, but not always sufficient, for the SCCP to determine an originating and destination node. + +In the case of the connectionless procedures, the addresses are normally the originating and destination nodes of the message. + +In the case of the connection-oriented procedures, the addresses are normally the originating and destination nodes of the signalling connection section. However, the called party address of a CR message identifies the destination node and the calling party address of the CR message may identify the originating node of the signalling connection (see 2.7 for more detail on calling party addresses). + +For the transfer of the CR message or connectionless messages, two basic categories of addresses are distinguished by the SCCP, addresses requiring translation and addresses requiring no translation: + +- 1) When a translation is required, then a Global Title shall be present. A global title is an address, such as dialled-digits, which does not explicitly contain information that would allow routing in the signalling network, that is, the translation function of the SCCP is required. This translation function and its associated data are assumed to be part of the SCCP node. Access to an external database during invocation of this function is not specified and is for further study. +- 2) When a translation is not required, then the DPC + SSN shall be present. A Destination Point Code and Subsystem Number allows direct routing by the SCCP ~~and MTP~~, that is, the translation function of the SCCP is not required. + +If a reply, a message return, or segmentation in connectionless mode is required, then the "calling party address" ~~plus the OPC in the MTP routing label~~ shall contain sufficient information (together with the identity of the incoming GST~~MTP~~-SAP instance) to uniquely identify the originator of the message. + +**ITU-T Rec. Q.2220 (12/2002)**     23 + +## 2.2 SCCP routing principles + +The SCCP routing control (SCRC) receives messages from an GSTMTP-SAP instance for routing, after they have been received by the GSTMTP from another node in the signalling network. SCRC also receives internal messages from SCCP connection-oriented control (SCOC) or from SCCP connectionless control (SCLC) and performs any necessary routing functions (e.g., address translation) before passing them to the selected GSTMTP-SAP instance for transport in the signalling network or back to the SCCP connection-oriented, or SCCP connectionless control. + +The routing functions consist of: + +- 1) determining a SCCP node towards which the message is allowed to be sent; +- 2) performing the compatibility test; +- 3) providing a traffic limitation mechanism. + +### 2.2.1 Receipt of SCCP message transferred by the GSTMTP + +A message transferred by the GSTMTP that requires routing will include the "called party address" parameter giving information for routing the message. The messages which require to invoke a routing function are the CR message and all types of connectionless messages. All connection-oriented messages except the CR message are passed directly to SCOC. + +NOTE – Only the SPC in tThe called party address in the CREF or CC messages shall ~~not~~ be used for routing. + +If the "called party address" parameter is used for routing, then the routing indicator determines whether routing is based on: + +- 1) Subsystem Number (SSN) – This indicates that the receiving SCCP is the destination node of the message. The SSN is used to determine the local subsystem. +- 2) Global Title (GT) – This indicates that translation is required. Translation of the Global Title results normally in a Destination Point Code (DPC) and an internal identification of the GSTMTP-SAP instance to which the GSTMTP-TRANSFER primitive shall be issued for routing the message, the routing indicator and possibly a new SSN or GT or both. The SCCP routing function also provides additional information needed for the GSTMTP-TRANSFER primitive (e.g., Sequence Control ~~OPC, SLS and SIO; this information is passed to the MTP in the form of parameters in the MTP TRANSFER request primitive~~). + +The Even if an SPC is present in the "called party address" parameter it shall not be used by SCRC. + +### 2.2.2 Messages passed from connection-oriented or connectionless control to SCCP routing control + +Addressing information, indicating the destination of the message, is provided in every internal message the SCCP routing control receives from connection-oriented or connectionless control. + +For XUDT, LUDT or UDT messages, this addressing information is obtained from the "called address" parameter contained in the N-UNITDATA.request primitive. + +For CR messages received by SCCP routing, the addressing information is obtained from the "Called address" parameter contained in the N-CONNECT.request primitive or from the addressing information contained in the received CR message and made available to SCOC (the latter case refers to relay node with coupling). + +For connection-oriented messages other than a CR message, the addressing information is that associated with the connection section over which the message is to be sent. + +The addressing information can take the following forms: + +- 1) ~~DPC~~ + GSTMTP-SAP instance; +- 2) ~~DPC~~ + GSTMTP-SAP instance + one of the following cases: + +- a) SSN different from zero; + - b) GT or GT + SSN equal to zero; + - c) GT + SSN different from zero; + - d) SSN equal to zero. +- 3) GT with or without SSN. + +The first form applies to connection-oriented messages except the CR message. The last two forms apply to connectionless messages and to the CR message. + +#### 2.2.2.1 DPC present + +If the DPC is present in the addressing information and the DPC is not the node itself, then the message is passed to the selected GSTMTP-SAP instance using the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive with addressing information as follows: + +- 1) if no other addressing information is available (case 1 of 2.2.2), the ~~no-~~"called party address" shall contain only the DPC is provided in the message; +- 2) if a non-zero SSN is present but not the GT (case 2 a) of 2.2.2), then the called party address provided shall contain this SSN together with the DPC and the routing indicator shall be set to "Route on SSN"; +- 3) if the GT is present but no SSN or a zero SSN is present (case 2 b) of 2.2.2), then the DPC identifies where the global title translation occurs. The called party address provided shall contain this GT together with the DPC and the routing indicator shall be set to "Route on GT"; +- 4) if a non-zero SSN and the GT are both present (case 2 c) of 2.2.2), then the called party provided shall contain both the SSN and the GT as well as the DPC. The Routing Indicator could be set to either "Route on GT" or "Route on SSN". The mechanism for the selection of the Routing Indicator is outside the scope of this Recommendation; +- 5) if an SSN equal to zero is present but not a GT (case 2 d) of 2.2.2), then the address information is incomplete and the message shall be discarded. This abnormality is similar to the one described in 3.8.3.3, item 1) b6. + +If the DPC is the node itself, and: + +- 1) if a non-zero SSN is present but not the GT (case 2 a) of 2.2.2), then the message is passed based on the message type to either connection-oriented control or connectionless control and based on the availability of the subsystem; +- 2) if the GT is present but no SSN or a zero SSN is present (case 2 b) of 2.2.2), then the message is passed to the translation function; +- 3) if a non-zero SSN and the GT are both present (case 2 c) of 2.2.2) then it is an implementation-dependent matter whether or not the message is passed to the translation function; +- 4) if an SSN equal to zero is present but not a GT (case 2 d) of 2.2.2), then the address information is incomplete and the message shall be discarded. This abnormality is similar to the one described in 3.8.3.3, item 1) b6. + +#### 2.2.2.2 DPC not present + +If the DPC is not present, (case 3 of 2.2.2), then a global title translation is required before the message can be sent out. Translation results in a DPC and possibly a new SSN or new GT or both. If the GT and/or SSN resulting from a global title translation is different from the GT and/or SSN previously included in the called address or called party address, the newly produced GT and/or SSN replaces the existing one. The translation function of the SCRC will also set the RI, select the + +appropriate GSTMTP-SAP instance and provide information needed for the GSTMTP transfer (e.g., ~~Sequence Control~~ ~~OPC~~, ~~SLS~~ and ~~SIO~~). The routing procedures then continue as per 2.2.2.1. + +## 2.3 *SCCP routing procedures* + +The SCCP routing functions are based on information contained in the "called party address" or "called address". + +### 2.3.1 *Receipt of SCCP messages transferred by the GSTMTP* + +When a message is received in SCRC from the GSTMTP, and if the local SCCP or node is in an overload condition, SCRC shall inform SCMG. + +One of the following actions shall be taken by SCRC upon receipt of a message from the GSTMTP. The message is received by the SCCP when the GSTMTP invokes an GSTMTP-TRANSFER.indication primitive. + +- 1) If the message is a connection-oriented message other than a CR message, then SCRC passes the message to SCOC. +- 2) If it is a CR message or a connectionless message and the routing indicator in the "called party address" indicates "Route on SSN", then SCRC checks the status of the local subsystem: + - a) if the subsystem is available, the message is passed, based on the message type, to either SCOC or SCLC; + - b) if the subsystem is unavailable, and: + - the message is a connectionless message, then the message return procedure is initiated; + - the message is a CR message, then the connection refusal procedure is initiated. + +In addition, SCCP management is notified that a message was received for an unavailable subsystem. + +- 3) If it is a CR message or a connectionless message and the routing indicator in the "called party address" indicates "Route on GT", then a translation of the global title must be performed. + +The SCCP Hop Counter (if present) is decremented and if a Hop Counter violation is encountered (i.e., the value zero is reached), then: + +- if the message is a connectionless message, then the message return procedure is initiated; +- if the message is a CR message, then the connection refusal procedure is initiated. + +In addition, maintenance functions are alerted. + +- a) If the translation of the global title is successful (see 2.4.4), then: + - i) if the DPC is the node itself, then the message is passed, based on the message type, to either SCOC or SCLC; + - ii) if the DPC is not the node itself and the message is a connectionless message, then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked unless the compatibility test sends the message to SCLC or unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism; + - iii) if the DPC is not the node itself and the message is a CR message, then: + - if a coupling of connection sections is required, the message is passed to SCOC; + - if no coupling of connection sections is required, the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism. + +- b) In all other cases: +- if the message is a connectionless message, then the message return procedure is initiated; + - if the message is a CR message, then the connection refusal procedure is initiated. + +### 2.3.2 Messages from connectionless or connection-oriented control to SCCP routing control + +One of the following actions is taken by SCCP routing upon receipt of a message from connectionless control or connection-oriented control. + +- 1) If the message is a CR message at a relay node with coupling (where connection sections are being associated), then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked taking into account the result of the global title translation already done. +- 2) If the message is a connection-oriented message other than a CR message, and: + - the DPC and remote SCCP are available, then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism; + - the DPC and/or remote SCCP are not available, then the connection release procedure is initiated. +- 3) If the "called address" in the primitive associated with a CR message or connectionless message includes one of the following combinations from Table 1, then one of the four actions described below is taken. + +**Table 1/Q.714 – Actions upon receipt of a message from connectionless control or a CR from connection-oriented control** + +| | No GT
No SSN
or SSN = 0 | GT
No SSN
or SSN = 0 | No GT
SSN | GT
SSN | +|-------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------|-----------------| +| No DPC | (4) | (2) | (4) | (2) | +| DPC = own node | (4) | (2) | (1) | (1), (2) (Note) | +| DPC = remote node | (4) | (3) | (1) | (1), (3) (Note) | + +NOTE – The choice of the appropriate action is outside the scope of this Recommendation. + +#### Action (1) + +- a) If the DPC is not the node itself and the remote DPC, SCCP and SSN are available, then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked unless the compatibility test returns the message to SCLC or unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism; +- b) If the DPC is not the node itself and the remote DPC, SCCP and/or SSN are not available, then: + - for connectionless messages, the message return procedure is initiated; + - for CR messages, the connection refusal procedure is initiated. +- c) If the DPC is the node itself, then the procedures in 2.3.1, item 2) above are followed. +NOTE – The function of routing between local subsystems is implementation dependent. + +#### Action (2) + +- a) If the translation of the global title is successful (see 2.4.4), then: + - if the DPC is the node itself, then the message is passed, based on the message type, to either SCOC or SCLC; + - if the DPC is not the node itself, the compatibility may return the message to SCLC or the message may be discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism. The DPC shall be placed in the "called party address" before ~~then~~ the GSTMTF-TRANSFER.request primitive is invoked ~~unless the compatibility test returns the message to SCLC or unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism.~~ +- b) If the translation of the global title is unsuccessful (see 2.4.4), and: + - the message is a connectionless message, then the message return procedure is initiated; + - the message is a CR message, then the connection refusal procedure is initiated. + +#### Action (3) + +The same actions as Action (1) apply, without checking the SSN. + +#### Action (4) + +The "called address" contains insufficient information. If: + +- the message is a connectionless message, then the message return procedure is initiated; +- the message is a CR message, then the connection refusal procedure is initiated. + +## 2.4 *Global title translation* + +### 2.4.1 *General characteristics of the GTT* + +The Global Title Translation (GTT) function shall be invoked within the SCCP routing control (SCRC) under the routing procedures described in 2.3. + +If the GTT function results in a "routing indicator" (see 3.4.1/Q.713) equal to "Route on GT", then the GTT function must provide a global title and the DPC of the SCCP node where that global title will be translated. This process shall be repeated until the GTT function results in a "routing indicator" equal to "Route on SSN", which means that the final destination has been determined. + +The global title addressing capability and the GTT function allow diverse groups of the SCCP addressable entities associated with different applications to establish their own addressing schemes. All the application-specific addressing schemes requiring the GTT shall be specified within the GTT procedural framework stated in this subclause. + +### 2.4.2 *Terminology definitions* + +#### 2.4.2.1 *GT information* + +The GT information is made up of the Global Title Indicator (GTI) and the Global Title (GT). + +##### 1) **Global Title Indicator (GTI)** + +Refer to 3.4.1/Q.713 and 3.4.2.3/Q.713 for the list of global title indicators recognized by the SCCP. The global title indicator is used to determine the content and format of the global title. + +##### 2) **Global Title (GT)** + +The global title consists of the mandatory Global Title Address Information (GTAI) and one or more of the following information elements depending on the GTI: + +###### a) **Encoding Scheme (ES)** + +Refer to 3.4.2.3/Q.713 for the list of encoding schemes recognized by the SCCP. The encoding scheme indicates how the global title address information is encoded. If the encoding scheme is included, then the global title address information shall be decoded accordingly. If the encoding scheme is not included but translation type is included, then the translation rules associated with the translation type should specify the encoding scheme. Refer to d) and 3) for the description of the translation type and translation rules. The meaning of each encoding scheme value is identical for all the GTI values indicating that the encoding scheme is included. + +###### b) **Numbering Plan (NP)** + +Refer to 3.4.2.3.3/Q.713 for the list of numbering plans recognized by the SCCP. The numbering plan indicates how the global title address information is constructed from different parts (e.g. country codes, subscriber number or national significant number) according to the syntax and semantic defined for that particular numbering plan. The semantic of each numbering plan value is identical for all the GTI values indicating that the numbering plan is included. + +###### c) **Nature of Address Indicator (NAI)** + +Refer to 3.4.2.3.1/Q.713 for the list of nature of address indicator values recognized by the SCCP. The nature of address indicator defines the "scope" of the global title address information for a specific numbering plan. The semantic of the nature of address indicator value depends only on the numbering plan. In particular, it does not depend on GTI values. + +###### d) **Translation Type (TT)** + +Refer to 3.4.2.3.2/Q.713 for the list of translation types recognized by the SCCP, and refer to Annex B/Q.713 for the TT values recognized by SCCP when GTI is set to 4. The translation type together with the numbering plan and the nature of address indicator determines a specific translator which defines a specific set of translation rules. + +A particular TT value shall implicitly specify the encoding scheme of the GTAI value if the encoding scheme is not included for a particular GTI. + +A TT value is unique only within the context of a GTI. + +##### 3) **Translation rules** + +A set of rules specifies which type of SCCP addressable entities, associated with some service/application must be unambiguously addressed with the global title address information, and how the global title address information should be interpreted by the GTT function. + +The translation rules should specify which portion of the GTAI is required to unambiguously identify or distinguish one SCCP addressable entity from another pertaining to the applications. However, the rules should not specify which GTAI portion is to be translated to which DPC or DPC + SSN. The determination of the DPC and SSN is implementation-specific and requires local information (see 2.4.3.1) specific to the destination network. The translation rules may specify if the SSN is to be determined from the translation. + +##### 4) Identification of translation rules + +The translation rules shall be uniquely identified by the GTI and its associated TT, NP and NAI values. + +#### 2.4.2.2 Other definitions used in the GTT function + +##### 1) SCCP Entity + +An SCCP Entity is a local GSTMTP-SAP + a ~~DPC~~ + possibly an SSN. + +NOTE – An SCCP Entity with an SSN equal to zero (SSN not known or not used) is different from an SCCP Entity without an SSN value. + +##### 2) SCCP Entity Set + +An SCCP Entity Set is made of one SCCP Entity or is made of two SCCP Entities of the same type (if an SSN is present in one SCCP Entity, then an SSN shall also be present in the other). In the latter case the two SCCP Entities may be considered either as a "primary" SCCP Entity and a "backup" SCCP Entity or may be interpreted as two equal SCCP Entities that can be used for a loadsharing purpose. + +##### 3) DPC + +A DPC is significant only in a given signalling transport MTP-network. Because an SCCP gateway manages several GSTMTP networks, a DPC, as a result of the global title translation, could be accompanied by an identification of the concerned signalling transport MTP-network, i.e., that is the GSTMTP-SAP instance. + +### 2.4.3 Input of the GTT function + +The following types of information can be an input for the GTT function. + +#### 2.4.3.1 Local information (mandatory input) + +The local information contains firstly the routing information and secondly the management information. + +- The routing information is specific to the implementation network and is administratively input to the GTT function. They are static data implementing the "translation rules" required to translate the global title address information for the applications. +- The management information is specific to the state of the network in terms of availability. They are dynamic data reflecting the accessibility of the SCCP nodes (~~accessibility at the MTP and SCCP level~~) and the accessibility of the subsystems handled by the different SCCP nodes. + +#### 2.4.3.2 GT information (mandatory input) + +The GT information is a required input for the GTT function. It contains: + +- the GTI value; +- the TT, NP, NAI and ES values depending on the GTI; +- the GTAI value. + +#### 2.4.3.3 SSN (mandatory input if present) + +Even if SSN equals zero, the SSN is a mandatory input of the GTT function. + +#### 2.4.3.4 Loadsharing information + +If the GTT function is able to handle a loadsharing mechanism, then the value of the Sequence Control parameter SLS may be an input for the GTT function. + +### 2.4.4 Output of the GTT function + +Three types of output are possible for the GTT function: + +- A "successful" output which contains the required parameters to route the message forward in the network or to distribute the message. +- An "unsuccessful" output where no translation exists for the given input (see steps 1, 2 and 4 described in 2.4.5). The failure causes are "no translation for an address of such nature" or "no translation for this specific address". +- An "unsuccessful" output where the translation exists but no available destination can be found (see step 4 described in 2.4.5). The failure causes may be "~~GSTMTP~~ failure", "SCCP failure" or "subsystem failure". + +Refer to 2.6 for the causes used in RLSD, CREF, XUDTS, LUDTS or UDTS messages. + +The two key outputs for the "normal" output of the GTT function are the DPC and the routing indicator. + +If the routing indicator is set to "Route on SSN", then the SSN is a required output of GTT function. The subsystem defined by DPC + SSN is expected to be accessible from SCRC. The DPC may be a local DPC in the case of a GT translation in the destination node. The GT information as an output is optional. + +If the routing indicator is set to "Route on GT", then the GT information is a required output of the GTT function and the DPC provided is expected to be accessible. The GT information is made up of the GTAI and TT, NP, NAI, ES with the corresponding GTI. The SSN is an optional output. + +### 2.4.5 Global title translation function + +When the GTT function is invoked by the SCRC, the GTT function shall perform the following steps: + +- 1) Step 1: the GTI and the three optional parameters TT, NP and NAI should be unambiguously associated to a translator which defines a set of translation rules. If this translator cannot be determined, the GTT function shall be aborted with the cause "no translation for an address of such nature". +- 2) Step 2: the set of translation rules determined by step 1 is used to analyse the GTAI possibly accompanied by the encoding scheme. If no output exists for this GTAI, then the GTT function shall be aborted with the cause "no translation for this specific address". Otherwise the output of this step 2 is at least the Routing Indicator (RI) and an SCCP Entity Set. In addition, if the routing indicator is set to "Route on GT", then a GT information is a mandatory output otherwise the GT information as an output is optional. +- 3) Step 3: if an SSN is available as a GTT function input, then the step 3 consists of using this input SSN as a default value if some SSN are missing in the SCCP Entity Set. It may happen that the value zero appears as an SSN value in the SCCP Entity Set: this is a correct value which overwrites the SSN given as input of the GTT function. +- 4) Step 4: this is where the management information is taken into account and where a loadsharing mechanism can be implemented. + +By definition an SCCP entity is declared accessible when the two following conditions are fulfilled: + +- The DPC concerned is accessible (~~at MTP and SCCP level~~) or the DPC corresponds to the local node. +- If the routing indicator is set on "Route on SSN", then an SSN is present and different from zero and this subsystem is accessible in the node defined by the DPC: + - a) If the SCCP Entity Set contains only one SCCP Entity and this SCCP Entity is inaccessible, then the result of the GTT function is "~~GSTMTP~~ failure", "SCCP failure" + +or "subsystem failure". When the routing indicator is set to "Route on SSN" and if the inaccessibility is due to the absence of SSN in the SCCP Entity or due to an SSN value equal to zero, then the result of the GTT function shall be "no translation for this specific address". + +- b) If the SCCP Entity Set contains only one SCCP Entity and this SCCP Entity is accessible, then: + - If the routing indicator is set to "Route on GT", then the outputs of the GTT function are the RI and the GT information as an output of step 2, the DPC found in the SCCP Entity and possibly the associated SSN as an output of step 3; + - If the routing indicator is set to "Route on SSN", then the outputs of the GTT function are the RI and possibly the GT information as an output of step 2, and the DPC and SSN found in the SCCP Entity as an output of step 3. +- c) If the SCCP Entity Set contains two SCCP Entities and if there is no loadsharing mechanism, then the accessibility of the "primary" SCCP Entity is checked. If this "primary" SCCP Entity is accessible, then this "primary" SCCP Entity is selected as part of the GTT function result. If the "primary" SCCP Entity is inaccessible, then the accessibility of the "backup" SCCP Entity is checked. If this "backup" SCCP Entity is accessible, then this "backup" SCCP Entity is selected as part of the GTT function result. If the "backup" SCCP Entity is inaccessible, then the result of the GTT function is "~~GSTMTP~~ failure", "SCCP failure" or "Subsystem failure" (if the refusal or return causes are different for both SCCP Entities it is an implementation-dependent matter which one is selected). If the inaccessibility is due to the absence of SSN in the two SCCP Entities or due to SSN values equal to zero when the routing indicator is set to "Route on SSN", then the result of the GTT function shall be "no translation for this specific address". +- d) If the SCCP Entity Set contains two SCCP Entities and if there is a loadsharing mechanism implemented, then one of the two SCCP Entities is chosen depending on the loadsharing information and on the accessibility of the SCCP Entities. If one SCCP Entity can be chosen, then this SCCP Entity is selected as part of the GTT function result. If the SCCP Entities are both inaccessible, then the result of the GTT function is "~~GSTMTP~~ failure", "SCCP failure" or "Subsystem failure" (if the refusal or return causes are different for both SCCP Entities it is an implementation-dependent matter which one is selected). If the inaccessibility is due to the absence of SSN in the two SCCP Entities or due to SSN values equal to zero when the routing indicator is set to "Route on SSN", then the result of the GTT function shall be "no translation for this specific address". + +Figure 2 shows the different steps of the global title translation function as well as the parameters used in this global title translation function. + +In Figure 2: + +- an in-bracket parameter means an optional parameter; +- the dashed line with the SLS parameter means that the loadsharing functionality itself is not required in a given implementation. If this functionality is present, then the SLS parameter may be an input parameter. + +![Figure 2/Q.714 – Steps and parameters of the global title translation function. The diagram illustrates a four-step process for translating a Global Title (GTI) into a Destination Point Code (DPC). Step 1: Input GTI (TT)(NP)(NAI) is processed by a 'Translator selector' to produce a 'Translator Identity'. Step 2: The 'Translator Identity' and 'Routing information' are input to 'Translation rules', which output (TT')(NP')(NAI')(ES')(GTAI') and 'RI'. Step 3: The 'Translation rules' also output an 'SSCP Entity Set' to 'SSN production', which outputs (SSN'). Step 4: The 'SSCP Entity Set' from Step 3 and 'Management information' are input to an 'Availability tester', which outputs (SSN') and 'DPC'. The diagram is divided into four vertical columns labeled Step 1, Step 2, Step 3, and Step 4. Horizontal lines represent data flow between components, and vertical lines separate the steps. A reference code Q.2220_F02 is in the bottom right corner.](77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg) + +Figure 2/Q.714 – Steps and parameters of the global title translation function. The diagram illustrates a four-step process for translating a Global Title (GTI) into a Destination Point Code (DPC). Step 1: Input GTI (TT)(NP)(NAI) is processed by a 'Translator selector' to produce a 'Translator Identity'. Step 2: The 'Translator Identity' and 'Routing information' are input to 'Translation rules', which output (TT')(NP')(NAI')(ES')(GTAI') and 'RI'. Step 3: The 'Translation rules' also output an 'SSCP Entity Set' to 'SSN production', which outputs (SSN'). Step 4: The 'SSCP Entity Set' from Step 3 and 'Management information' are input to an 'Availability tester', which outputs (SSN') and 'DPC'. The diagram is divided into four vertical columns labeled Step 1, Step 2, Step 3, and Step 4. Horizontal lines represent data flow between components, and vertical lines separate the steps. A reference code Q.2220\_F02 is in the bottom right corner. + +**Figure 2/Q.714 – Steps and parameters of the global title translation function** + +## 2.5 Compatibility test + +The compatibility test defined in this subclause applies to connectionless procedures only. + +If the network structure is such that incompatibilities requiring segmentation, truncation or message type change are never present, then the compatibility test is not required. + +Based on the available knowledge at the local node, the compatibility test ensures that: + +- 1) the SCRC never attempts to send a message that cannot be understood by the recipient SCCP node; +- 2) the outgoing messages are of the appropriate length to be carried by the underlying GSTMTP. + +The compatibility test in SCRC determines whether: + +- 1) An LUDT message needs to be segmented. +- 2) An LUDTS message needs to be truncated. +- 3) The message type needs to be changed. In some cases, a message may be changed to a type preferred by the recipient node (see 4.1.2). + +If no segmentation, truncation or message type change is required, then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER primitive is invoked unless the message is discarded by the traffic limitation mechanism (see 2.6). Otherwise, the message is passed to SCLC for the necessary changes. + +## 2.6 Traffic limitation mechanism + +The SCCP congestion control procedures may be subject to improvement pending further analysis of the impact of these procedures in different network scenarios and based on the results of operational experience. + +### 2.6.1 General + +The GSTMTP notifies the SCCP of unavailable or congested remote signalling points or remote SCCP unavailability using the appropriate OUT-OF-SERVICEMTP PAUSE indication or CONGESTIONMTP STATUS indication primitive. The SCCP then informs its users. + +Each destination (GSTDPC + MTP-SAP instance) is associated with a Restriction Levels for connectionless (RLCL) and for connection-oriented (RLCO) services, and a RestrictionSubLevels for connectionless (RSLCL) and connection-oriented (RSLCO) which are reported by SCMG (see 5.2.4). + +These levels, together with the importance of the message to be sent, allow the reduction of the traffic towards a congested node by discarding a portion of the concerned traffic. + +### 2.6.2 Importance of a message + +Whenever a message is to be sent, its importance is the minimum of the permitted maximum importance value for the message type (See Table 2), and: + +- at the originating node the importance value (if provided) in the request or response primitive (otherwise the default value from Table 2 applies); +- at a relay node: + - the importance value received in the incoming message contained in the optional parameter "importance" (CR, CC, CREF, RLSD, XUDT, XUDTS, LUDT or LUDTS); or + - a value derived from the national option of the priority parameter in the TRANSFER indication primitive field in the SIO in the MTP field; otherwise + - a default value assigned from Table 2. + +If there is a conflict between the importance parameter and a value derived from the SIO in a received message, then the importance value used is a network choice. + +**Table 2/Q.714 – Default and maximum importance value** + +| Message type | Default importance | Max importance | Message type | Default importance | Max importance | +|--------------|--------------------|----------------|--------------|--------------------|----------------| +| CR | 2 | 4 | RSC | 6 | – | +| CC | 3 | 4 | ERR | 7 | – | +| CREF | 2 | 4 | RLC | 4 | – | +| DT1 | 4 | 6 | RLSD | 6 | 6 | +| DT2 | 4 | 6 | UDT | 4 | 6 | +| AK | 6 | – | UDTS | 3 | – | +| IT | 6 | – | XUDT | 4 | 6 | +| ED | 7 | – | XUDTS | 3 | – | +| EA | 7 | – | LUDT | 4 | 6 | +| RSR | 6 | – | LUDTS | 3 | – | + +The "–" means that the message type is not generated as a result of a primitive from the SCCP user therefore the default importance value always applies. + +NOTE – The values in Table 2 might be revised as operational experiences are gained. How these default and maximum values should be administered is implementation dependent. + +When in a national network the importance information is carried in the priority ~~parameter level in the SIO~~, then it is the task of the gateway between a national network and the international network to provide the mapping between the importance parameter in the SCCP message and the priority ~~parameter in the SIO~~. + +### 2.6.3 *Handling of messages to a congested node* + +When a message has to be sent towards a remote SCCP node, the importance of the message is compared to the restriction level of that remote SCCP node for the service corresponding to the message to be sent (connectionless or connection-oriented): + +- If the importance of the message is greater than RL, then the GSTMTP-TRANSFER primitive is invoked. +- If the importance of the message is lower than RL, then the message is discarded. +- If the importance of a message is equal to RL, then the message shall be discarded proportionately as determined by the RSL value. The portion of traffic reduction is considered to be network-specific. For the international network, the following values are provisionally assigned: + - RSL = 0 $\Rightarrow$ 0% of traffic discarded. + - RSL = 1 $\Rightarrow$ 25% of traffic discarded. + - RSL = 2 $\Rightarrow$ 50% of traffic discarded. + - RSL = 3 $\Rightarrow$ 75% of traffic discarded. + +When a message has to be discarded, then: + +- for connectionless messages, the message return procedure is initiated; +- for CR messages, the connection refusal procedure is initiated; +- for CO messages other than the CR message, no additional actions are taken. If the message was locally originated, the SCCP may inform the user of the discard by issuing an N-INFORM primitive. + +## 2.7 *Calling party address treatment* + +### 2.7.1 *Address indicator* + +The segmenting/reassembly process of connectionless messages requires that an unambiguous calling party address is passed in each segment. The practice of "deleting" the calling party address from an XUDT or LUDT or UDT message by coding its "Address Indicator" bit 1...7 to zero shall not be used for evolving applications, because at some time their messages may grow beyond the limit supported by one (X)UDT message. + +### 2.7.2 *Calling party address in the international network* + +It is the task of the outgoing international gateway2 (or originating international node) to make sure that the calling party address or responding address (i.e. called party address parameter in a CC or CREF message) satisfies the ~~following rules below~~: + +NOTE – An international gateway is an SCCP node having an GST-SAP instance for the international network and at least one GST-SAP instance for a national network. + +- If routing is based on SSN, the DPC, if present, is one as defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.708, the SSN must be present and should be internationally standardized. +- If routing is based on GT, the GTI must be equal to 4, the SSN is either: + - one of the internationally standardized numbers; or + - national SSN value, if no internationally standardized SSN is specified and it is appropriate to use the national value (see Annex B.2/Q.713); or + +- coded as "0" (i.e., "unknown"). +- The Global Title must have international significance. Within a national network, it is a national option to decide on the scope ("significance") of the calling/responding party addresses. However, when the address is only locally or nationally significant, it may be necessary to change the address in relay or gateway nodes by adding a trunk code or country code to the Global Title address information. This is the case whenever the message is routed outside the domain where the address is valid. + +The incoming international gateway (or possibly any other node) may, as part of its optional screening procedures, provide tests to verify the principles specified above. The screening procedures are further specified in 2.7.4. + +### 2.7.3 *Routing indicator* + +When the called party address in an XUDT or LUDT or UDT message has the routing indicator set on "Route on GT", the routing indicator in the calling party address shall also be set to "Route on GT", unless the destination is in the same GSTMTP network and that its GSTMTP routing tables allows the message to be routed back. + +For a CR message, the calling party address may be of the form "Route on SSN" because the subsequent messages will be routed section by section. + +### 2.7.4 *Screening* + +Screening is an optional network-specific function. + +Further screening of the received calling party address may be performed in a node to check, for example, whether a valid translator for NP/TT/NAI is available and/or whether the calling party digits are allowable. + +### 2.7.5 *Inclusion of OPC in the calling party address* + +The rules described in the following subclauses apply. + +#### 2.7.5.1 *LUDT or XUDT or UDT message* + +##### a) *Originating node* + +When the routing indicator of the called party address is set on "Route on GT" and the routing indicator of the calling party address is set on "Route on SSN", the SCCP routing function should include the OPC in the calling party address. In all other cases the inclusion of the OPC in the calling party address is irrelevant. + +##### b) *Relay node* + +When the routing indicator of the calling party address is set on "Route on SSN", and no SPC is present in it, then the OPC shall be derived from the GST-SAP via which the message has been received ~~MTP routing label shall be taken and~~ inserted into the calling party address before sending the message to the next node. When crossing signalling transport network ~~MTP~~-boundaries the value "Route on SSN" is however not allowed (refer to 2.7.2). + +##### c) *Terminating node* + +When the routing indicator of the calling party address is set on "Route on SSN" and an SPC is present in the calling party address, then this SPC identifies the originating SCCP node. + +When the routing indicator of the calling party address is set on "Route on SSN" and no SPC is present in the calling party address, then the OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the message has been received ~~in the MTP routing label~~ identifies the originating SCCP node. + +#### 2.7.5.2 CR message + +##### a) Originating node + +If the routing indicator of the called party address is set on "Route on GT" and it is known that no coupling will take place in the next relay node, then the SCCP routing function should include a calling party address (also when not given by the local SCCP subsystem), and in the calling party address the OPC is included. + +In this case               Routing indicator = Route on SSN +                              SPC = OPC of the originating node +                              SSN = SSN of local subsystem + +##### b) Relay node without coupling + +The SCCP routing function shall check the calling party address parameters in the received CR message: + +- When a calling party address parameter is included and an SPC is present, then the calling party address parameter to be sent to the next SCCP node shall be identical to the calling party address parameter of the received CR message. +- When a calling party address parameter is included and the SPC is absent, then the OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the CR message has been received of the MTP routing label of the received CR message shall be inserted in the calling party address parameter of the CR message to be sent to the next SCCP node. If no SSN is present it may be added with value "unknown". + +In this case               Routing indicator is unchanged +                              SPC = OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the message has been received of the received MTP routing label +                              SSN and GT are unchanged + +- When the calling party address parameter is absent, then a calling party address parameter containing the OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the CR message has been received of the MTP routing label of the received CR message shall be inserted in the CR message to be sent to the next SCCP node. An SSN may be added with value "unknown". + +In this case               Routing indicator = "Route on SSN" +                              SPC = OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the message has been received of the received MTP routing label +                              SSN = unknown +                              no GT + +##### c) Relay node with coupling + +The OPC of the calling party address of the received CR message identifies the originating SCCP node of the incoming connection section. If the calling party address is absent or if no OPC is available in the calling party address, then the OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the CR message has been received of the MTP routing label of the received CR message is taken for identifying the originating SCCP node of the incoming connection section. + +The SCCP routing function shall check the calling party address parameter in the received CR message: + +- When a calling party address parameter is included and an SPC is present, then the SCCP routing function shall replace the SPC of the received CR message by the OPC of its own node and corresponding to the outgoing signalling transport MTP-network, or shall delete the SPC field from the received calling party address parameter. Deleting the SPC is not advisable, because it means reformatting the message, and it + +may have to be re-included in the next relay node if no coupling is done there. If no SSN is present it may be added with value "unknown". + +In this case            Routing indicator is unchanged +                             SPC = OPC of relay node with coupling +                             SSN and GT are not changed + +- When a calling party address parameter is included and the SPC is absent, then the calling party address parameter of the CR message to be sent to the next SCCP node may be identical to the calling party address parameter of the CR message received. + +However, if it is known that no coupling will take place in the next relay node, then the SCCP routing function should include an SPC in the calling party address parameter. The SPC is the OPC of its own node and corresponding to the outgoing signalling transport MTP-network. + +- When the calling party address parameter is absent no special actions are necessary. + +However, if it is known that no coupling will take place in the next relay node, the SCCP routing function should include a calling party address parameter containing an SPC. The SPC is the OPC of its own node and corresponding to the outgoing signalling transport MTP-network. + +##### d)        *Terminating node* + +The SPC of the calling party address of the received CR message identifies the originating SCCP node of the incoming connection section. If the calling party address is absent or if no SPC is available in the calling party address, then the OPC derived from the GST-SAP via which the CR message has been received ~~of the MTP routing label of the received CR message~~ is taken for identifying the originating SCCP node of the incoming connection section. + +## 2.8        *Routing failures* + +When SCCP routing is unable to transfer a message, one of the causes described in 2.8.1 to 2.8.6 is indicated in the RLSD message (refer to 3.11/Q.713, Release cause), the CREF message (refer to 3.15/Q.713, Refusal cause), the XUDTS, the LUDTS or the UDTS message (refer to 3.12/Q.713, Return cause). + +When an end node is informed of a routing failure, this information is forwarded towards the SCCP user by using the N-DISCONNECT primitive (refer to reason for release in 2.1.1.2.4/Q.711) or the N-NOTICE primitive (refer to reason for return in 2.2.2.2.4/Q.711). Annex A/Q.713 describes the mapping between the causes found in the messages (RLSD, CREF, XUDTS, LUDTS or UDTS) and the reasons found in primitives (N-DISCONNECT, N-NOTICE). + +### 2.8.1    *No translation for an address of such nature* + +The translation was invoked for a combination of translation type, numbering plan and nature of address for which no translation exists in this exchange (refer to 2.4.5, Step 1). + +The following causes apply: + +- Release cause: not applicable. +- Refusal cause: no translation for an address of such nature. +- Return cause: no translation for an address of such nature. + +### 2.8.2    *No translation for this specific address* + +The translation was invoked for a sequence of digits for which no matching (sub)sequence can be found in the translation table, hence translation is inconclusive (refer to 2.4.5, Step 2). The same + +reason applies also when the RI determined by the GTT is set to "Route on SSN" and an SSN is present neither in the SCCP Entity Set, nor as input of the GTT (refer to 2.4.5, Step 4). + +The following causes apply: + +- Release cause: not applicable. +- Refusal cause: destination address unknown. +- Return cause: no translation for this specific address. + +### 2.8.3 **GSTMTP/SCCP/subsystem failure** + +The translation fails because no available route could be found for the concerned destination address (refer to 2.4.5, Step 4). This may be due to failures in: + +- 1) GSTMTP (destination point inaccessible); +- 2) SCCP (SCCP user part unavailable in relay node or end node); +- 3) SCCP subsystem (subsystem prohibited or unavailable); +- 4) a combination of two of the three above reasons when an alternative route exists and both the normal and the backup routes are unavailable. + +The following causes apply: + +- for 1): + - Release cause: GSTMTP failure. + - Refusal cause: destination inaccessible. + - Return cause: GSTMTP failure. +- for 2): + - Release cause: SCCP failure. + - Refusal cause: SCCP failure. + - Return cause: SCCP failure. +- for 3): + - Release cause: subsystem failure. + - Refusal cause: subsystem failure. + - Return cause: subsystem failure. +- for 4): + - Release cause: GSTMTP failure, SCCP failure or subsystem failure. + - Refusal cause: GSTMTP failure, SCCP failure or subsystem failure. + - Return cause: GSTMTP failure, SCCP failure or subsystem failure. + +### 2.8.4 **GSTMTP/SCCP/subsystem congestion** + +Routing failures due to subsystem congestion are for further study. + +When a routing failure due to GSTMTP/SCCP/nodal congestion is detected the following causes apply: + +- In the N-DISCONNECT primitive: QoS not available, transient condition. +- In the N-NOTICE primitive: network congestion. +- In the N-INFORM primitive: network service congestion. +- In the CREF message: QoS unavailable/transient. +- In the XUDTS or LUDTS or UDTS message: network congestion. + +### 2.8.5 Unequipped user + +A local unequipped user is determined by SCRC. + +The following causes apply: + +- Release cause: not relevant. +- Refusal cause: unequipped user. +- Return cause: unequipped user. + +### 2.8.6 Hop counter violation + +The hop counter reaches zero. It is an indication that an excessive routing could be present. + +The following causes apply: + +- Release cause: irrelevant. +- Refusal cause: hop counter violation. +- Return cause: hop counter violation. + +## --- 9.4 Connection-oriented procedures + +*In 3.1.1/Q.714, remove the 3rd paragraph.* + +*In 3.1.4.1/Q.714, remove all material after the first bullet item 4).* + +*In 3.1.4.2/Q.714, replace list item 3) with the following:* + +- +- < > +- 3) The node sending the CC message (identified by ~~the parameter OPC contained in the MTP TRANSFER indication primitive which conveyed the CC message plus the~~ GSTMTP-SAP instance) is associated with the connection section. +- + +*In 3.1.5.1/Q.714, remove all material after the first bullet item 4).* + +*In 3.1.5.1/Q.714, replace list item 2) with the following:* + +- +- < > +- 2) The node sending the CR message (identified by the OPC in the calling party address or by default by ~~the OPC in the MTP label, and~~ the GSTMTP-SAP instance) is associated with the incoming connection section. +- + +*In 3.1.5.2/Q.714, replace list item 3) with the following:* + +- +- < > +- 3) The originating node of the CC message (identified by ~~the OPC in the MTP label plus~~ the GSTMTP-SAP instance) is associated with the outgoing connection section. +- + +*In 3.1.5.2/Q.714, remove all material after the first bullet item 4).* + +*In 3.1.6.1/Q.714, replace list item 2) with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +- 2) The originating node of the CR message (identified by the OPC in the calling party address or by default by the ~~OPC in the MTP label, and the GST~~MTP-SAP instance) is associated with the incoming connection section. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 3.1.6.1/Q.714, remove all material after the first bullet item 4).* + +*In 3.2.1/Q.714, remove under item 1) the bullet item b).* + +*In 3.2.1.1/Q.714, remove the following text at the end of the paragraph "if the refusal procedure has been initiated by using the refusal indicator in the REQUEST Type 2 interface element, then the refusal cause contains "SCCP user originated" ".* + +*In 3.2.1.2/Q.714, remove the 3rd paragraph.* + +*In 3.2.2/Q.714, remove the bullet item 2).* + +## 9.5 Connectionless procedures + +*In the introduction to clause 4/Q.714, replace list items a) to c) with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +- a) an environment with only signalling MTP-network(s) supporting a maximum length of 272 octets according to Recommendation Q.704 (pure Q.704); +- b) an environment with only signalling MTP-network(s) supporting a maximum length of 4096 octets (or more) according to Recommendation Q.2210 (pure Q.2210); +- c) an environment where interworking occurs between signalling MTP-networks that support in parts only maximum length of 272 octets and in other parts a maximum length of 4096 octets (or more) according to Recommendations Q.704 and Q.2210. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*Replace the 2nd paragraph after the list items a) to c) with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +An implementation shall support the XUDT, XUDTS, LUDT, and LUDTS all-message types, parameters, and parameter values (see ITU-T Rec. Q.713) applicable to the connectionless protocol classes and capabilities of this Recommendation. But the network may allow lesser functionality according to the place of the network(s) in which the implementation is required to operate. + +UDT and UDTS messages are deprecated. In particular, a UDT message shall not be used to transmit user data in protocol class 0 when the destination lies within another signalling network. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*Remove footnote 5 in the 3rd paragraph after the list items a) to c) and insert the note in the mainline text as follows:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +The onnectionless procedures allow a user of the SCCP to request transfer of up to 2560-3952 octets5 of user data without first requesting establishment of a signalling connection. + +NOTE – The maximum number of octets depends on the length of the called and calling party addresses, and on whether or not segmentation may occur. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*Replace the 5th paragraph after the list items a) to c) with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +Transfer of the user data is accomplished by including the user data in XUDT or LUDT or ~~UDT~~ messages. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*Replace the last paragraph before 4.1/Q.714 with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +The SCCP relies on the services of the GST MTP for transfer of SCCP messages. Based on the characteristics of the GST MTP, the protocol class 1 service may be used in such a way that it provides a quality of service that has a lower probability of out-of-sequence messages than that provided by protocol class 0. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*Replace the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of 4.1/Q.714 with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +The user data is then transferred in XUDT or LUDT or ~~UDT~~ message(s), using SCCP and MTP routing functions and the appropriate GST-SAP instance, to the "Called address" indicated in the N-UNITDATA request primitive. If protocol class 1 is used, the sequence control parameter shall be included and contain the SLS value. + +The connectionless data transfer service is also used to transport SCCP management messages, which are transferred in the "data" field of XUDT or LUDT or ~~UDT~~ messages. If protocol class 1 is used, the sequence control parameter shall be included and contain the SLS value. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 4.1/Q.714, replace the note and the two paragraphs after it with the following:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +NOTE – The SCCP uses the services of the GST MTP and the GST MTP may, under severe network conditions, discard messages (see for example 2.3.5.1/Q.704). Therefore, the user of the SCCP may not always be informed of non-delivery of user data. + +The GST MTP notifies the SCCP of available, unavailable or congested remote signalling points or ~~remote SCCP unavailability~~ using the IN-SERVICE indication, the OUT-OF-SERVICE indication, and the CONGESTION indication. ~~MTP PAUSE indication or MTP STATUS indication~~ primitives. Layer management notifies the SCCP of remote SCCP User Part availability or unavailability. The SCCP then informs its users. + +When an ~~UDT~~ or XUDT or LUDT message is received at the destination node, an N-UNITDATA indication primitive is invoked, after possible reassembly of all segments, except for the SCCP management messages. The SCCP management (SCMG) messages are passed to the SCMG entity instead. + +>>>>>>>>----- + +*In 4.1.1.1.2/Q.714, replace the first two bullet items with the following 3 items:* + +<<<<<<<<----- + +- The SCCP shall place each segment of user data into separate XUDT messages, each with the same Called Party Address ~~and identical MTP routing information (DPC, SLS)~~. +- The Calling Party Address ~~and the OPC~~ in each XUDT message shall be coded identically, in the manner described in 2.1, SCCP Addressing. + +Every XUDT message shall be submitted to the same appropriate GST-SAP instance with the same value in the "Sequence Control" of the TRANSFER.request primitive. + +*In 4.1.1.2.1/Q.714, replace the first paragraph (introduction to bullet items) with the following:* + +Upon receipt of an LUDT or XUDT message with the F-bit set to one and the "remaining segment" field different from zero in the segmentation parameter, the destination SCCP shall initiate a new reassembly process, using the Calling Party Address, the GST-SAP instance through which the LUDT or XUDT was received, ~~MTP routing information~~ and the Segmentation Local Reference to uniquely identify the reassembly process. Initiating a reassembly process involves the following steps: + +*In 4.1.1.2.2/Q.714, replace the first bullet item with the following:* + +- The SCCP shall associate the received XUDT or LUDT message with a particular reassembly process, using the unique combination of the Calling Party Address, the GST-SAP instance through which the LUDT or XUDT was received, ~~MTP routing information,~~ and the Segmentation Local Reference field of the segmentation parameter. If no association is possible, the SCCP shall discard the message. + +**9.6 SCCP management procedures** + +*Replace clause 5/Q.714 with the following:* + +**5 SCCP management procedures** + +**5.1 General** + +The purpose of SCCP management is to provide procedures to maintain network performance by rerouting or throttling traffic in the event of failure in the network. + +Although SCCP management has its own subsystem number, the procedures in this clause do not apply to the SCCP management as an SCCP user. For the cases where the SCCP management's SSN is used to indicate the availability/unavailability of the SCCP, the applicable procedures are explicitly stated as applying to SSN = 1. ~~SSN = "1"~~ is assigned to SCCP management, whereas the remaining SSNs are assigned to SCCP users, except SSN = 0. The status of SSN = 1 is assumed to reflect the status of the entire SCCP at a node. + +SCCP management is organized into two sub-functions: signalling point status management and subsystem status management. Signalling point status management and subsystem status management allow SCCP management to use information concerning the accessibility of remote signalling points and subsystems, respectively, to permit the network to adjust to failure, and recovery. + +SCCP management procedures rely on: + +- 1) out-of-service, in-service, failure, recovery, and congestion information provided in the OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication, IN-SERVICE.indication, and CONGESTION.indication ~~MTP-PAUSE indication, MTP-RESUME indication and MTP-STATUS indication~~ primitives; ~~and~~ + +**ITU-T Rec. Q.2220 (12/2002)** 43 + +- 2) subsystem failure and recovery information, and SCCP (SSN = 1) congestion received in SCCP management messages; and +- 3) indications from layer management about remote SCCP User Part availability or unavailability. + +SCCP management information is currently defined to be transferred using the SCCP connectionless service with no return on error requested. The formats of these messages appear in ~~clause 8ITU-T Recommendation Q.713.~~ + +SCCP management maintains the status of remote SCCP nodes; and the status of remote or local subsystems. It cooperates with the SCCP routing control (including translation function) to stop traffic to inaccessible destinations and to provide rerouting of traffic through alternate routing or through selection of alternate remote subsystems. + +From the perspective of SCCP routing control, the remote SCCP nodes addressed by certain ranges of Global Titles can be operated in several modes; and the SCCP routing control (translation function) are supported by the signalling point status management procedures (see 5.2): + +- 1) *Solitary mode:* The destination subsystem or next translation node is chosen from the one single SCCP node. When that node or its SCCP fails, the SCCP management will notify the SCCP routing control; and the traffic towards the solitary nodes will be discarded or returned if return-option is set. In the case of connection-oriented procedures, the connection section will be refused or released. +- 2) *Replicated service in dominant mode:* The next translation node or destination subsystem can be chosen from two SCCP nodes. Traffic towards a specific subdomain (characterized by ranges of Global Titles) is normally sent to the SCCP of a "primary" node. When the "primary" node is inaccessible, the SCCP management will notify the routing control and this traffic is routed to the SCCP of a "backup" node. As soon as the "primary" node becomes accessible again, the traffic is again routed to it. +- 3) *Replicated service in dynamically loadshared mode:* The next translation node or destination subsystem is chosen from two SCCP nodes. The traffic is dynamically distributed to the next two nodes by the traffic-sending node. The next pair of SCCP nodes receiving the traffic will back-up each other. If one of the nodes becomes inaccessible, the SCCP management will notify the routing control and the traffic will be routed to the other one. As soon as the previously inaccessible node becomes accessible again, the traffic is dynamically distributed to those two nodes again. + +Remote SCCP-subsystems capable of providing the same application service for, as an example, the same subset of service subscribers can be grouped in "subsystem services". Several modes of operation for such a "subsystem service" can be distinguished and are supported by the subsystem status management procedures (see 5.3); when final translation results in "route on SSN". + +- 1) *Solitary subsystems:* When the solitary subsystem fails, the SCCP management will notify the SCCP routing control; and the traffic towards the solitary subsystem will be discarded or returned if the return-option is set. In the case of connection-oriented procedure, the connection section will be refused or released. +- 2) *Replicated subsystems in dominant mode:* the destination subsystem is chosen from two replicated subsystems. The traffic is normally sent to the "primary" subsystem. When the "primary" subsystem is inaccessible, the SCCP management will notify the routing control and this traffic is sent to the "backup" subsystem. As soon as the "primary" subsystem becomes accessible again, the traffic is again routed to it. +- 3) *Replicated subsystem in dynamically loadshared mode:* The destination subsystem is chosen from two replicated subsystems. The traffic is dynamically distributed to the two replicated subsystems. The replicated subsystems receiving the traffic will back up each other. If one of the subsystems becomes inaccessible, the SCCP management will notify the + +routing control and the traffic will be distributed to the other subsystem. As soon as the previously inaccessible subsystem becomes accessible again, the traffic is dynamically sent to those two subsystems again. + +In cases 2) and 3) above, sequences of messages that must go to the same replicated subsystem (e.g., all messages of a TCAP transaction after initial transaction set-up) should use an unambiguous address, so only the initial set-up message (e.g., TCAP:BEGIN) can use the modes 2 and 3. + +SCCP management procedures utilize the concept of a "concerned" subsystem or signalling point. In this context, a "concerned" entity means an entity with an immediate need to be informed of a particular signalling point/subsystem status change, independently of whether SCCP communication is in progress between the "concerned" entity and the affected entity with the status change8. + +NOTE – The definition of "concerned" subsystems or signalling points is network/architecture/application dependent. + +In some situations, the number of concerned subsystem or signalling points for a given subsystem may be zero. In this case, when the subsystem fails, or becomes unavailable, no broadcast of the subsystem prohibited message is performed. Similarly, no broadcast of the subsystem allowed message is performed for that given subsystem when it recovers. + +For nodes/subsystems that are not explicitly notified of status changes, i.e., they are not marked as "concerned", the SSA (subsystem-allowed)/SSP (subsystem-prohibited) messages directed to them is lost or no broadcast will take place after recovering from a ~~GST MTP~~ or SCCP failure, the response method is used. The response method ensures that an SSP (subsystem-prohibited) message is returned for a message to an unavailable subsystem, or an SSA (subsystem-allowed) message is returned as a result of the SST (subsystem-status-test) when the subsystem is available again. + +The signalling point prohibited, signalling point allowed and signalling point congested procedures, specified in 5.2.2, 5.2.3 and 5.2.4 respectively, deal with the accessibility of a signalling point. + +~~The local MTP network availability and unavailability procedures are described in 5.2.5 and 5.2.6, respectively.~~ + +The SCCP reports of SCCP and nodal congestion procedure is specified in 5.2.7 + +The inter- and intra-SCCP Management congestions reporting procedure is specified in 5.2.8. + +The subsystem prohibited and subsystem allowed procedures, detailed in 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 respectively, deal with the accessibility of a subsystem or the SCCP. + +An audit procedure to ensure that necessary subsystem management information is always available is specified in the subsystem status test procedure in 5.3.4. + +A subsystem may request to go out of service, using the coordinated state change control procedure specified in 5.3.5. + +Local subsystems are informed of any related subsystem status by the local broadcast procedure specified in 5.3.6. + +Concerned signalling points are informed of any related subsystem status by the broadcast procedure specified in 5.3.7. + +## **5.2      *Signalling point status management*** + +NOTE – The SCCP congestion control procedures may be subject to improvement pending further analysis of the impact of these procedures in different network scenarios and based on the results of operational experience. + +### 5.2.1 General + +Signalling point status management updates translation and status based on the information of signalling network out-of-service, in-service, failure, recovery, or congestion provided by the OUT-OF-SERVICE indication, IN-SERVICE indication, and CONGESTION indication ~~MTP-PAUSE indication, MTP-RESUME indication, or MTP-STATUS indication~~ primitives. This allows alternative routing to backup signalling points and/or backup subsystems. + +### 5.2.2 Signalling point prohibited + +When SCCP management receives an OUT-OF-SERVICE indication ~~MTP-PAUSE indication~~ primitive relating to a destination that becomes inaccessible, ~~or an MTP-STATUS indication primitive relating to an SCCP that becomes unavailable,~~ SCCP management performs the following actions. + +- 1) Informs the translation function to update the translation tables. +- 2) In the case where the SCCP has received an OUT-OF-SERVICE indication ~~MTP-PAUSE indication~~ primitive, SCCP management marks as "prohibited" the status of the remote signalling point, the remote SCCP and each subsystem at the remote signalling point. + +In the case where the SCCP has received an MTP-STATUS indication from layer management primitive relating to an unavailable SCCP, the SCCP marks the status of the SCCP and each SSN for the relevant destination to "prohibited" ~~and initiates a subsystem status test with SSN=1. If the cause in the MTP-STATUS indication primitive indicates "unequipped user", then no subsystem status test is initiated.~~ + +- ~~3) Discontinues all subsystem status tests (including SSN=1) if an MTP-PAUSE or MTP-STATUS indication primitive is received with a cause of "unequipped SCCP". The SCCP discontinues all subsystem status tests, except for SSN=1, if an MTP-STATUS indication primitive is received with a cause of either "unknown" or "inaccessible".~~ +- 4) Initiates a local broadcast (see 5.3.6.2) of "User-out-of-service" information for each subsystem at that destination. +- 5) Initiates a local broadcast (see 5.3.6.4) of "signalling point inaccessible" information for that destination if an ~~MTP-PAUSE~~ OUT-OF-SERVICE indication primitive is received. +- 6) Initiates a local broadcast of "remote SCCP unavailable", if either an ~~MTP-PAUSE~~ OUT-OF-SERVICE indication primitive or an MTP-STATUS indication from layer management about the SCCP User Part unavailability primitive is received. + +### 5.2.3 Signalling point allowed + +When SCCP management receives an IN-SERVICE indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive relating to a destination that becomes accessible, or when it receives a subsystem allowed message relating to SSN = 1 at a remote destination which had been considered "prohibited", or when timer T(stat info) expires, SCCP management performs the following actions: + +- 1) Sets the congestion state of that signalling point if an IN-SERVICE indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive is received. +- 2) Instructs the translation function to update the translation tables. +- 3) Marks as "allowed" the status of that destination, and the SCCP, if an IN-SERVICE indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive is received. +- 4) Marks as "allowed" the status of the SCCP if a subsystem allowed message is received for SSN = 1, or if timer T(stat info) expires, or if an indication is received from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is available again. ~~The subsystem status test for SSN=1, if running, is stopped.~~ + +- 5) Marks as "allowed" the status of remote subsystems. As a national network provider option, the subsystem status can be marked as "prohibited" for a list of selected subsystems. For such subsystems, the subsystem status test procedure is initiated9. + +NOTE – This may under certain circumstances be used to solve the problem of message loss when switching back from a backup to a primary node (in case of replicated subsystems in dominant mode), where the status of the subsystem in the primary node is still unknown. + +- 6) Initiates a local broadcast (see 5.3.6.5) of "signalling point accessible" information for that destination if an IN-SERVICE.indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive is received. +- 7) Initiates a local broadcast of "remote SCCP accessible" if either an IN-SERVICE.indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive or a subsystem status allowed message is received for SSN = 1 or if timer T(stat info) expires, or if an indication is received from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is available again. +- 8) Initiates a local broadcast of "User-in-service" information for a subsystem associated with the IN-SERVICE.indication ~~MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive. + +### 5.2.4 *Signalling point congested* + +When SCCP management receives a CONGESTION.indication or an IN-SERVICE.indication ~~MTP-STATUS indication~~ primitive relating to signalling network congestion to a signalling point, SCCP management: + +- 1) Determines the severity of the congestion in the remote signalling point and updates that signalling point status to reflect the congestion as follows: +- ~~The GST MTP~~ provides a ~~single congestion level (CL)~~ ~~congestion indication (international method)~~10. + +The severity is reflected by a local internal status variable referred to as "restriction level" $RL_M$ . Each of the $N + 1$ restriction levels except the highest level is further divided into $M$ "restriction sublevels", $RSL_M$ , where: + +$N = 8$ + +$M = 4$ + +The method to compute these levels is as follows: + +CL is divided by N; + +$RL_M$ is set to the quotient of the division above; and + +$RSL_M$ is set to the remainder of the division above. + +NOTE – In the STCs, the value of congestion level "no congestion" ( $CL_{nc}$ ) must be set to "0", the value of congestion level "maximum congestion" ( $CL_{mc}$ ) must be set to " $N imes M$ ", and the value "step" for Congestion Levels ( $CL_{st}$ ) must be set to "1". + +~~The method to compute these levels uses an attack timer $T_a$ and a decay timer $T_d$ .~~ + +~~a) When timer $T_a$ is not running, then:~~ + +~~Timer $T_a$ is started and $T_d$ is (re)started.~~ + +~~if $RL_M$ is equal to N, then no further action is taken.~~ + +~~$RSL_M$ is incremented.~~ + +~~If $RSL_M$ reaches M, then $RSL_M$ is set to zero and $RL_M$ is incremented.~~ + +~~b) When timer $T_a$ is running, the MTP STATUS indication primitive is ignored.~~ + +- 2) Initiates the procedures of 5.2.8. + +When congestion abates, the traffic is gradually resumed. SCCP management: + +- 1) Decreases the restriction level ( $RL_M$ ) in a time controlled manner as follows: + +When timer $T_d$ expires, then $RSL_M$ is decremented and: + +- a) if $RSL_M$ reaches 1 and $RL_M$ is not zero, then $RSL_M$ is reset to $M-1$ and $RL_M$ is decreased by one; +- b) if either $RSL_M$ or $RL_M$ is not zero, then timer $T_d$ is restarted again. + +- 2) Initiates the procedure of 5.2.8. + +When an indication of the end of MTP RESTART is received, the associated $RL_M$ and $RSL_M$ are set to zero. + +The values of $M$ , $N$ , $T_d$ and $T_a$ parameters are administrable and provisional. + +### ***5.2.5 Local MTP network availability*** + +The SCCP will receive an indication of the end of MTP restart from each restarting local MTP SAP instance (there may be one or more MTP SAP instances in a given node). This indication is implementation dependent, see 9.2/Q.704. + +The occurrence of the end of MTP restart for a given local MTP SAP instance means that the local MTP network corresponding to that MTP SAP instance has become available to its local users, including SCCP. When SCCP management receives an indication reporting the end of a MTP Restart, then it: + +- 1) resets the congestion level of the associated signalling points; +- 2) instructs the translation function to update the translation tables, taking into account the accessibility given by the MTP indicating the end of MTP Restart; +- 3) marks as allowed the status of the SCCP and all subsystems for each accessible signalling point; +- 4) initiates a local broadcast (see 5.3.6) of "signalling point accessible" information for the signalling points becoming accessible; +- 5) initiates a local broadcast of "remote SCCP accessible" for the remote SCCPs becoming accessible; and +- 6) initiates a local broadcast of "User in service" (see 5.3.6.3) information for a subsystem associated with the end of the MTP RESTART. + +### ***5.2.6 Local MTP network unavailability*** + +Prior to the end of MTP restart for a given local MTP SAP instance, the local MTP network corresponding to that MTP SAP instance is unavailable to its local users, including SCCP. Any action taken is implementation dependent. + +### ***5.2.7 SCCP reports of SCCP and nodal congestion*** + +This subclause describes procedures related to congestion conditions that are experienced by the SCCP or node and reported by the SCCP. The SCCP notifies the originating/relay nodes sending/relaying traffic towards a congested node of the congestion. A time-controlled procedure is run at the originating/relaying node using two a-status variables, $CL_{sCL}$ and $CL_{CO}$ , which indicates the level of congestion for the connectionless and connection-oriented services at the remote node. + +If the congestion is due to a general congestion state of the node, the application of this procedure should be synchronized with equivalent measures of other affected GSTMTP-Users (e.g., BICCISUP, B-ISUP). Any procedure to synchronize or coordinate these equivalent measures is outside the scope of this Recommendation. + +#### 5.2.7.1 Actions in the congested SCCP node + +When a message arrives at a congested SCCP node, SCCP Routing Control informs SCCP management (see 2.3.1). SCMG shall return an SSC (SCCP/Subsystem-Congested) message (SSC) to the signalling point identified by the OPC in the ~~GST-SAP instance MTP routing label of the MTP-TRANSFER indication primitive and the MTP-SAP from which the message is received.~~ The *SCCP/Subsystem-Congested* message shall indicate the SPC of this congested SCCP node in the "affected PC" parameter, SSN of the SCMG ("1") in the "affected SSN" parameter, and a value in the "congestion level" parameter to indicate the severity of the congestion. Optionally, the affected SCCP service field may indicate whether the connectionless or connection-oriented service is affected or both. Any reaction towards a local originator is implementation dependent. The detection of SCCP or nodal congestion is implementation dependent. + +After reception of the first message by the congested SCCP node, the SSC (SCCP/subsystem-congested) message will be repeated only on the reception of every P-th message regardless of the OPC. + +P is provisionally set to 8. + +#### 5.2.7.2 Action in a relay or originating node + +When a *SCCP/Subsystem-Congested* message is received from the congested SCCP, and the affected signalling point has been marked as "prohibited", no further action is taken. When a *SCCP/Subsystem-Congested* message is received from the congested SCCP, and the affected point code has not been marked as "prohibited", SCCP management shall compare the values of CLsCL and/or CLCO associated with the congested SCCP node with the value in the congestion level parameter indicated in the *SCCP/Subsystem-Congested* message, depending on the affected SCCP service indicated. If the CLsCL and/or CLCO has been marked with a higher congestion level, the value shall remain unchanged, or else the CLsCL and/or CLCO shall be updated with the value of the congestion level parameter of the received *SCCP/Subsystem-Congested*. If the CLsCL has been marked with a higher or same level, the timer for connectionless TconCL shall be restarted. If the CLCO has been marked with a higher or same level, the timer for connection-oriented TconCO shall be restarted. + +If the TconCL timer expires and the CLsCL has not yet reached zero, the CLsCL shall be decremented by one and timer TconCL shall be restarted. If the CLsCL is reduced to zero, the timer TconCL is stopped. + +If the TconCO timer expires and the CLCO has not yet reached zero, the CLCO shall be decremented by one and timer TconCO shall be restarted. If the CLCO is reduced to zero, the timer TconCO is stopped. + +Whenever a remote SCCP is marked as accessible (IN-SERVICE indication, MTP-RESUME, SSA (subsystem-allowed) message, indication from layer management that the peer SCCP is available of the end of MTP-restart received), the congestion levels CLsCL and CLCO stored by SCCP may be changed (network dependent). + +The SCMG shall initiate the procedure of 5.2.8 when the values of CLsCL or CLCO changes. + +The congestion levels CLsCL and CLCO are within the range 0 through 8, with 0 indicating that no congestion is present. + +### 5.2.8 *Inter- and intra-SCMG congestion reports procedure* + +This SCMG procedure uses the values of the following internal status variables: + +- 1) $RL_M$ , restriction level due to receipt of the IN-SERVICE.indication, or CONGESTION.indication primitive MTP-STATUS indication of congestion for each affected SP (see 5.2.4). +- 2) $RSL_M$ , restriction sublevel per $RL_M$ due to receipt of the IN-SERVICE.indication, or CONGESTION.indication primitive MTP-STATUS indication of congestion for each affected SP (see 5.2.4). +- 3) $CL_{SCL}$ and $CL_{CO}$ , SCCP congestion levels due to receipt of the congestion level parameter of an SSC (SCCP/subsystem-congested) message for each affected SP and $SSN = 1$ (see 5.2.7). + +The above values are used as inputs to compute the values of the following variables: + +- a) $RL_{CL}$ and $RL_{CO}$ , SCRC traffic restriction levels for each affected SP. +- b) $RSL_{CL}$ and $RSL_{CO}$ , restriction sublevels per $RL$ for each affected SP. +- c) $RIL$ , restricted importance level parameter reported to SCCP users for each affected SP. As an implementation option, SCCP users subscribed to the connectionless service can be informed of a $RIL$ related to $RL_{CL}$ . The same applies for SCCP connection-oriented users and $RL_{CO}$ . + +If there is any change in $RL_{CL}$ , $RL_{CO}$ , $RSL_{CL}$ or $RSL_{CO}$ , SCRC is informed of the new values ~~of $RL$ and $RSL$~~ . + +If there is any change in restricted importance level, the local broadcast procedure (see 5.3.6.6) is initiated to report the new value of restricted importance level. + +NOTE – The computation is left for further study. + +## 5.3 *Subsystem status management* + +NOTE – The SCCP congestion control procedures may be subject to improvement pending further analysis of the impact of these procedures in different network scenarios and based on the results of operational experience. + +### 5.3.1 *General* + +Subsystem status management updates the subsystem status based on the information of failure, withdrawal, and recovery of subsystems. This allows alternative routing to backup subsystems, if appropriate. Concerned local users are informed of the status changes of other backup subsystems. Subsystem status management procedures are also used to convey the status of the SCCP as a whole. + +### 5.3.2 *Subsystem prohibited* + +A subsystem prohibited message with $SSN = 1$ is not allowed. + +#### 5.3.2.1 *Receipt of messages for a prohibited subsystem (response method)* + +If SCCP routing control receives a message, whether originated locally or not, for a prohibited local system, then SCCP routing control invokes subsystem prohibited control. A *Subsystem-Prohibited* message is sent to the signalling point identified by the OPC in the ~~MTP-TRANSFER indication primitive, and the GSTMTP-SAP~~ instance if the originating subsystem is not local. If the originating subsystem is local, any action taken is implementation dependent. When many indications "message for a prohibited subsystem" are received, the number of SSP (*subsystem-prohibited*) messages sent out per time-interval may be reduced by implementation-dependent mechanisms. + +#### 5.3.2.2 Receipt of Subsystem-Prohibited message or N-STATE request primitive or local user failed + +Under one of the following conditions: + +- a) SCCP management receives an SSP (*Subsystem-Prohibited*) message about a subsystem marked allowed; or +- b) an N-STATE request primitive with "User-out-of-service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked allowed; or +- c) SCCP management detects that a local subsystem has failed, + +then SCCP management does the following: + +- 1) instructs the translation function to update the translation tables; +- 2) marks as "prohibited" the status of that subsystem; +- 3) initiates a local broadcast (see 5.3.6.2) of "User-out-of-service" information for the prohibited subsystem; +- 4) initiates the subsystem status test procedure (see 5.3.4) if the prohibited subsystem is not local; +- 5) initiates a broadcast (see 5.3.7) of SSP (*Subsystem-Prohibited*) messages to concerned signalling points; +- 6) cancels "ignore subsystem status test" and the associated timer if they are in progress and if the newly prohibited subsystem resides at the local node. + +### 5.3.3 Subsystem allowed + +Under one of the following conditions: + +- a) SCCP management receives an SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) message about a subsystem other than SSN = 1, marked prohibited; or +- b) an N-STATE request primitive with "User-in-Service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked prohibited, + +then SCCP management does the following: + +- 1) instructs the translation function to update the translation tables; +- 2) marks as "allowed" the status of that subsystem; +- 3) initiates as a local broadcast (see 5.3.6) of "User-in-service" information for the allowed subsystem; +- 4) discontinues the subsystem status test relating to that subsystem if such a test was in progress; +- 5) initiates a broadcast (see 5.3.7) of SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) messages to concerned signalling points. + +If the remote SCCP, at which the subsystem reported in the SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) message resides, is marked inaccessible, then the message is treated as an implicit indication of SCCP restart, and the procedures in 5.2.3 are executed. + +### 5.3.4 Subsystem status test + +#### 5.3.4.1 General + +The subsystem status test procedure is an audit procedure to verify the status of a SCCP or subsystem marked as prohibited. + +#### 5.3.4.2 Actions at the initiating node + +- a) A subsystem status test is initiated when an SSP (*Subsystem-Prohibited*) message is received (see 5.3.2.2). For a list of selected subsystems, the subsystems status test may also be initiated on receipt of an IN-SERVICE indication MTP\_RESUME indication primitive, a subsystem allowed message with SSN = 1 or the time-out of timer T(stat\_info), or if an indication is received from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is available again (see also 5.2.3 list item 5). + +A subsystem status test associated with a prohibited subsystem is commenced by starting a timer T(stat\_info) and marking a test in progress. No further actions are taken until the timer expires. + +Upon expiration of the timer, an SST (*Subsystem-Status-Test*) message is sent to SCCP management at the node of the prohibited subsystem and the timer is reset. + +The cycle continues until the test is terminated by another SCCP management function at that node. Termination of the test causes the timer and the "test progress mark" to be cancelled. + +- b) A subsystem status test for SSN = 1 is initiated by layer management as necessary when an MTP-STATUS indication primitive is received with "remote user inaccessibility" or "unknown" information for the SCCP at a remote signalling point. + +~~After sending an SST(SSN = 1), the node should receive either an SSA(SSN = 1) from the restarting node or it should receive an MTP-STATUS indication primitive stating User Part Unavailable. In the case where the SST receiving node has the User Part availability control and its SCCP has not yet recovered, MTP sends a User Part Unavailable (UPU) message to the SST sending node. If neither a SSA(SSN = 1) nor a MTP-STATUS indication primitive (User Part Unavailable) is received by the SST sending SCCP during the duration of the T(stat\_info) timer, then the node should assume that the previously unavailable SCCP has recovered. (This ensures backward compatibility with previous versions of this Recommendation.) If the MTP-STATUS indication primitive stating User Part Unavailable is received before timer T(stat\_info) expires, then an SST(SSN = 1) is sent to the unavailable node when timer T(stat\_info) expires. A subsystem status test associated with an inaccessible SCCP is done in the same way as for the one associated with a prohibited subsystem, the only difference being that it refers to SSN = 1.~~ + +#### 5.3.4.3 Actions at the receiving node + +When SCCP management receives an SST (*Subsystem-Status-Test*) message and there is no "ignore subsystem status test" in progress, it checks the status of the named subsystem. If the subsystem is allowed, then an SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) message is sent to the SCCP management at the node conducting the test. If the subsystem is prohibited, no reply is sent. + +In the case where the SST (*Subsystem-Status-Test*) message is testing the status of SCCP management (SSN = 1), if the SCCP at the destination node is functioning, then an SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) message with SSN = 1 is sent to SCCP management at the node conducting the test. If the SCCP is not functioning, then the GST MTP cannot deliver the SST (*Subsystem-Status-Test*) message to the SCCP. A UPU message is returned to the SST initiating node by the MTP. + +As soon as its SCCP has recovered, the restarting SCCP should broadcast an SSA (*Subsystem-Allowed*) message for SSN = 1 to all concerned nodes. The restarting SCCP should set the status to "allowed" for the SCCP and all subsystems of remote signalling points that it considers available, based on the GST-SAP instance MTP information at the node. + +### 5.3.5 Coordinated state change + +#### 5.3.5.1 General + +A duplicated subsystem may be withdrawn from service without degrading the performance of the network by using the coordinated state change procedure described below when its backup is not local. The procedure, in the case that the primary and the backup subsystems are co-located, is implementation dependent. + +#### 5.3.5.2 Actions at the requesting node + +When a duplicated subsystem wishes to go out of service, it invokes a N-COORD request primitive. SCCP management at that node sends a SOR (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Request*) message to the backup system, sets a timer T(coord.chg) and marks the subsystem as "waiting for grant". + +Arrival of a SOG (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Grant*) message at the requesting SCCP management causes the timer T(coord.chg) to be cancelled, the "waiting for grant" state to be cancelled, and a N-COORD confirm primitive to be invoked to the requesting subsystem. SSP (*Subsystem-Prohibited*) messages are broadcast (see 5.3.7) to concerned signalling points. + +In addition, an "ignore subsystem status test" timer is started and the requesting subsystem is marked as "ignore subsystem status test". Subsystem status tests are ignored until the "ignore subsystem status test" timer expires or the marked subsystem invokes a N-STATE request primitive with "User-out-of-service" information. + +If no "waiting for grant" is associated with the subsystem named in the SOG (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Grant*) message, then the SOG (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Grant*) message is discarded and no further action is taken. + +If the timer associated with the subsystem waiting for the grant expires before a SOG (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Grant*) message is received, then the "waiting for grant" is cancelled and the request is implicitly denied. + +#### 5.3.5.3 Actions at the requested node + +When the SCCP management at the node at which the backup subsystem is located receives the SOR (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Request*) message, it checks the status of local resources44. If the SCCP has sufficient resources to assume the increased load, then it invokes a N-COORD indication primitive to the backup subsystem. If the SCCP does not have sufficient resources, no further action is taken. + +If the backup system has sufficient resources to allow its duplicate to go out of service, then it informs SCCP management by invoking a N-COORD response primitive. A SOG (*Subsystem-Out-of-Service-Grant*) message is sent to SCCP management at the requesting node. If the backup subsystem does not have sufficient resources, no reply is returned44. + +NOTE – Local resources critical to this particular node are implementation dependent. + +### 5.3.6 Local broadcast + +#### 5.3.6.1 General + +The local broadcast procedure provides a mechanism to inform local allowed concerned subsystems of any related SCCP/subsystem/signalling point status information received. + +#### 5.3.6.2 User-out-of-service + +A local broadcast of "User-out-of-service" information is initiated when: + +- a) an SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) message is received about a subsystem marked allowed (see 5.3.2.2); +- b) an N-STATE request primitive with "User-out-of-service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked allowed (see 5.3.2.2)42 (see Note); +- c) a local subsystem failure is detected by SCCP management (see 5.3.2.2)42 (see Note); +- d) an ~~OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication MTP-PAUSE indication~~ primitive is received (see 5.2.2); or +- e) an ~~MTP-STATUS indication from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is unavailable primitive with cause "inaccessible" is received~~ (see 5.2.2). + +NOTE – These cases are applicable when the SCCP is used for routing between local subsystems. This function is implementation dependent. + +SCCP management then informs local allowed concerned SCCP subsystems about the subsystem status by invoking N-STATE indication primitive with "User-out-of-service" information. + +#### 5.3.6.3 User-in-service + +A local broadcast of "subsystem-in-service" information is initiated when: + +- a) an SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message is received about a subsystem marked prohibited (see 5.3.3); +- b) an N-STATE request primitive where "User-in-service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked prohibited (see 5.3.3); +- c) an ~~IN-SERVICE.indication MTP-RESUME indication~~ primitive is received (see 5.2.3, SCMG action 8)); +- d) an SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message is received with SSN = 1; about a remote SCCP marked prohibited (see 5.2.3, SCMG action 4)); +- e) timer T(stat info) expires, or; (see 5.2.3, SCMG action 4)); +- f) an indication ~~from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is available of the end of MTP-Restart is received~~ (see 5.2.5, SCMG action 6)). + +SCCP management then informs local allowed concerned SCCP subsystems, except the newly allowed one in case d) above, about the subsystem status by invoking an N-STATE indication primitive with "User-in-service" information. + +#### 5.3.6.4 Signalling point inaccessible + +A local broadcast of "signalling point inaccessible" or "remote SCCP inaccessible" information is initiated when an OUT-OF-SERVICE indication MTP-PAUSE primitive or an indication from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is unavailable MTP-STATUS primitive (with "user part unavailable" information for a SCCP) is received. SCCP management then informs local allowed concerned SCCP subsystems about the signalling point status by invoking an N-PCSTATE indication primitive with "signalling point inaccessible" or "remote SCCP inaccessible" information. + +#### 5.3.6.5 Signalling point or remote SCCP accessible + +A local broadcast of "signalling point accessible" or "remote SCCP accessible" information is initiated when an IN-SERVICE indication MTP-RESUME primitive, an SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message (with SSN = 1) message or an indication of the end of the MTP restart is received or when timer T(stat info) expires or an indication from layer management that the peer SCCP User Part is available. SCCP management then informs local allowed concerned SCCP subsystems about the signalling point status by invoking an N-PCSTATE indication primitive with "signalling point accessible" or "SCCP accessible information". + +#### 5.3.6.6 Restricted importance level reporting + +A local broadcast of "signalling point congested" information is initiated when there is any change in the "restricted importance level" (see 5.2.8). SCCP management then informs local allowed concerned SCCP subsystems about the signalling point status by invoking an N-PCSTATE indication primitive with "restricted importance level" and the new value of the restricted importance level. + +### 5.3.7 Broadcast + +#### 5.3.7.1 General + +The broadcast procedure provides a mechanism that may be used to inform concerned signalling points of any related SCCP/subsystem status change at local or adjacent signalling points. It is a procedure supplementary to that defined in 5.3.2.1. + +The procedure to inform nodes that are not "concerned" of status change is described in 5.3.2.1 and 5.3.4. + +#### 5.3.7.2 Subsystem prohibited + +A broadcast of SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) messages is initiated when: + +- a) an SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) message is received about a subsystem presently marked allowed (see 5.3.2.2), and the affected point code identified in the SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) message is the same as that of the informer signalling point; +- b) an N-STATE request primitive where "User-out-of-service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked allowed (see 5.3.2.2); or +- c) a local subsystem failure is detected by SCCP management (see 5.3.2.2). + +This broadcast permits SCCP management to inform all concerned signalling points, except the informer signalling point, about the subsystem status by SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) messages. SCCP management does not broadcast if the point code of the prohibited subsystem is different from that of the informer signalling point which originates the SSP (Subsystem-Prohibited) message. + +#### 5.3.7.3 Subsystem allowed + +A broadcast of SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) messages is initiated when: + +- a) an SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message is received about a subsystem presently marked prohibited and not equal to one (SCMG) (see 5.3.3), and the affected point code identified in the SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message is the same as that of the informer signalling point; or +- b) an N-STATE request primitive where "User-in-service" information is invoked by a subsystem marked prohibited (see 5.3.3). + +At the end of the SCCP restarting process, the restarting SCCP should broadcast an SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message for SSN = 1 to all concerned nodes. The restarting SCCP should set the status to "allowed" for the SCCP and all subsystems of the remote signalling points that it considers available based on MTP layer management information at the node. + +Broadcast of SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) messages permits SCCP management to inform all concerned signalling points, except the informer signalling point, about the subsystem status. SCCP management does not broadcast if the point code of the allowed subsystem is different from that of the informer signalling point which originates the SSA (Subsystem-Allowed) message. + +## 5.4 Local SCCP restart + +On a signalling point where SCCP restarts, an indication is given to the SCCP by layer management ~~the MTP~~ about the signalling points, which are accessible during the SCCP restart actions. The response method is used to determine the status of the SCCP and the SCCP subsystems in those signalling points, in the absence of subsystem prohibited messages. + +At the end of the SCCP restart, the status of its own subsystems is not broadcast to concerned signalling points. In this case, the response method is used to inform other nodes attempting to access prohibited subsystems at the restarted signalling points. + +At the completion of SCCP restart, the following actions shall have been taken: + +- 1) SCOC Restart (see 3.8). +- 2) Freezing the Segmentation Local Reference of the segmentation process in SCLC. +- 3) Releasing all the resources, if any used for the reassembly process in SCLC. +- 4) Local broadcast (see 5.3.6.4) of "signalling point accessible" status about the accessible signalling points. +- 5) Local broadcast of "remote SCCP accessible" status about the accessible remote SCCP. +- 6) Reset of the availability statuses related to its local sub-systems as appropriate based on implementation-dependent reporting procedures. +- 7) Updating the translation tables taking into account of the accessibility of remote signalling points reported by the ATP layer management. +- 8) Marking as "allowed" the status of the SCCP and sub-systems at remote signalling points that are reported to be available. +- 9) Computing the traffic restriction parameters $RL_M$ and $RSL_M$ associated with remote signalling points that are reported to be available. +- 10) Broadcast of SSA messages for SSN = 1 for concerned signalling points. The local SCMG shall not broadcast the statuses of its local sub-systems. +- 11) Informing the local allowed concerned sub-systems of the sub-system now available. + +On completion of the above procedures, the SCCP should be considered fully operational. + +## 9.7 Annex C – State Transition Diagrams (STD) for the signalling connection control part of Signalling Systems No. 7 + +Annex C does not apply. + +NOTE – This annex may still be consulted; however, the terminology should be adapted to the Generic Signalling Transport Service being used by this Recommendation. This concerns the names of the primitives being used, the non-visibility of OPC, DPC, etc. In addition, the ISUP embedded procedures are not supported. + +## 9.8 Annex D – State Transition Diagrams (STD) for SCCP management control + +Annex D does not apply. + +NOTE –This annex may still be consulted; however, the terminology should be adapted to the Generic Signalling Transport Service being used by this Recommendation. This concerns the names of the primitives being used, the non-visibility of OPC, DPC, etc. + +# 10 Exceptions to ITU-T Rec. Q.715 + +ITU-T Rec. Q.715 does not apply. + +# Appendix I + +## Aspects of the fully meshed Signalling Transport Network + +## I.1 GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on MTP and MTP3b + +#### 1) *MTP3* + +The fully meshed signalling transport network is realized by the relay functionality of the MTP3 layer. The assured data transport is assured by the link-by-link MTP2 connection. + +#### 2) *MTP3b* + +The fully meshed signalling transport network is realized by the relay functionality of the MTP3b layer. The assured data transport is assured by the link-by-link SSCOP connection (MTP3b). + +### I.2 GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on SSCOP and SSCOPMCE + +#### 1) *SSCOP* + +The fully meshed signalling transport network is realized by $n \times n$ SSCOP connections. The assured data transport is assured by these end-to-end SSCOP connections. + +These connections use the relay functionality of the underlying ATM transport network. + +#### 2) *SSCOPMCE* + +The fully meshed signalling transport network is realized by $n \times n$ SSCOPMCE connections. The assured data transport is assured by these end-to-end SSCOPMCE connections. + +These connections use the relay functionality of: + +- a) the underlying ATM transport network; +- b) the underlying connectionless network. + +## I.3 GST supported by the Signalling Transport Converter on SCTP + +The fully meshed signalling transport network is realized by $n \times n$ SCTP connections. The assured data transport is assured by these end-to-end SCTP connections. + +These connections use the relay functionality of the underlying connectionless IP network. + +# Appendix II + +## Differences between the SCCP and TI-SCCP operating over ITU-T Rec. Q.2150.1 + +Observing that: + +- a) When transmitting a message, the definitions in TI-SCCP require the TI-SCCP entity to pass a message to be transmitted with a TRANSFER.request primitive (see 6.7) via a particular GST-SAP to a Signalling Transport Converter (STC) instance. The STC for MTP3 or MTP3b is configured with the OPC, DPC, SI, and NI to enable completion of the MTP3 type PDUs. In SCCP, the OPC, DPC, SI, and NI values are selected properly and passed to MTP3 via an MTP-TRANSFER.request primitive. +- b) When receiving a message, the MTP3 selects a Signalling Transport Converter based on the OPC, DPC, SI, and NI values. The STC then passes the message with a TRANSFER.indication primitive via a particular GST-SAP to the TI-SCCP. This SAP identifies to the TI-SCCP the signalling relation to the TI-SCCP and, thus, identifies also the origin of the message. In SCCP, MTP3 passes the message with an MTP-TRANSFER.indication primitive to the SCCP entity. + +In both cases, this amounts to the same operation where the particulars are not visible from outside the system, i.e., the operation of TI-SCCP and SCCP when transferring messages are identical. + +On the management side, PAUSE.indication and RESUME.indication of SCCP are replaced by OUT-OF-SERVICE.indication and IN-SERVICE.indication in TI-SCCP. In TI-SCCP, congestion increase and decrease computations are performed in the STC where in SCCP this calculation takes place in the SCCP. Again, such a difference is not visible from outside the system, i.e., the operation of TI-SCCP and SCCP considering the status indications of the signalling relation are the same. + +Considering the management of neighbouring SCCPs, the only detail needing attention is the User Part Unavailable (UPU) messages that, when received by the STC are discarded, layer management is informed about this. SCCPs receive this message and react by starting a subsystem test (SST). In TI-SCCP, such an SST can be initiated by system management (see 9.6, the exceptions to 5.3.4.2/Recommendation Q.714). Such differences are again not visible from outside the system. + +In conclusion, the operation of SCCP over MTP3 or MTP3b are identical to the operations of TI-SCCP and the Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b. + +The only difference remaining is the specification that the "sequence control parameter" needs to be included in XUDT and LUDT TI-SCCP messages. + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cc27eadd7357cb3ae37913dbf3279b9e53b3953 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:53f8c2f655c260655c7636cfb09fdeeea39347f2f238c425563714a8a354c6ac +size 122610 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bb6635f7b6fdadd014517f698fd74854090d4ec0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca692cf3cc3906fa586d55d5bb2f0e66fb07f331f9a1ea5dcf1069eb0b3f64c6 +size 182447 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15850cfe20a28cd89563e120998129646bd37131 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7d95f6d4e221908f54ef0a7f79918f7f405954bcbffef34e5159776ef7564cb3 +size 33658 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b59e74f959c938b80ecf520827ab6827c71e844 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0b84cc2dc36c623e9eec7a57cc7e91ce252dab04ce67572a7c0e0023fdd3efb3 +size 132842 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68cb23fc2e418ae207a7bb96698f4a34d882b7c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cd0b0701d1cc924ede8bf7e4c37109ca1db9967f8bcd9dc249ff10ae057a3580 +size 104562 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41f9a8fbcad701461e2cb6068787dc82178297d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a7086a1a7991adc1d721caa73d9e94f4293e37c3625905cf0ea66362e7913a2c +size 27038 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22ae9ebdea9b51453430f8f1eec96d3dbc3b7c43 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e10c8f5c58c1323c42c6cd1928d748c09cc309115dcd821f1e68faff41795380 +size 8357 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abf172c8709aa6b88b66b3ea6715469de8505bd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3c93e06411be66082ccd4c5774a83961da0825fbc99adeb8ec96b2a1e09ee02d +size 85600 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b6d5cfee2d9d03079ea412a4dc39fd4108adaf08 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dcf3532d376c6de74bcdc10f982ed2a1e09940a097e9ea19d4f7877395488e3f +size 43865 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe58214f9a674d777bd111bb941199bd6aa94561 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c58bb3257a774db07287301c5bc3dea80b9d1e54edf83d0f03dd64804f76c3ca +size 178687 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f21c9ed4d3953d22557e1dd88273de454a55a291 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d09879141fe390f4e0e0124e8af3c03f0315d8f5068e01e98055b648d5533135 +size 136389 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/834fb96b114b8fdc001625e1ae28e8b1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/834fb96b114b8fdc001625e1ae28e8b1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32553aa11354a295063af08cd17b6caaa1bdae4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/834fb96b114b8fdc001625e1ae28e8b1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b52360cb2facd114df13621ec5121b3e5e44bd49e7ddc67636dfec66c697c74 +size 153480 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d61be0cb3d93ac5edfd20f3df13f8baa6689ee3e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f3cb0b79c22d75453f500c63a571d71ad8daf4fd30b7363fd873e6953fa539d2 +size 87053 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ff6f863e182e7497e81828ea70d7f28ef5947f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fa6ee778528becc5f99acef6d251c2b773ae596dc3a65e6e0d37222bbd7d8d58 +size 54650 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/bccc028d0e75bc30c41528056f581545_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/bccc028d0e75bc30c41528056f581545_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4f2839602df11a9cdabc89cf3209f8b78a5d992 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/bccc028d0e75bc30c41528056f581545_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:441684c9a2f9eedb221895e87410ce7ade1027914bca0d9fd0998f2d175cd78c +size 46446 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/cfb98c691c1af5befe32ff9442eea511_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/cfb98c691c1af5befe32ff9442eea511_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf5a2f6df3302003fafcf44d217fbf1915757bdf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/cfb98c691c1af5befe32ff9442eea511_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f91d4bd49c49ef30c6acf3329a558edf8002d24f746fbe5e31d2d2817e120917 +size 105548 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83639846b17e5d7ace39ffd875a0715a0c0da7cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c3d1e8f2c0c7112c2523a8a0996fcfe77f3bd3d631aecea2af481a1a9264f9f0 +size 153453 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/e151d3468319b81f042ca232c4d82e4b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/e151d3468319b81f042ca232c4d82e4b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d3b5791f0a2870911413da1171d64922a7daea3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/e151d3468319b81f042ca232c4d82e4b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f8340448bf98322fa55782318e0b7aa2edcbc23fd1ceb99fa6612feba50b62f6 +size 133067 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0686f095a67e5de0b6a3c7f66c1654b47f5f0b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2630.2-200012-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5cb33dd96702d118534e097ac7efec0337ac97c1ebc30cbe8c3fed71087c592c +size 94305 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931C-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931C-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22ae9ebdea9b51453430f8f1eec96d3dbc3b7c43 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931C-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e10c8f5c58c1323c42c6cd1928d748c09cc309115dcd821f1e68faff41795380 +size 8357 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931D-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931D-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..104a57fbd03964ffd2520508b2be42e03343d20f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2931D-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2468dfa77e8d32611a5fe8a2ebb904676994eeb54463226fd865698560c960c +size 8232 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27d0a0209ab83b0c3ddf23e1443a015ee95e79cd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4090d7ff74d0ab6a5bac8b0bbca64139b38f788316405d96b4846b496269fab6 +size 72321 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66b53afe4e6a0bccfbfccc4f23e1b6a600efb954 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:971386ae0dc2fe38d19f269bc302de60bbc97bc4176af45c267b0875eb64a460 +size 8283 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/605ad256780bc1b6022dfb65a6e24a3b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/605ad256780bc1b6022dfb65a6e24a3b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce2e5af09f694c57984655eff2577977b7c41ac5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/605ad256780bc1b6022dfb65a6e24a3b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4170cb9fc2cff07e521d5bb0d1e9ad7a85898032396f29e94171dfb10c276714 +size 59409 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09f2481650267db442d937f1348c3bed1f21493a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6d56e538321aa6e937799e1280fb029c86d9a9af8c11db700dd4fbaae5ca9a6a +size 50737 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a336d3d9623d2d50a81f5f917201d433214d3c23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f9057a046c58f8a6741f731fad5d409dea921cf3442c19a807d973a0e86e5e39 +size 86566 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77b0603d0aebdec06c321df041f2b8ea13ccc1ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:57877a580f5a3adfdadf8a5272ebe83ed8d3551b16d43e80da0fe36ac2569baa +size 73786 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6932e294a0d33a3c75ea3beb1f07c27a78c45975 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e64ee9e97e46467bdaadb7d25fde13b3fd296302f03eb20874924daf95e957bb +size 78718 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..993ebfcaf6e17926b58904db55db24d50608e597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:27c2826108bb69b685d136275acb70c511de6868cfbdfd765eb2487000246a9b +size 83037 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e6a42bdd3a7ef8b85a598e56d632492c2267ea0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:05f96229e339b22ee4e69be861ba1250c87ede799be161cc664d672cf7f05599 +size 81901 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..000df09f159e29362f138adbce44175646231255 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2951-199502-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:28d28eb9d02b4e759f354eeb5558122dabe8fccb49117ab1f1253a55143265aa +size 63549 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..597350198bf183a462cef91611cc21dc746957d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:30a6e102b1da0d13af03d660db963eef109c7d460e75a8e2594ffa6362039a83 +size 8212 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43651cf61e888d414130ba9ba18577d14586bccf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:69069c596f765dee13196a951c567b17fe03d873360617b65b388eb40a0cbc83 +size 45890 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da091aba99e46545ce69b6e0e55dd6114279e3d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2959-199607-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c8ba96838561164b6612f1c2a378835eb02824d3798c85e41d6e5415a83691ce +size 70710 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5bd1715b3a587fc50847d304004966466f21fed --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50a606405f6e113c99bc45a761e9826662fb99db9219576e7043fc02933a015c +size 8297 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..664803c3e21aa0874fddeeb2d33676cd16513fef --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:202e5ed0aced62c92755c817e8d8f0e6c9e263415bdd83c3d1d2f59d85c11bd6 +size 65300 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95ebdb9746c124414b0704cf54f263e69daa59be --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961.1-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,554 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.2961** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(10/95) + +**B-ISDN APPLICATION PROTOCOLS +FOR ACCESS SIGNALLING** + +--- + +**BROADBAND INTEGRATED SERVICES +DIGITAL NETWORK (B-ISDN) – +DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING +SYSTEM No. 2 (DSS 2) – +ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC PARAMETERS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 17th of October 1995. + +--- + +# NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| General information..... | 1 | +| PART 1 – ADDITIONAL SIGNALLING CAPABILITIES TO SUPPORT TRAFFIC PARAMETERS FOR THE TAGGING OPTION AND THE SUSTAINABLE CELL RATE PARAMETER SET .... | 1 | +| 1.1    Scope ..... | 1 | +| 1.2    References..... | 2 | +| 1.3    Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 1.4    Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| 1.5    Description..... | 3 | +| 1.6    Operational requirements..... | 3 | +| 1.7    Primitive and state definitions ..... | 3 | +| 1.8    Coding requirements..... | 3 | +| 1.9    Signalling procedures at the coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point ..... | 4 | +| 1.10   Signalling procedures at the $T_B$ reference point for interworking with private B-ISDNs ..... | 7 | +| 1.11   Interworking with other networks ..... | 7 | +| 1.12   Interactions with supplementary services ..... | 7 | +| 1.13   Parameter values ..... | 7 | +| 1.14   Dynamic description (SDLs) ..... | 7 | +| Appendix I – Additional definitions..... | 8 | +| I.1    Usage Parameter Control (UPC)..... | 8 | +| I.2    Interpretation of sustainable cell rate and maximum burst size ..... | 8 | +| Appendix II – Generic Cell Rate Algorithm (GCRA)..... | 8 | +| Appendix III – Relation between maximum burst size and intrinsic burst tolerance in conjunction with peak cell rate..... | 10 | +| III.1    Sustainable Cell Rate ..... | 10 | +| Appendix IV – ATM layer traffic handling capabilities and network specific codepoint..... | 12 | +| IV.1   ATM layer traffic handling capabilities..... | 12 | +| IV.2   Network specific codepoint ..... | 12 | + +# **SUMMARY** + +This Recommendation defines the operation of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2) for the handling of additional traffic parameters that may be used for basic call and connection control at the $T_B$ or at the coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point of the user-to-network interface of the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN). The additional capabilities defined in this Recommendation enable connection control and resource/bandwidth allocation to support communication between users using a connection oriented variable bit rate network provided bearer capability. + +## **BROADBAND INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (B-ISDN) – DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 2 (DSS 2) – ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC PARAMETERS** + +*(Geneva, 1995)* + +# **General information** + +This Recommendation covers the support of additional traffic parameters for the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN) at the $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point as defined in Recommendation I.413 [1] by means of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2). This Recommendation defines the DSS 2 protocol procedures, formats and functions needed to support the identified ATM traffic related additional capabilities. + +The specifications provided by this Recommendation allow for the signalling of additional traffic parameters beyond the ones already specified by Recommendation Q.2931 [2] for B-ISDN basic call/connection control at the UNI. The additional traffic parameters support a Broadband Connection-Oriented Bearer Service (BCOB) as specified in Recommendation F.811 [3], in particular for services of bearer classes “C” (VBR without timing requirements), and “X”. + +This Recommendation is part of the DSS 2 family of ITU-T Recommendations; it specifies extensions to Recommendation Q.2931, and does not repeat states, information elements, messages and procedures contained therein, but only specifies extensions related to additional traffic parameter indications. + +This Recommendation does not cover procedures for the negotiation and modification/re-negotiation of traffic parameters. + +This is a multipart Recommendation, Part 1 covers only the additional parameters required for the support of the tagging option and the support of Sustainable Cell Rate (SCR) parameter set as specified in Recommendation I.371 [4]. Other parts will be developed to support additional traffic parameters for traffic handling capabilities as they will be defined in the scope of Recommendation I.371 [4]. + +# **PART 1 – ADDITIONAL SIGNALLING CAPABILITIES TO SUPPORT TRAFFIC PARAMETERS FOR THE TAGGING OPTION AND THE SUSTAINABLE CELL RATE PARAMETER SET** + +## **1.1 Scope** + +This Recommendation covers the support of additional traffic parameters for the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN) at the $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point as defined in Recommendation I.413 [1] by means of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2). This Recommendation defines the DSS 2 protocol procedures, formats and functions needed to support the identified ATM traffic related additional capabilities. + +This Recommendation is part of the DSS 2 family of ITU-T Recommendations; it specifies extensions to Recommendation Q.2931, and does not repeat states, information elements, messages and procedures contained therein, but only specifies extensions related to additional traffic parameter indications. + +This part of the Recommendation defines the capabilities to support additional traffic parameters required for the tagging option and the Sustainable Cell Rate parameter set as defined in the Recommendation I.371 [4]. + +This part of the Recommendation does not cover procedures for the negotiation and modification/re-negotiation of traffic parameters. + +## 1.2 References + +The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. All references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the references listed below. A list of currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- [1] ITU-T Recommendation I.413 (1993), *B-ISDN user-network interface*. +- [2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 (1995), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN) – Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2) – User Network Interface (UNI) layer 3 specification for basic call/connection control*. +- [3] CCITT Recommendation F.811 (1992), *Broadband connection-oriented bearer service*. +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation I.371, *Traffic control and congestion control in B-ISDN*. +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation I.150 (1993), *B-ISDN asynchronous transfer mode functional characteristics*. +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation I.361 (1993), *B-ISDN ATM layer specification*. +- [7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2951 (1995), *Stage 3 description for number identification supplementary services using B-ISDN Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2) – Basic call*. +- [8] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2957 (1995), *Stage 3 description for additional information transfer supplementary services using B-ISDN Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2) – Basic call*. + +## 1.3 Definitions + +The definitions of Recommendation Annex J/Q.2931 [2] apply. For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following definitions apply in addition: + +**1.3.1 cell loss priority (CLP):** A one-bit indication in the header of each ATM cell. This bit indication may be used by the user to generate traffic flows with two different cell loss ratio objectives, as defined in Recommendation I.150 [5]. + +**1.3.2 traffic contract:** A traffic contract specifies the negotiated traffic and QOS characteristics of an ATM layer connection at the B-ISDN UNI (see Recommendation I.371 [4]). + +**1.3.3 traffic control:** Traffic control at the ATM layer refers to the set of actions taken by the network to avoid congested conditions. A list of traffic control functions is given in Recommendation I.371. + +**1.3.4 traffic parameters:** A traffic parameter is a specification of a particular traffic aspect. It may be quantitative or qualitative. Traffic parameters may for example describe peak cell rate, sustainable cell rate, maximum burst size, etc. + +**1.3.5 tagging:** Tagging means that CLP = 0 cells identified by the UPC function performed on CLP = 0 flow as non-confirming are converted to CLP = 1 cells and merged with the user submitted CLP = 1 traffic flow before the CLP = 0 + 1 traffic flow enters the UPC mechanism (see Recommendation I.371 [4]). + +## 1.4 Abbreviations + +The abbreviations of Annex J/Q.2931 [2] apply. For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following abbreviations apply in addition: + +| | | +|------|------------------------------| +| CAC | Connection Admission Control | +| CDV | Cell Delay Variation | +| CLR | Cell Loss Ratio | +| GCRA | Generic Cell Rate Algorithm | +| IBT | Intrinsic Burst Tolerance | +| MBS | Maximum Burst Size | +| NPC | Network Parameter Control | +| PCR | Peak Cell Rate | +| SCR | Sustainable Cell Rate | +| UPC | Usage Parameter Control | + +## 1.5 Description + +This Part specifies the signalling of additional traffic parameters beyond the ones already specified by Recommendation Q.2931 [2]. In particular, the following additional capabilities are specified: + +- support of traffic parameters for statistical multiplexing using SCR parameter set (sustainable cell rate, maximum burst size); +- use of the “tagging option”. + +## 1.6 Operational requirements + +### 1.6.1 Provision and withdrawal + +The additional traffic indications may be included in signalling messages by the user as specified in this Recommendation without any prior arrangement with the service provider. + +### 1.6.2 Requirements at the originating network side + +The procedures according to 1.9 shall apply. + +### 1.6.3 Requirements at the terminating network side + +The procedures according to 1.9 shall apply. + +## 1.7 Primitive and state definitions + +### 1.7.1 Primitive definitions + +Clause 8/Q.2931 shall apply. + +### 1.7.2 Call states + +See clause 2/Q.2931. No additional call states are defined. + +## 1.8 Coding requirements + +### 1.8.1 Messages + +No additional messages are specified beyond the ones of 3.1/Q.2931. The existing Q.2931 messages that have had their contents modified to support the additional traffic parameters are described below. + +#### 1.8.1.1 SETUP + +Only the maximum length of the ATM traffic descriptor information element included in the SETUP message is changed from 20 to 30 octets to allow inclusion of additional traffic descriptor parameters. + +#### 1.8.1.2 CONNECT + +This message is sent by the called user to the network and by the network to the calling user to indicate call acceptance by the called user. See Table 1 for additions to the structure of this message shown in Table 3-2/Q.2931. + +TABLE 1/Q.2961 + +##### CONNECT message additional content + +| Message type: CONNECT
Significance: global
Direction: both | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------|----------|--------| +| Information element | Reference | Direction | Type | Length | +| ATM traffic descriptor | 8.2.1/Q.2961 | Both | O (Note) | 4-6 | +| NOTE – Included in the user-to-network direction only when the SETUP message contained an ATM traffic descriptor information element with the Tb parameter set to “1”. Included in the network-to-user direction only when the SETUP message contained an ATM traffic descriptor information element with the Tf parameter set to “1”. In this message this information element has only local significance and contains only octets 1, 2, 3, 4, 17 and 17.1. | | | | | + +### 1.8.2 Information elements + +See clause 4/Q.2931. The coding of the ATM traffic descriptor information element is extended and is shown in 1.8.2.1. + +#### 1.8.2.1 ATM traffic descriptor + +The ATM traffic descriptor information element is specified in Recommendation Q.2931 and is extended as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. The maximum length of this information element is 30 octets. + +## 1.9 Signalling procedures at the coincident SB and TB reference point + +The procedures for basic call/connection control as defined in clause 5/Q.2931 [2] shall apply. Only additional procedures to handle the additional traffic parameters that may be present in the ATM traffic descriptor information element are indicated in the following subclauses. + +### 1.9.1 Procedures for the support of Sustainable Cell Rate parameter set + +The calling party initiates call establishment as specified in 5.1/Q.2931 and 5.2/Q.2931. The rules for selection of traffic parameters for a given direction are specified below: + +- PCR for CLP = (0 + 1) is a mandatory parameter. +- The value of the Sustainable Cell Rate must be less than that for Peak Cell Rate. +- The tagging option may only be used when the traffic descriptor IE includes a parameter on CLP = 0. +- There is a relationship between MBS and Intrinsic Burst Tolerance (IBT) which also depends on the SCR and PCR (see Appendix III). +- The Sustainable Cell Rate and Maximum Burst Size must be provided together for the same CLP indication, for a given direction. +- Forward and backward direction are independent from each other, i.e. the forward direction may use one combination of traffic parameters, while the backward direction uses a different combination of traffic parameters. + +Allowable combinations will depend on the ATM layer traffic handling capabilities. + +| Bits | | | | | | | | Octets | +|--------------------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|----|----|-----------------------------| +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | +| | | | | | | | | 1 to 8
see Q.2931 (Note) | +| Forward Sustainable Cell Rate Id. (CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 9* | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| Forward | | | | | | | | 9.1* | +| Sustainable Cell Rate | | | | | | | | 9.2* | +| (for CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 9.3* | +| Backward Sustainable Cell Rate Id. (CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 10* | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| Backward | | | | | | | | 10.1* | +| Sustainable Cell Rate | | | | | | | | 10.2* | +| (for CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 10.3* | +| Forward Sustainable Cell Rate Id. (CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 11* | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| Forward | | | | | | | | 11.1* | +| Sustainable Cell Rate | | | | | | | | 11.2* | +| (for CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 11.3* | +| Backward Sustainable Cell Rate Id. (CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 12* | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| Backward | | | | | | | | 12.1* | +| Sustainable Cell Rate | | | | | | | | 12.2* | +| (for CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 12.3* | +| Forward Maximum Burst Size Id. (CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 13* | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| Forward | | | | | | | | 13.1* | +| Maximum Burst Size | | | | | | | | 13.2* | +| (for CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 13.3* | +| Backward Maximum Burst Size Id. (CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 14* | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| Backward | | | | | | | | 14.1* | +| Maximum Burst Size | | | | | | | | 14.2* | +| (for CLP = 0) | | | | | | | | 14.3* | +| Forward Maximum Burst Size Id. (CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 15* | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| Forward | | | | | | | | 15.1* | +| Maximum Burst Size | | | | | | | | 15.2* | +| (for CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 15.3* | +| Backward Maximum Burst Size Id. (CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 16* | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| Backward | | | | | | | | 16.1* | +| Maximum Burst Size | | | | | | | | 16.2* | +| (for CLP = 0 + 1) | | | | | | | | 16.3* | +| Traffic Management Options Identifier | | | | | | | | 17* | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| Spare | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tb | Tf | 17.1* | + +NOTE – The fields “Forward Peak Cell Rate (for CLP = 0 + 1)” and “Backward Peak Cell Rate (for CLP = 0 + 1)” are mandatory if the ATM traffic descriptor information element is included in the SETUP message. They are optional if the ATM traffic descriptor information element is included in the CONNECT message. + +FIGURE 1/Q.2961 + +#### **ATM traffic descriptor information element** + +TABLE 2/Q.2961 + +#### **ATM traffic descriptor information element** + +- Forward/backward sustainable cell rate (octets i.1-i.3, where i may have the values 9-12): + +A value expressing in pure 3 octet integer representation the number of cells per second, with bit 8 of the first octet being the most significant bit, and bit 1 of the third octet being the least significant bit. + +The “forward” direction is defined as that from the calling user to the called user. + +The “backward” direction is the reverse, i.e. from the called user to the calling user (see Annex J/Q.2931 [2]). + +- Forward/backward maximum burst size (octets i.1-i.3, where i may have the values 13-16): + +The maximum burst size is expressed in cells and is coded as pure 3 octet integer with bit 8 of the first octet being the most significant bit, and bit 1 of the third octet being the least significant bit. + +- Tb (tagging backward) (octet 17.1) + +| Bit | user-to-network (Note 1) | network-to-user (Note 2) | +|-----|--------------------------|--------------------------| +| 2 | | | +| 0 | tagging not allowed | tagging not supported | +| 1 | tagging requested | tagging supported | + +NOTE 1 – At the destination side, if octet 17.1 is omitted, a default of “tagging not allowed” shall apply. At the originating side, the field is spare. + +NOTE 2 – At the destination side, if octet 17.1 is omitted, a default of “tagging not supported” shall apply. At the originating side, the field is spare. + +- Tf (tagging forward) (octet 17.1) + +| Bit | user to network (Note 3) | network to user (Note 4) | +|-----|--------------------------|--------------------------| +| 1 | | | +| 0 | tagging not allowed | tagging not applied | +| 1 | tagging requested | tagging applied | + +NOTE 3 – At the originating side, if octet 17.1 is omitted, a default of “tagging not allowed” shall apply. At the destination side, the field is spare. + +NOTE 4 – At the originating side, if octet 17.1 is omitted, a default of “tagging not applied” shall apply. At the destination side, the field is spare. + +### **1.9.2 Handling of the traffic management options field for the local support of tagging** + +#### **1.9.2.1 Procedures applicable at the originating interface** + +The calling user, by use of the Tf subfield in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, may indicate in the SETUP message that tagging requested or not allowed for the user plane traffic in the forward direction (See Recommendation I.371 [4] for definition of tagging). + +When the network receives a SETUP message with the Tf subfield set to “tagging requested”, and the network accepts the request to apply tagging for the user plane traffic in the forward direction, the network shall upon call acceptance include an ATM traffic descriptor information element in the CONNECT message, set the Tf subfield to “tagging applied”. Otherwise, the network shall not apply tagging and take one of the following actions: + +- 1) include upon call acceptance an ATM traffic descriptor information element in the CONNECT message with Tf subfield “tagging not applied”; +- 2) not include upon call acceptance an ATM traffic descriptor information element in the CONNECT message. + +#### **1.9.2.2 Procedures applicable at the destination interface** + +When the network sends a SETUP message, and the network supports the tagging option for the user plane traffic in the backward direction (see 2.3.1/I.371), the network shall include a Traffic Management Options in this message with the Tb subfield set to “tagging supported”. If the network does not support the tagging option, the network shall take one of the following actions: + +- 1) include a Traffic Management Options field in the ATM traffic descriptor information element in the SETUP message with the Tb subfield set to “tagging not supported”; + +- 2) not include a Traffic Management Options field in the ATM traffic descriptor information element in the SETUP message. + +When the user receives a SETUP message with the Tb subfield set to "tagging supported", and the user wishes to request tagging, the user shall upon call acceptance include an ATM traffic descriptor information element in the CONNECT message with the Tb subfield set to "tagging requested". Otherwise, the user shall take one of the following actions: + +- 1) include an ATM traffic descriptor information element with the Tb subfield set to "tagging not allowed" in the CONNECT message; +- 2) not include ATM traffic descriptor information element in the CONNECT message. + +When the network had indicated to the user that it supports tagging, and it receives a CONNECT message which contains an ATM traffic descriptor information element with Tb subfield set to "tagging requested", the network shall apply tagging for the user plane traffic in the backward direction. Otherwise, it shall not apply tagging. + +### **1.9.3 Handling of specific error conditions** + +When the SETUP message is received with an ATM traffic descriptor information element which contains a combination of traffic parameters that is not allowed (see 1.9.1) the ATM traffic descriptor information element shall be treated as a mandatory information element received with content error (see 5.6.7.2/Q.2931). + +## **1.10 Signalling procedures at the TB reference point for interworking with private B-ISDNs** + +The procedures of 1.9 shall apply. + +## **1.11 Interworking with other networks** + +### **1.11.1 Interaction with entities which do not support the Q.2961 capabilities** + +If an entity which does not support the capabilities described in this Part receives an ATM traffic descriptor information element in a SETUP message with the additional fields defined in 1.8.2, it shall follow the procedures described in 5.6/Q.2931, 5.7/Q.2931 and 5.8/Q.2931 [2]. + +### **1.11.2 Interworking with N-ISDN** + +It is not possible to interwork these capabilities with an N-ISDN entity. + +## **1.12 Interactions with supplementary services** + +The support of the capabilities covered by this Part have no impact on the support of CLIP, CLIR, COLP, COLR, DDI, SUB, UUS and MSN supplementary services as specified in Recommendations Q.2951 [7] and Q.2957 [8]. + +## **1.13 Parameter values** + +Not applicable for this Recommendation. + +## **1.14 Dynamic description (SDLs)** + +Not applicable for this Recommendation. + +# Appendix I + +## Additional definitions + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +It should be noted that Study Group (SG) 13 is producing the definitive work in this area. Therefore the informative text in this appendix will be superseded by I.371 text when available. In the event of conflict, Recommendation I.371 takes precedence over the contents of this appendix. + +## I.1 Usage Parameter Control (UPC) + +Usage parameter control is the set of actions taken by the network to monitor and control traffic in terms of traffic offered and validity of the ATM connection, at the user access. Its main purpose is to protect network resource from malicious as well as unintentional misbehaviour which can affect the QOS of other already established connections by detecting violations of negotiated parameters and taking appropriate actions. + +## I.2 Interpretation of sustainable cell rate and maximum burst size + +SCR and MBS are traffic parameters the calling user may use, if the user can upper bound the realized mean cell rate of the ATM connection to a value below the PCR. If used, the calling user must include both parameters. Note that the PCR for CLP = 0 + 1 traffic is a mandatory parameter of the ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +The SCR is an upper bound on the possible conforming “mean rate” of an ATM connection, where “mean rate” is the number of cells transmitted divided by the “duration of the connection”, where in this case, the “duration of the connection” is the time from the emission of the first cell until the state of the GCRA for the SCR returns to zero after the emission of the last cell of the connection. + +SCR and MBS are defined as parameters of the GCRA (see Appendix II). Enforcement of this parameter set could allow the network operator to allocate sufficient resources for statistical multiplexing using SCR parameter set (sustainable cell rate, maximum burst size), but less than those based on the PCR, and still ensure that the performance objectives (e.g. for cell loss ratio) can be achieved. Further details for the interpretation of the SCR are provided in Appendix III. + +NOTE – The SCR parameter set values (indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element) specify the sum of both the user plane information and end-to-end user originated OAM F5 flows. Accordingly no additional OAM traffic descriptor for SCR is needed. + +# Appendix II + +## Generic Cell Rate Algorithm (GCRA) + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +It should be noted that Study Group 13 is producing the definitive work in this area. Therefore the informative text in this appendix will be superseded by I.371 text when available. In the event of conflict, Recommendation I.371 takes precedence over the contents of this appendix. + +The Generic Cell Rate Algorithm (GCRA) is a virtual scheduling algorithm or a continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm as defined by the flowchart in Figure II.1. The GCRA is used to define, in an operational manner, a relationship between a cell rate and an associated tolerance (e.g. between PCR and CDV tolerance, or between SCR and MBS). In addition, for the cell flow of an ATM connection, the GCRA is used to specify the conformance at the UNI to declared values of the above two tolerances. + +For each cell arrival, the GCRA determines whether the cell is conforming with the traffic contract of the connection, and thus the GCRA is used to provide the formal definition of traffic conformance to the traffic contract. Although traffic conformance is defined in terms of the GCRA, the network provider is not obligated to use this algorithm (or this algorithm with the same parameter values) for the Usage Parameter Control (UPC). Rather, the network provider may use any UPC as long as the operation of the UPC does not violate the QOS objectives of a compliant connection. + +The GCRA depends only on two parameters: the increment $I$ and the limit $L$ . These parameters have been denoted by $T$ and $\tau$ respectively in Annex A/I.371, but have been given more generic labels herein since the GCRA will be used in multiple instances. The notation “GCRA( $I$ , $L$ )” means the generic cell rate algorithm with the value of the increment parameter set equal to $I$ and the value of the limit parameter set equal to $L$ . + +The GCRA is formally defined in Figure II.1. Figure II.1 is a generic version of Figure A.1/I.371. The two algorithms in Figure II.1 are equivalent in the sense that for any sequence of cell arrival times, $\{t_a(k), k \geq 1\}$ the two algorithms determine the same cells to be conforming and thus the same cells to be non-conforming. The two algorithms are easily compared if one notices that at each arrival epoch, $t_a(k)$ , and after the algorithms have been executed, $TAT = X + LCT$ , see Figure II.1. An explanation of each algorithm follows. + +The virtual scheduling algorithm updates a Theoretical Arrival Time (TAT), which is the “nominal” arrival time of the cell assuming equally spaced cells when the source is active. If the actual arrival time of a cell is not “too” early relative to the TAT, i.e. if the actual arrival time is after $TAT - L$ , then the cell is conforming, otherwise the cell is non-conforming. + +Tracing the steps of the virtual scheduling algorithm in Figure II.1, at the arrival time of the first cell $t_a(1)$ , the theoretical arrival time TAT is initialized to the current time, $t_a(1)$ . For subsequent cells, if the arrival time of the $k^{\text{th}}$ cell, $t_a(k)$ , is actually after the current value of the TAT then the cell is conforming and TAT is updated to the current time $t_a(k)$ , plus the increment $I$ . If the arrival time of the $k^{\text{th}}$ cell is greater than or equal to $TAT - L$ but less than TAT (i.e. as expressed in Figure II.1, if TAT is less than or equal to $t_a(k) + L$ ), then again the cell is conforming, and the TAT is increased by the increment $I$ . Lastly, if the arrival time of the $k^{\text{th}}$ cell is less than $TAT - L$ (i.e. if TAT is greater than $t_a(k) + L$ ), then the cell is non-conforming and the TAT is unchanged. + +The continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm can be viewed as a finite-capacity bucket whose real-valued content drains out at a continuous rate of 1 unit of content per time-unit and whose content is increased by the increment $I$ for each conforming cell. Equivalently, it can be viewed as the work load in a finite-capacity queue or as a real-valued counter. If at a cell arrival the content of the bucket is less than or equal to the limit value, $L$ , then the cell is conforming, otherwise the cell is non-conforming. The capacity of the bucket (the upper bound on the counter) is $L + I$ . + +Tracing the steps of the continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm in Figure II.1, at the arrival time of the first cell $t_a(1)$ , the content of bucket, $X$ , is set to zero and the last conformance time (LCT) is set to $t_a(1)$ . At the arrival time of the $k^{\text{th}}$ cell, $t_a(k)$ , first the content of the bucket is provisionally updated to the value $X'$ , which equals the content of the bucket, $X$ , after the arrival of the last conforming cell minus the amount the bucket has drained since that arrival, where the content of the bucket is constrained to be non-negative. Second, if $X'$ is less than or equal to the limit value $L$ , then the cell is conforming, and the bucket content $X$ is set to $X'$ plus the increment $I$ for the current cell, and the last conformance time LCT, is set to the current time $t_a(k)$ . If, on the other hand, $X'$ is greater than the limit value $L$ , then the cell is non-conforming and the values of $X$ and LCT are not changed. + +![Flowcharts for Virtual scheduling algorithm and Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm. Both start with 'Arrival of a cell at time t_a(k) at a given interface, T_B or inter-network interface, on the ATM connection'. The Virtual scheduling algorithm checks if t_a(k) < TAT - L. If Yes, it's a 'Non-conforming cell'. If No, it's a 'Conforming cell' and TAT = max(t_a(k), TAT) + I. The Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm updates X' = X - (t_a(k) - LCT), then checks if X' > L. If Yes, it's a 'Non-conforming cell'. If No, it's a 'Conforming cell' and X = max(0, X') + I, LCT = t_a(k). Both algorithms have a 'next cell' loop back to the start.](4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start[Arrival of a cell at time t_a(k) at a given interface, T_B or inter-network interface, on the ATM connection] --> VSA_Start[Virtual scheduling algorithm] + Start --> CS_Start[Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm] + + subgraph "Virtual scheduling algorithm" + VSA_Start --> VSA_Dec{t_a(k) < TAT - L ?} + VSA_Dec -- Yes --> VSA_Non[Non-conforming cell] + VSA_Dec -- No --> VSA_Conf[TAT = max(t_a(k), TAT) + I +Conforming cell] + VSA_Non --> VSA_Next[next cell] + VSA_Conf --> VSA_Next + VSA_Next --> Start + end + + subgraph "Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm" + CS_Start --> CS_Calc[X' = X - (t_a(k) - LCT)] + CS_Calc --> CS_Dec{X' > L ?} + CS_Dec -- Yes --> CS_Non[Non-conforming cell] + CS_Dec -- No --> CS_Conf[X = max(0, X') + I +LCT = t_a(k) +Conforming cell] + CS_Non --> CS_Next[next cell] + CS_Conf --> CS_Next + CS_Next --> Start + end + +``` + +Flowcharts for Virtual scheduling algorithm and Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm. Both start with 'Arrival of a cell at time t\_a(k) at a given interface, T\_B or inter-network interface, on the ATM connection'. The Virtual scheduling algorithm checks if t\_a(k) < TAT - L. If Yes, it's a 'Non-conforming cell'. If No, it's a 'Conforming cell' and TAT = max(t\_a(k), TAT) + I. The Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm updates X' = X - (t\_a(k) - LCT), then checks if X' > L. If Yes, it's a 'Non-conforming cell'. If No, it's a 'Conforming cell' and X = max(0, X') + I, LCT = t\_a(k). Both algorithms have a 'next cell' loop back to the start. + +Virtual scheduling algorithm + +Continuous-state leaky bucket algorithm + +TAT Theoretical Arrival Time + $t_a(k)$ Time of arrival of a cell + +$X$ Value of the Leaky Bucket counter + $X'$ Auxiliary variable +LCT Last Conformance Time + +$I$ Increment + $L$ Limit + +At the time of arrival $t_a$ of the first cell of connection, $X = 0$ and LCT = $t_a(k)$ + +At the time of arrival $t_a$ of the first cell of the connection, TAT = $t_a(1)$ + +FIGURE II.1/Q.2961 +**Equivalent versions of the generic cell rate algorithm** + +# Appendix III + +## Relation between maximum burst size and intrinsic burst tolerance in conjunction with peak cell rate + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +## III.1 Sustainable Cell Rate + +It should be noted that Study Group 13 is producing the definitive work in this area. Therefore the informative text in this appendix will be superseded by I.371 text when available. In the event of conflict, Recommendation I.371 takes precedence over the contents of this appendix. + +The SCR, denoted as $\Lambda_{SCR}$ , is an upper bound on the possible conforming “mean rate” of an ATM connection, where “mean rate” is the number of cells transmitted divided by the “duration of the connection”; where in this case, the “duration of the connection” is the time from the emission of the first cell until the state of the GCRA for the SCR returns to zero after the emission of the last cell of the connection. Relative to the peak cell rate parameter, $T_{SCR}$ is greater than the peak emission interval $T_{PCR}$ where $T_{SCR}$ is the inverse of $\Lambda_{SCR}$ . + +SCR and MBS are traffic parameters the calling user may use, if the user can upper bound the realized mean cell rate of the ATM connection to a value below the PCR. If used, the calling user must include both parameters. Note that the PCR for CLP = 0 + 1 traffic is a mandatory parameter of the ATM traffic descriptor information element. The value of the SCR must be less than the PCR. For CBR connections, the user would not declare a SCR and would only declare a PCR. + +The SCR and MBS traffic parameters enable the end-user/terminal to describe the future cell flow of an ATM connection in greater detail than just the PCR. If an end-user/terminal is able to specify the future cell flow in greater detail than just the PCR, then the network provider may be able to more efficiently utilize the network resources. This directly benefits the network provider whether public or private, and in the case of public ATM networks, benefits the end-user with possible reduced charges for the connection. + +If the source wants to submit traffic that conforms to the SCR ( $\Lambda_{SCR} = 1/T_{SCR}$ ) and the intrinsic burst tolerance ( $\tau_{IBT}$ ) and the peak cell rate ( $1/T_{PCR}$ ) at the physical layer SAP of the equivalent terminal, then it offers traffic that is conforming to the GCRA( $T_{SCR}$ , $\tau_{IBT}$ ) and the peak emission interval $T_{PCR}$ [i.e. GCRA( $T_{PCR}$ , 0)]. + +The MBS together with the SCR and the GCRA determine the maximum burst size (MBS) that may be transmitted at the peak cell rate and still be in conformance with the GCRA( $T_{SCR}$ , $\tau_{IBT}$ ). The maximum burst size in number of cells is given by: + +$$MBS = \left\lfloor 1 + \frac{\tau_{IBT}}{T_{SCR} - T_{PCR}} \right\rfloor$$ + +where $\lfloor x \rfloor$ stands for the integer part of $x$ . + +In the signalling message, the burst tolerance is conveyed through the MBS which is coded in number of cells. The granularity supported by the signalling message is one cell. The MBS used to derive the value of $\tau_{IBT}$ applies at the physical layer SAP of the equivalent terminal. Note that in order to determine $\tau_{IBT}$ from the MBS, the peak cell rate also needs to be specified. By convention, the peak rate used in the calculation of $\tau_{IBT}$ is the peak cell rate of the CLP = 0 + 1 cell flow. This convention holds whether $\tau_{IBT}$ is associated with the SCR for the CLP = 0, or the CLP = 1, or the CLP = 0 + 1 cell flow of the connection. Also, given the MBS, $T_{PCR}$ , and $T_{SCR}$ , then $\tau_{IBT}$ is not uniquely determined, but can be any value in the half-closed interval: + +$$[(MBS - 1)(T_{SCR} - T_{PCR}), MBS(T_{SCR} - T_{PCR})]$$ + +Hence, in order for all parties to derive a common value for $\tau_{IBT}$ , by convention, the minimum possible value is used. Thus, given the MBS, $T_{PCR}$ , and $T_{SCR}$ , then $\tau_{IBT}$ is set equal to: + +$$\tau_{IBT} = \lceil (MBS - 1)(T_{SCR} - T_{PCR}) \rceil$$ + +Where $\lceil x \rceil$ stands for the first value above $x$ out of a generic list of values for $\tau_{IBT}$ . + +Note that over any closed time interval of length $t$ , the number of cells, $N(t)$ , that can be emitted with spacing no less than $T_{PCR}$ and still be in conformance with GCRA( $T_{SCR}$ , $\tau_{IBT}$ ) is bounded by: + +$$N(t) \leq \min \left( \left\lfloor 1 + \frac{t + \tau_{IBT}}{T_{SCR}} \right\rfloor, \left\lfloor 1 + \frac{t}{T_{PCR}} \right\rfloor \right)$$ + +Observe that if $t$ is greater than or equal to the $MBS \times T_{PCR}$ , then the first term of the above equation applies; otherwise, the second term applies. + +Note that the maximum conforming burst size, defined above, does not imply that bursts of this size with arbitrary spacing between the bursts would be conforming with the GCRA( $T_{SCR}$ , $\tau_{IBT}$ ). Rather, in order for a burst this large to be conforming, the cell stream needs to be idle long enough for the state of the GCRA associated with SCR to become zero (i.e. long enough for the continuous-state leaky bucket to become empty) prior to the burst. + +If a user chooses to specify values for the SCR and MBS traffic parameters and wishes to cell emit conforming bursts at the peak rate, then the appropriate choice of $T_{SCR}$ and $\tau_{IBT}$ depends on the minimum spacing between bursts as well as the burst size. For a cell flow of an ATM connection, if the minimum spacing between bursts at the equivalent terminal is $T_I$ and if the maximum burst size (with inter-cell spacing $T_{PCR}$ ) is $B$ , then the cell flow is conforming with $GCRA(T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})$ , if $T_{SCR}$ , $\tau_{IBT}$ are chosen at least large enough to satisfy the following equation: + +$$B = 1 + \left\lfloor \frac{\min(T_I - T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})}{T_{SCR} - T_{PCR}} \right\rfloor$$ + +where $\lfloor x \rfloor$ stands for the integer part of $x$ . + +The traffic pattern conforming with the $GCRA(T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})$ is in general not unique. Two traffic patterns are equivalent in relationship with the $GCRA(T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})$ if they both conform at the physical layer SAP with the $GCRA(T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})$ within the equivalent terminal. Therefore, any cell stream that complies with the $GCRA(T_{PCR}, 0)$ and $GCRA(T_{SCR}, \tau_{IBT})$ at the physical layer SAP has a peak cell rate of $R_p = 1/T_{PCR}$ , a mean cell rate which is bounded by $\Lambda_{SCR} = 1/T_{SCR}$ and a burst length which is bounded by $B$ . Note that the bounds $\Lambda_{SCR}$ and $B$ are achievable. For example, a periodic cell stream with period $B * T_{SCR}$ which transmits $B$ cells at the peak rate with inter burst spacing $T_I = B * (T_{SCR} - T_{PCR}) + T_{PCR}$ has peak cell rate $\Lambda$ , sustainable cell rate $\Lambda_{SCR}$ and burst length $B$ , and is compliant with both GCRAs. + +# Appendix IV + +## ATM layer traffic handling capabilities and network specific codepoint + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +## IV.1 ATM layer traffic handling capabilities + +Recommendation I.371 will be providing the specification of new ATM layer traffic handling capabilities. Part 2 of this Recommendation will contain an indication of these capabilities that will be specified in revision 1 of Recommendation I.371. The relationship between these capabilities and the Bearer Classes will be specified and it is not expected that there will be a one-to-one relationship. + +## IV.2 Network specific codepoint + +The subfield identifier coded "10111110" of the ATM traffic descriptor information element is reserved for network specific use. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02618e1c9d69bb72ac37b909dab893cd21430aee --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6df3aeb5704678ae54ee7c4613ee4fb55ab0ed7fa77543d0714802f3cb0be873 +size 8357 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a65b21daa36d157e35156e1d5c89e0669dd999c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2961F-200012-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.2961 F** + +(12/2000) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Broadband ISDN – B-ISDN application protocols for +access signalling + +--- + +**Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 +(DSS2) – Additional traffic parameters: +Abstract test suite (ATS) and partial protocol +implementation extra information for testing +(PIXIT) proforma for the network** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 F + +(Formerly CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120-Q.249 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250-Q.309 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310-Q.399 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| General aspects | Q.2000-Q.2099 | +| Signalling ATM adaptation layer (SAAL) | Q.2100-Q.2199 | +| Signalling network protocols | Q.2200-Q.2299 | +| Common aspects of B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling and network signalling and interworking | Q.2600-Q.2699 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for the network signalling | Q.2700-Q.2899 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling | Q.2900-Q.2999 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## **Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 (DSS2) – Additional traffic parameters: Abstract test suite (ATS) and partial protocol implementation extra information for testing (PIXIT) proforma for the network** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation specifies Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for the network at the $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point (as defined in ITU-T I.413 [9]) of implementations conforming to the procedures for the handling of additional traffic parameters that may be used for basic call and connection control of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS2) protocol for the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN), ITU-T Q.2961 [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. + +Other Recommendations of the Q.2961 family specify the Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma and Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS & TP) based on this Recommendation. + +NOTE – This Recommendation related to protocol conformance is published only in English; it is based on an external SDO's standard published in English. + +###### **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 F was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (2001-2004) and approved under the WTSA Resolution 1 procedure on 6 December 2000. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2001 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|----------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References ..... | 1 | +| 3 Endorsement..... | 2 | +| 4 Coverage ..... | 2 | +| 5 Modifications ..... | 3 | +| 5.1 General modifications..... | 3 | +| 5.2 Technical modifications..... | 3 | +| Appendix I – Bibliography ..... | 3 | + +## **Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 (DSS2) – Additional traffic parameters: Abstract test suite (ATS) and partial protocol implementation extra information for testing (PIXIT) proforma for the network** + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for the network at the $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point (as defined in ITU-T I.413 [9]) of implementations conforming to the procedures for the handling of additional traffic parameters that may be used for basic call and connection control of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS2) protocol for the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN), ITU-T Q.2961 [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. + +Other Recommendations of the Q.2961 family specify the Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma and Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS & TP) based on this Recommendation. + +This Recommendation is applicable to equipment, supporting capabilities for the indication of traffic parameters above of the peak cell rate at connection request time, to be attached at either side of a $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point when used as an access to the public B-ISDN. + +The ATS realizes test purposes identified in the TSS & TP part of the Recommendation and groups them according to the test suite structure given in the TSS & TP. Test purposes defined in the TSS & TP part but not testable are identified in this Recommendation. + +The supplier of a protocol implementation that is claimed to conform to capabilities defined in a Q.2961-series Recommendation is required to complete a copy of the PICS proforma and the PIXIT proforma provided by the testlab. The PIXIT proforma shall contain the tables identified in the partial PIXIT proforma part of this Recommendation and may contain additional information required by the testlab to be able to appropriately execute the test campaign. + +NOTE – No conformance test service can be provided and therefore no PICS and PIXIT proforma is required to be completed for implementation capabilities not covered by this Recommendation. Regarding capabilities coverage, refer to clause 4. + +## 2 References + +The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- [1] ITU-T Q.2961.1 (1995), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional signalling capabilities to support traffic parameters for the tagging option and the sustainable cell rate parameter set.* +- [2] ITU-T Q.2961.2 (1997), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Support of ATM transfer capability in the broadband bearer capability information element.* + +- [3] ITU-T Q.2961.3 (1997), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Signalling capabilities to support traffic parameters for the available bit rate (ABR) ATM transfer capability.* +- [4] ITU-T Q.2961.4 (1997), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Signalling capabilities to support traffic parameters for the ATM block transfer (ABT) ATM transfer capability.* +- [5] ITU-T Q.2961.5 (1999), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Additional traffic parameters for cell delay variation tolerance indication.* +- [6] ITU-T Q.2961.6 (1998), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Additional signalling procedures for the support of the SBR2 and SBR3 ATM transfer capabilities.* +- [7] ITU-T Q.2961 B (2000), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 (DSS2) – Additional traffic parameters: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) proforma.* +- [8] ITU-T Q.2931 (1995), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – User-network interface (UNI) layer 3 specification for basic call/connection control.* +- [9] ITU-T I.413 (1993), *B-ISDN user-network interface.* +- [10] ETSI EN 301 068-6 V1.1.1 (2000), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 6: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra information for testing (PIXIT) proforma specification for the network.* +- [11] ITU-T Q.2931 B (2000), *Broadband integrated services digital network (B-ISDN) – Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 (DSS2) – User-network interface (UNI) layer 3 specification for basic call/bearer control; Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) proforma.* + +## 3 Endorsement + +The text of ETSI EN 301 068-6 [10] was approved by ITU-T as Recommendation Q.2961 F with agreed modifications as given below. + +NOTE – Underlining and/or strike-out is used to highlight new or deleted text where detailed indication of modifications is necessary. + +## 4 Coverage + +This Recommendation covers ITU-T Q.2961.1 [1], Q.2961.2 [2], Q.2961.3 [3], Q.2961.4 [4] and Q.2961.6 [6]. + +NOTE – For testing of Q.2961.6, test groups for checking conformance to Q.2961.1 and Q.2961.2 shall be used with the exception of test groups 02 and 08 ("Traffic management option for support of tagging"). All the signalled parameters (valid and invalid B-BC values, valid and invalid ATM traffic descriptor values, etc.) necessary for testing Q.2961.6 requirements are entered via relevant PIXIT values. + +## 5 Modifications + +### 5.1 General modifications + +Throughout the text of ETSI EN 301 068-6 [10] replace references as shown in the following table: + +| Reference in ETSI EN 301 068-6 | Modified reference | +|--------------------------------|-------------------------------| +| EN 300 443-1 | ITU-T Q.2931 | +| EN 300 443-2 | ITU-T Q.2931 B | +| EN 301 068-1 | Q.2961-series Recommendations | +| EN 301 068-2 | ITU-T Q.2961 B | +| EN 301 068-6 | ITU-T Q.2961 F | +| Standard | Recommendation | + +#### Page 5, Intellectual Property Rights + +Delete the whole clause. + +### Page 5, Foreword + +Delete the whole clause. + +NOTE – It is replaced by the Foreword of this Recommendation. + +#### Page 6, Clause 1 Scope + +Replace the whole clause with the following: + +#### "1 Scope + +See clause 1 Scope of this Recommendation above." + +#### Page 21, History + +Delete the whole clause. + +### 5.2 Technical modifications + +NOTE – Modifications in the TTCN part of this Recommendation are described in terms of changes in the TTCN.GR representation. + +#### 5.2.1 AAL parameters IE + +In the TTCN, Declarations Part, Test Suite Type Definitions, ASN.1 Type Definitions alter definition for the type "AAL\_contents" as below: + +"OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..2047))". + +NOTE – This limitation may be removed in later versions of the TTCN part. + +## APPENDIX I + +## Bibliography + +- [A] ETSI EN 300 443-1 V1.3.5 (1998), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; B-ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call/bearer control; Part 1: Protocol specification*. + +- [B] ETSI EN 301 068-1 V1.2.4 (1998) Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 1: Protocol specification. +- [C] ETSI EN 301 068-2 V1.1.3 (2000), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 2: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma specification.* +- [D] ETSI EN 301 068-3 V1.1.2 (2000), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 3: Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification for the user.* +- [E] ETSI EN 301 068-4 V1.1.1 (2000), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 4: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for testing (PIXIT) proforma specification for the user.* +- [F] ETSI EN 301 068-5 V1.1.2 (2000), *Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN); Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. two (DSS2) protocol; Connection characteristics; ATM transfer capability and traffic parameter indication; Part 5: Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification for the network.* +- [G] ETSI ETS 300 406 (1995), *Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); Protocol and profile conformance testing specifications; Standardization methodology.* + +### SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..597b507a9a74e8d98bc7691ede3038e864c18702 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:64219ed54be9590cd4d2639b376f82fbedb4bc5d859614a09a4e09a88d1f9c07 +size 149373 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7da83ecb82b51a4cef7694858eef2c35f1986ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d77a478c5b78d330a2a6abbd32e7d0ac053d8b9c1ffe8a96476214afa6ddf7ae +size 8196 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49cdc0d71f0051ec7f4a1bcece896cff83cdacba --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cb1d1b8c1f18504a7e9a123b900be639553937b093ee88de94da4d12e62e67eb +size 160747 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33bc5579371464baf1f740b6853ded17493566bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2963.3-199805-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,560 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.2963.3** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(05/98) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Broadband ISDN – B-ISDN application protocols for +access signalling + +--- + +**Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – +Connection modification: ATM traffic descriptor +modification with negotiation by the connection +owner** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.3 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| General aspects | Q.2000–Q.2099 | +| Signalling ATM adaptation layer (SAAL) | Q.2100–Q.2199 | +| Signalling network protocols | Q.2200–Q.2299 | +| Common aspects of B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling and network signalling and interworking | Q.2600–Q.2699 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for the network signalling | Q.2700–Q.2899 | +| B-ISDN application protocols for access signalling | Q.2900–Q.2999 | + +For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations. + +## **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.2963.3** + +## **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 2 – CONNECTION MODIFICATION: ATM TRAFFIC DESCRIPTOR MODIFICATION WITH NEGOTIATION BY THE CONNECTION OWNER** + +## **Summary** + +The Q.2963 series of Recommendations belongs to the DSS 2 family of ITU-T Recommendations and specifies the procedure of the modification of traffic parameters of a call/connection in the active state. + +Recommendation Q.2963.3 defines the procedure of the ATM Traffic Descriptor modification with negotiation which is equivalent to that specified in Recommendation Q.2962. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.3 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 15th of May 1998. + +## **Keywords** + +MBS, modification, negotiation, PCR, SCR. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 1998 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +###### Page + +| | | | +|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 4 | Abbreviations ..... | 2 | +| 5 | Description ..... | 2 | +| 5.1 | Modifiable connections ..... | 2 | +| 5.2 | Modification of a point-to-point connection ..... | 3 | +| 5.3 | Negotiation during modification ..... | 3 | +| 6 | Operational requirements ..... | 3 | +| 6.1 | Provision and withdrawal ..... | 3 | +| 6.2 | Requirements on the originating network side ..... | 4 | +| 6.3 | Requirements on the destination network side ..... | 4 | +| 7 | Primitive and state definitions ..... | 4 | +| 7.1 | Primitive definitions ..... | 4 | +| 7.2 | State definitions ..... | 4 | +| 8 | Coding requirements ..... | 4 | +| 8.1 | Messages ..... | 4 | +| 8.1.1 | MODIFY REQUEST ..... | 4 | +| 8.1.2 | MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..... | 5 | +| 8.1.3 | MODIFY REJECT ..... | 5 | +| 8.1.4 | CONNECTION AVAILABLE ..... | 5 | +| 8.2 | Coding of specific message types and specific information element ..... | 5 | +| 8.2.1 | Coding of specific message type ..... | 5 | +| 8.2.2 | Coding of specific information elements ..... | 5 | +| 9 | Signalling procedures at the coincident S B and T B reference point ..... | 6 | +| 9.1 | Modification procedure at the requesting entity ..... | 6 | +| 9.1.1 | Modification request ..... | 6 | +| 9.1.2 | Modification acknowledgment ..... | 6 | +| 9.1.3 | Indication of modification rejection ..... | 6 | +| 9.1.4 | Response to STATUS messages while in the modify request state ..... | 6 | +| 9.1.5 | No response to modification request ..... | 6 | + +| | Page | | +|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 9.2 | Modification procedures at the responding entity ..... | 7 | +| 9.2.1 | Modification indication..... | 7 | +| 9.2.2 | Modification acceptance ..... | 7 | +| 9.2.3 | Modification confirmation ..... | 8 | +| 9.2.4 | Modification rejection..... | 8 | +| 9.3 | Transit entity conveyance of CONNECTION AVAILABLE messages..... | 9 | +| 10 | Procedures at the T B reference point for interworking with private B-ISDNs..... | 9 | +| 11 | Interworking with other networks ..... | 9 | +| 12 | Interworking with supplementary services..... | 9 | +| 13 | Parameter values..... | 9 | +| 14 | Dynamic description SDLs..... | 9 | +| Appendix I – | Example configuration of user and network behaviour during modification procedures ..... | 10 | +| Appendix II – | Guidelines for the use of the instruction indicator ..... | 12 | + +# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 2 – CONNECTION MODIFICATION: ATM TRAFFIC DESCRIPTOR MODIFICATION WITH NEGOTIATION BY THE CONNECTION OWNER** + +*(Geneva, 1998)* + +# **1 Scope** + +This Recommendation specifies the signalling protocol for ATM Traffic Descriptor modification with negotiation for the Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (B-ISDN) at the $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point (as defined in Recommendation I.413 [1]) by means of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 (DSS 2). This Recommendation extends the ATM Traffic Descriptor modification capability specified in Q.2963.2 to support the traffic parameter negotiation which is equivalent to that specified in Q.2962. + +In addition, this Recommendation specifies the protocol requirements at the $T_B$ reference point where the service is provided to the user via a private B-ISDN. + +The capability described in this Recommendation enables the connection owner to modify the ATM Traffic Descriptor with negotiation for call/connections that have already been established. This Recommendation specifies the procedure of the modification with negotiation of PCR, SCR and MBS using either an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element or a Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +ATM Traffic Descriptor modification with negotiation is applicable to all connection oriented telecommunication services that are based on single point-to-point calls/connections. The ATM Traffic Descriptor modification with negotiation for point-to-multipoint calls/connections is outside the scope of this Recommendation. + +This Recommendation is applicable to equipment, supporting ATM Traffic Descriptor modification with negotiation, to be attached at either side of a $T_B$ reference point or coincident $S_B$ and $T_B$ reference point when used as an access to the public B-ISDN. + +# **2 References** + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision, all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- [1] ITU-T Recommendation I.413 (1993), *B-ISDN user-network interface*. +- [2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 (1995), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – User-Network interface (UNI) Layer 3 specification for basic call/connection control*. +- [3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961.1 (1995), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – Additional traffic parameters: Additional signalling capabilities to support traffic parameters for the tagging option and the sustainable cell rate parameter set*. + +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 (1998), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – Connection characteristics negotiation during call/connection establishment phase.* +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.1 (1996), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – Connection modification: Peak cell rate modification by the connection owner.* +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.2 (1997), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – Connection modification: Modification procedures for sustainable cell rate parameters.* + +# 3 Definitions + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, the definitions in clause 3/Q.2963.1 apply. + +# 4 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|--------|-----------------------------------------------| +| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer mode | +| B-ISDN | Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network | +| CLP | Cell Loss Priority | +| MBS | Maximum Burst Size | +| PCR | Peak Cell Rate | +| SCR | Sustainable Cell Rate | +| UNI | User-Network Interface | +| VC | Virtual Channel | + +# 5 Description + +The description given in clause 5/Q.2963.2 shall apply with the following addition: + +- 4) The following negotiation capabilities are applicable in the modification procedure: + - negotiation of sets of traffic parameters in the ATM traffic descriptor using an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor; and + - negotiation of individual traffic parameters in the ATM traffic descriptor using a Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor. + +## 5.1 Modifiable connections + +Subclause 5.1/Q.2963.2 shall apply with the replacement of its fourth paragraph with the following sentences. + +During the modification with negotiation of the ATM traffic descriptor, the following rule applies: + +- *Traffic parameters in the backward direction* +When the entity sends a MODIFY REQUEST message that includes a Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element, the traffic descriptor for the connection that applies to this entity's reception until completion of the modification procedure is a traffic descriptor for which the parameter values are determined by taking the maximum of the existing value, the value (if any) specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, and the value (if any) specified in the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element. When the entity sends a MODIFY REQUEST message that includes + +an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the traffic descriptor for the connection that applies to this entity's reception until completion of the modification procedure is a traffic descriptor for which the parameter values are determined by taking the maximum of the existing value, the value (if any) specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, and the value (if any) specified in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +### - *Traffic parameters in the forward direction* + +When the entity sends a MODIFY REQUEST message that includes a Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element, the traffic descriptor for the connection that applies to this entity's transmission until completion of the modification procedure is a traffic descriptor for which the parameter values are determined by taking the minimum of the existing value, the value (if any) specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, and the value (if any) specified in the Minimum Acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +When the entity sends a MODIFY REQUEST message that includes an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the traffic descriptor for the connection that applies to this entity's transmission until completion of the modification procedure is a traffic descriptor for which the parameter values are determined by taking the minimum of the existing value, the value (if any) specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, and the value (if any) specified in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +## 5.2 Modification of a point-to-point connection + +Subclause 5.2/Q.2963.2 shall apply. + +## 5.3 Negotiation during modification + +This Recommendation supports the traffic parameter negotiation in their modification procedure by using an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor or a minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor. + +When an Alternative ATM traffic descriptor is used, the parameters of this information element are handled as a single set, whereas a Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element allows the specification of a range of values for parameters which are then handled independently for the selection of their respective value. Both the use of Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element and of the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element allows negotiation of any relevant ATM-related traffic parameters (i.e. peak cell rate, sustainable cell rate and maximum burst size traffic parameters, depending on the ATM transfer capability actually used for the connections). + +# 6 Operational requirements + +The provision of the connection modification capability is a service provider option. + +## 6.1 Provision and withdrawal + +It is a user and a network option to provide the procedures described in this Recommendation. If implemented, the procedures of this Recommendation may be provided as a subscription option to the served user on the origination side. + +## 6.2 Requirements on the originating network side + +See 6.1 above. + +## 6.3 Requirements on the destination network side + +See 6.1 above. + +# 7 Primitive and state definitions + +## 7.1 Primitive definitions + +Clause 8/Q.2931 shall apply. No additional primitives between DSS 2 layer 3 and the Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer are defined for the purpose of this Recommendation. + +## 7.2 State definitions + +Subclause 7.2/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +# 8 Coding requirements + +## 8.1 Messages + +For the establishment of call/connections, the messages described in Recommendations Q.2931 and Q.2961 remain valid, and do not have to be enhanced. In order to support the modification with negotiation, the following messages are used. + +- MODIFY REQUEST; +- MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT; +- MODIFY REJECT; +- CONNECTION AVAILABLE. + +### 8.1.1 MODIFY REQUEST + +This message is sent from the modification requesting entity to the modify responding entity to request modification of a single connection. See Table 8-1 for additions to the structure of this message shown in 8.1.1/Q.2963.1 and in 8.1/Q.2963.2. + +**Table 8-1/Q.2963.3 – MODIFY REQUEST message additional content** + +| Message type: MODIFY REQUEST
Significance: Global
Direction: Both | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------|----------|--------| +| Information element | Reference | Direction | Type | Length | +| Alternative ATM traffic descriptor | 8.2.1/Q.2962 | Both | O (Note) | 4-28 | +| Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor | 8.2.2/Q.2962 | Both | O (Note) | 4-28 | +| NOTE – Either the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element or the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element, but not both, shall be included in the MODIFY REQUEST message when traffic parameters are negotiable. | | | | | + +### 8.1.2 MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT + +This message is sent by the modification responding entity to indicate that the modify request is accepted. See Table 8-2 for additions to the structure of this message shown in 8.1.2/Q.2963.1. + +**Table 8-2/Q.2963.3 – MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGMENT message additional content** + +| Message type: MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Significance: Global
Direction: Both | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------|--------| +| Information element | Reference | Direction | Type | Length | +| ATM traffic descriptor | 4.5.6/Q.2931
8.2.1/Q.2961.1 | Both | O (Note) | 8-30 | +| NOTE – Included to specify the traffic parameter values allocated for the modification if one or more traffic parameters were negotiable in the MODIFY REQUEST message. | | | | | + +### 8.1.3 MODIFY REJECT + +Subclause 8.1.3/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +### 8.1.4 CONNECTION AVAILABLE + +Subclause 8.1.4/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +## 8.2 Coding of specific message types and specific information element + +### 8.2.1 Coding of specific message type + +Subclause 8.2.1/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +### 8.2.2 Coding of specific information elements + +For the establishment of call/connections, the information elements described in Recommendations Q.2931 and Q.2961 remain valid, and do not have to be enhanced. In order to support the modification with negotiation, the following information elements have to be supported. + +#### 8.2.2.1 Broadband report type + +Subclause 8.2.2/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +#### 8.2.2.2 Alternative ATM traffic descriptor + +Subclause 8.2.1/Q.2962 shall apply with the replacement of the last paragraph with the following paragraph: + +The Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element can have any combination of traffic parameters that is allowed for the ATM traffic descriptor information element for the specified broadband bearer capability. Within a single MODIFY REQUEST message, the combination of traffic parameters may be different for these two information elements. However, a traffic parameter can be set in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element only if the traffic parameter was assigned to the connection during connection establishment. The alternative bandwidth requirements must be lesser than the parameter values included in the ATM traffic descriptor. + +#### **8.2.2.3 Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor** + +Subclause 8.2.2/Q.2962 shall apply with the replacement of "SETUP" in the last paragraph with "MODIFY REQUEST". + +# **9 Signalling procedures at the coincident SB and TB reference point** + +NOTE – When the OAM traffic descriptor information element is present, the allocation of bandwidth for OAM flow is based on the ATM traffic descriptor agreed (e.g. as received in the MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE message.) Since the OAM flow allocation is bidirectional (see Note 2 of Table 4-22/Q.2931) the available user cell rate in one direction can be affected by negotiation of bandwidth in the other direction. + +## **9.1 Modification procedure at the requesting entity** + +### **9.1.1 Modification request** + +Subclause 9.1.1/Q.2963.1 and clause 9/Q.2963.2 shall apply with the following addition: + +The requesting entity initiates the modification with negotiation of the connection characteristics by including, in addition to the ATM traffic descriptor information element, either the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element or the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, but not both, in the MODIFY REQUEST message. In the case of the use of the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the parameters of the information element are handled as a single entity whereas the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element allows the specification of a range of values for parameters which are handled independently. The alternative bandwidth requirements must be less than the parameter values included in the ATM traffic descriptor. If the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element is used, the traffic parameter values indicated shall be less than the corresponding traffic parameter values specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element. The traffic parameter values specified in the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information can be either greater or less than the existing values. + +### **9.1.2 Modification acknowledgment** + +Subclause 9.1.2/Q.2963.1 shall apply with the following addition: + +In case of modification with negotiation, a transit entity and a terminating entity shall allocate the resources which correspond to the ATM traffic descriptor included in the MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE message. If an ATM traffic descriptor is not included in the MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGMENT message, the ATM traffic descriptor in the MODIFY REQUEST message shall be used for resource allocation. + +### **9.1.3 Indication of modification rejection** + +Subclause 9.1.3/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +### **9.1.4 Response to STATUS messages while in the modify request state** + +Subclause 9.1.4/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +### **9.1.5 No response to modification request** + +Subclause 9.1.5/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +## **9.2 Modification procedures at the responding entity** + +### **9.2.1 Modification indication** + +Subclause 9.2.1/Q.2963.1 and clause 9/Q.2963.2 shall apply with the following addition: + +In case of modification with negotiation, the MODIFY REQUEST message may include the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor or the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor in addition to the ATM traffic descriptor. + +### **9.2.2 Modification acceptance** + +Subclause 9.2.2/Q.2963.1 and clause 9/Q.2963.2 shall apply with the following addition: + +In case of modification with negotiation, the MODIFY REQUEST message may include the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor or the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor in addition to the ATM traffic descriptor. + +When the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element is included in the MODIFY REQUEST message and the responding entity is able to provide the traffic parameter values specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element, the entity shall: + +- if a transit entity: + - progress the modification request with both the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element; +- if a terminating entity: + - progress the modification request with the ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +When the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element is included in the MODIFY REQUEST message and the responding entity is able to provide the traffic parameter values specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the entity is able to provide the traffic parameter values specified in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the entity shall: + +- if a transit entity: + - progress the modification request with both the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element; +- if a terminating entity: + - progress the modification request with the ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +When the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element is included in the MODIFY REQUEST message and the responding entity is able to provide the traffic parameter values specified in the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the entity is not able to provide the traffic parameter values specified in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the entity shall progress the modification request with the ATM traffic descriptor information element and without the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +#### **9.2.2.1 Minimum acceptable ATM traffic parameter negotiation** + +If the responding entity is not able to provide some of the traffic parameter values indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element is included, the following procedures shall apply: + +If the responding entity is not able to provide some of the traffic parameter values indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element but is able to provide at least their corresponding traffic parameter values in the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element, the + +responding entity shall progress the modification request after adjusting the traffic parameter values in the ATM traffic descriptor information element to the values which can be supported. The adjusted parameter values will support at least the corresponding minimum acceptable values. The responding entity shall act as follows: + +- if a transit entity: + - if some of the parameters in the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element are still less than the corresponding parameters in the modified ATM traffic descriptor information element, then the modification shall be progressed with the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element containing all such parameters, in addition to the adjusted ATM traffic descriptor information element. Otherwise, the modification shall progress with the adjusted ATM traffic descriptor information element and without the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element; +- if a terminating entity: + - the modification shall be progressed with the adjusted ATM traffic descriptor information element. + +If the responding entity is not able to provide at least the traffic parameter values indicated in the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element, the responding entity shall reject the modification request. + +#### **9.2.2.2 Alternative traffic parameter negotiation** + +If the responding entity is not able to provide some of the traffic parameter values indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element and the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element is included, the following procedures shall apply: + +If the responding entity is not able to provide the ATM traffic descriptor indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element but is able to provide the ATM traffic descriptor indicated in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the responding entity shall progress the modification request by using the contents of the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element as the ATM traffic descriptor. + +If the responding entity can provide neither the ATM traffic descriptor indicated in the ATM traffic descriptor information element nor the ATM traffic descriptor indicated in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element, the responding entity shall reject the modification request. + +The MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE message returned by the terminating entity shall include the ATM traffic descriptor which indicates the finally accepted parameters. The transit entity shall allocate the resources which correspond to this ATM traffic descriptor. If the ATM traffic descriptor is not included in the MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGMENT message, the transit entity shall use the ATM traffic descriptor in the MODIFY REQUEST message for resource allocation. + +### **9.2.3 Modification confirmation** + +Subclause 9.2.3/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +### **9.2.4 Modification rejection** + +Subclause 9.2.4/Q.2963.1 shall apply with the following addition: + +When both the Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor and the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information elements are present in a MODIFY REQUEST message, the modification request shall be rejected with cause #73, "unsupported combination of traffic parameters". + +If the parameters of the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor information element or Minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information element are not according to the allowed combinations as specified in 8.2.2.2 and 8.2.2.3 respectively, the network shall handle these information elements as if they were non-mandatory information elements with content error as specified in 5.6.8/Q.2931. + +## **9.3 Transit entity conveyance of CONNECTION AVAILABLE messages** + +Subclause 9.3/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +# **10 Procedures at the TB reference point for interworking with private B-ISDNs** + +The procedures specified in clause 9/Q.2963.2 shall apply. + +# **11 Interworking with other networks** + +No interworking with other networks has been identified. + +# **12 Interworking with supplementary services** + +Clause 12/Q.2963.2 shall apply. + +# **13 Parameter values** + +The parameter values specified in clause 13/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +# **14 Dynamic description SDLs** + +The SDLs specified in clause 14/Q.2963.1 shall apply. + +# APPENDIX I + +## Example configuration of user and network behaviour during modification procedures + +These examples show the configuration in which both the initiating and the addressed users are terminating entities. + +![Sequence diagram showing the procedure of modification without request of connection acknowledgement between an Initiating User, a Network, and an Addressed User. The diagram includes message exchanges (MODIFY REQUEST, MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE) and various parameter change indicators (UPC, ATM traffic parameters, CAC).](1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between an Initiating User, a Network, and an Addressed User during a modification procedure. The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- The Initiating User sends a **MODIFY REQUEST** to the Network. +- The Network forwards the **MODIFY REQUEST** to the Addressed User. +- The Addressed User responds with a **MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE** to the Network. +- The Network forwards the **MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE** to the Initiating User. + +Parameter changes are indicated by specific symbols and arrow types: + +- Forward UPC change:** Indicated by a square with a diagonal line from top-left to bottom-right. +- Backward UPC change:** Indicated by a square with a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right. +- Change of applied forward ATM traffic parameters:** Indicated by a circle with a diagonal line from top-left to bottom-right. +- Change of applied backward ATM traffic parameters:** Indicated by a circle with a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right. +- Parameter value changes:** + - Increase:** Dashed upward arrow (ATM traffic descriptor IE value) or solid upward arrow (up to finally accepted value). + - Decrease:** Dashed downward arrow (ATM traffic descriptor IE value) or solid downward arrow (down to finally accepted value). +- CAC change:** Indicated by a box containing 'R/A'. +- Network internal actions:** + - Reservation of resources (R):** Shown in a box within the Network entity. + - Allocation of resources (A):** Shown in a box within the Network entity. + +T1199130-98 + +Sequence diagram showing the procedure of modification without request of connection acknowledgement between an Initiating User, a Network, and an Addressed User. The diagram includes message exchanges (MODIFY REQUEST, MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE) and various parameter change indicators (UPC, ATM traffic parameters, CAC). + +**Figure I.1/Q.2963.3 – Procedure of modification without request of connection acknowledgement** + +![Sequence diagram showing the procedure of modification with request of connection acknowledgement between an Initiating User, Network, and Addressed User. The diagram includes message exchanges for MODIFY REQUEST, MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE, and CONNECTION AVAILABLE, with various icons indicating parameter changes and resource actions. Forward UPC change icon Backward UPC change icon Change of applied forward ATM traffic parameters icon Change of applied backward ATM traffic parameters icon Upward dashed arrow icon Downward dashed arrow icon Upward solid arrow icon Downward solid arrow icon](8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between an Initiating User, a Network, and an Addressed User for modifying a connection. The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- MODIFY REQUEST:** The Initiating User sends a request to the Network. The Network then forwards this request to the Addressed User. The request includes icons for forward and backward ATM traffic parameter changes, and a box containing 'R' (Reservation of resources). +- MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE:** The Addressed User responds with an acknowledgement. The Network receives this and forwards it back to the Initiating User. This message includes icons for forward and backward ATM traffic parameter changes, and a box containing 'A' (Allocation of resources). +- CONNECTION AVAILABLE:** Finally, the Network sends a 'CONNECTION AVAILABLE' message to the Addressed User, indicated by a forward ATM traffic parameter change icon. + +**Legend:** + +- Forward UPC change +- Backward UPC change +- Change of applied forward ATM traffic parameters +- Change of applied backward ATM traffic parameters +- Increase of any parameter based on the value specified in the ATM traffic descriptor IE and the value (if any) specified in the Alternative ATM traffic descriptor IE +- Decrease of any parameter based on the value specified in the ATM traffic descriptor IE and the value (if any) specified in the Alternative or Minimum Acceptable ATM traffic descriptor IE +- Increase of any parameter up to the finally accepted value +- Decrease of any parameter down to the finally accepted value +- R/A** CAC change +**R** Reservation of resources +**A** Allocation of resources + +T1199140-98 + +Sequence diagram showing the procedure of modification with request of connection acknowledgement between an Initiating User, Network, and Addressed User. The diagram includes message exchanges for MODIFY REQUEST, MODIFY ACKNOWLEDGE, and CONNECTION AVAILABLE, with various icons indicating parameter changes and resource actions. Forward UPC change icon Backward UPC change icon Change of applied forward ATM traffic parameters icon Change of applied backward ATM traffic parameters icon Upward dashed arrow icon Downward dashed arrow icon Upward solid arrow icon Downward solid arrow icon + +**Figure I.2/Q.2963.3 – Procedure of modification with request of connection acknowledgement** + +# APPENDIX II + +## **Guidelines for the use of the instruction indicator** + +It is suggested that the instruction indicator for the alternative ATM traffic indicator and minimum acceptable ATM traffic descriptor information elements be encoded to indicate "discard, proceed and report status". + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure | +| Series Z | Programming languages | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2965.1B-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2965.1B-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..104a57fbd03964ffd2520508b2be42e03343d20f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.2965.1B-200012-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2468dfa77e8d32611a5fe8a2ebb904676994eeb54463226fd865698560c960c +size 8232 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..072f073b6d42cbfa77c827c76c611f286177034a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ee72ddf991b7b1d543b2694b1687804845ecb97da77cc35e98e4c7dbf5ac163d +size 4142 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8576aeabda55dbdbd0ba4d40f4fa1562386e4c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5cfedd6bc3b5bd75e08775754534d75a0d788cdcbfe4eb9201529ac7f4120eab +size 46240 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6336f87a230eccce3d38150607318810f91832ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d98021321e0001aecad9da5fc2a4c85193c75294aae67a36339cab2f1d425e70 +size 17734 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecad9a35e41a605ded1f860e35c056dad5edcef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d7e017a2be6213e9224b3a272e3638618874b3e0241c323a715a23025e9e9e4c +size 33517 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cac81bb41f5f7af7fa9ed42b380b6c667ed664af --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0bcb02a960cf135ba24cb1dd428180cc578035b4145e9ddb60c93e21c2386d7c +size 76297 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c8a51f3bb8ed12b2046978d50e1c48c63cf63f1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3059-202009-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,468 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3059** + +(09/2020) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Network signalling and control functional architecture + +# --- **Signalling requirements for service function discovery** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3059 + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| VoLTE/ViLTE network signalling | Q.3640–Q.3655 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR P2P COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100–Q.4139 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050–Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3059 + +# Signalling requirements for service function discovery + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3059 specifies the signalling requirements for service function discovery based on its functional architecture. The signalling is for the service function path controller to discover and select the service function. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3059 | 2020-09-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/14412 | + +## Keywords + +Service function, service function discovery, signalling requirements. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2020 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Overview ..... | 2 | +| 7 Functional architecture of the service function discovery ..... | 3 | +| 8 The information flow of SFD ..... | 4 | +| 9 Signalling requirements of the SFDi ..... | 5 | +| 9.1 Signalling requirements of SFDi.a ..... | 5 | +| 9.2 Signalling requirements of SFDi.b ..... | 6 | +| 9.3 Signalling requirements of SFDi.c ..... | 7 | +| Bibliography..... | 9 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3059 + +# Signalling requirements for service function discovery + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation covers: + +- Overview of service function discovery (SFD); +- Functional architecture of SFD; +- Information flow of SFD; +- Signalling requirements of SFDi (SFD interface); + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[IETF RFC 7665] IETF RFC 7665 (2015), *Service function chaining (SFC) architecture*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 service function chain (SFC)** [b-ITU-T Y-Sup.41]: A chain that defines an ordered set of abstract service functions and ordering constraints that must be applied to packets and/or frames and/or flows selected as a result of classification and/or policy. + +**3.1.2 service function forwarder (SFF)** [IETF RFC 7665]: A service function forwarder is responsible for forwarding traffic to one or more connected service functions according to information carried in the service function chain (SFC) encapsulation, as well as handling traffic coming back from the service function (SF). Additionally, an SFF is responsible for delivering traffic to a classifier when needed and supported, transporting traffic to another SFF (in the same or different type of overlay), and terminating the service function path (SFP). + +**3.1.3 service function path (SFP)** [IETF RFC 7665]: A constrained specification of where packets assigned to a certain service function path must go. While it may be so constrained as to identify the exact locations, it can also be less specific. The SFP provides a level of indirection between the fully abstract notion of service chain as a sequence of abstract service functions to be delivered, and the fully specified notion of exactly which service function forwarder (SFF)/service functions (SFs) the packet will visit when it actually traverses the network. By allowing the control components to specify this level of indirection, the operator may control the degree of SFF/SF selection authority that is delegated to the network. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following term: + +**3.2.1 network service header (NSH):** A type of encapsulation for service function controllers that is designed to encapsulate an original packet or frame and, in turn, be encapsulated by an outer transport encapsulation (which is used to deliver the NSH to NSH-aware network elements). + +NOTE – Definition based on [b-IETF RFC 8300]. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-----|-----------------------------| +| CGN | Carrier-Grade NAT | +| DPI | Deep Packet Inspection | +| NAT | Network Address Translation | +| NSH | Network Service Header | +| RSP | Rendered Service Path | +| SF | Service Function | +| SFC | Service Function Chain | +| SFD | Service Function Discovery | +| SFF | Service Function Forwarder | +| SFP | Service Function Path | + +# 5 Conventions + +In the body of this Recommendation, the words shall, shall not, should and may sometimes appear, in which case they are to be interpreted, respectively as, is required to, is prohibited from, is recommended and can optionally. The appearance of such phrases or keywords in an appendix or in material explicitly marked as informative are to be interpreted as having no normative intent. + +{A}: indicates that the parameter A is mandatory. + +# 6 Overview + +Service function chain (SFC) enables the creation of composite services that consist of an ordered set of service functions. The main activities of SFC are the collection and management of network resources over geographically distributed networks. + +![Figure 6-1: The SFC path calculation problem. The diagram illustrates two network layers. The top layer (Service Function Chain) includes a Classifier, DPI, CGN, and Service Function Instances (SFF1-SFF7). A packet enters from the bottom layer, passing through the Classifier and DPI (on SFF1). From SFF1, it can go to SFF5 (CGN) or SFF3 (CGN). The 'Expected RSP' (Expected Rendered Service Path) is Classifier-SFF1-SFF3-SFF4, which corresponds to the original IP path PE1-P1-P2-P3-PE2. The actual 'RSP' (Rendered Service Path) is Classifier-SFF1-SFF5-SFF6-SFF7-SFF4, which corresponds to a longer IP path PE1-P1-P5-P6-P7-PE2. The bottom layer (IP network) includes PE1, P1, P2, P3, PE2, P5, P6, and P7. The 'IP data path computed by OSPF' is PE1-P1-P2-P3-PE2. A legend at the bottom defines PE as Provider edge router and P as Provider router. A label 'Q.3059(20)_F6-1' is in the bottom right.](ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg) + +Figure 6-1: The SFC path calculation problem. The diagram illustrates two network layers. The top layer (Service Function Chain) includes a Classifier, DPI, CGN, and Service Function Instances (SFF1-SFF7). A packet enters from the bottom layer, passing through the Classifier and DPI (on SFF1). From SFF1, it can go to SFF5 (CGN) or SFF3 (CGN). The 'Expected RSP' (Expected Rendered Service Path) is Classifier-SFF1-SFF3-SFF4, which corresponds to the original IP path PE1-P1-P2-P3-PE2. The actual 'RSP' (Rendered Service Path) is Classifier-SFF1-SFF5-SFF6-SFF7-SFF4, which corresponds to a longer IP path PE1-P1-P5-P6-P7-PE2. The bottom layer (IP network) includes PE1, P1, P2, P3, PE2, P5, P6, and P7. The 'IP data path computed by OSPF' is PE1-P1-P2-P3-PE2. A legend at the bottom defines PE as Provider edge router and P as Provider router. A label 'Q.3059(20)\_F6-1' is in the bottom right. + +**Figure 6-1 – The SFC path calculation problem** + +The discovery of service functions is a primary step for implementing SFC. The service function path (SFP) used in a real network (also called rendered service path (RSP)) is computed by SFFs or a path controller by choosing the closest service function instances. However, the path calculated in this way may introduce unnecessary latency to the packet transmission, as shown in Figure 6-1: + +- (1) The original IP data path calculated by IP route protocol is PE1-P1-P2-P3-PE2; +- (2) Assume that there are two service functions which the packets should be passed through. One is deep packet inspection (DPI) residing on SFF1, the others are carrier-grade NATs (CGNs) residing on the SFF3 and SFF5. After DPI processes the packets, the SFF1 needs to find the next SFF to forward the packet. Since the SFF5 is much closer to SFF1 than SFF3, SFF1 chooses SFF5 to forward the packet. So, the final RSP is classifier-SFF1-SFF5-SFF6-SFF7-SFF4 whose corresponding IP data path is PE1-P1-P5-P6-P7-PE2. +- (3) The RSP calculated in this way is much longer than the original IP data path and introduces extra latency. If SFF1 chooses SFF3 as the CGN forwarder, the RSP is classifier-SFF1-SFF2-SFF3-SFF4 and it is the same as the original IP data path. + +Since the NSH layer is separated from the IP layer, the SFF cannot choose service function instances closest to the original IP data path and generates extra latency. Therefore, it is crucial for the SFC controller to discover service function instances and calculate the SFP based on the IP data path information. + +# 7 Functional architecture of the service function discovery + +[b-ITU-T Y.Suppl.41] provides the control plane and data plane of SFC which are shown in Figure 7-1. + +![Figure 7-1: Control plane and data plane of service function chaining. The diagram shows three main components: Control plane, Management plane, and Data plane. The Control plane contains Policy controller, SF chain controller, SF path controller, and User profile. The Management plane contains SF chain manager, SF path manager, and SF manager. The Data plane contains Classifier, Service function 1, Service function 2, and Service function 3. Arrows indicate connections: Control plane to Data plane, Management plane to Control plane, and Management plane to Data plane. A label Q.3059(20)_F7-1 is at the bottom right.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-1: Control plane and data plane of service function chaining. The diagram shows three main components: Control plane, Management plane, and Data plane. The Control plane contains Policy controller, SF chain controller, SF path controller, and User profile. The Management plane contains SF chain manager, SF path manager, and SF manager. The Data plane contains Classifier, Service function 1, Service function 2, and Service function 3. Arrows indicate connections: Control plane to Data plane, Management plane to Control plane, and Management plane to Data plane. A label Q.3059(20)\_F7-1 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-1 – Control plane and data plane of service function chaining** + +![Figure 7-2: Functional architecture of service function discovery. The diagram shows three entities: Centralized SF path controller, Service function, and SFF (Distributed SF path controller). Arrows represent interfaces: SFDi.a between Centralized SF path controller and Service function, SFDi.b between Service function and SFF, and SFDi.c between Centralized SF path controller and SFF. A label Q.3059(20)_F7-2 is at the bottom right.](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-2: Functional architecture of service function discovery. The diagram shows three entities: Centralized SF path controller, Service function, and SFF (Distributed SF path controller). Arrows represent interfaces: SFDi.a between Centralized SF path controller and Service function, SFDi.b between Service function and SFF, and SFDi.c between Centralized SF path controller and SFF. A label Q.3059(20)\_F7-2 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-2 – Functional architecture of service function discovery** + +Figure 7-2 presents the functional architecture of service function discovery. The centralized service function (SF) path controller functional component is responsible for service function path calculation. According to the problem stated in clause 6, to calculate the shortest SFP, the centralized SF path controller needs to collect the information of all the service function instances and SFFs' locations. + +SFF (also known as distributed SF path controller) functional component is responsible for finding out the distance between the service function instances and itself, and figuring out the service function forwarding table based on the distance information. + +The interface SFDi is responsible for service function discovery and is among three entities as shown in Figure 7-2. + +- (1) The SFDi.a is responsible for individual service function instance registration. This interface is between the centralized SF path controller functional component and the service function functional component. +- (2) The SFDi.b is responsible for distance information collection. This interface is between the distributed SF path controller functional component and the service function functional component. +- (3) The SFDi.c is responsible for transmitting the service function instance information between the centralized SF path controller functional component and SFF. The service function information includes: + - a) IP addresses and ports of service function instance; + - b) Distance between the specific SFF and the specific service function instance. + +# 8 The information flow of SFD + +Figure 8-1 presents the information flow of the service function discovery through interface SFDi. + +![Sequence diagram illustrating the service function discovery procedure through interface SFDi. The diagram shows three lifelines: Centralized SF path controller, Service function, and SFF (Distributed SF path controller). The sequence of messages is: Step 1: SF registration (Service function to Centralized SF path controller); Step 2: SF's information (Centralized SF path controller to SFF); Step 3: Distance measurement request (SFF to Service function); Step 4: Distance measurement echo (Service function to SFF); Step 5: SFF and SF distance information (SFF to Centralized SF path controller). The diagram is labeled Q.3059(20)_F8-1.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant SF as Service function + participant CSP as Centralized SF path controller + participant SFF as SFF (Distributed SF path controller) + Note left of CSP: Step 1 + SF->>CSP: SF registration + Note left of CSP: Step 2 + CSP->>SFF: SF's information + Note left of SFF: Step 3 + SFF->>SF: Distance measurement request + Note left of SF: Step 4 + SF->>SFF: Distance measurement echo + Note left of SFF: Step 5 + SFF->>CSP: SFF and SF distance information + +``` + +Q.3059(20)\_F8-1 + +Sequence diagram illustrating the service function discovery procedure through interface SFDi. The diagram shows three lifelines: Centralized SF path controller, Service function, and SFF (Distributed SF path controller). The sequence of messages is: Step 1: SF registration (Service function to Centralized SF path controller); Step 2: SF's information (Centralized SF path controller to SFF); Step 3: Distance measurement request (SFF to Service function); Step 4: Distance measurement echo (Service function to SFF); Step 5: SFF and SF distance information (SFF to Centralized SF path controller). The diagram is labeled Q.3059(20)\_F8-1. + +**Figure 8-1 – The service function discovery procedure through interface SFDi** + +Step 1: The service function instance uses SFDi.a to register itself to the centralized SF path controller. + +Step 2: The centralized SF path controller uses SFDi.c to send the IP information of the collected service function instance to all the SFFs. + +Step 3: SFFs use SFDi.b to send request message to the service function instance to measure the distance between them. + +Step 4: The service function instance replies to the SFF's request through SFDi.b. When SFF receives the echo message, it calculates the distance between them, including the number of IP hops and latency. + +Step 5: The SFF sends the service function instance's distance information to the centralized SF path controller through SFDi.c. + +NOTE – How the centralized SF path controller collects the SFF information is out of the scope of this Recommendation. + +# 9 Signalling requirements of the SFDi + +## 9.1 Signalling requirements of SFDi.a + +The SF registration request message is defined as SF-REG-RQ message. + +The SF-REG-RQ message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the service function instance to the centralized SF path controller in order to register itself. + +Message format: + +``` + + ::= < Message Header > + {SF-IP-Address-Port} + {SF-Type} + +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed SF information indicates, but not limited to: + +1. SF-IP-Address-Port uniquely specifies the IP address and port information of the service function instance. +2. SF-Type uniquely specifies the type for service function instance, for example DPI. + +The SF registration response message is defined as SF-REG-RP message. + +The SF-REG-RP message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the centralized SF path controller to the service function instance in order to respond its request. + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > + + {SF-Instance-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed SF information indicates but not limited to: + +1. `SF-Instance-ID` uniquely specifies the global service function instance ID. + +## 9.2 Signalling requirements of SFDi.b + +The service function instance distance information request message is defined as SFDIS-REG-RQ message. + +- (1) The SFDIS-REG-RQ message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, it is sent from the SFF to the service function instance to calculate the distance between SFF and service function instance. + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > + + {SF-IP-Address-Port} + + {SF-Instance-ID} + + {SFF-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates, but not limited to: + +1. `SF-IP-Address-Port` uniquely specifies the IP address and port of service function instance. +2. `SF-Instance-ID` uniquely specifies the service function instance ID. +3. `SFF-ID` uniquely specifies the SFF ID. + +The SF distance information response message is defined as SFDIS-REG-RP message. + +The SFDIS-REG-RP message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the service function instance to SFF to respond to its request. + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > + + {SF-Instance-ID} + + {SF-IP-Address-Port} + + {Latency} + + {IP-Hops} + + {SFF-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +SF distance information, the detailed information indicates but not limited to: + +1. `SF-Instance-ID` uniquely specifies the service function instance ID. + +2. `SF-IP-Address-Port` uniquely specifies the service function instance's IP address and port. +3. `Latency` uniquely specifies the latency between the specific SFF and the specific service function instance. +4. `IP-Hops` uniquely specifies the IP hops between the specific SFF and the specific service function instance. +5. `SFF-ID` uniquely specifies the SFF ID. + +## 9.3 Signalling requirements of SFDi.c + +The distance information request message is defined as DIS-REG-RQ message. + +The DIS-REG-RQ message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the centralized SF path controller to all the SFFs to request the distance information between the specific service function instance and each SFF, respectively. + +NOTE – The information carried in this message is as same as the SFDIS-REG-RQ message. + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > + {SF-IP-Address-Port} + {SF-Instance-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but not limited to: + +1. `SF-IP-Address-Port` uniquely specifies the IP address and port information of service function instance. +2. `SF-Instance-ID` uniquely specifies the service function instance ID. + +The service function instance's distance information response message is defined as DIS-REG-RP message. + +The DIS-REG-RP message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the SFF to the centralized SF path controller. + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > + {SF-Instance-ID} + {SF-IP-Address-Port} + {Latency} + {IP-Hops} + {SFF-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +SF distance information, the detailed information indicates, but not limited to: + +1. `SF-Instance-ID` uniquely specifies the service function instance ID. +2. `SF-IP-Address-port` uniquely specifies the service function instance's IP address and port. + +3. Latency uniquely specifies the latency between the specific SFF and the specific service function instance. +4. IP-Hops uniquely specifies the number of IP hops between the specific SFF and the specific service function instance. +5. SFF-ID uniquely specifies the SFF ID. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T Y-Sup.41] Supplement 41 to ITU-T Y-series Recommendations (2016), *Deployment models of service function chaining*. +- [b-IETF RFC 8300] IETF RFC 8300 (2018), *Network service header (NSH)*. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5a35041124e73f88d6638cd17f42a2eb4f6781a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8f24b214263bab4142643453a604fb5196f9397e2500c675cde79d53ce5e5d8e +size 3645 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9699cf5ed19178600e703e0a6eb3c5c9902ff31f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5ff6e86467d74d5c962a9c939ea784a1a310a5c86b3ddf2d19c0399bf0fc2cd8 +size 142682 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8fcc9cda567008edd1dbda4f3bb1a0ab109a3290 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:234307702eeca95a69c254547174a0f487a0ba577100262fea60616b17e2982e +size 184053 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/85e2327652d513a7fee8fdbf97ad06f1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/85e2327652d513a7fee8fdbf97ad06f1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d046c4438bb3abe86510b3a975c6081e50c75fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/85e2327652d513a7fee8fdbf97ad06f1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b075218a1c97612609f74ad783e03c2b95bea64ade8b22bbcf382ba52fc03046 +size 153764 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/b3c108e7145f2017957569d06ea359cb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/b3c108e7145f2017957569d06ea359cb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a42fa67a0f05b19e72fa80e83858342edce62fc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/b3c108e7145f2017957569d06ea359cb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:145c57be2c47c8bddabcff7efc088eb852f4c4200a0753938a5d045743a1d9d5 +size 33301 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c10a324c81d7bab7b5ab96b19aee41529f9f882 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae21e827f3466c7618da6f383c1d69474862205e78fb7324c09e0ef309dcfcf1 +size 169260 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a62fd36a3e5fda9e5f2cc7a126b95b6da98a882f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8b68abd5a9149bae5d1a6c98452822214f10cd990b28d42b62168d65e888482d +size 54636 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff6360e8ba2478e8043f36dffb10bdb975cb803a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c9ad0d485e35164a62577d4a24f4269e5598ccd51068134f7868f18bb4ec0890 +size 86912 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e90ca60a34359d5c86531b9f5a157545e3a2def1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3221-200810-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1381 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.3221** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(10/2008) + +# **SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Signalling and control requirements and protocols to +support attachment in NGN environments + +## --- **Requirements and protocol at the interface between the service control entity and the transport location management physical entity (S-TC1 interface)** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3221 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +# SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3999 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3649 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3849 | +| Testing for NGN networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## **Recommendation ITU-T Q.3221** + +## **Requirements and protocol at the interface between the service control entity and the transport location management physical entity (S-TC1 interface)** + +# **Summary** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3221 provides the signalling requirements and protocol for the interface between the service control entities (SCEs) in the services stratum and the transport location management physical entity (TLM-PE) in the network attachment control function block of the next generation network (NGN) release 1. This protocol can be used to retrieve the location information attached by the user equipment. It satisfies the requirements for information flows across the S-TC1 reference point as specified in Recommendation ITU-T Y.2014. + +## **Source** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3221 was approved on 14 October 2008 by ITU-T Study Group 11 (2005-2008) under Recommendation ITU-T A.8 procedure. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2009 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 1.1 | Relationship ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 3 | +| 5 | S-TC1 interface..... | 3 | +| 5.1 | Overview ..... | 3 | +| 5.2 | S-TC1 reference model..... | 4 | +| 5.3 | Physical entities and capabilities ..... | 4 | +| 6 | Signalling requirements ..... | 5 | +| 6.1 | Information query ..... | 5 | +| 6.2 | Event registration..... | 6 | +| 6.3 | Notification event ..... | 7 | +| 7 | Description of procedures..... | 8 | +| 7.1 | General ..... | 8 | +| 7.2 | Procedure on the TLM-PE – SCE interface ..... | 8 | +| 8 | Use of the Diameter base protocol..... | 16 | +| 8.1 | Securing Diameter messages ..... | 16 | +| 8.2 | Accounting functionality ..... | 17 | +| 8.3 | Use of sessions ..... | 17 | +| 8.4 | Transport protocol ..... | 17 | +| 8.5 | Routing considerations ..... | 17 | +| 8.6 | Advertising application support ..... | 17 | +| 9 | Message specification..... | 18 | +| 9.1 | Commands ..... | 18 | +| 9.2 | Experimental-Result-Code AVP values ..... | 21 | +| 9.3 | AVPs..... | 21 | +| 9.4 | Use of namespaces ..... | 25 | +| 10 | Security considerations ..... | 26 | +| Annex A – | Scenarios using S-TC1 ..... | 27 | +| A.1 | CASE 1: NACE-SCE bundled authentication based on line information..... | 27 | +| A.2 | CASE 2: NACE-SCE bundled authentication based on the authentication context ..... | 29 | +| A.3 | CASE 3: Information of PD-PE in RACE for providing QoS ..... | 30 | +| A.4 | CASE 4: Location service based on fixed access line information with bundled authentication..... | 32 | +| Bibliography | ..... | 34 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3221 + +## Requirements and protocol at the interface between the service control entity and the transport location management physical entity (S-TC1 interface) + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation defines the requirements and protocol for the interface between the transport location management physical entity (TLM-PE) and the service control entity of ITU-T NGN release 1. + +At the stage of NGN release 1 [ITU-T Y.2012], this Recommendation is applicable to the interface between TLM-PE and SCE. + +## 1.1 Relationship + +Work for this Recommendation is based on the context of [ITU-T Y.2014] and [ITU-T Y.2012]; this Recommendation satisfies the requirements for information flows across the S-TC1 reference point as specified in [ITU-T Y.2014] and the functional requirements and architecture specified in [ITU-T Y.2012]. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T Y.2012] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2012 (2006), *Functional requirements and architecture of the NGN release 1*. +- [ITU-T Y.2014] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2014 (2008), *Network attachment control functions in next generation networks*. +- [ITU-T Y.2701] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2701 (2007), *Security requirements for NGN release 1*. +- [ETSI TS 129 209] ETSI TS 129 209 V6.7.0 (2007), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Policy control over Gq interface*. +- [ETSI TS 129 229] ETSI TS 129 229 V7.8.0 (2008), *Cx and Dx interfaces based on the Diameter protocol; Protocol details*. +- [ETSI TS 129 329] ETSI TS 129 329 V6.7.0 (2006), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Sh interface based on the Diameter protocol; Protocol details*. +- [ETSI TS 187 003] ETSI TS 187 003 V1.7.1 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); NGN Security; Security Architecture*. +- [ETSI TS 283 034] ETSI ES 283 034 V2.2.0 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Network Attachment Sub-System (NASS); e4 interface based on the Diameter protocol*. + +- [ETSI ES 283 035] ETSI ES 283 035 V2.5.1 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Network Attachment Sub-System (NASS); e2 interface based on the Diameter protocol.* +- [IETF RFC 2960] IETF RFC 2960 (2000), *Stream Control Transmission Protocol.* +- [IETF RFC 3309] IETF RFC 3309 (2002), *Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Checksum Change.* +- [IETF RFC 3554] IETF RFC 3554 (2003), *On the Use of Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) with IPsec.* +- [IETF RFC 3588] IETF RFC 3588 (2003), *Diameter Base Protocol.* + +# 3 Definitions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.1 attribute-value pair (AVP):** An attribute-value pair corresponds to an information element in a Diameter message. Source of definition is [IETF RFC 3588]. + +**3.2 mobility:** The ability for the user or other mobile entities to communicate and access services irrespective of changes of the location or technical environment. Source of definition is [b-ITU-T Y.2001]. + +NOTE 1 – The degree of service availability may depend on several factors including the access network capabilities, service level agreements between the user's home network and the visited network (if applicable), etc. Mobility includes the ability of telecommunication with or without service continuity [b-ITU-T Y.2001]. + +NOTE 2 – In [b-ITU-T Y.2001] this is called generalized mobility. + +**3.3 nomadism:** The ability of the user to change their network access point. When changing the network access point, the user's service session is completely stopped and then started again, i.e., there is no service continuity or hand-over used. Source of definition is [b-ITU-T Q.1706]. + +NOTE – It is assumed that normal usage pattern is that users shut down their service session before attaching to a different access point. + +**3.4 roaming:** This is the ability of users to access services according to their user profile while outside of their subscribed home network, i.e., by using an access point of a visited network. This requires the capability for access to the visited network, the existence of an interface between home network and visited network, as well as a roaming agreement between the respective network operators. Source of definition is [b-ITU-T Q.1706]. + +**3.5 service control entity (SCE):** Element of the service layer architecture offering applications that require information about the characteristics of the IP-connectivity session used to access such applications. + +**3.6 single sign-on:** The ability to use an authentication assertion from one network operator/service provider to another operator/provider for a user either accessing a service or roaming into a visited network. Source of definition is [b-ITU-T Y.2201]. + +**3.7 subscriber:** The person or organization responsible for concluding contracts for the services subscribed to and for paying for these services. Source of definition is [b-ITU-T M.3050.1]. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|----------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| ABNF | Augmented Backus-Naur Form | +| AM-PE | Access Management Physical Entity | +| AVP | Attribute-Value Pair | +| CPE | Customer Premises Equipment | +| IMPI | IMS Private User Identity | +| IMPU | IMS Public User Identity | +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| NACE | Network Attachment Control Entity | +| NACF | Network Attachment Control Functions | +| NAC-PE | Network Access Configuration Physical Entity | +| P-CSC-PE | Proxy – Call Session Control Physical Entity | +| PD-PE | Policy Decision Physical Entity | +| RACE | Resource and Admission Control Entity | +| RACF | Resource and Admission Control Functions | +| SCE | Service Control Entity | +| SCF | Service Control Functions | +| SCTP | Stream Control Transport Protocol | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | +| TAA-PE | Transport Authentication and Authorization Physical Entity | +| TLM-PE | Transport Location Management Physical Entity | + +# 5 S-TC1 interface + +## 5.1 Overview + +The network attachment control entity (NACE) maintains information on IP-connectivity access sessions associated with user equipment connected to the NGN network. This information is stored in the transport location management physical entity (TLM-PE) and made accessible to other control functions and applications through two interfaces (see Figure 5-1): + +- The S-TC1 interface enables the service control entity (SCE) to retrieve session data related to IP-connectivity. +- The Ru interface enables session data related to IP-connectivity to be exchanged between the NACE and the resource and admission control entity (RACE) as defined in [ITU-T Y.2012]. + +This Recommendation specifies the protocol for the S-TC1 interface. + +In this Recommendation, a service control entity (SCE) is defined as a generic term representing any element of the service layer architecture. It offers applications requiring information on the characteristics of the IP-connectivity session being used to access the applications. One example of a service control entity is the P-CSC-PE in the service control functions. + +## 5.2 S-TC1 reference model + +The S-TC1 interface, as shown in Figure 5-1, is defined between the SCE and the TLM-PE. + +![Figure 5-1 – S-TC1 reference model diagram. The diagram shows a Service Control Entity (SCE) at the top connected via the S-TC1 interface to a Transport Location Management Physical Entity (TLM-PE). The SCE is enclosed in a dashed box labeled 'Scope of this Recommendation'. The TLM-PE is connected to several other physical entities: HGWC-PE (via Nx), TAA-PE (via Nc), NAC-PE (via Ne), and PD-PE (via Ru). The TAA-PE is connected to TUP-PE (via Nb), AM-PE (via Na), and NAC-PE (via Nk). The NAC-PE is connected to AM-PE (via Nd). The TAA-PE has a self-loop labeled Ni. The NAC-PE has a self-loop labeled Ng. The TLM-PE is connected to the PD-PE via a Ru interface. The TLM-PE is part of the NACE domain, while the PD-PE is part of the RACE domain. The diagram is labeled Q.3221(08)_F5.1.](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +Figure 5-1 – S-TC1 reference model diagram. The diagram shows a Service Control Entity (SCE) at the top connected via the S-TC1 interface to a Transport Location Management Physical Entity (TLM-PE). The SCE is enclosed in a dashed box labeled 'Scope of this Recommendation'. The TLM-PE is connected to several other physical entities: HGWC-PE (via Nx), TAA-PE (via Nc), NAC-PE (via Ne), and PD-PE (via Ru). The TAA-PE is connected to TUP-PE (via Nb), AM-PE (via Na), and NAC-PE (via Nk). The NAC-PE is connected to AM-PE (via Nd). The TAA-PE has a self-loop labeled Ni. The NAC-PE has a self-loop labeled Ng. The TLM-PE is connected to the PD-PE via a Ru interface. The TLM-PE is part of the NACE domain, while the PD-PE is part of the RACE domain. The diagram is labeled Q.3221(08)\_F5.1. + +Figure 5-1 – S-TC1 reference model + +## 5.3 Physical entities and capabilities + +### 5.3.1 Transport location management physical entity (TLM-PE) + +The TLM-PE responds to location queries from service control functions and applications. The actual information delivered by the TLM-PE may take various forms (e.g., network location, geographical coordinates, postal address, etc.) depending on the agreements with the requester and on user preferences regarding the privacy of its location. + +The TLM-PE is able to correlate the information received from the NAC-PE and the TAA-PE based on the logical connection identifier. + +The TLM-PE may also store the identity of the user/CPE to which the IP address has been allocated (information received from the TAA-PE) as well as the user network QoS profile and user preferences regarding the privacy of the location information. In case it does not store the identity/profile of the user/CPE, the TLM-PE shall be able to retrieve this information from the TAA-PE. + +The TLM-PE registers the association between the IP address allocated to the CPE and related network location information provided by the NAC-PE (e.g., access line identifier). The TLM-PE interfaces with the NAC-PE to derive the association between the IP address allocated by the NAC-PE to the end user equipment and the identity of the logical access used by the attached user equipment (i.e., logical connection identifier). + +The TLM-PE may provide the SCE with user network profile information through the TLM-PE of the visited network to support mobility when the user is nomadic. + +Similarly, the TLM-PE is able to provide the SCE with user network profile information through the TLM-PE of another service provider for roaming on such access network. + +The functionality of the TLM-PE is further detailed in clause 7.2.3 of [ITU-T Y.2014]. + +### 5.3.2 Service control entity (SCE) + +In this Recommendation, the SCE is used as a generic term representing any element of the service layer architecture. SCE offers applications requiring information on the characteristics of the IP-connectivity session being used to access the applications. The SCE shall use the S-TC1 interface to get connection-related information with TLM-PE. One example of a SCE is the P-CSC-PE. The SCE requests for location information from TLM-PE, which in turn responds to location queries [ITU-T Y.2012]. The SCE needs network session information such as IP-connectivity status, access network type from TLM-PE and device information such as terminal type. + +Moreover, the SCE needs to know the RACE contact point to get resources for a service. Specifically, the P-CSC-PE needs to know the address of the PD-PE to send a QoS request for a service. The PD-PE will check between the QoS request sent from the SCE and QoS profile stored in TUP-PE and determine whether the requested QoS is applicable to the service. + +The SCE requests the user network QoS profile and user preferences regarding the privacy of location information. + +In addition, the SCE requests location information to provide nomadism for mobility. In cases wherein the access network technologies are identical and are owned by the same access network operator, service continuity or handover may be supported. + +Finally, the SCE requests location information for bundled authentication [ETSI TS 187 003]. + +# 6 Signalling requirements + +This reference point enables applications and service control functions to retrieve network location information from the TLM-PE. The primary parameter for retrieving the location information shall be the assigned IP address allocated to the terminal. + +The form of location information provided by the TLM-PE depends on the requestor. + +The following information flows are used on this interface: + +- Information query request/response +- Event registration request/response +- Notification event request/response + +![Sequence diagram showing information flow between SCE and TLM-PE. The diagram illustrates three pairs of messages: Information Query Request/Response, Event Registration Request/Response, and Notification Event Request/Response. The SCE sends the request and the TLM-PE responds. The diagram is labeled Q.3221(08)_F6.1.](b3c108e7145f2017957569d06ea359cb_img.jpg) + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant SCE + participant TLM-PE + Note left of SCE: Information flows + SCE->>TLM-PE: Information Query Request + TLM-PE-->>SCE: Information Query Response + SCE->>TLM-PE: Event Registration Request + TLM-PE-->>SCE: Event Registration Response + SCE->>TLM-PE: Notification Event Request + TLM-PE-->>SCE: Notification Event Response + Note right of TLM-PE: Q.3221(08)_F6.1 +``` + +Sequence diagram showing information flow between SCE and TLM-PE. The diagram illustrates three pairs of messages: Information Query Request/Response, Event Registration Request/Response, and Notification Event Request/Response. The SCE sends the request and the TLM-PE responds. The diagram is labeled Q.3221(08)\_F6.1. + +Figure 6-1 – Information flow + +## 6.1 Information query + +The information query request information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-1). + +**Table 6-1 – Information query request (SCE → TLM-PE)** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Globally unique IP address information | A set of IP address information used for locating the access network in which the CPE is attached. | +| – Unique IP address | The IP address for identifying the attached CPE. | +| – Address realm | The addressing domain of the IP address (e.g., subnet prefix or VPN ID). | +| Transport subscriber identifier | A globally unique identifier of the attached CPE. This identifier can be used for locating the transport subscription information for the CPE. | +| Requested items | The item list to the requested information | +| SCE identity | The identifier of the requesting service control entity. | + +The information query response information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-2) + +**Table 6-2 – Information query response (TLM-PE → SCE)** + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Transport subscriber identifier (optional) | A globally unique identifier for the attached CPE. (Note 1). | +| Location information (optional) (Note 2) | Location information (or a pointer to such information) in a form that is suitable for the requesting service control entity. | +| RACE contact point (optional) | The FQDN or IP address of the RACE where resource request shall be sent (i.e., PD-PE address). | +| CPE type (optional) | The type of CPE. | +| Type of access transport (optional) | The type of access network to which CPE is attached. | +| IP connectivity status (optional) | Whether IP connectivity to/from the user equipment is currently available. | +| Physical connection identifier (optional) | A local identifier for physical connection of access transport network that the CPE is attached to (e.g., IP address of PE-FE device, and MAC address or link ID and physical port). | +| Logical connection identifier (optional) | A local identifier for logical connection of access transport network to which the CPE is connected (e.g., ATM VPI/VCI, PPP, MPLS label, GTP tunnel and logical port). It can be used to locate the layer 2 connection and pertinent network devices for a particular CPE requesting the access transport resource. | +| NOTE 1 – This identifier may be used by the SCE when interacting with the RACE. | | +| NOTE 2 – Location information disclosure depends on the requesting application and the subscriber's privacy restrictions. Privacy restrictions are defined in the privacy indicator stored in the TLM-PE. | | + +## 6.2 Event registration + +The event registration request information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-3) + +**Table 6-3 – Event registration request (SCE → TLM-PE)** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Subscription duration | Duration for which the subscription for a particular event will be active. | +| Transport subscriber identifier (optional) | A globally unique identifier of the attached CPE. | +| Event | Event-Type (e.g., user logon event) and format for event relay/notification description. | +| Globally unique IP address information (optional) | A set of IP address information used for locating the access network in which the CPE is attached. | +| – Unique IP address | The IP address for identifying the attached CPE. | +| – Address realm | The addressing domain of the IP address (e.g., subnet prefix or VPN ID). | +| SCE identity (optional) | The identity of the requesting service control entity. | + +The event registration response information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-4). + +**Table 6-4 – Event registration response (TLM-PE → SCE)** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Update action | Administrative action/information for an event: e.g., ACTIVATED (event registration successfully received and event notification for "Event" activated). | +| Transport subscriber identifier | A globally unique identifier for the attached CPE. | +| Event | Event-Type (e.g., user logon event) | +| Globally unique IP address information | A set of IP address information used for locating the access network in which the CPE is attached. | +| – Unique IP address | The IP address for identifying the attached CPE. | +| – Address realm | The addressing domain of the IP address (e.g., subnet prefix or VPN ID). | + +## 6.3 Notification event + +The notification event request information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-5). + +**Table 6-5 – Notification event request (TLM-PE → SCE)** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Globally unique IP address information | A set of IP address information used for locating the access network in which the CPE is attached. | +| – Unique IP address | The IP address for identifying the attached CPE. | +| – Address realm | The addressing domain of the IP address (e.g., subnet prefix or VPN ID). | +| Transport subscriber identifier | A globally unique identifier for the attached CPE. | +| Event | Event-Type (e.g., user logon event) | + +The notification event response information flow contains the following information (see Table 6-6). + +**Table 6-6 – Notification event response (SCE → TLM-PE)** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Globally unique IP address information | A set of IP address information used for locating the access network in which the CPE is attached. | +| – Unique IP address | The IP address for identifying the attached CPE. | +| – Address realm | The addressing domain of the IP address (e.g., subnet prefix or VPN ID). | +| Transport subscriber identifier | A globally unique identifier for the attached CPE. | +| Event | Event-Type | +| Result | Result code (e.g., success, permanent failure, etc.) | + +# 7 Description of procedures + +## 7.1 General + +The following clauses describe the realization of the functional procedures defined in the NACE specifications using Diameter commands described in clause 9. This involves describing a mapping between the information elements defined in the NACE specification and Diameter AVPs. + +In the tables that describe this mapping, each information element is marked as (M) mandatory, (C) conditional or (O) optional [ETSI ES 283 035]. + +## 7.2 Procedure on the TLM-PE – SCE interface + +### 7.2.1 Information query + +#### 7.2.1.1 Overview + +This procedure is used by a SCE to retrieve from the TLM-PE location information and other data related to an access session. This procedure is mapped to the commands User-Data-Request/Answer in the Diameter application specified in Sh interface [ETSI TS 129 329]. Tables 7-1 and 7-2 detail the involved information elements as defined in the NACE and their mapping to Diameter AVPs. + +**Table 7-1 – Information query request** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|---------------------------------|----------------------------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Unique IP address | Globally-unique-address | C | This information element contains:
– The IP address of the user equipment used by the subscriber for which profile information is being pushed.
– The addressing domain in which the IP address is significant. | +| Address realm | | | | +| Transport subscriber identifier | User-Name | C | The user that is attached to the network. | +| SCE identity | SCE-Application-Identifier | M | Identifies the SCE originating the request. | +| Requested items | Requested-Information | O | The list of items requested by the SCE. | + +**Table 7-2 – Information query response** + +| Information Element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Result | Result-Code/
Experimental-Result | M | Result of the request.
Result-Code AVP shall be used for errors defined in the Diameter Base Protocol.
Experimental-Result AVP shall be used for other errors. This is a grouped AVP which contains the 3GPP Vendor ID in the Vendor-Id AVP, and the error code in the Experimental-Result-Code AVP. | +| Transport subscriber identifier | User-Name | O | The user that is attached to the network. | +| Location information | Location-Information | O | Location information (or a pointer to such information) in a form that is suitable for the requesting application. | +| RACE contact point | RACE-Contact-Point | O | The FQDN or IP address of the RACE where resource request shall be sent (i.e., PD-PE address). | +| Access transport network type | Access-Network-Type | O | The type of access network over which IP connectivity is provided to the user equipment. | +| CPE type | CPE-Type | O | The type of user equipment to which the IP address was allocated. | +| IP connectivity status | IP-connectivity-status | O | The status of IP connectivity to/from the user equipment. | +| Physical connection identifier | Physical-Connection-Identifier | O | A local identifier for physical connection of access transport network to which the CPE is attached to (e.g., IP address of PE-FE device, and MAC address or link ID and physical port). | +| Logical connection identifier | Logical-Connection-Identifier | O | A local identifier for logical connection of access transport network to which the CPE is connected (e.g., ATM VPI/VCI, PPP, MPLS label, GTP tunnel and logical port). It can be used to locate the layer 2 connection and pertinent network devices for a particular attached CPE. | + +#### 7.2.1.2 Procedure at the SCE side + +The SCE shall request the information query request by including the following information elements: + +- 1) Either a Globally-Unique-Address AVP or a User-Name AVP will be present. The Globally-Unique-Address AVP shall contain a Frame-IP-Address or Frame-IPv6-Prefix AVP value and an Address-Realm AVP. The Address-Realm AVP shall be obtained from predefined configuration data in SCE. In case of configuration data, all terminal equipments served by a SCE have the same addressing domain. +- 2) The SCE-Application-Identifier AVP shall be present. +- 3) The Requested-Information AVP shall be present if specific information is requested and shall be absent if all available information is requested. + +The requested information AVP may be absent or present, depending on requests. In Annex A, there are some examples of scenarios which show the requested information AVP is used in S-TC1. + +Case 1) shows NACE-SCE bundled authentication scenario in fixed access network. In bundled authentication, the network authentication implies service authentication. After successful NACE authentication, access line information is stored to TUP-PE. This line information is compared with that of SUP-PE in service authentication. In bundled authentication environment, P-CSC-PE shall send information request to TLM-PE to request line information by using IP address as a key of Requested-Information AVP. TLM-PE will fetch line information corresponding to the IP address and send the line information as location information response. + +Case 2) shows NACE-SCE bundled authentication scenario in both fixed and mobile access network. SCE will request authentication data as a Requested-Information AVP. The Requested-Information AVP will be authentication data bound to IP address. Because access point information varies in mobile access network, bundled authentication shall be completed by checking authentication data between TUP-PE and SUP-PE. + +Case 3) shows the case in which SCE requests address of PD-PE for QoS service. SCE needs QoS policy to provide QoS-based service and TLM-PE keeps the contact point of policy server that is PD-PE. P-CSC-PE sends information query to TLM-PE to request the address of PD-PE in Requested-Information AVP. TLM-PE will send back to P-CSC-PE with the address of PD-PE as information response. + +Case 4) shows a scenario of location-based service. When a user is looking for a hospital, location-based service will recommend a closest hospital geographically. To recognize the user's location, the service will make use of the user's authentication data, IP address and line information. + +#### 7.2.1.3 Procedure at the TLM-PE side + +![Flowchart of the procedure at the TLM-PE side for a location query. The process starts with NULL, checks for Globally-Unique-Address AVP and User-Name AVP, then evaluates subscriber identity matching and overload conditions to determine the appropriate response code.](c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([NULL]) --> Step1[Check both Globally-Unique-Address AVP & User-Name AVP] + Step1 --> Decision1{Is Globally-Unique-Address AVP present?} + Decision1 -- No --> Decision2{Is User-Name AVP present?} + Decision2 -- No --> Response1[Return an Information Response with Result-Code = DIAMETER_MISSING_AV] + Decision2 -- Yes --> Decision3{Does Subscriber Identity matching User-Name AVP exist?} + Decision3 -- No --> Response2[Return an Information Response with Result-Code = DIAMETER_ERROR_USER_UNKNOWN] + Decision3 -- Yes --> Decision4{The Number of Subscriber Identity matching User-Name AVP > 1} + Decision4 -- No --> Response3[Return an Information Response with Result-Code = DIAMETER_UNABLE_TO_COMPLY] + Decision4 -- Yes --> Decision5{Under temporary overload conditions?} + Decision5 -- Yes --> Response4[Return an Information Response with Experimental-Result-Code = DIAMETER_USER_DATA_NOT_AVAILABLE] + Decision5 -- No --> Decision6{Database error or other error?} + Decision6 -- Yes --> Response5[Return an Information Response with Result-Code = DIAMETER_UNABLE_TO_COMPLY] + Decision6 -- No --> Step2[Check which session data can be returned to SCE from Requested-Information AVP, based on local policy rules and per-subscriber privacy information] + Step2 --> Response6[Return an Information Response with Result-Code = DIAMETER_SUCCESS] + +``` + +Q3221(08)\_F7.1 + +Flowchart of the procedure at the TLM-PE side for a location query. The process starts with NULL, checks for Globally-Unique-Address AVP and User-Name AVP, then evaluates subscriber identity matching and overload conditions to determine the appropriate response code. + +**Figure 7-1 – Procedure side for location query on the TLM-PE side** + +- 1) First, check both Globally-Unique-Address AVP and User-Name AVP. +- 2) If the Globally-Unique-Address AVP is present, go to step 6) to use this information as a key to retrieve the requested session information. Otherwise, go to the next step. +- 3) If the Globally-Unique-Address AVP is absent but the User-Name AVP is present, go to step 5) to use the latter information as a key to retrieve the requested session information. Otherwise, go to the next step. +- 4) Because both the Globally-Unique-Address AVP and the User-Name AVP are absent, return an information query response with Result-Code set to DIAMETER\_MISSING\_AV and stop this procedure. +- 5) If more than one record include the same subscriber identity matching the value of the User-Name AVP and no Globally-Unique-Address AVP is included, return an information query response with Result-Code set to DIAMETER\_UNABLE\_TO\_COMPLY and stop this procedure. Otherwise, go to the next step. +- 6) If no session record is stored for the Globally-Unique-Address AVP or the User-Name AVP, return an information query with the Experimental-Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_USER\_UNKNOWN and stop this procedure. Otherwise, go to the next step. + +- 7) Under temporary overload conditions, the TLM-PE shall stop processing the request and return an information query response with the Experimental-Result-Code set to DIAMETER\_USER\_DATA\_NOT\_AVAILABLE and stop this procedure. The SCE may retry retrieving the required information at a later stage. Otherwise, go to the next step. +- 8) If the TLM-PE cannot fulfil the received request for reasons not stated in the above steps, e.g., due to database error, it shall stop processing the request and set the Result-Code to DIAMETER\_UNABLE\_TO\_COMPLY. +- 9) Check which session data can be returned to the SCE, based on local policy rules and per-subscriber privacy information stored in the TLM-PE. If the session data to be retrieved is currently being updated by another entity, the TLM-PE may delay the response message until the update has been completed and shall include in the response message the updated data requested. The requested operation shall take place and the TLM-PE shall return the Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_SUCCESS and the session data in the information query response and stop this procedure. + +### 7.2.2 Event registration + +#### 7.2.2.1 Overview + +This procedure is used by an SCE to subscribe with the TLM-PE to a particular event. This procedure is mapped to the commands Subscribe-Notifications-Request/Answer defined in the Diameter application specified in Sh interface [ETSI TS 129 329]. Tables 7-3 and 7-4 detail the involved information elements as identified in the NACE and their mapping to Diameter AVPs. + +**Table 7-3 – Event registration request** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|---------------------------------|----------------------------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Subs-Req-Type | M | Indicates whether the SCE is willing to subscribe or unsubscribe to the notification of the event. | +| Unique IP address | Globally-unique-Address | C | This information element contains:
– The IP address of the user equipment used by the subscriber for which profile information is being pushed.
– The addressing domain in which the IP address is significant. | +| Address realm | | | | +| Transport subscriber identifier | User-Name | C | The user that is attached to the network. | +| Subscription duration | Expiry-Time | O | Duration for which the subscription to the event will be active. | +| Event | Event-Type | M | The type of event to be monitored. | +| SCE identity | SCE-Application-Identifier | M | Identifies the SCE originating the request. | + +**Table 7-4 – Event registration response** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Result | Result-Code/
Experimental-Result | M | Result of the request.
Result-Code AVP shall be used for errors defined in the Diameter Base Protocol.
Experimental-Result AVP shall be used for other errors. This is a grouped AVP which contains the 3GPP Vendor ID in the Vendor-Id AVP, and the error code in the Experimental-Result-Code AVP. | +| | Expiry-Time | O | Acknowledges the absolute time at which the subscription expires. | + +The TLM-PE monitors events related to access sessions. Monitoring of a particular event on a particular session is activated when at least one application function has subscribed to be notified of the occurrence of the event. Subscription to an event may be done implicitly (i.e., through management operations) or explicitly using the event registration/deregistration request. Subscription to an event ceases when one of the following conditions is met: + +- Expiry of the subscription duration. +- Removal of the session record from the TLM-PE. +- Receipt of an explicit request to unsubscribe. + +#### **7.2.2.2 Procedure at the SCE side** + +The SCE shall populate the event registration request as follows: + +- 1) Insert a Subs-Req-Type AVP indicating whether it is willing to subscribe or unsubscribe to the notification of events. +- 2) Insert either a Globally-Unique-Address or a User-Name AVP. The Globally-Unique-Address AVP shall contain a Frame-IP-Address or Frame-IPv6-Prefix AVP value, and an Address-Realm AVP. The Address-Realm AVP shall be included and set either using configuration data (in which case all user equipment served by the SCE is assumed to belong to the same addressing domain) or from the physical or logical interface over which was received a related service request. +- 3) The SCE-Application-Identifier AVP shall be present. +- 4) At least one occurrence of the Event-Type AVP shall be present. +- 5) The Expiry-Time AVP may be present. + +#### **7.2.2.3 Procedure at the TLM-PE side** + +Upon reception of an event registration/deregistration request, the TLM-PE shall, in the following order: + +- 1) Based on the contents of the SCE-Application-Identifier AVP, check whether the SCE is allowed to request monitoring of events. If not, return an event registration response with Result-Code set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_OPERATION\_NOT\_ALLOWED. +- 2) If the Globally-Unique-Address AVP is present, use this information as a key to identify the session for which event monitoring is being requested. +- 3) If the Globally-Unique-Address AVP is absent but the User-Name AVP is present, use the latter information as a key to the session(s) for which event monitoring is being requested. + +- 4) If both the Globally-Unique-Address AVP and the User-Name AVP are absent, return an event registration/deregistration response with the Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_MISSING\_AVP. +- 5) If no stored session record matches the Globally-Unique-Address AVP or the User-Name AVP and the requested event differs from USER-LOGON, return an event registration response with the Experimental-Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_USER\_UNKNOWN. If the Subs-Req-Type AVP indicates that this is a request to subscribe to the notification of events, the TLM-PE shall check whether the requested event can be reported to the SCE, based on local policy rules and per-subscriber privacy information received from the TAA-PE. If the SCE is not allowed to request monitoring of the event, return an event registration/deregistration response with Result-Code set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_OPERATION\_NOT\_ALLOWED. If the SCE is allowed to request monitoring of the event, the TLM-PE shall: + - For all session records matching the request, associate the SCE-Application-Identifier with the list of entities that need to be notified when the event identified by the request occurs. The association lasts for the duration indicated by the value of the Expiry-Time AVP as returned to the SCE. If no Expiry-Time AVP is supplied, the TLM-PE should treat it as a request for an unlimited subscription. + - Include in the event registration response an Expiry-Time AVP with the absolute time at which the subscription expires in the case of a successful subscription. This time may be earlier than the requested expiry time. If the TLM-PE includes this AVP, then no notification shall be sent to the SCE after the expiration time. If the TLM-PE does not include this AVP, that indicates an unlimited subscription. + - Set the Result-Code to DIAMETER\_SUCCESS and return an event registration/deregistration response. + +If the Subs-Req-Type AVP indicates that this is a request to unsubscribe to the notification of events, the TLM-PE shall remove the association of the SCE-Identifier with the same list. The Result-Code shall be set to DIAMETER\_SUCCESS if the operation is successful or if the SCE-Identifier was not present in the list. If the Event-Type AVP is absent, the TLM-PE assumes that the SCE is willing to unsubscribe to all events associated with the User-Name or Globally-Unique-Address AVP. + +If a subsequent request is received by the TLM-PE where the Expiry-Time AVP is present but different from what the TLM-PE has previously stored, the TLM-PE should replace the stored expiration time with what was received in the request. + +If the TLM-PE cannot fulfil the received request for reasons not stated in the above steps, e.g., due to database error, it shall stop processing the request and set the Result-Code to DIAMETER\_UNABLE\_TO\_COMPLY. + +### 7.2.3 Notification event + +#### 7.2.3.1 Overview + +This procedure is used by a TLM-PE to notify the SCE of the occurrence of a particular event. This procedure is mapped to the commands Push-Notifications-Request/Answer in the Diameter application specified in Sh interface [ETSI TS 129 329]. Tables 7-5 and 7-6 detail the involved information elements as defined in the NACE and their mapping to Diameter AVPs. + +**Table 7-5 – Notification event request** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|---------------------------------|----------------------------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Unique IP address | Globally-unique-Address | C | This information element contains:
– The IP address of the user equipment used by the subscriber for which profile information is being pushed. | +| Address realm | | | – The addressing domain in which the IP address is significant. | +| Transport subscriber identifier | User-Name | C | The user that is attached to the network. | +| SCE identity | SCE-Application-Identifier | M | Identifies the SCE originating the request. | +| Event | Event-Type | M | The type of event to be monitored. | +| | [AVP] | O | AVPs carrying TLM-PE information associated to the reported event. | + +**Table 7-6 – Notification event response** + +| Information element name | Mapping to Diameter AVP | Cat. | Description | +|--------------------------|-------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Result | Result-Code/
Experimental-Result | M | Result of the request.
Result-Code AVP shall be used for errors defined in the Diameter Base Protocol.
Experimental-Result AVP shall be used for other errors. This is a grouped AVP which contains the 3GPP Vendor ID in the Vendor-Id AVP, and the error code in the Experimental-Result-Code AVP. | + +#### **7.2.3.2 Procedure at the TLM-PE side** + +When a monitored event is detected on a particular access session, the TLM-PE issues an event notification request to each of the application functions having registered to this event. + +The event notification request is populated as follows: + +- 1) At least a Globally-Unique-Address or a User-Name AVP shall be included. The Globally-Unique-Address AVP shall contain a Frame-IP-Address or Frame-IPv6-Prefix AVP value, and an Address-Realm AVP. The Address-Realm AVP shall be included and set either using configuration data (in which case all terminal equipment served by the SCE belongs to the same addressing domain) or from the physical or logical interface over which was received a related service request. +- 2) The SCE-Application-Identifier AVP shall be present. +- 3) One or more occurrence of the Event-Type AVP indicating the type of events being notified. + +Based on local policy rules and per-subscriber privacy information previously received from the TAA-PE, the TLM-PE may also include additional information in the event registration/deregistration request. Table 7-7 provides an indication of the AVPs that may be returned for each event. + +**Table 7-7 – Request-Information to AVP mapping** + +| Event | AVP | +|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| USER-LOGON | IP-Connectivity-Status | +| LOCATION-INFORMATION-CHANGED | Location-Information | +| RACE-CONTACT-POINT-CHANGED | RACE-Contact-Point | +| ACCESS-NETWORK-TYPE-CHANGED | Access-Network-Type | +| CPE-TYPE-CHANGED | CPE-Type | +| LOGICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER-CHANGED | Logical-Connection-Identifier | +| PHYSICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER-CHANGED | Physical-Connection-Identifier | +| DEFAULT-CONFIGURATION-CHANGED | Default-Configuration | +| TRANSPORT-RESOURCE-SUBSCRIPTION-CHANGED | Transport-Resource-Subscription | +| IP-ADDRESS-CHANGED | Globally-Unique-Address | +| USER-LOGOFF | IP-Connectivity-Status | + +#### 7.2.3.3 Procedure at the SCE side + +Upon reception of a notification event request, the SCE shall: + +- 1) If neither the globally unique identifier contained in the Globally-Unique-Address AVP nor the subscriber identifier contained in the User-Name AVP are known, return a notification event response with a Result-Code AVP value set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_USER\_UNKNOWN. +- 2) If the event type contained in the Event-Type AVP is not known, return a notification event response with a Result-Code AVP value set to DIAMETER\_INVALID\_AVP\_VALUE. +- 3) If the event type contained in the Event-Type AVP is known but was not expected, return a notification event response with a Result-Code AVP value set to DIAMETER\_ERROR\_NO\_SUBSCRIPTION\_TO\_DATA. + +If the SCE cannot process the event for reasons not stated in the above steps, return a notification event response with a Result-Code AVP value set to DIAMETER\_UNABLE\_TO\_COMPLY or an Experimental-Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_SYSTEM\_UNAVAILABLE. In the latter case, the TLM-PE is expected to retry after a provisioned time period. After a provisioned number of unsuccessful retries, the TLM-PE is expected to delete the SCE-Identity from the list of application functions registered to the event. + +Otherwise, the event shall be processed and the SCE shall return the Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER\_SUCCESS in the notification event response. + +# 8 Use of the Diameter base protocol + +With the clarifications listed in the following clauses, the Diameter base protocol defined by [IETF RFC 3588] shall apply. + +## 8.1 Securing Diameter messages + +For secure transport of Diameter messages, IPSec may be used. Guidelines on the use of SCTP with IPSec can be found in [IETF RFC 3554]. + +## 8.2 Accounting functionality + +Accounting functionality (accounting session state machine, related command codes and AVPs) is not used on the S-TC1 interface. + +## 8.3 Use of sessions + +Diameter sessions are implicitly terminated. An implicitly terminated session is one for which the server does not maintain state information. The client does not need to send any re-authorization or session termination requests to the server. + +The Diameter base protocol includes the Auth-Session-State AVP as the mechanism for the implementation of implicitly terminated sessions. + +The client (server) shall include in its requests (responses) the Auth-Session-State AVP set to the value NO\_STATE\_MAINTAINED (1), as described in [IETF RFC 3588]. As a consequence, the server does not maintain any state information about this session and the client does not need to send any session termination request. Neither the Authorization-Lifetime AVP nor the Session-Timeout AVP shall be present in requests or responses. + +## 8.4 Transport protocol + +Diameter messages over the S-TC1 interface shall make use of SCTP [IETF RFC 2960] and shall utilize the new SCTP checksum method specified in [IETF RFC 3309]. + +## 8.5 Routing considerations + +This clause specifies the use of the Diameter routing AVPs Destination-Realm and Destination-Host. + +With regard to the Diameter protocol defined over the S-TC1 interface, the TLM-PE acts as a Diameter server and the SCE acts as the Diameter client. + +If a SCE knows the address/name of the TLM-PE for a certain user, both the Destination-Realm and Destination-Host AVPs shall be present in the request. Otherwise, only the Destination-Realm AVP shall be present and the command shall be routed to a proxy TLM-PE, based on the Diameter routing table in the client. The proxy TLM-PE shall act as a Diameter relay as described in [IETF RFC 3588]. + +Requests initiated by the TLM-PE towards a SCE shall include both Destination-Host and Destination-Realm AVPs. The TLM-PE obtains the Destination-Host AVP to use in requests towards a SCE from configuration data or information received from the TAA-PE/TUP-PE. Consequently, the Destination-Host AVP is declared as mandatory in the ABNF for all requests initiated by the TLM-PE. Destination-Realm AVP is declared as mandatory in the ABNF for all requests. + +To ensure that messages are routed to the correct application at the destination host, the Diameter message header of each message sent shall contain either the S-TC1 application identifier (16777245) or the e2 application identifier (16777231) as agreed during CER/CEA negotiation. (See clause 8.6) + +## 8.6 Advertising application support + +The Capabilities-Exchange-Request and Capabilities-Exchange-Answer commands are specified in the Diameter Base Protocol [IETF RFC 3588]. The Diameter base application identifier (0) shall be used in the Diameter message header of these messages. + +If both the SCE and TLM-PE indicate support of the S-TC1 application, then the S-TC1 application identifier (16777245) shall be used in the Diameter message header of all subsequent messages + +exchanged within this association. Otherwise, the e2 application identifier (16777231) shall be placed in those headers. + +Support of the S-TC1 application within the CER/CEA is indicated by supplying an instance of the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id containing a Vendor-Id AVP set to ITU-T (11502) and an Auth-Application-Id AVP set to S-TC1 (16777245). Support of the e2 application within the CER/CEA is indicated by supplying an instance of the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id containing a Vendor-Id AVP set to ETSI (13019) and an Auth-Application-Id AVP set to e2 (16777231). + +The SCE and TLM-PE shall advertise the support of AVPs specified in 3GPP, ETSI, and ITU-T documents by including the values 10415 (3GPP), 13019 (ETSI), and 11502 (ITU-T) in three different instances of the Supported-Vendor-Id AVP in the CER and CEA commands respectively. + +**Table 8-1 – Vendor identifiers for S-TC1** + +| Vendor | Vendor identifier | +|--------|-------------------| +| 3GPP | 10415 | +| ETSI | 13019 | +| ITU-T | 11502 | + +NOTE – The Vendor-Id AVP included in Capabilities-Exchange-Request and Capabilities-Exchange-Answer commands that are not included in the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id AVPs, as described above, shall indicate the manufacturer of the Diameter node as per [IETF RFC 3588]. + +# 9 Message specification + +## 9.1 Commands + +This Recommendation reuses the Diameter command defined in [ETSI TS 129 329]. Other commands shall be ignored by the SCE and TLM-PE. + +**Table 9-1 – Command code** + +| Command | Abbreviation | Defining reference | Command code | See clause | +|--------------------------------|--------------|--------------------|--------------|------------| +| User-Data-Request | UDR | ETSI TS 129 329 | 306 | 9.1.1 | +| User-Data-Answer | UDA | ETSI TS 129 329 | 306 | 9.1.2 | +| Subscribe-Notification-Request | SNR | ETSI TS 129 329 | 308 | 9.1.3 | +| Subscriber-Notification-Answer | SNA | ETSI TS 129 329 | 308 | 9.1.4 | +| Push-Notification-Request | PNR | ETSI TS 129 329 | 309 | 9.1.5 | +| Push-Notification-Answer | PNA | ETSI TS 129 329 | 309 | 9.1.6 | + +### 9.1.1 User-Data-Request (UDR) command + +The User-Data-Request (UDR) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 306 and the "R" bit set in the command flags field, is sent by a Diameter client to a Diameter server in order to request user data. This command is defined in [ETSI TS 129 329] and used with additional AVPs defined in this Recommendation. + +#### Message format + +``` +< User-Data-Request > ::= < Diameter Header: 306, REQ, PXY, 16777245> + < Session-Id > + { Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } + { Auth-Session-State } +``` + +``` + +{ Origin-Host } +{ Origin-Realm } +[ Destination-Host ] +{ Destination-Realm } +[ Globally-Unique-Address ] +[ User-Name ] +[ SCE-Application-Identifier ] +[ Requested-Information ] +*[ AVP ] +*[ Proxy-Info ] +*[ Route-Record ] + +``` + +### 9.1.2 User-Data-Answer (UDA) command + +The User-Data-Answer (UDA) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 306 and the "R" bit cleared in the command flags field, is sent by a server in response to the User-Data-Request command. This command is defined in [ETSI TS 129 329] and used with additional AVPs defined in this Recommendation. The Experimental-Result AVP may contain one of the values defined in clause 9.2. + +#### *Message format* + +``` + +< User-Data-Answer > ::= < Diameter Header: 306, PXY, 16777245> + < Session-Id > + { Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } + [ Result-Code ] + [ Experimental-Result ] + { Auth-Session-State } + { Origin-Host } + { Origin-Realm } + [ User-Name ] + [ Physical-Connection-Identifier ] + [ Logical-Connection-Identifier ] + [ Access-Network-Type ] + [ Location-Information ] + [ RACE-Contact-Point ] + [ CPE-Type ] + [ IP-Connectivity-status ] + *[ AVP ] + *[ Failed-AVP ] + *[ Proxy-Info ] + *[ Route-Record ] + +``` + +### 9.1.3 Subscribe-Notification-Request (SNR) command + +The Subscribe-Notification-Request (SNR) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 308 and the "R" bit set in the command flags field, is sent by a Diameter client to a Diameter server in order to request notifications of events. This command is defined in [ETSI TS 129 329] and used with additional AVPs defined in this Recommendation. + +#### *Message format* + +``` + +< Subscribe-Notification-Request > ::= < Diameter Header: 308, REQ, PXY, +16777245> + < Session-Id > + { Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } + { Auth-Session-State } + { Origin-Host } + { Origin-Realm } + [ Destination-Host ] + { Destination-Realm } + { Subs-Req-Type } + [ Expiry-Time ] + +``` + +``` + +[ Globally-Unique-Address ] +[ User-Name ] +[ SCE-Application-Identifier ] +*[ Event-Type ] +*[ AVP ] +*[ Proxy-Info ] +*[ Route-Record ] + +``` + +### 9.1.4 Subscribe-Notification-Answer (SNA) command + +The Subscribe-Notification-Answer command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 308 and the "R" bit cleared in the command flags field, is sent by a server in response to the Subscribe-Notification-Request command. The Result-Code or Experimental-Result AVP may contain one of the values defined in clause 9.2. + +#### *Message format* + +``` + +< Subscribe-Notification-Answer > ::= < Diameter Header: 308, PXY, 16777245> +< Session-Id > +{ Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } +[ Result-Code ] +[ Experimental-Result ] +{ Auth-Session-State } +{ Origin-Host } +{ Origin-Realm } +[ Expiry-Time ] +*[ AVP ] +*[ Failed-AVP ] +*[ Proxy-Info ] +*[ Route-Record ] + +``` + +### 9.1.5 Push-Notification-Request (PNR) command + +The Push-Notification-Request (PNR) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 309 and the "R" bit set in the command flags field, is sent by a Diameter server to a Diameter client in order to notify changes in the user data in the server. This command is defined in [ETSI TS 129 329] and used with additional AVPs defined in this Recommendation. + +#### *Message format* + +``` + +< Push-Notification-Request > ::= < Diameter Header: 309, REQ, PXY, 16777245> +< Session-Id > +{ Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } +{ Auth-Session-State } +{ Origin-Host } +{ Origin-Realm } +[ Destination-Host ] +{ Destination-Realm } +*[ Event-Type ] +[ Globally-Unique-Address ] +[ User-Name ] +[ Access-Network-Type ] +[ Location-Information ] +[ RACE-Contact-Point ] +[ CPE-Type ] +[ Logical-connection-identifier ] +[ Physical-connection-identifier ] +[ Access-Network-Type ] +[ Default-Configuration ] +*[ Transport-Resource-Subscription ] +[ IP-Connectivity-Status ] +*[ AVP ] +*[ Proxy-Info ] + +``` + +\*[ Route-Record ] + +### 9.1.6 Push-Notification-Answer (PNA) command + +The Push-Notification-Answer (PNA) command, indicated by the Command-Code field set to 309 and the "R" bit cleared in the command flags field, is sent by a client in response to the Push-Notification-Request command. The Experimental-Result AVP may contain one of the values defined in clause 9.2. + +#### *Message format* + +``` +< Push-Notification-Answer > ::= < Diameter Header: 309, PXY, 16777245> + < Session-Id > + { Vendor-Specific-Application-Id } + [ Result-Code ] + [ Experimental-Result ] + { Auth-Session-State } + { Origin-Host } + { Origin-Realm } + *[ AVP ] + *[ Failed-AVP ] + *[ Proxy-Info ] + *[ Route-Record ] +``` + +## 9.2 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values + +This clause defines specific values of the Experimental-Result-Code AVP used in this Recommendation. Most of these are imported from 3GPP and ETSI specifications, as indicated in the subclauses below. + +### 9.2.1 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values imported from ETSI TS 129 229 + +This subclause defines the specific values of the Experimental-Result-Code AVP imported from [ETSI TS 129 229] (vendor-id is ETSI): + +DIAMETER\_ERROR\_USER\_UNKNOWN (5001) + +The request failed because the IP address or Globally-Unique Address is not found. + +DIAMETER\_USER\_DATA\_NOT\_AVAILABLE (4100) + +The requested data is not available at this time to satisfy the requested operation. + +### 9.2.2 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values imported from ETSI TS 129 329 + +This subclause defines the specific values of the Experimental-Result-Code AVP imported from [ETSI TS 129 329] (vendor-id is ETSI): + +DIAMETER\_ERROR\_NO\_SUBSCRIPTION\_TO\_DATA (5107) + +The SCE received a notification of changes of some information to which it is not subscribed. + +## 9.3 AVPs + +The following tables summarize the AVPs used in this Recommendation, beyond those defined in the Diameter base protocol [IETF RFC 3588]. + +Table 9-2 describes the Diameter AVPs that are used within this Recommendation that have been defined by [ETSI ES 283 035], providing their AVP code values, types, possible flag values and whether or not the AVP may be encrypted. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs identified in Table 9-2 shall be set to ETSI (13019). These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information; however, the normative detail for these AVPs is contained in [ETSI TS 283 035]. + +**Table 9-2 – Diameter AVPs imported from ETSI ES 283 035** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Clause defined | Value type (Note 2) | AVP flag rules (Note 1) | | | | | +|-----------------------|----------|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------|-----|------------|----------|-------------| +| | | | | Must | May | Should not | Must not | May encrypt | +| Location-Information | 350 | 9.3.5 | Grouped | V | M | | | Y | +| RACE-Contact-Point | 351 | 9.3.6 | DiameterIdentity | V | M | | | Y | +| CPE-Type | 352 | 9.3.7 | OctetString | V | M | | | Y | +| Requested-Information | 353 | 9.3.3 | Enumerated | V | | | M | Y | +| Event-Type | 354 | 9.3.11 | Enumerated | V | M | | | Y | + +NOTE 1 – The AVP header bit, denoted as 'M', indicates whether support of the AVP is required. The AVP header bit, denoted as 'V', indicates whether the optional Vendor-ID field is present in the AVP header. For further details, see [IETF RFC 3588]. + +NOTE 2 – The value types are defined in [IETF RFC 3588]. + +Table 9-3 describes the Diameter AVPs defined by the e4 interface protocol [ETSI ES 283 034] and used within this Recommendation. These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information; however, the normative detail for these AVPs is contained in [ETSI ES 283 034]. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs defined in Table 9-3 shall be set to ETSI (13019). + +**Table 9-3 – Diameter AVPs imported from ETSI ES 283 034** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Clause defined | Value type | AVP flag rules | | | | | +|---------------------------------|----------|----------------|-------------|----------------|-----|------------|----------|-------------| +| | | | | Must | May | Should not | Must not | May encrypt | +| Globally-Unique-Address | 300 | 9.3.1 | Grouped | M, V | | | | Y | +| Logical-Connection-Identifier | 302 | 9.3.10 | OctetString | V | M | | | Y | +| Access-Network-Type | 306 | 9.3.4 | Grouped | V | M | | | Y | +| Default-Configuration | 303 | 9.3.14 | Grouped | V | M | | | Y | +| Transport-Resource-Subscription | 304 | 9.3.15 | Grouped | V | M | | | Y | +| IP-Connectivity-Status | 305 | 9.3.8 | Enumerated | V | M | | | Y | +| Physical-Connection-Identifier | 313 | 9.3.9 | UTF8String | V | M | | | Y | + +Table 9-4 describes the Diameter AVPs defined by the Gq interface protocol [ETSI TS 129 209] and used within this Recommendation. These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information; however, the normative detail for these AVPs is contained in [ETSI TS 129 209]. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs defined in Table 9-4 shall be set to ETSI (13019). + +**Table 9-4 – Diameter AVPs imported from ETSI TS 129 209** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Clause defined | Value type | AVP flag rules | | | | | +|----------------------------|----------|----------------|-------------|----------------|-----|------------|----------|-------------| +| | | | | Must | May | Should not | Must not | May encrypt | +| SCE-Application-Identifier | 504 | 9.3.2 | OctetString | M, V | | | | Y | + +Table 9-5 describes the Diameter AVPs defined by the Sh interface protocol [ETSI TS 129 329] and used within this Recommendation. These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information; however, the normative detail for these AVPs is contained in [ETSI TS 129 329]. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs defined in Table 9-5 shall be set to ETSI (13019). + +**Table 9-5 – Diameter AVPs imported from ETSI TS 129 329** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Clause defined | Value type | AVP flag rules | | | | | +|----------------|----------|----------------|------------|----------------|-----|------------|----------|-------------| +| | | | | Must | May | Should not | Must not | May encrypt | +| Expiry-Time | 709 | 9.3.13 | Time | V | | | M | Y | +| Subs-Req-Type | 705 | 9.3.12 | Enumerated | M, V | | | | Y | + +### 9.3.1 Globally-Unique-Address AVP + +The Globally-Unique-IP-Address AVP (AVP code 300 13019) is of type Grouped. + +#### *AVP format* + +``` +Globally-Unique-Address ::= < AVP Header: 300 13019 > + [Framed-IP-Address] + [Framed-IPv6-Prefix] + [Address-Realm] +``` + +### 9.3.2 SCE-Application-Identifier AVP + +The SCE-Application-identifier AVP (AVP code 504 13019) is of type OctetString, and it contains information that identifies the particular service that the SCE service session belongs to. + +### 9.3.3 Requested-Information AVP + +The Requested-Information AVP (AVP code 353 13019) is of type Enumerated. The following values are defined: + +- SUBSCRIBER-ID (0). +- LOCATION-INFORMATION (1). +- RACE-CONTACT-POINT (2). +- ACCESS-NETWORK-TYPE (3). +- CPE-TYPE (4). +- LOGICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER (5). +- PHYSICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER (6). +- ACCESS-NETWORK-TYPE (7). +- DEFAULT-CONFIGURATION (8). +- TRANSPORT-RESOURCE-SUBSCRIPTION (9). +- IP-CONNECTIVITY-STATUS (10). + +### 9.3.4 Access-Network-Type AVP + +The Access-Network-Type AVP (AVP code 306 13019) is of type Grouped, and it indicates the type of port on which the user equipment is connected and the type of aggregation network. + +*AVP format* + +``` +Access-Network-Type ::= < AVP Header: 306 13019 > + {NAS-Port-Type} + [Aggregation-Network-Type] +``` + +### 9.3.5 Location-Information AVP + +The Location-Information AVP (AVP code 350 13019) is of type Grouped. + +*AVP format* + +``` +Location-Information ::= < AVP Header: 350 13019 > + [Line-Identifier] + * [AVP] +``` + +### 9.3.6 RACE-Contact-Point AVP + +The RACE-Contact-Point AVP (AVP code 351 13019) is of type DiameterIdentity and identifies the RACE element to which resource reservation requests shall be sent. + +### 9.3.7 CPE-Type AVP + +The CPE-Type AVP (AVP code 352 13019) is of type OctetString and contains a value of the user class DHCP option (77). + +### 9.3.8 IP-Connectivity-Status AVP + +The IP-Connectivity-Status AVP (AVP code 305 13019) is of type Enumerated. + +The following values are defined: + +- IP-CONNECTIVITY-ON (0). +- IP-CONNECTIVITY-LOST (1). + +### 9.3.9 Physical-Connection-Identifier AVP + +The Physical-Connection-Identifier AVP (AVP code 313 13019) is of type UTF8String and identifies the physical access to which the user equipment is connected. It includes a port identifier and the identity of the access node where the port resides. + +### 9.3.10 Logical-Connection-Identifier AVP + +The Logical-connection-identifier AVP (AVP code 302 13019) is of type OctetString. This AVP contains either a Circuit-ID (as defined in IETF RFC 3046) or a technology-independent identifier. + +NOTE – In the xDSL/ATM case, the logical access ID may explicitly contain the identity of the VP and VC carrying the traffic. + +### 9.3.11 Event-Type AVP + +The Event-Type AVP (AVP code 354 13019) is of type Enumerated. The following values are defined: + +- USER-LOGON (0). +- LOCATION-INFORMATION-CHANGED (1) +- RACE-CONTACT-POINT-CHANGED (2) +- ACCESS-NETWORK-TYPE-CHANGED (3) +- CPE-TYPE-CHANGED (4) + +- LOGICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER-CHANGED (5) +- PHYSICAL-CONNECTION-IDENTIFIER-CHANGED (6) +- IP-ADDRESS-CHANGED (7) +- DEFAULT-CONFIGURATION-CHANGED (8) +- TRANSPORT-RESOURCE-SUBSCRIPTION-CHANGED (9) +- USER-LOGOFF (10) + +The USER-LOGON event is reported when the TLM-PE successfully creates a session record. + +The USER-LOGOFF event is reported when the TLM-PE suppresses a session record. + +All other events are reported when the related part of the session record is modified. + +### 9.3.12 Subs-Req-Type AVP + +The Subs-Req-Type AVP (AVP code 705 13019) is of type Enumerated, and indicates the type of the subscription-to-notifications request. The following values are defined: + +- SUBSCRIBE (0): This value is used by an SCE to subscribe to notifications of changes in data. +- UNSUBSCRIBE (1): This value is used by an SCE to unsubscribe to notifications of changes in data. + +### 9.3.13 Expiry-Time AVP + +The Expiry-Time AVP (AVP code 709 13019) is of type Time. This AVP contains the expiry time of subscriptions to notifications in the TLM-PE. + +### 9.3.14 Default-Configuration AVP + +The Default-Configuration AVP (AVP code 303 13019) is of type Grouped. + +*AVP format* + +``` +Default-Configuration ::= < AVP Header: 303 13019 > + 1* {NAS-Filter-Rule} + [Maximum-Allowed-Bandwidth-UL] + [Maximum-Allowed-Bandwidth-DL] +``` + +### 9.3.15 Transport-Resource-Subscription AVP + +The Transport-Resource-Subscription AVP (AVP code 304 13019) represents Transport-Resource-Subscription element and is of type Grouped. + +*AVP format* + +``` +Transport-Resource-Subscription ::= < AVP Header: 304 13019 > + * [Application-Class-ID] + * [Media-Type] + [Reservation-Priority] + [Maximum-Allowed-Bandwidth-UL] + [Maximum-Allowed-Bandwidth-DL] + [Transport-Class] +``` + +## 9.4 Use of namespaces + +This clause contains the namespaces that have either been created in this Recommendation, or the values assigned to existing namespaces managed by IANA. + +### **9.4.1 AVP codes** + +This Recommendation uses AVP values from the AVP code namespace managed by ETSI for its Diameter vendor-specific applications. See clause 9.3. + +### **9.4.2 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values** + +This Recommendation assigns the Experimental-Result-Code AVP values from the AVP code namespace managed by ETSI for its Diameter vendor-specific applications. See clause 9.2. + +### **9.4.3 Command code values** + +This Recommendation does not assign command code values but uses existing commands defined by the IETF, including those requested by 3GPP. + +### **9.4.4 Application-ID value** + +This Recommendation defines the S-TC1 Diameter application with application ID 16777245. The vendor identifier assigned by IANA to ITU-T () is 11502. + +# **10 Security considerations** + +These security requirements within the functional requirements and architecture of the NACF are addressed by the security requirements for NGN [ITU-T Y.2701]. The S-TC1 interface shall follow the security requirements of the NACF. + +Clause 8.1 recommends the use of IPSec to ensure secure transport of Diameter messages. Guidelines on the use of SCTP with IPSec can be found in [IETF RFC 3554]. + +Further considerations along this line are provided in the security considerations section of [IETF RFC 3588], which operators are advised to consult. + +# Annex A + +## Scenarios using S-TC1 + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +## A.1 CASE 1: NACE-SCE bundled authentication based on line information + +![Sequence diagram for NACE-SCE bundled authentication for the fixed access network only. The diagram shows interactions between NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLME-PE (NACE), P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, and SAA-PE/SUP-PE (SCE).](3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant NGN_UE as NGN UE + subgraph NACE + participant AM_PE as AM-PE + participant TAA_PE_TUP_PE as TAA-PE/TUP-PE + participant TLME_PE as TLME-PE + end + subgraph SCE + participant P_CSC_PE as P-CSC-PE + participant I_CSC_PE as I-CSC-PE + participant S_CSC_PE as S-CSC-PE + participant SAA_PE_SUP_PE as SAA-PE/SUP-PE + end + + Note left of NGN_UE: NACF Authentication & Network Attachment + Note left of NGN_UE: Trying service authentication + + NGN_UE->>P_CSC_PE: 1.REGISTER + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Security association required? + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Yes + Note right of P_CSC_PE: 2. UDR (IP address) + Note right of P_CSC_PE: 3. UDA (location Info.=line id) + Note right of P_CSC_PE: S-TC1 I/F + P_CSC_PE->>I_CSC_PE: 4.REGISTER (P-Access Network-info = line id) + I_CSC_PE->>SAA_PE_SUP_PE: 5.UAR + SAA_PE_SUP_PE-->>I_CSC_PE: 6.UAA + I_CSC_PE->>S_CSC_PE: 7.REGISTER (P-Access Network-info = line id) + S_CSC_PE->>SAA_PE_SUP_PE: 8.MAR + Note right of SAA_PE_SUP_PE: Check User profile + SAA_PE_SUP_PE-->>S_CSC_PE: 9.MAA (line id) + Note right of S_CSC_PE: Compare line id? + Note right of S_CSC_PE: equal + S_CSC_PE->>SAA_PE_SUP_PE: 10.SAR + SAA_PE_SUP_PE-->>S_CSC_PE: 11.SAA + S_CSC_PE->>I_CSC_PE: 12.200 OK + I_CSC_PE->>P_CSC_PE: 13.200 OK + P_CSC_PE->>NGN_UE: 14.200 OK + Note right of SAA_PE_SUP_PE: Q.3221(08)_FA.1 + +``` + +Sequence diagram for NACE-SCE bundled authentication for the fixed access network only. The diagram shows interactions between NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLME-PE (NACE), P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, and SAA-PE/SUP-PE (SCE). + +Figure A.1 – NACE-SCE bundled authentication for the fixed access network only + +This clause describes how UEs undergo authentication in NACE and simultaneously gain service layer authentication using the single sign-on NACE-SCE bundled authentication with line information. + +- 0) The UE gets network attachment following the authentication at the NACE level. The TLM-PE in the NACE holds a binding between the IP address and the location information (contains the line identifier), held by the user as per the xDSL connectivity. The selection of the authentication (whether NACE-SCE bundled authentication is possible or not) is done at the SUP-PE level on an SCE-user basis. +- 1) The SIP REGISTER message reaches P-CSC-PE. +- 2) The P-CSC-PE knows whether or not security association is required at this point, based on the SIP signalling, presence of local policies and L3/L2 address. During the SIP registration, the P-CSC-PE locates the TLM-PE based on the UE's IP address or/and based on the information of the access network from which the P-CSC-PE receives the IP packet. P-CSC-PE performs a UDR request with the TLM-PE over the S-TC1 interface. The key for the query is the IP address used by the UE. +- 3) The TLM-PE sends the UDA response to the P-CSC-PE, including the location information of the UE. +- 4) The P-CSC-PE appends the NACE location information to the SIP REGISTER message and forwards the REGISTER message to the I-CSC-PE. +- 5) The I-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the UAR request. +- 6) The SUP-PE returns a UAA message for selecting the S-CSC-PE. +- 7) The I-CSC-PE forwards the REGISTER message to the S-CSC-PE. +- 8) The S-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the MAR request. +- 9) If line-based NACE bundling is the preferred authentication scheme, the SUP-PE returns a message with the location information of the user identified by IMPI and IMPU. +The S-CSC-PE performs final authentication by comparing the location information embedded in the REGISTER message with the location information received from the SUP-PE. If they match, the user is successfully authenticated. +- 10~14) If the UE is successfully authenticated, the S-CSC-PE assigns a unique IP address to the SUP-PE using the SAR message, and a SIP 200 OK message is then sent to the UE. + +## A.2 CASE 2: NACE-SCE bundled authentication based on the authentication context + +![Sequence diagram for NACE-SCE bundled authentication. The diagram shows interactions between NGN UE, NACE (AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE), and SCE (P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE). The process starts with NACF Authentication & Network Attachment and Trying service authentication. Step 0.1 involves pushing subscriber id and authentication context from TAA-PE/TUP-PE to SAA-PE/SUP-PE. Step 1 is REGISTER from NGN UE to P-CSC-PE. A decision 'Security association required?' follows. If 'Yes', steps 2 (UDR) and 3 (UDA) occur between TLM-PE and P-CSC-PE. Step 4 is REGISTER from P-CSC-PE to I-CSC-PE. Step 5 is UAR from I-CSC-PE to S-CSC-PE, with 6. UAA back. Step 7 is REGISTER from I-CSC-PE to S-CSC-PE. Step 8 is MAR from S-CSC-PE to SAA-PE/SUP-PE. A 'Check User profile' action occurs. Step 9 is MAA from SAA-PE/SUP-PE to S-CSC-PE. A decision 'Compare authentication context?' follows. If 'equal', step 10 is SAR from S-CSC-PE to I-CSC-PE, with 11. SAA back. Step 12.200 OK is sent from I-CSC-PE to P-CSC-PE, and 13.200 OK from P-CSC-PE to NGN UE. Finally, 14.200 OK is sent from NGN UE to TAA-PE/TUP-PE.](85e2327652d513a7fee8fdbf97ad06f1_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for NACE-SCE bundled authentication. The diagram shows interactions between NGN UE, NACE (AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE), and SCE (P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE). The process starts with NACF Authentication & Network Attachment and Trying service authentication. Step 0.1 involves pushing subscriber id and authentication context from TAA-PE/TUP-PE to SAA-PE/SUP-PE. Step 1 is REGISTER from NGN UE to P-CSC-PE. A decision 'Security association required?' follows. If 'Yes', steps 2 (UDR) and 3 (UDA) occur between TLM-PE and P-CSC-PE. Step 4 is REGISTER from P-CSC-PE to I-CSC-PE. Step 5 is UAR from I-CSC-PE to S-CSC-PE, with 6. UAA back. Step 7 is REGISTER from I-CSC-PE to S-CSC-PE. Step 8 is MAR from S-CSC-PE to SAA-PE/SUP-PE. A 'Check User profile' action occurs. Step 9 is MAA from SAA-PE/SUP-PE to S-CSC-PE. A decision 'Compare authentication context?' follows. If 'equal', step 10 is SAR from S-CSC-PE to I-CSC-PE, with 11. SAA back. Step 12.200 OK is sent from I-CSC-PE to P-CSC-PE, and 13.200 OK from P-CSC-PE to NGN UE. Finally, 14.200 OK is sent from NGN UE to TAA-PE/TUP-PE. + +Figure A.2 – NACE-SCE bundled authentication for both fixed and mobile access network + +This clause describes how UEs authenticate to NACE and simultaneously also gain service layer authentication using the single sign-on NACE-SCE bundled authentication with unique context information (for one example, we can use authentication context). + +Here, the NACE-SCE bundle authentication scenario example applicable, including the mobile access network, will be considered unlike the scenario of clause A.1. + +As to mobile subscriber, the line information does not exist like the fixed user. Therefore, the subscriber id and access authentication context need to be delivered towards SUP-PE in case of being authenticated. + +- 0) The UE gets network attachment after the authentication at the NACE level. +- 0.1) The TUP-PE delivers subscriber id and authentication context to the SUP-PE. The selection of the authentication (whether NACE-SCE bundled authentication is possible or not) is + +done at the SUP-PE level on the SCE-user basis. The relationship between subscriber identity and SCE-user identities (IMPI and IMPU) is already known to the SUP-PE. + +- 1) The SIP REGISTER message reaches P-CSC-PE. +- 2) The P-CSC-PE knows whether or not a security association is required at this point, based on the SIP signalling, presence of local policies and L3/L2 address. During the SIP registration, the P-CSC-PE locates the TLM-PE based on the UE's IP address or/and based on the information of the access network from which the P-CSC-PE receives the IP packet. The P-CSC-PE performs the UDR request toward the TLM-PE over the S-TC1 interface. The key for the query is the IP address used by the UE. +- 3) The TLM-PE sends the UDA response to the P-CSC-PE including the authentication context of the UE. +- 4) The P-CSC-PE appends the authentication context to the SIP REGISTER message and forwards the REGISTER message to the I-CSC-PE. +- 5) The I-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the UAR request. +- 6) The SUP-PE returns a UAA message for selecting the S-CSC-PE. +- 7) The I-CSC-PE forwards the REGISTER message to the S-CSC-PE. +- 8) The S-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the MAR request. +- 9) The SUP-PE returns a message with the authentication context of the user identified by the IMPI and IMPU, if authentication context based NACE bundling is the preferred authentication scheme. + +The S-CSC-PE finally authenticates by comparing the authentication context embedded in the REGISTER message with authentication context received from the SUP-PE. If they match, the user is successfully authenticated. + +- 10~14) If the UE is successfully authenticated, the S-CSC-PE assigns its own IP address to the SUP-PE using SAR message, and SIP 200 OK message is sent to the UE. + +## A.3 CASE 3: Information of PD-PE in RACE for providing QoS + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE, P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE, and PD-PE. The diagram is divided into two groups: NACE (AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE) and SCE (P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE). The sequence of messages is: 1. INVITE from NGN UE to P-CSC-PE; 2. UDR (IP address) from P-CSC-PE to TLM-PE; 3. UDA (PD-PE address) from TLM-PE to P-CSC-PE over S-TC1 I/F; 4. AAR from P-CSC-PE to PD-PE. Callouts indicate 'Requesting the contact information of the PD-PE' and 'Requesting to PD-PE about the service QoS'.](fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant NGN_UE as NGN UE + subgraph NACE + AM_PE[AM-PE] + TAA_TUP_PE[TAA-PE/TUP-PE] + TLM_PE[TLM-PE] + end + subgraph SCE + P_CSC_PE[P-CSC-PE] + I_CSC_PE[I-CSC-PE] + S_CSC_PE[S-CSC-PE] + SAA_SUP_PE[SAA-PE/SUP-PE] + end + PD_PE[PD-PE] + + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Requesting the contact information of the PD-PE + NGN_UE->>P_CSC_PE: 1. INVITE + P_CSC_PE->>TLM_PE: 2. UDR (IP address) + TLM_PE-->>P_CSC_PE: 3. UDA (PD-PE address) S-TC1 I/F + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Requesting to PD-PE about the service QoS + P_CSC_PE->>PD_PE: 4. AAR + +``` + +Q.3221(08)\_FA.3 + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE, P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE, and PD-PE. The diagram is divided into two groups: NACE (AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE) and SCE (P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE). The sequence of messages is: 1. INVITE from NGN UE to P-CSC-PE; 2. UDR (IP address) from P-CSC-PE to TLM-PE; 3. UDA (PD-PE address) from TLM-PE to P-CSC-PE over S-TC1 I/F; 4. AAR from P-CSC-PE to PD-PE. Callouts indicate 'Requesting the contact information of the PD-PE' and 'Requesting to PD-PE about the service QoS'. + +Figure A.3 – Information of PD-PE in RACE for providing QoS + +P-CSC-PE has to connect to PD-PE with Diameter for the service QoS request. Therefore, it is necessary to have the contact information of PD-PE. That information can be set up in advance or be inquired from NACE. Here, it is the scenario about the latter method. The latter method has the advantage that when P-CSC-PE is connected to several PD-PEs, PD-PE can be selected dynamically. We assume both that the attachment and authentication about the access network succeeds, and that the SIP register procedure about the service network was completed. + +- 1) The UE or CPE delivers the SIP INVITE message to P-CSC-PE through each attachment device. +- 2~3) P-CSC-PE requests the contact information of the PD-PE allocated to a user from NACE and is responded. +- 4) P-CSC-PE requests AAR to PD-PE about the service QoS using the contact information of the PD-PE allotted to a user. + +## **A.4 CASE 4: Location service based on fixed access line information with bundled authentication** + +![Sequence diagram for location-based service using fixed access line information. Lifelines include NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE (NACE group), P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE (SCE group), and AS-PE. The process involves registration, security association checks, user data retrieval, and subsequent location service requests.](7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant NGN_UE as NGN UE + subgraph NACE + participant AM_PE as AM-PE + participant TAA_PE_TUP_PE as TAA-PE/TUP-PE + participant TLM_PE as TLM-PE + end + subgraph SCE + participant P_CSC_PE as P-CSC-PE + participant I_CSC_PE as I-CSC-PE + participant S_CSC_PE as S-CSC-PE + participant SAA_PE_SUP_PE as SAA-PE/SUP-PE + end + participant AS_PE as AS-PE + + Note left of NGN_UE: NACF Authentication & Network Attachment + Note left of NGN_UE: Trying service authentication + NGN_UE->>P_CSC_PE: 1.REGISTER + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Security association required? + Note right of P_CSC_PE: Yes + Note right of P_CSC_PE: 2. UDR (IP address) + Note right of P_CSC_PE: 3. UDA (location Info.=line id) + Note right of P_CSC_PE: S-TC1 I/F + P_CSC_PE->>I_CSC_PE: 4.REGISTER (P-Access Network-info = line id) + I_CSC_PE->>S_CSC_PE: 5.UAR / 6.UAA + I_CSC_PE->>S_CSC_PE: 7.REGISTER (P-Access Network-info = line id) + S_CSC_PE->>SAA_PE_SUP_PE: 8.MAR + Note right of SAA_PE_SUP_PE: Check User profile + SAA_PE_SUP_PE->>S_CSC_PE: 9.MAA (line id) + Note right of S_CSC_PE: Compare line id? + Note right of S_CSC_PE: equal + S_CSC_PE->>I_CSC_PE: 10.SAR / 11.SAA + I_CSC_PE->>P_CSC_PE: 12.200 OK + P_CSC_PE->>NGN_UE: 13.200 OK + Note left of NGN_UE: Trying location-based service + NGN_UE->>AS_PE: 15. Requesting location-based service (IP, IPrealm, id) + AS_PE->>S_CSC_PE: 16. Requesting line information of the public identifier (IP, IP realm, id) + S_CSC_PE->>AS_PE: 17. line info. of the public identifier + AS_PE->>NGN_UE: 18. Providing location-based service + Note right of NGN_UE: Q.3221(08)_FA.4 + +``` + +Sequence diagram for location-based service using fixed access line information. Lifelines include NGN UE, AM-PE, TAA-PE/TUP-PE, TLM-PE (NACE group), P-CSC-PE, I-CSC-PE, S-CSC-PE, SAA-PE/SUP-PE (SCE group), and AS-PE. The process involves registration, security association checks, user data retrieval, and subsequent location service requests. + +**Figure A.4 – Location-based service by using fixed access line information** + +A location-based service provides a user with a preferable service by gathering and analysing a user's location information. For example, a general advertisement service of Internet portal does not consider a user's geographical location, so some restaurant advertisements are useless to users who live far from the restaurant. Location information may be a line identifier in the fixed access network, an access pointer in the mobile network, and a geographical location in the GPS environment. + +This clause describes how a location-based service provider (e.g., restaurant advertisement provider) can provide a service to UEs without explicit service authentication (by making use of bundled authentication). + +- 0) The UE gets network attachment after the authentication at the NACE level. The TLM-PE in the NACE holds a binding between the IP address and the location information (contains the line identifier), which the user holds per the xDSL connectivity. The selection of the authentication (whether NACE-SCE bundled authentication is possible or not) is done at the SUP-PE level on a SCE-user basis. +- 1) The SIP REGISTER message reaches P-CSC-PE. +- 2) The P-CSC-PE knows whether or not a security association is required at this point, based on the SIP signalling, presence of local policies and L3/L2 address. During the SIP registration, the P-CSC-PE locates the TLM-PE based on the UE's IP address or/and based on the information of the access network from which the P-CSC-PE receives the IP packet. P-CSC-PE performs a location information query toward the TLM-PE over the S-TC1 interface. The key for the query is the IP address used by the UE. +- 3) The TLM-PE sends the response to the P-CSC-PE, including the location information of the UE. +- 4) The P-CSC-PE appends the NACE location information to the SIP REGISTER message and forwards the REGISTER message to the I-CSC-PE. +- 5) The I-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the UAR request. +- 6) The SUP-PE returns a UAA message for selecting the S-CSC-PE. +- 7) The I-CSC-PE forwards the REGISTER message to the S-CSC-PE. +- 8) The S-CSC-PE queries the SUP-PE using the MAR request. +- 9) The SUP-PE returns a message with the location information of the user identified by the IMPI and IMPU, if line based NACE bundling is the preferred authentication scheme. +The S-CSC-PE finally authenticates by comparing the location information embedded in the REGISTER message with location information received from the SUP-PE. If they match, the user is successfully authenticated. +- 10~14) If the UE is successfully authenticated, the S-CSC-PE assigns its own IP address to the SUP-PE using SAR message and SIP 200 OK message is sent to the UE. +- 15) A user selects location-based advertisement service through a UE, and the UE sends to AS-PE the IP address, the IP realm and a public identifier which were stored in the UE. +- 16) AS-PE sends IP address, IP realm and a public identifier to SAA-PE/SUP-PE to get the line information. +- 17) SAA-PE/SUP-PE sends the line information (such as assigned line identifier) to AS-PE. +- 18) AS-PE receives the user's line information and applies it to the location-based service. +- 19) AS-PE gives user a preferable advertisement service by making use of the user's line information. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T M.3050.1]Recommendation ITU-T M.3050.1 (2007), *Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM) – The business process framework.* +- [b-ITU-T Q.1706] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1706/Y.2801 (2006), *Mobility management requirements for NGN.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.2001] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2001 (2004), *General overview of NGN.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.2201] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2201 (2007), *NGN release 1 requirements.* + + + +# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86c694979e19afd71110c8915baf033f45ac95dc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6aae7771dce30f9fbe911c5c3dd6a226f8ae2fee6364dfc93fea10fe6293b19f +size 4008 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33d1f8d5050d0b2a9665fd1cf18688845943c48e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3301.1-201308-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c8e987a8fb451b51b38c3f0c59679761a84472a0bea87ca5a7a33d92b58999f0 +size 36233 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b46d335092e92f641a555d369dd792df5ae150e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e95bbf2a338e4121cac1023ab7982d303daff83fac9598edb7c79b49b3601ab0 +size 3883 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaadc5bf979c32f596a3ca58bcf13037df14bf62 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f55dc031b43f24a57b3e1720b10459fb37dd5ff108f6eddbe4c3d4b67172c6b2 +size 67775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e1d2b6d695f4c223ef8392c553e5139946de851 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3306.1-200910-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,536 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3306.1** + +(10/2009) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Resource control protocols + +--- + +**Resource control protocol no. 6 (rcp6) – +Protocol at the interface between intra-domain +policy decision physical entities (PD-PE) +(Rd interface)** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3306.1 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3999 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3649 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3849 | +| Testing for NGN networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## **Recommendation ITU-T Q.3306.1** + +## **Resource control protocol no. 6 (rcp6) – Protocol at the interface between intra-domain policy decision physical entities (PD-PE) (Rd interface)** + +## **Summary** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3306.1 specifies the rcp6 protocol used between intra-domain policy decision physical entities (PD-PEs) in the resource and admission control functional block. This interface operates across the Rd reference point as defined in Recommendation ITU-T Y.2111. It is used for inter-communication between PD-PEs that can optionally be deployed in larger domains for scalability reasons. + +## **Source** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3306.1 was approved on 29 October 2009 by ITU-T Study Group 11 (2009-2012) under Recommendation ITU-T A.8 procedures. + +## **Keywords** + +Diameter, RACF, Rd interface, Resource control. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2010 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 2 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Rd interface..... | 3 | +| 6.1 Overview ..... | 3 | +| 6.2 Functional elements and capabilities..... | 3 | +| 6.3 Rd interface protocol ..... | 4 | +| 7 Procedures ..... | 4 | +| 7.1 Initial reservation for a session..... | 4 | +| 7.2 Session modification ..... | 7 | +| 7.3 Session termination ..... | 8 | +| 7.4 PD-PE notifications ..... | 8 | +| 8 Protocol specifications..... | 9 | +| 9 Messages specifications..... | 9 | +| 9.1 Commands ..... | 9 | +| 9.2 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values ..... | 9 | +| 9.3 Attribute-Value Pairs (AVPs)..... | 10 | +| 10 Security considerations ..... | 11 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3306.1 + +## Resource control protocol no. 6 (rcp6) – Protocol at the interface between intra-domain policy decision physical entities (PD-PE) (Rd interface) + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the protocol used between intra-domain policy decision physical entities (PD-PEs) in the resource and admission control functional block. The functional requirements of the Rd interface are contained in clause 8.8 of [ITU-T Y.2111]. The Rd interface is the interface between intra-domain PD-PEs. + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T Q.3300] Recommendation ITU-T Q.3300 (2008), *Architectural framework for the Q.33xx series of Recommendations*. +- [ITU-T Q.3301.1] Recommendation ITU-T Q.3301.1 (2007), *Resource control protocol No. 1 – Protocol at the Rs interface between service control entities and the policy decision physical entity*. +- [ITU-T Y.2111] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2111 (2008), *Resource and admission control functions in next generation networks*. +- [ETSI TS 129 209] ETSI TS 129 209 V6.7.0 (2007), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Policy control over Gq interface (3GPP TS 29.209 version 6.7.0 Release 6)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 329] ETSI TS 129 329 V8.3.0 (2009), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Sh interface based on the Diameter protocol; Protocol details (3GPP TS 29.329 version 8.3.0 Release 8)*. +- [ETSI TS 183 017] ETSI TS 183 017 V2.3.1 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Resource and Admission Control: DIAMETER protocol for session-based policy set-up information exchange between the Application Function (AF) and the Service Policy Decision Function (SPDF); Protocol specification*. +- [ETSI ES 283 026] ETSI ES 283 026 V2.4.1 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Resource and Admission Control; Protocol for QoS reservation information exchange between the Service Policy Decision Function (SPDF) and the Access-Resource and Admission Control Function (A-RACF) in the Resource and Protocol specification*. + +[ETSI ES 283 034] ETSI ES 283 034 V2.2.0 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Network Attachment Sub-System (NASS); e4 interface based on the DIAMETER protocol.* + +[IETF RFC 3588] IETF RFC 3588 (2003), *Diameter Base Protocol.* + +[IETF RFC 4005] IETF RFC 4005 (2005), *Diameter Network Access Server Application.* + +## 3 Definitions + +### 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following term defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 policy decision physical entity (PD-PE)** [ITU-T Q.3300]: A device that implements the policy decision functional entity (PD-FE) as defined in clause 7.2.3.2 of [ITU-T Y.2111]. + +### 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation does not define any terms. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|--------|------------------------------------------------| +| AAA | AA-Answer | +| AAR | AA-Request | +| AVP | Attribute-Value Pair | +| CPN | Customer Premises Network | +| NAPT | Network Address and Port Translation | +| NAT | Network Address Translation | +| PD-PE | Policy Decision Physical Entity | +| PE-PE | Policy Enforcement Physical Entity | +| RAA | Re-Auth-Answer | +| RAC-PE | Resource and Admission Control Physical Entity | +| RAR | Re-Auth-Request | +| SCE | Service Control Entity | +| SDI | Session Description Information | +| STA | Session Termination Answer | +| STR | Session Termination Request | +| TRC-PE | Transport Resource Control Physical Entity | +| TRE-PE | Transport Resource Enforcement Physical Entity | + +## 5 Conventions + +There are no specific conventions in this Recommendation. + +# 6 Rd interface + +### 6.1 Overview + +The Rd interface is defined in [ITU-T Y.2111] and is used between intra-domain PD-PEs in the resource and admission control physical entity (RAC-PE). It is used for inter-communication between PD-PEs that can optionally be deployed in larger domains for scalability reasons. + +The Rd interface is shown in Figure 6-1, which depicts the generic resource and admission control functional architecture in NGN. It is based on Figure 5 of [ITU-T Y.2111], with the following modifications: + +- "Service control functions" is replaced by "Service control entity", +- "Network attachment control functions" is replaced by "Network attachment control entity", +- CGPE-FE is replaced by CGPE-PE, +- PD-FE is replaced by PD-PE, +- TRC-FE is replaced by TRC-PE, +- TRE-FE is replaced by TRE-PE, +- PE-FE is replaced by PE-PE, +- RACF is replaced by RAC-PE. + +![Figure 6-1: Generic resource and admission control functional architecture in NGN. The diagram shows a Service stratum and a Transport stratum. In the Service stratum, a Service control entity (SCE) is connected to a PD-PE via the Rs interface. The PD-PE is connected to a Network attachment control entity via the Ru interface and to a CGPE-PE via the Rh interface. The CGPE-PE is connected to a CPN. The PD-PE is also connected to a TRC-PE via the Rd interface. The TRC-PE is connected to a TRE-PE via the Rn interface and to a PE-PE via the Rc interface. The TRE-PE and PE-PE are connected to a Transport physical entity. The Transport physical entity is connected to Other NGNs via the Ri interface. The Rd interface is highlighted with a red arrow and labeled 'Scope of this Recommendation'.](367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the functional architecture in NGN, divided into Service and Transport strata. The Service stratum includes the Service control entity (SCE), Network attachment control entity, CGPE-PE, and CPN. The Transport stratum includes the RAC-PE (containing PD-PE, TRC-PE, TRE-PE, and PE-PE) and the Transport physical entity. Interfaces shown are Rs (SCE to PD-PE), Ru (PD-PE to Network attachment control entity), Rh (PD-PE to CGPE-PE), Rd (PD-PE to TRC-PE), Rn (TRC-PE to TRE-PE), Rc (TRC-PE to PE-PE), Ri (PD-PE to Other NGNs), and Rw (PD-PE to PE-PE). A red arrow labeled 'Scope of this Recommendation' points to the Rd interface. + +Figure 6-1: Generic resource and admission control functional architecture in NGN. The diagram shows a Service stratum and a Transport stratum. In the Service stratum, a Service control entity (SCE) is connected to a PD-PE via the Rs interface. The PD-PE is connected to a Network attachment control entity via the Ru interface and to a CGPE-PE via the Rh interface. The CGPE-PE is connected to a CPN. The PD-PE is also connected to a TRC-PE via the Rd interface. The TRC-PE is connected to a TRE-PE via the Rn interface and to a PE-PE via the Rc interface. The TRE-PE and PE-PE are connected to a Transport physical entity. The Transport physical entity is connected to Other NGNs via the Ri interface. The Rd interface is highlighted with a red arrow and labeled 'Scope of this Recommendation'. + +Figure 6-1 – Generic resource and admission control functional architecture in NGN + +### 6.2 Functional elements and capabilities + +The PD-PE communicates with the service control entity (SCE) over the Rs interface and interacts across the Rd interface with other PD-PEs within the same network domain. In the case where multiple PD-PEs are deployed, each one can handle a subset of the PE-PEs. If the PD-PE which receives a request over the Rs interface (i.e., the originating PD-PE) is not able to directly reach the targeted PE-PE, because of the network configuration, the originating PD-PE needs to communicate internally over Rd with an intra-domain peer PD-PE to reach the requested PE-PE. + +Detailed information about the PD-PE implementation can be found in clause 6.3 of [ITU-T Q.3300]. An example configuration of multiple PD-PEs is shown in Figure 2 of [ITU-T Q.3300]. + +### 6.3 Rd interface protocol + +Diameter [IETF RFC 3588] is the base protocol used for the PD-PE's interconnection via the Rd interface. + +## 7 Procedures + +### 7.1 Initial reservation for a session + +#### 7.1.1 Procedures at the originating PD-PE + +The originating PD-PE performs the admission control based on requirements from the SCE. The originating PD-PE requests an authorization for the session from the intra-domain peer PD-PE by sending the AA-Request (AAR) message. It is required that this AAR message contain a new Session-Id. + +The AAR message can optionally contain an Authorization-Lifetime attribute-value pair (AVP) to indicate the maximum lifetime that it is requesting. + +The AAR message can optionally include an Auth-Session-State AVP to indicate the originating PD-PE's preference for stateful or stateless operation. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally include the Operation-Indication AVP to indicate the following operations after receiving the AAR message: + +- the peer PD-PE must perform NAPT control and NAT traversal functions, or +- QoS resource reservation, or +- both. + +The originating PD-PE is required to include the corresponding Media-Component-Description AVP(s) into the AAR message, if the session description information (SDI) is already available. The originating PD-PE can optionally include the Flow-Grouping AVP(s) to request a particular grouping for the IP flows described within the SDI. + +When providing a given Media-Component-Description AVP in the initial AAR message, the originating PD-PE can optionally request the intra-domain peer PD-PE to commit the requested resources by setting the Flow-Status AVP to the value ENABLED, ENABLED-UPLINK or ENABLED-DOWNLINK. Alternatively, the originating PD-PE can optionally perform resource allocation in two phases using separate reserve and commit operations. If commitment is done in two phases, the Flow-Status AVP value of the initial AAR message is required to be set to DISABLED. + +If, based on local configuration data, the originating PD-PE determines that address translation needs to occur on the user plane (e.g., the PE-PE implements NAT, or NAPT, or the hosted NAPT procedure), the following action is performed: + +- after the originating PD-PE receives an SDI that is associated with the end-point served by it, the originating PD-PE is required to include the Binding-Information AVP with the Input-List AVP. + +The originating PD-PE optionally includes the SDP-Direction AVP along with the Binding-Information AVP. These indicate whether the address set in the Output-list AVP is expected to be received in the AAA message in either of the following: + +- the originating core network, or +- the peer core network. + +If required (e.g., in cases where the served end-point is behind a hosted-NAPT), the originating PD-PE can optionally include the Latching-Indication AVP set to 0. + +Based on local configuration data, the originating PD-PE can optionally include the TLM-PE-Identifier AVP in the AAR message to indicate the identifier of TLM-PE (e.g., IP address or domain name, etc.) related to the user. + +For the purpose of QoS profile correlation in an intra-domain peer PD-PE lying within an access network, the originating PD-PE is required to include, within the AAR message, a correlation identifier in the form of: + +- User-Name AVP, or +- Globally-Unique-IP-Address AVP. + +The User-Name AVP is defined in [IETF RFC 3588]. The Globally-Unique-IP-Address AVP is defined in [IETF RFC 4005]. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally specify the Reservation-Priority AVP in the AAR message or within a Media-Component-Description AVP in the AAR message, or both. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally specify the events it wants to be informed about in the Specific-Action AVP of the AAR message. + +The originating PD-PE is required to examine the content of any Auth-Session-State AVP it receives in the AAA message. If such an AVP is present and indicates stateful operation, the originating PD-PE is required to include the same Session-Id value as it placed in the initial AAR message in subsequent messages relating to this session. + +If a received Auth-Session-State AVP indicates stateless operation, the originating PD-PE is required to store the value of the Class AVP(s) also present in the AAA message. In the stateless operation, the originating PD-PE is required to include the stored Class AVP(s) in any message it sends to the intra-domain peer PD-PE relating to the same session. + +The originating PD-PE is required to store the contents of the Binding-Output-List AVP received within the Binding-Information AVP contained in the AAA message for future usage. + +The action of the originating PD-PE is a matter of policy when it does not receive the AAA message, when the AAA message arrives after the internal timer has expired, or when the AAA message arrives with an indication different from DIAMETER\_SUCCESS. + +#### **7.1.2 Procedures at the intra-domain peer PD-PE** + +The intra-domain peer PD-PE can optionally honour the preference indicated in the Auth-Session-State AVP, or can optionally make an independent decision based on local policy (whether or not it has received an Auth-Session-State AVP). If an Auth-Session-State AVP is present in the initial AAR message or if the intra-domain peer PD-PE chooses stateless operation for the current session, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to return an Auth-Session-State AVP in the AAA message to indicate its decision. + +In stateful operation, the intra-domain peer PD-PE stores the Session-Id value received in the AAR message. The same Session-Id value will be present in subsequent commands relating to this session, as described in [IETF RFC 3588]. The intra-domain peer PD-PE can use the received Session-Id values to locate the session related information in order to act on the commands. + +In stateless operation, the intra-domain peer PD-PE does not store the received Session-Id. Instead, it generates one or more Class AVPs based on local policy data which can be extracted possibly from the contents of the AAR message or from the messages received over other interfaces. The one or more Class AVPs will contain the information needed for the PD-PE to reconstruct its state when it receives additional messages relating to the same user session. This information can optionally include: + +- a unique string identifying the session corresponding to the initial AAR message; + +- the address(es) of the TRC-PE(s) involved in the session; +- the address of the PE-PE involved in the session. + +The Class AVP(s) is required to be returned to the originating PD-PE in the AAA message. The intra-domain peer PD-PE also forwards equivalent state-preserving tokens to the TRC-PE(s) and PE-PE when it communicates with them. Then the intra-domain peer PD-PE receives those tokens back again in messages from TRC-PE(s) and PE-PE. + +If the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP is present, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to use it to determine whether the initial AAR message is for: + +- authorization only (pull mode); +- authorization and reservation (push mode, first phase of two); or +- authorization, reservation and commitment (push mode, single-phase operation). + +The operation indicated by the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP applies to all IP flows identified by the AAR message. If the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP is not consistent with the Flow-Status AVP, the request is recommended to be rejected. + +A request for authorization only (pull mode) cannot be indicated in the absence of the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP. However, the intra-domain peer PD-PE can infer a request for authorization from the AAR message. This is done without involvement of the originating PD-PE if the Flow-Status AVP for a given media component or sub-component is set to DISABLED (3). Intra-domain peer PD-PE can infer a request for authorization if the Flow-Status AVP is set to any variant of ENABLED, (0), (1), or (2). + +The intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to use the contents of the AAR message to enforce any functions needed over the Rt and Rw interfaces. The intra-domain peer PD-PE recognizes policy enforcement functions requested on the transport plane based on the contents of an AAR message, and possibly on configuration data. + +If the AAR message contains the Media-Component-Description AVP(s), the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to trigger the resource reservation procedure towards the TRC-PE. If the AAR message contains Flow-Grouping AVP(s), the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to only authorize the QoS whenever the IP flows are distributed to the forwarding plane in a way that is allowed by the Flow-Grouping AVP(s). + +Additionally, based on the contents of the AAR message (e.g., the AAR message can optionally contain AVPs such as Service-Class) and on local policies, the intra-domain peer PD-PE can optionally request opening or closing of a gate. + +The intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to wait for the result of the above interaction(s) (i.e., the interactions described in this clause and up to this point in the text) before returning, in a single AAA message, the result of those interactions to the originating PD-PE. The AAA message is required to be sent only after all actions taken upon the Rt or Rw or both interfaces are achieved. The contents of the AAA message are required to be derived as follows: + +- If the resource reservation procedure succeeds and if the requested binding information was received via the Rw interface, the AAA message sent by the intra-domain peer PD-PE to the originating PD-PE is required to contain the allocated token in the Authorization-Token AVP (in pull mode). +- If the resource reservation procedure fails (i.e., the intra-domain peer PD-PE receives a reservation failure notification via the Rt interface), the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to return the Experimental-Result-Code AVP with the value INSUFFICIENT\_RESOURCES in the AAA message. + +- If the Resource Reservation procedure succeeds but the peer PD-PE did not succeed in getting a binding via the Rw interface, the peer PD-PE is required to return the Experimental-Result-Code AVP with the value BINDING\_FAILURE in the AAA message. Additionally, the peer PD-PE is required to release any associated requested resources through the Rt interface. + +### 7.2 Session modification + +#### 7.2.1 Procedures at the originating PD-PE + +During the session modification, the originating PD-PE is required to send an updated SDI to the intra-domain peer PD-PE. The updated SDI is based on exchanges within the SCE session signalling. The originating PD-PE does this by sending the AAR message, with an existing Session-Id, containing the Media-Component-Description AVP(s) which contains the updated service information. The originating PD-PE can optionally include the Flow-Grouping AVP(s) to request a particular grouping for the IP flows described within the service description. This is distributed to the forwarding plane. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally perform the following operations: + +- Add a new IP flow within an existing media component: provide a new Media-Sub-Component AVP within the corresponding Media-Component-Description AVP. +- Add a new IP flow within a new media component: provide a new Media-Component-Description AVP. +- Modify a media component: update the corresponding Media-Component-Description AVP (e.g., increase or decrease the allocated bandwidth). +- Modify an existing IP flow within a media component: update the corresponding Media-Sub-Component AVP. +- Modify the commitment status: change the Flow-Status AVP of the corresponding Media-Component-Description AVP and optionally Media-Sub-Component AVP to one of the values ENABLED-UPLINK (0), ENABLED-DOWNLINK (1) or ENABLED (2), according to the direction in which the resources are to be committed. +- Release a media component: provide the corresponding Media-Component-Description AVP with the Flow-Status AVP set to the value REMOVED (4). +- Release an IP flow within a media component: provide the corresponding Media-Sub-Component AVP with the Flow-Status AVP set to the value REMOVED (4). +- Refresh a soft-state: provide an Authorization-Lifetime AVP in the AAR message as a hint of the maximum lifetime that it is requesting. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally request the intra-domain peer PD-PE to revoke the commitment of requested resources by setting the Flow-Status AVP to the value DISABLED. + +The Reservation-Priority AVP associated with a reservation request or a media component is not to be modified, if present. + +If updated SDI pointing towards the end-point served by the originating PD-PE is available, and if the SDI pointing determines that address translation needs to occur on the user plane (e.g., the PE-PE implements NAT or NAPT or hosted NAPT procedures), the originating PD-PE is required to include the Binding-Information AVP with the Binding-Input-List AVP set based on the received SDI. + +If required (e.g., in cases where the served end-point is behind a hosted-NAPT), the originating PD-PE can optionally include the Latching-Indication AVP set to "RELATCH". + +The originating PD-PE is required to store for future use the contents of the Binding-Output-List AVP received within the Binding-Information AVP contained in the AAA message. + +Originating PD-PE's actions are matter of local policies for the following conditions: when the originating PD-PE does not receive the AAA message, or when it arrives after the originating PD-PE timer has expired, or when it arrives with an indication different from DIAMETER\_SUCCESS. + +#### **7.2.2 Procedures at the intra-domain peer PD-PE** + +The intra-domain peer PD-PE can optionally receive the AAR message from the originating PD-PE with modified service information. Based on the contents of the AAR message, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to coordinate any required modifications to the existing resource reservation over the Rt interface, to existing enabled policy enforcement settings, or to both. + +The intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to acknowledge the session modification by issuing an AAA message back to the originating PD-PE only after all actions taken upon the Rt, the Rw, or both interfaces are completed. + +Depending on the value of the Flow-Status AVP received from the originating PD-PE, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to interpret the session modification as a commitment of requested resources or as a removal of the commitment of requested resources. + +Once the intra-domain peer PD-PE recognizes, based on the contents of an AAR message and possibly on configuration data, that policy enforcement functions are requested on the transport plane, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to use the contents of the AAR message in order to enforce any functions needed over the Rw interface. + +### **7.3 Session termination** + +#### **7.3.1 Procedures at the originating PD-PE** + +When the session is terminated, in stateful operation the originating PD-PE is required to terminate the Diameter session. It terminates the Diameter session by sending a Session-Termination-Request (STR) message with the associated Session-Id AVP to the intra-domain peer PD-PE. In stateless operation, it is required to request session termination by sending an AAR message containing the associated Class AVP and the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP with a value of RESOURCE\_RELEASE (3). + +#### **7.3.2 Procedures at the intra-domain peer PD-PE** + +Session termination is signalled by receipt of an STR message from the originating PD-PE in stateful operation, or receipt of an AAR message containing the Resource-Reservation-Mode AVP with a value of RESOURCE\_RELEASE (3) in stateless operation. Upon receiving a signal that the session is to be terminated, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to trigger the session termination procedure over the Rt interface and revoke any transport plane actions associated with the session. + +### **7.4 PD-PE notifications** + +On a request basis, the Rd interface supports indication of relevant events such as revocation of established resource reservations. The intra-domain peer PD-PE sends unsolicited RAR messages to the originating PD-PE to notify such events. These messages are implicitly requested through policies established in the intra-domain peer PD-PE via the Specific-Action AVP of the initial AAR message. + +The originating PD-PE can optionally specify, in the Specific-Action AVP of the initial AAR message, the events it wants to be informed of. + +If one of the events supported at the Rd interface occurs, the intra-domain peer PD-PE is required to send an unsolicited RAR message to the originating PD-PE containing: + +- the value of the Specific-Action AVP, indicating the event that occurred; and +- optionally, the appropriate Abort-Cause AVP value. + +## 8 Protocol specifications + +The Diameter Base Protocol as specified in [IETF RFC 3588] is used to support information transfer at the Rd interface. Procedures and protocols in [IETF RFC 3588] or its future revisions by IETF are required to be applied. + +The User-Name AVP is defined in the Diameter base specification [IETF RFC 3588]. The Globally-Unique-IP-Address AVP is defined in the Diameter Network Access Server specification [IETF RFC 4005]. + +This Recommendation defines the Rd Diameter application ITU-T Rd with application ID 16777274. The vendor identifier assigned by IANA to ITU-T is 11502. + +## 9 Messages specifications + +### 9.1 Commands + +Existing Diameter command codes from the Diameter Base Protocol, [IETF RFC 3588]; the network access server diameter application, [IETF RFC 4005]; and the Sh application described in [ETSI TS 129 329], are used. Support for these commands is required as indicated in Tables 9-1 and 9-2. + +NOTE – The notion of NAS (network access server) is not used here; [IETF RFC 4005] is used for protocol purposes, not for its functional meaning. + +**Table 9-1 – Required commands for stateful operation** + +| Command | Abbreviation | Defining reference | Command code | +|-----------------------------|--------------|--------------------|--------------| +| AA-Request | AAR | [IETF RFC 4005] | 265 | +| AA-Answer | AAA | [IETF RFC 4005] | 265 | +| Re-Auth-Request | RAR | [IETF RFC 3588] | 258 | +| Re-Auth-Answer | RAA | [IETF RFC 3588] | 258 | +| Session-Termination-Request | STR | [IETF RFC 3588] | 275 | +| Session-Termination-Answer | STA | [IETF RFC 3588] | 275 | + +**Table 9-2 – Required commands for stateless operation** + +| Command | Abbreviation | Defining reference | Command code | +|------------|--------------|--------------------|--------------| +| AA-Request | AAR | [IETF RFC 4005] | 265 | +| AA-Answer | AAA | [IETF RFC 4005] | 265 | + +### 9.2 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values + +This clause defines specific values of the Experimental-Result-Code AVP used in this Recommendation. It is imported from ETSI specification, as indicated in clause 9.2.1. + +#### 9.2.1 Experimental-Result-Code AVP values imported from [ETSI ES 283 026] + +This clause defines the specific values of the Experimental-Result-Code AVP imported from [ETSI TS 283 026] (vendor-id is ETSI): + +INSUFFICIENT\_RESOURCES (4041) + +The PD-PE indicates insufficient resources to perform the requested action. + +### 9.3 Attribute-value pairs (AVPs) + +Tables 9-3 to 9-5 summarize the AVPs used in this Recommendation, beyond those defined in [IETF RFC 3588]. + +Table 9-3 describes the Diameter AVPs used within this Recommendation that have been defined by [ETSI TS 183 017], providing their AVP codes and value types. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs identified in Table 9-3 is required to be set to ETSI (13019). These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information, however the normative details for these AVPs are contained in [ETSI TS 183 017]. + +The mandatory flag (M) is optionally set for the Transport-Class AVP and is required to be cleared for all other AVPs in Table 9-3. The vendor flag (V) is required to be set for all AVPs in Table 9-3. ETSI vendor id (13019) is required to appear in the AVP header. All AVPs in Table 9-3 can optionally be encrypted. + +**Table 9-3 – Diameter AVPs imported from [ETSI TS 183 017]** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Value type | +|----------------------|----------|------------| +| Transport-Class | 311 | Unsigned32 | +| Binding-Information | 450 | Grouped | +| Binding-Input-List | 451 | Grouped | +| Binding-Output-List | 452 | Grouped | +| V6-Transport-Address | 453 | Grouped | +| V4-Transport-Address | 454 | Grouped | +| Port-Number | 455 | Unsigned32 | +| Reservation-class | 456 | Unsigned32 | +| Latching-Indication | 457 | Enumerated | +| Reservation-Priority | 458 | Enumerated | +| Service-Class | 459 | UTF8String | + +Table 9-4 describes the Diameter AVPs imported from [ETSI ES 283 034]. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs defined in Table 9-4 is required to be set to ETSI (13019). + +The mandatory flag (M) is required to be cleared for the AVPs listed in Table 9-4. The vendor flag (V) is required to be set for all AVPs in Table 9-4 and ETSI vendor id (13019) is required to appear in the AVP header. The AVPs in Table 9-4 are required to be sent unencrypted. + +**Table 9-4 – Diameter AVPs imported from [ETSI ES 283 034]** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Value type | +|----------------------------|----------|-------------| +| Globally-Unique-IP-Address | 300 | Grouped | +| Address-Realm | 301 | OctetString | + +Table 9-5 describes the Diameter AVPs defined in [ETSI TS 129 209] and used within this Recommendation. These AVPs are described in this Recommendation for information. The Vendor-Id header of all AVPs defined in Table 9-5 is required to be set to 3GPP (10415). + +[ITU-T Q.3301.1] modifies the syntax of certain Grouped AVPs defined in [ETSI TS 129 209] by adding one or more optional AVP(s) to the syntax specified in [ETSI TS 129 209]. AVPs defined in [ETSI TS 129 209] but not listed in the following table are not recommended to be sent by Diameter conforming to this Recommendation and are required to be ignored by receiving entities. + +The mandatory flag (M) is required to be set for the AVPs in Table 9-5. The vendor flag (V) is required to be set for all AVPs in Table 9-5 and 3GPP vendor id (10415) is required to appear in the AVP header. The AVPs in Table 9-5 can optionally be sent encrypted. + +**Table 9-5 – Diameter AVPs imported from [ETSI TS 129 209]** + +| Attribute name | AVP code | Value type | +|------------------------------------------|----------|--------------| +| Abort-Cause | 500 | Enumerated | +| Access-Network-Charging-Address | 501 | Address | +| Access-Network-Charging-Identifier | 502 | Grouped | +| Access-Network-Charging-Identifier-Value | 503 | OctetString | +| AF-Application-Identifier | 504 | OctetString | +| AF-Charging-Identifier | 505 | OctetString | +| Authorization-Token | 506 | OctetString | +| Flow-Description | 507 | IPFilterRule | +| Flow-Grouping | 508 | Grouped | +| Flow-Number | 509 | Unsigned32 | +| Flows | 510 | Grouped | +| Flow-Status | 511 | Enumerated | +| Flow-Usage | 512 | Enumerated | +| Specific-Action | 513 | Enumerated | +| Max-Requested-Bandwidth-DL | 515 | Unsigned32 | +| Max-Requested-Bandwidth-UL | 516 | Unsigned32 | +| Media-Component-Description | 517 | Grouped | +| Media-Component-Number | 518 | Unsigned32 | +| Media-Sub-Component AVP | 519 | Grouped | +| Media-Type | 520 | Enumerated | +| RR-Bandwidth | 521 | Unsigned32 | +| RS-Bandwidth | 522 | Unsigned32 | +| SIP-Forking-Indication | 523 | Enumerated | + +## 10 Security considerations + +The security aspects are not applicable to intra-domain operations. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a308271fb239928318c461337c31936dd84fe604 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f6a0f146a2a7abe73d858cf87904646fa5525273febbbbb82a1db78580ee044a +size 3757 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..068a91dcadca5e318d7438da6f70229e5a7d3e44 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3403-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3403** + +(02/2016) + +# **SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Service and session control protocols + +--- + +**IP multimedia call control protocol based on the +session initiation protocol and the session +description protocol – Basic call: Requirements +for the user side and the network side** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3403 + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3899 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3849 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +### Recommendation ITU-T Q.3403 + +## **IP multimedia call control protocol based on the session initiation protocol and the session description protocol – Basic call: Requirements for the user side and the network side** + +### **Summary** + +The IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) became one of the popular technical solutions which operators use to migrate from circuit switching networks to packet switching networks. Initially the IMS platform was created at the request of mobile operators, but nowadays fixed operators are also actively implementing the IMS platform. + +Furthermore, the regulations of some countries/regions demand that operators continue to provide the set of services that were available over the former circuit switching technologies (e.g., signalling system 7, intelligent networks, etc.). + +There are different implementations of the SIP-IMS protocols. Operators expressed their interest in establishing the universal requirements that end-user equipment and network equipment should meet. + +The version number, v.1, indicates that this is version one of Recommendation ITU-T Q.3403, and that it relates to Release 10 of the relevant 3GPP/ETSI standard. + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3403 (2016) endorses ETSI TS 124 229 V10.20.0 (2015-07), "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3" (3GPP TS 24.229 version 10.20.0 Release 10). It contains requirements for establishing the basic call using the IMS platform at the user and network sides. + +### **History** + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3403 v.1 | 2016-02-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/12715 | + +### **Keywords** + +IMS, network side, SDP, SIP, testing, user side. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +### INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2016 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +### Recommendation ITU-T Q.3403 + +## IP multimedia call control protocol based on the session initiation protocol and the session description protocol – Basic call: Requirements for the user side and the network side + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the requirements for user and network side for establishing the basic call using the IMS platform as described in ETSI TS 124 229 V10.20.0 (2015-07), "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3" (3GPP TS 24.229 version 10.20.0 Release 10). + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ETSI TS 124 229 V10.20.0] ETSI TS 124 229 V10.20.0 (2015-07), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3 (3GPP TS 24.229 version 10.20.0 Release 10)*. + +## 3 Definitions + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-----|------------------------------| +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Endorsement + +[ETSI TS 124 229 V10.20.0] + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..83228126a45dbf0992202c68d267674e22c04093 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/0897c77315bfe37a098f6b4ea39570d2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:45e6196f0127ecaf3f2f9e7b344fc262d9011913f9c8c2be1dfd604f205f7da5 +size 88112 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebe22fc6f26f03df1909b45b9453cb17210a1bf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa005640b0528fc16b326354040473327cc1ba0dcf6afa6fa98dc2714d0de1e9 +size 143477 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..631a329c8387fec7a741a4d1264c21ad6fbe22bc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abf79dc30f6de034825d1d420ad7e7342e5df4ede09ba4fad83082e5384df583 +size 99786 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ce02c097096a7142e418566bfc3fce901fb4ce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b0fd8d786e301c64992959c931dba038b5118456eebfcbb17eb36c954b018a3e +size 23117 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..adfff6b957de70d6f3a48cd62474bc69cd9ab6cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8dd88dce935a81cda1e3b7ff5438e591e46516c6a3262300b81d165a88e408ab +size 127391 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e410c91260348f18b3fc1657ae0d6420bfec4931 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:98e0e2df0e1946f923879ccf5548b3e8f113bd27c839b2ba5634ce7cc2bdd27b +size 23142 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9093483157c5285475233eabd80d8f1ba1e4ac0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2f8b88f2d646b1f9957fa4d2fdd177520ab1e0c0ad6955b227a26ad0e200f309 +size 115254 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cea30db337026661e7a1357b45d7d5b8d2e9a8b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8e620f14a13b10a5937f8eb30105a7ce140ea0eac8d2071ec570e51446e94b97 +size 141536 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/db7cb51aac8519daab50e2171cecae82_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/db7cb51aac8519daab50e2171cecae82_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8de097b508ec36054d744e3d361050ba7348917d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3610-200905-I_PDF-E/db7cb51aac8519daab50e2171cecae82_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:404215c5d5e29a8cb1682f6f1d769bdf331302b2a83f14111a547ab101e00b8e +size 21166 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3620-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3620-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11491aecdfb4e7f21b659ed8c76f7e74b46ecc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3620-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3def10b71910e6f548834d3797a805b85b6915cf24798d4217fe7a4ad2a37167 +size 4075 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3621-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3621-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11491aecdfb4e7f21b659ed8c76f7e74b46ecc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3621-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3def10b71910e6f548834d3797a805b85b6915cf24798d4217fe7a4ad2a37167 +size 4075 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90f23c5ef36a0e3c145a6b88653546fa92ad2a97 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:609b79b1efd94f0ee710d499d6659605494b7dc4207d9696660c0baebb206830 +size 3849 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1efb01ccbfccce3924c980152099cdbdb04c1fb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3627-201602-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3627** + +(02/2016) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Service and session control protocols – supplementary +services based on SIP-IMS + +--- + +**Closed user group using IP multimedia core +network subsystem – Protocol specification** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3627 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3899 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3849 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3627 + +## Closed user group using IP multimedia core network subsystem – Protocol specification + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3627 v.1 (2016) specifies requirements for supplementary service such as a closed user group (CUG) to be provided on the IMS platform. + +The version number, v.1, indicates that this is version one of Recommendation ITU-T Q.3627, and that it relates to Release 10 of the relevant 3GPP/ETSI standard. + +This Recommendation endorses ETSI TS 124 654 V10.3.0 (2013-04), "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Closed User Group (CUG) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem, Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 24.654 version 10.3.0 Release 10)". + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3627 v.1 | 2016-02-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/12725 | + +## Keywords + +CUG, IMS, network side, SDP, SIP, testing, user side. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2016 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3627 + +## Closed user group using IP multimedia core network subsystem – Protocol specification + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the requirements to protocols implementation for providing supplementary service such as a closed user group (CUG) on the IMS basis. + +The Recommendation endorses ETSI TS 124 654 V10.3.0 (2013-04), "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Closed User Group (CUG) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem, Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 24.654 version 10.3.0 Release 10)". + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ETSI TS 124 654 V10.3.0] ETSI TS 124 654 V10.3.0 (2013-04), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Closed User Group (CUG) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem, Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 24.654 version 10.3.0 Release 10)*. + +## 3 Definitions + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +CUG Closed User Group +IMS IP Multimedia Subsystem +IP Internet Protocol + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Endorsement + +[ETSI TS 124 654 V10.3.0]. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3628-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3628-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8c8ef290cbd72d8b1f34f581f71b8767884d399 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3628-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ed957fe3067ffdd7efbbc3bf42a8f159634c1c65a458ecc3813a4ec4f9644d92 +size 4119 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d029dd4fbf2b92152823b8298396c96c7282e426 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:476aa07e8e41a13b741a431c04ad0f9bd3a7bd0a3822f14a669b12f2abaf0e0d +size 3828 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..390c16bebb721abc5d243db7bc6624f407b11991 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3630-201703-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3630** + +(03/2017) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Service and session control protocols – supplementary +services based on SIP-IMS + +# --- **Inter-IMS network to network interface – Protocol specification** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3630 + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +### Recommendation ITU-T Q.3630 + +# Inter-IMS network to network interface – Protocol specification + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3630 v.1 (2017) specifies requirements for the Inter-IMS network to network interface (NNI). + +The version number, v.1, indicates that this is version one of Recommendation ITU-T Q.3630, and that it relates to Release 10 of the relevant 3GPP/ETSI standard. + +This Recommendation endorses the ETSI TS 129 165 V10.21.0 (2016-01) "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Inter-IMS Network to Network Interface (NNI) (3GPP TS 29.165 version 10.21.0 Release 10)". + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3630 v.1 | 2017-03-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/13246 | + +## Keywords + +IMS, Interworking. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2017 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +### Recommendation ITU-T Q.3630 + +# Inter-IMS network to network interface – Protocol specification + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the requirements for providing the Inter-IMS network to network interface (NNI). + +This Recommendation endorses ETSI TS 129 165 V10.21.0 (2016-01), Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Inter-IMS Network to Network Interface (NNI) (3GPP TS 29.165 version 10.21.0 Release 10). + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ETSI TS 129 165 V10.21.0] ETSI TS 129 165 V10.21.0 (2016-01) Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Inter-IMS Network to Network Interface (NNI) (3GPP TS 29.165 version 10.21.0 Release 10). +<[http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/129100\\_129199/129163/10.18.00\\_60/ts\\_129163v101800p.pdf](http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129100_129199/129163/10.18.00_60/ts_129163v101800p.pdf)> + +## 3 Definitions + +None + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +IMS IP Multimedia Subsystem + +NNI Network to Network Interface + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Endorsement + +[ETSI TS 129 165 V10.21.0] + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4385bbdaed6b277227841d4b8a003f44532b196 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:80fc82c7ba6dab206ee4da41a28f0e3ee604a6a2af15886ebdb753dd2b4d89e0 +size 5792 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5978871aa29a8723298f8cb26ff13e5c0e20867d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3631-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3631** + +(02/2022) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +Service and session control protocols – supplementary +services based on SIP-IMS + +--- + +**Interworking between ISDN and the IP +multimedia core network subsystem** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3631 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| VoLTE/ViLTE network signalling | Q.3640–Q.3655 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100–Q.4139 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050–Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.3631 + +## Interworking between ISDN and the IP multimedia core network subsystem + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3631 specifies the requirements for providing the interworking between the integrated services digital network (ISDN) and the IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem. + +This Recommendation endorses ETSI TS 183 036 (2021) "Core Network and Interoperability Testing (INT); ISDN/SIP interworking; Protocol specification". + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3631 | 2022-02-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/14921 | + +## Keywords + +IMS, interworking, SIP. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2022 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.3631 + +## Interworking between ISDN and the IP multimedia core network subsystem + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the requirements for providing the interworking between the integrated services digital network (ISDN) and the IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem. + +The Recommendation endorses [ETSI TS 183 036 V3.7.1 (2021)] "Core Network and Interoperability Testing (INT); ISDN/SIP interworking; Protocol specification". + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ETSI TS 183 036 V3.7.1] ETSI TS 183 036 V3.7.1 (2021), *Core Network and Interoperability Testing (INT); ISDN/SIP interworking; Protocol specification*. +<[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/183000\\_183099/183036/03.07.01\\_60/ts\\_183036v030701p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/183000_183099/183036/03.07.01_60/ts_183036v030701p.pdf)> + +## 3 Definitions + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|-------------------------------------| +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| IP | Internet protocol | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Endorsement + +[ETSI TS 183 036 V3.7.1] + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79c6856d4d07f6c9252b5d0a12539811fdd3d015 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2cd5e24898003642bcc6776ca163da8f0d394aa522ca020623826dda7914126d +size 59343 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d029dd4fbf2b92152823b8298396c96c7282e426 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:476aa07e8e41a13b741a431c04ad0f9bd3a7bd0a3822f14a669b12f2abaf0e0d +size 3828 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53e2198253f348f445f61c526f6935a5c6352fc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dab4d884debe39f02c9f5514cf621b3fc57305a61e1f452df0887bcd0d981f50 +size 81137 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39c1816f166f226cc83839768c85e0b98695adb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1f198b9e157685198e8013fce4e7445b3fee63364ea37218ed3a385bfe0c0647 +size 112380 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce2ee9f9805bac72ef0f02f373b53967691a1b84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3642-201904-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,916 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3642** + +(04/2019) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN – +VoLTE/ViLTE network signalling + +--- + +**IMS references to Release 12 for communication +between IMS and NGN networks to support +end-to-end service interoperability** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3642 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| General | Q.3000–Q.3029 | +| Network signalling and control functional architecture | Q.3030–Q.3099 | +| Network data organization within the NGN | Q.3100–Q.3129 | +| Bearer control signalling | Q.3130–Q.3179 | +| Signalling and control requirements and protocols to support attachment in NGN environments | Q.3200–Q.3249 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3300–Q.3369 | +| Service and session control protocols | Q.3400–Q.3499 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services | Q.3600–Q.3616 | +| Service and session control protocols – supplementary services based on SIP-IMS | Q.3617–Q.3639 | +| VoLTE/ViLTE network signalling | Q.3640–Q.3655 | +| NGN applications | Q.3700–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050–Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3642 + +## IMS references to Release 12 for communication between IMS and NGN networks to support end-to-end service interoperability + +## Summary + +In general, IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) implementation is based on a set of standards developed by different standards development organizations (SDOs). In this regard, there is an intention to develop a Recommendation which lists the references to specifications defining requirements for IMS to be used for the non-roaming architecture for 3GPP access as a basis for the communication between IMS and next generation networks (NGNs), in order to support end-to-end service interoperability. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3642 | 2019-04-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/13884 | + +## Keywords + +Core network, EP, EPC, IMS, IMT-Advanced, interoperability, LTE-Advanced, NGN, Release 12 + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2019 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 6 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 6 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 6 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 6 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 9 | +| 6 Introduction..... | 9 | +| 7 Overview of the interconnection between two different IM CN subsystems..... | 9 | +| 8 Technical specifications structure..... | 11 | +| 9 Technical specifications..... | 12 | +| 9.1 122-series: Service aspects ..... | 12 | +| 9.2 123-series: Technical realization ..... | 12 | +| 9.3 124-series: Signalling protocols - user equipment to network ..... | 14 | +| 9.4 126-series: CODECs ..... | 20 | +| 9.5 129-series: Signalling protocols - intra-fixed-network..... | 20 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3642 + +## IMS references to Release 12 for communication between IMS and NGN networks to support end-to-end service interoperability + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation identifies the IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) specifications for the "ETSI Release 12" as the basis for communication between IMS and next generation networks (NGNs) in order to support end-to-end service interoperability. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T H.248.1] Recommendation ITU-T H.248.1 v3 (2013), *Gateway control protocol: Version 3*. +- [ITU-T I.130] Recommendation ITU-T I.130 (1998), *Method for the characterization of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and network capabilities of an ISDN*. +- [ITU-T Q.65] Recommendation ITU-T Q.65 (2000), *The unified functional methodology for the characterization of services and network capabilities including alternative object oriented techniques*. +- [ITU-T Q.761] Recommendation ITU-T Q.761 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part functional description*. +- [ITU-T Q.762] Recommendation ITU-T Q.762 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part general functions of messages and signals*. +- [ITU-T Q.763] Recommendation ITU-T Q.763 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part formats and codes*. +- [ITU-T Q.764] Recommendation ITU-T Q.764 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part signalling procedures*. +- [ITU-T Q.1902.1] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.1 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional description*. +- [ITU-T Q.1902.2] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.2 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No.7 ISDN User Part: General functions of messages and parameters*. +- [ITU-T Q.1902.3] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.3 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No.7 ISDN User Part: Format and codes*. +- [ITU-T Q.1902.4] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.4 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2): Basic call procedures*. + +- [ITU-T Q.1902.5] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.5 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2): Exceptions to the Application transport mechanism in the context of BICC*. +- [ITU-T Q.1902.6] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1902.6 (2001), *Bearer Independent Call Control protocol (Capability Set 2): Generic signalling procedures for the support of the ISDN User Part supplementary services and for bearer redirection*. +- [ITU-T Q.1912.5] Recommendation ITU-T Q.1912.5 (2018), *Interworking between session initiation protocol (SIP) and bearer independent call control protocol or ISDN user part*. +- [ITU-R M.2012] Recommendation ITU-R M.2012 (2018), *Detailed specifications of the terrestrial radio interfaces of International Mobile Telecommunications Advanced (IMT-Advanced)*. +- [ETSI TS 122 001] ETSI TS 122 001 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Principles of circuit telecommunication services supported by a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) (3GPP TS 22.001 version 12.0.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 122 115] ETSI TS 122 115 V12.3.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Service aspects; Charging and billing (3GPP TS 22.115 version 12.3.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 122 173] ETSI TS 122 173 V12.9.0 (2016), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System(UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Core Network Subsystem (IMS) Multimedia Telephony Service and supplementary services; Stage 1 (3GPP TS 22.173 version 12.9.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 123 002] ETSI TS 123 002 V12.7.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Network architecture (3GPP TS 23.002 version 12.7.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 123 153] ETSI TS 123 153 V.12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Out of band transcoder control; Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.153 version 12.0.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 123 167] ETSI TS 123 167 V12.1.0 (2015), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) emergency sessions (3GPP TS 23.167 version 12.1.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 123 203] ETSI TS 123 203 V12.11.0 (2016), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and charging control architecture (3GPP TS 23.203 version 12.11.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 123 205] ETSI TS 123 205 V12.1.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Bearer-independent circuit-switched core network; Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.205 version 12.1.0 Release 12)*. + +- [ETSI TS 123 228] ETSI TS 123 228 V12.10.0 (2016), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.228 version 12.10.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 123 231] ETSI TS 123 231 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); SIP-I based circuit-switched core network; Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.231 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 147] ETSI TS 124 147 V12.7.0 (2017), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Conferencing using the IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 24.147 version 12.7.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 173] ETSI TS 124 173 V12.3.0 (2015), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IMS Multimedia telephony communication service and supplementary services; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 24.173 version 12.3.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 229] ETSI TS 124 229 V12.22.0 (2019), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3 (3GPP TS 24.229 version 12.22.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 604] ETSI TS 124 604 V12.09.0 (2016), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+)(GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Communication Diversion (CDIV) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.604 version 12.09.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 605] ETSI TS 124 605 V12.5.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Conference (CONF) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.605 version 12.5.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 606] ETSI TS 124 606 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Message Waiting Indication (MWI) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.606 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 607] ETSI TS 124 607 V12.2.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Originating Identification Presentation (OIP) and Originating Identification Restriction (OIR) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.607 version 12.2.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 608] ETSI TS 124 608 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Terminating Identification Presentation (TIP) and Terminating Identification Restriction (TIR) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.608 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* + +- [ETSI TS 124 610] ETSI TS 124 610 V12.6.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Communication HOLD (HOLD) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.610 version 12.6.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 611] ETSI TS 124 611 V12.4.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR) and Communication Barring (CB) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.611 version 12.4.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 615] ETSI TS 124 615 V12.3.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Communication Waiting (CW) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 24.615 version 12.3.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 616] ETSI TS 124 616 V12.1.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Malicious Communication Identification (MCID) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.616 version 12.1.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 628] ETSI TS 124 628 V12.4.0 (2016), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Common Basic Communication procedures using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.628 version 12.4.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 629] ETSI TS 124 629 V12.7.0 (2016): *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Explicit Communication Transfer (ECT) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.629 version 12.7.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 642] ETSI TS 124 642 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Completion of Communications to Busy Subscriber (CCBS) and Completion of Communications by No Reply (CCNR) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 24.642 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 124 654] ETSI TS 124 654 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Closed User Group (CUG) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem, Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 24.654 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 126 114] ETSI TS 126 114 V12.16.0 (2017), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Multimedia telephony; Media handling and interaction (3GPP TS 26.114 version 12.16.0 Release 12).* + +- [ETSI TS 129 079] ETSI TS 129 079 V12.3.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Optimal media routing within the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.079 version 12.3.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 162] ETSI TS 129 162 V12.7.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Interworking between the IM CN subsystem and IP networks (3GPP TS 29.162 version 12.7.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 163] ETSI TS 129 163 V12.15.0 (2019), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Interworking between the IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem and Circuit Switched (CS) networks (3GPP TS 29.163 version 12.15.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 165] ETSI TS 129 165 V12.20.0 (2019), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Inter-IMS Network to Network Interface (NNI) (3GPP TS 29.165 version 12.20.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 202] ETSI TS 129 202 V12.0.0 (2014), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Signalling System No. 7 (SS7) signalling transport in core network; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.202 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 204] ETSI TS 129 204 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Signalling System No. 7 (SS7) security gateway; Architecture, functional description and protocol details (3GPP TS 29.204 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 205] ETSI TS 129 205 V12.0.0 (2014), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Application of Q.1900 series to bearer independent Circuit Switched (CS) core network architecture; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.205 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 212] ETSI TS 129 212 V12.13.0 (2016), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and Charging Control (PCC); Reference points (3GPP TS 29.212 version 12.13.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 213] ETSI TS 129 213 V12.14.0 (2019), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and charging control signalling flows and Quality of Service (QoS) parameter mapping (3GPP TS 29.213 version 12.14.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 214] ETSI TS 129 214 V12.12.0 (2016), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and charging control over Rx reference point (3GPP TS 29.214 version 12.12.0 Release 12).* +- [ETSI TS 129 231] ETSI TS 129 231 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Application of SIP-I Protocols to Circuit Switched (CS) core network architecture; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.231 version 12.0.0 Release 12).* + +- [ETSI TS 129 232] ETSI TS 129 232 V12.1.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Media Gateway Controller (MGC) - Media Gateway (MGW) interface; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.232 version 12.1.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 235] ETSI TS 129 235 V12.2.0 (2019), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Interworking between SIP-I based circuit-switched core network and other networks (3GPP TS 29.235 version 12.2.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 238] ETSI TS 129 238 V12.5.0 (2015), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Interconnection Border Control Functions (IBCF) - Transition Gateway (TrGW) interface, Ix interface; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.238 version 12.5.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 272] ETSI TS 129 272 V12.11.0 (2018), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Evolved Packet System (EPS); Mobility Management Entity (MME) and Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) related interfaces based on Diameter protocol (3GPP TS 29.272 version 12.11.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 292] ETSI TS 129 292 V12.7.0 (2018), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Interworking between the IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem (IMS) and MSC Server for IMS Centralized Services (ICS) (3GPP TS 29.292 version 12.7.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 129 658] ETSI TS 129 658 V12.0.0 (2014), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; SIP Transfer of IP Multimedia Service Tariff Information; Protocol specification (3GPP TS 29.658 version 12.0.0 Release 12)*. +- [ETSI TS 181 005] ETSI TS 181 005 V3.3.1 (2009), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Services and Capabilities Requirements*. +- [IETF RFC 791] IETF RFC 791 (1981), *Internet Protocol, DARPA Internet Program, Protocol Specification*. +- [IETF RFC 2460] IETF RFC 2460 (1998), *Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification*. +- [IETF RFC 4566] IETF RFC 4566 (2006) *SDP: Session Description Protocol*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +None + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +3GPP 3rd Generation Partnership Project + +3PTY Three-Party + +| | | +|--------|-------------------------------------------------| +| ACR | Anonymous Communication Rejection | +| AOC | Advice of Charge | +| AS | Application Server | +| ATCF | Access Transfer Control Function | +| B2BUA | Back-to-Back User Agent | +| BFCP | Binary Floor Control Protocol | +| BGCF | Breakout Gateway Control Function | +| BICC | Bearer Independent Call Control | +| CAT | Customized Alerting Tone | +| CB | Communication Barring | +| CCBS | Completion of Communications to Busy Subscriber | +| CCNL | Completion of Communications on Not Logged-in | +| CCNR | Communication Completion on No Reply | +| CDIV | Communication Diversion | +| COLP | Connected Line Identification Presentation | +| COLR | Connected Line Identification Restriction | +| CONF | Conference | +| CRS | Customized Ringing Signal | +| CS | Circuit Switched | +| CSCF | Call Session Control Function | +| CUG | Closed User Group | +| CW | Communication Waiting | +| DRVCC | Dual Radio Voice Call Continuity | +| ECT | Explicit Communication Transfer | +| EIR | Equipment Identity Register | +| FA | Flexible Alerting | +| GPRS | General Packet Radio Services | +| GRUU | Globally Routable User agent URIs | +| HOLD | Communication HOLD | +| HSS | Home Subscriber Server | +| IBCF | Interconnection Border Control Function | +| ICB | Incoming Communication Barring | +| ICID | IMS Charging Identifier | +| ICS | IMS Centralized Services | +| ISUP | ISDN User Part | +| I-CSCF | Interrogating CSCF | +| II-NNI | Inter-IMS Network to Network Interface | + +| | | +|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| IM | Instant Messaging | +| IM CN | IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) | +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| IMS-ALG | IMS Application Level Gateway | +| IOI | Inter-Operator Identifier | +| IP-CAN | IP-Connectivity Access Network | +| IUT | Inter-UE Transfer | +| MBMS | Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service | +| MCID | Malicious Communication Identification | +| MCPTT | Mission Critical Push-To-Talk | +| MGC | Media Gateway Controller | +| MGCF | Media Gateway Control Function | +| MGW | Media Gateway | +| MME | Mobility Management Entity | +| MMTEL | Multimedia Telephony | +| MPS | Multimedia Priority Service | +| MRB | Media Resource Broker | +| MRFC | Media Resource Function Controller | +| MRFP | Multimedia Resource Function Processor | +| MSRP | Message Session Relay Protocol | +| MTSI | Multimedia Telephony Service for IMS | +| MWI | Message Waiting Indication | +| NA(P)T-PT | Network Address (Port-Multiplexing) Translation-Protocol Translation | +| NGN | Next-Generation Network | +| NNI | Network to Network Interface | +| OCB | Outgoing Communication Barring | +| OIP | Originating Identification Presentation | +| OIR | Originating Identification Restriction | +| OMA | Open Mobile Alliance | +| OMR | Optimal Media Routeing | +| P-CSCF | Proxy CSCF | +| PCRF | Policy and Charging Rules Function | +| PLMN | Public Land Mobile Network | +| PNM | Personal Network Management | +| PRES | Presence | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| RTT | Round-Trip Time | + +| | | +|-------|---------------------------------------------| +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SGSN | Serving GPRS Support Node | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | +| SRVCC | Single Radio Voice Call Continuity | +| SS7 | Signalling System no. 7 | +| TIP | Terminating Identification Presentation | +| TIR | Terminating Identification Restriction | +| TrGW | Transition Gateway | +| UE | User Equipment | +| UMTS | Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service | + +# 5 Conventions + +None + +# 6 Introduction + +This Recommendation identifies the IMS specifications for the "ETSI Release 12" as the basis for the communication between IMS and NGNs in order to support end-to-end service interoperability. + +# 7 Overview of the interconnection between two different IM CN subsystems + +Interconnection between two different IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) (IM CN) subsystems shall be guaranteed in order to support end-to-end service interoperability. For this purpose, inter-IMS network to network interface (II-NNI) between two IM CN subsystem networks is adopted, according to the assumptions given in [ETSI TS 123 002] and [ETSI TS 123 228]. + +To support the delivery of IMS services between two separated IM CN subsystems, protocol interconnection has to occur: + +- at a control plane level, in order that IMS procedures can be supported. In this case the adopted reference point is the Ici; and +- at a user plane level, where media streams are exchanged over the Izi reference point. + +IP multimedia sessions are managed by the session initiation protocol (SIP). The transport mechanism for both SIP session signalling and media transport is IPv4 [IETF RFC 791] or IPv6 [IETF RFC 2460]. The ETSI profile of SIP defining the usage of SIP within the IM CN subsystem is specified in [ETSI TS 124 229]. + +The IMS/LTE basic configuration is shown in Figure 7-1, the inter-network interfaces between 3GPP and NGN networks are shown in Figure 7-2, and the general interconnection model is shown in Figure 7-3. + +![Figure 7-1: IMS/LTE basic configuration diagram. This diagram shows the network architecture for IMS over LTE. On the left, three User Equipment (UE) units, each containing an IMS UA, are connected to different radio access networks: GERAN, UTRAN, and LTE-Uu (via an eNodeB). The GERAN and UTRAN units connect to an MSC server (RAN), which in turn connects to an MSC server (VCC) via an ISUP interface. The LTE-Uu UE connects to an eNodeB, which is linked to an S4 SGSN, then to an MME via S1-MME and S1-U interfaces. The MME connects to an S-GW via S11, and the S-GW connects to a P-GW/GGSN via S5. The P-GW/GGSN connects to the IMS core via an SGi interface. The IMS core contains several key components: HSS, P-CSCF (ALG/AGW), I/S-CSCF, MMTel AS, and VCC AS. Various interfaces are shown between these IMS components, including ISUP/SIP, Sh, Mw, Gm, Cx, and ISC. Other interfaces like S6d, S6a, Sv, S3, S12, S4, S11, S5, and S1-U are also depicted. A dashed line labeled Mb separates the radio access and core network from the IMS core. Reference Q.3642(19)_F7-1 is noted in the bottom right.](fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-1: IMS/LTE basic configuration diagram. This diagram shows the network architecture for IMS over LTE. On the left, three User Equipment (UE) units, each containing an IMS UA, are connected to different radio access networks: GERAN, UTRAN, and LTE-Uu (via an eNodeB). The GERAN and UTRAN units connect to an MSC server (RAN), which in turn connects to an MSC server (VCC) via an ISUP interface. The LTE-Uu UE connects to an eNodeB, which is linked to an S4 SGSN, then to an MME via S1-MME and S1-U interfaces. The MME connects to an S-GW via S11, and the S-GW connects to a P-GW/GGSN via S5. The P-GW/GGSN connects to the IMS core via an SGi interface. The IMS core contains several key components: HSS, P-CSCF (ALG/AGW), I/S-CSCF, MMTel AS, and VCC AS. Various interfaces are shown between these IMS components, including ISUP/SIP, Sh, Mw, Gm, Cx, and ISC. Other interfaces like S6d, S6a, Sv, S3, S12, S4, S11, S5, and S1-U are also depicted. A dashed line labeled Mb separates the radio access and core network from the IMS core. Reference Q.3642(19)\_F7-1 is noted in the bottom right. + +Figure 7-1 – IMS/LTE basic configuration + +![Figure 7-2: Inter-network interfaces between 3GPP and NGN networks diagram. This diagram illustrates the interfaces between a 3GPP network and various Next Generation Network (NGN) types. The 3GPP network side includes three main components: CS-IBCF (CS-TrGW), IBCF (TrGW), and S-CSCF (GW). The CS-IBCF connects to a SIP-I network using protocols TS 129.235 (nodes), TS 123.231; TS 129.231 (protocol), and ITU-T Q.1912.5. The IBCF connects to a 3GPP IMS network via an II-NNI/R-NNI interface, using TS 123.228 (architecture) and TS 129.165 (profile). The S-CSCF connects to a SIP network or IMS network without IBCF using TS 129.162. The II-NNI/R-NNI interface is highlighted in a red box. Reference Q.3642(19)_F7-2 is noted in the bottom right.](0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-2: Inter-network interfaces between 3GPP and NGN networks diagram. This diagram illustrates the interfaces between a 3GPP network and various Next Generation Network (NGN) types. The 3GPP network side includes three main components: CS-IBCF (CS-TrGW), IBCF (TrGW), and S-CSCF (GW). The CS-IBCF connects to a SIP-I network using protocols TS 129.235 (nodes), TS 123.231; TS 129.231 (protocol), and ITU-T Q.1912.5. The IBCF connects to a 3GPP IMS network via an II-NNI/R-NNI interface, using TS 123.228 (architecture) and TS 129.165 (profile). The S-CSCF connects to a SIP network or IMS network without IBCF using TS 129.162. The II-NNI/R-NNI interface is highlighted in a red box. Reference Q.3642(19)\_F7-2 is noted in the bottom right. + +Figure 7-2 – Inter-network interfaces between 3GPP and NGN networks + +![Diagram of the Inter-IMS network to network interface between two IM CN subsystem networks. The diagram shows two identical network architectures on either side of a central interface labeled 'II-NNI'. Each network includes an AS (Access System) connected to a TRF (Traffic Router) and TF (Traffic Forwarder), which are connected to an MSC server enhanced for ICS, SRVCC or dual radio. This MSC server is connected to an IBCF (Interconnection Border Control Function) via Mx and Ix interfaces. The IBCF is connected to a TrGW (Traffic Gateway) via an Ix interface. The TrGW is connected to the central II-NNI interface via an Izi interface. The IBCF is also connected to various other components including S-CSCF, I-CSCF, BGCF, ATCF, and P-CSCF via Mx interfaces. The central II-NNI interface is circled in red and labeled 'II-NNI' in red text. A legend at the bottom indicates that dashed lines represent Signalling and solid lines represent Bearer.](8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg) + +Diagram of the Inter-IMS network to network interface between two IM CN subsystem networks. The diagram shows two identical network architectures on either side of a central interface labeled 'II-NNI'. Each network includes an AS (Access System) connected to a TRF (Traffic Router) and TF (Traffic Forwarder), which are connected to an MSC server enhanced for ICS, SRVCC or dual radio. This MSC server is connected to an IBCF (Interconnection Border Control Function) via Mx and Ix interfaces. The IBCF is connected to a TrGW (Traffic Gateway) via an Ix interface. The TrGW is connected to the central II-NNI interface via an Izi interface. The IBCF is also connected to various other components including S-CSCF, I-CSCF, BGCF, ATCF, and P-CSCF via Mx interfaces. The central II-NNI interface is circled in red and labeled 'II-NNI' in red text. A legend at the bottom indicates that dashed lines represent Signalling and solid lines represent Bearer. + +NOTE 1 – The TRF can reside in a standalone entity or can be combined with another functional entity. + +NOTE 2 – This figure is from [ETSI TS 129 165]. + +**Figure 7-3 – Inter-IMS network to network interface between two IM CN subsystem networks** + +# 8 Technical specifications structure + +This clause provides an overview of the IMS specifications for networks. Details for these specifications are found in clause 9. + +The following text describes the numbering scheme for the specifications and reports for the fourth-generation mobile system (4G). + +The following ETSI standards and descriptions are used for guidance only and may be further revised in the future. + +The ETSI standards are: + +- 122-series Service aspects ("Stage 1"); +- 123-series Technical realization ("Stage 2"); +- 124-series Signalling protocols ("Stage 3") – user equipment to network; +- 126-series CODECs; +- 127-series Data; +- 129-series Signalling protocols ("Stage 3") – intra-fixed-network; +- 131-series Subscriber identity module (SIM/USIM), IC cards. Test specifications; +- 132-series Operations, administration, maintenance, and provisioning (OAM&P) and charging; +- 133-series Security aspects; +- 135-series Security algorithms. + +NOTE 1 – Technical specifications in this series are not included in the scope of this Recommendation. They are described in [ITU-R M.2012]. + +NOTE 2 – Technical specifications in these series are not included in the scope of this Recommendation. + +# 9 Technical specifications + +## 9.1 122-series: Service aspects + +### 9.1.1 ETSI TS 122 115: Service aspects; charging and billing + +This document describes the service aspects of charging and billing of 4G. + +This document is not intended to duplicate existing standards or standards being developed by other groups on these topics, and will reference these where appropriate. The document will elaborate on the charging requirements described in the charging principles in [ETSI TS 122 001] service principles. It will allow the generation of accurate charging information to be used in commercial and contractual relationships between the parties concerned. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 122 115 | 12.3.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/122100_122199/122115/12.03.00_60/ts_122115v120300p.pdf | + +## 9.2 123-series: Technical realization + +### 9.2.1 ETSI TS 123 002: Network architecture + +This document offers an overview of the public land mobile network (PLMN) and its architectures and configuration. The configuration and the functional entities of the PLMN and the interfaces between them are described on a general level in order to cope with possible implementations. These descriptions include interfaces between and within the core networks, access networks, user equipment (UE), different service platforms, different domains and subsystems, and functional entities within domains and subsystems. + +This document covers different architectural aspects with varying levels of detail. In general, other specifications shall be referred to for further details; these specifications enable the reader to acquire the full understanding of a system or service feature. + +This document does not cover, or even list, all features of PLMNs. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 002 | 12.7.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123000_123099/123002/12.07.00_60/ts_123002v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.2.2 ETSI TS 123 167: IP multimedia subsystem emergency sessions + +This document defines the stage-2 service description for emergency services in the IP multimedia core network subsystem including the elements necessary to support IP multimedia emergency services. + +[ITU-T I.130] describes a three-stage method for characterisation of telecommunication services, and [ITU-T Q.65] defines stage 2 of the method. + +This document also covers the access network aspects that are crucial for the provisioning of IMS emergency services. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 167 | 12.1.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123100_123199/123167/12.01.00_60/ts_123167v120100p.pdf | + +### 9.2.3 ETSI TS 123 203: Policy and charging control architecture + +This document specifies the overall stage-2 level functionality for policy and charging control that encompasses the following high-level functions for IP-connectivity access networks (IP-CANs) (e.g., general packet radio services (GPRS), industrial wireless local area network (IWLAN), fixed broadband): + +- flow based charging, including charging control and online credit control; +- policy control (e.g., gating control, quality of service (QoS) control). + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 203 | 12.11.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123200_123299/123203/12.11.00_60/ts_123203v121100p.pdf | + +### 9.2.4 ETSI TS 123 228: Interconnection border control function + +An interconnection border control function (IBCF) provides application-specific functions at the SIP/session description protocol (SDP) protocol layer in order to perform interconnection between IM CN subsystem networks by using the Ici reference point. According to [ETSI TS 123 228], IBCF can act both as an entry point and as an exit point for the IM CN subsystem network. + +The functionalities of IBCF are indicated in [ETSI TS 123 228] and specified in [ETSI TS 124 229]. They include: + +- network topology hiding; +- application level gateway (for instance enabling communication between IPv6 and IPv4 SIP applications, or between a SIP application in a private IP address space and a SIP application outside this address space); +- controlling transport plane functions; +- controlling media plane adaptations; +- screening of SIP signalling information; +- selecting the appropriate signalling interconnect; +- generation of charging data records; +- privacy protection; and +- inclusion of a transit inter-operator identifier (IOI) in requests when acting as an entry point for a transit network and in responses when acting as an exit point for a transit network. + +Based on local configuration, the IBCF performs transit routing functions as specified in [ETSI TS 124 229] clause I.2. + +The IBCF acts as a back-to-back user agent (B2BUA) when it performs IMS application level gateway (IMS-ALG) functionality. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|----------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 228 | V12.10.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123200_123299/123228/12.10.00_60/ts_123228v121000p.pdf | + +### 9.2.5 ETSI TS 123 002: Transition gateway + +According to [ETSI TS 123 002], the transition gateway (TrGW) is located at the network borders within the media path and is controlled by an IBCF. Forwarding of media streams between IM CN subsystem networks is applied over the Izi reference point. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 002 | V12.7.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123000_123099/123002/12.07.00_60/ts_123002v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.2.6 ETSI TS 123 153: Transition gateway + +This document specifies the stage 2 description of the out-of-band transcoder control for speech services. It describes the principles and procedures to support transcoder free operation, tandem free operation and the interworking between TrFO and TFO. Transcoder at the edge is also part of this document. The document specifies functions, procedures and information which apply to GERAN Iu mode. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 153 | V12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123100_123199/123153/12.00.00_60/ts_123153v120000p.pdf | + +### 9.2.7 ETSI TS 123 205: Bearer-independent circuit-switched core network + +This document defines the stage 2 description for the bearer independent CS core network. The stage 2 shall cover the information flow between the GMSC server, MSC server and media gateways. Note that nothing in this document shall preclude an implementation of a combined MSC server and MGW. This document shall show the CS core network termination of the Iu interface in order to cover the information flow stimulus to the core network and describe the interaction with the supplementary and value added services and capabilities. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 123 205 | V12.1.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123200_123299/123205/12.01.00_60/ts_123205v120100p.pdf | + +## 9.3 124-series: Signalling protocols - user equipment to network + +### 9.3.1 TS 124 229: IP multimedia call control protocol based on SIP and SDP; Stage 3 + +This document defines a call control protocol for use in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP, and the associated SDP. + +This document is applicable to: + +- the interface between the UE and the call session control function (CSCF); +- the interface between the CSCF and any other CSCF; +- the interface between the CSCF and an application server (AS); +- the interface between the CSCF and the media gateway control function (MGCF); +- the interface between the S-CSCF and the media resource function controller (MRFC); +- the interface between the CSCF and the breakout gateway control function (BGCF); +- the interface between the BGCF and the MGCF; +- the interface between the BGCF and any other BGCF; and +- the interface between the CSCF and an external multimedia IP network. + +Where possible, this document specifies the requirements for this protocol by reference to specifications produced by the IETF within the scope of the SIP and SDP. Where this is not possible, + +extensions to the SIP and SDP are defined within this document. The document has therefore been structured in order to allow both forms of specification. + +As the IM CN subsystem is designed to interwork with different IP-CANs, the IP-CAN independent aspects of the IM CN subsystem are described in the main body and Annex A of this Recommendation. Aspects for connecting a UE to the IM CN subsystem through specific types of IP-CANs are documented separately in the annexes or in separate documents. + +NOTE – This document covers only the usage of the SIP and SDP to communicate with the entities of the IM CN subsystem. It is possible, and not precluded, to use the capabilities of GPRS to allow a terminal containing a SIP UA to communicate with SIP servers or SIP UAs outside the IM CN subsystem, and therefore utilize the services provided by those SIP servers. The usage of the SIP and SDP for communicating with SIP servers or SIP UAs outside the IM CN subsystem is outside the scope of this document. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 229 | 12.22.0 | Published | 2019 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124200_124299/124229/12.22.00_60/ts_124229v122200p.pdf | + +### 9.3.2 ETSI TS 124 608: Terminating identification presentation and terminating identification restriction using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the terminating identification presentation (TIP) and terminating identification restriction (TIR) services, based on stages one and two of the ISDN connected line identification presentation (COLP) and connected line identification restriction (COLR) supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +Service-specific requirements in accordance with [ETSI TS 124 608] shall be supported over the II-NNI. + +The P-Asserted-Identity header field and the Privacy header field with values "id", "user", "none", "header" and "critical" shall be supported at the II-NNI. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 608 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124608/12.00.00_60/ts_124608v120000p.pdf | + +### 9.3.3 ETSI TS 124 607: Originating identification presentation and originating identification restriction using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the TIP and TIR services, based on stages one and two of the ISDN COLP and COLR supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 607 | 12.2.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124607/12.02.00_60/ts_124607v120200p.pdf | + +### **9.3.4 ETSI TS 124 610: Communication HOLD using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the communication hold (HOLD) services, based on stages one and two of the ISDN Hold (HOLD) supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the HOLD supplementary service. + +Service-specific requirements in accordance with [ETSI TS 124 610] shall be supported over the II-NNI. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 610 | 12.6.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124610/12.06.00_60/ts_124610v120600p.pdf | + +### **9.3.5 ETSI TS 124 604: Communication diversion using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the communication diversion (CDIV) supplementary services, based on stages one and two of the ISDN CDIV supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. This document is applicable to the UE and ASs which are intended to support the CDIV supplementary service. + +Service-specific requirements in accordance with [ETSI TS 124 604] shall be supported over the II-NNI. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 604 | 12.09.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124604/12.09.00_60/ts_124604v120900p.pdf | + +### **9.3.6 ETSI TS 124 605: Conference using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the conference (CONF) service based on stages one and two of the ISDN CONF supplementary service. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document specifies centralized conferencing, using a conference focus; distributed conferencing is out of scope. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 605 | 12.5.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124605/12.05.00_60/ts_124605v120500p.pdf | + +### **9.3.7 ETSI TS 124 629: Explicit communication transfer using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the explicit communication transfer (ECT) supplementary service, based on stages one and two of the ISDN ECT supplementary service. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the ECT supplementary service. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 629 | 12.7.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124629/12.07.00_60/ts_124629v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.3.8 ETS TS 124 616: Malicious communication identification using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the malicious communication identification (MCID) service based on stages one and two of ISDN malicious call identification supplementary service. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. The MCID service will store session-related information independent of the service requested. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the MCID supplementary service. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 616 | 12.1.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124616/12.01.00_60/ts_124616v120100p.pdf | + +### 9.3.9 ETSI TS 124 642: Completion of communications to busy subscriber and completion of communications by no reply using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the completion of communications to busy subscriber (CCBS) service, the completion of communications on no reply (CCNR) service and completion of communications on not logged-in (CCNL) service, based on stages one and two of the ISDN supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +The CCBS service enables user A, encountering a busy destination B, to have the communication completed without having to make a new communication attempt when destination B becomes not busy. + +The CCNR supplementary service enables user A, encountering destination B which does not answer the communication (No Reply), to have the communication completed without having to make a new communication attempt when the destination becomes not busy after having initiated an activity. + +The CCNL supplementary service enables user A, encountering destination B which is not registered with the IMS network, to have the communication completed without having to make a new communication attempt when the destination becomes registered. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the CCBS and CCNR supplementary services. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 642 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124642/12.00.00_60/ts_124642v120000p.pdf | + +### **9.3.10 ETSI TS 124 606: Message waiting indication using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the message waiting indication (MWI) service, based on stages one and two of the ISDN MWI supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the MWI supplementary service. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 606 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124606/12.00.00_60/ts_124606v120000p.pdf | + +### **9.3.11 ETSI TS 124 654: Closed user group using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the closed user group (CUG) service, based on stages one and two of the ISDN communication diversion supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the CUG supplementary service. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 654 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124654/12.00.00_60/ts_124654v120000p.pdf | + +### **9.3.12 ETSI TS 124 611: Anonymous communication rejection and communication barring using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Protocol specification** + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the anonymous communication rejection (ACR) and communication barring (CB) supplementary service, based on stages one and two of the ISDN supplementary service anonymous call rejection, incoming communication barring (ICB) and outgoing communication barring (OCB). It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the ACR and CB supplementary services. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 611 | 12.04.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124611/12.04.00_60/ts_124611v120400p.pdf | + +### **9.3.13 ETSI TS 124 147: Conferencing using the IP multimedia core network subsystem; Stage 3** + +This document provides the protocol details for conferencing within the IP multimedia core network subsystem based on the SIP, SIP events, the SDP and the binary floor control protocol (BFCP). + +The functionalities for conference policy control (with respective standardised protocols) are felt to be essential for a complete IMS conferencing service, but are not specified in this version of IMS conferencing and are for further study. + +This document does not cover the signalling between an MRFC and a multimedia resource function processor (MRFP). + +Where possible, this document specifies the requirements for this protocol by reference to specifications produced by the IETF within the scope of the SIP, SIP events, SDP and BFCP, either directly, or as modified by [ETSI TS 124 229]. Where this is not possible, extensions to SIP are defined. This document has therefore been structured to allow both forms of specification. + +The document is applicable to ASs, MRFCs, MRFPs, MGCFs and to the UE providing conferencing capabilities. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 147 | 12.7.0 | Published | 2017 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124100_124199/124147/12.07.00_60/ts_124147v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.3.14 ETSI TS 124 628: Common basic communication procedures using IP multimedia core network (CN) subsystem + +This document describes the stage-3 protocol for basic communication procedures common to several services in the IM CN subsystem when at least one AS is included in the communication. The common procedures are based on stage-3 specifications for supplementary services. + +This document contains examples of signalling flows for the common basic communication procedures. + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the common basic communication procedures. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 628 | 12.4.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124628/12.04.00_60/ts_124628v120400p.pdf | + +### 9.3.15 ETSI TS 124 615: Communication waiting using IP multimedia core network (CN) subsystem + +This document specifies the stage-3 protocol description of the communication waiting (CW) service, based on stage one and stage two of the ISDN call waiting supplementary services. It provides the protocol details in the IM CN subsystem based on the SIP and the SDP. + +The CW service enables a user to be informed that very limited resources are available for an incoming communication. The user then has the choice of accepting, rejecting or ignoring the waiting call (as per basic call procedures). + +This document is applicable to the UE and AS which are intended to support the CW supplementary service. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 615 | 12.3.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124600_124699/124615/12.03.00_60/ts_124615v120300p.pdf | + +### 9.3.16 ETSI TS 124 173: IMS multimedia telephony communication service and supplementary services; Stage 3 + +This document provides the protocol details for multimedia telephony communication service and associated supplementary services in the IM CN subsystem based on the requirements defined in [ETSI TS 124 173]. + +Multimedia telephony and supplementary services allow users to establish communications between them and enrich that by enabling supplementary services. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 124 173 | 12.3.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/124100_124199/124173/12.03.00_60/ts_124173v120300p.pdf | + +## 9.4 126-series: CODECs + +### 9.4.1 ETSI TS 126 114: IP multimedia subsystem; Multimedia telephony; Media handling and interaction + +This document specifies a client for the multimedia telephony service for IMS (MTSI) supporting conversational speech (including DTMF), video and text transported over RTP with the scope to deliver a user experience equivalent to or better than that of circuit-switched (CS) conversational services using the same amount of network resources. It defines media handling (e.g., signalling, transport, jitter buffer management, packet-loss handling, adaptation), as well as interactivity (e.g., adding or dropping media during a call). The focus is to ensure a reliable and interoperable service with a predictable media quality, while allowing for flexibility in the service offerings. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 126 114 | 12.16.0 | Published | 2017 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/126100_126199/126114/12.16.00_60/ts_126114v121600p.pdf | + +## 9.5 129-series: Signalling protocols - intra-fixed-network + +### 9.5.1 ETSI TS 129 162: Interworking between the IM CN subsystem and IP networks + +The IM CN subsystem interworks with the external IP networks through the Mb reference point. + +This document details the interworking between the IM CN subsystem and external IP networks for IM service support. It addresses the issues of control plane interworking, user plane interworking and IP version interworking. + +The IP version interworking, between IPv4 [IETF RFC 791] "*Internet Protocol*", and IPv6 [IETF RFC 2460] "*Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification*" is detailed in terms of the processes and protocol mappings required to support both mobile originated and terminated calls. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 162 | 12.7.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129100_129199/129162/12.07.00_60/ts_129162v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.5.2 ETSI TS 129 163: Interworking between the IP multimedia core network subsystem and circuit-switched networks + +This document specifies the principles of interworking between the ETSI IM CN subsystem and bearer independent call control (BICC)/ISDN user part (ISUP) based legacy circuit-switched (CS) networks, in order to support IM basic voice calls. + +This document addresses the areas of control and user plane interworking between the IM CN subsystem and CS networks through the network functions, which include the MGCF and IM-MGW. For the specification of control plane interworking, areas such as the interworking between the SIP and BICC or ISUP are detailed in terms of the processes and protocol mappings required for the support of both IM originated and terminated voice calls. + +Other areas addressed encompass the transport protocol and signalling issues for negotiation and mapping of bearer capabilities and QoS information. + +This document specifies the interworking between the 3GPP profile of the SIP (as detailed according to [ETSI TS 124 229]) and BICC or ISUP, as specified in [ITU-T Q.1902.1] to [ITU-T Q.1902.6]: "Bearer Independent Call Control" and [ITU-T Q.761] to [ITU-T Q.764]: "Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part", respectively. + +This document addresses two interworking scenarios with respect to the properties of the CS network: + +- 1) the CS network does not use any ETSI-specific additions; +- 2) the CS network uses ETSI-specific additions. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 163 | 12.15.0 | Published | 2019 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129_100_129199/129163/12.15.00_60/ts_129163v121500p.pdf | + +### 9.5.3 ETSI TS 129 165: Inter-IMS network to network interface + +This document addresses the II-NNI consisting of Iei and Izi reference points between IMS networks in order to support end-to-end service interoperability. + +This document addresses the issues related to control plane signalling (ETSI usage of SIP and SDP protocols, required SIP headers), as well as other interconnecting aspects like security, numbering/naming/addressing and user plane issues as transport protocol, media and codecs covered in a widespread set of ETSI specifications. A profiling of the II-NNI is also provided. + +Charging aspects will be addressed as far as SIP signalling is concerned. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 165 | 12.20.0 | Published | 2019 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129_100_129199/129165/12.20.00_60/ts_129165v122000p.pdf | + +### 9.5.4 ETSI TS 129 202: Signalling system No. 7 signalling transport in core network; Stage 3 + +This document defines the possible protocol architectures for transport of signalling system no. 7 (SS7) signalling protocols in a core network. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 202 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129_200_129299/129202/12.00.00_60/ts_129202v120000p.pdf | + +### 9.5.5 ETSI TS 129 204: Signalling system No. 7 security gateway; Architecture, functional description and protocol details + +This document provides functional description of the SS7 security gateway. This document also covers network architecture, routeing considerations and protocol details. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 204 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129_200_129299/129204/12.00.00_60/ts_129204v120000p.pdf | + +### 9.5.6 ETSI TS 129 212: Policy and charging control; Reference points + +This document provides the stage-3 specification of the Gx, Gxx and Sd reference points for the present release. The functional requirements and the stage-2 specifications of the Gx, Gxx and + +Sd reference points are contained in [ETSI TS 123 203]. The Gx reference point lies between the policy and charging rule function and the policy and charging enforcement function. The Gxx reference point lies between the policy and charging rule function and the bearer binding and event reporting function. The Sd reference point lies between the policy and charging rule function and the traffic detection function. + +Whenever it is possible, this document specifies the requirements for the protocol by reference to specifications produced by the IETF within the scope of Diameter. Where this is not possible, extensions to Diameter are defined. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 212 | 12.13.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129212/12.13.00_60/ts_129212v121300p.pdf | + +### 9.5.7 ETSI TS 129 213: Policy and charging control signalling flows and QoS parameter mapping + +This specification adds detailed flows of policy and charging control (PCC) over the Rx and Gx reference points and their relationship with the bearer level signalling flows over the Gn interface. + +The calls flows depicted in this specification represent usual cases, i.e., not all situations are covered. Detailed information provided in [ETSI TS 129 212] and [ETSI TS 129 214] shall be taken into consideration. + +This specification also describes the binding and the mapping of QoS parameters among SDP, universal mobile telecommunications service (UMTS) QoS parameters, and QoS authorization parameters. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 213 | 12.14.0 | Published | 2019 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129213/12.14.00_60/ts_129213v121400p.pdf | + +### 9.5.8 ETSI TS 129 214: Policy and charging control over Rx reference point + +This document provides the stage-3 specification of the Rx reference point for the present release. The functional requirements and the stage-2 specifications of the Rx reference point are contained in [ETSI TS 23 203]. The Rx reference point lies between the application function and the policy and charging rule function. + +Whenever it is possible, this document specifies the requirements for the protocol by reference to specifications produced by the IETF within the scope of Diameter. Where this is not possible, extensions to Diameter are defined. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 214 | 12.12.0 | Published | 2016 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129214/12.12.00_60/ts_129214v121200p.pdf | + +### 9.5.9 ETSI TS 129 231: Application of SIP-I protocols to circuit-switched core network architecture; Stage 3 + +This document describes the protocols to be used when SIP-I is optionally used as a call control protocol in an ETSI CS core network on Nc interface, see [ETSI TS 123 231]. The SIP-I protocol operates between (G)MSC servers. The SIP-I architecture consists of a number of protocols. The following types of protocols are described: call control protocol, resource control protocols and user + +plane protocol for this architecture. The architecture complies with the requirements imposed by [ETSI TS 123 231] and [ETSI TS 123 153]. + +Interworking of SIP-I on Nc to external networks is described by [ETSI TS 129 235]. + +This document is valid for a third-generation PLMN (UMTS) complying with Release 9 and later. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 231 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129231/12.00.00_60/ts_129231v120000p.pdf | + +### 9.5.10 ETSI TS 129 232: Media gateway controller – Media gateway interface; Stage 3 + +This document describes the protocol to be used on the media gateway controller (MGC) – Media gateway (MGW) interface. The media gateway controllers covered in this specification are the MSC server and the GMSC server. The basis for this protocol is the [ITU-T H.248.1] MEGACO protocol as specified in ITU-T and IETF. The BICC architecture, as described in [ETSI TS 123 205] and [ETSI TS 129 205], defines the usage of this protocol. + +This specification describes the changes to [ITU-T H.248.1]/MEGACO which are needed to handle 3G-specific traffic cases. This is done by using the [ITU-T H.248.1]/MEGACO standard extension mechanism. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 232 | 12.1.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129232/12.01.00_60/ts_129232v120100p.pdf | + +### 9.5.11 ETSI TS 129 235: Interworking between SIP-I based circuit-switched core network and other networks + +This document specifies the interworking between a SIP-I based CS core network, as specified in [ETSI TS 123 231] and [ETSI TS 129 231], with out-of-band transcoder control-related procedures in [ETSI TS 123 153], and: + +- an external SIP-I based signalling network compliant to [ITU-T Q.1912.5]; +- an ISUP ([ITU-T Q.761] to [ITU-T Q.764]) based network such as an ISUP based ETSI CS domain or an PSTN; +- a BICC ([ITU-T Q.1902.1] to [ITU-T Q.1902.6]) based network such as an BICC-based ETSI CS domain as specified in [ETSI TS 123 205] and [ETSI TS 129 205]; +- an Internet multimedia subsystem, as specified in [ETSI TS 123 228] and [ETSI TS 124 229]. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 235 | 12.2.0 | Published | 2019 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129235/12.02.00_60/ts_129235v120200p.pdf | + +### 9.5.12 ETSI TS 129 238: Interconnection border control functions – Transition gateway interface, Ix interface; Stage 3 + +This document describes the protocol to be used on the IBCF – transition gateway (TrGW) interface and the CS-IBCF – CS-TrGW interface. The basis for this protocol is the [ITU-T H.248.1] protocol. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 238 | 12.5.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129238/12.05.00_60/ts_129238v120500p.pdf | + +### 9.5.13 ETSI TS 129 272: Evolved packet system; Mobility management entity and serving GPRS support node related interfaces based on Diameter protocol + +This document describes the mobility management entity (MME) and serving GPRS support node (SGSN) related diameter-based interfaces towards the home subscriber server (HSS), and the MME and the SGSN related diameter-based interface towards the equipment identity register (EIR). + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 272 | 12.11.0 | Published | 2018 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129272/12.11.00_60/ts_129272v121100p.pdf | + +### 9.5.14 ETSI TS 129 292: Interworking between the IP multimedia core network subsystem and MSC server for IMS centralized services + +This document specifies the principles of interworking between the IM CN subsystem and CS domain in order to enable ICS for UEs using CS domain access. + +This document addresses the area of registration procedures interworking between the CS domain and IM CN subsystem. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 292 | 12.7.0 | Published | 2018 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129292/12.07.00_60/ts_129292v120700p.pdf | + +### 9.5.15 ETSI TS 129 079: Optimal media routeing within the IP multimedia subsystem; Stage 3 + +This document defines optional optimal media routeing (OMR) procedures that can be applied by entities in the IMS that control media resources and are capable of manipulating the SDP as defined by [IETF RFC 4566]. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 079 | 12.3.0 | Published | 2015 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129000_129099/129079/12.03.00_60/ts_129079v120300p.pdf | + +### 9.5.16 ETSI TS 129 658: SIP transfer of IP multimedia service tariff information; Protocol specification + +This document specifies stage three of the real-time transfer of tariff information between a charge determination point (CDP) and a charge generation point (CGP) by means of the SIP. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|--------------|---------|-----------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 658 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129600_129699/129658/12.00.00_60/ts_129658v120000p.pdf | + +### **9.5.17 ETSI TS 129 205: Application of Q.1900 series to bearer independent Circuit Switched (CS) core network architecture** + +This document describes the protocols to be used when [ITU-T Q.1902] "Bearer Independent Call Control" is used as call control protocol in a 3GPP Bearer Independent CS core network 3GPP TS 23.205. Recommendations [ITU-T Q.1902.1], [ITU-T Q.1902.2], [ITU-T Q.1902.3], [ITU-T Q.1902.4], [ITU-T Q.1902.5] and [ITU-T Q.1902.6] operate between (G) MSC servers. The BICC architecture as described in [ITU-T Q.1902] consists of a number of protocols. The following types of protocols are described: call control protocol, bearer control protocols and a resource control protocol for this architecture. + +| | Document No. | Version | Status | Issued date | Location | +|------|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETSI | TS 129 205 | 12.0.0 | Published | 2014 | https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129200_129299/129205/12.00.00_60/ts_129205v120000p.pdf | + + + + + +# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd7c24e83d75a6b1baa7fb4210f76345166390c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5866ab521163bd4f911ae6e27d0a1cf1f491c665e9b87b7d7076098a143f4bff +size 3944 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66f8698a7a4a20511270dee645de37f51327c89a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7bad802b6d3c9e53319b5f59a1274c9801623f46e7e9e55adc4ad288c2497168 +size 106703 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a234352dfaccdc24745c88eef7724cc6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a234352dfaccdc24745c88eef7724cc6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ab9f8013282ba9546966c49de268622096fde0b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a234352dfaccdc24745c88eef7724cc6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1634d9d7eaf8f2ae511ea9ec64a5ef4c70c29517d3fa0d578d01b38413d40e9d +size 119715 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a734898ce18e972938949637c32a34f4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a734898ce18e972938949637c32a34f4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7447b195dc23494d8685314d7a6a63f7ab96d898 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/a734898ce18e972938949637c32a34f4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3b8c034e84ce423d973963c81bd7c4f8c7680d6e8798bd4f43d1e827633da6cd +size 115172 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b4f232a76a45100f1c8c9f9b10b528c06cd854c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b89cc6351705b54d2ee5fbd1fe303d03bc778840eef17a56f1ae399143245a7d +size 44094 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c1656502f4c9f386ca503087129846ab98cf4d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3745-202004-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,603 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.3745** + +(04/2020) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for SDN – Network +signalling and signalling requirements for services + +--- + +**Protocol for time constraint Internet of things- +based applications over software-defined +networking** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.3745 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| Resource control protocols | Q.3710-Q.3739 | +| Network signalling and signalling requirements for services | Q.3740-Q.3779 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3745 + +## Protocol for time constraint Internet of things-based applications over software-defined networking + +## Summary + +Traffic generated by smart devices is becoming a significant part of the Internet. Smart devices require mobility and guaranteed quality of service (QoS) that needs to be managed. Potentially, software-defined networking- (SDN-) and network function virtualization- (NFV-) based technologies (IMT-2020) will be used for managing all types of services and therefore, SDN is to be tasked to manage these kinds of demands as well. + +A significant number of the available Internet services require the exact value of network parameters such as latency, jitter, round trip time (RTT) and bandwidth. Using SDN capabilities for managing network parameters, will give a possibility to implement new services such as a tactile Internet, augmented reality, e-health applications. + +In this regard, the protocol is proposed to ensure the transfer of the network performance requirements requested by an IoT server for IoT applications in SDN- and NFV-based networks in International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020). This protocol is to be used for interconnection between the IoT server and the orchestrator application layer (management application (MA)). + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.3745 | 2020-04-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/14244 | + +## Keywords + +IoT, NFV, SDN. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2020 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 3 | +| 6 Overview ..... | 3 | +| 7 The high-level architecture and general descriptions of elements interaction ..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Functions of entities ..... | 5 | +| 7.2 Interconnection framework ..... | 6 | +| 8 Protocol format ..... | 7 | +| 8.1 Interconnection between IoT device and IoT server ..... | 8 | +| 8.2 Interconnection between IoT server and management application ..... | 8 | +| Appendix I – Use cases..... | 13 | +| Bibliography..... | 15 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.3745 + +## Protocol for time constraint Internet of things-based applications over software-defined networking + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the protocol for providing network performance requirements requested by an IoT server for IoT applications in software-defined networking- (SDN-) and network function virtualization- (NFV-) based networks in International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020). This protocol defines a set of application-level interface conventions between the IoT server and the orchestrator application layer (management application (MA)). High-level architecture, functions and message formats are addressed in this Recommendation. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-R M.2083-0] Recommendation ITU-R M.2083-0 (2015), *IMT Vision – Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following term defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 application** [b-ITU-T Y.2091]: A structured set of capabilities, which provide value-added functionality supported by one or more services, which may be supported by an API interface. + +**3.1.2 device** [b-ITU-T Y.2060]: With regard to the Internet of things, this a piece of equipment with the mandatory capabilities of communication and the optional capabilities of sensing, actuation, data capture, data storage and data processing. + +**3.1.3 future network (FN)** [b-ITU-T Y.3001]: A network able to provide services, capabilities, and facilities difficult to provide using existing network technologies. A future network is either: + +- a) a new component network or an enhanced version of an existing one, or +- b) a heterogeneous collection of new component networks or of new and existing component networks that is operated as a single network. + +**3.1.4 gateway** [b-ITU-T Y.4101]: A unit in the Internet of things which interconnects the devices with the communication networks. It performs the necessary translation between the protocols used in the communication networks and those used by devices. + +**3.1.5 Internet of things (IoT)** [b-ITU-T Y.2060]: A global infrastructure for the information society, enabling advanced services by interconnecting (physical and virtual) things based on existing and evolving interoperable information and communication technologies. + +**3.1.6 software-defined networking** [b-ITU-T Y.3300]: A set of technologies that enables to directly program, orchestrate, control and manage network resources, which facilitates the design, delivery and operation of network services in a dynamic and scalable manner. + +**3.1.7 thing** [b-ITU-T Y.2060]: With regard to the Internet of things, this is an object of the physical world (physical things) or the information world (virtual thing), which is capable of being identified and integrated into communication networks. + +## **3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation** + +None. + +# **4 Abbreviations and acronyms** + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|----------|----------------------------------------------| +| AAA | Authentication, Authorization, Accounting | +| API | Application Programming Interface | +| BLS | Battery Level Status | +| BSS | Business Support System | +| b2b | business to business | +| CoAP | Constrained Application Protocol | +| DPI | Deep Packet Inspection | +| e2e | end to end | +| FN | Future Network | +| HTTP | Hypertext Transfer Protocol | +| IMS | Internet protocol Multimedia Subsystem | +| IMT-2020 | International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 | +| IoT | Internet of Things | +| JSON | JavaScript Object Notation | +| LAN | Local Area Network | +| MA | Management Application | +| MQTT | Message Queue Telemetry Transport | +| NFV | Network Function Virtualization | +| NGN | Next Generation Network | +| OSS | Operation Support System | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| REST | Representational State Transfer | +| RTT | Round Trip Time | +| SDN | Software-Defined Networking | +| VM | Virtual Machine | +| WAN | Wide Area Network | + +# 5 Conventions + +None. + +# 6 Overview + +The IoT, according to clause 3.1.5, is a global infrastructure that consists of different technologies and solutions. New IoT-based services, which are coming to existing networks and FNs, bring new requirements from and opportunities for infrastructure. One type of IoT-based services is time constraint applications, which are sensitive to delay and jitter parameters. FNs should be based on SDN and NFV technologies to meet new network infrastructure requirements. + +In this regard, a new protocol for realization time constraint IoT-based applications over SDN is proposed. The protocol ensures conventions and message formats for transfer of network performance requirements requested by an IoT server for IoT applications to the orchestrator application layer. + +# 7 The high-level architecture and general descriptions of elements interaction + +FNs, according to clause 3.1.3, are those able to provide different kinds of service that are difficult to supply using existing network technologies. One of the limiting factors is the quality of service (QoS) required for new services. However, the heterogeneity in basic telecommunication FN elements should not affect QoS. Responsibility for ensuring the required QoS falls on the infrastructure of the IMT-2020 networks, which according to [ITU-R M.2083-0], should be based on SDN and NFV, which in turn help to ensure high-level network scaling and flexibility in management, allowing delivery of new services. + +As such, the use of SDN and NFV allows for the dynamic management of connections following the "on-demand" model. This Recommendation presents a protocol for providing network performance requirements requested for IoT applications, taking into account NFV and SDN architecture. Figure 1 shows infrastructure based on SDN/NFV concepts, taking into consideration various access technologies and possible integration with multi-service next generation network/Internet protocol multimedia subsystem (NGN/IMS) networks. + +![Figure 1: Infrastructure of a telecommunication network with QoS management system. The diagram illustrates a multi-layered architecture. At the top, 'Network services' include Management application, Monitoring systems, Information systems, Cellular information systems, and OSS/BSS. Below this is the 'Orchestration layer' containing an 'Orchestrator'. The 'Core layer' consists of three parallel paths: 1) Control plane with SDN controller, Physical data plane, and NFV (Hypervisor); 2) Aggregation layer with Control plane, SDN controller, and Data plane; 3) Access layer with Control plane, SDN controller, and Data plane. These layers are interconnected by 'API interface' labels. To the right, 'Network operator A' provides various access technologies: Cellular network - NB-IoT, LPWAN network, CPE (LAN), and GW Heterogeneous. These connect to an 'IoT platform' which in turn connects to 'IoT devices', 'VANET/MANET' (ZigBee, 6LoWAN), and 'NGN/IMS'. On the far right, 'Network operator B' provides 'Management application' and 'Network services' which interact with the main system. The entire diagram is enclosed in a dashed red border. A label 'Q.3745(20)_F01' is at the bottom right.](a234352dfaccdc24745c88eef7724cc6_img.jpg) + +Figure 1: Infrastructure of a telecommunication network with QoS management system. The diagram illustrates a multi-layered architecture. At the top, 'Network services' include Management application, Monitoring systems, Information systems, Cellular information systems, and OSS/BSS. Below this is the 'Orchestration layer' containing an 'Orchestrator'. The 'Core layer' consists of three parallel paths: 1) Control plane with SDN controller, Physical data plane, and NFV (Hypervisor); 2) Aggregation layer with Control plane, SDN controller, and Data plane; 3) Access layer with Control plane, SDN controller, and Data plane. These layers are interconnected by 'API interface' labels. To the right, 'Network operator A' provides various access technologies: Cellular network - NB-IoT, LPWAN network, CPE (LAN), and GW Heterogeneous. These connect to an 'IoT platform' which in turn connects to 'IoT devices', 'VANET/MANET' (ZigBee, 6LoWAN), and 'NGN/IMS'. On the far right, 'Network operator B' provides 'Management application' and 'Network services' which interact with the main system. The entire diagram is enclosed in a dashed red border. A label 'Q.3745(20)\_F01' is at the bottom right. + +Figure 1 – Infrastructure of a telecommunication network with QoS management system + +Figure 1 presents a telecommunication network logically broken down into several segments: access layer; aggregation layer; network core layer; and operator service layer. Such a breakdown is common for most operators (e.g., telecommunication networks on the territory of the Russian Federation). Each segment (access, aggregation and core) is controlled by an SDN controller. It is also possible to have virtual segments on networks, each of which may perform one or more network functions. To ensure interaction between the segments, a network orchestrator is required that will in turn, via the southern interface, manage the controllers and interact with the hypervisors of the network's virtual segments and also directly with virtual machines (VMs) performing one network function or another. The red dotted line in Figure 1 represents the interaction between basic elements of the system ensuring QoS. The system includes the basic elements 1) to 3). + +- 1) MA. The task of this element is to support the protocol for providing network performance requirements requested, including the processing of requests for the provision of QoS from service users, interaction with the network orchestrator and networks of third-party operators to ensure end-to-end (e2e) QoS. +- 2) IoT device. A user device comprising a hardware and software system offering the support of application protocols for the request of necessary QoS and IoT server parameters. +- 3) IoT server. Software or hardware and software system(s) provide(s) an implementation of application protocols for interaction with the MA to request the necessary QoS level for the network segment between IoT server and device, for the provision of services in IMT-2020 networks. + +Figure 2 presents the direct interaction between elements 1) to 3) in this framework. + +![Figure 2: Interaction of elements in ensuring QoS in IMT-2020 networks. The diagram shows two carrier networks, Carrier network #1 and Carrier network #2. Carrier network #1 contains IoT devices, an IoT server, SDN controllers and NFV hypervisors, a Network orchestrator, and a Management application. Carrier network #2 contains a Management application. Arrows show interactions: IoT devices to IoT server, IoT server to SDN controllers, SDN controllers to Network orchestrator, Network orchestrator to Management application, and Management application to IoT server. A red dotted line connects the Management application in Carrier network #1 to the Management application in Carrier network #2.](e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction of elements in ensuring QoS in IMT-2020 networks across two carrier networks, Carrier network #1 and Carrier network #2. + +- Carrier network #1:** + - Contains **IoT devices** (represented by smartphone icons) and an **IoT server** (represented by a server icon). + - The **IoT devices** send data to the **IoT server**. + - The **IoT server** sends data to **SDN controllers and NFV hypervisors** (represented by a cloud icon). + - The **SDN controllers and NFV hypervisors** send data to the **Network orchestrator** (represented by a blue box). + - The **Network orchestrator** sends data to the **Management application** (represented by a green box). + - The **Management application** sends data to the **IoT server**. +- Carrier network #2:** + - Contains a **Management application** (represented by a green box). +- A red dotted line connects the **Management application** in Carrier network #1 to the **Management application** in Carrier network #2. + +Q.3745(20)\_F02 + +Figure 2: Interaction of elements in ensuring QoS in IMT-2020 networks. The diagram shows two carrier networks, Carrier network #1 and Carrier network #2. Carrier network #1 contains IoT devices, an IoT server, SDN controllers and NFV hypervisors, a Network orchestrator, and a Management application. Carrier network #2 contains a Management application. Arrows show interactions: IoT devices to IoT server, IoT server to SDN controllers, SDN controllers to Network orchestrator, Network orchestrator to Management application, and Management application to IoT server. A red dotted line connects the Management application in Carrier network #1 to the Management application in Carrier network #2. + +**Figure 2 – Interaction of elements in ensuring QoS in IMT-2020 networks** + +Interaction occurs between the following elements of the framework: + +- Internet thing and IoT server (the server on which the thing is registered); +- IoT server and MA – interaction occurs along a protected telecommunication channel to ensure security; + +- IoT server and other IoT server (if it is necessary to ensure the connection between devices, which are registered on different servers); +- MA for the orchestrator of one network with that of another network operator. + +The organization of the MA element, working with the orchestrator via an application programming interface (API), helps to ensure the transparent performance of services throughout the operator-supervised network (in the case of one orchestrator). The operator's other information systems are at this level, including those performing operation support system /business support system (OSS/BSS) functionality, monitoring, data analysis, etc., enabling this functionality to be easily integrated during framework implementation. + +## 7.1 Functions of entities + +### 7.1.1 Functions of IoT server + +An IoT server is a server that can be represented in software or hardware-software form. The IoT server implements the following main functions. + +- Interaction with IoT device. The interaction utilizes one of the IoT protocols (e.g., hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) 2.0, constrained application protocol (CoAP) and message queue telemetry transport (MQTT)). +- Implementation of authentication, authorization, accounting (AAA) functionality for registered IoT devices. +- Interaction with the MA. Interaction with another IoT server. These interactions require communication between IoT devices, with the participation of IoT server(s). + +### 7.1.2 Functions of management application + +An MA is a server that can be represented in both software and hardware-software form. + +The main functions of an MA follow. + +- Checking the ability to interact with the IoT server. The service operator to ensure the quality of the services provided, concludes an agreement with the network operator; as a result, the network operator enters the IP addresses of the service operator into the registry. This registry is used by the network operator when checking at the stage of a request for interaction from the IoT server(s). Also at this stage, the number of services provided by the network operator to the service operator (e.g., restrictions of network performance parameters) is determined. +- Interaction with the IoT server. This interaction occurs through the MA API using a specific application-level protocol. The software interface implements a set of functions, the reachability of some of which is determined by the initially established ability to interact with the IoT server during the initial verification process. The main functions are: accepting service requests for a specific device or group of devices from the IoT server, as well as signalling with the IoT server in the process of maintaining the IoT device(s) and providing the appropriate quality. +- Interaction with the network orchestrator. This interaction occurs via the orchestrator API. + +An MA-MA interaction is possible if it is necessary to establish a connection either with an IoT server located on a network controlled by another orchestrator (the same or another network operator, e.g., international roaming), or when establishing an IoT device – IoT device connection, given the fact that one of the devices is in the network, controlled by another orchestrator. + +NOTE – If an IoT device identifier has a unified identification system, it is also possible to provide lifelong Internet access for a device that generates telemetry traffic, and this device is automatically linked to a specific IoT server. Payment for communication is part of the cost of the device, and the calculation is made for the period of the lifecycle of each device. At the same time, the interaction between different operators is governed by the terms of the contract. + +## 7.2 Interconnection framework + +### 7.2.1 Main framework interconnection diagram + +The interaction between framework elements (network devices) is shown in Figure 3. + +![Sequence diagram showing interactions between IoT device, Management application, Orchestrator, and IoT server for ensuring e2e QoS.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between four entities: IoT device, Management application, Orchestrator, and IoT server. The sequence of interactions is as follows: + +- Identification:** A bidirectional interaction between the IoT device and the IoT server. +- IoT group options:** A bidirectional interaction between the Management application and the IoT server. +- Configure VM for IoT group:** A message from the Management application to the Orchestrator. +- Create VM space:** A message from the Orchestrator to the Management application. +- b2b connections:** A bidirectional interaction between the Management application and the Orchestrator, represented by dashed boxes. +- Set framework:** A message from the Management application to the Orchestrator. +- b2b connections:** Another bidirectional interaction between the Management application and the Orchestrator, represented by dashed boxes. +- Set type, IoT method identification:** A message from the Management application to the Orchestrator. +- Set network options:** A bidirectional interaction between the Management application and the Orchestrator. +- Configure SDN:** A message from the Orchestrator to the Management application. +- Set options for monitoring systems, OSS/BSS, cellular information systems, b2b:** A bidirectional interaction between the Management application and the Orchestrator, represented by dashed boxes. +- Start on-demand session:** A message from the IoT device to the Management application, represented by a dashed box. + +Sequence diagram showing interactions between IoT device, Management application, Orchestrator, and IoT server for ensuring e2e QoS. + +Q.3745(20)\_F03 + +**Figure 3 – Diagram of interaction in ensuring e2e QoS in IMT-2020 networks** + +Figure 3 addresses the logic of the interaction of elements in ensuring a given level of QoS in IMT-2020 networks. + +A description of interactions reflected in Figure 3 follows. + +- 1) **Identification process.** The process involves a set of actions aimed at fulfilling AAA. This process occurs only between the IoT device (virtual or physical) and a third-party IoT server. Authentication involves the allocation of the computing resources of the server in accordance with information previously entered into the database, helping to match the device to a specific user, with the IoT device undergoing the authentication procedure using its own unique identifier. The authorization process helps to determine the number of services + +available to the Internet thing or object in question. It is also worth remembering that in certain cases, the thing can perform a set of functions that share commonalities in their tasks for the type of thing in question. For example, a thing might be a tactile Internet device and also perform one or more medical functions. Given the variety in types of Internet things, it is possible to separate (classify) them into groups. In the accounting process, the computing resources allocated to the Internet thing are accounted for on the IoT server. In addition, any process failures are logged, and, in certain cases, billing procedures are carried out on the part of the service operator (owner of the IoT server). It is worth noting that this process might involve other functions, but in each case, the set of functions is determined by the service provider (owner of the IoT server). + +- 2) IoT group options. Options include the IoT server's formation and subsequent transmission of parameters of an IoT group or adding an Internet thing with data at the required QoS to this group, data transfer protocol used (MQTT, CoAP, etc.), security level (determining whether further encryption of communication channel is required) of the network segment concerned. +- 3) Configure VM for IoT group. Upon completion of the operations above, a request is made to the network orchestrator in accordance with data obtained in the IoT group options process, after which the orchestrator configures the VM space for a specific group of IoT devices or adds or removes specific devices to or from the group. +- 4) Create VM space. Virtual space is created for a group of IoT devices according to specific service criteria (various IoT service operators, QoS, financial regulation or billing, deep packet inspection (DPI) requirements, etc.) or addition of new registered IoT devices to an existing group. +- 5) Set framework procedure. This procedure involves the entry and configuration of QoS parameters for the IoT group. At this stage, it is possible that there are further processes (set type, IoT method identification) that are essential for inter-operator connections. +- 6) Set options for monitoring systems, OSS/BSS, cellular information systems, business to business (b2b). Where necessary, these processes are aimed at integration with monitoring, OSS/BSS and other systems required for the operator's provision of services to the client. Figure 3 also shows a return link between processes, which implies the complete monitoring of the provision of services and information gathering on information systems not only of the operator, but also the IoT server. In the event of an anomaly, whereby the network, as a system, is lacking in resources and will not be able to provide the required QoS, the system will be obliged to interrupt the provision of services, based on priorities, type of IoT application and the agreement between the network operator and service operator (owner of IoT server), as well as informing the server of the error code. The return link to the IoT server helps with not only the mutual analysis and information gathering of systems, but also the outlook for increasing the number of Internet objects in each of the sectors and their type, which, as a result, will help to optimize planning of communication networks, IoT service operators, etc. + +# 8 Protocol format + +This clause defines the data requirements that are transferred between functional elements at various stages of interaction, displayed in clauses 7.1 and 7.2, including the format of the transmitted messages between the functional elements of the IoT server and MA. + +This clause displays the requirements for the parameters to be transmitted and the message format. + +## 8.1 Interconnection between IoT device and IoT server + +The purpose and description of the interaction processes at this stage are given in clause 7.2.1. At the moment, there are a large number of open and commercial server solutions (also known as clouds or platforms) for building and providing IoT services. At the same time, most (especially commercial) solutions have their own peculiarities in the implementation of IoT device – IoT server interaction processes, namely, the choice of interaction protocols, architecture and the underlying software principles. Concurrently, it is also worth considering several IoT technologies, where a different protocol stack is used (e.g., sensor networks), which are connected via a gateway. Thus, taking into account the multi-vendor requirements, the differences in the stacks of protocols at this stage of interaction determine the number of parameters that must be transferred from the IoT device (or gateway) to the IoT server. The functions of the IoT server element are defined in clause 7.1.1. + +Parameters include: + +- identifier of things; +- type of device: + - a) physical (code in the message – "001"), + - b) virtual (code in the message – "010"), + - c) gateway (code in the message – "011"); +- QoS requirements: + - a) minimum number of hops, + - b) range of round trip time (RTT), + - c) maximum lost packets; +- battery level status (BLS); +- requirements for additional connection encryption. + +## 8.2 Interconnection between IoT server and management application + +The purpose and description of the interaction processes at this stage are given in clause 7.2.1. At this stage, there is an interaction between the IoT server elements and the MA. The functions of the MA element are specified in clause 7.1.2. At the moment, the northbound interface of SDN controllers, orchestrators is based on the representational state transfer (REST) architecture of distributed element interaction. The message format, in this case, is the structure of the transmitted data, defined in JavaScript object notation (JSON) format. + +The interaction should include the following types of requests: + +- up message – this type of message is generated from the IoT server to MA; +- way down message – this type of message is generated from the MA to the IoT server. +- equal message – this type of message can be generated by both elements (MA, IoT server). + +The types of messages (according to actions) are: + +- create (create a new group of things; also used on first connection) – refers to an up message; +- update (intended for modification parameters about iot devices) – refers to an up message; +- delete (delete IoT device from the group or delete group) – refers to an up message; +- status (update information about the actual group's data) – refers to an "equal message". + +### 8.2.1 Format of messages + +Each format contains a part of data expansion. Extensions in the message are for developers. + +#### Message No. 1. Create a group + +``` +{ + "request_type" : "up_message", + "action" : "create" + "groups" : { + { "id_group" : '...', + "group-name" : "", + "group": [ + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + ] + }, + { "id_group" : "...", + "group-name" : "", + "group": [ + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + } + ] + } + } +} +``` + +``` + + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + ] + } +}, +"vendor_extend" : {..} +} + +``` + +#### **Message No. 2. Delete group** + +``` + +{ + "request_type" : "up_message", + "action" : "delete" + "groups" : { + { "id_group" : '...', + "group-name" : "" + }, + { "id_group" : '...', + "group-name" : "" + } + } + "vendor_extend" : {..} +} + +``` + +#### **Message No. 3. Update group** + +``` + +{ + "request_type" : "up_message", + "action" : "update" + "groups" : { + { "id_group" : '...', + "group-name" : "", + "group": [ + +``` + +``` + + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + ] + }, + { "id_group" : "...", + "group-name" : "", + "group": [ + { + "IoT-device_id": "..", + "service_provided": "..", + "Type_of_device": "..", + "qos_range_min_rtt": "..", + "qos_range_max_rtt": "..", + "max-lost-packets": "..", + "battery-level-status": "..", + "additional-encryption": ".." + }, + ] + } + }, + +``` + +``` + "vendor_extend" : {..} +} +``` + +#### **Message 4. Status** + +``` +{ + "request_type" : "equal_message", + "action" : "status" + "src_of_request" : "..." + "dst_of_request" : "..." + "vendor_extend" : {..} +} +``` + +# Appendix I + +## Use cases + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +A new protocol for providing necessary network performance requirements for time constraint IoT-based applications over SDN is addressed in this Recommendation. The protocol ensures conventions and message formats for transfer of network performance requirements requested by an IoT server for IoT applications to the orchestrator application layer. The protocol is implemented between an IoT server and orchestrator and can be used in the following cases. + +- Wide area network (WAN). Interconnection between the operator's network infrastructure (management layer) and that of third parties, which are IoT server providers. +- Local area network (LAN). Interconnection between the management layer of network infrastructure (orchestrator application layer) and a local IoT server, which is the platform for local time constraint IoT-based applications (e.g., LAN of a medical organization). + +The use case in Figure I.1 presents a LAN with the implemented protocol for procuring the necessary network performance requirements for IoT (healthcare) applications. In this case, the LAN is based on SDN technologies. + +![Diagram of a hospital LAN based on SDN/NFV showing various IoT devices and services connected to SDN switches and controllers.](a734898ce18e972938949637c32a34f4_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a hospital LAN architecture based on SDN/NFV. At the top, a 'Management application' is connected to a 'Service plane' (yellow cloud). Below it, the 'Control plane' (pink cloud) contains an 'SDN controller' and a 'Network orchestrator'. The 'LAN of hospital based on SDN/NFV' (blue cloud) includes two 'SDN-switch' units. On the left, a 'Video-server (security service)' and a 'Video-camera security service' are connected to an SDN-switch. This switch is also connected to a 'Gateway of body area sensor network (IoT-device)' via a 'WiFi zone' and 'WiFi 802.11ac'. On the right, another SDN-switch is connected to a 'Monitoring system (IoT-device)' and a 'Device for remote monitoring' (represented by a doctor icon) via 'WiFi 802.11ac'. A 'WiFi 802.11ac' router is also connected to this SDN-switch. The 'IoT-server' is connected to the 'Network orchestrator' in the control plane. The diagram is labeled 'Q.3745(20)\_FI.1' at the bottom right. + +Diagram of a hospital LAN based on SDN/NFV showing various IoT devices and services connected to SDN switches and controllers. + +Figure I.1 –Use case of protocol implementation in a hospital local area network + +In Figure I.1 the following connections are presented: + +- solid line – wire connections; +- dotted lines – logical control connections, e.g., between SDN controller and SDN switches. + +The protocol proposed in this Recommendation is to be used for interconnection between the IoT server and the orchestrator application layer (MA). According to the use case presented, the protocol provides the opportunity to set special settings for network control with necessary network performance requirements for IoT healthcare applications. + +For example, there are two types of service presented in Figure I.1: video streaming (security service); and monitoring of patient health (body area sensor network with gateway and hospital bed monitoring system). In this case, the protocol requires network performance characteristics for operation data transfer to the doctor's remote devices through an IoT server. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T Y.2060] Recommendation ITU-T Y.4000/Y.2060 (2012), *Overview of the Internet of things*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.2091] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2091 (2011), *Terms and definitions for next generation networks*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.3001] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3001 (2011), *Future networks: Objectives and design goals*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.3300] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3300 (2014), *Framework of software-defined networking*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.4101] Recommendation ITU-T Y.4101/Y.2067 (2017), *Common requirements and capabilities of a gateway for Internet of things applications*. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..863f8138ef09bae90828d6fd85eaafe179ebef70 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:107fce3c174eeec0785f5d1d434e863e19e21a373dee97dcdf7c7ce7714a5dde +size 73936 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b310ac210c3a7914165adf06403f98576a85c994 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3912-201208-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0953d8a48897d2f76d40d07a4f72e9fd2630b3ba8f1e39b9ba5bc493583058ef +size 3635 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3913-201408-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3913-201408-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..529e4f72f14cdf7f41f56cfbfb26655bf8181c59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3913-201408-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abb9e3ec6dfc8364cedc39a68cf796e9d3ff5529c79a1811eedeb12c6d6e7583 +size 3787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34d40300a44bcbb81a7f576a37fcf03bcf27baeb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9ab04582eac3885b9f6e70ef0650fccb58adef2f1420f602db23d783d402adfb +size 16723 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0def7f61dff4cf2245382941146ed60fe80b8108 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:643e7a79cd471de79b419ca3ecfffd1a7a7ef19dc1c24371cba9fe01a2d2248f +size 12368 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/66c2bf11a8f117cddf67eff92d4c736c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/66c2bf11a8f117cddf67eff92d4c736c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93de5300236351f48d5d5eec319cf805ef91a248 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/66c2bf11a8f117cddf67eff92d4c736c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:743e3a5ef351d4d7907fa168d94355eb36922dc194e22fcc8b2b1a8e08cfe07b +size 33900 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abda52cbb1047d6649f89e40c898a1c33bed7267 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6f3b7e07231c0f3e116c99c493bdda98ecd52313b6735faa6cea23815cf3162b +size 7190 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa3a0cc3f756f65da201c54c0c1cdcb427f76e0c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:11283081f8e3c2c883a0cb0e5c4fecd9837400580af3d4c312de7375cc13fbbe +size 23954 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cd670657688f47ccbaf8e1b141d1403ce127f35 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3919-202601-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4c43d3be6cd06336601bc821f67fea19005e5eac9f9256fdffa139c1d233e2dd +size 32160 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3931.1-201103-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3931.1-201103-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b310ac210c3a7914165adf06403f98576a85c994 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3931.1-201103-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0953d8a48897d2f76d40d07a4f72e9fd2630b3ba8f1e39b9ba5bc493583058ef +size 3635 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/01832e59ebad7ada5e790de6f90cc9b6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/01832e59ebad7ada5e790de6f90cc9b6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff89ff216decbee0264aaf423f70f98e53763a28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/01832e59ebad7ada5e790de6f90cc9b6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3f8dda016db8958970b2ef33aefa02ad8fffee35f02ccf01d3837c32d0cf0f30 +size 18468 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b88f4b19590d1edfb1d0d2a254bbd1b5fec6ad08 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5aadec5fc8070c8306b1acac543520df94a6146651041feda9098d80e159c1a7 +size 79941 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..763148479b7835907a1c5ed3849fa3e0e5cdda21 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fa8d1d104eb8fa3ba31adce01b088bf23feea49eab4e01fd24be057f7e7b8091 +size 75530 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/187bba66c887c745c512add37a577c5e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/187bba66c887c745c512add37a577c5e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3f903ea75b3ebdbf1b0f7b3c823cc56e824ee92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/187bba66c887c745c512add37a577c5e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:708e34d83af2d6dde2dcf142058eda8c1b91fb719106a515198d52bc7a1886e8 +size 56446 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d171ec34eb8f5e79995be5bce5a235704ad0248 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/1ab49904e6a60be337d5b75cb7cc8ab7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dab7043458f866a3d15ab07a59c29f93709c2c31c4cae2b47ef7cb765126ae3b +size 64731 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/255efa1d461fc79b4ed367aaec11637f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/255efa1d461fc79b4ed367aaec11637f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..40afac85c6e6b34fff2f8f542fe8cd99912b97c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/255efa1d461fc79b4ed367aaec11637f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:54d9c97a27abc416a7f57a773628bed96faa1f84b09bbfb72d705d036ecb5e99 +size 52674 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecbbea939f574ca3c13245a4247a9ad54560205d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:88e26e8d5f54e1d095bcc8628852e6d6f7972d6a0e977aaa0a5a921f4d5afe4c +size 61394 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d6f4802cca8ceb5b91287a6e655d9dfa55db142 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a73880b4ff0f208a60175524e8269da1d7e9252b99251890037ad1770bf34be3 +size 59752 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ff47750e49dba21a531fcf603f8fc8f6852e0e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9630fdd66a5562ad760775b4f973ad0e842e07e930c7931703e475ff82a1e51c +size 47630 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/3c99312f83459559d9a301148555d7b9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/3c99312f83459559d9a301148555d7b9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43035e87a07458931590ba7f3f5ad2ca7dde00ce --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/3c99312f83459559d9a301148555d7b9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:edabd0018bb9055517fe0cdf5f6f1ed6dad264f6e4e16d3e9247170c7c6da352 +size 48752 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d302237cf8e8d3fb998190b59f8d412db17e4176 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/552265bdbcf6d43d341fd018a9076269_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d1329d093b536c3b2baa2e65999cc6bb3ae7200c27d67e1465b491c226752852 +size 64775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc04bce7ad451155a63b6328c208c354653e9cfe --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e46d29ea41a9faf4b457f9547764649a95ad01b24c9cfdd96ae96cd4b7976140 +size 27891 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9dd1554e11838cd2e03d3d9334caa8b14782ebe7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b170ad29704b2c54fdede6cf8523ba1a6e6e33d636483cf8138d500f90d91ee4 +size 59373 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9354b59422f1f65de724940c0b5d2e39b9288d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:995ec46dae3e38079c20bd225a6197e2a3a126d6067fcc9e20a6ec6db7d1c2d0 +size 65125 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3de35c4dde378a2fa4f4f9746d0a3460aa8c72a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c1749ca62d15e19fd06c2330a762a39ca9ca2e9e328d9d56a49724ab2c4367cd +size 77445 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4b6fed42435fd24bd8d21559fa96c9ab175f4f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:07d5dbefb90efe714003ee23320d327610f1e17776ad23cb51ea6e5ceef7621e +size 59621 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df32dfe6296e4be080d862c19bc57a8226fa9080 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:759bfdb9e55c0d13dfa1cc17e4e62de777fca68d1defa5a6beb669dc81370c4e +size 52099 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/812b773680b611c18d49243e102b895a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/812b773680b611c18d49243e102b895a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fef131f75bf54223646c565980aebfc98f7f85b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/812b773680b611c18d49243e102b895a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c3f3778171c2a60e42ea74a849b3b01d95b24475c0128c4d4c3b8bd73a8238e3 +size 155232 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f3cec6fba88e9cfc0e9c76a98bc06e2f1f0e1c8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a13275f3a985b6508cd16f31f5b33ad0727dbcc718b946186f531264e1785f42 +size 114740 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d44774a862ee3274083f3c90007c05d1521e5f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5aae5b33974ef9328e3eee4a554b2a7295b5245a5ab8b50f27481630ef55ffc1 +size 78286 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc3ce7fce28747270dcd8eedfb52e893545a126d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74f2f6d61bdde690c5f73e4e9b6101b8ff4511e4528f1657cdc69170ab4e539d +size 73000 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..98efe754164cc25b49581684dace1821a131819f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cb066674c275115100c4afcbc65b07a136d7093f73b2a1c12b23a67dc2d1eb1f +size 47287 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..529e4f72f14cdf7f41f56cfbfb26655bf8181c59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abb9e3ec6dfc8364cedc39a68cf796e9d3ff5529c79a1811eedeb12c6d6e7583 +size 3787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a780a960b3f2de2493d5785bedae10ff_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a780a960b3f2de2493d5785bedae10ff_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4c01918086d1b3efb1738dfd0b51191363e2e39 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a780a960b3f2de2493d5785bedae10ff_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9799e89f9f487edf70e472f683ab0815d827a06dddfe272fb01b4b186782e58d +size 50983 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a97518a839da75f8379c578562b01bc2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a97518a839da75f8379c578562b01bc2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00cfb03d07f13594e5880ca8a443bb490fb43cc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/a97518a839da75f8379c578562b01bc2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9dc04325853129e0be28c50dac998c40c7ff602f65e854cb51e30eb14080c928 +size 60790 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24d1c73e77643e7eb0a2aea2adfae9fd18c041b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:194b1ec792192edef7c7a2b162c9a0ab2cb18844394eb4f6f4ab2655cd37fab4 +size 48766 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c1278da91cbcabe32628e589ebc47418_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c1278da91cbcabe32628e589ebc47418_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..582de0338e52414a9a8fff95579459cb44e9880d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c1278da91cbcabe32628e589ebc47418_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:392604b9bfbe616bf2ebac926e5405d69e389dc978859ba41d85f178e293c7c2 +size 61445 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..501c62359c5c7c5a5b76cf5eed83afa0debd682e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f6bf1c644d119909c549185545df7d24dd6f22a155677ec6d3dc0f72caf611ec +size 70309 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3588c564392481064b780f445437fef12df389fd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d8f7c44e17ad6b7a25681bade24ecd61769db66d48111501f4e84ac547be492c +size 103896 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cac61a60141d0335b4ae7a081f6b18d4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cac61a60141d0335b4ae7a081f6b18d4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf2c040a53d8e29456e7d8840d7d16e3407b0e14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cac61a60141d0335b4ae7a081f6b18d4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d09ebc87c2498ade0708384e7bd24ede6ef33f4dec69a94a52f5ec62d149ac3e +size 75188 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de130bba052b369cb60b8df0f576b5b878e8fcdd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:027b67623d80bf3532c40c5d06c81a4e8f2fa5edfa4285b925e8766338c16a30 +size 51680 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ccdeaf31dbe65613f2f87a7b2b06e391_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ccdeaf31dbe65613f2f87a7b2b06e391_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7fbe52da6273932eff25e63c49a4a0ec93943d6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ccdeaf31dbe65613f2f87a7b2b06e391_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7172bf914589e964abcc7b519a08d6aaa69685a8956d5a20bfe824deb57f1b75 +size 28318 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90d4a10930c169f90820783ae5e5eab7402bca7d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:353f9674575fdec9bba2fd0dcdb4a1a1ba18cea9d7d35bf7d5fc245110d09278 +size 19623 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e97cbe9e2cd63cfa384cc3198430b868b5e2f86 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a41230d5e2e9b07af36784d459dad95b142c4b2c54de83cbf0cb3167f39d1606 +size 82074 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/df6b7ae63e53e5f93dbd0a70acdae4a6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/df6b7ae63e53e5f93dbd0a70acdae4a6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d04d3d179f0c8e1b1feac50f6569379bcf3729d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/df6b7ae63e53e5f93dbd0a70acdae4a6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eef16ac0e85b1c03b794a9a9f14bf7be18f46cee8a99c32ece79cb4e0415faa8 +size 18434 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/f73a962fa02b43355e0523718c4ddbee_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/f73a962fa02b43355e0523718c4ddbee_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..005bc84c7465912ccaf96d5fedf4d775ed12183d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/f73a962fa02b43355e0523718c4ddbee_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:32a34213660cfd51ba38b1c482e74603430fcd9623a1cd869667fb7831d65732 +size 44257 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2241bebc00ca17fb51b0e8a7d4053ec032b2497f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3933-201506-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d3a7053c2c9a6e08f46e8c5fa40e6fccb820e05d4117b1f4f95da5e3385ac6e9 +size 40245 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3941.1-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3941.1-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1f1f9edef7d49d8f8da79d403e846af56bc572f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.3941.1-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d2cc36350a3b92a16836c1fd6b2acbc4816360e453ed42c8c4a31448d4bdd7a3 +size 3958 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1f1f9edef7d49d8f8da79d403e846af56bc572f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d2cc36350a3b92a16836c1fd6b2acbc4816360e453ed42c8c4a31448d4bdd7a3 +size 3958 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/68ca7669d38a3c31f5a2c3a06fa802e3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/68ca7669d38a3c31f5a2c3a06fa802e3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..919039d620f6fff60a2e141ca357193d7038dd23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4002.3-201602-I_PDF-E/68ca7669d38a3c31f5a2c3a06fa802e3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf01eda2d8da0f151b57a6d6e416bc50690bc6e05b67ff6f8bcb72612c2de29e +size 15874 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..529e4f72f14cdf7f41f56cfbfb26655bf8181c59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abb9e3ec6dfc8364cedc39a68cf796e9d3ff5529c79a1811eedeb12c6d6e7583 +size 3787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b2bf7c004941f2941d05d8a03ecd17520ff2ee9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:844a4f9ba85fe0e31c5a9643248b20600986407e9222b131205a4309f8177372 +size 18561 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28e85931b9b069ee22bea37027a9d1d2b4bf1222 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4006.2-201602-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:142f61772badf03899a1df0846225282384e59af5760bb6aa9d3a2fa07ab0119 +size 20875 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd85c5f0cf29767d5fce2cdb865aece52387c01d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:09082581f21d9548df66739aba3c0950a4cd19b319365b8f1c69a3129a386b3c +size 4070 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e1233a07027f853fb8c1a3cf174e46bb832193e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f273162cb24c66f445604ef508d8ee042fb72154c0b132af997d599057e91ac1 +size 20178 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db41ac079c7f54dee877a3696c6802cf37680100 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4007.2-201608-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d6589f6341f65e44f36ff71ea17b90afbf7d1215fd6b5f0cbf22c55d450a0192 +size 17961 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9597a453b0aeb3550caf877fd1b05602a1b2bb6d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fe8585455d19e3fc6f33c4ab640edfd2a06cc312ebdab32b5986c076fb77a7c9 +size 14673 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22dc7ff0fb30f976cc1e576c45d2b7e65fa5ddc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa14933e776f7d0be8b2d60b81cbb6c1ee49deb5080e0281da05296f48189055 +size 6859 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f57164bb9339c75b3b717318f629fa15ceef2289 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4008.3-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,350 @@ + + +International Telecommunication Union + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.4008.3** + +(08/2016) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Testing specifications – Testing specifications for SIP-IMS + +--- + +**Malicious communication identification using +IP multimedia core network subsystem; +Conformance test specification – Part 3: Test +suite structure and test purposes; User side** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.3 + +ITU-T + +![ITU logo](1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a red lightning bolt striking across it. To the right of the globe, the text "International Telecommunication Union" is written in blue, with "ITU" in a larger, bold font above it. + +ITU logo + +International +Telecommunication +Union + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| Testing specifications for next generation networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | +| Testing specifications for SIP-IMS | Q.4000–Q.4039 | +| Testing specifications for Cloud computing | Q.4040–Q.4059 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.3 + +# Malicious communication identification using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Conformance test specification – Part 3: Test suite structure and test purposes; User side + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.3 v.1 (2016) provides the test suite structure and test purposes for the malicious communication identification (MCID) using IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem conformance test specification for the user side (based on Recommendation ITU-T Q.3624 v.1). + +The version number, v.1, indicates that this is version one of Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.3, and that it relates to Release 10 of the relevant 3GPP/ETSI standard. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|--------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4008.3 v.1 | 2016-08-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/12998 | + +## Keywords + +IMS, IP multimedia subsystem, malicious communication identification, MCID, testing, test suite structure and test purposes, TSS&TP. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2016 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 1 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Test Suite Structure (TSS)..... | 2 | +| 6.1 Configuration..... | 2 | +| 7 Test Purposes (TP)..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Introduction ..... | 3 | +| 7.2 TPs for Malicious Communication Identification (MCID)..... | 3 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.3 + +# Malicious communication identification using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Conformance test specification – Part 3: Test suite structure and test purposes; User side + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation is part 3 of a multi-part deliverable covering malicious communication identification (MCID) using IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem; conformance test specification, as identified below: + +Part 1: "Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS)"; + +Part 2: "Test suite structure and test purposes (TSS&TP); Network side"; + +**Part 3: "Test suite structure and test purposes (TSS&TP); User side".** + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] Recommendation ITU-T Q.3624 v.1 (2016), *Malicious communication identification using IP multimedia core network subsystem – Protocol specification*. + +[ITU-T Q.4008.1] Recommendation ITU-T Q.4008.1 (2016), *Malicious communication identification using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Conformance test specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation conformance statement*. + +## 3 Definitions + +### 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the terms and definitions given in [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] and the following apply: + +**3.1.1 communication information:** Information collected and registered by the MCID service. + +**3.1.2 identity information:** Includes all the information identifying a user, including trusted (network generated) and/or untrusted (user generated) identities. + +### 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +CN Core Network + +| | | +|------|-----------------------------------------------| +| IM | IP Multimedia | +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| MCID | Malicious Communication Identification | +| MIME | Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions | +| PICS | Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | +| TP | Test Purpose | +| TSS | Test Suite Structure | +| UE | User Equipment | +| XML | extensible Markup Language | + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Test suite structure + +**Table 6-1 – Test suite structure** + +| | | | | +|------|----------------|--|--------------| +| MCID | | | | +| | destination_UE | | MCID_U01_xxx | + +### 6.1 Configuration + +The scope of this Recommendation is to test the signalling and procedural aspects of the stage 3 requirements as described in [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1]. Stage 3 describes the requirements for several network entities and terminal devices. Consequently, several interfaces (reference points) are addressed to satisfy the test of the different entities. + +In order to test the appropriate entities the configurations below are applicable. + +#### 6.1.1 Testing of the user equipment + +There are special clauses in the protocol standard describing the procedures that apply at the originating and terminating user equipment (UE) as shown in the test configuration in Figure 6.1.1-1. + +![Diagram showing a Test system connected to User equipment via a Gm interface. The User equipment block contains 'Implementation under test'.](1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + TS[Test system] ---|Gm| UE[User equipment] + subgraph UE + IUT[Implementation under test] + end + +``` + +Q.4008.3v1(16)\_F6.1.1-1 + +Diagram showing a Test system connected to User equipment via a Gm interface. The User equipment block contains 'Implementation under test'. + +**Figure 6.1.1-1 – Applicable configuration to test UE functionalities** + +## 7 Test purpose + +### 7.1 Introduction + +For each test requirement a test purpose (TP) is defined. + +#### 7.1.1 TP naming convention + +Test purposes (TPs) are numbered, starting at 001, within each group. Groups are organized according to the test suite structure (TSS). Additional references are added to identify the actual test suite and whether it applies to the network or the user (see Table 7.1.1-1). + +**Table 7.1.1-1 – TP identifier naming convention scheme** + +| | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| Identifier: <ss>_<iut><group>_<nnn> | | | +| | = supplementary service: | e.g., "MCID" | +| | = type of IUT: | U            User equipment
N            Network entity | +| | = group | 2 digit field representing group reference according to TSS | +| | = sequential number | (001-999) | + +#### 7.1.2 Test strategy + +As the base standard [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] contains no explicit requirements for testing. The TPs were generated as a result of an analysis of the base standard and the protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) specification [ITU-T Q.4008.1 v.1]. The criteria applied include the following: + +- Whether or not a test case can be built from the TP is not considered. + +### 7.2 TPs for malicious communication identification + +#### 7.2.1 Actions at the destination UE + +| TSS | TP | MCID reference | Selection expression | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--|--------|-------------------------|---|------------|--|---|-------------|--|---|---------------|--|--|-----|---|---|---------------------------|--|--|---------------|--|---|-----|---|--------------------------------|--|--| +| MCID/destination_UE | MCID_U01_001 | Clause 4.5.2.12 of [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] | PICS 4.5.1/1 AND PICS 4.6.1/1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Test purpose
The UE sends a MCID request in the confirmed state
Ensure that the UE is able to invoke MCID in the confirmed state. The UE sends a Re-INVITE without session modification and no 'mcid' XML element is present. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Preconditions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SIP header values:
Re-INVITE without session modification | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Comments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Test equipment
INVITE User equipment
100 Trying
180 Ringing
200 OK INVITE
ACK
Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE
ACK
Apply post test routine
| | | | | INVITE | → User equipment | ← | 100 Trying | | ← | 180 Ringing | | ← | 200 OK INVITE | | | ACK | → | ← | Re-INVITE requesting MCID | | | 200 OK INVITE | | ← | ACK | ← | Apply post test routine | | | +| | INVITE | → User equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | 100 Trying | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | 180 Ringing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | 200 OK INVITE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | ACK | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | Re-INVITE requesting MCID | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | 200 OK INVITE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | ACK | ← | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Apply post test routine | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +| TSS | TP | MCID reference | Selection expression | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------| +| MCID/destination_UE | MCID_U01_002 | Clause 4.5.2.12 of [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] | PICS 4.5.1/1 AND PICS 4.6.1/1 | | | | +| Test purpose
The UE sends a MCID request in the early dialogue
Ensure that the UE is able to invoke MCID in the early dialogue. The UE sends a Re-INVITE without session modification and no 'mcid' XML element is present. | | | | | | | +| Preconditions: | | | | | | | +| SIP header values:
Re-INVITE without session modification | | | | | | | +| Comments: | | | | | | | +|
Test equipment INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing

← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK ←
Apply post test routine
User equipment
| | | | Test equipment | INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing

← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK ←
Apply post test routine | User equipment | +| Test equipment | INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing

← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK ←
Apply post test routine | User equipment | | | | | + +| TSS | TP | MCID reference | Selection expression | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------| +| MCID/destination_UE | MCID_U01_003 | Clause 4.5.2.12 of [ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] | PICS 4.5.1/1 AND PICS 4.6.1/2 | | | | +| Test purpose
The UE sends a MCID request using the XML McidRequestIndicator in the confirmed state
Ensure that the UE is able to invoke MCID in the confirmed state. The UE sends a Re-INVITE without session modification. Ensure that the UE is able to send a 'mcid' XML MIME body with the McidRequestIndicator set to 1. | | | | | | | +| Preconditions: | | | | | | | +| SIP header values:
Re-INVITE without session modification
XML mcid
request
McidRequestIndicator = '1' | | | | | | | +| Comments: | | | | | | | +|
Test equipment INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing
← 200 OK INVITE
ACK →
← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK →
Apply post test routine
User equipment
| | | | Test equipment | INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing
← 200 OK INVITE
ACK →
← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK →
Apply post test routine | User equipment | +| Test equipment | INVITE →
← 100 Trying
← 180 Ringing
← 200 OK INVITE
ACK →
← Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE →
← ACK →
Apply post test routine | User equipment | | | | | + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--|-----------------------|--|--------|---|---|------------|--|---|-------------|--|---|---------------------------|--|--|---------------|---|---|-----|--|--|--------------------------------|--| +| TSS
MCID/destination_UE | TP
MCID_U01_004 | MCID reference
Clause 4.5.2.12 of
[ITU-T Q.3624 v.1] | Selection expression
PICS 4.5.1/1 AND
PICS 4.6.1/2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Test purpose
The UE sends a MCID request using the XML McidRequestIndicator in the early dialogue
Ensure that the UE is able to invoke MCID in the early dialogue. The UE sends a Re-INVITE without session modification.
Ensure that the UE is able to send a 'mcid' XML MIME body with the McidRequestIndicator set to 1. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Preconditions:
SIP header values:
Re-INVITE without session modification
XML mcid
request
McidRequestIndicator = '1' | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Comments:
Test equipment User equipment
INVITE
100 Trying
180 Ringing
Re-INVITE requesting MCID
200 OK INVITE
ACK
Apply post test routine
| | | | Test equipment | | User equipment | | INVITE | → | ← | 100 Trying | | ← | 180 Ringing | | ← | Re-INVITE requesting MCID | | | 200 OK INVITE | → | ← | ACK | | | Apply post test routine | | +| Test equipment | | User equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | INVITE | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | 100 Trying | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | 180 Ringing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | Re-INVITE requesting MCID | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | 200 OK INVITE | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| ← | ACK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | Apply post test routine | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + + + + + +## **SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS** + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4213af1a950d2b2707516943274495097a0cd0d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e7afb9c723449e1ab7bd1456ffecc239b1cd67291d8558720be182eda1d017db +size 4092 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b13a64dfff3077c3a89f8a1c1824b547c5a531b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4012.1-201608-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.4012.1** + +(08/2016) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Testing specifications – Testing specifications for SIP-IMS + +--- + +**Anonymous communication rejection and +communication barring using IP multimedia +core network subsystem; Conformance testing +specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation +conformance statement** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4012.1 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| Testing specifications for next generation networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | +| Testing specifications for SIP-IMS | Q.4000–Q.4039 | +| Testing specifications for Cloud computing | Q.4040–Q.4059 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4012.1 + +### **Anonymous communication rejection and communication barring using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Conformance testing specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation conformance statement** + +### Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4012.1 v.1 (2016) specifies the testing requirements for supplementary service "Anonymous communication rejection (ACR) and communication barring (CB) using IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem; Conformance testing specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS)". + +The version number, v.1, indicates that this is version one of Recommendation ITU-T Q.4012.1 and that it relates to Release 10 of the relevant 3GPP/ETSI standard. + +This Recommendation endorses ETSI TS 186 017-1 V5.1.1 (2012-09); "IMS Network Testing (INT); Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR) and Communication Barring (CB) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Conformance Testing Specification; Part 1: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS)". + +### History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|--------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4012.1 v.1 | 2016-08-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/13007 | + +### Keywords + +IMS, IP multimedia subsystem, interworking, session description protocol, SDP, session initiation protocol, SIP, testing. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2016 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4012.1 + +### Anonymous communication rejection and communication barring using IP multimedia core network subsystem; Conformance testing specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation conformance statement + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the testing requirements for supplementary service "Anonymous communication rejection (ACR) and communication barring (CB) using IP multimedia (IM) core network (CN) subsystem; Conformance testing specification – Part 1: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS)". + +This Recommendation endorses [ETSI TS 186 017-1 V5.1.1] (2012-09), "IMS Network Testing (INT); Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR) and Communication Barring (CB) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Conformance Testing Specification; Part 1: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS)". + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ETSI TS 186 017-1 V5.1.1] [ETSI TS 186 017-1 V5.1.1] (2012-09), *IMS Network Testing (INT); Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR) and Communication Barring (CB) using IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem; Conformance Testing Specification; Part 1: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS)*. + +## 3 Definitions + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|-----------------------------------------------| +| ACR | Anonymous Communication Rejection | +| CB | Communication Barring | +| CN | Core Network | +| IMS | IP Multimedia Subsystem | +| INT | IMS Network Testing | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| PICS | Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | + +## **5 Conventions** + +None. + +## **6 Endorsement** + +[ETSI TS 186 017-1 V5.1.1] + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..529e4f72f14cdf7f41f56cfbfb26655bf8181c59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abb9e3ec6dfc8364cedc39a68cf796e9d3ff5529c79a1811eedeb12c6d6e7583 +size 3787 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc6cb9d885d832a461ee9bdc2d21c1ff0d6a35e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4041.1-201801-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1212 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.4041.1** + +(01/2018) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Testing specifications – Testing specifications for Cloud +computing + +--- + +**Cloud computing infrastructure capabilities +interoperability testing – part 1: Interoperability +testing between the CSC and CSP** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4041.1 + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| Testing specifications for next generation networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | +| Testing specifications for SIP-IMS | Q.4000–Q.4039 | +| Testing specifications for Cloud computing | Q.4040–Q.4059 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4041.1 + +# Cloud computing infrastructure capabilities interoperability testing – part 1: Interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4041.1 specifies the cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP, including interoperability testing of computing services, storage services, network services and related management functions, based on the functional requirements specified in Recommendation ITU-T Y.3513. The test cases of cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP have also been introduced. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4041.1 | 2018-01-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/13492 | + +## Keywords + +Cloud computing, infrastructure capabilities, interoperability testing. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2018 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | | Page | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 | Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 3.1 | Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 2 | +| 3.2 | Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 | Conventions ..... | 3 | +| 6 | Overview of cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 3 | +| 7 | Computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 4 | +| 7.1 | Interoperability testing of VM configuration between the CSC and CSP..... | 4 | +| 7.2 | Interoperability testing of VM migration between the CSC and CSP..... | 4 | +| 7.3 | Interoperability testing of VM snapshot between the CSC and CSP ..... | 4 | +| 7.4 | Interoperability testing of VM clone between the CSC and CSP ..... | 4 | +| 7.5 | Interoperability testing of VM time synchronization between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.6 | Interoperability testing of VM reservation between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.7 | Interoperability testing of VM image between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.8 | Interoperability testing of VM template between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.9 | Interoperability testing of VM scaling between the CSC and CSP..... | 5 | +| 7.10 | Interoperability testing of VM backup between the CSC and CSP..... | 5 | +| 7.11 | Interoperability testing of VM life cycle management between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.12 | Interoperability testing of physical machine life cycle management between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.13 | Interoperability testing of VM configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP ..... | 5 | +| 7.14 | Interoperability testing of physical machine configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP ..... | 6 | +| 8 | Storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP..... | 6 | +| 8.1 | Interoperability testing of storage migration between the CSC and CSP ..... | 6 | +| 8.2 | Interoperability testing of storage snapshot between the CSC and CSP ..... | 6 | +| 8.3 | Interoperability testing of storage backup between the CSC and CSP ..... | 6 | +| 8.4 | Interoperability testing of storage resource reservation between the CSC and CSP ..... | 6 | +| 8.5 | Interoperability testing of I/O performance between the CSC and CSP..... | 6 | +| 8.6 | Interoperability testing of storage life cycle management between the CSC and CSP..... | 6 | +| 8.7 | Interoperability testing of storage utilization status inquiring between the CSC and CSP..... | 6 | + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 9 Network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.1 Interoperability testing of network policy migration between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.2 Interoperability testing of network QoS between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.3 Interoperability testing of network address translation between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP..... | 7 | +| 9.5 Interoperability testing of IP address allocation between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.6 Interoperability testing of IP address reservation between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.7 Interoperability testing of load balance between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.8 Interoperability testing of firewall between the CSC and CSP ..... | 7 | +| 9.9 Interoperability testing of multipath routing between the CSC and CSP..... | 8 | +| 9.10 Interoperability testing of network information inquiring between the CSC and CSP..... | 8 | +| Appendix I – Test case template ..... | 9 | +| Appendix II – Test cases for cloud computing infrastructure capabilities interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 10 | +| II.1 Test cases for computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 10 | +| II.2 Test cases for storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 19 | +| II.3 Test cases for network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP ..... | 23 | +| Appendix III – Alignment analysis with [ITU-T Y.3513]..... | 29 | +| Bibliography..... | 35 | + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4041.1 + +## Cloud computing infrastructure capabilities interoperability testing – part 1: Interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies the cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP, including interoperability testing of computing services, storage services, network services and related management functions, based on the functional requirements specified in [ITU-T Y.3513]. + +The scope of this Recommendation consists of: + +- Overview of cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP; +- computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP; +- storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP; +- network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP. + +NOTE – This Recommendation is the first part of cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing, which focuses on validating the infrastructure capabilities type functions provided by the CSP to the CSC. The second part focuses on validating the interaction between CSPs in the inter-cloud environment. + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T Q.4040] Recommendation ITU-T Q.4040 (2016), *The framework and overview of cloud computing interoperability testing*. +- [ITU-T Y.101] Recommendation ITU-T Y.101 (2000), *Global Information Infrastructure terminology: Terms and definitions*. +- [ITU-T Y.3500] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3500 (2014) | ISO/IEC 17788:2014, *Information technology – Cloud computing – Overview and vocabulary*. +- [ITU-T Y.3502] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3502 (2014) | ISO/IEC 17789:2014, *Information technology – Cloud computing – Reference architecture*. +- [ITU-T Y.3513] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3513 (2014), *Cloud computing – Functional requirements of Infrastructure as a Service*. +- [ISO/IEC 19941] ISO/IEC 19941 (2017), *Information technology – Cloud computing – Interoperability and portability*. + +## 3 Definitions + +### 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 activity** [ITU-T Y.3502]: A specified pursuit or set of tasks. + +**3.1.2 cloud interoperability** [ITU-T Q.4040]: The capability to interact between CSCs and CSPs or between different CPSs, including the ability of CSCs to interact with cloud services and exchange information, the ability for one cloud service to work with other cloud services, and the ability for CSCs to interact with the cloud service management facilities of the CSPs. + +**3.1.3 cloud interoperability testing** [ITU-T Q.4040]: Verifying functions and interaction that realize the cloud interoperability. + +**3.1.4 cloud service** [ITU-T Y.3500]: One or more capabilities offered via cloud computing invoked using a defined interface. + +**3.1.5 cloud service customer** [ITU-T Y.3500]: Party which is in a business relationship for the purpose of using cloud services. + +**3.1.6 cloud service provider** [ITU-T Y.3500]: Party which makes cloud services available. + +**3.1.7 cloud service user** [ITU-T Y.3500]: Natural person, or entity acting on their behalf, associated with a cloud service customer that uses cloud services. + +NOTE – Examples of such entities include devices and applications. + +**3.1.8 interoperability** [ITU-T Y.101]: The ability of two or more systems or applications to exchange information and to mutually use the information that has been exchanged. + +### 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|-------------------------------------| +| CPU | Central Processing Unit | +| CSC | Cloud Service Customer | +| CSP | Cloud Service Provider | +| DHCP | Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol | +| FTP | File Transfer Protocol | +| HTTP | Hypertext Transfer Protocol | +| IaaS | Infrastructure as a Service | +| IOPS | Input/Output operations Per Second | +| I/O | Input/Output | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| LUN | Logical Unit Number | +| NAT | Network Address Translation | + +| | | +|-------|------------------------------| +| NIC | Network Interface Card | +| OVF | Open Virtualization Format | +| QCOW2 | QEMU Copy On Write version 2 | +| QEMU | Quick Emulator | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| SLA | Service Level Agreement | +| SSH | Secure Shell | +| VLAN | Virtual Local Area Network | +| VM | Virtual Machine | +| VMDK | Virtual Machine Disk | +| VNC | Virtual Network Computing | + +## 5 Conventions + +In this Recommendation, the keywords "is recommended" indicate a requirement which is recommended but which is not absolutely required. Thus this requirement need not be present to claim conformance. + +## 6 Overview of cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +Cloud interoperability is the ability of a CSC's system to interact with a cloud service, or the ability of one cloud service to interact with another cloud service, by exchanging information according to a prescribed method to obtain predictable results [ISO/IEC 19941]. The goal for cloud infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing is to devise and implement testing methods and conduct a basic set of functional tests for infrastructure capabilities type interoperability in a hybrid cloud environment using both private and public clouds [ITU-T Q.4040]. + +The cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing can be divided into two parts; the first part focuses on validating the infrastructure capabilities type functions provided by the CSP to the CSC, and the second part focuses on validating the interaction between CSPs in the inter-cloud environment. The scope of this Recommendation is to validate the interaction between the CSC and CSP with infrastructure capabilities. + +Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provides computing service functions, storage service functions and network service functions to the CSC [ITU-T Y.3513]. All the functional requirements specified in [ITU-T Y.3513] should be validated. It is recommended to consider the following for cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing: + +- Computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides a computing service to the CSC, including virtual machine (VM) configuration, VM migration, VM snapshot, VM clone, VM time synchronization, VM reservation, VM image, VM template, VM scaling and VM backup. + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides computing service related management functions to the CSC, including life cycle management of the VM and physical machine, and VM and physical machine configuration inquiring. + +- Storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides a storage service to the CSC, including storage migration, storage snapshot, storage backup, storage resource reservation and I/O performance. + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides storage service related management functions to the CSC, including storage life cycle management, storage utilization status inquiring. +- Network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides network service to the CSC, including network policy migration, network QoS, network address translation (NAT), network isolation, IP address allocation, IP address reservation, load balance, firewall and multipath routing. + - It is recommended to verify that the CSP provides network service related management function to the CSC, including network information inquiring. + +This Recommendation describes cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing from the functional perspective without distinguish five facets (transport, syntactic, semantic data, behavioural and policy) which were defines by [ISO/IEC 19941]. However, all the considerations described in [ISO/IEC 19941] are taking into account for better understanding of the cloud computing infrastructure capabilities type interoperability testing. + +## **7 Computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP** + +Computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP valuates the interaction between the CSC and CSP for computing service and related management functions, which include VM configuration, VM migration, VM snapshot, VM clone, VM time synchronization, VM reservation, VM image, VM template, VM scaling, VM backup, life cycle management of the VM and physical machine, and VM and physical machine configuration inquiring. For a description of related functional requirements refer to [ITU-T Y.3513]. + +### **7.1 Interoperability testing of VM configuration between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM configuration is to verify that the CSC configures the VM with processors, hard disks, memory and NIC parameters. The test case of VM configuration can be found in Appendix II.1.1. + +### **7.2 Interoperability testing of VM migration between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM migration is to verify that the CSC migrates the VM from a particular host to another host. The test case of VM migration can be found in Appendix II.1.2. + +### **7.3 Interoperability testing of VM snapshot between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM snapshot is to verify that the CSC captures the state (VM memory, settings, and virtual disks) of the VM by taking snapshots of it and rolling back to the previous VM state when needed. The test case of VM snapshot can be found in Appendix II.1.3. + +### **7.4 Interoperability testing of VM clone between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM clone is to verify that the CSC clones a particular VM and the cloned VM has identical configuration and CSP/CSC data as the original one. The test case of VM clone can be found in Appendix II.1.4. + +### **7.5 Interoperability testing of VM time synchronization between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM time synchronization is to verify that the CSC sets VM time synchronization manually or automatically. The test case of VM time synchronization can be found in Appendix II.1.5. + +### **7.6 Interoperability testing of VM reservation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM reservation is to verify that the CSC reserves available computing resources (CPU, memory) for particular VM before it is initiated. The test case of VM reservation can be found in Appendix II.1.6. + +### **7.7 Interoperability testing of VM image between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM image is to verify that the CSC creates a new VM by VM image, which consists of infrastructure configuration and CSP data, CSC data or both. The test case of VM image can be found in Appendix II.1.7. + +### **7.8 Interoperability testing of VM template between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM template is to verify that the CSC creates VMs by VM template, including the open virtualization format (OVF). The test case of VM template can be found in Appendix II.1.8. + +### **7.9 Interoperability testing of VM scaling between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM scaling is to verify that the CSC changes the scale of VMs dynamically based on the scaling policies and monitored events of the VM; this includes configuration change (e.g., CPU, memory, network bandwidth increased or decreased) and components change (new VM added or removed). The test case of VM scaling can be found in Appendix II.1.9. + +### **7.10 Interoperability testing of VM backup between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM backup is to verify that the CSC obtains the configuration and data of a particular VM by making a backup and restoring the VM. The test case of VM backup can be found in Appendix II.1.10. + +### **7.11 Interoperability testing of VM life cycle management between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM life cycle management is to verify that the CSC manages the VM with various operations including start, shutdown, restart, suspend and resume VM. The test case of VM life cycle management can be found in Appendix II.1.11. + +### **7.12 Interoperability testing of physical machine life cycle management between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of physical machine life cycle management is to verify that the CSC manages the physical machine with various operations including start, shutdown, hibernate and wake-up. The test case of physical machine life cycle management can be found in Appendix II.1.12. + +### **7.13 Interoperability testing of VM configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of VM configuration inquiring is to verify that the CSC inquires VM configuration with the CPU number, memory allocated, NIC number and IP address allocated. The test case of VM configuration inquiring can be found in Appendix II.1.13. + +### **7.14 Interoperability testing of physical machine configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of physical machine configuration inquiring is to verify that the CSC inquires physical machine configuration with the number of CPU cores, memory size, disk size and NIC number. The test case of physical machine configuration inquiring can be found in Appendix II.1.14. + +## **8 Storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP** + +Storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP evaluates the interaction between the CSC and CSP for storage service and related management functions; these include storage migration, storage snapshot, storage backup, storage resource reservation, I/O performance, storage life cycle management and storage utilization status inquiring. For a description of related functional requirements refer to [ITU-T Y.3513]. + +### **8.1 Interoperability testing of storage migration between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage migration is to verify that the CSC migrates data of the VM to different storage media without any loss. The test case of storage migration can be found in Appendix II.2.1. + +### **8.2 Interoperability testing of storage snapshot between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage snapshot is to verify that the CSC preserves and recovers the state and data of storage. The test case of storage snapshot can be found in Appendix II.2.2. + +### **8.3 Interoperability testing of storage backup between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage backup is to verify that the CSC backs up and restores data when faulty or data loss occurs. The test case of storage backup can be found in Appendix II.2.3. + +### **8.4 Interoperability testing of storage resource reservation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage resource reservation is to verify that the CSC reserves available storage resources (e.g., storage space and LUN) for the VM. The test case of storage resource reservation can be found in Appendix II.2.4. + +### **8.5 Interoperability testing of I/O performance between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of I/O performance is to verify that the CSC constrains the I/O traffic of a particular VM with a specified level. The test case of I/O performance can be found in Appendix II.2.5. + +### **8.6 Interoperability testing of storage life cycle management between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage life cycle management is to verify that the CSC manages storage with various operations including create, attach, detach, query and delete storage. The test case of storage life cycle management can be found in Appendix II.2.6. + +### **8.7 Interoperability testing of storage utilization status inquiring between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of storage utilization status inquiring is to verify that the CSC inquires storage utilization status information including used space and unused space of storage. The test case of storage utilization status inquiring can be found in Appendix II.2.7. + +## **9 Network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP** + +Network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP valuates the interaction between the CSC and CSP for network service and related management functions, which include network policy migration, network QoS, network address translation, network isolation, IP address allocation, IP address reservation, load balance, firewall, multipath routing and network information inquiring. For a description of related functional requirements refer to [ITU-T Y.3513]. + +### **9.1 Interoperability testing of network policy migration between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of network policy migration is to verify that the CSC migrates the VM while the network policy (generally includes access control list, bandwidth limitation and priority policy) is consistent before and after VM migration. The test case of network policy migration can be found in Appendix II.3.1. + +### **9.2 Interoperability testing of network QoS between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of network QoS is to verify that the CSC configures network QoS for the VM, including bandwidth limitation, bandwidth reservation, traffic shaping, traffic classification and congestion avoidance. The test case of network QoS can be found in Appendix II.3.2. + +### **9.3 Interoperability testing of network address translation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of network address translation is to verify that the CSC configures the mapping between an internal IP address and external IP address of a specific VM. The test case of network address translation can be found in Appendix II.3.3. + +### **9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of network isolation is to verify that the CSC's tenant network is isolated even though the network address is overlapped with another tenants' network. The test case of network isolation can be found in Appendix II.3.4. + +### **9.5 Interoperability testing of IP address allocation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of IP address allocation is to verify that the CSC allocates an IP address to the VM statically or dynamically. The test case of IP address allocation can be found in Appendix II.3.5. + +### **9.6 Interoperability testing of IP address reservation between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of IP address reservation is to verify that the CSC reserves an IP address or a range of IP addresses for specific VM(s). The test case of IP address reservation can be found in Appendix II.3.6. + +### **9.7 Interoperability testing of load balance between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of load balance is to verify that the CSC deploys a load balance mechanism for multiple VMs in order to achieve scalability and fault tolerance of an application. The test case of load balance can be found in Appendix II.3.7. + +### **9.8 Interoperability testing of firewall between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of firewall is to verify that the CSC monitors and controls incoming and outgoing VM traffic based on predetermined security rules. The test case of firewall can be found in Appendix II.3.8. + +### **9.9 Interoperability testing of multipath routing between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of multipath routing is to verify that the CSC accesses cloud services through multiple network paths. The test case of multipath routing can be found in Appendix II.3.9. + +### **9.10 Interoperability testing of network information inquiring between the CSC and CSP** + +The test object of network information inquiring is to verify that the CSC inquires network information from the CSP with network device(s) specification, network traffic performance (in terms of throughput, jitter, loss, delay) and network topology. The test case of network address inquiring can be found in Appendix II.3.10. + +# Appendix I + +## Test case template + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +Table I.1 provides a test case template to describe cloud computing infrastructure capability type interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP. The test case template is designed with reference to relevant technical specifications. As shown in the table, an interoperability test case consists of test purpose, reference, test sequence and test verdict. + +- Test purpose is a statement that specifies which test case to verify. +- Reference of the test case provides list of references to the base specification clause(s), use case(s), requirement(s), etc. which are either used in the test or define the functionality being tested. +- The test sequences provide the steps required to perform the test. There are two types of test step. A stimulus corresponds to an event that triggers a specific action on the object under test. There is no need to provide result for a stimulus step. A check consists of observing that the object under test behaves as described. A result must be provided for every check step. If the object under test behaves as described in the description of the check step, the result should be recorded as OK, otherwise the result should be recorded as fail. +- For every test case, test verdict should be provided to indicate whether the test is passed. + +**Table I.1 – Test case template** + +| Interoperability test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| Test purpose | A concise summary of the test reflecting its purpose and allowing readers to easily distinguish this test from any other test in the document. | | | | +| Reference | List of references to the base specification clause(s), use case(s), requirement(s), etc., which are either used in the test or define the functionality being tested. | | | | +| Test sequences | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | A stimulus corresponds to an event that triggers a specific action on the object under test. There is no need to provide 'Result' for a stimulus step. | There is no need to provide 'Result' for a stimulus step. | +| | 2 | Check | A check consists of observing that the object under test behaves as described. A result must be provided for every check step. If the object under test behaves as described in the description of the check step, the result should be recorded as OK, otherwise the result should be recorded as fail. | A result must be provided for every check step. | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all/or one check(s) is (are) successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +# Appendix II + +## Test cases for cloud computing infrastructure capabilities interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +### II.1 Test cases for computing service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +#### II.1.1 Test case: VM configuration + +**Table II.1 – Test case: VM configuration** + +| VM configuration test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC configures the VM with processors, hard disks, memory and NIC parameters. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the processor parameters of the VM, in the permissible range of physical resources conditions. | | +| | 2 | Check | Processor parameters configuration is in effect. The processor of the VM is consistent with the parameters specified in step 1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the hard disk parameters of the VM, in the permissible range of physical resources conditions. | | +| | 4 | Check | Hard disk parameters configuration is in effect. The hard disks of the VM are consistent with the parameters specified in step 3. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the NIC parameters of the VM, in the permissible range of physical resources conditions. | | +| | 6 | Check | NIC parameters configuration is in effect. The NIC of the VM is consistent with parameters specified in step 5. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.1.2 Test case: VM migration + +Table II.2 shows the test case for VM migration. + +**Table II.2 – Test case: VM migration** + +| VM migration test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC migrates the VM from a particular host to another host. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.3 | | | | +| | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC migrates the VM in power off state to another host. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC starts the VM. | | +| | 3 | Check | The VM is running on the target host without any changes. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | The CSC migrates the running VM to another host. | | +| | 5 | Check | The VM is running on the target host without any changes; the service carried by the VM is still on during the migration. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if at least one check is successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.1.3 Test case: VM snapshot + +Table II.3 shows the test case for VM snapshot. + +**Table II.3 – Test case: VM snapshot** + +| VM snapshot test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC captures the state (VM memory, settings and virtual disks) of the VM by taking snapshots and rolling back to the previous VM state when needed. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.5 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC uses an application running on a VM. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC takes a snapshot (with memory state) of the VM, called snapshot A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC makes some changes to the application and closes it, and reconfigures the VM. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | The CSC takes another snapshot (with memory state) of the VM, called snapshot B. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC restores snapshot A. | | +| | 6 | Check | The VM's virtual disk, configurations and memory state are consistent with the state when snapshot A was taken. The application is running on the VM without any changes. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC deletes snapshot A and restores snapshot B. | | + +**Table II.3 – Test case: VM snapshot** + +| VM snapshot test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 8 | Check | The VM's virtual disk, configurations and memory state are consistent with the state when snapshot B was taken. The application is not running on the VM. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.4 Test case: VM clone** + +Table II.4 shows the test case for VM clone. + +**Table II.4 – Test case: VM clone** + +| VM clone test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC clones a particular VM and the cloned VM has identical configuration and CSP/CSC data as the original one. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.6 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC clones VM A, called VM A-1. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC starts VM A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC starts VM A-1. | | +| | 4 | Check | VM A and VM A-1 can run independently without affecting each other. | | +| | 5 | Check | Configuration and CSP/CSC data of VM A-1 is consistent with VM A. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.5 Test case: VM time synchronization** + +Table II.5 shows the test case for VM time synchronization. + +**Table II.5 – Test case: VM time synchronization** + +| VM time synchronization test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC sets VM time synchronization manually or automatically. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.8 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC synchronizes the VM A system time to a specified time manually. | | +| | 2 | Check | The system time of VM A is consistent with the specified time in step 1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the synchronization of VM A's time along with that of the host automatically. | | + +**Table II.5 – Test case: VM time synchronization** + +| VM time synchronization test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 4 | Stimulus | The CSC logs in VM A and adjusts the system time to a different time. | | +| | 5 | Check | The system time of VM A is synchronized with the host that the VM is running on. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.6 Test case: VM reservation** + +Table II.6 shows the test case for VM reservation. + +**Table II.6 – Test case: VM reservation** + +| VM reservation test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC reserves available computing resources (CPU, memory) for a particular VM before it is initiated. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.9 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures VM reservation, which includes the configuration of guaranteed minimum allocation of CPU and memory for a specified VM, called VM A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application to perform heavy consumption of CPU and memory on other VMs hosted in the same host except for VM A. Consumption of CPU and memory is close to the amount of the host computing resource. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC performs heavy consumption of CPU and memory on VM A. | | +| | 4 | Check | CPU and memory resources reserved for VM A are not occupied by other VMs. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.7 Test case: VM image** + +Table II.7 shows the test case for VM image. + +**Table II.7 – Test case: VM image** + +| VM image test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|-------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC creates a new VM by VM image, which consists of infrastructure configuration and CSP data, CSC data or both. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.10 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | + +**Table II.7 – Test case: VM image** + +| VM image test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC creates an image, called image A. Image A is converted from existing VM1. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC creates a VM based on image A. | | +| | 3 | Check | New VM (VM2) can be created based on image A. The configuration, CSP data and CSC data of new VMs are consistent with VM1. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | The CSC exports image A as exported image in different supporting format, such as QCOW2, VMDK, etc. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC imports the exported image as image B. | | +| | 6 | Stimulus | The CSC creates a VM based on image B. | | +| | 7 | Check | A new VM can be created based on image B. The configuration, CSP data and CSC data of new VMs created based on the VM image are consistent with the VM image. | | +| | 8 | Stimulus | The CSC updates image B by modifying the name of the image. | | +| | 9 | Check | The name of the image changes to a specified name. | | +| | 10 | Stimulus | The CSC deletes image B. | | +| | 11 | Check | The VMs created which are based on image B still exist. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.1.8 Test case: VM template + +Table II.8 shows the test case for VM template. + +**Table II.8 – Test case: VM template** + +| VM template test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC creates VMs by VM template, including open virtualization format (OVF). | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.11 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC creates a VM template by exporting a VM as VM template in OVF format. | | +| | 2 | Check | The exported VM template conforms to the format of OVF. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC imports the VM template to create a new VM. | | +| | 4 | Check | The configuration and data of the new VM created in step 3 are consistent with the VM template. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC updates the VM template by modifying the VM template's name. | | + +**Table II.8 – Test case: VM template** + +| VM template test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 6 | Check | The name of VM template changes to a specified name. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC deletes the VM template. | | +| | 8 | Check | The VM created which is based on the VM template still exists. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.9 Test case: VM scaling** + +Table II.9 shows the test case for VM scaling. + +**Table II.9 – Test case: VM scaling** + +| VM scaling test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC changes the scale of VMs dynamically based on the scaling policies and monitored events of the VM; this includes configuration change (e.g., CPU, memory, network bandwidth increased or decreased) and components change (new VM added or removed). | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.4 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures VM A; checks the VM status, such as CPU, memory resources allocation and its components. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the configuration change based scaling policy that when memory consumed is more than 90%, it allocates twice the memory for VM A automatically. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application on VM A to perform more than 90% consumption of memory on VM A to trigger auto-scaling. | | +| | 4 | Check | VM A is allocated with twice as much memory as before. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the components change based scaling policy that when the CPU has consumed more than 90%, add a new VM with the same resource configuration as VM A automatically. | | +| | 6 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application on VM A to perform more than 90% consumption of CPU on VM A to trigger auto-scaling. | | +| | 7 | Check | A new VM with the same resource configuration as VM A is added. | | +| | 8 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the configuration change based scaling policy that when memory consumed is less than | | + +**Table II.9 – Test case: VM scaling** + +| VM scaling test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | | | 10%, reduce memory allocation by half for VM A automatically. | | +| | 9 | Check | The CSC performs low(less than 10%) consumption of memory on VM A to trigger auto-scaling. | | +| | 10 | Stimulus | Memory allocation for VM A is reduced by half. | | +| | 11 | Check | The CSC configures the components change based scaling policy that when the CPU consumed less than 10%, remove a VM automatically. | | +| | 12 | Stimulus | The CSC performs low(less than 10%) consumption of CPU on VM A to trigger auto-scaling. | | +| | 13 | Check | VM A is terminated. | | +| | 14 | Stimulus | The CSC configures events monitoring based components change for VM A that when VM A is suspended, add a new VM with the same resource configuration as VM A automatically. | | +| | 15 | Stimulus | The CSC suspends VM A. | | +| | 16 | Check | A new VM with the same resource configuration as VM A is added. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.10 Test case: VM backup** + +Table II.10 shows the test case for VM backup. + +**Table II.10 – Test case: VM backup** + +| VM backup test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC obtains the configuration and data of a particular VM by making a backup and restoring the VM. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.7 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC makes a backup of VM A, called backup A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC changes the configuration and data of VM A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC restores VM A with backup A. | | +| | 4 | Check | Configuration and data of VM A is consistent with the state when backup A was taken. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.11 Test case: VM life cycle management** + +Table II.11 shows the test case for VM life cycle management. + +**Table II.11 – Test case: VM life cycle management** + +| VM life cycle management test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC manages the VM with various operations including start, shutdown, restart, suspend and resume VM. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC shuts down a VM which has its power on. | | +| | 2 | Check | The state of the VM is power off. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC starts the VM. | | +| | 4 | Check | The state of the VM is power on. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC restarts the VM. | | +| | 6 | Check | The state of the VM is power on. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC suspends the VM, tries to log in VM's operating system through SSH, VNC or other tools provided by the CSP. | | +| | 8 | Check | The state of the VM is suspended and VM's activity is paused. The CSC cannot log in the VM's operating system through SSH, VNC or other tools. | | +| | 9 | Stimulus | The CSC resumes the VM, then checks the power states of the VM, tries to log in VM's operating system through SSH, VNC or other tools provided by the CSP. | | +| | 10 | Check | The state of the VM is power on and the VM's activity is consistent with the moment before suspend operation. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.1.12 Test case: physical machine life cycle management + +Table II.12 shows the test case for physical machine life cycle management. + +**Table II.12 – Test case: physical machine life cycle management** + +| Physical machine life cycle management test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC manages a physical machine with various operations including start, shutdown, hibernate and wakeup. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.1 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC shuts down a physical machine which has its power on. | | +| | 2 | Check | The state of the physical machine is power off. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC starts the physical machine. | | +| | 4 | Check | The state of the physical machine is power on. | | + +**Table II.12 – Test case: physical machine life cycle management** + +| Physical machine life cycle management test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC hibernates a physical machine which is in power on state. | | +| | 6 | Check | The state of the physical machine is hibernate. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC wakes up the physical machine which is in hibernate state. | | +| | 8 | Check | The state of the physical machine is power on. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.13 Test case: VM configuration inquiring** + +Table II.13 shows the test case for VM configuration inquiring. + +**Table II.13 – Test case: VM configuration inquiring** + +| VM configuration inquiring test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC inquires VM configuration with CPU number, memory allocated, NIC number, IP address allocated. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the CPU number of the VM. | | +| | 2 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular VM's CPU number that is consistent with the number of the CPU allocated for the VM. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC queries memory size of the VM from the CSP. | | +| | 4 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular VM's memory size that is consistent with the size of memory allocated for the VM. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the NIC number of the VM from the CSP. | | +| | 6 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular VM's NIC number that is consistent with the number of the NIC allocated for the VM. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the IP address of the VM from the CSP. | | +| | 8 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular VM's IP address that is consistent with the IP address allocated for the VM. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.1.14 Test case: physical machine configuration inquiring** + +Table II.14 shows the test case for physical machine status inquiring. + +**Table II.14 – Test case: physical machine status inquiring** + +| Physical machine configuration inquiring test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | | To verify that the CSC inquires physical machine configuration with the number of CPU cores, memory size, disk size and NIC number. | | | +| Reference | | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.1.1 | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the CPU's cores number of the physical machine from the CSP. | | +| | 2 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular physical machine's CPU cores number that is consistent with the CPU cores number of the physical machine. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC queries memory size of the physical machine from the CSP. | | +| | 4 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular physical machine's memory size that is consistent with the memory size of the physical machine. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the disk size of the physical machine from the CSP. | | +| | 6 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular physical machine's disk size that is consistent with the disk size of the physical machine. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC queries The NIC number of the physical machine from the CSP. | | +| | 8 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular physical machine's NIC number that is consistent with the NIC number of the physical machine. | | +| Test verdict | | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | + +### **II.2 Test cases for storage service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP** + +#### **II.2.1 Test case: storage migration** + +Table II.15 shows the test case for storage migration. + +**Table II.15 – Test case: storage migration** + +| Storage migration test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | | To verify that the CSC migrates data of the VM to different storage media without any loss. | | | +| Reference | | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2.1 | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC migrates the VM's data from local storage to shared storage. | | + +**Table II.15 – Test case: storage migration** + +| Storage migration test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 2 | Check | The VM uses the shared storage after migration is done without affecting the service running on the VM. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC migrates the VM's data from shared storage to local storage. | | +| | 4 | Check | The VM uses the local storage after migration is done without affect the service running on the VM. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.2.2 Test case: storage snapshot + +Table II.16 shows the test case for storage snapshot. + +**Table II.16 – Test case: Storage snapshot** + +| Storage snapshot test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC preserves and recovers the state and data of storage. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC takes a storage snapshot of storage A, called snapshot A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC changes the data of storage A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC takes another storage snapshot of storage A, called snapshot B. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | The CSC restores snapshot A. | | +| | 5 | Check | Storage A's state and data are consistent with the states when snapshot A was taken. | | +| | 6 | Stimulus | The CSC deletes snapshot A. | | +| | 7 | Check | Snapshot A can be deleted without affecting snapshot B. | | +| | 8 | Stimulus | The CSC restores snapshot B. | | +| | 9 | Check | Storage A's state and data are consistent with the states when snapshot B was taken. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.2.3 Test case: storage backup + +Table II.17 shows the test case for storage backup. + +**Table II.17 – Test case: storage backup** + +| Storage backup test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC backs up and restores data when faulty or data loss occurs. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2.3 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC takes a storage backup of storage A, called backup storage A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC changes the data in the storage A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC restores storage A with storage backup A. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.2.4 Test case: storage resource reservation** + +Table II.18 shows the test case for storage resource reservation. + +**Table II.18 – Test case: storage resource reservation** + +| Storage resource reservation test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC reserves available storage resource (e.g., storage space and LUN) for the VM. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2.5 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures storage reservation for VM A, which has guaranteed minimum allocation of storage space. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application to perform heavy consumption of storage usage on VMs hosting in the same host except for VM A. The total consumption of storage is close to the amount of the storage available for the host. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC performs heavy consumption of storage usage on VM A. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.2.5 Test case: I/O performance** + +Table II.19 shows the test case for I/O performance. + +**Table II.19 – Test case: I/O performance** + +| I/O performance test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC constrains I/O traffic of a particular VM with a specified level. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2.4 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application to perform heavy reading and writing of storage on VM A. It records the actual IOPS obtained by VM A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC configures I/O performance limitation for VM A. The IOPS limit configured is significantly lower than the IOPS obtained in step 1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC runs an application to perform heavy reading and writing on VM A. | | +| | 4 | Check | The actual IOPS obtained by VM A does not exceed the limitation. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.2.6 Test case: storage life cycle management** + +Table II.20 shows the test case for storage life cycle management. + +**Table II.20 – Test case: Storage life cycle management** + +| Storage life cycle management test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC manages storage with various operations including create, attach, detach, query and delete storage. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC creates storage space called storage A with different types, such as block level, file-system level and object-based storage according to a service level agreement (SLA). | | +| | 2 | Check | The created storage A is accessible to the CSC. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC attaches storage A to VM A. | | +| | 4 | Check | The VM can use storage A. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC detaches storage A from VM A. | | +| | 6 | Check | VM A cannot use storage A anymore but storage A could be used for other VMs. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | Deletes storage A. | | +| | 8 | Check | Storage A cannot be used. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.2.7 Test case: storage utilization status inquiring + +Table II.21 shows the test case for storage utilization status inquiring. + +**Table II.21 – Test case: Storage utilization status inquiring** + +| Storage utilization status inquiring test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC inquires storage utilization status information including used space and unused space of storage. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC queries utilization status of storage, including used space and unused space of storage. | | +| | 2 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular storage's used space and unused space that is consistent with the actual utilization status of the storage. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +### II.3 Test cases for network service interoperability testing between the CSC and CSP + +#### II.3.1 Test case: network policy migration + +Table II.22 shows the test case for network policy migration. + +**Table II.22 – Test case: network policy migration** + +| Network policy migration test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC migrates the VM while the network policy (generally includes access control list, bandwidth limitation and priority policy) is consistent before and after VM migration. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.1 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the network policy for VM A, including configuring the access control list, bandwidth limitation and priority policy for VM A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC migrates VM A to another host. | | +| | 3 | Check | The access control list configuration of VM A is consistent with the original configuration before migration. | | +| | 4 | Check | The bandwidth limitation configuration of VM A is consistent with the original configuration before migration. | | +| | 5 | Check | The priority policy configuration of VM A is consistent with original the configuration before migration. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.3.2 Test case: network QoS + +Table II.23 shows the test case for network QoS. + +**Table II.23 – Test case: network QoS** + +| Network QoS test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC configures network QoS for the VM, including bandwidth limitation, bandwidth reservation, traffic shaping, traffic classification and congestion avoidance. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.2 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the bandwidth limitation for the interworking between two VMs. | | +| | 2 | Check | Network throughput between the two VMs does not exceed the bandwidth specified in step 1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures bandwidth reservation for the interworking between two VMs. | | +| | 4 | Check | Network throughput between the two VMs is not less than the reserved bandwidth specified in step 3. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC configures traffic shaping for the specified interface of VM A. | | +| | 6 | Check | The traffic of a specified interface of VM A is sent at a more stable rate with lower jitter than before. | | +| | 7 | Stimulus | The CSC configures traffic classification for the specified interface of VM A. | | +| | 8 | Check | The traffic of a specified interface of VM A is automatically categorized into a number of traffic classes. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### II.3.3 Test case: network address translation + +Table II.24 shows the test case for network address translation. + +**Table II.24 – Test case: network address translation** + +| Network address translation test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC configures the mapping between an internal IP address and external IP address of a specific VM. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.3 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures NAT to map the VM's private network address to the public network address. | | +| | 2 | Check | The private IP address of the VM is translated to specify a public address while accessing the Internet. | | + +**Table II.24 – Test case: network address translation** + +| Network address translation test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures NAT to map the public network address to the VM's private network address. | | +| | 4 | Check | The public IP address of the VM is translated to the private network address. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.4 Test case: network isolation** + +Table II.25 shows the test case for network isolation. + +**Table II.25 – Test case: Network isolation** + +| Network isolation test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC's tenant network is isolated even though the network address is overlapped with another tenants' network. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.4 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC logs in as tenant A and creates a VM called VM A. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | The CSC creates a VM called VM C assigned with the network address of the same subnet as VM A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC logs in as tenant B and creates a VM called VM B assigned with the network address of the same subnet as VM A. | | +| | 4 | Check | VM A can communicate with VM C. | | +| | 5 | Check | VMA and VM B cannot communicate with each other. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.5 Test case: IP address allocation** + +Table II.26 shows the test case for IP address allocation. + +**Table II.26 – Test case: IP address allocation** + +| IP address allocation test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC allocates an IP address to the VM statically or dynamically. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.3 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC allocates specified IP addresses for the VM statically. | | +| | 2 | Check | The VM gets the IP as requested by the CSC. | | + +**Table II.26 – Test case: IP address allocation** + +| IP address allocation test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC allocates IP addresses for the VM through dynamic allocation (DHCP) with a specified IP addresses pool. | | +| | 4 | Check | VMs get the IP within the range of the IP pool specified by the CSC. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if at least one check is successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.6 Test case: IP address reservation** + +Table II.27 shows the test case for IP address reservation. + +**Table II.27 – Test case: IP address reservation** + +| IP address reservation test description | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC reserves an IP address or a range of IP addresses for specific VM(s). | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.3 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC reserved a particular IP address for VM A. | | +| | 2 | Check | The reserved IP address will not be assigned to VMs other than VM A. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC reserved a range of IP addresses for VM B. | | +| | 4 | Check | The reserved IP addresses will not be assigned to VMs other than VM B. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if at least one check is successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.7 Test case: load balance** + +Table II.28 shows the test case for load balance. + +**Table II.28 – Test case: load balance** + +| Load balance test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC deploys a load balance mechanism for multiple VMs in order to achieve scalability and fault tolerance of an application. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.6 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures a round-robin based load balance for HTTP traffic among VMs. | | +| | 2 | Check | The HTTP request is forwarded to each server in turn based on a round-robin load balancing policy in step 1. | | + +**Table II.28 – Test case: load balance** + +| Load balance test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures a least-connection scheduling based load balance for FTP traffic among VMs. | | +| | 4 | Check | The FTP workload is balanced by assigning a new connection request to the VM with the smallest number of connections based on a least-connection scheduling load balancing policy in step 3. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.8 Test case: firewall** + +Table II.29 shows the test case for firewall. + +**Table II.29 – Test case: Firewall** + +| Firewall test description | | | | | +|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC monitors and controls incoming and outgoing VM traffic based on predetermined security rules. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.7 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the VM's network policies to reject all incoming traffic. | | +| | 2 | Check | The VM's incoming traffic is dropped by the firewall. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | The CSC configures the VM's network policy to reject all outgoing traffic. | | +| | 4 | Check | The VM's outgoing traffic is dropped by the firewall. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +#### **II.3.9 Test case: multipath routing** + +Table II.30 shows the test case for multipath routing. + +**Table II.30 – Test case: multipath routing** + +| Multipath routing test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC accesses a cloud service through multiple network paths. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3.6 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC enables a multipath routing function for a particular cloud service. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | One network path is unavailable. | | +| | 4 | Check | The particular service is still accessed with the SLA guaranteed by another network path. | | + +**Table II.30 – Test case: multipath routing** + +| Multipath routing test description | | | +|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | + +#### **II.3.10 Test case: network information inquiring** + +Table II.31 shows the test case for network information inquiring. + +**Table II.31 – Test case: network information inquiring** + +| Network information inquiring test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the CSC inquires network information from the CSP with network device(s) specification, network traffic performance (in terms of throughput, jitter, loss, delay) and network topology. | | | | +| Reference | [ITU-T Y.3513] clause 7.3 | | | | +| Test sequence | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Stimulus | The CSC queries the network device's information. | | +| | 2 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular network's device specification that is consistent with the actual status of the network. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | CSC queries network traffic performance. | | +| | 4 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular network's traffic performance status that is consistent with the actual status of the network. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | The CSC queries network topology. | | +| | 6 | Check | The CSC receives the information of a particular network's topology that is consistent with the actual status of the network. | | +| Test verdict | It is deemed as successfully terminated if all the checks are successful, otherwise it is deemed as failed. | | | | + +# Appendix III + +## Alignment analysis with [ITU-T Y.3513] + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +[ITU-T Y.3513] introduces the concept of Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and describes its functional requirements. As one of the cloud computing service categories, IaaS provides infrastructure capabilities as services by cloud service providers. It is necessary to ensure that the test cases cover requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]. Alignment analysis with requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] is provided as Table III.1. + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| | Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|---|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| +| 1 | 7 Functional requirement | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides to the CSC IaaS functions, such as a composition of processing, storage, and networking resources with service logic, specific service level agreements (SLAs) and charging model. | Too general, not involved. | +| 2 | | – It is required that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to provisioned infrastructure resources, such as assign, modify, query and release. | Too general, not involved. | +| 3 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides status information about the infrastructure in response to queries from the CSC. | Too general, not involved. | +| 4 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a template to the CSC, related to instantiation of infrastructure, which allows for provision processing, storage and networking resources that could be implemented based on the configuration. | Too general, not involved. | +| 5 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to infrastructure templates to allow modification of infrastructure, such as upload, update, disable, enable, query or release. | Too general, not involved. | +| 6 | 7.1 Computing service functional requirements | – It is required that the IaaS CSP provides computing functions with specific SLAs and charging model to the CSC. | Too general, not involved. | + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| | | Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|----|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 7 | 7.1.1 Physical machine | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides specific hardware specifications of a physical machine to the CSC according to the SLA. | – 7.12 Interoperability testing of physical machine life cycle management between the CSC and CSP | +| 8 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operation handling mechanisms related to a physical machine, such as start, shutdown, hibernate and wakeup. | – 7.12 Interoperability testing of physical machine life cycle management between the CSC and CSP | +| 9 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides physical machine related information in response to queries from the CSC. | – 7.14 Interoperability testing of physical machine configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP | +| 10 | 7.1.2 Virtual machine | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine based on the VM template. | – 7.8 Interoperability testing of VM template between the CSC and CSP | +| 11 | | – The IaaS CSP can optionally provide a virtual machine based on the configurations specified by the CSC. | – 7.1 Interoperability testing of VM configuration between the CSC and CSP | +| 12 | | – It is required that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to the VM, including, but not limited to, create, delete, start, shutdown, suspend, restore, hibernate and wakeup. | – 7.11 Interoperability testing of VM life cycle management between the CSC and CSP | +| 13 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides VM-related information in response to queries from the CSC. | – 7.13 Interoperability testing of VM configuration inquiring between the CSC and CSP | +| 14 | 7.1.3 VM migration | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine with migration functions. Based on migration policies, the virtual machine can be migrated from one host to another. | – 7.2 Interoperability testing of VM migration between the CSC and CSP | +| 15 | 7.1.4 VM scaling | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine with scaling functions based on the scaling policies and monitored events of the virtual machine. | – 7.9 Interoperability testing of VM scaling between the CSC and CSP | +| 16 | 7.1.5 VM snapshot | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine with snapshot functions. Schedule of snapshots taken from the virtual machine can be performed automatically or manually. | – 7.3 Interoperability testing of VM snapshot between the CSC and CSP | + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 17 | 7.1.6 VM clone
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine with clone functions. The cloned VM has identical configuration and CSP/CSC data as the original one. | – 7.4 Interoperability testing of VM clone between the CSC and CSP | +| 18 | 7.1.7 VM backup
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides a virtual machine with backup functions. When the VM becomes faulty or its data is lost, the VM can be restored using its backup stored according to the CSC policy. | – 7.10 Interoperability testing of VM backup between the CSC and CSP | +| 19 | 7.1.8 VM time synchronization
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides time synchronization functions, which allow the CSC to control the VM time. | – 7.5 Interoperability testing of VM time synchronization between the CSC and CSP | +| 20 | 7.1.9 VM reservation
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides processing resources reservation (such as CPU, memory) functions. Resources reservation is used to reserve available resources from IaaS infrastructure before VM is initiated. | – 7.6 Interoperability testing of VM reservation between the CSC and CSP | +| 21 | 7.1.10 VM image
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP offers the ability for the CSC to provide and use virtual machine images. A VM image consists of infrastructure configuration and CSP data, CSC data or both. | – 7.7 Interoperability testing of VM image between the CSC and CSP | +| 22 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP supports a different machine image format.
– 7.7 Interoperability testing of VM image between the CSC and CSP | +| 23 | | – It is required that the IaaS CSP provides operation handling mechanisms related to image, including, but not limited to, add, import, store, register, deregister, query, update, delete and export.
– 7.7 Interoperability testing of VM image between the CSC and CSP | +| 24 | 7.1.11 VM template
– It is recommended that the IaaS CSP supports the open virtualization format (OVF) template, which is a packaging standard designed to address the portability and deployment of virtual appliances. | – 7.8 Interoperability testing of VM template between the CSC and CSP | +| 25 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides operations handling mechanisms related to machine templates, such as upload, update,
– 7.8 Interoperability testing of VM template between the CSC and CSP | + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| | | Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|----|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | disable, enable, query and delete to the CSC. | | +| 26 | 7.2 Storage service functional requirements | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage functions, such as block level storage, file level storage and object-based storage, with specific SLAs and charging model to the CSC. The storage functions can be provided to the CSC directly or used by the virtual machine as attached storage. | – 8.6 Interoperability testing of storage life cycle management between the CSC and CSP | +| 27 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to storage, such as create, attach, detach, query and delete a volume of storage at either block level or file-system level, write, read and delete data for a given storage. | – 8.6 Interoperability testing of storage life cycle management between the CSC and CSP | +| 28 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage utilisation information in response to queries from the CSC. | – 8.7 Interoperability testing of storage utilization status inquiring between the CSC and CSP | +| 29 | 7.2.1 Storage migration | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage migration functions. Based on migration policies, data can be migrated between different logical unit numbers (LUNs), different storage devices, local storage to shared storage and vice versa. | – 8.1 Interoperability testing of storage migration between the CSC and CSP | +| 30 | 7.2.2 Storage snapshot | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage with snapshot functions. Snapshot can be realized at either block or file-system levels. The data can be restored using the snapshot. | – 8.2 Interoperability testing of storage snapshot between the CSC and CSP | +| 31 | 7.2.3 Storage backup | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage with backup functions. Backup can be realized at block level, file level or object-based storage. | – 8.3 Interoperability testing of storage backup between the CSC and CSP | +| 32 | 7.2.4 I/O performance | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides input/output (I/O) limitation for each VM. | – 8.5 Interoperability testing of I/O performance between the CSC and CSP | +| 33 | 7.2.5 Storage resource reservation | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides storage resource (e.g., storage space and LUN) reservation functions. | – 8.4 Interoperability testing of storage resource reservation between the CSC and CSP | + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| | | Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|----|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 34 | 7.3 Network service functional requirements | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides network functions, such as IP address, VLAN, virtual switch, load balance, firewall, with specific SLAs or charging model. Network functions are applied to access and interconnect processing and storage resources. | – 9.7 Interoperability testing of load balance between the CSC and CSP
– 9.8 Interoperability testing of firewall between the CSC and CSP | +| 35 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides network information in response to queries from the CSC. | – 9.10 Interoperability testing of network information inquiring between the CSC and CSP | +| 36 | 7.3.1 Network policy migration | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides network policy migration along with virtual machine migration. In this case, the network policy of the migrated virtual machine is the same as before the migration. | – 9.1 Interoperability testing of network policy migration between the CSC and CSP | +| 37 | 7.3.2 Network QoS | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides operation handling mechanisms related to the network quality of service (QoS), such as bandwidth limit, bandwidth reservation, traffic shaping, traffic classification, congestion avoidance, at port level, device level and network level. | – 9.2 Interoperability testing of network QoS between the CSC and CSP | +| 38 | 7.3.3 IP Address | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides IP address reservation. | – 9.6 Interoperability testing of IP address reservation between the CSC and CSP | +| 39 | | – It is required that the IaaS CSP allows the CSC to apply, bind, unbind, query, release an IP address to processing resources or storage resources. | – 9.5 Interoperability testing of IP address allocation between the CSC and CSP | +| 40 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP allows the CSC to allocate IP addresses to provisioned processing resources or storage resources with a dynamic or static method. | – 9.5 Interoperability testing of IP address allocation between the CSC and CSP | +| 41 | | – The IaaS CSP can optionally provide network address translation (NAT). | – 9.3 Interoperability testing of network address translation between the CSC and CSP | + +**Table III.1 – Alignment analysis with functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513]** + +| | | Functional requirements in [ITU-T Y.3513] | Test objects in this Recommendation | +|----|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 42 | 7.3.4 Network isolation | – It is required that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with isolated tenants' networks. | – 9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP | +| 43 | | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to isolated tenants' networks, such as create, query and release. | – 9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP | +| 44 | 7.3.5 Virtual Networking | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP manages virtual networking to provide network connectivity amongst various processing and storage resources. | – 9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP | +| 45 | 7.3.6 Load balance | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP optimizes infrastructure resources utilization by providing load balance related functions, such as throughput, response time, to avoid overload of any one of the infrastructure resources. | – 9.7 Interoperability testing of load balance between the CSC and CSP | +| 46 | | – The IaaS CSP can optionally provide multipath routing to achieve an optimized traffic management (e.g., to improve network utilization, to guarantee QoS at network congestion or fault). | – 9.9 Interoperability testing of multipath routing between the CSC and CSP | +| 47 | 7.3.7 Firewall | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP delivers a physical or virtual firewall to the CSC. | – 9.8 Interoperability testing of firewall between the CSC and CSP | +| 48 | 7.3.8 Gateway | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides necessary network interworking functions so that the CSC uses provisioned infrastructure resources as if they are at the CSC's premises. | – 9.4 Interoperability testing of network isolation between the CSC and CSP | +| 49 | 7.3.9 Network configuration | – It is recommended that the IaaS CSP provides the CSC with operations handling mechanisms related to the network configurations according to the objectives of the SLA. | See other network related testing objects:
– 9.5 Interoperability testing of IP address allocation between the CSC and CSP
– 9.2 Interoperability testing of network QoS between the CSC and CSP
– 9.3 Interoperability testing of network address translation between the CSC and CSP | + +## Bibliography + +- [b-ETSI GS NFV-TST 002 V1.1] ETSI GS NFV-TST 002 V1.1 (2016), *Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV); Testing Methodology; Report on NFV Interoperability Testing Methodology.* + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a574bf4c7fd169a72a97de0395e1970ee6f7092 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5d863c71623a2b5a933b672e32a1463a7461603fd81d81e68543e5d90adf3b80 +size 7132 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a6adc48e5d36b2489277a0a723bd466d0d3bcae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a774f5f4bdc1e7dfdd051015b1f99c2710600cb5fca1587e5e6cbdd66fd2be53 +size 56354 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8233b20d5e0d9c3362d00a8918ae81c666475c5e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5593afc05070c79a574c6aa4bdaf6e364b5436c6aded3e2566996c0c51ace172 +size 57829 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f73b48f178a94a5b9be0d847d6d799a2adc8fd23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c2fa864f70eec1404a2a388646c70070c3f2503393c96f68302caf758b379511 +size 58493 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf6f63f3e757ec4c4d6770df55977ecdb0da0ea9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2c97fd56d52008d51ebb60da79ffc0a13a2cc72da02d208ed00c0f3d92131dce +size 60433 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c1bd86bffefcc1f6fcc64f6544da1106b2850d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4047-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,638 @@ + + +# Recommendation**ITU-T Q.4047 (06/2024)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +Testing specifications – Testing specifications for Cloud computing + +--- + +### **Interoperability testing between software-defined networking (SDN) and hypervisor-based computing virtualization** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font superimposed on the globe. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| Testing specifications for next generation networks | Q.3900-Q.3999 | +| Testing specifications for SIP-IMS | Q.4000-Q.4039 | +| Testing specifications for Cloud computing | Q.4040-Q.4059 | +| Testing specifications for IMT-2020 and IoT | Q.4060-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS | Q.4160-Q.4179 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4047 + +# Interoperability testing between software-defined networking (SDN) and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4047 specifies the interoperability testing between software-defined networking (SDN) and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. This Recommendation introduces the framework for interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization, which includes the target areas, components and interoperability in different scenarios. The corresponding requirements and the data model framework which should be considered during the interoperability testing between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are then presented. Test cases of interoperability testing between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are provided in Appendix I, which describe the involved test procedures. + +## History \* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4047 | 2024-06-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/15958 | + +## Keywords + +Hypervisor-based computing virtualization, interoperability testing, SDN. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, and information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2024 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 Reference ..... | 1 | +| 3 Definition..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Framework for interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization ..... | 3 | +| 6.1 Target areas for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization..... | 3 | +| 6.2 Scenario 1: "VM NVE" ..... | 4 | +| 6.3 Scenario 2: "vSwitch NVE" ..... | 5 | +| 6.4 Scenario 3: "intelligent NIC NVE" ..... | 6 | +| 6.5 Scenario 4: "ToR NVE" ..... | 7 | +| 7 IOPT requirements between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization .... | 8 | +| 7.1 IOPT requirements for interface compatibility aspect ..... | 8 | +| 7.2 IOPT requirements for VM lifecycle management aspect..... | 8 | +| 7.3 IOPT requirements for network connectivity aspect..... | 9 | +| 8 Data model framework considered during SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT ..... | 9 | +| 8.1 Resource data model description..... | 9 | +| 8.2 Operations of the resource data models..... | 10 | +| Appendix I – Test cases of IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization ..... | 12 | +| I.1 Test case template..... | 12 | +| I.2 Test cases for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization..... | 13 | + + + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4047 + +# Interoperability testing between software-defined networking (SDN) and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +# 1 Scope + +The scope of this Recommendation consists of: + +- Framework for interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. +- Interoperability testing (IOPT) requirements between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. +- Data model framework considered during SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT. +- Test cases of SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT. + +# 2 Reference + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T Y.3300] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3300 (2014), *Framework of software-defined networking*. +- [ITU-T Y.3502] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3502 (2014), *Information technology – Cloud computing – Reference architecture*. +- [ITU-T Q.4040] Recommendation ITU-T Q.4040 (2016), *The framework and overview of cloud computing interoperability testing*. + +## 3 Definition + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +- 3.1.1 interoperability** [b-ITU-T Y.101]: The ability of two or more systems or applications to exchange information and to mutually use the information that has been exchanged. +- 3.1.2 interoperability testing** [b-ITU-T Y.4500.15]: Activity of proving that end-to-end functionality between (at least) two devices is as required by the base standard(s) on which those devices are based. +- 3.1.3 hypervisor** [b-ITU-T Y.3510]: A type of system software that allows multiple operating systems to share a single hardware host. +- 3.1.4 virtual switch** [b-ITU-T Q.4043]: Resource abstraction and control function abstracting physical network resources to offer virtual network capabilities. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following term: + +**3.2.1 network virtualization edge (NVE):** A network entity that sits at the edge of an underlay network and implements L2 and/or L3 network virtualization functions. + +NOTE – Definition adapted from [b-IETF RFC 7365]. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|---------|------------------------------------| +| API | Application Programming Interface | +| CME | Compute Management Entity | +| CSP | Cloud Service Provider | +| HM | Hypervisor Manager | +| HTTP | Hyper Text Transfer Protocol | +| IaaS | Infrastructure as a Service | +| IOPT | Interoperability Testing | +| L2 | Layer 2 | +| L3 | Layer 3 | +| MAC | Media Access Control | +| NFV | Network Function Virtualization | +| NIC | Network Interface Card | +| NME | Network Management Entity | +| NVE | Network Virtualization Edge | +| QinQ | 802.1Q-in-802.1Q | +| SDN | Software-Defined Networking | +| SDNC | SDN Controller | +| ToR | Top of Rack | +| VIM | Virtualized Infrastructure Manager | +| VLAN | Virtual Local Area Network | +| VM | Virtual Machine | +| vNIC | Virtual Network Interface Card | +| vSwitch | Virtual Switch | +| VXLAN | Virtual Extensible LAN | +| WAN | Wide Area Network | + +# 5 Conventions + +In this Recommendation: + +The keywords "is required" indicate a requirement which must be strictly followed and from which no deviation is permitted if conformance to this Recommendation is to be claimed. + +The keywords "is recommended" indicate a requirement which is recommended but which is not absolutely required. Thus, this requirement need not be present to claim conformance. + +# 6 Framework for interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +According to [ITU-T Y.3502], the resource abstraction and control function provides access to the physical computing resources through software abstraction. Resource abstraction needs to ensure efficient, secure and reliable usage of the underlying infrastructure. Software-defined networking (SDN) [ITU-T Y.3300] and hypervisor-based computing virtualization both belong to the resource abstraction and control function. + +SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are capabilities of infrastructure as a service (IaaS). Interoperability testing (IOPT) in different cloud capabilities types is different. According to [ITU-T Q.4040], there are three major IOPT scenarios: infrastructure capabilities type IOPT, platform capabilities type IOPT, and application capabilities type IOPT. IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization should be considered as an infrastructure capabilities type IOPT. + +Hypervisor-based computing virtualization which is composed of a hypervisor, hypervisor manager (HM), and a virtual switch (vSwitch), abstracts physical compute resources to enable a cloud service provider (CSP) to offer virtualized compute resources. SDN which is composed of a SDN controller and SDN network virtualization edge (NVE), abstracts physical network resources to enable the CSP to offer virtual network connectivity for virtual machines (VMs) or containers. Capabilities of SDN include rapid elasticity, resource pooling and on-demand self-service of network. + +IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization is to verify that SDN can interact with hypervisor-based computing virtualization as expected. The user can initiate requests related to the VM life cycle, including VM creation, startup, shutdown, deletion, migration, adding virtual network interface cards (vNIC) or deleting vNIC, and so on. The IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization can ensure that the requests receive corresponding interaction results. Meanwhile, a virtualized infrastructure manager (VIM) including compute management entities (CMEs) and network management entities (NMEs) also play an indispensable role in the IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. + +NOTE – The SDN mentioned in this Recommendation refers to SDN in the cloud computing data center, excluding wide area networks (WANs), the access networks and other scenarios. + +## 6.1 Target areas for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +According to the way SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization works, there are 10 target areas that need to be considered in SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT as follows: + +- Target area 1: "**CME-NME**", dealing with interaction between compute management entity and network management entity; +- Target area 2: "**SDNC-NME**", dealing with interaction between SDN controller and network management entity; +- Target area 3: "**CME-HM**", dealing with interaction between compute management entity and hypervisor manager; +- Target area 4: "**SDNC-VM**", dealing with interaction between SDN controller and VM; +- Target area 5: "**NVE-vSwitch**", dealing with interaction between SDN NVE and virtual switch; +- Target area 6: "**NVE – VM**", dealing with interaction between SDN NVE and VM; +- Target area 7: "**SDNC-vSwitch**", dealing with interaction between SDN controller and virtual switch; + +- Target area 8: "**SDNC-NIC**", dealing with interaction between SDN controller and intelligent network interface card (NIC); +- Target area 9: "**NVE-Hypervisor**", dealing with interaction between SDN NVE and hypervisor; +- Target area 10: "**SDNC-ToR**", dealing with interaction between SDN controller and top of rack (ToR). + +Different implementation scenarios of SDN NVE will lead to different target areas that need to be considered in SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT. Referring to the form of NVE, four scenarios can be respectively named as virtual machine (VM) NVE, vSwitch NVE, intelligent network interface card (NIC) NVE and ToR NVE. + +- Scenario 1: "**VM NVE**", deploying the NVE as a VM on hypervisor-based computing virtualization. +- Scenario 2: "**vSwitch NVE**", deploying the NVE in the form of vSwitch on the hypervisor-based computing virtualization, which merges the original functions of vSwitch. +- Scenario 3: "**intelligent NIC NVE**", realizing overlay encapsulation/decapsulation packet forwarding services of NVE by the physical network card of the host where the hypervisor-based computing virtualization is located. +- Scenario 4: "**ToR NVE**", realizing the function of NVE on ToR corresponding to the host where the hypervisor-based computing virtualization is located. + +Clauses 6.2 to 6.5 describe the four scenarios and their corresponding IOPT target areas respectively. + +## 6.2 Scenario 1: "VM NVE" + +As shown in the Figure 6-1, NVE is deployed in hypervisor-based computing virtualization in the form of a VM, and a vSwitch directs the traffic of VMs to NVE to realize overlay encapsulation/decapsulation packet forwarding services. The interactions between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are as follows: + +- **CME**: deploys an event processing module and its virtualization event interface. The CME responds to the VM life cycle related requests and sends the VM life cycle related requests to the hypervisor manager (HM) (which is the virtualization management node). Through a virtualization event interface of the virtualization event processing module, the CME retrieves the VM life cycle related operational information reported by HM. +- **HM**: calls the hypervisor to perform the user requested VM life cycle related operations on the specific physical host. After the operation, HM calls the virtualization event interface of the virtualization event processing module, and reports the VM life cycle related operation results and corresponding parameter information to the CME. +- **SDNC**: subscribes events of the VM life cycle related operation information from the virtualization event processing module of CME and updates the network configuration of the SDN NVE according to the operation information. + +In scenario 1, the IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization involves target areas 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. + +![Figure 6-1: Scenario 1: 'virtual machine NVE'. This diagram illustrates the network architecture for Scenario 1. At the top, a VIM (Virtual Infrastructure Manager) box contains CME (Cloud Management Element) and NME (Network Management Element). Below this, an HM (Host Manager) box is connected to the CME. To the right, an SDNC (SDN Controller) box is connected to the NME. The central part of the diagram shows a 'Physical host' containing 'Computing virtualization', which in turn contains a 'Hypervisor'. The Hypervisor manages three VMs (Virtual Machines) and an NVE/VM. A 'vSwitch' is shown above the VMs, connected to a 'NIC' (Network Interface Card). The vSwitch is connected to the NVE/VM. The HM is connected to the vSwitch. The SDNC is connected to the NVE/VM. Five target areas are indicated by numbered lines: 1. CME-NME target area (between CME and NME), 2. SDNC-NME target area (between SDNC and NME), 3. CME-HM target area (between CME and HM), 4. SDNC-VM target area (between SDNC and VM), and 5. NVE-vSwitch target area (between NVE/VM and vSwitch). The diagram is labeled Q.4047(24) at the bottom right.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +Figure 6-1: Scenario 1: 'virtual machine NVE'. This diagram illustrates the network architecture for Scenario 1. At the top, a VIM (Virtual Infrastructure Manager) box contains CME (Cloud Management Element) and NME (Network Management Element). Below this, an HM (Host Manager) box is connected to the CME. To the right, an SDNC (SDN Controller) box is connected to the NME. The central part of the diagram shows a 'Physical host' containing 'Computing virtualization', which in turn contains a 'Hypervisor'. The Hypervisor manages three VMs (Virtual Machines) and an NVE/VM. A 'vSwitch' is shown above the VMs, connected to a 'NIC' (Network Interface Card). The vSwitch is connected to the NVE/VM. The HM is connected to the vSwitch. The SDNC is connected to the NVE/VM. Five target areas are indicated by numbered lines: 1. CME-NME target area (between CME and NME), 2. SDNC-NME target area (between SDNC and NME), 3. CME-HM target area (between CME and HM), 4. SDNC-VM target area (between SDNC and VM), and 5. NVE-vSwitch target area (between NVE/VM and vSwitch). The diagram is labeled Q.4047(24) at the bottom right. + +**Figure 6-1 – Scenario 1: "virtual machine NVE"** + +## 6.3 Scenario 2: "vSwitch NVE" + +As shown in the Figure 6-2, NVE is embedded into vSwitch to achieve overlay encapsulation/decapsulation packet forwarding services. The interactions between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are as follows: + +- **vSwitch NVE:** vSwitch NVE interacts with hypervisor for data forwarding, and provides network connection for VMs in or between hosts instead of vSwitch. +- **VIM:** including CME and NME, standardize the interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization in different VM lifecycle management services. The CME responds to the VM life cycle related requests and sends the VM life cycle related requests to the HM. NME interacts with the HM to perform NIC related operations, including vNIC addition/deletion, and so on. +- **hypervisor:** receives instructions from HM to perform the VM life cycle related operations on the specific physical host. +- **SDNC:** subscribes events of the VM life cycle related operation information from CME, and interacts with NME to receive NIC operation commands, call the corresponding vSwitch to complete vNIC addition/deletion operations, and synchronize network configuration information with NME. + +In scenario 2, the IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization involve target areas 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 9. + +![Diagram of Scenario 2: 'vSwitch NVE' showing network architecture layers and target areas.](d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the network architecture for Scenario 2: "vSwitch NVE". At the top, a box contains "VIM", "CME", and "NME". Below this, "HM" (Host Manager) and "SDNC" (SDN Controller) are shown. The "SDNC" is connected to a box containing "NIC" (Network Interface Card) and "NVE/vSwitch". Below "NVE/vSwitch" are three "VM" (Virtual Machine) boxes, which are managed by a "Hypervisor". The "Hypervisor" runs on "Computing virtualization", which is on top of the "Physical host". + +Target areas are indicated by numbered labels and blue lines pointing to specific components: + +- 1. CME-NME target area: Points to the connection between CME and NME. +- 2. SDNC-NME target area: Points to the connection between SDNC and NME. +- 3. CME-HM target area: Points to the connection between CME and HM. +- 6. NVE-VM target area: Points to the connection between NVE/vSwitch and the VMs. +- 7. SDNC-vSwitch target area: Points to the connection between SDNC and NVE/vSwitch. +- 9. NVE-Hypervisor target area: Points to the connection between NVE/vSwitch and the Hypervisor. + +Reference number Q.4047(24) is shown in the bottom right of the diagram. + +Diagram of Scenario 2: 'vSwitch NVE' showing network architecture layers and target areas. + +**Figure 6-2 – Scenario 2: "vSwitch NVE"** + +## 6.4 Scenario 3: "intelligent NIC NVE" + +As shown in the Figure 6-3, SDN NVE is deployed in the intelligent NIC, the interactions between SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are as follows: + +- **Intelligent NIC**, deploying SDN NVE and its corresponding kernel dependencies, runnable software library and standard interface library. Intelligent NIC NVE can perform the functions of the regular NIC, and receive the related operation commands of the NIC from the SDNC, and synchronize network configuration information to hypervisor after completing those operations. + +NOTE – The standard interface library of SDN NVE includes standard interface and interface plug-ins, the standard interface defines the operation process and parameters between the vNIC of VM and the virtual port of NVE. The interface plug-ins inherit from the standard interfaces of SDN NVE, and realize the conversion between the virtual port of NVE and the standard interface, which are updated with the version of the virtual port of NVE. + +- **Hypervisor**, includes its corresponding kernel dependencies and runnable software library, receives instructions from HM to perform the VM life cycle related operations on the specific physical host, and synchronizes network configuration information with intelligent NIC. +- **VIM**: as in scenario 2, the CME responds to the VM life cycle related requests and sends the VM life cycle related requests to the HM. NME interacts with the HM to perform NIC related operations, including vNIC addition/deletion, and so on. + +In scenario 3, the IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization involve target areas 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9. + +![Figure 6-3: Scenario 3: 'intelligent NIC NVE' diagram. The diagram shows a hierarchical network architecture. At the top, a box contains 'VIM', 'CME', and 'NME'. 'CME' is connected to 'HM' (Host Manager) on the left and 'SDNC' (SDN Controller) on the right. 'NME' is connected to 'SDNC'. Below 'SDNC' is 'NVE/NIC'. At the bottom is a 'Physical host' containing 'Computing virtualization', 'Hypervisor', and three 'VM' boxes. 'NVE/NIC' is connected to the 'Hypervisor'. Numbered target areas are indicated by blue lines: 1. CME-NME target area (between CME and NME), 2. SDNC-NME target area (between SDNC and NME), 3. CME-HM target area (between CME and HM), 6. NVE-VM target area (between NVE/NIC and VMs), 8. SDNC-NIC target area (between SDNC and NVE/NIC), and 9. NVE-Hypervisor target area (between NVE/NIC and Hypervisor). A label 'Q.4047(24)' is in the bottom right corner of the diagram.](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +Figure 6-3: Scenario 3: 'intelligent NIC NVE' diagram. The diagram shows a hierarchical network architecture. At the top, a box contains 'VIM', 'CME', and 'NME'. 'CME' is connected to 'HM' (Host Manager) on the left and 'SDNC' (SDN Controller) on the right. 'NME' is connected to 'SDNC'. Below 'SDNC' is 'NVE/NIC'. At the bottom is a 'Physical host' containing 'Computing virtualization', 'Hypervisor', and three 'VM' boxes. 'NVE/NIC' is connected to the 'Hypervisor'. Numbered target areas are indicated by blue lines: 1. CME-NME target area (between CME and NME), 2. SDNC-NME target area (between SDNC and NME), 3. CME-HM target area (between CME and HM), 6. NVE-VM target area (between NVE/NIC and VMs), 8. SDNC-NIC target area (between SDNC and NVE/NIC), and 9. NVE-Hypervisor target area (between NVE/NIC and Hypervisor). A label 'Q.4047(24)' is in the bottom right corner of the diagram. + +**Figure 6-3 – Scenario 3: "intelligent NIC NVE"** + +## 6.5 Scenario 4: "ToR NVE" + +As shown in Figure 6-4, ToR can also conduct the overlay encapsulation/decapsulation packet forwarding services which is the function of NVE, the interactions between SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are as follows: + +The interactions between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization are as follows: + +- **VIM:** achieves the interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization by port binding and as in scenario 2, The CME responds to the VM life cycle related requests and sends the VM life cycle related requests to the HM. NME interacts with the HM to perform NIC related operations, including vNIC addition/deletion, and so on. + +NOTE – Port binding schemes are a typical method to achieve the interoperability. Hierarchical port binding allows NME to collaborate with SDN and hypervisor to complete port binding operations, configure the virtual local area network (VLAN) network on vSwitch, and configure corresponding tunnel network on TOR NVE. + +- **ToR NVE:** receives data frames from hypervisor, deletes VLAN tags from the data frames based on the mapping between VLAN and tunnel ID, encapsulates the data frames as corresponding tunnel messages, and forwards data frames from virtual ports based on address information in data frames; +- **SDNC:** configures the correct tunnel ID for ToR NVE which should be consistent with the values of the application programming interface (API) during VM lifecycle management services. + +In scenario 4, the IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization involves target areas 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10. + +![Diagram of Scenario 4: 'ToR NVE' showing network architecture with target areas 1, 2, 3, and 10.](4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a network architecture for Scenario 4: "ToR NVE". At the top, a box labeled "VIM" contains two sub-components: "CME" and "NME". Below this, a box labeled "NVE/ToR" is connected to the "VIM" box. To the left of "NVE/ToR" is a box labeled "HM", and to the right is a box labeled "SDNC". Below "NVE/ToR" is a box labeled "NIC". Below "NIC" is a large box labeled "Physical host". Inside the "Physical host" box, from top to bottom, are: a box labeled "vSwitch", three boxes labeled "VM", a box labeled "Hypervisor", and a box labeled "Computing virtualization". The "vSwitch" is connected to the "NIC" and the three "VM" boxes. The "Hypervisor" is connected to the "vSwitch" and the "Computing virtualization" box. The "Computing virtualization" box is connected to the "Physical host" box. The "HM" box is connected to the "NIC" box. The "SDNC" box is connected to the "NVE/ToR" box and the "NIC" box. Four target areas are indicated by blue lines and numbers: 1. CME-NME target area (pointing to the CME and NME components), 2. SDNC-NME target area (pointing to the SDNC and NME components), 3. CME-HM target area (pointing to the CME and HM components), and 10. SDNC-ToR target area (pointing to the SDNC and NVE/ToR components). The text "Q.4047(24)" is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Diagram of Scenario 4: 'ToR NVE' showing network architecture with target areas 1, 2, 3, and 10. + +**Figure 6-4 – Scenario 4: "ToR NVE"** + +# 7 IOPT requirements between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +Clauses 7.1 to 7.3 provide the IOPT requirements between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization in different categories. + +## 7.1 IOPT requirements for interface compatibility aspect + +The interface compatibility of the interaction provides consistent interaction operations and interface types. Verification of interface compatibility capabilities between SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization should be considered in target areas 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9. + +- **Permission setting:** It is recommended that computing virtualization opens permission of hypervisor to deploy SDN NVE. +- **Version compatibility:** It is recommended that the operating system versions of the hypervisor-based computing virtualization are compatible with SDN NVE. It is also recommended that the SDN be configured with the compute driver version and storage driver versions which are required by the VIM. + +Interface compatibility is a prerequisite for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization, so all test cases in clause I.2 can be used to test these requirements. + +## 7.2 IOPT requirements for VM lifecycle management aspect + +The capabilities of VM lifecycle management include VM creation, deletion, migration, adding/deleting vNIC, and so on. Verification of VM lifecycle management capabilities between SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization should be considered in target areas 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10. + +- **Data frame forwarding:** It is required that SDN NVE, VIM and hypervisor-based computing virtualization provide a data frame forwarding function, which forwards data frames from virtual ports based on address information in data frames. The corresponding test case can be found in clause I.2.1. + +- **Interface attribute extension:** It is required that SDN NVE and VIM process and fill in interface attributes of VM lifecycle management according to interface attribute conventions to ensure the consistency of interaction. The corresponding test case can be found in clause I.2.2. + +## 7.3 IOPT requirements for network connectivity aspect + +The capabilities of network connectivity include VLAN, transport protocol and 802.1Q-in-802.1Q (QinQ). Verification of network connectivity capabilities should be considered in target areas 1, 5, 6 and 9. + +- **VLAN:** It is required that vSwitch/NVE provides the VLAN function in order to create partitioned and isolated broadcast domains in a computer network at the data link layer. The corresponding test case can be found in clause I.2.3. +- **Transport protocol:** It is required that SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization support the hyper text transfer protocol (HTTP) protocol. The corresponding test case can be found in clause I.2.4. +- **QinQ:** It is recommended that vSwitch/NVE support encapsulating the private network VLAN tag in the public network VLAN so that the packet can be forwarded with two VLAN tags [b-IEEE Std 802.1q]. The corresponding test case can be found in clause I.2.5. + +# 8 Data model framework considered during SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization IOPT + +Clauses 8.1 to 8.2 provide the resource data models and corresponding operations that need to be considered in IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. + +The elements listed in Table 8-1 and Table 8-2 could be used as the request and response parameters of the operations listed in Table 8-3 and Table 8-4. + +## 8.1 Resource data model description + +The data models include VM and vNIC resource data models. + +The data model description for VM resource is shown in Table 8-1. + +**Table 8-1 – Data model description for VM resource** + +| Element | Type | Necessity | Description | +|--------------|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| VmName | String | Mandatory | Name of VM. | +| VmID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of VM. | +| VmStatus | String | Mandatory | Status of VM, including running, stop, paused, migration, etc. | +| InstanceName | String | Optional | Name of VM registered on VIM. | +| InstanceID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of VM registered on VIM. | +| HostName | String | Optional | Name of host where the VM is located. | +| HostID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of host where the VM is located. SDN can refer to this value to match the corresponding hypervisor. | +| vNICList | Array | Mandatory | List of vNIC. More description can be found in the vNIC resource data model description (Table 8-2). | + +The data model description for vNIC resource is shown in Table 8-2. + +**Table 8-2 – Data model description for vNIC resource** + +| Element | Type | Necessity | Description | +|-----------------|---------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| vNICName | String | Mandatory | Name of vNIC. | +| vNICID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of vNIC. | +| vNICType | String | Mandatory | Type of vNIC, including normal, direct, bare-metal, direct-physical, virtio-forward and smart-nic, etc. The default value is normal. | +| VIFType | String | Optional | Type of VIF which corresponding to the vNIC. In "vSwitch NVE" scenario, SDNC updates its attributes with the network configuration of the SDN NVE corresponding to VM lifecycle management. | +| PortGroupName | String | Optional | Name of port group. | +| PortGroupID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of port group. | +| PortName | String | Optional | Name of port. | +| PortID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of port. | +| NetworkName | String | Optional | Name of network. | +| NetworkID | String | Mandatory | Unique identification of network. | +| MACID | String | Mandatory | MAC address. | +| PortGroupVLANID | Integer | Mandatory | VLAN ID of port group. | +| vNICIP | String | Mandatory | IP address of vNIC. | + +## 8.2 Operations of the resource data models + +The operations of resource data models include VM and vNIC resource data models related operations. + +Table 8-3 provides the operations of the VM resource data model. + +**Table 8-3 – Operations of the VM resource data model** + +| No | Operation | HTTP Action | Description | +|----|-------------|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | List VMs | GET | The information of all the VMs is listed. | +| 2 | Create VM | POST | One VM is created. | +| 3 | Shutdown VM | PUT | The specific VM is shutdown. | +| 4 | Startup VM | PUT | The specific VM is started. | +| 5 | Delete VM | DELETE | The specific VM is deleted. | +| 6 | Migrate VM | PUT | The specific VM is migrated. | +| 7 | Suspend VM | PUT | The specific VM is suspended. | +| 8 | Snapshot VM | PUT | The status of the specific VM is preserved as a snapshot. | + +Table 8-4 provides the operations of the vNIC resource data model. + +**Table 8-4 – Operations of the vNIC resource data model** + +| No | Operation | HTTP Action | Description | +|-----------|------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 | Add vNIC | POST | The specific vNIC of VM is added in specific port of vSwitch/NVE. | +| 2 | Delete vNIC | DELETE | The specific vNIC of VM is removed from specific port of vSwitch/NVE. | + +# Appendix I + +## Test cases of IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +This appendix provides test cases for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. + +## I.1 Test case template + +Table I.1 provides a test case template to describe IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization. The test case template is designed with reference to relevant technical specifications. As shown in the table, an interoperability test case consists of test purpose, reference, test procedures, expected results and test verdict. + +- The test purpose specifies which test case to verify. +- The reference of the test case provides a list of references to the base specification clause(s), use case(s), requirement(s), etc. They are either used in the test or define the functionality being tested. +- The test sequences provide the stimuli required to perform the test. A stimulus corresponds to an event, it triggers a specific action on the object under test. There is no need to provide a result for a stimulus step. +- Expected results consist of check steps and are used to review whether the test phenomena of the test object are as expected. A result must be provided for every check step. If the object under test behaves as described in the description of the check step, the result should be recorded as OK, otherwise the result should be recorded as failed. +- The notes column can record any special conditions that occurred during the test which should be valued before test verdict. +- For every test case, the test verdict should be provided based on the result(s) of the check step(s) to indicate whether the test is passed, failed or partly passed. + +**Table I.1 – Test case template** + +| Test description of interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| Test purpose | A concise summary of the test reflecting its purpose and allowing readers to easily distinguish this test from any other test in the document. | | | | +| Reference | List of references to the base specification clause(s), requirement(s), etc. They are either used in the test or define the functionality being tested. | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | A stimulus corresponds to an event, it triggers a specific action on the object under test. | | +| Expected results | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Check | A check is used to review whether the test phenomena of the test object are as expected. A result must be provided for every check step. If the object under test behaves as described in the description of the check step, the result should be recorded as OK, otherwise the result should be recorded as failed. | A result must be provided for every check step. | + +**Table I.1 – Test case template** + +| Test description of interoperability between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Notes | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | + +## **I.2 Test cases for IOPT between SDN and hypervisor-based computing virtualization** + +### **I.2.1 Test case: Data frame forwarding** + +Table I.2 shows the test case for data frame forwarding. + +**Table I.2 – Test case: Data frame forwarding** + +| Data frame forwarding test description | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that the SDN NVE, VIM and hypervisor-based computing virtualization provide the data frame forwarding function, which forwards data frames from virtual ports base on address information in data frames. | | | | +| Reference | Clause 7.2 | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | Login to the configuration interface of VIM. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | Create VM1 and VM2 in different hosts under the same subnet, configure VM1 with IP1 and VM2 with IP2, which should produce expected result1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | From VM1 ping IP2 and from VM2 ping IP1, which should produce expected result2. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | View the configuration information of the VMs on the SDN controller and VIM respectively, which should produce expected result3. | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | Perform the operations in Table 8-3 and Table 8-4 of clause 8 on VMs, including shutdown, startup, deletion, suspension, adding/deleting vNIC, etc. | | +| Expected results | 6 | Stimulus | View the VM's status on the SDN controller and VIM respectively, which should produce expected result4. | | +| | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Check | The VMs are successfully created. | | +| | 2 | Check | VM1 and VM2 can ping each other. | | +| | 3 | Check | The configuration information of VMs seen on the SDN controller and VIM is consistent, including VmName, VmID, InstanceID, HostID, vNICList and other parameters in Table 8-3 and Table 8-4. | | +| | 4 | Check | The VM's status seen on the SDN controller and VIM is consistent, including stop, running, paused, etc. | | + +**Table I.2 – Test case: Data frame forwarding** + +| Data frame forwarding test description | | +|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Notes | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | + +#### **I.2.2 Test case: Interface attribute extension** + +Table I.3 shows the test case for interface attribute extension. + +**Table I.3 – Test case: Interface attribute extension** + +| Interface attribute extension test description | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that SDN NVE and VIM process and fill in interface attributes corresponding to VM lifecycle management, which can ensure the consistency of interaction within special interface attribute conventions. | | | | +| Reference | Clause 7.2 | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | Login to the configuration interface of VIM. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | Create network1 and create port1 in network1, which should produce expected result1. | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | Create VM1 under network1, attach port1 to VM1, which should produce expected result2 and result3. | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | View the network configuration information of VM1 on the SDN controller and VIM respectively, which should produce expected result4. | | +| Expected results | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Check | The network and port are successfully created. | | +| | 2 | Check | The VM is successfully created. | | +| | 3 | Check | The port is successfully attached. | | +| | 4 | Check | The network configuration information of VMs seen on the SDN controller and VIM is consistent, including vNICType, PortGroupID, and other parameters in Table 8-2. | | +| Notes | This test case can be considered together with VLAN, transport protocol test cases, see clauses I.2.3 and I.2.4. | | | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | | | | + +#### I.2.3 Test case: VLAN + +Table I.4 shows the test case for VLAN. + +**Table I.4 – Test case: VLAN** + +| VLAN test description | | | | | +|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that vSwitch/NVE provides VLAN function in order to create partitioned and isolated broadcast domain in a computer network at the data link layer. | | | | +| Reference | Clause 7.3 | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | Login to the configuration interface of VIM. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | Create VM1 and configure VM1 with IP1, which should produce expected result1. | | +| Expected results | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Check | The VM is successfully created. | | +| | 2 | Check | The PortGroupVLANID of VM1 seen on the SDN controller and VIM is consistent. | | +| Notes | | | | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | | | | + +#### I.2.4 Test case: Transport protocol + +Table I.5 shows the test case for transport protocol. + +**Table I.5 – Test case: Transport protocol** + +| Transport protocol test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| Test purpose | To verify that SDN NVE and hypervisor-based computing virtualization support the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP) protocol, which can be used for operations of the resource data models registration / deregistration and notification. | | | | +| Reference | Clause 7.3 | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | Login to the testing tool which can perform HTTP message testing. | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | Send HTTP messages to hypervisor-based computing virtualization refer to the Data model description and operations in clause 8, which should produce expected result1. | | +| Expected results | Step | Type | Description | Result | +| | 1 | Check | The testing tool can receive the corresponding correct response message | | + +**Table I.5 – Test case: Transport protocol** + +| Transport protocol test description | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| | 2 | Check | The configuration information of VMs seen on the SDN controller and VIM is consistent, including VmName, VmID, InstanceID, HostID, vNICList, etc. | | +| Notes | | | | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | | | | + +#### 1.2.5 Test case: QinQ + +Table I.6 shows the test case for QinQ. + +**Table I.6 – Test case: QinQ** + +| QinQ test description | | | | | | | +|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--|--| +| Test purpose | To verify that vSwitch/NVE support encapsulating the private network VLAN tag in the public network VLAN so that the packet can be forwarded with two VLAN tags [b-IEEE Std 802.1q]. | | | | | | +| Reference | Clause 7.3 | | | | | | +| Test procedures | Step | Type | Description | | | | +| | 1 | Stimulus | Login to the configuration interface of vSwitch. | | | | +| | 2 | Stimulus | Create VLAN1, add virtual port1 in VLAN1. Configure virtual port1 to support QinQ. | | | | +| | 3 | Stimulus | Create virtual port2 inVLAN1 on another host. | | | | +| | 4 | Stimulus | Login to the configuration interface of VIM. | | | | +| | 5 | Stimulus | Create VM1 and connect it to virtual port1, create VM2 and connect it to virtual port2, which should produce expected result1. | | | | +| | 6 | Stimulus | From VM1, using virtual instrumentation, send packet encapsulated with VLAN2 header to VM2. Capture packet between the hosts, which should produce expected result2. | | | | +| Expected results | Step | Type | Description | Result | | | +| | 1 | Check | The VMs are successfully created. | | | | +| | 2 | Check | The captured packet has 2 VLAN tags. The inner tag VLAN2 is encapsulated in the outer tag VLAN1. | | | | +| Notes | | | | | | | +| Test verdict | If all checks described in the test case are successful, it is deemed successfully terminated. If at least one check is successful but at least one check is failed, the test is deemed partially passed. If no checks are successful, the test is deemed failed. | | | | | | + +## Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T Q.4043] Recommendation ITU-T Q.4043 (2019), *Interoperability testing requirements of a virtual switch.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.101] Recommendation ITU-T Y.101 (2000), *Global Information Infrastructure terminology: Terms and definitions.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.3510] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3510 (2016), *Cloud computing infrastructure requirements.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.4500.15] Recommendation ITU-T Y.4500.15/Q.3955 (2018), *oneM2M – Testing framework.* +- [b-IEEE Std 802.1q] IEEE Std 802.1q (2022), *802.1Q – Virtual LANs.* +- [b-IETF RFC 7365] IETF RFC 7365(2014), *Framework for Data Center (DC) Network Virtualization.* + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7cdea168ce9f257fe8030a227e83bbaa8e6bd37 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2304a334ecb872810aa931b1144de0c9ee1b4f42337020f338b0497dd6910e77 +size 63925 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/7a0db9703b68b3d06cdaeefc084c0006_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/7a0db9703b68b3d06cdaeefc084c0006_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d1701c143e8ca17346eae5f0c5292e6d7af4c66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/7a0db9703b68b3d06cdaeefc084c0006_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:621d01ce4550c2c53eb20b6dd9b67038ca3fdc99a327cbf9c0a09fe456b3da75 +size 52093 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1af9f6ecf6b7e4f220c1227b7fc75eea2f2d3d66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ef3c3105cf20a754063eee9acdf56d9f6fff56c41f1b7abef05e75473649504c +size 4324 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7eafa15e6d57b769c7d90e4ffdf203cea82a28ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:101d6f961b9f526e45c30b96629cdd09dfff11cb4ab35a2c2023093cec2bac51 +size 50434 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba5c0ac8c2fd21dcd4726656f3608da5d4b13c4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5ac7c62bac6bcb6a293bde2b6c599f761da744f75fd1914e5280a7ce99881e51 +size 51701 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce286168c23135ca5efa6e7078506bbe19aa8788 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4065-202105-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.4065** + +(05/2021) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Testing specifications – Testing specifications for IMT-2020 +and IoT + +--- + +**Framework of model network for tactile Internet +testing** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4065 + +![ITU logo](84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a stylized globe with a satellite dish and the letters 'ITU' in blue. + +ITU logo + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| Testing specifications for next generation networks | Q.3900–Q.3999 | +| Testing specifications for SIP-IMS | Q.4000–Q.4039 | +| Testing specifications for Cloud computing | Q.4040–Q.4059 | +| Testing specifications for IMT-2020 and IoT | Q.4060–Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100–Q.4139 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050–Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4065 + +## Framework of model network for tactile Internet testing + +## Summary + +According to *ITU-T Technology Watch Report, The Tactile Internet* (2014), the character of the tactile Internet is defined as extremely low latency in combination with high availability, reliability and security. + +The existing telecommunication networks are mainly developed for distributing traditional voice, video and data services which parameters do not require extremely low latency. + +The services which are based on tactile Internet will require establishing new principles of data processing in current and future networks. Currently, most existing telecommunication networks do not allow operators to scale tactile Internet services and provide it to most of their customers. + +In this regard, a model network may become an operator's tool aimed at testing the tactile Internet services before the implementation on the live telecommunication network. + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4065 describes the architecture, scenarios, and key networks metrics for establishing model network for testing tactile Internet services. Specifically, the aim of a model network is to study the general principles of data generation for transmission of a tactile sensation through the telecommunication networks, including analysis of the network latency and other network performance parameters. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4065 | 2021-05-14 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/14617 | + +## Keywords + +Model network, tactile Internet, testing. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2021 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definition..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Architecture of model network for tactile Internet testing ..... | 2 | +| 7 Network parameters to test ..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Round-trip time (RTT) ..... | 3 | +| 7.2 Delays on each network segment ..... | 4 | +| 7.3 Data loss coefficient ..... | 5 | +| 8 Model network testing scenarios ..... | 5 | +| Appendix I – Use cases..... | 6 | +| I.1 Movement transmission test..... | 6 | +| I.2 Kinesthetic feedback test..... | 6 | +| I.3 Tactile feedback test..... | 6 | +| Bibliography..... | 7 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.4065 + +## Framework of model network for tactile Internet testing + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes an architecture, scenarios, and key network metrics for establishing a model network for testing tactile Internet services. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T G.671] Recommendation ITU-T G.671 (2019), *Transmission characteristics of optical components and subsystems*. +- [ITU-T Q.3901] Recommendation ITU-T Q.3901 (2008), *Testing topology for networks and services based on NGN technical means*. +- [ITU-T Y.1540] Recommendation ITU-T Y.1540 (2019), *Internet protocol data communication service – IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters*. +- [ITU-T Y.3300] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3300 (2014), *Framework of software-defined networking*. + +# 3 Definition + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +- 3.1.1 tactile Internet** [b-ITU-T TWR TI]: A concept on the Internet evolution that purports to bring a new dimension into the human-to-machine and human-to-human interactions by enabling haptic sensations. The main network characteristic of tactile Internet is an extremely low latency in combination with high availability, reliability and security. +- 3.1.2 software-defined networking** [ITU-T Y.3300]: A set of techniques that enables to directly program, orchestrate, control and manage network resources, which facilitates the design, delivery and operation of network services in a dynamic and scalable manner. +- 3.1.3 dense WDM (DWDM) device** [ITU-T G.671]: A class of WDM devices that have a channel spacing less than or equal to 1000 GHz. Devices within this class can cover one or more spectral bands. +- 3.1.4 model network** [ITU-T Q.3901]: A network which simulates the capabilities similar to those available in telecommunication networks; it has a similar architecture and functionality and uses the same telecommunication technical means. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|----------------------------------------| +| AR | Augmented Reality | +| DWDM | Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing | +| ICMP | Internet Control Message Protocol | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| RTT | Round trip time | +| SDN | Software-defined Network | +| TI | Tactile Internet | +| UDP | User Datagram Protocol | + +# 5 Conventions + +None. + +# 6 Architecture of model network for tactile Internet testing + +Before the tactile Internet (TI) services implementation, one of the main tasks is a detailed test of infrastructure acceptability. In providing the tactile Internet services, it must be taken into account that the round-trip delay must not exceed the value of 1 ms (according to the [b-ITU-T TWR TI]). In this regard it is rational to pre-test the infrastructure on the model network that will produce different interaction scenarios of the main components of this system. The model network for tactile Internet applications represents the prototype of the existing network that was built on appropriate hardware. By using this kind of network, it is possible to perform the complex testing of the investigated equipment in both normal operation mode and under the pressure. This allows evaluating of the characteristics with more quality and objectiveness as opposed to testing on the installation object. + +The model network structure for the tactile Internet applications testing is presented in Figure 1. + +![Figure 1: Model network structure for tactile Internet applications testing. The diagram shows a network architecture with five segments: Operator segment, SND segment, DWDM segment, SDN segment, and Operated segment. The Operator segment contains kinesthetic sensors and actuators. The SND segment includes a Controller and Programmable switches. The DWDM segment consists of two DWDM equipment units connected by a Backbone network. The SDN segment includes another Controller and Programmable switches. The Operated segment contains a Robotic arm. The Level of distribution and access is shown at both ends of the network.](e1a0d046fbe7f28f5e93a47091851747_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the model network structure for tactile Internet applications testing. It is divided into five segments: Operator segment, SND segment, DWDM segment, SDN segment, and Operated segment. The Operator segment on the left includes kinesthetic sensors and actuators. The SND segment contains a Controller and Programmable switches. The DWDM segment consists of two DWDM equipment units connected by a Backbone network. The SDN segment includes another Controller and Programmable switches. The Operated segment on the right contains a Robotic arm. The Level of distribution and access is shown at both ends of the network. The diagram is labeled with 'Q.4065(21)\_F01' in the bottom right corner. + +Figure 1: Model network structure for tactile Internet applications testing. The diagram shows a network architecture with five segments: Operator segment, SND segment, DWDM segment, SDN segment, and Operated segment. The Operator segment contains kinesthetic sensors and actuators. The SND segment includes a Controller and Programmable switches. The DWDM segment consists of two DWDM equipment units connected by a Backbone network. The SDN segment includes another Controller and Programmable switches. The Operated segment contains a Robotic arm. The Level of distribution and access is shown at both ends of the network. + +**Figure 1 – Model network structure for tactile Internet applications testing** + +The model network of the tactile Internet consists of the following main components: + +Operator segment: Kinesthetic sensors and tactile and kinesthetic actuators may be represented as a variety of sensors that can read the exact movement of the hands and represent feedback to the interface, as shown in Figure 2. It is also possible to use other sensors that can read movements with the aid of sensor devices or augmented reality (AR) applications. + +SDN segment: Level of distribution and access is represented as a software-defined network (SDN) fragment with at least two transit nodes that allows data transfer simulation performing through the real network with a capability to change different parameters as delays and packet loss. At this level, classes of network traffic are defined and priorities are set. For traffic generated by tactile Internet applications, priority is set in the light of the need to minimize end-to-end delays. + +DWDM segment: Backbone network is represented as dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) fragment network with the data rate more than 10 Gbit/s. With DWDM equipment and an SDN controller connection there is a capability for flexible traffic-QoS-parameters management. + +NOTE – According to [b-5G-ENABLED TI], the maximum transmission distance in the DWDM segment must be less than 100 kilometres to meet the requirements of 1 millisecond round-trip time, taking into account that the light propagation in the optic fibre is not the only source of time delay in the network. + +Operated segment: Kinesthetic actuators and tactile and kinesthetic sensors are represented as operating mechanisms (e.g., a robotic arm) for performing commands transmitted through the network and collecting tactile information from the environment. The time required for performing commands depends on the technical characteristics of the hardware devices used on the model network. + +![Diagram of data flows in the model network showing Operator domain, Network domain, and Operated domain.](7a0db9703b68b3d06cdaeefc084c0006_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the data flows in the model network, divided into three main domains: Operator domain, Network domain, and Operated domain. + +- Operator domain:** Contains a human operator and a set of sensors/actuators. The sensors are used to record movements, and the actuators provide feedback. The operator sends **Kinesthetic control (movements)** to the Network domain. +- Network domain:** Represented by a cloud, it acts as the communication bridge between the Operator and Operated domains. +- Operated domain:** Contains a **Robotic arm**. It receives **Kinesthetic control (movements)** from the Network domain and sends back **Kinesthetic feedback** and **Tactile feedback** through the Network domain. + +Below the Operator domain, the text lists: +– Kinesthetic sensors to record movements +– Tactile and kinesthetic actors to provide feedback + +Below the Operated domain, the text lists: +– Kinesthetic actors to display movements +– Tactile and kinesthetic sensors to record feedback + +Q.4065(21)\_F02 + +Diagram of data flows in the model network showing Operator domain, Network domain, and Operated domain. + +**Figure 2 – Data flows in the model network** + +Additional components of model network include: + +- equipment for simulation of public telecommunication networks traffic, including voice and video traffic, IoT traffic; +- a set of measuring equipment (traffic analyser, network performance analyser) connected to the access and distribution network. + +# 7 Network parameters to test + +Since tactile Internet applications are critically sensitive to time delay and reliability of the network, it is required to measure the following network parameters while testing. + +## 7.1 Round-trip time (RTT) + +This delay comprises all the delays experienced by a communication from origin to destination and back from destination to origin. It includes the time spent in the transmission of the information from the operator domain via the communication infrastructure to the operated domain and back from the operated domain to the operator, including following: + +- 1) Data processing delay in the user equipment both in the operator and operated domains. +- 2) Queueing, processing, and bufferization delay in the SDN switches, DWDM transmitters, and other network equipment. + +- 3) Propagation delay in all the network segments. +- 4) Generation of a reaction in the operated domain. + +Figure 3 shows round trip time (RTT) estimation. + +![Diagram illustrating Round Trip Time (RTT) estimation across a network path. On the left, 'Operator equipment' (represented by a laptop icon) and 'Measuring equipment' (represented by a laptop icon) are connected to a 'Programmable switch'. This switch is part of the 'Level of distribution and access' and is also connected to a 'Controller' (represented by a server icon). The 'Programmable switch' is connected to a 'DWDM equipment' block, which is part of the 'Backbone network'. The 'Backbone network' consists of two 'DWDM equipment' blocks connected in series. The second 'DWDM equipment' block is connected to another 'Programmable switch' on the right, which is also part of the 'Level of distribution and access' and connected to a 'Controller'. This 'Programmable switch' is connected to 'Operated equipment' (represented by a server icon). A long double-headed arrow labeled 'ICMP or UDP packet' spans from the 'Measuring equipment' on the left to the 'Operated equipment' on the right, indicating the RTT measurement path. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4065(21)_F03' in the bottom right corner.](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +Diagram illustrating Round Trip Time (RTT) estimation across a network path. On the left, 'Operator equipment' (represented by a laptop icon) and 'Measuring equipment' (represented by a laptop icon) are connected to a 'Programmable switch'. This switch is part of the 'Level of distribution and access' and is also connected to a 'Controller' (represented by a server icon). The 'Programmable switch' is connected to a 'DWDM equipment' block, which is part of the 'Backbone network'. The 'Backbone network' consists of two 'DWDM equipment' blocks connected in series. The second 'DWDM equipment' block is connected to another 'Programmable switch' on the right, which is also part of the 'Level of distribution and access' and connected to a 'Controller'. This 'Programmable switch' is connected to 'Operated equipment' (represented by a server icon). A long double-headed arrow labeled 'ICMP or UDP packet' spans from the 'Measuring equipment' on the left to the 'Operated equipment' on the right, indicating the RTT measurement path. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4065(21)\_F03' in the bottom right corner. + +**Figure 3 – Round trip time estimation** + +The importance of this metric lies in the fact that if RTT exceeds the human reaction time (approximately 1 millisecond for the haptic applications), the experience is considered as less realistic, with too great a gap between stimulation and response [b-ITU-T TWR TI]. + +One of the challenges of RTT estimation for the TI systems is that the delay should be measured in microseconds, as the target RTT for such systems is 1 millisecond. There are two approaches to measure the RTT with the required precision: software tools installed on the computer, and special hardware equipment. + +### 7.1.1 Software tools + +The delay may be measured with a variety of similar to "ping" utilities and tools, installed on the model network equipment or computer dedicated to network parameters estimation. These tools send an Internet control message protocol (ICMP) echo request and calculate the time between send and receive with the required degree of accuracy. + +Additionally, RTT measurement may be performed using user datagram protocol (UDP) packets sent to the closed port on the operated equipment aimed to receive a "Port unreachable" response. This method allows varying of packet size and other parameters, so the test packets are processed the same way as data packets sent by the terminal equipment. + +NOTE – Both methods do not include the data processing delay in the operator and operated equipment, as well as the generation of a reaction in the operated domain. Moreover, delays produced by the host computer software may change the results of the RTT estimation. All these delays should be considered in case of QoS estimation. + +### 7.1.2 Hardware equipment + +The network monitoring hardware tools can be used for RTT estimation as well as the other equipment intended to measure network delay. In this case, more reliable results may be obtained, compared to the software approach, as the delays produced by the other computer software is eliminated. + +## 7.2 Delays on each network segment + +In case of significant exceedance of required RTT, measurement of delay on each network segment may be useful to understand the sources of additional latency. These delays may be measured as described in clause 7.1, but with alternative target nodes, i.e., the first SDN switch, the DWDM + +transmitter and receiver. Complementary time on each step represents doubled delay in the access network, SDN, and backbone network respectively, as shown in Figure 4. + +![Figure 4: Measurement of additional delay on each network segment. The diagram shows a network architecture with two 'Level of distribution and access' segments connected by a 'Backbone network' containing two 'DWDM equipment' units. Each 'Level of distribution and access' segment includes a 'Controller', 'Programmable switch', 'Operator equipment', and 'Measuring equipment'. Horizontal arrows at the bottom indicate the measurement points for 'Access network', 'Access network and SDN', and 'Access network, SDN, and backbone network'. A label 'Q.4065(21)_F04' is in the bottom right corner.](5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg) + +Figure 4: Measurement of additional delay on each network segment. The diagram shows a network architecture with two 'Level of distribution and access' segments connected by a 'Backbone network' containing two 'DWDM equipment' units. Each 'Level of distribution and access' segment includes a 'Controller', 'Programmable switch', 'Operator equipment', and 'Measuring equipment'. Horizontal arrows at the bottom indicate the measurement points for 'Access network', 'Access network and SDN', and 'Access network, SDN, and backbone network'. A label 'Q.4065(21)\_F04' is in the bottom right corner. + +**Figure 4 – Measurement of additional delay on each network segment** + +## 7.3 Data loss coefficient + +The data loss coefficient may be calculated as the percentage of data that have been lost during the end-to-end network transmission. Different applications require different data loss coefficients (in a similar way to IP packet loss coefficient [ITU-T Y.1540]). As well as the time network indicators, the data loss coefficient for the TI systems should be measured with a high precision. It is recommended to use up to 100 000 UDP packets of the same size as actual data packets with the 10-100 millisecond interval sent from the operator segment to the operated segment, and the same amount sent in the opposite direction. + +With an equal size of testing packets the data loss coefficient may be calculated as the number of received responses divided by number of sent requests. + +# 8 Model network testing scenarios + +To test tactile Internet solutions, it is necessary to specify different testing scenarios for a developed model network. A test procedure may consist of a one or more different test scenarios at the same time. It is possible to define following test scenarios: + +- 1) Tactile and kinesthetic sensors and actuators test. The objective of this scenario is to verify the accuracy of the tactile and kinesthetic sensors' values and tactile and kinesthetic actuators' actions by the special server-side test application. +- 2) Software defined network switch and controller test. The objective of this scenario is to verify the accuracy of the SDN switch and controller switching, routing, and load balancing functions by special on-controller testing application. +- 3) Dense wavelength division multiplexing test. The objective of this scenario is to verify the accuracy of the DWDM equipment multiplexing, demultiplexing, packets checking, and other functions by the special server-side test application. +- 4) Quality of service test. The objective of this scenario is to verify (by the special server-side test application) the values of the different network parameters, e.g., parameters presented in clause 7, are in the required range during data transmission through the model network. + +# Appendix I + +### Use cases + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +The following use case scenarios may be applied as a part of a testing procedure. + +### **I.1     Movement transmission test** + +Preconditions: Model network is deployed and ready to test. + +Basic flow: Test engineer moves kinesthetic device. + +Result: Kinesthetic actuator (physical or virtual) moves in the same way. + +### **I.2     Kinesthetic feedback test** + +Preconditions: Use case 8.1 Movement transmission test. + +Basic flow: + +Test engineer moves kinesthetic device. + +Kinesthetic actuator interacts with the environment (real or virtual). + +Result: Test engineer feels kinesthetic feedback from the remote environment. + +### **I.3     Tactile feedback test** + +Preconditions: Use case 8.1 Movement transmission test. + +Basic flow: + +Test engineer moves kinesthetic device. + +Kinesthetic actuator interacts with the environment (real or virtual). + +Tactile sensors receive tactile information from the environment. + +Result: Test engineer feels tactile feedback from the remote environment with a tactile actuator. + +The last use case should be repeated for every tactile feedback channel (e.g., vibration, temperature, macroscopic roughness). + +More detailed use cases should be created for specific applications according to their characteristics. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T TWR TI] ITU-T Technology Watch Report (2014), *The Tactile Internet*. +- [b-5G-ENABLED TI] M. Simsek, A. Aijaz, M. Dohler, J. Sachs and G. Fettweis (March 2016), *5G-Enabled Tactile Internet*, in *IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications*, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 460-473, doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2016.2525398. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4070-202302-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4070-202302-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38bdd7bc1d3581fbdc3cf6b035f618693dbe3846 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4070-202302-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:75efa8e3513a799767c04a0bb7bcd87a550f2378f5880629068581808c1c9f7f +size 7353 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abda52cbb1047d6649f89e40c898a1c33bed7267 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6f3b7e07231c0f3e116c99c493bdda98ecd52313b6735faa6cea23815cf3162b +size 7190 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49303d76639d700ced7dfc3591fbc97f24b378ec --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:226f5674827815b525965ffa6bd9df6a5f20dd15903f64f671744384cfea59d3 +size 20277 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..204aca6f54bf53793cf2eb8e663b8d385bfb3814 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d3aff86b47568289fb5b0bd6c954794e181f1ef8fbb2bcd2926a82117eeb1ba8 +size 49461 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af6be343f0c0a8f155f965dcf337b8af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af6be343f0c0a8f155f965dcf337b8af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4f079e30d748b463b768c9acd2e6c8dcd260470 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af6be343f0c0a8f155f965dcf337b8af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ba3f2009e6c42fd9972da9a40e65430af1d1313d911ccab79568af9f7fca6194 +size 19932 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00d751f0063b57b967c3644ac8d82871cb70c659 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fae02c5baa0108ed01635275996aac3d6f3bbcb524157936f3f1df47cdb953fc +size 57890 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/d17f75945bbb3feb84a153ecfedb9b81_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/d17f75945bbb3feb84a153ecfedb9b81_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..424a284893bf899b91459f6b08d273049048e521 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/d17f75945bbb3feb84a153ecfedb9b81_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eb01fc5c681b9e859ad371f92d5c78c965d0d53e348f86e9dda35fbb3c517128 +size 16346 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fbfaa3168b3cfa6daa4943d6c231f472c2329afe --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf7a560c7ab0ccb0ca0f2e450abda7822eef89c90f8a2a1cf31ccbc0e67752b5 +size 35191 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d7d9333c9524a686a4d91e3b8782166a853de23 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:66d741a530779811ebe41c9e35538cffc73490c23ff3e1a45bfb38b263408291 +size 92321 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48ec88827897dd0ee7d99e2cf10dd81f3f2b81b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4140-202307-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,799 @@ + + +# Recommendation **ITU-T Q.4140 (07/2023)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated +measurements and tests + +Protocols and signalling for computing power networks + +--- + +# **Signalling requirements for service deployment in computing power networks** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font overlaid on the globe. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4140 + +# Signalling requirements for service deployment in computing power networks + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4140 provides the signalling procedures and signalling requirements for service deployment in computing power networks (CPNs) based on Recommendation ITU-T Y.2501. The signalling requirements for service deployment include centralized mode and distributed mode. + +## History\* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4140 | 2023-07-14 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/15585 | + +## Keywords + +Centralized mode, computing power network, distributed mode, service deployment, signalling requirements. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had [not] received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2023 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 1 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Overview for service deployment in CPNs ..... | 2 | +| 6.1 Introduction ..... | 2 | +| 6.2 Interface reference model ..... | 2 | +| 7 Data model for service deployment in CPN ..... | 4 | +| 7.1 Resource ..... | 4 | +| 7.2 Service ..... | 5 | +| 8 Signalling procedures for service deployment in CPN..... | 6 | +| 8.1 Signalling procedure for resource reporting..... | 6 | +| 8.2 Signalling procedure for service deployment based on centralized mode .... | 6 | +| 8.3 Signalling procedure for service deployment based on distributed mode..... | 7 | +| 9 Signalling requirements for service deployment in CPN ..... | 8 | +| 9.1 Overview ..... | 8 | +| 9.2 Signalling requirements for resource reporting..... | 9 | +| 9.3 Signalling requirement for service deployment based on centralized mode .. | 10 | +| 9.4 Signalling requirement for service deployment based on distributed mode .. | 13 | +| Appendix I – An example of modelling computing power ..... | 14 | + + + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4140 + +# Signalling requirements for service deployment in computing power networks + +# 1 Scope + +The scope of this Recommendation includes: + +- overview for service deployment in computing power network (CPNs); +- data model for service deployment in CPNs; +- signalling procedures for service deployment in CPNs; +- signalling requirements for service deployment in CPNs; + +The appendix to this Recommendation also provides an example of: + +- modelling computing power. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-T Y.2501] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2501 (2021), *Computing power network-framework and architecture*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +None. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-------|--------------------------------------------| +| CPN | Computing Power Network | +| CPU | Central Processing Unit | +| DPU | Data Processing Unit | +| FLOPS | Floating Point Operations Per Second | +| GPU | Graphics Processing Unit | +| ISIS | Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System | +| OAM | Operation Administration and Maintenance | + +# 5 Conventions + +In this Recommendation, the keywords "is required to" indicate a requirement which must be strictly followed and from which no deviation is permitted if conformance to this Recommendation is to be claimed. + +In the body of this Recommendation and its appendices, the words shall, shall not, should and may sometimes appear, in which case they are to be interpreted, respectively as, is required to, is prohibited from, is recommended and can optionally. The appearance of such phrases or keywords in an appendix or in material explicitly marked as informative are to be interpreted as having no normative intent. + +{A}: indicates that the parameter A is mandatory. + +[B]: indicates that the parameter B is optional. + +\*: indicates that the parameter may be multiple items. + +# 6 Overview for service deployment in CPNs + +## 6.1 Introduction + +As specified in [ITU-T Y.2501], a CPN is a new type of network that realizes optimized resource allocation by distributing computing, storage, network and other resource information of service nodes through a network control plane (such as a centralized controller, distributed routing protocol, etc.). + +Service deployment is a major activity in a CPN. Based on user request, service deployment is realized through the joint selection of computing power resources and network resources. There are two modes for realizing service deployment. One is the centralized mode, that is, service deployment based on the resource selection by a centralized manner. The other one is the distributed mode, that is, service deployment based on extended distributed routing protocol which combines computing power resources and network resources. + +Service deployment based on the centralized mode can better meet the user's complex requirements. Service deployment based on the distributed mode can be quickly deployed and more suitable for time sensitive scenarios. + +## 6.2 Interface reference model + +Based on the functional architecture of the CPN specified in [ITU-T Y.2501], the functions of resource reporting and service deployment are performed by functional components in different layers, whose messages are exchanged over the interfaces shown in Figure 6-1. + +![Diagram showing the interfaces between functional entities across four layers: CPN service layer, CPN control layer, CPN resource layer, and CPN orchestration and management layer. The diagram illustrates the flow of information between various functions through specific interfaces labeled Ssr, Sat, Ssp, Snr, Sfp, and Smr.](ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interfaces between functional entities across four layers: + +- CPN service layer:** Contains 'Resource information processing', 'Billing', and 'Transaction process execution'. +- CPN control layer:** Contains 'Resource information collection', 'Resource allocation', and 'Network connection scheduling'. +- CPN resource layer:** Contains 'Network resource', 'Service resource', 'Computing resource', and 'Storage resource'. +- CPN orchestration and management layer:** Contains 'CPN orchestrator', 'CPN security', 'Computing power modelling', and 'Computing power OAM'. + +Interfaces shown: + +- Ssr:** Between 'Resource information processing' (service layer) and 'CPN orchestrator' (orchestration layer). +- Sat:** Between 'Resource information collection' (control layer) and 'CPN orchestrator' (orchestration layer). +- Ssp:** Between 'CPN orchestrator' (orchestration layer) and 'CPN security' (orchestration layer). +- Snr:** Between 'Network resource' (resource layer) and 'Resource information collection' (control layer). +- Sfp:** Between 'Resource allocation' (control layer) and 'Network resource' (resource layer). +- Smr:** Between 'Computing power modelling' (orchestration layer) and 'Network resource' (resource layer). + +Q.4140(23) + +Diagram showing the interfaces between functional entities across four layers: CPN service layer, CPN control layer, CPN resource layer, and CPN orchestration and management layer. The diagram illustrates the flow of information between various functions through specific interfaces labeled Ssr, Sat, Ssp, Snr, Sfp, and Smr. + +**Figure 6-1 – Interfaces between functional entities** + +NOTE 1 – The network connection scheduling function and the resource allocation function in the CPN control layer share the information for service paths. The CPN orchestrator function and computing power modelling function in the CPN orchestration and management layer share the information for service requests. + +NOTE 2 – The computing power operation administration and maintenance (OAM) function obtains computing resource and storage resource from the CPN resource layer through the management interface. The resource information reported to the computing power OAM function is required at a certain interval, or a threshold is required to be set. When the changes exceed the threshold, the resource information is reported. The computing power modelling function obtains the required computing power resource from the computing power OAM function. The CPN orchestrator function obtains computing power resource and modelled computing power resource from the computing power modelling function. + +### 6.2.1 Snr + +Snr is defined as the interface between the network resource function in the CPN resource layer and the resource information collection function in the CPN control layer. In the process of resource reporting, through interface Snr, network resource information is transmitted. + +### 6.2.2 Sat + +Sat is defined as the interface between the resource information collection function in the CPN control layer and the CPN orchestrator function in the CPN orchestration and management layer. In the process of resource reporting, through interface Sat, abstract topology information is transmitted. + +### 6.2.3 Smr + +Smr is defined as the interface between the computing power modelling function in the CPN orchestration and management layer and the network resource function in the CPN resource layer. In the process of service deployment based on distributed mode, through interface Smr, the modelled computing power resource information is transmitted. + +### 6.2.4 Ssr + +Ssr is defined as the interface between the resource information processing function in the CPN service layer and the CPN orchestrator function in the CPN orchestration and management layer. In the process of service deployment, through interface Ssr, the service request information is transmitted. + +### 6.2.5 Ssp + +Ssp is defined as the interface between the CPN orchestrator function in the CPN orchestration and management layer and the network connection scheduling function in the CPN control layer. In the process of service deployment based on centralized mode, through interface Ssp, the service path information is transmitted. + +### 6.2.6 Sfp + +Sfp is defined as the interface between the resource allocation function in the CPN control layer and the network resource function in the CPN resource layer. In the process of service deployment based on centralized mode, through interface Sfp, the forwarding path information is transmitted. + +# 7 Data model for service deployment in CPN + +## 7.1 Resource + +### 7.1.1 Node + +The data model description for a node is specified in Table 7-1. + +**Table 7-1 – Data model description for a node** + +| Element | Description | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| NodeID | NodeID uniquely specifies the node identification. | +| NodeType | NodeType specifies the node type, e.g., provider edge, etc. | +| NodeRole | NodeRole specifies the node role in the network. | +| InterfaceList | InterfaceList specifies the list of interfaces. Clause 7.1.2 provides an interface data model description. | + +### 7.1.2 Interface + +The data model description for an interface is specified in Table 7-2. + +**Table 7-2 – Data model description for an interface** + +| Element | Description | +|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| InterfaceID | InterfaceID uniquely specifies the interface identification. | +| InterfaceType | InterfaceType specifies the interface type, e.g., the optical interface, etc. | +| AccessInfo | AccessInfo specifies the interface information, including IP address, mask, etc. | +| Speed | Speed specifies the interface speed. | + +### 7.1.3 Link + +The data model description for a link is specified in Table 7-3. + +**Table 7-3 – Data model description for a link** + +| Element | Description | +|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| LinkID | LinkID uniquely specifies the link identification. | +| SourceNodeID | SourceNodeID specifies the source node identification of the link. | +| SourceInterfaceID | SourceInterfaceID specifies the source interface identification of the link. | + +**Table 7-3 – Data model description for a link** + +| Element | Description | +|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DestinationNodeID | DestinationNodeID specifies the destination node identification of the link. | +| DestinationInterfaceID | DestinationInterfaceID specifies the destination interface identification of the link. | + +## **7.2 Service** + +### **7.2.1 Network resource attributes** + +The data model description for network resource attributes is specified in Table 7-5. + +**Table 7-5 – Data model for network resource attributes** + +| Element | Description | +|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| Bandwidth | Bandwidth specifies the bandwidth requirement of the service. | +| Latency | Latency specifies the latency requirement of the service. | +| Jitter | Jitter specifies the jitter requirement of the service. | + +### **7.2.2 Computing power resource attributes** + +The data model description for computing power resource attributes is specified in Table 7-6. + +**Table 7-6 – Data model description for computing power resource attributes** + +| Element | Description | +|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Computing | Computing specifies the computing requirement of the service, e.g., CPU, GPU, DPU, etc. | +| Storage | Storage specifies the storage requirement of the service. | +| Memory | Memory specifies the memory requirement of the service. | + +### **7.2.3 Service attributes** + +The data model description for service attributes is specified in Table 7-7. + +**Table 7-7 – Data model description for service attributes** + +| Element | Description | +|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ServiceFunc | ServiceFunc specifies the service function information, e.g., firewall, DPI, etc. | +| NetworkResourceAttribute | NetworkResourceAttribute specifies the network resource attributes. Clause 7.2.1 provides network resource attribute data model description. | +| ComputingPowerResourceAttribute | ComputingPowerResourceAttribute specifies the computing power resource attributes. Clause 7.2.2 provides computing power resource attribute data model description. | + +# 8 Signalling procedures for service deployment in CPN + +## 8.1 Signalling procedure for resource reporting + +### 8.1.1 Signalling procedure for network resources reporting + +Figure 8-1 describes the information flow of network resource reporting procedure via interface Snr. The information exchange is based on push mode. + +![Sequence diagram for network resources reporting procedure](1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg) + +A sequence diagram illustrating the network resources reporting procedure. It features two lifelines: 'Network resource' on the left and 'Resource information collection' on the right. Step 1 shows a message 'Network resource information message, through interface Snr' sent from the Network resource to the Resource information collection. Step 2 shows a response message 'Network resource information response message, through interface Snr' sent from the Resource information collection back to the Network resource. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4140(23)' at the bottom right. + +Sequence diagram for network resources reporting procedure + +**Figure 8-1 – Network resources reporting procedure** + +Step 1: The network resource function sends a network resource information message to the resource information collection function. + +Step 2: The resource information collection function responds to the network resource function to acknowledge that the information is received. + +### 8.1.2 Signalling procedure for abstract topology reporting + +Figure 8-2 describes the information flow of abstract topology reporting procedure via interface Sat. The information exchange is based on push-mode. + +![Sequence diagram for abstract topology reporting procedure](af6be343f0c0a8f155f965dcf337b8af_img.jpg) + +A sequence diagram illustrating the abstract topology reporting procedure. It features two lifelines: 'Resource information collection' on the left and 'CPN orchestrator' on the right. Step 1 shows a message 'Abstract topology information message, through interface Sat' sent from the Resource information collection to the CPN orchestrator. Step 2 shows a response message 'Abstract topology information response message, through interface Sat' sent from the CPN orchestrator back to the Resource information collection. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4140(23)' at the bottom right. + +Sequence diagram for abstract topology reporting procedure + +**Figure 8-2 – Abstract topology reporting procedure** + +Step 1: The resource information collection function generates and sends an abstract topology information message to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Step 2: The CPN orchestrator function responds to the resource information collection function to acknowledge that the information is received. + +## 8.2 Signalling procedure for service deployment based on centralized mode + +Figure 8-3 describes the information flow of service deployment procedure based on centralized mode via interfaces Ssr, Ssp and Sfp, and the functional entities: resource information processing function, CPN orchestrator function, network connection scheduling function, resource allocation function and network resource function. The information exchange is based on push mode. + +![Sequence diagram of service deployment procedure based on centralized mode. The diagram shows interactions between Resource information processing, CPN orchestrator, CPN control layer (containing Network connection scheduling and Resource allocation), and Network resource. The steps are: 1. Service request information message (Ssr) from Resource information processing to CPN orchestrator. 2. Service path information message (Ssp) from CPN orchestrator to Network connection scheduling. 3. Forwarding path information message (Sfp) from Resource allocation to Network resource. 4. Forwarding path information response message (Sfp) from Network resource to Resource allocation. 5. Service path information response message (Ssp) from Network connection scheduling to CPN orchestrator. 6. Service request information response message (Ssr) from CPN orchestrator to Resource information processing. The diagram is labeled Q.4140(23) at the bottom right.](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram of service deployment procedure based on centralized mode. The diagram shows interactions between Resource information processing, CPN orchestrator, CPN control layer (containing Network connection scheduling and Resource allocation), and Network resource. The steps are: 1. Service request information message (Ssr) from Resource information processing to CPN orchestrator. 2. Service path information message (Ssp) from CPN orchestrator to Network connection scheduling. 3. Forwarding path information message (Sfp) from Resource allocation to Network resource. 4. Forwarding path information response message (Sfp) from Network resource to Resource allocation. 5. Service path information response message (Ssp) from Network connection scheduling to CPN orchestrator. 6. Service request information response message (Ssr) from CPN orchestrator to Resource information processing. The diagram is labeled Q.4140(23) at the bottom right. + +**Figure 8-3 – Service deployment procedure based on centralized mode** + +Step 1: The resource information processing function sends a service request information message to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Step 2: The CPN orchestrator function selects the computing power resource pool according to computing power resource and abstract topology, which are stored in the database, and then generates and sends a service path information message to the network connection scheduling function. + +Step 3: The resource allocation function calculates the related forwarding path based on network topology and the resource allocation function sends forwarding path information message to the network resource function. + +Step 4: The network resource function responds to the resource allocation function by the creation result of forwarding path. + +Step 5: The network connection scheduling function responds to the CPN orchestrator function by the creation result of service path. + +Step 6: The CPN orchestrator function responds to the resource information processing function by the service deployment result. + +## 8.3 Signalling procedure for service deployment based on distributed mode + +The premise of realizing service deployment by distributed routing is that computing power resource information is carried by the routing protocol to be announced in the network. + +NOTE 1 – The expansion for the distributed routing protocols using computing power resource information is out of the scope of this Recommendation. + +Figure 8-4 describes the information flow of service deployment based on distributed mode via interfaces Ssr and Smr, based on the functional entities: resource information processing function, CPN orchestrator function, computing power modelling function and network resource function. + +![Sequence diagram showing the service deployment procedure based on distributed mode. It involves four steps: 1. Resource information processing sends a service request information message to the CPN orchestrator. 2. The CPN orchestrator calls the computing power modelling function. 3. The computing power modelling function sends a modelled computing power resource information message to the network resource. 4. The network resource sends a forwarding path information response message back to the computing power modelling function, which then sends a service request information response message back to the resource information processing function. A dashed box labeled 'CPN orchestration and management layer' contains the CPN orchestrator and computing power modelling functions. Reference Q.4140(23) is at the bottom right.](4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the service deployment procedure based on distributed mode. It involves four steps: 1. Resource information processing sends a service request information message to the CPN orchestrator. 2. The CPN orchestrator calls the computing power modelling function. 3. The computing power modelling function sends a modelled computing power resource information message to the network resource. 4. The network resource sends a forwarding path information response message back to the computing power modelling function, which then sends a service request information response message back to the resource information processing function. A dashed box labeled 'CPN orchestration and management layer' contains the CPN orchestrator and computing power modelling functions. Reference Q.4140(23) is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 8-4 – Service deployment procedure based on distributed mode** + +Step 1: The resource information processing function sends a service request information message to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Step 2: The computing power modelling function realizes modelling and evaluation through the unified modelling evaluation method based on the real-time obtained computing power resource information from the computing power OAM function. After modelling, the computing power modelling function sends the modelled computing power resource information message to the network resource function. + +NOTE 2 – The method for modelling computing power resource is out of the scope of this Recommendation. There is an example in Appendix I describing how to read the model for computing power resource and how to support the routing table generation of the extended distributed routing protocol. + +Step 3: The network resource function queries the mapping between the user access node and the computing power resource pool and establishes forwarding paths based on the routing table including the modelled computing power resource information. The network resource function responds to the computing power modelling function by the result of the forwarding path. + +Step 4: The CPN orchestrator function responds to the resource information processing function by the service deployment result. + +# 9 Signalling requirements for service deployment in CPN + +## 9.1 Overview + +NOTE – No transport protocol for the signalling messages is specified here. No message content format is specified here either. The signalling messages may be extensible markup language (XML)-based messages over (or carried by) transmission control protocol (TCP), user datagram protocol (UDP), stream control transmission protocol (SCTP), transport layer security (TLS), etc. All the messages consist of the message header and the message body. The message format is described in Figure 9-1. + +![Diagram showing the message composition. It consists of a table with four columns: Message type, Message length, Transaction ID, and Message body. A bracket below the first three columns is labeled 'Message header'. Reference Q.4140(23) is at the bottom right.](d17f75945bbb3feb84a153ecfedb9b81_img.jpg) + +| | | | | +|--------------|----------------|----------------|--------------| +| Message type | Message length | Transaction ID | Message body | +|--------------|----------------|----------------|--------------| + +Message header + +Q.4140(23) + +Diagram showing the message composition. It consists of a table with four columns: Message type, Message length, Transaction ID, and Message body. A bracket below the first three columns is labeled 'Message header'. Reference Q.4140(23) is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 9-1 – Message composition** + +The message header field contains the following information: + +- message type: uniquely specifies the type of message; +- message length: specifies the length of the message body; +- message transaction ID: generated by the sender of the message. + +If there is a response message for the request message, the transaction IDs of the request and response messages are the same. + +The message body field contains the message contents. + +## 9.2 Signalling requirements for resource reporting + +### 9.2.1 Signalling requirements for interface Snr + +The network resource information message is defined as NetRes message. + +The NetRes message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the network resource function to the resource information collection function. + +Message format: + +``` +< NetRes-Message > ::= < Message Header > + {Node-List} + {Link-List} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) `Node-List` uniquely specifies the node information. Each node in `Node-List` is described using the data model defined in clause 7.1.1. +- (2) `Link-List` uniquely specifies the link information, which is described using the data model defined in clause 7.1.3. + +The network resource information response message is defined as NetRes-R message. + +The NetRes-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the resource information collection function to the network resource function in order to acknowledge that the information has been received. + +Message format: + +``` +< NetRes-R-Message > ::= < Message Header > + {NetRes-Result} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +`NetRes-Result` specifies the acknowledgement of the network resource information collection. + +### 9.2.2 Signalling requirement for interface Sat + +Abstract topology is a kind of logical topology including some key network nodes and links, which are used for orchestrating service paths. + +The abstract topology resource information message is defined as AbstractTopology message. + +The AbstractTopology message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the resource information collection function to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Message format: + +``` +< AbstractTopology-Message > ::= < Message Header > + + {Node-List} + + {Link-List} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) Node-List uniquely specifies the node information, whose node roles are access node, the node connected to computing power resource pools and the node connected to the other network domain which is described using the data model defined in clause 7.1.1. +- (2) Link-List uniquely specifies the virtual link information in the abstract topology, which connects the nodes above and is described using the data model defined in clause 7.1.3. + +The abstract topology resource information response message is defined as AbstractTopology-R message. + +The AbstractTopology-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the CPN orchestrator function to the resource information collection function. + +Message format: + +``` +< AbstractTopology-R-Message > ::= < Message Header > + + {AbstractTopology-Result} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +AbstractTopology-Result specifies the acknowledgement of receiving abstract topology. + +## 9.3 Signalling requirement for service deployment based on centralized mode + +### 9.3.1 Signalling requirement for interface Ssr + +The service request information message is defined as Servicetemplate message. + +The Servicetemplate message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the resource information processing function to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Message format: + +``` +< Servicetemplate-Message > ::= < Message Header > + + {Service-ID} + + {Access-Node-ID} + + {Service-Attribute-List} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) Service-ID uniquely specifies the service identification. + +- (2) Access-Node-ID uniquely specifies the node identification, indicating the access node of the user. +- (3) Service-Attribute-List specifies the service request information including the required service function, the required network resource and the required computing power resource, which is described using the data model in clause 7.2.3. + +The service request information response message is defined as Servicetemplate-R message. + +The Servicetemplate-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the CPN orchestrator function to the resource information processing function. + +Message format: + +``` + +< Servicetemplate-R-Message > ::=< Message Header > + + {Servicetemplate-Result} + +``` + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +Servicetemplate-Result information specifies the results of service deployment. + +### 9.3.2 Signalling requirement for interface Ssp + +Service path is a path generated by CPN orchestrator function based on abstract topology and computing power resource. + +The service path information message is defined as Servicepath message. + +The Servicepath message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the CPN orchestrator function to the network connection scheduling function. + +Message format: + +``` + +< Servicepath-Message > ::=< Message Header > + + {Service-ID} + {Access-Node-ID} + {Network-Resource-Attributes} + *{Pool-ID} + {Link-List} + +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) Service-ID uniquely specifies the service identification. +- (2) Access-Node-ID uniquely specifies the node identification, indicating the access node of the user. +- (3) Network-Resource-Attributes specifies the required network resource attributes, which is described using the data model defined in clause 7.2.1. +- (4) Pool-ID uniquely specifies the pool identification, indicating the selected computing power resource pool. +- (5) Link-List uniquely specifies the virtual link information, which connects the access node of the user and the computing power resource pools and is described using the data model defined in clause 7.1.3. + +The service path information response message is defined as Servicepath-R message. + +The Servicepath-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the network connection scheduling function to the CPN orchestrator function. + +Message format: + +``` +< Servicepath-R-Message > ::= < Message Header > + +{Servicepath-Result} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +Servicepath-Result specifies the acknowledgement of receiving service path. + +### 9.3.3 Signalling requirement of interface Sfp + +The forwarding path information message is defined as Forwardingpath message. + +The Forwardingpath message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the resource allocation function to the network resource function. + +Message format: + +``` +< Forwardingpath-Message > ::= < Message Header > + +{Service-ID} +*{Forwarding-Node-ID} +*{Forwarding-Interface-ID} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) Service-ID uniquely specifies the service identification. +- (2) Forwarding-Node-ID specifies the node identification, indicating the forwarding node. The access node of the user is the first forwarding node. +- (3) Forwarding-Interface-ID specifies the interface identification, indicating the forwarding interface. + +NOTE – The forwarding nodes are arranged in an order to form a path. Forwarding-Node-ID and Forwarding-Interface-ID have one to one relationship. + +The forwarding path information response message is defined as Forwardingpath-R message. + +The Forwardingpath-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the network resource function to the resource allocation function. + +Message format: + +``` +< Forwardingpath-R-Message > ::= < Message Header > + +{Forwardingpath-Result} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +Forwardingpath-Result specifies the creation result of forwarding path. + +## 9.4 Signalling requirement for service deployment based on distributed mode + +NOTE – The signalling requirements for interface Ssr for distributed mode and centralized mode are the same. The modelled computing power resource information message is defined as ModelledResource message. + +The ModelledResource message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the computing power modelling function to the network resource function via the interface Smr. + +Message format: + +``` +< ModelledResource-Message > ::= < Message Header > + {Service-ID} + {Access-node-ID} + *{Pool-ID} + *{Evaluation-Value} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +- (1) Service-ID uniquely specifies the service identification. +- (2) Access-node-ID uniquely specifies the node identification, indicating the access node of the user. +- (3) Pool-ID uniquely specifies the computing power resource pool identification. +- (4) Evaluation-Value specifies the evaluation value of modelled computing power resources. + +Evaluation-Value is integrated by the distributed routing protocols with computing power resource information. + +NOTE – Pool-ID and Evaluation-Value have a one to one relationship. + +The forwarding path information response message is defined as Forwardingpath-R message. + +The Forwardingpath-R message, indicated by the message type in the message header field, is sent by the network resource function to the computing power modelling function. + +Message format: + +``` +< Forwardingpath-R-Message > ::= < Message Header > + {Forwardingpath-Result} +``` + +Meanings and explanations: + +The detailed information indicates but is not limited to: + +Forwardingpath-Result specifies the creation result of forwarding path. + +# Appendix I + +## An example of modelling computing power + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +Modelling itself provides a general method to evaluate the capacities of computing power resources. + +In the process of modelling, on the one hand, the same type of computing power resources should be unified into the same unit of measurement. On the other hand, some integrated index values can be used to comprehensively reflect the service support capabilities. + +An example is given to illustrate how to read the model for computing power resource and how to support generation of the routing table. + +As shown in the Figure I.1, there are two computing power resource pools providing services, and a user access the service from R1. + +![Figure I.1: An example of network topology. The diagram shows a network topology with three routers: R1, R2, and R3. R1 is connected to R2 via an interface labeled '1.1.1.0/30 cost: 10'. R1 is also connected to R3 via an interface labeled '1.1.1.4/30 cost: 20'. R2 is connected to R3. R2 is connected to a cloud labeled 'Resource pool N1' with IP address '192.168.12.0/24'. R3 is connected to a cloud labeled 'Resource pool N2' with IP address '192.168.13.0/24'. Each resource pool contains icons of servers and a database. A small label 'Q.4140(23)' is at the bottom right of the diagram.](e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg) + +Figure I.1: An example of network topology. The diagram shows a network topology with three routers: R1, R2, and R3. R1 is connected to R2 via an interface labeled '1.1.1.0/30 cost: 10'. R1 is also connected to R3 via an interface labeled '1.1.1.4/30 cost: 20'. R2 is connected to R3. R2 is connected to a cloud labeled 'Resource pool N1' with IP address '192.168.12.0/24'. R3 is connected to a cloud labeled 'Resource pool N2' with IP address '192.168.13.0/24'. Each resource pool contains icons of servers and a database. A small label 'Q.4140(23)' is at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Figure I.1 – An example of network topology + +Traditionally, the appropriate node is selected according to the network resources, that is, querying the routing table of R1, as shown in Table I.1. + +Table I.1 – Routing table of R1 + +| Destination IP | Protocol | Priority | Cost | Flag | NextHop | Interface | +|-----------------|----------|----------|------|------|---------|-----------| +| 192.168.12.0/24 | ISIS | 15 | 10 | D | 1.1.1.2 | GE0/0/1 | +| 192.168.13.0/24 | ISIS | 15 | 20 | D | 1.1.1.6 | GE0/0/2 | + +When services are deployed in both computing power resource pools, R1 node queries the cost value in the routing table to find that the R2 node as the next hop is more efficient. Therefore, traffic is scheduled to R2 to access service. + +In the CPN, the computing power modelling function obtains computing power resource information, such as the CPU capacity (e.g., 2.4 GHz), GPU capacity (e.g., 100TFLOPS) and so on. Based on the obtained information, CPU utilization (e.g., 40%), GPU utilization (e.g., 60%) and other factors are estimated. + +When computing resource parameters are combined, routing table information is expressed in Table I.2. + +**Table I.2 – Routing table of R1 including computing power parameter** + +| Destination IP | Protocol | Priority | Computing power cost | Network cost | Flag | NextHop | Interface | +|-----------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------------------|---------------------|-------------|----------------|------------------| +| 192.168.12.0/24 | ISIS | 15 | 10 | 10 | D | 1.1.1.2/30 | GE0/0/1 | +| 192.168.13.0/24 | ISIS | 15 | 20 | 10 | D | 1.1.1.6/30 | GE0/0/2 | + +More specific methods of measurement, modelling and distributing the computing metric are under research in the IETF CATS working group. + +When services are deployed in both computing power resource pools, R1 node queries the computing power cost and network cost to select appropriate next hop. In this example, the network cost is the same, R2 node is more efficient in terms of computing power cost. Therefore, traffic is scheduled to R2 to access service. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1629394c02f697f60ae954ad36bf274fa8082cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3763acd7a0ed56aa30f3f90468c1fb0cb54573eb9045bca3eddf8976b4f0f41d +size 7219 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3954da035c0c6db826ce694229a7e6f00960cf8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/16c1175b5f05a4b55e6d396fc51b15b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9e83c175be5b045c1a3bb52570bda69e5ae23ca70134b82cdd457054c5b2549c +size 88994 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/21ad58fee90f2be50708ff541d225507_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/21ad58fee90f2be50708ff541d225507_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76e238fb4583d2a7e457cabd3002fd1e78ec0eab --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/21ad58fee90f2be50708ff541d225507_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e1e995a48eb16374c8cc32b5f31e6aa9355666df5e87a019996a0892a71b94a7 +size 30569 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/3f1987804d7d78bc3b3bc560e974280a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/3f1987804d7d78bc3b3bc560e974280a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db71ce0eb1d70d17968ab11ddaabc11cde84bdbf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/3f1987804d7d78bc3b3bc560e974280a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f6eb9bc7837444570c69b6ce96a55fd493660f01c42f18ec0c5e34e5d6d12abf +size 58502 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/7c6d9bfe9c31ce872722d60b73d20df1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/7c6d9bfe9c31ce872722d60b73d20df1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f8d9379a395bbc89056a43584a64c1c93982fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/7c6d9bfe9c31ce872722d60b73d20df1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:54f8ab562c4be3736b94f196f64ef4d75ed540b1d7b1e71b18e0b03ebe6bfa87 +size 63759 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..caff06bf5132ff65939068c94ea1d0314e0335b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aae05620700518c502aadccd783776781a6dcafc43426e9c343110d26403f741 +size 50050 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd5541ca3b522c73f771e6fb14abd989be54b38d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5769fe8b8b16e8b19adffe87a7a2af46c0e4dfd00e2d15c9b41a61656ca27ee5 +size 43181 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0e70e980775cab0cc93b16e3cb114d098ae016f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dc62dc39304346358e4ccde61a15088638b81748b190eb2753c1cc1418a918b3 +size 37280 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4442dd36bd8bf052faa2bb433a36bbce323c6a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4143-202406-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bee1fd3b64e5defef53b7d821c864bb412af7a82212a5f9480f8d00e86262478 +size 59060 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abda52cbb1047d6649f89e40c898a1c33bed7267 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6f3b7e07231c0f3e116c99c493bdda98ecd52313b6735faa6cea23815cf3162b +size 7190 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d9560dd17607ab2fc24aec279c4072fa73a0c7b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1a9c1d3494b2efb2724dd80f2d1e687b80a48198bae20b3deac33be00615f5df +size 17155 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cda690c973da6cc312b92cefab89bfdc1fc1f7a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fd3db39a9bb29c26b67148ee8eb2d698985b7831b2d67a88e70d77f39c006556 +size 15896 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/18442e4e239480f0c3c95b547aa8fde2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/18442e4e239480f0c3c95b547aa8fde2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3020b599fc6191f0f2a89d20e7f7b4dbf858152b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/18442e4e239480f0c3c95b547aa8fde2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2955e5c6fd62c7a3c71ba230bc84061ce7ccfd499b07e83a35395fdeab60c9f3 +size 16279 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9adc78e9f96b9198ef66f17b24d32e56c95f5e54 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5503dbed9e86d6d0ac6f97e0cf4704cc3fe7144a9ade02607833338a78440b13 +size 18176 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8907fe90f590c34322c9d4fb2d95916f944dc16b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:22de40855ccf14494f84d173db99eff99a0d50dc5d9ea3389ff7782288c98906 +size 16094 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52826b07848b38a04f9162d7370dd2d122175598 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9517cb4e4c8797947fe8e0d621644904a5ee06471a6387386ac7168c00f4a29d +size 17980 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b7491250c85e7f48948113cebd68307b2f4560b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.4161-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,731 @@ + + +# Recommendation **ITU-T Q.4161 (12/2023)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +Protocols and signalling for Quantum key distribution networks + +--- + +# **Protocols for Ak interfaces for quantum key distribution networks** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font overlaid on the globe. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS | Q.4160-Q.4179 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.4161 + +# Protocols for Ak interfaces for quantum key distribution networks + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.4161 specifies protocols for Ak interfaces in quantum key distribution networks. + +## History \* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.4161 | 2023-12-14 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/15755 | + +## Keywords + +Message parameters, protocol, QKD (quantum key distribution), QKDN (QKD network), signalling procedure. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2024 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation ..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Ak interface ..... | 3 | +| 7 Signalling procedure..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Signalling procedure for key supply upon request mode ..... | 3 | +| 7.2 Signalling procedure for proactive key supply mode..... | 4 | +| 8 Signalling messages and parameters ..... | 6 | +| 8.1 Messages and parameters for key supply upon request mode..... | 6 | +| 8.2 Messages and parameters for proactive key supply mode ..... | 7 | +| 9 Security considerations ..... | 11 | +| Appendix I – Protocol implementation using the transmission control protocol ..... | 12 | +| Appendix II – Protocol implementation for key supply upon request mode using
hypertext transfer protocol secure ..... | 14 | +| II.1 Key request message ..... | 14 | +| II.2 Key request with identifier message..... | 14 | +| II.3 Response to key request message..... | 15 | +| Bibliography..... | 16 | + + + +###### Recommendation ITU-T Q.4161 + +###### Protocols for Ak interfaces for quantum key distribution networks + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation specifies protocols for Ak interfaces for quantum key distribution networks (QKDNs) especially in the following areas: + +- signalling procedures; +- signalling messages and parameters; +- security considerations. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-T Q.4160] Recommendation ITU-T Q.4160 (2023), *Quantum key distribution networks – Protocol framework*. + +[ITU-T X.1712] Recommendation ITU-T X.1712 (2021), *Security requirements and measures for QKD networks – Key management*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 key management** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: All activities performed on keys during their life cycle starting from their reception from the quantum layer, storage, formatting, relay, synchronization, authentication, to supply to cryptographic application and deletion or preservation depending on the key management policy. + +**3.1.2 key management agent (KMA)** [b-ITU-T Y.3802]: A functional element to manage keys generated by one or multiple quantum key distribution (QKD) modules in a QKD node (trusted node). + +**3.1.3 key manager (KM)** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A functional module located in a quantum key distribution (QKD) node to perform key management in the key management layer. + +**3.1.4 key relay** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A method to share keys between arbitrary quantum key distribution (QKD) nodes via intermediate QKD node(s). + +**3.1.5 key supply agent (KSA)** [b-ITU-T Y.3802]: A functional element to supply keys to a cryptographic application, being located between a key management agent (KMA) and the cryptographic application. + +NOTE – Application interfaces for cryptographic applications are installed into the key supply agent (KSA). The KSA synchronizes keys, and verifies their integrity via a KSA link before supplying them to the cryptographic application. + +**3.1.6 key supply agent-key (KSA-key)** [b-ITU-T Y.3803]: Key data stored and processed in a key supply agent (KSA), and securely shared between a KSA and a matching KSA. + +**3.1.7 quantum key distribution** [b-ETSI GR QKD 007]: Procedure or method for generating and distributing symmetrical cryptographic keys with information theoretical security based on quantum information theory. + +**3.1.8 quantum key distribution link** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A communication link between two quantum key distribution (QKD) modules to operate the QKD. + +NOTE – A QKD link consists of a quantum channel for the transmission of quantum signals, and a classical channel used to exchange information for synchronization and key distillation. + +**3.1.9 quantum key distribution module** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A set of hardware and software components that implements cryptographic functions and quantum optical processes, including quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, synchronization, distillation for key generation, and is contained within a defined cryptographic boundary. + +NOTE – A QKD module is connected to a QKD link, acting as an endpoint module in which a key is generated. These are two types of QKD modules, namely, the transmitters (QKD-Tx) and the receivers (QKD-Rx). + +**3.1.10 quantum key distribution network (QKDN)** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A network comprised of two or more quantum key distribution (QKD) nodes connected through QKD links. + +NOTE – A QKDN allows sharing keys between the QKD nodes by key relay when they are not directly connected by a QKD link. + +**3.1.11 quantum key distribution node** [b-ITU-T Y.3800]: A node that contains one or more quantum key distribution (QKD) modules protected against intrusion and attacks by unauthorized parties. + +NOTE – A QKD node can contain a key manager (KM). + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-------|------------------------------------| +| HTTPS | Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure | +| ID | Identifier | +| KM | Key Manager | +| KMA | Key Management Agent | +| KSA | Key Supply Agent | +| QKD | Quantum Key Distribution | +| QKDN | Quantum Key Distribution Network | +| Rx | Receiver | +| TCP | Transmission Control Protocol | +| TLS | Transport Layer Security | +| Tx | Transmitter | + +# 5 Conventions + +None. + +# 6 Ak interface + +Reference point Ak connects a cryptographic application and a key supply function in a KSA. It is responsible for sending key requests from the cryptographic application to the KSA, performing authentication between the cryptographic application and the KSA, and supplying keys from the KSA to the cryptographic application. + +# 7 Signalling procedure + +The following two modes are specified for key request and key supply at the Ak interface. + +- 1) Key supply upon request mode: Both KMs on the source and destination sides initiate key supplies after receiving key requests from the corresponding cryptographic applications. +- 2) Proactive key supply mode: The KM on the source side initiates key supply upon request, and then instructs the KM on the destination side to supply a key proactively. + +NOTE – The proactive key supply mode can be adopted in scenarios where the cryptographic applications on both sides are restricted to have no direct communication before they have KSA-keys. + +Examples of signalling procedure of key request, key relay, and key supply in QKDN are described in Appendix I of [ITU-T Q.4160]. The protocol suites applied for the signalling are specified in clause 7 of [ITU-T Q.4160]. + +## 7.1 Signalling procedure for key supply upon request mode + +### 7.1.1 Key request on the source side + +When a cryptographic application needs keys for encryption, it sends a key request to the KM, which then supplies keys. If the KM does not have a sufficient number of keys in storage, it initiates key generation or key relay to share the necessary number, and supplies them to the cryptographic applications when their generation or relay is completed. + +Figure 1 shows signalling procedures for key request at the Ak interface on the source side. + +![Sequence diagram showing the signalling procedure for a key request at the Ak interface on the source side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Key request' message to the KM, and the KM responds with a 'Response to key request' message.](0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg) + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant Cryptographic application + participant KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + Cryptographic application->>KM: Key request + KM-->>Cryptographic application: Response to key request +``` + +Sequence diagram showing the signalling procedure for a key request at the Ak interface on the source side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Key request' message to the KM, and the KM responds with a 'Response to key request' message. + +**Figure 1 – Signalling procedures for key request at the Ak interface on the source side** + +### 7.1.2 Key request with identifier on the destination side + +The destination cryptographic application requests a key from the KM to which it is connected. The destination cryptographic application sends a request with the key identifier (ID) that is received from the source cryptographic application in order to specify the key. + +Figure 2 shows signalling procedures for a key request with ID at the Ak interface on the destination side. + +![Sequence diagram showing key request and response between a Cryptographic application and a KM.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant CA as Cryptographic application + participant KM as KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + CA->>KM: Key request with ID + KM-->>CA: Response to key request + +``` + +The diagram illustrates a sequence of messages between a Cryptographic application and a KM. The Cryptographic application sends a 'Key request with ID' to the KM, and the KM responds with a 'Response to key request'. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4161(23)' at the bottom right. + +Sequence diagram showing key request and response between a Cryptographic application and a KM. + +**Figure 2 – Signalling procedures for a key request with identifier at the Ak interface on the destination side** + +## 7.2 Signalling procedure for proactive key supply mode + +### 7.2.1 Session creation on the source side + +When a cryptographic application needs keys for encryption, it first sends a session creation request to the KM on the source side. The source KM then notifies the KM on the destination side to create a session and responds with a session ID to the source cryptographic application when the session is successfully created. Based on the session created, the source cryptographic application can request keys from the source KM. + +Figure 3 shows signalling procedures for a session creation at the Ak interface on the source side. + +![Sequence diagram showing session creation request and response between a Cryptographic application and a KM.](053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant CA as Cryptographic application + participant KM as KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + CA->>KM: Session creation request + KM-->>CA: Response to session creation request + +``` + +The diagram illustrates a sequence of messages between a Cryptographic application and a KM. The Cryptographic application sends a 'Session creation request' to the KM, and the KM responds with a 'Response to session creation request'. The diagram is labeled 'Q.4161(23)' at the bottom right. + +Sequence diagram showing session creation request and response between a Cryptographic application and a KM. + +**Figure 3 – Signalling procedures for session creation at the Ak interface on the source side** + +### 7.2.2 Session creation on the destination side + +The destination cryptographic application receives a session creation notification from the KM to which it is connected. The destination KM sends the notification with the session ID that is received from the source KM in order to specify the session. + +Figure 4 shows signalling procedures for session creation at the Ak interface on the destination side. + +![Sequence diagram for session creation at the destination side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Session creation notification' to a KM, which responds with a 'Response to session creation notification'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23).](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Cryptographic application + participant KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + KM->>Cryptographic application: Session creation notification + Cryptographic application-->>KM: Response to session creation notification + +``` + +Sequence diagram for session creation at the destination side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Session creation notification' to a KM, which responds with a 'Response to session creation notification'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23). + +**Figure 4 – Signalling procedures for session creation at the Ak interface on the destination side** + +### 7.2.3 Key request with session identifier on the source side + +With a created session, the KM on the source side supplies KSA-keys on request from the source cryptographic application. + +Figure 5 shows signalling procedure for a key request with a session ID at the Ak interface on the source side. + +![Sequence diagram for key request with session identifier at the source side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Key request with session ID' to a KM, which responds with a 'Response to key request with session ID'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23).](7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Cryptographic application + participant KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + Cryptographic application->>KM: Key request with session ID + KM-->>Cryptographic application: Response to key request with session ID + +``` + +Sequence diagram for key request with session identifier at the source side. A Cryptographic application sends a 'Key request with session ID' to a KM, which responds with a 'Response to key request with session ID'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23). + +**Figure 5 – Signalling procedures for key request with session identifier at the Ak interface on the source side** + +### 7.2.4 Proactive key supply on the destination side + +The KM on the destination side proactively supplies KSA-keys to the destination cryptographic application to which it is connected. This scheme is applicable when the key request from the source cryptographic application is received by the source KM, which then instructs the destination KM to supply a key proactively. + +Figure 6 shows signalling procedures for proactive key supply at the Ak interface on the destination side. + +![Sequence diagram for proactive key supply at the destination side. A KM sends a 'Proactive key supply' to a Cryptographic application, which responds with a 'Response to proactive key supply'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23).](18442e4e239480f0c3c95b547aa8fde2_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Cryptographic application + participant KM + Note right of KM: Q.4161(23) + KM->>Cryptographic application: Proactive key supply + Cryptographic application-->>KM: Response to proactive key supply + +``` + +Sequence diagram for proactive key supply at the destination side. A KM sends a 'Proactive key supply' to a Cryptographic application, which responds with a 'Response to proactive key supply'. The diagram is labeled Q.4161(23). + +**Figure 6 – Signalling procedures for proactive key supply at the Ak interface on the destination side** + +# 8 Signalling messages and parameters + +This clause specifies messages and their parameters for the Ak interface. + +The M/O columns of Tables 1 to 11 relate to signalling of the parameter in columns 1; M indicates mandatory and O indicates optional. + +The messages and parameters specified in this clause are independent of a specific protocol and can have different implementations. The recommended protocol implementations are described in Appendices I and II. + +NOTE – A message parameter described in Tables 1 to 11 is not necessarily mapped to a field in the message payload and might be part of the control parameters of a specific protocol. The data type listed in columns 3 of tables 1 to 11 may vary with specific protocols. + +## 8.1 Messages and parameters for key supply upon request mode + +### 8.1.1 Key request message + +A message is sent from the cryptographic application to the KM on the source side to request keys. + +Table 1 lists the parameters of a key request message. + +**Table 1 – Parameters of key request message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----|---------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | ID of the source cryptographic application (i.e., the application that sends this message) | String | O | | +| Application destination ID | ID of the destination cryptographic application (i.e., the application with which the source cryptographic application requests to communicate) | String | M | | +| Application name | Name of the cryptographic application | String | O | | +| Number of keys | Number of KSA-keys requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted | +| Size of key | Length of each KSA-key requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### 8.1.2 Key request with identifier message + +On receipt of the KSA-key, the source cryptographic application sends the corresponding key ID to the destination cryptographic application. The destination cryptographic application sends a request to the destination KM with the key ID. The destination cryptographic application then receives the key that has been shared between the source and destination KMs. + +Table 2 lists the parameters of a key request with an ID message. + +**Table 2 – Parameters of a key request with identifier message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | ID of the source cryptographic application | String | M | | +| Application destination ID | ID of the destination cryptographic application (i.e., the application that sends this message) | String | O | | +| Application name | Name of the cryptographic application | String | O | | +| Key IDs | IDs of the KSA-keys requested | Array of objects | M | These IDs are notified from the source cryptographic application | +| Key ID | ID of the KSA-key requested | String | M | | +| Key ID extension | Extensions to key ID | Object | O | | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### 8.1.3 Response to key request message + +A response to a key request message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application in response to the key request or the key request with ID from the cryptographic application. The KM supplies the requested KSA-keys to the cryptographic application. There is no difference between the source side and the destination side for the response to the key request. + +Table 3 lists the parameters of a response to a key request message. + +**Table 3 – Parameters of response to key request message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|---------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------|-----|-------------------------------| +| Keys | Key file consists of key data and metadata. | Array of objects | M | | +| Key | KSA-key data provided for the request | String | M | | +| Key ID | ID of the KSA-key provided | String | M | | +| Key extension | Extensions to key file | Object | O | Hash value, etc. | +| Response | Result of key supply | String | M | Reason for success or failure | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +## 8.2 Messages and parameters for proactive key supply mode + +### 8.2.1 Session creation request message + +A session creation request message is sent from the cryptographic application to the KM on the source side. A session is created to facilitate key supply between the cryptographic applications and the KMs on both sides. + +Table 4 lists the parameters of a session creation request message. + +**Table 4 – Parameters of session creation request message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | ID of the source cryptographic application (i.e., the application that sends this message) | String | M | | +| Application destination ID | ID of the destination cryptographic application (i.e., the application with which the source cryptographic application requests to communicate) | String | M | | +| Application name | Name of the source cryptographic application | String | O | | +| Number of keys | Number of KSA-keys requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted.
This parameter can be used as the maximum number of KSA-keys requested during one session | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### 8.2.2 Response to session creation request message + +The response to a session creation request message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application on the source side. On receipt of a session creation request, the source KM notifies the KM on the destination side to create a session and responds with a session ID to the source cryptographic application when the session is successfully created. + +Table 5 lists the parameters of a response to a session creation request message. + +**Table 5 – Parameters of response to session creation request message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Response | Result of the creation of the session | String | M | Success, failure reason, or status table of key supply | +| Source KM ID | ID of the source KM | String | O | | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### 8.2.3 Session creation notification message + +A session creation notification message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application on the destination side. The destination KM proactively sends the session ID to the destination cryptographic application and notifies it with the ID of the source cryptographic application requesting to communicate with it. + +Table 6 lists the parameters of a session creation notification message. + +**Table 6 – Parameters of session creation notification message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | ID of the source cryptographic application (i.e., the application that receives this message) | String | M | | +| Application destination ID | ID of the destination cryptographic application (i.e., the application with which the source cryptographic application requests to communicate) | String | M | | +| Application name | Name of the source cryptographic application | String | O | | +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Number of keys | Number of KSA-keys requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted.
This parameter can be used as the maximum number of KSA-keys requested during one session | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### **8.2.4 Response to session creation notification message** + +A response to a session creation notification message is sent from the cryptographic application to the KM in response to the session creation notification on the destination side. The destination cryptographic application notifies the result of the creation of the session to the destination KM. + +Table 7 lists the parameters of a response to a session creation notification message. + +**Table 7 – Parameters of response to session creation notification message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Response | Result of the creation of the session | String | M | Reason for success or failure | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### **8.2.5 Key request with session identifier message** + +With a created session, the cryptographic application sends a key request with session ID message to the KM on the source side. The source KM then supplies the requested KSA-keys to the source cryptographic application during the session. + +Table 8 lists the parameters of a key request with a session ID message. + +**Table 8 – Parameters of key request with session identifier message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|----------------|----------------------------------|------------------|-----|---------------------------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Number of keys | Number of KSA-keys requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted | +| Size of key | Length of each KSA-key requested | Integer | O | A default value is applied if omitted | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### **8.2.6 Response to key request with session identifier message** + +A response to a key request with a session ID message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application on the source side. The source KM then supplies the requested KSA-keys to the source cryptographic application during the created session. + +Table 9 lists the parameters of a response to a key request with a session ID message. + +**Table 9 – Parameters of response to key request with session identifier message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|------------------|-----|-------------------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Keys | Key file consists of key data and metadata | Array of objects | M | | +| Key | KSA-key data provided for the request | String | M | | +| Key ID | ID of the KSA-key provided | String | M | | +| Key extension | Extensions to key file | Object | O | Hash value, etc. | +| Response | Result of key supply | String | M | Reason for success or failure | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### **8.2.7 Proactive key supply message** + +A proactive key supply message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application on the destination side. The destination KM proactively supplies the KSA-key to the destination cryptographic application during the created session. + +Table 10 lists the parameters of a proactive key supply message. + +**Table 10 – Parameters of proactive key supply message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|---------------|--------------------------------------------|------------------|-----|------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Keys | Key file consists of key data and metadata | Array of objects | M | | +| Key | KSA-key data supplied | String | M | | +| Key ID | ID of the KSA-key supplied | String | M | | +| Key extension | Extensions to key file | Object | O | Hash value, etc. | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +### 8.2.8 Response to proactive key supply message + +A response to a proactive key supply message is sent from the cryptographic application to the KM in response to proactive key supply on the destination side. The destination cryptographic application notifies the receipt of the KSA-key to the destination KM. + +Table 11 lists the parameters of a response to proactive key supply message. + +**Table 11 – Parameters of response to proactive key supply message** + +| Parameter | Description | Data type | M/O | Remarks | +|------------|--------------------------------------|------------------|-----|-------------------------------| +| Session ID | ID of the session created | String | M | | +| Key ID | ID of the KSA-key received | String | M | | +| Response | Result of the receipt of the KSA-key | String | M | Reason for success or failure | +| Extension | Array of extension parameters | Array of objects | O | | + +# 9 Security considerations + +Key data and associated metadata are transferred through an Ak reference point. Security requirements and measures to protect them are specified in [ITU-T X.1712]. + +# Appendix I + +## Protocol implementation using the transmission control protocol + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +This appendix describes an implementation using the transmission control protocol (TCP) for messages and parameters that are described in clause 8. + +NOTE 1 – Some parameters are mapped to a part of the control information of the protocol instead of being mapped to a field in the data payload. + +The cryptographic application can connect to the KM using the TCP [b-IETF RFC 9293]. The corresponding message format over the TCP is shown in Figure I.1. + +| Version | MessageID | CommandCode | Length | Payload | +|---------|-----------|-------------|--------|---------| +|---------|-----------|-------------|--------|---------| + +Q.4161(23) + +**Figure I.1 – Message format over the transmission control protocol** + +In Figure I.1: + +Version: the current version of the message format adopted, 2 bytes; + +MessageID: the unique ID of each message, 4 bytes; + +CommandCode: a unique code that denotes different command/response messages transferred at the Ak interface, 2 bytes; + +Length: the length of the message payload, 2 bytes; + +Payload: the message parameters of a specific command/response message, JavaScript object notation data format [b-IETF RFC 8259]. + +NOTE 2 – The transport layer security (TLS) protocol [b-IETF RFC 5246] can be implemented with the TCP for enhanced security. + +On establishment of the connection, mutual authentication between the cryptographic application and the KM is performed. After mutual authentication, a command/response message can be transferred via the Ak interface for key request and key supply. + +NOTE 3 – When applying the TLS protocol, the cryptographic application can verify the validity of a certificate the KM possesses and based on that confirm the ID of the KM it is connecting to. Similarly, the KM can verify the validity of a certificate the cryptographic application possesses and based on that confirm the ID of the connecting cryptographic application. + +Table I.1 lists CommandCode vs. command/response message name. + +**Table I.1 – CommandCode vs. command/response message name** + +| CommandCode | Command/response message name | +|-------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 0x2101 | Key request | +| 0x2102 | Key request with ID | +| 0x1203 | Response to key request | +| 0x2104 | Session creation request | +| 0x1205 | Response to session creation request | +| 0x1206 | Session creation notification | +| 0x2107 | Response to session creation notification | + +**Table I.1 – CommandCode vs. command/response message name** + +| CommandCode | Command/response message name | +|--------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| 0x2108 | Key request with session ID | +| 0x1209 | Response to key request with session ID | +| 0x120A | Proactive key supply | +| 0x210B | Response to proactive key supply | + +The first two digits "12" in a CommandCode indicate that the corresponding message is sent from the KM to the cryptographic application; "21" indicate that the corresponding message is sent from the cryptographic application to the KM. + +# Appendix II + +## Protocol implementation for key supply upon request mode using hypertext transfer protocol secure + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +The signalling messages and parameters for key supply upon request mode specified in clause 8.1 can be implemented using hypertext transfer protocol secure (HTTPS) according to the protocol and data format of the representational state transfer-based key delivery application programming interface specified in [b-ETSI GS QKD 014]. This appendix describes the mapping of the messages and parameters specified in clause 8.1 to the corresponding data format specified in [b-ETSI GS QKD 014]. + +NOTE – In this implementation, the cryptographic application and the KM correspond to the secure application entity (SAE) and the key management entity defined in [b-ETSI GS QKD 014], respectively. + +## II.1 Key request message + +In this implementation, the key request message specified in clause 8.1.1 corresponds to the HTTPS request of the HTTPS transaction performed as the Get Key method specified in [b-ETSI GS QKD 014]. Table II.1 lists the mapping of the key request message to the Get Key method. + +**Table II.1 – Mapping of key request message to Get Key method** + +| Parameter | M/O | Data type | Implementation in Get Key method | +|----------------------------|-----|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | O | String | None | +| Application destination ID | M | String | "{target_SAE_ID}" part of the access URL | +| Application name | O | String | None | +| Number of keys | O | Integer | The "number" item in the key request data format | +| Size of key | O | Integer | The "size" item in the key request data format | +| Extension | O | Array of objects | The "extension_mandatory" or "extension_optional" item in the Key request data format | + +## II.2 Key request with identifier message + +In this implementation, the key request with ID message specified in clause 8.1.2 corresponds to the HTTPS request of the HTTPS transaction performed as the Get Key with ID method specified in [b-ETSI GS QKD 014]. Table II.2 lists the mapping of the key request with ID message to the Get Key with ID method. + +**Table II.2 – Mapping of key request with identifier message to Get Key with ID method** + +| Parameter | M/O | Data type | Implementation in Get Key with ID method | +|----------------------------|-----|------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| Application source ID | M | String | "{initiator_SAE_ID}" part of the access URL | +| Application destination ID | O | String | None | +| Application name | O | String | None | +| Key IDs | M | Array of objects | The "key_IDs" item in the key ID data format | + +**Table II.2 – Mapping of key request with identifier message +to Get Key with ID method** + +| Parameter | M/O | Data type | Implementation in Get Key with ID method | +|------------------|------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| Key ID | M | String | The "key_ID" item in the key ID data format | +| Key ID extension | O | Object | The "key_ID_extension" item in the key ID data format | +| Extension | O | Array of objects | The "key_IDs_extension" item in the key ID data format | + +## **II.3 Response to key request message** + +In this implementation, the response to a key request message specified in clause 8.1.3 corresponds to the HTTPS response of the HTTPS transaction performed as the Get Key method or the Get Key with ID method. Table II.3 lists the mapping of the response to a key request message to the Get Key method or the Get Key with ID method. + +**Table II.3 – Mapping of response to key request message +to Get Key/Get Key with ID method** + +| Parameter | M/O | Data type | Implementation in Get Key or
Get Key with ID method
| +|------------------|------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Keys | M | Array of objects | The "keys" item in the key container data format | +| Key | M | String | The "key" item in the key container data format | +| Key ID | M | String | The "key_ID" item in the key container data format | +| Key extension | O | Object | The "key_ID_extension" item in the key container data format | +| Response | M | String | The status code of HTTPS transaction performed as Get Key method or Get Key with ID method | +| Extension | O | Array of objects | The "key_container_extension" item in the key container data format | + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T Y.3800] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3800 (2019), *Overview on networks supporting quantum key distribution*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.3802] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3802 (2020), *Quantum key distribution networks – Functional architecture*. +- [b-ITU-T Y.3803] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3803 (2020), *Quantum key distribution networks – Key management*. +- [b-ETSI GR QKD 007] Group Report ETSI GR QKD 007 V1.1.1 (2018), *Quantum key distribution (QKD); Vocabulary*. +- [b-ETSI GS QKD 014] Group Specification ETSI GS QKD 014 V1.1.1 (2019), *Quantum key distribution (QKD); Protocol and data format of REST-based key delivery API*. +- [b-IETF RFC 5246] IETF RFC 5246 (2008), *The transport layer security (TLS) protocol – Version 1.2*. +- [b-IETF RFC 8259] IETF RFC 8259 (2017), *The JavaScript object notation (JSON) data interchange format*. +- [b-IETF RFC 9293] IETF RFC 9293 (2022), *Transmission control protocol (TCP)*. + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af920838b045395fb253b78a4f46659ee66572b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/0bf9346902e9a3bdabf05ceacc1947f5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:20b124b6c35626582ba9f98b79012a0035ff94f28061e36fdd90ab94aad0b9df +size 57775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..104a57fbd03964ffd2520508b2be42e03343d20f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2468dfa77e8d32611a5fe8a2ebb904676994eeb54463226fd865698560c960c +size 8232 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8056c6dfe9a04ac3f56db5d1bc8852337a1522f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/7affafe7362a2d2d072e9d4bf515f0bb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dd9147221ed82a422cc0ac499cd6c46b566ba90e3e8a5e0b200e7cf5dd507cfe +size 22547 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdd970954818a0a5cea392e857970e7451ad76a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:97592b5cc564ac636f728be5b192b9ae4f16703a17b2c8815ae707732f068e8b +size 60114 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe28bcaa333168932ab752634e008a4f5487816f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4845883738431dd513e644c338054ca4897108888ca806fa7ea202b8fc3505e9 +size 23708 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cab0834804fb031b43865554cc8d06ab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cab0834804fb031b43865554cc8d06ab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db7ed50d600b716d4be2ff7cab3f45a9066e7c42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cab0834804fb031b43865554cc8d06ab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:12ebd51035b467e6a9456eb65aad7b9e403023db114cb8bd757f34c6703124a7 +size 38930 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0922ce0a238a0effb89fb1607accbd0dcc32bde8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.50-200107-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e7d6b1fc913c74177f46a8476afe7d312b8f6c7a272aa671bbad952840449925 +size 59453 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e32f9b8f1141bed243c16e02a6cd1411cbb87f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/14a22f23ced8ba1d63ece69861dbaacc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c395c4bbde83b1e232652a43f51538278c116f51f710c37e20a073f7333726c8 +size 6134 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..028fcc8e5266f704bd616992cb8ac6dd36723505 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:13b79cec75db8a12d4f151c5eecf005442725aeeb026cb1e469c2348ac8742ed +size 20340 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e283d98589af0d29fb39fea1ff6971eb869db97e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ad081595a90b69ccee9af30590e2a79d4c4e41e30d188c3843ed4b0bdcd13b10 +size 11348 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/54fabc351eda5228d2fa28cd9ba07971_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/54fabc351eda5228d2fa28cd9ba07971_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9182fde5407a2d074d0986ebaa246081a0349a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/54fabc351eda5228d2fa28cd9ba07971_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d41eb434f4d629713d6da800f6a7354b4de6396b27a275e6e7e023508eeeed97 +size 27321 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b57dcee2a63c539a11a19cd25bd0b8da5c49cfd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f3d8aaecfdcb980ae276fc7e43dd0c2eb07ae3cdd9b5b27742992d558e62aa77 +size 27393 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a25e8eac26492b20781190dbf3d95332719d841a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7c97be65179827d337dafb2802113b21fb12aba741d50a6d8a3e4b835449b982 +size 80175 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eed332dba580e01bbca7403f7e280ee80fee5340 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3a7e37592becf17d5b4467b808ebb22cea0a59ca21c373ea72424980f11f1fa4 +size 31620 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee8e50c7d1704db64e6d57f60aaa149825cf109e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5003-202202-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,496 @@ + + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.5003** + +(02/2022) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND +ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS + +Signalling requirements and protocols for IMT-2020 – +Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 + +# --- **Signalling requirements and architecture for federated multiaccess edge computing** + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.5003 + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS AND TESTS** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710–Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900–Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100–Q.4139 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5049 | +| Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 | Q.5000–Q.5019 | +| Protocols for IMT-2020 | Q.5020–Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050–Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.5003 + +# Signalling requirements and architecture for federated multiaccess edge computing + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.5003 describes signalling requirements and architecture for federated multiaccess edge computing (MEC). This Recommendation specifies signalling requirements, signalling architecture with reference points and security considerations for federated MEC. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.5003 | 2022-02-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/14925 | + +## Keywords + +Federated MEC, MEC platform, multiaccess edge computing. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, . + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2022 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 1 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Overview..... | 2 | +| 7 Architecture and signalling requirements..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Architectural model for federated MEC..... | 3 | +| 7.2 Signalling requirement for reference point MS..... | 7 | +| 7.3 Signalling requirement for reference point MA ..... | 8 | +| 7.4 Signalling requirement for reference point MM ..... | 8 | +| 7.5 Signalling requirement for reference point MP ..... | 9 | +| 7.6 Signalling requirement for reference point MI..... | 9 | +| 7.7 Signalling requirement for reference point MMe..... | 10 | +| 7.8 Signalling requirement for reference point MPe ..... | 10 | +| 8 Security considerations ..... | 10 | +| Appendix I – Use case of the federated MEC..... | 11 | +| I.1 Federation for easy onboarding of application package..... | 11 | +| I.2 Federation for supporting consistent user experience across the MEC
provider's coverage..... | 11 | +| I.3 Federation for connecting services deployed on different MEC system..... | 12 | +| Bibliography..... | 13 | + + + +## Recommendation ITU-T Q.5003 + +# Signalling requirements and architecture for federated multiaccess edge computing + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the application layer architecture and architectural requirements for the federated multiaccess edge computing (MEC). The scope of this Recommendation covers: + +- Signalling architecture; +- Signalling requirements. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +None. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 multiaccess edge computing** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: System which provides an IT service environment and cloud-computing capabilities at the edge of an access network which contains one or more type of access technology, and in close proximity to its users. + +**3.1.2 MEC application** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: Application that can be instantiated on an MEC host within the MEC system and can potentially provide or consume MEC services. + +**3.1.3 MEC platform** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: Collection of functionality that is required to run MEC applications on a specific MEC host virtualization infrastructure and to enable them to provide and consume MEC services, and that can itself provide a number of MEC services. + +**3.1.4 MEC service** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: Service provided via the MEC platform either by the MEC platform itself or by an MEC application. + +**3.1.5 lifecycle management** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: Set of functions required to manage the instantiation, maintenance and termination of an MEC application instance. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following term: + +**3.2.1 federated MEC**: A group of multiaccess edge computing systems that belong to several multiaccess edge computing providers, and which jointly provide a unified service across these providers to respond to requests received from application providers by exchanging resources from all of the individual multiaccess edge computing systems. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|-----------------------------| +| COTS | Commercial-Off-The-Shelf | +| FE | Functional Entity | +| HW | Hardware | +| IaaS | Infrastructure as a Service | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| MA | MEC Aggregation | +| MAL | MEC Aggregation Layer | +| MEC | Multiaccess Edge Computing | +| MeML | MEC Management Layer | +| MIL | MEC Infrastructure Layer | +| MNO | Mobile Network Operator | +| MPL | MEC Platform Layer | +| PaaS | Platform as a Service | +| QoE | Quality of Experience | +| SaaS | Software as a Service | +| SDK | Software Development Kit | +| SLA | Service Level Agreement | +| SW | Software | +| UE | User Equipment | +| URL | Uniform Resource Locator | + +# 5 Conventions + +None. + +# 6 Overview + +Multiaccess Edge Computing (MEC) providers have been developing the MEC services and platform separately using different technologies for different vertical domains, which may bring significant drawbacks. They have to deal with specific signalling flows for different interfaces to interwork with different service platforms, which may significantly increase the complexity for the MEC providers. Therefore, there is a strong necessary to specify an architecture with a signalling convergence to provide unified MEC services across different MEC providers, which can be fulfilled by federated MEC. + +Federated MEC is a model which can provide a unified MEC service across MEC providers by exchanging the resources (e.g., cloud-computing resources, network capabilities) of each MEC system and requests from application providers. + +Federated MEC mainly provides the following three functionalities: + +- Authenticating, authorizing each MEC system and sharing its capabilities: This is needed for MEC providers to authenticate and authorize each other and share information related to each MEC system's catalogue with network resources, computing resources, etc. + +- Discovering appropriate MEC systems: When a user moves to another region during MEC service or an application provider requests to interconnect with another application provider, it is supported that each MEC provider discover different MEC systems based on the registered information to maintain the quality that MEC service can originally provide. +- Communicating between MEC systems: After discovering, communicating between MEC systems is supported. Basically, the content type delivered over the communication is not limited, and it can also support the delivery of application packages and application contexts, or the exchange of some media (text, audio or video). + +In this Recommendation, the architectural model and signalling requirements for federated MEC are specified in clause 7; the relevant security considerations in clause 8; and selected use cases for federated MEC are described in Appendix I. + +Note that the concept of MEC federation is also discussed in the other SDOs, e.g., GSMA OPG and ETSI ISG MEC; and there are other relevant specifications [b-GSMA] [b-ETSI GS MEC 035] being developed. + +# 7 Architecture and signalling requirements + +The MEC system is responsible for 1) serving MEC service and application providers' request to host their instances in the network edge; and 2) supporting an end-user to access via user equipment (UE) the MEC services and applications deployed in the MEC infrastructure. + +In order to serve the UE registered or moving to different MEC systems, the MEC service and application providers need to interact with the different MEC systems via different interfaces, contract, policies, Service Level Agreement (SLA), etc. + +In federated MEC, the interactions with MEC service and application providers are aggregated and the different MEC systems federate to deploy the MEC services and applications with no intervention at on-demand locations covered by different MEC providers. + +This clause specifies the architectural model for federated MEC, including signalling requirements for interactions among different functional entities and between different MEC systems. + +## 7.1 Architectural model for federated MEC + +The architectural model for federated MEC consists of four layers, including several functional entities in each layer: + +- MEC aggregation layer (MAL) is responsible for serving the MEC service and application providers' demands towards different MEC systems; +- MEC management layer (MeML) is responsible for the management of MEC services and applications; +- MEC platform layer (MPL) is responsible for provisioning and control of the connectivity to MEC services and applications; +- MEC Infrastructure Layer (MIL) is responsible for the management of the virtualized infrastructure. + +In the architectural model of federated MEC, there are six reference points defined to serve the interactions among the layers and external entities (i.e. MEC services and applications and UE): + +- MS reference point, for interactions between MEC services and applications and MAL; +- MA reference point, for interactions between MAL and MeML; +- MM reference point, for interactions between MAL and MeML; +- MMe reference point, for interactions between MeMLs of different MEC systems; +- MP reference point, for interactions between MPL and MIL; + +- MPe reference point, for interactions between MPLs of different MEC systems; +- MI reference point, for interactions between MIL and UE. + +The architectural model for federated MEC is illustrated in Figure 7-1. + +![Figure 7-1: Architectural model for federated MEC. The diagram shows a hierarchical structure of layers. At the top is 'MEC services and applications (B2C, B2B and B2B2X services)'. Below it is 'MAL (MEC aggregation layer, federated MEC)' connected via the 'MS reference point'. The MAL connects to two parallel 'MeML (MEC management layer)' blocks via the 'MA reference point'. Each MeML connects to an 'MPL (MEC platform layer)' via the 'MM reference point'. The two MPLs are connected to each other via the 'MMe reference point'. Each MPL connects to a 'MIL (MEC infrastructure layer)' via the 'MP reference point'. The two MILs are connected to each other via the 'MPe reference point'. Each MIL connects to a 'UE' block via the 'MI reference point'.](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-1: Architectural model for federated MEC. The diagram shows a hierarchical structure of layers. At the top is 'MEC services and applications (B2C, B2B and B2B2X services)'. Below it is 'MAL (MEC aggregation layer, federated MEC)' connected via the 'MS reference point'. The MAL connects to two parallel 'MeML (MEC management layer)' blocks via the 'MA reference point'. Each MeML connects to an 'MPL (MEC platform layer)' via the 'MM reference point'. The two MPLs are connected to each other via the 'MMe reference point'. Each MPL connects to a 'MIL (MEC infrastructure layer)' via the 'MP reference point'. The two MILs are connected to each other via the 'MPe reference point'. Each MIL connects to a 'UE' block via the 'MI reference point'. + +**Figure 7-1 – Architectural model for federated MEC** + +### 7.1.1 Functional entities and requirements + +This clause defines functional entities that require for each predefined layer. + +#### 7.1.1.1 MEC aggregation layer + +The MAL is responsible for different service providers' requirements over heterogeneous MEC with the functions described in Figure 7-2 and below. + +![Figure 7-2: Functional entities for the MEC aggregation layer. The diagram shows a box for 'MAL (MEC aggregation layer)' containing five functional entities in a grid: 'End-to-end orchestration', 'Catalogue', 'Authentication and authorization', 'Runtime', and 'Service repository'.](54fabc351eda5228d2fa28cd9ba07971_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-2: Functional entities for the MEC aggregation layer. The diagram shows a box for 'MAL (MEC aggregation layer)' containing five functional entities in a grid: 'End-to-end orchestration', 'Catalogue', 'Authentication and authorization', 'Runtime', and 'Service repository'. + +**Figure 7-2 – Functional entities for the MEC aggregation layer** + +- The end-to-end orchestration FE supports the lifecycle management of MEC infrastructure resources, platform functions, services and applications over the federation of heterogeneous operator specific MEC platform and management layers. The FE supports necessary functionalities for the services and application providers to deploy and manage their applications, such as to upload, update and delete application images with necessary information. These functionalities are performed with related FEs in MeML and MPL; For the direct interaction between MeMLs and between MPLs of federated MEC systems when, for example, supporting consistent user experience across the MEC provider's coverage or + +connecting services deployed on different MEC system and so on is required, the FE supports the discovery and selection of appropriate MEC system, datacentres and MEC platforms. + +- Catalogue FE manages the collection of operator specific MEC infrastructure resources, platform functions capabilities. +- Runtime FE manages the runtime information of federated MEC. The FE handles, over MeML, services and application providers' requests to subscribe the event notification and run time information related to the network and MEC resources. +- Service repository FE manages and handles the federated MEC services. +- Authentication and Authorization FE manages authentication of the operator specific federated MECs. + +#### 7.1.1.2 MEC management layer + +The MeML provides functionalities which are required for MEC network resource allocating tasks such as allocating cloud and network resources for each required MEC service (that may be in the same or a different MEC provider); see also Figure 7–3. MeML communicates with other MeML in a federated MEC system through an Exchange reference point between them, for example, for the direct delivery of an onboard application package to allow services and application providers of an MEC system to deploy their applications using the MEC resources and services of other federated MEC systems. Discovery and selection of appropriate target MEC systems and necessary information to establish the connection between the MeMLs is provided by end-to-end orchestration FE in the MAL. + +![Diagram of the MEC management layer (MeML) functional entities.](d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows the 'MeML (MEC management layer)' as a large rectangle containing six smaller dashed boxes arranged in a 2x3 grid. The top row contains 'Lifecycle management', 'Assurance management', and 'Service management'. The bottom row contains 'SLA management', 'Inventory management', and 'Authentication and authorization'. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5003(22)'. + +Diagram of the MEC management layer (MeML) functional entities. + +**Figure 7-3 – Functional entities for the MEC management layer** + +- The lifecycle management FE supports the on-boarding, instantiation, configuration, scaling and termination of the MEC application and services over the MEC platform. For federated MEC application and service deployment and management, application images and related information are provided by the end-to-end orchestration FE in the MAL or by the MeML of the peering federated MEC associated with the application provider directly. When UE moves, including in roaming scenarios, to the area where the required MEC service or services are not enabled, the FE supports the relocation of MEC instance(s) over MPL between federated MEC systems as well as in an MEC system. +- The assurance management FE provides a data collection, analytics, and report functionality that supports monitoring and tracking resource usage and application status, and so on. The FE reports runtime MEC information including network information and event notification to the subscribed services and application providers via the runtime FE in MAL. When the services and application provider is associated with another federated MEC system, the FE forwards the information to the MeML of the federated MEC system. +- SLA management supports service-level agreement monitoring risk management tools. + +- Inventory management FE manages MEC infrastructure resources, platform functions, service and application metadata and status, availabilities and so on; The FE supports direct delivery of onboard application packages to the other federated MEC system's lifecycle management FE through a reference point Exchange between MeMLs, allowing services and application providers of an MEC system to deploy their applications using the MEC resources and services of other federated MEC systems. +- The service management FE manages service information such as service profile, request handling, interaction management and so on. +- The authentication and authorization FE manages the authentication of MAL and authentication of itself to MAL, and it authorizes the MAL to interact with the operator specific federated MEC. + +#### 7.1.1.3 MEC platform layer + +The MPL provides functionalities which are required for MEC service processing tasks such as service discovery and service availability via other platforms (that may be in the same or a different MEC provider); see also Figure 7–4. The MPL communicates with other MPLs of federated MEC systems through an exchange reference point between them, as an example, for connecting services deployed on another MEC system platform. The discovery and selection of an appropriate MEC system platform and necessary information to establish the connection between them is provided by the end-to-end orchestration FE in the MAL. + +![Diagram of the MEC platform layer (MPL) showing four functional entities: Platform, Connectivity controller, Resource controller, and Topology controller.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the functional entities for the MEC platform layer (MPL). It is a rectangular box containing four smaller dashed boxes arranged in a 2x2 grid. The top-left box is labeled 'Platform', the top-right is 'Connectivity controller', the bottom-left is 'Resource controller', and the bottom-right is 'Topology controller'. Above the grid, the text 'MPL (MEC platform layer)' is centered. Below the diagram, the reference 'Q.5003(22)' is shown. + +Diagram of the MEC platform layer (MPL) showing four functional entities: Platform, Connectivity controller, Resource controller, and Topology controller. + +**Figure 7-4 – Functional entities for the MEC platform layer** + +- The platform functions FE supports operator platform specific functions that may contain operator specific APIs and IaaS/PaaS/SaaS functions. When a service request from the serving local MEC application is not locally available, the FE connects the local MEC application to the services on the appropriate other federated MEC system through an exchange reference point between MPLs. Discovery and selection of the appropriate federated MEC system and platform is performed by the MAL and MeML. +- The connectivity controller FE supports the MEC platform to control an operator's specific connectivity resources. +- The resource controller FE supports the MEC platform to control an operator's specific compute, network and storage resources considering the resource sharing policy between services or MEC service providers, and so on. The FE reports runtime MEC information including network information and event notification to the assurance FE in MeML for the use of subscribed service and application providers. +- The topology controller FE maintains both the physical network and virtual network. + +#### 7.1.1.4 MEC infrastructure layer + +The MIL provides a procedure for allocating and releasing virtualized (compute, storage and networking) resources of the virtualization infrastructure; see also Figure 7–5. + +![Diagram of MIL (MEC infrastructure layer) functional entities](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows the MIL (MEC infrastructure layer) as a large rectangle containing four dashed boxes arranged in a 2x2 grid. The top-left box is labeled 'Datacentre facility and capability information', the top-right is 'Connectivity resource', the bottom-left is 'Physical infrastructure resource', and the bottom-right is 'Virtual infrastructure resource'. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5003(22)'. + +Diagram of MIL (MEC infrastructure layer) functional entities + +**Figure 7-5 – Functional entities for the MEC infrastructure layer** + +- Datacentre facility and capability information FE manages various infrastructure information such as racks, shelves, network topology, HVAC capabilities and so on. +- Connectivity resource FE provides connectivity resource between multiaccess networks. +- Physical infrastructure resource FE manages resource information such as a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) servers, networks or storage hardware with special-purpose hardware components (e.g., AI inferencing accelerator). +- Virtual infra resource FE supports virtualized computing resources including virtual machine and container, network resources and storage resources that can be pooled and shared between services or dedicated to specific services. For the use of subscribed service and application providers, the FE collects and reports requested runtime MEC information including network information and event notification to the resource controller FE in the MPL. + +#### 7.1.1.5 UE + +UE provides capabilities and an SDK that support specific capabilities and equipment to interact with the MPL; see also Figure 7–6. + +![Diagram of UE functional entities](410562339ce067fdc6fa41940c118658_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows the UE as a large rectangle containing two dashed boxes arranged side-by-side. The left box is labeled 'UE capabilities' and the right box is labeled 'MEC SDK'. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5003(22)'. + +Diagram of UE functional entities + +**Figure 7-6 – Functional entities for UE** + +- The UE capabilities FE provides connectivity with the federated MEC by supporting the provisioning and discovery of MEC services and registration and authentication/authorization of the UE as an MEC client. It also supports retrieving UE-related information (e.g., UE location, application/connection status, measurement data) to the federated MEC for MEC service management such as triggering instantiation/termination of MEC applications or placing the MEC applications based on the UE location. +- MEC SDK FE provides a common software library for client-side MEC applications. + +## 7.2 Signalling requirement for reference point MS + +This clause describes the interface and messages between service providers and MEC aggregators which aims to deliver a service provider's services requirements to aggregators to distribute their services over multioperator MEC (e.g., service description and requirements — HW, SW, network requirement, etc). + +- It is required that reference point MS enable service and application providers to exchange request/response messages with the MAL for the deployment of their services and applications over operator MECs. +- It is recommended that reference point MS allow service and application providers to provide the required information for the optimized orchestration and deployment of their services and applications. The information may include MEC infrastructure requirements, MEC platform requirements, preferred region and data centre to deploy and service availability related requirements, etc. +- It is required that reference point MS enable service and application providers to exchange request/response messages with the MAL for the instantiation, monitoring, updating and deleting their application instances. +- It is required that reference point MS allow service and application providers to access the published catalogues of the operator MECs. The catalogue may include the collection of the operator specific MEC infrastructure resources, MEC platform function capabilities, MEC network capabilities (e.g., capacity, latency), etc. +- It is required that reference point MS allow service and application providers to upload, update and delete application images with necessary information for the instantiations and management of their applications. +- It is recommended that reference point MS allow service and application providers to subscribe to the network information related notification service provided by the operator MECs. The network information may include UE location, radio network information, application instance to UE connection status and traffic throughput, etc. + +## 7.3 Signalling requirement for reference point MA + +This clause describes the interface and messages between the aggregator and each operator's MEC to distribute a service provider's service requirements over heterogeneous MEC (e.g., operator's MEC, Public Cloud, etc.). + +- It is required that reference point MA allow the MAL to exchange request/response messages with the MeML for operator specific federated MEC resource and application information. The information may include collection of resource usage and application performance monitoring data, analytics and application status, etc. +- It is required that reference point MA allow the MAL to exchange request/response messages with the MeML for MEC service lifecycle management such as onboarding, instantiation, configuration, scaling and termination of the MEC application and services over one or more operator specific federated MEC platforms. +- It is required that reference point MA allow the MAL to interact with the MeML to handle service and application providers' MEC service requests. The MEC service request related information may include service profile and quality of service (QoS) requirements, etc. +- It is required that reference point MA enable the MAL and the MeML to authenticate each other. +- It is required that reference point MA allow MeML to authorize MAL to interact with the operator specific federated MEC. +- It is recommended that reference point MA allow MAL to exchange request/response messages with MeML, related to the discovery and selection of other federated MEC system, datacentres and MEC platforms, for the direct interaction between MeMLs and between MPLs of federated MEC systems through Exchange reference points. + +## 7.4 Signalling requirement for reference point MM + +This clause describes the interface and messages between the MeML and the MPL to manage and allocate each operator's cloud and network resources to an onboard service provider's services over each operator's MEC. + +- It is required that reference point MM allow the MeML to exchange request/response messages with the MPL for the enforcement of MEC application and service lifecycle management such as onboarding, instantiation, configuration, scaling and termination of them on the corresponding MEC platform. +- It is required that reference point MM allow the MeML to provide executable application images to the MPL for the instantiation of one or more MEC applications on the selected MEC platform(s). +- It is recommended that reference point MM allow the MPL to report run time MEC information including network information and event notification to the runtime FE in the MAL for the use of subscribed service and application providers. +- It is recommended that reference point MM support the relocation of MEC instances between federated MEC systems as well as in an MEC system when it is required. + +## 7.5 Signalling requirement for reference point MP + +This clause describes the interface and messages between the MPL and the MIL to control and allocate virtualized HW, SW and network related resources. + +- It is required that reference point MP allow the MPL to exchange request/response messages with the MIL to manage the infrastructure resources, such as setup and release of connectivity and physical/virtual infrastructure resources, etc., for the MEC applications and services running on the corresponding MEC platform. +- It is recommended that reference point MP enable the MPL to configure the QoS parameters of the specific MEC application traffic session provided by the connectivity resource in the MIL. +- It is recommended that reference point MP allow the MPL to enforce the routeing and traffic steering rules of MEC application traffic provided by the connectivity resource in the MIL. +- It is recommended that reference point MP allow the MPL to exchange request/response messages with the MIL to collect network related information and event notification. The information and event notification may include radio network performance information, charging and billing related data, network congestion, UE location and connection status, etc. +- It is recommended that reference point MP allow the MPL to exchange request/response messages with the MIL to collect physical/virtual infrastructure resource related information. The information may include infrastructure resource usage statistics, performance monitoring data, and a resource catalogue to be published by the MAL. + +## 7.6 Signalling requirement for reference point MI + +This clause describes the interface and messages between MEC service enabled UE and MEC. To guarantee stable QoS over multioperator MEC, the following factors have to be included: multiaccess capability, local breakout roaming scenario and MEC discovery over UE. + +- It is required that reference point MI enable UE to exchange request/response messages with operator specific federated MEC via the connectivity resource in the MIL to discover, register to and trigger the MEC service(s). The messages may include UE ID, MEC application ID, required UE capabilities, selected application instance access point information (e.g., URL or IP address), etc. + +- It is required that reference point MI enable UE to exchange request/response messages with operator specific federated MEC via the connectivity resource in the MIL to be authenticated and authorized itself. + +## 7.7 Signalling requirement for reference point MMe + +This clause describes the interface and messages between a neighbour operator's MeML to exchange service packet data or other messages (e.g., service requirements, service related data) if there is any necessity to sync up between different service servers based on each service's usage requirements. + +- It is recommended that reference point exchange MMe exchange request/response messages to share and update the information of available regions for the MEC service(s). The information may include region ID, name, geographical location, etc. +- It is recommended that reference point MMe allow the MeML of the local MEC system to deliver the MEC application package(s) and to forward the lifecycle management messages directly to the peering MeML of a remote federated MEC, allowing service and application providers of an MEC system to deploy their applications using the MEC resources and services of other federated MEC systems. The local MeML may provide a MEC application instantiation request, MEC application requirements and service repository data related to the MEC application, etc. to the federated remote MEC. +- It is recommended that reference point MMe allow the MeML of remote peering MeML of the federated MEC to forward the network information and event notification, etc. to the MeML of the local MEC system which delivers the forwarded information to the associated application provider. +- It is recommended that reference point MMe exchange request/response messages, in roaming scenario, etc., to support UE to register to the visited MEC service(s). The messages may include the user profile and authentication information, etc. + +## 7.8 Signalling requirement for reference point MPe + +This clause describes the interface and messages between a neighbour operator's MPL. + +- It is recommended that reference point MPe provide communication between the local MEC application and services on the peering federated MEC system. +- It is recommended that reference point MPe allow the MPL of the visited peer federated MEC to forward the network information (e.g., UE location and connection status), MEC resource usage/performance monitoring data and event notifications to the home MEC MPL, for the use of the MEC service and application provider. + +# 8 Security considerations + +This Recommendation provides signalling architecture and requirements for federated MEC environments. Thus, it is assumed that security considerations in general are based on the security framework from network function virtualization [b-ITU-T X.1046] and [b-ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022] and security requirements and architecture for network slice management and orchestration [b-ITU-T X.1047]. + +# Appendix I + +## Use case of the federated MEC + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +## I.1 Introduction + +MEC is considered a key successful factor in the 5G era that can provide a low latency user experience and huge data volume. In particular, latency sensitive services such as V2X, remote medical services and VR/AR services which have become popular nowadays are expected to have benefits from being hosted in the distributed cloud close to mobile network users. + +MEC services are typically envisaged as being offered and supplied by mobile network operators. Currently, these MEC systems have been developing separately and become different verticals, which will significantly increase the complexity for application providers in extending the reach of applications. + +To resolve this limitation, MEC providers need to adopt a federation model to interconnect each separated MEC with unified interfaces. The first approach is to make standardized APIs that will make application providers access various MEC systems effectively. In case of a single public cloud vendor, providing consistent QoE (quality of experience) is uncomplicated. However, it can be very useful to define standardized APIs in heterogeneous MEC systems created by multiple operators. Second, a federated MEC can help address poor MEC coverage. As the federated members share their network and resource capabilities and secure interfaces between their systems, the total MEC coverage can be extended and consistent service delivery can be guaranteed. + +## I.2 Federation for easy onboarding of application package + +When an application provider deploys an application package to an MEC system, many discussions on technical procedures and steps are required in addition to business negotiations with the MEC provider. It requires a lot of time and resources for the application provider and it would be a big burden if the application provider decided to interact with several other MEC providers. + +Federated MEC defines and provides standardized APIs to application providers, which can guarantee that technical steps for deployment are same, whether there is interaction with one MEC provider or several MEC providers. + +In addition, once an application package is successfully onboarded in one MEC provider, the MEC provider can directly deliver this package to other federated members with the acceptance of the application provider. It will be very valuable to enrich business opportunities of the application provider. For example, if an application provider with a local business wants to expand its MEC-based services globally, the local MEC provider can deliver an application package to a global MEC provider, which can be deployed globally without the application provider's global on-site technical support. + +## I.3 Federation for supporting consistent user experience across the MEC provider's coverage + +MEC aims to provide compute resources at the nearest place to the customer to improve the data transaction latency of contents or services to end users. As MEC systems are appropriate to provide a low latency and high-volume service within a limited range of areas, it would be difficult for MEC providers to facilitate their MEC systems in every location in a short period of time due to equipment installation costs. + +When users are located in the MEC service enabled area, their MEC service is handled through the operator's MEC node directly. However, when users move to another area where MEC service or systems are not yet enabled (e.g., roaming scenario), they cannot utilize the reliable low latency based services continually even if they hope to receive the same QoS wherever they are. + +In a case of federated MEC, federated MEC providers have already shared related information, such as edge computing resources, network capabilities and the locations of each MEC node, and have interfaces to communicate with each other. When one of the above-mentioned exception scenarios occurs, an MEC provider will be able to find which MEC providers are available and utilize their facilities to provide the same quality of service to users located in that area. + +For example, assuming that MEC provider A covers region I and MEC provider B covers regions I and II, and that they support the same capabilities for a mobile service and federate with each other. Mostly, a user of MEC provider A connects with MEC provider A in region I. However, when the user moves to region II, MEC provider A can interwork with MEC provider B to maintain the services that the user is currently using. + +## **I.4 Federation for connecting services deployed on a different MEC system** + +MEC systems are usually deployed along with mobile network operators, but only the mobile network operator does not have to be an MEC provider. There will be multiple MEC providers over the MEC infrastructure that network operator can physically provide. However, interaction between multiple MEC providers has not yet been considered, especially if MEC providers A and B are deployed on different MNO infrastructures. + +On the other hand, the commercial needs that connect with various services are increasing. For example, a voice recognition service can work as a key feature within other services, such as a navigation service. In that case, the voice recognition service provider is not necessarily the same as the navigation service provider, and each service can cooperate under commercial and technical agreements. When it is decided to deploy each service in an MEC system, a different MEC provider can be selected by each service. In these MEC environments, a service-level agreement will be maintained. + +Once the federation is performed, the federated members will share information about which application providers are deployed and will find the appropriate MEC system that the application provider wants to communicate with, even if each application is deployed on different MEC systems. Additionally, a communication path for an MEC-to-MEC system will be secured. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T X.1046] Recommendation ITU-T X.1046 (2020), *Framework of software-defined security in software-defined networks/network functions virtualization networks*. +- [b-ITU-T X.1047] Recommendation ITU-T X.1047 (2021), *Security requirements and architecture for network slice management and orchestration*. +- [b-ETSI GS MEC 001] ETSI GS MEC 001 (2019), *Multi-access edge computing (MEC) terminology*. +- [b-ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022] ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022 (2020), *Network functions virtualisation (NFV) release 2; Security; Access token specification for API access*. +- [b-GSMA] GSM Association (2021), *Operator Platform Telco Edge Requirements*, v1.0. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac295b1b0c7f14b1c5a33ef6682b1b017c812477 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:37aed4fc114a39843438175326e0b7e1d09a9d6075723d82fea32040fd560ee4 +size 7192 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/10781f43062bf3e9601a1e086710556c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/10781f43062bf3e9601a1e086710556c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be022f5a26a3dd6e81c967db92121cb3dc1b3b82 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/10781f43062bf3e9601a1e086710556c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:745741b93293bc31f70f8ffd3a327ddac991222a830ed37a80e495ec32939535 +size 36811 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/19a5f0db57a21a0e82a7f326083e96fd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/19a5f0db57a21a0e82a7f326083e96fd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f85e3cdf37cb992289c36e749ee40c842a19704c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/19a5f0db57a21a0e82a7f326083e96fd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a82cf91ef09df248957511736191a590c5e71e93c5c1f887b0383a44495bf749 +size 78122 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17a45f0a9217395c51100f62cdec722755e11d73 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bb16ca5862137c3876cff8c9d0df2bc9dc35ca15c18586a8bd7e29f9887e4b8 +size 91196 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/392a79ccd95e682ccd08f35ab2e64144_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/392a79ccd95e682ccd08f35ab2e64144_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa26954d56333aff23d12b28e223bb3a4d13818c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/392a79ccd95e682ccd08f35ab2e64144_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a36444ec6b3d10ded11d5b83b9801518b1d6dfa78207c96efc37301ef277b20f +size 76748 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/43837b056625d3d6ce615e4c02f163bb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/43837b056625d3d6ce615e4c02f163bb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b84b66c66435aa31023396204f0521dd7836db89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/43837b056625d3d6ce615e4c02f163bb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4a1f467b17bb414d6220313a88b27734158e2c5dabbacfe15723aacce419c3b6 +size 69289 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8759d1235a628d55653b21a8d9a57628936cf057 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:493641571281ff1951db082bdbc177b6a64461bdf5412b8a1dfea32f419f9f4c +size 86186 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/66e8a5ee8999de53e962b143d5cf86ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/66e8a5ee8999de53e962b143d5cf86ad_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72b5faaebd386d495da50667aeb6ed9e3aade72e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/66e8a5ee8999de53e962b143d5cf86ad_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a2242fbce3cd4b0fab6287bcd6989fcec02039a3c79f9b47dedc1f04c28f27d0 +size 17865 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/73dff6b45b2b9ffd384bab3235f869af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/73dff6b45b2b9ffd384bab3235f869af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1049b6c630cd55d97ee6391cf2647c68ad84d3db --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/73dff6b45b2b9ffd384bab3235f869af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3b1b35f66c0bfb65e0e306aa16523eb21dfbe138a0a2c7ccc51b517c89c2b4c1 +size 75662 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/759c7d62402f0b4651ddce292be5bdef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/759c7d62402f0b4651ddce292be5bdef_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9a947d975f96949bf6633c31d469d83b717fcb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/759c7d62402f0b4651ddce292be5bdef_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cb581f1d2dd58bfbeef7b14b597b169e977b8f218b158e38fc5ee6924402faf2 +size 100827 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/77464a47f104d0d647b2414591137b64_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/77464a47f104d0d647b2414591137b64_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90ac01425f12e416dff85f3df49f62e49b0ce802 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/77464a47f104d0d647b2414591137b64_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6ac3563ae391931479507175777d33d31a4421c0371417046506030a98f1ef83 +size 59806 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d77cf7a3bfbbadac10d90ca5fc05bf888ee29ea7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4c2e37f8d82de9df8667a1b04e27321b5d3b45c8cd117623a25d4601f0c341ed +size 56109 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f687094e6abe34a9cf491942b296d9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f687094e6abe34a9cf491942b296d9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ce0f381a30b98f230c22ae5533491a3931a8271 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/7f687094e6abe34a9cf491942b296d9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:14cf35d07dceabe7312dbd6c6eadf66582b60233e649d087ac76768104baa850 +size 84362 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/82b40cb8b2a5ac361973859400fa128a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/82b40cb8b2a5ac361973859400fa128a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d0d217edd9cf45bfa57f6b01984ecbc0ba8ad27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/82b40cb8b2a5ac361973859400fa128a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:613915f4a874b767b309900bc8f3af5f0698136d7938e1f4bf674406e488ece0 +size 56149 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db796427e12e86bf99fa3f90120d620449e5cdb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:120786feb73c623464df5480299d2379d977460b89d7712af882d7b5c02b51c6 +size 52902 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/8d325fc12b494e42c9ea7ed2a7f327a6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/8d325fc12b494e42c9ea7ed2a7f327a6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c74130d6fa8d0c44be2833989ec395df5998b9df --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/8d325fc12b494e42c9ea7ed2a7f327a6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ab73731c12b8b9751fbe77f8cec72b1cbd3038791a04bdecef39961d6fb7a2be +size 51700 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a3f81dedbdc5b702f397d07ef476d53e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a3f81dedbdc5b702f397d07ef476d53e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b6994edb787472d97c56bdfeafbf87426c2f9c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a3f81dedbdc5b702f397d07ef476d53e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c6ea69b511295ae6855f4dde7ae427365dd92f71fd94861a305fa851e2e842a6 +size 18609 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3b2fc9a12712a86ef6720f63c92764b1cf1bd0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5bf8bc384bedf8d31feb22f4cc78fc82904c4157334189338e9a4f9c98d44b23 +size 81876 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af93c92866722886931061f470e10dfff1055d59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:debe90235ceb3a50bffe3c92aeb4e71654b8b0ca7430f65b3a042af5b3028025 +size 114922 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4d13186e751571a233ba2f45ce1b536ce8ed775 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a2eda923c29110706fddf5da73a6ef59f6e4235a6ebf5ba2b6f51a4ab1905890 +size 161076 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..695fd1be99ae453b4d55b58b701b6ca1b8d435b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0764b45468fe031419edaae8903817ed2cae39477c881c7ea03a35f501607c36 +size 90471 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a561cbe2caa3b1d92ffa772c12f959197ee3fae0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:755f93ecb666ffc51fc4f04df9258e42ed39f3d0f479d5df2e6578961b2b1000 +size 62624 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/e5c6de7d8ff5b0d75d5602d200b899f0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/e5c6de7d8ff5b0d75d5602d200b899f0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f5aca7874dd7c4188ed4ac3b85a090a9c54787a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5007-202312-I_PDF-E/e5c6de7d8ff5b0d75d5602d200b899f0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b8ade2808cfc60432a8cbc985a0489ffdfe59a7de7e8ae4a7f867933d073eaa5 +size 17690 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38bdd7bc1d3581fbdc3cf6b035f618693dbe3846 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:75efa8e3513a799767c04a0bb7bcd87a550f2378f5880629068581808c1c9f7f +size 7353 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/1b5a812c8aa20fd5cba28e97001d32de_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/1b5a812c8aa20fd5cba28e97001d32de_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b824a0aaaec4ad9c8667a4094b84f173574e5f9c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/1b5a812c8aa20fd5cba28e97001d32de_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7a5ac627b9904c6d68a83d0756dd4236117504d09b79ef58afb1272206f8cd6e +size 74547 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19d6874ceaed3343ee309acfbce285231d66e1be --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c36b192f12d1d440cfcbbbd0d2d9fbc4d57a685f889ac8382f6eb7e9cd115109 +size 7890 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b715354e76c56f8cc3e39eb1f75a60b418dbda1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:415723a5586d6e2aab1cd6fa8854dfe6c37f194d7a38bf93cefc7845b20e53a9 +size 31731 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..689dd402bde6ad7cc781f9ca46a24f7da43d1b32 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:269becc8bd5d3119cd842f5c4057dc15e9f1eb55c9da46961c7c5b8e68b98ab5 +size 31775 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..499118cee122b63d5ecd5606afbb1720ec4fc417 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1346e5eefda65c4459929d3aa4e2fc9b4a8c06085409a83e7d9efb3979dcb913 +size 26821 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f54685f0aa6b8af1bd71fc679e23d1d051cb92f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b32dd92365eaf9c835c8c1918d2f00b1fafd4092e590075969a5cd8143e2874d +size 35984 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4cbfc9849de7b30710a4837a7634df3d9e32d01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d4010c0be24181cd9025a25fc7a87982efdc0d0f903d2f039eca4f057df779d4 +size 20153 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaec5c0b791eeed02dfc564e3bc67c1d537b5bd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b883f66dd89674da66f40f74c5a289c0d88624eae899fffb7e57b3bd6a0015b7 +size 14445 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36e2a8b7932af15a08625e1e3eb54c92257a6eaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ce09904cbb7f84efbe46e5d03a0c25fd1573de6bab544d6a3ec86a6abd27470a +size 91925 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/853f59c89931a666c07903b31d098277_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/853f59c89931a666c07903b31d098277_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a2ddca529abbf7dde7ba9e16e13effc8dfd9f79 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/853f59c89931a666c07903b31d098277_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8104592550c2cc5f749458365a7a95f686984bb716de7a6dfdf40cad6113b96a +size 37626 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23e3bc35016ba12c01c6dec081b1c3cfa4a58577 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c8fd956e01b03688318cdeeb31a15ff66fb1ef9778133f313a765d6d63868b03 +size 34096 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95fdc8181a8286537236ffc835d1cd9fbb17c7d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c8a26bf62322e4d4e4400dd6b26719058ab1a4c421b9cd0200adc3b9b392b5fb +size 47424 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14448c78621db5e35420a9e3ae33d5d29bd7ea57 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a8733121f81a7f6d89860dd0ee1fb4d86dc0a34b66feb4decc2eaaa401caea31 +size 100884 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..965c59b4076d24b1bf837094a7f426c7121ed070 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2ff010479c9f517216a99bed80b8185c5b285b90dea3b69df18abb22740bc568 +size 95293 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b8661c6c54f72ecc7ff6cb05e47b2891_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b8661c6c54f72ecc7ff6cb05e47b2891_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3aed6f389dabbef6d5203db056e50161fc4f642 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b8661c6c54f72ecc7ff6cb05e47b2891_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5b3607d41e4c29d269a2778bffe29bd7ec061a3b6223b65d201c95b32bc12997 +size 13957 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a36bde32b8b90c8d984fb1e6597994546a0e1279 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5e412d35f693e7af8ee9c07ab8c677edccea38b03c06914ab0575053eef7b726 +size 34034 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..903e726fcc27d848c0dd7b6f764b4d21982393b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:29d9156391f68ffbd5db1d8d1dade5338ab1956e3a9204f867b63064c620b6ac +size 91932 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52cdf9e5d84afa3519ed3338fabd4eda987bca7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e920f0e4b0a740551c7fcfa15e6198eadc62efebe83fed69d3b9e4e6b2f6d562 +size 30414 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4692cb85b813cef4b4148191a09afb139cdbd2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1124ada5e93f2d79ea88a7ed94f924c08302d0ac0d2acc4a039ab516b027e67c +size 102999 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d82cebbcad4617759264d286dec2703760dfd8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:359a938fc94aed78c0aea78664df085eba2cced4eb2c3c66ac80b98d26da144b +size 122240 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4837af00913e7c22d90775e08cff925dfc69d013 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c32b2ba6f3e0a4574167d94c466e8aea1abf169966b4da49eb22031d2c78ef72 +size 41991 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2aecf9cc510679208df9daa67d5e2909a465254 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:515e4c15655b2d952b935f913d17f9aa1cc31d30bb71abb8f11788af8ee99d44 +size 47336 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..201665f5fe048d87e83e78021cd90555e3368e1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5008-202312-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1514 @@ + + +# Recommendation **ITU-T Q.5008 (12/2023)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +Signalling requirements and protocols for IMT-2020 – +Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 + +--- + +### **Signalling requirements and architecture to support artificial intelligence-based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font superimposed on the globe. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS | Q.4160-Q.4179 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5019 | +| Protocols for IMT-2020 | Q.5020-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.5008 + +# Signalling requirements and architecture to support artificial intelligence-based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.5008 provides the signalling requirements and architecture to support artificial intelligence (AI) based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond. These requirements include the signalling information over each of the reference points and service procedures for a high-level AI platform. + +## History \* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.5008 | 2023-12-14 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/15730 | + +## Keywords + +AI, AI platform, MEC, vertical services. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2024 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +###### Page + +| | | | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 | Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 | Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 | +| 5 | Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 | Introduction..... | 2 | +| 7 | Signalling requirements and architecture ..... | 3 | +| 7.1 | Architectural model to support AI-based services ..... | 3 | +| 7.2 | High-level AI platform service procedures ..... | 6 | +| 8 | Signalling information for each of the reference points ..... | 9 | +| 8.1 | Signalling information for reference point As (Service layer – Core network layer)..... | 9 | +| 8.2 | Signalling information for reference point Ac (Core network layer – Edge access network layer) ..... | 12 | +| 8.3 | Signalling information for reference point Am (Edge access network layer – UE) ..... | 18 | +| 8.4 | Signalling information for reference point An (Core network layer – UE) ... | 20 | +| 9 | Security considerations ..... | 23 | +| | Appendix I – Use cases for AI service in vertical domains ..... | 24 | +| I.1 | Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Public security..... | 24 | +| I.2 | Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Media ..... | 25 | +| I.3 | Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Industry (manufacturing/logistics)..... | 27 | +| I.4 | Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Medical ..... | 28 | +| | Appendix II – AI base service implementation model ..... | 31 | +| II.1 | AI platform ..... | 31 | +| II.2 | Roles in the AI-based service implementation model ..... | 32 | +| II.3 | AI-based service implementation phases ..... | 33 | +| | Bibliography..... | 34 | + + + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.5008 + +# Signalling requirements and architecture to support artificial intelligence-based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation provides signalling requirements and architecture to support artificial intelligence (AI) based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond. It addresses the following subjects: + +- Signalling architecture and requirements for supporting AI-based vertical services; +- High-level AI platform service procedures; +- Signalling information for each of the reference points. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-T M.3080] Recommendation ITU-T M.3080 (2021), *Framework of artificial intelligence enhanced telecom operation and management (AITOM)*. + +[ITU-T Q.5003] Recommendation ITU-T Q.5003 (2022), *Signalling requirements and architecture for federated multiaccess edge computing*. + +[ITU-T Y.3172] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3172 (2019), *Architectural framework for machine learning in future networks including IMT-2020*. + +[ITU-T Y.3174] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3174 (2020), *Framework for data handling to enable machine learning in future networks including IMT-2020*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: + +**3.1.1 machine learning (ML)** [ITU-T Y.3172]: Processes that enable computational systems to understand data and gain knowledge from it without necessarily being explicitly programmed. + +NOTE 1 – Definition adapted from [b-ETSI GR ENI 004]. + +NOTE 2 – Supervised machine learning and unsupervised machine learning are two examples of machine learning types. + +**3.1.2 multi-access edge computing (MEC)** [b-ETSI GS MEC 001]: System which provides an IT service environment and cloud-computing capabilities at the edge of an access network which contains one or more type of access technology, and is in close proximity to its users. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.2.1 artificial intelligence (AI) application:** Application that can be instantiated on a user equipment (UE) within the AI system and can potentially provide or consume AI services. + +**3.2.2 artificial intelligence (AI) service:** Service provided via the AI platform. + +**3.2.3 artificial intelligence (AI) platform:** A full stack of technologies that enables AI service providers to support automated AI modelling and services for the AI-based applications. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|-------|---------------------------------------------| +| AI | Artificial Intelligence | +| API | Application Programming Interface | +| DBMS | Database Management System | +| FE | Functional Entity | +| MEC | Multi-access Edge Computing | +| ML | Machine Learning | +| NPU | Neural Processing Unit | +| OAuth | Open Authorization | +| PACS | Picture Archiving and Communication Systems | +| UE | User Equipment | +| URI | Uniform Resource Identifier | +| URL | Uniform Resource Locator | + +# 5 Conventions + +None + +# 6 Introduction + +An increasing number of companies are adapting artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to their business model. Appendix I introduces a number of AI service use cases in vertical domains. These AI services utilize AI models to analyse datasets, find patterns and make predictions without the need for human inference. As described in Appendix II, the development and implementation of AI services involves data collection and processing, AI modelling, training, and inferencing. Most AI modelling and training is carried out using machine learning (ML) [ITU-T Y.3172], [ITU-T Y.3174] and [b-ISO/IEC 22989]. + +The development and implementation of AI services requires huge amounts of high-performance AI dedicated cloud resources and expertise. However, for individual AI-based service providers and even for small and medium-sized businesses (enterprises), operating in such a required environment by themselves often becomes onerous. IMT-2020 network operators run large scale cloud computing facilities in their networks including edge cloud or multi-access edge computing (MEC). + +AI platform which supports automated AI modelling and services, built in the network operator's cloud facilities, can provide the required resources and services for AI-based service providers to develop and deploy necessary AI models and applications. However, as AI services are very diverse + +and components for an AI service are distributed over the network, it is necessary to have a standardized signalling architecture that efficiently interlinks them to fulfil the purpose of each service. + +In addition to the signalling architecture to provide required resources and services for AI-based service providers, this Recommendation defines a layered architectural model with reference points, and specifies the signalling flows and message information. For each layer, functional entities (FEs) and requirements are also defined. The signalling flows and message information are specified in accordance with the high-level AI platform service procedures to support AI-based services. + +# **7 Signalling requirements and architecture** + +The architectural model for AI services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond is required to support the following functionalities to: + +- analyse and process the data for the user equipment (UE) if the UE has the AI infrastructure function; +- analyse the data in the edge access network layer for the MEC [b-ETSI GS MEC 001] and [ITU-T Q.5003] environment or the core network layer for non-MEC environment and then provide the specific AI service by building the AI model; +- provide the specific AI service, in the edge access network layer or in the core network layer, by building the AI model with analysis using the data from the UE. + +The raw data and processed data from the UE and from each of the predefined network layers, such as the core network layer and the edge access network layer, may be used independently or together for AI services. + +## **7.1 Architectural model to support AI-based services** + +Figure 7-1 depicts an architectural model to support AI-based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond. As shown in the figure, the architectural model consists of four functional layers, the service layer, the core network layer, the edge access network layer and the UE. + +![Architectural model to support AI-based services diagram](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architectural model for AI-based services, organized into four layers separated by reference points: + +- Service layer (top):** Contains "AI services and applications" and "APIs for AI applications". +- As reference point:** The interface between the Service layer and the Core network layer. +- Core network layer:** Contains the "AI platform service manager function", "AI infrastructure function (Processor units)", "AI modelling support function", and "AI data repository function". +- Ac reference point:** The interface between the Core network layer and the Edge access network layer. +- Edge access network layer:** Contains "AI infrastructure function (Processor units)", "AI data local repository function", and "AI modelling support function". +- An reference point:** A vertical reference point on the right side between the Core network layer and the UE. +- Am reference point:** The interface between the Edge access network layer and the UE environment. +- UE environment (bottom):** Divided into "MEC environment" (containing "AI infrastructure function") and "Non-MEC environment" (containing "UE"). + +Q.5008(23) + +Architectural model to support AI-based services diagram + +**Figure 7-1 – Architectural model to support AI-based services** + +#### 7.1.1 Functional entities and requirements + +##### 7.1.1.1 Service layer + +The service layer is required to be responsible for providing AI platform services to various service providers by using application programming interfaces (APIs) for AI applications. In this way various service providers, such as security, media, medical and manufacturing service providers, etc., can utilize the AI services provided by the AI platform. + +![Functional entities for the service layer diagram](b8661c6c54f72ecc7ff6cb05e47b2891_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows the functional entities for the service layer, consisting of a grey box containing "AI services and applications" and "APIs for AI applications", with the label "Service layer" to the right. + +Q.5008(23) + +Functional entities for the service layer diagram + +**Figure 7-2 – Functional entities for the service layer** + +##### 7.1.1.2 Core network layer + +The core network layer is required to provide functionalities which are necessary to process AI platform services such as AI data processing, modelling, and data repository services which may require the most complex AI processing costs and high performance levels. The functional entities (FEs) in the core network layer, shown in Figure 7-3, are required to perform functionalities as follows: + +![Figure 7-3: Functional entities for the core network layer. The diagram shows a hierarchical structure. At the top is a box labeled 'AI platform service manager function'. Below it are two side-by-side boxes: 'AI infrastructure function (Processor units)' on the left and 'AI modelling support function' on the right. Below these two boxes is a single box labeled 'AI data repository function'. All three boxes are contained within a larger light green box labeled 'Core network layer' at the bottom right.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-3: Functional entities for the core network layer. The diagram shows a hierarchical structure. At the top is a box labeled 'AI platform service manager function'. Below it are two side-by-side boxes: 'AI infrastructure function (Processor units)' on the left and 'AI modelling support function' on the right. Below these two boxes is a single box labeled 'AI data repository function'. All three boxes are contained within a larger light green box labeled 'Core network layer' at the bottom right. + +Q.5008(23) + +**Figure 7-3 – Functional entities for the core network layer** + +- AI platform service manager functional entity (FE) is a centralized focal point which interacts with the service layer through the As reference point. The FE generally manages and maintains up to date information on all the APIs, AI models, and labelled raw/processed public data, as well as information on the AI platform resources such as availability, performance and utilization, etc. It may also manage the information on the subscriptions to the APIs and resources. The FE posts or deletes the information and APIs for AI models and other AI platform services on behalf of individual AI platform FEs in the core network layer and edge access network layer. The FE also handles resource allocation requests for the AI platform infrastructure and data repository; +- AI infrastructure FE processes raw data or various training data, using AI processor units; +- AI modelling support FE generates AI model to be suitable for the AI-based application services that the application service providers want to provide, based on the analysed data; +- AI data repository FE stores raw data, training data, testing data, or meta data that are generated during the AI process pipeline (e.g., data collection – analysing – modelling – service). + +##### 7.1.1.3 Edge access network layer + +The edge access network layer is required to provide functionalities which are necessary for the AI service processing tasks such as AI data processing, modelling, and data repository services which may require mid-level complexity and performance, meaning that it could perform the AI pipelines similar to that of the core network but with less resources. + +![Figure 7-4: Functional entities for the edge access network layer. The diagram shows a vertical stack of three boxes. The top box is 'AI infrastructure function (Processor units)'. The middle box is 'AI data local repository function'. The bottom box is 'AI modelling support function'. These three boxes are contained within a larger light blue box labeled 'Edge access network layer' at the bottom.](5e92d9e8e9ce204e405bff2367f88176_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-4: Functional entities for the edge access network layer. The diagram shows a vertical stack of three boxes. The top box is 'AI infrastructure function (Processor units)'. The middle box is 'AI data local repository function'. The bottom box is 'AI modelling support function'. These three boxes are contained within a larger light blue box labeled 'Edge access network layer' at the bottom. + +Q.5008(23) + +**Figure 7-4 – Functional entities for the edge access network layer** + +In order to build the AI pipelines, the functional entities in the edge access network layer shown in Figure 7-4, are required to perform functionalities as follows: + +- AI infrastructure FE processes raw data or various training data, using AI processor units; +- AI modelling support FE generates the AI model suitable for the AI services that the service providers want to provide, based on analysed data; +- AI data repository FE stores raw data, training data, testing data, or meta data that are generated during the AI process pipeline (e.g., data collection – analysing – modelling – service). + +However, due to the relatively lower computational power and capacity compared to those of the core network layer, AI services generated from the edge access network layer should be much simpler than those from the core network layer. + +##### 7.1.1.4 User equipment (UE) + +UE, such as smartphones and edge AI cameras, provide the most simple and low-level AI services by themselves, such as simple inferencing. Thereby, it consists only of AI infrastructure FEs with embedded AI functions such as object detection. However, by interworking with AI platform FEs in the edge access network layer or in the core network layer, UE can also provide more complex AI services to users. + +![Figure 7-5: Functional entities for the UE. A diagram showing a rounded rectangle labeled 'UE' containing a box labeled 'AI infrastructure function'. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5008(23)'.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +Q.5008(23) + +Figure 7-5: Functional entities for the UE. A diagram showing a rounded rectangle labeled 'UE' containing a box labeled 'AI infrastructure function'. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5008(23)'. + +Figure 7-5 – Functional entities for the UE + +## 7.2 High-level AI platform service procedures + +#### 7.2.1 Procedures to post/delete APIs + +![Figure 7-6: AI platform service procedures to post/delete APIs. A sequence diagram showing interactions between an AI platform, an AI platform service manager FE, and a Service layer. The steps are: 0. Generate/delete AI models/services (dashed box), 1. Request post/delete APIs, 2. Manage overall APIs and information, 3. Post/delete APIs, 4. Response post/delete APIs. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5008(23)'.](853f59c89931a666c07903b31d098277_img.jpg) + +Q.5008(23) + +Figure 7-6: AI platform service procedures to post/delete APIs. A sequence diagram showing interactions between an AI platform, an AI platform service manager FE, and a Service layer. The steps are: 0. Generate/delete AI models/services (dashed box), 1. Request post/delete APIs, 2. Manage overall APIs and information, 3. Post/delete APIs, 4. Response post/delete APIs. Below the diagram is the text 'Q.5008(23)'. + +Figure 7-6 – AI platform service procedures to post/delete APIs + +Figure 7-6 shows AI platform service procedures to post/delete APIs. + +0. AI platforms in the edge access network layer (i.e., MEC environment) or in the core network layer (i.e., non-MEC environment) generate or delete AI models, AI platform services, and raw/processed labelled public data for the training practices. + +1. The AI platform requests post/delete APIs with related information such as API name, API ID, API version, URI/URL (e.g., URL for web APIs), required parameters, and API descriptions, etc. Updating an API may be accomplished by deleting an API and posting a new one with the same API ID but with a new version. + +- APIs for AI models may include, for example, APIs to download AI models and to use the AI models for the AI applications to analyse or to inference from input data, etc. +- APIs for AI platform services may also include, for example, APIs to request AI platform resources and to use the allocated resources. + +- For the raw/processed labelled public data, users may download them to their facilities, or place them in the AI data repository FE and practice training using AI Infrastructure and AI modelling support FE tools. +- 2. Centralized AI platform service manager FE in the core network layer manages overall APIs and related information. +- 3. The AI platform service manager FE posts/deletes APIs towards the service layer according to the requests from the AI platforms. +- 4. The AI platform service manager FE responses to the requested AI platform with the result. + +#### 7.2.2 Procedures to request AI platform resources + +![Sequence diagram illustrating the procedures to request AI platform resources. The diagram shows three main entities: UE, AI platform service manager FE, and AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE. The sequence of messages is: 1. UE sends 'Request resource allocation' to AI platform service manager FE; 2. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Selects proper AI platform FE' to itself; 3. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Request resource provisioning' to AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE; 4. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Make provision for the requested resource' to itself; 5. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Response resource provisioning' to AI platform service manager FE; 6. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Response allocated resource' to UE. The diagram is labeled Q.5008(23).](eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant UE + participant APSM as AI platform service manager FE + participant APIF as AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE + Note right of APSM: 2. Selects proper AI platform FE + Note right of APIF: 4. Make provision for the requested resource + UE->>APSM: 1. Request resource allocation + APSM->>APSM: 2. Selects proper AI platform FE + APSM->>APIF: 3. Request resource provisioning + APIF->>APIF: 4. Make provision for the requested resource + APIF->>APSM: 5. Response resource provisioning + APSM->>UE: 6. Response allocated resource + +``` + +Sequence diagram illustrating the procedures to request AI platform resources. The diagram shows three main entities: UE, AI platform service manager FE, and AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE. The sequence of messages is: 1. UE sends 'Request resource allocation' to AI platform service manager FE; 2. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Selects proper AI platform FE' to itself; 3. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Request resource provisioning' to AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE; 4. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Make provision for the requested resource' to itself; 5. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Response resource provisioning' to AI platform service manager FE; 6. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Response allocated resource' to UE. The diagram is labeled Q.5008(23). + +**Figure 7-7 – Procedures to request AI platform resources** + +Figure 7-7 shows procedures to request AI platform resources. + +1. Using posted APIs, the UE requests AI platform resources allocation such as AI processor units and data repository storage capacity, etc. The request message may include resources type, amount of capacity and technical specifications such as performance, throughput, latency and resiliency, etc. The API calls directly to the AI platform service manager FE as the API target endpoint. +2. Upon receiving the resources allocation request API call, the AI platform service manager FE selects a proper AI platform FE which fulfils the request in terms of availability, utilization and performance, etc. +3. Then the AI platform service manager FE sends a resources provisioning request to the selected AI platform FE. The request message contains required resources information specified by the resource allocation request from the UE. +4. According to the resource provisioning request, the selected FE secures required resources. +5. Then the selected FE responds to the AI platform service manager FE with the information on the provisioned resources such as resource ID, APIs which contain the uniform resource identifiers (URIs) to access the resource, and allocated resource capacity, etc. +6. The AI platform service manager FE responds to the requested UE with the allocated resource information received from the selected FE. + +### 7.2.3 Procedures to release AI platform resources + +![Sequence diagram for releasing AI platform resources. Lifelines: UE, AI platform service manager FE, and AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE. The sequence is: 1. UE sends 'Request resource release' to AI platform service manager FE; 2. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Resource release request' to AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE; 3. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Release the allocated resource'; 4. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Resource release response' to AI platform service manager FE; 5. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Response resource release' to UE. Reference Q.5008(23) is at the bottom right.](b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for releasing AI platform resources. Lifelines: UE, AI platform service manager FE, and AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE. The sequence is: 1. UE sends 'Request resource release' to AI platform service manager FE; 2. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Resource release request' to AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE; 3. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Release the allocated resource'; 4. AI platform infrastructure FE or data repository FE sends 'Resource release response' to AI platform service manager FE; 5. AI platform service manager FE sends 'Response resource release' to UE. Reference Q.5008(23) is at the bottom right. + +Figure 7-8 – Procedures to release AI platform resources + +Figure 7-8 shows procedures to release AI platform resources. + +1. Using posted APIs, UE requests allocated AI platform resources such as AI processor units and data repository storage capacity, etc. The request message may include the AI platform ID which provisioned the resource, resource type, allocated resource ID and UE application ID, etc. The API call directs to the AI platform service manager FE as the API target endpoint. +2. Upon receiving the resource release request API call, the AI platform service manager FE sends a resource release request to the target AI platform FE. +3. The target AI platform FE, e.g., AI infrastructure or data repository according to the resource type specified in the release request, releases the allocated resource as requested. +4. Then the target AI platform FE responds to the AI platform service manager FE with the resource release result. +5. The AI platform service manager FE responds to the requested UE with resource release result received from the FE which released the allocated resource as requested. + +### 7.2.4 Procedures to respond API calls + +![Sequence diagram for AI platform service procedures to respond API calls. Lifelines: UE, AI platform @ edge access network layer, and AI platform @ core network layer. The diagram is split into two environment cases. In the Non-MEC environment case: 1. UE sends 'API call' to AI platform @ core network layer; 2. AI platform @ core network layer executes the API call; 3. AI platform @ core network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE. In the MEC environment case: 1a. UE sends 'API call' to AI platform @ edge access network layer; 1b. AI platform @ edge access network layer redirects the API call to AI platform @ core network layer; 2a. AI platform @ edge access network layer executes the API call; 2b. AI platform @ core network layer executes the API call; 3a. AI platform @ edge access network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE; 3b. AI platform @ core network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE. Reference Q.5008(23) is at the bottom right.](1b5a812c8aa20fd5cba28e97001d32de_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for AI platform service procedures to respond API calls. Lifelines: UE, AI platform @ edge access network layer, and AI platform @ core network layer. The diagram is split into two environment cases. In the Non-MEC environment case: 1. UE sends 'API call' to AI platform @ core network layer; 2. AI platform @ core network layer executes the API call; 3. AI platform @ core network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE. In the MEC environment case: 1a. UE sends 'API call' to AI platform @ edge access network layer; 1b. AI platform @ edge access network layer redirects the API call to AI platform @ core network layer; 2a. AI platform @ edge access network layer executes the API call; 2b. AI platform @ core network layer executes the API call; 3a. AI platform @ edge access network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE; 3b. AI platform @ core network layer sends 'Response to the API call' to UE. Reference Q.5008(23) is at the bottom right. + +Figure 7-9 – AI platform service procedures to respond API calls + +Figure 7-9 shows AI platform service procedures to respond API calls. + +For UEs attached to the network access point which does not support the MEC environment: + +1. UE triggers an API call with the required parameters. For example, when an AI application on the UE triggers the API call to analyse the input data using a trained AI model, the API call may include the AI application ID and input data (or URI/URL to it), etc. As the API endpoint URI/URL contained in the call can be served at the core network layer AI platform, the API call is directed to it. +2. The AI platform executes the requested API call. +3. The AI platform sends a response to the requested UE. For the above example in step 1, the response message may include analysed result, output data if any, and the requested AI application ID, etc. + +For UEs attached to the network access point which supports the MEC environment: + +- 1a. UE triggers an API call with required parameters. If the API endpoint URI/URL contained in the call can be served at the local AI platform on the attached edge access network layer MEC, the API call is directed to the AI platform. The example API call parameters given in step 1 of the above non-MEC environment case, also applies to this case. +- 1b. If the local MEC AI platform cannot serve the API call, the AI platform redirects the API call to the AI platform at the core network layer AI platform. This is the case when the API call execution requires higher capability than that of the local MEC AI platform in terms of complexity, AI processing performance and AI data repository capacity, etc. +- 2a. The local MEC AI platform executes the requested API call. +- 2b. The AI platform at the core network layer executes the requested API call. +- 3a. The local MEC AI platform sends a response to the requested UE. The information components of the response message given in step 3 of the above non-MEC environment case, also applies to this case. +- 3b. The AI platform at the core network layer sends a response to the requested UE. The information components of the response message given in step 3 of the above non-MEC environment case, also applies to this case. + +# 8 Signalling information for each of the reference points + +For interworking between the service layer, core network layer, edge access network layer, and UE, the following reference points for signalling and message exchange between layers should be defined: + +- *As* reference point between the service layer and core network layer; +- *Ac* reference point between core network layer and edge access network layer; +- *Am* reference point between edge access network layer and UE in the MEC environment; +- *An* reference point between the core network layer and UE in the non-MEC environment. + +## 8.1 Signalling information for reference point *As* (Service layer – Core network layer) + +In order to provide AI services and applications to users, the *As* reference point is required to exchange request/response messages between the AI services and the core network layer: + +- To authorize the use of AI platform services and resources, the *As* reference point is required to allow request/response message exchange for the authentication code and the access tokens; + +- As reference point is required to exchange AI infrastructure resource information regarding AI processor units, AI model and API information that performs services, and information on raw data and processed data; +- In addition, to maintain the best service quality, functions such as updating APIs and API model information, or deleting unnecessary APIs and AI models should be provided. + +![Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point As between AI services and applications and the Core network layer. The diagram shows six messages exchanged: AS authentication code request, AS authentication code response, AS access token request, AS access token response, AS AI resource info request, and AS AI resource info response. The diagram is labeled Q.5008(23).](5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant AI as AI services and applications + participant CNL as Core network layer + Note right of CNL: Q.5008(23) + AI->>CNL: AS authentication code request + CNL-->>AI: AS authentication code response + AI->>CNL: AS access token request + CNL-->>AI: AS access token response + AI->>CNL: AS AI resource info request + CNL-->>AI: AS AI resource info response + +``` + +Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point As between AI services and applications and the Core network layer. The diagram shows six messages exchanged: AS authentication code request, AS authentication code response, AS access token request, AS access token response, AS AI resource info request, and AS AI resource info response. The diagram is labeled Q.5008(23). + +**Figure 8-1 – Signalling flows for reference point As** + +### 8.1.1 AS authentication code request and response messages + +The AS authentication code message is defined as AS-AUTHENTICATION-CODE message. This message is sent by the AI application to the core network layer for requesting the AS authentication (\*CRUD1) code. + +#### 8.1.1.1 AS authentication code request message + +The AS authentication code request information flow is sent by AI applications to the core network layer to obtain the authentication code. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + +< AS-AUTHENTICATION-CODE-REQUEST-Message > ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } +{ AS-Name } +{ AS-Description } +{ AS-Argument-Info } +{ Service-Name, Access-Right (CRUD) } + +``` + +#### 8.1.1.2 AS authentication code response message + +The AS authentication code response information flow is sent by the core network layer to AI applications to provide the authentication code. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + +< AS-AUTHENTICATION-CODE-RESPONSE-Message > ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } + +``` + +1 C: Create / R: Read / U: Update / D: Delete + +``` + +{ AS-Name } + { AS-Description} + { AS-Argument-Info } + {Service-Name, Access-Right (CRUD) } + { AS-Result } + {AS-Authentication-Code } + +``` + +### 8.1.2 AS access token request and response messages + +The AS access token message is defined as AS-ACCESS-TOKEN message. This message is sent by the AI application to the core network layer for requesting the AS access token. + +#### 8.1.2.1 AS access token request message + +The AS access token request information flow is sent by AI applications to the core network layer to obtain the AS access token. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + +< AS-ACCESS-TOKEN-REQUEST-Message > ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } +{ AS-Name } + { AS-Description} + { AS-Argument-Info } + {AS-Authentication-Code } + +``` + +#### 8.1.2.2 AS access token response message + +The AS access token response information flow is sent by the core network layer to AI applications to provide the AS access token. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + +< AS-ACCESS-TOKEN-RESPONSE-Message > ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } +{ AS-Name } + { AS-Description} + { AS-Argument-Info } + {AS-Authentication-Code } + { AS-Result } + {AS-Access-Token} + +``` + +### 8.1.3 AS AI resource info request and response messages + +The AS AI resource info message is defined as AS-AI-RESOURCE-INFO message. The AS-AI-RESOURCE-INFO message is sent by an AI application to the core network layer to request the AI resource information such as AI processor units, AI model and API information that performs services, and information on raw data and processed data provided by the core network layer. The core network layer then responds to the application through the response message with the requested AI resource information. + +##### 8.1.3.1 AS AI resource info request message + +The AS AI resource info request message is sent by AI applications to the core network layer to obtain the AI resource information. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } +{ AS-Name } +{ AS-Description } +{ AS-Argument-Info } +{ Processor-Unit?AI-model?API-Info }, +{AS-Access-Token } +``` + +##### 8.1.3.2 AS AI resource info response message + +The AS AI resource info response message is sent by the core network layer to AI applications to provide the requested AI platform resource information. It contains the following information components: + +Message format: + +``` + ::= < Message Header > +{ Application-ID } +{ Service-Session-ID } +{ AS-ID } +{ AS-Name } +{ AS-Description } +{ AS-Argument-Info } +{ Processor-Unit?AI-model?API-Info }, +{AS-Access-Token } +{ AS-Result } +{AS-ID#1, AS-Name, Processor-Unit, AI-model-Type, API-Info (CRUD)}, +{AS-ID#N, AS-Name, Processor-Unit, AI-model-Type, API-Info (CRUD)} +``` + +## 8.2 Signalling information for reference point Ac (Core network layer – Edge access network layer) + +The Ac reference point should allow the core network layer to cooperate with different sub-network AI platform FEs in the edge access network layer MECs, and to check the availability of each sub-network AI platform FEs and resources. + +- Ac reference point is required to exchange AI infrastructure resource information regarding processor units, etc., AI model information, and information on raw data and processed data. +- Also, up to date information on the supported APIs from each edge access network layer should be exchanged through the Ac reference point, thereby the AI platform service manager FE in the core network layer can manage and maintain the latest status of all the AI platform service availabilities, providing optimal service configuration in the core network layer. Figure 8 2 shows signalling flows for reference point Ac. + +![Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point Ac between the Edge access network layer and the Core network layer. The diagram illustrates several request-response message exchanges: AC post API request/response, AC delete API request/response, AC resource provision request/response, AC resource release request/response, and an AC redirect API call.](9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Edge as Edge access network layer + participant Core as Core network layer + Note right of Core: Q.5008(23) + + Edge->>Core: AC post API request + Core-->>Edge: AC post API response + Edge->>Core: AC delete API request + Core-->>Edge: AC delete API response + Edge->>Core: AC resource provision request + Core-->>Edge: AC resource provision response + Edge->>Core: AC resource release request + Core-->>Edge: AC resource release response + Edge->>Core: AC redirect API call + +``` + +Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point Ac between the Edge access network layer and the Core network layer. The diagram illustrates several request-response message exchanges: AC post API request/response, AC delete API request/response, AC resource provision request/response, AC resource release request/response, and an AC redirect API call. + +**Figure 8-2 – Signalling flows for reference point Ac** + +### 8.2.1 AC post API request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.1 and shown in Figure 7-6, AI platforms in the edge access network layer may exchange the request/response messages to post APIs with the core network layer. + +#### 8.2.1.1 AC post API request message + +AI platforms at the edge access network layer need to post APIs which allows access to their AI infrastructure, data repository, AI models, AI modelling support function and labelled raw/processed public data. Posting and deleting the APIs on the service layer is the AI platform service manager's role at the core network layer as defined in clause 7.1.1.2. To post the APIs, each corresponding FE in the edge network layer AI platform sends a post API request message to the AI platform service manager through reference point Ac. + +The message can be used to update the posted APIs. To update the posted API, the FE which posted the API deletes the API, then posts a new one with updated API information including new API version. The message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the requesting AI platform +- Information on the API ID, API version, API name, etc. +- API type which classifies the targeted AI Platform resource and service types + - API to access/use AI Infrastructure; or + - API to access/use local data repository; or + - API to access/use labelled raw/processed public data; or + - API to access/use AI models; or + - API to access/use AI modelling support functions +- API descriptor which specifies the information required to access/use AI platform services including: + - Resource URI/URL + - Protocol/HTTP method + - Pre-conditions + - OAuth + - Data format + - Parameters (e.g., Required/Optional, Query string parameters, Response parameter, etc.) + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {API-ID} + {API-Version} + {API-Name} + {API-Type} + {API-Descriptor} +``` + +#### 8.2.1.2 AC post API response message + +The AI platform service manager at the core network layer posts the requested API on the service layer through the *As* reference point, then responds to the post API request message. In this way, the function generally manages and maintains up to date information on all the APIs for AI infrastructure resources, AI models, AI modelling support functions and labelled raw/processed public data from AI platforms. The post API response message may include the following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the requested AI platform +- Information on API ID, API version, API name, etc. +- API type which classifies the targeted AI Platform resource and service types, such as + - API to access/use AI infrastructure; or + - API to access/use local data repository; or + - API to access/use labelled raw/processed public data; or + - API to access/use AI models; or + - API to access/use AI modelling support functions +- Post API result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {API-ID} + {API-Version} + {API-Name} + {API-Type} + {Post-API-Result} +``` + +### 8.2.2 AC delete API request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.1 and shown in Figure 7-6, AI platforms in the edge access network layer may exchange the request/response messages to delete APIs with the core network layer. + +#### 8.2.2.1 AC delete API request message + +For the posted APIs, each corresponding FE in the edge network layer AI platform can delete APIs which are not available anymore or that need to be updated. For this, the FE sends a delete API request message to the AI platform service manager at the core network layer through reference point *Ac*. The delete API request message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the requesting AI platform +- Information on API ID, API version, API name, etc. +- API type which classifies the targeted AI platform resource and service types, such as + +- API to access/use AI infrastructure; or +- API to access/use local data repository; or +- API to access/use labelled raw/processed public data; or +- API to access/use AI models; or +- API to access/use AI modelling support functions +- Reason to delete the API + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {API-ID} + {API-Version} + {API-Name} + {API-Type} + {Reason} +``` + +##### 8.2.2.2 AC delete API response message + +The AI platform service manager at the core network layer deletes the API on the service layer through As reference point as requested, then responds to the delete API request message. In this way, the function generally manages and maintains up to date information on all the APIs for AI infrastructure resources, AI models, AI modelling support functions and labelled raw/processed public data from AI platforms. The delete API response message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the requested AI platform +- Information on API ID, API version, API name, etc. +- API type which classifies the targeted AI Platform resource and service types, such as + - API to access/use AI infrastructure; or + - API to access/use local data repository; or + - API to access/use labelled raw/processed public data; or + - API to access/use AI models; or + - API to access/use AI modelling support functions +- Delete API result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {API-ID} + {API-Version} + {API-Name} + {API-Type} + {Delete-API-Result} +``` + +### 8.2.3 AC resource provision request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.2 and shown in Figure 7-7, AI platforms in the edge access network layer may exchange the resource provision request/response messages with the core network layer. + +#### 8.2.3.1 AC resource provision request message + +For the resource allocation request from an UE, the AI platform service manager sends a resource provision request message to a selected AI platform. The message may include the following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the target AI platform +- Information on the UE which requests the resource allocation, such as: + - UE identifier + - UE context information + - UE authentication code + - API ID, API version, API name, API type which are used to request the resource allocation + - Access token +- Resource allocation request message information, such as: + - UE application ID which requests the resource allocation + - Requested resource type + - Amount of required capacity and technical specifications such as performance, throughput, latency and resiliency, etc. + - CRUD information + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {UE-Info} + {Resource-Allocation-Request-Info} +``` + +##### 8.2.3.2 AC resource provision response message + +For the resource provision request from the AI platform service manager, an AI platform FE corresponding to the requested resource type, such as AI infrastructure, AI data repository, etc. in the edge access network layer, sends a resource provision response message to the AI platform service manager with the information on the provisioned resources. The message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the AI platform which provisioned the requested resource +- Information on the UE which requests the resource allocation, such as: + - UE identifier + - UE context information + - UE authentication code + - API ID, API version, API name, API type which are used to request the resource allocation + - Access token +- Provisioned resource information, such as: + - UE application ID which requests the resource allocation + - Resource type + - Resource ID + - APIs each of which contains the URI/URL to access and utilize the resource + +- Resource descriptor which contains the amount of provisioned capacity and technical specifications such as performance, throughput, latency and resiliency, etc. +- CRUD information +- Constraint information +- Resource provision result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {UE-Info} + {Provisioned-Resource-Info} + {Resource-Provision-Result} +``` + +### 8.2.4 AC resource release request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.3 and shown in Figure 7-8, AI platforms in the edge access network layer may exchange the resource release request/response messages with the core network layer. + +#### 8.2.4.1 AC resource release request message + +For the resource release request from UE, the AI platform service manager sends a resource release request message to the AI platform which allocated the corresponding resource. The message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID to identify the target AI platform +- Information on the UE which requests the resource release, such as: + - UE identifier + - UE context information + - UE authentication code + - API ID, API version, API name, API type which are used to request the resource release + - Access token +- Resource release request message information, such as: + - UE application ID which requests the resource release + - Allocated resource type to release + - Allocated resource ID to release + - Reason to release + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {UE-Info} + {Resource-Release-Request-Info} +``` + +#### 8.2.4.2 AC resource release response message + +For the resource release request from the AI platform service manager, an AI platform FE corresponding to the requested resource release, such as AI infrastructure, AI data repository, etc. in the edge access network layer, sends a resource release response message to the AI platform service manager with the result of the requested resource release. The message may include following information: + +- AI platform ID which released the resource + +- Information on the UE which requests the resource release, such as: + - UE identifier + - UE context information + - UE authentication code + - API ID, API version, API name, API type which are used to request the resource release + - Access token +- Released resource information, such as: + - UE application ID which requests the resource release + - Released resource type + - Released resource ID +- Resource release result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {UE-Info} + {Released-Resource-Info} + {Resource-Release-Result} +``` + +### 8.2.5 AC redirect API call message + +If an AI platform in the edge access network layer cannot serve a received API call, the AI platform redirects it to the AI platform at the core network layer using a redirect API call message, as specified in clause 7.2.4 and shown in Figure 7-9. The message may include information such as: + +- AI platform ID which redirects the API call +- Information on the UE which invokes the API call, such as: + - UE identifier + - UE context information + - UE authentication code + - Called API ID, API version, API name, API type + - Access token +- Encapsulated API call + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {UE-Info} + {Encapsulated-API-Call} +``` + +## 8.3 Signalling information for reference point *Am* (Edge access network layer – UE) + +The *Am* reference point between UE and the edge access network layer allows UE to invoke diverse API calls of which URI/URL direct to the API resource at the edge access network Layer AI platform. By invoking the API calls, AI applications running on the UE utilize the support of the necessary AI platform service. Figure 8-3 shows signalling flows for reference point *Am*. + +![Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point Am. A User Equipment (UE) box on the left sends a dashed arrow labeled 'AM API call' to an 'Edge access network layer' box on the right. A return dashed arrow labeled 'AM API call response' goes from the edge access network layer back to the UE. Below the edge access network layer box is the text 'Q.5008(23)'.](7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing signalling flows for reference point Am. A User Equipment (UE) box on the left sends a dashed arrow labeled 'AM API call' to an 'Edge access network layer' box on the right. A return dashed arrow labeled 'AM API call response' goes from the edge access network layer back to the UE. Below the edge access network layer box is the text 'Q.5008(23)'. + +**Figure 8-3 – Signalling flows for reference point Am** + +### 8.3.1 AM API call and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.4 and shown in Figure 7-9 for the MEC environment case, AI applications running on the UE invoke API calls to utilize the support of necessary AI platform services in the edge access network layer. In order to request/response the services, UE and AI platform in the edge access network layer exchange the API call invoke/response messages. + +#### 8.3.1.1 AM API call message + +UE invokes API calls to analyse and process data, and to access and use resources including trained AI models and other AI services which are provided by AI platforms in the edge access layer. Each API call is made with the required parameters as specified in the posted API description. Although the required parameters may differ according to API, the API call message may include the following basic information: + +- UE application ID which invokes the API call +- Access token +- URI/URL to the API resource +- Input data information (e.g., URI/URL to upload payload, etc.) +- Required parameters for the API call + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {Application-ID} + {Access-Token} + {API-URI/URL} + {Input-Data-Info} + {Request-Parameters} +``` + +#### 8.3.1.2 AM API call response message + +AI platforms respond to the invoked API calls with API call response messages. Response parameters for each API are made up in accordance with the response parameters as specified in the posted API description. Although the response parameters may differ depending on the API, the API call response message may include basic information such as: + +- UE application ID which invoked the API call +- Access token +- Uploaded input data ID +- Job ID of the API execution +- Output data information (e.g., URI/URL to output/meta data, etc.) +- Response parameters for the API call +- Error code and description if failed + +Message format: + +``` + + ::= + {Application-ID} + {Access-Token} + {Input-Data-ID} + {Job-ID} + {Output-Data-Info} + {Response-Parameters} + {Error-Code} + +``` + +## 8.4 Signalling information for reference point *An* (Core network layer – UE) + +The *An* reference point between UE and the core network layer allows UE to request AI platform resources and to release the allocated resources. It also allows UE to invoke diverse API calls such as URI/URL direct to the API resource at core network layer AI platform. Scaling up or down the allocated resource is achieved by invoking the APIs related to the allocated resource usage. + +Figure 8-4 shows signalling flows for reference point *An*. + +![Figure 8-4: Signalling flows for reference point An. The diagram shows a User Equipment (UE) on the left and a Core network layer on the right. Six dashed arrows represent the following sequence of messages: 1. UE to Core network layer: AN resource allocation request; 2. Core network layer to UE: AN resource allocation response; 3. UE to Core network layer: AN resource release request; 4. Core network layer to UE: AN resource release response; 5. UE to Core network layer: AN API call; 6. Core network layer to UE: AN API call response. A small label 'Q.5008(23)' is at the bottom right of the diagram.](58f4167687de8d7339594e5f6fbe0bc6_img.jpg) + +Figure 8-4: Signalling flows for reference point An. The diagram shows a User Equipment (UE) on the left and a Core network layer on the right. Six dashed arrows represent the following sequence of messages: 1. UE to Core network layer: AN resource allocation request; 2. Core network layer to UE: AN resource allocation response; 3. UE to Core network layer: AN resource release request; 4. Core network layer to UE: AN resource release response; 5. UE to Core network layer: AN API call; 6. Core network layer to UE: AN API call response. A small label 'Q.5008(23)' is at the bottom right of the diagram. + +**Figure 8-4 – Signalling flows for reference point *An*** + +### 8.4.1 AN resource allocation request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.2 and shown in Figure 7-7, AI applications running on the UE may request the allocation of AI platform resources in the core network layer or in the edge access network layer. In order to request/response the resource allocation, the UE and AI platform service manager FE in the core network layer exchange the resource allocation request/response messages. + +#### 8.4.1.1 AN resource allocation request message + +To request the required AI platform resources such as AI infrastructure (e.g., AI processors), AI data repository storage, AI models, etc., UEs send resource allocation request messages to the AI platform service manager. The message may include information such as: + +- UE application ID which requests the resource allocation +- Authentication code +- Resource type for the allocation request +- Required resource descriptor which contains the amount of required capacity and technical specifications such as performance, throughput, latency and resiliency, etc. +- CRUD information + +Message format: + +``` + + ::= + {Application-ID} + +``` + +``` +{Authentication-Code} +{Resource-Type} +{Resource-Descriptor} +{CRUD-Info} +``` + +#### 8.4.1.2 AN resource allocation response message + +The AI Platform Service Manager at Core Network Layer responds to the UE's resource allocation request with Resource Allocation Response message. The message may include following information such as: + +- ID of the AI platform which provisions the requested resource +- UE application ID which requests the resource allocation +- Allocated resource type +- Allocated resource ID +- APIs each of which contains the URI/URL to access and utilize the allocated resource +- Allocated resource descriptor which contains the amount of required capacity and technical specifications such as performance, throughput, latency and resiliency, etc. +- CRUD information +- Constraint information for the access and the use of the allocated resource +- Resource provision result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= +{AI-Platform-ID} +{Application-ID} +{Resource-Type} +{Resource-ID} +{APIs} +{Resource-Descriptor} +{CRUD-Info} +{Constraint} +{Resource-Provision-Result} +``` + +### 8.4.2 AN resource release request and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.3 and shown in Figure 7-8, AI applications running on the UE may request the release of AI platform resources in the core network layer or in the edge access network layer. In order to request/response the resource release, the UE and AI platform service manager FE in the core network layer exchange the resource release request/response messages. + +#### 8.4.2.1 AN resource release request message + +To release the allocated resource, UEs send a resource release request message to the AI platform service manager at the core network layer. The message may include information such as: + +- ID of the AI platform which provisions the allocated resource +- UE application ID which requests the resource release +- Authentication code +- Allocated resource type to release +- Allocated resource ID to release + +- Reason to release + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {Application-ID} + {Authentication-Code} + {Resource-Type} + {Resource-ID} + {Reason} +``` + +##### 8.4.2.2 AN resource release response message + +The AI platform service manager at the core network layer responds to the UE's allocated resource release request with a resource release response message. The message may include information such as: + +- ID of the AI platform which released the allocated resource as requested +- UE application ID which requested the resource release +- Released resource type +- Released resource ID +- Resource release result + +Message format: + +``` + ::= + {AI-Platform-ID} + {Application-ID} + {Resource-Type} + {Resource-ID} + {Result} +``` + +### 8.4.3 AN API call and response messages + +As specified in clause 7.2.4 and shown in Figure 7-9 for the non-MEC environment case, AI applications running on the UE invoke API calls to utilize the support of necessary AI platform services in the core network layer. In order to request/response the services, UE and AI platform in the core network layer exchange the API call invoke/response messages. + +##### 8.4.3.1 AN API call message + +The UE invokes API calls to analyse and process data, to access and use resources including trained AI models and other AI services, which are provided by AI platforms at the core network layer. Each API call is made with the required parameters as specified in the posted API description. Although the required parameters may differ depending on the API, the API call message may include the following basic information: + +- UE application ID which invokes the API call +- Access token +- URI/URL to the API resource +- Input data information (e.g., URI/URL to upload payload, etc.) +- Required parameters for the API call + +Message format: + +``` + + ::= + {Application-ID} + {Access-Token} + {API-URI/URL} + {Input-Data-Info} + {Request-Parameters} + +``` + +##### 8.4.3.2 AN API call response message + +AI platforms respond to the invoked API calls with an API call response message. Response parameters for each API are made up in accordance with the response parameters as specified in the posted API description. Although the response parameters may differ depending on the API, the API call response message may include basic information such as: + +- UE application ID which invoked the API call +- Access token +- Uploaded input data ID +- Job ID of the API execution +- Output data information (e.g., URI/URL to output/meta data, etc.) +- Response parameters for the API call +- Error code and description if failed + +Message format: + +``` + + ::= + {Application-ID} + {Access-Token} + {Input-Data-ID} + {Job-ID} + {Output-Data-Info} + {Response-Parameters} + {Error-Code} + +``` + +# 9 Security considerations + +This Recommendation provides signalling requirements and architecture to support AI-based vertical services in future networks including IMT-2020 and beyond. These networks are subject to security and privacy measures, and sensitive information should be protected as a high priority in order to avoid leaking and unauthorized access. Security and privacy concerns should be aligned with the requirements specified in [b-ITU-T Y.3101] and [b-ITU-T Y.2701], together with the security framework from network function virtualization [b-ITU-T X.1046] and [b-ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022]. + +AI modelling and data handling for the AI platform services, in addition, require to be carried out with considerations for the security requirements such as those specified in [ITU-T M.3080], [ITU-T Y.3172], [ITU-T Y.3174] and [b-ITU-T X.1601]. + +# Appendix I + +## Use cases for AI service in vertical domains + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +AI can be used in different types of services across diverse industry verticals where optimized AI service provision is required. + +This appendix describes use cases of AI in vertical industry domains to illustrate the concept and service flow in domains, such as the public security, media, manufacturing and medical industry domains. Also, this appendix provides the flow of how raw vision data, image or video, is used by an AI to help improve traditional video surveillance-based monitoring systems. + +### I.1 Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Public security + +#### I.1.1 Use case: AI service based public security service to improve safety + +As shown in Figure I.1, AI function is applied to edge devices equipped with cameras, such as drone, surveillance cameras or a closed-circuit television (CCTV) system, or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) captures and analyses video data, or streams out the captured video data to cloud servers for analysis. Analysed data generated, either from devices or cloud servers, helps agents in the control centre of the security service providers to narrow down their focus on important events or issues from hundreds of monitors. It is hoped that the service based on this system will eventually contribute to building a safer society. + +![Figure I.1 – Concept of AI service in the security domain. The diagram shows a flow from Raw data (Vision data) to Security edge devices, then to Control centre, and finally to Agent dispatch. Icons represent each stage: a landscape image and play button for raw data; a camera, drone, and AI brain icon for edge devices; two monitors for the control centre; and a person icon for agent dispatch. The text 'Q.5008(23)' is in the bottom right corner.](5b6e139e89c6ce90107ea7d7d77620a0_img.jpg) + +``` +graph LR; A[Raw data (Vision data)] --> B[Security edge devices]; B --> C[Control centre]; C --> D[Agent dispatch]; +``` + +Figure I.1 – Concept of AI service in the security domain. The diagram shows a flow from Raw data (Vision data) to Security edge devices, then to Control centre, and finally to Agent dispatch. Icons represent each stage: a landscape image and play button for raw data; a camera, drone, and AI brain icon for edge devices; two monitors for the control centre; and a person icon for agent dispatch. The text 'Q.5008(23)' is in the bottom right corner. + +Figure I.1 – Concept of AI service in the security domain + +The service will be largely provided to the areas such as public safety and security, protection of national infrastructures and facilities, or prevention of serious industrial disasters. + +#### I.1.2 Service scenario: AI in security domain + +Figure I.2 illustrates a service scenario based on AI in a security domain. The scenario constitutes two parts. First a 'learning and modelling' part followed by a 'service provision' part. + +##### a) Learning and modelling + +An AI automation platform labels the very first sets of data generated from edge devices such as CCTV, drone, or LiDAR and trains to create an initial AI model. Through validation, testing and additional training, the AI platform reinforces the AI model with higher accuracy. + +##### b) Service provision + +In the service provision step, the generated AI model is deployed to diverse edge devices in the fields where the security solutions are required, such as roadways, construction sites, or national facilities with high importance. Edge devices capture images or video in each site and stream the data to the security control centre. Then, the agents in the control centre analyse the image and video data, signal check for false alarms, and most importantly can focus on important events or issues that have occurred. The set of meta data generated during the validation process can be used to improve the accuracy of the AI model. + +![Figure I.2: AI service scenario in the security domain. A sequence diagram showing the flow from raw data ingestion to AI modelling, edge device monitoring, security control center verification, and customer notification.](c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the AI service scenario in the security domain, organized into two main phases: "AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure" and "AI service". + +- AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure:** + - Raw data (AI processor, AI database):** Provides an "Initial data set (Auto/manually labelled)". + - AI modelling:** Processes the data through "AI data set ingestion and training", "AI model generation", "Validation, testing and label correction", and "Train with new data set and improve AI model". It then "Apply final AI model to edge devices" and later "Improve and optimise AI model" based on feedback. +- AI service:** + - Edge device:** "Check for security event occurred and send out signal" to the security control centre. + - Security control centre:** Performs a "Cross check false alarm" and then initiates a "Follow-up action to the scene (i.e., patrol team dispatch)". It also sends "analysed data from the scene and feedback, metadata" back to the AI modelling phase. + - Customer:** Receives the follow-up action from the security control centre. + +Reference: Q.5008(23) + +Figure I.2: AI service scenario in the security domain. A sequence diagram showing the flow from raw data ingestion to AI modelling, edge device monitoring, security control center verification, and customer notification. + +**Figure I.2 – AI service scenario in the security domain** + +### I.2 Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Media + +This appendix describes the flow how the source data, image or video, is used by an AI to help improve streaming services, such as internet protocol television (IPTV) or over-the-top (OTT) streaming services. + +#### I.2.1 Use case: AI-based streaming service to upscale video data + +As shown in Figure I.3, AI is used in video upscaling and streaming services. As display technologies are advancing rapidly, old videos that were taken in low resolution cannot catch-up with display requirements, stimulating the industry's needs in video upscaling solutions. Appendix II explains how AI can help significantly improve the video upscaling process and how media service providers can enhance the quality of streamed videos. + +![Figure I.3: Concept of AI full stack-based service in the media domain. A flow diagram showing video upscaling from source data (480p SD, 1080p FULL HD) through an upscaling server using AI, to a media centre/broadcasting centre, and finally to a set-top box/OTT streaming app (720p HD, 4K ULTRA HD).](98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the concept of AI full stack-based service in the media domain, showing the flow of video data through upscaling: + +- Source video data:** Initial resolutions include "480p SD" and "1080p FULL HD". +- Upscaling server:** Utilizes AI (represented by a cloud with "AI" and server icons) to process the video. +- Media centre/broadcasting centre:** The processed video is sent to the media centre for distribution. +- Set-top box/OTT streaming App:** The final output resolutions are "720p HD" and "4K ULTRA HD". + +Reference: Q.5008(23) + +Figure I.3: Concept of AI full stack-based service in the media domain. A flow diagram showing video upscaling from source data (480p SD, 1080p FULL HD) through an upscaling server using AI, to a media centre/broadcasting centre, and finally to a set-top box/OTT streaming app (720p HD, 4K ULTRA HD). + +**Figure I.3 – Concept of AI full stack-based service in the media domain** + +#### I.2.2 Service scenario: AI service in media domain + +Figure I.4 illustrates a service scenario based on AI in the media domain. The scenario constitutes two parts, 'learning and modelling' and 'service provision'. + +##### a) Learning and modelling + +High-quality video data sources are ingested to an AI automation platform and help the platform generate the initial AI model. Through the repetitive training-validation-testing process, the AI platform reinforces the AI model with higher accuracy, and generates the final AI model that can be used in commercial-grade video upscaling services. + +##### b) Service provision + +In the service provision step, the generated AI model is deployed to media upscaling servers in the data centre of media service providers, such as broadcasting stations, IPTV service providers or even OTT service providers. The deployed AI model upscaling video, or images into high-quality media data. In the case of video, the model can upscale SD quality video to HD, and FHD quality video to 4K UHD grade. After the video upscaling is finished, the media centre or broadcasting centre transmits the upscaled video data to customer-side set-top boxes or streaming applications to provide an enhanced media experience. The same upscaling scheme can be also used to franchise movie theatre networks, by sending out video data to each theatre's micro-data centres in the site. + +![Sequence diagram of AI service scenario in the media domain](a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the AI service scenario in the media domain, divided into two main phases: 'AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure' and 'AI service'. + +**AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure:** + +- Raw data (AI processor, AI database):** Source video data (480p SD, 1080p FULL HD) is ingested for AI data set ingestion and training. +- AI modelling:** The process involves AI model generation, validation, testing, and training with new data sets to improve AI upscaling quality. +- Upscaling server:** The final AI model is applied to the upscaling server. + +**AI service:** + +- Upscaling server:** Performs video upscaling (SD > HD, FHD > 4K UHD). +- Media centre/broadcasting centre:** The encoder transmits the upscaled video to the media centre/broadcasting centre. +- Set-top box/OTT streaming App.:** Streams high-quality upscaled video data (720p HD, 4K ULTRA HD) through the customer's device. + +**Feedback Loop:** Upscaled data and feedback, metadata are transferred from the media centre/broadcasting centre back to the AI modelling phase to improve and optimize the AI model. + +Sequence diagram of AI service scenario in the media domain + +Figure I.4 – AI service scenario in the media domain + +### I.3 Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Industry (manufacturing/logistics) + +This appendix describes the flow of how source data is used by an AI full stack to help improve efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and logistics. + +#### I.3.1 Use case: AI service to add intelligence to factory/logistics machines + +As shown in Figure I.5, an AI full stack is used to upgrade equipment such as robot-based depalletization, or 5G-AI machine vision solutions that are used in smart factories and smart logistics centres. Appendix I.3 explains how AI can add intelligence to industry-grade robots or equipment, and help employees to enhance workplace efficiency and productivity, which will eventually lead to revenue increase. + +![Figure I.5: Concept of AI service in industry (manufacturing/logistics) domain. The diagram shows a three-step flow: 1. Edge devices (i.e., camera) capture image/video. 2. Image interpretation/decision maker (Cloud/on-premise) processes the data. 3. Edge devices (Robots) are machine controlled based on the decision. The flow is indicated by large grey arrows. Icons represent each step: a camera and a robot arm for the first step, a server rack and a brain icon for the second, and a robot arm for the third. A small label 'Q.5008(23)' is at the bottom right.](3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a three-step process for AI service in industry. Step 1: 'Edge devices (i.e., camera)' are used to 'Capture image/video', represented by an icon of a camera and a robot arm. Step 2: 'Image interpretation/decision maker' (Cloud/on-premise) processes the data, represented by icons of a server rack and a brain. Step 3: 'Edge devices (Robots)' are 'Machine controlled based on decision', represented by an icon of a robot arm. Large grey arrows indicate the flow from left to right. A small label 'Q.5008(23)' is at the bottom right. + +Figure I.5: Concept of AI service in industry (manufacturing/logistics) domain. The diagram shows a three-step flow: 1. Edge devices (i.e., camera) capture image/video. 2. Image interpretation/decision maker (Cloud/on-premise) processes the data. 3. Edge devices (Robots) are machine controlled based on the decision. The flow is indicated by large grey arrows. Icons represent each step: a camera and a robot arm for the first step, a server rack and a brain icon for the second, and a robot arm for the third. A small label 'Q.5008(23)' is at the bottom right. + +Figure I.5 – Concept of AI service in industry (manufacturing/logistics) domain + +#### I.3.2 Service scenario: AI service in industry (manufacturing and logistics) domain + +Figure I.6 illustrates a service scenario based on AI in an industry (manufacturing and logistics) domain. This scenario constitutes two parts, a 'learning and modelling' part, where the edge devices take images or videos of manufactured items for analysis, and a 'service provision' part, where the edge devices perform their tasks following the decisions made. + +##### a) Learning and modelling + +High-quality video data sources that illustrate 'defects' of manufactured goods are ingested to an AI automation platform and help the platform generate the initial AI model. Through the repetitive training-validation-testing process, the AI platform reinforces the AI model with higher accuracy to detect defects. The final AI model generated is deployed to smart factory solutions or smart logistics solutions. + +##### b) Service provision + +In the service provision step, the generated AI model is deployed to decision/interpretation servers, which are a part of smart factory solutions. The AI model can also be loaded to robot vision services, such as (de)palletization, to help edge devices such as brainless robots or machine vision solutions to perform designated jobs by receiving control signals from the decision or interpretation server. + +![Figure I.6 – AI full stack-based service scenario in the industry domain. This sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between four main components: Raw data (AI processor, AI database), AI modelling, Decision/interpretation server, and Edge device (i.e., factory/robots). The process starts with an initial data set (Auto/manually labelled) being ingested and trained. The AI modelling phase involves AI model generation, validation, testing, and label correction, followed by training with new data sets to improve the model. The final AI model is applied to the decision/interpretation server. The edge device transmits image/video data from a production line to the server, which then transmits a decision signal back to the edge device. The edge device processes the signal to perform pre-defined jobs. Finally, the decision/interpretation server transfers analysed data, scene information, and feedback metadata back to the AI modelling phase, which then improves and optimizes the AI model. The diagram is divided into two main phases: 'AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure' and 'AI service'.](7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant Raw data as Raw data (AI processor, AI database) + participant AI modelling as AI modelling + participant Decision/interpretation server as Decision/interpretation server + participant Edge device as Edge device (i.e., factory/robots) + + Note left of Raw data: AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure + Note right of Edge device: AI service + + Raw data->>AI modelling: Initial data set (Auto/manually labelled) +AI data set ingestion and training + AI modelling->>AI modelling: AI model generation + AI modelling->>AI modelling: Validation, testing and label correction + AI modelling->>AI modelling: Train with new data set and improve AI model + AI modelling->>Decision/interpretation server: Apply final AI model to decision/interpretation server + Edge device->>Decision/interpretation server: Transmit image/video data from production line + Decision/interpretation server->>Edge device: Transmit decision signal + Edge device->>Edge device: Process signal to perform pre-defined jobs + Decision/interpretation server->>AI modelling: Transfer analysed data from the scene and feedback, metadata + AI modelling->>AI modelling: Improve and optimize AI model + +``` + +Q.5008(23) + +Figure I.6 – AI full stack-based service scenario in the industry domain. This sequence diagram illustrates the interaction between four main components: Raw data (AI processor, AI database), AI modelling, Decision/interpretation server, and Edge device (i.e., factory/robots). The process starts with an initial data set (Auto/manually labelled) being ingested and trained. The AI modelling phase involves AI model generation, validation, testing, and label correction, followed by training with new data sets to improve the model. The final AI model is applied to the decision/interpretation server. The edge device transmits image/video data from a production line to the server, which then transmits a decision signal back to the edge device. The edge device processes the signal to perform pre-defined jobs. Finally, the decision/interpretation server transfers analysed data, scene information, and feedback metadata back to the AI modelling phase, which then improves and optimizes the AI model. The diagram is divided into two main phases: 'AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure' and 'AI service'. + +**Figure I.6 – AI full stack-based service scenario in the industry domain** + +### **I.4 Use cases for AI service in vertical domains: Medical** + +This appendix describes the flow of how the source data is used by an AI full stack to help doctors to get assistance from medical AI solutions in disease diagnosis [b-ITU-T Y-Sup.55]. + +#### **I.4.1 Use case: AI service to add intelligence to diagnosis assistance solutions** + +As shown in Figure I.7, AI is used to help doctors by adding intelligence to medical devices that assist decision-making in diagnosing diseases such as brain disease or pneumonia where doctors have to look at and check the images or videos taken from the devices manually. By deploying AI engines to the diagnosis assistance solution, the overall accuracy of a doctor's diagnosis can be assisted through a diagnosis assistance solution and so accuracy when making a diagnosis is enhanced. + +![Figure I.7 – Concept of AI service in medical domain. The diagram illustrates a workflow for AI-assisted medical diagnosis. It starts with an 'Edge device' (represented by a camera icon and a brain scan image) sending data to a 'Doctor w/ picture archiving and communication system (PACS)' (represented by a doctor icon and a PACS icon). The PACS sends data to a 'Diagnosis assistance solution' (represented by a server icon and an AI brain icon). The solution sends data to a 'Final diagnosis' (represented by a doctor icon and a brain scan image with a red box highlighting a region). A small text 'Q.5008(23)' is visible in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.](f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg) + +Figure I.7 – Concept of AI service in medical domain. The diagram illustrates a workflow for AI-assisted medical diagnosis. It starts with an 'Edge device' (represented by a camera icon and a brain scan image) sending data to a 'Doctor w/ picture archiving and communication system (PACS)' (represented by a doctor icon and a PACS icon). The PACS sends data to a 'Diagnosis assistance solution' (represented by a server icon and an AI brain icon). The solution sends data to a 'Final diagnosis' (represented by a doctor icon and a brain scan image with a red box highlighting a region). A small text 'Q.5008(23)' is visible in the bottom right corner of the diagram area. + +**Figure I.7 – Concept of AI service in medical domain** + +#### **I.4.2 Service scenario: AI service in medical industry domain (Medical)** + +Figure I.8 illustrates a service scenario based on an AI full stack in the medical industry domain. The scenario constitutes two parts, the 'learning and modelling' part where the AI model learns medical vision AI data from X-rays and MRIs to build the final AI model for disease analysis. In the 'service provision', part the AI model deployed in the diagnosis assistance solutions receives data from edge devices to perform the diagnosis assistance functions, and transmits analysed results to the picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), or to doctors directly, so that the doctor who received the analysed data can sum up diagnosis resulting from visual inspection, and the result from the diagnosis assistance solution. This will eventually help improve the accuracy rate of disease diagnosis. + +##### **A) Learning and modelling** + +High-quality video and image data sources already taken by medical devices, such as X-rays and MRIs, which illustrate certain diseases inside the human body, such as brain disease or pneumonia. Utilizing the ingested raw data, the AI automation platform generates an initial AI model and through the repetitive training-validation-testing process, the AI platform reinforces an AI model with higher accuracy to detect disease. The final AI model generated is deployed to the diagnosis assistance solutions. + +##### **b) Service provision** + +In the service provision step, the generated AI model is deployed to the diagnosis assistance solution servers, to detect disease which the model has learned through the learning process. As medical edge devices take new images or videos from the patient, it transmits data through PACS, and the diagnosis assistance solution uses received data to interpret and make analysis results on each ingested data. Simultaneously, the doctor also conducts a visual inspection using PACS, manually to make his or her own decision. Finally, as the doctor sums up the analysed result created by the AI model and visual inspection, and the doctor comes up with final diagnosis result. Through this process, medical institutions, such as hospitals, can reach higher accuracy in disease diagnosis. + +![Sequence diagram of an AI service scenario in the medical domain. The diagram is divided into two main phases: 'AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure' and 'AI service'. Lifelines include Raw data (AI processor, AI database), AI modelling, Diagnosis assistance solution (Server), Edge device/PACS, and Doctors (w/ PACS). The process involves data ingestion, model training, validation, and finally applying the model to a decision server which then interacts with PACS and doctors for visual inspection and feedback.](e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant RawData as Raw data (AI processor, AI database) + participant AIModel as AI modelling + participant Server as Diagnosis assistance solution (Server) + participant PACS as Edge device/PACS + participant Doctors as Doctors (w/ PACS) + + Note left of RawData: AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure + Note right of PACS: AI service + + RawData->>AIModel: Initial data set (Auto/manually labelled) +AI data set ingestion and training + AIModel->>AIModel: AI model generation + AIModel->>AIModel: Validation, testing and label correction + AIModel->>AIModel: Train with new data set and improve AI model + AIModel->>Server: Apply final AI model to decision/interpretation server + Server->>PACS: Transmits medical images/videos through PACS + PACS->>Doctors: Transmits medical images/videos through PACS + Doctors->>Doctors: Visual inspection + PACS->>Server: Interpretation/analysis + Server->>Doctors: Transmits interpreted/analysed data + Doctors->>Doctors: Visual inspection + Server->>Server: Transfer analysed data from the scene and feedback, metadata + Server->>Server: Improve and optimize AI model + +``` + +Q.5008(23) + +Sequence diagram of an AI service scenario in the medical domain. The diagram is divided into two main phases: 'AI learning and modelling based on AI infrastructure' and 'AI service'. Lifelines include Raw data (AI processor, AI database), AI modelling, Diagnosis assistance solution (Server), Edge device/PACS, and Doctors (w/ PACS). The process involves data ingestion, model training, validation, and finally applying the model to a decision server which then interacts with PACS and doctors for visual inspection and feedback. + +**Figure I.8 – AI service scenario in the medical domain** + +# Appendix II + +## AI base service implementation model + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +Generating AI models for the AI-based services requires a huge amount of high-performance AI dedicated cloud resources and expertise. + +Running such a required environment is often a heavy burden for individual AI-based service providers and even for small and medium sized businesses (enterprises). + +IMT-2020 network operators run large-scale cloud computing facilities in their networks including edge cloud. Automated AI modelling and services support platform (i.e., AI platform), in their cloud facilities and can provide required resources and services for the AI-based service providers to develop and deploy the necessary AI models and applications. [b-ITU-T Y.3100] + +Figure II.1 shows an AI-based service implementation model. + +### II.1 AI platform + +Technical components of the AI platform, which are required to support automated AI modelling and services, are: + +- AI data repository and database management system (DBMS) +AI data repository and DBMS stores and searches raw data, trained data, and meta data for AI learning and modelling. +- Automated AI modelling tools +Automated AI modelling tools perform the general AI modelling suitable for the AI services based on the labelled data. +- Data warehouse +Data warehouse builds the pipeline of data collection, annotation and labelling, AI learning and modelling, and AI model deployment process. +- AI processors and accelerators +Dedicated AI processors, i.e., neural processing units (NPUs) and accelerators provide optimized high-performance AI algorithm operations for deep learning and inference, etc. +- APIs for AI service +Open API for the interworking with 3rd party systems and devices. + +![Figure II.1 – AI-based service implementation model. A flowchart showing the interaction between an IMT-2020 network operator and an AI-based service provider. The process is divided into three phases: Data collection and processing, AI learning and modelling, and AI based vertical services provision and consumption. The IMT-2020 network operator's AI platform handles steps 1 (AI data set ingestion), 2 (Initial AI model generation), and 3 (AI model re-enforcement). The AI-based service provider handles step 4 (Deploy final AI model) and interacts with the end user. Step 5 (Field data, feedback, metadata) is a continuous loop between the provider and the operator's platform. A box on the right indicates 'The scope of this Rec.' covers the provider's activities.](e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the AI-based service implementation model, structured into three main phases: + +- Data collection and processing phase:** + - The **IMT-2020 network operator** receives an **Initial data set (Auto/manually labelled)** from the **AI based service provider**. + - Step ①: **AI data set ingestion (Annotation and labelling)** occurs within the operator's **AI platform (Automated AI modelling and service support)**. +- AI learning and modelling phase:** + - Step ②: **Initial AI model generation** is performed by the operator's AI platform, resulting in an **Initial AI model**. + - Step ③: **AI model re-enforcement (Repetitive training with new data set and improve AI model)** is conducted by the operator's AI platform, leading to a **Final AI model**. + - The operator's AI platform includes components: **AI data repository and DBMS**, **Automated AI modelling tools**, **Data warehouse**, **APIs for AI service**, and **AI processors and accelerators etc.** +- AI based vertical services provision and consumption phase:** + - Step ④: **Deploy final AI model** is executed by the **AI based service provider**, placing the model in the **Core/edge cloud**. + - Step ⑤: **Field data, feedback, metadata** is generated by the **AI based service consumer (End user)** and sent back to the operator's AI platform. + - The **AI based service provider** also hosts **AI capable edge device/server** units. + +A note on the right side of the diagram states: *The scope of this Rec.* + +Figure II.1 – AI-based service implementation model. A flowchart showing the interaction between an IMT-2020 network operator and an AI-based service provider. The process is divided into three phases: Data collection and processing, AI learning and modelling, and AI based vertical services provision and consumption. The IMT-2020 network operator's AI platform handles steps 1 (AI data set ingestion), 2 (Initial AI model generation), and 3 (AI model re-enforcement). The AI-based service provider handles step 4 (Deploy final AI model) and interacts with the end user. Step 5 (Field data, feedback, metadata) is a continuous loop between the provider and the operator's platform. A box on the right indicates 'The scope of this Rec.' covers the provider's activities. + +**Figure II.1 – AI-based service implementation model** + +### II.2 Roles in the AI-based service implementation model + +From a logical point of view, AI-based service implementation involves following three distinct roles: + +#### 1) AI-based service provider + +The AI-based service provider is an entity that provides services to the AI-based service consumer e.g., end user customers or devices in the field. + +It hosts end user consumers and provides AI-based services (i.e., AI applications) developed based on the AI models. AI models to be used for the AI applications are generated with the support of the IMT-2020 network operator's AI platform and can be deployed either in the IMT-2020 network operator's edge/core network cloud or in the AI-based service provider's own facility. + +If an enterprise or an institution builds the AI-based services for its own use, it plays both the AI-based service provider role and the consumer role at the same time. + +To provide AI-based services to the end user consumers, the service provider may run AI capable edge devices/servers on which the AI model is loaded. For example, the drones, surveillance cameras or LiDAR in the 'public security services' use case can be considered as the AI-based service provider's edge devices. In the use case scenarios of Appendix I, the 'upscaling server in video upscaling and streaming service' use case, the 'decision/interpretation server in manufacturing and logistics' use case and the 'diagnosis assistance solution server in intelligent diagnosis assistance medical service' use case can be considered as examples of an AI-based service provider's servers. + +For the AI model reinforcement, AI-based service providers transfer analysed data from the field, feedback and metadata to the AI platform of the IMT-2020 network operator. In the use case scenarios of the Appendix I, this is performed by the 'decision/interpretation server' of the security control centre in the 'public security service' use case, and the media centre/broadcasting centre in the 'video upscaling and streaming service' use case. In contrast with other use case scenarios, the 'diagnosis assistance solution server' performs the AI model reinforcement in the AI-based service provider's facility instead of the AI platform of the IMT-2020 network operator. + +#### **2) IMT-2020 network operator** + +The IMT-2020 network operator provides automated AI modelling support for the AI-based service provider role entities. Its AI platform generates trained AI models to be deployed. AI-based service providers load them on their edge devices and servers through APIs for AI services. + +The IMT-2020 network operator can also host and serve AI-based service end user consumers directly at its edge/core cloud. In such cases, it plays both the IMT-2020 network operator role in the sense of providing the AI platform and also plays the AI-based service provider role in the sense of providing the service to the end user consumer. + +#### **3) AI-based service consumer (end user)** + +The end user is an entity that consumes the service hosted by AI-based service providers. It can be an end user equipment or a customer such as, in the use case scenarios of Appendix I, a set-top box/OTT streaming App in the 'video upscaling and streaming service' use case, factory/robots in the 'manufacturing and logistics' use case, PACS and doctors with PACS in the 'intelligent diagnosis assistance medical service' use case. + +When the factory/robots are run by an AI-based service provider, they are considered as the end user equipment from a logical point of view even though they are edge devices of the service provider. + +### **II.3 AI-based service implementation phases** + +AI-based services are implemented in the following three phases: + +#### **1) Data collection and processing phase** + +AI-based service providers provide the initial AI data set for learning and modelling. The initial AI data set, which is captured and analysed either from their AI functions running on the edge devices or cloud servers, may be labelled manually. Then the IMT-2020 network operator's AI platform ingests the initial AI data set by performing the annotation and labelling process. + +This data collection and ingestion procedure between AI-based service providers and IMT-2020 network operator's AI platform is out of scope of this Recommendation. + +#### **2) AI learning and modelling phase** + +With the ingested initial AI data, the AI platform generates the initial AI model. Through the repetitive training with validation and testing processes for the new data set, the AI platform reinforces the AI model with improved accuracy, and generates the final AI model. + +#### **3) AI-based services provision and consumption phase** + +The generated AI model is deployed to diverse AI capable edge devices in the field and servers in the AI-based service provider's facility such as security control centre, media/broadcasting centre, or on-premises cloud server, etc. as described in Appendix. According to circumstances, they can be deployed in the core/edge network clouds too. + +End user customers or devices consume the service provided by the AI applications. AI-based service provider's edge devices or servers on which AI model or application is loaded, capture and analyse the field data during the provider's own validation process and generate a set of meta data and feedback. They transfer these data to the AI platform to be used for the AI model reinforcement. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T X.1046] Recommendation ITU-T X.1046 (2020), *Framework of software-defined security in software-defined networks/network functions virtualization networks.* +- [b-ITU-T X.1601] Recommendation ITU-T X.1601 (2015), *Security framework for cloud computing* +- [b-ITU-T Y.2701] Recommendation ITU-T Y.2701 (2007), *Security requirements for NGN release 1.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.3100] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3100 (2017), *Terms and definitions for IMT-2020 network.* +- [b-ITU-T Y.3101] Recommendation ITU-T Y.3101 (2018), *Requirements of the IMT-2020 network.* +- [b-ITU-T Y-Sup.55] ITU-T Y.3170-series Recommendations – Supplement 55 (2019), *Machine learning in future networks including IMT-2020: use cases.* +- [b-ETSI GR ENI 004] ETSI GR ENI 004 V1.1.1 (2018), *Experiential Networked Intelligence (ENI); Terminology for Main Concepts in ENI.* +- [b-ETSI GS MEC 001] ETSI GS MEC 001 (2019), *Multi-access edge computing (MEC) terminology.* +- [b-ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022] ETSI GS NFV-SEC 022 (2020), *Network functions virtualisation (NFV) release 2; Security; Access token specification for API access.* +- [b-ISO/IEC 22989] ISO/IEC 22989:2022, *Information technology – Artificial intelligence – Artificial intelligence concepts and terminology.* + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..985ce4f109b67d2faa0bfb4095195a8c8daeb31f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:df1fd24c75458ea11a4825ba5d66828f9be3dd9f00ac276be6c1bcb17fce8e9f +size 7269 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06a877284a565927e03349bd72e563b03d5c3a07 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0adb6b0a81a188c7b10cbad9218f8381d0b26f63636b366a664bc1aa9424db6a +size 28829 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d54012c85293077287b916e5cdf08d21efdb2c91 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4e98392c06869c35fd1fd95dd5eae6d8e04e7cd4accae294e2fa77230f44356f +size 32625 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e488de744ea71f717cf54ae6a2e221c73c9c7cb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/367926125450c2bc3f4bdca9d59a62ba_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:50111e9270630091c35d3119e084e125874bacf8a225fd2a725f982f2571c294 +size 72313 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce25b5a9cf8bdf05ce3dc91931cc6796cbcdc033 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/4e4be0bd8b235167902f2c03e41da651_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ef5f7ca7de9e5dde15fc83120d22f30a9ef4d1177bde9044e92c74c59352f688 +size 38223 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..701b13fbd9c659ca60ae5e5e4d86e1c05135a4f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f20bfa46bbb8078e765dee56d0e0cca40e276e180cd215e32f5f123e36d871f2 +size 24716 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ef329bd1f3db1e939cb24a9a449d41878f386ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:76fca507f65e9260a9f3b5ed489b8e396a54d01951fffe3a1c1a21409348d100 +size 42942 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/ca7c7526ec57cd5a2f278c194c0a6a00_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/ca7c7526ec57cd5a2f278c194c0a6a00_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1fa09ef5b946d624c70708425071f8f5571430c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5026-202307-I_PDF-E/ca7c7526ec57cd5a2f278c194c0a6a00_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4d4bc54a842a2c5ea0c1dbb024b2d5d78c3e6a998d139abd3fdaea8fd3b7ab15 +size 24515 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1629394c02f697f60ae954ad36bf274fa8082cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3763acd7a0ed56aa30f3f90468c1fb0cb54573eb9045bca3eddf8976b4f0f41d +size 7219 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3da82c5465d856d64c4b94aaf7d1e161f88c39bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:237a8462acfb90e210fae0f6464fe83a1e797a7960f831ab34db7d1725f74daa +size 106188 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5eeaaf18e05608344ef3727f48caa67b8ae3be8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c6d67d65929cb3ffba4a3db38d1f9c5c585cf1bc6aac3338374aeb43f34b130 +size 67894 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/d864789b0d8384da1d22fd6a5d76bbdf_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/d864789b0d8384da1d22fd6a5d76bbdf_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d47d4ea4e6d9a3816ff7be6fc40e994d018a4d3c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/d864789b0d8384da1d22fd6a5d76bbdf_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:12db53ea827eee9d43d260ed5214fa15a65021f6cc330b0f4aa196bdfcd9d886 +size 91677 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e1f16ab21766ca8dd504b36041d5b4a1d88aac5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5030-202406-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,514 @@ + + +# Recommendation**ITU-T Q.5030 (06/2024)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +Signalling requirements and protocols for IMT-2020 – +Protocols for IMT-2020 + +--- + +### **Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font superimposed on the globe. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +# **Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS | Q.4160-Q.4179 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5019 | +| Protocols for IMT-2020 | Q.5020-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.5030 + +# Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.5030 defines data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system. The data management interface includes data resources and interfaces for data processing. The data resources can be used to decide what data are for. There are a lot of data needed to check environment and growing status. The interfaces for data processing define web-based application programming interface (API) including data creation, retrieving, update and deletion. + +## History \* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.5030 | 2024-06-29 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/15980 | + +## Keywords + +Aquaculture, data management, edge, flowing-water. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, and information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2024 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 1 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 1 | +| 6 Overview ..... | 2 | +| 7 Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system..... | 4 | +| 7.1 Interfaces for network functions..... | 4 | +| 7.2 Data resources ..... | 4 | +| 7.3 Interfaces for data processing..... | 10 | +| Bibliography..... | 15 | + + + +###### Recommendation ITU-T Q.5030 + +## Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation addresses data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture service including the following: + +- An overview of an intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system; +- Data management interfaces for an intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[ITU-T Q.5001] Recommendation ITU-T Q.5001 (2018), *Signalling requirements and architecture of intelligent edge computing*. + +[IETF RFC 7159] IETF RFC 7159 (2014), *The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format*. + +[IETF RFC 7231] IETF RFC 7231 (2014), *Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content*. + +# 3 Definitions + +None. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|------|---------------------------------| +| AI | Artificial Intelligence | +| IEC | Intelligent Edge Computing | +| JSON | JavaScript Object Notation | +| REST | Representational State Transfer | + +# 5 Conventions + +Resource elements in clause 7.2 and fields of message under clause 7.3 are encoded in JavaScript object notation (JSON) [IETF RFC 7159], and the grammar used in representing objects defined in this Recommendation is as follows: + +- "STRING" and "NUMBER" types are used to indicate string and number, respectively; + +- An array of collective values are enclosed in brackets "[ ]" with value separated by commas " , ". + - "MIN" means minimum value, while "MAX" means maximum value. + +### 6 Overview + +The flowing-water smart aquaculture system aims to increase the productivity of aquaculture and promote eco-friendly aquaculture technology by applying IoT, ICT, big data and AI technologies to traditional aquaculture systems. Figure 6-1 illustrates the conceptual diagram of the flowing-water smart aquaculture system. This system consists of a sensor unit, an actuator unit and a control unit. The sensor unit collects water quality data such as temperature and salinity using IoT sensors, as well as energy data such as current and power, growth data such as fish size, and environmental data such as temperature and humidity. The actuator unit is composed of various equipment related to data monitoring devices, breeding water supply devices, feed supply devices, water quality management devices, power supply devices and various other materials related to the operation of aquaculture facilities. The control unit stores and manages the collected data using internal storage space or by connecting to external databases while managing and controlling the devices connected to the actuator unit. The control unit may include basic control algorithms and can provide interfaces for external systems if necessary. + +![Figure 6-1 – Concept of flowing-water smart aquaculture system](d864789b0d8384da1d22fd6a5d76bbdf_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a central circular fish tank with various sensors and actuators. To the left, a building with a large antenna represents a data center or cloud platform, with a callout for 'Productivity improvement' showing people monitoring data on screens. Above the tank, 'Actuator units' are shown near the 'Influent' water supply. To the right, 'Control units' are depicted as a person at a computer workstation, with 'Drainage' pipes leading away from the tank. At the bottom right, a 'Disease diagnosis' callout shows a handheld device and a microscope view of a cell. Wireless signals connect the various components. + +Figure 6-1 – Concept of flowing-water smart aquaculture system + +**Figure 6-1 – Concept of flowing-water smart aquaculture system** + +The emergence of big data and artificial intelligence technologies has enabled powerful performance and resources for managing and analysing vast amounts of data through cloud platform services, which can now support smart aquaculture technology. Additionally, cloud platform services can autonomously control equipment or machinery and support remote monitoring through web or mobile applications. Data collected and analysed in cloud platforms can be used to create new fusion services in different domains, forming an efficient food supply chain that includes production, processing, distribution, consumption and disposal. However, network disconnections between smart aquaculture + +2 Rec. ITU-T Q.5030 (06/2024) + +systems and cloud servers can occur due to various causes such as power outages or cable breaks. Signal delays between them can also lead to unreliable results in the remote control of equipment or machinery, such as pumps, feed dispensers or water treatment devices that require precise control. Furthermore, network costs can be a problem when all collected data needs to be transmitted to a central cloud server. As a result, edge clouds have emerged to improve cloud services, and the IoT industry has adopted IoT edge-cloud technology to manage vast amounts of diverse IoT devices and provide latency-sensitive services. + +The intelligent edge computing (IEC) architecture defines a well-defined cloud infrastructure as a signal delivery architecture and reference point. Figure 6-2 shows the concept of a flowing-water smart aquaculture system based on the IEC. This Recommendation defines a data management interface for IEC-based smart aquaculture systems. + +![Diagram of an IEC-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system architecture showing Cloud server, Edge server, Sensor units, and Actuator units for multiple systems.](562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture of an IEC-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system. At the top is a **Cloud server** (white rounded rectangle). Below it are two identical system blocks, **Flowing-water smart aquaculture system #1** and **Flowing-water smart aquaculture system #n**, separated by an ellipsis. Each system block contains an **Edge server** (grey rounded rectangle) which is bidirectionally connected to the Cloud server. Below the Edge server in each system are **Sensor units** and **Actuator units** (black rounded rectangles), both of which are bidirectionally connected to the Edge server. The Sensor units and Actuator units are further detailed with specific components: + +- Sensor units:** + - System #1: Water temperature, Dissolved oxygen, Salinity, Current, Growth, Environment. + - System #n: Water temperature, pH, Turbidity, Current, Growth, Environment. +- Actuator units:** + - System #1: LCD, Pump, Tank, Camera, Sterilizer, Feeder, Heat pump, Power, Oxygen generator, PLC. + - System #n: LCD, Pump, Tank, Sterilizer, Feeder, Heat pump, Power, Exhauster, Oxygen generator. + +A legend at the bottom indicates the color coding for the components: **Cloud** (white), **IEC** (grey), and **TE** (black). The reference number **Q.5030(24)** is shown in the bottom right corner. + +Diagram of an IEC-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system architecture showing Cloud server, Edge server, Sensor units, and Actuator units for multiple systems. + +**Figure 6-2 – Concept of an IEC-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system** + +As the well-defined edge-cloud infrastructure, IEC architecture [ITU-T Q.5001] defines signalling architecture and reference points. Figure 6-3 highlights the reference points which this Recommendation uses. This Recommendation defines data management APIs for IEC-based flowing-water smart aquaculture systems. + +![Figure 6-3: Reference points of IEC [ITU-T Q.5001] used in this Recommendation. The diagram shows the architecture of intelligent edge computing, including a Terminal entity (TE), Edge networking entity, Intelligent computing entity, and Edge gateway entity. It details data flow reference points (Dx), control flow reference points (Cx), and model update reference points (Ux) between these components and external entities like Big data analytics in the cloud and IEC.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +Dx – Identifier for data flow reference points    Cx – Identifier for control flow reference points    Ux – Identifier for model update reference points    Q.5030(24) + +Figure 6-3: Reference points of IEC [ITU-T Q.5001] used in this Recommendation. The diagram shows the architecture of intelligent edge computing, including a Terminal entity (TE), Edge networking entity, Intelligent computing entity, and Edge gateway entity. It details data flow reference points (Dx), control flow reference points (Cx), and model update reference points (Ux) between these components and external entities like Big data analytics in the cloud and IEC. + +**Figure 6-3 – Reference points of IEC [ITU-T Q.5001] used in this Recommendation** + +# 7 Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based flowing-water smart aquaculture system + +For extensibility, APIs follow representational state transfer (REST) architecture [b-Fielding] and payloads are encoded in JavaScript object notation (JSON) [IETF RFC 7159]. + +## 7.1 Interfaces for network functions + +The interfaces for network functions conform to [ITU-T Q.5001]. + +## 7.2 Data resources + +### 7.2.1 Water temperature + +Water temperature is an essential data attribute for growing fish. Table 7-1 shows information describing water-temperature data. + +**Table 7-1 – Water-temperature data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|-------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| water-temperature-value | NUMBER | water-temperature-value indicates the water temperature, measured by the water-temperature sensor. | +| water-temperature-units | STRING | water-temperature-units indicates a unit of water temperature value. The unit may be represented by C indicating Celsius, F indicating Fahrenheit or K indicating absolute water temperature. | +| water-temperature-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | water-temperature-range indicates effective range of water-temperature values. By specifying an effective range of water temperature, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | + +**Table 7-1 – Water-temperature data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| water-temperature-precision | NUMBER | water-temperature-precision indicates the precision of the temperature value. It can be used in conjunction with the water-temperature-range . For example, if the water-temperature-range of the water is (0, 10) and ' water-temperature-precision ' is 1, valid water temperature data can be expressed as an integer. | +| water-temperature-margin | NUMBER | water-temperature-margin indicates error range of water temperature value. It can be used in conjunction with ' water-temperature-range '. For example, if water-temperature-range is (0, 10) and the water-temperature-margin is 2, the range of valid measurements may be (-2, 12). | + +### 7.2.2 Dissolved oxygen + +Dissolved oxygen refers to the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. It is a crucial environmental factor that can lead to the mass mortality of cultured fish due to the phenomenon of oxygen deficiency. Table 7-2 shows information describing dissolved oxygen data. + +**Table 7-2 – Dissolved oxygen data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| dissolved-oxygen-value | NUMBER | dissolved-oxygen-value indicates the amount of oxygen dissolved in water as a value, and is measured by a dissolved oxygen sensor. | +| dissolved-oxygen-units | STRING | dissolved-oxygen-units means a unit that expresses the amount of oxygen dissolved in water as a value. The unit can be expressed as mg/L. | +| dissolved-oxygen-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | dissolved-oxygen-range indicates the effective range of the value of dissolved oxygen in water. By specifying a valid dissolved-oxygen range, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | + +**Table 7-2 – Dissolved oxygen data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| dissolved-oxygen-precision | NUMBER | dissolved-oxygen-precision indicates the precision of the value of the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. This can be used in conjunction with the dissolved-oxygen range . | +| dissolved-oxygen-margin | NUMBER | dissolved-oxygen-margin indicates the error range of the value of the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. This can be used in conjunction with the dissolved-oxygen-range . For example, if the dissolved-oxygen-range is (0, 10) and the dissolved-oxygen-margin is 2, the effective measurement range can be (-2, 12). | + +### 7.2.3 pH (potential of Hydrogen) + +pH is an index that indicates the amount of hydrogen ions present in water, serving as a measure to determine how acidic or basic the water is. Table 7-3 shows information describing pH data. + +**Table 7-3 – pH data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|--------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| pH-value | NUMBER | pH-value indicates the amount of hydrogen ions present in water as a value, and is measured by a pH sensor. | +| pH-units | STRING | pH-units means a unit representing the amount of hydrogen ions present in water as a value. Units can be expressed as pH. | +| pH-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | pH-range indicates the effective range of the amount of hydrogen ions present in water. By specifying valid pH ranges, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | +| pH-precision | NUMBER | pH-precision indicates the precision of the value of the amount of hydrogen ions present in water. This can be used in conjunction with ' pH-range '. For example, if ' pH-range ' is (0,14) and ' pH-precision ' is 1, valid pH data can be expressed as integers. | + +**Table 7-3 – pH data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|-----------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| pH-margin | NUMBER | pH-margin represents the error range of the value of the amount of hydrogen ions present in water. This can be used in conjunction with ' pH-range '. For example, if the ' pH-range ' is (0, 14) and the ' pH-margin ' is 2, then the effective measurement range can be (-2, 16). | + +### 7.2.4 Salinity + +Salinity refers to the amount of salt dissolved in water and is a crucial environmental factor that determines the reproduction, growth and geographical distribution of fish. Table 7-4 shows information describing salinity data. + +**Table 7-4 – Salinity data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|--------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| salinity-value | NUMBER | salinity-value indicates the concentration of total salts dissolved in water, and is measured by a salinity sensor. | +| salinity-units | STRING | salinity-units means a unit that expresses the concentration of total salts dissolved in water as a value. The unit can be expressed as psu (practical salinity unit). | +| salinity-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | salinity-range represents the effective range of values for concentrations of total salts dissolved in water. By specifying valid salinity ranges, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | +| salinity-precision | NUMBER | salinity-precision indicates the precision of the concentration value of total salts dissolved in water. This can be used in conjunction with ' salinity-range '. For example, if ' salinity-range ' is (0,10) and ' salinity-precision ' is 1, valid salinity data can be expressed as integers. | +| salinity-margin | NUMBER | salinity-margin represents the error range of the concentration value of total salts dissolved in water. This can be used in conjunction with ' salinity-range '. For example, if ' salinity-range ' is | + +**Table 7-4 – Salinity data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|---------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | (0, 10) and ' salinity margin ' is 2, then the effective measurement range could be (-2, 12). | + +### 7.2.5 Turbidity + +Turbidity is an index that indicates the degree to which water is cloudy or murky, determined by the presence of suspended particles in the water. Table 7-5 shows information describing turbidity data. + +**Table 7-5 – Turbidity data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| turbidity-value | NUMBER | turbidity-value is a quantitative expression of the degree of cloudiness of water, and is measured by a turbidity sensor. | +| turbidity-units | STRING | turbidity-units means a unit expressing the degree of cloudiness of water as a value. The unit may be represented by the nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU). | +| turbidity-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | turbidity-range represents the effective range of the cloudiness value of water. By specifying valid turbidity ranges, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | +| turbidity-precision | NUMBER | turbidity-precision represents the precision of the cloudiness value of water. This may be used in conjunction with ' turbidity-range '. For example, if ' turbidity-range ' is (0.0,10.0) and ' turbidity-precision ' is 0.1, valid turbidity data can be expressed as real numbers. | +| turbidity-margin | NUMBER | turbidity-margin represents the error range of the cloudiness value of water. This may be used in conjunction with ' turbidity-range '. For example, if ' turbidity-range ' is (0.0, 10.0) and ' turbidity-margin ' is 2.0, then the effective measurement range can be (-2.0, 12.0). | + +### 7.2.6 Flow rate + +Flow rate is defined as the volume of fluid passing through a specific point within a given period of time in water. This metric is essential for ensuring proper water quality and the health of aquatic + +organisms by monitoring and adjusting the movement and distribution of water. Table 7-6 shows information describing flow rate data. + +**Table 7-6 – Flow rate data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|---------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| flow-rate-value | NUMBER | flow-rate-value represents the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time, and is measured by a flow rate sensor. | +| flow-rate-units | STRING | flow-rate-units means a unit expressing the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time as a value. The unit can be expressed as m 3 /s. | +| flow-rate-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | flow-rate-range represents the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. By specifying valid flow rate ranges, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | +| flow-rate-precision | NUMBER | flow-rate-precision represents the precision of the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. This may be used in conjunction with 'flow-rate-range' . For example, if 'flow-rate-range' is (0.0,10.0) and 'flow-rate-precision' is 0.1, valid flow rate data can be expressed as real numbers. | +| flow-rate-margin | NUMBER | flow-rate-margin represents the error range of the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. This may be used in conjunction with 'flow-rate-range' . For example, if 'flow-rate-range' is (0.0, 10.0) and 'flow-rate-margin' is 2.0, then the effective measurement range can be (−2.0, 12.0). | + +### 7.2.7 Carbon dioxide + +Carbon dioxide can reduce the oxygen transport capacity to the cellular tissues of fish, potentially leading to respiratory distress in fish. Table 7-7 shows information describing carbon dioxide data. + +**Table 7-7 – Carbon dioxide data resource element** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|--------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| carbon-dioxide-value | NUMBER | carbon-dioxide-value indicates the concentration of carbon dioxide, measured by the carbon dioxide sensor. | +| carbon-dioxide-units | STRING | carbon-dioxide-units means a unit expressing the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time as a value. The unit can be expressed as ppm. | +| carbon-dioxide-range | NUMBER (MIN, MAX) | carbon-dioxide-range represents the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. By specifying valid flow rate ranges, unnecessary data collection and transmission can be avoided. | +| carbon-dioxide-precision | NUMBER | carbon-dioxide-precision represents the precision of the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. This may be used in conjunction with ' carbon-dioxide-range '. For example, if ' carbon-dioxide-range ' is (0.0, 10.0) and ' carbon-dioxide-precision ' is 0.1, valid carbon dioxide data can be expressed as real numbers. | +| carbon-dioxide-margin | NUMBER | carbon-dioxide-margin represents the error range of the volume of fluid passing through a specific point over a given period of time. This may be used in conjunction with ' carbon-dioxide-range '. For example, if ' carbon-dioxide-range ' is (0.0, 10.0) and ' carbon-dioxide-margin ' is 2.0, then the effective measurement range can be (-2.0, 12.0). | + +## 7.3 Interfaces for data processing + +This clause describes the APIs for data processing including creating, retrieving, updating, and deleting data to be used in the reference point Da specified in [ITU-T Q.5001]. In the body of HTTP request/response message, following notation is used for representing the requirements on the specific parameter.: + +- m: mandatory; +- o: optional; +- c: conditional, meaning that the use of the parameter depends on the context of the message usages. + +### 7.3.1 DataCreation + +DataCreation is used for posting data at the edge networking entity. Table 7-8 describes the syntax of the request message. + +**Table 7-8 – Request message syntax for DataCreation** + +| | | +|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Method | POST | +| HTTP URI | http://[address of edge networking entity]:[port]/[flowing-water smart aquaculture service]/[version]/[type of event]/c | +| BODY | "timestamp": NUMBER,
"device-id": STRING,
"data-id": NUMBER,
"data-type": STRING,
"data-value": DATA ELEMENT | + +- The *timestamp* field indicates the time when the value is measured. The time when the value measured by the device reaches the system is mainly utilized. +- The *device-id* field indicates identifiers of the sensor device that measures the value. It is possible to check which sensor the value was measured through the device identifier. That means the location of the value measured can be estimated. +- The *data-id* field indicates identifiers which is identifying each measurement value. +- The *data-type* field indicates what kinds of data, which are defined in clause 7.2. +- The *data-value* field indicates data element, which is defined in clauses 7.2.1 to 7.2.7, corresponding to *data-type*. + +Table 7-9 describes the syntax of the response for *DataCreation*. + +**Table 7-9 – Response message syntax for DataCreation** + +| | | +|---------------------------|-----------------| +| HTTP Response code | rsp_code | +| BODY | None | + +- The *rsp\_code* indicates the result of the request. If successful, this is 200, and it uses an appropriate HTTP response code if it fails. + +### 7.3.2 DataRetrieval + +DataRetrieval is used for retrieving data at the edge networking entity. Table 7-10 describes the syntax of the request message for obtaining entire data resources. + +**Table 7-10 – Request message syntax for DataRetrieval for getting entire data Resources** + +| | | +|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Method | GET | +| HTTP URI | http:// [address of edge networking entity]: [port] / [flowing-water smart aquaculture service] / [version] / [type of event] / r / [data-type] | +| PARAMETERS | "data-type": STRING | + +- The *data-type* field indicates what kinds of data, which are defined in clause 7.2. + +Table 7-11 describes the syntax of the response for *DataRetrieval* for obtaining a specific data resource. + +**Table 7-11 – Request message syntax for DataRetrieval for obtaining a specific data resource** + +| | | +|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Method | GET | +| HTTP URI | http:// [address of edge networking entity]: [port] / [flowing-water smart aquaculture service] / [version] / [type of event] / r / [data-type] / [device-id] | +| PARAMETERS | "device-id": STRING,
"data-type": STRING | + +- The *device-id* field indicates the identifiers of the sensor device that measures the data value. It is possible to check which sensor the data value was measured through using the device identifier. That means the location of the data value measured can be estimated. +- The *data-type* field indicates the kind of data, which is defined in clause 7.2. + +Table 7-12 describes the syntax of the response for *DataRetrieval*. + +**Table 7-12 – Response message syntax for DataRetrieval** + +| | | +|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Response code | rsp_code | +| BODY | "timestamp": NUMBER,
"device-id": STRING,
"data-id": NUMBER,
"data-type": STRING,
"data-value": DATA ELEMENT | + +- The *rsp\_code* indicates the result of the request. If successful, this is 200, and it uses an appropriate HTTP response code if it fails. +- The *timestamp* field indicates the time when the data value is measured. The time when the data value measured by the device reaches the system is mainly utilized. +- The *device-id* field indicates identifiers of the sensor device that measures data value. It is possible to check which sensor the data value was measured through using the device identifier. That means the location of the data value measured can be estimated. +- The *data-id* field indicates identifiers which is identifying each data value. +- The *data-type* field indicates of the type of data, which is defined in clause 7.2. + +- The *data-value* field indicates data element, which is defined in clauses 7.2.1 to 7.2.7, corresponding to the data-type. + +### 7.3.3 DataUpdate + +DataUpdate is used for updating data at the edge networking entity. Table 7-13 describes the syntax of the request message. + +NOTE – DataUpdate is only supported for configuration data, which is defined in clauses 7.2.1 to 7.2.7. + +**Table 7-13 – Request message syntax for DataUpdate** + +| | | +|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Method | PUT | +| HTTP URI | http://[address of edge networking entity]:[port]/[flowing-water smart aquaculture service]/[version]/[type of event]/u/[data-id] | +| PARAMETERS | "data-id": NUMBER | +| BODY | "timestamp": NUMBER,
"data-value": DATA ELEMENT | + +- The *data-id* field indicates identifiers which identify each data value. +- The *timestamp* field indicates the time when the data value is measured. The time when the data value measured by the device reaches the system is mainly utilized. +- The *data-value* field indicates data element, which is defined in clauses 7.2.1 to 7.2.7, corresponding to data-type. + +Table 7-14 describes the syntax of the response for *DataUpdate*. + +**Table 7-14 – Response message syntax for DataUpdate** + +| | | +|---------------------------|-----------------| +| HTTP Response code | rsp_code | +| BODY | None | + +- The *rsp\_code* indicates the result of the request. If successful, this is 200, and it uses an appropriate HTTP response code if it fails. + +### 7.3.4 DataDeletion + +DataDeletion is used for deleting data at the edge networking entity. Table 7-15 describes the syntax of the request message. + +**Table 7-15 – Request message syntax for DataDeletion** + +| | | +|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| HTTP Method | POST | +| HTTP URI | http://[address of edge networking entity]:[port]/[flowing-water smart aquaculture service]/[version]/[type of event]/d/[data-id] | +| BODY | "data-id": NUMBER | + +– The *data-id* field indicates the identifiers identifying each data value. + +Table 7-16 describes the syntax of the response for *DataDeletion*. + +**Table 7-16 – Response message syntax for DataDeletion** + +| | | +|---------------------------|-----------------| +| HTTP Response code | rsp_code | +| BODY | None | + +– The *rsp\_code* indicates the result of the request. If successful, this is 200, and it uses an appropriate HTTP response code if it fails. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-Fielding] Fielding, R. (2000), *Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures*, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1629394c02f697f60ae954ad36bf274fa8082cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3763acd7a0ed56aa30f3f90468c1fb0cb54573eb9045bca3eddf8976b4f0f41d +size 7219 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79f2e9de089547d6f36233dff0751510f118c165 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8df6024331039cd6ca087bb7fb250bf586f56b223aa06b18ab9fe130427febc9 +size 133372 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0e240e8e4783e664047fbdb5fbd0989f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0e240e8e4783e664047fbdb5fbd0989f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a63014d2c71deb3f0a74aa988e3bda73cff419f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/0e240e8e4783e664047fbdb5fbd0989f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b9fefc0d501d7592cedb51acdb7d99b431ca25deeeb2420a78b589d3d735d76b +size 17028 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/bf9297824aec2a021ecbad6f70536914_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/bf9297824aec2a021ecbad6f70536914_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b13919b4d6b1966bf2ad5900271c9abef0c8ec8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/bf9297824aec2a021ecbad6f70536914_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3e726f17c5b06d9bc25be6098938495e2c46d3358e22ab06ec52c9b16b342d37 +size 9369 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..247d8a5e8ef6e8ed64084e670134d37b7b92fbce --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.5037-202601-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,464 @@ + + +# Recommendation**ITU-T Q.5037 (01/2026)** + +SERIES Q: Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests + +Signalling requirements and protocols for IMT-2020 – +Protocols for IMT-2020 + +--- + +### **Data management interfaces in educational robot systems with intelligent edge computing** + +![ITU logo](0538daaa5583c23e17db3a12f2281a55_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue circular emblem with a stylized globe and the letters 'ITU' in white. + +ITU logo + +## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS NO. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120-Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM NO. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000-Q.3709 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR SDN | Q.3710-Q.3899 | +| TESTING SPECIFICATIONS | Q.3900-Q.4099 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS | Q.4100-Q.4139 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR COMPUTING POWER NETWORKS | Q.4140-Q.4159 | +| PROTOCOLS AND SIGNALLING FOR QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS | Q.4160-Q.4179 | +| ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED SIGNALLING, TESTING AND MONITORING | Q.4180-Q.4279 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5049 | +| Signalling requirements and architecture of IMT-2020 | Q.5000-Q.5019 | +| Protocols for IMT-2020 | Q.5020-Q.5049 | +| COMBATING COUNTERFEITING AND STOLEN ICT DEVICES | Q.5050-Q.5069 | + +For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations. + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.5037 + +# Data management interfaces in educational robot systems with intelligent edge computing + +## Summary + +Recommendation ITU-T Q.5037 defines data management interfaces for an intelligent edge computing-based educational robot system. The data management interface includes data resources and interfaces for data processing. Data resources can be used to decide what data are for. A large amount of data is needed to check the environment and growth status. The interfaces for data processing define a Bluetooth-based application programming interface (API) including data creation, retrieval, update and deletion. + +## History\* + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|--------------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T Q.5037 | 2026-01-13 | 11 | 11.1002/1000/16698 | + +## Keywords + +Data management, edge, education, robot. + +--- + +\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, and information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at . + +© ITU 2026 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 1 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 1 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 2 | +| 6 Overview..... | 2 | +| 7 Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based educational robot system..... | 3 | +| 7.1 Interfaces for network functions..... | 3 | +| 7.2 Data resources ..... | 3 | +| 7.3 Interfaces for data processing..... | 4 | +| Appendix I – Use cases of an educational robot system..... | 8 | +| I.1 Use case 1: Drawing robot ..... | 8 | +| I.2 Use case 2: Arduino-based cube robot ..... | 8 | +| I.3 Use case 3: Convergence system of virtual and physical cube robots ..... | 9 | +| I.4 Use case 4: Blockchain-based copyright verification service for educational robot content ..... | 10 | + + + +# Recommendation ITU-T Q.5037 + +## Data management interfaces in educational robot systems with intelligent edge computing + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation addresses data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based educational robot services, including the following: + +- overview of the intelligent edge computing-based educational robot system; +- data management interfaces for the intelligent edge computing-based educational robot system. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[[ITU-T Q.5001](#)] Recommendation ITU-T Q.5001 (2018), *Signalling requirements and architecture of intelligent edge computing*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +None. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +None. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|--------|-----------------------------------| +| API | Application Programming Interface | +| BLE | Bluetooth Low Energy | +| CRC | Cyclic Redundancy Check | +| FW | Firmware | +| I2C | Inter-Integrated Circuit | +| ID | Identifier | +| IEC | Intelligent Edge Computing | +| LED | Light-Emitting Diode | +| OpCode | Operation Code | +| RGB | Red Green Blue | + +| | | +|------|--------------------------------------------------| +| STEM | Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics | +| UART | Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitter | +| USB | Universal Serial Bus | + +# 5 Conventions + +None. + +# 6 Overview + +In education, research on physical computing using educational robot sensor boards is being actively conducted. It has been developed with the goal of improving students' logic and creativity as well as their cognitive abilities and is being used in convergence education. In particular, in the case of educational robots, it is an effective tool that can increase students' interest and solves problems through the process of manufacturing the structure that makes up the robot's body, the process of manufacturing electronic circuits, including controllers and sensors, and the programming process to control the robot. It is greatly helpful in improving students' abilities and cognitive skills. However, existing educational robots are composed of a controller that controls the robot, a sensor motor and blocks, frames and plates that connect them to create a structure, which is not only expensive but also difficult to access, so students can only use them for a limited time. In view of this need, the development of various educational robot standards through the development of widely available educational robots and the creation of programming structures to promote creativity can play a very important role in nurturing creative convergence talent. + +The intelligent edge computing (IEC) architecture defines a well-defined cloud infrastructure as a signal delivery architecture and reference point. Figure 6-1 shows the concept of an educational robot system based on IEC. + +This Recommendation defines a data management interface for IEC-based educational robot systems. + +![Diagram of an IEC-based educational robot system architecture showing a cloud layer at the top connected to multiple edge computing modules, each containing physical robot units (a and b) with sensor and actuator components.](07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture of an IEC-based educational robot system. At the top is a box labeled "Educational robot service cloud". Below it are three vertical columns representing different robot systems, labeled "Edge computing module #1", "Edge computing module #...", and "Edge computing module #n". Each column has a double-headed vertical arrow connecting the cloud to its respective edge module. Below each edge module is a box labeled "Physical robot #...-a" (where ... is 1, ..., or n). Inside this box are two sub-boxes: "Sensor units" (listing Gyro, proximity, button, etc.) and "Actuator units" (listing Buzzer, step motor, etc.). Below each "Physical robot #...-a" box is another double-headed vertical arrow labeled "Data relay". Below the "Data relay" is a box labeled "Physical robot #...-b" (where ... is 1, ..., or n). Inside this box are also two sub-boxes: "Sensor units" (listing Gyro, proximity, button, etc.) and "Actuator units" (listing Buzzer, step motor, etc.). + +Diagram of an IEC-based educational robot system architecture showing a cloud layer at the top connected to multiple edge computing modules, each containing physical robot units (a and b) with sensor and actuator components. + +Q.5037(26) + +Figure 6-1 – Concept of an IEC-based educational robot system + +# 7 Data management interfaces for intelligent edge computing-based educational robot system + +## 7.1 Interfaces for network functions + +The interfaces for network functions conform to [ITU-T Q.5001]. + +## 7.2 Data resources + +### 7.2.1 Cube robot static data + +Table 7-1 shows information describing the cube robot static data. + +**Table 7-1 – Cube robot static data** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|----------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| FW version info | STRING | Firmware release version information | +| Module ID | STRING | Unique ID of the module, including manufacturing date information. | +| Proximity sensor Reference | NUMBER | Reference value of the proximity sensor at factory initialization.
Range: 0~4096 | +| Gyroscope sensor Reference | NUMBER(X, Y, Z) | Reference X, Y, Z values of the gyro sensor at factory initialization
X: -1.0~1.0
Y: -1.0~1.0
Z: -1.0~1.0 | + +### 7.2.2 Cube robot dynamic data + +Table 7-2 shows information describing the cube robot dynamic data. + +**Table 7-2 – Cube robot dynamic data** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|---------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Module Group Number | NUMBER | Group number of the module in the Bluetooth network
Range: 1~76 | +| Module Color Number | NUMBER | Colour code used to distinguish modules
0: Red, 1: Green, 2: Blue,
3: Cyan, 4: Pink, 5: Yellow,
6: Violet, 7: Orange | +| SetScheduledSteps | NUMBER (StepRate, StepAngle, ServoAngle) | Array of angle command schedules for the module
StepRate: -100~100
StepAngle: 0~65535
ServoAngle: -90~90 | + +**Table 7-2 – Cube robot dynamic data** + +| Keyword | Type | Description | +|--------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SetScheduledPoints | NUMBER (StartPoint, EndPoint, Repeat) | Command array for partial playback: start, end, repeat count of schedule steps
StartPoint: 0~65535
EndPoint: 0~65535
Repeat: 0~255 | + +## 7.3 Interfaces for data processing + +This clause describes the application programming interfaces (APIs) for data processing, including creating, retrieving, updating, and deleting data to be used in the reference point Da specified in [ITU-T Q.5001]. The cube robot is a modular robotic system based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) 5.0. Multiple cube robot modules, each sharing an identical hardware architecture, can be interconnected to form various robotic configurations. Each module communicates wirelessly with a central computer in a star network topology. + +This Recommendation provides a technical specification for the cube-based robotic communication structure, data format and network control mechanisms. The system incorporates the concept of edge computing, enabling enhanced distributed control performance within the robot architecture. + +### 7.3.1 Cube robot communication protocol + +#### 7.3.1.1 Basic packet format + +Table 7-3 describes the basic packet format. The basic BLE communication packet structure of the cube robot serves as the foundation for all commands and data transmissions. To ensure clear identification and synchronization, the first 10 bytes of the packet have a fixed length. + +**Table 7-3 – Basic packet format** + +| Field name | Size (Byte) | Data format | Description | +|---------------|-------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| VirtualCubeId | 4 | Hex | BLE address or logical identifier of the cube robot. Automatically assigned upon connection. | +| AssignedId | 2 | Hex | Identifier used when a command contains a specific subtask. | +| OpCode | 1 | Hex | Operation code used to distinguish the type of command. Each function is assigned a unique value. | +| PacketSize | 2 | UInt16 | Total size of the packet, including header and data payload. | +| Property | 1~4 | Hex | Configuration options, including mode, method, step type, etc. | +| Data Payload | Variable | Byte array | Actual data values associated with the command. | +| CRC16 | 2 | Hex | Checksum used to verify the integrity of the packet. | + +#### 7.3.1.2 Cube robot network configuration process + +- After selecting the robot model on the computer, the system enters cube robot connection mode. +- The first cube robot that attempts to connect is designated as the primary cube and is configured to operate in multirole mode. +- At this stage, the primary cube activates its colour light-emitting diode (LED) to red. +- The primary cube connects additional cube robots according to the number required for the selected robot model. +- Each time a secondary cube is connected, the primary cube notifies the computer. The LED colours of the secondary cubes are activated in the order of connection: green, blue, cyan, magenta, yellow. +- Once all required cube robots are connected, the computer sends a signal to the primary cube indicating completion of the robot configuration, along with the command to start sensor data transmission. +- The primary cube sends the start sensor data transmission command to all connected secondary cubes, including itself. +- The primary cube aggregates its own sensor data and the data received from secondary cubes and periodically transmits it to the computer. + +#### 7.3.1.3 Robot operation data transmission and synchronization control + +- Upon entering the robot control interface, the system generates either full or individual operation data and transmits it to the primary cube. +- The primary cube stores its operation data in memory and separates and distributes the relevant data to each corresponding secondary cube. +- After all data is transmitted, time synchronization between the primary cube and secondary cubes is executed to enable coordinated actions. +- Once synchronization is complete, the computer sends a start signal to initiate operations. +- The primary cube and all connected secondary cubes perform the synchronized operations based on the received data. + +### 7.3.2 Detailed description of cube robot commands + +#### 7.3.2.1 Aggregator + +The primary cube serves as the central node in the cube network. This command group, specified in Table 7-4, includes instructions for managing the primary cube's operations based on the BLE multirole framework. It connects to surrounding cubes, assigns virtual identifiers (IDs), configures their sequence representation through LED indicators, and performs system-level tasks such as rebooting. These functions enable the coordination and control of the distributed cube network. + +**Table 7-4 – Aggregator** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| GetMultiroleVirtualCubeId | AB | Retrieves the virtual cube ID used in multirole configuration | +| GetMultiroleVirtualColor | AC | Retrieves the virtual colour value | +| SetMultiroleVirtualColor | AE | Sets the virtual colour value | +| ClearMultiroleVirtualColor | A0 | Clears the previously set virtual colour | +| RebootMultiroleAggregator | A8 | Reboots the cube robot operating in multirole mode | + +**Table 7-4 – Aggregator** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SetMultiroleInAction | AD | Configures the cube robot as a primary cube with multirole capability and assigns a group number if specified | + +#### 7.3.2.2 Arduino + +This command group, specified in Table 7-5, is defined to support the control and monitoring of cubes via external development boards such as Arduino and Microbit. When an external board is connected to a cube, this group of commands enables communication over BLE to manage the directly connected cube as well as nearby cubes within range. It facilitates interaction between external controllers and the cube mesh network, enabling real-time coordination and feedback. + +**Table 7-5 – Arduino** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|--------------------------------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ArduinoI2C | A2 | Communicates with Arduino using the inter-integrated circuit (I2C) protocol | +| ControlCubino/Arduino/Microbit | A3 | Controls Cubino, Arduino, or Microbit devices via the cube robot interface. | +| ControlLineBot | A4 | Controls a line tracer robot | + +#### 7.3.2.3 Flash and factory + +This command group, specified in Table 7-6, provides functionality for storing user-defined configuration values and system states in the internal flash memory of a cube. It also includes commands related to factory reset procedures. The group ensures that specified settings are retained across device reboots, enabling consistent system behaviour and recoverability in embedded environments. + +**Table 7-6 – Flash and factory** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|-----------------------------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| +| FlashDiscoveryGroupId | F9 | Stores the discovery group ID to cube robot flash memory | +| FlashDiscoveryFinishGroupId | FA | Stores the completed discovery group ID | +| FlashExternalPortState | F4 | Saves the state of external ports to flash memory | +| FlashCustomerServicePage | FC | Saves settings related to customer service pages | +| FactoryApplication | FD | Restores factory default or resets to initial configuration | + +#### 7.3.2.4 Query + +This command group, specified in Table 7-7, enables the retrieval of information from all cubes within the BLE-connected network. It is primarily used to read data from external ports, sensors and other hardware interfaces of each cube. Typical applications include system status monitoring, sensor data acquisition and inspection of connection-related metadata. The commands facilitate centralized observation of distributed device states within the network. + +**Table 7-7 – Query** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|----------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| GetProducts | B1 | Retrieves product information and model number of connected cube robots | +| GetPeripherals | BA | Returns the list of external devices (sensors, LEDs, etc.) connected to the cube robot | +| GetSensors | B8 | Retrieves current values of internal sensors such as gyroscope and proximity sensors | + +#### 7.3.2.5 Set + +This command group, specified in Table 7-8, is responsible for controlling hardware components of the cube, including motors, LEDs and buzzers. It also supports the configuration of motion schedules to execute predefined behaviours. Serving as the core interface for robot movement and action control, these commands enable precise and coordinated actuation within the cube system for various robotic applications. + +**Table 7-8 – Set** + +| Command | OpCode | Description | +|-----------------------|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SetContinuousSteps | CC | Configures continuous motor rotation commands | +| SetSingleSteps | C1 | Executes single-step motor rotation | +| SetAggregateSteps | CD | Controls multiple stepper motors simultaneously | +| SetScheduledSteps | CA | Sets time-based motor rotation schedules | +| SetScheduledPoints | CB | Configures point-based motor control scenarios | +| SetScheduledTimer | C2 | Sets the delay time between scheduled operations | +| SetPauseSteps | C0 | Pauses or resumes stepper motor operations | +| SetSingleServo | E1 | Commands the servo motor to move to a specific angle | +| SetScheduledServo | EA | Configures time-based servo motor movement schedules | +| SetColorLED | CE | Sets the colour of the cube robot LED | +| SetDigitalPort | CF | Sets the state of digital ports to control external circuits | +| SetWs2812bLED | C7 | Controls WS2812B red, green, blue (RGB) LED strips | +| SetPowerState | C9 | Controls the power state or sets the power-saving mode of the cube robot | +| SetInstantTorque | C6 | Applies immediate torque output to motors | +| SetUnpluggedInAction | E2 | Sets behaviour when power is disconnected | +| SetMusicNotesInAction | E8 | Configures melody playback on the cube robot | +| GenerateBuzzerTone | EF | Outputs a simple buzzer tone | + +# Appendix I + +## Use cases of an educational robot system + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +## I.1 Use case 1: Drawing robot + +This system, which is illustrated in Figure I.1, is designed for constructing and controlling an educational robot capable of drawing. It operates by connecting three cube robots via Bluetooth. Each cube robot is a modular device equipped with motors, sensors and LEDs, and is assigned distinct roles. The first cube robot, connected to the computer via universal serial bus (USB), is designated as the primary cube, indicated by a red LED. The other two cube robots are sequentially connected via Bluetooth and operate as secondary cubes, with green and blue LEDs representing their connection order. + +In this configuration, the two secondary cubes are equipped with motors and wheels and are responsible for vehicle movement. The remaining secondary cube controls the pen mechanism, allowing the robot to lower the pen for drawing and lift it for repositioning, enabling the creation of lines and shapes. + +Once the connection is complete, the primary cube transmits commands to all connected cubes to begin sensor data transmission. Each secondary cube periodically sends sensor data to the primary cube, which in turn forwards the compiled data to the computer. The computer analyses this data and sends corresponding control commands, enabling the robot to operate in real time or follow pre-programmed paths to draw. + +This educational robot system allows students – from elementary to high school levels – to understand fundamental concepts of robotic control and programming through hands-on experience. The Bluetooth-based primary-secondary structure also facilitates learning in areas such as sensor networks and distributed control systems. + +![A 3D rendering of a drawing robot. It consists of a central cube-shaped robot body with two large, circular, perforated wheels attached to its sides. A vertical pen holder is mounted on top of the cube, holding a pen. The robot is shown from a slightly elevated front-right perspective.](bf9297824aec2a021ecbad6f70536914_img.jpg) + +A 3D rendering of a drawing robot. It consists of a central cube-shaped robot body with two large, circular, perforated wheels attached to its sides. A vertical pen holder is mounted on top of the cube, holding a pen. The robot is shown from a slightly elevated front-right perspective. + +**Figure I.1 – Use case of a drawing robot** + +## I.2 Use case 2: Arduino-based cube robot + +This system integrates Arduino with cube robots to form an educational robotic platform utilizing BLE communication. Figure I.2 illustrates this use case. Each cube robot has identical hardware and supports BLE multirole functionality, enabling it to act as either as primary or secondary. When an Arduino is connected to a cube robot, it is automatically set as the primary cube. Other cube robots are linked wirelessly via BLE to form a complete robot system, allowing control without the need for a computer – making it highly suitable for classroom use. + +The system follows a specific process: When powered, the Arduino sends a 'Primary Start' command to the connected cube robot via a universal asynchronous receiver transmitter (UART). The cube then operates in multirole mode, functioning as both central and peripheral in BLE terms. The Arduino specifies the number of cube robots to be connected, and the primary cube scans and connects them sequentially. Each connected cube robot receives an assigned ID and a designated LED colour for visual identification. Once all required cube robots are connected, the system is ready for data transmission and control. + +Data flow is bidirectional: In the upstream direction, sensor cubes send data via BLE to the primary cube, which then relays it to the Arduino through UART. In the downstream direction, the Arduino sends control commands to the primary cube, which then distributes them to the appropriate secondary cubes. This continuous interaction enables real-time control and drawing tasks. + +The simplicity of the hardware and the intuitive communication structure enable students to learn key concepts in sensor communication, wireless networking, distributed control and physical robot operation. The system is particularly effective for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, requiring minimal programming skills to set up and control the robot. + +![A photograph of the Arduino-based cube robot. It is a black, cube-shaped device with a small screen on top and two circular sensors on the front. Wires are visible connecting the top part to the bottom part.](0e240e8e4783e664047fbdb5fbd0989f_img.jpg) + +A photograph of the Arduino-based cube robot. It is a black, cube-shaped device with a small screen on top and two circular sensors on the front. Wires are visible connecting the top part to the bottom part. + +**Figure I.2 – Use case of the Arduino-based cube robot** + +## **I.3 Use case 3: Convergence system of virtual and physical cube robots** + +This system presents a mixed reality-based robotic platform that integrates virtual and physical cube robots within a metaverse environment. It is suitable for applications in education, experimentation, and simulation. The virtual cube robot, implemented via a digital twin or web-based simulator, interacts seamlessly with the physical cube robot to form a unified interactive system. This convergence structure is especially valuable in environments with limited physical resources or safety constraints, as it allows safe and effective design and testing of robotic behaviours. Additionally, feedback from physical sensor data into the virtual environment creates a closed loop for comparing simulation and real-world performance, enabling iterative optimization. + +A representative use case is the design and execution of a maze-escaping robot. The scenario involves five stages: + +- Robot design using four virtual cube robots within a web simulator – no physical hardware required. +- Testing the sensor-based pathfinding algorithm in the virtual environment. +- Deploying the finalized design and algorithm to physical cube robots. +- Feeding real-world sensor and movement data back into the virtual simulator for analysis. +- Refining the design in the simulator and reapplying it to the physical robot – enabling continuous optimization. + +Data flow in this system is bidirectional. Users design and code in the virtual environment, then deploy to physical cube robots. Conversely, sensor outputs and movement results from physical robots are sent back to the simulator for debugging and refinement. This cyclic data exchange enables real-time validation and adjustment of robotic behaviour. + +This hybrid system offers broad applicability. In education, it enables complete robotic design and programming exercises even without access to hardware. In industrial testing, simulation can precede physical prototyping, reducing time and cost. In special education, learners with cognitive or physical challenges can safely practice control in a virtual setting before transitioning to real hardware. + +In conclusion, the convergence system of virtual and physical cube robots in a metaverse context extends the possibilities of robotic design, education and testing, overcoming the constraints of physical space and resources. + +## **I.4 Use case 4: Blockchain-based copyright verification service for educational robot content** + +Educational robot content presents more complex copyright exemption conditions than ordinary creative works, making it particularly challenging to determine what constitutes permissible use. Although national copyright laws include exceptions for educational purposes – such as reproduction, performance, transmission and quotation – their scope and conditions vary by country and often require nuanced interpretation. Against this background, this clause outlines the concept and design direction for a blockchain-based copyright verification system specifically tailored for educational content. + +This service is a blockchain-based copyright verification system dedicated to educational content. Its primary goals are objective and automated determination of copyright exceptions, utilization of collective intelligence for ambiguous interpretations, and transparent disclosure of all decision-making processes and results. The core design directions are as follows: + +- Chain code-based exception rule encoding: Educational copyright exceptions from different jurisdictions are formalized into rule languages and implemented as smart contracts. This enables the system to automatically assess whether a given content use request qualifies for an exception. By codifying criteria such as the proportion of use, non-profit status and educational purpose, the service ensures objectivity and automation in the decision process. +- Expert voting-based interpretation module: Since automatic determination alone cannot cover all ambiguous cases, uncertain situations are referred to an expert panel. Through a blockchain-based voting mechanism, experts collectively decide whether the use constitutes infringement or permissible use. The voting results are recorded on-chain, ensuring transparency and accountability. +- Blockchain storage of usage history and post-verification: All content usage requests, approvals or denials, actual usage records and activity logs are stored on the blockchain. This not only supports pre-authorization but also enables post-event verification. In cases of copyright disputes, these records can serve as evidence for enforcement by the copyright holder or affected party. + +By incorporating both ex-ante permission and ex-post verification tailored to the unique nature of educational content, this service offers greater applicability in educational contexts than conventional content management systems. Combining blockchain technology with expert governance to address the complex structure of educational copyright exceptions provides a predictable and transparent environment for both educators and copyright owners. Further work is needed to refine the cross-national exception rule models and to design robust expert governance mechanisms. + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.604-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.604-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31fc1fc2798375070e87409ba3ca5989b2557849 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.604-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:be8fc7613476751cb71176bd62aa88b879640389ef6af3464b78db8e5cf52118 +size 8279 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..197df0279e445d90abcfc215e251ebbb52bab25c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e5355c74e05fb562b150113ef4db5b8bc7bbe8ee2f8869c64aeecc71c0482495 +size 85764 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..795048031f0b71d040e2e8eec4eb265bd27bc9fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0b94b2f32930274972bcbd862b1453012aafc84e2a875bd3d0631b88117b558a +size 94020 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a72165d88379a9027fe5c15a9192928b36291e54 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:480e4409002530cfc3756cda6faa60b2f5f32fb5a89ee0bff338332a63ad9c12 +size 30697 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/a7d78d22e465dea388b31d0739f9d0cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/a7d78d22e465dea388b31d0739f9d0cd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b6ea0a1c97a4ed27e276ab860b23f342aef3baf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/a7d78d22e465dea388b31d0739f9d0cd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fc66772f525baacc59886f06a81828701e38359a0980c5b531b25b73f3dd21e1 +size 71339 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38c77e4026a9018f86cba472c8f22178c1055955 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.622-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a lightning bolt superimposed on it, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.622** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS** + +--- + +**LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR OUTGOING +SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 5** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.622** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +# NOTES + +- 1 ITU-T Recommendation Q.622 was published in Fascicle VI.6 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). +- 2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR OUTGOING SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 5 + +![State overview diagram for outgoing Signalling System No. 5. It shows a sequence of states from 00 to 10. State 00 is Idle, 01 is Wait for calling party's category (CPCI), 02 is Wait for country code indicator (CCI), 03 is Wait for ST, 04 is Wait for proceed-to-send, 05 is Wait for time release t3, 06 is Wait for time release t4, 07 is Wait for answer, 08 is Answered, 09 is Clear-back, and 10 is Wait for release-guard. Transitions are shown between consecutive states, with some states (00, 01, 02, 03, 04) having additional transitions to state 10. State 10 has a transition back to state 00. The diagram is labeled CCITT-48600.](7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg) + +State overview diagram for outgoing Signalling System No. 5. It shows a sequence of states from 00 to 10. State 00 is Idle, 01 is Wait for calling party's category (CPCI), 02 is Wait for country code indicator (CCI), 03 is Wait for ST, 04 is Wait for proceed-to-send, 05 is Wait for time release t3, 06 is Wait for time release t4, 07 is Wait for answer, 08 is Answered, 09 is Clear-back, and 10 is Wait for release-guard. Transitions are shown between consecutive states, with some states (00, 01, 02, 03, 04) having additional transitions to state 10. State 10 has a transition back to state 00. The diagram is labeled CCITT-48600. + +| State number | State description | Sheet reference | Timers running | +|--------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------| +| 00 | Idle | 1 | | +| 01 | Wait for calling party's category (CPCI) | 1 | | +| 02 | Wait for country code indicator (CCI) | 1 | | +| 03 | Wait for ST | 1 | t 1 | +| 04 | Wait for proceed-to-send | 1 | t 2 | +| 05 | Wait for time release t 3 | 2 | t 3 | +| 06 | Wait for time release t 4 | 2 | t 4 | +| 07 | Wait for answer | 3 | | +| 08 | Answered | 3 | | +| 09 | Clear-back | 3 | | +| 10 | Wait for release-guard | 3 | t 2 | + +FIGURE 1/Q.622 +State overview diagram for outgoing Signalling System No. 5 + +## Supervisory timers for outgoing Signalling System No. 5 + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| t 1 = 4-6 s | Recommendation Q.152, § 3.2.1, b) | +| t 2 = 10-20 s | Recommendation Q.141, § 2.1.3.1, e), i) | +| t 3 = (100 ± 10) + (55 ± 5) ms | Recommendation Q.153, § 3.3.3 | +| t 4 = 2 (55 ± 5) ms | Recommendation Q.153, § 3.3.3 | + +### Procedure not shown + +The following procedure, not directly relevant to interworking, is not shown in the logic procedures: + +P1 = Procedure for non-receipt of release-guard (Recommendation Q.141, § 2.1.3.1, e), i)). + +FIGURE 2/Q.622 + +## Notes to outgoing Signalling System No. 5 + +![Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5 (FIGURE 1/Q.622 Sheet 1 of 3).](2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg) + +The flowchart illustrates the logic for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5. It starts with a 'Start' terminal leading to a series of process blocks and decision diamonds. Key elements include: + +- Process blocks for sending signals (e.g., KP1, KP2, digits) and waiting for acknowledgments. +- Decision diamonds checking conditions like 'ST signal?', 'Note 1', and 'Note 2'. +- Input/output symbols for receiving and sending signals like 'Acknowledge', 'Proceed to send', and 'Busy flash'. +- Connectors labeled '1' and '2' at the bottom indicating transitions to other parts of the diagram. +- Various paths based on 'Yes' or 'No' outcomes from decision points. + +Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5 (FIGURE 1/Q.622 Sheet 1 of 3). + +Note 1 - Fixed or maximum number length reached? + +Note 2 - Has the minimum number of digits been received? + +FIGURE 1/Q.622 (Sheet 1 of 3) +**Outgoing Signalling System No. 5** + +Connector reference + +![Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5. The process starts with '1' (Connector reference) leading to a decision 'IS IT AN ISDN?' (1). If 'YES', it goes to 'Start' (2) and then to 'ISDN' (3). If 'NO', it goes to 'Start' (4) and then to 'ISDN' (5). From 'Start' (4), it goes to 'Language' (6) and then to 'Language' (7). From 'Start' (2), it goes to 'Start' (8) and then to 'ISDN' (9). From 'Start' (8), it goes to 'Start' (10) and then to 'ISDN' (11). From 'Start' (10), it goes to 'Start' (12) and then to 'ISDN' (13). From 'Start' (12), it goes to 'Start' (14) and then to 'ISDN' (15). From 'Start' (14), it goes to 'Start' (16) and then to 'ISDN' (17). From 'Start' (16), it goes to 'Start' (18) and then to 'ISDN' (19). From 'Start' (18), it goes to 'Start' (20) and then to 'ISDN' (21). From 'Start' (20), it goes to 'Start' (22) and then to 'ISDN' (23). From 'Start' (22), it goes to 'Start' (24) and then to 'ISDN' (25). From 'Start' (24), it goes to 'Start' (26) and then to 'ISDN' (27). From 'Start' (26), it goes to 'Start' (28) and then to 'ISDN' (29). From 'Start' (28), it goes to 'Start' (30) and then to 'ISDN' (31). From 'Start' (30), it goes to 'Start' (32) and then to 'ISDN' (33). From 'Start' (32), it goes to 'Start' (34) and then to 'ISDN' (35). From 'Start' (34), it goes to 'Start' (36) and then to 'ISDN' (37). From 'Start' (36), it goes to 'Start' (38) and then to 'ISDN' (39). From 'Start' (38), it goes to 'Start' (40) and then to 'ISDN' (41). From 'Start' (40), it goes to 'Start' (42) and then to 'ISDN' (43). From 'Start' (42), it goes to 'Start' (44) and then to 'ISDN' (45). From 'Start' (44), it goes to 'Start' (46) and then to 'ISDN' (47). From 'Start' (46), it goes to 'Start' (48) and then to 'ISDN' (49). From 'Start' (48), it goes to 'Start' (50) and then to 'ISDN' (51). From 'Start' (50), it goes to 'Start' (52) and then to 'ISDN' (53). From 'Start' (52), it goes to 'Start' (54) and then to 'ISDN' (55). From 'Start' (54), it goes to 'Start' (56) and then to 'ISDN' (57). From 'Start' (56), it goes to 'Start' (58) and then to 'ISDN' (59). From 'Start' (58), it goes to 'Start' (60) and then to 'ISDN' (61). From 'Start' (60), it goes to 'Start' (62) and then to 'ISDN' (63). From 'Start' (62), it goes to 'Start' (64) and then to 'ISDN' (65). From 'Start' (64), it goes to 'Start' (66) and then to 'ISDN' (67). From 'Start' (66), it goes to 'Start' (68) and then to 'ISDN' (69). From 'Start' (68), it goes to 'Start' (70) and then to 'ISDN' (71). From 'Start' (70), it goes to 'Start' (72) and then to 'ISDN' (73). From 'Start' (72), it goes to 'Start' (74) and then to 'ISDN' (75). From 'Start' (74), it goes to 'Start' (76) and then to 'ISDN' (77). From 'Start' (76), it goes to 'Start' (78) and then to 'ISDN' (79). From 'Start' (78), it goes to 'Start' (80) and then to 'ISDN' (81). From 'Start' (80), it goes to 'Start' (82) and then to 'ISDN' (83). From 'Start' (82), it goes to 'Start' (84) and then to 'ISDN' (85). From 'Start' (84), it goes to 'Start' (86) and then to 'ISDN' (87). From 'Start' (86), it goes to 'Start' (88) and then to 'ISDN' (89). From 'Start' (88), it goes to 'Start' (90) and then to 'ISDN' (91). From 'Start' (90), it goes to 'Start' (92) and then to 'ISDN' (93). From 'Start' (92), it goes to 'Start' (94) and then to 'ISDN' (95). From 'Start' (94), it goes to 'Start' (96) and then to 'ISDN' (97). From 'Start' (96), it goes to 'Start' (98) and then to 'ISDN' (99).](690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg) + +1 + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +26 + +27 + +28 + +29 + +30 + +31 + +32 + +33 + +34 + +35 + +36 + +37 + +38 + +39 + +40 + +41 + +42 + +43 + +44 + +45 + +46 + +47 + +48 + +49 + +50 + +51 + +52 + +53 + +54 + +55 + +56 + +57 + +58 + +59 + +60 + +61 + +62 + +63 + +64 + +65 + +66 + +67 + +68 + +69 + +70 + +71 + +72 + +73 + +74 + +75 + +76 + +77 + +78 + +79 + +80 + +81 + +82 + +83 + +84 + +85 + +86 + +87 + +88 + +89 + +90 + +91 + +92 + +93 + +94 + +95 + +96 + +97 + +98 + +99 + +CCITT 40960 + +Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5. The process starts with '1' (Connector reference) leading to a decision 'IS IT AN ISDN?' (1). If 'YES', it goes to 'Start' (2) and then to 'ISDN' (3). If 'NO', it goes to 'Start' (4) and then to 'ISDN' (5). From 'Start' (4), it goes to 'Language' (6) and then to 'Language' (7). From 'Start' (2), it goes to 'Start' (8) and then to 'ISDN' (9). From 'Start' (8), it goes to 'Start' (10) and then to 'ISDN' (11). From 'Start' (10), it goes to 'Start' (12) and then to 'ISDN' (13). From 'Start' (12), it goes to 'Start' (14) and then to 'ISDN' (15). From 'Start' (14), it goes to 'Start' (16) and then to 'ISDN' (17). From 'Start' (16), it goes to 'Start' (18) and then to 'ISDN' (19). From 'Start' (18), it goes to 'Start' (20) and then to 'ISDN' (21). From 'Start' (20), it goes to 'Start' (22) and then to 'ISDN' (23). From 'Start' (22), it goes to 'Start' (24) and then to 'ISDN' (25). From 'Start' (24), it goes to 'Start' (26) and then to 'ISDN' (27). From 'Start' (26), it goes to 'Start' (28) and then to 'ISDN' (29). From 'Start' (28), it goes to 'Start' (30) and then to 'ISDN' (31). From 'Start' (30), it goes to 'Start' (32) and then to 'ISDN' (33). From 'Start' (32), it goes to 'Start' (34) and then to 'ISDN' (35). From 'Start' (34), it goes to 'Start' (36) and then to 'ISDN' (37). From 'Start' (36), it goes to 'Start' (38) and then to 'ISDN' (39). From 'Start' (38), it goes to 'Start' (40) and then to 'ISDN' (41). From 'Start' (40), it goes to 'Start' (42) and then to 'ISDN' (43). From 'Start' (42), it goes to 'Start' (44) and then to 'ISDN' (45). From 'Start' (44), it goes to 'Start' (46) and then to 'ISDN' (47). From 'Start' (46), it goes to 'Start' (48) and then to 'ISDN' (49). From 'Start' (48), it goes to 'Start' (50) and then to 'ISDN' (51). From 'Start' (50), it goes to 'Start' (52) and then to 'ISDN' (53). From 'Start' (52), it goes to 'Start' (54) and then to 'ISDN' (55). From 'Start' (54), it goes to 'Start' (56) and then to 'ISDN' (57). From 'Start' (56), it goes to 'Start' (58) and then to 'ISDN' (59). From 'Start' (58), it goes to 'Start' (60) and then to 'ISDN' (61). From 'Start' (60), it goes to 'Start' (62) and then to 'ISDN' (63). From 'Start' (62), it goes to 'Start' (64) and then to 'ISDN' (65). From 'Start' (64), it goes to 'Start' (66) and then to 'ISDN' (67). From 'Start' (66), it goes to 'Start' (68) and then to 'ISDN' (69). From 'Start' (68), it goes to 'Start' (70) and then to 'ISDN' (71). From 'Start' (70), it goes to 'Start' (72) and then to 'ISDN' (73). From 'Start' (72), it goes to 'Start' (74) and then to 'ISDN' (75). From 'Start' (74), it goes to 'Start' (76) and then to 'ISDN' (77). From 'Start' (76), it goes to 'Start' (78) and then to 'ISDN' (79). From 'Start' (78), it goes to 'Start' (80) and then to 'ISDN' (81). From 'Start' (80), it goes to 'Start' (82) and then to 'ISDN' (83). From 'Start' (82), it goes to 'Start' (84) and then to 'ISDN' (85). From 'Start' (84), it goes to 'Start' (86) and then to 'ISDN' (87). From 'Start' (86), it goes to 'Start' (88) and then to 'ISDN' (89). From 'Start' (88), it goes to 'Start' (90) and then to 'ISDN' (91). From 'Start' (90), it goes to 'Start' (92) and then to 'ISDN' (93). From 'Start' (92), it goes to 'Start' (94) and then to 'ISDN' (95). From 'Start' (94), it goes to 'Start' (96) and then to 'ISDN' (97). From 'Start' (96), it goes to 'Start' (98) and then to 'ISDN' (99). + +FIGURE 1/Q.622/Sheet 2 of 3 +Outgoing Signalling System No. 5 + +![Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5, Sheet 3 of 3.](a7d78d22e465dea388b31d0739f9d0cd_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start((5)) --> WaitAnswer[Wait for answer] + WaitAnswer --> Answer{Answer} + Answer -- Answer --> Ack[Acknowledgement] + Answer -- BTS_A --> BTS_A[BTS A] + Ack --> BTS_B[BTS B] + BTS_A --> BTS_B + BTS_B --> C1((1)) + + C6((6)) --> C10((10)) + C10 --> Pendant([Pendant]) + Pendant --> DataLink{Data link} + DataLink -- BTS_B --> BTS_B2[BTS B] + DataLink -- BTS_C --> BTS_C[BTS C] + BTS_B2 --> C7((7)) + BTS_C --> C7 + + C7((7)) --> Ack2[Acknowledgement] + Ack2 --> Switch[Switch] + Switch --> C8((8)) + + C8((8)) --> LineFwd([Line forward]) + LineFwd --> C11((11)) + C11 --> Pendant2([Pendant]) + Pendant2 --> Switch2[Switch] + Switch2 --> C12((12)) + + C7((7)) --> LineFwd2([Line forward]) + LineFwd2 --> AccessG[Access gateway] + AccessG --> Switch3[Switch] + Switch3 --> C13((13)) + + C6((6)) --> C2((2)) + C2 --> WaitRelGuard[Wait for release guard] + WaitRelGuard --> RelGuard{Release guard} + RelGuard -- RelGuard --> Switch4[Switch] + RelGuard -- BTS_B --> BTS_B3[BTS B] + Switch4 --> C3((3)) + BTS_B3 --> C3 + C3 --> End(( )) + + RelGuard -- No receipt --> Proc[Procedure for non-receipt of release-guard] + +``` + +Flowchart for Outgoing Signalling System No. 5, Sheet 3 of 3. + +Figure 3/Q.622 (Sheet 3 of 3) +Outgoing Signalling System No. 5 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec927aa28872ab95f0a5b889515cd45616085677 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:32842e55f1f7e5fae5b4d9e35bbd3dbc54ce125577b374e28bcca57790328a04 +size 7513 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..87d0ba5e2b84e277c3ce64f7697cb041c36868d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:162e1bfdbbb81f943dfc94ec9d0d9f01aff6664d8d4001a5a42f0ec1bea4ffc9 +size 119998 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74308316c900e3d348d8b6d7c9dc7b0f18251f34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:43efd41ece0b13b432f4b214f0e1556238e455c24edd60ea27d089168fbe28a5 +size 105899 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfe9bbd7098c3bcd646fd0bbb9b583cb257fa5ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.625-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6d4f5fd6cbd2159aa83d70e973710bf736a3f537e894784c3a3778dacd66c42a +size 23291 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1416567f10717573e45ef525b6dfdc0fa51d4398 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a56759c53a627d2c02774687104e1d7154970327b1f18c40c9e1dc25b4d170ac +size 74383 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..200c0dcef9c60bb3fa6ba54e5b37df12e5818798 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0485dfca2075ba289eaaee50feedb6e90f33482312a6ef11b6cb9adc83fa2a70 +size 7452 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43f3f3aafdce91a7837f7e6e48496c43b2099e91 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:905277731cfa0b163fc4a426dac16699019a84523ce6491acd9f81549ebf706a +size 154566 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42ffd400a3a1aa27ac43cf485dbbae85f6595527 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e5a711c78240a5aec395b0273d47b05abe4b30c62f3b5563154f83d4c73473fb +size 33801 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff94a494611ab515791e06fc830d811dd61d36f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2253e7874f386a0cdc235bb76ccdc2c16cbc667f34521580d7e23c5cc5e3ae4b +size 42003 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9b0582d47ab2b5978d358af36a4a610641eca69 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.653-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fe0a983b840eba5a2637fd505a49d93a3a3585f34f43ad5d3271b689c1c5014b +size 53932 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8392ee861a64782d3e94b86367b4f1fee2e368a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/2fa4a1bf91d0f34e87c689fbc1211fe3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0814e9ebef61683b51df1ea49b89a14e9b076e4774b8eb4ee0709948c08d6add +size 157600 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..109ad9212921e132ea43b7967aa6401f69e9c9aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.654-198811-I_PDF-E/7055f51feb10ea4ea48b27c36f085286_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a3cce31ab66580a4fb6d91c6bb1d6aa9979658ca6f8e076df01d0252934aa954 +size 18008 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ab0a347caebfae0fbe23bb630d1d1468c941148 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:765e7f7be062ef469332a6c854cd164726f1944e65a785086957c00cb71b7f14 +size 631 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfcb6b924e097141cf0122fcb114252e72f20825 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c942335dbf5e6cb33a969396d1fd1f175c552e46ec341db9e15798be2b90ee12 +size 8229 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad74c7b03d479ea6a4f74169dc14d6c2ca67cfea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a83a783af96317a08a515f0e093e14dc530d2f5bf4a6cf96b29f8666c98e9252 +size 81594 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..457e278cdc4e55a4fa5742867080214d14e36073 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2749a12ab4121b45b2c3059917f109d31c94f5f037542f5eee06feba018b44b +size 113121 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9c9390d6559ad2f5d4e39755ea57a01bb989d6a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52b23094f6e77b068f06404444eef871c571c3b9f5e3d8d9e090c829a355500d +size 20854 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c0a124ff38c9421231098207dd7210085fcadae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:30b7a38e8dead6960e915129da89632f19df32dbc61a20cbe8455db59256026a +size 44217 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f6c7f4a322ab740e85c8d6cf4143b7393228f38 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cd690fd3052a8376e6a6c569c72a286ea3aa5f741f8df10dfce45436d672ce07 +size 56492 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8217b728b84294ef132fe7d6d52fe204bfa8741f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.667-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.667** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(03/93) + +# **INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS** --- + +**INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS – +LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING +OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (TUP) TO +SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (ISUP)** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.667** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +## FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.667 was prepared by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +## --- NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms "CCITT, CCIR or IFRB" or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## **INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS – LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (TUP) TO SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (ISUP)** + +(Helsinki, 1993) + +![State overview diagram showing states 00 through 07. States 00 to 06 are in a linear sequence. State 07 is connected from 06 and has a return arrow to 00. There are also return arrows from 03, 04, 05, and 06 to a common line above the states. A label T1141500-92/d01 is present near state 07.](69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg) + +``` + + graph LR + 00((00)) --> 01((01)) + 01 --> 02((02)) + 02 --> 03((03)) + 03 --> 04((04)) + 04 --> 05((05)) + 05 --> 06((06)) + 06 --> 07((07)) + 07 --> 00 + 03 --> TopLine[ ] + 04 --> TopLine + 05 --> TopLine + 06 --> TopLine + style TopLine fill:none,stroke:none + +``` + +State overview diagram showing states 00 through 07. States 00 to 06 are in a linear sequence. State 07 is connected from 06 and has a return arrow to 00. There are also return arrows from 03, 04, 05, and 06 to a common line above the states. A label T1141500-92/d01 is present near state 07. + +| State number | State description | Sheet reference | +|---------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------| +| 00 | Idle | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | +| 01 | Wait for service provided FITE | 1 | +| 02 | Wait for information FITE | 1 | +| 03 | Wait for continuity FITE | 1 | +| 04 | Wait for address-complete | 1 | +| 05 | Wait for answer | 3 | +| 06 | Answered | 3 | +| 07 | Wait for resume | 4 | + +FIGURE 1/Q.667 + +State overview diagram for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) + +FIGURE 2/Q.667 + +(Reserved for future notes) + +![SDL flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts at state '00 Idle', leading to an input 'Activate No. 7 (TUP)/No. 7 (ISUP)', then state '01 Wait for service provided FITE', followed by output 'FITE 30 service provided'. The flow then splits. One path goes to state '02 Wait for information FITES', then input 'FITEs 9-13, 17-19', then state '03 Wait for continuity FITES'. From here, it branches into four parallel inputs: 'FITE 25', 'FITE 26', 'FITE 27', and 'FITE 1'. 'FITE 1' leads to connector '1' and then to output 'FITE 22' and back to '00 Idle'. The other three ('FITE 25', 'FITE 26', 'FITE 27') converge into task 'SPITE 52', followed by input 'Activate outgoing SS No. 7 (ISUP)', then input 'FITE A (Table 1)'. This leads to connector '2' (labeled '2 (x 3)') and then to state '04 Wait for address complete', which ends at connector '3' (labeled '2').](2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Idle00([00 Idle]) --> ActTUP[/Activate No. 7
(TUP)/No. 7
(ISUP)/] + ActTUP --> Wait01([01 Wait for
service
provided FITE]) + Wait01 --> FITE30[/FITE 30
service
provided/] + FITE30 --> Wait02([02 Wait for
information
FITES]) + Wait02 --> FITEs913[/FITEs 9-13,
17-19/] + FITEs913 --> Conn1_top((1)) + Conn1_top --> Wait03([03 Wait for
continuity
FITES]) + Wait03 --> Branch{ } + Branch --> FITE25[/FITE 25/] + Branch --> FITE26[/FITE 26/] + Branch --> FITE27[/FITE 27/] + Branch --> FITE1[/FITE 1/] + FITE25 --> SPITE52[SPITE 52] + FITE26 --> SPITE52 + FITE27 --> SPITE52 + FITE1 --> Conn1_bot((1)) + Conn1_bot --> FITE22[/FITE 22/] + FITE22 --> Idle00_end([00 Idle]) + SPITE52 --> ActOut[/Activate
outgoing SS No. 7
(ISUP)/] + ActOut --> FITEA[/FITE A
(Table 1)/] + FITEA --> Conn2((2)) + Conn2 --> Wait04([04 Wait
for address
complete]) + Wait04 --> Conn3((3)) + +``` + +SDL flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts at state '00 Idle', leading to an input 'Activate No. 7 (TUP)/No. 7 (ISUP)', then state '01 Wait for service provided FITE', followed by output 'FITE 30 service provided'. The flow then splits. One path goes to state '02 Wait for information FITES', then input 'FITEs 9-13, 17-19', then state '03 Wait for continuity FITES'. From here, it branches into four parallel inputs: 'FITE 25', 'FITE 26', 'FITE 27', and 'FITE 1'. 'FITE 1' leads to connector '1' and then to output 'FITE 22' and back to '00 Idle'. The other three ('FITE 25', 'FITE 26', 'FITE 27') converge into task 'SPITE 52', followed by input 'Activate outgoing SS No. 7 (ISUP)', then input 'FITE A (Table 1)'. This leads to connector '2' (labeled '2 (x 3)') and then to state '04 Wait for address complete', which ends at connector '3' (labeled '2'). + +FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 1 of 5) +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +![Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP).](690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg) + +The flowchart illustrates the interworking process between Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) and Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). It starts at the top with a connector labeled '3' with a subscript '1'. The main horizontal line branches into several paths: + +- FITE 22** leads to **FITE Z**, which then leads to a dashed box labeled **(Note)**. From the note, the path leads to **BITE n**, which then leads to an **Idle** state (represented by a double circle with '00'). +- BITE Z** leads to **SPITE 53 (Table 5)**, which then leads to **BITE n**. +- FITE 1** leads to a decision diamond **Country Code FITE?**. + - If **No**, it leads to another decision diamond **SPITE 22?**. + - If **No**, it leads to **Omit Country Code FITE**. + - If **Yes**, it leads to **FITE 1**. + - If **Yes**, it leads to **BITE n**. +- BITE X** leads to **SPITE 53 (Table 2)**, which then leads to **BITE n**. +- BITE 48** leads to **SPITE 53 (Table 4)**, which then leads to **BITE j**. +- BITE 30** leads to **BITE 30**, which then leads to a connector labeled '2' with a subscript '1'. +- FITE 24** leads to **FITE 24**, which then leads to a connector labeled '2' with a subscript '1'. + +Further down the chart, the paths continue: + +- BITE n** (from FITE 1, BITE X, or Country Code FITE? Yes) leads to a connector labeled '4' with a subscript '3'. +- BITE j** (from BITE 48) leads to **BITE k**, which then leads to a connector labeled '5' with a subscript '3'. +- Omit Country Code FITE** (from SPITE 22? No) leads to a connector labeled '2' with a subscript '1'. + +Vertical axis labels on the left are 3, 2, 2, 4, 5, and 2. A text label 'T1125020-90/d03' is present on the right side. + +Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). + +NOTE – In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FITE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. + +FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 2 of 5) +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +![Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts at node 4 (2, 3) leading to state 05 'Wait for answer'. From 05, it branches into four paths: BITE Z, BITE Y, FITE 22, and FITE 23. BITE Z leads to SPITE 53 (Table 6) then BITE n then state 00 'Idle'. BITE Y leads to SPITE 53 (Table 3) then BITE n. FITE 22 leads to FITE Z (Note) then state 00 'Idle'. FITE 23 leads to FITE 23 then node 4 (3). From BITE n (Y path), a transition from node 5 (2, 4, 5) leads to state 06 'Answered', which then leads to node 6 (4). Vertical labels 4, 5, 4, 6 are on the left. A note 'T1141510-92/d04' is on the right.](547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + 4_23((4 +2, 3)) --> 05[05 +Wait for answer] + 05 --> BITE_Z[BITE Z] + 05 --> BITE_Y[BITE Y] + 05 --> FITE_22[FITE 22] + 05 --> FITE_23_1[FITE 23] + BITE_Z --> SPITE_53_6[SPITE 53 +(Table 6)] + SPITE_53_6 --> BITE_n_Z[BITE n] + BITE_n_Z --> 00_Idle_Z[00 +Idle] + BITE_Y --> SPITE_53_3[SPITE 53 +(Table 3)] + SPITE_53_3 --> BITE_n_Y[BITE n] + FITE_22 --> FITE_Z[FITE Z] + FITE_Z -.-> Note["(Note)"] + FITE_Z --> 00_Idle_22[00 +Idle] + FITE_23_1 --> FITE_23_2[FITE 23] + FITE_23_2 --> 4_3((4 +3)) + BITE_n_Y --> 06[06 +Answered] + 5_245((5 +2, 4, 5)) --> 06 + 06 --> 6_4((6 +4)) + +``` + +Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts at node 4 (2, 3) leading to state 05 'Wait for answer'. From 05, it branches into four paths: BITE Z, BITE Y, FITE 22, and FITE 23. BITE Z leads to SPITE 53 (Table 6) then BITE n then state 00 'Idle'. BITE Y leads to SPITE 53 (Table 3) then BITE n. FITE 22 leads to FITE Z (Note) then state 00 'Idle'. FITE 23 leads to FITE 23 then node 4 (3). From BITE n (Y path), a transition from node 5 (2, 4, 5) leads to state 06 'Answered', which then leads to node 6 (4). Vertical labels 4, 5, 4, 6 are on the left. A note 'T1141510-92/d04' is on the right. + +NOTE – In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FITE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. + +FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 3 of 5) +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +![Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) (sheet 4 of 5).](fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg) + +This flowchart illustrates the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) for sheet 4 of 5. It starts at a top junction point labeled with a circle containing '6' and subscript '3'. From this point, four parallel paths descend: + +- Path 1 (BITE Z):** Passes through a BITE Z block, then a SPITE 53 (Table 7) block, then a BITE n block, and finally reaches an 'Idle' state (00). +- Path 2 (FITE 23):** Passes through a FITE 23 block, then another FITE 23 block, and ends at a junction point labeled with a circle containing '5' and subscript '3'. +- Path 3 (FITE 22):** Passes through a FITE 22 block, then a FITE Z block (which has a '(Note)' label next to it), and reaches an 'Idle' state (00). +- Path 4 (BITE 25):** Passes through a BITE 25 block, then another BITE 25 block, then a 'Wait for resume' state (07) which has a junction point labeled with a circle containing '7' and subscript '5' next to it, and finally reaches a junction point labeled with a circle containing '8' and subscript '5'. + +Vertical axis labels on the left are 6, 7, 5, and 8. A document code 'T1125040-90/d05' is in the bottom right. + +Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) (sheet 4 of 5). + +NOTE – In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FITE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. + +FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 4 of 5) +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +![Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) (sheet 5 of 5).](997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg) + +This flowchart illustrates the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) for sheet 5 of 5. It starts at a top junction point labeled with a circle containing '8' and subscript '4'. From this point, four parallel paths descend: + +- Path 1 (FITE 22):** Passes through a FITE 22 block, then a FITE Z block (which has a '(Note)' label next to it), and reaches an 'Idle' state (00). +- Path 2 (FITE 23):** Passes through a FITE 23 block, then another FITE 23 block, and ends at a junction point labeled with a circle containing '7' and subscript '4'. +- Path 3 (BITE 24):** Passes through a BITE 24 block, then a BITE 24 block, and ends at a junction point labeled with a circle containing '5' and subscript '3'. +- Path 4 (BITE Z):** Passes through a BITE Z block and reaches an 'Idle' state (00). + +Vertical axis labels on the left are 8 and 7, 5. A document code 'T1141520-92/d06' is in the bottom right. + +Flowchart for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) (sheet 5 of 5). + +NOTE – In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FITE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. + +FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 5 of 5) +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +TABLE 1/Q.667 + +### **FITE A construction – Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +| Received FITE | CPC | +|---------------|-----| +| 9 | 1 | +| 10 | 2 | +| 11 | 3 | +| 12 | 4 | +| 13 | 5 | +| 17 | 10 | +| 18 | 11 | +| 19 | 12 | +| Pay phone | 15 | + +| Received FITE | SPITE 36 | CCH | +|---------------|----------|-----| +| 25 | Yes | 01 | +| 25 | No | 00 | +| 26 | Yes | 01 | +| 26 | No | 10 | +| 27 | Yes | 01 | +| 27 | No | 10 | + +| SPITE 22 | NAI | +|----------|-----| +| Yes | 100 | +| No | 011 | + +| SPITE 20 | SI | +|----------|----| +| Yes | 01 | +| No | 00 | + +| SPITE 21 | ECI | +|----------|-----| +| Yes | 1 | +| No | 0 | + +| FITE 30
Digital connectivity requested | TMR | +|-------------------------------------------|-----| +| No | 11 | +| Yes | 10 | + +| | | +|-----|---------------------------------| +| CPC | Calling party's category | +| CCH | Continuity check indicator | +| NAI | Nature of address indicator | +| SI | Satellite indicator | +| ECI | Echo control indicator | +| TMR | Transmission medium requirement | + +TABLE 2/Q.667 + +### **BITE X analysis – Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +| Received BITE X | | | BITE n to be sent | +|-----------------|----|-----|-------------------| +| CH | ST | CAT | | +| 00 | 00 | 00 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | +| 00 | 00 | 01 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | +| 00 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | +| 00 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | +| 00 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | +| 00 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | +| 01 | 00 | 00 | BITE 3 | +| 01 | 00 | 01 | BITE 3 | +| 01 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | +| 01 | 01 | 00 | BITE 6 | +| 01 | 01 | 01 | BITE 6 | +| 01 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | +| 10 | 00 | 00 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | +| 10 | 00 | 01 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | +| 10 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | +| 10 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | +| 10 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | +| 10 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | + +CH Charge indicator +ST Called party's status indicator +CAT Called party's category indicator + +TABLE 3/Q.667 + +### **BITE Y analysis – Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +| Received BITE Y
CH | BITE to be sent | +|-----------------------|-----------------| +| – | BITE 22 | +| 00 | BITE 22 | +| 01 | BITE 23 | +| 10 | BITE 22 | + +NOTE – With this proposal, BITE 22 (answer, charge) may be sent for a call where an address complete no charge message was previously sent. It is assumed that it does result in charging the call. + +TABLE 4/Q.667 + +### **CONNECT analysis – Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +| Received CONNECT fields | | | BITE J | BITE K | +|-------------------------|----|-----|------------------|---------| +| CH | ST | CAT | | | +| 00 | 00 | 00 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | BITE 22 | +| 00 | 00 | 01 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | BITE 22 | +| 00 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | BITE 22 | +| 00 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 | +| 00 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 | +| 00 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 22 | +| 01 | 00 | 00 | BITE 3 | BITE 23 | +| 01 | 00 | 01 | BITE 3 | BITE 23 | +| 01 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | BITE 23 | +| 01 | 01 | 00 | BITE 6 | BITE 23 | +| 01 | 01 | 01 | BITE 6 | BITE 23 | +| 01 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 23 | +| 10 | 00 | 00 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | BITE 22 | +| 10 | 00 | 01 | BITE 2 + BITE 27 | BITE 22 | +| 10 | 00 | 10 | BITE 4 | BITE 22 | +| 10 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 | +| 10 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 | +| 10 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 22 | + +NOTE – In this proposal, an answer, no charge BITE is generated when a no charge information is carried through the connect message. + +TABLE 5/Q.667 + +### **Received RELEASE analysis before ACM – Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)** + +| Received BITE Z
Cause | Sent BITE n | +|--------------------------|-------------| +| 42 | 9 | +| 34 | 10 | +| 28 | 14 | +| 31 | 15 | +| 17 | 16 | +| 27 | 17 | +| 31 | 19 | +| 44 | 20 | +| 88 | 35 | +| 65 | 36 | +| Other | 19 | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48304f808cdda943741a6a56f4eebfa58f3a54e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/191a4a245a7d36d03be9a990d0f758f5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f3cec5a2d9d73e6129175047e2fb9b55700dd66d499482a76999579b383a8fc3 +size 93424 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e5a0b4d1ce6b6e386233295daf8fb6c042bd9ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fdd52b5541e91aef4f80b20d56bc75c7185e0b4962adf1550423fa3fb1196837 +size 66207 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c0c73a6b1c1452b28bdb9ace3364ef8712b040d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:918856d707d44d2b6816333bd3ab17245b7ca6e7d7dcbf81a5f92a45078c43f8 +size 8203 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..046d6cb4facec34bd4dc4f001536f9cf2df46fd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d186dfb66ca30779de2011fd73cca9e95c60f77b5eb29c0b0fd93a5163864b57 +size 61393 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5fd7c06826491755d79b5dd267493e8818983884 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/690fce4fb5c9cbb8beb560cb2a3fcbeb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:26f43b94bdda6124b698377a591b7a0ba54daae460ef0a3aad9285666f9f0c0d +size 91207 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..387c5113502c47db6d6416db0a14b275f34e7c28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:109bb3f92db91d2db66bd6cd12badb4b79d6927536cd3ce41259007ae456a51d +size 17473 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0188a01dc0705568a3858b82fa22c5818ee0cbde --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.675-199303-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:763efb6afd85544a5fd8f8e4c133c5b69fac886b5c45ff6bcfbd871bf82ac3e0 +size 78327 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5877b230454e8c971a914403de502c05a95d86b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:955319972b0927b55edf60ee2838a6d43032a69dc7da085a6380c1262b5e1e71 +size 8272 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04eeb5ccc322ffd351ad7981a487af7c9dc8c84a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:06b98e6b4b99548c2798f6c55cbf1cbe4cb5f716f29ec434c2de30a198a2bed3 +size 91324 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e7a1c58d7535bd091155e9533ec8ec737a9f45e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b48c935d1ecca9ece5f547c1fb623271df19b631b8a53be29a010dbecf0ddb19 +size 51269 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1993bcb21d3a79bec04f4caf1f1097f77c55d4a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/69edc2887e907309499ac95b47ab6905_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4d24e9d50c6ea9a49986767d0a0f0e24b7e972006dc2a13561b9cd5e3938cb7d +size 20236 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef0c85946175ae7cf9be05b81314a7047f3f0ed3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:483aca11562a2bdaa90abf08d4a3a5e046addda478a694b1407a61d88d650282 +size 38418 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/f9a14fbfecbd7d059226cc93677d721b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/f9a14fbfecbd7d059226cc93677d721b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aad1aa730318aff9f258570fd6757264419deb37 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.690-199303-I_PDF-E/f9a14fbfecbd7d059226cc93677d721b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:de317a25b84116d9f43b1f80a823df1c5e7e40c5ba3ba7b84c010abf8762b03a +size 53972 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ec1f38e2f25f9c214d3a49b964ee17af8283984 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55db33e3e467718e8c3978d67cccce2da121c777a2e36f6ffa795359e4c34167 +size 91470 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95ccc58bd358ef06a1ed31dd44022ef1d0e07e20 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:245a49ff0b8e1035eee87b1974825f265cbfa9496229c0d0a4a1b658592bf15f +size 81435 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..637cf19f048a60ca6fbf309652c471a4f9695577 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:69f2b0636be5e417e60c526e31ec122024835fc7a41672e135b42e16e5448a96 +size 87928 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19d34fe4eb839e30764332e065b5577d11c5d279 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1c45afd8686f52cc90a5b40b31a5bd1bca6595ebcfe8b861f1f1510f01418941 +size 99803 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b9a1d7129abb2eaffa294d44062896495011330 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e7c6059bea77418d3d5ed5507124401080919f3420540dff86df3e0a85c88d5e +size 95449 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45b016dd12406ecf7a09d5969eef6bb881a519ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d3579ed4e2b09bb331039b5540e200ccd94cd3c9a5187e0e7e05bdd5bbaefc3f +size 100123 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2fd56c412107265037dcccbc5b3a53e7efdff13 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:916919c492b3fc6084b32dcfc0e658dfb84d5e6999bf565ab8c104950bc01bab +size 8276 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..681cd7c5f80db083287e77658d06da9a5bf4fa41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c1ffcb9811471e0fcb505a6b49466f2ad1826525e74029a3f624a1023f4bc916 +size 110369 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38017518db98600b1e7c0cc260b10b8e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38017518db98600b1e7c0cc260b10b8e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e702daa369fa61bb19801959b99919dbb399fe9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38017518db98600b1e7c0cc260b10b8e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f93e5db99a0e5650e18379c4f58cc339cee5026329975b95818a6f497069e644 +size 2361 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff0e571180dc7eb572c8d5173ad3d7449a7ede6a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ba2759f3f9fd60c0b39aa681d7e6ff9f404f592c1a9593f66b38d9c1e590ca5b +size 100353 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..096e47da6ba7929424105ffef80124e3e45fb3cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:59fc4e72f9ea038e0d5cadee044ad2461f0017812e23c8939932807e75571a21 +size 95156 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f36fe5b56770380d7e5a89ed35801955130b2c99 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0d028c3c940e262e0a49b773e821ad2ed309bac00a77c47586d7b2ca23df653b +size 107465 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..541773d09a5341a0f558a0e1df00bc80dfa21462 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5fd4659d7b5b5174746c2a26b1be370dd54c3aeba07a62971e03f9f2454c2815 +size 92420 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5815a1de455424f46d9697c89a99c6a9c81f8b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b9ff4d5bcd2f2c670dc4e593309208bb65b6226efb61e26f59ec4415f9f3a966 +size 98083 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1645d1162af299c6ad84b78a3b88bd3fd4631b96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d9cf3e77ecd3e62bc432dabf6b2aa6da87bb450dd068f358867fe4dd3e721132 +size 97246 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1155cc46c3579e502cf4cfbd6477d450d6fe4a1c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aec86dd13d3e0b8fe09ed99d46534b584c7850322bd7f21fd7eaff4a3d1838d8 +size 97225 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3faf029093b4769e73207470f180ae9b86274cea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e297d92efe30d416a381d20f8cdaa8eec74d27b84408b138f1c24a1ecf6ca8d9 +size 98149 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8f1da2ab3dcf3e97c1824a8eb45b437c442152d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:df7fd098e8dc19146bc5cc16cecb1d662bb401c2df1191999d95e8cb5df7c268 +size 82433 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be185d2ea7b8a1872e04c2d8e61f143b6ade0e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:299a787fe9fbe1279b73b047b7f4320c78d18c029e1415d3f2f90a3b9c6b2d5b +size 99503 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b3568a5e9ffbef33601bb849dcd38d8e23d447d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:89fa5b86faae530d15179a85b53df73f1777d535b7808dccb2b5e57b88fa32d9 +size 97768 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e31cbec59d7dc5db20970f6bb5dbf09abd8d0598 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b1baae632ba723e53bfefc58dda564c5eac53010d1923015ffb90fbfcb8db09a +size 104524 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53b6975cdb11f0cd37fbb3507f49f8f01e10b9d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:beb84543cfde0fb9f527557c60dabf997b4abb574a6f14ee5c87bb11bd3391e8 +size 97208 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7dbebae527c2b34eebcbf428997df6df_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7dbebae527c2b34eebcbf428997df6df_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ada0d6253591c30f1336306bc81490e6caa67ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/7dbebae527c2b34eebcbf428997df6df_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e01df237362487800756ab6e7538dd9d12085023c640168c30556f061fe1d71d +size 1549 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66942d69ff6b7452c57d8b49672ac4de69a60d0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:37ecbdede47d696093358213757491d8ec6e80b6041e9ab4f1d0f52c8086acc5 +size 80036 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9a5927586a691c4908aa2cf98bd47ebb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9a5927586a691c4908aa2cf98bd47ebb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9569870aa5ddbcfaa2f476f548093a5baf8f81cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9a5927586a691c4908aa2cf98bd47ebb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f1a7c3aed221e7f7f0ce1e1109244509288caf290b89a28cc6ac9ef7d46e4115 +size 103600 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b909fe78e9fc7fd5bc9bb3542ae15c3540db7820 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c8d493160cc4412ab5244c83a30a9f5d24a660259475e0131af9dc5444f5b52e +size 87478 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53b6dc4d45ed71a2b4fddf97e5315950eb3da300 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:862282398a44b456101b34c65bcdc05618d22d63def39882db3dda788031576f +size 108295 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..658cffd0217965c936ac21016d1d115d83d85214 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0f87873f61c23ee6e2b5df9c10deab4a4d1cfd709f3bcd0defe56efde293ef66 +size 81948 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e5d7a4d4916cb5b3dc518e86d32a3b586e254be --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7802aa667f6e1d59cc53d8573be3c787b3938cbdf648007f9e4297526c0f141d +size 101000 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aff2805978f0cc703b9552f98437368d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aff2805978f0cc703b9552f98437368d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21f61e65ad4f8811db66d7333a12edd67dd1f222 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/aff2805978f0cc703b9552f98437368d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4f73c439d4dfd68fb845fa30b9ef9f9870faa02a404ab091ac896545db2f4e66 +size 1950 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c4d4b5e7a9f291fd6f18e7fbb5be9bd106b3a4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f68e80c55b58e24956b5b712818b45dfd3d5364199ccc0a68e9fb238972d5973 +size 91364 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..746611a5c207615e94648dd75cb81bc93f6c28cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:45bb44b049b9cfdff9793f63470a832a479ffe7ef7628736188a3393834af7e7 +size 97477 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b32b0a76154b0313335b4b8316f388150967e9cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0cd00e80673dca59f1f1c4af8a80afa719dfa0ad9ceb75306e47115660cc422d +size 93364 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..485637ac5354b0db262ff513db55b38a20fd39e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b65d3295b6f72d1d4f71a007eb621d8b571bde10de90f6bd49c38c5812b455e1 +size 83397 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7115c3b252053ffe67d6855842e082ab722c2643 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:626f30a4e753cf55f249fa058c5b25c837019dbfb7637aac6c9c01b7601eb33f +size 96931 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c962b221acfbc5aaf4dfb821924fb166_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c962b221acfbc5aaf4dfb821924fb166_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be72547a79ed7e8cd135eb02b266e6daa1d9bc03 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/c962b221acfbc5aaf4dfb821924fb166_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:48e0e31ee494d3bc2495b454dc1a5094bbae22b3609472a1c581349672a983c4 +size 961 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..182b680bedcc69c597082e6d293cecc18f8b2ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5475ff201c4766fd416c4b50f65c9876e8b1bb355b0581f11ee5e37906feb095 +size 96693 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5cfd14260669ec53f2834aed11df5528f6026123 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aab52df367839ab74f1397395a48185402625346b61e31046a638571ea499672 +size 93133 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c7d97dff4937a4d58420feadf1042e706a88f13 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f8023be301aba329d3cb5a2074300b5f579eeec029c2fdec1800082f950853dc +size 105088 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4438e87b357ab11049d597fe8bb1c592bb5f1a04 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:63db79271a23301a6accdcc02cdc388dd9bd2ebdee9464ac5d28ea188aa8f806 +size 22666 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d793cf7c174b89eb024d132f00679787_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d793cf7c174b89eb024d132f00679787_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94f7299fd086cefa9d08799d3538e87afedc0fc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/d793cf7c174b89eb024d132f00679787_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bde60c68335848148ad2081db623fef148e8d8418952168a50eade3e50860781 +size 102000 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dacc236fc1e6f483932c083d3a20990d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dacc236fc1e6f483932c083d3a20990d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8aa8832d152b2de211425075e78f33bce6c20d4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dacc236fc1e6f483932c083d3a20990d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1249bdb801abd820fc6236428e56c4dc3017d6a002e15fc2e1675fe11404f88a +size 1571 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eff33f6a70c26c405c0e8bb142988a6ceeeab111 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8bf5d0726d7e28a1e2619a1ef84cbdd59e34a816059cabb7d78d5bd5f729d8f6 +size 91121 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a00eaa81a7ebf5eb1c171b68be4e2e92e8c13b92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bced6c8b704f64296088f3aeffbb8c697e98cea3f260312ea7f2baf5712f016c +size 80627 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..424e3000c35f72b79106a33faa3fe77961937a5f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dd6ed2aaa7ac9c99a278364fe3248ef88eac95b8eaa302624a73d4d128cafdc2 +size 98690 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d87cd4ceb719fdc4564f7f414b1b4b8de5c1ce01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a066a4ad1566bdfb5f7a19fa543030261ff4c1f9dfe88127c6563d106693ce1d +size 96404 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7f2f0159c9c60c33d2940678bcd185b4d0f8e27 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8cceb2875aecf1ef4ccb56800fdee10b3a400939993db751876f18b38c2cc394 +size 84777 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fddb9134812dc4c6b4ddaa150c4b8039760f2e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:728a1ce6d714a982b6f1ae16e87d7ce597f58896d8c5ce8112205ad6d52cf3ef +size 102154 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f31ca9429ded2551612db1871e31dbe2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f31ca9429ded2551612db1871e31dbe2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a4e8e5a2f5125ceb666d84bb2c6b99bbed6d5886 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f31ca9429ded2551612db1871e31dbe2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae4f5b0959087940b64c91accb337a412b9588624c7fb802a37e4cc6ed44ac64 +size 886 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86a3f83030e1c12af8a8b1f69c3267c8182ab4aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a0e4e6aa297ed516fa3ccc655820bfb94eebc11b4c618f5c6f4ff001c035b082 +size 80928 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09884e5379a35cb3aad66c7334df72f9a297a187 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9d89994343e7f319fb6a023726b55662b951d2737a05c498fe26742b18707281 +size 90717 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/fb41783a50215a0d15dff548f1a7f541_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/fb41783a50215a0d15dff548f1a7f541_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1661597b166cfbb70a510f5b7f8dea36428bc66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/fb41783a50215a0d15dff548f1a7f541_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:95d0f0f0517f36403a304596d2956d7b78a57a0e88e19e80c6b46ea186060bc2 +size 1301 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa0a696a6513a48c4bf66589bfeca95b944023b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.698-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1920 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.698** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(03/93) + +# **INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS** --- + +# **INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 ISUP, TUP AND SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 USING ARROW DIAGRAMS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.698** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.698 was prepared by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms "CCITT, CCIR or IFRB" or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 General ..... | 1 | +| 1.1 Introduction ..... | 1 | +| 1.2 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 1.3 Relationship to other Recommendations ..... | 1 | +| 2 Methodology ..... | 1 | +| 3 Interworking arrow diagrams for successful call set-up ..... | 1 | +| 3.1 Signalling System No. 6 to Signalling System No. 7 ISUP ..... | 1 | +| 3.2 ISUP to Signalling System No. 6 ..... | 2 | +| 3.3 Signalling System No. 7 TUP to ISUP ..... | 2 | +| 3.4 Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to TUP ..... | 3 | +| 4 Interworking arrow diagrams for unsuccessful call set-up ..... | 10 | +| 4.1 Signalling System No. 6 to ISUP ..... | 10 | +| 4.2 ISUP to Signalling System No. 6 ..... | 11 | +| 4.3 Signalling System No. 7 TUP to ISUP ..... | 12 | +| 4.4 Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to TUP ..... | 13 | + + + +# **INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 ISUP, TUP AND SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 USING ARROW DIAGRAMS** + +*(Helsinki, 1993)* + +# **1 General** + +## **1.1 Introduction** + +This Recommendation defines the use of arrow diagrams to provide a comprehensive view of the signalling handshake between ISDN-UP and other common channel signalling systems. The use of primitives as defined in Recommendation Q.699 is also included to gain a further level of understanding in an interworking situation. Detailed signalling interworking information still has to refer to the signalling procedures defined in respective Recommendations. + +## **1.2 Scope** + +This Recommendation provides arrow diagrams for basic calls in which ISDN-UP interworks with other common channel signalling systems. National options are not covered whereas supplementary services are for further study. Typical selective interworking cases are dealt with and references are made to relevant Recommendations. Mapping tables are used to cover interworking situations where there is no one to one correspondence between signals of different common channel signalling systems. + +## **1.3 Relationship to other Recommendations** + +References to other Recommendations are made to clarify the procedures in a number of interworking cases. The following Recommendations are referred to in this Recommendation: Q.118, Q.254-Q.268, Q.699, Q.722-Q.725, Q.762-Q.764. + +# **2 Methodology** + +The interworking model used in this Recommendation is essentially the same as defined in 2.2/Q.699. The use of primitives is also consistent with that interworking model. The symbols used in this Recommendation are described in Table 1. + +# **3 Interworking arrow diagrams for successful call set-up** + +## **3.1 Signalling System No. 6 to Signalling System No. 7 ISUP** + +### **3.1.1 Normal call with calling party disconnect** + +Figure 1 shows normal call set-up. When the calling party sends a CLF, the call is cleared. An REL message (Cause 16) is sent to the succeeding exchange indicating normal clearing. + +### **3.1.2 Normal call with called party disconnect** + +Figure 2 shows normal call set-up. When the called party hangs up, a CLB1 signal is sent to the preceding exchange indicating normal call clearing. + +TABLE 1/Q.698 + +#### **Symbols used** + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| An open circle symbol | Reservation of an incoming/outgoing circuit without through connection | +| A circle with an 'X' inside | Disconnection of path through the exchange | +| A circle divided into four quadrants, with the top-left and bottom-right quadrants filled black | Through connection of path in both directions | +| A simple 'X' symbol | Release of circuit | +| A vertical dashed curved line | Indicates I/C and O/G primitives are unconditionally related | +| A rectangular box containing a sine wave symbol above a circle with a diagonal arrow pointing up and right | Continuity check transceiver | +| A rectangular box containing the letter 'T' at the top, 'R' at the bottom, and a double-headed vertical arrow in between | Loop for continuity check | +| (CI) | Continuity check required in nature of connection indicators | +| (NI) | Network initiated in suspend/resume indicators | + +T114 1660-92/d01 + +## 3.2 ISUP to Signalling System No. 6 + +### 3.2.1 Normal call with calling party disconnect + +Figure 3 shows normal call set-up. When an REL message (Cause 16) is received from the preceding exchange, a CLF signal is sent to the succeeding exchange to indicate normal call clearing. + +### 3.2.2 Normal call with called party disconnect + +Figure 4 shows normal call set-up. When the called party hangs up, a CLB1 signal is received from the succeeding exchange. An SUS message is then sent to the preceding exchange to indicate normal call clearing. + +## 3.3 Signalling System No. 7 TUP to ISUP + +### 3.3.1 Normal call with calling party disconnect + +Figure 5 shows normal call set-up. When the calling party sends a CLF, the call is cleared. An REL message (Cause 16) is sent to the succeeding exchange indicating normal clearing. + +### 3.3.2 Normal call with called party disconnect + +Figure 6 shows normal call set-up. When the called party hangs up, a CLB signal is sent to the preceding exchange indicating normal call clearing. + +## 3.4 Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to TUP + +### 3.4.1 Normal call with calling party disconnect + +Figure 7 shows normal call set-up. When the calling party sends a Release Message (REL), the call is cleared. A CLF message is sent to the succeeding exchange indicating normal clearing. + +### 3.4.2 Normal call with called party disconnect + +Figure 8 shows normal call set-up. When the called party hangs up, an SUS signal is sent to the preceding exchange indicating normal call clearing. + +![Sequence diagram showing call flow between Preceding, Interworking, and Succeeding exchanges for a normal call with calling party disconnect.](d793cf7c174b89eb024d132f00679787_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a normal call with calling party disconnect between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP). The sequence is as follows: + +- Setup:** The Preceding exchange sends an IAM to the Interworking exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Setup Ind to the Incoming SS No. 6. The Interworking exchange sends a Setup Req to the Outgoing ISUP. The Outgoing ISUP sends an IAM (CI) to the Succeeding exchange. The Succeeding exchange sends a CCH Tone to the Outgoing ISUP. The Outgoing ISUP sends a COT to the Interworking exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Cot Ind to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- Answer:** The Succeeding exchange sends an ADC to the Outgoing ISUP. The Outgoing ISUP sends an ACM to the Interworking exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Proc Req to the Incoming SS No. 6. The Incoming SS No. 6 sends an ANC to the Preceding exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Setup Resp to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- Disconnect:** The Incoming SS No. 6 sends a CLF to the Preceding exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Rel Ind to the Incoming SS No. 6. The Interworking exchange sends a Rel Req to the Outgoing ISUP. The Outgoing ISUP sends a REL with Cause 16 to the Succeeding exchange. The Succeeding exchange sends a RLC to the Outgoing ISUP. The Outgoing ISUP sends a RLG to the Preceding exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a Rel Resp to the Incoming SS No. 6. The Interworking exchange sends a Rel Conf to the Outgoing ISUP. + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +Sequence diagram showing call flow between Preceding, Interworking, and Succeeding exchanges for a normal call with calling party disconnect. + +FIGURE 1/Q.698 +SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP +Normal call with calling party disconnect + +![Sequence diagram showing a call flow from a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) to an Interworking exchange and then to a Succeeding exchange (ISDN-UP). The diagram illustrates the exchange of signaling messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, ADC, ANC, CLB1, CLF, and RLG between the entities. The Interworking exchange contains a 'Call control' block with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X).](3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a normal call with called party disconnect between an SS No. 6 network and an ISDN-UP network via an Interworking exchange. + +- Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6):** + - Sends **IAM** to Incoming SS No. 6. + - Receives **CCH Tone** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **COT** to Incoming SS No. 6. + - Receives **ADC** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **ANC** to Incoming SS No. 6. + - Receives **CLB1** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **CLF** to Incoming SS No. 6. + - Receives **RLG** from Interworking exchange. +- Preceding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6):** + - Receives **Setup Ind** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **Cot Ind** to Interworking exchange. + - Receives **Proc Req** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **Setup Resp** to Interworking exchange. + - Receives **Rel Req** from Interworking exchange. + - Sends **Rel Ind** to Interworking exchange. + - Receives **Rel Resp** from Interworking exchange (marked with X). +- Interworking exchange (Call control):** + - Sends **Setup Req** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Sends **CCH Tone** to Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **Cot Req** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **Proc Ind** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Sends **Setup Conf** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **Rel Ind** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Sends **Rel Req** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **Rel Conf** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Internal symbols: T (Timer), R (Relay), X (Switch). +- Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP):** + - Receives **IAM (CI)** from Incoming ISUP. + - Receives **CCH Tone** from Incoming ISUP. + - Receives **COT** from Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **ACM** to Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **ANM** to Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **SUS (NI)** to Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **REL** to Incoming ISUP. + - Sends **Cause 16 RLC** to Incoming ISUP. +- Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP):** + - Sends **IAM (CI)** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Sends **CCH Tone** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Sends **COT** to Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **ACM** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **ANM** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **SUS (NI)** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **REL** from Outgoing ISUP. + - Receives **Cause 16 RLC** from Outgoing ISUP. + +Sequence diagram showing a call flow from a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) to an Interworking exchange and then to a Succeeding exchange (ISDN-UP). The diagram illustrates the exchange of signaling messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, ADC, ANC, CLB1, CLF, and RLG between the entities. The Interworking exchange contains a 'Call control' block with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X). + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +T1141680-92/d03 + +FIGURE 2/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Normal call with called party disconnect** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with calling party disconnect. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), Incoming ISUP, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing SS No. 6, and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6).](ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call flow for a normal call with calling party disconnect from an ISDN-UP network to an SS No. 6 network. The sequence of messages and internal primitives is as follows: + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** (primitive) to **Call control**. +- Call control** (represented by a circle symbol) sends **Setup Req** (primitive) to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- CCH Tone** is exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming SS No. 6**. The **Call control** shows a tone connection (T/R symbol). +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**, which sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **ADC** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**, which sends **Proc Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Req** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **ACM** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **ANC** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**, which sends **Setup Conf** to **Call control**. +- Call control** (now showing a quartered circle symbol) sends **Setup Resp** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **ANM** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **REL** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **Rel Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** (now showing a circle with an X symbol) sends **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Cause 16** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **CLF** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **RLG** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**, which sends **Rel Conf** to **Call control**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **RLC** to **Outgoing ISUP**, and **Rel Resp** to **Call control**. + +T1141690-92/d04 + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with calling party disconnect. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), Incoming ISUP, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing SS No. 6, and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6). + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +FIGURE 3/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Normal call with calling party disconnect** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a disconnect at the called party. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows messages like IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, Proc Req, ANM, Setup Resp, SUS (NI), Rel Req, REL, Cause 16 RLC, and various responses and confirmations between the exchanges and the call control unit.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a normal call with a disconnect at the called party, transitioning from ISDN-UP to SS No. 6. The lifelines are: + + +- Preceding exchange:** Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP. +- Interworking exchange:** Call control unit containing a timer (T), a relay (R), and a switch symbol. +- Succeeding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 6 and Incoming SS No. 6. + + The sequence of messages is as follows: + + +- The Outgoing ISUP sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Setup Ind** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Setup Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an **IAM** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- Both the Incoming ISUP and Incoming SS No. 6 send a **CCH Tone** to the Call control. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends a **COT** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Cot Ind** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Cot Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **COT** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends an **ACM** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Proc Req** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Proc Ind** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an **ADC** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends an **ANM** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Setup Resp** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Setup Conf** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an **ANC** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends a **SUS (NI)** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Rel Req** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Ind** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **CLB1** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends a **REL** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Rel** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **CLF** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing ISUP sends a **Cause 16 RLC** to the Incoming ISUP. +- The Incoming ISUP sends a **Rel** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Conf** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **RLG** to the Incoming SS No. 6. +- Finally, the Incoming ISUP sends a **Resp** to the Call control, which is marked with an 'X'. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a disconnect at the called party. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows messages like IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, Proc Req, ANM, Setup Resp, SUS (NI), Rel Req, REL, Cause 16 RLC, and various responses and confirmations between the exchanges and the call control unit. + +T1141700-92/d05 + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing by calling party before $T_6$ expires [2.5.1.3 c)/Q.767]. + +FIGURE 4/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Normal call with called party disconnect** + +![Sequence diagram showing a normal call with calling party disconnect between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange with Call control. The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages like IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, ANC, CLF, and RLG, as well as internal call control operations.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a normal call with calling party disconnect between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange with Call control. + +**Participants:** + +- Preceding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP +- Interworking exchange:** Call control (containing Transceiver (T/R), Switch, and Multiplexer (X) symbols) +- Succeeding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP, Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP + +**Sequence of Events:** + +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **Setup Ind** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Setup Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- Wavy lines representing **CCH Tone** are exchanged between the TUP/ISUP and the Call control. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **COT** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Cot Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **COT** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends an **ACM** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Proc Req** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **ANC** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Setup** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends an **ANM** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **CLF** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Rel** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **REL** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends an **RLG** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Rel** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **Cause 16** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **Resp** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Conf** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **RLC** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. + +Sequence diagram showing a normal call with calling party disconnect between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange with Call control. The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages like IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, ANC, CLF, and RLG, as well as internal call control operations. + +T1141710-92/d06 + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +FIGURE 5/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Normal call with calling party disconnect** + +![](d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg) + +``` + + sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP) + participant IE as Interworking exchange (Call control) + participant SE as Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP) + + PE->>IE: IAM (CI) + Note over IE: Setup Ind + IE->>SE: Setup Req + SE->>IE: IAM (CI) + + PE-->>IE: CCH Tone (wavy) + Note over IE: T/R Signal + IE-->>SE: CCH Tone (wavy) + + PE->>IE: COT + Note over IE: Cot Ind + IE->>SE: Cot Req + SE->>IE: COT + + IE->>PE: ACM + Note over IE: Proc Req + SE->>IE: ACM + Note over IE: Proc Ind + + IE->>PE: ANC + Note over IE: Setup Resp + SE->>IE: ANM + Note over IE: Setup Conf + + IE->>PE: CLB + Note over IE: Rel Req + SE->>IE: SUS (NI) + Note over IE: Rel Ind + + IE->>PE: CLF + Note over IE: Rel Ind + IE->>SE: REL + Note over IE: Rel Req + + PE->>IE: RLG + Note over IE: Rel Resp + SE->>IE: RLC + Note over IE: Rel Conf + +``` + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +T1141720-92/d07 + +FIGURE 6/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP + Normal call with called party disconnect** + +8 Recommendation Q.698 (03/93) + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP for a normal call with calling party disconnect. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages includes IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, IAM, CCH Tone, Cot Ind, Cot Req, Cot, ACM, Proc Req, Proc Ind, ANM, Setup Resp, Setup Conf, REL, Rel, CLF, Cause 16, Rel, RLC, and RLG. The diagram also includes symbols for timers (T, R) and call state transitions (circles with X).](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call flow for a normal call with calling party disconnect between an ISUP network and a TUP network. The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between the ISUP and TUP networks via the **Call control**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **ACM** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Proc Req** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **ANM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **ANM** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Resp** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **REL** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Rel** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **CLF** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **Cause 16** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Rel** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **RLC** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Resp** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **RLG** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP for a normal call with calling party disconnect. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages includes IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, IAM, CCH Tone, Cot Ind, Cot Req, Cot, ACM, Proc Req, Proc Ind, ANM, Setup Resp, Setup Conf, REL, Rel, CLF, Cause 16, Rel, RLC, and RLG. The diagram also includes symbols for timers (T, R) and call state transitions (circles with X). + +T1141730-92/d08 + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing. + +FIGURE 7/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Normal call with calling party disconnect** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP for a normal call with calling party disconnect.](4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP) + participant IE_IN as Interworking exchange (Incoming ISUP) + participant IE_CC as Interworking exchange (Call control) + participant IE_OUT as Interworking exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP) + participant SE as Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 TUP) + + PE->>IE_IN: IAM (CI) + IE_IN-->>IE_CC: Setup Ind + IE_CC-->>IE_OUT: Setup Req + IE_OUT->>SE: IAM + + Note over PE, SE: CCH Tone (bi-directional wavy lines) + + PE->>IE_IN: COT + IE_IN-->>IE_CC: Cot Ind + IE_CC-->>IE_OUT: Cot Req + IE_OUT->>SE: COT + + SE->>IE_OUT: ACM + IE_OUT-->>IE_CC: Proc Ind + IE_CC-->>IE_IN: Proc Req + IE_IN->>PE: ACM + + SE->>IE_OUT: ANM + IE_OUT-->>IE_CC: Setup Conf + IE_CC-->>IE_IN: Setup Resp + IE_IN->>PE: ANM + + PE->>IE_IN: SUS (NI) + IE_IN-->>IE_CC: Rel Req + IE_CC-->>IE_OUT: Rel Ind + IE_OUT->>SE: CBK + + PE->>IE_IN: REL + IE_IN-->>IE_CC: Rel Ind + IE_CC-->>IE_OUT: Rel Req + IE_OUT->>SE: CLF + + SE->>IE_OUT: RLG + IE_OUT-->>IE_CC: Rel Conf + IE_CC-->>IE_IN: Rel Resp + IE_IN->>PE: Cause 16 RLC + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP for a normal call with calling party disconnect. + +NOTE – Cause 16 = Normal clearing by called party before $T_6$ expires (2.5.1.3. c)/Q.767. + +T1141740-92/d09 + +FIGURE 8/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Normal call with calling party disconnect** + +# 4 Interworking arrow diagrams for unsuccessful call set-up + +## 4.1 Signalling System No. 6 to ISUP + +### 4.1.1 Continuity failure on an incoming No. 6 circuit + +Figure 9 shows the check-tone not being looped within its timeout period of two seconds. A BLO signal is issued by the preceding exchange. After the reception of a BLA signal, the CLF/RLG sequence is exchanged. On the outgoing side, an REL message (Cause 127) is sent to the succeeding exchange. The RLC message completes the release sequence. A repeat attempt is made on another circuit by the preceding exchange. + +### **4.1.2 Continuity failure on an outgoing ISDN-UP circuit** + +Figure 10 shows the failure to receive the continuity check-tone from the succeeding exchange within its timeout period of two seconds. A COT (failure) message is sent to the succeeding exchange. A repeat attempt will be made on another circuit and it is assumed that the repeat attempt also fails. In such a case of double failure, a CFL (call failure) signal is sent to the preceding exchange. On the incoming side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.1.3 Release signal received before address complete** + +Figure 11 shows the REL message received from the succeeding exchange. The cause value in the message will determine which CCITT No. 6 signal will be sent to the preceding exchange. The mapping table in the same figure shows this information. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.1.4 Timeout on address complete message** + +Figure 12 shows the failure to receive an ACM signal within its 20-30 second timeout. A REL message (Cause 31) is sent to the succeeding exchange indicating the failure condition. On the incoming side, a CFL (call failure) signal is sent to the preceding exchange. Then, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.1.5 Timeout on answer message** + +Figure 13 shows the failure to receive an ANM message within its 1.5-3 minute timeout. After the timeout period, the call is cleared in both directions. A call failure message (CFL) is sent to the preceding exchange and the REL message (Cause 19) is sent to the succeeding exchange. An RLC message is then returned by the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, RLG signal is returned on receipt of CLF signal. + +### **4.1.6 Reset circuit received before ACM** + +Figure 14 shows the RSC signal received before the succeeding exchange sends back the ACM message. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange and a repeat attempt is made on another circuit. + +### **4.1.7 Reset circuit received after ACM** + +Figure 15 shows the RSC message received after the succeeding exchange sends back the ACM message. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, a CFL signal is sent to the preceding exchange. Then, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.1.8 Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +Figure 16 shows the IAM message received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM message is ignored and call set-up continues as if it were a normal call. + +### **4.1.9 Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** + +Figure 17 shows the IAM message received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM message is processed as a normal call. The non-controlling exchange backs off and attempts to set up a call on other circuits of the same or an alternate route. + +## **4.2 ISUP to Signalling System No. 6** + +### **4.2.1 Continuity failure on an incoming ISUP circuit** + +Figure 18 shows the check-tone timing out after its two second timeout period. The preceding exchange issues a COT (failure) message. On the outgoing side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.2.2 Continuity failure on an outgoing No. 6 circuit** + +Figure 19 shows the failure to receive the continuity check-tone from the succeeding exchange within its two second timeout. A BLO signal is sent to the succeeding exchange. When a BLA signal is received, the CLF/RLG sequence is exchanged. A repeat attempt is made on another circuit and it is assumed that the reattempt also fails. In such a case of double continuity failure an REL message (Cause 127) is sent to the preceding exchange. An RLC message completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.2.3 Congestion signal received after address complete** + +Figure 20 shows the CGC signal received after ADC signal. On the incoming side an REL message (Cause value 34) is sent to the preceding exchange indicating the congestion condition. An RLC message completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.2.4 Timeout on address complete message** + +Figure 21 shows the failure to receive an ADC signal within its 20-30 second timeout. An CLF is sent to the succeeding exchange to clear the call. An RLG is then returned by the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side an REL message (Cause 127) is sent to the preceding exchange to indicate the failure. An RLC message is returned by the preceding exchange to complete the signalling sequence. + +### **4.2.5 Timeout on answer message** + +Figure 22 shows the failure to receive an ANC message within its 1.5-3 minute timeout. After the timeout period, an REL message (Cause 19) is sent to the preceding exchange and an RLC message is received by the interworking transit to complete the signalling sequence. In parallel, a CLF is sent towards the succeeding exchange. + +### **4.2.6 Reset circuit received before ADC** + +Figure 23 shows the RSC signal received before the ADC signal is sent back by the succeeding exchange. A CLF signal is sent to the succeeding exchange. After an RLG signal is received, a repeat attempt is made on another circuit. + +### **4.2.7 Reset circuit received after ADC** + +Figure 24 shows the RSC signal received after the succeeding exchange sends back the ADC signal. A CLF/RLG sequence is exchanged. On the incoming side, an REL message (Cause 31) is sent to the preceding exchange. An RLC message received from the preceding exchange completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.2.8 Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +Figure 25 shows an IAM signal received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM signal is ignored and call set-up continues as if it were a normal call. + +### **4.2.9 Reset circuit (non-controlling exchange)** + +Figure 26 shows an IAM signal received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM signal is processed as a normal call. The non-controlling exchange backs off and attempts to set up a call on other circuits of the same or an alternate route. + +## **4.3 Signalling System No. 7 TUP to ISUP** + +### **4.3.1 Continuity failure on an incoming Signalling System No. 7 TUP circuit** + +Figure 27 shows the check-tone not being looped within its timeout period of two seconds. On the outgoing side, an REL message (Cause 31) is sent to the succeeding exchange. The RLC message completes the release sequence. A repeat attempt is made on another circuit by the preceding exchange. On the incoming side, a CCF message is received. + +### **4.3.2 Continuity failure on an outgoing ISDN-UP circuit** + +Figure 28 shows the failure to receive the continuity check-tone from the succeeding exchange within its timeout period of two seconds. A COT (failure) message is sent to the succeeding exchange. A repeat attempt will be made on another circuit and it is assumed that the repeat attempt also fails. In such a case of double failure, a CFL (call failure) signal is sent to the preceding exchange. On the incoming side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.3.3 Release signal received before address complete** + +Figure 29 shows the REL message received from the succeeding exchange. The cause value in the message will determine which Signalling System No. 7 TUP message will be sent to the preceding exchange. The mapping table in the same figure shows this information. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.3.4 Timeout on address complete message** + +Figure 30 shows the failure to receive an ACM signal within its 20-30 second timeout. An REL message (Cause 31) is sent to the succeeding exchange indicating the failure condition. On the incoming side, a CFL (call failure) signal is sent to the preceding exchange. Then, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.3.5 Timeout on answer message** + +Figure 31 shows the failure to receive an ANM message within its 1.5-3 minute timeout. After the timeout period the call is cleared in both directions. A call failure message (CFL) is sent to the preceding exchange and the REL message (Cause 19) is sent to the succeeding exchange. An RLC message is then returned by the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, RLG signal is returned on receipt of CLF signal. + +### **4.3.6 Reset circuit received before ACM** + +Figure 32 shows the RSC signal received before the succeeding exchange sends back the ACM message. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange and a repeat attempt is made on another circuit. + +### **4.3.7 Reset circuit received after ACM** + +Figure 33 shows the RSC message received after the succeeding exchange sends back the ACM message. An RLC message is sent to the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side, a CFL signal is sent to the preceding exchange. Then, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.3.8 Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +Figure 34 shows the IAM message received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM message is ignored and call set-up continues as if it were a normal call. + +### **4.3.9 Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** + +Figure 35 shows the IAM message received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM message is processed as a normal call. The non-controlling exchange backs off and attempts to set up a call on other circuits of the same or an alternate route. + +## **4.4 Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to TUP** + +### **4.4.1 Continuity failure on incoming ISUP circuit** + +Figure 36 shows the check-tone timing out after its two second timeout period. The preceding exchange issues a COT (failure) message. On the outgoing side, a CLF/RLG sequence completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.4.2 Continuity failure on an outgoing No. 7 TUP circuit** + +Figure 37 shows the failure to receive the continuity check-tone from the succeeding exchange within its two second timeout. A CCF signal is sent to the succeeding exchange. A repeat attempt is made on another circuit and it is assumed that the reattempt also fails. In such a case of double continuity failure, an REL message (Cause 127) is sent to the preceding exchange. An RLC message completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.4.3 Congestion signal received after address complete** + +Figure 38 shows the CGC signal received after ADC signal. On the incoming side an REL message (Cause value 34) is sent to the preceding exchange indicating the congestion condition. An RLC message completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.4.4 Timeout on address complete message** + +Figure 39 shows the failure to receive an ADC signal within its 20-30 second timeout. A CLF is sent to the succeeding exchange to clear the call. An RLG is then returned by the succeeding exchange. On the incoming side an REL message (Cause 127) is sent to the preceding exchange to indicate the failure. An RLC message is returned by the preceding exchange to complete the signalling sequence. + +### **4.4.5 Timeout on answer message** + +Figure 40 shows the failure to receive an ANC message within its 1.5-3 minute timeout. After the timeout period an REL message (Cause 19) is sent to the preceding exchange and an RLC message is received by the interworking transit to complete the signalling sequence. In parallel, a CLF is sent towards the succeeding exchange. + +### **4.4.6 Reset circuit received before ADC** + +Figure 41 shows the RSC signal received before the ADC signal is sent back by the succeeding exchange. A CLF signal is sent to the succeeding exchange. After an RLG signal is received, a repeat attempt is made on another circuit. + +### **4.4.7 Reset circuit received after ADC** + +Figure 42 shows the RSC signal received after the succeeding exchange sends back the ADC signal. A CLF/RLG sequence is exchanged. On the incoming side, an REL message (Cause 31) is sent to the preceding exchange. An RLC message received from the preceding exchange completes the signalling sequence. + +### **4.4.8 Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +Figure 43 shows an IAM signal received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM signal is ignored and call set-up continues as if it were a normal call. + +### **4.4.9 Reset circuit (non-controlling exchange)** + +Figure 44 shows an IAM signal received from the succeeding exchange in a dual seizure situation. The incoming IAM signal is processed as a normal call. The non-controlling exchange backs off and attempts to set up a call on other circuits of the same or an alternate route. + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an I/C No. 6 circuit between an SS No. 6 exchange and an ISDN-UP exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages (IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, BLO, BLA, CLF, RLG, Blo Ind, Blo Resp, Rel Ind, Rel Resp, Setup Req, Rel Req, Rel Conf, IAM (CI), REL, Cause 127, RLC) and the resulting actions like 'Repeat attempt on another circuit'.](9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a call setup and failure scenario across five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6), Preceding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), and Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP). + +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends an **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Setup Req** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends an **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Both **Incoming SS No. 6** and **Incoming ISUP** send a **CCH Tone** to **Call control**. +- After a 2-second timer expires, **Call control** detects a **CCH Tone Continuity failure** and sends a **BLO** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **Blo Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Blo Resp** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing ISUP** receives a **REL** from **Incoming ISUP** with **Cause 127**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends a **Rel Req** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Rel Conf** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends an **RLC** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **BLA** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends a **CLF** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **Rel Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Rel Resp** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends an **RLG** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** initiates a **Repeat attempt on another circuit**. + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an I/C No. 6 circuit between an SS No. 6 exchange and an ISDN-UP exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages (IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, BLO, BLA, CLF, RLG, Blo Ind, Blo Resp, Rel Ind, Rel Resp, Setup Req, Rel Req, Rel Conf, IAM (CI), REL, Cause 127, RLC) and the resulting actions like 'Repeat attempt on another circuit'. + +T1141750-92/d10 + +NOTE – Cause 127 = Interworking unspecified. + +FIGURE 9/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Continuity failure on I/C No. 6 circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing No. 7 circuit between an SS No. 6 exchange and an ISDN-UP exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, CFL, CLF, and RLG between the entities.](b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between five entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6), Preceding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), and Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP). The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- IAM**: Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Setup Ind**: Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Setup Req**: Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- IAM (CI)**: Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- CCH Tone**: Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6 (wavy line). +- CCH Tone**: Call control to Incoming ISUP (wavy line). +- Continuity failure after $T_{24}$ (2 sec.) expires**: Indicated at the Interworking exchange. +- COT**: Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Cot Ind**: Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Cot Req**: Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- COT (failure)**: Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- CFL**: Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Cfl Req**: Call control to Incoming SS No. 6 (dashed line). +- CLF**: Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Rel Ind**: Call control to Incoming SS No. 6 (dashed line). +- RLG**: Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Rel Resp**: Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). + +Note in the Succeeding exchange area: COT (failure) +Repeat attempt on another circuit. If that attempt fails proceed as shown on No. 6 side this diagram [2.9.1 iv/Q.767] + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing No. 7 circuit between an SS No. 6 exchange and an ISDN-UP exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, CFL, CLF, and RLG between the entities. + +T1141760-92/d11 + +FIGURE 10/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Continuity failure on outgoing No. 7 circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing the release signal flow between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP). The diagram illustrates the exchange of IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, REL, CLF, and RLG messages. The Call control block contains symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X).](5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a call release when the release signal is received before address completion. The entities involved are: + +- Preceding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 6 and Incoming SS No. 6. +- Interworking exchange:** Call control, which acts as an intermediary. It contains symbols for a timer (T), a relay (R), and a switch (X). +- Succeeding exchange:** Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP. + +Sequence of messages: + +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming ISUP** via **Call control**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **REL (cause)** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel Ind** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6** (labeled "see mapping below"). +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **CLF** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **Rel Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel Resp** to **Outgoing ISUP** (marked with an 'X'). +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **RLC** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **RLG** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **Rel Resp** to **Call control** (marked with an 'X'). + +Sequence diagram showing the release signal flow between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP). The diagram illustrates the exchange of IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, REL, CLF, and RLG messages. The Call control block contains symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X). + +T1141770-92/d12 + +| Cause value in REL message | SS No. 6 signal | +|----------------------------|-----------------| +| 1 | UNN | +| 34 | CGC | +| 42 | SEC | +| 17 | SSB | +| 28 | ADI | +| 27 | LOS | +| 4 | SST | +| Other | CFL | + +FIGURE 11/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Release signal received before address complete** + +![Sequence diagram showing a call setup and timeout scenario between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) and a Succeeding exchange (ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control).](e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6) + participant IE_IN as Incoming SS No. 6 + participant CC as Interworking exchange (Call control) + participant IE_OUT as Outgoing ISUP + participant SE as Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP) + + PE->>IE_IN: IAM + IE_IN-->>CC: Setup Ind + CC-->>IE_OUT: Setup Req + IE_OUT->>SE: IAM (CI) + PE-->>SE: CCH Tone (Wavy line) + SE-->>PE: CCH Tone (Wavy line) + PE->>IE_IN: COT + IE_IN-->>CC: Cot Ind + CC-->>IE_OUT: Cot Req + IE_OUT->>SE: COT + Note over CC: ACM Timeout 20-30 sec. + CC-->>IE_OUT: Rel Req + IE_OUT->>SE: REL + SE->>IE_OUT: Cause 31 + SE->>IE_OUT: RLC + IE_OUT-->>CC: Rel Conf + CC-->>IE_IN: Cfl Req + IE_IN->>PE: CFL + Note over PE: (4.8.3/Q.268) + PE->>IE_IN: CLF + IE_IN-->>CC: Rel Ind + CC-->>IE_IN: Rel Resp + IE_IN->>PE: RLG + Note over SE: (2.10.8.3 & 2.1.4.8/Q.767) + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between three main entities: Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange. The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends an **IAM** (Initial Address Message) to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **Setup Ind** (Indication) to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Setup Req** (Request) to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends an **IAM (CI)** (Initial Address Message with Calling Information) to **Incoming ISUP**. +- CCH Tone** is exchanged between the Preceding and Succeeding exchanges (represented by wavy lines). +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends a **COT** (Continuity) message to **Incoming SS No. 6**, which triggers a **Cot Ind** to **Call control**, then a **Cot Req** to **Outgoing ISUP**, and finally a **COT** to the **Incoming ISUP**. +- The **Call control** starts an **ACM Timeout 20-30 sec.** (Address Complete Message Timeout). +- Upon timeout, **Call control** sends a **Rel Req** to **Outgoing ISUP**, which sends a **REL** (Release) to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** responds with **Cause 31** and **RLC** (Release Complete). +- Outgoing ISUP** sends a **Conf** (Confirmation) to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a **Cfl Req** to **Incoming SS No. 6**, which sends a **CFL** (Call-failure signal) to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends a **CLF** (Clear-forward signal) to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a **Rel Ind** to **Call control**, which responds with **Rel Resp**. +- Finally, **Incoming SS No. 6** sends an **RLG** (Release-guard signal) to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. + +Icons in the **Call control** box indicate state changes and internal logic: a circle for initial state, a box with 'T' and 'R' arrows for transmission/reception paths, a timer icon for the ACM timeout, and an 'X' marking the termination of processes. + +Sequence diagram showing a call setup and timeout scenario between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) and a Succeeding exchange (ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control). + +T1141780-92/d13 + +NOTE – Cause 31 = Normal unspecified. + +FIGURE 12/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Timeout on address complete message (ACM)** + +![Sequence diagram showing SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP interworking with a timeout on the answer message.](c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (containing Incoming SS No. 6, Call control, and Outgoing ISUP), and a Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP). The sequence is as follows: + +``` + +Preceding Incoming Call Outgoing Succeeding +Exchange SS No. 6 Control ISUP Exchange +(SS No. 6) (Interworking) (ISUP) + | | | | | + |--- IAM --->| | | | + | |--Setup Ind-->| | | + | | |--Setup Req-->| | + | | | |---IAM (CI)-->| + | | | | | + |<~ CCH Tone ~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~|~ CCH Tone ~>| + | | | | | + |--- COT --->| | | | + | |-- Cot Ind -->| | | + | | |-- Cot Req -->| | + | | | |--- COT --->| + | | | | | + |<--- ADC ---| | | | + | |<-- Proc Req--| | | + | | |<-- Proc Ind--| | + | | | |<--- ACM ---| + | | | | | + |<--- CFL ---| | | | + | |<-- Proc Req--| | | + | | ANM Timeout | | + | | (4.3/Q.118) | | + | | | | | + |<--- CLF ---| | | | + | |<-- Rel Ind --| | | + | | |-- Rel Req -->| | + | | | |--- REL --->| + | | | | (Cause 19)| + |<--- RLG ---| | | | + | |-- Rel Resp ->| | | + | | |<-- Rel Conf--| | + | | | |<--- RLC ---| + +``` + +The Call control column includes functional symbols: a circle for initial state, a box with 'T' and 'R' arrows and a sine wave/clock for tone/timing control, a quartered circle representing the start of the ANM timer, and a circle with an 'X' representing the release state after timeout. + +Sequence diagram showing SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP interworking with a timeout on the answer message. + +T114 1790-92/d14 + +NOTE – Cause 19 = No answer from user. + +FIGURE 13/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Timeout on answer message** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange for a call setup and reset procedure. The diagram includes messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, Setup Req, Cot Req, Rel Ind, Rel Resp, RSC, and RLC. It also shows a 'Repeat attempt on another circuit' message with a reference to [2.10.3.1 e/Q.767].](c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a call setup and reset sequence between three entities: Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange. + +- Preceding exchange** contains two sub-components: **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Interworking exchange** contains a **Call control** component with various symbols: a circle, a box with 'T', 'R', and a meter-like symbol, a circle with a cross-hatch, and a circle with an 'X'. +- Succeeding exchange** contains two sub-components: **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**. + +**Sequence of messages:** + +- IAM** (solid line) from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Setup Ind** (dashed line) from Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control. +- CCH Tone** (wavy line) from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6. +- COT** (solid line) from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Cot Ind** (dashed line) from Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control. +- Setup Req** (dashed line) from Call control to Outgoing ISUP. +- IAM (CI)** (solid line) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- CCH Tone** (wavy line) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- COT** (solid line) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- RSC** (solid line) from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. +- Rel Ind** (dashed line) from Outgoing ISUP to Call control. +- Rel Resp** (dashed line) from Call control to Outgoing ISUP. +- RLC** (solid line) from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. +- Repeat attempt on another circuit [2.10.3.1 e/Q.767]** (solid line) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. + +There are 'X' marks at the bottom of the Call control lifeline, indicating points of failure or error. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange for a call setup and reset procedure. The diagram includes messages like IAM, Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, Setup Req, Cot Req, Rel Ind, Rel Resp, RSC, and RLC. It also shows a 'Repeat attempt on another circuit' message with a reference to [2.10.3.1 e/Q.767]. + +T1141800-92/d15 + +FIGURE 14/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Reset circuit received before ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP interworking for a reset circuit received after ACM. The diagram shows message flows between Preceding exchange, Incoming SS No. 6, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing ISUP, and Succeeding exchange.](7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6) + participant ISS6 as Incoming SS No. 6 + participant CC as Interworking exchange (Call control) + participant OISUP as Outgoing ISUP + participant SE as Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP) + + PE->>ISS6: IAM + ISS6-->>CC: Setup Ind + CC-->>OISUP: Setup Req + OISUP->>SE: IAM (CI) + PE-->>CC: CCH Tone + CC-->>OISUP: CCH Tone + OISUP->>SE: CCH Tone + PE->>ISS6: COT + ISS6-->>CC: Cot Ind + CC-->>OISUP: Cot Req + OISUP->>SE: COT + PE->>ISS6: ADC + ISS6-->>CC: Proc Req + SE->>OISUP: ACM + OISUP-->>CC: Proc Ind + Note over OISUP, SE: [2.10.3.1 a)/Q.767] + SE->>OISUP: RSC + OISUP-->>CC: Rel Ind + CC-->>ISS6: Cfl Req + ISS6->>PE: CFL + Note over ISS6: (4.8.3/Q.268) + CC-->>OISUP: Rel Resp + OISUP->>SE: RLC + PE->>ISS6: CLF + ISS6-->>CC: Rel Ind + CC-->>ISS6: Rel Resp + ISS6->>PE: RLG + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a reset circuit received after ACM. The lifelines are: +**Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6)**, **Incoming SS No. 6**, **Interworking exchange (Call control)**, **Outgoing ISUP**, and **Succeeding exchange (Incoming ISUP)**. + +Key internal symbols in Call control include a through-connection (T/R) with arrows, a switch symbol (black/white circle), and a release symbol (circle with cross). The sequence ends with a 'Resp' primitive and an 'X' mark indicating circuit release. + +Sequence diagram showing SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP interworking for a reset circuit received after ACM. The diagram shows message flows between Preceding exchange, Incoming SS No. 6, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing ISUP, and Succeeding exchange. + +T1141810-92/d16 + +FIGURE 15/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Reset circuit received after ACM** + +![Sequence diagram for SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP call setup. It shows interactions between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing and Incoming SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing and Incoming ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of messages like IAM, Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, ADC, ANC, ACM, and ANM, with a note to 'Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767)'.](cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call setup sequence for a 'Dual seizure (controlling exchange)' scenario from SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP. The participants are: + + +- Preceding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing SS No. 6' and 'Incoming SS No. 6' blocks. +- Interworking exchange:** Contains a 'Call control' block with symbols for a timer, a transmitter/receiver (T/R), and a switch. +- Succeeding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing ISUP' and 'Incoming ISUP' blocks. + + The sequence of messages is as follows: + + +- IAM:** Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Setup Ind:** Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Setup Req:** Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- IAM (CI):** Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767):** Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. +- CCH Tone:** Bidirectional exchange between Outgoing SS No. 6 and Call control, and between Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP. +- COT:** Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Cot Ind:** Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Cot Req:** Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- COT:** Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- ADC:** Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Proc Req:** Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Proc Ind:** Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- ACM:** Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- ANC:** Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Setup Resp:** Incoming SS No. 6 to Call control (dashed line). +- Setup Conf:** Call control to Outgoing ISUP (dashed line). +- ANM:** Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. + +Sequence diagram for SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP call setup. It shows interactions between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing and Incoming SS No. 6), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing and Incoming ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of messages like IAM, Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, ADC, ANC, ACM, and ANM, with a note to 'Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767)'. + +T1141820-92/d17 + +FIGURE 16/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing call setup between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) and a Succeeding exchange (ISDN-UP) via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of IAM, COT, CCH Tone, Setup Ind, Setup Req, and the subsequent handling of a dual seizure by the non-controlling exchange.](aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call setup process between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange through an Interworking exchange. The components and their interactions are as follows: + +- Preceding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing SS No. 6' and 'Incoming SS No. 6' blocks. + - 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends an **IAM** (Initial Address Message) to 'Incoming SS No. 6'. + - 'Incoming SS No. 6' sends a **Setup Ind** (indication) to the 'Call control' block in the Interworking exchange. + - 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **CCH Tone** (wavy line) to the 'Call control' block. + - 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **COT** (Call Offered Tone) to 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- Interworking exchange:** Contains a 'Call control' block with a circle icon and a 'T/R' (Transceiver) icon. + - The 'Call control' block receives a **Setup Req** (request) from the 'Outgoing ISUP' block in the Succeeding exchange. + - The 'Call control' block sends a **Setup Ind** (indication) to the 'Outgoing ISUP' block. +- Succeeding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing ISUP' and 'Incoming ISUP' blocks. + - 'Outgoing ISUP' sends an **IAM (CI)** (Initial Address Message with Calling Information) to the 'Incoming ISUP' block. + - 'Outgoing ISUP' sends a **CCH Tone** (wavy line) to the 'Incoming ISUP' block. + - 'Outgoing ISUP' receives an **IAM** (Initial Address Message) from the 'Incoming ISUP' block. + - Upon receiving the **IAM**, the 'Outgoing ISUP' block executes the following logic: + - Process I/C IAM as normal call (2.10.1.4/Q.767) + - Non-controlling exchange backs off & repeats attempt on the same or alternate route. + +Sequence diagram showing call setup between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 6) and a Succeeding exchange (ISDN-UP) via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of IAM, COT, CCH Tone, Setup Ind, Setup Req, and the subsequent handling of a dual seizure by the non-controlling exchange. + +T1141830-92/d18 + +FIGURE 17/Q.698 +**SS No. 6 to ISDN-UP** +**Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an I/C No. 7 circuit between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of ISUP and SS No. 6 messages, including IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, Rel Req, CLF, and RLG. A failure occurs when the CCH Tone is not received by the Interworking exchange after T24 expires. The Interworking exchange then sends a Rel Req to the Outgoing SS No. 6, which responds with CLF and RLG. The Interworking exchange then sends a Rel Conf to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The failure is indicated by (7.3/Q.724).](8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP) + participant II as Incoming ISUP + participant IE as Interworking exchange (Call control) + participant OS as Outgoing SS No. 6 + participant SE as Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6) + + PE->>II: IAM (CI) + II-->>IE: Setup Ind + IE-->>OS: Setup Req + OS->>SE: IAM + + Note over PE, SE: CCH Tone + Note over IE: Continuity failure after T24 (2 sec.) expires + + PE->>II: COT + Note over II: (failure) + Note over II: (7.3/Q.724) + + IE-->>OS: Rel Req + OS->>SE: CLF + SE->>OS: RLG + IE-->>OS: Rel Conf + +``` + +The diagram illustrates a call setup and failure scenario across five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), Incoming ISUP, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing SS No. 6, and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6). + +- Call Setup:** The Preceding exchange sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming ISUP. The Incoming ISUP sends a **Setup Ind** (dashed arrow) to the Interworking exchange. The Interworking exchange sends a **Setup Req** (dashed arrow) to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an **IAM** to the Succeeding exchange. +- Continuity Check:** A **CCH Tone** (represented by wavy lines) is exchanged. On the left, it's between the Preceding exchange and the Interworking exchange. On the right, it's between the Succeeding exchange and the Interworking exchange. Inside the Interworking exchange block, there are symbols for a transmitter (T) and receiver (R) with tone generation and detection icons. A note indicates "Continuity failure after $T_{24}$ (2 sec.) expires". +- Failure Handling:** The Preceding exchange sends a **COT** to the Incoming ISUP. This is followed by **(failure)** and a reference **(7.3/Q.724)**. An 'X' marks the termination of the call control process. The Interworking exchange sends a **Rel Req** (dashed arrow) to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **CLF** to the Succeeding exchange. The Succeeding exchange responds with **RLG**. Finally, the Interworking exchange sends a **Rel Conf** (dashed arrow) to the Outgoing SS No. 6. + +T1141840-92/d19 + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an I/C No. 7 circuit between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of ISUP and SS No. 6 messages, including IAM, Setup, CCH Tone, COT, Rel Req, CLF, and RLG. A failure occurs when the CCH Tone is not received by the Interworking exchange after T24 expires. The Interworking exchange then sends a Rel Req to the Outgoing SS No. 6, which responds with CLF and RLG. The Interworking exchange then sends a Rel Conf to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The failure is indicated by (7.3/Q.724). + +FIGURE 18/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Continuity failure on I/C No. 7 circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing No. 6 circuit between an ISDN-UP exchange and an SS No. 6 exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages like IAM, CCH Tone, COT, REL, and RLC, and the resulting error handling when a continuity failure occurs after 2 seconds.](69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between five entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP), Incoming ISUP, Interworking exchange (Call control), Outgoing SS No. 6, and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 6). + +- Initial Setup:** The Preceding exchange sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming ISUP. The Incoming ISUP sends a **Setup Ind** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **Setup Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an **IAM** to the Succeeding exchange. +- Continuity Check:** The Call control sends a **CCH Tone** to the Preceding exchange. The Preceding exchange sends a **CCH Tone** to the Incoming ISUP. The Incoming ISUP sends a **Cot Ind** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **CCH Tone** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **CCH Tone** to the Succeeding exchange. A note indicates: "Continuity failure after 2 sec. timer expires" at the Outgoing SS No. 6. +- Error Handling:** The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **Blo Req** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **Blo Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **BLA** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **Rel Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a **RLF** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **Rel Req** to the Incoming ISUP. The Incoming ISUP sends a **REL** to the Preceding exchange. The Preceding exchange sends a **Cause 127** to the Incoming ISUP. The Incoming ISUP sends a **RLC** to the Call control. The Call control sends a **Rel Conf** to the Incoming ISUP. A note indicates: "(4.1.4/Q.261) Repeat attempt on another circuit. If that attempt fails proceed as follows." + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing No. 6 circuit between an ISDN-UP exchange and an SS No. 6 exchange via an interworking exchange. The diagram shows the flow of messages like IAM, CCH Tone, COT, REL, and RLC, and the resulting error handling when a continuity failure occurs after 2 seconds. + +T1141850-92/d20 + +NOTE – Cause 127 = Interworking unspecified. + +FIGURE 19/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Continuity failure on outgoing No. 6 circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with congestion signal. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows the exchange of messages like IAM, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL, RLC, Setup Ind, Cot Ind, Proc Req, Rel Req, Conf, Setup Req, Cot Req, Proc Ind, Cgc Ind, Rel Req, Rel, Conf, ADC, CGC, CLF, RLG. A 'Cause 34' (No circuits available) is indicated in the REL message from the preceding exchange to the succeeding exchange via the interworking exchange.](11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call flow for an ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 connection where a congestion signal is received after address completion. The lifelines are: + + +- Preceding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing ISUP' and 'Incoming ISUP' components. +- Interworking exchange:** Contains a 'Call control' component with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switches. +- Succeeding exchange:** Contains 'Outgoing SS No. 6' and 'Incoming SS No. 6' components. + + The sequence of messages is as follows: + + +- The 'Outgoing ISUP' sends an **IAM (CI)** to the 'Incoming ISUP'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Setup Ind** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Setup Req** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends an **IAM** to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- Wavy lines representing **CCH Tone** are exchanged between the 'Outgoing ISUP' and 'Incoming ISUP' via the 'Call control'. +- The 'Outgoing ISUP' sends a **COT** to the 'Incoming ISUP'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Cot Ind** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Cot Req** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends an **ACM** to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- The 'Incoming SS No. 6' sends an **ADC** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing ISUP' sends a **REL** to the 'Incoming ISUP'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Proc Req** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Proc Ind** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **CGC** to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Rel Req** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Cgc Ind** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing ISUP' sends an **RLC** to the 'Incoming ISUP'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Rel** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Rel Req** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **CLF** to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- The 'Incoming ISUP' sends a **Conf** to the 'Call control'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Rel** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **RLG** to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. +- The 'Call control' sends a **Conf** to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6'. +- The 'Outgoing SS No. 6' sends a **Cause 34** (No circuits available) to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. + + The 'Cause 34' message is shown as part of the **REL** message from the 'Outgoing ISUP' to the 'Incoming ISUP', which is then passed through the 'Call control' to the 'Outgoing SS No. 6' and finally to the 'Incoming SS No. 6'. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with congestion signal. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows the exchange of messages like IAM, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL, RLC, Setup Ind, Cot Ind, Proc Req, Rel Req, Conf, Setup Req, Cot Req, Proc Ind, Cgc Ind, Rel Req, Rel, Conf, ADC, CGC, CLF, RLG. A 'Cause 34' (No circuits available) is indicated in the REL message from the preceding exchange to the succeeding exchange via the interworking exchange. + +T1141860-92/d21 + +NOTE – Cause 34 = No circuits available. + +FIGURE 20/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Congestion signal received after address complete** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 interworking with an ADC timeout. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows message exchanges for Setup, CCH Tone, COT, REL, and RLC, with a timeout event in the Call control lifeline.](c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange via an Interworking exchange. The Preceding exchange contains Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP lifelines. The Succeeding exchange contains Outgoing SS No. 6 and Incoming SS No. 6 lifelines. The Interworking exchange contains a Call control lifeline with icons for a timer, a transceiver (T/R), and a switch. The sequence of messages is as follows: + + +- IAM (CI)** from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- Setup Ind** (dashed) from Incoming ISUP to Call control. +- Setup Req** (dashed) from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6. +- IAM** from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- CCH Tone** (wavy lines) from Incoming ISUP to Call control, and from Call control to Incoming SS No. 6. +- COT** from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- Cot Ind** (dashed) from Incoming ISUP to Call control. +- Cot Req** (dashed) from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6. +- COT** from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- REL** from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- Rel Req** (dashed) from Incoming ISUP to Call control. +- Rel Req** (dashed) from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6. +- CLF** from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- RLC** from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- Rel Conf** (dashed) from Incoming ISUP to Call control. +- Rel** from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 6. +- RLG** from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Incoming SS No. 6. +- Rel Conf** (dashed) from Outgoing SS No. 6 to Call control. +- Cause 127** from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. +- ADC Timeout 20-30 sec.** indicated by a crossed-out circle icon in the Call control lifeline. +- (4.8.1.1 & 4.8.5/Q.268)** text at the bottom right of the Succeeding exchange lifeline. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 interworking with an ADC timeout. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows message exchanges for Setup, CCH Tone, COT, REL, and RLC, with a timeout event in the Call control lifeline. + +T1141870-92/d22 + +NOTE – Cause 127 = Interworking unspecified. + +FIGURE 21/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Timeout on address complete message (ADC)** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN call flow between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates a timeout on the answer message (ANC) from the Succeeding exchange, leading to call release with Cause 19 (No answer from user).](692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of messages and events: + +- Preceding exchange** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control** in the **Interworking exchange**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- CCH Tone** is exchanged between the **Preceding exchange** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between the **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- COT** is sent from **Outgoing SS No. 6** to **Incoming SS No. 6**, and from **Incoming ISUP** to **Call control** (**Cot Ind**). +- ACM** is sent from **Preceding exchange** to **Incoming ISUP**, and from **Incoming SS No. 6** to **Outgoing SS No. 6** (**ADC**). +- Call control** sends **Proc** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Proc Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- An **ANC Timeout (4.3/Q.118)** occurs in the **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Rel** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Rel** is sent from **Incoming ISUP** to **Preceding exchange** (**REL**), which includes **Cause 19**. +- Rel** is sent from **Outgoing SS No. 6** to **Incoming SS No. 6** (**RLF**). +- RLC** is sent from **Preceding exchange** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Call control** sends **Rel Req** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Call control** sends **Conf** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. These messages are marked with an 'X' at the bottom, indicating they are not received or processed. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN call flow between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates a timeout on the answer message (ANC) from the Succeeding exchange, leading to call release with Cause 19 (No answer from user). + +T1141880-92/d23 + +NOTE – Cause 19 = No answer from user. + +FIGURE 22/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Timeout on answer message** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a reset circuit received before ADC. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6).](08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of messages: + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends a dashed **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a dashed **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming SS No. 6**, with **Call control** in the middle. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends a dashed **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a dashed **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **RSC** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a dashed **Rsc Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends a dashed **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **CLF** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Call control** sends a dashed **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **RLG** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends a dashed **Rel Conf** to **Call control**. +- Call control** receives a message indicated by an 'X'. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends a text message: "Repeat attempt on another circuit (4.8.4/Q.268)". + +T1141890-92/d24 + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a reset circuit received before ADC. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). + +FIGURE 23/Q.698 + ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 + Reset circuit received before ADC + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a reset circuit. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows messages like IAM (CI), Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL (Cause 31), RLC, Setup Req, Cot Req, Proc Ind, Rsc Ind, Rel Req, Rel Conf, ADC, RSC, CLF, and RLG. Call control symbols include a circle, a T/R switch, a circle with an X, and a circle with a diagonal line.](7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for an ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call. It begins with the Preceding exchange sending an IAM (CI) to the Incoming ISUP, which then sends a Setup Ind to the Interworking exchange's Call control. The Call control responds with a CCH Tone. The Preceding exchange then sends a COT to the Incoming ISUP, which sends a Cot Ind to the Call control. The Call control sends a Cot Req to the Outgoing SS No. 6, which responds with a COT. The Outgoing SS No. 6 then sends an ADC to the Call control, which sends a Proc Ind to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends an RSC to the Call control, which sends a Rsc Ind to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a CLF to the Call control, which sends a Rel Req to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Outgoing SS No. 6 sends a RLG to the Call control, which sends a Rel Conf to the Outgoing SS No. 6. The Call control then sends a Rel Req to the Incoming ISUP, which sends a REL (Cause 31) to the Outgoing ISUP, which sends a RLC to the Incoming ISUP, which sends a Rel Conf to the Call control. The Call control then sends a X mark, indicating a reset circuit. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call flow with a reset circuit. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The diagram shows messages like IAM (CI), Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL (Cause 31), RLC, Setup Req, Cot Req, Proc Ind, Rsc Ind, Rel Req, Rel Conf, ADC, RSC, CLF, and RLG. Call control symbols include a circle, a T/R switch, a circle with an X, and a circle with a diagonal line. + +T1141900-92/d25 + +NOTE – Cause 31 = Normal unspecified. + +FIGURE 24/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Reset circuit received after ADC** + +![Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call setup with dual seizure. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6).](f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the call setup process for an ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 connection using dual seizure. The lifelines are: + +- Preceding exchange:** Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP. +- Interworking exchange:** Call control (containing T/R and switching symbols). +- Succeeding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 6 and Incoming SS No. 6. + +Sequence of messages: + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **IAM** back to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **Setup Req** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **CCH Tone** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **CCH Tone** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 6**. +- Incoming SS No. 6** sends **ADC** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. +- Outgoing SS No. 6** sends **Proc Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Req** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **ANM** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **ACM** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Resp** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 6**. + +Additional details: The **Call control** lifeline includes a circle symbol at the top, a T/R symbol in the middle, and a switching symbol at the bottom. A note in the **Succeeding exchange** indicates to **Ignore I/C IAM (4.3.5/Q.265)**. + +Sequence diagram showing ISDN-UP to SS No. 6 call setup with dual seizure. Lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). + +T1141910-92/d26 + +FIGURE 25/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing dual seizure of an ISDN-UP to SS No. 6. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The sequence shows IAM (CI) and COT messages from the preceding exchange, which are received by the incoming ISUP and then passed to the call control. The call control sends a Setup Req to the outgoing SS No. 6, which receives an IAM. The outgoing SS No. 6 then processes the I/C IAM as a normal call (4.3.5/Q.26) and sends a CCH Tone to the succeeding exchange. The non-controlling exchange (outgoing SS No. 6) backs off and repeats the attempt on the same or an alternate route.](e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Preceding exchange, an Interworking exchange, and a Succeeding exchange during a dual seizure scenario for ISDN-UP to SS No. 6. + +- Preceding exchange:** Contains **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP** components. + - The **Outgoing ISUP** sends an **IAM (CI)** message to the **Incoming ISUP**. + - The **Incoming ISUP** sends a **Setup Ind** message to the **Interworking exchange**. + - The **Outgoing ISUP** sends a **CCH Tone** message to the **Incoming ISUP**. + - The **Outgoing ISUP** sends a **COT** message to the **Incoming ISUP**. +- Interworking exchange:** Contains a **Call control** component. + - The **Call control** receives the **Setup Ind** message from the **Incoming ISUP**. + - The **Call control** sends a **Setup Req** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 6**. + - The **Call control** receives a **Setup Ind** message from the **Outgoing SS No. 6**. + - The **Call control** sends a **Cot Ind** message to the **Incoming ISUP**. +- Succeeding exchange:** Contains **Outgoing SS No. 6** and **Incoming SS No. 6** components. + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** receives the **Setup Req** message from the **Call control**. + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** sends an **IAM** message to the **Incoming SS No. 6**. + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** receives an **IAM** message from the **Incoming SS No. 6**. + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** processes the **I/C IAM** as a normal call (4.3.5/Q.26). + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** sends a **CCH Tone** message to the **Incoming SS No. 6**. + - The **Outgoing SS No. 6** (Non-controlling exchange) backs off and repeats the attempt on the same or an alternate route. + +Sequence diagram showing dual seizure of an ISDN-UP to SS No. 6. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 6, Incoming SS No. 6). The sequence shows IAM (CI) and COT messages from the preceding exchange, which are received by the incoming ISUP and then passed to the call control. The call control sends a Setup Req to the outgoing SS No. 6, which receives an IAM. The outgoing SS No. 6 then processes the I/C IAM as a normal call (4.3.5/Q.26) and sends a CCH Tone to the succeeding exchange. The non-controlling exchange (outgoing SS No. 6) backs off and repeats the attempt on the same or an alternate route. + +T1141920-92/d27 + +FIGURE 26/Q.698 +**ISDN-UP to SS No. 6** +**Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an incoming TUP circuit at an interworking exchange. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP), Preceding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 TUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Interworking exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP), and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from the outgoing TUP to the incoming TUP. The incoming TUP sends a Setup Ind to the call control. A CCH Tone is sent from the incoming TUP to the call control, and a continuity failure occurs after a 2-second timer expires. The incoming TUP sends a CCF to the call control. The call control sends a Setup Req to the outgoing ISUP. The outgoing ISUP sends an IAM (CI) to the succeeding exchange. A CCH Tone is sent from the succeeding exchange to the call control. The succeeding exchange sends a REL with Cause 31 to the outgoing ISUP. The outgoing ISUP sends a RLC to the call control. The call control sends a Rel Conf to the outgoing ISUP. There are 'X' marks indicating message exchanges that do not occur or are terminated.](f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange +Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP + participant PI as Preceding exchange +Incoming SS No. 7 TUP + participant IE as Interworking exchange +Call control + participant IO as Interworking exchange +Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP + participant SE as Succeeding exchange +Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP + + PE->>PI: IAM (CI) + PI-->>IE: Setup Ind + Note right of PI: CCH Tone +Continuity failure after +2 sec. timer expires + PI->>IE: CCF + Note right of IE: X + IE-->>IO: Setup Req + IO->>SE: IAM (CI) + SE-->>IE: CCH Tone + SE->>IO: REL +Cause 31 + IO->>IE: RLC + IE-->>IO: Rel Conf + Note right of IE: X + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an incoming TUP circuit at an interworking exchange. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP), Preceding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 TUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), Interworking exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP), and Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from the outgoing TUP to the incoming TUP. The incoming TUP sends a Setup Ind to the call control. A CCH Tone is sent from the incoming TUP to the call control, and a continuity failure occurs after a 2-second timer expires. The incoming TUP sends a CCF to the call control. The call control sends a Setup Req to the outgoing ISUP. The outgoing ISUP sends an IAM (CI) to the succeeding exchange. A CCH Tone is sent from the succeeding exchange to the call control. The succeeding exchange sends a REL with Cause 31 to the outgoing ISUP. The outgoing ISUP sends a RLC to the call control. The call control sends a Rel Conf to the outgoing ISUP. There are 'X' marks indicating message exchanges that do not occur or are terminated. + +T1141930-92/d28 + +NOTE – Cause 31 = Normal unspecified. + +FIGURE 27/Q.698 +**Signalling System No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Continuity failure on incoming TUP circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing ISUP circuit between a TUP and an ISUP network via an interworking exchange.](e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interaction between a Preceding exchange (TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (ISUP) through an Interworking exchange (Call control). The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- IAM (CI)**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Setup Ind**: Sent from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. +- CCH Tone**: Sent from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. +- COT**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Cot Ind**: Sent from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. +- CFL**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Cfl Req**: Sent from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. +- CLF**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Rel Ind**: Sent from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. +- RLG**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Rel Resp**: Sent from Call control to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. + +On the ISUP side, the sequence is: + +- Setup Req**: Sent from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- IAM (CI)**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP to Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- CCH Tone**: Sent from Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP to Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- Continuity failure after $T_{24}$ (<2 sec.) expires**: Indicated on the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP side. +- Cot Req**: Sent from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- COT (failure)**: Sent from Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP to Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- Repeat attempt on another circuit. If that attempt fails proceed as shown on TUP side of this diagram [2.9.1 iv/Q.767]**: Indicated on the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP side. + +Sequence diagram showing a continuity failure on an outgoing ISUP circuit between a TUP and an ISUP network via an interworking exchange. + +T1141940-92/d29 + +FIGURE 28/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Continuity failure on outgoing ISUP circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the release signal flow when received before address complete. The sequence includes IAM (CI), Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, Rel Req, CLF, Rel Ind, RLG, and Rel Resp messages. The Call control block contains symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X).](77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a call release between an SS No. 7 TUP network and an SS No. 7 ISUP network via an Interworking exchange (Call control). The sequence starts with an IAM (CI) from the Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP) to the Succeeding exchange (Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP). The Call control receives a Setup Ind and responds with a Setup Req. CCH Tones are exchanged. The Call control receives a COT and responds with a Cot Req. The Preceding exchange receives a Rel Req and sends a CLF. The Call control receives a Rel Ind and responds with a Rel Resp. The Preceding exchange receives a RLG and sends a Rel Resp. The Call control receives a Rel Resp and responds with a Rel Req. The Succeeding exchange receives a REL Cause and sends a RLC. The Call control receives a RLC and responds with a Rel Resp. The sequence ends with a Rel Resp from the Call control to the Preceding exchange. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the release signal flow when received before address complete. The sequence includes IAM (CI), Setup Ind, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, Rel Req, CLF, Rel Ind, RLG, and Rel Resp messages. The Call control block contains symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X). + +T1141950-92/d30 + +| Cause value in REL message | SS No. 7 TUP signal | +|----------------------------|---------------------| +| 42 | SEC | +| 34 | CGC | +| 28 | ADI | +| 1 | UNN | +| 17 | SSB | +| 27 | LOS | +| 4 | SST | +| 65 | DPN | +| Other | CFL | + +FIGURE 29/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Release signal received before address complete** + +![Sequence diagram showing a call flow between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange with Call control. The diagram illustrates a timeout on the address complete message (ACM) and the subsequent release of the call.](5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of messages and events: + +- Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP)** sends an **IAM (CI)** message to the **Interworking exchange (Call control)**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Setup Ind** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends a **CCH Tone** message to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Setup Req** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends an **IAM (CI)** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **CCH Tone** message to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Cot Ind** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **Cot Req** message to the **Call control**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **COT** message to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** reaches an **ACM Timeout 20-30 sec.** (indicated by a crossed-out circle icon). +- The **Call control** sends a **Cfl Req** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends a **CFL** message (referencing **(6.4.3/Q.724)**) to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Rel Req** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **REL** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **Cause 31** message to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Rel Ind** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends a **CLF** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Rel Req** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **RLC** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Rel Conf** message to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **RLG** message (referencing **(2.10.8.3 & 2.1.4.8/Q.767)**) to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** sends a **Rel Resp** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. + +Sequence diagram showing a call flow between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange with Call control. The diagram illustrates a timeout on the address complete message (ACM) and the subsequent release of the call. + +T1141960-92/d31 + +NOTE – Cause 31 = Normal unspecified. + +FIGURE 30/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Timeout on address complete message (ACM)** + +![Sequence diagram showing a timeout on an answer message between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control).](9a5927586a691c4908aa2cf98bd47ebb_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a call setup sequence between a Preceding exchange and a Succeeding exchange through an Interworking exchange (Call control). + +- Preceding exchange:** Contains two entities: Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP and Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- Interworking exchange:** Contains a Call control entity with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and a clock. It also indicates an ANM Timeout (4.3/Q.118). +- Succeeding exchange:** Contains two entities: Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP and Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. + +**Sequence of messages:** + +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **Setup Ind** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Setup Req** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends an **IAM (CI)** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- Both exchanges send **CCH Tone** messages to the Call control. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **COT** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **Cot Req** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Cot Ind** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends an **ACM** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **Proc Req** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Proc Ind** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **REL** to the Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP sends a **Cause 19** to the Call control. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Req** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **CLF** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Ind** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends a **RLG** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Resp** to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. +- The Call control sends a **Rel Conf** to the Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP. + +Icons used in the Call control: A circle with 'T' and 'R' (timer/relay), a circle with a clock face (timeout), and a circle with an 'X' (error/abort). + +Sequence diagram showing a timeout on an answer message between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control). + +T1141970-92/d32 + +NOTE – Cause 19 = No answer from user. + +FIGURE 31/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Timeout on answer message** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages (IAM, CCH Tone, COT, Setup Ind, Setup Req, Rel Ind, Rel, RSC, RLC) and the handling of a reset circuit before ACM. The Interworking exchange contains a Call control block with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X).](0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a call setup and reset between two different SS No. 7 protocols: TUP (Preceding exchange) and ISUP (Succeeding exchange). + +- Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP)** sends **IAM (CI)** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends a **Setup Ind** to the **Interworking exchange**. +- The **Interworking exchange** (Call control) sends a **Setup Req** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Both exchanges send **CCH Tone** signals. +- The **Preceding exchange** sends **COT** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends a **Cot Ind** to the **Interworking exchange**. +- The **Interworking exchange** sends a **Cot Req** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **RSC** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Interworking exchange** sends a **Rel Ind** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **RLC** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Interworking exchange** sends a **Rel** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends a **Resp** to the **Interworking exchange**. +- At the bottom, the text indicates: **Repeat attempt on another circuit [2.10.3.1 e)/Q.767]**. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange. The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages (IAM, CCH Tone, COT, Setup Ind, Setup Req, Rel Ind, Rel, RSC, RLC) and the handling of a reset circuit before ACM. The Interworking exchange contains a Call control block with symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X). + +T114 1980-92/d33 + +FIGURE 32/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Reset circuit received before ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages for call setup and reset procedures. The Interworking exchange contains icons for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X) functions.](798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a call between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control). + +**Sequence of Messages:** + +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** via the **Call control**. +- COT** is sent from **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** to **Call control**, which then sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**, which in turn sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- ACM** is sent from **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** to **Call control**, which sends **Proc Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**, which sends **ACM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. A note **[2.10.3.1 a)/Q.767]** is present next to the ACM message. +- CFL** is sent from **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** to **Call control**, which sends **Cfl Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**, which sends **RSC** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. A note **(6.3/Q.724)** is present next to the CFL message. +- RLF** is sent from **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** to **Call control**, which sends **Rel Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**, which sends **RLC** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- RLG** is sent from **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** to **Call control**, which sends **Rel Resp** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. This message is marked with an 'X'. + +**Call control internal operations:** + +- The **Call control** block contains icons for a timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X). +- The **Setup Req** message from **Call control** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** is associated with the timer (T) icon. +- The **Cot Req** message from **Call control** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** is associated with the relay (R) icon. +- The **Rel Ind** message from **Call control** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** is associated with the switch (X) icon. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages for call setup and reset procedures. The Interworking exchange contains icons for timer (T), relay (R), and switch (X) functions. + +T1141990-92/d34 + +FIGURE 33/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Reset circuit received after ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages for a call setup, including IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, ACM, Proc Req, ANC, Setup Resp, Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767), and ANM. The Interworking exchange contains icons for a timer, a relay, and a switch.](cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for a call setup between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP) and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) via an Interworking exchange (Call control). + +**Sequence of Messages:** + +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **IAM** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767)** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Call control** sends **CCH Tone** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **CCH Tone** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Preceding exchange** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Preceding exchange** sends **ACM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Proc Req** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **ACM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Preceding exchange** sends **ANC** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Setup Resp** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Rel** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends **ANM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- Call control** sends **Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP). The diagram illustrates the flow of signaling messages for a call setup, including IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, ACM, Proc Req, ANC, Setup Resp, Ignore I/C IAM (2.10.1.4/Q.767), and ANM. The Interworking exchange contains icons for a timer, a relay, and a switch. + +T1142000-92/d35 + +FIGURE 34/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** +**Reset circuit received after ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) during a dual seizure scenario. The diagram illustrates the flow of IAM, CCH Tone, and COT messages, and the subsequent setup requests and responses within the Interworking exchange.](e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the following sequence of events: + +- Preceding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP)** sends an **IAM** message to the **Interworking exchange**. +- The **Interworking exchange** (Call control) receives the **IAM** and sends a **Setup Ind** (dashed line) to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Preceding exchange** sends a **CCH Tone** (wavy line) to the **Interworking exchange**. +- The **Interworking exchange** receives the **CCH Tone** and sends a **COT** message to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Interworking exchange** (Call control) sends a **Setup Req** (dashed line) to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends an **IAM (CI)** message to the **Succeeding exchange**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** receives a **CCH Tone** (wavy line) from the **Succeeding exchange**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** sends an **IAM** message to the **Succeeding exchange**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP** receives a **Setup Ind** (dashed line) from the **Succeeding exchange**. +- Inside the **Outgoing SS No. 7 ISUP**, a text box indicates: "Process I/C IAM as normal call (2.10.1.4/Q.767) Non-controlling exchange backs off and repeats attempt on the same or alternate route." + +Sequence diagram showing the interaction between a Preceding exchange (SS No. 7 TUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (SS No. 7 ISUP) during a dual seizure scenario. The diagram illustrates the flow of IAM, CCH Tone, and COT messages, and the subsequent setup requests and responses within the Interworking exchange. + +T1142010-92d36 + +FIGURE 35/Q.698 +**SS No. 7 TUP to ISUP** +**Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP with a continuity failure on the incoming ISUP circuit. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. Incoming ISUP sends Setup Ind to Call control. Call control sends Setup Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends IAM to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends CCH Tone to Call control. Call control sends CCH Tone to Incoming ISUP. Incoming ISUP sends COT (failure) to Outgoing ISUP. Outgoing ISUP sends (7.3/Q.724) to Call control. Call control sends Rel Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CLF to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends RLG to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends Rel Conf to Call control. Call control sends a failure indication (X) to Incoming ISUP.](0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange + participant IE as Interworking exchange + participant SE as Succeeding exchange + + Note left of PE: Outgoing ISUP + Note left of PE: Incoming ISUP + Note right of IE: Call control + Note right of SE: Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP + Note right of SE: Incoming SS No. 7 TUP + + PE->>PE: IAM (CI) + PE->>IE: Setup Ind + IE->>SE: Setup Req + SE->>SE: IAM + SE->>IE: CCH Tone + IE->>PE: CCH Tone + PE->>PE: COT (failure) + PE->>IE: (7.3/Q.724) + IE->>SE: Rel Req + SE->>SE: CLF + SE->>SE: RLG + SE->>IE: Rel Conf + IE-x PE: + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP with a continuity failure on the incoming ISUP circuit. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. Incoming ISUP sends Setup Ind to Call control. Call control sends Setup Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends IAM to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends CCH Tone to Call control. Call control sends CCH Tone to Incoming ISUP. Incoming ISUP sends COT (failure) to Outgoing ISUP. Outgoing ISUP sends (7.3/Q.724) to Call control. Call control sends Rel Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CLF to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends RLG to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends Rel Conf to Call control. Call control sends a failure indication (X) to Incoming ISUP. + +T1142020-92/d37 + +FIGURE 36/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Continuity failure on incoming ISUP circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP with a continuity failure on the outgoing TUP circuit. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence shows the call setup, a continuity failure detected by the TUP, and the subsequent error handling messages (CCF, CCR, REL, RLC) sent back to the preceding exchange.](c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant PE as Preceding exchange + participant IE as Interworking exchange + participant SE as Succeeding exchange + + Note left of PE: Outgoing ISUP + Note left of PE: Incoming ISUP + Note right of IE: Call control + Note right of SE: Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP + Note right of SE: Incoming SS No. 7 TUP + + PE->>IE: IAM (CI) + IE-->>PE: Setup Ind + Note right of IE: [T/R] + IE->>SE: Setup Req + SE->>SE: IAM + Note right of SE: CCH Tone + Note right of SE: Continuity failure after 2 sec. timer expires + SE->>SE: CCF + Note right of SE: Repeat attempt on another circuit + IE->>SE: Ccf Req + IE->>SE: Ccr Req + SE->>SE: CCR + Note right of SE: CCH Tone (7.3/Q.724) + IE-->>PE: Rel Req + PE->>PE: REL + Note left of PE: Cause 127 + PE->>PE: RLC + IE-->>PE: Rel Conf + Note right of IE: X + +``` + +Sequence diagram showing interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP with a continuity failure on the outgoing TUP circuit. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence shows the call setup, a continuity failure detected by the TUP, and the subsequent error handling messages (CCF, CCR, REL, RLC) sent back to the preceding exchange. + +T1142030-92/d38 + +## NOTES + +- 1 Cause 127 = Interworking unspecified. +- 2 CCR is sent to 1-10 s after failure detection. + +FIGURE 37/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Continuity failure on outgoing TUP circuit** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves four main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. Outgoing ISUP sends IAM (CI) to Incoming ISUP. 2. Incoming ISUP sends Setup Ind to Call control. 3. Call control sends Setup Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends IAM to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. Wavy lines represent CCH Tones between ISUP and TUP via Call control. 6. Outgoing ISUP sends COT to Incoming ISUP. 7. Incoming ISUP sends Cot Ind to Call control. 8. Call control sends Cot Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 9. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends COT to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 10. Outgoing ISUP sends ACM to Incoming ISUP. 11. Incoming ISUP sends Proc Req to Call control. 12. Call control sends Proc Ind to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 13. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends ADC to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 14. Outgoing ISUP sends REL with Cause 34 to Incoming ISUP. 15. Incoming ISUP sends Rel Req to Call control. 16. Call control sends Cgc Ind to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 17. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CGC to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 18. Outgoing ISUP sends RLC to Incoming ISUP. 19. Incoming ISUP sends Rel Conf to Call control (marked with X). 20. Call control sends Rel Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 21. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CLF to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 22. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends RLG to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 23. Call control sends Rel Conf to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP (marked with X).](38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves four main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. Outgoing ISUP sends IAM (CI) to Incoming ISUP. 2. Incoming ISUP sends Setup Ind to Call control. 3. Call control sends Setup Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends IAM to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. Wavy lines represent CCH Tones between ISUP and TUP via Call control. 6. Outgoing ISUP sends COT to Incoming ISUP. 7. Incoming ISUP sends Cot Ind to Call control. 8. Call control sends Cot Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 9. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends COT to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 10. Outgoing ISUP sends ACM to Incoming ISUP. 11. Incoming ISUP sends Proc Req to Call control. 12. Call control sends Proc Ind to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 13. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends ADC to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 14. Outgoing ISUP sends REL with Cause 34 to Incoming ISUP. 15. Incoming ISUP sends Rel Req to Call control. 16. Call control sends Cgc Ind to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 17. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CGC to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 18. Outgoing ISUP sends RLC to Incoming ISUP. 19. Incoming ISUP sends Rel Conf to Call control (marked with X). 20. Call control sends Rel Req to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 21. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends CLF to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 22. Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP sends RLG to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 23. Call control sends Rel Conf to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP (marked with X). + +T1142040-92/d39 + +NOTE – Cause 34 = No circuits available. + +FIGURE 38/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Congestion signal received after address complete** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram illustrates a call setup and release process between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP) and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP) via an Interworking exchange containing a Call control unit. The process involves IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, IAM, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, Cot Req, ACM Timeout (20-30 sec.), REL, Rel Req, Rel, CLF, RLC, Rel Conf, and RLG messages. The Call control unit includes symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and a circle with a cross (X).](12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. It shows the following sequence of messages and actions: + +- Preceding exchange** (Outgoing ISUP) sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to the **Interworking exchange** (Call control). +- The **Call control** unit sends **Setup Req** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Both **CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **COT** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Cot Ind** to the **Call control**. +- The **Call control** unit sends **Cot Req** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **REL** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Cause 31** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **RLC** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Call control** unit sends **Rel Req** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **Rel** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Call control** unit sends **Rel Conf** to the **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- The **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **RLG** to the **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- An **ACM Timeout** (20-30 sec.) occurs in the **Call control** unit. + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram illustrates a call setup and release process between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP) and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP) via an Interworking exchange containing a Call control unit. The process involves IAM (CI), Setup Ind, Setup Req, IAM, CCH Tone, COT, Cot Ind, Cot Req, ACM Timeout (20-30 sec.), REL, Rel Req, Rel, CLF, RLC, Rel Conf, and RLG messages. The Call control unit includes symbols for timer (T), relay (R), and a circle with a cross (X). + +T1142050-92/d40 + +NOTE – Cause 127 = Interworking unspecified. + +FIGURE 39/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Timeout on address complete message (ACM)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram illustrates the message exchange between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence includes IAM (CI), CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL, Cause 19, and RLC messages, with a timeout mechanism for the answer message (ANC Timeout (4.3/Q.118)).](5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. It shows the message exchange between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). + +**Sequence of Messages:** + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- CCH Tone** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- COT** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- ACM** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- REL** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Cause 19** is included in the **REL** message from **Outgoing ISUP** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- RLC** messages are exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and **Incoming ISUP**, and between **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** and **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Req** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Proc Ind** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Call control** sends **Rel Req** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Rel Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Call control** sends **Rel Conf** to **Incoming ISUP** and **Rel Conf** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Call control** has an **ANC Timeout (4.3/Q.118)** mechanism. + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram illustrates the message exchange between a Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), an Interworking exchange (Call control), and a Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence includes IAM (CI), CCH Tone, COT, ACM, REL, Cause 19, and RLC messages, with a timeout mechanism for the answer message (ANC Timeout (4.3/Q.118)). + +T1142060-92/d41 + +NOTE – Cause 19 = No answer from user. + +FIGURE 40/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Timeout on answer message** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves three main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 2. Setup Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 3. Setup Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. IAM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. CCH Tone from Outgoing ISUP to Call control. 6. CCH Tone from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 7. COT from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 8. Cot Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 9. Cot Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 10. COT from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 11. Rsc Ind from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 12. RSC from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 13. Rel Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 14. CLF from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 15. Rel from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 16. RLG from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 17. Conf from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP (marked with an X). 18. 'Repeat attempt on another circuit (1.15.1 f/Q.724)' from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP.](dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves three main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 2. Setup Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 3. Setup Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. IAM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. CCH Tone from Outgoing ISUP to Call control. 6. CCH Tone from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 7. COT from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 8. Cot Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 9. Cot Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 10. COT from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 11. Rsc Ind from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 12. RSC from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 13. Rel Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 14. CLF from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 15. Rel from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 16. RLG from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 17. Conf from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP (marked with an X). 18. 'Repeat attempt on another circuit (1.15.1 f/Q.724)' from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. + +T1142070-92/d42 + +FIGURE 41/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Reset circuit received before ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 2. Setup Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 3. Setup Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. IAM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. CCH Tone from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 6. CCH Tone from Call control to Outgoing ISUP. 7. COT from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 8. Cot Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 9. Cot Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 10. COT from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 11. ACM from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 12. Proc Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 13. Proc Ind from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 14. ACM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 15. REL from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 16. Rel Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 17. Rsc from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 18. RSC from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 19. Cause 31 from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 20. Rel Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 21. CLF from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 22. RLC from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 23. Rel Conf from Call control to Incoming ISUP (marked with X). 24. Rel Conf from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control (marked with X).](2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves five lifelines: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence of messages is: 1. IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 2. Setup Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 3. Setup Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 4. IAM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 5. CCH Tone from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 6. CCH Tone from Call control to Outgoing ISUP. 7. COT from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 8. Cot Ind from Incoming ISUP to Call control. 9. Cot Req from Call control to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 10. COT from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 11. ACM from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 12. Proc Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 13. Proc Ind from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control. 14. ACM from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 15. REL from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP. 16. Rel Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 17. Rsc from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 18. RSC from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. 19. Cause 31 from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 20. Rel Req from Call control to Incoming ISUP. 21. CLF from Incoming SS No. 7 TUP to Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP. 22. RLC from Incoming ISUP to Outgoing ISUP. 23. Rel Conf from Call control to Incoming ISUP (marked with X). 24. Rel Conf from Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP to Call control (marked with X). + +T1142080-92/d43 + +NOTE – Cause 31 = Normal unspecified. + +FIGURE 42/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Reset circuit received after ACM** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP during a dual seizure where the interworking exchange is controlling. The diagram shows message flows between Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange.](4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence for call setup between an ISUP network and a TUP network through an interworking exchange during a dual seizure. The lifelines are: + +- Preceding exchange:** Outgoing ISUP and Incoming ISUP. +- Interworking exchange:** Call control, containing logic symbols for a timer (circle), a transceiver (T/R) with tone/clock icons, and a switch state (crossed circle). +- Succeeding exchange:** Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP and Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. + +The sequence of messages is as follows: + +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **IAM (CI)** to **Incoming ISUP**. +- Incoming ISUP** sends **Setup Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP** sends **IAM** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Simultaneously, **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends an **IAM** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**. A note indicates: *Ignore I/C IAM (2.5/Q.724)*. +- CCH Tone** is exchanged between **Outgoing ISUP** and the **Call control** (T/R block), and between **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** and the **Call control**. +- Outgoing ISUP** sends **COT** to **Incoming ISUP**, which then sends **Cot Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Cot Req** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**, which sends **COT** to **Incoming SS No. 7 TUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **ACM** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**, which sends **Proc Ind** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Proc Req** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **ACM** to **Outgoing ISUP**. +- Incoming SS No. 7 TUP** sends **ANM** to **Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP**, which sends **Setup Conf** to **Call control**. +- Call control** sends **Setup Resp** to **Incoming ISUP**, which sends **ANM** to **Outgoing ISUP**. + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP during a dual seizure where the interworking exchange is controlling. The diagram shows message flows between Preceding exchange, Interworking exchange, and Succeeding exchange. + +T1142090-92/d44 + +FIGURE 43/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Dual seizure (controlling exchange)** + +![Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves three main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP, which then sends a Setup Ind to the Call control. The Call control sends a Setup Req to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, which responds with IAM to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends an IAM back to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, which then sends a Setup Ind to the Call control. The Call control sends a COT to the Incoming ISUP, which sends a Cot Ind to the Outgoing ISUP. Wavy lines represent CCH Tones being exchanged between the Call control and both the Outgoing and Incoming ISUP/TUP units. A note in the Succeeding exchange indicates that the non-controlling exchange backs off and repeats the attempt on the same or an alternate route.](701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg) + +Preceding exchange + +Outgoing ISUP + +Incoming ISUP + +Interworking exchange + +Call control + +Succeeding exchange + +Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP + +Incoming SS No. 7 TUP + +IAM (CI) + +Setup Ind + +Setup Req + +IAM + +Setup Ind + +Process I/C IAM as a normal call (2.5/Q.724) + +CCH Tone + +COT + +Cot Ind + +Non-controlling exchange backs off and repeats attempt on the same or an alternate route. + +Sequence diagram showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP. The diagram involves three main entities: Preceding exchange (Outgoing ISUP, Incoming ISUP), Interworking exchange (Call control), and Succeeding exchange (Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, Incoming SS No. 7 TUP). The sequence starts with IAM (CI) from Outgoing ISUP to Incoming ISUP, which then sends a Setup Ind to the Call control. The Call control sends a Setup Req to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, which responds with IAM to the Incoming SS No. 7 TUP. The Incoming SS No. 7 TUP sends an IAM back to the Outgoing SS No. 7 TUP, which then sends a Setup Ind to the Call control. The Call control sends a COT to the Incoming ISUP, which sends a Cot Ind to the Outgoing ISUP. Wavy lines represent CCH Tones being exchanged between the Call control and both the Outgoing and Incoming ISUP/TUP units. A note in the Succeeding exchange indicates that the non-controlling exchange backs off and repeats the attempt on the same or an alternate route. + +T1142100-92/d45 + +FIGURE 44/Q.698 +**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 ISUP to No. 7 TUP** +**Dual seizure (non-controlling exchange)** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07882e53216010a60e9a65c2269a1383f90fa8f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8d55bc1404a00110e016e59b37c568857c51417048eaede96b71d932cccb62e1 +size 8202 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80b0d90713e407dffd77dc16bec9237924c7555a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74d4d15f9830bc49ad74248fdc9da825543ef321578ea678ffa375e4ad5920a2 +size 26063 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9cf0cbb510cce7ea31d069493b0d22abadb99fff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bd8a073aa36c4eb4abab745804206944ff35d3e108f6bb1a480c724c590536a3 +size 85705 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e287b056ad24f50122b693004fecbcf0a092a32d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8aabee0bb5e30ea4cd377104b52e9b7a4396b12d3e53a3f63d262d94ca1f4a59 +size 71483 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69add81ad29bf359e088ba21dc9e055709173e4e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:26c43b46b797cd2eb442b654ba5f173ca8ba0d074b5fbcf6cb7c513550dfb91d +size 17849 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32a45c16106d4986516d118a0710a97b8efc2c49 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:875ea3d3f9cfb31902004337a1d3ba339243614bb45880cf3545ec476560519e +size 55654 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a20f08b1cc06a65506eac84af6d2f1936674b73a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fc4592f7a62ad2cf75880ac9c3312be93ec368ef1985b61ce8b32f4dcfeb4f8f +size 37563 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4416cc4e2be518474ab24a12642d9754851ab9a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2896c50a83e041718751e5fda32abbcc4348a1e041eb8f96b58d2554dbf9f05f +size 67913 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd59a2a4ce8f583413bc2088553a77f6eea8f1cb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,870 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.700** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(03/93) + +**SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING +SYSTEM No. 7** + +--- + +**INTRODUCTION TO CCITT +SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.700** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.700 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms "CCITT, CCIR or IFRB" or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +*Page* + +| | | | +|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | General ..... | 1 | +| 1.1 | Objectives and fields of application..... | 1 | +| 1.2 | General characteristics ..... | 2 | +| 1.3 | Components of SS No. 7 ..... | 2 | +| 1.4 | Description techniques in the Q.7xx-Series Recommendations ..... | 3 | +| 2 | SS No. 7 signalling network..... | 3 | +| 2.1 | Basic concepts ..... | 3 | +| 2.2 | Signalling network components..... | 3 | +| 2.3 | Signalling point modes ..... | 4 | +| 2.4 | Signalling routes ..... | 5 | +| 2.5 | Signalling network structure ..... | 5 | +| 3 | SS No. 7 functional blocks..... | 6 | +| 3.1 | Basic functional division ..... | 6 | +| 3.2 | SS No. 7 architecture ..... | 7 | +| 4 | OSI layering and SS No. 7 ..... | 9 | +| 4.1 | OSI Layering ..... | 9 | +| 4.2 | Relationship between SS No. 7 layering and the OSI model..... | 10 | +| 4.3 | Primitive Interfaces between SS No. 7 Functions ..... | 10 | +| 5 | Addressing ..... | 11 | +| 5.1 | Signalling message structure ..... | 12 | +| 5.2 | MTP addressing ..... | 12 | +| 5.3 | SCCP addressing ..... | 15 | +| 5.4 | User Part addressing ..... | 15 | +| 5.5 | Labelling ..... | 16 | +| 6 | Operations administration and maintenance ..... | 16 | +| 6.1 | Management ..... | 16 | +| 6.2 | Maintenance and testing ..... | 16 | +| 6.3 | SS No. 7 measurements ..... | 17 | +| 7 | Signalling system performance ..... | 17 | +| 7.1 | Hypothetical Signalling Reference Connection (HSRC)..... | 17 | +| 7.2 | MTP ..... | 17 | +| 7.3 | SCCP ..... | 17 | +| 7.4 | TUP ..... | 18 | +| 7.5 | ISUP ..... | 18 | +| 8 | Flow control ..... | 18 | +| 8.1 | Signalling network flow control ..... | 18 | +| 8.2 | Signalling node (congestion) flow control..... | 18 | +| 9 | Compatibility mechanisms and rules in SS No. 7 ..... | 18 | +| 9.1 | Background..... | 18 | +| 9.2 | Evolutionary requirements..... | 19 | +| 9.3 | Forward and backward compatibility ..... | 19 | +| 9.4 | Compatibility rules for SS No. 7 ..... | 19 | +| 10 | Glossary..... | 20 | + + + +# **INTRODUCTION TO CCITT SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7** + +*(Melbourne 1988; modified at Helsinki 1993)* + +# **1 General** + +This Recommendation provides an overview of the Signalling System by describing the various functional elements of CCITT Signalling System No. 7 (SS No. 7) and the relationship between these functional elements. This Recommendation provides a general description of functions and capabilities of the Message Transfer Part (MTP), Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP), Telephone User Part, ISDN User Part (ISUP), Transaction Capabilities (TC), and the Operations, Maintenance and Administration Part (OMAP) which are covered elsewhere in the Q.7xx-Series Recommendations. (This includes Recommendations Q.700 to Q.787.) However, in the case of contradiction between a particular specification and Recommendation Q.700, the particular specification shall apply. + +The SS No. 7 ISDN supplementary services are described in the Q.73x-Series Recommendations. + +In addition to these functions in the SS No. 7 signalling system, the Q.7xx Series Recommendations describes the SS No. 7 network structure, and also specifies the tests and measurements applicable to SS No. 7. + +This Recommendation also contains information about other aspects such as SS No. 7 architecture, flow control and general compatibility rule which are not specified in separate Recommendations, and are applicable to the overall scope of SS No. 7. Recommendation Q.1400 also contains information about architecture and compatibility. + +The remainder of this Recommendation describes: + +- clause 2: Signalling network concepts components and modes; +- clause 3: The functional blocks within SS No. 7 and the services provided by them; +- clause 4: SS No. 7 protocol layering and its relationship to OSI modelling; +- clause 5: Node, application entity and user part addressing; +- clause 6: Operations, administration and maintenance aspects of SS No. 7; +- clause 7: Performance aspects of the functional blocks within SS No. 7; +- clause 8: Flow control for both the signalling network and within nodes; +- clause 9: Rules for evolving SS No. 7 protocols while preserving compatibility with earlier versions; +- clause 10: A cross-reference to a glossary of terms. + +## **1.1 Objectives and fields of application** + +The overall objective of SS No. 7 is to provide an internationally standardized general purpose common channel signalling (CCS) system: + +- optimized for operation in digital telecommunications networks in conjunction with stored program controlled exchanges; + - that can meet present and future requirements of information transfer for inter-processor transactions within telecommunications networks for call control, remote control, and management and maintenance signalling; +- that provides a reliable means for transfer of information in correct sequence and without loss or duplication. + +The signalling system meets requirements of call control signalling for telecommunication services such as the telephone, ISDN and circuit switched data transmission services. It can also be used as a reliable transport system for other types of information transfer between exchanges and specialized centres in telecommunications networks (e.g. for + +management and maintenance purposes). The system is thus applicable for multipurpose uses in networks that are dedicated for particular services and in multiservices networks. The signalling system is intended to be applicable in international and national networks. + +The scope of SS No. 7 encompasses both circuit related and non-circuit related signalling. + +Examples of applications supported by SS No. 7 are: + +- PSTN; +- ISDN; +- Interaction with Network Databases, Service Control Points for service control; +- Mobiles (Public Land Mobile Network); +- Operations Administration and Maintenance of Networks. + +The signalling system is optimized for operation over 64 kbit/s digital channels. It is also suitable for operation over analogue channels and at lower speeds. The system is suitable for use on point-to-point terrestrial and satellite links. It does not include the special features required for use in point-to-multipoint operation but can, if required, be extended to cover such an application. + +### 1.2 General characteristics + +Common channel signalling is a signalling method in which a single channel conveys, by means of labelled messages, signalling information relating to, for example, a multiplicity of circuits, or other information such as that used for network management. Common channel signalling can be regarded as a form of data communication that is specialized for various types of signalling and information transfer between processors in telecommunications networks. + +The signalling system uses signalling links for transfer of signalling messages between exchanges or other nodes in the telecommunication network served by the system. Arrangements are provided to ensure reliable transfer of signalling information in the presence of transmission disturbances or network failures. These include error detection and correction on each signalling link. The system is normally applied with redundancy of signalling links and it includes functions for automatic diversion of signalling traffic to alternative paths in case of link failures. The capacity and reliability for signalling may thus be dimensioned by provision of a multiplicity of signalling links according to the requirements of each application. + +### 1.3 Components of SS No. 7 + +SS No. 7 consists of a number of components or functions which are defined in the Q.7xx-Series Recommendations. + +| SS No. 7 function | Recommendations | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------| +| Message Transfer Part (MTP) | Q.701-Q.704, Q.706, Q.707 | +| Telephone User Part (TUP) (including some supplementary services) | Q.721-Q.725 | +| Supplementary services | Q.73x Series | +| Data User Part (DUP) | Q.741 (see Note) | +| ISDN User Part (ISUP) | Q.761-Q.764, Q.766 | +| Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) | Q.711-Q.714, Q.716 | +| Transaction Capabilities (TC) | Q.771-Q.775 | +| Operations Maintenance and Administration Part (OMAP) | Q.750-Q.755 | + +NOTE – Functions of the DUP are fully specified in Recommendation X.61. + +Other Q.7xx-Series Recommendations which describe other aspects of the signalling system which are not part of the SS No. 7 signalling interfaces are: + +| Title | Recommendations | +|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------| +| Signalling Network Structure | Q.705 | +| Numbering of International Signalling Point Codes | Q.708 | +| Hypothetical signalling reference connection | Q.709 | +| PABX application | Q.710 | +| SS No. 7 Test Specification (General) | Q.780 | +| MTP Level 2 Test Specification | Q.781 | +| MTP Level 3 Test Specification | Q.782 | +| TUP Test Specification | Q.783 | +| ISUP Test Specification | Q.784 | +| ISUP Supplementary Service Test Specification | Q.785 | +| SCCP Test Specification | Q.786 | +| TCAP Test Specification | Q.787 | + +Clause 3 describes the relationship between these components. + +### **1.4 Description techniques in the Q.7xx-Series Recommendations** + +The SS No. 7 Recommendation Series defines the signalling system using prose description which is complemented by SDL diagrams and state transition diagrams. Should any conflict arise between the text and the SDL definition, the textual description is taken as definitive. + +Message sequence charts or arrow diagrams are used to illustrate examples of signalling procedures, but are not considered definitive. + +Data description are increasingly using ASN.1 method of description. + +## **2 SS No. 7 signalling network** + +## **2.1 Basic concepts** + +A telecommunications network served by common channel signalling is composed of a number of switching and processing nodes interconnected by transmission links. To communicate using SS No. 7, each of these nodes requires to implement the necessary "within node" features of SS No. 7 making that node a signalling point within the SS No. 7 network. In addition, there will be a need to interconnect these signalling points such that SS No. 7 signalling information (data) may be conveyed between them. These data links are the signalling links of SS No. 7 signalling network. + +The combination of signalling points and their interconnecting signalling links form the SS No. 7 signalling network. + +## **2.2 Signalling network components** + +### **2.2.1 Signalling points** + +In specific cases there may be a need to partition the common channel signalling functions at such a (physical) node into logically separate entities from a signalling network point of view; i.e. a given (physical) node may be defined as more than one signalling point. One example is an exchange at the boundary between international and national signalling networks. + +Any two signalling points, for which the possibility of communication between their corresponding User Part function exists, are said to have a signalling relation. + +The corresponding concept for a given User Part is called a user signalling relation. + +An example is when two telephone exchanges are directly connected by a bundle of speech circuits. The exchange of telephone signalling relating to these circuits then constitutes a user signalling relation between the Telephone User Part functions in those exchanges in their role as signalling points. + +Another example is when administration of customer and routing data in a telephone exchange is remotely controlled from an operation and maintenance centre by means of communication through a common channel signalling system. + +Examples of nodes in a signalling network that constitutes signalling points are: + +- exchanges (switching centres); +- service control points; +- signalling transfer points; +- operation, administration and maintenance centres. + +All signalling points in a SS No. 7 network are identified by a unique code known as a point code (Recommendation Q.704 refers). + +### 2.2.2 Signalling links + +The common channel signalling system uses signalling links to convey the signalling messages between two signalling points. A number of signalling links that directly interconnect two signalling points which are used as a module constitute a signalling link-set. Although a link set typically includes all parallel signalling links, it is possible to use more than one link set in parallel between two signalling points. A group of links within a link set that have identical characteristics (e.g. the same data link bearer rate) is called a link group. + +Two signalling points that are directly interconnected by a signalling link are, from a signalling network structure point of view, referred to as adjacent signalling points. Correspondingly, two signalling points that are not directly interconnected are non-adjacent signalling points. + +### 2.2.3 Signalling modes + +The term “signalling mode” refers to the association between the path taken by a signalling message and the signalling relation to which the message refers. + +In the associated mode of signalling, the messages relating to a particular signalling relation between two adjacent points are conveyed over a link set, directly interconnecting those signalling points. + +In the non-associated mode of signalling, the messages relating to a particular signalling relation are conveyed over two or more linksets in tandem passing through one or more signalling points other than those which are the origin and the destination of the messages. + +The quasi-associated mode of signalling is a limited case of the non-associated mode where the path taken by the message through the signalling network is pre-determined and, at a given point in time, fixed. + +SS No. 7 is specified for use in the associated and quasi-associated modes. The Message Transfer Part does not include features to avoid out-of-sequence arrival of messages or other problems that would typically arise in a fully non-associated mode of signalling with dynamic message routing. + +Examples of signalling modes are illustrated in Figure 1. + +## 2.3 Signalling point modes + +A signalling point at which a message is generated, i.e. the location of the source User Part function, is the originating point of that message. + +A signalling point to which a message is destined, i.e. the location of the receiving User Part function, is the destination point of that message. + +For a particular signalling relation, the two signalling points thus function as originating and destination points for the messages exchanged in the two directions between them. + +![Diagram illustrating four signalling modes: Associated (circle-circle), Associated (triangle-triangle), Quasi-associated (circle-circle with a square below one circle), and Quasi-associated (circle-circle with squares below both circles). A legend defines the symbols: dashed line for 'Signalling relation', solid line for 'Signalling link set', circle for 'Signalling point with at least user function', square for 'Signalling point with at least STP-function', circle with square for 'Signalling point with both user function and STP-function', and triangle for 'Signalling point; irrelevant whether user function and/or STP-function is present'. The code T1156060-93/d01 is present.](ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg) + +Associated      Associated      Quasi-associated      Quasi-associated + +--- Signalling relation + — Signalling link set + +○ Signalling point with at least user function; + whether or not STP-function is present in the context of the graph + +□ Signalling point with at least STP-function; + whether or not user function is present in the context of the graph + +⊞ Signalling point with both user function and STP-function + +△ Signalling point; + irrelevant whether user function and/or STP-function is present + +T1156060-93/d01 + +Diagram illustrating four signalling modes: Associated (circle-circle), Associated (triangle-triangle), Quasi-associated (circle-circle with a square below one circle), and Quasi-associated (circle-circle with squares below both circles). A legend defines the symbols: dashed line for 'Signalling relation', solid line for 'Signalling link set', circle for 'Signalling point with at least user function', square for 'Signalling point with at least STP-function', circle with square for 'Signalling point with both user function and STP-function', and triangle for 'Signalling point; irrelevant whether user function and/or STP-function is present'. The code T1156060-93/d01 is present. + +FIGURE 1/Q.700 +**Example of associated and quasi-associated signalling modes + and definition of signalling network graph symbols** + +A signalling point at which a message is received on one signalling link and is transferred to another link, i.e. neither the location of the source nor the receiving User Part function, is a Signal Transfer Point (STP). + +In the quasi-associated mode, the function of a signalling transfer point is typically located in a few signalling points which may be dedicated to this function, or may combine this function with some other (e.g. switching) function. A signalling point serving as a signalling transfer point functions as an originating and destination point for the messages generated and received by the level 3 function of the MTP also in cases when no user functions are present. + +## 2.4 Signalling routes + +The pre-determined path, consisting of a succession of signalling points/signalling transfer points and the interconnecting signalling links, that a message takes through the signalling network between the origination point and the destination point is the signalling route for that signalling relation. + +All the signalling routes that may be used between an originating point and a destination point by a message traversing the signalling network is the signalling route set for that signalling relation. + +## 2.5 Signalling network structure + +The signalling system may be used with different types of signalling network structures. The choice between different types of signalling network structures may be influenced by factors such as the structure of the telecommunication network to be served by the signalling system and administrative aspects. + +In the case when the provision of the signalling system is planned purely on a per signalling relation basis, the likely result is a signalling network largely based on associated signalling, typically supplemented by a limited degree of quasi-associated signalling for low volume signalling relations. The structure of such a signalling network is mainly determined by the patterns of the signalling relations. + +Another approach is to consider the signalling network as a common resource that should be planned according to the total needs for common channel signalling. The high capacity of digital signalling links in combination with the needs for redundancy for reliability then typically leads to a signalling network based on a high degree of quasi-associated signalling with some provision for associated signalling for high volume signalling relations. The latter approach to signalling network planning is more likely to allow exploitation of the potential of common channel signalling to support network features that require communication for purposes other than the switching of connections. + +The worldwide signalling network is structured into two functionally independent levels, namely the international and national levels. This structure makes possible a clear division of responsibility for signalling network management and allows numbering plans of signalling points of the international network and the different national networks to be independent of one another. + +Further considerations about the structure of the signalling network are given in Recommendation Q.705, and the impact on the message transfer part in Recommendation Q.701. + +## **3 SS No. 7 functional blocks** + +## **3.1 Basic functional division** + +The SS No. 7 comprises the following functional blocks: + +- Message Transfer Part (MTP) +- Telephone User Part (TUP) +- ISDN User Part (ISUP) +- Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) +- Transaction Capabilities (TC) +- Application-Entity (AE) (see Note) +- Application-Service-Elements (ASEs) (see Note) + +NOTE – The glossary shows these as hyphenated terms but the usual convention used in this Recommendation will be unhyphenated. + +The fundamental principle of the signalling system structure is the division of functions into a common Message Transfer Part (MTP) on one hand, and separate User Parts for different users on the other. This is illustrated in Figure 2. + +The overall function of the Message Transfer Part is to serve as a transport system providing reliable transfer of signalling messages between the locations of communicating user functions. + +User functions in SS No. 7 MTP terms are: + +- the ISDN User Part (ISUP) +- the Telephone User Part (TUP) +- the Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) +- the Data User Part (DUP) + +The term “User” in this context refers to any functional entity that utilises the transport capability provided by the Message Transfer Part. + +A User Part comprises those functions of, or related to, a particular type of user that are part of the common channel signalling system, typically because those functions need to be specified in a signalling context. + +The SCCP also has Users. These are: + +- the ISDN User Part (ISUP) +- Transaction Capabilities (TC) +- Operations Maintenance and Administration Part (OMAP) + +![Diagram of SS No. 7 Architecture showing layers 1-7 and functional blocks: TC user, Transaction Capabilities (TC), Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP), ISDN User Part (ISDN-UP), Telephone User Part (TUP), and MTP (Levels 1-3).](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture of SS No. 7, mapping its functional levels to the OSI Reference Model layers. On the left, a column lists the layers: 7, 4-6 (Null), 3, 2, and 1. Above the diagram, a box labeled 'Users of SS No. 7' spans across the top. Below it, the functional blocks are arranged as follows: + + +- Layer 7:** Contains 'TC user' and 'Transaction Capabilities (TC)'. +- Layers 4-6 (Null):** This section is empty, indicating no specific mapping for these layers. +- Layer 3:** Contains 'Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) (Level 4)'. To its right are two large boxes: 'ISDN User Part (ISDN-UP) (Level 4)' and 'Telephone User Part (TUP) (Level 4)'. An arrow labeled 'Others MTP users' points to the left from the SCCP box. +- Layers 2 and 1:** These are combined into a single box at the bottom labeled 'MTP (Levels 1-3)'. + + Lines connect the 'TC user' to 'Transaction Capabilities (TC)', which in turn connects to 'SCCP (Level 4)'. The 'SCCP (Level 4)' box connects to both the 'ISDN-UP (Level 4)' and 'TUP (Level 4)' boxes. All three (SCCP, ISDN-UP, and TUP) connect down to the 'MTP (Levels 1-3)' box at the bottom. + +Diagram of SS No. 7 Architecture showing layers 1-7 and functional blocks: TC user, Transaction Capabilities (TC), Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP), ISDN User Part (ISDN-UP), Telephone User Part (TUP), and MTP (Levels 1-3). + +T1 156070-93/d02 + +FIGURE 2/Q.700 +**Architecture of SS No. 7** + +## 3.2 SS No. 7 architecture + +### 3.2.1 General + +From the perspective of an end user, the service provided by a telecommunications network may be regarded as a Network Layer service. However, from a signalling network perspective, the service may be provided at a different layer/level. + +Figure 2 shows the Architecture of SS No. 7 and illustrates the functional relationship between the various functional blocks of the SS No. 7 and between the SS No. 7 levels and the OSI Reference Model Layers. This level/layer relationship is described in the following subclauses. + +The initial specification of SS No. 7 was based on circuit-related telephony control requirements. To meet these requirements, SS No. 7 was specified in four functional levels, the Message Transfer Part comprising levels 1-3, and the User Parts as level 4. + +Figure 3 shows the Functional Levels of SS No. 7. As new requirements have emerged, e.g. for non-circuit related information transfer, SS No. 7 has also evolved to meet these new requirements. There has been a need to align certain elements in SS No. 7 to the OSI 7 Layer Reference Model (see 4.2). + +### 3.2.2 Message Transfer Part (MTP) levels 1-3 + +An overview of the MTP is given in Recommendation Q.701. The MTP is defined in Recommendations Q.701-Q.704, Q.706 and Q.707. + +#### 3.2.2.1 Signalling data link functions (level 1) + +Level 1 defines the physical, electrical and functional characteristics of a signalling data link and the means to access it. The level 1 function provides a bearer for a signalling link. + +The detailed requirements for signalling data links are specified in Recommendation Q.702. + +![Diagram of SS No. 7 functional levels showing four layers: Level 4 (Users Parts: ISDN-UP, SCCP, TUP), Level 3 (Signalling network functions), Level 2 (Signalling link functions), and Level 1 (Signalling data link functions). Brackets on the right group Level 4 as 'Examples of Users Parts' and Levels 1-3 as the 'Message Transfer Part'. A reference code T1156080-93/d03 is at the bottom.](d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg) + +T1156080-93/d03 + +Diagram of SS No. 7 functional levels showing four layers: Level 4 (Users Parts: ISDN-UP, SCCP, TUP), Level 3 (Signalling network functions), Level 2 (Signalling link functions), and Level 1 (Signalling data link functions). Brackets on the right group Level 4 as 'Examples of Users Parts' and Levels 1-3 as the 'Message Transfer Part'. A reference code T1156080-93/d03 is at the bottom. + +FIGURE 3/Q.700 +SS No. 7 functional levels + +#### 3.2.2.2 Signalling link functions (level 2) + +Level 2 defines the functions and procedures for and relating to the transfer of signalling messages over one individual signalling data link. The level 2 functions together with a level 1 signalling data link as a bearer, and provides a signalling link for reliable transfer of signalling messages between two points. + +The detailed requirements for signalling functions are given in Recommendation Q.703. + +#### 3.2.2.3 Signalling network functions (level 3) + +Level 3 in principle defines those transport functions and procedures that are common to and independent of the operation of individual signalling links. These functions fall into two major categories: + +- a) *Signalling message handling functions* – These transfer the message to the proper signalling link or User Part. +- b) *Signalling network management functions* – These control the current message routing and configuration of the signalling network facilities and in the case of signalling network failures, control the reconfigurations and other actions to preserve or restore the normal message transfer capability. + +The detailed requirements for signalling network functions are given in Recommendation Q.704. + +### 3.2.3 Level 4: MTP User functions + +Level 4 consists of the different User Parts. Each User Part defines the functions and procedures of the signalling system that are particular to a certain type of user of the system. The following entities are defined as User Parts in SS No. 7. + +#### 3.2.3.1 Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) + +The SCCP is defined in Recommendations Q.711-Q.716. The SCCP provides additional functions to the Message Transfer Part to provide connectionless and connection-oriented network services to transfer circuit-related, and non-circuit-related signalling information. + +The SCCP provides the means to + +- control logical signalling connections in a SS 7 network; +- transfer Signalling Data Units across the SS 7 network with or without the use of logical signalling connections. + +SCCP provides a routing function which allows signalling messages to be routed to a signalling point based on, for example, dialled digits. This capability involves a translation function which translates the global title (e.g. dialled digits) into a signalling point code and a sub-system number. + +SCCP also provides a management function, which controls the availability of the "sub-systems", and broadcasts this information to other nodes in the network which have a need to know the status of the "sub-system". An SCCP sub-system is an SCCP User. + +#### **3.2.3.2 Telephone User Part (TUP)** + +The SS No. 7 Telephone User Part is defined in Recommendations Q.721-725. The TUP Recommendations define the international telephone call control signalling functions for use over SS No. 7. + +#### **3.2.3.3 Data User Part (DUP)** + +The Data User Part is referenced in Recommendation Q.741, and the functionality fully defined in Recommendation X.61. It defines the protocol to control interexchange circuits used on data calls, and data call facility registration and cancellation. + +#### **3.2.3.4 ISDN User Part (ISUP)** + +The ISDN User Part is defined in Recommendations Q.761-Q.764 and Q.766. This Recommendation Series deals with the basic services only. + +The ISUP encompasses signalling functions required to provide switched services and user facilities for voice and non-voice applications in the ISDN. + +The ISUP is also suited for application in dedicated telephone and circuit-switched data networks and in analogue, and mixed analogue/digital networks. + +The ISUP has an interface to the SCCP (which is also a level 4 User Part) to allow the ISUP to use the SCCP for end-to-end signalling. + +Supplementary Services handled by the SS No. 7 ISDN application are described in the Q.730-Series Recommendations. These supplementary services embody ISUP signalling messages and procedures. In some cases these services may include an application protocol which uses TC and SCCP. + +#### **3.2.3.5 Transaction Capabilities** + +Transaction Capabilities are defined in Recommendations Q.771-Q.775. + +TC provides the means to establish non-circuit-related communication between two nodes in the signalling network. + +#### **3.2.3.6 Applications** + +Applications are modelled in layer 7. They are the process which provide the end user of the telephone or ISDN network with the basic and supplementary telecommunication services. They comprise the users of TC. + +For details of the architecture of applications, see 3/Q.1400. + +## **4 OSI layering and SS No. 7** + +## **4.1 OSI Layering** + +The purpose of the Reference Model of Open Systems Interconnection for CCITT Applications (see Recommendation X.200) is to provide a well-defined structure for modelling the interconnection and exchange of information between users in a communications system. This approach allows standardized procedures to be defined not only to provide an open systems interconnection between users over a single network, but also to permit interworking between networks to allow communication between users over several networks in tandem. + +The approach taken in the OSI reference model is to partition the model used to describe this interconnection and exchange information between users in a communications system into seven layers. + +From the point of view of a particular layer, the lower layers provide a “transfer service” with specific features. The way in which a lower layer is realized is immaterial to the next higher layers. Correspondingly, the lower layers are not concerned with the meaning of the information coming from higher layers or the reasons for its transfer. + +The characteristics of each layer are described in 3a)/Q.1400 - 3g)/Q.1400. + +## 4.2 Relationship between SS No. 7 layering and the OSI model + +Evolution of the SS No. 7 architecture since the *Red Book* (1984) increasingly has been based on the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) reference Model (see 3). OSI considers primarily connection-oriented protocols, that is, protocols that establish a logical connection before transferring data. The Network Service Part (NSP) of SS 7 provides both connectionless and connection oriented protocols. + +The OSI layer 1-3 services are provided by the SCCP together with the MTP. The combination of the MTP and the SCCP is called the NSP. Layers 1-3 comprise functions for the transportation of information from one location to another, possibly via a number of communication links in tandem. These functions provide the basis on which a communication network can be built. + +There are no protocols currently used in the SS No. 7 architecture that map into layers 4-6. Protocols may be included in these layers in the future if the need for such services arises. + +Transaction Capabilities (TC) are defined as a protocol which directly accesses the connectionless SCCP services. + +Figure 2 shows the relationship between SCCP and TC, to the OSI 7 Layer Reference Model. Recommendation Q.1400 provides further information about this relationship. + +## 4.3 Primitive Interfaces between SS No. 7 Functions + +### 4.3.1 General + +Interfaces between the functional elements of SS No. 7 are specified using interface primitives. Primitive interface definition does not assume any specific implementation of a service. + +### 4.3.2 OSI service primitives + +Where the functional element of SS No. 7 is modelled on the OSI 7 layer reference model, e.g. SCCP, TC, service primitives are defined in line with Recommendation X.210. + +In line with Recommendation X.210, Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between the terms “service”, “boundary”, “service primitives”, “peer protocol” and “peer entities”. The term “boundary” applies to boundaries between layers, as well as to boundaries between sub-layers. + +#### 4.3.2.1 Service primitives + +The use of primitives as a modelling tool does not imply any specific implementation of a service in terms of interface primitives. + +Four types of service primitive are identified (see Figure 5): + +- request: A primitive issued by a service user to invoke a service element. +- indication: A primitive issued by a service provider to advise that a service element has been invoked by the service user at the peer service access point or by the service provider. +- response: A primitive issued by the service user to complete at a particular service access point some service element whose invocation has been previously indicated at that service access point. +- confirmation: A primitive issued by a service provider to complete at a particular service access point some service element previously invoked by a request at that service access point. + +Not all four types of service primitives have to be associated with all services. + +![Diagram illustrating the types of service primitives between an upper boundary, a lower boundary, and two peer entities (d). Arrows labeled 'a' (Service) and 'b' (Service primitive) point between the boundaries and the entities. Arrows labeled 'c' (Peer protocol) point between the two peer entities.](bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two peer entities, each represented by a rectangle labeled 'd'. Above each entity is a horizontal line labeled 'Upper boundary', and below each is a horizontal line labeled 'Lower boundary'. Vertical arrows labeled 'a' (Service) point from the upper boundary to the entity and from the entity to the lower boundary. Vertical arrows labeled 'b' (Service primitive) point from the lower boundary to the entity and from the entity to the upper boundary. A horizontal double-headed arrow labeled 'c' (Peer protocol) connects the two peer entities. The text 'T1156090-93/d04' is located at the bottom right. + +Diagram illustrating the types of service primitives between an upper boundary, a lower boundary, and two peer entities (d). Arrows labeled 'a' (Service) and 'b' (Service primitive) point between the boundaries and the entities. Arrows labeled 'c' (Peer protocol) point between the two peer entities. + +- a Service +- b Service primitive +- c Peer protocol +- d Peer entities + +FIGURE 4/Q.700 +Types of service primitives + +![Diagram illustrating service primitives between a service user and a service provider. Arrows labeled 'Request', 'Response', 'Confirmation', and 'Indication' show the flow of primitives between the user and provider.](75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two 'Service user' boxes at the top, each connected to a 'Service provider' box below it. Between the two service providers is a horizontal line. Arrows show the flow of primitives: 'Request' from the left service user to the left service provider; 'Response' from the left service provider to the right service provider; 'Confirmation' from the right service provider to the right service user; and 'Indication' from the right service user to the right service provider. The text 'T1156100-93/d05' is located at the bottom right. + +Diagram illustrating service primitives between a service user and a service provider. Arrows labeled 'Request', 'Response', 'Confirmation', and 'Indication' show the flow of primitives between the user and provider. + +FIGURE 5/Q.700 +Types of service primitives + +## 5 Addressing + +Addressing of SS No. 7 messages has to be considered on a number of levels. For example, the message transfer part uses the destination point code to route the message to the appropriate signalling point. The TUP called party address field, or ISUP called party number field, in an Initial Address Message is used to route the call to the appropriate called destination. The capabilities of the various SS No. 7 addressing mechanisms are illustrated by the signalling message structure. + +## 5.1 Signalling message structure + +A signalling message is an assembly of information, defined at level 3 or 4, pertaining to a call, management transaction, etc., that is transferred as an entity by the message transfer function. + +Each message contains service information including a service indicator identifying the source User Part and possibly additional information such as an indication whether the message relates to international or national application of the User Part. + +The signalling information of the message includes the actual user information, such as one or more ISDN telephone or data call control signals, management and maintenance information, etc., and information identifying the type and format of the message. It also includes a label that provides information enabling the message to be + +- Routed by the level 3 functions through a signalling network to its destination. (This part of the label is known as the Routing label. This is shown in Figure 6.) +- Directed at the receiving User Part to the particular circuit, call, management or other transaction to which the message is related. + +Further details are given in 5.2. + +| | | | +|-----|------------------------|------------------------| +| SLS | Originating Point Code | Destination Point Code | +|-----|------------------------|------------------------| + +FIGURE 6/Q.700 + +### SS No. 7 Routing Label + +There are four types of label: + +- type A for MTP management messages; +- type B for TUP; +- type C for ISUP (circuit related) messages; +- type D for SCCP messages. + +These are shown in Figure 7. + +The circuit identification code is used as a label for circuit related signalling messages, e.g. TUP or ISUP. The least significant 4 bits of this field (in the TUP) is the Signalling Link Selection (SLS) field, which is used, where appropriate, to perform load sharing (see Recommendation Q.704). In the ISUP, the SLS is a separate field to the circuit identification code. + +The SS No. 7 MTP signalling messages at level 2, which carry user information, are called Message Signal Units (MSUs). Figure 8 shows the basic format of the MSU (refer also to Recommendation Q.703) and the breakdown of the MSU. The Signalling Information Field (SIF) is used to carry level 3 or level 4 messages that may be circuit-related (e.g. ISUP, TUP messages) or non-circuit-related (e.g. SCCP). Further details are given on message formats in Recommendations Q.704, Q.713, Q.723, Q.763 and Q.773. + +## 5.2 MTP addressing + +There is a two part addressing mechanism in the MTP, one part of the mechanism uses the point code which is incorporated in the routing label of every message signal unit, the other part of the mechanism makes use of the service indicator and network indicator within the service information octet. + +![A bracket grouping the last three columns of the tables (SLS, Originating point code, and Destination point code) and labeled 'Routing label'.](8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg) + +MTP management messages: Label type A + +| | | | | +|------------------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| +| Management information | SLC | Originating point code | Destination point code | +|------------------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| + +TUP messages: Label type B + +| | | | | +|------------------------|-----------------|------------------------|------------------------| +| Signalling information | Circuit ID code | Originating point code | Destination point code | +| | SLS | | | + +ISUP messages: Label type C + +| | | | | | +|------------------------|-----------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| +| Signalling information | Circuit ID code | SLS | Originating point code | Destination point code | +|------------------------|-----------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| + +SCCP messages: Label type D + +| | | | | +|------------------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| +| Signalling information | SLS | Originating point code | Destination point code | +|------------------------|-----|------------------------|------------------------| + +Routing label + +T1156110-93/d06 + +A bracket grouping the last three columns of the tables (SLS, Originating point code, and Destination point code) and labeled 'Routing label'. + +FIGURE 7/Q.700 +**SS No. 7 message label types** + +### 5.2.1 Point codes + +Every signalling point (SP) and signalling transfer point (STP), when integrated in an SP, will be allocated its own unique point code. This is used by the MTP routing function to direct outgoing messages towards their destination in the network as indicated by the inclusion of the appropriate point code in the routing label. This point code is known as the destination point code (DPC). The routing label also contains the point code of the SP originating the message signal unit, therefore, the combination of this originating point code (OPC) and DPC will determine the signalling relation (i.e. the network points between which MTP “User” information is exchanged). The DPC is used by the receiving SP/STP discrimination function to determine whether the message is addressed to that SP or requires to be onward routed by means of the signal transfer capability of the STP. + +The DPC will always be determined and inserted in the routing label by the level 4 MTP “User”. This will also generally be the same for the OPC but it is possible that since the OPC might be constant it could be inserted by the MTP. + +### 5.2.2 Service indicator and network indicator + +The 4-bit service indicator (SI) and 2-bit network indicator (NI) are included in the service information octet (SIO) and are used within an SP’s distribution function to determine the “User” the incoming message should be delivered to. + +The SI will determine the “User”, e.g. TUP, SCCP, ISUP and the NI will determine which network is concerned, e.g. international or national. + +The NI will also in conjunction with the OPC/DPC determine whether a national or international signalling relation/routing is involved. + +The NI, together with the standard 14-bit point code, allows for four signalling networks each with up to 16 384 point codes. + +![Diagram of SS No. 7 signalling message structure showing layers MTP, TUP, ISUP, SCCP, and TCAP with their respective fields and bit sequences.](76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the structure of an SS No. 7 signalling message across five layers: + +- MTP (Message Transfer Part):** Consists of a sequence of fields: F, CK, SIF, SIO, LI, FIB, FSN, BIB, BSN, and F. An arrow points to the start of the F field, labeled "First bit transmitted". +- TUP (Telephone User Part):** Contains "TUP Message information elements", "H1 Message type", "H0 Message group", and "Label B". +- ISUP (ISDN User Part):** Contains "ISUP Message information elements", "Message type", and "Label C". +- SCCP (Signalling Connection Control Part):** Contains "EOP User message/data", "SCCP Message header", "Message type", and "Label D". A callout box for the "SCCP Message header" indicates it "Includes called and calling party addresses and local references a)". +- TCAP (Transaction Capabilities Application Part):** Divided into "Component portion" (containing "Component n", "Component 2", and "Component 1") and "Transaction portion". + +T1156120-93/d07 + +Diagram of SS No. 7 signalling message structure showing layers MTP, TUP, ISUP, SCCP, and TCAP with their respective fields and bit sequences. + +a) CO only. + +BIB Backward indicator bit + BSN Backward sequence number + CK Check bits + F Flag + FIB Forward indicator bit + FSN Forward sequence number + LI Length indicator + SF Status field + SIF Signalling information field + SIO Service information octet + +FIGURE 8/Q.700 +**SS No. 7 signalling message structure** + +## 5.3 SCCP addressing + +Addressing within the SCCP of SS No. 7 makes use of three separate elements: + +- DPC; +- Global Title (GT); +- Sub-System Number (SSN); + +One, two or all of the elements may be present in the Called and Calling Party Address, the main options are: + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| GT
DPC + SSN | When transferring SCCP messages | +| SSN
GT
SSN + GT | When receiving messages from MTP | +| DPC
DPC + (SSN or GT or both)
GT
GT + SSN | When receiving messages from connectionless or connection-oriented control for SCCP routing | + +The form of address used will depend on the service, application and underlying network. + +### 5.3.1 Global Title (GT) + +The Global Title (GT) may comprise of dialled digits or another form of address that will not be recognized in the SS No. 7 network. Therefore, if the associated message requires to be routed over the SS No. 7 network, translation is required. + +Translation of the GT will result in a DPC being produced and possibly also a new SSN and GT. A field is also included in the address indicator to identify the format of the global title. + +### 5.3.2 Destination Point Code (DPC) + +The DPC in an address requires no translation and will merely determine if the message is destined for that SP (incoming message) or requires to be routed over the SS No. 7 signalling network via the MTP. For outgoing messages this DPC should be inserted in the MTP routing label. + +### 5.3.3 Sub-system Number (SSN) + +The SSN will identify a sub-system accessed via the SCCP within a node and may be a User Part, e.g. ISUP, SCCP management or an AE via TC. TC, however, will be invisible to the SCCP. + +When examination of the DPC in an incoming message has determined that the message is for that SP, examination of the SSN will identify the concerned SCCP "User". The presence of an SSN without a DPC will also indicate a message which is addressed to that SP. + +The SSN field has an initial capacity of 255 codes with an extension code for future requirements. + +## 5.4 User Part addressing + +### 5.4.1 Telephone User Part addressing + +The Telephone User Part is capable of handling E.164 (incorporating E.163) addresses in the calling and called party address information elements. + +### 5.4.2 ISDN User Part addressing + +The ISDN User Part address structure is capable of handling E.164 addresses in the calling and called number, and redirecting address information elements. + +### **5.4.3 Signalling connection control part addresses** + +The signalling connection control part is capable of handling E.164 (incorporating E.163), X.121, F.69, E.210, E.211, E.212, E.213 addresses, and the mobile hybrid E.214 address in the calling and called party address information elements. + +The handling of OSI NSAP addresses in SCCP is described in Recommendation Q.711 and 3.2/Q.1400. + +### **5.5 Labelling** + +A variety of methods to label signalling messages is used to allow the signalling system and users of the signalling system to relate a received message to a particular call or transaction. + +For circuit-related messages, (e.g. on a simple telephone call), the TUP (and the ISUP) use the circuit identification code (CIC) to label the message. + +For certain ISUP procedures, call references are used to associate messages with calls. + +SCCP also uses local references on connection-oriented protocols. + +Transaction capabilities use transaction identities and invoke identities to associate transaction messages and components respectively. + +## **6 Operations administration and maintenance** + +## **6.1 Management** + +Management within SS No. 7 is partitioned into two main areas: + +- Signalling network management; +- Signalling system management. + +### **6.1.1 Signalling network management** + +These are functions contained within the MTP and SCCP which, by means of automatic procedures, maintain the required signalling network performance (e.g. changeover of faulty links, forced re-routing, sub-system availability, etc.). + +### **6.1.2 Signalling system management** + +This may be considered as the actions taken by the operator (or by an external automatic mechanism) such as TMN-OS via the Q3 interface to maintain the signalling system performance when problems are identified. + +## **6.2 Maintenance and testing** + +Some of the maintenance, administration and management functions of the signalling system themselves use the signalling system as a data carrying mechanism. + +Testing within SS No. 7 is: + +- initiated automatically as a part of a signalling system management procedures (e.g. signalling route set test in MTP); or +- applied as a result of external activity, e.g. man-machine interface (MMI) or TMN. + +The first form is described in the appropriate Q.7xx Recommendation dealing with MTP or SCCP, etc. The second form includes some MMI or TMN initiated procedures [initiation of MRVT (Recommendation Q.753)], and also pre-in service testing using test cases specified in Recommendations for SS No. 7 tests (Q.78x-Series). + +### **6.2.1 Operations Maintenance and Administration Part (OMAP)** + +Recommendation Q.75x provides procedures and protocols related to operations, maintenance and administration. + +OMAP is situated in the TMN-OS as well as in SS No. 7 SPs of all kinds, OMAP functions include measurement initiation and collection as well as initiation of tests within the SS No. 7 network like MRVT. + +### **6.2.2 Testing** + +Test specifications for SS No. 7 are contained in Q.78x-Series Recommendations and cover MTP level 2, MTP level 3, TUP, ISUP, SCCP and TCAP together with an overview of testing. + +## **6.3 SS No. 7 measurements** + +Recommendation Q.752 specifies the monitoring and measurements appropriate to the MTP, SCCP, ISUP and TCAP. + +## **7 Signalling system performance** + +The performance requirements of SS No. 7 must take account of the performance requirements of the services that are being supported. Each functional component of SS No. 7 has its performance criteria specified in a self-contained Recommendation. An overall performance target is specified in the form of a Hypothetical Signalling Reference Connection (HSRC). + +## **7.1 Hypothetical Signalling Reference Connection (HSRC)** + +The HSRC for SS No. 7 (Recommendation Q.709), identifies components that are used in a signalling relation between signalling end points, signalling points, signalling transfer points, and signalling points with SCCP relay functions, and gives the values for the signalling delays and unavailability parameters. The values used are derived from the figures contained in the individual performance Recommendations for MTP, TUP, SCCP and ISUP. Service performance Recommendations E.721 and I.352 also apply. + +## **7.2 MTP** + +The MTP signalling performance requirements are specified in Recommendation Q.706. This Recommendation includes + +- the parameters for route-set unavailability, MTP malfunction (loss of messages and mis-sequencing), and message transfer times; +- factors affecting performance, for example signalling traffic characteristics (e.g. message sizes, loading potential, security, etc.) and parameters related to transmission characteristics (e.g. bit rates of signalling data links, propagation delays); +- those parameters which have greatest influence on the signalling network queueing delays for example, error control, security arrangements, failures and priorities. + +It should be noted that some functions may affect MTP performance. + +## **7.3 SCCP** + +The SCCP signalling performance requirements are contained in Recommendation Q.716. Parameters identified are signalling connection delays (establishment, unsolicited reset, reset and release signal connection, reset and release failure probability, data message transmit delay, data message delay failure and error probability and SCCP unavailability). + +It should be noted that management functions affect SCCP performance. + +## **7.4 TUP** + +The TUP signalling performance requirements are contained in Recommendation Q.725. Parameters contained in this Recommendation are cross-office performance for TUP supported circuit connection control under normal and abnormal traffic loads. Also specified is the probability of failure of calls due to signalling malfunction. + +## **7.5 ISUP** + +The ISUP signalling performance requirements are contained in Recommendation Q.766. Parameters contained in this Recommendation are cross-office performance for ISUP supported circuit connection control under normal and abnormal traffic loads. Also specified is the probability of failure of an ISDN call due to signalling function. + +## **8 Flow control** + +SS No. 7, in common with other transport mechanisms, needs to limit the input of data when congestion onset is detected. The nature of SS No. 7 will lead to SP/STP overload congestion being spread through the signalling network if no action is taken. This will result in impaired signalling performance and message loss. In addition to signalling network congestion within a node, congestion will also require action to prevent signalling performance from deteriorating. There is thus a need for flow control within the signalling system to maintain the required signalling performance. + +## **8.1 Signalling network flow control** + +This is achieved by incorporating a flow control mechanism in the MTP. On detection of congestion, MTP "Users Parts" are informed by the means of a primitive. The "User Part" should then reduce signalling traffic towards the congested part of the network. If the User is at a remote SP, the information is carried across the network in an appropriate signalling network management message. + +## **8.2 Signalling node (congestion) flow control** + +In addition to network congestion, nodal congestion also requires the remedial action of flow control to prevent the signalling performance from being impaired. Nodal congestion can occur both within the MTP and the MTP "User Part". + +### **8.2.1 MTP nodal flow control** + +If MTP node overload is detected similar action to that used to combat signalling network congestion is required. On detection of that overload, the "User Parts" are informed so that traffic can be reduced. + +### **8.2.2 "User Part" flow control** + +As well as taking action to reduce MTP congestion, mechanisms are also required within each User Part to detect the onset of congestion and to take appropriate action. + +The ISUP and TUP provide signalling procedures which aim to reduce the new calls offered to an exchange which is experiencing processor overload. + +Automatic congestion control provides the means to inform adjacent exchanges of the current workload, and to request that only priority calls are offered to the exchange experiencing overload. + +## **9 Compatibility mechanisms and rules in SS No. 7** + +## **9.1 Background** + +The wide scope of the signalling system requires that the total system include a large diversity of functions and that further functions can be added to cater for extended future applications. As a consequence only a subset of the total system may need to be used in an individual application. + +A major characteristic of the signalling system is that it is specified with a functional structure to ensure flexibility and modularity for diverse applications within one system concept. This allows the system to be realized as a number of functional modules which could ease adaptation of the functional content of an operating SS No. 7 to the requirements of particular applications. + +The CCITT specifications of the signalling system specify functions and their use for international operation of the system. Many of those functions are also required in typical national applications. Furthermore, the system to some extent includes features that are particular to national applications. The CCITT specifications thus form an internationally standardized base for a wide range of national applications of common channel signalling. + +SS No. 7 is a common channel signalling system. However, as a consequence of its modularity and its intended use as a standard base for national applications the system may be applied in many forms. In general, to define the use of the system in a given national application, a selection of the CCITT specified functions must be made and the necessary additional national functions must be specified depending on the nature of the application. + +SS No. 7 is an evolutionary signalling system which has undergone a number of enhancements. To allow ease of evolution it has been necessary to incorporate a number of compatibility mechanisms in various functional elements of SS No. 7, and to apply a number of compatibility rules to protocol enhancement. Detailed specification of the compatibility mechanisms in each functional element of SS No. 7 are given in the appropriate Q.7xx Recommendation. + +Compatibility rules which apply to all functional elements of SS No. 7 are detailed in the following text. + +## **9.2 Evolutionary requirements** + +In application protocols (e.g. ISUP, ASEs), the main evolutionary requirement is the ability to add new subscriber services, and new administration and network services to the protocol. + +In the SCCP and MTP, the evolutionary requirements are different in that initial versions provide basic transport functions which are generally stable. The main enhancements have been in the management aspects of protocols. + +Although the evolutionary requirements are different across the elements of SS No. 7, it is possible to incorporate certain common mechanisms in the various functional elements. + +## **9.3 Forward and backward compatibility** + +Compatibility mechanisms can be considered as being either + +- forward compatibility mechanisms; or +- backward compatibility rules. + +Forward compatibility mechanisms are defined as a scheme to enable a version of a protocol to communicate effectively and interwork with future versions of the protocol. That is, a version of a protocol should not restrict future protocols from providing extra capabilities. + +Backward compatibility rules are defined as a scheme to ensure that future versions of the protocol will be able to send protocol messages to the previous version which will be understood and fully processed by the node supporting the previous version. That is, future versions of a protocol must allow earlier versions to operate with it and not reduce the earlier versions' service level. + +## **9.4 Compatibility rules for SS No. 7** + +Compatibility rules for SS No. 7 protocol evolution are contained in 9/Q.1400. + +Note that the 1992 ISUP Recommendations (Q.76x-Series Recommendations) contain a special compatibility procedure. It uses an instruction indicator, which includes information about the handling of a parameter or message that is not recognized (e.g. discard, pass-on, send Confusion). It is sent with every new message or parameter. For parameters + +containing new values, it is assumed that the instruction indicator for the whole parameter can be used for all values within the parameter. For existing messages, parameters and parameter values, the required action if unrecognized information is received is given in tabular form. + +# 10 Glossary + +A Glossary of terms in SS No. 7 is contained at the back of the Fascicles VI.7, VI.8 and VI.9 of the *Blue Book*. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10fd0a81be66e358f00bca75bbd7c0c221885146 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.721-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + +![ITU logo](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a lightning bolt superimposed on it, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font. + +ITU logo + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.721** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7** + +--- + +**FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE +SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 TELEPHONE +USER PART (TUP)** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.721** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation Q.721 was published in Fascicle VI.8 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# **FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 TELEPHONE USER PART (TUP)** + +### **1 General** + +Use of Signalling System No. 7 for telephone call control signalling requires: + +- application of *Telephone User Part* (TUP) functions, in combination with +- application of an appropriate set of *Message Transfer Part* (MTP) functions. + +A general description of the signalling system and the division of functions between the Message Transfer Part and the Telephone User Part are presented in Recommendation Q.700 and the requirements of interaction between those two parts are contained in Recommendation Q.701. + +## **2 Telephone User Part** + +The Telephone User Part specified in these specifications defines the necessary telephone signalling functions for use of Signalling System No. 7 for international telephone call control signalling. It is specified with the aim of providing the same features for telephone signalling as other CCITT telephone signalling systems. + +Signalling System No. 7 can be used to control the switching of all types of international circuits to be used in a worldwide connection, including circuits with speech interpolation and satellite circuits. + +The system meets all requirements defined by the CCITT concerning the service features for worldwide international semiautomatic and automatic telephone traffic. It is designed for the bothway operation of speech circuits. + +When used with homogeneous digital telephone circuits the continuity of these circuits is ensured by the means for transmission quality supervision and failure detection that are inherent in the digital systems providing these circuits. However, the system includes means for link-by-link assurance of continuity check of the speech path when used with analogue telephone circuits and/or digital circuits including certain types of equipment, where fault indications are lost, e.g., circuit multiplication equipment. + +The signalling system is suitable for national telephone applications. Most telephone signalling message types and signals specified for international use are also required in typical national applications. In addition to these, national applications typically require additional signalling message types and signals, the system provides ample spare capacity for such additions. + +The standard label structure specified for telephone signalling messages requires that all exchanges using the signalling system are allocated codes from code plans established for the purpose of unambiguous identification of signalling points. The principles to apply to the international signalling network are specified in Recommendation Q.708. + +## **3 Message Transfer Part** + +The Message Transfer Part of Signalling System No. 7 is specified in Recommendations Q.701 to Q.709. An overview description of the Message Transfer Part is contained in Recommendation Q.701. + +The Message Transfer Part defines a range of functions by which different signalling modes and different signalling network configurations may be realized. Any application of Signalling System No. 7 requires that an appropriate selection of these functions is applied depending on the intended use of the system and the characteristics of the telecommunications network concerned. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..865f8b55e041d643e5cbbbaf817242a5fbfddeee --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:28b5629e15b67e8b4595b0f4ab84d4f7f21038abe2358e3b819b8d1d1bb9cedb +size 48164 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0680668711d9e6f2e62ee524267f2b1ce3c220c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74896c578401404d0e10939f42bbe4e148861659f60b537258d5ad368fc1c697 +size 38635 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/0f8fb3b7a1e75cf26017f79a1bfa8f67_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/0f8fb3b7a1e75cf26017f79a1bfa8f67_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6b747a792c97aba9b334ae72818fd991993dbeb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/0f8fb3b7a1e75cf26017f79a1bfa8f67_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9d683c229a15855d7758d2fcb47fe36dc76033b6b7e2f38115b67f862de2211c +size 32834 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..87033333e647c48ec4c0d3a07cd90abf2dbaef34 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6a6d249d9bbe8320a91c2476d11c8c3256622b5d3999b3282011dd1efa4c9b55 +size 31088 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ed56a2df3fe204cbf7e27fcdca17c7b2debf4e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/14252bcd35912bd656e98b16b2ee51c0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0c96e75d1daaea586444f38dbc9b14fc8977348c6edcc590e26c204b3a544b54 +size 39071 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a535259499ddd06764b055349b396494294bedc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/145d00f59802048185303f15937ea65c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8bc250fcf4b069d6ebc66c187a3bafa9ce0576dc20c737e68017a5f5e9252bae +size 48062 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3af12b01c6a760c34b612e2ccac4db7acd38151 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d599e40bed4e073d38ca04ee96fb86c86a4a2f6f716435accb49733b5231de54 +size 34482 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab2cbdd4af6bc1ea9ffa8cca87f9d455eb147008 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:94ee226724314e8b36ac3c73e99f9ed2a4fbb4786e0c7f3f43c1debd5966aa00 +size 8239 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e42d36dfd33edee8c9e653ffeb7d0f69a2ba535a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8869bbb2e006c4c5bbfdff5d724ba6dd24f64f27a66bc90c720c96a7b7b02e9f +size 36861 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f36968a09f7bc0adca041baf8a982d727ff016d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/3e2a8dc8c5537dbe703cdcb0e21e4e1b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e1fb0fb1328a8fa13e5c7f4537901216bb7f8c4a58de21031da6320554f496e7 +size 50004 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5c61d922c9d59296937b1310019f5d91f8b4e4b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74e5044aa7e7c2c61bdd95f0f8835be861a93bb170f54a2c74d350e5cf7258d0 +size 40069 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/4ab0be532558484d774d4efef9c94a56_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/4ab0be532558484d774d4efef9c94a56_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b98c110f54c3738d1306f3fc6a08fb8797e6b44 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/4ab0be532558484d774d4efef9c94a56_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6b05dfa10c4ae7726e2c7a1d05bd14c8938b297df8b45aaa6792adc11a3fe8a1 +size 6952 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/55136bc716146672fc680fa05989f1d2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/55136bc716146672fc680fa05989f1d2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c7652044f64761d13869b11d1e6b97f24088624 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/55136bc716146672fc680fa05989f1d2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b7cfc0270d020e49cb8e59173f1d680a615594a0792a42a3cb943bdbfaa61d5f +size 30539 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ad9cfe04d2a0f3e1361c4d436d741535b8fe84d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cee386d2cdbbbff12c7eba653ad6e1b8254abf2e43a3011c93e0c44dcfc49327 +size 44440 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c29810b86c7fdc1dce52202605381496c2bdb87d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5d396fc17057ad32c14f27c975ec485ade5a3dd7e68b51639a3f215ff4c6b595 +size 39442 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..376780014d155324c442d01519004fd5514f92bc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/6e15fc9ea763541c5913d26f85072ae1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ae4aec3cd0b88d40a1060364290d27292f814e9e4a5771ac5e790ee1f62cdff7 +size 53115 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ae3f22e882952b3a26ce32594df623a70e40a5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:54dcb5bdf69367f873f4d49a8da6467ad193adebf826a3f5f95db0d2b8192798 +size 40455 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab91db0e20879e126b3a143811aed0a27e45abd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:da633dd4d5e56815366bfff2883c5d40b0bd1536e838b011f5679e9ff49ae5a2 +size 48951 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb7ff23b6283d41f4b94bfde8e9b7a11bac0453e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c3f45cc07c0ee2babce4a37f6aaf92b610a80bd36974bcd8b2cc0d29f63709c5 +size 51906 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3878c3b718781113536e600e8e4c2aff321c157 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f8d06c8574ff3d7423de4270a67b67a5053b41a612d5e1db6006bf3b24c8bc99 +size 20761 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaed250da298ed4e52ed7d9148e99641172dbe42 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7620cd11969d1e6f86ec5269aa854f4bbff1650363000f73744e17cc6e7cb1a6 +size 41381 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/9f6dec4d4e9fde40bce018861ef1278e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/9f6dec4d4e9fde40bce018861ef1278e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..40d264542c9d430a6c565f82b0241ddbad2786ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/9f6dec4d4e9fde40bce018861ef1278e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3831c050436d870cad9ea5d64f65abe0860a9bb998b84d3e51257c7b50f873da +size 43313 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b2666e43ca7afc60f51cc7b8e90e804d84e90ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0a43caa18f313ffe7acb450dfe82e135feb1c702987cf9dacc050b1b4a0230ac +size 31940 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c01c808016057f44af994ae7e46500b42e5a0c1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2c653cb5ae0228509ec7f1b599f2635da5c3512cc19c8af4fa82379c0d785799 +size 31060 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/b51423b6c049f5b5fcde42e50b58f18b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/b51423b6c049f5b5fcde42e50b58f18b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3b8352db275ade1257e273530dfda0bf29ba1ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/b51423b6c049f5b5fcde42e50b58f18b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a817051faa395db092ca22b3376420490e9d1b5008a98d33b94d93382f48f327 +size 51808 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..863b81d6bd9eb4af236ec900bf28b8bc7e069260 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a034b9b468665f644e6bb239826e73944fa6c770f6c3b363ef62129f4790fe31 +size 42402 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad54c89f61f5e4bf3a806f51216f011b543c1c7c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/dcf37c460c66ec011dbe6ca08de44ff9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:304bd4dd6f5547d4ce06e7b254157f036f16937a29a295770b8ba336e5fe6a67 +size 40067 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea84b5fe53e9edd8c9e3f2cab8f8a793907cb61b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a9db74be06ae764ab1d205f95ab3692f9d0d2d1b78db0e8448d7dca0ba29baf3 +size 52568 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e99a5f053e541d0c405584a8ac960660ddc03f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0df5a1cdeec9b118473d325933375eee692e3a956d041cc8359b7847f27a3b60 +size 48623 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e90987faabad6a6665cd8ed1151dc474_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e90987faabad6a6665cd8ed1151dc474_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..907dcce0af845b7b517846ebf041c282763235de --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/e90987faabad6a6665cd8ed1151dc474_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f66a3ff27a56ac9828f70d87ab48b33147fbf7d7152fd1519c86aedc7fdd4107 +size 42305 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d440242a07eb94836e14e67eb79374fe015904c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:82a99a826605a49988e555ffe2d741d23fbe3991d96b3a6a995ec4dc348c8cfd +size 42888 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1be5c3c9634462dd20a2ac28a7d51cba2df82c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bdf6a2e25abecabb4f98e5a8e6c5dd6d7cc4212c519c762014da88f550abd50f +size 39215 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f9c189313638b63e92a4de04fee62dcdca0fc74 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:370ad47771e66963c42309c2a42dee6955a8e6413d9b9728fff34480995c705f +size 57340 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cea7e8d047bb7fdf58882f1866eeff5c123ad1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8d9b601f4f8627d57eb856ee30c1b6d432648001f83b132f5bbc3b794e432e6d +size 32396 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8411da43f1fdf6a4a77780c41f6b0802d3c5a7e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.2-199912-I_PDF-E/fcbc3c31776721edc98ceb1944ec438f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e80286b6e40ade6eaf24f0e6e595f4a1d65e437f3cf1811f7e799158008a5e59 +size 34397 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e6d6e8621c9c690dc6071b0fea4362cd0f5663d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2644aa3181cae7345351f104e9108673283d395178344155445573eaa9ebcf49 +size 168792 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ef217a35c606f996aec24fcc6d998d1acd256f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:247ac7e691d9b397de6c25536f4e75ec7745dc147c743ea9971188d8020f638a +size 8239 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbd3ad91d52d6d70c75076bea310c44a81a5cbdd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2b5886491099526c6d05a934ef5b89b38e1c48712b687937cd5d9824a928387 +size 86819 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..afd4366651c02afbb40d8601c1276eadbed57780 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9c9e98f65f79307c91e55ac8f17e23adf8273a5ea1042ea548a68064c1e81128 +size 78617 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c33f07b4f3125eb2b741edeb5d65f7b9ce6967f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7bd7950169a01cb8d810a59d2910f14482d83bc4f49b0fc5a4f16a54ccacc7a7 +size 96984 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c036e2540a94b31357ceb0002f0cacab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c036e2540a94b31357ceb0002f0cacab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3fa034b64bd84f88b98f6cfad4df5f5feed7f2a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c036e2540a94b31357ceb0002f0cacab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:86425734788b6d86d315634a668aa5c80568662f47cad083aed89d19760976c6 +size 8517 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..828e5b8267458193ca330321e8eb535361291e09 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7a43ecfb3373fcd8442ce471513d486db24fe6af6497f17dc536f71bee66963b +size 79158 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e064a589cb8158ae2ffe0b09815d0d2f0d335954 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.732.7-199607-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:981978f6e5162080fde136c8fab4e921c51b1812afcc0558ff14cdaf1a043413 +size 46743 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fbcd44f78fe6a2602bf336d748ee96368cdbd643 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e100d0fd4131b34a4a24cec0c3a56d3908b23e1fd2cf5825655b25c57148ea6e +size 8220 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb80fa87d4b61635a0d764fe226ad40466f0b2e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8307f6b04df072c9332f9987e034272c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:61cc9fe7e950e6bf47fddb63f05af6ec8729af81019578773bb1560893db4bfb +size 63574 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dcf1d25ae2dfc8d8f1c1b77b6fff56d42da859fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9d52cf65864aac0920d55dc817fd54629787224716e36d0f5815413d9a31e450 +size 47333 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55bf825724d6551addab65446f48564abbb4000d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/c2fc2621e8206d24427b56bcb2398fc0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a66d4bda7386526608dceaab2e1c7c9ebead79bd597717f6184878a160974639 +size 67865 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93d0d1e6a1ccbfa607acf41ed8e8e89c072341ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.733.2-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f462aeff28ee72b83c1b9f58052be4dc451e2bd639badedf533f5480030047e3 +size 53842 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99f7283bdb5f26275ad232c1753b3f1ed790fe2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c658328e03821bf4d10ed875941f8b0c2987a826db877759e1bce07c8696fd2b +size 8271 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fe34da4dbd0f1e7de996f897b50a407e2d6ac9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2953c8b4b298eb7cf5a08b74a2878d207ad1dc89a7be39ea547b3828b2b6021a +size 171948 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..adf7ab63b7b67071c686ef92ea61493416e03966 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:63a85581e6a40b5be401aeb728ca9504d256ddf9a86c356a89fa6c511a6a8b6c +size 193448 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..080aa65add661d83fc4382d70658dd160c7ed1ae --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7d5b3bf16ffb4fa334e83792b77c96af4e5b7db2d8c85c93e01918a8cabd4923 +size 148689 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddc7c154f482d26e7b32e06058170f8b5603621a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5e878113469d99532bdbd977785a165cb6cce4c37eb45161215e55d0160da521 +size 147438 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02ebf9ce9f4a811219fd780dfdca33eb239d4764 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b39d0ea4d87386116b6f04b50f0493864d3f61cc69b453a56c37eb388a9d7637 +size 178283 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e99947aee613d353926c2b7a26c41b38439d2578 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e6af4d69630d64648c45e8b840925682595bf0279a9106447cfde71860c9aa4a +size 216397 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96d43e01ba4721d064fd17bc06ee75b47cc2b6ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9978c7dc33fa2855774eafd9a6a37d8895f0aca77d24bcf8ecd9f80e35a94f11 +size 118163 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c4b29d20c363fe65323285ebea85f71744a781b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e41f76648edde409431695aec9cd1476582842b0b787a4a8970fe2022c207ac6 +size 128335 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..81a2f5233eb8ecc5dd1e37c281e7dbb7bddd8cee --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5fef604f61104f8914b69ac4d2c673f8edfee57d7dd87eb82755e91288c1d8df +size 128947 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae9c8e4b19bbaf4f1b6f2b65b1110d964d13ae83 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d3f82d20a47932b92767fb24f9b2f1587e667608ae0a5e5c817748a389774e89 +size 203494 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b19f243f752385c213e8ba214e97d7823e1f8cff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f31fcd939b1e79bf14e313c48042edaa910af5538c0aa091e335612ed9d43097 +size 107253 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da73e83d1409a1a9421013d7901b818d7b6ce426 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e979d1a048f60d134404bb8df0cf0992a7ee30261a8768217e2058a2f590bd9d +size 183450 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddf424a72588ab72a991b755be714f40d51e3054 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:48371695c8bda6eae55aab7e6c5323511e097c8a8d20646ee40c04f927a24803 +size 54864 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a9f31441c511c1c0e2f46ee8048b32f433c9075 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d02a46241db6684616a6db89e89d1b0f8a1efbd8b1e95af8b0d6bb3fbfaad497 +size 80858 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b21649ef11cb990e7935a8731c00b579ed9da12b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.755.1-199805-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3170fbe43cf30a0fbe1556a9a70e670cace4b09834d1de23964972023513c722 +size 185278 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/04dc3838022e96d8d5548bb1b777b38c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/04dc3838022e96d8d5548bb1b777b38c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2652ba0dba022cfa6716d5a2b2f0cc4e7937001 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/04dc3838022e96d8d5548bb1b777b38c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bcd73ac84d2a44804fe78ff9b2b0abb5f79199c35d10c8a19a7488b37070eeb2 +size 23723 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/19a59d6b53059ebd27b13c98793f88e0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/19a59d6b53059ebd27b13c98793f88e0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1d8bf1cf6c4c9eeb50cc11251e7233bbb5b28db --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/19a59d6b53059ebd27b13c98793f88e0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fb5d4e526dd07531bb9652b7bc66697c9fd2ab4690e353ae7e505e22af645e88 +size 16021 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63051c26e08faefb2104b0417166ad1a0ca03538 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/1eadbbe42cfcac5c0023577110aec5e3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2f35b277eddf6a9b4075489a892f8a1182ba88362099a9a6e4100e5287ea2f74 +size 13528 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/28d75f39a24203712ee907b32cf0bbe5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/28d75f39a24203712ee907b32cf0bbe5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3d53d4b535dc6796f50a0a1a416d44d47f74144 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/28d75f39a24203712ee907b32cf0bbe5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:69da195d2bbb0f6dcaa4243a47474101dbf362d77ed3e4b177dc2a667786ea25 +size 21593 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939eb6a57fac47a375526475ba6c31bf67e08b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52a289bbb49d106b16f646b5050f62e5c7cbe1bb201f8c767547c3039abbf359 +size 8245 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da94d439f22c60a43d112e7bc2c43e236dc05280 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:49c3e2b72ca2bb7fec2ad68dd5ef18c2226850a3dab59da75486ec01db06d47f +size 12062 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27e5d754da7837f20ec7740e97dfe15230819b0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ff435251dd0118af4c458ad847b29801cd126f71f2ad8d9d4bd377e030c0bee0 +size 16358 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..409d2306381602ab0d2180cfa3b34b9b5632b287 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fb6737c563d88fcb12403dc1ac0d22e77ae4764eddfe4937670e24e6871bc43a +size 20643 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/5132b3a97ac70fe4765c1e07e66b72b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/5132b3a97ac70fe4765c1e07e66b72b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12f5970de00d9d2397eebb79fc648151ff0f0893 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/5132b3a97ac70fe4765c1e07e66b72b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f63e84b9509b0fbd8fb5d87440c14b856d3116b7b31c7ff4b80f08b910a858b3 +size 30483 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/51db757d054ce1ce83c436a3578b56ca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/51db757d054ce1ce83c436a3578b56ca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c5386512784faf2d13388647b28070214ebdc7a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/51db757d054ce1ce83c436a3578b56ca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:489853ad80af01808cd129968adc2bea998961264d8fe4ebf898e489bbd2daa7 +size 45788 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f433efc4773c6387fa60cf14a8f8299a9bad5a37 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bd8191696cc6b1004a3570838051f0bb71b629fa4d39945e798159f03037706c +size 12703 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21118179d4584fef4543c68f1891f59e3a1e53d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:49dff4539f4dee2b439c748e500df4b9ff5bb99b6c0ba44a9f40f4e339fd9d33 +size 8792 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..661f520d2668abfdd11765bd379591aeaf42d7bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:92ccae68e871b0a4ba4b5c2a1f3fbb9cc6d5d157e69b278ad88521ec033cc13d +size 48610 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/9ee1a10ae91d4878e24b2e7dbaa95c2e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/9ee1a10ae91d4878e24b2e7dbaa95c2e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51ca21af107cedaf68caae675b0a42870ad7ea1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/9ee1a10ae91d4878e24b2e7dbaa95c2e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:66b54100864f6675b35810b158511e52a222ba38cd82904b4d6703396f331af1 +size 8200 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcb376052d9318ca0676ea2f99c7ea23449f6083 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bbc3a2542c9ded56680e38634f9ab35da167786ee2c1393f782e5e48e4050a91 +size 26512 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d260be667ec54af263a4e7d3c04234b91743959 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8789c130d0d3f4bbb0792cf15b0d4f5081602398a3200a1359f75ccca67d8e7c +size 23049 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ecc7f5c5bf40ebf1d59267ba120e8cc4a29b7eb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4ff8f113cef286e2de9b29c2c574006eb58be0470bae835a84edeaa248acede4 +size 8402 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db395493033edacd83e212049fd55715_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db395493033edacd83e212049fd55715_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc6b96a2c698459b4daf59b7892a46a4377c0b78 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db395493033edacd83e212049fd55715_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f7250972a1a462a1332da4d0293ab7ef3531a6170f241914b944a8aa45cbcdb8 +size 12782 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db5ab5d386827a5d5f5fad0f45612b90_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db5ab5d386827a5d5f5fad0f45612b90_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..443bd452757a119363c72a92a5cb317df0a1c4ac --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/db5ab5d386827a5d5f5fad0f45612b90_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:70f3e40f2748a7f32a08ff17cd5d7e7e760bb4c83325d75944d711d07f7dcec7 +size 11967 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/dc1f232cfd39be5c20b21374ad4c04c0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/dc1f232cfd39be5c20b21374ad4c04c0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f7a12664d8842f5cf464ea70a2c1aa3c6c10465 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/dc1f232cfd39be5c20b21374ad4c04c0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ba96fb93522098f95956981e8d0cd15262d98f45b68323db11375935768b36b6 +size 8153 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff40b85a79524d3845cd0ef2346707c2a8d80343 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e180f2b5fcbe8001554a7c0677cd3f82_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:51212b0276424e52117a4a6e3bbbb78c5a16a5d879acb6314ecf2e2794981c75 +size 12608 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e787e02d9214556476d95941bda1d350_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e787e02d9214556476d95941bda1d350_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4688f3c469b146f1eb9d922d680547722c1aee58 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e787e02d9214556476d95941bda1d350_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:44e72c0c3ff2272bab7dd4110290cac180db452c65f4259b0472886dee588f38 +size 22673 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c94fcd463f4385286488cccd3fb1e82d9b3ec14f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/e821c3d8a87ee2a9ff6b8644ffe6bdae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f5e8c646c9cc9b32032ed51b84f4c78f916b833285f7dfa3679330935eef763a +size 13346 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5a0e49a8b4f19b4d5b39b401ddcbe3780ee79ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/eb5677b570ab2a3e9d8f5d35ca5b8a4d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:69028d0700ce2e75aabcab26fcc4bf9f7b31d993ec1b4535b42c8252ddb3240f +size 10685 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c04999ce04a1a706db91053c1d6a698c27b8bba0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.765.5-200404-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:aa9e93093fdf7ea93a82331cebe2689007772752c4bc1f9c990f448416ec8e5f +size 22361 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.772-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.772-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7da83ecb82b51a4cef7694858eef2c35f1986ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.772-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d77a478c5b78d330a2a6abbd32e7d0ac053d8b9c1ffe8a96476214afa6ddf7ae +size 8196 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e46258b9e7857208ea403c8fe77ea87cf23099c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f815cde00ffd7ef8da14f8a5eaba66189a0a169c561cd9d3c07db58b48ca8d69 +size 8166 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7156cf400ef0e19f9d06a5d0549834a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7156cf400ef0e19f9d06a5d0549834a3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..412ce695b2c940cd2bcee451e6f71c50e308263f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7156cf400ef0e19f9d06a5d0549834a3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1d0d19ff29e6bd0f1a5676da3433a1227ce7ad518453c4d20650b65506cfedf0 +size 37303 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b5edf7a92c55b22a5037efd08bf37659029f9fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fec1b19581bad8363091db10f2a0d5bb06a03fb0294ce1bebd4a2ba3ca5a1f26 +size 106067 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70f197a99e54986a698e3a2f5b5b4aff646f8946 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf0198fc314d0fb44acd2f03ed72e5e2c28a8d2e16fe211b7b4e05074f08a917 +size 36247 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..568e83496ec81e2ddea0816f2d6a48fdb237f00b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.775-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,2153 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.775** + +(06/97) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Specifications of Signalling System No. 7 – Transaction +capabilities application part + +--- + +**Guidelines for using transaction capabilities** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.775 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 | +| General | Q.700 | +| Message transfer part (MTP) | Q.701–Q.709 | +| Signalling connection control part (SCCP) | Q.711–Q.719 | +| Telephone user part (TUP) | Q.720–Q.729 | +| ISDN supplementary services | Q.730–Q.739 | +| Data user part | Q.740–Q.749 | +| Signalling System No. 7 management | Q.750–Q.759 | +| ISDN user part | Q.760–Q.769 | +| Transaction capabilities application part | Q.770–Q.779 | +| Test specification | Q.780–Q.799 | +| Q3 interface | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | + +For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations. + +# **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.775** + +# **GUIDELINES FOR USING TRANSACTION CAPABILITIES** + +## **Summary** + +Revised Recommendation Q.775 provides guidance to TC-Users on defining TC-User ASEs. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.775 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 5th of June 1997. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had/had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 1997 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +###### Page + +| | | | +|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | Introduction..... | 1 | +| 1.1 | General..... | 1 | +| 1.2 | Environment..... | 1 | +| 2 | Operations..... | 2 | +| 2.1 | Definition..... | 2 | +| 2.2 | Examples..... | 3 | +| 2.2.1 | Simple operation handlings ..... | 3 | +| 2.2.2 | More complex operation handling..... | 3 | +| 2.3 | Component-related facilities offered to TC-users..... | 5 | +| 2.3.1 | Invocation ..... | 5 | +| 2.3.2 | Cancel (by the TC-user)..... | 6 | +| 2.3.3 | Reject (by the TC-user)..... | 7 | +| 2.3.4 | Remote cancel (by the TC-user)..... | 8 | +| 2.3.5 | Reset of operation timer by the TC-user..... | 10 | +| 2.4 | Component-related abnormal situations ..... | 11 | +| 2.4.1 | Component loss ..... | 11 | +| 2.4.2 | Component duplication..... | 12 | +| 2.4.3 | Component missequencing..... | 14 | +| 2.4.4 | Reject of a component by TC ..... | 15 | +| 2.4.5 | Operation timer expiry..... | 16 | +| 3 | Dialogues ..... | 16 | +| 3.1 | Grouping of components in a message ..... | 16 | +| 3.2 | Dialogue handling facilities ..... | 18 | +| 3.2.1 | Structured dialogue..... | 18 | +| 3.2.2 | Unstructured dialogue..... | 27 | +| 3.3 | Enhanced dialogue control facilities ..... | 27 | +| 3.3.1 | Overview ..... | 27 | +| 3.3.2 | Use of the Application-Context..... | 27 | +| 3.3.3 | Transfer of user data ..... | 28 | +| 3.3.4 | Backward compatibility issues ..... | 29 | +| 4 | Guidance for writing TC-users protocol specifications ..... | 30 | +| 4.1 | Introduction..... | 30 | +| 4.2 | Decomposition of functionality ..... | 30 | +| 4.2.1 | Application process and application entity..... | 30 | +| 4.2.2 | Application service element ..... | 30 | + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 4.2.3 Communications between peer AEs/ASEs..... | 31 | +| 4.3 How to specify an application context..... | 32 | +| 4.4 How to specify an ASE..... | 33 | +| 4.5 How to specify Operations and Errors..... | 33 | +| 4.5.1 General considerations..... | 33 | +| 4.5.2 Use of the OPERATION MACRO notation ..... | 34 | +| 4.5.3 Use of the ERROR MACRO notation..... | 35 | +| 4.5.4 Use of the (information object) CLASS notation ..... | 36 | +| 4.5.5 The ERROR (information object) CLASS..... | 39 | +| 4.5.6 Examples of Operations and Errors description ..... | 39 | +| 4.5.7 Moving from the MACRO notation to the (information object) CLASS
notation and use of ASN.1 modules ..... | 41 | +| 4.5.8 Allocation and Management of Operation and Error Codes ..... | 43 | +| 4.6 Data types specifications..... | 46 | +| 4.6.1 General..... | 46 | +| 4.6.2 Use of tags ..... | 46 | +| 4.6.3 Instances and types ..... | 47 | +| 4.6.4 Exporting and importing data types..... | 47 | +| 4.7 How to specify abstract syntaxes ..... | 47 | +| 4.8 Encoding rules ..... | 48 | +| 5 Mapping of the generic ROS concepts onto TC services ..... | 49 | +| 5.1 Overview..... | 49 | +| 5.1.1 Notation and concept for the generic ROS model ..... | 49 | +| 5.1.2 Communication model ..... | 50 | +| 5.2 Remote operation service realization..... | 51 | +| 5.2.1 Basic services (stub) ..... | 51 | +| 5.2.2 Bind and unbind operations..... | 52 | +| 5.3 Information transfer ..... | 54 | +| 5.3.1 Association realizations..... | 54 | +| 5.3.2 Transfer realization..... | 54 | +| 5.4 TC-based application context ..... | 54 | +| 5.5 Abstract syntaxes ..... | 55 | +| 5.5.1 Dialogue control ..... | 55 | +| 5.5.2 User-defined syntaxes..... | 56 | +| 5.6 Notation extension ..... | 57 | + +# **GUIDELINES FOR USING TRANSACTION CAPABILITIES** + +*(revised in 1997)* + +# **1 Introduction** + +## **1.1 General** + +The purpose of this Recommendation is to provide guidelines to potential users of Transaction Capabilities (TC-users). The examples given are illustrations only; they indicate how an application may use TCAP, not how TC must be used in all cases. The technical basis of this Recommendation are Recommendations Q.771 to Q.774; in case of misalignment, these should be considered as the primary reference. + +The main purpose of TC is to provide support for interactive applications in a distributed environment. TC is based on the Remote Operations concept defined in Recommendation X.880 (ROS) together with some enhancements and additions specific to the Signalling System No. 7 environment to provide the services needed by TC-users. Interactions between distributed application entities are modelled by Operations. An operation is invoked by an (originating) entity: the other (destination) entity attempts to execute the operation and possibly returns the outcome of this attempt. + +The semantics of an operation (represented by its name and parameters) is not relevant to TC; TC provides facilities which are independent of any particular operation. The TC-user, when defining an application, must: + +- 1) select operations (this involves defining the semantics and syntax of the data exchanged during the operation invocations and its responses); +- 2) select TC facilities to support these operations. Such facilities include the handling of individual operations, and the ability to have a number of related operations attached to an association between TC-users, called a dialogue; +- 3) define the application script (e.g. which of the two peers invokes which operations, the order of message exchange that constitutes the dialogue between the peer TC-users, and their reactions to abnormal situations). + +This Recommendation describes the selection process of defining and using operations. The operations appearing hereafter are fictitious, and are taken for illustration purposes only. Also described are the facilities offered by TC for handling one or a sequence of operations in a dialogue. The definition of specific sequences of operations belongs to the application protocol definition and is beyond the scope of this Recommendation; however, clauses 4 and 5 give a brief indication of what information an application specification should contain. + +TC services are made accessible to TC-users via primitives; these primitives model the interface between TC and its users, but do not constrain any implementation of this interface. + +## **1.2 Environment** + +TC defines the end-to-end protocol between TC-users located in a Signalling System No. 7 network. At present, there is no standard interface defined for the use of TC over any other underlying protocol or network (e.g. X.25) than the SCCP of Signalling System No. 7. + +TC considers users which are real-time sensitive and do not need to exchange large amounts of data. It is considered that for these users, the standard protocols defined for OSI layers 4 to 6 in the + +X-Series of Recommendations would result in excessive overheads and hence are not used. + +As a result, TC cannot support all kinds of applications, and a number of applications will still require more elaborate services such as specified in the X-Series of Recommendations. Beside indicating what TC can do, this Recommendation indicates what it cannot do, in order to help the application designer choose how to support an application. + +# 2 Operations + +## 2.1 Definition + +An operation is invoked by an originating TC-user to request a destination TC-user to perform a given action. + +Each operation belongs to a particular class. This indicates whether either a successful outcome (result), or an unsuccessful outcome (error), or both, or none have to be reported by the destination. + +The class of an operation is not signalled to the remote TC-user at the time the operation is invoked; it is assumed that the applications at both ends have a common understanding of the class of each operation in use. + +As well as the class, the definition of the operation includes a timer value indicating the maximum time in which the operation should be completed and the result reported. + +This timer value is a local matter; it is not conveyed to the remote end through any protocol. It is chosen by the TC-user when defining the operation based on expectations of the round trip time from one TC-user to another and processing delays. + +An operation is defined by: + +- its operation code and the type of any parameters associated with the operation request; +- its class; +- if the class requires report of success, the possible results corresponding to successful executions are defined by a list of parameters; +- if the class requires report of failure, the possible results corresponding to situations where the operation could not be executed completely by the remote TC-user. Each such situation is identified by a specific error cause; the list of these error causes is part of the operation definition. Diagnostic information can be added to the error cause: if present, it is part of the definition; +- the list of possible linked operations, if replies consisting of linked operations are allowed for this operation. Linked operations have to be described separately; +- a timer value indicating the interval by which the operation has to be completed, if any, returned. This timer value can be one of the factors that is used by an implementation to manage the invoke ID associated with the operation invocation. (When the timer associated with an operation invocation has expired, the invoke ID is returned to the pool of invoke IDs after a suitable, implementation-dependent "freezing" period.) + +As a general rule, the choice of the class of an operation should be based on the semantics associated with an operation and operations should not be designed to be carried in any particular message. For instance, if the invoker of the operation does not require any acknowledgement of whether an operation could actually be performed or not, then an operation of Class 4 may be the most appropriate. If an operation invoker does not require explicit acknowledgement that an operation has been performed successfully, but wishes to know if it could not be performed at all, then an operation of Class 2 is suitable. For example, defining an operation such as "Play Announcement" as + +Class 2 or 4 suggests different intentions of the operation invoker even though the actions of the operation performer may be identical. + +## **2.2 Examples** + +### **2.2.1 Simple operation handlings** + +NOTE – The operation invocation should fit into one message, and so should the report of a successful outcome. Reports of success may be segmented using Return Result – Not last and Return Result – Last. + +#### **Class 1 (both success and failure reported)** + +Translate a freephone number into a called subscriber number; return the called number if the translation can be performed, otherwise indicate why it cannot; time allocated: 2 seconds. + +If the response is not returned for an operation invocation after the timer has expired, the TC-user is informed (operation cancel led by TC); it may assume that either the invocation or the response was lost and, depending on the application requirements, take suitable corrective actions (e.g. invoke the operation again, inform local management, etc.). + +#### **Class 2 (only failure reported)** + +Perform a routine test and send a reply only in case something went wrong; time allocated: 1 minute. + +In the case of a Class 2 operation, the TC-user is informed if no result has been received when the timer expires. This is interpreted as a successful outcome, even if the invocation was lost. + +This aspect should be considered when selecting Class 2. + +#### **Class 3 (only success reported)** + +Perform a test: this corresponds to a pessimistic view, where failure is considered as the default option, not requiring any reply. + +Timer expiry is indicated to the TC-user: this should be interpreted by the TC-user as a failure of the operation (but is considered normal by TC, which considers that the operation has terminated). This aspect should be considered when selecting Class 3. + +#### **Class 4 (neither success, nor failure reported)** + +Send a warning, without expecting a reply or acknowledgement of any kind. + +In this case, a result never arises from the invocation of the operation. The TC-user relies upon TC and the network to deliver the invocation. Notification of the timer expiry is a local matter. + +#### **Comparisons with ROSE operation classes (Recommendation X.219)** + +ROSE provides for five classes of operations: Classes 2 to 5, called asynchronous classes, are identical to Classes 1 to 4 of TC. ROSE's Class 1 is a synchronous class; it has no counterpart in TC, where full-duplex exchanges of components are considered. + +However, a TC-user can decide to operate in a synchronous manner (see 3.2.1). + +### **2.2.2 More complex operation handling** + +#### **Operations with segmented results** + +A successful result may be divided into several segments, each of which is indicated to the originator of the operation by one primitive. This facility, using the TC-RESULT-NL primitive, can be used by TC-users to overcome the absence of segmentation in the underlying layers. The last segment is indicated by the TC-RESULT-L primitive. + +The report of an error cannot be segmented. + +When the protocol designer can ensure that segmentation is provided by the underlying layers across the signalling routes on which TC messages are transferred, the use of this segmenting facility is deprecated. + +TC cannot identify a specific segment in the case of a segmented result. + +The TC-user should ensure that each segment can be parsed (i.e. the parameter Parameter of each TC-RESULT-NL/L request primitive should contain enough information to enable the construction of a valid value of the type (or compatible sub-type) associated with the result of the operation. + +Example E1: An operation requests the execution of a test. The result of a correct execution is segmented in three parts P1, P2 and P3 to be returned to the originator. + +A possible primitive sequence for example E1 is given in Table 1. + +**Table 1/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(Test)
TC-RESULT-NL req
(P1) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(P1) | TC-RESULT-NL req
(P2) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(P2) | TC-RESULT-L req
(P3) | +| TC-RESULT-L ind
(P3) | | +| Time | | +| NOTE – The timeout value is specified by the originating TC-user at invocation time. A non-final result does not restart it. | | + +#### **Linked operations** + +Another extension to the basic operation scheme is the ability to link an operation invocation to another operation invocation. + +Typically, this facility covers situations where the destination of the original (linked-to) operation requires additional information in order to process this operation: this is the case where menu facilities are used (menu facilities allow a user to make a sequence of choices, each being dependent on the previous ones). + +Example E2: The operation is the execution of a test with several options; before the test is executed, these options are offered for selection to the test originator (TC-user A). Two operations are nested: operation 1 is the test; operation 2 is the option selection. TC-user A first responds to operation 2 before TC-user B can perform the test with the indicated option(s). + +A possible primitive sequence for example E2 is given in Table 2. + +There is no limit to the number of operation invocations which may be linked to a given operation invocation. + +Note that when an operation B is linked to another operation A, they do not have to be nested. The only condition is that the invocation of B should take place before the outcome of A is reported; + +however, operation B does not have to terminate before operation A. + +**Table 2/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(Test, Class = 1) | Operation 1 begin
TC-INVOKED ind
(Test)
TC-INVOKED req
(Option-selection, Class = 1)      Operation 2 begin | +| TC-INVOKED ind
(Option-selection)
TC-RESULT-L req
(Options) | TC-RESULT-L ind
(Options)      Operation 2 end
TC-RESULT-L req
(Test-result) | +| TC-RESULT-L ind
(Test-result) | Operation 1 end | +| Time | | + +## 2.3 Component-related facilities offered to TC-users + +### 2.3.1 Invocation + +So far, operations have been considered from the static point of view. Invocation introduces a dynamic aspect: a specific invocation of an operation has to be differentiated from other possible concurrent invocations of the same or of another operation. + +Each particular activation of an operation is identified by an invoke ID. This invoke ID must be unambiguous. It is selected by the TC-user which originates the operation invocation, and passed to the destination TC-user, which will reflect it in its reply (or each segment of a reply) or in a linked invocation: therefore it correlates the reply to an invocation (or each segment of a reply) or a linked invocation, and the invocation itself. + +The TC-user is free to assign any value to the invoke ID (index, address, . . .) provided that its value can be mapped to an integer which can be encoded in one octet according to the encoding rules specified in Recommendation Q.773. Note that such an integer takes values between -128 and 127. + +The invoke ID associated with an invocation becomes reusable when the last or only segment of a result is received, or when certain abnormal situations are indicated by TC; however, the value should not be reallocated immediately for another operation activation, as immediate reallocation would prevent the correct handling of some situations (see below). + +The period during which an invoke ID is released, but cannot be reallocated, is called the freezing period. This period is implementation-dependent. + +As invoke IDs receive their value dynamically at the time the operation is invoked, their value cannot appear in the specification of the application protocols; rather, a "logical" value, to which a real value is substituted at execution time, should be indicated in order to identify an operation in a single flow. + +Taking invoke IDs into consideration, the sequence of primitives for example E2 above becomes as shown in Table 3: + +**Table 3/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(1, Test)
TC-INVOKED req
(2, 1, Option-selection, Class = 1) | +| TC-INVOKED ind
(2, 1, Option-selection)
TC-RESULT-L req
(2, Options) | TC-RESULT-L ind
(2, Options)
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, Test-result) | +| TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, Test-result) | | +| Time | | + +where the first parameter of a primitive indicates an invoke ID. When both parameters have to be present, the second one is the linked ID. This is a pure notational convention. + +### **2.3.2 Cancel (by the TC-user)** + +The TC-user requesting invocation of an operation may stop the activity associated with the corresponding invoke ID, for any reason it finds appropriate. However, cancel should in principle be reserved for abnormal situations: the normal method for terminating an operation is to receive a result or to terminate on timer expiry. + +Cancelling has local effect only: it does not prevent the remote TC-user from sending replies to a cancelled operation. When received, these replies will be rejected by TC, as illustrated in the following, which represents a sequence of primitives for the example E1 defined above, where TC-user A cancels the test after receiving the first segment of the result. + +In Table 4, segment P2 is not received by TC-user A: TC detects a reject situation (no active Invoke ID) and therefore does not deliver it to TC-user A, and any attempt by TC-user B to send more segments of the reply is rejected at A's side. + +**Table 4/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(1, Test)
TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P1) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P1)
Cancel decision:
TC-CANCEL req
(1)
TC-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code)
... | TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P2)
... | +| Time | | + +### 2.3.3 Reject (by the TC-user) + +The TC-user has the sole responsibility of deciding when to send a reject component or when to return an error (failure to perform an operation) indication. The TC-user may reject a component for any reason it finds appropriate, providing that there is a suitable reject problem code defined in the TC specifications (e.g. mandatory information element missing in an operation, error or reply, unexpected operation, unknown operation, etc.) that it can use for the purpose. + +Similarly, the TC-user decides which error code and diagnostic information (which is specified as part of the TC-user protocol specifications and agreed to by the two peer TC-users for just this purpose) to use when sending an error component. + +The role of the TC-user is illustrated in the following example. + +The TC-user at side A expects, in a given situation, to receive operation Y only as a linked operation. When receiving from side B an Invoke component with an operation code referring to Y but no linked ID, the TC-user at side A may elect to: + +- not perform the operation and return an error with some previously-determined diagnostic parameter specified in the TC-user application specification just for this purpose; +- reject the component as an "unrecognized operation". + +Interpretation of the returned error diagnostic or reject problem code is the responsibility of the TC-user at side B and is not described in the TC Recommendations. + +Reject of an operation invocation, or of a result, affects the whole operation: no more replies will be accepted by TC for this invocation. Reject of a linked operation does not affect the linked-to operation as far as TC is concerned. The TC-user should describe their reactions to such abnormal situations as part of their application script. + +This is illustrated in Table 5 where, in example E2, TC-user A did not expect the option selection process (it may be an optional feature), and rejects the operation with the Problem Code "Unexpected Linked Operation". TC-user B may then decide to execute the test assuming a default option. + +**Table 5/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(1, Test)
TC-INVOKED req
(2, 1, Option-selection, Class = 1) | +| TC-INVOKED ind
(2, 1, Option-selection)
TC-U-REJECT req
(2, Problem Code) | | +| | TC-U-REJECT ind
(2, Problem Code)
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, Test-result) | +| TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, Test-result) | | +| Time | | + +When an operation invocation is rejected, the TC-user may decide to reinvoke it (e.g. the invoke component was corrupted); this would be a new invocation (new Invoke ID). It may also decide to abort the dialogue. A very simple dialogue (a question and a response) may not define any recovery mechanisms, except when the operation is of critical importance (e.g. a database update). + +### 2.3.4 Remote cancel (by the TC-user) + +TC does not provide any specific service for cancelling the remote execution of an operation in progress. The cancel service provided by the TC-U-CANCEL req primitive has only a local effect (see 2.3.2). + +However, a remote cancel procedure can be defined at the TC-user level, using existing TC services. One solution for the TC-user is to include in one of the ASEs used by the application-context, an operation whose purpose is to cancel existing invocations. + +The following ASN.1 module provides a description of such an operation type. This type (and the associated error type) can be imported in one of the modules used by the TC-user so that it can allocate suitable operation and error codes. Alternatively the TC-user may also design its own operation based on the same principles. + +**TCAP-Tools { ccitt recommendation q 775 modules(2) tools(1) version1(1) }** + +**DEFINITIONS ::=** + +**BEGIN** + +**EXPORTS Cancel, CancelFailed, Cancelled;** + +**IMPORTS OPERATION, ERROR, InvokeIdType** + +**FROM TCAPMessages { ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) messages(1) version2(2) };** + +**Cancel ::= OPERATION** + +**ARGUMENT InvokeIdType** + +-- a TC-user may redefine this type to include +-- an empty result so that it becomes a Class 1 operation +**ERRORS { CancelFailed }** +-- timer = 15 s + +**CancelFailed ::= ERROR** +**PARAMETER SET {** +    **problem [0] CancelProblem,** +    **invokeId [1] InvokeIdType }** + +**CancelProblem ::= ENUMERATED** +{ **unknownInvocation(0),** +  **tooLate (1),** +  **notCancellable (2) }** + +-- a TC-user may redefine this type to include application-specific problems + +**Cancelled ::= ERROR** +-- an error of this type should be included in the error list of cancellable operations + +**END** + +It is necessary to include a "cancelled" error in the list of errors attached to the cancellable operations. In such a case, the TC-user which receives the cancel request will issue a TC-U-ERROR req primitive to terminate the operation. The receipt of an error component with this error code and the corresponding TC-U-ERROR ind will then terminate the operation at the invoking side. + +The operation to be cancelled is identified by the invokeId which has been allocated to it at invocation time. The invocation of the Cancel operation does not affect the invocation state machine of the operation to be cancelled, because the invokeId carried in the operation argument is not visible to the component sub-layer. + +If the cancellation fails, a user error is reported with three possible diagnostics: + +- unknownInvocation: If the invocation has never happened, or has been forgotten; +- tooLate: If the invocation is still known but the execution is at a stage that does not permit a cancellation; +- notCancellable: The invokeId in the argument of the cancel operation corresponds to an operation which has not been agreed by the TC-users being cancellable by the invoking side. + +When the cancellation is performed with success and no return error with error code indicating "cancelled" is received for the cancelled operation, the timer associated with the cancelled operation will expire, causing a TC-L-CANCEL ind primitive to be issued by TC. + +Alternatively, the TC-user requesting the cancellation may decide to issue a TC-U-CANCEL req immediately after having sent the cancel request so that no further local activities exist for the operation to be cancelled. + +The use of the cancel mechanism makes sense if the Cancel operation is invoked before the expiration of the timer associated with the operation to be cancelled. After this, the invoke Id may not be recognized at the performing side as the operation execution may have completed and the response primitive issued. The ability to cancel the execution of an operation after timer expiry is outside the scope of these guidelines because it would mean that the objective is not to cancel the operation execution but the subsequent actions which may have been triggered at the performing end by the invocation. + +### 2.3.5 Reset of operation timer by the TC-user + +The selection of an appropriate timer value is part of the definition of an operation. The timer supervision is started by TC when the invoke component to which it relates is sent. However, the TC-user has the ability to request TC to reset this timer at any time before it expires. + +The protocol designer selects the timer value according to an estimation of the time required for the completion of the execution of the operation and the transfer of the result. However there are cases where a significant dispersion of the actual execution time is foreseen, making difficult the selection of an appropriate value. + +In order to prevent that the operation timer expires while the request is still in progress, the protocol designer can choose one of the two following approaches: + +- a) select a timer value which is greater than estimated completion time in the worst case; +- b) select a timer value which corresponds to the most likely case and arrange the TC-user in such a way that it uses the TC-RESET-TIMER service when it detects that the completion of the operation will take longer than expected. In that case, appropriate procedures need to be defined in order to ensure that the originating TC-user is informed of this situation (e.g. using linked operations). + +In the following example, the TC-user A invokes several times the "query" operation to retrieve three different pieces of information from a database system which is distributed to two other locations B1 and B2. Since the TC-user A has no knowledge about how the data are distributed over these two locations, it sends all the requests to the TC-user in B1. + +In the first case, the requested information is locally available in B1. In the two other cases, the requested information has to be retrieved from B2. The TC-user B1 notifies the TC-user A that the completion of the request will take more time than expected, invoking a "wait" operation. In the second case, the TC-user A accepts to wait longer than expected and requests TC to reset the operation timer. In the third case, the TC-user A prefers to abandon the operation with a user-specific procedure similar to those described in section 2.3.4. See Table 5 *bis*. + +**Table 5 *bis*/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B1 | TC-user B2 | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------| +| First Query
TC-INVOKE req
(1, query, Timeout = 5 s) | TC-INVOKE ind (1, query)
requested information locally
available
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, query-result) | | +| TC-RESULT-L ind (1, query-result)
Second Query
TC-INVOKE req
(2, query, Timeout = 5 s) | TC-INVOKE ind (2, query)
requested information not locally
available
TC-INVOKE req (3, 2, wait)
TC-INVOKE req (1, query) | | + +**Table 5 bis/Q.775 (concluded)** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B1 | TC-user B2 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKE ind (3, 2, wait)
TC-RESET-TIMER req (2) | | TC-INVOKE ind
(1, query)
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, query-result) | +| | TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, query-result)
forward received result to A
TC-RESULT-L req
(2, query-result) | | +| TC-RESULT-L ind (2, query-result)
Third Query
TC-INVOKE req
(3, query, Timeout = 5 s) | TC-INVOKE ind (3, query)
requested information not locally
available
TC-INVOKE req (4, 3, wait)
TC-INVOKE req (2, query) | | +| TC-INVOKE ind (4, 3, wait)
TC-INVOKE req [5, cancel (3)] | | TC-INVOKE ind
(2, query)
TC-RESULT-L req
(2, query-result) | +| | TC-INVOKE ind [5, cancel (3)]
TC-U-ERROR req (3, cancelled)
TC-RESULT-L ind (1, query-
result)
discard received result to A | | +| TC-U-ERROR ind (3, cancelled) | | | + +## 2.4 Component-related abnormal situations + +### 2.4.1 Component loss + +TC assumes a very low probability of message loss in the network; if this probability is too high for an application, it should use the connection-oriented network service approach. If some protocol information needs an upgraded Quality of Service (e.g. charging information), the application should introduce its own mechanisms to obtain higher reliability for this information. + +#### Loss of an operation invocation + +Table 6 illustrates the case, in example E1, where no response to the test is received before the time limit expires. + +**Table 6/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|----------------------------------------|------------------| +| TC-INVVOKE req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | | +| Time limit:
TC-L-CANCEL ind
(1) | | +| Time | | + +When a Class 1 operation is lost, the TC-user is informed when the timer associated with the operation expires. When a Class 1 operation with a single result (in a single segment) is lost, TC cannot indicate whether either the operation invocation, or the reply, was lost. If the application needs to discriminate between these two cases, it should do it in the application protocol (e.g. using the time-stamping or acknowledging the operation invocation before replying to it). + +For a Class 2 operation, loss will be considered as a success (whether the invocation, or the failure report, was lost). This, considering the probability of loss, may be acceptable for non-critical operations (e.g. statistical measurements). + +For a Class 3 operation, loss is treated in the same way as operation failure, whether the invocation, or the success report, has been lost. + +For a Class 4 operation, loss will not be visible to TC. + +#### **Loss of a result** + +- Loss of a non-final result is never detected by TC. +- Loss of a final result will eventually be indicated to the TC-user when the time limit is reached, but cannot always be unambiguously interpreted as the loss of a reply; if no non-final result has been received, it may be that the invocation was lost. + +#### **Loss of a linked operation** + +The loss of a linked operation has the same effect as the loss of a non-linked operation. It has no effect on the linked-to operation. + +#### **Loss of a reject component** + +This case should be extremely infrequent, and no application should try to recover from such a situation. If the lost reject concerns an operation invocation, then when the operation times out, the TC-user who invoked the operation will consider that the invocation (or the reply) was lost, and react accordingly; if it concerns a reply, the originator of the reply will not be aware that it was incorrect: it will be up to the originator of the operation to detect the loss. + +### **2.4.2 Component duplication** + +As message duplication is very infrequent in the Signalling System No. 7 network, scripts for No. 7 applications need not define sophisticated scenarios in anticipation of such situations. However, any application in which duplication would be unacceptable should either define its own duplication detection mechanism or use a connection-oriented service. + +#### Duplicate operation invocation + +When an operation invocation is duplicated (by the service provider), the destination TC-user (B) may, or may not, detect the duplication: + +- TC-user B detects the duplication: the duplicate may be rejected using the problem code "duplicated invoke ID". In the case of such a rejection, this can be interpreted by the remote TC-user as rejection of the original invocation; +- TC-user B does not detect the duplication: this may happen when there is a master-slave relationship between A and B, and B executes the operation with no knowledge of the context. + +Assuming the second case in example E1, a possible sequence could be as given in Table 7. + +**Table 7/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVVOKE req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVVOKE ind
(1, Test)
TC-INVVOKE ind
(1, Test)
TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P1)
TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P1) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P1)
TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P1)
A detects an abnormal situation and rejects:
TC-U-REJECT req
(1, Problem Code)
TC detects an abnormal situation and rejects P2:
TC-L-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | Undetected duplication of invocation | +| | TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P2)
TC-U-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | +| | TC-R-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | +| Time | | + +In this sequence, TC-user B considers two independent test invocations, and responds to each of them. The first result P1 is accepted; TC-user A detects that P1 is received a second time, and rejects it; this terminates the operation, and causes result P2 to be rejected when received (reject by TC). Therefore, both activities at B's side will terminate on receipt of rejects. + +#### Duplicate non-final result + +If a non-final result is duplicated, TC cannot detect it, and will deliver it twice to the TC-user. Detection of this situation is left to the application. + +#### Duplicate final result + +If a final result (RR-L) is duplicated, TC can detect the situation: the second final result is considered as abnormal (the operation has been terminated by the first "final" result), and TC rejects it. + +Table 8 shows a sequence for example E1 where the third segment of the result is duplicated (by the network). + +Comment: Discarding of duplicates in all cases by TC would probably appear to be a helpful feature. However, it should be noted that: + +- 1) it would require another degree of complexity in TC, which contradicts the basic characteristics of TC in the connectionless approach; +- 2) it corresponds to a situation which is extremely infrequent, at least in the No. 7 network. + +To cover these situations when required by an application, it would be better to use a connection-oriented network service approach, since duplication could then be detected and handled at the lower layers. + +Table 8/Q.775 + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKE req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKE ind
(1, Test) | +| | TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P1) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P1) | TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P2) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P2) | TC-RESULT-L req
(1, P3) | +| TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, P3) | | +| TC receives
RR-L (1, P3) | | +| Duplication of P3:
TC-L-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | | +| | TC-R-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | +| Time | | + +### 2.4.3 Component missequencing + +For TC, the order of segmented results is not relevant: if the order is important to the TC-user, appropriate mechanisms should be defined in the application protocol (e.g. by introducing a numbering scheme to identify intermediate replies in a parameter of these replies, or by using a connection-oriented service). + +Due to missequencing, a non-final result may arrive after a final result: when this occurs the non-final result is rejected by TC. This is because the final result causes TC to close the invocation state machine associated with this operation; so when the delayed non-final result is received it cannot be associated with any active invocation state machine. + +The sequence in Table 9 illustrates what happens in example E1 when the last part of the result is received before the second one: both TC-users are informed. + +If a linked operation invocation is received after the final result of the linked-to operation (as a result of a missequencing), the linked operation is rejected. + +TC assumes a very low probability of missequencing; if the supporting network is not satisfactory in this respect, the connection-oriented network service approach should be considered. + +### 2.4.4 Reject of a component by TC + +A general principle when TC receives a component (operation invocation or reply) which is either not formatted correctly, or received out of context (e.g. a reply without a prior operation invocation), is to reject it, which means that: + +- 1) TC forms a Reject component to inform the originator of the faulty component and informs the local TC-user of the Reject component waiting to be sent to the remote end; TC provides whatever information is available on the nature of the component being rejected (if the dialogue has not already been terminated by the remote TC-user). +- 2) In reaction to this, the local TC-user may decide to abort, continue, or end the dialogue. In the last two cases, when the TC-user notifies TC of its decision, the peer TC-user is informed of the reject. + +Table 9/Q.775 + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(1, Test)
TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P1) | +| TC-RESULT-NL ind
(1, P1)

TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, P3)
RR-NL (1, P2) PDU arrives
Missequenced result:
reject (no active state machine)
TC-L-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | TC-RESULT-NL req
(1, P2)
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, P3) | +| | TC-R-REJECT ind
(1, Problem Code) | +| Time | | + +Possible cases of reject by TC have been encountered in the previous clauses. Whenever the invoke ID is recognized, rejection by TC causes the termination of the operation: a possible recovery by the TC-user is a new invocation of the terminated operation. When the rejected component is not identifiable, the local TC-user is informed of the received malformed component, and a NULL invoke ID value is included in the Reject component waiting to be sent. However, as this Reject component cannot be associated with any known invocation, abort of the dialogue may be the appropriate reaction. + +### 2.4.5 Operation timer expiry + +When TC informs the TC-user of timer expiry (TC-L-CANCEL indication), it indicates that no more information related to the operation invocation (in particular, no reject) can be received. If the peer entity still sends information in relation to this invocation, this information will be discarded when received, provided that the invoke ID of the cancelled operation has not been reallocated. Premature reallocation of invoke ID values is normally avoided by correctly setting timer values and choosing the time an invoke ID is "frozen" after it has been released. In order to compensate for uncertainties in the amount of time required to send information from TC-user to another without accounting for the absolute worst case (which is also in general the most unlikely), an implementation-dependent mechanism avoiding premature reallocation of invoke IDs is required. + +Timer expiry indication corresponds to an abnormal situation only in the case of a Class 1 operation. The TC-user is then aware that either the invocation, or the reply, was lost. If no undesirable side effects arise, another invocation of the same operation can take place after timer expiry. This is illustrated by the sequence in Table 10 for example E1. + +Timer expiry for a Class 2 operation indicates that no failure was received nor will be accepted for this invocation: it is a definite indication of success (for Class 2) if it is assumed that there is no possibility of message loss in the network. A parallel situation applies to Class 3 in case of failure. The indication of timer expiry for a Class 4 operation is a local decision. + +**Table 10/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(1, Test, Class = 1) | TC-INVOKED ind
(1, Test) | +| Timer expiry:
TC-L-CANCEL ind
(1)
TC-INVOKED req
(2, Test, Class = 1) | | +| Time | | + +# 3 Dialogues + +Whenever one of the operation handling primitives considered in Clause 2 is issued, a request is passed to TC, but nothing is sent to the remote TC-user until a primitive requesting transmission is issued. These primitives, and their relation with operation handling primitives, are considered now. + +## 3.1 Grouping of components in a message + +The effect of TC-user issuing a component handling primitive (unless this primitive has local effect only), is to build a component to be included in a message. The message is not transmitted until the TC-user requests it. + +Note that a component may also be generated as a consequence of a TC reject procedure: in this case this component is put in the next message for the dialogue unless this dialogue is aborted. + +Provided that the maximum size of a message is not exceeded, several components can be grouped and sent to the remote end as a single message, thereby saving transmission overhead. This is done under control of the TC-user, who explicitly specifies when it wants (all) the component(s) awaiting + +transmission to be sent. The components awaiting transmission are those for which the TC-user has previously issued a component-handling primitive with the same dialogue ID. + +Until such time when the SS No. 7 SCCP layer provides a segmenting and reassemble capability, the TC-user has to ensure that the maximum size of an SS No. 7 message will not be exceeded. + +Example E3, as given in Table 11, shows the beginning of a dialogue with a network service centre where a switch requests instructions (operation 1) and receives a request to connect the call to a given destination address, and a request to send information (e.g. announcement or message to be displayed) to the calling party. Both components are contained in a single message. + +TC-BEGIN and TC-CONTINUE are transmission primitives described in 3.2. + +There may be one transmission primitive for each component (thus there is only one component maximum in each message), or fewer transmission primitives than components which allows the grouping of components within a message. In addition, the information contained in the parameters of the transmission primitives (e.g. addressing information) applies to all the components included in the message. + +At the originating side, the primitive requesting transmission appears after the component handling primitives; this indicates that the transmission of all the preceding components has to take place immediately; it avoids indicating specific components to be transmitted with a given transmission primitive, and allows transmission primitives without any associated component. + +At the destination side, the primitive indicating the reception of transmitted components appears first: it contains control information which is necessary for TC to deliver each of the components (if any) in the message; the last component of the message is indicated to the TC-user by the "Last Component" parameter. The components are delivered to the destination TC-user in the same order as they were passed to TC by the originating TC-user. + +**Table 11/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOK req
(1, Provide-Instructions, Class = 1)
TC-BEGIN req
(Control parameters) | | +| | TC-BEGIN ind
(Control parameters)
TC-INVOK ind
(1, Provide-Instructions)
TC-INVOK req
(2, 1, Connect-Call)
TC-RESULT-L req
(1, Send-Info)
TC-CONTINUE req
(Control parameters) | +| TC-CONTINUE ind
(Control parameters)
TC-INVOK ind
(2, 1, Connect-Call)
TC-RESULT-L ind
(1, Send-Info) | | +| Time | | + +## 3.2 Dialogue handling facilities + +When two TC-users co-operate in an application, more than one operation invocation is generally required. The resulting flow of components has to be identified so that: + +- 1) components related to the same flow can be identified; +- 2) flows corresponding to several instances of the same application can be identified and allowed to run in parallel. + +Each such flow is called a dialogue by the TC-user and is identified by a corresponding Dialogue ID parameter. The dialogue handling facility provided for this purpose is the structured dialogue. + +When only a single message is required to complete a distributed application, the Unidirectional message of the unstructured dialogue may be used. The originator does not expect a report of the outcome of the operation (i.e. may only invoke Class 4 operations), but may receive a report of a protocol error if one occurs. This report of a protocol error will also be carried in a Unidirectional message. + +### 3.2.1 Structured dialogue + +#### 3.2.1.1 General + +The use of dialogues allows several independent flows of components to coexist between two TC-users. The Dialogue ID parameter is used in both operation handling and transmission (dialogue) handling primitives to determine which component(s) pertain(s) to which dialogue. + +In the following examples, the Dialogue ID parameter is represented (by convention) by the first parameter in these primitives, starting with letter D. Each TC-user has its own reference for a given dialogue. Local references (those used on the interface) are represented here; mapping of these local references onto protocol references (called Transaction IDs) included in messages is done by TC. + +Three primitives have been defined for handling dialogues under normal circumstances; they indicate dialogue begin (TC-BEGIN), continuation (TC-CONTINUE) or end (TC-END). Each of these primitives may be used to request transmission of 0, 1 or several components; these components may contain information relating to one or several operations. + +Table 12 illustrates a possible sequence for example E2, where the test request starts the dialogue, which ends when the test result has been sent. + +**Table 12/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKE req
(D1, 1, Test, Class = 1)
TC-BEGIN req
(D1, Address) | | +| | TC-BEGIN ind
(D2, Address)
TC-INVOKE ind
(D2, 1, Test)
TC-INVOKE req
(D2, 2, 1, Option-selection, Class = 1)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D2) | +| TC-CONTINUE ind
(D1)
TC-INVOKE ind
(D1, 2, 1, Option-selection)
TC-RESULT req
(D1, 2, Options)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D1) | | +| | TC-CONTINUE ind
(D2)
TC-RESULT-L ind
(D2, 2, Options)
TC-RESULT-L req
(D2, 1, Test-result)
TC-END req
(D2) | +| TC-END ind
(D1, normal)
TC-RESULT-L ind
(D1, 1, Test-result) | | +| Time | | +| NOTE – D1 and D2 are local references for the same dialogue and map onto transaction IDs which appear in the messages. | | + +Any grouping of components is allowed in the messages of a dialogue: TC does not check, for instance, that a message terminating a dialogue does not include operation invocations of Class 1. + +Full-duplex exchange of components is assumed: if a TC-user wants to introduce some restrictions, e.g. working in a synchronous mode as defined for ROSE users, it would have to introduce the necessary procedures itself. + +#### 3.2.1.2 Exchange of messages + +Transmission of messages is accomplished with the Quality of Service of the underlying layer services: no flow control or error recovery mechanisms are provided by TC. + +- The first dialogue handling primitive of a dialogue must indicate dialogue begin (TC-BEGIN). Further messages must not be sent from the side originating the dialogue until + +a message is received in the backward direction, indicating dialogue continuation. + +- If a TC-user tries to send a large number of messages in a short amount of time, no flow control mechanism in TC will prevent it. +- SCCP Class 1 in-sequence delivery can be requested as an option, indicated by the Quality of Service parameter. Note that this option may not be available end-to-end when interworking with a network which does not provide it. + +#### 3.2.1.3 Dialogue end + +TC places no restriction on the ability for a TC-user to request dialogue end. It follows that messages may be lost if no precautions are taken in the application on when the dialogue may end. + +In particular, if the application protocol allows both TC-users to issue TC-END primitives at about the same time, and if these primitives trigger transmission of components, it is likely that some (if not all) of these components will not be delivered to their respective destination TC-users. + +It is up to the application to define, if necessary, its own rules concerning the right to end a dialogue: TC will not check them. + +Any message received for a terminated dialogue is discarded if it requests dialogue end, and any message other than an End or an Abort causes the dialogue to be aborted at the remote entity. + +It should be noted that a TC-user cannot reject, by means of a TC-U-REJECT request primitive, any component received in an END message. If it is important for an application to be able to reject any component received or be notified of rejections by the remote end, then all components must be placed in either the initial BEGIN message or subsequent CONTINUE messages. + +The dialogue is terminated by either the pre-arranged method, or by sending an END message containing no components, or REJECT components (if applicable). + +The differences between the three ways of ending a dialogue are as follows. + +##### Prearranged end + +A typical application is the access to a distributed database, where the requesting user (TC-user A) does not know where the information it seeks is located. TC-user A broadcasts a request to each location which might have the information required, and will eventually receive a response from the TC-user which holds this information. Prearranged end avoids messages from the other destinations saying: "I do not have this information". Only the responding destination may continue the dialogue (if so wished); all other destination will, by convention, end the dialogue locally; the originator of the requests will also end the dialogues with the non-responding destinations locally, when it receives the response to its request. Note that the convention is between applications: TC does not check that it is respected, nor is it indicated in the TC protocol. + +Example E4 in Table 13 illustrates this situation, with two destinations B1 and B2; two dialogues (D1, D2) and (D3, D4) are started; B1 happens to own the requested information, and decides to continue the dialogue. + +Prearranged end may also be used when a TC-user wants to send information, and does not expect a reply of any kind afterwards. + +**Table 13/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B1 | TC-user B2 | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(D1, 1, Question)
TC-BEGIN req
(D1, Address)
TC-INVOKED req
(D3, 1, Question)
TC-BEGIN req
(D3, Address) | TC-BEGIN ind
(D2, Address)
TC-INVOKED ind
(D2, 1, Question)
TC-RESULT-L req
(D2, 1, Response)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D2)
..... | TC-BEGIN ind
(D4, Address)
TC-INVOKED ind
(D4, 1, Question)
B2 does not have the
information:
TC-END req
(D4, local) | +| TC-CONTINUE ind
(D1)
TC-RESULT-L ind
(D1, 1, Response)
D1 goes on
D3 ends locally
TC-END req
(D3, Local) | | | +| Time | | | + +##### Basic end + +When a TC-user issues the TC-END request primitive, it causes transmission of any pending components to the remote end. TC does not check that all operation invocations have received a response when dialogue end is requested: no notification is given to the TC-user that any pending operation invocations have not received a final result. + +At the receiving end, the dialogue is considered terminated when all the components received within the message indicating the end have been delivered to the TC-user. + +Example: the dialogue ends when the test in example E1, Table 14, receives a response. + +**Table 14/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

.....

TC-END ind
(D1)

TC-RESULT-NL ind
(D1, 1, P1)

TC-RESULT-NL ind
(D1, 1, P2)

TC-RESULT-L ind
(D1, 1, P3)

End of dialogue for A

|

.....

TC-RESULT-NL req
(D2, 1, P1)

TC-RESULT-NL req
(D2, 1, P2)

TC-RESULT-L req
(D2, 1, P3)

TC-END req
(D2, normal)

End of dialogue for B

| +| Time | | + +##### Abort by the TC-user + +The abort facility allows the TC-user to stop the dialogue at any time. A typical case is when the user abandons the service. The main differences between this and normal ending are: + +- any components for which transmission is pending are not sent to the peer entity; +- peer-to-peer TC-user information can be transmitted at the time the abort is issued, and this is delivered to the remote TC-user. + +The sequence given in Table 15 shows a user abandonment in example E2. + +**Table 15/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(D1, 1, Test, Class = 1)
TC-BEGIN req
(D1, Address) | | +| | TC-BEGIN ind
(D2, Address)
TC-INVOKED ind
(D2, 1, Test)
TC-INVOKED req
(D2, 2, 1, Option-selection, Class = 1)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D2) | +| TC-CONTINUE ind
(D1)
TC-INVOKED ind
(D1, 2, 1, Option-selection)
TC-U-ABORT req
(D1, Cause) | | +| | TC-U-ABORT ind
(D2, Cause) | +| Time | | + +#### 3.2.1.4 Message-related abnormal situations + +These are considered independently from the effects of such events in the Component sub-layer. + +##### Message loss + +TC provides no protection against message loss. Three cases are identified: + +- 1) the message begins a new dialogue: the dialogue will exist at the originating side only, and no message will be allowed in either direction. Eventually, an implementation-dependent mechanism at the originating end ends the dialogue; +- 2) the message continues an existing dialogue: loss is not detected. TC will react (or not) to the loss of included components as indicated in 2.4.1; +- 3) the message ends a dialogue: TC will eventually react (via a timer expiry as described in 2.4.1) if this message contained a response to a Class 1 operation: otherwise an implementation-dependent mechanism ends the dialogue at the destination end. + +##### Message duplication + +Duplication of a BEGIN message causes two transactions to be opened, as indicated below: each of these transactions has its own local ID, and the same destination ID. The TC-user eventually detects that something is wrong, and both dialogues are aborted. + +The sequence given in Table 16 illustrates a duplication of the BEGIN message in Example E2. + +**Table 16/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVVOKE req
(D1, 1, Test, Class = 1)
TC-BEGIN req
(D1, Address) | | +| | TC-BEGIN ind
(D2, Address)
TC-INVVOKE ind
(D2, 1, Test)
Duplicated BEGIN:
TC-BEGIN ind
(D3, Address)
TC-INVVOKE ind
(D3, 1, Test)
Response to the first Begin
TC-INVVOKE req
(D2, 2, 1, Option-select, Class = 1)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D2)
Response to the second Begin
TC-INVVOKE req
(D3, 2, 1, Option-select, Class = 1)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D3) | +| TC-CONTINUE ind
(D1)
TC-INVVOKE ind
(D1, 2, 1, Option-select)
TC-user considers that this invocation is abnormal, and may reject it, or abort one of the dialogues:
TC-U-ABORT req
(D1, Cause) | | +| | TC-U-ABORT ind
(D3, Cause) | +| Time | | + +At that moment, there is still one dialogue (with local ID D2) at TC-user B's side, but no dialogue at A's side. TC-user B will receive an indication from TC when operation 2 of dialogue D2 times-out with no reply (TC-L-CANCEL ind), and may then decide to abort D2. Note that the situation would be more difficult to detect, had TC-user B not invoked a Class 1 operation. + +Duplication of a CONTINUE message is not detected by TC. + +When an END message is duplicated, the second message is received with an ID which does not correspond to an active dialogue: TC reacts by discarding the duplicate message. + +##### **Missequencing of messages** + +When the missequenced messages involve neither the beginning, nor the end of a dialogue, missequencing is not detected by TC, and may result in component missequencing, to which TC + +would react as indicated in 2.4.3. + +When a message indicating dialogue continuation arrives after a message indicating the end of the same dialogue, it is not delivered, and causes TC to abort the dialogue; the TC-user will probably detect the loss when receiving a premature dialogue end indication. If the application needs to recover from this case, a new dialogue should be started. + +##### Message corruption + +When receiving a corrupted message, TC reacts as indicated in Recommendation Q.774. + +Table 17 shows the sequence of primitives when TC decides to abort the dialogue after receiving a corrupted message in Example E2. + +**Table 17/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | TC-user B | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TC-INVOKED req
(D1, 1, Test, Class = 1)
TC-BEGIN req
(D1, Address) | | +| | TC-BEGIN ind
(D2, Address)
TC-INVOKED ind
(D2, 1, Test)
TC-INVOKED req
(D2, 2, 1, Option-select, Class = 1)
TC-CONTINUE req
(D2) | +| Corrupted message:
TC-P-ABORT ind
(D1, Cause) | TC-P-ABORT ind
(D2, Cause) | +| Time | | + +#### 3.2.1.5 Relations between dialogue and component handling + +The following gives some guidelines on when dialogue end can be requested; if these are not respected, TC will not refuse the request for dialogue end. + +The problems that may result from the collision of messages requesting dialogue end have been considered above. + +Normal end should not be requested when: + +- there are operation invocations pending for the dialogue; +- the application protocol anticipates that replies being transmitted with the termination request could be rejected. + +Many applications might not define recovery scenarios in response to a rejected reply. This legitimizes the transmission of replies or of Class 4 operations in a message indicating dialogue end. The other applications should either use the connection-oriented network service approach, or end the dialogue with a message containing no component, that would be sent only when a reject indication can no longer be received. + +It is recommended that an operation for which a reply is expected not be sent in an END message (i.e. that the TC-user does not issue a TC-END req primitive to trigger the associated component). It + +should be noted that this is not a requirement of the TC protocol nor, except as a sensible guideline, of the TC-user. If a TC-user chooses to send an invoke component for an operation of Class 1, 2 or 3 in an END message, it has no pathological implications for the peer TC protocol machines or the TC-users. It is a local matter on how the performing side discards any components generated as a result of performing the operation when there is no active dialogue. Indeed, the fact that the TC-user invoking the operation has chosen to include it in an END message means that it has decided for this instance to override the operation's inherent semantics and does not care to be told if the operation could be performed or not. + +#### 3.2.1.6 Addressing issues + +The TC-user initiating a dialogue must give the Destination Address and Originating Address to TC. The TC-user providing the Originating Address is responsible for giving this address in such a form that the remote TC can use it, without checking, to reach it. + +TC above connectionless SCCP uses any of the addressing options provided by the SCCP. So any combination of types of address for the destination and Origination addresses is allowed. + +During the establishment of a dialogue the combination of addresses may be optimized by both the B-side TC-user and TC. + +The optional originating address parameter in the first TC-CONTINUE request primitive can be used to change the address which should be used for routing the subsequent messages associated with the dialogue. The actual destination itself should not be changed by this modification. If a new destination is to be reached, the dialogue should be terminated and a new one started to the new destination. + +Example of address changes which do not modify the actual destination are: + +- Initial address was a global title, subsequent address is a PC and SSN for the same destination to allow optimal routing (generally not crossing network boundary). +- A general global title is used to select a database from a set of replicated databases. The responding database returns its own specific Global Title. + +#### 3.2.1.7 Quality of Service + +The dialogue handling request primitives allow the TC-user to request a particular Quality of Service from the network layer. If no specific request is made by the TC-user, default options are selected by SCCP (i.e. no return option, no sequencing). + +If sequence control is requested, the TC-user is also responsible for providing information enabling the network layer to identify a flow of related messages to be delivered in sequence. + +It is recommended that sequence control be requested by TC-users when using the TC-RESULT-NL services. + +When the return option is requested, the TC-user is notified of the non-delivery of the associated message, through the TC-NOTICE ind primitive. + +Although the TC-NOTICE ind is primarily intended to be processed by a management function (e.g. when it indicates that a failure occurred during the translation of a global title), there are cases where the return option may be requested in a TC-BEGIN req or TC-UNI req primitive for determining whether the destination Application Entity (identified by the subsystem number in the destination address) exists at the receiving entity. In such a case, the TC-NOTICE ind might be interpreted in real time. + +In the following example, the TC-user A which resides in a local exchange starts a look-ahead procedure before setting up a call. It requests the return option when issuing the TC-BEGIN req to + +open a dialogue towards the destination local exchange B. The look-ahead procedure is not implemented in node B. Hence, the subsystem number which corresponds to the look-ahead procedure does not exist and the SCCP in node B returns the SCCP message which contained the BEGIN message. The TC-user A is confirmed via the TC-NOTICE ind primitive and starts a basic call (circuit) establishment procedure. + +**Table 18/Q.775** + +| TC-user A | | TC-user B | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| Call processing starts
TC-INVVOKE req
(D1, 1, LookAhead)
TC-BEGIN req (D1, return
option, Dest = B-Address,
Orig = A-Address) | | | +| | UNITDATA (return option,
B-Address, A-Address, BEGIN) | | +| | | SSN-B does not exist | +| | UNITDATA SERVICE
(Return cause, A-Address,
B-Address, BEGIN) | | +| N-NOTICE ind (D1, return cause,
Dest = A-Address, Orig = B-
Address) | | | + +### 3.2.2 Unstructured dialogue + +A Unidirectional message will contain only Class 4 operation invocations or reports of protocol errors in such invocations. Multiple components can be transmitted in a Unidirectional message provided that the maximum message size of a message is not exceeded. + +## 3.3 Enhanced dialogue control facilities + +### 3.3.1 Overview + +As the number of signalling applications using TC grows, it will become necessary to be able to differentiate between them during an instance of communication – particularly when a number of them reside at the same location within a SS No. 7 node. + +The ability to signal at the start of the dialogue which application protocol (among potentially many) is involved in the subsequent exchange of messages is provided by the optional functions and protocol of the Dialogue Portion. The optional Dialogue Portion allows the negotiation of the Application Context and, as a further option within it, the transparent transfer of user data which are not components. The latter might be used to convey, for example, initialization data, versions of user protocols, further refinement of the application context, passwords, etc. + +### 3.3.2 Use of the Application-Context + +The TC-user which begins a dialogue can propose an application-context to its peer by including an application-context-name in the TC-BEGIN req primitive. The application-context refers to the set of ASEs and the associated coordinating rules which may be required during the dialogue. + +If the Application-context-name is acceptable, the responding TC-user can either decide to continue or terminate the dialogue in a normal manner. Except if it requests a prearranged termination, it shall include the same AC-name in the first (or unique) dialogue handling request primitive it uses. + +If the AC-name is not acceptable, the TC-user may elect to: + +- i) Discard the received components and issue a TC-U-ABORT req primitive to indicate that it refuses the dialogue. It shall include an application-context-name in this primitive which is either the one received or an alternative one to be used by the dialogue-initiator to make a new attempt. TC does not provide a standard feature to enable the TC-user to propose more than one alternative AC-name. However, such a procedure can be defined outside the scope of TC using the user-information parameter (see 3.3.3). +- ii) Continue the dialogue but indicate that it makes use of an alternative AC [e.g. one which does not use the ASE(s) it does not support], by including another application-context-name in the first TC-CONTINUE req primitive. The received components may or may not be discarded, depending on prearranged agreement between TC-users. +- iii) Terminate the dialogue in a normal manner but indicate that the response(s) included in the END message are based on an alternative AC [e.g. one which does not use the ASE(s) it does not support], by including another application-context-name in the TC-END req primitive. + +The TC-user may also provide an application-context-name when using the TC-UNI service. In such a case the AC-Name indicates to the peer TC-user how to interpret the received components. + +It is important to note that the application context information conveyed in the dialogue handling APDUs is a name of the type OBJECT IDENTIFIER. Such a name is a reference to a specification (document) where the description of the application context is provided. Such a document can make references to other specifications where, for instance, the abstract syntax of some application protocol is provided. Such specifications can be provided in some formal or semi-formal notation, or plain text. + +The specification of application contexts, their semantics, the assignment of an object identifier value and the dissemination of this information to all parties that wish to communicate is the process of registering an application context. In the case where application contexts are registered as a part of ISDN signalling Recommendations, an example of a typical value might be {ccitt recommendation q xxx ac-name(y)} for the yth application context described in Recommendation q.xxx. + +While in principle, it is possible for the application context description to be very detailed, and to add new application contexts to cover every situation that may occur, it may be easier to maintain such specifications if the number of application contexts are kept within reasonable limits. For example, let us assume that a particular application context name refers to the combined use of ASEs A and B. In certain circumstances, it may be necessary to signal that only a subset of the capabilities of A and/or B will be used for a particular instance of communications. Instead of registering a new application context name to cover this case, the same information can be conveyed in some mutually acceptable syntax in the user information field of the AARQ and AARE APDUs. + +### 3.3.3 Transfer of user data + +TC dialogue handling primitives allow the TC-user to request TC to transfer information not related to component handling facilities (i.e. not based on the Remote Operation paradigm). This information is carried either in the user-information field of dialogue control PDUs or directly in the dialogue portion, once the dialogue is established. + +A typical situation where such facility is required is at dialogue establishment to send some initialization data to the peer (refinement of the application-context, authentication data, + +identification of a destination sub-process within the TC-user, etc.). + +In addition, this facility can be used for application context-negotiation: when the TC-user refuses a dialogue (user-abort in dialogue pending state with abort-reason = application-context-not-supported), it can insert a list of alternative application-context-name in the user data field of the TC-U-ABORT req primitive. These names are then carried as part of the user-data of the dialogue protocol data unit (ABRT). The TC-user which is at the origin of the dialogue establishment request can make a new attempt with one of these contexts. + +In order to use this facility the two TC-users will have to define the syntax and semantics of the information to be conveyed, if any, in each dialogue APDU for every application context. As the ASN.1 type of this user information is EXTERNAL, the syntax of this information can be written using ASN.1 or any other user specific notation. The manner in which this information is encoded can also be user-specific. The EXTERNAL type allows the embedding of a data value from one Abstract Syntax (in this case some user-specific syntax) within another (that of the dialogue APDUs). + +Recommendation X.208 defines the EXTERNAL type as follows: + +``` +EXTERNAL ::= [UNIVERSAL 8] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE { + direct-reference OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL, + indirect-reference INTEGER OPTIONAL, + data-value-descriptor ObjectDescriptor OPTIONAL, + encoding CHOICE { + single-ASN1-type [0] ANY, + octet-aligned [1] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING, + arbitrary [2] IMPLICIT BIT STRING } +``` + +Of the three forms of reference to identify the type and encoding of the data value that is contained by the EXTERNAL construction, the TC-user must use the direct-reference. The direct-reference-name will provide the key to identifying both the abstract syntax of the data value and the encoding rules which apply to it. The indirect-reference is used to identify the Presentation Context, the use of which is not supported at present in SS No. 7 signalling. In addition to the direct-reference, the TC-user may also provide an explicit description of the data value in an informal notation through the use of the data-value-descriptor. + +If the external data value is a single ASN.1 type and the Basic Encoding Rules are used to encode this value, any of the choices for the "encoding" field can be used. If the agreed-to encoding of this data value results in an integral number of octets, the encoding choice can use either the "octet-aligned" or "arbitrary" encoding. If the agreed-to encoding of this external data value does not result in an integral number of octets, then the encoding choice of "arbitrary" should be used. + +As the protocol allows a SEQUENCE OF EXTERNAL to be present in the optional user information field of the dialogue control APDUs, the two TC-users are not restricted, when defining an application context, to any particular number in the sequence. (If the segmentation is not provided by the SCCP, TC-users will have to ensure that the Signalling System No. 7 message size restriction is not violated.) + +### 3.3.4 Backward compatibility issues + +The new functions and protocol described in the above subclauses are optional and the specification of their protocol procedures in Recommendations Q.771 through Q.774 are easily distinguishable and can be easily removed from procurement documents, implementation specifications and interface specifications between networks which use these Recommendations as a basis. In such a case, one is left with the TC messages defined in the 1988 Recommendations. No network is obliged to support these new features if it offers no services that require these capabilities. + +A node supporting the 1988 version of TC will not understand the APDUs associated with the Application Context generated by a node conforming to the 1992 Recommendation (or any latter version) and will therefore abort the transaction using the P-ABORT cause "incorrect transaction portion". If the TC-user at a node which supports TC conforming to the 1992 Recommendation (or any latter version) receives an Abort message with the above-mentioned cause in response to a dialogue initiation using Application Context information, it must interpret it, at least in the situations where a network supports a mixture of TC implementations based on the 1992 Recommendation (or any latter version) and the 1988 Recommendations, as the result of communicating with a node that supports only the 1988 TC Recommendations and not as the result of a true syntax error (which is an extremely unlikely event). The TC-user may therefore attempt a retransmission of the message without the additional Application Context information provided, of course, that this information is not crucial to the application. + +It is likely that there will be a period of time during which a network supports both TC implementations conforming to the 1988 Recommendations and to the 1992 Recommendation (or any latter version), as well as applications that will or will not require the support of the Application Context mechanism. Deployment of such capabilities is outside the scope of standards, but it should be kept in mind when deploying services if the inefficiency of transmitting the initial message twice is to be avoided. + +# **4 Guidance for writing TC-users protocol specifications** + +## **4.1 Introduction** + +Recommendation Q.1400 describes how Application Service Elements (ASEs), Application-Contexts (ACs) and Application Entities (AEs) are structured and how an AE is addressed in Signalling System No. 7. This clause illustrates that architecture, considering the functional decomposition of an application, and describes how AEs, ACs, ASEs, operations and errors should be defined. + +## **4.2 Decomposition of functionality** + +### **4.2.1 Application process and application entity** + +A signalling Application Process (AP) communicates through a portion of its software devoted exclusively to communications which is called the Application Entity (AE). An AE, therefore, contains all the functions needed to enable the communications between distributed APs. To summarize subclause 4.1/Q.1400, an AE type is a collection of application-specific communications protocols. The definition of the AE type is a local matter. An AE is the realization of the corresponding AE type at a physical entity. + +### **4.2.2 Application service element** + +On many occasions, it is found that the communications functions for a variety of applications can be grouped into integrated sets of actions such that each such set can be used in more than one AE. Such an integrated set of actions that has the potential of being used in several AEs is called an Application Service Element (ASE). Of course, there are always some application-specific communications functions that can only be used to fulfil the communications needs of the specific application for which it has been defined. + +TC provides a generic means for all signalling applications to communicate using the remote operations paradigm over a connectionless network service. + +A TC-user ASE includes a collection of remote operations that, together with TC, collectively + +provide some overall communications protocol to a signalling application. The ASE definition also specifies which peer TC-user may invoke which operation and in which order. If either TC-user may invoke any of the operations, the ASE is said to be symmetric. The means by which operations are defined and grouped is described in 4.5. + +From the perspective of a TC-user, the mechanism for obtaining the services of a TC-user ASE is the invocation of the latter's operations. Each operation provides a part of the ASE's service in an inherently asymmetric manner as it is invoked by one TC-user and executed by another remote peer. However, the TC-users are not always asymmetric (i.e. one limited to always performing operations and the other to invoking them) but may each be able to invoke or perform the same or different operations. [Indeed the service interface from the TC-user's point of view (which is the subject of further study) may appear quite different from that provided by TC. For example, the invocation of a class 1 operation may be seen by the TC-user as the invocation of a confirmed service while, from the perspective of the TC service interface, it is the consequence of two unconfirmed services, viz. TC-INVOKED and TC-RESULT.] + +Some application contexts may require the use of a specific TC-user ASE involved in the establishment and release of a dialogue. Such an ASE embodies the knowledge of two specific operations (known as bind and unbind operations) which form a connection-package. + +Other applications may also require the use of additional ASEs which are not based on the use of operations. The PDUs of such ASEs are conveyed in the dialogue portion. + +### 4.2.3 Communications between peer AEs/ASEs + +Communications between two AEs at different nodes are possible as long as the two AEs are made aware of their peer's address and support a common Application Context. An application context is the specification of the rules, procedures and behaviour at the external interface between two AEs during an instance of communication between them. The means to specify an application context is defined in 4.3. + +For TC-based applications using the 1988 (*Blue Book*) Recommendations, which rely on the SCCP UNITDATA service, the SCCP SubSystem Number (SSN) provides the role of routing an SS No. 7 message to the AE within a physical entity which supports the precise application protocol being used and also, implicitly, the encoding being used for its messages. That is, the SSN, in addition to being a piece of addressing information, also implicitly defined the application context (roughly, the message set) and the presentation context (the encoding of the messages). + +With the introduction of the protocol for the Dialogue Portion of TC, which contains the application context negotiation mechanism, there is no direct relationship between the AE and the SSN. The application context allows an explicit way of recognizing granularity at the application layer. As (see 6.1.3/Q.1400) one AE may support any number of ASEs, the Application Context identifies the appropriate set of ASEs to be used during the SS No. 7 dialogue. + +These points are illustrated in the figure below. + +![Four diagrams (Figure A, Figure B, Figure C, Figure D) showing different local implementations of ASE X. Each diagram shows an outer box representing an AE type, accessed by a distinct SSN. Inside each box is a TC (Transport Component) and one or more TC-user ASEs. Figure A: ASE X and ASE Y are grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 1. Figure B: ASE X is grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 2. Figure C: ASE Y is grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 3. Figure D: ASE X and ASE Z are grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 4. A reference number T1180030-96 is shown next to SSN 4.](e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg) + +Four diagrams (Figure A, Figure B, Figure C, Figure D) showing different local implementations of ASE X. Each diagram shows an outer box representing an AE type, accessed by a distinct SSN. Inside each box is a TC (Transport Component) and one or more TC-user ASEs. Figure A: ASE X and ASE Y are grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 1. Figure B: ASE X is grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 2. Figure C: ASE Y is grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 3. Figure D: ASE X and ASE Z are grouped with TC, accessed by SSN 4. A reference number T1180030-96 is shown next to SSN 4. + +Each outer box shows an AE type, which consists of several ASEs, one of which, in the case of interest to us, is always TC. ASEs X, Y and Z represent various TC-user ASEs, such as those for supplementary services. Each AE type is accessed by a distinct SSN. + +Figures A and B show two possible local implementations of ASE X. In one case, shown in Figure A, ASE X has been placed together with ASE Y in an AE type accessed by a particular (possibly locally selected) SSN. In Figure B, ASE X is kept separate. These are two possible implementations for the services provided by ASE X and this choice is not subject to standardization. In Figure D, for instance, some other implementation has chosen to group together ASE X with a completely different ASE, ASE Z, to form an AE type accessed at SSN 4. + +Note that the AE types in the above figures are different to emphasize that AE types are *not* standardized, so that each node does not have to choose the same implementation. Communications to provide the services of ASE X can still take place between two different implementations, one as in Figure A, say, and another as in Figures B or D so long as the SCCP routing data are correctly populated (which is a network management and administration issue) and as long as the operations/parameters/error codes of ASE X are distinct from those of ASEs Y and Z (which is a matter decided at specification time; see 4.5.8 for details). + +The only subject of standardization is the external behaviour of a system. Application contexts define the visible external behaviour between two communicating AEs. Some ACs may be standardized. ASEs are often standardized to permit their reuse in many different application contexts. + +## 4.3 How to specify an application context + +During an instance of communication, the interactions between two AEs as well as the interactions between the ASEs within an AE are governed by the rules of an application-context (AC). + +The definition of an AC should contain, at least: + +- a general description; +- a definition of the complete application protocol between the peer AEs by: + - i) identifying each ASE used by the AC, and indicating which of the peer AEs initiates the service; + - ii) any coordinating rules between these ASEs (e.g. concatenation of the PDUs from different TC-user ASEs, any constraints on the order in which operations from different TC-user ASEs may be invoked, etc.) beside the rules which are an inherent part of the ASE specifications; + - iii) the abstract syntax(es) required by the ASEs; +- any special constraints to ensure that peer AEs with different versions are compatible. + +A name shall be assigned to each application-context. Such a name is a value of type OBJECT IDENTIFIER which is carried (if required) as a value of the application-context-name information element in the dialogue portion. + +Subclause 5.4 specifies an ASN.1 information object class which may be used for defining the static aspect of application contexts based on TC. + +## **4.4 How to specify an ASE** + +A TC-user ASE specification should provide at least: + +- a general description of the purpose of the ASE and its procedures; +- the list of supported operations as well as which side (or both) can invoke which operation; +- any rules on the sequence in which operations may be invoked; +- the detailed description of the procedures; +- how different protocol versions interwork; +- the description of the interactions between the ASE and TC in terms of TC service primitives; +- SDL diagrams. + +The OPERATION-PACKAGE and CONNECT-PACKAGE information object classes defined in Recommendation X.880 may be used for specifying the static aspects of the definition of ASEs which are based on the use of operations. + +## **4.5 How to specify Operations and Errors** + +### **4.5.1 General considerations** + +The set of Operations and Errors which forms a TC user protocol specification can be described using one or several ASN.1 modules. The number of ASN.1 modules to be used is left to the protocol designer and is further discussed in 4.5.5. + +A possible notation for defining Operations and Errors is based on the ASN.1 MACRO facility defined in Recommendation X.208. The OPERATION MACRO and the ERROR MACRO are the data types respectively associated to an Operation and to an Error. However, as the MACRO notation is being phased out from ASN.1, Recommendation X.880 provides an alternative notation using two equivalent information object classes. It also explains how one can migrate from the MACRO notation to the object class notation. + +Each operation (error) belongs to an operation type (error type) which is derived from the OPERATION MACRO (ERROR MACRO) type. + +Each operation type or error type should be given a name (an ASN.1 type reference, which starts with a capital letter). + +Each operation or error should be given a name (an ASN.1 value reference which starts with a lower case letter). + +Recommendation X.219 states that values for a set of operations and errors have to be unique within an abstract syntax. For TC, this currently means that they have to be unique within the scope of a subsystem number, a group of related subsystem numbers or an application-context. + +Type definition can be combined with value allocation or performed in two steps, as illustrated in the following example. + +- Type specification and value assignment are separated: + +``` + +OperationTypeExample1 ::= OPERATION +ARGUMENT ParameterType1 +RESULT ResultType1 +ERRORS { error1, error2 } + +``` + +``` +operationExample1 OperationTypeExample1 ::= localValue 1 +``` + +- Type specification and value assignment are combined: + +``` + +OperationExample1 ::= OPERATION +ARGUMENT ParameterType1 +RESULT ResultType1 +ERRORS { error1, error2 } + ::= localValue 1 + +``` + +Whether it is more appropriate to combine type and by value specifications, as well as the use of global or local value, is further discussed in 4.5.6. + +The notation defined in Recommendation X.880 does not support the two steps' approach. However, the code allocated to an operation or an error can be easily modified using the `recode {}` predefined parameterized operation. In the following example, `operationExample2` is defined as being identical to `operationExample1` (same operation type) but with a different value. + +``` +OperationExample2 ::= recode {operationExample1, 2} +``` + +### 4.5.2 Use of the OPERATION MACRO notation + +#### 4.5.2.1 Use of the type notation + +An Operation type is fully defined as an instance of the OPERATION MACRO type supplemented by an ASN.1 comment indicating the associated timer value. + +The following subclauses provide guidance on the use of the various ASN.1 productions which form the OPERATION MACRO description. + +##### 4.5.2.1.1 Specification of the operation argument + +The following ASN.1 productions indicate how the argument of an operation has to be specified: + +``` + +Parameter ::= ArgKeyword ParameterType | empty +ArgKeyword ::= "PARAMETER" | "ARGUMENT" +ParameterType ::= NamedType | NamedType "OPTIONAL" + +``` + +If information can be provided at Operation invocation, the keyword `PARAMETER` or `ARGUMENT` has to be inserted and followed by the `NamedType` which corresponds to the data structure to be provided, otherwise the keyword shall not be present in the Operation description. + +Both keywords are allowed for backward compatibility purposes with TC-user specifications based on older versions of TC. However, the use of the `"PARAMETER"` keyword is deprecated for defining new applications. + +Although the operation argument is always an optional element of an Invoke component, the specification of the `ParameterType` indicates whether its presence at invocation time is mandatory or optional for the completion of the operation execution. In the latter case, the keyword `"OPTIONAL"` follows the ASN.1 type. + +##### 4.5.2.1.2 Specification of positive outcomes + +The following ASN.1 productions indicate how to specify operations which report success: + +**Result ::= "RESULT" ResultType | empty** +**ResultType ::= ParameterType | empty** + +If information can be returned as a result of a successful Operation execution, the keyword RESULT is to be followed by the NamedType associated with the data structure to be sent. If no information is to be provided but the operation class indicate that the operation report success, the RESULT keyword is to be present in the Operation description but the empty alternative of the Result production is used. If the keyword RESULT is not included in an operation description, this indicates that it does not report success (i.e. Class 2 or 4 operation). + +Although the operation result parameter is always an optional element of a Return Result component, the specification of the ParameterType indicates whether its presence is mandatory or optional from a functional point of view. In the latter case, the keyword "OPTIONAL" follows the ASN.1 type. + +##### 4.5.2.1.3 Associated Errors + +The following ASN.1 productions indicate how to specify operations which report failure: + +**Errors ::= "ERRORS" "{ "ErrorNames" }" | empty** +**ErrorNames ::= ErrorList | empty** +**ErrorList ::= Error | ErrorList "," Error** +**Error ::= value (ERROR) | type** + +If the Operation reports failure, the keyword ERRORS should be included and followed by the list of associated errors, otherwise this keyword should not be present. The errors included in the list can be referenced either using a type reference or a value reference (i.e. an error code). + +##### 4.5.2.1.4 Specification of linked operations + +The following ASN.1 productions indicate how to specify linked operations: + +**LinkedOperations ::= "LINKED" "{ "LinkedOperationNames" }" | empty** +**LinkedOperationNames ::= OperationList | empty** +**OperationList ::= Operation | OperationList "," Operation** +**Operation ::= value (OPERATION) | type** + +If the Operation is the parent operation of a set of linked-operations, the keyword LINKED should be included and followed by the list of child operations. The child operations included in the list can be referenced either using a type reference or a value reference (i.e. an operation code). + +#### 4.5.2.2 Use of the value notation + +The value notation for Operation is either the notation for the value of an element of type INTEGER or the notation for an element of type OBJECT IDENTIFIER. This depends on whether the Operation is allocated a local value or a global value. + +#### 4.5.2.3 Specification of timers + +The timer value associated with an operation type has to be indicated as an ASN.1 comment against the ASN.1 MACRO description of the operation type. + +### 4.5.3 Use of the ERROR MACRO notation + +The type notation for an error is the keyword ERROR optionally followed by the keyword PARAMETER and the ParameterType associated to the information which may be sent as error's parameter. The keyword PARAMETER should not be present if no information is associated with + +the error condition. + +Although the error parameter is always an optional element of a Return Error component, the specification of the ParameterType indicates whether its presence is mandatory or optional from a functional point of view. In the latter case, the keyword "OPTIONAL" follows the ASN.1 type. + +The value notation for an error is either the notation for the value of an element of type INTEGER or the notation for an element of type OBJECT IDENTIFIER. This depends on whether the Operation is allocated a local value or a global value. + +### 4.5.4 Use of the (information object) CLASS notation + +The replacement of the MACRO notation (defined in Recommendation X.209) with the (information object) CLASS notation (defined in Recommendations X.680 to X.683) retains the idea that applications have complex concepts, aspects of which need to be expressed as data structures which are to be conveyed by protocols during communications. Each of these concepts is classified by providing a template, analogous to the MACRO definition, known as an **information object class**. The template for a class shows the attributes of the objects belonging to that class. Recommendations X.680 to X.683 remove the MACRO notation and replace it with the information object CLASS definition. + +#### 4.5.4.1 The OPERATION (information object) CLASS + +Recommendation X.880 defines the OPERATION (information object) CLASS. A slightly modified version is presented in ASN.1 definition below, by removing fields not relevant for TC-based applications. + +The notation defines the template for a class of objects (remote operations) which are assigned the name OPERATION, which consists of ten fields. Each field starts with an ampersand (&), which is an indication that property, and is followed by a field-name beginning with either a lower-case or an upper-case letter. This distinction helps identify the sort of data that may populate the fields when defining an instance of this class. + +Words which are all capitalized are used for standardized keywords such as CLASS and UNIQUE, as well as names to object classes such as OPERATION and ERROR. If a field-name starts with an upper-case letter, it is a placeholder for either an arbitrary ASN.1 type (e.g. &Argument, see ASN.1 below), a set of information objects (e.g. &Errors), or a set of values of some type. If it is a set of information objects, the descriptor of the object class to which they belong follows. If, on the other hand, the field-name starts with a lower-case letter (e.g. &returnResult), it takes the *value* of the ASN.1 type (e.g. BOOLEAN) or an information object class that follows. If a field is marked OPTIONAL, it need not be populated when defining instances of the class. The keyword UNIQUE following a field (e.g. &operationCode) means that the field is a "handle" by which instances of the class in question are identified, and should therefore be unique within any given set or collection of such objects. + +Finally, designers of the ASN.1 notation have permitted a limited amount of user-defined notation through the use of the WITH SYNTAX construct which is appended to the definition of the information object class. It permits a more user-friendly notation for defining instances of a CLASS. In Recommendation X.880, the user-defined syntax for the OPERATION and ERROR CLASSes have deliberately been chosen to strongly resemble the earlier MACRO notation. Subclause 4.5.7 defines the (small) changes that are required to convert an existing operation or error definition from the MACRO definition to one employing the information object CLASS definitions. + +##### **OPERATION ::= CLASS** + +``` + +{ + &ArgumentType OPTIONAL, + &argumentTypeOptional BOOLEAN OPTIONAL, + &ResultType OPTIONAL, + &resultTypeOptional BOOLEAN OPTIONAL, + &returnResult BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, + &Errors ERROR OPTIONAL, + &Linked OPERATION OPTIONAL, + &synchronous BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE, + &alwaysReturns BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, + &operationCode Code UNIQUE OPTIONAL +} + +``` + +##### **WITH SYNTAX** + +``` + +{ + [ARGUMENT &ArgumentType [OPTIONAL + &argumentTypeOptional]] + [RESULT &ResultType [OPTIONAL + &resultTypeOptional]] + [RETURN RESULT &returnResult] + [ERRORS &Errors] + [LINKED &Linked] + [SYNCHRONOUS &synchronous] + [ALWAYS RESPONDS &alwaysReturns] + [CODE &operationCode] +} +Code ::= CHOICE +{ + local INTEGER, + global OBJECT IDENTIFIER +} + +``` + +##### **4.5.4.1.1 Specification of the operation argument** + +The field &Argument is an optional type field where an arbitrary ASN.1 type can be placed to define the argument of the remote operation invoked. The application designer provides the type to be used when defining a specific operation. In the user-defined syntax, the type of the accompanying argument follows the keyword ARGUMENT. + +The field &argumentTypeOptional is an optional value field, which takes the value TRUE if a defined argument may optionally be absent from a functional point of view, or FALSE if it must always be present. In the user-defined syntax, the two cases are shown by the keywords OPTIONAL TRUE (respectively OPTIONAL FALSE) succeeding the type definition of the ARGUMENT. + +##### **4.5.4.1.2 Specification of the operation result** + +The field &ResultType is a type field where an arbitrary ASN.1 type can be placed to define the result of performing the remote operation. The application designer provides the type to be used for the result when defining a specific operation. In the user-defined syntax, the type of the accompanying result follows the keyword RESULT. + +The field &resultTypeOptional is an optional value field, which takes the value TRUE if a defined result may optionally be absent from a functional point of view, or FALSE if it must always be present. In the user-defined syntax, the two cases are shown by the keywords OPTIONAL TRUE (respectively OPTIONAL FALSE) succeeding the type definition of the RESULT. + +##### 4.5.4.1.3 Specification of positive outcomes + +The field &returnResult is an optional value field of type BOOLEAN which specifies whether the positive outcome of a remote operation is always reported. In the user-defined syntax, such a field is recognized by the keyword RETURN RESULT. Its absence implies that the operation always returns a result. + +NOTE – This field ensures the explicit recognition of whether an operation returns upon successful completion, even if a result type is not defined for it. + +##### 4.5.4.1.4 Associated errors + +The field &Errors is an optional field where a set of objects (errors) defined by the CLASS ERROR (see 4.5.5) can be placed to define the set of errors which may be returned if the remote operation fails. In the user-defined syntax, the set of errors, if present, are enclosed within braces "{...}" and follow the keyword ERRORS. + +##### 4.5.4.1.5 Specification of linked operations + +The field &Linked is an optional field where a set of objects (operations) defined by the CLASS OPERATION can be placed to define the set of operations which may be linked to the particular operation being defined. In the user-defined syntax, the set of linked operations, if present, are enclosed within braces "{...}" and follow the keyword LINKED. + +##### 4.5.4.1.6 Synchronous nature of the operation + +The field &synchronous is an optional value field which takes the value TRUE if the operation is synchronous (i.e. the invoker must wait for the operation to return before invoking another on the same performer) or FALSE otherwise. In the user-defined notation, the operation code follows the keyword SYNCHRONOUS. + +NOTE – If an operation is synchronous, the field &alwaysReturns (see 4.5.4.1) must be TRUE. + +TC-user operations are asynchronous. This field has been defined to default to FALSE (i.e. asynchronous) if this keyword is absent; so existing and future TC-user applications need not concern themselves about its presence. However, other operations, such as bind and unbind (see 5.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.2) explicitly use this field in their definitions. + +##### 4.5.4.1.7 Operation code + +The field &operationCode is an optional value field which is either an integer (a "locally" unique value) or an OBJECT IDENTIFIER (a globally unique value), and must be chosen to be different from those of any other operations in a given set of operations. In the user-defined notation, the operation code follows the keyword CODE. + +If an operation code value is not defined, it means that this operation cannot be invoked using the Invoke PDU. An example of such an operation is the bind operation (see 5.2.2.1) which is invoked using the bind-invoke PDU defined in 5.2.2.1.2. + +##### 4.5.4.1.8 Classes of operation + +The field &alwaysReturns is a value field of type BOOLEAN which denotes whether the operation always returns or not. In the user-defined syntax, it is denoted by the true or false value accompanying the keyword ALWAYS RETURNS. If absent, it implies that the operation always returns. + +If an operation always returns, it is of Class 1, or 2, or 3. The field &returnResult helps decide if an operation is of Class 1 or 3. The presence or absence of the field &Errors narrows down the previous choice to Class 1 (respectively Class 3). + +##### 4.5.4.1.9 Specification of timers + +There is no notational means to specify timers for operations except as ASN.1 comments. + +### 4.5.5 The ERROR (information object) CLASS + +Recommendation X.880 defines the ERROR (information object) CLASS. A slightly modified version is presented in ASN.1 description below, by removing a field not relevant for TC-based applications. + +``` +ERROR ::= CLASS +{ + &ParameterType OPTIONAL, + ¶meterTypeOptional BOOLEAN OPTIONAL, + &errorCode Code UNIQUE OPTIONAL +} +WITH SYNTAX +{ + [PARAMETER &ParameterType [OPTIONAL ¶meterTypeOptional]] + [CODE &errorCode] +} +``` + +#### 4.5.5.1 Specification of the parameter accompanying an error + +The field &ParameterType is an optional type field where an arbitrary ASN.1 type can be placed to define the parameter accompanying an error report for an operation invocation. The application designer provides the type to be used when defining a specific error. In the user-defined syntax, the type of the accompanying parameter follows the keyword PARAMETER. + +The field ¶meterTypeOptional is an optional value field, which takes the value TRUE if a defined parameter may optionally be absent from a functional point of view, or FALSE if it must always be present. In the user-defined syntax, the two cases are shown by the keywords OPTIONAL TRUE (respectively OPTIONAL FALSE) succeeding the type definition of the PARAMETER. + +#### 4.5.5.2 Error code + +The field &errorCode is a value field which is either an integer (a "locally" unique value) or an OBJECT IDENTIFIER (a globally unique value), and must be chosen to be different from those of any other errors in any given set of errors. In the user-defined notation, the error code follows the keyword CODE. + +If an error code value is not defined, it means that this error cannot be returned using the Return Error PDU. An example of such an error is the error indicating the ability to bind (see 5.2.2.1) which is returned using the bind-error PDU defined in 5.2.2.1.2. + +### 4.5.6 Examples of Operations and Errors description + +This subclause illustrates the part of protocol specification which deals with Operations and associated Errors definitions for a simple TC-user ASE. The purpose of Operations and Errors is briefly described in textual form. Then Operations and Errors, as well as the associated data types, are formally described in one ASN.1 module. + +The following example is based on fictitious freephone like dialogue, between a switching centre and a freephone database. + +#### 4.5.6.1 Operations and Errors purposes + +##### 4.5.6.1.1 Provide routing information + +This operation is invoked by a switching centre to request a remote entity to provide routing + +information in order to establish a call to a subscriber. The routing information provided may be a forwarded-to number and may depend on the calling party number and/or the requested basic service. In the latest case the `getCallingPartyNumber` child operation is invoked. + +##### 4.5.6.1.2 Get calling party number + +This operation is invoked by a network element to request a switching centre to provide the calling party number associated with a call set-up request. + +##### 4.5.6.1.3 Invalid called number + +This error is returned by a network element to indicate that the received called number does not comply with the supported numbering scheme. + +##### 4.5.6.1.4 Subscriber not reachable + +This error is returned by a network element to indicate that there is currently no routing information available corresponding to a called number. + +##### 4.5.6.1.5 Called barred + +This error is returned by a network element to indicate that a call cannot be set up because the calling number conflicts with the barring conditions attached to the called party. + +##### 4.5.6.1.6 Calling party number not available + +This error is returned by a switching centre to indicate that the calling party number cannot be provided. + +##### 4.5.6.1.7 Processing failure + +This error is returned by a network element to indicate a processing failure. + +#### 4.5.6.2 ASN.1 specification + +The following ASN.1 module specifies the operations and associated errors and data types which correspond to the protocol elements described above. In this example type definition of Operations and Errors is combined with value assignment. + +``` +TCAP-Examples { ccitt recommendation q 775 modules(2) examples(2) version1(1) } +DEFINITIONS ::= +BEGIN + +IMPORTS OPERATION, ERROR +FROM TCAPMessages { ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) messages(1) version2(2) }; + +provideRoutingInformation OPERATION +ARGUMENT RequestArgument + +RESULT RoutingInformation + +ERRORS { invalidCalledNumber, + subscriberNotReachable, + callBarred, + processingFailure } + +LINKED { getCallingPartyAddress } +-- timer T-pi = 10 s +::= localValue : 1 +``` + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|

getCallingPartyAddress

RESULT

ERRORS

-- timer T-gp = 5 s

::= localValue : 2

invalidCalledNumber ERROR ::= localValue : 1

subscriberNotReachable ERROR ::= localValue : 2

calledBarred ERROR ::= localValue : 3

callingPartyAddressNotAvailable ERROR ::= localValue : 4

processingFailure ERROR ::= localValue : 5

-- data types

RequestArgument ::= SEQUENCE {

    calledNumber          IsdnNumber,

    basicService        BasicServiceIndicator OPTIONAL

}

RoutingInformation ::= CHOICE {

    reroutingNumber     [0] IMPLICIT IsdnNumber,

    forwardedToNumber   [1] IMPLICIT IsdnNumber }

BasicServiceIndicator ::= ENUMERATED {

    speech (0),

    unrestrictedDigital (1) }

CallingPartyAddress ::= IsdnNumber

IsdnNumber ::= SEQUENCE {

    typeOfAddress         TypeOfAddress,

    digits                TelephonyString }

TypeOfAddress ::= ENUMERATED {

    national (0),

    international (1),

    private (2) }

TelephonyString ::= IA5String (FROM ("0" "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6" "7" "8" "9" "*" "#")) (SIZE (1..15))

END

|

OPERATION

CallingPartyAddress

{ callingPartyAddressNotAvailable,

processingFailure }

| +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### 4.5.7 Moving from the MACRO notation to the (information object) CLASS notation and use of ASN.1 modules + +All TC-user specifications have hitherto been written using the ASN.1 MACRO notation defined in Recommendation X.208. This subclause shows how the use of these macros can be transformed into the use of the information object CLASS notation. As mentioned in 4.5.4, the user-defined syntax of the OPERATION/ERROR CLASSes have been deliberately chosen in Recommendation X.880 to allow the greatest commonality with the previous construct. From a user's point of view, there are a number of small changes, some of which are a re-positioning of various symbols while others allow for a greater indication within the notation of aspects of an operation which, in the MACRO notation, could only be expressed as comments. + +In this subclause, the *provideRoutingInformation* operation and the *processingFailure* error of 4.5.6.2 are shown in both notations. In each case, on the left-hand side, which shows the macro + +notation, symbols underlined are to be deleted to form the new notation (the right-hand side), while symbols in ***bold italics*** are to be inserted into the old notation to form the new notation. + +| | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 provideRoutingInformation OPERATION ::= {     ARGUMENT RequestArgument     RESULT RoutingInformation     ERRORS {invalidCalledNumber         / subscriberNotReachable         / callBarred         / processingFailure }     LINKED     { getCallingPartyAddress }     ::= CODE    local : 1 } 
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 provideRoutingInformation OPERATION ::= {     ARGUMENT RequestArgument     RESULT RoutingInformation     ERRORS {invalidCalledNumber         / subscriberNotReachable         / callBarred         / processingFailure }     LINKED     { getCallingPartyAddress }     CODE    local : 1 } 
| +|
 processingFailure          ERROR ::= {      ::= CODE    local : 5 } 
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 processingFailure          ERROR ::= {      CODE        local : 5 } 
| + +#### Use of ASN.1 modules + +A module is an ASN.1 construction where a protocol designer collects several types and values definitions. + +Theoretically, ASN.1 imposes no constraints upon the number of modules used to define a protocol. All the definitions may be contained in one module or many modules. However, if definitions contained in one module are required in another (e.g. the error used by an operation is defined in another module), then the corresponding definition is made available by EXPORTing it from the module in which it is defined and IMPORTing it into the module in which it is used. This applies to all ASN.1 objects, whether defined by type or value. + +This gives the application designer the freedom to structure the modules according to needs, or a self-imposed convention. For example, a single module could contain all the definitions particularly in a single AE, single ASE environment. Alternatively, there could be one module for each ASE definition, each module containing all the operation and errors used exclusively by that ASE. At the other extreme, all the operations and errors could be defined in one "central registry" module and exported for use in the other modules where the ASEs are defined. + +It may be necessary to employ a "mixed mode" of ASN.1 notation when defining modules. This arises from the use of the ASN.1:1994 notation defined in Recommendations X.680 to X.683 for some cases where definitions are borrowed from existing ITU-T Recommendations employing the new notation. An example of this is the use of some concepts of ROSE (Recommendation X.880) such as the static definitions of application contexts (see 5.1.1), and the use of X.500 Directory operations for particular Intelligent Network interfaces. It is important to ensure that older modules written in ASN.1:1989 do not have to be rewritten, and can coexist with modules that are written using constructs of ASN.1:1994. + +Detailed guidelines for working in this "mixed mode" are provided in Recommendation X.680, but are summarized here: + +- A specification may comprise modules in both ASN.1:1989 and ASN.1:1994. However, any given module MUST conform to either the 1989 or the 1994 notation, and comments may be included to indicate which version of the notation is being used in which module. + +- Type and value references may be imported into an ASN.1:1994 module from an ASN.1:1989 module so long as: + - a) ASN.1:1989 MACRO definitions are NOT imported into a module using ASN.1:1994 notation; and + - b) identifiers for SET, SEQUENCE and CHOICE values are present. +- Type and value references may be imported into an ASN.1:1989 module from an ASN.1:1994 module so long as: + - a) new ASN.1:1994 types (CHARACTER STRING, UniversalString, BMPString, EMBEDDED-PDV) are NOT imported. + +### 4.5.8 Allocation and Management of Operation and Error Codes + +#### 4.5.8.1 General considerations + +Subclauses 4.1 to 4.5.4 describe how ACs, ASEs, operations and errors may be specified. Also discussed is how ASEs use operations and errors, and how the ASEs themselves are used in defining the application context between two peer AEs. + +ACs and ASEs are convenient modelling and specification tools used to aid in the design of application protocols. At the end, during a dialogue between two TC-users, any TC-based application protocol is made up of the exchange of data values for operations and errors types identified by, respectively, their operation or error codes. The only requirement of Signalling System No. 7 (and ROSE) is that operation and error codes be unique within an Abstract syntax. As there is currently no way to explicitly signal the abstract syntax to which a given operation or error code belongs, the application designer has to ensure that these codes are unique within the scope a subsystem number or of an application-context. In the case where the scope of operation and error codes is an application-context, the protocol designer shall also ensure that the application-context-name is conveyed to the remote end using the protocol of the dialogue portion. + +There are many possible schemes regarding the allocation and management of operation and error codes and many factors need to be considered. Two major considerations are AC/ASE structure and the reuse of operations and errors. + +#### 4.5.8.2 Import and Export of Operations and Errors + +As any other ASN.1 type, Operations and Errors can be exported and imported between ASN.1 modules. This method can be used when there is a need to define an operation whose type corresponds to an existing operation but when the value to be allocated to this new operation is different from the one allocated to the existing one (i.e. for uniqueness purposes). This is illustrated by the following example, where objectIdentifier1 and objectIdentifier2 are fictitious identifiers. + +``` + +ExportingModule { objectIdentifier1 } DEFINITIONS ::= +BEGIN +EXPORTS operation1, OperationTypeA, error1, ErrorTypeA; + +IMPORTS OPERATION, ERROR FROM TCAPMessages +{ ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) messages(1) version2(2) }; + +operation1 OPERATION +ARGUMENT ParameterType1 +RESULT ResultType1 +ERRORS { error1 } +::= localValue 1 + +OperationTypeA ::= OPERATION + +``` + +| | | +|----------|----------------| +| ARGUMENT | ParameterTypeA | +| RESULT | ResultTypeA | +| ERRORS | { ErrorTypeA } | + +operation2 OperationTypeA ::= localValue : 2 + +error1 ERROR + PARAMETER DiagnosticType1 + ::= localValue : 1 + +ErrorTypeA ::= ERROR + PARAMETER DiagnosticTypeA + +error2 ErrorTypeA ::= localValue : 2 + +*-- Note that ParameterType1, ResultType1, ParameterTypeA, ResultTypeA,* + +*-- DiagnosticType1 and DiagnosticTypeA have to be defined somewhere if they are not defined* + +*-- within this module, they have to be imported from the module where they are defined.* + +END + +ImportingModule { objectIdentifier2 } DEFINITIONS ::= + +BEGIN + +IMPORTS OPERATION, ERROR FROM TCAPMessages + +{ ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) messages(1) version2(2) }; + +operation1, OperationTypeA, error1, ErrorTypeA + +FROM ExportingModule { objectIdentifier1 }; + +operation2 OPERATION + +ARGUMENT ParameterTypeX *-- to be defined somewhere in the module* + +::= localValue : 2 + +error2 ERROR ::= localValue : 2 + +*-- Value 2 is already in use. Thus value 3 is allocated to the imported objects* + +operationA OperationTypeA ::= localValue : 3 + +errorA ErrorTypeA ::= localValue : 3 + +END + +#### 4.5.8.3 Impact of ASE/AC structure on operation and error code administration + +Regarding the AC/ASE structure the options are: + +##### 4.5.8.3.1 Monolithic approach – One AC, one ASE + +Conceptually, this is the simplest approach. The application protocol is defined by an AC which comprises only one ASE (in addition to TC). All the operations used in that ASE could be defined in one ASN.1 module, which also contains the definition of the ASE's operation package and of the AC. Within the protocol, all operations and errors are identified uniquely by being assigned a unique local (integer) value. + +The advantage of this scheme is its simplicity. Its disadvantage is that it does not permit to identify independent building blocks which can evolve separately within the AC definition. + +##### 4.5.8.3.2 One AC comprising more than one ASE + +In defining an application protocol the designer may choose to structure an AC such that it comprises two or more ASEs. For example, it may be decided to group those elements of protocol concerned with user authentication into one separate ASE (which could be reused in another protocol), and those concerned with the actual data base enquiry into another ASE. This can facilitate modular system design but, when all the constituent ASEs are combined to form the AC, care must be taken + +to ensure that different operations/errors contained in different ASEs have not been allocated the same value. + +Using the same operation/error in two different ASEs within the same AC does not cause a problem. If the values allocated to this same operation are the same in each case, then within the protocol there will be only one operation/error associated with that value. If different values are allocated, then although it will appear in the protocol that there are two different operations/errors, in the implementation of the application these two different values will cause the same operation/error to be invoked/identified. + +However, if within the same AC, an operation defined in one ASE is allocated the same value as a different operation in another ASE, then this will obviously cause a problem. When an ASE is used in only one AC, a simple code allocation scheme can avoid this problem. But when the same ASE is used in several ACs, this can become difficult to administer, and the only "safe" approaches are those described in i) to iii) below. + +- i) Two or more ASE protocols share common local operation/error values: + +When the ASEs are defined, the values are allocated by the protocol designer(s) so that no clashes can occur. This requires a coordination in the tasks of defining the ASE. This means that the ASEs share the same abstract syntax. + +A disadvantage of this scheme is that if one of the ASEs is used in more than one context (i.e. together with different set of ASEs), it is more or less impossible to avoid value clashes for any combination. + +- ii) Assign global values (object identifiers) to operations and errors: + +Since an object identifier is unique throughout SS No. 7, there is no danger of clashes in values when an ASE is combined with any other one. + +One of the disadvantages of this scheme is that when encoded, an object identifier is longer than a simple integer. + +- iii) Sharing operations/errors by assigning types when defining operations/errors, instead of values: + +This approach assumes that type definition of the operations and errors have been defined independently from value assignment. + +When a protocol designer defines an application-context, it collects all the operation and error types used by the required ASEs and allocates suitable values so that no clashes occur. + +By doing this, one can consider that the protocol designer defines a new set of ASEs isomorphic to the existing ones which differ only by the values of their operations and errors. + +#### **4.5.8.4 Reuse of operation and errors** + +Regardless of the number of ASEs included in a protocol, there are situations where it appears suitable to include an existing operation or error when defining a new ASE. + +The operation or error can be reused in one of the following manners. + +The operation is imported in one of the module defining one of the ASEs. This is only feasible if it is ensured that there is no value clashes. + +This can be achieved if: + +- i) There is a central registry of operation and errors which uses only values in a reserved range never used by ASE specific operations. This approach imposes a constraint on TC-user ASEs which may not be satisfied in a broader environment (i.e. if Operations or Errors from + +DSS 1 or ISO protocols are to be used). + +- ii) The operation and errors have been allocated global values. The disadvantage of this approach is that a global value requires more octets to be encoded than a local one and requires official registration within the Object Identifier Tree. +- iii) The operation or error type is imported in one of the modules defining one of the ASEs, where a suitable value is assigned. This assumes that the exporting protocol uses the two-step approach for the definition of operation and errors or that the required operations and error types are included in a central registry. +- iv) The operation or error is completely re-defined. Although part of the original definition (e.g. the type of the argument) may be imported. + +## 4.6 Data types specifications + +### 4.6.1 General + +As stated in the previous clause, the type of the information which may accompany an operation invocation, the report of a success or the report of a failure is specified as an ASN.1 data type. This is also valid for the information which may be exchanged as user data of the dialogue portion. + +This data type can be a simple built-in type (e.g. integer type, boolean type, null type, octet string type, etc.) or structured one (e.g. sequence type, sequence-of type, choice type, etc). It may also be derived from these types by sub-typing (e.g. size constraint, value range) or tagging. + +### 4.6.2 Use of tags + +ASN.1 provides a tagging mechanism which allows for defining a type isomorphic to an existing one which thus differs only by virtue of its tag. + +As clearly stated in Recommendation X.208 (ASN.1), tags are intended for machine use mainly to ease the decoding process. + +Tags are not intended to be used for direct identification of information elements as they are seen from a local application process point of view. How these information elements are locally identified is an implementation matter and depends on the software design and on the language used to manipulate the internal data representation. In this respect, it should be noticed that distinct tags are mainly required in one of the following situations: + +- the information elements are members of a (non-ordered) set (i.e. a set type) and therefore their relative position cannot be used to discriminate between two information elements of the same type (thus with the same tag); +- the information elements are members of an ordered set (i.e. a sequence type) but the presence or absence of optional elements makes it impossible to discriminate between the presence of an optional element and the presence of an immediately following information element of the same type; +- when two occurrences of the same base type appear in a choice type. + +There are four classes of tags. In addition to the Universal class which is used to identify a built-in type, three classes are defined to enable the definition of isomorphic types for decoding purposes: + +- The *APPLICATION-WIDE class* – Tags allocated in this class can be used to identify directly the structure of the data type to be decoded. Tags allocated in this class are significant across an application and shall not be used when there is a risk of clash between values. The APPLICATION-WIDE class should be used only if the application is a "closed" domain or if there is a common registry. + +- The *CONTEXT-SPECIFIC class* – Tags allocated in this class are only significant in a defined domain. Therefore the decoding process identifies the data structure to be decoded both from the tag value and the context in which it appears. There is a common understanding to consider the context to be restricted to the next higher construction. +- The *PRIVATE class* which has very similar property to the APPLICATION-WIDE class but is outside the scope of standardization. + +It should be noticed that the CONTEXT-SPECIFIC class is the only one (when used correctly) which ensures that there will never be any conflict between values, when data types are imported and exported between modules or protocols. + +### 4.6.3 Instances and types + +There is a need to clearly differentiate a data type from an instance of a data type (i.e. the actual information elements carried in a message or a sub-structure). For specification and readability purposes, ASN.1 provides a NamedType notation which enables to qualify a specific instance of a data type using an ASN.1 identifier. + +It should be noticed that there is no need to define one data type per information element. When two information elements are syntactically equivalent it is obviously more convenient to represent them as two instances of the same data type, or if required for decoding, as instances of two types derived from the same data type by CONTEXT-SPECIFIC tagging and whose definitions will thus appear only within the higher construction definition (i.e. the tagged are only defined in the specific context of the higher construction). + +### 4.6.4 Exporting and importing data types + +TC based signalling protocols may have to make use of information elements defined in other signalling protocol specifications. Rather than defining a new information element it should be preferred to import the associated type from the specifications where it has been defined first. Data types can be imported formally or informally depending on the way the exporting protocol is specified. + +- The exporting protocol is specified using an ASN.1 module which exports the required data types: these data types can be formally imported in one of the modules which define the new protocol. +- The exporting protocol is not specified using ASN.1 modules: a convenient solution is to define a data type isomorphic to the "octet string" type and to specify informally its internal structure using a reference to the specification where it is defined (i.e. using a comment statements). + +## 4.7 How to specify abstract syntaxes + +ASE and AC specifications imply that a reference is made to one or several abstract-syntaxes. Each of them represents at an abstract level (i.e. independently of the encoding techniques) sets of data values which may be exchanged during the communication. + +There is currently no need for explicitly assigning a name to the abstract-syntax formed by TC messages for a given application because this abstract-syntax is implicitly identified by the subsystem number which addresses the AE. However the structure of the user information conveyed in the dialogue portion shall be defined as part or one or several other(s) abstract-syntax(es). + +Thus a protocol designer which wants user-information which are not components to be conveyed by TC shall first define one or several abstract syntax(es) which encompasses all the data types whose values may be conveyed. + +It shall also assign a name to each of these abstract-syntaxes. Such a name which is a value of type OBJECT IDENTIFIER will serve as a direct-reference when the actual value will be carried as part of a constructed value of type EXTERNAL, as specified in Recommendation Q.773. + +There is currently no formal way to specify an abstract-syntax; however, when this syntax can be described using ASN.1 the simplest manner is to define a choice type built from all the data types which form the abstract syntax. + +An abstract syntax can then be informally defined by the following sentence to be included in the protocol specifications: + +"The set of data values of type Module-X. Type-A forms an abstract syntax which is identified by the following abstract-syntax-name: ". + +Where in the preceding sentence, Type-A is the name of the choice type and Module-X is the name of the module where it is defined. + +In this context, the abstract-syntax-name also implicitly refers to the encoding rules to be applied to the abstract-syntax. Such encoding rules, which may (but not need) be the one defined by Recommendation X.209, must be agreed *a priori* between the TC-users. + +The ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ASN.1 information object class specified in Recommendation X.681 may also be used for defining abstract syntaxes. The following example illustrates such a use by defining an abstract syntax which encompasses the value of the InitData type which is a collection of three protocol data units used at dialogue establishment to transfer either a list of supported functional units or authentication information: + +**InitModule DEFINITIONS ::=** + +**BEGIN** + +**InitData ::= CHOICE {** + +**functionalUnits [0] IMPLICIT FunctionalUnits,** + +**authenticationInfo [1] IMPLICIT AuthenticationInfo }** + +**FunctionalUnits ::= SEQUENCE OF FunctionalUnit** + +**FunctionalUnit ::= ENUMERATED {unit1(1), unit2(2), unit3(3) }** + +**AuthenticationInfo ::= SEQUENCE {** + +**algorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER,** + +**signature OCTET STRING }** + +**init-abstract-syntax ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ::=** + +**{** + +**InitData IDENTIFIED BY { -- some object identifier value -- }** + +**}** + +**END** + +## **4.8 Encoding rules** + +The concrete syntax of TC messages (i.e. the bit stream exchanged between peer TCs as user data of SCCP messages) is derived by applying the Basic Encoding Rules to the Abstract Syntax Description of TC messages [including TC-user elements except those conveyed as value of an EXTERNAL type (e.g. user information field of a dialogue control APDU)]. The Basic Encoding Rules are described in Recommendation X.209, some minor restrictions are stated in Recommendation Q.773 for the encoding of the TC portion. + +The user information conveyed as value of an EXTERNAL type may also (but not need to) be + +encoded according to the Basic Encoding Rules. In the latter case, the associated abstract-syntax-name serves also as an implicit reference to the applied encoding rules (see 3.3.3). + +It should be noticed that the Basic Encoding Rules allows for several options, especially for the encoding of lengths. This means that an implementation must be able to decode a data unit regardless of the encoding options selected by the sending entity. + +# 5 Mapping of the generic ROS concepts onto TC services + +## 5.1 Overview + +Recommendation X.880 defines a generic model for interactive communication between objects, where the basic interaction involves the invocation of an operation by one object (the invoker) and its performance by another (the performer). This model, known as Remote Operations (ROS), comes with a set of ASN.1 information object classes to be used by protocol designers in the specification of ROS-based applications. + +Recommendation X.800 recognizes that there are multiple possible realizations of this model, as far as communication is concerned. The aim of this clause is to show how and why TC can be considered as one of these realizations, by providing a mapping of the generic concepts onto TC services. + +### 5.1.1 Notation and concept for the generic ROS model + +Recommendation X.880 defines several information object classes that are useful in the specification of ROS-based application protocols. These object classes are defined using the information object specification ASN.1 notation defined in Recommendation X.681. + +The OPERATION class is used to define an operation. It is merely equivalent to the OPERATION MACRO defined in Recommendations X.219 and Q.773. This class may be used by designers of TC-user applications, as an alternative to the MACRO notation described in clause 4. Guidance for migrating from the MACRO notation to this notation is provided in Annex C/X.880. + +The ERROR class is used to define an operation. It is merely equivalent to the ERROR MACRO defined in Recommendations X.219 and Q.773. This class may be used by designers of TC-user applications, as an alternative to the MACRO notation described in clause 4. Guidance for migrating from the MACRO notation to this notation is provided in Annex C/X.880. + +The OPERATION-PACKAGE class is used to define a set of operations which may only be invoked by a ROS-object assuming the role of "consumer", the operations which may only be invoked by a ROS-object assuming the role of "supplier", and the operations which may be invoked by both ROS-objects. When using the communication services of SS No. 7 or OSI, an operation package is realized as an Application Service Element (ASE). + +The CONNECTION-PACKAGE class is used to define the bind and unbind operations used as part of the establishment and release an association. When realized using the communication services of SS No. 7, a connection package is realized as the procedures that use the transaction capabilities structured dialogue handling services. Application-contexts which do not require the explicit invocation of bind and unbind operations can still be considered as including a connection package which uses the emptyBind and emptyUnbind predefined operations. + +The CONTRACT class is used to define an association contract in terms of a connection package and one or more operation packages. When specifying the contract, the packages in which only the association initiator assumes the role of consumer, only the association responder assumes the role of + +consumer, and either may assume the role of consumer are identified. When using the communication services of SS No. 7 or OSI, a contract is realized as an application context. + +The ROS-OBJECT-CLASS class is used to define a set of common capabilities of a set of ROS-objects in terms of the (association) contracts they support as initiators and/or responders. When realized using TC or OSI, a ROS-object maps to a portion of an application process. + +These classes provide a notation which is available for the design of ROS-based applications independently of any particular realization. The actual protocol specification requires the definition of an application context which indicates how the operation contract is realized. Subclause 5.4 defines an APPLICATION-CONTEXT information object class which is available for the specification of TC-based realizations of an operation contract. + +### 5.1.2 Communication model + +The realization of ROS involves the selection of a suitable medium to convey invocations and replies between a pair of ROS-objects. + +The possible media can be classified in two broad categories: + +- whose required when the invoker and the performer are to be implemented in a single physical equipment; +- whose required when the invoker and the performer are to be implemented in separated physical equipments. + +The first category can be further devised in message-passing and procedure calling facilities. + +The medium in the second category depends on the type of network which interconnects the two objects and on some quality of service criteria. + +Recommendation X.880 models the medium as being composed of two stub objects (one for the invoker, one for the performer) and one information transfer object (see Figure 1). The information transfer object capabilities also includes the association control functionalities which might be required to set up an association between the application entities involved in the communication. + +![Figure 1/Q.775 – Generic ROS communication model diagram](7156cf400ef0e19f9d06a5d0549834a3_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the generic ROS communication model. It shows two large ovals labeled 'ROS-object' on the left and right. Between them is a large horizontal oval labeled 'Medium'. Inside the 'Medium' oval, there are two smaller circles labeled 'Stub', one on the left and one on the right. In the center of the 'Medium' oval, between the two 'Stub' circles, is an oval labeled 'Information transfer'. + +Figure 1/Q.775 – Generic ROS communication model diagram + +T1180040-96 + +**Figure 1/Q.775 – Generic ROS communication model** + +The role of each stub object is merely to transform invocations and replies into protocol data units (and vice versa) they exchange using the information transfer object. For a given type of stub objects, there are several possible types of information transfer objects. + +In the context of OSI, the stub objects are realized by the Remote Operation Service Element (ROSE) while several information transfer realizations are available, using suitable combination of ACSE, RTSE and the presentation service. + +The stub objects are realized by the Component Handling Bloc of the TC Component Sublayer (see Recommendation Q.774) together with a collection of operation specific ASEs (the TC-user ASEs). The CHA whose services are defined in 3.1.3/Q.771 drives the generic protocol required to invoke and reports returns of arbitrary operations. + +Each TC-user ASE embodies knowledge of the definitions of the specific operations involved in some operation package. Collectively the CSL and the TC-user ASEs have knowledge of all the operations of the association contract. See Figure 2. + +![Diagram illustrating the TC realization of ROS (Figure 2/Q.775). The diagram shows two symmetric stacks representing communication entities. Each stack consists of an APPLICATION-PROCESS containing a ROS-object, an APPLICATION-ENTITY containing O-ASEs, a Stub, CHA, COMPONENT SUBLAYER, and DHA. These are connected to a common TRANSACTION SUBLAYER, which is part of the Information transfer layer, ultimately connected to the Medium.](7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the protocol stack for the TC realization of ROS. It features two identical communication entities, each represented by a vertical stack of layers. At the top is the APPLICATION-PROCESS, which contains a ROS-object. Below it is the APPLICATION-ENTITY, which contains O-ASEs, a Stub, CHA, COMPONENT SUBLAYER, and DHA. These layers are connected to a common TRANSACTION SUBLAYER. The TRANSACTION SUBLAYER is part of the Information transfer layer, which is connected to the Medium. The diagram is labeled with 'Medium' at the bottom left and 'Information transfer' at the bottom center. The reference 'T1180050-96' is located at the bottom right. + +Diagram illustrating the TC realization of ROS (Figure 2/Q.775). The diagram shows two symmetric stacks representing communication entities. Each stack consists of an APPLICATION-PROCESS containing a ROS-object, an APPLICATION-ENTITY containing O-ASEs, a Stub, CHA, COMPONENT SUBLAYER, and DHA. These are connected to a common TRANSACTION SUBLAYER, which is part of the Information transfer layer, ultimately connected to the Medium. + +T1180050-96 + +Figure 2/Q.775 – TC realization of ROS + +## 5.2 Remote operation service realization + +### 5.2.1 Basic services (stub) + +The TC Component Sublayer provides the necessary services for supporting the invocation of operations and reporting responses. It also provides additional local services for cancelling operation (TC-U-CANCEL request, TC-L-CANCEL indication) or reporting locally-detected protocol error (TC-L-REJECT indication). + +The following restrictions should be noted: + +- The set of allowed InvokedIds is restricted to the integer range (–128 to 127). + +- The &synchronous field of an operation definition is not taken into account. From a TC point of view, operations are always considered as being asynchronous. However, the TC-user might behave in a synchronous manner. +- The priority fields of an operation definition are not taken into account1. + +### 5.2.2 Bind and unbind operations + +TC does not provide any specific mechanism for invoking bind and unbind operations. It is up to the TC-user to construct the bind and unbind ADPUs and transfer them to TC as any other kind of user information. As a consequence, TC is not aware that these operations are being invoked and does not check that they are used consistently with regards to the dialogue service and component handling service (e.g. it cannot verify that no operation is requested after an unbind operation has been invoked). + +#### 5.2.2.1 Bind operation + +When an application-context definition includes a connection package, the initiating TC-user invokes a bind operation to be executed as part of the dialogue establishment procedure, prior to the execution of any other operation. Failure of the execution of this operation leads to the rejection of the dialogue. + +If the TC-user does not really need to invoke an explicit bind operation, it is assumed that it uses the emptyBind predefined operation. + +##### 5.2.2.1.1 Invoking a bind operation + +The TC-user can invoke a bind operation using the TC-BEGIN request primitive. If the definition of the bind operation includes an &ArgumentType field, the TC-user constructs a bind-invoke PDU from this information and transfers it as the first (or only) part of the user-information parameter of the TC-BEGIN request primitive. Otherwise, no bind-invoke PDU is sent. + +NOTE – This should ensure that the bind-request PDU will be included in the first external field of the user-information element of the Dialogue Request APDU (AARQ). + +##### 5.2.2.1.2 Responding to a bind operation + +The TC-user reports the outcome of a bind operation using the first dialogue handling primitive it issues. + +Successful execution of the bind operation is reported using a TC-CONTINUE request primitive or a TC-END request primitive if there is no need to continue the dialogue. In the latter case, it shall also invoke an unbind operation. + +NOTE – Use the TC-END request primitive at this stage places restriction of the use of unbind operations. It implies that only the responder can unbind and that the unbind operation definition does not include an &ResultType field and that the definition of its associated error does not include an &ParameterType field (e.g. as the emptyUnbind operation). + +If the bind operation definition includes an &ResultType field, the TC-user constructs a bind-result PDU from this information and transfers it as the first (or only) part of the user-information parameter of the TC-CONTINUE request primitive or TC-END request primitive. Otherwise no bind-result PDU is sent. + +--- + +1 This might evolve as the studies on priority handling in SS No. 7 will progress. + +The TC-user reports unsuccessful execution of a bind operation using a TC-U-ABORT request primitive issued as an immediate response to the TC-BEGIN indication. The abort reason parameter takes the value "dialogue-refused". + +If the definition of the associated error includes an &ParameterType field, the TC-user constructs a bind-error PDU from this information and transfers it as the first (or only) part of the user-information parameter of the TC-CONTINUE request primitive or TC-END request primitive. Otherwise no bind-error PDU is sent. + +The emptyBind operation and the bind-invoke, bind-result and bind-error PDUs are defined in Recommendation X.880. For convenience their ASN.1 definitions are reproduced below: + +``` +Bind {OPERATION:operation} ::= CHOICE +{ + bind-invoke [16] OPERATION.&ArgumentType (operation), + bind-result [17] OPERATION.&ResultType (operation), + bind-error [18] OPERATION.&Errors.&ParameterType (operation) +} + +emptyBind OPERATION ::= {ERRORS {refuse} SYNCHRONOUS TRUE} +``` + +Where *operation* refers to the bind operation. + +#### 5.2.2.2 Unbind operation + +##### 5.2.2.2.1 Invoking an unbind operation + +If the application-context definition includes a connection package, the TC-user invokes an unbind operation as part of the dialogue termination procedure. + +The mapping onto TC services depends on the type of this unbind operation: + +- a) If the unbind operation definition does not include an &ResultType field and the definition of its associated error does not include an &ParameterType field, the operation can be invoked using the TC-END request primitive. +- b) If the unbind operation definition includes an &ResultType field or the definition of its associated error includes an &ParameterType field, the operation must be invoked using the last TC-CONTINUE request primitive issued by the unbind requestor. + +In both cases, if the unbind operation definition includes an &ArgumentType field, the TC-user constructs an unbind-request APDU which is transferred as the last (or only) part of the user-information parameter of a TC-END request primitive. Otherwise no unbind-request APDU is sent. + +##### 5.2.2.2.2 Responding to an unbind operation + +When accepting an unbind operation, the TC-user issues a TC-END request primitive. If the unbind operation definition includes an &ResultType field, the TC-user constructs an unbind-result APDU which is transferred in the last (or only) part of the user-information parameter of a TC-END request primitive. Otherwise no unbind-result APDU is sent. + +When refusing an unbind operation, the TC-user issues a TC-CONTINUE request primitive. If the definition of the associated error includes an &ParameterType field, the TC-user constructs an unbind-error APDU which is transferred in the last (or only) part of the user-information parameter of a TC-END request primitive. Otherwise no unbind-result APDU is sent. + +NOTE – This should ensure that the unbind-result PDU will be included in the last external field of the user-information element of the Dialogue Response APDU (AARE) when the TC-END request primitive is + +issued as an immediate response to the TC-BEGIN indication primitive, or otherwise in the single EXTERNAL field of the Dialogue Portion. + +If the association contract includes a connection package but the TC-user does not need to explicitly invoke an unbind operation, it is assumed that the emptyUnbind operation is used. This operation is conceptually mapped onto the TC-END request primitive, however no unbind PDU is sent. + +The emptyUnbind operation, the unbind-invoke, unbind-result and unbind-error PDUs are defined in Recommendation X.880. For convenience they are reproduced below: + +``` +Unbind {OPERATION:operation} ::= CHOICE +{ + unbind-invoke [19] OPERATION.&ArgumentType (operation), + unbind-result [20] OPERATION.&ResultType (operation), + unbind-error [21] OPERATION.&Errors.&ParameterType (operation) +} +``` + +``` +emptyUnbind OPERATION ::= {SYNCHRONOUS TRUE} +``` + +Where *operation* refers to the unbind operation. + +## 5.3 Information transfer + +### 5.3.1 Association realizations + +TC provides two association realizations through its dialogue handling function: the structured mode and the unstructured mode which are defined in Recommendation Q.771. + +### 5.3.2 Transfer realization + +As far as Remote Operations are concerned, TC provides the following information transfer capabilities to its user: + +- Bind and unbind PDUs are transferred in a user-information in the Dialogue Portion. +- Basic ROS PDUs (plus the return result not last) are transferred in the component portion of any message. + +TC provides only one type of transfer realization, irrespective of the type of association realization chosen. However, from a sender's point of view, this realization offers some flexibility to the TC-users as far as PDU concatenation is concerned. + +Besides Remote Operations, TC also provides means to transfer any kind of user information through the use of dialogue handling service primitives. + +## 5.4 TC-based application context + +The static aspects of a TC-based application context definition realizing some particular association contract can be described as an information object of class APPLICATION-CONTEXT, which is specified as follows: + +| | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
APPLICATION-CONTEXT ::= {     &associationContract     &dialogueMode     &termination     &componentGrouping     &dialogueAndComponentGrouping     &AdditionalASEs     &AbstractSyntaxes }
|
CLASS CONTRACT, DialogueMode, Termination OPTIONAL, BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL, ABSTRACT-SYNTAX,
| +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +| | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| &applicationContextName
}

WITH SYNTAX
{
CONTRACT
DIALOGUE MODE
[TERMINATION
[COMPONENT GROUPING ALLOWED
[DIALOGUE WITH COMPONENTS ALLOWED
[ADDITIONAL ASEs
ABSTRACT SYNTAXES
APPLICATION CONTEXT NAME
} | OBJECT IDENTIFIER UNIQUE









&associationContract
&dialogueMode
&termination]
&componentGrouping]
&dialogueAndComponentGrouping]
&AdditionalASEs]
&AbstractSyntaxes
&applicationContextName | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +**DialogueMode ::= ENUMERATED {structured (1), unstructured (2)}** + +**Termination ::= ENUMERATED {basic (1), prearranged (2)}** + +The **&associationContract** field identifies the association contract which is realized by this application context. + +The **&dialogueMode** field indicates whether this application context makes use of the dialogue structured mode facilities or the dialogue unstructured mode facilities. If the association contract definition includes a connection package, the **&dialogueMode** field shall indicate "structured". + +The **&termination** field indicates whether basic or prearranged termination is used to end the dialogue. If this field is absent, the application-context definition does not place any constraint on which end method is used. + +The **&componentGrouping** field indicates whether components might be grouped in a single message. If this field is absent, the application-context definition does not place any restrictions on this issue. + +The **&dialogueAndComponentGrouping** field indicates whether bind and unbind PDUs can be sent in messages which also contain components. If this field is absent, the application-context definition does not place any restrictions on this issue. + +The **&AdditionalASEs** field contains the object identifiers of the ASEs required by the application context (if any) which are not based on the use of Remote Operations. + +The **&AbstractSyntaxes** field contains the abstract syntaxes which are required for the conveyance of information between the objects, including the PDUs for invoking and reporting on the operations in the contract. + +The **&applicationContextName** field contains the value which shall be provided to TC to identify the application context. + +## **5.5 Abstract syntaxes** + +### **5.5.1 Dialogue control** + +The **&AbstractSyntaxes** field of an application-context definition must include the following abstract syntax if the **&dialogueMode** field indicates "structured". + +**dialogue-abstract-syntax ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ::= {DialoguePDU IDENTIFIED BY dialogue-as-id}** + +The **&AbstractSyntaxes** field of an application-context definition must include the following abstract syntax if the **&dialogueMode** field indicates "unstructured". + +**uniDialogue-abstract-syntax ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ::= {UniDialoguePDU IDENTIFIED BY uniDialogue-as-id}** + +### 5.5.2 User-defined syntaxes + +#### 5.5.2.1 General + +The &AbstractSyntaxes field of an application-context definition must include one or more abstract syntaxes to represent the TC messages (including the components) and the bind and unbind PDUs. Such abstract syntaxes must be defined by the application designer. + +TC messages are defined in Recommendation Q.773 while bind and unbind PDUs are defined in Recommendation X.880. + +How many abstract syntaxes are defined to support a particular application context is up to the application designer. However, the following rules shall be followed: + +- a) If the application context realizes an association contract which includes a connection package, the values of the data types: + +**Bind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&bind}** +**Unbind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&unbind}** + +shall appear in at least one of these abstract syntaxes. + +- b) For each operation *op* involved in the set of operation packages used by the application context, there shall be at least one of the abstract syntaxes which include the values of the following types: + +**Invoke {TCInvokeIds, OPERATION:op}** +**ReturnResult {OPERATION:op}** + +- c) For each error *err* involved in the set of operation packages used by the application context, there shall be at least one of the abstract syntaxes which include the values of the following types: + +**ReturnError {ERROR:err}** + +- d) At least one of the abstract syntaxes shall include: + +**Reject** + +#### 5.5.2.2 Defining the abstract syntaxes + +Given an operation package, a single abstract syntax which allows the exchange of TC messages carrying invocation and reporting for all of its operations can be defined using the following data type: + +**TCSingleAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {AllOperations {package}}, {AllOperations {package}} }** + +Or alternatively a pair of abstract syntaxes can be defined based upon the pair of types: + +**TCConsumerAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {ConsumerPerforms {package}}, {ConsumerPerforms {package}} }** + +**TCSupplierAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {SupplierPerforms {package}}, {SupplierPerforms {package}} }** + +A single abstract syntax may accommodate a set of packages, provided that the operation and error codes are unique. For example, the following data type can be used as the basis of a single abstract syntax to accommodate all the operation packages involved in an association contract: + +``` + +AllPackagesAS {APPLICATION-CONTEXT:ac} ::= + TCSingleAS + { + combine + { + { + ac.&associationContract.&OperationsOf + | ac.&associationContract.&InitiatorConsumerOf + | ac.&associationContract.&InitiatorSupplierOf + } + {}, + {} + } + } + +``` + +An independent abstract syntax can be defined to represent values of bind and unbind PDUs based on the following type: + +``` + +ConnectionAS {APPLICATION-CONTEXT:ac} ::= CHOICE +{ + bind Bind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&bind}, + unbind Unbind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&unbind} +} + +``` + +The object identifier value allocated to this abstract syntax should be included in the &abstract-syntax-name multivalued field of the application-context definition. It is intended to serve as direct reference when values of these PDUs are conveyed in the user-information parameter of Dialogue Control PDUs or directly as value of the Dialogue Portion. + +Additional abstract syntaxes may also be defined to represent values of the PDUs associated with non ROS-based ASEs (see the example in 4.7). + +## 5.6 Notation extension + +The following ASN.1 module contains definitions which enable the designer of a TC-user protocol to specify application contexts and abstract syntaxes as instances of appropriate information object classes. + +``` + +TC-Notation-Extensions {ccitt recommendation q 775 modules(2) notation-extension(4) version1(1)} + +``` + +``` + +DEFINITIONS ::= + +``` + +``` + +BEGIN + +``` + +``` + +IMPORTS + +``` + +``` + +TCMessage{} FROM TCAPMessages {ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) messages(1) version3(3)} + +``` + +``` + +Bind{}, Unbind{} FROM Remote-Operations-Generic-ROS-PDUs {joint-iso-ccitt remote-operations(4) generic-ROS-PDUs(6) version1(0)} + +``` + +``` + +AllOperations{}, ConsumerPerforms{}, SupplierPerforms{}, combine{} FROM Remote-Operations-Useful-Definitions {joint-iso-ccitt remote-operations(4) useful-definitions(7) version1(0)} + +``` + +``` + +CONTRACT, OPERATION-PACKAGE FROM Remote-Operations-Information-Objects {joint-iso-ccitt remote-operations(4) informationObjects(5) version1(0)} + +``` + +``` + +UniDialoguePDU, uniDialogue-as-id FROM UnidialoguePDUs +{ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) unidialoguePDUs(3) version1(1)} + +``` + +DialoguePDU, dialogue-as-id FROM DialoguePDUs + {ccitt recommendation q 773 modules(2) dialoguePDUs(2) version1(1)} + +APPLICATION-CONTEXT ::= CLASS + { + &associationContract CONTRACT, + &dialogueMode DialogueMode, + &termination Termination OPTIONAL, + &componentGrouping BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, + &dialogueAndComponentGrouping BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE, + &AdditionalASEs OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL, + &AbstractSyntaxes ABSTRACT-SYNTAX, + &applicationContextName OBJECT IDENTIFIER UNIQUE + } + +WITH SYNTAX + { + CONTRACT &associationContract + DIALOGUE MODE &dialogueMode + [TERMINATION &termination] + [COMPONENT GROUPING ALLOWED &componentGrouping] + [DIALOGUE WITH COMPONENTS ALLOWED &dialogueAndComponentGrouping] + [ADDITIONAL ASEs &AdditionalASEs] + ABSTRACT SYNTAXES &AbstractSyntaxes + APPLICATION CONTEXT NAME &applicationContextName + } + +DialogueMode ::= ENUMERATED {structured (1), unstructured (2)} + +Termination ::= ENUMERATED {basic (1), prearranged (2)} + +dialogue-abstract-syntax ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ::= {DialoguePDU IDENTIFIED BY dialogue-as-id} + +uniDialogue-abstract-syntax ABSTRACT-SYNTAX ::= {UniDialoguePDU IDENTIFIED BY uniDialogue-as-id} + +TCSingleAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {AllOperations {package}}, {AllOperations {package}} } + +TCConsumerAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {ConsumerPerforms {package}}, {ConsumerPerforms {package}} } + +TCSupplierAS {OPERATION-PACKAGE: package} ::= TCMessage { {SupplierPerforms {package}}, {SupplierPerforms {package}} } + +AllPackagesAS {APPLICATION-CONTEXT:ac} ::= + TCSingleAS + { + combine + { + { + ac.&associationContract.&OperationsOf + | ac.&associationContract.&InitiatorConsumerOf + | ac.&associationContract.&InitiatorSupplierOf + }, + {}, + {} + } + } + } + +``` +ConnectionAS {APPLICATION-CONTEXT:ac} ::= CHOICE +{ + bind Bind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&bind}, + unbind Unbind{ac.&associationContract.&connection.&unbind} +} +END +``` + + + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +- Series A Organization of the work of the ITU-T +- Series B Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification +- Series C General telecommunication statistics +- Series D General tariff principles +- Series E Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors +- Series F Non-telephone telecommunication services +- Series G Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks +- Series H Audiovisual and multimedia systems +- Series I Integrated services digital network +- Series J Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals +- Series K Protection against interference +- Series L Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant +- Series M TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits +- Series N Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits +- Series O Specifications of measuring equipment +- Series P Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks +- Series Q Switching and signalling** +- Series R Telegraph transmission +- Series S Telegraph services terminal equipment +- Series T Terminals for telematic services +- Series U Telegraph switching +- Series V Data communication over the telephone network +- Series X Data networks and open system communication +- Series Z Programming languages \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/1006fec55ed05ea680f955e714fab99e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/1006fec55ed05ea680f955e714fab99e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8d34d6b36b594aa58e8c6666c035a94a158fa91 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/1006fec55ed05ea680f955e714fab99e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b25e437847737b42bbd50b80f150702df46d007fadd9b68d133e3df8e653c7c9 +size 1615 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4951cfb04f8525545c58638c52b81631cc6f2a3c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a0ece35449d81ce1c4fcd8691e901beccaf0dd02b088bbffafa9ad38626e95bd +size 8207 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/43fec6623ab9cb223a9ff74e2d2a4402_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/43fec6623ab9cb223a9ff74e2d2a4402_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4013ebeebed3d44370659d701528c0b790acef9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/43fec6623ab9cb223a9ff74e2d2a4402_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7625f933571780afaaab61570aad772e016c28177e3672bbe06fe0d030d1c024 +size 10520 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48a7d022dbd05ef96942257f5a74c4713fd7deac --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:651ad0c0145ee06e0d94777d36fc247ad553aad2b3cd653c39d0695cff0f394c +size 17925 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/f261b3efe1aa5bef0210d6ec7a4c6eb5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/f261b3efe1aa5bef0210d6ec7a4c6eb5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28c0e97039b1ec8d5d113713d79b402065c4dc46 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/f261b3efe1aa5bef0210d6ec7a4c6eb5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2ed6f3a8ab78c50d311ae23ed80dd2d1f7ed156835e5f8a0746399c3b808eb8b +size 1415 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e36307a5c22409d268c8506b20a03a447cb357aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.786-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1170 @@ + + +![ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +**Q.786** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +(03/93) + +**SPECIFICATIONS +OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7** + +--- + +**SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7** + +**SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.786** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.786 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms "CCITT, CCIR or IFRB" or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +*Page* + +| | | | +|-----|-------------------------------------------|---| +| 1 | Introduction ..... | 1 | +| 2 | Objective of the test specification ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Scope of the test ..... | 1 | +| 4 | General principles of tests ..... | 2 | +| 5 | Test environment..... | 2 | +| 5.1 | SCCP relation ..... | 2 | +| 5.2 | Configuration..... | 2 | +| 6 | Test traffic ..... | 3 | +| 7 | SCCP test list..... | 3 | + + + +# SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 + +# SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION + +(Helsinki, 1993) + +# 1 Introduction + +This Recommendation contains a detailed set of tests for the Signalling System No. 7 Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP). These tests are intended to validate the protocol specified in Recommendations Q.711-Q.714. This Recommendation conforms to Recommendation Q.780, which describes the basic rules of the test specification. + +# 2 Objective of the test specification + +The objective of the test specification is to provide: + +*Validation* – A level of confidence that a given implementation conforms to the Recommendations Q.711-Q.714 for SS No. 7 SCCP. + +*Compatibility* – A level of confidence that two implementations of SS No. 7 SCCP are able to interwork. + +In order to ensure that this test specification meets this objective, the following criteria are used: + +- 1) The test specification is not intended to provide exhaustive testing of all aspects of the SS No. 7 SCCP. +- 2) All tests should be of a practical nature and implementable using the available technology. +- 3) The test should concentrate on the testing of a normal signalling procedure. Testing of an abnormal signalling procedure will only be identified where this is regarded as particularly useful. +- 4) The test list does not include any tests which are application specific (e.g. IN, mobile application, etc.). If such tests are required, they should be contained in application specific testing documentation. + +# 3 Scope of the test + +The test list is composed to validate routing/addressing and data transfer concerning connectionless SCCP procedures by monitoring and analysing SCCP messages and their contents. SCCP management, segmentation in connectionless SCCP test and connection-oriented procedures are for further study. + +Some tests in this Recommendation require generation of primitives, therefore when performing these tests, appropriate normal system action of the user will have to be chosen which results indicating primitives being generated. + +The testing of primitives is outside the scope of this Recommendation. Both messages and primitives are shown in expected message sequence diagram as indicated below, but primitives are shown for ease of understanding only. + +PRIMITIVE + +![A double-lined arrow pointing to the right, representing a primitive in a message sequence diagram.](1006fec55ed05ea680f955e714fab99e_img.jpg) + +A double-lined arrow pointing to the right, representing a primitive in a message sequence diagram. + +MESSAGE + +![A dotted arrow pointing to the right, representing a message in a message sequence diagram.](f261b3efe1aa5bef0210d6ec7a4c6eb5_img.jpg) + +A dotted arrow pointing to the right, representing a message in a message sequence diagram. + +An internal routing of SCCP user data is implementation dependent, and therefore all tests related to internal routing may not be possible to execute. In addition, access to various test interfaces may not be available in all implementations. + +# 4 General principles of tests + +The tests are described as “Validation(VAT)” tests or “Validation” and “Compatibility(CPT)” tests. Each test description indicates in the field “type of test” whether the test is a “Validation” test or a “Validation” and “Compatibility” test. + +All questions and checks in the test description should be answered with positive acknowledgement for correct operations. + +Where particular failure conditions are tested with or without the return option set, the test with the return option not set should use the same pre-test conditions and data, with the exception of the return option parameter as the corresponding test with the return option set. + +Some of the described validation tests may not be required to be executed, since the functionality they aim to test is not included in the Implementation Under Test (IUT). In such a case the non-execution of such a test should not be regarded as a non-conformance statement. + +For the test cases which result in returning N-NOTICE indication primitive or UDT message, N-UNIDATA request primitive or UDT message should include the sufficient information to return the N-NOTICE indication primitive or UDT message. + +# 5 Test environment + +## 5.1 SCCP relation + +A signalling relation is required between “SP A” and “SP B” or among “SP A”, “SP B” and “SP C” in order to carry out effective tests. Tested MTPs should be used for compatibility tests. + +## 5.2 Configuration + +Two configurations are required to perform these tests as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. + +![Diagram of SCCP relation between SP A and SP B](43fec6623ab9cb223a9ff74e2d2a4402_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two rectangular boxes representing Service Points (SP). The left box is labeled 'SP' and 'A' inside, with '(Under test)' written below it. The right box is labeled 'SP' and 'B' inside, with 'T1155400-93/d01' written below it. A horizontal arrow points from the right side of the left box to the left side of the right box. Another horizontal arrow points from the left side of the right box to the right side of the left box. The word '(Note)' is written between the two arrows. + +Diagram of SCCP relation between SP A and SP B + +NOTE – The arrows indicate an SCCP relation. + +FIGURE 1/Q.786 +**Test configuration for SCCP – Configuration 1** + +![Diagram of SCCP relation between SP C, SP A, and SP B](9c9a8f4d24e41870c2a264e5ae278fca_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows three rectangular boxes representing Service Points (SP). The left box is labeled 'SP' and 'C' inside, with '(Note 1)' written below it. The middle box is labeled 'SP' and 'A' inside, with '(Under test)' and '(Note 2)' written below it. The right box is labeled 'SP' and 'B' inside, with 'T1155410-93/d02' and '(Note 1)' written below it. A horizontal arrow points from the right side of the left box to the left side of the middle box. Another horizontal arrow points from the left side of the middle box to the right side of the left box. A third horizontal arrow points from the right side of the middle box to the left side of the right box. A fourth horizontal arrow points from the left side of the right box to the right side of the middle box. + +Diagram of SCCP relation between SP C, SP A, and SP B + +# NOTES + +- 1 The arrows indicate an SCCP relation. +- 2 SP A is used as relay point. + +FIGURE 2/Q.786 +**Test configuration for SCCP – Configuration 2** + +The configurations shown above are functional representations only, e.g. in Configuration 2, SP B and SP C could be the same or could belong to different MTP networks. + +# 6 Test traffic + +The details for test traffic and its format are for further study. + +# 7 SCCP test list + +\* VAT & CPT + +# 1 Connectionless procedure + +## 1.1 SCCP Routing + +### 1.1.1 Messages from SCCP users + +#### 1.1.1.1 Route not on GT + +##### 1.1.1.1.1 Local DPC and SSN included, DPC and SSN available + +###### 1.1.1.1.1.1 GT and SSN included + +###### 1.1.1.1.1.2 GT not included, SSN included + +##### 1.1.1.1.2 Local DPC and SSN included, SSN unavailable – Return option set + +##### 1.1.1.1.3 Local DPC and SSN included, SSN unavailable – Return option not set + +##### \* 1.1.1.1.4 Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and SSN available + +##### 1.1.1.1.5 Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option set + +##### 1.1.1.1.6 Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set + +#### 1.1.1.2 Route on GT + +##### 1.1.1.2.1 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN available + +###### 1.1.1.2.1.1 SSN and GT included + +###### 1.1.1.2.1.2 SSN not included , GT included + +##### 1.1.1.2.2 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option set + +##### 1.1.1.2.3 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option not set + +##### 1.1.1.2.4 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and SSN available + +###### 1.1.1.2.4.1 SSN and GT included + +###### \* 1.1.1.2.4.2 SSN not included , GT included + +##### 1.1.1.2.5 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option set + +##### 1.1.1.2.6 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set + +##### \* 1.1.1.2.7 GT translated to DPC and new or as same GT, and DPC available + +##### 1.1.1.2.8 GT translation failed – Return option set + +##### 1.1.1.2.9 GT translation failed – Return option not set + +### 1.1.2 Messages from MTP + +#### 1.1.2.1 Route on GT + +##### \* 1.1.2.1.1 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN available + +##### \* 1.1.2.1.2 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option set + +##### \* 1.1.2.1.3 GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option not set + +##### \* 1.1.2.1.4 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and SSN available + +##### \* 1.1.2.1.5 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option set + +- \* 1.1.2.1.6 GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set +- \* 1.1.2.1.7 GT translated to DPC and new or as same GT, and DPC available +- \* 1.1.2.1.8 GT translation failed – Return option set +- \* 1.1.2.1.9 GT translation failed – Return option not set +- 1.1.2.2 Route not on GT + - 1.1.2.2.1 Local DPC and SSN, and SSN available + - 1.1.2.2.1.1 GT and SSN included + - \* 1.1.2.2.1.2 GT not included, SSN included + - \* 1.1.2.2.2 Local DPC and SSN unavailable – Return option set + - \* 1.1.2.2.3 Local DPC and SSN unavailable – Return option not set +- 1.2 Data transfer + - 1.2.1 Data transfer with sequential delivery capability + - \* 1.2.1.1 At originating node + - \* 1.2.1.2 At relay node + - 1.2.2 Data transfer with syntax error + - 1.2.3 Message Return + - 1.2.3.1 UDTS deliverable + - 1.2.3.1.1 UDTS deliverable to SCCP user + - 1.2.3.1.2 UDTS deliverable to other SP + - 1.2.3.2 UDTS undeliverable + - 1.2.3.2.1 UDTS undeliverable to SCCP user + - 1.2.4 Segmentation + - Further Study +- 2 SCCP management** + - Further Study +- 3 Connection-oriented procedure** + - Further Study + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|---------------------------------------------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.1.1 | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.3) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN included, DPC and SSN available GT and SSN included. | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the user data can be delivered to the correct SCCP user at SP A when routing not on GT. | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– DPC of SP A
– SSN
– GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SSN at SP A available | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B

N-UNITDATA req.
>

N-UNITDATA ind.

| | | SP A | SP B |
N-UNITDATA req.
>

N-UNITDATA ind.

| | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | +|
N-UNITDATA req.
>

N-UNITDATA ind.

| | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to an SCCP user at SP A with a DPC and SSN of SP A in the request. | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------------------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.1.2 | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.3) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN included, DPC and SSN available GT not included, SSN included. | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the user data can be delivered to the correct SCCP user at SP A when routing not on GT. | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– DPC of SP A
– SSN
– no GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SSN at SP A available | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
  >
N-UNITDATA ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-UNITDATA ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-UNITDATA ind.
< | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to a SCCP user at SP A with a DPC and SSN of SP A in the request. | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------|--|--------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.2 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2 3) b)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN included, SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when routing not on GT and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– DPC of SP A
– SSN
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-NOTICE ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | N-NOTICE ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | | | +| N-NOTICE ind.
< | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to an SCCP user at SP A with a DPC and SSN of SP A in the request. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|--------------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.3 | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.3) b)/Q.714 | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN included, SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is not returned when routing not on GT and return option is not set. | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  1. 1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
    • – DPC of SP A
    • – SSN
  2. 2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request not to be set
  3. 3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
    • – SSN at SP A unavailable
| | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B

N-UNITDATA req.
>
| | | SP A | SP B |
N-UNITDATA req.
> | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | +|
N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to an SCCP user at SP A with a DPC and SSN of SP A in the request. | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT RETURNED TO SCCP USER. | | | | | | + +**SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2 3) a)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and SSN available. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that a UDT message can be generated correctly to SP B when routing not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  1. 1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
    • – DPC of SP B
    • – SSN
    • – no GT
  2. 2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
    • – DPC at SP B available
    • – SSN at SP B available
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
             SP A                                     SP B              N-UNITDATA req.              >              UDT  >           
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|
TEST DESCRIPTION
1. Arrange SP A to request generating a UDT message to SP B with a remote DPC and SSN.
2. Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.
3. CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A TO SP B?
4. CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT?
5. CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW?
6. CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE?
| | | TEST DESCRIPTION | | 1. | Arrange SP A to request generating a UDT message to SP B with a remote DPC and SSN. | 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A TO SP B? | 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request generating a UDT message to SP B with a remote DPC and SSN. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A TO SP B? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +**Recommendation Q.786 (03/93)** 9 + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.4 (continued) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP B) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | 1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | 0000 (No global title is included) | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | 1 (Routing on DPC) | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP B (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | SSN at SP B | +| NOTE – Inclusion of DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------|--|--------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.5 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.3) b)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when routing not on GT and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– DPC of SP B
– SSN
– no GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– DPC of SP B unavailable and/or
– SSN at SP B unavailable | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-NOTICE ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | N-NOTICE ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | | | +| N-NOTICE ind.
< | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to SP B with a remote DPC and SSN. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.1.6 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.3) b)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route not on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: Remote DPC and SSN included, DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is not returned when routing not on GT and return option is not set. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– DPC of SP B
– SSN
– no GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request not to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– DPC of SP B unavailable and/or
– SSN at SP B unavailable | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
=====>
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to SP B with a remote DPC and SSN. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A. | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT RETURNED TO SCCP USER. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------|--|----------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.1.1 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) i)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN available SSN and GT included. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to a local DPC and SSN and the user data can be delivered to the SCCP user at SP A. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
– no SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– new or same SSN
– SSN at SP A available | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-UNITDATA ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | N-UNITDATA ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA ind.
< | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to a SCCP user at SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.1.2 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) i)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN available SSN not included, GT included. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to a local DPC and SSN and the user data can be delivered to the SCCP user at SP A. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
– no SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– SSN
– SSN at SP A available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A

N-UNITDATA req.
  >

N-UNITDATA ind.
<
SP B
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to a SCCP user at SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------|--|--------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.2 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) i)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when routing on GT translates at SP A to a local DPC and an unavailable SSN and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  • 1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
    • – GT
  • 2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request to be set
  • 2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
    • – GT translated to
      • – DPC of SP A
      • – SSN
    • – SSN at SP A unavailable
| | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-NOTICE ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | N-NOTICE ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | | | +| N-NOTICE ind.
< | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to a SCCP user at SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|---------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.3 | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) i)/Q.714 | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when routing on GT translates at SP A to a local DPC and an unavailable SSN and return option is not set. | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request not to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– SSN
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
| | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
| | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to a SCCP user at SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT RETURNED TO SCCP USER. | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.4.1 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) ii)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and SSN available SSN and GT included. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to remote DPC and SSN, and a SCCP UDT message can be generated correctly to SP B. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
– SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP B
– new or same SSN
– routing on DPC-SSN
– DPC of SP B available
– SSN at SP B available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
=====>
UDT ----->
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request generating of a UDT message to SP B with a GT to be translated at SP A to a remote DPC and SSN. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.4.1 (continued) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP B) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | 1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | Don't care | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | 1 (Routing on DPC) | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP B (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | SSN at SP B (result of GT translation) | +| 8) Global Title (Note): | "Appropriate information" | +| NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.4.2 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) ii)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Messages from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and SSN available SSN not included, GT included. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to remote DPC and SSN, and a UDT message can be generated correctly to SP B. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
– SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP B
– SSN
– routing on DPC-SSN
– DPC of SP B available
– SSN at SP B available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
=====>
UDT ----->
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request generating of a UDT message to SP B with a GT to be translated at SP A to a remote DPC and SSN. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.4.2 (continued) + +## CHECK TABLE (1/1) + +### UDT (SP A → SP B) + +- | | | | +|----|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1) | Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +|----|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### Called Party Address + +- | | | | +|----|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2) | Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) | SSN Indicator: | 1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) | Global Title Indicator: | Don't care | +| 5) | Routing Indicator: | 1 (Routing on DPC) | +| 6) | Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP B (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) | Sub-system Number: | SSN at SP B | +| 8) | Global Title (Note): | "Appropriate information" | + +NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|----------------------|--|--------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.5 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) iii)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when routing on GT translates at SP A to an unavailable remote DPC and/or SSN and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP B
– SSN
– routing on DPC-SSN
– DPC of SP B unavailable and/or
– SSN at SP B unavailable | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
N-NOTICE ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | N-NOTICE ind.
< | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | | | | | | | | +| N-NOTICE ind.
< | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to SP B with a GT to be translated at SP A to a remote DPC and SSN. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|--|--|-----------------|--|---|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.6 | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) a) iii)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is not returned when routing on GT translates at SP A to an unavailable remote DPC and/or SSN and return option is not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request not to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP B
– SSN
– routing on DPC-SSN
– DPC of SP B unavailable and/or
– SSN at SP B unavailable | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
 
N-UNITDATA req.
>
| | | SP A | SP B | | | N-UNITDATA req. | | > | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req. | | | | | | | | | | | +| > | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data to SP B with a GT to be translated at SP A to a remote DPC and SSN. | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT RETURNED TO SCCP USER. | | | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.7 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) b) i)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to DPC and new or same GT, and DPC available. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to remote DPC and new or same GT, and a UDT message can be generated correctly to SP B. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– new or same GT
– DPC of SP B
– routing on GT
– DPC of SP B available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
=====>
UDT - - - - ->
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request generating of a UDT message to SP B with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and new or same GT. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.7 (continued) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP B) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | 0 (SSN is not included)
or
1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | 0001, 0010, 0011 or 0100 (Global Title included) | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | 0 (Routing on GT) | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP B (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | XXXXXXXX (if SSN Indicator equals to 1) | +| 8) Global Title: | a Global Title Data (resulting from GT translation) | +| NOTE – Inclusion of DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|-------------------------|--|-------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.8 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translation failed – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when GT translation failed and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– a GT
– DPC of SP B
– routing on GT
– DPC of SP B unavailable | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B

N-UNITDATA req.
N-NOTICE ind.
| | | SP A | SP B |
N-UNITDATA req.
| | N-NOTICE ind.
| | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | +|
N-UNITDATA req.
| | | | | | | | | +| N-NOTICE ind.
| | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1.

2.

3.

4. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data with a GT.

Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.

CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B.

CHECK B: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|-------------------------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2.9 | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.2.4) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from SCCP users, route on GT. | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translation failed – Return option not set. | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is not returned when GT translation failed and return option is not set. | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the called address in N-UNITDATA request to contain:
– GT
2. Arrange return option in N-UNITDATA request not to be set
3. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– GT translated to
– a GT
– DPC of SP B
– routing on GT
– DPC of SP B unavailable | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B

N-UNITDATA req.
| | | SP A | SP B |
N-UNITDATA req.
| | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | +|
N-UNITDATA req.
| | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to request delivery of user data with a GT. | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT RETURNED TO SCCP USER. | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.1 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1.3) a) i)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Messages from MTP, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN available. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to a local DPC and SSN and the user data can be delivered to the SCCP user at SP A. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– new or same SSN
– SSN at SP A available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDT
N-UNITDATA ind.
<=====
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------|---------------------|----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------|-----------------------------------|----|-------|---------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1.3) a) i)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Messages from MTP, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the data is returned when routing on GT translates to a local DPC and an unavailable SSN, and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
– Return option set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– new or same SSN
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDT
UDTS ----->
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC and SSN of SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDTS MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDTS MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CHECK TABLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| UDTS (SP A → SP B)
1) Return cause: “Appropriate value”
2) Called party address: Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message
3) Calling party address: “Appropriate information of SP A”
4) Data: Same data as in the UDT message
| | | 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | +| 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.3 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1.3) a) i)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the data is not returned when routing on GT translates to a local DPC and an unavailable SSN and return option is not set. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
– Return option not set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP A
– new or same SSN
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDT
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to a DPC of SP A and SSN. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.4 | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) a) ii)/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and SSN available. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to a remote DPC and SSN, and a UDT message can be generated correctly to SP C. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translated to
– DPC of SP C
– new or same SSN
– route on DPC-SSN
– DPC of SP C available
– SSN at SP C available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 2 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP B SP A SP C
UDT ----->
UDT ----->
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and SSN. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE GENERATED BY SP A AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.4 (continued) + +## CHECK TABLE (1/1) + +### UDT (SP A → SP C) + +- | | | | +|----|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1) | Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +|----|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| + +### Called Party Address + +- | | | | +|----|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 2) | Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) | SSN Indicator: | 1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) | Global Title Indicator: | Don’t care | +| 5) | Routing Indicator: | 1 (Routing on DPC) | +| 6) | Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP C (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) | Sub-system Number: | SSN at SP C | +| 8) | Global Title (Note): | ‘‘Appropriate information’’ | + +NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. + + + +**SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.6 | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) a) iv)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and SSN, and DPC and/or SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the data is not returned when routing on GT translates to an unavailable remote DPC and/or SSN and return option is not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  1. 1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
    • – SCCP address information:
      • – GT
      • – route on GT
    • – return option not set
  2. 2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
    • – GT translated to
      • – DPC of SP C
      • – new or same SSN
      • – route on DPC-SSN
    • – DPC of SP C unavailable and/or SSN at SP C unavailable
| | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 2 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP B SP A SP C
UDT >
| | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION
1. Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and SSN.
2. Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.
3. CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B.
4. CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE?
| | | 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and SSN. | 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and SSN. | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | + +**Recommendation Q.786 (03/93)** 33 + +**SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) b) i)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translated to remote DPC and new or same GT, and DPC available. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the translation based on GT can be performed correctly to remote DPC and new or same GT, and a UDT message can be generated correctly to SP C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
    • SCCP address information:
      • GT
      • route on GT
  2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
    • GT translated to
      • DPC of SP C
      • new or same GT
      • route on GT
    • DPC of SP C available
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 2 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP B
SP A
SP C
UDT
>
UDT
>
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|
TEST DESCRIPTION
1. Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and new or same GT.
2. Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.
3. CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A?
4. CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE GENERATED BY SP A AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT?
5. CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW?
6. CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE?
| | | TEST DESCRIPTION | | 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and new or same GT. | 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE GENERATED BY SP A AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and new or same GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGE GENERATED BY SP A AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +34 **Recommendation Q.786 (03/93)** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.7 (continued) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP C) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000000 (Class 0, Return option is not set)
or
10000000 (Class 0, Return option is set)
or
00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | 0 (SSN is not included)
or
1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | 0001, 0010, 0011 or 0100 (Global Title is included) | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | 0 (Routing on GT) | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP C (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | XXXXXXXX (if SSN Indicator equals to 1) | +| 8) Global Title: | a Global Title data (resulting from GT translation)) | +| NOTE – Inclusion of DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------|---------------------|----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------|-----------------------------------|----|-------|---------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translation failed – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is returned when GT translation failed and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
– return option set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translation not existing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
< UDT
UDTS >
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT.
2. Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.
3. CHECK A: WAS THE UDTS MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A?
4. CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDTS MESSAGE?
5. CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW?
6. CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CHECK TABLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| UDTS (SP A → SP B)
1) Return cause: “Appropriate value”
2) Called party address: Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message
3) Calling party address: “Appropriate information of SP A”
4) Data: Same data as in the UDT message
| | | 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | +| 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION + +| | | | | | | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.9 | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) c)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: GT translation failed – Return option not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that data is not returned when GT translation failed and return option is not set. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
  1. 1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
    • – SCCP address information:
    •   – GT
    •   – route on GT
    • – return option not set
  2. 2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
    • – GT translation not existing
| | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
< UDT
| | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION
1. Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT.
2. Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.
3. CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B.
4. CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE?
| | | 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT. | 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a GT. | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | + +**Recommendation Q.786 (03/93)**       37 + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|--|-------|-----------------|--|---|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.1 | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 2) a)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN, and SSN available GT and SSN included. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the user data can be delivered to the correct SCCP user at SP A when routing not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– SSN
– GT
– route on DPC-SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– SSN at SP A available | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
< UDT
N-UNITDATA ind.
<
| | | SP A | SP B | | < UDT | N-UNITDATA ind. | | < | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | | | +| | < UDT | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA ind. | | | | | | | | | | | +| < | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a SSN. | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|--|------------|-----------------|--|--------|--| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 2) a)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN, and SSN available GT not included, SSN included. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the user data can be delivered to the correct SCCP user at SP A when routing not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
- SCCP address information:
- SSN
- no GT
- route on DPC-SSN
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
- SSN at SP A available | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDT
N-UNITDATA ind.
<=====
| | | SP A | SP B | | <----- UDT | N-UNITDATA ind. | | <===== | | +| SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | | | +| | <----- UDT | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA ind. | | | | | | | | | | | +| <===== | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a SSN. | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE DATA CORRECTLY DELIVERED TO THE SCCP USER AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|---------------|---------------------|----|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------|-----------------------------------|----|-------|---------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 3) b)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the data is returned when routing is not based on GT and return option is set. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– SSN
– route on DPC-SSN
– return option set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
< UDT
UDTS >
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with an SSN. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE UDTS MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDTS MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CHECK TABLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| UDTS (SP A → SP B)
1)Return cause:“Appropriate value”
2)Called party address:Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message
3)Calling party address:“Appropriate information of SP A”
4)Data:Same data as in the UDT message
| | | 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | +| 1) | Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2) | Called party address: | Derived from the calling party address in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3) | Calling party address: | “Appropriate information of SP A” | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4) | Data: | Same data as in the UDT message | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|--|------|--|---|-----| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.3 | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 2.3.1 2) b)/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Message from MTP, route not on GT. | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Local DPC and SSN, and SSN unavailable – Return option not set. | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that the data is not returned when routing is not based on GT and return option is not set. | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– SSN
– route on DPC-SSN
– return option not set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– SSN at SP A unavailable | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP A SP B
< UDT
| | | SP A | | SP B | | < | UDT | +| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | +| | < | UDT | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send a UDT message to SP A with a SSN. | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|--|------|----------------------|--|---|----------------------|--|---|----------------------|--------------------|---|----------------------|--|---|----------------------|--|---| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 4/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Data Transfer with Sequential Delivery Capability at originating node. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that SP A uses the same signalling link for all messages using class 1 protocol. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a number of N-UNITDATA request with:
– address information identifying SP B:
– sequence control set
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SP B available
– SSN at SP B available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
N-UNITDATA req.
>
>
N-UNITDATA req.
>
>
N-UNITDATA req.
>
UDT
(Class = 1)
>
N-UNITDATA req.
>
>
N-UNITDATA req.
>
>
| | | SP A | | SP B | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | N-UNITDATA req.
> | UDT
(Class = 1) | > | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | +| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | UDT
(Class = 1) | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| N-UNITDATA req.
> | | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A to send five UDT messages using class 1 protocol. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WERE THE UDT MESSAGES CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP B CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGES AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WERE ALL THE UDT MESSAGES SENT WITH THE SAME SLS CODE CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL SENT IN THE CORRECT ORDER? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.1 ( continued ) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP B) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | Don't care | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | Don't care | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | Don't care | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP C (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | Don't care | +| 8) Global Title (Note): | "Appropriate information" | +| NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|------|------|------|--|---|---|--|---|---|--------------------|---|--------------------|---|--|--|---|---|--|---|---| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 4/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: Data Transfer with Sequential Delivery Capability at relay node. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that SP A uses the same signalling link for all messages using class 1 protocol. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a number of SCCP messages with:
– address information (GT) identifying SP C:
– sequence control set
– GT translation necessary in SP A
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SP C available
– SSN at SP C available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT & CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP B SP A SP C
UDT
(Class = 1)
UDT
(Class = 1)
| | | SP B | SP A | SP C | | → | → | | → | → | UDT
(Class = 1) | → | UDT
(Class = 1) | → | | | → | → | | → | → | +| SP B | SP A | SP C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | → | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | → | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| UDT
(Class = 1) | → | UDT
(Class = 1) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | → | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | → | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP B to send five UDT messages using class 1 protocol, using SP A as relay point. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3. | CHECK A: WERE THE UDT MESSAGES CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDT MESSAGES AND WAS THE SIO CORRECT? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6. | CHECK D: WERE ALL THE UDT MESSAGES SENT WITH THE SAME SLS CODE CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL AND WAS THE ORDER IN WHICH THE MESSAGES WERE SENT THE SAME ORDER IN WHICH THEY WERE RECEIVED? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.2 ( continued ) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDT (SP A → SP C) | | +| 1) Protocol class: | 00000001 (Class 1, Return option is not set)
or
10000001 (Class 1, Return option is set) | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | Don't care | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | Don't care | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | Don't care | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP C (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | Don't care | +| 8) Global Title (Note): | "Appropriate information" | +| NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2 | | | +| REFERENCE: 4.3/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | +| SUBTITLE: Data Transfer with Syntax Error. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that a UDT message received with syntax error at SP A is discarded. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDT message from SP B to SP A with:
– Syntax error
– return option set | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDT
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1.
2.
3.
4.
5. | Arrange SP B to generate a UDT message with a syntax error.

Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.

CHECK A: WAS THE UDT MESSAGE DISCARDED AT SP A?

CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B.

CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.1.1 | | | +| REFERENCE: 4.2/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | +| SUBTITLE: UDTs deliverable to SCCP user. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that a UDTs message received at SP A can be delivered correctly to an SCCP user. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDTs message from SP B to SP A
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SSN at SP A available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
<----- UDTs
N-NOTICE ind.
<=====
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1.

2.

3.

4.

5. | Arrange SP B to generate a UDTs message to available subsystem at SP A.

Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.

CHECK A: WAS THE SCCP USER ADVISED OF AN APPROPRIATE REASON FOR RETURN?

CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B.

CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------|------|------|--|--|--|---|-------------------|------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | +| REFERENCE: 4.2/Q.714 | | | | | | | | | | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | | | | | | | | | | +| SUBTITLE: UDTS deliverable to other SP. | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that a UDTS message received at SP A can be sent correctly if the SCCP is able to send the message. | | | | | | | | | | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDTS message from SP B to SP A with:
– SCCP address information:
– GT
– route on GT
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data at SP A as follows:
– GT translated to DPC of SP C
– destination accessible | | | | | | | | | | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 2 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:

SP C SP A SP B
< UDTS            < UDTS

| | | SP C | SP A | SP B | | | | < | UDTS            < | UDTS | +| SP C | SP A | SP B | | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | | | | +| < | UDTS            < | UDTS | | | | | | | | | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | +|

1.


2.


3.


4.



5.



6.

|

Arrange SP B to generate a UDTS message to SP A with a GT to be translated at SP A to remote DPC and SSN.

Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor.

CHECK A: WAS UDTS MESSAGE CORRECTLY GENERATED BY SP A?

CHECK B: WAS THE POINT CODE OF SP C CONTAINED IN THE MTP ROUTING LABEL OF THE UDTS MESSAGE GENERATED BY SP A?

CHECK C: WERE THE PARAMETER FIELDS SET CORRECTLY AS INDICATED IN THE CHECK TABLE BELOW?

CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE?

| | | | | | | | | | | + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.1.2 (continued) | | +| CHECK TABLE (1/1) | | +| UDTS (SP A → SP C) | | +| 1) Return cause: | “Appropriate value” | +| Called Party Address | | +| 2) Point Code Indicator (Note): | 0 (Signalling point code is not included)
or
1 (Signalling point code is included) | +| 3) SSN Indicator: | 0 (SSN is not included)
or
1 (SSN is included) | +| 4) Global Title Indicator: | Don't care | +| 5) Routing Indicator: | Don't care | +| 6) Signalling Point Code (Note): | DPC of SP C (if Point Code Indicator equals to 1) | +| 7) Sub-system Number: | XXXXXXXX (if SSN Indicator equals to 1) | +| 8) Global Title (Note): | “Appropriate information” | +| Calling party address | “Appropriate information” | +| Data: | “Appropriate information” | +| NOTE – Inclusion of GT and/or DPC in Called Party Address is implementation dependent for this test. | | + +# **SCCP TEST SPECIFICATION** + +| | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------| +| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.2.1 | | | +| REFERENCE: 4.2/Q.714 | | | +| TITLE: Data Transfer. | | | +| SUBTITLE: UDTs undeliverable to SCCP user. | | | +| PURPOSE: To verify that a UDTs message to unavailable SCCP user received at SP A is discarded. | | | +| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1. Arrange the generation of a UDTs message from SP B to SP A
2. Arrange the SCCP routing control data as follows:
– SSN at SP A not available | | | +| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | +| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP ASP B
<----- UDTs
| | | +| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | +| 1. | Arrange SP A and SP B to generate a UDTs message to an unavailable sub-system at SP A. | | +| 2. | Record the message sequence and parameters using a signal monitor. | | +| 3. | CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT DATA WAS NOT DELIVERED TO SCCP USER. | | +| 4. | CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT NO MESSAGES EXCEPT THOSE FOR MANAGEMENT WERE SENT BY SP A TO SP B. | | +| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0ca93ac08a4eb029e2202d3ab4ef140a1971fff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eb29c9d6c7a6eac64becc5d40a688f3b9266f74ded391b8c069d44bfe448b6ab +size 148979 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..104a57fbd03964ffd2520508b2be42e03343d20f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f2468dfa77e8d32611a5fe8a2ebb904676994eeb54463226fd865698560c960c +size 8232 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..394ca6ea325ce62be6d41eee80bfa3d2a85bdbcb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fa4982cdc5cfe68c52750075a6a145f4296d9edd34657331ec22ed556bc19316 +size 85498 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7569b89d7a16654bfada3c526f3827318bde238b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0cb6a3a0da98d48a1bd4115bf1073f3dde90aa0e5d82037c04df66205bc10ee6 +size 41798 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d66d333b367f71dba5ab9cabd0f2bccb7395ea2f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.1-200108-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:03d5728e5985a136924f14d977997e22d9cbbd8e768a0d48854b206c1a2ab8ba +size 124292 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..092caff8a509cb61f1e217361cabb72513dd3f93 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:018063bd10c3dead318556a6218745dbbcdaf2323c75d440ba39594c4f3f90b9 +size 205184 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/043e64d41a3368d138ace3816fd26469_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/043e64d41a3368d138ace3816fd26469_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64a1e8aad486ba382eb7c15e69c972fe14bb6b75 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/043e64d41a3368d138ace3816fd26469_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca50245e302cce0ae6eff7678f4fb6d696c661da96a9fb8ca070b34181d984a8 +size 58707 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35d080739dd40d3a774e0eb22c42d16e417ea49a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:37391e71877b06c2c4ce6e4a5a4a2f55300c1d800b0363f7e92dfe256ea6e463 +size 8342 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..738daaf19aba370e31b0ed3af25636fc339dee1a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1fc5be9dda1be2713f75d66818d04e6082cd661f4d00a5790958fa700d7616c3 +size 71263 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f5918b3f48e982c1c8b8e0c1b1163d8ee3f412b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:80f043b791719c030f41f125aec0113827b62bba891ec4d3e9b060720bd63356 +size 42137 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39f2e5a396ce38354a99e3e7dfc842e5f2a2d8d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:26f86d4a9f6ead5d1af708d23e791c38601e9c9effb2990800bf0628da55191a +size 50642 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0a9939e83db75b37809b0434aec7e8c89e347fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bd7a699d6ef4a5d2e1779896c25bd5a6e934548b58a7952d8e40ebd2f0d499e2 +size 77990 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cc5530ca748fb66cebc9195c77393235220acf7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b710e371003ca985c7df0dd15363018c4311a8f584ce3b35134b795ef56841ca +size 73161 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69080a8b121dd358c6392c6d8fe56fe1fbc88655 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:960b0d92239ae2c3431379f367027c5d3ab5a07851a9c0e55357de2530967795 +size 35792 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d24e7ec8edb054cadc6e1c0f3eebbfe55c44e31 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816.2-200703-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,2151 @@ + + +International Telecommunication Union + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**Q.816.2** + +(03/2007) + +SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING + +Q3 interface + +--- + +**CORBA-based TMN services: Extensions to +support service-oriented interfaces** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.2 + +ITU-T + +![ITU logo](1d7527f4316cfe2d342b08d1653d1592_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a stylized globe with a red lightning bolt striking across it. To the right of the globe, the text "International Telecommunication Union" is written in a blue, sans-serif font, with "ITU" in a larger, bold font above it. + +ITU logo + +International +Telecommunication +Union + +# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS + +## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING** + +| | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 | +| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 | +| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 | +| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 | +| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 | +| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 | +| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 | +| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 | +| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 | +| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 | +| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 | +| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 | +| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 | +| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3999 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.2** + +# **CORBA-based TMN services: Extensions to support service-oriented interfaces** + +# **Summary** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.2 defines a set of TMN CORBA services required to support service-oriented interfaces. It specifies how the ORB and common object services should be used in a lightweight fashion for supporting service-oriented interfaces, and defines extensions to the TMN-specific support services defined in ITU-T Recommendations Q.816 and Q.816.1. A CORBA IDL module defining the interfaces to the new TMN-specific support services is provided. The new services and the lightweight use of other CORBA services, along with ITU-T Recommendation X.780.2, compose a framework for CORBA-based service-oriented TMN interfaces with a wide range of applications. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.2 was approved on 16 March 2007 by ITU-T Study Group 4 (2005-2008) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure. + +## **Keywords** + +Common object request broker architecture (CORBA), CORBA services, distributed processing, façade, interface definition language (IDL), managed object, managed system, managing system, service orientation, service-oriented façade object, TMN interface. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2008 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +###### Page + +| | | | +|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 1.1 | Purpose ..... | 2 | +| 1.2 | Application ..... | 2 | +| 2 | References..... | 3 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 5 | +| 4 | Abbreviations..... | 7 | +| 5 | Conventions ..... | 10 | +| 6 | Service-oriented interface design considerations ..... | 10 | +| 6.1 | Flexible use of façade design pattern ..... | 11 | +| 6.2 | Lightweight use of ORB..... | 12 | +| 6.3 | Use of session service by managed and managing systems ..... | 15 | +| 6.4 | Lightweight use of naming service..... | 15 | +| 6.5 | Lightweight use of notification service ..... | 18 | +| 6.6 | Lightweight use of telecom log service..... | 20 | +| 6.7 | Relationship to coarse-grained interface design considerations..... | 22 | +| 7 | Service-oriented framework and requirements overview ..... | 22 | +| 7.1 | Framework overview..... | 22 | +| 7.2 | Framework constituents overview..... | 24 | +| 7.3 | Relationships between service-oriented, coarse-grained and fine-grained frameworks ..... | 30 | +| 8 | Framework ORB and common object services usage requirements for supporting service-oriented interfaces ..... | 32 | +| 8.1 | ORB usage requirements ..... | 33 | +| 8.2 | Naming service ..... | 33 | +| 8.3 | Notification service ..... | 34 | +| 8.4 | Telecom log service..... | 40 | +| 8.5 | Concurrency control and object transaction services ..... | 41 | +| 8.6 | CORBAsecurity..... | 42 | +| 9 | Framework support services requirements for supporting service-oriented interfaces..... | 44 | +| 9.1 | Session service..... | 44 | +| 9.2 | Other ITU-T support services..... | 49 | +| 10 | Service-oriented compliance and conformance ..... | 49 | +| 10.1 | Standards document compliance ..... | 49 | +| 10.2 | System conformance ..... | 50 | +| 10.3 | Conformance statement guidelines..... | 53 | + +Annex A – Service-oriented framework support services IDL..... 54 + +    A.1 Module idlVersion . . . . . 55 + +    A.2 Module session . . . . . 55 + +    A.3 Module nmsSession . . . . . 56 + +    A.4 Module emsSession . . . . . 58 + +    A.5 Module emsSessionFactory . . . . . 59 + +Bibliography..... 61 + +# **CORBA-based TMN services: Extensions to support service-oriented interfaces** + +# **1 Scope** + +The TMN architecture defined in ITU-T Rec. M.3010 (2000) introduces concepts from distributed processing and includes the use of multiple management protocols. ITU-T Recs Q.816 and X.780 subsequently define within this architecture a framework for applying the common object request broker architecture (CORBA) as one of the TMN management protocols. In this approach, manageable network resources are modelled as software objects accessible using CORBA. Information models written in the CORBA interface definition language (IDL) describe the object interfaces. In the original CORBA TMN framework, each managed object class (MOC) is a CORBA IDL interface and so each manageable resource is an independent CORBA object identified and accessed by an interoperable object reference (IOR) that allows for location-transparency. CORBA-based TMN interfaces using the approach where each manageable resource is addressable with a unique IOR have become known as "fine-grained" interfaces. This approach flexibly allows each managed object to reside anywhere – but at the expense that managing systems have on hand an IOR for each managed object they wish to access. + +CORBA-based TMN interfaces where not an IOR need be assigned to each manageable resource have become known as "coarse-grained" interfaces. A coarse-grained TMN interface exposes a coarser level of abstraction between a managing system and a managed system for accessing manageable resources but without loss of any detail. At a coarse-grained TMN interface a CORBA object (with an IOR), which is used to access manageable resources having no IOR and invoke operations on them, is referred to as a façade, while an object that is accessed through a façade is referred to as a lightweight object. ITU-T Recs Q.816.1 and X.780.1 extend the framework to support coarse-grained interfaces where one or more façades are defined for each MOC. + +This Recommendation, along with ITU-T Rec. X.780.2, add specifications to the framework to enable it to support a service-oriented style of interaction between managing systems and managed systems in addition to the fine-grained and coarse-grained styles specified in the other framework documents. This style of interaction has certain benefits. For example, it can relieve a managing system from having to separately retrieve an identifier or a location information for each type or even each instance of manageable resource it wishes to access, and it can provide a more efficient and very flexible separation of behaviour and state of managed objects. By introducing the so-called "service-oriented façades" it also changes somewhat the way software may be structured on the managed systems, a flexibility which some managed system suppliers may prefer. + +The service-oriented framework adopts a lightweight specific use of CORBA to maximize interoperability and interface performance. As a consequence, the use of the naming service can be minimalistic and the use of the ORB and all common object services is lightweight by nature. + +A service-oriented architecture (SOA) is an architectural style that aims at maximizing service sharing, reuse and interoperability in distributed environments through loose coupling among interacting components that expose their behaviour through interfaces. In anticipation of the frequent discovery of new business opportunities or threats, an SOA aims at providing open and agile business solutions that can rapidly extend or change on demand, and so SOA-based solutions are composed of reusable services with published and standards-compliant interfaces. The service-oriented approach to CORBA interface design is intended to support efficient SOA interfaces and allow for growth and change as technologies and services are evolving. + +The scope of this Recommendation is the same as the fine-grained and coarse-grained TMN CORBA frameworks. These frameworks and the service-oriented extensions cover all interfaces in the TMN where CORBA may be used. These interfaces are OS-OS interfaces according to ITU-T Rec. M.3010, where one OS takes a client/manager role (e.g., an NMS) and the other OS takes a server/agent role (e.g., an EMS). To be concrete, the service-oriented framework support services IDL of Annex A refers to an NML-EML interface but it can be applied to any managing system and managed system. It is expected, however, that not all capabilities and services defined here are required in all TMN interfaces. This implies that the framework can be used for interfaces between management systems at all levels of abstractions (inter- and intra-administration at various logical layers) as well as between management systems and network elements. + +## 1.1 Purpose + +The purpose of this Recommendation and the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 is to extend the TMN CORBA framework to enable it to be used in a wider range of applications. The extensions enable a lightweight mode of interaction between the managing and managed systems which may be preferred in many situations. They also enable the endorsement of *de facto* CORBA services and information models usage which are recognized in the telecommunications industry. Thus, this Recommendation is intended for use by various groups specifying network management interfaces. + +## 1.2 Application + +ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 accompanies this Recommendation and extends the object modelling guidelines, the superclasses, and the standard sets of data types, exceptions, notifications and constants defined in ITU-T Recs X.780 and X.780.1. Collectively, ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 and this Recommendation define a *framework* for CORBA-based service-oriented TMN interfaces. + +ITU-T Rec. M.3010 provides, in its Amendment 1 (2003), conformance definitions for TMN interfaces between physical blocks. When CORBA is used as the TMN management protocol, the conformance criteria refer to the CORBA framework which provides more than one paradigm choice for ORB and CORBA services usage (Q.816-series ITU-T Recommendations) and information modelling in IDL (X.780-series ITU-T Recommendations). Currently these choices are the fine-grained and coarse-grained approaches. According to ITU-T Rec. M.3010 an operations system (OS) interface may make a claim, by level, of *TMN interface information conformance* for each management capability that the interface supports. The supported management capability sets shall be specified by an information model document. Level A, Level B and Level C are defined and distinguished only by the source of the information models that are applied to specify the managed object classes the OS interface supports. The applicable information models need to be specified and well-documented in: + +- ITU-T Recommendations, in case of Level A conformance; +- standards of other *de jure* or *de facto* standards bodies, in case of Level B conformance; +- a non-standard way, in case of Level C conformance. + +In all cases, implementation conformance statements proformas following the X.781-series of ITU-T Recommendations, as appropriate, shall be provided. + +Because ITU-T Recs X.780, X.780.1 and X.780.2 define slightly different approaches to modelling manageable resources on fine-grained, coarse-grained and service-oriented interfaces, interface model specifications will be slightly different for the fine-grained, coarse-grained and service-oriented framework paradigms. While information modelling according to ITU-T Recs X.780 and X.780.1 will always lead to Level A TMN interface information conformance, the lightweight information modelling according to ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 may lead to any conformance level. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +[1] ITU-T Recommendation M.3010 (2000), *Principles for a telecommunications management network (including Amendment 1 (2003); Amendment 2 (2005))*. + +[2] ITU-T Recommendations M.3050-series (2004), *Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM)*. + +NOTE – This series of Recommendations has the following structure: + +M.3050.0 – *eTOM – Introduction*. + +M.3050.1 – *eTOM – The business process framework*. + +M.3050.2 – *eTOM – Process decompositions and descriptions*. + +M.3050.3 – *eTOM – Representative process flows*. + +M.3050.4 – *eTOM – B2B integration: Using B2B inter-enterprise integration with the eTOM*. + +M.3050/Suppl.1 – *eTOM – ITIL application note*. + +M.3050/Suppl.2 – *eTOM – Public B2B Business Operations Map (BOM)*. + +M.3050/Suppl.3 – *eTOM to M.3400 mapping*. + +[3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.816 (2001), *CORBA-based TMN services (including Corrigendum 1 (2001); Corrigendum 2 (2002); Amendment 1 (2001); Amendment 2 (2002))*. + +[4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.1 (2001), *CORBA-based TMN services: Extensions to support coarse-grained interfaces*. + +[5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.821.1 (2001), *CORBA-based TMN alarm surveillance service*. + +[6] ITU-T Recommendation X.734 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-5:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management – Event report management function (including Corrigendum 1 (1994); Corrigendum 2 (1999); Amendment 1 (1995) and its Corrigendum 1 (1996))*. + +[7] ITU-T Recommendation X.735 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-6:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: Log control function (including Corrigendum 1 (2001); Amendment 1 (1995) and its Corrigendum 1 (1996))*. + +[8] ITU-T Recommendation X.780 (2001), *TMN guidelines for defining CORBA managed objects (including Corrigendum 1 (2001); Corrigendum 2 (2002); Amendment 1 (2002))*. + +[9] ITU-T Recommendation X.780.1 (2001), *TMN guidelines for defining coarse-grained CORBA managed object interfaces (including Corrigendum 1 (2002); Amendment 1 (2002))*. + +[10] ITU-T Recommendation X.780.2 (2007), *TMN guidelines for defining service-oriented CORBA managed objects and façade objects*. + +[11] ITU-T Recommendation X.920 (1997) | ISO/IEC 14750:1999, *Information technology – Open distributed processing – Interface definition language*. + +[12] OMG Document formal/98-07-01, *The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, Revision 2.2*. + +- [13] OMG Document formal/99-10-07, *The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification*, Revision 2.3.1. +- [14] OMG Document formal/01-02-33, *The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification*, Revision 2.4.2. +- [15] OMG Document formal/00-06-22, *Property Service Specification*, Version 1.0. See also *Chapter 13* of [34], July 1996. +- [16] OMG Document formal/04-10-01, *Lightweight Services Specification*, Version 1.0. +- [17] OMG Document formal/04-10-03, *Naming Service Specification*, Version 1.3. See also *Chapter 3* of [34], March 1995, and *Chapter 5* of [16], October 2004. +- [18] OMG Document formal/04-10-02, *Event Service Specification*, Version 1.2. See also *Chapter 4* of [34], March 1995, and *Chapter 6* of [16], October 2004. +- [19] OMG Document formal/04-10-13, *Notification Service Specification*, Version 1.1. See also OMG TC Document telecom/98-11-01, *Notification Service Joint Revised Submission*, November 1998. +- [20] OMG Document formal/03-07-01, *Telecom Log Service Specification*, Version 1.1.2. +- [21] OMG Document formal/02-05-15, *The Common Object Request Broker Architecture and Specification*, Revision 2.6.1. +- [22] OMG Document formal/04-03-12, *Common Object Request Broker Architecture: Core Specification*, Revision 3.0.3. See also OMG TC Document ptc/02-01-14, *Draft CORBA Core 3.0 consisting of CORBA Core 2.6 + Core and Interop RTF 12/2000 Changes + Components FTF Changes*, January 2002. +- [23] ETSI TS 132 150 V6.5.0 (2006), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) Concept and definitions* (3GPP TS 32.150 version 6.5.0 Release 6). +- [24] ETSI TS 132 303 V6.6.0 (2005), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Telecommunication management; Notification Integration Reference Point (IRP): Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)* (3GPP TS 32.303 version 6.6.0 Release 6). +- [25] ETSI TS 132 333 V6.1.0 (2006), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Telecommunication management; Notification Log (NL) Integration Reference Point (IRP): Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)* (3GPP TS 32.333 version 6.1.0 Release 6). +- [26] ETSI TS 132 111-3 V6.7.0 (2007), *Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Telecommunication management; Fault Management; Part 3: Alarm Integration Reference Point (IRP): Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)* (3GPP TS 32.111-3 version 6.7.0 Release 6). +- [27] TM Forum TMF814 Version 3.0, Multi-Technology Network Management (MTNM) NML-EML Interface: CORBA IDL Solution Set, *Supporting Document "Programmatic Versioning"*, file "versioning.pdf", March 2004. +- [28] TM Forum TMF814 Version 3.0, Multi-Technology Network Management (MTNM) NML-EML Interface: CORBA IDL Solution Set, *Supporting Document "Guidelines for Using the OMG Notification and Telecom Log Service"*, file "OMGservicesUsage.pdf", March 2004. +- [29] OASIS Document soa-rm (2006), *Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0*. + +# 3 Definitions + +The following terms used in this Recommendation are defined in ITU-T Rec. M.3010: + +- **interface;** +- **operations system (OS).** + +The following term used in this Recommendation is adapted from ITU-T Rec. X.700: + +- **managed object (MO):** The management view of a resource, as defined by ITU-T Rec. M.3050.1, that may be managed through the use of a management protocol (such as CORBA). + +NOTE 1 – ITU-T Rec. X.700 restricts the semantics of "resource" to resources which "provide interconnection capabilities" and "allow communications to take place"; it explicitly excludes resources which "provide data storage or processing capabilities". ITU-T Rec. M.3050.1 draws resources from the eTOM's application, computing and network domains. + +NOTE 2 – A managed object is characterized in terms of attributes it possesses, operations that may be performed upon it, notifications that it may issue, and its relationships with other managed objects. + +The following terms used in this Recommendation are adapted from ITU-T Rec. X.701: + +- **agent:** An OS which has taken an agent role. +- **agent role:** A role taken by an OS in which it is capable of performing management operations on managed objects and of emitting notifications on behalf of managed objects. +- **managed object class (MOC):** A named set of managed objects sharing the same (possibly named) set of attributes (the MOC's state) and the same (possibly named) set of operations and notifications (the MOC's behaviour). +- **managed system:** A synonym for agent. +- **manager:** An OS which has taken a manager role. + +NOTE 3 – Some products that implement the service-oriented framework use this term, or the term "object manager", as a synonym for service-oriented façade. + +- **manager role:** A role taken by an OS in which it is capable of issuing management operations and of receiving notifications. +- **managing system:** A synonym for manager. + +NOTE 4 – ITU-T Rec. X.701 defines the term "(management) interaction" and uses it to state more sophisticated definitions of agent and manager. + +The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in ITU-T Rec. X.703: + +- **notification.** + +NOTE 5 – ITU-T Rec. X.703: "*Information technology – Open Distributed Management Architecture*" provides the ODMA definition, or ODP-RM definition, of notification. ITU-T Rec. X.703/Amd.1: "*Support using Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA)*" relates this definition to the OMG event definition [18] (generic or typed event message), and hence to the OMG notification definition [19] (generic or typed or structured event message). + +The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.816 and in [18]: + +- **event channel.** + +The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in [19]: + +- **notification channel.** + +The following terms used in this Recommendation are defined in ITU-T Rec. X.734: + +- **event forwarding discriminator (EFD);** +- **event report.** + +The following terms used in this Recommendation are defined in ITU-T Rec. X.735 and in [20]: + +- **log**; +- **log record**. + +The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in [20]: + +- **notification log**. + +The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780.1: + +- **façade**. + +The following terms are defined in this Recommendation in harmony with [29]: + +- **service broker (SB)**: An entity, also known as service registry, which allows SPs to register (and maintain) SDs and allows SCs to find SDs in a location-transparent way. +- **service consumer (SC)**: An entity which seeks to satisfy a particular need through the use of capabilities offered by means of a service. +- **service description (SD)**: The information needed in order to use, or consider using, a service. See section 3.3.1 of [29]. + +NOTE 6 – The most important part of a service description is the association of one or more service interfaces that enable access to the capabilities provided by the service. + +NOTE 7 – When a service description includes constraints and policies, it is called a service contract. + +- **service interface (SI)**: The means by which all or part of the underlying capabilities of a service are accessed. It is a means for interacting with a service (see section 3.3.1.4 of [29]). + +NOTE 8 – A service interface delineates and exposes an external view of functionality of a service; it defines all or part of that service's action boundary. + +- **service-oriented approach/architecture (SOA)**: An ICT/IT&T architecture of services, policies, best practices and frameworks in which components can be reused and repurposed rapidly in order to achieve shared and new functionality. + +NOTE 9 – An SOA provides a uniform means to offer, discover, interact with and use capabilities to produce desired effects consistent with measurable preconditions and expectations. It is a paradigm for organizing and utilizing distributed capabilities that may be under the control of different ownership domains. It is an architectural style that aims at maximizing service sharing, reuse and interoperability in distributed environments through loose coupling among interacting components that expose their behaviour through interfaces. In anticipation of the frequent discovery of new business opportunities or threats, SOAs aim at providing open and agile business solutions that can rapidly be extended or changed on demand, and so SOA-based solutions are composed of reusable services with published and standards-compliant interfaces. SOA entities are accessible only through interfaces and connected by service descriptions. The SOA paradigm enables fast adaptation to changing business needs as well as cost reduction in the deployment of new services and maintenance of deployed services. + +- **service-oriented façade (SO façade)**: A synonym for service-oriented façade interface or for service-oriented façade object, depending on the context. +- **service-oriented façade interface (SO façade interface)**: An object interface defined to provide access to a set of service-oriented managed objects, and optionally also to other objects. +- **service-oriented façade object (SO façade object)**: An object which exists in the managed system and provides, in a steward role, access to allocated service-oriented managed objects, and optionally also to other objects, of the managed system. It is an instance of an SO façade. + +- **service-oriented managed object (SO MO)**: A managed object which is only accessible via an assigned service-oriented façade and provides behaviour (operations and notifications) to managing systems not directly but only through behaviour of its assigned façade. + +NOTE 10 – A managed object represents a manageable resource in terms of state (attributes) and behaviour (operations and notifications). Functional components of the managed object such as state and behaviour can be distributed either in an implementation or in its interface definition or in both. A service-oriented managed object is a managed object whose state and behaviour are distributed in the interface definition; its state is left with the object while its behaviour is delegated to a steward object, namely its assigned façade. Whether this also implies a separation of the managed object implementation is not visible at the interface; it is an implementation-defined issue that is left to the managed system's discretion. + +- **service provider (SP)**: An entity that offers the use of capabilities by means of a service. +- **service resource (SR)**: A physical or logical source or sink of data, or a state-aware either synchronous or asynchronous ICT/IT&T data/signal processing capability. + +NOTE 11 – Service resources are used by services to deliver and maintain (persistent or temporary) data. When the data is specified by an information model, service resources can be used to construct service interfaces and processable service descriptions (i.e., metadata). Examples of service resources are network elements, network infrastructure items (e.g., connectivity or profile information), software/firmware, database systems, and COTS technology components. + +- **SOA service**: A means by which the needs of a consumer are brought together with the capabilities of a provider, and which is realized as a set of behaviours that are accessible through, or are using, one or more service interfaces. Refer to section 3.1 of [29] for details. + +NOTE 12 – An SOA incarnates any service as one or more entities that expose service interfaces. A service in a provider role constitutes an action boundary regarding access and control between one or more service resources and one or more consumers of the resources. + +# 4 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| 3GPP | 3rd Generation Partnership Project | +| AMI | Asynchronous Messaging Invocation | +| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode | +| BPON | Broadband Passive Optical Network | +| CBTS | CORBA-Based TMN Services (ITU-T Rec. Q.816) | +| CCBTS | Coarse-grained CORBA-Based TMN Services (ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1) | +| CCS | Currency Control Service | +| CM | Configuration Management | +| CMIP | Common Management Information Protocol | +| CORBA | Common ORB Architecture | +| COS | Common Object Service(s) | +| COTS | Commercial Off-The-Shelf technology | +| CSI | Common Secure Interoperability | +| DIOA | Distributed Interface-Oriented Architecture | +| DN | Distinguished Name | + +| | | +|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DSL | Digital Subscriber Line | +| EFD | Event Forwarding Discriminator | +| EML | Element Management Layer | +| EMS | Element Management System | +| eTOM | enhanced Telecom Operations Map | +| fd | filterable data | +| FIFO | First In, First Out | +| GDCCMO | Guidelines for Defining Coarse-grained CORBA Managed Object Interfaces (ITU-T Rec. X.780.1) | +| GDCMO | Guidelines for Defining CORBA Managed Objects (ITU-T Rec. X.780) | +| GDMO | Guidelines for the Definition of Managed Objects (ITU-T Rec. X.721/X.722) | +| GDSOCMO | Guidelines for Defining Service-Oriented CORBA Managed Objects (ITU-T Rec. X.780.2) | +| GIOP | General Inter-ORB Protocol | +| ICT | Information and Communications Technology | +| ID | Identifier | +| IDL | Interface Definition Language | +| IIOP | Internet Inter-ORB Protocol | +| IIOP/SSL | IIOP over SSL | +| IIOP/TLS | IIOP over TLS | +| IKE | Internet Key Exchange | +| IOP | Inter-ORB Protocol | +| IOR | Interoperable Object Reference | +| IPSec | IP Security | +| IRP | Integration Reference Point | +| IT | Information Technology | +| IT&T | Information Technology & Telecommunication(s) | +| LDAP | Lightweight Directory Access Protocol | +| MO | Managed Object | +| MOC | Managed Object Class | +| MOO | Multiple Object Operation | +| MTNM | Multi-Technology Network Management | +| NE | Network Element | +| NGOSS | New Generation Operations Systems and Software | +| NL | Notification Log | +| NML | Network Management Layer | +| NMS | Network Management System | + +| | | +|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| NV pair | name/value pair with name being a string and with a "name=value" semantics | +| OAM&P | Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning | +| OASIS | Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards | +| OCN | Object Creation Notification | +| ohf | optional header field | +| OMG | Object Management Group | +| OO | Object-Oriented | +| OOAD | Object-Oriented Analysis and Design | +| ORB | Object Request Broker | +| OS | Operations System | +| OTS | Object Transaction Service | +| OTS | OMG Transaction Service | +| PIM | Platform Independent Modelling | +| PKI | Public Key Infrastructure | +| PM | Performance Management | +| POA | Portable Object Adapter | +| PSM | Platform Specific Modelling | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| RFP | Request For Proposal(s) | +| SB | Service Broker | +| SC | Service Consumer | +| SD | Service Description | +| SECIOF | Secure Inter-ORB Protocol | +| SECP | Security Protocol | +| SI | Service Interface | +| SO | Service-Oriented | +| SOA | Service-Oriented Approach/Architecture | +| SOCBTS | Service-Oriented CORBA-Based TMN Services (ITU-T Rec. Q.816.2) | +| SOF | Service-Oriented Façade | +| SP | Service Provider | +| SR | Service Resource | +| SS | Solution Set | +| SSL | Secure Sockets Layer | +| SSL/TLS | SSL or TLS | +| TC | Technical Committee | +| TCA | Threshold Crossing Alert | +| TCP | Transmission Control Protocol | + +| | | +|-------|-----------------------------------------------| +| TII | Time-Independent Invocation | +| TLS | Transport Layer Security | +| TMN | Telecommunications Management Network | +| TS | Technical Specification | +| UML | Unified Modelling Language | +| UMTS | Universal Mobile Telecommunications System | +| UTRAD | Unified TMN Requirements, Analysis and Design | + +# 5 Conventions + +A few conventions are followed in this Recommendation to make the reader aware of the purpose of the text. While most of the Recommendation is normative, paragraphs succinctly stating mandatory requirements to be met by a management system (managing and/or managed) are preceded by a boldface "R" enclosed in parentheses, followed by a short name indicating the subject of the requirement, and a number. For example: + +**(R) EXAMPLE-1** An example mandatory requirement. + +Requirements that may be optionally implemented by a management system are preceded by an "O" instead of an "R". For example: + +**(O) EXAMPLE-2** An example optional requirement. + +The requirement statements are used to create compliance and conformance profiles. + +Examples of CORBA IDL are included in this Recommendation, and normative IDL specifying the TMN-specific framework support services, and associated data types, is included in Annex A. The IDL is written in a 9-point courier typeface: + +``` +// Example IDL +void getManager( + in string managerName, + out common::Common_I managerInterface) +raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); +``` + +Annex A contains source code that implementers will want to extract and compile. It is normative and should be used by developers implementing systems that conform to this Recommendation. Refer to clause 5.2/Q.816.1 for recommendations with regard to cutting and pasting the IDL of this Recommendation into plain text files that may then be compiled. For example, the entire IDL file "itut\_q816\_2.idl" can be generated by cutting Annex A from the Microsoft® Word® version of this Recommendation and saving as "Text Only with Line Breaks". This IDL file contains some ordinary comments and a large number of formatted comments to be parsed by compilers used to convert IDL to HTML for easier reading. A formatted comment begins with /\*\* and ends with \*/ and is associated with the next IDL construct. HTML formatting tags are allowed with these comments as are certain keywords (preceded by a '@' symbol) that are converted by the IDL-to-HTML compilers into additional formatting. Users of the IDL may want to generate HTML as the resulting HTML files have links that make for quick navigation through the files. + +# 6 Service-oriented interface design considerations + +This clause identifies several design considerations that should be addressed by the framework as support for lightweight use of CORBA through service-oriented interfaces is added. + +CORBA realizes a distributed interface-oriented architecture (DIOA) where location-transparent objects expose one or more interfaces for access to their encapsulated state and behaviour. The concepts of coarse-grained object modelling and service-oriented architecture (SOA) resolve issues + +with object-oriented analysis and design (OOAD) best practices. Classical OOAD focuses on the class level, i.e., encapsulates behaviour and related data in the same object. This has become known as "fine-grained" approach. A general "coarse-grained" approach uses the *façade* design pattern1 to separate state and behaviour (and share the state) of some classes, i.e., the behaviour of some (shared) objects is no longer controlled by themselves but by façade objects. In a coarse-grained object-oriented approach, data is still encapsulated but data access and control are organized at a separate upper level which results in coarser "grains" being accessed and controlled. + +ITU-T Recs Q.816.1 and X.780.1 use a specific form of the façade design pattern (e.g., an X.780.1 façade can only provide access to a single MOC) and other design considerations to define support for coarse-grained interfaces. This Recommendation, along with ITU-T Rec. X.780.2, define a lightweight generic use of the façade design pattern which, together with other lightweight design considerations, generalize the coarse-grained approach (and therefore indirectly also the fine-grained approach). This novel approach to interface design is called "service-oriented" since it paves the way for introducing SOA principles to the TMN interface specification methodology. CORBA-based service orientation requires the flexibility of application-specific access granularity where well-defined sets of TMN entity types are accessed through assigned façades with IORs (see clause 4.2.1/X.780). Refer to clause 7.3 below and clause 12/X.780.2 for a thorough description of the relationships between the three approaches. Additional information is available from [53]. + +The design considerations related to CORBA services concern the lightweight and service-oriented use of the ORB, the use of session objects to control the communication between managing and managed systems, and the lightweight use of naming, notification and telecom log services. + +## 6.1 Flexible use of façade design pattern + +The coarse-grained framework introduces façades but also requires certain coupling conditions between a façade and the managed objects that are accessible through the façade. For example, a managed system shall provide at least one façade interface for each class of managed objects that may be instantiated on it, even if these objects also support direct CORBA interfaces, and may provide multiple façade interfaces for a given class of managed objects. These requirements effectively reduce the coarse-grained approach to a sort of class-grained approach. Refer to Appendix I/Q.816 for the concepts of class-grained approach and grain-neutral approach. + +A coarse-grained interface is created by first defining a fine-grained interface according to the guidelines defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780 which cover both creating GDMO-like IDL interfaces from scratch as well as translating a GDMO interface to IDL. Once a fine-grained interface is defined, façade interfaces for each of the managed object interfaces are developed according to rules defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780.1. The fine-grained managed object interface specifications shall be retained. All of the other constructs defined for the fine-grained interface, including data types, value types, exceptions, notifications, and factories, are reused without modification on the coarse-grained interface. As a major example, ITU-T Rec. M.3120 applies the X.780 and X.780.1 guidelines to ITU-T Recs M.3100 and G.855.1 and translates manually all of their GDMO interfaces to first fine-grained and then coarse-grained CORBA IDL interfaces. + +A service-oriented interface *can* depend on predefined coarse-grained or fine-grained interfaces but usually does not. The service-oriented approach requires the introduction of *service-oriented façades*, which are CORBA objects, and *managed objects*, which are accessed and controlled + +--- + +1 The façade design pattern [52] is a structural pattern with the intent to provide a unified interface to a set of interfaces in a subsystem. A façade defines a higher-level interface that makes the subsystem easier to use. A façade promotes loose coupling between the subsystem and its clients. Loose coupling makes it possible to vary the components and interfaces of the subsystem without affecting its clients. + +(preferably exclusively) through service-oriented façades2. Both types of objects are instantiated at the managed system. Only loose coupling between managed objects and service-oriented façades is required from the outset (see clause 7.2.1.1) leaving detailed relationships to the discretion of the managed system, which may also support dynamic binding of managing systems to one or more service-oriented façades (i.e., systems interactions are established and broken dynamically at run time and not yet defined statically at design time). + +While transition from a fine-grained model to a coarse-grained model is defined *bottom-up* through deterministic rules for coarsening of a fine-grained interface, transition from a service-oriented model to a coarse-grained or fine-grained model would be defined (if required someday) *top-down* through rules for stepwise refining of a service-oriented interface according to ITU-T Recs X.780.1 and X.780. However, the service-oriented approach mainly promotes coexistence of fine-grained, coarse-grained and (information model-dependent) service-oriented interfaces, and initially does not aim at transition of one TMN interface kind to another. + +## 6.2 Lightweight use of ORB + +The OMG CORBA specifications 2.2 [12], 2.3 [13] and 2.4 [14] consist of several parts for several aspects of CORBA that shall or should be offered by compliant ORB vendors. See also ITU-T Rec. X.920. Most important for use by the TMN frameworks are the following *two aspects of CORBA*: + +- **IDL modelling repertoire of ORB products:** these are mainly the chapters 3 "OMG IDL Syntax and Semantics" and 5 "Value Type Semantics" of the CORBA specifications; +- **built-in basic CORBA system services of ORB products:** these are mainly the chapters 4 "ORB Interface" and 11 "The Portable Object Adapter" of the CORBA specifications. + +The lightweight use of the first aspect, *the IDL repertoire and modelling*, including IDL style considerations (in compliance with [51] and similar to Annex D of [23]), is specified in the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 whilst the lightweight use of the second aspect, *the basic CORBA system services*, is specified in this Recommendation. + +Revisions 2.2 and 2.3 of CORBA introduced the *portable object adapter (POA)* and *value types*, respectively. Both capabilities are required by the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks. These requirements are implied in the explicit requirement that the supported version of CORBA shall be 2.3.1 or later. The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks do specify neither separate POA features nor individual value type features required for ORB compliance. + +CORBA Revision 2.4 introduced among other things *Minimum CORBA* and *CORBA Messaging*, in particular asynchronous messaging invocation (AMI) including time-independent invocation (TII). Minimum CORBA aims for ORB size reduction and overall performance improvements. It omits the features from the CORBA and PortableServer modules of the CORBA specification that support the run-time aspects of CORBA (e.g., dynamic interfaces at client side or server side, interceptors, dynamic mode of POA operation) and indicates conformant ways for vendor-specific optimizations. CORBA messaging standardizes and quality assures asynchronous requests, which previously could be issued only with the "ORB best effort" semantics of one-way operations using + +--- + +2 Some products that implement the service-oriented framework use the term "object manager" or just "manager", as a synonym for service-oriented façade. Another synonym sometimes used is "managing object" in contrast with managed object. Evolving managed objects to "service-oriented managed objects" means separating their state and behaviour, and outsourcing the behaviour to assigned "managing objects" that take a steward role regarding the operations and notifications of their allocated managed objects. This fundamental SOA principle can also be described as separating the *definition and storage of data* from the *delivery of data*. Since the terms "managing object" and "manager" may give rise to misunderstandings with regard to the managing role of systems and subsystems, this Recommendation mainly uses the term "service-oriented façade" but may sometimes use the synonyms for explanation purposes. + +application-specific callback objects. It also provides support for "persistent" requests. It is based on an IDL-to-"implied-IDL" mapping that is carried out by messaging-enabled IDL code generators when generating language-specific client stubs. Every (synchronous) IDL operation is copied to an asynchronous operation whose signature is changed by adding either a callback interface (reply handler) as input parameter or a (queriable) poller value type (reply wrapper) as return value. + +### 6.2.1 Use of dynamic and asynchronous capabilities + +This clause discusses *the basic CORBA system services aspect* of CORBA with regard to the service-oriented framework. + +Though being CORBA-specific, the service-oriented framework supports OMG's platform independent modelling (PIM) in UML and aims at the introduction of SOA principles to the TMN interface specification methodology UTRAD (see M.3020-series ITU-T Recommendations). SOA is interface-oriented and defines two views on components: the inward view of a service consumer, who requires and consumes one or more interfaces, and the outward view of a service provider, who implements and provides interfaces. A core SOA principle is a loose coupling of components that interact according to the publish-find-negotiate-bind-execute paradigm, which implies the possibility of dynamic binding, unbinding and rebinding between a required interface and a located provided interface. Refer to clause 7.2.1.2 for a summary of the basic SOA artefacts. + +As a consequence, the dynamic and asynchronous aspects of CORBA are very important for the specification of service-oriented interfaces even though some of them are a bit sophisticated. But another SOA principle is ease of component development and deployment which is enabled by lightweight features. This framework therefore adopts a stepwise approach to run-time and asynchronous CORBA features, which extends the fine-grained and coarse-grained interface design approaches to ORB usage. The following steps are defined: + +- mandatory use of the POA as defined by Minimum CORBA (Note 1); +- optional use of dynamic mode of POA operation; +- optional use of other dynamic aspects of CORBA omitted by Minimum CORBA; +- use of one-way operations with application-specific callback objects only in exceptional and provisional cases and then only in conjunction with a synchronization policy as specified by CORBA Messaging; as a rule TMN IDL interfaces are defined to be synchronous; +- optional use of transient asynchronous requests as defined by the AMI specification and further detailed in clause 6.4/Q.816 (Note 2); +- optional use of persistent asynchronous requests as defined by the TII specification. + +The service-oriented framework therefore concurs with the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks regarding the use of POA and AMI except that it allows quality assured one-way operations in exceptional and provisional cases. It adds a prioritization of optional capabilities whose details and impacts on CORBA services usage (e.g., transactional asynchronous requests) are for further study. As a consequence, version 2.2 or later of CORBA shall be supported. From an IDL modelling point of view, CORBA 2.3 is only needed when value types shall be used (see clause 6.2.2/X.780.2). From a run-time performance point of view CORBA 2.3 may be beneficial for the processing of unbounded sequences, which are heavily used in COS and telecom IDL specifications (and even with complex members such as nested strings), since ORB products that implement CORBA 2.3 are said to treat all kinds of variable-length structures more efficiently. CORBA 2.3 also offers improved type code techniques for introspection and manipulation of the IDL type *any*. Furthermore ORB interoperability strongly depends on the ORB version (see clause 8.6). + +NOTE 1 – Support of basic POA capabilities and exclusion of preceding object adapters ("BOA begone") is important to all frameworks because it enables implementations based on a framework to scale up to millions upon millions of instantiated objects, a magnitude required for telecommunications network management applications, and ensures portability between ORB products. The object adapter is the built-in CORBA mechanism that connects a request with the right code to service that request. A programming language entity such as a C++ object that implements requests on one or more CORBA objects, i.e., operations of one or more CORBA interfaces, is called a servant. The POA achieves maximum portability between ORBs, minimizes for a request the implementation code route covered to connect to the incarnating servant and process the request, and allows to persistently store object states between operation invocations. Using the POA is a *conditio sine qua non* when implementing fine-grained interfaces. For coarse-grained and service-oriented interfaces the POA provides, besides ORB portability, also considerable performance advantages when few servants are called with exceedingly high frequency. These considerations do show that the object adapter will no longer be a potential bottleneck for scaleability and overall performance but they need to be supplemented by considerations for the lightweight use of the Naming Service (see clause 6.4). + +NOTE 2 – Asynchronous requests are a client side (i.e., managing system) programming language mapping issue. The server side is not affected by invocation policies of clients but sticks to always expecting to be invoked synchronously. To allow nevertheless synchronous clients to make non-blocking requests on a CORBA object, which may be required to avoid poor performance due to network latency, the service-oriented framework recommends that CORBA servers (i.e., managed systems) implement multithreading (e.g., by using a thread pool policy with appropriate locking granularity). The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks require the client side to implement multi-threading in case the AMI is not used. Within the service-oriented framework, multi-threaded managing systems are optional. + +### 6.2.2 IDL repertoire and ways of MOC specification + +This clause addresses *the IDL repertoire and modelling aspect* of CORBA with regard to the service-oriented framework. + +The CORBA IDL-related constituents of the service-oriented framework are described in the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2, including the minimum IDL repertoire that should be used, based on the service-oriented object model IDL and the service-oriented CORBA modelling guidelines. A particularly important part is the modelling of managed objects and service-oriented façades, which inherit from a set of common attributes called *Common\_T* (which is a virtual struct) respectively from a root service-oriented façade interface called *Common\_I* (which is virtual). The *Common\_I* façade interface specifies among other things the setter/mutator functions for the settable common attributes. All three frameworks group the attributes of managed object types into separate entities, the managed object classes (MOCs), which can be interfaces or be instantiated (by the managed system or the managing system or both, as specified) to non-CORBA managed objects that are identifiable by distinguished names. The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks require value types as the grouping mechanism, while the service-oriented framework allows for more flexibility in TMN interface design and defines *four alternative ways of MOC specification*: + +- an MOC may be an `interface` that has the attributes as CORBA attributes or explicitly defined accessor (and mutator) functions; +- an MOC may be a `struct` that has the attributes as record members; +- an MOC may be a `valuetype` that has the attributes as public state members; +- an MOC may be a CORBA sequence of name/value pairs with `string` names and any values, i.e., an MOC may be of type `sequence`, that has the attributes as name/value pairs with a "name=value" semantics. + +Refer to ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for details and recommendations for the use of the respective way of MOC specification. As a rule, OMG specifications define properties of entities as name/value pairs with `string` names and any values [12], [13], [14], [15] and [19] but also introduce such name/value pairs with `string` values [17]. To support and enable extensibility, the service-oriented framework makes vigorous use of free format name/value pairs where the name and the value are both a simple `string`. Companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 also specifies rules and guidelines for *the* + +*lightweight definition of operations, exceptions and notifications.* Since the three TMN CORBA frameworks are meant to be used for the management of telecommunications networks, ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 moreover specifies rules for the IDL modelling of multiple telecom transmission technologies according to the principles of ITU-T Recs G.805 and G.809. This is *the multi-technology part* of the service-oriented framework, which can also be used together with the coarse-grained and fine-grained frameworks. + +## 6.3 Use of session service by managed and managing systems + +The session service provides capabilities to manage a client/server connection between a managing system and a managed system, which is called a session. It enables either a client or a server to detect the loss of communication with the associated party. For a single session between a managing system and a managed system, there are two session objects. One is maintained on the managing system (client); the other one is maintained on the managed system (server). + +A session object has a read-only attribute that contains a reference to the session object on the other side (managing/managed system) to which the object is associated. This attribute allows for callback invocation of the associated session object and to check in case of communication failure if the association is still valid. Loss of communication may be detected through a `ping` operation, and a one-way `endSession` operation allows for a controlled disconnect between parties that releases all resources allocated for this session object and destroys the object. + +A client session provides operations for callback by the server in case of notification losses and termination of a loss period. A server session provides operations to query the names of the supported managing objects (manager interfaces), to retrieve for each supported manager its object reference to gain access to it without using the naming service, and to retrieve the object reference of the unique event channel to be used by the managing system in this session. + +To enable the session service, the managed system (server) registers one or more instances of the EMS session factory interface with the naming service, which then constitutes the unique entry point(s) to the managed system. The managing system instantiates a client session object and calls the `getEmsSession` operation of an EMS session factory, together with authentication data, to request instantiation and association of a server session object and return of its object reference. Before establishing a session with the managed system, the managing system may use the version check facility of the EMS session factory to avoid connection with an unpopular IDL version. + +## 6.4 Lightweight use of naming service + +A CORBA *name component* is a pair of strings that is called an `id/kind` pair since it is of type `struct NameComponent {string id; string kind;};`. A CORBA *name* is a list of name components, that is a CORBA name is of type `sequence`. An OMG naming service [17] maps CORBA names, or name components, to IORs. A name-to-IOR, or name component-to-IOR, association is briefly called a (name, or name component,) *binding*. A *naming context*, or just a *context* for short, is a CORBA system object, namely an instance of the `CosNaming::NamingContext` interface, which stores bindings by implementing a table that maps unique CORBA names, or name components, to IORs. Different names, or no name, can be bound to any individual IOR in the same or different naming contexts. A binding can refer to an application object or another naming context of the same or a federated naming service. + +The bindings of a naming service are usually depicted as a CORBA *naming graph* that shows context IORs with hollow nodes, application IORs as solid/filled nodes, and arrows between nodes representing the bindings. Each binding arrow is labelled with the binding's name part and points to its IOR part, and so collectively the arrows originating from an individual context node represent its binding table. In a given context, any CORBA name is represented by a sequence of nodes that originates from this context and traverses the naming graph until a leaf is reached. In particular, each node of a naming graph represents a CORBA name component. The ORB can be configured + +to initialize with whatever naming service instance one wants, and provides an operation to obtain, at run time during the bootstrap phase of the managing or managed system, the IOR of the configured *Initial Naming Context* of this local naming service, which is often orphaned. An *Initial Naming Context* is not a root context, i.e., CORBA names are only relative distinguished names, except when only a single naming service or a hierarchical federation structure is used in the environment of the considered managing and managed systems, but a fully connected federation structure guarantees the same name regardless of which *initial naming context* is used. + +A context provides operations to construct and modify the naming graph segment originating from it: binding and rebinding to objects, binding and rebinding to contexts, unbinding from objects, creating a new unbound context, creating a new bound context, and destroying a context. The incomplete usage of these operations can result in orphaned contexts (being unreachable from any federated naming service) and dangling bindings (having invalid IORs). A context also provides the `resolve` operation to retrieve the IOR bound to a CORBA name in the given context, and the `list` operation to iterate through the (potentially extraordinarily large number of) bindings of the given context by using a binding iterator (see clause 9.4/X.780.2). + +The OMG has defined a *Lightweight Naming Service* specification (see chapter 5 of [16], chapter 3 of [17]), which is a compatible subset of the fully-fledged "heavyweight" service and intended to make the naming service suitable for use in resource-constrained environments. The definition and most design considerations are also suitable for supporting the design goals of service-oriented environments. Whilst the heavyweight service should be seen as an extension of the lightweight service, for backward compatibility reasons the lightweight service is formally defined by disabling certain operations and entire interfaces of the fully-featured service (through preprocessor directives, or additional exceptions, or just documentation). The following capabilities of a context are disabled: binding and rebinding to contexts, creating a new unbound context, listing a context (i.e., all bindings of the given context). A *lightweight naming service* also disables the interfaces `BindingIterator` (used by the `list` operation) and `NamingContextExt : NamingContext` (used for converting between CORBA names, stringified names and URL schemes), and it does in fact hide the bindings of all of its naming contexts by disabling the pertinent type definitions. + +The disablement of naming service capabilities as defined by the *lightweight naming service* specification has the following consequences: + +- a lightweight CORBA naming graph is a tree, a CORBA *naming tree*, since names cannot be bound to contexts but only new bound contexts can be created; +- the current bindings cannot be retrieved, even in case of a small naming tree where the use of a binding iterator would not be required. + +The first consequence is appreciated for use by the service-oriented framework but would be too restrictive for usage in a federation environment where initial naming contexts need to be bound to contexts of other federated naming services. The second consequence is generally considered too lightweight, since it requires auxiliary means to keep track of the construction of the naming tree or too rigid naming tree specifications. Instead the implementation of a `list` operation without use of a binding iterator is recommended at least. Also the stringification and destrinification of CORBA names may be needed (see clause 10.3/X.780.2). Refer to clause 8.2 for the detailed specification of the *service-oriented naming service* and to clause 6.4.3 for examples. + +### 6.4.1 Minimalistic use of naming service + +When the managed system (server) implements the session service, it registers only EMS session factory interface instances with the naming service. Access to all other CORBA objects, especially service-oriented façades, is provided through objects of the session service without using the naming service. This lightweight paradigm is called "minimalistic use of naming service". + +### 6.4.2 Naming of managed objects and service-oriented façade objects + +To achieve the objective of lightweight and SOA-styled use of CORBA through service-oriented interfaces, the resources in a managed system that need to be managed are defined as service-oriented managed objects (also known as second-level or lightweight objects). These managed objects are accessed and controlled through service-oriented façade objects (i.e., CORBA objects). CORBA objects possess an IOR. The managed objects (usually) are not CORBA objects and do not possess an IOR and thus relieve the management systems of the burden of storing and maintaining huge numbers of IORs for managed objects. Service-oriented managed objects are identified by names. Refer to the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for details. The CORBA naming of façade objects and the relationship between managed object names and façade object names depends on whether the managed system implements the session service, which allows for a minimalistic use of the Naming Service. Refer to clauses 6.4.3 and 8.2.1 for details. + +### 6.4.3 Lightweight CORBA naming trees + +The service-oriented framework recommends the CORBA naming graph to be a *lightweight tree* by restricting the possible kinds of its nodes (i.e., the admissible values of the `kind` attribute) and their ordering, and adding simultaneously multi-vendor capability for identifying in a unified way the vendors of the registered managed systems that implement the service-oriented façades. The following *kinds of CORBA name components* are defined by the service-oriented framework (see clause 10.5.4/X.780.2 for further details): + +- "Class": denotes an OS-OS interface class, which is specified in CORBA IDL; +- "Vendor": denotes an OS vendor; +- "EmsInstance": denotes a server OS (e.g., an EMS); +- "Version": denotes an IDL version of the parent OS-OS interface class; +- "EmsSessionFactory\_I": denotes a server session factory (see 9.1.2.5); +- "Common\_I": denotes a generic service-oriented façade (see clause 9.3/X.780.2); +- : denotes a specific service-oriented façade; +- : denotes an OMG event channel (e.g., a notification channel, a NotifyLog). + +An example of a service-oriented CORBA naming tree is depicted in Figure 1 below. + +The figure uses to indicate the name value of an EMS name and to indicate a vendor name both according to the conventions of clause 10.3/X.780.2. It shows four OSes of the same vendor, which all implement the same IDL version. The OS-OS interface class "TMF\_MTNM" specifies the TM Forum MTNM NML-EML interface TMF814 (see [27] and [28]). The left-hand OS does not implement the session service but the three shown service-oriented façades of MTNM. The third and fourth OSes are bound to the second OS indicating that they are subordinate to it (e.g., the second OS could be a domain management system that federates two element management systems). Note that the figure can easily be extended to multiple vendors. + +![Figure 1 – Example of service-oriented CORBA naming tree. A hierarchical tree diagram starting from an 'Initial Naming Context' root, branching down through Class, Vendor, EmsInstance, Version, and various Manager/Factory/Log/Channel nodes.](c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Root((Initial Naming Context)) --> TMF((id = TMF_MTNM +kind = Class)) + TMF --> Vendor((id = +kind = Vendor)) + Vendor --> EmsInst1((id = +kind = EmsInstance)) + Vendor --> EmsInst2((id = +kind = EmsInstance)) + Vendor --> EmsInst3((id = +kind = EmsInstance)) + Vendor --> EmsInst4((id = +kind = EmsInstance)) + EmsInst1 --> Ver1((id = 3.0 +kind = Version)) + EmsInst2 --> Ver2((id = 3.0 +kind = Version)) + EmsInst3 --> EmsInst3_Sub((id = +kind = EmsInstance)) + EmsInst3_Sub --> Ver3((id = 3.0 +kind = Version)) + EmsInst4 --> Ver4((id = 3.0 +kind = Version)) + Ver1 --> MgmtMgr((id = +kind = ManagedElementMgr_I)) + Ver1 --> EquipMgr((id = +kind = EquipmentInventoryMgr_I)) + Ver2 --> EmsSess1((id = +kind = EmsSessionFactory_I)) + Ver3 --> EmsSess2((id = +kind = EmsSessionFactory_I)) + Ver3 --> NotifyLog((id = +kind = NotifyLog)) + Ver4 --> EmsSess3((id = +kind = EmsSessionFactory_I)) + Ver4 --> NotifyChan((id = +kind = NotifyChannel)) + MgmtMgr --> Leaf1((id = +kind = MultiLayerSubnetworkMgr_I)) + EquipMgr --> Leaf2((id = +kind = EmsSessionFactory_I)) + EmsSess2 --> Leaf3((id = +kind = EmsSessionFactory_I)) + NotifyLog --> Leaf4((id = +kind = NotifyLog)) + NotifyChan --> Leaf5((id = +kind = NotifyChannel)) + +``` + +Figure 1 – Example of service-oriented CORBA naming tree. A hierarchical tree diagram starting from an 'Initial Naming Context' root, branching down through Class, Vendor, EmsInstance, Version, and various Manager/Factory/Log/Channel nodes. + +Figure 1 – Example of service-oriented CORBA naming tree + +Refer to clause 8.2 below and clause 10.5.4/X.780.2 for further details. Figure 5/X.780.2 specifies in detail the above-listed kinds of lightweight CORBA name components together with their *id* values. Table 4/X.780.2 specifies the hierarchical order of the lightweight CORBA naming tree. + +### 6.4.4 Storage of names and object containment relationships + +In the coarse-grained framework, the façade interfaces are bound to names in an OMG naming service, much the same way the support service interfaces are. On interfaces that use façades, however, the managed objects' names are not required to be bound to IORs in the naming service. Instead, a new service for façade-accessible managed objects is introduced, the containment service, as a common place to store managed object names and containment relationship information. Clause 9.6.1/Q.816.1 provides a certain rationale for the containment service, which explicitly excludes the alternative to store managed object names in the façade objects. + +The service-oriented framework stores as few façade IORs in a naming service as reasonably possible and allows for the façade objects as alternative storage locations of managed object names and containment relationships. This option is not only a more lightweight means of managed object name administration but also eliminates the threat for performance issues with the containment service, which basically is a more complicated Naming Service, that are well-known with regard to the naming service in the context of fine-grained interfaces. It also provides an element of federation (instead of centralization) since the storage is distributed across multiple façades. + +## 6.5 Lightweight use of notification service + +The OMG event service [18] allows for asynchronous exchange of event messages between clients by introducing *Event Channels* and *Typed Event Channels* that broker events, *Event suppliers* that provide events, and *Event consumers* that process events. It distinguishes *Generic Events* and *Typed Events*. It specifies the *push model*, where suppliers communicate event data by invoking the *push* operation on the *PushConsumer* interface, and the *pull model*, where consumers request event data by invoking the *pull* or *try\_pull* operation on the *PullSupplier* interface. Both models realize a + +state synchronization mechanism between the consumer (e.g., a CORBA object of a managing system) and the supplier (e.g., a CORBA object of a managed system) according to the publish-subscribe paradigm (also known as observer design pattern, see clause 9.1.1). + +The push model could be used without an event channel, if the supplier-side system provides an interface with an `attach` operation that can be called by the consumer-side system with the (stringified) IOR of a `PushConsumer` instance. The pull model could be used without an event channel, if the supplier-side system provides an interface with an `attach` operation that returns the (stringified) IOR of a `PullSupplier` instance and can be called by the consumer-side system with the (stringified) IOR of an interface that provides a parameterless `update` operation. This usage, where consumers and suppliers are callback objects (see also clause 9.1), is not specified for the event service, however. Instead event channels and associated `Admin(istrative)` and `Proxy` objects are used to manage connections between suppliers and consumers and to deliver events. Event channels separate concerns by decoupling the communications between suppliers and consumers; they avoid tight couplings of callback objects that do not scale well as their number increases. + +The OMG has also defined a *Lightweight Event Service* specification (see chapter 6 of [16], chapter 3 of [18]), which is a compatible subset of the fully-fledged "heavyweight" service and intended to make the event service suitable for use in resource-constrained environments. It is formally defined by disabling both the pull model and typed events. These lightweight event service design considerations are also suitable for supporting the design goals of service-oriented environments, when seen in conjunction with the lightweight capabilities of the notification service. + +The OMG notification service [19] enhances the simplistic Event Service by *Structured Events* and *Event Batches* (i.e., sequences of Structured Events), *Notification channels*, a *Notification channel factory*, Notification Service style *Proxy* objects and *Admin* ( $\equiv$ Proxy group) objects, message *QoS properties configuration* capabilities (at channel, Admin, Proxy and event levels), channel *Admin properties configuration* capabilities, comprehensive *Event Filtering* capabilities (at Admin and Proxy levels, based on event content or properties settings), and reliable event delivery with *Event Acknowledgement* based on *Sequence numbers*. Notification channels support well-defined translations between the message formats *Any* (i.e., Generic), *Typed*, and *Structured*. In case of "Any $\rightarrow$ Typed" and "Structured $\rightarrow$ Typed", a specific format is expected for the input message that is also used for the output message in case of "Typed $\rightarrow$ Any" and "Typed $\rightarrow$ Structured". + +The structured event header includes an *Event type* attribute with syntax `CosNotification::_EventType` consisting of a *Domain name* for the vertical industry domain the event supplier belongs to, or the OS-OS interface class that defines the event in CORBA IDL, and a *Type name* that shall be unique within a given domain (e.g., an OS-OS interface class such as TMF MTNM or a 3GPP IRP). The notification service provides the optional capability to *share subscriptions and offers* between channels and clients (i.e., suppliers and consumers), i.e., to convey end-to-end the knowledge of which event types are required from suppliers and which might be produced by them. This event discovery and coordination capability can be a great efficiency booster, in particular when used together with an *Event Type Repository* as specified by the Notification Service. + +The push and pull models of the Notification Service could be used without channels by enabling consumers and suppliers to be tightly coupled callback objects. Consumers and suppliers would exchange IORs of `PushConsumer` and `PushSupplier`, respectively `PullConsumer` and `PullSupplier`, interface instances (as defined by the `CosNotifyComm` module). But this framework recommends the use of notification channels and Proxy objects to enable loose coupling of consumers and suppliers thereby avoiding the disadvantages of the callback paradigm. + +The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks require use of structured or typed events with typed events being the preferred choice (and even declared an intended direction). Event batches are optional and generic events (i.e., Anys) are not allowed. The use of typed events has the advantage + +of avoiding the general use of the IDL type `any`, which relies on type code techniques and detailed documentation, but requires the definition and use of an interface that provides the events as operations (and further provisions for the pull model). Therefore ITU-T Rec. X.780 defines the interface `Notifications` whose operations represent typed events and whose operations parameter names and values represent the contents of the filterable body of structured events. + +The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks also support the 3GPP Notification IRP [24]. This specification uses event batches, an event batch with only one element being equivalent to a structured event, and defines the interface `NotificationIRP` to be used collectively with notification service interfaces and with, or without, notification channels. It requires support of the push model and offers support of the pull model as an option. It points out that use of notification channels and related Proxy and Admin objects could allow a malicious IRPManager (i.e., managing system) to compromise the integrity of the IRPAgent (i.e., managed system), if no appropriate authentication and authorization mechanisms are in place (see clause 7.2.4). + +The service-oriented framework requires use of the push model with structured events. Typed events and event batches are optional and generic events (i.e., `Anys`) are not allowed. The framework therefore complies with OMG's *Lightweight Event Service* specification (replacing generic events by structured events though). It recommends the efficient support of on-demand pulling of events, and alarms in particular, through IDL operations without using the Notification Service. It supports the options of the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks, including the 3GPP Notification IRP, but enhances them with a more lightweight alternative. + +Instead of an IDL interface that would define (typed) events as operations, ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 defines the CORBA module `notifications` whose data types are used to specify the event types and the content of most items of the filterable body portion of structured events (see clause 8.7/X.780.2). As a consequence, the service-oriented framework is able to fully support the guidelines for using the OMG Notification Service defined by TM Forum's MTNM specification [28]. + +The IDL definition of events as operations is a valuable option to fix all details of event definitions in a compilable way though this objective could easily be achieved by using structs or value types. But these approaches are not well extensible. So the actual use of typed events has extensibility, and hence backward compatibility, issues and is far less lightweight and flexible than the use of structured events, which were introduced just because of issues with typed events and in order to support highly optimized event filtering. Using filter objects with typed events is less efficient since upon receipt of a typed event a notification channel will disassemble the event into a sequence of name/value pairs, where each name and value identifies an input parameter value of the operation that was invoked to transmit the event to the channel. This name/value pair sequence is then used to evaluate the constraints of all filter objects associated with relevant Proxy and Admin objects. + +The service-oriented framework also recommends a unified and lightweight use of the event filtering and QoS and Admin properties configuration capabilities of the notification service, which complies with the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks and the 3GPP and MTNM specifications. Refer to clause 8.3 below and clause 8.7/X.780.2 for further details. + +## 6.6 Lightweight use of telecom log service + +The companion ITU-T Recs X.735 and X.734 define the related *Log control function* and *Event report management function*, which are based on managed object classes specified in ITU-T Rec. X.721 (top; log; discriminator, event forwarding discriminator (EFD); log record, event log record). Figure 2 below, which is taken from these Recommendations, shows the impact of notifications emitted by managed objects (due to MO-specific events) to log processing and event processing. Event reporting is the ability to specify conditions to be satisfied by a potential event report emitted by a particular managed object in order to be sent to specified destinations. Logging is the ability to preserve information about events that may have occurred or operations that may + +have been performed by or on managed objects or management support objects, and to determine which potential log records or received event reports are to be logged. While the notification service realizes X.734 event reporting, the telecom log service realizes X.735 logging. + +![Figure 2: Relationship between event report and log management models. The diagram shows two parallel processing paths. The top path starts with 'Managed object' (three overlapping circles) sending 'Notifications' to 'Log pre-processing' (cloud shape), which then outputs 'Potential log records' to 'Logs' (two overlapping circles). 'Logs' receives 'Event reports' from the right. The bottom path starts with 'Managed object' sending 'Event reports' to 'Event pre-processing' (cloud shape), which outputs 'Potential event reports' to 'EFDs' (two overlapping circles). 'EFDs' send 'Responses' to 'Logs'. Below the diagram, 'Control' and 'Responses' are shown with arrows pointing to the 'Logs' and 'EFDs' components. A label 'Q.816.2(07)_F02' is in the bottom right corner.](043e64d41a3368d138ace3816fd26469_img.jpg) + +Figure 2: Relationship between event report and log management models. The diagram shows two parallel processing paths. The top path starts with 'Managed object' (three overlapping circles) sending 'Notifications' to 'Log pre-processing' (cloud shape), which then outputs 'Potential log records' to 'Logs' (two overlapping circles). 'Logs' receives 'Event reports' from the right. The bottom path starts with 'Managed object' sending 'Event reports' to 'Event pre-processing' (cloud shape), which outputs 'Potential event reports' to 'EFDs' (two overlapping circles). 'EFDs' send 'Responses' to 'Logs'. Below the diagram, 'Control' and 'Responses' are shown with arrows pointing to the 'Logs' and 'EFDs' components. A label 'Q.816.2(07)\_F02' is in the bottom right corner. + +**Figure 2 – Relationship between event report and log management models** + +During a pre-processing phase, discriminator input objects (potential log records or potential event reports) are generated and then tested according to the log's or EFD's discriminator construct attribute, which encapsulates filtering constraints. The log control or event report management function creates and deletes logs and log records or discriminators and retrieves attributes of log records or discriminators according to ITU-T Rec. X.730, and the log control function reports log alarms according to ITU-T Rec. X.733. Both management functions notify state changes according to ITU-T Rec. X.731, and attribute value changes as well as object creations and deletions according to ITU-T Rec. X.730. Further details about these management functions are specified in ITU-T Recs X.735 and X.734. + +The OMG telecom log service [20] defines interfaces for *Logs*, *Log managers*, and *Log factories*, and the structure of *Log records* and *Log events*. A log factory is a log manager which is also a consumer Admin object as defined by the event or notification service. *Event logs* or *Notification logs* are event or notification channels as defined by the event or notification service. Notification logs can have associated filters. Event or notification log factories are collection managers for event or notification logs and manage supplier Proxy objects for their logs (i.e., event or notification channels) with associated filters in the notification case. The telecom log service also defines typed log records and typed event or notification logs. By leveraging features of event and notification channels, event and notification logs can form a federated log network that supports "log-and-forward" scenarios. Built-in lightweight features of the telecom log service are those of the event service, i.e., disabling the pull model and typed events. The OMG *lightweight log service* [35] is not at all suitable for telecom applications. + +The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks state for the notification part of the telecom log service the same requirements as for a plain notification service and provide a profile for the operations of the log part. The service-oriented framework requires almost the same usage and recommends that managing systems use logs owned by managed systems in a more lightweight + +fashion. It adds the 3GPP notification log IRP [25] and some clarifications with regard to the representation of log events and of event data in log records. Refer to clause 8.4 for details. + +## 6.7 Relationship to coarse-grained interface design considerations + +A service-oriented interface design provides considerably more flexibility than a coarse-grained interface design. Therefore a given service-oriented design need not be specializable to a coarse-grained design. But for the following reasons, a given coarse-grained design can always also be considered a service-oriented design: + +- a façade, as defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780.1, is a service-oriented façade, as defined by this Recommendation, if and only if its allocated managed objects (all of which instantiate the same MOC) are all service-oriented, i.e., are only accessible via the façade; +- ORB usage as specified by clauses 5.2/Q.816 and 6.4/Q.816 for fine-grained interfaces, and adopted by ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 for coarse-grained interfaces, is an option for service-oriented interfaces though a more lightweight use of the ORB is preferred (see clause 6.2); +- use of the OMG naming service on coarse-grained interfaces (see clause 6.1/Q.816 and clause 8.1/Q.816.1) is an option for service-oriented interfaces though a more lightweight or even minimalistic use of the Naming Service is preferred (see clause 6.4); +- use of the notification, telecom log, transaction and security OMG services as specified by clauses 6.2/Q.816, 6.3/Q.816, 6.6/Q.816 and 6.5/Q.816 for fine-grained interfaces, and adopted by ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 for coarse-grained interfaces, are options for service-oriented interfaces though a more lightweight use is preferred (see clauses 6.5 and 6.6 and clause 8); +- use of the factory finder, channel finder, terminator, basic MOO, advanced MOO, heartbeat and containment ITU-T services as specified by subclauses of clause 7/Q.816 and clause 9/Q.816.1 for fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces are not needed for service-oriented interfaces when other options of the SO framework are chosen (see clause 7.2.5). + +Therefore when a TMN interface is designed according to the coarse-grained framework (which depends on the fine-grained framework), a service-oriented interface design will result in any case. By choosing in the course of the design process suitable options of the service-oriented framework (e.g., lightweight use of CORBA services), an appropriate lightweight design will result. + +# 7 Service-oriented framework and requirements overview + +Clause 6 outlined the design considerations that should be resolved as support for service-oriented interfaces is added to the framework. This clause and the rest of this Recommendation provide details on how the framework will be extended to address these issues. This Recommendation focuses on the framework support services for service-oriented interfaces, while ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 defines guidelines for developing or adopting/endorsing information models for service-oriented interfaces including lightweight generic façades to access and control managed objects. First, an overview of the service-oriented framework is presented, then an overview of its constituents. + +## 7.1 Framework overview + +The service-oriented framework for CORBA-based TMN interfaces is a collection of capabilities. A central piece of the framework is a set of lightweight OMG common object services. The framework defines their role in network management interfaces, and defines conventions for their use. The framework also defines lightweight support services that have not been standardized as OMG common object services but, as a rule, are expected to be standard on network management + +interfaces conforming to the service-oriented framework. IDL interfaces for these services are defined in Annex A. To support the software objects representing manageable resources, the framework recommends that they implement some *common* basic capabilities. Therefore, two base classes are defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for use in modelling the state and behaviour of network management resources. Managed and managing object classes in IDL models shall either inherit and implement a basic set of capabilities from these superclasses in order to operate within this framework, or refer to a well-established and standardized information model that specifies the *common* attributes of managed objects and the *common* operations of managing objects. + +![Figure 3 – Overview of service-oriented framework. The diagram illustrates the architecture of the framework. At the top, 'Conventions' include Standard Data Types, Notification Specifications, and Other Conventions. Below this, 'Superclasses' are defined: Service-Oriented Façade and Service-Oriented Managed Object. In the center, 'Application-specific Objects' are shown: Some Service-Oriented Façade and Some Service-Oriented Managed Object. Relationships include 'inherits' from application objects to superclasses and 'manages' from a façade to a managed object. On the right, 'Services' like Session Service are shown. At the bottom, 'CORBA-based TMN services' (Naming Service, Notification Service, Telecom Log Service) are listed, some with database icons. All layers sit on top of the 'CORBA 2.2 ORB'.](2bacc162a73d75c43a7f90715832bd13_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + subgraph Conventions + C1[Standard Data Types] + C2[Notification Specifications] + C3[Other Conventions] + end + + subgraph Superclasses + S1[Service-Oriented Façade] + S2((Service-Oriented Managed Object)) + end + + subgraph Application_specific_Objects [Application-specific Objects] + A1[Some Service-Oriented Façade] + A2((Some Service-Oriented Managed Object)) + end + + subgraph Services + SV1[Session Service] + SV2(( )) + end + + subgraph TMN_Services [CORBA-based TMN services] + TS1[Naming Service] + TS2[Notification Service] + TS3[Telecom Log Service] + TS1_(( )) + TS2_(( )) + TS3_(( )) + end + + A1 -- inherits --> S1 + A2 -- inherits --> S2 + A1 -- manages --> A2 + SV1 --> SV2 + TS1 --> TS1_ + TS2 --> TS2_ + TS3 --> TS3_ + + Conventions --- Superclasses + Superclasses --- Application_specific_Objects + Application_specific_Objects --- Services + Services --- TMN_Services + TMN_Services --- ORB[CORBA 2.2 ORB] + +``` + +Figure 3 – Overview of service-oriented framework. The diagram illustrates the architecture of the framework. At the top, 'Conventions' include Standard Data Types, Notification Specifications, and Other Conventions. Below this, 'Superclasses' are defined: Service-Oriented Façade and Service-Oriented Managed Object. In the center, 'Application-specific Objects' are shown: Some Service-Oriented Façade and Some Service-Oriented Managed Object. Relationships include 'inherits' from application objects to superclasses and 'manages' from a façade to a managed object. On the right, 'Services' like Session Service are shown. At the bottom, 'CORBA-based TMN services' (Naming Service, Notification Service, Telecom Log Service) are listed, some with database icons. All layers sit on top of the 'CORBA 2.2 ORB'. + +**Figure 3 – Overview of service-oriented framework** + +The framework is depicted graphically in Figure 3 above. The figure shows the framework in grey. In the middle are the **application-specific objects** that are supported by the framework. Since the service-oriented framework is capable of supporting any information model (see clause 1.2), only *some* service-oriented façade that manages *some* managed object (resource) are shown. + +Along the bottom is a box representing the CORBA ORB. Above that are a number of boxes with names in them representing the **CORBA-based TMN services** that are part of the service-oriented framework. Some also have icons depicting the databases they would have to maintain to perform their functions. The managed object name database maintained by the naming service is shown with dotted lines, indicating that it need not store the names and IORs of managed objects. The naming service is still required, however, to enable managing systems to find façade interfaces and support service references or at least an entry point to the managed system. The authentication and access log database of the session service is optional. The use of a database by the notification service to persistently store events, in case of connection loss between a channel and a consumer and configured guaranteed delivery, is optional. The use of these CORBA services, along with ORB version requirements, are defined in this Recommendation. + +Along the top of the figure are icons representing two **superclasses**, one for managed objects and one for managing objects (service-oriented façades), which are derived from each specified information model. Each of the managed objects and managing objects supported by this framework shall ultimately inherit from these superclasses, respectively. The managed objects are shown drawn with dotted lines, to indicate that they need not be directly accessible. Also shown on the figure are icons of pages with up-turned corners representing standard object modelling **rules and conventions** that are defined for information modellers developing IDL models for use with this framework. These conventions and the two superclasses are defined in ITU-T Rec. X.780.2, along with a couple of other service-oriented information modelling guidelines. + +## 7.2 Framework constituents overview + +The *CORBA services-related* constituents of the framework (ORB, OMG services, ITU-T services) are described in this Recommendation and its *CORBA IDL-related* constituents are described in the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 (superclasses, rules and conventions, naming of managed objects and service-oriented façades, service-oriented CORBA modelling guidelines, IDL repertoire and style guide for use by IDL modellers, modelling of multiple transmission technologies according to ITU-T Recs G.805 and G.809, standardized modelling of extensions, *et al.*). + +### 7.2.1 Façade design pattern and service-oriented façades + +The most significant change to the fine-grained framework required to support coarse-grained interfaces is the way managed objects are accessed and controlled, namely through the use of the façade design pattern (see clause 6.1). Using the façade design pattern, a managed system will support a small number of façade interfaces, at least one but usually no more than a few for each type of managed object on the system. A managing system will then (logically) invoke an operation on a managed object by actually invoking the operation on a façade for that type of managed object on that system. In the façade design pattern, the managed objects do not have to expose a CORBA interface and hence may not have individual IORs. This means a managed system that supports the façade approach does not need to implement the fine-grained managed object interfaces. These principles of the coarse-grained framework are retained for the service-oriented framework in a more flexible way with additional options. + +It is best to think of a service-oriented façade, abbreviated as "SO façade", not as a managed object, though it is managed by a managing system, but as an intermediary object that enables a managing system to manage proper managed objects representing manageable resources. A service-oriented façade is therefore also called a "managing object" or a "manager". The façade object has a CORBA interface and is accessible using CORBA. The proper managed objects, however, usually do not have CORBA interfaces and so are not directly accessible using CORBA. The façade itself does not represent a manageable network resource; its purpose is to enable or facilitate interaction with the objects that do represent manageable resources. A façade exposes behaviour of the managed objects it "manages", i.e., controls and provides access to, but may also expose own behaviour (e.g., present its capabilities). All façade objects are instantiated by the managed system during startup or restart or during session instantiation, and destroyed during shutdown or ending of the session. There are no service-oriented façade factories. Multiple façades for the same type of managed objects may exist on a coarse-grained interface, but usually not on a service-oriented interface. Any managed object shall always be accessible through only one (and always the same) façade. Figure 4 below summarizes *the managing and managed entities of the service-oriented framework*, i.e., the managing and managed system, the managed objects and the façades. + +![Diagram illustrating the relationship between a Managing system and a Managed system. The Managing system can access the Managed system through two types of façade interfaces: SO façade and Façade. The SO façade is used to access SO managed objects (MOs) which are only accessible through the SO façade. The Façade is used to access MOs which can be accessed either through the Façade or directly. A legend defines the symbols: SO façade (Service-oriented façade), Façade (X.780.1 façade), MO (Managed object), and a symbol for CORBA Interface.](c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a 'Managing system' box on the left. Two arrows originate from it: a solid blue arrow labeled 'only' pointing to an 'SO façade' box, and a dashed black arrow labeled 'or' pointing to a 'Façade' box. Both 'SO façade' and 'Façade' boxes are inside a larger 'Managed system' box. From the 'SO façade', three arrows point to three dashed circles labeled 'MO'. From the 'Façade', three arrows point to three solid circles labeled 'MO'. To the right of the 'Managed system' box is a legend: a blue box labeled 'SO façade' with the text 'Service-oriented façade'; a blue box labeled 'Façade' with the text 'X.780.1 façade'; a circle labeled 'MO' with the text 'Managed object'; and a symbol consisting of a vertical line with a horizontal tick at the top, labeled 'CORBA Interface'. + +Diagram illustrating the relationship between a Managing system and a Managed system. The Managing system can access the Managed system through two types of façade interfaces: SO façade and Façade. The SO façade is used to access SO managed objects (MOs) which are only accessible through the SO façade. The Façade is used to access MOs which can be accessed either through the Façade or directly. A legend defines the symbols: SO façade (Service-oriented façade), Façade (X.780.1 façade), MO (Managed object), and a symbol for CORBA Interface. + +**Figure 4 – SO façade and façade of a managed system** + +The figure shows a managing system accessing a managed system that supports the service-oriented approach. The managed system has two façade interface instances that enable the managing system to access two different sets of managed objects. The managed objects at the top of the figure can only be accessed through the SO façade. The managed objects at the bottom also support direct CORBA interfaces and can be accessed either through the façade or directly. They are not service-oriented. Direct CORBA access of managed objects is optional and only specified for reasons of compatibility with the coarse-grained framework. A managed system that supports the real service-oriented façade approach shall provide SO façade interfaces (i.e., managing object classes) for each of its managed object classes and instantiate only SO managed objects. + +A façade may use a managed object's CORBA interface, if available, to invoke an operation on it, or some other implementation-specific means. How SO façades invoke operations on SO managed objects is not exposed at the interface. A managed system, in fact, need not even implement managed objects as individual objects internally. By implementing a CORBA TMN interface based on this framework, however, it will give the illusion that managed objects are internally implemented as objects since they are exposed at the interface as objects of their own. + +When an operation is invoked on a managed object through a façade, the façade must then logically invoke the operation on the actual managed object. Because very many managed objects will be accessed through a single façade, the façade must know which managed object is the actual target of the operation. This will be handled by adopting the convention of including the name of the target managed object as the first parameter of every façade operation directed at a managed object. See for example the set functions of the *Common\_I* interface in Annex A/X.780.2. + +#### 7.2.1.1 Relating managed objects to their service-oriented façade + +The coarse-grained framework defines a means to determine the assigned façade of a managed object solely from its name by extending the name definition. The service-oriented framework supports this mechanism but also defines a lightweight alternative through a set of information modelling rules. Refer to clause 7.2.1.1 of the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for details. + +#### 7.2.1.2 Relationship to SOA concepts + +The service-oriented framework specifies a novel approach to CORBA TMN interface design that paves the way for introducing SOA principles [29] to the TMN interface specification methodology. A *service* (i.e., an SOA service) is a means by which the needs of a consumer are brought together with the capabilities of a provider, and which is realized as a set of behaviours that are accessible + +through, or are using, one or more service interfaces. Therefore a *service interface* (SI) is a means for interacting with the service that exposes this SI for the purpose of accessing all or part of the service's underlying capabilities, or indicating all or part of the service's needs. SIs are the most important part of a *service description* (SD), which provides all information needed in order to use, or consider using, a service. When an SD includes constraints and policies, it is called a *service contract*, and its SIs are termed contract-defined or contractual. SOAs incarnate any service as one or more entities that expose SIs. A *service resource* (SR) is defined here as a physical or logical source or sink of data, or a state-aware synchronous or asynchronous data processing capability. SRs are used by services to deliver and maintain data. When the data is specified by an information model, SRs can be used to construct SIs and processable SDs (i.e., service metadata). + +SOAs introduce two views on services (and resources): the outward view of a *service provider* (SP), who implements and provides interfaces (depicted as balls or lollipops), and the inward view of a *service consumer* (SC), who requires and consumes interfaces (depicted as sockets or crescents). A service may assume either a client/consumer role or a server/provider role with respect to another service, depending on situation and intended use. A service in a provider role constitutes an action boundary with regard to access and control between the allocated service resources and potential consumers of the resources. A provided service interface delineates and exposes an external view of functionality of a service and defines all or part of that service's action boundary. + +The *conceptual metamodel of an SOA architectural style* is based on the concepts of consumer and provider that interact according to the publish-locate-[negotiate-]bind-execute paradigm: + +- SPs *publish* SDs, or optionally register SDs with a *service broker* (SB) (also known as *service registry*). SPs own and maintain their published or registered SDs. +- An interested SC can *locate* an SD, which always comes with one or more SIs, by using either public location information obtained from the SP or optionally a public SB to find the SD. +- The SC parametrizes the SIs according to the SD, or optionally *negotiates* parameters for the behaviours of the needed SIs, in order to *bind* the behaviours and establish a concrete service contract with the SP. The SC then establishes a technology-specific *binding* to a (secure) transport mechanism supported by the SP (according to the SD). Finally the SC invokes the needed behaviours of SIs, in order to *execute* service capabilities. The SP does not disclose how the invocation of a behaviour is implemented, delegated or composed. +- That way the service capabilities provided by the SP through the SIs of the published service (description) can be consumed by the SC according to the SD. The capabilities allow the SC to access and control the SRs that are allocated to the service (according to the SD). + +The distinction between service interfaces and service resources reflects the **SOA principle** of separating the definition and storage of (shared) data (through service resources) from the delivery of data (through service interfaces) (see clause 6.1). A service-oriented managed object, as defined by this Recommendation, is a *managed entity* that represents a manageable service resource in terms of shared state (attributes) and behaviour (operations, notifications, transactions) where state and behaviour are separated through outsourcing of the behaviour to an assigned so-called "*managing entity*" (e.g., a service and its SIs) that takes a steward role with regard to the behaviours of its allocated managed entities. Another **SOA principle** is loose coupling of service components that make up a composite service and interact according to the publish-locate-[negotiate-]bind-execute paradigm across internal SIs. This implies the potentiality of dynamic binding, unbinding and rebinding at run time between an implemented and provided SI and a fitting required and consumed SI according to an orchestration conducted by the underlying business processes. + +The presented SOA artefacts are depicted graphically in Figure 5 below. + +![Figure 5 – Conceptual metamodel of an SOA architectural style. The diagram shows the interactions between a Service consumer, Service provider, Service broker, Service description, Service interface, Service, and Service resource. Numbered arrows (1-5) indicate key interactions: 1. Service provider publishes SD or registers SD with Service broker; 2. Service consumer locates SD or finds SD from Service broker; 3. Service consumer negotiates parameters and binds SI to Service description; 4. Service consumer invokes behaviours of SI to execute service capabilities; 5. Service provider accesses and controls SR internally. A 'brokers SD' arrow points from Service broker to Service description. A 'implements SI' arrow points from Service provider to Service interface. A 'Q.816.2(07)_F05' label is in the bottom right.](c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg) + +Figure 5 – Conceptual metamodel of an SOA architectural style. The diagram shows the interactions between a Service consumer, Service provider, Service broker, Service description, Service interface, Service, and Service resource. Numbered arrows (1-5) indicate key interactions: 1. Service provider publishes SD or registers SD with Service broker; 2. Service consumer locates SD or finds SD from Service broker; 3. Service consumer negotiates parameters and binds SI to Service description; 4. Service consumer invokes behaviours of SI to execute service capabilities; 5. Service provider accesses and controls SR internally. A 'brokers SD' arrow points from Service broker to Service description. A 'implements SI' arrow points from Service provider to Service interface. A 'Q.816.2(07)\_F05' label is in the bottom right. + +**Figure 5 – Conceptual metamodel of an SOA architectural style** + +The SOA concepts correspond to the concepts of the service-oriented TMN framework as follows: + +- service provider $\approx$ managed system (server); +- service consumer $\approx$ managing system (client); +- SOA service $\approx$ set of one or more service-oriented façade interface instances (i.e., managing objects), or other CORBA interface instances (i.e., CORBA objects); + +NOTE – For example, any CORBA interface instance that inherits from the *Common* interface (i.e., the service-oriented façade superclass – see [ITU-T Rec. X.780.2]) is an SOA service. Another example of an SOA service is the session service that implements an *EMS session factory* interface, an *EMS session* interface and an *NMS session* interface (see clause 7.2.3). Further examples of SOA services are OMG's common object services [34] that implement one or more CORBA interfaces. + +- service interface $\approx$ CORBA IDL interface; +- service description with associated service interfaces/contracts $\approx$ all CORBA IDL interfaces of the façades, or other CORBA objects, that make up the service; +- service resource $\approx$ SO managed object (i.e., manageable (network) resource that is accessible and provides behaviour only through its assigned SOA service); +- service broker $\approx$ ORB together with naming service or session service (or trading service). + +Applying this mapping to Figure 4 results in Figure 6 below. Note that direct access to service resources is not allowed for real SOAs. + +![Figure 6: SOA concepts of the service-oriented TMN framework. The diagram shows a 'Service consumer' on the left interacting with a 'Service provider' on the right. The 'Service provider' contains two 'Service' boxes, each with a 'Service interface' (a small circle) and multiple 'Service resource' (SR) boxes (circles with a horizontal line at the bottom). Arrows show the consumer connecting to the service interfaces, and the services connecting to their respective SRs. A legend on the right defines the symbols: a 'Service' box for SOA service, an 'SR' circle for Service resource, a small circle for Service interface, and a horizontal line for CORBA interface.](7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg) + +Figure 6: SOA concepts of the service-oriented TMN framework. The diagram shows a 'Service consumer' on the left interacting with a 'Service provider' on the right. The 'Service provider' contains two 'Service' boxes, each with a 'Service interface' (a small circle) and multiple 'Service resource' (SR) boxes (circles with a horizontal line at the bottom). Arrows show the consumer connecting to the service interfaces, and the services connecting to their respective SRs. A legend on the right defines the symbols: a 'Service' box for SOA service, an 'SR' circle for Service resource, a small circle for Service interface, and a horizontal line for CORBA interface. + +**Figure 6 – SOA concepts of the service-oriented TMN framework** + +The managed system is therefore *decomposed into services* and the TMN interface offered by the managed system is *decomposed into provided service interfaces* (lollipops). The managing system is not decomposed, i.e., required service interfaces (crescents) are not explicitly modelled. + +### 7.2.2 ORB version and IDL repertoire + +Clause 6.2 describes the two aspects of CORBA, to be provided by ORB vendors, that are most important for the TMN frameworks: *the IDL modelling aspect* according to the supported IDL repertoire and *the CORBA services aspect* according to the supported ORB system interfaces. The scope of each aspect depends on the ORB version, and the three Revisions 2.2 [12], 2.3 [13] and 2.4 [14] were identified as basic ORB versions to be considered for particular features of the aspects. + +The service-oriented framework mandatorily requires the *use of the POA as defined by Minimum CORBA*, and so requires at least CORBA Revision 2.2. Further features of the two aspects that are beyond CORBA 2.2 (e.g., use of *value types* or *CORBA Messaging*) are optional. + +### 7.2.3 Session service + +Refer to clause 6.3 for a general description of the session service that applies to any managing system and managed system. This clause describes in more detail the major example where the managing system is an NMS and the managed system is an EMS. + +A session between a managing system (NMS) and a managed system (EMS) consists of a pair of mutually associated session objects, an *NMS session* that is instantiated at the NMS and an *EMS session* that is instantiated at the EMS on request from the NMS. To enable such requests, the EMS registers an *EMS session factory* with the naming service, which then serves as the unique entry point to the EMS for all NMSs. The NMS invokes the `getEmsSession` operation of the EMS session factory using the NMS session and authentication data (user name and password) as input parameters, and the EMS returns the associated EMS session. The inheritance and containment relationships of these CORBA interfaces are shown in Figure 7 below. + +![UML class diagram showing session service interfaces and common interface relationships. Version_I, NmsSession_I (at NMS), Session_I, and EventChannel all inherit from EmsSession_I. User name & password, NmsSession_I (at NMS), and Common_I are contained within EmsSession_I as operation parameters.](f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg) + +``` + +classDiagram + class Version_I + class EmsSessionFactory_I + class EmsSession_I + class NmsSession_I_at_NMS["NmsSession_I (at NMS)"] + class Session_I + class EventChannel + class Common_I + class UserPassword["user name & password"] + + Version_I <|-- EmsSessionFactory_I + NmsSession_I_at_NMS <|-- EmsSessionFactory_I + EmsSessionFactory_I <|-- EmsSession_I + Session_I <|-- EmsSession_I + EventChannel <|-- EmsSession_I + Common_I <|-- EmsSession_I + UserPassword o-- EmsSessionFactory_I + NmsSession_I_at_NMS o-- EmsSessionFactory_I + EmsSession_I o-- Common_I + +``` + +← inheritance      ◇ containment (as an operation parameter) + +UML class diagram showing session service interfaces and common interface relationships. Version\_I, NmsSession\_I (at NMS), Session\_I, and EventChannel all inherit from EmsSession\_I. User name & password, NmsSession\_I (at NMS), and Common\_I are contained within EmsSession\_I as operation parameters. + +**Figure 7 – Session service interfaces and common interface** + +Each manager interface (i.e., managing object class) that is supported by the EMS inherits from the *Common* interface and is instantiated as *singleton*. Refer to the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for details. An EMS session provides operations to: + +- query the names of the supported manager interfaces; +- retrieve the IOR of each supported manager in order to gain access to it without using the naming service; +- retrieve the IOR of the (session-specific) event channel to be used by the NMS. + +The session service also includes an extensible security model for client authentication to the server, a versioning concept, a kind of heartbeat service, a capability model that allows to check at run time the availability of managers and their operations, and vendor-specific extensibility of session capabilities through extensions of the EMS session or NMS session interfaces. Refer to clause 9.1 for a detailed description of the session service requirements. + +### 7.2.4 OMG CORBA services and CORBA security + +The service-oriented framework is dedicated to identifying lightweight usage options of the ORB and certain CORBA services in support of CORBA-based service-oriented TMN interfaces. These CORBA services include all services considered by the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks. Clause 6 summarizes lightweight design considerations for the naming, notification/event and telecom log services [17], [19] and [20], which are detailed in clause 8. Clause 8 also states prioritized usage recommendations for the transaction and security services [37] and [38], which do not require specific design considerations. They are not shown in Figure 3 since their use is entirely optional. + +These services can be applied only to CORBA objects, and so they only affect façade objects in case of coarse-grained or service-oriented TMN interfaces where managed objects are protected indirectly through façade protection and transaction capabilities for them would be defined through façades (which act as resource managers). CORBA's rich transaction and security capabilities should be prioritized according to resulting complexity, and clauses 8.5 and 8.6 provide such recommendations on lightweight use of these services, in particular additional use of the concurrency control service (CCS) and the wider scope of CORBA security beyond the current security service capabilities. + +For example, the security issue of the notification service mentioned in clause 6.5 (see also section 6.3 of [24]) is solved by requiring that managing systems cannot access event channel factories (see 8.3/NOTIF-2) and transactional event transmission by the notification service is considered very heavyweight (see 8.5/TRANS-1). The lightweight security capabilities of the ITU-T session service (see 9.1.2.5/SESSION-7) are complementary to CORBA security. + +### 7.2.5 ITU-T support services + +Figure 3 does not show any of the ITU-T support services of ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1 (i.e., factory finder, channel finder, terminator, basic MOO, advanced MOO, heartbeat and containment service) since the use of all of these services can be completely optional on real service-oriented TMN interfaces due to the availability of other, more lightweight options. + +Similar to the naming service's *NamingContext* interface, which can create further contexts, SO façades could act themselves as factories for their interface type if needed. They can also act as factories for their allocated managed object classes if it is required that the managing system can instantiate such MOCs (see also clause 8.4/X.780.1). Therefore, factories and the *Factory Finder Service* are not needed for the SO framework. Similarly the *Terminator Service* is not needed. + +The SO framework recommends using as few event channels as possible. If the managed system implements a session service, each session has a dedicated unique event channel that is provided to the managing system through the associated server session object. If no session service is available, the event channels are registered with the naming service at prescribed locations close to the Initial naming context instead of registering a *Channel Finder Service* at each local root naming context (see clause 6.4.3). Therefore the channel finder service is not needed. + +The *Heartbeat Service* is optional for the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks. The session service of the SO framework offers a kind of heartbeat service that could be extended with heartbeat notifications and heartbeat period operations if need be (see clause 9.1.1). + +The SO framework allows for the SO façade objects as storage locations of managed object names and containment relationships. This option is a very lightweight means of name administration, which adds an element of federation and eliminates the threat for performance issues with the *Containment Service*. The SO framework federates the administration of names and containments across multiple SO façades instead of maintaining a central service that is a potential bottleneck. The containment service is basically a kind of naming service, which is well-known for bad performance when umpteen millions of managed objects are present. Therefore, the Containment Service is not needed, and not recommended, for the service-oriented framework. + +Since the telecom industry has invested a great deal of effort in the development of information models for the CMIP network management protocol, a primary goal of the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks is the reuse of CMIP models by enabling their translation to CORBA IDL with very little change in semantics. Major examples of such reuse are the *Basic MOO Service*, which provides a scoped get operation, and the *Advanced MOO Service*, which provides in addition a scoped update operation and a scoped delete operation. Here "scope" refers to containment up to a specified level (and therefore covers managed objects from different MOCs), and all scoped operations provide filtering and attribute selection options. By contrast the get, update and delete capabilities for SO managed objects do not adhere to the CMIP paradigm but follow an efficient lightweight approach. Refer to clauses 6.4, 6.7 and 9.3 of the companion ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 for details. + +## 7.3 Relationships between service-oriented, coarse-grained and fine-grained frameworks + +Clause 6.7 describes that a coarse-grained design can always be considered a service-oriented design. Clause 7/Q.816.1 describes how the fine-grained framework is extended by the constituents of the coarse-grained framework, and depicts this relationship in Figure 3/Q.816.1. This clause provides a similar figure that depicts how the artefacts of the service-oriented framework, as shown in Figure 3 above, map to the constituents of the coarse-grained and fine-grained frameworks, as shown in Figure 3/Q.816.1. + +Figure 8 below shows the constituents of all three frameworks for CORBA-based TMN interfaces: fine-grained parts are shown **in black**, coarse-grained parts are shown **in blue**, and service-oriented parts are shown **in green**. The figure shows dotted lines drawn around groupings of framework + +constituents, inheritance relationships, and the specific service-oriented artefacts. The following constituent groups and further framework components are depicted: + +- **Services (CBTS Q.816, CCBTS Q.816.1, SOCBTS Q.816.2):** protocol requirements, CORBA common object service (COS) usage requirements, and TMN-specific support services for basic capabilities of managed systems, including support of coarse-grained and SO interfaces, regardless of the type of network technology being managed. +- **Superclasses (GDCMO X.780, GDCCMO X.780.1, GDSOCMO X.780.2):** + - root class `itut_x780::ManagedObject` from which all managed objects inherit core capabilities they shall implement to get enabled for operation within the framework; + - generic managed object factory interface `itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory` from which all MO factories should inherit to be able to operate within the framework; + - root class `itut_x780::ManagedObject_F` from which all X.780.1 façades inherit basic capabilities they shall support for operation within the framework; + - common attributes `common::Common_T` lightly inherited by all service-oriented managed object classes (name, user label, owner, native EMS name, additional info parameters); + - an abstract common façade `common::Common_I` for the management of common attributes and individual capabilities from which all service-oriented façades shall inherit. +- **Inheritance relationships:** **black**, **blue** and **green** arrows indicate inheritance relationships of IDL interfaces or valuetypes, or light inheritances of IDL structs, from the respective (abstract) superclass. +- **Conventions (GDCMO X.780, GDCCMO X.780.1, GDSOCMO X.780.2):** rules and conventions for defining application-specific managed object classes and façades; GDCMO translates GDMO/ASN.1 (X.721/X.722) to IDL, which is particularly important for the basic and advanced MOO services, and GDCCMO merely extends GDCMO so that the fine-grained approach becomes a mandatory prerequisite of the coarse-grained approach; GDSOCMO does not use the "GDMO to IDL" rules but defines service-oriented conventions for "Standard Data Types" and "Notification Specifications" as well as service-oriented "Other Conventions", which introduce lightweight and multi-technology principles to the framework. +- **Application-specific objects (ITU-T Recs M.3120, M.3170.3, etc.):** + - **ITU-T Rec. M.3120:** catalogue of generic MOCs and façade interfaces at NE and network level that lacks traits specific to any particular network technology but defines common concepts by mainly translating them from M.3100; some MOCs (e.g., ME, equipment shelf, circuit pack) can be used without further specialization, other MOCs (e.g., link, network, connection, TP) are abstract classes and must be specialized with traits specific to a particular network technology (e.g., ATM, DSL, BPON) before inclusion in a commercial interface specification. + - **ITU-T Rec. M.3170.3:** MTNM adds MOCs and service-oriented façade interfaces, each derived from the respective X.780.2 superclass; while M.3120's NE and network MOCs and façades are generic and mostly network-technology agnostic, M.3170.3's MOCs and façades are multi-technology aware and capable (see clause 8.4/X.780.2), including an extension mechanism to add vendor-specific technologies and details (see clause 10.5/X.780.2), and they support all network technologies specified by the respective MTNM version in a unified way. + - **Multi-technology nature of the service-oriented framework:** the SO framework removes the tiresome restriction to single-layer networks within TMN interface + +specifications of the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks community by adding architectural elements that encompass multiple adjacent G.805/G.809 layer networks (see clause 8.4/X.780.2); such multi-layer NE and network views avoid modelling of different managed entities for each layer network and allow for the unified multi-technology management of NEs and networks. + +- Service-oriented interface design principles (SOBTS Q.816.2, GDSOCMO X.780.2):** + SOBTS and GDSOCMO include service-oriented interface design considerations that specify the lightweight use of CORBA-based services and IDL constructs; this is indicated in the figure by block arrows and ovals with a fill effect; **block arrows** indicate the transition from a coarse-grained design to a service-oriented design, and **ovals with a fill effect** indicate the service-oriented usage of services and conventions. + +![Figure 8 – Relationship of service-oriented and coarse-grained frameworks. This diagram illustrates the mapping between coarse-grained and service-oriented frameworks within a CORBA 2.x ORB environment. It is divided into several functional areas: Conventions (Standard data types, Notification specifications, Other conventions, GDMO to IDL), Superclasses (Managed object façade, SO façade, Service-oriented managed object), Services (MOO services, Channel finder, Factory finder, Terminator service, Heatbeat service), and Application-specific objects (Network façade, Link façade, Connection façade, Managed element façade). Relationships are shown through inheritance (fine-grained, coarse-grained, service-oriented), management, and usage of services. A legend at the bottom left defines the arrow types: Fine-grained inheritance (black), Coarse-grained inheritance (blue), Service-oriented inheritance (green), Increase of lightweight object (curved green), and Service-oriented usage (oval with fill).](02bb4edc0dbdf4f0749ffd3e0ea2805c_img.jpg) + +Figure 8 – Relationship of service-oriented and coarse-grained frameworks. This diagram illustrates the mapping between coarse-grained and service-oriented frameworks within a CORBA 2.x ORB environment. It is divided into several functional areas: Conventions (Standard data types, Notification specifications, Other conventions, GDMO to IDL), Superclasses (Managed object façade, SO façade, Service-oriented managed object), Services (MOO services, Channel finder, Factory finder, Terminator service, Heatbeat service), and Application-specific objects (Network façade, Link façade, Connection façade, Managed element façade). Relationships are shown through inheritance (fine-grained, coarse-grained, service-oriented), management, and usage of services. A legend at the bottom left defines the arrow types: Fine-grained inheritance (black), Coarse-grained inheritance (blue), Service-oriented inheritance (green), Increase of lightweight object (curved green), and Service-oriented usage (oval with fill). + +Figure 8 – Relationship of service-oriented and coarse-grained frameworks + +The flexibility of the service-oriented interface design principles allows mapping of the service-oriented framework to other CORBA design approaches chosen by the telecom industry, notably the *MTNM model* of TM Forum's MTNM Team and the *IRP model* of 3GPP's OAM&P working group SA5. These model mappings are out of scope of the CORBA framework but are an essential part of the proof of TMN conformance according to ITU-T Rec. M.3010 for these models. In case of MTNM, this proof is carried out in ITU-T Rec. M.3170.3: "MTNM – CORBA IDL solution set (TMF814) with implementation statement templates and guidelines (TMF814A)". + +# 8 Framework ORB and common object services usage requirements for supporting service-oriented interfaces + +ITU-T Rec. Q.816 describes how the original framework includes several of the OMG's common object services. These are services defined by the OMG for use in generally any CORBA application. The (fine-grained) framework defines which of the OMG's common object services + +shall be supported by a managed (or managing) system, and conventions on their use. ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 provides additional conventions and requirements needed to support coarse-grained interfaces for each common object service (COS) in the framework. This clause provides further conventions and requirements needed to support service-oriented interfaces for each COS in the framework. It also provides conventions on the use of certain ORB capabilities including CORBA messaging, which is considered an ORB capability set and not a COS. + +## 8.1 ORB usage requirements + +The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks do not state explicit ORB usage requirements, neither regarding the IDL repertoire nor regarding the basic system services, but do require support of ORB v2.3.1 (see clause 8.1.2/Q.816) since support of the POA and value types are considered important (see clause 5.2/Q.816). The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks also include some optional requirements on CORBA messaging (see clause 6.4/Q.816). Considering the importance of dynamic and asynchronous capabilities for the SOA paradigm and the need to enable lightweight designs, the service-oriented framework breaks down the basic ORB capabilities, including CORBA messaging, into mandatory requirements and prioritized optional requirements. + +**(R) ORB-1** An operations system shall support CORBA 2.2 [12] and use the *Portable Object Adapter* [30] as defined by the *Minimum CORBA* specification [32]. + +**(O) ORB-2** An operations system may use dynamic mode of POA operation and other dynamic aspects of CORBA omitted by the *Minimum CORBA* specification [32]. + +**(O) ORB-3** An operations system may support value types as defined by the *Objects By Value* specification [31]. This requires support of CORBA 2.3.1 [13]. + +**(O) ORB-4** As a rule, an operations system shall use only IDL interfaces that are synchronous. In exceptional and provisional cases, an operations system may use one-way operations with application-specific callback objects, and in these cases a synchronization policy as defined by the *CORBA Messaging* specification [33] should be implemented. + +**(O) ORB-5** An operations system may use transient asynchronous requests as defined by the *Asynchronous Messaging Invocation* (AMI) specification [33] and further detailed in clause 6.4/Q.816. This requires support of CORBA 2.4.2 [14]. + +**(O) ORB-6** An operations system may use persistent asynchronous requests as defined by the *Time-Independent Invocation* (TII) specification [33]. This requires support of CORBA 2.4 [14]. + +NOTE – ORB usage requirements regarding the IDL repertoire and modelling beyond **ORB-3**, e.g., the alternative ways of MOC specification outlined in clause 6.2.2, are stated in ITU-T Rec. X.780.2. + +## 8.2 Naming service + +The fine-grained framework uses CORBA names and the naming service to define unique distinguished names (DNs) and store containment relationships between managed objects, introduces one or more *local root naming contexts* besides the initial naming context, assigns a CORBA name to each local root naming context to achieve globally unique names per managed system, defines an LDAP DN string translation for (compound) CORBA names that complements the stringification capabilities of the (heavyweight) naming service, and specifies a naming service profile (see clause 6.1/Q.816, Q.816/Amd.2, and clause C.1 of Q.816/Amd.1). The coarse-grained framework adds naming rules for façades (see clause 8.1/Q.816.1). + +The service-oriented framework adds the options to consider most parts of the lightweight naming service, to define lightweight naming trees, and even to adopt a minimalistic use of the naming service. This very lightweight use of the naming service is defined by the requirements below and called *Service-Oriented Naming Service*. + +### 8.2.1 Names of managed objects and service-oriented façade objects + +Service-oriented managed objects are identified by distinguished names whose structure is identical with the structure of CORBA names (see clause 8.5/X.780.2) but these names are not stored in a naming service since SO managed objects do not possess an IOR. Service-oriented façades always possess an IOR but whether they also have a name, which then is stored in a naming service, or do not have a name depends on the implementation of the session service by the managed system. If the session service is available, only server session factories are registered with the naming service, and server session objects then provide access to service-oriented façades and event channels. If the session service is not available, every service-oriented façade and event channel is registered with the naming service at the same locations where server session factories would be located. + +### 8.2.2 Naming service usage requirements for SO interfaces + +This clause defines the naming service-related requirements operations systems must meet when using service-oriented interfaces. + +**(R) NAME-1** An operations system shall use only the lightweight naming service capabilities [16] and [17] except that the `list` operation shall also be available for use. In case of reasonably small naming trees, it should generally be possible to list any naming context without using a binding iterator. It may also be required that the `NamingContextExt` interface is available for use. + +**(O) NAME-2** An operations system shall construct and/or use a lightweight naming tree, which has only one local root naming context, namely the initial naming context, and uses only the kinds of name components specified in clause 6.4.3, and only in the specified hierarchical order. This usage includes a multi-vendor capability, a versioning capability, an OS dependency capability, and naming rules for server session factories and service-oriented façades as well as event channels. + +## 8.3 Notification service + +The notification service [19], which enhances the brilliant but limited event service [18], allows for decoupled communications between managed systems and managing systems, according to the publish-subscribe pattern, and offers a rich set of powerful capabilities that are briefly summarized in clause 6.5. The fine-grained framework recommends and prioritizes a number of these capabilities and specifies how the managed system shall use them to communicate notifications of CORBA managed objects to managing systems including the definition of all notification details. The coarse-grained framework recommends the same usage of the notification service to convey notifications from IDL-defined managed objects that are accessible through a CORBA façade. + +The service-oriented framework recommends a similar usage but with a stronger emphasis of the lightweight features, and adds further lightweight options. This clause presents the notification service requirements of the fine-grained, coarse-grained and service-oriented frameworks in a unified manner. It specifies formal mandatory and optional requirements "**(R) NOTIF-x**" and "**(O) NOTIF-x**", which refer as appropriate to the corrected requirements "**(R) NOTIF-x**" of clause 6.2/Q.816, clause 6.2 of ITU-T Q.816/Cor.1, and clause 6.2 of ITU-T Q.816/Cor.2. + +**(R) NOTIF-1** An operations system shall use a notification service, which is conformant with the OMG specification (see section 1.2 of [19]), except only for the support of the interfaces for the pull model. A managed system shall act as a push supplier to convey notifications from fine-grained or coarse-grained or service-oriented managed objects to managing systems. + +NOTE 1 – This **NOTIF-1** requirement includes **NOTIF-1/Q.816** and **NOTIF-11/Q.816**. It does not include the condition "When the OMG Notification Service is used as the Notification Service", of **NOTIF-11** of ITU-T Q.816/Cor.1, since notification service usage requirements cannot encompass the non-usage of the notification service. The non-usage option is part of the relevant conformance point (see clause 10.2.1). + +NOTE 2 – While **NOTIF-1** requires support of most interfaces of the notification service, not all operations of an interface need be implemented but some could raise the standard exception `NO_IMPLEMENT`, and this behaviour could depend on the credentials of the client on a per-interface or per-operation basis. + +NOTE 3 – Restriction of access to the `CosNotifyChannelAdmin::EventChannelFactory` interface for individual operations systems is implementation-defined (see clause 7.2.4 and **NOTIF-2**). + +NOTE 4 – Interfaces, operations, attributes and constants, which are mandatorily or optionally required for use by the managing system, have been collected in clauses C.2 and C.3 of Q.816/Amd.1 as *OMG Notification Service profile* and *OMG Event Service profile*. Capabilities that are required for use by the managed system (e.g., `CosNotifyComm::StructuredPushConsumer::push_structured_event()`, `CosNotifyComm::NotifyPublish::offer_change()`) are not listed in these annexes. + +**(R) NOTIF-2** A managed system shall instantiate one or more notification channels (i.e., instances of `CosNotifyChannelAdmin::EventChannel` [19], or – in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces – of `CosTypedNotifyChannelAdmin::TypedEventChannel` [19], or of notification log interfaces (see clause 8.4)). It may use any notification channel together with an instance of the `NotificationIRPSystem::NotificationIRP` interface defined by 3GPP [24] or an instance of the `EmsSession::EmsSession_I` interface (see clause 9.1.2.2). A managing system shall not have access to notification channel factories (nor to notification log factories). + +NOTE 5 – This **NOTIF-2** requirement includes **NOTIF-2/Q.816**. + +**(R) NOTIF-3** If the channel finder service is available (e.g., in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces), each notification channel shall be registered with this service. If the session service is available, each session shall have its unique notification channel (see clause 9.1.2.2). Otherwise, each notification channel shall be registered with the naming service (see, for example, clause 6.4.3). The managed system may restrict the use of an individual notification channel, without using event filtering capabilities, to certain event types or to certain managed object classes. + +NOTE 6 – This **NOTIF-3** requirement includes **NOTIF-3/Q.816**. + +**(R) NOTIF-4** The notification service shall support either structured events or structured and typed events. The managed system, however, must supply either only structured notifications or only typed notifications, irrespective of the notification channel used. The use of event batches (i.e., sequences of structured events) is optional. Generic events (i.e., `Anys`) must not be used. In case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, typed events are the preferred choice, and all necessary prerequisites for using typed events and translating between typed and structured events are provided (see [ITU-T Q.816] for details). In case of service-oriented interfaces, structured events are the preferred choice. The overall structure and contents of structured events is described in **NOTIF-10** with further details being added by ITU-T Recs Q.816 and X.780 in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, and ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 in case of service-oriented interfaces. + +NOTE 7 – This **NOTIF-4** requirement includes **NOTIF-4/Q.816** and **NOTIF-6/Q.816**, as corrected by ITU-T Q.816/Cor.2, as well as **NOTIF-5/Q.816**. + +**(R) NOTIF-5** Conformance with the OMG notification service specification [19] includes support of the interfaces defined in the CORBA module `CosNotifyFilter` and support of the *default Notification Service constraint language*, i.e., support for event filtering with filter objects, and mapping filter objects, that encapsulate constraints expressed in the default filtering constraint grammar and determine whether events are to be forwarded. An operations system shall use such filter objects to the extent supported by the deployed notification service (i.e., creating and destroying filters, writing filter constraints based on event structure and content, configuring filter constraints and callbacks, adding filters to and removing filters from Proxy and Admin objects). Use of mapping filter objects, which affect QoS and Admin properties of events, is optional. + +NOTE 8 – This **NOTIF-5** requirement includes **NOTIF-8/Q.816**, as corrected by ITU-T Rec. Q.816/Cor.1. + +NOTE 9 – The scoped operations of the basic and advanced MOO services to be used for fine-grained and coarse-grained TMN interfaces (see clause 7.4/Q.816 and clause 9.4/Q.816.1) provide filtering and attribute selection options that are specified with the *MOO Service constraint language* (see clause 7.4.2/Q.816). This language is defined as an extension of the default notification service constraint grammar defined by [19]. + +**(O) NOTIF-6** Conformance with the OMG notification service specification [19] includes optional support of the interfaces defined in the CORBA modules `CosNotifyCommAck` and `CosNotifyChannelAdminAck`, i.e., support for event acknowledgement based on sequence numbers that allows for reliable event delivery. It is recommended that the managed system uses these capabilities to the extent supported by the deployed notification service. + +**(R) NOTIF-7** An OS shall use all components of the QoS model of the notification service (see sections 2.5 and 3.7 of [19]). While an OMG notification service is expected to understand all standard QoS properties (see CORBA modules `CosNotification` and `CosNotifyCommAck`), it does not need to implement the full range of QoS that these properties are capable of representing. However, the fine-grained, coarse-grained and service-oriented choices of the CORBA-based TMN interface framework *require* the implementation **(R)** of certain QoS properties and *recommend* the optional implementation **(O)** of certain other QoS properties according to Table 1. + +**Table 1 – Standard QoS properties capabilities** + +| QoS property | Potential values | Implementation | Comment, condition(s) | +|-----------------------|--------------------------|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ConnectionReliability | Persistent | R | Refer to 2.5.5.1/[19], or NOTIF-9/Q.816 , for the semantics of the required and recommended reliability settings. In case of service-oriented interfaces, both settings are recommended as needed. In case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, EventReliability=BestEffort requires additional support of Q.821.1-defined alarm synchronization [5], i.e., support of the interfaces EnhancedCurrentAlarmSummaryControl[_F] . | +| | BestEffort | | | +| EventReliability | Persistent | O | | +| | BestEffort | | | +| Priority | short | | All notifications shall have the default priority 0 to avoid ordering problems. Consumers may use mapping filters to override the default setting as needed. | +| | LowestPriority | | | +| | DefaultPriority | R | | +| | HighestPriority | | | +| StopTimeSupported | FALSE | O | It is recommended to not use absolute expiry times (on a per-message basis) after which the event can be discarded. | +| | TRUE | | | +| StopTime | TimeBase::UtcT | | | +| Timeout | TimeBase::TimeT | | TimeT is an unsigned long long with unit 100 nanoseconds. The relative expiry time zero would indicate that there is no timeout. However, for alarms and TCAs 30 min is recommended, and for all other notification types 24 h . | +| | 0 (digit zero) | | | +| | $18 \cdot 10^9$ (30 min) | O | | +| | $864 \cdot 10^9$ (24 h) | O | | +| StartTimeSupported | FALSE | O | It is recommended to not use earliest delivery times (on a per-message basis). | +| | TRUE | | | +| StartTime | TimeBase::UtcT | | | +| MaxEventsPerConsumer | long | | The default setting means that no limits are imposed on the maximum number of events that may be queued for consumers. | +| | 0 (default) | | | + +**Table 1 – Standard QoS properties capabilities** + +| QoS property | Potential values | Implementation | Comment, condition(s) | +|---------------------|--------------------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OrderPolicy | AnyOrder | | It shall be possible to deliver events in the order of their arrival. In case of fine-grained or coarse-grained interfaces, events may also be buffered in (consumer-defined) priority order and delivered accordingly, in which case events from the same managed object shall have the same priority, and correlated notifications [8] must not be in use. | +| | FifoOrder | R | | +| | PriorityOrder | O | | +| | DeadlineOrder | | | +| DiscardPolicy | AnyOrder (default) | | It shall be possible to discard events, in case of a buffer overflow, in the order of their arrival. It is recommended to ensure that this cannot happen on a per-channel basis, however, by setting the Admin property RejectNewEvents to TRUE (see NOTIF-8 ). | +| | FifoOrder | R | | +| | PriorityOrder | | | +| | DeadlineOrder | | | +| | LifoOrder | | | +| MaximumBatchSize | long | | The default settings mean that event batches are not supported. If the option to support event batches is required (see NOTIF-4 ), these QoS properties must be set as needed (see, for example, [24][25]). | +| | 1 (default) | O | | +| PacingInterval | TimeBase::TimeT | | | +| | 0 (default) | O | | +| DeliveryReliability | None | | The OS should consider configuring reliable event delivery using event acknowledgement with sequence numbers, if the notification service supports it (see NOTIF-6 ). See also clause 8.7.5.3/ X.780.2 with regard to event identifiers. | +| | Acknowledgement | O | | +| RetryInterval | TimeBase::TimeT | O | | +| Retries | long | O | | + +NOTE 10 – This **NOTIF-7** requirement includes **NOTIF-9/Q.816** and **NOTIF-10/Q.816**, as corrected by ITU-T Rec. Q.816/Cor.1. It complies with the 3GPP specification [24] and [25] and the MTNM specification [28]. + +**(O) NOTIF-8** While support of the `CosNotification::AdminPropertiesAdmin` interface by the notification service is required for the configuration of channel administration policies, its use by operations systems for the standard Admin properties `MaxQueueLength`, `MaxConsumers`, `MaxSuppliers`, and `RejectNewEvents` is optional, the default values of the properties being implementation-defined. It is recommended to set `RejectNewEvents` to TRUE though. + +NOTE 11 – This **NOTIF-8** requirement complies with ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1, the 3GPP specification [24] and [25], and the MTNM specification [28]. + +**(O) NOTIF-9** An operations system may support an on-demand pull model for synchronization purposes in addition to the push model (which is triggered by the managed system whenever events originate). It is recommended that the pull mechanisms for event batches and typed events are combined and iterators be used to define highly efficient pull operations per event type with filtering capabilities, which are implemented by the managed system without event channels. + +**(R) NOTIF-10** Operations systems in the role of a supplier or a consumer of structured events shall follow the rules shown in Table 2 below for constructing and receiving structured events. Refer to the following standards for further details: + +- Sections 2.1.4, 2.2, 3.1.1 and 3.7 of [19] – *in the general case*; +- **NOTIF-7/Q.816**, the comments of the IDL interface `itut_x780::Notifications` of ITU-T Rec. X.780, and [24], [25] and [26] – *in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces*; +- Clause 8.7/X.780.2, the comments of the IDL module `notifications` of ITU-T Rec. X.780.2, and [24], [25], [26] and [28] – *in case of service-oriented interfaces*. + +NOTE 12 – Sections 2.2, 3.1.1, 3.7 and Appendix B of [19] contain the *normative* specification of the syntax and semantics of OMG structured events. + +**Table 2 – Frameworks mappings of notifications to structured events** + +| Field name | Actual field type | Potential field values | Comment | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Fixed event header | | | | +| event_type | CosNotification::EventType | see Comment | The service-oriented framework extends OMG's and Q.816's understanding of Domains and Event types (Note 1). The values of the type_name field depend on the value of the domain_name field (Note 2). | +| domain_name | string | "telecommunications" [8] or OS-OS interface class (e.g., IRP document version number string [24], [25] and [26], "tmf_mtnm" [27] and [28]) | | +| type_name | string | see Comment | | +| event_name | string | " " | This field does not have a standardized semantics. It could uniquely identify the specific event instance being transmitted, or be used for OS-OS interface class-specific purposes (see, for example, [26]), or be used for vendor-specific purposes. For reasons of interoperability, it is recommended to ignore it. | +| Variable event header (a list of zero or more name/value pairs, initially with any values) | | | | +| EventReliability | short | see Table 1 | The OMG defines the standard optional header fields listed here for QoS properties configuration at event level (see section 2.2 of [19]). The recommendations for using these QoS properties given in Table 1 apply likewise. | +| Priority | short | see Table 1 | | +| StopTime | TimeBase::UtcT | see Table 1 | | +| Timeout | TimeBase::TimeT | see Table 1 | | +| StartTime | TimeBase::UtcT | see Table 1 | | +| SequenceNumber | long | see NOTIF-6 and section 3.7 of [19] | | +| ohf_name | any | ohf_value | generic optional header field : indicates further optional fields | + +**Table 2 – Frameworks mappings of notifications to structured events** + +| Field name | Actual field type | Potential field values | Comment | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Filterable event body (a sequence of name/value pairs, initially with any values) | | | | +| see Comment | see Comment | see Comment | The potential contents of the filterable event body depends on the event_type (Note 3). | +| fd_name | any | fd_value | generic filterable data field: indicates further optional fields | +| Remaining event body (additional event data, initially an Any) | | | | +| remainder_of_body | any, or an overlay structure, or an MOC (see Comment) | NULL, or an overlay, or a managed object (see Comment) | Actual type and value of this field depend on the value of event_type (Note 4). | + +NOTE 1 – The OMG specifies *domain\_name* as an identifier for the vertical industry domain within which the type of event that characterizes a given structured event is defined. ITU-T Recs Q.816 and X.780 adopt the OMG example "telecommunications" for the event types of the fine-grained and coarse-grained framework (see IDL interface *itut\_x780::Notifications* [8]). The service-oriented framework takes into consideration that there need not be a unique CORBA specification (set) for a given vertical industry domain if the domain has a broader scope. For example, in the telecommunications industry there are standard CORBA specifications for fixed networks, namely **TMF MTNM**, and mobile networks, namely **the 3GPP IRPs**. So the semantics of *domain\_name* is extended to include OS-OS interface classes that are specified in CORBA IDL. For example, "tmf\_mtnm" identifies TMF MTNM [27] and [28], and IRP document version number strings, or **IRPVersions** for short, identify 3GPP IRPs [24], [25] and [26]. + +NOTE 2 – The potential values of *type\_name* are defined in the CORBA specification that is identified by *domain\_name*. In case of "telecommunications", the event type name is the scoped name of the operation defining the event. The interface *Notifications* of X.780 defines 15 such operations, and a constant for each scoped operation name, e.g., `const string attributeValueChangeTypeName = "itut_x780::Notifications::attributeValueChange";`. In case of "tmf\_mtnm", the event type name is one of 13 standard string literals documented in [28] and formally defined in the IDL module *notifications* of ITU-T X.780.2, e.g., `const string NT_OBJECT_CREATION = "NT_OBJECT_CREATION";`. In case of an IRPVersion (e.g., "32.111-3 V6.5"), the document identified by this IRPVersion will specify an interface *NotificationType* that defines standard string literals for the event type names, e.g., `const string NOTIFY_FM_NEW_ALARM = "x1";`. + +NOTE 3 – The mandatory and optional NV pairs of the filterable event body depend on *event\_type*. In case of *domain\_name* = "telecommunications", *itut\_x780::Notifications* and **NOTIF-7/Q.816** specify rules for translating each parameter of the event-defining operation into a name/value pair. Optional parameters are either excluded or have a NULL value if not supported. These rules comply with OMG's rules for translating typed events into structured events (2.1.4/[19]). In case of *domain\_name* = "tmf\_mtnm", [28] specifies for each event type all name/value pairs explicitly together with the actual field types. In case of *domain\_name* = (e.g., = "32.111-3 V6.5"), the document identified by this IRPVersion will specify for each event type all name/value pairs explicitly. + +NOTE 4 – The actual type and value of the remaining event body depend on *event\_type*. In case of *domain\_name* = "telecommunications", **NOTIF-7/Q.816** states that *remainder\_of\_body* shall be NULL. In case of *domain\_name* = , [24] defines for *remainder\_of\_body* the overlay structure *NotificationIRPNotifications::NonFilterableEventBody* consisting of a sequence of name/value pairs, which are explicitly considered non-filterable, and the remainder of the remainder, and the document identified by IRPVersion may specify such non-filterable name/value pairs. In case of *domain\_name* = "tmf\_mtnm", [28] states that *remainder\_of\_body* shall be NULL except for object creation notifications (OCNs) in which case the actual type depends on the value of the filterable *objectType* field of the OCN and shall be the corresponding IDL struct defining the MOC identified by *objectType*. The service-oriented framework recommends this approach (see clause 8.7/X.780.2). + +NOTE 13 – This **NOTIF-10** requirement includes **NOTIF-7/Q.816**. + +## 8.4 Telecom log service + +The telecom log service [20] enhances the notification service [19] by providing log objects that allow to turn events, which pass filtering constraints, into log records and to store these records persistently. Logs and log managers offer further capabilities according to and beyond ITU-T Rec. X.735 that are briefly summarized in clause 6.6. The fine-grained framework recommends a number of these capabilities for filtered logging of notifications of CORBA managed objects. The coarse-grained framework requires the same usage of the telecom log service for notifications generated by IDL-defined managed objects that are accessible through a CORBA façade. + +The service-oriented framework recommends almost the same usage for notifications originating from service-oriented managed objects. It adds some clarifications though and recommends a more lightweight use through the managing system with regard to logs owned by the managed system. + +**(R) LOG-1** An operations system shall use a telecom log service, which is conformant with the OMG specification (see section 1.5 of [20]). The OMG telecom log service provides a superset of the capabilities of the OMG Notification Service [19] (which in turn is an extension of the OMG event service [18]) and can therefore be used *in lieu* of the notification service. Regarding the notification service capabilities, the telecom log service shall comply with **NOTIF-1**. + +NOTE 1 – This **LOG-1** requirement includes **LOG-3/Q.816** and corresponds to **NOTIF-1**. + +NOTE 2 – Interfaces and operations, which are mandatorily or optionally required for use by the managing system, have been collected in clause C.4 of Q.816/Amd.1 as *OMG Telecom Log Service profile*. Further log capabilities that are required for use by the managed system, in particular the log creation and inherited consumer Admin object capabilities of log factories, are not listed in this annex. The service-oriented framework recommends a slightly more restrictive use of log capabilities by the managing system, however, in particular avoiding log modifications and filterings as far as at all possible (see **LOG-7**). + +**(R) LOG-2** When a telecom log service is used *in lieu* of the notification service, the logs shall be notification channels (i.e., instances of `DsNotifyLogAdmin::NotifyLog`). The support of the other types of logs and of typed log records is optional. **NOTIF-3** applies. A log record can be created from any notification originating from a fine-grained or coarse-grained or service-oriented managed object, and any notification log record can be translated back to a notification. + +NOTE 3 – This **LOG-2** requirement includes **LOG-2/Q.816** and a part of **LOG-1/Q.816**. + +**(R) LOG-3** A managed system shall instantiate one or more notification logs. It may use any notification log together with an instance of the `emsSession::EmsSession_I` interface (see 9.1.2.2) or an instance of the `NotificationLogIRPSystem::NotificationLogIRP` interface defined by 3GPP [25]. A managing system shall not have access to notification log factories. + +NOTE 4 – This **LOG-3** requirement includes another part of **LOG-1/Q.816** and corresponds to **NOTIF-2**. + +**(R) LOG-4** When the telecom log service is used *in lieu* of the notification service, it shall comply with **NOTIF-4**, **NOTIF-5**, **NOTIF-7** and **NOTIF-10**, it may comply with **NOTIF-6** and **NOTIF-8**, and the support of **NOTIF-9** is recommended as well. + +NOTE 5 – This **LOG-4** requirement includes the remaining part of **LOG-1/Q.816**. + +**(O) LOG-5** Log records store event data in the attribute `info` of IDL type `any`. Structured and typed events shall be wrapped in and unwrapped from `info` according to the rules specified in section 2.1.4 of [19] for translating the respective message formats. In particular, when a structured event is logged, the type code of `info` shall be set appropriately to indicate the IDL type `struct` with detailed description according to `CosNotification::StructuredEvent`. Log records that store event data should either have no optional attributes, i.e., the attribute `attr_list` should be empty, or the potential content of `attr_list` should be documented in detail. + +**(O) LOG-6** Log generated events are defined in the CORBA module `DsLogNotification` as structures and generated by log factories as `Anys` (i.e., untyped/generic events). When generating a log event, log factories shall set the type code of the event value appropriately to indicate the IDL type `struct` with detailed description according to the respective `struct` definition of the event. + +**(R) LOG-7** Independently of the managed system, the managing system may use log factories of its own and create/instantiate, control and manage its own logs (of any type) and their log records. In case of service-oriented interfaces, when using a notification log owned by the managed system (see **LOG-3**), the managing system shall not destroy the log, not copy the log, not set attributes of the log, not write records to the log, not delete records from the log, not modify any attribute of any log record, and not change or modify the filter object associated with the log. + +## 8.5 Concurrency control and object transaction services + +In a distributed computing environment, such as CORBA, updates from one client could possibly be overwritten by undesired updates from a concurrent client unless suitable preventive measures are taken to control the access to shared resources and to guarantee continual data consistency for all concurrent clients. For example, several (authenticated and appropriately authorized) managing systems could be clients of the same managed system with overlapping session periods. The basic mechanism for concurrency control is locking of shared resources. More advanced techniques use the transaction paradigm, which includes lock management. The notification and telecom log services provide a basis for making a client aware that its update has been overwritten but do not (and hardly could) provide a locking mechanism to prevent the occurrence of undesired overwrites. + +The fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks recommend the optional support of the OMG (object) transaction service (OTS) [37] to guarantee data consistency (see clause 6.6/Q.816 and clause 8.6/Q.816.1) but without specifying any OTS feature or any difference in usage for fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces. They also state that the OTS is designed for high reliability and incurs additional overhead, which may not be required when using a CORBA-based TMN framework. The service-oriented framework recommends a levelled and more lightweight approach to concurrency control and transaction support, if required at a CORBA-based TMN interface. + +The OMG has also specified the concurrency control service (CCS) [36], which mediates the access to CORBA objects such that the consistency of the object is not compromised when accessed by concurrent clients. The CCS may be used with or without transactions. It is rather a lock managing facility, the control of concurrent access being provided by the CCS user (e.g., the OTS, any managing system). A CCS-controlled resource, or resource manager, would be a CORBA object that creates and retains a unique lock set on which locks can be acquired, or attempted to acquire, in one of five modes (read, write, upgrade, intention read, intention write). Access to the resource, or the resources managed by the resource manager, is only possible after acquiring a lock and then only to the extent of the lock mode. If a requested lock cannot be granted due to a conflict with already existing locks, the caller will be blocked until the lock can be acquired, or the acquisition attempt will be rejected. The CCS enforces a FIFO order policy for the lock queue. + +A service-oriented façade provides a particularly efficient means for concurrency control of its allocated managed objects. Since SO managed objects are only accessible via their assigned SO façade, CCS control of the façade will also provide CCS control of all allocated managed objects. + +**(O) CONCUR-1** CORBA-based TMN interfaces (fine-grained, or coarse-grained, or service-oriented) should support the OMG concurrency control service [36] in non-transactional mode to guarantee data consistency for managed objects (and management support objects). + +**(O) CONCUR-2** If data consistency for managed objects (and management support objects) and also certain transaction capabilities are required, CORBA TMN interfaces should use the OMG CCS in transactional mode together with the simplest application programming model of the OMG object transaction service [37] (indirect context management with implicit propagation). + +NOTE 1 – The **CONCUR-1** and **CONCUR-2** requirements include **TRANS-1/Q.816**. + +For coarse-grained or service-oriented interfaces *transactional capabilities* would be defined through façade operations, i.e., these interfaces have the potentiality to define transactions involving managed objects through transactions of façades. When to which extent, and above all with which major benefit, transactional capabilities should be used at CORBA-based TMN interfaces (fine-grained, or coarse-grained, or service-oriented) is for further study. Such requirements would affect the ORB and POA usage and lead to a refinement of the considerations of clause 6.2.1. Using the OTS and an OTS-aware ORB can be quite complex. For example, the notification service considers transactional event transmission as a QoS property (see section 2.1.5 of [19]) whose enabling requires encoding of the unshared transaction model (see section 2.12 of [37]). The OTS specification [37] offers a rich feature set with two transaction models (flat and nested), four application programming models, and three conformance levels (lite, lite-distributed and full). + +**(O) TRANS-1** If transaction support is required beyond concurrency control, CORBA TMN interfaces should use an OTS, which provides the required conformance levels and features, with the most lightweight application programming model that meets the requirements. + +## 8.6 CORBAsecurity + +CORBA shields applications from the details of networking, but when dealing with CORBAsecurity it is quite useful to have a basic understanding of CORBA's inter-ORB protocols GIOP and IIOP, and of how protocol-specific and CORBA/ORB services-related information are encoded in IORs. These topics go far beyond the two aspects of CORBA treated in clauses 6.2 and 8.1, and constitute the *third aspect of CORBA* that can be important for use by the TMN frameworks: + +- **CORBA interoperability features of ORB products:** these are mainly chapter 13 "ORB Interoperability Architecture" (CORBA module *IOP*) and chapter 15 "General Inter-ORB Protocol" (CORBA modules *GIOP* and *IIOP*) of the CORBA specifications. + +Assessment of the potential lightweight use of this aspect within the scope of the CORBA-based TMN frameworks is for further study. Related considerations should start with an analysis of the IOR information model regarding tagged profiles and tagged components, and the standard IIOP components. Such analysis shall be guided by the security requirements, services and mechanisms specified in the M.3016-series ITU-T Recommendations, and would need to dive into the details of the *IOP* [44], *GIOP* [45], *IIOP* [45], *SECIO* [38], *SSLIO* [38], *CSIOP* [46] and *SECP* [50] modules in order to map M.3016 items to CORBA interoperability and security capabilities. This clause mainly clarifies and grades the approach of ITU-T Rec. Q.816, specifically with regard to the options for the transport layer that dispatches GIOP messages: TCP (with either IIOP or SECIO on top), or SSL (with IIOP on top and TCP beneath), or TLS (with TCP below and IIOP above). + +CORBAsecurity is provided by capabilities of the OMG security service [38], [39], [41] and [50] and interoperability capabilities of the ORB [42], [44], [45], [46], [47] and [48]. These capabilities encompass (and go beyond) communications security, authentication of principals (human users and objects), (role-based) authorization of access to objects by principals, security auditing, non-repudiation and security administration. Most of these basic capabilities may already be a little overkill for many applications though. Instead, applications might require, for reasons of out-of-the-box availability and simplicity, only the communications security and user/system-level authentication functionality based on transport layer security (TLS) technology [43], or its precursor secure sockets layer (SSL) 3.0 [40], or might require no security at all since they run in an already secured environment. SSL and TLS support by the ORB are optional but any optional support must comply with the CORBA specification. However, only CORBA 2.6 [21] and 3.0 [22] (and also 3.1 of [47] and [48]) are TLS-aware, i.e., support of older ORB versions means to condone SSL 3.0 (see also clause 5.2/Q.816). + +Consequently the fine-grained framework recommends three levels of security: no security, use of SSL (with or without certificate-based access control), and use of capabilities of the OMG security service as appropriate (with or without SSL). The coarse-grained framework recommends the same security approach and notes that when using the façade approach, the security service can protect at most at the level of individual façade interface instances. If there are requirements to protect managed objects at the instance level using the capabilities of the OMG security service, then a fine-grained approach should be used. The service-oriented framework recommends a similar usage but emphasizes lightweight features and prioritizes security capabilities accordingly. + +The security requirements for CORBA-based TMN interfaces (fine-grained, or coarse-grained, or service-oriented) stated below, therefore, reflect the following choices: + +- No security measures at all. +- ORBs use SSL/TLS to provide communications security and user/system-level authentication. + +NOTE 1 – This is session security since SSL/TLS operates between the session/sockets and transport/TCP layers based on cryptographic principles such as public keys, digital signatures, message digests, digital envelopes and signed certificates. A more heavyweight alternative (without user-level authentication, however) would be channel security with IPSec/IKE, which operates between the transport/TCP and network/IP layers based on packet-level cryptography and cryptographic keys per TCP connection. + +- Operations systems use the extensible ITU-T session service to protect sessions and façades (with their allocated managed objects) on a per session basis with user name and password authentication and vendor-specific security capabilities (see clauses 9.1.1 and 9.1.2.5). +- The CORBA environment supports specific security measures such as controlled access to CORBA object factories (see, for example, the notification service integrity issue described in clause 7.2.4) or CORBA-aware firewalls, which require at least CORBA 2.4 (see [42] and [14]) or, for the revised firewall traversal specification [49], [45] and [46], even CORBA 3.1 [47] and [48]. +- ORBs use SECIOp and the underlying extension SECP of GIOP to provide the security levels and features of CORBA's common secure interoperability (CSI) specification [39], [46] and [50]. +- ORBs and operations systems use the OMG security service [38] to provide and consume communications security, authentication, non-repudiation, access control lists for groups or individuals accessing objects and operations, etc., according to the CSI architecture. + +The actual level and details of security service to be provided on a CORBA-based TMN interface, and by the deployed distributed environment, is left as a matter to be negotiated between the parties supplying the managed and managing systems, and so all security requirements are optional. + +**(O) SEC-1** The CORBA environment may optionally support either IIOP/SSL or IIOP/TLS or SECIOp as defined in the OMG security service and ORB interoperability specifications. This requires support of CORBA 2.3.1 [13], or even CORBA 3.0.3 [22] in case of IIOP/TLS. + +NOTE 2 – This SEC-1 requirement includes SEC-1/Q.816. + +**(O) SEC-2** When a secure transport layer for CORBA's GIOP messages according to SEC-1 is supported, the support of authentication certificates (for clients and servers) and an associated PKI policy shall be an option left up to the administration of the CORBA environment. + +NOTE 3 – This SEC-2 requirement includes SEC-3/Q.816. + +**(O) SEC-3** An operations system may use the ITU-T session service (see clause 9.1) to protect sessions and façades together with their allocated managed objects. + +**(O) SEC-4** The distributed CORBA environment may support specific security measures such as controlled access to CORBA object factories or CORBA-aware firewalls. Firewall security requires support of CORBA 2.4.2 [14], or even CORBA 3.1 [47] and [48] for improved features. + +**(O) SEC-5** Managed systems, managing systems, and ORBs may use the OMG security service [38] to support its wide range of capabilities according to CORBA's CSI specification [39], [46] and [50]. This requires support of the appropriate CORBA revision [13], [14], [21], [22], [47] and [48]. + +NOTE 4 – This **SEC-5** requirement includes **SEC-2/Q.816**. + +**(O) SEC-6** In case of coarse-grained or service-oriented interfaces, an operations system should take into account that CORBA security can protect only at the level of individual façades, which are CORBA objects providing access to allocated IDL-defined managed objects. If there are requirements to protect managed objects at the individual instance level using CORBA security, then a fine-grained approach should be used where all managed objects have an IOR. If protection is required at the MOC level, then a coarse-grained or service-oriented approach should be used. + +# **9 Framework support services requirements for supporting service-oriented interfaces** + +In addition to rules for using the ORB and certain OMG common object services in a lightweight fashion, this Recommendation also defines one new support service for use on CORBA TMN interfaces (fine-grained, or coarse-grained, or service-oriented) to manage a client/server connection between a managing system and a managed system. The IDL describing the interfaces to this new ITU-T TMN support service is provided in Annex A. No additional requirements are defined for the ITU-T support services of ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1. + +## **9.1 Session service** + +The session service provides capabilities to establish and maintain a client/server connection between a managing system (client) and a managed system (server), which is called a session. Such a "managing system/managed system session" is incarnated by two session objects, one at the server side (server or EMS session) and one at the client side (client or NMS session). The session service is enabled through server (or EMS) session factories. + +**(R) SESSION-1** A managed system shall instantiate one or more *Server Session Factory* objects, as defined in clause 9.1.2.5. Each *Server Session Factory* instance shall be registered with the OMG naming service according to the naming rules specified in **SESSION-8**. All access to CORBA objects (e.g., service-oriented façades), except the server session factories themselves, shall be managed through objects of the session service without using the naming service. + +The session service can be used with any CORBA TMN framework paradigm (fine-grained, or coarse-grained, or service-oriented). Its use is optional for reasons of compatibility with already deployed framework implementations. It can be added to any basic conformance profile of the framework to provide an advanced conformance profile (see clause 10.2.2). The benefits of the session service are summarized in the next clause. + +### **9.1.1 Session service rationale and potentialities** + +In a general ORB architecture, a client is an entity that invokes a request on a CORBA object while a server is an entity that implements one or more CORBA objects, and so first of all the terms client and server are meaningful only within the context of a particular request because the entity that is the client for one request may be the server for another request and conversely. Therefore, a general CORBA deployment consists of a set of distributed CORBA objects that are invoked across a CORBA bus. But for reasons of efficiency usually most CORBA objects are grouped into CORBA servers, and CORBA clients implement at most callback objects. CORBA-based TMN interfaces are OS-OS interfaces as per ITU-T Rec. M.3010, where one OS is a managing system that takes a manager or CORBA client role (e.g., an NMS) and the other OS is a managed system that takes an + +agent or CORBA server role (e.g., an EMS). The session service provides basic and advanced capabilities to encapsulate and control such a client/server relationship between operations systems. + +Refer to clause 6.3 for an overview of the basic capabilities of the session service. The detection of loss of communication through a ping operation is a simple kind of heartbeat service, which can be used from either side of the client/server connection. If the server implements heartbeat notifications (see clause 6.5 and clause 8.7/X.780.2), the *Server Session* interface (see clause 9.1.2.2) could be extended by advanced operations to set and get the period between heartbeats similar to the heartbeat service of the fine-grained and coarse-grained frameworks (see 7.5/Q.816). + +The session service interfaces generally allow for vendor-specific extensibility of capabilities. For example, vendors may use the authentication mechanism by user name and password provided by the *Server Session Factory* interface to implement an authentication and access log database, which is maintained by the session service, with the option to customize sessions per user through authorization policies. This lightweight security capability would complement the use of CORBAsecurity (see clause 8.5) and should include communications security (e.g., IIOP over SSL/TLS) or at least a challenge/response scheme to avoid transmitting password information across the network. Another example would be administration of the computing resources allocated to the session including garbage collection. A third example would be implementation of the *observer* design pattern3 with server sessions as the subjects, or observables, which publish notifications through callback operations of their observers, and client sessions as the observers, which subscribe to receive notifications according to prescribed filter conditions. + +The *Server Session Factory* interface instance serves as the entry point to the server OS for all client OSes. The clients gain access to this entry point through the naming service. However, there may be several such entry points, one for each IDL version implemented by the server OS. The clients should therefore use the `getVersion` operation of the server session factory before establishing a session to ensure that this entry point will provide the wanted IDL version. + +The `getSupportedManager` and `getManager` operations of the server session interface and the `getCapabilities` operation of the common interface (see 9.3.2.7/X.780.2) provide a capability model that allows to check at run time the availability of service-oriented façades and their operations. They also enable a minimalistic use of the naming service (see clause 6.4.1). + +### 9.1.2 Session service description + +Overview descriptions of the session service's capabilities are contained in clauses 6.3, 6.4.1 and 7.2.3. The session service consists of five interfaces two of which are *virtual* (see Figure 7): + +- interface *Session\_I* (generic session); +- interface *EmsSession\_I* (server session) that inherits from *Session\_I*; +- interface *NmsSession\_I* (client session) that inherits from *Session\_I*; +- interface *Version\_I* (generic IDL versioning); +- interface *EmsSessionFactory\_I* (server session factory) that inherits from *Version\_I*. + +--- + +3 The observer design pattern [52] is a behavioural pattern with the intent to define a one-to-many dependency between objects so that when one object changes state, all its dependents are notified and updated automatically. The pattern relates a subject, or observable, to any number of dependent observers. The subject provides operations for attaching and detaching observers, and an optional operation for notifying all attached observers of state changes. The observer provides an operation for updating, or synchronizing, its state when the state of an attaching subject changes. The update of the observer could be the triggering of the pull of the state of the subject or, when used as a callback operation, could be the push of a notification from the subject according to attachment policies. + +These interfaces are described in the following clauses and defined in Annex A. They use interfaces from ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 and OMG's notification service. The IDL of Annex A therefore includes the IDL file of ITU-T Rec. X.780.2 and an OMG IDL file. + +**(R) SESSION-2** The interfaces supported by the session service objects shall be the interfaces listed above and described below. There are EMS sessions (server sessions), NMS sessions (client sessions), and EMS session factories (server session factories). + +#### 9.1.2.1 Session interface + +The *Session* interface provides an attribute that contains a reference to the associated party on the other side (i.e., either a *Client Session* object or a *Server Session* object) and operations to allow for the detection of loss of communication and a controlled disconnect between associated parties. The IDL describing the *Session* interface is provided below (without comments). + +``` +interface Session_I +{ + readonly attribute Session_I associatedSession; + + void ping(); + + oneway void endSession(); + +}; +``` + +The *associatedSession* attribute contains a reference to the *Session\_I* object on the other side (NMS/EMS) to which the object is associated. This attribute can be checked to make sure the *NmsSession\_I/EmsSession\_I* association is still valid, in particular in case of communication failures. The *ping* operation allows for the detection of loss of communication. Differentiation of intermittent problems from loss of connection is implementation-specific for the managed and managing systems. The *endSession* operation allows for a controlled disconnect between associated parties. All resources allocated for this session (at the party) are deleted by the operation. + +**(R) SESSION-3** The session service shall support the attribute and operations of the *Session* interface as described above and documented in the IDL comments. + +#### 9.1.2.2 Server session interface + +The *Server Session* interface inherits from the *Session* interface. It defines a type representing a list of names of SO façades, which are called managers, and operations to retrieve the names of the supported managers as well as the IOR of any supported manager. It also defines an operation to retrieve the IOR of the unique OMG event channel (i.e., a notification channel or a telecom log channel) that is associated with the server session. It further defines exceptions for each operation. The IDL describing the *Server Session* interface is provided below (without comments). + +``` +module emsSession +{ + typedef sequence managerNames_T; + + interface EmsSession_I : session::Session_I + { + void getSupportedManagers( + out managerNames_T supportedManagerList) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + + void getManager( + in string managerName, + out common::Common_I managerInterface) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + } +} +``` + +``` + + void getEventChannel( + out CosNotifyChannelAdmin::EventChannel eventChannel) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + + }; +} + +``` + +The *managerNames\_T* type is used to define parameters that contain a list of manager names, i.e., names of service-oriented façades, as defined by interface specifications that extend this framework and preferably derived from the IDL names of the manager CORBA interfaces that inherit from *Common\_I*. The *getSupportedManagers* operation provides the list of manager interfaces that the EMS implements. The *getManager* operation takes a manager name and provides its IOR as *Common\_I* interface (see clause 9.3/X.780.2), which the client should narrow to the right façade interface. The *getEventChannel* operation provides the IOR of the unique event channel that the EMS maintains for this server session. The event channel is in fact a notification channel as specified by the OMG notification service, i.e., an event channel as specified by the OMG event service that can have both QoS and administrative properties assigned to it. When the server (EMS) supports the OMG telecom log service, the notification channel is also a log. All operations may raise the unique exception object *ProcessingFailureException* (see clause 8.6/X.780.2) with all admissible exception types being specified as IDL comments. + +**(R) SESSION-4** The session service shall support the type and operations of the *Server Session* interface as described above and documented in the IDL comments. + +#### 9.1.2.3 Client session interface + +The *Client Session* interface inherits from the *Session* interface and is instantiated at the client as a callback object. It defines operations that are invoked from the server to inform the client in case of notification losses (events or alarms) and termination of a loss period. The IDL describing the *Client Session* interface is provided below (without comments). + +``` + +interface NmsSession_I : session::Session_I +{ + void eventLossOccurred( + in globaldefs::Time_T startTime, + in string notificationId); + + void eventLossCleared( + in globaldefs::Time_T endTime); + + void alarmLossOccurred( + in globaldefs::Time_T startTime, + in string notificationId); + +}; + +``` + +The *eventLossOccurred* operation should be called by the server (EMS) when an event loss period begins because the server fails to push events to the client (NMS) or discards events for other reasons. It takes as input the time and ID of the first notification lost. The *eventLossCleared* operation shall be called by the server to indicate that an event or alarm loss period is over, which was previously indicated by an *eventLossOccurred* or *alarmLossOccurred* operation. It takes the time of the end of the loss period as input. The *alarmLossOccurred* operation should be called by the server when a loss period begins for a notification type that is not a lifecycle event (but an alarm, a TCA, etc.) because the server discards events. It takes as input the time and ID of the first non-lifecycle event lost. Each of these callback operations must not raise any exception. + +**(R) SESSION-5** The session service shall support the callback operations of the *Client Session* interface as described above and documented in the IDL comments. + +#### 9.1.2.4 Version interface + +The *Version* interface defines an operation that allows the client (NMS) to query the current version of the IDL interface implemented by the server (EMS). The format of the return value is normative. The IDL describing the *Version* interface is provided below (without comments). + +``` +interface Version_I +{ + string getVersion(); +}; +``` + +The *getVersion* operation returns the version string of the IDL version associated with the *Server Session Factory* instance that implements the *Version* interface. Refer to the IDL comments in Annex A for the normative format of the version string. + +**(R) SESSION-6** The session service shall support the operation of the *Version* interface as described above and documented in the IDL comments. + +#### 9.1.2.5 Server session factory interface + +The *Server Session Factory* interface inherits from the *Version* interface. It defines an operation that allows the client to request instantiation of a *Server Session* object and association of this object with a *Client Session* object provided by the client. It also defines exceptions for this operation. The IDL describing the *Server Session Factory* interface is provided below (without comments). + +``` +interface EmsSessionFactory_I : idlVersion::Version_I +{ + void getEmsSession( + in string user, + in string password, + in nmsSession::NmsSession_I client, + out emsSession::EmsSession_I emsSessionInterface) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); +}; +``` + +The *getEmsSession* operation takes a user name, a password and the IOR of a previously instantiated *Client Session*, and provides the IOR of a *Server Session*, which is associated to the *Client Session*. The operation may raise the unique exception object *ProcessingFailureException* (see clause 8.6/X.780.2) with all admissible exception types being specified as IDL comments. + +**(R) SESSION-7** The session service shall support the operation of the *Server Session Factory* interface as described above and documented in the IDL comments. + +After instantiation of a *Server Session Factory* object, one object per supported IDL version, the managed system registers the instance(s) with the naming service according to the naming rules specified in **SESSION-8** and **SESSION-9**. In case of service-oriented interface design, it does not register other CORBA objects (façades) with the naming service, and so the server session factories provide the unique, version-specific entry points for clients to interact with the server. This lightweight paradigm is called "minimalistic use of Naming Service". Access to other CORBA interface instances (façade objects) is provided to clients through the *getManager* operation of the returned *Server Session* object (see clause 9.1.2.2). + +**(R) SESSION-8** A managed system shall instantiate exactly one *Server Session Factory* object per supported IDL version. Also, each Initial Naming Context shall have at least one binding for a *Server Session Factory* object. The values of the *id* strings in this binding shall simply identify the server that implements the *Server Session Factory* object. The *kind* string of the last component in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("emsSessionFactory::EmsSessionFactory\_I"). + +**(R) SESSION-9** When the CORBA naming graph is a lightweight naming tree (see **NAME-2**), the name components of a *Server Session Factory* name below the initial naming context shall have the following kinds: "Class", "Vendor", "EmsInstance", "Version", "EmsSessionFactory\_I". + +NOTE 1 – The naming rules for *Server Session Factory* objects are more general than the naming rules for ITU-T TMN support services specified in ITU-T Rec. Q.816 (see **FACTORY\_FINDER-1**, **CHANNEL\_FINDER-1**, **TERM-1**, **MOO-1**, **HEARTBEAT-1**) and ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 (see **CONTAINMENT-1**) where all support service objects are located directly under a local root naming context (e.g., the initial naming context). + +NOTE 2 – The versioning concept of having one *Server Session Factory* object per supported IDL version does not prevent the use of the versioning guidelines clause 6.13/X.780 and clause 10.5.4/X.780.2. + +## 9.2 Other ITU-T support services + +In the lightweight approach to network management with service-oriented CORBA TMN interfaces, the use of the support services of ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1 is optional for the reasons stated in clause 7.2.5. If used, no additional requirements need to be placed on the use of these support services for supporting service-oriented interfaces. + +# 10 Service-oriented compliance and conformance + +This clause defines the criteria that shall be met by other standards documents claiming compliance to the service-oriented CORBA framework and the functions of CORBA-based TMN services that shall be implemented by operations systems claiming conformance to this Recommendation. Since conformance to ITU-T Rec. Q.816.2 includes a more flexible conformance to ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1, this clause also summarizes the conformance points of ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1 in a convenient manner. + +## 10.1 Standards document compliance + +Any specification claiming compliance with the service-oriented CORBA framework shall: + +- 1) Provide a description of how its constituent documents, or document sections, and further deliverables (such as CORBA IDL files) can be split between the two aspects "information modelling in IDL" and "ORB and CORBA services usage" of CORBA-based TMN interface specification. +- 2) Support all the standards document compliance requirements related to the "information modelling in IDL" aspect as stated in ITU-T Rec. X.780.2. +- 3) Meet the following **standards document compliance criteria** related to the "ORB and CORBA services usage" aspect: + - specify a usage of the ORB, the telecom-related OMG common object services, and the ITU-T TMN support services that comply with ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 (coarse-grained interfaces) or with this Recommendation (service-oriented interfaces) (see clause 10.2.1); + - in case of coarse-grained interfaces, specify, along the lines of clauses 6.7 and 7.3, how the coarse-grained interface design can be redesigned gradually to become more and more service-oriented; + - in case of service-oriented interfaces, specify how the relevant documents, or document sections, and further deliverables (such as CORBA IDL files) are related to the clauses of this Recommendation; + +- if the specification includes IDL files that collectively define a session service according to clause 9.1, specify how the normative IDL of Annex A, including comments, can be obtained from the provided IDL files *without any syntactical changes*, + +**except** for *pragmas, module names*, and, if need be, a few minor *additional IDL constructs* that do not at all affect the constructs of Annex A, + +and *with only moderate and reasonable modifications with regard to* (ordinary or formatted) *comments* (for example, inclusion of references to additional parts of the specification that are out of scope of the service-oriented CORBA framework). + +- 4) Follow the service-oriented interface design rules defined in clause 10/X.780.2. + +## 10.2 System conformance + +This clause first summarizes the conformance points of this Recommendation, ITU-T Recs Q.816.1 and Q.816 (i.e., the requirements on usage of the ORB, telecom-related OMG common object services, and ITU-T TMN support services) from the viewpoint of service-oriented TMN interface design, and then combines them in several conformance profiles that shall be supported by operations systems claiming conformance to ITU-T Recs Q.816, or Q.816.1, or this Recommendation. + +### 10.2.1 Conformance points + +The individual functions of CORBA-based TMN services described earlier in this Recommendation, or in ITU-T Recs Q.816 and Q.816.1, are summarized conveniently as conformance points. These conformance points are combined in the next clause in conformance profiles for the three CORBA framework paradigms (fine-grained, coarse-grained, and service-oriented). + +- 1) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Basic ORB* requirements (including *Minimum CORBA*) shall: + - in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, support the version of CORBA (i.e., the ORB) specified in clause 5.2/Q.816; + - in case of service-oriented interfaces, support the mandatory ORB requirements specified in clause 8.1. +- 2) An operations system claiming (stepwise) conformance to the *Advanced ORB* requirements (including *CORBA Messaging*) shall: + - be Basic ORB conformant; + - in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, support the (optional) CORBA messaging requirements specified in clause 6.4/Q.816; + - in case of service-oriented interfaces, support step-by-step the optional ORB requirements specified in clause 8.1. +- 3) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Naming Service* requirements shall: + - support the OMG naming service with the version specified in clause 5.2/Q.816, and evolve towards the version specified by [17]; + - in case of fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces, support the naming service requirements specified in clause 6.1/Q.816, and the naming service capabilities identified in detail in clause C.1/Q.816, **except** for the fact that in case of coarse-grained interfaces managed object names are not required to be bound to managed object IORs in the naming service; + +- in case of coarse-grained interfaces, +support the naming service requirements specified in clause 8.1/Q.816.1; +- in case of service-oriented interfaces, +support the naming service requirements specified in clause 8.2 (which include the naming service capabilities identified in clause C.1/Q.816). + +NOTE 1 – This conformance point includes the conformance point 1) of clause 8.1.1/Q.816. + +- 4) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Notification Service* requirements shall: +- support either: + - the OMG notification service with the version specified in clause 5.2/Q.816, and evolve towards the version specified by [19]; + - the 3GPP `NotificationIRP` interface specified in [24] together with an OMG notification service as specified by [19]; + - the 3GPP `NotificationIRP` interface specified in [24] without using a notification service but (partly) implementing some OMG notification service interfaces as specified in [19]; + - in exceptional and provisional cases an implementation of the observer design pattern (see clauses 9.1.1 and 6.5) that complies with **ORB-4** (see clause 8.1); + - if the OMG notification service is supported, support the mandatory notification service requirements specified in clause 8.3, and the notification service capabilities identified in detail in clauses C.2 and C.3/Q.816. + +NOTE 2 – This conformance point includes and corrects the conformance point 2) of clause 8.1.1/Q.816. + +- 5) An OS claiming conformance to the *Telecom Log Service* requirements shall: +- support either: + - the OMG telecom log service with the version specified in clause 5.2/Q.816, and evolve towards the version specified by [20]; + - the 3GPP `NotificationLogIRP` interface specified in [25] together with an OMG notification service as specified by [19]; + - the 3GPP `NotificationLogIRP` interface specified in [25] without using a `Notification Service` but (partly) implementing some OMG `Notification Service` interfaces as specified in [25] and [19]; + - if the OMG telecom log service is supported, support the mandatory telecom log service requirements specified in clause 8.4, and the telecom log service capabilities identified in detail in clause C.4/Q.816, **except** for conflicts with **LOG-7** in case of service-oriented interfaces. + +NOTE 3 – This conformance point includes the conformance point 3) of clause 8.1.1/Q.816. + +- 6) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Concurrency Control and Object Transaction Services* requirements shall: +- support the OMG concurrency control service (CCS) version specified by [36]; + - optionally support the OMG object transaction service (OTS) version specified in clause 5.2/Q.816, and evolve towards the version specified by [37]; + - support the concurrency control and object transaction services requirements specified in clause 8.5 as appropriate. + +- 7) An operations system claiming conformance to the *CORBAsecurity* requirements shall: + - if the OMG security service is used, support the version specified in clause 6.5/Q.816, and evolve towards the version specified by [38]; + - support the CORBAsecurity requirements specified in clause 8.6 as appropriate; + - support the required version of CORBA (i.e., the ORB). +- 8) An OS claiming conformance to the *Factory Finder Service* requirements shall: + - support the factory finder service interface described in clause 7.1/Q.816 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A/Q.816. +- 9) An OS claiming conformance to the *Channel Finder Service* requirements shall: + - support the channel finder service interface described in clause 7.2/Q.816 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A/Q.816. +- 10) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Terminator Service* requirements shall: + - support the terminator service interface described in clause 7.3/Q.816 and defined by the CORBA IDL in Annex A/Q.816; + - in case of coarse-grained interfaces, support the terminator service requirements specified in clause 9.3/Q.816.1. +- 11) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Basic MOO Service* requirements shall: + - support the mandatory MOO service requirements described in 7.4.3/Q.816; + - in case of coarse-grained interfaces, support the MOO service requirements specified in clause 9.4/Q.816.1. +- 12) An OS claiming conformance to the *Advanced MOO Service* requirements shall: + - be basic MOO service conformant; + - support the optional MOO service requirements described in clause 7.4.3/Q.816. +- 13) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Heartbeat Service* requirements shall: + - support the heartbeat service interface described in clause 7.5/Q.816 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A/Q.816. +- 14) An OS claiming conformance to the *Containment Service* requirements shall: + - support the mandatory containment service requirements described in clause 9.6/Q.816.1 and the containment service interface defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A/Q.816.1 including synchronization with the naming service where required. +- 15) An operations system claiming conformance to the *Session Service* requirements shall: + - support the session service requirements described in clause 9.1 and the session service interfaces defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A taking clause 10.1 into consideration. + +### 10.2.2 Conformance profiles + +This clause combines the conformance points of the previous clause in conformance profiles for ITU-T Rec. Q.816 (see clause 8.1.2/Q.816), ITU-T Rec. Q.816.1 (see clause 10.1.2/Q.816.1) and this Recommendation. + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816 Core Profile* (fine-grained) shall support: + +- 1) the basic ORB requirements (see conformance point 1); +- 2) the naming service requirements (see conformance point 3); +- 3) the notification service requirements (see conformance point 4). + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816 Basic Profile* (fine-grained) shall support: + +- 1) the Q.816 core profile; +- 2) the factory finder service requirements (see conformance point 8); +- 3) the channel finder service requirements (see conformance point 9); +- 4) the terminator service requirements (see conformance point 10); +- 5) the basic MOO Service requirements (see conformance point 11). + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816.1 Core Profile* (coarse-grained) shall support: + +- 1) the Q.816 core profile (coarse-grained); +- 2) the containment service requirements (see conformance point 14). + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816.1 Basic Profile* (coarse-grained) shall support: + +- 1) the Q.816 basic profile (coarse-grained); +- 2) the containment service requirements (see conformance point 14). + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816.2 Core Profile* (service-oriented) shall support: + +- 1) the basic ORB requirements (see conformance point 1); +- 2) the naming Service requirements (see conformance point 3); +- 3) the notification service requirements (see conformance point 4). + +An OS claiming conformance to the *Q.816.2 Basic Profile* (service-oriented) shall support: + +- 1) the Q.816.2 core profile; +- 2) the session service requirements (see conformance point 15). + +The definition of advanced conformance profiles with regard to the support of OMG ORB capabilities, OMG common object services, and ITU-T TMN support services (including the definition of new support services, if required) is for further study. For example, fine-grained and coarse-grained interfaces could also support the session service requirements and become gradually more service-oriented along the lines outlined in clauses 6.7 and 7.3, and all three choices for TMN interface design could support the optional notification service requirements (see clause 8.3) or some of the telecom log service requirements (see conformance point 5). + +## **10.3 Conformance statement guidelines** + +The users of this framework must be careful when writing conformance statements. Because IDL modules are being used as name spaces, they may, as allowed by OMG IDL rules, be split across files. Thus, when an IDL module is extended its name will not change. Instead, a new IDL file will simply be added. Simply stating the name of an IDL module in a conformance statement, therefore, will not suffice to identify a set of IDL interfaces. The conformance statement shall identify a document and month of publication to make sure the right version of IDL is identified. + +A standards document claiming compliance to the service-oriented framework may specify a lightweight IDL file structure where modules are not allowed to be split into multiple files (and therefore updates of IDL modules always result in updates of IDL files). + +/\*\* + +# Annex A + +## Service-oriented framework support services IDL + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +\*/ + +/\* This IDL code is intended to be stored in a file named "itut\_q816\_2.idl" located in the search path used by IDL compilers on your system. Most comments are formatted to be parsed by an IDL-to-HTML converter. \*/ + +#ifndef ITUT\_Q816\_2\_IDL +#define ITUT\_Q816\_2\_IDL + +// \*\*\*\*\* +// \* \* +// \* itut\_q816\_2.idl \* +// \* \* +// \*\*\*\*\* + +/\* + +This file defines an extensible, service-oriented NML-EML interface in CORBA IDL, more generally an OS-OS interface according to Rec. M.3010, where one OS takes a client/manager role (e.g., an NMS) and the other OS takes a server/agent role (e.g., an EMS). The OS in a client role is called managing system, and the OS in a server role is called managed system. The IDL uses the modules "globaldefs" and "common" of the service-oriented modelling IDL of Recommendation X.780.2 and defines a Session Service according to Recommendation Q.816.2. + +The IDL is organised into the following modules, interfaces, operations, exceptions, attributes, and data types. + +| module | interface | operation | +|-------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------| +| idlVersion | Version_I | getVersion() | +| session | Session_I | ping()
endSession() | +| nmsSession | NmsSession_I | eventLossOccurred()
eventLossCleared()
alarmLossOccurred() | +| emsSession | EmsSession_I | getSupportedManagers()
getManager()
getEventChannel() | +| emsSessionFactory | EmsSessionFactory_I | getEmsSession() | + + + +| module | exception, attribute | data type | +|-------------------|----------------------|----------------| +| idlVersion | - | - | +| session | associatedSession | - | +| nmsSession | - | - | +| emsSession | - | managerNames_T | +| emsSessionFactory | - | - | + +\*/ + +// Include list +#include "itut\_x780\_2.idl" +#include "OMGidl/CosNotifyChannelAdmin.idl" + +#pragma prefix "itu.int" + +/\*\* + +## A.1 Module idlVersion + +``` +*/ + +/** + *

This module contains the definition of the Version interface + * of the NML-EML interface.

+ **/ + +module idlVersion +{ + /** + *

The interface Version_I allows the NMS to query the current + * version of the IDL interface (IDL version) implemented by the EMS. + * In order to use this CORBA interface, the NMS needs to invoke the + * getVersion() service to figure out which version of the NML-EML interface + * the EMS is providing. getVersion() should be called by any NMS + * before other communications with an EMS. The NMS can determine + * from the response string which IDL version of the EMS is available.

+ * + *

For details on how to support multiple versions of the IDL see + * clause 9.1.2.5/Q.816.2 "Server Session Factory interface" and clause + * 10.5.4/X.780.2 "Versioning of CORBA IDL specifications".

+ **/ + interface Version_I + { + /** + *

This service returns the version of the IDL interface (IDL version) + * that the corresponding EMS supports.

+ * + *

The format of the return string is as follows:
+ * Release.Major[.Minor], + * where Release, Major and Minor + * are strings that contain only digits.

+ * + *

For example, "2.1" indicates release 2 and major release 1, + * "1.3" indicates release 1 and major release 3, and so on. + * Note that "x.y" has the same meaning as "x.y.0". + * The minor digit is used for bug fixing of the major release + * (e.g., "1.2.1" is a minor release on "1.2").

+ * + * @returns string: The IDL version of the NML-EML interface. + **/ + string getVersion(); + }; // end of interface +}; // end of module + +/** +``` + +### A.2 Module session + +``` +*/ + +/** + *

This module contains the definition of the Session interface + * of the NML-EML interface.

+ **/ + +module session +{ + /** + *

The Session_I interface provides capabilities to manage a + * client/server connection, which is called a session. Its main + * purpose is to enable either a client or a server to detect the + * loss of communication with the associated party.

+ * +``` + +``` + +*

For a single communication session between an NMS and an EMS, there +* are two Session_I objects. One is maintained on the NMS; the other one +* is maintained on the EMS. The Session_I object maintained on the EMS is +* actually an EmsSession_I while the Session_I object maintained on the +* NMS is actually an NmsSession_I (both inherit from Session_I).

+* +*

Each Session_I object is responsible to "ping" the other Session_I +* object periodically to detect communication failures. Exactly when this +* is done is up to the implementation.

+* +*

When a Session_I object detects a communication failure, or when +* the endSession() operation is called on it, all resources allocated +* with that communication session must be freed and the Session_I object +* must be deleted.

+**/ + +interface Session_I +{ +/** + *

This attribute contains a reference to the Session_I object on the + * other side (NMS/EMS) to which the object is associated. It is readonly. + * The attribute can (and should) be checked to make sure the + * NmsSession_I/EmsSession_I association is still valid + * (in particular in case of communication failures).

+ **/ + readonly attribute Session_I associatedSession; + +/** + *

Allows for the detection of loss of communication. + * It is implementation-specific to differentiate intermittent + * problems from loss of connection.

+ **/ + void ping(); + +/** + *

Allows for a controlled disconnect between associated parties. + * All resources allocated for this session are deleted by the + * operation. Best-effort semantics are expected of invocations of + * this operation (which does not guarantee delivery of the call); + * the default semantics are exactly-once if the operation successfully + * returns or at-most-once if a (standard) exception is returned.

+ **/ + oneway void endSession(); + +}; // end of interface + +}; // end of module + +/** + +A.3 Module nmsSession +*/ + +/** + *

This module contains the definition of the NmsSession interface + * of the NML-EML interface.

+ * + *

The nmsSession module provides a means for the server to inform the + * NMS in case of notification losses and termination of a loss period.

+ **/ + +module nmsSession +{ + /** + *

This interface is instantiated at the NMS. The NMS passes a handle + * to an instance of this interface in the client parameter of the + * getEmsSession() operation of EmsSessionFactory_I.

+ */ + +``` + +``` + +interface NmsSession_I : session::Session_I +{ +/** + *

When an EMS fails to push an event, it can notify all connected + * NMSes by invoking this method on every active NmsSession_I. + * This method should also be invoked on any new NmsSession_I set up + * during the event loss period.

+ * + *

Once the EMS invokes this method on the NmsSession_Is, it sets + * an internal flag to indicate that it has already informed NMSes of + * event loss. As long as this flag is set, the EMS will not invoke + * this method again. It however may invoke alarmLossOccurred() + * if it discards a non-lifecycle event.

+ * + *

When this method is invoked on an NmsSession_I, the NMS comes to + * know that the EMS has failed to push one or more events that may be + * of interest to it. The NMS should consider itself to be potentially + * out-of-sync with the EMS. It should wait until the EMS calls + * eventLossCleared() before resynchronizing with the EMS.

+ * + * @parm globaldefs::Time_T startTime: The time of detection of + * the first notification loss. + * + * @parm string notificationId: The notificationId of the first + * notification lost. + **/ +void eventLossOccurred( + in globaldefs::Time_T startTime, + in string notificationId); + +/** + *

The EMS invokes this method to indicate that the event (or + * alarm etc.) loss period is over, and that it is now capable of + * providing all relevant notifications.

+ * + *

After invoking this method on the NmsSession_Is, the EMS clears + * the internal flag set by alarmLossOccured() or/and eventLossOccurred(). + * If an event or alarm etc. loss occurs again, alarmLossOccurred() or + * eventLossOccurred() will be called again.

+ * + *

How and when the EMS decides to invoke eventLossCleared() is + * an EMS implementation detail.

+ * + * @parm globaldefs::Time_T endTime: The time of the end of + * the event loss period, as determined by the EMS. + **/ +void eventLossCleared( + in globaldefs::Time_T endTime); + +/** + *

When an EMS discards an alarm, a TCA, a file transfer status, + * or another non-lifecycle event (with regard to the lifecycle of + * the event source), it can notify all connected NMSes by + * invoking this method on every active NmsSession_I. This service + * should also be invoked on any new NmsSession_I set up during + * the event loss period.

+ * + *

Once the EMS invokes this method on the NmsSession_Is, it sets + * an internal flag to indicate that it has already informed NMSes + * of alarm etc. loss. As long as this flag is set, the EMS will not + * invoke this method again. It however may invoke eventLossOccurred() + * if it fails to push a different type of event.

+ * + *

When this method is invoked on an NmsSession_I, the NMS comes to + * know that the EMS has discarded one or more alarms, TCAs, file + * transfer statuses, or notifications of other types that may be + * of interest to it. The NMS should consider itself to be potentially + * out-of-sync with the EMS with respect to these notification types. + * It should wait until the EMS calls eventLossCleared() before + * resynchronizing with the EMS on alarms, TCAs, file transfer statuses, + * and the other non-lifecycle notification types.

+ */ + +``` + +``` + +* +* @parm globaldefs::Time_T startTime: The time of the first +* notification discard. +* +* @parm string notificationId: The notificationId of the first +* notification discarded. +**/ +void alarmLossOccurred( + in globaldefs::Time_T startTime, + in string notificationId); + +}; // end of interface + +}; // end of module + +/** + +A.4 Module emsSession +*/ + +/** + *

This module contains the definition of the EmsSession interface + * of the NML-EML interface.

+ * + *

The emsSession module provides a means for the client to + * interrogate the EMS to determine which manager CORBA interfaces + * (i.e., service-oriented façades) it actually supports. The NMS can + * then retrieve an instance of each of the manager interfaces it + * requires. This capability is achieved using generic IDL so that + * new manager interfaces can be easily added.

+ * + *

The module also provides access to the unique OMG event channel + * to be used within the session.

+ **/ + +module emsSession +{ + /** + *

Sequence of manager names, i.e., a list of names of service-oriented + * façades, as defined by NML-EML interface specifications that extend + * this framework and preferably derived from the IDL names of the manager + * CORBA interfaces that inherit from common::Common_I.

+ **/ + typedef sequence managerNames_T; + + /** + *

A handle to an instance of this interface is gained via the + * emsSessionInterface parameter of the getEmsSession() operation + * of EmsSessionFactory_I.

+ */ + interface EmsSession_I : session::Session_I + { + /** + *

This allows an NMS to request the manager CORBA interfaces that + * the EMS implements.

+ * + * @parm managerNames_T supportedManagerList: The list of manager names + * supported by the EMS (see managerNames_T type). + * + * @raises globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException + * EXCPT_INTERNAL_ERROR - Raised in case of non-specific EMS internal + * failure
+ * EXCPT_ACCESS_DENIED - Raised in case of security violation
+ **/ + void getSupportedManagers( + out managerNames_T supportedManagerList) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + } +} + +``` + +``` + +/** + *

This operation allows an NMS to gain access to an instance of + * the specified manager CORBA interface (i.e., service-oriented façade) + * without using the OMG Naming Service.

+ * + * @parm string managerName: The class or type name of the manager + * object that the client wants to access (see getSupportedManagers() + * operation). + * + * @parm common::Common_I managerInterface: A CORBA IOR for the manager + * object. The actual object returned will implement the specified manager + * interface. However it is returned as a Common_I object (see module + * common) so that this operation can be generic. The client should + * narrow the returned object reference to the correct object type. + * + * @raises globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException + * EXCPT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED - Raised if the EMS does not support the manager
+ * EXCPT_INTERNAL_ERROR - Raised in case of non-specific EMS internal + * failure
+ * EXCPT_ACCESS_DENIED - Raised in case of security violation
+ *
+ */ +void getManager( + in string managerName, + out common::Common_I managerInterface) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + +/** + *

This operation allows an NMS to gain access to the OMG event + * channel to receive notifications. It returns a reference to a + * NotifyChannel interface instance (which is an EventChannel) as + * defined by the OMG Notification Service. When the EMS supports + * the OMG Telecom Log Service, this operation will return a + * reference to a NotifyLog interface instance (which is a + * NotifyChannel and an EventLog).

+ * + * @parm CosNotifyChannelAdmin::EventChannel eventChannel: + * The event channel (NotifyChannel or NotifyLog) to be used + * by the NMS in this session. + * + * @raises globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException + * EXCPT_INTERNAL_ERROR - Raised in case of non-specific EMS internal + * failure
+ * EXCPT_ACCESS_DENIED - Raised in case of security violation
+ *
+ */ +void getEventChannel( + out CosNotifyChannelAdmin::EventChannel eventChannel) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + +}; // end of interface + +}; // end of module + +/** + +A.5 Module emsSessionFactory +*/ + +/** + *

This module contains the definition of the EmsSessionFactory + * interface of the NML-EML interface.

+ */ + +module emsSessionFactory +{ + /** + *

There is a single instance of the EmsSessionFactory_I (per + * supported IDL version). It is the entry point to the server/EMS. + */ + +``` + +``` + + * This instance provides the object reference that the client/NMS + * uses to connect to the server (if the IDL version fits).

+ * + *

This CORBA interface implements the Version interface and will + * return the server's IDL version (i.e., the version of the NML-EML + * interface) when getVersion() is called on it.

+ + +interface EmsSessionFactory_I : idlVersion::Version_I +{ + + *

This operation allows the client/NMS to obtain the EmsSession_I + * object from which all managers of the server/EMS can be obtained + * (i.e., all service-oriented façade objects actually implemented + * by the server/EMS).

+ * + * @parm string user: The (registered) user or application that is + * trying to access the EMS. The user name can be the empty string + * to indicate that no authentication mechanism is implemented by the + * EMS. The format is defined by the interface specifications + * that extend this framework. + * + * @parm string password: The password/passphrase of the user; it + * can be the empty string. The format and possible encryption are + * defined by the interface specifications that extend this framework. + * + * @parm nmsSession::NmsSession_I client: A handle to the NmsSession_I + * object, instantiated at the NMS, to which the returned EmsSession_I + * object will be associated. + * + * @parm emsSession::EmsSession_I emsSessionInterface: + * A CORBA IOR for the EmsSession_I interface object instantiated + * for the (authenticated) user. + * + * @raises globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException + * EXCPT_INTERNAL_ERROR - Raised in case of non-specific EMS internal + * failure
+ * EXCPT_INVALID_INPUT - Raised when client is invalid (see errorReason + * for details provided by the EMS if applicable)
+ * EXCPT_ACCESS_DENIED - Raised in case of security violation + * (e.g., when user or password is invalid) (see errorReason + * for details provided by the EMS if applicable)
+ *
+ +void getEmsSession( + in string user, + in string password, + in nmsSession::NmsSession_I client, + out emsSession::EmsSession_I emsSessionInterface) + raises(globaldefs::ProcessingFailureException); + +}; // end of interface + +}; // end of module + +#endif // end of #ifndef ITUT_Q816_2_IDL + +``` + +# Bibliography + +The following references contain information that was used in the development of the framework for CORBA-based service-oriented TMN interfaces. + +- [30] OMG TC Documents orbos/97-05-15 and orbos/97-05-16, *ORB Portability Joint Submission (Final)*. +- [31] OMG TC Document orbos/98-01-18, *Objects By Value Joint Revised Submission (with errata)*. See also OMG TC Document ptc/98-07-06, *OBV 2.3 RTF Report*. +- [32] OMG TC Document orbos/98-08-04, *Minimum CORBA*. See also: OMG Document formal/01-02-59, *Chapter 23 of [14]*; OMG Document formal/02-08-01, *Minimum CORBA Specification*. +- [33] OMG TC Document orbos/98-05-05, *CORBA Messaging*. See also: OMG Document formal/01-02-58, *Chapter 22 of [14]*, February 2001; OMG Document formal/04-03-20, *Chapter 22 of [21]*, March 2004. +- [34] OMG Document formal/98-12-09, *CORBAservices: Common Object Services Specification*. See also OMG Document formal/97-02-24, November 1996. +- [35] OMG Document formal/05-02-02, *Lightweight Log Service Specification*, Version 1.1. +- [36] OMG Document formal/03-09-02, *Concurrency Control Service (CCS) Specification*, Version 1.0, April 2000. See also *Chapter 7 of [34]*, March 1995. +- [37] OMG Document formal/03-09-02, *Transaction Service Specification*, Version 1.4. See also *Chapter 10 of [34]*, November 1997. +- [38] OMG Document formal/02-03-11, *Security Service Specification*, Version 1.8. See also: OMG TC Document 1994/94-07-01, *Object Services RFP3: Security and Time Services*, July 1994; OMG TC Document 1995/95-12-01, *CORBA Security Joint Revised Submission*, December 1995; [39]; [40]; OMG Document formal/98-12-17, *Chapter 15 of [34]*, December 1998. +- [39] OMG TC Document orbos/96-06-20, *Common Secure Interoperability Joint Submission*, July 1996. See also OMG TC Document orb/96-01-03, *Common Secure IIOP RFP*, February 1996. +- [40] IETF TLS Working Group Internet-Draft, *The SSL Protocol Version 3.0*, November 1996, draft-freier-ssl-version3-02.txt (Alan O. Freier, Philip Karlton, Paul C. Kocher). See also . +- [41] OMG TC Document orbos/97-02-04, *Secure Sockets Layer/CORBA Security Joint Revised Submission*, February 1997. See also OMG TC Document orbos/96-08-02, *Secure Sockets Layer/CORBA Security RFP*, August 1996. +- [42] OMG TC Document orbos/98-05-04, *CORBA/Firewall Security Joint Revised Submission*, May 1998. See also: OMG TC Document cf/97-06-07, *CORBA/Firewall Security RFP*, June 1997; OMG TC Document orbos/98-07-03, *CORBA/Firewall Security Joint Revised Submission + Errata*, July 1998. +- [43] IETF RFC 4346 (2006), *The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1*. See also IETF RFC 2246 (1999), *The TLS Protocol Version 1.0*. + +- [44] OMG TC Document formal/02-06-17, *ORB Interoperability Architecture*, Revision 3.0, changebar version, July 2002. See also: *Chapter 13 of [21]*, May 2002; *Chapter 13 of [22]*, March 2004; previous changebar versions: 2.6 (formal/01-12-17, December 2001), 2.5 (formal/01-09-50, September 2001), 2.4.2 (formal/01-02-17, February 2001), 2.4.1 (formal/00-11-05, November 2000), 2.4 (formal/00-10-17, October 2000), 2.3 (formal/99-07-17, June 1999). +- [45] OMG TC Document formal/02-06-19, *General Inter-ORB Protocol*, Revision 3.0, changebar version, July 2002. See also: OMG TC Document ptc/04-04-06, *Firewall Traversal FTF – revised GIOP chapter*, April 2004; *Chapter 15 of [21]*, May 2002; *Chapter 15 of [22]*, March 2004; previous changebar versions: 2.6 (formal/01-12-19, December 2001), 2.5 (formal/01-09-52, September 2001), 2.4.2 (formal/01-02-19, February 2001), 2.4 (formal/00-10-19, October 2000), 2.3.1 (formal/99-10-11, October 1999). +- [46] OMG TC Document formal/01-12-64, *Secure Interoperability*, December 2001. See also: OMG TC Document orbos/99-01-10, *Common Secure Interoperability Version 2 RFP*, January 1999; OMG TC Document orbos/00-08-04, *CSIV2 Joint Revised Submission*, July 2000; *Chapter 26 of [21]*, May 2002; *Chapter 24 of [22]*, March 2004; OMG TC Document ptc/04-04-09, *Firewall Traversal FTF – revised Secure Interoperability chapter*, April 2004. +- [47] OMG TC Document pas/04-08-01, ISO/IEC 19500-1:200x, *CORBA Specification, Version 3.1, Part 1: CORBA Interfaces*, Draft 1, August 2004. +- [48] OMG TC Document pas/04-08-02, ISO/IEC 19500-2:200x, *CORBA Specification, Version 3.1, Part 2: CORBA Interoperability*, Draft 1, August 2004. +- [49] OMG TC Document ptc/04-04-05, *CORBA Firewall Traversal Convenience Document*, April 2004. See also: OMG TC Document orbos/00-09-20, *CORBA Firewall Traversal RFP*, September 2000; OMG TC Document orbos/01-10-10, *CORBA Firewall Traversal Joint Revised Submission with Errata Applied*, October 2001. +- [50] OMG TC Document ptc/05-02-02, *SECurity Protocol (SECP) Specification*, February 2005. See also OMG TC Document security/02-09-02, *SECP RFP*, September 2002. +- [51] OMG TC Document ab/98-06-03, *OMG IDL Style Guide*, June 1998. +- [52] GAMMA (Erich), HELM (Richard), JOHNSON (Ralph), VLISSIDES (John): *Design Patterns – Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software*, Addison-Wesley, August 1994, ISBN 0-201-63361-2. +- [53] Siemens AG, Using CORBA for Multi-Technology Network Management (MTNM), *TM Forum MTNM Contribution*, May 2003, . + + + +# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d213e2167f40db44caa40d0b7984ea25e00aa88 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ab75cb175e5f9363d7a75af0a6f2cfcdd256f645c311d23b33edae760e8b20 +size 8242 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a93435e9b69e38e41c539eb4c0bf8624f8c23004 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ba6959eb04311960f3c0495e05468808c361c939c9b9974c7f08beec74517288 +size 77006 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6091d0e86c8162500978dd13aaa38951d43d5e3e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f1065fb3873b1497c2e9685649349fd502a12ec4b3d48dd2dfce4fb80a6854d0 +size 133540 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..961a375abfe1a96ece18decbba54f737015d9c14 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:41b28f5a7acb32e5fa57f924272782480e9708a1b48857f6f156038397b49f66 +size 6008 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cfcc9dd08755cb09c427275d72905596ea43845 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac388a7b64bc7c0b8283be7fbd0c9de78ccf5fa5177a940ebc2f9d11d991599a +size 114995 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9def09efb6a13f486206eecd81d173debba6f0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7f44b2fe41d772c21023140dea2f4320827ce49f79bbda157c2aa12cf6d9583c +size 13924 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31820a5603b78a3681bc4de1f150e6caaba3dd5f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:493e097e910482235922ded0d40872012b95da3615a366a818d3e85e1b9a75e4 +size 155224 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/fb4274c4b7882a4059103f1dbca9b111_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/fb4274c4b7882a4059103f1dbca9b111_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28de5bcad21b89d267fb2a552174d246fbeb67d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.0-199510-I_PDF-E/fb4274c4b7882a4059103f1dbca9b111_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2d90a4664b841ef9411ffc72460ac5cac94d0a8db27095c5084a91e682a7036a +size 62523 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.83.3-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.83.3-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..679fc25d5ae70f10d503cacb3a4581b052da84e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.83.3-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ + + +# STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION FOR CALL COMPLETION SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES + +Recommendation Q.83.3 + +### COMPLETION OF CALL TO BUSY SUBSCRIBER + +This service, already identified, requires further study. + +\* \* \* + +Recommandation Q.83.3 + +### RAPPEL AUTOMATIQUE SUR ABONNÉ OCCUPÉ + +Ce service a été identifié et reste à étudier. + +\* \* \* + +Recomendación Q.83.3 + +### COMPLECIÓN DE LLAMADAS A ABONADO OCUPADO + +Este servicio ha sido identificado y sigue en estudio. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a8e14fdac0ea384e2a636a7eccf33b29c0637cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8c09f9b4baf7756f1ac56202b82d5416ee069fb93f47ddd2bbe19759aa500335 +size 86660 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f4734bf98042f945e06f684804896f74e868145 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e82da35c255e8674583c4c3dc67a7b3c0d5ac1f0854a90774dd8432aac360c38 +size 8237 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3442f31a562d1ef45bfa18b18a6a1ddc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3442f31a562d1ef45bfa18b18a6a1ddc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc7797de06a45b59cb3e3625dbebdd38dfdf0ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3442f31a562d1ef45bfa18b18a6a1ddc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac0d5c2df26f896b29d238410c4bdd8550b6a332cc870905d3c9cb138fd6d2b5 +size 69380 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..77bdae7ce72146fa54135ba35df4b23c68b707ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2df5f5aa05dbe5aa34f83c96f60ca8c90309df66d917af9d0873ff498fbed7a0 +size 287085 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a01c5856f12538a4a4ea0579675fef42b649b04d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/4ee27dbf5ef12e7b58b0ef0937bc5a5e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:abaab40534257aa6de911d5f3545da40bb4b274240ca197b59159ec2036611c1 +size 112273 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2deb5f751d72cfea551701b043e63542f606a934 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:70ce5351f11788d38533eca3ad042f9c680e216f7cce6862e1cdd9ca17d569e5 +size 160406 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/bc9d0c0b02cbe628b1b6548cc1107734_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/bc9d0c0b02cbe628b1b6548cc1107734_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..310c9fc1df3535e297f777c76ac7c6c5af52c51a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/bc9d0c0b02cbe628b1b6548cc1107734_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f0adf3dd74d37bf23d23176d97298cf4abcf172146423c1a379d0b5d9ab2f4d4 +size 39589 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/c99bf3a0530a3e58f5f2d2790ba7441b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/c99bf3a0530a3e58f5f2d2790ba7441b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ee3bc2f3581f6b054c9ae609e988271835d9e72 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/c99bf3a0530a3e58f5f2d2790ba7441b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:46a37ab843daaa6e90fb30c36fcbed45ae148e747e408885c281f2c9466dd423 +size 41793 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0bd53b727d69241d028524b90160f20e81a16c8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/dcc2d5a5b39f780e7a224bb01ba1ef6e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:38a6c94d1b7dfce2ecfd73b9577ab0a955fc95094325e22922d23e456333f6a1 +size 78763 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/eb1a67ebd688e354edaacb7ec2abf5ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/eb1a67ebd688e354edaacb7ec2abf5ad_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..825cb0179ff5415393a811ee09f585b9472b47fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/eb1a67ebd688e354edaacb7ec2abf5ad_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d0b24aea062b4c889a94858ebc4c91d7cda9488226e89a5d90217321843b1050 +size 52143 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3862653f351d0a83b9e47520996187ec3e479b84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f14439bcbc8b1d9e10837cd2aee085b104d83fcbd67a996142e1c1b08307627f +size 96505 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e633d033f08f7a800788644e50217a00d3d7179 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9ffc53a8e8fe72c299ae5379e7a62098e07cd293d2fe27218817682bd36eadb5 +size 75963 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bbc628cfde1a40a0a14e22483a475aedb37b8837 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/fbfa653853daf5541118a9ddecb92284_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8eea4b2f611d5a61ebf0ef20d436952d67b41e729b920eb05911c7485309a87d +size 38442 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06564e1f80f3813b483b0621f6e1d86894896bf8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.1-199806-I_PDF-E/ff0952ef692c9d960ce5f6708bcc9711_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ce0dbf5bca681f17e557beabc5d910e51c54adb6dbfde33e3434f24335ec9d58 +size 120381 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ab808660780bb74841ac3bbd2ec245a989c681b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2a6ed3455af688f04b7a4e0eadab4d51f40321caad494aeda9ba158c9aefcfd9 +size 34841 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22ae9ebdea9b51453430f8f1eec96d3dbc3b7c43 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e10c8f5c58c1323c42c6cd1928d748c09cc309115dcd821f1e68faff41795380 +size 8357 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28e9104608cef4d8c7fb3e8a60314a2b78a82538 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/7f17c430b9598e4d748a8041457810b3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:84dd4112601c6ee4a56f36ca2749c5f0aa3fed1bde8427267a0e68fecff98c9a +size 17913 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..618cf07388b26ccfd85b82dbc43334dae0a2a8ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.832.3-200101-I_PDF-E/8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:efef073bd8d97ef6b98b95024dab44ffb486012607381b6d6e43aeb93a51ecd3 +size 38885 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab2cbdd4af6bc1ea9ffa8cca87f9d455eb147008 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:94ee226724314e8b36ac3c73e99f9ed2a4fbb4786e0c7f3f43c1debd5966aa00 +size 8239 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be06be0486a5abdbd4a9186582a263ce06b74252 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/474a819357587e34949a3e110ff19b30_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a26d1294682cb8ebecff64d3a50c040abe0ac911222cd203d807765c77ec2d48 +size 87237 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99260ca866526c3cdfeaaccb6e713c41e653b250 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:638fe5e0f22d6a2d48c3b00daac209cd0517625ed408d961da67614a336c8a8f +size 55340 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2599d17a88f808106a23be70a69c77739d5aefd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/744acfe8d4e31bcf03f95714c2f6e567_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:012b35ab900bfb37081185b3e8e3fdabc4721c2684173c4fb1c5a5351bf33af2 +size 88194 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce8f83432b99b61c340c52e60b74b4b2bb239577 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/b9ecbc3baefab13719e000faa6e0c7eb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1119ccd48975bd5a554159e75f8ee55cde3c86058b3c2029aed69ffa5ab65d24 +size 75768 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee42c4da374ed33dfcdd3bfdd303baad1a9ccba4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0f01a4bf4fbfd4e37595487e794f92f5278d4e11df176c754c2e2a629a089845 +size 64738 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..498703cdc7d3dc110b48698b6134b51a97e2624f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/dcb5711d118ae6753b0e12f86eda37db_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:94fd9168df3ae6e24ae78034755ee3eca79d2234295123a1bda42fc2ab6d836f +size 83940 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90cab59f9f72a7c565ffbcb70f9c5cdbad9b1b1f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.860-200006-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:546a494797ccca0fa4cf5955c4b13f7b9c99dc89bc7ac3d92a8a56cb1767a4fc +size 79002 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66412856f54ae0b24854202e8f031f6a04b88ee0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a7cafe25d563af62a326eb0e9930129524893e0fb16cb431aacd25f8ed54ed31 +size 7392 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8373fbccd7efa815984d213b1d75df25a40f1b11 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9f25ac1551f76acbf36701505ad405f5469ce159c157672493a1e44dfb2fee8f +size 32550 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b64ef635644e19ebb890ea4979dfb4c63ef3209 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:173623002f231ab3a2690cc15ea1a0f00733479bb0f2b867ebd9d821030bbce6 +size 104566 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/ca5566458a134032dd860e88fdaa0d2b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/ca5566458a134032dd860e88fdaa0d2b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b0891e4ae2ae058c66f668ec9c6ab0e71080083 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/ca5566458a134032dd860e88fdaa0d2b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dc31ca0f5d39e8fc43f3dbe1feb109c6dd46634ad8fb3bc3bb0cd73c82af3ce3 +size 88259 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d17d4a022f435c64c42f3a172ff54fa679962adf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:83673f7bf4917bc73f9322944bb00decc20d2043e2b6f616422e8939e58c44fb +size 57838 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d6ef6e57a7d4c3bd4de55a51dd7249d445e8ee1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.940-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,501 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## Q.940 + +**DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING +SYSTEM No. 1** + +--- + +**ISDN USER - NETWORK INTERFACE +PROTOCOL FOR MANAGEMENT - GENERAL +ASPECTS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.940** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation Q.940 was published in Fascicle VI.11 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# **ISDN USER-NETWORK INTERFACE PROTOCOL FOR MANAGEMENT - GENERAL ASPECTS** + +## **1 General** + +This Recommendation is one of a proposed series of Recommendations describing the management model, service elements and protocol to be provided at the ISDN user-network interface. These Recommendations also specify the management functions required to support the ISDN subscriber installation. This Recommendation describes the Management Architecture and provides a general overview of the management services and functions. + +Other Recommendations in this series will specify the System Management Service Elements and Protocol and the procedures associated with management functions. + +The management functions provided at the user-network interface have, as an objective, full alignment with the network management functions being addressed by the Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) and the Management Framework for Open System Interconnection (OSI). While the TMN defines management functions from a network perspective, this Recommendation describes the management functions from the subscriber perspective and provides for remote user management functions. + +### **1.1 Scope** + +This series of Recommendations will provide for a common approach for management communications to support procedures used by a remote maintenance centre, internal or external to the network and those initiated locally. + +These Recommendations deal with the specification of the following items: + +- a) the specification of a Management Architecture and identification of communications paths; +- b) the specification of management functionality to be provided at the ISDN user-network interface; +- c) the specification of an information exchange protocol for the exchange of management information between two peer system management application entities (SMAE); +- d) the specification of primitives between the Management Application process (user) and the SMAE (i.e., the primitives at the systems management service interface (SMSI)); +- e) the specification of service primitives between the SMAE service element and the next lower layer service elements (i.e., primitives at the presentation layer service access point (PSAP)); +- f) the specification of a convergence function that may be required to permit the direct access of the SMAE service elements to services provided by layer 3 (i.e., the primitives at the network layer service access point (NSAP)). + +### **1.2 Field of application** + +The protocols and procedures described in these Recommendations provide the means to support management functions at the ISDN user-network interface. Management activities that manage network services, operations such as network resource configuration, routing information and maintenance activities shall be supported by the functions and protocols defined in these Recommendations. In particular these management functions should be able to support specific requirements such as those defined in the I.60-Series of Recommendations (Subscriber Access and Installation Maintenance). These protocols make it possible to control loopbacks and diagnostic tests, initiate and terminate event reporting and to exchange management information across the ISDN user-network interface, i.e., between equipment connected to the S/T reference points. + +The physical layer signals in the digital transmission section which are used to control maintenance functions are outside the scope of this Recommendation. + +The protocols can be used on the D Channel of both the basic and primary rate interface structures and across both reference points S and T. The higher layer protocols can also be used on other ISDN channels and services. + +The protocols and procedures described in these Recommendations take into account that interactions with the TMN will occur. It is, therefore, desirable that the services and protocols to be used to support access management are aligned, wherever possible, with those to be defined for the TMN and OSI management. + +## **2 Categories of management information exchange** + +Management information exchanges may be categorized into the following three categories: + +- a) Event notification: information transfer initiated by one system reporting instantaneously the occurrence of an event (e.g., a fault occurrence) to another system. +- b) Data transfer: information exchange initiated by one system in order to get management-related information from another system. These exchanges follow the "request followed by response" paradigm. +- c) Control information: information exchanges which are of an executive nature, where one system requests that an action be performed by another system (e.g., for test access and downloading of parameters). + +## **3 Management functions** + +Management functions may be classified in accordance with fields of application. The following major functions have been identified: + +- a) Fault management + - Maintenance functions + - Fault tracing + - Spontaneous error reporting + - Error threshold alarm reporting + - Continuous monitoring + - Diagnostic testing + - Resource (re)initialization + - Confidence testing + - Resource identification + - Trouble isolation. +- b) Configuration management + - Routing changes + - Data base changes + - Equipment identification + - Network/equipment reconfiguration. +- c) Accounting management + - Reporting of billing data. +- d) Performance management + - Collecting and reporting of traffic data + - Performance monitoring + - Applying controls. +- e) Security management. + +## 4 Management reference models + +### 4.1 Communications path model + +Figure 1/Q.940 shows the entities which may contain System Management Entities (SME) which may require capability to communicate. System Management Entities may be located in the local exchanges, subscriber installations, remote management centres or network management centres. + +The management functions supported by the various systems may differ depending on system requirements and may vary between different networks. However, the communications facilities provided by the systems management entities should be as common as possible. + +The scope of this Recommendation covers those functions and protocols that have immediate impact on the user-network interface. + +The system management entities may be in a TE, NT2 or management service provider. Although communication between any two management entities may be possible in the model, it does not imply that information held at a particular management entity is available to all other management entities. Security mechanisms may be used to restrict access to the information. + +![Management communication model diagram showing entities and their connections.](ca5566458a134032dd860e88fdaa0d2b_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the management communication model. It features three main components: 1. A box on the left labeled '1' containing a 'System management entity' and 'Remote management centre or user TE'. 2. A box in the middle labeled '2' containing a 'System management entity' and 'TE (A)'. 3. A box on the right labeled '3' containing a 'System management entity' and 'Network management functions'. Two 'Subscriber access' boxes are positioned between the left and right components. Solid lines connect the 'System management entity' in box 1 to the top 'Subscriber access' box, and the 'System management entity' in box 2 to the bottom 'Subscriber access' box. Dotted lines with 'X' marks at the ends represent optional communication paths from the 'Subscriber access' boxes to the 'System management entity' in box 3. A large box on the right is labeled 'Telecommunication network (ISDN)'. + +Management communication model diagram showing entities and their connections. + +T1115740-88 + +..... Optional communication paths in the network + +FIGURE 1/Q.940 +Management communication model + +Figure 1/Q.940 shows that three types of management communications can be accommodated: + +- a) TE (or Remote Management Centre) $\longleftrightarrow$ TE (1 $\longleftrightarrow$ 2); +- b) TE $\longleftrightarrow$ Network Management Function (1 $\longleftrightarrow$ 3): +- c) TE $\longleftrightarrow$ Network Management Function $\longleftrightarrow$ TE (1 $\longleftrightarrow$ 3 $\longleftrightarrow$ 2); + +Types a) and b) are direct peer communication. In type c), the TE requests the Network Management Entity to act as an agent which then, on behalf of the requesting TE, communicates with another TE. + +#### 4.1.1 *Secure access to management and maintenance functions* + +To facilitate maintenance procedures and fault sectionalization, maintenance entities located in different management domains may communicate. However, since management and maintenance information is of critical importance to system integrity, access to management functions and information is subject to prior authorization and security restrictions upon access. + +The security restrictions are normally enforced by the recipient of the management information but may be enforced by the originator independently of any security imposed by the recipient. The security measures may include requirements for peer-entity authentication. + +The use of adequate security mechanisms is especially important in the case of a network since many users may be affected by unauthorized access. + +Whenever system management communication crosses an S or T reference point, the requirement for access authorization must be presumed. + +*Note* - This does not preclude implicit actions on layer management parameters as specified within the relevant signalling protocols, e.g., Recommendations Q.921 and Q.931. These actions are, however, beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +### 4.2 *System management entity* + +Figure 2/Q.940 shows the internal structure of the SME. + +#### 4.2.1 *System management application entity (SMAE)* + +The SMAE is an application layer entity that supports system management functions. The SMAE is responsible for communication with peer systems. + +The function of the SMAE is to provide the communications necessary to make a system management accessible to another SMAP. It is not necessary for the SMAE to be provided if only local system management is required. + +#### 4.2.2 **system management application process (SMAP)** + +An SMAP is an application process of a system performing management functions. The SMAP controls the SMAE, and includes the Management Information Base (MIB) and may include one or more managers providing various functionalities. + +#### 4.2.3 **management information base (MIB)** + +The MIB is the repository of all information relevant to the operation of a system. Both the SMAP and Layer Management Entities (LME) have access to the MIB. + +#### 4.2.4 **layer management entity (LME)** + +The LME is that part of a Layer Entity which manages resources and parameters residing in its layer protocol entity. + +4.2.5 **protocol entity (PE)** + +The PE is that part of a layer entity which is dedicated to peer-to-peer communications. A layer PE provides services to the next upper layer and uses services of the next lower layer. + +![FIGURE 2/Q.940 System management entity model diagram showing SMAP, SMAE, LMEs, and PEs across layers L1 to L6.](a738993919a50143787084ee7ce6e2f2_img.jpg) + +``` + + graph TD + subgraph SMAP [System Management Application Process] + direction TB + SMSI[System management service interface - SMSI] + end + + SMSI -- "M-type primitive" --> SMAE[System management application entity - SMAE] + SMAE -- "MIP" --> External[External Interface] + SMAE -- "P-type primitive" --> PSAP((PSAP)) + + subgraph L4_L6 [Layers L4-L6] + direction TB + L6[LME | L6 PE] + L5[LME | L5 PE] + L4[LME | L4 PE] + end + + PSAP --> L6 + L4_L6 -- "Note - See § 4.2.5." --> Note[Note] + L4_L6 --> NSAP((NSAP)) + + subgraph L1_L3 [Layers L1-L3] + direction TB + L3[LME | L3 PE] + L2[LME | L2 PE] + L1[LME | L1 PE] + end + + NSAP -- "N-type primitive" --> L3 + + MIB[Management Information Base - MIB] <--> SMAE + MIB <--> L6 + MIB <--> L5 + MIB <--> L4 + MIB <--> L3 + MIB <--> L2 + MIB <--> L1 + + LMSI[Layer management service interface - LMSI] --- MIB + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the System Management Entity Model. At the top is the System Management Application Process (SMAP), which interacts with the System Management Application Entity (SMAE) via the System management service interface (SMSI) using M-type primitives. The SMAE also has a Management Information Protocol (MIP) interface. Below the SMAE are the protocol layers. Layers L6, L5, and L4 are grouped, connected to the SMAE via a PSAP (Presentation Service Access Point) using P-type primitives. Layers L3, L2, and L1 are grouped below, connected to the upper layers via an NSAP (Network Service Access Point) using N-type primitives. Each layer (L1-L6) and the SMAE are associated with a Layer Management Entity (LME). All LMEs interact with a central Management Information Base (MIB) through the Layer management service interface (LMSI). + +FIGURE 2/Q.940 System management entity model diagram showing SMAP, SMAE, LMEs, and PEs across layers L1 to L6. + +Layer management service interface (LMSI) + +T1107451-88 + + L1 Layer 1, etc. + MIP Management information protocol + LME Layer management entity + PE Protocol entity + +**FIGURE 2/Q.940** +**System management entity model** + +Fascicle VI.11 - Rec. Q.940      5 + +It should be noted that this model presently permits communication between peer management processes either by attaching to a Presentation Layer Access Point (PSAP) or by attaching directly to the Network Layer Service Access Point (NSAP). A convergence function may be provided as an alternative to the full seven layer OSI Reference Model (as specified in Recommendation X.200) to accommodate simple terminals that may be used in the ISDN environment. If provided, the functions will be kept to a minimum, i.e., the OSI layer services lost by elimination of layers 4-6 will not be recovered by the convergence function. Therefore, the use of all seven layers is to be preferred. This has the consequence that "convergence functions" may need to be specified. + +#### 4.2.6 *Management information protocol (MIP)* + +The Management Information Protocol provides the support for information exchange between peer SMAEs. + +### 4.3 *Managed objects: a hierarchical object model* + +#### 4.3.1 *Definitions* + +##### 4.3.1.1 **managed object** + +A managed object is a collection of data objects and telecommunications or information processing resources that may be managed by means of the management protocol specified in this Recommendation. + +4.3.1.2 A **data object** is an object that is the direct recipient of an action or generator of an event report. + +#### 4.3.2 *Hierarchical object model* + +The maintenance functions are described as asymmetric functions using symmetrical communications paths. A maintenance activity is always started by an Invoker who is asking an Executor to manipulate event reports or data objects. These can be classified as belonging to individual managed objects. Each elementary operation that will have to access or refer to data objects will identify these by specifying first the managed object to which they belong and then identifying them within the managed object. + +A hierarchical object model is defined that allows access to any individual data object in a simple way. When a given managed object may be duplicated, an instance identifier will help to resolve the ambiguity. + +As an example, the model for user-network ISDN access interface is represented by the hierarchical tree of Figure 3/Q.940. + +![Hierarchical tree diagram for ISDN interface. The root node is 'ISDN interface' (dashed oval). It branches into 'Bn' and 'D'. 'Bn' branches into 'Bearer circuit mode' and 'Bearer packet mode'. 'D' branches into 'Bearer packet mode' and 'Signalling (packet mode)'. Each of these four modes has three sub-levels labeled L1, L2, and L3.](3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + ISDN([ISDN interface]) + Bn[Bn] + D[D] + Bc[Bearer circuit mode] + Bp1[Bearer packet mode] + Bp2[Bearer packet mode] + S[Signalling (packet mode)] + + ISDN --- Bn + ISDN --- D + Bn --- Bc + Bn --- Bp1 + D --- Bp2 + D --- S + + Bc --- L1c[L1] + Bp1 --- L1p1[L1] + Bp1 --- L2p1[L2] + Bp1 --- L3p1[L3] + Bp2 --- L1p2[L1] + Bp2 --- L2p2[L2] + Bp2 --- L3p2[L3] + S --- L1s[L1] + S --- L2s[L2] + S --- L3s[L3] + +``` + +Hierarchical tree diagram for ISDN interface. The root node is 'ISDN interface' (dashed oval). It branches into 'Bn' and 'D'. 'Bn' branches into 'Bearer circuit mode' and 'Bearer packet mode'. 'D' branches into 'Bearer packet mode' and 'Signalling (packet mode)'. Each of these four modes has three sub-levels labeled L1, L2, and L3. + +T1108820-87 + +FIGURE 3/Q.940 + +**Example hierarchical object tree** + +The parameters and event reports pertaining to a particular managed object can then be defined implicitly within the managed object. Some managed objects may be empty when no data object is identified within them. In this case they are only present as an indication of a hierarchical level. + +It has to be noted that the ISDN user-network access interface model only contains managed objects that belong to the network access functions, i.e., that are involved in the provision of the required bearer service (signalling and lower layer protocols on the bearer channels). The protocols that are not involved in the provision of the bearer service are excluded from this model as they belong to the application part. + +*Note* - The identity of an object at the executing end may not be known to the Invoker when it requests a maintenance action at the remote end of a connection. In this case the Executor will be able to identify the object by the context of the connection path used to convey the maintenance request. + +As an example, remote maintenance may be required on an existing B Channel connection. The channel identity is only locally significant at each end. The maintenance request must be transmitted over the signalling connection that is used to control the B Channel associated with the existing call. The identity of the B Channel will be implied by the signalling connection used to convey the maintenance request. + +## **5 Management structure and activities** + +This section considers the specific structure and activities of management in terms of system management, layer management and protocol processing for management purposes. + +### **5.1 *System management*** + +This section introduces the concept of system management, its boundaries and other structures and activities related to management. + +#### **5.1.1 *Introduction*** + +The scope of system management is described in terms of the bounds of the SMAP. The boundaries show where the SMAP ends and other objects (either inside or outside the system) begin. The boundaries provide a sense of the relationship of the SMAP to other objects and therefore a sense of the SMAP scope. + +#### 5.1.2 System management boundaries + +The boundaries of the SMAP are shown in Figure 4/Q.940. + +![Diagram of SMAP boundaries showing the relationship between People/Software, SMAP, and the Communications component.](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the boundaries of the System Management Application Process (SMAP). At the top, a box is divided into 'People' and 'Software'. Below this box is a dashed line labeled 'Local interface'. A double-headed arrow connects the 'Local interface' to a large box labeled 'System management application process'. Inside this box, there is a dashed line labeled 'SMSI' (Service Management Service Interface). Below the 'SMSI' line is a box labeled 'SMAE' (System Management Application Entity). Below the 'SMAE' box is a box labeled 'LME' (Layer Management Entity). A double-headed arrow connects the 'LME' box to the 'SMSI' line. Below the 'LME' box is a box labeled 'LMSI' (Layer Management Service Interface). A double-headed arrow connects the 'LMSI' box to the 'SMSI' line. The 'LMSI' box is also connected to the 'SMSI' line by a line labeled 'T1115750-88'. The 'LMSI' box is also connected to the 'SMSI' line by a line labeled 'Communications component'. + +Diagram of SMAP boundaries showing the relationship between People/Software, SMAP, and the Communications component. + +**FIGURE 4/Q.940** +**SMAP Boundaries** + +This Figure shows the relationship between the SMAP and two other major components. The Communications component contains the seven layers of the reference model. The people and software component contains the people/software in the local environment that use the local systems manager. + +The SMAE is the system management application entity, and (N)-LME represents the layer managers in the system. + +##### 5.1.2.1 Local interface + +The local interface is located between the SMAP and the people and software that request services from the SMAP. Service request/responses pass through this boundary to invoke one or more system management functions. Local interfaces, when present, are beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +##### 5.1.2.2 Layer management service interface (LMSI) + +The Layer Management Service Interface is the boundary between the SMAP and the individual layer management [(N)-LMEs]. Data and control information pass through this boundary. The boundary provides a way for each layer manager to gain access to parameters within the scope of that layer. This service interface is not subject to standardization. + +###### 5.1.2.2.1 *From system management to layer management* + +The boundary between system management and (N)-layer management supports the flow from system management to layer management of: + +- 1) requests to read, set, and perform actions with respect to various values, counters, statuses, etc., within a given layer; +- 2) response to inquiries made by an (N)-layer management entity upon the system management function; +- 3) data from the (N)-layer management of other systems. + +###### 5.1.2.2.2 *From layer management to system management* + +The boundaries between system management and (N)-layer management supports the flow from (N)-layer management to system management of: + +- 1) responses to read, set and request for action that came from system management; +- 2) request to send data to (N)-layer management in another system; +- 3) requests to place data into the Management Information Base; +- 4) requests to obtain information from the Management Information Base. + +##### 5.1.2.3 **system management service interface (SMSI)** + +The System Management Service Interface is the boundary between the SMAP and the SMAE. The SMAE is a type of application entity which communicates system management messages to its peer SMAE in another system. Data and control information to and from the SMAE pass through this boundary. A service definition defines this boundary, and this service boundary defines system management. + +#### 5.1.3 *System management functions* + +The responsibilities of system management are considered from two points of view: + +- a) Local system responsibilities (included for completeness of description): + - to initiate the (N)-layer manager for each layer, upon system activation; + - to serve as the manager of information that is common to several layers or that is supplied externally. +- b) Communications responsibilities: + - to provide support for the exchange of information between the (N)-LMEs of a single layer so that the (N)-LMEs do not need to provide separate protocols for such exchanges; + - to coordinate the activities of the various SMAPs within telecommunication networks and subscriber installations. + +#### 5.1.4 *Relationship to (N)-layer management* + +System management provides the only vehicle for the exchange of information between layers. Direct communication of management information between layers is deliberately precluded in the reference model to prevent inter-layer dependencies from occurring. + +Since inter-layer exchanges of information will have to occur (i.e., error statistics), system management has been designated as the vehicle through which this exchange will occur. Each layer will have defined sets of information it may make known or will need to acquire. + +System management implements the means of acquiring and disseminating this information. This may require activities on the part of system management that span several systems. + +System management maintains the MIB and provides the support of (N)-LME access to the MIB. + +#### 5.1.5 *Relationship to the Management Information Base* + +The SMAP is responsible for the MIB and provides authorized access to the MIB across the system boundaries. + +### 5.2 *Layer management* + +This section introduces the concept of layer management and its relationships to other entities. + +#### 5.2.1 *Scope* + +In keeping with the general principle that each layer is independent of all others, each layer has its own management functions. These layer management functions are described in this Recommendation as the (N)-LME. + +The role of the (N)-LME is threefold. Firstly, it serves to coordinate the activities of the (N)-entities within the layer. Secondly, it serves as the "window" to system management for the entities within the layer. Thirdly, in conjunction with both system management and its peer LMEs it manages the layer. + +The (N)-LMEs are restricted to activities within an (N)-layer. The (N)-LME must not interact directly with a layer manager of any other layer. + +#### 5.2.2 *Relationship to (N)-entities which operate protocols* + +The (N)-LME is charged with coordinating the activities and relationships of various (N)-entities which operate the protocols within the layer. + +The (N)-LME is responsible for accessing the MIB on behalf of the (N)-entities. It will access the MIB to retrieve external parameters that the (N)-entity will need to operate, and to store and retrieve operating data that is in external storage contained within the scope of the peer management entity. The (N)-LME is also the focus for control of the (N)-entities by system management. + +#### 5.2.3 *Relationship between peer (N)-LMEs* + +The (N)-LMEs will frequently need to exchange information. This exchange ordinarily will be accomplished through the peer SMAPs. However, in some cases, layer management protocols are necessary. These cases are limited to the following: + +- 1) where the exchange of information, or the circumstances under which such information might be exchanged would necessarily interfere with the support of the SMAE by the lower layers: for example, loop testing at layer 1 might be supported by a layer 1 management protocol, and exchange of routing information might be supported by a layer 3 management protocol; +- 2) where layer management protocols already exist; for example, see Recommendation Q.921. + +In no event may a layer management protocol interact directly with any other layer. System management provides the only means for data transfer. + +#### 5.2.4 *Relationship to system management* + +The (N)-LMEs rely upon services from system management for three purposes. These are to provide communication for intra-layer management activities, to coordinate inter-layer management activities and to serve as a general repository for management information. + +As system management is the supervisor for any action on layer management, the service request/response for external action (e.g., parameter manipulation, statistic gathering, etc.,) will use the SMAP as defined in § 6.1. + +### 5.3 *Protocol processing for management purposes* + +#### 5.3.1 *Scope* + +On occasion, the (N)-entities do participate in the management process. This occurs when the protocol has embedded within itself information that must be made known to other entities and when events occur that must be made known to other entities. + +#### 5.3.2 *Relationship of (N)-entities to (N)-LMEs* + +The (N)-entities rely upon the (N)-LME to provide coordination between the various (N)-entities in the (N)-layer, and access to data and services that come from outside the (N)-layer. There is, therefore, a flow of control information between the (N)-entities and the (N)-LME. + +Since the (N)-entities exist independently of the other (N)-entities within the (N)-layer, they are dependent upon the (N)-LME to coordinate activities between the various (N)-entities within the sub-system. As an example the (N)-entities rely upon the (N)-LME to determine when requests for connection are being made to establish the association between the connection request at a connection endpoint and the (N)-entity. The (N)-LME also controls the instantiation of (N)-entities at the time of connection requests. + +## 6 **Overview of services required by the SMAP** + +### 6.1 *High layer context management* + +When the two SMAPs are involved in a management dialogue, they may want to establish a context that will be maintained during the life of the dialogue. In this sense two SMAPs typically work in a connection-oriented mode. The SMAE will provide services that will allow it to work in connection-oriented mode by providing the capability to establish and release associations between peer applications. + +These services are to be described further in future Recommendations. + +The use of a connectionless service is for further study. + +### 6.2 *Definition of a set of generic functions* + +As presented in § 5, management covers a large spectrum of applications. These applications may be implemented by dedicated SMAPs that can make use of a reduced set of generic functions. The generic functions are listed hereafter with examples for their use: + +- Trigger an action (e.g., activate or deactivate loopbacks or internal tests); +- Event report (e.g., error reporting, alarm reporting); +- Get attributes (e.g., cumulative error counters, get parameter values); +- Set attributes (e.g., set or modify parameters, thresholds, etc.); +- Create and delete managed objects (e.g., create a routing table). + +The SMAE provides facilities to allow the generic functions to be communicated between SMAPs. + +## 7 **Addressing for information exchange** + +The information flow takes place between two SMAPs and the originator must be able to address the destination SMAP. + +Depending upon the location of the communicating SMAPs different addressing schemes may apply: + +- 1) Explicit Addressing. In this case the remote entity is explicitly addressed by its ISDN address. + +- 2) Implicit Addressing. Implicit addressing relies on mechanisms other than an explicit address in the maintenance message to identify the recipient of the information. + +For system management two cases of implicit addressing may be identified: + +- a) permanent connections; +- b) hot line service. + +## **8 Terminal selection** + +In addition to the normal ISDN addressing mechanisms the maintenance procedures which require actions to perform to particular user equipment require the existence of an identification method that allows access to the unique piece of user equipment to be maintained. + +Selection of a unique terminal is based on compatibility checking of various parameters. Compatibility is determined first on the basis of the ISDN address and then on the basis of service information (bearer capability, high layer compatibility, etc.). The service information alone is adequate to provide unique identification if a single unit of equipment satisfies this requirement. + +When several TEs connected to the same access, sharing one ISDN address, provide the same functionality, and neither the NSAP nor service information are sufficient, then a unique equipment identifier must be used. + +## **9 Access control** + +In many cases information accessible through the management function may be private or a management action may result in taking the equipment out of service. Access security to management and maintenance functions must, therefore, be provided. + +Access controls may be applied both to the call establishment phase of the maintenance call and also within individual maintenance transactions. + +The use of Calling Line Identity provides one method by which maintenance calls can be screened. Further access right discrimination can be performed on the basis of message type in which the management information is carried. Each message type may have its own implied access rights. + +Additionally, specific access control can be performed on the basis of an explicit access control parameter. This parameter has the following characteristics: + +- 1) access control mechanisms are defined as parameters of the primitives passed between system management and the service provider; +- 2) use of access control parameters is optional; +- 3) in addition to meeting compatibility requirements, management calls must also satisfy the access control requirements; +- 4) access control information may be encrypted. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28fd5a3b873cda6e70e9af627ef16717162228e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dcbf8c34e850f359544b7d0b829f979102070c3153974105c6cb3da030b41730 +size 8240 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/d0c9888da9078a08d93712fd0e113a88_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/d0c9888da9078a08d93712fd0e113a88_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fce82db4422185e03a83f649952ccf7f7f501f89 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/d0c9888da9078a08d93712fd0e113a88_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d83e061a96c6b76a7fa2dd3d07ef644ee7480a80ef560a16ef0731ce4cf5c7f8 +size 29821 diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6222ee94e0405a74ae1e124d518cfb853bf708ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.953.4-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,494 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## Q.953 + +(10/95) + +**DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING +SYSTEM No. 1** + +--- + +**INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK +(ISDN) – STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR CALL +COMPLETION SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES +USING DSS 1** + +**Clause 4 – Terminal Portability (TP)** + +**ITU-T Recommendation Q.953** + +(Previously “CCITT Recommendation”) + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation Q.953, clause 4, was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 17th of October 1995. + +# --- NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +© ITU 1996 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 4 | Terminal portability (TP) ..... | 1 | +| | 4.1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| | 4.2 References..... | 1 | +| | 4.3 Definitions ..... | 2 | +| | 4.4 Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| | 4.5 Description..... | 3 | +| | 4.6 Operational requirements..... | 3 | +| | 4.6.1 Provision/withdrawal ..... | 3 | +| | 4.6.2 Requirements on the originating network side..... | 3 | +| | 4.6.3 Requirements on the destination network side..... | 3 | +| | 4.7 Coding requirements..... | 3 | +| | 4.8 State definitions ..... | 3 | +| | 4.9 Signalling procedures at the coincident S and T reference point..... | 3 | +| | 4.9.1 Invocation and operation..... | 3 | +| | 4.10 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs ..... | 3 | +| | 4.11 Interaction with other networks ..... | 4 | +| | 4.11.1 Interactions with non-ISDNs ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12 Interaction with other supplementary services ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.1 Call Waiting..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.2 Explicit Call Transfer..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.7 Closed User Group..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.8 Conference Calling ..... | 4 | +| | 4.12.9 Direct-Dialling-In ..... | 5 | +| | 4.12.10 Call Diversion (Call Forwarding) services ..... | 5 | +| | 4.12.11 Line Hunting ..... | 5 | +| | 4.12.12 Three-Party service ..... | 5 | +| | 4.12.13 User-to-User Signalling ..... | 5 | +| | 4.12.14 Multiple Subscriber Number..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.15 Call Hold..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.16 Advice Of Charge ..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.17 Sub-addressing ..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.18 Terminal Portability ..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber ..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.20 Malicious Call Identification..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.21 Reverse Charging..... | 6 | +| | 4.12.22 Multi-level Precedence and Preemption ..... | 7 | +| | 4.12.23 Support of Private Numbering Plans ..... | 7 | +| | 4.12.24 International Telecommunication Charge Card ..... | 7 | +| | 4.12.25 Global virtual network services ..... | 7 | +| | 4.13 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 7 | +| | 4.14 Dynamic description (SDLs) ..... | 7 | +| | Appendix I – Signalling flows..... | 7 | + +# **SUMMARY** + +This Recommendation defines the operation of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) for the support of the Terminal Portability (TP) supplementary service at the T or the coincident S and T reference point of the User-to-Network Interface of the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN). + +The Terminal Portability supplementary service allows the user to temporarily suspend an active call, and subsequently reactivate it from the same terminal equipment or from another one within the same user-network interface. + +# **INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) – STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR CALL COMPLETION SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1** + +*(Geneva, 1995)* + +# **4 Terminal portability (TP)** + +## **4.1 Scope** + +This Recommendation specifies the stage three of the Terminal Portability (TP) supplementary service for the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) at the T reference point or coincident S and T reference point (as defined in Recommendation I.411 [1]) by means of the Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1). Stage three identifies the protocol procedures and switching functions needed to support a telecommunications service (see Recommendation I.130 [2]). + +In addition, this Recommendation specifies the protocol requirements at the T reference point where the service is provided to the user via a private ISDN. + +This Recommendation does not specify the additional protocol requirements where the service is provided to the user via a telecommunications network that is not an ISDN. + +Terminal Portability is a supplementary service that allows the user during the Active call state of a call: + +- to suspend the call and to reactivate it subsequently at the same terminal; or +- to move one terminal from one socket to another within one given basic access; or +- to move one call from one terminal to another terminal within one given basic access. + +The portability of a terminal during the Null call state is part of the basic access capabilities and does not require any procedure. + +The portability of a terminal in the call establishment and in the call clearing phases is not possible. + +It is a user's responsibility to resume the call with a terminal which is compatible both with the remote terminal and the type of connection previously established. + +The TP supplementary service is applicable to all circuit-switched telecommunication services requiring the attendance of a human being, such as telephony, videotelephony, etc. + +The TP supplementary service does not apply to non-interactive services such as facsimile, teletex, mixed-mode, computer communication, etc. However, the network will not take any action to its applicability. + +Further part(s) of this Recommendation shall specify the method of testing required to identify conformance to this Recommendation. + +This Recommendation is applicable to equipment, supporting the TP supplementary service, to be attached at either side of a T reference point or coincident S and T reference points when used as an access to the public ISDN. + +## **4.2 References** + +The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore + +encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- [1] ITU-T Recommendation I.411 (1993), *ISDN user-network interfaces – Reference configurations*. +- [2] CCITT Recommendation I.130 (1988), *Method for the characterization of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and network capabilities of an ISDN*. +- [3] ITU-T Recommendation clause 2/Q.954 (1993), *Stage 3 service description for multiparty supplementary services using DSS 1 – Three-Party service*. +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation clause 2/Q.956 (1995), *Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) – Stage 3 service description for charging supplementary services using DSS 1 – Advice Of Charge*. +- [5] CCITT Recommendation I.253 (1988), *Call completion supplementary services*. +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (1993), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control*. +- [7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.920 (1993), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN user-network interface data link layer – General aspects*. +- [8] ITU-T Recommendation clause 1/Q.957 (1993), *Stage 3 description for additional information transfer supplementary services using DSS 1 – User-to-User Signalling (UUS)*. + +## 4.3 Definitions + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following definitions apply: + +**4.3.1 connection endpoint identifier (CEI):** See 3.4.1/Q.920 [7]. + +**4.3.2 location interaction:** An interaction of the protocol for two or more supplementary services where the served user (of all supplementary services) is on the same access. + +**4.3.3 local interaction for the CEI:** The calls for which the local interaction exists are at the same access and are identified by the same CEI. + +**4.3.4 local interaction for the call:** The local interaction exists on a single call, i.e. both supplementary services are invoked by the same call. + +**4.3.5 network:** The DSS 1 protocol entity at the network side of the user-network interface. + +**4.3.6 no impact:** The interaction between the two identified supplementary services contains no requirements for the protocol over and above the requirements of the Recommendation for each individual supplementary service. + +NOTE – Other aspects of interactions that do not affect the DSS 1 protocol are covered in the service description of the relevant supplementary service. + +**4.3.7 not applicable:** The interaction between the two identified supplementary services is outside the scope of this Recommendation, e.g. the interaction is between the supplementary service and itself, and is therefore covered in the Recommendation for the individual supplementary service. + +**4.3.8 remote interaction:** An interaction of the protocol for two or more supplementary services where one user is the served user for one supplementary service and (for the same call) the remote user for another supplementary service. The interaction for the served user's supplementary service exists at the remote user. + +**4.3.9 remote user:** The DSS 1 protocol entity at the user side of the user-network interface which is involved in an instance of this supplementary service, but which has no control of it. + +**4.3.10 user:** The DSS 1 protocol entity at the user side of the user-network interface. + +## **4.4 Abbreviations** + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following abbreviations are used: + +| | | +|-------|--------------------------------------------| +| CEI | Connection Endpoint Identifier | +| DSS 1 | Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| TP | Terminal Portability | + +## **4.5 Description** + +The general description of the TP supplementary service is specified in clause 4/I.253 [5]. + +The procedures make use of the suspend and resume functions as described in Recommendation Q.931 [6]. + +## **4.6 Operational requirements** + +### **4.6.1 Provision/withdrawal** + +This supplementary service may be provided by a prior arrangement with the service provider or may be generally available. Withdrawal shall be at the request of the customer or for administrative reasons. + +### **4.6.2 Requirements on the originating network side** + +The procedures according to 5.6/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +### **4.6.3 Requirements on the destination network side** + +The procedures according to 5.6/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +## **4.7 Coding requirements** + +All parameters or parameter values required for the TP supplementary service are specified in Recommendation Q.931 [6]. If the user provides IA5 characters in the Call identity information element, these shall be encoded with bit eight of octet three set to "0". + +## **4.8 State definitions** + +The states associated with basic call control according to clause 2/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +## **4.9 Signalling procedures at the coincident S and T reference point** + +### **4.9.1 Invocation and operation** + +#### **4.9.1.1 Normal operation** + +For call suspension, 5.6.1/Q.931 and 5.6.2/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +For call re-establishment, 5.6.4/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +#### **4.9.1.2 Exceptional procedures** + +In addition to the situations listed below, the normal error handling procedures according to 5.8/Q.931 [6] shall apply: + +- for call suspend error, 5.6.3/Q.931 [6] shall apply; +- for call resume errors, 5.6.5/Q.931 [6] shall apply; +- for call double suspension, 5.6.6/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +## **4.10 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs** + +The procedures of 5.6.7/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +## **4.11 Interaction with other networks** + +### **4.11.1 Interactions with non-ISDNs** + +No impact on the protocol. + +## **4.12 Interaction with other supplementary services** + +The following principle applies for the interaction of the TP supplementary service with other supplementary services, if the remote network or the remote user send a NOTIFY message during the suspension phase of a call, then the network of the suspending user shall discard this message. + +### **4.12.1 Call Waiting** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.2 Explicit Call Transfer** + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +### **4.12.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.7 Closed User Group** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.8 Conference Calling** + +#### **4.12.8.1 The served user of the Conference supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +##### **4.12.8.1.1 Normal operation** + +No impact. + +NOTE – The invocation of the TP supplementary service is not allowed for the served user of the Conference supplementary service. + +##### **4.12.8.1.2 Exceptional procedures** + +If, within the TP supplementary service, the network refuses a request to suspend a call because the call is part of a conference controlled by the same served user (local interaction for the call), or because another call for that CEI is part of a conference for which the served user is located at that CEI (local interaction for the CEI), the SUSPEND REJECT message shall contain cause value #29 “facility rejected”. + +#### **4.12.8.2 The remote user of the Conference supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +##### **4.12.8.2.1 Normal operation** + +If, during operation of the Conference supplementary service, a remote user uses the TP supplementary service (remote interaction), then notifications concerning the TP supplementary service shall be sent to the controller of the Conference supplementary service as specified in 1.6.8/Q.954 [3], i.e. the PartyId of the suspending user is included. + +##### **4.12.8.2.2 Exceptional procedures** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.9 Direct-Dialling-In** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.10 Call Diversion (Call Forwarding) services** + +#### **4.12.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy** + +No impact. + +#### **4.12.10.2 Call Forwarding No Reply** + +No impact. + +#### **4.12.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional** + +No impact. + +#### **4.12.10.4 Call Deflection** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.11 Line Hunting** + +No access signalling requirements defined. + +### **4.12.12 Three-Party service** + +#### **4.12.12.1 The served user of the Three-Party supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +##### **4.12.12.1.1 Normal operation** + +No impact. + +NOTE – The invocation of the TP supplementary service is not allowed for the served user of the Three-Party supplementary service. + +##### **4.12.12.1.2 Exceptional procedures** + +If, within the TP supplementary service, the network refuses a request to suspend a call because the call is part of a three-way conversation controlled by the same served user (local interaction for the call), or because another call for that CEI is part of a three-way conversation controlled by the same served user (local interaction for the CEI), the SUSPEND REJECT message shall contain cause value #29 “facility rejected”. + +#### **4.12.12.2 The remote user of the Three-Party supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +##### **4.12.12.2.1 Normal operation** + +If, during operation of the Three-Party supplementary service, a remote user uses the TP supplementary service (remote interaction), then notifications concerning the TP supplementary service shall be sent as normal to the controller of the Three-Party supplementary service. + +##### **4.12.12.2.2 Exceptional procedures** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.13 User-to-User Signalling** + +#### **4.12.13.1 Service 1** + +No impact. + +#### **4.12.13.2 Service 2** + +No impact. + +#### **4.12.13.3 Service 3** + +See 1.6.18/Q.957.1 [8]. + +### **4.12.14 Multiple Subscriber Number** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.15 Call Hold** + +#### **4.12.15.1 The served user of the Call Hold supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +##### **4.12.15.1.1 Normal operation** + +No impact. + +NOTE – The invocation of the TP supplementary service is not allowed for the served user of the Call Hold supplementary service. + +##### **4.12.15.1.2 Exceptional procedures** + +If, within the TP supplementary service, the network refuses a request to suspend a call, e.g. because the call is in the Call Held auxiliary state (local interaction for the call), or because another call for that CEI is part of a Call Held auxiliary state (local interaction for the CEI), the SUSPEND REJECT message shall contain cause value #29 “facility rejected”. + +#### **4.12.15.2 Remote user of the HOLD supplementary service uses the TP supplementary service** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.16 Advice Of Charge** + +See 2.6.18/Q.956 [4]. + +### **4.12.17 Sub-addressing** + +No impact. + +### **4.12.18 Terminal Portability** + +Not applicable. + +### **4.12.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber** + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +### **4.12.20 Malicious Call Identification** + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +### **4.12.21 Reverse Charging** + +- *Case A and Case D* + +Not applicable. + +- *Case B (requested by the calling user)* + +If the user of the Reverse Charging supplementary service requests the TP supplementary service while the user’s network is in Reverse Charging request or Reverse Charging indication state, then the network shall reject this request by sending a SUSPEND REJECT message with cause value #29 “facility rejected” to the user. + +If the destination network of the user who has activated the TP supplementary service receives a request for the Reverse Charging supplementary service from the originating network, then the destination network rejects this request by sending a FACILITY message with the Return error value “supplementaryServiceInteractionNotAllowed” to the calling user. + +- *Case B (requested by the called user) and Case C* + +If the called user requests the Reverse Charging supplementary service (Case B: requested by the called user or Case C) while the calling user has suspended the call, then the calling user's network shall discard the notification of Reverse Charging to the calling user. + +### 4.12.22 Multi-level Precedence and Preemption + +No impact. + +### 4.12.23 Support of Private Numbering Plans + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +### 4.12.24 International Telecommunication Charge Card + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +### 4.12.25 Global virtual network services + +No applicable interaction at this time. + +## 4.13 Parameter values (timers) + +The following timers as specified in clause 9/Q.931 [6] shall be relevant in the context of the TP supplementary service: + +- user timer T319; +- user timer T318; +- network timer T307. + +## 4.14 Dynamic description (SDLs) + +Annex A/Q.931 [6] shall apply. + +# Appendix I + +## Signalling flows + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +The signalling flows for normal procedures are shown in Figure 4-I.1. + +![Sequence diagram showing signalling flows for the successful invocation and completion of the TP supplementary service between User A, Network A, Network B, and User B.](d0c9888da9078a08d93712fd0e113a88_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant UA as User A + participant NA as Network A + participant NB as Network B + participant UB as User B + + UA->>NA: SUSPEND + NA-->>UA: SUSPEND ACK + UA->>NA: RESUME + NA-->>UA: RESUME ACK + NA->>NB: T317 + NB->>UB: NOTIFY + NB->>UB: NOTIFY + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the signalling flows for the successful invocation and completion of the TP supplementary service. It involves four entities: User A, Network A, Network B, and User B. The process begins with User A sending a 'SUSPEND' message to Network A, which responds with a 'SUSPEND ACK'. User A then sends a 'RESUME' message to Network A, which responds with a 'RESUME ACK'. Network A then sends a 'T317' message to Network B. Network B sends a 'NOTIFY' message to User B, and this is repeated once more. + +Sequence diagram showing signalling flows for the successful invocation and completion of the TP supplementary service between User A, Network A, Network B, and User B. + +FIGURE 4-I.1/Q.953 + +Successful invocation and completion of the TP supplementary service \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.957.1-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.957.1-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ef217a35c606f996aec24fcc6d998d1acd256f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.957.1-199607-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:247ac7e691d9b397de6c25536f4e75ec7745dc147c743ea9971188d8020f638a +size 8239 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.10-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.10-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53ccdd7ad3b98a69ff2bdb288c6637318b16e6a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.10-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,670 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**V.10** + +(03/93) + +# **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** --- + +# **ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR UNBALANCED DOUBLE-CURRENT INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS OPERATING AT DATA SIGNALLING RATES NOMINALLY UP TO 100 kbit/s** + +## **ITU-T Recommendation V.10** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation V.10 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XVII (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +# --- NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Introduction ..... | 1 | +| 2 Field of application ..... | 1 | +| 3 Symbolic representation of an interchange circuit ..... | 2 | +| 4 Generator polarities and receiver significant levels ..... | 2 | +| 4.1 Generator ..... | 2 | +| 4.2 Receiver ..... | 2 | +| 5 Generator..... | 3 | +| 5.1 Output impedance..... | 3 | +| 5.2 Static reference measurements..... | 4 | +| 5.3 Generator output rise-time measurement..... | 6 | +| 6 Load ..... | 7 | +| 6.1 Characteristics..... | 7 | +| 6.2 Receiver input voltage – Current measurements ..... | 7 | +| 6.3 DC input sensitivity measurements ..... | 7 | +| 6.4 Input balance test ..... | 8 | +| 7 Environmental constraints..... | 9 | +| 8 Circuit protection ..... | 9 | +| 9 Category 1 and category 2 receivers ..... | 10 | +| 10 Signal common return ..... | 11 | +| 11 Detection of generator power-off or circuit failure ..... | 12 | +| 12 Measurements at the physical interchange point..... | 12 | +| 12.1 Listing of essential measurements ..... | 12 | +| 12.2 Listing of optional measurements..... | 13 | +| Annex A – Compatibility with other interfaces..... | 13 | +| A.1 Compatibility of Recommendation V.10 and Recommendation V.11 interchange circuits in the same interface ..... | 13 | +| A.2 Recommendation V.10 interworking with Recommendation V.11 ..... | 13 | +| A.3 Recommendation V.10 interworking with Recommendation V.28..... | 13 | +| Annex B – Considerations for coaxial cable applications – V.10 COAXIAL ..... | 15 | +| Appendix I – Waveshaping ..... | 16 | +| Appendix II – Cable Guidelines ..... | 17 | +| Reference..... | 18 | + + + +# **ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR UNBALANCED DOUBLE-CURRENT INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS OPERATING AT DATA SIGNALLING RATES NOMINALLY UP TO 100 kbit/s1) 2)** + +*(Geneva, 1976; amended at Geneva, 1980, at Melbourne, 1988 and Helsinki, 1993)* + +# **1 Introduction** + +This Recommendation deals with the electrical characteristics of the generator, receiver and interconnecting leads of an unbalanced interchange circuit employing a differential receiver. + +In the context of this Recommendation an unbalanced interchange circuit is defined as consisting of an unbalanced generator connected to a receiver by an interconnecting lead and a common return lead. + +Annexes and appendices are provided to give guidance on a number of application aspects as follows: + +*Annex A* Compatibility with other interfaces + +*Annex B* Considerations for coaxial cable applications - V.10 COAXIAL + +*Appendix I* Waveshaping + +*Appendix II* Cable guidelines + +NOTE – Generator and load devices meeting the electrical characteristics of this Recommendation need not operate over the entire data signalling rate range specified. They may be designed to operate over narrower ranges to satisfy specific requirements more economically, particularly at lower data signalling rates. + +The interconnecting cable is normally not terminated, but the matter of terminating coaxial interconnecting cable is dealt with in Annex B. Where the interchange circuit incorporates the special provisions for coaxial applications with cable termination this shall be referred to as “complying with Recommendation V.10 (COAXIAL)”. + +Reference measurements are described which may be used to verify certain of the recommended parameters but it is a matter for individual manufacturers to decide what tests are necessary to ensure compliance with this Recommendation. + +# **2 Field of application** + +The electrical characteristics specified in this Recommendation apply to interchange circuits operating with data signalling rates up to 100 kbit/s. + +This Recommendation is not intended to apply to equipment implemented in discrete component technology, for which the electrical characteristics covered by Recommendation V.28 are more appropriate. + +Typical points of application are illustrated in Figure 1. + +Whilst the unbalanced interchange circuit is primarily intended for use at the lower data signalling rates, its use should be avoided in the following cases: + +- 1) where the interconnecting cable is too long for proper unbalanced circuit operation; +- 2) where extraneous noise sources make unbalanced circuit operation impossible; +- 3) where it is necessary to minimize interference with other signals. + +Whilst a restriction on maximum cable length is not specified, guidelines are given with respect to conservative operating distance as a function of data signalling rates (see Appendix II). + +--- + +1) This Recommendation is also designated as X.26 in the X-Series Recommendations. + +2) Signalling rates above the suggested 100 kbit/s may also be employed, but the maximum suggested operating distances should be shortened accordingly (see Figure II-1). + +![Diagram showing two typical applications of unbalanced interchange circuits. The top diagram shows a DTE connected to another DTE via a vertical connector. The bottom diagram shows a DTE connected to a DCE via a similar vertical connector. An arrow points from the text 'Circuits to this Recommendation' to the connector in the bottom diagram. The reference 'T1400040-93/d01' is at the bottom right.](547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg) + +T1400040-93/d01 + +Diagram showing two typical applications of unbalanced interchange circuits. The top diagram shows a DTE connected to another DTE via a vertical connector. The bottom diagram shows a DTE connected to a DCE via a similar vertical connector. An arrow points from the text 'Circuits to this Recommendation' to the connector in the bottom diagram. The reference 'T1400040-93/d01' is at the bottom right. + +FIGURE 1/V.10 +Typical applications of unbalanced interchange circuits + +# 3 Symbolic representation of an interchange circuit + +See Figure 2. + +For data transmission applications, it is commonly accepted that the interface cabling is provided by the DTE. This introduces the line of demarcation between the DTE plus cable and the DCE. This line is also called the interchange point and physically implemented in the form of a connector. The applications also require interchange circuits in both directions. This leads to an illustration as shown in Figure 3. + +# 4 Generator polarities and receiver significant levels + +## 4.1 Generator + +The signal conditions for the generator are specified in terms of the voltage between output points A and C shown in Figure 2. + +When the signal condition 0 (space) for data circuits, or ON for control and timing circuits, is transmitted the output point A is positive with respect to point C. When the signal condition 1 (mark) for data circuits, or OFF for control and timing circuits, is transmitted the output point A is negative with respect to point C. + +## 4.2 Receiver + +The receiver significant levels are shown in Table 1, where $V_{A'}$ and $V_{B'}$ are respectively the voltage at points A' and B' relative to point C'. + +![Symbolic representation of an unbalanced interchange circuit. The diagram shows a Generator (G) connected to an Interconnecting cable, which is then connected to a Load. The Generator has an active interchange point (A) and a common return point (C). The Load has an active interchange point (A') and a common return point (B'). A Receiver (R) is connected to the Load. A cable termination resistor (Zt) is shown between A' and B'. The signal conductor is labeled 'Signal conductor' and the signal common return is labeled 'Signal common return'. The generator output voltage is Vac and the ground potential difference is Vg. The diagram is labeled T1400050-93/d02.](fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg) + +Symbolic representation of an unbalanced interchange circuit. The diagram shows a Generator (G) connected to an Interconnecting cable, which is then connected to a Load. The Generator has an active interchange point (A) and a common return point (C). The Load has an active interchange point (A') and a common return point (B'). A Receiver (R) is connected to the Load. A cable termination resistor (Zt) is shown between A' and B'. The signal conductor is labeled 'Signal conductor' and the signal common return is labeled 'Signal common return'. The generator output voltage is Vac and the ground potential difference is Vg. The diagram is labeled T1400050-93/d02. + +\* This terminating resistor is only used with "V.10-COAXIAL", see Annex B. + +- $V_{ac}$ Generator output voltage +- $V_g$ Ground potential difference +- $Z_t$ Cable termination impedance +- A Generator active interchange point +- C Generator common return point +- A' Load active interchange point +- B' Load common return point +- C' Receiver zero reference point + +#### NOTES + +- 1 Two interchange points are shown. The output characteristics of the generator, excluding any interconnecting cable, are defined at the "generator interchange point". The electrical characteristics to which the receiver must respond are defined at the "load interchange point". +- 2 The connection of the signal common return is dealt with in 10 below. Points C and C' may be connected to protective ground if required by national regulations. +- 3 The interconnecting cable is normally not terminated. The termination of coaxial interconnecting cable is dealt with in Annex B. + +FIGURE 2/V.10 + +# **Symbolic representation of an unbalanced interchange circuit** + +# 5 Generator3) + +## 5.1 Output impedance + +The total dynamic output impedance of the generator shall be equal to or less than 50 ohms. + +3) For test purposes other than specified in this Recommendation (e.g. signal quality measurement), a transmitter test load of 450 ohms may be used. + +![Figure 3/V.10: Practical representation of the interface. This schematic diagram shows the electrical connections between a DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) and a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) across a connector. The DTE side (left) includes a generator (G) and a receiver (R). The DCE side (right) includes a receiver (R) and a generator (G). A vertical dashed line represents the 'Line of demarcation' at the connector. Points A' and B' are on the top line, and points A, C, and C' are on the bottom line. The diagram labels 'DTE common return', 'DCE common return', and 'Signal ground'. Ground symbols are shown for 'DTE and cable' and 'DCE', both with a reference to 'See Note 2'. A reference to 'See Note 3' is also present near the connector.](3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg) + +Figure 3/V.10: Practical representation of the interface. This schematic diagram shows the electrical connections between a DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) and a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) across a connector. The DTE side (left) includes a generator (G) and a receiver (R). The DCE side (right) includes a receiver (R) and a generator (G). A vertical dashed line represents the 'Line of demarcation' at the connector. Points A' and B' are on the top line, and points A, C, and C' are on the bottom line. The diagram labels 'DTE common return', 'DCE common return', and 'Signal ground'. Ground symbols are shown for 'DTE and cable' and 'DCE', both with a reference to 'See Note 2'. A reference to 'See Note 3' is also present near the connector. + +T1400060-93/d03 + +#### NOTES + +- 1 The zero volt reference interchange points C' may be interconnected via the signal ground conductor. +- 2 Signal ground may be further connected to external protective ground if national regulations require. +- 3 The type of connector with this electrical characteristic specification depends on the application. ISO specifies, for data transmission over telephone type facilities, a 37-pin connector in ISO 4902. + +FIGURE 3/V.10 +Practical representation of the interface + +TABLE 1/V.10 +Receiver significant levels + +| | $V_{A'} - V_{B'} \leq -0.3 \text{ V}$ | $V_{A'} - V_{B'} \geq +0.3 \text{ V}$ | +|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| Data circuits | 1 | 0 | +| Control and timing circuits | OFF | ON | + +### 5.2 Static reference measurements + +The generator characteristics are specified in accordance with measurements illustrated in Figure 4 and described in 5.2.1 to 5.2.4. + +#### 5.2.1 Open circuit measurement + +See Figure 4a). + +The open circuit voltage measurement is made with a 3900-ohm resistor connected between points A and C. In both binary states, the magnitude of the signal voltage ( $V_0$ ) shall be equal to or greater than 4.0 volts but not greater than 6.0 volts. + +#### 5.2.2 Test termination measurement + +See Figure 4b). + +With a test load of 450 ohms connected between output points A and C, the magnitude of the output voltage ( $V_t$ ) in both binary states shall be equal to or greater than 0.9 of the magnitude of $V_0$ . + +#### 5.2.3 Short-circuit measurement + +See Figure 4c). + +With the output points A and C short-circuited the current ( $I_s$ ) flowing through point A in both binary states shall not exceed 150 milliamperes. + +#### 5.2.4 Power-off measurements + +See Figure 4d). + +Under power-off condition, with a voltage ranging between +0.25 volt and -0.25 volt applied between the output point A and point C, the magnitude of the output leakage current ( $I_x$ ) shall not exceed 100 microamperes. + +![Figure 4/V.10: Generator parameter reference measurements. The diagram shows four test configurations (a, b, c, d) for a generator G with output points A and C. A vertical bracket on the left indicates 'Steady-state logic input (1 or 0)'.](2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg) + +Steady-state logic input (1 or 0) + +a) Open-circuit measurement + $4.0 \text{ volts} \leq |V_0| \leq 6.0 \text{ volts}$ + +b) Test termination measurement + $|V_t| \geq 0.9 * |V_0|$ $R_t = 450^* \text{ ohms}$ +\* For coaxial cable applications, see Annex B. + +c) Short-circuit measurement + $|I_s| < 150 \text{ mA}$ + +d) Power-off measurement + $|I_x| < 100 \mu\text{A}$ + $\pm 0.25 \text{ V}$ + +T1400070-93/d04 + +Figure 4/V.10: Generator parameter reference measurements. The diagram shows four test configurations (a, b, c, d) for a generator G with output points A and C. A vertical bracket on the left indicates 'Steady-state logic input (1 or 0)'. + +FIGURE 4/V.10 +Generator parameter reference measurements + +## 5.3 Generator output rise-time measurement + +See Figure 5. + +![Diagram of generator output rise-time measurement setup and waveform.](7801d00a216dc4dc8a7d210dcb5fe3c5_img.jpg) + +The figure consists of two parts. The top part is a circuit diagram showing an input signal entering a block labeled 'G'. The output of 'G' is connected to point 'A'. A 450 Ω resistor is connected between point 'A' and point 'C'. A voltage source $V_{ss}$ is connected between point 'C' and ground. The bottom part is a waveform graph showing a signal transitioning between two steady states. The upper steady state is labeled 'Steady state "0"' and the lower is 'Steady state "1"'. The total voltage difference between these states is $V_{ss}$ . The signal transitions from '1' to '0' and back. The duration of the signal element is $t_b$ . The rise time $t_r$ is defined as the time for the signal to rise from 0.1 $V_{ss}$ to 0.9 $V_{ss}$ . The graph shows $t_{r+}$ for the rising edge and $t_{r-}$ for the falling edge. The signal levels during the transition are marked as $\pm 0.1 V_{ss}$ . The reference T1400080-93/d05 is noted at the bottom right of the graph. + +$V_{ss}$ Voltage difference between steady state signal conditions + +$t_b$ Nominal duration of the test signal element + $100 \mu s \leq t_r \leq 300 \mu s$ when $t_b \geq 1$ ms + $0.1 t_b \leq t_r \leq 0.3 t_b$ when $t_b < 1$ ms + +T1400080-93/d05 + +Diagram of generator output rise-time measurement setup and waveform. + +FIGURE 5/V.10 +Generator output rise-time measurement + +#### 5.3.1 Waveform + +The measurement will be made with a resistor of 450 ohms connected between points A and C. A test signal, with a nominal signal element duration $t_b$ and composed of alternate ones and zeros, shall be applied to the input. The change in amplitude of the output signal during transitions from one binary state to the other shall be monotonic between 0.1 and 0.9 of $V_{ss}$ . + +#### 5.3.2 Waveshaping + +Waveshaping of the generator output signal shall be employed to control the level of interference (near-end crosstalk) which may be coupled to adjacent circuits in an interconnection. The rise time ( $t_r$ ) of the output signal shall be controlled to ensure the signal reaches 0.9 $V_{ss}$ between 0.1 and 0.3 of the duration of the unit interval ( $t_b$ ) at signalling rates greater than 1 kbit/s, and between 100 and 300 microseconds at signalling rates of 1 kbit/s or less. The method of waveshaping is not specified but examples are given in Appendix I. + +# 6 Load + +## 6.1 Characteristics + +The load consists of a receiver (R) as shown in Figure 2. The electrical characteristics of the receiver are specified in terms of the measurements illustrated in Figures 6, 7 and 8 and described in 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 below. A circuit meeting these requirements results in a differential receiver having a high input impedance, a small input threshold transition region between $-0.3$ and $+0.3$ volts differential, and allowance for an internal bias voltage not to exceed 3 volts in magnitude. + +The receiver is electrically identical to that specified for the balanced receiver in Recommendation V.11. + +## 6.2 Receiver input voltage – Current measurements + +See Figure 6. + +With the voltage $V_{ia}$ (or $V_{ib}$ ) ranging between $-10$ volts and $+10$ volts, while $V_{ib}$ (or $V_{ia}$ ) is held at 0 volt, the resultant input current $I_{ia}$ (or $I_{ib}$ ) shall remain within the shaded range shown in Figure 6. These measurements apply with the power supply of the receiver in both the power-on and power-off conditions. + +![Figure 6/V.10: Receiver input voltage-current measurements. Left: Circuit diagram showing a differential receiver R with inputs A' and B' and common C'. Input A' has voltage V_ia and current I_ia. Input B' has voltage V_ib and current I_ib. Right: Graph of current vs voltage. The x-axis (voltage) ranges from -10V to +10V with markers at -3V and +3V. The y-axis (current) has markers at -3.25mA and +3.25mA. A shaded region defines the valid operating range, forming a linear band passing through the origin.](72d357d406618f3f884c3876fc3058ee_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + subgraph Circuit + V_ia((V_ia)) --- I_ia((I_ia)) --- A'[A'] + V_ib((V_ib)) --- I_ib((I_ib)) --- B'[B'] + A' --- R{R} + B' --- R + C'[C'] --- R + end + +``` + +Figure 6/V.10: Receiver input voltage-current measurements. Left: Circuit diagram showing a differential receiver R with inputs A' and B' and common C'. Input A' has voltage V\_ia and current I\_ia. Input B' has voltage V\_ib and current I\_ib. Right: Graph of current vs voltage. The x-axis (voltage) ranges from -10V to +10V with markers at -3V and +3V. The y-axis (current) has markers at -3.25mA and +3.25mA. A shaded region defines the valid operating range, forming a linear band passing through the origin. + +FIGURE 6/V.10 + +### Receiver input voltage-current measurements + +## 6.3 DC input sensitivity measurements + +See Figure 7. + +Over the entire common-mode voltage ( $V_{cm}$ ) range of $+7$ volts to $-7$ volts, the receiver shall not require a differential input voltage ( $V_i$ ) of more than 300 millivolts to assume correctly the intended binary state. Reversing the polarity of $V_i$ shall cause the receiver to assume the opposite binary state. + +The maximum voltage (signal plus common-mode) present between either receiver input and receiver ground shall not exceed 10 volts nor cause the receiver to malfunction. The receiver shall tolerate a maximum differential voltage of 12 volts applied across its input terminals without being damaged. + +In the presence of the combinations of input voltages $V_{ia}$ and $V_{ib}$ specified in Figure 7, the receiver shall maintain the specified output binary state and shall not be damaged. + +**NOTE** – Designers of equipment should be aware that slow signal transitions with noise present may give rise to instability or oscillatory conditions in the receiving equipment; therefore, appropriate techniques should be implemented to prevent such behaviour. For example, adequate hysteresis may be incorporated in the receiver to prevent such conditions. + +![Circuit diagram for receiver input sensitivity measurement. A receiver block 'R' has three inputs: A', B', and C'. Input A' is connected to a voltage source V_ia. Input B' is connected to a voltage source V_ib. Input C' is connected to a voltage source V_i. The receiver has an 'Output' terminal. The diagram is labeled T1400100-93/d07.](d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg) + +Circuit diagram for receiver input sensitivity measurement. A receiver block 'R' has three inputs: A', B', and C'. Input A' is connected to a voltage source V\_ia. Input B' is connected to a voltage source V\_ib. Input C' is connected to a voltage source V\_i. The receiver has an 'Output' terminal. The diagram is labeled T1400100-93/d07. + +| Applied voltages | | Resulting input voltage $V_i$ | Output binary state | Purpose of measurement | +|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| $V_{ia}$ | $V_{ib}$ | | | | +| -12 V
0 V
+12 V
0 V | 0 V
-12 V
0 V
+12 V | -12 V
+12 V
+12 V
-12 V | (Not specified) | To ensure no damage to receiver inputs | +| +10 V
+ 4 V
-10 V
- 4 V | + 4 V
+10 V
- 4 V
-10 V | +6 V
-6 V
-6 V
+6 V | 0
1
1
0 | To guarantee correct operation at $V_i = 6$ V (maintain correct logic state) | +| 300 mV threshold measurement
----- | | | | | +| +0.30 V
0 V | 0 V
+0.30 V | +0.3 V
-0.3 V | 0
1 | } $V_{cm} = 0$ V | +| +7.15 V
+6.85 V | +6.85 V
+7.15 V | +0.3 V
-0.3 V | 0
1 | } $V_{cm} = +7$ V | +| -7.15 V
-6.85 V | -6.85 V
-7.15 V | -0.3 V
+0.3 V | 1
0 | } $V_{cm} = -7$ V | + +FIGURE 7/V.10 + +#### Receiver input sensitivity measurement + +## 6.4 Input balance test + +See Figure 8. + +The balance of the receiver input resistances and internal bias voltages shall be such that the receiver shall remain in the intended binary state under the conditions shown in Figure 8 and described as follows: + +- with $V_i = +720$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ varied between $-7$ and $+7$ volts; +- with $V_i = -720$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ varied between $-7$ and $+7$ volts; +- with $V_i = +300$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ a 1.5 volt peak-to-peak square wave at the highest applicable data signalling rate (this condition is provisional and subject to further study); +- with $V_i = -300$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ a 1.5 volt peak-to-peak square wave at the highest applicable data signalling rate (this condition is provisional and subject to further study). + +NOTE – The values of $V_i$ are provisional and are the subject of further study. + +![Circuit diagram for Receiver input balance test. A differential signal source consists of two series voltage sources, each labeled 1/2 V_i, connected in series. Each source is in series with a 500 Ω* resistor. The output terminals are labeled A' and B'. A common-mode voltage source V_cm is connected between the common ground and terminal C'. A receiver block labeled 'R' is connected between A', B', and C'. The diagram is labeled T1400110-93/d08.](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + subgraph Signal_Source + V1[1/2 Vi] + V2[1/2 Vi] + end + R1[500 Ω*] + R2[500 Ω*] + Vcm((Vcm)) + Rec[R] + + V1 --- R1 --- A'[A'] + V2 --- R2 --- B'[B'] + Vcm --- C'[C'] + A' --- Rec + B' --- Rec + C' --- Rec + +``` + +\* Matched. + +T1400110-93/d08 + +Circuit diagram for Receiver input balance test. A differential signal source consists of two series voltage sources, each labeled 1/2 V\_i, connected in series. Each source is in series with a 500 Ω\* resistor. The output terminals are labeled A' and B'. A common-mode voltage source V\_cm is connected between the common ground and terminal C'. A receiver block labeled 'R' is connected between A', B', and C'. The diagram is labeled T1400110-93/d08. + +FIGURE 8/V.10 +**Receiver input balance test** + +# 7 Environmental constraints + +In order to operate an unbalanced interchange circuit at data signalling rates ranging between 0 and 100 kbit/s, the following conditions apply: + +- 1) The total peak differential noise measured between the points A' and B' at the load interchange point (with the generator interchange point connected to a 50-ohm resistor substituted for the generator) shall not exceed the expected amplitude of the received signal minus 0.3 volts (provisional value). +- 2) The worst-case combination of generator-receiver ground potential difference ( $V_g$ , Figure 2) and longitudinally induced peak random noise voltage measured between the receiver points A' or B' and C' with the generator ends of the cable A and C joined together shall not exceed 4 volts. + +# 8 Circuit protection + +Unbalanced generator and load devices complying with this Recommendation shall not be damaged under the following conditions: + +- 1) generator open circuit; +- 2) short-circuit between the conductors of the interconnecting cable; +- 3) short-circuit between the conductors and Point C or C'. + +The above faults 2) and 3) might cause power dissipation in the interchange circuit devices to approach the maximum power dissipation that may be tolerated by a typical integrated circuit (IC) package. The user is therefore cautioned that where multiple generators and receivers are implemented in a single IC package, only one such fault per package might be tolerable at any one time without damage occurring. + +The user is also cautioned that the generator and receiver devices complying with this Recommendation might be damaged by spurious voltages applied between their input or output points and points C and C' (Figure 2). In those applications where the interconnecting cable may be inadvertently connected to other circuits or where it may be exposed to a severe electromagnetic environment, protection should be employed. + +# 9 Category 1 and category 2 receivers + +In order to provide flexibility in the choice of generator (V.10 or V.11), two categories of receiver are defined as follows: + +*Category 1* – Receivers shall have both input terminals A' and B' connected to individual terminals at the load interchange point, independent of all other receivers, as shown in Figure 9, and as applied in Figure A.1. + +*Category 2* – Receivers shall have one terminal connection for each A' input terminal at the load interchange point, and all B' input terminals shall be connected together within the DCE or DTE and shall be brought to one common B' input terminal as shown in Figure 10. + +The specification of the category to be used in any application is part of the appropriate DCE Recommendation, using this type of interface electrical characteristics. + +![Diagram illustrating the interconnection of signal common return for category 1 receivers. The diagram shows two main sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Communications Equipment) on the right. In the DTE section, there are two generators (G) and two receivers (R). The generators have terminals A and C, and the receivers have terminals A', B', and C'. The DCE section also has two receivers (R) with terminals A', B', and C'. The diagram shows signal conductors connecting the A terminals of the DTE generators to the A' terminals of the DCE receivers. A common signal common return is shown, which is connected to the C terminals of the DTE generators and the B' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram also shows a signal common return connected to the C' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram is labeled with 'Signal conductor', 'Signal common return', 'Circuit 102a', and 'Circuit 102b'. The reference T1400120-93/d09 is at the bottom right.](a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interconnection of signal common return for category 1 receivers. It shows two main sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Communications Equipment) on the right. In the DTE section, there are two generators (G) and two receivers (R). The generators have terminals A and C, and the receivers have terminals A', B', and C'. The DCE section also has two receivers (R) with terminals A', B', and C'. The diagram shows signal conductors connecting the A terminals of the DTE generators to the A' terminals of the DCE receivers. A common signal common return is shown, which is connected to the C terminals of the DTE generators and the B' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram also shows a signal common return connected to the C' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram is labeled with 'Signal conductor', 'Signal common return', 'Circuit 102a', and 'Circuit 102b'. The reference T1400120-93/d09 is at the bottom right. + +Diagram illustrating the interconnection of signal common return for category 1 receivers. The diagram shows two main sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Communications Equipment) on the right. In the DTE section, there are two generators (G) and two receivers (R). The generators have terminals A and C, and the receivers have terminals A', B', and C'. The DCE section also has two receivers (R) with terminals A', B', and C'. The diagram shows signal conductors connecting the A terminals of the DTE generators to the A' terminals of the DCE receivers. A common signal common return is shown, which is connected to the C terminals of the DTE generators and the B' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram also shows a signal common return connected to the C' terminals of the DCE receivers. The diagram is labeled with 'Signal conductor', 'Signal common return', 'Circuit 102a', and 'Circuit 102b'. The reference T1400120-93/d09 is at the bottom right. + +FIGURE 9/V.10 + +Interconnection of signal common return for category 1 receivers + +![Diagram showing the interconnection of signal common return for category 2 receivers between DTE and DCE. The diagram is divided into two main sections by vertical dashed lines representing the interface. The left section is labeled 'DTE' and the right 'DCE'. In the DTE section, there are two unbalanced generators (G) at the top and two balanced receivers (R) below them. In the DCE section, there are two balanced receivers (R) at the top and two unbalanced generators (G) below them. Signal conductors connect terminal A of a generator to terminal A' of a receiver. A vertical line on the DTE side connects the C terminals of the generators and the B' terminals of the receivers to a common point grounded in the DTE. This line is labeled 'Signal common return' and 'Circuit 102a' as it crosses to the DCE side. On the DCE side, a similar vertical line connects the B' terminals of the receivers and the C terminals of the generators to a common point grounded in the DCE. This line is labeled 'Signal common return' and 'Circuit 102b' as it crosses to the DTE side. Terminals are labeled A, A', B', C, and C'. A reference number 'T1400130-93/d10' is at the bottom right.](33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing the interconnection of signal common return for category 2 receivers between DTE and DCE. The diagram is divided into two main sections by vertical dashed lines representing the interface. The left section is labeled 'DTE' and the right 'DCE'. In the DTE section, there are two unbalanced generators (G) at the top and two balanced receivers (R) below them. In the DCE section, there are two balanced receivers (R) at the top and two unbalanced generators (G) below them. Signal conductors connect terminal A of a generator to terminal A' of a receiver. A vertical line on the DTE side connects the C terminals of the generators and the B' terminals of the receivers to a common point grounded in the DTE. This line is labeled 'Signal common return' and 'Circuit 102a' as it crosses to the DCE side. On the DCE side, a similar vertical line connects the B' terminals of the receivers and the C terminals of the generators to a common point grounded in the DCE. This line is labeled 'Signal common return' and 'Circuit 102b' as it crosses to the DTE side. Terminals are labeled A, A', B', C, and C'. A reference number 'T1400130-93/d10' is at the bottom right. + +FIGURE 10/V.10 +**Interconnection of signal common return for category 2 receivers** + +# 10 Signal common return + +The interconnection between the generator and the load interchange points in Figure 2 shall consist of a signal conductor for each circuit and one signal common return for each direction as shown in Figures 9 and 10. Signal common return may be implemented by more than one lead, where required to accomplish interworking, as described in A.2 and as shown in Figure A.1. + +To minimize the effects of ground potential difference $V_g$ and longitudinally-coupled noise on the signal at the load interchange point, the signal common return shall be connected to ground only at the C terminal of the generator interchange point. For example, the B' terminal of all the receivers in DTE which interconnect with unbalanced generators in DCE shall connect to signal common return circuit 102b, which is connected to ground only in DCE. Signal common return circuit 102a is used to interconnect terminal B' of the receivers in DCE with the grounded terminal C of the unbalanced generators in DTE, as in Figures 9 and 10. + +# 11 Detection of generator power-off or circuit failure + +Certain applications require detection of various fault conditions in the interchange circuits, e.g.: + +- 1) generator power-off condition; +- 2) receiver not interconnected with a generator; +- 3) open-circuited interconnecting cable; +- 4) short-circuited interconnecting cable; +- 5) input signal to the load remaining within the transition region ( $\pm 300$ millivolts) for an abnormal period of time. + +When detection of one or more fault conditions is required by specific applications, additional provisions are required in the load and the following items must be determined: + +- a) which interchange circuits require fault detection; +- b) what faults must be detected; +- c) what action must be taken when a fault is detected, e.g. which binary state must the receiver assume? + +The interpretation of a fault condition by a receiver (or load) is application dependent. Each application may use a combination of the following classification: + +*Type 0* – No interpretation. A receiver or load does not have fault detection capability. + +*Type 1* – Data circuits assume a binary 1 state. Control and timing circuits assume an OFF condition. + +*Type 2* – Data circuits assume binary 0 state. Control and timing circuits assume an ON condition. + +*Type 3* – Special interpretation. The receiver or load provides a special indication for interpreting a fault condition. This special indication requires further study. + +The association of the circuit failure detection to particular interchange circuits in accordance with the above types is a matter of the functional and procedural characteristics specification of the interface. + +The interchange circuits monitoring circuit fault conditions in the general telephone network interfaces are indicated in Recommendation V.24. + +The interchange circuits monitoring circuit fault conditions in data network interfaces are indicated in Recommendation X.24 [1]. + +The receiver fault detection type required is specified in the relevant DCE Recommendations. + +# 12 Measurements at the physical interchange point + +The following information provides guidance for measurements when maintenance persons examine the interface for proper operation at the interchange point. + +## 12.1 Listing of essential measurements + +- open-circuit measurements; +- test-termination measurement; +- short-circuit measurement; +- generator output rise time; +- d.c. input sensitivity measurements. + +## **12.2 Listing of optional measurements** + +- the total generator resistance between points A and C shall be equal to or less than 50 ohms; +- power-off measurements; +- receiver input voltage space-space current measurements; +- input balance test; +- check of the required circuit fault detection (clause 11). + +The parameters defined in this Recommendation are not necessarily measurable at the physical interchange point. This is for further study. + +# **Annex A** + +## **Compatibility with other interfaces** + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +## **A.1 Compatibility of Recommendation V.10 and Recommendation V.11 interchange circuits in the same interface** + +The electrical characteristics of Recommendation V.10 are designed to allow the use of balanced (see Recommendation V.11) and unbalanced circuits within the same interface. For example, the balanced circuits may be used for data and timing whilst the unbalanced circuits may be used for associated control circuit functions. + +## **A.2 Recommendation V.10 interworking with Recommendation V.11** + +The differential receiver specifications of this Recommendation and Recommendation V.11 are electrically identical. It is therefore possible to interconnect an equipment using Recommendation V.10 receivers and generators on one side of the interface with an equipment using Recommendation V.11 generators and receivers on the other side of the interface. Such interconnection would result in interchange circuits according to Recommendation V.11 in one direction and interchange circuits according to this Recommendation in the other direction. Where such interworking is contemplated, the following technical considerations must be taken into account. + +**A.2.1** Interconnecting cable lengths are limited by performance of the circuits working to the Recommendation V.10 side of the interface. + +**A.2.2** The optional cable termination resistance ( $Z_t$ ), if implemented, in the equipment using Recommendation V.11 must be removed. + +**A.2.3** V.10-type receivers shall be of category 1 (see Figure A.1). + +## **A.3 Recommendation V.10 interworking with Recommendation V.28** + +The unbalanced electrical characteristics of this Recommendation have also been designed to permit limited interworking, under certain conditions, with generators and receivers to Recommendation V.28. Where such interworking is contemplated, the following technical limitations must be considered: + +**A.3.1** Separate DTE and DCE signal return paths will not be available at the Recommendation V.28 side of the interface. + +![Diagram illustrating the interconnection of signal common return by more than one conductor in order to accomplish interoperability of V.10 generators with category 1 receivers. The diagram shows two sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Communications Equipment) on the right. The DTE section contains two generators (G) and two receivers (R). The DCE section contains two receivers (R) and two generators (G). The signal conductors are labeled A, B, and C. The signal common return is labeled A', B', and C'. The diagram shows two different wiring configurations: Circuit 102a and Circuit 102b. In Circuit 102a, the signal conductors A, B, and C are connected to the receivers R in the DCE section. In Circuit 102b, the signal conductors A, B, and C are connected to the generators G in the DCE section. The signal common return conductors A', B', and C' are connected to the receivers R in the DTE section. The diagram also shows a ground connection for the signal common return.](76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg) + +Diagram illustrating the interconnection of signal common return by more than one conductor in order to accomplish interoperability of V.10 generators with category 1 receivers. The diagram shows two sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Communications Equipment) on the right. The DTE section contains two generators (G) and two receivers (R). The DCE section contains two receivers (R) and two generators (G). The signal conductors are labeled A, B, and C. The signal common return is labeled A', B', and C'. The diagram shows two different wiring configurations: Circuit 102a and Circuit 102b. In Circuit 102a, the signal conductors A, B, and C are connected to the receivers R in the DCE section. In Circuit 102b, the signal conductors A, B, and C are connected to the generators G in the DCE section. The signal common return conductors A', B', and C' are connected to the receivers R in the DTE section. The diagram also shows a ground connection for the signal common return. + +T1400140-93/d11 + +FIGURE A.1/V.10 + +**Interconnection of signal common return by more than one conductor in order to accomplish interoperability of V.10 generators with category 1 receivers** + +- A.3.2** Data signalling-rate limitations according to Recommendation V.28 shall apply. +- A.3.3** Interconnecting cable lengths are limited by the Recommendation V.28 performance restrictions. +- A.3.4** Probability of satisfactory operation will be enhanced by providing the maximum generator voltage possible on the Recommendation V.10 side of the interface within the limitations stipulated in this Recommendation. +- A.3.5** There may be equipment in the field where the V.28 type generators use potentials in excess of 12 volts and up to 25 volts. Where connection to this type of equipment is envisaged, adequate protection for the V.10 receivers is advised. +- A.3.6** Power-off detectors in Recommendation V.28 receivers may not necessarily work with Recommendation V.10 generators. + +# Annex B + +## Considerations for coaxial cable applications – V.10 COAXIAL4) + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +It is recognized that where coaxial cables are used for interconnecting purposes it may be desirable to include a terminating resistance at the receiver end of the cable. This is considered to be a special case for which special generator characteristics are required. The terminating resistance shall in no case be less than 50 ohms and the reference measurements under 5.2.2 and 5.3 shall be made with a 50-ohm test termination5). Use of this special application will require appropriate agreement with the proper authority. + +The alternative set of electrical characteristics applied in the coaxial cable case is the following. + +#### 5.2.2 *bis* Test termination measurement + +See Figure 4b). + +With a test load ( $R_t$ ) of 50 ohms connected between output points A and C, the magnitude of the output voltage ( $V_t$ ) shall be equal to or greater than 0.5 of the magnitude of $V_0$ . + +#### 5.3.1 *bis* Waveform + +See Figure 5. + +The measurement will be made with a resistor of 50 ohms connected between points A and C. A test signal, with a nominal signal element duration $t_b$ and composed of alternate ones and zeros, shall be applied to the input. The change in amplitude of the output signal during transitions from one binary state to the other shall be monotonic between 0.1 and 0.9 of $V_{ss}$ . + +#### 5.3.2 *bis* Waveshaping + +Waveshaping is not normally required for coaxial cable applications. + +### 10 *bis* Signal common return + +In applications where coaxial cables are used, the screen of the coaxial cable shall be connected to ground only at point C at the generator end as shown in Figure B.1. + +--- + +4) All the electrical characteristics specified in Recommendation V.10 other than those set down in this annex are applicable to the coaxial cable case with a cable case with a cable termination. + +5) For test purposes other than specified in this Recommendation (e.g. signal quality measurement), a transmitter test load of 50 ohms may be used. + +![Four circuit diagrams showing interconnection with coaxial cable between DTE and DCE. Each diagram shows a signal conductor (A) and a shield conductor (C). The DTE side has a generator (G) and the DCE side has a receiver (R). Termination impedance Zt is shown at the DCE end. The diagrams illustrate different grounding and termination configurations for the signal and shield conductors.](b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates four different interconnection configurations for a signal conductor (A) and a shield conductor (C) between a Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and a Data Communications Equipment (DCE) using a coaxial cable. +- The top two configurations show transmission from DTE to DCE. The generator (G) is at the DTE, and the receiver (R) is at the DCE. The signal conductor connects point A to A', and the shield conductor connects point C to B'. A termination impedance $Z_t$ is connected between A' and B'. In the first, the shield is grounded at the DTE. In the second, it is grounded at both ends. +- The bottom two configurations show transmission from DCE to DTE. The generator (G) is at the DCE, and the receiver (R) is at the DTE. The signal conductor connects point A to A', and the shield conductor connects point C to B'. A termination impedance $Z_t$ is connected between A' and B'. In the third, the shield is grounded at the DCE. In the fourth, it is grounded at both ends. + +T1400150-93/d12 + +Four circuit diagrams showing interconnection with coaxial cable between DTE and DCE. Each diagram shows a signal conductor (A) and a shield conductor (C). The DTE side has a generator (G) and the DCE side has a receiver (R). Termination impedance Zt is shown at the DCE end. The diagrams illustrate different grounding and termination configurations for the signal and shield conductors. + +$Z_t$ Optional termination impedance + +FIGURE B.1/V.10 +Interconnection with coaxial cable + +# Appendix I + +## Waveshaping + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +The required waveshaping may be accomplished either by providing a slew-rate control in the generator or by inserting an RC filter at the generator interchange point. A combination of these methods may also be employed. An example of the RC filter method is shown in Figure I.1. Typical values of capacitance $C_w$ , with the value of $R_w$ selected so that $R_w + R_d$ is approximately 50 ohms, are given for typical cable with an interconductor shunt capacitance of approximately 0.05 microfarads per kilometre. + +![Circuit diagram showing a generator G connected to a receiver R via an interconnecting cable. The generator output has a series resistor Rw and a shunt capacitor Cw connected to ground. The interconnecting cable is represented by dashed lines. The receiver R is connected to a destination D. A label T1400160-93/d13 is in the bottom right corner.](5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg) + +T1400160-93/d13 + +$R_d$ Generator internal resistance + $R_w$ 50 ohms – $R_d$ + +Circuit diagram showing a generator G connected to a receiver R via an interconnecting cable. The generator output has a series resistor Rw and a shunt capacitor Cw connected to ground. The interconnecting cable is represented by dashed lines. The receiver R is connected to a destination D. A label T1400160-93/d13 is in the bottom right corner. + +| $C_w$
(microfarads) | Data signalling rate
range (kbit/s) | +|------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 1.0 | de 0 - 2.5 | +| 0.47 | de 2.5 - 5 | +| 0.22 | de 5 - 10 | +| 0.1 | de 10 - 25 | +| 0.047 | de 25 - 50 | +| 0.022 | de 50 - 100 | + +FIGURE 1.1/V.10 + +### Example method of waveshaping + +# Appendix II + +## Cable Guidelines + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +No electrical characteristics of the interconnection cable are specified in this Recommendation. However, guidance is given herein concerning operational constraints imposed by cable length and near-end crosstalk. + +The maximum operating distance for the unbalanced interchange circuit is primarily a function of the amount of interference (near-end crosstalk) coupled to adjacent circuits in the equipment interconnection. Additionally the unbalanced circuit is susceptible to exposure to differential noise resulting from any imbalance between the signal conductor and signal common return at the load interchange point. Increasing the physical separation and interconnection cable length between the generator and load interchange points might increase the exposure to common-mode noise and the degree of near-end crosstalk. Accordingly, users are advised to restrict the cable length to a minimum consistent with the generator-load physical separation requirements. + +The curve of cable length versus data signalling rate given in Figure II.1 may be used as a conservative guide. This curve is based upon calculations and empirical data using twisted-pair telephone cable with a shunt capacitance of 0.052 microfarads per kilometre, a 50-ohm source impedance, a 6-volt source signal and maximum near-end crosstalk of 1-volt peak. The rise time ( $t_r$ ) of the source signal at signalling rates below 1000 bit/s is 100 microseconds and above 1000 bit/s is $0.1 t_b$ (see Figure 5). + +The user is cautioned that the curve given in Figure II-1 does not account for common-mode noise or near-end crosstalk levels beyond the limits specified, that may be introduced between the generator and load by exceptionally long cables. On the other hand operation within the signalling-rate and distance bounds of Figure II.1 will usually ensure that the distortion of the signal appearing at the receiver input will be acceptable. Many applications, however, can tolerate greater levels of signal distortion, and correspondingly greater cable lengths can be employed. The generation of near-end crosstalk can be reduced by increasing the amount of waveshaping employed. + +Experience has shown that in most practical cases the operating distance at the lower data signalling rates may be extended to several kilometres. + +![A log-log graph showing Cable length (m) on the Y-axis versus Data signalling rate (bit/s) on the X-axis. The Y-axis ranges from 10^1 to 10^4, and the X-axis ranges from 10^2 to 10^5. A solid line represents the maximum cable length for a given signalling rate. The line is horizontal at 10^3 m for rates up to 10^3 bit/s, then slopes downward, passing through (10^4, 10^2) and (10^5, 10^1).](9a19da4f7fccb96a934411c0bb5a386d_img.jpg) + +| Data signalling rate (bit/s) | Cable length (m) | +|------------------------------|------------------| +| 10 2 | 10 3 | +| 10 3 | 10 3 | +| 10 4 | 10 2 | +| 10 5 | 10 1 | + +A log-log graph showing Cable length (m) on the Y-axis versus Data signalling rate (bit/s) on the X-axis. The Y-axis ranges from 10^1 to 10^4, and the X-axis ranges from 10^2 to 10^5. A solid line represents the maximum cable length for a given signalling rate. The line is horizontal at 10^3 m for rates up to 10^3 bit/s, then slopes downward, passing through (10^4, 10^2) and (10^5, 10^1). + +FIGURE II.1/V.10 +Data signalling rate vs cable length for unbalanced +interchange circuit + +## Reference + +- [1] CCITT Recommendation *List of definitions for interchange circuits between data terminal equipment (DTE) and data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE) on public data networks*, Vol. VIII, Rec. X.24. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.100-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.100-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a0b447fb0092e098fcee29289ea29d46ff25e2c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.100-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.100 + +# **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +## --- **INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN PUBLIC DATA NETWORKS (PDNs) AND THE PUBLIC SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS (PSTN)** + +## **ITU-T Recommendation V.100** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +## NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.100 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## **INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN PUBLIC DATA NETWORKS (PDNs) AND THE PUBLIC SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS (PSTN)** + +*(Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984)* + +The CCITT, + +*considering that* + +- (a) a data station may have an ingoing or outgoing access to a packet switched public data network (PSPDN) via the national1) PSTN; +- (b) the transmission characteristics of the data station may not be known at the PSPDN access level; +- (c) in this case, the transmission characteristics have to be negotiated between modems before establishing the connection; +- (d) half-duplex modems as well as full duplex modems may be used; + +*proposes* + +that Administrations may optionally introduce the following handshaking procedures including the types of modems to be supported. + +### **1 Procedure description** + +According to the type of modem (see Table 1/V.100), a half-duplex or a duplex procedure is used. + +#### **1.1 Half-duplex procedure** + +See Figure 1/V.100. + +##### **1.1.1 Answer mode modem** + +- a) Following the transmission of the answer sequence in accordance with Recommendation V.25, the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107, and then transmit a segment S1 in accordance with Table 1/V.100 for 294 ms. Interchange circuits 106 and 109 are in the OFF condition during the procedure. +- b) The modem remains silent until it detects S2 (defined in Table 1/V.100) or the synchronizing signals of a V.27 *ter* modem in the fallback mode. +- c) Then the modem conditions itself to the selected mode or disconnects. + +If no response is detected within 2 seconds following the end of the S1 transmission, the modem resumes transmitting S1. + +--- + +1) **International access to a PSPDN via PSTN is not envisaged.** + +TABLE 1/V.100 + +###### **S2 and S1 signals** + +| Categories | Data rate
(bit/s) | Recommendation | Procedure | S2
(calling DCE) | S1
(Answering DCE) | +|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| Duplex
asynchronous | 300
1200 | V.21
V.22 | Duplex
Duplex | 980 Hz
1200 Hz | 1650 Hz
1800 + 2250 Hz | +| Duplex
synchronous
(FDM) | 1200
2400 | V.22
V.22 bis | Duplex
Duplex | 1200 Hz
1200 Hz | 1800 + 2250 Hz
1800 + 2250 Hz | +| Duplex
synchronous
(ECT) a) | 2400
4800
9600 | V.26 ter
V.32
V.32 | Half-duplex
Duplex
Duplex | (See V.26 ter )
(See V.32)
(See V.32) | (See V.26 ter )
(See V.32)
(See V.32) | +| Half-duplex
synchronous | 2400
4800
9600 | V.27 ter
(fallback mode)
V.27 ter
(Under study) | Half-duplex
Half-duplex
Half-duplex | None
1400 Hz
1100 Hz | None
2200 Hz
2300 Hz | +| Asymmetric
asynchronous | 75/1200 | V.23 | Duplex | 390 Hz | 1300 Hz | + +a) ECT = echo cancellation technique. + +![Timing diagram for the half-duplex procedure showing signaling between Answering and Calling modems and the line. The diagram includes signals 109, 106, and 107. Key events include a 2100 Hz tone, S1 and S2 signaling, and a 75±20 ms connection to the line. Time intervals of 2.15 s, 3.4 s, and T = 294 ms are marked.](d62e2e2281009c16f4ee61660e716cd9_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the half-duplex procedure timing. It shows three signal lines: 109 (top), 106 (middle), and 107 (bottom). The 'Answering modem' section shows a 2100 Hz tone followed by a 3.4 s interval, then a 75±20 ms connection to the line. The 'Calling modem' section shows a 2100 Hz tone followed by a 3.4 s interval, then a 75±20 ms connection to the line. The S1 and S2 signaling is shown with a 2100 Hz tone and a 75±20 ms connection to the line. The time interval T = 294 ms is marked for the S1 and S2 signaling. The 2100 Hz tone is also shown with a 2.15 s interval. The diagram is labeled 'See Note' and 'CCITT-65360'. + +Timing diagram for the half-duplex procedure showing signaling between Answering and Calling modems and the line. The diagram includes signals 109, 106, and 107. Key events include a 2100 Hz tone, S1 and S2 signaling, and a 75±20 ms connection to the line. Time intervals of 2.15 s, 3.4 s, and T = 294 ms are marked. + +Note – The 2100 Hz tone is transmitted to disable the echo suppressors in case of duplex transmission (see Recommendation V.26 *ter*). For half-duplex transmission, this tone is not mandatory. + +FIGURE 1/V.100 +Half-duplex procedure + +If S2 indicates a capability not available, the modem shall disconnect from the line. + +If S2 indicates a capability available, the modem conditions itself to this mode. + +- d) After the end of reception of S2, in the case of a duplex modem (see V.26 *ter*), in accordance with Recommendation G.164, the modem transmits a $2100 \pm 15$ Hz tone for $500 \pm 50$ ms to disable echo suppressors, then remains silent for $75 \pm 20$ ms. + +*Note* - In the case of half-duplex modems, the transmission of the 2100 Hz tone is not needed. + +##### 1.1.2 Call mode modem + +- a) After connection to line, the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 (interchange circuits 106 and 109 are in the OFF condition during the procedure). The modem keeps silent during at least 400 ms. + +During this period, it detects S1. + +The calling modem selects a mode of interworking in accordance with S1 or its nominal one. + +- b) Then, it transmits S2 in accordance with Table 1/V.100 or the synchronizing signals of a V.27 *ter* modem in the fallback mode at 2400 bit/s. +- c) Then, it conditions itself to the selected capability. + +#### 1.2 Duplex procedure + +See Figure 2/V.100. + +![Timing diagram for the Duplex procedure showing signaling between an answering modem and a calling modem.](4d7f667796a8cdcdd745e953ac11e289_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the duplex procedure timing. It shows three signal lines at the top: 109, 106, and 107. Lines 109 and 106 are initially low and then transition to high (indicated by dashed lines). Line 107 transitions from low to high at the start of the procedure. Below these, the 'Answering modem' and 'Calling modem' are shown. The answering modem transmits a 2100 Hz tone for 2.15 s, followed by a 3.4 s interval, and then S1. The calling modem receives S1 and then transmits S2. A 'Connection to line' is indicated by an arrow pointing to the line between the modems. The timing for the 2100 Hz tone is 500 ± 50 ms, and the subsequent silence is 75 ± 20 ms. The diagram is labeled CCITT-65370. + +Timing diagram for the Duplex procedure showing signaling between an answering modem and a calling modem. + +FIGURE 2/V.100 +Duplex procedure + +##### 1.2.1 Answer mode modem + +- a) Following the transmission of the answer sequence in accordance with Recommendation V.25, the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 (interchange circuits 106 and 109 are in the OFF condition during the procedure). +- b) Then, the modem transmits a segment S1 in accordance with Table 1/V.100 at least $40 \pm 10$ ms and until it has detected the end of transmission of S2. + +*Note* - During this period, some exchanges may occur between the two modems according to the Series V Recommendation concerned (see Recommendation V.32). + +If no response is detected within a time period (under study), the modem shall disconnect from line. + +If S2 indicates a capability not available, the modem shall disconnect from the line. + +If S2 indicates a capability available, the modem conditions itself to this mode. + +##### 1.2.2 Call mode modem + +- a) In accordance with Recommendation V.25, after detection of the 2100 Hz tone and a silent period of $75 \pm 20$ ms, the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 (interchange circuits 106 and 109 are in the OFF condition during the procedure). +- b) The modem detects S1. + +The calling modem selects a mode of interworking in accordance with S1 or its nominal one. + +- c) Then, it transmits S2 in accordance with Table 1/V.100. + +*Note* - If the modem has only one possibility, it may transmit S2 after being connected to line. + +- d) Then, it conditions itself to the selected capability. + +### 2 Combined half and duplex procedure + +This section describes the interworking between a DCE having the capability of handling the two procedures [referred to as two procedures (TP)modem] and DCEs having only one procedure. + +#### 2.1 Interworking with half-duplex procedure + +##### 2.1.1 TP modem in the answering mode + +See Figure 3/V.100. + +![Timing diagram for TP modem in answering mode showing the interaction between an answering modem and a calling modem.](a9ed452e3e099e1505f7b9ad182a11e9_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the timing sequence for a TP modem in answering mode. It shows two horizontal timelines. The top timeline is for the 'Answering modem (TP modem)'. It begins with a box labeled 'Line on', followed by a sequence of two boxes labeled 'S1' and 'S1z'. Above the 'S1' box is a bracket labeled 'S1' and the text 'Starts transmitting S1'. The bottom timeline is for the 'Calling modem'. It shows a 'Line on' event followed by a box labeled 'S2'. An arrow points from the end of the 'S2' box on the calling modem timeline to the start of the 'S1z' box on the answering modem timeline. Below the 'S2' box, the text 'Transmits S2' is written. A horizontal arrow labeled 'Time' indicates the direction of the sequence. At the bottom, the text 'TP modem answer mode' is centered. + +Timing diagram for TP modem in answering mode showing the interaction between an answering modem and a calling modem. + +###### 2.1.1.1 Answer TP modem + +- a) After the V.25 sequence, the modem will transmit S1 which is composed of two segments S11 and S12 (as described in Appendix I to Recommendation V.32). + +S11 is a modulated signal transmitted during 294 ms in a 600-3000 Hz bandwidth, S12 is a tone out of the 600-3000 Hz band. + +- b) After the transmission of S12, the modem is waiting for S2. When it detects S2, it stops transmitting S12 and proceeds with the half-duplex procedure. + +###### 2.1.1.2 Calling modem + +The calling modem shall proceed with the half-duplex procedure taking into account that S12 is an out-of-band signal. + +##### 2.1.2 TP modem in the calling mode + +See Figure 4/V.100. + +![Timing diagram for TP modem call mode showing Answering modem and Calling modem (TP modem) interactions.](9791722d75115ddcc599b07d7bc35d73_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the timing for a TP modem in call mode. It shows two horizontal timelines. The top timeline is for the 'Answering modem' and the bottom for the 'Calling modem (TP modem)'. The Answering modem starts with a '2100 Hz' signal, followed by a block labeled 'S1'. The Calling modem starts with an arrow pointing to the line labeled 'Connect to line'. It then receives a signal 'S2'. A dashed arrow points from the end of 'S1' to the start of 'S2'. The reference 'CCITT-65390' is at the bottom right. + +Timing diagram for TP modem call mode showing Answering modem and Calling modem (TP modem) interactions. + +FIGURE 4/V.100 +TP modem callmode + +###### 2.1.2.1 Answering modem + +The answering modem shall proceed with the half-duplex procedure. + +###### 2.1.2.2 Calling TP modem + +The calling TP modem after the V.25 sequence and connection to line remains silent. It detects S1 and shall proceed with the half-duplex procedure. + +#### 2.2 Interworking with duplex procedure + +##### 2.2.1 TP modem in the answering mode + +See Figure 5/V.100. + +![Timing diagram for TP modem answer mode showing Answering modem (TP modem) and Calling modem interactions.](21c78ed8eb23eb76d4a2c9edbe5626bb_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the timing for a TP modem in answer mode. It shows two horizontal timelines. The top timeline is for the 'Answering modem (TP modem)' and the bottom for the 'Calling modem'. The Answering modem starts with a '2100 Hz' signal, followed by blocks labeled 'S11' and 'S12'. The Calling modem starts with an arrow pointing to the line labeled 'Connect to line'. It then receives a signal 'S2'. A solid arrow points from the end of 'S12' to the start of 'S2'. A dashed line extends from the end of 'S2'. A label 'Stops transmitting S2' points to the end of the 'S12' block. The reference 'CCITT-65400' is at the bottom right. + +Timing diagram for TP modem answer mode showing Answering modem (TP modem) and Calling modem interactions. + +FIGURE 5/V.100 +TP modem answer mode + +###### 2.2.1.1 Answering TP modem + +The modem proceeds as in § 2.1.1.1 except that after detection of S2, it shall follow the duplex procedure. + +###### 2.2.1.2 Calling modem + +The calling modem shall proceed with the duplex procedure. + +##### 2.2.2 TP modem in the calling mode + +See Figure 6/V.100. + +![Timing diagram for TP modem call mode showing the interaction between an Answering modem and a Calling modem (TP modem).](5860ad6bd2a2dd8d1ab12864b8f90f37_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the timing sequence for a TP modem call mode. It features two horizontal timelines. The top timeline, labeled 'Answering modem', shows a '2100 Hz' tone followed by a signal 'S1'. The bottom timeline, labeled 'Calling modem (TP modem)', shows a vertical arrow labeled 'Connect to line' followed by a signal 'S2'. A horizontal double-headed arrow labeled 'Detects S1' spans the time between the 'Connect to line' event and the start of 'S1'. A diagonal arrow points from the 'Detects S1' period to the 'S1' signal on the Answering modem timeline. The reference 'CCITT-V.100' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Timing diagram for TP modem call mode showing the interaction between an Answering modem and a Calling modem (TP modem). + +FIGURE 6/V.100 +TP modem call mode + +###### 2.2.2.1 Answering modem + +The answering modem shall proceed with the duplex procedure. + +###### 2.2.2.2 Calling TP modem + +The calling TP modem after the V.25 sequence and connection to line remains silent. It detects S1 and shall proceed with the duplex procedure. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.11-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.11-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5aa6c5e9bf734bb16ad170e1f1b175ea911ff0b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.11-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,596 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.11 + +(10/96) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interfaces and voiceband modems + +--- + +**Electrical characteristics for balanced +double-current interchange circuits operating +at data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.11 + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +- 1 – General +- 2 – Interfaces and voiceband modems** +- 3 – Wideband modems +- 4 – Error control +- 5 – Transmission quality and maintenance +- 6 – Interworking with other networks + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation V.11 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 14 (1993-1996) and was approved by the WTSC (Geneva, October 9-18, 1996). + +## --- NOTE + +1. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. +2. The status of annexes and appendices attached to the Series V Recommendations should be interpreted as follows: + - an *annex* to a Recommendation forms an integral part of the Recommendation; + - an *appendix* to a Recommendation does not form part of the Recommendation and only provides some complementary explanation or information specific to that Recommendation. + +© ITU 1997 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Introduction ..... | 1 | +| 2 | Field of application ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Symbolic representation of interchange circuit ..... | 1 | +| 4 | Generator polarities and receiver significant levels ..... | 2 | +| | 4.1 Generator ..... | 2 | +| | 4.2 Receiver ..... | 2 | +| 5 | Generator ..... | 2 | +| | 5.1 Resistance and d.c. offset voltage ..... | 2 | +| | 5.2 Static reference measurements ..... | 3 | +| | 5.3 Dynamic voltage balance and rise time measurements ..... | 5 | +| 6 | Load ..... | 6 | +| | 6.1 Characteristics ..... | 6 | +| | 6.2 Receiver input voltage – Current measurements ..... | 7 | +| | 6.3 D.c. input sensitivity measurements ..... | 7 | +| | 6.4 Input balance test ..... | 8 | +| | 6.5 Terminator ..... | 8 | +| 7 | Environmental constraints ..... | 9 | +| 8 | Circuit protection ..... | 9 | +| 9 | Detection of generator power-off or circuit failure ..... | 9 | +| 10 | Measurements at the physical interchange point ..... | 10 | +| | 10.1 Listing of essential measurements ..... | 10 | +| | 10.2 Listing of optional measurements ..... | 10 | +| | Annex A – Compatibility with other interfaces ..... | 11 | +| | A.1 Compatibility of V.10 and V.11 interchange circuits in the same interface ..... | 11 | +| | A.2 Recommendation V.11 interworking with Recommendation V.10 ..... | 11 | +| | Appendix I – Cable and termination ..... | 11 | +| | I.1 Cable ..... | 11 | +| | I.2 Cable length ..... | 11 | +| | I.3 Cable termination ..... | 13 | +| | Appendix II – Multipoint operation ..... | 13 | +| | Reference ..... | 13 | + +# **ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR BALANCED DOUBLE-CURRENT INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS OPERATING AT DATA SIGNALLING RATES UP TO 10 Mbit/s1)** + +*(Geneva, 1976; amended Geneva, 1980, at Melbourne, 1988, at Helsinki, 1993 and at Geneva, 1996)* + +## **1 Introduction** + +This Recommendation deals with the electrical characteristics of the generator, receiver and interconnecting leads of a differential signalling (balanced) interchange circuit with an optional d.c. offset voltage. + +The balanced generator and load components are designed to cause minimum mutual interference with adjacent balanced or unbalanced interchange circuits (see Recommendation V.10) provided that waveshaping is employed on the unbalanced circuits. + +In the context of this Recommendation, a balanced interchange circuit is defined as consisting of a balanced generator connected by a balanced interconnecting pair to a balanced receiver. For a balanced generator, the algebraic sum of both the outlet potentials, with respect to earth, shall be constant for all signals transmitted; the impedances of the outlets with respect to earth shall be equal. The degree of balance and other essential parameters of the interconnecting pair is a matter for further study. + +Annex A and Appendices I and II are provided to give guidance on a number of application aspects as follows: + +- Annex A – Compatibility with other interfaces. +- Appendix I – Cable and termination. +- Appendix II – Multipoint operation. + +NOTE – Generator and load devices meeting the electrical characteristics of this Recommendation need not operate over the entire data signalling rate range specified. They may be designed to operate over narrower ranges to satisfy requirements more economically, particularly at lower data signalling rates. + +Reference measurements are described which may be used to verify certain of the recommended parameters but it is a matter for individual manufacturers to decide what tests are necessary to ensure compliance with this Recommendation. + +## **2 Field of application** + +The electrical characteristics specified in this Recommendation apply to interchange circuits operating with data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s. + +Typical points of application are illustrated in Figure 1. + +Whilst the balanced interchange circuit is primarily intended for use at the higher data signalling rates, its use at the lower rates may be necessary in the following cases: + +- 1) where the interconnecting cable is too long for proper unbalanced circuit operation; +- 2) where extraneous noise sources make unbalanced circuit operation impossible; +- 3) where it is necessary to minimize interference with other signals. + +## **3 Symbolic representation of interchange circuit** + +See Figure 2. + +The equipment at both sides of the interface may implement generators as well as receivers in any combination. Consequently, the symbolic representation of the interchange circuit, Figure 2 below, defines a generator interchange point as well as a load interchange point. + +--- + +1) This Recommendation is also designated as Recommendation X.27 in the X-Series Recommendations. + +![Diagram showing two typical applications of balanced interchange circuits. The top diagram shows two DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) blocks connected by a balanced interchange circuit, represented by a vertical oval with two horizontal lines passing through it. The bottom diagram shows a DTE block connected to a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) block by a similar balanced interchange circuit. An arrow points from the text 'Circuits to this Recommendation' to the vertical oval in both diagrams. The identifier 'T1400040-93/d01' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.](547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing two typical applications of balanced interchange circuits. The top diagram shows two DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) blocks connected by a balanced interchange circuit, represented by a vertical oval with two horizontal lines passing through it. The bottom diagram shows a DTE block connected to a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) block by a similar balanced interchange circuit. An arrow points from the text 'Circuits to this Recommendation' to the vertical oval in both diagrams. The identifier 'T1400040-93/d01' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +FIGURE 1/V.11 + +### Typical applications of balanced interchange circuits + +For data transmission applications, it is commonly accepted that the interface cabling will be provided by the DTE. This introduces the line of demarcation between the DTE plus cable and the DCE. This line is also called the interchange point and physically implemented in the form of a connector. The applications also require interchange circuits in both directions. This leads to an illustration as shown in Figure 3. + +## 4 Generator polarities and receiver significant levels + +### 4.1 Generator + +The signal conditions for the generator are specified in terms of the voltage between output points A and B shown in Figure 2. + +When the signal condition 0 (space) for data circuits or ON for control and timing circuits is transmitted, the output point A is positive with respect to point B. When the signal condition 1 (mark) for data circuits or OFF for control and timing circuits is transmitted, the output point A is negative with respect to point B. + +### 4.2 Receiver + +The receiver differential significant levels are shown in Table 1, where $V_{A'}$ and $V_{B'}$ are respectively the voltages at points A' and B' relative to point C'. + +## 5 Generator2) + +### 5.1 Resistance and d.c. offset voltage + +**5.1.1** The total generator resistance between points A and B shall be less than or equal to 100 ohms and be adequately balanced with respect to point C. The degree of balance required, both static and dynamic, is left for further study). + +2) For test purposes other than specified in this Recommendation (e.g. signal quality measurement), a transmitter test load of 100 ohms may be used. + +#### NOTES + +1 – It is assumed that the value of the dynamic source impedance is in the same range. + +2 – In the event that reflections are experienced on V.11 circuits, either the use of a terminating network at the receiver (in the range of 120 to 126 ohms) or the use of series resistors (approximately 33 ohms) added to the generator output leads, should alleviate this problem. This latter solution has the additional benefit of providing protection from over-voltages but creates a problem with meeting the Test-termination measurement specified in 5.2.2. + +![Symbolic representation of a balanced interchange circuit diagram. The diagram shows a Generator (G) connected to a Balanced interconnecting cable, which is then connected to a Load (R). The cable has a Cable termination (Zt) at the receiver end. Interchange points are marked: Generator interchange point (A, B) and Load interchange point (A', B'). Zero volt reference interchange points (C, C') are also shown. Voltages are labeled: V_ab (Generator output voltage between points A and B), V_ca (Generator voltage between points C and A), V_cb (Generator voltage between points C and B), Zt (Cable termination impedance), and Vg (Ground potential difference).](997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg) + +Symbolic representation of a balanced interchange circuit diagram. The diagram shows a Generator (G) connected to a Balanced interconnecting cable, which is then connected to a Load (R). The cable has a Cable termination (Zt) at the receiver end. Interchange points are marked: Generator interchange point (A, B) and Load interchange point (A', B'). Zero volt reference interchange points (C, C') are also shown. Voltages are labeled: V\_ab (Generator output voltage between points A and B), V\_ca (Generator voltage between points C and A), V\_cb (Generator voltage between points C and B), Zt (Cable termination impedance), and Vg (Ground potential difference). + +| | | +|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------| +| $V_{ab}$ | Generator output voltage between points A and B | +| $V_{ca}$ | Generator voltage between points C and A | +| $V_{cb}$ | Generator voltage between points C and B | +| $Z_t$ | Cable termination impedance | +| $V_g$ | Ground potential difference | +| A, B and A', B' | Interchange points | +| C, C' | Zero volt reference interchange points | + +#### NOTES + +1 – Two interchange points are shown. The output characteristics of the generator, excluding any interconnecting cable, are defined at the “generator interchange point”. The electrical characteristics to which the receiver must respond are defined at the “load interchange point”. + +2 – Points C and C' may be interconnected and further connected to protective ground if required by national regulations. + +FIGURE 2/V.11 + +#### **Symbolic representation of a balanced interchange circuit** + +**5.1.2** The magnitude of the generator d.c. offset voltage (see 5.2.2) shall not exceed 3 V under all operating conditions. + +### 5.2 Static reference measurements + +The generator characteristics are specified in accordance with measurements illustrated in Figure 4 and described in 5.2.1 to 5.2.4. + +#### 5.2.1 Open-circuit measurement + +See Figure 4 a). + +The open-circuit voltage measurement is made with a 3900-ohm resistor connected between points A and B. In both binary states, the magnitude of the differential voltage ( $V_0$ ) shall not be more than 6.0 volts, nor shall the magnitude of $V_{0a}$ and $V_{0b}$ be more than 6.0 volts. + +![Figure 3/V.11: Practical representation of the interface. This schematic diagram shows the electrical connection between a Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and a Data Communications Equipment (DCE) through a cable. The DTE side (left) includes a generator (G) and a receiver (R). The DCE side (right) includes a receiver (R) and a generator (G). A central vertical dashed line represents the 'Line of demarcation'. Points A, B, C, C' are on the DCE side, and A', B', C, C' are on the DTE side. A test load Zt is connected between A and B. Ground connections are shown for 'DTE and Cable' (Note 2) and 'DCE' (Note 2). A connector is shown at the top with points A' and B'. Note 1 indicates that C and C' may be interconnected via the signal ground conductor. The document identifier T1400230-93/d03 is at the bottom right.](3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg) + +Figure 3/V.11: Practical representation of the interface. This schematic diagram shows the electrical connection between a Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and a Data Communications Equipment (DCE) through a cable. The DTE side (left) includes a generator (G) and a receiver (R). The DCE side (right) includes a receiver (R) and a generator (G). A central vertical dashed line represents the 'Line of demarcation'. Points A, B, C, C' are on the DCE side, and A', B', C, C' are on the DTE side. A test load Zt is connected between A and B. Ground connections are shown for 'DTE and Cable' (Note 2) and 'DCE' (Note 2). A connector is shown at the top with points A' and B'. Note 1 indicates that C and C' may be interconnected via the signal ground conductor. The document identifier T1400230-93/d03 is at the bottom right. + +##### NOTES + +- 1 – The zero volt reference interchange point C, C' may be interconnected via the signal ground conductor. +- 2 – Signal ground may be further connected to external protective ground if national regulations require. +- 3 – The type of connector with this electrical characteristic specification depends on the application. ISO specifies, for data transmission over telephone type facilities, a 37-pin connector in ISO 4902 and, for data transmission over data network facilities, a 15-pin connector in ISO 4903. + +FIGURE 3/V.11 + +#### Practical representation of the interface + +TABLE 1/V.11 + +#### Receiver differential significant levels + +| | $V_{A'} - V_{B'} \leq -0.3 \text{ V}$ | $V_{A'} - V_{B'} \geq +0.3 \text{ V}$ | +|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| Data circuits | 1 | 0 | +| Control and timing circuits | OFF | ON | + +#### 5.2.2 Test-termination measurement + +See Figure 4 b). + +With a test load of two resistors, each 50 ohms, connected in series between the output points A and B, the differential voltage ( $V_t$ ) shall not be less than 2.0 volts or 50% of the magnitude of $V_0$ , whichever is greater. For the opposite binary state the polarity of $V_t$ shall be reversed ( $-V_t$ ). The difference in the magnitudes of $V_t$ and $-V_t$ shall be less than 0.4 volt. The magnitude of the generator offset voltage $V_{0s}$ measured between the centre of the test load and point C shall not be greater than 3.0 volts. The magnitude of the difference in the values of $V_{0s}$ for one binary state and the opposite binary state shall be less than 0.4 volt. + +NOTE – Under some conditions this measurement does not determine the degree of balance of the internal generator impedances to point C. It is left for further study whether additional measurements are necessary to ensure adequate balance in generator output impedances. + +#### 5.2.3 Short-circuit measurement + +See Figure 4 c). + +With the output points A and B short-circuited to point C, the current flowing through each of the output points A or B in both binary states shall not exceed 150 milliamperes. + +#### 5.2.4 Power-off measurements + +See Figure 4 d). + +Under power-off condition with voltages ranging between +0.25 volt and -0.25 volt applied between each output point and point C, as indicated in Figure 4 d), the magnitude of the output leakage currents ( $I_{xa}$ and $I_{xb}$ ) shall not exceed 100 microamperes. + +![Figure 4/V.11: Generator-parameter reference measurements. The diagram shows four test setups (a, b, c, d) for a generator G with outputs A, B, and C. Setup (a) is open-circuit measurement with a 3.9 kΩ resistor and voltmeters V0, V0a, and V0b. Setup (b) is test-termination measurement with 50 Ω terminations and voltmeters Vt and V0s. Setup (c) is short-circuit measurement with ammeters Isa and Isb. Setup (d) is power-off measurement with current sources Ixa and Ixb and voltage sources ±0.25 V and ∓0.25 V. A bracket on the left indicates 'Steady-state logic input (1 or 0)'.](dbe553cf16dd14073b89a8263a428664_img.jpg) + +**a) Open-circuit measurement** + +$$|V_0| \leq 6.0 \text{ V}$$ +$$|V_{0a}| \leq 6.0 \text{ V}$$ +$$|V_{0b}| \leq 6.0 \text{ V}$$ + +**b) Test-termination measurement** + +$$0 |V_t| \geq 2 \text{ V}$$ +$$0.5 V_0 \leq |V_t|$$ +$$\|V_t| - |V_t|\| < 0.4 \text{ V}$$ +$$|V_{0s}| \leq 3.0 \text{ V}$$ +$$|V_{0s}(1) - V_{0s}(0)| < 0.4 \text{ V}$$ + +**c) Short-circuit measurement** + +$$|I_{sa}| < 150 \text{ mA}$$ +$$|I_{sb}| < 150 \text{ mA}$$ + +**d) Power-off measurement** + +$$|I_{xa}| < 100 \text{ } \mu\text{A}$$ +$$|I_{xb}| < 150 \text{ } \mu\text{A}$$ + +\* Matched. + +T1400240-93/d04 + +Figure 4/V.11: Generator-parameter reference measurements. The diagram shows four test setups (a, b, c, d) for a generator G with outputs A, B, and C. Setup (a) is open-circuit measurement with a 3.9 kΩ resistor and voltmeters V0, V0a, and V0b. Setup (b) is test-termination measurement with 50 Ω terminations and voltmeters Vt and V0s. Setup (c) is short-circuit measurement with ammeters Isa and Isb. Setup (d) is power-off measurement with current sources Ixa and Ixb and voltage sources ±0.25 V and ∓0.25 V. A bracket on the left indicates 'Steady-state logic input (1 or 0)'. + +FIGURE 4/V.11 +Generator-parameter reference measurements + +### 5.3 Dynamic voltage balance and rise time measurements + +See Figure 5. + +With the measurement configuration shown in Figure 5, a test signal with a nominal signal element duration $t_b$ and composed of alternate ones and zeros, shall be applied to the input. The change in amplitude of the output signal during transitions from one binary state to the other shall be monotonic between 0.1 and 0.9 $V_{ss}$ within 0.1 of $t_b$ or 20 nanoseconds, whichever is greater. Thereafter the signal voltage shall not vary more than 10% of $V_{ss}$ from the steady state value. + +The resultant voltage due to imbalance ( $V_E$ ) shall not exceed 0.4 V peak-to-peak. + +![Circuit diagram for generator dynamic balance and rise-time measurements. A generator G is connected to a load consisting of two 50 ohm resistors in series, with a 50 ohm resistor in parallel to ground. The output voltage V_E is measured across the parallel resistor. The voltage difference between steady-state signal conditions is V_ss. The output voltage V_E is specified to be less than 0.4 V peak-to-peak (provisional).](cfda9df1319e04207eb28bcefd1dab7b_img.jpg) + +$V_E < 0.4$ V peak-to-peak (provisional) + +$V_{ss}$ Voltage difference between steady-state signal conditions + +a) Matched. + +Circuit diagram for generator dynamic balance and rise-time measurements. A generator G is connected to a load consisting of two 50 ohm resistors in series, with a 50 ohm resistor in parallel to ground. The output voltage V\_E is measured across the parallel resistor. The voltage difference between steady-state signal conditions is V\_ss. The output voltage V\_E is specified to be less than 0.4 V peak-to-peak (provisional). + +![Timing diagram showing a test signal element with duration t_b. The signal transitions between steady state '0' and steady state '1' levels, separated by V_ss. The rise time t_r+ and fall time t_r- are indicated. The signal amplitude is specified to be within ±0.1 V_ss of the steady state levels. The diagram is labeled T1400250-93/d05.](f519a5be118c846f631c992412353fb9_img.jpg) + +Timing diagram showing a test signal element with duration t\_b. The signal transitions between steady state '0' and steady state '1' levels, separated by V\_ss. The rise time t\_r+ and fall time t\_r- are indicated. The signal amplitude is specified to be within ±0.1 V\_ss of the steady state levels. The diagram is labeled T1400250-93/d05. + +$t_b$ Nominal duration of the test signal element +for $t_b \geq 200$ ns, $t_r \leq 0.1 t_b$ +for $t_b < 200$ ns, $t_r \leq 20$ ns + +FIGURE 5/V.11 + +#### Generator dynamic balance and rise-time measurements + +## 6 Load + +### 6.1 Characteristics + +The load consists of a receiver (R) and an optional cable termination resistance ( $Z_T$ ) as shown in Figure 2. The electrical characteristics of the receiver are specified in terms of the measurements illustrated in Figures 6, 7 and 8 and described in 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4. A circuit meeting these requirements results in a differential receiver having a high input impedance, a small input threshold transition region between $-0.3$ and $+0.3$ volts differential, and allowance for an internal bias voltage not to exceed 3 volts in magnitude. + +The receiver is electrically identical to that specified for the unbalanced receiver in Recommendation V.10. + +### 6.2 Receiver input voltage – Current measurements + +See Figure 6. + +With the voltage $V_{ia}$ (or $V_{ib}$ ) ranging between $-10$ volts and $+10$ volts, while $V_{ib}$ (or $V_{ia}$ ) is held at $0$ volt, the resultant input current $I_{ia}$ (or $I_{ib}$ ) shall remain within the shaded range shown in Figure 6. These measurements apply with the power supply of the receiver in both the power-on and power-off conditions. + +![Figure 6/V.11: Receiver input voltage-current measurements. The left diagram shows a circuit with a receiver 'R' having inputs A', B', and C'. A voltage source V_ia is connected to A' through a current meter I_ia. A voltage source V_ib is connected to B' through a current meter I_ib. The right diagram is a graph of input current (mA) vs. input voltage (V). The x-axis ranges from -10 V to +10 V, with a vertical line at -3 V. The y-axis ranges from -3.25 mA to +3.25 mA. A shaded triangular region represents the allowed current range, bounded by lines passing through (-10, 0), (-3, -3.25), (0, 0), (3, 3.25), and (10, 0).](ff2492be4fa814905acbad18f261b8a5_img.jpg) + +Figure 6/V.11: Receiver input voltage-current measurements. The left diagram shows a circuit with a receiver 'R' having inputs A', B', and C'. A voltage source V\_ia is connected to A' through a current meter I\_ia. A voltage source V\_ib is connected to B' through a current meter I\_ib. The right diagram is a graph of input current (mA) vs. input voltage (V). The x-axis ranges from -10 V to +10 V, with a vertical line at -3 V. The y-axis ranges from -3.25 mA to +3.25 mA. A shaded triangular region represents the allowed current range, bounded by lines passing through (-10, 0), (-3, -3.25), (0, 0), (3, 3.25), and (10, 0). + +FIGURE 6/V.11 +Receiver input voltage-current measurements + +### 6.3 D.c. input sensitivity measurements + +See Figure 7. + +![Figure 7/V.11: D.c. input sensitivity measurements. The diagram shows a receiver 'R' with inputs A', B', and C'. A voltage source V_ia is connected to A'. A voltage source V_ib is connected to B'. A voltage source V_i is connected between A' and B'. The output of the receiver is labeled 'Output'. The reference code T1400100-93/d07 is at the bottom right.](8e14350b4b669119a3bdfca7869110ca_img.jpg) + +Figure 7/V.11: D.c. input sensitivity measurements. The diagram shows a receiver 'R' with inputs A', B', and C'. A voltage source V\_ia is connected to A'. A voltage source V\_ib is connected to B'. A voltage source V\_i is connected between A' and B'. The output of the receiver is labeled 'Output'. The reference code T1400100-93/d07 is at the bottom right. + +| Applied voltages | | Resulting input voltage $V_i$ | Output binary state | Purpose of measurement | | +|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--| +| $V_{ia}$ | $V_{ib}$ | | | | | +| -12 V
0 V
+12 V
0 V | 0 V
-12 V
0 V
+12 V | -12 V
+12 V
+12 V
-12 V | (Not specified) | To ensure no damage to receiver inputs | | +| +10 V
+4 V
-10 V
-4 V | +4 V
+10 V
-4 V
-10 V | +6 V
-6 V
-6 V
+6 V | 0
1
1
0 | To guarantee correct operation at $V_i = 6$ V (maintain correct logic state) | | +| 300 mV threshold measurement | | | | | | +| +0,30 V
0 V | 0 V
+0,30 V | +0,3 V
-0,3 V | 0
1 | $\} V_{cm} = 0$ V

$\} V_{cm} = +7$ V

$\} V_{cm} = -7$ V | | +| +7,15 V
+6,85 V | +6,85 V
+7,15 V | +0,3 V
-0,3 V | 0
1 | | | +| -7,15 V
-6,85 V | -6,85 V
-7,15 V | -0,3 V
+0,3 V | 1
0 | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | +| | | | | | | + +FIGURE 7/V.11 +Receiver input sensitivity measurement + +Over the entire common mode voltage ( $V_{cm}$ ) range of +7 volts to –7 volts, the receiver shall not require a differential input voltage ( $V_i$ ) of more than 300 millivolts to assume correctly the intended binary state. Reversing the polarity of $V_i$ shall cause the receiver to assume the opposite binary state. + +The maximum voltage (signal plus common mode) present between either receiver input and receiver ground shall not exceed 10 volts nor cause the receiver to malfunction. The receiver shall tolerate a maximum differential voltage of 12 volts applied across its input terminals without being damaged. + +In the presence of the combination of input voltages $V_{ia}$ and $V_{ib}$ specified in Figure 7, the receiver shall maintain the specified output binary state and shall not be damaged. + +NOTE – Designers of equipment should be aware that slow signal transitions with noise present may give rise to instability or oscillatory conditions in the receiving equipment; therefore, appropriate techniques should be implemented to prevent such behaviour. For example, adequate hysteresis may be incorporated in the receiver to prevent such conditions. + +### 6.4 Input balance test + +See Figure 8. + +The balance of the receiver input resistance and internal bias voltages shall be such that the receiver shall remain in the intended binary state under the conditions shown in Figure 8 and described as follows: + +- with $V_i = +720$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ varied between –7 and +7 volts; +- with $V_i = –720$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ varied between –7 and +7 volts; +- with $V_i = +300$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ a 1.5 volt peak-to-peak square wave at the highest applicable data signalling rate (this condition is provisional and subject to further study); +- with $V_i = –300$ millivolts and $V_{cm}$ a 1.5 volt peak-to-peak square wave at the highest applicable data signalling rate (this condition is provisional and subject to further study). + +![Circuit diagram for Receiver input balance test. A differential receiver 'R' has inputs A' and B' and a common mode reference point C'. Input A' is connected to a voltage source labeled '1/2 V_i' in series with a 500 ohm resistor. Input B' is connected to a voltage source labeled '1/2 V_i' in series with a 500 ohm resistor. Both sources are referenced to a common mode voltage source V_cm. The resistors are marked with superscript 'a' indicating they are matched.](78ffccd66df9bafd96e3e081110d09dd_img.jpg) + +T1400110-93/d08 + +a) Matched. + +Circuit diagram for Receiver input balance test. A differential receiver 'R' has inputs A' and B' and a common mode reference point C'. Input A' is connected to a voltage source labeled '1/2 V\_i' in series with a 500 ohm resistor. Input B' is connected to a voltage source labeled '1/2 V\_i' in series with a 500 ohm resistor. Both sources are referenced to a common mode voltage source V\_cm. The resistors are marked with superscript 'a' indicating they are matched. + +FIGURE 8/V.11 +**Receiver input balance test** + +### 6.5 Terminator + +The use of a cable terminating impedance ( $Z_t$ ) is optional depending upon the specific environment in which the interchange circuit is employed (see Appendix I). In no case shall the total load resistance be less than 100 ohms. + +## 7 Environmental constraints + +In order to operate a balanced interchange circuit at data signalling rates ranging between 0 and 10 Mbit/s, the following conditions apply: + +- 1) For each interchange circuit a balanced interconnecting pair is required. +- 2) Each interchange circuit must be appropriately terminated (see Appendix I). +- 3) The total common-mode voltage at the receiver must be less than 7 volts peak. + +The common mode voltage at the receiver is the worst case combination of: + +- a) generator-receiver ground-potential difference ( $V_g$ , Figure 2); +- b) longitudinally induced random noise voltage measured between the receiver points A' or B' and C' with the generator ends of the cable A, B and C joined together; and +- c) generator d.c. offset voltage, if any. + +Unless the generator is of a type which generates no d.c. offset voltage, the sum of a) and b) above, which is the element of the common mode voltage due to the environment of the interchange circuit, must be less than 4 volts peak. + +## 8 Circuit protection + +Balanced generator and load devices complying with this Recommendation shall not be damaged under the following conditions: + +- 1) generator open circuit; +- 2) short-circuit between the conductors of the interconnecting cable; +- 3) short-circuit between either or both conductors and point C or C'. + +The above faults 2) and 3) might cause power dissipation in the interchange circuit devices to approach the maximum power dissipation that may be tolerable by a typical Integrated Circuit (IC) package. The user is therefore cautioned that where multiple generators and receivers are implemented in a single IC package, only one such fault per package might be tolerable at any one time without damage occurring. + +The user is also cautioned that the generator and receiver devices complying with this Recommendation might be damaged by spurious voltages applied between their input or output points and points C or C' (Figure 2). In those applications where the interconnecting cable may be inadvertently connected to other circuits, or where it may be exposed to a severe electromagnetic environment, protection should be employed. + +## 9 Detection of generator power-off or circuit failure + +Certain applications require detection of various fault conditions in the interchange circuits, e.g.: + +- 1) generator power-off condition; +- 2) receiver not interconnected with a generator; +- 3) open-circuited interconnecting cable; +- 4) short-circuited interconnecting cable; +- 5) input signal to the load remaining within the transition region ( $\pm 300$ millivolts) for an abnormal period of time. + +When detection of one or more fault conditions is required by specific applications, additional provisions are required in the load and the following items must be determined: + +- a) which interchange circuits require fault detection; +- b) what faults must be detected; +- c) what action must be taken when a fault is detected, e.g. which binary state must the receiver assume? + +The interpretation of a fault condition by a receiver (or load) is application dependent. Each application may use a combination of the following classification: + +- *Type 0* – No interpretation. A receiver or load does not have fault detection capability. +- *Type 1* – Data circuits assume a binary 1 state. Control and timing circuits assume an OFF condition. +- *Type 2* – Data circuits assume binary 0 state. Control and timing circuits assume an ON condition. +- *Type 3* – Special interpretation. The receiver or load provides a special indication for interpreting a fault condition. This special indication requires further study. + +The association of the circuit failure detection to particular interchange circuits in accordance with the above types is a matter of the functional and procedural characteristics specification of the interface. + +The interchange circuits monitoring circuit fault conditions in the general telephone network interfaces are indicated in Recommendation V.24. + +The interchange circuits monitoring circuit fault conditions in public data network interfaces are indicated in Recommendation X.24 [1]. + +The receiver fault detection type required is specified in the relevant DCE Recommendations. + +## **10 Measurements at the physical interchange point** + +The following information provides guidance for measurements when maintenance persons examine the interface for proper operation at the interchange point. + +### **10.1 Listing of essential measurements** + +- The magnitude of the generator d.c. offset voltage under all operating conditions. +- Open-circuit measurements. +- Test-termination measurement. +- Short-circuit measurement. +- Dynamic voltage balance and rise time. +- D.c. input sensitivity measurements. + +### **10.2 Listing of optional measurements** + +- The total generator resistance between points A and B shall be equal to or less than 100 ohms and adequately balanced with respect to point C. (It is left for further study as to the degree of balance required both statically and dynamically.) +- Power-off measurements. +- Receiver input voltage-current measurements. +- Input balance test. +- Check of the required circuit fault detection (see clause 9). + +The parameters defined in this Recommendation are not necessarily measurable at the physical interchange point. This is for further study. + +## **Annex A** + +## **Compatibility with other interfaces** + +### **A.1 Compatibility of V.10 and V.11 interchange circuits in the same interface** + +The electrical characteristics of this Recommendation are designed to allow the use of unbalanced (see Recommendation V.10) and balanced circuits within the same interface. For example, the balanced circuits may be used for data and timing whilst the unbalanced circuits may be used for associated control circuit functions. + +### **A.2 Recommendation V.11 interworking with Recommendation V.10** + +The differential receiver specifications of Recommendation V.10 and this Recommendation are electrically identical. It is therefore possible to interconnect an equipment using V.10 receivers and generators on one side of the interface with an equipment using V.11 generators and receivers on the other side of the interface. Such interconnection would result in the interchange circuits according to this Recommendation in one direction and interchange circuits according to Recommendation V.10 in the other direction. Where such interworking is contemplated, the following technical considerations must be taken into account. + +**A.2.1** Interconnecting cable lengths are limited by performance of the circuits working to the V.10 side of the interface. + +**A.2.2** The optional cable termination resistance ( $Z_t$ ), if implemented, in the equipment using this Recommendation must be removed. + +**A.2.3** V.10-type receivers shall be of category 1. + +## **Appendix I** + +## **Cable and termination** + +No electrical characteristics of the interconnecting cable are specified in this Recommendation. Guidance is given herein concerning operational constraints imposed by the length, balance and terminating resistance of the cable. + +### **I.1 Cable** + +Over the length of the cable, the two conductors should have essentially the same values of: + +- 1) capacitance to ground; +- 2) longitudinal resistance and inductance; +- 3) coupling to adjacent cables and circuits. + +### **I.2 Cable length** + +The maximum permissible length of cable separating the generator and the load in a point-to-point application is a function of the data signalling rate. It is further influenced by the tolerable signal distortion and the environmental constraints such as ground potential difference and longitudinal noise. Increasing the distance between generator and load might increase the exposure to ground potential difference. + +As an illustration of the above conditions, the curves of cable length versus data signalling rate in Figure I.1 may be used for guidance. + +![Figure I.1/V.11: A log-log plot showing Cable length (m) versus Data signalling rate (bit/s) for balanced interchange circuits. The y-axis ranges from 10^1 to 10^4 m, and the x-axis ranges from 10^3 to 10^7 bit/s. Curve 1 (Terminated interchange circuit) is a horizontal line at 10^3 m from 10^3 to 10^5 bit/s, then slopes down to 10^1 m at 10^7 bit/s. Curve 2 (Unterminated interchange circuit) is a horizontal line at 10^3 m from 10^3 to 10^4 bit/s, then slopes down to 10^1 m at 10^6 bit/s. The legend indicates: Curve 1 Terminated interchange circuit, Curve 2 Unterminated interchange circuit. Reference: T1400260-93/d09.](ad29805cd4f64ad2828e14feb66de664_img.jpg) + +Curve 1 Terminated interchange circuit +Curve 2 Unterminated interchange circuit + +T1400260-93/d09 + +Figure I.1/V.11: A log-log plot showing Cable length (m) versus Data signalling rate (bit/s) for balanced interchange circuits. The y-axis ranges from 10^1 to 10^4 m, and the x-axis ranges from 10^3 to 10^7 bit/s. Curve 1 (Terminated interchange circuit) is a horizontal line at 10^3 m from 10^3 to 10^5 bit/s, then slopes down to 10^1 m at 10^7 bit/s. Curve 2 (Unterminated interchange circuit) is a horizontal line at 10^3 m from 10^3 to 10^4 bit/s, then slopes down to 10^1 m at 10^6 bit/s. The legend indicates: Curve 1 Terminated interchange circuit, Curve 2 Unterminated interchange circuit. Reference: T1400260-93/d09. + +FIGURE I.1/V.11 + +#### **Data signalling rate versus cable length for balanced interchange circuit** + +These curves are based upon empirical data using twisted pair telephone cable (0.51-mm wire diameter) both unterminated and terminated in a 100-ohm resistive load. The cable length restrictions shown by the curves are based upon the following assumed signal quality requirements at the load: + +- 1) signal rise and fall time equal to, or less than, one-half the duration of the signal element; +- 2) a maximum voltage loss between generator and load of 6 dB. + +At the higher data signalling rates (see Figure I.1), the sloping portion of the curves shows the cable length limitation established by the assumed signal rise and fall time requirements. The cable length has been arbitrarily limited to 1000 metres by the assumed maximum allowable loss of 6 dB. + +These curves assume that the environmental limits specified in this Recommendation have been achieved. At the higher data signalling rates, these conditions are more difficult to attain due to cable imperfections and common-mode noise. Operation within the data signalling rate and distance bounds of Figure I.1 will usually ensure that distortion of the signal appearing at the receiver input will be acceptable. Many applications, however, can tolerate much greater levels of signal distortion and in these cases correspondingly greater cable lengths may be employed. + +Experience has shown that in many practical cases the operating distance at lower signalling rates may extend to several kilometres. + +For synchronous transmission where the data and signal element timing are transmitted in opposite directions, the phase relationship between the two may need to be adjusted to ensure conformity with the relevant requirements of signal quality at the interchange point. + +### **I.3 Cable termination** + +The use of a cable termination resistance ( $Z_t$ ) is optional and dependent on the specific application. At the higher data signalling rates (above 200 kbit/s) or at any data signalling rate where the cable propagation delay is of the order of half the signal element duration, a termination should be used to preserve the signal rise time and minimize reflections. The terminating impedance should match as closely as possible the cable characteristic impedance in the signal spectrum. + +Generally, a resistance in the range of 100 to 150 ohms will be satisfactory, the higher values leading to lower power dissipation. + +At the lower data signalling rates, where distortion and rise-time are not critical, it may be desirable to omit the termination in order to minimize power dissipation in the generator. + +# **Appendix II** + +## **Multipoint operation** + +For further study. A specification for multipoint operation including the version ISO 8482 is under study. + +## **Reference** + +- [1] CCITT Recommendation X.24 (1988), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE) on public data networks.* + +## ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +- Series A Organization of the work of the ITU-T +- Series B Means of expression +- Series C General telecommunication statistics +- Series D General tariff principles +- Series E Telephone network and ISDN +- Series F Non-telephone telecommunication services +- Series G Transmission systems and media +- Series H Transmission of non-telephone signals +- Series I Integrated services digital network +- Series J Transmission of sound-programme and television signals +- Series K Protection against interference +- Series L Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant +- Series M Maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits +- Series N Maintenance: international sound-programme and television transmission circuits +- Series O Specifications of measuring equipment +- Series P Telephone transmission quality +- Series Q Switching and signalling +- Series R Telegraph transmission +- Series S Telegraph services terminal equipment +- Series T Terminal equipments and protocols for telematic services +- Series U Telegraph switching +- Series V Data communication over the telephone network** +- Series X Data networks and open system communication +- Series Z Programming languages \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da054a441ae0918668bfdfe51ec494b4ef198615 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2c6a1c1fad74f87b39b734516af552eae1ecb7ad61a76816d7e458f4754878e7 +size 75286 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0846bd356583beca8d40fd256f49ff083cea53fb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5beb2cd4d19ad664a064c13895e2586190bb124b0631064ea890d2e7c09634bd +size 23491 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9ae5648088ac0fbd060cc8e6ea7174e1ef7dda1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cf9933443982ad12ed6f24f9b9497d15c7abc38183efc7cbbc27329e52d2ed87 +size 8324 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/575d7d345b3ec04393bb2ec720ebabca_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/575d7d345b3ec04393bb2ec720ebabca_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16c45d7b1012a80ab841626c4420a861bdf151ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/575d7d345b3ec04393bb2ec720ebabca_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d325bab0e58430910a1515da298aa574f4dfc2531ddbc694f5b660506bf32407 +size 61196 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/63e0c22852c26699d0bd095a2d796bab_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/63e0c22852c26699d0bd095a2d796bab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be8b43e8d7847cbc2c758505f755f6105e988d55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/63e0c22852c26699d0bd095a2d796bab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cc3e66cc6a23d1af02c60e6684b38d5098e6f2cc7d06278243b4c789dcfd0a6d +size 24487 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/69e5f1993021af230d08c08aac97d9df_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/69e5f1993021af230d08c08aac97d9df_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a0b75909e2c5c399a370d09c7f632fa5eff4763 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/69e5f1993021af230d08c08aac97d9df_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4af73b8e5dc95c82b4f529f548da30bfa19a35a1997bcb93b4630ed52b3c4f24 +size 10722 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fca724941e5f3cdea51dce9b2f9beb32de5f2173 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f83a5a0b4df54f97fc9cb549169da96255870cddce5077a39790d2119a9eccb3 +size 157001 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8f9d6df99821b025d344367909b09caced4c3cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7be88eced6ae95d5a3a98cdd56622a478c02fd6ba1573922f3a000aab1d9677a +size 21877 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0502773b357bfc43f10855a8659be675ebd2a29 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e4731a6a898425cd2ec340992ebff3d5d313abd7ddca4399dc5ac8e498efaaba +size 77289 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df934e466d1a6062c03e7ae2acf521f6f006f198 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2a416b548c881c3f22cbd2b1c84f744e97c3306eaae26ac4c6cae35e72b90732 +size 72800 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a057800564be3506d2d87b6a4daee25b_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a057800564be3506d2d87b6a4daee25b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0718455ee486d289ad524df447f6e6a02620862 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a057800564be3506d2d87b6a4daee25b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1cb56e29aee3b81622d2cd356a7081a772892091897d9e8931d651fa122b090a +size 70434 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5fc53d28fdeaaf58d63156d237473e441e2577a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dff4eca65684f8655b06daea678dbd2a6680d7761d63dd1a536ca3466ca3d9aa +size 117136 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ad29805cd4f64ad2828e14feb66de664_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ad29805cd4f64ad2828e14feb66de664_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd71dee1e1e31cd29d8234edbc1a9bf90e1918fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ad29805cd4f64ad2828e14feb66de664_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e71ce3107dc4c668c34ede9420fb772d57d77c4b589fd3344209626ae97e2f79 +size 84311 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ae0dd5533e0b7fd2db452b5e2fdf8e5b_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ae0dd5533e0b7fd2db452b5e2fdf8e5b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70a73585535792a99781a4508096a154143d5acc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/ae0dd5533e0b7fd2db452b5e2fdf8e5b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d42818fdc2f215add7369f08446b1df8e94773d631cf22959eb58927fee8100c +size 33306 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b05fbb6a015ea153c1e25245772b1a1b_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b05fbb6a015ea153c1e25245772b1a1b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fea448bf90c39bfff22c9216e5e4effed1ffc738 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b05fbb6a015ea153c1e25245772b1a1b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:36b5db9a3c70df132141be79aa55241154a4832f22ece513d0d64bd233a70696 +size 98772 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7f753f135b0fb48403ea614e6194ec17733e213 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b96681ec226c0d9ca03f98e6cafd85492ff870a91c0665bfb981a9d9549aa6d8 +size 228309 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/be3e5fe8be7cc5a74f67a4b8ac93193d_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/be3e5fe8be7cc5a74f67a4b8ac93193d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a57ce3c90330b172d44251e6f8cb12bb4ce3c80 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/be3e5fe8be7cc5a74f67a4b8ac93193d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cb3d8e3695fb7d5730755bba586cae2acbed92bc78864b7871e1082d6590d555 +size 9903 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c6c88fc1f19a9662049163d2f887495c7697096 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b8dd3bf4de542de2f1118f6d6c3b273627141cb1723dd6bd66cde18c18a2a39a +size 1607 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcc0a3660abfac49b5de2859d92424d9931d3683 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:764a693121281c855b9751e5b44bbd6234967d05267b165d9e605a72e7d847de +size 186906 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9ee9ffc22494d38464436ff87cb4cd94aaaf051 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a2c987d6d382482f3aa9c94afcd3d42bb2875a23c413557c6055ab12beb3b48f +size 23044 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69680a0fbc4126c43b97bf1081bbeec6ba3b1076 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bec5afd19914fe28842b398ebcb6e6dfa616ab269e5f1a7361a71bc244fd1b1c +size 43581 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/eb03559a4d92ea9ebd63ea9be663c50a_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/eb03559a4d92ea9ebd63ea9be663c50a_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a57dfb23ba459501acd0ae579df27b1305c9596 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/eb03559a4d92ea9ebd63ea9be663c50a_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:275f2dbcd0d0dc761baa9f5db96abe64689843905d2f927e45c76a24f3486922 +size 34082 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/f5deee2f3301ee351c4008283ffafbb3_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/f5deee2f3301ee351c4008283ffafbb3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9227a84a54af7ef2091195de67978b9aaa151c66 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/f5deee2f3301ee351c4008283ffafbb3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:514ca4a53ccd5b84c22aebdb3221352c82430604c573737a5ea3f84962038f59 +size 46607 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1f9a6e226e6bc342954d97d3f882b8a7bc2bf22 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.110-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,2514 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.110 + +(02/2000) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interworking with other networks + +--- + +**Support by an ISDN of data terminal equipments +with V-series type interfaces** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.110 + +(Formerly CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +## **SUPPORT BY AN ISDN OF DATA TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS WITH V-SERIES TYPE INTERFACES** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation defines terminal adaptor (TA) functions for the connection of terminals having interfaces conforming to current V-series Recommendations to the ISDN for both circuit switched and leased circuit services. This includes the following functions: + +- conversion of electrical and mechanical interface characteristics; +- bit rate adaption; +- end-to-end synchronization of entry to and exit from the data transfer phase; +- call establishment and disestablishment based on either manual or automatic calling and/or automatic answering; +- local and end-to-end flow control to support DTEs of differing rates. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.110 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 16 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on 17 February 2000. + +# FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2000 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 2 | +| 3 | Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| 4 | Reference configurations ..... | 4 | +| 4.1 | Terminal adaptor reference model ..... | 4 | +| 4.2 | Connection types..... | 4 | +| 5 | Line signals at S and T reference points ..... | 4 | +| 5.1 | Bit rate adaption of synchronous data signalling rates up to 38.4 kbit/s..... | 4 | +| 5.1.1 | General approach..... | 4 | +| 5.1.2 | Adaption of V-series data signalling rates to the intermediate rates ..... | 5 | +| 5.1.3 | Frame synchronization and additional signalling capacity..... | 11 | +| 5.1.4 | Adaption of intermediate rates to 64 kbit/s ..... | 13 | +| 5.2 | Rate adaption of 48 and 56 kbit/s synchronous user rates to 64 kbit/s ..... | 13 | +| 5.2.1 | Frame synchronization..... | 14 | +| 5.3 | Adaption for asynchronous rates of up to 38 400 bit/s ..... | 15 | +| 5.3.1 | General approach..... | 15 | +| 5.3.2 | Supported asynchronous user rates..... | 15 | +| 5.3.3 | Asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion (RA0)..... | 16 | +| 5.3.4 | Overspeed/underspeed..... | 16 | +| 5.3.5 | Break signal ..... | 16 | +| 5.3.6 | Parity bits ..... | 17 | +| 5.4 | Flow control for use with TAs supporting asynchronous DTEs..... | 17 | +| 5.4.1 | Local flow control: between TA and DTE ..... | 17 | +| 5.4.2 | End-to-end (TA-to-TA) flow control..... | 18 | +| 5.4.3 | Use of channel capacity ..... | 18 | +| 5.4.4 | Requirements of a TA supporting flow control..... | 19 | +| 6 | Interchange circuits..... | 19 | +| 6.1 | Essential and optional interchange circuits..... | 19 | +| 6.2 | Timing arrangement..... | 20 | +| 6.3 | Circuit 106 ..... | 20 | +| 6.4 | Circuit 109 ..... | 20 | +| 6.5 | Electrical/mechanical characteristics of interchange circuits ..... | 20 | +| 6.5.1 | Basic ISDN user/network interface ..... | 20 | +| 6.5.2 | TE2/TA (DTE/DCE) interface ..... | 21 | +| 6.6 | Fault condition on interchange circuits..... | 21 | + +| | Page | +|------------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| 7 | Operating sequence..... 21 | +| 7.1 | TA duplex operation ..... 21 | +| 7.1.1 | Idle (or ready) state ..... 22 | +| 7.1.2 | Connect TA to line state ..... 22 | +| 7.1.3 | Data transfer state ..... 23 | +| 7.1.4 | Disconnect mode ..... 23 | +| 7.1.5 | Loss of frame synchronization..... 24 | +| 7.2 | TA half-duplex operation..... 24 | +| 7.3 | Automatic calling..... 25 | +| 8 | Network-independent clocks ..... 25 | +| 8.1 | Measurement of phase differences..... 25 | +| 8.2 | Positive/negative compensation..... 27 | +| 8.3 | Encoding ..... 27 | +| 9 | In-band parameter exchange state..... 27 | +| 10 | Testing facilities..... 27 | +| Annex A | – Reference configurations ..... 27 | +| A.1 | Introduction..... 27 | +| A.2 | V.110 terminal adaptor reference model..... 27 | +| A.3 | Terminal adaption type ..... 28 | +| A.3.1 | Terminal adaptor – Type A (TA-A) ..... 28 | +| A.3.2 | Terminal adaptor – Type B (TA-B)..... 29 | +| A.4 | Types of end-to-end connection..... 29 | +| Appendix I | – In-band parameter exchange ..... 30 | +| I.1 | Introduction..... 30 | +| I.2 | Definitions ..... 31 | +| I.3 | Overview..... 31 | +| I.4 | Reference configuration..... 32 | +| I.5 | Procedures..... 32 | +| I.5.1 | General..... 32 | +| I.5.2 | Initiating the exchange..... 33 | +| I.5.3 | Parameter exchange..... 34 | +| I.5.4 | Re-synchronization to a new intermediate rate..... 36 | +| I.5.5 | Data transfer..... 37 | +| I.5.6 | Interworking with a TA not supporting IPE ..... 37 | +| I.5.7 | Maintenance..... 37 | +| I.5.8 | Re-entering IPE from the data transfer state..... 38 | + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| I.5.9 Error protection and handling..... | 38 | +| I.6 Coding..... | 38 | +| I.6.1 General..... | 38 | +| I.6.2 Rate adaption version identification ..... | 40 | +| I.6.3 Control ..... | 41 | +| I.6.4 Parameters ..... | 41 | +| I.6.5 Status ..... | 44 | +| I.6.6 Maintenance..... | 44 | +| I.7 Timer values ..... | 45 | +| I.7.1 Timer values for parameter exchange..... | 45 | +| I.7.2 Timer values for maintenance ..... | 45 | +| I.8 State transition diagrams..... | 46 | +| I.8.1 General..... | 46 | +| Appendix II – V.25 bis to Q.931 protocol mapping..... | 51 | +| II.1 General..... | 51 | +| II.2 Call origination ..... | 52 | +| II.2.1 Call set-up..... | 52 | +| II.2.2 Call received from remote DTE/TA ..... | 52 | +| II.3 Call clearing (Figures II.2 and II.3)..... | 53 | +| II.3.1 DISCONNECT (from TA) ..... | 53 | +| II.3.2 DISCONNECT (from exchange)..... | 53 | +| II.3.3 DISCONNECT (In-band between TAs)..... | 55 | +| II.3.4 RELEASE COMPLETE..... | 55 | +| II.3.5 Negative response to an incoming call ..... | 55 | +| II.4 Direct call..... | 56 | +| II.4.1 Direct call DTE call set-up and clearing..... | 56 | +| II.4.2 Direct call DCE call set-up and clearing ..... | 56 | +| II.5 Mapping of Q.931 causes to V.25 bis call failure indications and responses..... | 57 | +| II.6 Additional information for handling of exception situations..... | 59 | +| II.6.1 Call collision..... | 59 | +| II.6.2 No channel available..... | 59 | +| II.6.3 Premature call clearing ..... | 59 | + + + +# Recommendation V.110 + +# SUPPORT BY AN ISDN OF DATA TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS WITH V-SERIES TYPE INTERFACES + +*(Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984; amended at Melbourne, 1988; +revised at Geneva in 1992, 1996 and 2000)* + +# 1 Scope + +The ITU-T, + +*considering* + +- a) that the ISDN will offer the universal interfaces to connect subscriber terminals according to the reference configuration described in Recommendation I.411; +- b) that during the evolution of ISDN, however, there will exist for a considerable period data terminal equipments (DTEs) with V-series type interfaces which have to be connected to the ISDN; +- c) that bearer services supported by an ISDN are described in Recommendation I.211; +- d) that the D-channel signalling protocol is described in Recommendations I.430, Q.921 and Q.931, + +*unanimously declares the view* + +- 1 that the scope of this Recommendation shall cover the connection of terminals with interfaces for modems conforming to current V-series Recommendations on the ISDN operating in accordance with circuit switched or leased circuit services; +- 2 that the following circuit switched service capabilities shall be supported: + - data transmission; (and optionally) + - automatic calling and/or automatic answering; +- 3 that the reference configurations of clause 4 shall apply; +- 4 that the support of interworking of terminal equipments (TEs) on an ISDN with DTEs on other types of networks, e.g. public switched telephone network (PSTN), is described in the I.500-series Recommendations; +- 5 that the terminal adaptor (TA) functions necessary to support the connection of DTEs with V-series type interfaces on an ISDN shall include the following: + - conversion of electrical and mechanical interface characteristics; + - bit rate adaption; + - end-to-end synchronization of entry to and exit from the data transfer phase; + - call establishment and disestablishment based on either manual or automatic calling and/or automatic answering; +- 6 that optionally, the following may be included: + - local and end-to-end flow control to support DTEs of differing bit rates. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- ITU-T Recommendation I.211 (1993), *B-ISDN service aspects*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.411 (1993), *ISDN user-network interfaces – Reference configurations*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.430 (1995), *Basic user-network interface – Layer 1 specification*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.431 (1993), *Primary rate user-network interface – Layer 1 specification*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.460 (1999), *Multiplexing, rate adaption and support of existing interfaces*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.463 (1996), *Support by an ISDN of data terminal equipments with V-series type interfaces*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.515 (1993), *Parameter exchange for ISDN interworking*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.530 (1993), *Network interworking between an ISDN and a public switched telephone network (PSTN)*. +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.921 (I.441) (1997), *ISDN user-network interface – Data link layer specification*. +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (I.451) (1998), *ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.10 (X.26) (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates nominally up to 100 kbit/s*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.11 (X.27) (1996), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.14 (1993), *Transmission of start-stop characters over synchronous bearer channels*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.24 (1996), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between data terminal equipment (DTE) and data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE)*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.25 bis (1996), *Synchronous and asynchronous automatic dialling procedures on switched networks*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.28 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.43 (1998), *Data flow control*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.54 (1988), *Loop test devices for modems*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.1 (1996), *International user classes of service in, and categories of access to, public data networks and Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDNs)*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.21 (1992), *Interface between Data Terminal Equipment and Data Circuit-terminating Equipment for synchronous operation on public data networks*. + +- ITU-T Recommendation X.30 (I.461) (1993), *Support of X.21, X.21 bis and X.20 bis based Data Terminal Equipments (DTEs) by an Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN)*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.150 (1988), *Principles of maintenance testing for public data networks using Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) test loops*. +- ISO/IEC 2110:1989, *Data communication – 25-pole DTE/DCE interface connector and contact number assignments*. +- ISO/IEC 2593:1993, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – 34-pole DTE/DCE interface connector mateability dimensions and contact number assignments*. +- ISO 4902:1989, *Information technology – Data communication – 37-pole DTE/DCE interface connector and contact number assignments*. +- ISO/IEC 11569:1993, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – 26-pole interface connector mateability dimensions and contact number assignments*. + +# 3 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|---------|------------------------------------------------| +| CFI | Call Failure Indication | +| CRI | Call Request with Identification | +| CRN | Call Request with Number | +| DC | Device Control | +| DC1 | Device Control one | +| DC3 | Device Control three | +| DCE | Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment | +| DTE | Data Terminal Equipment | +| DTR | Data Terminal Ready | +| IA5 | International Alphabet No. 5 | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| ISO | International Organization for Standardization | +| IWF | Interworking Function | +| NT | Network Termination | +| PARAM-X | Parameter X (X = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) | +| ppm | parts per million | +| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network | +| RA | Rate Adaption | +| RD | Received Data | +| TA | Terminal Adaptor | +| TA-A | Terminal Adaptor – Type A | +| TA-B | Terminal Adaptor – Type B | + +| | | +|-----|---------------------------| +| TD | Transmitted Data | +| TE | Terminal Equipment | +| TE1 | Terminal Equipment type 1 | +| TE2 | Terminal Equipment type 2 | +| TH | Threshold | +| Tn | Timer n (n = 1, 2, 3) | + +# **4 Reference configurations** + +## **4.1 Terminal adaptor reference model** + +The terminal adaptor functions have been defined in the context of a simple reference model. Annex A describes the reference model in further detail, and defines a basic terminal adaptor TA-A, and an auto-calling/auto-answering terminal adaptor TA-B. + +## **4.2 Connection types** + +The terminal adaptor functions described in this Recommendation take into account interworking between TAs of different types, e.g. V-series TE2 with X.21 TE2, and end-to-end connections of different types. These are described in further detail in Annex A. + +# **5 Line signals at S and T reference points** + +The TA signals at ISDN reference points S or T shall be in conformance with the characteristics of an ISDN's "Basic user/network interface" as described in Recommendations I.430 (layer 1 specification), Q.921 (layer 2 specification) and Q.931 (layer 3 specification). + +## **5.1 Bit rate adaption of synchronous data signalling rates up to 38.4 kbit/s** + +### **5.1.1 General approach** + +The bit rate adaption functions within the TA are shown in Figure 1. The function RA1 converts the user data signalling rate to an appropriate intermediate rate expressed by $2^k \times 8$ kbit/s (where $k = 0, 1, 2$ or $3$ ). RA2 performs the second conversion from the intermediate rates to 64 kbit/s. The data signalling rates of 48 and 56 kbit/s are converted directly into the 64-kbit/s B-channel rate. The intermediate rate of 64 kbit/s is directly mapped into the 64-kbit/s B-channel rate. + +![Diagram of the two-step bit rate adaption process within a Terminal Adaptor (TA).](63e0c22852c26699d0bd095a2d796bab_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows the internal structure of a Terminal Adaptor (TA) for bit rate adaption. + +- On the left, a vertical dashed line marks the 'R' reference point with 'V-series' input. + +- Inside the TA box, there are two functional blocks: RA1 and RA2. + +- RA1 is a square block with a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right. The top-left area is labeled 'V-series' and the bottom-right area is labeled ' $2^k \times 8$ kbit/s'. + +- RA2 is a similar square block with a diagonal line. The top-left area is labeled ' $2^k \times 8$ kbit/s' and the bottom-right area is labeled '64 kbit/s'. + +- A dotted line connects the output of RA1 to the input of RA2. + +- On the right, a vertical dashed line marks the 'S/T' reference point. + +- The diagram is labeled with the reference number 'T1701650-92' at the bottom right. + +Diagram of the two-step bit rate adaption process within a Terminal Adaptor (TA). + +**Figure 1/V.110 – Two-step bit rate adaption** + +### 5.1.2 Adaption of V-series data signalling rates to the intermediate rates + +The intermediate rate used with each of the V-series data signalling rates are shown in Table 1. + +**Table 1/V.110 – First step rate adaption** + +| Data signalling rate (bit/s) | Intermediate rate | | | | +|------------------------------|-------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------| +| | 8 kbit/s | 16 kbit/s | 32 kbit/s | 64 kbit/s | +| 600 | X | | | | +| 1 200 | X | | | | +| 2 400 | X | | | | +| 4 800 | X | | | | +| 7 200 | | X | | | +| 9 600 | | X | | | +| 12 000 | | | X | | +| 14 400 | | | X | | +| 19 200 | | | X | | +| 24 000 | | | | X | +| 28 800 | | | | X | +| 38 400 | | | | X | + +#### 5.1.2.1 Frame structure + +The frame structure is shown in Table 2 and is described in the following paragraphs. + +**Table 2/V.110 – Frame structure** + +| Octet number | Bit number | | | | | | | | +|--------------|------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | S1 | +| 2 | 1 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | X | +| 3 | 1 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | S3 | +| 4 | 1 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D22 | D23 | D24 | S4 | +| 5 | 1 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 6 | 1 | D25 | D26 | D27 | D28 | D29 | D30 | S6 | +| 7 | 1 | D31 | D32 | D33 | D34 | D35 | D36 | X | +| 8 | 1 | D37 | D38 | D39 | D40 | D41 | D42 | S8 | +| 9 | 1 | D43 | D44 | D45 | D46 | D47 | D48 | S9 | + +As shown in Table 2, the conversion of the V-series rates to the intermediate rates uses an 80-bit frame. The octet zero contains all binary 0, whilst octet 5 consists of a binary 1 followed by seven E bits (see 5.1.2.4). Octets 1-4 and 6-9 contain a binary 1 in bit number 1, a status bit (S- or X-bit) in bit number 8 and six data bits (D-bits) in bit positions 2-7. The order of bit transmission is from left to right and top to bottom. + +#### 5.1.2.2 Frame synchronization + +The 17-bit frame alignment pattern consists of all 8 bits (set to binary 0) of octet zero and bit one (set to binary 1) of the following nine octets (see also 5.1.3). + +#### 5.1.2.3 Status bits (S1, S3, S4, S6, S8, S9 and X) + +The bits S and X may be used to convey channel control information associated with the data bits in the data transfer state, as shown in Table 3. The S-bits are put into two groups SA (= S1, S3, S6, S8) and SB (= S4, S9), permitting the carriage of the condition of two interchange circuits. The X-bit is used to control the condition of circuit 106, and, in addition, signals the state of frame synchronization between TAs (see clause 7). The X-bit can also be used optionally to carry flow control information between TAs supporting asynchronous terminal equipment. This usage is specified in 5.4.2. + +**Table 3/V.110 – General mapping scheme at the TA during the data transfer state** + +| V.24 interchange circuit at DTE/TA interface | Status bit mapping – Direction: TA to ISDN | Status bit mapping – Direction: ISDN to TA | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------| +| 105 (Note 3) | Mapped to SB | | +| 106 (Note 1) | | Mapped from X | +| 107 | | Mapped from SA | +| 108 | Mapped to SA | | +| 109 | | Mapped from SB | +| 133 (Note 3) | Mapped to X (Note 2) | | +| NOTE 1 – The condition of circuit 106 may also be affected by the state of any transmit buffer in the TA if end-to-end flow control is supported.
NOTE 2 – The condition of status bit X towards the ISDN may also be affected by the state of any receive buffer in the TA if end-to-end flow control is supported.
NOTE 3 – Circuits 105 and 133 are assigned to the same connector pin on the standardized 25- and 26-pole connectors (ISO/IEC 2110 and ISO/IEC 11569). As circuit 133 is used only in duplex operation and circuit 105 is used only in half-duplex operation, there should be no conflict. The status bit corresponding to the unassigned circuit shall be set to the ON condition during the data transfer state. | | | + +The use of S- and X-bits for synchronization of entry to and exit from the data transfer state is specified in clause 7. + +Table 3 shows the general mapping scheme in the TA between the status bits and the V.24 interchange circuits at the DTE-TA interface during the data transfer state. Which circuits are actually mapped depends on the interoperational case (see A.4) and whether the DTE's mode of operation is duplex (see 7.1) or half duplex (see 7.2). + +The mapping between the status bits and the modem (DCE) control circuits in an interworking function (IWF) is the same as in Table 3 except the directions of the mappings are reversed. For example, circuit 109 is an output from the IWF modem (DCE) and is mapped to status bit SB towards the ISDN. + +For the S- and X-bits, a ZERO corresponds with the ON condition of the respective interchange circuit, a ONE with the OFF condition. + +Control information, conveyed by the S-bits, and user data, conveyed by the D-bits, should not have different transmission delays. The S-bits should therefore transmit control information sampled simultaneously with the D-bits in the positions specified in Table 4 and as presented in Figure 2. + +The X-bit should be presented upon arrival to control circuit 106. Circuit 106 shall respond as defined in 6.3 and, if the X-bit carries flow control information, in 7.2. + +**Table 4/V.110 – Coordination between S-bits and D-bits** + +| S-bit | D-bit | | +|-------|-----------|---------| +| | Octet No. | Bit No. | +| S1 | 2 | 3 (D8) | +| S3 | 3 | 5 (D16) | +| S4 | 4 | 7 (D24) | +| S6 | 7 | 3 (D32) | +| S8 | 8 | 5 (D40) | +| S9 | 9 | 7 (D48) | + +![Timing diagram showing coordination between S-bits and D-bits (Part 1)](ad29805cd4f64ad2828e14feb66de664_img.jpg) + +The top part of Figure 2 shows the timing relationship between circuits 103, 105, 108, 104, 109, and 107 relative to the 8, 16 or 32 kbit/s bearer on the B-channel. Sampling points for circuits 105 and 108 are marked with asterisks at bit positions 1 and 24 of the B-channel frame. Change points for circuits 107 and 109 are shown at time t0 and t1. + +Timing diagram showing coordination between S-bits and D-bits (Part 1) + +![Timing diagram showing coordination between S-bits and D-bits (Part 2)](b05fbb6a015ea153c1e25245772b1a1b_img.jpg) + +The bottom part of Figure 2 continues the timing diagram, showing the next sequence of bits. It illustrates the transition at time t1 and t2, with sampling points and change points aligned with specific bit positions in the B-channel frame (bits 1-48 and 1-2). + +Timing diagram showing coordination between S-bits and D-bits (Part 2) + +\* Indicates the sampling point for circuit 105 and 108 + +Image: Crossed lines symbol + + Indicates the change point for circuits 107 and 109 + +NOTE 1 – In order to maintain conformity with the bit rate adaption of X.1 user classes of service described in Recommendation X.30, the bits S1 and S6, S3 and S8, S4 and S9 are used to convey channel status information associated with the P-, Q- and R-bit groups respectively. + +Refer to 2.1.1.2.3/X.30 for detailed information concerning the mapping of the information on circuit C of the X.21 interface to the S-bits and to the I-bits of the distant interface. + +NOTE 2 – The coordination between S- and D-bits described in Table 4 and in this figure is intended to provide for compatibility with Recommendation X.30. Whether this coordination is strictly necessary in the context of this Recommendation is for further study. + +**Figure 2/V.110 – Coordination between S-bits and D-bits** + +8 Recommendation V.110 (02/2000) + +#### 5.1.2.4 E-bit usage + +The E-bits are used to carry the following information: + +- a) *Rate repetition information:* Bits E1, E2 and E3, in conjunction with the intermediate rate (see Table 2), provide the user data signalling rate (synchronous) identification. The coding of these bits shall be as shown in Table 5. +- b) *Network-independent clock information:* Bits E4, E5 and E6 are used as specified in clause 8 to carry network-independent clock phase information. +- c) *Multiframe information:* Bit E7 is used as indicated in Table 5. + +**Table 5/V.110 – E-bit usage (Note 1)** + +| Intermediate rates kbit/s | | | | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +|---------------------------|-------|--------|--------|----------|----|----------|----|----|----|--------------------| +| 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | (Note 4) | | (Note 3) | | | | | +| bit/s | bit/s | bit/s | bit/s | | | | | | | | +| 600 | | | | 1 | 0 | 0 | C | C | C | 1 or 0
(Note 2) | +| 1200 | | | | 0 | 1 | 0 | C | C | C | 1 | +| 2400 | | | | 1 | 1 | 0 | C | C | C | 1 | +| | | 12 000 | 24 000 | 0 | 0 | 1 | C | C | C | 1 | +| | 7200 | 14 400 | 28 800 | 1 | 0 | 1 | C | C | C | 1 | +| 4800 | 9600 | 19 200 | 38 400 | 0 | 1 | 1 | C | C | C | 1 | + +NOTE 1 – The data signalling rates of 600, 2400, 4800 and 9600 bit/s are also X.1 user classes of service (see also Recommendation X.30). + +NOTE 2 – In order to maintain compatibility with Recommendation X.30, the 600 bit/s user rate E7 is coded to enable the $4 \times 80$ bit multiframe synchronization. To this end, E7 in the fourth 80-bit frame is set to binary 0 (see 5.1.2.7 and Table 6a). + +NOTE 3 – C indicates the use of E4, E5 and E6 for the transport of network-independent clocking information (see clause 8). These bits shall be set to ONE when unused. + +NOTE 4 – Synchronous rate information is carried by bits E1, E2 and E3 as indicated. Asynchronous rate information must be provided with out-of-band signalling (layer 3 messages in the D-channel) or with in-band parameter exchange as described in Appendix I. + +#### 5.1.2.5 Rate negotiation + +Negotiation of the synchronous rate may be appropriate in interworking situations involving interconnections with modems on the PSTN where the remote modem/DTE has the capability of operating at different rates depending upon the conditions. It may also be appropriate in interconnections for asynchronous transmission specified in 5.3 and accommodate split rate operation. The need for rate negotiation and the method is for further study. + +#### 5.1.2.6 Data bits + +Data are conveyed in D-bits, i.e. up to 48 bits per 80-bit frame. In this Recommendation the octet boundaries of the user's data stream are not defined. + +#### 5.1.2.7 Bit assignment + +The adaption of 600, 1200 and 2400 bit/s rates to the 8 kbit/s intermediate rate are shown in Tables 6a, 6b and 6c, respectively. + +The adaption of 7200, 14 400 and 28 800 bit/s rates to the 16, 32 and 64 kbit/s intermediate rate, respectively, use the data bit assignments shown in Table 6d. + +The adaption of 4800, 9600, 19 200 and 38 400 bit/s rates to the 8, 16, 32 and 64 kbit/s intermediate rate, respectively, use the data bit assignments shown in Table 6e. + +The adaption of 12 000 and 24 000 bit/s user rate to 32 and 64 kbit/s intermediate rate, respectively, use the data bit assignments shown in Table 6f. + +**Table 6a/V.110 – Adaption of 600 bit/s user rate to 8 kbit/s intermediate rates** + +| | | | | | | | | +|---|----|----|----|----|----|----|------------------| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | S1 | +| 1 | D1 | D1 | D2 | D2 | D2 | D2 | X | +| 1 | D2 | D2 | D2 | D2 | D3 | D3 | S3 | +| 1 | D3 | D3 | D3 | D3 | D3 | D3 | S4 | +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 a) | +| 1 | D4 | D4 | D4 | D4 | D4 | D4 | S6 | +| 1 | D4 | D4 | D5 | D5 | D5 | D5 | X | +| 1 | D5 | D5 | D5 | D5 | D6 | D6 | S8 | +| 1 | D6 | D6 | D6 | D6 | D6 | D6 | S9 | + +a) See Note 2 to Table 5. + +**Table 6b/V.110 – Adaption of 1200 bit/s user rate to 8 kbit/s intermediate rates** + +| | | | | | | | | +|---|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | D1 | D2 | D2 | S1 | +| 1 | D2 | D2 | D3 | D3 | D3 | D3 | X | +| 1 | D4 | D4 | D4 | D4 | D5 | D5 | S3 | +| 1 | D5 | D5 | D6 | D6 | D6 | D6 | S4 | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 1 | D7 | D7 | D7 | D7 | D8 | D8 | S6 | +| 1 | D8 | D8 | D9 | D9 | D9 | D9 | X | +| 1 | D10 | D10 | D10 | D10 | D11 | D11 | S8 | +| 1 | D11 | D11 | D12 | D12 | D12 | D12 | S9 | + +**Table 6c/V.110 – Adaption of 2400 bit/s user rate to 8 kbit/s intermediate rates** + +| | | | | | | | | +|---|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D1 | D2 | D2 | D3 | D3 | S1 | +| 1 | D4 | D4 | D5 | D5 | D6 | D6 | X | +| 1 | D7 | D7 | D8 | D8 | D9 | D9 | S3 | +| 1 | D10 | D10 | D11 | D11 | D12 | D12 | S4 | +| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 1 | D13 | D13 | D14 | D14 | D15 | D15 | S6 | +| 1 | D16 | D16 | D17 | D17 | D18 | D18 | X | +| 1 | D19 | D19 | D20 | D20 | D21 | D21 | S8 | +| 1 | D22 | D22 | D23 | D23 | D24 | D24 | S9 | + +**Table 6d/V.110 – Adaption of $N^{a)} \times 3600$ bit/s user rate to the intermediate rate** + +| | | | | | | | | +|---|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | S1 | +| 1 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | F | F | X | +| 1 | D11 | D12 | F | F | D13 | D14 | S3 | +| 1 | F | F | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | S4 | +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 1 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D22 | D23 | D24 | S6 | +| 1 | D25 | D26 | D27 | D28 | F | F | X | +| 1 | D29 | D30 | F | F | D31 | D32 | S8 | +| 1 | F | F | D33 | D34 | D35 | D36 | S9 | + +a) $N = 2, 4$ or $8$ only. + +F Fill bit + +NOTE – This table is not used for asynchronous user rates of $N \times 3600$ bit/s (see 5.3.3). + +**Table 6e/V.110 – Adaption of $N^{a)} \times 4800$ bit/s +user rate to the intermediate rate** + +| | | | | | | | | +|---------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | S1 | +| 1 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | X | +| 1 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | S3 | +| 1 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D22 | D23 | D24 | S4 | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 1 | D25 | D26 | D27 | D28 | D29 | D30 | S6 | +| 1 | D31 | D32 | D33 | D34 | D35 | D36 | X | +| 1 | D37 | D38 | D39 | D40 | D41 | D42 | S8 | +| 1 | D43 | D44 | D45 | D46 | D47 | D48 | S9 | +| a) N = 1, 2, 4 or 8 only. | | | | | | | | + +**Table 6f/V.110 – Adaption of $N^{a)} \times 12\,000$ bit/s +user rate to the intermediate rate** + +| | | | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | S1 | +| 1 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | F | F | X | +| 1 | D11 | D12 | F | F | D13 | D14 | S3 | +| 1 | F | F | D15 | F | F | F | S4 | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | E4 | E5 | E6 | E7 | +| 1 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | S6 | +| 1 | D22 | D23 | D24 | D25 | F | F | X | +| 1 | D26 | D27 | F | F | D28 | D29 | S8 | +| 1 | F | F | D30 | F | F | F | S9 | +| a) N = 1 or 2 only.
F Fill bit
NOTE – This table is not used for asynchronous user rates of $N \times 12\,000$ bit/s (see 5.3.3). | | | | | | | | + +### 5.1.3 Frame synchronization and additional signalling capacity + +#### 5.1.3.1 Search for frame synchronization + +The following 17-bit alignment pattern is used to achieve frame synchronization: + +``` + +00000000 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY +1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY 1YYYYYYY + +``` + +The bits marked 'Y' are not part of the frame alignment pattern. They carry the user data (D bits) and S and X status bits as shown in Table 2. To ensure a reliable synchronization, it is recommended that at least two 17-bit alignment patterns in consecutive frames be detected. + +Once frame synchronization is achieved, it is recommended that a persistence check be made of the status bits $S = X = \text{OFF}$ condition of 7.1.2 prior to proceeding to transparent data transfer with the status bits $S = X = \text{ON}$ condition, as shown in Figure 3 and described in clause 7. + +![Sequence diagram showing TA synchronization of entry to and exit from data transfer phase between two TE2 entities via a B-channel. The diagram is divided into three main sections: Entry to data phase, Data phase, and Exit from data phase. It details the states of various signals (108.1/2, 105, 107, 106, 109) and the status of the B-channel connection and TA disconnection procedure.](b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the synchronization of entry to and exit from the data transfer phase between two TE2 entities (TE2 CALLING and TE2 CALLED) via a B-channel. The sequence is as follows: + +- Initial State:** B-channel connection established. Both TA entities are in a state where 108.1/2 = ON, 105 = ON, 107 = OFF, 106 = OFF, and 109 = OFF. +- Entry to data phase:** + - Both TA entities initiate a "Frame search". + - During the search, the status of 107 changes to ON, which stops the search process ("Stopped by 107 ON"). + - Once the search is stopped, the status of 105 changes to ON/OFF. +- Data phase:** + - The data transfer phase begins with the status of 108.1/2 changing to OFF. + - The status of 105 remains OFF. + - The status of 107 remains ON, 106 remains 105, and 109 remains ON. +- Exit from data phase:** + - The data transfer phase ends with the status of 108.1/2 changing to OFF. + - The status of 105 remains OFF. + - The status of 107 changes back to OFF, 106 changes back to 105, and 109 changes back to OFF. +- Final State:** B-channel disconnection. Both TA entities return to the initial state where 108.1/2 = ON, 105 = ON, 107 = OFF, 106 = OFF, and 109 = OFF. + +**Legend:** + +- B-channel connection of TA +- ⊗ B-channel disconnection of TA +- × Bidirectional switch-through TE2 +- > < Bidirectional disconnection of TE2 +- △ TA disconnecting procedure according to 7.1.4 started + +Sequence diagram showing TA synchronization of entry to and exit from data transfer phase between two TE2 entities via a B-channel. The diagram is divided into three main sections: Entry to data phase, Data phase, and Exit from data phase. It details the states of various signals (108.1/2, 105, 107, 106, 109) and the status of the B-channel connection and TA disconnection procedure. + +T1701430-92 + +**Figure 3/V.110 – TA synchronization of entry to and exit from data transfer phase** + +#### 5.1.3.2 Frame synchronization monitoring and recovery + +Monitoring of the frame synchronization shall be a continuous process using the same procedures as for initial detection. + +Loss of frame synchronization shall not be assumed unless at least three consecutive frames, each with at least one framing bit error, are detected. + +Following loss of frame synchronization, the TA shall enter a recovery state as discussed in 7.1.5. If recovery is not successful, further maintenance procedures may be used. + +### 5.1.4 Adaption of intermediate rates to 64 kbit/s + +Since rate adaption of a single intermediate rate (e.g. 8, 16, or 32 kbit/s) to the 64 kbit/s B-channel rate and the possible multiplexing of several intermediate rate streams1 to the 64 kbit/s B-channel rate must be compatible to enable interworking, a common approach is needed for the second step rate adaption and, possibly, for intermediate rate multiplexing. This second step rate adaption method is described in Recommendation I.460. + +## 5.2 Rate adaption of 48 and 56 kbit/s synchronous user rates to 64 kbit/s + +The 48 and 56 kbit/s user data signalling rates are adapted to the 64 kbit/s B-channel rate in one step as indicated in Tables 7a, 7b or 7c respectively. + +**Table 7a/V.110 – Adaption of 48 kbit/s user rate to 64 kbit/s** + +| Octet number | Bit number | | | | | | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +| 1 | 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | S1 | +| 2 | 0 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | X | +| 3 | 1 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | S3 | +| 4 | 1 | D19 | D20 | D21 | D22 | D23 | D24 | S4 | +| NOTE 1 – 48 kbit/s is also a X.1 user class of service (see also 2.2.1/X.30). | | | | | | | | | +| NOTE 2 – Refer to 5.1.2.3 for the use of status bits and bit X; however for international operation over restricted 64-kbit/s bearer capabilities, bit X must be set to binary 1. | | | | | | | | | + +1 Multiplexing of several intermediate rate streams is for further study. + +**Table 7b/V.110 – Adaption of 56 kbit/s user rate to 64 kbit/s** + +| Octet number | Bit number | | | | | | | | +|--------------|------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|---| +| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +| 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | 1 | +| 2 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | 1 | +| 3 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | 1 | +| 4 | D22 | D23 | D24 | D25 | D26 | D27 | D28 | 1 | +| 5 | D29 | D30 | D31 | D32 | D33 | D34 | D35 | 1 | +| 6 | D36 | D37 | D38 | D39 | D40 | D41 | D42 | 1 | +| 7 | D43 | D44 | D45 | D46 | D47 | D48 | D49 | 1 | +| 8 | D50 | D51 | D52 | D53 | D54 | D55 | D56 | 1 | + +**Table 7c/V.110 – Alternative frame structure for the adaption of 56 kbit/s user rate to 64 kbit/s** + +| Octet number | Bit number | | | | | | | | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|----| +| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +| 1 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | 0 | +| 2 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | X | +| 3 | D15 | D16 | D17 | D18 | D19 | D20 | D21 | S3 | +| 4 | D22 | D23 | D24 | D25 | D26 | D27 | D28 | S4 | +| 5 | D29 | D30 | D31 | D32 | D33 | D34 | D35 | 1 | +| 6 | D36 | D37 | D38 | D39 | D40 | D41 | D42 | 1 | +| 7 | D43 | D44 | D45 | D46 | D47 | D48 | D49 | 1 | +| 8 | D50 | D51 | D52 | D53 | D54 | D55 | D56 | 1 | +| NOTE 1 – Refer to 5.1.2.3 for the use of status bits and bit X. | | | | | | | | | +| NOTE 2 – This table is a permitted option to provide for signalling to enter and to leave the data phase. However, the recommended approach shall be as in Table 7b and the responsibility shall be on the user of this table to ensure that interworking can be achieved. | | | | | | | | | + +### 5.2.1 Frame synchronization + +At the user data signalling rate of 48 kbit/s, the frame alignment pattern consists of 1011 in bit 1 of consecutive octets of one frame. To ensure reliable synchronization, it is suggested that at least five 4-bit alignment patterns in consecutive frames be detected. + +At the user data signalling rate of 56 kbit/s with the alternative frame structure according to Table 7c, the frame alignment pattern consists of 0YYY1111 in bit 8 of consecutive octets of one frame. Bits marked with Y may be either "0" or "1". To ensure a reliable synchronization, it is suggested that at least four 5-bit (01111) alignment patterns in the 8-bit sequence of 0YYY1111 in consecutive octets be detected. + +Frame synchronization monitoring and recovery is described in 5.1.3.2. + +## 5.3 Adaption for asynchronous rates of up to 38 400 bit/s + +### 5.3.1 General approach + +The bit rate adaption functions within the TA are shown in Figure 4. A three-step method is employed with the functional blocks RA0, RA1, and RA2. The RA0 function is an asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion step, for support of the rates specified in Table 8, using the same technique as defined in Recommendation V.14. It produces a synchronous bit stream defined by $2^n \times 600$ bit/s (where $n = 0$ to 6). The functions RA1 and RA2 are the same as specified in 5.1. Function RA1 adapts the user rate to the next higher rate expressed by $2^k \times 8$ kbit/s (where $k = 0, 1, 2$ or 3). RA2 performs the second conversion to 64 kbit/s. + +![Figure 4/V.110 – Three-step rate adaption bit. The diagram shows a three-step process for rate adaptation. Step 1 (RA0) is 'Stop bit manipulation', converting an asynchronous rate R to a synchronous rate of 2^n x 600 bit/s. Step 2 (RA1) is a rate adaptation block that takes the synchronous rate and outputs a rate of 2^k x 8 bit/s. Step 3 (RA2) is another rate adaptation block that takes the rate from Step 2 and outputs a final rate of 64 bit/s. The input is R and the output is S/T. The diagram is labeled T1701670-92.](eb03559a4d92ea9ebd63ea9be663c50a_img.jpg) + +Figure 4/V.110 – Three-step rate adaption bit. The diagram shows a three-step process for rate adaptation. Step 1 (RA0) is 'Stop bit manipulation', converting an asynchronous rate R to a synchronous rate of 2^n x 600 bit/s. Step 2 (RA1) is a rate adaptation block that takes the synchronous rate and outputs a rate of 2^k x 8 bit/s. Step 3 (RA2) is another rate adaptation block that takes the rate from Step 2 and outputs a final rate of 64 bit/s. The input is R and the output is S/T. The diagram is labeled T1701670-92. + +Figure 4/V.110 – Three-step rate adaption bit + +### 5.3.2 Supported asynchronous user rates + +The asynchronous user rates to be supported, mandatory and optional, are specified in Table 8. + +Table 8/V.110 – Asynchronous user rates + +| Data rate
(bit/s) | Rate tolerance
(%) | Number of
data units | Number of
stop elements | RA0/RA1 rate
(bit/s) | RA1 rate
(kbit/s) | +|----------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------| +| 50 | ±2.5 | 5 | 1.5 | 600 | 8 | +| 75 | ±2.5 | 5, 7 or 8 | 1, 1.5 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 110 | ±2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 150 | ±2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 200 | ±2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 300* | ±2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 600* | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 600 | 8 | +| 1 200* | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 1 200 | 8 | +| 2 400* | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 2 400 | 8 | +| 3 600 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 4 800 | 8 | +| 4 800* | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 4 800 | 8 | +| 7 200 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 9 600 | 16 | +| 9 600* | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 9 600 | 16 | +| 12 000 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 19 200 | 32 | +| 14 400 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 19 200 | 32 | +| 19 200 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 19 200 | 32 | + +**Table 8/V.110 – Asynchronous user rates (*concluded*)** + +| Data rate
(bit/s) | Rate tolerance
(%) | Number of
data units | Number of
stop elements | RA0/RA1 rate
(bit/s) | RA1 rate
(kbit/s) | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------| +| 24 000 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 38 400 | 64 | +| 28 800 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 38 400 | 64 | +| 38 400 | +1 – 2.5 | 7 or 8 | 1 or 2 | 38 400 | 64 | +| NOTE 1 – * indicates rate whose support is mandatory for universal TA. | | | | | | +| NOTE 2 – Number of data bits includes possible parity bits. | | | | | | + +### 5.3.3 Asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion (RA0) + +The RA0 function is only used with asynchronous V-series interfaces. Incoming asynchronous data is padded by the addition of stop elements to fit the nearest channel rate defined by $2^n \times 600$ bit/s. Thus, a 7200 bit/s user data signalling rate shall be adapted to a synchronous 9600 bit/s stream and a 110 bit/s user data signalling rate shall be adapted to synchronous 600 bit/s stream. The resultant synchronous stream is fed to RA1. Padding with stop elements is inhibited during the transmission of the break signal as described in 5.3.5. + +### 5.3.4 Overspeed/underspeed + +A terminal adaptor shall insert additional stop elements when its associated terminal is transmitting with a lower than nominal character rate. If the terminal is transmitting characters with an overspeed of up to 1% (or 2.5% in the case of nominal speeds lower than 600 bit/s), the asynchronous-to-synchronous converter may delete stop elements as often as is necessary to a maximum of one every eight characters at 1% overspeed. The converter on the receiving side shall detect deleted stop elements and re-insert them in the received data stream (circuit 104). + +The nominal length of the start elements and data units shall be the same for all characters. The length of the stop element may be reduced as much as 12.5% by the receiving converter for nominal speeds exceeding 300 bit/s to allow for overspeed in the transmitting terminal. For nominal speeds less than or equal to 300 bit/s, a 25% reduction in stop element is allowed. + +### 5.3.5 Break signal + +The terminal adaptor shall detect and transmit the break signal as follows: + +If the converter detects M to $2M + 3$ bits, all of start polarity, where M is the number of bits per character in the selected format including start and stop elements, the converter shall transmit $2M + 3$ bits of start polarity. + +If the converter detects more than $2M + 3$ bits, all of start polarity, the converter shall transmit all these bits as start polarity. + +For the cases where the asynchronous rate is lower than the synchronous rate for the converter, the following rules shall apply: + +- the converter shall transmit start polarity (to RA1) for a time period equal to $2M + 3$ bits at the asynchronous rate if the converter has detected M to $2M + 3$ bits of start polarity; +- the converter shall transmit (to RA1) start polarity for a time period as long as the received break condition if the converter has detected more than $2M + 3$ bits of start polarity; +- the $2M + 3$ or more bits of start polarity received from the transmitting side shall be output to the receiving DTE; + +- the DTE must transmit on circuit 103 at least 2M bits of stop polarity after the start polarity break signal before sending further data characters. The converter shall then regain character synchronism from the following stop to start transition. + +### **5.3.6 Parity bits** + +Possible parity bits included in the user data are considered as data bits by the RA0 function. + +## **5.4 Flow control for use with TAs supporting asynchronous DTEs** + +A flow control option, for use with TAs supporting asynchronous DTEs, is described in this subclause. Flow control allows the connection of asynchronous DTEs operating at different user data rates by reducing the character output of the faster to that of the slower. Support of flow control will require the use of the end-to-end (TA-to-TA) protocol defined in 5.4.2 and an incoming line (from network) buffer in addition to a selected local protocol (see 5.4.1). Depending upon the local flow control protocol employed, there will also be a requirement for character buffering from the DTE interface. The size of this buffer is not defined in this Recommendation because it is dependent upon implementation. Criteria for buffer dimensioning may be found in Recommendation V.43. + +Local flow control of the DTE interface is required where the DTE operates at a rate higher than the synchronous rate established between TAs. End-to-end flow control is required where the synchronous rate established between TAs is consistent with the operating rate of one DTE (or interworking unit) and higher than the synchronous rate consistent with the operating rate of the other DTE (or interworking unit). Both local and end-to-end flow control could be required in some applications. + +### **5.4.1 Local flow control: between TA and DTE** + +Connection may be made between TAs connected to asynchronous DTEs operating at two different character rates. It is the responsibility of the TA connected to the faster DTE to execute a local flow control protocol to reduce the character rate to that of the slower DTE. This operation will require some buffer storage in the TA. A TA may support several different local flow control protocols, although only one will be selected at any one time. There are a number of such protocols in use, some of which are detailed in the following subclauses. DTE-DCE flow control mechanisms are described in detail in Recommendation V.43. + +#### **5.4.1.1 133/106 operation** + +This is a bidirectional (DCE and DTE control each other) out-of-band flow control mechanism, utilizing two of the interchange circuits specified in Recommendation V.24. A DCE not-ready condition is indicated by turning circuit 106 OFF and cleared by turning circuit 106 (ready for sending) ON. A DTE not-ready condition is indicated by an ON-to-OFF transition and cleared by an OFF-to-ON transition of circuit 133 (ready for receiving). + +#### **5.4.1.2 105/106 operation** + +This is a unidirectional (DCE controls DTE) out-of-band flow control mechanism, utilizing two of the interchange circuits specified in Recommendation V.24. If a DTE requires to transmit a character, it turns ON circuit 105 (request to send). The DTE can only begin transmission when it receives in return circuit 106 ON (ready for sending). If, during transmission of a block of characters circuit 106 goes OFF, the DTE shall cease transmission (after completing the transmission of any character of which transmission has started) until circuit 106 turns ON again. + +NOTE – The apparent conflict between this and 7.1.2.4 (Note 1) and 7.1.3.1 a) is for further study. + +#### **5.4.1.3 XON/XOFF operation** + +This is an in-band flow control mechanism using two characters of the International Alphabet No. 5 (IA5) set for XON and XOFF operation. It may be used either unidirectionally (DCE controls DTE) or bidirectionally (DCE and DTE control each other). If a DTE (or DCE) receives an XOFF character, it shall cease transmission. When it receives an XON character, it may resume transmission. The characters typically used for XON and XOFF are device control one (DC1) and device control three (DC3) (bit combinations 1/1 and 1/3 in Recommendation T.50) respectively, although alternative bit combinations can be used. + +#### **5.4.1.4 Other methods** + +Alternative and non-standard methods of asynchronous flow control are in use, and these may be mapped onto the TA flow control protocol. + +### **5.4.2 End-to-end (TA-to-TA) flow control** + +Matching (by reduction) of the transmitted character rate of the DTE to the rate of the TA is not sufficient in all cases to guarantee correct operation, and end-to-end flow control may be required. + +The X-bit is used to carry flow control information. A TA will buffer incoming characters. When the number of buffered characters exceeds a threshold TH1, depending upon implementation, the TA will set the X-bit of its outgoing frames to OFF. + +Upon receipt of a frame containing an X-bit set to OFF, a TA will execute its selected local flow control procedure indicating that the attached DTE must stop sending characters, and cease the transmission of data after completion of the character in progress by setting the data bits in the outgoing frames to ONE. + +When the buffer contents of a TA which has initiated an end-to-end flow control drops below threshold TH2, the TA will reset the outgoing X-bit to ON. + +When the far-end TA receives a frame with the X-bit set to ON, it will recommence data transmission, and, by use of the local flow control procedure, indicate to the attached DTE that it may continue. + +NOTE – There may be a delay between initiation of the end-to-end flow control protocol and termination of the incoming character stream. The characters arriving during this time must be buffered, and the total buffer size will depend upon the character rate, round-trip delay and the buffer threshold. + +### **5.4.3 Use of channel capacity** + +Upon accepting a call from a TA supporting flow control and operating at a different user rate and/or intermediate rate, the called TA will adopt the identical intermediate rate and bit repetition factor. This will override the parameters normally selected. In such cases, the TA connected to the faster DTE will execute a local flow control procedure to reduce the character rate to that of the slower DTE. + +Thus, if a faster DTE calls a slower DTE, the faster intermediate channel rate and bit repetition factor will be adopted by the TAs on both ends. To reduce the character rate received by the slower DTE, its TA will exercise end-to-end flow control and cause the TA on the calling side to utilize local flow control. + +If a slower DTE calls a faster DTE, the slower intermediate channel rate and bit repetition factor will be adopted by the TAs on both ends. To reduce the character rate transmitted by the faster DTE, its TA will exercise local flow control. + +If the called TA does not implement the intermediate rate and bit repetition factor used by the calling TA, the call shall be rejected. + +### 5.4.4 Requirements of a TA supporting flow control + +The following are general requirements for a TA supporting flow control: + +- i) A TA supporting flow control shall be capable of operating with an intermediate rate and bit repetition factor that is independent of the asynchronous speed used at its DTE interface. +- ii) A TA supporting flow control shall, if possible, adapt to the intermediate rate and bit repetition factor required for an incoming call. User rate information will be obtained from signalling. +- iii) A TA supporting flow control shall be capable of executing a local flow control protocol to reduce the character rate to that of the far-end DTE. +- iv) A TA supporting flow control will support the use of end-to-end (TA-to-TA) flow control using the X-bit, and will contain a character buffer. + +# 6 Interchange circuits + +## 6.1 Essential and optional interchange circuits + +The essential and optional interchange circuits are listed in Table 9. + +**Table 9/V.110** + +| Interchange circuit (Note 1) | | | +|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------| +| Number | Description | Notes | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | | +| 102a | DTE common return | 2 | +| 102b | DCE common return | 2 | +| 103 | Transmitted data | | +| 104 | Received data | | +| 105 | Request for sending | 3, 8 | +| 106 | Ready for sending | | +| 107 | Data set ready | | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | 4 | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready | 4 | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | | +| 113 | Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source) | 5 | +| 114 | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source) | | +| 115 | Receiver signal element timing (DCE source) | | +| 125 | Calling indicator | 6 | +| 133 | Ready for receiving | 7, 8 | +| 140 | Loopback/maintenance test | 9 | +| 141 | Local loopback | 9 | +| 142 | Test indicator | 9 | + +**Table 9/V.110 (concluded)** + +NOTE 1 – All essential circuits and any others which are provided shall comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits provided shall be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment and in the data circuit-terminating equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see 6.5). + +NOTE 2 – Interchange circuits 102a and 102b are required where the electrical characteristics defined in Recommendation V.10 are used at data signalling rates above 20 kbit/s. + +NOTE 3 – Not required for DTEs designed to operate with DCEs in the continuous carrier (duplex) mode and where in addition the DTE is not intended to exhibit out-of-band flow control (see 5.4). + +NOTE 4 – This circuit shall be capable of operating as circuit 108/1 or 108/2, depending on its use (by the associated DTE). + +NOTE 5 – The use of circuit 113 is for further study since its application is restricted by the synchronous nature of ISDN. + +NOTE 6 – This circuit is used with the automatic answering terminal adaptor function. + +NOTE 7 – Required for duplex DTEs that use bidirectional out-of-band (133/106) flow control. + +NOTE 8 – Circuits 105 and 133 are assigned to the same connector pin on the standardized 25- and 26-pole connectors (ISO/IEC 2110 and ISO/IEC 11569). As circuit 133 is used only in duplex operation and circuit 105 is used only in half duplex operations, there should be no conflict. + +NOTE 9 – The use for loopback testing is for further study. + +## **6.2 Timing arrangement** + +The TA shall derive ISDN timing from the received bit stream of the ISDN's basic user/network interface (see clauses 5/I.430 and 8/I.430). This network timing shall be used by the TA to provide the DTE with transmitter signal element timing on circuit 114 and receiver signal element timing on circuit 115. + +## **6.3 Circuit 106** + +After the start-up and retrain synchronization sequences, the ON state of circuit 106 shall be delayed relative to the ON state of circuit 105 (where implemented) by an interval of at least $N$ bits (a value of $N$ equal to 24 has been proposed, but the value is for further study). ON to OFF state transitions of circuit 106 shall follow ON to OFF state transitions of circuit 105 (when implemented) by less than 2 ms. Where circuit 105 is not implemented, the initial circuit 106 transition to the ON state shall be delayed by an interval greater than or equal to $N$ bits relative to the corresponding transition in the state of circuit 109. Subsequent transitions in the state of circuit 106 should occur solely in accordance with the operating sequences defined in clause 7, or when used for the optional flow control defined in 5.4. + +## **6.4 Circuit 109** + +OFF to ON and ON to OFF transitions of circuit 109 should occur solely in accordance with the operating sequence defined in clause 7. + +## **6.5 Electrical/mechanical characteristics of interchange circuits** + +### **6.5.1 Basic ISDN user/network interface** + +The electrical and mechanical characteristics of the basic ISDN user/network interface are described in clauses 8/I.430 and 10/I.430. + +### **6.5.2 TE2/TA (DTE/DCE) interface** + +#### **6.5.2.1 Rates less than or equal to 19.2 kbit/s** + +Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendations V.28 is recommended together with the connector and pin assignment plans specified by ISO/IEC 2110 and ISO/IEC 11569. + +#### **6.5.2.2 Rates greater than 19.2 kbit/s** + +Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendations V.10 and/or V.11 is recommended together with the use of the connector and pin assignment plan specified by ISO 4902. + +- i) Concerning circuits 103, 104, 113, 114 and 115, both the generators and the receivers shall be in accordance with Recommendation V.11. +- ii) In the case of circuits 105, 106, 107 and 109, generators shall comply with Recommendation V.10 or alternatively Recommendation V.11. The receivers shall comply with Recommendation V.10, category 1, or Recommendation V.11 without termination. +- iii) In the case of all other circuits, Recommendation V.10 applies, with receivers configured as specified by Recommendation V.10 for category 2. + +NOTE – Equipment may be encountered that uses the interface defined in Appendix II of former Recommendation V.35 (withdrawn) together with the connector and pin assignment plan specified by ISO/IEC 2593. + +## **6.6 Fault condition on interchange circuits** + +See clause 7/V.28 for association of the receiver failure detection types. + +**6.6.1** The DTE should interpret a fault condition on circuit 107 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +**6.6.2** The data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE) shall interpret a fault condition on circuits 105 and 108 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +**6.6.3** All other circuits not referred to above may use failure detection types 0 or 1. + +# **7 Operating sequence** + +Four interoperational cases for a V.110 TA are described in A.4. This clause describes the operating sequence for a V-series TE2 (DTE) communicating with another V-series TE2 via V.110 TAs connected through the ISDN. This clause also applies to the V-series TE2 side of the other three interoperational cases. + +The operating sequence is specified such that a pair of TAs connected via the ISDN shall exhibit behaviour (as observed at the DTE-DCE interfaces) that is equivalent to that exhibited by a pair of V-series modems interconnected via the PSTN. + +For a TA communicating with an interworking function, the behaviour observed at the TA's DTE-DCE interface is equivalent to that exhibited by a V-series modem. The detailed operating sequence is for further study. + +## **7.1 TA duplex operation** + +When using the TA to provide data transmission service within ISDN, the call is established over a 64-kbit/s connection using the procedures applicable to the particular network and/or terminal configuration. + +The internal arrangement of the TA functional parts and the DTE (with a V-series type interface) is not within the scope of this Recommendation. It is assumed that means are provided to control the entry to and the exit from the data transfer mode. For example, it is assumed that the means are provided to control circuits 108/1 (Connect data set to line) or 108/2 (Data terminal ready) internally, that is within the station at the customer premises. However, for the purpose of this Recommendation circuit 108/2, as defined in Recommendation V.24, is assumed. In this subclause, the SA and SB groups of status bits are treated as a single sequence of S-bits. + +NOTE – The operating sequence of a duplex V.110 TA has been specifically designed such that a V-series TE2 connected to the ISDN via a V.110 TA can interoperate with an X.21 TE2 connected via an X.30 TA. + +The operating sequence described in this clause is illustrated in Figure 3. + +### **7.1.1 Idle (or ready) state** + +**7.1.1.1** During the idle (or ready) state the TA (DCE) will be receiving the following from the DTE: + +- Circuit 103 = Continuous binary 1. +- Circuit 105 = See Note. +- Circuit 108/1 = OFF; circuit 108/2 = ON. + +NOTE – In many duplex DTEs circuit 105 is either permanently in the ON condition or it is not present. If not present, the function must be set in an ON condition in the TA. See 7.1.2.4 for the case where a duplex DTE can operate circuit 105. + +**7.1.1.2** During the idle (or ready) state the TA will transmit continuous binary 1s into the B- and D-channels (i.e. all bits of Table 2 = binary 1). + +**7.1.1.3** During the idle (or ready) state the TA (DCE) will transmit the following toward the DTE: + +- Circuit 104 = Continuous binary 1. +- Circuit 107 = OFF. +- Circuit 106 = OFF. +- Circuit 109 = OFF. + +### **7.1.2 Connect TA to line state** + +**7.1.2.1** When the TA is to be switched to the data mode, circuit 108 must be ON. Switching to the data mode causes the TA to transmit the following towards the ISDN (refer to Table 2): + +- a) frame synchronization pattern as described in 5.1.3.1 and 5.2.1; +- b) data bits = binary 1; +- c) status bits S = OFF and X = OFF (ON = binary 0, OFF = binary 1). + +NOTE 1 – At this time, circuit 103 is not connected to the data channel (e.g. the binary 1 condition of the data bits is generated within the TA). + +NOTE 2 – In the following description only the inter-operation between TE2/TA (DTE/DCE) interface and the intermediate rate frames (see Tables 6a to 6f) and the 64 kbit/s frame of Tables 7a and 7c are discussed. The second step of rate adaption encoding and decoding and the multiplexing and demultiplexing of the ISDN basic user/network interface are discussed in Recommendations I.460 and I.430, respectively. + +**7.1.2.2** At this time (i.e. switching to data mode) the receiver in the TA will begin to search for the frame synchronization pattern in the received bit stream (see 5.1.3.1 and 5.2.1) and start timer T1. A suggested value is 10 s (see I.7.1). + +**7.1.2.3** When the receiver recognizes the frame synchronization pattern, it causes the S- and X-bits in the transmitted frames to be turned ON (provided that circuit 108 is ON). + +**7.1.2.4** When the receiver recognizes that the status of bits S and X are in the ON condition, it will perform the following functions: + +- a) Turn ON circuit 107 toward the DTE and stop timer T1. + +NOTE 1 – A duplex DTE that implements and is able to operate circuit 105 may be expected to turn this circuit ON at any time. However, if not previously turned ON, it must be turned ON in response to the ON condition on circuit 107. + +- b) Then, circuit 103 may be connected to the data bits in the frame; however, the DTE must maintain a binary 1 condition on circuit 103 until circuit 106 is turned ON in the next portion of the sequence. +- c) Turn ON circuit 109 and connect the data bits to circuit 104. +NOTE 2 – Binary 1 is being received on circuit 104 at this time. +- d) After an interval of *N* bits (see 6.3), it will turn ON circuit 106. +- e) Circuit 106 transitioning from OFF to ON will cause the transmitted data to transition from binary 1 to the data mode. + +If circuit 107 has not been turned ON, after expiring of timer T1 the TA shall be disconnected according to the procedures specified in 7.1.4. + +### **7.1.3 Data transfer state** + +**7.1.3.1** While in the data transfer state, the following circuit conditions exist: + +- a) circuits 105 (when implemented), 107, 108/1 or 108/2 and 109 are in the ON condition; +- b) data is being transmitted on circuit 103 and received on circuit 104; +- c) circuits 133 (when implemented) and 106 are in the ON condition unless local out-of-band flow control is being used, in which case, either or both circuits may be in the ON or the OFF condition. + +**7.1.3.2** While in the data transfer state, the following status bit conditions exist: + +- a) status bits S in both directions are in the ON condition; +- b) status bits X in both directions are in the ON condition unless end-to-end flow control is being used, in which case status bit X in either or both directions may be in the ON or the OFF condition. + +**7.1.3.3** While in the data transfer state, for the interoperational cases not involving an interworking function (IWF): + +- a) the S status bits shall not be mapped to/from the interchange circuits according to Table 3; +- b) the X status bits shall not be mapped according to Table 3 unless end-to-end flow control is implemented. + +NOTE – Certain equipment designed prior to the publication of this version of V.110 may map one or both of the S status bits to/from the interchange circuits according to Table 3. + +The use of the S and X status bits in the data transfer state to carry status information to/from the modem in an IWF is for further study. + +### **7.1.4 Disconnect mode** + +**7.1.4.1** At the completion of the data transfer phase, the local DTE will indicate a disconnect request by turning OFF circuit 108. This will cause the following to occur: + +- a) the status bits S in the frame toward ISDN will turn OFF, status bits X are kept ON; +- b) circuit 106 will be turned OFF; +- c) the data bits in the frame will be set to binary 0. + +To guard against the failure of the remote TA to respond to the disconnect request, the local TA may start a timer T2 (suggested value 5 s) which is stopped by the reception or transmission of any D-channel clearing message (DISCONNECT, RELEASE, RELEASE COMPLETE). If the timer expires, the local TA should clear the call via the ISDN D-channel signalling protocol. + +**7.1.4.2** If circuit 108 is still ON at the remote TA, this TA will recognize the transition of the status bits S from ON to OFF and the data bits from data to binary 0 as a disconnect request and it will turn OFF circuits 107 and 109. This DTE should respond by turning OFF circuit 108 and transferring to disconnected mode. The disconnection will be signalled by the TA via the ISDN D-channel signalling protocol. At this time, the DTE/DCE interface should be placed in the idle (or ready) state. + +**7.1.4.3** The TA at the station that originated the disconnect request will recognize reception of S = OFF or the loss of framing signals as a disconnect acknowledgement and turn OFF circuits 107 and 109 and transfer to disconnected mode. The disconnection will be signalled by the TA via the ISDN D-channel signalling protocol. At this time, the DTE/DCE interface should be placed in the idle (or ready) state. + +### **7.1.5 Loss of frame synchronization** + +In the event of loss of frame synchronization, the (local) TA should attempt to resynchronize as follows: + +- a) Place circuit 104 in binary 1 condition (passes from the data mode). +- b) Turn OFF status bit X in the transmitted frame. +- c) The remote TA upon recognition of status bit X OFF will turn OFF circuit 106 which will cause the remote DTE to place circuit 103 in a binary 1 condition. +- d) The local TA should attempt to resynchronize on the incoming signal. +- e) If after an interval of three seconds the local TA cannot attain synchronization, it should send a disconnect request by turning OFF all of the status bits for several (at least three) frames with data bits set to binary 0 and then disconnect by turning OFF circuit 107 and transferring to the disconnected mode as discussed in 7.1.4.2. + +NOTE 1 – The values of three seconds and three frames are provisional and should be confirmed or amended after further study. + +- f) If resynchronization is achieved, the local TA should turn ON status bit X toward the distant station. +- g) If resynchronization is achieved, the TA (which has turned OFF circuit 106) should, after an interval of *N* bits (see 6.3), turn ON circuit 106. This will cause circuit 103 to change from binary 1 to the data mode. + +NOTE 2 – During a resynchronization attempt, circuits 107 and 109 should remain ON. + +## **7.2 TA half-duplex operation** + +The data call establishment for the interworking of half-duplex DTEs equipped with V-series type interfaces is the same as discussed in 7.1. The only difference between half-duplex operation is in the control of the circuits 105, 106, and 109, as follows. + +NOTE – This is a unique application; therefore, TA arranged for half-duplex operation will not be able to interwork with either a V-series or an X-series duplex DTE (TE2). + +**7.2.1** In a TA arranged to accommodate half-duplex DTEs, circuit 109 will be under the control of the status bits SB in the incoming frame, as follows: + +- a) If at the local interface circuit 109 is OFF and circuit 104 is in the binary 1 state, the DTE may "request to send" by turning ON circuit 105. + +- b) The TA will then turn ON status bits SB in the transmitted frame which will at the remote interface turn ON circuit 109 and connect circuit 104 to the data bit stream of the incoming frame. +- c) After an $N$ bit interval (see 6.3) the local TA will turn ON circuit 106, which will allow the local DTE to transmit data on circuit 103. +- d) Upon completion of the transmission, the local DTE will turn OFF circuit 105. This will in turn: + - turn OFF circuit 106 at the local interface, and circuit 103 will revert to the binary 1 state; + - turn OFF status bits SB which will in turn at the remote TA turn OFF circuit 109 and place circuit 104 in a binary 1 condition. +- e) At this time the remote DTE is able to reverse the sequence by turning ON circuit 105. + +## 7.3 Automatic calling + +The mapping of V.25 *bis* automatic calling and automatic answering procedures to the ISDN D-channel signalling protocols is described in Appendix II. + +# 8 Network-independent clocks + +In cases where synchronous data signals at user rates up to and including 19.2 kbit/s are received from outside the ISDN (e.g. through an interworking unit from a DTE/modem on the PSTN), the data may not be synchronized to the ISDN. Such a situation would exist where the signals are received through an interworking unit from voiceband data modems on the analogue PSTN, where the transmit data from the remote modem is synchronized to the modem clock (normal case for such applications). The frequency tolerance of such modems is 100 ppm. The following method shall be used to enable transfer of those data signals and the corresponding bit timing information via the 80-bit frame to the receiving TA. + +## 8.1 Measurement of phase differences + +The phase difference between the following two frequencies will be measured: + +- i) $R1 = 0.6 \times$ the nominal intermediate rate (except where Fill bits are used; see Note), synchronized with the ISDN; +- ii) $R2 = 0.6 \times$ the nominal intermediate rate (except where Fill bits are used; see Note), derived from and synchronized with the bit timing received from the remote synchronous source, e.g. modem. + +NOTE – Clocks R1 and R2 are nominally either 4800, 9600 or 19 200 Hz at 8 kbit/s, 16 kbit/s and 32 kbit/s intermediate rate, respectively. + +Where Fill bits are used, in the cases of 7200 and 14 400 bit/s R1 and R2 will have the same nominal rate as the user bit rate. + +Compensation will affect one, one-half, one-quarter or one-eighth of a user data bit, dependent upon the bit repetition factor. + +A state diagram for the transmitting TA showing the phase of R2 relative to R1 appears in Figure 5. Table 10 shows the related bit coding. + +![Figure 5/V.110 – Network-independent clocking state diagram](7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + 0["0%"] + P20["+20%"] + P40["+40%"] + M20["-20%"] + M40["-40%"] + + 0 <--> P20 + P20 <--> P40 + 0 <--> M20 + M20 <--> M40 + P40 -- "+" --> M40 + M40 -- "-" --> P40 + + subgraph FastClock [Fast clock R2 > R1] + FC_Arrow(( )) --> 0 + end + + subgraph SlowClock [Slow clock R2 < R1] + SC_Arrow(( )) --> 0 + end + +``` + +Detailed description: A circular state diagram with five states: 0% at the top, +20% and +40% on the left, -20% and -40% on the right. Double-headed arrows connect adjacent states (0 to +20, +20 to +40, 0 to -20, -20 to -40). A large curved arrow on the left labeled 'Fast clock (R2 > R1)' points downwards. A similar arrow on the right labeled 'Slow clock (R2 < R1)' points downwards. At the bottom, two curved arrows labeled 'Compensation' connect the +40% and -40% sides; the inner arrow is labeled '+' and the outer arrow is labeled '-'. Reference code T1701680-92 is in the lower right. + +Figure 5/V.110 – Network-independent clocking state diagram + +NOTE 1 – Phase measurements are given relative to R1 by the formula: Phase = phase (R2) – phase (R1). + +NOTE 2 – Receipt of a bit combination requiring an illegal move of more than one state will cause a legal move of one state in the appropriate direction. + +NOTE 3 – The initial state of both the receiving and transmitting sides of the TA will be 0%. + +**Figure 5/V.110 – Network-independent clocking state diagram** + +Comparison of R1 and R2 will give a phase difference relative to R1 which will be encoded as shown in Table 10. The resultant 3-bit code will be transmitted in bit positions E4, E5 and E6, and used for clock control at the receiving TA. + +**Table 10/V.110 – Coding of E-bits for network-independent clocking** + +| Displacement (in % of nominal R1 clock period at $n \times 4800$ bit/s, $n = 1, 2$ or $4$ ) | Coding in the 80-bit frame | | | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|----|----| +| | E4 | E5 | E6 | +| Nominally 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| +20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| +40 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +| -40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| -20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| Compensation control | | | | +| Positive compensation of a one | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| Positive compensation of a zero | 1 | 0 | 0 | +| Negative compensation | 1 | 1 | 0 | + +To avoid continuous jitter between neighbouring displacement positions, hysteresis shall be applied, as follows: + +The displacement code shall be changed only when the measured phase difference between R1 and R2 is 15% (of the R1 clock period) more or less than the difference indicated by the existing displacement code. + +*Example* – Bit combination 000 indicates a phase difference of nominally 20%. This bit combination will be changed into 001 when the measured phase difference is 35% or more, and into 111 when the measured phase difference is 5% or less. + +## **8.2 Positive/negative compensation** + +On transition from the +40% state to the –40% state, an extra user D-bit has to be transmitted in the 80-bit frame, using bit E6 (positive compensation). At the receiving TA, this extra bit will be inserted between D24 and D25 as shown in Table 2, immediately following the E-bits. + +On transition from the –40% state to the +40% state, a bit combination is transmitted in the 80-bit frame (E4, E5 and E6 = 1, 1, 0, respectively), indicating to the receiving TA that bit D25 of the 80-bit frame, being set to ONE, does not contain user data and should be removed (negative compensation). + +## **8.3 Encoding** + +The encoding of the measured phase difference for clock control and the positive/negative compensation control overrides and replaces the clock control coding. + +# **9 In-band parameter exchange state** + +The capabilities provided and operation in an optional in-band parameter exchange state are described in Appendix I. + +# **10 Testing facilities** + +The provision of maintenance test loops is for further study, taking in consideration Recommendations X.150 and V.54. + +# **ANNEX A** + +## **Reference configurations** + +## **A.1 Introduction** + +Figures A.1 and A.2 show the two basic reference models used in the development of this Recommendation, and provide valuable examples of the way in which the terminal adaptor may be used. These are provided simply as an aid to the interpretation of this Recommendation and should not be seen as restrictive in any way. + +## **A.2 V.110 terminal adaptor reference model** + +Figure A.1 shows the basic reference model for a V.110 terminal adaptor. + +![Figure A.1/V.110 – Terminal adaptor reference model diagram. The diagram shows a block diagram of a terminal adaptor. On the left, a box labeled 'TE2' is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'R'. This line connects to a large box labeled '(1)'. Box (1) is connected to two parallel boxes labeled '(2)' and '(3)'. These two boxes are connected to a large box labeled '(4)'. Box (4) is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'S/T', which is then connected to a box labeled 'NT'. The reference number 'T1701690-92' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.](e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg) + +Figure A.1/V.110 – Terminal adaptor reference model diagram. The diagram shows a block diagram of a terminal adaptor. On the left, a box labeled 'TE2' is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'R'. This line connects to a large box labeled '(1)'. Box (1) is connected to two parallel boxes labeled '(2)' and '(3)'. These two boxes are connected to a large box labeled '(4)'. Box (4) is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'S/T', which is then connected to a box labeled 'NT'. The reference number 'T1701690-92' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +NT Network Termination + +TE2 Data terminal equipment (DTE) with an interface complying to Recommendation V.24 + +(1) R interface functions (according to Recommendations V.24, V.28, etc.) + +(2) Specific TA functions (e.g. data rate adaption) + +(3) Control access signalling function (e.g. signalling in accordance with Recommendations Q.921 and Q.931, auto calling in accordance with Recommendation V.25 *bis*) + +(4) S/T interface layer 1 functions (according to Recommendation I.430) + +**Figure A.1/V.110 – Terminal adaptor reference model** + +The elements (1), (2), (3) and (4) shown in Figure A.1 represent the functionality required of a terminal adaptor. The elements are not intended to correspond to separate physical units. However, a terminal adaptor need not necessarily constitute a single physical unit. The functions of these elements are: + +- 1) Provision of layer 1, in accordance with Recommendations V.24 and V.28 or other applicable Recommendations and ISO/IEC 2110 or other applicable standards, of the interface at reference point R. +- 2) Specific TA functions, including the adaption of the TE2 data (rate and format) for transmission over an ISDN B-channel and provision of R-interface lead control information. This Recommendation covers primarily these functions. +- 3) Network control signalling functions, including the mapping of call control signals (in accordance with Recommendation V.25 *bis* or other applicable standard) at the R-interface into signals (according to Recommendation Q.931) for transmission on the D-channel across the S/T interface. +- 4) Provision of layer 1, in accordance with Recommendation I.430 of the interface at reference points S or T. + +## **A.3 Terminal adaption type** + +### **A.3.1 Terminal adaptor – Type A (TA-A)** + +The TA-A provides manual call control functions and the functions necessary for data transfer. The following data transfer functions are included: + +- a) Conversion of electrical, mechanical, functional and procedural characteristics of the V-series type interface(s) to those required by an ISDN at reference points S and/or T, as discussed in 6.5; +- b) Bit rate adaption of the V-series data signalling rates to the 64-kbit/s B-channel rate as described in 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3; +- c) End-to-end synchronization of entry to and exit from the data transfer phase, as described in clause 7. + +Terminal adaptor TA-A may be implemented using a physically separate TE1 for providing the network control signalling function, unit (3) in Figure A.1, or the function may be part of an integrated implementation. The function provides for data connection establishment when using the circuit-mode 64-kbit/s unrestricted bearer service. The function includes provisions for speech and data connection establishment when using for speech, both circuit-mode 64-kbit/s bearer service usable for 3.1-kHz audio information transfer, and, for data, the circuit-mode 64-kbit/s unrestricted bearer service concurrently on two B-channels. + +### **A.3.2 Terminal adaptor – Type B (TA-B)** + +The TA-B includes, in addition to those functions provided by a TA-A, the mapping functions necessary to convert the automatic calling and/or automatic answering procedures of Recommendation V.25 *bis* to the ISDN D-channel signalling protocol. This additional functionality is in functional unit (3) in Figure A.1. Terminal adaptor type B is to be used with the 64-kbit/s unrestricted bearer service. + +The need for provisions covering functional unit (3) in Figure A.1 for the implementation of a type B-terminal adaptor is for further study. + +NOTE – Reference to the use of the term "unrestricted bearer". During an interim period, some networks may only support restricted 64-kbit/s signal digital information transfer capability, i.e. information transfer capability solely restricted by the requirement that the all-zero octet is not allowed. Such networks may offer bearer services with restricted transport capabilities. + +## **A.4 Types of end-to-end connection** + +The terminal adaptor functions described in this Recommendation take into account the end-to-end connection types shown in Figure A.2. The figure shows the interoperational cases considered in this Recommendation, as follows: + +- V-series TE2 with V-series TE2; +- V-series TE2 with X.21 TE2; +- V-series TE2 with TE1; +- V-series TE2 with V-series DTE on the PSTN through an interworking function (IWF). + +NOTE – The adaption of terminals by the connection of modem-equipped TE2s to the analogue side of a CODEC to provide for the use of 3.1-kHz bearer capabilities is not addressed in this Recommendation. + +Interworking with PSTNs may be provided on the basis of a trunk interconnection using interworking functions (IWFs) (see Note 1 of Figure A.2). The reference connections illustrated in Figure A.2 do not envisage a direct connection between an ISDN in one country and a public switched telephone network (PSTN) in another country via a network-provided interworking function in the first country. However, access to non-ISDN countries could be through the normal PSTN international connections. + +![Figure A.2/V.100 – Network reference connections. The diagram shows three connection paths from a central 'ISDN' block. Path 1: TE2 (Terminal Equipment 2) connected to TA-V (Terminal Adaptor V-series) via an R (Reference) interface, which then connects to the ISDN via an S/T (Signalling/Terminal) interface. Path 2: TE2 connected to TA-X (Terminal Adaptor X.21 or X.21 bis) via an R interface, which then connects to the ISDN via an S/T interface. Path 3: TE1 (Terminal Equipment 1) connected to the ISDN via an S/T interface. From the ISDN, three paths emerge: 1. 'International transit' leading to 'To ISDN in another country'. 2. A path through TA-V to another TE2, with an S/T interface between ISDN and TA-V, and an R interface between TA-V and TE2. 3. A path through an IWF (Interworking Function) to 'To national PSTN (Note 2)'. The IWF is labeled '(Note 1)'. The reference T1701700-92 is at the bottom right.](e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg) + +Figure A.2/V.100 – Network reference connections. The diagram shows three connection paths from a central 'ISDN' block. Path 1: TE2 (Terminal Equipment 2) connected to TA-V (Terminal Adaptor V-series) via an R (Reference) interface, which then connects to the ISDN via an S/T (Signalling/Terminal) interface. Path 2: TE2 connected to TA-X (Terminal Adaptor X.21 or X.21 bis) via an R interface, which then connects to the ISDN via an S/T interface. Path 3: TE1 (Terminal Equipment 1) connected to the ISDN via an S/T interface. From the ISDN, three paths emerge: 1. 'International transit' leading to 'To ISDN in another country'. 2. A path through TA-V to another TE2, with an S/T interface between ISDN and TA-V, and an R interface between TA-V and TE2. 3. A path through an IWF (Interworking Function) to 'To national PSTN (Note 2)'. The IWF is labeled '(Note 1)'. The reference T1701700-92 is at the bottom right. + +IWF Interworking function + +TA-V Terminal adaptor function – (DTEs with V-series interfaces) + +TA-X Terminal adaptor function – (DTEs with X.21 or X.21 *bis* interfaces). See Recommendation X.30. + +NOTE 1 – The location of this interworking function is discussed in Recommendation I.510 and general requirements are given in Recommendations I.515 and I.530. The need for a Recommendation covering detailed requirements for such an IWF is for further study. + +NOTE 2 – For access to national non-ISDN terminals or international access to PSTNs of non-ISDN countries. + +**Figure A.2/V.100 – Network reference connections** + +# APPENDIX I + +## In-band parameter exchange + +## I.1 Introduction + +During the evolution of ISDN there will exist for a considerable period: + +- DTEs with V-series type interfaces which are to be connected to an ISDN by terminal adaptors; and +- requirements for interoperation between DTEs/TAs connected to ISDNs, that are interconnected with facilities which do not provide for the full ISDN out-of-band signalling capability necessary to support parameter exchange between terminal adaptors. + +Considering that Recommendation I.530 defines interworking between an ISDN and a PSTN in general, that Recommendation I.515 describes the parameter exchange for interworking between ISDNs and existing networks, the specific procedure to be used for in-band parameter exchange (IPE) within the context of terminal adaptors following this Recommendation is as described in this appendix. This procedure is consistent with Recommendations I.530 and I.515. + +It enhances the capability of V.110 TA in order to support: + +- the transfer of the end-to-end information required for the compatibility checking of data calls; +- an exchange of terminal adaptor parameter information; and +- an exchange of information related to maintenance operations. + +## I.2 Definitions + +For the IPE, which is described in this appendix, the following definitions apply. These definitions are ordered logically to minimize forward referencing. + +**I.2.1 TA:** A terminal adaptor. + +**I.2.2 calling TA:** The TA requesting the connection to be established. + +**I.2.3 called TA:** The TA accepting the connection. + +**I.2.4 originating TA:** The TA which is responsible for initiating the next exchange of parameter information. Initially, the calling TA takes on the role of the originating TA. + +**I.2.5 answering TA:** The TA which is not responsible for initiating the next exchange of parameter information. Initially, the called TA takes on the role of the answering TA. + +**I.2.6 parameter information:** Terminal adaption protocol information, TA parameters, and (optionally) maintenance information. + +**I.2.7 parameter block:** The complete set of parameter information structured into message groups which are transferred by each TA towards the other during each parameter exchange. + +**I.2.8 message group:** The arrangement of octets based on a repeated sequence of command octets followed by a series of three LOW-HIGH data octet pairs. Each message group transfers one octet of the parameter information. + +**I.2.9 sequence of command octets:** The repeated transmission of at least 32 command octets transmitted without interval for 64-kbit/s unrestricted and restricted channels. In the case of asynchronous IPE the sequence may be interrupted, within the limits of the procedures. + +**I.2.10 series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs:** The transmission of six octets grouped into three pairs of LOW-HIGH data octets, the LOW data octet being transmitted in each pair before the HIGH data octet. The six octets are transmitted without interval for 64-kbit/s unrestricted and restricted channels. In the case of asynchronous IPE, the transmission of the six octets may be interrupted, within the limits of the procedures. + +**I.2.11 verification:** Establishment of the validity of a piece of data according to the specified error handling procedures. + +## I.3 Overview + +The in-band parameter exchange (IPE) described in this appendix is based on the transfer of parameter information within the user data stream of an established connection. Specific IPE rates have been selected to cover the application of IPE to connections based on 64-kbit/s unrestricted channels, 64-kbit/s restricted channels and intermediate rate channels. For IPE at rates other than 64 kbit/s, rate adaption according to this Recommendation is applied to the user data stream containing the parameter information. + +In the case of IPE within intermediate rate channels, it is first necessary to achieve frame synchronization according to this Recommendation before the exchange can commence. The parameter information is transferred in a parameter block during one or more exchanges between the two TAs. The block structure is based on message groups, containing a sequence of command octets which identify the information carried in the message group, and a series of general purpose LOW-HIGH data octet pairs which carry the information. The command octets are always transmitted in a repeated sequence of at least 32 octets to allow persistency error handling techniques to be employed. The LOW-HIGH data octet pairs are always transmitted in a series of three to enable majority voting error recovery techniques to be used. + +After the first exchange of parameters, the called TA determines whether the parameter exchange has been successful. If it is, both TAs proceed to the data transfer state directly unless the agreed data transfer rate first requires re-synchronization to a new intermediate rate according to this Recommendation. After the first exchange, and each subsequent exchange, the responsibility for determining the success of the exchange is transferred, to allow the negotiation of parameters to progress evenly. Status information is also transferred during the IPE to enable both TAs to monitor the progression of the exchange. If at any time either TA concludes that a successful exchange of parameters cannot be achieved, the TA should clear the connection. + +Interworking with TAs not supporting IPE is specified. + +## I.4 Reference configuration + +Figure I.1 gives an example of a scenario for an IPE procedure. It illustrates the connection of ISDNs using the connectivity of existing networks. As the evolution towards an ubiquitous international ISDN capability proceeds, the connection of ISDN islands will often use existing network capabilities. Two alternatives are indicated in Figure I.1. Either arrangement indicated may exist though the use of "digital connectivity" based on the existing integrated digital network (IDN) has many advantages including the avoidance of the need for layer 1 interworking functions. The IDN, however, does not have the ISDN signalling capability and this leads to the need for an IPE procedure. The IPE capability is required to enable communicating TAs to exchange parameters as well as to perform other operations such as maintenance functions. Even where the ISDN signalling capability is available, the IPE capability may be used to provide enhanced parameter exchange. + +![Figure I.1/V.110 – Reference configuration diagram showing two ISDN networks connected via Digital connectivity (IDN) and PSTN, with various interworking functions (IWF) and terminal equipment (TE1, TE2, TA, DCE, DTE).](f5deee2f3301ee351c4008283ffafbb3_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates two ISDN networks connected via two different paths. The top path uses 'Digital connectivity (IDN)' with dashed boxes labeled 'IWF' (Interworking Function) at each end. The bottom path uses 'PSTN' (Public Switched Telephone Network) with solid boxes labeled 'IWF' at each end. Each ISDN network is connected to a TA (Terminal Adapter) and a TE1 (Terminal Equipment 1) via S/T interfaces. The TA is also connected to a TE2 via an R (Ring) interface. The PSTN path includes a DCE (Data Circuit-terminating Equipment) and a DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) connected via R interfaces. + +T1701710-92 + +Figure I.1/V.110 – Reference configuration diagram showing two ISDN networks connected via Digital connectivity (IDN) and PSTN, with various interworking functions (IWF) and terminal equipment (TE1, TE2, TA, DCE, DTE). + +**Figure I.1/V.110 – Reference configuration** + +## I.5 Procedures + +### I.5.1 General + +Subclause I.5 describes the procedures which permit a TA to exchange parameter and maintenance information in-band by using messages within the user data stream. + +Once the call has been established, the IPE is initiated at one of four user data rates as per Table I.1. It is recommended that, where possible, the IPE is performed using the unrestricted/restricted 64 kbit/s rate. If the TA is not capable of starting at this rate, then the appropriate default + +intermediate rate is used. Default intermediate-rate channels are selected according to this Recommendation for single stream operation described in Recommendation I.460. Subrate multiplexing cannot be supported until the IPE is complete. + +The final rate of data transfer is not restricted by the choice of IPE user rate. (See Table I.1.) It is therefore possible for an IPE at 4.8 kbit/s async, for example, to agree on the use of 64 kbit/s unrestricted during the data transfer state. For IPE at rates other than 64 kbit/s, rate adaption according to this Recommendation is applied to the user data stream containing the IPE information. In order to prevent unintended disconnection when rate adaption according to this Recommendation is used, it is necessary to avoid the condition S = OFF, X = ON and all the data bits set to ZERO. This is achieved by the use of asynchronous characters with one stop bit and the permanent setting of bit 8 in all octets to ONE. + +**Table I.1/V.110 – Selection of IPE user rate** + +| IPE intermediate rate | IPE data rate | +|--------------------------------------|----------------------| +| Unrestricted/restricted (64 kbit/s) | 56 kbit/s | +| 32 kbit/s intermediate-rate channel | 19.2 kbit/s async | +| 16 kbits/s intermediate-rate channel | 9.6 kbit/s async | +| 8 kbits/s intermediate-rate channel | 4.8 kbit/s async | + +Subclause I.5.2 describes how IPE is initiated, with the procedures for IPE itself described in I.5.3. If the parameter exchange results in the selection of a data rate based on a different intermediate rate to that used for IPE, re-synchronization is required. The procedures for re-synchronization and data transfer are given in I.5.4 and I.5.5 respectively. In I.5.6, the procedures for interworking with a TA not supporting IPE are given. In I.5.7 the procedures associated with maintenance are described. Subclause I.5.8 defines re-entry to IPE from the data transfer state, and I.5.9 provides the procedures for error protection and handling. Message codings are given in I.6, timer values in I.7 and state transition diagrams in I.8. + +### **I.5.2 Initiating the exchange** + +An IPE TA requires a local memory flag (the re-entry flag) to control the re-entry into IPE from the data transfer state. + +During the inactive state, the TA shall transmit continuous ONES into the B-channel (see I.8). Once a connection has been established, both TAs will initiate the parameter exchange at the selected user rate and set the re-entry flag to ZERO. Before beginning the parameter exchange, both TAs start timer T2 and may send repeated IDLE status octets (see I.6.5). + +In the case where the TAs operate on a different IPE user rate, the following procedure shall be applied: + +- during the first half of period T2, the called TA only tries to adapt to the IPE rate of the calling TA before transmitting its initial exchange of information; +- during the second half of period T2, the calling TA only tries to adapt to the called TA, and retransmits the initial exchange of information at the called TA user rate. + +If timer T2 expires before a complete parameter block has been received, both TAs shall begin data transfer using their default parameters. + +In the case of user rates of 4.8, 9.6 or 19.2 kbit/s, the TA first completes the frame synchronization procedure described in this Recommendation, with the changes detailed below: + +- a) The transmitter sends frames towards its peer with status information S = OFF and X = OFF and enters the awaiting synchronization-parameter exchange state (state 6). +- b) When the TA recognizes the frame synchronization pattern in the awaiting synchronization-parameter exchange state (state 6), it verifies the status information received and then enters the appropriate state, in a coordinated manner, as follows: + - Data transfer (state 4), upon receipt of S = ON and X = ON (see I.5.6); + - IPE default exchange (state 5), upon receipt of S = OFF and X = OFF; + - Parameter exchange (state 7), upon receipt of S = OFF and X = ON (see I.5.3). +- c) When the TA is in the IPE default exchange state (state 5), it shall transmit frames with status information S = OFF and X = ON and verify the status information received and then enter the appropriate state, in a coordinated manner, as follows: + - Data transfer (state 4), upon receipt of S = ON and X = ON (see I.5.6); + - Parameter exchange (state 7), upon receipt of S = OFF and X = ON (see I.5.3). + +In the case of user rates of 56 or 64 kbit/s, there is no frame synchronization requirement. + +### **I.5.3 Parameter exchange** + +#### **I.5.3.1 Octet alignment** + +In the case of user rates of 4.8, 9.6 or 19.2 kbit/s, each octet of the parameter exchange message is carried as a single start-stop character (see I.6.1). In the case of user rates of 56 or 64 kbit/s, network-provided octet alignment shall be used. + +#### **I.5.3.2 Transfer of parameters** + +The correct interpretation of this subclause requires careful adherence to the definitions made in I.2, particularly for the meaning of a "sequence of command octets" (I.2.9) and a "series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs" (I.2.10). Further detailed information is given in I.5.9 and I.6. + +After the connection has been established, the calling TA takes on the role of the originating TA and the called TA the role of the answering TA. + +The originating TA begins by starting timer T1 and transmitting a sequence of XSTART command octets (see I.6.3). After verifying the receipt of the XSTART command octets, the answering TA starts Timer T1 and begins parameter transfer as described below. Once the originating TA has verified the receipt of the RA VERSION command octet (at the start of the parameter transfer) from the answering TA, the originating TA also begins parameter transfer in the same manner. Figure I.2 portrays the normal sequence of events during the parameter exchange. + +![Sequence diagram showing the initial sequence of events during a parameter exchange between a Calling TA (Originating TA) and a Called TA (Answering TA). The diagram illustrates the flow of XSTART, RA VERSION, and PARAM-X messages, including their components like LOW, HIGH, and FILL, and the repetition of these for multiple parameters.](798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the initial sequence of events during a parameter exchange between a **Calling TA (Originating TA)** and a **Called TA (Answering TA)**. + +**Calling TA (Originating TA) Sequence:** + +- XSTART**: Initiates the call. +- RA VERSION (1)**: First RA version message. +- RA VERSION ( $\geq 32$ )**: Subsequent RA version messages, each containing: + - (Pair 1)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 2)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 3)**: LOW, HIGH + - PARAM-X(1)**: First parameter X. +- PARAM-X ( $\geq 32$ )**: Subsequent parameter X messages, each containing: + - (Pair 1)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 2)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 3)**: LOW, HIGH + - FILL**: Fill data. +- FILL**: Final fill data. +- etc.**: Indicates further events. + +**Called TA (Answering TA) Sequence:** + +- IDLE**: Initial state. +- IDLE (X START)**: Response to XSTART. +- RA VERSION (1)**: First RA version message received. +- RA VERSION ( $\geq 32$ )**: Subsequent RA version messages received, each containing: + - (Pair 1)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 2)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 3)**: LOW, HIGH + - PARAM-X(1)**: First parameter X received. +- PARAM-X ( $\geq 32$ )**: Subsequent parameter X messages received, each containing: + - (Pair 1)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 2)**: LOW, HIGH + - (Pair 3)**: LOW, HIGH + - FILL**: Fill data received. +- FILL**: Final fill data received. +- etc.**: Indicates further events. + +**Repetition:** The sequence of RA VERSION and PARAM-X messages is repeated for each parameter, as indicated by the "Repeat for each parameter" label on the right side of the diagram. + +Sequence diagram showing the initial sequence of events during a parameter exchange between a Calling TA (Originating TA) and a Called TA (Answering TA). The diagram illustrates the flow of XSTART, RA VERSION, and PARAM-X messages, including their components like LOW, HIGH, and FILL, and the repetition of these for multiple parameters. + +T1701720-92 + +Figure I.2/V.110 – Initial sequence of events during a parameter exchange + +The parameter transfer commences with the transmission of a sequence of RA VERSION command octets followed by a series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs containing the rate adaption identifier (see I.6.2). Directly following the transmission of the rate adaption identifier, the transfer continues with the parameters themselves in five groups: PARAM-0 to PARAM-4 (see I.6.4), transmitted in ascending order. Each group begins with the transmission of a sequence of the appropriate PARAM command octet followed by a series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs which carry the parameters. At the completion of the parameter information transfer, both TAs send repeated FILL status octets until the next stage of the parameter exchange. Transmission of the complete parameter block shall be made within the period T2. + +After receiving and processing the rate adaption and parameter information, the answering TA determines whether the parameters exchanged in both directions are compatible, or whether it can adapt to the parameters of the originating TA. In either case, the exchange has been successful and the procedures described in I.5.3.3 are followed. If the parameters were not compatible and the answering TA decides to continue, it now takes on the role of the originating TA and recommences the parameter exchange with the transmission of a sequence of XSTART command octets. The parameter transfer procedures therefore continue as described above, but with the roles of originating and answering carried out by the opposing TAs. In the first exchange, the called TA should attempt to adapt to the parameters of the calling TA. When continuing the exchange, the new originating TA should attempt, as far as possible, to move the values of its next transmitted parameters towards the values of those previously received. If either TA determines that there is no point in continuing the parameter exchange, the procedures described in I.5.3.4 are followed. + +Parameter information continues to be exchanged in this manner, with alternate reversal of the roles of originating and answering TA until the outcome is successful, unsuccessful, or timer T1 expires. + +In order that the service offered is not degraded from that provided without IPE, a TA should connect using its default parameters upon expiry of timer T1. This does not prohibit either TA initiating disconnection at any time. + +#### **I.5.3.3 Successful exchange** + +A parameter exchange is considered successful when the last set of TA parameters transferred in both directions are compatible, or when the answering TA can adapt to the parameters of the originating TA. The answering TA shall notify the originating TA of a successful exchange before proceeding; this notification is provided by the transmission of a sequence of READY status octets. Both TAs shall set the re-entry flag to ONE. In any case, both TAs will proceed into the data transfer state (see I.5.5.1) unless re-synchronization to a new intermediate rate is required (see I.5.4). + +#### **I.5.3.4 Unsuccessful exchange** + +If at any time during the exchange either TA concludes that a successful exchange of parameters cannot be achieved or that the rate adaption protocols are not compatible, the TA should clear the connection. + +### **I.5.4 Re-synchronization to a new intermediate rate** + +If the outcome of the IPE is the selection of a user data rate requiring a new intermediate rate, re-synchronization will be necessary, and the TA enters the awaiting re-synchronization state (state 8). Whilst in this state the transmitter of the TA will send frames with S = OFF and X = OFF towards the peer TA in the new intermediate rate channel agreed. The default intermediate-rate channel positions correspond to those recommended for single stream operation in Recommendation I.460. + +At the same time, the receiver of the TA will commence searching for the frame synchronization pattern in the selected sub-rate channel. When the TA recognizes the frame synchronization pattern, it shall verify the status information received and enter the appropriate state, in a coordinated manner, as follows: + +- Data transfer (state 4), upon receipt of S = ON and X = ON (see I.5.6); +- No exchange (state 9), upon receipt of S = OFF and X = OFF. + +When the TA is in the no exchange state (state 9), it shall transmit frames with status information S = ON and X = ON and enter the data transfer state (state 4) upon receipt of S = ON and X = ON. + +### **I.5.5 Data transfer** + +#### **I.5.5.1 Transition into the data transfer state** + +Entry into the data transfer state should be carried out in a coordinated manner, as described by this Recommendation by both TAs after sufficient time has been given to enable the processing of the parameter information. + +#### **I.5.5.2 The data transfer state** + +The procedures on entering the data transfer state (state 4) and the values of S and X status information in the case of data rates less than 56 kbit/s are described in this Recommendation. + +### **I.5.6 Interworking with a TA not supporting IPE** + +A TA may choose to bypass IPE; for example, when it is used in a pre-configured arrangement, or when the parameter exchange can be effected by out-of-band signalling. In this situation a TA supporting IPE may receive S = ON and X = ON verified status information, causing the TA to directly enter the data transfer state. See I.8. + +A TA not supporting IPE can receive frames containing the status information S = OFF and X = ON from its peer. In this situation the non-IPE TA may either continue to transmit the status information S = OFF and X = OFF, or change to the data transfer state and transmit the status information S = ON and X = ON. Both cases will lead to entry into the data transfer state without IPE. See I.8. + +In the case of IPE at 64 kbit/s unrestricted or restricted, or in the case of a TA continuing to transmit the status information S = OFF and X = OFF, timer T2 ensures that service is not degraded from that provided without IPE. See I.8. + +### **I.5.7 Maintenance** + +A TA maintenance (MNT) call is made by indicating in PARAM-0 that the calling TA requires MNT support and by directly following the parameter transfer with a MAINTENANCE message group identifying the function required (see I.6.6). A TA which supports MNT shall indicate in PARAM-0 that MNT support is available. When an MNT function is requested by a calling TA, the called TA capable of supporting MNT shall acknowledge the request by initiating a subsequent parameter exchange including at the end the identical MAINTENANCE message group, before continuing directly to invoke the required MNT function. + +A successful MNT call with no timer required is terminated by either TA clearing the call. A successful MNT call with timer required returns the called TA to the inactive state upon expiry of timer T3, or to the Null state upon disconnection. + +A TA which does not support MNT shall indicate in PARAM-0 of the initial exchange that no MNT support is provided, and should clear the connection after the initial parameter exchange when an MNT call is received. + +### **I.5.8 Re-entering IPE from the data transfer state** + +Test loopbacks in this Recommendation refer to the I.600 series. The major application of this facility is to provide a mechanism to allow a remote loopback to be established for maintenance purposes without disconnecting the equipment in the established path. This mechanism may also be used generally to re-enter IPE. + +This mechanism is not applicable to unrestricted 64-kbit/s or restricted 64-kbit/s connection types, or when the rate during data transfer is 64 kbit/s, 56 kbit/s or 48 kbit/s. + +If re-entry to IPE is required and the re-entry flag has the value ONE, then the initiating TA enters the awaiting re-entry to IPE state (state 10) and transmits S = OFF, X = ON and D = IDLE. Re-entry to IPE in order to set a test loop 4 shall only be initiated by a calling TA. + +Receipt of S = OFF, X = ON and D = IDLE shall cause a TA in state 4 to re-enter the parameter exchange state (state 7) at the IPE user rate defined in I.5.1 which is of the same intermediate rate as that used for data transfer. + +Receipt of S = OFF, X = ON and D = IDLE shall cause the initiating TA to re-enter the parameter exchange state (state 7) at the IPE user rate defined in I.5.1 which is of the same intermediate rate as that used for data transfer. + +### **I.5.9 Error protection and handling** + +Error protection and handling are required to overcome the possibility of data corruption. In addition, error recovery procedures are required, for example in the case of loss of frame synchronization. + +To protect against data corruption, IPE commands shall be sent in a repeated sequence of at least 32 octets. Verification of the correct receipt of a command octet can then be carried out based on persistence checking techniques. Once a verified command octet has been received, it can be identified by the codings given in I.6. Any command octet not recognized shall be ignored. To protect against data corruption, LOW-HIGH data message pairs shall be sent in groups of three pairs. This enables majority voting techniques to be employed by the receiving TA. + +Upon the detection of irrecoverable data corruption during the parameter exchange, loss of frame synchronization or other situations requiring the exchange to be restarted, the TA shall complete the current message flow and initiate error recovery by transmitting a sequence of XSTART command octets and assuming the role of the originating TA. Upon receipt of a sequence of XSTART commands octets, a TA will recommence the parameter exchange as described in I.5.3.2. In this case of a collision of XSTART octets, the original originating and answering roles are assumed by the TAs. + +## **I.6 Coding** + +### **I.6.1 General** + +Information transfer during IPE is based on a group of messages. These messages are used to carry out a variety of tasks. The messages associated with rate adaption identification are described in I.6.2, whilst those associated with the actual parameter transfer are given in I.6.4. The messages associated with the control of the IPE are described in I.6.3, and I.6.5 covers those used to indicate status. Finally, I.6.6 covers the coding of the maintenance message. + +The messages are all based on octets structured as shown in Figure I.4. + +In the case of a user rate of 64 kbit/s, the octets are transmitted to line in bit sequence from bit 1 to bit 8. Network-provided octet alignment shall be used. + +In the case of a user rate of 56 kbit/s, the data is transmitted to line in bit sequence from bit 1 to bit 7 followed by an 8th bit set to ONE – according to this Recommendation, rate adaption (in total this is the equivalent data stream to 64 kbit/s). Network-provided octet alignment shall be used. + +In the case of user rates of 4.8, 9.6 or 19.2 kbit/s, the octets are packaged as single start-stop characters, using the following format: + +- 1 start bit; +- 8 data bits (in order of transmission shown in Figure I.3); +- No parity; and +- 1 stop bit. + +![Diagram of asynchronous character format showing a sequence of bits from b1 to b8 between a Start and Stop bit.](be3e5fe8be7cc5a74f67a4b8ac93193d_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a horizontal line representing a transmission sequence. It starts with a box labeled 'Start', followed by a series of eight boxes labeled 'b1', 'b2', 'b3', 'b4', 'b5', 'b6', 'b7', and 'b8'. The sequence ends with a box labeled 'Stop'. + +Diagram of asynchronous character format showing a sequence of bits from b1 to b8 between a Start and Stop bit. + +**Figure I.3/V.110 – Asynchronous character format** + +![Diagram showing bit rates and bit positions for asynchronous character format.](69e5f1993021af230d08c08aac97d9df_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a horizontal line with two arrows above it. The top arrow is labeled '4.8, 9.6, 19.2' and '64 kbit/s'. The bottom arrow is labeled '56 kbit/s'. Below the arrows is a table with 8 columns labeled '1' through '8'. The word 'Bit' is to the left of the table. + +| | | | | | | | | | +|-----|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| Bit | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +|-----|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| + +Diagram showing bit rates and bit positions for asynchronous character format. + +bit 8: Set to ONE (and ignored on receipt) + +NOTE – Equivalent data stream to that for 64 kbit/s is created with 56 kbit/s when rate adaption according to this Recommendation is used. + +bit 7: Set to ZERO for IPE data + +Set to ONE for IPE signal + +*For IPE data* + +bit 6: Set to ONE + +(Set to ZERO: message reserved for private use and ignored if not implemented) + +bit 5: Set to ZERO when carrying data bits d0-d3 + +Set to ONE when carrying data bits d4-d7 + +bits 1-4: Carrying data bits (d0-d3) or (d4-d7) + +*For IPE signal* + +bit 6: Set to ONE + +(Set to ZERO: message reserved for private use and ignored if not implemented) + +bit 5: Set to ZERO for command messages + +Set to ONE for status messages + +bits 1-4: The signal code + +**Figure I.4/V.110 – Octet structure of the IPE coding** + +Figure I.5 provides a complete set of octet codings for use in IPE. + +| | | Message | ← 4.8, 9.6, 19.2 and 64 kbit/s → | | | | | | | | | +|-------------|---------|-------------|----------------------------------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|--| +| | | | ← 56 kbit/s → | | | | | | | | | +| | | | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | | +| IPE signals | Command | PARAM-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | PARAM-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | PARAM-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | PARAM-3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | PARAM-4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | RA VERSION | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | XSTART | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | MAINTENANCE | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | Status | | | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | | READY | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | IDLE | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | FILL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | INACTIVE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | | | | | | | | | | | | +| IPE data | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | | LOW | d0 | d1 | d2 | d3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | +| | | HIGH | d4 | d5 | d6 | d7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | + +NOTE – All spare codings are reserved (unless indicated for private use). Any octet received and verified which is not recognized shall be ignored. + +**Figure I.5/V.110 – IPE octet codings** + +### I.6.2 Rate adaption version identification + +Transfer of the rate adaption identifier is achieved by a message group based on three octets and transferred according to the procedures described in I.5.3.2 and I.5.9. The message consists of a sequence of RA VERSION command octets followed by a series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs, the LOW data octet being transmitted in the pair before the HIGH data octet. Figure I.6 shows the message codings for rate adaption identification. + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|-------------------------------------------|----|----|----|----|-----|----|----|----| +| RA VERSION | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| LOW | d0 | d1 | d2 | d3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| HIGH | d4 | d5 | d6 | d7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| Rate adaption version identifier encoding | | | | | | | | | +| HIGH | | | | | LOW | | | | +| d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| I3 | I2 | I1 | I0 | | x | x | x | x | +| I3 | I2 | I1 | I0 | | | | | | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | + +I3-I0: Identifier V.110 + +x Reserved (if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) + +NOTE – All other codings are reserved. + +**Figure I.6/V.110 – Rate adaption version Identifier** + +### I.6.3 Control + +Before each transfer of TA parameter information can begin, a sequence of XSTART command octets is transmitted by the originating TA towards the answering TA as described in I.5.3.2 and I.5.9. Figure I.7 shows the coding for the XSTART command octet. + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|--------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| XSTART | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure I.7/V.110 – XSTART coding** + +### I.6.4 Parameters + +Transfer of the TA parameters is achieved in a series of five message groups each based on three octets and transferred according to the procedures described in I.5.3.2 and I.5.9. Each message group consists of a sequence of PARAM-X command octets (PARAM-0 to PARAM-4) followed by a series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs, the LOW data octet being transmitted in the pair before the HIGH data octet. Figure I.8 shows the command octet codings and Figures I.9 to I.13 show the data octet codings for parameter transfer. + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|---------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| PARAM-X | 0 | x2 | x1 | x0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| | | x2 | x1 | x0 | | | | | +| PARAM-0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | | | | +| PARAM-1 | | 0 | 0 | 1 | | | | | +| PARAM-2 | | 0 | 1 | 0 | | | | | +| PARAM-3 | | 0 | 1 | 1 | | | | | +| PARAM-4 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | | | +| LOW | d0 | d1 | d2 | d3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| HIGH | d4 | d5 | d6 | d7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | + +**Figure I.8/V.110 – Format of parameter message group** + +| | | HIGH | | | | LOW | | | | +|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|----|--------|--------|-----|----|----|--------| +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| | | Sp | Sp | Ms | Mr | x | x | x | Ex | +| Sp | (Spare): Set to ZERO on transmission, ignored on reception | | | | | | | | | +| Ms | (Maintenance supported):
Maintenance not supported
Maintenance supported | | | 0
1 | | | | | | +| Mr | (Maintenance required):
Maintenance not required
Maintenance required | | | | 0
1 | | | | | +| Ex | (Extension):
If TA does not require octet alignment according to Rec. X.30
If TA does require octet alignment according to Rec. X.30 | | | | | | | | 0
1 | +| x | Reserved
(if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) | | | | | | | | | + +**Figure I.9/V.110 – Parameter 0 encoding** + +| | | HIGH | | | | LOW | | | | +|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------|----|----|----|-----|----|----|----| +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| P2-P0 | Parity | P2 | P1 | P0 | Mo | x | x | x | Ch | +| | Odd | 0 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | +| | Even | 0 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | +| | None | 0 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | +| | Forced to ZERO | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | +| | Forced to ONE | 1 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | +| Mo (Mode) | Asynchronous | | | | | 0 | | | | +| | Synchronous | | | | | 1 | | | | +| Ch (Check) | DTE Parity check made when required | | | | | | | | 0 | +| | No DTE parity check made when required | | | | | | | | 1 | +| x | Reserved
(if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) | | | | | | | | | + +**Figure I.10/V.110 – Parameter 1 encoding** + +| | | HIGH | | | | LOW | | | | +|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------|----|----|----|-----|----|----|----| +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| S1-S0 | Stop bits | S1 | S0 | C1 | C0 | x | x | x | Cx | +| | Not used | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | +| | 1 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | | +| | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | +| | 2 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | | | +| C1-C0 | Character length | | | C1 | C0 | | | | | +| | Not used | | | 0 | 0 | | | | | +| | 5 | | | 0 | 1 | | | | | +| | 7 | | | 1 | 0 | | | | | +| | 8 | | | 1 | 1 | | | | | +| NOTE – Character length includes parity. | | | | | | | | | | +| Cx | (Character length extension): | | | | | | | | | +| | Standard C1-C0 codings used | | | | | | | | 0 | +| | 9-bits character length used | | | | | | | | 1 | +| x | Reserved
(if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) | | | | | | | | | + +**Figure I.11/V.110 – Parameter 2 coding** + +| | | HIGH | | | | LOW | | | | +|--------|---------------------------------------------------|------|----|----|----|-----|----|----|----| +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| | | Sp | R6 | R5 | R4 | R3 | R2 | R1 | R0 | +| Sp(d7) | Set to ZERO on transmission, ignored on reception | | | | | | | | | +| R6-R0 | Rates | R6 | R5 | R4 | R3 | R2 | R1 | R0 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| | 600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 2400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | +| | 3600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | +| | 4800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | +| | 7200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | 9600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| | 14 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 19 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | +| | 48 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 56 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| | 75 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 110 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | +| | 150 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | +| | 200 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | +| | 300 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 12 000 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | +| | Reserved | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | +| | | | | | to | | | | | +| | Reserved | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | +| | 64 000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | + +**Figure I.12/V.110 – Parameter 3 encoding** + +| | | HIGH | | | | LOW | | | | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|--------|----------|----------|-----|----|----|--------| +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| | | Sp | Fc | TNI
C | RNI
C | x | x | x | Mm | +| NIC | Network Independent Clock (see clause 5) | | | | | | | | | +| Sp | (Spare):
Set to ZERO on transmission, ignored on reception | | | | | | | | | +| Fc | (Flow control):
No end-to-end flow control supported
End-to-end flow control supported | | 0
1 | | | | | | | +| TNIC | If TA need not use NIC
If TA needs to use NIC | | | 0
1 | | | | | | +| RNIC | If TA cannot accept NIC
If TA can accept NIC | | | | 0
1 | | | | | +| Mm | (Modem):
TA not connected to a modem
TA connected to a modem | | | | | | | | 0
1 | +| x | Reserved
(if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) | | | | | | | | | + +**Figure I.13/V.110 – Parameter 4 encoding** + +### I.6.5 Status + +To inform the peer TA that a parameter exchange has been successful, a sequence of READY status octets shall be transmitted towards the peer according to the procedures in I.5. Figure I.14 shows the coding for the READY status octet. + +To inform the peer TA that it is in an idle condition prior to parameter exchange, a sequence of IDLE status octets are transmitted towards the peer according to the procedures in I.5. Figure I.15 shows the message coding for the IDLE status octet. + +The FILL status octet is used as a fill between parameter transfers, according to the procedures in I.5. Figure I.16 shows the coding for the FILL status octet. + +To inform the peer TA that the channel is currently inactive, a sequence of INACTIVE status octets are transmitted towards the peer according to the procedures in I.5. Figure I.17 shows the coding for the INACTIVE status octet. + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|-------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| READY | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure I.14/V.110 – READY octet coding** + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| IDLE | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure I.15/V.110 – IDLE octet coding** + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| FILL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure I.16/V.110 – FILL octet coding** + +| | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +|----------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| INACTIVE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure I.17/V.110 – INACTIVE octet coding** + +### I.6.6 Maintenance + +This message group based on three octets is used to carry information in association with maintenance operations. The message group consists of a sequence of MAINTENANCE command octets followed by a series of LOW-HIGH data octet pairs, the LOW data octet being transmitted in the pair before the HIGH data octet. Figure I.18 shows the message codings. + +| | | | | | | | | | | +|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|----|----|----|-----|----|----|----|----| +| | | b1 | b2 | b3 | b4 | b5 | b6 | b7 | b8 | +| MAINTENANCE | | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| LOW | | d0 | d1 | d2 | d3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| HIGH | | d4 | d5 | d6 | d7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| Maintenance encoding | | | | | | | | | | +| HIGH | | | | | LOW | | | | | +| | | d7 | d6 | d5 | d4 | d3 | d2 | d1 | d0 | +| | | Sp | Rt | L1 | L0 | x | x | x | R1 | +| Sp(d7) | Set to ZERO on transmission, ignored on reception | | | | | | | | | +| Rt | (Request for timer T3 – see I.5.7): | | | | | | | | | +| | No timer required | | 0 | | | | | | | +| | Timer required | | 1 | | | | | | | +| L1-L0 | (Loop required): | | | | L1 | L0 | | | | +| | No loopback | | | | 0 | 0 | | | | +| | Test loop 4 | | | | 0 | 1 | | | | +| | (I.600-series Recommendations) | | | | | | | | | +| | Reserved | | | | 1 | 0 | | | | +| | Reserved | | | | 1 | 1 | | | | +| R1 | (d0 test loop 5): | | | | | | | | R1 | +| | (I.600-series Recommendations) | | | | | | | | 0 | +| | Test loop 5 not required | | | | | | | | 0 | +| | Test loop 5 required | | | | | | | | 1 | +| x | Reserved | | | | | | | | | +| | (if not used, set to ZERO and ignored on receipt) | | | | | | | | | + +NOTE 1 – Test loop 5 is applied as near to the interface at the R reference point as practicable, and is outside the scope of this Recommendation. + +NOTE 2 – Loop definitions 4 and 5 are defined in the I.600-series Recommendations. + +NOTE 3 – Definitions are for the direction calling TA- to -called TA. In the reverse direction, they represent confirmation of the maintenance function. + +**Figure I.18/V.110 – Coding of MAINTENANCE message group** + +## I.7 Timer values + +### I.7.1 Timer values for parameter exchange + +Timer T1 shall be at least 8 s but less than timer T1 in 7.1.2.2. + +Timer T2 shall be 3 s. + +### I.7.2 Timer values for maintenance + +Timer T3 shall be 60 s. + +## **I.8 State transition diagrams** + +### **I.8.1 General** + +In this subclause, state transition diagrams are provided to show the states of a terminal adaptor in the following situations: + +- terminal adaptor not supporting the exchange of parameter information (Figure I.19); +- terminal adaptor interworking with a terminal adaptor not supporting the exchange of parameter information (Figure I.20); +- terminal adaptor capable of supporting the exchange of parameter information (Figure I.21); +- terminal adaptor capable of supporting a maintenance test loop 4 (Figure I.22). + +Following is a summary of the basic states involved: + +| | | +|----------|-----------------------------------------------| +| State 0 | Null | +| State 1 | Inactive | +| State 2 | Awaiting synchronization – Data transfer | +| State 3 | Default exchange | +| State 4 | Data transfer | +| State 5 | IPE default exchange | +| State 6 | Awaiting synchronization – Parameter exchange | +| State 7 | Parameter exchange | +| State 8 | Awaiting re-synchronization | +| State 9 | No exchange | +| State 10 | Awaiting re-entry to IPE | +| State 11 | Maintenance loop 4 loopback | + +![State diagram for TA not supporting IPE. The diagram shows four states: 0. Null, 1. Inactive, 2. Awaiting sync transfer, and 4. Data transfer. Transitions are triggered by events like 'Connect', 'Initiate data transfer', 'Frame sync timer expires', and 'Rx S = ON/X = ON'.](89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg) + +``` + +stateDiagram-v2 + state "0. Null" as Null { + Undefined + } + state "1. Inactive" as Inactive { + ONEs (inactive) + } + state "2. Awaiting sync transfer" as Awaiting { + S = OFF X = OFF + d = ONEs + } + state "3. Default exchange" as Default { + S = ON X = ON + d = ONEs + } + state "4. Data transfer" as Data { + S = ON X = ON + d = DATA + } + + Null --> Inactive : Connect + Inactive --> Awaiting : Initiate data transfer + Awaiting --> Awaiting : Frame sync timer expires + Awaiting --> Default : Rx S = ON, X = ON + Awaiting --> Data : Rx S = OFF, X = OFF + Default --> Data : Rx S = ON, X = ON + Data --> Awaiting : Rx S = ON, X = ON + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the state transitions for a TA not supporting IPE. It consists of four states represented by rounded rectangles with a horizontal line separating the state name from the internal variables. + +- 0. Null**: Internal variable is *Undefined*. A **Connect** event transitions to state 1. +- 1. Inactive**: Internal variable is *ONEs (inactive)*. An **Initiate data transfer** event transitions to state 2. +- 2. Awaiting sync transfer**: Internal variables are *S = OFF*, *X = OFF*, and *d = ONEs*. + - A **Frame sync timer expires** event loops back to this state. + - An **Rx S = ON, X = ON** event transitions to state 3. + - An **Rx S = OFF, X = OFF** event transitions to state 4. +- 3. Default exchange**: Internal variables are *S = ON*, *X = ON*, and *d = ONEs*. An **Rx S = ON, X = ON** event transitions to state 4. +- 4. Data transfer**: Internal variables are *S = ON*, *X = ON*, and *d = DATA*. An **Rx S = ON, X = ON** event loops back to state 2. + +State diagram for TA not supporting IPE. The diagram shows four states: 0. Null, 1. Inactive, 2. Awaiting sync transfer, and 4. Data transfer. Transitions are triggered by events like 'Connect', 'Initiate data transfer', 'Frame sync timer expires', and 'Rx S = ON/X = ON'. + +T1701890-92 + +NOTE – Release sequences not shown. + +**Figure I.19/V.110 – State diagram: TA not supporting IPE** + +![State diagram showing transitions between states 0 to 6 for a TA not supporting IPE. Transitions are triggered by events like 'Connect', 'Initiate data transfer', 'Frame sync timer expires', and signal conditions for Rx S and X.](a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg) + +``` + +stateDiagram-v2 + state "0. Null\nUndefined" as State0 + state "1. Inactive\nONEs (inactive)" as State1 + state "2. Awaiting\nsync transfer\nS = OFF, X = OFF\nd = ONEs" as State2 + state "3. Default\nexchange\nS = ON, X = ON\nd = ONEs" as State3 + state "4. Data transfer\nS = ON, X = ON\nd = DATA" as State4 + state "5. IPE default\nexchange\nS = OFF, X = ON\nd = IDLE" as State5 + state "6. Awaiting\nsync exchange\nS = OFF, X = OFF\nd = IDLE" as State6 + + State0 --> State1 : Connect + State1 --> State2 : Initiate data transfer + State1 --> State6 : Initiate parameter exchange\nSet re-enter flag = 0 + State2 --> State3 : Rx S = ON\nX = ON + State2 --> State0 : Frame sync\ntimer expires + State3 --> State4 : Rx S = ON\nX = ON + State4 --> State2 : Rx S = OFF\nX = ON\n(optional) + State4 --> State0 : Frame sync\ntimer expires + State6 --> State2 : Rx S = OFF\nX = OFF + State6 --> State5 : Rx S = OFF\nX = OFF + State6 --> State4 : Rx S = ON\nX = ON + State6 --> State0 : Frame sync\ntimer expires + State5 --> State4 : T2 or\nRx S = ON\nX = ON + State3 --> State2 : Rx S = OFF\nX = OFF + +``` + +NOTE – Release sequences not shown. + +State diagram showing transitions between states 0 to 6 for a TA not supporting IPE. Transitions are triggered by events like 'Connect', 'Initiate data transfer', 'Frame sync timer expires', and signal conditions for Rx S and X. + +**Figure I.20/V.110 – State diagram: Interworking with a TA not supporting IPE** + +![State diagram for TA supporting IPE showing transitions between states 0 to 10 based on signal conditions and timers.](cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg) + +``` + + graph TD + S0[0. Null] -- Undefined --> S1[1. Inactive] + S1 -- Connect --> S1 + S1 -- Initiate data transfer --> S2[2. Awaiting sync transfer] + S2 -- Frame sync timer expires --> S0 + S2 -- Rx S=ON, X=ON --> S3[3. Default exchange] + S2 -- Rx S=OFF, X=OFF --> S5[5. IPE default exchange] + S3 -- Rx S=OFF, X=ON optional --> S2 + S3 -- Rx S=ON, X=ON --> S4[4. Data transfer] + S1 -- Initiate parameter exchange, Set re-enter flag = 0 --> S6[6. Awaiting sync exchange] + S6 -- Frame sync timer expires --> S0 + S6 -- Rx S=OFF, X=OFF --> S5 + S6 -- Rx S=ON, X=ON --> S7[7. Parameter exchange] + S6 -- Rx S=OFF, X=ON --> S7 + S5 -- Rx S=OFF, X=ON --> S7 + S7 -- Xstart --> S7 + S7 -- T2 or Rx S=ON, X=ON --> S4 + S7 -- New intermediate rate --> S8[8. Await resync] + S8 -- Frame sync timer expires --> S0 + S8 -- Rx S=OFF, X=OFF --> S9[9. No exchange] + S9 -- Rx S=ON, X=ON, Set re-enter flag = 1 --> S4 + S4 -- 58K/64K or no change, Set re-enter flag = 1 --> S4 + S4 -- Rx S=ON, X=ON, Set re-enter flag = 1 --> S4 + S4 -- T1 --> S7 + S4 -- If re-entry flag = 1 and re-entry required --> S10[10. Await re-enter IPE] + S10 -- Rx S=OFF, X=ON, d=IDLE --> S7 + +``` + +Detailed description of states: +**0. Null**: Undefined state. +**1. Inactive**: ONEs (inactive). +**2. Awaiting sync transfer**: S = OFF, X = OFF, d = ONEs. +**3. Default exchange**: S = ON, X = ON, d = ONEs. +**4. Data transfer**: S = ON, X = ON, d = DATA. +**5. IPE default exchange**: S = OFF, X = ON, d = IDLE. +**6. Awaiting sync exchange**: S = OFF, X = OFF, d = IDLE. +**7. Parameter exchange**: S = OFF, X = ON (IPE message). +**8. Await resync**: S = OFF, X = OFF, d = ONEs. +**9. No exchange**: S = ON, X = ON, d = ONEs. +**10. Await re-enter IPE**: S = OFF, X = ON, d = IDLE. + +State diagram for TA supporting IPE showing transitions between states 0 to 10 based on signal conditions and timers. + +NOTE – Release sequences not shown. + +**Figure I.21/V.110 – State diagram: TA supporting IPE** + +**Recommendation V.110 (02/2000)**      49 + +![State diagram for Maintenance loop 4 showing transitions between 12 states based on signal conditions and timers.](c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg) + +``` + +stateDiagram-v2 + [*] --> 0 + 0: 0. Null\nUndefined + 1: 1. Inactive\nONEs (inactive) + 2: 2. Awaiting sync transfer\nS = OFF, X = OFF\nd = ONEs + 3: 3. Default exchange\nS = ON, X = ON\nd = ONEs + 4: 4. Data transfer\nS = ON, X = ON\nd = DATA + 5: 5. IPE default exchange\nS = OFF, X = ON\nd = IDLE + 6: 6. Awaiting sync exchange\nS = OFF, X = OFF\nd = IDLE + 7: 7. Parameter exchange\nS = OFF, X = ON\n(IPE message) + 8: 8. Await resync\nS = OFF, X = OFF\nd = ONEs + 9: 9. No exchange\nS = ON, X = ON\nd = ONEs + 10: 10. Await re-enter IPE\nS = OFF, X = ON\nd = IDLE + 11: 11. Maintenance loop 4\nUndefined + + 0 --> 1: Connect + 1 --> 0: Disconnect + 1 --> 2: Initiate data transfer + 2 --> 0: Frame sync timer expires + 2 --> 3: Rx S = ON, X = ON + 2 --> 4: Rx S = OFF, X = OFF + 3 --> 4: Rx S = ON, X = ON + 4 --> 2: Rx S = OFF, X = ON (optional) + 1 --> 6: Initiate parameter exchange\nSet re-enter flag = 0 + 6 --> 0: Frame sync timer expires + 6 --> 5: Rx S = OFF, X = OFF + 6 --> 7: Rx S = OFF, X = ON + 6 --> 11: Rx S = ON, X = ON + 5 --> 7: Rx S = OFF, X = ON + 7 --> 7: Xstart + 7 --> 4: 58K/64K or no change.\nSet re-enter flag = 1 + 7 --> 8: New intermediate rate + 8 --> 0: Frame sync timer expires + 8 --> 9: Rx S = OFF, X = OFF + 8 --> 4: Rx S = ON, X = ON\nSet re-enter flag = 1 + 9 --> 4: Rx S = ON, X = ON\nSet re-enter flag = 1 + 4 --> 10: If re-entry flag = 1 and re-entry required + 10 --> 7: Rx S = OFF, X = ON\nd = IDLE + 10 --> 4: Rx S = OFF, X = ON\nd = IDLE + 11 --> 1: T3 + 11 --> 7: Loop 4 request + 7 --> 11: T1 + 4 --> 7: T2 or Rx S = ON, X = ON + +``` + +State diagram for Maintenance loop 4 showing transitions between 12 states based on signal conditions and timers. + +T1701920-92 + +**Figure I.22/V.110 – State diagram: Maintenance loop 4** + +50 + +**Recommendation V.110 (02/2000)** + +# APPENDIX II + +## V.25 bis to Q.931 protocol mapping + +## II.1 General + +The D-channel signalling capabilities of the ISDN customer-access are as defined in Recommendation Q.931. The mapping of the V.25 *bis* interface signalling procedures to the Q.931 protocol at the S/T reference point are described below. + +The logical representation of this mapping function is shown in Figure II.1. + +![Figure II.1/V.110 – Terminal adapter V.25 bis mapping. The diagram shows a box labeled 'Terminal adaptor (TA)' containing two columns: 'V.25 bis DCE functions' on the left and 'S-interface signalling functions' on the right. Two horizontal arrows labeled 'Mapping' connect the columns, one pointing right at the top and one pointing left at the bottom. To the left of the box is a vertical line with 'R' above it and '===|=== ' below it. To the right is a vertical line with 'S, T' above it and '===|===== ' below it. Below the box is the text 'Logical interface'. In the bottom right corner is the text 'T1701370-91'.](28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg) + +Terminal adaptor (TA) + +Mapping + +V.25 *bis* DCE functions      S-interface signalling functions + +Mapping + +Logical interface + +T1701370-91 + +Figure II.1/V.110 – Terminal adapter V.25 bis mapping. The diagram shows a box labeled 'Terminal adaptor (TA)' containing two columns: 'V.25 bis DCE functions' on the left and 'S-interface signalling functions' on the right. Two horizontal arrows labeled 'Mapping' connect the columns, one pointing right at the top and one pointing left at the bottom. To the left of the box is a vertical line with 'R' above it and '===|=== ' below it. To the right is a vertical line with 'S, T' above it and '===|===== ' below it. Below the box is the text 'Logical interface'. In the bottom right corner is the text 'T1701370-91'. + +**Figure II.1/V.110 – Terminal adapter V.25 *bis* mapping** + +The D-channel signalling capabilities provided to V.25 *bis* based terminals shall comprise the signalling messages as defined in Recommendation Q.931. + +The following description and figures depict examples of V.25 *bis* mapping to the ISDN call control procedures. It is recognized that other possibilities and user options exist. But this subclause is intended to provide general guidelines for a satisfactory means of V.25 *bis* support. Only the normal call establishment and clearing procedures are shown. The following subclauses are titled with the terms of signalling messages at the S-interface. + +*Recall of the circuit list involved in the V.25 bis call set-up* + +- Ready for sending (106). +- Data set ready (107). +- Data terminal ready (108/2). +- Transmit data (103). +- Receive data (104). +- Calling indicator (125). + +This appendix deals with call establishment and clearing. Any specific use of V.24 interchange circuits herein described only applies during these phases. The management of interchange circuits during the data transmission phase is not part of this appendix. + +The state of other interchange circuits is not part of this appendix. However, to ensure maximum compatibility with existing equipment, the other interchange circuits provided should retain their normal function as defined in Recommendation V.24 during the automatic call procedure. + +Particularly to ensure correct operation of the DTE, the condition of circuit 109 should follow the condition of circuit 106. + +The DTE may choose to hold circuit 105 ON during the automatic calling procedure, but the TA is not required to recognize this condition. + +## **II.2 Call origination** + +### **II.2.1 Call set-up** + +#### **II.2.1.1 From TA** + +In the DTE ready state (see Recommendation V.25 *bis*), the present circuit 108/2 ON and 103 = '1'. The TA presents 106 = OFF, 107 = OFF, 125 = OFF and 104 = '1' (state 2 of the V.25 *bis* state diagram). + +In response to detecting circuit 108/2 ON, the TA presents 106 ON which is equivalent to a Proceed to Select indication (X-Series Recommendations), and the DTE enters the DTE-DCE dialogue by presenting Call Request Command call request with identification (CRI) or call request with number (CRN). In response to 108/2 ON, the TA will have initiated the interface at the S/T reference point layer 1 activation as in Recommendation I.430. + +The layer 2 at the interface at the S/T reference point shall be established on request of layer 3 when the set-up message is to be sent, according to Recommendation Q.931. + +When the end of the valid command is received at the R-interface, the TA transmits a set-up message via the D-channel requesting the unrestricted 64-kbit/s bearer capability, for a transfer in circuit mode. + +The user may also specify the layer 1 terminal adaption in the low layer compatibility information element of the call SETUP message. (See Annex L/Q.931 entitled *Low layer information coding principles*.) + +The called party address information element shall be encoded *en bloc* with the complete address of the called party as received from the V.25 *bis* interface. + +#### **II.2.1.2 SETUP acknowledge/call proceeding (from exchange)** + +The network reaction on the SETUP message received from the TA can be either: + +- Sending of a CALL PROCEEDING +When the call proceeding message is received on the D-channel of the interface at the S/T reference point, the B-channel will be allocated and the TA connects to the B-channel. +- Sending a SETUP Acknowledge +When the SETUP Acknowledge message to the TA is received on the D-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point, the B-channel will be allocated to the TA. + +#### **II.2.1.3 CONNECT (from exchange)** + +When a CONNECT is received on the D-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point, the TA transmits any DCE response to the calling DTE and enters state 5 Answer Tone Detected by turning 106 OFF. + +The TA proceeds to the Connect to Line state as described in 7.1.2 completing the V.25 *bis* control phase with circuit 107 ON. + +### **II.2.2 Call received from remote DTE/TA** + +#### **II.2.2.1 Call SETUP (from exchange)** + +The TA should accept a SETUP message regardless of the V.25 *bis* interface state 1 or state 2. When a SETUP message is received on the D-channel at the S interface, the TA shall follow the procedures for determining compatibility checking (data signalling rate) found in Recommendation Q.931. If the TA determines that it can respond to the incoming call, it follows the procedures of Recommendation Q.931. + +The TA indicates an incoming call via the V.25 *bis* interface by setting 125 = ON, 104 = '1' and 107 = OFF; thereby entering state 8 Incoming Call. + +If the DTE does not present 108/2 = ON within a timer time T', the TA rejects the call with a CALL REJECT indicating no answer from DTE. + +#### **II.2.2.2 CONNECT (from TA)** + +When state 9 Incoming Call Recognized is presented by the DTE turning circuit 108/2 ON (note that this may be immediate if the DTE presents 108/2 permanent ON) to accept the incoming call, the TA transmits a CONNECT message via the D-channel of the interface at the S/T reference point. + +#### **II.2.2.3 CONNECT Acknowledge (from exchange)** + +When a CONNECT Acknowledge message is received on the D-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point, the TA, selected by this message, signals Line Seized (state 13) by presenting circuit 125 = OFF to the DTE after presenting positive responses if any. + +The TA proceeds to the Connect to Line state as described in 7.1.2 completing the V.25 *bis* call control phase with circuit 107 = ON. + +## **II.3 Call clearing (Figures II.2 and II.3)** + +### **II.3.1 DISCONNECT (from TA)** + +A clearing by the DTE (state 7) 103 = '1' 108/2 = OFF is transmitted by the TA via the B-channel to the remote DTE. + +The TA at the clearing DTE on recognizing state 7 at the V.25 *bis* interface, disconnects the circuits 103, 104 and 108/2 from the B-channel. The TA causes the status and data bits on the B-channel to correspond to circuit 108/2 OFF and 103 = '1' and awaits for Clearing Acknowledge from remote DTE (108/2 = OFF, 103 = '1') for a timer time of 10 s. The TA then transmits DCE Clear Confirmation by turning OFF 107 to the clearing DTE (no corresponding state of the V.25 *bis* interface). It also transmits a DISCONNECT message via the D-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point. + +After reception of the RELEASE message on the D-channel, the TA sends RELEASE COMPLETE to the exchange, and the DTE enters DTE Ready or DTE Not Ready states. + +### **II.3.2 DISCONNECT (from exchange)** + +In the case of the clearing by the network, the local exchange transmits the DISCONNECT message via the D-channel to the TA to be cleared. After reception of the DISCONNECT message in the TA, the TA transmits a RELEASE message on the D-channel to the exchange. + +If the V.25 *bis* interface is in the call establishment phase and has not yet reached state 5, 6 or 12, and if the DISCONNECT contains the reason for clearing, the TA moves to DTE-DCE dialogue state 3 and transmits the corresponding Call Failure Indication to the DTE prior to Call Clearing. + +Otherwise the TA transmits the DCE clear indication (107 = OFF, 103 = '1'), via the V.25 *bis* interface to the DTE, which sends back to the TA the DTE Clear Confirmation which is identical to Clearing by DTE 108/2 = OFF, 104 = '1' as described in 4.3.3/V.24, (no V.25 *bis* interface states). If the DTE does not present 108/2 = OFF within a timer "T", the TA sends DISCONNECT to the D-channel at the expiration of the timer. + +![Sequence diagram for DTE call establishment and clearing. The diagram shows the interaction between DTE and TA. DTE sends 'DTE ready' to TA. TA sends 'Call request' to DTE. DTE sends 'DTE-DCE dialogue' to TA. TA sends 'Call establishment' to DTE. DTE sends 'Answer tone detected' to TA. TA sends 'Call connected' to DTE. DTE sends 'Call failure indication' to TA. TA sends 'Ready for data alineation' to DTE. DTE sends 'Data transfer' to TA. TA sends 'Clearing by DTE' to DTE. DTE sends 'DCE clear confirmation' to TA. TA sends 'DCE ready' to DTE. DTE sends 'DTE ready or DTE not ready' to TA. TA sends 'RELEASE COMPLETE' to DTE. The diagram also shows 'SETUP' from TA to (D), 'CALL PROCEEDING' from (D) to TA, 'CONNECT' from TA to (D), 'End-to-end synchronization' from (D) to TA, 'DTR = OFF, TD = 1' from TA to (D), 'Clear acknowledge' from (D) to TA, 'DISCONNECT' from TA to (D), and 'RELEASE' from (D) to TA.](7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for DTE call establishment and clearing. The diagram shows the interaction between DTE and TA. DTE sends 'DTE ready' to TA. TA sends 'Call request' to DTE. DTE sends 'DTE-DCE dialogue' to TA. TA sends 'Call establishment' to DTE. DTE sends 'Answer tone detected' to TA. TA sends 'Call connected' to DTE. DTE sends 'Call failure indication' to TA. TA sends 'Ready for data alineation' to DTE. DTE sends 'Data transfer' to TA. TA sends 'Clearing by DTE' to DTE. DTE sends 'DCE clear confirmation' to TA. TA sends 'DCE ready' to DTE. DTE sends 'DTE ready or DTE not ready' to TA. TA sends 'RELEASE COMPLETE' to DTE. The diagram also shows 'SETUP' from TA to (D), 'CALL PROCEEDING' from (D) to TA, 'CONNECT' from TA to (D), 'End-to-end synchronization' from (D) to TA, 'DTR = OFF, TD = 1' from TA to (D), 'Clear acknowledge' from (D) to TA, 'DISCONNECT' from TA to (D), and 'RELEASE' from (D) to TA. + +T1701380-91 + +DTR Data Terminal Ready +TD Transmitted Data + +**Figure II.2/V.110 – Recommendation V.25 *bis* – Example of DTE call establishment and call clearing** + +![Sequence diagram for DCT call establishment and clearing. The diagram shows the interaction between TA and DTE. TA sends 'DTE ready/Not ready' to DTE. DTE sends 'Incoming call' to TA. TA sends 'Incoming call recognized' to DTE. DTE sends 'Incoming call accepted' to TA. TA sends 'Line seized' to DTE. DTE sends 'Ready for data' to TA. TA sends 'Data transfer' to DTE. DTE sends 'Clearing by remote DTE' to TA. TA sends 'Clearing by DTE' to DTE. DTE sends 'DCE ready' to TA. TA sends 'DTE ready/Not ready' to DTE. The diagram also shows 'SETUP' from (D) to TA, 'CONNECT' from TA to (D), 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE' from (D) to TA, 'End-to-end synchronization' from (B) to TA, 'DTR = OFF, RD = 1' from TA to (B), 'DISCONNECT' from TA to (D), 'RELEASE' from (D) to TA, and 'RELEASE COMPLETE' from TA to (D).](212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for DCT call establishment and clearing. The diagram shows the interaction between TA and DTE. TA sends 'DTE ready/Not ready' to DTE. DTE sends 'Incoming call' to TA. TA sends 'Incoming call recognized' to DTE. DTE sends 'Incoming call accepted' to TA. TA sends 'Line seized' to DTE. DTE sends 'Ready for data' to TA. TA sends 'Data transfer' to DTE. DTE sends 'Clearing by remote DTE' to TA. TA sends 'Clearing by DTE' to DTE. DTE sends 'DCE ready' to TA. TA sends 'DTE ready/Not ready' to DTE. The diagram also shows 'SETUP' from (D) to TA, 'CONNECT' from TA to (D), 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE' from (D) to TA, 'End-to-end synchronization' from (B) to TA, 'DTR = OFF, RD = 1' from TA to (B), 'DISCONNECT' from TA to (D), 'RELEASE' from (D) to TA, and 'RELEASE COMPLETE' from TA to (D). + +T1701390-91 + +RD Received Data + +**Figure II.3/V.110 – Recommendation V.25 *bis* – Example of DCT call establishment and call clearing** + +### II.3.3 DISCONNECT (In-band between TAs) + +When the DTE initiates the Clearing by DTE, this status is transmitted in slot within the B-channel and received as DCE clear indication equivalent to a PSTN disconnect in the DTE 107 = OFF. + +The TA recognizes the clear request received in-band via the B-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point, separates the 103 108/2 leads from the B-channel and transmits to the DTE the DCE Clear Indication, 104 = OFF, 107 = OFF. + +After the DTE to be cleared has received DTE Clear Confirmation, (108/2 = OFF, 104 = '1') from the clearing DTE, it transmits a DISCONNECT message via the D-channel, and clears the B-channel. + +After reception of a release message on the D-channel, the TA releases the call reference, sends a RELEASE COMPLETE message to the exchange, and the V.25 *bis* interface enters the state DTE Not Ready or DTE Ready depending on the state of 108/2. + +### II.3.4 RELEASE COMPLETE + +When the RELEASE COMPLETE is received via the D-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point of the TA of the cleared DTE, the V.25 *bis* interface enters DTE Ready or DTE Not Ready depending on the state of circuit 108/2. + +### II.3.5 Negative response to an incoming call + +RELEASE COMPLETE message, including the appropriate case code, is sent by a TA supporting a terminal which is compatible with information contained in the SETUP message, to indicate that the call cannot be accepted at this time for the following reason: busy condition of the called terminal (see Figure II.4). + +![Sequence diagram showing the negative response to an incoming call between DTE A, TA, ET a, ET b, and DTE B.](ae0dd5533e0b7fd2db452b5e2fdf8e5b_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the sequence of events for a negative response to an incoming call. It features six vertical lifelines: DTE A, TA, ET a, ET b, TA, and DTE B. The process is divided into two main phases: 'Call set-up' and 'Call clearing'. + +- Call set-up:** DTE A sends a 'Call request' to the first TA. The first TA sends 'Set-up Call proceeding' to ET a. ET a sends a dashed 'SETUP' message to ET b. ET b sends a dashed 'Release complete (cause)' message to the second TA. +- Call clearing:** The second TA sends 'DISCONNECT (cause)' to ET a. ET a sends 'RELEASE RELEASE COMPLETE' to the first TA. The first TA sends a 'Call failure indication' to DTE A. + +Sequence diagram showing the negative response to an incoming call between DTE A, TA, ET a, ET b, and DTE B. + +T1701400-91 + +**Figure II.4/V.110 – Negative response to an incoming call** + +## II.4 Direct call + +### II.4.1 Direct call DTE call set-up and clearing + +The process is best described in Figure II.5. + +![Sequence diagram for Direct DTE call establishment and clearing (Figure II.5/V.110).](575d7d345b3ec04393bb2ec720ebabca_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant DTE + participant TA + participant D as (D) + participant B as (B) + + DTE->>TA: Ready (108/1 = OFF) + DTE->>TA: Call request (108/1 = ON) + TA->>D: SETUP + D->>TA: CALL PROCEED + TA->>D: CONNECT + TA->>B: End-to-end synchronization + B->>DTE: Ready for data (107 = ON) + DTE->>TA: Data transfer + DTE->>TA: Clearing by DTE (108/1 = OFF) + TA->>B: DTR = OFF, TD = 1 + B->>D: DISCONNECT + D->>TA: RELEASE + TA->>B: RELEASE COMPLETE + B->>DTE: DCE ready (107 = OFF) + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the sequence of events for a direct DTE call. It involves three main entities: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment), TA (Terminal Adapter), and two external components labeled (D) and (B). The process begins with DTE sending a 'Ready (108/1 = OFF)' signal to TA, followed by a 'Call request (108/1 = ON)'. TA then sends 'SETUP' to (D), which responds with 'CALL PROCEED'. TA sends 'CONNECT' to (D). TA then sends 'End-to-end synchronization' to (B), which responds with 'Ready for data (107 = ON)' to DTE. DTE sends 'Data transfer' to TA. DTE then sends 'Clearing by DTE (108/1 = OFF)' to TA. TA sends 'DTR = OFF, TD = 1' to (B), which responds with 'DISCONNECT' to (D). (D) sends 'RELEASE' to TA, which then sends 'RELEASE COMPLETE' to (B). Finally, (B) sends 'DCE ready (107 = OFF)' to DTE. + +Sequence diagram for Direct DTE call establishment and clearing (Figure II.5/V.110). + +T1701410-91 + +**Figure II.5/V.110 – Recommendation V.25 bis – Direct DTE call establishment and call clearing** + +### II.4.2 Direct call DCE call set-up and clearing + +The process is best described in Figure II.6. + +![Sequence diagram for Direct DCE call establishment and clearing (Figure II.6/V.110).](a057800564be3506d2d87b6a4daee25b_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant TA + participant DTE + participant D as (D) + participant B as (B) + + D->>TA: SETUP + TA->>DTE: Incoming call (107 = OFF, 125 = ON) + DTE->>TA: Incoming call accepted (108/1 = ON) + TA->>D: CONNECT + D->>TA: CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE + TA->>B: End-to-end synchronization + B->>DTE: Ready for data (107 = ON, 125 = OFF) + DTE->>TA: Data transfer + TA->>B: Clearing by DCE + B->>D: DTR = OFF, RD = 1 + D->>TA: DISCONNECT + TA->>D: RELEASE + D->>TA: RELEASE COMPLETE + TA->>DTE: DTE clear confirmation + DTE->>TA: DTE ready (108/1 = OFF) + +``` + +The diagram illustrates the sequence of events for a direct DCE call. It involves three main entities: TA (Terminal Adapter), DTE (Data Terminal Equipment), and two external components labeled (D) and (B). The process begins with (D) sending 'SETUP' to TA. TA sends 'Incoming call (107 = OFF, 125 = ON)' to DTE, which responds with 'Incoming call accepted (108/1 = ON)'. TA sends 'CONNECT' to (D), which responds with 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE'. TA sends 'End-to-end synchronization' to (B), which responds with 'Ready for data (107 = ON, 125 = OFF)' to DTE. DTE sends 'Data transfer' to TA. TA sends 'Clearing by DCE' to (B). (B) sends 'DTR = OFF, RD = 1' to (D). (D) sends 'DISCONNECT' to TA, which then sends 'RELEASE' to (D). (D) sends 'RELEASE COMPLETE' to TA. TA sends 'DTE clear confirmation' to DTE, which then sends 'DTE ready (108/1 = OFF)' to TA. + +Sequence diagram for Direct DCE call establishment and clearing (Figure II.6/V.110). + +T1701420-91 + +**Figure II.6/V.110 – Recommendation V.25 bis – Direct DCE call establishment and call clearing** + +## II.5 Mapping of Q.931 causes to V.25 *bis* call failure indications and responses + +In several cases, it will be necessary to map causes from Recommendations Q.931 to V.25 *bis* indications. The TA shall use Table II.1 to map the causes from Q.931 messages to V.25 *bis* Call Failure Indication or Call Progress Signals. The cause codes are provided by the ISDN to the TA. + +Handling of the Call Failure Indication (CFI) by the DTE may be a national matter. CFI (AB) is to be taken by the DTE as no use for the DTE to call again, some changes need to be done within the DTE before the call can be successful; CFI (ET) is to be taken by the DTE as a transient condition, the DTE may retry the call without changes; CFI (NT) indicates a serious failure of the call and the DTE should wait before retrying the call. CFI (INV) is reserved for local invalid commands and is not a mapping of an ISDN cause code. + +Not all Q.931 causes will be reported to the R interface. The general principles kept in Table II.1 are to distinguish between normal events (in a call) causes 0 to 31, resource unavailable causes 32 to 47, service not available causes 48 to 63, service not implemented causes 64 to 79, invalid message causes 80 to 95, protocol error causes 96 to 111, interworking causes 112 to 127. + +**Table II.1/V.110** + +| Item | Q.931 cause | ISDN code | V.25 bis call response | V.25 bis code | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------|----------------------| +| 1 | Unassigned or unallocated number | 1 | Not obtainable | AB | +| 2 | No route to specified transit network | 2 | Not obtainable | NT | +| 3 | No route to destination | 3 | Not obtainable | AB | +| 4 | Channel unacceptable | 6 | Not obtainable | ET | +| 5 | Call awarded and being delivered in an established channel | 7 | | AB | +| 6 | Normal call clearing | 16 | Not applicable | None | +| 7 | User busy | 17 | Number busy | ET | +| 8 | No user responding | 18 | No connection | NT | +| 9 | No answer from user (user alerted) | 19 | No connection | NT | +| 10 | Call rejected | 21 | No connection | NT | +| 11 | Number changed | 22 | Changed number | AB | +| 12 | Non-selected user clearing | 26 | No connection | AB | +| 13 | Destination out of order | 27 | No connection | NT | +| 14 | Invalid number format (address incomplete) | 28 | Selection signals error | AB | +| 15 | Facility rejected | 29 | | AB | +| 16 | Respond to status ENQUIRY | 30 | | AB | +| 17 | Normal, unspecified | 31 | | AB | +| 18 | No circuit/channel available | 34 | No connection | ET | +| 19 | Network out of order | 38 | No connection | NT | +| 20 | Temporary failure | 41 | Out of order | NT | +| 21 | Switching equipment congestion | 42 | Network congestion | NT | +| 22 | Access information discarded | 43 | No connection | NT | + +**Table II.1/V.110 (continued)** + +| Item | Q.931 cause | ISDN code | V.25 bis call response | V.25 bis code | +|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------| +| 23 | Requested circuit/channel not available | 44 | No connection | ET | +| 24 | Resource unavailable, unspecified | 47 | Network congestion | NT | +| 25 | Quality of service unavailable | 49 | | AB | +| 26 | Requested facility not subscribed | 50 | | AB | +| 27 | Bearer capability not authorized | 57 | Incompatible user class | AB | +| 28 | Bearer capability not presently available | 58 | Network congestion | ET | +| 29 | Service or option not available, unspecified | 63 | No connection | AB | +| 30 | Bearer capability not implemented | 65 | Invalid facility request | AB | +| 31 | Channel type not implemented | 66 | Invalid facility request | AB | +| 32 | Requested facility not implemented | 69 | Invalid facility request | AB | +| 33 | Only restricted digital information bearer capability is available | 70 | Invalid facility request | AB | +| 34 | Service or option not implemented, unspecified | 79 | Invalid facility request | AB | +| 35 | Invalid call reference value | 81 | | NT | +| 36 | Identified channel does not exist | 82 | No report | | +| 37 | A suspended call exists, but this call identity does not | 83 | No report | | +| 38 | Call identity in use | 84 | No report | | +| 39 | No call suspended | 85 | No report | | +| 40 | Call having the requested call identity has been cleared | 86 | No report | | +| 41 | Incompatible destination | 88 | | AB | +| 42 | Invalid transit network selection | 91 | No report | | +| 43 | Invalid message, unspecified | 95 | No report | | +| 44 | Mandatory information element is missing | 96 | No report | | +| 45 | Message type non-existent or not implemented | 97 | Protocol error, no report | | +| 46 | Message not compatible with call state or message type non-existent or not implemented | 98 | Protocol error, no report | | +| 47 | Information element/parameter non-existent or not implemented | 99 | Protocol error, no report | | +| 48 | Invalid information element contents | 100 | Protocol error, no report | | + +**Table II.1/V.110 (concluded)** + +| Item | Q.931 cause | ISDN code | V.25 bis call response | V.25 bis code | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------|---------------| +| 49 | Message not compatible with call state | 101 | Protocol error, no report | | +| 50 | Recuperation on timer expiry | 102 | No report | | +| 51 | Protocol error, unspecified | 111 | Protocol error, no report | | +| 52 | Interworking, unspecified | 127 | Not applicable | | +| NOTE – New call failure indication to report ISDN related situations at the V.25 bis interface is for further study. | | | | | + +## **II.6 Additional information for handling of exception situations** + +When the call is cleared prematurely or a call failure occurs, the rules of Recommendations Q.931 and of V.25 bis apply. The following procedures are derived for the mutual mapping between the R and the S reference points. + +### **II.6.1 Call collision** + +Incoming call from the exchange has priority on outgoing call to the exchange (for V.25 bis DTE which is normally attached to PSTN). + +#### **II.6.1.1 Call collision at the V.25 bis interface** + +The TA shall accept an incoming SETUP message. When at the V.25 bis interface a call collision is detected (TA presents incoming call indication, V.25 bis DTE presents call request), the TA will delay the outgoing call to monitor for incoming calls and will accept the incoming call and not process the outgoing call. + +#### **II.6.1.2 Call collision at the interface at the S/T reference point** + +The procedures defined in Recommendation Q.931 will apply. + +### **II.6.2 No channel available** + +If no channel including no B-channel at the interface at the S/T reference point is available for connection establishment, an outgoing SETUP message is answered from the exchange by a RELEASE COMPLETE message with the cause 34 = no channel available. This is mapped at the V.25 bis interface in the call failure indication ET (Engaged Tone). + +### **II.6.3 Premature call clearing** + +##### **II.6.3.1 No answer to outgoing SETUP** + +If an outgoing SETUP is not answered by the exchange, the DTE will after a time out which is fixed by the national Administrations' T2 timer, initiate the clearing by DTE by dropping 108/2 = OFF. The TA on its S reference point, will send a RELEASE COMPLETE message (cause code 31: normal, unspecified). The V.25 bis interface will go back to DTE Ready or DTE Not Ready. + +On the other hand, if a TA is provided with the optional timer T303 (see Recommendation Q.931) it may start the clearing procedure at the interface at the S/T reference point interface as above by transmitting RELEASE COMPLETE (cause code 102: recovery on timer expiry). At the V.25 bis interface, the TA sends the call failure indication No Tone. + + + + + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | + +\*18325\* + +Printed in Switzerland +Geneva, 2000 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58cee29e9cddfd813e6419b5e1709dde51787b2c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:009a8b15a03568f8dbb517a67dadbdec7995b7a82349eaece83b6b391cc9c3bc +size 26026 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6e6873798035bee73a7300471efb45df95375a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:99a99341ed1bf0b56e4cd4cf503a2cbd3fc5447dff662116083e4bd14fe2ff9a +size 8362 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..decdeee261441b053c4075efb9b61aa3b81a7615 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1b0f0afb0b760bb00c0124e1188ea17cf1a1459aa1824bd823bc4990f920f20d +size 40785 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/352c5fab6f936356e9570761a02ab71e_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/352c5fab6f936356e9570761a02ab71e_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e136ffa1bace7545abab6baa33b8995ba5c23f65 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/352c5fab6f936356e9570761a02ab71e_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:59cdf964a98c908c7e09dab416c8719ec321704d80306dad94a0d27b5d6c4a7d +size 37081 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2630c9f65ffbde059e1c58268a8c3ec72b4e01cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8e6a39739682cd2aed03d3072e1d64321468f42bde390d3a58fade14a51a375a +size 26029 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd4d0c7f1eb3b74db5564fdbb5e14068bc0d1681 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d312f25edfea8ccd1e5e92ca974348986193590c482263c5caffdece5b14180b +size 14042 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5a9282ac54ca7bc50f1d2ab6cfb376ba_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5a9282ac54ca7bc50f1d2ab6cfb376ba_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..938af7fbe2571eddbcc032aea3890661aea2eb70 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5a9282ac54ca7bc50f1d2ab6cfb376ba_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b875158f893c1b5c752b9563360b7214209c76cb6145bf7641d60ac87638d96b +size 10773 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2deba18174ae88c434a2f98a8f8d4dd9d57ef0d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e1dc921522ea058b6de7730a3c28e3bb1625f067bfaac1c1d6b3048d9124b28f +size 19866 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6b32b7b928d34eeccb15c29cdf9d2cb3_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6b32b7b928d34eeccb15c29cdf9d2cb3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9ea029fce398148de9290d068bc33eb2b77f63b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6b32b7b928d34eeccb15c29cdf9d2cb3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:07e5eb4692c80f1d374032e9124944728029098d9068d1cc806f5f441d9de20a +size 51528 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6df5629bc2fc6d82f1a1edf9d7340113_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6df5629bc2fc6d82f1a1edf9d7340113_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a588625042d9ea1fd934336dede24ba26e40b0f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/6df5629bc2fc6d82f1a1edf9d7340113_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:108e2199eb1a3cae20a959f651cba0e9a05ab60a62063116068ae8d996945b70 +size 46612 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0dd0ea4496b8e3b4c650a207f5d83e6ffe5d3469 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ab41d44501b22314f9ccdb51e8f2fae1d167987078556688950e6a669102cf81 +size 14011 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e91a33b58f3b27d0d3063e398f0ab9c51355aacd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:68c99f0596ef74a1688fd08fdb89edbc25d9a6b2b27c61c2748f7a3b5c3c43f6 +size 30895 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..811f0822c74d62ebee17696364246f4ac707ec7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.12-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,455 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.12 + +(08/95) + +# **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** --- + +# **ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR BALANCED DOUBLE-CURRENT INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS FOR INTERFACES WITH DATA SIGNALLING RATES UP TO 52 Mbit/s** + +## **ITU-T Recommendation V.12** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation V.12 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 14 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 29th of August 1995. + +# --- NOTES + +1. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. +2. The status of annexes and appendices attached to the Series V Recommendations should be interpreted as follows: + - an *annexes* to a Recommendation forms an integral part of the Recommendation; + - an *appendix* to a Recommendation does not form part of the Recommendation and only provides some complementary explanation or information specific to that Recommendation. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 2 | +| 3 Definitions..... | 2 | +| 4 Electrical characteristics..... | 2 | +| 4.1 Generator characteristics..... | 3 | +| 4.1.1 Open circuit measurement..... | 3 | +| 4.1.2 Test termination measurements..... | 3 | +| 4.1.3 Short-circuit measurement ..... | 4 | +| 4.1.4 Output signal waveform..... | 4 | +| 4.2 Load characteristics ..... | 5 | +| 4.2.1 Input current-voltage measurements ..... | 5 | +| 4.2.2 Input sensitivity measurements ..... | 6 | +| 4.2.3 Cable termination..... | 7 | +| 4.2.4 Fail-safe operation ..... | 7 | +| 4.3 Interconnecting cable electrical characteristics..... | 8 | +| 5 Circuit protection ..... | 8 | +| Appendix I – Guidelines for application ..... | 8 | +| I.1 Example on an interconnecting cable ..... | 8 | +| I.1.1 Length ..... | 8 | +| I.1.2 Cable physical characteristics ..... | 9 | +| I.1.3 Cable termination..... | 9 | +| I.2 Examples of generators and receivers ..... | 9 | +| I.2.1 ECL – Emitter coupled logic technology ..... | 9 | +| I.2.2 Fail-safe biasing of receivers ..... | 9 | + +# **SUMMARY** + +This Recommendation specifies the electrical characteristics of a balanced digital interchange circuit, that may be employed when specified for the interchange of serial binary signals between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) or in any point-to-point interconnection of serial binary signals between data equipments. The balanced digital interchange circuit will normally be utilized on data and timing, or control circuits where the data signalling rate is up to a maximum limit of 52 Mbit/s. + +# **ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR BALANCED DOUBLE-CURRENT INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS FOR INTERFACES WITH DATA SIGNALLING RATES UP TO 52 Mbit/s** + +*(Geneva, 1995)* + +# **1 Scope** + +This Recommendation specifies the electrical characteristics of a balanced digital interchange circuit, normally implemented in integrated circuit technology, that may be employed when specified for the interchange of serial binary signals between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) or in any point-to-point interconnection of serial binary signals between data equipments. + +The interchange circuit includes a generator connected by a balanced interconnecting cable to a load consisting of a receiver and a termination. The electrical characteristics of the circuit are specified in terms of required voltage, and current values obtained from direct measurements of the generator and receiver components at the interchange points. The logic function of the generator and the receiver is not defined by this Recommendation, as it is application dependent. Minimum electrical requirements for the interconnecting cable are furnished. + +The provisions of this Recommendation may be applied to the circuits employed at the interchange between equipments where information being conveyed is in the form of binary signals. + +Typical points of applicability for this Recommendation are depicted in Figure 1. + +![Diagram showing the application of a balanced digital interchange circuit between DTE and DCE equipment. The DTE side contains an Interface Generator and an Interface Receiver. The DCE side contains an Interface Receiver and an Interface Generator. Two balanced interface circuits connect the generator of one side to the receiver of the other side. A legend below defines the symbols: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment), DCE (Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment), Interface Generator (arrow pointing right), Interface Receiver (arrow pointing left), and Balanced Interface Circuit (two parallel lines). The reference T1401070-94/d01 is noted at the bottom right of the diagram.](d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg) + +T1401070-94/d01 + +DTE      Data Terminal Equipment +DCE      Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment + +Interface Generator +Interface Receiver +Balanced Interface Circuit + +Diagram showing the application of a balanced digital interchange circuit between DTE and DCE equipment. The DTE side contains an Interface Generator and an Interface Receiver. The DCE side contains an Interface Receiver and an Interface Generator. Two balanced interface circuits connect the generator of one side to the receiver of the other side. A legend below defines the symbols: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment), DCE (Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment), Interface Generator (arrow pointing right), Interface Receiver (arrow pointing left), and Balanced Interface Circuit (two parallel lines). The reference T1401070-94/d01 is noted at the bottom right of the diagram. + +FIGURE 1/V.12 +**Applications of balanced digital interchange circuit** + +The balanced digital interchange circuit will normally be utilized on data and timing, or control circuits where the data signalling rate is up to a maximum limit of 52 Mbit/s. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other referenced Standards are subject to revision, all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- ITU-T Recommendation V.11 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s.* + +# 3 Definitions + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following definition applies: + +**3.1 star (\*):** It represents the opposite input condition for a parameter. For example, the symbol Q represents the receiver output state for one input condition, while Q\* represents the output state for the opposite input state. + +# 4 Electrical characteristics + +The balanced digital interchange circuit is shown in Figure 2. The circuit consists of three parts: the generator (G), the balanced interconnecting cable, and the load. The load is composed of a receiver (R) and a cable termination/fail-safe network. The electrical characteristics of the generator and the receiver are specified in terms of direct electrical measurements while the interconnecting cable is described in terms of its electrical characteristics. + +![Circuit diagram of a balanced digital interchange circuit. The diagram is divided into three sections: Generator, Balanced interface cable, and Load. The Generator section contains a triangle symbol 'G' with two output lines, A and B, each with a pull-down resistor 'Rgp = 332 Ω' connected to 'Vee'. The Balanced interface cable section shows two parallel lines connecting points A, B to A', B'. The Load section contains a triangle symbol 'R' with two input lines, A' and B', each with a pull-up resistor 'Rrp = 1.5 k Ω' connected to 'Vee'. A termination resistor 'Rt = 110 Ω' is connected between A' and B'. A common potential difference 'Vcpd' is indicated between the common points C and C'.](6df5629bc2fc6d82f1a1edf9d7340113_img.jpg) + +T1401080-94/d02 + +Circuit diagram of a balanced digital interchange circuit. The diagram is divided into three sections: Generator, Balanced interface cable, and Load. The Generator section contains a triangle symbol 'G' with two output lines, A and B, each with a pull-down resistor 'Rgp = 332 Ω' connected to 'Vee'. The Balanced interface cable section shows two parallel lines connecting points A, B to A', B'. The Load section contains a triangle symbol 'R' with two input lines, A' and B', each with a pull-up resistor 'Rrp = 1.5 k Ω' connected to 'Vee'. A termination resistor 'Rt = 110 Ω' is connected between A' and B'. A common potential difference 'Vcpd' is indicated between the common points C and C'. + +| | | | | +|------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------| +| G | Generator | A, B | Generator Interface Points | +| Rgp | Generator Pull Down Resistor | A', B' | Receiver Interface Points | +| R | Receiver | C | Generator Circuit Common | +| Rt | Termination Resistor | C' | Receiver Circuit Common | +| Rrp | Receiver Bias Resistor (Optional, Receiver Dependent) | | | +| Vcpd | Common Potential Difference | | | +| Vee | Negative Voltage Power Supply | | | + +NOTE – All resistors $\pm 2\%$ . + +FIGURE 2/V.12 +Balanced digital interchange circuit + +## 4.1 Generator characteristics + +The generator electrical characteristics are specified in accordance with the measurements illustrated in Figures 3 to 6 and described in 4.1.1 through 4.1.4. The generator circuit meeting these requirements results in a low impedance balanced source that will produce a differential voltage applied to the interconnecting cable in the range of 590 mV to 1500 mV. + +The signalling sense of the voltages appearing across the interconnecting cable are defined as follows: + +- a) The A terminal of the generator shall be negative with respect to the B terminal for a binary 0 (SPACE or OFF) state. +- b) The A terminal of the generator shall be positive with respect to the B terminal for a binary 1 (MARK or ON) state. + +NOTE – The sense of data binary 0 (SPACE) and data binary 1 (MARK) are inverted from that specified in Recommendation V.11. The logic function of the generator and the receiver is beyond the scope of this Recommendation, and therefore is not defined. + +#### 4.1.1 Open circuit measurement (Figure 3) + +For either binary state, the magnitude of the differential voltage ( $V_{oc}$ or $V_{oc}^*$ ) measured between the two generator output terminals shall not exceed 1.5 V. + +![Circuit diagram for open circuit measurement of the generator. A logic generator 'G' has two outputs, A and B. Each output is connected to a 332 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a Vee terminal. A voltmeter measures the differential voltage Voc between terminals A and B. The diagram includes the text 'Open circuit measurement' and the inequalities |Voc| < 1.5 V and |Voc*| < 1.5 V. A legend shows a circle with an arrow pointing to the text 'Measured Parameter'. The reference T1401090-94/d03 is also present.](1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg) + +Steady state logic input (1 or 0) + +332 $\Omega$ + +332 $\Omega$ + +Vee + +Vee + +A + +B + +$V_{oc}$ + +Open circuit measurement + +$|V_{oc}| < 1.5 \text{ V}, \quad |V_{oc}^*| < 1.5 \text{ V}$ + +T1401090-94/d03 + +Measured Parameter + +Circuit diagram for open circuit measurement of the generator. A logic generator 'G' has two outputs, A and B. Each output is connected to a 332 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a Vee terminal. A voltmeter measures the differential voltage Voc between terminals A and B. The diagram includes the text 'Open circuit measurement' and the inequalities |Voc| < 1.5 V and |Voc\*| < 1.5 V. A legend shows a circle with an arrow pointing to the text 'Measured Parameter'. The reference T1401090-94/d03 is also present. + +FIGURE 3/V.12 +Open circuit measurement + +#### 4.1.2 Test termination measurements (Figure 4) + +With a test load of the resistors shown in Figure 4, the magnitude of the differential output voltage ( $V_t$ ), shall be 590 mV or greater. For the opposite binary state, the polarity of $V_t$ shall be reversed ( $V_t^*$ ). The magnitude of the difference between $V_t$ and $V_t^*$ shall be less than 100 mV. The value of the generator offset voltage ( $V_{os}$ ), measured between the centre point of the test load and the generator circuit common shall be in the range of $-1.6 \text{ V}$ to 0 for either binary state. The magnitude of the difference of $V_{os}$ for one binary state and $V_{os}^*$ for the opposite binary state shall be 100 mV or less. + +![Circuit diagram for Figure 4/V.12: Test termination measurements. A generator G with steady state logic input (0 or 1) is connected to two 332 Ω resistors leading to terminals A and B. Both A and B are connected to Vee through switches. A load consisting of two 54.9 Ω resistors in series is connected between A and B. A voltmeter Vt measures the voltage across this load. Another voltmeter Vos measures the common-mode voltage at the center tap of the load relative to ground. A legend shows a circle with an arrow labeled 'Measured Parameter'.](3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg) + +Steady state logic input (0 or 1) + +332 $\Omega$ + +332 $\Omega$ + +Vee + +Vee + +A + +B + +54.9 $\Omega$ + +54.9 $\Omega$ + +Vt + +Vos + +T1401100-94/d04 + +*Test termination measurements* + $|V_t| > 590 \text{ mV}, |V_t^*| > 590 \text{ mV}$ + $||V_t| - |V_t^*|| < 100 \text{ mV}$ + $0 \text{ V} > V_{os} > -1.6 \text{ V}, 0 \text{ V} > V_{os}^* > -1.6 \text{ V}$ + $|V_{os} - V_{os}^*| < 100 \text{ mV}$ + +Measured Parameter + +Circuit diagram for Figure 4/V.12: Test termination measurements. A generator G with steady state logic input (0 or 1) is connected to two 332 Ω resistors leading to terminals A and B. Both A and B are connected to Vee through switches. A load consisting of two 54.9 Ω resistors in series is connected between A and B. A voltmeter Vt measures the voltage across this load. Another voltmeter Vos measures the common-mode voltage at the center tap of the load relative to ground. A legend shows a circle with an arrow labeled 'Measured Parameter'. + +FIGURE 4/V.12 +**Test termination measurements** + +#### 4.1.3 Short-circuit measurement (Figure 5) + +With the generator output terminals short-circuited, the magnitude of the current ( $I_{os}$ ) between the output terminals shall not exceed 50 mA for either state. + +![Circuit diagram for Figure 5/V.12: Short-circuit measurement. Similar to Figure 4, but the load is replaced by a short circuit between terminals A and B. An ammeter Ios measures the current flowing through the short circuit. The legend for 'Measured Parameter' is repeated.](35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg) + +Steady state logic input (0 or 1) + +332 $\Omega$ + +332 $\Omega$ + +Vee + +Vee + +A + +B + +Ios + +T1401110-94/d05 + +*Short-circuit measurement* + $|I_{os}| < 50 \text{ mA}, |I_{os}^*| < 50 \text{ mA}$ + +Measured Parameter + +Circuit diagram for Figure 5/V.12: Short-circuit measurement. Similar to Figure 4, but the load is replaced by a short circuit between terminals A and B. An ammeter Ios measures the current flowing through the short circuit. The legend for 'Measured Parameter' is repeated. + +FIGURE 5/V.12 +**Short-circuit measurement** + +#### 4.1.4 Output signal waveform (Figure 6) + +During transitions of the generator output between alternating binary states (one-zero-one-zero, etc.), the differential voltage measured across the 110 $\Omega$ test load connected between the generator output terminals shall be such that the voltage monotonically changes between 0.2 and 0.8 of $V_{ss}$ within 0.5 ns to 2.3 ns. After achieving a steady state value, the signal voltage shall not vary more than 10% of $V_{ss}$ from that value, until the next binary transition occurs, and at no time shall the instantaneous magnitude of $V_t$ or $V_t^*$ exceed 1500 mV nor be less than 590 mV. $V_{ss}$ is defined as the voltage difference between the two steady state values of the generator output. + +![Figure 6/V.12: Output signal waveform. The diagram shows a differential signal waveform with a 0 V Differential baseline. The signal transitions between levels of 1.1 Vss, 0.9 Vss, 0.8 Vss, and 0.2 Vss. Key timing parameters are labeled: tb (nominal time duration of the unit interval), tr (rise time), and tf (fall time).](352c5fab6f936356e9570761a02ab71e_img.jpg) + +Figure 6/V.12: Output signal waveform. The diagram shows a differential signal waveform with a 0 V Differential baseline. The signal transitions between levels of 1.1 Vss, 0.9 Vss, 0.8 Vss, and 0.2 Vss. Key timing parameters are labeled: tb (nominal time duration of the unit interval), tr (rise time), and tf (fall time). + +$t_b$ The nominal time duration of the unit interval at the applicable data signalling rate + $0.5 \text{ ns} < t_r \text{ or } t_f < 2.3 \text{ ns}$ + $V_{ss}$ Difference in the steady state voltages + $V_{ss} = |V_t - V_t^*|$ + +![Circuit diagram of the output signal waveform measurement setup. A driver (G) is connected to terminals A and B. Each terminal is connected to Vee through a 332 Ω resistor. A 110 Ω load is connected between A and B, where the differential voltage Vt is measured. The diagram is labeled T1401120-94/D06.](562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg) + +Circuit diagram of the output signal waveform measurement setup. A driver (G) is connected to terminals A and B. Each terminal is connected to Vee through a 332 Ω resistor. A 110 Ω load is connected between A and B, where the differential voltage Vt is measured. The diagram is labeled T1401120-94/D06. + +FIGURE 6/V.12 +**Output signal waveform** + +### 4.2 Load characteristics + +The load is composed of a receiver (R) and a termination/fail-safe network as shown in Figure 2. The electrical characteristics of a receiver without termination or fail-safe provision are specified in terms of measurements illustrated in Figures 7 to 9 and described in 4.2.1 and 4.2.2. A circuit meeting these requirements results in a differential receiver having a high input impedance, and a small input threshold between $\pm 150 \text{ mV}$ . + +#### 4.2.1 Input current-voltage measurements (Figure 7) + +With the voltage on one leg, $V_{ia}$ (or $V_{ib}$ ), ranging from $-0.5 \text{ V}$ to $-2.0 \text{ V}$ , while the voltage on the other leg, $V_{ib}$ (or $V_{ia}$ ), is held at $-1.32 \text{ V}$ , the resultant input current $I_{ia}$ (or $I_{ib}$ ) shall be no greater than $350 \mu\text{A}$ . These measurements apply with the receiver's power supplies in both power-on and power-off conditions (as defined by the integrated circuit manufacturer). Note that these measurements are made with any termination resistor or fail-safe provision disconnected. + +![Circuit diagram for receiver input current-voltage measurements. A receiver block 'R' has inputs A', B', and C'. A common input line is connected to A' and B'. Two voltage sources, Via and Vib, are connected in series to this common line. Currents Iia and Iib are indicated flowing into the inputs. The receiver is grounded at C'.](a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + S1(( )) -- Via --> A'[A'] + S2(( )) -- Vib --> B'[B'] + A' --> R[R] + B' --> R + C'[C'] --> R + R --- G[Ground] + Iia(( )) -.-> A' + Iib(( )) -.-> B' + +``` + +T1401130-94/d07 + +Circuit diagram for receiver input current-voltage measurements. A receiver block 'R' has inputs A', B', and C'. A common input line is connected to A' and B'. Two voltage sources, Via and Vib, are connected in series to this common line. Currents Iia and Iib are indicated flowing into the inputs. The receiver is grounded at C'. + +FIGURE 7/V.12 +**Receiver input current-voltage measurements** + +#### 4.2.2 Input sensitivity measurements (Figure 8) + +Over an entire input voltage range of $-0.5\text{ V}$ to $-2.0\text{ V}$ (referenced to receiver circuit common), the receiver shall not require a differential input voltage of more than $150\text{ mV}$ to correctly assume the intended binary state. Reversing the polarity of $V_i$ shall cause the receiver to assume the opposite binary state. The receiver is required to maintain correct operation for differential input voltages ranging between $150\text{ mV}$ and $1.5\text{ V}$ in magnitude. Note that these measurements are made with any termination resistor or fail-safe provision disconnected. + +![Figure 8/V.12: Input sensitivity measurements. The left part shows a circuit diagram where a receiver 'R' has inputs A', B', and C'. A common mode voltage Vcm is applied to all inputs. A differential input voltage Vi is applied between A' and B'. The right part is a graph of Vi (V) measured from B' to A' versus time. The graph shows a trapezoidal pulse with a peak-to-peak value of 1.5 V. The transition region is marked between +150 mV and -150 mV. The maximum operational range is indicated as the total voltage swing from +1.5 V to -1.5 V.](6b32b7b928d34eeccb15c29cdf9d2cb3_img.jpg) + +Vcm    $-0.575\text{ V to } -1.925\text{ V}$ + +Vi (V) measured from B' to A' + +T1401140-94/d08 + +Figure 8/V.12: Input sensitivity measurements. The left part shows a circuit diagram where a receiver 'R' has inputs A', B', and C'. A common mode voltage Vcm is applied to all inputs. A differential input voltage Vi is applied between A' and B'. The right part is a graph of Vi (V) measured from B' to A' versus time. The graph shows a trapezoidal pulse with a peak-to-peak value of 1.5 V. The transition region is marked between +150 mV and -150 mV. The maximum operational range is indicated as the total voltage swing from +1.5 V to -1.5 V. + +FIGURE 8/V.12 +**Input sensitivity measurements** + +Figure 9 illustrates the minimum and maximum operating voltages of the receiver. Note that the logic function of the receiver is not defined by this Recommendation. + +![Circuit diagram of a receiver input stage. A balanced differential input is shown with terminals A', B', and C'. A voltage source Vvia is connected between A' and B'. A voltage source Vib is connected between B' and C'. The differential voltage Vid is measured between A' and B'. The receiver is represented by a triangle labeled 'R' with its non-inverting input connected to A' and its inverting input connected to B'. The output of the receiver is connected to C'. A ground symbol is shown at the bottom right. A legend below the diagram shows a circle with an arrow pointing to it labeled 'Measured Parameter' and a circle with an arrow pointing away from it labeled 'Applied Voltage'.](5b4e774d63e0e0ed73801a9247755e5f_img.jpg) + +T1401150-94/d09 + +Circuit diagram of a receiver input stage. A balanced differential input is shown with terminals A', B', and C'. A voltage source Vvia is connected between A' and B'. A voltage source Vib is connected between B' and C'. The differential voltage Vid is measured between A' and B'. The receiver is represented by a triangle labeled 'R' with its non-inverting input connected to A' and its inverting input connected to B'. The output of the receiver is connected to C'. A ground symbol is shown at the bottom right. A legend below the diagram shows a circle with an arrow pointing to it labeled 'Measured Parameter' and a circle with an arrow pointing away from it labeled 'Applied Voltage'. + +NOTE $V_{cm} = (V_{ia} + V_{ib})/2$ , $V_{id} = V_{ia} - V_{ib}$ . + +| Applied voltages | | Resulting input voltage | Resulting common mode voltage | +|------------------|---------|-------------------------|-------------------------------| +| Via | Vib | Vid | Vcm | +| -0.50 V | -0.65 V | +0.150 V | -0.575 V | +| -0.65 V | -0.50 V | -0.150 V | -0.575 V | +| -0.50 V | -2.00 V | +1.50 V | -1.25 V | +| -2.00 V | -0.50 V | -1.50 V | -1.25 V | +| -1.85 V | -2.00 V | +0.150 V | -1.925 V | +| -2.00 V | -1.85 V | -0.150 V | -1.925 V | + +FIGURE 9/V.12 + +##### Receiver input sensitivity table + +#### 4.2.3 Cable termination + +For all applications, the use of a cable termination is required. The recommended value is $110 \Omega \pm 2\%$ . The termination resistor is connected across the cable at the load end of the cable, as close to the receiver input poles as possible. + +#### 4.2.4 Fail-safe operation + +Other Recommendations and specifications using these electrical characteristics of the balanced digital interchange circuit may require that specific interchange circuits be made fail-safe to certain fault conditions. Such fault conditions may include one or more of the following: + +- 1) open-circuited interconnecting cable; +- 2) generator in power-off condition. + +When detection of one or more of the above fault conditions is required by specific applications, additional provisions are required in the load, and the following items must be determined and specified. + +- 1) Which interchange circuits require fault detection? +- 2) What faults must be detected? +- 3) What action must be taken when a fault is detected? + +The method of detection of fault conditions is application-dependent and is therefore not further specified. (See 1.2.2.) + +## 4.3 Interconnecting cable electrical characteristics + +The cable shall consist of twisted pair conductors and have an overall shield. The two wires of each pair shall be connected to the same signal, one to the A/A' and the other to the B/B' signal poles. + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------| +| Maximum single conductor DC Resistance (DCR) at 20 °C | 3.5 $\Omega$ | +| Differential Impedance at 50 MHz | 110 $\Omega \pm 11 \Omega$ | +| Maximum Signal Attenuation at 50 MHz | 4.5 dB | +| Mutual Capacitance within pair at 1 kHz | 47.6 $\pm$ 6.5 pF/m | +| Propagation Delay maximum: | 79 ns | +| Skew (pair-to-pair) | 2.0 ns | + +See Appendix I.1.2 for further guidance on an example of an interconnecting cable. + +## 5 Circuit protection + +Balanced digital interchange generator and receiver devices, under either the power-on or power-off condition, complying to this Recommendation shall not be damaged under the following conditions: + +- a) generator open circuit; +- b) short-circuit across the balanced interconnecting cable; +- c) short-circuit to circuit common. + +# Appendix I + +## Guidelines for application + +## I.1 Example on an interconnecting cable + +The following subclause provides further information to 4.3 and provides additional guidance concerning operational constraints imposed by the cable parameters of length and termination. + +### I.1.1 Length + +The nominal length of cable separating the generator and the load is 15 metres. + +#### I.1.2 Cable physical characteristics + +The following physical characteristics apply to the cable: + +| | | +|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Conductor: | 0.08 mm 2 , 7 strands of 0.13 mm, tinned annealed copper, nominal diameter 0.38 mm. | +| Insulation: | Polyethylene or polypropylene; 0.24 mm nominal wall thickness; 0.86 mm $\pm$ 0.025 mm outside diameter. | +| Foil Shield: | 0.051 mm nominal aluminium/polyester laminated tape spiral wrapped around the cable core. | +| Braid Shield: | Braided 0.13 mm, tinned plated copper in accordance with 80% minimum coverage, in electrical contact with the aluminium of the foil shield. | +| Outside Diameter: | $\leq$ 10.6 mm. | + +#### I.1.3 Cable termination + +The characteristic impedance of twisted pair cable is a function of frequency, wire size and type as well as the kind of insulating materials employed. For example, the characteristic impedance of average 0.08 mm2, copper conductor, plastic insulated twisted pair cable, to a 50 MHz sine wave will be approximately 110 $\Omega$ . + +## I.2 Examples of generators and receivers + +#### I.2.1 ECL – Emitter coupled logic technology + +Emitter Coupled Logic (ECL) families such as 10K, 10H, and 100K have been developed that meet the requirements of this Recommendation by a number of integrated circuit manufacturers. The 100K family is compensated for both Power Supply Voltage and Operating Temperature variations; offering constant thresholds and output levels over both ranges. Some other families are only Power Supply Voltage compensated. The 100K family also accepts a wide range of power supply voltages (Vee) from –4.2 V to –5.7 V. + +#### I.2.2 Fail-safe biasing of receivers (Figure I.1) + +In the event that the interchange cable is not present, the receiver must default to a known state. The method of fail-safe biasing is application and component specific, therefore is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +External resistors can be used to bias the receiver's input into a known state ( $\geq$ 150 mV differential) for the case of the disconnected cable. For example, a 1.5 k $\Omega$ pull-up and pull-down resistor will bias the receiver to 177 mV, defaulting the receiver to an OFF state. + +![Circuit diagram for receiver fail-safe biasing. It shows a differential receiver 'R' with two inputs, A' and B'. Input A' is connected to a 1.5 kΩ resistor pulling up to Vee. A 110 Ω resistor is connected between inputs A' and B'. Input B' is connected to a 1.5 kΩ resistor pulling down to ground. The diagram is labeled T1401160-94/d10.](5a9282ac54ca7bc50f1d2ab6cfb376ba_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a fail-safe biasing circuit for a differential receiver 'R'. The receiver has two inputs, A' and B'. Input A' is connected to a 1.5 k $\Omega$ resistor that pulls the signal up to the negative supply voltage Vee. A 110 $\Omega$ termination resistor is connected between inputs A' and B'. Input B' is connected to a 1.5 k $\Omega$ resistor that pulls the signal down to ground. The diagram is labeled T1401160-94/d10. + +Circuit diagram for receiver fail-safe biasing. It shows a differential receiver 'R' with two inputs, A' and B'. Input A' is connected to a 1.5 kΩ resistor pulling up to Vee. A 110 Ω resistor is connected between inputs A' and B'. Input B' is connected to a 1.5 kΩ resistor pulling down to ground. The diagram is labeled T1401160-94/d10. + +FIGURE I.1/V.12 + +**Receiver fail-safe biasing** + +It should be noted that it is not necessary to use external resistors on all families of receivers. Some receiver integrated circuits have this feature internal to the integrated circuit. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.13-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.13-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fbd16a860c7edea924ee5d016558768ac7f0a47 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.13-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, crossed by a lightning bolt.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, crossed by a lightning bolt. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.13 + +(03/93) + +### DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +--- + +### SIMULATED CARRIER CONTROL + +### ITU-T Recommendation V.13 + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation V.13 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XVII (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +## --- NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# SIMULATED CARRIER CONTROL + +(Melbourne, 1988; revised Helsinki, 1993) + +The CCITT + +*considering* + +- (a) that there is a wide variety of duplex data systems available; +- (b) that some data terminal equipment (DTE) operate 2-way alternate over these systems. + +*recommends* + +that the following procedure be employed for simulated circuit 105 to circuit 109 operation, when specifically called for in a CCITT Recommendation. + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation applies wherever a requirement for control of a remote circuit 109 by a local circuit 105 exists, and where switching OFF and ON of a modem carrier is impossible or impractical. Examples of such environments are: + +- sub-channels of modems containing multiplex facilities; +- modems with long equalizer/echo canceller training sequences; +- high efficiency multiplexers containing no control channels; +- PCM channels used for 64 bit/s data transmission. + +## 2 Location of the simulation function + +Within this Recommendation the function is described as though it were located between the DTE and the remaining part of the data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE). Location with respect to the loop device as defined in Recommendation V.54 is for further study. + +## 3 Operation + +When circuit 105 is OFF the DCE will transmit a pattern of bits (idle pattern) produced by scrambling a binary 1 with the polynomial $1 + x^{-3} + x^{-7}$ , in lieu of data bits for that port. No particular starting state is specified for the scrambler. When circuit 105 turns ON, the DCE will immediately transmit a pattern of 8 bits (ON pattern) produced by scrambling a binary 0 with the polynomial $1 + x^{-3} + x^{-7}$ , after which data bits are sent (Note 1). Circuit 106 may be turned ON within 8 bit intervals after circuit 105 turns ON, and the first bit appearing on circuit 103 after circuit 106 turns ON should be sent as the first data bit (see Note 2). When circuit 106 is turned ON before transmission of the ON pattern has been completed, data bits appearing on circuit 103 are stored in a data buffer for subsequent transmission. + +At the remote DCE circuit 109 is turned OFF whenever a sufficient number of successive bits in the above idle pattern is detected (see Note 3). Circuit 109 is turned ON after detecting a pattern of 8 bits produced by scrambling a binary 0 with the polynomial $1 + x^{-3} + x^{-7}$ (Note 4). Circuit 104 (received data) is held at binary 1 when circuit 109 is OFF (see also Notes 5, 6, 7). + +## NOTES + +- 1 The starting state of the scrambler used for scrambling a binary 0 with the polynomial $1 + x^{-3} + x^{-7}$ should be the same as the ending scrambler state after scrambling binary 1. +- 2 Additional circuit 106 turn ON delays may be provided as manufacturer's options. +- 3 The number of successive bits of the idle pattern required to be detected to turn circuit 109 OFF is recommended to be 48-64. Before circuit 109 turns OFF, the idle pattern may appear on circuit 104. +- 4 It is recommended that circuit 109 be turned ON only if the ON pattern is preceded by a sufficient number of consecutive scrambled ones. The protection against failure to recognize the ON pattern when transmission errors occur is subject to further study. The length of the ON pattern required to be detected to turn circuit 109 ON is provisionally fixed to 8. +- 5 Following an ON to OFF transition of circuit 105, circuit 105 should be ignored for at least 128 bit intervals so that at least 128 bits produced by scrambling a binary 1 are sent to the remote modem. +- 6 When circuit 105 is OFF, precaution should be taken that the output of the scrambler is not continuous 1, but rather is a 127 bit pseudo-random sequence. +- 7 Circuit 109 may be erroneously turned ON at the time of receiving the idle pattern, or circuit 109 may remain OFF at the time of receiving the ON pattern, when transmission errors occur. It may also turn OFF due to simulation by user data. +- 8 In order to prevent circuit 109 from incorrectly staying in the OFF condition, due to a failure to detect the ON pattern, it is recommended that circuit 109 should be placed in the ON condition, following a reasonable period of time during which the OFF pattern has not been detected. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.130-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.130-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09eb7cde323087cb21ed297794b988d34bfcf7ed --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.130-199508-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,714 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.130 + +(08/95) + +**DATA COMMUNICATION OVER +THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +--- + +**ISDN TERMINAL ADAPTOR FRAMEWORK** + +**ITU-T Recommendation V.130** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation V.130 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 14 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 29th of August 1995. + +--- + +# NOTES + +1. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. +2. The status of annexes and appendices attached to the Series V Recommendations should be interpreted as follows: + - an *annex* to a Recommendation forms an integral part of the Recommendation; + - an *appendix* to a Recommendation does not form part of the Recommendation and only provides some complementary explanation or information specific to that Recommendation. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Scope and introduction..... | 1 | +| | 1.1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| | 1.2 Introduction ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions..... | 3 | +| 4 | Abbreviations ..... | 3 | +| 5 | Reference models ..... | 3 | +| | 5.1 Functional reference model ..... | 4 | +| | 5.2 Protocol reference model ..... | 6 | +| | 5.3 Interworking model ..... | 8 | +| | 5.4 Call mapping model..... | 9 | +| 6 | Connection establishment (Call control)..... | 9 | +| | 6.1 Auto-calling procedures..... | 9 | +| | 6.2 Multi-Use bearer service applications ..... | 10 | +| 7 | Rate adaptation protocol and parameter negotiation ..... | 11 | +| | 7.1 Out-of-band (Q.931) procedures ..... | 12 | +| | 7.2 In-band negotiation procedures ..... | 12 | +| 8 | TE2 – TA interface considerations..... | 13 | +| | 8.1 Physical interfaces ..... | 13 | +| | 8.2 Flow control and buffering ..... | 13 | +| | 8.3 Embedded interfaces..... | 13 | +| 9 | Multi-protocol terminal adaptor ..... | 14 | +| 10 | Adaptation to 3.1 kHz audio bearer (GSTN interworking)..... | 15 | +| | 10.1 Introduction ..... | 15 | +| | 10.2 Terminal adaptor with codec ..... | 15 | +| | 10.3 Combined modem and terminal adaptor..... | 16 | +| 11 | Management..... | 17 | +| | Appendix I – Protocol model for a V.110 TA (asynchronous mode) ..... | 17 | + +# **SUMMARY** + +This Recommendation provides information on the functions of a terminal adaptor from both the conceptual and practical points of view. The expression “Terminal Adaptor” is commonly used to refer to a stand-alone item of equipment (or alternatively a printed circuit card plugged into a terminal) that allows a non-ISDN terminal to be connected to an ISDN user-network interface. Formally though, Terminal Adaptor (TA) is the name of one of the (conceptual) Functional Groups defined in Recommendation I.411. The TA Functional Group contains functions that allow a TE2 (non-ISDN) terminal to use the services provided by an ISDN. The popular understanding of the term TA is thus well aligned with the theoretical definition. This Recommendation coordinates information from other Recommendations, expands on topics only briefly discussed elsewhere, describes the relationship between Terminal Adaptors and Modems, and provides tutorial material, and guidance on future enhancements and applications. + +# ISDN TERMINAL ADAPTOR FRAMEWORK + +(Geneva, 1995) + +# 1 Scope and introduction + +## 1.1 Scope + +The purpose of this ISDN Terminal Adaptor Framework Recommendation is to: + +- a) coordinate information from other Recommendations; +- b) expand on topics only briefly discussed elsewhere; +- c) describe the relationship between Terminal Adaptors and Modems; +- d) provide tutorial material; +- e) provide guidance on future enhancements and applications. + +## 1.2 Introduction + +Formally, the expression “Terminal Adaptor” (TA) refers to one of the (conceptual) Functional Groups defined in Recommendation I.411. The TA is described in 3.4.4/I.411 and contains functions that allow a TE2 (non-ISDN) terminal to use the services provided by an ISDN. + +However, the expression “Terminal Adaptor” is also used to refer to a stand-alone item of equipment (or alternatively a printed circuit card plugged into a terminal) that allows a non-ISDN terminal to be connected to an ISDN user-network interface. + +Also, there already exist a number of Recommendations which describe terminal adaptors and terminal adaptation protocols that allow terminals conforming to V- or X-Series Recommendations to be connected to the ISDN. Certain material in these Recommendations is of more general application and is referred to in this Recommendation. + +This Recommendation examines in detail the functions of a terminal adaptor from both the conceptual and practical points of view. + +Clause 10 describes a particular type of TA which is a combination of TA and modem functions. It allows a V-Series DTE to be connected to the ISDN and use the 3.1 kHz audio bearer service to communicate with another V-Series DTE attached via a modem to the GSTN. This means that no network-provided interworking function (modem pool) is required, only the digital-to-analogue conversion and signalling facilities that are already provided for telephony. + +# 2 References + +The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- CCITT Recommendation G.711 (1988), *Pulse code modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies*. +- ITU-T Recommendation H.244 (1995), *Synchronized aggregation of ISDN B-channels*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.231.9 (1993), *Circuit mode 64 kbit/s and 8 kHz structured multi-use bearer service category*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.320 (1993), *ISDN protocol reference model*. +- ITU-T Recommendation I.333 (1993), *Terminal selection in ISDN*. + +- ITU-T Recommendation I.411 (1993), *ISDN user-network interfaces – Reference configurations.* +- ITU-T Recommendation I.430 (1993), *Basic user-network interface – Layer 1 specification.* +- ITU-T Recommendation I.431 (1993), *Primary rate user-network interface – Layer 1 specification.* +- ITU-T Recommendation I.501 (1993), *Service interworking.* +- ITU-T Recommendation I.515 (1993), *Parameter exchange for ISDN interworking.* +- ITU-T Recommendation I.530 (1993) *Network interworking between an ISDN and a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).* +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (1993), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control.* +- ITU-T Recommendations T.200-Series1), *Programming communication interface for terminal equipment connected to ISDN.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 (1994), *Procedures for starting sessions of data transmission over the general switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.10 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates nominally up to 100 kbit/s.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.11 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.14 (1993), *Transmission of start-stop characters over synchronous bearer channels.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.24 (1993) *List of definitions for interchange circuits between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE).* +- CCITT Recommendation V.25 bis (1988), *Automatic calling and/or answering equipment on the General Switched Telephone Network (GSTN) using the 100-series interchange circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.25 ter (1995), *Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and control.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.28 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.12 (1995), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits for interfaces with data signalling rates up to 52 Mbit/s.* +- CCITT Recommendation V.42 bis (1988) *Data compression procedures for Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) using error correcting procedures.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.58 (1994), *Management information model for V-Series DCEs.* +- CCITT Recommendation V.110 (I.463) (1992), *Support of data terminal equipment with V-Series type interfaces by an integrated services digital network.* +- CCITT Recommendation V.120 (I.465) (1992), *Support by an ISDN of data terminal equipment with V-Series type interfaces with provision for statistical multiplexing.* +- CCITT Recommendation X.24 (1988), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) on public data networks.* +- ITU-T Recommendation X.25 (1993), *Interface between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) for terminals operating in the packet mode and connected to public data networks by dedicated circuit.* + +--- + +1) Presently at the stage of draft. + +- ITU-T Recommendation X.30 (I.461) (1993), *Support of X.21, X.21 bis and X.20 bis based data terminal equipments DTEs by an Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN)*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.31 (I.462) (1993), *Support of packet mode terminal equipment by an ISDN*. +- ISO/IEC 2110:1989, *Information technology – Data communication – 25-pole DTE/DCE interface connector and contact number assignments*. +- ISO/IEC 13871, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Private telecommunications networks – Digital channel aggregation*. + +# 3 Definitions + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following definition applies: + +**3.1      **modem:**** The term modem is used to refer to a functional block (sometimes called a digital modem) whose overall functionality is equivalent to that of a modem connected to a codec. A modem has no internal analogue components and only digital interfaces. + +# 4 Abbreviations + +For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following abbreviations are used: + +| | | +|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| BC | Bearer Capability | +| CLI | Calling Line Identification | +| DTE | Data Terminal Equipment | +| HLC | High Layer Compatibility | +| IPE | In-band Parameter Exchange | +| IWF | Interworking Function | +| LLC | Low Layer Compatibility | +| MIB | Management Information Base | +| MSN | Multiple Subscriber Number | +| MTA | Multi-protocol Terminal Adaptor | +| NT | Network Termination | +| PID | Protocol Identification | +| SUB | Sub-addressing | +| TA | Terminal Adaptor | +| TE1 | ISDN data terminal | +| TE2 | DTE with a non-ISDN interface | +| UDI-TA | Unrestricted Digital Information with Tones and Announcements | + +# 5 Reference models + +According to clause 3/I.411, the Terminal Adaptor (TA) functional group lies between the R and S reference points and contains functions that allow a TE2 (non-ISDN) terminal to use the services provided by an ISDN. + +Clause 4/I.411 describes various physical configurations involving the TA functional group and the simplest one has interfaces at both the R and S reference points. However, other arrangements are possible and actual items of equipment containing the TA functional group may also contain other functional groups, resulting in the interface on the network side not being at the S reference point. + +In general though, for simplicity, the configuration with interfaces at the R and S reference points is used throughout this Recommendation. Also, for clarity, the expression "interface at the R (or S) reference point" is abbreviated to "R (or S) interface". + +Alternative arrangements on the network side are discussed in the subclause describing the network interface functions (5.1.4). + +## 5.1 Functional reference model + +The Functional Reference Model in Figure 1 is derived from Figure A.1/V.110. Figure 1 shows the main functional blocks that make up a terminal adaptor. These functions are described below. + +![Figure 1: Terminal adaptor functional reference model. The diagram shows a block diagram of a terminal adaptor. On the left, a box labeled 'TE2' is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'R'. This line connects to block (1). Block (1) is connected to blocks (2) and (3). Block (2) is connected to block (4). Block (3) is connected to block (4). Block (4) is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'S', which is then connected to an empty box. Below blocks (1) and (4) is a large box labeled (6). Two arrows point from box (6) up to blocks (1) and (4), with the text 'Connections to other functional blocks' above the arrows. Below box (6) is a dashed line labeled (7), with a vertical line connecting them. The text '(Note)' is below (7). The identifier 'T1400940-94/d01' is to the right of box (6).](35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg) + +Figure 1: Terminal adaptor functional reference model. The diagram shows a block diagram of a terminal adaptor. On the left, a box labeled 'TE2' is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'R'. This line connects to block (1). Block (1) is connected to blocks (2) and (3). Block (2) is connected to block (4). Block (3) is connected to block (4). Block (4) is connected to a vertical dashed line labeled 'S', which is then connected to an empty box. Below blocks (1) and (4) is a large box labeled (6). Two arrows point from box (6) up to blocks (1) and (4), with the text 'Connections to other functional blocks' above the arrows. Below box (6) is a dashed line labeled (7), with a vertical line connecting them. The text '(Note)' is below (7). The identifier 'T1400940-94/d01' is to the right of box (6). + +- NT Network termination +- TE2 Data terminal equipment (DTE) with a non-ISDN interface +- (1) Terminal interface functions +- (2) User (U) plane functions +- (3) Control (C) plane functions +- (4) Network interface functions +- (5) Synchronization between User and Control functions +- (6) Management and maintenance control +- (7) Local control and management interface + +NOTE – This interface is optional. It is needed if the TA cannot be adequately controlled from the R interface. + +FIGURE 1/V.130 + +### Terminal adaptor functional reference model + +### 5.1.1 Terminal interface functions + +This block provides physical layer functions at the R interface according to applicable Recommendations or International or National Standards. (These are listed in 8.1.) Alternatively this interface may be internal to a piece of equipment and therefore not subject to standardization. + +### 5.1.2 User (U) plane functions + +The main U plane function is the adaptation of the user's information signalling rate and format at the R interface to that of the ISDN B- or other channel(s) being used at the S interface. + +Additional U plane functions include: + +- end-to-end mapping of the states of R interface control signals; +- in-band notification/checking/negotiation of adaptation protocol (for multi-protocol TAs); +- in-band notification/checking/negotiation of adaptation protocol parameters; +- handling error conditions detected at the R interface; +- recovery of timing information (network independent clock); +- end-to-end flow control between TAs (methods are described in both Recommendations V.110 and V.120); +- multiplexing of several user connections into one ISDN call; +- aggregation of several ISDN calls to provide one user connection. Protocols for this purpose are described in Recommendation H.244 and the complementary International Standard, ISO/IEC 13871; +- detection and optional correction of errors that occur between the TAs; +- compression of the user information stream to increase the effective throughput; +- encryption of the user information stream for security purposes; +- modem function (see 10.3). + +NOTE – Recommendations may not yet exist to provide all the functions described above. + +### **5.1.3 Control (C) plane functions** + +The main C plane function is the mapping function needed to convert between the automatic calling and/or answering procedures used at the R interface and the ISDN D-channel signalling protocol. For R interfaces with little or no automatic calling and/or answering capability, the deficiency must be made up by a local management function. + +Additional C plane functions include: + +- out-of-band notification/checking/negotiation of adaptation protocol (for multi-protocol TAs); +- out-of-band notification/checking/negotiation of adaptation protocol parameters; +- security checking of incoming calls using the Calling Line Identification (CLI) supplementary service; +- identification of a particular TA on a shared ISDN access using, for example, the Multiple Subscriber Number (MSN) or Sub-addressing (SUB) supplementary services. The terminal selection process is discussed in detail in Recommendation I.333. + +### **5.1.4 Network interface functions** + +This block provides physical layer functions at the interface on the ISDN side. For the S interface, T interface or coincident S and T interface, these functions are specified in Recommendation I.430 or I.431. Alternatively this interface may be internal to a piece of equipment and therefore not subject to standardization, for example, the functions of TA and NT2 may be combined. Also, for connection to some ISDNs, provision of the NT1 function is the responsibility of the subscriber, not the network-provider. In this case the NT1 and TA functions may be combined into one piece of equipment, which is commonly called a “Terminal Adaptor”. + +### **5.1.5 Synchronization between User and Control plane functions** + +This block synchronizes signalling (in the C plane) with user information flow (in the U plane). An example is: + +- starting the rate adaptation protocol when the call has been connected. + +### 5.1.6 Management and maintenance control + +This block provides overall control of the TA and may in addition provide maintenance functions. Examples are: + +- storage of ISDN numbers for Calling Line Identification (CLI) checking of incoming calls; +- control of maintenance loops. + +### 5.1.7 Local control and management interface + +This optional interface is required if the TA cannot be adequately controlled from the R interface. An example is: + +- a keypad to provide manual call control; +- indicator lights or an alphanumeric display to show the status of the TA. + +## 5.2 Protocol reference model + +A terminal adaptor performs protocol conversion in both the control and user planes. The concept of planes is discussed in 2.2/I.320. + +### 5.2.1 Control plane + +The TA performs conversion in the control plane between the signalling procedures at the R and S interfaces. This requires a pair of protocol stacks linked by a signalling conversion function (Figure 2A). At the S interface all three protocol layers must be present (ISDN D-channel signalling protocol). The structure of the R-signalling layer varies from one R interface to another and will depend on the nature of the protocol at the R interface. The signalling conversion function provides a mapping between the primitive operations of the two signalling protocols. Examples of primitive operations are the commands to setup and clear a call. Auto-calling procedures are described in 6.1. + +For some R interfaces, it may not be possible to perform certain management functions via the R interface. This deficiency must be made up by a local management function. It may involve manual intervention, either at the time the operation takes place (e.g. to place a call) or at some time in advance (e.g. to store a called party number). + +Example of R-signalling layers: + +- For an X.25 interface it is X.25 layer 2 and the call control part of layer 3. +- For a V-Series interface one possibility is V.25 *bis*. + +The ISDN D-channel signalling protocol may also be used to carry out the additional functions described in 5.1.3. The ability to perform these functions depends on the availability of certain features in the ISDN to which the TA is attached. + +### 5.2.2 User plane + +The TA serves as a relay for user information between the R and S interfaces. This requires a pair of protocol stacks linked by a relay function (Figure 2B). At the S interface the adaptation protocol is used to allow the user's information to be carried in a B, D, H or other channel using an appropriate ISDN bearer service. If required, a higher bit-rate channel may be formed by aggregating two or more of these channels. + +The choice of adaptation protocol is determined by the combination of channel type and bearer service used over that channel. For example, V.110 is designed for use over the 64 kbit/s unrestricted (or restricted) circuit mode bearer service, carried in a B channel. V.120 is more flexible in its usage and can operate using an unrestricted (or restricted) circuit mode bearer service carried in a B or H channel or, alternatively, a frame mode bearer service carried in a B, H or D channel. + +The adaptation protocol may, in addition, support the functions described in 5.1.2. + +A particular TA implementation is not limited to the use of a single adaptation protocol. Choice of protocol can be by configuration or by negotiation on a call by call basis. Clause 9 describes such a Multi-protocol Terminal Adaptor (MTA). + +![Diagram of the Control (C) plane protocol reference model for a terminal adaptor. It shows a stack of three layers: 'Signalling conversion' at the top, 'R-signalling (Note)' in the middle, and 'R-physical' at the bottom. The 'R-signalling' layer is further divided into two sub-layers: 'Rec. Q.931' and 'Rec. Q.921'. The 'R-physical' layer is associated with 'Rec. I.430 or I.431 (D-channel)'. The stack is connected to an 'R' interface on the left and an 'S' interface on the right. A reference 'T1400950-94/d02' is noted near the S interface.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +| | | +|------------------------|------------------------------------| +| Signalling conversion | | +| R-signalling
(Note) | Rec. Q.931 | +| | Rec. Q.921 | +| R-physical | Rec. I.430 or I.431
(D-channel) | + +R +S + +T1400950-94/d02 + +Diagram of the Control (C) plane protocol reference model for a terminal adaptor. It shows a stack of three layers: 'Signalling conversion' at the top, 'R-signalling (Note)' in the middle, and 'R-physical' at the bottom. The 'R-signalling' layer is further divided into two sub-layers: 'Rec. Q.931' and 'Rec. Q.921'. The 'R-physical' layer is associated with 'Rec. I.430 or I.431 (D-channel)'. The stack is connected to an 'R' interface on the left and an 'S' interface on the right. A reference 'T1400950-94/d02' is noted near the S interface. + +NOTE – The structure of the R-signalling layer varies from one R interface to another. + +FIGURE 2A/V.130 + +#### **Terminal adaptor protocol reference model – Control (C) plane** + +![Diagram of the User (U) plane protocol reference model for a relay. It shows a stack of three layers: 'Relay' at the top, 'R-layer 2 (Note 1)' in the middle, and 'R-physical' at the bottom. The 'R-layer 2' layer is associated with 'Adaptation layer (Note 2)'. The 'R-physical' layer is associated with 'I.430 or I.431 (B-or other channel) (Note 3)'. The stack is connected to an 'R' interface on the left and an 'S' interface on the right. A reference 'T1400960-94/d03' is noted near the S interface.](d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg) + +| | | +|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| Relay | | +| R-layer 2
(Note 1) | Adaptation
layer
(Note 2) | +| R-physical | I.430 or I.431
(B-or other channel)
(Note 3) | + +R +S + +T1400960-94/d03 + +Diagram of the User (U) plane protocol reference model for a relay. It shows a stack of three layers: 'Relay' at the top, 'R-layer 2 (Note 1)' in the middle, and 'R-physical' at the bottom. The 'R-layer 2' layer is associated with 'Adaptation layer (Note 2)'. The 'R-physical' layer is associated with 'I.430 or I.431 (B-or other channel) (Note 3)'. The stack is connected to an 'R' interface on the left and an 'S' interface on the right. A reference 'T1400960-94/d03' is noted near the S interface. + +##### NOTES + +- 1 Layer 2 at the R interface may be null. +- 2 The structure of the Adaptation layer varies from one type of TA to another. +- 3 Any channel provided for user information may be used at the S interface. + +FIGURE 2B/V.130 + +#### **Terminal adaptor protocol reference model – User (U) plane** + +## 5.3 Interworking model + +The Interworking Model in Figure 3 shows possible interworking scenarios for a terminal adaptor. It is a simplified version of the diagram in Figure 1/I.515. The general requirements for successful interworking are: + +### 5.3.1 TE2 + TA to TE2 + TA (scenario a) + +The two TE2 + TA combinations must have a minimum common functionality for communication to be successful, for example both TAs must support the same rate adaptation protocol operating at the same bit rate. + +### 5.3.2 TE2 + TA to TE1 (scenario b) + +The TE1 must contain functionality such that it is compatible with the TE2 + TA. Thus, a TE1 which is ended to be able to interwork with an adapted TE2 will need to contain some of the functions described within this Recommendation. These functions are in addition to those required for communication between directly connected terminals (TE1 to TE1). + +### 5.3.3 TE2 + TA to non-ISDN network via IWF (scenario c) + +The requirements for the TA in this scenario depend very much on the type of non-ISDN network concerned and the functionality of the IWF. In many cases the IWF will need to contain some of the functions described in this Recommendation, for example, it may need to terminate the rate adaptation protocol used over the ISDN. It may also need a further adaptation function to the non-ISDN network. In the case of the GSTN this would be a modem. Alternatively, as described in clause 10, the modem function could be placed in the TA and the 3.1 kHz audio bearer service be used to interwork with the GSTN. + +### 5.3.4 TE1 to non-ISDN network via IWF (scenario d) + +In this scenario the TE1 must have equivalent functionality to the TE2 + TA in scenario (c). It will therefore need to contain some of the functions described in this Recommendation. + +![Diagram of the Interworking Model showing TE1, TE2, TA, IWF, and ISDN/Non-ISDN networks with interworking scenarios a, b, c, and d.](af6be343f0c0a8f155f965dcf337b8af_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the interworking model. It shows two rows of components. The top row consists of a box labeled 'TE1' connected by a solid line labeled 'S' to a central oval labeled 'ISDN (Note 2)'. This oval is connected by a solid line to a box labeled 'IWF', which is then connected by a solid line to a box labeled 'Non-ISDN network (Note 1)'. The bottom row consists of a box labeled 'TE2' connected by a solid line labeled 'R' to a box labeled 'TA', which is connected by a solid line labeled 'S' to the central 'ISDN (Note 2)' oval. The oval is connected by a solid line labeled 'S' to another box labeled 'TA', which is connected by a solid line labeled 'R' to a box labeled 'TE2'. Inside the 'ISDN (Note 2)' oval, four dashed lines represent interworking scenarios: 'a' connects the bottom-left 'TA' to the bottom-right 'TA'; 'b' connects the bottom-left 'TA' to the top-left 'TE1'; 'c' connects the bottom-right 'TA' to the top-left 'TE1'; and 'd' connects the top-left 'TE1' to the top-right 'IWF'. The reference 'T1400970-94/d04' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Diagram of the Interworking Model showing TE1, TE2, TA, IWF, and ISDN/Non-ISDN networks with interworking scenarios a, b, c, and d. + +TE1 ISDN data terminal +TE2 Data terminal equipment (DTE) with a non-ISDN interface +TA Terminal Adaptor +IWF Interworking Function + +Interworking scenarios: +a TE2 + TA to TE2 + TA +b TE2 + TA to TE1 +c TE2 + TA to non-ISDN network +d TE1 to non-ISDN network + +#### NOTES + +- 1 Examples of non-ISDN networks are Circuit and Packet Switched Public Data Networks and the GSTN. +- 2 For the purposes of this figure, NT1 and NT2 functions are considered to be within the ISDN. + +FIGURE 3/V.130 +Interworking model + +## 5.4 Call mapping model + +Because a TA can provide multiplexing or channel aggregation there is not always a one-to-one mapping between calls as seen by the TE2(s) and calls over the ISDN. + +In the diagrams below, each rectangle represents a call. Those above the dotted line (which represents the time dimension) are as seen at the TE2 side of the TA and those below the line, the ISDN side. + +In Figure 4 three cases are shown where the durations of the calls on both sides of the TA are the same. The first is for a simple TA where there is a 1:1 mapping between the calls at the TE2 and ISDN sides. An example is the V.110 TA described in Appendix I. + +The second is for a TA which multiplexes several (in this case three) TE2 calls into one ISDN call. An example would be a TA using the statistical multiplexing feature of Recommendation V.120. + +The third case is for a TA using channel aggregation to synthesize a 128 kbit/s channel out of two ISDN 64 kbit/s circuit mode calls. + +![Diagram illustrating call mapping for three different types of TA: 1:1 mapping, Multiplexing, and Channel aggregation.](ddc7460821484f1ae2835c67955c554c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates three call mapping scenarios between TE2 (R) and ISDN (S) over time. Each scenario is represented by a horizontal timeline with rectangles indicating call durations. + +- 1 : 1 mapping:** A single rectangle on the TE2 (R) side is connected by a horizontal arrow to a single rectangle on the ISDN (S) side, indicating a direct one-to-one mapping. +- Multiplexing:** Three rectangles on the TE2 (R) side are connected by a horizontal arrow to a single, longer rectangle on the ISDN (S) side, indicating that multiple TE2 calls are multiplexed into a single ISDN call. +- Channel aggregation:** Two rectangles on the ISDN (S) side are connected by a horizontal arrow to a single, longer rectangle on the TE2 (R) side, indicating that two ISDN calls are aggregated into a single TE2 call. The ISDN side rectangles are labeled with the reference T1401300-95/d05. + +Diagram illustrating call mapping for three different types of TA: 1:1 mapping, Multiplexing, and Channel aggregation. + +FIGURE 4/V.130 +Call mapping for three different types of TA + +Figure 5 illustrates a more complex situation. It shows a possible sequence of TE2 and ISDN calls for an X.25 DTE connected to an X.31 TA. When the first X.25 call request appears from the TE2 (on the left) an ISDN call is set up. As time proceeds (moving to the right) the first X.25 call is disconnected, but other calls have been set up and so the ISDN call remains in progress. Only when the last X.25 call has been disconnected can the ISDN call be cleared. The continuation of the ISDN call for a short time beyond the end of the last X.25 call is a timeout period to reduce the risk of clearing an ISDN call, only to find that another needs to be set up almost immediately. The duration of this timeout period is determined by performance and cost factors. + +# 6 Connection establishment (Call control) + +## 6.1 Auto-calling procedures + +In order to maximize the ease of use of a TA it is desirable that an existing TE2 (DTE) should be able to use an auto-calling procedure in the same way that it would when connected to a modem or a dedicated public data network (PSPDN or CSPDN). + +![Figure 5/V.130: Call mapping for an X.31 TA. The diagram shows a timeline with two main entities: TE2 (R) (X.25 DTE) and ISDN (S). TE2 (R) has three rectangular blocks representing calls, with the first block being the longest. ISDN (S) has a single, long rectangular block representing a call that spans the duration of the first TE2 (R) call. A horizontal arrow labeled 'Time' points to the right. The reference T1401310-95/d06 is at the bottom right.](4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg) + +Figure 5/V.130: Call mapping for an X.31 TA. The diagram shows a timeline with two main entities: TE2 (R) (X.25 DTE) and ISDN (S). TE2 (R) has three rectangular blocks representing calls, with the first block being the longest. ISDN (S) has a single, long rectangular block representing a call that spans the duration of the first TE2 (R) call. A horizontal arrow labeled 'Time' points to the right. The reference T1401310-95/d06 is at the bottom right. + +FIGURE 5/V.130 +Call mapping for an X.31 TA + +Mappings between auto-calling procedures at the R interface and the signalling protocol at the S interface are already described in the following Recommendations: + +- Recommendation X.30 (I.461): for X.21 based DTEs; +- Recommendation X.31 (I.462): for X.25 based DTEs; +- Recommendation V.110 (I.463): for DTEs supporting V.25 *bis* procedures (Appendix II/V.110). + +The V.25 *bis* procedures described in Appendix II/V.110 could be applied to other types of terminal adaptors for V-Series DTEs. Examples are TAs containing a modem function or using V.120 rate adaptation. + +Recommendation V.25 *ter* contains a description of alternative auto-calling procedures for asynchronous V-Series DTEs. The mapping of these on to the Q.931 signalling protocol is for further study. As well as containing call control commands, Recommendation V.25 *ter* also has commands for configuration and status monitoring. A proposal has been made to use a Management Information Base (MIB) to provide the mapping between V.25 *ter* and Q.931 primitive operations. An example of such a MIB (for V-Series DCEs) is to be found in Recommendation V.58. + +## 6.2 Multi-Use bearer service applications + +The Multi-Use bearer service is defined in Recommendation I.231.9. It provides a Bearer Capability (BC) of 64 kbit/s Unrestricted Digital Information with Tones and Announcements (UDI-TA). As a network option it can provide automatic fallback to the 3.1 kHz audio or speech BC to allow interworking with ISDN 3.1 kHz audio or speech terminals or terminals on the GSTN. + +A multi-protocol terminal adaptor (MTA – as described in clause 9) containing an adaptation function conforming to either Recommendation V.110 or V.120 and a MODEC function (see Appendix I) could use the Multi-Use bearer service with the fallback option to simplify the selection of its operating mode. + +The operation of terminals which use the “bearer capability selection option” of the Multi-Use bearer service is described in 3.3/I.501 and is summarized below. + +### 6.2.1 Outgoing calls + +For an outgoing call the MTA’s SETUP message contains UDI-TA (Unrestricted Digital Information with Tones and Announcements) as the preferred BC with 3.1 kHz as the fallback. Subsequent operation depends on any BC contained in the CONNECT message received from the ISDN: + +#### 6.2.1.1 BC = UDI-TA + +The TA operates in the 64 kbit/s unrestricted mode. Optionally, in-band procedures may then be used by the MTA to select a rate adaptation scheme, for example, V.110 or V.120. + +#### 6.2.1.2 BC = 3.1 kHz audio or no BC specified (possibly with GSTN interworking indicated) + +The TA operates in the 3.1 kHz audio mode. Optionally, the MODEM can then commence (in-band) modem identification procedures. + +### 6.2.2 Incoming calls + +For an incoming call the MTA's response depends on the BC(s) contained in the SETUP message: + +#### 6.2.2.1 BC = both UDI-TA and 3.1 kHz + +Providing the TA is otherwise compatible (e.g. the rate adaptation specified in the LLC information element is acceptable) then it responds with a CONNECT message containing the UDI-TA BC and operates in 64 kbit/s unrestricted mode. Otherwise it responds with the 3.1 kHz BC and operates in the 3.1 kHz audio (modem) mode. This allows 3.1 kHz (modem) interworking with other terminal adaptors which support the Multi-Use bearer service but use incompatible rate adaptation protocols in 64 kbit/s unrestricted mode. + +#### 6.2.2.2 BC = UDI-TA or 64 kbit/s unrestricted digital + +The TA responds with a CONNECT message containing the BC copied from the SETUP message and operates in the 64 kbit/s unrestricted mode. + +#### 6.2.2.3 BC = 3.1 kHz only (possibly with GSTN interworking indicated) + +The TA responds with a CONNECT message containing the BC copied from the SETUP message and operates in the 3.1 kHz audio (modem) mode. + +# 7 Rate adaptation protocol and parameter negotiation + +For many applications, both calling and called terminals can be preconfigured and no negotiation is required. Recommendation I.515 identifies a number of circumstances in which parameter exchange might be required. One of these is the selection of the rate adaptation protocol to be used. Further negotiation may then be required to select the values of parameters for a particular protocol. There are two possible ways of negotiating protocols and parameters. Out-of-band procedures using D channel signalling (Recommendation Q.931) can be used before and possibly after call establishment. In-band procedures can be used only once the call has been established. Figure 6 shows a taxonomy of the negotiation processes that can be used. + +![A hierarchical tree diagram showing the taxonomy of negotiation processes. The root splits into 'Predefined (no negotiation required)' and 'Negotiation required'. 'Negotiation required' splits into 'After call establishment' and 'Before call establishment (out-band only)'. 'After call establishment' splits into 'In-band' and 'Out-band'. 'In-band' further splits into 'Identification protocol' and 'Self-identification'. The identifier 'T1401320-95/d07' is located at the bottom right of the diagram area.](18722c46c9e8475524e634dedd08bac2_img.jpg) + +``` +graph TD + Root[ ] --- Predefined[Predefined +(no negotiation required)] + Root --- Negotiation[Negotiation required] + Negotiation --- After[After call +establishment] + Negotiation --- Before[Before call +establishment +(out-band only)] + After --- InBand[In-band] + After --- OutBand[Out-band] + InBand --- ID[Identification protocol] + InBand --- SelfID[Self-identification] +``` + +T1401320-95/d07 + +A hierarchical tree diagram showing the taxonomy of negotiation processes. The root splits into 'Predefined (no negotiation required)' and 'Negotiation required'. 'Negotiation required' splits into 'After call establishment' and 'Before call establishment (out-band only)'. 'After call establishment' splits into 'In-band' and 'Out-band'. 'In-band' further splits into 'Identification protocol' and 'Self-identification'. The identifier 'T1401320-95/d07' is located at the bottom right of the diagram area. + +FIGURE 6/V.130 +Ataxonomy of negotiation processes + + + +# 8 TE2 – TA interface considerations + +The interface at the R reference point between the TA and the TE2 functional blocks may be a physical interface or may be embedded within a piece of equipment. + +## 8.1 Physical interfaces + +Recommendations X.30, X.31, V.110 and V.120 describe TAs for terminals with interfaces conforming to V- and X-Series Recommendations at rates up to 56 kbit/s. However, the use in TAs of techniques such as data compression and channel aggregation will result in a need for interfaces at significantly higher bit rates. + +Applicable Recommendations and International Standards are: + +- Interchange circuits – Recommendation V.24, Recommendation X.24; +- Electrical characteristics – Recommendation V.10, Recommendation V.11, Recommendation V.12, Recommendation V.28; +- Interface connectors and pin assignments – ISO/IEC 2110. + +## 8.2 Flow control and buffering + +No flow control or buffering is needed for the simple situation in which two TE2s are connected using V.110 TAs and the bit rates of both TE2s are the same as that of the V.110 protocol. The same is true when Recommendation V.120 is used in a similar situation without error correction. + +In more complex circumstances the effective rate across the ISDN will not be the same as the bit rate of one or other of the TE2s. Possible circumstances are: + +- the TE2s (using V.110 or V.120 TAs) have different interface bit rates; +- Recommendation V.120 is being used with error correction and retransmissions are reducing the effective throughput; +- Recommendation V.120 is being used with a data compression protocol, e.g. V.42 *bis*, which is resulting in a variable effective throughput; +- Recommendation V.120 is being used with statistical multiplexing of a number of data streams. + +In such cases it is necessary to decouple the terminal from the ISDN by providing buffering and flow control. In the data compression and statistical multiplexing cases, it is desirable to operate the TE2 interface at a rate comparable to the maximum possible rate over the ISDN (subject to the terminal being able to accept this) and to use flow control to reduce the rate as necessary. End-to-end flow control between the TAs is a U-plane function (5.1.2). In addition, local flow control will be needed at the TE2-TA interface. Techniques for local flow control during asynchronous operation are described in 2.4.1/V.110. + +## 8.3 Embedded interfaces + +A common form of construction for an ISDN interface for some terminals is that of a plug-in printed circuit card. Depending on the nature of the interface between this card and the rest of the terminal the complete unit may form either a TE1 or a TE2 + TA. In particular, in some cases the interface behaves like the DTE interface of a modem although it does not necessarily have the same physical characteristics. In this case the card can reasonably be described as a TA. In other cases the card functions are much more closely integrated into the terminal and it is not reasonable to separate them, the whole terminal being described as a TE1. + +The T.200-Series Recommendations describe a “Programme communication interface for terminal equipment connected to ISDN”. This is a software interface between application software and the ISDN interface software and hardware. It is through this interface that the application transfers data and management information. This includes information required to control any terminal adaptation functions that are present. + +# 9 Multi-protocol terminal adaptor + +A Multi-Protocol Terminal Adaptor (MTA) supports more than one adaptation protocol in the user plane. The actual protocol used is chosen on a per call basis. Figure 7 shows such a TA which supports three different adaptation functions (shown as U plane functions 1, 2 and 3). These could be, for example, rate adaptation conforming to Recommendations V.110 and V.120 using the 64 kbit/s unrestricted BC, and a modem function (clause 10) using the 3.1 kHz audio BC. + +The selection of the appropriate U plane function could be made by the user or automatically during or immediately after call set-up. The following is a possible automatic procedure. + +If the type of network (ISDN or GSTN) to which the called terminal is attached is known, then the MTA can originate a call specifying the appropriate bearer service and, optionally, for the ISDN only, LLC and/or HLC information. + +If the type of network is unknown then the following procedure can be adopted: + +- 1) Originate the call with a 64 kbit/s bearer specified and, optionally, LLC and/or HLC information. If the destination is on the ISDN and the call succeeds then an in-band protocol (e.g. Appendix I/I.515) can be used to select a rate adaptation protocol. Otherwise proceed to step 2. +- 2) If the call cannot be completed because the called terminal was incompatible (i.e. on the GSTN or a 3.1 kHz terminal on the ISDN) then the call is reoriginated with a 3.1 kHz bearer specified. When the call has been connected then modem facility negotiation can proceed using, for example, the procedure specified in Recommendation V.8. + +The need to have to make a second call attempt in some cases is undesirable as it increases both the effective call set-up time and the signalling load on the network. + +A better approach (if the network supports it) is for the originating terminal to use the Multi-Use bearer service with the 3.1 kHz audio interworking option. This allows a single call set-up to be used (see 6.2). + +![Block diagram of a Multi-protocol terminal adaptor (MTA) showing its internal components and interfaces.](51db757d054ce1ce83c436a3578b56ca_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture of a Multi-protocol terminal adaptor (MTA). On the left, a 'V-Series DTE' box is connected to an 'R' interface, represented by a vertical dashed line. This interface leads into a large block labeled 'R interface function'. To the right of this block is a vertical stack of four functional blocks: 'U Plane function 1', 'U Plane function 2', 'U Plane function 3', and 'Call control function'. These are connected to an 'S interface function' block, which is further connected to an 'S' interface, also represented by a vertical dashed line. Below the main functional blocks is a 'Management and maintenance control' block. Two upward-pointing arrows connect this block to the 'R interface function' and 'S interface function' blocks, with the label 'Connections to other functional blocks' above the arrows. A dashed line extends downwards from the 'Management and maintenance control' block, labeled 'Local control and management interface (optional)'. The reference 'T1401330-95/d08' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Block diagram of a Multi-protocol terminal adaptor (MTA) showing its internal components and interfaces. + +FIGURE 7/V.130 +Multi-protocol terminal adaptor + +# 10 Adaptation to 3.1 kHz audio bearer (GSTN interworking) + +## 10.1 Introduction + +Recommendation I.530 identifies two alternative ways of providing data communications between ISDN and GSTN subscribers. + +- i) The DTE (TE2) of the ISDN subscriber is connected to a TA which rate adapts the information flow to 64 kbit/s according to, for example, Recommendation I.463 (V.110). At a suitable interworking point within the network, the original information flow is extracted and converted to an "analogue" form by a modem for transfer over the GSTN to the remote terminal (i.e. the usage of modem pools). This mechanism is described in Recommendation I.515. +- ii) The DTE (TE2) of the ISDN subscriber is connected to a modem which in turn is connected to a TA incorporating a codec. Interworking between the ISDN and GSTN is handled as for telephony. This second case, "Terminal Adaptor with CODEC", is shown in Figure 8. + +![Diagram showing the connection between a V-series DTE, a V-Series modem, and a Terminal Adaptor with CODEC. The V-series DTE is connected to the V-Series modem via a dashed line labeled (Note 1). The V-Series modem is connected to the Terminal Adaptor with CODEC via a dashed line labeled R (Note 2). The Terminal Adaptor with CODEC is connected to the GSTN via a dashed line labeled S. The diagram is labeled T1401340-95/d09.](10781f43062bf3e9601a1e086710556c_img.jpg) + +``` +graph LR; DTE[V-series DTE] -.->|"(Note 1)"| Modem[V-Series modem]; Modem -.->|"(Note 2) R"| TA[Terminal Adaptor with CODEC]; TA -.->|S| GSTN[ ]; +``` + +Diagram showing the connection between a V-series DTE, a V-Series modem, and a Terminal Adaptor with CODEC. The V-series DTE is connected to the V-Series modem via a dashed line labeled (Note 1). The V-Series modem is connected to the Terminal Adaptor with CODEC via a dashed line labeled R (Note 2). The Terminal Adaptor with CODEC is connected to the GSTN via a dashed line labeled S. The diagram is labeled T1401340-95/d09. + +###### NOTES + +- 1 This is the normal interface between a V-Series DTE and a Modem. +- 2 This R interface is the same as an interface between a modem and the GSTN. It is the subject of national standardization. + +FIGURE 8/V.130 + +### V-Series DTE connect to the ISDN via Modem and a TA with a CODEC + +## 10.2 Terminal adaptor with codec + +The "Terminal Adaptor with codec" can be described by reference to Figure 1 (Functional Reference Model). It has an R interface which is the same as that presented to a Modem by the GSTN. The "R interface functions" block (1) emulates the line card at a local exchange, performing such functions as power feeding, ringing current generation, hook switch and DTMF or pulse dialling detection and 2-4 wire conversion (hybrid). This interface is subject to national standardization. + +The "User plane functions" block (2) consists of a codec which conforms to Recommendation G.711. A-law or $\mu$ -law coding is chosen to suit national requirements. In addition this functional block is required to generate dial-tone in response to the off-hook condition being detected at the R interface. + +The "Control plane functions" block converts between the signalling at the R and S interfaces. This TA uses the 3.1 kHz audio bearer service. + +## 10.3 Combined modem and terminal adaptor + +A modem and a terminal adaptor can be combined into a single piece of equipment (Figure 9). This causes the R reference point to move to the interface with the DTE. The analogue interface between the modem function and the TA with codec function becomes internal and therefore not subject to standardization. It is then possible to remove from the TA and the modem the analogue line interface components that were associated with their being physically separate items of equipment. + +Figure 10 shows how the process of integrating a modem into a terminal adaptor can be taken a stage further by defining a new functional block, a modec (sometimes called a digital modem), which has no internal analogue functions and only digital interfaces. Interface (a) is the DTE's bit or character stream. Interface (b) is an octet stream which is the same as the PCM coding (according to Recommendation G.711) of the voiceband signal at the analogue (GSTN) interface of an equivalent modem. This TA uses the 3.1 kHz audio bearer service. + +![Figure 9: V-Series DTE connected to the ISDN via a combined Modem and TA. The diagram shows a V-Series DTE block on the left connected via a line to a large box labeled 'Combined modem and Terminal Adaptor'. Inside this box are two smaller blocks: 'V-Series modem function' and 'TA function with CODEC'. A dashed vertical line labeled 'R' marks the interface between the DTE and the combined unit. Another dashed vertical line labeled '(Note)' marks the internal interface between the modem function and the TA function. A third dashed vertical line labeled 'S' marks the interface on the right side of the combined unit. The reference T1401350-95/d10 is at the bottom right.](81a4cbf0b3c4cbc065efdf8f800dadde_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph LR + DTE[V-Series DTE] -- R --- CMTA[Combined modem and Terminal Adaptor] + subgraph CMTA + MF[V-Series modem function] -- "(Note)" --- TAF[TA function with CODEC] + end + TAF --- S + +``` + +Figure 9: V-Series DTE connected to the ISDN via a combined Modem and TA. The diagram shows a V-Series DTE block on the left connected via a line to a large box labeled 'Combined modem and Terminal Adaptor'. Inside this box are two smaller blocks: 'V-Series modem function' and 'TA function with CODEC'. A dashed vertical line labeled 'R' marks the interface between the DTE and the combined unit. Another dashed vertical line labeled '(Note)' marks the internal interface between the modem function and the TA function. A third dashed vertical line labeled 'S' marks the interface on the right side of the combined unit. The reference T1401350-95/d10 is at the bottom right. + +NOTE – This is an internal analogue interface and is not subject to standardization. + +FIGURE 9/V.130 + +### V-Series DTE connected to the ISDN via a combined Modem and TA + +![Figure 10: Functional model of a TA incorporating a MODEC. The diagram shows a V-Series DTE block on the left connected to an 'R interface function' block. This block is connected to a 'MODEC (Note)' block via interface 'a' and to a 'Call control function' block. The MODEC block and Call control function block are both connected to an 'S/T interface function' block on the right, with the MODEC connection labeled 'b'. Below these is a 'Management and Maintenance Control' block with arrows pointing up to the R interface, MODEC, and S/T interface blocks. A dashed line labeled 'Local control and management interface (optional)' connects to the Management block. Dashed vertical lines labeled 'R' and 'S' mark the external interfaces. The reference T1401360-95/d11 is at the bottom right.](e636d7ccca0ad14c6b95201404324823_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + DTE[V-Series DTE] -- R --- RIF[R interface function] + RIF -- a --- MODEC[MODEC (Note)] + RIF --- CCF[Call control function] + MODEC -- b --- STIF[S/T interface function] + CCF --- STIF + STIF --- S + MMC[Management and Maintenance Control] --> RIF + MMC --> MODEC + MMC --> STIF + LCMI[Local control and management interface (optional)] -.- MMC + +``` + +Figure 10: Functional model of a TA incorporating a MODEC. The diagram shows a V-Series DTE block on the left connected to an 'R interface function' block. This block is connected to a 'MODEC (Note)' block via interface 'a' and to a 'Call control function' block. The MODEC block and Call control function block are both connected to an 'S/T interface function' block on the right, with the MODEC connection labeled 'b'. Below these is a 'Management and Maintenance Control' block with arrows pointing up to the R interface, MODEC, and S/T interface blocks. A dashed line labeled 'Local control and management interface (optional)' connects to the Management block. Dashed vertical lines labeled 'R' and 'S' mark the external interfaces. The reference T1401360-95/d11 is at the bottom right. + +NOTE – A modec eliminates the analogue functions of a modem and a codec. + +FIGURE 10/V.130 + +### Functional model of a TA incorporating a MODEC + +# 11 Management + +For further study. + +# Appendix I + +## Protocol model for a V.110 TA (asynchronous mode) + +This appendix contains an example showing how the Protocol Reference Model (see 5.2) can be used. Figures I.1 and I.2, respectively, show the protocol models for the C and U planes of a TA intended to connect an asynchronous (start-stop) terminal to an ISDN Basic Access. It uses V.110 rate adaptation and V.25 *bis* or V.25 *ter* auto-calling. + +![Figure I.1/V.130: V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – Control (C) plane. The diagram shows a protocol stack for the Control plane. At the top is a box labeled 'Signalling conversion'. Below it are two columns of boxes. The left column contains 'Rec. V.25 bis or v.25 ter', 'Start-stop character format', and 'Rec. V.24, Rec. V.28'. The right column contains 'Rec. Q.931', 'Rec. Q.921', and 'I.430 D-channel'. The stack is connected to a horizontal line representing the interface. On the left side of the line is a dashed vertical line labeled 'R'. On the right side is a dashed vertical line labeled 'S' with the reference 'T1401030-94/d12' below it.](a24e89a6fe9bb70c83f8bf5202baba95_img.jpg) + +| Signalling conversion | | +|--------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| Rec. V.25 bis
or v.25 ter | Rec. Q.931 | +| Start-stop
character
format | Rec. Q.921 | +| Rec. V.24,
Rec. V.28 | I.430
D-channel | + +R + +S T1401030-94/d12 + +Figure I.1/V.130: V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – Control (C) plane. The diagram shows a protocol stack for the Control plane. At the top is a box labeled 'Signalling conversion'. Below it are two columns of boxes. The left column contains 'Rec. V.25 bis or v.25 ter', 'Start-stop character format', and 'Rec. V.24, Rec. V.28'. The right column contains 'Rec. Q.931', 'Rec. Q.921', and 'I.430 D-channel'. The stack is connected to a horizontal line representing the interface. On the left side of the line is a dashed vertical line labeled 'R'. On the right side is a dashed vertical line labeled 'S' with the reference 'T1401030-94/d12' below it. + +FIGURE I.1/V.130 + +### V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – Control (C) plane + +![Figure I.2/V.130: V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – User (U) plane. The diagram shows a protocol stack for the User plane. At the top is a box labeled 'Relay'. Below it are two columns of boxes. The left column contains 'Start-stop character format' and 'Rec. V.24, Rec. V.28'. The right column contains 'V.110 RA0 (V.14)', 'V.110 RA1', 'V.110 RA2', and 'I.430 B-channel'. The stack is connected to a horizontal line representing the interface. On the left side of the line is a dashed vertical line labeled 'R'. On the right side is a dashed vertical line labeled 'S' with the reference 'T1401370-95/d13' below it.](75e4b78ee25f885d73120e3066a5253e_img.jpg) + +| Relay | | +|-----------------------------------|---------------------| +| | V.110 RA0
(V.14) | +| | V.110 RA1 | +| Start-stop
character
format | V.110 RA2 | +| Rec. V.24,
Rec. V.28 | I.430
B-channel | + +R + +S T1401370-95/d13 + +Figure I.2/V.130: V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – User (U) plane. The diagram shows a protocol stack for the User plane. At the top is a box labeled 'Relay'. Below it are two columns of boxes. The left column contains 'Start-stop character format' and 'Rec. V.24, Rec. V.28'. The right column contains 'V.110 RA0 (V.14)', 'V.110 RA1', 'V.110 RA2', and 'I.430 B-channel'. The stack is connected to a horizontal line representing the interface. On the left side of the line is a dashed vertical line labeled 'R'. On the right side is a dashed vertical line labeled 'S' with the reference 'T1401370-95/d13' below it. + +FIGURE I.2/V.130 + +## V.110 Terminal adaptor protocol model – User (U) plane + +In the control plane (Figure I.1), on the terminal side, signalling is performed using the V.25 *bis* or V.25 *ter* protocol which is carried by an asynchronous (start-stop) character stream over a physical interface with V.24 signal definitions and V.28 electrical characteristics. The signalling conversion function maps between the V.25 *bis* or V.25 *ter* commands and responses and the Q.931 messages on the network side. + +In the user plane (Figure I.2), on the terminal side, the user's information is carried in the start-stop character format. This character stream is then subjected to the three stages of rate adaptation in the V.110 protocol stack. The RA0 function uses the method described in Recommendation V.14 to generate a synchronous bit stream. This is then subjected to first and second stage rate adaptation by the RA1 and RA2 functions to produce a 64 kbit/s stream that is carried over the ISDN B-channel. The process is reversed for the information stream received from the network. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.14-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.14-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f69261e3c412930f43030cd58c2a7bb0e21ca8a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.14-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.14 + +(03/93) + +**DATA COMMUNICATION OVER +THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +--- + +**TRANSMISSION OF START-STOP +CHARACTERS OVER SYNCHRONOUS +BEARER CHANNELS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation V.14** + +(Previously "CCITT Recommendation") + +--- + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +ITU-T Recommendation V.14 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XVII (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +# --- NOTES + +1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. + +In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Scope..... | 1 | +| | 1.3 Operation of DTE-DCE interface after failure to establish error-correcting (Recommendation V.42) operation ..... | 1 | +| 2 | Data signalling rates ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Signalling rate ranges of the start-stop characters at the converter input ..... | 1 | +| 4 | Start-stop character format ..... | 1 | +| 5 | Margin of the converter input..... | 2 | +| 6 | Selection of synchronous or asynchronous modes of operation ..... | 2 | +| 7 | Async-to-sync conversion method ..... | 2 | +| | 7.1 Transmitter..... | 2 | +| | 7.2 Receiver ..... | 2 | +| | 7.3 Break signal ..... | 3 | +| | 7.4 Tandem operation ..... | 3 | +| | 7.5 Testing facilities..... | 3 | +| | Annex A – Inclusion of an async-to-sync converter into a synchronous DCE ..... | 4 | + + + +# TRANSMISSION OF START-STOP CHARACTERS OVER SYNCHRONOUS BEARER CHANNELS + +*(Melbourne, 1988; revised Helsinki, 1993)* + +# **1 Scope** + +**1.1** This Recommendation describes a method of conveying start-stop characters over synchronous bearer channels using an async-to-sync converter in the data signalling rate range of up to 19 200 bit/s. Start-stop characters at signalling rates below or equal to 300 bit/s can be conveyed over synchronous bearer channels by oversampling at a signalling rate of at least 1200 bit/s. + +NOTE – The conversion method provided here replaces the conversion method applied earlier to Recommendations V.22, V.22 *bis*, V.26 *ter* and V.32. + +**1.2** This converter may be an intermediate device inserted into the data lines of both circuit 103 in the transmitter and circuit 104 in the receiver inside a synchronous DCE (see Figure A.1), or a stand-alone unit in certain applications. + +## **1.3 Operation of DTE-DCE interface after failure to establish error-correcting (Recommendation V.42) operation** + +DCEs may be designed to employ primarily the asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion associated with the error-correcting function specified in Recommendation V.42. Such DCEs are normally also capable of interworking, in a fallback mode, with DCEs employing the asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion in conformance with this Recommendation, but retaining the buffering of data and the flow control across the DTE-DCE interface. Further details may be found in 7.9/V.42. + +# **2 Data signalling rates** + +The conversion method shall be limited to signalling rates of up to 19 200 bit/s preferring the standard signalling rates of Recommendation V.5. + +The nominal signalling rates for both the start-stop characters and the synchronous DCE shall be the same. The tolerance of the signalling rate of the synchronous transmission shall be $\pm 0.01\%$ . + +# **3 Signalling rate ranges of the start-stop characters at the converter input** + +The conversion method is capable of tolerating the signalling rates of the DTE in two ranges: + +- a) basic range: +1% to –2.5%; +- b) extended range: +2.3% to –2.5%. + +The use of the basic signalling rate range is preferred since it results in lower distortion. The choice of range shall be made at the time of installation, and shall be the same for both transmitter and receiver. It is not intended to be under customer control. + +# **4 Start-stop character format** + +It shall be possible to condition the converter to accept the following formats; viz: + +- a) a one-unit start element, followed by seven data units, and a stop element of the unit in length (9-bit characters); +- b) a one-unit start element, followed by eight data units, and a stop element of one unit in length (10-bit characters); + +- c) a one-unit start element, followed by nine data units, and a stop element of one unit in length (11-bit characters); + +the converter may also accept characters consisting of: + +- d) a one-unit start element, followed by six data units, and a stop element of one unit in length (8-bit characters). + +Note that character formats c) and d) do not conform to International Alphabet No. 5. + +The character format selected shall be the same for both transmitter and receiver. The characters shall be in accordance with Recommendation V.4 regardless of whether they conform to International Alphabet No. 5. It shall be possible to transmit characters continuously or with any additional continuous stop element of arbitrary length between characters. + +NOTE – In each of the four formats, data units can be replaced by additional stop units. For example, format c) will allow 11-bit characters consisting of a one-unit start element, followed by eight data units and a stop element of two units to be handled. + +### 5 Margin of the converter input + +The effective net margin of the converter for transmitting of start-stop characters applied to the input of the converter shall be at least 40%. This figure is a subject for further study. + +### 6 Selection of synchronous or asynchronous modes of operation + +Selection for synchronous or asynchronous modes of operation shall be provided by switch (or similar means) enabling the user to perform normal transmission and testing in each mode of operation, respectively. + +In synchronous mode of operation the converter is totally bypassed in both directions. + +### 7 Async-to-sync conversion method + +The general method to handle the speed differences between the intracharacter signalling rate of the start-stop characters and the data signalling rate of the synchronous bearer channel will be the insertion/deletion of stop elements at the transmitter and reinsertion of deleted stop elements at the receiver. Means are provided to transfer continuous start polarity (break signals) as well. + +#### 7.1 Transmitter + +In the transmit direction the start-stop characters shall be adapted to the signalling rate of the synchronous bearer channel by: + +- deleting stop elements in case of overspeed of the start-stop characters; +- insertion of additional stop elements in case of underspeed of the start-stop characters. + +##### 7.1.1 Basic signalling rate range + +No more than one stop element shall be deleted for any eight consecutive characters. + +##### 7.1.2 Extended signalling rate range + +No more than one stop element shall be deleted for any four consecutive characters. + +#### 7.2 Receiver + +The intracharacter signalling rate provided by the converter shall be in the range of the nominal data rate to the limit of the specified overspeed tolerance, i.e. +1% in the basic and +2.3% in the extended data signalling range. The length of the stop element shall not be reduced by more than 12.5% for the basic signalling rate range (or 25% for the optional extended signalling rate range) to allow for overspeed in the transmitting terminal. The nominal length of the start and data elements for all characters shall be the same. + +2 Recommendation V.14 (03/93) + +NOTE – Equipments exists in the field which delete stop elements more frequently than specified in 7.1.1 and 7.1.2. However, in these equipments there will always be at least one additional inserted stop element between deleted stop elements. + +## **7.3 Break signal** + +### **7.3.1 Transmitter** + +If the converter detects $M$ to $2M + 3$ bits all of “start” polarity, where $M$ is the number of bits per character in the selected format, the converter shall transmit $2M + 3$ bits of “stop” polarity. If the converter detects more than $2M + 3$ bits all of “start” polarity the converter shall transmit all these bits as “start” polarity. + +NOTE – The converter must receive at least $2M$ bits of “stop” polarity after the “start” polarity break signal in order to ensure that it regains the character synchronism. + +### **7.3.2 Receiver** + +The $2M + 3$ or more bits of “start” polarity received from the transmitting modem shall be transferred to the output of the converter, and the character synchronism shall be regained from the following “stop” to “start” transition. + +NOTE – In some earlier implementations an uninitiated NUL character may precede the break signal at the output of the converter when no measures have been taken to prevent this. + +## **7.4 Tandem operation** + +Tandem operation between two ends comprising async-to-sync conversions can be established only by using cascaded synchronous bearer channels. + +## **7.5 Testing facilities** + +All the tests recommended in the relevant Recommendations can be performed in asynchronous operation as well, where this converter is used, with the exception of self test end-to-end. + +# Annex A + +## Inclusion of an async-to-sync converter into a synchronous DCE + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +![Block diagram of an async-to-sync converter within a synchronous DCE. A DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) is connected to a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) box. The DTE sends data 103 to the DCE and receives data 104 from the DCE. Inside the DCE box, there is an 'Async-to-sync converter' block. A switch labeled 'SY' (Synchronous mode) is connected to the converter. The converter has four data paths: 'TD' (Transmitted data) going to 'Sync, Signal converter, etc.', 'TDC' (Transmitter signal element timing) going to the converter, 'RDC' (Receiver signal element timing) going to the converter, and 'RD' (Received data) going to the converter. The DCE box is labeled 'T1400180-93/d01'.](d0abac95583b52a3b35f74a215567334_img.jpg) + +Block diagram of an async-to-sync converter within a synchronous DCE. A DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) is connected to a DCE (Data Communications Equipment) box. The DTE sends data 103 to the DCE and receives data 104 from the DCE. Inside the DCE box, there is an 'Async-to-sync converter' block. A switch labeled 'SY' (Synchronous mode) is connected to the converter. The converter has four data paths: 'TD' (Transmitted data) going to 'Sync, Signal converter, etc.', 'TDC' (Transmitter signal element timing) going to the converter, 'RDC' (Receiver signal element timing) going to the converter, and 'RD' (Received data) going to the converter. The DCE box is labeled 'T1400180-93/d01'. + +| | | +|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 103 | Transmitted data; data input to the DCE | +| TD | Transmitted data; the synchronous output of the converter following the async-to-sync conversion of start-stop characters to be transmitted | +| TDC | Transmitter signal element timing; internal timing information for the generation of synchronous transmitted data | +| RDC | Receiver signal element timing; internal timing information associated with synchronous received data | +| RD | Received data; the input of the converter for the restoration of start-stop characters | +| 104 | Received data; data output from the DCE | +| SY | Synchronous mode; selection of the required mode of operation (asynchronous or synchronous) | + +FIGURE A.1/V.14 + +NOTE – Other interchange circuits which are provided are not involved in the operation of the async-to-sync converter but must comply with the requirements of the relevant DCE Recommendations including the conditions of the timing circuits (i.e. 113, 114 and 115) during both the asynchronous modes of operation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.140-200501-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.140-200501-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f5f72d12fd6f65978a559e2f5a9085c23e1a82d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.140-200501-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1318 @@ + + +I n t e r n a t i o n a l   T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n   U n i o n + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.140 + +(01/2005) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interworking with other networks + +--- + +**Procedures for establishing communication +between two multiprotocol audiovisual +terminals using digital channels at a multiple of +64 or 56 kbit/s** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.140 + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# ITU-T Recommendation V.140 + +# Procedures for establishing communication between two multiprotocol audiovisual terminals using digital channels at a multiple of 64 or 56 kbit/s + +## Summary + +This Recommendation describes a standardized method for automatic mode negotiation, detection of bit alignment, and confirmation of subchannel connectivity for multimedia terminals on digital networks. This new protocol provides backward compatibility with existing standards and creates an extensible mechanism to negotiate future protocols. + +The two primary benefits from implementing this Recommendation are: + +- 1) improved reliability in completing calls and successfully establishing multimedia communications, since peculiar network characteristics (such as "restricted" networks) that interfere with call establishment and protocol negotiations are automatically handled by V.140 procedures; and +- 2) for terminals that support multiple communication modes, an automatic means of selecting modes. + +Principal features of this Recommendation include the ability to find bit alignment, detect remote network type, and perform in-band testing of channel characteristics; a flexible and extensible capability exchange and mode selection facility is also built-in. + +V.140 procedures apply to every channel of a multi-channel call and begin following establishment of the end-to-end digital connection, and before any multimedia or other communication protocols are initiated. The procedures are divided into three phases: + +- Phase 1 – Send/search for V.140 signature (note that V.8/V.8 *bis*, voice, and H.221 FAS, or any subset of these may be simultaneously transmitted). If such signature is detected, proceed to: +- Phase 2 – Characterize the digital connection (64 vs 56 kbit/s, detect octet/septet alignment), and diagnose any odd characteristics of the network, (i.e., it could be restricted, that is, it transfers only 7 of 8 bits to the far-end). Once this is complete, +- Phase 3 – Exchange mode capabilities (similar to V.8 *bis*) and select desired operation mode. Modes can include voice communications, multimedia communications, and channel aggregation protocols, but capabilities are kept simple, given that the purpose of this Recommendation is only to select a particular protocol, not to determine all of the parameters related to that protocol (which can typically be determined using the protocol itself). + +The Phase 1 procedures have been designed to allow simultaneously signalling of other protocols, such as H.320, to minimize the amount of time lost in beginning communications if a terminal that implements V.140 finds itself communicating with a terminal that does not. + +Following Phase 3, a terminal can immediately begin procedures associated with the selected operation mode. + +This revised version incorporates corrections to errors noted between the original approval in February 1998 until November 2004. In particular, the bit order illustrated in Figure 11 has been corrected to match the body text, and in Annex A incomplete ASN.1 syntax has been restored and references to multilink operation according to Annex F/H.324 have been added. + +###### Source + +ITU-T Recommendation V.140 was approved on 8 January 2005 by ITU-T Study Group 16 (2005-2008) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2005 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Introduction and scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 3 | +| 6 Overview ..... | 4 | +| 6.1 Phase 1 – V.140 signature transmission and acquisition..... | 4 | +| 6.2 Phase 2 – Channel characterization..... | 4 | +| 6.3 Phase 3 – Capability exchange and mode selection ..... | 5 | +| 6.4 Using V.140 to switch among multimedia operation modes ..... | 5 | +| 6.5 Interoperability with terminals that do not support V.140 ..... | 5 | +| 6.6 Interworking with PSDSNs ..... | 6 | +| 7 Network types..... | 6 | +| 8 Signals ..... | 7 | +| 8.1 Data stream model..... | 7 | +| 8.2 Phase 1 – V.140 signature block and compatible protocol field ..... | 8 | +| 8.3 Phase 2 – Alignment probing ..... | 12 | +| 8.4 Phase 3 signals..... | 15 | +| 8.5 Phase 3 HDLC framing ..... | 17 | +| 9 Procedures ..... | 19 | +| 9.1 Channel establishment..... | 19 | +| 9.2 Phase 1 – Signature transmission and acquisition..... | 20 | +| 9.3 Phase 2 – Determination of network characteristics and bit alignment ..... | 22 | +| 9.4 Phase 3 – Role arbitration, capability exchange, and mode selection..... | 26 | +| 9.5 Entering selected mode..... | 28 | +| 10 Resuming V.140 from a selected mode..... | 28 | +| Annex A – ASN.1 definition of Phase 3 PDU values..... | 29 | + + + +# ITU-T Recommendation V.140 + +## **Procedures for establishing communication between two multiprotocol audiovisual terminals using digital channels at a multiple of 64 or 56 kbit/s** + +# **1 Introduction and scope** + +This Recommendation defines automatic mode negotiation and selection for multiprotocol audiovisual terminals connected to digital networks such as the ISDN. The procedures in this Recommendation are intended to avoid interference with those of pre-existing Recommendations. + +The procedures in this Recommendation automatically determine network connectivity and bit alignment between terminals. Also, they enable prompt and accurate negotiation of a common mode of operation when one or both terminals support multiple protocols for audiovisual communication. For example, a terminal might support H.320, H.324 over voiceband modem, and H.323 over ISDN; in this case, the procedures in this Recommendation would be used to negotiate a common protocol, e.g., H.323. Once a mode is selected, further negotiations as recommended for that mode may use information derived from V.140 negotiations, if applicable. + +V.140 procedures can also be used to provide an optional initial voice telephony mode before proceeding to multimedia telephony, and to switch from one multimedia telephony mode to another, or back into voice telephony mode. + +The means by which digital channels are established between terminals are outside the scope of this Recommendation (see ITU-T Rec. H.200/AV.420). Information regarding the nature of the endpoint terminals available from D-channel signalling may be useful in further accelerating V.140 negotiations; use of such information is for further study. + +The procedures of this Recommendation concern only the flow of signals along the fixed digital paths used for the transport of audiovisual content during the call, at integer multiples of 64 kbit/s (or 56 kbit/s in certain networks). + +# **2 References** + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- ITU-T Recommendation G.711 (1988), *Pulse code modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies*. +- ITU-T Recommendation H.221 (2004), *Frame structure for a 64 to 1920 kbit/s channel in audiovisual teleservices*. +- ITU-T Recommendation H.242 (2004), *System for establishing communication between audiovisual terminals using digital channels up to 2 Mbit/s*. +- ITU-T Recommendation H.320 (2004), *Narrow-band visual telephone systems and terminal equipment*. +- ITU-T Recommendation H.324 (2002), *Terminal for low bit-rate multimedia communication*. + +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 (2000), *Procedures for starting sessions of data transmission over the public switched telephone network*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 bis (2000), *Procedures for the identification and selection of common modes of operation between data circuit-terminating equipments (DCEs) and between data terminal equipments (DTEs) over the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002, *Information technology – Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation*. +- ITU-T Recommendation X.691 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8825-2:2002, *Information technology – ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Packed Encoding Rules (PER)*. +- ISO/IEC 3309:1993, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – High-level data link control (HDLC) procedures – Frame structure*. +- ISO/IEC 13871:1995, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Private telecommunications networks – Digital channel aggregation*. + +# 3 Definitions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +- 3.1 56C interface:** A 56 kbit/s network interface which transfers all bits to the far-end. +- 3.2 64C interface:** A 64 kbit/s network interface which transfers all bits to the network. +- 3.3 64R interface:** A 64 kbit/s network interface which transfers 7 of each 8 bits to the far-end, for a net throughput of 56 kbit/s. +- 3.4 acquire:** To detect a signal a sufficient number of times to meet the specified acquisition criteria. +- 3.5 aligned channel:** A channel for which network byte timing is available to the terminal. Ordinarily, an aligned channel is needed to transport unframed G.711 voice telephony. Network interfaces which do not pass network byte timing, such as V.35 interfaces, cause the terminal to operate as if connected to a non-aligned channel. +- 3.6 byte:** A septet for networks with either a 56C or 64R interface. Also, an octet for networks with a 64C interface. +- 3.7 detect:** To receive a given signal a single time. +- 3.8 octet:** A group of 8 bits. For Phases 1 and 2, if on an aligned channel, each new octet begins at the time specified by network timing. +- 3.9 protocol data unit (PDU):** An HDLC frame carrying a Phase 3 message. +- 3.10 public switched data service network (PSDSN):** A 56 kbit/s public switched data service network, for example the "Switched-56" network in the United States as specified by TIA/EIA-596. Such a network may be sensitive to emulation of escape codes by data entering the network via a 64C interface. +- 3.11 restricted channel:** A channel carried on a network whose B-channels are effectively restricted to 56 kbit/s, or whose channels at $H_0$ or higher are restricted by ones-density considerations. This can be because the terminal is on a 56C interface or a 64R interface or because of the nature of the network. + +**3.12 round-trip:** Given two terminals, A and B, connected via an ISDN, a round-trip is the transmission via the ISDN of a message from terminal A to terminal B and then from terminal B to terminal A; it is generally assumed that the time required to process and otherwise manipulate the message is negligible compared to the time required for transmission and propagation. + +**3.13 reflected signature pattern (RSP):** A bit pattern transmitted during Phase 2 that is computed from the bit pattern in a particular subchannel as received from a remote terminal. RSP is transmitted in the same subchannel in which it is received to signal the alignment of subchannels received at the terminal. + +**3.14 septet:** A group of 7 bits. If on an aligned channel, each new septet begins at the time specified by network timing. + +**3.15 signature pattern (SP):** A bit pattern transmitted within an individual subchannel to signal the presence of V.140 support and to permit determination of subchannel alignment and continuity. + +**3.16 subchannel:** The bits in a particular bit position of a sequence of bytes. Bits within a byte are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, ... in order of decreasing significance. The number of the subchannel is the same as the number of the bit position. For example, the sequence of bits in bit position 4 in successive bytes form the bitstream corresponding to subchannel 4. + +**3.17 terminal:** Any of several types of endpoint devices connected to a digital network, including digital terminal equipment and Multipoint Control Units (MCUs). + +# 4 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|-------|----------------------------------------------| +| BC | Bearer Capability | +| CPF | Compatible Protocol Field | +| FCS | Frame Check Sequence | +| GSTN | General Switched Telephone Network | +| HLC | High-Level Capability | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| PCM | Pulse Code Modulation (per ITU-T Rec. G.711) | +| PDU | Protocol Data Unit | +| PSDSN | Public Switched Data Service Network | +| RSP | Reflected Signature Pattern | +| SP | Signature Pattern | +| UDI | Unrestricted Digital Information | + +# 5 Conventions + +The word "shall" is used in this Recommendation to specify a mandatory requirement. + +The word "should" is used in this Recommendation to specify a suggested, but not required, course of action. + +The word "may" is used in this Recommendation to specify an optional course of action, without expressing a preference. + +References in this Recommendation to specific ASN.1 message structures are presented in **this typeface**. + +# 6 Overview + +The procedures involve three phases: + +- Phase 1 – Send/search for V.140 signature (note that V.8/V.8 *bis*, voice, and H.221 FAS, or any subset of these may be simultaneously transmitted). If signature is detected, proceed to: +- Phase 2 – Characterize digital connection (64 vs 56 kbit/s, detect octet/septet alignment). +- Phase 3 – Exchange mode capabilities (similar to V.8 *bis*) and select desired operation mode. + +Once Phase 3 is complete, the selected mode (H.320, H.324, voice, etc.) is entered and normal call startup proceeds. + +Each phase should take little more than one round-trip time to complete, so the complete V.140 procedure should finish in little over 3½ round-trip times. Under typical circumstances (an intracontinental call via a 64 kbit/s clear interface), less than 1 second will be added to call startup. + +If no "signature" is detected, this indicates that the far-end does not support V.140. The terminal then falls back to any other non-V.140 protocol supported, such as H.320 (if H.221 FAS is detected) or V.8/V.8 *bis* GSTN modes (if V.8/V.8 *bis* is detected), or voice telephony. + +These procedures are designed so that terminals can transition from one phase of V.140 to the next at different times without ill effects: the timing of such transitions does not need to be precisely synchronized between terminals. + +## 6.1 Phase 1 – V.140 signature transmission and acquisition + +Phase 1 begins with the establishment of the end-to-end digital connection. + +A repeating 80-bit pattern containing the V.140 signature is transmitted. The purpose of the signature is to indicate to the far-end that this terminal implements V.140, and is capable of proceeding to the later phases. + +The signature has special characteristics. It is transmitted in the low-order bits of each byte to minimize the disruption of G.711 audio and permit simultaneous 48 kbit/s G.711 audio operation. + +These characteristics make it possible for the V.140 terminal to signal its signature while also sending GSTN modem tones and H.320 signals for compatibility with existing GSTN and H.320 ISDN terminals (see 6.5), as well as carrying normal speech telephony without startup delay. + +If the V.140 signature is detected in received data, this indicates that the far-end also supports V.140. The terminal then mutes received audio and enters Phase 2. + +If, after a time-out, the V.140 signature has not been found, the terminal may proceed to any other non-V.140 protocol it supports. If it was also searching for other protocols while looking for the V.140 signature, it may have already detected the far-end's ability to use these modes, and so has not lost any time starting these protocols. + +Otherwise, the terminal can continue the call as a voice telephone call, or can initiate another non-V.140 protocol. + +## 6.2 Phase 2 – Channel characterization + +There are a variety of national digital network types and interfaces in use. These include 64 and 56 kbit/s networks, and networks and interfaces which do or do not provide octet (or septet) timing. Even between two terminals with 64 kbit/s ISDN connections with network octet timing, it is possible on some national networks to have an intervening 56 kbit/s link. The nature of the end-to-end digital link, including rate and bit alignment, must be confirmed before the link can be used for multimedia communication. + +Upon entering Phase 2, each terminal probes the channel to determine the relative octet (if 64 kbit/s) or septet (if 56 kbit/s) alignment between the terminals. This is accomplished using Signature Patterns (SP) that are transmitted independently in each of the eight bit positions on the line. + +The bit position in which each SP appears at the receiver tells the receiver about relative alignment between transmitter and receiver. After the SP is detected, each receiver reflects its received SP back to the transmitter. Each terminal can then determine bit alignment and any network restriction for each direction of transmission. + +Once this procedure is complete, the terminals proceed to Phase 3. + +## **6.3 Phase 3 – Capability exchange and mode selection** + +In Phase 3, the two terminals exchange mode capabilities and select a mode. + +Using the entire 64 (or 56) kbit/s bandwidth, each terminal sends an HDLC-framed message containing a simple list of its capabilities (detailed capability exchange is left to the procedures of the selected mode). One terminal, normally the calling terminal, then selects a single mode from the list. + +The terminal which would ordinarily choose the mode can instead send a **youChoose** message to the far-end, requiring that the other end decide. This can be useful for situations where the calling terminal does not know the intended purpose of the call. + +Once Phase 3 is complete, the terminals go directly to the selected mode. + +## **6.4 Using V.140 to switch among multimedia operation modes** + +These procedures may be used to switch from one multimedia telephony mode to another, or back into voice telephony mode, by re-starting the Phase 3 procedures after termination of a previous mode. + +Also, Phase 1 V.140 procedures may be used in a "late-start" mode, after a period of G.711 voice telephony. + +## **6.5 Interoperability with terminals that do not support V.140** + +In order to support interoperability with existing terminals that do not support V.140, the Phase 1 V.140 signature has been designed to accommodate simultaneous signalling of other compatible protocols. The procedures given below specify how to use the facilities in V.140 to promote interoperability with particular protocols. + +A terminal that is attached to an aligned channel and supports G.711 audio: + +- shall transmit G.711 audio truncated to 6 bits during Phase 1 (see 8.2.1). + +A terminal that supports V.140 and H.320: + +- should transmit signals for H.320 operation as defined in ITU-T Rec. H.221 during Phase 1 of V.140 (see 8.2.1 and 8.2.2); +- should not respond to any signals defined by H.320 (i.e., should not complete Sequence A) until it fails to detect the V.140 Phase 1 signature from the far-end terminal. + +A terminal that supports GSTN modem operation (e.g., as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.34): + +- should transmit signals for GSTN modem operation as defined by V.8 or V.8 *bis* during Phase 1 of V.140 (see 8.2.2); +- should not respond to any signals defined by V.8 or V.8 *bis* until it fails to detect the V.140 Phase 1 signature from the far-end terminal. + +A terminal that supports ISO/IEC 13871: + +- should search for received signals as defined by ISO/IEC 13871 during Phase 1 of V.140 in order to determine if the far-end terminal supports ISO/IEC 13871 but does not support V.140; +- should not respond to any such signals until it fails to detect the V.140 Phase 1 signature from the far-end terminal. + +## 6.6 Interworking with PSDSNs + +Experience indicates that when a call is made from a 64 kbit/s ISDN to some Public Switched Data Service Networks (PSDSN), the low-order bit of each ISDN octet is transported without modification from the ISDN to the PSDSN. This bit is often used by PSDSN devices, such as Channel Service Units (CSUs), for in-band signalling of supervisory messages from the network to the CSU. Under some circumstances, bit values of zero in this position activate features of the CSU leading to loopback of the data stream, call termination, or entry of the CSU into a test mode. In the United States, the code values used for supervisory functions are standardized in TIA/EIA-596. + +The procedures given in this Recommendation have been designed to avoid emulation of PSDSN supervisory messages. In certain cases, particular octet values are either mandated or forbidden for this reason. + +# 7 Network types + +This Recommendation addresses terminals connected to the following types of digital network interfaces: + +- 64 kbit/s clear interfaces (64C) and restricted interfaces (64R) – variants of the same interface; +- 56 kbit/s clear interfaces (56C); +- $H_0$ interfaces ( $H_0$ ); +- $H_{11}$ interfaces ( $H_{11}$ ); +- $H_{12}$ interfaces ( $H_{12}$ ). + +A terminal cannot determine if a 64 kbit/s interface is 64C or 64R without using these procedures, since the clear or restricted characteristic is a result of a particular network route and may change from one call to the next. In effect, 64R and 64C are variants of the same interface. + +The terminal can be connected to only one of the five network types listed at any particular time. The terminal will know which of the five digital network interfaces it is using. + +In every case, the terminal implementing these procedures shall have direct access to and control of the network interface. For example, it is acceptable to use a digital terminal adapter as an interface to the network, but not a channel aggregation device based upon the protocol defined by ISO/IEC 13871 that does not also implement the procedures of this Recommendation. + +NOTE – The terminal may use these procedures to negotiate the subsequent use of ISO/IEC 13871 and other channel aggregation protocols, but the procedures of this Recommendation must be executed first of all. + +Each network type may or may not have byte-timing alignment from the network. + +The procedures of this Recommendation shall be used on each digital channel of every call, including digital voice-only calls, as said channel becomes available for use. + +64C interfaces transfer all bits to the far-end, at a rate of 64 kbit/s. + +64R interfaces locally interface at 64 kbit/s, but transfer 7 of each 8 bits to the far-end, for a net throughput of 56 kbit/s. One bit in each 8 is not transferred by the network. 64R interfaces are not specifically addressed in the procedures of Phase 1 because a terminal may not be aware whether it is connected to a 64C or 64R interface; however, the procedures of Phase 2 shall be used by terminals to identify which bit of the 8 is not being transferred to the far-end. Once terminals know which bit position in each octet is not being transferred, terminals shall ensure that valid data is never placed in said bit position, i.e., that bit shall be skipped. + +Terminals on 64R interfaces shall follow the procedures for 64C terminals, except that if a terminal has a priori information that it is on a 64R interface, and if it has network byte timing alignment, it shall fill subchannel 8 with binary ONES at all times, and otherwise follow the procedures for 56C interfaces. + +56C interfaces transfer all bits to the far-end, at a rate of 56 kbit/s. + +An $H_0$ , $H_{11}$ or $H_{12}$ channel may be regarded as consisting of a number of 64 kbit/s Time-Slots (TS), as defined and numbered in ITU-T Rec. H.221. The lowest-numbered of these TS shall be used by terminals to transmit the various signals described in this Recommendation; however, any terminal attempting to receive such signals shall search for them in any and all TS. The results of the procedures described in this Recommendation apply to all TS. + +The procedures to be followed for connections that consist of multiple 64 kbit/s B-channels interworking with an $H_0$ , $H_{11}$ or $H_{12}$ channel or multiple $H_0$ channels interworking with an $H_{11}$ or $H_{12}$ channel are for further study. + +# 8 Signals + +## 8.1 Data stream model + +All signals for Phases 1 and 2 are defined using a byte-oriented model of the data stream (as is used in ITU-T Rec. H.221). In the case of 64C interfaces, the data stream is modelled as a series of octets, whereas in the case of 56C interfaces, the data stream is modelled as a series of septets. + +Figure 1 illustrates subchannels within the byte-oriented data stream carrying example 8-bit values "1, 2, 3, 4, 5". 56C interfaces send only subchannels 1 through 7; this is illustrated through shading of subchannel 8 in Figure 1 and subsequent figures. All references in this Recommendation to transmission of information in subchannel 8 apply only to 64C interfaces. + +For each byte, subchannel 1 holds the most significant bit of G.711 audio samples in ISDN telephony, and is the first bit transmitted by the network. Subchannel 8 holds the least significant bit of G.711 audio samples, and is the last bit transmitted by the network. + +For signals carried within a single subchannel, bits are sent starting with the most significant bit of the signal; signals are shown in vertical columns (each column representing a subchannel) with the most significant bit at the top of the column. + +| Byte number | (MSB)
Subchannel 1 | Subchannel 2 | Subchannel 3 | Subchannel 4 | Subchannel 5 | Subchannel 6 | Subchannel 7 | (LSB)
Subchannel 8 | +|-------------|-----------------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------------| +| n | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +| n + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| n + 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| n + 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +| etc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | + +Figure 1/V.140 – Illustration of data stream model + +## 8.2 Phase 1 – V.140 signature block and compatible protocol field + +An 80-byte Phase 1 signal is repeatedly transmitted during Phase 1. There are two forms of the Phase 1 signal: one that shall be transmitted by terminals attached to aligned channels and another that shall be transmitted by terminals attached to non-aligned channels. The differences between the two forms of the Phase 1 signal are irrelevant to terminals that receive said signal. + +### 8.2.1 Terminals attached to aligned channels + +Terminals attached to aligned channels have some flexibility in determining certain characteristics of the signal to be transmitted during Phase 1. Within the Phase 1 signal, subchannels 1-6 shall carry PCM audio according to G.711, truncated to 6 bits, unless the terminal does not support G.711 audio. Any valid audio signal may be transmitted, including speech or GSTN modem signalling such as V.8 or V.8 *bis*. + +If the terminal does not support G.711 audio, subchannels 1-6 shall carry all binary ONES. + +Subchannel 7 shall carry a "signature block" consisting of 80 bits. Bits 1 through 16 shall contain a "Compatible Protocol Field" (CPF), which carries either all binary ONES or a compatible protocol. The CPF is followed by the 8 bit "Signature Pattern" (SP) field defined for that subchannel, i.e., SP-G (see 8.2.3), which is followed by a fill pattern of 8 bits set to binary ONE. SP is repeated four times in the subchannel, as is the fill pattern. The 16-bit CPF, combined with four repetitions each of the SP and the fill pattern complete the 80 bit signature block. V.140 signature blocks shall be transmitted in subchannel 7 only. + +Subchannel 8 shall also carry a block of 80 bits. Like subchannel 7, bits 1 through 16 shall contain a CPF. However, the remaining bits shall carry all binary ONES. + +NOTE – The CPF is primarily intended to carry H.221 FAS and BAS signalling. However, the provision of a CPF in both subchannels 7 and 8 does not imply that H.221 FAS and BAS (or some other compatible protocol) should be sent in both subchannels simultaneously. The CPF merely provides a reserved portion of the Phase 1 signal for the use of other protocols. Use of CPF by a compatible protocol should comply with the Recommendation for that protocol. Any portion of any CPF which is not used to transmit a compatible protocol should carry all binary ONES. + +In order to avoid emulation of PSDSN supervisory messages, terminals that transmit octets and are attached to aligned channels shall check each of the first 16 octets of the 80-octet Phase 1 signal to determine if that octet has one of the values listed in the column of Table 1 labelled "Forbidden" Value. If so, that octet shall not be transmitted; instead, it shall be replaced by the corresponding value in the column of Table 1 labelled "Safe" Replacement. All remaining octets of the 80-octet Phase 1 signal have the low-order bit set to binary ONE by definition and therefore cannot take on any of the "Forbidden" values. + +**Table 1/V.140 – Translation of byte values for "safe" transmission of audio** + +| "Forbidden" value | "Safe" replacement | +|-------------------|--------------------| +| 2A | 28 | +| 2E | 30 | +| AA | A8 | +| AC | A8 | +| AE | B0 | + +Subchannel 8 also carries a repeated 80-bit pattern which shall be aligned with the 80-bit pattern in subchannel 7. Bits 1 through 16 carry a CPF, like subchannel 7, but the remaining bits carry all binary ONES. + +The V.140 signature block is always 80 bits in length, regardless of the subchannel in which it is signalled. + +While transmitting the Phase 1 signal, terminals on aligned channels should concurrently transmit compatible protocols, such as H.221 framing, G.711 audio, and modem modulations within G.711 audio. Subchannels 7 and 8 are used because they occupy the least significant bit positions of G.711 audio, and so will be minimally disruptive of audio signals. + +![Diagram of the V.140 Phase 1 signal structure showing bit positions 1-8 across subchannels, with fields for G.711 audio, compatible protocol fields, and SP-G/All 1s patterns.](724c7777b608e53be38b12b6fb3c43bc_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the V.140 Phase 1 signal structure, organized by bit number (subchannel) from MSB (1) to LSB (8). The structure is divided into three main sections: + +- Bits 1-6: G.711 "safe" audio**: Occupies the top row of the first six subchannels. +- Bits 1-6: G.711 audio**: Occupies the bottom seven rows of the first six subchannels. +- Compatible protocol field**: Occupies the top row of subchannels 7 and 8 (shaded). +- SP-G and All 1s**: Subchannels 7 and 8 contain alternating SP-G and All 1s fields in the bottom seven rows. + +Annotations on the right side indicate the total size and repetition patterns: + +- 16 septets/octetes**: Points to the top row (Compatible protocol field). +- 4 repetitions of SP-x/ fill pattern**: Points to the bottom seven rows of subchannels 7 and 8. +- 64 septets/octetes total**: Points to the entire bottom seven rows of subchannels 7 and 8. + +A vertical arrow on the left indicates the total length of **80 septets or octets** for the first six subchannels. + +V.140\_F02 + +Diagram of the V.140 Phase 1 signal structure showing bit positions 1-8 across subchannels, with fields for G.711 audio, compatible protocol fields, and SP-G/All 1s patterns. + +**Figure 2/V.140 – Phase 1 signal for terminals attached to aligned channels +(shaded bit position not present on 56C interfaces)** + +### 8.2.2 Terminals attached to non-aligned channels + +Terminals attached to non-aligned channels transmit a somewhat different Phase 1 signal from the one just described; these terminals shall not transmit G.711 audio at all. + +If the terminal transmits octets, the first 16 it transmits shall be chosen from those in Table 2. This selection of values accommodates all possible choices for the CPF, which is carried in bits 1 through 16 of subchannels 7 and 8. If the terminals transmits septets, bits 1 through 16 in subchannels 1 through 6 shall be set to binary ONE. + +**Table 2/V.140 – Safe values for transmission during +the first 16 bytes of the Phase 1 signal** + +| | +|----| +| F8 | +| FD | +| FE | +| FF | + +After the first 16 octets, the following pattern of 16 octets is repeated 4 times (hexadecimal codes are given): + +DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00          FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF + +This pattern contains the SP fields assigned to subchannels 7 and 8 (SP-G and SP-H) embedded within it (see 8.2.3). Terminals sending septets should simply drop the least significant bit of each hexadecimal code. + +The V.140 signature block is always 80 bits in length, regardless of the subchannel in which it is signalled. + +While transmitting the Phase 1 signal, terminals should concurrently transmit compatible protocols such as H.221 framing by transmitting the codes in Table 2 during the first 16 bytes of the Phase 1 signal to set appropriate values in the CPF. + +![Diagram of Phase 1 signal structure for terminals attached to non-aligned channels. The diagram shows a sequence of 80 septets/octets (8 bytes) organized into 10 rows. Each row contains a 'Safe values' field (bits 1-6), a 'Compatible protocol field' (bits 7-8), and a 'Compatible protocol field' (bits 1-2). The 'Safe values' field is divided into two parts: 'Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H: DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00' (bits 1-4) and 'All 1s' (bits 5-6). The 'Compatible protocol field' is divided into two parts: 'SP-G' (bits 1-2) and 'SP-H' (bits 3-4). The 'Compatible protocol field' is shaded. Annotations indicate that the shaded bit position is not present on 56C interfaces, and that the total length is 80 septets/octets, with 4 repetitions of SP-x/ fill pattern and 64 septets/octets total.](8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg) + +| MSB | | Bit number (subchannel) | | | | LSB | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-------------------------|---|---|---|---------------------------|---------------------------| +| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +| Safe values | | | | | | Compatible protocol field | Compatible protocol field | +| Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H:
DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00 | | | | | | SP-G | SP-H | +| All 1s | | | | | | | | +| Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H:
DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00 | | | | | | SP-G | SP-H | +| All 1s | | | | | | | | +| Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H:
DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00 | | | | | | SP-G | SP-H | +| All 1s | | | | | | | | +| Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H:
DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00 | | | | | | SP-G | SP-H | +| All 1s | | | | | | | | + +80 septets or octets + +16 septets/octets + +4 repetitions of SP-x/ fill pattern + +64 septets/octets total + +V.140\_F03 + +Diagram of Phase 1 signal structure for terminals attached to non-aligned channels. The diagram shows a sequence of 80 septets/octets (8 bytes) organized into 10 rows. Each row contains a 'Safe values' field (bits 1-6), a 'Compatible protocol field' (bits 7-8), and a 'Compatible protocol field' (bits 1-2). The 'Safe values' field is divided into two parts: 'Special sequence (hex) incl. SP-G and SP-H: DD FF EE DD EE DD FF 00' (bits 1-4) and 'All 1s' (bits 5-6). The 'Compatible protocol field' is divided into two parts: 'SP-G' (bits 1-2) and 'SP-H' (bits 3-4). The 'Compatible protocol field' is shaded. Annotations indicate that the shaded bit position is not present on 56C interfaces, and that the total length is 80 septets/octets, with 4 repetitions of SP-x/ fill pattern and 64 septets/octets total. + +**Figure 3/V.140 – Phase 1 signal for terminals attached to non-aligned channels +(shaded bit position not present on 56C interfaces)** + +### 8.2.3 Signature Pattern (SP) field + +The "SP" field is 8 bits in length and contains a unique pattern which depends upon the subchannel in which it is being transmitted. + +SP is transmitted within individual subchannels to signal the presence of V.140 support and to permit determination of subchannel alignment and end-to-end connectivity. + +The 8 SP values are uniquely distinguishable from each other so that if subchannel alignment is lost in the network, the receiver can determine the transmitter's subchannel alignment by finding particular SP values in received subchannels. + +The SP values are given in Table 3, and their transmission in the data stream is illustrated in Figure 4. + +**Table 3/V.140 – Signature pattern values** + +| Subchannel number | Signature pattern name | Signature pattern value | +|-------------------|------------------------|-------------------------| +| 1 | SP-A | 10101100 | +| 2 | SP-B | 01011010 | +| 3 | SP-C | 10110110 | +| 4 | SP-D | 01101100 | +| 5 | SP-E | 11011010 | +| 6 | SP-F | 10110100 | +| 7 | SP-G | 01101010 | +| 8 | SP-H | 11010110 | + +| Byte number | Subchannel 1 | Subchannel 2 | Subchannel 3 | Subchannel 4 | Subchannel 5 | Subchannel 6 | Subchannel 7 | Subchannel 8 | +|-------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------| +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +| 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + +**Figure 4/V.140 – Transmission of SP values in data stream** + +Only SP-G and SP-H are used in Phase 1. All eight SP values are used in Phase 2. + +## 8.3 Phase 2 – Alignment probing + +During Phase 2, terminals alternately transmit two fields, Field A and Field B. No other signals shall be transmitted during this phase; audio and any compatible protocol shall be turned off. Each field is 8 bytes in length, and each field is composed only of contiguous bytes. The terminal shall commence transmission of the Phase 2 signal immediately after it completes its final transmission of the Phase 1 signal (see Figure 5). + +![Diagram illustrating the transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2 across 8 subchannels. The diagram shows two phases separated by a horizontal line. Phase 1 (top) has subchannels 1-5 as solid lines and 6-8 as dashed lines. Phase 2 (bottom) has subchannels 1-5 as dashed lines and 6-8 as solid lines. The labels 'Phase 1 signal' and 'Phase 2 signal' are centered in their respective sections. The top is labeled 'MSB' and 'Bit number (subchannel)' with bit numbers 1-8. The bottom is labeled 'LSB'. Wavy lines on the left and right indicate continuation.](9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg) + +MSB                      Bit number (subchannel)                      LSB + +1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8 + +Phase 1 signal + +Phase 2 signal + +V.140\_F05 + +Diagram illustrating the transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2 across 8 subchannels. The diagram shows two phases separated by a horizontal line. Phase 1 (top) has subchannels 1-5 as solid lines and 6-8 as dashed lines. Phase 2 (bottom) has subchannels 1-5 as dashed lines and 6-8 as solid lines. The labels 'Phase 1 signal' and 'Phase 2 signal' are centered in their respective sections. The top is labeled 'MSB' and 'Bit number (subchannel)' with bit numbers 1-8. The bottom is labeled 'LSB'. Wavy lines on the left and right indicate continuation. + +**Figure 5/V.140 – Transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2** + +Variation of the contents of Fields A and B during the subphases 2a, 2b, and 2c allow these fields to be used both as probing signals for a particular subphase and as acknowledgment of the far-end's most recent signal. + +Terminals on 56C interfaces shall transmit only subchannels 1 through 7 of Field A and Field B as presented in this clause. + +Phase 2 consists of three subphases: 2a, 2b, and 2c. + +### **8.3.1 Phase 2a – Initial values** + +In Phase 2a, Field A contains SP, as defined above, in all subchannels. + +NOTE – The values of SP are defined such that the last bit of the SP for every subchannel is set to binary ZERO. This feature can be used confirm where each SP begins in a subchannel. + +Field B contains all binary ONES in all subchannels. + +Figure 6 illustrates the Phase 2a signal, with Field A above the heavy line, and Field B below it. + +| Byte number | (MSB)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (LSB)
8 | +|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------| +| 1 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 2 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 3 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 4 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 5 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 6 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 7 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 8 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + +**Figure 6/V.140 – Phase 2a signal** + +### 8.3.2 Phase 2b – After SP acquisition + +A transmitter switches to Phase 2b after it has acquired SP from the received Field A; the procedure for doing so is described in 9.3.1.2. + +In Phase 2b, Field A contains SP, as defined above, in all subchannels (unchanged from Phase 2a). + +Field B contains "Reflected Signature Pattern" (RSP) as defined by the procedures for computing RSP in 9.3.2.1. + +The actual value of RSP in Field B depends on the relative alignment of byte timing between the two terminals and the treatment of subchannels in the network between them. + +The Phase 2b signal is illustrated in Figure 7. + +| Byte number | (MSB)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (LSB)
8 | +|-------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------| +| 1 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 2 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 3 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 4 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 5 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 6 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 7 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 8 | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| 9 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 10 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 11 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 12 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 13 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 14 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 15 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 16 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | + +**Figure 7/V.140 – Phase 2b signal** + +### 8.3.3 Phase 2c – After RSP acquisition + +A transmitter switches to Phase 2c after it has acquired RSP from the received Field B. + +In Phase 2c, Field A contains all binary ONES (as a signal that RSP has been acquired). + +Field B contains "Reflected Signature Pattern" (RSP) as defined by the procedures for computing RSP in 9.3.2.1 (unchanged from Phase 2b). + +The Phase 2c signal is illustrated in Figure 8. + +| Byte number | (MSB)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (LSB)
8 | +|-------------|-------------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|------------| +| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 9 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 10 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 11 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 12 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 13 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 14 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 15 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | +| 16 | RSP as calculated from received SP | | | | | | | | + +Figure 8/V.140 – Phase 2c signal + +## 8.4 Phase 3 signals + +Phase 3 signals are used to establish authority for mode selection, to exchange capabilities, to select a common operation mode from among the expressed capabilities, and to provide indications for abnormal termination of V.140. + +Phase 3 signals consist of HDLC-framed PDUs defined using ASN.1 syntax according to ITU-T Rec. X.680 and coded according to the packed encoding rules of ITU-T Rec. X.691. These PDUs are sent using the entire bit rate available on the channel. The actual PDUs are defined in Annex A. This clause describes the HDLC framing and semantics for each PDU. + +Phase 3 signals use a bit-oriented model of the channel. All bits of Phase 3 messages shall be transmitted bit-sequentially without regard to the interface type, and without regard to network byte timing alignment, with the following exception: if any bit positions within each byte of the channel are not being transferred to the far-end by the network (as determined by the Phase 2 procedures), the terminal shall insert a binary ONE at those bit positions so that they are skipped. The receiver of Phase 3 signals should perform the converse of the operations performed by the transmitter (see 9.3.4). + +During Phase 3, the following PDUs may be transmitted: + +- **roleAndCapability**; +- **youChoose**; +- **modeSelect**; +- **modeSelectAcknowledge**; +- **terminate**; +- **nonStandard**. + +The **nonStandard** PDU may be used to extend this set as needed. Although the meaning of non-standard messages is defined by individual organizations, equipment built by any manufacturer may signal any non-standard message, as long as the meaning of the message is known. + +Non-standard capabilities and modes may be issued using the **NonStandardParameter** structure. + +### 8.4.1 **roleAndCapability PDU** + +The **roleAndCapability** PDU transmitted by a terminal shall contain a declaration of the role taken by that terminal in establishing the network connection; a random value used for role arbitration when both terminals have taken the same role in establishing the network connection (e.g., for leased line connections); and a list of the capabilities for multimedia and other communication protocols available on that terminal. + +The **role** field of the **roleAndCapability** PDU takes one of three values: **answer**, **originate**, or **unknown**. The terminal shall assign the value of **originate** to the **role** field of any **roleAndCapability** PDU it transmits if the call was initiated at that terminal and the value of **answer** if the call was initiated at the other terminal. If the terminal lacks sufficient information to determine which end actually initiated the call, it shall assign the value of **unknown** to the **role** field. The value transmitted by the terminal in the **role** field shall be fixed for the duration of a network connection. The **arbitrationField** contains a 32-bit random number chosen using a random number generator with a uniform probability distribution. If a call consists of more than one digital channel, then the same **role** field and **arbitrationField** (random number) shall be selected and used in the Phase 3 procedures for all channels of that call. + +The **capabilitySet** field of the **roleAndCapability** PDU contains a sequence of one or more **Capability** structures, each expressing the terminal's ability to work in a particular multimedia or other communication protocol. The transmitter shall include the complete list of modes in which it is currently able to operate. The list of possible modes is defined in Annex A, and may be extended in the future. Capabilities shall be listed in order of preference, from most-preferred to least-preferred. + +NOTE – The terminal transmitting a **modeSelect** PDU is not required to take account of the order of preference of capabilities received from the far-end terminal, although it should do so. + +Some individual capabilities include additional sub-capability information. These indicate that the terminal is capable of using the stated sub-modes within the capability indicated. The far-end terminal may use this information to influence its choice of modes. + +### 8.4.2 **modeSelect PDU** + +The **modeSelect** PDU shall contain a single mode which has been selected from the far-end's **capabilitySet** as the mode of operation to follow completion of V.140 negotiation. The **modeSelect** PDU is structured differently than the **Capability** structure of the **roleAndCapability** PDU, since some individual modes include additional information. This information shall be used by the far-end terminal to set up the appropriate sub-mode as requested. + +### 8.4.3 youChoose PDU + +The **youChoose** PDU may be transmitted in place of the **modeSelect** PDU by a terminal which would otherwise choose the selected mode. It indicates that that terminal has deferred selection to the other terminal. + +### 8.4.4 modeSelectAcknowledge PDU + +The **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU indicates reception and acceptance of a **modeSelect** PDU. + +### 8.4.5 terminate PDU + +The **terminate** PDU indicates abnormal termination of V.140 negotiations. The **terminate** PDU includes a cause field and optional fields with values as required for a particular cause field. + +## 8.5 Phase 3 HDLC framing + +Messages shall use the frame structure shown in Figure 9. + +NOTE – HDLC framing used in V.140 is similar to that in ITU-T Rec. V.8 *bis*. + +![](19a59d6b53059ebd27b13c98793f88e0_img.jpg) + +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | +|--------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---------| +| Flag | | | | | | | | Octet 1 | +| Flag | | | | | | | | 2 | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | +| Information field | | | | | | | | | +| FCS (first octet) | | | | | | | | N – 2 | +| FCS (second octet) | | | | | | | | N – 1 | +| Flag | | | | | | | | N | + +Figure 9/V.140 – Phase 3 message structure + +### 8.5.1 Format convention + +The basic format convention used for messages is illustrated in Figure 10. Bits are grouped into octets. The bits of each octet are shown horizontally and are numbered from 1 to 8. Octets are displayed vertically and are numbered from 1 to N. + +The octets are transmitted in ascending numerical order. Within an octet, bit 1 is the first bit to be transmitted. + +For the two-octet Frame Check Sequence (FCS) field, bit 1 of the first octet is the MSB and bit 8 of the second octet is the LSB (Figure 11). + +![](b0e32f17c90ce1db73135488888ce558_img.jpg) + +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---------| +| | | | | | | | | Octet 1 | +| | | | | | | | | 2 | +| | | | | | | | | ... | +| | | | | | | | | N | + +Figure 10/V.140 – Format convention + +| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | +|----------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|-----------------|--------------------| +| 2 8 | | | | | | | 2 15 | 1st octet of field | +| 2 0 | | | | | | | 2 7 | 2nd octet of field | + +**Figure 11/V.140 – FCS mapping convention** + +### 8.5.2 Flag sequence + +Messages shall start and end with the standard HDLC flag octet (01111110) as defined in ISO/IEC 3309. Two flags shall be sent to begin each message (the use of two increases error resilience). One flag shall follow the FCS of each message. As a result, there shall be three flags between consecutive messages. + +### 8.5.3 Distinguishing sequence + +Following the sequence of two flag octets at the beginning of the message and preceding the information field, there shall be a four-octet sequence with the hexadecimal values 73 62 61 64. This sequence serves to distinguish this PDU format from others that use a similar HDLC framing structure. + +### 8.5.4 Information field + +The contents of the information field shall consist of an integral number of octets containing a single PDU structured in accordance with Annex A. PDUs shall be encoded from the ASN.1 by applying the packed encoding rules specified in ITU-T Rec. X.691 using the basic aligned variant. The bit string that results from the ASN.1 encoding shall be placed in the octet string in the information field in the order such that for each octet, the leading bit is placed in bit 1 and the trailing bit is placed in bit 8. + +### 8.5.5 Frame check sequence field + +The FCS field is 16 bits (2 octets) in length. As defined in ISO/IEC 3309, it shall be the one's complement of the sum (modulo 2) of: + +- the remainder of $x^k (x^{15} + x^{14} + x^{13} + x^{12} + x^{11} + x^{10} + x^9 + x^8 + x^7 + x^6 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1)$ divided (modulo 2) by the generator polynomial $x^{16} + x^{12} + x^5 + 1$ , where *k* is the number of bits in the frame existing between, but not including, the last bit of the final opening flag and the first bit of the FCS, excluding bits (binary **ZEROs**) inserted for transparency; and +- the remainder of the division (modulo 2) by the generator polynomial $x^{16} + x^{12} + x^5 + 1$ , of the product of $x^{16}$ by the content of the frame existing between, but not including, the last bit of the final opening flag and the first bit of the FCS, excluding bits inserted for transparency. + +As a typical implementation at the transmitter, the initial content of the register of the device computing the remainder of the division is preset to all binary **ONES** and is then modified by division by the generator polynomial (as described above) on the information field. The one's complement of the resulting remainder is transmitted as the 16-bit FCS. + +As a typical implementation at the receiver, the initial content of the register of the device computing the remainder of the division is preset to all binary **ONES**. The final remainder, after multiplication by $x^{16}$ and then division (modulo 2) by the generator polynomial $x^{16} + x^{12} + x^5 + 1$ of the serial incoming protected bits and the FCS, will be 0001110100001111 ( $x^{15}$ through $x^0$ , respectively) in the absence of transmission errors. + +### 8.5.6 Transparency + +The transmitting terminal shall examine the contents of the information and FCS fields (everything between the opening and closing flags) and insert a binary **ZERO** after every sequence of five contiguous binary **ONES** to ensure that the flag octet is not simulated within the frame. The receiving + +terminal shall examine the contents of the frame between the opening and closing flags and discard any binary ZERO which directly follows five contiguous binary ONES. + +# 9 Procedures + +The general sequence of signal exchanges required for completion of the procedures in this Recommendation is shown in Figure 12. + +![Figure 12/V.140 – 'Ladder' diagram of the sequence of signals and phases of V.140. The diagram shows a vertical timeline with a central vertical line. To the left of the line are 'Signals transmitted' and to the right are 'Signals received'. The sequence is as follows: 1. Phase 1: H.247 signature is transmitted. 2. Phase 2a: SP-G or SP-H is received. 3. Phase 2b: Field A = SP is transmitted, and Field B = RSP is received. 4. Phase 2c: Field A = 1 s and Field B = RSP are transmitted. 5. Phase 3: Field A = 1 s or HDLC Flags are received, and V.140_F12 is transmitted.](26d664119ad25250780f554633444e54_img.jpg) + +Figure 12/V.140 – 'Ladder' diagram of the sequence of signals and phases of V.140. The diagram shows a vertical timeline with a central vertical line. To the left of the line are 'Signals transmitted' and to the right are 'Signals received'. The sequence is as follows: 1. Phase 1: H.247 signature is transmitted. 2. Phase 2a: SP-G or SP-H is received. 3. Phase 2b: Field A = SP is transmitted, and Field B = RSP is received. 4. Phase 2c: Field A = 1 s and Field B = RSP are transmitted. 5. Phase 3: Field A = 1 s or HDLC Flags are received, and V.140\_F12 is transmitted. + +**Figure 12/V.140 – "Ladder" diagram of the sequence of signals and phases of V.140** + +All signals shall be transmitted repeatedly until acknowledged. Whenever one signal is changed to another, for example when moving from one phase or sub-phase to the next, the change shall only take place at an allowed boundary as defined for the signal prior to the change. The allowed boundaries are as follows: + +- Phase 1: the completion of the 80 byte Phase 1 signal. +- Phase 2: the completion of Field B. +- Phase 3: the completion of an HDLC frame. + +## 9.1 Channel establishment + +The end-to-end digital connection shall be established according to the procedures appropriate for the network in use, according to national standards. + +### 9.1.1 Interactions with ISDN D-channel signalling + +Terminals originating calls on the ISDN shall signal the ISDN Bearer Capabilities (BC) and High Level Capabilities (HLC) according to either the row marked "Attempt 1" or the row marked "Attempt 2" in Table 5. If the call is rejected by the network and the indicated Cause, as defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.850, is one of those listed in Table 4, the originating terminal shall automatically re-try the call attempt using different values of BC and HLC according to Table 5. Since this procedure incorporates a call re-try mechanism, terminals shall not use the bearer capability selection option. + +NOTE – The bearer capability selection option allows a calling terminal to encode two bearer capabilities in a setup message, such that the alternative bearer capability is automatically invoked in case the preferred bearer capability is unavailable or if interworking (e.g., to the PSTN) is encountered (see ITU-T Rec. Q.931). + +Originating terminals shall continue call attempts according to Table 5 until the BC value is no longer compatible with any desired mode of operation, or until reaching the end of the table. + +Terminals initiating a call on the ISDN should eliminate protocols from the Phase 3 capability set that are not appropriate given the BC and HLC signalled for the call. Similarly, answering terminals should disable all locally supported protocols inappropriate for the received values of BC and HLC, and should remove those protocols from the Phase 3 capability set. + +**Table 4/V.140 – List of causes that may indicate an incompatible BC +(see ITU-T Rec. Q.931)** + +| Cause No.
(from ITU-T Rec. Q.850)
| Cause name
(from ITU-T Rec. Q.850)
| +|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 18 | No user responding | +| 57 | Bearer capability not authorized | +| 58 | Bearer capability not presently available | +| 63 | Service or option not available, unspecified | +| 65 | Bearer service not implemented | +| 88 | Incompatible destination | + +**Table 5/V.140 – BC and HLC values for ISDN calls** + +| | BC (Information transfer capability) | HLC value | +|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| Attempt 1 | Unrestricted digital information with tones/announcements | None, or per national standards | +| Attempt 2 | Unrestricted Digital Information (UDI) | None, or per national standards | +| Attempt 3 | UDI, rate adapted to 56 kbit/s | None, or per national standards | +| Attempt 4 | 3.1 kHz audio | None, or per national standards | +| Attempt 5 | Speech | None, or per national standards | + +## 9.2 Phase 1 – Signature transmission and acquisition + +If the procedures of V.140 are in use, an optional period of G.711 voice telephony may begin when the called party answers. In this mode, users have the opportunity to speak with one another before proceeding to multimedia telephony. During this period, the terminal shall continuously search for a Phase 1 signature from the far-end terminal. + +If the terminal is conditioned to go directly into digital communication mode, this optional period shall be bypassed, and the terminal shall proceed directly to Phase 1 immediately upon end-to-end network connection of the digital channel. If the terminal is conditioned for initial G.711 voice telephony mode, the terminal shall proceed to Phase 1 when either of the following conditions is met: + +- the user manually causes the terminal to initiate transmission of the Phase 1 signature; or +- the terminal detects a Phase 1 signature from the far-end terminal. + +### 9.2.1 Transmitter procedure + +In Phase 1, terminals shall repeatedly transmit the appropriate Phase 1 signal. The Phase 1 signal to be transmitted by a terminal attached to an aligned channel is described in 8.2.1. A somewhat different Phase 1 signal is to be transmitted by a terminal attached to a non-aligned channel, and is described in 8.2.2. + +In either case, the CPF field shall carry a compatible protocol or bits set to binary ONE. Such compatible protocol signals may be sent in order that far-end terminals of these types which do not support these procedures may initiate their negotiation. + +### 9.2.2 Receiver procedure + +The receiver shall search all received subchannels in the received Phase 1 signal, i.e., subchannels 1 to 8, for SP-G and SP-H. Presence of either of these signals indicates that the far-end supports V.140. + +The terminal may carry out any procedures (i.e., related to another protocol) during Phase 1 of V.140 that do not interfere with any phase of V.140. For example, while searching for SP, the receiver may search for signals conforming to any other protocols supported locally. However, the terminal shall proceed with another protocol only: + +- 1) if and when it is established that the far-end does not support V.140, as defined in 9.2.2.1; or +- 2) after selection of that protocol by the Phase 3 procedure. + +In addition, if the receiver is on an aligned channel, bits 1-6 of each byte may be decoded as audio according to ITU-T Rec. G.711 and delivered to the user while executing this procedure, so that voice telephony is established immediately upon connection of the circuit, if the far-end terminal supports voice telephony. + +If the receiver decodes G.711 audio, it shall automatically determine the proper G.711 law of the incoming audio, for example by using the procedures of Appendix I/G.725. Note that the G.711 law is allowed to be different in each direction. + +Terminals attached to non-aligned channels need not search for G.711 audio or modem tones (as defined in V.8 and V.8 *bis*, since such terminals cannot decode or otherwise use audio signals without a framing pattern (e.g., provided by ITU-T Rec. H.221). + +#### 9.2.2.1 Signature pattern (SP) acquisition criteria and time-out + +To acquire an SP (either SP-G or SP-H), the terminal shall attempt to detect, within any single subchannel, all four occurrences of that SP properly positioned within 3 contiguously received 80-bit Phase 1 signals. If the attempt is successful, the terminal shall enter Phase 2a. + +Since SP is included in the Phase 2a signal, the signature can still be acquired from a far-end terminal which has already entered Phase 2a. + +If SP acquisition does not occur within 2 to 8 seconds of connection of the digital channel, the receiver shall interpret this as an indication that the far-end terminal does not support V.140, and shall terminate V.140 procedures. The local terminal may then optionally disconnect the channel, or may optionally proceed with any other protocol supported by the terminal, such as voice telephony, H.320, HDLC-based protocols, or GSTN modem signalling such as V.8 or V.8 *bis*. + +NOTE 1 – There is a small probability ( $\sim 2^{-128}$ ) that a completely random signal could emulate the signature within the Phase 1 signal. This probability may be slightly higher if the signal is not completely random, i.e., if it is made up of G.711 audio or V.8/V.8 *bis* modem signals. + +NOTE 2 – Terminals that allow periods approaching the upper limit of the above range (i.e., 8 seconds) to elapse before terminating V.140 procedures can encounter interoperability problems when interworking with terminals that do not implement V.140 procedures because other protocols such as H.320 and ISO/IEC 13871 may time out. + +## 9.3 Phase 2 – Determination of network characteristics and bit alignment + +Upon entry to Phase 2, the terminal shall disconnect the output of the audio decoder from any sound output devices and cease transmitting audio and all other protocols. + +Phase 2 signals shall begin with Field A immediately following the final Phase 1 signal. Field A and Field B shall be transmitted alternately throughout Phase 2. + +Terminals on 56C interfaces shall transmit only bits 1 through 7 of Field A and Field B. + +### 9.3.1 Phase 2a – Transmitting and acquiring SP in each subchannel + +#### 9.3.1.1 Transmitter procedure + +The transmitter shall repeatedly transmit the Phase 2a signal. + +This signal serves to acknowledge the acquisition of the far-end's Phase 1 signal and to transmit a unique SP in each subchannel, with SP-A in subchannel 1, SP-B in subchannel 2, SP-C in subchannel 3, SP-D in subchannel 4, SP-E in subchannel 5, SP-F in subchannel 6, and continuing to transmit SP-G and SP-H in subchannels 7 and 8, respectively, in case the far-end has not yet proceeded to Phase 2a. + +#### 9.3.1.2 Receiver procedure + +In Phase 2a, the receiver shall search all received subchannels for any of the eight values of SP and the "all binary ONES" pattern. Since the subchannel alignment between the transmitter and receiver may be different, transmitted SP patterns may appear in different subchannel positions at the receiver. + +Moreover, if the receiver detects the "all binary ONES" pattern in one subchannel and correct values of SP in at least four other subchannels, it is possible that one of the bytes in the 8-byte sequence that comprises the transmitted SP patterns has been corrupted by network equipment: every bit in that byte will be a binary ONE (see Figure 13 for an example). The terminal shall determine if this is the case by checking, as follows, the subchannels that contain neither SP nor all binary ONES: + +- if these subchannels contain a pattern similar to SP except for a single replacement of binary ZERO with binary ONE; and +- if the replacement occurs in the same bit position for all such subchannels, + +then the terminal shall consider all eight values of SP to have been detected correctly if and only if all subsequently received SPs are corrupted in the same fashion. + +| Byte number | Subchannel 1 | Subchannel 2 | Subchannel 3 | Subchannel 4 | Subchannel 5 | Subchannel 6 | Subchannel 7 | Subchannel 8 | +|-------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------| +| x | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| x + 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| x + 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +| x + 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| x + 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| x + 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| x + 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| x + 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | + +**Figure 13/V.140 – Example of corruption of SP values by network equipment: +Subchannel 7 is all ONES and byte (x + 6) is corrupted, also all ONES** + +For each subchannel, SP shall be considered to have been acquired when it is detected in four consecutive Field A positions. + +For each subchannel, the all-binary-ONEs pattern shall be considered to have been acquired when it is detected in four consecutive Field A positions. + +If SP is not acquired in at least 7 subchannels within two seconds of entry into Phase 2a, the V.140 procedures shall terminate. + +The receiver shall stop searching for additional SP or all-binary-ONEs patterns in subchannels when any one of the following conditions is satisfied: + +- SPs have been acquired in all subchannels; or +- after 20 Field A positions beyond the point at which the seventh SP pattern was acquired, given that the eighth SP has been replaced by a pattern of all binary ONEs. + +Subchannels on which SP was not acquired shall be considered to be unusable in the direction toward the local terminal. The terminal shall then determine the subchannel numbering of the transmitting terminal and determine which subchannel, if any, is not transmitted or not passed through the network by examining Field A. It shall then proceed to Phase 2b. + +NOTE 1 – The difference between the number of a subchannel and the number of the SP (SP-A = 1, SP-B = 2, etc.) acquired in that subchannel indicates the number of bit positions that the bytes transmitted by the far-end terminal are rotated, i.e., if SP-E is received in subchannel 1, the transmitted signal is rotated 4 bit positions to the left. + +NOTE 2 – If a terminal acquires a pattern of all binary ONEs in any subchannel, that subchannel is not being transmitted by or passed through the network from the far-end terminal. + +### **9.3.2 Phase 2b – Reflected SP and alignment recovery** + +#### **9.3.2.1 Transmitter procedure** + +The transmitter shall repeatedly transmit the Phase 2b signal. + +This signal serves to acknowledge the acquisition of SP and to transmit a "Reflected Signature Pattern" (RSP) in each subchannel in Field B, while continuing to transmit SP in all subchannels in Field A, in case the far-end has not yet proceeded to Phase 2b. + +The value of the RSP for each subchannel is computed from the received Field A on the same subchannel. + +RSP shall be computed for each subchannel as follows: + +- 1) If SP was acquired on the received subchannel $n$ (where $n$ takes the values 1 to 8), subchannel $n$ of transmitted Field B shall contain the one's complement of the first 7 bits of the SP (the correct SP as defined in Table 3 shall be sent even if a corrupted version was received) followed by a binary ZERO. +- 2) Otherwise, the first 7 bits of that subchannel of transmitted Field B shall be set to binary ONE, and the eighth bit of that subchannel shall be set to binary ZERO. + +NOTE – The RSP is one's complemented so that the receiver can unambiguously distinguish Field A from Field B, even in case of loss of synchronization. + +#### **9.3.2.2 Receiver procedure** + +In Phase 2b, the receiver shall search all received subchannels in Field B for any of the eight possible values of RSP and the "all binary ONEs" pattern. Since the subchannel alignment between the transmitter and receiver may be different, transmitted RSP patterns may appear in different subchannel positions at the receiver. + +Moreover, if the receiver detects the "all binary ONEs" pattern in one subchannel and correct values of RSP in at least four other subchannels, it is possible that one of the bytes in the 8-byte sequence + +that comprises the transmitted RSP patterns has been corrupted by network equipment – every bit in that byte will be a binary ONE (see 9.3.1.2 for an example of this phenomenon at work in Phase 2a). The terminal shall determine if this is the case by checking, as follows, the subchannels that contain neither RSP nor all binary ONES: + +- if these subchannels contain a pattern similar to RSP except for a single replacement of binary ZERO with binary ONE; and +- if the replacement occurs in the same bit position for all such subchannels, + +then the terminal shall consider all eight values of RSP to have been detected correctly if, and only if, all subsequently received RSPs are corrupted in the same fashion. + +RSP shall be considered to have been acquired when it is detected in 4 consecutive Field B positions. If RSP is not acquired in at least 6 subchannels within 2 seconds of entry into Phase 2b, the V.140 procedures shall terminate. + +NOTE – Even if network misalignment and restriction is different in each direction of transmission, the receiver of the Phase 2b signal will detect, at most, two Field B subchannels without RSP. One of these will have been anticipated based on the result of Phase 2a, and the other will indicate which subchannel is restricted in the network direction toward the far-end. + +The receiver shall stop searching for additional RSP patterns in subchannels when any one of the following conditions is satisfied: + +- RSPs have been acquired in all subchannels; or +- after 20 Field B positions beyond the point at which the sixth RSP pattern was acquired, given that the remaining RSPs have been replaced either by a pattern of all binary ONES or by a pattern of 7 binary ONES followed by a binary ZERO. + +The terminal shall then determine subchannel alignment and presence as received at the far-end terminal by examining Field B. It shall then proceed to Phase 2c. + +### 9.3.3 Determination of network characteristics and bit-alignment from received SP/RSP + +The primary goal of the procedures of Phase 2a and 2b is to determine whether a 64 kbit/s interface is restricted (i.e., 64R rather than 64C), because terminals that ascertain that their interface is 64R must then compensate for those subchannels that do not carry data. See 9.3.4 for details. + +If all of the received subchannels in Phase 2a contain valid SP, the interface is 64C or 56C, and no special procedures are required. + +NOTE 1 – In some cases, when the "all-binary-ONES pattern" is referred to below, a pattern of 7 binary ONES and one binary ZERO may be assumed to be synonymous with the all-binary-ONES pattern. If a terminal acquires a pattern of 7 binary ONES, and one binary ZERO in any subchannel in Field B, a subchannel is not being transmitted by or passed through the network from the local terminal. This pattern was received at the far-end terminal as all binary ONES and but was sent back as specified in 9.3.2.1 (7 binary ONES and one binary ZERO). + +However, if any of the received subchannels in Phase 2a contain the all-binary-ONES pattern rather than the expected SP, the interface is 64R. The received subchannel that contains the all-binary-ONES pattern does not carry any useful data and shall be ignored (see 9.3.4). + +Moreover, if during Phase 2b there are one or two subchannels that contain the all-binary-ONES pattern rather than the expected RSP, a subchannel is not being transmitted by the near-end terminal. To determine which subchannel is not being transmitted, the terminal shall identify the RSP(s) missing from the Phase 2b signal. Each missing RSP can be associated with a subchannel by assuming that RSPs are transmitted in subchannels in the order RSP-A through RSP-H, i.e., if subchannel $x$ contains RSP-A, subchannel $(x + 1) \bmod 8$ will contain RSP-B, subchannel $(x + 2) \bmod 8$ will contain RSP-C, and so forth up to RSP-H. Once this association is done, one or more of these RSP(s) will be missing (i.e., replaced by the all-binary-ONES pattern) and is, therefore, not being received from the far-end terminal. Hence, one of the corresponding SPs is not being + +transmitted to the far-end by the network (although the near-end terminal is attempting to transmit it). + +NOTE 2 – If the result of Phase 2a indicates that only 7 subchannels are active, and Phase 2b results in 7 RSP patterns and one pattern of all binary ONES, this also indicates that a subchannel is not being transmitted by or passed through the network from the local terminal; it can be assumed that two directions of restriction overlap, since networks are always restricted in both directions. + +In order to determine which RSP and hence which SP is not being transmitted, the terminal shall identify the subchannel that DOES NOT contain all binary ONES in Phase 2a but DOES contain all binary ONES in Phase 2b. The RSP corresponding to this subchannel is missing, and the SP corresponding to this RSP was not transmitted by the network. See Figure 14 for an example. + +NOTE 3 – In the example shown in Figure 14, the results of Phases 2a and 2b for a particular terminal are shown. In this case, the terminal received all-binary-ONES in subchannel 4 during Phase 2a, rather than SP-H, which was expected. Also, during Phase 2b, the terminal received all-binary-ONES in subchannels 4 and 7; it was expecting RSP-B and RSP-E, respectively, in those subchannels. Since the all-binary-ONES pattern was received in subchannel 4 during both Phase 2a or Phase 2b, it can be inferred that this subchannel 4 does not contain valid received data. However, subchannel 7 DID contain valid data during Phase 2a, but NOT during Phase 2b. Therefore, RSP-E was never received because it was never sent by the far-end; the far-end did not send it because it did not receive SP-E, and therefore subchannel 5 is not being transmitted to the far-end by the network and should not be used. + +| | Subchannel
1 | Subchannel
2 | Subchannel
3 | Subchannel
4 | Subchannel
5 | Subchannel
6 | Subchannel
7 | Subchannel
8 | +|--------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------| +| SP sent | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | SP-H | +| SP received
(Phase 2a) | SP-E | SP-F | SP-G | All ONES | SP-A | SP-B | SP-C | SP-D | +| RSP received
(Phase 2b) | RSP-G | RSP-H | RSP-A | All ONES | RSP-C | RSP-D | All ONES | RSP-F | +| RSP NOT
received | | | | RSP-B | | | RSP-E | | +| Channel not
transmitted
from far-end | | | | No data
received
here
| | | | | +| SP not
transmitted
from near-end | | | | | | | SP-E
not received,
but data is
received
| | + +(No data is received on subchannel 4 during Phases 2a and 2b, +therefore, it is not being transferred from the far-end. +Data IS received on subchannel 7, but RSP-E should have been.) + +**Figure 14/V.140 – Example of determination of network characteristics +from Phase 2a and Phase 2b** + +Relative misalignment of subchannels between terminals can also be determined using the information accumulated during Phases 2a and 2b, if necessary (most protocols do not require any compensation for such misalignment, but a few do, e.g., unframed G.711 audio). + +### 9.3.4 Phase 2c – Concluding Phase 2 and proceeding to Phase 3 + +At the conclusion of Phase 2, each terminal has knowledge of the relative alignment of subchannels between the terminals, as well as knowledge, if any, of the subchannels which are not transmitted to and from the remote terminal. Each terminal shall use such knowledge as follows: + +- When transmitting bytes during Phase 2c, the terminal shall leave out bits as necessary to avoid sending data in a subchannel that is not being transmitted or passed through the + +network to the far-end terminal. The terminal shall follow this procedure, when appropriate, for other protocols (typically, protocols that include a framing signal), EXCEPT: + +- during Phase 3, when the terminal shall insert fill bits as necessary to avoid sending data in a subchannel that is not being transmitted (or passed through the network) to the far-end terminal. Also, the terminal shall follow this procedure when appropriate for other protocols (typically, protocols based upon HDLC). +- When receiving bytes, the terminal shall skip bits to eliminate data received in a subchannel that is not being received (or passed through the network) from the far-end terminal. +- If the terminal is to support protocols that require proper alignment (e.g., unframed G.711 audio) of subchannels between transmitter and receiver, the transmitter shall compensate as necessary for any relative misalignment of the subchannels between it and the far-end terminal so that the far-end terminal will receive data properly aligned on octet boundaries. + +The terminal shall follow the above procedures for the duration of the network connection, i.e., during Phases 2c and 3 and in any protocols or procedures used subsequently. + +#### 9.3.4.1 Transmitter procedure + +The transmitter shall repeatedly transmit the Phase 2c signal. + +This signal serves to acknowledge the acquisition of RSP, while continuing to transmit RSP in all subchannels, in case the far-end has not yet proceeded to Phase 2c. + +#### 9.3.4.2 Receiver procedure + +In Phase 2c, the receiver shall search for: + +- Field A of the Phase 2c signal; and +- two or more contiguous HDLC flags (01111110) coded according to the Phase 3 signalling. + +This signal shall be considered to have been acquired when either four consecutive Phase 2c Field A signals are detected or when two sets of two contiguous HDLC flags are detected. If this signal is not acquired within two seconds of entry into Phase 2c, the V.140 procedures shall terminate, and the terminal shall disconnect the channel or proceed as otherwise pre-conditioned. + +NOTE – The HDLC flags will be detected if the far-end terminal enters Phase 3 before the near-end terminal does. + +Upon acquiring this signal, the terminal shall proceed to Phase 3. + +## 9.4 Phase 3 – Role arbitration, capability exchange, and mode selection + +In Phase 3, the two terminals exchange capabilities, select a protocol mode, and initiate operation in the selected mode. + +Throughout Phase 3, the most recently transmitted message PDUs shall be repeated continuously, one message in each HDLC frame, until a different message PDU is transmitted or V.140 procedures terminate. + +### 9.4.1 roleAndCapability transmission + +Upon entering Phase 3, the terminal shall transmit the **roleAndCapability** PDU. + +Upon receiving a **roleAndCapability** PDU, the terminal shall assign a numerical value to the **role** parameter in said PDU according to Table 6 and also to the **role** parameter value that it transmitted. If these numerical values differ, the terminal shall be the "Initiator" if it has the higher number or the "Responder" if it has the lower number. + +**Table 6/V.140 – Initiator/Responder determination table** + +| Role | Value | +|------------------|-------| +| originate | 3 | +| unknown | 2 | +| answer | 1 | + +If the two values from Table 6 are equal, each terminal's **arbitrationField** value shall be substituted for its **role** value. The terminal with the higher value shall be considered the Initiator, and the other terminal shall be considered the Responder. + +If the two values from Table 6 are equal, and the **arbitrationField** values are equal, the terminal shall transmit the **terminate** PDU with the **cause** value set to **roleCollision**. + +### 9.4.2 Initiator procedure + +The Initiator shall transmit either: + +- 1) the **modeSelect** PDU to choose the selected mode; or +- 2) the **youChoose** PDU to defer selection to the other terminal; or +- 3) the **terminate** PDU with the **cause** field set to **noSuitableModes**. This should occur only if the far-end's capability set did not include any protocol modes useful to the calling user. + +When transmitting the **modeSelect** PDU, the Initiator should take account of the order of preferences of capabilities indicated in the **roleAndCapability** PDU it had previously received from the Responder. + +If the Initiator sent **modeSelect**, it shall wait for receipt of the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU, and upon receiving it, shall terminate V.140 procedures and begin the selected protocol mode. + +If the Initiator sent **youChoose**, it shall wait for receipt of the **modeSelect** PDU, and upon receiving it, shall transmit the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU 20 times, then terminate V.140 procedures and begin the selected protocol mode. + +The Initiator shall not transmit the **youChoose** PDU unless it has identified one or more useful common modes; i.e., the **roleAndCapability** PDU it had previously received from the Responder must contain useful modes that are the same as those signalled by the Initiator using the **roleAndCapability** PDU. + +### 9.4.3 Responder procedure + +The Responder shall wait for receipt of either a **modeSelect** PDU, a **youChoose** PDU, or a **terminate** PDU. + +If the Responder receives **modeSelect**, it shall transmit the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU 20 times, then terminate V.140 procedures and begin the selected protocol mode. + +If the Responder receives **youChoose**, it shall transmit the **modeSelect** PDU, then wait for receipt of the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU, and upon receiving it, shall terminate V.140 procedures and begin the selected protocol mode. When transmitting the **modeSelect** PDU, the Responder should take account of the order of preferences of capabilities indicated in the **roleAndCapability** PDU it had previously received from the Initiator. + +The Responder shall never transmit **youChoose**. + +### 9.4.4 General Phase 3 procedures + +The procedures in this clause apply to all of Phase 3, for both Initiator and Responder, in addition to the procedures above. + +Any terminal which has sent the **modeSelect** PDU shall wait for the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU to arrive. While waiting, such a terminal shall also search for signals appropriate to the protocol mode selected. Any such terminal shall repeatedly send the **modeSelect** PDU until either: + +- signals appropriate to the selected protocol mode are detected; or +- the **modeSelectAcknowledge** PDU is received with a correct FCS field. + +If either of these two events occurs, the terminal shall immediately cease transmitting Phase 3 PDUs and shall begin transmission of signals and execution of procedures appropriate to the selected protocol mode for negotiation, exchange of capabilities, etc. as defined for that protocol. + +Unrecognized **nonStandard** messages and capabilities shall be ignored. + +#### 9.4.4.1 Time-out and abnormal termination + +If the terminal waits longer than two seconds for a responding PDU, the terminal shall transmit the **terminate** PDU with the **cause** field set to **timerExpiration**. + +Any terminal receiving a PDU, other than those specified as appropriate in these procedures, shall transmit the **terminate** PDU with the **cause** field set to **protocolViolation**. + +Any terminal receiving a **modeSelect** PDU containing a mode which was not listed in its transmitted **capabilitySet** shall transmit the **terminate** PDU with the **cause** field set to **modeNotAvailable**. + +Any terminal transmitting the **terminate** PDU for any reason shall transmit it 20 times, then terminate V.140 procedures. The terminal may optionally disconnect the channel at that point. + +If the terminal receives the **terminate** PDU with a correct FCS field, it shall immediately terminate V.140 procedures. The terminal may optionally disconnect the channel at that point. + +## 9.5 Entering selected mode + +Terminals shall enter the selected protocol mode by stopping all transmission of data related to V.140 and starting procedures appropriate to the selected mode. Terminals shall not transmit useful data bits in subchannels which were identified in Phase 2 as not being passed by the network, and shall skip or otherwise ignore bits in similar received subchannels (see 9.3.4). + +Terminals entering G.711 audio, or any mode making use of G.711 audio (such as GSTN modem modulations over G.711 audio) as the selected mode shall continuously examine subchannels 7 and 8 for resumption of Phase 1 signalling by the far-end. + +# 10 Resuming V.140 from a selected mode + +The procedures of V.140 can be used to select another operation mode after termination of a previously selected mode. + +Terminals shall return to V.140 from selected modes by one of the following procedures: + +- Terminals returning to V.140 from G.711 audio shall follow the procedures of V.140 starting with Phase 1. +- Terminals returning to V.140 from any other mode shall terminate transmissions by any protocols other than V.140 and provide a clear channel for V.140 procedures. The terminal shall then follow the procedures of Phase 3. + +In either case, the terminal initiating return to V.140 shall be considered the Originator for the Phase 3 **roleAndCapability** message, and the responding terminal shall be considered the Answerer. + +This feature may be used to provide an optional initial phase at the beginning of a multimedia call in which users have the opportunity to speak in voice telephony mode before proceeding to multimedia telephony. This feature may also be used to switch from one multimedia telephony mode to another, or back into voice telephony mode. + +# Annex A + +## ASN.1 definition of Phase 3 PDU values + +This annex specifies the syntax of PDUs using the notation defined in ASN.1 according to ITU-T Rec. X.680 | ISO/IEC 8824-1. + +``` +HDISPATCH DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= +BEGIN + +-- Export all symbols + +-- ===== +-- Top level PDUs +-- ===== + +HDispatchPDU ::= CHOICE { + nonStandard NonStandardMessage, + roleAndCapability RoleAndCapabilityMessage, + modeSelect Mode, + youChoose NULL, + modeSelectAcknowledge NULL, + terminate TerminateMessage, + ... +} + +RoleAndCapabilityMessage ::= SEQUENCE { + role + CHOICE {originate NULL, + unknown NULL, + answer NULL, + ...}, + arbitrationField INTEGER(0..4294967295), -- 32 bit random # + capabilitySet SEQUENCE SIZE (1..65535) OF Capability, + ... +} + +Capability ::= CHOICE { + nonStandard NonStandardParameter, + isdn + CHOICE {isdnCapability IsdnCapability, + multilinkAdditionalConnection NULL, + -- Express this cap alone to force-- + -- association of this channel with + -- an existing call + is13871 + SEQUENCE -- "BONDING" protocol-- {withIsdnCapability + IsdnCapability, + ...}, + h244 + SEQUENCE -- channel aggregation protocol-- {withIsdnCapability + IsdnCapability, + ...}, + ...}, + ... +} + +IsdnCapability ::= CHOICE { + g711aLaw SEQUENCE {...}, + g711uLaw SEQUENCE {...}, + h320 SEQUENCE {...}, +} +``` + +``` + +h324AnnexD SEQUENCE {...}, +h324Multilink SEQUENCE {...}, +group4Fax SEQUENCE {...}, +t120 SEQUENCE {...}, +t140 SEQUENCE {...}, -- text chatting protocol +v110 SEQUENCE {...}, +v120 SEQUENCE {...}, +rfc1661 SEQUENCE {withH323 BOOLEAN, + ...}, +... +} + +Mode ::= CHOICE { + nonStandard NonStandardParameter, + plainIsdnMode IsdnMode, + h244 IsdnMode, + is13871 IsdnMode, -- BONDING protocol + multilinkAdditionalConnection + SEQUENCE {callAssociationNumber INTEGER(0..4294967295), + ...}, + ... +} + +IsdnMode ::= CHOICE { + nonStandard NonStandardParameter, + g711aLaw SEQUENCE {...}, + g711uLaw SEQUENCE {...}, + h320 SEQUENCE {...}, + h324AnnexD SEQUENCE {...}, + h324Multilink SEQUENCE {...}, + group4Fax SEQUENCE {...}, + t120 SEQUENCE {...}, + rfc1661 SEQUENCE {...}, + ... +} + +TerminateMessage ::= SEQUENCE { + cause + CHOICE {nonStandard NonStandardParameter, + timerExpiration NULL, + roleCollision NULL, + noSuitableModes NULL, + invalidModeSelected NULL, + protocolViolation NULL, + modeNotAvailable NULL, + ...}, + ... +} + +-- ===== +-- Non standard Message definitions +-- ===== + +NonStandardMessage ::= SEQUENCE {nonStandardData NonStandardParameter, + ... +} + +NonStandardParameter ::= SEQUENCE { + nonStandardIdentifier NonStandardIdentifier, + data OCTET STRING +} + +``` + +``` + +NonStandardIdentifier ::= CHOICE { + object OBJECT IDENTIFIER, + h221NonStandard + SEQUENCE {t35CountryCode INTEGER(0..255), -- country, per T.35-- + t35Extension INTEGER(0..255), -- assigned nationally-- + manufacturerCode INTEGER(0..65535)} +} -- assigned nationally + +END + +``` + +The use of ITU-T Recs G.722 and G.725 within these procedures is for further study. + +The following refers to fields and structures used within the **roleAndCapability** PDU: + +- **g711aLaw**, **g711uLaw**, **h320**, **h324AnnexD**, **h324Multilink**, **group4Fax**, **t120**, **t140**, **v110**, or **v120** assigned to an **IsdnCapability** field shall indicate that the terminal can support operation according to ITU-T Recs G.711 (A-law encoding), G.711 ( $\mu$ -law encoding), H.320, Annex D/H.324, T.6, T.120, T.140, V.110, or V.120, respectively. +- **rfc1661** assigned to the **IsdnCapability** structure shall indicate that the terminal can support operation according to RFC 1661 (also known as Internet Standard 51), as adopted by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). If the **withH323** sub-field is set true, the terminal can support operation according to ITU-T Rec. H.323 overlying the protocol defined in RFC 1661. +- **is13871** assigned to the **isdn** structure which is within the **Capability** structure shall indicate that the terminal can support channel aggregation according to the procedures of ISO/IEC 13871 (also known as BONDING), and the accompanying **withIsdnCapability** field shall indicate a communications protocol which can be run in conjunction with ISO/IEC 13871. +- **h244** assigned to the **isdn** structure within the **Capability** structure shall indicate that the terminal can support channel aggregation using the procedures of ITU-T Rec. H.244, and the accompanying **withIsdnCapability** field shall indicate a protocol which can be run in conjunction with said procedures. + +The following refers to fields and structures used within the **modeSelect** PDU: + +- **g711aLaw**, **g711uLaw**, **h320**, **h324AnnexD**, **h324Multilink**, **group4Fax**, **t120**, **t140**, **v110**, or **v120** assigned to the **plainIsdnMode** field (an **IsdnMode** structure) shall indicate that the terminal has selected operation according to ITU-T Recs G.711 (a-law encoding), G.711 ( $\mu$ -law encoding), H.320, Annex D/H.324, Annex F/H.324, T.6, T.120, T.140, V.110, or V.120, respectively. +- **rfc1661** assigned to the **plainIsdnMode** field (an **IsdnMode** structure) shall indicate that the terminal has selected operation according to RFC 1661 (Internet Standard 51), the Point-to-Point protocol, as adopted by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). +- **is13871** (an **IsdnMode** structure) assigned to the **Mode** structure shall indicate that the terminal has chosen to use the ISO/IEC 13871 channel aggregation protocol, and the value selected for the **is13871** field shall indicate which communications protocol shall be used in conjunction with ISO/IEC 13871. +- **h244** (an **IsdnMode** structure) assigned to the **Mode** structure shall indicate that the terminal has chosen to use the H.244 channel aggregation protocol, and the value selected for the **h244** field shall indicate which communications protocol shall be used in conjunction with ITU-T Rec. H.244. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.15-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.15-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5aefaa603b7be5bbd0c6802e644219263b770594 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.15-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.15 + +# DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK --- + +## USE OF ACOUSTIC COUPLING FOR DATA TRANSMISSION + +### ITU-T Recommendation V.15 + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +## NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.15 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## **USE OF ACOUSTIC COUPLING FOR DATA TRANSMISSION** + +*(Geneva, 1972; amended at Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984)* + +*Note* - Acoustic coupling is a technique used to couple the output of a modem to an analogue telecommunication facility using acoustic energy/power between the device and a telephone instrument. As such, it provides for minimum complexity of attachment as well as excellent galvanic isolation. However, the technique does limit the data signalling rates used and does limit the functionality which can be provided by the associated modem. Since this arrangement will generally be used to communicate with a permanently installed V Series modem at a remote station, the characteristics of the modem will, accordingly, comply with requirements defined elsewhere in these Series V Recommendations, e.g., V.21 or V.23. As far as functionality permits, interfaces with the associated DTE will be as defined in those Recommendations. Because of operator intervention required in manipulating the telephone handset, automatic calling and automatic answering are not normally considered part of the functionality of an acoustically coupled modem. However, an acoustically coupled modem can call a remote station which has automatic answering capability and can observe the protocol defined in Recommendation V.25, § 6, "Manual data station calling automatic answering data station" as modified herein. + +The CCITT, + +*considering* + +that there is a wide variety of telephone instruments in existence and that the acoustic path involved in the use of any coupling device cannot be accurately prescribed for all cases, and hence it will be difficult to ensure satisfactory transmission in all situations, + +*recommends* + +**1** that acoustic coupling of data transmission equipment via telephone instruments to the telephone transmission network should not be used for permanent installations. + +It is, however, recognized that there may be a need for a means to provide temporary connection of portable data transmission equipment to the network in circumstances where it may not be possible to obtain convenient access to the subscriber's line terminals. + +The use of acoustic coupling for temporary communications is subject to the agreement of the Administration in charge of the telephone network to which the equipment will be connected. + +If an Administration decides to permit acoustic coupling for temporary data transmission stations, the acoustic coupling equipment conforms to the following: + +- 1) The maximum power output of the subscriber's equipment to the line shall not exceed 1 mW at any frequency. + +The mean permitted telephone line signal power shall not exceed -13 dBm0. + +- 2) If $p$ is the signal power in the frequency band 0-4 kHz, the signal power outside this band shall not exceed the following values when integrated over any period of approximately 3 seconds: + +$p$ - 20 dB in the band 4 to 8 kHz, + +$p$ - 40 dB in the band 8 to 12 kHz, + +$p$ - 60 dB in each 4-kHz band above 12 kHz. + +- 3) The frequencies emitted by the transducer shall be such as not to interfere with national and international telephone signalling systems and pilot signals involved in the telephone connection envisaged. +- 4) Adequate protection shall be provided in the transducer to avoid causing any dangerous electric potential and currents to the telephone system. +- 5) It shall not be possible to cause acoustic shock to telephone users under any normal condition or when the acoustic coupler develops any single fault. +- 6) The mechanical arrangements of the transducer shall not cause mechanical damage to the telephone instrument. +- 7) In addition to the contents of this Recommendation, the regulations of the national Administration must also be complied with. + +**2** that acoustically coupled equipment be compatible with "hard-wired counterparts" at the remote location to the extent that: + +- 1) The characteristics of the equivalent V Series (V.21, V.23, etc.) modem line signals are complied with (otherwise communication will be impossible). +- 2) An equivalent V.24 interface is provided to the DTE, with the following exceptions: + - circuit 108 is power ON indicator only, and cannot be used to control the connection of the modem to the line; + - circuit 125 is inoperative; only manual answering can be accomplished. +- 3) Acoustically coupled modem equipment designed to operate with remote modems: + - which have automatic answering capability, and + - which are specifically dedicated and are adapted (by means of optionally extended answer tone duration) to working with acoustically coupled calling stations + +shall operate in the mode prescribed in Recommendation V.25, § 6 where placement of the telephone instrument handset on the acoustic coupler by the operator is tantamount to depressing a data button, as specified in § 6. + +These modems shall also comply with the response time requirements of circuits 106 and 109 as specified in the appropriate modem Recommendation. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9f6d67241c106bacbd986a20f0cde3a95f00a0a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:e0c5a05334a82fffbd642dccc57051aa68144b5620810124932d4d7907ca681c +size 43393 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08441fa90c5fd11994626f662ac13f19_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08441fa90c5fd11994626f662ac13f19_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..138447cdd95467624ae2c84dbc7cc638c00cdaea --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08441fa90c5fd11994626f662ac13f19_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7594b2ba634a6a0b62b89d7582d449a977562c983f22651dc1969174fbb98bf2 +size 61019 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8439c372c241410e6b4c5617c11e88b8de665887 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:22ce6e8aa9f3362e89bdc4db29d3ca1f0cb9a79b968d5f9e662e638f8032dbe4 +size 112384 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8496e18a9b3e5eddf5f9d3f486e1e1ee0ea66351 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:236a60288c7ef9c53c75a673a24e9b70495ba8c4023711a29a0367579d0108e4 +size 31170 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/17f0cf80b9c38adb460d4ca836960da7_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/17f0cf80b9c38adb460d4ca836960da7_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..711b2d824595747994530abda46125d342777ebc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/17f0cf80b9c38adb460d4ca836960da7_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:88c720224a7a4188952a934e697ca630cefaff7694d9fb817ca6499ecbbe875b +size 74598 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d36a4cef8eca9c7b79dd902f1890bfa7cf947fdc --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52bdffe1b4d4dd263104f171abde1b0eb820418b9008f0fc5a1ded2d0cb78faf +size 79188 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/24ba47df8be44ae91945d88ce2232df5_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/24ba47df8be44ae91945d88ce2232df5_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0c52bcd5f5094c0c9bfa8200332d304d77883d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/24ba47df8be44ae91945d88ce2232df5_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:24ac004c32ec2dd81ac47ca52ffe9fe89b5dd75c2fbf27dc037924fde65c1f4a +size 86670 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e52f9899fe3f4994ae056d0ec183a3d28a3ef86 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0707f5e7a3dec267fe687f00e80e83015d0f375494b1a16ef9a35a84c4471ac3 +size 81238 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/3e8e3bdb3d90f0856266d4eaf36abba1_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/3e8e3bdb3d90f0856266d4eaf36abba1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d8955cfabb221934354ec575111ebac264ddbc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/3e8e3bdb3d90f0856266d4eaf36abba1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:bf4181b192dbb5978075f98e40d15e278ea2177e470e672a9edc1b894093faa3 +size 79252 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/4619c14be962e4c3ba6613aad97f7a86_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/4619c14be962e4c3ba6613aad97f7a86_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ef7fb2251bfc20dd6c81c4c0734083277eb28ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/4619c14be962e4c3ba6613aad97f7a86_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8486d0ce3da9316dd704257c56efad5e14a0cdf2b2141fd79e44fdb430cc4ba0 +size 62987 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5a1abd59a95fa47ae192807de151e9eb_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5a1abd59a95fa47ae192807de151e9eb_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c913f97aae5bf0463a4bbf487d5aee894d3f9c69 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5a1abd59a95fa47ae192807de151e9eb_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f58a43dbe69e40a09beb8fc26226df79c9329eb295132a124e48cf61fd0d53c9 +size 59710 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5c3dd31372f59e15250f0ab1613ca485_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5c3dd31372f59e15250f0ab1613ca485_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5ea304630a7529790e188da4b1ec80d4ecf6e8e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5c3dd31372f59e15250f0ab1613ca485_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9acf90361811fec061bbe28da7f4e40cd45249429404fb710717df398400bd26 +size 36845 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08c6dc914d216075dde4713b6b6ff72f03b4e395 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6cf431775a5e0c8332b9b241124c36af86b123c7aa71876b32039859504994cb +size 55488 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6031b46d356ee24f96bfe37ee2cb7616_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6031b46d356ee24f96bfe37ee2cb7616_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c17b5d3df8613a2c3ee523d216c230589e62ff48 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6031b46d356ee24f96bfe37ee2cb7616_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9e326ac5b42c210df7b82af882987aa766f64939375185602d7fbb476bff0fe8 +size 80594 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/60a40901e77feeb97ab6cf9c6d9418c3_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/60a40901e77feeb97ab6cf9c6d9418c3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0d95b10b6365e60eed58a19c785660afb7bb982 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/60a40901e77feeb97ab6cf9c6d9418c3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6847daca4aaf28aed42bb66ce75fb21d642eb1d21b12e493388e747e1861e118 +size 51208 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6707cae4df136f92a0c9f3a4676f91a6_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6707cae4df136f92a0c9f3a4676f91a6_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..379410854c9bb72144ea76b83b1adb0440228290 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/6707cae4df136f92a0c9f3a4676f91a6_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3d5c6acfe13b51dd35defa679b92f9023abfc4bd4407dd337b393a0e5edc310b +size 65397 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/74d23510f27b21403a7be84820821863_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/74d23510f27b21403a7be84820821863_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6885a995e477d22915fe3cc16f5edbf992c01164 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/74d23510f27b21403a7be84820821863_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:faa39eee848ce25a95febf86ef78dcfef1fbad1285cbd17401329077901a1f2d +size 111381 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/76d19e4271bf243b20d55a98efd51483_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/76d19e4271bf243b20d55a98efd51483_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed083d993d70a7a2c0d03d36712631e8353f6779 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/76d19e4271bf243b20d55a98efd51483_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:48944ccb3e25df0545fb95a0e92d4f1199c6d44a536459ae1c9d5dea1d2f917b +size 80085 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3cdfcf119e2e91c00b0f6c00dbf9ad3a3133a20e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7d3e366b72d3483c8f157d3d6fb148ee7b2de63713ee379706c052d65003969e +size 73100 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..667b0ad9432862ce034833e5a41c07158672f704 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:113889f856afde7a4ceedb8af3e15090275ea28ff134da0384d07921596afa47 +size 81737 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c44ad589cd23854de0326146b710e4ea75f570c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:03467c882a01b3f522921253c60d2961edbc1ee5739097f22bda8ac436571682 +size 8256 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcd2fc6b8e3db4c7570756fa36890d887a3fccc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:68054a5b6891517a0f04edd0811785102680ebb3c9b4cff53562fd7602000858 +size 61407 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b86eb8899c39c1a77656c99895789a77e03f7d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:115c92ac033a5f8e049b6f0f5edb0ba62da4ac9aba8d2782f69e7f35c0d23a5b +size 67662 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aa6e28822419dba9f22129fee66c9c4c_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aa6e28822419dba9f22129fee66c9c4c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2f0245a2352349e3f65d558cd947a8167c38381 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aa6e28822419dba9f22129fee66c9c4c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:54b40c95462a6fd600c41cdb59ffa1ca3e55c5f8ff467e1ed55eec4772c40f41 +size 104280 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a12a2ac84c58c0a363c9ec39ae18a090ddd640d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5e8ea4daee040632cca9520ec0359a388f82c71f2f92a5d04d67b0e853069a4f +size 73897 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/bc6f20871b4f01c61470306c304fc9fe_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/bc6f20871b4f01c61470306c304fc9fe_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8112be8580f614c1f13e9ce8b08b0bf2ef3ea2a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/bc6f20871b4f01c61470306c304fc9fe_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8664860f2138c6eb9af9ff854cb2299ef255e56d4b1f50bd4dde4daad52299a9 +size 87025 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..daf3a34a02d10d3d190ef02118a1db4aad059344 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2aadf44fd513a216a9f5a7fd1d8c00cc28508683bcc6fb27508686778fe82ea1 +size 82474 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d44c3090f7900f847aef803816a2c2c39ecb165 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6d6c5192160d6e26ec096124d62d985680a83db3821e19dd424518d00a67ef2e +size 83937 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd02e3f7eb430e777e0d54927b9d7660373846b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b01e73aeaaa981c72405cdea23dbb236dd409d609c2364564e931b366ea38a57 +size 60078 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/d04f4b76a3f7aa0ff51714fb1f71d9d3_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/d04f4b76a3f7aa0ff51714fb1f71d9d3_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9afdaadd8c389541b4b10d32bb2f54e95046a5b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/d04f4b76a3f7aa0ff51714fb1f71d9d3_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:feeec375b2df341ca4cd65de22ced878c8135ca6fe2aea9cd38298e937d656ad +size 77151 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2927a4c791fa5fa82fcbc10338f691132af803eb --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0e3b685bdbec3891fe491b0e14994258a0cc95e4ec88f562469aacf9dab646e8 +size 10911 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ced5a8fcf1872dee5f54f62fad7a7a588e69809 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:40f9b5a71da6f153888f0f94421d97c1368ac5b0d2e57eeb35d6f0d7bcd0c465 +size 62347 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/efb282bed9f06eef1987a14fb27bc599_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/efb282bed9f06eef1987a14fb27bc599_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0257e97638c66c32ffeb6f7fea4702df49f2b25d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/efb282bed9f06eef1987a14fb27bc599_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d0b445d986f812c0cbaf9c451050914aba8204e55b31afa0c51e0f6ee3ace9bf +size 78960 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d916bbe953033350a359276f92ca0d48720cee19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ef2f90e7d5ebab6d4609344fb4735b729c6b022982ce3b953dbb2ce68e5ae76f +size 12314 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7e72243c244e20d2af3fbfa1e5d63e6f219648d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ecc78b0b2babfe69a7403cfbc96321645dfacab54881cfb1cd0ce602758d5126 +size 78824 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/ff0299b306c850173d9aac7783bf1780_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/ff0299b306c850173d9aac7783bf1780_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a0615ae9136c6019d3f9b14182e376382e8e64a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/ff0299b306c850173d9aac7783bf1780_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:532e565d4a28310741a17e869e79f6cfbfaf27c7a063c4434d7a57635d76c86f +size 145986 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95362ac7cfa4e0321f727a29f1eef562182b1ae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.151-200605-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,3229 @@ + + +I n t e r n a t i o n a l   T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n   U n i o n + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**V.151** + +(05/2006) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interworking with other networks + +--- + +**Procedures for the end-to-end connection of +analogue PSTN text telephones over an +IP network utilizing text relay** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.151 + +![ITU logo: a globe with a red lightning bolt and the text 'ITU International Telecommunication Union'](84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with a red lightning bolt striking it. To the right of the globe, the text 'ITU' is written in a large, bold, blue font, and below it, the words 'International Telecommunication Union' are written in a smaller, blue font. + +ITU logo: a globe with a red lightning bolt and the text 'ITU International Telecommunication Union' + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# **ITU-T Recommendation V.151** + +## **Procedures for the end-to-end connection of analogue PSTN text telephones over an IP network utilizing text relay** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation defines the inter-operation of two PSTN to IP Network gateways that facilitate the end-to-end connection of analogue text telephone terminals over an IP network utilizing text relay. + +Amendment 1 introduces Annex E, which defines the RTP payload format for the transport of text as T.140 character data over IP networks, removing the need to make a reference to an historic RFC published by the IETF. It also includes minor editorial changes throughout the document to make references to the newly introduced Annex, removing references to the RFC. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.151 was approved on 29 May 2006 by ITU-T Study Group 16 (2005-2008) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure. + +This release includes new Annex E introduced by V.151 (2006) Amendment 1, approved on 29 August 2007 by ITU-T Study Group 16 (2005-2008) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure + +## **Keywords** + +PSTN textphone, text over IP, text relay, text telephony, ToIP. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2008 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 4 Abbreviations..... | 3 | +| 5 Introduction ..... | 4 | +| 5.1 Overview of Text over IP ..... | 4 | +| 5.2 ToIP system architecture ..... | 4 | +| 5.3 Compliance requirements..... | 5 | +| 5.4 Relationship with other V.15x Recommendations..... | 5 | +| 6 Text telephone-over-IP functions ..... | 6 | +| 7 Connection and network scenarios ..... | 6 | +| 7.1 Service and performance requirements for ToIP..... | 7 | +| 7.2 Audio and text functionality ..... | 7 | +| 8 Transport methods ..... | 8 | +| 8.1 Audio mode ..... | 8 | +| 8.2 VBD mode..... | 8 | +| 8.3 Text relay mode..... | 9 | +| 8.4 Switching between transport modes..... | 10 | +| 9 ToIP operational modes ..... | 11 | +| 10 Text Relay PHY layer operation..... | 12 | +| 11 IP transport for text relay ..... | 12 | +| 11.1 Single and dual port operation of text relay ..... | 13 | +| 11.2 Text relay throughput ..... | 13 | +| 12 Support of DTMF in ToIP ..... | 13 | +| 13 Transition out of text relay ..... | 13 | +| 14 T.140 encoding of text relay ..... | 14 | +| 14.1 Character set support ..... | 14 | +| 14.2 TIA-825A and T.50 encoding requirements ..... | 14 | +| 15 Gateway-to-gateway protocol definitions and procedures ..... | 14 | +| 15.1 Gateway capability and call set-up messages..... | 14 | +| 15.2 Gateway call discrimination messages..... | 16 | +| 16 Start-up mode of operation ..... | 16 | +| 16.1 Inter-relationship with V.150.1 ..... | 16 | +| 16.2 Inter-relation with V.152 ..... | 16 | +| 17 Voiceband data modem interworking requirements..... | 17 | +| 18 Facsimile interworking requirements ..... | 17 | + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 19 Call set-up procedures ..... | 17 | +| 20 Call discrimination procedures ..... | 17 | +| 20.1 V.8 bis processing ..... | 17 | +| 20.2 V.8 CI/XCI processing ..... | 17 | +| 20.3 Call discrimination overview ..... | 18 | +| 20.4 Call discrimination SDL diagrams ..... | 18 | +| 20.5 Visual flow control ..... | 32 | +| Annex A – Procedures for the optional support of SPRT protocol ..... | 33 | +| A.1 Overview ..... | 33 | +| A.2 SDP negotiation ..... | 33 | +| A.3 H.245 negotiation ..... | 34 | +| Annex B – Definition of capabilities for use within H.245-based systems ..... | 35 | +| Annex C – SDP description of sessions supporting V.151 ..... | 39 | +| Annex D – Interworking IP text devices with V.151 gateways ..... | 41 | +| D.1 Introduction ..... | 41 | +| D.2 Exchanging capabilities and opening media streams ..... | 41 | +| D.3 State transition and text handling ..... | 42 | +| Annex E – Payload format and signaling syntax for real-time text transported within an audio stream ..... | 44 | +| E.1 Overview ..... | 44 | +| E.2 Payload format ..... | 44 | +| E.3 Use of redundancy ..... | 45 | +| Appendix I – Background to PSTN text telephony ..... | 47 | +| Appendix II – ToIP call discrimination call flows ..... | 48 | +| II.1 Scope ..... | 48 | +| II.2 Scenarios for call discrimination flows ..... | 48 | +| II.3 Scenarios with SSE protocol being used ..... | 49 | +| II.4 Scenarios with payload type switching being used ..... | 72 | +| Appendix III – The use of [IETF RFC 2198] in [ITU-T V.151] ..... | 83 | +| Appendix IV – Text buffering and transmission ..... | 84 | +| Appendix V – Probing sequence ..... | 85 | +| Bibliography ..... | 86 | + +# ITU-T Recommendation V.151 + +## Procedures for the end-to-end connection of analogue PSTN text telephones over an IP network utilizing text relay + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation defines the interoperation of two PSTN to IP Network gateways that facilitate the end-to-end connection of analogue text telephone terminals over an IP network. + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T F.700] ITU-T Recommendation F.700 (2000), *Framework Recommendation for multimedia services*. +- [ITU-T F.703] ITU-T Recommendation F.703 (2000), *Multimedia conversational services*. +- [ITU-T G.177] ITU-T Recommendation G.177 (1999), *Transmission planning for voiceband services over hybrid Internet/PSTN connections*. +- [ITU-T G.711] ITU-T Recommendation G.711 (1998), *Pulse code modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies*. +- [ITU-T H.245] ITU-T Recommendation H.245 (2006), *Control protocol for multimedia communication*. +- [ITU-T H.248.1] ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1 (2005), *Gateway control protocol: Version 3*. +- [ITU-T H.323 Ann.P] ITU-T Recommendation H.323 (2003), *Packet-based multimedia communications systems, Annex P: Transfer of modem signals over H.323*. +- [ITU-T V.8] ITU-T Recommendation V.8 (2000), *Procedures for starting sessions of data transmission over the public switched telephone network*. +- [ITU-T V.8 bis] ITU-T Recommendation V.8 bis (2000), *Procedures for the identification and selection of common modes of operation between data circuit-terminating equipments (DCEs) and between data terminal equipments (DTEs) over the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits*. +- [ITU-T V.18] ITU-T Recommendation V.18 (2000), *Operational and interworking requirements for DCEs operating in the text telephone mode*. +- [ITU-T V.21] ITU-T Recommendation V.21 (1988), *300 bits per second duplex modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network*. +- [ITU-T V.150.0] ITU-T Recommendation V.150.0 (2003), *Modem-over-IP networks: Foundation*. + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| [ITU-T V.150.1] | ITU-T Recommendation V.150.1 (2003), Modem-over-IP networks: Procedures for the end-to-end connection of V-series DCEs. | +| [ITU-T V.152] | ITU-T Recommendation V.152 (2005), Procedures for supporting voice-band data over IP networks. | +| [IETF RFC 2198] | IETF RFC 2198 (1997), RTP Payload for Redundant Audio Data. | +| [IETF RFC 2327] | IETF RFC 2327 (1998), SDP: Session Description Protocol. | +| [IETF RFC 2733] | IETF RFC 2733 (1999), An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction. | +| [IETF RFC 2833] | IETF RFC 2833 (2000), RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals. | +| [IETF RFC 3407] | IETF RFC 3407 (2002), Session Description Protocol (SDP) Simple Capability Declaration. | + +## 3 Definitions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.1 Baudot:** A five-bit code formerly used in Teletype machines including those text telephones that operate per TIA-825-A standard. The use of the term "Baudot" in this Recommendation is expanded to also include the modulation used by text telephones complying with TIA-825-A. + +**3.2 constant carrier PTP:** A PSTN Textphone (PTP) modulation that uses a carrier signal whose transmission is maintained in-between text spurts. Examples of constant carrier PTP modulations schemes include PTPs that utilize V.21 and V.23 modulations. Constant carrier modulations are also referred to as full duplex (FDX) modulations in this Recommendation. + +**3.3 gateway:** A gateway converts media provided in one type of network to the format required in another type of network. For example, a gateway could terminate bearer channels from a switched circuit network (e.g., DS0s) and media streams from a packet network (e.g., RTP streams in an IP network). + +**3.4 IP text device:** Native IP device that supports text communications and provides text communications interoperability with V.151-compliant gateways. Examples include IP-based IVR systems, voicemail systems, and IP phones. + +**3.5 non-constant carrier PTP:** A PTP modulation that uses a carrier that is only transmitted during a text spurt (and possibly for a period before the text spurt as a preamble). An example of non-constant carrier PTP modulations schemes is that used by EDT-based PTP devices. Non-constant carrier modulations are also referred to as half-duplex (HDX) modulations in this Recommendation. + +**3.6 PSTN textphone:** Term used in this Recommendation to represent all classes of text telephones, including TDD devices. + +**3.7 protocol conversion:** The interworking of dissimilar PTP terminals performed by the ToIP gateways. + +**3.8 telecommunications terminal for the deaf:** A term used in the USA for equipment that provides text telephony. It is synonymous to text telephone. + +**3.9 text over IP:** The dependable transport of analogue PSTN text telephones signals over IP networks using the methods and procedures as defined in this Recommendation. + +**3.10 text spurt:** A sequence of one or more characters transmitted in a text telephony signal without loss of carrier. + +**3.11 text telephone mode:** The operational mode when two devices are interconnected to provide text telephone communications. + +**3.12 text telephone:** A device incorporating text telephony functions. + +**3.13 text telephony:** A telecommunications capability that supports real-time text conversation on communication networks. + +**3.14 voice-band data:** The transport of modem signals over a voice channel of a packet network with the encoding appropriate for modem signals. + +## **3.15 Conventions** + +This Recommendation includes mandatory requirements, recommendations and options; these are designated by the words "shall," "should," and "may" respectively. + +A State Signalling Event (SSE) message is indicated using SSE:(), where is one of the defined media states and is the applicable reason code. + +## **4 Abbreviations** + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +| | | +|--------|----------------------------------------------| +| ANS | V.25 Answer Tone | +| ASNam | V.8 Answer Tone | +| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One | +| CI | V.8 Call Indicator | +| DS0 | Digital Signal level 0 | +| DCE | Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (Modem) | +| DTE | Data Terminal Equipment | +| FEC | Forward Error Correction | +| FDX | Full Duplex | +| FoIP | Fax over Internet Protocol | +| G1 | On-Ramp Gateway | +| G2 | Off-Ramp Gateway | +| HDX | Half Duplex | +| I1 | Originating end-point IP Text telephone | +| I2 | Answering end-point IP Text telephone | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| IP-TLP | IP Transport Layer Protocol | +| ITD | IP Text Device | +| IVR | Interactive Voice Response | +| MoIP | Modem over Internet Protocol | +| PCM | Pulse Code Modulation | +| PHY | Physical transport layer of modem connection | +| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network | + +| | | +|------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| PTP | PSTN Textphone | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| RIC | Reason Identifier Code | +| RTP | Real Time Protocol | +| SPRT | Simple Packet Relay Transport (Annex B of [ITU-T V.150.1]) | +| SSE | State Signalling Events | +| SSRC | Synchronization Source | +| T1 | Originating end-point analogue PSTN Text Telephone | +| T2 | Answering end-point analogue PSTN Text Telephone | +| TDD | Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf | +| TDM | Time division multiplex(ing) | +| ToIP | Text Telephony over IP | +| UDP | User Datagram Protocol | +| VBD | Voice Band Data Mode | +| VoIP | Voice over Internet Protocol | +| XCI | Signal used in V.18 | + +## **5 Introduction** + +## **5.1 Overview of Text over IP** + +Text Telephony over IP (ToIP) is the dependable transport of analogue modulated signals generated by PSTN text telephone over an IP Network. The types of such text telephones and the characteristics of their line signals are described in [ITU-T V.18]. There are three basic models that can be considered for support of this application. These models are dependent upon the transmission characteristics and Quality of Service of the IP network in which the text telephone conversation is being established. The models can be summarized as: + +- a) Support of text telephony over VoIP connections (i.e., utilizing audio mode transport). This model is outside the scope of this Recommendation. +- b) Support of text telephony utilizing Voice Band Data (VBD) transport as defined in [ITU-T V.152]. +- c) Support of text telephony utilizing Text Relay transport with VBD fallback according to this Recommendation. + +This Recommendation includes support for PSTN Textphone (PTP) devices that utilize modulations covered in [ITU-T V.18], including its Annexes A through G. Gateways compliant to this Recommendation are required to support full re-modulation/demodulation of one or more of these PTP modulations in order to transport the data using text relay. The remaining modulations shall be supported using VBD transport. The text relay procedures described in this Recommendation cover the entire set of PTP modulations and can be scaled down for specific implementations that support a subset of the modulations described in [ITU-T V.18]. + +## **5.2 ToIP system architecture** + +Architecturally, this Recommendation primarily considers the support of a PSTN to IP to PSTN structure otherwise called a hybrid Internet/PSTN connection as defined in [ITU-T G.177]. Figure 5-1 illustrates a typical Text Telephony over IP application. + +![Diagram illustrating typical VoIP applications. A central cloud labeled 'IP network' is connected to two gateways. The left gateway connects to a 'Central Office' (server rack) and a 'PSTN textphone'. The right gateway connects to a 'Central office' (server rack) and a 'PSTN textphone'. Both gateways also connect to 'IP textphone' devices. Arrows labeled 'PSTN' indicate connections between the gateways and the PSTN textphones. The diagram is labeled 'V.151(06)_F5-1'.](cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg) + +Diagram illustrating typical VoIP applications. A central cloud labeled 'IP network' is connected to two gateways. The left gateway connects to a 'Central Office' (server rack) and a 'PSTN textphone'. The right gateway connects to a 'Central office' (server rack) and a 'PSTN textphone'. Both gateways also connect to 'IP textphone' devices. Arrows labeled 'PSTN' indicate connections between the gateways and the PSTN textphones. The diagram is labeled 'V.151(06)\_F5-1'. + +**Figure 5-1 – Typical ToIP applications** + +The possible connection combinations are: + +- a) PSTN Text Telephone to PSTN Text Telephone; +- b) PSTN Text Telephone to IP Text Telephone. + +This Recommendation deals with PSTN Text Telephone to PSTN Text Telephone operation. PSTN Text Telephone to IP Text Devices that support the protocol defined in Annex E is described in Annex D. + +## 5.3 Compliance requirements + +This Recommendation does not require behaviour that is inconsistent with other Recommendations, or with national regulatory requirements, and shall be interpreted accordingly. Neither does it preclude the use of proprietary or non-standard text telephones; however, it does caution that if such devices are used, then care should be taken so as not to harm the functionality and procedures defined herein. + +In order to be compliant with this Recommendation, an implementation must provide functionality that is defined as mandatory. + +## 5.4 Relationship with other V.15x Recommendations + +The V.15x series of Recommendations (currently including [ITU-T V.150.1] and [ITU-T V.152]) define the support of data modems (using VBD or relay) and facsimile modems (using VBD) over IP networks. Modem over IP (MoIP) support is either through modem-relay mode or voiceband data mode. Since PTP endpoints utilize data modems at the physical layer, there may be interaction between the procedures defined by the various V.15x-series Recommendations for the case when the gateway has implemented and successfully negotiated the support with the remote gateway. For each V.15x Recommendation, there is a requirement that the support for it be successfully negotiated with the remote gateway during the signalling phase of the call for the procedures defined in the Recommendation to be used by the gateway. + +Gateways compliant with this Recommendation may also concurrently implement data MoIP support via [ITU-T V.150.1] and/or VBD support via [ITU-T V.152]. + +# 6 Text telephone-over-IP functions + +Figure 6-1 provides a conceptual reference model for a ToIP gateway. The model shows two stacks conjoined by the ToIP application. The left-hand stack is that of a typical text telephone which has a signal converter (modulation). The right-hand stack represents the IP networking functions of a ToIP Gateway. The ToIP application as indicated in Figure 6-1 is defined by the normative contents of this Recommendation. + +![Figure 6-1: ToIP gateway reference model. This block diagram shows the interaction between a text telephone and a ToIP gateway. At the top is a 'ToIP application' block. Below it, on the left, is a 'Signal converter' block connected to a 'Telephony interface'. On the right is a stack of IP networking functions: 'Codecs (audio and VBD)', 'RFC 2833', 'SSE protocol (opt.)', 'T.140 encode', 'Annex E', 'IP-TLP (SPRT opt.)', 'RTP', and 'UDP/IP'. The 'ToIP application' has bidirectional arrows connecting to each of these IP networking blocks. The 'Signal converter' has a bidirectional arrow to the 'ToIP application'. The 'UDP/IP' block has a bidirectional arrow to the 'IP network' at the bottom. A reference 'V.151(06)_F6-1' is noted at the bottom right.](042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg) + +Figure 6-1: ToIP gateway reference model. This block diagram shows the interaction between a text telephone and a ToIP gateway. At the top is a 'ToIP application' block. Below it, on the left, is a 'Signal converter' block connected to a 'Telephony interface'. On the right is a stack of IP networking functions: 'Codecs (audio and VBD)', 'RFC 2833', 'SSE protocol (opt.)', 'T.140 encode', 'Annex E', 'IP-TLP (SPRT opt.)', 'RTP', and 'UDP/IP'. The 'ToIP application' has bidirectional arrows connecting to each of these IP networking blocks. The 'Signal converter' has a bidirectional arrow to the 'ToIP application'. The 'UDP/IP' block has a bidirectional arrow to the 'IP network' at the bottom. A reference 'V.151(06)\_F6-1' is noted at the bottom right. + +**Figure 6-1 – ToIP gateway reference model** + +# 7 Connection and network scenarios + +Figure 7-1 below provides a reference diagram which matches that of Figure 5-1. It adds the concepts that a Text Telephone may be connected via a PSTN telephone or an IP telephone as well through acoustic couplers. + +![Figure 7-1: Reference diagram for a Text-over-IP network architecture. This diagram illustrates various connection scenarios. A central oval represents 'One or more IP network(s)'. Four 'IP endpoint (IP phone)' icons are connected to this network. 'Interconnect #1' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone' to a 'PSTN phone', which then connects to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. 'Interconnect #2' connects another 'PSTN phone' to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. 'Interconnect #3' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone (TTY/TDD)' to an 'IP endpoint (IP phone)' via 'Acoustic coupling'. 'Interconnect #4' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone' to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. A 'Native IP text telephone' is also shown as an 'IP endpoint' within the IP network. A reference 'V.151(06)_F7-1' is noted at the bottom right.](08441fa90c5fd11994626f662ac13f19_img.jpg) + +Figure 7-1: Reference diagram for a Text-over-IP network architecture. This diagram illustrates various connection scenarios. A central oval represents 'One or more IP network(s)'. Four 'IP endpoint (IP phone)' icons are connected to this network. 'Interconnect #1' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone' to a 'PSTN phone', which then connects to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. 'Interconnect #2' connects another 'PSTN phone' to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. 'Interconnect #3' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone (TTY/TDD)' to an 'IP endpoint (IP phone)' via 'Acoustic coupling'. 'Interconnect #4' connects a 'PSTN-based text telephone' to an 'IP endpoint (IP media gateway)'. A 'Native IP text telephone' is also shown as an 'IP endpoint' within the IP network. A reference 'V.151(06)\_F7-1' is noted at the bottom right. + +**Figure 7-1 – Reference diagram for a Text-over-IP network architecture** + +Interconnect #1 is an acoustic coupling between a PTP device to an analogue PSTN phone. Interconnect #2 is the connection between the PSTN phone that is acoustically coupled to the PTP device. The IP gateway connected at the interconnect #2 point shall support the transmission of text signals from the end PTP device using this Recommendation. + +Interconnect #3 is an acoustic coupling of a PTP device to an IP endpoint (e.g., an IP phone). The support of the transport of the PTP signals over IP in this interconnect is described in Annex D. + +Interconnect #4 is the direct interconnection of a PTP device to a gateway via the PSTN or other time division multiplexing (TDM) network (e.g., an enterprise TDM network). The IP gateway connect at the interconnect #4 point shall support the transmission of text signals from the end PTP device using this Recommendation. + +## **7.1 Service and performance requirements for ToIP** + +#### **7.1.1 Applicability of [ITU-T F.703] to ToIP** + +[ITU-T F.703] describes the end-user performance requirements for PTP devices operating in the PSTN. Gateways compliant to this Recommendation, when inserted between two end PTP devices, should be designed to maintain the user experience as defined in [ITU-T F.703]. + +#### **7.1.2 Gateway performance** + +In order to maintain the end-user performance to that specified in [ITU-T F.703], gateways should consider the appropriate design and use of: + +- modulator/demodulators; +- jitter buffer operation and jitter buffer sizes; +- fault-tolerant schemes to compensate for IP network impairments when appropriate. Fault-tolerant schemes that should be used include [IETF RFC 2198] redundancy, [IETF RFC 2733] FEC, or SPRT; +- minimizing delay through gateway while maintaining performance related to character loss. + +The performance of ToIP can be dependent upon the performance of the IP network connecting the two gateways. Gateways compliant to this Recommendation should utilize supplementary fault-tolerance schemes in order to meet the performance requirements given the network conditions that they are operating under. In environments with network QoS that does not achieve the end-to-end performance requirements, there is a need to supplement text telephone connections with fault-tolerance schemes such as [IETF RFC 2198] redundancy, [IETF RFC 2733] FEC, or SPRT. + +#### **7.1.3 Support of simultaneous voice and text** + +[ITU-T V.18] describes the application of [ITU-T V.61] for the simultaneous transmission of voice and text. The support of this mode of operation is for further study. + +#### **7.1.4 Interoperability of various text telephone types** + +PTP devices can use one of a number of modulations and character encodings as described in [ITU-T V.18]. This Recommendation makes allowances for the interconnection of PTP devices that utilize different modulations and/or character encodings through the use of text relay. As described further in clause 20, if the gateways support the modulation of their local PTP devices, the connection may result in use of Text Relay mode achieving protocol conversion scenario. If the connection results in use of VBD mode for PTP signal transport, the PTP devices must have a common capability or else the connection will not be established between the PTP devices. + +### **7.2 Audio and text functionality** + +Many PTP schemes on the PSTN support alternating between voice and text during the call. For the hearing impaired, a common use scenario of PTP is for the hearing-impaired user to speak to the + +remote user but receive responses using text telephony. Another common use scenario of PTP for persons with a speech disability is to use text telephony to transmit while receiving voice responses. Other scenarios include interactive voice response (IVR) systems where network voice announcements may be preceded by a short burst of text, with the voice announcement followed by a longer burst of text telephony. For all PTP types, alternation between text and voice is bidirectional; i.e., there will never be text in one direction while speech is being sent in the other direction. Systems that are constant carrier-based will drop carrier during portions of the call that speech is being sent. Systems that are not based on constant carrier for text will alternate between text spurts and speech spurts during the call. + +This Recommendation provides support for alternating between voice and text spurts as long as both end-point PTPs are operating in a mode that supports voice and text. + +#### **7.2.1 Interactive voice response system support** + +In interactive voice response (IVR) applications that support text telephony, the IVR system will generate voice and text announcements to the end user. The end user may generate DTMF signals in response to these voice and/or text announcements. Gateways that are compliant to [ITU-T V.151] shall support IVR applications which include text signalling as described in this clause. + +For support of IVR, a gateway shall enable its DTMF receiver processing concurrently with the ToIP support. If a DTMF digit is received while the gateway is regenerating a text message, the gateway shall signal this DTMF digit to the remote gateway using the pre-negotiated method for DTMF signalling across the IP network (e.g., voice encoded or [IETF RFC 2833]) while continuing to play out all the remaining text of the message out the PSTN link. + +Since DTMF ToIP is supported using normal DTMF signalling methods across the IP network, the gateway shall be able to support DTMF text-based IVR applications without any additional procedures. + +## **8 Transport methods** + +This clause provides an overview of the transport modes with which a ToIP gateway could be operating. Gateways that are compliant to this Recommendation shall support ToIP utilizing either text relay or VBD mode. + +## **8.1 Audio mode** + +In this mode, the channel processes speech signals. This mode may include the use of compression algorithms and other processing functions that are not suitable for the transport of text telephony signals. This mode of operation may be considered suitable for the purposes of transporting text telephony signals if the speech processing is benign to those signals. Depending upon the QoS of the network, the use of fault-tolerant mechanisms such as FEC and redundancy may be appropriate. + +Gateways operating per this Recommendation shall not use Audio mode for the transport of text telephony signals. + +## **8.2 VBD mode** + +Voice Band Data mode (VBD) of operation is defined in [ITU-T V.152]. VBD mode is suitable for the transport of text telephony signals. Depending upon the QoS of the network the use of fault-tolerant mechanisms such as FEC and redundancy may be appropriate. + +Since VBD mode is also suitable for the transport of non-text signals (e.g., speech), gateways may choose to stay in VBD mode for the duration of the call after the transition to ToIP, including possibly periods of speech interspersed with the text telephony signals. Gateways negotiate the capability to leave VBD mode during call set-up procedures as defined in clause 15.1.2. If the + +negotiation of this operation fails, gateways shall not transition out of VBD mode when PTP signals are no longer present (see clause 8.4.4). + +A V.151-compliant gateway may use VBD mode for the transport of PTP signals for the following conditions: + +- 1) The PTP signal modulation detected is one that is not supported for text relay by both gateways. +- 2) Probing sequence timeouts as specified in clause 20. + +Since VBD mode provides a transport of the PTP signals without the demodulation of these signals, interworking of dissimilar PTP types (i.e., protocol conversion) is not supported when using VBD mode. + +## **8.3 Text relay mode** + +Text relay mode of operation is characterized by the termination of the text telephone physical layer function at the gateway and the transport of the text characters between gateways. + +Text relay gateways demodulate the text telephony signals and present the user data to the gateway's ToIP application. The format of this data can be variable. This user data is then encoded as defined by [ITU-T T.140]. Once the characters are encoded, they may be relayed over the IP network using a suitable transport protocol (i.e., an IP Transport Layer Protocol, IP-TLP). The default IP-TLP for this Recommendation is defined in Annex E. Depending upon the QoS of the network the use of fault-tolerant mechanisms (redundancy and/or FEC) may be appropriate. The optional use of SPRT as defined in [ITU-T V.150.1] as the IP-TLP is also supported by this Recommendation. + +#### **8.3.1 Supported modes in text relay** + +FDX text telephony modes are those modes that have a constant carrier present. For V.18 modes, FDX modes supported by this Recommendation include: + +- a) ITU V.18 text telephony utilizing V.21 modulation. +- b) Bell 103 based text telephony modems. +- c) ITU V.23 Videotex terminals ("Minitel"). +- d) ITU V.21 encoded per ITU T.50. + +HDX-based text telephony modes do not have a carrier present while not transmitting text. For V.18 modes, HDX modes supported by this Recommendation include: + +- EDT (European Deaf Telephone) utilizing V.21 frequencies at 110 bit/s; +- 5-bit FSK Baudot terminals at 45.45 bit/s or at 50 bit/s. + +Gateways shall support one or more of the modes specified above using text relay. The modes supported by the gateway shall be advertised in the call signalling protocols as described in their appropriate annexes. If the gateway only supports a single mode for text relay, this mode should be a mode that is commonly used in the region in which the gateway is deployed. + +DTMF is used for text telephony in some PTP devices in addition to other purposes for DTMF (e.g., address signalling, control of voice mail). DTMF is not supported as a text relay method by gateways following this Recommendation. DTMF is supported by using normal DTMF transport over IP schemes as described in clause 12. DTMF support using text relay and interoperability of DTMF PTP devices with PTP devices that are currently supported using text relay is for further study. + +### **8.4 Switching between transport modes** + +This clause describes the requirements for switching between the transport modes described above. + +For alternating text and voice, text shall be given priority. The gateway shall use text mode as long as there is text to be transmitted and played out. + +When the gateway is in connection with an HDX text telephone, voice can be conveyed between bursts of text without further consideration. + +When the gateway is in connection with an FDX-based text telephone, detection of a drop in carrier from the text telephone shall cause the gateway to also drop the carrier and go to voice mode. Detection of carrier again, or text arriving from the IP side shall cause the gateway to start sending carrier again and entering text mode. Reception of a command between the gateways for changing mode to voice may cause the gateway to change mode to voice. + +#### **8.4.1 Payload type indication method** + +The default method for switching between transport modes is using RTP payload types to indicate a transition from one mode to another. + +For SPRT, the payload type field in the SPRT header can be used for indication of a media switch to SPRT. + +A gateway can initiate a switch to a new transport mode (initiator gateway) by generating packets encoded in the new transport mode and using the payload type indicating the transport mode being switched to. The initiator gateway will then discard incoming packets that arrive that do not use the new payload type encoding. These packets may be received until the remote gateway receives the new payload type encoding and switches to the new transport mode. The remote gateway (responder gateway), upon receiving packets with the new payload type, will immediately transition to the new transport mode and generate packets (if required) using the new encoding and proper payload type. + +#### **8.4.2 SSE method** + +State signalling event (SSE) protocol may optionally be used to control transitions between transport methods. Use of SSE protocol for transport mode transitions is determined at call set-up through the gateways indicating the capability of SSEs. If both gateways indicate the SSE capability, SSEs shall be used to control the transition of transport methods. If either gateway does not indicate SSE capability, the default method of payload type indication shall be used. + +The optional SSE protocol is given in Annex C of [ITU-T V.150.1]. For the purposes of ToIP, the accepted media states used are audio, voice band data (VBD), text relay probing and text relay. + +When the SSE protocol is being used, the optional Reason Identifier Code (RIC) field in the SSE payload shall be sent and filled in with the appropriate code. + +#### **8.4.3 Transitioning to ToIP transport** + +This clause provides the requirements at the gateway when transitioning to a non-audio transport mode that will be used to carry the text telephony signal over the IP network. + +The ToIP gateway should minimize as much as possible the leakage (audio encoding) of the PTP signals into the IP network. If more than 50% of a bit of a character is leaked into the IP network, an extraneous character may be generated to the remote PTP device. + +To minimize the possibility of an erroneous character due to signal leakage in audio mode, the regenerating gateway should wait one character time from the onset of the possible leakage to regenerate the character. Silence may be generated when the gateway introduces this delay. + +The first character received on the PSTN interface of the gateway shall be transmitted only once to the IP network, i.e., it shall not be lost nor erroneously repeated by the gateway. + +#### **8.4.4 Transitioning from ToIP transport** + +Upon detection of loss of carrier or other signal event indicating that the local PTP device is no longer in the connected state, the gateways shall initiate a transition out of text relay mode and into audio mode. For payload type switching protocol, the gateways shall encode incoming signals using the RTP audio encoding. For the SSE protocol, the gateway shall initiate a switch to Audio mode by generating an SSE(AUDIO) to the remote gateway. + +When a gateway detects that the remote gateway has initiated a switch out of text relay mode and into audio mode, it shall drop carrier with its local PTP device (if carrier is still being generated by the gateway) and transition to audio mode transport. + +#### **8.4.5 Modulation support scenarios for text relay** + +To be compliant with this Recommendation, a gateway shall support full physical layer modulation/demodulation for at least one of the modes used by PTP devices as described in clause 8.3.1. The gateway shall also support the detection of signals used for all the PTP modulations listed in clause 8.3.1. This detection capability is used by the call discrimination procedures for the initiation of transitioning to VBD mode so that VBD can be used between the PTP devices even if the modulation is not fully supported by the gateway. + +The transition to text relay not only depends on the modulation being supported by the local gateway and PTP device, but also on the modulation supported by the remote gateway and the modulation used by the remote PTP device; in other words, even though the local gateway and the local PTP support the same modulation, text relay might not be the mode that is used. VBD could be the mode decided on instead. The call discrimination procedures defined in clause 20 use the knowledge of the modulations supported by both gateways and the signals observed from the PTP devices in determining whether text relay can be used. The overall goal of the call discrimination procedures is to ensure connectivity of the PTP devices with the use of text relay as the secondary goal. + +In the case where the PTP devices do not support a common modulation, the call discrimination procedures may still result in the use of text relay mode if the gateways do support their local PTP modulations. This scenario is what is referred to as protocol conversion throughout this Recommendation. + +Since the optional SSE protocol includes the mandatory indication of the signals that are being detected which caused the SSE to be generated, call discrimination procedures that use SSE will have additional flexibility resulting in more cases of using text relay in protocol conversion scenarios. + +## **9 ToIP operational modes** + +PTP signals shall either be carried using VBD mode or Text Relay mode. The call discrimination procedures defined in clause 20 define how the gateways shall transition from audio mode to either VBD or text relay mode when PTP signals are present. In the case where text relay mode is used, there still might be a stage where VBD is used during the call discrimination phase. + +The call discrimination procedures will guarantee that PTP devices will communicate if they are able to communicate over a PSTN connection, either through the preferred mode of text relay or using the fallback VBD mode. Additionally, the call discrimination procedures may result in the use of text relay mode to allow for connectivity of PTP devices that would not normally connect in a PSTN connection through the use of protocol conversion. + +## **10 Text Relay PHY layer operation** + +This clause describes the functionality and expected behaviour of the Text Relay PHY. The PHY in this context is defined as the physical layer of the PSTN text telephone to gateway connection and does not include the IP physical layer. + +The goal of ToIP is to ensure connectivity of analogue PSTN text telephony terminals on IP networks. This Recommendation does not require nor preclude the use of non-standard mechanisms. The ToIP procedures take into account that there are two independent PSTN connections to be established in order to provide a single end-to-end connection of the end-point text telephony terminals. The establishment of the text telephone physical layer consists of two stages. The first stage involves call discrimination including the detection and discrimination of the text telephony signals on the PSTN interface of the gateway. The second stage involves the establishment of the physical layer connection between the gateway and the text telephony terminal. The procedures that define this process are described in clause 20. + +The overall connection physical layer may be selectively transported in either VBD or text relay. The call discrimination and mode selection procedures define the rules for this choice. + +Text relay supports the ability for each gateway to connect with text telephones using different modulation modes. This allows for the possible interoperability of dissimilar text telephony devices across the IP network, although there are some limitations to this mode of interoperation. It is also possible to match the modulations on each PSTN link if necessary. + +To aid the call discrimination process, gateways exchange their preference for call discrimination and their supported modulation capability set. This exchange happens during call set-up using signalling mechanisms. + +The call discrimination procedures include mechanisms that attempt to match the modulation used on each PSTN call leg. This is not guaranteed, though, so differing modulations and differing signalling rates may result. In the case that the signalling rates differ on each PSTN call leg in text relay mode, buffer management and flow control may be required; Appendix IV provides relevant information on text buffering and transmission. + +# **11 IP transport for text relay** + +This Recommendation assumes that the IP protocol conforms to the following standards: [IETF RFC 791], [IETF RFC 950], [IETF RFC 919] and [IETF RFC 920]. This Recommendation does not impact any IP network topology, IP packet distribution and routing protocols, which are independent of this Recommendation. + +The default IP Transport Layer Protocol for this Recommendation shall be the protocol defined in Annex E. Optionally, the simple packet transport protocol (SPRT) as defined in Annex B of [ITU-T V.150.1] may be used if mutually negotiated. The use of other IP transport protocols is for further study. + +Since Annex E specifies transport of T.140-encoded data on RTP, it inherits the same reliability characteristics of any RTP media stream. Improved transport reliability may be achieved by utilizing [IETF RFC 2198] (Redundancy) and or [IETF RFC 2733] (Forward Error Correction). The use of these is optional but encouraged. Appendix III provides guidance for the use of [IETF RFC 2198] and [IETF RFC 2733]. + +If using RTP for text relay transport, audio/t140c media type shall be supported by the gateway. Use of text/t140 media type for interoperability with non-V.151 devices that also use text/t140 is for further study. + +[IETF RFC 2198] (RTP redundancy) shall be implemented by gateways compliant to this Recommendation. [IETF RFC 2733] (RTP FEC) and SPRT may also be implemented by the gateway. Use of one or more of these mechanisms during a ToIP session is required if network conditions are such that acceptable performance cannot be achieved without them. Appendix III provides guidance on the use of [IETF RFC 2198]. + +## **11.1 Single and dual port operation of text relay** + +Text relay packets shall be transmitted in the IP network on the same UDP port used for non text-relay packet (e.g., voice). Transmission of text relay packets on a separate UDP port is for further study. + +## **11.2 Text relay throughput** + +Gateways compliant to this Recommendation shall support PTPs operating at their full character speed. + +Characters received by the gateway from the PTP shall be transmitted to the IP network character by character. Characters should be sent into the IP network by the receiving gateway without delay. In the case that flow control is required (e.g., to honour the IP network character per second (CPS) value provided by the remote gateway through external signalling), some buffering of the character data before transmission into the IP or PSTN network may be required. + +Appendix IV provides information on how a gateway should handle buffering for the case when different signalling rates are used on the different PSTN call legs. + +## **12 Support of DTMF in ToIP** + +PTP devices that utilize DTMF tones to transmit characters as per Annex B of [ITU-T V.18] are supported by this Recommendation. DTMF tones should be carried in the IP network using [IETF RFC 2833], but may be supported using *UserInputIndication* H.245 messages for systems based on [ITU-T H.245]. Since DTMF PTP is only supported through the transmission of DTMF digits through the IP network without the discrimination of PTP DTMF digits from DTMF digits used for other purposes during the call (e.g., voice mail control, IVR), both end PTP devices must operate in DTMF mode for the end-to-end PTP connection to work. + +# **13 Transition out of text relay** + +A gateway receiving PTP signals shall initiate a switch to audio mode from text relay mode upon detection of loss of carrier. A gateway may implement a silence guard time between detection of loss of carrier and the initiation of a switch to audio mode to avoid multiple mode transitions in the case of two closely-timed text spurts. This silence guard time is recommended to be between 700 and 1000 ms. If non-carrier signals are detected in this guard time, the gateway should immediately initiate a switch to audio mode. + +For payload type switching, the gateway transitions to audio by encoding signals using the audio encoding and audio payload type. + +For the SSE protocol, the gateway will generate an SSE(AUDIO) to the remote gateway to initiate the switch to audio mode (see clause 20). + +The remote gateway, upon detecting the switch to audio mode initiated by the local gateway, shall stop generating carrier and transition to audio encoding, generating acknowledgement SSE(AUDIO) if SSE protocol is being used. + +## **14 T.140 encoding of text relay** + +Annex E requires the encoding of all text data using [ITU-T T.140]. For consistency and ensuring compatibility, all transport of text, whether it uses RTP, SPRT or some other IP-TLP, shall use [ITU-T T.140]. + +### **14.1 Character set support** + +Gateways compliant with this Recommendation shall support 7-bit T.50 characters and 5-bit characters in Annex A of [ITU-T V.18] if the associated PTP mode is supported by the gateway for text relay. If the character set is supported, the gateway shall have the capability of mapping the T.50 or V.18 Annex A character set to T.140 upon demodulation of the PTP signal. The gateway shall also support the mapping of T.140 to T.50 or V.18 Annex A when remodulating the signal to the local PTP device. The mapping of the 5-bit character codes to 7-bit T.50 characters is described in Annex A of [ITU-T V.18]. + +For PTP modes that utilizes a character set other than T.50 or V.18 Annex A, issues may arise between mapping of certain national characters to a character set other than the PTP's character set. This may lead to the inability to map characters correctly for the case when using protocol conversion between two different national PTP modes. Mapping between national character sets is not addressed in [ITU-T V.18]. Support of character sets other than T.50 and 5-bit characters in Annex A of [ITU-T V.18] and for mapping between national character sets is for further study. + +### **14.2 TIA-825A and T.50 encoding requirements** + +These requirements are required for gateways that support TIA-825A and T.50 Text telephones. + +For the case where a gateway is receiving text data from a peer gateway which in turn is connected to a TIA-825A or T.50 Text telephone and if for some reason that gateway detects the loss of a character in the packet network (e.g., due to congestion or packet loss) then it shall use the apostrophe character to replace the missed character if no other mechanisms for determining the lost character value are used. Also, if the T.140 lost character (0xFFFF hexadecimal) is received, then it too shall be translated to an apostrophe when playing out the character to a TIA-825A or T.50 receiver. + +Note that [ITU-T T.140] specifies that the 'new line' character is encoded as 0x2028 hexadecimal. If received by a gateway from a peer gateway and it is to be encoded to TIA-825A or T.50, the character shall be encoded as the two characters 'CR' 'LF' (Carriage Return and Line Feed). + +## **15 Gateway-to-gateway protocol definitions and procedures** + +### **15.1 Gateway capability and call set-up messages** + +This clause defines the functionality of the messages that are exchanged between gateways during the call set-up phase. These definitions are used by the following protocols: Annex G of [ITU-T H.323], [ITU-T H.245] and SIP/SDP. The values shown in this set of messages represent what should be functionally indicated by the signalling protocol. + +#### 15.1.1 Text telephone modulation support + +A list of the modulations supported in text relay mode by the gateway is shown in Table 15-1. Gateways compliant to this Recommendation shall advertise the support for at least one of these modulations. + +**Table 15-1 – PTP modulations** + +| Modulation | Description | +|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| V18 | V.18 "native mode" V.21 modulation | +| BELL103 | Bell 103 based PTP modems (Annex D of [ITU-T V.18]) | +| V23 | Videotext terminals ("Minitel"; see Annex E of [ITU-T V.18]) | +| V21 | V.21 encoded per [ITU-T T.50] (Annex F of [ITU-T V.18]) | +| EDT | European Deaf Telephone utilizing V.21 frequencies at 110 bit/s (Annex C of [ITU-T V.18]) | +| TIA825 | Baudot terminals at 45.45 bit/s or at 50 bit/s (Annex A of [ITU-T V.18]) | + +#### 15.1.2 Remain in VBD preference + +This capability indicates the preference of the gateway to switch out of VBD mode when text signals are no longer present when using VBD for text transport. Both gateways must indicate this preference for it to be used in the call. Table 15-2 shows the valid values for VBD mode preference. + +**Table 15-2 – VBD mode preference** + +| VBD mode preference | Description | +|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| False (default) | Stay in VBD mode for the duration of the call. | +| True | Switch back to AUDIO mode when text signals are no longer present. | + +#### 15.1.3 Characters per second (CPS) + +This optional parameter is an indication of the maximum number of characters per second that may be received in a session. If this parameter is not received by a gateway during the signalling of the call, a value of 30 shall be used. Gateways shall utilize this parameter to implement flow control with their local PTP device so as not to exceed transmission of characters into the IP network at a rate higher than indicated. + +#### 15.1.4 VBD parameters + +The specification of the VBD parameters is found in [ITU-T V.152]. + +#### 15.1.5 SSE parameters + +If the optional SSE protocol is to be used, parameters are signalled as per clause E.1.3 of [ITU-T V.150.1] for SDP and clause F.6 of [ITU-T V.150.1] for H.245. To use the SSE protocol instead of the default payload type switching protocol for mode control, both gateways must signal the support for all of the SSE event encodings defined in Table 15-3. + +**Table 15-3 – Required SSE event encodings** + +| Event encoding
(Decimal)
| Indicated media state | +|-------------------------------------|------------------------------| +| 1 | Initial Audio | +| 2 | Voice Band Data (VBD) | +| 5 | Text Relay | +| 6 | Text Relay Probing | + +#### 15.1.6 SPRT parameters + +If the optional IP-TLP SPRT is to be used, then the following parameters are required to be indicated: + +Maximum payload size of SPRT channels 0 to 2, and maximum window size for SPRT channels 1 and 2. SPRT channel 3 shall not be used, so no configuration of it is required. + +## 15.2 Gateway call discrimination messages + +#### 15.2.1 SSE reason identifier codes + +Reason Identifier Codes to be used with the optional SSE protocol are defined in Table 12 of [ITU-T V.150.1]. The appropriate SSE RIC shall be sent with the SSE messages when the SSE protocol has been successfully negotiated between the gateways. + +# 16 Start-up mode of operation + +ToIP gateways will need to co-exist with other "over-IP" mechanisms. (For example Voice over IP, Facsimile over IP, and Modem over IP.) The entry into Text over IP mode corresponding to the beginning of the call discrimination procedures defined in clause 20 happens when certain signals are detected while the gateway is operating in Voice over IP mode. Text over IP mode may also be entered from the Modem over IP (V.150.1) call discrimination procedures as described in clause 16.1. + +### 16.1 Inter-relationship with V.150.1 + +If V.150.1 support is implemented and successfully negotiated by the gateway (in addition to V.151 support), text relay mode as described in this Recommendation shall be entered into using the SSE protocol procedures as described in clause 18 of [ITU-T V.150.1] for supported PTP types that utilize answer tones. For supported PTP types that do not use answer tones, the procedures defined in this Recommendation shall be used. + +## 16.2 Inter-relation with V.152 + +If V.152 support is implemented and successfully negotiated by the gateway (in addition to V.151 support) and V.150.1 support is not successfully negotiated or implemented by the gateway, the procedures described in this Recommendation shall take precedence over those defined in [ITU-T V.152] for signal stimuli that represents V.151 text relay mode supported PTP types. For + +non-PTP signal stimuli that would initiate use of VBD operation, procedures defined in [ITU-T V.152] shall be used. + +# **17 Voiceband data modem interworking requirements** + +Certain PTP modes are indistinguishable from voiceband data applications. Examples of this include PTP modes that utilize V.21 and V.23 modulations. Call discrimination procedures defined in clause 20 have been designed so that if both end devices are voiceband data modems that use such modulations, the connection will result in use of text relay between the two end modems if V.151 text relay using these modulations is supported by both gateways. If either gateway does not support the modulation for text relay, the connection will result in VBD mode between the two gateways. + +In the case that the connection results in text relay, the modem data will be encoded utilizing T.140 encoding. Data integrity between the end modems will be ensured as long as the data modems are using 8-bit character sizes (including parity). For other character sizes, the data will be corrupted due to the assumption that the data is encoded using T.140. + +So as not to corrupt the data in the case that text relay mode is used for voiceband data modems, the CPS (character per second) value advertised by the gateway in the call signalling parameters should be greater than or equal to the highest signalling rate for all modulations supported by the gateway. + +## **18 Facsimile interworking requirements** + +Facsimile uses similar signals to those used by certain PTP devices, including V.8 start-up sequence and answer tone. If ToIP is supported for modulations that use signals also used for facsimile, the procedures defined in this Recommendation may be exited and facsimile processing procedures entered (e.g., relay or VBD) upon detection of the signal being generated by a facsimile instead of a PTP. Examples of these detection events include recognition of the CM call function as indicating facsimile, or the existence of a V.21 flag sequence. + +## **19 Call set-up procedures** + +The call set-up procedures are defined in Annexes B and C of this Recommendation and in Annex G of [ITU-T H.323]. + +## **20 Call discrimination procedures** + +The following clause defines the procedures to be used by a ToIP gateway during the call discrimination phase of the connection. The call discrimination phase starts when text telephony signals are first present on the PSTN interface of either gateway. The call discrimination phase ends when end-to-end connectivity using V.151 is established between the two terminal PTP devices. + +### **20.1 V.8 *bis* processing** + +In all operating modes (e.g., audio, VBD), ToIP gateways shall monitor and detect V.8 *bis* dual tone on the PSTN link and prevent further V.8 *bis* signals from being transmitted into the IP network, thereby disabling V.8 *bis* protocol between the PTP devices. The support of V.8 *bis* by the PTP devices is for further study. + +### **20.2 V.8 CI/XCI processing** + +V.8 CI/XCI signals can be carried in audio mode or, optionally, cause initiation of a transition to VBD mode. If CI/XCI is carried in voice mode, there is a probability that the CI/XCI will not successfully be detected by the remote PTP. This misdetection is due to the possible corruption of the signal by the voice codec and other signal processing distortions implicit in voice mode. + +[ITU-T V.8] does not treat CI/XCI as reliable signals (i.e., V.8 allows for the loss or non-transmission of CI/XCI in the protocol definition), so carriage of these signals using voice mode is acceptable. If CI/XCI is not detected properly by the remote PTP device, there can be up to an additional 3 seconds of delay for the ANSam tone generation relative to the case where CI/XCI is detected. + +## 20.3 Call discrimination overview + +Gateways compliant to this Recommendation shall transport PTP signals that they are capable of detecting and discriminating using either text relay transport or VBD transport. Text relay is the preferred mode of transport for the support PTP signals with VBD the fallback mode of transport. The fallback to VBD may occur because the end-to-end establishment of a PTP connection was not possible due to the lack of support of the local PTP modulation type at one or both of the gateways, or the inability to negotiate to text relay mode based on the procedures defined in this clause. + +Appendix II provides flow diagrams of example call discrimination scenarios that are useful in understanding the call discrimination procedures described in this clause. These call flows are examples only. The text and SDL diagrams provided in this clause provide the normative description of the call discrimination for ToIP. + +Depending on the type of modulation supported by the PTPs and the gateways, this Recommendation supports several call discrimination procedures. + +A gateway that supports a subset of the V.18 PTP modulations may scale down the procedures defined in this clause. The scaled-down procedures will fully support text relay for the modulations supported by the gateway, with VBD support for those modulations not supported by the gateway. + +## 20.4 Call discrimination SDL diagrams + +This clause provides the SDL processing description for the procedures defined by the call discrimination call flows as described in Appendix II. + +The SDL diagrams define the procedures at the gateway for call discrimination processing. These SDL diagrams are derived from the call discrimination call flows given in Appendix II. The symbols used in the SDL diagrams are defined in Figure 20-1 below. + +![Figure 20-1 – SDL diagram definition. This diagram defines the symbols used in SDL diagrams. It includes: a 'Start' symbol (a rounded rectangle with a semi-circular end on the left), a 'procedure call' symbol (a rectangle with double vertical lines on the left and right sides), a 'received IP message' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed right side), a 'sent IP message' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed left side), a 'state' symbol (a rounded rectangle), a 'received signal processing primitive' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed right side and double vertical lines on the left), a 'sent signal processing primitive' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed left side and double vertical lines on the right), and a 'decision' symbol (a diamond shape). The text 'V.151(06)_F20-1' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.](9167fa5ebcb66516d1bbb421ec9bba7b_img.jpg) + +Figure 20-1 – SDL diagram definition. This diagram defines the symbols used in SDL diagrams. It includes: a 'Start' symbol (a rounded rectangle with a semi-circular end on the left), a 'procedure call' symbol (a rectangle with double vertical lines on the left and right sides), a 'received IP message' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed right side), a 'sent IP message' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed left side), a 'state' symbol (a rounded rectangle), a 'received signal processing primitive' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed right side and double vertical lines on the left), a 'sent signal processing primitive' symbol (a rectangle with a pointed left side and double vertical lines on the right), and a 'decision' symbol (a diamond shape). The text 'V.151(06)\_F20-1' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +**Figure 20-1 – SDL diagram definition** + +#### 20.4.1 Detection of PTP signals + +Table 20-1 describes the signals that shall be detected by the gateway for the purpose of transitioning to either VBD or text relay mode per the SDLs. + +**Table 20-1 – Signal detection criteria** + +| Signal detected | Detected TTY mode | SSE RIC | +|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| +| 390-Hz tone for 1 second | V.23 Annex E of [ITU-T V.18] call mode | V.23 Low channel | +| 1300-Hz tone for 1 second | V.23 Annex E of [ITU-T V.18] answer mode | V.23 High channel | +| 980-Hz tone for 1 second | V.21 Annex F of [ITU-T V.18] call mode | V.21 Ch1 | +| 1650-Hz tone for 1 second | V.21 Annex F of [ITU-T V.18] answer mode | V.21 Ch2 | +| V.21 low-band modulated character, 110 bit/s | EDT Annex C of [ITU-T V.18] | V.21 Ch1 | +| 1270-Hz tone for 1 second | Bell 103 Annex D of [ITU-T V.18] call mode | Bell 103 modem | +| 1400-Hz mark, 1800-Hz space FSK signals | Baudot Annex A of [ITU-T V.18] | TIA-825A (50 bit/s)
TIA-825A (45.45 bit/s) | + +A PTP conforming to Annex C of [ITU-T V.18] can send a 980-Hz tone for 1 second after the last character transmitted in a burst of characters. Since, in this case, the 980-Hz tone follows a valid character sequence that indicates Annex C of [ITU-T V.18], the gateway should not use this signal to incorrectly designate the PTP as an Annex F of [ITU-T V.18] PTP. + +The Bell 103 high-band mark tone (2225 Hz) is treated the same as ANS in the call discrimination procedures, not as a PTP mark tone. This is because a Bell 212 data modem connection will start out with a 2225-Hz tone as well, but a 1270-Hz tone will never be received, so the connection should stay in VBD. + +The 1300-Hz V.23 mark should not be confused with a calling tone using the same frequency (duration of 0.5-0.7 s on). Implementations shall take care not to initiate transitions to VBD/text relay based on a calling tone. + +Further details on the requirements for the detection of PTP characters for the purpose of mode transitions are given in clause 8.4.3. + +#### 20.4.2 SDL state variables + +The SDLs make use of the *tty\_mode* state variable to track the PTP modulation type detected by the gateway. This state variable is local to each gateway and is initialized to "unknown" at the start of the procedures. + +#### 20.4.3 Payload type switching SDL diagrams + +The following SDL diagrams define the procedures at the gateway for call discrimination processing when using payload type switching. These SDL diagrams are derived from the call discrimination call flows given in Appendix II. The symbols used in the SDL diagrams are defined in Figure 20-1. + +NOTE 1 – In the following diagrams (Figure 20-2) for payload type switching SDLs, the paths are only used when both gateways have indicated support for native V.18 text relay. + +![SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 1 of 6). It starts with a 'Start' terminal, followed by a process block 'tty_mode=unknown PT=audio', and ends with an 'audio' state terminal. The label V.151(06)_F05 is at the bottom right.](cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([Start]) --> Process[tty_mode=unknown +PT=audio] + Process --> audio([audio]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F05 + +SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 1 of 6). It starts with a 'Start' terminal, followed by a process block 'tty\_mode=unknown PT=audio', and ends with an 'audio' state terminal. The label V.151(06)\_F05 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 1 of 6)** + +![SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 2 of 6). It branches from an 'audio' state terminal into four parallel input paths. Path 1: CI/XCI input leads to a decision 'VBD preferred'. If 'yes', PT=VBD process block leads to VBD state; if 'no', audio state. Path 2: PT=VBD input leads to PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. Path 3: ANSam input leads to tty_mode=V.18 PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. Path 4: ANS input leads to tty_mode=FDX PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. The label V.151(06)_F06 is at the bottom right.](5a1abd59a95fa47ae192807de151e9eb_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + audio_in([audio]) --> Junction(( )) + Junction --> CI_XCI[/CI/XCI/] + Junction --> PT_VBD_in[/PT=VBD/] + Junction --> ANSam[/ANSam/] + Junction --> ANS[/ANS/] + + CI_XCI --> VBD_preferred{VBD +preferred} + VBD_preferred -- yes --> PT_VBD_proc1[PT=VBD] + PT_VBD_proc1 --> VBD1([VBD]) + VBD_preferred -- no --> audio_out([audio]) + + PT_VBD_in --> PT_VBD_proc2[PT=VBD] + PT_VBD_proc2 --> VBD2([VBD]) + + ANSam --> tty_mode_V18[tty_mode=V.18 +PT=VBD] + tty_mode_V18 --> VBD3([VBD]) + + ANS --> tty_mode_FDX[tty_mode=FDX +PT=VBD] + tty_mode_FDX --> VBD4([VBD]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F06 + +SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 2 of 6). It branches from an 'audio' state terminal into four parallel input paths. Path 1: CI/XCI input leads to a decision 'VBD preferred'. If 'yes', PT=VBD process block leads to VBD state; if 'no', audio state. Path 2: PT=VBD input leads to PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. Path 3: ANSam input leads to tty\_mode=V.18 PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. Path 4: ANS input leads to tty\_mode=FDX PT=VBD process block, then VBD state. The label V.151(06)\_F06 is at the bottom right. + +**Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 2 of 6)** + +![SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 3 of 6). The flowchart starts with four parallel inputs: 'HDX character (clause 20.4.3.1)', 'FDX answering carrier detect (clause 20.4.3.2)', 'PT=TR', and '2225 Hz'. Each input leads to a specific processing block. The 'HDX character' block leads to a decision 'G1 & G2 support modulation'. If 'no', it sets 'PT=VBD' and outputs 'VBD'. If 'yes', it sets 'PT=TR' and outputs 'PT=TR(CHAR)' then 'TR'. The 'FDX answering carrier detect' block sets 'tty_mode=FDX' and 'PT=VBD', outputting 'VBD'. The 'PT=TR' block connects with local PTP (clause 20.4.3.3), sets 'tty_mode=X' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The '2225 Hz' block sets 'tty_mode=FDX' and 'PT=VBD', outputting 'VBD'.](aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Input1[HDX character +(clause 20.4.3.1)] --> D1{G1 & G2 +support modulation} + Input2[FDX answering +carrier detect +(clause 20.4.3.2)] --> B1[tty_mode=FDX +PT=VBD] + Input3[PT=TR] --> B2[connect with +local PTP +(clause 20.4.3.3)] + Input4[2225 Hz] --> B3[tty_mode=FDX +PT=VBD] + + D1 -- no --> B4[PT=VBD] + D1 -- yes --> B5[PT=TR] + B4 --> O1([VBD]) + B5 --> B6[PT=TR(CHAR)] + B6 --> O2([TR]) + B1 --> O3([VBD]) + B2 --> B7[tty_mode=X +PT=TR] + B7 --> O4([TR]) + B3 --> O5([VBD]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F07 + +SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 3 of 6). The flowchart starts with four parallel inputs: 'HDX character (clause 20.4.3.1)', 'FDX answering carrier detect (clause 20.4.3.2)', 'PT=TR', and '2225 Hz'. Each input leads to a specific processing block. The 'HDX character' block leads to a decision 'G1 & G2 support modulation'. If 'no', it sets 'PT=VBD' and outputs 'VBD'. If 'yes', it sets 'PT=TR' and outputs 'PT=TR(CHAR)' then 'TR'. The 'FDX answering carrier detect' block sets 'tty\_mode=FDX' and 'PT=VBD', outputting 'VBD'. The 'PT=TR' block connects with local PTP (clause 20.4.3.3), sets 'tty\_mode=X' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The '2225 Hz' block sets 'tty\_mode=FDX' and 'PT=VBD', outputting 'VBD'. + +Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 3 of 6) + +![SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 4 of 6). The flowchart starts with a 'VBD' oval, which branches into four paths, each labeled with '[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]'. The first path leads to 'CM (w/ call function = text)', then a decision 'G1 & G2 support V.18 native'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty_mode=V.18' and outputs 'VBD'. The second path leads to 'end of JM (w/ call function = text)', then a decision 'G1 & G2 support V.18 native'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty_mode=V.18' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The third path leads to 'end of CJ', then a decision 'tty+mode=V.18'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty_mode=V.18' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The fourth path leads to 'PT=TR', then 'connect (clause 20.4.3.4)', then 'tty_mode=X' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'.](a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([VBD]) -- "[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]" --> B1[CM (w/ call +function = +text)] + Start -- "[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]" --> B2[end of JM (w/ +call function = +text)] + Start -- "[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]" --> B3[end of CJ] + Start -- "[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]" --> B4[PT=TR] + + B1 --> D1{G1 & G2 +support +V.18 native} + D1 -- no --> O1([VBD]) + D1 -- yes --> B5[tty_mode=V.18] + B5 --> O2([VBD]) + + B2 --> D2{G1 & G2 +support +V.18 native} + D2 -- no --> O3([VBD]) + D2 -- yes --> B6[tty_mode=V.18 +PT=TR] + B6 --> O4([TR]) + + B3 --> D3{tty+mode=V.18} + D3 -- no --> O5([VBD]) + D3 -- yes --> B7[tty_mode=V.18 +PT=TR] + B7 --> O6([TR]) + + B4 --> B8[connect +(clause 20.4.3.4)] + B8 --> B9[tty_mode=X +PT=TR] + B9 --> O7([TR]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F08CM + +SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 4 of 6). The flowchart starts with a 'VBD' oval, which branches into four paths, each labeled with '[§ 20.4.3 Note 1]'. The first path leads to 'CM (w/ call function = text)', then a decision 'G1 & G2 support V.18 native'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty\_mode=V.18' and outputs 'VBD'. The second path leads to 'end of JM (w/ call function = text)', then a decision 'G1 & G2 support V.18 native'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty\_mode=V.18' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The third path leads to 'end of CJ', then a decision 'tty+mode=V.18'. If 'no', it outputs 'VBD'; if 'yes', it sets 'tty\_mode=V.18' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. The fourth path leads to 'PT=TR', then 'connect (clause 20.4.3.4)', then 'tty\_mode=X' and 'PT=TR', outputting 'TR'. + +Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 4 of 6) + +![SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 5 of 6). The flow starts with an input 'modem X detected (clause 20.4.3.5)'. It proceeds to a decision 'tty_mode = V.18'. If 'yes', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'no', it proceeds to another decision 'tty_mode = FDX'. If 'yes', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'no', it proceeds to a third decision 'G1 & G2 support X'. If 'no', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'yes', it performs the task 'connect with PTP using X (clause 20.4.3.6)', then sets 'PT=TR'. It then sends an output 'PT=TR' while simultaneously executing the comment 'Send character in Text Relay packet if available (e.g. for HDX modems), otherwise send NULL'. Finally, it enters state 'TR'.](8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start(( )) --> A[/modem X +detected +(clause +20.4.3.5)/] + A --> B{tty_mode +=V.18} + B -- yes --> C([VBD]) + B -- no --> D{tty_mode +=FDX} + D -- yes --> C + D -- no --> E{G1 & G2 +support X} + E -- yes --> F[connect with +PTP using X +(clause 20.4.3.6)] + E -- no --> C + F --> G[PT=TR] + G --> H[/PT=TR/] + H --> I([TR]) + J[Send character +in Text Relay +packet if available +(e.g. for HDX modems), +otherwise send NULL] -.- H + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F09 + +SDL flowchart for payload type switching (sheet 5 of 6). The flow starts with an input 'modem X detected (clause 20.4.3.5)'. It proceeds to a decision 'tty\_mode = V.18'. If 'yes', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'no', it proceeds to another decision 'tty\_mode = FDX'. If 'yes', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'no', it proceeds to a third decision 'G1 & G2 support X'. If 'no', it transitions to state 'VBD'. If 'yes', it performs the task 'connect with PTP using X (clause 20.4.3.6)', then sets 'PT=TR'. It then sends an output 'PT=TR' while simultaneously executing the comment 'Send character in Text Relay packet if available (e.g. for HDX modems), otherwise send NULL'. Finally, it enters state 'TR'. + +**Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 5 of 6)** + +![Figure 20-2: SDL for payload type switching. The diagram shows a vertical flow: an oval labeled 'TR' points to a chevron-shaped box labeled 'carrier loss', which points to a rectangular box labeled 'PT=audio', which finally points to an oval labeled 'audio'. The text 'V.151(06)_F10' is located to the right of the 'audio' oval.](69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + TR([TR]) --> CL[/carrier loss/] + CL --> PT[PT=audio] + PT --> audio([audio]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F10 + +Figure 20-2: SDL for payload type switching. The diagram shows a vertical flow: an oval labeled 'TR' points to a chevron-shaped box labeled 'carrier loss', which points to a rectangular box labeled 'PT=audio', which finally points to an oval labeled 'audio'. The text 'V.151(06)\_F10' is located to the right of the 'audio' oval. + +**Figure 20-2 – SDL for payload type switching (sheet 6 of 6)** + +##### **20.4.3.1 HDX character** + +This event corresponds to the detection of an HDX PTP signal as per clause 20.4.1. + +##### **20.4.3.2 FDX answering carrier detect** + +This event corresponds to the detection of a carrier generated by an FDX PTP device as described in clause 20.4.1. + +##### **20.4.3.3 Connect with local PTP** + +This procedure box is entered when a TR payload type is received while the connection is in audio mode. This is the case when an HDX modulation has been detected by the remote gateway and both gateways support this HDX modulation. The gateway entering this procedure box shall attempt to connect with its local PTP device using an HDX modulation. + +##### **20.4.3.4 Connect** + +In this procedure box, the gateway shall attempt to connect with its local PTP device using modulations that it supports. The gateway should be able to connect to its local PTP device since the remote gateway would not have sent the TR payload unless the PTP modulation that it detected was also supported for text relay by the local gateway. It is assumed for this case that the PTP devices are compatible. + +The gateway shall perform the automode probing as defined in Figure 2b of [ITU-T V.18] and its corresponding text. The gateway shall not generate the ANSam signal at the beginning of these procedures, i.e., it shall skip over the generate ANSam block in Figure 2b of [ITU-T V.18] and go straight to the probing flows. The gateway shall only probe for modulations that it supports for text relay. + +In order to allow for data modem connections over text relay, the gateway shall probe for supported FDX modulations before probing for supported HDX modulations. + +##### **20.4.3.5 Modem X detected** + +This event corresponds to the detection of a PTP modulation as per clause 20.4.1. + +##### **20.4.3.6 Connect with PTP using X** + +The gateway shall connect with its local PTP device using the modulation detected and transition the channel to text relay mode through the generation of TR encoded RTP packets to the remote gateway. + +#### 20.4.4 SDL for SSE protocol + +The following SDL diagrams define the procedures at the gateway for call discrimination processing when using SSE protocol switching. These SDL diagrams are derived from the call discrimination call flows given in Appendix II. The symbols used in the SDL diagrams are defined in Figure 20-1. + +NOTE 1 – In the following diagrams (Figure 20-3) for SSE SDLs, the paths are only used when both gateways have indicated support for native V.18 text relay. + +![Figure 20-3 (sheet 1 of 10) is a simple SDL diagram. It starts with a 'Start' terminal, followed by a process block 'tty_mode=unknown', and ends with a data object 'a, a'. The label 'V.151(06)_F11' is at the bottom right.](dd5771673aececa53d42ece89218299d_img.jpg) + +``` +graph TD; Start([Start]) --> Process[tty_mode=unknown]; Process --> Data([a, a]); +``` + +V.151(06)\_F11 + +Figure 20-3 (sheet 1 of 10) is a simple SDL diagram. It starts with a 'Start' terminal, followed by a process block 'tty\_mode=unknown', and ends with a data object 'a, a'. The label 'V.151(06)\_F11' is at the bottom right. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol (sheet 1 of 10) + +![Figure 20-3 (sheet 2 of 10) is a complex SDL diagram starting from state 'a,a'. It branches into four main paths. Path 1: 'Start of CI/XCI' event leads to a decision 'VBD Preferred?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'SSE(VBD:CI/XCI)' and then 'v, a'. If 'No', it goes to 'a, a'. Path 2: 'SSE(TP:X)' event leads to 'start auto-mode/probing (clause 20.4.4.1)', then 'SSE(TP, p\')', and then 'tp, tp'. Path 3: 'end of CI/XCI' event leads to 'tty_type=V.18', then 'squellch TDM line', then 'SSE(TP, CI/XCI)', and then 'tp, a'. Path 4: 'SSE(VBD:X)' event leads to a decision diamond. A note points to this diamond: 'X=tty modulation not supported using text-relay by other gateway OR FDX and not supported by this gateway'. If 'yes', it goes to 'turn off detectors' and then 'SSE(VBD:p\')', leading to 'v, v'. If 'no', it goes directly to 'SSE(VBD:p\')' and then 'v, v'. The label 'V.151(06)_F12' is at the bottom right.](7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg) + +``` +graph TD; Start([a,a]) --> Branch(( )); Branch --> Event1[/Start of CI/XCI/]; Event1 --> Decision1{VBD Preferred?}; Decision1 -- Yes --> Process1[/SSE(VBD:CI/XCI)/]; Decision1 -- No --> Data1([a, a]); Process1 --> Data2([v, a]); Branch --> Event2[/SSE(TP:X)/]; Event2 --> Process2[/start auto-mode/probing +(clause 20.4.4.1)/]; Process2 --> Event3[/SSE(TP, p\')/]; Event3 --> Data3([tp, tp]); Branch --> Event4[/end of CI/XCI/]; Event4 --> Process3[/tty_type=V.18/]; Process3 --> Process4[/squellch TDM line/]; Process4 --> Event5[/SSE(TP, CI/XCI)/]; Event5 --> Data4([tp, a]); Branch --> Event6[/SSE(VBD:X)/]; Event6 --> Decision2{ }; Note[X=tty modulation +not supported using +text-relay by other +gateway OR FDX +and not supported by +this gateway] -.-> Decision2; Decision2 -- yes --> Process5[/turn off +detectors/]; Decision2 -- no --> Event7[/SSE(VBD:p\')/]; Process5 --> Event7; Event7 --> Data5([v, v]); +``` + +V.151(06)\_F12 + +Figure 20-3 (sheet 2 of 10) is a complex SDL diagram starting from state 'a,a'. It branches into four main paths. Path 1: 'Start of CI/XCI' event leads to a decision 'VBD Preferred?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'SSE(VBD:CI/XCI)' and then 'v, a'. If 'No', it goes to 'a, a'. Path 2: 'SSE(TP:X)' event leads to 'start auto-mode/probing (clause 20.4.4.1)', then 'SSE(TP, p\')', and then 'tp, tp'. Path 3: 'end of CI/XCI' event leads to 'tty\_type=V.18', then 'squellch TDM line', then 'SSE(TP, CI/XCI)', and then 'tp, a'. Path 4: 'SSE(VBD:X)' event leads to a decision diamond. A note points to this diamond: 'X=tty modulation not supported using text-relay by other gateway OR FDX and not supported by this gateway'. If 'yes', it goes to 'turn off detectors' and then 'SSE(VBD:p\')', leading to 'v, v'. If 'no', it goes directly to 'SSE(VBD:p\')' and then 'v, v'. The label 'V.151(06)\_F12' is at the bottom right. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (a,a) Part 1 (sheet 2 of 10) + +![SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (a,a) Part 2. The diagram shows four parallel event paths from a common top line. Path 1: '2225 Hz' event leads to 'tty_type= Bell103' process, then 'SSE (VBD:2225)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 2: 'ANSam' event leads to 'tty_type=V.18' process, then 'SSE (VBD:ANSam)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 3: 'ANS detect' event leads to 'SSE (VBD:ANS)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 4: 'carrier detected X (clause 20.4.4.2)' event leads to 'turn off detectors' process, then a decision 'text relay support for X?'. If 'no', it leads to 'SSE (VBD:X)' process and 'v,a' output. If 'yes', it leads to another decision '(X=FDX) && !(remote gateway support)'. If 'yes' to this second decision, it leads to 'SSE(VBD:X)' process and 'v, a' output. If 'no', it leads to 'tty_mode=X' process, then 'SSE(TP,X)' process, and finally 'tp, a' output. The identifier 'V.151(06)_F13' is located at the bottom right of the diagram area.](c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + TopLine[ ] --- L1[ ] + TopLine --- L2[ ] + TopLine --- L3[ ] + TopLine --- L4[ ] + + L1 --> E1[/2225 Hz/] + E1 --> P1[tty_type= Bell103] + P1 --> S1{{SSE (VBD:2225)}} + S1 --> O1([v, a]) + + L2 --> E2[/ANSam/] + E2 --> P2[tty_type=V.18] + P2 --> S2{{SSE (VBD:ANSam)}} + S2 --> O2([v, a]) + + L3 --> E3[/ANS detect/] + E3 --> S3{{SSE (VBD:ANS)}} + S3 --> O3([v, a]) + + L4 --> E4[/carrier detected X +(clause 20.4.4.2)/] + E4 --> P4[turn off detectors] + P4 --> D1{text relay support for X?} + D1 -- no --> S4{{SSE (VBD:X)}} + S4 --> O4([v,a]) + D1 -- yes --> D2{(X=FDX) && !(remote gateway support)} + D2 -- yes --> S5{{SSE(VBD:X)}} + S5 --> O5([v, a]) + D2 -- no --> P5[tty_mode=X] + P5 --> S6{{SSE(TP,X)}} + S6 --> O6([tp, a]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F13 + +SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (a,a) Part 2. The diagram shows four parallel event paths from a common top line. Path 1: '2225 Hz' event leads to 'tty\_type= Bell103' process, then 'SSE (VBD:2225)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 2: 'ANSam' event leads to 'tty\_type=V.18' process, then 'SSE (VBD:ANSam)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 3: 'ANS detect' event leads to 'SSE (VBD:ANS)' process, and finally 'v, a' output. Path 4: 'carrier detected X (clause 20.4.4.2)' event leads to 'turn off detectors' process, then a decision 'text relay support for X?'. If 'no', it leads to 'SSE (VBD:X)' process and 'v,a' output. If 'yes', it leads to another decision '(X=FDX) && !(remote gateway support)'. If 'yes' to this second decision, it leads to 'SSE(VBD:X)' process and 'v, a' output. If 'no', it leads to 'tty\_mode=X' process, then 'SSE(TP,X)' process, and finally 'tp, a' output. The identifier 'V.151(06)\_F13' is located at the bottom right of the diagram area. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (a,a) Part 2 (sheet 3 of 10) + +![SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 1. The flowchart starts with state 'v,v' and branches into three main paths: SSE(TR, X), SSE(TR, CJ), and end CI/XCI. Each path contains various state transitions, decision diamonds, and actions based on 'tty_type' and other conditions. A note at the top right points to the SSE(TR, CJ) path. A dashed box at the bottom right contains a note about VBD mode.](692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([v,v]) --> SSE_TR_X[SSE(TR, X)] + Start --> SSE_TR_CJ[SSE(TR, CJ)] + Start --> End_CI_XCI[/end CI/XCI/] + + Note1[§ 20.4.4 Note 1] --> SSE_TR_CJ + + SSE_TR_X --> D1{tty_type= Bell103?} + D1 -- yes --> SSE_TR_Bell103{{SSE(TR: Bell103)}} + SSE_TR_Bell103 --> Act1[Connect to Bell103] + Act1 --> End1([tr, tp]) + + D1 -- no --> D2{tty_type= V.18?} + D2 -- yes --> SSE_TR_Y{{SSE(TR, Y) +(Y is the modulation used locally, Y=X if available)}} + SSE_TR_Y --> Act2[connect to V.18 modem with Y +(clause 20.4.4.4)] + Act2 --> End2([tr, tp]) + + D2 -- no --> D3{X=CI/XCI} + D3 -- yes --> SSE_TP_P1{{SSE(tp, p')}} + SSE_TP_P1 --> End3([tp, tp]) + + D3 -- no --> Act3[start automodem originating +(clause 20.4.4.5)] + Act3 --> SSE_TP_P1 + + SSE_TR_CJ --> D4{tty_type= v.18} + D4 -- yes --> Act4[connect V.18(V.21)] + Act4 --> SSE_TR_P1{{SSE(TR, p')}} + SSE_TR_P1 --> End4([tr, tr]) + + D4 -- no --> SSE_A{{SSE(A)}} + SSE_A --> End5([a, i]) + + End_CI_XCI --> Act5[tty_type=V.18] + Act5 --> SSE_TP_CI_XCI{{SSE(tp, CI/XCI)}} + SSE_TP_CI_XCI --> Act6[squelch transmitter] + Act6 --> End6([tp, v]) + + Note2[Can only receive SSE(TR) in VBD mode for case of V.8 through VBD because of failure to detect CI/XCI] + Note2 -.-> End4 + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F14\_CM + +SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 1. The flowchart starts with state 'v,v' and branches into three main paths: SSE(TR, X), SSE(TR, CJ), and end CI/XCI. Each path contains various state transitions, decision diamonds, and actions based on 'tty\_type' and other conditions. A note at the top right points to the SSE(TR, CJ) path. A dashed box at the bottom right contains a note about VBD mode. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 1 (sheet 4 of 10) + +![SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 2. The flowchart starts with four parallel paths from a common top line. Path 1: JM (text mode) -> G1 & G2 support V.18 native? -> yes -> tty_type=V.18 -> v,v; no -> v,v. Path 2: CM (text mode) -> G1 & G2 support V.18 native? -> yes -> tty_type=V.18 -> v,v; no -> v,v. Path 3: end of CJ -> tty_type=V.18? -> yes -> SSE(TR:CJ) -> connect V.18(V.21) -> tr,v; no -> v,v. Path 4: Carrier detect X (clause 20.4.4.2) -> tty_type=V.18? -> no -> turn off detectors -> (X==FDX) && !(remote gateway support) -> yes -> v,v; no -> tty_type=X -> SSE(TP,X) -> tp,v; yes -> Allow end-to-end probing when V.18 answers non-V.18 -> v,v. A dashed box around the 'Allow end-to-end probing...' note is labeled V.151(06)_F15.](08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + TopLine[ ] + TopLine -- "[§ 20.4.4 Note 1]" --> JM[JM +(text mode)] + TopLine -- "[§ 20.4.4 Note 1]" --> CM[CM +(text mode)] + TopLine -- "[§ 20.4.4 Note 1]" --> endCJ[end of CJ] + TopLine -- "[§ 20.4.4 Note 1]" --> CD[Carrier detect X +(clause 20.4.4.2)] + + JM --> G1G2_1{G1 & G2 +support +V.18 native?} + G1G2_1 -- yes --> ttyV18_1[tty_type=V.18] + ttyV18_1 --> vv1_1((v,v)) + G1G2_1 -- no --> vv1_1 + + CM --> G1G2_2{G1 & G2 +support +V.18 native?} + G1G2_2 -- yes --> ttyV18_2[tty_type=V.18] + ttyV18_2 --> vv1_2((v,v)) + G1G2_2 -- no --> vv1_2 + + endCJ --> ttyV18_3{tty_type= +V.18?} + ttyV18_3 -- yes --> SSE_TR_CJ[SSE(TR:CJ)] + SSE_TR_CJ --> connectV18[connect +V.18(V.21)] + connectV18 --> trv1((tr,v)) + ttyV18_3 -- no --> vv1_3((v,v)) + + CD --> ttyV18_4{tty_type= +V.18?} + ttyV18_4 -- no --> turnOff[turn off +detectors] + turnOff --> XFDX{X==FDX +&& +!(remote gateway +support)} + XFDX -- yes --> vv1_4((v,v)) + XFDX -- no --> ttyX[tty_type=X] + ttyX --> SSE_TP_X[SSE(TP,X)] + SSE_TP_X --> tpv1((tp,v)) + ttyV18_4 -- yes --> AllowEnd[Allow end-to-end probing +when V.18 answers +non-V.18] + AllowEnd -.-> vv1_5((v,v)) + AllowEnd -.-> V151F15[V.151(06)_F15] + +``` + +SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 2. The flowchart starts with four parallel paths from a common top line. Path 1: JM (text mode) -> G1 & G2 support V.18 native? -> yes -> tty\_type=V.18 -> v,v; no -> v,v. Path 2: CM (text mode) -> G1 & G2 support V.18 native? -> yes -> tty\_type=V.18 -> v,v; no -> v,v. Path 3: end of CJ -> tty\_type=V.18? -> yes -> SSE(TR:CJ) -> connect V.18(V.21) -> tr,v; no -> v,v. Path 4: Carrier detect X (clause 20.4.4.2) -> tty\_type=V.18? -> no -> turn off detectors -> (X==FDX) && !(remote gateway support) -> yes -> v,v; no -> tty\_type=X -> SSE(TP,X) -> tp,v; yes -> Allow end-to-end probing when V.18 answers non-V.18 -> v,v. A dashed box around the 'Allow end-to-end probing...' note is labeled V.151(06)\_F15. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (v,v) Part 2 (sheet 5 of 10) + +![SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (tp, tp) Part 1. The flowchart starts with state 'tp, tp' and branches into three paths: ANSam, SSE(TR:X), and Auto-mode/probing time-out. The ANSam path leads to SSE(TR:ANSam) and then to 'start connect with answering V.18 PTP (clause 20.4.4.6)', resulting in state 'tr, tp'. The SSE(TR:X) path leads to a decision 'tty_type = unknown'. If 'yes', it leads to SSE(A) and then state 'a, i'. If 'no', it leads to 'start connect with PTP (clause 20.4.4.3)', then SSE(TR, p'), and finally state 'tr, tp'. The Auto-mode/probing time-out path leads to SSE(VBD:Timeout) and then 'turn off detectors', resulting in state 'v, tp'. A dashed line connects the ANSam path to the 'tty_type = unknown' decision with the note 'Error if we get here without knowing the TTY type'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_F16.](7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start([tp, tp]) --> ANSam[/ANSam/] + Start --> SSETRX[/SSE(TR:X)/] + Start --> AutoMode[/Auto-mode/ +probing time-out/] + + ANSam --> SSETRANSam{{SSE(TR:ANSam)}} + SSETRANSam --> StartConnectPTP[start connect +with answering +V.18 PTP +(clause 20.4.4.6)] + StartConnectPTP --> EndTrTp1([tr, tp]) + + SSETRX --> TTYType{tty_type = +unknown} + TTYType -- yes --> SSEA{{SSE(A)}} + SSEA --> EndAi([a, i]) + TTYType -- no --> StartConnectPTP2[start connect +with PTP +(clause 20.4.4.3)] + StartConnectPTP2 --> SSETRp'{{SSE(TR, p')}} + SSETRp' --> EndTrTp2([tr, tp]) + + AutoMode --> SSEVBDTimeout{{SSE(VBD:Timeout)}} + SSEVBDTimeout --> TurnOffDetectors[turn off detectors] + TurnOffDetectors --> EndVtp([v, tp]) + + Note[Error if we get here +without knowing the +TTY type] -.-> TTYType + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F16 + +SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (tp, tp) Part 1. The flowchart starts with state 'tp, tp' and branches into three paths: ANSam, SSE(TR:X), and Auto-mode/probing time-out. The ANSam path leads to SSE(TR:ANSam) and then to 'start connect with answering V.18 PTP (clause 20.4.4.6)', resulting in state 'tr, tp'. The SSE(TR:X) path leads to a decision 'tty\_type = unknown'. If 'yes', it leads to SSE(A) and then state 'a, i'. If 'no', it leads to 'start connect with PTP (clause 20.4.4.3)', then SSE(TR, p'), and finally state 'tr, tp'. The Auto-mode/probing time-out path leads to SSE(VBD:Timeout) and then 'turn off detectors', resulting in state 'v, tp'. A dashed line connects the ANSam path to the 'tty\_type = unknown' decision with the note 'Error if we get here without knowing the TTY type'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_F16. + +**Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (tp,tp) Part 1 (sheet 6 of 10)** + +![SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (tp, tp) Part 2. The flowchart shows two main paths. The left path starts with 'carrier detected X (clause 20.4.4.2)', leading to a decision 'text relay support for X?'. If 'yes', it checks '(X=FDX) &&! (remote gateway support)'. If 'yes', it sends 'SSE(TR,X)', then 'connect using modulation X', and ends at 'tr, tp'. If 'no', it sends 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, tp'. If 'no' to the first decision, it sends 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, tp'. The right path starts with 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'SSE(VBD:p\')', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, v' with label 'V.151(06)_F17'.](f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start(( )) --> Carrier[carrier detected X +(clause 20.4.4.2)] + Start --> SSE_VBD_X[SSE(VBD:X)] + + Carrier --> TextRelay{text relay support for X?} + TextRelay -- yes --> FDX{X=FDX &&! remote gateway support} + TextRelay -- no --> SSE_VBD_X + + FDX -- yes --> SSE_TR_X[SSE(TR,X)] + FDX -- no --> SSE_VBD_X + + SSE_TR_X --> Connect[connect using modulation X] + Connect --> End_TR(tp, tp) + + SSE_VBD_X --> TurnOff1[turn off detectors] + TurnOff1 --> End_V(tp, tp) + + SSE_VBD_X --> SSE_VBD_p[SSE(VBD:p')] + SSE_VBD_p --> TurnOff2[turn off detectors] + TurnOff2 --> End_V2(v, v) + End_V2 --- V151(V.151(06)_F17) + +``` + +SDL flowchart for SSE protocol state (tp, tp) Part 2. The flowchart shows two main paths. The left path starts with 'carrier detected X (clause 20.4.4.2)', leading to a decision 'text relay support for X?'. If 'yes', it checks '(X=FDX) &&! (remote gateway support)'. If 'yes', it sends 'SSE(TR,X)', then 'connect using modulation X', and ends at 'tr, tp'. If 'no', it sends 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, tp'. If 'no' to the first decision, it sends 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, tp'. The right path starts with 'SSE(VBD:X)', then 'SSE(VBD:p\')', then 'turn off detectors', and ends at 'v, v' with label 'V.151(06)\_F17'. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol state (tp, tp) Part 2 (sheet 7 of 10) + +![SDL diagram for SSE protocol (sheet 8 of 10). The diagram shows a sequence of events and actions. It starts with an event 'tp, v' leading to an action 'start timer'. From 'start timer', three parallel paths emerge: 1) An event 'SSE(TR, X)' leads to a decision 'tty_type=unknown'. If 'yes', it leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. If 'no', it leads to an action 'start connect with PTP (clause 20.4.4.3)', followed by an event 'SSE(TR, p\')' and then 'tr, tr'. A dashed box points to the 'yes' path with the text 'Error if we get here without knowing the TTY type'. 2) An event 'SSE(TP, p\')' leads to 'tp, tp'. 3) An event 'Timer expired' leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_F18.](e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start(tp, v) --> StartTimer[start timer] + StartTimer --> SSE_TR_X[SSE(TR, X)] + StartTimer --> SSE_TP_p[SSE(TP, p')] + StartTimer --> TimerExpired[Timer expired] + + SSE_TR_X --> TTYUnknown{tty_type=unknown} + TTYUnknown -- yes --> SSE_A_1[SSE(A)] + SSE_A_1 --> ai_1(a, i) + TTYUnknown -- no --> StartConnect[start connect with PTP +(clause 20.4.4.3)] + StartConnect --> SSE_TR_p[SSE(TR, p')] + SSE_TR_p --> tr_tr(tr, tr) + + SSE_TP_p --> tp_tp(tp, tp) + TimerExpired --> SSE_A_2[SSE(A)] + SSE_A_2 --> ai_2(a, i) + +``` + +Error if we get here without knowing the TTY type + +V.151(06)\_F18 + +SDL diagram for SSE protocol (sheet 8 of 10). The diagram shows a sequence of events and actions. It starts with an event 'tp, v' leading to an action 'start timer'. From 'start timer', three parallel paths emerge: 1) An event 'SSE(TR, X)' leads to a decision 'tty\_type=unknown'. If 'yes', it leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. If 'no', it leads to an action 'start connect with PTP (clause 20.4.4.3)', followed by an event 'SSE(TR, p\')' and then 'tr, tr'. A dashed box points to the 'yes' path with the text 'Error if we get here without knowing the TTY type'. 2) An event 'SSE(TP, p\')' leads to 'tp, tp'. 3) An event 'Timer expired' leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_F18. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol (sheet 8 of 10) + +![SDL diagram for SSE protocol (sheet 9 of 10). The diagram shows a sequence of events and actions. It starts with an event '*y, *x' leading to an action 'start timer'. From 'start timer', two parallel paths emerge: 1) An event 'Timer expired' leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. 2) An event 'SSE(*y, p\')' leads to '*y, *y'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_F19.](1142ba0197b158bb198186fe8baccc32_img.jpg) + +``` + +graph TD + Start(*y, *x) --> StartTimer[start timer] + StartTimer --> TimerExpired[Timer expired] + StartTimer --> SSE_y_p[SSE(*y, p')] + + TimerExpired --> SSE_A[SSE(A)] + SSE_A --> ai(a, i) + SSE_y_p --> yy(*y, *y) + +``` + +$(y, x) = \{(v, a), (tp, a), (tr, tp), (tr, v), (v, tp), (a, tr)\}$ + +V.151(06)\_F19 + +SDL diagram for SSE protocol (sheet 9 of 10). The diagram shows a sequence of events and actions. It starts with an event '\*y, \*x' leading to an action 'start timer'. From 'start timer', two parallel paths emerge: 1) An event 'Timer expired' leads to an action 'SSE(A)' and then 'a, i'. 2) An event 'SSE(\*y, p\')' leads to '\*y, \*y'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_F19. + +Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol (sheet 9 of 10) + +![Sequence diagram for the SSE protocol. It starts with an oval containing 'tr, tr', followed by a rectangle labeled 'carrier loss', then a rectangle labeled 'SSE(A)', and ends with an oval labeled 'a, tr'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_F20.](f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + Start([tr, tr]) --> CarrierLoss[carrier loss] + CarrierLoss --> SSEA[SSE(A)] + SSEA --> End([a, tr]) + +``` + +V.151(06)\_F20 + +Sequence diagram for the SSE protocol. It starts with an oval containing 'tr, tr', followed by a rectangle labeled 'carrier loss', then a rectangle labeled 'SSE(A)', and ends with an oval labeled 'a, tr'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_F20. + +**Figure 20-3 – SDL for SSE protocol (sheet 10 of 10)** + +##### 20.4.4.1 Auto-mode/probing + +In this procedure box, the gateway starts the auto-mode/probing processing described in this clause. The purpose of the auto-mode/probing process is to determine what modulation its local PTP device supports. This procedure starts when the gateway receives an SSE(TP) from the remote gateway. If the RIC in the SSE(TP) indicates CI/XCI was detected, the gateway shall perform the "automodding originating" procedure as defined in clause 5.1 of [ITU-T V.18] with the modification of only looking for modulations that it supports for text relay. + +If the RIC in the SSE(TP) indicates a signal detected other than CI/XCI, the gateway shall perform automode probing as defined in Figure 2b of [ITU-T V.18] and its corresponding text. The gateway shall not generate the ANSam signal at the beginning of these procedures, i.e., it shall skip over the generate ANSam block in Figure 2b of [ITU-T V.18] and go straight to the probing flows. The gateway shall only probe for modulations that it supports for text relay. + +The gateway shall continue the auto-mode/probing procedures until one of the following events occur: + +- A PTP modulation that is supported for text relay is detected. +- A PTP modulation that is not supported for text relay is detected. +- Auto-mode/probing time-out occurs. + +Auto-mode/probing time-out occurs when the gateway has proceeded through at least two cycles of probing as defined in [ITU-T V.18] for the modulations that it supports for text relay without detection of a response from the local PTP device. + +In the scenario where an HDX PTP is originating the call and that PTP generates characters before the answering PTP generates any signal, the gateway connected to the answering PTP would begin the probing sequence as described in this clause. Since the PTP device that the gateway is probing is the answering PTP, there is likelihood that the probing would fail in the case the answering PTP is HDX. The fall back to VBD would not result in a successful connection because the two PTP devices are of different types; i.e., the originating is HDX and the answering is FDX. If the answering PTP is FDX, the probing should still be successful and the PTP modems connect using text relay. + +If a gateway supports a subset of the modulations described in [ITU-T V.18] for text relay, the gateway only probes for those modulations it supports. If the gateway supports the modulation indicated by the SSE(TP) RIC, the gateway shall start probing with this modulation if the modulation is an FDX type, else the gateway should start probing with this modulation (i.e., for HDX type). + +##### **20.4.4.2 Carrier detect X** + +In this event box, the gateway has detected a signal that indicates the presence of a local PTP device. Clause 20.4.1 describes the signals that shall be detected for determining the presence of a local PTP device. + +##### **20.4.4.3 Start connect with PTP** + +In this procedure box, the gateway shall start the connect sequence with its local PTP. + +If the gateway's *tty\_mode* state variable is V.18, the gateway shall use the modulation indicated by the RIC of the received SSE(TR) to connect with the PTP if that modulation is supported by the gateway. If the gateway does not support the modulation indicated by the RIC in the received SSE(TR), the gateway shall use a supported modulation that is closest to the signalling rate of the modulation indicated in the RIC. + +If the gateway's *tty\_mode* state variable is not V.18, the gateway shall use the modulation indicated by *tty\_mode* to connect with the local PTP device. + +##### **20.4.4.4 Connect to V.18 modem with Y** + +A gateway will enter this procedure box only if it is connected with a V.18-compliant PTP device. + +The gateway shall use the modulation indicated by the RIC of the received SSE(TR) to connect with the V.18 PTP if that modulation is supported by the gateway. If the gateway does not support the modulation indicated by the RIC in the received SSE(TR), the gateway shall use a supported modulation that is closest to the signalling rate of the modulation indicated in the RIC. + +#### **20.4.4.5 Start "automodding originating"** + +The gateway shall perform the "automodding originating" procedure as defined in 5.1 of [ITU-T V.18]. The gateway shall continue the "automodding originating" processing until one of the following events occurs: + +- A PTP modulation that is supported for text relay is detected. +- A PTP modulation that is not supported for text relay is detected. +- Auto-mode/probing time-out occurs. + +Auto-mode/probing time-out occurs when the gateway has proceeded through at least two cycles of probing as defined in [ITU-T V.18] for the modulations that it supports for text relay without the detection of a response from the local PTP device. + +##### **20.4.4.6 Start connect with answering V.18 PTP** + +When this procedure box is entered, both PTP devices are V.18-compliant. A gateway that enters this procedure box is connected to the answering V.18 PTP device. The gateway shall use V.21 as defined in V.18 if this modulation is supported. If V.21 as defined in [ITU-T V.18] is not supported, the gateway should use a supported modulation that is closest to the V.21 signalling rate. + +## **20.5 Visual flow control** + +During normal call discrimination procedure there may be situations where the local PTP device is connected for a time to the local gateway without an end-to-end connection established between the endpoint PTP devices. An example would be a local PTP connected to its local gateway while the remote gateway is performing a probing sequence with its local PTP device in order to establish a connection with it. In these situations, the gateway could optionally provide a message to its local PTP device indicating to the user to wait before sending text. The gateway could then follow up with a message indicating to the user that it is clear to send once the remote gateway establishes a connection with its PTP device. The messages to be used are beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +## Annex A + +## Procedures for the optional support of SPRT protocol + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +### A.1 Overview + +To use SPRT protocol, the SSE protocol must be negotiated in addition to SPRT being negotiated. If the SSE protocol is not negotiated, RTP shall be used for transmitting T.140 encoded data. + +Parameters for SPRT are defined in Annex B of [ITU-T V.150.1]. Transport channel 3 shall not be used for transporting T.140 encoded data. + +SPRT defines several formats for carrying data. If SPRT is used then the default format for transporting T.140 encoded data shall be I\_OCTET\_INFO as described in clause 15.4.11.1 of [ITU-T V.150.1]. + +### A.2 SDP negotiation + +The SPRT capability is advertised in SDP as a latent capability following the syntax specified in [IETF RFC 3407]. The media type is "audio" and the transport name assigned "udpsprt". The media format is "v150tr". The following example illustrates the advertisement of an RTP media stream that uses G.711 for audio and SPRT for the transport of real-time text: + +``` +m=audio 49230 RTP/AVP 0 +a=sgn:0 +a=cdsc:1 audio udpsprt 100 +a=cpar:a=sprtmap:100 v150tr/8000 +``` + +In the above example, the payload type associated with SPRT is 100. + +The optional parameters associated with the SPRT transport protocols are declared via the SDP attribute "sprtparm" and vendor-specific parameters are declared via the SDP attribute "vndpar" as illustrated in the syntax below: + +``` +a=cpar:a=sprtparm: + +a=cpar:a=vndpar: +[] +``` + +Refer to Annex E of [ITU-T V.150.1] for a full description of the above parameters. + +### A.3 H.245 negotiation + +The SPRT capability is advertised in [ITU-T H.245] as a generic audio capability. The capability is specified as follows: + +**Table A.1 – Capability identifier for V.150.1** + +| | | +|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Capability name | SPRT Text Relay Capability | +| Capability class | Audio capability | +| Capability identifier type | Standard | +| Capability identifier value | {itu-t (0) recommendation (0) v (22) 151 toip (0) } | +| maxBitRate | The maxBitRate field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | +| Collapsing | This field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | +| nonCollapsing | This field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | +| nonCollapsingRaw | This field shall be present and shall contain a value encoded using the ALIGNED variant of BASIC-PER for the ASN.1 type defined below. | +| Transport | This field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | + +The ASN.1 syntax associated with SPRT is: + +``` +V151SPRT-CAPABILITY DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= BEGIN + +IMPORTS + NonStandardParameter FROM MULTIMEDIA-SYSTEM-CONTROL; + +V150MoIPCapability ::= SEQUENCE +{ + nonStandard SEQUENCE OF NonStandardParameter OPTIONAL, + sprtParameters SEQUENCE + { + maxPayloadSizeChannel0 INTEGER(140..256) OPTIONAL, -- Default 140 + maxPayloadSizeChannel1 INTEGER(132..256) OPTIONAL, -- Default 132 + maxWindowSizeChannel1 INTEGER(32..96) OPTIONAL, -- Default 32 + maxPayloadSizeChannel2 INTEGER(132..256) OPTIONAL, -- Default 132 + maxWindowSizeChannel2 INTEGER(8..32) OPTIONAL, -- Default 8, + maxPayloadSizeChannel3 INTEGER(140..256) OPTIONAL, -- Default 140 + ... + } OPTIONAL, + ... +} +END +``` + +Equipment manufacturers may use the **nonStandard** field to signal any non-standard information that is specific to their ToIP implementations as it relates to SPRT. The first octet of the data field within the non-standard parameter shall be the vendor-specific "vendor-tag", as specified in clause 8 of [ITU-T V.150.0]. A value of 0 in the first octet means that the parameters is not bound to the specified vendor ID (i.e., it is not bound to the value of **nonStandard.object** or **nonStandard.h221NonStandard** values). This "vendor-tag" may be used in other related messages, such as SSE messages. + +Refer to Table B.2 of [ITU-T V.150.1] for description and default values for the **sprtParameters**. + +## Annex B + +## Definition of capabilities for use within H.245-based systems + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +This annex defines the capabilities that need to be exchanged between H.245-based systems for the transmission of analogue PSTN text telephony signals over packet-based networks. + +The payload format used for the transmission of text characters is described in Annex E. + +H.323 systems have a means of advertising the ability to transport text over RTP using the "t140" capability defined in [ITU-T H.245]. However, this capability does not provide a means to advertise supported modulations, such as Baudot. Annex G of [ITU-T H.323] also does not define those modulations, but it does have a means to allow another specification, such as [b-TIA-1001] or [ITU-T V.151], to do that. + +Gateways compliant to this Recommendation must be able to support the transmission of text interleaved with audio. The respective capability definition for H.245-based systems is in Table B.1, as taken from Annex G of [ITU-T H.323]. + +**Table B.1 – H.245 capability definition for text transport (T140Audio)** + +| | | +|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Capability name: | T140Audio | +| Capability class: | Audio Capability | +| Capability identifier type: | Standard. | +| Capability identifier value: | itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) 323 annex(1) g (7) audio(0) | +| maxBitRate | The maxBitRate field shall be included and indicate the maximum bits per second. When using the Flow Control Command or other signals in relation to this capability, any maxBitRate field shall be interpreted to be in units of bits/s, as opposed to the typical 100 bits/s used in H.245. This is due to the low bit rate nature of real-time text communication, including the low bit rates used by many PSTN textphone protocols. | +| nonCollapsing | This field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | +| nonCollapsingRaw | This field shall not be included and shall be ignored if received. | +| Transport | This field shall not be included. | + +Devices may also advertise, either in the terminal capability set, the Open Logical Channel, or both, the capability to receive a specified number of characters per second. Devices may advertise the maximum characters per second via the below optional parameter. + +**Table B.2 – Characters per second parameter** + +| | | +|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Parameter name: | cps | +| Parameter description: | This is a collapsing capability.
Indicates the maximum number of characters per second that may be received on a session. When carried inside an Open Logical Channel (OLC), it indicates the maximum transmission rate that the other endpoint may use if it opens a corresponding text session. | +| Parameter identifier value: | standard: 0 | +| Parameter status: | Optional | +| Parameter type: | unsignedMin | +| Supersedes: | – | + +The Textphone Modulations parameter is an optional parameter that indicates the set of supported modulations for text relay. Absence of this parameter may be interpreted to mean that all modulations are supported or that the device is a native IP device. + +**Table B.3 – Textphone Modulations Parameter** + +| Parameter name: | Textphone Modulations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|---------|---|--------|---|-----|---|---------|---|-----|---|-----|---|-----|-----|----------| +| Parameter description: | This is a non-collapsing capability.
Indicates the gateway's supported textphone modulations. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Parameter identifier value: | standard: 100 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Parameter status: | Optional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Parameter type: | booleanArray, populated as follows (bit 0 = lsb)

Bit Meaning
0 TIA825
1 EDT
2 BELL103
3 V23
4 V18
5 V21
6-7 Reserved
| Bit | Meaning | 0 | TIA825 | 1 | EDT | 2 | BELL103 | 3 | V23 | 4 | V18 | 5 | V21 | 6-7 | Reserved | +| Bit | Meaning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | TIA825 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1 | EDT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 2 | BELL103 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 3 | V23 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4 | V18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5 | V21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6-7 | Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Supersedes: | – | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +Devices may advertise their preference for switching out of VBD mode between text spurts when VBD mode is used for text. + +**Table B.4 – Remain In VBD Not Preferred Parameter** + +| | | +|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Parameter name: | RemainInVBDNotPreferred | +| Parameter description: | This is a collapsing capability.
Indicates that the gateway would prefer to switch out of VBD mode between text spurts. Both gateways must indicate this preference for the gateway to switch out of VBD mode after a text spurt, else the gateway shall remain in VBD mode for the duration of the call. | +| Parameter identifier value: | standard: 101 | +| Parameter status: | Optional | +| Parameter type: | Logical | +| Supersedes: | – | + +These capabilities are advertised as part of the Terminal Capability Set message exchanged between two devices. These capabilities are also used in Open Logical Channel (OLC) messages in Fast Connect and normal H.245 logical channel signalling. + +Below is an example of an OLC message that has G.729 audio, text, and redundancy protecting the text packets, and RFC 2833 for DTMF transport. + +``` +{ + forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1, + forwardLogicalChannelParameters { + dataType : multiplePayloadStream { + element { + dataType : audioData : g729 2 + }, + element { + dataType : redundancyEncoding { + primary { + dataType : audioData : genericAudioCapability { + capabilityIdentifier : standard { + itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) + 323 annex(1) g (7) audio(0) + }, + nonCollapsing { + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 100, + parameterValue : booleanArray : 00000011b + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 101, + parameterValue : logical : NULL + }, + }, + }, + payloadType 97 -- The PT for the redundant encoding + }, + secondary { + { + dataType : audioData : genericAudioCapability { + capabilityIdentifier : standard { + itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) + 323 annex(1) g (7) audio(0) + }, + nonCollapsing { + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 100, + parameterValue : booleanArray : 00000001b + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 101, + parameterValue : logical : NULL + }, + }, + payloadType 97 -- The PT for the redundant encoding + } + } + } + } + } + } + } +} +``` + +``` + + } + }, + payloadType 101 -- The PT for the RFC 2198 packet +}, +element { + dataType : audioData : audioTelephonyEvent { + audioTelephoneEvent : "0-15" + }, + payloadType 102 +} +}, +multiplexParameters : h2250LogicalChannelParameters { + sessionID 1 +} +} + +``` + +Note that the gateway only indicated support for [b-ANSI/TIA-825] (Baudot) and EDT PSTN PTP devices in the above example. The assumption is that the gateway will either use VBD (not shown in this example) for other PSTN PTP types, or will transition to text relay in order to provide interworking between dissimilar PSTN PTP types. + +## Annex C + +## SDP description of sessions supporting V.151 + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +This annex defines the syntax that needs to be exchanged between SDP-based systems for the transmission of analogue PSTN Text Telephony signals over packet-based networks. The payload format used for the transmission of text characters is described in Annex E. + +The text relay capability and associated procedures are represented in SDP using the MIME type "audio/t140c". A very simple example of the use of the audio/t140c within SDP is: + +``` +m=audio 7200 RTP/AVP 18 100 +a=rtpmap:98 t140c/8000 +``` + +This specifies the use of G.729 as payload type 18 along with audio/t140 as payload type 100. Note that the clock rate specified is 8000 Hz. The clock rate value should have the same value as for any audio codec packets interleaved in the same RTP stream. + +In some cases, it is necessary to limit the rate at which characters are transmitted. For example, when a PSTN gateway is interworking between an IP device and a PSTN textphone, it may be necessary to limit the character rate from the IP device in order to avoid throwing away characters in case of buffer overflow at the PSTN gateway. + +To control the character transmission rate, the MIME parameter "cps" in the "fmt" attribute is defined. It is used in SDP with the following syntax: + +``` +a=fmt: cps= +``` + +The field is populated with the payload type that is used for text. The field contains an integer representing the maximum number of characters that may be received per second. The value shall be used as a mean value over any 10-second interval. + +Devices in receipt of this parameter shall adhere to the request by transmitting characters at a rate at or below the specified value. In absence of this parameter, devices shall not transmit more than 30 characters per second. + +The 'gpmid' (general purpose media descriptor) syntax attribute is used for signaling the set of supported textphone modulations. The general format for this attribute line is: + +``` +a=gpmid: +``` + +The value of shall be set to the value of the RTP payload type for text. The shall be a comma-separated list of modulations following the following syntax: + +``` +modulations = "tpmods=" modulation *(", " modulation) +modulation = "tia825" | "edt" | "bell1103" | "v23" | +"v18" | "v21" +``` + +Absence of the textphone modulations attribute may be interpreted to mean all modulations are supported or that the device is a native IP device. A gateway compliant to this Recommendation shall send the textphone modulations attribute. + +The VBD mode preference attribute is used to indicate the preference a gateway has for switching out of VBD mode and into AUDIO mode between text spurts when VBD is used for transmission + +of text. Both gateways must indicate the preference to switch out of VBD mode after a text spurt else the gateway shall remain in VBD mode for the duration of the call. The value of shall be set to the value of the RTP payload type for text. The shall indicate the gateway's preference. A 'remain-in-vbd=yes' indicates preference to stay in VBD mode, while 'remain-in-vbd=no' indicates preference to switch between VBD and AUDIO modes between text spurts. This attribute is optional. If it is not sent, the gateway is indicating that its preference is to not switch out of VBD mode after text spurt. + +Redundancy of audio media as defined in [IETF RFC 2198] may be used to provide better reliability in networks where packet loss exists. The example below shows how SDP may be used to signal an offer to send G.729 audio interleaved with text protected with two levels of redundancy: + +``` +m=audio 7200 RTP/AVP 18 98 100 +a=rtpmap:98 t140c/8000 +a=fmtp:98 cps=20 +a=gpmid:98 tpmids=baudot,edt +a=gpmid:98 remain-in-vbd=no +a=rtpmap:100 red/8000 +a=fmtp:100 98/98/98 +``` + +Note that the gateway only indicated support for Baudot PSTN and EDT PTP devices in the above example. The assumption is that the gateway will either use VBD (not shown in this example) for other PSTN PTP types or will use relay in order to provide interworking between dissimilar PSTN PTP types. + +## Annex D + +## Interworking IP text devices with V.151 gateways + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +### D.1 Introduction + +Some non-gateway IP devices in the network that do not have means of modulating or demodulating PSTN textphone signals, such as IVR systems, voicemail systems, IP phones, or other devices, may support the transmission of real-time text over IP networks and, ideally, interwork with V.151-compliant gateways in order to provide a means through which users of PSTN textphone devices can communicate with those IP devices. This class of devices is referred to herein as an "IP text device" (ITD). This annex defines the procedures that may be used in order to allow for such interworking between V.151 gateways and ITDs. + +### D.2 Exchanging capabilities and opening media streams + +When establishing a call, an ITD shall advertise support for ToIP in accordance with Annex B or Annex C, with one notable important exception: the ITD shall not include a list of supported modulations. Absence of the list of modulations shall be used as an indicator to the V.151 gateway that the remote side is an ITD. + +Further, ITD devices shall not utilize SSEs in order to control state transition to ToIP. Rather, once a media flow is established to transport T.140 characters, either the gateway or the ITD may transmit text immediately and without further negotiation. Payload type switching is used to transition between audio and text relay modes. + +In general, ITDs transmit text characters when communicating with other ITDs using [b-IETF RFC 4103], which specifies the establishment of a separate RTP stream specifically for transmitting text characters. However, since PSTN gateway devices interleave audio and text data, ITDs need to support both [b-IETF RFC 4103] to interwork with other ITDs and V.151 for communicating with PSTN gateways. As such, ITDs shall indicate support for both transport methods when exchanging capability information. + +Further, when H.323-based ITDs utilize the Fast Connect procedures to offer media streams, those systems should offer proposals for both [b-IETF RFC 4103] and V.151 (refer to Annexes C and G of [ITU-T H.323]). Those proposals would be separate proposals within the fastStart SEQUENCE transmitted to the receiver. As an abbreviated example, an H.323 device might send the following three forward logical channel proposals in fastStart (the proposed media format(s) within a single OLC are shown within braces): + +{ G.711, V.151 }, { G.711, RFC 4103 } + +If the called device is an ITD, it may accept the G.711 proposal to establish an audio stream and the RFC 4103 for text. The fastStart response would contain: + +{ G.711 }, { RFC 4103 } + +If the called device is a gateway, it would accept the proposal for G.711 and V.151/Annex E data interleaved within the same media stream. The fastStart response would contain: + +{ G.711, V.151 } + +The foregoing does not preclude the use of H.245 logical channel signalling to open compatible media streams and merely serves as an illustration. + +Similar logic follows for SDP-based systems. Consider the following abbreviated example SDP that might be found in an offer sent by an ITD: + +``` +m=audio 7200 RTP/AVP 0 98 +a=rtpmap:98 t140c/8000 +a=fmtp:98 cps=20 +m=text 7202 RTP/AVP 99 +a=rtpmap:99 t140/1000 +a=fmtp:99 cps=20 +``` + +If the answering device is another ITD, it would accept the RFC 4103 stream and remove the V.151 (t140c) proposal, as shown in this response: + +``` +m=audio 7200 RTP/AVP 0 +m=text 7202 RTP/AVP 99 +a=rtpmap:99 t140/1000 +a=fmtp:99 cps=20 +``` + +If the answering device is a gateway, it would accept the V.151 stream and indicate that does not wish to utilize RFC 4103 by setting the port to zero (0), as illustrated below: + +``` +m=audio 7200 RTP/AVP 0 98 +a=rtpmap:98 t140c/8000 +a=fmtp:98 cps=20 +m=text 0 RTP/AVP 99 +``` + +Note that while the use of RFC 2198 redundancy or other fault tolerance scheme is not shown in these abbreviated examples, appropriate mechanisms should be employed to protect the transmission of the text stream in accordance with this Recommendation. + +### **D.3 State transition and text handling** + +The following description assumes that a V.151-compliant gateway is in communication with an ITD and media flows have been established to transport text over IP in accordance with Annex E. + +When the gateway compliant to this annex detects a PSTN textphone that it supports using text relay, it shall autonomously connect to the textphone. After connection, the gateway shall decode the characters received and transmit those to the ITD, giving proper respect to the maximum character-per-second (CPS) parameter advertised by the ITD. Determining the type of PSTN textphone device in use is the responsibility of the gateway and the ITD need not concern itself with what kind of PSTN textphone device is connected to the gateway. + +Likewise, when the ITD sends characters to the gateway using TR payload type, the gateway shall perform a probing, as necessary, to determine the type of PSTN device connected, if any. While probing, the gateway shall buffer any characters received and transmit those when probing completes and the gateway is connected to the text phone. The size of the character buffer is a matter of implementation, but should support the reception and buffering of characters for at least 60 seconds at the specified maximum character-per-second (CPS) value signalled to the ITD. + +If the gateway does not support the modulation used by the PSTN textphone device, the gateway may transmit the received textphone signals via VBD or the audio stream, depending on the capabilities of the ITD. Further, the gateway may simply discard characters received from the ITD or transmit them to the PSTN textphone device using a pre-provisioned modulation. + +![Sequence diagram showing text relay call flow between T1, G1, and ITD. T1 sends PTP response probing and CHAR to G1. G1 sends Auto-mode probing to T1 and CHAR to ITD. ITD sends PT = Annex E to G1. A legend indicates yellow boxes are text relayed signals.](12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant T1 + participant G1 + participant ITD + + T1->>G1: PTP response probing + T1->>G1: CHAR + G1->>T1: Auto-mode probing + G1->>ITD: CHAR + ITD->>G1: PT = Annex E + +``` + +Legend: Text relayed signals + +V.151(06)\_FD.1 + +Sequence diagram showing text relay call flow between T1, G1, and ITD. T1 sends PTP response probing and CHAR to G1. G1 sends Auto-mode probing to T1 and CHAR to ITD. ITD sends PT = Annex E to G1. A legend indicates yellow boxes are text relayed signals. + +NOTE – Automode probing as defined in Figure 2b of [ITU-T V.18]. The character(s) sent in the Annex E payload by ITD should be used in the auto-mode probing sequence. Further characters received from ITD shall be buffered by G1 until connection is established with T1. Upon connection with T1, G1 shall transmit all buffered characters. + +**Figure D.1 – Example text relay call flow for ITD/gateway text relay interoperability** + +## Annex E + +## Payload format and signaling syntax for real-time text transported within an audio stream + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation) + +### E.1 Overview + +This annex defines the payload format specification for transporting real-time text over IP networks within an audio stream. The payload format for these packets utilizes ITU-T Rec. T.140 for the character encoding. Characters are transmitting through an audio stream, either switched with voice packets or in parallel to voice packets. + +### E.2 Payload format + +When transporting real-time text within an audio steam, text packets are differentiated from audio packets, SSE messages, DTMF signals, or other packets by the payload type value negotiated during session establishment or when the session is later modified. Text packets shall be assigned a payload type value that allows the endpoint to unambiguously recognize text packets from other packets transmitted within the audio stream. + +The real-time text packets shall utilize T.140 for character encoding, transported using the real-time transport protocol (RTP), and shall be encoded as shown in Figure E.1. + +![Figure E.1: Payload format diagram showing the structure of an RTP packet for real-time text. The diagram is a horizontal bar divided into fields with bit indices 0 to 31 above. The fields are: v=2 (bits 0-1), P (bit 2), X (bit 3), CC=0 (bits 4-7), M (bit 8), PT (bits 9-15), Sequence Number (bits 16-31). Below the bar, the fields are grouped: Timestamp (bits 16-31), Synchronization Source (SSRC) Identifier (bits 16-31), T.140 Block Counter (bits 16-23), and T.140-Encoded Data Block (bits 24-31).](5c3dd31372f59e15250f0ab1613ca485_img.jpg) + +| | | | | +|------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|------| +| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | 0 1 | +| v=2 | P | X | CC=0 | +| M | PT | | | +| Sequence Number | | | | +| Timestamp | | | | +| Synchronization Source (SSRC) Identifier | | | | +| T.140 Block Counter | | | | +| T.140-Encoded Data Block | | | | + +Figure E.1: Payload format diagram showing the structure of an RTP packet for real-time text. The diagram is a horizontal bar divided into fields with bit indices 0 to 31 above. The fields are: v=2 (bits 0-1), P (bit 2), X (bit 3), CC=0 (bits 4-7), M (bit 8), PT (bits 9-15), Sequence Number (bits 16-31). Below the bar, the fields are grouped: Timestamp (bits 16-31), Synchronization Source (SSRC) Identifier (bits 16-31), T.140 Block Counter (bits 16-23), and T.140-Encoded Data Block (bits 24-31). + +Figure E.1 – Payload format + +The definition of the first 3 octets is found in Section 5.1 of IETF RFC 3550. Implementations shall adhere to the following usage of these fields: + +This M-bit shall be set to '1' for the initial packet transmitted for any given SSRC value presented on the wire and shall be set to '1' following a period of 'silence' where no RTP packets are transmitted. In all other cases where packets are transmitted successively, this bit shall be set to '0'. A period of 'silence' is defined to be more than 300 ms without transmitting a packet. + +The payload type (PT) field shall contain a dynamic payload type value negotiated by the two endpoints. + +The sequence number and timestamp fields shall increase in accordance with IETF RFC 3550. + +The SSRC used for text should be the same SSRC value as used for other audio, allowing for synchronized interleaving of audio and text. This means that the clock rate used for audio transmission should be the same rate as used for text packets. + +There may be cases, however, where it is desired to transmit audio and text within the same stream in parallel and having overlapping timestamps. For example, if a user speaks while typing at the same time using devices that enable simultaneous voice and text, both audio and text may be presented to the network. In such cases, a separate SSRC may be used in order to separate the voice + +source from the text source and allow for overlapping timestamps and different sequence number spaces. Such usage of multiple payloads with an RTP stream is discussed in IETF RFC 3550. + +The actual payload of the RTP packet is comprised of a T.140 block counter and a chunk of T.140-encoded data. Those two components of the payload are described in the following clauses. + +#### **E.2.1 T.140 block counter** + +The T.140 block counter is similar in purpose to the sequence number and is necessary since text packets and audio packets may share the same sequence number space. Without this counter, it would not otherwise be possible to detect lost text packets. + +The T.140 block counter shall be initialized to zero for the first text packet transmitted and, once passing the value 0xFFFF, shall be reset to zero. + +Devices that receive a text packet containing a T.140 block counter that has incremented higher than expected shall assume that the difference between the recently received counter value and the expected counter value indicates the number of lost text packets. Note, however, that there may be multiple characters within a text packet, so this does not serve to indicate the number of lost characters. + +#### **E.2.2 T.140-Encoded Data Block** + +The T.140-encoded data block ("T.140 block") contains text information as described in ITU-T Rec. T.140. The contents of this field shall be UTF-8 encoded and shall include no extra framing. + +It should be noted that, in most cases, this field is comprised of one or more text characters. However, it is permissible to have zero characters for the purpose of enabling transmission of redundant data packets as discussed in clause E.3. It should also be noted that, while most elements within this field constitute single characters, some elements are multiple-character sequences. Any composite character sequence (CSS) elements should be placed in a single RTP packet. + +### **E.3 Use of redundancy** + +Use of redundancy, such as the redundancy mechanism described in [IETF RFC 2198], provides a high degree of resiliency in the face of packet loss. When transmitting a constant stream of packets, [IETF RFC 2198] is quite clear on the contents of the data packets, including the primary and redundant parts of the RFC 2198 packet. + +However, in cases where there is "silence" for a period of time, [IETF RFC 2198] is not explicitly clear about how a device should deliver redundant data. More specifically, [IETF RFC 2198] requires that all packets contain a primary encoding, though during a period of "silence" there would not be information available to transmit as primary data. For this reason, when transmitting text as redundant information and without any new text to transmit, devices shall transmit RTP packets that contain no "primary" data: both the "T.140 block counter" and "T.140 block" shall be absent from the RTP payload. This absent primary T.140 data is referred to as an "empty T.140 block". + +Figure C.2 shows what an RFC 2198 redundancy packet might look like when the primary encoding is absent (i.e., there is an empty T.140 block) and a single redundant encoding of a previously transmitted T.140 block ("R") is present. It is important to note that the sequence number for the RFC 2198 packet continues to increase, as specified in [IETF RFC 2198] and IETF RFC 3550, so that it is possible for the system and network to accurately measure overall packet loss. However, character loss is detected through missing T.140 block counters, not gaps in the RTP packet sequence numbers. In this way, if a packet is lost, then the character may be recovered through these redundant transmissions without any apparent loss observed by the user. + +A device should not re-transmit an empty T.140 block as a redundant encoding, as doing so merely consumes bandwidth unnecessarily and does not improve the robustness of the system. + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|------------------------------------------|------------|---|---|------|---|---|---|---|-----------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|----------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| +| 0 | | | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| v=2 | | P | X | CC=0 | | | | M | "RED" PT | | | | | | Sequence Number of Primary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Timestamp of Primary Encoding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| Synchronization Source (SSRC) Identifier | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1 | "t140c" PT | | | | | | | | Timestamp offset of "R" | | | | | | | | | | | | "R" Block Length | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | "t140c" PT | | | | | | | | T.140 Block Counter for "R" | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| T.140 Block "R" | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +**Figure E.2 – RFC 2198 redundancy packet with empty T.140 block** + +## Appendix I + +## Background to PSTN text telephony + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +Text telephone systems were implemented mainly for distant conversation with deaf, hard-of-hearing, speech-impaired and deaf-blind users. The text telephone systems offer a real-time, character-by-character, conversation in text, optionally combinable with voice. The text telephone service is described generally in [ITU-T F.700] and [ITU-T F.703] and user needs are described in [b-ETSI ETR 333], *Human Factors, Text Telephony; Basic user requirements and recommendations*. + +With the PSTN, there are seven different, openly specified signalling methods used in text telephony. These signalling methods are country-specific. The signalling methods are TIA-825A (Baudot), DTMF, EDT, V.21, Bell103, Minitel and V.18. Each uses a different modulation and character encoding in the transmission of text. The methods are described in the annexes of [ITU-T V.18]. + +[ITU-T V.18] is an auto-mode mechanism that attempts to enable communication with all the legacy mode of operation at the physical layer level. If both end-point text telephones are V.18, they encode their data using the character set, defined in ITU-T Rec. T.140. [ITU-T V.21] is the common or native modulation for V.18, while ITU-T Rec. V.61 is specified for use of simultaneous voice and text. + +There also exist several proprietary flavours of the existing standardized modulations, which are not part of [ITU-T V.18]. + +## Appendix II + +## ToIP call discrimination call flows + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +### II.1 Scope + +This appendix contains a set of example call flow diagrams for this Recommendation. It does not represent a complete set. *If there is any conflict between these diagrams and the SDL contained in the main body of the Recommendation, the SDL will govern.* + +The following diagrams illustrate ToIP call flows. In the diagrams: + +- the white vertical rectangles under the ToIP endpoints (G1 and G2) give the state of the respective endpoint; +- the shaded vertical rectangles under the text telephony terminals (T1 and T2) and the ToIP endpoints (G1 and G2) give the signals that are being transmitted by the respective Terminal or endpoint; +- while in audio and VBD mode, the ToIP endpoints are continually transmitting and receiving audio CODEC packets as defined elsewhere in this Recommendation. For clarity, these packets are only explicitly shown when special circumstances surround them. + +### II.2 Scenarios for call discrimination flows + +Table II.1 lists all possible scenarios of PTP devices and gateway types. Each of these scenarios is considered in the following clauses. + +**Table II.1 – Possible PSTN text phone connection scenarios** + +| T1 Type
(calling) | T2 Type
(called) | T1 $\cap$
G1 $\neq$ 0 | T2 $\cap$
G2 $\neq$ 0 | Connect
mode | +|----------------------|---------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| +| V.18 | V.18 | Y | Y | TR | +| V.18 | V.18 | N | Y | SSEs:
TR
Else:
VBD | +| V.18 | V.18 | Y | N | SSEs:
TR
Else:
VBD | +| V.18 | V.18 | N | N | Same as scenario 3 | +| FDX | V.18 | Y | Y | TR unless T1 is Bell 103 and G2 does not support Bell 103 | +| FDX | V.18 | N | Y | VBD | +| FDX | V.18 | Y | N | Same as scenario 5 | +| FDX | V.18 | N | N | VBD | +| V.18 | FDX | Y | Y | TR unless no SSEs and G1 and G2 do not both support T2's mode | +| V.18 | FDX | N | Y | Same as scenario 9 | + +**Table II.1 – Possible PSTN text phone connection scenarios** + +| T1 Type
(calling)
| T2 Type
(called)
| T1 \cap
G1 \neq 0
| T2 \cap
G2 \neq 0
| Connect
mode
| +|------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| V.18 | FDX | Y | N | VBD | +| V.18 | FDX | N | N | VBD | +| FDX | FDX | Y | Y | TR
VBD if G1 does not support T2 and T1 = T2. | +| FDX | FDX | N | Y | VBD
No connect if T1 != T2 | +| FDX | FDX | Y | N | Same as scenario 14 | +| FDX | FDX | N | N | Same as scenario 14 | +| HDX | V.18 | Y | Y | TR | +| HDX | V.18 | N | Y | VBD | +| HDX | V.18 | Y | N | VBD | +| HDX | V.18 | N | N | VBD | +| V.18 | HDX | Y | Y | TR | +| V.18 | HDX | N | Y | VBD | +| V.18 | HDX | Y | N | VBD | +| V.18 | HDX | N | N | VBD | +| HDX | HDX | Y | Y | TR | +| HDX | HDX | N | Y | VBD
No connect if T1 != T2 | +| HDX | HDX | Y | N | Same as scenario 26 | +| HDX | HDX | N | N | Same as scenario 26 | +| FDX | HDX | Y | Y | TR | +| FDX | HDX | N | Y | No connect | +| FDX | HDX | Y | N | No connect | +| FDX | HDX | N | N | No connect | +| HDX | FDX | Y | Y | TR | +| HDX | FDX | N | Y | No connect | +| HDX | FDX | Y | N | No connect | +| HDX | FDX | N | N | No connect | + +### **II.3 Scenarios with SSE protocol being used** + +#### **II.3.1 Scenario #1** + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports V.18 native mode + +G2 = supports V.18 native mode + +![Figure II.1 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 1 of 2). The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 (CI/XCI) sends a signal to G1 (CI/XCI). G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2 (CI/XCI). G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TP:p') to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:ANSam) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. T2 (ANSam) sends ANSsam to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to T2. T2 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. T2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. T2 sends V.21(H) to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent Text relayed signals and hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Note 1: PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD. Note 2: CI/XCI.](a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. If not detected, there will be up to 3 seconds of additional delay before ANSsam is generated. + +Figure II.1 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 1 of 2). The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 (CI/XCI) sends a signal to G1 (CI/XCI). G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2 (CI/XCI). G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TP:p') to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:ANSam) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. T2 (ANSam) sends ANSsam to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to T2. T2 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. T2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. T2 sends V.21(H) to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent Text relayed signals and hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Note 1: PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD. Note 2: CI/XCI. + +**Figure II.1 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 1 of 2)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it exits the TP state via an SSE from G2. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state. The answering auto-mode probing state would consist of G2 listening for PTP signals from T2. Since T2 is a V.18 PTP answering terminal, it will generate ANSsam signal either immediately after the CI/XCI sequence if it is detector, or within 3 seconds if the CI/XCI is not detected. Upon detection of the ANSsam signal from T2 by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR:V.18) indicating that it has detected ANSsam signal from T2 and that T2 is a V.18 modem and that G1 should start its text relay connect sequence. G2 will then start the V.8 connect sequence with T2 (since G2 supports native V.18). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:V.18) from G2, G1 will start a V.8 connect sequence with T1 and successfully connect with it. At this time, G1 and G2 are free to transmit receive characters via RTP. Any characters that are received by the gateway from the remote gateway before the gateway has completed the start-up (or probing) sequence with its local PTP will be buffered and sent after establishing connection with the local PTP. + +![Figure II.2 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 2 of 2). This diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between two gateways (G1 and G2) and two terminals (T1 and T2) during a call setup. G1 and G2 are represented by vertical bars with various signal blocks. T1 and T2 are represented by vertical bars with various signal blocks. The diagram shows the flow of signals: T1 sends CM and CJ to G1; G1 sends ANSam and JM to T1. G2 sends ANSam and JM to T2. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T1. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T2. The diagram also shows the flow of signals between G1 and G2: G1 sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) and SSE(VBD:p') to G2; G2 sends SSE(TR:CJ) and SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. The diagram includes a legend: Yellow boxes represent Text relayed signals, and Blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. A note indicates that the silence period between CJ/JM signal and the generation of V.21 carrier must be 75 ± 5 ms.](cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg) + +NOTE – As per V.8 specification, the silence period between CJ/JM signal and the generation of V.21 carrier must be $75 \pm 5$ ms. + +Figure II.2 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 2 of 2). This diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between two gateways (G1 and G2) and two terminals (T1 and T2) during a call setup. G1 and G2 are represented by vertical bars with various signal blocks. T1 and T2 are represented by vertical bars with various signal blocks. The diagram shows the flow of signals: T1 sends CM and CJ to G1; G1 sends ANSam and JM to T1. G2 sends ANSam and JM to T2. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T1. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T2. The diagram also shows the flow of signals between G1 and G2: G1 sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) and SSE(VBD:p') to G2; G2 sends SSE(TR:CJ) and SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. The diagram includes a legend: Yellow boxes represent Text relayed signals, and Blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. A note indicates that the silence period between CJ/JM signal and the generation of V.21 carrier must be 75 ± 5 ms. + +**Figure II.2 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (SSE) (sheet 2 of 2)** + +##### Description + +This call flow takes into consideration the case where CI/XCI is not detected by G1, possibly because the ANSam tone was generated first due to the manner in which the call was established. G2, upon detecting the ANSam, will initiate a transition to VBD mode. While in VBD mode, both gateways will monitor the V.8 signals at their PCM interfaces, G1 seeing the CM signal indicating a PTP device and G2 seeing the JM signal indicating a PTP device. At the end of CJ reception, G1 will initiate a transition to text relay mode through the generation of an SSE(TR) to G2. The transition from VBD to text relay mode needs to be handled so that the V.21 carrier generated by the gateways meets the $75 \pm 5$ ms as required by [ITU-T V.8]. + +For the case where the end of CI/XCI corresponds to the beginning of ANSam such that there is a cross-over of TP and VBD SSEs in the IP network, per the SSE protocol definition the gateways will end up in VBD mode. As this diagram demonstrates, in this case the gateway will eventually go to text relay mode at the end of V.8. + +#### II.3.2 Scenario #2 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (V.23 in this example) + +G2 = support V.18 native mode + +![Figure II.3 – Scenario #2 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSAm) to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G2 sends PT = TR(Char) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(Char) to T1. T1 sends 390 Hz carrier to G1. G1 sends 2100 Hz ANS to G2. G2 sends CM to G1. G2 sends CJ to G1. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G1. G1 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends CHAR to T2. T2 sends V.21(H) to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) to G2. The diagram also includes a legend for Text relayed signals (yellow) and VBD signals (blue hatched).](c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. If not detected, there will be up to 3 seconds of additional delay before ANSAm is generated. + +Figure II.3 – Scenario #2 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSAm) to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G2 sends PT = TR(Char) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(Char) to T1. T1 sends 390 Hz carrier to G1. G1 sends 2100 Hz ANS to G2. G2 sends CM to G1. G2 sends CJ to G1. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G1. G1 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends CHAR to T2. T2 sends V.21(H) to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) to G2. The diagram also includes a legend for Text relayed signals (yellow) and VBD signals (blue hatched). + +**Figure II.3 – Scenario #2 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state. Since T2 is a V.18 PTP answering terminal, it will generate ANSAm signal either immediately after the CI/XCI sequence if it is detector, or within 3 seconds if the CI/XCI is not detected. Upon detection of the ANSAm signal from T2 by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR:V.18) indicating that it has detected ANSAm signal from T2 and that T2 is a V.18 modem and that G1 should start its text relay connect sequence. G2 will then start the V.8 connect sequence with T2 (since G2 supports native V.18). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:V.18) from G2, G1 will start a connect sequence with T1. Since it knows that T1 is a V.18 PTP terminal, G1 will successfully be able to connect with it using the FDX modulation scheme that G1 supports. G1 starts the answering sequence for its supported modulation. At this time, G1 and G2 are free to transmit receive characters via RTP. Any characters that are received by the gateway from the remote gateway before the gateway has completed the start-up (or probing) sequence with its local PTP will be buffered and sent after establishing connection with the local PTP. + +#### II.3.3 Scenario #3 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = support V.18 native mode + +G2 = supports FDX mode (V.21 in this example) + +![Figure II.4 – Scenario #3 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 (V.18 PTP) sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSAm) to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:p') to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends CHAR to G1. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. T2 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on VBD usage and CI/XCI detection.](28085f681b9fff76a53c5b8b32338ee1_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. If not detected, there will be up to 3 seconds of additional delay before ANSAm is generated. + +Figure II.4 – Scenario #3 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 (V.18 PTP) sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSAm) to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:p') to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends CHAR to G1. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. T2 sends CHAR to G2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on VBD usage and CI/XCI detection. + +**Figure II.4 – Scenario #3 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE indicating a new mode from G2. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state. Since T2 is a V.18 PTP answering terminal, it will generate ANSAm signal either immediately after the CI/XCI sequence if it is detector, or within 3 seconds if the CI/XCI is not detected. Upon detection of the ANSAm signal from T2 by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR:V.18) indicating that it has detected ANSAm signal from T2 and that T2 is a V.18 modem and that G1 should start its text relay connect sequence. G2 will then continue with its answering auto-mode probing procedures, waiting for V.21 mark to be generated by T2 to respond with V.21 mark. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:V.18) from G2, G1 will reply with an SSE(TR:p') completing the switch to text relay mode and it will start a V.18 answering modem sequence to connect with T1. Any characters that are received by the gateway from the remote gateway before the gateway has completed the start-up (or probing) sequence with its local PTP will be buffered and sent after establishing connection with the local PTP. + +#### II.3.4 Scenario #4 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (V.23 in this example) + +G2 = support HDX modulation (Baudot in this example) + +![Figure II.5 – Scenario #4 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between four entities: T1 (V.18 PTP), G1 (V.151-compliant gateway), G2 (gateway), and T2 (V.18 PTP). T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSam) to G1 and SSE(TR:p') to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to T1. G2 sends Baudot to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. The diagram also shows a 2100 Hz ANS signal from G1 to T1, a 1300 Hz carrier signal from G1 to T1, and a 390 Hz carrier signal from T1 to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on VBD usage and CI/XCI detection.](3e8e3bdb3d90f0856266d4eaf36abba1_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. If not detected, there will be up to 3 seconds of additional delay before ANSAm is generated. + +V.151(06)\_FII.5 + +Figure II.5 – Scenario #4 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram illustrates the signaling sequence between four entities: T1 (V.18 PTP), G1 (V.151-compliant gateway), G2 (gateway), and T2 (V.18 PTP). T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:ANSam) to G1 and SSE(TR:p') to T2. T2 sends ANSAm to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to T1. G2 sends Baudot to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. The diagram also shows a 2100 Hz ANS signal from G1 to T1, a 1300 Hz carrier signal from G1 to T1, and a 390 Hz carrier signal from T1 to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on VBD usage and CI/XCI detection. + +**Figure II.5 – Scenario #4 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2 indicating a new mode (either VBD or text relay). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state. Since T2 is a V.18 PTP answering terminal, it will generate ANSAm signal either immediately + +after the CI/XCI sequence if it is detected, or within 3 seconds if the CI/XCI is not detected. Upon detection of the ANSam signal from T2 by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR:V.18) indicating that it has detected ANSam signal from T2 and that T2 is a V.18 modem and that G1 should start its text relay auto-mode probing sequence. Since G2 does not support native V.18 mode, it will not respond to the ANSam generated by T2, but will wait until it detects a PTP modulation that it supports (Baudot in this example). After detecting the Baudot probing signal from T2, G2 will immediately respond with Baudot, triggering T2 to go into Baudot mode. The Baudot probing character that was detected by G2 is sent to G1 using text relay mode. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:V.18) from G2, G1 will start a connect sequence with T1. Since it knows that T1 is a V.18 PTP terminal, G1 will successfully be able to connect with it using the FDX modulation scheme that G1 supports. At this time, G1 and G2 are free to transmit receive characters via RTP. Any characters that are received by the gateway before the gateway has completed the start-up (or probing) sequence with its local PTP will be buffered and sent after establishing connection with the local PTP. + +#### II.3.5 Scenario #5 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +G2 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +![Figure II.6 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The diagram illustrates the sequence of signals and data flow. T2 sends ANSam and V.18 probing signals to G2. G2 sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to T1. T1 sends 2225 Hz MARK and 1270 Hz MARK signals to G1. G1 sends 2225 Hz MARK and CHAR signals to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:CHAR) and PT = TR(CHAR) to T2. T2 sends 2225 Hz MARK and CHAR signals to G2. The diagram also includes a legend for Text relayed signals (yellow) and VBD signals (blue).](ad555483986d7170a46ce72d164b5bc8_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +NOTE 2 – SSE(TR) is only sent by G1 at this point if G2 supports T1's modulation; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +V.151(06)\_FII.6 + +Figure II.6 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The diagram illustrates the sequence of signals and data flow. T2 sends ANSam and V.18 probing signals to G2. G2 sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to T1. T1 sends 2225 Hz MARK and 1270 Hz MARK signals to G1. G1 sends 2225 Hz MARK and CHAR signals to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:CHAR) and PT = TR(CHAR) to T2. T2 sends 2225 Hz MARK and CHAR signals to G2. The diagram also includes a legend for Text relayed signals (yellow) and VBD signals (blue). + +Figure II.6 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (SSE) + +##### Description + +Since T2 is a V.18 answering PTP, it will generate ANSam after 3 seconds (because CI/XCI was not received). Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect ANSam and initiate a switch to VBD mode. T2 is allowed to probe T1 using VBD mode. G2 does not respond to any of the T2 probing sequences, even those that represent modulations that G2 supports since it has not been established that an end-to-end text relay connection can be successfully made between all gateways and PTP devices. Upon detection by G1 of a PTP FDX modulation probing response from T1 that it supports, G1 will send an SSE(TP:X) to G2 (X is the modulation that was detected, Bell 103 in this example) only if G2 also supports this modulation. If G2 does not support this modulation, the gateways stay in VBD mode and the PTP devices connect using VBD for the entire session. In the case where T1 and T2 are not PTP, but data modems, requiring that both PSTN legs of the call be of the same modulation type will result in successful connection for data modems as well as PTP devices using proper character treatments. + +#### II.3.6 Scenario #6 + +- T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) +- T2 = V.18 PTP +- G1 = does not support modulation used by T1 +- G2 = don't care + +![Figure II.7 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (SSE).](212c50c4e3d043c989037a01e13c1a98_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. +1. T2 sends ANSam. G2 detects it and sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) to G1. G1 responds with SSE(VBD:p'). +2. G1 sends ANSam to T1. +3. T2 begins V.18 probing. This is passed through G2 and G1 to T1. +4. T1 responds with V.21(H) MARK and CHAR. +5. G1 receives this and passes it as V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to G2 via PT = VBD. +6. G2 passes V.21(H) MARK and CHAR to T2. +7. T2 responds with V.21(L) MARK and CHAR, which is passed back through G2 and G1 to T1 as V.21(H) MARK and CHAR. + +**Legend:** +  Text relayed signals +  VBD signals + +NOTE – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +Figure II.7 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (SSE). + +**Figure II.7 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### **Description** + +Since T2 is a V.18 answering PTP, it will generate ANSam after 3 seconds (because CI/XCI was not received). Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect ANSam and initiate a switch to VBD mode. T2 is allowed to probe T1 using VBD mode. G2 does not respond to any of the T2 probing sequences, even those that represent modulations that G2 supports since it has not been established that a end-to-end text relay connection can be successfully made between all gateways and PTP devices. Since the modulation that is responded to by T1 is not supported by G1, G1 does not initiate a switch to text relay mode and the connection remains in VBD mode for the entire call. + +#### **II.3.7 Scenario #7** + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +G2 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) (Does not support native V.18) + +##### **Description** + +This scenario plays out identical to scenario #5. The only difference between these scenarios is that G2 does not support native V.18 mode, but the call flow is identical. + +#### **II.3.8 Scenario #8** + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = does not support modulation used by T1 + +G2 = does not support native V.18 mode + +##### **Description** + +This scenario plays out identical to scenario #6. The only difference between these scenarios is that G2 does not support native V.18 mode, but the call flow is identical. + +#### **II.3.9 Scenarios #9 and #10** + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 (V.21 in this example) + +![Figure II.8 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G2 sends ANS to T2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. G2 sends CHAR to T2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to T2. G1 sends PT = TR (CHAR) to G2. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 through 5 provide additional context for the diagram.](87c64bd7d33fca8b9b29228c80ddf175_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – ANS tone is optional. + +NOTE 4 – Start originate, mode answer probing upon reception of SSE(TR) with same modulation as supported by T2 if available at G1. + +NOTE 5 – G1 buffers characters received from G2 until it has completed connection with T1. + +V.151(06)\_FIL.8 + +Figure II.8 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G2 sends ANS to T2. G2 sends V.21(H) MARK to T2. G2 sends CHAR to T2. G2 sends V.21(L) MARK to T2. G1 sends PT = TR (CHAR) to G2. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G1 sends V.21(L) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 through 5 provide additional context for the diagram. + +**Figure II.8 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2 indicating a new mode (either VBD or text relay). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state. Since T2 is a V.21 PTP answering terminal, it can either generate ANS or go straight to V.21 MARK generation (ANS signal is optional). Upon detection of the V.21 MARK from T2 by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR:V.18) indicating that it has detected a valid PTP signal from T2 and that G1 should start its text relay auto-mode probing sequence. G2 will then connect with T2 and start to transmit receive characters using text relay mode. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:V.18) from G2, G1 will start a connect sequence with T1. Since it knows that T1 is a V.18 PTP terminal, G1 will successfully be able to connect with it using the first modulation scheme used in the probing sequence. G1 should use the modulation scheme being used by T2 and G2 if it is supported by G1 (i.e., attempt to match modulations at both call legs). Any characters that are received by the gateway from the remote gateway before the gateway has completed the start-up (or probing) sequence with its local PTP will be buffered and sent after establishing connection with the local PTP. + +**II.3.10 Scenarios #11 and #12** + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = does not support modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.9 – Scenarios #11 and #12 call flow diagram (SSE)](3ce04f1c7128814978c6b34d654a25cc_img.jpg) + +``` + + sequenceDiagram + participant T1 + participant G1 + participant G2 + participant T2 + + Note over T1, T2: Note 1: PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD + T1->>G1: CI/XCI + G1-->>G2: SSE(TP:CI/XCI) + Note right of G2: Note 2 + G2->>T2: CI/XCI + G2-->>G1: SSE(TP:p') + Note over G2: Note 3 + T2->>G2: ANS + Note over G2: Note 4 + G2-->>G1: SSE(VBD:TO) + G1-->>G2: SSE(VBD:p') + T2->>G2: V.21(H) MARK + G1->>T1: V.21(H) MARK + T1->>G1: V.21(L) MARK + G1->>G2: PT = VBD + G2->>T2: V.21(L) MARK + T2->>G2: CHAR + G1->>T1: CHAR + T1->>G1: CHAR + G1->>G2: PT = VBD + G2->>T2: CHAR + T2->>G2: V.21(H) MARK + G1->>T1: V.21(L) MARK + G2->>T2: V.21(L) MARK + +``` + +V.151(06)\_FII.9 + +Figure II.9 – Scenarios #11 and #12 call flow diagram (SSE) + +- Text relayed signals +- VBD signals +- NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. +- NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. +- NOTE 3 – ANS tone is optional. +- NOTE 4 – G2 times out looking for valid PTP signal that it supports. + +**Figure II.9 – Scenarios #11 and #12 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +**Description** + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2 indicating a new mode (either VBD or text relay). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 enters into an answering auto-mode probing state, searching for a signal that it detects as a valid PTP signal. Since G2 does not support the modulation supported by T2, it will detect a non-text relay support signal in the answering auto-mode probing state and generate an SSE(VBD:TO) to G1. This will transition the call to VBD mode and the connection with stay in this mode for the remainder of the PTP session. + +**ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006)**      59 + +#### II.3.11 Scenarios #13 and #14 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (same as T1) + +G1 = supports modulation of T1 + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.10 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the sequence of events between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T2 initiates the call with ANS, followed by V.21(H) MARK and CHAR. G2 receives these and sends SSE(VBD:ANS) and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. G1 then sends SSE(TP:V.21 ch1) and SSE(TP:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:V.21 ch2) and SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 then sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to T2. The diagram also shows V.21(L) MARK and CHAR signals between T1 and G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1-4 provide additional context on the optional generation of ANS, the transition to VBD mode, and the conditions for sending SSE(TR).](74d23510f27b21403a7be84820821863_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – Generation of ANS signal by T2 is optional. + NOTE 2 – If ANS was not generated by T2, G2 shall initiate transition to VBD upon V.21 mark detection. + NOTE 3 – G1 responds with SSE(TR) only if it detects T1 to be same modulation as T2. If not, G1 responds with SSE(VBD). + NOTE 4 – Only send SSE(TR) if G1 supports modulation of T2; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +Figure II.10 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the sequence of events between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T2 initiates the call with ANS, followed by V.21(H) MARK and CHAR. G2 receives these and sends SSE(VBD:ANS) and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. G1 then sends SSE(TP:V.21 ch1) and SSE(TP:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:V.21 ch2) and SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 then sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to T2. The diagram also shows V.21(L) MARK and CHAR signals between T1 and G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1-4 provide additional context on the optional generation of ANS, the transition to VBD mode, and the conditions for sending SSE(TR). + +**Figure II.10 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2 being the answering PTP device will initiate the generation of a FDX signal, optionally preceded by the ANS signal. Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, upon detection of the ANS tone, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD mode. When G2 detects the carrier for a FDX modulation that it supports for text, it shall generate a SSE(TP) if G1 has also indicated support for this modulation. If G1 does not support the modulation used by T2, the connection will remain in VBD for the duration of the call. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP), G1 shall enter an originate mode auto-probing sequence, starting with the modulation indicated in the SSE(TP) from G2. Since T1 is the same modulation as T2, G1 will connect with T1 using this modulation. Upon detection of the response signal from T1, G1 will generate an SSE(TR) to G2 indicating that the connection has transitioned to text relay mode. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR) from G1, G2 will start the connect sequence with T2. + +In this scenario, T1 and T2 modulations must be the same for the PTP connection to be established. There is no support for protocol conversion in this scenario. Ensuring that T1 and T2 modulations + +are the same allows non-PTP data modems that use the same physical layer modulation to also be supported using relay. + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + T2 = FDX modulation PTP (same as T1) + G1 = supports modulation of T1 + G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.10-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (SSE)](750677d35a0db0f1a6d44ede4e11d347_img.jpg) + +Detailed description of Figure II.10-1: A sequence diagram with four vertical lifelines labeled T1, G1, G2, and T2 from left to right. + - T2 sends a 2225 Hz tone to G2. + - G2 sends SSE(VBD:Tone 2225 Hz) and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. + - G1 sends SSE(TP:Bell103 chan 1) and SSE(TR:Bell 103 chan 2) to G2. + - G2 responds with SSE(TR:V.21 ch2) to G1. + - Data exchange follows: G1 sends PT=TR to G2, and G2 sends PT=TR to G1. + - Signal states are shown in boxes: T1 has 'CHAN 1 MARK' and 'CHAR'; G1 has 'CHAN 2 MARK' and 'CHAR'; G2 has 'CHAN 1 MARK' and 'CHAR'; T2 has '2225 Hz', 'CHAN 2 MARK', and 'CHAR'. + - Legend: Yellow shaded boxes represent 'Text relayed signals'; Blue hatched boxes represent 'VBD signals'. + - A note at the bottom states: 'NOTE – Only send SSE(TR) if G2 supports modulation of T2; otherwise, stay in VBD mode.' + +*V.151(06)\_FII.10(bis)* + +Figure II.10-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (SSE) + +**Figure II.10-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (SSE)** + +**Description** + +Bell 103 is a special case of the FDX to FDX scenario since, unlike other FDX modems such as V.21, the originating modem is first to generate carrier upon detection of the 2225-Hz answer tone. + +T2 being the answering Bell 103 PTP device will initiate the generation of 2225-Hz answer tone. Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, upon detection of the 2225-Hz tone, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD mode. When G1 detects MARK for a Bell 103 originating modem that it supports for text, it shall generate an SSE(TP) if G2 has also indicated support for this modulation. If G2 does not support the modulation used by T2, the connection will remain in VBD for the duration of the call. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP), G2 shall respond with an SSE(TR) to transition the connection into text relay mode and start a connection with T2. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR) from G2, G1 will start the connect sequence with T1. + +**ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006)**      61 + +In this scenario, T1 and T2 modulations must be the same for the PTP connection to be established. There is no support for protocol conversion in this scenario. Ensuring that T1 and T2 modulations are the same allows non-PTP data modems that use the same physical layer modulation to also be supported using relay. + +#### II.3.12 Scenarios #15 and #16 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (same as T1) + +G1 = don't care + +G2 = does not support modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.11 – Scenarios #15 and #16 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are PTP devices using V.21 modulation. G1 is a gateway that doesn't care, and G2 is a gateway that doesn't support T2's modulation. The flow starts with T2 sending an ANS signal to G2. G2 then sends SSE(VBD:ANS) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to T1. G1 then sends V.21(H) MARK to T1. T1 then sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to G1. G1 then sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 then sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T2. T2 then sends V.21(H) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on the ANS signal generation and the transition to VBD mode.](6031b46d356ee24f96bfe37ee2cb7616_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – Generation of ANS signal by T2 is optional. + +NOTE 2 – If ANS was not generated by T2, G2 shall initiate transition to VBD upon V.21 mark detection. + +V.151(06)\_FII.11 + +Figure II.11 – Scenarios #15 and #16 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are PTP devices using V.21 modulation. G1 is a gateway that doesn't care, and G2 is a gateway that doesn't support T2's modulation. The flow starts with T2 sending an ANS signal to G2. G2 then sends SSE(VBD:ANS) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to T1. G1 then sends V.21(H) MARK to T1. T1 then sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to G1. G1 then sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 then sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to T2. T2 then sends V.21(H) MARK to G2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1 and 2 provide additional context on the ANS signal generation and the transition to VBD mode. + +**Figure II.11 – Scenarios #15 and #16 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2 being the answering PTP device will initiate the generation of an FDX signal, optionally preceded by the ANS signal. Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, upon detection of the FDX signal or the ANS tone, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD mode. Since G2 does not support the FDX modulation being used by T2, it will not initiate a transition to text relay mode through generation of SSE(TR). Upon detection of the modulation signal, if the channel is not already in VBD mode, G2 will initiate a transition to VBD mode. When T1 detects the carrier from T1 (since it may support the T1/T2 modulation), it will not initiate a transition to text relay since G2 had indicated that it does not support this modulation. + +In this scenario, T1 and T2 modulations must be the same for the PTP connection to be established. There is no support for protocol conversion in this scenario. + +#### II.3.13 Scenarios #17 and #19 + +T1 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports T1's modulation + +G2 = don't care + +![Figure II.12 – Scenarios #17 and #19 call flow diagram (SSE)](76d19e4271bf243b20d55a98efd51483_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a call flow between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. +1. T2 sends an ANSam signal. +2. G2 detects ANSam and sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to T1 (indicated by red dashed arrows). +3. G1 and T2 enter ANSam state (blue hatched boxes). +4. T2 initiates V.18 probing, which passes through G2 and G1 to T1. +5. T1 responds with a Baudot character. +6. G1 detects Baudot and sends PT = VBD to G2. +7. G1 sends SSE(TP:Baudot) to G2 and SSE(TR:Baudot) to G2. +8. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to T1. +9. G2 sends PT = TR (CHAR) to G1. +10. Text relayed signals (yellow boxes) are exchanged: G1 sends Baudot to T1, and G2 sends Baudot to T2. +Legend: Yellow boxes = Text relayed signals; Blue hatched boxes = VBD signals. + +NOTE 1 – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +NOTE 2 – SSE(TP) is only sent by G1 at this point if G2 is not V.18 native only; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +NOTE 3 – G2 starts auto-mode probing after receiving SSE(TR) from G1. Probing should start with T1 modulation if supported by G2. + +V.151(06)\_FII.12 + +Figure II.12 – Scenarios #17 and #19 call flow diagram (SSE) + +**Figure II.12 – Scenarios #17 and #19 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2 will generate a V.8 ANSam signal at the start of the call. Upon detection of the ANSam, G2 will initiate a transition to VBD mode through generation of a SSE(VBD:ANSam). The V.18 probing is allowed to be performed end-to-end through the VBD channel. G2 will not respond to any probing signals even in cases where it supports the modulation in the probing signals. + +Upon detection of a PTP modulation signal supported by G1 (a Baudot character in this example), G1 shall immediately send an SSE(TP) to G2. In cases where G2 only support V.18 native mode, G1 shall not generate the SSE(TR) and the connection shall remain in VBD mode for the duration of the call. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR) from G1, G2 shall start its originating auto-mode probing state, waiting for T2 to generate an appropriate signal to respond to. If G2 supports T1's modulation, it shall use that modulation. + +For the case of EDT, discrimination between data modems and PTP devices is determined by the half-duplexity of the signal. For data modems, the signal will be full duplex (i.e., there will be energy in both directions). For PTP, this will be half duplex. If EDT was being used by T1, G1 will + +only initiate a switch to text relay mode if it did not see energy in the opposite direction when it detected the EDT character. + +#### II.3.14 Scenarios #18 and #20 + +T1 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = does not support T1's modulation + +G2 = don't care + +![Figure II.13 – Scenarios #18 and #20 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T2 initiates the call with an ANSam signal, followed by V.18 probing, and then Baudot. G2 responds to T2's Baudot with PT = VBD. G2 also sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to T1. G1 responds to T1's Baudot with PT = VBD. T1 then sends Baudot to G1. A note indicates that G2 does not respond to any probing sequences it supports during this probing. A legend at the bottom left identifies yellow boxes as 'Text relayed signals' and blue hatched boxes as 'VBD signals'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_FII.13 at the bottom right.](6707cae4df136f92a0c9f3a4676f91a6_img.jpg) + +Legend: + +- Text relayed signals (Yellow box) +- VBD signals (Blue hatched box) + +NOTE – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +V.151(06)\_FII.13 + +Figure II.13 – Scenarios #18 and #20 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T2 initiates the call with an ANSam signal, followed by V.18 probing, and then Baudot. G2 responds to T2's Baudot with PT = VBD. G2 also sends SSE(VBD:ANSam) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to T1. G1 responds to T1's Baudot with PT = VBD. T1 then sends Baudot to G1. A note indicates that G2 does not respond to any probing sequences it supports during this probing. A legend at the bottom left identifies yellow boxes as 'Text relayed signals' and blue hatched boxes as 'VBD signals'. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_FII.13 at the bottom right. + +**Figure II.13 – Scenarios #18 and #20 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2 will generate a V.8 ANSam signal at the start of the call. Upon detection of the ANSam, G2 will initiate a transition to VBD mode through generation of a SSE(VBD:ANSam). The V.18 probing is allowed to be performed end to end through the VBD channel. G2 will not respond to any probing signals even in cases where it supports the modulation in the probing signals. + +Since G1 does not support the modulation used by T1, it will not detect a valid PTP signal and no transition to text relay mode will be initiated. T1 will connect with T2 using VBD mode for the duration of the call. + +#### II.3.15 Scenarios #21 and #22 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.14 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of messages between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TP:p') to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:Baudot) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to G1. G1 sends Baudot to T1. G2 sends Baudot to T2. Notes: Note 1 points to the PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD message. Note 2 points to the CI/XCI signal from G2 to T2. Note 3 points to the Baudot signal from G1 to T1. Legend: Yellow box = Text relayed signals, Blue box = VBD signals.](99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – G1 will use modulation of T2 if it is available; otherwise, use first modulation on normal probing sequence. + +Figure II.14 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of messages between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. G1 sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TP:p') to G1. G1 sends SSE(TR:Baudot) to G2. G2 sends SSE(TR:p') to G1. G1 sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to G1. G1 sends Baudot to T1. G2 sends Baudot to T2. Notes: Note 1 points to the PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD message. Note 2 points to the CI/XCI signal from G2 to T2. Note 3 points to the Baudot signal from G1 to T1. Legend: Yellow box = Text relayed signals, Blue box = VBD signals. + +**Figure II.14 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2 indicating a new mode (either VBD or text relay). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TR:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state, searching for a signal that it detects as a valid PTP signal. Once a valid PTP signal is detected by G2, G2 will send an SSE(TR) to G1. After the SSE(TR:p') response is received from G1, G2 will start to transmit received characters using text relay. + +Upon receiving a SSE(TR) from G2, G1 will start a connect sequence with T1 (which it knows is a V.18 PTP device). G1 shall use the modulation being used by T2 if it is supported, or else will use the first modulation in the normal auto-mode probing sequence. G1 shall buffer the character received from G2 until it has established connection with T1. + +#### II.3.16 Scenarios #23 and #24 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = does not support modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.15 – Scenario #23 and #24 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to T1. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and SSE(TP:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(VBD:Baudot) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context.](38a51baf4d5b8857d162e5d9a0645269_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway, it is required to detect all varieties of V.18 modulations for the purposes of initiating transition to VBD mode. + +V.151(06)\_FII.15 + +Figure II.15 – Scenario #23 and #24 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends a CI/XCI signal to G1. G1 then sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to T1. G1 also sends SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and SSE(TP:p') to G2. G2 sends SSE(VBD:Baudot) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context. + +**Figure II.15 – Scenario #23 and #24 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. Since G1 is a V.151-compliant gateway that supports SSE protocol, it will detect CI/XCI indicating to G1 that it is connected to a V.18 PTP terminal. Upon detection of CI/XCI, G1 may continue to transmit the CI/XCI sequence using audio mode to G2, or it may optionally initiate a transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) to G2. The diagram does not show the optional VBD SSE negotiation at this point. After CI/XCI sequence is completely transmitted to G2 (either through audio or VBD encoding), G1 shall send an SSE(TP:CI/XCI) to G2 and terminate regeneration of signals to T1. G1 shall stay in the mode of silence generation to T1 until it receives an SSE response from G2 indicating a new mode (either VBD or text relay). + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:CI/XCI) from G1, G2 will enter an answering auto-mode probing state, searching for a signal that it detects as a valid PTP signal. When G2 detects a signal that is not a PTP modulation that it supports for modem relay, G2 will transmit to G1 an SSE(VBD). G1 will respond with an SSE(VBD:p') completing the transition to VBD mode. The connection will stay in VBD mode for the duration of the session. + +#### II.3.17 Scenario #25 + +T1 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports T1's modulation + +G2 = supports T2's modulation + +![Figure II.16 – Scenario #25 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The sequence of events is as follows: 1. T2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G2. 2. G2 sends 'SSE(TP:Baudot)' to G1 (Note 1). 3. G1 sends 'Baudot probing' to T1. 4. T1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G1. 5. G1 sends 'SSE(TR:Baudot)' to G2 (Note 3). 6. G2 buffers the characters and sends 'SSE(TR:p\')' to G1 (Note 2). 7. G1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T1. 8. G1 sends 'PT = TR(CHAR)' to G2. 9. G2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T2. 10. T2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G2. 11. G2 sends 'PT = TR(CHAR)' to G1 (Note 4). 12. G1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T1. The diagram uses yellow boxes for text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes for VBD signals. A legend at the bottom left defines these symbols. Notes 1-4 provide additional context for the sequence.](aa6e28822419dba9f22129fee66c9c4c_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – Probing sequence start with Baudot modulation if available (since SSE indicated Baudot being used by T2). + +NOTE 2 – Received characters are buffered by G2 until mode transition to TR is complete. + +NOTE 3 – Received characters are buffered by G1 until mode transition to TR is complete. + +NOTE 4 – Since Baudot is half duplex, G1 shall wait for loss of carrier from T1 before transmitting received characters from G2. + +V.151(06)\_FII.16 + +Figure II.16 – Scenario #25 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The sequence of events is as follows: 1. T2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G2. 2. G2 sends 'SSE(TP:Baudot)' to G1 (Note 1). 3. G1 sends 'Baudot probing' to T1. 4. T1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G1. 5. G1 sends 'SSE(TR:Baudot)' to G2 (Note 3). 6. G2 buffers the characters and sends 'SSE(TR:p\')' to G1 (Note 2). 7. G1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T1. 8. G1 sends 'PT = TR(CHAR)' to G2. 9. G2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T2. 10. T2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G2. 11. G2 sends 'PT = TR(CHAR)' to G1 (Note 4). 12. G1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T1. The diagram uses yellow boxes for text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes for VBD signals. A legend at the bottom left defines these symbols. Notes 1-4 provide additional context for the sequence. + +**Figure II.16 – Scenario #25 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2, being the called PTP terminal, will, according to PTP etiquette, initiate the first text transmission. Since G2 supports the HDX modulation used by T2, it will detect the modulation per V.151 requirements and send an SSE(TP:Baudot) to G1 indicating this G2 shall not respond to T1 until transition to text relay mode is complete and it receives characters from G1. G2 may send the received characters to G1 after receiving the SSE(TP:p\') from G1. These characters may be used by G1 when generating probing sequences. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:Baudot) from G2, G1 shall enter originating auto-mode probing state. If G1 supports Baudot, it shall start the probing sequence with Baudot. Upon receiving a valid response from T1, G1 shall send an SSE(TR:Baudot) response back to G2. G2 will then immediately respond with an SSE(TR:p\') completing the transition to text relay mode. + +Once in text relay mode, G1 and G2 will send their received characters via RTP. Note that since Baudot (and all other NCC modulations) are half duplex, the gateways might have to buffer characters received from the IP network until their local terminals have stopped transmitting. + +**II.3.18 Scenario #26** + +T1 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + T2 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + G1 = does not support T1's modulation + G2 = supports T2's modulation + +![Figure II.17 – Scenario #26 call flow diagram (SSE)](4801e73fa692059f2ca78196e6e907be_img.jpg) + +``` + + sequenceDiagram + participant T1 + participant G1 + participant G2 + participant T2 + Note over G2, T2: Note 1 + T2->>G2: Baudot Char's + G2-->>G1: SSE(TP:Baudot) + rect rgb(255, 255, 0) + Note right of G1: Auto-mode probing + end + G1-->>G2: SSE(TP:p') + Note over G1, G2: Note 2 + G1-->>G2: SSE(VBD:TO) + G2-->>G1: SSE(VBD:p') + T2->>G1: PT = VBD + rect rgb(173, 216, 230) + Note right of G1: Baudot Char's + end + G1->>T1: Baudot Char's + T1->>G2: PT = VBD + rect rgb(173, 216, 230) + Note right of G2: Baudot Char's + end + G2->>T2: Baudot Char's + +``` + +- Text relayed signals +- VBD signals + +NOTE 1 – Received characters are buffered by G2 until mode transition to TR is complete. These characters will be discarded in this case since the channel does not complete transition to text relay. + NOTE 2 – G1 times out during auto-mode probing. + +**Figure II.17 – Scenario #26 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +Figure II.17 – Scenario #26 call flow diagram (SSE) + +**Description** + +T2, being the called PTP terminal, will, according to PTP etiquette, initiate the first text transmission. Since G2 supports the HDX modulation used by T2, it will detect the modulation per V.151 requirements and send an SSE(TP:Baudot) to G1 indicating a request to transition to text relay mode. G2 shall buffer all received characters until a transition to text relay mode is complete. G2 shall not respond to T1 until transition to text relay mode is complete and it receives characters from G1. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP:Baudot) from G2, G1 shall enter originating auto-mode probing state. Since G1 does not support the T1 modulation in this scenario, G1 will eventually time out and send a SSE(VBD) to G2, transitioning the session to VBD mode. G2 will discard the buffered characters and complete the transition to VBD mode by responding to G1 with an SSE(VBD:p'). The channel shall remain in VBD mode for the duration of the session. + +68 ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006) + +#### II.3.19 Scenario #27 + +T1 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports T1's modulation + +G2 = does not support T2's modulation + +![Figure II.18 – Scenario #27 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G1. G1 sends 'Baudot probing' to T1. G2 sends 'SSE(VBD:Baudot)' to G1 and 'SSE(VBD:p\')' to G1. G1 sends 'PT = VBD' to G2. G2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T2. A 'Note' box points to the 'SSE(VBD:Baudot)' and 'SSE(VBD:p\')' messages. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent 'Text relayed signals' and blue hatched boxes represent 'VBD signals'. The diagram is labeled 'V.151(06)_FII.18'.](60a40901e77feeb97ab6cf9c6d9418c3_img.jpg) + +Legend: + +- Text relayed signals (Yellow box) +- VBD signals (Blue hatched box) + +NOTE – V.151-compliant gateways are required to detect PTP modulations for purposes of initiating transition to VBD mode. + +Figure II.18 – Scenario #27 call flow diagram (SSE). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G1. G1 sends 'Baudot probing' to T1. G2 sends 'SSE(VBD:Baudot)' to G1 and 'SSE(VBD:p\')' to G1. G1 sends 'PT = VBD' to G2. G2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T2. A 'Note' box points to the 'SSE(VBD:Baudot)' and 'SSE(VBD:p\')' messages. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent 'Text relayed signals' and blue hatched boxes represent 'VBD signals'. The diagram is labeled 'V.151(06)\_FII.18'. + +**Figure II.18 – Scenario #27 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +T2, being the called PTP terminal, will, according to PTP etiquette, initiate the first text transmission. G2 will detect the Baudot signal and initiate a transition to VBD mode since it is not a modulation that it supports for text relay. The session will remain in VBD mode. + +If the connection did not follow PTP etiquette, and T1 transmitted first, G1 would initiate a transition to text relay mode through transmission of an SSE(TR) to G2. G2 would time out (or detect unsupported PTP signal) and respond with SSE(VBD) as per scenario #26. + +#### II.3.20 Scenario #28 + +T1 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = HDX protocol (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = does not support T1's modulation + +G2 = does not support T2's modulation + +**Description** + +In this scenario, neither gateway supports the modulation used by their local PTP devices. Since the gateways are V.151-compliant, they will detect a PTP signal that is not supported via text relay and will initiate a transition to VBD mode. The gateway receiving the SSE(VBD) will respond with SSE(VBD) and the transition to VBD will be completed. The gateways will stay in VBD mode for the duration of the call. + +**II.3.21 Scenario #29** + +T1 = FDX PTP device (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = HDX PTP device (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports T1's modulation + +G2 = supports T2's modulation + +![Figure II.19 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (SSE)](8ab30dbff406204a68c59ae7c1b77413_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a call flow between T1, G1, G2, and T2. + Sequence of events: + 1. T2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to G2. + 2. G2 sends SSE(TP:Baudot) to G1. Note 2 indicates received characters are buffered by G2 until mode transition to TR is complete. + 3. G1 starts 'Probing' towards T1. Note 1 indicates probing sequence starts with Baudot modulation if available. + 4. G1 sends SSE(TP:p') to G2. + 5. T1 responds to G1 with V.21 (low) signals. + 6. G1 transitions to V.21 (high) and sends SSE(TR:V.21 ch1) to G2. + 7. G1 also sends SSE(TR:p') to G2. + 8. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. + 9. G1 sends CHAR to T1 and PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. + 10. G2 sends 'Baudot Char's' to T2. + +Figure II.19 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (SSE) + +     Text relayed signals + +▒▒▒ VBD signals + +NOTE 1 – Probing sequence start with Baudot modulation if available (since SSE indicated Baudot being used by T2). + +NOTE 2 – Received characters are buffered by G2 until mode transition to TR is complete. + +**Figure II.19 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +**Description** + +As per PTP etiquette, T2 will initially transmit a character which will be detected by G2 as a valid PTP modulation supported for text relay. G2 will then generate an SSE(TP) to G1. G2 may send characters received to G1 so that G1 could use these in its probing signals. + +Upon reception of the SSE(TP) from G2, G1 will start an originating auto-mode probing sequence with T1. G1 should start the auto-mode probing sequence with T2's modulation if it is supported. Since G1 supports the FDX modulation in this scenario, it will eventually connect with T1, at which time it shall send an SSE(TR) to G2 indicating it has successfully connected with a PTP device in text relay mode. + +70 ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006) + +When G2 receives the SSE(TR) from G1, it will respond with SSE(TR:p') completing the transition to text relay mode and send any buffer characters to G1. + +#### II.3.22 Scenarios #30 to #32 + +In these scenarios, either or both of the gateways does not support the modulation of its local PTP device. Both PTP devices are not V.18 PTP devices, and one is FDX based while the other is HDX based. No successful connection will be achieved, although the channel may be transitioned to VBD mode since the gateway should detect either of the PTP signals. + +#### II.3.23 Scenario #33 + +T1 = HDX PTP device (Baudot in this example) + +T2 = FDX PTP device (V.21 in this example) + +G1 = supports T1's modulation + +G2 = supports T2's modulation + +![Figure II.20 – Scenario #33 call flow diagram (SSE).](17f0cf80b9c38adb460d4ca836960da7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a sequence of signals between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. +- T2 starts by sending an ANS signal to G2. +- G2 sends SSE(VBD:ANS) to G1 and SSE(VBD:p') back to G1. +- G1 sends ANS to T1. +- T2 then sends V.21 High signals. +- G2 sends SSE(TP:V.21 ch2) and SSE(TP:p') to G1. +- G1 performs Probing and then Baudot modulation with T1. +- T1 sends Baudot characters. +- G1 sends SSE(TR:Baudot) to G2. +- G2 responds with SSE(TR:p'). +- G1 sends PT = TR to G2. +- G2 sends V.21 Low and CHAR to T2. +- G1 sends Baudot to T1. +- Notes 1, 2, and 3 are referenced at specific points in the sequence. + +- Text relayed signals +- VBD signals + +NOTE 1 – Probing sequence starts with V.21 modulation if available (since SSE indicated V.21 being used by T2). + +NOTE 2 – Send SSE(TR:V.21) if G1 supports T2 and reason codes are used; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +NOTE 3 – Characters are buffered by G2 until transition to text relay mode complete. + +Figure II.20 – Scenario #33 call flow diagram (SSE). + +V.151(06)\_FII.20 + +**Figure II.20 – Scenario #33 call flow diagram (SSE)** + +##### Description + +Since T2 is an FDX answering PTP, it will initiate the call by either sending the optional ANS signal or carrier. Upon detection of the ANS signal, G2 will transition to VBD mode by sending an SSE(VBD). Upon detection of a PTP character, G2 will send an SSE(TP) to G1 to not respond to T2 (until it gets an SSE(TR) from T1). + +Upon receiving the SSE(TR) from G2, G1 will start an auto-mode probing sequence, starting with the modulation used by T2 if available. If G1 receives a response from T1 that indicates that T1 is a HDX PTP device that uses a modulation that is supported by G1, G1 will respond with a SSE(TR) + +indicating this to G2. If G1 gets a response from T1 for an FDX modulation that is not the same as that being used by T2, G1 will send an SSE(VBD) as per scenarios #13 and #14. + +When G2 receives the SSE(TR) response from G1, it will respond with SSE(TR:p') completing the transition to text relay mode. G2 will then start the connect sequence with T2. + +**II.3.24 Scenarios #34 to #36** + +In these scenarios, either or both of the gateways does not support the modulation of its local PTP device. Both PTP devices are not V.18 PTP devices, and one is FDX based while the other is HDX based. No successful connection will be achieved, although the channel may be transitioned to VBD mode since the gateway should detect either of the PTP signals. + +**II.4 Scenarios with payload type switching being used** +**II.4.1 Scenario #1** + +T1 = V.18 PTP +T2 = V.18 PTP +G1 = supports V.18 native mode +G2 = supports V.18 native mode + +![Figure II.21 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (Payload type)](bc6f20871b4f01c61470306c304fc9fe_img.jpg) + +Detailed description of Figure II.21: A call flow diagram showing the interaction between T1, G1, G2, and T2. The vertical axis represents time. Signals are exchanged between these entities. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 responds with ANSam to G2. G2 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends ANSam to T1. T1 sends CM to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CM to T2. T2 sends JM to G2. G2 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends JM to T1. T1 sends CJ to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CJ to T2. Then, V.21 signals are exchanged: T1 sends V.21(L) MARK and CHAR to G1. G1 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends V.21(H) CHAR and V.21(H) to T2. T2 sends V.21(H) CHAR and V.21(H) to G2. G2 sends PT = TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends V.21(H) MARK and CHAR to T1. Note 1 indicates VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. Note 2 indicates CI/XCI may be detected by T2; if not, there is up to 3 seconds delay before ANSam is generated. Legend: Yellow boxes represent Text relayed signals, hatched boxes represent VBD signals. + +| T1 | G1 | Network (G1 to G2) | G2 | T2 | +|----------------|--------------|-----------------------|--------------|-------------------| +| CI/XCI → | (Note 1) | PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD → | | → CI/XCI (Note 2) | +| | | ← PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD | ← CI/XCI | | +| ← ANSam | ANSam (VBD) | | | ANSam → | +| | | PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD ← | | | +| CM → | | PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD → | | | +| | | PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD ← | CM (VBD) | → CM | +| CJ → | JM (VBD) | PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD → | | JM ← | +| | | | CJ (VBD) | → CJ | +| V.21(L) MARK → | V.21(H) MARK | PT = TR(CHAR) → | | V.21(H) CHAR ← | +| CHAR → | CHAR | | V.21(L) MARK | V.21(H) ← | +| V.21(L) MARK → | V.21(H) MARK | PT = TR(CHAR) ← | CHAR | V.21(H) → | + +Figure II.21 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (Payload type) + +     Text relayed signals +     VBD signals + NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. + NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. If not detected, there will be up to 3 seconds of additional delay before ANSam is generated. + +**Figure II.21 – Scenario #1 call flow diagram (Payload type)** +**Description** + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. G1 may optionally detect CI/XCI and transmit it in VBD mode. Upon detection of ANSam by G2, if G1 has not already switched to VBD encoding based on CI/XCI detection, G2 will start VBD encoding. The V.8 handshake is allowed to proceed using VBD mode. G1 and G2 monitor the local CM or + +72 + +ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006) + +CJ sequences to determine that the endpoint devices are PTP devices. After completion of V.8 sequence between the two PTP devices using VBD mode, the gateways shall (within the 75-ms requirement) transition to text relay mode, locally generating the appropriate V.21 carrier and transmitting received characters via text relay encoding. + +#### II.4.2 Scenarios #2, #3 and #4 + +In these scenarios, both of the PTP devices are V.18 devices. As in scenario #1, the connection will enter VBD mode either through detection of the CI/XCI or through detection of ANSam. Since one or both of the gateways in these scenarios does not support V.18 native mode, the connection shall stay in VBD mode. The gateways shall monitor the CM/JM sequence, detecting the V.18 PTP devices but maintaining a VBD connection. + +#### II.4.3 Scenario #5 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +G2 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +![Figure II.22 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (Payload type). This sequence diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and G1 are on the left, G2 and T2 are on the right. T1 and G1 have vertical timelines. T1's timeline shows a '1270 Hz SPACE' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. G1's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '2225 Hz MARK' block. G2's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '1270 Hz SPACE' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. T2's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '2225 Hz MARK' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. Red arrows indicate signal types: 'PT = VBD' from G2 to G1, 'PT = TR(NULL)' from G1 to G2, 'PT = TR(CHAR)' from G1 to G2, and 'PT = TR(CHAR)' from G2 to G1. A 'Note' box points to the 'V.18 Probing' blocks. A legend at the bottom left shows a yellow box for 'Text relayed signals' and a hatched box for 'VBD signals'. The text 'V.151(06)_FII.22' is at the bottom right.](d04f4b76a3f7aa0ff51714fb1f71d9d3_img.jpg) + +Legend: + +- Text relayed signals (Yellow) +- VBD signals (Hatched) + +NOTE – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +V.151(06)\_FII.22 + +Figure II.22 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (Payload type). This sequence diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and G1 are on the left, G2 and T2 are on the right. T1 and G1 have vertical timelines. T1's timeline shows a '1270 Hz SPACE' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. G1's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '2225 Hz MARK' block. G2's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '1270 Hz SPACE' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. T2's timeline shows a hatched 'ANSam' block, a hatched 'V.18 Probing' block, and a yellow '2225 Hz MARK' block followed by a 'CHAR' block. Red arrows indicate signal types: 'PT = VBD' from G2 to G1, 'PT = TR(NULL)' from G1 to G2, 'PT = TR(CHAR)' from G1 to G2, and 'PT = TR(CHAR)' from G2 to G1. A 'Note' box points to the 'V.18 Probing' blocks. A legend at the bottom left shows a yellow box for 'Text relayed signals' and a hatched box for 'VBD signals'. The text 'V.151(06)\_FII.22' is at the bottom right. + +**Figure II.22 – Scenario #5 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +##### Description + +Since T2 is a V.18 answering PTP, it will generate ANSam after 3 seconds (because CI/XCI was not received). Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway, it will detect ANSam and initiate a switch to VBD mode. T2 is allowed to probe T1 using VBD mode. G2 does not respond to any of the T2 probing sequences, even those that represent modulations that G2 supports since it has not been established that an end-to-end text relay connection can be successfully made between all gateways and PTP devices. Upon detection by G1 of a PTP FDX modulation probing response from T1 that it + +supports, G1 will initiate a switch to text relay. In the case where T1 and T2 are not PTP, but data modems, we should require that both PSTN legs of the call be of the same modulation type so as to result in successful connection for data modems as well as PTP devices using proper character treatments. There are no mechanisms in payload type switching for ensuring this. + +#### II.4.4 Scenario #6 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = does not support modulation used by T1 + +G2 = don't care + +![Figure II.23 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a call flow between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and G1 are on the left, G2 and T2 are on the right. T1 sends V.21(H) MARK and CHAR signals. G1 sends ANSam and V.18 probing signals. G2 sends PT = VBD signals. T2 sends ANSam, V.18 probing, V.21(L) MARK, CHAR, and V.21(L) MARK signals. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. A note indicates that G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing.](efb282bed9f06eef1987a14fb27bc599_img.jpg) + +Legend: + +- Text relayed signals (Yellow box) +- VBD signals (Blue hatched box) + +NOTE – Allow end-to-end V.18 probing until T1 responds. G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +Figure II.23 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a call flow between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and G1 are on the left, G2 and T2 are on the right. T1 sends V.21(H) MARK and CHAR signals. G1 sends ANSam and V.18 probing signals. G2 sends PT = VBD signals. T2 sends ANSam, V.18 probing, V.21(L) MARK, CHAR, and V.21(L) MARK signals. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. A note indicates that G2 does not respond to any probing sequences that it supports during this probing. + +Figure II.23 – Scenario #6 call flow diagram (Payload type) + +##### Description + +Since T2 is a V.18 answering PTP, it will generate ANSam after 3 seconds (because CI/XCI was not received). Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway, it will detect ANSam and initiate a switch to VBD mode. T2 is allowed to probe T1 using VBD mode. G2 does not respond to any of the T2 probing sequences, even those that represent modulations that G2 supports since it has not been established that an end-to-end text relay connection can be successfully made between all gateways and PTP devices. Since the modulation that is responded to by T1 is not supported by G1, G1 does not initiate a switch to text relay mode and the connection remains in VBD mode for the entire call. + +#### **II.4.5 Scenario #7** + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) + +G2 = supports FDX modulation (Bell 103 in this example) (Does not support native V.18) + +##### **Description** + +This scenario plays out identical to scenario #5. The only difference between these scenarios is that G2 does not support native V.18 mode, but the call flow is identical. + +#### **II.4.6 Scenario #8** + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = V.18 PTP + +G1 = does not support modulation used by T1 + +G2 = does not support native V.18 mode + +##### **Description** + +This scenario plays out identical to scenario #5. The only difference between these scenarios is that G2 does not support native V.18 mode, but the call flow is identical. + +#### **II.4.7 Scenarios #9 and #10** + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 (V.21 in this example) + +![Figure II.24 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (Payload type). This sequence diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT=AUDIO/PT=VBD to G2 (Note 1). G2 sends CI/XCI to T2 (Note 2). G2 sends PT=VBD to G1 (Note 3). G1 sends PT=VBD to G2. G1 sends PT=TR(NULL) to G2 (Note 4). G1 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G2. The diagram also shows V.21(H) MARK, V.21(L) MARK, and CHAR signals. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)_FII.24.](24ba47df8be44ae91945d88ce2232df5_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – ANS tone is optional. + +NOTE 4 – Transition to text relay mode only if both G1 and G2 support the modulation used by T1 and T2. + +Figure II.24 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (Payload type). This sequence diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT=AUDIO/PT=VBD to G2 (Note 1). G2 sends CI/XCI to T2 (Note 2). G2 sends PT=VBD to G1 (Note 3). G1 sends PT=VBD to G2. G1 sends PT=TR(NULL) to G2 (Note 4). G1 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G2. G2 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G1. G1 sends PT=TR(CHAR) to G2. The diagram also shows V.21(H) MARK, V.21(L) MARK, and CHAR signals. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. The diagram is labeled V.151(06)\_FII.24. + +**Figure II.24 – Scenarios #9 and #10 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +##### Description + +Since T1 is the V.18 calling PTP, it will generate a CI/XCI sequence. G1 may optionally detect CI/XCI and transmit it in VBD mode. Upon detection of ANS by G2, if G1 has not already switched to VBD encoding based on CI/XCI detection, G2 will start VBD encoding. Text relay mode is entered by G1 detecting a valid PTP modulation from T1 in response to signals generated by T2. G1 only switches to text relay encoding if both G1 and G2 support the modulation that is being used by T1 and T2. There is no protocol conversion supported in this scenario, since it is not known at the time of switchover to text relay if the terminal devices are PTP or data modem devices. By guaranteeing that both PSTN call legs are the same modulation, data modems can transparently be supported. + +In the case where ANS was not generated, G2 will detect the carrier signal from T2 and initiate switch to VBD mode. Note that for V.21, initial FDX answering signals are distinct from signals used by EDT modems. This is important because the call flow from non-FDX answer devices is quite different. + +#### II.4.8 Scenarios #11 and #12 + +In these scenarios, G2 does not support the modulation used by T1. As in scenarios #9 and #10, the connection will enter VBD mode either through the detection of CI/XCI by G1 or ANS by G2. Since G2 does not support the modulation used by T2, G1 will not transition the connection to text relay encoding even if it detects the PTP modulation used. The connection will stay in VBD mode. + +#### II.4.9 Scenarios #13 and #14 + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (V.21 in this example) + +T2 = FDX modulation PTP (same as T1) + +G1 = supports modulation of T1 + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.25 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The diagram illustrates the flow of signals and the state transitions between VBD (Voice Band Data) and TR (Text Relay) modes. T2 initiates the call with an ANS signal. G2 detects this and transitions to VBD mode. G2 then sends a PT=VBD signal to G1. G1 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T1. T1 sends a V.21(H) MARK signal to G1. G1 then sends a PT=VBD signal to G2. G2 sends a PT=TR(NULL) signal to G1. G1 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T1. T1 sends a CHAR signal to G1. G1 then sends a PT=TR signal to G2. G2 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T2. T2 sends a CHAR signal to G2. The diagram also shows a V.21(H) MARK signal from T1 to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context on the generation of ANS signals and the use of text relay encoding.](967e98a12645f89cb4a7620f42bf8c2e_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – Generation of ANS signal by T2 is optional. + +NOTE 2 – If ANS was not generated by T2, G2 shall initiate transition to VBD upon V.21 mark detection. + +NOTE 3 – Only use text relay encoding if G2 supports modulation of T1; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +Figure II.25 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows the interaction between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are terminals, while G1 and G2 are gateways. The diagram illustrates the flow of signals and the state transitions between VBD (Voice Band Data) and TR (Text Relay) modes. T2 initiates the call with an ANS signal. G2 detects this and transitions to VBD mode. G2 then sends a PT=VBD signal to G1. G1 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T1. T1 sends a V.21(H) MARK signal to G1. G1 then sends a PT=VBD signal to G2. G2 sends a PT=TR(NULL) signal to G1. G1 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T1. T1 sends a CHAR signal to G1. G1 then sends a PT=TR signal to G2. G2 sends a V.21(L) MARK signal to T2. T2 sends a CHAR signal to G2. The diagram also shows a V.21(H) MARK signal from T1 to G1. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context on the generation of ANS signals and the use of text relay encoding. + +**Figure II.25 – Scenarios #13 and #14 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +##### Description + +T2 being the answering PTP device will initiate the generation of a FDX signal, optionally preceded by the ANS signal. Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway, upon detection of the ANS tone, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD mode. When G2 detects the carrier for a FDX modulation that it supports for text, it shall initiate a transition to text relay mode through the generation of a packet containing the NULL character encoded using TR payload type if G1 has also indicated support for this modulation. If G1 does not support the modulation used by T2, the connection will remain in VBD for the duration of the call. + +Upon reception of TR payload type from G2, G1 shall enter an originate mode auto-probing sequence. Since T1 is the same modulation as T2, G1 will connect with T1 using this modulation. Upon detection of the response signal from T1, G1 will encode the received characters using text relay payload type. + +T1 = FDX modulation PTP (Bell 103 in this example) + T2 = FDX modulation PTP (same as T1) + G1 = supports modulation of T1 + G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.25-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (Payload type) Legend: Yellow box for Text relayed signals, Blue hatched box for VBD signals.](ff0299b306c850173d9aac7783bf1780_img.jpg) + +``` + +sequenceDiagram + participant T1 + participant G1 + participant G2 + participant T2 + + Note over T2: 2225 Hz + T2->>G2: 2225 Hz + G2->>G1: PT = VBD + Note over G1: 2225 Hz (VBD signal) + G1->>T1: 2225 Hz + + Note over T1: CHAN 1 MARK + T1->>G1: CHAN 1 MARK + Note over G1: (Text relayed signal) + G1->>G2: PT = TR(NULL) + Note over G2: CHAN 1 MARK + G2->>T2: CHAN 1 MARK + + Note over T1: CHAR + T1->>G1: CHAR + G1->>G2: PT = VBD + G2->>G1: PT = TR + Note over G1: CHAN 2 MARK + G1->>T1: CHAN 2 MARK + + Note over T2: CHAN 2 MARK + T2->>G2: CHAN 2 MARK + Note over G2: CHAR + G2->>G1: PT = TR + Note over G1: CHAR + G1->>T1: CHAR + + Note over T2: CHAR + T2->>G2: CHAR + Note over G2: CHAN 1 MARK + G2->>T1: CHAN 1 MARK + + Note over T2: CHAN 2 MARK + T2->>G2: CHAN 2 MARK + +``` + +NOTE – Only use text relay encoding if G2 supports modulation of T1; otherwise, stay in VBD mode. + +Figure II.25-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (Payload type) Legend: Yellow box for Text relayed signals, Blue hatched box for VBD signals. + +**Figure II.25-1 – Scenarios #13 and #14 (Bell 103) call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +### Description + +Bell 103 is a special case of the FDX to FDX scenario since, unlike other FDX modems such as V.21, the originating modem is first to generate carrier upon detection of the 2225-Hz answer tone. + +T2 being the answering Bell 103 PTP device will initiate the generation of 2225-Hz answer tone. Since G2 is a V.151-compliant gateway, upon detection of the 2225-Hz tone, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD mode. When G1 detects MARK for a Bell 103 originating modem that it supports for text, it shall initiate a transition to text relay mode through the generation of a packet containing the NULL character encoded using TR payload type if G2 has also indicated support for this modulation. If G2 does not support the modulation used by T2, the connection will remain in VBD mode for the duration of the call. + +Upon reception of the TR payload type, G2 will start connect sequence with T2. + +In this scenario, T1 and T2 modulations must be the same for the PTP connection to be established. There is no support for protocol conversion in this scenario. Ensuring that T1 and T2 modulations are the same allows non-PTP data modems that use the same physical layer modulation to also be supported using relay. + +#### II.4.10 Scenarios #15 and #16 + +In these scenarios, G2 does not support the modulation used by T2. As in scenario #13, the connection will enter VBD mode by the detection of ANS or constant carrier by either gateway. + +78 ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006) + +T1 will not initiate a transition to text relay encoding since G2 does not support the detected modulation. + +#### II.4.11 Scenarios #17, #18, #19 and #20 + +These scenarios are identical to the call flow described in the SSE case, with the exception of using payload type switching instead of SSE protocol. + +#### II.4.12 Scenarios #21 and #22 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = supports any modulation + +G2 = supports modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.26 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI signals to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2 (Note 1). G2 sends CI/XCI to T2 (Note 2). T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to G1 (Note 3). G1 sends Baudot to T1. T1 sends Baudot to G1. G1 sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends Baudot to T2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context for the signals.](4224f170b677d60f6f86ce95d8dc725a_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – Only use text relay encoding if G1 supports the modulation being used by T2. + +V.151(06)\_FII.26 + +Figure II.26 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a sequence of events between four entities: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI signals to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2 (Note 1). G2 sends CI/XCI to T2 (Note 2). T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = TR to G1 (Note 3). G1 sends Baudot to T1. T1 sends Baudot to G1. G1 sends PT = TR to G2. G2 sends Baudot to T2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context for the signals. + +**Figure II.26 – Scenarios #21 and #22 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +##### Description + +In this scenario, G1 may switch to VBD encoding on the detection of CI/XCI. When the signal from T2 is detected by G2, G2 will start text relay encoding only if G1 also supports this modulation. In scenario #21, this will result in text relay being used for the session. + +#### II.4.13 Scenarios #23 and #24 + +T1 = V.18 PTP + +T2 = HDX modulation PTP (Baudot in this example) + +G1 = don't care + +G2 = does not support modulation of T2 + +![Figure II.27 – Scenarios #23 and #24 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a sequence of messages between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends Baudot to T1. T1 sends Baudot to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends Baudot to T2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context.](5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg) + +NOTE 1 – VBD may optionally be used for CI/XCI signal. If VBD is used, there is an SSE(VBD:CI/XCI) handshake here. + +NOTE 2 – CI/XCI may be detected by T2. + +NOTE 3 – G2 is required to be able to detect modulation for the purpose of transitioning to VBD encoding. + +V.151(06)\_FII.27 + +Figure II.27 – Scenarios #23 and #24 call flow diagram (Payload type). The diagram shows a sequence of messages between T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 sends CI/XCI to G1. G1 sends PT = AUDIO/PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends CI/XCI to T2. T2 sends Baudot to G2. G2 sends PT = VBD to G1. G1 sends Baudot to T1. T1 sends Baudot to G1. G1 sends PT = VBD to G2. G2 sends Baudot to T2. A legend indicates that yellow boxes represent text relayed signals and blue hatched boxes represent VBD signals. Notes 1, 2, and 3 provide additional context. + +**Figure II.27 – Scenarios #23 and #24 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +##### Description + +In this scenario, G1 may switch to VBD encoding on the detection of CI/XCI. If G1 did not switch to VBD on CI/XCI, G2 will initiate a switch to VBD encoding upon detection of a PTP signal that it does not support in text relay mode. The session will stay in VBD mode. Note G1 will not initiate a transition to text relay mode upon detection of the PTP signal from T1 since it knows that G2 does not support this modulation. + +#### II.4.14 Scenarios #25 and #26 + +The call flow for these scenarios is the same as scenarios #21 and #22. The difference in the scenarios is that T1 is a V.18 modem, but this does not affect the operation of the gateways. If T1 and T2 are not the same modulation, the connection will fail since there is no support for conversion in these scenarios. + +#### II.4.15 Scenario #27 + +The connection stays in VBD for this scenario. Since G2 does not support text relay for the HDX modulation used by T2, it will transition to VBD mode upon detection of the signal. G1 does support the modulation used by T1, but it will not transition to text relay mode since G2 does not support this modulation. If G1 detects the first signal, it will instead transition to VBD mode. If T1 and T2 use different HDX modulations, the connection will fail since there is no support for conversion in this scenario. + +#### II.4.16 Scenario #28 + +Neither gateway supports text relay for the modulations used by T1 and T2. The gateways will transition to VBD encoding upon detection of the signal from their local PTP devices and the connection will remain in VBD mode. + +### II.4.17 Scenario #29 + +T1 = FDX PTP device (V.21 in this example) + T2 = HDX PTP device (Baudot in this example) + G1 = supports T1's modulation + G2 = supports T2's modulation + +![Figure II.28 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (Payload type)](4619c14be962e4c3ba6613aad97f7a86_img.jpg) + +``` + + sequenceDiagram + participant T1 + participant G1 + participant G2 + participant T2 + Note over G1: Probing + G2->>G1: PT = TR(CHAR) (Red arrow) + T2->>G2: Baudot Char's + Note right of G2: Note + T1->>G1: V.21 (low) + G1->>T1: V.21 (high) + G2->>G1: PT = TR(CHAR) (Red arrow) + G1->>T1: CHAR + G1->>G2: PT = TR(CHAR) (Red arrow) + Note over G2: Baudot Char's + G2->>T2: (Signal arrow) + +``` + +Legend: + [Yellow Box] Text relayed signals + [Hatched Box] VBD signals + NOTE – Text relay is only used if T2 is included in the modulations supported by G1. Use VBD if T2 is not included in G1's modulations. + +**Figure II.28 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (Payload type)** + +Figure II.28 – Scenario #29 call flow diagram (Payload type) + +#### Description + +Strange restriction since not using SSEs: If T1 is supported by G1, T1 is not T2, and G1 does not support T2, then this will not connect (since G2 will try to go to VBD). It will work if SSEs are used. Restriction since we are leaning towards T1=T2 and want to go to VBD for that mode (no signalling mechanisms available to put us back into VBD). + +Upon detection of the non-constant carrier signal from T2, G2 will start text relay encoding if G1 supports this modulation, otherwise G2 will initiate switch to VBD. Upon receiving text relay encoded packet, G1 will start its auto-mode probing sequence with T1. + +### II.4.18 Scenario #30 + +T1 = FDX PTP device (V.21 in this example) + T2 = HDX PTP device (Baudot in this example) + G1 = does not support T1's modulation + G2 = supports T2's modulation + +**ITU-T Rec. V.151 (05/2006)**      81 + +##### **Description** + +In this scenario, G1 does not have a modulation that is used by T1. G2, after detecting the PTP modulation from T2 that it supports and that G1 supports, will start sending text relay packets to G1. G1 will start its auto-mode probing sequence, but will eventually time out since there is no common modulation between T1 and G1. The connection will fail as it would if there was no IP network involved since T1 and T2 are not compatible devices. + +#### **II.4.19 Scenarios #31 and 32** + +In these scenarios, either or both of the gateways does not support the modulation of its local PTP device. Both PTP devices are not V.18 PTP devices, and one is FDX based while the other is HDX based. No successful connection will be achieved, although the channel may be transitioned to VBD mode since the gateway should detect either of the PTP signals. + +#### **II.4.20 Scenarios #33 and #36** + +##### **Description** + +Will not connect. G2 will go into VBD mode on ANS, but never get to a character. If G1 does send a character (originator initiates text), then G1 will send PT=TR, then G2 will do FDX handshake. Implies that G2 is monitoring incoming signals, even though it has not yet sent PT=TR. + +# **Appendix III** + +## **The use of [IETF RFC 2198] in [ITU-T V.151]** + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +Redundancy is implemented using [IETF RFC 2198]. Annex E provides further clarification of how RFC 2198 redundancy can be used for the ToIP application. If using redundancy to improve performance over lossy networks, gateways should implement redundancy as described in these RFCs. The exception is that the buffer time for sending packets with redundant block and no primary blocks at the end of a text spurt should be 300 ms. + +# **Appendix IV** + +## **Text buffering and transmission** + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +When using the procedures in this Recommendation, text transmission may be negotiated with different speeds for different endpoints. There may also be cases when one leg of the call has successfully negotiated and connected and starts to handle text, while the other has not completed text negotiation. + +Both these situations require a buffer for text to be maintained in the gateways. There is no flow control available for PSTN text telephony, so human habits will be the limiting factor for the gateway buffer. + +The transport methods have an out-of-band signalling parameter for character rate that can control where the buffer needs to be located. + +A general rule is that a user will not create continuous output for more than one minute before expecting a response or making a pause. However, if input is by means of voice-to-text technologies at the maximum character rate of 30 characters per second, that means there is an input of 1800 characters. If the output is to the slowest possible text telephone, the US Baudot method, performing 6 characters per second, the buffer will build up $1800 - 360 = 1440$ characters. + +This calculation leads to a general indication that a gateway buffer of 2 kbytes should be sufficient. + +Once connected through a gateway, characters shall be transmitted between terminals involved in the call using negotiated protocols and buffering strategies. + +# Appendix V + +## Probing sequence + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +Appendix I of [ITU-T V.18] provides useful information on the ordering of automode probing sequences. These orderings are based upon the transmitting PTP supporting all of the V.18 modulations and with the *a priori* knowledge that the PTP is trying to call another PTP. These assumptions are not necessarily the case for media gateways. Once being given some indication that the gateway is to establish a connection for the purposes of connecting two PTPs, a gateway has to discover whether the endpoint on its PSTN connection is a PTP by the generation of probing sequences. It is the response to these probes that assist in the discrimination. A gateway does not have the geographical advantage either, since a gateway may be physically located in a different country or area than the PTP to which it is connected. Consequently, depending upon circumstances, it is possible that either one or two complete automode probing cycles may occur before being able to discriminate a PTP type. The amount of time to perform this discovery if a full V.18 implementation is used may take longer than one minute. This is not desirable from a user satisfaction perspective, and could lead to larger instances of call failure for the IP network than that of the legacy PSTN. If connect times at the remote gateway/PTP connection take a significant amount of time, the calling side user may start typing instead of waiting for the answering user to start typing, possibly causing the calling PTP device to start carrier before receiving any answering signals. + +An alternative approach that can be utilized by gateways is to use an adaptive automode probing sequence ordering. This approach can be used by gateways to order their automode probing sequences based upon what modulations they support and what information they are provided by a peer gateway. This information could be provided by the optional use of SSEs. + +For typical usage scenarios, the majority of PTP connections will be between like PTP devices. That is expected because the call will be established between two endpoints that have already been connected on previous occasions or the number of the PTP being called is a known PTP endpoint. Examples of known PTP endpoints include government services, relay services, and published numbers. This type of information can be used to determine the best ordering of the automode sequence. + +There are a variety of methods and criteria that can be used when defining and using the automode probing sequences. These guidelines recommend that such criteria be determined by typical usage and application of PTP than an inflexible fixed sequence order. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ANSI/TIA-825] ANSI/TIA-825-A-2003, *A Frequency Shift Keyed Modem for Use on the Public Switched Telephone Network.* +- [b-ETSI ETR 333] ETSI ETR 333 (1998-05), *Human Factors (HF); Text Telephony; Basic user requirements and recommendations.* +- [b-IETF RFC 791] IETF RFC 791 (1981), *Internet Protocol.* +- [b-IETF RFC 919] IETF RFC 919 (1984), *Broadcasting Internet Datagrams.* +- [b-IETF RFC 920] IETF RFC 920 (1984), *Domain Requirements.* +- [b-IETF RFC 950] IETF RFC 950 (1985), *Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure.* +- [b-IETF RFC 4103] IETF RFC 4103 (2005), *RTP Payload for Text Conversation.* +- [b-TIA 1001] TIA 1001 (2004), *Transport of TIA-825-A Signals over IP Networks.* + + + +# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.152-201009-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.152-201009-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb2f41a22dc5b0b1fe2031b5f2632a56edb70000 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.152-201009-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1436 @@ + + +I n t e r n a t i o n a l   T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n   U n i o n + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.152 + +(09/2010) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interworking with other networks + +# --- **Procedures for supporting voice-band data over IP networks** + +Recommendation ITU-T V.152 + +![ITU logo: a globe with red lightning bolts and the text 'ITU International Telecommunication Union'](84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with two red lightning bolts striking it. To the right of the globe, the text "ITU" is written in a large, bold, blue font, and below it, the words "International Telecommunication Union" are written in a smaller, blue font. + +ITU logo: a globe with red lightning bolts and the text 'ITU International Telecommunication Union' + +## ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# Recommendation ITU-T V.152 + +# Procedures for supporting voice-band data over IP networks + +## Summary + +Voice-band data traffic has traditionally been transported by circuit switched systems and equipment. With the advent of the networks optimized for the transport of Internet Protocol (IP), and as a result of its considerable growth and pervasive nature, more and more voice-band data traffic is expected to be carried over IP networks. + +Given that voice and voice-band data services remain a significant part of telecommunications, there is a need to ensure a high quality of service for voice and voice-band data carried in part, or wholly, via IP. Recommendation ITU-T V.152 defines procedures for equipment that interconnect GSTN networks with IP networks to provide satisfactory, transparent delivery of modulated voice-band data (VBD) as encoded audio content over IP (data modems, facsimile terminals and text telephones). + +Annex B defines a method that uses data signal detection and silence insertion in voiceband data that adds a means of providing bandwidth savings during transmission. + +Annex C addresses a problem discovered during the implementation of ITU-T V.152 gateways with the transmission of facsimile terminals. While this issue has been resolved by an amendment to Recommendation ITU-T T.30, due to the extremely large numbers of terminals deployed in the field and the low probability that they would be corrected retroactively, it was considered pre-emptive to include a solution in an ITU-T V.152 media gateway. + +This Recommendation is complementary to the modem relay and voice-band data Recommendations (Recommendations ITU-T V.150.0 and V.150.1). + +This revision includes the updating of references, general editing improvements for clarity and many additional examples of call control. It also integrates changes introduced by Corrigendum 1 (2005) for clarification to clauses 7.1 and 7.1.1; by Corrigendum 2 (2006) for clarifications on the use and control of echo cancellers and the application of IETF RFC 2833 with VBD; and by Amendment 1 (2009) for new Annexes B and C. + +## History + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | +|---------|-----------------------------|------------|-------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T V.152 | 2005-01-08 | 16 | +| 1.1 | ITU-T V.152 (2005) Cor. 1 | 2005-09-13 | 16 | +| 1.2 | ITU-T V.152 (2005) Cor. 2 | 2006-05-29 | 16 | +| 1.3 | ITU-T V.152 (2005) Amend. 1 | 2009-03-16 | 16 | +| 2.0 | ITU-T V.152 | 2010-09-13 | 16 | + +## Keywords + +Echo canceller, facsimile over IP, gateway, Internet gateway, Internet Protocol, IP gateway, media gateway, media gateway controller, modem over IP, quality of service, speech coding, TDM, TDM-IP gateway, text over IP, textphone over IP, text telephone, VBD, voice-band data, voice gateway, voice over IP, VoIP. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2011 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## Table of Contents + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 3 Definitions ..... | 3 | +| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere..... | 3 | +| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 3 | +| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 4 | +| 5 Conventions ..... | 5 | +| 5.1 Recommendation version ..... | 5 | +| 5.2 SDP Offer/Answer protocol variants..... | 5 | +| 6 Definition of the VBD mode of operation..... | 6 | +| 6.1 Minimum requirements for VBD mode of operation..... | 6 | +| 6.2 Echo canceller and VBD mode ..... | 6 | +| 6.3 IP transport services for VBD ..... | 7 | +| 7 Negotiation of support of VBD and selection of VBD codec and other VBD enhanced functionality..... | 7 | +| 7.1 Negotiation using the session description protocol..... | 8 | +| 7.2 Use of VBD in ITU-T H.323 systems ..... | 32 | +| 7.3 Mid-call negotiation using session description protocol..... | 34 | +| 8 The use of IETF RFC 4733 modem/facsimile/text telephone events..... | 35 | +| 9 VBD stimuli..... | 36 | +| 10 Procedures for transitioning between audio mode and VBD mode ..... | 36 | +| 10.1 Procedures for state transitioning ..... | 37 | +| 10.2 State machine – Overview ..... | 39 | +| 10.3 Enforced state transition by call/session control ..... | 39 | +| 11 Optional procedures for indicating to a remote end transition into VBD using state signalling events ..... | 39 | +| 11.1 Declaration of SSEs..... | 39 | +| 11.2 Transition to the VBD mode for ITU-T V.150.1 gateways ..... | 39 | +| 11.3 Transition to the VBD mode for non- ITU-T V.150 cases..... | 40 | +| 11.4 Transition from the VBD media mode..... | 41 | +| 11.5 Security – Optional..... | 43 | +| Annex A – Vendor-defined messages..... | 44 | +| Annex B – Use of data signal detection and silence insertion in voiceband data..... | 45 | +| B.1 Introduction ..... | 45 | +| B.2 Guideline for the use of DSD ..... | 45 | +| B.3 Negotiation of the DSD capability with SDP..... | 45 | +| B.4 Negotiation of the DSD capability with [ITU-T H.245] ..... | 46 | + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| Annex C – Use of ITU-T V.21 preamble for echo canceller control in an ITU-T V.152 gateway ..... | 47 | +| Bibliography..... | 49 | + +# Recommendation ITU-T V.152 + +# Procedures for supporting voice-band data over IP networks + +# 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the voice-band data (VBD) operation of Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) gateways and media gateways. The term "VBD" refers only to the use of suitable voice-band codecs for the transport of data payloads via RTP. The VBD procedures described in this Recommendation shall apply to VBD-only capable gateways. An ITU-T V.152 gateway only has the guarantee of interworking with another gateway if that gateway also supports ITU-T V.152. + +This does not preclude the interworking with non-ITU-T V.152 gateways; however, there are no guarantees of performance and supported functionality with such systems. The negotiation of a VBD capability does not exclude from a VoIP session any other capabilities such as the transport of audio signals, RFC 4733-based telephone events, ITU-T T.38 facsimile relay, RFC 4103 text relay and ITU-T V.150.1 modem relay, etc. + +Declaration of VBD support using the session description protocol (SDP) is detailed in clause 7.1. + +Declaration of VBD support using ITU-T H.245 is detailed in clause 7.2. + +This Recommendation supports hybrid modes of operation; for example, a device may support a VBD and facsimile relay capability but not a modem relay or text relay capability. In this example of hybrid operation modem and text payloads are transported in the VBD mode, while facsimile payloads could be transported in the ITU-T T.38 facsimile relay mode or in the VBD mode. The negotiation of such hybrid sets of capabilities follows SDP and ITU-T H.245 mechanisms (clause 11). + +This Recommendation describes the default mechanism for transitioning into VBD mode via payload-type switching as described in clause 10 and the optional mechanism of utilizing the state signalling events (SSE) messages described in clause 11. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T G.168] Recommendation ITU-T G.168 (2004), *Digital network echo cancellers*. +- [ITU-T G.701] Recommendation ITU-T G.701 (1993), *Vocabulary of digital transmission and multiplexing, and pulse code modulation (PCM) terms*. +- [ITU-T G.711] Recommendation ITU-T G.711 (1988), *Pulse code modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies*. +- [ITU-T G.726] Recommendation ITU-T G.726 (1990), *40, 32, 24, 16 kbit/s Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (ADPCM)*. +- [ITU-T G.728] Recommendation ITU-T G.728 (1992), *Coding of speech at 16 kbit/s using low-delay code excited linear prediction*. + +- [ITU-T G.729] Recommendation ITU-T G.729 (1996), *Coding of speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-structure algebraic-code-excited linear prediction (CS-ACELP)*. +- [ITU-T H.245] Recommendation ITU-T H.245 (2005), *Control protocol for multimedia communication*. +- [ITU-T H.248.1] Recommendation ITU-T H.248.1v3 (2005), *Gateway control protocol: Version 3*. +- [ITU-T H.248.2] Recommendation ITU-T H.248.2 (2005), *Gateway control protocol: Facsimile, text conversation and call discrimination packages*, plus Amendment 1 (2007), *Discriminated call type enhancement*. +- [ITU-T H.248.39] Recommendation ITU-T H.248.39 (2006), *Gateway control protocol: H.248 SDP parameter identification and wildcarding*. +- [ITU-T H.323] Recommendation ITU-T H.323 (2003), *Packet-based multimedia communications systems*. +- [ITU-T T.30] Recommendation ITU-T T.30 (2005), *Procedure for document facsimile transmission in the general switched telephone network*. +- [ITU-T T.35] Recommendation ITU-T T.35 (2000), *Procedure for the allocation of ITU-T defined codes for non-standard facilities*. +- [ITU-T T.38] Recommendation ITU-T T.38 (2004), *Procedures for real-time Group 3 facsimile communication over IP networks*. +- [ITU-T T.120] Recommendation ITU-T T.120 (1996), *Data protocols for multimedia conferencing*. +- [ITU-T V.8] Recommendation ITU-T V.8 (2000), *Procedures for starting sessions of data transmission over the public switched telephone network*. +- [ITU-T V.18] Recommendation ITU-T V.18 (2000), *Operational and interworking requirements for DCEs operating in the text telephone mode*. +- [ITU-T V.21] Recommendation ITU-T V.21 (1988), *300 bits per second duplex modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network*. +- [ITU-T V.34] Recommendation ITU-T V.34 (1998), *A modem operating at data signalling rates of up to 33 600 bit/s for use on the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point 2-wire telephone-type circuits*. +- [ITU-T V.150.1] Recommendation ITU-T V.150.1 (2003), *Modem-over-IP networks: Procedures for the end-to-end connection of V-series DCEs*. +- [IETF RFC 768] IETF RFC 768 (1980), *User Datagram Protocol*. +- [IETF RFC 791] IETF RFC 791 (1981), *Internet Protocol DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification*. +- [IETF RFC 2198] IETF RFC 2198 (1997), *RTP Payload for Redundant Audio Data*. +- [IETF RFC 3261] IETF RFC 3261 (2002), *SIP: Session Initiation Protocol*. +- [IETF RFC 3264] IETF RFC 3264 (2002), *An Offer/Answer Model with the Session Description Protocol (SDP)*. +- [IETF RFC 3388] IETF RFC 3388 (2002), *Grouping of Media Lines in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)*. +- [IETF RFC 3389] IETF RFC 3389 (2002), *Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) Payload for Comfort Noise (CN)*. + +- [IETF RFC 3550] IETF RFC 3550 (2003), *RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications*. +- [IETF RFC 4103] IETF RFC 4103 (2005), *RTP Payload for Text Conversation*. +- [IETF RFC 4566] IETF RFC 4566 (2006), *SDP: Session Description Protocol*. +- [IETF RFC 4733] IETF RFC 4733 (2006), *RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals*. +- [IETF RFC 4756] IETF RFC 4756 (2006), *Forward Error Correction Grouping Semantics in Session Description Protocol*. +- [IETF RFC 5109] IETF RFC 5109 (2007), *RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction*. + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +This Recommendation uses the terms defined in [ITU-T G.701]. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.2.1 audio mode:** In this mode, the channel processes speech signals. The mode may include the use of compression algorithms and other processing functions that are not suitable for the transport of modem or facsimile signals. + +**3.2.2 general switched telephone network (GSTN):** This network includes ATM, PSTN, ISDN, wireless networks and private networks. + +**3.2.3 ITU-T H.248 gateway:** A media gateway that complies with the ITU-T H.248x series of Recommendations. + +**3.2.4 media gateway (MG):** The media gateway converts media provided in one type of network to the format required in another type of network. For example, a MG could terminate bearer channels from a switched circuit network (e.g., DS0s) and media streams from a packet network (e.g., RTP streams in an IP network). This gateway may be capable of processing audio, video and ITU-T T.120 multimedia signals alone or in any combination, and will be capable of full duplex media translations. The MG may also play audio/video messages and performs other interactive voice response (IVR) functions, or may perform media conferencing. For the purpose of this Recommendation, the term media gateway refers to a voice gateway. + +**3.2.5 media gateway controller (MGC):** Controls the parts of the call state that pertain to connection control for media channels in a media gateway. + +**3.2.6 modem:** The term modem in this Recommendation covers all ITU-T V-series modems and text telephones types covered in the annexes of [ITU-T V.18]. + +**3.2.7 modem relay:** The transport of modem data across a packet network using modem termination at the gateways. + +**3.2.8 MoIP gateway:** A media gateway that is compliant with the ITU-T V.150x series of Recommendations. + +**3.2.9 off-ramp gateway:** The IP network access point that calls an answering DCE. (Abbreviated to G2.) + +**3.2.10 on-ramp gateway:** The access point that is called by an originating DCE that interfaces to the IP network. (Abbreviated to G1.) + +**3.2.11 transcoding:** Translation from one type of encoded media format to another different media format (examples: ITU-T G.711 A-law to $\mu$ -law or vice versa, ITU-T G.711 codec to ITU-T G.726-40K, ITU-T G.711 to a broadband codec that operates at 256 kbit/s, etc.). + +**3.2.12 VBD gateway:** A media gateway that is compliant with this Recommendation. + +**3.2.13 voice-band data mode:** The transport of voice-band data over a voice channel of a packet network with the encoding appropriate for modem signals as defined in clause 6 of this Recommendation. + +# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-------|---------------------------------------| +| ABNF | Augmented Backus-Naur Form | +| ACL | Answered Configuration (Codec) List | +| ANS | Answer Tone | +| /ANS | Answer tone with phase reversals | +| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One | +| ASNam | Answer Tone | +| CED | Facsimile CALLED tone | +| CI | Call Indicator Signal | +| CNG | Facsimile Calling tone | +| DS0 | Digital Signal, level 0 | +| DSD | Data Signal Detector | +| DTMF | Dual Tone Multi-Frequency | +| FAX | Facsimile | +| FEC | Forward Error Correction | +| FoIP | Facsimile over Internet Protocol | +| G3FE | Group 3 Facsimile Equipment | +| GSTN | General Switched Telephone Network | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| IVR | Interactive Voice Response | +| MG | Media Gateway | +| MGC | Media Gateway Controller | +| MoIP | Modem over Internet Protocol | +| MPS | Multiple Payload Stream | +| NCL | Negotiated Configuration (Codec) List | +| O/A | (SDP) Offer/Answer | +| OCL | Offered Configuration (Codec) List | +| OLC | Open Logical Channel | +| PCL | Preferred Configuration (Codec) List | + +| | | +|---------|---------------------------------------| +| PCMU | Pulse Code Modulation $\mu$ -law | +| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network | +| QoS | Quality of Service | +| RTCP | Real Time Control Protocol | +| RTP | Real Time Protocol | +| SCL | Supported Configuration (Codec) List | +| SCN | Switched Circuit Network | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SDP O/A | SDP Offer/Answer | +| SID | Silence Insertion Description | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | +| SPRT | Simple Packet Relay Transport | +| SS7 | Signalling System No. 7 | +| SSE | State Signalling Events | +| TDM | Time Division Multiplex(ing) | +| ToIP | Text telephony over Internet Protocol | +| UDP | User Datagram Protocol | +| VBD | Voice-band Data | +| VoIP | Voice over Internet Protocol | + +# 5 Conventions + +An ITU-T Recommendation, by definition, is not mandatory – compliance is voluntary. The use of the words "shall" and "must" and their negatives "shall not" and "must not" are to be used with care and sparingly. These words are only to be used to express mandatory provisions, when necessary, to give the Recommendation meaning and effect; i.e., if certain values and/or parts of a Recommendation are essential, and the Recommendation will have no meaning if these values and/or parts are not strictly respected or adhered to. Compliance with the Recommendation is achieved only when all mandatory provisions are met. However, the inclusion of mandatory provisions in a Recommendation does not imply, of itself, that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## 5.1 Recommendation version + +For the purposes of forward and backward compatibility, this Recommendation is assigned a version number, which is defined here. + +NOTE – The reader is encouraged to check on the ITU-T website for any normative or informative amendments to this Recommendation. + +Version: 1 + +## 5.2 SDP Offer/Answer protocol variants + +This Recommendation provides example signalling syntax. There are two models for the session description protocol (SDP) concerning the indication and negotiation of media and transport capabilities: + +- the name "legacy SDP Offer/Answer" indicates SDP Offer/Answer according to [IETF RFC 3264]; +- the name "revised SDP Offer/Answer" indicates SDP Offer/Answer according to [b-IETF RFC 5939] and [b-IETF Draft MediaCapNeg]. + +# **6 Definition of the VBD mode of operation** + +Voice-band data is the transport of modem, facsimile, and text telephony signals over a voice channel of a packet network with a codec appropriate for such signals. + +For voice-band data (VBD) mode of operation, all voice-band modulated signal samples shall be transported across an IP network using the RTP protocol defined in [IETF RFC 3550]. + +When in VBD mode, an ITU-T V.152 compliant implementation shall: + +- use a codec that passes voice-band modulated signals with minimal distortion. This codec shall be assigned as the VBD codec with a specific RTP payload type which shall be negotiated with the remote ITU-T V.152 implementations as described in clause 7; +- have end-to-end constant latency; +- disable voice activity detection and comfort noise generation during the data transfer phase; +- disable any DC removal filters that may be integral with the speech encoder used; + +and should consider the appropriate application of: + +- forward error correction (FEC) (e.g., [IETF RFC 5109]) or other forms of redundancy (e.g., [IETF RFC 2198]) only if support has been successfully negotiated with the remote ITU-T V.152 implementation; +- voice packet loss concealment techniques and algorithms that are suitable for modem and facsimile modulations. + +## **6.1 Minimum requirements for VBD mode of operation** + +For purposes of interoperability, an ITU-T V.152 compliant implementation shall support at least both ITU-T G.711 A-law and ITU-T G.711 $\mu$ -law codecs as VBD codecs. + +When negotiating the VBD codec, the initiating ITU-T V.152 implementation must include in the offer either PCMA or PCMU (or both) in the list of VBD codecs, though other VBD codecs may be additionally specified. The ITU-T V.152 implementation answering the offer must indicate support for at least one VBD codec, which need not be PCM-based. + +Redundancy as per [IETF RFC 2198] and forward error correction as per [IETF RFC 5109] are supported options. + +## **6.2 Echo canceller and VBD mode** + +Echo cancellation and VBD mode are independent functions in a VBD gateway. The requirement for echo cancellation is not a VBD characteristic, but depends on the propagation delay in combination with a source of echo present in the connection and refers primarily to voice. An ITU-T V.152 compliant implementation does, therefore, not need to provide echo cancellation. + +If an echo canceller (EC) is used on the VBD channel, then the EC shall be compliant to [ITU-T G.168]. The gateway autonomous control of the EC shall thus be orthogonal to the ITU-T V.152 audio-VBD state transitioning. + +[ITU-T G.168] implies the detection of inband events in both traffic directions, i.e., from circuit-switched and IP network side in case of a VBD gateway. + +## **6.3 IP transport services for VBD** + +### **6.3.1 Non-assured VBD mode** + +The non-assured VBD transport service is defined by the mandatory capabilities of ITU-T V.152, i.e., according to clause 6.1, + +- without RTP transport redundancy (according to [IETF RFC 2198]); and +- without forward error correction of RTP packets (according to [IETF RFC 5109]). + +The non-assured VBD mode should be sufficient in case of "good" IP network conditions. The non-assured VBD mode may be operated in two sub-modes with respect to the transfer of inband signals, see the following subclauses. + +#### **6.3.1.1 Non-assured transport of modem inband signals** + +This is a non-assured VBD transport service, + +- without RTP payload format for telephony events (according to [IETF RFC 4733]). + +#### **6.3.1.2 Assured transport of modem inband signals** + +[IETF RFC 4733] shall be used according to clause 8 (i.e., the IETF RFC 4733 NTE mode shall be used). Usage of IETF RFC 4733 packets implies a negotiation process with the peer PSTN gateway (see also clause 2.4.1 of [IETF RFC 4733]). + +### **6.3.2 Assured VBD mode** + +The assured VBD mode may be enabled in case of unreliable IP transport conditions. The assured VBD mode shall then use [IETF RFC 4733] for modem inband signals, and [IETF RFC 2198] and/or [IETF RFC 5109] for modem data information. Usage of [IETF RFC 2198] and [IETF RFC 5109] implies a negotiation process with the peer PSTN gateway: + +- IETF RFC 2198 SDP elements for negotiation: see clause 5 of [IETF RFC 2198]; +- IETF RFC 5109 SDP elements for negotiation: see [IETF RFC 4756]. + +# **7 Negotiation of support of VBD and selection of VBD codec and other VBD enhanced functionality** + +Negotiation of the support and use of VBD data mode, as defined in this Recommendation, shall be carried out at call establishment during the initial exchange of the call capabilities of the endpoints establishing the call, particularly under the following conditions: + +- if it is unclear whether the peer gateway is [ITU-T V.152] or non-[ITU-T V.152] compliant; +- if the same audio codec shall be used as ITU-T V.152 VBD codec, which implies the negotiation of a dynamic RTP PT value for the VBD codec; +- if it is already clear that a PSTN modem call may be expected (with a certain probability); and/or +- if ITU-T V.152 VBDoIP is preferred (by the IP service provider) above packet relay mechanisms (see also clause 7.1.2.1). + +Mid-call negotiations may be carried out in exceptional cases, see clause 7.3. + +Indication of such support entails assigning RTP payload types to VBD as well as the codecs. + +The mechanisms for negotiation vary depending on the endpoint's capabilities exchange protocols used, which can be the session description protocol (defined in [IETF RFC 4566]) or [ITU-T H.245]; the call control protocol, such as those defined in [ITU-T H.323], and the session + +initiation protocol (SIP), defined in [IETF RFC 3261]; and/or the media gateway control protocols such as those defined in [ITU-T H.248.1] and [b-ITU-T J.171]. + +This clause shall describe negotiation procedures for mechanisms that use: + +- The session description protocol (SDP) defined in [IETF RFC 4566]), such as, but not limited to, SIP terminals/gateways and ITU-T H.248 gateways; +- [ITU-T H.245] that complies with [ITU-T H.323]. + +This Recommendation does not preclude the gateways from negotiating support of other mechanisms such as IETF RFC 4733 telephone-events, [ITU-T T.38], [ITU-T V.150.1] and/or text relay, for transporting non-voice signals. RTP shall be used for the transport of VBD. + +## **7.1 Negotiation using the session description protocol** + +For implementations that use the session description protocol, the "gpmid" (general-purpose media descriptor) attribute shall be used to associate payload types in a media information ('m') line with VBD mode. + +### **7.1.0 New SDP attributes** + +#### **7.1.0.1 VBD support indication (a=gpmid:)** + +The general form of this attribute line is: + +``` +a=gpmid: +``` + +In the context of VBD declaration, the must be an RTP/AVP payload type. The is a semicolon-separated list of "parameter=value" pairs. For RTP/AVP formats, these pairs address parameters that are not part of their standard MIME definition. For sessions supporting this Recommendation, the parameter of interest is the Boolean 'vbd' that may have the value of 'yes' or 'no'. When set to 'yes', the attribute indicates that the implementation supports VBD mode as described in this Recommendation. + +Omission of the "gpmid" attribute with a "vbd=yes" attribute/value pair for any codec in the SDP session description shall be construed as non-support of VBD mode operation as defined in this Recommendation. + +Setting vbd=no is an explicit indication that the payload type will not be used for vbd. + +Note that this is not the same as omitting the gpmid attribute with vbd. + +The payload type marked for voice-band data (VBD) treatment should be a dynamic payload type. It is possible that a codec, such as PCMU, be declared with both static and dynamic payload types, with only one of the two marked for voice-band data use (see example 1 below). If a codec, such a PCMU or PCMA, is declared with only a static payload type, and is also marked for voice-band data use, then this codec must not be used for carrying voice (see example 2 below). + +#### **7.1.0.2 Packetization time (a=maxptime:)** + +In addition to negotiating support of ITU-T V.152 and the corresponding RTP payload type, an ITU-T V.152 implementation should include the 'maxptime' attribute (maximum multiple ptime) to indicate the supported packetization period for all codec payload types. + +``` +a=maxptime: +``` + +This attribute is a media-level attribute. The maxptime attribute defines a list of maximum packetization time values, expressed in milliseconds, the endpoint is capable of using (sending and receiving) for this connection. There shall be precisely one entry in the list for each entry provided in the "m=" line. Each entry is separated by a space. Entry number j in this list defines the maximum packetization time for entry number j in the "m=" line. The first entry in the list shall be a + +decimal number whereas subsequent entries in the list shall be either a decimal number or a hyphen. For those media formats where a single maximum packetization rate does not apply (e.g., non-voice codecs such as telephone-event or comfort noise), a hyphen ("-") shall be included at the corresponding location in the list of packetization periods. + +When receiving an SDP session description, the maxmptime attribute conveys the list of maximum packetization periods that the remote endpoint is capable of using for this connection; one for each media format in the "m=" line. For media formats whose packetization period is specified as a hyphen ("-"), the VBD gateway shall use one of the maximum packetization periods that was actually specified in the list. + +The "a=ptime" attribute, defined in [IETF RFC 4566], shall be ignored if the SDP session description contains the "maxmptime" attribute. + +If the "maxmptime" attribute is absent, then the value of the "ptime" attribute, if present, shall be taken as indicating the packetization period for all codecs present in the "m=" line. + +If neither the 'ptime' nor 'maxmptime' attribute are present in the SDP session description, then an ITU-T V.152 implementation shall assume the default packetization period defined in [IETF RFC 3550] (which is 20 ms for ITU-T G.711 and ITU-T G.726-32k). An ITU-T V.152 implementation shall not transmit ITU-T V.152 packets with a packetization time greater than the one offered by the remote end. + +#### 7.1.0.3 Examples + +Several application scenario examples are provided below. + +##### 7.1.0.3.1 Example 1 – Multiple audio and multiple VBD codec types + +Below is an SDP-related example that indicates support of ITU-T V.152 as per this Recommendation. For clarity purposes, the example only shows the media descriptions of the SDP session description. + +Table 1 provides the encoding of example 1 using Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax. + +Figure 1 illustrates the four possible media configurations, offered in this example. + +Table 2 provides the encoding of example 1 in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax. + +Table 1 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 1" offer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 98 99
a=maxmptime:10 10 - - 20 20
a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:96 0-15, 34, 35
a=rtpmap:98 PCMU/8000
a=gpmd:98 vbd=yes
a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000
a=gpmd:99 vbd=yes | In the example, static payload type '0' and dynamic payload type '98' each represent the encoding format 'PCMU'. The payload type '0' is not associated with VBD. The payload types '98' (PCMU) and '99' (32 kbit/s ADPCM) are, however, associated with VBD. Concerning the maximum packetization times for each payload type: Voice packets use 10 ms, VBD packets use 20 ms, and a dash is assigned to payload types 13 (silence indication packets) and 96 (IETF RFC 4733) packets) indicating that a maximum ptime is not applicable or necessary. | + +![Diagram showing potential media configurations for VoIP and VBD codecs. The top section, 'Audio mode (VoIP)', contains 'G.729 without silence suppression' and 'G.711 μ-law with silence suppression', with a '10 ms maximum packetization time' note. The bottom section, 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)', contains 'G.711 μ-Law' and 'G.726-32', with a '20 ms maximum packetization time' note. A 'Session Configurations' box with a dashed line connects the two sections. Four numbered lines (1-4) show combinations: 1 (G.729 to G.711), 2 (G.729 to G.726-32), 3 (G.711 to G.726-32), and 4 (G.711 to G.729).](fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing potential media configurations for VoIP and VBD codecs. The top section, 'Audio mode (VoIP)', contains 'G.729 without silence suppression' and 'G.711 μ-law with silence suppression', with a '10 ms maximum packetization time' note. The bottom section, 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)', contains 'G.711 μ-Law' and 'G.726-32', with a '20 ms maximum packetization time' note. A 'Session Configurations' box with a dashed line connects the two sections. Four numbered lines (1-4) show combinations: 1 (G.729 to G.711), 2 (G.729 to G.726-32), 3 (G.711 to G.726-32), and 4 (G.711 to G.729). + +**Figure 1 – Potential media configurations offered in example 1** + +**Table 2 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 1" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; SESSION CONFIGURATIONS a=sescap:1 1,3 ; VoIP = G729, VBDoIP = V.152 (PCMU) a=sescap:2 1,4 ; VoIP = G729, VBDoIP = V.152 (G726) a=sescap:3 2,3 ; VoIP = PCMU, VBDoIP = V.152 (PCMU) a=sescap:4 2,4 ; VoIP = PCMU, VBDoIP = V.152 (G726)  ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 98 99 a=maxmptime:10 10 - - 20 20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:96 0-15, 34, 35 a=rtpmap:98 PCMU/8000 a=gpmid:98 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000 a=gpmid:99 vbd=yes ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONS a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP & VBDoIP a=acap:1 ptime:10 ; for Audio mode a=acap:2 ptime:20 ; for VBD mode a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec 1 a=mcap:2,5 PCMU/8000 ; audio codec 2 & VBD codec 1 a=mcap:3 CN/8000 ; comfort noise for audio c. 2 a=mcap:4 telephone-event/8000 ; NTE codec a=mcap:6 G726-32/8000 ; VBD codec 2 
|

Offered (4) session configurations:

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU) & NTE ([IETF RFC 4733])
  • • Preference 2: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 G.726-32) & NTE ([IETF RFC 4733])
  • • Preference 3: Audio (PCMU including silence suppression), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU) & NTE ([IETF RFC 4733])
  • • Preference 4: Audio (PCMU including silence suppression), VBD (ITU-T V.152 G.726-32) & NTE ([IETF RFC 4733])

NOTE – The "a=-ms" operator is used to remove all legacy attribute lines on session and media description level.

The two audio and two VBD settings are defined as individual potential configurations, in order to assign individual packetization times. This approach allows to avoid usage of "a=maxmptime:" parameter. The concept of session configurations is applied for the four audio/VBD combinations.

| + +**Table 2 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 1" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +| a=mfcap:4 0-15,32-35 ; value range DTMF &
VBD stimuli
a=mscap:5 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU
a=mscap:6 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 G726-32
a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,4 pt=1:18,4:96
a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=2,3,4
pt=2:0,3:13,4:96
a=pcfg:3 t=1 a=-ms:2 m=5 pt=5:98
a=pcfg:4 t=1 a=-ms:2 m=6 pt=6:99 | | + +The following main advantages may be noted concerning Revised versus Legacy SDP Offer/Answer: + +- the ITU-T V.152 introduced SDP attribute "*a=maxptime*:" may be replaced by IETF SDP elements; +- there is an explicit indicated, preferred order with regard to the offered media configurations (this is missing in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer: it is unclear, e.g., whether configuration 2 is preferred over configuration 3 or vice versa); and +- the answerer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer could select both audio codecs and/or both VBD codecs (which may require subsequent Offer/Answer cycles). + +##### 7.1.0.3.2 Example 2 – Single audio codec, two VBD codec options + +Table 3 provides the encoding of example 2 in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax. + +Figure 2 illustrate the two possible media configurations, offered in this example. + +**Table 3 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 2" offer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 18 98
a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes
a=rtpmap:98 G726-32/8000
a=gpmd:98 vbd=yes
a=ptime:20 | In this example, the static payload type '0' (PCMU) is marked for VBD treatment, along with the dynamic payload type '98' (mapped to 32 kbit/s ADPCM). Thus, payload type '0' must not be used for carrying voice. It also indicates that the VBD gateway can receive voice and VBD packets with a size of 20 ms. | + +![Diagram illustrating potential media configurations for audio and voiceband data modes.](76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two main sections: 'Audio codec' and 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'. The 'Audio codec' section contains a box for 'G.729 without silence suppression' with a '20 ms packetization time' label. The 'Voiceband data mode' section contains two boxes: 'G.711 μ-law' and 'G.726-32', both with a '20 ms packetization time' label. A dashed box labeled 'Potential Configurations:' is connected to the 'G.729 without silence suppression' box by a line labeled '1' and to the 'G.726-32' box by a line labeled '2'. The 'G.711 μ-law' box is also connected to the 'G.729 without silence suppression' box by a line labeled '1'. + +Diagram illustrating potential media configurations for audio and voiceband data modes. + +**Figure 2 – Potential media configurations offered in example 2** + +NOTE – The use of static payload types for VBD is strongly discouraged because there is a danger that a non-ITU-T V.152 system would see a proposal with, say, [ITU-T G.711] VBD and [ITU-T G.729]. However, not understanding the VBD attributes, it may consider ITU-T G.711 as a valid audio codec. However, network operators may prefer that [ITU-T G.711] not be utilized, except in the case where VBD is necessary, and that all voice shall be [ITU-T G.729]. To illustrate this point, consider this offer: + +``` +m=audio 15400 RTP/AVP 0 18 +a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes +``` + +and consider this answer: + +``` +m=audio 15400 RTP/AVP 0 18 +``` + +The systems would then, most likely, communicate using [ITU-T G.711], rather than the intended [ITU-T G.729], for voice. This is a possible issue and inherent to Legacy SDP Offer/Answer protocol. This problem may be avoided by explicit potential configuration in Revised SDP Offer/Answer, see Table 4. + +**Table 4 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 2" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 18 98 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:98 G726-32/8000 a=gpmd:98 vbd=yes a=ptime:20 ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP & VBDoIP a=acap:1 ptime:20 ; common packetization time a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec a=mcap:2 PCMU/8000 ; VBD codec 1 a=mcap:3 G726-32/8000 ; VBD codec 2 a=mscap:2 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=mscap:3 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 G726-32 a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,2 pt=1:18,2:0 a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,3 pt=1:18,3:98 
|

Offered (2) potential configurations:

  • • Preference 1:
    Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
  • • Preference 2:
    Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 G.726-32)

If answerer supports Revised SDP Offer/Answer protocol, then either potential configuration 1 or 2 is selected, but not both.

| + +### 7.1.1 Mechanism for indicating support of ITU-T V.152 using ITU-T H.248/Megaco + +Under ITU-T H.248, the media gateway controller (MGC) uses local and remote descriptors to reserve and commit MG resources for media decoding and encoding for the given stream(s) and termination to which they apply. The MG includes these descriptors in its response to indicate what it is actually prepared to support. When text encoding the protocol, the descriptors consist of SDP session descriptions that describe the call capabilities. + +Support of ITU-T V.152 shall only be applied on ephemeral terminations via the local and/or remote descriptors. + +For an MG to reserve and commit resources for more than one call capability alternative, the MGC must set the ReserveGroup and ReserveValue properties of the LocalControlDescriptor to 'True'. + +Thus, if a list of payload types is offered in a local and/or remote descriptor, such as the following example 3 of an Add ephemeral termination command illustrates (the same applies if the command was a Modify or Move), the media gateway will select from the list only those payloads for which it can reserve and commit resources and shall send a reply to the MGC containing the alternatives for the local and/or remote descriptor that it selected, as described in [ITU-T H.248.1]: + +**Table 5 – Example ITU-T H.248 encoding (example 3a)** + +| ITU-T H.248 text encoding | Comments | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 1) MGC request (MGC to MG): MEGACO/3 [123.123.123.4]:55555 Transaction = 11 {   Context = \$ {     Add = \$ {       Media {         Stream = 1 {           LocalControl { 
|

The MGC requests support for four media configurations:

  • • two audio configurations ('G.729' and 'PCMU' codec types); and
  • • two VBDoIP configurations (VBD codec types 'PCMU' and 'G.726-32').
| + +**Table 5 – Example ITU-T H.248 encoding (example 3a)** + +| ITU-T H.248 text encoding | Comments | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +|
 Mode = RecOnly, ReserveGroup = ON, ReserveValue = ON }, Local {   v=0   c=IN IP4 \$   m=audio \$ RTP/AVP 18 0 98 99   a=rtpmap:98 PCMU/8000   a=gpmid:98 vbd=yes   a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000   a=gpmid:99 vbd=yes }; IP termination for audio and VBD } } } } } 
| | +|
 2) MG reply (MG to MGC response):  MEGACO/3 [123.123.123.4]:55555 Transaction = 11 {   Context = 34444 {     Add = Te/1 {       Media {         Stream = 1 {           LocalControl {             Mode = RecOnly,             ReserveGroup = ON,             ReserveValue = ON           },           Local {             v=0             c=IN IP4 11.09.19.65             m=audio 1970 RTP/AVP 18 0 98 99             a=rtpmap:98 PCMU/8000             a=gpmid:98 vbd=yes             a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000             a=gpmid:99 vbd=yes           }; IP termination for audio and VBD         }       }     }   } } 
| | + +Alternatively, an MGC may leave it up to the MG whether it wants to indicate that it supports VBD, as per this Recommendation, and to select its dynamic payload type for VBD mode of operation by including CHOOSE (i.e., \$) in the payload type list field as example 3b illustrates: + +**Table 6 – Example ITU-T H.248 encoding (example 3b)** + +| H.248 text encoding | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 1) MGC request (MGC to MG): MEGACO/3 [123.123.123.4]:55555 Transaction = 11 {   Context = \$ {     Add = \$ {       Media {         Stream = 1 {           LocalControl {             Mode = RecOnly,             ReserveGroup = ON,             ReserveValue = ON           },           Local {             v=0             c=IN IP4 \$             m=audio \$ RTP/AVP 18 0 \$ ; Wildcard                                 ; in format list           }; IP termination for audio and VBD         }       }     }   } } 
|

The MGC applies the wildcard CHOOSE ('\$') in the media description:

  • the wildcard is in the format list (see also clause 6.11 of [ITU-T H.248.39]);
  • such an underspecification implies "a priori knowledge" at the MG side, in order to choose an "appropriate" media format;
  • e.g., it is expected that the MG selects a VBDolP format, but not anything else (like, e.g., another audio codec type);
  • such kind of behaviour is either under the responsibility of the network management or could be defined in an ITU-T H.248 profile specification.
| +|
 2) MG reply (MG to MGC response): MEGACO/3 [123.123.123.4]:55555 Transaction = 11 {   Context = 34444 {     Add = Te/1 {       Media {         Stream = 1 {           LocalControl {             Mode = RecOnly,             ReserveGroup = ON,             ReserveValue = ON           },           Local {             v=0             c=IN IP4 11.09.19.65             m=audio 1970 RTP/AVP 18 0 98 99             a=rtpmap:98 PCMU/8000             a=gpmid:98 vbd=yes             a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000             a=gpmid:99 vbd=yes ; The MGC should                                 ; supply sufficient information                                 ; for unambiguous resource                                 ; selections by the MG,                                 ; see clause 7.1.8 of                                 ; [ITU-T Rec. H.248.1] Version 3           }; IP termination for audio and VBD         }       }     }   } } 
|

The MG selects two VBDolP configurations (besides the two audio configurations 'G.729' and 'PCMU'):

  • the selection of multiple media configurations is due to ReserveValue 'True';
  • the MGC knows now by this response that the MG supports the two requested audio formats and furthermore two VBDolP configurations with VBD codecs 'PCMU' and 'G.726-32';
  • it is expected that there will be a further MGC/MG request/response cycle in order to enable (at least) just a single VBDolP configuration (because multiple VBD configurations (but also multiple audio configurations) are typically meaningless from service perspective);
  • thus, the MGC would use ReserveValue 'False' in the subsequent request.
| + +**Table 6 – Example ITU-T H.248 encoding (example 3b)** + +| H.248 text encoding | Comments | +|------------------------|----------| +|
 } } } } } 
| | + +Once an MG has acknowledged a set of call capability alternatives, the MG is requested to reserve resources so that it can decode or encode the media stream according to any of the alternatives. Thus, in the above example 3a, if the MG supports [ITU-T G.729] and [ITU-T G.711] for audio and [ITU-T G.711] for VBD, (as per this Recommendation), then, in accordance with [ITU-T H.248.1], the MG must reserve resources such that it can decode one RTP stream in any of the formats in its response at any time during the call, i.e., ITU-T G.711 audio format, ITU-T G.729 audio format or ITU-T G.711 VBD format. + +If a specific relay mechanism (e.g., ITU-T T.38, ITU-T V.150.1, etc.) is indicated as the preferred mechanism above that of VBD, then, for the applicable devices, the relay mechanisms shall be used instead of VBD. For example, if a remote descriptor indicates ITU-T T.38 as preferred over VBD, then an MG shall use ITU-T T.38 for all G3FE equipment instead of VBD. + +This is a request for multiple media groups. There must be an order of preference. The preference may be either the "descending order rule" of ITU-T H.248 in case of a complete parameter specification by the MGC concerning the preferred media names, or a corresponding rule shall be provisioned in both ITU-T H.248 MG peers in case of "parameter under specification" (in ITU-T H.248 descriptors) by MGC. + +If an MG cannot guarantee that it can commit and reserve the resources for VBD for the call being set up, then, in accordance with [ITU-T H.248.1], it shall not include the 'gpmd' attribute (that indicates support of ITU-T V.152) in its response SDP session description. + +Note that this mechanism does not preclude an ITU-T H.248 MG implementation from sending to the MGC observedEvents indicating signals detected, as described in [ITU-T H.248.2] (e.g., call type discrimination package). + +#### **7.1.2 Mechanism for indicating support of ITU-T V.152 using SIP** + +A gateway answering an SDP session description offer that shows the capability to perform the relay model described in [IETF RFC 3264] shall be used to earmark one or more RTP payload types for VBD operation as defined in this Recommendation. + +Just as a SIP-compliant terminal would indicate support of more than one audio codec payload or support of other payload types (e.g., [IETF RFC 4733] for DTMF relay) within a media stream, a SIP-compliant implementation shall indicate support of [ITU-T V.152] by including the payload types as described in clause 7.1. + +If multiple media descriptions are being offered and if the implementations cannot support simultaneous reception and transmission of the various media types, then the 'group', 'mid' and 'FID' attributes described in [IETF RFC 3388] shall be used to indicate alternative support of each of the offered media types (as illustrated below in example 5). + +Once a gateway has indicated support of [ITU-T V.152] in addition to other mechanisms within an SDP session description (such as, but not limited to, audio, facsimile relay via ITU-T T.38 DTMF relay as per [IETF RFC 4733], etc.), the gateway shall be capable of switching between any of the supported, and mutually negotiated, RTP payload types, at any time during a call. + +#### 7.1.2.1 Mechanism for indicating preference of VoIP relay mechanisms above VBD + +SIP currently does not have a mechanism for indicating in a clear manner that a gateway would like to use a specific relay mechanism (e.g., ITU-T T.38, ITU-T V.150.1, text relay) instead of VBD. Hence, this clause defines the syntax and use of an attribute that indicates a preference list of modem and facsimile transport methods in an ITU-T V.152 implementation that supports any of the following alternative transport methods: + +- facsimile relay of IP via [ITU-T T.38]; +- modem relay over IP via [ITU-T V.150.1]; +- text relay. + +##### 7.1.2.1.1 SDP attribute for transport method indication (a=pmft:) + +The 'pmft' attribute and its formatting in the SDP session description is described by the following ABNF syntax: + +``` +pmft-attribute = "a=pmft:" *(SPACE modem-fax-transport) +modem-fax-transport = 1* ("V1501" / "T38" / "V151") +``` + +This attribute allows an ITU-T V.152 implementation to indicate whether it prefers any of the listed relay transport mechanism above the VBD mode. Omission of this attribute in an SDP session description means that VBD mode is the preferred transport mechanism of voice-band data. + +When included in an SDP session description, this attribute shall always be placed at the session level. + +For example, an ITU-T V.152 implementation that also supports [ITU-T V.150.1] for modems and [ITU-T T.38] for facsimile, and prefers to use these relay mechanisms whenever possible instead of VBD, shall include, at the session level of the SDP session description, the following 'pmft' attribute: + +``` +a=pmft: T38 V1501 +``` + +An ITU-T V.152 implementation that receives the above 'pmft' attribute, and is able to support both the relay mechanisms specified in this example, shall include the same 'pmft' attribute in its response. Thus, when the call is set up, all G3FE shall be transported via [ITU-T T.38]; voice-band modems that are supported by [ITU-T V.150.1] shall be transported via [ITU-T V.150.1] and all other modems (e.g., text telephones) shall be transported by [ITU-T V.152]. + +A gateway answering an SDP session description offer that includes the 'pmft' attribute, if indicating preference of the supported relay mechanism over VBD, shall include in the response SDP session description the 'pmft' attribute with the relay mechanism specified. If a relay mechanism is not supported, then that relay mechanism shall be removed from the list of the pmft attribute. + +Once a specific relay mechanism (e.g., ITU-T T.38, ITU-T V.150.1, etc.) is indicated as the preferred mechanism above that of VBD, such relay mechanisms shall be used instead of VBD. + +A gateway answering an SDP session description offer that shows the capability to perform relay mechanisms but does not include the 'pmft' attribute may include in the response SDP session description the 'pmft' attribute with the relay mechanisms specified to show a preference to use these. + +##### 7.1.2.1.2 Examples – Preferences VBDolP (ITU-T V.152) versus FoIP (ITU-T T.38) + +For example: if the initial SDP session description offer from a gateway that only supports [ITU-T V.152] and [ITU-T T.38] does not include the 'pmft' attribute because it prefers to use VBD above ITU-T T.38, then it would include an SDP session description such as the one described in Table 7 for in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax. + +**Table 7 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 1) OFFER: v=0 o=Offerer 0 0 IN IPV4 <IPAddressA> s=- t=0 0 p=+1 965 1109-1965 c=IN IP4 <IPAddressA> a=group:FID 1 2 m=audio <udpPort x> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 a=mid:1 a=ptime:10 a=rtpmap:96 PCMU/8000 a=gpmid: 96 vbd=yes m=image <udpPort y> udptl t38 a=mid:2 a=T38version:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy 
|

[IETF RFC 3388] is required in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer in order to indicate two media configurations in parallel: 1) audio VoIP or ITU-T V.152 VBDolP, and 2) ITU-T T.38 FoIP.

The example offer provides two audio codecs for VoIP.

| +|
 2) ANSWER: v=0 o=Answerer 0 0 IN IPV4 <IPAddressB> s=- t=0 0 p=+1 965 0203-1970 c=IN IP4 <IPAddressB> a=group:FID 1 2 a=pmft: T38 m=audio <udpPort x> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 a=mid:1 a=ptime:10 a=rtpmap:96 PCMU/8000 a=gpmid: 96 vbd=yes m=image <udpPort y> udptl t38 a=mid:2 a=T38version:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy 
|

However, the answerer gateway (that may not be in as reliable a network) may always prefer ITU-T T.38 over VBD for facsimile transmission. Thus, it would include in its response, e.g., such an answer.

| + +Figure 3 illustrates the four possible media configurations, offered in this example, and positively acknowledged by the answerer. + +![Diagram showing four potential session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs (G.729, G.711) to voiceband data modes (V.152, T.38) and fax relay modes.](a74294f34a0c736b7ee0f5f0cdca7e28_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates four potential session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs to voiceband data modes and fax relay modes. The top section, labeled 'Audio codecs', contains two boxes: 'G.729 without silence suppression' and 'G.711 μ-law with silence suppression'. The bottom section, labeled 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)', contains two boxes: 'G.711 μ-Law' (labeled 'VBD codec') and 'T.38-UDPTL/UDP' (labeled 'Fax relay codec'). A dashed box labeled 'Session Configurations:' points to the connections. Configuration 1 connects G.729 to G.711 μ-Law. Configuration 2 connects G.711 μ-law to T.38-UDPTL/UDP. Configuration 3 connects G.729 to T.38-UDPTL/UDP. Configuration 4 connects G.711 μ-law to G.711 μ-Law. + +Diagram showing four potential session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs (G.729, G.711) to voiceband data modes (V.152, T.38) and fax relay modes. + +**Figure 3 – Potential session configurations offered in this example** + +The offerer gateway, on receipt of such an answer, shall transport G3FE data using ITU-T T.38, i.e., potential configuration 3 or 4) and all other modems, or non-G3FE must be transported via ITU-T V.152 (i.e., potential configuration 1 or 2). There are still two audio options (due to two audio codecs). Such a situation is unfortunate (because it is not required for VoIP applications) and may be resolved by a subsequent negotiation cycle. Alternatively, a single cycle negotiation, using Revised SDP Offer/Answer, may be applied (Table 8). + +**Table 8 – Example SDP encoding: O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
1) OFFER: ; SESSION CONFIGURATIONs a=sescap:1 1      ; VoIP = G.729, VBDolP = V.152 (G.711) a=sescap:2 2      ; VoIP = G.711, VBDolP = V.152 (G.711) a=sescap:3 3,5    ; VoIP = G.729, FoIP = T.38 UDPTL/UDP a=sescap:4 4,5    ; VoIP = G.711, FoIP = T.38 UDPTL/UDP  ; LATENT CONFIGURATION for T.38 a=tcap:2 udptl    ; T.38 FoUDPTL/UDP transport variant a=mcap:5 t38      ; T.38 FoIP codec (subtype = 't38') a=acap:11 T38FaxVersion:0 a=acap:12 T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=acap:13 T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy a=acap:14 (... additional T.38 attributes may be included) a=lcfg:5 mt=image t=2 m=5 a=11,12,13,14,...
|

[IETF RFC 3388] is not required! Potential parallel media configurations (for ITU-T T.38 if G3FE stimuli are detected) are specified via the concept of session configurations in Revised SDP Offer/Answer. The ITU-T T.38 media configuration relates to a latent configuration because call may start with speech phase first:

Offered (2) potential session configurations: see Figure 3.

| + +**Table 8 – Example SDP encoding: O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) ... omitted, see Table 7 ... ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP and VBD oIP a=acap:1ptime:10 a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec 1 a=mcap:2,4 PCMU/8000 ; audio codec 2 and VBD codec a=mcap:3 CN/8000 ; comfort noise for audio c. 2 a=mscap:4 gpm d vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,4 pt=1:18,4:96 a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=2,3,4 pt=1:0,3:13,4:96 a=pcfg:3 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1 pt=1:18 a=pcfg:4 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=2,3 pt=1:0,3:13 
| | +|
 2) ANSWER: ... 
|

Answerer would, e.g., just acknowledge session configuration 1 (for ITU-T V.152, non-G3FE modem) and 3 (for ITU-T T.38 G3FE emulation) if [ITU-T G.729] is supported (and thus the selected audio codec).

| + +The following main advantages may be noted concerning Revised versus Legacy SDP Offer/Answer: + +- the ITU-T V.152 introduced SDP attribute "*a=pmft:*" may be replaced by IETF SDP syntax ("order principle within session and potential configurations in Revised SDP Offer/Answer"); +- [IETF RFC 3388] is not required because parallel media configurations are specified via the concept of session configurations in Revised SDP Offer/Answer; and +- single cycle negotiation (because Answerer would already select 1-out-of-2 audio codecs). + +#### 7.1.3 Examples of indicating support for ITU-T V.152 using the session description protocol + +This clause shall provide a few examples of SDP session descriptions sent by implementations that support ITU-T V.152 in addition to other Recommendations (such as, but not limited to, voice, [ITU-T T.38], ToIP, and [ITU-T V.150.1]). + +#### 7.1.3.1 Example 4 – Two audio codecs and one VBD codec (overlapping with audio) + +An implementation that supports ITU-T V.152 (using the dynamic payload type 96 and ITU-T G.711 $\mu$ -law as the VBD codec) and the voice codecs ITU-T G.711 $\mu$ -law, silence suppression and ITU-T G.729, shall transmit the following SDP session description, only those lines that are relevant to this Recommendation are highlighted in bold, see Table 9. + +Figure 4 illustrates the two possible media configurations, offered in this example. + +**Table 9 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 4" offer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +|
 1) OFFER: v=0 o=- 0 0 IN IPV4 <IPAddressA> s=- t=0 0 p=+1 c=IN IP4 <IPAddressA> m=audio <udpPort A> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 a=ptime:10 a=rtpmap:96 PCMU/8000 a=gpmid: 96 vbd=yes 
| | + +![Diagram illustrating potential media configurations for audio codecs and VBD codec.](a149b400127a3e3e50b3c98d27c5935c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates potential media configurations. It is divided into two main sections: 'Audio mode (VoIP)' and 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'. The 'Audio mode (VoIP)' section contains two 'Audio codecs': 'G.729 without silence suppression (Tp = 10 ms)' and 'G.711 μ-law with silence suppression (Tp = 10 ms)'. The 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)' section contains one 'VBD codec': 'G.711 μ-Law (Tp = 10 ms)'. A dashed box labeled 'Potential Configurations:' points to two possible connections: '1' connects the 'G.729' codec to the 'G.711 μ-Law' VBD codec, and '2' connects the 'G.711 μ-law' codec to the 'G.711 μ-Law' VBD codec. + +Diagram illustrating potential media configurations for audio codecs and VBD codec. + +**Figure 4 – Potential media configurations offered in this example** + +An ITU-T V.152 implementation that receives an SDP session description, as in the above example, shall interpret it as the remote gateway's capability to support ITU-T V.152 and that the payload type that shall be used for VBD packets is 96. + +The Legacy SDP Offer is unclear whether one or two audio codecs may be selected, e.g., the answerer may agree to both audio codecs ("which is for the emulation of PSTN modem calls not required"). This ambiguity may be avoided by the concept of potential configurations in Revised SDP Offer/Answer (see Table 10). + +**Table 10 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 4" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) m=audio <udpPort A> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 a=ptime:10 a=rtpmap:96 PCMU/8000 a=gpmd: 96 vbd=yes ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONS a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP and VBDoIP a=acap:1 ptime:10 ; common packetization time a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec 1 a=mcap:2,4 PCMU/8000 ; audio codec 2 and VBD codec 1 a=mcap:3 CN/8000 ; comfort noise for audio c. 2 a=mscap:4 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=--ms:1 m=1,4 pt=1:18,4:96 a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=--ms:1 m=2,3,4 pt=1:0,3:13,4:96 
|

Offered (2) potential configurations:

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
  • • Preference 2: Audio (PCMU incl. silence suppression), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
| + +#### 7.1.3.2 Example 5 – ITU-T V.152 to non-ITU-T V.152 (OCL with ITU-T V.152 and [ITU-T T.38], ACL without ITU-T V.152) + +A call is set up between gateway A that supports, the Supported Configuration (Codec) List $SCL_{A}$ , ITU-T V.152 with PCMU as VBD codec, ITU-T T.38 UDPTL/UDP, and voice codecs ITU-T G.729 and PCMU with [IETF RFC 3389] silence suppression and voice codec ITU-T G.729 and PCMU, and a Gateway B that supports ( $SCL_{B}$ ) ITU-T T.38 UDPTL/UDP, silence suppression and voice codecs ITU-T G.729 and PCMU inclusive silence suppression, but does not support ITU-T V.152. + +NOTE – Voice codec ITU-T G.729 is used here without silence suppression. This would require support of ITU-T G.729B and the correspondent SDP indication via attribute line "*a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes*". + +The SDP transmitted by gateway A, the Offered Configuration (Codec) List $OCL_{A}$ (= $SCL_{A}$ ), will be of the form described in the "Offer" in Table 11. + +Gateway B, which does not support VBD shall respond with an SDP, the Answered Configuration (Codec) List $ACL_{B}$ (= $SCL_{B}$ ), that omits all reference to ITU-T V.152 (see Answer in Table 11). + +**Table 11 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +|
 1) OFFER: v=0 o=GatewayA 0 0 IN IPV4 <IPAddressA> s=- t=0 0 p=+1 c=IN IP4 <IPAddressA> a=group:FID 1 2 m=audio <udpPort x> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 96 a=mid:1 a=ptime:10 a=rtpmap:96 PCMU/8000 a=gpmd: 96 vbd=yes m=image <udpPort y> udptl t38 a=mid:2 a=T38version:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy  (.....additional T.38 attributes may follow.....) 
| | +|
 2) ANSWER: v=0 o=GatewayB 0 0 IN IPV4 <IPAddressB> s=- t=0 0 p=+1 c=IN IP4 <IPAddressB> a=group:FID 1 2 m=audio <udpPort w> RTP/AVP 18 0 13 a=mid:1 a=ptime:10 m=image <udpPort z> udptl t38 a=mid:2 a=T38version:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy (.....additional T.38 attributes may follow.....) 
| | + +On receipt of the above SDP, gateway A shall understand that gateway B does not perform ITU-T V.152. Thus, gateway A shall not transition into a VBD mode. The agreed Negotiated Configuration (Codec) List NCL is thus equal to $ACL_B (= SCL_B)$ . The NCL contains both audio codecs, which might be a problem, at least an unfortunate and not desired situation for PSTN modem call types. + +Such an (single cycle O/A) NCL may be avoided by the usage of Revised SDP Offer/Answer (see Table 12), which allows to specify an OCL as Preferred Configuration (Codec) List PCLA. Figure 5 illustrates the four possible session configurations offered in this example. The Answerer is only supporting session configurations 3 and 4 (due to SCLB), and shall just acknowledge session configuration 3 due to its preference by the Offerer. + +![Figure 5: Potential session configurations offered in this example. The diagram shows four session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs to VBD or fax relay codecs. Audio mode (VoIP) includes G.729 without silence suppression and G.711 μ-law with silence suppression. Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP) includes G.711 μ-Law. Fax relay mode (T.38 FoIP) includes T.38-UDPTL/UDP. Connections: 1 (G.729 to G.711 μ-Law), 2 (G.711 μ-law to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), 3 (G.729 to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), 4 (G.711 μ-law to G.711 μ-Law).](5414f65867392f05ba0063b208eeb5e1_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates four potential session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs to VBD or fax relay codecs. The top section, 'Audio mode (VoIP)', contains two audio codecs: 'G.729 without silence suppression' and 'G.711 μ-law with silence suppression'. The bottom section, 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)', contains a 'VBD codec' labeled 'G.711 μ-Law'. The bottom right section, 'Fax relay mode (T.38 FoIP)', contains a 'Fax relay codec' labeled 'T.38-UDPTL/UDP'. The connections are: 1 (G.729 to G.711 μ-Law), 2 (G.711 μ-law to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), 3 (G.729 to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), and 4 (G.711 μ-law to G.711 μ-Law). A dashed box labeled 'Session Configurations:' points to the connections. + +Figure 5: Potential session configurations offered in this example. The diagram shows four session configurations (1, 2, 3, 4) connecting audio codecs to VBD or fax relay codecs. Audio mode (VoIP) includes G.729 without silence suppression and G.711 μ-law with silence suppression. Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP) includes G.711 μ-Law. Fax relay mode (T.38 FoIP) includes T.38-UDPTL/UDP. Connections: 1 (G.729 to G.711 μ-Law), 2 (G.711 μ-law to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), 3 (G.729 to T.38-UDPTL/UDP), 4 (G.711 μ-law to G.711 μ-Law). + +Figure 5 – Potential session configurations offered in this example + +Table 12 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
1) OFFER: ; SESSION CONFIGURATIONS a=sescap:1 1      ; VoIP = G.729, VBDolP = V.152 (G.711) a=sescap:2 2      ; VoIP = G.711, VBDolP = V.152 (G.711) a=sescap:3 3,5    ; VoIP = G.729, FoIP = T.38 UDPTL/UDP a=sescap:4 4,5    ; VoIP = G.711, FoIP = T.38 UDPTL/UDP  ; LATENT CONFIGURATION for T.38 a=tcap:2 udptl    ; T.38 FoUDPTL/UDP transport variant a=mcap:5 t38      ; T.38 FoIP codec (subtype = 't38') a=acap:11 T38FaxVersion:0 a=acap:12 T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=acap:13 T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy a=acap:14 (... additional T.38 attributes may be included) a=lcfg:5 mt=image t=2 m=5 a=11,12,13,14,...  ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) ... omitted ... ;
|

Offered (4) potential configurations (as session configurations due to 'voice' and 'facsimile'):

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
  • • Preference 2: Audio (PCMU with silence suppression), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
  • • Preference 3: Audio (ITU-T G.729) and fax relay (ITU-T T.38 FoUDPTL/UDP)
  • • Preference 4: Audio (PCMU) and fax relay (ITU-T T.38 FoUDPTL/UDP)
| + +**Table 12 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP and VBD oIP a=acap:1ptime:10 a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec 1 a=mcap:2,4 PCMU/8000 ; audio codec 2 and VBD codec a=mcap:3 CN/8000 ; comfort noise for audio c. 2 a=mscap:4 gpm d vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,4 pt=1:18,4:96 a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=2,3,4 pt=1:0,3:13,4:96 a=pcfg:3 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1 pt=1:18 a=pcfg:4 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=2,3 pt=1:0,3:13 
| | +|
 2) ANSWER: ... a=sescap:3 
|

The Answerer selects the 3rd session configuration.

| + +#### 7.1.3.3 Example 6 – ITU-T V.152 to non-ITU-T V.152 (OCL with ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T V.150.1, ACL without ITU-T V.152) + +Gateway A supports voice codecs ITU-T G.729, ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T V.150.1. Gateway B also supports ITU-T V.150.1 and voice codec ITU-T G.729 but does not support ITU-T V.152. + +NOTE – This example 6 shows the minimum number of lines needed to construct an SDP-compliant session descriptor that includes all attributes that are mandatory for the representation of SPRT modem relay and ITU-T V.152. + +In this example, ports 49230 and 49232 (see Offer in Table 13) are used for the RTP/AVP and SPRT media streams, respectively. Within the RTP/AVP media stream, the static payload types of 0 (PCMU) and 8 (PCMA) are marked for VBD treatment via the 'gpm d' attribute, and thus cannot be used for voice. + +Also note, in accordance with SIP, the SDP in Table 13 implies simultaneous support of audio 'rtp/avp' and audio 'udpsprt'. To indicate that only one media type can be supported at a time, the 'group' attribute with the FID semantics, together with the 'mid' attribute, should be used as specified in [IETF RFC 3388] (see example 5, clause 7.1.3.2). + +Gateway B does not support ITU-T V.150.1 (implementations which also must support VBD). Gateway B shall respond with an SDP as follows (see Answer in Table 13). + +**Table 13 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +|
 1) OFFER: SDP from Gateway A: v=0 o=Gateway A 25678 753849 IN IP4 128.96.41.1 s= c=IN IP4 128.96.41.1 t=0 0 m=audio 49230 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 97 98 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=gpmd:8 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:97 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:97 0-15,32,33,34,35,66,70 a=rtpmap:98 v150fw/8000 m=audio 49232 udpsprt 100 a=sprtmap:100 v150mr/8000 a=fmtp:100 mr=0; mg=1;DSCselect=3;mrmodes=1,2;jmdelay=no;versn =1.1 
| | +|
 2) ANSWER: v=0 o=GatewayB 25678 753849 IN IP4 128.96.41.1 s= c=IN IP4 128.96.41.1 t=0 0 m=audio 49230 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 97 98 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=gpmd:8 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:97 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:97 0-15,32,33,34,35,66,70 a=rtpmap:98 v150fw/8000 m=audio 49232 udpsprt 100 a=sprtmap:100 v150mr/8000 a=fmtp:100 mr=0; mg=1;DSCselect=3;mrmodes=1,2;jmdelay=no;versn =1.1 
| | + +Because both gateways have negotiated support of SSE, they shall use SSEs to indicate transition between voice and VBD. + +Figure 6 illustrates the three possible session configurations, offered in this example. The Answerer is not supporting session configuration 3 (due to lack of support of [ITU-T V.150.1]), and is acknowledging session configuration 1 (due to support of PCMU as VBD codec), see Table 14. + +![Diagram showing potential session configurations for audio mode (VoIP). The top box is 'Audio mode (VoIP)' containing 'G.729 without silence suppression'. Three lines labeled 1, 2, and 3 connect this box to three boxes below. Line 1 connects to 'G.711 μ-law' (part of 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'). Line 2 connects to 'G.711 A-law' (also part of 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'). Line 3 connects to 'V.150.1 SPRT' (part of 'Modem relay mode (V.150.1 MoIP)'). A dashed box labeled 'Session Configurations:' encloses the three lines. A dashed box labeled 'VBD codecs' encloses the two G.711 boxes. A dashed box labeled 'Modem relay codec' encloses the V.150.1 SPRT box.](08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing potential session configurations for audio mode (VoIP). The top box is 'Audio mode (VoIP)' containing 'G.729 without silence suppression'. Three lines labeled 1, 2, and 3 connect this box to three boxes below. Line 1 connects to 'G.711 μ-law' (part of 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'). Line 2 connects to 'G.711 A-law' (also part of 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)'). Line 3 connects to 'V.150.1 SPRT' (part of 'Modem relay mode (V.150.1 MoIP)'). A dashed box labeled 'Session Configurations:' encloses the three lines. A dashed box labeled 'VBD codecs' encloses the two G.711 boxes. A dashed box labeled 'Modem relay codec' encloses the V.150.1 SPRT box. + +**Figure 6 – Potential session configurations offered in this example** + +**Table 14 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 1) OFFER: ; SESSION CONFIGURATIONs a=sescap:1 1      ; VoIP = G.729, VBDoIP = V.152 (PCMU) a=sescap:2 2      ; VoIP = G.729, VBDoIP = V.152 (PCMA) a=sescap:3 3,4    ; VoIP = G.729, MoIP = V.150.1 SPRT  ; LATENT CONFIGURATION for V.150.1 a=tcap:2 udpsprt  ; V.150.1 SPRT/UDP transport variant a=mcap:6 v150mr/8000 ; V.150.1 MoIP codec a=mfcap:6 mr=0; mg=1; CDSCselect=3; mrmodes=1,2;                     jmdelay=no; versn=1.1 a=lcfg:4 mt=audio t=2 m=6 pt=6:100  ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) ... omitted ... ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP  ; transport for VoIP,                   ; VBDoIP, SSEoIP & NTEoIP a=acap:1 ptime:10 a=mcap:1 G729/8000 ; audio codec a=mcap:2 PCMU/8000 ; VBD codec 1 a=mcap:3 PCMA/8000 ; VBD codec 2 a=mcap:4 telephone-event/8000 ; NTE codec a=mcap:5 v150fw/8000 ; SSE protocol 
|

Offered (4) potential configurations (as session configurations due to 'voice' and 'facsimile'):

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU)
  • • Preference 2: Audio (ITU-T G.729), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMA)
  • • Preference 3: Audio (ITU-T G.729) and modem relay (ITU-T V.150.1 using SPRT (simple packet relay transport over UDP))

Some MoIP configuration details:

  • – ITU-T V.8-compatible modem relay (mr = 0);
  • – media gateway of type "No Trans-compression" (mg = 1);
  • – Call discrimination mode selection "Mixed" (CDSCselect = 3);
  • – supported modulation types "1" (ITU-T V.34 duplex), "2" (ITU-T V.34 Half-duplex) (mrmodes = 1, 2);
  • – JM delay procedure "No" (jmdelay=no);
  • – state signalling event (SSE) protocol supports "Yes" (see v150fw declaration for SSE-over-RTP packets with PT = 98);
  • – SSE event types: "1" (initial audio), "3" (modem relay), "4" (text relay), "5" (fax relay);
| + +**Table 14 – Example SDP encoding – O/A cycle in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| a=mscap:2,3 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU & PCMA
a=mfcap:4 0-15,32-35,66,70 ; value range of NTE
a=mfcap:5 1,3-5 ; SSE event types
a=mfcap:5 expack=yes ; SSE reliability

a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,2,4
pt=1:18,2:96,4:97
a=pcfg:2 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,3,4
pt=1:18,3:99,4:97
a=pcfg:3 t=1 a=-ms:1 m=1,4,5
pt=1:18,4:97,5:98 | – SSE assured transport (using 'Explicit Acknowledgement' method). | +| 2) ANSWER:

...

a=sescap:1 | The Answerer selects the 1st session configuration. | + +#### 7.1.4 Optional ITU-T V.152 capabilities + +This clause describes the SDP representation of information that may be optionally declared at session establishment time. The absence of their declaration shall be construed by an ITU-T V.152 implementation as an indication that the remote ITU-T V.152 implementation does not support them. + +#### 7.1.4.1 Declaration of redundancy and forward error correction + +The declaration, in SDP, of [IETF RFC 2198] redundancy and [IETF RFC 5109] FEC, shall conform to the rules in the applicable IETF source documents. When supporting text telephones, on networks where the error character service requirements as specified in clause A.3 of [b-ITU-T F.700] is exceeded due to packet loss, then this Recommendation strongly encourages the appropriate use of [IETF RFC 2198] redundancy and [IETF RFC 5109] FEC for the IP network to which it is attached. However, on some networks, the application of redundancy/FEC may contribute to the character error rate and should not be used. + +##### 7.1.4.1.1 Example 7 – Packet redundancy for ITU-T V.152 with PCMU as VBD codec + +Although the [IETF RFC 2198] rules are not repeated here, declaring [IETF RFC 2198] support with a redundancy level of three for a VBD codec is illustrated with an example (see Tables 15 and 16). + +Figure 7 illustrates the offered media configuration in example 7. + +**Table 15 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 7" offer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +| 1) OFFER:
m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 15 102
a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes
a=rtpmap:102 red/8000
a=fmtp:102 0/0/0/0 | | + +![Diagram showing a potential media configuration. It consists of two main dashed boxes. The top box is labeled 'Audio codec' and contains 'Audio mode (VoIP)' and a rounded rectangle labeled 'G.728'. The bottom box is labeled 'VBD codec' and contains 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)' and a rounded rectangle labeled 'G.711 μ-law with Packet Redundancy'. A vertical line connects the bottom of the 'G.728' box to the top of the 'G.711 μ-law...' box, with a '1' on the line. A dashed oval labeled 'Potential Configuration:' points to this connection line.](f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg) + +Diagram showing a potential media configuration. It consists of two main dashed boxes. The top box is labeled 'Audio codec' and contains 'Audio mode (VoIP)' and a rounded rectangle labeled 'G.728'. The bottom box is labeled 'VBD codec' and contains 'Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDolP)' and a rounded rectangle labeled 'G.711 μ-law with Packet Redundancy'. A vertical line connects the bottom of the 'G.728' box to the top of the 'G.711 μ-law...' box, with a '1' on the line. A dashed oval labeled 'Potential Configuration:' points to this connection line. + +**Figure 7 – Potential media configuration offered in this example** + +**Table 16 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 7" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax** + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 ; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 15 102 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:102 red/8000 a=fmtp:102 0/0/0/0 ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP & VBDolP a=mcap:1 G728/8000 ; audio codec a=mcap:2 PCMU/8000 ; VBD codec a=mcap:3 RED/8000 ; RTP RFC 2198 redundancy a=mfcap:3 %2%/ %2%/ %2%/ %2% ; RFC 2198 redundancy format a=mscap:2 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms m=2,1,3 pt=2:0,1:15,3:102 
|

Offered potential configuration:

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.728), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU with packet redundancy)
| + +##### 7.1.4.1.2 Example 8 – Forward error correction for ITU-T V.152 with PCMU as VBD codec + +Examples of the declaration of FEC support are found in [IETF RFC 5109]. This includes the use of a separate FEC stream and the combination of the FEC stream with the primary stream via IETF RFC 2198 encapsulation. In the case when FEC is a separate stream, [IETF RFC 5109] uses an 'fmtp' line to associate this stream with an IP address and port. When FEC packets are sent to the same IP address and port (albeit a different SSRC) as the media packets they qualify, there is no need for the 'fmtp' line to associate the 'parityfec' payload type with an IP address and port. Thus, in the following SDP segment (see Table 17), the last line is superfluous and may be omitted. Likewise, the absence of an 'fmtp' line associating an IP address and port with a FEC payload type will be construed to mean that the FEC packets are to be sent to the same IP address and port as the media packets they qualify. + +Table 17 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 8" offer in Legacy SDP Offer/Answer syntax + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +|
1) OFFER: c=IN IP4 224.2.17.12 t=0 0 m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 15 78 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:78 parityfec/8000 a=fmtp:78 49170 IN IP4 224.2.17.12
| | + +Figure 8 illustrates the offered media configuration in example 8. + +![Diagram of potential media configuration showing Audio mode (VoIP) with G.728 codec and Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP) with G.711 μ-law with Forward Error Correction codec.](2837ffdadcdb1e5bababa56b564e56ed_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the potential media configuration offered in this example. It consists of two main dashed-line boxes. The top box is labeled "Audio mode (VoIP)" and contains a rounded rectangle labeled "Audio codec" containing "G.728". The bottom box is labeled "Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP)" and contains a rounded rectangle labeled "VBD codec" containing "G.711 μ-law with Forward Error Correction". A vertical dashed line labeled "Potential Configuration:" connects the two boxes, with a small oval and the number "1" indicating a specific configuration path. + +Diagram of potential media configuration showing Audio mode (VoIP) with G.728 codec and Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP) with G.711 μ-law with Forward Error Correction codec. + +Figure 8 – Potential media configuration offered in this example + +Table 18 – Example SDP encoding – "Example 8" offer in Revised SDP Offer/Answer syntax + +| SDP encoding (shortened SDP description) | Comments | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
; ACTUAL CONFIGURATION (due to backward compatibility) c=IN IP4 224.2.17.12 t=0 0 m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 15 78 a=gpmd:0 vbd=yes a=rtpmap:78 parityfec/8000 a=fmtp:78 49170 IN IP4 224.2.17.12 ; ; POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONs a=tcap:1 RTP/AVP ; transport for VoIP & VBDoIP a=mcap:1 G728/8000 ; audio codec a=mcap:2 PCMU/8000 ; VBD codec a=mcap:3 parityfec/8000 ; RTP RFC 5109 FEC a=mcap:2 gpmd vbd=yes ; for V.152 PCMU a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=-ms m=2,1,3 pt=2:0,1:15,3:78
|

Offered potential configuration:

  • • Preference 1: Audio (ITU-T G.728), VBD (ITU-T V.152 PCMU forward error correction)
| + +#### 7.1.4.2 Optional vendor-specific parameters + +The 'vndpar' (vendor parameters) attribute may be used to declare vendor codes for coordinating enhanced operation over and above those indicated in this Recommendation. It shall be possible to safely ignore vendor-specific parameters and still maintain interoperability with equipment conforming to this Recommendation. Hence, proprietary enhancements cannot be a substitute for the basic features required for compliance with this Recommendation. + +The format of the 'vndpar' attribute line is as follows: + +``` +a=vndpar: +[] +``` + +The , a decimal, indicates the format of the following field. The following values are defined: + +| Integer representation | Vendor ID format | +|------------------------|--------------------------------| +| 1 | [ITU-T T.35] | +| 2 | IANA Private enterprise number | + +The may be represented in hex or in decimal format. If represented in hex, it has a '0x' prefix. Generally, if the vendor ID format is ITU-T T.35, the hexadecimal format is preferred. If it is the IANA private enterprise number (), the decimal format is preferred. + +When the vendor ID format is ITU-T T.35, the vendor ID consists of a country code followed by a vendor code. The country code consists of four octets and the vendor ID consists of two octets. If the representation of the vendor ID is hexadecimal, leading zeros in the country code may be omitted, while leading zeros in the vendor code may not be omitted. + +When the is the vendor's private enterprise number, leading zeros may be omitted. + +The is a decimal integer between 0-255. If used, values in the range 1-255 are uniquely mapped, via the 'vndpar' attribute, to the combination of the vendor specified in the and the proprietary capabilities indicated by . This mapping, which exists for the duration of a session, does not persist across sessions. Further, each side may choose this integer independently of the other end. Due to the compactness of this index, a gateway or endpoint may use it in a number of places. A value of 0 is a null value. When present, it is equivalent to omitting the . A null value of the is not associated with any vendor ID. + +It shall be possible for an endpoint or gateway to declare multiple (1-255) 'vndpar' attribute lines in an SDP session description. Each of these lines may indicate a different vendor. In addition, multiple 'vndpar' lines may indicate the same vendor. When multiple 'vndpar' lines are declared in an SDP session descriptor, each value of must either be unique within all 'vndpar' lines in the session descriptor or null (0). If non-null, the may serve as a dynamically assigned feature identifier for the vendor. + +Inclusion of the parameter is optional. When included, this is a vendor-defined octet string consisting of one or more octets. Since it consists of an integer number of octets, it is represented by an even number of hex characters. No '0x' prefix is needed. No size limitation is specified since SDP parsers can ignore another vendor's string without checking its length. A vendor is permitted to add additional structure to the field such that features are identified by their position in this field. A vendor may also elect to add explicit + +feature identification within the `` field. When present, these supplement the ``. + +Note that the vendor is not precluded from using the `` field to communicate parameters that are not related to ITU-T V.152. + +## 7.2 Use of VBD in ITU-T H.323 systems + +ITU-T H.323 systems support ITU-T V.152 through the use of the `vBDCapability` capability defined in [ITU-T H.245]. This capability, which is a type of `AudioCapability`, is used during capability exchange and in the open logical channel (OLC) signalling to indicate support for VBD channels and to signal the opening of those channels. Since VBD media flows are generally switched within a single RTP session with normal voice audio and other audio-related media (e.g., [IETF RFC 4733]), OLC proposals and terminal capability set messages generally utilize the multiple payload stream (MPS) constructs in [ITU-T H.245]. + +### 7.2.1 Fast connect procedures + +ITU-T H.323 systems may offer one or more logical channel proposals in the SETUP message transmitted to the called party. The ITU-T H.323 device orders those logical channel proposals in order of preference. This allows an endpoint to indicate its preferred mode of operation and allows the called device to understand what is preferred, but to also accept any alternative modes offered by the calling device. + +If the calling device prefers to use VBD for the transport of all voice-band data, including facsimile, text, and modem signalling, the first proposal in the OLC would consist of a non-VBD audio codec and a VBD codec. If the calling endpoint also supports ITU-T T.38 relay over RTP, for example, it might offer as a second proposal a non-VBD audio codec, a VBD codec, and ITU-T T.38. In this way, the called device knows that the calling device prefers to use VBD for all voice-band data, but is also willing to do ITU-T T.38 relay over RTP in the case that the called device has this preference. As with normal Fast Connect procedures, the called device is free to accept any of the alternative proposals or refuse all of them and utilize normal ITU-T H.245 signalling to open logical channels. + +Generally, ITU-T H.323 devices would also signal as additional OLC proposals, ones that contain different audio codecs in combination with VBD codecs. Further, devices would also signal alternatives that offered only a non-VBD codec as the choice for media, in the case that the called device does not support this Recommendation. The choice of OLC proposals, the order of proposals, and the selection is a matter of implementation. + +ITU-T H.323 devices compliant with this Recommendation may also utilize Extended Fast Connect, which allows devices to renegotiate media streams and to make counter-proposals to those OLCs offered by the remote endpoint. Refer to [b-ITU-T H.460.6] for the procedures related to Extended Fast Connect. + +By no means does this Recommendation override the rules defined in [ITU-T H.323] related to Fast Connect procedures or the rules defined in [b-ITU-T H.460.6] for Extended Fast Connect. + +### 7.2.2 Exchanging VBD capabilities + +Devices specify support for VBD by including capabilities of the type `vBDCapability` in the ITU-T H.245 `TerminalCapabilitySet` message. As with other types of media, these capabilities may be grouped into capability descriptors to signal sets of simultaneous capabilities. Further, since VBD is generally one type of audio that is switched within the same RTP session as other media, `vBDCapability` capabilities are generally only defined as part of a multiple payload stream. However, since a device may wish to open a VBD stream that does nothing more than transmit media as VBD, capabilities may be defined and used outside of an MPS. + +### 7.2.3 ITU-T H.245 logical channel signalling procedures + +Once ITU-T H.323 devices have exchanged capabilities, they may open logical channels by transmitting open logical channel messages. The procedures for logical channel signalling are defined in [ITU-T H.323] and no additional procedures are defined in this Recommendation. + +Since ITU-T H.323 devices operate asynchronously, it is possible that one device may transmit an OLC message offering one set of capabilities, while the peer device transmits an OLC with an incompatible set of capabilities. For example, one device may propose an OLC that suggests the use of {G.729, VBD/G.711, T.38} while the peer device sends an OLC which suggests the use of {G.723.1, VBD/G.726}. Of course, both messages should be independently legal based on the exchanged capabilities. While [ITU-T H.323] permits devices to use different audio codecs in each direction, it may not be preferred. In this case, the fact that one side proposes to use T.38 over RTP and the other side does not is a problem. In all such cases, [ITU-T H.323] specifies that the master shall resolve such conflicts by rejecting the OLC with a reason of **masterSlaveConflict** or other appropriate reason. Devices should not fail as a result, but should converge to a common mode. + +Devices should utilize the request mode message in [ITU-T H.245] in order to suggest a compatible mode of operation. Either the master or the slave device may transmit a request mode message. Note, however, that the request may be rejected. Ultimately, the slave device may have no choice, except to use the preferred mode of the master. Even so, the master should honour requests from the slave device when possible. + +As an example to illustrate the opening of a media channel in accordance with this Recommendation, consider an OLC that has an ITU-T G.729 voice stream, an ITU-T G.711 A-law VBD stream that is protected with redundancy encoding, an [IETF RFC 4733] stream, and an ITU-T T.38 over RTP stream. The **OpenLogicalChannel** would essentially have a composition similar to what is shown here: + +``` +{ + forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1, + forwardLogicalChannelParameters { + dataType : multiplePayloadStream { + element { + dataType : audioData : g729 2 + }, + element { + dataType : redundancyEncoding { + primary { + dataType : audioData : vbd : g711Alaw64k 160 + }, + secondary { + { + dataType : audioData : vbd + } + : g711Alaw64k 160, + } + }, + payloadType 101 -- The PT for the RFC 2198 packet + }, + element { + dataType : audioData : audioTelephonyEvent { + audioTelephoneEvent : "0-15,32,33" + }, + payloadType 102 + }, + element { + dataType : audioData : genericDataCapability { + capabilityIdentifier : standard { + itu-t(0) recommendation(0) t(20) 38 + } + } + } + } + } +} +``` + +``` + + h245-audio-capability(0) + }, + nonCollapsing { + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 0, + parameterValue : booleanArray : 0 + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 1, + parameterValue : unsignedMin : 0 + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 2, + parameterValue : genericParameter + { + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 1, + parameterValue : logical + } + } + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 3, + parameterValue : unsigned32Max : 200 + }, + { + parameterIdentifier : standard : 4, + parameterValue : unsigned32Max : 72 + }, + }, +}, +payloadType 103 +} +}, +} +}, +multiplexParameters : h2250LogicalChannelParameters { + sessionID 1 +} +} + +``` + +## 7.3 Mid-call negotiation using session description protocol + +There might be the need for mid-call ITU-T V.152 negotiations, if ITU-T V.152 was not negotiated during the call establishment phase and if VBD stimuli were detected in a "mid-call phase". + +### 7.3.1 Possible use cases + +Example use cases: + +- 1) A call is started with negotiated audio VoIP only (neither ITU-T V.152 VBDoIP nor any packet relay mechanism like ITU-T T.38 FoIP was indicated and negotiated); +- 2) There might be mid-call VBD stimuli detected. +NOTE – The VBD stimuli detection logic in VoIP gateways may be always enabled, independent of the call-individual negotiation; +- 3) Any mid-call VBD stimuli detection shall trigger a capability renegotiation (e.g., via SIP re-INVITE); +- 4) Preferred media configuration may be ITU-T T.38 FoIP (thus, SDP Offer in SIP re-INVITE only contains ITU-T T.38 and no other alternative); + +- 5) However, if ITU-T T.38 fails, then ITU-T V.152 VBD over IP may be negotiated in a subsequent SDP Offer/Answer cycle. + +### **7.3.2 SIP/SDP mid-call negotiations** + +The possibility of the above-mentioned mid-call scenarios should be superseded by the application of Revised SDP Offer/Answer during the call establishment phase. See the advantages listed in clause 7.3.2.2. + +#### **7.3.2.1 SIP/SDP mid-call negotiations using Legacy SDP Offer/Answer** + +Step 4 in clause 7.3.1 implies at least one negotiation cycle. + +Step 5 in clause 7.3.1 implies at least one further negotiation cycle. + +#### **7.3.2.2 SIP/SDP mid-call negotiations using Revised SDP Offer/Answer** + +The problem of possible mid-call negotiations may be simply addressed by Revised SDP Offer/Answer, because: + +- supported media and transport capabilities (here: ITU-T T.38, ITU-T V.152) may be already checked out during the call establishment phase; +- preferences and alternatives may be indicated and agreed already during the call establishment phase (here: ITU-T T.38 would fail, ITU-T V.152 would be selected for VBD); +- concept of latent configuration allows to identify a possible, later (i.e., "mid-call") media configuration (here: start with audio, but later VBD stimuli detection will lead to an operational mode change). + +Consequently, a possible mid-call change shall be already clarified during the call establishment phase when both gateway entities support Revised SDP Offer/Answer. This obsoletes any SIP signalling (see steps 3 to 5 in clause 7.3.1) due to the autonomous state transitioning capability of ITU-T V.152 gateways. + +# **8 The use of IETF RFC 4733 modem/facsimile/text telephone events** + +IETF RFC 4733 telephone-events ANS (32), /ANS (33), ANSam (34) and /ANSam (35) can optionally be used as an alternative method for the transport of these signals in audio or VBD packets. If these events are declared by a media gateway, the remote media gateway may use [IETF RFC 4733] to transmit these signals. If both media gateways indicate the support of IETF RFC 4733 telephone-events ANS (32), /ANS (33), ANSam (34) and /ANSam (35), the gateway generating the events shall use [IETF RFC 4733] to transmit these signals. In either case, when [IETF RFC 4733] is used for transporting these signals, the gateways shall suppress the transport of these signals in audio or VBD packets. The amount of in-band signal leakage into the IP network using audio encoding for ANS, ANSam, /ANS, and /ANSam signals shall be less than 50 ms. + +IETF RFC 4733 telephone-events ANS (32), /ANS (33), ANSam (34) and /ANSam (35) could be used by the media gateways for the tone disabling ([ITU-T G.168]) of the echo canceller function if provided and enabled in the media gateway and shall be used for the generation of the appropriate signal on the TDM interface. If either end does not indicate this support, then the media gateways shall detect the 2100 Hz tone with phase reversals signal for echo canceller tone disabling on their incoming VBD packet stream. + +# 9 VBD stimuli + +This clause lists the stimuli that should be detected, per type of application, by a VBD gateway to initiate a transition to the VBD mode of operation, as described in clause 10. + +The list of stimuli below is not exhaustive and there may be other tones that can be used to initiate a transition to VBD for the listed applications: + +- *For facsimile applications:* + - CED as per [ITU-T T.30]; + - ANSam as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - Preamble as per clause 5.3.1 of [ITU-T T.30]; + - CNG as per [ITU-T T.30]. +- *For modem applications:* + - ANS as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - ANSam as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - 2225 Hz answer tone as per Appendix VI of [ITU-T V.150.1]; + - Unscrambled binary ones signal as per [b-ITU-T V.22]; + - CI signals that precede ANSam, as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - Initiating Segment 1 dual tones (1375 Hz and 2002 Hz) as per [b-ITU-T V.8bis]. +- *For text telephony applications:* + - ANS as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - ANSam as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - Text telephone signals as defined by clause 5.1.1 of [ITU-T V.18]; + - DTMF signals only if [IETF RFC 4733] telephone-events are not supported; + - CI signals that precede ANSam, as per [ITU-T V.8]; + - Calling tone (CT) signals that precede ANS, as per [b-ITU-T V.25]; + - Initiating Segment 1 dual tones (1375 Hz and 2002 Hz) as per [b-ITU-T V.8bis]. + +In addition to the above list, if any other unrecognized tonal non-voice signal is detected, this may be used to transition into VBD mode. + +VBD gateways should keep signal leakage to a minimum to prevent erroneous behaviour of end terminals. + +# 10 Procedures for transitioning between audio mode and VBD mode + +This clause describes the transitioning mechanism for an implementation that only supports VBD as per this Recommendation and voice, but does not support any relay mechanisms such as ITU-T T.38 or ITU-T V.150.1, nor VBD as per [ITU-T V.150.1]. + +The mechanism described in this clause shall be the default mandatory mechanism used by ITU-T V.152-compliant gateways if no other mechanisms have been successfully negotiated between the gateways, otherwise the mutually negotiated mechanism (such as those described in clause 11) shall be used in preference to this method. + +## 10.1 Procedures for state transitioning + +### 10.1.1 Audio-to-VBD transition + +The transition from audio mode to VBD mode is performed when the VBD detectors classify an input signal as VBD. + +Detection of the stimuli described in clause 9 shall be carried out at least in the direction from the GSTN to the IP network; however, detection in the direction from the IP network to the GSTN network is not precluded. The bidirectional VBD stimuli detection capability of a VBD gateway improves the probability of correct and timely gateway local state transition, which offers a more robust VBD service and state transition. + +On detection of any of the stimuli described in clause 9, if the corresponding IETF RFC 4733 telephone-event has not been mutually negotiated, a ITU-T V.152 implementation must transmit them as in-band VBD packets. + +If the ITU-T V.8 CI and the ITU-T V.8*bis* signals are transmitted in-band rather than as IETF RFC 4733 events, a shift to VBD must not lose any part of the signals. The choice of using in-band indication or IETF RFC 4733 for indicating these signals is dependent upon capability declaration, whether a VBD channel is available, and the preference of the transmitter. + +When in the VBD media state, a media gateway may use [IETF RFC 4733] in lieu of voice-band transmission to communicate to the remote gateway any of the voice-band data stimuli indicated in clause 9. + +The use of [IETF RFC 4733] in this case is contingent on the capabilities declared by the remote gateway. + +When in the VBD media state, the unscrambled binary ones signal is communicated in-band. There is no [IETF RFC 4733] support for this signal. + +When in the VBD media state, the text telephone signals are communicated in-band. The media gateway shall not lose any characters at the onset of in-band VBD transmission. + +The gateway shall suppress a voice-band data stimulus from the bearer path if it intends to convey the stimulus as an IETF RFC 4733 telephone event. This shall be done immediately on detection of the stimulus. A media gateway knows, prior to the detection of a voice-band data stimulus, whether it will transmit the stimulus in-band or via an IETF RFC 4733 telephone event. This knowledge is based on the remote gateway's capabilities (whether it can receive an IETF RFC 4733 encoding of that stimulus) and the local gateway's own choice (since it may use in-band transmission regardless of the remote gateway's capability declaration). + +Once VBD has been mutually negotiated by the two gateways, using the procedures described in clause 7, a gateway that complies with this Recommendation shall be able to receive and appropriately decode, from the IP network, RTP packets with any of the supported negotiated payload types for a particular call. Hence, an ITU-T V.152 implementation shall transition from voice to VBD on receipt of an RTP packet that has the negotiated VBD payload type. + +Additionally, gateways may optimize operation by doing one of the following: + +- Loading both the audio and VBD codecs to streamline quick, on-the-fly transitions between talkspurts and textspurts. +- Staying in the VBD mode across talkspurts and textspurts. + +Thus, on detection, in the direction from the GSTN to IP network of the appropriate VBD signals, a VBD gateway shall transition to VBD and transmit as soon as possible RTP packets with the corresponding negotiated VBD payload type. Reception of an RTP packet that has the pre-negotiated VBD payload type at the remote end shall cause a VBD gateway to transition to VBD mode, but only if, prior to receiving the VBD RTP packet, it received RTP packets that correspond to the state it was previously in (e.g., voice packets). The reason for the latter rule is explained below: + +Consider two VBD gateways, termed A and B, connected via an IP network and each having a GSTN network on their other sides. There will be a period during a call when both VBD gateways are in VBD mode. Gateway A transitions into audio mode due to detection of voice signals in the direction from the GSTN to the IP network, which will cause it to transition into voice and transmit voice RTP packets. While the first transmitted voice RTP packet is traversing the IP network, the remote end (gateway B) is still transmitting VBD RTP packets, because it has not detected anything on its GSTN side, nor has it yet received the voice RTP packets. To avoid gateway A from transitioning erroneously back into VBD mode, it must not transition back to VBD until it has first received (the pre-negotiated) voice RTP packets, which it should expect to receive due to it (i.e., gateway A) transitioning into voice. + +NOTE – An implementation shall be able to handle out-of-order RTP packets (e.g., a voice packet followed by a VBD packet that was actually sent before the voice packet). + +### **10.1.2 VBD-to-audio transition** + +Transition from VBD to voice may be carried out by detection: + +- In the direction from the GSTN to IP network of any of the following stimuli: + - end of modem or facsimile signals; + - voice signals; + - detection in both directions, GSTN to IP and IP to GSTN, of silence. With the following caveats: + - For text telephones, the appropriate detection of silence must be considered because text telephone conversations may have long periods of silence. + - For the case of facsimile calls, the silence period should be greater than the T2 timer defined in [ITU-T T.30]. + - MGC signalling or other out-of-band signalling methods. +- In the direction from IP to GSTN network due to receipt of RTP packets that have non-VBD payload types, only after the first VBD RTP packet has been received. This will avoid the situation of an incorrect transition into audio mode when it has transitioned to VBD mode on detection of VBD signals on its TDM side and is still receiving voice RTP packets (because the remote end has not yet transitioned, based on reception of the VBD RTP packets). + +## 10.2 State machine – Overview + +The above described transition criteria are also summarized in Figure 9. + +![Figure 9 – Voice-VBD transitioning state diagram. A state machine diagram with two states: AUDIO mode and VBD mode. Transitions are as follows: AUDIO to VBD: 'Detection VBD signals'; VBD to AUDIO: 'VBD RTP packet and previous RTP packets were voice RTP packets'; AUDIO to VBD: 'Bidirectional silence'; VBD to AUDIO: 'TDM voice or TDM end-of-modem signal'; AUDIO to VBD: 'Voice RTP packets and previous RTP packets were VBD RTP packets'; VBD to AUDIO: 'MGC signalling or other out-of-band signalling'. Reference: V.152(10)_F9.](60ffbad6c0fb7371a57fe8f267d2d141_img.jpg) + +``` +graph LR; + AUDIO((AUDIO mode)) -- "Detection VBD signals" --> VBD((VBD mode)); + VBD -- "VBD RTP packet and previous RTP packets were voice RTP packets" --> AUDIO; + AUDIO -- "Bidirectional silence" --> VBD; + VBD -- "TDM voice or TDM end-of-modem signal" --> AUDIO; + AUDIO -- "Voice RTP packets and previous RTP packets were VBD RTP packets" --> VBD; + VBD -- "MGC signalling or other out-of-band signalling" --> AUDIO; +``` + +Figure 9 – Voice-VBD transitioning state diagram. A state machine diagram with two states: AUDIO mode and VBD mode. Transitions are as follows: AUDIO to VBD: 'Detection VBD signals'; VBD to AUDIO: 'VBD RTP packet and previous RTP packets were voice RTP packets'; AUDIO to VBD: 'Bidirectional silence'; VBD to AUDIO: 'TDM voice or TDM end-of-modem signal'; AUDIO to VBD: 'Voice RTP packets and previous RTP packets were VBD RTP packets'; VBD to AUDIO: 'MGC signalling or other out-of-band signalling'. Reference: V.152(10)\_F9. + +Figure 9 – Voice-VBD transitioning state diagram + +## 10.3 Enforced state transition by call/session control + +The call/session control may enforce state transitioning based on detected VBD stimuli in the bearer-path, which are reported to the call control, or the media capability negotiation during call establishment or modification, or other policies (like, e.g., preferred media formats of a service provider). This capability is indicated by the arrow "*MGC signalling or ...*" in Figure 9. + +Procedures for such transitioning behaviour would be dependent on the specific applied signalling protocols (e.g., ITU-T H.323, SIP, ITU-T H.248, etc.), which are therefore beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +# 11 Optional procedures for indicating to a remote end transition into VBD using state signalling events + +This clause describes the procedures that an ITU-T V.152 implementation must use when using the state signalling event protocol as defined in Annexes C, E and F of [ITU-T V.150.1]. + +Note that the use of SSE is optional for ITU-T V.152 implementation and subject to negotiation with the remote gateway. When one or both of the two gateways does not support SSE operation, then transitions to and from the VBD mode shall be governed by the procedures defined in clause 10. + +## 11.1 Declaration of SSEs + +The SSE capability shall be signalled as defined in clause F.6 of [ITU-T V.150.1]. The minimum set of state signalling events that shall be supported for VBD operation are events 0 through 3 which are basic to the SSE protocol. The null SSE event (0) shall never be sent and should be ignored if received. + +## 11.2 Transition to the VBD mode for ITU-T V.150.1 gateways + +When both gateways support [ITU-T V.150.1], then transitions to and from the VBD mode is governed by ITU-T V.150.1 procedures. These transitions are synchronized via the SSE protocol. + +## 11.3 Transition to the VBD mode for non- ITU-T V.150 cases + +When one or both of the two gateways does not support ITU-T V.150.1 operation, then transitions to and from the VBD mode shall be governed by the procedures in this clause. An attempt shall be made to make these procedures isomorphic to ITU-T V.150.1 procedures so that media gateways do not incur the burden of supporting and testing multiple VBD switching mechanisms. + +An ITU-T V.152-compliant media gateway that has successfully negotiated support of SSE media gateway shall respond to a voice-band data stimulus by immediately transitioning the connection to the VBD media state and issuing an SSE indicating this state (see clause C.5.2 of [ITU-T V.150.1]). As with all other media state transitions, this is contingent on resource availability. On making this transition locally, the stimulus-detecting media gateway may start sending VBD packets immediately. + +On receiving an SSE indicating the VBD media state (SSE:VBD), a media gateway shall immediately transition the connection to the VBD media state if it has the resources to do so. Before making this transition, it may ignore any in-band VBD packets it receives (see clause 20.4 of [ITU-T V.150.1]). + +The transition to a VBD media state in response to detecting a voice-band data stimulus (such as an answer tone variant) is illustrated in Figure 10. In this example, the on-ramp (call-originating) gateway G1 and the off-ramp (call-terminating) gateway G2 support VBD operation. + +On detecting a voice-band data stimulus, gateway G2 determines whether it has the resources to transition the session to the VBD media state. If it does, then it immediately makes the transition and sends SSE:VBD (event code 2) to gateway G1. While in the VBD media state, it uses an RTP payload type marked for VBD treatment. + +On receiving SSE:VBD, gateway G1 determines whether it has the resources to transition the session to the VBD media state. If it does, then it immediately makes the transition and sends an SSE:VBD back to gateway G2, confirming that its media state has changed to VBD. If it does not, then it sends an SSE:audio (event code 1) on receiving a SSE:VBD from G2. + +![Sequence diagram illustrating the initiation of VBD operation in response to VBD stimulus detection between On-ramp gateway (G1) and Off-ramp gateway (G2).](a93de4c3f80bd4a972ab65510b09b68d_img.jpg) + +``` +sequenceDiagram + participant G1 as On-ramp gateway (G1) + participant G2 as Off-ramp gateway (G2) + Note over G1: G1 in initial audio mode + Note over G2: G2 in initial audio mode + Note over G2: VBD stimulus detected + Note over G2: Transition to VBD mode + G2->>G1: SSE: VBD + Note over G1: Transition to VBD mode + G1->>G2: SSE: VBD +``` + +The diagram shows the interaction between two gateways, G1 (On-ramp) and G2 (Off-ramp). G1 starts in 'initial audio mode'. G2 starts in 'initial audio mode', detects a 'VBD stimulus', and transitions to 'VBD mode'. G2 then sends an 'SSE: VBD' message to G1. Upon receiving this message, G1 transitions to 'VBD mode' and sends an 'SSE: VBD' message back to G2. The diagram is labeled V.152(10)\_F10. + +Sequence diagram illustrating the initiation of VBD operation in response to VBD stimulus detection between On-ramp gateway (G1) and Off-ramp gateway (G2). + +**Figure 10 – Initiation of VBD operation in response to VBD stimulus detection** + +When sending SSE:VBD, gateways G1 and G2 may use suitable reason information codes (RICs) defined in [ITU-T V.150.1]. An example is the RIC indicating an answer tone. A null code, which conveys no information, may also be used. The SSE:VBD from G1 may indicate a p' state transition as the reason information code. Since p' is defined as a gateway's view of the other gateway's protocol state, this indicates that this SSE from G1 is a response to a received SSE. + +Distinctions based on RIC codes (ITU-T V.8 versus non- ITU-T V.8, text vs. non-text) may be used to optimize play-out buffer settings and FEC levels for different applications of VBD. Additionally, when the RIC indicates text, gateways may optimize operation by doing one of the following: + +- Loading both the audio and VBD codecs to streamline quick, on-the-fly transitions between talkspurts and textspurts. +- Staying in the VBD mode across talkspurts and textspurts. + +## **11.4 Transition from the VBD media mode** + +On detecting a termination of data transmission, media gateways shall locally transition the connection to the audio mode and issue an SSE:audio (Initial audio SSE, event code 1) to the remote gateway. If it receives an SSE:audio, it shall change the media state to initial audio and respond back with an SSE:audio. + +The criteria for determining the termination of data transmission are application-specific and are not defined here. Examples of such criteria are the detection of voice or of pre-determined intervals of silence. A transition to the modem, fax or text media states is not a termination of data transmission. + +By declaring support of the SSE protocol, gateways implicitly declare support for events 1-3 which are basic to the protocol. In order to be used, support for other SSEs such as SSE:FR (Facsimile relay SSE, event code 4) and SSE:TR (Text relay SSE, event code 5) shall be explicitly declared. + +Transitions from the VBD media state to the MR (modem relay), FR (facsimile relay) and TR (text relay) states are permitted. These media state transitions are contingent on: + +- 1) Declaration of the applicable capabilities at call establishment. +- 2) Availability of resources at the time of the state transition. + +In the modem relay case, these are synchronized using SSE:MR (Modem relay SSE, event code 3) per [ITU-T V.150.1]. + +SSE:TR (Text relay SSE, event code 5) is recommended to synchronize media shifts from VBD to the text relay mode, and vice versa. For example, when ITU-T V.21 signals are followed by Annex A of [ITU-T V.18] signals in end-to-end ITU-T V.18 automodring, there may be a shift to VBD based on the ANS preceding [ITU-T V.21], and possibly another shift to TR if the gateway does not support VBD for Annex A of [ITU-T V.18]. + +For autonomous media shifts from VBD to facsimile relay, two cases arise from [ITU-T T.38]: + +- 1) For gateways that comply with [ITU-T V.150.1] and Annex F of [ITU-T T.38], SSE:FR is used. Both single-port and multi-port operation is supported. +- 2) For all other gateways, port activity monitoring is used. Note that single-port operation for audio RTP and ITU-T T.38 udptl packets is not supported; however, single-port operation may be used if audio RTP and the optional ITU-T T.38 RTP procedure are being used. + +Since facsimile switchovers are tolerant in terms of signal timing, external signalling can be used in lieu of the autonomous VBD-to-FR media shifts described in the last paragraph. Examples of external signalling are SIP re-invites, ITU-T H.245 RequestMode/CLC/OLC and ITU-T H.248.1 context modification. End-to-end timing issues that often jeopardize the use of external signalling with modem traffic do not exist for facsimile traffic. + +For a session that is in the VBD media state, a gateway may reject SSE:MR, SSE:FR or SSE:TR with an SSE:VBD or SSE:audio. If used, SSE:audio causes a transitioning of the session to an audio mode. + +The SSE reason identifier codes for VBD mode are defined in Table 12 of [ITU-T V.150.1]. + +![Sequence diagram for ITU-T V.18 text telephone using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). T1 sends 'V8-CM = V.18' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 37)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 37)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. T2 sends 'ANSam' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from T1 to T2. Reference: V.152(10)_F11](38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for ITU-T V.18 text telephone using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: T1, G1, G2, and T2. T1 and T2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). T1 sends 'V8-CM = V.18' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 37)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 37)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. T2 sends 'ANSam' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from T1 to T2. Reference: V.152(10)\_F11 + +**Figure 11 – ITU-T V.18 text telephone using VBD** + +![Sequence diagram for ITU-T V.34 modem using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: M1, G1, G2, and M2. M1 and M2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). M1 sends 'ANSam' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 22)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 22)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. M2 sends 'ANSam' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from M1 to M2. Reference: V.152(10)_F12](ec3647789b5c38fb686f2a0833324e79_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for ITU-T V.34 modem using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: M1, G1, G2, and M2. M1 and M2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). M1 sends 'ANSam' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 22)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 22)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. M2 sends 'ANSam' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from M1 to M2. Reference: V.152(10)\_F12 + +**Figure 12 – ITU-T V.34 modem using VBD** + +![Sequence diagram for Group 3 facsimile (without CNG/CED tones) using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: F1, G1, G2, and F2. F1 and F2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). F1 sends 'V.21(H) Flags' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 13)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 13)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. F2 sends 'V.21 (H) Flags' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from F1 to F2. Reference: V.152(10)_F13](7fe5741e83bc9702d1b1d7585ddf66bd_img.jpg) + +Sequence diagram for Group 3 facsimile (without CNG/CED tones) using VBD. The diagram shows four lifelines: F1, G1, G2, and F2. F1 and F2 are endpoints (A), while G1 and G2 are gateways (A, T, V). F1 sends 'V.21(H) Flags' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:TR(RC = 13)' to G2. G2 sends 'SSE:VBD(RC = 13)' to G1. G1 sends 'SSE:VBD(ack)' to G2. F2 sends 'V.21 (H) Flags' to G2. A long 'VBD' arrow spans from F1 to F2. Reference: V.152(10)\_F13 + +**Figure 13 – Group 3 facsimile (without CNG/CED tones) using VBD** + +## **11.5 Security – Optional** + +When the VBD mode is used to transport data payloads, it lends itself easily to secure, encrypted operation based on SRTP (Secure RTP). Support of security features is not required by ITU-T V.152 compliant implementations and is negotiated at call establishment. + +Based on declarations at the time of session establishment, it is possible to encrypt some RTP payload types (e.g., voice, VBD and IETF RFC 4733 events), while passing other RTP payload types (e.g., SSEs) unencrypted. Such selective encryption will allow fast response times to SSEs, without compromising the security of media sourced by the end-user. When one end proposes encrypted operation for a set of payload formats, and the other end does not support encryption, the preferred outcome is a rejection of the proposal and termination of the connection attempt. At this point, either the on-ramp or off-ramp media gateway or media gateway controller can counter-propose a non-encrypted connection through the call signalling protocol(s) in use. + +# **Annex A** + +## **Vendor-defined messages** + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +Vendor-specific messages may be supported within ITU-T V.152, subject to negotiation with the remote end. In general, an ITU-T V.152 implementation may support up to 255 vendor identifiers (vendor-ID) for a given call. Each vendor-ID may be unique or specific and tied to either a single or multiple sets of attributes. A unique vendor-Tag may also be assigned to each set of attributes associated with a vendor-ID to allow simpler use within ITU-T V.152. + +Usually the vendor-ID is provided during the external signalling used during the call set-up (i.e., ITU-T H.245, ITU-T H.248 or SDP, etc.). The format used in signalling schemes may be compliant to either [ITU-T T.35] or the IANA private enterprise number. The choice is up to the vendor. + +When the vendor-ID format is ITU-T T.35, the vendor-ID consists of a country code followed by a vendor code. The country code consists of four octets and the vendor-ID consists of two octets. If the representation of the vendor-ID is hexadecimal, leading zeros in the country code may be omitted, while leading zeros in the vendor code may not be omitted. + +When the vendor-ID is the vendor's IANA private enterprise number, leading zeros may be omitted. + +The vendor-Tag is a decimal integer with a value between 0 and 255. If used, values in the range of 1 to 255 are uniquely mapped to the combination of vendor-ID and vendor-specific information. The choice of this integer made by a gateway is independent of the choice made by its peer gateway. Due to the compactness of this index, a gateway or endpoint may use it in a number of places to simplify the messaging. A value of zero for the vendor-Tag is a null value. When present, it is equivalent to omitting the vendor-Tag. A null value of the vendor-Tag is not associated with any vendor-ID. If non-null, the vendor-Tag may serve as a dynamically assigned vendor-specific identifier. + +The vendor-specific information is an octet string consisting of one or more octets as defined by the vendor. Since it consists of an integer number of octets, it is represented by an even number of hex characters. No "0x" prefix is needed. Limitation on size is context specific. Details where size is limited will be indicated appropriately. + +# Annex B + +## Use of data signal detection and silence insertion in voiceband data + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +### B.1 Introduction + +Data signal detector (DSD) and silence insertion in VBD mode is a technique that reduces the transmission bandwidth over IP networks by inserting silence indicator descriptors during the silence periods of a voiceband data modem connection. This is especially efficient for half-duplex data transmissions. This annex provides guidance on DSD and silence insertion for gateways compliant to this Recommendation. + +## B.2 Guideline for the use of DSD + +When in the VBD state, a data signal detector monitors and analyses the voiceband analogue input signals. The data signal detector categorizes the analysed signal to be either a correct voiceband modem signal or silence. The means of determining this signal categorization is implementation specific and this Recommendation does not describe any particular method in detail. However, an example is: once in the VBD state, a gateway may monitor the signal energy level (this is the same signal as used for driving ITU-T V.24 Circuit 109) and use that for determining the presence of silence. In this instance, echo levels must be accounted for in the analysis process. + +Most modem procedures include a short silence between different training and data mode phases. These vary from $70 \pm 5$ ms for [ITU-T T.30] to $75 \pm 5$ ms for high speed duplex data modems. In these instances, it is important to maintain the fidelity of these short silence periods. A DSD detector shall use a silence validation time greater than 80 ms. + +Upon the qualified detection of silence, the gateway transmits a silence insertion description (SID) frame to inform the peer gateway of the beginning of the silence period. The SID frame format shall be that specified for use with the selected VBD codec. For example if ITU-T G.711 is the codec being used, then the SID format shall comply with Appendix II of [ITU-T G.711]. + +In the SID frame, the level field is set to zero and the N1~Nm fields are set to zero. Only an initial SID frame needs to be transmitted per silence period. + +The receiving gateway upon receiving a SID frame or packet shall play out the SID frame zero level data as silence. The level of the transmitted analogue silence shall be less than -55 dBm. The receiving gateway shall continue to play out silence until it receives a valid VBD data packet. + +To ensure that the signal can be detected at the receiver side, the maximum response time for a DSD detector to detect the silence to data transition should be less than 1.5 ms. The transmitting gateway shall detect the presence of a voiceband signal and transmit a valid VBD packet without delay. + +## B.3 Negotiation of the DSD capability with SDP + +Gateways shall mutually negotiate the capability of DSD. Clause 7.1 explains the detailed procedure for negotiation using SDP. The DSD negotiation shall comply with the procedures described in clause 7.1, and use two a-line attributes to indicate support of DSD capability. + +If VBD MGW supports DSD capability, the SDP attribute should indicate: + +``` +m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 18 98 99 +a=rtpmap:98 PCMA/8000 +a=gpmd:98 vbd=yes +a=rtpmap:99 CN/8000 +a=gpmd:99 dsd=yes +``` + +"a=gpmid:99 dsd=yes" indicates that the device supports the DSD capability; "a=rtpmap:99 CN/8000" shows that the device sends SID frame with payload type 99. If mutually negotiated, both gateways can use the DSD procedures described in this annex. + +If a VBD MGW does not support DSD capability, the SDP attribute should indicate: + +``` +m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 18 98 99 +a=rtpmap:98 PCMA/8000 +a=gpmid:98 vbd=yes +a=rtpmap:99 CN/8000 +a=gpmid:99 dsd=no +``` + +"a=gpmid:99 dsd=no" indicates that the device does not support or does not want to use DSD. + +To maintain compatibility with gateways using a previous version of this Recommendation that would not support DSD capability, the absence of the gpmid attribute for DSD is interpreted to be the same as "dsd=no" capability. + +### B.4 Negotiation of the DSD capability with [ITU-T H.245] + +Clause 7.2 explains the use of VBD in ITU-T H.323 systems. ITU-T H.323 systems support ITU-T V.152 through the use of the **VBDCapability** capability defined in [ITU-T H.245]. This capability, which is a type of **AudioCapability**, is used during capability exchange and in the open logical channel (OLC) signalling to indicate support for VBD channels and to signal the opening of those channels. An extension to the **VBDCapability** is needed to indicate the DSD capability. + +``` +VBDCapability ::=SEQUENCE +{ + type AudioCapability, -- shall not be "vbd" + dsd BOOLEAN + ... +} +``` + +If VBD MGW supports DSD capability, the dsd attribute should indicate "TRUE". If a VBD MGW does not support the DSD capability, the dsd attribute should indicate "FALSE". The absence of the dsd attribute for DSD is interpreted as no support for the DSD capability. + +# Annex C + +## Use of ITU-T V.21 preamble for echo canceller control in an ITU-T V.152 gateway + +(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.) + +For the scenario where an ITU-T V.34 facsimile terminal is being called by a standard G3 facsimile terminal, the procedures defined in [ITU-T T.30] stipulate that the connection proceeds as a standard G3 facsimile. Also, [ITU-T T.30] recommends that the ITU-T V.34 facsimile terminal should transmit an ITU-T V.8 answer tone with phase reversals, thereby tone disabling any gateway echo cancellers in the connection. In this situation, the gateway echo cancellers will be left in the disabled state when proceeding into ITU-T T.30 standard G3 modes. This has a direct impact upon the performance of standard G3 facsimile terminals as described in [ITU-T G.168] and [b-ITU-T G.161], which require that echo cancellers be in their initial cancelling state in order to provide the best conditions for a facsimile transmission. + +[ITU-T T.30] (2006) was updated to correct this situation and defines how the ITU-T T.30 procedures will allow for the re-enabling of echo cancellers to their initial cancelling state. However, this particular scenario remains an issue to be considered as there are many millions of facsimile terminals that do not support the 2006 version of [ITU-T T.30]. + +This annex describes a method that may be used to rectify this condition in gateways compliant to this Recommendation. This method consists in using the detected presence of the V.21High Channel HDLC encoded FLAG preamble as defined in [ITU-T T.30] to initiate a transition from the tone disabled state back to the initial cancelling state. Once the echo canceller has returned to its initial state, the standard G3 facsimile procedure will operate as intended. (See Figure C.1.) + +![Sequence diagram showing the fax procedure and echo canceller status after enabling by ITU-T V.21 preamble. The diagram involves four entities: Sending facsimile (standard G3), EC status in gateway A, EC status in gateway B, and Receiving facsimile (V.34).](c0c7f65c51c83fbe595b47326f6b089a_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the sequence of events and echo canceller (EC) status transitions during a fax call setup between a standard G3 sending terminal and a V.34 receiving terminal, passing through two gateways (A and B). + +**Entities:** + +- Sending facsimile (standard G3)** +- EC status in gateway A** +- EC status in gateway B** +- Receiving facsimile (V.34)** + +**Sequence of Events and States:** + +- Initial State:** Both Gateway A and Gateway B are in the *Initial cancelling state*. +- Voice mode:** CNG signal is sent from Sending facsimile to Receiving facsimile. +- Signal:** /ANSam is sent from Receiving facsimile to Sending facsimile. +- Transition:** G.168 EC may enter tone disabled state. +- Disabled State:** Both Gateway A and Gateway B enter the *Tone disabled state*. +- Signal:** V.21 preamble\DIS is sent from Receiving facsimile to Sending facsimile. +- Detection & Recovery:** + - Gateway A: Detects V.21 Preamble and returns to EC initial cancelling state. + - Gateway B: May detect packet side V.21 preamble and return EC to initial cancelling state. +- Final State:** Both gateways return to *Initial cancelling state*. +- Signal:** V.21 preamble\DIS is sent from Sending facsimile to Receiving facsimile. + +V.152(10)\_FC.1 + +Sequence diagram showing the fax procedure and echo canceller status after enabling by ITU-T V.21 preamble. The diagram involves four entities: Sending facsimile (standard G3), EC status in gateway A, EC status in gateway B, and Receiving facsimile (V.34). + +**Figure C.1 – Fax procedure and echo canceller status after enabling by ITU-T V.21 preamble** + +### **Gateway to echo canceller signalling** + +This procedure is only valid for media gateways compliant to this Recommendation. Note that in this application, echo cancellers may be embedded within the media gateway or be external to it. The signalling of the gateway to the echo canceller can be via proprietary means if it is an embedded type in the gateway, or by some standardized means if connected to an external echo canceller. The means definition of external echo canceller control is for further study. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T F.700] Recommendation ITU-T F.700 (2000), *Framework Recommendation for multimedia services*. +- [b-ITU-T G.161] Recommendation ITU-T G.161 (2004), *Interaction aspects of signal processing network equipment*. +- [b-ITU-T H.460.6] Recommendation ITU-T H.460.6 (2002), *Extended Fast Connect feature*. +- [b-ITU-T J.171] Recommendation ITU-T J.171 (2002), *IP-Cablecom Trunking Gateway Control Protocol (TGCP)*. +- [b-ITU-T V.8bis] Recommendation ITU-T V.8bis (2000), *Procedures for the identification and selection of common modes of operation between data circuit-terminating equipments (DCEs) and between data terminal equipments (DTEs) over the public switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits*. +- [b-ITU-T V.22] Recommendation ITU-T V.22 (1988), *1200 bits per second duplex modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits*. +- [b-ITU-T V.24] Recommendation ITU-T V.24 (2000), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between data terminal equipment (DTE) and data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE)*. +- [b-ITU-T V.25] Recommendation ITU-T V.25 (1996), *Automatic answering equipment and general procedures for automatic calling equipment on the general switched telephone network including procedures for disabling of echo control devices for both manually and automatically established calls*. +- [b-ITU-T V.150.0] Recommendation ITU-T V.150.0 (2003), *Modem-over-IP networks: Foundation*. +- [b-IETF RFC 2234] IETF RFC 2234 (1997), *Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF*. +- [b-IETF RFC 3711] IETF RFC 3711 (2004), *The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)*. +- [b-IETF RFC 5939] IETF RFC 5939 (2010), *SDP Capability Negotiation*. +- [b-IETF Draft MediaCapNeg] draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities, *SDP media capabilities Negotiation*. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.153-200912-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.153-200912-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33814c61beb7c74e74b77ac4a0a6983b215fda41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.153-200912-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,816 @@ + + +I n t e r n a t i o n a l   T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n   U n i o n + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.153 + +(12/2009) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interworking with other networks + +--- + +**Interworking between ITU-T T.38 and +ITU-T V.152 using IP peering for real-time +facsimile services** + +Recommendation ITU-T V.153 + +![ITU logo](84a1d09fb489061482111515543b60dc_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with a red lightning bolt striking it, and the text "ITU" in blue, with "International Telecommunication Union" in smaller blue text below it. + +ITU logo + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# **Recommendation ITU-T V.153** + +# **Interworking between ITU-T T.38 and ITU-T V.152 using IP peering for real-time facsimile services** + +## **Summary** + +Recommendation ITU-T V.153 defines service interworking between two IP domains, whereby one IP domain is using voiceband data over IP (VBDoIP) transport according to Recommendation ITU-T V.152 and the other IP domain is using facsimile relay over IP (FoIP) transport according to Recommendation ITU-T T.38. Two modes of operation are specified for the T.38-to-V.152 interworking function: native versus emulated interworking. + +The T.38-to-V.152 interworking technology is subject of the user plane and typically located in IP-to-IP gateway equipment, like border routers or border gateways. + +## **History** + +| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | +|---------|----------------|------------|-------------| +| 1.0 | ITU-T V.153 | 2009-12-14 | 16 | + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at . + +© ITU 2010 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 | +| | 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere..... | 2 | +| | 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 | +| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 3 | +| 5 | Conventions ..... | 4 | +| 6 | Overview ..... | 4 | +| 7 | Definition of the principal modes of operation..... | 5 | +| | 7.1 Emulation mode..... | 5 | +| | 7.2 Native mode..... | 6 | +| | 7.3 Methods for discrimination between native and emulation mode..... | 6 | +| 8 | Interworking function: Specific items for consideration..... | 7 | +| | 8.1 ITU-T T.30 procedures..... | 7 | +| | 8.2 Data rate management for ITU-T V.34 facsimile ..... | 7 | +| 9 | Capability negotiation/determination for V.152-to-T.38 interworking..... | 7 | +| | 9.1 General ..... | 7 | +| | 9.2 Negotiation using SDP ..... | 8 | +| 10 | Handling of stimuli between VBDoIP and FoIP ..... | 9 | +| 11 | Synchronization of state transitioning between VBDoIP and FoIP state machines..... | 10 | +| | Appendix I – Performance evaluation of both modes of operation ..... | 11 | +| | I.1 Gateway transfer delay ..... | 11 | +| | I.2 Gateway transfer delay variation..... | 11 | +| | I.3 Gateway information loss..... | 12 | +| | I.4 Dejitter buffer aspects..... | 12 | +| | I.5 Aspect of redundant packet transport ..... | 12 | +| | Appendix II – H.248 bearer establishment procedure examples ..... | 13 | +| | II.1 Introduction ..... | 13 | +| | II.2 MG state transitioning: MGC-strict controlled method versus MG autonomous transitioning ..... | 13 | +| | II.3 Example network model..... | 13 | +| | II.4 Example signalling ..... | 15 | +| | Bibliography..... | 23 | + + + +# Recommendation ITU-T V.153 + +# Interworking between ITU-T T.38 and ITU-T V.152 using IP peering for real-time facsimile services + +# 1 Scope + +[ITU-T V.152] describes the voiceband data (VBD) operation of voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) gateways, which may be abbreviated as VBDoIP. [ITU-T T.38] describes the facsimile packet relay operation of voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) gateways, which may be abbreviated as FoIP. Both these gateway models consider explicitly interworking between an IP-based packet-switched network on one side and a circuit-switched network on the other side. + +This Recommendation describes procedures for direct service interworking (according to the definition in clause 3.2 of [ITU-T Y.1251]) of two IP domains, whereby one IP domain uses V.152-based VBDoIP transport and the other IP domain uses T.38-based FoIP transport. + +The term voiceband data is an umbrella term for all kinds of teleservices that use a "data-oriented transport" in the frequency band of the narrow-band voice spectrum (which is a 3.1-kHz-band). The data-oriented transport is realized by modem protocols (the definition for modem can be found in clause 3.13 of [ITU-T V.152]), as defined, e.g., within the ITU-T V-series Recommendations. Teleservices may be categorized into three major applications areas: facsimile, text-based communication and general data services. The three VBD application areas may be summarized as (by using notation "application/transport"): + +- **Facsimile/modem:** Gateway technologies for PSTN-to-IP interworking, see, e.g., [ITU-T V.152] for pass-through mode and [ITU-T T.38] for packet relay mode. +- **Text/modem:** Gateway technologies for PSTN-to-IP interworking, see, e.g., [ITU-T V.152] for pass-through mode and [b-ITU-T V.151] for packet relay mode. +- **Data/modem:** Gateway technologies for PSTN-to-IP interworking, see, e.g., [ITU-T V.152] for pass-through mode and [b-ITU-T V.150.1] for packet relay mode. + +This Recommendation only considers facsimile/modem. + +# 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- [ITU-T H.245] Recommendation ITU-T H.245 (2008), *Control protocol for multimedia communication*. +- [ITU-T H.248.1] Recommendation ITU-T H.248.1 (2005), *Gateway Control Protocol: Version 3, including its Amendment 2* (2009). +- [ITU-T H.323] Recommendation ITU-T H.323 (2006), *Packet-based multimedia communications systems*. + +- [ITU-T Q.3303.2] Recommendation ITU-T Q.3303.2 (2007), *Resource control protocol No. 3 – Protocol at the interface between a Policy Decision Physical Entity (PD-PE) and a Policy Enforcement Physical Entity (PE-PE) (Rw interface): H.248 alternative.* +- [ITU-T T.30] Recommendation ITU-T T.30 (2005), *Procedures for document facsimile transmission in the general switched telephone network.* +- [ITU-T T.38] Recommendation ITU-T T.38 (2007), *Procedures for real-time Group 3 facsimile communication over IP networks.* +- [ITU-T V.152] Recommendation ITU-T V.152 (2005), *Procedures for supporting voice-band data over IP networks*, and its Corrigenda 1 (2005) and 2 (2006). +- [ITU-T Y.1251] Recommendation ITU-T Y.1251 (2002), *General architectural model for interworking.* +- [IETF RFC 2198] IETF RFC 2198 (1997), *RTP Payload for Redundant Audio Data.* +- [IETF RFC 2733] IETF RFC 2733 (1999), *An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction.* +- [IETF RFC 3261] IETF RFC 3261 (2002), *SIP: Session Initiation Protocol.* +- [IETF RFC 3550] IETF RFC 3550 (2003), *RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications.* +- [IETF RFC 3551] IETF RFC 3551 (2003), *RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control.* +- [IETF RFC 4566] IETF RFC 4566 (2006), *SDP: Session Description Protocol.* +- [IETF RFC 4733] IETF RFC 4733 (2006), *RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals.* + +# 3 Definitions + +## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere + +The terms defined in clause 3 of [ITU-T V.152] and clause 3 of [ITU-T T.38] are applicable, as far as relevant, in this Recommendation. In addition: + +**3.1.1 voiceband data** [b-ITU-T V.150.0]: The transport of modem signals over a voice channel of a packet network with the encoding appropriate for modem signals. + +## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.2.1 emulated VBDtoIP-to-FoIP mode:** This is an internal mode of operation of the VBDtoIP-to-FoIP gateway with an indirect interworking between both IP connection endpoints. This is done using a gateway that embeds internal TDM-based, 64-kbit/s bearer channels. The two (gateway local) IP connection endpoints do thus represent emulated ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 gateway functions. + +**3.2.2 facsimile packet relay mode ("fax relay" for short):** The transport of facsimile/modem data across an IP-based packet network using [ITU-T T.38]. + +**3.2.3 IP peering:** IP peering denotes the interconnection of two IP domains (at the network protocol layer). + +**3.2.4 native VBDolP-to-FoIP mode:** This is an internal mode of operation of the VBDolP-to-FoIP gateway with a direct interworking between both (gateway local) IP connection endpoints where no circuit-switched bearer technology is used internally in the gateway. + +**3.2.5 VBDolP-to-FoIP gateway:** A media gateway that is compliant with this Recommendation. + +**3.2.6 voiceband data mode** [adapted from ITU-T V.152]: VBDolP is the transport of voiceband data over a voice channel of an IP-based packet network with the encoding appropriate for modem signals as defined in [ITU-T V.152], clause 6. + +## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: + +| | | +|-------|-------------------------------------| +| B2BUA | (SIP) Back-to-Back User Agent | +| BICC | Bearer Independent Call Control | +| CSN | Circuit-Switched Network | +| DS0 | Digital Signal level 0 | +| FoIP | Facsimile-over-IP | +| FoTDM | Facsimile-over-TDM | +| G3FE | Group 3 Facsimile Equipment | +| GSTN | General Switched Telephone Network | +| IMS | IP Multimedia System | +| IP | Internet Protocol | +| IPDV | IP Packet Delay Variation | +| IPLR | IP Packet Loss Ratio | +| IPTD | IP Packet Transfer Delay | +| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network | +| IWF | Interworking Function | +| MG | Media Gateway | +| MGC | Media Gateway Controller | +| NGN | Next Generation Network | +| NTE | Network Telephone Event | +| O/A | (SDP) Offer/Answer | +| PE-PE | Policy Enforcement Physical Entity | +| PES | PSTN Emulation Subsystem | +| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network | +| PT | (RTP) Payload Type/Packet Type | +| RTCP | RTP Control Protocol | +| RTP | Real-time Transport Protocol | +| SDP | Session Description Protocol | +| SIP | Session Initiation Protocol | + +| | | +|----------|------------------------------------------| +| SLA | Service Level Agreement | +| (S)TDM | (Synchronous) Time Division Multiplexing | +| TPKT | Transport Protocol Data Unit Packet | +| UA | (SIP) User Agent | +| UDP | User Datagram Protocol | +| UDPTL | Facsimile UDP Transport Layer (protocol) | +| VBD | Voiceband Data | +| VBDolP | Voiceband Data-over-IP | +| VBDolTDM | Voiceband Data-over-TDM | + +## 5 Conventions + +None. + +## 6 Overview + +This Recommendation considers real-time facsimile services in case of IP peering. The understanding of IP peering is here simplified to the peer model of an ITU-T T.38 domain ("FoIP" for fax-over-IP) with an ITU-T V.152 domain ("VBDolP" for voiceband data-over-IP). + +Figure 1 recalls again the two interworking models of [ITU-T T.38] and [ITU-T V.152]. + +![Figure 1: Interworking models between CSN and IP networks. (1) T.38 model: Calling Terminal -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, Emitting Gateway) -> IP Domain -> FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, Receiving Gateway) -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> Called Terminal. (2) V.152 model: Calling Terminal -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function, Emitting Gateway) -> IP Domain -> VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function, Receiving Gateway) -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> Called Terminal.](053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates two interworking models between a circuit-switched network (CSN) and an IP network. Both models involve a central IP Domain connected to two gateways, which in turn connect to PSTN/GSTN Domains and terminals. + +(1) T.38 model = circuit-to-IP gateways: This model shows a Calling Terminal connected to a PSTN/GSTN Domain. This domain connects to a FoIP (Media) Gateway, which is labeled as T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function and Emitting Gateway. This gateway connects to the IP Domain. The IP Domain connects to another FoIP (Media) Gateway, labeled as T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function and Receiving Gateway. This gateway connects to a second PSTN/GSTN Domain, which is connected to a Called Terminal. + +(2) V.152 model = circuit-to-IP gateways: This model shows a Calling Terminal connected to a PSTN/GSTN Domain. This domain connects to a VBDolP (Media) Gateway, which is labeled as V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function and Emitting Gateway. This gateway connects to the IP Domain. The IP Domain connects to another VBDolP (Media) Gateway, labeled as V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function and Receiving Gateway. This gateway connects to a second PSTN/GSTN Domain, which is connected to a Called Terminal. + +Figure 1: Interworking models between CSN and IP networks. (1) T.38 model: Calling Terminal -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, Emitting Gateway) -> IP Domain -> FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, Receiving Gateway) -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> Called Terminal. (2) V.152 model: Calling Terminal -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function, Emitting Gateway) -> IP Domain -> VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolTDM-to-VBDolP Interworking Function, Receiving Gateway) -> PSTN/GSTN Domain -> Called Terminal. + +**Figure 1 – Interworking between CSN and IP networks using T.38-to-T.38 and V.152-to-V.152 topologies** + +Both models consider explicitly interworking between an IP network on one side and a circuit-switched network (CSN) on the other side: + +- ITU-T V.152: VBDolP for PSTN-to-IP interworking. +- ITU-T T.38: FoIP for GSTN-to-IP interworking. + +That means that an ITU-T V.152 gateway and an ITU-T T.38 gateway always have an IP interface and either an analogue line interface, or a digital 1 x 64 kbit/s synchronous TDM (STDM) interface. + +In this Recommendation, "IP peering" denotes the interconnection of two IP domains (at the network protocol layer). + +Each IP domain could support ITU-T V.152 only, or ITU-T T.38 only, or both, for the transport of real-time facsimile traffic. The interconnection of both IP domains is provided by an IP-to-IP gateway (e.g., like ITU-T NGN PE-FE, G.IP2IP, an ITU-T H.248 MG with an {IP, IP} connection model, or an ITU-T H.323 IP-to-IP gateway). + +The cases when both IP domains are in ITU-T V.152 or ITU-T T.38 mode will result in a so-called media-agnostic and transport-agnostic IP-to-IP "interworking" (see also clause 3 in [ITU-T Q.3303.2]), thus they are not relevant to the scope of this Recommendation. The case with different modes of operation will lead to a V.152-to-T.38 interworking function (IWF) in the IP-to-IP gateway. + +Such an IWF (illustrated in Figure 2) for facsimile in particular (or voiceband data in general) is fundamentally new due to the lack of a circuit-switched network segment (between the ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 service endpoints). + +![Figure 2: Interworking between CSN and IP networks using a T.38-to-V.152 IWF. The diagram shows a sequence of components: Calling Terminal, PSTN/GSTN Domain, VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolP Interworking Function), IP 'V.152' Domain, IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway (V.152-to-T.38: VBDolP-to-FoIP Interworking Function), IP 'T.38' Domain, FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function), PSTN/GSTN Domain, and Called Terminal.](5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg) + +(3) IP-to-IP gateways + +Figure 2: Interworking between CSN and IP networks using a T.38-to-V.152 IWF. The diagram shows a sequence of components: Calling Terminal, PSTN/GSTN Domain, VBDolP (Media) Gateway (V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolP Interworking Function), IP 'V.152' Domain, IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway (V.152-to-T.38: VBDolP-to-FoIP Interworking Function), IP 'T.38' Domain, FoIP (Media) Gateway (T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function), PSTN/GSTN Domain, and Called Terminal. + +**Figure 2 – Interworking between CSN and IP networks using a T.38-to-V.152 IWF** + +# 7 Definition of the principal modes of operation + +V.152-to-T.38 interworking in the context of IP-to-IP means cascading of the two interworking functions for [ITU-T V.152] and [ITU-T T.38]. There are basically two possibilities of interworking. + +### 7.1 Emulation mode + +Emulation mode is the indirect V.152-to-T.38 interworking when a TDM domain is internal to the IWF, as shown in Figure 3. + +![Figure 3: Emulation approach – Indirect V.152-to-T.38 interworking via a TDM domain internal to the IWF. The diagram shows an IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway containing a V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolP Interworking Function and a T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, connected by a TDM Domain. Below, protocol stacks for V.152 and T.38 are shown, including Fax/Modem, G.711, RTP, UDPTL, UDP, IP, and L1/L2 (e.g., Ethernet). A red dashed line indicates ITU-T Rec. V.153: Procedures for indirect V.152-to-T.38 Interworking.](7c6d9bfe9c31ce872722d60b73d20df1_img.jpg) + +Figure 3: Emulation approach – Indirect V.152-to-T.38 interworking via a TDM domain internal to the IWF. The diagram shows an IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway containing a V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolP Interworking Function and a T.38: FoTDM-to-FoIP Interworking Function, connected by a TDM Domain. Below, protocol stacks for V.152 and T.38 are shown, including Fax/Modem, G.711, RTP, UDPTL, UDP, IP, and L1/L2 (e.g., Ethernet). A red dashed line indicates ITU-T Rec. V.153: Procedures for indirect V.152-to-T.38 Interworking. + +**Figure 3 – Emulation approach – Indirect V.152-to-T.38 interworking via a TDM domain internal to the IWF** + +This interworking model requires the involvement of a "synchronous TDM" (STDM) domain due to the definition of both ITU-T Recommendations. Such an STDM domain would be located in an internal node. + +## 7.2 Native mode + +Native mode is the direct V.152-to-T.38 interworking where there is no TDM domain internal to the IWF, as shown in Figure 4. + +![Figure 4: Native approach – Direct V.152-to-T.38 interworking without a TDM domain internal to the IWF. The diagram shows an IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway box containing three interworking functions: V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolTDM (Note: VBD = Fax/Modem), V.153: Procedures for direct V.152-to-T.38 Interworking (highlighted in red), and T.38: FoTDM-to-FolP. On the left, an IP Domain cloud connects to the V.152 function, which links to a V.152 protocol stack (Fax/Modem, G.711, RTP, UDP, IP, L1/L2: e.g. Ethernet). On the right, an IP Domain cloud connects to the T.38 function, which links to a T.38 protocol stack (Fax, IFP, UDPTL, UDP, IP, L1/L2: e.g. Ethernet). A dashed line connects the V.152 and T.38 functions within the gateway, and a solid line connects the V.152 and T.38 stacks below.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +Figure 4: Native approach – Direct V.152-to-T.38 interworking without a TDM domain internal to the IWF. The diagram shows an IP-to-IP (Media) Gateway box containing three interworking functions: V.152: VBDolP-to-VBDolTDM (Note: VBD = Fax/Modem), V.153: Procedures for direct V.152-to-T.38 Interworking (highlighted in red), and T.38: FoTDM-to-FolP. On the left, an IP Domain cloud connects to the V.152 function, which links to a V.152 protocol stack (Fax/Modem, G.711, RTP, UDP, IP, L1/L2: e.g. Ethernet). On the right, an IP Domain cloud connects to the T.38 function, which links to a T.38 protocol stack (Fax, IFP, UDPTL, UDP, IP, L1/L2: e.g. Ethernet). A dashed line connects the V.152 and T.38 functions within the gateway, and a solid line connects the V.152 and T.38 stacks below. + +**Figure 4 – Native approach – Direct V.152-to-T.38 interworking without a TDM domain internal to the IWF** + +## 7.3 Methods for discrimination between native and emulation mode + +The node internal IWF interconnects always a "V.152 endpoint" and a "T.38 endpoint" (see also clause 9), independent of whether the native or the emulation mode is being used. + +#### 7.3.1 Mode discrimination via IWF control signalling (call-individual mode control) + +Any call individual mode control must be linked to call/session control signalling. For instance, a call/session control server may decide during the call establishment phase, on the basis of domain specific information, supported gateway capabilities, SLA information, etc., which mode may be enforced. + +NOTE – Such a method would be related to ITU-T H.248 signalling in case of ITU-T V.153-capable ITU-T H.248 media gateways. The protocol element for mode discrimination could be, e.g., a (new) ContextAttribute. + +#### 7.3.2 Mode discrimination via provisioning (call-independent mode management) + +The enforced mode may be provisioned. A gateway would be then just supporting one mode, but not both. The applied mode would be independent of the call. + +# **8 Interworking function: Specific items for consideration** + +## **8.1 ITU-T T.30 procedures** + +Handling of the ITU-T T.30 protocol shall be related to the "T.38 endpoint", and then according to [ITU-T T.38], since the ITU-T T.30 protocol is transparent for the ITU-T V.152 mode. + +NOTE – The processing of T.30-over-T.38 information and T.30-over-V.152 information is entirely decoupled in the supposed basic model of interworking in the present release of this Recommendation. A future interactive model might be beneficial for enhanced interworking services. For example, adaptation mechanisms may be considered for the ITU-T T.38 side, influencing positively the ITU-T T.38 service by considering the service performance of ITU-T V.152 (e.g., information loss in the VBDoIP domain may feedback on ITU-T T.30/T.38 timer settings, ITU-T T.38 "spoofing", etc.). + +## **8.2 Data rate management for ITU-T V.34 facsimile** + +Handling of ITU-T V.34 signals shall be related to the "T.38 endpoint", and then according to [ITU-T T.38] since ITU-T V.34 is transparent for ITU-T V.152-based communication. + +# **9 Capability negotiation/determination for V.152-to-T.38 interworking** + +## **9.1 General** + +#### **9.1.1 Capabilities of the two IP connection endpoints in the gateway** + +There are two IP connection endpoints involved in the IWF of the VBDoIP-to-FoIP gateway. Each endpoint represents an IP host function due to the termination of the IP layer and some higher layer protocols like the transport protocols and application level framing protocols. The VBDoIP-to-FoIP interworking function is thus representing a back-to-back IP host (B2BIH) configuration. The local IP addresses of each host (or IP connection endpoint) are gateway assigned IP addresses. + +The capability configuration of each host follows fundamentally the specifications of [ITU-T V.152] for the "V.152 endpoint" and [ITU-T T.38] for the "T.38 endpoint". + +##### **9.1.1.1 V.152-to-T.38 interworking mode** + +The capability negotiation/determination process for the particular V.152-to-T.38 interworking mode is out of the scope of this Recommendation. The specific mode shall be dependent on the gateway implementation. It may be assumed that a gateway implementation supports the native mode, the emulation mode, or both. + +The applied mode has just a gateway local scope (from the network perspective) and thus does not cause any interoperability issues. The control of the mode used is therefore beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +#### **9.1.2 Capability parameterization** + +Negotiation of the support and use of V.152-to-T.38 interworking mode, as defined in this Recommendation, is carried out at call establishment (e.g., SIP session establishment or ITU-T H.323 call establishment in ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 domains) during the initial exchange of call capabilities of the endpoints establishing the call. Indication of such support entails: + +- Indication of the media type (e.g., audio for ITU-T V.152 and image for ITU-T T.38 in case of SDP-based media descriptions). +- Indication of the transport protocol (e.g., UDP for ITU-T V.152, and UDP or TCP for ITU-T T.38). + +- The application level framing protocol technologies (e.g., RTP for ITU-T V.152, and UDPTL, TPKT or RTP for ITU-T T.38). A gateway following this Recommendation shall not negotiate TPKT/TCP transport for ITU-T T.38. +- Assignment of transport port values. +- Assignment of RTP payload type values (PT) in case of ITU-T V.152 (using RTP profile "AVP" according to [IETF RFC 3551]). +- Assignment of media format specific information (e.g., like packetization time, use of forward error correction, etc.). + +#### **9.1.3 Capability negotiation** + +The mechanisms for negotiation vary depending on the endpoint's capabilities exchange protocols used, which can be the session description protocol (defined in [IETF RFC 4566]) or [ITU-T H.245]; the call control protocol, as defined in [ITU-T H.323], and the session initiation protocol (SIP), defined in [IETF RFC 3261]; and/or the media gateway control protocols as defined in ITU-T H.248 and ITU-T J.171. + +Subsequent clauses describe negotiation procedures for mechanisms that use: + +- session description protocol (SDP), defined in [IETF RFC 4566], such as (but not limited to) SIP terminals, SIP gateways and ITU-T H.248 gateways; +- [ITU-T H.245] that complies with [ITU-T H.323]. + +This Recommendation does not preclude gateways from negotiating support of other mechanisms for transporting non-voice signals, such as [IETF RFC 4733] telephone events, [b-ITU-T V.150.1], and/or [b-ITU-T V.151]. + +## **9.2 Negotiation using SDP** + +#### **9.2.1 Used SDP information elements** + +##### **9.2.1.1 VBDolP (ITU-T V.152) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, clause 7 of [ITU-T V.152] applies. + +##### **9.2.1.2 FoIP (ITU-T T.38) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, Annex D.2.3 of [ITU-T T.38] applies. + +#### **9.2.2 Mechanisms for gateway control using the H.248 protocol** + +##### **9.2.2.1 VBDolP (ITU-T V.152) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, clause 7.1 of [ITU-T V.152] applies. + +##### **9.2.2.2 FoIP (ITU-T T.38) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, Annex E and Appendix III of [ITU-T T.38] apply. + +#### **9.2.3 Mechanisms for gateway control using the H.323 protocol** + +##### **9.2.3.1 VBDolP (ITU-T V.152) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, clause 7.2 of [ITU-T V.152] applies. + +##### **9.2.3.2 FoIP (ITU-T T.38) local endpoint** + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, Annexes B and G, and Appendix II of [ITU-T T.38] apply. + +#### 9.2.4 Mechanisms for gateway control using SIP + +##### 9.2.4.1 VBDolP (ITU-T V.152) local endpoint + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, clause 7.1.2 of [ITU-T V.152] applies. + +##### 9.2.4.2 FoIP (ITU-T T.38) local endpoint + +For the purpose of this Recommendation, Annex D of [ITU-T T.38] applies. + +## 10 Handling of stimuli between VBDolP and FoIP + +Transitioning between operational modes of VBDolP and FoIP connection endpoints (see clause 11) is triggered by stimuli information. Figure 5 illustrates the principal flows of stimuli information for an ITU-T V.153 gateway. There are dedicated stimuli, associated to the IP bearer-paths, for [ITU-T T.38] and [ITU-T V.152]. For instance, clause 9 in [ITU-T V.152] mandates the list of relevant VBD stimuli. + +NOTE – The transport of stimuli in the IP bearer path may depend on the operational mode. For example, the default mode (if available) for [ITU-T T.38] and [ITU-T V.152] is audio VoIP and an in-band based stimuli transport: hence, stimuli encoding is identical to audio encoding. Stimuli transport in ITU-T T.38 FoIP mode is related to specific codepoints in ITU-T T.38 IFP packets (see clause 7 in [ITU-T T.38]). Stimuli transport in ITU-T V.152 VBDolP mode may be either via a network telephone event (NTE) encoding according to [IETF RFC 4733], or in-band using the ITU-T V.152 VBD codec. The two possibilities lead to different RTP packet types with dedicated RTP payload type values. + +There might be further stimuli issued via the control plane, i.e., originating in call control level decisions. + +![Diagram illustrating the handling of stimuli between VBDolP and FoIP. The diagram shows a central box labeled 'V.153 Interworking Function' containing two endpoints: 'T.38 endpoint' and 'V.152 endpoint'. External stimuli (T.38 and V.152) enter via IP bearer connections. Internal stimuli flow between the endpoints. A control plane connection is also shown.](a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the handling of stimuli within the V.153 Interworking Function. It features two main components: the 'T.38 endpoint' and the 'V.152 endpoint'. External stimuli for T.38 and V.152 enter the system via 'IP bearer connection' lines. These stimuli are then processed internally, with 'Stimuli (internal)' being exchanged between the two endpoints. Additionally, a 'Stimuli (control plane)' connection is shown at the top, indicating control-level stimuli input. + +Diagram illustrating the handling of stimuli between VBDolP and FoIP. The diagram shows a central box labeled 'V.153 Interworking Function' containing two endpoints: 'T.38 endpoint' and 'V.152 endpoint'. External stimuli (T.38 and V.152) enter via IP bearer connections. Internal stimuli flow between the endpoints. A control plane connection is also shown. + +**Figure 5 – Handling of stimuli between VBDolP and FoIP** + +As it concerns internal handling of stimuli information by the ITU-T V.153 gateway, the recognition of (external) stimulus information in the IP bearer path implies a detection function. Detected stimuli on the ingress side by the ITU-T T.38 endpoint shall be provided to the internal ITU-T V.152 endpoint and vice versa. This approach should facilitate fast, unambiguous and synchronized state transitioning in both endpoints. + +# 11 Synchronization of state transitioning between VBDoIP and FoIP state machines + +There are two operational modes in [ITU-T V.152]: audio (VoIP) and voiceband data (VBDoIP). On its turn, [ITU-T T.38] also has two operational modes that can be classified as audio (VoIP) and facsimile packet relay (FoIP). The resulting state model for ITU-T V.153 gateways is illustrated in Figure 6. State transitioning between operational modes of the ITU-T T.38 endpoint and ITU-T V.152 endpoint is fundamentally triggered by stimuli (like VBD stimuli in case of [ITU-T V.152]); see also clause 10. + +![Figure 6: Synchronization of state transitioning between VBDoIP and FoIP state machines. The diagram shows two endpoints, T.38 and V.152, connected via an IP bearer connection. The T.38 endpoint has three states: Fax packet relay mode (T.38 FoIP), Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP), and Audio mode (VoIP). The V.152 endpoint has two states: Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP) and Audio mode (VoIP). Solid arrows show transitions within each endpoint. Dashed arrows show transitions between endpoints, labeled 'Coupling of state machines?'. A note at the bottom states: 'Note: V.152 mode is out of scope for T.38 endpoint (because state is not defined in [ITU-T T.38] and V.152-to-V.152 interworking is out of scope of this Recommendation).'](0f985b39edc1d52ba3600c438bc8f0a5_img.jpg) + +Note: V.152 mode is out of scope for T.38 endpoint (because state is not defined in [ITU-T T.38] and V.152-to-V.152 interworking is out of scope of this Recommendation). + +Figure 6: Synchronization of state transitioning between VBDoIP and FoIP state machines. The diagram shows two endpoints, T.38 and V.152, connected via an IP bearer connection. The T.38 endpoint has three states: Fax packet relay mode (T.38 FoIP), Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP), and Audio mode (VoIP). The V.152 endpoint has two states: Voiceband data mode (V.152 VBDoIP) and Audio mode (VoIP). Solid arrows show transitions within each endpoint. Dashed arrows show transitions between endpoints, labeled 'Coupling of state machines?'. A note at the bottom states: 'Note: V.152 mode is out of scope for T.38 endpoint (because state is not defined in [ITU-T T.38] and V.152-to-V.152 interworking is out of scope of this Recommendation).' + +**Figure 6 – Synchronization of state transitioning between VBDoIP and FoIP state machines** + +Synchronization of state transitioning in ITU-T V.153 gateways: + +- ITU-T T.38 endpoint: + - a state transitioning from audio to fax relay shall lead to a state transitioning from audio to VBD on the ITU-T V.152 side; + - a state transitioning from fax relay to audio should lead to a state transitioning from VBD to audio on the ITU-T V.152 side (NOTE – The transitioning is optional because the VBD mode allows (limited) support of audio). +- ITU-T V.152 endpoint: + - a state transitioning from audio to VBD shall lead to a state transitioning from audio to fax relay on the ITU-T T.38 side if the VBD stimuli is indicating fax/modem traffic; + - a state transitioning from VBD to audio shall lead to a state transitioning from fax relay to audio on the ITU-T T.38 side (because the FoIP mode is not suited for audio traffic). + +# Appendix I + +## Performance evaluation of both modes of operation + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +From a user's point of view, the quality of the facsimile transmission service is dependent on a number of factors. The VBDoIP-to-FoIP gateway itself is contributing to the end-to-end QoS primarily on grade of service metrics: IP transfer delay (IPTD), IP packet loss ratio (IPLR) and IP packet delay variation (IPDV), due to the location of this gateway entirely within the IP network portion. The contribution to IPTD, IPDV and IPLR is discussed in clauses I.1, I.2 and I.3, respectively. + +### I.1 Gateway transfer delay + +The transfer delay $\tau_{GW}$ of an VBDoIP-to-FoIP gateway may be separated into the two traffic direction specific one-way transfer delay metrics ( $\tau_{GW,F2VBD}$ and $\tau_{GW,VBD2F}$ ). Each transfer delay represents the sum of all service times (e.g., like protocol layer Lx termination functions or the gateway interworking function) and all waiting times. + +There is a significant difference between gateway transfer delays for the two modes of operation (native and emulated VBDoIP-to-FoIP modes). The emulated mode represents: + +- a "low speed" infrastructure due to the 64-kbit/s transport capacity, and +- a "jitter-less" infrastructure due to synchronous TDM. + +The IWF-internal TDM domain consequently adds further delay components for, e.g., packetization and dejittering. There might be further delay added depending on the IWF realization, e.g., packet loss concealment features. + +The IP packets for VBDoIP and FoIP traffic usually use packetization times of 10 ms or higher. The IP packet delay variation (IPDV) in the IP domains is greater than zero and may be estimated, e.g., as a few milliseconds. + +The following relation holds then between the gateway transfer delays for the two modes of operation: + +$$\tau_{GW,Native} \approx \tau_{GW,Emulation} - \delta_{TDM}$$ + +The "TDM domain" specific delay component $\delta_{TDM}$ shall represent the sum of all the above indicated effects and may be for instance estimated to be greater than 10 ms (e.g., 15 ms) per direction. + +The native mode has consequently a much lower gateway transfer delay than the emulation approach. + +### I.2 Gateway transfer delay variation + +The VBDoIP-to-FoIP gateway could contribute to a reduction of the IPDV of the egress IP traffic by enforcing a traffic shaping function, of course at the expense of adding further transfer delay. Any explicit traffic shaping function is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +It may be noted that the IWF-internal TDM domain in the emulation mode is inherently representing a traffic shaping function. It may be thus assumed that the IP packet delay variation of the outgoing IP traffic in emulation mode might be smaller than that in native mode ( $IPDV_{GW,out,Emulation} < IPDV_{GW,out,Native}$ ). + +### **I.3 Gateway information loss** + +The VBDolP-to-FoIP gateway should not contribute to IPLR, independently of the mode of interworking. The gateway should consequently not lose or discard any packet node-internally. + +### **I.4 Dejitter buffer aspects** + +Use of dejitter buffers impact fundamentally the one-way transfer delay of information. + +#### **I.4.1 Emulated VBDolP-to-FoIP mode** + +[ITU-T V.152] has the requirement for a constant end-to-end transfer delay, which implies freezing the jitter buffer settings when entering the ITU-T V.152 mode. From a jitter buffer perspective, the emulated VBDolP-to-FoIP mode should not cause any performance impact. + +#### **I.4.2 Native VBDolP-to-FoIP mode** + +There is basically no requirement for dejittering in native mode due to the direct packet-to-packet interworking. In detail: + +- 1) Traffic from the ITU-T T.38 domain to the ITU-T V.152 domain: +The termination of ingress ITU-T T.38 packets does not require any dejitter buffer. Therefore, there should not be any dejitter buffer in that direction. +- 2) Traffic from the ITU-T V.152 domain to the ITU-T T.38 domain: +The termination of ingress ITU-T V.152 packets implies a dejitter buffer, should the ITU-T V.152 protocol termination strictly follow [ITU-T V.152]. However, a dejitter buffer may be omitted if the ITU-T T.38 sender process is able to immediately process the incoming ITU-T V.152 traffic. + +NOTE – The ITU-T T.38 sender process typically expects a constant bit rate, 64-kbit/s signal in case of a digital PSTN access. The ITU-T V.152 domain provides the "access role" in ITU-T V.153 configurations, and there might be lost, too late or misinserted IP packets from the ITU-T V.152 side. This potential reduction in QoS of the VBDolP signal (versus VBDolTDM) may demand further consideration for ITU-T T.38 encoders (for that mode, in ITU-T V.153 gateways). + +### **I.5 Aspect of redundant packet transport** + +Any kind of redundant packet transport should fundamentally minimize the observed IPLR. + +#### **I.5.1 Transport redundancy in ITU-T V.152 domain** + +Redundant packet transport in ITU-T V.152 domains must follow [IETF RFC 2198], see clause 6 in [ITU-T V.152]. This redundancy method is independent of the dejitter buffer discussions in clause I.4, and does not affect the question whether a dejitter buffer should be used or not in the V.152-to-T.38 direction. + +#### **I.5.2 Transport redundancy in the ITU-T T.38 domain** + +Redundant packet transport in ITU-T T.38 domains is inherent to the applied ITU-T T.38 transport mode: + +- **T.38-over-UDPTL/UDP:** redundancy mechanism according to clause 9.1.4.1 of [ITU-T T.38]. +- **T.38-over-RTP/UDP:** redundancy mechanism according to [IETF RFC 2198], see clause 9.2 in [ITU-T T.38]. +- **T.38-over-TPKT/TCP:** TCP provides an inherent "on request redundancy" by retransmitting unacknowledged TCP packets. + +As in clause I.5.1, none of the above redundancy methods imply the need for a dejitter buffer. + +# Appendix II + +## H.248 bearer establishment procedure examples + +(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) + +### II.1 Introduction + +This appendix describes examples of the procedures for Internet-aware facsimile and voiceband data gateways conforming to this Recommendation to establish calls between ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 network domains. The decomposed gateway model follows [ITU-T H.248.1]. + +### II.2 MG state transitioning: MGC-strict controlled method versus MG autonomous transitioning + +Appendix III of [ITU-T T.38] defines two methods for state transitioning of audio/T.38 endpoints implemented in PSTN-to-IP ITU-T H.248 media gateways. This Recommendation only considers the MGC-controlled ITU-T T.38 transitioning behaviour (see clause II.4.2.1). + +NOTE – The underlying ITU-T H.248 connection model (for ITU-T H.248 gateways compliant to this Recommendation) relates to an ITU-T H.248 context with two IP terminations. + +### II.3 Example network model + +#### II.3.1 ITU-T H.248 decomposed gateway model + +The technology defined by this Recommendation is required for interworking between ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 IP network domains. Figure II.1 illustrates such an example end-to-end scenario with a V.152-to-T.38 gateway as peering node between the two IP networks. The two Group 3 fax equipment (G3FE) terminals are behind PSTN access networks. + +![Figure II.1: Typical decomposed gateway model as interworking point between an ITU-T V.152 domain and an ITU-T T.38 domain. The diagram shows a central 'Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway' connected via SIP to two 'Remote' gateways: a 'Remote V.152 Gateway' and a 'Remote T.38 Gateway'. The 'Local Gateway' is connected to an 'IP Network' which is part of the 'V.152 Domain' and the 'T.38 Domain'. The 'Remote V.152 Gateway' is connected to a 'PSTN' network via a 'Circuit-Switched Bearer' and 'PSTN Call signalling'. The 'Remote T.38 Gateway' is connected to a 'PSTN' network via a 'Circuit-Switched Bearer' and 'PSTN Call signalling'. A 'Call/Session Control Server (e.g. MGCF, IBCF)' is connected to the 'Local Gateway' via SIP. The 'Local Gateway' is also connected to an 'IP Bearer (VBD/RTP/UDP/IP)' and an 'IP Network'.](cdd4dfacab004e9979caed3fffea69e5_img.jpg) + +G3 Fax (Dual-Mode Terminal) +G3FE ... Group 3 Facsimile Equipment + +Figure II.1: Typical decomposed gateway model as interworking point between an ITU-T V.152 domain and an ITU-T T.38 domain. The diagram shows a central 'Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway' connected via SIP to two 'Remote' gateways: a 'Remote V.152 Gateway' and a 'Remote T.38 Gateway'. The 'Local Gateway' is connected to an 'IP Network' which is part of the 'V.152 Domain' and the 'T.38 Domain'. The 'Remote V.152 Gateway' is connected to a 'PSTN' network via a 'Circuit-Switched Bearer' and 'PSTN Call signalling'. The 'Remote T.38 Gateway' is connected to a 'PSTN' network via a 'Circuit-Switched Bearer' and 'PSTN Call signalling'. A 'Call/Session Control Server (e.g. MGCF, IBCF)' is connected to the 'Local Gateway' via SIP. The 'Local Gateway' is also connected to an 'IP Bearer (VBD/RTP/UDP/IP)' and an 'IP Network'. + +Figure II.1 – Typical decomposed gateway model as interworking point between an ITU-T V.152 domain and an ITU-T T.38 domain + +The (local) V.152-to-T.38 gateway is thus between a remote ITU-T V.152 (PSTN-to-IP) gateway [ITU-T V.152] and a remote ITU-T T.38 (PSTN-to-IP) gateway [ITU-T T.38]. + +#### II.3.2 Example media capability negotiation process on call/session control level + +Assume SIP is the call/session control protocol in the IP network, i.e., between the local and the two remote gateways. The media and bearer capability negotiation procedures are therefore based on the + +SDP offer/answer (O/A) model (as per [b-IETF RFC 3264]); see also Figure II.2. The O/A capability negotiation is tied to call/session control signalling. ITU-T H.248 uses a different model for capability negotiations, namely the resource reservation procedures according to clause 7 of [ITU-T H.248.1]. + +![Figure II.2: End-to-end media capability negotiation across two IP domains. The diagram shows a call flow from a PSTN gateway (Remote V.152 Gateway) through an IP network (Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway) to another PSTN gateway (Remote T.38 Gateway). The Remote V.152 Gateway acts as a SIP UA, and the Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway acts as a SIP B2BUA. The Remote T.38 Gateway acts as a SIP UA. The diagram illustrates the SIP SDP Offer/Answer based media capability negotiation process, showing the supported and preferred codecs for each domain. The V.152 Domain supports V.152, T.38 (NO), and G.7... Preferred codecs are V.152, G.729, and RFC 4040. The T.38 Domain supports V.152, T.38, and G.7... Preferred codecs are T.38, V.151, G.711, and RFC 4040. The call is established over a Circuit-Switched Bearer (PSTN) and an IP Bearer (VBD/RTP/UDP/IP).](83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg) + +Call Establishment Direction + +Role: SIP UA      Role: SIP B2BUA      Role: SIP UA + +*SIP SDP Offer/Answer based media capability negotiation* + +**V.152 Domain** + +- Supported Codecs: + - V.152 + - T.38 (NO) + - G.7... + - ... +- Prefered Codecs: + - V.152 + - G.729 + - RFC 4040 + +**T.38 Domain** + +- Supported Codecs: + - V.152 + - T.38 + - G.7... + - ... +- Prefered Codecs: + - T.38 + - V.151 + - G.711 + - RFC 4040 + +PSTN Call signalling + +Circuit-Switched Bearer + +PSTN + +**Remote V.152 Gateway** + +Role: V.152 on-ramp GW + +IP Bearer (VBD/RTP/UDP/IP) + +IP Network + +**Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway** + +Roles: V.152 off-ramp GW, T.38 on-ramp GW + +SIP + +H.248 + +IP Bearer (e.g. Fax T.38 / UDPTL / UDP/IP) + +IP Network + +**Remote T.38 Gateway** + +Role: T.38 off-ramp GW + +Circuit-Switched Bearer + +PSTN + +Figure II.2: End-to-end media capability negotiation across two IP domains. The diagram shows a call flow from a PSTN gateway (Remote V.152 Gateway) through an IP network (Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway) to another PSTN gateway (Remote T.38 Gateway). The Remote V.152 Gateway acts as a SIP UA, and the Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway acts as a SIP B2BUA. The Remote T.38 Gateway acts as a SIP UA. The diagram illustrates the SIP SDP Offer/Answer based media capability negotiation process, showing the supported and preferred codecs for each domain. The V.152 Domain supports V.152, T.38 (NO), and G.7... Preferred codecs are V.152, G.729, and RFC 4040. The T.38 Domain supports V.152, T.38, and G.7... Preferred codecs are T.38, V.151, G.711, and RFC 4040. The call is established over a Circuit-Switched Bearer (PSTN) and an IP Bearer (VBD/RTP/UDP/IP). + +**Figure II.2 – End-to-end media capability negotiation across the two IP domains – Example with a one-stage SDP offer/answer cycle between the two remote PSTN gateways** + +The V.152-to-T.38 interworking function will be enforced in the local gateway due to the example scenario of Figure II.2. + +The "end-to-end" capability negotiation process is based on "codec lists" that are associated to a domain (e.g., preferred codecs by a service/network provider), to call/session control servers (e.g., supported codecs by controlled transport nodes like media gateways, media servers, etc.) and to the equipment which sources/sinks the media flows (in this example, the PSTN gateways from a SIP capability negotiation perspective). + +The remote PSTN gateways provide SIP UA behaviour. The local gateway provides a SIP B2BUA function. The SDP capabilities are negotiated between the SIP UA entities. + +The call is originated in the left hand side G3 fax device. The left hand side IP domain prefers ITU-T V.152 (instead of ITU-T T.38) for facsimile, e.g., due to fairly good QoS figures of this network domain (e.g., an IPLR below 0.5% due to an underlying QoS enhanced MPLS network). The remote ITU-T V.152 on-ramp gateway then generates a SIP INVITE containing an SDP offer with an audio codec and an ITU-T V.152 VBD codec, due to the supported codec list, which misses the ITU-T T.38 codec for facsimile, and the preferred codec list with ITU-T V.152 for all kinds of voiceband data services. + +The SIP INVITE is then processed by the local gateway, which modifies the forwarded SDP offer by replacing ITU-T V.152 with ITU-T T.38 (due to the preference of ITU-T T.38 for facsimile in + +this IP domain). The replied SDP answer message then successfully acknowledges the offered media formats in this example. + +The MGC function in the local gateway may then create an ITU-T H.248 context (see Figure II.3) with the selected audio codec(s) and the V.152-to-T.38 interworking function. + +![Figure II.3: Consideration of the local V.152-to-T.38 gateway – Example of an ITU-T H.248 decomposed gateway model. The diagram illustrates a decomposed gateway architecture. On the left, a PSTN network connects to a '(B1) Remote V.152 GW' (PSTN Gateway). This gateway connects to an 'IP Network' at the 'IP Bearer Level' via a V.152 interface. The 'IP Network' also connects to a '(A) Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway' at the 'IP Call/Session Control level'. This local gateway contains a 'Call/Session Control Server' and a 'Media Gateway'. The 'Call/Session Control Server' connects to the 'Media Gateway' via an 'H.248' interface. The 'Media Gateway' contains a 'Context' block with two terminals, 'T1' and 'T2'. The 'Media Gateway' connects to another 'IP Network' at the 'IP Bearer Level' via a T.38 interface. This second 'IP Network' connects to a '(B2) Remote T.38 GW' (PSTN Gateway), which then connects to a PSTN network on the right. The 'IP Network' also connects to the 'Call/Session Control Server' at the 'IP Call/Session Control level'.](c5655e700cc3e9aac7e9f4f07f30264d_img.jpg) + +Figure II.3: Consideration of the local V.152-to-T.38 gateway – Example of an ITU-T H.248 decomposed gateway model. The diagram illustrates a decomposed gateway architecture. On the left, a PSTN network connects to a '(B1) Remote V.152 GW' (PSTN Gateway). This gateway connects to an 'IP Network' at the 'IP Bearer Level' via a V.152 interface. The 'IP Network' also connects to a '(A) Local V.152-to-T.38 Gateway' at the 'IP Call/Session Control level'. This local gateway contains a 'Call/Session Control Server' and a 'Media Gateway'. The 'Call/Session Control Server' connects to the 'Media Gateway' via an 'H.248' interface. The 'Media Gateway' contains a 'Context' block with two terminals, 'T1' and 'T2'. The 'Media Gateway' connects to another 'IP Network' at the 'IP Bearer Level' via a T.38 interface. This second 'IP Network' connects to a '(B2) Remote T.38 GW' (PSTN Gateway), which then connects to a PSTN network on the right. The 'IP Network' also connects to the 'Call/Session Control Server' at the 'IP Call/Session Control level'. + +**Figure II.3 – Consideration of the local V.152-to-T.38 gateway – +Example of an ITU-T H.248 decomposed gateway model** + +The ITU-T H.248 decomposed model for the local gateway in Figure II.3 is just an example. The remote PSTN gateways might be again an ITU-T H.248 gateway type (e.g., following [b-ETSI ES 283 002] for residential/access gateways or [b-3GPP 29.332] for IMS/PES trunking gateways), or an ITU-T H.323 gateway or a SIP voice gateway (following [b-ETSI TS 182 012]). For the purposes of this Recommendation, the deployed IP call/session control protocol (like SIP, SIP-I, BICC, ITU-T H.323) must support capability negotiation methods for exchanging at least audio, ITU-T V.152 and ITU-T T.38 codec information. + +### II.4 Example signalling + +#### II.4.1 Auditing supported capabilities + +At some point before a call, the media gateway controller will have audited the supported capabilities of his associated media gateways (see also Appendix III of [ITU-T T.38]). The codec related information is then stored in the "list of supported codecs" (which may actually be a list of following tuples {media type, media format, media attributes and default parameter values for this media format}). + +The information of supported MG capabilities (including supported codecs) may be alternatively provisioned at the MGC/SIP B2BUA level (in case of SIP-based call/session control). + +Later MG capability changes may be indicated by ServiceChange procedures. + +#### II.4.2 Creating a V.152-to-T.38 Context + +The creation of the V.152-to-T.38 interworking function relates to the creation of a corresponding ITU-T H.248 context in the local media gateway. The signalling events correspond to ADD.request and Modify.request commands for the two H.248 (IP) ephemeral terminations. It may be emphasized again that there is not any ITU-T H.248 physical termination (Note) in this context. + +NOTE – There are ITU-T H.248 contexts of type physical-to-IP in the remote peering nodes in case of ITU-T H.248 gateways. The physical termination typically provides circuit related functions like (electrical) echo cancellation, gain control, etc. It may thus be noted that the local gateway misses the usual tdmc package related functions. + +Below examples depict the context creation phase, as well as subsequent event detections and state transitioning actions. + +##### II.4.2.1 V.152-to-T.38 context and ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method + +Table II.1 provides example stream descriptors for the two added ITU-T H.248 terminations. Here it is assumed that the MGC function in the local gateway does not decide on a per-call basis whether the ITU-T T.38 autonomous transitioning method, or whether the ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method is to be applied. Rather, it is assumed that the MGC function always applies the MGC controlled transitioning method. + +The MGC controlled transitioning method implies that the local MG must support ITU-T H.248.2 protocol capabilities (primarily for reporting detected stimuli in the IP bearer-path). + +Consider the example of an alternate speech/fax service composed of the three call phases of audio, facsimile transmission and switch back to audio again. + +Five steps highlight the major ITU-T H.248 signalling information. The first step is related to the entire creation of the ITU-T H.248 context, the establishment of the ITU-T H.248 stream and the bearer preparation for audio. The two subsequent steps are mid-call activities related to the start of fax transmission, and the last two steps describe the transition back to audio, after a successful fax transmission. + +**Step 1 (Table II.1):** request/reply cycle for the addition of two new IP terminations into a new context. It should be noted that there is no further capability (codec) negotiation required over the ITU-T H.248 interface since the MGC is aware of the capability negotiation at SIP level. The MG issues ADD.request commands to reflect the selected codec decisions for the two media categories of audio and facsimile/modem. + +**Table II.1 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – Creation of a V.152-to-T.38 context – ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 1** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 1) Request (MGC to MG): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.65] ... Add = ip/2/\$/\$ { ; IP "V.152" Termination Media {   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.     LocalControl{       ipdc/realn = "providerX.com"       ; IP network indication (here "V.152 domain")       Mode=SendReceive,       ReservedGroup = OFF,       ReservedValue = OFF ; because just single                            ; audio codec     },     Local{       v=0       c=IN IP4 \$       m=audio \$ RTP/AVP 8 101 111       a=maxptime:20 - 30       a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 ; RFC 4733/4       a=rtpmap:111 PCMA/8000           ; ITU-T V.152       a=gpmid:111 vbd=yes     },     Remote{ ; Remote descriptor might also be sent in             ; a later Modify request       v=0       c=IN IP4 19.70.3.2       m=audio 54530 RTP/AVP 8 101 111       a=maxptime:20 - 30       a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 ; RFC 4733/4       a=rtpmap:111 PCMA/8000           ; ITU-T V.152       a=gpmid:111 vbd=yes     }   },   Events = 1234 {ctyp/dtone} ; MGC requests H.248.2                            ; ctyp/dtone event                            ; notification }, Add = ip/8/\$/\$ { ; IP "T.38" Termination Media {   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.     LocalControl{       ipdc/realn = "providerY.com"       ; IP network indication (here "T.38 domain")       Mode=SendReceive,       ReservedGroup = OFF, ; one media group       ReservedValue = OFF ; just one audio codec, might                            ; also be ON in case two or                            ; audio codecs are requested                            ; in 'audio' media descr.     },     Local{       v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"       c=IN IP4 \$       ...       m=audio \$ RTP/AVP 8 127       a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000       a=ptime:20     },     Remote{       v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"       c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65       ...       m=audio 100 RTP/AVP 8 127       a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000       a=ptime:20     }   }, }, } 
|

IP "V.152" termination:

In this example, the MGC requests (from the local MG) a PCMA audio codec with telephone-events and a PCMA VBD codec. The Reserve property values are false due to single group and single "media format" for Stream 1 (NOTE – RFC 4733/4734 and V.152 are supplementary media formats with regard to the audio format, see clause 7.1.7.1.3 of [ITU-T H.248.1]).

Local Descriptor:

The MGC selects RTP PT equal to 111 for the VBD codec due to MGC provisioning. Ditto for RFC 4733/4734 codec. The maxptime attribute is used in this example due to different packetization times in each state.

Remote Descriptor:

The MGC generates the RD (and LD) based on the SDP O/A process, which corresponds to the offered audio and VBD codec from the remote PSTN gateway. The MGC is aware that the remote gateway is ITU-T V.152 compliant (due to ITU-T V.152 SDP in the received SIP offer).

Events descriptor:

The MGC subscribes for the ITU-T H.248.2 ctyp/dtone event on the "V.152" IP termination (Note) to be notified in case (fax) modem specific events are detected.

IP "T.38" termination:

The Reserved Group property value is Off as the MG requests to reserve resources only for the PCMA audio codec. ITU-T T.38 specific resources will be reserved and allocated later on during the actual MGC controlled transitioning (see stream modification by Step 3 – Table II.3).

| + +**Table II.1 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – Creation of a V.152-to-T.38 context – ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 1** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 2) Reply (MG to MGC): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.70] ... Add = ip/2/2/1 { ; IP "V.152" Termination Media {   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.     Local{       v=0       c=IN IP4 19.70.27.4       m=audio 40008 RTP/AVP 8 101 111       a=maxptime:20 - 30       a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 ; RFC 4733/4       a=rtpmap:111 PCMA/8000 ; ITU-T V.152       a=gpmd:111 vbd=yes     },     Remote{ ; Remote descriptor might also be sent in               ; a later Modify request       v=0       c=IN IP4 19.70.3.2       m=audio 54530 RTP/AVP 8 101 111       a=maxptime:20 - 30       a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 ; RFC 4733/4       a=rtpmap:111 PCMA/8000 ; ITU-T V.152       a=gpmd:111 vbd=yes     }   }, }, Add = ip/8/3/2 { ; IP "T.38" Termination Media {   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.     Local{       v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"       c=IN IP4 12.9.4.6       ...       m=audio 40120 RTP/AVP 8 127       a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000       a=ptime:20     },     Remote{       v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"       c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65       ...       m=audio 100 RTP/AVP 8 127       a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000       a=ptime:20     }   }, }, } 
|

The two ADD reply commands do successfully acknowledge the requested media capabilities and stream configurations.

| +|

NOTE – It may be noted that the ITU-T H.248.2 event is associated to the ITU-T V.152 side termination and not the ITU-T T.38 side termination since after the autonomous transition to the ITU-T V.152 this termination may reliably detect corresponding fax modem related events – even in case compressing audio codecs had been requested in the initial Add.request.

| | + +**Step 2 (Table II.2):** request/reply cycle, initiated now by the MG due to detected events. This event notification will be the trigger for the MGC for starting step 3. + +**Table II.2 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 2** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
3) Notification Request (MG to MGC): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.70] ... Notify = ip/2/2/1 { ; IP "V.152" Termination  ObservedEvents = 1234 {20081203T12101025 :  ctyp/dtone{dtt=V21flag}} }
| The "V.152" side IP termination may additionally report further observed events, e.g., regarding CNG or CED tone detection before reporting detection of ITU-T V.21 flags. Corresponding notification requests are not shown here. These events may be received and observed either in-band (possibly after the autonomous transition to VBD) or out-of-band via RFC 4733/4734 NTE events. | +|
4) Notification Reply (MGC to MG): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.65] ... Notify = ip/2/2/1
| | + +**Step 3 (Table II.3):** request/reply cycle for modifying the two stream endpoints. The first MODIFY.request command is necessary for disabling the event detection logic, associated on the ITU-T V.152 side. The second MODIFY.request command creates and configures the local ITU-T T.38 endpoint. + +It may be noted that the ITU-T T.38 packet flow as well as the previously established ITU-T G.711 audio flow share both the same ITU-T H.248 stream (which is identified by the value '1'). Actually, there are three transport flows carried by that stream: PCMA/RTP media flow, RTCP control flow and ITU-T T.38 UDPTL flow. The three flow components are discriminated by three separate IP transport addresses. The RFC 4733/4734 packet traffic relates to a sub-flow component, sharing the same transport address with RTP audio, but uses a different payload type codepoint (values '127' and '8' respectively). + +**Table II.3 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 3** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
5) Modification Request (MGC to MG): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.65] ... Modify = ip/2/2/1 { ; IP "V.152" Termination  Events }, Modify = ip/8/3/2 { ; IP "T.38" Termination  Media {   TerminationState {    ipfax/faxstate = Negotiating ; initial fax state   },   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.    LocalControl{     ipdc/realm = "providerY.com"     ; IP network indication (here "T.38 domain")     Mode=SendReceive,     ReservedGroup = OFF , ; one media group     ReservedValue = OFF ; just one media format t38    },    Local{     v=0 ; Media Group "packet relay flow for fax"     c=IN IP4 \$     m=image \$ udptl t38     a=T38FaxVersion:1     a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF     a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPFEC     a=T38FaxMaxBufferSize:2000     a=T38MaxDatagram:512     a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
|

IP "V.152" termination:
MGC clears ctyp/dtone event subscription.

IP "T.38" termination:
MGC modifies the IP termination with a T.38 specific session/media description. The MGC generates the RD based on the SDP O/A process. Note that the RD may also be sent by the MGC in an additional subsequent modification request (depending on when the remote address and media information is available).
MGC sets the faxstate property to the initial value 'Negotiating' and subscribes for the 'faxconnchange' event to ensure notification in case the end-of-fax event is observed.
The applied T.38 transfer mode is based on UDPTL/UDP/IPv4 transport in this example.

| + +**Table II.3 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 3** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------| +|
 (... additional T.38 attributes may be included) }, Remote{   v=0 ; Media Group "packet relay flow for fax"   c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65   ..   m=image 102 udpt1 t38   a=T38FaxVersion:1   a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF   a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPFEC   a=T38FaxMaxBufferSize:2000   a=T38MaxDatagram:512   a=T38MaxBitRate:14400   (... additional T.38 attributes may be included) } }, Events = 1235 {   ipfax/faxconnchange ; registration for end-of-fax                        ; event } } 
| | +|
 6) Modification Reply (MG to MGC): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.70] ... Modify = ip/8/3/2 { ; IP "T.38" Termination Media {   Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.   Local{     v=0 ; Media Group "packet relay flow for fax"     c=IN IP4 12.9.4.6     m=image 58130 udpt1 t38     a=T38FaxVersion:1     a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF     a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPFEC     a=T38FaxMaxBufferSize:2000     a=T38MaxDatagram:512     a=T38MaxBitRate:14400     (... additional T.38 attributes may be included)   },   Remote{     v=0 ; Media Group "packet relay flow for fax"     c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65     ..     m=image 102 udpt1 t38     a=T38FaxVersion:1     a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF     a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPFEC     a=T38FaxMaxBufferSize:2000     a=T38MaxDatagram:512     a=T38MaxBitRate:14400     (... additional T.38 attributes may be included)   } } }}} 
|

Again, a positive acknowledgement by the MG

| + +**Step 4 (Table II.4):** request/reply cycle, initiated now by the MG due to a detected event concerning successful end of fax transmission. This event notification will be the trigger for the MGC for starting step 5 in order to switch back to audio. + +**Table II.4 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 4** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 7) Notification Request (MG to MGC): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.70] ... Notify = ip/8/3/2 {   ObservedEvents = 1235 {     ipfax/faxconnchange{faxconnchnge=EOF}   } } 
| "T.38" IP termination reports detection of end-of-fax event. | +|
 8) Notification Reply (MGC to MG): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.65] ... Notify = ip/8/3/2 
| | + +**Step 5 (Table II.5):** request/reply cycle for restoring the audio information again on the ITU-T T.38 side. + +**Table II.5 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 5** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
 9) Modification Request (MGC to MG): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.65] ... Modify = ip/2/2/1 { ; IP "V.152" Termination   Events = 1234 {ctyp/dtone} ; MGC requests H.248.2                            ; ctyp/dtone event                            ; notification }, Modify = ip/8/3/2 { ; IP "T.38" Termination   Media {     Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.       LocalControl{         ipdc/realm = "providerY.com"         ; IP network indication (here "T.38 domain")         Mode=SendReceive,         ReservedGroup = OFF, ; one media group         ReservedValue = OFF ; just one audio codec, might                            ; also be ON in case two or                            ; audio codecs are requested                            ; in 'audio' media descr.       },       Local{         v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"         c=IN IP4 12.9.4.6         ...         m=audio 40120 RTP/AVP 8 127         a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000         a=ptime:20       },       Remote{         v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"         c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65         ...         m=audio 100 RTP/AVP 8 127         a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000         a=ptime:20       }     }   } } 
|

IP "V.152" termination:
The MGC subscribes for the ITU-T H.248.2 ctyp/dtone event on the "V.152" IP termination to be notified in case (fax) modem specific events are detected.

IP "T.38" termination:
MGC restores the audio codec based LD and RD. There is no need to modify the faxstate property as the MG sets this implicitly whenever the fax state changes.

| + +**Table II.5 – Example ITU-T H.248 stream descriptors – V.152-to-T.38 context – +ITU-T T.38 MGC controlled transitioning method – Step 5** + +| ITU-T H.248 encoding (shortened command) | Comment | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------| +|
 10) Modify Reply (MG to MGC): MEGACO/2 [11.9.19.70] ... Modify = ip/2/2/1, Modify = ip/8/3/2 { ; IP "T.38" Termination   Media {     Stream = 1 { ; there is just one Stream per Term.       Local{         v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"         c=IN IP4 12.9.4.6         ...         m=audio 40120 RTP/AVP 8 127         a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000         a=ptime:20       },       Remote{         v=0 ; Single Media Group "audio flow"         c=IN IP4 12.9.19.65         ...         m=audio 100 RTP/AVP 8 127         a=rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000         a=ptime:20       }     }   } } 
| | + +The two selected media formats for audio are identical at both terminations; there is thus not any audio transcoding enforced (when in audio state). + +It may be noted that the major portion of ITU-T H.248 signalling traffic is related to the ITU-T T.38 side, whereas the ITU-T V.152 termination is fairly simple and straightforward from a gateway control perspective. + +##### **II.4.2.2 V.152-to-T.38 context and ITU-T T.38 autonomous transitioning method** + +[ITU-T T.38] also defines an MG autonomous transition method for ITU-T H.248 controlled ITU-T T.38 bearer endpoints. + +# Bibliography + +- [b-ITU-T T.4] Recommendation ITU-T T.4 (2003), *Standardization of Group 3 facsimile terminals for document transmission*. +- [b-ITU-T T.6] Recommendation ITU-T T.6 (1988), *Facsimile coding schemes and coding control functions for Group 4 facsimile apparatus*. +- [b-ITU-T V.150.0] Recommendation ITU-T V.150.0 (2003), *Modem-over-IP networks: Foundation*. +- [b-ITU-T V.150.1] Recommendation ITU-T V.150.1 (2003), *Modem-over-IP networks: Procedures for the end-to-end connection of V-series DCEs*. +- [b-ITU-T V.151] Recommendation ITU-T V.151 (2006), *Procedures for the end-to-end connection of analogue PSTN text telephones over an IP network utilizing text relay*. +- [b-3GPP 29.332] 3GPP TS 29.332 (2009), *Media Gateway Control Function (MGCF) – IM Media Gateway (IM-MGW); Mn interface*. +- [b-ETSI ES 283 002] ETSI ES 283 002 (2005), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); PSTN/ISDN Emulation Subsystem (PES); NGN Release 1 H.248 Profile for controlling Access and Residential Gateways*. +- [b-ETSI TS 182 012] ETSI TS 182 012 (2008), *Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); IMS-based PSTN/ISDN Emulation Sub-system (PES); Functional architecture/IMS-based PES architecture; Ver. 2.1.4*. +- [b-IETF RFC 3264] IETF RFC 3264 (2002), *An Offer/Answer Model with the Session Description Protocol (SDP)*. + + + + + +## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.17-199102-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.17-199102-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c52e1cd455d9108a886784207d6bd3969ea675ad --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.17-199102-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,405 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# CCITT + +# V.17 + +THE INTERNATIONAL +TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE +CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE + +**DATA COMMUNICATION +OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +--- + +**A 2-WIRE MODEM FOR FACSIMILE +APPLICATIONS WITH RATES UP +TO 14 400 bit/s** + +**Recommendation V.17** + +--- + +![CCITT logo: a stylized globe with the letters CCITT inside.](6ed175c791b5e156d9c98a8dbcc3318c_img.jpg) + +CCITT logo: a stylized globe with the letters CCITT inside. + +Geneva, 1991 + +# FOREWORD + +The CCITT (the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CCITT is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The Plenary Assembly of CCITT which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study and approves Recommendations prepared by its Study Groups. The approval of Recommendations by the members of CCITT between Plenary Assemblies is covered by the procedure laid down in CCITT Resolution No. 2 (Melbourne, 1988). + +Recommendation V.17 was prepared by Study Group XVII and was approved under the Resolution No. 2 procedure on the 22 of February 1991. + +## --- CCITT NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication Administration and a recognized private operating agency. + +© ITU 1991 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## Recommendation V.17 + +# A 2-WIRE MODEM FOR FACSIMILE APPLICATIONS WITH RATES UP TO 14 400 bit/s + +## 1 Introduction + +This Recommendation defines the modulation methods and operating sequences for a modem intended only for use in high speed facsimile applications. + +Appropriate T-Series Recommendations should be consulted regarding operating procedures and other features employed in facsimile transmission applications, as these differ from those recommended for high speed modems for general applications. + +The modem has the following principal characteristics: + +- a) Provision for half duplex operation at data signalling rates of: + - 14 400 bit/s synchronous, + - 12 000 bit/s synchronous, + - 9600 bit/s synchronous, + - 7200 bit/s synchronous; +- b) Quadrature amplitude modulation with synchronous line transmission at 2400 symbols per second. +- c) Inclusion of data scramblers, adaptive equalizers and eight-state trellis coding. +- d) Two sequences for training and synchronization: long train and resync. + +## 2 Line signals + +### 2.1 *Carrier frequency* + +The channel carrier frequency is $1800 \pm 1$ Hz. The receiver must be able to operate with received frequency offsets of up to $\pm 7$ Hz. + +### 2.2 *Modulation* + +The modulation rate shall be $2400 \pm 0.01\%$ symbols per second. + +### 2.3 *Signal element codings* + +#### 2.3.1 *Signal element codings for 14 400 bit/s* + +The scrambled data stream to be transmitted is divided into groups of six consecutive data bits, which are ordered according to their time of occurrence. As shown in Figure 1/V.17, the first two bits in each group, $Q1_n$ and $Q2_n$ (where n designates the sequence number of the group) are first differentially encoded into $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ according to Table 1/V.17. + +![Block diagram of Trellis coding at 14 400, 12 000, 9600 and 7200 signalling rates. The diagram shows a Differential encoder and a Convolutional encoder. The Differential encoder takes inputs Q1n and Q2n and produces outputs Y1n and Y2n. The Convolutional encoder takes inputs Y1n and Y2n and produces outputs Y0n and Y1n. A Signal element mapping block takes inputs Q3n, Q4n, Q5n, and Q6n and produces outputs Y1n and Y2n. A table below the diagram shows the mapping from inputs a and b to outputs S1 and S2.](2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg) + +See Table 1/V.17 + +See Figures 2/V.17 to 5/V.17 + +| a | b | S1 | S2 | +|---|---|----|----| +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | + +Block diagram of Trellis coding at 14 400, 12 000, 9600 and 7200 signalling rates. The diagram shows a Differential encoder and a Convolutional encoder. The Differential encoder takes inputs Q1n and Q2n and produces outputs Y1n and Y2n. The Convolutional encoder takes inputs Y1n and Y2n and produces outputs Y0n and Y1n. A Signal element mapping block takes inputs Q3n, Q4n, Q5n, and Q6n and produces outputs Y1n and Y2n. A table below the diagram shows the mapping from inputs a and b to outputs S1 and S2. + +T1701600-92/d01 + +FIGURE 1/V.17 + +Trellis coding at 14 400, 12 000, 9600 and 7200 signalling rates + +TABLE 1/V.17 + +Differential coding for use with trellis coding + +| Input | | Previous outputs | | Outputs | | +|-----------------|-----------------|-------------------|-------------------|-----------------|-----------------| +| Q1 n | Q2 n | Y1 n-1 | Y2 n-1 | Y1 n | Y2 n | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | + +The two differentially encoded bits Y1n and Y2n are used as inputs to a systematic convolutional encoder which generates a redundant bit Y0n. This redundant bit and the six information-carrying bits Y1n, Y2n, Q3n, Q4n, Q5n and Q6n are then mapped into the coordinates of the signal element to be transmitted according to the signal space diagram shown in Figure 2/V.17. + +![Figure 2/V.17: A 128-point signal structure diagram for trellis-coded 14 400 bit/s data signalling. The diagram shows 128 signal points arranged in a cross-like grid pattern. The horizontal axis represents the in-phase component, labeled with angles 180° on the left and 0° on the right, and a scale from -8 to 8. The vertical axis represents the quadrature component, labeled with 90° at the top and 270° at the bottom, also with a scale from -8 to 8. Each point is marked with a dot and a 7-bit binary label (Q6n Q5n Q4n Q3n Y2n Y1n Y0n). Four specific points are highlighted with circles and letters: 'A' at (-6, -2) labeled 1111010, 'B' at (2, -6) labeled 0010010, 'C' at (6, 2) labeled 1100010, and 'D' at (-2, 6) labeled 1001010. The diagram includes a technical identifier T1701610-92/d02.](e0d425c8e4eef259e4c52d81426d93fa_img.jpg) + +Figure 2/V.17: A 128-point signal structure diagram for trellis-coded 14 400 bit/s data signalling. The diagram shows 128 signal points arranged in a cross-like grid pattern. The horizontal axis represents the in-phase component, labeled with angles 180° on the left and 0° on the right, and a scale from -8 to 8. The vertical axis represents the quadrature component, labeled with 90° at the top and 270° at the bottom, also with a scale from -8 to 8. Each point is marked with a dot and a 7-bit binary label (Q6n Q5n Q4n Q3n Y2n Y1n Y0n). Four specific points are highlighted with circles and letters: 'A' at (-6, -2) labeled 1111010, 'B' at (2, -6) labeled 0010010, 'C' at (6, 2) labeled 1100010, and 'D' at (-2, 6) labeled 1001010. The diagram includes a technical identifier T1701610-92/d02. + +*Note* – The binary numbers denote Q6n, Q5n, Q4n, Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n. A, B, C and D refer to synchronizing signal elements. + +FIGURE 2/V.17 + +**A 128-point signal structure used with the trellis-coded 14 400 bit/s data signalling rate** + +#### 2.3.2 Signal element codings for 12 000 bit/s + +The scrambled data stream to be transmitted is divided into groups of five consecutive data bits, which are ordered according to their time of occurrence. As shown in Figure 1/V.17, the first two bits in each group, $Q1_n$ and $Q2_n$ (where $n$ designates the sequence number of the group) are first differentially encoded into $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ according to Table 1/V.17. + +The two differentially encoded bits $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ are used as inputs to a systematic convolutional encoder which generates a redundant bit $Y0_n$ . This redundant bit and the five information-carrying bits $Y1_n$ , $Y2_n$ , $Q3_n$ , $Q4_n$ and $Q5_n$ are then mapped into the coordinates of the signal element to be transmitted according to the signal space diagram shown in Figure 3/V.17. + +![Figure 3/V.17: A 64-point signal structure diagram for 12,000 bit/s trellis coding. The diagram shows a constellation on a 2D plane with axes labeled in degrees (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) and numerical coordinates from -7 to +7. Points are labeled with 6-bit binary strings representing Q5n, Q4n, Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n. Four specific points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D for synchronization.](46f43cb4ffd47565e7c0ca306d461435_img.jpg) + +Detailed point data (X, Y, Label): +(-7, 7): 010100; (-5, 7): 010001; (-3, 7): 111110; (-1, 7): 000111 (D); (1, 7): 011100; (3, 7): 011001; (5, 7): 110110; (7, 7): 010111; +(-7, 5): 110101; (-5, 5): 110000; (-3, 5): 111011; (-1, 5): 000010; (1, 5): 100101; (3, 5): 100000; (5, 5): 110011; (7, 5): 010010; +(-7, 3): 011110; (-5, 3): 100111; (-3, 3): 001100; (-1, 3): 001001; (1, 3): 101110; (3, 3): 001111; (5, 3): 111100; (7, 3): 111001 (C); +(-7, 1): 011011; (-5, 1): 100010; (-3, 1): 101101; (-1, 1): 101000; (1, 1): 101011; (3, 1): 001010; (5, 1): 000101; (7, 1): 000000; +(-7, -1): 000100 (A); (-5, -1): 000001; (-3, -1): 001110; (-1, -1): 101111; (1, -1): 101100; (3, -1): 101001; (5, -1): 100110; (7, -1): 011111; +(-7, -3): 111101; (-5, -3): 111000; (-3, -3): 001011; (-1, -3): 101010; (1, -3): 001101; (3, -3): 001000; (5, -3): 100011; (7, -3): 011010; +(-7, -5): 010110; (-5, -5): 110111; (-3, -5): 100100; (-1, -5): 100001; (1, -5): 000110; (3, -5): 111111; (5, -5): 110100; (7, -5): 110001; +(-7, -7): 010011; (-5, -7): 110010; (-3, -7): 011101; (-1, -7): 011000; (1, -7): 000011 (B); (3, -7): 111010; (5, -7): 010101; (7, -7): 010000. + +Figure 3/V.17: A 64-point signal structure diagram for 12,000 bit/s trellis coding. The diagram shows a constellation on a 2D plane with axes labeled in degrees (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) and numerical coordinates from -7 to +7. Points are labeled with 6-bit binary strings representing Q5n, Q4n, Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n. Four specific points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D for synchronization. + +T1701620-92/d03 + +Note – The binary numbers denote $Q5_n$ , $Q4_n$ , $Q3_n$ , $Y2_n$ , $Y1_n$ , $Y0_n$ . A, B, C and D refer to synchronizing signal elements. + +FIGURE 3/V.17 + +**A 64-point signal structure used with the trellis-coded 12 000 bit/s +data signalling rate** + +#### 2.3.3 Signal element codings for 9600 bit/s + +The scrambled data stream to be transmitted is divided into groups of four consecutive data bits, which are ordered according to their time of occurrence. As shown in Figure 1/V.17, the first two bits in each group, $Q1_n$ and $Q2_n$ (where $n$ designates the sequence number of the group) are first differentially encoded into $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ according to Table 1/V.17. + +The two differentially encoded bits $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ are used as inputs to a systematic convolutional encoder which generates a redundant bit $Y0_n$ . This redundant bit and the four information-carrying bits $Y1_n$ , $Y2_n$ , $Q3_n$ and $Q4_n$ are then mapped into the coordinates of the signal element to be transmitted, according to the signal space diagram shown in Figure 4/V.17. + +![Figure 4/V.17: A 32-point signal structure for trellis-coded 9600 bit/s data signalling rate. The diagram shows a 32-point signal space diagram in a 2D plane with axes from -8 to 8. The points are labeled with 5-bit binary numbers (Q4n, Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n). Four points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D, representing synchronizing signal elements. The axes are labeled with angles 90°, 180°, 0°, and 270°. The diagram is identified as T1701630-92/d04.](a6a8016b231533e7f34b550f4676afc6_img.jpg) + +The diagram is a 32-point signal space diagram. The horizontal axis represents the real part and the vertical axis represents the imaginary part. The axes are labeled with angles: 90° at the top, 180° on the left, 0° on the right, and 270° at the bottom. The axes also have numerical labels: -8, -4, 4, 8 on the horizontal axis and 8, 4, -4, -8 on the vertical axis. The 32 points are arranged in a grid-like pattern. Four points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D. Point A is at (-4, -4), Point B is at (4, -4), Point C is at (4, 4), and Point D is at (-4, 8). The points are labeled with 5-bit binary numbers. The diagram is identified as T1701630-92/d04. + +Figure 4/V.17: A 32-point signal structure for trellis-coded 9600 bit/s data signalling rate. The diagram shows a 32-point signal space diagram in a 2D plane with axes from -8 to 8. The points are labeled with 5-bit binary numbers (Q4n, Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n). Four points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D, representing synchronizing signal elements. The axes are labeled with angles 90°, 180°, 0°, and 270°. The diagram is identified as T1701630-92/d04. + +Note – The binary numbers denote $Q4_n$ , $Q3_n$ , $Y2_n$ , $Y1_n$ , $Y0_n$ . A, B, C and D refer to synchronizing signal elements. + +FIGURE 4/V.17 + +**A 32-point signal structure for trellis-coded 9600 bit/s data signalling rate** + +#### 2.3.4 Signal element codings for 7200 bit/s + +The scrambled data stream to be transmitted is divided into groups of three consecutive data bits, which are ordered according to their time of occurrence. As shown in Figure 1/V.17, the first two bits in each group, $Q1_n$ and $Q2_n$ (where $n$ designates the sequence number of the group) are first differentially encoded into $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ according to Table 1/V.17. + +The two differentially encoded bits $Y1_n$ and $Y2_n$ are used as inputs to a systematic convolutional encoder which generates a redundant bit $Y0_n$ . This redundant bit and the three information-carrying bits $Y1_n$ , $Y2_n$ and $Q3_n$ are then mapped into the coordinates of the signal element to be transmitted according to the signal space diagram shown in Figure 5/V.17. + +![Figure 5/V.17: A 16-point signal structure for trellis-coded 7200 bit/s data signalling rate. The diagram shows a 4x4 grid of points in a signal space defined by angles 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° on the horizontal axis and values -6, -2, 2, 6 on the vertical axis. Each point is labeled with a 4-bit binary number (Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n). Four points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D, representing synchronizing signal elements. Point A is at (-6, -2) with label 0110. Point B is at (2, -6) with label 0101. Point C is at (6, 2) with label 0010. Point D is at (-2, 6) with label 0001. The text 'T1701640-92/d05' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.](3121afa7ca030b22ee0345864ca6f38b_img.jpg) + +Figure 5/V.17: A 16-point signal structure for trellis-coded 7200 bit/s data signalling rate. The diagram shows a 4x4 grid of points in a signal space defined by angles 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° on the horizontal axis and values -6, -2, 2, 6 on the vertical axis. Each point is labeled with a 4-bit binary number (Q3n, Y2n, Y1n, Y0n). Four points are circled and labeled A, B, C, and D, representing synchronizing signal elements. Point A is at (-6, -2) with label 0110. Point B is at (2, -6) with label 0101. Point C is at (6, 2) with label 0010. Point D is at (-2, 6) with label 0001. The text 'T1701640-92/d05' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Note – The binary numbers denote $Q3_n$ , $Y2_n$ , $Y1_n$ , $Y0_n$ . A, B, C and D refer to synchronizing signal elements. + +FIGURE 5/V.17 +A 16-point signal structure for trellis-coded 7200 bit/s data signalling rate + +### 2.4 Transmitted spectra + +With continuous binary ONES applied to the input of the scrambler, the transmitted energy density at 600 Hz and 3000 Hz should be attenuated by $4.5 \pm 2.5$ dB with respect to the maximum energy density between 600 Hz and 3000 Hz. + +## 3 Interchange circuits + +### 3.1 List of interchange circuits + +References in the Recommendation to V.24 interchange circuit numbers are intended to refer to the functional equivalent of such circuits and are not intended to imply the physical implementation of such circuits. For example, references to circuit 103 should be understood to refer to the functional equivalent of circuit 103 (see Table 2/V.17). + +TABLE 2/V.17 + +### **Interchange circuits** + +| Number | Description | +|----------|------------------------------------------------| +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | +| 103 | Transmitted data | +| 104 | Received data | +| 105 | Request to send | +| 106 | Ready for sending | +| 107 | Data set ready | +| 108/1 or | Connect data set to line (Note) | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready (Note) | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | +| 114 | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source) | +| 115 | Receiver signal element timing (DCE source) | +| 125 | Calling indicator | + +*Note* – This circuit shall be capable of operating as circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2. + +### 3.2 *Transmit data* + +The modem shall accept data from the facsimile control function on circuit 103; the data on circuit 103 shall be under the control of circuit 114. + +### 3.3 *Receive data* + +The modem shall pass data to the facsimile control function on circuit 104; data on circuit 104 shall be under the control of circuit 115. + +### 3.4 *Timing arrangements* + +Clocks shall be included in the modem to provide the facsimile control function with transmitter element timing on circuit 114 and receiver signal element timing on circuit 115. + +### 3.5 *Data rate control* + +This shall be provided by a connection between the modem and the facsimile control function; the nature of this connection is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +### 3.6 *Circuits 106 and 109 response times* + +After the training and synchronizing sequences defined in § 5, circuit 106 shall follow OFF to ON or ON to OFF transitions of circuit 105 within 3.5 ms. The OFF to ON transition of circuit 109 is part of the training sequence specified in § 5. Circuit 109 shall turn OFF 30 to 50 ms after the level of the received signal appearing at the line terminal of the modem falls below the relevant threshold defined in § 3.7. Following a dropout, after the initial handshake, circuit 109 shall turn ON 40 to 205 ms after the level of the received signal appearing at the line terminal of the modem exceeds the relevant threshold defined in § 3.7. + +### 3.7 *Circuit 109 threshold* + +- > –43 dBm ON. +- > –48 dBm OFF. + +The condition of circuit 109 between the ON and OFF levels is not specified except that the signal detector shall exhibit a hysteresis action, such that the level at which the OFF to ON transition occurs shall be at least 2 dB greater than that for the ON to OFF transition. + +Circuit 109 thresholds are specified at the input to the modem when receiving scrambled binary ONEs. + +Administrations are permitted to change these thresholds where transmission conditions are known. + +*Note* – Circuit 109 ON to OFF response time should be suitably chosen within the specified limits to ensure that all valid data bits have appeared on circuit 104. + +### 3.8 *Clamping* + +The DCE shall hold, where implemented, circuit 104 in the binary ONE condition and circuit 109 in the OFF condition when circuit 105 is in the ON condition and, where required to protect circuit 104 from false signals, for a period of $150 \pm 25$ ms following the ON to OFF transition on circuit 105. The use of this additional delay is optional, based on system considerations. + +## 4 **Scrambler and descrambler** + +The modem shall use a self-synchronizing scrambler/descrambler with the generator polynomial: + +$$1 + x^{-18} + x^{-23}$$ + +At the transmitter, the scrambler shall effectively divide the message data sequence by the generating polynomial. The coefficients of the quotient of this division, taken in descending order, form the data sequence which shall appear at the output of the scrambler. At the receiver, the received data sequence shall be multiplied by the scrambler generating polynomial to recover the message sequence. + +## 5 **Operating sequences** + +### 5.1 *Training and synchronizing sequences* + +Two separate sequences of training and synchronizing signals are defined in Table 3/V.17. + +The long train sequence is for initial establishment of a connection or for retraining when needed. + +The resync. sequence is for resynchronization after a successful long train. + +TABLE 3/V.17 + +**Training and synchronizing signals** + +| | Segment 1 | Segment 2 | Segment 3 | Segment 4 | | | +|------------|-------------------|---------------------------|---------------|----------------|-----------------------|-----------------------| +| | ABAB alternations | Equalizer training signal | Bridge signal | Scrambled ONEs | Total symbol interval | Approximate time (ms) | +| Long train | 256 | 2976 | 64 | 48 | 3344 | 1393 | +| Resync. | 256 | 38 | 64 | 48 | 342 | 142 | + +#### 5.1.1 Segment 1: ABAB alternations + +This segment consists of alternations between states A and B as shown in Figures 2/V.17 to 5/V.17. + +#### 5.1.2 Segment 2: equalizer training signal + +This segment consists of the sequential transmission of four signal elements A, B, C, and D as shown in Figures 2/V.17 to 5/V.17. + +The equalizer conditioning pattern is a pseudo-random sequence at 4800 bit/s generated by the $1 + x^{-18} + x^{-23}$ data scrambler. During segment 2, any differential quadrant encoding is disabled and the scrambled dibits are encoded as shown in Table 4/V.17. + +With a binary ONE applied to the input, the initial scrambler state shall be selected to produce the following scrambler output pattern and corresponding signal elements: + +TABLE 4/V.17 + +Encoding for four phase training signal + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 10 | 01 | 10 | 01 | +| C | D | C | D | C | D | C | D | C | D | C | D | B | D | B | D | + +Segment 2 + +| Dibit | Signal state | +|-------|--------------| +| 00 | C | +| 01 | D | +| 11 | A | +| 10 | B | + +#### 5.1.3 Segment 3: bridge signal + +This segment, which is used only during an initial long train, consists of a 16-bit binary sequence transmitted eight times. The sequence as defined in Table 5/V.17 is scrambled, and transmitted at 4800 bit/s using the signal elements A, B, C, and D as defined in Figures 2/V.17 to 5/V.17. + +TABLE 5/V.17 + +##### **Segment 3: Bit designations** + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----|----|----|----|----|----| +| B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | +| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | + +*Note 1* – The B0 bit is the first bit in the data stream as it enters the scrambler. + +*Note 2* – Any use of bits 4-6, 8-10, 12-14 would be for further study. Some existing equipment may set one or more of these bits to binary ONE; such bits shall be ignored. + +The dibits are differentially encoded as defined in Table 6/V.17. + +The differential encoder shall be initialized using the final symbol of the previous segment. The first two bits and subsequent dibits of each 16-bit sequence shall be encoded as one signal state. + +TABLE 6/V.17 + +##### **Segment 3: Dibit encoding** + +| Dibit | Phase change | Previous output/output | +|-------|--------------|------------------------| +| 00 | + 90 degrees | A/B, B/C, C/D, D/A | +| 01 | 0 degrees | A/A, B/B, C/C, D/D | +| 10 | 180 degrees | A/C, B/D, C/A, D/B | +| 11 | – 90 degrees | A/D, B/A, C/B, D/C | + +#### 5.1.4 Segment 4 + +Scrambled binary ONES shall be sent at the channel data bit rate. + +For the long train sequence, the differential encoder shall be initialized using the first symbol of segment 3. + +For the short train sequence, the differential encoder shall be initialized using the last symbol of segment 2. + +The convolutional encoder initial state shall be initialized to zero. + +The scrambler shall be clocked at the bit rate and the scrambler output sequence encoded as defined in § 4. The initial scrambler state is that state produced by the last symbol interval of the previous segment. + +The duration of segment 4 is 48 symbol intervals. At the end of segment 4, circuit 106 is turned ON and data are applied to the input of the data scrambler. + +Circuit 109 shall be turned ON during the reception of segment 4. + +### 5.2 *Turn OFF sequence* + +After an ON to OFF transition of circuit 105, the line signals emitted after remaining data or the end of the training check signal during retrain procedure have been transmitted are shown in Table 7/V.17. + +TABLE 7/V.17 +**Turn OFF sequence** + +| Segment A | Segment B | Total of segments | Approximate time | +|---------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------|------------------| +| Continuous scrambled ONEs | No transmitted energy | | | +| 32 SI | 48 SI | 80 SI | 33 ms | + +SI denotes Symbol intervals + +*Note* – If an OFF to ON transition of circuit 105 occurs during the turn OFF sequence, it will not be taken into account until the end of the turn OFF sequence. + +### 5.3 *Talker echo protection (TEP) signal* + +A TEP signal may, optionally, be transmitted prior to the transmission of training and synchronization sequences. The TEP signal shall consist of an unmodulated carrier for a duration of 185 to 200 ms followed by a silent period of 20 to 25 ms. + +When used, the TEP signal shall be considered as part of the training sequences. + +Alternative methods for achieving the intended benefits of a TEP signal are for further study. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.2-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.2-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11325da7183b015632d35ae9f122ddd6b43da768 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.2-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the top left corner. It features a stylized globe with the letters 'ITU' superimposed on it. A lightning bolt is depicted striking the globe from the top left. + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**V.2** + +# **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +## --- **POWER LEVELS FOR DATA TRANSMISSION OVER TELEPHONE LINES** + +## **ITU-T Recommendation V.2** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +## NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.2 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## POWER LEVELS FOR DATA TRANSMISSION OVER TELEPHONE LINES + +*(New Delhi, 1960; amended at Geneva, 1964 and 1980)* + +The objectives in specifying data signal levels are as follows: + +- a) To ensure satisfactory transmission and to permit coordination with devices such as signalling receivers or echo suppressors, the data signal levels on international circuits should be controlled as closely as possible, +- b) To ensure correct performance of multichannel carrier systems from the point of view of loading and noise, the mean power of data circuits should not differ much from the conventional value of channel loading (-15 dBm0 for each direction of transmission: see Note below). This conventional value makes allowance for a reasonable proportion P (dependent on the transmission systems and probably less than 50%; the value will have to be specified in subsequent studies) of the channels in a multichannel system being used for nonspeech applications at fixed power levels at about -13 dBm0 for each direction of transmission. + +If the proportion of nonspeech applications (including data) does not exceed the above value P, the mean power of -13 dBm0 for each direction of transmission would be allowable for data transmission also. + +However, assuming that the proportion of nonspeech circuits is appreciably higher than P (due to the development of data transmission) on international carrier systems, a reduction of this power by 2 dB might be reasonable (these values require further study). + +*Note* - The distribution of long-term mean power among the channels in a multichannel carrier telephone system (conventional mean value of -15 dBm0), probably has a standard deviation in the neighbourhood of 4 dB (see [2]). + +- c) It is probable that Administrations will wish to fix specific values for the signal power level of data modulators either at the subscriber's line terminals or at the local exchanges. The relation between these values and the power levels on international circuits depends on the particular national transmission plan; in any case, a wide range of losses among the possible connections between the subscriber and the input to international circuits must be expected. +- d) Considerations a) to c) suggest that specification of the maximum data signal level only is not the most useful form. One alternative proposal would be to specify the nominal power at the input to the international circuit. The nominal power would be the statistically estimated mean power obtained from measurement on many data transmission circuits. + +For these reasons, the CCITT + +*unanimously declares the following view:* + +### **1 Data transmission over leased telephone circuits (private wires) set up on carrier systems** + +1.1 The maximum power output of the subscriber's equipment into the line shall not exceed 1 mW at any frequency. + +1.2 For systems transmitting tones continuously, e.g., frequency-modulation systems, the maximum power level at the zero relative level point shall be -13 dBm0. When transmission of data is discontinued for any appreciable time, the power level should preferably be reduced to -20 dBm0 or lower. + +--- + +1) Recommendation V.2 corresponds to Recommendation H.15 [1]. + +1.3 For systems not transmitting tones continuously, e.g., amplitude-modulation systems, the signal characteristics should meet all of the following requirements: + +- i) The maximum value of the 1-minute mean power shall not exceed -13 dBm0. +- ii) Provisionally, the maximum value of the instantaneous power shall not exceed a level corresponding to that of a 0 dBm0 sine wave signal. This limit should be confirmed or amended after further study. +- iii) Provisionally, the maximum signal power determined for a 10-Hz bandwidth centred at any frequency shall not exceed -10 dBm0. This limit should be confirmed or amended after further study. + +*Note 1* - It is estimated that the proportion of international circuits which are carrying data transmissions is approximately 20%. If the proportion should reach a high level (approximately 50% or even less in the case of high-usage systems), the limits now proposed would need to be reconsidered. + +*Note 2* - Supplement No. 16 [3] of the Yellow Book, Volume III, gives information on the out-of-band power of signals applied to leased telephone-type circuits. + +### **2 Data transmission over the switched telephone system** + +2.1 The maximum power output of the subscriber's equipment into the line shall not exceed 1 mW at any frequency. + +2.2 For systems transmitting tones continuously, such as frequency- or phase-modulation systems, the power level of the subscriber's equipment should be fixed at the time of installation to allow for loss between his equipment and the point of entry to an international circuit, so that the corresponding nominal level of the signal at the international circuit input shall not exceed -13 dBm0. + +2.3 For systems not transmitting tones continuously, e.g. amplitude-modulation systems, the signal characteristics should meet all of the following requirements (see also Note 1 to § 1.3): + +- i) The maximum value of the 1-minute mean power shall not exceed -13 dBm0. +- ii) Provisionally, the maximum value of the instantaneous power shall not exceed a level corresponding to that of a 0 dBm0 sine wave signal. This limit should be confirmed or amended after further study. +- iii) Provisionally, the maximum signal power determined for a 10 Hz bandwidth centred at any frequency shall not exceed -10 dBm0. This limit should be confirmed or amended after further study. + +*Note 1* - In practice, it is no easy matter to assess the loss between a subscriber's equipment and the international circuit, so that § 2 of the present Recommendation should be taken as providing general planning guidance. + +*Note 2* - In switched connections, the loss between subscribers' telephones may be high: 30 to 40 dB. The level of the signals received will then be very low, and these signals may suffer disturbance from the dialling pulses sent over other circuits. + +If there is likely to be a heavy demand for international connections for data transmission over the switched network, some Administrations might want to provide special 4-wire subscriber lines. If so, the levels to be used might be those proposed for leased circuits. + +## **References** + +- [1] CCITT Recommendation *Power levels for data transmission over telephone lines*, Vol. III, Rec. H.51. +- [2] *Measurement of the load of telephone circuits*, Green Book, Vol. III-2, Supplement No. 5, ITU, Geneva, 1973. +- [3] *Out-of-band characteristics of signals applied to leased telephone-type circuits*, Vol. III, Supplement No. 16. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.21-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.21-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..471bf45a4bd75d5600686247362a82186f30ec4e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.21-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +# V.21 + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK --- + +## 300 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK + +### ITU-T Recommendation V.21 + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +### NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.21 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +© ITU 1988, 1993 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +### Recommendation V.21 + +## 300 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK1) + +*(Geneva, 1964; amended at Mar del Plata, 1968, +and at Geneva, 1972, 1976 and 1980, +and at Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984)* + +*Note* - The modem, designed for use on connections set up by switching in the general telephone network, can obviously be used on leased lines. + +A system of data transmission at a low data signalling rate, such that data could be transmitted over a telephone circuit operated alternatively for telephone calls and data transmissions, using simple input/output equipment and easy operating procedures, would be economical. + +The data signalling rate must be such as to allow the use of current types of data sources and sinks, especially electromechanical devices. + +The system for data transmission will be duplex, either for simultaneous two-way data transmission or for the transmission of signals sent in the backward direction for error-control purposes. The transmission must be such that use can be made of normal telephone circuits, and this applies both to the bandwidth available and to the restrictions imposed by signalling in the telephone networks. + +The two correspondents are brought into contact by a telephone call, and the circuit is put into the data-transmission position: + +- a) manually by agreement between the operators, or +- b) automatically. + +For these reasons, the CCITT + +*unanimously declares the following view* + +**1** Data transmission may take place at low data signalling rates on telephone calls set up on switched telephone circuits (or on leased telephone circuits). + +**2** The communication circuit for data transmission is a duplex circuit whereby data transmission in both directions simultaneously is possible at 300 bit/s or less. + +The modulation is a binary modulation obtained by frequency shift, resulting in a modulation rate being equal to the data signalling rate. + +*Note* - Attention is drawn to the fact that there may be in operation some old-type V.21 modems for which the maximum data signalling rate is 200 bit/s. + +**3** For channel No. 1, the nominal mean frequency is 1080 Hz. + +For channel No. 2, it is 1750 Hz. + +The frequency deviation is $\pm 100$ Hz. In each channel, the higher characteristic frequency ( $F_A$ ) corresponds to a binary 0. + +--- + +1) See Note under § 2 of this Recommendation. + +The characteristic frequencies2) as measured at the modulator output must not differ by more than $\pm 6$ Hz from the nominal figures. + +A maximum drift frequency of $\pm 6$ Hz is assumed for the line. Hence the demodulation equipment must tolerate drifts of $\pm 12$ Hz between the frequencies received and their nominal values. + +**4** Data may be transmitted by synchronous or asynchronous procedures. With synchronous operation, the modem will not have to provide the signals which would be necessary to maintain synchronism when transmission is not proceeding. + +**5** When echo control device disabling is required, it is recommended that the procedures specified in Recommendation V.25 be followed. + +**6** The maximum power output of the modem into the line shall not exceed 1 mW. + +The power level of the modem should be adjusted to make allowance for loss between this equipment and the point of entry to an international circuit, so that the corresponding nominal level of the signal at the international circuit input shall not exceed - 13 dBm0 (see Recommendation V.2, § 2). + +**7** a) When both channels are used for simultaneous both-way data transmission, channel No. 1 is used for transmission of the caller's data (i.e. the person making the telephone call) towards the called station, while channel No. 2 is used for transmission in the other direction. + +b) When one channel is used for data transmission and the other is used for transmission of check signals, service signals, etc., only, it is channel No. 1 which is used for transmission from the calling to the called station regardless of the direction in which the data are transmitted. + +c) The procedure for the assignment of the channels described under a) and b) above applies in the case of the general service of data transmission, making it possible to transmit data or check signal, service signal, etc., bilaterally between any two subscribers. In special cases which do not come under this rule, the procedure of assignment of the channels is determined by the prior agreement between the correspondents, bearing in mind the requirement proper to each service. + +## **8 Interchange circuits** + +**8.1** *List of interchange circuits essential for the modems when used on the general switched telephone network or non switched leased telephone circuits (see Table 1 /V.21)* + +The configurations of interchange circuits are those essential for the particular switched network or leased circuit requirement indicated. Where one or more of such requirements are provided in a modem, then all of the appropriate interchange circuit facilities should be provided. + +--- + +2)The nominal characteristic frequencies; + +channel No. 1 ( $F_A = 1180$ Hz and $F_Z = 980$ Hz); + +channel No. 2 ( $F_A = 1850$ Hz and $F_Z = 1650$ Hz). + +TABLE 1/V.21 + +| Interchange circuit | | General switched telephone network including terminals equipped for manual calling, manual answering, automatic calling, automatic answering
(Note 1) | Non-switched leased telephone circuits
(Note 1) | | +|---------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Number | Designation | | Point-to-point | Multipoint | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | X | X | X | +| 103 | Transmitted data | X | X | X | +| 104 | Received data | X | X | X | +| 105 | Request to send | - | X (Note 2) | X | +| 106 | Ready for sending | X | X | X | +| 107 | Data set ready | X | X | X | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | X (Note 3) | X | X | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready | X (Note 3) | X (Note 4) | - | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | X | X | X | +| 125 | Calling indicator | X | - | - | +| 126 | Select transmit frequency | - | - | X | + +*Note 1* - All essential interchange circuits and any others which are provided shall comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits indicated by X shall be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment and in the data circuit-terminating equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see § 9). + +*Note 2* - Circuit 105 is not required when alternate voice/data service is used on non-switched leased point-to-point circuits. + +*Note 3* - The circuit shall be capable of operation as circuit 108/1 - *connect data set to line* or circuit 108/2 - *data terminal ready* depending on its use. + +*Note 4* - In the leased point-to-point case, where alternate voice/data service is to be provided, circuit 108/2 may be used optionally. + +### 8.2 Response times of circuits 106 and 109 + +#### 8.2.1 Definitions + +8.2.1.1 Circuit 109 response times are the times that elapse between the connection or removal of a tone to or from the modem receive line terminals and the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 109. + +The test tone should have a frequency corresponding to the characteristic frequency of binary 1 and be derived from a source with an impedance equal to the nominal input impedance of the modem under test. + +The level of the test tone should fall into the level range between 1 dB above the actual threshold, of the received line signal detector and the maximum admissible level of the received signal. At all levels within this range the measured response times shall be within the specified limits. + +8.2.1.2 Circuit 106 response times are the times from the connection of an ON or OFF condition on: + +- circuit 105 (where it is provided) to the appearance of the corresponding OFF or ON condition on circuit 106; +- circuit 109 (where circuit 105 is not provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 106. + +#### 8.2.2 Response times + +TABLE 2/V.21 + +| | | | +|--------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------| +| Circuit 106 | | | +| OFF to ON | 20-50 ms (see Note 1) | 400-1000 ms (see Note 2) | +| ON to OFF | | ≤ 2ms | +| Circuit 109 | | | +| OFF to ON | ≤ 20 ms (see Note 1) | 300-700 ms (see Note 2) | +| ON to OFF | | 20-80 ms | + +*Note 1* - These times are used on leased point-to-point networks without alternate voice data facilities and on leased multipoint facilities. + +*Note 2* - These times are used in the general switched network service and on leased point-to-point circuits with alternate voice data. + +### 8.3 Threshold of data channel received line signal detector + +Level of received line signal at received line signal terminals of modem for all types of connection, i.e. general switched telephone network or non-switched leased telephone circuit: + +| | | | +|--------------|---------|-----------------| +| greater than | -43 dBm | circuit 109 ON | +| less than | -48 dBm | circuit 109 OFF | + +The condition of circuit 109 for levels between -43 dBm and -48 dBm is not specified except that the signal detector shall exhibit a hysteresis action such that the level at which the OFF to ON transition occurs shall be at least 2 dB greater than for the ON to OFF transition. + +Where transmission conditions are known on switched or leased circuits, Administrations should be permitted at the time of modem installation to change these response levels of the received line signal detector to less sensitive values (e.g. -33 dBm and -38 dBm respectively). + +### 8.4 Fault condition of interchange circuits + +See Recommendation V.28, § 7 for association of the receiver failure detection types). + +- 8.4.1 The DTE should interpret a fault condition on circuit 107 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. +- 8.4.2 The DCE should interpret a fault condition on circuits 105 and 108 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. +- 8.4.3 All other circuits not referred to above may use failure detection type 0 or 1. + +## 9 Electrical characteristics of interchange circuits + +Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendation V.28 is recommended together with the connector and pin assignment plan specified by ISO 2110. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that the long-term objective is to replace electrical characteristics specified in Recommendation V.28, and that Study Group XVII has agreed that the work shall proceed to develop a more efficient, all-balanced, interface for the V-Series application which minimises the number of interchange circuits. + +**10** The following information is provided to assist equipment manufacturers: + +- a) The nominal range of attenuations in subscriber-to-subscriber connections is from 5 to 30 dB at the reference frequency (800 or 1000 Hz), assuming up to 35 dB attenuation at the frequency 1750 Hz. +- b) The data modem should have no adjustment for send level or receive sensitivity under the control of the operator. + +## **Reference** + +- [1] CCITT Recommendation *Echo suppressors*, Vol. III, Rec. G.164. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9d75384a82d7c0ed7d993e9014c7ca66184adab --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f610f6b812ee9359f8b857acaa0e5561f4c41eb4ba47e1528700039473717f16 +size 112086 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a82802f8f1c398c138da7dcb3d8ef771a76b9bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:156746fa71ca117a24fa0b6f3d2b006847b52362fb7b2a692a8e1d8069a157f7 +size 7306 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/55a593259a0749ce342bd5eac2ba6b58_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/55a593259a0749ce342bd5eac2ba6b58_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0f23a993d2bdd33785ac4d295ee8b6d3838207b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/55a593259a0749ce342bd5eac2ba6b58_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:befe020e74c9bf097a8398d1e9262c5950ff1b710657edd86402b70efe5340dc +size 25202 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2570632734012806165d64ad48890aa717d60ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ca7046f787ca2b9fb203377c4e61e02027e7dfee0cb98f2fe13e060472cbf448 +size 78515 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cef2d2a8c2d28b6b92a253e1b14cf08157c63be2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5ad8adc868527c0891574050bc3226343a80ae67f2fdf9e4d88961dd2cb21085 +size 100034 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/86089bb74e9c313a8c62cd0cb41c3e66_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/86089bb74e9c313a8c62cd0cb41c3e66_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae6ce05beaf258ee4230bacf8cb661eab4d1b685 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/86089bb74e9c313a8c62cd0cb41c3e66_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:29a9950bd0806b270416c42fe846ae4dea14eb9e5e97fddfe8330d8f790a5d8f +size 22281 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c9fd175ef43773bdc27bc1dbf614b05a06cce54a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ad8fd30118f4ebaf1f89ec8373d03375210231c412651630c94bf49d8a7e91ec +size 108457 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0e0050aad6c5ccca4a57c4464311f232b3d1a5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:04632cdf4d88764e765588dd20dc3d8fa1f86f8291193fb62d5cdf180480992a +size 80611 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e3481192f1017cc5a41a626da85b8eddd0444f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,786 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +## V.22 + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK --- + +**1200 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM +STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL +SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK AND +ON POINT-TO-POINT 2-WIRE LEASED +TELEPHONE-TYPE CIRCUITS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation V.22** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +## NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.22 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +© ITU 1988, 1993 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## Recommendation V.22 + +## 1200 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK AND ON POINT-TO-POINT 2-WIRE RELEASED TELEPHONE-TYPE CIRCUITS + +(Geneva, 1980; amended at Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984; and at Melbourne, 1988) + +## 1 Introduction + +1.1 This modem is intended for use on connections on General Switched Telephone Networks (GSTNs), and on point-to-point circuits when suitably conditioned. + +The principal characteristics of this modem are as follows: + +- a) duplex operation on 2-wire GSTN and point-to-point leased circuits, +- b) channel separation by frequency division, +- c) differential phase shift modulation for each channel with synchronous line transmission at 600 bauds (nominal), +- d) inclusion of a scrambler, +- e) inclusion of test facilities. + +1.2 Recognizing the wide range of application, this Recommendation provides for three alternative configurations. The choice of alternative is a matter for the Administration concerned. The facilities given by the alternatives are: + +### *Alternative A* + +1200 bit/s synchronous + +600 bit/s synchronous (optional) + +### *Alternative B* + +| | | | +|----------------------------------|---|---------------------| +| 1200 bit/s synchronous | } | as in Alternative A | +| 600 bit/s synchronous (optional) | | | + +1200 bit/s start-stop + +600 bit/s start-stop (optional) + +### *Alternative C* + +| | | | +|----------------------------------|---|---------------------| +| 1200 bit/s synchronous | } | as in Alternative B | +| 600 bit/s synchronous (optional) | | | +| 1200 bit/s start-stop | | | +| 600 bit/s start-stop (optional) | | | + +An asynchronous mode having capability of handling 1200 bit/s start-stop and asynchronous data at up to 300 bit/s. + +The selection of the asynchronous mode is made during the handshaking sequence (see § 6). This gives compatibility between Alternative B and Alternative C. + +*Note* - The possibility of transmitting low speed anisochronous data in Alternatives A and B is left for further study. + +## 2 Line signals + +### 2.1 Carrier and guard tone frequencies + +The carrier frequencies shall be $1200 \pm 0.5$ Hz for the low channel and $2400 \pm 1$ Hz for the high channel. A guard tone of $1800 \text{ Hz} \pm 20$ Hz, to be transmitted only when the modem is transmitting in the high channel, may be disabled as a national option. An alternative guard tone of $550 \pm 20$ Hz may be incorporated as a national option. The question of international calls between countries requiring different guard tones is left for further study. + +### 2.2 Data and guard tone line signal levels + +The 1800-Hz guard tone shall be at a level of $6 \pm 1$ dB below the level of the data power in the high channel. The level of the optional 550 Hz tone is for further study. The total power transmitted to line shall be in accordance with Recommendation V.2 and shall be the same for transmission in either channel. Because of the 1800-Hz guard tone, the power level of data signals in the high channel will be approximately 1 dB lower than data signals in the low channel. + +### 2.3 Fixed compromise equalizer + +Fixed compromise equalization shall be incorporated in the modem. Such equalization shall be equally shared between transmitter and receiver. The characteristics of the equalizer shall be the responsibility of each Administration to recommend nationally. The possibility of producing compromise characteristics for international implementation is for further study. + +### 2.4 Spectrum and group-delay characteristic + +After making allowance for the nominal specified compromise equalizer characteristic, the transmitted line signal shall have a frequency spectrum equivalent to the square root of a raised cosine shaping with a 75% roll-off and within the limits of Figure 1/V.22. Similarly, the group delay of the transmitter output shall be within $\pm 150$ microseconds over the frequency range 900 Hz-1500 Hz (low channel) and 2100 Hz-2700 Hz (high channel). These figures are provisional. + +![Figure 1/V.22: Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized). The graph shows relative amplitude in dB versus carrier frequency in Hz. The y-axis ranges from -25 to 0.75 dB, and the x-axis ranges from -600 to 600 Hz. Two curves define the limits: a solid line and a dashed line. The solid line starts at -20 dB at -600 Hz, rises to -5 dB at -400 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls to -20 dB at 600 Hz. The dashed line starts at -20 dB at -550 Hz, rises to -5 dB at -450 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls to -20 dB at 550 Hz. The area between the two curves is shaded with diagonal lines. The text 'CCITT - 20321' is at the bottom right.](846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg) + +| Carrier frequency (Hz) | Relative amplitude (dB) - Solid line | Relative amplitude (dB) - Dashed line | +|------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| -600 | -20 | - | +| -550 | - | -20 | +| -450 | -5 | -5 | +| -300 | -2 | -2 | +| -200 | -1 | -1 | +| -125 | -0.5 | -0.5 | +| 0 | 0 | 0 | +| 125 | -0.5 | -0.5 | +| 200 | -1 | -1 | +| 300 | -2 | -2 | +| 450 | -5 | -5 | +| 550 | - | -20 | +| 600 | -20 | - | + +Figure 1/V.22: Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized). The graph shows relative amplitude in dB versus carrier frequency in Hz. The y-axis ranges from -25 to 0.75 dB, and the x-axis ranges from -600 to 600 Hz. Two curves define the limits: a solid line and a dashed line. The solid line starts at -20 dB at -600 Hz, rises to -5 dB at -400 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls to -20 dB at 600 Hz. The dashed line starts at -20 dB at -550 Hz, rises to -5 dB at -450 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls to -20 dB at 550 Hz. The area between the two curves is shaded with diagonal lines. The text 'CCITT - 20321' is at the bottom right. + +FIGURE 1/V.22 + +Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized) + +### 2.5 Modulation + +#### 2.5.1 Data signalling rates + +Alternatives A and B: The data signalling rate transmitted to line shall be 1200 bit/s or 600 bit/s $\pm 0.01\%$ with a modulation rate of 600 baud $\pm 0.01\%$ . + +Alternative C: In Modes i), ii), iii) and iv) (§ 4) the data signalling rates are as in Alternatives A and B. In Mode v), the data signalling rate transmitted to line shall be 1205.1 bit/s with a modulation rate of $602.5 \pm 0.5$ baud. Optionally in Mode v), the line rate shall be $1223 \pm 2$ bit/s with a modulation rate of $611.5 \pm 1$ baud. + +#### 2.5.2 Encoding of data bits + +##### 2.5.2.1 1200 bits per second + +The data stream to be transmitted shall be divided into groups of 2 consecutive bits (dibits). Each dibit shall be encoded as a phase change relative to the phase of the preceding signal element (see Table 1/V.22). At the receiver, the dibits shall be decoded and the bits reassembled in correct order. The left-hand digit of the dibit is the one occurring first in the data stream as it enters the modulator portion of the modem after the scrambler. + +TABLE 1/V.22 + +| Dibit values
(1200 bit/s) | Bit values
(600 bit/s) | Phase change
(Modes i, ii, iii, iv) | Phase change
(Mode v) | +|------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| 00 | 0 | + 90° | + 270° | +| 01 | - | 0° | + 180° | +| 11 | 1 | + 270° | + 90° | +| 10 | - | + 180° | 0° | + +*Note* - The phase change is the actual on-line phase shift in the transition region from the centre of one signalling element to the centre of the following signalling element. + +##### 2.5.2.2 600 bits per second + +Each bit shall be encoded as a phase change relative to the phase of the preceding signal element (see Table 1/V.22). + +### 2.6 Received signal frequency tolerance + +Noting that the frequency tolerance of the transmitter carriers is $\pm 1$ Hz or less, and assuming a maximum shift of $\pm 6$ Hz in the connection, the receiver shall be able to accept errors of at least $\pm 7$ Hz in the received frequencies. + +## 3 Interchange circuits + +### 3.1 Table of interchange circuits (Note 1 of Table 2/V.22) + +Essential and optional interchange circuits are listed in Table 2/V.22. + +TABLE 2/V.22 + +#### **Interchange circuits (Note 1)** + +| Interchange circuit | | Notes | +|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------| +| No. | Description | | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | Note 2 | +| 103 | Transmitted data | | +| 104 | Received data | | +| 105 | Request to send | | +| 106 | Ready for sending | | +| 107 | Data set ready | | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | Note 3 | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready | Note 3 | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | Note 4 | +| 111 | Data signalling rate selector (DTE source) | | +| 113 | Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source) | | +| 114 | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source) | | +| 115 | Receiver signal element timing (DCE source) | Note 6 | +| 125 | Calling indicator | Note 6 | +| 140 | Loopback/maintenance test | Note 7 | +| 141 | Local loopback | | +| 142 | Test indicator | | + +*Note 1* - All essential interchange circuits and any others which are provided shall comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits provided shall be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment and in the data circuit-terminating equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see § 3.5). + +*Note 2* - Some automatic calling equipments are designed to emit a calling tone to line by turning ON circuit 105 to the calling modem. The general switched telephone network (GSTN) constant carrier handshake is such that no calling tone will be emitted by the V.22 modem when used with these equipments. + +*Note 3* - This circuit shall be capable of operation as circuit 108/1 or 108/2 depending on its use. + +*Note 4* - This circuit is optional if only the 1200 bit/s speed [modes i) and ii) as defined in §§ 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3] is provided in the modem. If the 600 bit/s speed [modes iii) and iv)] is also provided, this circuit is essential. + +*Note 5* - When the modem is not operating in a synchronous mode any signals on this circuit shall be disregarded. Many DTEs operating in an asynchronous mode do not have a generator connected to this circuit. + +*Note 6* - When the modem is not operating in a synchronous mode, this circuit shall be clamped to the OFF condition. Many DTEs operating in an asynchronous mode do not terminate this circuit. + +*Note 7* - This circuit is for use with the general switched telephone network only. + +### 3.2 *Circuits 106 and 109 response times (see Table 3/V.22)* + +Circuit 106 response times are from the application of an ON or OFF condition on circuit 105. See also § 6 for operating sequences. + +TABLE 3/V.22 + +| | Constant carrier | Controlled carrier | +|--------------------|------------------|--------------------| +| Circuit 106 | | | +| OFF to ON | $\leq 2$ ms | 210 to 275 ms | +| ON to OFF | $\leq 2$ ms | $\leq 2$ ms | +| Circuit 109 | | | +| OFF to ON | 105 to 205 ms | 105 to 205 ms | +| ON to OFF | 10 to 24 ms | 10 to 24 ms | + +### 3.3 *Circuit 109 thresholds* + +High channel threshold: + +| | | | +|--------------|---------|-----------------| +| greater than | -43 dBm | circuit 109 ON | +| less than | -48 dBm | circuit 109 OFF | + +Low channel threshold: + +| | | | +|--------------|---------|-----------------| +| greater than | -43 dBm | circuit 109 ON | +| less than | -48 dBm | circuit 109 OFF | + +The condition of circuit 109 between the ON and OFF levels is not specified, except that the signal detector shall exhibit a hysteresis action such that the level at which the OFF to ON transition occurs shall be at least 2 dB greater than for the ON to OFF transition. + +Circuit 109 thresholds are specified at the input to the modem excluding the effects of the compromise equalizer. + +Circuit 109 shall not respond to the 1800-Hz or 550-Hz guard tones, or the 2100-Hz (nominal) answer tone during the handshake sequence. + +Administrations are permitted to change these thresholds where transmission conditions are known. + +### 3.4 *Circuit 111 and data rate control* + +Data rate selection may be by switch (or similar means) or by circuit 111 or a combination of both. + +The ON condition on circuit 111, where provided, shall select 1200 bit/s operation and the OFF condition shall select 600 bit/s operation. + +### 3.5 *Electrical characteristics of interchange circuits* + +Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendation V.28 is recommended together with the connector and pin assignment plan specified by ISO 2110. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that the long-term objective is to replace electrical characteristics specified in Recommendation V.28, and that Study Group XVII has agreed that the work shall proceed to develop a more efficient, all-balanced, interface for the V-Series application which minimizes the number of interchange circuits. + +### 3.6 *Fault condition of interchange circuits* + +(See Recommendations V.28, § 7 for association of the receiver failure detection types.) + +- 3.6.1 The DTE should interpret a fault condition on circuit 107 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. +- 3.6.2 The DCE should interpret a fault condition on circuits 105 and 108 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. +- 3.6.3 All other circuits not referred to above may use failure detection type 0 or 1. + +## 4 **Modes of operation over the DTE/DCE interface** + +### 4.1 *Alternative A* + +The modem can be configured for the following modes of operation: + +Mode i) 1200 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous + +Mode iii) 600 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous (optional). + +In these modes of operation, the modem shall accept synchronous data from the DTE on circuit 103 under control of circuit 113 or circuit 114. The data shall then be scrambled in accordance with § 5 and then passed to the modulator for encoding in accordance with § 2.5.2. + +In addition to standard V.24 transmitter timing arrangements, the modem shall provide capabilities to derive transmit signal element timing from receiver signal element timing. + +### 4.2 *Alternative B* + +The modem can be configured for the following modes of operation: + +Mode i) 1200 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous + +Mode ii) 1200 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------| +| (Mode iii) 600 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous optional | } optional | +| (Mode iv) 600 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character | | + +The synchronous modes are as given in Alternative A. + +In the start-stop modes, the modem shall accept a data stream of start-stop characters from the DTE at a nominal rate of 1200 or 600 bits per second. The start-stop data to be transmitted shall be converted, in conformity with Recommendation V.14, to a synchronous data stream suitable for transmission in accordance with § 4.1 + +Demodulated data shall be decoded in accordance with § 2.5.2, then descrambled in accordance with § 5 and then passed to the converter in conformity with Recommendation V.14 for regaining the data stream of start-stop characters. + +The intracharacter signalling rate provided to the DTE over circuit 104 shall be in the ranges given in Table 4/V.22 when operating in the basic or in the extended signalling rate ranges, respectively. + +TABLE 4/V.22 + +#### **Intracharacter signalling rate range** + +| Data rate | Signalling rate range | | +|------------|-----------------------|--------------------| +| | Basic | Extended | +| 600 bit/s | 600 to 606 bit/s | 600 to 614 bit/s | +| 1200 bit/s | 1200 to 1212 bit/s | 1200 to 1227 bit/s | + +### 4.3     *Alternative C* + +The modem can be configured for the following modes of operation. + +Mode i) 1200 bit/s ± 0.01% synchronous + +Mode ii) 1200 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character + +| | | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|----------| +| (Mode iii) 600 bit/s ± 0.01% synchronous optional
(Mode iv) 600 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character | } | optional | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|----------| + +Mode v) An asynchronous mode having capability of handling 1200 bit/s start-stop and anisochronous data at up to 300 bit/s. + +Modes i) to iv) are as given in Alternative B. + +#### 4.3.1    *Basic modes* + +In Alternative C, the modem shall incorporate Modes i), ii), iii) and iv) given in Alternative B, plus Mode v), in which the modem transmitter sends data at a rate always greater than the input data rate, and thus disables the receiver buffer. The GSTN handshaking sequence allows automatic selection of Modes ii) or v). Modes i), iii) and iv) must be selected at installation. On leased circuits there is no automatic mode selection. The line encoding for specific dibit values is described in Table 1/V.22. + +#### 4.3.2    *Transmitter* + +In Mode v), the modem shall accept a data stream of start-stop characters from the DTE at a nominal rate of a 0 to 300 bit/s or 1200 bit/s automatically. The transmitter buffer that converts incoming data to a synchronous data stream at 1205 bit/s or 1223 bit/s shall: + +- a)    start its asynchronous bit counter on either data transition, +- b)    always transmit the last bit received over circuit 103 after the bit counter has elapsed, +- c)    sample incoming data during the bit count at 1205 Hz or 1223 Hz depending upon line rate. + +This will assure that incoming data at 0 to 300 bit/s shall pass through the buffer with a maximum introduced distortion of 25% at 300 bit/s (and 12.5% at 150 bit/s), and that break signals pass through the buffer unchanged. + +The length and structure of incoming characters shall be the same as given in Alternative B. Within Mode v) at 1200 bit/s asynchronous, two adjacent character formats, e.g. 9- and 10-bit character, can be handled automatically. As in Alternative B, the modem shall derive its line signal clock from internal clock circuits, or alternatively, from receiver signal element timing, as an installation option. + +#### 4.3.3 Basic signalling rate range + +In Mode v), the intracharacter signalling rate provided by the DTE on circuit 103 must be: + +1205 bit/s line rate      0 to 301 bit/s and 1170 to 1204 bit/s + +1223 bit/s line rate      0 to 305 bit/s and 1190 to 1221 bit/s + +Selection of line rate is made in the transmitter by installer option and automatically detected in the receiver. + +## 5 Scrambler and descrambler + +### 5.1 Scrambler + +A self synchronizing scrambler having the generating polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ shall be included in the modem transmitter. The message data sequence applied to the scrambler shall be effectively divided by the generating polynomial. The coefficients of the quotients of this division, taken in descending order, form the data sequence which shall appear at the output of the scrambler. The scrambler output data sequence + +$$D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17}$$ + +where + +$D_s$ is the data sequence at the output of the scrambler + +$D_i$ is the data sequence applied to the scrambler + +$\oplus$ denotes modulo 2 addition + +$\cdot$ denotes binary multiplication + +Figure 2/V.22 shows a suitable implementation. + +To prevent occasional inadvertent instigation of remote loop 2 caused by scrambler lockup, circuitry shall be included to detect a sequence of 64 consecutive ones at the scrambler output ( $D_s$ ) and, if detected, invert the next input to the scrambler, $D_i$ . This circuitry will not operate during handshaking or during the instigation of remote loop 2. + +![Logic diagram of a scrambler implementation. The diagram shows a feedback loop where the output D_s is fed back through two delay elements (x^-14 and x^-17) and added to the input D_i to produce the output D_s. A detector monitors the output D_s for a sequence of 64 consecutive ones, and if detected, it inverts the input D_i. The diagram includes a 'Detector' block, a 'See Note 2' block, and a 'Detector' block. The output D_s is fed back through two delay elements (x^-14 and x^-17) and added to the input D_i to produce the output D_s. The diagram is labeled with the equation D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17} and the reference CCITT-28332.](55a593259a0749ce342bd5eac2ba6b58_img.jpg) + +$D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17}$      CCITT-28332 + +Logic diagram of a scrambler implementation. The diagram shows a feedback loop where the output D\_s is fed back through two delay elements (x^-14 and x^-17) and added to the input D\_i to produce the output D\_s. A detector monitors the output D\_s for a sequence of 64 consecutive ones, and if detected, it inverts the input D\_i. The diagram includes a 'Detector' block, a 'See Note 2' block, and a 'Detector' block. The output D\_s is fed back through two delay elements (x^-14 and x^-17) and added to the input D\_i to produce the output D\_s. The diagram is labeled with the equation D\_s = D\_i \oplus D\_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D\_s \cdot x^{-17} and the reference CCITT-28332. + +*Note 1* Marks (binary 1) and spaces (binary 0) at the V.24 interface correspond to ones and zeros, respectively, in this logic diagram. + +*Note 2* Circuitry shall be included to detect a sequence of 64 consecutive binary ones at the scrambler output ( $D_s$ ) and, if detected, invert the next input to the scrambler ( $D_i$ ). + +FIGURE 2/V.22 + +Scrambler + +5.2 *Descrambler* + +A self synchronizing descrambler having the polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ shall be provided in the modem receiver. The message data sequence produced after demodulation shall be effectively multiplied by the generating polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ to form the descrambled message. The coefficients of the recovered message sequence taken in descending order form the output data sequence $D_o$ , which is given by + +$$D_o = D_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17})$$ + +Figure 3/V.22 shows a suitable implementation. + +![Figure 3/V.22 Descrambler block diagram](86089bb74e9c313a8c62cd0cb41c3e66_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a self-synchronizing descrambler implementation. Input data $D_s$ enters a series of shift register stages labeled $x^{-1}$ . There are 17 stages in total. Taps are taken after the 14th stage ( $D_s \cdot x^{-14}$ ) and the 17th stage ( $D_s \cdot x^{-17}$ ). These two taps are combined in an XOR gate (circle with a plus). The result of this XOR operation is then XORed with the original input $D_s$ to produce the output data $D_o$ . A 'Detector' block monitors the input $D_s$ , and its output goes to a 'See Note 2' block which can influence the final output. The equation $D_o = D_i = D_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17})$ is shown below the diagram. The reference CCITT-28342 is in the bottom right. + +Figure 3/V.22 Descrambler block diagram + +*Note 1* - Marks (binary 1) and spaces (binary 0) at the V.24 interface correspond to ones and zeros, respectively, in this logic diagram. + +*Note 2* - Circuitry may be included to detect a sequence of 64 consecutive ones at the input to the descrambler ( $D_s$ ) and, if detected, invert the next output from the descrambler, ( $D_o$ ). This detector should not begin operating until the handshaking sequence is complete. If this circuitry is included, detection of the initiation signal described in § 7.1.1 (unscrambled binary ones) should be performed at the point $D_o$ . + +FIGURE 3/V.22 + +**Descrambler** + +**6 Operating sequences** + +6.1 *Channel and operating mode selection* + +On the general switched telephone network, the modem at the calling data station shall transmit in the low channel and receive in the high channel (call mode). The modem at the answering data station shall receive in the low channel and transmit in the high channel (answer mode). + +Where calls are established on the GSTN by operators, bilateral agreement between users on channel allocation will be necessary. On point-to-point leased circuits, channel allocation will be by bilateral agreement between Administrations or users. In these cases the method of selection of call or answer mode is a national matter. + +On point-to-point leased circuits, selection of Modes i) to v) will be by bilateral agreement between Administrations or users. The method of selection is a national matter. + +6.2 *V.25 automatic answering sequence* + +The V.25 automatic answering sequence shall be transmitted from the answer mode modem on international GSTN connections. The transmission of the sequence may be omitted on point-to-point leased circuits or on national connections on the GSTN, where permitted by the Administration. + +**Fascicle VIII.1 - V.22**       **9** + +### 6.3 Operating sequences for Alternatives A and B + +#### 6.3.1 GSTN - constant carrier + +The means of achieving initial synchronism between the call mode modem and the answer mode modem on international GSTN connections is shown in Figure 4/V.22. The alternative handshake without V.25 automatic answering is shown in Figure 5/V.22. + +![Timing diagram for GSTN handshake sequence showing Call mode and Answer mode modem signals and actions.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +**Call mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Silence > 400 ms + +Connect to line + +Wait $456 \pm 10$ ms + +Scrambled binary 1 + +Data + +Detect unscrambled binary 1 in $155 \pm 50$ ms + +107 + +Detect scrambled binary 1 in $270 \pm 40$ ms + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +109 + +106a) + +104 + +Clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +**Answer mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Silence $2150 \pm 350$ ms + +2100 Hz + +3300 $\pm$ 700 ms + +Unscrambled binary 1 and 1800 Hz + +75 $\pm$ 20 ms + +107 + +Detect scrambled binary 1 or binary 0 in $270 \pm 40$ ms + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +106a) + +109 + +Note – Binary 0 comes from Alternative C + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +a) Assumes circuit 105 has been turned on. + +CCITT-34630 + +The diagram illustrates the handshake sequence between a Call mode modem and an Answer mode modem. The Call mode modem starts with a silence period of more than 400 ms before connecting to the line. It then waits for 456 ± 10 ms before sending scrambled binary 1. The Answer mode modem receives this signal and detects unscrambled binary 1 within 155 ± 50 ms. It then sends scrambled binary 1, which the Call mode modem detects within 270 ± 40 ms. Both sides then wait for 765 ± 10 ms before sending data. The diagram also shows the timing for the 2100 Hz and 3300 Hz signals and the 1800 Hz signal. The sequence is labeled with circuit numbers 104, 106a), 107, 109, and 110. + +Timing diagram for GSTN handshake sequence showing Call mode and Answer mode modem signals and actions. + +FIGURE 4/V.22 + +Handshake sequence for Alternatives A and B (with V.25 auto-answering) + +![Timing diagram for V.22 Handshake sequence for Alternatives A and B. The diagram shows two scenarios: Call mode modem and Answer mode modem. It details the sequence of signals (Transmitted line signal, Connect to line), detection times for binary 1 (unscrambled and scrambled), and the resulting states of various circuits (104, 106, 107, 109).](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +**Call mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Connect to line + +Wait $456 \pm 10$ ms + +Detect unscrambled binary 1 in $155 \pm 50$ ms + +Scrambled binary 1 + +Detect scrambled binary 1 in $270 \pm 40$ ms + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +107 + +109 + +106a) + +104 + +Clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +**Answer mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Unscrambled binary 1 and 1800 Hz + +Scrambled binary 1 and 1800 Hz + +Data and 1800 Hz + +Connect to line + +Detect scrambled binary 1 or binary 0 in $270 \pm 40$ ms + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +107 + +106a) + +109 + +Note – Binary 0 comes from Alternative C + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +a) Assumes circuit 105 has been turned on. + +CCITT-34840 + +Timing diagram for V.22 Handshake sequence for Alternatives A and B. The diagram shows two scenarios: Call mode modem and Answer mode modem. It details the sequence of signals (Transmitted line signal, Connect to line), detection times for binary 1 (unscrambled and scrambled), and the resulting states of various circuits (104, 106, 107, 109). + +FIGURE 5/V.22 + +#### Handshake sequence for Alternatives A and B (without V.25 auto-answer sequence) + +##### 6.3.1.1 Call mode modem + +Once the call mode modem has connected to line, it shall be conditioned to receive signals in the high channel and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 in accordance with Recommendation V.25. The modem shall remain silent until unscrambled binary 1 is detected for $155 \pm 50$ ms, and after waiting for $456 \pm 10$ ms shall transmit scrambled binary 1 in the low channel. Upon detecting scrambled binary 1 in the high channel in $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall turn circuit 109 ON, then wait a further $765 \pm 10$ ms. Circuit 106 shall then respond to the condition of circuit 105 according to Table 3/V.22 constant carrier mode. When circuit 106 is OFF, circuit 103 shall be clamped to the binary 1 condition. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that in certain countries, for national purposes, modems are in service which emit an answering tone of 2225 Hz instead of unscrambled binary 1. + +##### 6.3.1.2 *Answer mode modem* + +Once the answer mode modem has connected to line and immediately following the V.25 answer sequence, the modem shall be conditioned to receive signals in the low channel. It shall then apply an ON condition to circuit 107 and transmit unscrambled binary 1. Upon detecting scrambled binary 1 or 0 in the low channel in $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall transmit scrambled binary 1 in the high channel, and after waiting for $765 \pm 10$ ms, apply an ON condition to circuit 109. Circuit 106 shall then respond to the condition of circuit 105 according to Table 3/V.22, constant carrier mode. When circuit 106 is OFF, circuit 103 shall be clamped to the binary 1 condition. + +Where both modems are manually connected to line this sequence will apply irrespective of whether the call or answer mode modem is connected to line first. + +After completion of the handshake sequence, any inadvertent loss and reappearance of the received line signal should not cause another handshake sequence to be generated. Circuit 109 should respond with the response times given in Table 3/V.22. + +#### 6.3.2 *GSTN and point-to-point leased circuits - controlled carrier* + +Once an ON condition has been applied to circuit 105 by the DTE, the modem shall transmit a synchronizing signal corresponding to binary 1 applied to circuit 103. The ON condition shall be applied to circuit 106, 210 to 275 ms after starting to transmit the synchronizing signal. The receiving modem shall establish timing and descrambler synchronization and then turn circuit 109 ON in 105 to 205 ms. + +Each direction of transmission shall be independently controlled. + +*Note* - Controlled carrier operation on GSTN is optional. For circuits with echo suppressors, controlled carrier working is not recommended. + +### 6.4 *Operating sequence for Alternative C* + +Refer to Figure 6/V.22. + +#### 6.4.1 *GSTN - constant carrier* + +##### 6.4.1.1 *Call mode modem* + +If configured for Modes i), iii), or iv), the handshake sequence proceeds as for Alternative B. If configured for Mode v), the handshaking sequence shall automatically select Mode ii) or v). This sequence shall be as follows: + +Once the call mode modem has connected to line, it shall be conditioned to receive signals in the high channel and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 in accordance with Recommendation V.25. The modem shall remain silent until unscrambled binary 1 [Mode ii)] is detected for $155 \pm 50$ ms and after waiting for $456 \pm 10$ ms shall transmit scrambled binary 0 [Mode ii)] in the low channel. Upon detecting scrambled binary 1 [Mode ii)] in the high channel within $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall turn circuit 109 ON, enter Mode ii), then wait a further $765 \pm 10$ ms. Upon detecting scrambled binary 1 [Mode v)] in the high channel in $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall turn ON circuit 109, enter Mode v), then wait a further $765 \pm 10$ ms. Circuit 106 shall then respond to the condition of circuit 105 according to Table 3/V.22 constant carrier mode. When circuit 106 is OFF, circuit 103 shall be clamped to the binary 1 condition. + +See also the note in § 6.3.1.1. + +##### 6.4.1.2 *Answer mode modem, Mode v)* + +Once the answer mode modem has connected to line and immediately following the V.25 answer sequence, the modem shall be conditioned to receive signals in the low channel. It shall then apply an ON condition to circuit 107 and transmit unscrambled binary 1 [Mode ii)]. + +If scrambled binary 0 [Mode ii)] is detected in the low channel for $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall enter Mode v), transmit scrambled binary 1 [Mode v)] in the high channel and after waiting for $765 \pm 10$ ms apply an ON condition to circuit 109. + +If scrambled binary 1 [Mode ii)] is detected in the low channel for $270 \pm 40$ ms, the modem shall enter Mode ii), transmit scrambled binary 1 [Mode ii)] in the high channel and after waiting for $765 \pm 10$ ms apply an ON condition to circuit 109. + +Circuit 106 shall respond to the condition of circuit 105 according to Table 3/V.22 constant carrier mode. When circuit 106 is OFF circuit 103 shall be clamped to the binary 1 condition. + +#### 6.4.2 *GSTN and point-to-point leased circuits* + +Controlled carrier operation as in § 6.3.2. + +##### **Call mode modem** + +![Timing diagram for Call mode modem handshake sequence. It shows the interaction between a Transmitted line signal and a Connect to line signal. The sequence includes detecting unscrambled binary 1 [mode ii] in 155 ± 50 ms, waiting 456 ± 10 ms, detecting scrambled binary 0 [mode ii], and then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem in 270 ± 40 ms. This leads to Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and Data [mode ii]. A wait of 765 ± 10 ms follows, then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode v] from Alternative C modem in 270 ± 40 ms, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] and Data [mode v]. Signal levels 107, 109, and 106a are indicated. A note '104 Clamped to binary 1' is present.](bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg) + +**Call mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Connect to line + +Wait $456 \pm 10$ ms + +Detect unscrambled binary 1 [mode ii] in $155 \pm 50$ ms + +Scrambled binary 0 [mode ii] + +Detect scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem + +In $270 \pm 40$ ms enter mode ii) + +Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] + +Data [mode ii] + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +Detect scrambled binary 1 [mode v] from Alternative C modem + +In $270 \pm 40$ ms enter mode v) + +Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] + +Data [mode v] + +107 + +109 + +106a) + +104 Clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +Timing diagram for Call mode modem handshake sequence. It shows the interaction between a Transmitted line signal and a Connect to line signal. The sequence includes detecting unscrambled binary 1 [mode ii] in 155 ± 50 ms, waiting 456 ± 10 ms, detecting scrambled binary 0 [mode ii], and then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem in 270 ± 40 ms. This leads to Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and Data [mode ii]. A wait of 765 ± 10 ms follows, then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode v] from Alternative C modem in 270 ± 40 ms, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] and Data [mode v]. Signal levels 107, 109, and 106a are indicated. A note '104 Clamped to binary 1' is present. + +##### **Answer mode modem** + +![Timing diagram for Answer mode modem handshake sequence. It shows the interaction between a Transmitted line signal and a Connect to line signal. The sequence includes detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem, then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and 1800 Hz in 270 ± 40 ms, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and Data [mode ii] and 1800 Hz. A wait of 765 ± 10 ms follows, then detecting scrambled binary 0 [mode ii] from Alternative C modem, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] and 1800 Hz and Data [mode v] and 1800 Hz. Signal levels 107, 109, and 106a are indicated. A note '104 Clamped to binary 1' is present.](7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg) + +**Answer mode modem** + +Transmitted line signal + +Connect to line + +Detect scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem + +In $270 \pm 40$ ms enter mode ii) + +Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and 1800 Hz + +Data [mode ii] and 1800 Hz + +Wait $765 \pm 10$ ms + +Detect scrambled binary 0 [mode ii] from Alternative C modem + +In $270 \pm 40$ ms enter mode v) + +Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] and 1800 Hz + +Data [mode v] and 1800 Hz + +107 + +109 + +106a) + +104 Clamped to binary 1 + +Binary 1 + +Data + +Timing diagram for Answer mode modem handshake sequence. It shows the interaction between a Transmitted line signal and a Connect to line signal. The sequence includes detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] from Alternative B modem, then detecting scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and 1800 Hz in 270 ± 40 ms, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode ii] and Data [mode ii] and 1800 Hz. A wait of 765 ± 10 ms follows, then detecting scrambled binary 0 [mode ii] from Alternative C modem, leading to Scrambled binary 1 [mode v] and 1800 Hz and Data [mode v] and 1800 Hz. Signal levels 107, 109, and 106a are indicated. A note '104 Clamped to binary 1' is present. + +a) Assumes circuit 105 has been turned on. + +CCITT - 34.651 + +FIGURE 6/V.22 + +Handshake sequence for Alternative C (without V.25 auto-answer sequence) + +## **7 Testing facilities** + +### **7.1 Test loops** + +Test loops 2 (local and remote) and 3 as defined in Recommendation V.54 shall be provided. Interface operation shall be as defined in Recommendation V.54. Instigation and termination sequences are not compatible with Recommendation V.54. + +#### **7.1.1 Instigation of remote loop 2** + +Signals controlling the application of remote loop 2 may only be transmitted after the synchronizing andshake has been completed. + +As in Recommendation V.54, the modems are referred to as modem A and modem B. + +When modem A is instructed to instigate a remote loop 2, the modem shall transmit an initiation signal of unscrambled binary 1. + +Modem B shall detect 154-231 ms of the initiation signal, and then transmit to modem A scrambled alternate binary ones and zeros (reversals) at 1200 bit/s (or 600 bit/s). + +Modem A shall detect 231-308 ms of scrambled reversals, cease transmission of the initiation signal, and then transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s (or 600 bit/s). + +Modem B shall detect the loss of initiation signal and activate loop 2 within modem B. + +Modem A, upon receiving 231-308 ms of scrambled binary 1 shall indicate to the DTE that it may begin sending test messages. + +#### **7.1.2 Termination of remote loop 2** + +When modem A is instructed to terminate a remote loop 2, the line signal shall be suppressed for a period of $77 \pm 10$ ms, after which transmission shall be restored. + +Modem B detects the loss of line signal in $17 \pm 7$ ms and detects the reappearance of the signal within $155 \pm 50$ ms, after which it returns to normal operation. + +### **7.2 Self tests** + +#### **7.2.1 Self test end-to-end** + +Upon activation of the self-test switch an internally generated data pattern of alternate binary ones and zeros (reversals) at the selected bit rate shall be applied to the scrambler. An error detector, capable of identifying errors in a stream of reversals shall be connected to the output of the descrambler. The presence of errors shall be indicated by a visual indicator. All generating interchange circuits except 114 (if used), 115 and 142 shall be clamped to the binary 1 or OFF condition. If circuit 113 is used, the DCE shall disregard this interchange circuit and use its internal clock. + +#### **7.2.2 Self test with loop 3** + +Loop 3 shall be applied to the modem as defined in Recommendation V.54. The self-test switch shall be activated and DCE operation shall be as in § 7.2.1. + +#### **7.2.3 Self test with remote loop 2** + +The modem shall be conditioned to instigate a loop 2 at the remote modem as specified in § 7.1. The self-test switch shall be activated and DCE operation shall be as in § 7.2.1. + +It shall be possible to perform the above tests (§§ 7.2.1, 7.2.2 and 7.2.3) with or without the DTE connected to the modem. These tests employ an internally generated data pattern that is controlled by a switch on the DCE. + +7.2.4 During any self-test mode, interchange circuits 103, 105 and 108 will be ignored. Note that self tests do not test asynchronous-to-synchronous converter circuits in either the transmitter or receiver. + +*Note* - Inclusion of remote loop signalling according to Recommendation V.54 is for further study. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50ef97e5b6928064c06086c8933a945e6964d30b --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:feab5f451a08be37e5500ab16c1517c738cce33bcc67b777ff1388f48c277279 +size 23059 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0aa4f6a10202da17d707c29ab7577fabbc0dcd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b225de0e99a85299a2dfddf4298a3674ab6fd7710c3c14a58aa33c19b4c31be7 +size 83652 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b68b673daf2f620e7e6c42b45943ff9e506b2aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0f4aee9e9b63ba2c96b4437986b775a33dedbe2df0b5e9a0b684a01f6231040d +size 133634 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..574ea1743d15ab8c92644a22e431f9a925f86bb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2137dcc6d8be15771eee918344967e310bc876a4f90f7248f472f82f68062f73 +size 7356 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aaabb7bc5c56d5ffee1c7c0bee73139f9ec00886 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fbc0431e0867cc5a32116fccda44e11d50939dfb2fe382b3be60dbd6c6a53f7b +size 123721 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/431b8889a0e7f676f0eef40859590349_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/431b8889a0e7f676f0eef40859590349_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8492a6b674cfd91557cdec18273762f24f4d9f2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/431b8889a0e7f676f0eef40859590349_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cecd060999e111640a150402ac04b034b3a6805fe7140f79e07ff4da7da53cf9 +size 23788 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/5a24ac755b962fd5f0183f13de0726de_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/5a24ac755b962fd5f0183f13de0726de_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1fe44d8b1b4b2e775cc4b7d95d36900624d7523c --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/5a24ac755b962fd5f0183f13de0726de_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:39ff1b162e3a648981f4af227878fa95516f41ba35678465ceff844b78cdbdc0 +size 22753 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5885e400285aee95f25057c06418652484ff0395 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d91f9f253fcec1abd9c946e60e6bfc21b20956f5d93bef92492273cb1a56176a +size 101806 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8825d083685d05079aa3264fdde7f380af55c74a --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5b5fdb5e302932b3d52dffb9e0f0e1d2f769af784464a34b5e1751d3e12f545e +size 91872 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcedead7ac820aa805fceeb06307f0c486039ba2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ee7cbf74e5a10186f2950f566cef81f22802e8157ed6d7ab1c1f390bcd3e1bea +size 122650 diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee2600843290f6c68eda6d444c6a442def485e71 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.22bis-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,809 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +***V.22 bis*** + +# **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** --- + +**2400 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM +USING THE FREQUENCY DIVISION +TECHNIQUE STANDARDIZED FOR USE ON +THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE +NETWORK AND ON POINT-TO-POINT +2-WIRE LEASED TELEPHONE-TYPE +CIRCUITS** + +**ITU-T Recommendation V.22 *bis*** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +## NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.22 *bis* was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## **2400 BITS PER SECOND DUPLEX MODEM USING THE FREQUENCY DIVISION TECHNIQUE STANDARDIZED FOR USE ON THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK AND ON POINT-TO-POINT 2-WIRE LEASED TELEPHONE-TYPE CIRCUITS** + +*(Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984; and at Melbourne, 1988)* + +The CCITT, + +*considering* + +(a) that there is a demand for data transmission at 2400 bit/s in the duplex mode over the General Switched Telephone Network (GSTN) and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits; + +(b) that there is a demand to have the fall-back mode compatibility with modems in accordance with Recommendation V.22; + +(c) that in this case the frequency division technique shall be used, + +*(unanimously) declares* + +that the characteristics of the modems for this service shall provisionally be as follows: + +## **1 Introduction** + +These modems are intended for use on connections on the GSTN and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits (see Note). The principal characteristics of these modems are as follows: + +- a) duplex mode of operation on the GSTN and point-to-point leased circuits, +- b) channel separation by frequency division, +- c) quadrature amplitude modulation for each channel with synchronous line transmission at 600 baud (nominal), +- d) inclusion of a scrambler, +- e) inclusion of an adaptive equalizer and a compromise equalizer, +- f) inclusion of test facilities, +- g) data signalling rates of: + - 2400 bit/s synchronous, + - 2400 bit/s start-stop, + - 1200 bit/s synchronous, + - 1200 bit/s start-stop, +- h) it is compatible with a V.22 modem operating in Modes i) or ii) at the 1200 bit/s signalling rate and includes automatic bit rate recognition. + +*Note* - In certain countries the use of such modems over the GSTN may not be allowed. + +## 2 Line signals + +### 2.1 Carrier and guard tone frequencies + +The carrier frequencies shall be $1200 \pm 0.5$ Hz for the low channel and $2400 \pm 1$ Hz for the high channel. A guard tone of $1800 \pm 20$ Hz, to be transmitted only when the modem is transmitting in the high channel, may be disabled as a national option. An alternative guard tone of $550 \pm 20$ Hz, to be transmitted only when the modem is transmitting in the high channel, may be incorporated as a national option. + +### 2.2 Data and guard tone line signal levels + +The 1800 Hz or 550 Hz guard tones shall be levels $6 \pm 1$ dB or $3 \pm 1$ dB, respectively, below the level of the data signal power in the high channel. Because of the 1800 Hz guard tone, the power level of data signals in the high channel will be approximately 1 dB lower than that of data signals in the low channel. + +### 2.3 Fixed compromise equalizer + +Fixed compromise equalization shall be incorporated in the modem transmitter. + +### 2.4 Spectrum and group delay characteristics + +The transmitted line signals, excluding the characteristics of the fixed compromise equalizer, shall have a frequency amplitude spectrum equivalent to the square root of a raised cosine shaping with 75% roll-off and within the limits shown in Figure 1/V.22 bis. Similarly, the group delay of the transmitter output shall be within the range of $\pm 150$ microseconds over the frequency ranges 900-1500 Hz (low channel) and 2100-2700 Hz (high channel). These figures are provisional. + +![Figure 1/V.22 bis: Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized). The graph shows Amplitude in dB on the y-axis (ranging from -25 to 0.75) versus Carrier frequency in Hz on the x-axis (ranging from -600 to 600). Two curves represent the upper and lower limits of the signal spectrum, showing a raised cosine shape with 75% roll-off. The upper curve starts at -20 dB at -600 Hz, rises to -4 dB at -300 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls back to -20 dB at 600 Hz. The lower curve starts at -20 dB at -550 Hz, rises to -9 dB at -450 Hz, peaks at -4 dB at 0 Hz, and falls back to -20 dB at 550 Hz. The area between the curves is shaded with diagonal lines. The x-axis has labels for -600, -550, -475, -450, -300, -200, -125, 125, 200, 300, 400, 450, 475, 550, and 600 Hz. The y-axis has labels for -25, -20, -15, -10, -9, -5, -4, -2, -0.75, 0, and 0.75 dB. The text 'CCITT - 28321' is at the bottom right of the graph area.](846242b2850d88b17a6d47cd9dd0ccbf_img.jpg) + +Figure 1/V.22 bis: Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized). The graph shows Amplitude in dB on the y-axis (ranging from -25 to 0.75) versus Carrier frequency in Hz on the x-axis (ranging from -600 to 600). Two curves represent the upper and lower limits of the signal spectrum, showing a raised cosine shape with 75% roll-off. The upper curve starts at -20 dB at -600 Hz, rises to -4 dB at -300 Hz, peaks at 0 dB at 0 Hz, and falls back to -20 dB at 600 Hz. The lower curve starts at -20 dB at -550 Hz, rises to -9 dB at -450 Hz, peaks at -4 dB at 0 Hz, and falls back to -20 dB at 550 Hz. The area between the curves is shaded with diagonal lines. The x-axis has labels for -600, -550, -475, -450, -300, -200, -125, 125, 200, 300, 400, 450, 475, 550, and 600 Hz. The y-axis has labels for -25, -20, -15, -10, -9, -5, -4, -2, -0.75, 0, and 0.75 dB. The text 'CCITT - 28321' is at the bottom right of the graph area. + +FIGURE 1/V.22 bis + +**Amplitude limits for transmitted line signal (unequalized)** + +### 2.5 Modulation + +#### 2.5.1 Data signalling rates + +The data rate transmitted to line shall be 2400 bit/s or 1200 bit/s $\pm 0.01\%$ with a modulation rate of 600 baud $\pm 0.01\%$ . + +#### 2.5.2 Encoding of data bits + +##### 2.5.2.1 2400 bits per second + +The data stream to be transmitted shall be divided into groups of 4 consecutive bits (quadbits). The first two bits of a quadbit shall be encoded as a phase quadrant change relative to the quadrant occupied by the preceding signal element. (See Figure 2/V.22 *bis* and Table 1/V.22 *bis*.) + +The last two bits of each quadbit define one of 4 signalling elements associated with the new quadrant (see Figure 2/V.22 *bis*). The left hand bits in Table 1/V.22 *bis* and Figure 2/V.22 *bis* are the first of each pair in the data stream as it enters the modulator portion of the modem after the scrambler. + +TABLE 1/V.22 *bis* + +##### Line encoding + +| First two bits in quabit (2400 bit/s)
or dibit values (1200 bit/s) | Phase
quadrant change | | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------| +| 00 | 1→ 2
2→ 3
3→ 4
4→ 1 | 90° | +| 01 | 1→ 1
2→ 2
3→ 3
4→ 4 | 0° | +| 11 | 1→ 4
2→ 1
3→ 2
4→ 3 | 270° | +| 10 | 1→ 3
2→ 4
3→ 1
4→ 2 | 180° | + +![Signal constellation diagram for CCITT V.22 bis, showing four phase quadrants with bit pairs and coordinates.](431b8889a0e7f676f0eef40859590349_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows a signal constellation for CCITT V.22 bis. It is a 5x5 grid of points centered at the origin. The horizontal axis has labels -3, -1, 1, 3. The vertical axis has labels 3, 1, -1, -3. The quadrants are labeled: Phase Quadrant 2 (top-left), Phase Quadrant 1 (top-right), Phase Quadrant 3 (bottom-left), and Phase Quadrant 4 (bottom-right). Bit pairs are assigned to the points: 11, 01, 10, 11 in the top row; 10, 00, 00, 01 in the second row; 01, 00, 00, 10 in the third row; and 11, 10, 01, 11 in the bottom row. The origin (0,0) is labeled 00. The reference CCITT-46140 is noted at the bottom right. + +Signal constellation diagram for CCITT V.22 bis, showing four phase quadrants with bit pairs and coordinates. + +FIGURE 2/V.22 *bis* +Signal constellation + +##### 2.5.2.2 1200 bits per second + +The data stream to be transmitted shall be divided into groups of 2 consecutive bits (dibits). The dibits shall be encoded as a phase quadrant change relative to the quadrant occupied by the preceding signal element (see Table 1/V.22 *bis*). The signalling elements corresponding to 01 in the signal constellation (Figure 2/V.22 *bis*) shall be transmitted irrespective of the quadrant concerned. This ensure compatibility with Recommendation V.22. + +### 2.6 Received signal frequency tolerance + +The receiver shall be able to operate with received frequency offsets of up to $\pm 7$ Hz. + +## 3 Interchange circuits + +### 3.1 Essential and optional interchange circuits + +These are listed in Table 2/V.22 *bis*. + +### 3.2 Circuits 106 and 109 response times + +After the handshaking sequences, circuit 106 will follow OFF to ON or ON to OFF transitions of circuit 105 within 3.5 ms. The OFF to ON transition of circuit 109 is part of the handshake sequence specified in § 6. Circuit 109 shall turn OFF 40 to 65 ms after the level of the received signal appearing at the line terminal of the modem falls below the relevant threshold defined in § 3.3. In the fall-back mode, the response time may be reduced to a value in the 10 to 24 ms range specified in Recommendation V.22. Following a dropout, after the initial handshake, circuit 109 shall turn ON 40 to 205 ms after the level of the received signal appearing at the line terminal of the modem exceeds the relevant threshold defined in § 3.3. + +### 3.3 *Circuit 109 threshold* + +High channel threshold: + +- greater than -43 dBm circuit 109 ON +- less than -48 dBm circuit 109 OFF + +Low channel threshold: + +- greater than -43 dBm circuit 109 ON +- less than -48 dBm circuit 109 OFF + +The condition of circuit 109 between the ON and OFF levels is not specified except that the signal detector shall exhibit a hysteresis action, such that the level at which the OFF to ON transition occurs shall be at least 2 dB greater than that for the ON to OFF transition. + +Circuit 109 thresholds are specified at the input to the modem when receiving scrambled binary 1. + +Administrations are permitted to change these thresholds where transmission conditions are known. + +Circuit 109 shall not respond to the 1800 Hz or the 550 Hz guard tones, or the 2100 Hz (nominal) answer tone during the handshake sequence. + +### 3.4 *Circuit 111 and data rate control* + +Data rate selection may be by switch (or similar means) or by circuit 111 or a combination of both. + +The ON condition on circuit 111, where provided, shall select 2400 bit/s operation and the OFF condition shall select 1200 bit/s operation. + +TABLE 2/V.22 *bis* + +#### **Interchange circuit (Note 1)** + +| Interchange circuit | | Notes | +|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------| +| No. | Description | | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | Note 2 | +| 103 | Transmitted data | | +| 104 | Received data | | +| 105 | Request to send | | +| 106 | Ready for sending | | +| 107 | Data set ready | Note 3 | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready | Note 3 | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | Note 4 | +| 111 | Data signalling rate selector (DTE source) | | +| 112 | Data signalling rate selector (DCE source) | Note 5 | +| 113 | Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source) | | +| 114 | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source) | | +| 115 | Receiver signal element timing (DCE source) | Note 6 | +| 125 | Calling indicator | Note 6 | +| 140 | Loopback/maintenance test | Note 7 | +| 141 | Local loopback | | +| 142 | Test indicator | | + +*Note 1* - All essential interchange circuits and any others which are provided must comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits provided must be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see § 3.5). + +*Note 2* - Some automatic calling equipments are designed to emit a calling tone to line by turning ON circuit 105 to the calling modem. The general switched telephone network (GSTN) constant carrier handshake is such that no calling tone will be emitted by the V.22 *bis* modem when used with these equipments. + +*Note 3* - This circuit shall be capable of operation as circuit 108/1 or 108/2 depending on its use. + +*Note 4* - This circuit is optional. + +*Note 5* - When the modem is not operating in a synchronous mode at the interface, any signals on this circuit shall be disregarded. Many DTEs operating in an asynchronous mode do not have a generator connected to this circuit. + +*Note 6* - When the modem is not operating in a synchronous mode at the interface, this circuit shall be clamped to the OFF condition. Many DTEs operating in an asynchronous mode do not terminate this circuit. + +*Note 7* - This circuit is for use with the general switched telephone network only. + +### 3.5 *Electrical characteristics of interchange circuits* + +3.5.1 Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendation V.28 is recommended together with the connector and pin assignment plan specified by ISO 2110. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that the long-term objective is to replace electrical characteristics specified in Recommendation V.28, and that Study Group XVII has agreed that the work shall proceed to develop a more efficient, all-balanced, interface for the V-Series application which minimizes the number of interchange circuits. + +### 3.6 *Fault condition of interchange circuits* + +See Recommendation V.28, § 7 for association of the receiver failure detection types.) + +3.6.1 The DTE should interpret a fault condition on circuit 107 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +3.6.2 The DCE should interpret a fault condition on circuits 105 and 108 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +3.6.3 All other circuits not referred to above may use failure detection types 0 or 1. + +## 4 **Modes of operation** + +The modem can be configured for the following modes of operation: + +Mode 1 2400 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous + +Mode 2 2400 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character + +Mode 3 1200 bit/s $\pm$ 0.01% synchronous + +Mode 4 1200 bit/s start-stop 8, 9, 10 or 11 bits per character. + +### 4.1 *Transmitter* + +4.1.1 In the synchronous modes of operation, the modem shall accept synchronous data from the DTE on circuit 103 under control of circuit 113 or circuit 114. The data shall then be scrambled in accordance with § 5 and then passed to the modulator for encoding in accordance with § 2.5. + +4.1.2 In the start-stop modes, the modem shall accept a data stream of start-stop characters from the DTE at a nominal rate of 2400 or 1200 bits per second. The start-stop data to be transmitted shall be converted in conformity with Recommendation V.14 to a synchronous data stream suitable for transmission in accordance with § 4.1.1 + +### 4.2 *Receiver* + +Demodulated data shall be decoded in accordance with § 2.5.2, then descrambled in accordance with § 5.2 and then passed to the converter in conformity with Recommendation V.14 for regaining the data stream of start-stop characters. + +The intracharacter signalling rate provided to the DTE over circuit 104 shall be in the ranges given in Table 3/V.22 *bis* when operating in the basic or in the extended signalling rate ranges, respectively. + +TABLE 3/V.22 *bis* + +#### **Intracharacter signalling rate range** + +| Data rate | Signalling rate range | | +|--------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| +| | Basic | Extended | +| 2400 bit/s
1200 bit/s | 2400 to 2424 bit/s
1200 to 1212 bit/s | 2400 to 2455 bit/s
1200 to 1227 bit/s | + +## **5 Scrambler and descrambler** + +### **5.1 Scrambler** + +A self synchronizing scrambler having the generating polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ shall be included in the modem transmitter. The message data sequence applied to the scrambler shall be effectively divided by the generating polynomial. The coefficients of the quotients of this division, taken in descending order, form the data sequence which shall appear at the output of the scrambler. The scrambler output data sequence shall thus be: + +$$D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17}$$ + +where + +$D_s$ is the data sequence at the output of the scrambler + +$D_i$ is the data sequence applied to the scrambler + +$\oplus$ denotes module 2 addition + +$\cdot$ denotes binary multiplication. + +Figure 3/V.22 *bis* shows a suitable implementation. + +To prevent occasional inadvertent instigation of remote loop 2 caused by scrambler lockup, circuitry shall be included to detect a sequence of 64 consecutive ones at the scrambler output ( $D_s$ ) and, if detected, invert the next input to the scrambler ( $D_i$ ) and reset the counter of 64 consecutive ones. This circuitry shall operate whenever the scrambler is operational. No scrambler initialization is required during the handshake or retrain sequence. + +![Block diagram of a scrambler implementation. The input data sequence D_i is fed into a feedback loop. A 'Detector' block monitors the output D_s for a sequence of 64 consecutive ones. If detected, it triggers an 'In-verter' block to invert the next input D_i. The output D_s is also fed back through two delay blocks, x^-14 and x^-17, and combined with the input D_i using modulo 2 addition (represented by circles with a plus sign). The equation D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17} is shown below the diagram. The reference CCITT-28332 is noted in the bottom right.](5a24ac755b962fd5f0183f13de0726de_img.jpg) + +$D_s = D_i \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D_s \cdot x^{-17}$ + +CCITT-28332 + +Block diagram of a scrambler implementation. The input data sequence D\_i is fed into a feedback loop. A 'Detector' block monitors the output D\_s for a sequence of 64 consecutive ones. If detected, it triggers an 'In-verter' block to invert the next input D\_i. The output D\_s is also fed back through two delay blocks, x^-14 and x^-17, and combined with the input D\_i using modulo 2 addition (represented by circles with a plus sign). The equation D\_s = D\_i \oplus D\_s \cdot x^{-14} \oplus D\_s \cdot x^{-17} is shown below the diagram. The reference CCITT-28332 is noted in the bottom right. + +*Note* — Marks (binary 1) and spaces (binary 0) at the V. 24 interface correspond to ones and zeros, respectively, in this logic diagram. + +FIGURE 3/V.22 *bis* + +#### **Scrambler** + +### 5.2 Descrambler + +A self synchronizing descrambler having the polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ Shall be provided in the modem receiver. The message data sequence produced after demodulation shall be effectively multiplied by the generating polynomial $1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}$ to form the descrambled message. The coefficients of the recovered message sequence taken in descending order form the output data sequence $D_o$ which is given by + +$$D_o = D_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17})$$ + +where the notation is as defined in § 5.1. + +Circuitry may be included to detect a sequence of 64 consecutive ones at the input to the descrambler ( $D_s$ ) and, if detected, invert the next output from the descrambler ( $D_o$ ). This detector shall operate whenever the descrambler is operational. + +Figure 4/V.22 *bis* shows a suitable implementation. + +![Block diagram of a descrambler implementation. The input D_s is split into two paths. One path goes through a series of delay blocks (x^-1) to produce D_s * x^-14 and D_s * x^-17. The other path goes through a 'Detector' block, which then feeds into an 'In-verter' block. The output of the 'In-verter' is D_o. The output of the descrambler is also D_o. The equation D_o = D_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}) is shown below the diagram. The reference CCITT-28342 is also present.](053f1077d592e6622cd21dc4bb4cb366_img.jpg) + +$D_o = D_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17})$ CCITT-28342 + +Block diagram of a descrambler implementation. The input D\_s is split into two paths. One path goes through a series of delay blocks (x^-1) to produce D\_s \* x^-14 and D\_s \* x^-17. The other path goes through a 'Detector' block, which then feeds into an 'In-verter' block. The output of the 'In-verter' is D\_o. The output of the descrambler is also D\_o. The equation D\_o = D\_s (1 \oplus x^{-14} \oplus x^{-17}) is shown below the diagram. The reference CCITT-28342 is also present. + +*Note* — Marks (binary 1) and spaces (binary 0) at the V. 24 interface correspond to ones and zeros, respectively, in this logic diagram. + +FIGURE 4/V.22 *bis* + +#### Descrambler + +## 6 Operating sequences + +### 6.1 Channel allocation and signalling rate selection + +#### 6.1.1 GSTN + +On the general switched telephone network, the modem at the calling data station shall transmit in the low channel and receive in the high channel (call mode). The modem at the answering data station shall receive in the low channel and transmit in the high channel (answer mode). + +In some situations however, such as when calls are established on the GSTN by operators, bilateral agreement on channel allocations will be necessary. + +Signalling rate selection at the call mode modem shall be either manual or by means of a logical condition applied on circuit 111 (if this circuit is provided). The handshake sequence, as defined in § 6.3.1, allows each modem to automatically condition itself to operate at the correct signalling rate. + +#### 6.1.2 Point-to-point leased circuits + +Channel allocation and signalling rate selection on point-to-point leased circuits will, in general, be by bilateral agreement between users. + +### 6.2 V.25 automatic answering sequence + +The V.25 automatic answering sequence shall be transmitted from the answer mode modem on international GSTN connections. The transmission of the sequence may be omitted in national connections on point-to-point leased circuits or on the GSTN, where permitted by the Administrations. + +### 6.3 *Handshake sequence* + +#### 6.3.1 *GSTN* + +The means of achieving synchronism between the calling modem and the answering modem on international GSTN connections is shown in Figures 5/V.22 *bis*, 6/V.22 *bis* and 7/V.22 *bis*. Both calling and answering modems shall be manually conditioned to operate either in the synchronous modes (Modes 1 and 3), or in the start-stop modes (Modes 2 and 4). If both calling and answering modems are V.22 *bis* modems, the handshake will normally condition both modems to operate at 2400 bit/s. If however one or both of the modems has been set to operate at 1200 bit/s, either manually or via circuit 111, then the handshake will condition both modems to operate at 1200 bit/s. If either the calling or answering modem is a V.22 modem operating in V.22 Modes i) or ii) the handshake will condition both the V.22 *bis* and V.22 modem to operate at 1200 bit/s. The signalling rate is communicated to the DTE by a logical condition on circuit 112. The handshake sequence is independent of which modem, calling or answering, is connected to line first. + +##### 6.3.1.1 *Interworking at 2400 bit/s* + +###### 6.3.1.1.1 *Calling modem* + +- a) On connection to line the calling modem shall be conditioned to receive signals in the high channel at 1200 bit/s and transmit signals in the low channel at 1200 bit/s in accordance with § 2.5.2.2. It shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 in accordance with Recommendation V.25. The modem shall initially remain silent. +- b) After $155 \pm 10$ ms of unscrambled binary 1 has been detected, the modem shall remain silent for a further $456 \pm 10$ ms then transmit an unscrambled repetitive double dibit pattern of 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3$ ms. Following this signal the modem shall transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. +- c) If the modem detects scrambled binary 1 in the high channel at 1200 bit/s for $270 \pm 40$ ms, the handshake shall continue in accordance with §§ 6.3.1.2.1 c) and d). However, if unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s is detected in the high channel, then at the end of receipt of this signal the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 112. +- d) $600 \pm 10$ ms after circuit 112 has been turned ON the modem shall begin transmitting scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and $450 \pm 10$ ms after circuit 112 has been turned ON the receiver may begin making 16-way decisions. +- e) Following transmission of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s for $200 \pm 10$ ms, circuit 106 shall be conditioned to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data at 2400 bit/s. +- f) When 32 consecutive bits of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s have been detected in the high channel the modem shall be ready to receive data at 2400 bit/s and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 109. + +###### 6.3.1.1.2 *Answering modem* + +- a) On connection to line the answering modem shall be conditioned to transmit signals in the high channel at 1200 bit/s in accordance with § 2.5.2.2 and receive signals in the low channel at 1200 bit/s. Following transmission of the answer sequence in accordance with Recommendation V.25, the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 and then transmit unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. +- b) If the modem detects scrambled binary 1 or 0 in the low channel at 1200 bit/s for $270 \pm 40$ ms, the handshake shall continue in accordance with §§ 6.3.1.2.2 b) and c). However, if unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s is detected in the low channel, at the end of receipt of this signal the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 112 and then transmit an unscrambled repetitive double dibit pattern of 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3$ ms. Following these signals the modem shall transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. +- c) $600 \pm 10$ ms after circuit 112 has been turned ON the modem shall begin transmitting scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and $450 \pm 10$ ms after circuit 112 has been turned ON the receiver may begin making 16-way decisions. +- d) Following transmission of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s for $200 \pm 10$ ms, circuit 106 shall be conditioned to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data at 2400 bit/s. +- e) When 32 consecutive bits of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s have been detected in the low channel the modem shall be ready to receive data at 2400 bit/s and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 109. + +![Timing diagram for V.22 bis signal handshake sequence at 2400 bit/s with V.25 automatic answering. The diagram shows the interaction between a Calling modem and an Answering modem. The Calling modem sends S1, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and Data. The Answering modem receives these and responds with Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, S1, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and Data. Key timing points include: 456 ms ± 10 ms for detecting unscrambled binary 1, 600 ms ± 10 ms for detecting end of S1 signal, and 200 ms ± 10 ms for detecting 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s. Signal levels 106, 107, 109, and 112 are indicated.](d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg) + +**Calling modem** + +Connect to line + +S1 + +Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s + +Data + +$456\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +$100 \pm 3\text{ ms}$ + +$600\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +$200\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Detect unscrambled binary 1 in $155 \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +107 + +112 + +$450 \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Begin 16-way decisions in receiver + +Detect end of S1 signal in upper channel + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +109 + +104 unclamped (binary 1) + +Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s + +106 + +**Answering modem** + +Connect to line + +2100 Hz for $3300 \pm 700\text{ ms}$ + +Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +S1 + +Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s + +Data + +Silence $2150 \pm 350\text{ ms}$ + +$75\text{ ms } \pm 20\text{ ms}$ + +$100 \pm 3\text{ms}$ + +$600\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +$200\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s + +106 + +107 + +112 + +$450 \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Begin 16-way decisions in receiver + +Detect end of S1 signal in lower channel + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +109 + +104 unclamped (binary) + +Data + +CCITT-01200 + +**V.22 bis signal:** +S1 = Unscrambled double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3\text{ ms}$ . + +Timing diagram for V.22 bis signal handshake sequence at 2400 bit/s with V.25 automatic answering. The diagram shows the interaction between a Calling modem and an Answering modem. The Calling modem sends S1, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and Data. The Answering modem receives these and responds with Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, S1, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s, and Data. Key timing points include: 456 ms ± 10 ms for detecting unscrambled binary 1, 600 ms ± 10 ms for detecting end of S1 signal, and 200 ms ± 10 ms for detecting 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s. Signal levels 106, 107, 109, and 112 are indicated. + +FIGURE 5/V.22 bis + +###### Handshake sequence at 2400 bit/s (with V.25 automatic answering) + +![Timing diagram for V.22 calling modem handshake sequence at 1200 bit/s with V.25 automatic answering. The diagram shows the interaction between a V.22 calling modem and a V.22 bis answering modem. The V.22 calling modem sends Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s and Data. The V.22 bis answering modem receives these and responds with Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, and Data. Key timing points include: 456 ms ± 10 ms for detecting unscrambled binary 1, 765 ms ± 10 ms for detecting scrambled binary 1 or binary 0, and 75 ms ± 20 ms for detecting scrambled binary 1 or binary 0. Signal levels 106, 107, 109, and 112 are indicated.](27b06ec9f42b5d727a2630f61a5f1861_img.jpg) + +**V.22 calling modem** + +Connect to line + +Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +Data + +$456\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +$765\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Detect unscrambled binary 1 in $155 \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +107 + +Detect scrambled binary 1 in $270 \pm 40\text{ ms}$ + +109 + +106 + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 unclamped (binary 1) + +Data + +**V.22 bis answering modem** + +Connect to line + +2100 Hz for $3300 \pm 700\text{ ms}$ + +Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s + +Data + +Silence $2150 \pm 350\text{ ms}$ + +$75\text{ ms } \pm 20\text{ ms}$ + +$765\text{ ms } \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +Detect scrambled binary 1 or binary 0 in $270 \pm 10\text{ ms}$ + +107 + +112 + +106 + +109 + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 unclamped (binary 1) + +Data + +CCITT - 65330 + +Timing diagram for V.22 calling modem handshake sequence at 1200 bit/s with V.25 automatic answering. The diagram shows the interaction between a V.22 calling modem and a V.22 bis answering modem. The V.22 calling modem sends Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s and Data. The V.22 bis answering modem receives these and responds with Unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s, and Data. Key timing points include: 456 ms ± 10 ms for detecting unscrambled binary 1, 765 ms ± 10 ms for detecting scrambled binary 1 or binary 0, and 75 ms ± 20 ms for detecting scrambled binary 1 or binary 0. Signal levels 106, 107, 109, and 112 are indicated. + +FIGURE 6/V.22 bis + +###### Handshake sequence at 1200 bit/s with V.22 calling modem (with V.25 automatic answering) + +![Timing diagram for V.22 bis calling modem handshake sequence. The diagram shows the sequence of events between a calling modem and an answering modem. The calling modem starts with a 'Connect to line' signal, followed by a period of silence (2150 ± 350 ms). It then transmits 'S1' (Unscrambled double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for 100 ± 3 ms). The answering modem detects 'S1' and transmits '2100 Hz for 3300 ± 700ms'. The calling modem then transmits 'Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s' for 765 ms ± 10 ms. The answering modem detects this and transmits 'Data'. The calling modem then transmits 'Data'.](af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg) + +**V.22 bis calling modem** + +**V.22 answering modem** + +**V.22 bis signal:** + S1 = Unscrambled double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for 100 ± 3 ms. + +CCITT - 65341 + +Timing diagram for V.22 bis calling modem handshake sequence. The diagram shows the sequence of events between a calling modem and an answering modem. The calling modem starts with a 'Connect to line' signal, followed by a period of silence (2150 ± 350 ms). It then transmits 'S1' (Unscrambled double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for 100 ± 3 ms). The answering modem detects 'S1' and transmits '2100 Hz for 3300 ± 700ms'. The calling modem then transmits 'Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s' for 765 ms ± 10 ms. The answering modem detects this and transmits 'Data'. The calling modem then transmits 'Data'. + +FIGURE 7/V.22 bis + +###### Handshake sequence at 1200 bit/s with V.22 answering modem (with V.25 automatic answering) + +##### 6.3.1.2 Interworking at 1200 bit/s + +The following handshake is identical to the Recommendation V.22 alternative A and B handshake. + +###### 6.3.1.2.1 Calling modem + +- On connection to line the calling modem shall be conditioned to receive signals in the high channel at 1200 bit/s and transmit signals in the low channel at 1200 bit/s in accordance with § 2.5.2.2. It shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 in accordance with Recommendation V.25. The modem shall initially remain silent. +- After 155 ± 10 ms of unscrambled binary 1 has been detected, the modem shall remain silent for a further 456 ± 10 ms then transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s (a preceding V.22 bis signal, as shown in Figure 7/V.22 bis, would not affect the operation of a V.22 answer modem). +- On detection of scrambled binary 1 in the high channel at 1200 bit/s for 270 ± 40 ms the modem shall be ready to receive data at 1200 bit/s and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 109 and an OFF condition to circuit 112. +- 765 ± 10 ms after circuit 109 has been turned ON, circuit 106 shall be conditioned to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data at 1200 bit/s. + +###### 6.3.1.2.2 *Answering modem* + +- a) On connection to line the answering modem shall be conditioned to transmit signals in the high channel at 1200 bit/s in accordance with § 2.5.2.2 and receive signals in the low channel at 1200 bit/s. + +Following transmission of the answer sequence in accordance with V.25 the modem shall apply an ON condition to circuit 107 and then transmit unscrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. + +- b) On detection of scrambled binary 1 or 0 in the low channel at 1200 bit/s for $270 \pm 40$ ms the modem shall apply an OFF condition to circuit 112 and shall then transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. +- c) After scrambled binary 1 has been transmitted at 1200 bit/s for $765 \pm 10$ ms the modem shall be ready to transmit and receive data at 1200 bit/s, shall condition circuit 106 to respond to circuit 105 and shall apply an ON condition to circuit 109. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that in certain countries, for national purposes, modems are in service which emit an answering tone of 2225 Hz instead of unscrambled binary 1. + +#### 6.3.2 *Point-to-point leased circuits* + +##### 6.3.2.1 *Interworking at 2400 bit/s* + +Operation on leased circuits shall be continuous carrier in both directions. On initial power on and after line signal interruptions, operation shall be according to § 6.5. + +### 6.4 *Retrain sequence (2400 bit/s operation)* + +A retrain may be initiated during data transmission between two V.22 *bis* modems if either modem incorporates a means of detecting loss of equalization. + +Transmission of a retrain sequence shall be initiated either by detection of loss of equalization or by detection of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem. + +The following sequence of events shall take place during the retrain: + +- a) Following detection of loss of equalization or the end of detection of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the OFF condition shall be applied to circuit 106 and circuit 104 may be clamped to binary 1. The modem shall transmit an unscrambled repetitive double dibit pattern of 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3$ ms. Following this signal the modem shall transmit scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s. +- b) $600 \pm 10$ ms after the end of detection of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the modem shall begin transmitting scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s and $450 \pm 10$ ms after the end of this detection the receiver may begin making 16-way decisions. +- c) Following transmission of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s for $200 \pm 10$ ms, circuit 106 shall be conditioned to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data at 2400 bit/s. +- d) When 32 consecutive bits of scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s have been detected from the remote modem, the modem shall be ready to receive data at 2400 bit/s and shall remove the clamp from circuit 104. + +A retrain between two modems is shown in Figure 8/V.22 *bis*. Clocks presented on circuits 114 and 115 shall remain at 2400 bit/s during the entire retrain sequence. + +If a modem has transmitted a retrain signal and has not received unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s immediately prior, or during, or within a time interval equal to the maximum expected two-way propagation delay, the modem shall return to the beginning of the retrain signal as defined above and repeat the procedure until unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 is received from the remote modem. A time interval of 1.2 seconds is recommended for the maximum expected two-way propagation delay. + +If the modem fails to synchronize on the received retrain sequence, the modem shall transmit another retrain signal. + +During this retraining, circuits 109 and 107 shall remain ON. + +![](33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg) + +Modem 1 + +| Data | S1 | Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s | Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s | Data | +|-----------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| | $100 \pm 3 \text{ ms}$ | $600 \text{ ms} \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | $200 \text{ ms} \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | | +| | 106 | Detect end of S1 signal in channel 2 | | 106 | +| | | $450 \text{ ms} \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | | | +| | | Begin 16-way decisions in receiver | | | +| Unreliable data | 104 clamped to binary 1 | | 104 clamped to binary 1 | 104 unclamped (binary 1) | +| | | | Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s | Data | + +Modem 2 + +| Data | S1 | Scrambled binary 1 at 1200 bit/s | Scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s | Data | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------| +| | $100 \pm 3 \text{ ms}$ | $600 \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | $200 \text{ ms} \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | | +| | 106 | | Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at 2400 bit/s | 106 | +| | | $450 \text{ ms} \pm 10 \text{ ms}$ | | | +| | | Begin 16-way decisions in receiver | | | +| Unreliable data | 104 clamped to binary 1 | 104 clamped to binary 1 | 104 unclamped (binary 1) | Data | +| | Detect end of S1 signal in channel 1 | | | | + +CCITT-81330 + +V.22 bis signal: + +S1 = Unscrambled double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3 \text{ ms}$ . + +FIGURE 8/V.22 bis + +#### A retrain at 2400 bit/s + +### 6.5 Operation after loss of line signal + +When the modem detects loss of received line signal (as specified in §§ 3.2 and 3.3) it shall turn OFF circuit 109 and shall clamp circuit 104 to binary 1. If received line signal is then detected (as specified in §§ 3.2 and 3.3) the modem shall turn ON circuit 109 but shall leave circuit 104 clamped to binary 1. If during the next 100 ms the modem detects a retrain sequence it shall proceed according to § 6.4 above. If the modem has not detected a retrain sequence by the end of the same 100 ms it shall remove the clamp from circuit 104. If at any time after turning ON circuit 109 following a drop out the modem detects loss of equalization, it shall proceed according to § 6.4 above. + +### 6.6 Optional rate signalling + +A modem may optionally instigate a rate change in response to a change in circuit 111 or manually, by a switch (or other means). The request may be made to change the operating rate from 1200 bit/s to 2400 bit/s or from 2400 bit/s to 1200 bit/s without disconnection from the GSTN (Note 1). + +#### 6.6.1 *Instigation of a rate change* + +- a) Upon initiation of a rate change, manually or by a change in the condition of circuit 111, the modem shall apply an OFF condition to circuit 106, clamp circuit 104 to binary ones and shall transmit unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3$ ms. During this procedure, circuits 109 and 107 shall remain on. +- b) Following this, the modem shall transmit scrambled R1 as defined in Table 3/V.22 *bis* at a rate of 1200 bit/s. +- c) $450 \pm 10$ ms after detection of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the receiver shall examine the descrambled repetitive dibits R2 from the distant modem to determine the operating rate for subsequent transmission as defined in Table 3/V.22 *bis*; at this time, the receiver may begin making decisions at the rate indicated by R2 which may differ from R1. +- d) $600 \pm 10$ ms after detection of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the transmission shall begin transmission of scrambled binary ones at a rate indicated by the dibit R2 from the distant modem. Following transmission of $200 \pm 10$ ms of scrambled binary ones, the modem shall condition circuit 106 to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data. +- e) When 32 consecutive bits of scrambled binary one at the rate indicated by dibit R2 from the distant modem have been detected, the modem shall set circuit 112 to indicate the operating rate and unclamp circuit 104. +- f) If a modem has transmitted a rate change sequence and has not received unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s immediately prior, or during, or within a time interval equal to the maximum expected two-way propagation delay, the modem may return to the beginning of the rate change sequence as defined above and repeat the procedure until unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 is received from the remote modem. A time interval of 1.2 seconds is recommended for the maximum expected two-way propagation delay. + +#### 6.6.2 *Response to a rate change* + +- a) When the modem detects unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the modem shall turn circuit 106 OFF and clamp circuit 104 to binary one. During this procedure, circuit 109 and 107 shall remain on. +- b) When the end of unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem is detected, the modem shall condition its receiver for operation at 1200 bit/s and examine the descrambled repetitive dibit R1 (Note 2). +- c) After having detected 32 consecutive rate dibits R1, at 1200 bit/s, the modem shall transmit unscrambled repetitive double dibit 00 and 11 at 1200 bit/s for $100 \pm 3$ ms followed by transmission of scrambled repetitive dibit R2 defining the operating rate (Note 3). +- d) $450 \pm 10$ ms after the detection of 32 consecutive rate dibits R1 at 1200 bit/s from the distant modem, the modem may condition its receiver to begin operation at the data rate indicated by R2. +- e) $600 \pm 10$ ms after the detection of 32 consecutive rate dibits R1 at 1200 bit/s, the modem shall begin transmission of scrambled binary ones at the data rate indicated by R2. After $200 \pm 10$ ms of scrambled binary ones, the modem shall condition circuit 106 to respond to circuit 105 and the modem shall be ready to transmit data. +- f) When 32 consecutive bits of scrambled binary one, at the rate indicated by the dibit R2 have been detected from the distant modem, the modem shall set circuit 112 to indicate the operating rate and unclamp circuit 104. + +*Note 1* - This mode of operation, where implemented, should be provided on both GSTN circuits and leased circuits. + +*Note 2* - In the event where the initiating modem is requesting a retrain, the responding modem may delay transmission of the S1 sequence (which should be transmitted immediately following the detection of the end of receipt of the S1 sequence per § 6.4) by more than 32 dibit duration after receipt of the end of the S1 sequence from the initiating modem. + +*Note 3* - It is the intent that for a rate change to occur, dibit R2 be set equal to dibit R1. Modems not supporting this option may return a dibit R2 that differs from R1. + +TABLE 4/V.22 bis + +| Operating rate | Dibit R1 and R2 | +|----------------|-----------------| +| 2400
1200 | 11
01 or 10 | + +![Timing diagram for the optional rate change sequence in V.22 bis. The diagram shows the interaction between an Initiating modem and a Responding modem. The Initiating modem sends Data, S1, Scrambled dibit R1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate, and Data at R2 Rate. The Responding modem sends Data, S1, Scrambled dibit R2 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate, and Data. Key events include: Date change initiated, Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at R2 rate and assert CT 112 to reflect R2 rate, Detect end of S1 signal in channel 2, Detect end of S1 signal in channel 1, and Begin receiver decisions based on R2 rate. Time intervals are specified as 100 ± 3 ms, 450 ± 10 ms, 600 ± 10 ms, and 200 ± 10 ms. Data fields are 106, 104 clamped to binary 1, 104 unclamped (binary 1), and 104 data.](2cde062fd82833415971a8bd1a2cafab_img.jpg) + +**Initiating modem** + +| | | | | | +|------|----|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------| +| Data | S1 | Scrambled dibit R1 at 1200 bit/s | Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate | Data at R2 Rate | +|------|----|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------| + +100 ± 3 ms + +450 ± 10 ms + +200 ± 10 ms + +106 + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 data + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 unclamped (binary 1) + +Data + +Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at R2 rate and assert CT 112 to reflect R2 rate + +600 ± 10 ms + +100 ± 3 ms + +Detect end of S1 signal in channel 2 + +**Responding modem** + +| | | | | | +|------|----|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|------| +| Data | S1 | Scrambled dibit R2 at 1200 bit/s | Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate | Data | +|------|----|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|------| + +600 ± 10 ms + +200 ± 10 ms + +450 ± 10 ms + +Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at R2 rate and assert CT 112 to reflect R2 rate + +Detect end of S1 signal in channel 1 + +Begin receiver decisions based on R2 rate + +106 + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 data + +104 clamped to binary 1 + +104 unclamped (binary 1) + +Data + +106 + +Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at R2 rate and assert CT 112 to reflect R2 rate + +Timing diagram for the optional rate change sequence in V.22 bis. The diagram shows the interaction between an Initiating modem and a Responding modem. The Initiating modem sends Data, S1, Scrambled dibit R1 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate, and Data at R2 Rate. The Responding modem sends Data, S1, Scrambled dibit R2 at 1200 bit/s, Scrambled binary 1 at R2 rate, and Data. Key events include: Date change initiated, Detect 32 consecutive bits of binary 1 at R2 rate and assert CT 112 to reflect R2 rate, Detect end of S1 signal in channel 2, Detect end of S1 signal in channel 1, and Begin receiver decisions based on R2 rate. Time intervals are specified as 100 ± 3 ms, 450 ± 10 ms, 600 ± 10 ms, and 200 ± 10 ms. Data fields are 106, 104 clamped to binary 1, 104 unclamped (binary 1), and 104 data. + +FIGURE 9/V.22 bis + +#### Optional rate change sequence + +## 7 Testing facilities + +### 7.1 Test loops + +Test loops 2 (local and remote) and 3 as defined in Recommendation V.54 shall be provided. Interface operation shall be as defined in Recommendation V.54. Instigation and termination sequences are not compatible with Recommendation V.54. + +#### 7.1.1 *Instigation of remote loop 2* + +Signals controlling the application of remote loop 2 may only be transmitted after the synchronizing handshake has been completed. + +As in Recommendation V.54, the modems are referred to as Modem A and Modem B. + +When Modem A is instructed to instigate a remote loop 2, the modem shall transmit an initiation signal of unscrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s (or 1200 bit/s). + +Modem B shall detect 154-231 ms of the initiation signal, and then transmit to Modem A scrambled alternating binary ones and zeros (reversals) at 2400 bit/s (or 1200 bit/s). + +Modem A shall detect 231-308 ms of scrambled reversals, cease transmission of the initiation signal, and then transmit scrambled binary 1 at 2400 bit/s (or 1200 bit/s). + +Modem B shall detect the loss of initiation signal and achieve loop 2 within Modem B. + +Modem A, upon receiving 231-308 ms of scrambled binary 1 shall indicate to the DTE that it may begin sending test messages. + +#### 7.1.2 *Termination of remote loop 2* + +When Modem A is instructed to terminate a remote loop 2 the line signal shall be suppressed for a period of $77 \pm 10$ ms, after which transmission shall be restored. + +Modem B detects the loss of line signal in 40 to 65 ms and detects the re-appearance of the signal within $155 \pm 50$ ms, after which the modem B returns to normal operation. + +### 7.2 *Self tests* + +#### 7.2.1 *Self test end-to-end* + +Upon activation of the self test switch, an internally generated data pattern of alternative binary ones and zeros (reversals) at the selected bit rate shall be applied to the scrambler. An error detector, capable of identifying errors in a stream of reversals, shall be connected to the output of the descrambler. The presence of errors shall be indicated by a visual indicator. All generating interchange circuits except 114 (if used), 115, 125 and 142 shall be clamped to the binary 1 or OFF condition. If circuit 113 is used, the DCE shall disregard this interchange circuit and use its internal clock. + +#### 7.2.2 *Self test with loop 3* + +Loop 3 shall be applied to the modem as defined in Recommendation V.54. The self-test switch shall be activated and DCE operation shall be as in § 7.2.1. + +#### 7.2.3 *Self test with remote loop 2* + +The modem shall be conditioned to instigate a loop 2 at the remote modem as specified in § 7.1. The self-test switch shall be activated and DCE operation shall be as in § 7.2.1. + +It shall be possible to perform the above tests (in §§ 7.2.1, 7.2.2 and 7.2.3) with or without the DTE connected to the modem. These tests employ an internally generated data pattern that is controlled by a switch on the DCE. + +7.2.4 During any self-test mode, interchange circuits 103, 105 and 108 will be ignored. Note that self tests do not test asynchronous-to-synchronous converter circuits in either the transmitter or receiver. + +*Note* - Inclusion of remote loop signalling according to Recommendation V.54 is for further study. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.23-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.23-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7572c92bc9438f709d2ee182e8852543f6d4302e --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.23-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +## V.23 + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK --- + +## 600/1200-BAUD MODEM STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK + +## ITU-T Recommendation V.23 + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +### NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.23 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +### Recommendation V.23 + +## 600/1200-BAUD MODEM STANDARDIZED FOR USE IN THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK + +*(Geneva, 1964; amended at Mar del Plata, 1968, Geneva, 1972, 1976 and 1980, +Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984 and at Melbourne, 1988)* + +*Note* - The modem, designed for use on connections set up by switching in the general telephone network, can obviously be used on leased lines. + +**1** The principal characteristics recommended for a modem to transmit data at medium speed in the general switched telephone network are as follows: + +- use of modulation rates up to 600/1200 bauds on the communication channel (see Recommendation V.5); +- frequency modulation with synchronous or asynchronous mode of operation; +- inclusion of a backward channel at modulation rates up to 75 bauds for error control, use of this channel being optional. + +### **2 Modulation rates and characteristic frequencies for the forward data-transmission channel** + +| | $F_0$ | $F_Z$
(symbol 1,
mark) | $F_A$
symbol 0,
space) | +|--------------------------|---------|------------------------------|------------------------------| +| Mode 1: up to 600 bauds | 1500 Hz | 1300 Hz | 1700 Hz | +| Mode 2: up to 1200 bauds | 1700 Hz | 1300 Hz | 2100 Hz | + +It is understood that the modem would be used in mode 1 when the presence of long loaded cables and/or the presence on some connections of signalling receivers operating close to 2000 Hz would prevent satisfactory transmission in mode 2. The modem could be used in mode 2 on suitable connections. + +### **3 Tolerances on the characteristic frequencies for the forward channel** + +It should be possible with all rates of modulation to permit a tolerance, at the transmitter, of $\pm 10$ Hz on both the $F_A$ and $F_Z$ frequencies. This tolerance should be considered as a limit. + +Acceptance of these tolerances would give a tolerance of $\pm 10$ Hz for the mean-frequency $F_0 = (F_A + F_Z)/2$ . + +The tolerance on the frequency difference $F_A - F_Z$ with regard to the nominal value would be $\pm 20$ Hz. + +A maximum frequency drift of $\pm 6$ Hz has been assumed in the connection between the modems which might consist of several carrier circuits connected in tandem. This would make the tolerances on the mark and space frequencies at the receiving modem $\pm 16$ Hz. + +### 4 Modulation rate and characteristic frequencies for the backward channel + +The modulation rate and characteristic frequencies for the backward channel are as follows: + +| | $F_Z$ | $F_A$ | +|--------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------| +| | (symbol 1,
mark) | (symbol 0,
space) | +| Modulation rate up to 75 bauds | 390 Hz | 450 Hz | + +In the absence of any signal on the backward channel interface, the condition Z signal is to be transmitted. + +### 5 Tolerances on the characteristic frequencies of the backward channel + +As the backward channel is a VF telegraph-type channel, the frequency tolerances should be as recommended in Recommendation R.35 [1] for frequency-shift voice-frequency telegraphy. + +The $\pm 6$ -Hz frequency drift in the connection between the modems postulated in § 3 above would produce additional distortion in the backward channel. This should be taken into account in the design. + +### 6 Division of power between the forward and backward channels + +Considering the following table which shows the levels of power for total power remaining equal to 1 mW: + +| Forward channel level
(dBm) | Backward channel level
(dBm) | +|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 0 | - $\infty$ | +| - 1 | - 7 | +| - 2 | - 4 | +| - 3 | - 3 | + +equal division of power between the forward and backward channels could be recommended provisionally. + +### 7 The following information is provided to assist equipment manufacturers: + +- The nominal range of attenuations in subscriber-to-subscriber connections is from 5 to 30 dB at the reference frequency (800 or 1000 Hz), assuming up to 35-dB attenuation at the recommended mean frequency ( $F_0$ ) of the forward channel. +- A convenient range of sensitivity at the mean frequency $F_0$ for data receivers has been found to be - 40 to 0 dBm for the forward channel at the subscribers' terminals. +- The data modem should have no adjustment for send level or receive sensitivity under the control of the operator. + +### 8 Interchange circuits + +The configurations of interchange circuits are those essential for the particular switched network or leased circuit requirement as indicated in Tables 1/V.23 and 2/V.23. Where one or more of such requirements are provided in a modem, then all the appropriate interchange circuits should be provided. + +8.1 *List of interchange circuits essential for the modems when used on the general switched telephone network, including terminals equipped for manual calling or answering or automatic calling or answering (see Table 1/V.23).* + +8.2 *List of interchange circuits essential for the modems when used on non-switched leased telephone circuits (see Table 2/V.23)* + +8.3 *Response times of circuits 106 and 109, 121 and 122* + +8.3.1 *Definitions* + +8.3.1.1 Circuits 109 and 122 response times are the times that elapse between the connection or removal of a tone to or from the modem receive line terminals and the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuits 109 and 122. + +The test tone should have a frequency corresponding to the characteristic frequency of binary 1 and be derived from a source with an impedance equal to the nominal input impedance of the modem. + +The level of the test tone should fall within the level range between 3 dB above the actual threshold of the received line signal detector and the maximum admissible level of the received signal. At all levels within this range the measured response times shall be within the specified limits. + +TABLE 1/V.23 + +| Interchange circuit | | Forward (data) channel
one-way system
(Note 1) | | | | Forward (data) channel
either way system
(Note 1) | | +|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| No. | Designation | Without backward channel | | With backward channel | | Without
backward
channel | With
backward
channel | +| | | Transmit
end | Receive
end | Transmit
end | Receive
end | | | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 103 | Transmitted data | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 104 | Received data | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 105 | Request to send | - | - | - | - | X | X | +| 106 | Ready for sending | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 107 | Data set ready | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 108/1
or
108/2
(Note 2)
109 | Connect data set to line
Data terminal ready | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| | Data channel received line signal detector | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 111 | Data signalling rate selector (DTE) | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 114
(Note 3) | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE) | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 115
(Note 3) | Receiver signal element timing (DCE) | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 118 | Transmitted backward channel data | - | - | - | X | - | X | +| 119 | Receiver backward channel data | - | - | X | - | - | X | +| 120 | Transmit backward channel line signal | - | - | - | - | - | X | +| 121
(Note 4) | Backward channel ready | - | - | - | X | - | X | +| 122
(Note 4) | Backward channel received line signal detector | - | - | X | - | - | X | +| 125 | Calling indicator | X | X | X | X | X | X | + +*Note 1* - All essential interchange circuits and any others which are provided shall comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits indicated by X shall be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment and in the data circuit-terminating equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see § 9). + +*Note 2* - This circuit shall be capable of operation as circuit 108/1 - *Connect data set to line* or circuit 108/2 - *Data terminal ready* depending on its use. + +*Note 3* - These circuits are required when the optional clock is implemented in the modem. + +*Note 4* - These circuits are not required if the modem is operating in an asymmetrical duplex mode. + +TABLE 2/V.23 + +| Interchange circuit | | Forward (data) channel
one-way system
(Note 1) | | | | Forward data
channel either
way or both ways
simultaneously system
(Note 1) | | +|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| No. | Designation | Without backward channel | | With backward channel | | Without
backward
channel | With
backward
channel | +| | | Transmit
end | Receive
end | Transmit
end | Receive
end | | | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 103 | Transmitted data | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 104 | Received data | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 105 | Request to send | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 106 | Ready for sending | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 107 | Data set ready | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 111 | Data signalling rate selector (DTE) | X | X | X | X | X | X | +| 114
(Note 2) | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE) | X | - | X | - | X | X | +| 115
(Note 2) | Receiver signal element timing (DCE) | - | X | - | X | X | X | +| 118 | Transmitted backward channel data | - | - | - | X | - | X | +| 119 | Received backward channel data | - | - | X | - | - | X | +| 120 | Transmit backward channel line signal | - | - | - | X | - | X | +| 121 | Backward channel ready | - | - | - | X | - | X | +| 122 | Backward channel received line signal detector | - | - | X | - | - | X | + +*Note 1* - All essential interchange circuits and any others which are provided shall comply with the functional and operational requirements of Recommendation V.24. All interchange circuits indicated by X shall be properly terminated in the data terminal equipment and in the data circuit terminating equipment in accordance with the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics (see § 9). + +*Note 2* - These circuits are required when the optional clock is implemented in the modem. + +8.3.1.2 Circuit 106 response times are from the connection of an ON or OFF condition on: + +- circuit 105 (where it is provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 106; +- circuit 122 (where circuit 105 is not provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 106 in a configuration having a single data channel together with a single backward channel only; +- circuit 107 (where circuits 105 and 122 are not provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 106; + +8.3.1.3 Circuit 121 response times are from the connection of an ON or OFF condition on: + +- circuit 120 (where it is provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 121; +- circuit 109 (where circuit 120 is not provided) to the appearance of the corresponding ON or OFF condition on circuit 121. + +#### 8.3.2 Response times + +TABLE 3/V.23 + +| | | | | +|-------------|-----------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Circuit 106 | OFF to ON | 750 ms to 1400 ms (see Note 1) | a) 20 ms to 40 ms
(see Note 2)
b) 200 ms to 275 ms
(see Note 2) | +| | ON to OFF | $\leq 2$ ms | | +| Circuit 109 | OFF to ON | 300 ms to 700 ms (see Note 1) | 10 ms to 20 ms (see Note 1) | +| | ON to OFF | 5 ms to 15 ms | | +| Circuit 121 | OFF to ON | 80 ms to 160 ms | | +| | ON to OFF | $\leq 2$ ms | | +| Circuit 122 | OFF to ON | $< 80$ ms | | +| | ON to OFF | 15 ms to 80 ms | | + +*Note 1* - For automatic calling and answering, the longer response times of circuits 106 and 109 are to be used during call establishment only. + +*Note 2* - The choice of response times depends upon the system application: + +- a) no protection given against line echoes; +- b) protection given against line echoes. + +*Note 3* - The above parameters are provisional and are the subject of further study. + +#### 8.4 Threshold of data channel and backward channel received line signal detectors + +Level of received line signal at receive line terminals of modem for all types of connections, i.e. general switched telephone network or non-switched leased telephone circuits: + +| | | +|-----------------------|----------------------| +| greater than - 43 dBm | circuits 109/122 ON | +| less than - 48 dBm | circuits 109/122 OFF | + +The condition of circuits 109 and 122 for levels between -43 dBm and -48 dBm is not specified except that the signal detectors shall exhibit a hysteresis action such that the level at which the OFF to ON transition occurs is at least 2 dB greater than that for the ON to OFF transition. + +Where transmission conditions are known on switched or leased circuits, Administrations should be permitted at the time of modem installation to change these response levels of the received line signal detectors to less sensitive values (e.g. -33 dBm and -38 dBm respectively). + +#### 8.5 *Clamping in half-duplex mode* + +The DCE, when operating in half-duplex mode on a 2-wire line, shall hold, where implemented: + +- i) circuit 104 in the binary 1 condition and circuit 109 in the OFF condition when circuit 105 is in the ON condition and, where required to protect circuit 104 from false signals, for a period of $150 \pm 25$ milliseconds following the ON to OFF transition on circuit 105. The use of this additional delay is optional, based on system considerations; +- ii) circuit 119 in the binary 1 condition and circuit 122 in the OFF condition when circuit 120 is in the ON condition and, where required to protect circuit 119 from false signals, for a time interval following the ON to OFF transition on circuit 120. The specific duration of this time interval is left for further study. The additional delay is optional, based on system considerations. + +#### 8.6 *Fault condition of interchange circuits* + +(See Recommendation V.28, § 7 for association of the receiver failure detection types). + +8.6.1 The DTE should interpret a fault condition on circuit 107 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +8.6.2 The DCE should interpret a fault condition on circuits 105 and 108 as an OFF condition using failure detection type 1. + +8.6.3 All other circuits not referred to above may use failure detection types 0 or 1. + +### 9 **Electrical characteristics of interchange circuits** + +Use of electrical characteristics conforming to Recommendation V.28 is recommended together with the connector pin assignment plan specified by ISO 2110. + +*Note* - Manufacturers may wish to note that the long-term objective is to replace electrical characteristics specified in Recommendation V.28, and that Study Group XVII has agreed that the work shall proceed to develop a more efficient, all balanced, interface for the V-Series application which minimizes the number of interchange circuits. + +### 10 **Equipment for the disablement of echo suppressors** + +When echo control device disabling is required, it is recommended that the procedures specified in Recommendation V.25 be followed. + +### 11 **Inclusion of a clock in the modem** + +A clock is not an essential item in the standardized modem. However, the modem may conveniently include a clock when used primarily for synchronous transmission. + +If such a clock is included in the modem, a synchronizing pattern consisting of alternate binary 0 and binary 1 at clock rate should be transmitted for the whole interval between the OFF to ON transitions of interchange circuits 105 and 106. Users should note that part of this synchronizing pattern may appear at the distant receiver on circuit 104 after the OFF to ON transition of circuit 109. The data terminal equipment should make provision to differentiate between these false signals and true data. + +### **Reference** + +- [1] CCITT Recommendation *Standardization of FMVFT systems for a modulation rate of 50 bauds*, Vol. VII, Rec. R.35. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.230-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.230-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f430eb854448d4022684e9018fd8224fec9bb206 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.230-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1449 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +## V.230 + +**DATA COMMUNICATION +OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +--- + +**GENERAL DATA COMMUNICATIONS +INTERFACE LAYER 1 SPECIFICATION** + +**ITU-T Recommendation V.230** + +(Extract from the *Blue Book*) + +--- + +# NOTES + +1 ITU-T Recommendation V.230 was published in Fascicle VIII.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below). + +2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +# GENERAL DATA COMMUNICATIONS INTERFACE LAYER 1 SPECIFICATION + +(Melbourne, 1988) + +## 1 General + +This Recommendation defines the layer 1 characteristics of a General Data Communications Interface (GDCI) between Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) and/or Data Terminal Equipment (DTE). Applications include DTE-DCE interfaces, DCE-DCE interfaces, and possible DTE-DTE interfaces (see Figure 1/V.230). The interface specification is based on the ISDN basic user-network interface defined in Recommendation I.430. The differences between the GDCI and the ISDN basic user-network interface provide for the different wiring configurations expected for these interfaces, and they provide a means by which equipment conforming to V.230 can identify whether it has been connected to an interface operating according to V.230 or to an interface operating according to I.430. The characteristics of the GDCI have been chosen so that it is possible to design terminals which are compatible with both I.430 and V.230, and so that inadvertent connection of I.430 equipment to a V.230 passive bus or of GDCI equipment to an I.430 passive bus will not result in passive bus malfunction. + +*Note* - DTE-DTE interfaces are not defined by CCITT. + +![Diagram illustrating GDCI applications. It shows three main configurations: 1. A DTE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. 2. A DCE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. 3. A DTE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. Below these, there is a section labeled 'Up to 8 units' showing a DTE (or DCE) connected to a V.230 interface. To the right, there is an 'Analogue interface' section showing a V.230 interface connected to an analogue interface. The diagram is labeled 'T1700300-88'.](2df09d249c38abee55dbf0526dd6da0a_img.jpg) + +Diagram illustrating GDCI applications. It shows three main configurations: 1. A DTE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. 2. A DCE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. 3. A DTE connected to a DCE, which is then connected to a V.230 interface. Below these, there is a section labeled 'Up to 8 units' showing a DTE (or DCE) connected to a V.230 interface. To the right, there is an 'Analogue interface' section showing a V.230 interface connected to an analogue interface. The diagram is labeled 'T1700300-88'. + +FIGURE 1/V.230 + +### GDCI applications + +## 2 Service characteristics + +### 2.1 Services required from the physical medium + +Layer 1 of this interface requires a balanced metallic transmission medium, for each direction of transmission, capable of supporting 192 kbit/s. + +### 2.2 Services provided to layer 2 + +Layer 1 provides the following services to layer 2 and the management entity. + +#### 2.2.1 *Transmission capability* + +Layer 1 provides the transmission capability, by means of appropriately encoded bit streams, for the BV and DV channels and the related timing and synchronization functions. + +*Note* - The BV and DV channels correspond to the B and D channels, respectively, as defined in the I-Series Recommendations. Use of the BV and DV channels is defined in Recommendations V.yy and V.zz (V.yy and V.zz: still under study). + +#### 2.2.2 *Activation/deactivation* + +Layer 1 provides the signalling capability and the necessary procedures to enable equipment to be deactivated when required and reactivated when required. The activation and deactivation procedures are defined in § 6.2. + +#### 2.2.3 *D-channel access* + +Layer 1 provides the signalling capability and the necessary procedures to enable equipment to gain access to the common resource of the DV channel in an orderly fashion while meeting the performance requirements of the DV-channel signalling system. These DV-channel access control procedures are defined in § 6.1 + +#### 2.2.4 *Maintenance* + +Layer 1 provides the signalling capability, procedures and necessary functions at layer 1 to enable the maintenance functions to be performed. + +#### 2.2.5 *Status indication* + +Layer 1 provides an indication to the higher layers of the status of layer 1. + +### 2.3 *Primitives between layer 1 and other entities* + +Primitives represent, in an abstract way, the logical exchange of information and control between layer 1 and other entities. They neither specify nor constrain the implementation of entities or interfaces. + +The primitives to be passed across the layer 1/2 boundary or to the management entity and parameter values associated with these primitives are defined and summarized in Table 1/V.230. For a description of the syntax and use of the primitives, refer to Recommendation X.211 and relevant detailed description in § 6. + +TABLE 1/V.230 + +#### **Primitives associated with layer 1** + +| Generic name | Specific name | | Parameter | | Message unit contents | +|------------------|---------------|------------|--------------------|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Request | Indication | Priority indicator | Message unit | | +| L1 < - - > L2 | | | | | | +| PH-DATA | X
(Note 1) | X | X
(Note 2) | X | Layer 2 peer-to-peer message | +| PH-ACTIVATE | X | X | - | - | | +| PH-DEACTIVATE | X | X | - | - | | +| M < - - > L1 | | | | | | +| MPH-ERROR | - | X* | - | X | *Type of error or recovery from a previously reported error | +| MPH-ACTIVATE | X | X | - | - | | +| MPH-DEACTIVATE | X | X | - | - | | +| MPH- INFORMATION | - | X | - | X | Connected
Attached V-DCE
Attached V-DTE
Attached NT
Attached TE
Disconnected | + +*Note 1* - PH-Data Request implies underlying negotiation between layer 1 and layer 2 for the acceptance of the data. + +*Note 2* - Priority indication applies only to the request type. + +## 3 Modes of operation + +Both point-to-point and point-to-multipoint modes of operation, as described below, are intended to be accommodated by the layer 1 characteristics of the GDCL. In this Recommendation, the modes of operation apply only to the layer 1 procedural characteristics of the interface and do not imply any constraints on modes of operation at higher layers. + +### 3.1 Point-to-point operation + +Point-to-point operation at layer 1 implies that only one source (transmitter) and one sink (receiver) are active at any one time in each direction of transmission at an S or T reference point. (Such operation is independent of the number of interfaces which may be provided on a particular wiring configuration - see § 4.) + +### 3.2 Point-to-multipoint operation + +Point-to-multipoint operation at layer 1 allows more than one equipment (source and sink pair) to be simultaneously active at a GDCL. (The multipoint mode of operation may be accommodated, as discussed in § 4, with point-to-point or point- + +to-multipoint wiring configurations.) + +## 4 Types of wiring configuration + +The electrical characteristics of the GDCI are determined on the basis of certain assumptions about the various wiring configurations which may exist in the user premises. These assumptions are identified in two major configuration descriptions, §§ 4.1 and 4.2, together with additional material contained in Annex A to this Recommendation. Figure 2/V.230 shows a general reference configuration for wiring in the user premises. + +![Figure 2/V.230: Reference configuration for wiring in the user premises location. The diagram shows a horizontal line representing a cable. On the left, a box labeled 'DTEd' is connected to the line at interface point I_A0. A terminating resistor 'TR' is connected to the line at this point. Further along the line, there are several interface points labeled I_A1, I_An, and I_B. At I_A1, a box labeled 'DTE1' is connected. At I_An, a box labeled 'DTEn' is connected. At I_B, a box labeled 'DCE' is connected. A terminating resistor 'TR' is also connected to the line at I_B. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd_s' indicates the distance between the two terminating resistors. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd_n' indicates the distance between I_A1 and I_An. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd_s' indicates the distance between I_An and I_B. The text 'T1700460-89' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.](88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg) + +Figure 2/V.230: Reference configuration for wiring in the user premises location. The diagram shows a horizontal line representing a cable. On the left, a box labeled 'DTEd' is connected to the line at interface point I\_A0. A terminating resistor 'TR' is connected to the line at this point. Further along the line, there are several interface points labeled I\_A1, I\_An, and I\_B. At I\_A1, a box labeled 'DTE1' is connected. At I\_An, a box labeled 'DTEn' is connected. At I\_B, a box labeled 'DCE' is connected. A terminating resistor 'TR' is also connected to the line at I\_B. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd\_s' indicates the distance between the two terminating resistors. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd\_n' indicates the distance between I\_A1 and I\_An. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd\_s' indicates the distance between I\_An and I\_B. The text 'T1700460-89' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +| | | +|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TR | Terminating resistor | +| I | Electrical interface | +| B | Location of I B when the terminating resistor (TR) is include in the DCE | + +FIGURE 2/V.230 + +### Reference configuration for wiring in the user premises location + +### 4.1 Point-to-point configuration + +A point-to-point wiring configuration implies that only one source (transmitter) and one sink (receiver) are interconnected on an interchange circuit. + +### 4.2 Point-to-multipoint configuration + +A point-to-multipoint wiring configuration allows more than one source to be connected to the same sink or more than one sink to be connected to the same source on an interchange circuit. Such distribution systems are characterized by the fact that they contain no active logic elements performing functions (other than possibly amplification or regeneration of the signal). + +The equipment connected to interface point IB must operate in the "master timing mode" discussed in § 6.6. This equipment is normally a V-DCE. The equipment connected to interface points IA0 through IAn must operate in the "slave timing mode". These are normally V-DTEs, although a V-DCE may be connected to this point to achieve a DCE-to-DCE connection on the GDCI. Use of a V-DTE as the master timing mode equipment is for further study. + +### 4.3 Wiring polarity integrity + +For a point-to-point wiring configuration, the two wires of the interchange circuit pair may be reversed. However, for a point-to-multipoint wiring configuration, the wiring polarity integrity of the interchange circuit (slave-to-master direction) must be maintained between slave mode equipment. + +In addition, the wires of the optional pairs, which may be provided for powering, may not be reversed in either configuration. + +### 4.4 Location of the interfaces + +The wiring in the user premises is considered to be one continuous cable run with jacks for the equipment attached directly to the cable or using stubs less than 1 meter in length. The jacks are located at interface points IA and IB (see Figure 2/V.230). One interface point, IA, is adjacent to the master mode equipment. The other interface point, IB, is adjacent to the master mode equipment. However, in some applications, the equipment may be connected to the wiring without the use of a jack or with a jack which accommodates multiple interfaces. The required electrical characteristics (described in § 8) for IA and IB are different in some aspects. + +### 4.5 *Wiring associated with the equipment* + +The wiring connecting the V-DCE or V-DTE to associated jacks or to other equipment affects the interface electrical characteristics. Equipment that is not permanently connected to the interface wiring may be equipped with one of the following means of connection to the interface point: + +- a hard wired connecting cord (of not more than 10 m in the case of a V-DTE and not more than 3 m in the case of a V-DCE) equipped with a suitable plug, or +- a jack with a connecting cord (of not more than 10 m in the case of a V-DTE and not more than 3 m in the case of a V-DCE) equipped with a suitable plug at each end, or +- two jacks with suitable connecting cords or cables which may be used to form a "daisy-chain" connection from one equipment unit to the next, provided that the connecting cords and cables meet the distance limitations set in Annex A. In this case, the electrical interface exists inside the equipment, where the two jacks are wired together with each pin on one jack connected to the like-numbered pin on the other jack and to the internal circuitry of the equipment. + +The requirements of V.230 apply to the interface point ( $I_A$ or $I_B$ ), and the cord forms part of the associated equipment. Note that the equipment may attach directly to the interface wiring without a detachable cord. + +Although an equipment may be provided with a cord of less than 5 m in length, it shall meet the requirements of this Recommendation with a cord having a minimum length of 5 m. As specified above, the equipment cord may be detachable. Such a cord may be provided as part of the equipment, or the equipment may be designed to conform to the electrical characteristics specified in § 8 with a "standard ISDN basic access TE cord" conforming to the requirements specified in § 8.9 of Recommendation I.430, and having the maximum permitted capacitance. + +The use of an extension cord, of up to 25 m in length, with an equipment in point-to-point operation, is permitted. (The total attenuation of the wiring and of the cord in this case should not exceed 6 dB.) + +## 5 **Functional characteristics** + +The following paragraphs show the functions for the interface. + +### 5.1 *Interface functions* + +#### 5.1.1 *BV channel* + +This function provides, for each direction of transmission, two independent 64 kbit/s channels for use as BV channels. + +#### 5.1.2 *Bit timing* + +This function provides bit (signal element) timing at 192 kbit/s to enable the equipment to recover information from the aggregate bit stream. + +#### 5.1.3 *Octet timing* + +This function provides 8 kHz timing for the equipment. + +#### 5.1.4 *Frame alignment* + +This function provides information to enable equipment to recover the time division multiplexed channels. + +#### 5.1.5 *DV channel* + +This function provides, for each direction of transmission, one DV channel at a bit rate of 16 kbit/s. + +#### 5.1.6 *DV channel access procedure* + +This function is specified to enable slave mode equipment to gain access to the common resource of the DV channel in an orderly controlled fashion. The functions necessary for these procedures include an echoed DV channel at a bit rate of 16 kbit/s in the direction master to slave equipment. For the definition of the procedures relating to DV channel access, see § 6.1. + +#### 5.1.7 *Power feeding* + +This function provides for the capability to transfer power across the interface. The direction of power transfer depends on the application. In a typical application, it may be desirable to provide for power transfer from the V-DCE towards V-DTEs in order to, for example, power an adaptor for a unit which does not conform to V.230. (In some applications, unidirectional power feeding or no power feeding at all, across the interface, may apply.) Other Recommendations concerning power feeding capability are contained in § 9. + +#### 5.1.8 *Activation and deactivation* + +Activation is necessary to initialize an equipment when power is applied, or when it is connected to the GDCL. Deactivation and activation may also be used to control entry to and exit from a low power consumption mode. The procedures and precise conditions under which these actions take place are specified in § 6.2. For many applications, it will be appropriate for the equipment to remain in the active state at all times after initial activation. + +### 5.2 *Interchange circuits* + +Two interchange circuits, one for each direction of transmission, shall be used to transfer digital signals across the interface. All of the functions described in § 5.1, except for power feeding, shall be carried by means of a digitally multiplexed signal structured as defined in § 5.4. + +### 5.3 *Connected/disconnected indication* + +The criterion used by equipment to determine whether it is connected or disconnected at the interface is reception of valid incoming frames. + +The layer 1 entity within the equipment shall inform the management entity of the connection status using the MPH-INFORMATION INDICATION primitive. The method for determining the message unit contents is discussed in § 6.2. + +### 5.4 *Frame structure* + +In both directions of transmission, the bits shall be grouped into frames of 48 bits each. The frame structure shall be identical for all configurations (point-to-point and point-to-multipoint). + +#### 5.4.1 *Bit rate* + +The nominal transmitted bit rate at the interfaces shall be 192 kbit/s in both directions of transmission. + +#### 5.4.2 Binary organization of the frame + +The frame structures are different for each direction of transmission. Both structures are illustrated diagrammatically in Figure 3/V.230. + +![Figure 3/V.230: Frame structure at the GDCI. The diagram shows two bit streams: 'MASTER TO SLAVE' and 'SLAVE TO MASTER'. The 'MASTER TO SLAVE' stream starts with D, L, F, L, followed by a 2-bit offset, then B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, E, D, A, FA, N, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, E, D, M, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, E, D, S, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, E, D, L, F, L. The 'SLAVE TO MASTER' stream starts with D, L, F, L, followed by a 2-bit offset, then B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, L, D, L, FA, L, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, L, D, L, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, L, D, L, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, L, D, L, F, L. A legend defines the bits: F (framing bit), L (DC balancing bit), D (DV-channel bit), E (DV-echo-channel bit), FA (Auxiliary framing bit), N (bit set to a binary value N = FA), B1 (bit within BV channel 1), B2 (bit within BV channel 2), A (bit used for activation), S (S-channel multiframe bit), and M (multiframe bit).](562f471e8153729557e6a4ee6343c32c_img.jpg) + +Figure 3/V.230: Frame structure at the GDCI. The diagram shows two bit streams: 'MASTER TO SLAVE' and 'SLAVE TO MASTER'. The 'MASTER TO SLAVE' stream starts with D, L, F, L, followed by a 2-bit offset, then B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, E, D, A, FA, N, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, E, D, M, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, E, D, S, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, E, D, L, F, L. The 'SLAVE TO MASTER' stream starts with D, L, F, L, followed by a 2-bit offset, then B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, L, D, L, FA, L, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, L, D, L, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, B1, L, D, L, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, B2, L, D, L, F, L. A legend defines the bits: F (framing bit), L (DC balancing bit), D (DV-channel bit), E (DV-echo-channel bit), FA (Auxiliary framing bit), N (bit set to a binary value N = FA), B1 (bit within BV channel 1), B2 (bit within BV channel 2), A (bit used for activation), S (S-channel multiframe bit), and M (multiframe bit). + +Note 1 - Dots demarcate those parts of the frame that are independently DC-balanced. + +Note 2 - The FA bit in the direction slave to master is used as a Q bit in every fifth frame if the Q channel capability is applied (see § 6.3.3). + +Note 3 - The nominal 2-bit offset is as seen from the slave mode equipment (IA in Figure 1/V.230). The corresponding offset at the master mode equipment may be greater due to delay in the interface cable and varies by configuration. + +FIGURE 3/V.230 + +##### Frame structure at the GDCI + +##### 5.4.2.1 Slave to master + +Each frame consists of the following groups of bits; each individual group is DC-balanced by its last bit (L bit): + +| Bit position | Group | +|--------------|----------------------------------------------------| +| 1 and 2 | framing signal with balance bit | +| 3-11 | BV1 channel (first octet) with balance bit | +| 12 and 13 | DV-channel bit with balance bit | +| 14 and 15 | FA auxiliary framing bit or Q bit with balance bit | +| 16-24 | BV2 channel (first octet) with balance bit | +| 25 and 26 | DV-channel bit with balance bit | +| 27-35 | BV1 channel (second octet) with balance bit | + +| | | +|-----------|---------------------------------------------| +| 36 and 37 | DV-channel bit with balance bit | +| 38-46 | BV2 channel (second octet) with balance bit | +| 47 and 48 | DV channel bit with balance bit | + +##### 5.4.2.2 *Master to slave* + +Frames transmitted by the master contain an echo channel (E bits) used to retransmit the DV bits received from the slaves. The DV-echo channel is used for DV-channel access control. The last bit of the frame (L bit) is used for balancing each complete frame. + +The bits are grouped as follows: + +| Bit position | Group | +|---------------------|--------------------------------------| +| 1 and 2 | framing signal with balance bit | +| 3-10 | BV1 channel (first octet) | +| 11 | E, DV-echo-channel bit | +| 12 | DV-channel bit | +| 13 | bit A used for activation | +| 14 | F A auxiliary framing bit | +| 15 | N bit (coded as defined in § 6.3) | +| 16-23 | BV2 channel (first octet) | +| 24 | E, DV-echo-channel bit | +| 25 | DV-channel bit | +| 26 | M, multiframing bit | +| 27-34 | BV1 channel (second octet) | +| 35 | E, DV-echo-channel bit | +| 36 | DV-channel bit | +| 37 | S, layer 1 multiframe channel bit | +| 38-45 | BV2 channel (second octet) | +| 46 | E, DV-echo-channel bit | +| 47 | DV-channel bit | +| 48 | frame balance bit | + +##### 5.4.2.3 *Relative bit positions* + +At the slave mode equipment, timing in the direction to the master mode equipment shall be derived from the frames received from the master mode equipment. + +The first bit of each frame transmitted from a slave equipment towards the master equipment shall be delayed, nominally, by two bit periods with respect to the first bit of the frame received from the master equipment. Figure 3/V.230 illustrates the relative bit positions for both transmitted and received frames. + +### 5.5 Line code + +For both directions of transmission, pseudo-ternary coding is used with 100% pulse width as shown in Figure 4/V.230. Coding is performed in such a way that a binary ONE is represented by no line signal; whereas, a binary ZERO is represented by a positive or negative pulse. The first binary ZERO following the framing balance bit is of the same polarity as the framing balance bit. Subsequent binary ZEROs must alternate in polarity. A balance bit is a binary ZERO if the number of binary ZEROs following the previous balance bit is odd. A balance bit is a binary ONE if the number of binary ZEROs following the previous balance bit is even. + +![Figure 4/V.230: Pseudo-ternary code example of application. The diagram shows the mapping of binary values to a line signal. Binary values: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1. Line signal: A horizontal line representing the signal level. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal (the line remains at the baseline). For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 1, there is no signal. The signal alternates polarity for binary zeros. A time axis 't' with an arrow is shown at the bottom right. Below the diagram is the text 'CCITT - 62 730'.](ff2492be4fa814905acbad18f261b8a5_img.jpg) + +Figure 4/V.230: Pseudo-ternary code example of application. The diagram shows the mapping of binary values to a line signal. Binary values: 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1. Line signal: A horizontal line representing the signal level. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal (the line remains at the baseline). For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 0, there is a positive pulse. For binary 0, there is a negative pulse. For binary 1, there is no signal. For binary 1, there is no signal. The signal alternates polarity for binary zeros. A time axis 't' with an arrow is shown at the bottom right. Below the diagram is the text 'CCITT - 62 730'. + +FIGURE 4/V.230 + +#### Pseudo-ternary code - example of application + +### 5.6 Timing considerations + +Equipment may employ one of two timing sources, if available, for transmission of frames across the interface: + +- timing derived from an internal source or from an external source conveyed to the equipment by other means (e.g. timing derived from the receive line timing by a V-DCE). This is referred to as "master timing mode". Exactly one equipment on a GDCI bus must operate in this mode. +- timing derived from the receive side of the interface ("loopback timing"). This is referred to as "slave timing mode". + +## 6 Interface procedures + +### 6.1 DV-channel access procedure + +The following procedure allows for a number of slave mode equipments connected in a multipoint configuration to gain access to the DV channel in an orderly fashion. The procedure always ensures that, even in cases where two or more equipments attempt to access the DV channel simultaneously, one, but only one, of the equipments will be successful in completing transmission of its information. This procedure relies upon the use of layer 2 frames delimited by flags consisting of the binary pattern "01111110" and the use of zero bit insertion to prevent flag imitation (see Recommendation I.441). + +The procedure also permits equipment to operate in a point-to-point manner. + +#### 6.1.1 Interframe (layer 2) time fill + +When a slave mode equipment has no layer 2 frames to transmit, it shall send binary ONES on the DV channel, i.e., the interframe time fill in the slave-to-master direction shall be all binary ONES. + +When a master timing mode equipment has no layer 2 frames to transmit, it shall send binary ONES or HDLC flags on the DV channel, i.e., the interframe time fill in the master-to-slave direction shall be either all binary ONES or repetitions of the octet "01111110". When the interframe time fill is HDLC flags, the flag which defines the end of a frame may define the start of the next frame. + +#### 6.1.2 D-echo channel + +The master timing mode equipment, on receipt of a DV-channel bit, shall reflect the binary value, in the next available DV-echo-channel bit position towards the slave mode equipment. + +#### 6.1.3 *DV-channel monitoring* + +Slave mode equipment, while in the active condition, shall monitor the DV-echo channel, counting the number of consecutive binary ONES. If a ZERO bit is detected, the equipment shall restart counting the number of consecutive ONE bits. The current value of the count is called C. + +*Note* - C need not be incremented after the value eleven has been reached. + +#### 6.1.4 *Priority mechanism* + +Layer 2 frames are transmitted using one of two priority classes. Priority class 1 frames are given priority over priority class 2 frames. Furthermore, to ensure that within each priority class all competing equipments are given a fair access to the DV channel, once an equipment has successfully completed the transmission of a frame, it is given a lower level of priority within that class. The equipment is given back its normal level within a priority class when all equipments have had an opportunity to transmit information at the normal level within that priority class. + +The priority class of a particular layer 2 frame may be a characteristic of the equipment which is preset at manufacture or at installation, or it may be passed down from layer 2 as a parameter of the PH-DATA REQUEST primitive. A dual mode (GDCI/ISDN) terminal may thus use the PH-DATA REQUEST primitive to establish the proper priorities for its operation. + +The priority mechanism is based on the requirement that slave mode equipment may start layer 2 frame transmission only when C (see § 6.1.3) is equal to, or exceeds, the value $X_1$ for priority class 1 or is equal to, or exceeds, the value $X_2$ for priority class 2. The value of $X_1$ shall be eight for the normal level and nine for the lower level of priority. The value of $X_2$ shall be ten for the normal level and eleven for the lower level of priority. + +In a priority class, the value of the normal level of priority is changed into the value of the lower level of priority (i.e., higher value) when the equipment has successfully transmitted a layer 2 frame of that priority class. + +The value of the lower level of priority is changed back to the value of the normal level of priority when C (see § 6.1.3) equals the value of the lower level of priority (i.e., higher value). + +#### 6.1.5 *Collision detection* + +While transmitting information in the DV channel, slave mode equipment shall monitor the received DV-echo channel and compare the last transmitted bit with the next available DV-echo bit. If the transmitted bit is the same as the received echo, the equipment shall continue its transmission. If, however, the received echo is different from the transmitted bit, the equipment shall cease transmission immediately and return to the DV-channel monitoring state. + +#### 6.1.6 *Priority system* + +Annex B describes an example of how the priority system may be implemented. + +### 6.2 *Activation/deactivation* + +#### 6.2.1 *Definitions* + +##### 6.2.1.1 *Slave mode equipment states (normally DTE)* + +6.2.1.1.1 State F1 (inactive): In this inactive state, the equipment is not transmitting. This state is entered upon loss of power. + +6.2.1.1.2 State F2 (sensing): This state is entered after the equipment has been powered on, but has not determined the type of signal (if any) being received. + +6.2.1.1.3 State F3 (deactivated): This is the deactivated state of the physical protocol. Neither the master nor the slave equipment is transmitting. + +6.2.1.1.4 State F4 (awaiting signal): When the equipment is requested to initiate activation by means of an ACTIVATE REQUEST primitive, it transmits a signal (INFO 1) and waits for a response. + +6.2.1.1.5 State F5 (identifying input): At the first receipt of any signal from the master mode equipment, the slave mode equipment ceases to transmit INFO 1 and awaits identification of signal INFO 2 or INFO 4. + +6.2.1.1.6 State F6 (synchronized): When the equipment receives an activation signal (INFO 2) from the master, it responds with a signal (INFO 3) and waits for normal frames (INFO 4). + +6.2.1.1.7 State F7 (identifying interface): This is a transition state during entry to normal activation. When this state is entered, a timer (T4) is started, and the appropriate (DTE or DCE) identification character is transmitted on the multiframe Q channel. This state continues until either a V-series identification character is received on the multiframe S channel or T4 times out. + +6.2.1.1.8 State F8 (lost framing): This is the condition where the equipment has lost frame synchronization and is awaiting re-synchronization by receipt of INFO 2 or INFO 4 or deactivation by receipt of INFO 0. + +6.2.1.1.9 State F9 (activated): This is the normal active state with the protocol activated in both directions. Both the master and slave mode equipments are transmitting normal frames. + +##### 6.2.1.2 *Master mode equipment states (normally DCE)* + +6.2.1.2.1 State G1 (deactive): In this deactivated state, the equipment is not transmitting. + +6.2.1.2.2 State G2 (pending activation): In this partially active state, the master mode equipment sends INFO 2 while waiting for INFO 3. This state will be entered after receiving an ACTIVATE REQUEST primitive, or on the receipt of INFO 0 or lost framing while in state G3 or G5. Then the choice to eventually deactivate is up to higher layers within the equipment. + +6.2.1.2.3 State G3 (identifying interface): This is a transition state during entry to normal activation. When this state is entered, a timer (T4) is started, and the appropriate (DTE or DCE) identification character is transmitted on the multiframe S channel. This state continues until either a V-series identification (DTE or DCE) is received on the multiframe Q channel or T4 times out. + +6.2.1.2.4 State G4 (pending deactivation): When the equipment wishes to deactivate, it may wait for a timer to expire before returning to the deactivated state. + +6.2.1.2.5 State G5 (active): This is the normal active state where the master and slave mode equipment are transmitting INFO 4 and INFO 3 respectively. A deactivation may be initiated by a DEACTIVATE REQUEST primitive, or the equipment may remain in the active state all the time, under non-fault conditions. + +##### 6.2.1.3 *Activate primitives* + +The following primitives should be used between layers 1 and 2 and between layer 1 and the management entity in the activation procedures. For use in state diagrams, etc., abbreviations of the primitive names are also given. + +PH-ACTIVATE REQUEST (PH-AR) + +PH-ACTIVATE INDICATION (PH-AI) + +MPH-ACTIVATE REQUEST (MPH-AR) + +MPH-ACTIVATE INDICATION (MPH-AI) + +##### 6.2.1.4 *Deactivate primitives* + +The following primitives should be used between layers 1 and 2 and between layer 1 and the management entity in the deactivation procedures. For use in state diagrams, etc., abbreviations of the primitive names are also given. + +MPH-DEACTIVATE REQUEST (MPH-DR) + +MPH-DEACTIVATE INDICATION (MPH-DI) + +PH-DEACTIVATE REQUEST (PH-DR) + +PH-DEACTIVATE INDICATION (PH-DI) + +##### 6.2.1.5 Management primitives + +The following primitives should be used between layer 1 and the management entity. For use in state diagrams, etc., abbreviations of the primitive names are also given. + +MPH-ERROR INDICATION (MPH-EI) +Message unit contains type of error or recovery from a previously reported error. + +MPH-INFORMATION INDICATION (MPH-II) +Message unit contains information regarding the physical layer conditions. The provisionally defined parameters are: connected, disconnected, attached DTE, attached DCE, attached TE, and attached NT. + +Note - Implementation of primitives in equipment is not for recommendation. + +#### 6.2.2 Signals + +The identifications of specific signals across the GDCI are given in Table 2/V.230. Also included is the coding for these signals. + +TABLE 2/V.230 + +Definition of INFO signals (Note 1) + +| Signals from MASTER TO SLAVE | | Signals from SLAVE TO MASTER | | +|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| INFO 0 | No signal | INFO 0 | No signal | +| | | INFO 1
(Note 2) | A continuous signal with the following pattern: Positive ZERO, negative ZERO, six ONEs | +| | | Timing diagram for INFO 1 signal showing a sequence of bit levels: Positive ZERO, negative ZERO, and six ONEs. The diagram is labeled CCITT-62731. | | +| | | Nominal bit rate = 192 kbit/s | | +| INFO 2
(Note 3) | Frame with all bits of BV, DV and DV-echo channels set to binary ZERO. Bit A set to binary ZERO. N and L bits set according to the normal coding rules. | INFO 3 | Synchronized frames with operational data on BV and DV channels. | +| INFO 4 | Frames with operational data on BV, DV and DV-echo channels. Bit A set to binary ONE. | | | + +Note 1 - For configurations where the wiring polarity may be reversed (see § 4.3) signals may be received with the polarity of the binary ZEROs inverted. All receivers should be designed to tolerate wiring polarity reversals. + +Note 2 - Slave mode equipment which does not need the capability to initiate activation of a deactivated V.230 interface need not have the capability to send INFO 1. In all other respects, this equipment shall be in accordance with § 6.2. It should be noted that in the point-to-multipoint configuration more than one slave mode equipment transmitting simultaneously will produce a bit pattern, as received by the master mode equipment, different from that described above, e.g., two or more overlapping (asynchronous) instances of INFO 1. + +Note 3 - During the transmission of INFO 2 or INFO 4, the F bits and the M/bits from the master mode equipment provide the Q-bit pattern designation as described in § 6.3.3. + +#### 6.2.3 *Activation/deactivation procedure for slave mode equipment* + +##### 6.2.3.1 *General procedures* + +All slave mode equipment conforms to the following procedures (these statements are an aid to understanding; the complete procedures are specified in § 6.2.3.2): + +- a) Equipment, when first connected, when power is applied, or upon the loss of frame alignment (see § 6.3.1.1) shall transmit INFO 0. However, an equipment that is disconnected but powered could be transmitting INFO 1 when connected. +- b) Equipment transmits INFO 3 when frame alignment is established (see § 6.3.1.2). However, the satisfactory transmission of operational data cannot be assured prior to the receipt of INFO 4. +- c) Equipment shall, when power is removed, initiate the transmission of INFO 0 before frame alignment is lost. + +##### 6.2.3.2 *Specification of the procedure* + +The procedure for equipment to follow during activation/deactivation is shown in the form of a finite state matrix Table 3/V.230. The use of the primitives at the layer 1/2 boundary and at the layer 1 /management entity boundary are also included. Those primitives serve to identify the connection status, and to identify whether other equipment connected to the passive bus is operating according to V.230 or I.430. + +TABLE 3/V.230 + +###### **Activation/deactivation layer 1 finite state matrix for GDCI slave (DTE)** + +| Event | State name | Inactive | Seizing | Deactivated | Awaiting signal | Identifying input | Synchronized | Identifying interface | Lost framing | Activated | +|------------------------------|--------------|----------|------------------|------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| | State number | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | +| | INFO sent | INFO 0 | INFO 0 | INFO 0 | INFO 1 | INFO 0 | INFO 3 | INFO 3 | INFO 0 | INFO 3 | +| Loss of power | | / | F1 | MPH-II(d);
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | MPH-II(d),
MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F1 | +| App. of power | | F2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | +| MPH-Act. Req. or PH-Act. Req | | / | | ST.T3
F4 | | | - | | - | | +| Expiry T3 | | / | / | - | MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F3 | MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F3 | MPH-DI
PH-DI;
F3 | - | - | - | +| Rec. INFO 0 | | / | MPH-II(c);
F3 | - | - | - | MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F3 | MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F3 | MPH-DI,
PH-DI,
MPH-EI2
F3 | MPH-DI,
PH-DI;
F3 | +| Rec. any signal (Note 1) | | / | - | - | F6 | - | / | / | - | / | +| Rec. INFO 2 | | / | MPH-II(c);
F6 | F6 | / | F6 | - | MPH-EI1;
F6 | MPH-EI2
F6 | MPH-EI1;
F6 | + +TABLE 3/V.230 (cont.) + +| Event | State name | Inactive | Seizing | Deactivated | Awaiting signal | Identifying input | Synchronized | Identifying interface | Lost framing | Activated | +|----------------------|--------------|----------|------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------| +| | State number | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | +| | INFO sent | INFO 0 | INFO 0 | INFO 0 | INFO 1 | INFO 0 | INFO 3 | INFO 3 | INFO 0 | INFO 3 | +| Rec. INFO 4 (Note 2) | | / | MPH-II(c),
MF-Q,
ST.T4
F7 | Send MF-Q
ST.T4;
F7 | / | Send MF-Q
ST.T4;
F7 | MPH-E12,
Send MF-Q,
ST.T4;
F7 | - | MPH-E12,
Send MF-Q,
ST.T4;
F7 | - | +| Rec. MF-S (DTE) | | / | / | / | / | / | / | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II
(a-DTE);
F9 | / | Send MF-Q;
- | +| Rec. MF-S(DCE) | | / | / | / | / | / | / | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II
(a-DCE);
F9 | / | Send MF-Q;
- | +| Expiry T4 | | - | - | - | - | - | - | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II
(a-NT);
F9 | - | - | +| Lost framing | | / | / | / | / | / | MPH-EI1;
F8 | MPH-EI1;
F8 | - | MPH-EI1;
F8 | + +| | | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| – | No change, no action | +| | Impossible by the definition of the layer 1 service | +| / | Impossible situation | +| a, b; Fn | Issue primitives or take actions "a" and "b" and then go to state "Fn" | +| PH-AI | Primitive PH - ACTIVATE INDICATION | +| PH-DI | Primitive PH - DEACTIVATE INFORMATION | +| MPH-AI | Primitive MPH - ACTIVATE INDICATION | +| MPH-DI | Primitive MPH - DEACTIVATE INDICATION | +| MPH-EI1 | Primitive MPH - ERROR INDICATION REPORTING ERROR | +| MPH-EI2 | Primitive MPH - ERROR INDICATION REPORTING RECOVERY | +| MPH-II(c) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (connected) | +| MPH-II(d) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (disconnected) | +| MPH-II(a-DCE) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, V-series DCE) | +| MPH-II(a-DTE) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, V-series DTE) | +| MPH-II(a-NT) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, I-series NT) | +| MF-Q | Multiframe V-series equipment ID on Q-channel (either DTE or DCE ID) | +| MF-S | Multiframe V-series equipment ID on Q-channel | +| ST.T3 | Start timer T3 | +| ST.T4 | Start timer T4 | + +Primitives are signals in a conceptual queue and will be cleared on recognition, while the INFO signals are continuous signals which are available all the time. The multiframe signals must be sent for a fixed number of multiframe periods, provisionally 6 periods. + +*Note 1* - This event reflects the case where a signal is received and the equipment has not (yet) determined whether it is INFO 2 or INFO 4. + +*Note 2* - Timer 4 (T4) is a supervisory timer which provides for the master timing mode equipment(s) to recognize the multiframe identification signal and reply. If no reply is received before T4 times out, connection to an I-series NT is assumed. The value of T4 is provisionally 500 ms. + +#### 6.2.4 Activation/deactivation for master mode equipment + +##### 6.2.4.1 Activating/deactivating equipment + +The procedure is shown in the form of a finite state matrix Table 4/V.230. The primitives at the layer 1/2 boundary and layer 1/management entity boundary are also shown. Those primitives serve to identify the connection status, and to identify whether other equipment connected to the passive bus is operating according to V.230 or I.430. + +##### 6.2.4.2 Non-activating/non-deactivating equipment + +The behaviour of such equipment is the same as that of an activating/deactivating equipment never receiving DEACTIVATE REQUEST primitive. States G1 (deactive), G4 (pending deactivation) and timers 1 and 2 may not exist for such equipment. + +#### 6.2.5 Timer values + +Timers are defined in the finite state matrix tables for both the master and slave mode GDCI equipment. The following values are defined for timers: + +- Timer 1 in master mode equipment: values from 2 s (for GDCI only application) to 30 s (for dual mode GDCI or ISDN application) are acceptable. +- Timer 2 in master mode equipment: values from 25 to 100 ms are acceptable. The value may be zero if the equipment does not provide for deactivation. +- Timer 3 in slave mode equipment: value must be selected longer than the worst case time to activate the equipment. The value should be at least one second longer than the value of T1 in the master equipment connected to the GDCI. +- Timer 4: This is the time allowed for other equipment in the GDCI to recognize a V-series equipment ID on the multiframe (S or Q) channel and to respond. This should normally take less than 30 ms, so the value of T4 is provisionally set to 50 ms. + +#### 6.2.6 Activation and deactivation times + +Slave mode equipment in the deactivated state (F3) shall, upon receipt of INFO 2, establish frame synchronization and begin transmission of INFO 3 within 100 ms. It shall recognize receipt of INFO 4 within two frames (in the absence of errors). + +Slave mode equipment in the "waiting for signal" state (F4) shall, upon the receipt of INFO 2, cease the transmission of INFO 1 and initiate the transmission of INFO 0 within 5 ms and then respond to INFO 2, within 100 ms, as above. (Note that in Table 3/V.230, the transition from F4 to F5 is indicated as the result of the receipt of "any signal" which is in recognition of the fact that the equipment may not know that the signal being received is INFO 2 until after it has recognized the presence of a signal.) + +Master mode equipment use of the "deactivated" and "pending activation" states remains a topic for future study. If these states and transitions are implemented, the timing recommendations of I.430 § 6.2.6.2 should be followed. + +#### 6.2.7 Multiframe identification codes + +Two characters must be selected from the unassigned values on the multiframe Q channel to identify a V-series DTE and a V-series DCE operating in the slave timing mode. Similarly, one character must be selected from the unassigned values on the multiframe S channel (SC1) to identify a V-series DCE operating in the master timing mode. + +Since there are only 16 characters available on each of these multiframe channels, the selection must be done carefully. The following character codes have provisionally been selected for the purpose of identifying V-series equipment using a GDCI: + +| Value (S 11 S 12 S 13 S 14 or Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 ) | Meaning | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| 1101 on Q channel | V-DTE, slave mode | +| 1100 on Q channel | V-DCE, slave mode | +| 0110 on S channel | V-DCE, master mode | + +*Note* - These codes are unassigned in the current US Draft Specification. + +TABLE 4/V.230 + +##### **Activation/deactivation layer 1 finite state matrix for CDCI master (DCE)** + +| State name

State number
Event
INFO sent | Deactive | Pending activation | Identifying interface | Pending deactivation | Active | +|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------| +| | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | +| | INFO 0 | INFO 2 | INFO 4 | INFO 0 | INFO 4 | +| MPH -Act. Req. or PH-Act. Req. | Start T1;
G2 | | | Start T1;
G2 | | +| MPH-Deact. Req. or PH-Deact. Req. | | Start T2;
PH-DI;
G4 | Start T2;
PH-DI;
G4 | | Start T2;
PH-DI;
G4 | +| Expiry T1 (Note 1) | - | Start T2;
PH-DI;
G4 | / | - | / | +| Expiry T2 (Note 2) | - | - | - | G1 | - | +| Rec. INFO 0 | - | - | MPH-DI,
MPH-EI;
G2 | G1 | MPH-DI,
MPH-EI;
G2 | +| Rec. INFO 1 | Start T1;
G2 | - | / | - | / | +| Rec. INFO 3 | / | Stop T1,
Start T4,
Send MF-S;
G3
(Note 3) | - | - | - | +| Rec. MF-Q (DTE) | / | / | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II(a-DTE);
G5 | - | Send MF-S;
- | +| Rec. MF-Q (DCE) | / | / | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II(a-DTE);
G5 | - | Send MF-S;
- | +| Expiry T4 | - | - | PH-AI,
MPH-AI,
MPH-II(a-TE);
G5 | - | - | +| Lost framing | / | / | MPH-DI
MPH-EI
G2 | - | MPH-DI,
MPH-EI;
G2 | + +| | | +|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------| +| — | No change, no action | +| | Impossible by the definition of the layer 1 service | +| / | Impossible situation | +| a, b; Gn | Issue primitives or take actions "a" and "b" then go to state "Gn" | +| PH-AI | Primitive PH - ACTIVATE INDICATION | +| PH-DI | Primitive PH - DEACTIVATE INDICATION | +| MPH-AI | Primitive MPH - ACTIVATE INDICATION | + +| | | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| MPH-DI | Primitive MPH - DEACTIVATE INDICATION | +| MPH-EI | Primitive MPH - ERROR INDICATION REPORTING ERROR | +| MPH-II(a-DCE) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, V-series DCE) | +| MPH-II(a-DTE) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, V-series DTE) | +| MPH-II(a-TE) | Primitive MPH - INFORMATION INDICATION (attached, I-series TE) | +| MF-S | Multiframe V-series equipment ID on S-channel (currently only a DCE ID is defined) | +| MF-Q | Multiframe V-series equipment ID on Q-channel (DCE or DTE) | + +Primitives are signals in a conceptual queue and will be cleared on recognition, while the INFO signals are continuous signals which are available all the time. The multiframe signals must be sent for a fixed number of multiframe periods, provisionally 6 periods. + +*Note 1* - Timer 1 (T1) is a supervisory timer which has to take into account the overall time to activate. + +*Note 2* - Timer 2 (T2) prevents unintentional reactivation. Its value is normally between 25 ms and 100 ms. This implies that a slave timing mode equipment must recognize INFO 0 and react on it within 25 ms. If the master timing mode equipment is able to unambiguously recognize INFO 1, or if the master timing mode equipment does not use the MPH-DEACTIVATE REQUEST primitive, then the value of T2 may be 0. + +*Note 3* - Timer 4 (T4) is a supervisory timer which provides time for the slave timing mode equipment(s) to recognize the multiframe identification signal and reply. If no reply is received before T4 times out, connection to an I-series TE is assumed. The value of T4 is provisionally 50 ms. + +### 6.3 *Frame alignment procedures* + +The first bit of each frame is the framing bit, $f$ ; it is a binary ZERO. + +The frame alignment procedure makes use of the fact that the framing bit is represented by a pulse having the same polarity as the preceding pulse (line code violation). This allows rapid reframing. + +According to the coding rule, both the framing bit and the first binary ZERO bit following the framing balance bit (in the same frame) produce a line code violation. To guarantee secure framing, the auxiliary framing bit pair $F_A$ and N in the direction master-to-slave or the auxiliary framing bit $F_A$ with the associated balancing bit L in the direction slave-to-master are introduced. This ensures that there is a line code violation at 14 bits or less from the framing bit F, due to $F_A$ or N being a binary ZERO bit (master-to-slave) or to $F_A$ being a binary ZERO bit (slave-to-master) if the $F_A$ bit position is not used as a Q bit. The framing procedures do not depend on the polarity of the framing bit F, and thus are not sensitive to wiring polarity. + +The coding rule for the auxiliary framing bit pair $F_A$ and N, in the direction master-to-slave, is such that N is the binary opposite of $F_A$ ( $N = \overline{F_A}$ ). The $F_A$ and L bits in the direction slave-to-master are always coded such that the binary values of $F_A$ and L are equal. + +#### 6.3.1 *Frame alignment procedure in the direction master-to-slave to slave timing mode equipment* + +Frame alignment, on initial activation of the slave mode equipment, shall comply with the procedures defined in § 6.2. + +##### 6.3.1.1 *Loss of frame alignment* + +Loss of frame alignment may be assumed when a time period equivalent to two 48-bit frames has elapsed without having detected valid pairs of line code violations obeying the $\leq 14$ bit criterion as described above. The slave timing mode equipment shall cease transmission immediately. + +##### 6.3.1.2 *Frame alignments* + +Frame alignment may be assumed to occur when three consecutive pairs of line code violations obeying the $\leq 14$ bit criterion have been detected. + +#### 6.3.2 *Frame alignment in the direction slave-to-master timing mode equipment* + +The criterion of a line code violation at 13 bits or less from the framing bit (F) shall apply except if the Q channel (see § 6.3.3) is provided, in which case the 13-bit criterion applies in four out of five frames. + +##### 6.3.2.1 *Loss of frame alignment* + +The master mode equipment may assume loss of frame alignment if a time equivalent to at least two 48-bit frames has elapsed since detecting consecutive violations according to the 13-bit criterion, if all $F_A$ bits have been set to binary ZERO. Otherwise, a time period equivalent to at least three 48-bit frames shall be allowed before assuming loss of frame alignment. On detection of loss of frame alignment, the master equipment shall continue transmitting towards the slave equipment. + +##### 6.3.2.2 *Frame alignment* + +The master timing mode equipment may assume that frame alignment has been regained when three consecutive pairs of line code violations obeying the 13-bit criterion has been detected. + +#### 6.3.3 *Multi-framing* + +A multi-frame described in the following paragraphs is intended to provide extra layer 1 capacity in the slave-to-master direction through the use of an extra channel between the slave and master equipment (Q channel). + +The use of the Q bits shall be the same in point-to-point as in point-to-multipoint configurations. Future standardization for the use of Q bits is for further study. (There is no inherent collision detection mechanism provided, and any collision detection mechanism that is required for any application of the Q bits will be outside the scope of this Recommendation.) + +##### 6.3.3.1 *General mechanism* + +- a) Q bit identification: The Q bits (slave mode to master mode equipment) are defined to be the bits in the $F_A$ bit position of every fifth frame. The Q bit positions in the slave-to-master direction are identified by binary inversions of the $F_A/N$ bit pair ( $F_A$ = binary ONE, $N$ = binary ZERO) in the master-to-slave direction. The provision for identification of the Q-bit positions in the master-to-slave direction permits all slave mode equipment to synchronize transmission in Q-bit positions, thereby avoiding interference of $F_A$ bits from one equipment with the Q bits of a second equipment in passive bus configurations. +- b) Multi-frame identification: A multi-frame, which provides for structuring the Q bits in groups of four (Q1-Q4), is established by setting the M bit, in position 26 of the master-to-slave frame, to binary ONE in every twentieth frame. This structure provides for 4-bit characters in a single channel, slave-to-master. + +##### 6.3.3.2 *Q-bit position identification algorithm* + +The Q-bit position identification algorithm is illustrated in Table 5/V.230. Two examples of how such an identification algorithm can be realized are as follows. The slave mode equipment Q-bit identification algorithm may be simply the transmission of a Q-bit in each frame in which a binary ONE is received in the $F_A$ -bit position of the master-to-slave frame (i.e., echoing of the received $F_A$ bits). Alternatively, to minimize the Q-bit transmission errors that could result from errors in the $F_A$ bits of master-to-slave frames, a slave mode equipment may synchronize a frame counter to the Q-bit rate and transmit Q bits in every fifth frame, i.e., in frames in which $F_A$ should be present. Q bits would be transmitted only after counter synchronization to the binary ONES in the $F_A$ bit positions of the master-to-slave frames is achieved (and only if such bits are received). When the counter is not synchronized (not achieved or lost), a slave mode equipment which uses such an algorithm shall transmit binary ZEROS in Q-bit positions. The algorithm used by a slave mode equipment to determine when synchronization is defined to be achieved or the algorithm used to determine when it is defined to be lost is not described in this Recommendation. + +No special Q-bit identification is required in the master mode equipment because the maximum round trip delay of the master-to-slave-to-master is a small fraction of a frame, and therefore, Q-bit identification is inherent in the master timing mode equipment. + +TABLE 5/V.230 + +###### **Q-bit position identification and multiframe structure** + +| Frame number | MASTER TO SLAVE
F A bit position | SLAVE TO MASTER
F A bit position
(1, 2) | MASTER TO SLAVE
M bit | +|--------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------| +| 1 | ONE | Q1 | ONE | +| 2 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 3 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 4 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 5 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 6 | ONE | Q2 | ZERO | +| 7 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 8 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 9 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 10 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 11 | ONE | Q3 | ZERO | +| 12 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 13 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 14 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 15 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 16 | ONE | Q4 | ZERO | +| 17 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 18 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 19 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 20 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| 1 | ONE | Q1 | ONE | +| 2 | ZERO | ZERO | ZERO | +| etc. | | | | + +*Note 1* - If the Q bits are not used by a slave mode equipment, the Q bits shall be set to binary ONE. + +*Note 2* - Where multiframe identification is not provided with a binary ONE in an appropriate M bit, but where Q-bit positions are identified, Q bits 1 through 4 are not distinguished. + +##### 6.3.3.3 *Slave timing mode equipment multiframe identification* + +The first frame of the multiframe is identified by the M bit equal to a binary ONE. Slave mode equipment shall use the M bit equal to a binary ONE to identify the start of the multiframe. + +The algorithm used by a slave mode equipment to determine when synchronization or loss of synchronization of the multiframe is achieved is not described in this Recommendation. + +#### 6.3.4 S channel structuring algorithm + +The algorithm for structuring the S bits (master-to-slave frame bit position 37) into an S channel uses the same combination of the $F_A$ bit inversions and the M bit that is used to structure the Q channel as described in § 6.3.3. The S channel structure, shown in Table 6/V.230, provides for five subchannels, SC1 through SC5. Each subchannel SCn is comprised of the bits SCn1 through SCn4 which provides for the transfer of one 4-bit character per multiframe (5 ms). This Recommendation discusses the use of subchannel SC1 only. Subchannels SC2 through SC5 are reserved for future use, and shall be coded with all binary ZEROs. The coding and use of the 4-bit character of SC1 are discussed in § 6.2.7. + +TABLE 6/V.230 + +**S-channel structure** + +| Frame number | $F_A$ bit | M bit | S bit | +|--------------|-----------|-------|-------| +| 1 | ONE | Q1 | SC11 | +| 2 | ZERO | ZERO | SC21 | +| 3 | ZERO | ZERO | SC31 | +| 4 | ZERO | ZERO | SC41 | +| 5 | ZERO | ZERO | SC51 | +| 6 | ONE | ZERO | SC12 | +| 7 | ZERO | ZERO | SC22 | +| 8 | ZERO | ZERO | SC32 | +| 9 | ZERO | ZERO | SC42 | +| 10 | ZERO | ZERO | SC52 | +| 11 | ONE | ZERO | SC13 | +| 12 | ZERO | ZERO | SC23 | +| 13 | ZERO | ZERO | SC33 | +| 14 | ZERO | ZERO | SC43 | +| 15 | ZERO | ZERO | SC53 | +| 16 | ONE | ZERO | SC14 | +| 17 | ZERO | ZERO | SC24 | +| 18 | ZERO | ZERO | SC34 | +| 19 | ZERO | ZERO | SC44 | +| 20 | ZERO | ZERO | SC54 | +| 1 | ONE | ONE | SC11 | +| 2 | ZERO | ZERO | SC21 | +| etc. | | | | + +*Note* - Subchannels SC2 through SC5 are reserved for future standardization and are set to all binary ZEROs. + +### 6.4 Idle channel code on the BV channels + +A slave mode equipment shall send binary ONES in any BV channel which is not assigned to it. + +## 7 Layer 1 maintenance + +Test loopbacks, similar to those defined in Recommendation I.430, are for further study. + +## 8 Electrical characteristics + +### 8.1 Bit rate + +#### 8.1.1 Nominal rate + +The nominal bit rate is 192 kbit/s. + +#### 8.1.2 Tolerance + +The tolerance (free running mode) is $\pm 100$ ppm. + +### 8.2 Jitter and bit-phase relationship between slave mode equipment input and output + +#### 8.2.1 Test configurations + +The jitter and phase deviation measurements are carried out with four different waveforms at the slave mode equipment input, in accordance with the following configurations: + +- i) point-to-point configuration with 6 dB attenuation measured between the two terminating resistors at 96 kHz (high capacitance cable), +- ii) short passive bus with 8 units (including the unit under test) clustered at the far end from the signal source (high capacitance cable), +- iii) a) and b) short passive bus with the unit under test adjacent to the signal source and the other seven units clustered at the far-end from the signal source (high and low capacitance cable); +- iv) ideal test signal condition, with one source connected directly to the receiver of the unit under test (i.e., without artificial line). + +Examples of waveforms that correspond to the configurations i), ii), iiia) and iiib) are given in Figures 5/V.230 to 8/V.230. Test configurations which can generate these signals are given in Annex C. + +![FIGURE 5/V.230: Waveform for test configuration i) - point-to-point (6 dB). The graph shows normalized amplitude on the y-axis from -1.0 to 1.0 and time in clock periods on the x-axis from 0.10 to 2.10. The plot shows multiple overlapping signal traces forming an eye diagram pattern, with transitions occurring between -0.5 and 0.5 normalized amplitude levels. A small label 'T1808970-89' is in the bottom right corner.](ed4ac651ede0d26d4aeae595c3d8200c_img.jpg) + +FIGURE 5/V.230: Waveform for test configuration i) - point-to-point (6 dB). The graph shows normalized amplitude on the y-axis from -1.0 to 1.0 and time in clock periods on the x-axis from 0.10 to 2.10. The plot shows multiple overlapping signal traces forming an eye diagram pattern, with transitions occurring between -0.5 and 0.5 normalized amplitude levels. A small label 'T1808970-89' is in the bottom right corner. + +FIGURE 5/V.230 + +**Waveform for test configuration i) - point-to-point (6 dB) +( $C = 120$ nF/km)** + +![Figure 6/V.230: A line graph showing normalized amplitude versus time in clock periods. The y-axis ranges from -1.40 to 1.40 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The x-axis ranges from 0.10 to 2.10 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The graph displays multiple signal traces that show a step-like transition from approximately -1.00 to +1.00 around 0.25 clock periods, followed by a return to -1.00 around 1.10 clock periods. The traces exhibit some overshoot and ringing. The identifier 'CCITT-83511' is located in the bottom right corner of the plot area.](97f61e67792478fb6ce089868e503063_img.jpg) + +Figure 6/V.230: A line graph showing normalized amplitude versus time in clock periods. The y-axis ranges from -1.40 to 1.40 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The x-axis ranges from 0.10 to 2.10 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The graph displays multiple signal traces that show a step-like transition from approximately -1.00 to +1.00 around 0.25 clock periods, followed by a return to -1.00 around 1.10 clock periods. The traces exhibit some overshoot and ringing. The identifier 'CCITT-83511' is located in the bottom right corner of the plot area. + +FIGURE 6/V.230 + +**Waveform for test configuration ii) - short passive bus with 8 clustered slave mode equipments at the far end ( $C = 120 \text{ nF/km}$ )** + +![Figure 7/V.230: A line graph showing normalized amplitude versus time in clock periods. The y-axis ranges from -1.40 to 1.40 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The x-axis ranges from 0.10 to 2.10 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The graph displays multiple signal traces that show a step-like transition from approximately -1.00 to +1.00 around 0.25 clock periods, followed by a return to -1.00 around 1.10 clock periods. The traces exhibit some overshoot and ringing. The identifier 'CCITT-83521' is located in the bottom right corner of the plot area.](c17eaf807acd5faec68da19dd16929be_img.jpg) + +Figure 7/V.230: A line graph showing normalized amplitude versus time in clock periods. The y-axis ranges from -1.40 to 1.40 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The x-axis ranges from 0.10 to 2.10 with major grid lines every 0.20 units. The graph displays multiple signal traces that show a step-like transition from approximately -1.00 to +1.00 around 0.25 clock periods, followed by a return to -1.00 around 1.10 clock periods. The traces exhibit some overshoot and ringing. The identifier 'CCITT-83521' is located in the bottom right corner of the plot area. + +FIGURE 7/V.230 + +**Waveform for test configuration iii a) - short passive bus with 1 slave mode equipment near to the matter mode equipment and 7 slave mode equipments at the far end ( $C = 120 \text{ nF/km}$ )** + +![Figure 8/V.230: Waveform for test configuration iii b) - short passive but with 1 slave mode equipment near to the master mode equipment and 7 slave mode equipments at the far end (C = 30 nF/km). The graph plots Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis from -1.40 to 1.40 against Time (clock periods) on the x-axis from 0.10 to 2.10. The waveform shows multiple overlapping signal paths with transitions at approximately 0.30, 1.00, and 1.30 clock periods.](bfb6d182d624680db577069bbc0b2a93_img.jpg) + +Figure 8/V.230: Waveform for test configuration iii b) - short passive but with 1 slave mode equipment near to the master mode equipment and 7 slave mode equipments at the far end (C = 30 nF/km). The graph plots Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis from -1.40 to 1.40 against Time (clock periods) on the x-axis from 0.10 to 2.10. The waveform shows multiple overlapping signal paths with transitions at approximately 0.30, 1.00, and 1.30 clock periods. + +FIGURE 8/V.230 + +**Waveform for test configuration iii b) - short passive but +with 1 slave mode equipment near to the waster mode equipment and +7 slave mode equipments at the far end ( $C = 30 \text{ nF/km}$ )** + +#### 8.2.2 *Timing extraction jitter* + +Timing extraction jitter, as observed at the slave mode equipment output, shall be within $-7\%$ to $+7\%$ of a bit period, when the jitter is measured using a high pass filter with a cut-off frequency (3 dB point) of $30 \text{ Hz}$ under the test conditions described in § 8.2.1. The limitation applies with an output data sequence having binary ZEROs in both BV channels and with input data sequences described in a) to c) following. The limitation applies to the phase of all zero-volt crossings of all adjacent binary ZEROs in the output data sequence. + +- a) A sequence consisting of continuous frames with all binary ONES in DV, DV-echo and both BV channels. +- b) A sequence, repeated continuously for at least 10 seconds, consisting of: + - 40 frames with continuous octets of "10101010" (the first bit to be transmitted is binary ONE) in both BV channels and continuous binary ONES in DV and DV-echo channels followed by: + - 40 frames with continuos binary ZEROs in DV, DV-echo and both BV channels. +- c) A sequence consisting of a pseudo-random pattern with a length of $2^{19} - 1$ in DV, DV-echo and both BV channels. (This pattern may be generated with a shift register with 19 stages with the outputs of the first, the second, the fifth and the nineteenth stages added together (modulo 2) and fed back to the input.) + +#### 8.2.3 *Total phase deviation, input to output* + +The total phase deviation (including effects of timing extraction in the slave mode equipment), between the transitions of signal elements at the output of the slave mode equipment and the transitions of signal elements associated with the signal applied to the input, should not exceed the range of $-7\%$ to $+15\%$ of a bit period. This limitation applies to the output signal transitions of each frame with the phase reference defined as the average phase of the crossing of zero volts which occurs between the framing pulse and its associated balance pulse at the start of the frame and the corresponding crossings at the start of the three preceding frames of the input signal. For the purposes of demonstrating compliance of an equipment, it is sufficient to use (as the input signal phase reference) only the crossing of zero volts between the framing pulse and its associated balance pulse of the individual frame. This latter method, requiring a simpler test set, may create additional jitter at frequencies higher than about $1 \text{ kHz}$ and is therefore more restrictive. The limitation applies to the phase of the zero-volt crossings of all adjacent binary ZEROs in the output data sequence, which shall be as defined in § 8.2.2. The limitation applies under all test conditions described in § 8.2.1, with the additional input signal conditions specified in a) to d) following, and with superimposed jitter as specified in Figure 9/V.230 over the range of frequencies from $5 \text{ Hz}$ to $2 \text{ kHz}$ . The limitation applies for input bit rates of $192 \text{ kbit/s} \pm 100 \text{ ppm}$ . + +- a) A sequence consisting of continuous frames with all binary ONEs in the DV, DV-echo and both BV channels. +- b) A sequence consisting of continuous frames with the octet "10101010" (the first bit to be transmitted is binary ONE) in both BV channels and binary ONEs in DV and DV-echo channels. +- c) A sequence of continuous frames with binary ZEROs in DV, DV-echo and both BV channels. +- d) A sequence of continuous frames with a pseudo-random pattern, as described in § 8.2.2 c), in DV, and both BV channels. + +![Figure 9/V.230: Lower limit of maximum tolerable jitter at slave mode equipment input (log-log scale). The graph plots Peak-to-peak jitter (Y-axis) against Frequency (f) in Hz (X-axis). The Y-axis has values 0.05 and 0.5. The X-axis has values 5 Hz, 50 Hz, and 2 kHz. The plot shows a solid line that is horizontal at 0.5 from 5 Hz, then slopes down to 0.05 at 50 Hz, and remains horizontal at 0.05 until 2 kHz. A dashed line extends the slope downwards from the 50 Hz point.](4e5abec2ae85a6a3a1366c722daceccd_img.jpg) + +| Frequency (Hz) | Peak-to-peak jitter | +|----------------|---------------------| +| 5 | 0.5 | +| 50 | 0.05 | +| 2000 | 0.05 | + +Figure 9/V.230: Lower limit of maximum tolerable jitter at slave mode equipment input (log-log scale). The graph plots Peak-to-peak jitter (Y-axis) against Frequency (f) in Hz (X-axis). The Y-axis has values 0.05 and 0.5. The X-axis has values 5 Hz, 50 Hz, and 2 kHz. The plot shows a solid line that is horizontal at 0.5 from 5 Hz, then slopes down to 0.05 at 50 Hz, and remains horizontal at 0.05 until 2 kHz. A dashed line extends the slope downwards from the 50 Hz point. + +FIGURE 9/V.230 + +##### **Lower limit of maximum tolerable jitter at slave mode equipment input (log-log scale)** + +### 8.3 *Master mode equipment jitter characteristics* + +The maximum jitter (peak-to-peak) in the output sequence of a master mode equipment shall be 5% of a bit period when measured using a high pass filter having a cut-off frequency (3 dB point) of 50 Hz and an asymptotic roll off 20 dB per decade. The limitation applies for all data sequences, but for the purpose of demonstrating the compliance of an equipment, it is sufficient to measure jitter with output data sequence consisting of binary ONEs in DV and BV channels and with additional sequence as described in § 8.2.2. c) in DV and BV channels. The limitation applies to the phase of all-zero volt crossings of all adjacent binary ZEROs in the output data sequence. + +### 8.4 *Termination of the line* + +The interchange circuit pair termination (resistive) should be 100 ohms $\pm$ 5% (see Figure 2/V.230). + +### 8.5 *Transmitter output characteristics* + +#### 8.5.1 *Transmitter output impedance* + +The following requirements apply at interface point $I_A$ (see Figure 2/V.230 for slave mode equipment) and at interface point $I_B$ for master mode equipment (see §§ 4.5 and 8.9 regarding cordage capacitance). + +##### 8.5.1.1 *Master mode equipment transmitter output impedance* + +- a) When inactive or transmitting a binary ONE, the output impedance, in the frequency range of 2 kHz to 1 MHz, shall exceed the impedance indicated by the template in Figure 10/V.230. The requirement is applicable with an applied sinusoidal voltage of at least 100 mV (r.m.s. value). + +*Note* - In some applications, the terminating resistor can be combined with the master mode equipment (see point B of Figure 2/V.230). The resulting impedance is the impedance needed to exceed the combination of the template and the 100-ohm termination. + +b) When terminating a binary ZERO, the output impedance shall be $\geq 20$ ohms. + +*Note* - The output impedance limit shall apply for two nominal load impedance (resistive) conditions: 50 ohms and 400 ohms. The output impedance for each nominal load shall be defined by determining the peak pulse amplitude for loads equal to the nominal value $\pm 10\%$ . The peak amplitude shall be defined as the amplitude at the midpoint of a pulse. The limitation applies for pulses of both polarities. + +![Figure 10/V.230: Master mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale). The graph plots Impedance (Z) in Ohms (Ω) on the y-axis against Frequency in kHz on the x-axis. The y-axis has major ticks at 100, 250, 265, and 2500. The x-axis has major ticks at 2, 20, 106, and 1000. A shaded trapezoidal region represents the impedance limit. The bottom boundary is a horizontal line at Z=250 from 2 kHz to 1000 kHz. The top boundary starts at (2, 250), rises linearly to (20, 2500), remains constant at 2500 until 106 kHz, and then falls linearly to (1000, 250). The area between the top and bottom boundaries is shaded with diagonal lines.](20727e57890be6da5692a02d13c0a8ec_img.jpg) + +Figure 10/V.230: Master mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale). The graph plots Impedance (Z) in Ohms (Ω) on the y-axis against Frequency in kHz on the x-axis. The y-axis has major ticks at 100, 250, 265, and 2500. The x-axis has major ticks at 2, 20, 106, and 1000. A shaded trapezoidal region represents the impedance limit. The bottom boundary is a horizontal line at Z=250 from 2 kHz to 1000 kHz. The top boundary starts at (2, 250), rises linearly to (20, 2500), remains constant at 2500 until 106 kHz, and then falls linearly to (1000, 250). The area between the top and bottom boundaries is shaded with diagonal lines. + +FIGURE 10/V.230 + +###### Master mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale) + +##### 8.5.1.2 Slave mode equipment transmitter output impedance + +- a) In the inactive and powered down states or when transmitting a binary ONE, the following requirements apply: + - i) the output impedance, in the frequency range of 2 kHz to 1 MHz, should exceed the impedance indicated by the template in Figure 11/V.230. This requirement is applicable with an applied sinusoidal voltage of at least 100 mV (r.m.s. value); + - ii) at a frequency of 96 kHz, the peak current which results from an applied voltage of up to 1.2 V (peak value) should not exceed 0.6 mA (peak value). + +b) When transmitting a binary ZERO, the output impedance shall be $\geq 20$ ohms. + +*Note* - The output impedance limit shall apply for two nominal load impedance (resistive) conditions: 50 ohms and 400 ohms. The output impedance for each nominal load shall be defined by determining the peak pulse amplitude for loads equal to the nominal value $\pm 10\%$ . The peak amplitude shall be defined as the amplitude at the midpoint of a pulse. The limitation applies for pulses of both polarities. + +![Figure 11/V.230: Slave mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale). The graph plots Impedance (Z) in Ohms (Ω) on the y-axis against Frequency in kHz on the x-axis. The y-axis has major ticks at 100, 200, 250, and 2500. The x-axis has major ticks at 2, 20, 80, and 1000. A shaded trapezoidal region represents the impedance limit. The bottom boundary is a horizontal line at Z=200 from 2 kHz to 1000 kHz. The top boundary starts at (2, 250), rises linearly to (20, 2500), remains constant at 2500 until 80 kHz, and then falls linearly to (1000, 250). The area between the top and bottom boundaries is shaded with diagonal lines.](953203b3208524d293d4a65c0569324c_img.jpg) + +Figure 11/V.230: Slave mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale). The graph plots Impedance (Z) in Ohms (Ω) on the y-axis against Frequency in kHz on the x-axis. The y-axis has major ticks at 100, 200, 250, and 2500. The x-axis has major ticks at 2, 20, 80, and 1000. A shaded trapezoidal region represents the impedance limit. The bottom boundary is a horizontal line at Z=200 from 2 kHz to 1000 kHz. The top boundary starts at (2, 250), rises linearly to (20, 2500), remains constant at 2500 until 80 kHz, and then falls linearly to (1000, 250). The area between the top and bottom boundaries is shaded with diagonal lines. + +FIGURE 11/V.230 + +###### Slave mode equipment impedance template (log-log scale) + +#### 8.5.2 *Test load impedance* + +The test load impedance shall be 50 ohms (unless otherwise indicated). + +#### 8.5.3 *Pulse shape and amplitude (binary ZERO)* + +##### 8.5.3.1 *Pulse shape* + +Except for overshoot, limited as follows, pulses shall be within the mask of Figure 12/V.230. Overshoot, at the leading edge of pulses, of up to 5% of the pulse amplitude at the middle of a signal element, is permitted, provided that such overshoot has, at 1/2 of its amplitude, a duration of less than 0.25 $\mu$ s. + +##### 8.5.3.2 *Nominal pulse amplitude* + +The nominal pulse amplitude shall be 750 mV, zero to peak. + +A positive pulse (in particular, a framing pulse) at the output port of master mode and slave mode equipment is defined as a positive polarity of the voltage measured between access leads e to f and d to c respectively (see Figure 20/I.430). (See Table 7/V.230 for the relationship to connector pins.) + +#### 8.5.4 *Pulse unbalance* + +The "pulse unbalance", i.e., the relative difference in $\int U(t) dt$ for positive pulses and $\int U(t) dt$ for negative pulses shall be $\leq 5\%$ . + +#### 8.5.5 *Voltage on other test loads (slave mode equipment)* + +The following requirements are intended to assure compatibility with the condition where multiple slave mode equipments are simultaneously transmitting pulses on to a passive bus. + +##### 8.5.5.1 400-ohm load + +A pulse (binary ZERO) shall conform to the limits of the mask shown in Figure 13/V.230 when the transmitter is terminated in a 400-ohm load. + +![Figure 12/V.230: Transmitter output pulse mask. A diagram showing the voltage-time mask for a binary ZERO pulse. The vertical axis shows voltage levels at 100%, 50%, 7%, and 0%. The horizontal axis shows time durations in microseconds (μs).](ec36a1ba48e13289c395fab4a7730bdb_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the transmitter output pulse mask with the following specifications: + +- Top width: $5.73 \mu s$ +- Voltage levels: $V = 100\%$ (with $\pm 10\%$ tolerance bands), $50\%$ , $7\%$ , and $0$ (with $\pm 5\%$ tolerance). +- Inner pulse width at top: $4.17 \mu s$ ( $5.21 - 1.04$ ) +- Nominal pulse width: $5.21 \mu s$ +- Width at 50% level: $4.69 \mu s$ ( $5.21 - 0.52$ ) +- Width at 7% level: $6.25 \mu s$ ( $5.21 + 1.04$ ) +- Base width: $10.42 \mu s$ ( $5.21 + 5.21$ ) +- A $10\%$ vertical tolerance is indicated at the base of the pulse. +- The diagram is labeled CCITT-64430. + +Figure 12/V.230: Transmitter output pulse mask. A diagram showing the voltage-time mask for a binary ZERO pulse. The vertical axis shows voltage levels at 100%, 50%, 7%, and 0%. The horizontal axis shows time durations in microseconds (μs). + +*Note* - For clarity of presentation, the above values are based on a pulse width of $5.21 \mu s$ . See § 8.1 for a precise specification of the bit rate. + +FIGURE 12/V.230 + +**Transmitter output pulse mask** + +![A graph showing the voltage response of a system to an isolated pulse with a test load of 400 ohms. The vertical axis represents voltage in percent (%), ranging from -20 to 270. The horizontal axis represents time in microseconds (μs), ranging from 0 to 10.42. The graph shows a nominal pulse with a 50 Ω load, which is a rectangular pulse with a width of 5.21 μs and a height of 100%. The actual voltage response is shown as a shaded area, indicating the range of possible values. Key time points and voltage levels are marked: 0.1 μs at 270%, 1.04 μs at 160%, 0.26 μs at 100%, 4.1 μs at 100%, 0.47 μs at 100%, 4.69 μs at 100%, 0.52 μs at 0%, 5.21 μs at 0%, 1.25 μs at 0%, and 10.42 μs at -20%. The voltage levels are also marked: 270%, 160%, 100%, 90%, 50%, 7%, 5%, 0%, -5%, -10%, and -20%. The graph is labeled 'Nominal pulse with 50 Ω load' and 'T1808980-89'.](48a08e5cabec8b75386679d8a57dec3e_img.jpg) + +Graph showing Voltage (%) vs. Time (μs) for an isolated pulse with a test load of 400 ohms. The graph illustrates the nominal pulse with a 50 Ω load and the resulting voltage response over time. + +Key parameters and time points: + +- 0.1 μs +- 1.04 μs +- 0.26 μs +- 4.1 μs (5.21 - 1.11) +- 0.47 μs +- 4.69 μs (5.21 - 0.52) +- 0.52 μs +- 5.21 μs +- 1.25 μs +- 10.42 μs (5.21 + 5.21) + +Voltage levels (V = 100 %): + +- 270 +- 160 +- 100 +- 90 +- 50 +- 7 +- 5 +- 0 +- 5 +- 10 +- 20 + +Additional labels: + +- Nominal pulse with 50 Ω load +- 7 % +- 5 % +- 0 % +- T1808980-89 + +A graph showing the voltage response of a system to an isolated pulse with a test load of 400 ohms. The vertical axis represents voltage in percent (%), ranging from -20 to 270. The horizontal axis represents time in microseconds (μs), ranging from 0 to 10.42. The graph shows a nominal pulse with a 50 Ω load, which is a rectangular pulse with a width of 5.21 μs and a height of 100%. The actual voltage response is shown as a shaded area, indicating the range of possible values. Key time points and voltage levels are marked: 0.1 μs at 270%, 1.04 μs at 160%, 0.26 μs at 100%, 4.1 μs at 100%, 0.47 μs at 100%, 4.69 μs at 100%, 0.52 μs at 0%, 5.21 μs at 0%, 1.25 μs at 0%, and 10.42 μs at -20%. The voltage levels are also marked: 270%, 160%, 100%, 90%, 50%, 7%, 5%, 0%, -5%, -10%, and -20%. The graph is labeled 'Nominal pulse with 50 Ω load' and 'T1808980-89'. + +Note - For clarity of presentation, the above values are based on a pulse width of 5.21 μs. See § 8.1 for a precise specification of the bit rate. + +FIGURE 13/V.230 +Voltage for an isolated pulse with a test load of 400 ohms + +##### 8.5.5.2 5.6-ohm load + +To limit the current flow with two drivers having opposite polarities, the pulse amplitude (peak) with a 5.6-ohm load shall be $\leq 20\%$ of the nominal pulse amplitude. + +#### 8.5.6 Unbalance about earth + +The following requirements apply under all possible power feeding conditions, under all possible connections of the equipment to ground, and with two 100-ohm terminations across the transmit and receive ports. + +##### 8.5.6.1 Longitudinal conversion loss + +Longitudinal conversion loss (LCL), which is measured in accordance with Recommendation G.117, § 4.1.3 (see Figure 14/V.230), shall meet the following requirements: + +- $10 \text{ kHz} < f \leq 300 \text{ kHz}$ : $\geq 54 \text{ dB}$ +- $300 \text{ kHz} < f \leq 1 \text{ MHz}$ : minimum value decreasing from 54 dB at 20 dB/decade. + +![Circuit diagram for measuring longitudinal conversion loss (LCL). The diagram shows an 'Equipment' block with two ports labeled 'REC OR SEND' and 'SEND OR REC'. A 'Power sink 1 (source 1)' is connected to the equipment. A 'Metal foil' is connected to the equipment via a 200 pF capacitor (Note 2) and a 500 ohm resistor. The equipment is connected to a 'Ground (1 m x 1 m metal plate)'. The circuit includes various components: 100 ohm resistors (Note 1), 25 ohm resistors (Note 6), 10 uF capacitors, and inductors L_G (Note 5). A voltage source U_G is connected to the equipment. The output is measured as E_L (rms) (1v) across a 0 ohm resistor. The diagram is labeled CCITT-72502.](b904ac2472cab80892d1e783e6230d6e_img.jpg) + +Circuit diagram for measuring longitudinal conversion loss (LCL). The diagram shows an 'Equipment' block with two ports labeled 'REC OR SEND' and 'SEND OR REC'. A 'Power sink 1 (source 1)' is connected to the equipment. A 'Metal foil' is connected to the equipment via a 200 pF capacitor (Note 2) and a 500 ohm resistor. The equipment is connected to a 'Ground (1 m x 1 m metal plate)'. The circuit includes various components: 100 ohm resistors (Note 1), 25 ohm resistors (Note 6), 10 uF capacitors, and inductors L\_G (Note 5). A voltage source U\_G is connected to the equipment. The output is measured as E\_L (rms) (1v) across a 0 ohm resistor. The diagram is labeled CCITT-72502. + +The longitudinal conversion loss: $LCL = 20 \log_{10} \left| \frac{E_L}{V_T} \right| \text{ dB}$ + +The voltages $V_T$ and $E_L$ should be measured within the frequency range from 10 kHz up to 1 MHz using selective test measuring equipment. + +The measurement should be carried out in the states: + +- deactivated (receive, send). +- power off (receive, send), +- activated (receive). + +The interconnecting cord shall lie on the metal plate. + +*Note 1* - This resistor must be omitted if the termination is already built into the equipment. + +*Note 2* - Hand imitation is a thin metal foil with approximately the size of a hand. + +*Note 3* - Equipment with metallic housing shall have a galvanic connection to the metal plate. Other equipment with non-metallic housing shall be placed on the metal plate. + +*Note 4* - The power cord for mains-powered equipment shall lie on the metal plate and the earth protective wire of the mains shall be connected to the metal plate. + +*Note 5* - If there is no power source 1 in the master mode equipment, $R_G$ and $L_G$ are not required. + +*Note 6* - This circuit provides a transverse termination of 100 ohms and a balanced longitudinal termination of 25 ohms. Any equivalent circuit is acceptable. However, for equivalent circuits given in Recommendations G.117 and O.121, powering cannot be provided. + +FIGURE 14/V.230 + +##### Receiver input or transmitter output unbalance about earth + +8.5.6.2 *Output signal balance* + +Output signal balance which is measured in accordance with Recommendation G.117, § 4.3.1 (see Figure 15/V.230), shall meet the following requirements: + +- a) *f* - 96 kHz: ≥ 54 dB +- b) 96 kHz < *f* ≤ 1 MHz: minimum value decreasing from 54 dB at 20 dB/decade. + +![Figure 15/V.230 - Transmitter output unbalance about earth](fae82236e4211f753df5789eb276d3a4_img.jpg) + +Detailed description of Figure 15/V.230: A circuit diagram showing the test setup for measuring output signal balance. The diagram includes an 'Equipment' block containing 'REC' and 'SEND' sections and a 'Power sink 1 (source 1)'. The 'REC' and 'SEND' sections are connected to a network of resistors (100 Ω), inductors (L\_G ≥ 50 mH), and capacitors (≥ 10 μF). A 'Metal foil' is shown connected via a 200 pF capacitor and a 500 Ω resistor to a 'Ground (1 m x 1 m metal plate)'. Various measurement points for V\_T, V\_L, and U\_G are indicated. Notes 1 through 6 are placed at specific points in the circuit to refer to external documentation. The diagram is labeled CCITT - 22512. + +Figure 15/V.230 - Transmitter output unbalance about earth + +$$\text{Output signal balance} = 20 \log_{10} \left| \frac{V_T}{V_L} \right| \text{ dB}$$ + +The voltage *VT* and *VL* should be measured within the frequency range from 10 kHz up to 1 MHz using selective test measuring equipment. The measurement should be carried out in the active state. The pulse patterns should contain all binary ZEROs. However, for the purpose of demonstrating the compliance of an equipment, it is sufficient to measure the output signal unbalance about earth with a pulse pattern of continuous frames with at least the B1 and B2 Channels containing all binary ZEROs. + +The interconnecting cord shall lie on the metal plate. + +*Note* - See notes to this figure in Figure 14/V.230. + +FIGURE 15/V.230 + +**Transmitter output unbalance about earth** + + 8.6 *Receiver input characteristics* + + 8.6.1 *Receiver input imbalance* + + 8.6.1.1 *Slave mode equipment receiver input impedance* + +Slave mode equipment shall meet the same input impedance requirements as specified in § 8.5.1.2 a) for the output impedance. + +32 Fascicle VIII.1 - Rec. V.230 + +##### 8.6.1.2 *Master mode equipment receiver input impedance* + +In the inactive and powered-down states, the following requirements apply: + +- i) The input impedance in the frequency range of 2 kHz to 1 MHz, should exceed the impedance indicated by the template in Figure 11/V.230. This requirement is applicable with an applied sinusoidal voltage of at least 100 mV (r.m.s. value). +- ii) At a frequency of 96 kHz, the peak current which results from an applied voltage of up to 1.2 V (peak value) should not exceed 0.5 mA (peak value). + +*Note* - In some applications, the 100-ohm terminating resistor can be combined with the master mode equipment (see point B of Figure 2/V.230). The resulting impedance is the impedance needed to exceed the combination of the template and the 100-ohm termination. + +#### 8.6.2 *Receiver sensitivity - noise and distortion immunity* + +Requirements applicable to the equipments for three different interface wiring configurations are given in the following sub-paragraphs. Equipment shall receive, without errors (for a period of at least one minute), an input with a pseudo-random sequence (word length $\geq 511$ bits) in all information channels (combination of BV channel, DV channel and, if applicable, the DV-echo channel). + +The receiver shall operate, with any input sequence, over the full range indicated by the waveform mask. + +##### 8.6.2.1 *Slave mode equipment* + +Slave mode equipment shall operate with the input signals conforming to the waveforms specified in § 8.2.1. For the waveforms in Figures 6/V.230 to 8/V.230, slave mode equipment shall operate with the input signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. For signals conforming to the waveform in Figure 5/V.230, operation shall be accomplished for signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 to - 7.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. Additionally, the slave mode equipment shall operate with sinusoidal signals having an amplitude of 100 mV (peak-to-peak value) at frequencies of 200 kHz and 2 MHz superimposed individually on the input signals having the waveform shown in Figure 5/V.230. + +##### 8.6.2.2 *Master mode equipment for short passive bus (fixed timing)* + +Master mode equipment designed to operate with only short passive bus wiring configurations shall operate when receiving input signals indicated by the waveform shown in Figure 16/V.230. Master mode equipment shall operate, with the input signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 dB to - 3.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. + +##### 8.6.2.3 *Master mode equipment for both point-to-point and short passive bus configurations (adaptive timing)* + +Master mode equipment designed to operate with either point-to-point or short passive bus wiring configurations shall operate when receiving input signals indicated by the waveform mask shown in Figure 17/V.230. These master mode equipments shall operate with the input signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 dB to - 3.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. These master mode equipments shall also operate when receiving signals conforming to the waveform in Figure 5/V.230. For signals conforming to this waveform, operation shall be accomplished for signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 to - 7.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. Additionally, these master mode equipments shall operate with the sinusoidal signals, as specified in § 8.6.2.1, superimposed on the input signals having the waveform in Figure 5/V.230. + +![Figure 16/V.230: Short passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph shows normalized amplitude (y-axis, -1.0 to 1.0) versus time in clock periods (x-axis, 0 to 2.0). A shaded region indicates the allowed transition area. Above the graph, a timing diagram shows a 'Master's transmit clock' with a '1 clock period' interval. The shaded region is bounded by two vertical lines, each labeled '-7 %' with arrows indicating the width of the shaded area relative to the clock period. The shaded area is centered around the 0.5 and 1.5 clock period marks.](152efae989544ee653283e8de26cc9b1_img.jpg) + +Master's transmit clock                      Master's transmit clock + +Time (clock periods) + +-7 %                      1 clock period                      -7 % + +Amplitude (normalized) + +0                      0.5                      1.0                      1.5                      2.0 + +T1808990-89 + +Figure 16/V.230: Short passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph shows normalized amplitude (y-axis, -1.0 to 1.0) versus time in clock periods (x-axis, 0 to 2.0). A shaded region indicates the allowed transition area. Above the graph, a timing diagram shows a 'Master's transmit clock' with a '1 clock period' interval. The shaded region is bounded by two vertical lines, each labeled '-7 %' with arrows indicating the width of the shaded area relative to the clock period. The shaded area is centered around the 0.5 and 1.5 clock period marks. + +*Note 1* - Shaded area is the region in which pulse transitions may occur. + +*Note 2* - The waveform mask is based on the "worst case" configuration shown in Annex C, Figure C-1/V.230 and waveforms ii) and iii) in § 8.2.1. The shaded area of -7% of one clock period accounts for the situation of a single slave mode equipment connected directly to the master mode equipment with a zero length passive bus. However, the waveform mask does not show the higher possible amplitude of framing and DV-channel bit pulses and their associated balancing bits. It should be noted that the above waveform mask does not account for transient effects. + +FIGURE 16/V.230 + +###### Short passive bus receive pulse waveform mask + +![Figure 17/V.230: Passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph shows Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis from -1.0 to 1.0 and Time (clock periods) on the x-axis from 0 to 2.0. A shaded region indicates the allowed pulse transition area. The mask is defined by a series of curves that form a rectangular pulse with rounded edges. The top and bottom edges are flat at approximately 0.75 and -0.75 respectively. The rising and falling edges are defined by curves that start at 0 and reach the nominal levels within 1 clock period. The shaded area is bounded by these curves and extends to ±7% of the nominal amplitude. Above the graph, two 'NT transmit clock' waveforms are shown, each with a period of 1 clock period and a width of 7%.](f24d06b5e3b1d8ae12d4893e7619f6f5_img.jpg) + +Figure 17/V.230: Passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph shows Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis from -1.0 to 1.0 and Time (clock periods) on the x-axis from 0 to 2.0. A shaded region indicates the allowed pulse transition area. The mask is defined by a series of curves that form a rectangular pulse with rounded edges. The top and bottom edges are flat at approximately 0.75 and -0.75 respectively. The rising and falling edges are defined by curves that start at 0 and reach the nominal levels within 1 clock period. The shaded area is bounded by these curves and extends to ±7% of the nominal amplitude. Above the graph, two 'NT transmit clock' waveforms are shown, each with a period of 1 clock period and a width of 7%. + +*Note 1* - Shaded area is the region in which pulse transitions may occur. + +*Note 2* - The waveform mask is based on the same "worst case" passive bus configuration as the waveform mask in Figure 16/V.230 except that the permitted round trip delay of the cable is reduced. The shaded area of - 7 % of one clock period accounts for the situation of a single slave mode equipment connected directly to the master mode equipment with a zero length passive bus. However, the waveform mask does not show the higher possible amplitude of framing and DV-channel bit pulses and their associated balancing bits. It should be noted that the above waveform mask does not account for transient effects. + +FIGURE 17/V.230 + +###### **Passive bus receive pulse waveform mask** (Master mode equipment designed to operate with either point-to-point or short passive bus wiring configurations) + +##### 8.6.2.4 Master mode equipment for extended passive bus wiring configurations + +Master mode equipment designed to operate with extended passive bus wiring configurations shall operate when receiving input signals indicated by the waveform mask shown in Figure 18/V.230. These master mode equipments shall operate with the input signals having any amplitude in the range of + 1.5 dB to - 5.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. Additionally, these master mode equipments shall operate with the sinusoidal signals, as specified in § 8.6.2.1, superimposed on the input signals having the waveform shown in Figure 18/V.230. (The above values assume a maximum cable loss of 3.8 dB. Master mode equipment may be implemented to accommodate higher cable loss.) + +##### 8.6.2.5 Master mode equipment for point-to-point configurations only + +Master mode equipment designed to operate with only point-to-point wiring configurations shall operate when receiving input signals having the waveform shown in Figure 5/V.230. These master mode equipments shall operate with the input signals having any amplitude in the range of +1.5 to -7.5 dB relative to the nominal amplitude of the transmitted signal as specified in § 8.5.3.2. Additionally, these master mode equipments shall operate with the sinusoidal signals, as specified in § 8.6.2.1, superimposed on the input signals having the waveform shown in Figure 5/V.230. + +![Figure 18/V.230: Extended passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph plots Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis (from -1.0 to 1.0) against Time (clock periods) on the x-axis (from 0 to 2.0). A shaded region indicates the area where pulse transitions may occur. The mask shows a series of curves that define the acceptable amplitude range for a pulse transition over time. The shaded area is bounded by a series of curves that start at approximately ±0.6 at time 0, drop to a minimum of about ±0.2 at 0.5 clock periods, and then rise back to ±0.6 by 1.0 clock periods. This pattern repeats, with another shaded region between 1.5 and 2.0 clock periods. The curves are symmetric about the zero-amplitude line.](f899c67120dc04a5e5a5c2d94461a077_img.jpg) + +Figure 18/V.230: Extended passive bus receive pulse waveform mask. The graph plots Amplitude (normalized) on the y-axis (from -1.0 to 1.0) against Time (clock periods) on the x-axis (from 0 to 2.0). A shaded region indicates the area where pulse transitions may occur. The mask shows a series of curves that define the acceptable amplitude range for a pulse transition over time. The shaded area is bounded by a series of curves that start at approximately ±0.6 at time 0, drop to a minimum of about ±0.2 at 0.5 clock periods, and then rise back to ±0.6 by 1.0 clock periods. This pattern repeats, with another shaded region between 1.5 and 2.0 clock periods. The curves are symmetric about the zero-amplitude line. + +*Note 1* - Shaded area is the region in which pulse transitions may occur. + +*Note 2* - The waveform mask is based on the worst case extended passive bus wiring configuration. It consists of a cable having a characteristic impedance of 75 ohms, a capacitance of 120 nF/km, a loss of 3.8 dB at 96 kHz, four slave mode equipments connected such that the differential delay is at the maximum permitted by § 8.6.3.3. The waveform mask does not show the higher possible amplitude of framing and DV-channel bit pulses and their associated balancing bits. It should be noted that the above waveform mask does not account for transient effects. + +FIGURE 18/V.230 + +###### Extended passive bus receive pulse waveform mask + +#### 8.6.3 Master mode equipment receiver input delay characteristics + +*Note* - Round trip delay is always measured between the zero-volt crossings of the framing pulse and its associated balance bit pulse at the transmit and receive sides of the master mode equipment (see also Annex A). + +##### 8.6.3.1 Master mode equipment for short passive bus + +Master mode equipment shall accommodate round trip delays of the complete installation, including slave mode equipment, in the range 10 to 14 $\mu\text{s}$ . + +##### 8.6.3.2 Master mode equipment for both point-to-point and passive bus + +Master mode equipment shall accommodate round trip delays (for passive bus configurations) in the range 10 to 13 $\mu\text{s}$ . + +Master mode equipment shall accommodate round trip delays (for point-to-point configurations) in the range 10 to 42 $\mu\text{s}$ . + +##### 8.6.3.3 Master mode equipment for extended passive bus + +Master mode equipment shall accommodate round trip delays in the range 10 to 42 $\mu\text{s}$ , provided that the differential delay of signals from different slave mode equipments is in the range 0 to 2 $\mu\text{s}$ . + +##### 8.6.3.4 Master mode equipment for point-to-point only + +Master mode equipment shall accommodate round trip delays specified in § 8.6.3.2 for point-to-point configurations. + +#### 8.6.4 *Unbalance about earth* + +Longitudinal conversion loss (LCL) of receiver inputs, measured in accordance with Recommendation G.117, § 4.1.3, by considering the power feeding and two 100-ohm terminations at each port, shall meet the following requirements (see Figure 14/V.230): + +- a) $10 \text{ kHz} \leq f \leq 300 \text{ kHz}$ : $\geq 54 \text{ dB}$ +- b) $300 \text{ kHz} < f \leq 1 \text{ MHz}$ : minimum value decreasing from 54 dB with 20 dB/decade. + +### 8.7 *Isolation from external voltages* + +The electrical environment of interface cable pairs is not specified in this Recommendation. + +IEC Publication 479-1, Second Issue 1984, specifies current limitations dealing with human safety. According to that publication, the value of a touchable leakage alternating current measured through a resistor of 2 kOhms is to be limited to 9 mA. The application of this requirement to the user-network interface is not a subject of this Recommendation. + +It may be necessary to apportion this value between the number of mains powered equipments connected to the passive bus. A possible maximum value of (touchable) leakage alternating current for each mains powered equipment could be 1 mA. However, it should be noted that leakage current of a fraction of this magnitude may interfere with the satisfactory operation of the equipments. + +### 8.8 *Interconnecting media characteristics* + +Longitudinal conversion loss of pairs at 96 kHz shall be $\geq 43 \text{ dB}$ . + +### 8.9 *Standard GDCI access cord* + +A connecting cord designed to connect equipment to a jack on a passive bus cable must meet the requirements specified in Recommendation I.430 for the "standard ISDN basic access TE cord". + +## 9 **Power feeding** + +Power feeding across the General Data Communication Interface is not required by this Recommendation. All equipment should be capable of operating if power is present in accordance with Recommendation I.430, § 9. In the case of a GDCI application which uses power feed across the interface, power source 2 defined in Recommendation I.430 should be the first choice, followed by either power source 1 or power source 3. Any considerations for operation under restricted power conditions are at the discretion of the application. + +## 10 **Interface connector and contact assignments** + +The interface connector and contact assignments are the subject of an ISO standard. Table 7/V.230 is reproduced from the Draft International Standard, DIS 8877, dated November 1985. For the transmit and receive leads, pole numbers 3 through 6, the polarity indicated is for the polarity of the framing pulses. For the power leads, pole numbers 1, 2, 7 and 8, the polarity indicated is for the polarity of the d.c. voltages. See Figure 20/I.430 for the polarity of power provided in the phantom mode. In that figure, the leads that are lettered a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h correspond with pole numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 5, 4, 7 and 8, respectively. + +TABLE 7/V.230 + +### **Pole (contact) assignment for 8-pole connections (plugs and jacks)** + +| Pole number | Function | | Polarity | +|-------------|----------------------|-----------------------|----------| +| | Slave mode equipment | Master mode equipment | | +| 1 | Power source 3 | Power sink 3 | + | +| 2 | Power source 3 | Power sink 3 | - | +| 3 | Transmit | Receive | + | +| 4 | Receive | Transmit | + | +| 5 | Receive | Transmit | - | +| 6 | Transmit | Receive | - | +| 7 | Power sink 2 | Power source 2 | - | +| 8 | Power sink 2 | Power source 2 | + | + +*Note* - This reference is only provisional. + +# ANNEX A + +(to Recommendation V.230) + +## **Wiring configurations and round trip delay considerations used as a basis for electrical characteristics** + +### A.1 *Introduction* + +A.1.1 In § 4 of this Recommendation, two major wiring arrangements are identified. These are point-to-point configuration and a point-to-multipoint configuration using a passive bus. + +While these configurations may be considered to be the limiting cases for the definition of the interfaces and the design of the associated equipments, other significant arrangements should be considered. + +A.1.2 The values of overall length, in terms of cable loss and delay assumed for each of the possible arrangements, are indicated below. + +A.1.3 Figure 2/V.230 is a composite of the individual configurations. These individual configurations are shown in this Annex. + +### A.2 *Wiring configurations* + +#### A.2.1 *Point-to-multipoint* + +A.2.1.1 The point-to-multipoint wiring configuration identified in § 4.2 of this Recommendation may be provided by the "short passive bus" or other configurations such as "extended passive bus". + +##### A.2.1.2 *Short passive bus* (Figure A-1/V.230) + +An essential configuration to be considered is a passive bus in which the slave mode devices may be connected at random points along the full length of the cable. This means that the master mode equipment receiver must cater for pulses arriving with different delays from various terminals. For this reason, the length limit for this configuration is a function of the maximum round trip delay and not of the attenuation. + +A master mode equipment receiver with fixed timing can be used if the round trip delay is between 10 to 14 $\mu$ s. This relates to a maximum operational distance from the master mode equipment in the order of 100-200 m ( $d_2$ in Figure A-1/V.230) [200 m in the case of a high impedance cable ( $Z_c = 150$ ohms) and 100 m in the case of a low impedance cable ( $Z_c = 75$ ohms)]. It should be noted that the slave master equipment connections acts as stubs on the cable, thus reducing the master mode equipment receiver margin over that of a point-to-point configuration. A maximum number of 8 slave mode equipments with connections of 10 m in length are to be accommodated. + +The range of 10 to 14 $\mu$ s for the round trip delay is composed as follows. The lower value of 10 $\mu$ s is composed of two bits offset delay (see Figure 3/V.230) and the negative phase deviation of -7% (see § 8.2.3). In this case the slave mode equipment is located directly at the master mode equipment. The higher value of 14 $\mu$ s is calculated assuming the slave mode equipment is located at the far end of a passive bus. This value is composed of the offset delay between frames of two bits (10.4 $\mu$ s), the round trip delay of the unloaded bus installation (2 $\mu$ s), the additional delay due to load of the slave mode equipment (i.e., 0.7 $\mu$ s) and the maximum delay of the slave mode equipment transmitter according to § 8.2.3 (15% = 0.8 $\mu$ s). + +![Diagram of a short passive bus configuration. A horizontal line represents the bus. At the left end is a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor). At the right end is a box labeled 'M' (Master). Three boxes labeled 'S' (Slave) are connected to the bus via vertical lines. A dashed line at the far left indicates the start of the bus. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd2' spans the distance from the 'TR' box to the 'M' box. A dashed box labeled 'M' is positioned above the bus line, with a 'Note' label next to it. The reference number 'T1700540-89' is at the bottom right.](95e259e8cb3519025066052af263f8c0_img.jpg) + +Diagram of a short passive bus configuration. A horizontal line represents the bus. At the left end is a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor). At the right end is a box labeled 'M' (Master). Three boxes labeled 'S' (Slave) are connected to the bus via vertical lines. A dashed line at the far left indicates the start of the bus. A double-headed arrow labeled 'd2' spans the distance from the 'TR' box to the 'M' box. A dashed box labeled 'M' is positioned above the bus line, with a 'Note' label next to it. The reference number 'T1700540-89' is at the bottom right. + +TR     Terminating resistor +M     Master +S     Slave + +*Note* - In principle, the master mode equipment may be located at any point along the passive bus. The electrical characteristics in this Recommendation, however, are based on the master mode equipment located at one end. The conditions related to other locations require confirmation. + +FIGURE A-1/V.230 + +##### Short passive bus + +##### A.2.1.3 Extended passive bus (Figure A-2/V.230) + +A configuration which may be used at an intermediate distance in the order of 100 m and 1000 m is known as an extended passive bus. This configuration takes advantage of the fact that terminal connection points are restricted to a grouping at the far end of the cable from the master mode equipment. This places a restriction on the differential distance between slave mode equipments. The differential round trip delay is defined as that between zero-volt crossings of signals from different slave mode equipments and is restricted to 2 $\mu$ s. + +This differential round trip delay is composed of a slave mode equipment differential delay of 22% or 1.15 $\mu$ s according to § 8.2.3, the round trip delay of the unloaded bus installation of 0.5 $\mu$ s (line length: 25 to 50 m) and an additional delay due to the load of 4 slave mode equipments (0.35 $\mu$ s). + +$d_3$ depends on the characteristics of the cable to be used. + +The objective for this extended passive bus configuration is a total length of at least 500 m ( $d_4$ in Figure A-2/V.230) and a differential distance between slave mode equipment connection points of 25 to 50 m ( $d_3$ in Figure A-2/V.230). However, an appropriate combination of the total length, the differential distance between slave mode equipment connection points, and the number of slave mode equipments connected to the cable, may be determined by individual Administrations. + +![Diagram of an extended passive bus configuration. A horizontal line represents the cable. At the left end, a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor) is connected to the cable. Below the cable, two boxes labeled 'S' (Slave) are connected at different points. The distance between these two slave connection points is labeled 'd3'. At the right end, a box labeled 'TR' is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'M' (Master). The total length of the cable between the two terminating resistors is labeled 'd4'. The reference code 'T1700550-89' is at the bottom right.](4ae4505e885586e481a3ad3bff5198b7_img.jpg) + +Diagram of an extended passive bus configuration. A horizontal line represents the cable. At the left end, a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor) is connected to the cable. Below the cable, two boxes labeled 'S' (Slave) are connected at different points. The distance between these two slave connection points is labeled 'd3'. At the right end, a box labeled 'TR' is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'M' (Master). The total length of the cable between the two terminating resistors is labeled 'd4'. The reference code 'T1700550-89' is at the bottom right. + +TR Terminating resistor +M Master +S Slave + +FIGURE A-2/V.230 + +##### Extended passive bus + +#### A.2.2 Point-to-point (Figure A-3/V.230) + +This configuration provides for one transmitter/receiver only at each end of the cable (see Figure A-3/V.230). It is, therefore, necessary to determine the maximum permissible attenuation between the ends of the cable to establish the transmitter output level and the range of receiver input levels. In addition, it is necessary to establish the maximum round trip delay for any signal which must be returned from one end to the other within a specified time period (limited by DV-echo bits). + +A general objective for the operational distance between equipment units is 1.0 km ( $d_1$ in Figure A-3/V.230). It is agreed to satisfy this general objective with a maximum cable attenuation of 6 dB at 96 kHz. The round trip delay is between 10 to 42 $\mu$ s. + +![Diagram of a point-to-point configuration. A horizontal line represents the cable. At the left end, a box labeled 'S' (Slave) is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor). At the right end, a box labeled 'TR' is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'M' (Master). The total length of the cable between the two terminating resistors is labeled 'd1'. The reference code 'T1700560-89' is at the bottom right.](50214d232017279410e9c9db8eb75119_img.jpg) + +Diagram of a point-to-point configuration. A horizontal line represents the cable. At the left end, a box labeled 'S' (Slave) is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'TR' (Terminating resistor). At the right end, a box labeled 'TR' is connected to the cable, followed by a box labeled 'M' (Master). The total length of the cable between the two terminating resistors is labeled 'd1'. The reference code 'T1700560-89' is at the bottom right. + +TR Terminating resistor +M Master +S Slave + +FIGURE A-3/V.320 + +##### Point-to-point + +The lower value of 10 $\mu\text{s}$ is derived in the same way as for the passive bus configuration. The upper value is composed of the following elements: + +- 2 bits due to frame offset ( $2 \times 5.2 \mu\text{s} = 10.4 \mu\text{s}$ , see § 5.4.2.3); +- maximum 6 bits delay permitted due to the distance between master and slave devices and the required processing time ( $6 \times 5.2 \mu\text{s} = 31.2 \mu\text{s}$ ); +- the fraction (+ 15%) of a bit period due to phase deviation between slave mode equipment input and output (see § 8.2.3, $0.15 \times 5.2 \mu\text{s} = 0.8 \mu\text{s}$ ). + +It should be noted that an adaptive timing device at the receiver is required at the master mode equipment to meet these limits. + +For the master mode equipment used for point-to-point and passive bus configurations (see § 8.6.3.2), the tolerable round trip delay in passive bus wiring configurations is reduced to 13 $\mu\text{s}$ due to the extra tolerance required for the adaptive timing. Using this type of wiring configuration, it is also possible to provide point-to-multipoint mode of operation at layer 1. + +*Note* - Point-to-multipoint operation can be accommodated using only point-to-point wiring. One suitable arrangement is STAR illustrated in Figure A-4/V.230. In such an implementation, bit streams from slave mode equipments must be buffered to provide for operation of the DV-echo channel(s) to provide for contention resolution, but only layer 1 functionality is required. It is also possible to support passive bus wiring configurations on the ports of STARS. + +![Diagram of a Star configuration showing two slave devices (S) connected to a central master device (M) via terminating resistors (TR).](9a14684f8ae1345c6efea6f5994c730c_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a Star configuration. On the left, two slave devices, labeled 'S', are shown. Each slave is connected to a terminating resistor, labeled 'TR', with a current $I_A$ indicated. Solid lines connect these 'TR' components to a central master device, labeled 'M (STAR)'. The master device also has its own terminating resistor, labeled 'TR', with a current $I_B$ indicated. A dashed line connects the two 'S' devices. The master device 'M' is labeled with the reference number 'T1700570-89'. + +Diagram of a Star configuration showing two slave devices (S) connected to a central master device (M) via terminating resistors (TR). + +| | | +|----|----------------------| +| TR | Terminating resistor | +| M | Master | +| S | Slave | + +FIGURE A-4/V.230 + +**Star** + +(to Recommendation V.230) + +##### SDL representation of a possible implementation of the DV-channel access + +![Flowchart of DV-channel access implementation. The process starts with Layer 1 entering the activated state, setting X1=8, X2=10, F=0, and C=0. It enters a WAIT state. Two main paths are shown: one for 'E-bit received' and another for 'Data request detected and accepted'. The 'E-bit received' path checks if C=1, then C=11, then increments C and checks thresholds X1 and X2. The 'Data request detected and accepted' path checks priority class (1 or 2) and sets F=1. Both paths lead to a decision C ≥ Xi. If yes, it sends the first data bit D and waits for an E-bit. If D=E, it checks for more D-bits and sends them if available. A legend defines variables: D (DV-channel bit), E (DV-echo-channel bit), F (Flag indicating that frame is pending), C (Number of consecutive ones detected on the DV-echo-channel), X1 (Threshold for priority class 1), X2 (Threshold for priority class 2), and i (Priority class indicator).](32ff77da4286b58c4778033acaa10836_img.jpg) + +Layer 1 enters the activated state + +``` + +graph TD + Start([Layer 1 enters the activated state]) --> Init[X1 = 8 +X2 = 10] + Init --> F0[F = 0] + F0 --> C0[C = 0] + C0 --> Wait([WAIT]) + + Wait --> Ebit{E-bit received} + Wait --> DataReq{Data request detected and accepted} + + Ebit -- No --> C1{C = 1} + C1 -- Yes --> C11{C = 11} + C11 -- No --> Cinc[C = C + 1] + Cinc --> CX1{C ≥ X1} + CX1 -- No --> Wait + CX1 -- Yes --> X1val[X1 = 8] + X1val --> CX2{C ≥ X2} + CX2 -- No --> Wait + CX2 -- Yes --> X2val[X2 = 10] + X2val --> F1{F = 1} + F1 -- No --> Wait + F1 -- Yes --> CXi{C ≥ Xi} + + DataReq --> Prio{Priority class?} + Prio -- 1 --> i1[i = 1] + Prio -- 2 --> i2[i = 2] + i1 --> F1 + i2 --> F1 + + CXi -- No --> Wait + CXi -- Yes --> SendD[Send 1st data bit D] + SendD --> WaitEbit([Wait for E-bit]) + WaitEbit --> Ebit2{E-bit} + Ebit2 --> DE{D = E} + DE -- No --> C2{C = 2} + DE -- Yes --> MoreD{More D-bit?} + MoreD -- No --> CXi + MoreD -- Yes --> SendNextD[Send next D-bit] + SendNextD --> CXi + + CXi --> End([1]) + +``` + +CCITT-60900 + +D DV-channel bit + E DV-echo-channel bit + F Flag indicating that frame is pending + C Number of consecutive ones detected on the DV-echo-channel + X1 Threshold for priority class 1 + X2 Threshold for priority class 2 + i Priority class indicator + +Flowchart of DV-channel access implementation. The process starts with Layer 1 entering the activated state, setting X1=8, X2=10, F=0, and C=0. It enters a WAIT state. Two main paths are shown: one for 'E-bit received' and another for 'Data request detected and accepted'. The 'E-bit received' path checks if C=1, then C=11, then increments C and checks thresholds X1 and X2. The 'Data request detected and accepted' path checks priority class (1 or 2) and sets F=1. Both paths lead to a decision C ≥ Xi. If yes, it sends the first data bit D and waits for an E-bit. If D=E, it checks for more D-bits and sends them if available. A legend defines variables: D (DV-channel bit), E (DV-echo-channel bit), F (Flag indicating that frame is pending), C (Number of consecutive ones detected on the DV-echo-channel), X1 (Threshold for priority class 1), X2 (Threshold for priority class 2), and i (Priority class indicator). + +(to Recommendation V.230) + +##### **Test configurations** + +In § 8 of this Recommendation, waveforms are shown for testing master and slave mode equipment. This Annex describes configurations, for testing slave mode equipment, which can be used to generate these waveforms (see Figure C-1/V.230). Similar configurations can be used to test master mode equipment. + +Table C-1/V.230 gives the parameters for the artificial lines reproduced in Figure C-1/V.230. The artificial lines are used to derive the waveforms. For test configurations ii) and iii), the cable length used corresponds to a signal delay of 1 $\mu$ s. + +![Four test configurations (i, ii, iii, iv) for testing slave mode equipment. Configuration i) is point-to-point with a master (M) connected to an artificial line (high capacitance, 6 dB) and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to another 100 Ω resistor and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration ii) is a short passive bus with a master (M) connected to an artificial line (high capacitance) and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a 7-terminal equivalent input impedance and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration iii) is a short passive bus with a slave (S) connected to an artificial line (a) high capacitance, b) low capacitance, and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a 7-terminal equivalent input impedance and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration iv) is an ideal test signal with a slave (S) connected to two 100 Ω resistors and a 50 Ω resistor.](67d03c9e89620d73e3786c869e559752_img.jpg) + +**Configuration i) Point-to-point** + +**Configuration ii) Short passive bus** + +**Configuration iii) Short passive bus** + +**Configuration iv) Ideal test signal** + +M Master +S Slave + +Four test configurations (i, ii, iii, iv) for testing slave mode equipment. Configuration i) is point-to-point with a master (M) connected to an artificial line (high capacitance, 6 dB) and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to another 100 Ω resistor and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration ii) is a short passive bus with a master (M) connected to an artificial line (high capacitance) and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a 7-terminal equivalent input impedance and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration iii) is a short passive bus with a slave (S) connected to an artificial line (a) high capacitance, b) low capacitance, and a 100 Ω resistor, which is then connected to a 7-terminal equivalent input impedance and a 50 Ω resistor. Configuration iv) is an ideal test signal with a slave (S) connected to two 100 Ω resistors and a 50 Ω resistor. + +FIGURE C-1/V.230 + +##### **Test configurations** + +TABLE C-1/V.230 + +##### **Parameters for the artificial lines** + +| Parameters | High capacitance cable | Low capacitance cable | +|-------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------| +| R (96 kHz) | 160 ohms/km | 160 ohms/km | +| C (1 kHz) | 120 nF/km | 30 nF/km | +| Z 0 (96 kHz) | 75 ohms | 150 ohms | +| Wire diameter | 0.6 mm | 0.6 mm | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.24-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.24-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc674c5fcd69ba8faf0ec95ed517d5b7667dfe17 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.24-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,882 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.24 + +(02/2000) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interfaces and voiceband modems + +--- + +**List of definitions for interchange circuits +between data terminal equipment (DTE) and +data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE)** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.24 + +(Formerly CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# **LIST OF DEFINITIONS FOR INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS BETWEEN DATA TERMINAL EQUIPMENT (DTE) AND DATA CIRCUIT-TERMINATING EQUIPMENT (DCE)** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation applies to the interconnecting circuits being called interchange circuits at the interface between DTE and DCE for the transfer of binary data, control and timing signals as appropriate. This Recommendation also applies to both sides of separate intermediate equipment, which may be inserted between these two classes of equipment. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.24 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 16 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on 17 February 2000. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2001 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 1.1 Range of application ..... | 1 | +| 1.2 Applicable electrical characteristics..... | 2 | +| 1.3 Applicable mechanical characteristics ..... | 2 | +| 1.4 Allocation of functionalities ..... | 2 | +| 2 Line of demarcation ..... | 2 | +| 3 Definitions of interchange circuits..... | 2 | +| 3.1 Circuit 102 – Signal ground or common return ..... | 4 | +| 3.2 Circuit 102a – DTE common return ..... | 4 | +| 3.3 Circuit 102b – DCE common return..... | 4 | +| 3.4 Circuit 102c – Common return ..... | 4 | +| 3.5 Circuit 103 – Transmitted data ..... | 4 | +| 3.6 Circuit 104 – Received data..... | 5 | +| 3.7 Circuit 105 – Request to send ..... | 5 | +| 3.8 Circuit 106 – Ready for sending ..... | 5 | +| 3.9 Circuit 107 – Data set ready..... | 5 | +| 3.10 Circuit 108/1 – Connect data set to line..... | 6 | +| 3.11 Circuit 108/2 – Data terminal ready..... | 6 | +| 3.12 Circuit 109 – Data channel received line signal detector..... | 7 | +| 3.13 Circuit 111 – Data signalling rate selector (DTE source)..... | 7 | +| 3.14 Circuit 112 – Data signalling rate selector (DCE source)..... | 7 | +| 3.15 Circuit 113 – Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source) ..... | 7 | +| 3.16 Circuit 114 – Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source)..... | 8 | +| 3.17 Circuit 115 – Receiver signal element timing (DCE source)..... | 8 | +| 3.18 Circuit 116/1 – Back-up switching in direct mode ..... | 8 | +| 3.19 Circuit 116/2 – Back-up switching in authorized mode ..... | 9 | +| 3.20 Circuit 117 – Standby indicator ..... | 9 | +| 3.21 Circuit 118 – Transmitted backward channel data ..... | 9 | +| 3.22 Circuit 119 – Received backward channel data ..... | 9 | +| 3.23 Circuit 120 – Transmit backward channel line signal ..... | 9 | +| 3.24 Circuit 121 – Backward channel ready ..... | 9 | +| 3.25 Circuit 122 – Backward channel received line signal detector..... | 10 | +| 3.26 Circuit 125 – Calling indicator ..... | 10 | +| 3.27 Circuit 126 – Select transmit frequency..... | 10 | + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 3.28 Circuit 128 – Receiver signal element timing (DTE source)..... | 10 | +| 3.29 Circuit 131 – Received character timing (DCE source) ..... | 10 | +| 3.30 Circuit 133 – Ready for receiving..... | 11 | +| 3.31 Circuit 134 – Received data present ..... | 11 | +| 3.32 Circuit 135 – Received energy present ..... | 11 | +| 3.33 Circuit 137 – Transmitted character timing (DTE source)..... | 11 | +| 3.34 Circuit 138 – Transmitted character timing (DCE source)..... | 12 | +| 3.35 Circuit 140 – Loopback/Maintenance test ..... | 12 | +| 3.36 Circuit 141 – Local loopback..... | 12 | +| 3.37 Circuit 142 – Test indicator ..... | 13 | +| 4 Operational requirements..... | 13 | +| 4.1 Data circuits and timing circuits ..... | 13 | +| 4.1.1 Data circuits..... | 13 | +| 4.1.2 Timing circuits..... | 13 | +| 4.2 Control and indication circuits..... | 14 | +| 4.2.1 Operation of circuits 107, 108/1 and 108/2 ..... | 14 | +| 4.2.2 Circuit 125 – Calling indicator ..... | 15 | +| 4.2.3 Usage of circuit 126..... | 15 | +| 4.2.4 Circuit 140 – Loopback/Maintenance Test ..... | 15 | +| 4.3 Miscellaneous ..... | 15 | +| 4.3.1 Interrelationship of circuits 103, 105 and 106..... | 15 | +| 4.3.2 Idle periods ..... | 16 | +| 4.3.3 Clamping ..... | 16 | +| 4.4 Circuit failures (electrical) ..... | 17 | +| 4.5 Provision of interchange circuits in DCEs and DTEs..... | 17 | +| 4.6 Data flow control ..... | 17 | +| 4.7 Power-up considerations..... | 17 | +| 5 References..... | 17 | + +## Recommendation V.24 + +# LIST OF DEFINITIONS FOR INTERCHANGE CIRCUITS BETWEEN DATA TERMINAL EQUIPMENT (DTE) AND DATA CIRCUIT-TERMINATING EQUIPMENT (DCE) + +(Geneva, 1964, amended at Mar del Plata, 1968, Geneva, 1972, 1976 and 1980, +Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984, Melbourne, 1988, Helsinki, 1993, Geneva, 1996 and 2000) + +# 1 Scope + +## 1.1 Range of application + +This Recommendation applies to the interconnecting circuits being called interchange circuits at the interface between DTE and DCE for the transfer of binary data, control and timing signals as appropriate. This Recommendation also applies to both sides of separate intermediate equipment, which may be inserted between these two classes of equipment (see Figure 1). + +![Diagram illustrating the general layout of equipment for V.24 interfaces. It shows a DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and a DCE (Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment) on the right, connected by a 'Line'. Between them is 'Intermediate equipment (e.g. error control)'. The diagram shows multiple horizontal lines representing data paths. On the left, a 'V.24 interface' is indicated with a downward arrow. On the right, another 'V.24 interface' is indicated with a downward arrow. A 'Line of demarcation' is shown between the DTE and the intermediate equipment. Selections A, B, and C are marked on the lines. Selection A is on the line between DTE and intermediate equipment. Selection B is on the line between intermediate equipment and DCE. Selection C is on the line between DCE and the Line. The diagram is labeled T1400030-93 at the bottom right.](0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg) + +T1400030-93 + +Diagram illustrating the general layout of equipment for V.24 interfaces. It shows a DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and a DCE (Data Circuit-Terminating Equipment) on the right, connected by a 'Line'. Between them is 'Intermediate equipment (e.g. error control)'. The diagram shows multiple horizontal lines representing data paths. On the left, a 'V.24 interface' is indicated with a downward arrow. On the right, another 'V.24 interface' is indicated with a downward arrow. A 'Line of demarcation' is shown between the DTE and the intermediate equipment. Selections A, B, and C are marked on the lines. Selection A is on the line between DTE and intermediate equipment. Selection B is on the line between intermediate equipment and DCE. Selection C is on the line between DCE and the Line. The diagram is labeled T1400030-93 at the bottom right. + +NOTE – Without intermediate equipment, the selections A and B are identical. +Selection C may be a selection specifically for automatic calling. + +**Figure 1/V24 – Illustration of general layout of equipment** + +The range of interchange circuits defined in this Recommendation is applicable, for example: + +- a) to synchronous and asynchronous data communications; +- b) to data transmission on leased line service, either 2-wire or 4-wire, either point-to-point or multipoint operation; +- c) to data transmission on switched network service, either 2-wire or 4-wire; + +A DTE/DCE interface conforming to this Recommendation may also be used for attachment to a Public Data Network (PDN). For these cases, additional information on interchange circuit implementation and operational requirements may be found in Recommendations X.20 *bis* and X.21 *bis*. + +In any type of practical equipment a selection will be made from the range of interchange circuits defined in this Recommendation, as appropriate. + +The actual interchange circuits to be used in a particular DCE are those indicated in the appropriate Recommendation. + +The required interchange circuits specified in the DCE Recommendations which make reference to this Recommendation apply only to the DCE side of the interface. Only those circuits necessary to assure satisfactory operation of the application the DTE is intending to support need be controlled or monitored by the DTE (see 4.5 for proper handling of unimplemented circuits). + +The usage and operational requirements of certain interchange circuits and the interaction between them are specified in clause 4. For proper operation of the DCE it is important that the guidelines in clause 4 be observed. + +## **1.2 Applicable electrical characteristics** + +Electrical characteristics for interchange circuits are specified in Recommendations V.10, V.11, V.12, V.28, V.31 and V.31 *bis*. + +## **1.3 Applicable mechanical characteristics** + +For mechanical characteristics of the interface, refer to ISO/IEC 2110 (25-pole), ISO/IEC 11569 (26-pole), ISO/IEC 13575 (50-pole) or ISO/IEC 4902 (37-pole) as appropriate. + +## **1.4 Allocation of functionalities** + +The DCE may include signal converters, timing generators, pulse regenerators, and control circuitry, together with equipment to provide functions such as error control, automatic calling and automatic answering. Some of these functions may be implemented in separate intermediate equipment or in the DTE. + +# **2 Line of demarcation** + +The interface between DTE and DCE is located at a connector, which is the interchange point between these two classes of equipment. + +The interface connector will not necessarily be physically attached to the DCE and may be mounted in a fixed position near the DTE. + +An interconnecting cable or cables will normally be provided with the DTE. It is recommended to keep the cables as short as possible. Their lengths should be limited by the load capacitance and other electrical characteristics specified in the relevant Recommendation on electrical characteristics (see 1.2). + +# **3 Definitions of interchange circuits** + +A list of these interchange circuits is presented in Table 1. + +NOTE – Compared to earlier versions of this Recommendation, Table 1 and the definitions below summarize fewer interchange circuits, and some circuit numbers are void. Interchange circuits for which no practical application has become known or whose application has ceased have been removed, e.g. the 200-series of interchange circuits for parallel automatic calling in accordance with earlier versions of Recommendation V.25 and interchange circuits relevant for modems employing parallel data transmission in accordance with former Recommendation V.20. + +**Table 1/V.24 – Interchange circuits by category** + +| Inter-change circuit number | Interchange circuit name | Ground | Data | | Control | | Timing | | +|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------| +| | | | From DCE | To DCE | From DCE | To DCE | From DCE | To DCE | +| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | +| 102 | Signal ground or common return | X | | | | | | | +| 102a | DTE common return | X | | | | | | | +| 102b | DCE common return | X | | | | | | | +| 102c | Common return | X | | | | | | | +| 103 | Transmitted data | | | X | | | | | +| 104 | Received data | | X | | | | | | +| 105 | Request to send | | | | | X | | | +| 106 | Ready for sending | | | | X | | | | +| 107 | Data set ready | | | | X | | | | +| 108/1 | Connect data set to line | | | | | X | | | +| 108/2 | Data terminal ready | | | | | X | | | +| 109 | Data channel received line signal detector | | | | X | | | | +| 111 | Data signal rate selector (DTE) | | | | | X | | | +| 112 | Data signal rate selector (DCE) | | | | X | | | | +| 113 | Transmitter signal element timing (DTE) | | | | | | | X | +| 114 | Transmitter signal element timing (DCE) | | | | | | X | | +| 115 | Receiver signal element timing (DCE) | | | | | | X | | +| 116/1 | Back-up switching in direct mode | | | | | X | | | +| 116/2 | Back-up switching in authorized mode | | | | | X | | | +| 117 | Standby indicator | | | | X | | | | +| 118 | Transmitted backward channel data | | | X | | | | | +| 119 | Received backward channel data | | X | | | | | | +| 120 | Transmit backward channel line signal | | | | | X | | | +| 121 | Backward channel ready | | | | X | | | | +| 122 | Backward channel received line signal detector | | | | X | | | | +| 125 | Calling indicator | | | | X | | | | +| 126 | Select transmit frequency | | | | | X | | | +| 128 | Receiver signal element timing (DTE) | | | | | | | X | +| 131 | Received character timing (DCE source) | | | | | | X | | +| 133 | Ready for receiving | | | | | X | | | +| 134 | Received data present | | | | X | | | | +| 135 | Received energy present | | | | X | | | | +| 137 | Transmitted character timing (DTE source) | | | | | | | X | +| 138 | Transmitted character timing (DCE source) | | | | | | X | | +| 140 | Loopback/Maintenance test | | | | | X | | | +| 141 | Local loopback | | | | | X | | | +| 142 | Test indicator | | | | X | | | | + +## **3.1 Circuit 102 – Signal ground or common return** + +This conductor establishes the signal common return for unbalanced interchange circuits with electrical characteristics according to Recommendation V.28 and the d.c. reference potential for interchange circuits according to Recommendations V.10 and V.11. + +Within the DTE, this circuit should be brought to one point, and it should be possible to connect this point to protective ground or earth by means of a metallic strap within the equipment. This metallic strap can be connected or removed at installation, as may be required to meet applicable safety regulations or to minimize the introduction of noise into electronic circuitry. Caution should be exercised to prevent the establishment of ground loops carrying high currents. + +## **3.2 Circuit 102a – DTE common return** + +This conductor is connected to the DTE circuit common return and is used as the reference potential for the unbalanced V.10-type interchange circuit receivers within the DCE. + +## **3.3 Circuit 102b – DCE common return** + +This conductor is connected to the DCE circuit common return and is used as the reference potential for the unbalanced V.10-type interchange circuit receivers within the DTE. + +NOTE – Two arrangements exist for the case where a mixture of V.10 and V.11 circuits is used in the same interface: + +- 1) The DTE common return and the DCE common return are both connected to circuit 102. This arrangement is particularly useful where the need to conserve pole assignments is a requirement [10] and [12]. It should, however, be noted that only category 2 receivers as specified in clause 9/V.10 can be used in this case, and that the usable interface cable length may be shorter than specified in Appendix II/V.10. +- 2) Separate provision is made for the V.10 common return circuits 102a and 102b, and for a d.c. reference potential conductor circuit 102 [11]. + +## **3.4 Circuit 102c – Common return** + +This conductor establishes the signal common return for single-current interchange circuits controlled by contact closure with electrical characteristics according to Recommendation V.31, in cases where a common return is used. + +Within the equipment containing the signal source of the interchange circuit, this conductor shall be isolated from signal ground and protective ground, irrespective of whether it is located within the DCE or within the DTE. + +## **3.5 Circuit 103 – Transmitted data** + +Direction: To DCE + +The data signals originated by the DTE: + +- 1) to be transmitted via a data channel to one or more remote data stations; + - 2) to be passed to the DCE for maintenance test purposes under control of the DTE; or + - 3) for the programming or control of serial automatic calling DCEs, +- are transferred on this circuit to the DCE. + +## **3.6 Circuit 104 – Received data** + +Direction: From DCE + +The data signals generated by the DCE: + +- 1) in response to data channel line signals received from a remote data station; +- 2) in response to the DTE maintenance test signals; or +- 3) in response to (or as an echo of) programming or control signals from the DTE where a serial automatic calling facility is implemented in the DCE, + +are transferred on this circuit to the DTE. + +NOTE – The reception conditions for maintenance test signals are specified with circuit 107. + +### **3.7 Circuit 105 – Request to send** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit control the data channel transmit function of the DCE. + +The ON condition causes the DCE to assume the data channel transmit mode. + +The OFF condition causes the DCE to assume the data channel non-transmit mode, when all data transferred on circuit 103 have been transmitted. + +## **3.8 Circuit 106 – Ready for sending** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether the DCE is prepared to accept data signals for transmission on the data channel or for maintenance test purposes under control of the DTE. + +The ON condition indicates that the DCE is prepared to accept data signals from the DTE. + +The OFF condition indicates that the DCE is not prepared to accept data signals from the DTE. + +### **3.9 Circuit 107 – Data set ready** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether the DCE is ready to operate. + +The ON condition, where circuit 142 is OFF or is not implemented, indicates that the signal converter or similar equipment is connected to the line and that the DCE is ready to exchange further control signals with the DTE to initiate transfer of data. + +The ON condition, in conjunction with the ON condition of circuit 142, indicates that the DCE is prepared to exchange data signals with the DTE for maintenance test purposes. + +The OFF condition, in conjunction with the ON condition on circuit 106, indicates that the DCE is ready to exchange data signals associated with the programming or control of serial automatic calling DCEs. + +The OFF condition, in conjunction with the OFF condition on circuit 106, indicates: + +- 1) that the DCE is not ready to operate in the data transfer phase; +- 2) that the DCE has detected a fault condition (which may be network or DCE dependent) which has lasted longer than some fixed period of time, such period of time being network dependent; or +- 3) in switched network operation, that the DCE has detected a disconnect indication from the remote station or from the network. + +The OFF condition, in conjunction with the ON condition on circuit 142, indicates that the DCE is involved in tests from the network or remote station. + +### **3.10 Circuit 108/1 – Connect data set to line** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit control switching of the signal-converter or similar equipment to or from the line. + +A transition from OFF to ON condition on this circuit causes the DCE to connect the signal-converter or similar equipment to the line. + +A transition from OFF to ON condition of this circuit may also be used to initiate a direct call facility for automatic calling DCEs. + +The ON condition on this circuit shall maintain the connection but shall not prevent the operation of disconnection functions optionally implemented in the DCE. Examples of such disconnection functions include, but are not limited to, the following: + +- loss of line signal (on switched telephone network); +- implementation of callback facility; +- depression of a push button at the DCE. + +The OFF condition on this circuit, except as noted below, causes the DCE to remove the signal-converter or similar equipment from the line, when the transmission of all data previously transferred on circuit 103 and/or circuit 118 has been completed. In the case where an intermediate function is implemented in the DCE, the DCE may delay the removal of the signal-converter from the line until the protocol requirements of the intermediate function have been satisfied (e.g. outstanding data has been acknowledged or a timeout has occurred). + +The OFF condition on this circuit may also be used to direct the DCE to abort or to clear a direct call facility operation (see Recommendation V.25 *bis*). + +## **3.11 Circuit 108/2 – Data terminal ready** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate the status of the DTE. + +The ON condition, indicating that the DTE is ready to operate, prepares the DCE to connect the signal-converter or similar equipment to the line. + +The DCE may be connected to the line by a supplementary condition. Examples of such supplementary conditions include, but are not restricted to, the following: + +- depression of a push button at the DCE; +- an incoming call in the case of automatic answering; +- a call request command from the DTE in the case of automatic calling. + +The DCE maintains the connection so long as the ON condition persists, except that the ON condition shall not prevent the operation of disconnection functions optionally implemented in the DCE. Examples of such disconnection functions are noted in the definition of circuit 108/1. + +The DTE is permitted to present the ON condition on circuit 108/2 whenever it is ready to transmit or receive data. + +The OFF condition on this circuit causes the DCE to remove the signal-converter or similar equipment from the line when the transmission to the line of all data previously transferred on circuit 103 and/or circuit 118 has been completed. In the case where an intermediate function is + +implemented in the DCE, the DCE may delay the removal of the signal converter from the line until the protocol requirements of the intermediate function have been satisfied (e.g. outstanding data has been acknowledged or a timeout has occurred). + +The OFF condition of this circuit may also be used to direct the DCE to abort or to clear a serial automatic calling operation (see Recommendation V.25 *bis*). + +## **3.12 Circuit 109 – Data channel received line signal detector** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether the received data channel line signal is within appropriate limits, as specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE. + +The ON condition indicates that the received line signal is within appropriate limits. + +Circuit 109 may also be in the ON condition during the exchange of data signals between the DCE and the DTE, associated with the programming or control of serial automatic calling DCEs. + +The OFF condition indicates that the received signal is not within appropriate limits. In the case where an intermediate function is implemented in the DCE, the DCE may delay the assertion of an OFF condition on circuit 109, in response to the conditions stated above, until all of the data in its buffers has been transferred to its associated DTE on circuit 104 or a timeout has occurred. + +## **3.13 Circuit 111 – Data signalling rate selector (DTE source)** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to select one of the two data signalling rates of a dual rate synchronous DCE, or to select one of the two ranges of data signalling rates of a dual range asynchronous DCE. + +The ON condition selects the higher rate or range of rates. + +The OFF condition selects the lower rate or range of rates. + +## **3.14 Circuit 112 – Data signalling rate selector (DCE source)** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to select one of the two data signalling rates or ranges of rates in the DTE to coincide with the data signalling rate or range of rates in use in a dual rate synchronous or dual range asynchronous DCE. + +The ON condition selects the higher rate or range of rates. + +The OFF condition selects the lower rate or range of rates. + +### **3.15 Circuit 113 – Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source)** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DCE with signal element timing information. + +The condition on this circuit shall be ON and OFF for nominally equal periods of time and the transition from ON to OFF condition shall nominally indicate the centre of each signal element on circuit 103. + +## **3.16 Circuit 114 – Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source)** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DTE with transmitter signal element timing information. + +The condition on this circuit shall be ON and OFF for nominally equal periods of time. The DTE shall present a data signal on circuit 103 in which the transitions between signal elements nominally occur at the time of the transitions from OFF to ON condition of circuit 114. + +Where variable transmitter signal element timing is required, the change to a different rate shall occur while this circuit is in the OFF condition. The new rate shall be an integer multiple or fraction of the old rate. + +Where it is required to temporarily halt data transmission, this circuit may be held in the OFF condition for a limited period of time. The maximum permissible duration of this condition is for further study. The duration of the OFF condition shall be an integer multiple of the length of a signal element before halting the signal. Signalling on this circuit may then be resumed at the same rate or at a different rate, as specified above. + +Where also character or 8-bit byte timing is provided using circuit 138 – *Transmitted character timing (DCE source)*, the change to a different rate on circuit 114 shall occur during the OFF condition that precedes the OFF-to-ON transition which indicates the first bit of a new character or 8-bit byte. + +## **3.17 Circuit 115 – Receiver signal element timing (DCE source)** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DTE with receiver signal element timing information. + +The condition of this circuit shall be ON and OFF for nominally equal periods of time, and a transition from ON to OFF condition shall nominally indicate the centre of each signal element on circuit 104. + +Where variable receiver signal element timing is required, the change to a different rate shall occur while this circuit is in the OFF condition. The new rate shall be an integer multiple or fraction of the old rate. + +Where it is required to temporarily halt data reception, this circuit may be held in the OFF condition for a limited period of time. The maximum permissible duration of this condition is for further study. The duration of the OFF condition shall be an integer multiple of the length of a signal element before halting the signal. Signalling on this circuit may then be resumed at the same rate or at a different rate, as specified above. + +Where also character or 8-bit byte timing is provided using circuit 131 – *Received character timing (DCE source)*, the change to a different rate on circuit 115 shall occur during the OFF condition that precedes the OFF-to-ON transition which indicates the first bit of a new character or 8-bit byte. + +### **3.18 Circuit 116/1 – Back-up switching in direct mode** + +Direction: To the DCE + +Signals on this circuit control switching of the DCE between normal and standby facilities. + +The ON condition causes the DCE to connect to the standby facility. + +The OFF condition causes the DCE to disconnect from the standby facility, when the transmission to line of all data previously transferred on circuit 103 has been completed, and the DCE then reconnects to the normal facility. + +## **3.19 Circuit 116/2 – Back-up switching in authorized mode** + +Direction: To the DCE + +Signals on this circuit control switching of the DCE between normal and standby facilities. + +The ON condition indicates that the DTE is ready to switch from the normal to the standby facility and prepares the DCE to switch to the standby facility when necessary. + +The OFF condition causes the DCE to disconnect from the standby facility, when the transmission to line of all data previously transferred on circuit 103 has been completed, and the DCE then reconnects to the normal facility. + +### **3.20 Circuit 117 – Standby indicator** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether the DCE is conditioned to operate in its standby mode with the predetermined facilities replaced by their reserves. + +The ON condition indicates that the DCE is conditioned to operate in its standby mode. + +The OFF condition indicates that the DCE is conditioned to operate in its normal mode. + +### **3.21 Circuit 118 – Transmitted backward channel data** + +Direction: To DCE + +This circuit is equivalent to circuit 103, except that it is used to transmit data via the backward channel. + +### **3.22 Circuit 119 – Received backward channel data** + +Direction: From DCE + +This circuit is equivalent to circuit 104, except that it is used for data received on the backward channel. + +## **3.23 Circuit 120 – Transmit backward channel line signal** + +Direction: To DCE + +This circuit is equivalent to circuit 105, except that it is used to control the backward channel transmit function of the DCE. + +The ON condition causes the DCE to assume the backward channel transmit mode. + +The OFF condition causes the DCE to assume the backward channel non-transmit mode, when all data transferred on circuit 118 have been transmitted to line. + +## **3.24 Circuit 121 – Backward channel ready** + +Direction: From DCE + +This circuit is equivalent to circuit 106, except that it is used to indicate whether the DCE is conditioned to transmit data on the backward channel. + +The ON condition indicates that the DCE is conditioned to transmit data on the backward channel. + +The OFF condition indicates that the DCE is not conditioned to transmit data on the backward channel. + +## **3.25 Circuit 122 – Backward channel received line signal detector** + +Direction: From DCE + +This circuit is equivalent to circuit 109, except that it is used to indicate whether the received backward channel line signal is within appropriate limits, as specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE. + +### **3.26 Circuit 125 – Calling indicator** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether a calling signal is being received by the DCE. + +The ON condition indicates that a calling signal is being received. + +The OFF condition indicates that no calling signal is being received, and this condition may also appear during interruptions of a pulse-modulated calling signal. + +### **3.27 Circuit 126 – Select transmit frequency** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to select the required transmit frequency of the DCE. + +The ON condition selects the higher transmit frequency. + +The OFF condition selects the lower transmit frequency. + +### **3.28 Circuit 128 – Receiver signal element timing (DTE source)** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DCE with signal element timing information. + +The condition on this circuit shall be ON and OFF for nominally equal periods of time. The DCE shall present a data signal on circuit 104 in which the transitions between signal elements nominally occur at the time of the transitions from OFF to ON condition of the signal on circuit 128. + +Where variable receiver signal element timing is required, the change to a different rate shall occur while this circuit is in the OFF condition. The new rate shall be an integer multiple or fraction of the old rate. + +Where it is required to temporarily halt data reception, this circuit may be held in the OFF condition for a limited period of time. The maximum permissible duration of this condition is for further study. The duration of the OFF condition shall be an integer multiple of the length of a signal element before halting the signal. Signalling on this circuit may then be resumed at the same rate or at a different rate, as specified above. + +### **3.29 Circuit 131 – Received character timing (DCE source)** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DTE with received character or 8-bit byte timing information, as specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE. + +Unless otherwise specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE, the condition of this circuit shall be OFF for nominally the period of the ON condition of circuit 115 – *Receiver signal element timing (DCE source)* which indicates the last bit of a character or an 8-bit byte, and shall be ON at all other times within the period of the character or 8-bit byte. + +The centre of the last bit of each character or 8-bit byte will be presented by the DCE on circuit 104 – *Received data* nominally at the time of the OFF to ON transition of circuit 131. + +The DCE shall transfer byte timing information on this circuit across the interface at all times that the timing source is capable of generating this information. + +Where variable receiver signal element timing is required, also the received character timing will have to be accordingly changed. The change to a different rate shall occur during the ON condition of circuit 131 (see definition of circuit 115). + +Where it is required to temporarily halt data reception, this circuit may be held in the ON condition for a limited period of time. The maximum permissible duration of this condition is for further study. + +### **3.30 Circuit 133 – Ready for receiving** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit control the transfer of data on circuit 104, indicating whether the DTE is capable of accepting a given amount of data (e.g. a block of data), specified in the appropriate Recommendation for an intermediate function, for example, error control. + +The ON condition shall be maintained whenever the DTE is capable of accepting data, and causes the intermediate equipment or DCE to transfer the received data to the DTE. + +The OFF condition indicates that the DTE is not able to accept data, and causes the intermediate equipment or DCE to retain the data. + +### **3.31 Circuit 134 – Received data present** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to separate information messages from supervisory messages, transferred on circuit 104, as specified in the appropriate Recommendation for intermediate equipment, e.g. error control equipment. + +The ON condition indicates the data which represents information messages. + +The OFF condition shall be maintained at all other times. + +### **3.32 Circuit 135 – Received energy present** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate the presence of energy on the line. + +The ON condition on this circuit indicates the instantaneous presence of energy on the line. + +The OFF condition on this circuit indicates the absence of energy on the line. + +NOTE – For certain applications, this circuit may be used to transfer an indication of the changing instantaneous levels of the received energy in an analogue manner. Details may be found in the appropriate DCE Recommendation. + +### **3.33 Circuit 137 – Transmitted character timing (DTE source)** + +Direction: From DTE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DCE with transmitted character or 8-bit byte timing information, as specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE. + +Unless otherwise specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE, the condition of this circuit shall be OFF for nominally the period of the ON condition of circuit 113 – *Transmitter signal element timing (DTE source)* which indicates the last bit of a character or an 8-bit byte, and shall be ON at all other times within the period of the character or 8-bit byte. + +The DTE shall present the centre of the last bit of each character or 8-bit byte on circuit 103 – *Transmitted data* nominally at the time of the OFF to ON transition of circuit 137 and the beginning of the first bit of each character or 8-bit byte nominally at the time of the OFF to ON transition of circuit 113 which follows the OFF to ON transition of circuit 137. + +The DTE shall transfer byte timing information on this circuit across the interface at all times that the timing source is capable of generating this information. + +## **3.34 Circuit 138 – Transmitted character timing (DCE source)** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit provide the DTE with transmitted character or 8-bit byte timing information, as specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE. + +Unless otherwise specified in the relevant Recommendation for DCE, the condition of this circuit shall be OFF for nominally the period of the ON condition of circuit 114 – *Transmitter signal element timing (DCE source)* which indicates the last bit of a character or an 8-bit byte, and shall be ON at all other times within the period of the character or 8-bit byte. + +The DTE will present the centre of the last bit of each character or 8-bit byte on circuit 103 – *Transmitted data* nominally at the time of the OFF to ON transition of circuit 138 and the beginning of the first bit of each character or 8-bit byte nominally at the time of the OFF to ON transition of circuit 114 which follows the OFF to ON transition of circuit 138. + +The DCE shall transfer byte timing information on this circuit across the interface at all times that the timing source is capable of generating this information. + +Where variable transmitter signal element timing is required, also the transmitted character timing will have to be accordingly changed. The change to a different rate shall occur during the ON condition of circuit 138 (see definition of circuit 114). + +Where it is required to temporarily halt data transmission, this circuit may be held in the ON condition for a limited period of time. The maximum permissible duration of this condition is for further study. + +## **3.35 Circuit 140 – Loopback/Maintenance test** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to initiate and release loopback or other maintenance test conditions in DCEs. + +The ON condition causes initiation of the maintenance test condition. + +The OFF condition causes release of the maintenance test condition. + +## **3.36 Circuit 141 – Local loopback** + +Direction: To DCE + +Signals on this circuit are used to control the loop 3 test condition in the local DCE. + +The ON condition of circuit 141 causes the establishment of the loop 3 test condition in the local DCE. + +The OFF condition of circuit 141 causes the release of the loop 3 test condition in the local DCE. + +## **3.37 Circuit 142 – Test indicator** + +Direction: From DCE + +Signals on this circuit indicate whether a maintenance condition exists. + +The ON condition indicates that a maintenance condition exists in the DCE, precluding reception or transmission of data signals from or to a remote DTE. + +The OFF condition indicates that the DCE is not in a maintenance test condition. + +# **4 Operational requirements** + +In the following, operational requirements are given for the usage of interchange circuits. It also explains in further detail the required correlation between interchange circuits, where implemented. + +## **4.1 Data circuits and timing circuits** + +### **4.1.1 Data circuits** + +It is evident that proper data transmission may be impaired when the required condition is not present on an implemented control interchange circuit. Therefore, the DTE shall not transfer, on circuit 103, data which is for transmission to line or for maintenance purposes unless an ON condition is present on all of the following four circuits, where implemented: circuit 105, circuit 106, circuit 107 and circuit 108/1 or 108/2. + +The DTE may transfer, on circuit 103, data which is for the programming or control of serial automatic calling DCEs when an ON condition is present on circuits 106 and 108/2, and an OFF condition is present on circuit 107. In this situation, the condition of circuit 105 need not be considered, and may be ON for DTE convenience. + +All data transferred on circuit 103 during the time an ON condition is present on all of the above four circuits, where implemented, shall be transmitted by the DCE. + +Refer also to 4.2.1 and 4.3.1 below for further explanation. + +The DTE shall not transfer data on circuit 118 unless an ON condition is present on all of the following four circuits, where implemented: circuit 120, circuit 121, circuit 107 and circuit 108/1 or 108/2. + +All data transferred on circuit 118 during the time an ON condition is present on all of the above four circuits, where implemented, shall be transmitted by the DCE. + +### **4.1.2 Timing circuits** + +It is desirable that the transfer of timing information across the interface shall not be restricted to periods when actual transmission of data is in progress; however, during intervals when timing information is not transferred across the interface, the circuit involved should be held in the OFF condition. + +Accuracy and stability of the signal on circuit 115 as defined in the DCE Recommendations are required only when circuit 109 is ON. Drift during the OFF condition of circuit 109 is acceptable; however, resynchronization of the signal on circuit 115 shall be accomplished as rapidly as possible following the turning ON of circuit 109 for the next transmission as indicated in the relevant DCE Recommendation. + +## **4.2 Control and indication circuits** + +### **4.2.1 Operation of circuits 107, 108/1 and 108/2** + +#### **4.2.1.1 In switched and leased line operations** + +Signals on circuit 107 are to be considered as responses to signals which initiate connection to line, e.g. circuit 108/1. However, the conditioning of a data channel, such as equalization and clamp removal, cannot be expected to have been completed when circuit 107 is turned ON. + +A configuration option shall be provided within the DCE to select either circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2 operation. + +Under certain test conditions, both the DTE and the DCE may exercise some of the interchange circuits. Thus, when circuits 107, 108/1 or 108/2 are both OFF, the DTE is to ignore the conditions on all other interchange circuits from the DCE, except those on circuit 125 and the timing circuits, and the DCE is to ignore the conditions on all other interchange circuits from the DTE. + +During the maintenance phases specified in Recommendation V.54, when the DTE is not involved in the test, circuit 142 is in the ON condition and circuit 107 is in the OFF condition. Circuit 107 shall not respond to circuits 108/1 or 108/2. When the DTE is involved in the test, circuit 142 is in the ON condition and circuit 107 shall respond to circuit 108/1 or 108/2. + +#### **4.2.1.2 In leased line operations** + +Where circuit 108 is not implemented in the DTE, the condition on this circuit is assumed to be permanently ON. + +Where circuit 108 is implemented in the DTE, it shall be implemented as circuit 108/1. + +#### **4.2.1.3 In switched line operations** + +When the DCE is conditioned for automatic answering of calls, answering of incoming calls occurs only in response to a combination of the calling signal and an ON condition of circuit 108/1 or 108/2. + +The OFF condition of circuit 108/1 or 108/2 shall not disable the operation of circuit 125. + +When circuit 108/2 is in the ON condition and circuit 107 is in the OFF condition, the DTE may communicate with serial automatic calling DCEs on circuits 103 and 104. This state is recognized by an ON condition on circuit 106. + +When circuit 108/1 or 108/2 is turned OFF, it shall not be turned ON again until circuit 107 is turned OFF. + +In the case where the DCE turns circuit 107 OFF first, the DTE shall consider the call aborted and shall proceed as described below: + +- 1) In the case of circuit 108/1, the DTE shall turn this circuit OFF with minimal delay and shall hold the circuit in the OFF condition for a minimum of 500 ms. After that period of time, the DTE may turn circuit 108/1 back ON either to initiate a new direct call or to respond to an incoming call signalled by circuit 125 coming ON. + +The DCE shall not answer an incoming call or initiate a new call until circuit 108/1 has first been turned OFF and then back ON again. + +- 2) In the case of circuit 108/2, the DTE shall turn this circuit OFF with minimal delay and shall hold the circuit in the OFF condition for a minimum of 500 ms. After that period of time, the DTE may turn circuit 108/2 back ON either to initiate a new serial automatic calling procedure or to signal the DCE that it is prepared to accept an incoming call. + +The DCE shall answer an incoming call or initiate a new call until circuit 108/2 has been turned OFF and then back ON again or after a minimum delay (provisional value 2 s). + +#### **4.2.2 Circuit 125 – Calling indicator** + +The operation of circuit 125 shall not be impaired or disabled by any condition on any other interchange circuit. + +#### **4.2.3 Usage of circuit 126** + +Originally, this circuit was defined for operational control of a 2-wire, frequency-divided duplex DCE, such as the Recommendation V.21-type modem. Transmitter and receiver control were separated, so that local testing of both data channels might be performed as national Administrations required. + +The modem according to Recommendation V.21 selects the transmit and receive frequencies according to the condition of circuit 125 in switched network operation. + +However, the use of circuit 126 may become necessary in certain types of non-centralized multipoint operation, as specified in the relevant DCE Recommendation. + +### **4.2.4 Circuit 140 – Loopback/Maintenance Test** + +#### **4.2.4.1 Usage of circuit 140** + +Circuit 140 can be used in conjunction with coded commands on circuit 103 in accordance with the provisions of Recommendation V.54. + +In systems not including the use of circuit 103, i.e. no coded commands, circuit 140 controls only the remote loopback (loop 2). + +In systems that involve the use of circuit 103, additional maintenance applications of circuit 140 are possible. These additional applications remain for further study. + +#### **4.2.4.2 Interrelationship of circuits 105, 106 and 140** + +For automatic control of loop 2 test, circuit 106 is under the control of circuit 140 and circuit 105 is disregarded by the DCE. + +## **4.3 Miscellaneous** + +### **4.3.1 Interrelationship of circuits 103, 105 and 106** + +The DTE signals its intent to transmit data by turning ON circuit 105. It is then the responsibility of the DCE to enter the transmit mode, i.e. be prepared to transmit data, and also to alert the remote DCE and condition it to receive data. The means by which a DCE enters the transmit mode and alerts and conditions the remote DCE are described in the appropriate DCE Recommendation. + +When the transmitting DCE turns circuit 106 ON with circuit 107 in the ON condition, the DTE is permitted to transfer data across the interface on circuit 103. By turning ON circuit 106 with circuit 107 ON, it is implied that all data transferred across the interface prior to the time that any one of the four circuits (105, 106, 107 and 108/1 or 108/2) is again turned OFF, will be transferred to the line; however, the ON condition of circuit 106 is not necessarily a guarantee that the remote DCE is in the receive mode. (Depending on the complexity and sophistication of the transmitting signal converter, there may be a delay ranging from less than a millisecond up to several seconds between the time a bit is transferred across the interface until the time a signal element representing this bit is transmitted on the line.) + +When the transmitting DCE turns circuit 106 ON, with circuit 107 in the OFF condition, the DTE is permitted to transfer programming or control signals to a serial automatic calling DCE across the interface on circuit 103. + +During data transfer, the DTE shall not turn circuit 105 OFF before the end of the last bit (data bit or stop element) is transferred across the interface on circuit 103. Similarly, in certain duplex switched network applications where circuit 105 is not implemented (see the specific DCE Recommendations), this requirement applies equally when circuit 108/1 or 108/2 is turned OFF to terminate a switched network call. + +Where circuit 105 is provided, the ON and OFF conditions on circuit 106 during the data transfer phase (i.e. circuit 107 ON) shall be responses to the ON and OFF conditions on circuit 105. Circuit 106 may, however, be turned OFF during the data transfer and test phases independent of the condition of circuit 105 to signal the DTE to interrupt the transfer of data on circuit 103 *transmitted data*, for a finite period of time (e.g. for DCE flow control purposes or DCE/DCE resynchronization). It should be noted that data presented on circuit 103 after circuit 106 turns OFF may be disregarded by the DCE. It should also be noted that circuit 106 may be turned back ON again at any time, provided that circuit 105 is ON at that time. For the appropriate response times of circuit 106, and for the operation of circuit 106 when circuit 105 is not provided, refer to the relevant Recommendation for the DCE. + +For serial automatic calling DCEs, the ON and OFF conditions on circuit 106 outside the data transfer phase (i.e. circuit 107 OFF) shall be dependent on the interface state during the automatic call set-up and associated procedures. The transitions on circuit 106 for this application shall be as detailed in Recommendation V.25 *bis*. + +When circuit 105 and circuit 106 are both OFF, the DTE shall maintain a binary 1 condition on circuit 103. When circuit 105 is turned OFF it shall not be turned ON again until circuit 106 is turned OFF by the DCE. + +NOTE – These conditions also apply to the relationship between circuits 120, 121 and 118. + +### **4.3.2 Idle periods** + +During intervals when circuit 105 and circuit 106 are in the ON condition and no data are available for transmission, the DTE may transmit binary 1 condition, reversals or other sequences to maintain timing synchronizing, e.g. SYN coded characters, idle characters according to the data link control procedure used, etc. + +Specific requirements, where applicable, are stated in the appropriate DCE Recommendations. + +### **4.3.3 Clamping** + +**4.3.3.1** In all applications the DCE shall hold, where implemented: + +- a) circuit 104 in the binary 1 condition when circuit 109 is in the OFF condition; and +- b) circuit 119 in the binary 1 condition when circuit 122 is in the OFF condition. + +**4.3.3.2** In addition, a DCE constrained to half-duplex operation on a 2-wire line shall also hold, where implemented: + +- a) circuit 104 in the binary 1 condition and circuit 109 in the OFF condition when circuit 105 is in the ON condition, and for a short time interval (to be specified in Recommendations for DCE) following the ON to OFF transition on circuit 105; and +- b) circuit 119 in the binary 1 condition and circuit 122 in the OFF condition, when circuit 120 is in the ON condition, and for a short time interval (to be specified in Recommendations for DCE) following the ON to OFF transition on circuit 120. + +## **4.4 Circuit failures (electrical)** + +A failure condition on one of the following interchange circuits, where implemented, shall be used to detect either a power-off condition in the equipment connected through the interface or the disconnection of the interconnecting cable: + +- Circuit 105 – Request to send +- Circuit 107 – Data set ready +- Circuit 108/1 – Connect data set to line +- Circuit 108/2 – Data terminal ready +- Circuit 120 – Transmit backward channel line signal + +The criteria used to determine a failure condition shall be specified in the appropriate Recommendation for electrical characteristics. + +The receivers for these circuits shall interpret the power-off condition or the disconnection of the interconnecting cable as an OFF condition on these circuits. + +## **4.5 Provision of interchange circuits in DCEs and DTEs** + +In some DCE Recommendations optional facilities are defined which require control from the DTE via dedicated circuits. Where the DTE does not provide the respective circuits, these optional facilities cannot be used. The DCE should provide means to disable an option, when necessary, in case the DTE is not equipped with circuitry to control this option. On the other hand, in case the DCE does not provide an option, proper operation of the DTE should not rely on any specific response from the DCE when the DTE activates the control circuit related to that option. + +Receiver circuits may be provided in a DTE or a DCE for which no generator is provided in the complementary equipment. Therefore, in cases where a receiver is not connected to a generator, it is suggested that means be provided in the equipment where the receiver is located to inhibit or disregard any possible false triggering of this receiver. + +## **4.6 Data flow control** + +Some DTE and DCE functionalities rely on the presence of a data flow control mechanism between the DTE and the DCE. Methods for data flow control are described in detail in [9]. + +## **4.7 Power-up considerations** + +During a power-up condition of a DTE or a DCE, the behaviour at the interface towards the complementary equipment is unpredictable. For a short period of time conditions may be assumed that are illegal under normal operational conditions. DTEs and DCEs should therefore be tolerant to illegal conditions and return to normal operation when the illegal condition terminates. + +# **5 References** + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- [1] ITU-T Recommendation V.10 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates nominally up to 100 kbit/s.* + +- [2] ITU-T Recommendation V.11 (1996), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits operating at data signalling rates up to 10 Mbit/s.* +- [3] ITU-T Recommendation V.12 (1995), *Electrical characteristics for balanced double-current interchange circuits for interfaces with data signalling rates up to 52 Mbit/s.* +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation V.25 (1996), *Automatic answering equipment and general procedures for automatic calling equipment on the general switched telephone network including procedures for disabling of echo control devices for both manually and automatically established calls.* +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation V.25 bis (1996), *Synchronous and asynchronous automatic dialling procedures on switched networks.* +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation V.28 (1993), *Electrical characteristics for unbalanced double-current interchange circuits.* +- [7] CCITT Recommendation V.31 (1972), *Electrical characteristics for single-current interchange circuits controlled by contact closure.* +- [8] CCITT Recommendation V.31 bis (1984), *Electrical characteristics for single-current interchange circuits using optocouplers.* +- [9] ITU-T Recommendation V.43 (1998), *Data flow control.* +- [10] ISO 2110:1989, *Information technology – Data communication – 25-pole DTE/DCE interface connector and contact number assignments.* +- [11] ISO 4902:1989, *Information technology – Data communication – 37-pole DTE/DCE interface connector and contact number assignments.* +- [12] ISO/IEC 11569:1993, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – 26-pole interface connector mateability dimensions and contact number assignments.* +- [13] ISO/IEC 13575:1995, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – 50-pole interface connector mateability dimensions and contact number assignments.* + + + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.25-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.25-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b231454a671aec9b5d5562cbcb3069afad30d92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.25-199610-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,417 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.25 + +(10/96) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Interfaces and voiceband modems + +--- + +**Automatic answering equipment and general procedures for automatic calling equipment on the general switched telephone network including procedures for disabling of echo control devices for both manually and automatically established calls** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.25 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +- | | +|--------------------------------------------| +| 1 – General | +| 2 – Interfaces and voiceband modems | +| 3 – Wideband modems | +| 4 – Error control | +| 5 – Transmission quality and maintenance | +| 6 – Interworking with other networks | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# FOREWORD + +The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). + +ITU-T Recommendation V.25, was revised by ITU-T Study Group 14 (1993-1996) and was approved by the WTSC (Geneva, October 9-18, 1996). + +## --- NOTES + +1. In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. +2. The status of annexes and appendices attached to the Series V Recommendations should be interpreted as follows: + - an *annex* to a Recommendation forms an integral part of the Recommendation; + - an *appendix* to a Recommendation does not form part of the Recommendation and only provides some complementary explanation or information specific to that Recommendation. + +© ITU 1997 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 Abbreviations and definitions ..... | 2 | +| 3 Interface procedures at call-originating data station ..... | 3 | +| 4 Interface procedure at answering data station ..... | 6 | +| 5 Proposed line procedures ..... | 6 | +| 6 Manually controlled modem calling automatically controlled modem ..... | 7 | +| 7 Automatically controlled calling modem calling manually controlled modem ..... | 7 | +| 8 Disabling of echo suppressors in the case of manually operated data stations ..... | 8 | +| 9 Notification to ordinary telephone users ..... | 8 | +| 10 Manual selection of automatic answering, data mode and voice mode ..... | 8 | +| 11 2100 Hz tone recognition ..... | 8 | +| References ..... | 9 | + +# **AUTOMATIC ANSWERING EQUIPMENT AND GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR AUTOMATIC CALLING EQUIPMENT ON THE GENERAL SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK INCLUDING PROCEDURES FOR DISABLING OF ECHO CONTROL DEVICES FOR BOTH MANUALLY AND AUTOMATICALLY ESTABLISHED CALLS** + +*(Mar del Plata, 1968; amended at Geneva, 1972 and 1976; +revised at Malaga-Torremolinos in 1984 and at Geneva in 1996)* + +## **1 Scope** + +**1.1** This Recommendation is concerned with the setting-up of a data connection when Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE) comprising automatic answering equipment is used over international circuits. Automatic calling procedures are defined in Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*. + +NOTE – Up to and including the 1988 (*Blue Book*) version, this Recommendation, in addition to what is outlined herein, specified parallel automatic calling equipment using the 200-Series interchange circuits defined in Recommendation V.24, and an associated automatic call set-up protocol. It is the opinion of the ITU-T that both this type of equipment and the associated protocol are out of date, and that more modern techniques and protocols are specified in Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*. It is therefore not recommended to use this technique for new designs. + +Automatic answering equipment used within any single Member's area or between two Members by bilateral agreement is not necessarily constrained by the procedures specified herein. In particular, the use of the 2100 Hz answering tone, as described in this Recommendation, could be substituted by another tone when the equipment is used over circuits not equipped with echo control devices. Similarly, the calling tone could be omitted by bilateral agreements, but attention is drawn to clauses 7 and 8 below. + +In addition, the provisions for echo canceller disabling and for a "calling station response" prior to the termination of the answer tone are optional and only applicable to Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE) for which the relevant V-Series Recommendation specifically calls for such provision(s). + +**1.2** This Recommendation describes the sequence of events involved in establishing a connection between an automatic calling data station1) and an automatic answering data station for V-Series Recommendations modems specified for general switched telephone network operations. + +Consideration is given only to: + +- a) the events which affect the interfaces between the data terminal equipment and the data circuit-terminating equipment at the answering data station; and +- b) the events on the line during establishment of a data call. + +Interactions within the data circuit-terminating equipment are not considered, since such consideration is unnecessary for purposes of international standardization. + +**1.3** The proposed procedures are intended to be suitable for four types of calls, namely: + +- a) automatic calling data station to automatic answering data station; +- b) manual calling data station to automatic answering data station; +- c) automatic calling data station to manual answering data station; +- d) disabling of echo suppressors in the case of manual calling data stations. + +--- + +1) In this Recommendation, the term "data station" is synonymous with the term "terminal installation for data transmission" [1]. + +- 1.4** The data terminal equipment is responsible for: +- a) during call establishment: + - i) ensuring that the data circuit-terminating equipment is available for operation; + - ii) providing the telephone number; + - iii) deciding to abandon the call if it is unsuccessfully completed; + - b) after call is established: + - i) establishing identities; + - ii) exchanging such traffic as is appropriate; + - iii) initiating disconnect at calling and answering station. + +## **2 Abbreviations and definitions** + +The following abbreviations are used in this Recommendation: + +DCE Data Circuit-terminating Equipment +DTE Data Terminal Equipment + +The following definitions apply to this Recommendation: + +**2.1 calling tone:** The tone transmitted from the calling end. The calling tone consists of a series of interrupted 1300 Hz $\pm$ 15 Hz signals (bursts). ON for a duration of not less than 0.5 s and not more than 0.7 s and OFF for a duration of not less than 1.5 s and not more than 2.0 s.2) 3) + +**2.2 answering tone:** The tone transmitted from the called end. + +NOTES + +1 – The answering tone is an uninterrupted 2100 $\pm$ 15 Hz tone with a duration, except when truncated as described in 4.3, of 3.3 $\pm$ 0.7 s. + +2 – Recommendation V.8 specifies, for the purpose of starting sessions of data transmission, an amplitude modulated answering tone, ANSam. + +**2.3 phase reversals:** Reversals ( $180^\circ$ ) in the phase of the answering tone at intervals of 425 to 475 ms. The reversal in phase shall be accomplished such that the phase is within $180 \pm 10$ degrees in 1 ms, and that the amplitude of the answering tone is not more than 3 dB below its steady state value for more than 400 $\mu s$ . + +**2.4 starting signal:** Binary 1, synchronizing signal or equalizer training signal, as specified in the relevant V-Series Recommendation.4) + +**2.5 calling station response:** A tone or signal transmitted from the calling DCE in response to its detection, as defined in this Recommendation, of answering tone.4), 5), 6) + +**2.6 automatic calling:** A procedure by which a DTE, by use of V.24 interchange circuits, may instruct a DCE to perform the call establishment function. The transmission, from DTE to DCE, of each digit to be dialled is achieved on interchange circuit 103 (see Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*). + +--- + +2) The calling tone and calling station response should not contain power in the band 2100 $\pm$ 250 Hz. + +3) The power levels of the signals specified in this Recommendation shall conform to the levels specified in Recommendation V.2. + +4) The calling tone and calling station response should not contain power in the band 2100 $\pm$ 250 Hz. + +5) The power levels of the signals specified in this Recommendation shall conform to the levels specified in Recommendation V.2. + +6) The specification of the calling station response and the timing of its transmission are the subject of the individual V-Series Recommendation for the DCE involved. The specifications in this Recommendation cover only limitations on its transmission during call establishment. + +## 3 Interface procedures at call-originating data station + +The description of the complete interface procedures for call initiation at a call-originating data station is not part of this Recommendation. Details may be found in Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*. + +### Event + +**3.1** The DTE instructs the DCE to establish a call, and specifies the number to be dialled. Subsequently, circuit 108/2 is in the ON condition (circuit 108/2 may be turned in the ON condition at any time up to and including event 3.6). + +**3.2** For half-duplex modems, DTE puts circuit 105 ON if the calling end wishes to transmit first. Circuit 105 can be placed ON at any time up to and including event 3.10. + +**3.3** The DCE goes “off-hook”. + +**3.4** The telephone system puts dial tone on line.7) + +**3.5** The DCE dials the wanted telephone number. + +**3.6** The DTE turns circuit 108/2 ON, if not previously ON. + +**3.7** If implemented, the DCE transmits the interrupted calling tone to line, as shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3. + +![Timing diagram for line signals showing calling and answering tones with various time intervals and annotations.](e2c1c672349c10dccb2563eff6d8260e_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the timing of line signals during a call initiation sequence. It features two main horizontal timelines. The top timeline shows a 'Calling tone' (represented by a rectangle) with a duration of 0.5-0.7 s, followed by a 1.5-2 s interval, and then another 'Calling tone' (rectangle) with a duration of 0.5-0.7 s. The bottom timeline shows an 'Answering tone 2100 Hz' (represented by a long rectangle) with a total duration of $3.3 \pm 0.7$ s. This answering tone is divided into segments: 0.4 s, 0.9 s, 0.1-0.6 s, and a 'Tolerance' of $75 \pm 20$ ms. A box labeled 'DCE under control of the DTE, CT 107 ON' is connected to the end of the answering tone. Below the timelines, four boxes provide context for the time intervals: 'Not sufficient to disable echo suppressors' (pointing to the first 0.4 s segment), 'Network interaction time' (pointing to the 0.9 s segment), '2100 Hz detection time' (pointing to the 0.1-0.6 s segment), and 'Gap for recognizing the end of the 2100 Hz answering tone' (pointing to the tolerance segment). A reference code 'T1403050-97/d01' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Timing diagram for line signals showing calling and answering tones with various time intervals and annotations. + +FIGURE 1/V.25 +Timing of line signals + +7) Some countries apply the second dial tone to the line after the initial digit is transferred. + +![Timing diagram for optional calling station response. The diagram shows the sequence of events between a calling data station and an answering data station. At the top, a 'Calling tone burst truncated' is shown with a duration of ≥ 400 ms. Below this, the 'Calling station response' is shown. A vertical line indicates 'ANS detected for ≥ 100 ms'. The 'ANS' (answer tone) is shown as a horizontal bar with a duration of ≤ 4.0 s. The 'ANS' is preceded by a 'Silent interval' of 1.8-2.5 s. The 'ANS' is followed by an 'Answer modem line signal' with a duration of 75 ± 20 ms. The diagram also shows the 'Calling station response detected for ≥ 100 ms' and the 'ANS' detected for ≥ 100 ms. The diagram is labeled 'Timing at calling data station' and 'Timing at answering data station'. A vertical line on the right indicates 'DCE under control of the DTE, CT 107 ON'. The diagram is labeled 'T1403060-97/d02'.](3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg) + +Calling tone burst truncateda) + +≥ 400 ms + +Timing at calling data station + +Calling tone burst + +Calling station response + +ANS detected for ≥ 100 ms + +DCE under control of the DTE, CT 107 ONb) + +ANSc) + +Calling station response detected for ≥ 100 ms + +Answering +data station +connected +to line + +Timing at answering data station + +1.8-2.5 s Silent interval + +≤ 4.0 sd) + +75 ± 20 ms + +T1403060-97/d02 + +Timing diagram for optional calling station response. The diagram shows the sequence of events between a calling data station and an answering data station. At the top, a 'Calling tone burst truncated' is shown with a duration of ≥ 400 ms. Below this, the 'Calling station response' is shown. A vertical line indicates 'ANS detected for ≥ 100 ms'. The 'ANS' (answer tone) is shown as a horizontal bar with a duration of ≤ 4.0 s. The 'ANS' is preceded by a 'Silent interval' of 1.8-2.5 s. The 'ANS' is followed by an 'Answer modem line signal' with a duration of 75 ± 20 ms. The diagram also shows the 'Calling station response detected for ≥ 100 ms' and the 'ANS' detected for ≥ 100 ms. The diagram is labeled 'Timing at calling data station' and 'Timing at answering data station'. A vertical line on the right indicates 'DCE under control of the DTE, CT 107 ON'. The diagram is labeled 'T1403060-97/d02'. + +- a) If ANS is detected during a calling tone burst, the burst may be truncated. If it is not truncated, the calling station response must be delayed until at least 400 ms after the end of the burst. +- b) See 3.10 for exception. +- c) ANS denotes the answer tone. +- d) If a calling station response is not received, the answer tone shall continue for $3.3 \pm 0.7$ seconds. + +FIGURE 2/V.25 + +### Timing of line signals – Optional calling station response + +- 3.8** a) If the call is answered by a data station, then the answering tone is received by the calling DCE. Echo suppressors and echo cancellers are disabled during coincidence of a silent period in the interrupted calling tone (event 3.7) with the answering tone. The answering tone shall not activate circuits 104 and 109. +- b) The subsequent action of the DCE and the DTE if no answering tone is detected is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. Details may be found in Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*. + +**3.9** When an answering tone has been received by the DCE for a period of 100 to 600 ms, the interrupted calling tone is discontinued by the DCE as shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3. The DCE transfers control of the connection to circuit 108/2. + +![Timing diagram of line signals for echo canceller disabling and calling station response.](352c5fab6f936356e9570761a02ab71e_img.jpg) + +FIGURE 3/V.25 +**Timing of line signals, optional provision for echo canceller disabling +and for calling station response** + +The diagram shows two horizontal timelines: 'Timing at calling data station' and 'Timing at answering data station'. + +- Calling station:** Shows a 'Calling tone burst' which can be truncated. After a delay of ≥ 1 s from the end of the burst, the 'Calling station response' begins. This response is under control of the DTE, with CT 107 ON. +- Answering station:** Starts with a 'Silent interval' of 1.8-2.5 s. This is followed by ANS (answer tone) for a duration τ, then ANS (phase reversed answer tone) for duration τ, where τ = 450 ± 25 ms. A second ANS segment follows. The total duration of these tones is ≤ 4.0 s. +- Interactions:** ANS is detected by the calling station for ≥ 100 ms. The calling station response is detected by the answering station for ≥ 100 ms. After the calling station response is detected, the answering station waits for a period ≤ τ before switching to 'Answer modem line signal' after a final delay of 75 ± 20 ms. + +a) If ANS is detected during a calling tone burst, the burst may be truncated. If it is not truncated, the calling station response must be delayed until at least 1 second after the end of the burst. +b) See 3.10 for exception. +c) ANS denotes the answer tone. ANS denotes the answer tone with its phase reversed. +d) The answer tone duration must be at least 2.6 seconds if a calling station response is not received. + +Timing diagram of line signals for echo canceller disabling and calling station response. + +The DCE may, as shown in Figures 2 and 3, transmit the calling station response following the detection of a continuation of the answering tone for a period of at least 400 ms after the transmission of the calling tone is terminated. As indicated in Figure 3, the required duration (≥ 1 s) of the continuous 2100 Hz period, which must follow the termination of the calling tone, is longer if the answering tone includes phase reversals to disable echo cancellers. + +**3.10** The DCE examines the line to determine the end of the answering tone. The DCE detects an absence of the answering tone for 75 ± 20 ms, and then turns circuit 107 ON:8) + +- i) If circuit 105 is ON, the starting signal is put on the line. After its delay as specified in the appropriate V-Series Recommendation, circuit 106 comes ON, and the DTE can then transmit data. +- ii) If circuit 105 is OFF, the incoming starting signal is recognized, and after its delay as specified in the appropriate V-Series Recommendation, the DCE turns circuit 109 ON to allow the examination of circuit 104 by the DTE. +- iii) For the duplex modem case, where circuit 105 is not used, the starting signal is put on the line after circuit 107 has been turned ON. The DCE then turns circuits 109 and 106 ON after a delay as specified in the appropriate V-Series Recommendation. + +--- + +8) For some DCEs requiring extended training sequences, the associated V-Series Recommendation may specify that circuit 107 be turned ON at some later time, during the handshake sequence, which is more consistent with the specification in Recommendation V.24 of circuit 107. + +**Recommendation V.25 (10/96)** 5 + +**3.11** The signalling between DTE and DCE to disconnect the call is outside the scope of this Recommendation. Details may be found in Recommendations V.25 *bis* and V.25 *ter*. + +NOTE – Where circuit 105 or circuit 120 is not implemented, the timing of circuit 106 or circuit 121 shall be related to circuit 107 and circuit 109 respectively. + +## **4 Interface procedure at answering data station** + +### **Event** + +**4.1** Ringing received on line. The DCE puts circuit 125 ON. + +**4.2** a) If circuit 108/2 is ON, the DCE goes “off-hook”. +b) If circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2 is OFF, the DCE waits for circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2 to come ON, and then goes “off-hook”. If circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2 is not turned ON by the DTE, then the call is not answered. + +**4.3** The DCE goes “off-hook”, maintains silence on the line for a period between 1.8 and 2.5 s, then transmits the answering tone for a certain period of time, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. + +Where it is intended to disable network echo cancellers [3] as well as echo suppressors [2], phase reversals shall be introduced, as indicated in Figure 3. + +The answering tone, with continued reversals in its phase, shall continue for $3.3 \pm 0.7$ s unless a calling station response is received, in which case the answering tone may be discontinued after detection of the response for 100 ms. + +For the very special application in which an automatically answering modem is permanently dedicated to receive calls only from acoustically coupled originating stations, the modem may, optionally, extend the duration of the answering tone to ten seconds to compensate for operator reaction time in placing the handset on the acoustic coupler. All other timeouts remain the same, and the protocol is as defined in clause 6. Use of the extended answering tone is restricted expressly to this unique application. + +**4.4** At the end of the transmission of the answering tone, the DCE shall provide a silent period for $75 \pm 20$ ms. The DCE puts circuit 107 ON after this silent period.9) + +## **5 Proposed line procedures** + +The line procedures outlined are applicable to both duplex and half-duplex modems. + +Systems which operate in the half-duplex mode and which employ automatic calling equipment shall determine by pre-arrangement which of the two data stations – calling or answering – shall first transmit to the other upon establishment of the data connection. As indicated in clause 3 above, the DTE at the data station which is to transmit first shall put circuit 105 ON, at the appropriate point in the call establishment sequence. For correct operation, it is necessary that the longer response times of circuits 106 and 109 as specified in the appropriate V-Series Recommendation are used during call establishment. + +Figures 1, 2 and 3 show the timing of line signals when automatic calling and automatic answering are employed. The sequence of operation is as follows: + +On completion of dialling as specified in the appropriate V-Series Recommendation or, where possible, the other end going off-hook, the DCE sends the calling tone to the answering data station. + +--- + +9) For some DCEs requiring extended training sequences, the associated V-Series Recommendation may specify that circuit 107 be turned ON at some later time, during the handshake sequence, which is more consistent with the specification in Recommendation V.24 of circuit 107. + +1.8 to 2.5 s after the answering modem is connected to the line (i.e. circuits 125 and 108 are ON), it sends a continuous answering tone for a duration of not more than 4.0 s. If it is intended to disable network echo cancellers as well as echo suppressors, the answering modem shall transmit phase reversals (see Figure 3). + +The answering tone propagates towards the calling data station and, during the course of one or two interruptions between bursts of calling tone, causes any echo suppressors in the circuit to disable. If the phase reversals are included in the signal, any echo cancellers in the circuit are also disabled. + +The answering tone is recognized by the calling modem 100 ms to 600 ms after its arrival. The calling modem discontinues the calling tone and may transmit a calling station response. + +The answering modem, after detecting the calling station response, shall discontinue transmission of the answering tone and shall provide a silent interval of $75 \pm 20$ ms in its transmitted output following the discontinuance of the answering tone and shall then turn circuit 107 ON.10) + +The calling modem recognizes the end of the answering tone for a period of $75 \pm 20$ ms. At the end of this interval, the calling modem shall turn circuit 107 ON. + +To keep the echo suppressor disabled, it is necessary to ensure that following the $75 \pm 20$ ms silent period after the transmission of the answering tone from the answering modem, which serves to disable the echo suppressor or echo canceller during the silent period in the calling tone, energy is maintained as specified in Recommendation G.164 [2]. + +During the automatic calling and answering procedures, the echo suppressors will be disabled, and the echo cancellers will be disabled if the required sequence is transmitted. If signal gaps, at the echo suppressor or canceller, exceed 100 ms at any time, e.g. during modem turn-around, they may become re-enabled. This requires that, to maintain the disabled state of echo control devices on circuits with satellite links, the answering modem resumes transmission after the $75 \pm 20$ ms silent period unless a calling station response is received prior to the silent interval and appropriately continued. + +## **6 Manually controlled modem calling automatically controlled modem** + +The procedure for establishing a call from a manually controlled modem to a modem comprising automatic answering equipment is similar to that from an automatically calling modem, except that no tone is transmitted from the calling modem until the answering modem has answered. The operator dials the required number, hears 2100 Hz returned from the answering modem and then, during the period that 2100 Hz is being received, depresses his data button to connect the modem to line. Circuit 107 comes ON at the time specified in event 3.10. + +Where the calling modem is acoustically coupled to the line, placement of the telephone handset on the acoustic coupler is logically equivalent to pressing a “data” button on a permanently installed modem. + +Satisfactory disabling of echo suppressors and echo cancellers by the answering tone, however, will require that no speech signals from the microphone at the calling data station enter the telecommunication circuit for a period of at least 1 s during the receipt of the answering tone. This may be accomplished by a handset switch or other appropriate means. + +## **7 Automatically controlled calling modem calling manually controlled modem** + +An operator answering a call from a modem comprising automatic calling equipment hears the interrupted calling tone of 0.5 to 0.7 s ON and 1.5 to 2.0 s OFF. The data button must be depressed to connect the modem to line. A period of up to 4.0 s of the answering tone is transmitted to the calling modem to disable echo suppressors and/or echo cancellers and to notify the calling modem that the connection is being established. This sequence is followed by data transmission, as required. + +--- + +10) For some DCEs requiring extended training sequences, the associated V-Series Recommendation may specify that circuit 107 be put ON at some later time, during the handshake sequence, which is more consistent with the specification in Recommendation V.24 of circuit 107. + +## **8        Disabling of echo suppressors in the case of manually operated data stations** + +The procedures as described in clauses 6 and 7 above with regard to the manually operated data stations can obviously be used for disabling echo suppressors and echo cancellers when manual switching from voice conversation to data is required, which is the preferred principle of operation. Considering the type of DCE designed to be used in conjunction with manual connection set-up, it will be necessary to equip the DCE with an answering tone generator. To avoid modifying existing equipment at the data station which receives the answering tone, the following procedure may replace the operation principle of clause 6 above. The operator depresses his data button after the end of the answering tone. The modem which is to transmit the answering tone is to be agreed between the operators while still in the voice mode. + +Care must be exercised in cases of half-duplex modems where transmission of data is started from the data station which transmits the answering tone, to avoid mutilation of the initial data. + +NOTE – Where, in the half-duplex modem case, disabling of echo suppressors is not required, the answering tone need not be transmitted. However, the delay between circuit 105 and circuit 106 ON conditions should be longer than 100 ms in consideration of the echo suppressor suppression hangover time. + +## **9        Notification to ordinary telephone users** + +As both automatic calling and automatic answering data stations transmit tones to line during call establishment, a normal telephone user who becomes inadvertently connected to one will receive tone signals for a sufficient duration to indicate clearly to him that he is incorrectly connected. + +## **10       Manual selection of automatic answering, data mode and voice mode** + +It is recognized that, at the data station, means should be provided to allow the operator to select between automatic and manual answering of calls. If a call is manually answered, voice mode shall be established. Subsequent switching to the data mode shall be performed by the procedure as specified in clause 7 above. + +Selection of manual or automatic answering of subsequent calls shall be possible after entering the data mode. As an option, automatic answering may be arranged for all subsequent incoming calls. In this case, manual answering may still be achieved by keeping circuit 108/2 OFF to cause an audible signal to occur at the telephone instrument. + +The DCE shall be disconnected from the line whenever circuit 108/1 or circuit 108/2 is turned OFF by the DTE, irrespective of the means employed in establishing the connection. + +Procedures for switching to the voice mode between data transmission within the same call shall ensure that circuit 107 is turned OFF while in the voice mode. + +## **11       2100 Hz tone recognition** + +To protect the 2100 Hz tone detector against faulty operation resulting from interference generated by the interrupted calling tone, the detector may be inhibited during the ON periods of the calling tone. + +Additionally, in cases where data circuit-terminating equipment comprising automatic calling equipment is used to set up the call, the 2100 Hz detector must not respond to spurious tones which may arise from speech or service signals during call establishment. It is suggested that the answering tone detection be prevented when the 2100 Hz signal is accompanied by any other signal of comparable level within the ranges 350 Hz to 1800 Hz and 2500 Hz to 3400 Hz. + +NOTE – The relative inhibiting signal levels recommended for the echo suppressor disabling tone detector of Recommendation G.164 [2] are a useful guide for 2100 Hz tone detector inhibiting levels. + +## References + +- [1] CCITT Definition: “Terminal installation for data transmission” in *Terms and Definitions*, Geneva 1988. +- [2] CCITT Recommendation G.164 (1988), *Echo suppressors*. +- [3] ITU-T Recommendation G.165 (1993), *Echo cancellers*. +- [4] ITU-T Recommendation V.24 (1996), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE)*. +- [5] ITU-T Recommendation V.25 bis (1996), *Synchronous and asynchronous automatic dialling procedures on switched networks*. +- [6] ITU-T Recommendation V.25 ter (1995), *Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and control*. + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Telephone network and ISDN | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media | +| Series H | Transmission of non-telephone signals | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of sound-programme and television signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | Maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound-programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminal equipments and protocols for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communication | +| Series Z | Programming languages | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.250-200307-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.250-200307-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..798f17bb68112aa6b27144fbe04ac78391ff9352 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.250-200307-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,4922 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.250 + +(07/2003) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Control procedures + +--- + +**Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and +control** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.250 + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.* + +# ITU-T Recommendation V.250 + +# Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and control + +## Summary + +This version of ITU-T Rec. V.250 integrates Amendment 1 (07/2001), Amendment 2 (03/2002) and Amendment 3 (07/2003) with the 05/1999 version of the Recommendation. + +This Recommendation defines commands and responses for use by a DTE to control a V-series DCE using serial data interchange over an asynchronous interface. It contains four elements: + +- codifies existing practice in common GSTN-DCE that use the ATtention (AT) command set; +- defines a format for orderly extension of the AT command set; +- provides a set for standardized extensions for common functions to identify the DCE, to control the DTE-DCE interface, and to control DCE-DCE protocols (signal conversion, error control and data compression); +- provides a mapping for these commands into V.25 *bis* frame format for use with DCEs employing synchronous serial interfaces. + +## Source + +ITU-T Recommendation V.250 was approved on 14 July 2003 by ITU-T Study Group 16 (2001-2004) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure. + +## Keywords + +AT Commands, data modems, data transmission, DCE control. + +## FOREWORD + +The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 2004 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. + +# CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Introduction and scope..... | 1 | +| 2 References..... | 1 | +| 2.1 Normative references..... | 1 | +| 2.2 Informative references..... | 2 | +| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 3 | +| 3.1 Definitions ..... | 3 | +| 3.2 Abbreviations ..... | 4 | +| 4 Physical layer..... | 4 | +| 4.1 Circuits ..... | 4 | +| 4.2 Character formatting..... | 5 | +| 4.3 Data rates ..... | 5 | +| 5 Syntax and procedures ..... | 5 | +| 5.1 Alphabet ..... | 5 | +| 5.2 DTE commands lines ..... | 6 | +| 5.3 Basic Syntax commands..... | 7 | +| 5.4 Extended Syntax commands..... | 8 | +| 5.5 Issuing commands ..... | 12 | +| 5.6 Executing commands..... | 12 | +| 5.7 DCE responses..... | 13 | +| 5.8 Manufacturer-specific characteristics..... | 16 | +| 6 Functions ..... | 17 | +| 6.1 Generic DCE control ..... | 18 | +| 6.2 DTE-DCE interface commands..... | 25 | +| 6.3 Call control ..... | 37 | +| 6.4 Modulation control commands..... | 48 | +| 6.5 Error control commands ..... | 60 | +| 6.6 Data compression commands ..... | 68 | +| 6.7 DCE testing ..... | 73 | +| 6.8 PCM DCE commands ..... | 85 | +| 6.9 V.59 Command (+TMO)..... | 91 | +| Appendix I – Summary of basic and extended format commands ..... | 93 | +| Appendix II – DCE configuration, dialling, negotiation and reporting, example session ..... | 95 | +| Appendix III – Encapsulation of V.250 messages in V.25 bis DCE ..... | 96 | +| III.1 Scope ..... | 96 | +| III.2 Encapsulation of V.250 messages ..... | 96 | +| III.3 Applicable V.250 commands ..... | 96 | +| III.4 Applicable V.250 responses ..... | 97 | + + + +# ITU-T Recommendation V.250 + +# Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and control + +# 1 Introduction and scope + +This Recommendation is applicable to the interconnection of Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE) employing serial binary data operation via the ITU-T Recs V.100-series interchange circuits. + +This Recommendation contains four elements: + +- codifies existing practice in common Asynchronous GSTN-DCE that use the ATtention (AT) command set. It identifies the protocol elements, procedures, and behaviours that were found to be held in common among a large portion of DCE manufacturers. It is intended, as much as possible, to preserve compatibility between DCEs and DTEs. Most DCEs implement a number of extensions and behavioural differences beyond the descriptions in this Recommendation; such extensions and differences are explicitly permitted by this Recommendation (see 5.8); +- defines a format for extension of the AT command set in an orderly fashion. It reserves the "+" command prefix to be used by other standardized extensions, such as those found in ITU-T Recs T.31 and T.32 (Asynchronous Facsimile DCE Control); +- provides a set of standardized extensions, based on the extended "+" command format. These commands identify the DCE, control the DTE-DCE interface, and control DCE-DCE protocol behaviour (signal conversion, error control and data compression); +- provides a mapping of the commands defined in this Recommendation into V.25 *bis* frame format for use with DCEs employing synchronous serial interfaces. See Appendix III. + +The procedures described for automatic calling equipment conforming to this Recommendation allow interworking with automatic answering equipment conforming to ITU-T Recs V.25 and V.25 *bis*. + +# 2 References + +## 2.1 Normative references + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation. + +- ITU-T Recommendation Q.23 (1988), *Technical features of push-button telephone sets*. +- ITU-T Recommendation T.50 (1992), *International Reference Alphabet (IRA) (Formerly International Alphabet No. 5 or IA5) – Information technology – 7-bit coded character set for information interchange*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.4 (1988), *General structure of signals of International Alphabet No. 5 code for character oriented data transmission over public telephone networks*. +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 *bis* (2000), *Procedures for the identification and selection of common modes of operation between data circuit-terminating equipments (DCEs) and* + +*between data terminal equipments (DTEs) over the public switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits.* + +- ITU-T Recommendation V.24 (2000), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between data terminal equipment (DTE) and data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE).* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.25 (1996), *Automatic answering equipment and general procedures for automatic calling equipment on the general switched telephone network including procedures for disabling of echo control devices for both manually and automatically established calls.* + +Other relevant Recommendations are listed in the Supplement 1 to this Recommendation. + +## **2.2 Informative references** + +- ITU-T Recommendation T.31 (1995), *Asynchronous facsimile DCE control – Service Class 1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation T.32 (1995), *Asynchronous facsimile DCE control – Service Class 2.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 (2000), *Procedures for starting sessions of data transmission over the public switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.14 (1993), *Transmission of start-stop characters over synchronous bearer channels.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.18 (2000), *Operational and interworking requirements for DCEs operating in the text telephone mode.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.21 (1988), *300 bits per second duplex modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.22 (1988), *1200 bits per second duplex modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.22 bis (1988), *2400 bits per second duplex modem using the frequency division technique standardized for use on the general switched telephone network and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.23 (1988), *600/1200-baud modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.26 bis (1988), *2400/1200 bits per second modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.26 ter (1988), *2400 bits per second duplex modem using the echo cancellation technique standardized for use on the general switched telephone network and on point-to-point 2-wire leased telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.27 ter (1988), *4800/2400 bits per second modem standardized for use in the general switched telephone network.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.32 (1993), *A family of 2-wire, duplex modems operating at data signalling rates of up to 9600 bit/s for use on the general switched telephone network and on leased telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.32 bis (1991), *A duplex modem operating at data signalling rates of up to 14 400 bit/s for use on the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point 2-wire telephone-type circuits.* + +- ITU-T Recommendation V.34 (1998), *A modem operating at data signalling rates of up to 33 600 bit/s for use on the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point 2-wire telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.42 (2002), *Error-correcting procedures for DCEs using asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.42 bis (1990), *Data compression procedures for data circuit-terminating equipment (DCE) using error correction procedures.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.44 (2000), *Data compression procedures.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.54 (1988), *Loop test devices for modems.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.58 (1994), *Management information model for V-Series DCEs.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.59 (2000), *Managed objects for diagnostic information of public switched telephone network connected V-series modem DCEs.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.90 (1998), *A digital modem and analogue modem pair for use on the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) at data signalling rates of up to 56 000 bit/s downstream and up to 33 600 bit/s upstream.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.91 (1999), *A digital modem operating at data signalling rates of up to 64 000 bit/s for use on a 4-wire circuit switched connection and on leased point-to-point 4-wire digital circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.92 (2000), *Enhancements to Recommendation V.90.* +- ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002, *Information technology – Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation.* + +NOTE – See Supplement 1 to this Recommendation for additional informative references. + +# 3 Definitions and abbreviations + +## 3.1 Definitions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**3.1.1 command state:** In Command State, the DCE is not communicating with a remote station, and the DCE is ready to accept commands. Data signals from the DTE on circuit 103 are treated as command lines and processed by the DCE, and DCE responses are sent to the DTE on circuit 104. The DCE enters this state upon power-up, and when a call is disconnected. + +**3.1.2 online command state:** In Online Command State, the DCE is communicating with a remote station, but treats signals from the DTE on circuit 103 as command lines and sends responses to the DTE on circuit 104. Depending on the implementation, data received from the remote station during Online Command State may be either discarded or retained in the DCE until Online Data State is once again entered (by a command from the DTE). Data previously transmitted by the local DTE and buffered by the DCE may be transmitted from the buffer to the remote DCE during Online Command State, or it may be discarded or transmission deferred until Online Data State is once again entered. Online Command State may be entered from Online Data state by a mechanism defined in 6.2.9 or by other manufacturer-defined means. + +**3.1.3 online data state:** In Online Data State, the DCE is communicating with a remote station. Data signals from the DTE on circuit 103 are treated as data and transmitted to the remote station, and data received from the remote station are delivered to the DTE on circuit 104. Data and control signals are monitored by the DCE to detect events such as loss of the remote connection and DTE requests for disconnection or switching to Online Command State. Online Data State is entered by successful completion of a command to originate or answer a call, by automatically + +answering a call, or by a DTE command to return to Online Data State from Online Command State. + +**3.1.4 direct mode:** Mode of Online Data State whereby the V.24 circuits 103 (transmit data) and 104 (received data) transfer data at the same rate or rates in use on the DCE-to-DCE communication channels. The DCE does not buffer data in either direction, nor does it implement flow control. For DCE modulation methods that transfer data synchronously, this mode implies the use of V.14 synchronous/asynchronous protocol within the DCE. + +**3.1.5 buffered mode:** Mode of Online Data State whereby the V.24 circuits 103 (transmit data) and 104 (received data) transfer data at data rates independent of the rates in use on the DCE-to-DCE communication channels. The DCE buffers the data rate differences as required. Neither error control nor data compression is used. For DCE modulation methods that transfer data synchronously, this mode implies the use of V.14 synchronous/asynchronous protocol within the DCE. For DCE modulation methods that transfer data asynchronously, asynchronous start-stop framing is used on the DCE-to-DCE communications channels. + +**3.1.6 leadin:** Commands defined using the extended syntax defined in 5.2.3 begin with a "+" character. The second character is reserved for a particular function or application. That two-character sequence, "+" is the Leadin. + +**3.1.7 [...]:** Square brackets are used to indicate that the enclosed items are optional. The square brackets themselves do not appear in the command line. + +**3.1.8 <...>:** Angle brackets are used to enclose the names of other syntactical elements. When those elements appear in an actual command line, the actual element is used and the angle brackets are omitted. + +All other characters, including "?", "=", parentheses, etc., shall appear in commands as written. + +## 3.2 Abbreviations + +This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations: + +CCITT International Telephone and Telegraph Consultative Committee + +IRA International Reference Alphabet (ITU-T Rec. T.50) + +ITU-T International Telecommunication Union – Telecommunication Standardization Sector + +# 4 Physical layer + +The circuits listed in 4.1 are intercepted and controlled by the DCE. The DCE is designed so that it will function properly if only these circuits are connected or implemented. V.24 circuit designators are listed in this clause. + +## 4.1 Circuits + +Signal Ground (Circuit 102) – Connection of this circuit is required for proper recognition of signals on other circuits. + +Transmitted Data (Circuit 103) – While in command state or online command state, data signals are processed by the DCE and not transmitted to the remote station. + +Received Data (Circuit 104) – While in command state or online command state, data received from the remote station may be ignored (see 3.1.2 for the definition of online command state), and the DCE generates responses on this circuit. + +Data Terminal Ready (Circuit 108/2) – The DCE monitors the effect of changes in the state of this circuit on the operation of the underlying DCE and operates accordingly. For example, if the DCE + +responds to an on-to-off transition on this circuit by disconnecting a call, the DCE will act accordingly by returning from online data state to command state. + +Received Line Signal Detector (Circuit 109) – The DCE may intercept this signal so that the issuance of result codes can be properly coordinated with transitions on this signal. + +Calling Indicator (Circuit 125) – The DCE may intercept this signal so that it can detect network alerting signals and automatically answer, if so conditioned by the appropriate command (S0, see 6.3.8). + +## **4.2 Character formatting** + +During command state and online command state, data transmitted between the DTE and DCE shall conform to the requirements for start-stop data transmission specified in ITU-T Rec. V.4 and ISO 1177. Parity may be even, odd, mark, space or not used. Each character shall have at least one complete stop element. The DCE should accept commands using any combination of parity and stop elements supported during online data state. These shall include, as a minimum, the following combinations, as defined in Annex B/V.42, each of which consists of ten total bits (including the start element): + +- 7 data bits, even parity, 1 stop element; +- 7 data bits, odd parity, 1 stop element; +- 7 data bits, space parity, 1 stop element; +- 7 data bits, mark parity, 1 stop element (7 data bits, no parity bit, 2 stop elements); +- 8 data bits, no parity, 1 stop element. + +During online data state, the DCE shall be transparent to changes in data format; the use of a particular format during command state should not restrict the use of other formats that are supported during online data state. However, DCE responses issued to indicate transition from online data state back to command state are issued using the same format and parity as the last command line issued by the DTE (see 5.7), and the DTE must therefore be prepared to recognize these responses even though the character format may have been changed. + +See 6.2.11 for a command to explicitly select the DTE-DCE character format. + +## **4.3 Data rates** + +The DCE shall be able to accept commands at either 1200 bit/s or 9600 bit/s. It is desirable that the DCE be able to accept commands and automatically detect the rate being used by the DTE at all rates supported by the DCE on the DTE-DCE interface. The DCE may provide a strap, switch, or other facility to define the rate at which the DTE is operating; however, while the rate is so selected, the DCE shall continue to be capable of accepting commands at either 1200 bit/s or 9600 bit/s. See 6.2.10 for a command to explicitly select the DTE-DCE rate. + +When operating in the online command state, the DCE is not required to accept commands at other than the online data rate; i.e., the requirement to accept commands at 1200 bit/s or 9600 bit/s does not apply during online command state. + +# **5 Syntax and procedures** + +## **5.1 Alphabet** + +The T.50 International Alphabet 5 (hereinafter cited as "IA5") is used in this Recommendation. Only the low-order seven bits of each character are significant to the DCE; any eighth or higher-order bit(s), if present, are ignored for the purpose of identifying commands and parameters. Lower-case characters (IA5 values from 6/1 to 7/10) are considered identical to their upper-case + +equivalents (IA5 values from 4/1 to 5/10) when received by the DCE from the DTE. Result codes from the DCE which are defined in this Recommendation shall be in upper case. + +## 5.2 DTE commands lines + +In the descriptions that follow, words enclosed in **** are references to syntactical elements defined in this Recommendation. When they appear in a command line, the brackets are not used. Words enclosed in **[square brackets]** represent optional items; such items may be omitted from the command line at the point where they are specified, and when they appear the square brackets are not included in the command line. Other characters that appear in syntax descriptions shall appear in the places shown. + +In the following subclauses regarding DTE commands, references are made to responses issued by the DCE which are defined in 5.7. In order to provide a clearer presentation, DCE responses are mentioned in terms of their alphabetic format; the actual response issued will depend on the setting of parameters that affect response formats (e.g., **Q** and **V** commands). + +### 5.2.1 Command line general format + +A command line is made up of three elements: the prefix, the body, and the termination character. + +The command line prefix consists of the characters "**AT**" (IA5 4/1, 5/4) or "**at**" (IA5 6/1, 7/4), or, to repeat the execution of the previous command line, the characters "**A**" (IA5 4/1, 2/15) or "**a**" (IA5 6/1, 2/15). + +The body is made up of individual commands as specified later in this Recommendation. Space characters (IA5 2/0) are ignored and may be used freely for formatting purposes, unless they are embedded in numeric or string constants (see 5.4.2.1 or 5.4.2.2). The termination character may not appear in the body. The DCE shall be capable of accepting at least 40 characters in the body. + +The termination character may be selected by a user option (parameter **S3**), the default being CR (IA5 0/13). + +### 5.2.2 Command line editing + +The character defined by parameter **S5** (default, BS [IA5 0/8]) is intended to be interpreted as a request from the DTE to the DCE to delete the previous character; the precise action undertaken is manufacturer-specific. Any control characters (IA5 0/0 through 1/15, inclusive) that remain in the command line after receipt of the termination character shall be ignored by the DCE. + +The DCE checks characters from the DTE first to see if they match the termination character (**S3**), then the editing character (**S5**), before checking for other characters. This insures that these characters will be properly recognized even if they are set to values that the DCE uses for other purposes. If **S3** and **S5** are set to the same value, a matching character will be treated as matching **S3** (**S3** is checked before **S5**). + +### 5.2.3 Command line echo + +The DCE may echo characters received from the DTE during command state and online command state back to the DTE, depending on the setting of the **E** command. If so enabled, characters received from the DTE are echoed at the same rate, parity, and format as received. Echoing characters not recognized as valid in the command line or of incomplete or improperly-formed command line prefixes is manufacturer-specific (see 5.8). + +### 5.2.4 Repeating a command line + +If the prefix "**A**" or "**a**" is received (IA5 4/1, 2/15 or 6/1, 2/15), the DCE shall immediately execute once again the body of the preceding command line. No editing is possible, and no termination character is necessary. A command line may be repeated multiple times through this mechanism, if desired. Responses to the repeated command line shall be issued using the parity and format of the + +original command line, and the rate of the "A/". If "A/" is received before any command line has been executed, the preceding command line is assumed to have been empty (that results in an **OK** result code). + +### 5.2.5 Types of DTE commands + +There are two types of commands: action commands and parameter commands. + +Action commands may be "executed" (to invoke a particular function of the equipment, which generally involves more than the simple storage of a value for later use), or "tested" (to determine whether or not the equipment implements the action command, and, if subparameters are associated with the action, the ranges of subparameter values that are supported). + +Parameters may be "set" (to store a value or values for later use), "read" (to determine the current value or values stored), or "tested" (to determine whether or not the equipment implements the parameter, and the ranges of values supported). + +### 5.2.6 DTE command syntax + +Clause 5.3 defines Basic Syntax DTE commands, which are implemented in common DCE. This Recommendation also defines Extended Syntax DTE commands in 5.4. Commands of either type may be included in command lines, in any order. + +## 5.3 Basic Syntax commands + +### 5.3.1 Basic Syntax command format + +The format of Basic Syntax commands, except for the D and S commands, is as follows: + +**[]** + +where is either a single character, or the "&" character (IA5 2/6) followed by a single character. Characters used in shall be taken from the set of alphabetic characters. + + may be a string of one or more characters from "0" through "9" representing a decimal integer value. Commands that expect a are noted in the description of the command (see clause 6). If a command expects and it is missing ( is immediately followed in the command line by another or the termination character), the value "0" is assumed. If a command does not expect a and a number is present, an **ERROR** is generated. All leading "0"s in are ignored by the DCE. + +Additional commands may follow a command (and associated parameter, if any) on the same command line without any character required for separation. The actions of some commands cause the remainder of the command line to be ignored (e.g., **A**). + +See the **D** command for details on the format of the information that follows it. + +### 5.3.2 S-parameters + +Commands that begin with the letter "S" constitute a special group of parameters known as "S-parameters". These differ from other commands in important respects. The number following the "S" indicates the "parameter number" being referenced. If the number is not recognized as a valid parameter number, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +Immediately following this number, either a "?" or "=" character (IA5 3/15 or 3/13, respectively) shall appear. "?" is used to read the current value of the indicated S-parameter; "=" is used to set the S-parameter to a new value. + +**S?** + +**S= []** + +If the "=" is used, the new value to be stored in the S-parameter is specified in decimal following the "=". If no value is given (i.e., the end of the command line occurs or the next command follows immediately), the S-parameter specified may be set to 0, or an **ERROR** result code issued and the stored value left unchanged. The ranges of acceptable values are given in the description of each S-parameter. + +If the "?" is used, the DCE transmits a single line of information text to the DTE. For S-parameters defined in this Recommendation, the text portion of this information text consists of exactly three characters, giving the value of the S-parameter in decimal, with leading zeroes included. + +## **5.4 Extended Syntax commands** + +### **5.4.1 Command naming rules** + +Both actions and parameters have names, which are used in the related commands. Names always begin with the character "+" (IA5 2/15). Following the "+", from one to sixteen (16) additional characters appear in the command name. These characters shall be selected from the following set: + +| | | +|---------------------------|------------------------| +| A through Z | (IA5 4/1 through 5/10) | +| 0 through 9 | (IA5 3/0 through 3/9) | +| ! | (IA5 2/1) | +| % | (IA5 2/5) | +| | (IA5 2/13) | +| . | (IA5 2/14) | +| / | (IA5 2/15) | +| : | (IA5 3/10) | +| _ | (IA5 5/15) | + +The first character following the "+" shall be an alphabetic character in the range of "A" through "Z". This first character generally implies the application in which a command is used or the standards committee that defined it (e.g., command names beginning with "F" are generally associated with facsimile-related standards). See Appendix I for information on first command characters reserved for use by particular standards committees. All other + leadin character sequences are reserved for future standardization by the ITU-T. + +The command interpreter in the Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE) considers lower-case characters to be the same as their upper-case equivalents; therefore, command names defined in standards referencing this Recommendation that include alphabetic characters should be defined using only the upper-case characters. + +Standards that reference this Recommendation may choose to establish internal naming conventions that permit implicit recognition of a name as an action or as a parameter. For example, the standard could choose to end all action names with an exclamation point ("!"), or all parameter names with a percent sign ("%"). This Recommendation imposes no such conventions, however. + +### **5.4.2 Values** + +When subparameters are associated with the execution of an action, or when setting a parameter, the command may include specification of values. This is indicated by the appearance of **** in the descriptions below. + +**** shall consist of either a numeric constant or a string constant. + +#### 5.4.2.1 Numeric constants + +Numeric constants are expressed in decimal, hexadecimal, or binary. In standards that reference this Recommendation, the definition of each command shall specify which form is used for values associated with that command; however, such standards may, in introductory information, specify a "default" type of numeric constant that is assumed for commands within that standard that do not explicitly specify the type. Such standards shall also define the minimum and maximum acceptable values. + +Decimal numeric constants shall consist of a sequence of one or more of the characters "0" (IA5 3/0) through "9" (IA5 3/9), inclusive. + +Hexadecimal numeric constants shall consist of a sequence of one or more of the characters "0" (IA5 3/0) through "9" (IA5 3/h), inclusive, and "A" (IA5 4/1) through "F" (IA5 4/6) inclusive. The characters "A" through "F" represent the equivalent decimal values 10 through 15. + +Binary numeric constants shall consist of a sequence of one or more of the characters "0" (IA5 3/0) and "1" (IA5 3/1). + +In all numeric constants, the most significant digit is specified first. Leading "0" characters shall be ignored by the DCE. No spaces, hyphens, periods, commas, parentheses, or other generally-accepted numeric formatting characters are permitted in numeric constants; note in particular that no "H" suffix is appended to the end of hexadecimal constants. + +#### 5.4.2.2 String constants + +String constants shall consist of a sequence of displayable IA5 characters, each in the range from 2/0 to 7/15, inclusive, except for the characters "" (IA5 2/2) and "\" (IA5 5/12). String constants shall be bounded at the beginning and end by the double-quote character (" ", IA5 2/2). + +Any character value may be included in the string by representing it as a backslash ("\") character followed by two hexadecimal digits. For example, "\0D" is a string consisting of the single character (IA5 0/13). If the "\" character itself is to be represented in a string, it shall be encoded as "\5C". The double-quote character, used as the beginning and ending string delimiter, shall be represented within a string constant as "\22". Standards that reference this Recommendation may prohibit use of this "\" mechanism if only displayable characters are permitted in string constants in that standard and if the double-quote character is not permitted within string constants; in this case, the "\" character shall be treated as any other IA5 character included within a string constant. + +A "null" string constant, or a string constant of zero length, is represented by two adjacent delimiters (""). + +Standards that reference this Recommendation shall specify, for each string value, any limitations on the characters that may appear within the string, and the maximum and minimum acceptable string length. + +#### 5.4.2.3 Compound values + +Actions may have more than one subparameter associated with them, and parameters may have more than one value. These are known as "compound values", and their treatment is the same in both actions and parameters. + +A compound value consists of any combination of numeric and string values (as defined in the description of the action or parameter). The comma character (IA5 2/12) shall be included as a separator, before the second and all subsequent values in the compound value. If a value is not specified (i.e., defaults assumed), the required comma separator shall be specified; however, trailing comma characters may be omitted if all associated values are also omitted. + +### 5.4.3 Action commands + +#### 5.4.3.1 Action execution command syntax + +There are two general types of action commands: those that have associated subparameter values that affect only that invocation of the command, and those that have no subparameters. + +If subparameters are associated with a command, the definition of the action command shall indicate, for each subparameter, whether the specification of a value for that subparameter is mandatory or optional. For optional subparameters, the definition shall indicate the assumed (default) value for the subparameter if no value is specified for that subparameter; the assumed value may be either a previous value (i.e., the value of an omitted subparameter remains the same as the previous invocation of the same command, or is determined by a separate parameter or other mechanism), or a fixed value (e.g., the value of an omitted subparameter is assumed to be zero). Generally, the default value for numeric subparameters is 0, and the default value for string subparameters is "" (empty string). + +The following syntax is used for actions that have no subparameters: + +**+** + +The following syntax is used for actions that have one subparameter: + +**+[=]** + +The following syntax is used for actions that have two or more subparameters: + +**+[=]** + +For actions that accept subparameters, if all subparameters are defined as being optional, and the default values for all subparameters are satisfactory, the Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) may use the first syntax above (i.e., omit the "=" from the action execution command as well as all of the subparameter value string). + +If the named action is implemented in the DCE and other relevant criteria are met (e.g., the DCE is in the proper state), the command shall be executed with any indicated subparameters. If **** is not recognized, the DCE issues the **ERROR** result code and terminates processing of the command line. An **ERROR** is also generated if a subparameter is specified for an action that does not accept subparameters, if too many subparameters are specified, if a mandatory subparameter is not specified, if a value is specified of the wrong type, or if a value is specified that is not within the supported range. + +#### 5.4.3.2 Action test command syntax + +The DTE may test if an action command is implemented in the DCE by using the syntax: + +**+=?** + +If the DCE does not recognize the indicated name, it shall return an **ERROR** result code and terminate processing of the command line. If the DCE does recognize the action name, it shall return an **OK** result code. If the named action accepts one or more subparameters, the DCE shall send an information text response to the DTE, prior to the **OK** result code, specifying the values supported by the DCE for each such subparameter, and possibly additional information. The format of this information text is defined for each action command; general formats for specification of sets and ranges of numeric values are described in 5.7.1 and 5.7.2. + +### 5.4.4 Parameter commands + +#### 5.4.4.1 Parameter types + +Parameters may be defined as "read-only" or "read-write". "Read-only" parameters are used to provide status or identifying information to the DTE, but are not settable by the DTE; attempting to + +set their value is an error. In some cases (specified in the description of the individual parameter), the DCE may ignore attempts to set the value of such parameters rather than respond with an **ERROR** result code, if the continued correct operation of the interface between the DCE and DTE will not be affected by such action. Read-only parameters may be read and tested. + +"Read-write" parameters may be set by the DTE, to store a value or values for later use. Read-write parameters may be set, read, and tested. + +Parameters may take either a single value, or multiple (compound) values. Each value may be either numeric or string; the definition of the parameter shall specify the type of value for each subparameter. Attempting to store a string value in a numeric parameter, or a numeric value in a string parameter, is an error. + +#### 5.4.4.2 Parameter set command syntax + +The definition of the parameter shall indicate, for each value, whether the specification of that value is mandatory or optional. For optional values, the definition shall indicate the assumed (default) value if none is specified; the assumed value may be either a previous value (i.e., the value of an omitted subparameter retains its previous value), or a fixed value (e.g., the value of an omitted subparameter is assumed to be zero). Generally, the default value for numeric parameters is 0, and the default value for string parameters is "" (empty string). + +The following syntax is used for parameters that accept a single value: + +**+=[]** + +The following syntax is used for parameters that accept more than one value: + +**+=[]** + +If the named parameter is implemented in the DCE, all mandatory values are specified, and all values are valid according to the definition of the parameter, the specified values shall be stored. If **** is not recognized, one or more mandatory values are omitted, or one or more values are of the wrong type or outside the permitted range, the DCE issues the **ERROR** result code and terminates processing of the command line. An **ERROR** is also generated if too many values are specified. In case of an error, all previous values of the parameter are unaffected. + +#### 5.4.4.3 Parameter read command syntax + +The DTE may determine the current value or values stored in a parameter by using the following syntax: + +**+?** + +If the named parameter is implemented in the DCE, the current values stored for the parameter are sent to the DTE in an information text response. The format of this response is described in the definition of the parameter. Generally, the values will be sent in the same form in which they would be issued by the DTE in a parameter setting command; if multiple values are supported, they will generally be separated by commas, as in a parameter setting command. + +#### 5.4.4.4 Parameter test command syntax + +The DTE may test if a parameter is implemented in the DCE, and determine the supported values, by using the syntax: + +**+=?** + +If the DCE does not recognize the indicated name, it returns an **ERROR** result code and terminates processing of the command line. If the DCE does recognize the parameter name, it shall return an information text response to the DTE, followed by an **OK** result code. The information text response shall indicate the values supported by the DCE for each such subparameter, and possibly + +additional information. The format of this information text is defined for each parameter; general formats for specification of sets and ranges of numeric values are described in 5.7.1 and 5.7.2. + +### **5.4.5 Additional syntax rules** + +#### **5.4.5.1 Concatenating commands after extended syntax commands** + +Additional commands may follow an extended syntax command on the same command line if a semicolon (";", IA5 3/11) is inserted after the preceding extended command as a separator. The semicolon is not necessary when the extended syntax command is the last command on the command line. + +#### **5.4.5.2 Concatenating commands after basic format commands** + +Extended syntax commands may appear on the same command line after a basic syntax command without a separator, in the same manner as concatenation of basic syntax commands. + +## **5.5 Issuing commands** + +All characters in a command line shall be issued at the same data rate, and with the same parity and format. + +The DCE shall ignore any command line that is not properly terminated. The DCE may consider 30 seconds of mark idle time between any two characters as an improperly terminated command line. In this case the DCE may or may not generate an **ERROR** message. The DCE shall ignore any characters received from the DTE that are not part of a properly-formatted command line. + +If the maximum number of characters that the DCE can accept in the body is exceeded, an **ERROR** result code shall be generated after the command line is terminated. + +The DTE shall not begin issuing a subsequent command line until at least one-tenth of a second has elapsed after receipt of the entire result code issued by the DCE in response to the preceding command line. + +## **5.6 Executing commands** + +Upon receipt of the termination character, the DCE shall commence execution of the commands in the command line in the order received from the DTE. Should execution of a command result in an error, or a character be not recognized as a valid command, execution is terminated, the remainder of the command line is ignored, and the **ERROR** result code is issued. Otherwise, if all commands execute correctly, only the result code associated with the last command shall be issued; result codes for preceding commands are suppressed. If no commands appear in the command line, the **OK** result code is issued. + +### **5.6.1 Aborting commands** + +Some action commands that require time to execute may be aborted while in progress; these are explicitly noted in the description of the command. Aborting of commands is accomplished by the transmission from the DTE to the DCE of any character. A single character shall be sufficient to abort the command in progress; however, characters transmitted during the first 125 milliseconds after transmission of the termination character shall be ignored (to allow for the DTE to append additional control characters such as line feed after the command line termination character). To insure that the aborting character is recognized by the DCE, it should be sent at the same rate as the preceding command line; the DCE may ignore characters sent at other rates. When such an aborting event is recognized by the DCE, it shall terminate the command in progress and return an appropriate result code to the DTE, as specified for the particular command. + +### 5.6.2 Handling of invalid numbers and S-parameter values + +The DCE shall react to undefined numbers and S-parameter values in one of three ways: + +- 1) issue the **ERROR** result code, and leave the previous value of the parameter unchanged; +- 2) issue the **OK** result code, and leave the previous value of the parameter unchanged; or +- 3) issue the **OK** result code, and set the parameter value to the valid value nearest to that specified in the command line. + +The description of each command may specify which of these three techniques shall be used to handle invalid parameter values for that command or parameter. If the description does not specify the handling technique, it shall be defined by the manufacturer. + +## 5.7 DCE responses + +While in command state and online command state, the DCE shall issue responses using the same rate, word length, and parity as the most recently received DTE command line. In the event that no DTE command has yet been received, rate, word length, and parity used will depend on the capabilities of the DCE. + +When the DCE transitions from the command state or online command state to the online data state, the result code **CONNECT** should be issued at the bit rate and parity used during the command state. When the DCE transitions from the online data state to the command state or online command state, the result codes should be issued at the bit rate used during the online data state. Thereafter, any unsolicited result codes should use the bit rate and parity of the last command line issued by the DTE to the DCE. + +The characters of a response shall be contiguous, with no more than 100 milliseconds of mark idle issued between characters in addition to stop elements. + +### 5.7.1 Responses + +There are two types of responses that may be issued by the DCE: information text and result codes. + +Information text responses consist of three parts: a header, text, and a trailer. The characters transmitted for the header are determined by a user setting (see the **V** command, 6.2.6). The trailer consists of two characters, being the character having the ordinal value of parameter **S3** followed by the character having the ordinal value of parameter **S4**. Information text specified in this Recommendation always consists of a single line; information text returned in response to manufacturer-specific commands may contain multiple lines, and the text may therefore include IA5 CR, LF, and other formatting characters to improve readability. + +Result codes consist of three parts: a header, the result text, and a trailer. The characters transmitted for the header and trailer are determined by a user setting (see the **V** command, 6.2.6). The result text may be transmitted as a number or as a string, depending on a user-selectable setting (see the **V** command). + +There are three types of result codes: final, intermediate, and unsolicited. + +A final result code indicates the completion of a full DCE action and a willingness to accept new commands from the DTE. + +An intermediate result code is a report of the progress of a DCE action. The **CONNECT** result code is an intermediate result code (others may be defined by manufacturers). In the case of a dialling or answering command, the DCE moves from command state to online data state, and issues a **CONNECT** result code. This is an intermediate result code for the DCE because it is not prepared to accept commands from the DTE while in online data state. When the DCE moves back to the command state, it will then issue a final result code (such as **OK** or **NO CARRIER**). + +Unsolicited result codes (such as **RING**) indicate the occurrence of an event not directly associated with the issuance of a command from the DTE. + +Table 1 indicates result codes that shall be implemented by the DCE, their numeric equivalents, and a brief description of the use of each. In clause 6, the description of each command includes the specific result codes that may be issued in relation to that command and the circumstances under which they may be issued. + +**Table 1/V.250 – Result codes** + +| Result code
(ATV1)
| Numeric
(ATV0)
| Description | +|-------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OK | 0 | Acknowledges execution of a command | +| CONNECT | 1 | A connection has been established; the DCE is moving from command state to online data state | +| RING | 2 | The DCE has detected an incoming call signal from the network | +| NO CARRIER | 3 | The connection has been terminated or the attempt to establish a connection failed | +| ERROR | 4 | Command not recognized, command line maximum length exceeded, parameter value invalid, or other problem with processing the command line | +| NO DIALTONE | 6 | No dial tone detected | +| BUSY | 7 | Engaged (busy) signal detected | +| NO ANSWER | 8 | "@" (Wait for Quiet Answer) dial modifier was used, but remote ringing followed by five seconds of silence was not detected before expiration of the connection timer (S7) | +| CONNECT | Manufacturer-specific | Same as CONNECT, but includes manufacturer-specific text that may specify DTE speed, line speed, error control, data compression, or other status | + +### 5.7.2 Extended syntax result codes + +Extended syntax result codes may be issued in response to either basic or extended commands, or both. The appropriate responses shall be specified in the definitions of the commands, the responses, or both. + +The general format of extended syntax result codes is the same as result codes defined in TIA-602 with regard to headers and trailers. The characters specified in S-parameters **S3** and **S4** shall be used in headers and trailers of extended syntax result codes as they are in basic format result codes. The setting of the "**V**" command shall affect the headers and trailers associated with extended syntax result codes in the same manner as basic format result codes; however, unlike basic format result codes, extended syntax result codes have no numeric equivalent, and are always issued in alphabetic form. + +Extended syntax result codes shall be subject to suppression by the "**Q1**" command, as with basic format result codes. The issuance of extended syntax result codes shall not be affected by the setting of the "**X**" command. + +Extended syntax result codes may be either final, intermediate, or unsolicited; the type shall be indicated in the definition of the result code. + +Extended syntax result codes shall be prefixed by the "+" character to avoid duplication of basic format result codes specified in TIA-602 and by manufacturers. Following the "+" character, the name of the result code appears; result code names shall follow the same rules as command names (see 5.4.1). It is strongly advised that the reservation of the first character of command names noted + +in Appendix I also be observed with regard to the assignment of names of extended syntax result codes. + +Extended syntax result codes may include the reporting of values. The definition of the result code shall specify whether or not values are appended to the result code, and, if so, how many, their types, and their assumed default values if omitted. When no values are to be reported, the result code appears in the simplest form: + +**+** + +If a single value is to be reported, the form of the result code shall be: + +**+: ** + +Note that a single space character (ASCII 20h) separates the colon character (ASCII 3Ah) from the ; no space appears between the result code name and the colon. If multiple values are to be reported with the result code, the form is: + +**+: ** + +where follows the rules specified in 5.4.2.3. + +### **5.7.3 Information text formats for test commands** + +In general, the format of information text returned by extended syntax commands shall be specified in the definition of the command. This clause describes recommended formats for information text returned in response to action test (for actions that accept one or more subparameters) and parameter test commands. The definitions of the responses to such testing commands, as described in the definitions of the associated commands in standards that reference this Recommendation, may use this recommended format or any other suitable format that is adequately specified. + +Note that the DCE may insert intermediate characters in very long information text responses, in order to avoid overrunning DTE receive buffers. If intermediate characters are included, the DCE shall not include the character sequences "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of these information text responses. + +#### **5.7.3.1 Range of values** + +When the action accepts a single numeric subparameter, or the parameter accepts only one numeric value, the set of supported values may be presented in the information text as an ordered list of values. The list shall be preceded by a left parenthesis ("(", IA5 2/8), and is followed by a right parenthesis (")", IA5 2/9). If only a single value is supported, it shall appear between the parentheses. If more than one value is supported, then the values may be listed individually, separated by comma characters (IA5 2/12), or, when a continuous range of values is supported, by the first value in the range, followed by a hyphen character (IA5 2/13), followed by the last value in the range. The specification of single values and ranges of values may be intermixed within a single information text. In all cases, the supported values shall be indicated in ascending order. + +For example, the following are some examples of value range indications: + +- | | | +|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| (0) | Only the value 0 is supported. | +| (1,2,3) | The values 1, 2, and 3 are supported. | +| (1-3) | The values 1 through 3 are supported. | +| (0,4,5,6,9,11,12) | The several listed values are supported. | +| (0,4-6,9,11-12) | An alternative expression of the above list. | + +#### 5.7.3.2 Compound range of values + +When the action accepts more than one subparameter, or the parameter accepts more than one value, the set of supported values may be presented as a list of the parenthetically-enclosed value range strings described in 5.7.3.1 above, separated by commas. For example, the information text in response to testing an action that accepts three subparameters, and supports various ranges for each of them, could appear as follows: + +**(0),(1-3),(0,4-6,9,11-12)** + +This indicates that the first subparameter accepts only the value 0, the second accepts any value from 1 through 3 inclusive, and the third subparameter accepts any of the values 0, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, or 12. + +## 5.8 Manufacturer-specific characteristics + +This Recommendation describes characteristics universal to a large installed base of DCEs. Most DCEs implement a number of extensions and behavioural differences beyond the descriptions in this Recommendation. The following subclauses mention a few specific and well-known examples of areas in which these extensions and behavioural differences exist. This is not intended to be a comprehensive list; extensions and differences do exist in other areas. This Recommendation is not intended to preclude or limit extensions in these or other areas. + +Equipment that implements non-standard commands, values, features, or behaviours, such as described in the following subclauses, shall be capable of being configured, by one or more commands, parameters, or switches, so that the equipment will properly interwork with DTEs that implement only the mandatory provisions of this Recommendation. + +### 5.8.1 Extensions + +DCEs claiming compliance to this Recommendation often include extensions in a number of areas. This Recommendation does not preclude the use of these extensions; however, the definition of these is totally up to the manufacturer. Other Recommendations may call out extensions as well. Some areas in which extensions exist include: + +- 1) command characters and commands consisting of a prefix character followed by one or more characters (however, the "+" prefix is reserved for future use in this and other standards and should not be used for non-standard purposes); +- 2) command numbers (including additional numbers associated with commands defined in this Recommendation); +- 3) parameter values (including additional values associated with parameters defined in this Recommendation); +- 4) S-parameter numbers; +- 5) S-parameter values (including additional values associated with S-parameters defined in this Recommendation); +- 6) command line editing characters; +- 7) result codes; +- 8) dial string modifiers; +- 9) syntax extensions to the body of the command line; +- 10) information responses; +- 11) mechanisms to exit from online data state and return to command state or online command state (using, for example, particular sequences of characters, timing, or other techniques). + +### 5.8.2 Behavioural differences + +This Recommendation specifically and intentionally does not describe DCE behaviour in some situations. This is generally due to variations in existing implementations. DTEs must take into account the possibility of differences in the behaviour of various DCEs in particular situations. + +The following are some examples of areas in which differences are known to exist. This is not intended to be a comprehensive list; behaviour differences exist in other areas as well: + +- 1) handling of unsolicited result codes while a command line is being entered (may be sent, suppressed, deferred, etc.); +- 2) answering of incoming calls while a command line is being entered (may occur, be deferred, etc.); +- 3) handling of loss of carrier during online command state [may be reported immediately (and data rate may vary), may be deferred until attempted re-entry into online data state, etc.]; +- 4) handling of undefined command numbers, and S-parameters values (may result in an **ERROR**, clamping of value to the valid range, retention of previous value, etc.); +- 5) execution time of actions (for example, **Z** command); +- 6) handling of variations in command line format and editing (for example: "**AT**" in mixed case; length of command line buffer; command line too long; whether or not space characters and control characters are stored in the command buffer; whether or not unrecognized control characters are echoed; echoing of other characters prior to receipt of the "**AT**" prefix; disposition of command lines in which the DTE changed the rate, format, or parity; etc.); +- 7) displaying of S-parameter values which cannot be expressed as three decimal digits; +- 8) states of connection establishment (e.g., handshaking) in which attempts to abort a command by transmission of a character to the DCE may not be recognized; +- 9) handling of additional characters that appear on the same command line after a semicolon that terminates a dial string (see 6.1.1); i.e., whether the additional characters are ignored or processed as commands; +- 10) carry-over of the effect of **P** and **T** dial modifiers from one dial string to the next. + +# 6 Functions + +The following descriptions of DCE functions and associated commands include information on both mandatory and optional capabilities. All mandatory commands, parameters, and responses shall be implemented in devices claiming conformance to this Recommendation. If an optional capability is implemented in a DCE, the associated command(s), parameter(s), and response(s) defined in this Recommendation shall be implemented. + +For simplicity, the following descriptions use a particular syntax; alternatives may be used when available. For example: + +- 1) Result codes are described in terms of their alphabetic format, except in situations where the setting of a parameter directly affects the format (e.g., **V** and **Q** commands). The actual result code issued would depend on the setting of parameters that affect result code formats. +- 2) The description of the **OK** result code for each command does not mention the fact that the result code will be deferred if any further commands appear on the same command line (see 5.4). + +Default values that are specified for some commands have been selected to provide proper operation of the DCE in its initial state. Implementation of the specified defaults is desirable but not mandatory, with the exception of **S3** (which has a mandatory default value of 13). Default values for all parameters supported shall be specified by the manufacturer. + +Some DCE functions and associated commands may be subject to national regulations. The manner of handling such restrictions (e.g., elimination of commands, restriction on ranges of accepted values, handling of values outside acceptable ranges, etc.) shall be determined by the manufacturer. + +Table I.2 lists all commands contained in the Recommendation, sorted alphabetically. + +## 6.1 Generic DCE control + +### 6.1.1 Reset to default configuration + +#### *Syntax* + +**Z**[] + +#### *Description* + +This command instructs the DCE to set all parameters to their factory defaults as specified by the manufacturer. This may include taking into consideration the settings of hardware configuration switches or non-volatile parameter storage (if implemented). If the DCE is connected to the line, it is disconnected from the line, terminating any call in progress. + +All of the functions of the command shall be completed before the DCE issues the result code. The DTE should not include additional commands on the same command line after the **Z** command because such commands may be ignored. + +NOTE – Because this command may take into consideration the settings of switches and non-volatile parameter storage, it does not necessarily return the DCE to a "known state". In particular, the DCE may, as a result of execution of this command, be placed in a state in which it appears to not respond to DTE commands, or respond in a completely different format than was being used prior to execution of the command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command may not be aborted. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** If is recognized. + +**ERROR** If is not recognized or supported. + +An **OK** result code for this command is issued using the same rate, parity, and word format as the DTE command line containing the command, but using the new values for parameters that affect the format of result codes (e.g., **Q**, **V**, **S3**, **S4**). + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time for this action varies widely depending on manufacturer implementation. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. Interpretation of is optional and manufacturer-specific. + +### 6.1.2 Set to factory-defined configuration + +#### *Syntax* + +**&F**[] + +#### *Description* + +This command instructs the DCE to set all parameters to default values specified by the manufacturer, which may take into consideration hardware configuration switches and other manufacturer-defined criteria. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command may not be aborted. + +#### *Defined values* + +- 0** Set parameters to factory defaults. +- (other)** Reserved for manufacturer proprietary use. + +#### *Result codes* + +- OK** If value is valid. +- ERROR** If value is not recognized or not supported. + +An **OK** result code for this command is issued using the same rate, parity, and word format as the DTE command line containing the command, but using the factory-defined values for other parameters that affect the format of result codes (e.g., **Q**, **V**, **S3**, **S4**) and dependent upon other commands that may follow on the same command line. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time for this action varies widely depending on manufacturer implementation. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. If the value specified is not recognized or implemented, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### **6.1.3 Request identification information** + +#### *Syntax* + +**I[]** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, followed by a final result code. **** may optionally be used to select from among multiple types of identifying information, specified by the manufacturer. + +NOTE – The responses to this command may not be reliably used to determine the DCE manufacturer, revision level, feature set, or other information, and should not be relied upon for software operation. In particular, expecting a specific numeric response to an **I0** command to indicate which other features and commands are implemented in a DCE dooms software to certain failure, since there are widespread differences in manufacturer implementation among devices that may, coincidentally, respond with identical values to this command. Software implementors should use **I** commands with extreme caution, since the amount of data returned by particular implementations may vary widely from a few bytes to several thousand bytes or more, and should be prepared to encounter **ERROR** responses if the value is not recognized. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not ordinarily abortable, but may be so in some implementations. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is optional. + +### **6.1.4 Request manufacturer identification (+GMI)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GMI** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the manufacturer. Typically, the text will consist of a single line containing the name of the manufacturer, but manufacturers may choose to provide more information if desired (e.g., address, telephone number for customer service, etc.). + +The total number of characters, including line terminators, in the information text returned in response to this command shall not exceed 2048 characters. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** In all cases. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. + +### **6.1.5 Request model identification (+GMM)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GMM** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the specific model of device. Typically, the text will consist of a single line containing the name of the product, but manufacturers may choose to provide any information desired. + +The total number of characters, including line terminators, in the information text returned in response to this command shall not exceed 2048 characters. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** In all cases. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. + +### **6.1.6 Request revision identification (+GMR)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GMR** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the version, revision level or date, or other pertinent information of the device. Typically, the text will consist of a single line containing the version of the product, but manufacturers may choose to provide any information desired. + +The total number of characters, including line terminators, in the information text returned in response to this command shall not exceed 2048 characters. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** In all cases. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. + +### **6.1.7 Request product serial number identification (+GSN)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GSN** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the individual device. Typically, the text will consist of a single line containing a manufacturer determined alpha-numeric string, but manufacturers may choose to provide any information desired. + +The total number of characters, including line terminators, in the information text returned in response to this command shall not exceed 2048 characters. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** In all cases. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is optional. + +### **6.1.8 Request global object identification (+GOI)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GOI** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text, determined by the manufacturer, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the device, based on the ISO system for registering unique object identifiers. Typically, the text will consist of a single line containing numeric strings delimited by period characters. + +The general format of object identifiers is defined in Annex D/X.680, the encoding rules are defined in Annex C/X.680. + +The total number of characters, including line terminators, in the information text returned in response to this command shall not exceed 2048 characters. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** In all cases. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time is dependent on the time required to transmit the information to the DTE. The DTE should not assume the amount of time required to execute this command, but await a result code or other positive indication from the DCE that it is ready to accept a command. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is optional. + +### **6.1.9 Request complete capabilities list (+GCAP)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+GCAP** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text in a specific format. The content is a list of additional capabilities command +s, which is intended to permit the user of the DCE to identify the overall capabilities of the DCE. + +In particular, if the DCE implements a particular DCE control standard that uses Extended Syntax Commands, and if that DCE control standard includes command(s) that indicate general capabilities, the +(s) of those commands shall be reported to the DCE in response to a +GCAP command. See Table 2. + +**Table 2/V.250 – Examples of required +GCAP responses** + +| +GCAP response | DCE control standard | Description | +|-----------------------|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| +FCLASS | T.class1, +F
or T.class2, +F | Class 1 Facsimile DCE Control
Class 2 Facsimile DCE Control | +| +MS | +M commands | Modulation Control:
+MS and +MR commands | +| +MV18S | +MV18 commands | V.18 Modulation Control:
+MV18S and +MV18R | +| +ES | +E commands | Error Control:
+ES, +EB, +ER, +EFCS, +ETBM | +| +DS | +D commands | Data Compression:
+DS and +DR | + +For example, a data modem that supported all capabilities described in this Recommendation may report: + +**+GCAP: +MS, +ES, +DS, +MV18S** + +If that example DCE implemented other commands, they shall also be included. If that DCE implemented stubs (e.g., +FCLASS=0 only), it may report +FCLASS as part of its +GCAP response. + +The response is not specifically limited as to number of lines of text. Note that the information text shall not contain the sequence "0 " (3/0, 0/13) or "OK" (4/15, 4/11, 0/13), so that DTE can avoid false detection of the end of this information text. + +It is not necessary for a DTE to inquire of the +GCAP where the application is specific to a technology, such as facsimile where the +FCLASS command would be sufficient to determine capabilities. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command is not abortable. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. The response might be null if the DCE lacks specific capabilities commands. A DTE that is aware of a specific DCEs capabilities might elect not to use the +GCAP command. + +### **6.1.10 Country of installation (+GCI)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+GCI=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended syntax command is used to indicate and select the country of installation for the DCE. If implemented, the DCE shall use this parameter to select the settings for any operational parameters that need to be adjusted for national regulations or telephone networks. DTE may use this value to determine country-specific functions. + +If a DCE supports legal connection in only one country, then that DCE shall report only the T.35 country code for that country in response to a read or test command, and accept only that value for a write command. + +#### *Defined values* + +ITU-T Rec. T.35 defines 8-bit country codes. Annex A/T.35 lists country codes, with bits 8-1 and the country names. For use with the +GCI parameter, the value shall be the hexadecimal equivalent of the T.35 code, with bit 8 treated as the most significant bit and bit 1 treated as the least significant bit. Example values: 00 for Japan; 0A for Austria; 64 for Lebanon; C4 for Zimbabwe. + +#### *Recommended default* + +If the DCE is specified for use in only one country, that country code shall be the default. Otherwise, the recommended default is the expected country of sale or first installation. DCE may use hardware means to select the country of installation, in which case the DCE shall use that to determine the default value. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+GCI?** + +The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the hexadecimal numeric value corresponding to the current setting: + +**+GCI:** + +e.g., +GCI:3D indicates that the DCE is set for France. + +*Test syntax* + +**+GCI=?** + +The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the list of numerical values corresponding to the country or countries that are supported: + +**+GCI:( [, [,...]])** + +e.g., +GCI:(20,73,B5) indicates that the DCE can be set for Canada, Mexico or the United States. + +*Implementation* + +This command shall be implemented in DCE that can be installed in more than one country, and which need to adjust operating parameters in order to function correctly in those countries. + +## **6.2 DTE-DCE interface commands** + +The parameters defined in this clause control the operation of the interface between the DTE and DCE. + +### **6.2.1 Command line termination character** + +*Parameter* + +**S3** + +*Description* + +This S-parameter represents the decimal IA5 value of the character recognized by the DCE from the DTE to terminate an incoming command line. It is also generated by the DCE as part of the header, trailer, and terminator for result codes and information text, along with the **S4** parameter (see the description of the **V** parameter for usage). + +The previous value of **S3** is used to determine the command line termination character for entry of the command line containing the **S3** setting command. However, the result code issued shall use the value of **S3** as set during the processing of the command line. For example, if **S3** was previously set to 13 and the command line "**ATS3=30**" is issued, the command line shall be terminated with a CR character (IA5 0/13), but the result code issued will use the character with the ordinal value 30 (IA5 2/14) in place of the CR. + +*Defined values* + +**0 to 127** Set command line termination character to this value. + +*Mandatory default setting* + +**13** Carriage return character (CR, IA5 0/13). + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### **6.2.2 Response formatting character** + +*Parameter* + +**S4** + +*Description* + +This S-parameter represents the decimal IA5 value of the character generated by the DCE as part of the header, trailer, and terminator for result codes and information text, along with the **S3** parameter (see the description of the **V** parameter for usage). + +If the value of **S4** is changed in a command line, the result code issued in response to that command line will use the new value of **S4**. + +#### *Defined values* + +**0 to 127** Set response formatting character to this value. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**10** Line feed character (LF, IA5 0/10). + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### **6.2.3 Command line editing character** + +#### *Parameter* + +**S5** + +#### *Description* + +This S-parameter represents the decimal IA5 value of the character recognized by the DCE as a request to delete from the command line the immediately preceding character (see 5.2.2). + +#### *Defined values* + +**0 to 127** Set command line editing character to this value. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**8** Backspace character (BS, IA5 0/8). + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### **6.2.4 Command echo** + +#### *Parameter* + +**E[]** + +#### *Description* + +The setting of this parameter determines whether or not the DCE echoes characters received from the DTE during command state and online command state (see 5.2.3). + +#### *Defined values* + +**0** DCE does not echo characters during command state and online command state. + +**1** DCE echoes characters during command state and online command state. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**1** DCE echoes characters during command state and online command state. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### 6.2.5 Result code suppression + +#### Parameter + +**Q[]** + +#### Description + +The setting of this parameter determines whether or not the DCE transmits result codes to the DTE. When result codes are being suppressed, no portion of any intermediate, final, or unsolicited result code – header, result text, line terminator, or trailer – is transmitted. Information text transmitted in response to commands is not affected by the setting of this parameter. + +#### Defined values + +- 0** DCE transmits result codes. +- 1** Result codes are suppressed and not transmitted. + +#### Recommended default setting + +- 0** DCE transmits result codes. + +#### Result codes + +- OK** If value is **0**. +- (none)** If value is **1** (because result codes are suppressed). +- ERROR** For unsupported values (if previous value was **Q0**). +- (none)** For unsupported values (if previous value was **Q1**). + +#### Implementation + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### 6.2.6 DCE response format + +#### Parameter + +**V[]** + +#### Description + +The setting of this parameter determines the contents of the header and trailer transmitted with result codes and information responses. It also determines whether result codes are transmitted in a numeric form or an alphabetic (or "verbose") form. The text portion of information responses is not affected by this setting. + +Table 3 shows the effect of the setting of this parameter on the format of information text and result codes. All references to **** mean "the character with the ordinal value specified in parameter **S3**"; all references to **** likewise mean "the character with the ordinal value specified in parameter **S4**". See Table 3. + +**Table 3/V.250 – Effect of V parameter on response formats** + +| | V0 | V1 | +|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Information responses | <text><cr><lf> | <cr><lf>
<text><cr><lf> | +| Result codes | <numeric code><cr> | <cr><lf>
<verbose code><cr><lf> | + +#### *Defined values* + +- 0** DCE transmits limited headers and trailers and numeric text. +- 1** DCE transmits full headers and trailers and verbose response text. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +- 1** DCE transmits full headers and trailers and verbose response text. + +#### *Result codes* + +- 0** If value is **0** (because numeric response text is being used). +- OK** If value is **1**. +- 4** For unsupported values (if previous value was **V0**). +- ERROR** For unsupported values (if previous value was **V1**). + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### **6.2.7 Result code selection and call progress monitoring control** + +#### *Parameter* + +**X[]** + +#### *Description* + +The setting of this parameter determines whether or not the DCE transmits particular result codes to the DTE. It also controls whether or not the DCE verifies the presence of a dial tone when it first goes off-hook to begin dialling, and whether or not engaged tone (busy signal) detection is enabled. However, this setting has no effect on the operation of the **W** dial modifier, which always checks for a dial tone regardless of this setting, nor on the busy signal detection capability of the **W** and **@** dial modifiers. See Table 4. + +**Table 4/V.250 – Defined values for X parameter** + +| X<value> | Description | +|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | CONNECT result code is given upon entering online data state. Dial tone and busy detection are disabled. | +| 1 | CONNECT result code is given upon entering online data state. Dial tone and busy detection are disabled. | +| 2 | CONNECT result code is given upon entering online data state. Dial tone detection is enabled, and busy detection is disabled. | +| 3 | CONNECT result code is given upon entering online data state. Dial tone detection is disabled, and busy detection is enabled. | +| 4 | CONNECT result code is given upon entering online data state. Dial tone and busy detection are both enabled. | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the specified value is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### 6.2.8 Circuit 109 (Received line signal detector) behaviour + +#### *Parameter* + +**&C[]** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter determines how the state of circuit 109 relates to the detection of received line signal from the distant end. Changing the parameter will take effect immediately in both the command and online command states. + +In **&C1** mode of operation, circuit 109 is not turned off until all data previously received from the remote DCE is delivered to the local DTE. However, such buffered data shall be discarded and circuit 109 turned off if the DTE turns off circuit 108 (if **&D1** or **&D2** is set). + +#### *Defined values* + +- 0** The DCE always presents the ON condition on circuit 109. +- 1** Circuit 109 changes in accordance with the underlying DCE, which may include functions other than the physical layer functions (e.g., ITU-T Recs V.42, V.110, V.120 and V.13). + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +- 1** Circuit 109 changes in accordance with the underlying DCE, which may include functions other than the physical layer functions (e.g., ITU-T Recs V.42, V.110, V.120 and V.13). + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the value specified is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. + +### 6.2.9 Circuit 108 (Data terminal ready) behaviour + +#### *Parameter* + +**&D[]** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter determines how the DCE responds when circuit 108/2 is changed from the ON to the OFF condition during online data state. + +#### *Defined values* + +- 0** DCE ignores circuit 108/2. +- 1** Upon an on-to-off transition of circuit 108/2, the DCE enters online command state and issues an OK result code; the call remains connected. +- 2** Upon an on-to-off transition of circuit 108/2, the DCE instructs the underlying DCE to perform an orderly cleardown of the call. The disposition of any data in the DCE pending transmission to the remote DCE is controlled by the +ETBM parameter (see 6.5.6) if implemented; otherwise, this data is sent before the call is cleared, unless the remote DCE clears the call first (in which case pending data is discarded). The DCE disconnects from the line. Automatic answer is disabled while circuit 108/2 remains off. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. If the value specified is not recognized, an **ERROR** result code is issued. Implementation of defined values 0 and 2 is mandatory; implementation of defined value 1 is optional. + +### 6.2.10 Fixed DTE rate (+IPR) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+IPR=** + +#### *Description* + +This numeric extended-format parameter specifies the data rate at which the DCE will accept commands, in addition to 1200 bit/s or 9600 bit/s (as required in 4.3). It may be used to select operation at rates at which the DCE is not capable of automatically detecting the data rate being used by the DTE. Specifying a value of 0 disables the function and allows operation only at rates automatically detectable by the DCE. The specified rate takes effect following the issuance of any result code(s) associated with the current command line. + +The specified does not apply in online data state if Direct mode of operation is selected. + +#### *Defined values* + +The value specified shall be the rate in bits per second at which the DTE-DCE interface should operate, e.g., "19 200" or "115 200". The rates supported by a particular DCE are manufacturer-specific; however, the +IPR parameter should permit the setting of any rate supported by the DCE during online operation. Rates which include a non-integral number of bits per second should be truncated to the next lower integer (e.g., 134.5 bit/s should be specified as 134; 45.45 bit/s should be specified as 45). If unspecified or set to 0, automatic detection is selected for the range determined as in 4.3 and the DCE manufacturer, and the character format is also forced to autodetect, +ICF=0 (see 6.2.11). + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +It is recommended that the default for this parameter be the automatic detection setting (0), which facilitates initial DTE-DCE communications. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+IPR?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+IPR:** + +e.g., +IPR:0 if set for automatic rate detection. + +e.g., +IPR:9600 if set to 9600 bit/s. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+IPR=?** + +The DCE shall transmit one or two strings of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+IPR:(list of supported autodetectable values)[,(list of fixed-only values)]** + +e.g., +IPR:(0,300,1200,2400,4800,9600),(19200,38400,57600) + +if the DCE can autodetect up to 9600 bit/s and can support three additional higher fixed rates. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is optional. If the rate specified is not supported by the DCE, an **ERROR** result code shall be returned. + +### 6.2.11 DTE-DCE character framing (+ICF) + +#### Parameter + +**+ICF**=[[,]] + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to determine the local serial port start-stop (asynchronous) character framing that the DCE shall use while accepting DTE commands and while transmitting information text and result code, if this is not automatically determined; +IPR=0 forces +ICF=0 (see +IPR, 6.2.10). Note that the definition of fixed character format for online data state is for further study. + +**** determines the number of bits in the data bits, the presence of a parity bit, and the number of stop bits in the start-stop frame. + +NOTE – The semantics of this command are derived from ITU-T Rec. V.58. + +**** determines how the parity bit is generated and checked, if present. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 5. + +**Table 5/V.250 – Character format values** + +| <format> | Valid numeric values | +|-----------------------|-------------------------------| +| 0 | auto detect | +| 1 | 8 Data; 2 Stop | +| 2 | 8 Data; 1 Parity; 1 Stop | +| 3 | 8 Data; 1 Stop | +| 4 | 7 Data; 2 Stop | +| 5 | 7 Data; 1 Parity; 1 Stop | +| 6 | 7 Data; 1 Stop | +| <parity> | Defined numeric values | +| 0 | Odd | +| 1 | Even | +| 2 | Mark | +| 3 | Space | + +#### Recommended default setting + +For : **3** + +For : **3** + +##### Read syntax + +**+ICF?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ICF:,** + +e.g., +ICF:3,3 for the recommended defaults. + +##### Test syntax + +###### **+ICF=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +###### **+ICF:(list of supported values),(list of supported values)** + +e.g., +ICF:(0-6),(0-3) for all defined values. + +#### Implementation + +Implementation of this parameter is optional. If the format specified is not supported by the DCE, an **ERROR** result code shall be returned. + +### **6.2.12 DTE-DCE local flow control (+IFC)** + +#### Parameter + +##### **+IFC=[ [,]]** + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to control the operation of local flow control between the DTE and DCE during the data state when V.42 error control is being used, or when fallback to non-error control mode is specified to include buffering and flow control. It accepts two numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which specifies the method to be used by the DTE to control the flow of received data from the DCE; and +- ****, which specifies the method to be used by the DCE to control the flow of transmitted data from the DTE. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 6. + +**Table 6/V.250 – and values** + +| <DCE_by_DTE> | Description | +|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | None | +| 1 | DC1/DC3 on circuit 103; do not pass DC1/DC3 characters to the remote DCE | +| 2 | Circuit 133 (Ready for Receiving) | +| 3 | DC1/DC3 on circuit 103 with DC1/DC3 characters being passed through to the remote DCE in addition to being acted upon for local flow control | +| 4 to 127 | Reserved for future standardization | +| Other | Reserved for manufacturer-specific use | +| <DTE_by_DCE> | Description | +| 0 | None | +| 1 | DC1/DC3 on circuit 104 | +| 2 | Circuit 106 (Clear to Send/Ready for Sending) | +| 3 to 127 | Reserved for future standardization | +| Other | Reserved for manufacturer-specific use | +| NOTE – DC1 is IA5 1/1; DC3 is IA5 1/3. | | + +#### *Recommended default settings* + +For :           **2** + +For :           **2** + +##### *Read syntax* + +###### **+IFC?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+IFC:,** + +e.g., +IFC:2,2 for the recommended defaults. + +##### *Test syntax* + +##### **+IFC=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+IFC:(list of supported values),(list of supported values)** + +e.g., +IFC:(0-3),(0-2) for all defined values. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 error control or Buffered mode is provided in the DCE; otherwise it is optional. DCEs which do not implement circuit 106 and/or circuit 133 do not need to support the value of 2 for the corresponding subparameter. + +### **6.2.13 DTE-DCE local rate reporting (+ILRR)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+ILRR=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls whether or not the extended-format "+ILRR:" information text is transmitted from the DCE to the DTE. The reported shall represent the current (negotiated or renegotiated) DTE-DCE rate. If enabled, the intermediate result code is transmitted after any modulation, error control or data compression reports are transmitted, and before any final result code (e.g., CONNECT) is transmitted. The is applied after the final result code is transmitted. + +The DTE-DCE port rate will change only if neither buffered mode nor error-controlled means are enabled (+ES=x,0) and if the negotiated carrier rate (+MRR) does not match the current DTE-DCE port rate (set by +IPR command or autodetected from the previous command line). + +The format of this intermediate result code is: + +**+ILRR: [,]** e.g., +ILRR: 19 200 + +**** values are decimal values. The optional **** value reports the rate on circuit 104 (RXD), if it is different from the rate on circuit 103 (TXD). + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 7. + +**Table 7/V.250 – Local port rate reporting values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disables reporting of local port rate (+ILRR: is not transmitted) | +| 1 | Enables reporting of local port rate (+ILRR: is transmitted) | + +*Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+ILRR?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ILRR:** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + ++ILRR:0 + +*Test syntax* + +**+ILRR=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ILRR:(list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + ++ILRR:(0,1) + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter and the associated intermediate result codes is mandatory for V-series data modems conforming to this Recommendation. + +### **6.2.14 Select Sync Transmit Clock Source (+ICLOK)** + +*Parameter* + +**+ICLOK=** + +*Description* + +This command determines how the DTE transmit clock is generated while the DCE is in the synchronous mode. + +*Values* + +- 0** The DCE generates transmit clock and applies it to V.24 circuit 114. +- 1** The DCE accepts transmit clock on V.24 circuit 113 and applies it to circuit 114. +- 2** The DCE derives transmit clock from the receive clock on V.24 circuit 115 and applies it to circuit 114. + +*Default value* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+ICLOK?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+ICLOCK: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+ICLOCK=?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+ICLOCK: (range of supported values)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +### **6.2.15 Select Long Space Disconnect Option (+ILSD)** + +*Parameter* + +**+ILSD=** + +*Description* + +This command determines if the DCE shall disconnect a call upon receiving a long space (1.6-s break) signal from the distant end and if the DCE shall send a long space to cause a disconnect. + +If enabled, the modem shall send a 4-s break (continuous space) before performing signal converter clear-down (if any) and before going on-hook, when instructed to hang up by the DTE. + +Long Space Disconnect is applicable in Direct mode and Buffered mode. + +*Values* + +**0** Disable long space disconnect + +**1** Enable long space disconnect + +*Default value* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+ILSD?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+ILSD: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+ILSD=?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+ILSD: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +### **6.2.16 Select Data Set Ready Option (+IDSR)** + +*Parameter* + +**+IDSR=** + +*Description* + +This parameter determines how V.24 circuit 107 (Data Set Ready, DSR) shall behave. + +#### *Values* + +- 0** DSR is always ON. +- 1** DSR functions as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.24 and the relevant V-series Recommendation for the signal converter in use. +- 2** DSR is always ON except for 5 s after disconnect. + +##### *Default value* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+IDSR?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+IDSR: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+IDSR=?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+IDSR: (range of supported values)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Optional + +### **6.2.17 Select Synchronous Mode RTS Option (+IRTS)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+IRTS=[,]** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter configures the operation of V.24 circuit 105 (Request to Send, RTS) and circuit 106 (Ready for Sending, or CTS), while the DCE is operating in Synchronous Mode. In any operating mode where the DTE interface is asynchronous (i.e., Direct, Buffered, Error Control, or Synchronous Access Modes) the setting of this parameter is ignored. In this case, circuit 105 is assumed ON, and the actual state of this circuit, if present, is ignored. The operation of circuit 106 in this case is determined by the +IFC parameter. + +NOTE – In many DCE, circuits 105 and 133 share the same signal lead. In those cases, the setting of the +IFC parameter determines which circuit is in effect at the signal lead. + +#### *Values* + +- 0** While in online state, circuit 106 tracks circuit 105 according to the relevant V-series Recommendation for the modulation, with an additional delay equal to the value of , in units of 10 ms. +- 1** Circuit 106 is clamped ON, and circuit 105 is ignored. + +##### *Default value* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+IRTS?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+IRTS: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+IRTS=?** + +The DCE shall send a line of information text to the DTE: + +**+IRTS: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +## **6.3 Call control** + +This clause defines action commands and parameters used to make and maintain calls. It defines result codes generated in executions of these action commands. It also defines one unsolicited DCE result code, RING (see 6.3.4). + +### **6.3.1 Dial** + +*Syntax* + +**D[][:]** + +*Description* + +This command instructs the DCE to originate a call. This may include several steps, depending upon the DCE type, such as: connecting to the line (going off-hook), waiting for the network to indicate readiness to receive call addressing information (wait for dial tone), signalling call addressing information to the network (dialling the number), monitoring the line for call progress signals (e.g., busy), and instructing the underlying DCE to start the call origination procedure (modulation handshaking). + +All characters appearing on the same command line after the "**D**" are considered part of the call addressing information to be signalled to the network, or modifiers used to control the signalling process (collectively known as a "dial string"), up to a semicolon character (IA5 3/11) or the end of the command line. If the dial string is terminated by a semicolon, the DCE does not start the call origination procedure as defined for the underlying DCE, but instead returns to command state after completion of the signalling of call addressing information to the network. + +Any characters appearing in the dial string that the DCE does not recognize as a valid part of the call addressing information or as a valid modifier shall be ignored. This permits characters such as parentheses and hyphens to be included that are typically used in formatting of telephone numbers. + +NOTE 1 – The behaviour of the **D** command may be modified if DTE control of V.8 or V.8 *bis* is enabled; refer to Annex A in this case. + +*Abortability* + +The **D** command may be aborted in the manner described in 5.6.1. If the DCE is connected to the line, it disconnects from the line in an orderly manner as required by the state of the connection. Aborting the connection by reception of a character is generally possible at any time before the DCE enters online data state, but may not be possible during some states of connection establishment such as handshaking. The DCE shall issue a final result code; which result code to issue shall be determined by the manufacturer, and may depend upon the state of the connection at the time the character was received from the DTE. If a **CONNECT** or **CONNECT ** result code is received by the DTE, this indicates that the attempt to abort the command was not successful, possibly due to the state of connection establishment at the time the character was sent. See Table 8. + +**Table 8/V.250 – D command result codes** + +| Alphabetic
(ATV1)
| Numeric
(ATV0)
| Description | +|------------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| CONNECT | 1 | If connection is successfully established and X0 is selected. This result code is transmitted immediately before circuit 109 is turned on | +| CONNECT <text> | – | If connection is successfully established and Xn is selected where "n" is any value other than 0. This result code is transmitted immediately before circuit 109 is turned on. The contents of are manufacturer-specific, and may include indication of DTE interface speed, line speed, error control and data compression techniques in use, and other information | +| NO CARRIER | 3 | If a connection cannot be established, or was aborted by reception of an additional character from the DTE | +| ERROR | 4 | If issued while in online command state | +| BUSY | 7 | If busy signal detection is enabled or the W or @ dial modifier is used, and a busy signal is detected | +| NO ANSWER | 8 | If the @ dial modifier is used, and remote ringing followed by five seconds of silence is not detected before the expiration of the connection timer defined by S7 | +| NO DIALTONE | 6 | If dial tone detection is enabled or the W dial modifier is used, and no dial tone is detected within the associated timeout period | +| OK | 0 | If command is aborted by either reception of an additional character from the DTE or by the DTE turning off circuit 108 (if &D1 or &D2 is selected; see 6.2.9), or if the dial string is terminated by a semicolon character | + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time for this action varies widely depending on the call origination procedure of the underlying DCE and the time required to determine whether or not a connection is successfully established. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of the **D** command and all associated result codes is mandatory. The elements of the dial string are discussed in the following subclauses. + +The steps necessary for establishing a call are dependent upon the type of DCE in use and national requirements. + +NOTE 2 – Some applications, such as call-back security, may require a modem to originate a call using the frequencies normally reserved for an answering modem. No dial modifier is specified in this Recommendation for this purpose. However, it can be accomplished by terminating the **D** command with a semicolon, and following the semicolon with an **A** (Answer) command. + +#### **6.3.1.1 Dialling digits** + +##### *Syntax* + +A string of 0 or more of the characters: + +**"0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 \* # + A B C D"** + +##### *Description* + +For each digit, the DCE signals the digit to the network as part of the call addressing sequence. For GSTN applications, refer to ITU-T Rec. Q.23 and national regulations for information on signalling procedures. + +Optional dial modifiers and parameters can affect the signalling of call addressing information (for example, whether pulse or DTMF signalling is to be used in GSTN applications). + +##### *Implementation* + +The dialling digits **0** through **9** shall be implemented. If DTMF dialling is implemented, **\***, **#**, **A**, **B**, **C**, and **D** characters shall be implemented. If the DCE is designed to operate with network services that translate "+" to the international access code, then "+" shall be implemented. + +#### **6.3.1.2 Pause during dialling** + +##### *Syntax* + +",," (comma, IA5 2/12) + +##### *Description* + +In GSTN applications, causes a pause in the signalling of addressing information (dialling). The duration of the pause is specified by parameter **S8** (see 6.3.10). + +##### *Implementation* + +The comma dial modifier shall be implemented. + +#### **6.3.1.3 Select tone dialling (dial modifier)** + +##### *Syntax* + +**T** + +##### *Description* + +Causes subsequent dial digits to be signalled using DTMF. The effect of the **T** modifier may carry forward to subsequent **D** commands (i.e., once a **T** dial modifier is used, all subsequent dialling uses DTMF tones until a **P** dial modifier or command is issued); however, it is recommended that the DTE explicitly specify pulse or DTMF dialling with the appropriate dial modifier (**P** or **T**) at the beginning of each dial string. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is mandatory; however, if DTMF dialling is not implemented, this modifier will have no effect. + +#### **6.3.1.4 Select pulse dialling (dial modifier)** + +##### *Syntax* + +**P** + +##### *Description* + +Causes subsequent dial digits to be signalled using pulse dialling. The effect of the **P** modifier may carry forward to subsequent **D** commands (i.e., once a **P** dial modifier is used, all subsequent dialling uses pulse dialling until a **T** dial modifier or command is issued); however, it is recommended that the DTE explicitly specify pulse or DTMF dialling with the appropriate dial modifier (**P** or **T**) at the beginning of each dial string. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is mandatory; however, if pulse dialling is not implemented, this modifier will have no effect. + +#### **6.3.1.5 Register recall/hook flash** + +##### *Syntax* + +"!" (exclamation point, IA5 2/1) + +##### *Description* + +Causes the DCE to go on-hook for a specified period of time, and then return off-hook for at least a specified period of time before continuing with the remainder of the dial string. The specified period of time is normally one-half second, but may be governed by national regulations. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is mandatory in devices intended for operation on the GSTN. + +#### **6.3.1.6 Wait for dial tone** + +##### *Syntax* + +**W** + +##### *Description* + +Causes the DCE to listen for dial tone on the line. If a valid dial tone is detected, the DCE continues processing the remainder of the dial string. + +If the DCE decides to abort dialling because the dial tone does not occur within the connection timeout period specified by parameter **S7**, the **NO DIALTONE** or **NO CARRIER** result code is issued and the remainder of the command line is ignored. + +The DCE may, but is not required to, detect busy signal while listening for dial tone; this capability may be conditioned upon the setting of the **X** command. The **BUSY** or **NO CARRIER** result codes may be issued if the DCE detects a busy signal while listening for dial tone; in this event, the remainder of the command line is ignored. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is mandatory for devices intended for operation on the GSTN. The amount of time that dial tone must be present to be considered "detected" may be governed by national regulations, and in the absence of such regulations is manufacturer-specific. + +#### **6.3.1.7 Wait for quiet answer** + +##### *Syntax* + +@ (at sign, IA5 4/0) + +##### *Description* + +Causes the DCE to listen for remote ringing, followed by five seconds of silence on the line. If silence is detected for this period, the DCE continues processing the remainder of the dial string. + +If the DCE decides to abort dialling because the required period of silence does not occur within the timeout period specified by parameter **S7**, the **NO ANSWER** or **NO CARRIER** result code is issued and the remainder of the command line is ignored. + +The DCE may, but is not required to, detect busy signal while listening for silence; this capability may be conditioned upon the setting of the **X** command. The **BUSY** or **NO CARRIER** result codes + +may be issued if the DCE detects a busy signal while listening for silence; in this event, the remainder of the command line is ignored. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is mandatory for devices intended for operation on the GSTN. The duration of the period of silence for which the DCE listens may be governed by national regulations. + +#### **6.3.1.8 Invoke stored string** + +##### *Syntax* + +**S=** + +##### *Description* + +Causes the string stored at by the +ASTO command to be processed. + +The S is followed by "=" where is in the range 0 to one (less than the number of storage locations). The last digit of is recognized by the presence of a non-digit character or the end of the command line. Any characters on the command line after the last digit of shall be ignored. Other (non-stored) dial string characters may precede the S in the command line. + +An out of range value for shall cause an **ERROR** result code. If the character immediately following the S is not an "=" or there is no digit following the "=", then all characters after the S are ignored, and stored number 0 is dialled. + +##### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this dial modifier is optional. + +### **6.3.2 Select tone dialling (command)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**T** + +#### *Description* + +Causes subsequent **D** commands to assume that DTMF dialling is to be used unless otherwise specified. Once a **T** command is used, all subsequent dialling uses DTMF tones until a **P** command or dial modifier is issued. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory; however, if DTMF dialling is not implemented, this command will have no effect. + +### **6.3.3 Select pulse dialling (command)** + +#### *Syntax* + +**P** + +#### *Description* + +Causes subsequent **D** commands to assume that pulse dialling is to be used unless otherwise specified. Once a **P** command is used, all subsequent dialling uses pulse dialling until a **T** command or dial modifier is issued. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory; however, if pulse dialling is not implemented, this modifier will have no effect. + +### **6.3.4 Incoming call indication** + +The Incoming Call Indication is an unsolicited result code. + +#### *Syntax* + +**RING**        Alphabetic form (ATV1). + +**2**            Numeric form (ATV0). + +#### *Description* + +This result code is issued by the DCE to report an incoming call to the DTE. Interpretation of indications from the network to determine what constitutes a "ring" is defined by national regulations. This result code should be repeated each time the network repeats the incoming call indication. + +The transmitting of **RING** result codes from the DCE to the DTE may be suppressed during command entry and execution (see 5.8.2). Circuit 125, if provided, may be unaffected by the status of command entry and execution and continue to indicate incoming calls even though transmitting of **RING** result codes is suppressed. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this result code is mandatory. + +### **6.3.5 Answer** + +#### *Syntax* + +**A** + +#### *Description* + +This command instructs the DCE to immediately connect to the line and start the answer sequence as specified for the underlying DCE. + +Any additional commands that appear after **A** on the same command line are ignored. + +NOTE – The behaviour of the **A** command may be modified if DTE control of V.8 or V.8 *bis* is enabled; refer to Annex A in this case. + +#### *Abortability* + +The **A** command may be aborted in the manner described in 5.6.1. If the DCE is connected to the line, it disconnects from the line in an orderly manner as required by the state of the connection. Aborting the connection by reception of a character is generally possible at any time before the DCE enters online data state, but may not be possible during some states of connection establishment, such as handshaking. The DCE shall issue a final result code; which result code to issue shall be determined by the manufacturer, and may depend upon the state of the connection at the time the character was received from the DTE. If a **CONNECT** or **CONNECT ** result code is received by the DTE, this indicates that the attempt to abort the command was not successful, possibly due to the state of connection establishment at the time the character was sent. See Table 9. + +**Table 9/V.250 – A command result codes** + +| Alphabetic
(ATV1) | Numeric
(ATV0) | Description | +|-----------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| CONNECT | 1 | If connection is successfully established and X0 is selected. This result code is transmitted immediately before circuit 109 is turned on | +| CONNECT <text> | – | If connection is successfully established and Xn is selected where "n" is any value other than 0. This result code is transmitted immediately before circuit 109 is turned on. The contents of <text> are manufacturer-specific, and may include indication of DTE interface speed, line speed, error control and data compression techniques in use, and other information | +| NO CARRIER | 3 | If a connection cannot be established, or was aborted by reception of an additional character from the DTE | +| ERROR | 4 | If issued while in online command state | +| OK | 0 | If command is aborted by either reception of an additional character from the DTE or by the DTE turning off circuit 108 (if &D1 or &D2 is selected; see 6.2.9), or if the dial string is terminated by a semicolon character | + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time for this action varies widely depending on the answer sequence of the underlying DCE and the time required to determine whether or not a connection is successfully established. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. + +### **6.3.6 Hook control** + +#### *Syntax* + +**H[]** + +#### *Description* + +This command instructs the DCE to disconnect from the line, terminating any call in progress. All of the functions of the command shall be completed before the DCE issues any result code. + +NOTE – When used with modem-on-hold procedures per V.92, the call may be terminated without disconnecting from the line. Other V.250 commands such as AT+PMHF may then be used to cause the PSTN to switch to another line for placing another outgoing call or accepting another incoming call. + +#### *Abortability* + +This action may not be aborted. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** Disconnect from line and terminate call. + +#### *Result codes* + +**OK** The result code is issued after circuit 109 is turned off, if it was previously on. + +**ERROR** If is not recognized or supported. + +#### *Execution time* + +Execution time for this action varies widely depending on the call termination procedure of the underlying DCE and manufacturers' implementation. The DTE should wait for the result code before proceeding with subsequent commands. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. If the value specified is not recognized or implemented, an **ERROR** result code shall be generated. + +### **6.3.7 Return to online data state** + +#### *Syntax* + +**O[]** + +#### *Description* + +Causes the DCE to return to online data state and issue a **CONNECT** or **CONNECT ** result code. + +#### *Abortability* + +This command may not be aborted. + +#### *Defined values* + +**0** Return to online data state from online command state. Also used to retrain after a modem-on-hold transaction or to reconnect to a modem that has been placed in anon-hold state per V.92. + +**(other)** Reserved for manufacturer proprietary use. + +#### *Result codes* + +See Table 10. + +**Table 10/V.250 – O command result codes** + +| | | +|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| CONNECT | If connection is successfully resumed and X0 is selected | +| CONNECT <text> | If connection is successfully resumed and Xn is selected where "n" is any value other than 0 | +| NO CARRIER | If connection is not successfully resumed | +| ERROR | If is not recognized or supported | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory. + +### **6.3.8 Automatic answer** + +#### *Parameter* + +**S0** + +#### *Description* + +This S-parameter controls the automatic answering feature of the DCE. If set to 0, automatic answering is disabled. If set to a non-zero value, the DCE shall cause the DCE to answer when the incoming call indication (ring) has occurred the number of times indicated by the value (see 6.1.2). For example, in GSTN modem applications, setting this parameter to 1 will cause the modem to answer an incoming call on the first ring. + +#### *Defined values* + +- 0** Automatic answering is disabled. +**1 to 255** Enable automatic answering on the ring number specified. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +- 0** Automatic answering is disabled. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. The value 0 shall be supported (for interworking with DTEs that wish to disable automatic answering); values other than 0 may be supported. National regulations may limit the allowable non-zero values. + +### **6.3.9 Pause before blind dialling** + +#### *Parameter* + +**S6** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter specifies the amount of time, in seconds, that the DCE shall wait between connecting to the line and signalling call addressing information to network (dialling), when dial tone detection is not implemented or enabled. + +#### *Defined values* + +- 2 to 10** Number of seconds to wait before blind dialling. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +- 2** Wait two seconds before blind dialling. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. However, the effect of settings may be governed by national regulations (some countries may not permit blind dialling, or place a limit on the maximum pause before dialling begins). + +### **6.3.10 Connection completion timeout** + +#### *Parameter* + +**S7** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter specifies the amount of time, in seconds, that the DCE shall allow between either answering a call (automatically or by the **A** command) or completion of signalling of call addressing information to network (dialling), and establishment of a connection with the remote DCE. If no connection is established during this time, the DCE disconnects from the line and returns a result code indicating the cause of the disconnection (see the descriptions of the **A** and **D** commands and related dial modifiers for more information). + +#### *Defined values* + +- 1 to 255** Number of seconds in which connection must be established or call will be disconnected. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. The effect of settings may be governed by national regulations. + +### 6.3.11 Comma dial modifier time + +*Parameter* + +**S8** + +*Description* + +This parameter specifies the amount of time, in seconds, that the DCE shall pause, during signalling of call addressing information to the network (dialling), when a "," (comma) dial modifier is encountered in a dial string. + +*Defined values* + +**0** DCE does not pause when "," encountered in dial string. + +**1 to 255** Number of seconds to pause. + +*Recommended default setting* + +**2** DCE pauses two seconds when "," is encountered. + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. The effect of settings may be governed by national regulations. + +### 6.3.12 Automatic disconnect delay + +*Parameter* + +**S10** + +*Description* + +This parameter specifies the amount of time, in tenths of a second, that the DCE will remain connected to the line (off-hook) after the DCE has indicated the absence of received line signal. If the received line signal is once again detected before the time specified in **S10** expires, the DCE remains connected to the line and the call continues. + +*Defined values* + +**1 to 254** Number of tenths of a second of delay. + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory. Effect of some settings may be governed by national regulations. + +### 6.3.13 Monitor speaker loudness + +*Parameter* + +**L[]** + +*Description* + +This parameter controls the volume of the monitor speaker. The specific loudness level indicated by "low", "medium", and "high" is manufacturer-specific, although they are intended to indicate increasing volume. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 11. + +**Table 11/V.250 – Speaker loudness values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------| +| 0 | Low speaker volume | +| 1 | Low speaker volume | +| 2 | Medium speaker volume | +| 3 | High speaker volume | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory; however, if there is no monitor speaker, if the volume of the speaker is fixed, or if the volume is controllable only via a hardware control, the setting of this parameter will be ignored. + +### **6.3.14 Monitor speaker mode** + +#### *Parameter* + +**M[]** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter controls when the monitor speaker is on. The speaker shall be off while the DCE is on-hook, and may be on when the DCE is off-hook, depending on the setting of this parameter. If the setting of this parameter is changed while the DCE is already off-hook, it is desirable that the speaker be immediately set to reflect the new setting. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 12. + +**Table 12/V.250 – Speaker mode values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Speaker is always off | +| 1 | Speaker on until DCE informs DCE that carrier has been detected | +| 2 | Speaker is always on when DCE is off-hook | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory; however, if there is no monitor speaker, the setting of this parameter will be ignored. + +### **6.3.15 Store telephone number (+ASTO)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+ASTO=,** + +#### *Description* + +This parameter stores dialing strings, which may be invoked later by the **S=** dial modifier (see 6.3.1.8). + +The following characters are storable in dial strings: + +**0123456789ABCD#\*±,"TPW@!;** + +Other characters are ignored and not stored. Disposition of characters following a ";" dial modifier in a dial string is not specified. However, it is recommended that if such characters are not stored, they should be ignored. + +Lower-case letters entered are converted into upper case for storage. If the string of "storable" characters will not fit into the available space, then no change to the pre-existing stored string will occur. The command shall return the ERROR result code. + +The double-quote (") character, as such, is not permitted in a string constant and must be replaced by the combination "\"22" in . However, the actual (") character is stored (see 5.4.2.2). + +#### *Values* + +location: 0 to (one less than maximum number of storage locations). + +dial\_string: the stored phone number. + +##### *Default values* + +No values stored. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+ASTO?** + +The DCE shall return the location numbers and dial string, one pair per line for each location that has a value stored, for example: + +**+ASTO: 0,555-1234** + +**+ASTO: 3,555-4321** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+ASTO=?** + +The DCE shall return the valid range of location numbers and the maximum length of a dial string, for example: + +**+ASTO: (0-3),(20)** + +## **6.4 Modulation control commands** + +This clause defines control commands for data modems and for modems defined for use in text telephones in ITU-T Rec. V.18. + +### **6.4.1 Modulation selection (+MS)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+MS=[[,[,[,[,[,]]]]]** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to control the manner of operation of the modulation capabilities in the DCE. For DCE that supports a primary and an auxiliary channel, this parameter applies to the primary channel. It accepts six subparameters: + +- ****, a string which specifies the preferred modem carrier to use in originating or answering a connection. values are strings of up to eight characters, consisting only of numeric digits and upper-case letters. values for ITU standard + +modulations shall take the form: <1-4 digits>. Defined values are shown in Table 13 below. + +The DCE may also automatically switch to another modulation (automode), subject to several constraints: + +- The DCE might not support some other modulations, regardless of the automode mechanism supported. +- The DCE might not be able to automatically switch from the current modulation to some other modulations, restricted by the selected modulation standard and by the DCE manufacturer's technology. For example, there is no standard way to automode from ITU-T Rec. V.32 *bis* to ITU-T Rec. V.27 *ter*. +- The DTE may disable automode operation; see below. +- The DTE may constrain the range of modulations available; see and below. +- The DTE may selectively disable some modulations by reading, editing and writing the +MA parameter (see 6.4.2). + +If the DTE issues a +MS= command to the DCE, and if the DCE supports the +MA parameter, the DCE shall reinitialize the +MA parameter. + +- ****, an optional numeric value which enables or disables automatic modulation negotiation (e.g., Annex A/V.32 *bis* or ITU-T Rec. V.8). The default value shall be enabled if it is defined for the associated modulation (e.g., ITU-T Rec. V.32 *bis*, ITU-T Rec. V.8 or ITU-T Rec. V.34); however, there are modulations for which there is no automatic negotiation defined (e.g., ITU-T Rec. V.26 *bis*). +- **** and ****, optional numeric values which specify the lowest value at which the DCE may establish a connection. If unspecified (set to 0), they are determined by the modulation means selected in the and settings. Values for this subparameter are decimal encoded, in units of bit/s. +- **** and ****, optional numeric values which specify the highest value at which the DCE may establish a connection. If unspecified (set to 0), they are determined by the modulation means selected in the and settings and by the current DTE-DCE rate. Non-zero values for this subparameter are decimal encoded, in units of bit/s. +- **** and **** may be used to condition distinct limits for the receive direction as distinct from the transmit direction. For example, these can be used to select either direction for asymmetric modulations like ITU-T Rec. V.23 with constant carrier. + +NOTE 1 – ITU-T Rec. V.34 has provisions for selectively enabling modulation rates in any combination, selectively disabling any rate. Future versions of this Recommendation may define additional optional subparameters to control this V.34 feature. + +#### Defined values + +For : + +**Table 13/V.250 – Standard modulation strings** + +| | Description | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| +| | ITU-T standard modulations | +| V21 | ITU-T Rec. V.21 | +| V22 | ITU-T Rec. V.22 | +| V22B | ITU-T Rec. V.22 bis | +| V23S | ITU-T Rec. V.23, with Switched carrier, TDM | +| V23C | ITU-T Rec. V.23, with Constant carrier, asymmetric FDM | +| V26B | ITU-T Rec. V.26 bis | +| V27TC | ITU-T Rec. V.27 ter , with Constant carrier, FDM | +| V32 | ITU-T Rec. V.32 | +| V32B | ITU-T Rec. V.32 bis | +| V34 | ITU-T Rec. V.34 | +| V90 | ITU-T Rec. V.90 | +| V91 | ITU-T Rec. V.91 | +| V92 | ITU-T Rec. V.92 | +| NOTE – Manufacture proprietary strings may be defined; they shall not begin with the "V" character. | | + +For : + +| | | +|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disabled | +| 1 | Enabled, with ITU-T Rec. V.8 or Annex A/V.32 bis where applicable | + +#### Recommended default settings + +For : Manufacturer-specific +For : **1** (If possible) +For : **0** +For : **0** Maximum supported by +For : **0** If implemented +For : **0** If implemented + +##### Read syntax + +##### +MS? + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, reporting the current +MS subparameter settings, consisting of: + +**+MS: ,,,,,** + +NOTE 2 – The current active settings are reported under control of the +MR parameter. + +Optional subparameters do not need to be reported if not implemented or set to 0. + +e.g., +MS: V32B,1,1200,14400 if set to ITU-T Rec. V.32 *bis*, automode, explicit limits, but no distinct receive and transmit rate limits. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+MS=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MS: (list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values), (list of supported values)** + +Optional subparameters do not need to be reported if not implemented in the DCE. + +For example, a DCE that supported the following modulations: ITU-T Recs V.21, V.22, V.22 *bis*, V.32 and V.32 *bis*, with Automode, could report: + +**+MS: (V21,V22,V22B,V32,V32B),(0,1),(0,300-14400),(0,300-14400)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory for V-series data modems conforming to this Recommendation. + +### **6.4.2 Modulation automode control (+MA)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+MA=[[,[,[,...]]]]** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound parameter is a list of modulations that the DCE may use to connect with the remote DCE in Automode operation, for answering or originating data calls, as additional alternatives to the modulation specified in +MS=. The use of automode is controlled by the +MS=, subparameter. + +This parameter is an optional extension to the +MS command (see 6.4.1). The implied highest priority modulation is specified in the subparameter for the +MS command. As an extension of the +MS command, this parameter is reset to the manufacturer-determined default setting whenever +MS= is changed by the DTE, subject to the constraints listed below under recommended defaults. + +If the DTE writes values to +MA that are not supported for the current +MS= setting, the DCE shall return **ERROR**. + +If the automode priority has any meaning in context of the modulations specified (or depending on the availability of general mechanisms like ITU-T Rec. V.8), the order of values determines priority. + + values omitted are not available for Automode negotiation, even if the DCE is capable of them. For example, if value V26T (ITU-T Rec. V.26 *ter*) is omitted from the +MA list, this means that the DCE is not configured to automatically switch to this modulation, given the current setting of the +MS= subparameter, even if the DCE is capable of ITU-T Rec. V.26 *ter*. + +#### *Defined values* + +Valid values are defined in Table 13. +MA takes a variable number of values, limited to those values indicated by the DCE in response to a +MS=? command + +(see 6.4.1). If the DTE includes any values that the DCE does not support, the DCE shall return an **ERROR** final result code. + +#### *Recommended default settings* + +This is manufacturer determined, each time +MS= is changed. + +The valid settings for +MA are constrained by five factors: + +- the modulation types supported in the DCE; +- the current modulation selected in +MS; +- the current and selected in +MS; +- the current and selected in +MS; +- by the DCE's technology for automatic modulation selection. + +For example, if a DCE supported all V-series standard modulations from ITU-T Rec. V.21 up to ITU-T Rec. V.34, but if +MS=V32B (ITU-T Rec. V.32 *bis*) and the only Automode technology supported in the DCE is Annex A/V.32 *bis*, then this device might only apply Automode between ITU-T Recs V.32 *bis*, V.32 and V.22 *bis*. For that example, the default would be +MA=V32,V22B. If the subparameter was set to 9600, then ITU-T Rec. V.22 *bis* could not be an available Automode choice, and the default would be +MA=V32. + +##### *Read syntax* + +###### **+MA?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MA: values>** + +For example, a DCE capable of Annex A/V.32 *bis* Automode operation and set for +MS=V32B,1,2400,14400; the DCE could report: + +**+MA=V32** + +##### *Test syntax* + +##### **+MA=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MA: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that is set for a top modulation of V.34 (+MS=V34,1,300,28800) with V.8 negotiation and several symmetric duplex modulations could report: + +**+MA: (V32B,V32,V26B,V22B,V22,V21)** + +which indicates ability to Automode to ITU-T Recs V.32 *bis*, V.32, V.26 *ter*, V.22 *bis*, V.22 and V.21 in that order of preference. + +#### *Implementation* + +This command is optional. + +### **6.4.3 Modulation reporting control (+MR)** + +#### *Parameter* + +##### **+MR** + +#### Description + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls whether or not the extended-format +MCR: and +MRR: intermediate result codes are transmitted from the DCE to the DTE. The reported shall represent the current (negotiated or renegotiated) modulation . If enabled, the intermediate result codes are transmitted at the point during connect negotiation (handshaking) at which the DCE has determined which modulation and rate will be used, before any Error Control or Data Compression reports are transmitted, and before the intermediate result code **CONNECT** is transmitted. + +The format of this information text is: + +**+MCR: ** e.g., +MCR: V32B + +**+MRR: [,]** e.g., +MRR: 14400 + +**** string values are defined in Table 13. + +**** values are the decimal transmit rates in bits/s, or set to 0 if negotiation failed (e.g., V.32 *bis* cleardown). + +**** may be reported if the modulation negotiated has a different rate for the RXD channel than for the transmit channel. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 14. + +**Table 14/V.250 – Modulation reporting values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disables reporting of modulation connection (+MCR: and +MRR: are not transmitted) | +| 1 | Enables reporting of modulation connection (+MCR: and +MRR: are transmitted) | + +#### Recommended default setting + +**0** + +##### Read syntax + +**+MR?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MR:** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + ++MR:0 + +##### Test syntax + +**+MR=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MR:(list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + ++MR:(0,1) + +#### Implementation + +Implementation of this parameter and associated intermediate result codes is mandatory for V-series data modems. + +### 6.4.4 V.18 Selection (+MV18S) + +#### Parameter + +**+MV18S=[|,|,|,|,|]]]** + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to control the manner of operation of the V.18 capabilities (if present) in the DCE. It accepts five numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which specifies the calling mode of operation; +- ****, which specifies the preferred fallback mode of operation when the DCE is operating as the answerer; and +- ****, which specifies the enabling of re-acquisition after two seconds of no transmission; +- ****, which specifies the enabling of the answer message as part of continuous carrier mode probes; +- ****, which controls activation of the probing in answer mode. Disabling the probing will cause the V.18 DCE to enter the automodring monitor mode when answering. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 15. + +**Table 15/V.250 – V.18 operation modes** + +| <mode>
<dflt_ans_mode>
| Description | +|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disables V.18 operation | +| 1 | V.18 operation, auto detect mode (Note 1) | +| 2 | V.18 operation, connect in 5-bit (Baudot) mode at 45.5 bit/s | +| 12 | V.18 operation, connect in 5-bit (Baudot) mode at 50 bit/s | +| 3 | V.18 operation, connect in DTMF mode | +| 4 | V.18 operation, connect in EDT mode | +| 5 | V.18 operation, connect in V.21 mode (Note 2) | +| 6 | V.18 operation, connect in V.23 mode (Note 2) | +| 7 | V.18 operation, connect in Bell 103-type mode (Note 2) | +| 15 | V.18 operation, connect in V.21 answer mode (Note 3) | +| 16 | V.18 operation, connect in V.23 master mode (Note 3) | +| 17 | V.18 operation, connect in Bell 103 answer mode (Note 3) | +| <fbk_time_enable> | | +| 0 | Disable | +| 1 | Enable | + +**Table 15/V.250 – V.18 operation modes** + +| <ans_msg_enable> | Description | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disable | +| 1 | Enable | +| <probing_en> | | +| 0 | Disable the probing | +| 1 | Enable the probing | +| 2 | Initiate probing (expire Ta Timer) | +| NOTE 1 – There is no option to select calling or answer mode for V.18. | | +| NOTE 2 – Calling mode implies transmit on channel 1 and receive on channel 2. | | +| NOTE 3 – Answer mode implies transmit on channel 2 and receive on channel 1. | | + +#### *Recommended default settings* + +For : **0** + +For : **0** + +For : **0** + +For : **0** + +For : **1** + +##### *Read syntax* + +###### **+MV18S?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18S: ,,,** + +For example, with the recommended default settings, the DCE could report: + +**+MV18S: 0,0,0,0** + +which selects disabled mode, with re-acquisition after inactivity disabled. + +##### *Test syntax* + +##### **+MV18S=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18S:(range of supported s),(range of supported s),(range of supported s),(range of supported s)** + +For example, a completely capable DCE could report: + +**+MV18S:(0-7),(0-4),(0,1),(0,1)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.18 is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.4.5 V.18 Reporting control (+MV18R) + +#### Parameter + +**+MV18R=** + +#### Description + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls whether or not the extended-format "+MV18R:" result code is transmitted from the DCE to the DTE. The +MV18: reported shall represent the current (negotiated or renegotiated) V.18 . If enabled, the result code is transmitted at the point during connect negotiation (handshaking) at which the DCE has determined which modulation and format will be used (if any) for ITU-T Rec. V.18. The format of this result code is the following (see Table 16): + +**Table 16/V.250 – V.18 connection report intermediate result codes** + +| | | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| +MV18: 5BIT50 | Indicates connection with 5-bit mode | +| +MV18: 5BIT45 | Indicates connection with 5-bit mode | +| +MV18: EDT | Indicates connection with EDT | +| +MV18: DTMF | Indicates connection with DTMF | +| +MV18: V21C (Note) | Indicates connection with ITU-T Rec. V.21 | +| +MV18: V21A (Note) | Indicates connection with ITU-T Rec. V.21 | +| +MV18: V23M | Indicates connection with ITU-T Rec. V.23 in Master Mode (sending on 1200 bit/s, receiving on 75 bit/s) | +| +MV18: V23S | Indicates connection with ITU-T Rec. V.23 in Slave Mode, (sending on 75 bit/s, receiving on 1200 bit/s) | +| +MV18: B103C (Note) | Indicates connection with Bell 103-type modulation | +| +MV18: B103A (Note) | Indicates connection with Bell 103-type modulation | +| +MV18: V18 | Indicates both DCEs are in ITU-T Rec. V.18 | +| NOTE – "C" indicates modem is in call mode, i.e., transmitting on channel 1 and receiving on channel 2. "A" indicates modem is in answer mode. | | + +The +MV18 result code, if enabled, is issued by the DCE in place of any other modulation reporting when V.18 connection occurs (e.g., +MCR). If the +MV18 parameters are set to disable V.18 operation, the effect is to override an enable setting of +MV18R. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 17. + +**Table 17/V.250 – V.18 Reporting values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disables reporting of ITU-T Rec. V.18 connection | +| 1 | Enables reporting of ITU-T Rec. V.18 connection | + +#### Recommended default setting + +**0** + +##### Read syntax + +**+MV18R?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18R: ** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + ++MV18R: 0 + +*Test syntax* + +**+MV18R=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18R: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported both defined settings would report: + ++MV18R: (0,1) + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter (and the +MV18 result codes) is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.18 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.4.6 V.18 Answering message editing (+MV18AM)** + +*Parameter* + +**+MV18AM= []** + +*Description* + +This extended-format string parameter contains the answer message stored in the DCE and used as a probe (see 6.4.7) in the automode answer mode. The command +MV18AM="" sets this to the null string. The command +MV18AM= appends to the stored string, up to the maximum length supported by the DCE. + +*Defined values* + +message: the stored message as a string constant. + +*Recommended default setting* + +Manufacturer-specific, dependent on country of installation. + +*Read syntax* + +**+MV18AM?** + +The DCE shall transmit the text of the stored answer message to the DTE. For example, for installation in an English speaking country, it could report: + ++MV18AM: "Hello, GA" + +*Test syntax* + +**+MV18AM=?** + +The DCE shall transmit the maximum message length allowable, as a decimal value. For example, if the DCE could handle a maximum message of 100 characters, it shall report: + ++MV18AM:100 + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.18 is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.4.7 Order of probes (+MV18P) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+MV18P=[[,[,...]]]** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound parameter is a list of text telephone modes that specify the order of the modes in which to send probes during the automodring answering process. The order is of importance for minimizing the connect time when answering calls. The values 2-7, are defined in Table 18. The order determines the probing order, with the first value specified representing the first probe tried. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 18. + +**Table 18/V.250 – Probe order** + +| <probe_mode> | Description | +|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------| +| 2 | Send probe message in 5-bit (Baudot) mode | +| 3 | Send probe message in DTMF mode | +| 4 | Send probe message in EDT mode | +| 5 | Send ITU-T Rec. V.21 carrier as a probe | +| 6 | Send ITU-T Rec. V.23 carrier as a probe | +| 7 | Send Bell 103 carrier as a probe | + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +Manufacturer-specific, based on national regulations or common practice. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+MV18P?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18P: ** + +For example, if the DCE is set to support the above list in that priority order, the DCE could report: + +**+MV18P: 2,3,4,5,6,7** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+MV18P=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MV18P: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all values shall report: + +**+MV18P: (2-7)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.18 is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.4.8 Seamless rate change enable (+MSC) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+MSC=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls whether or not seamless rate change procedures are enabled during V.34 operation. + +NOTE 1 – The addition of other subparameters to control other aspects of Seamless Rate Change Operation, and control of V.90 SRC Operation, is for further study. The effect that enabling seamless rate change may have on other modem characteristics, such as startup time, is for further study. + +The results of seamless rate change negotiation are reported with the **+MSCR** indication, which is enabled with the same **+MR** command that enables other modulation reports such as **+MRR**. The form of the indication is as follows: + +**+MSCR: e.g., +MSCR: 1** + +**** has a value of zero for no V.34 seamless rate change (SRC), and a value of one for V.34 SRC operation. + +NOTE 2 – Additional reported values are for further study. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 19. + +**Table 19/V.250 – Seamless rate change control values** + +| <src_v34> | Description | +|------------------------|------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disables V.34 seamless rate change | +| 1 | Enables V.34 seamless rate change | + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**1** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+MSC?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MSC: ** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+MSC: 1** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+MSC=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+MSC: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+MSC: (0,1)** + +## 6.5 Error control commands + +This Recommendation contains parameters to condition DCE use of standard V.42 LAPM and Alternative Error Control Procedures, and Buffered modes. Support for the selection, control and reporting of other error control procedures is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +### 6.5.1 Error control selection (+ES) + +*Parameter* + +**+ES= [,,]]]** + +*Description* + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to control the manner of operation of the V.42 protocol in the DCE (if present). It accepts three numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which specifies the initial requested mode of operation when the DCE is operating as the originator; +- ****, which specifies the acceptable fallback mode of operation when the DCE is operating as the originator; +- ****, which specifies the acceptable fallback mode of operation when the DCE is operating as the answerer. + +*Defined values* + +See Table 20. + +**Table 20/V.250 – Error control operation subparameters** + +| <orig_rqst> | Description | +|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Direct mode | +| 1 | Initiate call with Buffered mode only | +| 2 | Initiate V.42 without Detection Phase. If ITU-T Rec. V.8 is in use, this is a request to disable V.42 Detection Phase | +| 3 | Initiate V.42 with Detection Phase | +| 4 | Initiate Alternative Protocol | +| <orig_fbk> | Description | +| 0 | Error control optional (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, maintain DTE-DCE data rate and use Buffered mode with flow control during non-error control operation | +| 1 | Error control optional (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, change DTE-DCE data rate to match line rate and use Direct mode | +| 2 | Error control required (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | +| 3 | Error control required (only LAPM acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | +| 4 | Error control required (only Alternative protocol acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | + +**Table 20/V.250 – Error control operation subparameters** + +| <ans_fbk> | Description | +|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Direct mode | +| 1 | Error control disabled, use Buffered mode | +| 2 | Error control optional (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, maintain DTE-DCE data rate and use local buffering and flow control during non-error control operation | +| 3 | Error control optional (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, change DTE-DCE data rate to match line rate and use Direct mode | +| 4 | Error control required (either LAPM or Alternative acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | +| 5 | Error control required (only LAPM acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | +| 6 | Error control required (only Alternative protocol acceptable); if error control not established, disconnect | + +#### *Recommended default settings* + +For :     **3** + +For :     **0** + +For :     **2** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+ES?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ES: ,,** + +e.g., +ES: 3,0,2 for the recommended defaults. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+ES=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ES: (list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values)** + +e.g., +ES: (0-4),(0-4),(0-5) for all defined values. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 error control or Buffered mode is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.5.2 Break handling in error control operation (+EB)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+EB= [[,[,]]]** + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter is used to control the manner of V.42 operation (if present in the DCE). It accepts three numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which specifies the type of break to be signalled to the remote DCE upon detecting a break from the local DTE (see ITU-T Rec. V.42 for definition of the different break types); +- ****, which specifies if the break signal to be signalled to the remote DCE is timed or not; +- ****, which specifies the amount of time in tens of milliseconds that a break should be signalled to the local DTE when an indication of break is received from the remote DCE without a break length explicitly indicated. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 21. + +**Table 21/V.250 – Break control subparameters** + +| <break_selection> | Description | +|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Ignore break (do not signal to remote DCE) | +| 1 | Non-expedited, non-destructive | +| 2 | Expedited, non-destructive | +| 3 | Expedited and destructive | +| <timed> | Description | +| 0 | Any transmitted V.42 L-SIGNAL shall not indicate break signal length | +| 1 | Any transmitted V.42 L-SIGNAL shall indicate break signal length | +| <default_length> | Description | +| 0 | Do not deliver break to DTE | +| 1 to 254 | Default break length of 0.01 to 2.54 seconds | +| Other | Higher values may be supported | + +#### Recommended default settings + +For :       **1** + +For :               **0** + +For :       **30** + +##### Read syntax + +##### **+EB?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+EB: ,,** + +e.g., +EB: 1,0,30 to report the recommended default settings. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+EB=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+EB: (range of supported values),(range of supported values), (range of supported values)** + +e.g., +EB: (0-3),(0,1),(0-200) for all defined selections and break lengths from 0.01 to two seconds. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 error control or Buffered mode is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.5.3 Selective repeat (+ESR)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+ESR=[]** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls the use of the selective reject (SREJ) option in ITU-T Rec. V.42 (if present in the DCE). + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 22. + +**Table 22/V.250 – Selective repeat values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Do not use SREJ | +| 1 | Use SREJ if available in remote DCE; continue without it if not | +| 2 | Use SREJ FCS if available in remote DCE; disconnect if SREJ is not available | + +#### *Recommended default value* + +**1** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+ESR?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ESR: ** + +e.g., +ESR: 1 for the recommended default. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+ESR=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ESR: (list of supported values)** + +e.g., +ESR: (0-2) for all defined values. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is optional. + +### 6.5.4 32-bit frame check sequence (+EFCS) + +*Parameter* + +**+EFCS=[]** + +*Description* + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls the use of the 32-bit frame check sequence option in ITU-T Rec. V.42 (if present in the DCE). + +*Defined values* + +See Table 23. + +**Table 23/V.250 – Frame check sequence values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Use 16-bit FCS | +| 1 | Use 32-bit FCS if available in remote DCE; otherwise use 16-bit FCS | +| 2 | Use 32-bit FCS if available in remote DCE; otherwise disconnect | + +*Recommended default value* + +**1** + +*Read syntax* + +**+EFCS?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+EFCS: ** + +e.g., +EFCS: 1 for the recommended default. + +*Test syntax* + +**+EFCS=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+EFCS: (list of supported values)** + +e.g., +EFCS: (0-2) for all defined values. + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 error control is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.5.5 Error control reporting (+ER) + +*Parameter* + +**+ER=[]** + +*Description* + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls whether or not the extended-format "+ER:" intermediate result code is transmitted from the DCE to the DTE. The +ER: reported shall represent the current (negotiated or renegotiated) DCE-DCE error control type. If enabled, the intermediate result code is transmitted at the point during error control negotiation (handshaking) at which the DCE has determined which error control protocol will be used (if any), before the final + +result code (e.g., CONNECT) is transmitted. The format of this result code is the following (see Table 24): + +**Table 24/V.250 – Error control report intermediate result codes** + +| | | +|------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| +ER: NONE | Error control is not in use | +| +ER: LAPM | ITU-T Rec. V.42 LAPM protocol is in use | +| +ER: ALT | ITU-T Rec. V.42 Alternative protocol is in use | + +The +ER intermediate result code, if enabled, is issued after the modulation report (+MCR and +MRR) and before the data compression report (+DR). + +*Defined values* + +See Table 25. + +**Table 25/V.250 – Error control reporting** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Error control reporting disabled (no +ER intermediate result code transmitted) | +| 1 | Error control reporting enabled (+ER intermediate result code transmitted) | + +*Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+ER?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ER: ** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+ER: 0** + +*Test syntax* + +**+ER=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ER: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+ER: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter and associated intermediate result codes are mandatory if V.42 error control is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.5.6 Call termination buffer management (+ETBM)** + +*Parameter* + +**+ETBM=[[,[,]]]** + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter controls the handling of data remaining in DCE buffers upon call termination. It accepts three numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which controls how previously-transmitted data remaining in the DCE buffers should be handled when the local DTE requests disconnection of the call; +- ****, which controls how previously-received data remaining in the DCE buffers should be handled when the remote DCE disconnects the call; and +- ****, which sets a maximum time-limit on how long the DCE will attempt to deliver the buffered data before abandoning the attempt and discarding remaining data. + +Circuit 109 is held in the ON condition until all pending data is delivered or discarded. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 26. + +**Table 26/V.250 – Call termination buffer management subparameters** + +| <pending_TD> | Description | +|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Discard all buffered data immediately and disconnect | +| 1 | Attempt until all data is delivered and acknowledged (ignore timer); if remote DCE disconnects, discard remainder | +| 2 | Attempt until all data is delivered and acknowledged; if timer expires or remote DCE disconnects, discard remainder | +| <pending_RD> | Description | +| 0 | Discard all buffered data immediately and disconnect | +| 1 | Attempt until all data is delivered (ignore timer); if local DTE requests disconnect, discard remainder | +| 2 | Attempt until all data is delivered; if timer expires or local DTE requests disconnect, discard remainder | +| <timer> | Description | +| 0 to 30 | Delivery timer value in seconds | +| Other | Higher values may be supported at manufacturer's option | + +#### Recommended default values + +For : **1** + +For : **1** + +For : **20** + +##### Read syntax + +###### **+ETBM?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ETBM: ,,** + +For example, with the recommended default settings, the DCE could report: + +**+ETBM: 1,1,20** + +*Test syntax* + +**+ETBM=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+ETBM: (list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings could report: + ++ETBM: (0-2),(0-2),(0-30) + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 error control or Buffered mode is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.5.7 Window Size (+EWIND)** + +*Parameter* + +**+EWIND=[,]** + +*Description* + +This parameter allows the user to set the maximum number of unacknowledged frames allowed at the link layer (window size), N401. Changes to this value take effect when the next connection is established. + +Value1 is the desired window size in the transmit direction, value2 for the receive direction. If value2 is 0 or is not included, then value1 is used for value2. + +Value2 is optional for the DCE. If not supported by the DCE, then it must accept value 0 without error. + +*Defined values* + +**1-127** + +*Recommended default setting* + +15 (per ITU-T Rec. V.42). + +*Read syntax* + +**+EWIND?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE: + +**+EWIND: ,** + +If the DCE does not support a separate value2, then the information text shall report 0 as value2. + +*Test syntax* + +**+EWIND=?** + +The DCE shall transmit the supported range to the DTE as in the following example: + ++EWIND: (1-127),() + +If value2 is not supported by the DCE, then the test response shall have the value 0 for value2 range. + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +### 6.5.8 Frame Length (+EFRAM) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+EFRAM**=[,] + +#### *Description* + +This parameter indicates the maximum link layer frame information field size that shall be attempted with the protocol. The values equal the information field size in octets. The desired frame sizes shall be the smaller of the sizes indicated by the values of +EFRAM and any restrictions imposed by the particular link layer protocol in use. + +Value1 is for the sending direction, value2 for the receiving. If value2 is not specified or has value 0, then value1 shall be used for both directions of transmission. + +#### *Defined values* + +**1** to **65535** bytes. + +Value2 is optional for the DCE. If value2 is not supported, then a value2 of 0 must be accepted by the DCE without error. + +NOTE – A DCE may support a smaller range and may round the value to the nearest power of 2. + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**128** (per ITU-T Rec. V.42). + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+EFRAM?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE. + +**+EFRAM:** , + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+EFRAM=?** + +The DCE shall transmit the supported range of values to the DTE as in the following example: + +**+EFRAM:** (16-4096), + +The value2 range shall be 0 if a separate value2 is not supported. + +#### *Implementation* + +Optional + +## 6.6 Data compression commands + +This clause contains parameters to condition the DCE to use standard Data Compression Procedures. + +### 6.6.1 V.42 *bis* data compression (+DS) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+DS**=[[,[,[,]]]] + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound parameter controls the V.42 *bis* data compression function if provided in the DCE. It accepts four numeric subparameters: + +- ****, which specifies the desired direction(s) of operation of the data compression function; from the DTE point of view; + +- ****, which specifies whether or not the DCE should continue to operate if the desired result is not obtained; +- ****, which specifies the maximum number of dictionary entries which should be negotiated (may be used by the DTE to limit the codeword size transmitted, based on its knowledge of the nature of the data to be transmitted); +- ****, which specifies the maximum string length to be negotiated (V.42 *bis* P2). + +*Defined values* + +See Table 27. + +**Table 27/V.250 – Data compression control subparameters** + +| <direction> | Description | +|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Negotiated ... no compression (V.42 bis P0 = 0) | +| 1 | Transmit only | +| 2 | Receive only | +| 3 | Both directions, accept any direction (V.42 bis P0 = 11) | +| <compression_negotiation> | | +| 0 | Do not disconnect if ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis is not negotiated by the remote DCE as specified in | +| 1 | Disconnect if ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis is not negotiated by the remote DCE as specified in | +| <max_dict> | 512 to 65535 | +| <max_string> | 6 to 250 | + +*Recommended default settings* + +For : **3** + +For : **0** + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix II/V.42 *bis*) + +For : **6** + +*Read syntax* + +**+DS?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+DS=,,,** + +e.g., +DS:3,0,8192,6 for the recommended defaults and 8K max dictionary. + +*Test syntax* + +**+DS=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+DS: (list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values)** + +e.g., +DS: (0-3),(0-2),(512-8192),(6-250). + +#### Implementation + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.42 *bis* data compression is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.6.2 V.44 Data Compression (+DS44) + +#### Parameter + ++DS44=[[,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,]]]]]]] + +#### Description + +This extended-format compound parameter controls the V.44 data compression function if provided in the DCE. It accepts nine numeric subparameters: + +- , which specifies the desired direction(s) of operation of the data compression function; from the DTE point of view; +- , which specifies whether or not the DCE should continue to operate if the desired result is not obtained; +- , which specifies the use of stream method, packet method, multi-packet method; +- , which specifies the maximum number of codewords which should be negotiated in the transmit direction; +- , which specifies the maximum number of codewords which should be negotiated in the receive direction; +- , which specifies the maximum string length to be negotiated in the transmit direction; +- , which specifies the maximum string length to be negotiated in the receive direction; +- , which specifies the maximum size of the history buffer to be negotiated in the transmit direction; +- , which specifies the maximum size of the history buffer to be negotiated in the receive direction. + +#### Defined values + +See Table 28. + +**Table 28/V.250 – Data compression control subparameters** + +| | Description | +|-------------|---------------------------------------| +| 0 | Negotiated ... no compression | +| 1 | Transmit only | +| 2 | Receive only | +| 3 | Both directions, accept any direction | + +**Table 28/V.250 – Data compression control subparameters** + +| <compression_negotiation> | Description | +|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Do not disconnect if ITU-T Rec. V.44 is not negotiated by the remote DCE as specified in | +| 1 | Disconnect if ITU-T Rec. V.44 is not negotiated by the remote DCE as specified in | +| <capability> | | +| 0 | Stream method | +| 1 | Packet method | +| 2 | Multi-packet method | +| <max_codewords_tx> | 256 to 65536 | +| <max_codewords_rx> | 256 to 65536 | +| <max_string_tx> | 32 to 255 | +| <max_string_rx> | 32 to 255 | +| <max_history_tx> | ≥ 512 | +| <max_history_rx> | ≥ 512 | + +#### *Recommended default settings* + +For : **3** + +For : **0** + +For : **0** + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +For : Determined by the manufacturer (see Appendix I/V.44) + +##### *Read syntax* + +##### **+DS44?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+DS44:,,,,,,,** + +e.g., +DS44:3,0,0,1024,1024,255,255,3072,3072. + +##### *Test syntax* + +##### **+DS44=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+DS44: (list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported ** + +values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values),(list of supported values) + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if V.44 data compression is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.6.3 Data compression reporting (+DR)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+DR=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format numeric parameter controls whether or not the extended-format "+DR." intermediate result code is transmitted from the DCE to the DTE. The +DR: reported shall represent the current (negotiated or renegotiated) DCE-DCE data compression type. If enabled, the intermediate result code is transmitted at the point after error control negotiation (handshaking) at which the DCE has determined which data compression technique will be used (if any) and the direction of operation. The format of this result code is the following (see Table 29): + +**Table 29/V.250 – Data compression reporting intermediate result codes** + +| | | +|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------| +| +DR: NONE | Data compression is not in use | +| +DR: V42B | ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis is in use in both directions | +| +DR: V42B RD | ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis is in use in receive direction only | +| +DR: V42B TD | ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis is in use in transmit direction only | +| +DR: V44 | ITU-T Rec. V.44 is in use in both directions | +| +DR: V44 RD | ITU-T Rec. V.44 is in use in receive direction only | +| +DR: V44 TD | ITU-T Rec. V.44 is in use in transmit direction only | + +The +DR intermediate result code, if enabled, is issued after the Error Control Report (+ER) and before the final result code (e.g., CONNECT). + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 30. + +**Table 30/V.250 – Data compression reporting values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Data compression reporting disabled (no +DR result code transmitted) | +| 1 | Data compression reporting enabled (+DR result code transmitted) | + +#### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +##### **+DR?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +##### **+DR: ** + +For example, with the recommended default setting, the DCE could report: + +##### **+DR: 0** + +*Test syntax* + +##### **+DR=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +##### **+DR: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +##### **+DR: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter and the associated intermediate result code is mandatory if data compression is implemented in the DCE. + +## **6.7 DCE testing** + +This clause contains a set of +T (test) commands and parameters that are based on the test objects of ITU-T Rec. V.58. + +The parameters correspond as closely as possible to V.58 objects. In some cases the parameters were structured to more in keeping with AT command practice. + +### **6.7.1 List of test commands and parameters** + +The following commands and parameters are defined in this clause: + +| | | +|--------|----------------------------------| +| +TE140 | Enable Ckt 140 | +| +TE141 | Enable Ckt 141 | +| +TERDL | Enable RDL From Remote | +| +TEPDL | Enable Front Panel RDL | +| +TEPAL | Enable Front Panel Analogue Loop | +| +TALS | Analogue Loop Status | +| +TDLS | Local Digital Loop Status | +| +TRDLS | Remote Digital Loop Status | +| +TADR | Local V.54 Address | +| +TMODE | Set V.54 Mode | +| +TTER | Test Error Rate | +| +TNUM | Errored Bit and Block Counts | +| +TLDL | Local Digital Loop | +| +TRDL | Request Remote Digital Loop | +| +TAL | Local Analogue Loop | + ++TSELF    Self Test ++TRES     Self Test Result + +### **6.7.2    Test commands and parameters** + +#### **6.7.2.1    Enable Ckt 140 (+TE140)** + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TE140=** + +##### *Description* + +This parameter enables or disables DCE response to signals on V.24 circuit 140, which controls remote digital loop (V.54 loop 2). + +##### *Values* + +**0**        Disabled +**1**        Enabled + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0**        Disabled + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TE140?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TE140: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TE140=?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TE140: (0,1)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.2    Enable Ckt 141 (+TE141)** + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TE141=** + +##### *Description* + +This parameter enables or disables DCE response to signals on circuit 141, which controls local analogue loop test (V.54 loop 3). + +##### *Defined values* + +**0**        Response is disabled +**1**        Response is enabled + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0**        Disabled + +*Read syntax* + +**+TE141?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TE141: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+TE141=?** + +The DCE shall transmit the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TE141: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.3 Enable RDL From Remote (+TERDL)** + +*Parameter* + +**+TERDL=** + +*Description* + +This parameter enables the local DCE response to a digital loop command (V.54 loop 2 initiation) from the remote DCE. + +*Defined values* + +**0** Local DCE will ignore command from remote + +**1** Local DCE will obey command from remote + +*Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+TERDL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TERDL: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+TERDL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TERDL: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.4 Enable Front Panel RDL (+TEPDL)** + +*Parameter* + +**+TEPDL=** + +*Description* + +This parameter enables the sending of RDL (V.54 loop 2 initiation) commands to the remote DCE from the front panel control. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** Disabled + +**1** Enabled + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TEPDL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TEPDL: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TEPDL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TEPDL: (0,1)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.5 Enable Front Panel Analogue Loop (+TEPAL)** + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TEPAL=** + +##### *Description* + +This parameter enables initiation of local analogue loop by the front panel (V.54 loop 3). + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** Disabled + +**1** Enabled + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TEPAL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TEPAL: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TEPAL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TEPAL: (0,1)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.6 Analogue Loop Status (+TALS) + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TALS?** + +##### *Description* + +This read-only parameter reports the current status of the local analogue loop (V.54 loop 3). + +##### *Values* + +- 0** Inactive +- 1** V.24 circuit 141 invoked +- 2** Front panel invoked +- 3** Network management system invoked + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TALS?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TALS: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TALS=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TALS: (range of supported values)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.7 Local Digital Loop Status (+TDLS) + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TDLS?** + +##### *Description* + +This read-only parameter reports the status of the local digital loop (V.54 loop 1). + +##### *Defined values* + +- 0** Disabled +- 1** Enabled, inactive +- 2** Front panel invoked +- 3** Network management system invoked +- 4** Remote invoked + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+TDLS?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TDLS: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+TDLS=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TDLS: (range of supported values)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.8 Remote Digital Loop Status (+TRDLS)** + +*Parameter* + +**+TRDLS?** + +*Description* + +This read-only parameter reports the status of the remote local digital loop (V.54 loop 2). + +*Defined values* + +- | | | +|----------|-----------------------------------| +| 0 | Disabled | +| 1 | Enabled, inactive | +| 2 | V.24 circuit 140 invoked | +| 3 | Front panel invoked | +| 4 | Network management system invoked | + +*Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+TRDLS?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRDLS: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+TRDLS=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRDLS: (range of supported values)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.9 Local V.54 Address (+TADR)** + +*Parameter* + +**+TADR=** + +##### *Description* + +This parameter is the V.54 address of the local DCE. + +##### *Defined values* + +See Table 4/V.54 + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TADR?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TADR: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TADR=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TADR: (range of supported V.54 address values)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.10 Set V.54 Mode (+TMODE)** + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TMODE=** + +##### *Description* + +This parameter selects the V.54 mode: point-to-point or multipoint. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** Point-to-point + +**1** Multipoint or tandem + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TMODE?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TMODE: ** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TMODE=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TMODE: (0,1)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.11 Test Error Rate (+TTER) + +##### *Syntax* + +**+TTER=,,,** + +##### *Description* + +This command starts and stops a bit error rate or block error rate test. A suitable loop must be established before this test can proceed. The DCE remains in Command State after this command is executed. The parameter +TTER=0 stops the test. When the test is stopped, the block and bit error count is preserved and can be determined by the +TNUM parameter. + +##### *Defined values* + +| | | | +|--------------|---------|------------------------------| +| Type | 0 | Stop the test | +| | 1 | Bit error rate | +| | 2 | Block error rate | +| | 3 | Both | +| Block length | 1-65535 | bits | +| Blocks | 1-65535 | blocks | +| Pattern | 0 | 63-bit pseudo-random pattern | +| | 1 | 511-bit pattern | +| | 2 | 2047-bit pattern | +| | 3 | All ones | +| | 4 | Alternating ones and zeroes | + +##### *Execution time* + +Command execution consists of starting or stopping the test in question. In the case of starting a test, the test continues to run until the specified block count is reached or a type of 0 is sent to the DCE. The time depends on the current DCE speed. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TTER?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TTER: ,,,** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TTER=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TTER: (range of supported type),(range of supported block\_length),(range of supported blocks),(range of supported pattern)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.12 Errored Bit and Block Counts (+TNUM) + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TNUM?** + +##### *Description* + +The values of this parameter are the number of errored bits and blocks received during the current or last error rate test. This is a read-only, double-valued parameter. The response to +TNUM? is the number of bit and block errors detected during the current or previous test. If either of the error counts is not available, the number displayed is 0. See also the +TTER command. + +##### *Defined values* + +bit\_errors        0-65535 + +block\_errors     0-65535 + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TNUM?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TTER: ,** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TTER=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TTER: (range of supported bit\_errors),(range of supported block\_errors)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.13 Local Digital Loop (+TLDL)** + +##### *Syntax* + +**+TLDL=** + +##### *Description* + +This command starts a digital loop of the local DCE. The test stops when the command +TLDL=0 is received by the DCE. This command is valid only while the DCE is connected to a remote DCE (Online Command State). + +When the DCE is in digital loop mode, all characters sent from the DTE to the DCE are looped and returned to the DTE unless an error rate test is invoked. See the +TTER command. + +The DCE must be placed in Online Command State in order to accept a command to stop the local digital loop. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0**        Stop test + +**1**        Start test + +##### *Execution time* + +Command execution consists of starting or stopping the test in question. The test continues to run until a +TLDL=0 command is sent to the DCE. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TLDL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TLDL: 0** If a test is not in progress + +**+TLDL: 1** If a test is in progress + +*Test syntax* + +**+TLDL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TLDL: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### **6.7.2.14 Request Remote Digital Loop (+TRDL)** + +*Syntax* + +**+TRDL=** + +*Description* + +This command starts or stops a digital loop (V.54 loop 2) at the remote DCE. This command is valid only while the DCE is in the online command state. + +After issuing this command, the DTE will normally issue the ATO command to return to the online state. + +An **OK** result code is returned and V.24 circuit 107 (DSR) is turned off after the remote DCE signals acceptance of the command. + +If confirmation is not received, then the DCE shall return the ERROR result code. + +*Defined values* + +**0** Stop RDL + +**1** Start RDL + +*Execution time* + +Command execution consists of starting or stopping the test in question. The test continues to run until a +TRDL=0 command is sent to the DCE. + +*Abortability* + +Command execution consists of the transient action of starting or stopping the test in question and is thus not abortable. + +*Read syntax* + +**+TRDL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRDL: 0** If a test is not in progress + +**+TRDL: 1** If a test is in progress + +*Test syntax* + +**+TRDL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRDL: (0,1)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.15 Local Analogue Loop (+TAL) + +##### *Syntax* + +**+TAL=,** + +##### *Description* + +This command starts or stops a local analogue loop (V.54 loop 3). For the case of starting a loop, the DCE issues an OK result code and returns to online command state if the loop initiation was successful, and issues a NO CARRIER result code and returns to command state if not successful. The subparameter is applicable to frequency divided duplex modems. The DCE continues in loop 3 mode until stopped by a subsequent +TAL=0 command. + +Non-zero values of are not valid in online command state. + +Unless an error rate test is invoked, the DTE will normally enter Data State with ATO. In Data State, all characters sent to the DCE are looped back to the DTE; the DTE must cause a change to the command state in order to command an end to the loop condition. + +If an error rate test is enabled, that test continues until stopped by command. At the end of the error rate test, the DCE remains in the looped condition, until the loop is disabled. + +##### *Defined values* + +| | | | +|--------|---|-----------------------| +| Action | 0 | Disable analogue loop | +| | 1 | Enable analogue loop | +| Band | 0 | Low frequency band | +| | 1 | High frequency band | + +NOTE 1 – If is omitted, 0 is assumed. + +NOTE 2 – If a valid is supplied but is not needed, the DCE shall ignore it. + +##### *Execution time* + +Command execution consists of starting or stopping the test in question. The test continues to run until a +TAL=0 command is sent to the DCE. + +##### *Abortability* + +Command execution consists of the transient action of starting or stopping the test in question and is thus not abortable. + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+TAL?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TAL: 0** If a test is not in progress + +**+TAL: 1** If a test is in progress + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TAL=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TAL: (0,1),(range of supported band values)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.16 Self Test (+TSELF) + +##### *Syntax* + +**+TSELF=** + +##### *Description* + +This command invokes a self test of the modem. The nature of this test is not specified; however it shall include checks on the operation of hardware components and memory. It is assumed that the test duration is short (typically no longer than 5 seconds). A full test of DCE functions is assumed to be intrusive, i.e., would interfere with normal operation; a partial test is assumed to be non-intrusive, i.e., could typically be performed during online command state, but only provides a cursory check on DCE operation. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** Intrusive full test + +**1** Safe partial test + +##### *Execution time* + +The execution time is implementation-specific: typically no longer than 5 seconds. + +##### *Abortability* + +This command is not ordinarily abortable, but may be so in some implementations. + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+TSELF=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TSELF: (range of supported values)** + +##### *Implementation* + +Optional + +#### 6.7.2.17 Self Test Result (+TRES) + +##### *Parameter* + +**+TRES?** + +##### *Description* + +This read-only parameter contains the result of the last self test conducted since power up or reset. If a test has not been conducted, then the value shall be 0. + +##### *Defined values* + +**0** No test + +**1** Pass + +**2** Fail + +##### *Recommended default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+TRES?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRES: ** + +*Test syntax* + +**+TRES=?** + +The DCE shall send the following information text to the DTE: + +**+TRES: (0-2)** + +*Implementation* + +Optional + +## **6.8 PCM DCE commands** + +This clause contains a set of +P (PCM DCE) commands and parameters to condition and control DCE use of ITU-T Rec. V.92. + +### **6.8.1 Call Waiting enable (+PCW)** + +*Parameter* + +**+PCW=[]** + +*Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls the action to be taken upon detection of call waiting in a V.92 DCE. + +*Defined values* + +See Table 31. + +**Table 31/V.250 – Call Waiting Values** + +| <call waiting> | Description | +|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Toggle V.24 Circuit 125 and collect Caller ID if enabled by +VCID | +| 1 | Hang up | +| 2 | Ignore V.92 call waiting | + +*Default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+PCW?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PCW: ** + +For example, with the default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+PCW: 0** + +*Test syntax* + +**+PCW=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PCW: (list of supported values of )** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PCW: (0,1,2)** + +*Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.8.2 Modem-on-Hold enable (+PMH)** + +*Parameter* + +**+PMH=[]** + +*Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls whether or not modem-on-hold procedures are enabled during V.92 operation. + +*Defined values* + +See Table 32. + +**Table 32/V.250 – Modem-on-hold enable** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------| +| 0 | Enables V.92 modem on hold | +| 1 | Disables V.92 modem on hold | + +*Default setting* + +**0** + +*Read syntax* + +**+PMH?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PMH: ** + +For example, with the default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+PMH: 0** + +*Test syntax* + +**+PMH=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PMH: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PMH: (0,1)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.8.3 Modem-on-Hold Timer (+PMHT)** + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls whether or not the modem will grant or deny a Modem-on-hold (MOH) request as well as setting the Modem-on-Hold Timeout. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 33. + +**Table 33/V.250 – Modem-on-Hold Timer values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------| +| 0 | Deny V.92 Modem-on-hold Request | +| 1 | Grant MOH with 10-second timeout | +| 2 | Grant MOH with 20-second timeout | +| 3 | Grant MOH with 30-second timeout | +| 4 | Grant MOH with 40-second timeout | +| 5 | Grant MOH with 1-minute timeout | +| 6 | Grant MOH with 2-minute timeout | +| 7 | Grant MOH with 3-minute timeout | +| 8 | Grant MOH with 4-minute timeout | +| 9 | Grant MOH with 6-minute timeout | +| 10 | Grant MOH with 8-minute timeout | +| 11 | Grant MOH with 12-minute timeout | +| 12 | Grant MOH with 16-minute timeout | +| 13 | Grant MOH with indefinite timeout | + +##### *Read syntax* + +##### **+PMHT?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PMHT: ** + +For example, with set to Deny V.92 Modem-on-hold Request, the DCE would report: + +**+PMHT: 0** + +##### *Test syntax* + +##### **+PMHT=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PMHT: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PMHT: (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.8.4 Initiate Modem on Hold (+PMHR) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+PMHR** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format command requests the DCE to initiate or to confirm a modem-on-hold procedure. The DCE shall return **ERROR** if Modem on Hold is not enabled or if the DCE is in an idle condition. The DCE shall return the string response +PMHR: where is a decimal value corresponding to the Modem-on-Hold timer value received or the request status during the DCE's modem on hold exchange procedure as defined in Table 34. This response may be delayed depending upon the context under which the +PMHR command is made, i.e., if the +PMHR is in response to an incoming Modem on Hold or if it is initiating a request. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Read Syntax* + +**+PMHR** + +**Table 34/V.250 – Modem-on-Hold Response values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | V.92 Modem-on-Hold Request Denied or not available. The modem may initiate another Modem-on-hold request later. | +| 1 | MOH with 10-second timeout Granted | +| 2 | MOH with 20-second timeout Granted | +| 3 | MOH with 30-second timeout Granted | +| 4 | MOH with 40-second timeout Granted | +| 5 | MOH with 1-minute timeout Granted | +| 6 | MOH with 2-minute timeout Granted | +| 7 | MOH with 3-minute timeout Granted | +| 8 | MOH with 4-minute timeout Granted | +| 9 | MOH with 6-minute timeout Granted | +| 10 | MOH with 8-minute timeout Granted | +| 11 | MOH with 12-minute timeout Granted | +| 12 | MOH with 16-minute timeout Granted | +| 13 | MOH with indefinite timeout Granted | +| 14 | MOH Request denied. Future requests will also be denied during this session. | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### 6.8.5 PCM upstream ignore (+PIG) + +#### *Parameter* + +**+PIG=[]** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls the use of PCM upstream in a V.92 DCE. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 35. + +**Table 35/V.250 – PCM upstream ignore values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|----------------------| +| 0 | Enable PCM upstream | +| 1 | Disable PCM upstream | + +#### *Default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+PIG?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PIG: ** + +For example, with the default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+PIG: 0** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+PIG=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PIG: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PIG: (0,1)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.8.6 V.92 Modem-on-Hold Hook Flash (+PMHF)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+PMHF** + +#### *Description* + +This command causes the DCE to go on-hook for a specified period of time, and then return on-hook. The specified period of time is normally one-half second, but may be governed by national regulations. If this command is initiated and the modem is not On Hold, **ERROR** is returned. This command applies only to V.92 Modem on Hold. + +#### *Defined values* + +None. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.8.7 V.92 Phase 1 and Phase 2 Control (+PQC)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+PQC=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter controls the global enabling or disabling of the V.92 shortened Phase 1 and Phase 2 startup procedures, not the initiation thereof. This command is used in conjunction with the +PSS command. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 36. + +**Table 36/V.250 – Phase 1 and Phase 2 values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------------| +| 0 | Enable Short Phase 1 and Short Phase 2 | +| 1 | Enable Short Phase 1 | +| 2 | Enable Short Phase 2 | +| 3 | Disable short Phase 1 and Short Phase 2 | + +#### *Default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+PQC?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PQC: ** + +For example, with the default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+PQC: 0** + +##### *Test syntax* + +**+PQC=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PQC: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PQC: (0,1,2,3)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +### **6.8.8 Use Short Sequence (+PSS)** + +#### *Parameter* + +**+PSS=** + +#### *Description* + +This extended-format compound numeric parameter causes a calling DCE to force either a V.92 short or full startup sequence as defined by the +PQC command on the next and subsequent connections. + +#### *Defined values* + +See Table 37. + +**Table 37/V.250 – Use Short Sequence Values** + +| <value> | Description | +|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | The DCEs decide whether or not to use the short startup procedures. The short startup procedures shall only be used if enabled by the +PQC command. | +| 1 | Forces the use of the short startup procedures on the next and subsequent connections if they are enabled by the +PQC command. | +| 2 | Forces the use of the full startup procedures on the next and subsequent connections independent of the setting of the +PQC command. | + +#### *Default setting* + +**0** + +##### *Read syntax* + +**+PSS?** + +The DCE shall transmit a line of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PSS: ** + +For example, with the default setting, the DCE could report: + +**+PSS: 0** + +##### *Text syntax* + +**+PSS=?** + +The DCE shall transmit a string of information text to the DTE, consisting of: + +**+PSS: (list of supported values)** + +For example, a DCE that supported all defined settings would report: + +**+PSS: (0,1,2)** + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this parameter is mandatory if ITU-T Rec. V.92 is implemented in the DCE. + +## **6.9 V.59 Command (+TMO)** + +This extended-format command causes the DCE to transmit one or more lines of information text in specific formats. The command retrieves the information from the managed objects in ITU-T Rec. V.59. The command can be used in three ways as described in the following clauses. + +### **6.9.1 Repeat last +TMO command** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+TMO** + +#### *Description* + +The +TMO command without extensions will cause the DCE to repeat the last +TMO command that was issued. + +NOTE – For all common mid-level objects retrieved by the +TMO command, only the one applicable to the most recent modulation used, irrespective of how many modulations the modem has operated in during the previous connection, is returned. + +### **6.9.2 Retrieve diagnostic supported** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+TMO []=?** + +#### *Defined list levels:* + +- 0 The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the list of all objects support as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.59. +- 1 The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the list of all high-level objects supported as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.59. +- 2 The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the list of all mid-level objects supported as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.59. +- 3 The DCE shall transmit information text which reports the list of all low-level objects supported as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.59. +- 4 The DCE shall transmit 0 if it supports object names, and 1 if it supports tagIDs. + +#### *Defined :* + +- n If present, the object names are returned; if not present, tagIDs are returned. n shall not be used with list level 4. If a DCE supports only tagIDs and n is included with the +TMO command, **ERROR** will be returned. + +For example, a DCE that supported both object names and tagIDs would report: + +**+TMO 4=? (0,1)** + +### **6.9.3 Retrieve specific diagnostic information** + +#### *Syntax* + +**+TMO ** + +#### *Description* + +This command retrieves the diagnostic identified by either the V.59 tagID or the name. The response from the DCE shall be in the same form as the request, i.e., a tagID will return a response identified by the tagID. A named diagnostic will return the name and the requested information. + +A two-digit tagID indicates that the request is for the high-level V.59 objects. A four-digit tagID indicates that the request is for a mid-level or a low-level V.59 object. + + specifies if any or all sub-objects of a high- or mid-level objects are returned in response to the command. + +For example: + +**+TMO ** + +**+TMO V92 All** would return all the diagnostics defined for ITU-T Rec. V.92 in ITU-T Rec. V.59. + +**+TMO V92 rxHistory** would only return the rx rate history of the V.92 diagnostic as defined in ITU-T Rec. V.59. + ++TMO + ++TMO 09 would return the entire V.90 object. + ++TMO 0900 would return mode V.90 object only. + +# Appendix I + +## Summary of basic and extended format commands + +**Table I.1/V.250 – Defined leading character sequences** + +| Leadin | Includes commands related to | +|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| +A | Call control (network Addressing) issues, common, PSTN, ISDN, ITU-T Rec. X.25, switched digital | +| +C | Digital Cellular extensions | +| +D | Data Compression, ITU-T Rec. V.42 bis | +| +E | Error Control, ITU-T Rec. V.42 | +| +F | Facsimile, ITU-T Rec. T.30, etc. | +| +G | Generic issues such as identity and capabilities | +| +I | DTE-DCE Interface issues, ITU-T Rec. V.24, etc. | +| +M | Modulation, ITU-T Rec. V.32 bis , etc. | +| +P | PCM DCE commands, ITU-T Rec. V.92 | +| +S | Switched or Simultaneous Data Types | +| +T | Test issues | +| +V | Voice extensions | +| +W | Wireless extensions | +| NOTE – See Supplement 1 to this Recommendation for a current summary of other Standards that are based on this Recommendation. | | + +**Table I.2/V.250 – Summary of commands** + +| Name | Type | Syntax | Reference | Description | +|-------|-----------|----------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| &C | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.8 | Circuit 109 (Received line signal detector) behaviour | +| &D | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.9 | Circuit 108 (Data terminal ready) behaviour | +| &F | Action | Basic | 6.1.2 | Set to factory-defined configuration | +| +DR | Parameter | Extended | 6.6.2 | Data compression reporting | +| +DS | Parameter | Extended | 6.6.1 | Data compression | +| +DS44 | Parameter | Extended | 6.6.2 | V.44 Data compression | +| +EB | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.2 | Break handling in error control operation | +| +EFCS | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.4 | 32-bit frame check sequence | +| +ER | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.5 | Error control reporting | +| +ES | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.1 | Error control selection | +| +ESR | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.3 | Selective repeat | + +**Table I.2/V.250 – Summary of commands** + +| Name | Type | Syntax | Reference | Description | +|-------------|-------------|---------------|------------------|----------------------------------------------| +| +ETBM | Parameter | Extended | 6.5.6 | Call termination buffer management | +| +GCAP | Action | Extended | 6.1.9 | Request complete capabilities list | +| +GCI | Parameter | Extended | 6.1.10 | Country of installation | +| +GMI | Action | Extended | 6.1.4 | Request manufacturer identification | +| +GMM | Action | Extended | 6.1.5 | Request model identification | +| +GMR | Action | Extended | 6.1.6 | Request revision identification | +| +GOI | Action | Extended | 6.1.8 | Request global object identification | +| +GSN | Action | Extended | 6.1.7 | Request product serial number identification | +| +ICF | Parameter | Extended | 6.2.11 | DTE-DCE character framing | +| +IFC | Parameter | Extended | 6.2.12 | DTE-DCE local flow control | +| +ILRR | Parameter | Extended | 6.2.13 | DTE-DCE local rate reporting | +| +IPR | Parameter | Extended | 6.2.10 | Fixed DTE rate | +| +MA | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.2 | Modulation automode control | +| +MR | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.3 | Modulation reporting control | +| +MS | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.1 | Modulation selection | +| +MV18AM | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.6 | Answering message editing | +| +MV18P | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.7 | Order of probes | +| +MV18R | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.5 | V.18 reporting control | +| +MV18S | Parameter | Extended | 6.4.4 | V.18 selection | +| +PCW | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.1 | Call Waiting enable | +| +PMH | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.2 | Modem-on-Hold enable | +| +PMHT | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.3 | Modem-on-Hold Timer | +| +PMHR | Action | Extended | 6.8.4 | Initiate Modem on Hold | +| +PIG | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.5 | PCM upstream ignore | +| +PMHF | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.6 | V.92 Modem-on-Hold Hook Flash | +| +PQC | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.7 | V.92 Phase 1 and Phase 2 Control | +| +PSS | Parameter | Extended | 6.8.8 | Use Short Sequence | +| +TMO | Parameter | Extended | 6.9 | V.59 command | +| A | Action | Basic | 6.3.5 | Answer | +| D | Action | Basic | 6.3.1 | Dial | +| E | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.4 | Command echo | +| H | Action | Basic | 6.3.6 | Hook control | +| I | Action | Basic | 6.1.3 | Request identification information | +| L | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.13 | Monitor speaker loudness | +| M | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.14 | Monitor speaker mode | +| O | Action | Basic | 6.3.7 | Return to online data state | +| P | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.3 | Select pulse dialling | +| Q | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.5 | Result code suppression | +| S0 | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.8 | Automatic answer | +| S10 | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.12 | Automatic disconnect delay | + +**Table I.2/V.250 – Summary of commands** + +| Name | Type | Syntax | Reference | Description | +|------|-----------|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------| +| S3 | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.1 | Command line termination character | +| S4 | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.2 | Response formatting character | +| S5 | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.3 | Command line editing character | +| S6 | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.9 | Pause before blind dialling | +| S7 | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.10 | Connection completion timeout | +| S8 | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.11 | Comma dial modifier time | +| T | Parameter | Basic | 6.3.2 | Select tone dialling | +| V | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.6 | DCE response format | +| X | Parameter | Basic | 6.2.7 | Result code selection and call progress monitoring control | +| Z | Action | Basic | 6.1.1 | Reset to default configuration | + +# Appendix II + +## DCE configuration, dialling, negotiation and reporting, example session + +**Table II.1/V.250** + +| DTE Command | DCE Response | DCE action | Line condition | Reference | +|--------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------| +| AT+GCAP | +MS, +ES,
+DS
OK | Indicate areas of capabilities | On-hook | 6.1.9 | +| AT&F | OK | Initialize parameters to factory default | On-hook | 6.1.2 | +| AT&D2 | OK | Set-up of DTR hangup | On-hook | 6.2.9 | +| AT+MS=11,1;
+MR=1 | OK | Set-up modulation enable reports | On-hook | 6.4.1
6.4.3 | +| AT+ES=3,0,2;
+ER=1 | OK | Set-up error control enable reports | On-hook | 6.5.1
6.5.5 | +| AT+DS=3,1;
+DR=1 | OK | Set-up compression enable reports | On-hook | 6.6.1
6.6.2 | +| AT+IFC=2,2 | OK | Set-up flow control | On-hook | 6.2.12 | +| AT+IPR=57600;
+ILRR=1 | OK | Set-up local port rate enable reports | On-hook | 6.2.12
6.2.13 | + +**Table II.1/V.250** + +| DTE Command | DCE Response | DCE action | Line condition | Reference | +|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| ATDT | +MCR:
V32B
+MRR:
14400
+ER: LAPM
+DR: V42B
+ILRR:
57600
CONNECT
| | Off-hook
Dial
Carrier type
Carrier rate
Error control
Compression
Local port rate
Result code | 6.3.1

6.4.3
6.4.3
6.4.5
6.5.5
6.6.2 | +| -> | <- | Data connection | Connection | | +| | OK | Hang up | Hang up | 6.3.6 | + +# Appendix III + +## Encapsulation of V.250 messages in V.25 *bis* DCE + +## III.1 Scope + +This appendix defines the means to use V.250 messages in a V.25 *bis* compliant DCE. + +This Recommendation contains three types of messages: + +- commands, with parameters as needed; +- final or intermediate result codes; +- information text. + +## III.2 Encapsulation of V.250 messages + +A DCE compliant with ITU-T Rec. V.25 *bis* and this appendix shall implement two new opcodes. See Table III.1. + +**Table III.1/V.250 – V.250 opcodes for encapsulation of V.250 messages** + +| Op Code | Description | Messages | Examples | +|----------------|---------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------| +| EXC | EXtended Command | Commands | EXC+GMI?
EXC+MR=1 | +| EXI | EXtended Indication | Result codes,
information text | EXI+MCR: V32B
EXI+MRR: 14400 | + +Unless otherwise noted in this appendix, any valid individual V.250 command, information text or result code may be encapsulated as a V.25 *bis* message. The V.250 command may include any necessary parameter values, of numeric, string or compound type. + +## III.3 Applicable V.250 commands + +See Table III.2. + +**Table III.2/V.250 – V.250 commands for use in V.25 *bis* DCE** + +| Name | Type | Reference | Description | +|-------|-----------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------| +| &C | Parameter | 6.2.8 | Circuit 109 (Received line signal detector) behaviour | +| &F | Action | 6.1.2 | Set to factory-defined configuration | +| +GCAP | Action | 6.1.9 | Request complete capabilities list | +| +GMI | Action | 6.1.4 | Request manufacturer identification | +| +GMM | Action | 6.1.5 | Request model identification | +| +GMR | Action | 6.1.6 | Request revision identification | +| +GOI | Action | 6.1.8 | Request global object identification | +| +GSN | Action | 6.1.7 | Request product serial number identification | +| +GCI | Parameter | 6.1.10 | Country of installation | +| +MA | Parameter | 6.4.2 | Modulation automode control | +| +MR | Parameter | 6.4.3 | Modulation reporting control | +| +MS | Parameter | 6.4.1 | Modulation selection | +| L | Parameter | 6.3.13 | Monitor speaker loudness | +| M | Parameter | 6.3.14 | Monitor speaker mode | +| S6 | Parameter | 6.3.9 | Pause before blind dialling | +| S7 | Parameter | 6.3.10 | Connection completion timeout | +| S10 | Parameter | 6.3.12 | Automatic disconnect delay | +| Z | Action | 6.1.1 | Reset to default configuration | + +All other V.250 commands are either not applicable or reserved for future study. + +## III.4 Applicable V.250 responses + +See Table III.3. + +**Table III.3/V.250 – V.250 commands for use in V.25 *bis* DCE** + +| Name | Type | Reference | Description | +|-----------------|---------------------|------------------|-----------------------------| +| +MCR: | Intermediate result | 6.4.3 | DCE-DCE carrier report | +| +MRR: | Intermediate result | 6.4.3 | DCE-DCE carrier rate report | +| +GMI response | Information text | 6.1.4 | Mfg ID | +| +GMM response | Information text | 6.1.5 | Model ID | +| +GMR response | Information text | 6.1.6 | Revision ID | +| +GOI response | Information text | 6.1.8 | Object ID | +| +GSN response | Information text | 6.1.7 | Serial number | +| +GCAP response | Information text | 6.1.9 | Capabilities | + +All other V.250 indications are either not applicable or reserved for future study. + + + +# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.251-199608-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.251-199608-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f2c8f883f498b7151b4556d8564c9bacbd19d30 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.251-199608-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,649 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.251 + +(02/98) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Control procedures + +# --- Procedure for DTE-controlled call negotiation + +ITU-T Recommendation V.251 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +## ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | +| Modems on digital circuits | V.300–V.399 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +## **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION V.251** + +# **PROCEDURE FOR DTE-CONTROLLED CALL NEGOTIATION** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation defines means for use in DTE control of V.8 and V.8 *bis* call negotiation. + +### **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.251 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 16 (1997-2000) and was approved and published as V.25 *ter* Annex A under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on 11 July 1997. It was then renumbered as V.251 under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on 6 February 1998, without further modification. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation the term *recognized operating agency (ROA)* includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms *Administration*, *ROA* and *public correspondence* are defined in the *Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992)*. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +ITU 2000 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Introduction and scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 References ..... | 1 | +| 3 Functions ..... | 2 | +| 4 Definitions and conventions ..... | 2 | +| 5 Commands ..... | 3 | +| 5.1 V.8 and V.8 bis operation controls, +A8E ..... | 3 | +| 5.2 Send V.8 menu signals ..... | 5 | +| 5.3 Send V.8 bis signal and/or message(s) ..... | 5 | +| 6 V.8 signal indications ..... | 6 | +| 6.1 CI signal indication, +A8I ..... | 6 | +| 6.2 Calling tone indication, +A8C ..... | 6 | +| 6.3 Answer signal indication, +A8A ..... | 7 | +| 6.4 V.8 negotiation complete, +A8J ..... | 8 | +| 6.5 V.8 menu report, +A8M ..... | 8 | +| 6.6 V.8 bis signal and message reporting ..... | 8 | +| 7 V.8 origination procedures ..... | 9 | +| 7.1 Configuration before the Dial command ..... | 9 | +| 7.2 Operation after dialling is completed ..... | 9 | +| 7.3 Answering signal detection ..... | 9 | +| 7.4 V.8 abort ..... | 9 | +| 7.5 CM signal generation ..... | 10 | +| 7.6 JM signal detection ..... | 10 | +| 7.7 Transition to communications ..... | 10 | +| 8 V.8 Answer procedures ..... | 10 | +| 8.1 Configuration before the Answer command ..... | 10 | +| 8.2 Operation after the Answer command ..... | 10 | +| 8.3 Calling signal detection ..... | 11 | +| 8.4 JM signal generation ..... | 11 | +| 8.5 V.8 abort ..... | 11 | +| 8.6 Transition to communications ..... | 11 | +| 9 V.8 bis procedures ..... | 12 | +| 9.1 Initiation ..... | 12 | +| 9.2 Reception ..... | 12 | + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 9.3 Transmission ..... | 12 | +| 9.4 Termination..... | 12 | +| 10 Sample sessions ..... | 12 | +| 10.1 V.8 origination, connect as V.34 transmit and receive data ..... | 13 | +| 10.2 V.8 answer, preconfigure for facsimile, but adaptively connect as a V.34 data
modem ..... | 14 | +| 10.3 V.8 bis sample session, based on Figure II.4/V.8 bis ..... | 14 | + +## Recommendation V.251 + +# PROCEDURE FOR DTE-CONTROLLED CALL NEGOTIATION + +(Geneva, 1998) + +## 1 Introduction and scope + +Recommendation V.8 is standardized for use in negotiating the call type at the beginning of a PSTN call. Recommendation V.8 *bis* is standardized for use in negotiating the call type during a PSTN call. They provide means to select amongst several single media or multimedia operating modes. + +- data modem (V-Series modems); +- text telephone (Recommendation V.18); +- send G3 facsimile (from calling terminal); +- receive G3 facsimile (polling); +- simple voice telephony; +- analog simultaneous Voice and data; +- digital simultaneous Voice and data; +- multimedia terminal (e.g. Recommendation H.324). + +Means are defined in this Recommendation for use in DTE control of V.8 and V.8 *bis* call negotiation. + +These means are designed so that the negotiation decisions are made in the DTE, so that compliant DCE do not need modification each time V.8 or V.8 *bis* code points are added or modified in other ways. + +## 2 References + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 *bis* (1998), *Procedures for the identification and selection of common modes of operation between data circuit-terminating equipments (DCEs) and between data terminal equipments (DTEs) over the public switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.25 (1996), *Automatic answering equipment and general procedures for automatic calling equipment on the general switched telephone network including procedures for disabling of echo control devices for both manually and automatically established calls.* + +## 3 Functions + +A DCE compliant with this annex shall provide the following functions: + +- a) accept DTE preconfiguration command before call establishment; +- b) provide necessary V.8 physical layer functions, including ANSam and V.21 modem; +- c) provide indications to the DTE for detection of remote V.8 signals (ANSam, CI, CM, JM, CJ), V.25 signals (CT, T.30 CNG) and relevant sigA and sigC signals (e.g. T.30 Ch2 flags); +- d) accept V.8 signals from the remote station, and convert them to hexadecimal octet coding for presentation to the DTE; +- e) accept V.8 signal octets in hexadecimal octet coding from the DTE and convert them to V.8 format for transmission; +- f) return to Command State after CJ transmission, detection or failure detection, so that DTE can take timely action; +- g) accept V.8 *bis* signal codes and V.8 *bis* message octets in hexadecimal octet coding from the DTE and convert them to V.8 *bis* format for transmission; +- h) detect V.8 *bis* signals and messages from the remote station, and convert them to the appropriate signal codes and hexadecimal octet coding for presentation to the DTE. + +## 4 Definitions and conventions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms: + +**4.1 hexadecimal octet coding:** Hexadecimal octet coding is a means for representing a string of octets as a string of hexadecimal digits, with two digits representing each octet. + +Each octet is issued by the DTE or DCE in the same time sequence as transmitted on the GSTN line, with no intervening characters. + +For each octet, the 8-bit sequence is encoded as two hexadecimal digits. Bit 0 is the first transmitted; bit 7 is the last. + +Bits 7-4 are encoded as the first hexadecimal digit, with Bit 7 as MSB and Bit 4 as LSB. Bits 3-0 are encoded as the second hexadecimal digit, with Bit 3 as MSB and Bit 0 as LSB. + +Examples: + +| Octet bit pattern
(time order) | Hexadecimal
coding | T.50 codes | +|-------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------| +| 00011011 | D8 | 4/4, 3/8 | +| 11100100 | 27 | 3/2, 3/7 | +| 10000011 10100010 11001000 00001001 | C1451390 | 4/3, 3/1, 3/4, 3/5, 3/1, 3/3, 3/9, 3/0 | + +**4.2 hexadecimal octet sequence:** A hexadecimal octet sequence is an even number of hexadecimal digits, terminated by a (T.50 0/13) character. + +**4.3 V.8 signal format:** There are three V.8 signals that include strings of octets: CI, CM and JM. In these signals, the DCE transmits a repeating pattern including 10 bits of 1 (mark idle) followed by a synchronization signal and one or more octets; see Tables 1/V.8 to 6/V.8. + +**4.4 V.8 *bis* signal and message format:** All V.8 *bis* signals consist of a dual tone followed by a single tone; see 7.1/V.8 *bis*. All V.8 *bis* messages consist of one or two HDLC frames carried on V.21 (H) modulation; see 7.2/V.8 *bis*. + +## 5 Commands + +### 5.1 V.8 and V.8 *bis* operation controls, +A8E + +Write Syntax: +A8E=,,[,][,][,] + +Valid Values: see Table 1 below + +Default values: 1,1,,1,"","" + +#### Description + +This command is defined for two conditions: as a parameter while the DCE is on-hook, and as an action command while the DCE is off-hook. If enabled, V.8 negotiation does not preclude simultaneous implementation of other negotiation means (e.g. Recommendation V.8 *bis*, Recommendation V.18, Annex A/V.32 *bis*). + +This command is a compound parameter if issued while the DCE is on-hook, used to precondition V.8 and V.8 *bis* originating and answering operation. It is issued by the DTE before the Dial (D) or Answer (A) command, regardless of the state of the +FCLASS parameter. + +This command is an action command if issued while the DCE is off-hook, to (re)start V.8 or V.8 *bis* negotiation. For example, if initial V.8 negotiation failed, but subsequent T.30 negotiation indicated V.8 capability, this command may be used to initiate V.8 negotiation. + +The subparameters are defined as follows: + +**Table 1/V.251 – V.8 operation control subparameters** + +| Values | Description | +|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| =0 | Disable V.8 origination negotiation | +| =1 | Enable DCE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation | +| =2 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation, send V.8 CI only | +| =3 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation, send 1100 Hz CNG only | +| =4 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation, send 1300 Hz CT only | +| =5 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation, send no tones | +| =6 | Enable DCE-controlled V.8 origination negotiation, issue +A8x indications | +| =0 | Disable V.8 answer negotiation | +| =1 | Enable DCE-controlled V.8 answer negotiation | +| =2 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 answer negotiation, send ANSam | +| =3 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 answer negotiation, send no signal | +| =4 | Disable DTE-controlled V.8 answer negotiation, send ANS | +| =5 | Enable DCE-controlled V.8 answer negotiation, issue +A8x indications | +| =X..Y | Set the V.8 CI signal call function to the hexadecimal octet value X..Y | +| =0 | Disable V.8 bis negotiation | +| =1 | enable DCE-controlled V8 bis negotiation | +| =2 | Enable DTE-controlled V.8 bis negotiation | +| =
"" | Set to alternative list of call function "option bit" values that the answering DCE shall accept from the caller | +| =
"" | Set to alternative list of protocol "option bit" values that the answering DCE shall accept from the caller | + +For subparameters , and , values of 0 disable the corresponding feature. Values of 1 enable the feature, with operation controlled by the DCE, based implicitly on manufacturer-determined procedures and on previous configuration commands. The ATD and ATA commands behave as specified in 6.3.1 and 6.3.5, respectively, and +A8n indications are not generated by the DCE. For example, a DCE configured with +FCLASS=0 gets V.8 CI, CM and JM information from the settings of the +MS, +ES, +DS, +MV18S parameters in this Recommendation. Similarly, a DCE configured with +FCLASS=1.0 gets some CI, CM and JM information from the +F34 parameter (Annex B/T.31). + +For subparameter values =6 and =5, the +A8I, +A8C, +A8A, +A8J, and +A8M indications are issued during the course of the V.8 session to notify the DTE when the relevant V.8 signals are received. The DCE control the V.8 session, however, and the +A8M command is not used. + +The subparameter setting is used when =5. The subparameter is set to a string, consisting of an alternative list of call function "option bit" values that the answering DCE shall accept from the caller; for example, "2,6" for V.18 and data. If the caller transmits a call function of either the preferred value, or a value from this list, the answerer shall respond with a JM set to the value received from the caller. If a different call function is received, the DCE shall transmit a JM with the call function set to the preferred value, with the modulation bits set to zero (per Recommendation V.8). + +The range of valid option bit values depends on the extension octet capabilities of the DCE. Values 0-6 correspond to the setting of the b5-b7 bits in a basic (non-extended) call function octet, e.g. a value of 6 corresponds to Transmit and Receive data. Values 7-38 correspond to the use of one extension octet, where bits b5-b7 in the basic octet all set to one. + +Each extension octet has five bits available for expressing category values. Thus, values 39-1062 correspond to the use of two extension octets, constructed by considering b0 of the first extension octet to be the least significant bit of a ten-bit number, with b7 of the second extension octet as the most significant bit; this ten-bit number is then offset by 39 so as not to conflict with the single-extension-octet values. This process may be extended for additional call function extension octets. + +The preferred call function option bit value is determined by DCE configuration. For example, it is equal to 4 if +FCLASS=1.0. + +The function of the subparameter is identical to , except it applies to the protocol category. See Table 2. + +**Table 2/V.251 – V.8 operation control read and test** + +| Command | DCE action | +|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| +A8E? | Report current values of subparameters | +| +A8E=? | Report supported ranges of values:
(range of supported values), (range of supported values), (maximum size of v8cf in octets), (range of supported values), (range of supported cfrange option bit values), (range of supported protrange option bit values) | + +#### *Implementation* + +V-Series DCEs implementing this Recommendation shall support at least one of these subparameter values: =(2-6), =(2-5), or =2. + +NOTE – The DCE shall return ERROR if the DTE attempts to enable DTE control of V.8 simultaneous with DCE control of V.8 *bis*. + +Example usage is shown in clause 10. + +### 5.2 Send V.8 menu signals + +Syntax: +A8M= + +#### *Description* + +This command directs the DCE to send a V.8 CM or JM signal using the specified hexadecimal coded string. If the DCE can decode the menu octet string, and if it cannot implement a specified feature, the DCE shall report an ERROR final result code, but stay in V.8 operation awaiting another command. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of Recommendation V.8. + +### 5.3 Send V.8 *bis* signal and/or message(s) + +Syntax: +A8T=[,<1st message>][,<2nd message>][,][,][,] + +#### *Description* + +The command directs the DCE to transmit a V.8 *bis* signal and/or message. The first subparameter selects the V.8 *bis* signal (see Tables 1-3/V.8 *bis*). Values of 0 correspond to no signal sent. The hexadecimal coded messages, if provided, are used to generate V.8 *bis* messages. + +Subparameter values (see Table 3): + +**Table 3/V.251 – V.8 *bis* signal subparameter values** + +| Signal value | Description | +|--------------|----------------------------| +| 0 | None | +| 1 | Initiating Mre | +| 2 | Initiating MRd | +| 3 | Initiating CRe, low power | +| 4 | Initiating CRe, high power | +| 5 | Initiating CRd | +| 6 | Initiating Esi | +| 7 | Responding MRd, low power | +| 8 | Responding MRd, high power | +| 9 | Responding CRd | +| 10 | Responding Esr | + +The transmitted V.8 *bis* message frame(s) is specified as hexadecimal octet coded string (see 4.1). Additional messages are delimited by comma characters. Flag generation, flag transparency 0-bit insertion and FCS generation are performed by the DCE. If no data is provided by the DTE, no V.21 carrier is generated beyond that used in segment 2. For two concatenated messages, the DCE shall insert the required preamble between the first and second messages. + +Subparameter directs the DCE to search for specified V.8 *bis* signals. A value of zero enables detection of initiating signals; a value of one enables detection of responding signals; a value of two enables detection of both signals. + +Subparameter , if set to 1, directs the DCE to search for V.8 *bis* messages. A value of zero disables detection of the messages. Note that detection of an ES signal automatically conditions the DCE to look for an immediately subsequent V.8 *bis* message regardless of the setting of ; see 9.2 + +Subparameter , if set to 1, directs the DCE to insert a 1.5 second delay between the transmitted V.8 *bis* signal and the subsequent V.8 *bis* message, if any. + +Read Syntax: +A8T? + +The DCE shall respond with the following information text: + ++A8T: ,,,,, + +Test Syntax: +A8T=? + +The DCE shall report: (0-10),(max length of message 1),(max length of message 2),(range of supported sig\_en values),(0-1),(0-1). + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this command is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of Recommendation V.8 *bis*. + +## **6 V.8 signal indications** + +### **6.1 CI signal indication, +A8I** + +Format: +A8I: + +#### *Description* + +This indication is issued by an answering DCE, if +A8E, ≠ 0, to indicate detection of a V.8 CI signal, and report the recovered Call Function octet(s). Value is a hexadecimal code octet representation of those Call Function octet(s). +A8I:0 indicates that the DCE timed out waiting for CI. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is optional. + +### **6.2 Calling tone indication, +A8C** + +Format: +A8C: + +#### *Description* + +This indication is issued by an answering DCE, if +A8E, ≠ 0, to indicate detection of 1100 Hz or 1300 Hz calling tones, or sigC signals, as defined in Recommendations T.30, V.8 and in V.25. The following +A8C: values are defined (see Table 4): + +**Table 4/V.251 – Calling tone indication values** + +| Signal value | Description | +|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Indicates that the DCE concluded answer tone transmission without reporting detection of any calling tone | +| 1 | Indicates a CNG tone (1100 Hz) | +| 2 | Indicates 1300 Hz V.25 data modem calling tone | +| 3 | Indicates sigC signal: V.32/V.32 bis AA tone | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of V.8, or for DCEs supporting the =5 subparameter value in the +A8E command. Individual values 1, 2 and 3 shall be implemented if the DCE supports detection of the relevant signal. + +### **6.3 Answer signal indication, +A8A** + +Format: +A8A: + +#### *Description* + +This indication is issued by a calling DCE, if +A8E ≠0, to indicate detection of an answering signal. The codes are (see Table 5): + +**Table 5/V.251 – Answering signal indication values** + +| Signal value | Description | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Indicates that the DCE timed out waiting for an answering signal | +| 1 | Indicates V.8 ANSam signal (2100 Hz with amplitude modulation) | +| 2 | Indicates V.25 answer tone (2100 Hz) | +| 3 | Indicates V.25 answer tone with phase reversals (Note) | +| 4 | Indicates sigA signal: V.21 Ch2 with flags (e.g. T.30 control preamble) | +| 5 | Indicates sigA signal: V.22 bis USB1 signal | +| 6 | Indicates sigA signal: V.32 bis AC signal | +| 7 | Indicates sigA signal: V.34 ToneA signal | +| Other values are reserved for other answering signal detection indication.
NOTE – If the DCE cannot distinguish between V.25 answer tones with and without phase reversals, the DCE shall report value 2 for both signals. The presence or absence of phase reversals in V.25 ANS is intended to signal GSTN echo control equipment and may not be a reliable indicator of the subsequent V-series modulation. | | + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of V.8, or for DCEs supporting the =6 subparameter value in the +A8E command. Individual values 1-7 shall be implemented if the DCE supports detection of the relevant signal. + +### 6.4 V.8 negotiation complete, +A8J + +Format: +A8J: + +#### *Description* + +This indication is issued by either DCE, if DTE control of V.8 negotiation is enabled, when the negotiation is complete and CJ is sent or detected. An answering DCE will issue this on detection of CJ from the remote terminal. A calling DCE will send a CJ signal to the remote terminal at the same time as a +A8J indication. +A8J:1 indicates CJ; +A8J:0 indicates that the DCE timed out waiting for a CJ signal. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of V.8, or for DCEs supporting the =6 or =5 subparameter values in the +A8E command. + +### 6.5 V.8 menu report, +A8M + +Format: +A8M: + +#### *Description* + +This indication is issued by either DCE, during V.8 negotiation, to indicate the contents of a valid received CM or JM signal. A +A8M:0 indicates that the DCE timed out waiting for a CM or JM signal. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of V.8, or for DCEs supporting the =6 or =5 subparameter values in the +A8E command. + +### 6.6 V.8 bis signal and message reporting + +Syntax: +A8R:[,<1st message>][,<2nd message>] + +#### *Description* + +If enabled by +A8E=,,[=2] command, the DCE shall monitor for V.8 *bis* signals and messages, and use the +A8R: intermediate result code response to report that signal. + +The V.8 *bis* signal, if detected, is indicated using a value defined in Table 3 above. Values of 4 and 8 are not reported, i.e. the DCE is not expected to discern the power level of received CRe and MRd signals. If a V.8 *bis* message is detected without a preceding V.8 *bis* signal, the preamble is reported as a 0 value. + +The contents of valid V.8 *bis* message(s), if detected, are reported using hexadecimal octet coded string(s) (see 4.1). Flag detection and consumption, flag transparency 0-bit deletion and FCS checking are performed by the DCE. The DCE shall not report invalid messages (e.g. bad FCS). If two consecutive messages are detected but the first is invalid, the DCE shall indicate this with no characters between the first and second comma (e.g. +A8R:< signal>,<2nd message>). + +Two concatenated V.8 *bis* messages are reported with two consecutive indications. + +#### *Implementation* + +Implementation of this indication is mandatory for V-Series DCEs supporting DTE control of Recommendation V.8 *bis*. + +## 7 V.8 origination procedures + +The procedures in this clause apply if +A8E has values other than 0 or 1. + +### 7.1 Configuration before the Dial command + +Before the Dial command, the DCE must be enabled by setting the +A8E to a value other than 0 or 1, and setting to a valid Call Function value (see Table 3/V.8). If is not valid, the DCE may still use it to generate a V.8 CI signal, but the remote terminal is unlikely to recognize it. + +### 7.2 Operation after dialling is completed + +After the Dial command has finished sending the dialling strings, the DCE shall condition its receiver to detect ANS, ANSam, or sigAs that are characteristic of acceptable modes of operation, and wait silent as specified in Recommendation V.8 or in national regulations. If +A8E = 2,, it shall then send a V.8 repeating CI signal, using the call function specified in . If +A8E = 3,, it shall then send a repeating CNG, as specified in Annex F/T.30. If +A8E = 4,, it shall then send the 1300 Hz calling tone specified in Recommendation V.25. + +### 7.3 Answering signal detection + +If ANSam is detected, the DCE shall stop transmitting the calling signal and report this to the DTE using the +A8A:1 indication (see 6.3). If ≠6, the DCE shall then issue an OK final result code after at least 1.0 s of ANSam has been detected without the presence of calling signal. + +The DCE shall then proceed to CM signal generation (see 7.5). + +NOTE – If it is unnecessary to allow for the disabling of network echo cancellers, the DCE may issue the OK final result code as soon as 0.5 s after the ANSam signal is first detected without the presence of calling signal, in accordance with 8.1.1/V.8. + +If no answering signal is detected, as determined by DCE S7 parameter time-out, the DCE shall stop transmitting calling signal, if any. If V.8 *bis* negotiation has also been enabled by setting ≠0, or the DCE is otherwise configured to remain off-hook, the DCE shall issue a +A8A:0 indication, an OK final result code, and remain off-hook. If =0 and the DCE not otherwise configured, the DCE shall issue a NO CARRIER result code and return on-hook. In either case, V.8 negotiation shall terminate, and no other +A8-type indications associated with such negotiations shall be issued. The DCE shall await further direction from the DTE (see 7.7). + +If an answering signal other than ANSam is detected, the DCE shall report this to the DTE using the +A8A indication (see 6.3). If ≠6, the DCE shall then issue an OK final result code, continue to transmit calling signal, if any, and await direction from the DTE (see 7.7). + +### 7.4 V.8 abort + +For DTE-controlled V.8 operation, up to the point of reception of a signal from the answering terminal, V.8 call establishment is an extension of the D command execution. After the +A8A indication and the OK result code are issued, D command execution is complete. + +V.8 negotiation during D command execution will terminate early if the DTE issues an any-key-abort to the DCE. In this case, the DCE action shall be the same as that described for the case of an S7 time-out in 7.3. + +### **7.5 CM signal generation** + +For DTE-controlled V.8 operation, if ANSam is detected, the +A8A:1 indication followed by the final result code prompts the DTE to send the V.8 CM signal octets, as a hexadecimal octet sequence preceded by the +A8M= command. The DCE shall send the resulting CM signal to the remote terminal and condition its receiver to detect JM and proceed to 7.6. + +For DCE-controlled operation with $\langle v8o \rangle \geq 6$ , the DCE shall not issue an OK final result code after the +A8A:1 indication, and shall transmit the CM without the need of a +A8M= command from the DTE. + +### **7.6 JM signal detection** + +If the DCE detects a valid JM signal, it shall deliver the JM signal to the DTE as a hexadecimal octet sequence within a +A8M: intermediate result code. If no valid JM signal is detected, as determined by DCE time-out, the DCE shall issue a +A8M:0 intermediate result code. + +If $\langle v8o \rangle \neq 6$ , the DCE shall follow +A8M intermediate result code with an OK final result code. + +The DCE shall continue to send CM, and proceed to 7.7. + +### **7.7 Transition to communications** + +Unless previously configured by the DTE, at the OK final result code, the DTE shall issue appropriate +FCLASS and other configuration and operation commands. If V.8 negotiation was successfully initiated and a valid JM signal was received, this configuration shall be in accordance with the received JM, followed by the appropriate action command to begin operation in the selected modulation mode. For data or V.18 operation, +FCLASS=0; the first action command is ATO. + +If transmitting CM, upon receipt of ATO or other appropriate action command, the DCE shall complete V.8 negotiation by halting CM transmission, transmitting CJ, delaying $75 \pm 5$ ms, and transmitting the appropriate sigC signal in accordance with 8.1.2/V.8. + +Simultaneous with the transmission of CJ, the DCE shall issue a +A8J:1 information text. Typically, this will be issued before other information text strings reporting modulation type, error control type, etc., and before a result code such as CONNECT or NO CARRIER. Once the +A8J string is issued, DTE-controlled V.8 operation is complete and the DTE shall issue no further +A8-type indications associated with such operation. + +If the received JM signal had all the modulation category option bits set to zero, the DCE shall issue an OK result code after the +A8J:1 indication and remain off-hook. + +## **8 V.8 Answer procedures** + +The procedures in this subclause apply if +A8E $\langle v8a \rangle$ has values other than 0 or 1. + +### **8.1 Configuration before the Answer command** + +Before the Answer command, the DCE must be enabled by setting the +A8E $\langle v8a \rangle$ to values other than 0 or 1. + +### **8.2 Operation after the Answer command** + +After the DCE has accepted the Answer command and connected to the GSTN, the DCE shall condition its receiver to detect V.8 CI and CM signals, other V.25 signals, T.30 CNG signals, and sigAs characteristics of acceptable modes of operation, e.g. the V.32 AA signal. The DCE shall transmit no signal for at least 0.4 s. If $\langle v8a \rangle \geq 1$ , the DCE shall commence transmitting ANSam. + +### 8.3 Calling signal detection + +If V.8 CI is detected, the DCE shall report this to the DTE using the +A8I: indication with call function (see 6.1). If =2, the DCE shall commence the transmission of ANSam. + +The DTE may decode the hexadecimal octet sequence, as defined in Recommendation V.8, to determine the requested call function. If the DTE cannot accommodate the requested call function, the DTE may abort the V.8 negotiation by issuing an any-key-abort to the DCE (see 8.5). + +If a 1100 Hz T.30 CNG tone or a 1300 Hz V.25 data calling tone or other suitable sigC signal is detected, the DCE shall continue transmitting ANSam if =2 or commence transmitting ANSam if =3, issue a +A8C: code, an OK final result code, and wait for DTE command. + +If the DCE detects a valid CM signal, it shall report the CM signal to the DTE as a hexadecimal octet sequence, preceded by a +A8M: prefix, and continue to transmit ANSam. The DCE shall issue an OK final result code and proceed to 8.4. + +If the DCE fails to detect a valid calling signal before ANSam transmission is complete or before an any-key-abort is received, it shall issue a +A8C:0 intermediate result code, issue an OK final result code, and wait for DTE command (see 8.6). + +### 8.4 JM signal generation + +Unless previously configured by the DTE, at the OK final result code, the DTE shall issue appropriate +FCLASS and other configuration commands corresponding to the transmitted JM. If ≠5, the DCE shall await a +A8M command from the DTE before transmitting the specified JM; the DCE shall then issue an OK final result code. + +With the commencement of JM transmission, the DCE shall proceed to 8.6. + +### 8.5 V.8 abort + +Until the detection of a calling signal or completion of answer tone transmission, V.8 call negotiation is an extension of the A command execution. After the OK final result code is issued, A command execution is complete. + +The DTE may terminate the A command execution prematurely with an any-key-abort. DCE behaviour shall be as specified in 8.3. + +### 8.6 Transition to communications + +At the OK final result code, the DTE shall issue the appropriate operation command to transition to Data State. If ≠5, the DTE may issue the operation command on the same command line as the +A8M command to send JM, in order to insure that the DCE is ready to complete the actions required after detection of CJ, and/or to increase system robustness by configuring the DCE for simultaneous detection of CJ and the appropriate SigC. + +For data or V.18 operation, +FCLASS=0, the first action command is ATO. + +If the negotiation result is T.30 facsimile operation, the DTE shall issue the appropriate action commands as defined in Recommendation T.31 or T.32. + +If a V.8 CJ signal is detected, the DCE shall indicate this to the DTE with the +A8J:1 intermediate result code. + +If the transmitted JM signal had all the modulation category option bits set to zero, the DCE shall issue an OK result code after the +A8J:1 indication and remain off-hook. + +## 9 V.8 *bis* procedures + +The procedures in this subclause apply if +A8E has a value of 2. + +### 9.1 Initiation + +The +A8E=,, command with value of 2 commences V.8 *bis* operation under DTE control, directing the DCE to begin listening for incoming initiating V.8 *bis* signals. Note that capable DCE may accept this command on-hook or off-hook, in any relevant +FCLASS setting. The DCE may be reconfigured from listening for initiating V.8 *bis* signals to listening for responding signals, or vice versa, with the +A8T command. Also, V.8 *bis* and V.8 operation may be initiated simultaneously. + +### 9.2 Reception + +Detection of any V.8 *bis* signal shall be reported using the +A8R: response. Detection of an ES signal shall cause the DCE to prepare to report a subsequent V.8 *bis* message, if any, to the DTE. The contents of this message shall be reported in the same +A8R intermediate result codes used to report the signal. At the conclusion of the V.8 *bis* message, or in the absence of such a message after the ES signal, the DCE does not report the contents of any V.21 (H) messages until commanded otherwise by the DTE. + +### 9.3 Transmission + +The DTE shall use the +A8T (see 5.3) command to transmit a V.8 *bis* signal and/or message. + +According to the setting of the and subparameters, at the conclusion of the transmission, the DCE shall condition itself to report V.8 *bis* signals and/or messages received from the remote station. + +Signal and/or message detection can be reconfigured at a later time by issuing a +A8T command with =0 and the <1st message> and <2nd message> subparameter empty. + +NOTE – If the DCE is configured to detect the same type of signals that it is transmitting, the DCE may detect the echo of that signal and issue an erroneous +A8R response. Examples: + +- a) If the +A8T command is used to generate V.8 *bis* initiating signals ( values 1-6) and equals 0 or 2. +- b) If the +A8T command is used to generate V.8 *bis* responding signals ( values 7-10) and equals 1 or 2. + +### 9.4 Termination + +The DTE shall use the +A8E=,,0 command to terminate V.8 *bis* monitoring mode. Since Recommendation V.8 *bis* is used to negotiate for operating modes, the DTE is responsible to issue necessary DCE configuration and operation commands (e.g. AT+FCLASS=0; .... ; O) in time for the DCE to be correctly configured to execute any required actions. + +## 10 Sample sessions + +In these examples, actions between the DTE and DCE on both the originating and answering side are illustrated. + +For purposes of some examples, it is assumed that the V.8 call function codes for originator transmit and receive T.30 facsimile are 10000001 and 10000101 respectively. + +Sample session 10.2 is used to illustrate an answering terminal preconfigured for fax operation, but capable of fax or data, and adaptively switches to data. + +### 10.1 V.8 origination, connect as V.34 transmit and receive data + +| DTE commands and data | DCE indications and data | DCE actions | Remote terminal actions | Notes | +|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| AT+A8E=5 | OK | | | Enable DTE V.8 control, no calling tones | +| AT+FCLASS=0 | OK | Select Class 0 | | Configure for data | +| ATD | +A8A:1
OK | Off-hook, dial

Detect ANSam | Detect ringing answer

Send ANSam | | +| AT+A8M=C14513902A | +A8M:C14513902A
OK | Send CM

Detect JM | Detect CM
Stop ANSam
Send JM | Indicate Rec. V.34, Rec. V.32 bis , Rec. V.22 bis , Rec. V.22 and Rec. V.21, with LAPM. Remote selects Rec. V.34 with LAPM | +| AT+A8M=C1453180 | +A8M:A145
OK | Send CM

Detect JM | Detect CM
Stop ANSam
Send JM | | +| ATO | +A8J:1
+MCR: V34
+MRR: 28 800
+ER: LAPM
+DR: V42B
CONNECT | Send CJ
Negotiate V.34 channel rates, protocols, etc. | Detect CJ
Negotiate V.34 channel rates, protocols, etc. | Indicate Rec. V.34, Rec. V.32 bis , Rec. V.22 bis , Rec. V.22 and Rec. V.21. Remote selects Rec. V.34, report Rec. V.34 at 28 800, Rec. V.42 and Rec. V.42 bis | +| ATO | +A8J:1
+MCR: V34
+MRR: 28 800
+ER: LAPM
+DR: V42B
CONNECT | Send CJ
Negotiate V.34 channel rates, protocols, etc. | Detect CJ
Negotiate V.34 channel rates, protocols, etc. | Report Rec. V.34 at 28 800, Rec. V.42 and Rec. V.42 bis | +| exchange data | | | | | + +### 10.2 V.8 answer, preconfigure for facsimile, but adaptively connect as a V.34 data modem + +| DTE commands and data | DCE indications and data | DCE actions | Remote terminal actions | Notes | +|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------| +| AT+A8E=,2 | OK | | | Enable ANSam | +| AT+FCLASS=1.0 | OK | Select Class 1 | | Preconfigure for FAX | +| | RING | Detect ringing | Dial | | +| ATA | +A8I:C1
A8M:C14513902A
OK | Off-hook
Send ANSam
Detect CI
Detect CM | Send CI
Detect ANSam
Send CM | Remote terminal called in requesting a data connection | +| AT+FCLASS=0[; any configuration. commands....] | OK | Reconfigure for data operation | | | +| AT+A8M=C14513902A:O | +A8J:1
+MCR: V34
+MRR: 28 800
+ER: LAPM
+DR: V42B
CONNECT | Send JM
Detect CJ
Negotiate V.34 duplex channel rate | Detect JM
Send CJ
Stop CJ
Negotiate V.34 duplex channel rate | | +| exchange data | | | | | + +### 10.3 V.8 bis sample session, based on Figure II.4/V.8 bis + +| Initiating DTE commands and data | Initiating DCE indications and data | Responding DTE commands and data | Responding DCE indications and data | Notes | +|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | | | | Voice call previously established | +| AT+A8E=,,,2 | OK | AT+A8E=,,,2 | OK | Configure for Rec. V.8 bis | +| AT+A8T=5,,,1,1 | OK | | | Send CR d at -5 dBm, look for responding signal (e.g. CR) or message (e.g. CL, CLR) | +| | | | +A8R:5 | Indicate received CR d | +| | | AT+A8T=0,128380808306D009C4,0,1 | OK | Send CL, indicate V.8 and short V.8 capability; no network type; data with Rec. V.34, Rec. V.42, Rec. V.42 bis; Rec. V.70-series with Rec. V.34, Rec. V.42 bis. Look for initiating signals (none expected) and messages (e.g. MS) | +| | +A8R:0,128380808306D009C4 | | | Indicate received CL | + +| Initiating
DTE commands
and data | Initiating
DCE indications
and data | Responding
DTE commands
and data | Responding
DCE indications
and data | Notes | +|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------| +| AT+A8T=0,1181
80808209C4 | OK | | | Send MS with Rec. V.34
Rec. V.70-series selected,
no ACK | +| | | | +A8R:0,118280
808209C4 | Receive MS | +| | | | | | +| | | | | | +| AT+A8E=1;D | | AT+A8E=,1;A | | Go to data mode; with
Rec. V.8 | +| | CONNECT | | CONNECT | Exchange data | + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects | +| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.252-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.252-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78378c9b99932807f325d8bf790210dc5ca7705d --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.252-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,1400 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt symbol below it.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt symbol below it. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +**ITU-T** + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +**V.252** + +(02/98) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Control procedures + +--- + +**Procedure for control of V.70 and H.324 +terminals by a DTE** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.252 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION V.252** + +## **PROCEDURE FOR CONTROL OF V.70 AND H.324 TERMINALS BY A DTE** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation describes the operation of the DCE/DTE interface in which either an H.324 entity or a V.70 DSVD entity is implemented in the DCE. The V.70 entity in the DCE comprises at least a V.76 multiplexer and the V.75 control unit. The H.324 entity in the DCE comprises at least an H.223 multiplexer and the H.245 control unit for H.324. Audio and video transducers and codecs, if present, are implemented in the DCE or in devices attached directly to the DCE. Commands and indications defined in this Recommendation are valid in FCLASS=17.0 or FCLASS=18.0. The availability of Class 17.0 in a DCE indicates that the DCE is capable of supporting the control functions of a V.70 DSVD device. The availability of Class 18.0 in a DCE indicates that the DCE is capable of supporting the control functions of an H.324 terminal. + +### **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.252 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 16 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 6th of February 1998. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +### NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +ITU 1998 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 Scope..... | 1 | +| 2 Control model ..... | 1 | +| 2.1 Device codes ..... | 2 | +| 3 Commands ..... | 3 | +| 3.1 Terminal configuration, +STC..... | 3 | +| 3.2 Close logical channel, +STH ..... | 4 | +| 3.3 Data configuration, +SDC ..... | 5 | +| 3.4 Audio transmit configuration, +SAC..... | 7 | +| 3.5 Audio receive mode +SAM ..... | 8 | +| 3.6 Video transmit configuration +SVC (Class 18 only)..... | 10 | +| 3.7 Video receive mode +SVM (Class 18 only) ..... | 11 | +| 3.8 Data indication reporting, +SDR ..... | 12 | +| 3.9 Audio indication reporting, +SARR..... | 13 | +| 3.10 Video indication reporting, +SVRR (Class 18 only) ..... | 13 | +| 3.11 Capabilities indication reporting, +SCRR ..... | 14 | +| 4 Additional commands ..... | 14 | +| 4.1 Set audio code, +VAC ..... | 14 | +| 4.2 Receive gain selection, +VGR..... | 15 | +| 4.3 Transmit gain selection, +VGT..... | 16 | +| 4.4 Beep tone duration timer, +VTD ..... | 17 | +| 4.5 DTMF and tone generation, +VTS ..... | 17 | +| 4.6 Ring local phone, +VRL..... | 19 | +| 4.7 Speakerphone ON/OFF, +VSP ..... | 20 | +| 4.8 Train acoustic echo-canceller, +VTA..... | 20 | +| 4.9 Train hybrid echo-canceller, +VTH..... | 21 | +| 4.10 Speakerphone configuration, +VDX..... | 21 | +| 4.11 Phone hookswitch status, +VPH..... | 22 | +| 4.12 Telephony port hook control, +VHC ..... | 22 | +| 5 Indications..... | 23 | +| 5.1 Remote terminal capabilities indications ..... | 23 | +| 5.1.1 Remote terminal capability table entry indications, +SRCV, +SRCA,
+SRCD..... | 24 | +| 5.1.2 Remote terminal simultaneous capability indication, +SRSC..... | 24 | + +| | Page | +|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 5.2 Data channel indication, +SDI..... | 24 | +| 5.3 Audio receive channel indication, +SAR..... | 25 | +| 5.4 Audio transmit channel indication, +SAT ..... | 25 | +| 5.5 Video receive channel indication, +SVR (Class 18 only) ..... | 25 | +| 5.6 Video transmit channel indication, +SVT (Class 18 only)..... | 25 | +| 6 Additional indications..... | 26 | +| 6.1 Audio code report, +VACR ..... | 26 | +| 6.2 Caller ID report, +VCIDR ..... | 26 | +| 6.3 DID report, +VDIDR ..... | 26 | +| 6.4 Simple telephony event report, +VTER..... | 26 | +| 7 In-band indications and commands ..... | 27 | +| 7.1 In-band indications..... | 27 | +| 7.2 In-band commands..... | 27 | +| 7.3 Remote DCE in-band commands and indications ..... | 28 | + +## Recommendation V.252 + +## PROCEDURE FOR CONTROL OF V.70 AND H.324 TERMINALS BY A DTE + +(Geneva, 1998) + +## 1 Scope + +This Recommendation describes the operation of the DCE/DTE interface in which either an H.324 entity or a V.70 DSVD entity is implemented in the DCE. The V.70 entity in the DCE comprises at least a V.76 multiplexer and the V.75 control unit. The H.324 entity in the DCE comprises at least an H.223 multiplexer and the H.245 control unit for H.324. Audio and video transducers and codecs, if present, are implemented in the DCE or in devices attached directly to the DCE. In the case of an H.324 DCE, if one or more data channels are present, one of them is assumed to terminate in the DTE. Commands and indications defined in this Recommendation are valid in FCLASS=17.0 and/or FCLASS=18.0. The availability of Class 17.0 in a DCE indicates that the DCE is capable of supporting the V.76 multiplexing and V.75 control functions of a V.70 DSVD device. The availability of Class 18.0 in a DCE indicates that the DCE is capable of supporting the H.223 multiplexing and H.245 control functions of an H.324 terminal. + +## 2 Control model + +Figure 1 is a block diagram of a typical Class 17 system: + +![Block diagram of a typical Class 17 system showing DTE and DCE components.](1c953f32bd34345dfd68fddf8a3736d6_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the control model for a Class 17 system, divided into two main sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) and DCE (Data Circuit-terminating Equipment). + +**DTE Section:** + +- Contains a **Data application** block and a **Control** block. +- The **Class 17 data and control** block is the central interface point for the DTE. + +**DCE Section:** + +- The **Class 17 data and control** block connects to a **V.76 mux** (multiplexer) and a **V.75** control unit. +- The **V.76 mux** is connected to **Annex A G.729** and a **Signal converter**. +- The **Signal converter** is connected to a **GSTN** (Global System for Mobile Communications) network, represented by a telephone icon. +- A **Control** line with a downward arrow is shown below the **Class 17 data and control** block. + +The diagram is labeled **T1602540-97** at the bottom right. + +Block diagram of a typical Class 17 system showing DTE and DCE components. + +Figure 1/V.252 – V.70 DSVD DCE + +Figure 2 is a block diagram of a typical Class 18 system: + +![Block diagram of a typical Class 18 system showing DTE and DCE components.](2ee59e629035d641140e55f4d215b0d7_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates a Class 18 system architecture. It is divided into two main sections: DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) on the left and DCE (Data Circuit-terminating Equipment) on the right. In the DTE section, there is a 'Data application' block and a 'Control' block. Both are connected to a central 'Class 18 data and control' block. This central block has a 'Control' output line pointing downwards. In the DCE section, there is a 'Video' block connected to the central block. Below the video path are three blocks: 'H.261', 'Data protocol', and 'H.245', all connected to a large central block labeled 'H.223'. To the right of the 'H.223' block is a 'Signal converter' block, which is connected to a 'G.723' block. The 'G.723' block is further connected to a telephone icon. A label 'GSTN' points to the 'Signal converter' block. The reference code 'T1602550-97' is located at the bottom right of the diagram. + +Block diagram of a typical Class 18 system showing DTE and DCE components. + +**Figure 2/V.252 – H.324 terminal with "data port"** + +The basic model of V.70/H.324 DCE control is that there are a number of named "devices" which are capable of sourcing or sinking audio, video, or data streams. These logical devices include physical media devices such as cameras, displays, microphones and speakers. All logical devices are assigned a one - or two-character device code. + +The DTE can control device characteristics and which devices are active on a given connection. The assignment of devices to specific V.76 or H.223 multiplexer channels, however, is the responsibility of the V.75 or H.245 control entity, respectively, in the DCE. + +### 2.1 Device codes + +Each logical device is assigned a one - or two-character "device code", as follows: + +**Table 1/V.252 – Device codes** + +| Device code | Logical device | +|-------------|-------------------------------------------| +| L | Local telephone port (see Note 1) | +| M0 | Internal microphone | +| M1 | External microphone | +| $M_n$ | $n = 2..255$ Additional microphones | +| S0 | Internal speaker | +| S1 | External speaker | +| $S_n$ | $n = 2..255$ Additional loudspeakers | +| H0 | External handset/headset | +| $H_n$ | $n = 1..255$ Additional handsets/headsets | +| C0 | Internal camera | +| C1 | External camera | +| $C_n$ | $n = 2..255$ Additional cameras | + +**Table 1/V.252 – Device codes (*end*)** + +| Device code | Logical device | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------| +| V0 | Internal video display device | +| V1 | External video display device | +| V n | n = 2..255 Additional video displays | +|

NOTE 1 – It may be possible in some DCE, by hardware strapping or other means outside the scope of this Recommendation, to configure the "L" local telephone port device to interconnect to either a local telephone device and appear as a PSTN telephone line (which would require the DCE to provide loop voltage, etc.) or to interconnect to a second PSTN telephone line and appear as a telephone device (which would require the DCE to provide loop supervision, ring detect, etc.).

NOTE 2 – It is intended that the device codes for non-video devices be identical to those defined in other functional classes, such as in Class 8.0.

NOTE 3 – Support for "L" and "R" suffixes for left and right identification can be added once they are supported by H.245 and V.75.

| | + +In addition, data channels are given a numeric identification label, with channel 0 being the "data port" channel connected to the DTE. Channel existence and source/sink device assignment may be performed prior to a connection, either by default or by configuration command. In this case, the DCE shall automatically negotiate such operation with the remote end at the commencement of a communication session. Alternately, channels and devices may be created and/or destroyed dynamically during a connection using the appropriate commands. + +## 3 Commands + +### 3.1 Terminal configuration, +STC + +#### Parameter + ++STC= "" + +#### Description + +This parameter is used to select the audio, video (for Class 18), and data devices that are to be used in a connection. If supported by the remote terminal, the specified devices shall be used. If issued during a connection, this is an action command that changes the configuration of the connection; in this case, the DCE shall return **ERROR** if the new configuration is not supported by the remote terminal (e.g., if an **OpenLogicalChannelReject** response is received from the remote terminal). + +Note also that, prior to the **ERROR** final result code, the DCE may issue information text as to the reason for the failure. This information text shall take the form of **+STC: FAIL **, where the **** parameter has the following value assignments: + +| <err_num> | Definition | +|------------------------|------------------------------| +| 0 | Syntax error | +| 1 | XID frame rejection | +| 2 | OpenLogicalChannel rejection | + +If issued during a connection, this shall cause the relevant channels to be established or released. Depending on the channel configuration and specific DCE implementation, this may be preceded by capability exchanges between the DCEs. If the channel indications defined in clause 5 are enabled, they are issued when the channels are opened or closed. + +#### **Defined values** + +A valid parameter value consists of a string, bounded by double quotes, of device codes as defined in 2.1, with the device codes separated by commas. + +#### **Default value** + +Default configuration is determined by the manufacturer. + +##### **Read syntax** + ++STC? + +In command state (i.e., not during a connection), the DCE shall return the current parameter setting, e.g.: + ++STC: "L,C0,V0,0" + +for a DCE configured for audio on the local telephone, transmit video from the internal camera, receive video to the internal display, and a data channel to the DTE. + +In on-line command state, the DCE shall return the current configuration in use on the connection. + +#### **Test syntax** + ++STC=? + +The DCE shall return information text indicating supported configurations. Lists of alternative devices which cannot be supported simultaneously may be enclosed in parentheses, e.g.: + ++STC: "(L,M0,M1) , (L,S0,S1) , (C0,C1) , (V0,V1) , 0" + +indicates the ability to support one audio transmit channel (from either local phone, or internal or external microphones), one audio receive channel, one video channel in each direction, and a data channel to the DTE. As another example, a DCE capable of supporting two duplex audio channel pairs, with one pair to the local phone, would return: + ++STC: "L, (M0,M1) , (S0,S1) , (C0,C1) , (V0,V1) , 0" + +More complex dependencies may be indicated by the DCE by returning multiple lines. + +### **3.2 Close logical channel, +STH** + +#### **Parameter** + ++STH="" + +#### **Description** + +This action command is issued during a connection to cause the specified channel(s) to be released. + +#### **Defined values** + +A valid parameter value consists of a string, bounded by double quotes, of device codes as defined in 2.1, with the device codes separated by commas. + +##### **Test syntax** + ++STH=? + +In on-line command state, the DCE shall return the current configuration in use on the connection, similar to the +STC? response, e.g.: + +``` ++STH: "L,C0,V0,0" +``` + +for a DCE configured for audio on the local telephone, transmit video from the internal camera, receive video to the internal display, and a data channel to the DTE. + +In command state (i.e., not during a connection), the DCE shall return ERROR. + +### 3.3 Data configuration, +SDC + +#### Parameter + +``` ++SDC=,,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,]]]]]]]]] +``` + +#### Description + +This parameter sets the preferred operating mode for duplex data channel . Data channel 0 is connected to the DTE port; other data channels may exist which terminate in the DCE. For data channel 0, the data application mode is communicated to the remote terminal, but the application itself is assumed to reside in the DTE. If the remote terminal is incapable of operating at the preferred mode, data channel operation may take place in another mode within the DCE's capability. + +This command serves to configure DCE capabilities exchanges, and may be issued prior to a connection to change the DCE from the default configuration, or during a connection prior to a +STC command. The subsequent +STC will then trigger a capabilities exchange. + +#### Defined values + +| | | | +|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| +| | Duplex data channel identifier (data ch. 0 is always connected to DTE) | | +| | Data application mode (for data ch. 0, these are assumed to run in the DTE): | | +| | 0 | Non-standard application | +| | 1 | T.120 | +| | 2 | Reserved | +| | 3 | User data | +| | 4 | T.84 | +| | 5 | T.434 | +| | 6 | H.224 | +| | 7 | ISO/IEC TR 9577 | +| | 8 | Reserved for future standardization | +| | Data protocol mode | | +| | Class 17 (V.70 DSVD) definitions | Class 18 (H.324) definitions | +| | 0 | Non-standard protocol | +| | 1 | Asynchronous ERM | +| | 2 | Asynchronous ERM w. V.42bis | +| | 3 | Asynchronous UNERM | +| | 4 | Reserved | +| | Network Layer Protocol Identifier data; hexadecimal coded octet string | | +| | A 32-bit integer in hexadecimal format defining a bit-mapped value with T.84 capabilities. Bit assignments are as follows: | | +| | 00001 | Unrestricted | +| | 00002 | QCIF | + +| | | +|-------|------------------| +| 00004 | CIF | +| 00008 | ccir601Seq | +| 00010 | ccir601Prog | +| 00020 | hdtvSeq | +| 00040 | hdtvProg | +| 00080 | g3FacsMh200x100 | +| 00100 | g3FacsMH200x200 | +| 00200 | g4FacsMMR200x100 | +| 00400 | g4FacsMMR200x200 | +| 00800 | jbig200x200Seq | +| 01000 | jbig200x200Progr | +| 02000 | jbig300x300Seq | +| 04000 | jbig300x300Progr | +| 08000 | digPhotoLow | +| 10000 | digPhotoMedSeq | +| 20000 | digPhotoMedProg | +| 40000 | digPhotoHighSeq | +| 80000 | digPhotoHighProg | + + Support for V.76 UIH frames for this channel: +0 Non-supported +1 Supported + + V.76 window size for this channel (1..127) + + V.76 error recovery for this channel: +0 None +1 Non-selective reject +2 Selective reject +3 Multiple selective reject + + CRC type used by V.76 multiplex for this channel: +0 8-bit +1 16-bit +2 32-bit + + V.76 N401 value for this channel (1..127) + + V.42 *bis* maximum string length for this V.76 channel + + V.42 *bis* maximum dictionary size for this V.76 channel + +#### Default values + +In Class 17, for data channel 0, the default application shall be user data, and the default protocol shall be Asynchronous ERM (if available), or Asynchronous UNERM. In Class 18, for data channel 0, the default application shall be user data, and the default protocol shall be LAPM (if available), or Buffered V.14. For additional data channels, default values are manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + ++SDC? + +The DCE shall transmit the current local, preconfigured settings for each existing data channel, one channel per line, e.g. in Class 18 operation: + ++SDC: 0, 3, 2 + ++SDC: 1, 6, 2 + +for a DCE with one LAPM data channel connected to the DTE, and a second channel running H.224 for H.281 camera control. + +**Test syntax** + ++SDC=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of capabilities for each possible data channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++SDC: 0,(0-7),(0-4),,(FFFFF),(0-1),(1-127),(0-3),(0-2), +(1-127),(0-64),(0-2048) + +for a DCE capable of implementing one data channel with all the options. + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple data channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +**3.4 Audio transmit configuration, +SAC** +**Parameter** + ++SAC=,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,[,]]]]]]]]]] + +**Description** + +This parameter sets the preferred operating mode for an outgoing audio channel from audio device . If the remote terminal is incapable of operating at the preferred mode, audio channel operation may take place in another mode within the DCE's capability. + +This command serves to configure the DCE transmit capabilities, and may be issued prior to a connection to change the DCE from the default configuration, or during a connection prior to a +STC command. The subsequent +STC may then trigger a capabilities exchange. + +**Defined values** + + This is a supported audio device code as defined in 2.1. + + This selects or describes the audio encoding standard for the outgoing channel: + +- 0 Non-standard encoding +- 1-3 Reserved +- 4 G.723.1 +- 5 G.728 +- 6 G.729 +- 7 Annex A/G.729 +- 8-255 Reserved for future standardization + + This selects different bit rates for the G.723.1 coder. The use of this subparameter with other coders is for further study: + +- 0 Low bit rate +- 1 High bit rate + + This subparameter enables or disables the use of silence suppression with the G.723.1 coder, and in the case of the G.729 and Annex A/G.729 coders, enables or disables the use of Annex B/G.729 silence suppression. The use of this subparameter with other coders is for further study: + +- 0 No silence suppression +- 1 Silence suppression + +**Recommendation V.252 (02/98)** 7 + +| | | +|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | Selects audio blocking factor | +| | Select V.76 suspend/resume operation:
0 Disabled
1 Enabled | +| | Select V.75 audio header:
0 Disabled
1 Enabled | +| | Select V.76 use of address with suspend/resume:
0 Disabled
1 Enabled | +| | CRC type used by V.76 multiplex for this channel:
0 8-bit
1 16-bit
2 32-bit | +| | V.76 N401 value for this channel (1..127) | + +#### Default values + +Default values are manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + ++SAC? + +The DCE shall transmit the current local, preconfigured settings for each existing outgoing audio channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++SAC: L, 4, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 7 + +for a DCE supporting G.723 audio from the local telephone. + +##### Test syntax + ++SAC=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of capabilities for each possible outgoing audio source, one source per line, e.g.: + ++SAC: L, (4), (0-1), (1), (0), (1), (0), (0-1), (1-7) + ++SAC: M0, (8, 11), (0-1), (1), (0), (1), (0), (0-1), (1-7) + +for a DCE capable of implementing G.723 or Annex A/G.729 audio from both the local telephone and the internal microphone. + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +### 3.5 Audio receive mode +SAM + +#### Parameter + ++SAM=, , , , + +#### Description + +This parameter selects the audio mode of operation for an incoming channel. Multiple +SAM commands may be entered to define a list of preferred modes for the same . + +This command serves to configure RequestMode H.245 messages sent to the remote terminal transmitter, and is not relevant to V.70 Class 17 operation. + +#### Defined values + +| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|------------------------|-----|---------------------|---|---------|---|-------|---|-------|---|---------------|-------|-------------------------------------| +| | This is a supported audio device code as defined in 2.1. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| | This indicates an order of preference for the described mode. Multiple +SAM commands may be entered for the same device, in which case the preference parameter selects the order in which the V.75 or H.245 entity in the DCE will select modes of operation. The lower the number, the higher the preference. Range is 1..255. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| |

This selects or describes the audio encoding standard for the outgoing channel:

0Non-standard encoding
1-3Reserved
4G.723.1
5G.728
6G.729
7Annex A/G.729
8-255Reserved for future standardization
| 0 | Non-standard encoding | 1-3 | Reserved | 4 | G.723.1 | 5 | G.728 | 6 | G.729 | 7 | Annex A/G.729 | 8-255 | Reserved for future standardization | +| 0 | Non-standard encoding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1-3 | Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 4 | G.723.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 5 | G.728 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 6 | G.729 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 7 | Annex A/G.729 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 8-255 | Reserved for future standardization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| |

This selects different bit rates for the G.723.1 coder. The use of this subparameter with other coders is for further study:

0Low bit rate
1High bit rate
| 0 | Low bit rate | 1 | High bit rate | | | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | Low bit rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1 | High bit rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| |

This subparameter enables or disables the use of silence suppression with the G.723.1 coder, and in the case of the G.729 and Annex A/G.729 coders, enables or disables the use of Annex B/G.729 silence suppression. The use of this subparameter with other coders is for further study:

0No silence suppression
1Silence suppression
| 0 | No silence suppression | 1 | Silence suppression | | | | | | | | | | | +| 0 | No silence suppression | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +| 1 | Silence suppression | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + +#### Default values + +Default values are manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + +`+SAM?` + +This returns a list of all +SAM commands in effect in the DCE, one per line, with strings of the form: + +`+SAM: ,,,,` + +e.g., for a DCE that prefers G.723.1 on the local telephone but Annex A/G.729 on the external speaker: + +`+SAM: L,1,4` + +`+SAM: L,2,7` + +`+SAM: S0,1,7` + +`+SAM: S0,2,4` + +##### Test syntax + +`+SAM=?` + +The DCE shall transmit the range of capabilities for each possible incoming audio sink, one sink per line, e.g.: + + + +| | | +|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | This integer selects the Minimum Picture Interval for QCIF16 encoding, with values in the range 1..32. A value of 0 indicates QCIF16 is not supported. | +| | When set to one, this boolean subparameter enables the Unrestricted Vector coding option in the encoder. When set to zero, this option in the encoder is disabled. | +| | When set to one, this boolean subparameter enables the Arithmetic Coding option in the encoder. When set to zero, this option in the encoder is disabled. | +| | When set to one, this boolean subparameter enables the Advanced Prediction option in the encoder. When set to zero, this option in the encoder is disabled. | +| | When set to one, this boolean enables the PB Frames option in the encoder. When set to zero, this option in the encoder is disabled. | + +#### Default values + +Default values are manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + ++SVC? + +The DCE shall transmit the current local, preconfigured settings for each existing outgoing video channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++SVC: C0,1,2,2,240,1,0 + ++SVC: C1,2,2,30,216,1,1,2,32,32,1,1,1,1 + +##### Test syntax + ++SVC=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of capabilities for each possible outgoing video source, one source per line, e.g.: + ++SVC=C0,(1-2),(1-32),(1-32),(144-312)(0-1),(0),(0),(0),(0-1), +(0-1),(0-1),(0-1) + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +### 3.7 Video receive mode +SVM (Class 18 only) + +#### Parameter + ++SVM=,,,[,,,,] + +#### Description + +This parameter selects the video mode of operation for an incoming channel. Multiple +SVM commands may be entered to define a list of preferred modes for the same . + +This command serves to configure the RequestMode H.245 messages sent to the remote terminal transmitter. + + This is a supported video device code as defined in 2.1. + + This indicates an order of preference for the described mode. Multiple +SVM commands may be entered for the same device, in which case the preference parameter selects the order in which the H.245 entity in the DCE will select modes of operation. The lower the number, the higher the preference. Range is 1..255. + +| | | +|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | This subparameter selects video standard:
0 Cancel previous setting at this level
1 H.261
2 H.263 | +| | This subparameter selects the video frame resolution:
1 SQCIF
2 QCIF
3 CIF
4 CIF4
5 CIF16 | +| | This boolean selects whether the Unrestricted Vector coding option is requested in H.263 Video Mode requests. Default 0. | +| | This boolean selects whether the Arithmetic Coding option is requested in H.263 Video Mode requests. Default 0. | +| | This boolean selects whether the Advanced Prediction option is requested in H.263 Video Mode requests. Default 0. | +| | This boolean selects whether the PB Frames option is requested in H.263 Video Mode requests. | + +#### Default values + +Default values are manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + ++SVM? + +This returns a list of all +SVM commands in effect in the DCE, one per line, of the form: + ++SVM: ,,,[,,,,] + +##### Test syntax + ++SVM=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of capabilities for each possible incoming video sink, one sink per line. + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +### 3.8 Data indication reporting, +SDR + +#### Parameter + ++SDR= + +#### Description + +This parameter controls whether or not the +SDI : indications will be generated by the DCE when data channels are established or closed. + +NOTE – In the case of data channel 0, which is assigned to the DTE serial port, generation of +ER and +DR indications, if any, are independently controlled by the +ER and +DR commands in V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +#### Values + +| | | | +|---------|---|--------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | DCE shall not generate +SDI : indications. | +| | 1 | DCE shall generate +SDI : indications. | + +#### Default values + +Recommended default value is zero. + +##### Read syntax + ++SDR? + +This returns the current setting, e.g.: + ++SDR: 0 + +##### Test syntax + ++SDR=? + +The DCE shall return: + ++SDR: (0,1) + +### 3.9 Audio indication reporting, +SARR + +#### Parameter + ++SARR= + +#### Description + +This parameter controls whether or not the +SAR : and +SAT : indications will be generated by the DCE when audio channels are established or closed. + +#### Values + +| | | | +|---------|---|-------------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | DCE shall not generate +SAR : and +SAT : indications. | +| | 1 | DCE shall generate +SAR : and +SAT : indications. | + +#### Default values + +Recommended default value is zero. + +##### Read syntax + ++SARR? + +This returns the current setting, e.g.: + ++SARR: 0 + +##### Test syntax + ++SARR=? + +The DCE shall return: + ++SARR: (0,1) + +### 3.10 Video indication reporting, +SVRR (Class 18 only) + +#### Parameter + ++SVRR= + +#### Description + +This parameter controls whether or not the +SVR: and +SVT: indications will be generated by the DCE when video channels are established or closed. + +#### Values + +| | | | +|---------|---|-----------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | DCE shall not generate +SVR: and +SVT: indications. | +| | 1 | DCE shall generate +SVR: and +SVT: indications. | + +#### Default values + +Recommended default value is zero. + +##### Read syntax + ++SVRR? + +This returns the current setting, e.g.: + ++SVRR: 0 + +##### Test syntax + ++SVRR=? + +The DCE shall return: + ++SVRR: (0, 1) + +### 3.11 Capabilities indication reporting, +SCRR + +#### Parameter + ++SCRR= + +#### Description + +This parameter controls whether or not the +SRCV:, +SRCA, +SRCD and +SRSC: indications will be generated by the DCE when capabilities are received from the remote terminal. + +#### Values + +| | | | +|---------|---|-------------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | DCE shall not generate +SCRn: and +SRSC: indications. | +| | 1 | DCE shall generate +SCRn: and +SRSC: indications. | + +#### Default values + +Recommended default value is zero. + +##### Read syntax + ++SCRR? + +This returns the current setting, e.g.: + ++SCRR: 0 + +## 4 Additional commands + +### 4.1 Set audio code, +VAC + +#### Parameter + ++VAC= + +#### Description + +This parameter sets the audio device that is affected by subsequent +Vxxx commands in this clause (i.e., +VRL, +VSP, +VTA, +VTH, +VDX, +VHC). These commands will be directed to the specified audio device until modified by a subsequent +VAC command. + +#### Values + + This is a supported audio device code as defined in 2.1. + +#### Default value + +The default value is manufacturer-specific. + +##### Read syntax + ++VAC? + +This returns the current setting, e.g.: + ++VAC: S0 + +### 4.2 Receive gain selection, +VGR + +#### Parameter + ++VGR= + +#### Subparameter description + +This command causes the DCE to set the gain for a receive audio channel. + +The receive gain is an unsigned octet where values larger than 128 indicate a larger gain than nominal, and values smaller than 128 indicate a gain smaller than nominal. The nominal value is 128. The largest range of numbers is 0 to 255. The DCE may limit the receive gain to a more narrow range, such as 120 to 136 or 120 to 128. The value of zero is reserved for DCE Automatic Gain Control (AGC). + +This command may be issued prior to the opening of a receive audio channel and its assignment to an audio output device. In this case, the gain setting for the device is stored, and becomes effective when the channel is opened. + +#### Defined values + + This sets the receive channel gain as described above. + +#### Default values + +Default value for shall be either 0 or 128. + +##### Read syntax + ++VGR? + +The DCE shall transmit the current setting for each existing incoming audio channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++VGR: S0,128 + +for an audio channel delivered to a speaker at the nominal gain. + +##### Test syntax + ++VGR=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of receive gain for each possible incoming audio channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++VGR: S0, (1-255) + ++VGR: L, (128) + +for a DCE capable of implementing a full range a gain adjustment on speaker S0, but not AGC, and capable of delivering audio to the local telephone port at only the nominal level. + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +### 4.3 Transmit gain selection, +VGT + +#### Parameter + ++VGT= + +#### Subparameter description + +This command causes the DCE to set the gain for a transmit audio channel. + +The transmit gain is an unsigned octet where values larger than 128 indicate a larger gain than nominal, and values smaller than 128 indicate a gain smaller than nominal. The nominal value is 128. The largest range of numbers is 0 to 255. The DCE may limit the gain to a more narrow range, such as 120 to 136 or 120 to 128. The value of zero is reserved for DCE Automatic Gain Control (AGC). + +This command may be issued prior to the opening of a transmit audio channel and its assignment to an audio input device. In this case, the gain setting for the device is stored, and becomes effective when the channel is opened. + +#### Defined values + +                This sets the transmit channel gain as described above. + +#### Default values + +Default value for shall be either 0 or 128. + +#### Read syntax + ++VGT? + +The DCE shall transmit the current setting for each existing outgoing audio channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++VGT: M0, 128 + +for an audio channel accepted from a microphone at the nominal gain. + +#### Test syntax + ++VGT=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of transmit gain for each possible outgoing audio channel, one channel per line, e.g.: + ++VGT: M0, (1-255) + ++VGT: L, (128) + +for a DCE capable of implementing a full range a gain adjustment on microphone M0, but not AGC, and capable of accepting audio from the local telephone port at only the nominal level. + +NOTE – A DCE response enumerating multiple channels does not imply that these capabilities are available simultaneously. + +### **4.4 Beep tone duration timer, +VTD** + +#### **Parameter** + ++VTD= + +#### **Parameter description** + +This command sets the default DTMF/tone generation duration used by the DCE in conjunction with the +VTS command. + +This command does not affect the settings for the ATD command. + +#### **Defined values** + +| | | | +|-------|--------|-------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | Specifies a manufacturer-specific duration. | +| | 1..255 | Specifies the duration in units of 0.01 second. | + +#### **Default values** + +Default value for shall be 0. + +#### **Read syntax** + ++VTD? + +The DCE shall transmit the current setting, e.g.: + ++VTD: 10 + +#### **Test syntax** + ++VTD=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of values available in the DCE, e.g.: + ++VTD: (1-255) + +### **4.5 DTMF and tone generation, +VTS** + +#### **Parameter** + ++VTS= + +#### **Parameter description** + +This command causes the DCE to produce DTMF tones, single frequency tones, and optionally, double frequency tones. This command allows the DTE to generate a dialtone, busy, etc. for those DCEs capable of generating two arbitrary tones. + +The DCE support for the second tone generation is optional. + +The DCE shall stop the tone generation at the point in the string where the DCE detects a parsing error, encounters an invalid frequency range, encounters a , or encounters a semi-colon. + +If the target audio device is an audio output device, the tones are delivered to the device. + +If this is an input device, and the device is associated with a transmit audio channel, the tones are delivered to the remote device. This accomplished by instructing the remote DCE to generate the tones via a DCE-DCE message, if enabled. If such DCE-DCE messaging is not available, the tones are generated by the local DCE, input to the audio coder, and transported as coded audio over the transmit audio channel. If the input audio device is not associated with a transmit audio channel, an ERROR result code is returned. + +#### Defined values + + The tone generation string shall consist of elements: in a list with where each element is separated by commas. Each element can be: + +- 1) a single ASCII character in the set, 0-9, #, \*, !, and A-D; +- 2) a string drawn from the set but not including ! enclosed in square brackets, "[ ]"; +or +- 3) a string enclosed in curly braces "{ }". + +The DCE shall interpret item 1), a single ASCII character, as a DTMF digit except for ! as a hookflash with a duration given by the +VTD command. The DCE shall interpret item 2), quantity in the square brackets, as a general dual tone and duration selection. The DCE shall interpret item 3), quantity in the curly braces, as a DTMF tone or hookflash with a different duration than that given by the +VTD command. + +The quantity in the square brackets consists of a three-element list. The first element is the first frequency, the second element is the second frequency, and the third element is the duration in 0.01-second intervals. A list may contain null elements. For example, [3000] means that the DCE generates a single tone at 3000 Hz for the default duration; [3000,3300] means that the DCE generates a dual tone at 3000 and 3300 Hz for the default duration; and [,3300] means that the DCE generates a single tone at 3300 Hz for the default duration. + +The quantity in the curly braces consists of a two-element list. The first element is the DTMF tone or hookflash (!) character, and the second element is the duration in 0.01 second. The characters are of the same set given above. A list may contain null elements. For example, {2} means DTMF tone "2" for the default duration, and {} means silence for the default duration. + +#### Default values + +Missing subparameters assume the default value. Unspecified values always default to zero for frequencies, DTMF \* for DTMF tones, and +VTD for duration. The omission of commas (and associated subparameters) are valid. + +#### Test syntax + ++VTS=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of values available in the DCE, e.g.: + +,, + +where the , , and the subparameters comprise a compound range of values. + +Zeros are implied in the response for the frequencies, even if the DCE does report the zeros. The DCE must support a non-zero parameter. + +: First frequency range. + +: Second frequency range. + +: Duration range for the square brackets and curly braces constructs. The units are in 0.01 second. The range of the permitted values for the +VTD command shall be inclusive within the range of the subparameter. + +### 4.6 Ring local phone, +VRL + +#### Parameter + ++VRL=[,[,]...] + +#### Parameter description + +This command causes the DCE to produce ringing voltage to the specified local phone. The command returns the OK result code immediately if all subparameters are found to be properly formatted; the actual production of ringing occurs "asynchronously". No separate indication is given to the DTE when the specified ring pattern has been completed. If the local phone is off-hook, then the ringing is not performed (although an OK result code is still produced); if the local phone goes off-hook during the ringing, then ring voltage is terminated and the remainder of the ringing is not performed. + +#### Defined values + +, The +VRL command can accept a variable number of subparameters. All subparameters are decimal values in the range 0 to 255, each in increments of 100 milliseconds. The first such subparameter indicates the duration of the first ringing segment of the ring pattern; the second subparameter, if present, indicates the duration of the silent period before the next segment of the ring pattern; the third subparameter indicates the duration of the second ringing segment; and so forth, alternatively specifying the duration of the ring and silence segment. Note that it is not necessary to indicate the amount of silence that follows the pattern separating it from the next pattern; it is the responsibility of the DTE to repeat the command (at, typically, 6-second intervals) if additional ring patterns are desired. + +#### Default values + +The DCE shall support subparameter strings specifying a minimum of three subparameters; more may be supported. + +#### Test syntax + ++VRL=? + +(),(), + +where indicates the supported values for the subparameters, indicates the supported values for the subparameters, and indicates the number of subparameters that can appear in a single +VRL command (the subparameters are presumed to be separated by subparameters). + +If the DCE does not support generation of ringing on the local phone, the information text returned is: + +(0) , (0) , 0 + +The information text response: + +(0-255) , (0-255) , 3 + +indicates that the DCE supports the full range of values for both and subparameters, and the minimum three subparameters per string. + +### 4.7 Speakerphone ON/OFF, +VSP + +#### Parameter + ++VSP= + +#### Subparameter description + +This command enables and disables speakerphone operation in the DCE. + +This command may be issued prior to the opening of audio channels and their assignment to audio devices. In this case, the setting is stored, and becomes effective when a microphone (i.e., *Mn*) and speaker (i.e., *Sn*) audio channel are open. + +If more than one microphone or speaker channel are open, speakerphone operation will not be active, regardless of the setting of . + +#### Defined values + +| | | | +|----------|---|--------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | Disable speakerphone operation in the DCE. | +| | 1 | Enable speakerphone operation in the DCE. | + +#### Default values + +Default value for shall be 0. + +##### Read syntax + ++VSP? + +The DCE shall transmit the current setting, e.g.: + ++VSP: 0 + +#### Test syntax + ++VSP=? + +The DCE shall transmit ERROR if speakerphone operation is not available in the DCE, or: + ++VSP: (0, 1) + +If it is available. + +### 4.8 Train acoustic echo-canceller, +VTA + +#### Syntax + ++VTA + +#### Description + +This action command trains the speakerphone function's acoustic echo-canceller. It is optionally used in duplex speakerphone mode. + +The DCE shall return an OK result code at completion of training. + +#### **Abortability** + +This command is not abortable. + +#### **Test syntax** + ++VTA=? + +The DCE shall return OK if the command is implemented, or ERROR if it is not. + +#### **Implementation** + +Implementation of this command is optional. + +### **4.9 Train hybrid echo-canceller, +VTH** + +#### **Syntax** + ++VTH + +#### **Description** + +This action command trains the echo-canceller on the hybrid in the local DCE associated with the connection to local telephone port . It is optionally with such local telephone devices when the connection is a 2-wire interface. + +#### **Abortability** + +This command is not abortable. + +#### **Test syntax** + ++VTH=? + +The DCE shall return OK if the command is implemented, or ERROR if it is not. + +#### **Implementation** + +Implementation of this command is optional. + +### **4.10 Speakerphone configuration, +VDX** + +#### **Parameter** + ++VDX= + +#### **Parameter description** + +This command configures the speakerphone function's mode of operation to half-duplex or duplex. + +This command may be issued prior to the opening of audio channels and their assignment to audio devices. In this case, the setting is stored, and becomes effective when a microphone (i.e., *Mn*) and speaker (i.e., *Sn*) audio channel are open. + +NOTE – Duplex speakerphone operation may be available in some DCE channel configurations and not in others. If the DCE configuration is changed during duplex speakerphone operation, the +VDX parameter setting may be modified, and speakerphone operation may revert to the half-duplex configuration. The DTE may determine the current configuration with the +VDX? read syntax. + +#### **Defined values** + +| | | | +|------------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | Configure speakerphone in the DCE for half-duplex operation. | +| | 1 | Configure speakerphone in the DCE for duplex operation. | + +#### Default values + +Default value for shall be manufacturer defined. + +##### Read syntax + ++VDX? + +The DCE shall transmit the current setting, e.g.: + ++VDX: 0 + +#### Test syntax + ++VDX=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of values available in the DCE, e.g.: + ++VDX: (0, 1) + +### 4.11 Phone hookswitch status, +VPH + +#### Parameter description + +This is a read-only parameter, that reports the on-hook/off-hook status of local phone devices connected to the DCE (i.e., it reports whether the devices are drawing loop current from the DCE). + +#### Read syntax + ++VPH? + +The DCE shall transmit the current status for each local phone, e.g.: + ++VPH: L0, 1 + ++VPH: L1, 0 + +Reports that the phone on L0 is drawing loop current, while the phone at L1 is not. + +#### Test syntax + ++VPH=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of reportable values for each telephone port on the DCE configured for central office simulation, e.g.: + ++VPH: L0, (0, 1) + ++VPH: L1, (0, 1) + +### 4.12 Telephony port hook control, +VHC + +#### Parameter + ++VHC= + +#### Subparameter description + +This command place on- and off-hook those telephone ports on the DCE that are configured for single-line telephone simulation. + +#### Defined values + +| | | | +|------------|---|--------------------------------| +| | 0 | Place telephony port on hook. | +| | 1 | Place telephony port off hook. | + +#### Default values + +Default value for shall be 0 for all applicable 's. + +##### Read syntax + ++VHC? + +The DCE shall transmit the hook status for each local phone port configured for single-line telephone simulation, e.g.: + ++VHC: L0, 1 + ++VHC: L1, 0 + +reports that port L0 is off hook, while the port L1 is on hook. + +##### Test syntax + ++VHC=? + +The DCE shall transmit the range of allowable values for each telephone port on the DCE configured for single-line telephone simulation, e.g.: + ++VHC: L0, (0, 1) + ++VHC: L1, (0, 1) + +## 5 Indications + +If so configured by the DTE, the DCE may generate information text indications that inform the DTE when channels are established or closed; for example, at the commencement of V.70 or H.324 operation. + +These indications will typically be generated at the initiation of V.70/H.324 operation, after the +MR modulation reports, but before the CONNECT result code, which indicates that the data channel to the DTE is ready for operation, or before the OK final result code, which is used in the case of initial H.324 operation that does not include a data channel. Since a capabilities exchange takes place at the beginning of every H.324 session, a +SRC indication is always generated at this time. + +NOTE – In the case of data channel 0, which is assigned to the DTE serial port, +ER and/or +DR indications may also be generated. These are independently controlled by the +ER and +DR commands in V.250 (ex-V.25ter). These indications may also be generated during a communication session as channels are established or closed, either directly to the DTE while in on-line command state, or in-band while in data state; see 7.1. + +### 5.1 Remote terminal capabilities indications + +These indications report the capabilities of the remote terminal, as reported by the terminal using H.245 procedures. The remote terminal reports at least its receive capabilities at least once during a communications session. The terminal may also report its transmit capability. The +SRCA, +SRCV, and +SRCD indications are used to report the remote terminal's capability table entry definitions. The +SRSC indications are used to report each of the remote terminal's simultaneous capability sets and reference the capability table entry definitions previously reported by the +SRCA, +SRCV, and +SRCD indications. The collection of +SRSC indications report the capability set of the remote terminal. + + + +#### Description + +This indication reports the establishment or closing of a data channel with data channel identifier , on port number . Values are as defined in the +SDC command. An indication which just supplies the value indicated that the corresponding data channel has been closed. + +NOTE – In the case of data channel 0, which is assigned to the DTE serial port, +ER and/or +DR indications may also be generated. These are independently controlled by the +ER and +DR commands in V.25ter. + +### 5.3 Audio receive channel indication, +SAR + +#### Format + ++SAR: ,,,,,[,,,,,] + +#### Description + +This indication reports the establishment or closing of an incoming audio channel to audio device , with port number . Values are as defined in the +SAM command. An indication which just supplies the value indicated that the corresponding audio channel has been closed. + +### 5.4 Audio transmit channel indication, +SAT + +#### Format + ++SAT: ,,,,,[,,,,,] + +#### Description + +This indication reports the establishment or closing of an outgoing audio channel from audio device , with port number . Values are as defined in the +SAC command. An indication which just supplies the value indicated that the corresponding audio channel has been closed. + +### 5.5 Video receive channel indication, +SVR (Class 18 only) + +#### Format + ++SVR: ,,,[,,,,] + +#### Description + +This indication reports the establishment or closing of an incoming video channel to video device , with port number . Values are as defined in the +SVM command. An indication which just supplies the value indicated that the corresponding video channel has been closed. + +### 5.6 Video transmit channel indication, +SVT (Class 18 only) + +#### Format + ++SVT: ,,,,,,[,,,,,,,] + +#### **Description** + +This indication reports the establishment or closing of an outgoing video channel from video device , with port number . Values are as defined in the +SVC command. An indication which just supplies the value indicated that the corresponding video channel has been closed. + +## **6 Additional indications** + +### **6.1 Audio code report, +VACR** + +#### **Format** + ++VACR: + +#### **Description** + +This indication proceeds the +VCIDR, +VDIDR, and +VTER indications defined in this clause. It indicates to which audio devices these subsequent indications apply. If consecutive indications in this clause are output by the DCE, the DCE may omit the intervening +VACR report. + +### **6.2 Caller ID report, +VCIDR** + +#### **Format** + ++VCIDR: + +#### **Description** + +Caller ID sequence detected at telephone port , which is configured for single-line telephone simulation. The subparameter contains the entire received Caller ID information found in the single data message format, contained in the Single Data Message (SDM) and in the Multiple Data Message (MDM) packets, excluding the leading U's (line seizure information). The checksum shall be included. The shall contain the entire Caller ID packet in hex as printable numbers. The characters in the hex message shall be in the bit order received by the DCE. The DCE shall include all message type octet(s), message length octet(s), data octet(s), and checksum octet(s). + +### **6.3 DID report, +VDIDR** + +#### **Format** + ++VDIDR: + +#### **Description** + +Direct Inward Dialing (DID) detected at telephone port , which is configured for telephone simulation. The content of shall be a string of digits representing the DID information detected. + +### **6.4 Simple telephony event report, +VTER** + +#### **Format** + ++VTER: + +#### Description + +Reports that event was detected at the telephony device *Ln* indicated by . Defined values of are: + +| Code | Description | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0-9 | DTMF 0-9 | +| A-D | DTMF A-D | +| E | DTMF * | +| F | DTMF # | +| h | Line current break (local phone goes on hook). (Note 1) | +| H | Line current detected (local phone goes off hook). (Note 1) | +| ! | Hook-Flash (Line current interruption). (Note 1) | +| L | Loop current polarity reversal. This may indicate a hang-up or a receive depending on the implementation of the central office. (Note 2) | +| r | Ringback (cadence). (Note 2) | +| b | BUSY (cadence). If the DCE continues to detect BUSY, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 4.0 seconds. The detection criterion is implementation specific. (Note 2) | +| d | DIALTONE. If the DCE continues to detect DIALTONE, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 3.0 seconds. The detection criterion is implementation specific. (Note 2) | +| K | Reorder/fast busy (cadence). (Note 2) | +| p | Line voltage increase (extension phone goes on hook). (Note 2) | +| P | Line voltage decrease (extension phone goes off hook). (Note 2) | +| R (n) | Ringing detected. The value of (n), if included, specifies distinctive ringing cadence detected. If n is omitted, standard ringing cadence (1) shall be assumed. Valid values for (n) are 1-4. (Note 2) | +| i | Stuttered dialtone. (Note 2) | +| NOTE 1 – Applicable when port is configured for central office simulation. | | +| NOTE 2 – Applicable when port is configured for single-line telephone simulation. | | + +## 7 In-band indications and commands + +### 7.1 In-band indications + +If so configured by the DTE, the DCE shall generate in-band indications reporting channel establishment, closing, etc., using the in-band procedures defined in clause 7/V.80, using the STATUS Extended in-band command. If this mode of operation is desired by the DTE and is available in the DCE, it shall be enabled with the +IBC command. + +### 7.2 In-band commands + +If so configured by the DTE, the DCE shall accept in-band commands for channel establishment, closing, reconfiguration, etc., using the in-band procedures defined in clause 7/V.80, using the CONTROL Extended-0 in-band command. If this mode of operation is desired by the DTE and is available in the DCE, it shall be enabled with the +IBC command. The DTE may use in-band +STC + +commands to establish new channels or close existing ones. The DTE may use in-band +SDC, +SAC, +SAM, +SVC (Class 18 only), and +SVM (Class 18 only) commands to change the configuration of an existing channel. The DTE may use in-band +V commands defined in clause 4 to control audio and telephony operation. + +### **7.3 Remote DCE in-band commands and indications** + +The telephony control commands (+VRL, +VSP, +VTA, +VTH, +VDX, +VPH, +VHC) and the telephony indications (+VCIDR, +VDIDR, +VTER) may be exchanged between the local DTE and the remote DCE. These messages use the same syntax as the CONTROL and STATUS extended in-band commands for the local DCE, but the Extended-0 command code 45h is used for remote DCE commands, rather than 42h as is used for the local DCE, and 65h is used for remote DCE status reports, rather than 62h as is used for reports from the local DCE. + +# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES + +| | | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T | +| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification | +| Series C | General telecommunication statistics | +| Series D | General tariff principles | +| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors | +| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services | +| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks | +| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems | +| Series I | Integrated services digital network | +| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals | +| Series K | Protection against interference | +| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant | +| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits | +| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits | +| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment | +| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks | +| Series Q | Switching and signalling | +| Series R | Telegraph transmission | +| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment | +| Series T | Terminals for telematic services | +| Series U | Telegraph switching | +| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network | +| Series X | Data networks and open system communications | +| Series Y | Global information infrastructure | +| Series Z | Programming languages | \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marked/V/T-REC-V.253-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/V/T-REC-V.253-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e87056ba55b3f0d914f61238c0b3f449f126b38 --- /dev/null +++ b/marked/V/T-REC-V.253-199802-I_PDF-E/raw.md @@ -0,0 +1,3266 @@ + + +![ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt symbol below it.](2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg) + +ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt symbol below it. + +INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION + +# ITU-T + +TELECOMMUNICATION +STANDARDIZATION SECTOR +OF ITU + +# V.253 + +(02/98) + +SERIES V: DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE +TELEPHONE NETWORK + +Control procedures + +--- + +**Control of voice-related functions in a DCE by +an asynchronous DTE** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.253 + +(Previously CCITT Recommendation) + +--- + +# ITU-T V-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **DATA COMMUNICATION OVER THE TELEPHONE NETWORK** + +| | | +|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------| +| General | V.1–V.9 | +| Interfaces and voiceband modems | V.10–V.34 | +| Wideband modems | V.35–V.39 | +| Error control | V.40–V.49 | +| Transmission quality and maintenance | V.50–V.59 | +| Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals | V.60–V.99 | +| Interworking with other networks | V.100–V.199 | +| Interface layer specifications for data communication | V.200–V.249 | +| Control procedures | V.250–V.299 | + +*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.* + +# **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION V.253** + +# **CONTROL OF VOICE-RELATED FUNCTIONS IN A DCE BY AN ASYNCHRONOUS DTE** + +## **Summary** + +This Recommendation builds upon and extends the Asynchronous DCE "AT" command set defined in Recommendation V.250. It describes a DCE command and response syntax for voice playback and record, for generation and detection of DTMF and other tones, as well as a syntax for switching between data mode, facsimile mode, and other future modes of operation. The additional mechanisms defined in this Recommendation allow a DTE in combination with a V.253-equipped DCE to implement Telephone Answering Device functions, optional speakerphone functions, and to switch to appropriate data, facsimile, or other modes of operation depending on the type of the incoming call. + +## **Source** + +ITU-T Recommendation V.253 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 16 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 6th of February 1998. + +## FOREWORD + +ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. + +The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. + +The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1. + +In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. + +## NOTE + +In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. + +## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS + +The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. + +As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database. + +© ITU 1998 + +All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. + +## CONTENTS + +| | | Page | +|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 | +| 2 | References ..... | 1 | +| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 | +| 4 | Voice states and operation of a voice-capable DCE ..... | 4 | +| 4.1 | Non-speakerphone section of a voice DCE..... | 4 | +| | 4.1.1 Voice states ..... | 5 | +| | 4.2.1 Voice states ..... | 6 | +| 5 | Voice and network signalling support..... | 7 | +| 5.1 | Events (reports sent to the DTE) ..... | 7 | +| 5.2 | Actions (commands sent to the DCE) ..... | 8 | +| 5.3 | Call discrimination ..... | 10 | +| | 5.3.1 Description and definitions ..... | 10 | +| | 5.3.2 Hook control under voice..... | 10 | +| 5.4 | Timing marks in the voice data stream ..... | 12 | +| 5.5 | Compression method and availability of event detection..... | 12 | +| 6 | Operation..... | 12 | +| 6.1 | Numeric radix..... | 12 | +| 6.2 | Format conventions ..... | 13 | +| | 6.2.1 Numbering conventions ..... | 13 | +| | 6.2.2 Order of bit transmission..... | 13 | +| | 6.2.3 Code word mapping conventions..... | 13 | +| 6.3 | Command structure ..... | 13 | +| | 6.3.1 AT commands ..... | 13 | +| | 6.3.2 Basic command syntax..... | 14 | +| | 6.3.3 Extended command syntax ..... | 14 | +| | 6.3.4 Issuing commands..... | 17 | +| | 6.3.5 Command execution ..... | 17 | +| | 6.3.6 DCE responses from AT commands..... | 18 | +| | 6.3.7 Data stream transparent commands ( Shielded)..... | 18 | +| 6.4 | Session management ..... | 20 | +| | 6.4.1 Scope..... | 20 | +| | 6.4.2 Flow control ..... | 22 | +| | 6.4.3 Serial data interchange circuits ..... | 23 | +| | 6.4.4 DTE/DCE interface rate changes ..... | 24 | + +| | Page | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 6.4.5 DTE/DCE inactivity timer ..... | 25 | +| 6.4.6 DCE implementations without data modes..... | 25 | +| 7 Events (unsolicited result codes)..... | 26 | +| 7.1 Forms of the event detection report..... | 26 | +| 7.1.1 Simple event detection report..... | 26 | +| 7.1.2 Complex event detection report ..... | 26 | +| 7.2 Event reports restrictions..... | 28 | +| 7.3 shielded event codes sent to the DTE..... | 28 | +| 7.4 Minimum event reporting requirements..... | 32 | +| 7.5 DTMF event report sequence ..... | 33 | +| 7.6 Recorded DTMF tone on playback ..... | 33 | +| 7.7 Silence detection during voice receives ..... | 34 | +| 8 Actions ..... | 35 | +| 8.1 Simple action commands ..... | 35 | +| 8.2 Configuration setting and initiating action commands..... | 35 | +| 8.3 codes sent to the DCE ..... | 35 | +| 8.3.1 Adjusting the volume and gain levels by codes..... | 39 | +| 8.3.2 Pause and resume commands during voice states with DTE to DCE data
transfers ..... | 39 | +| 9 Support commands ..... | 40 | +| 9.1 Action commands..... | 40 | +| 9.1.1 Dial command in voice (with +FCLASS=8.0) ..... | 40 | +| 9.1.2 Hangup command in voice (with +FCLASS=8)..... | 41 | +| 9.1.3 Repeat Caller ID (+VRID)..... | 41 | +| 9.2 Configuration commands ..... | 42 | +| 9.2.1 Mode selection ..... | 42 | +| 9.2.2 +FCLASS=?..... | 43 | +| 9.2.3 Caller Id service ..... | 43 | +| 9.2.4 DID service ..... | 46 | +| 9.2.5 Automatic hangup control..... | 47 | +| 9.3 Miscellaneous AT commands ..... | 48 | +| 9.3.1 S-parameters..... | 48 | +| 9.3.2 ATZ..... | 48 | +| 10 Voice commands ..... | 48 | +| 10.1 Action commands..... | 48 | + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| 10.1.1 Initialize voice parameters ..... | 48 | +| 10.1.2 Ring local phone ..... | 48 | +| 10.1.3 Voice receive state ..... | 50 | +| 10.1.4 Voice duplex state ..... | 51 | +| 10.1.5 DTMF and tone generation in voice ..... | 53 | +| 10.1.6 Transmit data state ..... | 56 | +| 10.2 Action controls (configuration command) ..... | 57 | +| 10.2.1 Receive gain selection..... | 57 | +| 10.2.2 Volume selection..... | 57 | +| 10.2.3 DTE/DCE inactivity timer ..... | 58 | +| 10.2.4 Analogue source/destination selection..... | 58 | +| 10.2.5 Ringing tone goes away timer..... | 61 | +| 10.2.6 Ringing tone never appeared timer ..... | 61 | +| 10.2.7 Silence detection (QUIET and SILENCE)..... | 62 | +| 10.2.8 Compression method selection ..... | 63 | +| 10.2.9 Beep tone duration timer..... | 66 | +| 10.3 Response controls (configuration commands) ..... | 67 | +| 10.3.1 Distinctive ring (ring cadence reporting)..... | 67 | +| 10.3.2 Control tone cadence reporting ..... | 70 | +| 10.4 DTE/DCE interface (configuration commands)..... | 71 | +| 10.4.1 Buffer threshold setting..... | 71 | +| 10.4.2 Voice packet protocol ..... | 71 | +| 10.4.3 Select DTE/DCE interface rate (turn off automatic rate detection)..... | 72 | +| 10.5 Speakerphone commands..... | 73 | +| 10.5.1 Voice speakerphone state..... | 73 | +| 10.5.2 Microphone gain ..... | 76 | +| 10.5.3 Speaker gain..... | 77 | +| 10.5.4 Train acoustic echo-canceller..... | 77 | +| 10.5.5 Train line echo-canceller..... | 77 | +| 10.5.6 Speakerphone duplex mode ..... | 77 | +| 10.5.7 +VEM=..... | 78 | +| Annex A – Interworking with existing voice DTE..... | 78 | +| Appendix I ..... | 80 | +| I.1 Suggested compression method and sample rate selection..... | 80 | +| I.2 Recording a welcome message..... | 81 | +| I.3 Play back the welcome message..... | 82 | +| I.4 Answer the phone, play the greeting message and record a message..... | 82 | + +| | Page | +|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------| +| I.5 Answer the phone, record a message and receive a facsimile..... | 84 | +| I.6 Answer the phone and determine it is a facsimile..... | 85 | +| I.7 Answer the phone and execute a facsimile protocol ..... | 86 | +| I.8 Answer the phone and execute a data handshake..... | 88 | +| Appendix II..... | 89 | +| II.1 Projected DTE/DCE interface rates at different sampling rates..... | 89 | +| II.2 Common analog source/destination hardware configurations ..... | 90 | +| Appendix III – North American network documents..... | 91 | + +# **Recommendation V.253** + +# **CONTROL OF VOICE-RELATED FUNCTIONS IN A DCE BY AN ASYNCHRONOUS DTE** + +*(Geneva, 1998)* + +# **1 Scope** + +This Recommendation builds upon and extends the current Asynchronous DCE control Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*), to include a voice control and response interface definition, a collection of basic primitive functions that allows the DTE to implement a call discrimination algorithm, and a simplified general control structure, which would include data, facsimile, voice, and other future modes as personalities. + +In particular, this Recommendation: + +- describes a DCE command and response syntax for voice playback and record, generation and detection of DTMF and other tones, and a syntax to switch to facsimile, data modes, and other future modes. Optional Speakerphone operations are also included; +- addresses the playing and recording of voice data; +- describes compression method identifications; +- does not describe the call discrimination algorithm; +- mandates that at least one of the voice compression algorithms listed in Table 17 be supported. + +NOTE – The transmission of duplex voice on the DTE interface is for further study. + +At the time of the adoption of this Recommendation, no agreement exists regarding the optimal call discrimination algorithm, or even whether a single algorithm is possible. In particular, there is question of the proper processing load distribution of the call discrimination operation – whether the DCE should contain the entire algorithm, or whether the DTE and DCE must share the effort. This Recommendation requires the DTE and DCE to share the call discrimination effort, since the actual algorithm is unknown and a DCE only solution may entail unacceptable DCE storage requirements. + +This Recommendation assumes that the DTE and DCE are connected via a serial asynchronous connection using V.24 circuits, and facilitates the use of serial ports by including and extending the T.32 Packet Protocol as an optional enhancement. The actual DTE/DCE command and data interchange may be implemented in any environment that provides a octet serial bi-directional data stream, including, but not limited to – processor bus attached "Fax Boards", local area networks, etc. The adaptation of the DTE/DCE command and data interchange contained in this Recommendation to these alternative communication schemes is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. + +# **2 References** + +The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. + +- CCITT Recommendation G.711 (1988), *Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies.* +- ITU-T Recommendation G.723.1 (1996), *Speech coders: Dual rate speech coder for multimedia communications transmitting at 5.3 and 6.3 kbit/s.* +- CCITT Recommendation G.726 (1990), *40, 32, 24, 16 kbit/s Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (ADPCM).* +- CCITT Recommendation G.728 (1992), *Coding of speech at 16 kbit/s using low-delay code excited linear prediction.* +- ITU-T Recommendation G.729 Annex A (1996), *Reduced complexity 8 kbit/s CS-ACELP speech codec.* +- ITU-T Recommendation T.31 (1995), *Asynchronous facsimile DCE control – Service Class 1.* +- ITU-T Recommendation T.32 (1995), *Asynchronous facsimile DCE control – Service Class 2.* +- CCITT Recommendation T.50 (1992), *International Reference Alphabet (IRA) (formerly International Alphabet No. 5 or IA5), Information technology – 7-bit coded character set for information interchange.* +- CCITT Recommendation V.4 (1988), *General structure of signals of International Alphabet No 5 code for character oriented data transmission over public telephone networks.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.8 bis (1996), *Procedures for identification and selection of common modes of operation between Data Circuit-terminating Equipments (DCEs) and between Data Terminal Equipments (DTEs) over the general switched telephone network and on leased point-to-point telephone-type circuits.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.18 (1996), *Operational and interworking requirements for DCEs operating in the text telephone mode.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.24 (1996), *List of definitions for interchange circuits between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE).* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.25 bis (1996), *Synchronous and asynchronous automatic dialling procedures on switched networks.* +- ITU-T Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 ter) (1997), *Serial asynchronous automatic dialling and control.* +- ISO 2111, *Data communication – Basic mode control procedures – Code independent information transfer.* +- ISO/IEC 3309:1993, *Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – High-level Data Link Control (HDLC) procedures – Frame structure.* + +# 3 Definitions + +This Recommendation defines the following terms. + +**3.1 Data Terminal Equipment (DTE):** A DTE is any terminal or computer capable of providing commands and data to operate a DCE, facsimile DCE, or a voice DCE. In practice, a DTE is a computer of any size. + +**3.2 Data Circuit-terminating Equipment (DCE):** A DCE is any device that connects a DTE to a communications network. This Recommendation focuses on DCEs that connect to the General Switched Telephone Network (GSTN). This class of DCEs includes DCEs compatible with V-Series modem Recommendations, facsimile DCEs, and voice DCEs. + +**3.3 facsimile DCE:** A facsimile DCE is a device that provides facsimile communication facilities between a DTE and a remote Group 3 facsimile station across the GSTN, using the procedures specified in Recommendation T.31 or T.32. + +**3.4 voice DCE:** A voice DCE is a device that provides voice communication facilities between a DTE and a remote station (source or destination of analog signals) across the GSTN. The DCE may provide services for selecting one or more local devices (to the DCE), in conjunction or in isolation from the GSTN, as the analog signal source/destination. + +**3.5 voice mode (data and facsimile):** The overall DCE mode of operation that performs voice functions by accepting +V prefixed commands (voice commands), and providing voice and call discrimination event reports to the DTE. See 6.4.1.1 for details about the scope and rules of use for the +V prefixed commands. + +**3.6 command state:** The DCE is not operating in the Voice Mode, and is not communicating with a remote station making the DCE ready to accept commands. The DCE considers data transfers from the DTE as command lines, processes these lines, and returns responses back to the DTE after completing the processing of the command lines. See 4.1.1.1 for the definition of the Voice Command State. + +**3.7 data state:** The DCE is not operating in the Voice Mode, and is communicating with a remote station. The DTE transfers data to the DCE for transmission to the remote station, and the DCE transfers data to the DTE after reception from the remote station. The DCE monitors data and the control signals to detect events, which the DCE later reports to the DTE, pertaining to the line connecting the DCE and the remote station, and pertaining to requests from the DTE. See subclause 4.1.1.2 for the definition of Voice Transmit State, subclause 4.1.1.3 for the definition of Voice Receive State, subclause 4.1.1.4 for the definition of the Voice Duplex State, and subclause 4.2.1.2 for the definition of the Voice Speakerphone State. + +**3.8 distinctive ringing:** A service in which the central office or PBX equipment generates different ring patterns to permit the called user or equipment to deduce information about an incoming call before the call is answered. For example, a PBX may generate different ring patterns based on whether the call is from an inside extension or an outside trunk; a central office may generate different patterns to indicate which directory number was dialed, when multiple numbers are assigned to a single line. + +**3.9 ringing tone:** The audible signal generated by the remote central telephone office to indicate that it is generating rings on the called subscriber line. + +**3.10 voice-aware software:** DTE program that is capable of utilizing and being compatible with the Voice Mode; otherwise the program is Voice-unaware Software. + +**3.11 automatic rate detection:** The term automatic rate detection, sometimes referred to as "autobauding", refers to the action of the DCE, while in Command State, of automatically detecting the data rate and parity of the DTE is using for each issued command line. As an example of a possible DCE automatic rate detection algorithm, the DCE measures the duration of the start bit of the "A" or "a" of the AT command line prefix. Once the DCE establishes the data rate and parity, the DCE will use this rate for all subsequent DCE-to-DTE data transmissions, including unsolicited result codes such as RING, until the DTE changes the rate or parity again. + +**3.12 silence compression:** Silence compression is the DCE replacement of a period of sustained inactivity, determination of which is unspecified, by placing a manufacturer specific code word(s) in the place where the DCE removed the silence. Silence compression code words are part of the compression method, and are not separately defined in this Recommendation. + +# 4 Voice states and operation of a voice-capable DCE + +A DCE is put into the Voice Mode by the command **+FCLASS=8.0**. While in the Voice Mode, a DCE is responsive to voice record, playback, and duplex commands, which begin with the prefix **+V**. Some **+V** commands may also be valid in other DCE modes, such as data mode (**+FCLASS=0**). + +At the top level (and for the purposes of this Recommendation), a DCE may comprise a non-speakerphone section and a speakerphone section. Figure 1 – Relationship between Sections and Voice States illustrates the relationship between the sections and the individual Voice States. The definition of Voice States follows in 4.1.1. Note that the Voice Command State is common. + +![Diagram illustrating the relationship between sections and voice states. The Non-speakerphone Voice Section contains Voice Transmit State, Voice Receive State, and Voice Duplex State. The Speakerphone Voice Section contains Voice Speakerphone State. The Voice Command State is common to both sections.](1439cb942d9e363bbb3161b5540dd8c6_img.jpg) + +The diagram shows two overlapping rectangular boxes. The left box is labeled "Non-speakerphone Voice Section" and contains three circles: "Voice Transmit State", "Voice Receive State", and "Voice Duplex State". The right box is labeled "Speakerphone Voice Section" and contains one circle: "Voice Speakerphone State". A fourth circle, "Voice Command State", is located in the intersection of the two boxes. Lines connect "Voice Transmit State", "Voice Receive State", and "Voice Duplex State" to "Voice Command State". A line also connects "Voice Command State" to "Voice Speakerphone State". + +T1605190-98 + +Diagram illustrating the relationship between sections and voice states. The Non-speakerphone Voice Section contains Voice Transmit State, Voice Receive State, and Voice Duplex State. The Speakerphone Voice Section contains Voice Speakerphone State. The Voice Command State is common to both sections. + +**Figure 1/V.253 – Relationship between sections and voice states** + +## 4.1 Non-speakerphone section of a voice DCE + +The DCE has four states – the Voice Command State (no data transfers other than event reports), the Voice Transmit State (digitized voice data transfer from the DTE to the DCE), the Voice Receive State (digitized voice data transfer from the DCE to the DTE), and the Voice Duplex State (digitized voice data transfer to and from the DTE and DCE). Note that the Voice Transmit State and the Voice Receive State are half-duplex (digitized voice data transfer from the DCE-to-DTE or from the DTE to the DCE as separate functions). + +The DCE may issue event detection reports at any time, regardless of the DCE state. These reports may describe tone and cadence, such as calling tone detection, that may be a result of external switching functions or PSTN line activities (Ring), or may be a combination (Caller ID). This Recommendation does not require the DCE to monitor all of the listed events all of the time. + +This Recommendation makes several assumptions, listed below, about the voice data stream. + +- 1) The DTE is not required to interpret the incoming voice data stream, other than for shielded codes. +- 2) As a result of assumption 1, the DTE cannot examine the contents of the data stream to do energy measurements, and other estimations of voice content. +- 3) The DCE supports one PSTN line for voice mode. + +### **4.1.1 Voice states** + +**4.1.1.1 voice command state:** The DCE is in the Voice Command State when the DCE is operating in the Voice Mode, and is not communicating with a remote station nor with any local devices, which are capable of translating analog signals to voice (e.g. speaker) or translating voice to analog signals (e.g. microphone), making the DCE ready to accept commands. The DCE considers data transfers from the DTE as command lines, processes these lines, and returns responses back to the DTE after completing the processing of the command lines. When not processing commands, the DCE monitors the line, which connects the DCE to the remote station or to the local device, to detect events, which the DCE later reports to the DTE, pertaining to signals carried over the line such as tones, and pertaining to GSTN generated control and notification signals such as ringing. + +The Voice Command State permits the DTE several options, such as waiting for an unspecified time after playing a welcome message, or switching to other modes as part of a DTE call discrimination algorithm. + +The DCE will issue the OK result code when the DCE is in the Voice Command State and connects to one or more active analog source(s)/destination(s). Activating the microphone or going off-hook on a Telco connection are examples of activating an analog source and a source/destination, respectively. + +**4.1.1.2 voice transmit state:** The DCE enters the Voice Transmit State upon executing the +VTX command. In this state, the DCE receives the digitized data from the DTE, converts the binary data into an analog signal, and transmits the analog signal to the remote station or to one or more other local device destinations such as a speaker. While transmitting the data: + +- 1) the DCE monitors the line, which connects the DCE to the remote station or to one or more local devices, to detect events, which the DCE reports to the DTE. These events pertain to signals carried over the line such as tones, and to GSTN generated control and notification signals such as ringing; and +- 2) the DCE does not expect to receive, digitize, or process any incoming analog signals for transfer to the DTE. + +This Recommendation provides for two ways to leave the Voice Transmit State: + +- 1) a shielded code; and +- 2) a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out. + +Item 1) is the DTE initiated means of terminating the Voice Transmit State, and item 2) is a DCE-initiated means of terminating the Voice Transmit State. After termination of the Voice Transmit State, the DCE shall enter the Voice Command State. + +**4.1.1.3 voice receive state:** The DCE enters the Voice Receive State upon executing the **+VRX** command. In this state, the DCE digitizes the analog signal from the remote station or from some other local device source such as a microphone, converts the analog signal into binary data, compresses or otherwise processes the data, and transfers the resulting data to the DTE. While receiving the data: + +- 1) the DCE monitors the line, which connects the DCE to the remote station or to one or more local devices, to detect events, which the DCE reports to the DTE. These events pertain to signals carried over the line such as tones, and to GSTN generated control and notification signals such as ringing; and +- 2) the DCE does not expect to receive digitized data from the DTE, perform conversion, and transmit the analog signal to the remote station or to one or more local devices. + +This Recommendation provides for two ways to leave the Voice Receive State: + +- 1) a ****; and +- 2) a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out. + +The DCE shall inform the DTE, via **** codes, about pertinent events during the voice receive, such as "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET) and "Presumed Hangup" (SILENCE) detected, BUSY detected, and DIALTONE detected, so that, at the discretion of the DTE, the DTE may terminate the Voice Receive State. + +**4.1.1.4 voice duplex state:** The DCE enters the Voice Duplex State upon executing the **+VTR** command. This command is a direct combination of the Voice Transmit State (**+VTX** command) and the Voice Receive State (**+VRX** command) with the following exception: + +The DCE shall not leave the Voice Duplex State upon receiving a **** command or a **** command, and shall ignore these commands. The use of these commands to transition to half-duplex states is for further study. The DCE shall leave the Voice Duplex State upon receiving the **<^>** command. + +Note that this mode does not require the DCE to provide any Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) nor any Line Echo Cancellation (LEC). + +**4.2 Speakerphone section of a voice DCE:** The DCE has two states – the Voice Command State (no data transfers other than event reports), and the Voice Speakerphone State (digitized voice data transfer between the DTE and DCE). + +The DCE may issue event detection reports in the Voice Command State as described above (see 4.1). + +The DCE may issue event reports in the Voice Speakerphone mode only if the DCE provides that capability and the DTE enables the DCE to proceed with event reporting in the Voice Speakerphone State (**+VEM** command, see 10.5.7). + +### **4.2.1 Voice states** + +#### **4.2.1.1 Voice Command State** + +The Voice Command State is the same for the Speakerphone section and the Non-speakerphone section (see 4.1.1.1). + +#### **4.2.1.2 Voice Speakerphone State** + +Depending on the **+VSP** command (see 10.5.1) setting, the DCE may transfer analogue or digitized data (as appropriate): + +- between the DCE microphone/speaker and the PSTN line; + +- between the PSTN line and the DTE; +- between the microphone/speaker and the DTE. + +If the DTE and DCE exchange digitized voice data, the Voice Speakerphone Mode follows the Voice Duplex Mode (see 4.1.1.4) operation description. + +If event report are enabled (+**VEM** command, see 10.5.7), the DCE shall perform event reports while in the Voice Speakerphone State (which comprises all non-zero +**VSP** settings). + +# 5 Voice and network signalling support + +## 5.1 Events (reports sent to the DTE) + +The Voice Mode may return many new event detection reports other than the familiar RING result code used in data and facsimile modems. While in the Voice Mode, the DCE can detect DTMF, detect tone and cadence events associated with call progress activities, evaluate voice quality, and monitor Telco related activities. The DCE shall report the event to the DTE at the time of detection. + +Table 1 lists the events without any regard as to whether the DCE reporting of the event is optional or mandatory, and without assigning a DCE reporting mechanism. See 7.4 for information on minimum reporting requirements, and optional and mandatory DCE event reporting. + +The first column of Table 1 lists the event number assignment for each event. The event number also serves another purpose; each number is a bit position in a bit field. Event number 0 is the most significant bit of the left most hex number in a hex representation (this Recommendation defines a total of eight hex digits). The final bit in the bit field occupies the least significant bit position of the right-most hex number. The bit representations of the event numbers are used in the +**VLS**= command. + +The third column of Table 1 lists whether a single character is enough to report the event, or if the DCE must supply a more complicated report. The description Simple indicates a single character response ( shielded), Message indicates a full text message ( packet), and Pattern indicates a repeating Message. + +See Table 10 for a list of the event code assignments (method of reporting). + +**Table 1/V.253 – Events detectable in the voice mode** + +| Event number | Event description | Event reporting | +|--------------|------------------------------------|-----------------| +| 0 | Caller Id Report | Message | +| 1 | DID Report | Message | +| 2 | Distinctive Ringing | Pattern | +| 3 | RING | Simple | +| 4 | DTMF Received | Simple | +| 5 | Receive Buffer Overrun | Simple | +| 6 | Facsimile Calling (e.g. 1100 Hz) | Simple | +| 7 | Data Calling (e.g. 1300 Hz) | Simple | +| 8 | Local Phone On/Off-hook | Simple | +| 9 | Presumed Hangup (SILENCE) Time-out | Simple | + +**Table 1/V.253 – Events detectable in the voice mode (concluded)** + +| Event number | Event description | Event reporting | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| +| 10 | Presumed End of Message (QUIET) Time-out | Simple | +| 11 | SIT Signal | Simple, Message | +| 12 | Bong Tone | Simple | +| 13 | Loop Current Interruption | Simple | +| 14 | Loop Current Polarity Reversal | Simple | +| 15 | Call Waiting Beep/Interrupt | Simple | +| 16 | Distinctive Call Waiting | Pattern | +| 17 | 5-bit (Baudot) TDD (Annex A/V.18) modulation detected | Simple | +| 18 | Ringing Tone | Simple | +| 19 | BUSY | Simple | +| 20 | DIALTONE | Simple | +| 21 | Reorder/Fast Busy | Simple | +| 22 | V.21 Channel 2 7E flags | Simple | +| 23 | Transmit Buffer Underrun | Simple | +| 24 | Extension Phone On/Off-hook | Simple | +| 25 | Facsimile or Data Answer (e.g. 2100 Hz) | Simple | +| 26 | Data Answer (e.g. 2225 Hz) | Simple | +| 27 | Voice Detect | Simple | +| 28 | Call Waiting plus Caller Id. (CIDCW) | Message | +| 29 | Stuttered Dialtone | Simple (Note) | +| 30 | Invalid Voice Data Format | Simple | +| 31 | Lost Data Detected Event | Simple | +| 32 | Facsimile Answer | Simple | +| 33 | CAS tone detection | Simple | +| 34 | EDT TDD (Annex C/V.18) modulation detected | Simple | +| 35-63 | Reserved for future standardization | Reserved | +| Above 63 | Manufacturer specific | Manufacturer defined | +| NOTE – The use of complex event reporting for Stuttered Dialtone is for further study. | | | + +## 5.2 Actions (commands sent to the DCE) + +Table 2 summarizes the actions possible in Voice Transmit State or Voice Receive State. This table also includes additional entries for AT-style commands because these commands relate to the simple action commands. This table also lists whether the DTE selects the action by an AT-style command, or by a shielded command during voice transmission. + +The first column of Table 2 lists the action number assignment for each event. These numbers are used for reference only. Note that the DCE must support action numbers 0 and 1 if the DCE supports adjustable setting in the +VGT command. Note that the DCE must support action numbers 3 and 4 if + +the DCE supports adjustable setting in the +VGR command. Note that action numbers 8 through 13 are mandatory. + +The third column of Table 2 lists whether a single character is enough to invoke the action, or if the DTE must supply a more complicated command. The description Simple indicates a single character command ( shielded), and Command indicates that the DTE issues the command as an AT-style command. + +See Table 12 for a list of the event code assignments (commands). + +**Table 2/V.253 – Simple actions in the voice mode** + +| Action number | Action | Command accepted | +|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------| +| 0 | Volume increase (Voice Transmit and Voice Duplex States);
Gain increase (Voice Speakerphone State). | Simple | +| 1 | Volume decrease (Voice Transmit and Voice Duplex States);
Gain decrease (Voice Speakerphone State). | Simple | +| 2 | Set Volume (Voice Transmit and Voice Duplex States);
Set Gain (Voice Speakerphone State). | Command | +| 3 | Gain increase (Voice Receive, Voice Duplex, and Voice Speakerphone States). | Simple | +| 4 | Gain decrease (Voice Receive, Voice Duplex, and Voice Speakerphone States). | Simple | +| 5 | Set gain (Voice Receive, Voice Duplex, and Voice Speakerphone States). | Command | +| 6 | Start Voice Receive State | Command | +| 7 | End Voice Receive State | Simple | +| 8 | Start Voice Transmit State | Command | +| 9 | Pause Voice Transmit State | Simple | +| 10 | Resume Voice Transmit State | Simple | +| 11 | End Voice Transmit State | Simple | +| 12 | Clear transmit buffer of voice data | Simple | +| 13 | Concatenate transmit data streams | Simple | +| 14 | Buffer Size Inquiry | Simple | +| 15 | Receive abort | Simple | +| 16 | Transmit CAS tone | Simple | +| 17 | Manufacturer specific | | +| 18 | Manufacturer specific | | +| 19 | Manufacturer specific | | +| 20 | Manufacturer specific | | +| 21 | Manufacturer specific | | + +**Table 2/V.253 – Simple actions in the voice mode (concluded)** + +| Action number | Action | Command accepted | +|---------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 22 | Start Voice Duplex State | Command | +| 23 | End Voice Duplex State | Simple | +| 24 | Start Voice Speakerphone State | Command | +| 25 | End Voice Speakerphone State | Simple | +| 26 | Enable Event Reports in the Voice Speakerphone State | Command | + +## **5.3 Call discrimination** + +### **5.3.1 Description and definitions** + +This Recommendation provides the means for the DCE to supply all of the necessary information and DCE control for the DTE to implement a Voice/Fax/Data call discrimination algorithm. A general description of the necessary DCE requirements to perform call discrimination, as provided for in this Recommendation, is given below. + +- 1) The DCE provides a method for switching modes, that does not change the parameters of the mode being left. +- 2) The DCE provides the means for the smooth transition between data, facsimile, and voice during the same call. +- 3) The DCE provides the means to disable or enable the automatic hangup as the normal default behaviour when switching to a Data or Facsimile Mode from the Voice Mode. This allows for DTE directed call discrimination and the transfer to Voice-unaware software. +- 4) The DCE provides a method, for automatic fallback to Class 0 operation, from Voice Command State at the expiration of a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer. +- 5) The DCE provides a method to start a particular protocol (or handshake), once the DCE enters a data or facsimile mode. + +### **5.3.2 Hook control under voice** + +As part of the call discrimination algorithm, the DCE may be switched to other Modes, such as facsimile or data, in order to try handshakes in those Modes. The DTE performs the Mode switching through a combination of the **+FCLASS** and **+VNH** commands. The DTE may issue these commands anytime the DCE is in command mode, even while off-hook. While the **+FCLASS** command does the Mode switching, the **+VNH** controls whether the DCE remembers that it answered the phone while in the Voice Mode and that the DCE shall not hang up the Telco line if the handshake fails or if the DCE performs some other operation that would have normally resulted in a hangup of the phone line. + +The purpose of leaving **+VNH=0** after the **+FCLASS** switch is to allow the DTE, running Voice-aware software and determining that the remote station is not voice, to switch to software that has no knowledge of any voice determination efforts, and that is only aware of facsimile or data operations. This switching-in operation implies that the newly switched-in software will not go back to the Voice-aware software, nor switch from the data to facsimile operation (or visa versa) to try another handshake. + +The purpose of leaving **+VNH=1** after the **+FCLASS** switch is to allow the DTE, running Voice-aware software and determining that the remote station is not voice, to command the DCE to attempt handshaking in other Modes (different **+FCLASS** settings). In this case, the DTE does not expect to switch to software that has no knowledge of any voice determination efforts, and that is only aware of facsimile or data operations. + +The DCE response to reset events, listed below, for **+VNH=0** and **+VNH=1**, are the same; the difference between the commands is that **+VNH=1** inhibits DCE-initiated hangups. For example, a **+VNH=1** command would inhibit the go on-hook behaviour from an EIA-592 compliant DCE while still producing the **+FHS:00OK** response. The DCE responses to events not listed are dependent on the DCE. A Yes in the second column means that the DCE goes on-hook (**+VLS=0**). A Yes in the third column means that the DCE shall enable automatic rate detection and switch to Data Mode (**+FCLASS=0**). + +| Reset event | On-hook | Data mode | +|------------------------------------------------------------|---------|-----------| +| DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer expires (Voice Mode only) | Yes | Yes | +| DTR drop when &D2 is set (all applicable Modes) | Yes | Yes | +| DCE receives a ATH command (all applicable Modes) | Yes | Yes | +| DCE receives a ATZ command (all applicable Modes) | Yes | Yes | +| DCE power cycle | Yes | Yes | + +The purpose of leaving **+VNH=2** after the **+FCLASS** switch is to allow the DTE, running Voice-aware software and determining that the remote station is not voice, to switch to software that has no knowledge of any voice determination efforts, and that is only aware of facsimile or data operations. This implies that the Voice-aware software has a high degree of knowledge about the Voice-unaware software now in control, and has knowledge that the Voice-unaware software will eventually return control back to the Voice-aware software. When **+VNH=2**, the DCE shall perform the prescribed actions for the reset events listed below; the DCE responses to events not listed are dependent on the DCE. A Yes in the second column means that the DCE goes on-hook (**+VLS=0**), while a No means that the **+VLS** setting remains as is. A Yes in the third column means that the DCE shall enable automatic rate detection and switch to Data Mode (**+FCLASS=0**). + +| Reset event | On-hook | Data mode | +|------------------------------------------------------------|---------|-----------| +| DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer expires (Voice Mode only) | Yes | Yes | +| DTR drop when &D2 is set (all applicable Modes) | No | Yes | +| DCE receives a ATH command (all applicable Modes) | No | Yes | +| DCE receives a ATZ command (all applicable Modes) | No | Yes | +| DCE power cycle | Yes | Yes | + +For example, if the DTE switches the DCE from the **+FCLASS=8** voice mode to the **+FCLASS=0** data mode, the DTE would start the data handshake by issuing an **ATA** command. When **+VNH=0**, the DCE behaves as a Data Mode only DCE; the DCE would return a NO CARRIER result code and hang up the Telco line if the DCE did not detect a carrier. When **+VNH=1**, the DCE does not hang up the phone line when the DCE detects a no carrier condition, allowing the DTE to switch the DCE to another mode; the DCE would go on-hook upon receiving a reset event (i.e. an **ATH** command) listed above. + +While this subclause has concentrated on reception, note that the **+FCLASS** command and mode switching operation behave similarly for transmission. For example, the DTE can switch from the **+FCLASS=8** Voice Mode, when the DCE is off-hook, to the **+FCLASS=0** Data Mode; the DTE could then issue an **ATD** command to start a data connection. + +## 5.4 Timing marks in the voice data stream + +Timing Marks is a **** event code that the DCE periodically embeds in the receive voice data, and that represent a fixed time interval in the voice receive. The purpose of these marks is to allow the DTE to fast forward and reverse through a voice file. + +The Timing Mark may be followed in the data stream by information specific to the DCE manufacturer that allows the DCE to be able to initialize transmission at that point in the data stream (e.g. re-initialize its voice decompressors). If the voice data stream contains Timing Mark code words on the receive, the DTE shall include the code words in the exact place in the data stream where they originally occurred. The DTE shall never add extra Timing Marks. The method the DTE uses to accomplish this is beyond the scope of this Recommendation (as well as file format issues). If Timing Marks are present in the data stream, the data stream shall begin with a Timing Mark. + +If the DCE is using Silence Compression (and code words are present in the data stream) and is using Timing Marks for a receive operation, the DCE shall limit the time duration represented by each individual Silence Compression code words to ensure that the Timing Mark code word(s) occur at the time expected, thus maintaining the fixed time period associated with the Timing Mark. + +The DTE does not need Timing Marks for fast forward and rewind functions if the compression method contains: + +- 1) no Silence Compression; +- 2) a fixed compression ratio; and +- 3) no need for DCE re-initialization of the data decompressors. + +The DTE can easily compute the new position in the data stream with the knowledge of the sample rate and bits per sample. The DTE can query if the selected compression method uses Timing Marks by using the **+VSM=?** command. + +Timing marks are optional. + +## 5.5 Compression method and availability of event detection + +The DTMF/Tone detection capabilities, Silence Compression, and available sampling rates are dependent on the compression method selection. This allows for the DCE to allocate resources for producing or accepting very compressed data streams with the expected degradation in the number of reportable event detections. Since the DTMF/Tone detection capability of the DCE is dependent on the compression method selection, it is recommended that the DTE examine the event detection capabilities after every change of the compression method. + +# 6 Operation + +## 6.1 Numeric radix + +This Recommendation uses decimal for all commands and result codes requiring numerical representations, unless otherwise noted. + +## 6.2 Format conventions + +### 6.2.1 Numbering conventions + +The basic convention used in this Recommendation is illustrated below. The bits are grouped into octets. The bits of an octet are shown horizontally and are numbered from 0 to 7. Multiple octets are shown vertically and are numbered from 0 to n-1. + +![](79e1709a7317ead45379cbb8ff3ba802_img.jpg) + +| | | | | | | | | | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|-----------| +| 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | +| | | | | | | | | Octet 0 | +| | | | | | | | | Octet 1 | +| • | | | | | | | | | +| | | | | | | | | Octet n-1 | + +### 6.2.2 Order of bit transmission + +The octets are transmitted in ascending numerical order; inside an octet, bit 0 is the first bit to be transmitted. + +### 6.2.3 Code word mapping conventions + +When a code word is contained within a single octet, the lowest bit number of the code word represents the lowest-order value. + +When a code word spans more than one octet, the order of the bit values within each octet progressively decreases as the octet number increases. The lowest bit number associated with the code word represents the lowest-order value. + +For example, a bit number can be defined as a couple (o,b) where o is the octet number and b is the relative bit number within the octet. The figure below illustrates a field that spans from bit (0,2) to bit (1,6). The high-order bit of the field is mapped on bit (0,2) and low-order bit is mapped on bit (1,6). + +![](7ede87328f6b696dcffa65ebc4570cc8_img.jpg) + +| | | | | | | | | | +|-------|-------|---|---|---|-------|-------|-------|---------| +| 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | +| | | | | | $2^4$ | $2^3$ | $2^2$ | Octet 0 | +| $2^1$ | $2^0$ | | | | | | | Octet 1 | + +## 6.3 Command structure + +### 6.3.1 AT commands + +The Voice Mode uses a mixture of AT-style commands for parameter setting and initiating non-simple actions. The Voice Mode uses shielded codes (see 6.3.7) for simple actions and for event reporting in the Voice Transmit or Receive States. The operation of the AT-style commands follows the provisions in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +#### 6.3.1.1 Character set and format + +The T.50 character set is used for commands and responses. Only the low order 7 bits of each character are used; the high order bit is ignored. Uppercase characters are equivalent to lowercase characters. + +For the digitized voice data, the data are binary (not T.50 characters), transferred using 8 data bits without parity. It is therefore preferable to use character formatting with 8 data bits and no parity bit for all interactions to avoid the need to change formats when moving between the Voice Command State and the Data State. + +#### 6.3.1.2 DTE command lines + +A command line is a string of characters sent from a DTE to the DCE, while the DCE is in the Voice Command State. Command lines have a prefix, a body, and a terminator. The prefix consists of the T.50 characters "AT" (4/1, 5/4) or "at" (6/1, 7/4). The body is a string of commands and associated values, restricted to printable T.50 characters (2/0-7/14). Space character (T.50 2/0) and control characters other than (T.50 0/13) and (T.50 0/8) in the command string are ignored, except for space characters embedded within s. The terminator is the character. Characters that precede the AT prefix are ignored. The DCE shall support a command line of at least 40 characters, including embedded space characters. + +See also 5.2.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +### 6.3.2 Basic command syntax + +Characters within the command line are parsed as commands with associated parameter values. The basic commands consist of single characters, or single characters preceded by a prefix character (e.g. "&"), followed by a decimal parameter. Missing numeric parameters are evaluated as 0. + +See also 5.3.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +### 6.3.3 Extended command syntax + +The voice commands, which are preceded by the +V characters, described in this Recommendation uses the extended syntax described in 5.5/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). These commands are terminated by the semicolon ";" character (T.50 3/11) or by the that terminated the command line. The general formats of extended commands follow. + +Each Extended Command, either a Configuration or an Action command, may use a compound parameter, which refers to the additional information needed by the command to execute to completion. A complete compound parameter string consists of one or more subparameters separated by comma characters (T.50 2/12). Incomplete compound parameter strings are not allowed. + +The DTE must supply the correct number and type (string or numeric) of subparameters required by the command (Action commands may take a parameter). An error occurs when: + +- 1) attempting to use a string value where a numeric subparameter is required; +- 2) using a numeric value where a string subparameter is required; +- 3) using a parameter consisting of numeric and string values where a single value is required; +or +- 4) using a single numeric or a single string parameter where a multiple subparameters are required. + +For any of these error conditions, the DCE shall return an ERROR final result code. + +The following table summarizes the parameters associated with the Action Command Syntax. + +| Syntax | Associated parameter values | +|-------------------------------|------------------------------| +| Execute Action Command Syntax | and | +| Test Action Command Syntax | and | + +The following table summarizes the parameters associated with the Configuration Command Syntax. + +| Syntax | Associated parameter values | +|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------| +| Set Configuration Command Syntax | and | +| Read Configuration Command Syntax | and | +| Test Configuration Command Syntax | and | + +#### 6.3.3.1 Action command syntax + +##### 6.3.3.1.1 Execute action command syntax + ++V[=]; or + ++V[=] + +If +V is supported, the DCE shall execute the command as described in the command reference. Otherwise, it shall report an ERROR result code. Some action commands support use of a , as an action parameter. For some of these action commands, the may be omitted. + +See also 5.4.3.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +##### 6.3.3.1.2 Test action command syntax + ++V=? + +This syntax is used by the DTE to test if an action command is implemented by the DCE, and if so to determine the range of s supported for that command, if any. If +V is supported, the DCE shall report an OK result code; otherwise, it shall report an ERROR result code. If supports s, the DCE shall report the (see 6.3.3.4.2) or (see 6.3.3.4.3) to the DTE, followed by a final result code (see 6.3.6). + +See also 5.4.3.2/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +#### 6.3.3.2 Configuration command syntax + +##### 6.3.3.2.1 Set configuration command syntax + ++V=; or + ++V= + +If +V is supported, and if the or is supported, the DCE shall set the parameter to the specified value. Otherwise, it shall report an ERROR result code, and the previous value or values shall be unaffected. + +See also 5.4.4.2/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +##### 6.3.3.2.2 Read configuration command syntax + ++V? + +If +V is supported, the DCE shall report the current , , or a list of separated by to the DTE. Otherwise, it shall report an ERROR result code. + +See also 5.4.4.3/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +##### 6.3.3.2.3 Test configuration command syntax + ++V=? + +This syntax is used by the DTE to test if a parameter is implemented, and if so list all valid values for the parameter, in a format specific to the individual parameter. If +V is supported, the DCE shall report the (see 6.3.3.4.2) or (see 6.3.3.4.3) to the DTE. Otherwise, it shall report an ERROR result code. + +See also 5.4.4.4/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +#### 6.3.3.3 Single value parameter strings + +##### 6.3.3.3.1 Numeric constants + +Decimal s shall be made up of the T.50 characters "0" through "9" (3/0-3/9). Leading "0" characters shall be ignored by the DCE. + +Hexadecimal s shall be made up of the T.50 characters "0" through "9" (3/0-3/9) and "A" through "F" (4/1-4/6) inclusive. Leading "0" characters shall be ignored by the DCE, unless acting as a place holder to accurately represent bit positions within a binary number (e.g. a mask where each bit position represents an action that may be enabled or disabled). + +See also 5.4.2.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +The +FCLASS parameter defines that also includes embedded "." (T.50 2/14) period characters, for delimiting revisions. + +##### 6.3.3.3.2 String constants + +s shall consist of a string of characters bounded at the beginning and end by the double-quote character (T.50 2/2). A null string (a string of zero length) is represented by two adjacent double-quote characters (""). String parameters defined in this Recommendation shall contain neither double-quote characters nor non-displayable characters, so no provisions are made for including them in s. + +See also 5.4.2.2/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +##### 6.3.3.3.3 Parameter values + +A shall consist of either a or a . + +#### 6.3.3.4 Compound parameter strings + +##### 6.3.3.4.1 Compound values + +A shall consist of a series of two or more s separated by commas. + +See also 5.4.2.3/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +##### 6.3.3.4.2 Range of values + +In response to command testing, the DCE shall present a to the DTE as an ordered list, preceded by a left parenthesis character ["(" T.50 2/8], and followed by a right parenthesis character [")" T.50 2/9]. The ordered list shall consist of a single , a set of s separated by commas ("," T.50 2/12) (e.g. "0,2" ), or as two s separated by a hyphen ("-" T.50 2/13) (e.g. 0-FF) to represent a continuous range of values. + +See also 5.7.3.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +NOTE – The +FCLASS=? is an exception. Parentheses and hyphens are not permitted, for compatibility with Recommendations T.31 and T.32. + +##### **6.3.3.4.3 Compound range of values** + +In response to the testing of compound commands, the DCE shall report a . This string is an ordered list of individual subparameter s, separated by commas. Individual subparameter s are presented as specified in 6.3.3.4.2 above, including parenthesis (T.50 2/8 and 2/9). This format is illustrated below. + +(1st range of values), ... (last range of values) + +See also 5.7.3.2/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +### **6.3.4 Issuing commands** + +See 5.5/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +All characters in a command line shall be issued at the same data rate, and with the same number of bits per character. + +If the DCE detects a command line which is not properly terminated (see 6.3.1.2), it shall ignore the commands, and generate an ERROR result code. In command mode, the DCE shall ignore any characters received from the DTE that are not part of a properly-formatted command line. + +The DCE shall issue no unsolicited result codes to the DTE during reception of a command line (i.e. between receipt of the first character of the prefix and the last character of the command line). See 7.2 regarding event report restrictions. + +If the DCE provides a facility for echo of command lines, it is recommended that this facility be disabled by the DTE during Voice Mode operation. If the Packet Protocol (Recommendation T.32) is in use, the DCE shall not echo command lines. + +The DTE shall not issue a new command line until the DCE has finished delivering the complete final result code to the previous command line, including any following and characters. + +### **6.3.5 Command execution** + +See 5.6/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +Upon receipt of the termination character, the DCE shall commence execution of the commands in the command line, if any. The DCE shall execute the commands in the body of the command line left-to-right. Each command is individually executed regardless of what follows on the line. If all commands execute properly, a final result code, for the final command, is issued after execution of the final command. If an invalid command is encountered, or if execution of any command results in an error, execution of the command line is terminated at that point and all subsequent commands on the line are ignored. Commands in the line prior to the error will have already been executed. + +#### **6.3.5.1 Command execution time** + +Configuration commands are assumed to execute instantaneously; these cannot be aborted. Action commands which require time to execute (see 10.1.5) may be aborted while in progress, until the final result code is issued (see 6.3.6). + +#### **6.3.5.2 Aborting commands** + +Commands which may be aborted are explicitly noted in the description of the command. When such an aborting event is recognized by the DCE, it shall terminate the command in progress and return an OK result code to the DCE. + +See also 5.6.1/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +#### 6.3.5.3 Use of the semicolon + +The DCE shall permit and parse multiple non-Action commands, separated by semicolons, on a command line. The DCE shall parse the command line left-to-right until the DCE has processed the entire command line, or until the DCE detects an error condition, at which time, the DCE shall terminate processing, and discard the remainder of the unprocessed command line. + +### 6.3.6 DCE responses from AT commands + +This Recommendation uses similar final and intermediate result codes as defined in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). The Voice Mode form of the V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) unsolicited result codes are very different. This Recommendation refers to the following V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) defined result codes. See Table 3. + +**Table 3/V.253 – Voice result codes from V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*)** + +| Result code | Numeric equivalent | Description of voice mode version | +|----------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| OK | 0 | The DCE completed the previous command or operation normally, and is now ready for another command. | +| CONNECT | 1 | The DCE successfully enters the Data State | +| RING | 2 | | +| NO CARRIER | 3 | Disallowed in Voice Mode | +| ERROR | 4 | The DCE did not recognize the command, detected a parameter error, or the operation completed abnormally. The DCE is ready for another command. | +| NO DIALTONE | 6 | Disallowed in Voice Mode | +| BUSY | 7 | | +| NO ANSWER | 8 | The DCE issues this result code when the DCE has continuously detected Ringing Tone for the S7 specified amount of time | +| CONNECT | Manufacturer specific | Disallowed in Voice Mode | + +### 6.3.7 Data stream transparent commands ( Shielded) + +This Recommendation provides a means to issue commands from the DTE to the DCE (action commands), and reports from the DCE to the DTE (event reports) in the data stream. These commands and reports are denoted in the data stream by the use of the T.50 (1/0) character followed by a character that represents the actual command or a report (additional data may occur after the event). The character, when found as part of the data stream, is denoted by the followed by the character that indicates a single in the data stream. These characters are octet-aligned. This method is based on ISO 2111. + +NOTE – The characters in are defined in Recommendation T.50. + +#### 6.3.7.1 DCE-to-DTE streams + +The DCE shall apply the following rules: + +- 1) Insert event reports into the data stream using the format. +- 2) Examine processed received data characters and insert a character ahead of each <1/0> data character. +- 3) Examine processed received data characters and if the DCE detects two consecutive <1/0> data characters, the DCE may substitute for the aforementioned data characters. + +The DTE monitors the data stream and removes all character pairs beginning with (treating the code character after the as a message to act upon), and applies the following rules: + +- 1) If the message character is <1/0>, the DTE re-inserts <1/0> into the data stream. +- 2) If the message character is , the DTE re-inserts into the data stream. +- 3) If the message character is a special character intended to mark special portions of the data (, , and <~>; see Table 10), the DTE re-inserts the into the data stream. + +| Example data stream | DCE Operation | DTE operation | +|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| abcde | abcdef
(DCE inserts an event report) | abcdef
(DTE removes event report) | +| abc<1/0>def | abc<1/0>def
(DCE adds code) | abc<1/0>def
(DCE stores) | +| ab<1/0><1/0>def | abdef
(DCE replaces with ) | abdef
(DCE stores) | +| abcde | abcTdef
(DCE inserts special code) | abcTdef
(DCE stores) | + +#### 6.3.7.2 DTE-to-DCE streams + +The DTE shall apply the following rule: + +- Insert transparent commands into the data stream by using the format. + +The DCE monitors the data stream and removes all character pairs beginning with (treating the code character after the as a message to act upon), and applies the following rules: + +- 1) If the message character is <1/0>, the DCE re-inserts <1/0> into the data stream. +- 2) If the message character is , the DCE re-inserts two consecutive <1/0> characters. +- 3) If the message character is a special character intended to mark special portions of the data (, , and <~>; see Table 10), the DCE inserts nothing and takes the appropriate action. + +| Example data stream | DTE Operation | DCE operation | +|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| +| abcdef | abcdef
(DTE inserts an action command) | abcdef
(DCE removes event report) | +| abc<1/0>def | abc<1/0>def
(DTE forwards) | abc<1/0>def
(DCE plays) | +| abdef | abdef
(DTE forwards) | ab<1/0><1/0>def
(DCE plays) | +| abcTdef | abcTdef
(DTE forwards) | abcdef
(DCE removes special code) | + +## 6.4 Session management + +### 6.4.1 Scope + +#### 6.4.1.1 +V commands + +As a general rule: + +- 1) the +V commands operate only while the DCE is in the Voice Mode (+FCLASS=8); and +- 2) the DCE does not accept Data Mode commands (+FCLASS=0) or Facsimile Mode commands (+FCLASS=1.0, 2.0, etc.). + +There are exceptions to these rules. In reference to item 1), there are several +V prefixed commands that will be accessible outside of the Voice Mode, most notably the Caller Id function. The exceptions are the +VCID, +VRID, +VDID, +VDR, +VDT, and the +VNH commands, which are valid in all Modes. In reference to item 2), the Voice Mode uses a number of commands with the +F prefix normally associated with the Facsimile Mode; the DCE enters the Voice Mode by receiving the +FCLASS=8.0 command. This Recommendation permits the use of ATD, ATH, +FCLASS, ATZ, +IFC, certain S-parameters, and the DCE Identification commands (+GMI?, +GMM?, and +GMR?) while the DCE is in the Voice Command State. + +#### 6.4.1.2 Voice state information + +The DCE shall maintain the Voice Mode information between mode changes. For example, if the DTE commands the DCE to leave the Voice Mode, enter the Data Mode (i.e. +FCLASS=0), perform some operations there, and later switch to the Voice Mode, the DTE shall find none of the voice parameters, such as the Sample Rate setting, different from before, unless a DCE reset event occurs. See 5.3.2 for the list of defined reset events. + +#### 6.4.1.3 S-parameters + +This Recommendation permits sharing of compatible S-parameter definitions among the different modes. The S-parameter definitions intended for exclusive use in a given mode should have a distinct manufacturer specific S-parameter definition. The above mentioned conditions apply for all Voice, Facsimile, or Data Modes for all Recommendations, unless the Recommendation in question explicitly states otherwise, e.g. Service Class 2. + +NOTE – Is this true for T.32? + +The DCE shall return the ERROR result code to all DTE references to S-parameters that: + +- 1) are explicitly disallowed while in Voice Mode; or +- 2) have no effect on the DCE's operation while in the Voice Mode. For example, a DTE Data Mode only S-parameter reference shall cause the DCE to report the ERROR result code. + +See Table 4. + +**Table 4/V.253 – S-parameter usage definitions** + +| S-parameter | Description | +|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| S0 | Automatic answer disallowed in the Voice Mode | +| S3 | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| S4 | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| S5 | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| S6 | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| S7 | Wait for Carrier After Dial. Default: 60 seconds. In the Voice Mode, this register contains the maximum amount of time that the DCE shall wait during call origination, all the time detecting for Ringing Tone, before assuming that the remote station will not go off-hook. See 10.2.5 and 10.2.6 for related information. | +| S8 | As defined in Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| S10 | Automatic disconnect delay disallowed in the Voice Mode | + +#### 6.4.1.4 Other V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) commands + +The DCE shall return the ERROR result code to all disallowed V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) AT commands while in the Voice Mode. Table 5 lists V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) commands that: + +- 1) are disallowed while in Voice Mode; +- 2) have additional functionality while in Voice Mode; or +- 3) same functionality as Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +**Table 5/V.253 – V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) AT command operations while in voice mode** + +| AT command | Description | +|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| A | Disallowed in the Voice Mode; use the +VLS command (see 10.2.4). | +| D | See 9.1.1 | +| E | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| &F | Manufacturer specific | +| H0 or H | See 9.1.2 | +| H | Where is any integer greater than 0; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| I | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| L | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| M | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | + +**Table 5/V.253 – V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) AT command operations while in voice mode (concluded)** + +| AT command | Description | +|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| O | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| P | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| Q | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| T | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| X | Where is any integer or omitted; disallowed in the Voice Mode. | +| Z | Where is any integer or omitted (see 5.3.2) | +| &C | Same as Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) | +| &D | Where is any integer or omitted. Zero and two behave as described in Rec. V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ). One is disallowed in the Voice Mode. | + +#### 6.4.1.5 Dial action + +The Dial Action under the Voice Mode is the same as Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +### 6.4.2 Flow control + +#### 6.4.2.1 Methods + +Flow control is necessary to match the DTE-DCE data rate to the line signalling rate and to the requirements of analog conversion of the voice signals and data. In-band unidirectional DC1/DC3 (XON/XOFF) flow control is mandatory; flow control using V.24 circuits 106 and 133 is optional. Voice data with cardinal values of DC1 (1/1) or DC3 (1/3) shall not be interpreted as flow control commands. + +The DTE may turn off the above specified flow control methods, but some other method shall be used to avoid overrun of the DCE buffer. The credit method can be implemented using the <"?"> transparent data command character pair (see the simple action command in Table 12). In the receive direction, the DTE can use delayed Packet Protocol (clause 9/T.32) acknowledge characters for flow control. + +The response time of the DCE to indication of a DTE-not-ready condition shall not exceed 64 character times, as measured from the instant the DTE asserted the not-ready condition. The DCE shall further be prepared to accept at least 64 additional characters on circuit 103 at the instant it asserts a not-ready condition to the DTE. + +NOTE – A Voice DCE may provide additional data buffering beyond the needs of flow control. + +#### 6.4.2.2 Implicit selection + +The DTE can select the flow control method in the Voice Mode by using the +**IFC** command [defined in 6.2.12/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*)]. This Recommendation extends the +**IFC** command to allow some flow control inheritance. The selection of the flow control method is not global to all modes that the DCE may support, but the method is global, in a more limited sense, to those modes that are aware of the +**IFC** command. The DCE is not required to maintain the flow control method between power cycles. See 5.3.2 for the list of defined reset events. + +The scope of the **+IFC** command is given below. + +- 1) A state transition from a **+IFC** unaware mode to **+IFC** aware mode. The **+IFC** aware mode disregards the flow control method active in the other modes, and switches to the method selected by the **+IFC** command. The selected method is either the default, or the last selected setting. For example, if the DTE has not issued an **+IFC** command in any **+IFC** aware mode, the DCE shall use the normal default. +- 2) A state transition from a **+IFC** aware mode to another **+IFC** aware mode. The newly-selected **+IFC** aware mode shall inherit the flow control method active in the other mode. +- 3) A state transition from the **+IFC** aware mode to **+IFC** unaware mode. The DCE deselects the **+IFC** flow control method, and resumes the method active in the other mode before the switch to the **+IFC** aware mode. + +For interoperability with existing DTE, the DCE may also support the **+FLO** syntax, as defined in Annex A. + +### 6.4.3 Serial data interchange circuits + +#### 6.4.3.1 Mandatory circuits + +The following circuits are required: + +| V.24 circuit | Description | V.24 circuit | Description | +|--------------|---------------|--------------|------------------| +| 102 | Signal Ground | 103 | Transmitted Data | +| 104 | Received Data | | | + +#### 6.4.3.2 Optional circuits + +| V.24 circuit | Description | V.24 circuit | Description | +|--------------|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------| +| 133 | Ready for Receiving | 105 | Request to Send | +| 106 | Ready for Sending | 107 | Data Set Ready | +| 108/2 | Data Terminal Ready | 109 | Data Channel Received Line Signal Detector | +| 125 | Calling Indicator | | | + +Provision of additional circuits is optional. + +#### 6.4.3.3 Optional circuits behaviour + +The behaviour of Circuits 105, 106, and 133 is described in 6.2.12/V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). + +The behaviour of Circuit 108/2 is described as follows. An ON to OFF transition on 108/2 shall cause the DCE to disconnect the call and go on-hook, unless configured otherwise by the user. If the DCE provides the **&D** parameter [defined in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*)], this parameter shall also condition DCE behaviour while **+FCLASS=8.0**. The **&D0** setting shall cause the DCE to ignore transitions on circuit 108/2. The **&D1** is not permitted. The **&D2** setting shall cause the DCE to disconnect the call, and go on-hook, enter automatic rate detection operation, and switch to Data Mode, on an ON to OFF transition of circuit 108/2; the DCE shall do the above except to go on-hook when **+VNH=2**. Other values of the **&D** command are not defined in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) or in this Recommendation. + +The DCE may indicate incoming call on V.24 Circuit 125. + +When the DCE switches to **+FCLASS=0** operation, the behaviour of all control circuits shall be as specified by Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) and manufacturer-specific extensions and modifications. + +Circuit 107, if provided, shall normally be held in the ON condition at all times when the DCE is powered on and **+FCLASS=8**. Manufacturers may provide an option to cause Circuit 107 to obey the V.24 definition, which is for Circuit 107 to be ON only when the DCE is off-hook, and OFF when the DCE is on-hook. + +Circuit 109, if provided, shall normally be held in the ON condition at all times when the DCE is powered on and **+FCLASS=8**. Manufacturers may provide an option to cause Circuit 109 to be ON when the DCE is off-hook and OFF when the DCE is on-hook. The **&C** command, defined in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*), may be used for this purpose; the **&C0** setting holds circuit 109 always in the ON condition, and the **&C1** setting may be used to indicate the optional behaviour (indicating the on-hook/off-hook condition). + +### 6.4.4 DTE/DCE interface rate changes + +While the DCE is detecting the rate and parity and is in Voice Command State, the DCE shall issue responses using the same rate, word length, and parity as the most recent DTE command line. In the event that the DCE has received no DTE command, the rate, word length, and parity used will depend on the DCE's capabilities. When the DCE receives a fixed rate command that changes the operation from automatic rate detection to fixed-rate (word length and parity remain the same as determined from automatic rate detection or from other DCE capabilities), the change shall only occur after the complete DCE response. While the DCE is using fixed-rate operation and in Voice Command State, the DCE shall issue responses using the selected rate and utilize the same word length and parity determined before entering fixed-rate operation. In the event that the DCE has not determined the word length and parity, the word length and parity used will depend on the DCE's capabilities. When the DCE receives a fixed rate command that changes the operation from fixed-rate to automatic rate detection, the DCE shall resume the last rate, word length, and parity determined before entering fixed-rate operation. In the event that the DCE has not determined the rate, word length, and parity, the results depend on the DCE's capabilities. + +The DTE can enable or disable automatic rate detection and fixed-rate operation, while in the Voice Mode, by issuing the **+IPR** command. + +On entering the Voice Mode, the DCE shall execute an implied rate adjustment **+IPR** command using the rate from the Mode just exited. If the last Mode used automatic rate detection, the DCE would execute a **+IPR=0** command transparent to the DTE. If the last Mode used a fixed-rate, the DCE would execute the appropriate **+IPR** command to establish the same fixed-rate. In no event shall the DCE see separate result codes from the mode switch and the rate adjustment command. Assuming the Mode switch is successful, a rate adjustment failure for any reason shall cause the DCE to enter automatic rate detection operation. + +Once the DCE is using the fixed-rate operation, the DCE shall maintain this fixed rate for the duration of the Voice Mode or until: + +- 1) the DCE receives another **+IPR** command; or +- 2) the DCE rate changes as a side effect of another command, such as the **ATZ** command. + +See 5.3.2 for the list of defined reset events. + +On exiting the Voice Mode, the DCE shall execute an implied rate adjustment appropriate to the new Mode if such a command exists. If the Voice Mode used automatic rate detection, the DCE would execute an appropriate Enable Automatic Rate Detection command for the new mode transparently to the DTE. If the Voice Mode used a fixed-rate, the DCE would execute the appropriate fixed-rate command to establish the same fixed-rate. The DCE shall not do rate adjustments described above for those Modes that explicitly mandate: + +- 1) a certain rate; or +- 2) the DCE maintain and resume the rate across Mode transitions. + +Note that T.32 maintains that it is the DTE's responsibility to set the correct fixed-rate upon entering Facsimile Mode from the Voice Mode; the transition from voice to T.32 facsimile mode satisfies this requirement (i.e. not requiring a **+IPR** command). + +### **6.4.5 DTE/DCE inactivity timer** + +The purpose of this timer is to ensure that the DTE does not leave the DCE in a state that is inaccessible by Voice-unaware software. The DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer is activated when the DTE selects the voice fixed-rate. This timer expires if there is a cessation of the data stream from the DTE to the DCE, in the Voice Command State and in the Data State, for a DTE selectable time. On the expiration of this timer, the DCE shall switch to the Data Mode with automatic rate detection. The switch to automatic rate detection (and Data Mode) allows DTE Voice-unaware software to recover control of the DCE in the event of a catastrophic failure that does not result in a DCE power down. + +It is recommended that the DTE software leave the DCE in automatic rate detection (and Data Mode) operation, and use the DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer only as needed. Leaving the DCE in the automatic rate detection operation is an extra measure to prevent confusion resulting from Voice-unaware software accessing a DCE in the Voice Mode at a fixed DTE/DCE Interface Rate. The **ATH** command (see 9.1.2) does the switch to automatic rate detection and Data Mode automatically for these reasons. + +This Recommendation does not allow the DCE automatic answer feature, since this feature does not allow the DTE to set the DCE in the Voice Mode before answering the phone. + +If the particular DCE implementation does not have a Data Mode, the DCE shall not perform any Mode change upon the expiration of the DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer. If the particular DCE implementation does not support automatic rate detection, the DCE shall not change the fixed DTE/DCE Interface Rate. + +### **6.4.6 DCE implementations without data modes** + +If the given DCE does not have a Data Mode (i.e. **+FCLASS=0**) and the DCE is processing a command that usually switches the DCE to the Data Mode, either directly or as a side effect, the DCE shall perform the non-switching portions of the command, but stop any further processing of the command at the mode switch. The **ATH** (see 9.1.2) command is an example – the DCE would hang up the phone, enable automatic rate detection, but would not go to the Data Mode. + +If the given DCE does not have a Data Mode (i.e. **+FCLASS=0**) and the DCE detects an event that usually switches the DCE to the Data Mode, either directly or as a side effect, the DCE shall process the non-switching portions of the event, but stop any further processing of the command at the mode switch. The DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out event is an example – the DCE would hang up the phone, enable automatic rate detection, but would not go to the Data Mode. + +# 7 Events (unsolicited result codes) + +The form of the unsolicited result codes for the Voice Mode is very different from that defined in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*). This Recommendation refers to these events as event detection reports. + +Table 1 lists the events without any regard as to whether the DCE reporting of the event is optional or mandatory, and without assigning a DCE reporting mechanism. The next subclauses define simple shielded codes and a general message packet for reporting most of these events listed in Table 1. + +## 7.1 Forms of the event detection report + +### 7.1.1 Simple event detection report + +The DCE shall use the simple report format when one character is enough to report an event (e.g. RING). The form of the report is , where can be one of the possible character values listed in Table 10. The parameter "X " has a special significance, and is defined in 7.1.2. + +### 7.1.2 Complex event detection report + +The DCE shall use the complex report format when one character is not enough to report an event (e.g. RING), or a response to an action (e.g. Buffer Space Inquiry ?). **As a general rule, all multi-character data responses will follow this report format.** The form of the report is X<.>, where is a data or text string, and <.> is the data packet terminator. If a single character is sufficient to report an event, the DCE shall use the simple report format defined above. + +See the Caller Id example, Example 2 in 9.2.3.1.3, for an example of this format. + +The shall present data in one of the three possible formats. Multiple forms may appear in the same parameter. The DCE may place (0/10) characters in the . + +For those complex events that can be reported in Service Classes other than Class 8, such as Caller ID and Distinctive Ring, the reports are displayed without the prefix or the <.> suffix in Classes other than Class 8. See Example 2 in 9.2.3.1.3. See Table 6. + +**Table 6/V.253 – Valid response forms for the complex event report** + +| | | +|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| = | Where identifies the data type, "=" is T.50 3/13, is a specific data instance, and is T.50 0/13. Table 7 lists the permitted tags. | +| | Where are V.250 (ex-V.25 ter ) formatted result codes, and T.50 0/13. | +| | Where is T.50 0/13. This form is a null message. | + +Manufacturer-specific data shall always use the = format with the manufacturer-specific identifier. + +**Table 7/V.253 – Valid tags for the complex event report** + +| Tag | Description | +|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| TIME | Table 13 | +| DATE | Table 13 | +| NMBR | Table 13 | +| NAME | Table 13 | +| MESG | Table 13 | +| ERRM | Table 8. Note that this tag is not limited to exclusive use for Caller Id. | +| DRON | Distinctive Ring Cadence On-time. See 10.3.1. | +| DROF | Distinctive Ring Cadence Off-time. See 10.3.1. | +| CPON | Control Tone Cadence On-time. See 10.3.2. | +| CPOF | Control Tone Cadence Off-time. See 10.3.2. | +| CWON | Call Waiting Cadence On-time. See 10.3.1. | +| CWOF | Call Waiting Cadence On-time. See 10.3.1. | +| ASTB | Table 12 | +| NDID | DID Services. See 9.2.4. | +| SITT | Table 9 | +| Z??? | (??? Manufacturer's choice) Manufacturer specific | + +Table 8 describes the currently defined values for the ERRM tag (i.e. < = >). + +**Table 8/V.253 – Defined values for the ERRM tag** + +| | Description | +|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------| +| ICLID_202 | See 9.2.3 | +| CIDCW_202 | See 9.2.3; see also Table 10 g (6/7). | +| Z | ( manufacturer's choice) Manufacturer specific | +| Other text strings | Reserved for future standardization | + +DCE shall report SITT with the simple event report <"J"> (Table 10). DCE which can distinguish different types of SIT Signals shall also transmit a complex event report, using the = format, using values defined in Table 9 below: + +**Table 9/V.253 – Defined values for the SITT tag** + +| <data> | Description | +|---------------------|-------------------------------------| +| ICNT | Intercept Tone | +| VCCT | Vacant Code Tone | +| REOT | Reorder Tone | +| NCDT | No Circuit Detected Tone | +| TON4 | Fourth SIT Signal Number | +| TON5 | Fifth SIT Signal Number | +| TON6 | Sixth SIT Signal Number | +| TON7 | Seventh SIT Signal Number | +| Other text strings | Reserved for future standardization | + +## 7.2 Event reports restrictions + +The DTE must expect these codes at any time and in any state – Command or Data State – while in the Voice Mode. The DCE may return the event detection reports right after the OK result code from the +FCLASS command. + +The DCE shall not embed event detection reports within result codes [V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) definitions] – either final (e.g. between the "O" and the "K" in the result code OK), intermediate (e.g. between the "T" and the in the result code CONNECT), or unsolicited (e.g. between and ). The DCE may embed the event detection reports within the information responses [V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*) definitions] from the DCE, such as the responses from the +VSM=? command or the DCE Identification commands. See 6.3.4 for considerations about issuing commands. + +The DCE may also embed one or more Simple Event Detection Report (see 7.1.1) within the data portion of a Complex Event Detection Report as long as the DCE does not place the Simple Event Detection Report between the and of a shielded character pair. + +## 7.3 shielded event codes sent to the DTE + +Table 10 is the list of the shielded code assignments for simple event detection reports, complex event report header, and other codes. + +This Recommendation defines the following shielded codes for the Voice Mode. Table 10 lists the valid values of in the expression . The number in parenthesis in the first column corresponds to the T.50 equivalent. The expression [Event Number ] refers to the numbering scheme used in Table 1. + +**Table 10/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DTE** + +| Code | Event Report Description | +|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| (1/0) | Two contiguous codes indicate a single in the data stream | +| (1/10) | in the data stream | +| (0/3) | End Data State. The DCE sends this code to signify the end of the voice data. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| Q (5/1) | Data stream shielded XON character. Used in the Packet Protocol. | +| S (5/3) | Data stream shielded XOFF character. Used in the Packet Protocol. | +| M (4/13) | Data stream shielded SOH code used for the Packet Protocol | +| W (5/7) | Data stream shielded ETB code used for the Packet Protocol | +| F (4/6) | Data stream shielded ACK code used for the Packet Protocol | +| U (5/5) | Data stream shielded NAK code used for the Packet Protocol | +| G (4/7) | Data stream shielded ENQ code used for the Packet Protocol | +| T (5/4) | Timing Mark. See 5.4 for details. | +| X (5/8) | Packet Header for the "Complex Event Detection Report" (additional event data transfers to the DTE) | +| . (2/14) | Packet Terminator for the "Complex Event Detection Report" (additional event data transfers to the DTE) | +| / (2/15) | Start of DTMF tone shielding (see 7.6) | +| ~ (7/15) | DTMF transitions to off (see 7.5 and 7.6) | +| R (5/2) | [Event Number 3] Ring. The shielded version of the RING result code. | +| 1 (3/1) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 1 (see 7.5) | +| 2 (3/2) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 2 (see 7.5) | +| 3 (3/3) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 3 (see 7.5) | +| 4 (3/4) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 4 (see 7.5) | +| 5 (3/5) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 5 (see 7.5) | +| 6 (3/6) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 6 (see 7.5) | +| 7 (3/7) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 7 (see 7.5) | +| 8 (3/8) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 8 (see 7.5) | +| 9 (3/9) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 9 (see 7.5) | +| 0 (3/0) | [Event Number 4] DTMF 0 (see 7.5) | +| A (4/1) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF A (see 7.5) | +| B (4/2) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF B (see 7.5) | +| C (4/3) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF C (see 7.5) | +| D (4/4) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF D (see 7.5) | +| * (2/10) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF E (see 7.5) | +| # (2/3) | [Event Number 4] Extended Keypad DTMF F (see 7.5) | + +**Table 10/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DTE (continuation)** + +| Code | Event Report Description | +|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| o (6/15) | [Event Number 5] Receive Buffer Overrun. The DCE shall disregard the latest voice data in favour of the oldest voice data in the DCE's buffer. The DCE shall place the code at the end of the buffer, thus marking the place where the data lost. The DCE shall not continuously send this code. After the end of an overrun condition (data flow to the DCE to the DTE begins again), the DCE shall allow an implementation specific amount of empty space in the voice data buffer, before the DCE can send the code again. This code does not indicate how much contiguous data the DCE lost, but does report multiple gaps of data. | +| c (6/3) | [Event Number 6] Facsimile Calling. The DCE uses an implementation specific means to detect a calling facsimile device. The DCE may use the T.30 1100 Hz tone and cadence information to make the determination (the actual detection criterion is implementation specific), or other methods as they become available. If the DCE continues to detect a facsimile calling device, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 4.0 seconds. | +| e (6/5) | [Event Number 7] Data Calling. The DCE uses an implementation specific means to detect a calling data device. The DCE may use the V.25 1300 Hz tone and cadence information to make the determination (the actual detection criterion is implementation specific), or other methods as they become available. If the DCE continues to detect a data calling device, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 4.0 seconds. | +| h (6/8) | [Event Number 8] Line current break (local phone goes on-hook) | +| H (4/8) | [Event Number 8] Line current detected (local phone goes off-hook) | +| s (7/3) | [Event Number 9] "Presumed Hangup" (SILENCE) Time-out. If the DCE continues to detect SILENCE, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than the time period specified by the +VSD command. The detection criterion is implementation specific. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| q (7/1) | [Event Number 10] "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET) Time-out. If the DCE continues to detect QUIET, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than a time period specified by the +VSD command. The detection criterion is implementation specific. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| J (4/10) | [Event Number 11] SIT Signal; see also 7.1.2 for complex reporting. | +| \$ (2/4) | [Event Number 12] Calling Card (Bong) Tone | +| l (6/12) | [Event Number 13] Loop Current Interruption. This usually indicates a remote hangup. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| L (4/12) | [Event Number 14] Loop Current Polarity Reversal. This may indicate a hang-up depending on the implementation of the central office. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| w (7/7) | [Event Number 15] Call Waiting/Beep Interrupt | +| t (7/4) | [Event Number 17] 5-bit (Baudot) TDD (Annex A/V.18) modulation detected | +| r (7/2) | [Event Number 18] Ringing Tone. See 3.9. | + +**Table 10/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DTE (continuation)** + +| Code | Event Report Description | +|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| b (6/2) | [Event Number 19] BUSY. If the DCE continues to detect BUSY, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 4.0 seconds. The detection criterion is implementation specific. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| d (6/4) | [Event Number 20] DIALTONE. If the DCE continues to detect DIALTONE, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 3.0 seconds. The detection criterion is implementation specific. See Table 11 for a more complete discussion of this response code. | +| K (4/11) | [Event Number 21] Reorder/Fast Busy | +| N (4/14) | [Event Number 22] V.21 Channel 2 7E flags | +| u (7/5) | [Event Number 23] Transmit Buffer Underrun. The DCE shall report this code if the DCE's buffer becomes empty without first receiving a or a command. See Table 12 for a more complete discussion of these commands. The DCE shall generate analog silence while the buffer is in the Underrun condition. The DCE shall continue in the voice transmit mode. The DCE shall buffer an implementation specific amount of voice data, before the DCE can resume sending the voice data over to the analog destination. This buffering is to insure a clean restart of the voice transmission. | +| p (7/0) | [Event Number 24] Line voltage increase (extension phone goes on-hook) | +| P (5/0) | [Event Number 24] Line voltage decrease (extension phone goes off-hook) | +| a (6/1) | [Event Number 25] Facsimile or Data Answer. The DCE uses an implementation specific means to detect a answering facsimile or data device (the DCE receives information that the answering device is one or the other). The DCE may use the V.25/T.30 2100 Hz answer tone and cadence information to make the determination (the actual detection criterion is implementation specific), or other methods as they become available. If the DCE continues to detect a facsimile or data answering device, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 0.5 seconds. | +| f (6/6) | [Event Number 26] Data Answer. The DCE uses an implementation specific means to detect a answering data device (the DCE receives information that the answering device is one or the other). The DCE may use the Bell 2225 Hz answer tone and cadence information to make the determination (the actual detection criterion is implementation specific), or other methods as they become available. If the DCE continues to detect a data answering device, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 4.0 seconds. | +| V (5/6) | [Event Number 27] Voice Detection – high confidence of voice. The DCE, by some implementation specific process, has determined, with a high probability, that the activity on the line is voice. | +| v (7/6) | [Event Number 27] Voice Detection – low confidence of voice. The DCE, by some implementation specific process, has determined, with a low probability, that the activity on the line is voice. | +| g (6/7) | [Event Number 28] CIDCW (Caller ID Call Waiting); see also Table 11 for complex reporting. | +| i (6/9) | [Event Number 29] Stuttered Dialtone | + +**Table 10/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DTE (concluded)** + +| Code | Event Report Description | +|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| E (4/5) | [Event Number 30] Invalid Voice Data Format. The DCE has determined that the voice data from the DTE is incompatible with the selected Voice Compression Method (see 10.2.8). The DCE shall issue this report only once voice data stream. | +| Y (5/9) | [Event Number 31] Lost Data Detected Event. The DCE has detected a loss of a data octet in the voice data stream from the DTE arising from some other source than a underrun or overrun. The DCE shall not continuously send this code. | +| m (6/13) | [Event Number 32] Facsimile Answer. The DCE uses an implementation specific means to detect a answering facsimile device. If the DCE continues to detect a facsimile answering device, the DCE may repeatedly report this event. The time interval between reports shall be no less than 0.5 seconds. | +| @ (4/0) | [Event Number 33] Reserved (CAS Tone detected) | +| n (6/14) | [Event Number 34] EDT TDD (Annex C/V.18) modulation detected | +| % (2/5) | [Event Number 63] Manufacturer specific | +| & (2/6) | [Event Number 48] Manufacturer specific | +| ' (2/7) | [Event Number 49] Manufacturer specific | +| ( (2/8) | [Event Number 50] Manufacturer specific | +| ) (2/9) | [Event Number 51] Manufacturer specific | +| All other 7-bit
T.50 characters | Reserved for future standardization | + +## 7.4 Minimum event reporting requirements + +The DCE shall support, at a minimum, Event Numbers 3, 4, 6, 18, 19, and 25 in Command Mode; Event Numbers 5, 9, and 10 in Voice Receive State; and Event Number 23 in Voice Transmit State. + +If the DCE supports the reporting of calling tone events, the DCE shall monitor the calling tones for the proper frequency, and cadences at the onset of the connection to the analog source/destination (e.g. telephone over the GSTN or connection to a handset locally connected to the DCE) for a period consistent with the expected duration, either as defined by other Recommendations or common industry practice, of the those supported calling tones. The onset of the connection can occur immediately on the switch, or after some delay, which is permitted or required by other Recommendations or common industry practice, by the protocol associated with the particular connection. After a time interval longer than the calling tone duration, the DCE is permitted to cease monitoring for calling tones. If a given implementation requires that one or more calling tones be monitored for the duration of the entire connection to the analog source/destination, it is recommended that the DCE implement a manufacturer-specific device in the +VLS command (see 10.2.4). + +If the DCE supports the reporting of answer tone events, the DCE shall monitor the answer tones for the proper frequency, and cadences at the onset of the connection to the analog source/destination (e.g. telephone over the GSTN or connection to a handset locally connected to the DCE) for a period consistent with the expected duration, either as defined by other Recommendations or common industry practice, of the those supported answer tones. The onset of the connection can occur immediately on the switch, or after some delay, which is permitted or required by other Recommendations or common industry practice, by the protocol associated with the particular + +connection. After a time interval longer than the answer tone duration, the DCE is permitted to cease monitoring for answer tones. If a given implementation requires that one or more answer tones be monitored for the duration of the entire connection to the analog source/destination, it is recommended that the DCE implement a manufacturer-specific device in the +VLS command (see 10.2.4). + +This Recommendation mandates that the DCE shall not detect a DTMF tone sooner than 25 milliseconds (see 7.6). The minimum tone length time for positive detection of other tones, not governed by other Recommendations, is unspecified. + +## 7.5 DTMF event report sequence + +Once the DCE has made a positive DTMF determination as described in 7.6, the DCE shall produce the corresponding DTMF event code every 70 milliseconds (including the 25-millisecond detection interval described in 7.6) until the DCE no longer detects the DTMF tone. The DCE shall produce the <~> event code on the transition from DTMF on-to-off. For example, if the DCE detects a DTMF 1, the DCE could produce the following sequence: <1><1><1><~>. The DCE shall produce the <~> event code before reporting another DTMF tone. + +## 7.6 Recorded DTMF tone on playback + +On a voice receive, a DCE shall alter, remove, or shield DTMF tones from the received data stream by one of the methods described below. The term eliminate means that the DCE may physically remove the data in question, or may change the data in question by removing the DTMF frequency components in said data. This Recommendation presumes that the DTMF determination period is greater than 25 milliseconds. + +- 1) Eliminate the entire DTMF tone burst from the voice data stream. +- 2) Eliminate a sufficient amount of the DTMF tone burst to leave no less than 25 milliseconds of digitized tone data. +- 3) Use the shielding procedure described below. +- 4) Use the shielding procedure and eliminate a sufficient amount of the DTMF tone burst to leave no less than 25 milliseconds of digitized tone data. + +The following describes the shielding procedure a DCE may employ. The DCE shall embed a code into the voice data stream to the DTE when the DCE has made a preliminary determination that the receive tone is a DTMF tone. One possible method of making this preliminary determination is when the DCE has detected the high frequency tone component; the actual method is manufacturer-specific. The DCE shall present this code no later than 25 milliseconds from the onset of the tone. If the DCE later determines, for the same tone burst, that the tone is not a DTMF tone, the DCE shall insert the <~> code to indicate the end of the determination interval (without any intervening DTMF codes). If the DCE later determines, for the same tone burst, that the tone is a DTMF tone, the DCE shall report the DTMF report sequence as described in 7.5. For example, if the DCE detects a DTMF 1, the DCE could produce the following sequence: <1><1><1><~>. The DCE shall produce the <~> event code before reporting another DTMF tone sequence. + +On a voice transmit, the DCE shall not report any DTMF detections upon receiving the code from the DTE until the DCE receives the <~> code from the DTE. This inhibiting of DTMF reporting shall cease upon a reset event, or until the DTE switches the DCE to the Voice Mode. DTE is permitted to use this method to disable DTMF tone event reports. + +The DCE is required to support the and the <~> codes on a voice transmit even if the DCE does not use the shielding procedure described above. + +## 7.7 Silence detection during voice receives + +The DCE may report the end of a voice receive operation in one of seven possible ways, and remains in the Data State for six of the event reports. The DCE switches to the Command State after the report. See Table 11 for the list of all of these possible event detection reports. This Recommendation mandates three of these reports: + +- 1) "Presumed Hangup" (SILENCE); +- 2) "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET); and +- 3) the report caused by the DTE issuance of a action command. + +This Recommendation mandates that the DCE shall monitor the analog source (or the digitized representation thereof) with the aim of detecting long periods of inactivity (i.e. silence). This inactivity indicates a possible end of the voice message during the voice receive operation. The actual means of characterizing the amount of activity from the analog source (i.e. long-term energy detection or other means) for periods of time indicated by the +VSD command (10.2.7), as well as the means for the exclusion of noise (i.e. clicks and pops) from the analysis are manufacturer specific. The reason for the DCE performing this function is because the DTE cannot, in the case of data compression, analyse the voice data stream. The DCE shall report the periods of sustained inactivity by issuing two possible event reports: + +- 1) "Presumed Hangup" (SILENCE); and +- 2) "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET) event reports. + +Table 11 describes these two reports and their differences. + +The DTE must know if there was any activity from the analog source for any appreciable time preceding the long period of inactivity (i.e. silence interval specified by the +VSD command) in the data stream, in order to properly perform call discrimination. For example, the DCE transmits the welcome message, goes to the Voice Receive State, and the DTE starts storing data. The DTE does not know if this recorded data has any voice content. If the DCE merely reported a long period of inactivity at some point in the operation, the DTE does not know if there was any voice activity on the line before the reported long period of silence. It is possible for the DTE to time the operation, but this Recommendation does not require timing on the DTE (but does not claim that DTE timing is not required). A long period of silence with no preceding activity may indicate a facsimile machine connected at the remote location (some facsimile machines do not send out calling tones), at which point the DTE may consider trying a facsimile handshake. + +See Table 10 for additional information on these event reports. The number in parenthesis in the first column corresponds to the T.50 equivalent. + +**Table 11/V.253 – Possible voice mode receive end of message determinations** + +| Code | Event report description | +|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ETX (0/3) | The DCE receives a from the DTE | +| s (7/3) | [Event Number 9] "Presumed Hangup (SILENCE) Time-out. The DCE has determined that, by means unspecified, there was never any appreciable activity from the analog source for a sufficient time before the start of sustained inactivity time interval from the analog source. The DTE may adjust the sensitivity and length of the inactivity time interval using +VSD command (see 10.2.7). | +| q (7/1) | [Event Number 10] "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET) Time-out. The DCE has determined that, by means unspecified, there was appreciable activity from the analog for a sufficient time before the start of sustained inactivity period from the analog source. The DTE may adjust the sensitivity and the length of the inactivity time interval using +VSD command (see 10.2.7). | +| l (4/9) | (ASCII 6C hex) [Event Number 13] Loop Current Interruption. The calling party controls this event, and the DCE shall consider the event as a remote hangup. | +| L (4/12) | [Event Number 14] Loop Current Polarity Reversal. The calling party controls this event, and the DCE shall consider the event as a remote hangup. | +| b (6/2) | [Event Number 19] BUSY. The DCE detects busy tone. | +| d (6/4) | [Event Number 20] DIALTONE. The DCE detects dial tone. | + +# 8 Actions + +The Voice Mode uses a mixture of AT-style commands for parameter setting and initiating actions, and shielded codes for simple actions in the Voice Transmit and Receive States. + +## 8.1 Simple action commands + +The DCE shall use the simple command format when one character is enough to initiate an action (e.g. Bump the transmit volume up by one). The form of this command is , where can be one of the possible character values listed in Table 12. + +## 8.2 Configuration setting and initiating action commands + +The DCE shall use these AT-style commands, while in Voice Command State, for configuration setting and initiating actions. These commands are covered in the next subclauses. + +## 8.3 codes sent to the DCE + +This Recommendation defines the following shielded codes for simple actions in the Voice Mode. Table 12 lists the valid values of in the expression . The expression [Action Number ] refers to the numbering scheme used in Table 2. The term "Immediate Command" in Table 12 means that the DCE shall take action upon receiving the command from the DTE. The term "Stream Command" in Table 12 means that the code keeps its position in the data stream; the DCE shall delay in taking the prescribed action until the DCE comes to that location in the DCE's normal processing of the data stream. + +The DCE shall consume unrecognized shielded codes, and give no indication of such action. The number in parenthesis in the first column corresponds to the T.50 equivalent. + +**Table 12/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DCE** + +| Code | Simple action command description | +|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| (0/0) | Do nothing. The DTE can use the code to refresh the DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer, instead of XON. | +| (1/0) | Two contiguous codes indicate a single in the data stream ("Immediate Command" or "Stream Command") | +| (1/10) | in the data stream ("Immediate Command" or "Stream Command") | +| Q (5/1) | Data stream shielded XON code used for the Packet Protocol | +| S (5/3) | Data stream shielded XOFF code used for the Packet Protocol | +| M (4/13) | Date stream shielded SOH code used for the Packet Protocol | +| W (5/7) | Date stream shielded ETB code used for the Packet Protocol | +| F (4/6) | Data stream shielded ACK code used for the Packet Protocol | +| U (5/5) | Data stream shielded NAK code used for the Packet Protocol | +| G (4/7) | Data stream shielded ENQ code used for the Packet Protocol | +| T (5/4) | Timing Marks (not generated by DTE). See 5.4. | +| / (3/12) | Start of DTMF tone shielding ("Immediate Command"). See 7.6. | +| ~ (2/15) | DTMF transitions to off ("Immediate Command"). See 7.5 and 7.6. | +| u (7/5) |

[Action Numbers 0 and 3] Increase the volume or gain by one unit ("Immediate Command").

For the Voice Transmit and Receive States, this simple command increases the volume or gain by one unit. If the DCE receives this code during a playback, the DCE shall increase its output volume by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data. If the DCE receives this code during a record, the DCE shall increase its input gain by one unit as applicable to the hardware configuration.

For the Voice Duplex State, this command increases the analog sink volume by one unit. The DCE shall increase its output volume by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data.

For the Voice Speakerphone State, this command increases the speaker gain by one unit.

The DCE shall ignore this command in the Voice Command State.

See 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 for additional requirements.

| +| d (6/4) |

[Action Numbers 1 and 4] Decrease the volume or gain by one unit ("Immediate Command").

For the Voice Transmit and Receive States, this simple command decreases the volume or gain by one unit. If the DCE receives this code during a playback, the DCE shall reduce its output volume by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data. If the DCE receives this code during a record, the DCE shall reduce its input gain by one unit as applicable to the hardware configuration.

For the Voice Duplex State, this command decreases the analog sink volume by one unit. The DCE shall decrease its output volume by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data.

For the Voice Speakerphone State, this command decreases the speaker gain by one unit.

The DCE shall ignore this command in the Voice Command State.

See 8.3.1 and 8.3.2. for additional requirements.

| + +**Table 12/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DCE** *(continuation)* + +| Code | Simple action command description | +|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +|
(1/11) | [Action Number 7] End
Voice Receive State ("Stream Command"). The DTE sends this code to stop sampling the voice signal and return to Command State. The DCE shall complete the transfer of the contents of its buffer followed by , switch to the Voice Command State, and return the OK result code. | +| p (7/0) | [Action Number 9] Pause
Voice Transmit State ("Immediate Command"). This code commands the DCE to suspend sending analog data to the currently selected analog destination. While paused, the DCE shall maintain the contents of its internal transmit buffer, the state of its compressors, continue in the Data State, and send silence over to the analog destination (to mark time). See 8.3.2 for additional requirements. | +| r (7/2) | [Action Number 10] Resume
Voice Transmit State ("Immediate Command"). This code commands the DCE to resume playing the contents of the DCE buffer to the currently selected output device. Before resuming the sending of analog data over to the analog destination, the DCE shall not reset the contents of its internal transmit buffer, nor reset its compressors. See 8.3.2 for additional requirements. | +| (0/3) | [Action Number 11] End Voice Transmit State ("Stream Command"). The DTE sends this code to signify the end of the voice data from the DTE, and return to Command State. The DCE shall complete the transmission of the contents of its buffer, before switching to the Voice Command State and returning the OK result code. | +| (1/8) | [Action Number 12] Clear transmit buffer of voice data ("Immediate Command"). This code commands the DCE to:
1) clear its internal transmit buffer;
2) make ready for a new voice data stream with the same parameters as the last stream; and
3) reset its compressors, and send silence over to the analog destination while paused (to mark time). See 8.3.2 for additional requirements. | +| (1/12) | [Action Number 13] Concatenate transmit data streams ("Stream Command"). The DTE sends this code to signify the start of a new voice data stream with the same parameters (i.e. sample rate) as the last stream without first returning to the Voice Command State. The DCE shall transmit the remainder of its internal transmit buffer, and reset its compressors before transmitting the data after the code. If Timing Marks are enabled, the new data stream shall begin with a Timing Mark immediately after the command. See 8.3.2 for additional requirements. | +| (6/14) | [Action Number 3] Increase the volume or gain by one unit ("Immediate Command").
The DCE shall ignore this command while in the Voice Transmit, Receive, and Command States.
For the Voice Duplex State, this command increases the analog source gain by one unit; the DCE shall increase its output gain by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data.
For the Voice Speakerphone State, this command increases the microphone gain by one unit.
See 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 for additional requirements. | + +**Table 12/V.253 – Descriptions of shielded codes sent to the DCE (concluded)** + +| Code | Simple action command description | +|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| (7/3) |

[Action Number 4] Decrease the volume or gain by one unit ("Immediate Command").

The DCE shall ignore this command while in the Voice Transmit, Receive, and Command States.

For the Voice Duplex State, this command decreases the analog source gain by one unit; the DCE shall decrease its output gain by one unit as applicable for the hardware configuration device currently used to send the analog data.

For the Voice Speakerphone State, this command decreases the microphone gain. See 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 for additional requirements.

| +| <^> (5/14) |

[Action Numbers 23 and 25] End Voice Duplex State ("Stream Command"), and End Voice Speakerphone State when +VSP is greater than one ("Stream Command"). The DTE sends this code to signify the end of the duplex voice data transfer, and to return to the Voice Command State. The DCE shall complete the transmission of the contents of its buffer, and shall discard the contents of its receive buffer, before switching to the Voice Command State and returning the OK result code. See 8.3.2 for additional requirements.

| +| ? (3/15) |

[Action Number 14] Transmit Buffer Space Available ("Immediate Command"). The DTE sends this code to inquire about the amount of free space present in the transmit buffer. The DTE shall not send any more voice data until the response is received. The form of the response is: <DLE><X><ASTB=octets available><DLE><. > where <octets available> is the number of octets of free space in the DCE's transmit buffer, and is in decimal. The DCE shall recognize this command while in the Voice Transmit and Command States.

| +| ! (2/1) |

[Action Number 15] Receive abort ("Immediate Command"). The DTE sends this code to signify the end of the voice data reception, and return to the Voice Command State. The DCE shall discard the contents of its buffer, before switching to the Command State and returning the OK result code. The DCE shall recognize this command while in the Voice Receive State.

| +| @ (4/0) | [Action Number 16] Reserved (Transmit CAS tone) | +| % (2/5) | [Action Number 17] Manufacturer specific | +| & (2/6) | [Action Number 18] Manufacturer specific | +| ' (2/7) | [Action Number 19] Manufacturer specific | +| ( (2/8) | [Action Number 20] Manufacturer specific | +| ) (2/9) | [Action Number 21] Manufacturer specific | +| All other T.50 codes | Reserved for future standardization | + +### 8.3.1 Adjusting the volume and gain levels by codes + +#### 8.3.1.1 Non-speakerphone section + +##### 8.3.1.1.1 Voice transmit and voice receive state + +The DCE shall recognize the , and commands while in the Voice Transmit and Voice Receive States. The DCE shall ignore these commands if the volume or gain is already at the range limits. The DTE can query the permitted adjustment range by using the +VGT command (see 10.2.2) and +VGR command (see 10.2.1). The DCE shall ignore the command if Automatic Level Control or Automatic Gain Control (AGC) is active. One unit is manufacturer specific and has the same meaning as in the +VGT and the +VGR commands. + +The DTE shall use the +VGT and the +VGR commands if the DTE wishes to set specific levels. + +##### 8.3.1.1.2 Voice duplex state + +The DCE shall operate according to 8.3.1.1.1 with the following exception. The DCE shall recognize the and commands to adjust the analog sink (e.g. speaker) volume, and recognize the and commands to adjust the analog source (e.g. microphone) gain while in the Voice Duplex State. + +#### 8.3.1.2 Speakerphone section + +While in Voice Speakerphone State, the DCE shall recognize the and commands to adjust the speaker gain, and recognize the and commands to adjust the microphone gain. The DCE shall ignore the respective commands if the microphone or speaker gain is already at the range limits. The DTE can query the permitted adjustment range by using the +VGM command (see 10.5.2) and +VGS command (see 10.5.3). One unit is manufacturer specific and has the same meaning as in the +VGM and the +VGS commands. + +The DTE shall use the +VGM and the +VGS commands to set specific levels. + +### 8.3.2 Pause and resume commands during voice states with DTE to DCE data transfers + +The "DTE to DCE Data Transfer State" is defined as the Voice Transmit State, the Voice Duplex State, and the Voice Speakerphone State (while +VSP is greater than 1). + +The "DCE End Data State" command is defined as follows. For the Voice Transmit State, this command is command. For the Voice Duplex State and the Voice Speakerphone State (+VSP is greater than 1), this command is <^>. + +The "Volume/Gain Adjustment" commands are defined as follows. For the Voice Transmit State, this command is and commands. For the Voice Duplex State and the Voice Speakerphone State (+VSP is greater than 1), these commands are , , , and commands. + +The interaction of the "pause" command (

) and the "resume" commands (, , , and in a different manner, ) function differently from the implied "pause" and "resume" during conditions of a DCE voice transmit buffer underrun (see 10.1.6). When "paused" because of the command, the DCE must receive a "resume" command before: + +- 1) resuming transmitting voice data from the DCE voice transmit buffer to the analog destination; +- 2) begin sending silence (because of no data in the DCE buffer) to the analog destination; or + +- 3) do item 1) if appropriate and leave the Data State in the case of receiving the "DCE End Data State" command. + +When "paused" because of a buffer underrun, the DCE resumes sending voice data to the analog destination immediately upon receiving more data from the DTE, subject to the recommendations prescribed in 10.1.6. + +The DCE shall recognize the

, , , , commands while in the "DTE to DCE Data Transfer State". + +While the DCE is "paused" because of a

command the DCE shall recognize the , "DCE End Data State" command, , , , and commands. The DCE shall ignore

commands when "paused". + +The DTE may use the , "DCE End Data State" command, , or command to move the DCE out of the "paused" operation state. The DCE shall be ready to accept additional DTE voice data immediately (subject to flow control) after receiving a , , or command. The DCE shall not accept additional voice data after receiving a "DCE End Data State" command. The DCE shall ignore commands when not "paused". + +The DCE shall recognize the

, , , and the "Volume/Gain Adjustment" commands in the period between the DTE sending the DCE a "DCE End Data State" command and before the DCE has responded with the OK result code (e.g. the DCE is transmitting the contents of its internal voice transmit buffer). If the DTE sends the DCE a during this period, the DCE shall discard the contents of the DCE internal buffer and leave the Data State. + +The DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer is active (presuming +VIT is non-zero, see 10.2.3) while the DCE is "paused" because of a

command, or a voice transmit buffer underrun. + +NOTE – The DTE is permitted to send more data to the DCE while the DCE is "paused" because of a

command. It is recommended that the DTE take the appropriate precautions to avoid the situation where a deadlock occurs because the DCE has flowed off the DTE, but the DCE cannot proceed until receiving a "resume" command from the DTE. + +# **9 Support commands** + +## **9.1 Action commands** + +### **9.1.1 Dial command in voice (with +FCLASS=8.0)** + +#### **9.1.1.1 ATD** + +This command causes the DCE to dial a phone number. The DCE shall perform an implied +VLS=1 command if +VLS=0 at the time of the **ATD** command. If the +VLS is not equal to zero at the time of the **ATD** command, the DCE shall use the current setting for the dial action. + +NOTE – The DCE may issue unsolicited result codes before going off-hook and issuing the final result code. + +The DCE shall attempt to determine when the remote station has gone off-hook by Ringing Tone detection and disappearance (see the +VRA and the +VRN commands, 10.2.5 and 10.2.6, respectively). Once the DCE has determined that the remote station has gone off-hook, the DCE shall return the OK result code. + +##### 9.1.1.1.1 Result code + +The DCE issues the OK result code when the DCE has determined that the remote station has gone off-hook with high confidence. For example, the DCE reports this result code when the DCE has determined, because the DCE detected an answer tone, that the remote station is a data modem. The DCE may also issue this result code when the DCE has assumed that the remote station has gone off-hook by actions associated with the +VRA (see 10.2.5) and the +VRN (see 10.2.6) commands. + +The DCE issues the NO ANSWER result code when the DCE has continuously detected Ringing Tone for the S7 specified amount of time. + +### 9.1.2 Hangup command in voice (with +FCLASS=8) + +#### 9.1.2.1 ATH + +This command causes the DCE to hang up the phone. In the Voice Mode, this command is equivalent to the +VLS=0 command (see 10.2.4), and a DCE switch to the Data Mode with automatic rate detection; regardless of the state of the +VNH command (see 9.2.5). When the +VNH=0 command is in effect and the DCE is not in the Voice Mode, the ATH command behaves as usual for the Mode. In particular: + +- 1) The ATH command shall force the command +FCLASS=0, but will not change any of the voice parameters, such as +VSM, +VSD, etc. The DTE must re-issue an +FCLASS=8 command to re-enter the Voice State after hanging up the phone. +- 2) The ATH command shall force the command +IPR=0, thus re-enabling automatic rate detection. + +When the +VNH=1 or +VNH=2 command is in effect and the DCE is not in the Voice Mode, the DCE shall issue an OK result code as a result of the ATH command, but the DCE may or may not go on-hook depending on the setting of the +VNH command. See 5.3.2 for additional information on the effect of the +VNH command on reset events. + +As part of the call discrimination algorithm, the DCE may switch to other modes, such as facsimile or data, in order to try handshakes in these modes. See 5.3.2 for a description of the behaviour of the ATH command in the non-voice mode with the +FCLASS, +VLS=1, and +VNH commands. + +NOTE – The Voice Mode does not support the ATH1 command. + +##### 9.1.2.1.1 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the of the command line ATH is non-zero. + +#### 9.1.3 Repeat Caller ID (+VRID) + +#### 9.1.3.1 +VRID= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|---------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | (0,1) for all FCLASS's in those Voice DCEs that support detection of Caller ID | + +This command instructs the DCE to send all available call information on the last incoming call to the DTE. This command allows the DTE to request the information after a call has been answered. This command has one associated value, to choose formatted or unformatted call information text. The value may be 0 or 1. **+VRID** entered without a value is the same as entering the command with value 0. + +The DCE shall return the OK result code after this command is executed; that is, after the requested information text has been sent to the DTE. If no information is available, the OK result code shall be sent to the DTE. + +The parameter of the **+VCID** command (see 9.2.3) is not affected by the **+VRID** command. + +##### 9.1.3.1.1 Subparameter description + +| | Reporting mode | +|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Display Caller ID information in formatted form to the DTE. The DCE shall present the data items in a pair format. The expected pairs are date, time, caller code (telephone number), and name. See 9.2.3.1.3 for a description of formatted form reporting. | +| 1 | Display Caller ID information in unformatted form to the DCE. The DCE shall present the entire packet of information, excluding the leading U's (line seizure information), in T.50 printable numbers. See 9.2.3.1.4 for a description of unformatted form reporting. | + +##### 9.1.3.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +#### 9.1.3.2 +VRID=? + +The form of the response for this command follows. + +**+VRID=?** + +(0,1) + +OK + +## 9.2 Configuration commands + +### 9.2.1 Mode selection + +#### 9.2.1.1 +FCLASS= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------| +| | 0 if Data Mode present, otherwise manufacturer specific. | 8 | + +This command selects a DCE mode – data, facsimile, or voice. The DCE shall recognize the value of 8 as the Voice Mode described in this Recommendation. + +As part of the call discrimination algorithm, the DCE may switch to other modes, such as facsimile or data, in order to try handshakes in these modes. See 5.3.2 for a description of the behaviour of the **+FCLASS** command with the **ATH**, **+VLS=1**, and **+VNH** commands. + +NOTE – The **+FCLASS** command defines subparameter values with embedded "." period characters. + +##### 9.2.1.1.1 Subparameter description + +| | DCE mode | +|--------|-----------------------------------------| +| 0 | Data Mode | +| 1.0 | Service Class 1 (T.31, Facsimile Mode). | +| | | +| 2.0 | Service Class 2 (T.32, Facsimile Mode). | +| 3-7 | Reserved for other Facsimile Modes | +| 8.0 | Enter Voice Record/Playback Mode | +| | | +| 9-16 | Reserved for other Voice Modes | +| 17 | V.70 DSVD Mode | +| 18 | H.324 Videophone Mode | +| 16-255 | Reserved for future standardization | + +##### 9.2.1.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +#### 9.2.2 +FCLASS=? + +The Service Classes available from a DCE are tested by the **+FCLASS=?** command. The response is a string of values, separated by commas, followed by the OK result code; neither bracketing parentheses nor hyphens are permitted. + +Example 1 – The following example illustrates inquiring about DCE's supported Modes. The DCE reports it is capable of Data Mode (i.e. Class 0) functions, Service Class 1 (T.31) and Service Class 2 (T.32) facsimile functions, and Voice Mode functions. DTE originated commands and data are in bold face. + +**AT+FCLASS=?** + +0,1.0,2.0,8.0 + +OK + +### 9.2.3 Caller Id service + +This subclause defines reporting of Caller ID information delivered at the beginning of the call (ICLID). + +#### 9.2.3.1 +VCID= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|---------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| | 0 | (0,1,2) for all FCLASS's in those Voice DCEs that support detection of Caller ID | + +This command controls the reporting and presentation of data associated Caller ID services, where implemented by national Administrations, in the Incoming Call Line ID (ICLID) data format. The ICLID data comes in one of two formats – Single Data Message (SDM) format, or Multiple Data Message (MDM) format. + +The DCE shall report any Caller Id information detected after the first ring. Note that one or more combinations may occur after the RING result code. + +The DCE shall present all data items, found in the **Single Message Format**, contained in the **Single Data Message** (SDM) and in the **Multiple Data Message** (MDM) packets. The DTE can expect, at a minimum, to receive the date, time, and caller code (telephone number). + +The DCE shall present the data items in the = pair format for the formatted and the unformatted presentation modes. Spaces are present on both sides of the equal sign. See Table 13 for the list of defined tags. + +##### 9.2.3.1.1 Subparameter description + +| | Reporting mode | +|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Disable Caller ID reporting | +| 1 | Enable Caller ID with formatted presentation to the DTE. The DCE shall present the data items in a pair format. The expected pairs are date, time, caller code (telephone number), and name. | +| 2 | Enable Caller ID with unformatted presentation to the DCE. The DCE shall present the entire packet of information, excluding the leading U's (line seizure information), in T.50 printable numbers. | + +##### 9.2.3.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +##### 9.2.3.1.3 Formatted form reporting + +The DCE shall not present the Caller Id information if the DCE detects a checksum error in the Caller Id packet (either SDM or MDM) while in this presentation mode. If the DCE receives multiple copies of the Caller Id packets, the DCE shall present one of the correct packets to the DTE. If the DCE has never presented a correct packet, but has received the line seizure information at least once, the DCE shall return =<>. + +The DCE breaks up the presentation of the date and time into two separate pairs for those data items where the date and time appear together. + +**Table 13/V.253 – Caller Id tags for formatted presentation** + +| Tag | Description | +|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| DATE | DATE = MMDD where MM is the month number, 01 through 12, and DD is the day number, 01 through 31. All numbers are in T.50 decimal, and for numbers less than 10, a leading zero character is required. | +| TIME | TIME = HHMM where HH is the hour number, 00 through 23, and MM is the minute number, 00 through 59. All numbers are in T.50 decimal, and for numbers less than 10, a leading zero character is required. | +| NMBR | NMBR = or P or O (T.50 4/15) where is the telephone number of the caller, where P indicates that the calling number information is not available since the originating caller has requested Private service, and where O indicates that the calling number information is not available because the caller is out of area code. | +| NAME | NAME =

where is the subscription listing name | +| MESG | MESG = in printable T.50 (to avoid possible problems with binary output) numbers. This tag indicates a data item not listed above. The message is only possible for Multiple Message Format . | + +In the event of an unrecognized data tag, the DCE shall present the given data item's information as printable hex numbers following the MESG tag. The DCE shall follow the conventions of the Unformatted Form Reporting (defined below) where applicable for the given data item only. See the examples below. The DCE shall include all **Message Type Octet(s)**, **Message Length Octet(s)**, **Data Octet(s)**, and **Checksum Octet(s)**, if found, for the presentation. + +Example 2 – The following example of Formatted Form Reporting illustrates the case where the DCE does not recognize the tag of one given data item from a packet of data items. + +``` + +RING +DATE=0321 +TIME=1405 +NMBR=5045551234 +NAME=DOE JOE +MESG=060342424231 + +RING +RING + +``` + +Example 3 – The following example illustrates Example 2 in the unsolicited response form of the Voice Mode. See 7.1.2 for a description of the form of the packets for unsolicited response data transfers to the DTE. + +``` + + + +DATE=0321 +TIME=1405 +NMBR=5045551234 +NAME=DOE JOE +MESG=060342424231 +<. > + +``` + + + + + +Example 4 – The following example of Formatted Form Reporting illustrates the case where the DCE does not recognize the tag of the packet. + +RING + +MESG=060342424231 + +RING + +RING + +##### 9.2.3.1.4 Unformatted form reporting + +The DCE shall present all data items and packet control information, found in the **Single Message Format**, contained in the **Single Data Message (SDM)** and in the **Multiple Data Message (MDM)** packets. The DCE shall, however, exclude the leading U's (line seizure information) from the presentation. The DCE shall include the checksum in the presentation. The DCE shall present the entire Caller Id packet in hex as printable numbers. The T.50 characters in the hex message shall be in the bit order presented to the DCE. The DCE shall not insert spaces, , or T.50 codes, for formatting, between the characters of the packet. + +The DCE shall not check the checksum, and it is the responsibility of the DTE to check the validity of the message(s). Note that this means that the DCE will present the Caller Id information even if the DCE detects a checksum error in the Caller Id packet (either SDM or MDM) while in this presentation mode. If the DCE receives multiple copies of the Caller Id packets, the DCE shall present all of the packets to the DTE. + +The DCE shall present all information contained in the packet in hex as T.50 printable characters. The DCE shall include all **Message Type Octet(s)**, **Message Length Octet(s)**, **Data Octet(s)**, and **Checksum Octet(s)** for the presentation. + +Example 5 – The following example illustrates Unformatted Form Reporting. + +RING + +MESG=0412303332313134303539313435353132333435 + +RING + +RING + +### 9.2.4 DID service + +#### 9.2.4.1 +VDID=, + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|-----------|-----------------------|-----------------------| +| | 0 | 0 | +| | Manufacturer specific | Manufacturer specific | + +This command controls the setting and reporting of data associated with DID-type services. + +The report is one line having the form: + +NDID= + +The character is optional. + +The shielded version of these messages (DCE in Voice Mode) is described in 7.1.2. + +##### 9.2.4.1.1 Subparameter description + +: This subparameter is the maximum number of digits (DTMF, MF, etc.) the DCE may report after notification of an incoming call by the Telco. The DTE may request that the DCE present no digits (assuming the DCE is capable of reporting DID information) by setting this subparameter to zero. The DCE shall end the DID report presenting the number of digits specified in the subparameter. + +: This subparameter is the time interval to wait after the last DCE presented DID digit to wait before assuming that there is no more DID information to follow, and ending the DID digit report. The actual range is manufacturer-specific range in units of 0.01 seconds. The value of zero for this subparameter may have unspecified results. + +##### 9.2.4.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if either the or if any of the subparameters are out of range. + +### 9.2.5 Automatic hangup control + +#### 9.2.5.1 +VNH= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|--------|---------|-----------| +| | 0 | 0,1 | + +This command causes the DCE to enable or disable automatic hangups to a varying degree in the data and facsimile modes. This command is part of a possible DTE call discrimination operation. See 5.3.2 for the main description of the behaviour of the +VNH command, and its interaction with the +FCLASS, and ATH commands. See 5.3.1 for the additional features necessary for call discrimination. + +The DTE uses this command by selecting a non-zero +VNH setting; this setting becomes effective immediately after the DCE response. The setting remains across a +FCLASS Mode switch. The +VNH setting resets to zero when: + +- 1) the DTE uses a +VNH command to change the setting; +- 2) the DTE commands another +FCLASS Mode change without first issuing another +VNH command; +- 3) a reset event occurs as listed in 5.3.2; or +- 4) the DCE receives a +VIP command. + +##### 9.2.5.1.1 Subparameter description + +| | Hook control description | +|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | The DCE retains automatic hangups as is normal in the other modes (such as hanging up the phone when the DCE does not detect a data carrier within a given time interval). | +| 1 | The DCE shall disable automatic hangups usually found in the other non-Voice Modes | +| 2 | The DCE shall disable automatic hangups in the other non-Voice Modes. The DCE shall only perform a "logical" hangup (return the OK result code). | +| 3-255 | Reserved for future standardization | + +##### 9.2.5.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +## 9.3 Miscellaneous AT commands + +### 9.3.1 S-parameters + +#### 9.3.1.1 ATSn= + +This command will set the Sn parameter to . The DCE will set the nth parameter to zero if no is present. These parameters are common to the data, facsimile, and voice modes, unless explicitly stated otherwise as part of another Recommendation, e.g. Service Class 2.0. + +#### 9.3.1.2 ATSn? + +The DCE returns a single line of information text. For the Voice Mode, this text shall consist of exactly three characters, giving the value of the S-parameter in decimal, with leading zeros included. + +#### 9.3.2 ATZ + +This command causes the DCE to reset the DCE to the Data Mode (+FCLASS=0), to set all of the data mode parameters to their default values as in Recommendation V.250 (ex-V.25 *ter*), and to enable automatic rate detection (+IPR=0). See 6.4.6 for details about implementations without a Data Mode. + +# 10 Voice commands + +## 10.1 Action commands + +### 10.1.1 Initialize voice parameters + +#### 10.1.1.1 +VIP (optionally +VIP=) + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|-----|---------|-----------| +| | 0 | 0 | + +This command causes the DCE to initialize all the Voice parameters to the manufacturer-determined default settings. This command has no effect on the +FCLASS setting, and has the same effect as if the DTE had issued individual parameter setting commands. + +Manufacturers may optionally provide a selection of default profiles, chosen by the parameter. + +##### 10.1.1.1.1 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +### 10.1.2 Ring local phone + +#### 10.1.2.1 +VRL=[,[,]...] + +This command is optional. This command causes the DCE to produce ringing voltage to the attached local phone. The command returns the OK result code immediately if all subparameters are found to be properly formatted; the actual production of ringing occurs "asynchronously". No separate + +indication is given to the DTE when the specified ring pattern has been completed. If the local phone is off-hook, then the ringing is not performed (although an OK result code is still produced); if the local phone goes off-hook during the ringing, then ring voltage is terminated and the remainder of the ringing is not performed (the DTE is informed of the local phone off-hook condition through the event report defined in Table 10). + +##### 10.1.2.1.1 Subparameter description + +The **+VRL** command can accept a variable number of subparameters. All subparameters are decimal values in the range 0 to 255, each in increments of 100 milliseconds. The first subparameter indicates the duration of the first ringing segment of the ring pattern; the second subparameter, if present, indicates the duration of the silent period before the next segment of the ring pattern; the third subparameter indicates the duration of the second ringing segment; and so forth, alternatively specifying the duration of the ring and silence segment. Note that it is not necessary to indicate the amount of silence that follows the pattern separating it from the next pattern; it is the responsibility of the DTE to repeat the command (at, typically, 6 second intervals) if additional ring patterns are desired. + +The DCE shall support subparameter strings specifying a minimum of three `` subparameters; more may be supported. + +##### 10.1.2.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall issue the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the DCE encountered an error in parsing the subparameters or if a subparameter value is outside the supported range. + +###### Examples + +Example 6 – The following example illustrates the use of the **+VRL** command. The following execution of **+VRL** will produce a standard 2-second ring. Issuing such commands at 6-second intervals would generate the normal North American ring cadence. + +**+VRL=20** + +Example 7 – The following example illustrates the use of the **+VRL** command. The following execution of **+VRL** will produce a "double-ring" pattern (800 milliseconds of ringing, 400 milliseconds of silence, 800 milliseconds of ringing). + +**+VRL=8,4,8** + +###### Test Syntax + +The general format of the information text is: + +`().(),` + +where `` indicates the supported values for the `` subparameters, `` indicates the supported values for the `` subparameters, and `` indicates the number of `` subparameters that can appear in a single **+VRL** command (the `` subparameters are presumed to be separated by `` subparameters). + +If the DCE does not support generation of ringing on the local phone, the information text returned is: + +(0),(0),0 + +The information text response: + +(0-255),(0-255),3 + +indicates that the DCE supports the full range of values for both and subparameters, and the minimum three subparameters per string. + +### 10.1.3 Voice receive state + +#### 10.1.3.1 +VRX (optionally +VRX=) + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|-----|---------|-----------| +| | 0 | 0 | + +This command causes the DCE to start the voice reception process. + +The DCE begins the voice receive mode by returning the CONNECT result code to the DTE. After this report, the DCE sends shielded (described in 6.3.7) voice data to the DTE. See Table 12 for the list of possible action commands during a voice receive. The DCE shall send the voice data in the format previously selected by the +VSM command. + +This Recommendation provides for two ways to leave the Voice Receive State: + +- 1) a ; and +- 2) a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out. + +The DCE shall inform the DTE, via codes, about pertinent events during the voice receive, such as "Presumed End of Message" (QUIET) and "Presumed Hangup" (SILENCE) detected, BUSY detected, and DIALTONE detected, so that, at the discretion of the DTE, the DTE may terminate the Voice Receive State. See Table 11 for a list of possible event determinations and associated shielded event reports. + +On termination of the Voice Receive State, the DCE shall append a character pair (padding out to an octet boundary may be necessary), followed by the OK result code. The DCE shall return to Voice Command State. + +The DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer is in effect while the receive operation is in progress. If the DTE wishes to use this timer and stop the DCE from performing unwanted restarts, the DTE must assure that there are data sent from the DTE to the DCE often enough to refresh the timer; the DTE may use the shielded code as a no-operation command to refresh the timer. + +The permitted +VLS pre-assigned indices for this command are given in Table 15. + +##### 10.1.3.1.1 Subparameter description + +| | Rx Operation | +|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 | Voice receive operation described above. This selection does not provide for DCE periodical tone production during a voice receive operation.

NOTE – This Recommendation presumes that the DTE shall issue the proper notifications of a record operation in progress by message playbacks to satisfy possible legal requirements. | +| 1 | Voice receive operation described above. This selection does provide for DCE periodical tone production during a voice receive operation. The tone frequency and cadence is manufacturer specific. | +| 2-127 | Reserved for future standardization | +| 128-255 | Manufacturer specific | + +##### 10.1.3.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return this result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the DCE is not connected to the off-hook Telco line, or one non-Telco input device. + +##### 10.1.3.1.3 DCE event report capabilities + +For a given +VSM setting, the DCE shall report the events given by the subparameter of the +VLS=? Command (see 10.2.4.2) corresponding to the current +VLS setting. + +### 10.1.4 Voice duplex state + +In general, this Data State is a concatenation of the Voice Transmit State and the Voice Receive State. Note that this Voice Duplex State uses the Non-speakerphone section of the model Voice DCE (see clause 4 for a description of the DCE model). + +![Block diagram of the +VTR command architecture showing DCE and DTE components.](c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg) + +The diagram illustrates the architecture for the +VTR command, divided into DCE (Data Circuit-terminating Equipment) and DTE (Data Terminal Equipment) sections by a horizontal line. + +**DCE Section:** + +- At the top, three boxes are connected in series: "LEC (not used)", "AGC (not used)", and "AEC (not used)". +- Below these, two boxes labeled "Analog voice data" are shown, one on each side of the central interface block. +- The central block is labeled "+V command parser and DCE/DTE interface (for the +VTR mode, the DTE selects the analog source and sink through the +VLS command; the selections can be microphone and speaker or PSTN)". +- On the left, a line labeled "PSTN" enters the central block. +- On the right, two lines labeled "Speaker" and "Microphone" exit the central block. + +**DTE Section:** + +- Below the horizontal line, a box labeled "Duplex digital voice data" is on the left, and a box labeled "Event reports" is on the right. +- Below these, a large box is labeled "+V DTE control and DCE/DTE interface Note that the DTE always sends and receives digitized voice data". +- At the bottom, a box is labeled "Producer and consumer of digitized voice data". + +Vertical lines connect the "Analog voice data" boxes to the "Duplex digital voice data" box, and the "Event reports" box to the "+V DTE control..." box. The "Producer and consumer..." box is connected to the "+V DTE control..." box. + +Block diagram of the +VTR command architecture showing DCE and DTE components. + +T1605200-98 + +**Figure 2/V.253 – +VTR command** + +#### 10.1.4.1 +VTR + +This command causes the DCE to start the voice transmission and reception process. The DCE is not required to perform any Acoustic Echo Cancellation nor any Line Echo Cancellation. + +The DCE begins the Voice Duplex State by returning the CONNECT result code to the DTE. After this report, the DCE sends shielded (described in 6.3.7) voice data to the DTE, and the DTE can send the shielded (described in 6.3.7) voice data. See Table 12 for the list of possible action commands during a voice receive. The DCE shall send the voice data in the format previously selected by the +VSM command. + +It is recommended that the DCE hold some portion of the voice data, when first starting the Voice Duplex State, before actually transmitting the data over to the analog destination. It is recommended that the DCE shall also delay voice data transfers from the DCE to the DTE by an equal amount. + +The DCE shall accept data from the DTE and emit data to the DTE in the format previously selected by the +VSM (see 10.2.8) command, and use the flow control method selected by the +IFC command. + +Gaps in the voice data stream from the DTE to the DCE shall not cause the DCE to terminate the Voice Duplex State. The DCE may perform any synchronization necessary with the DCE to DTE data flow. + +The DTE shall signal the termination of the voice data stream by appending a command and padding out to an octet boundary if necessary (Table 12). The DCE shall issue the character pair (thereby ending the DCE to DTE voice data flow) followed by the OK result code, and return to the command mode after the DCE has completely transmitted the contents of its buffer. Note that in the period between the DTE has sent the DCE a <^> command and + +before the DCE has responded with the OK result code, the DTE may issue a limited number of simple commands (i.e. ). See Table 12 and 8.3.2. + +This Recommendation provides for two ways to leave the Voice Duplex State: + +- 1) a <^> shielded code; and +- 2) a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out. + +Item 1) is the DTEs initiated means of terminating the Voice Duplex State, and item 2) is a DCE-initiated means of terminating the Voice Duplex State. After termination of the Data State, the DCE shall enter the Voice Command State. + +Note that the DCE shall not leave the Voice Duplex State upon receiving a command or a command, and shall ignore the aforementioned commands. The use of these commands to transition to half-duplex states is for further study. + +The permitted +VLS pre-assigned indices for this command are given in Table 15. + +#### 10.1.4.2 DCE event report capabilities + +For a given +VSM setting, the DCE shall report the events given by the bitwise OR'ing of and subparameters of the +VLS=? Command (see 10.2.4.2) corresponding to the current +VLS setting. + +#### 10.1.4.3 Result code + +The DCE shall return the CONNECT result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the DCE is not connected to at least one off-hook Duplex PSTN line, or one Duplex non-PSTN device. + +### 10.1.5 DTMF and tone generation in voice + +#### 10.1.5.1 +VTS= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|----------|-------------|-----------------------| +| | Null string | DTMF and single tones | + +This command causes the DCE to produce DTMF tones, single frequency tones, and optionally, double frequency tones. This command allows the DTE to generate dialtones, busy, etc. for those DCEs capable of generating two arbitrary tones. + +The DCE may perform tone detection during the playing of tones. The DCE shall accept the to abort the playing of the tones, return the OK result code, and return to the Voice Command State. + +The DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer is in effect while the tone production operation is in progress. If the DTE wishes to use this timer and stop the DCE from performing unwanted restarts, the DTE must assure that there are data sent from the DTE to the DCE often enough to refresh the timer; the DTE may use the shielded code as a no-operation command to refresh the timer. + +The DCE's support for the second tone generation is optional. + +The DCE shall produce compliant DTMF tones when processing DTMF tone production codes. The DCE need not produce compliant DTMF tones when producing two tones, even if the frequencies are correct for a given DTMF tone. + +##### 10.1.5.1.1 Subparameter description + +The tone generation string shall consist of elements in a list where each element is separated by commas. Each element can be: + +- 1) a single character in the set, 0-9, #, \*, !, and A-D; +- 2) a string drawn from the set but not including ! enclosed in square brackets, "[ ]"; or +- 3) a string enclosed in curly braces. "{ }". + +The DCE shall interpret item 1), a single character, as a DTMF digit except for ! as a hookflash with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. The DCE shall interpret item 2), quantity in the square brackets, as a general dual tone and duration selection. The DCE shall interpret item 3), quantity in the curly braces, as a DTMF tone or hookflash with a different duration than that given by the **+VTD** command. + +Missing subparameters assume the default value. Unspecified values always default to zero for frequencies, DTMF \* for DTMF tones, and **+VTD** for duration. The omission of commas (and associated subparameters) is valid. + +The quantity in the square brackets consists of a three-element list. The first element is the first frequency, the second element is the second frequency, and the third element is the duration in 0.01 second intervals. A list may contain null elements. For example [3000] means that the DCE generates a single tone at 3000 Hz for the default duration, [3000,3300] means that the DCE generates a dual tone at 3000 and 3300 Hz for the default duration, and [,3300] means that the DCE generates a single tone at 3300 Hz for the default duration. + +The quantity in the curly braces consists of a two-element list. The first element is the DTMF tone or hookflash (!) character, and the second element is the duration in 0.01 seconds. The characters are of the same set given above. A list may contain null elements. For example, {2} means DTMF tone "2" for the default duration, and {} means silence for the default duration. + +The DCE shall stop the tone generation at the point in the string where the DCE detects a parsing error, encounters an invalid frequency range, encounters a , or encounters a semi-colon. + +##### 10.1.5.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the DCE encountered an error in parsing the subparameter, or if a selected frequency is out of range. + +Example 8 – The following example illustrates tone generation without using any null elements. The table, following the example of the tone generation command, illustrates the DCE execution of the command. + +AT+VTS= {!, 30}, 1, 2, [1000, 1300, 50], !, {\*, 6}, [800, 1300, 50], 9 + +- 1) Hookflash with a duration of 300 ms. +- 2) Play DTMF 1 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 3) Play DTMF 2 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 4) Play tone pair at 1000 Hz and 1300 Hz with a duration of 500 ms. +- 5) Hookflash with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 6) Play DTMF \* with a duration of 60 ms. +- 7) Play tone pair at 800 Hz and 1300 Hz with a duration of 500 ms. +- 8) Play DTMF 9 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. + +Example 9 – The following example illustrates tone generation using null elements. The table, following the example of the tone generation command, illustrates the DCE execution of the command. + +AT+VTS=1, 2, [1000, 1300, 50], [800], 9 + +- 1) Play DTMF 1 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 2) Play DTMF 2 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 3) Play tone pair at 1000 Hz and 1300 Hz with a duration of 500 ms. +- 4) Play tone pair at 800 Hz with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 5) Play DTMF 9 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. + +Example 10 – The following example illustrates tone generation using null elements and periods of silence. The table, following the example of the tone generation command, illustrates the DCE execution of the command. + +AT+VTS=1, [, , 50], 2, [], 9 + +- 1) Play DTMF 1 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 2) Play silence with a duration of 500 ms. +- 3) Play DTMF 2 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 4) Play silence with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. +- 5) Play DTMF 9 with a duration given by the **+VTD** command. + +#### 10.1.5.2 +VTS=? + +The form of the response for this command follows. + +**+VTS=?** + +,, + +where the , , and the subparameters comprise a (see 6.3.3.4.3). The OK result code follows the string. + +##### 10.1.5.2.1 Subparameter description + +Zeros are implied in the **+VTS=?** response for the frequencies, even if the DCE does report the zeros. The DCE must support a non-zero parameter. + +: First frequency range. + +: Second frequency range. + +: Duration range for the square brackets and curly braces constructs. The units are in 0.01 seconds. The range of the permitted values for the **+VTD** command (see 10.2.9) shall be inclusive within the range of the subparameter. + +Example 11 – The following example illustrates inquiring about the DCE support of this command. The DCE reports that the DCE supports two frequencies, both in the range 200 to 3300 Hz, and supports a duration range from 0 to 5 seconds. DTE originated commands and data are in bold face. + +**AT+VTS=?** + +(200-3300), (200-3300), (0-500) + +OK + +Example 12 – The following example illustrates inquiring about the DCE support of this command. The DCE reports that the DCE supports one frequency in the range 200 to 3300, and supports a duration range from 0 to 5 seconds. DTE originated commands and data are in bold face. + +**AT+VTS=?** + +(200-3300) , (0) , (0-500) + +OK + +### 10.1.6 Transmit data state + +#### 10.1.6.1 +VTX + +This command causes the DCE to start the voice transmission process. + +The DTE can send the shielded (described in 6.3.7) voice data after the DTE receives the CONNECT result code. See Table 12 for the list of simple action commands defined during a voice transmit. + +It is recommended that the DCE hold some portion of the voice data, when first starting the voice transmit mode, before actually transmitting the data over to the analog destination. The DCE accepts data from the DTE in the format previously selected by the +VSM (see 10.2.8) command, and uses the flow control method selected by the +IFC command. + +Gaps in the voice data stream from the DTE to the DCE shall not cause the DCE to terminate the Voice Transmit State. It is recommended that the voice data is buffered by the DCE in such a fashion as to withstand gaps of missing data from the DTE. This Recommendation does not mandate a minimum DCE transmit buffer size. If the DCE does have any current voice data, the DCE shall send silence over to the analog destination until the DTE provides more voice data. It is recommended that the DCE hold some portion of the voice data, when re-starting the voice transmit, before actually transmitting the data over to the analog destination. + +The DTE shall signal the termination of the voice data stream by appending a command and padding out to an octet boundary if necessary (Table 12). The DCE shall issue the OK result code and return to the command mode after the DCE has completely transmitted the contents of its buffer. Note that in the period between the DTE has sent the DCE a command and before the DCE has responded with the OK result code, the DTE may issue a limited number of simple commands (i.e. ). See Table 12 and 8.3.2. + +This Recommendation provides for two ways to leave the Voice Transmit State: + +- 1) a shielded code; and +- 2) a DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer time-out. + +Item 1) is the DTE-initiated means of terminating the Voice Transmit State, and item 2) is a DCE-initiated means of terminating the Voice Transmit State. After termination of the Data State, the DCE shall enter the Voice Command State. + +The permitted +VLS pre-assigned indices for this command are given in Table 15. + +##### 10.1.6.1.1 Result code + +The DCE shall return the CONNECT result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the DCE is not connected to at least one off-hook Telco line, or one non-Telco device. + +##### 10.1.6.1.2 DCE event report capabilities + +For a given +VSM setting, the DCE shall report the events given by the subparameter of the +VLS=? Command (see 10.2.4.2) in accordance with the current +VLS setting. + +## 10.2 Action controls (configuration command) + +### 10.2.1 Receive gain selection + +#### 10.2.1.1 +VGR= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|--------|----------|-----------| +| | 0 or 128 | 0 or 128 | + +This command causes the DCE to set the gain for the received voice samples. + +##### 10.2.1.1.1 Subparameter description + +The receive gain is an unsigned octet where values larger than 128 indicate a larger gain than nominal, and values smaller than 128 indicate a gain smaller than nominal. The nominal value is 128. The largest range of numbers is 0 to 255. The DCE may limit the receive gain to a more narrow range, such as 120 to 136 or 120 to 128. The value of zero is reserved for DCE Automatic Gain Control (AGC). + +##### 10.2.1.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +### 10.2.2 Volume selection + +#### 10.2.2.1 +VGT= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|---------|----------|-----------| +| | 0 or 128 | 0 or 128 | + +This command causes the DCE to set the volume level, either by amplifying or attenuating the signal, for the transmitted voice samples. + +##### 10.2.2.1.1 Subparameter description + +The transmit gain (or attenuation) is an unsigned octet where values larger than 128 indicate a larger gain than nominal, and values smaller than 128 indicate a smaller gain (or larger attenuation) than nominal. The nominal value is 128. The largest range of numbers is 0 to 255. The DCE may use a more narrow range, such as 120 to 136 or 120 to 128. The value of zero is reserved for DCE Automatic Volume Control (AVC). + +##### 10.2.2.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +### 10.2.3 DTE/DCE inactivity timer + +#### 10.2.3.1 +VIT= + +| | Default | Mandatory | +|---------|---------|-----------| +| | 0 | 0 | + +This command sets the DCE's initial value for the DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer. See 6.4.5 for a description of the DTE/DCE Inactivity Timer. + +##### 10.2.3.1.1 Subparameter description + +The permitted timer range is given by the +VIT=? command. The units are in 1.0 seconds. The DTE can disable the Inactivity Timer by using a value of zero. + +##### 10.2.3.1.2 Result code + +The DCE shall return the OK result code if the DCE accepts the command. The DCE shall return the ERROR result code if the subparameter is out of range. + +### 10.2.4 Analogue source/destination selection + +#### 10.2.4.1 +VLS=