GeniusHTX commited on
Commit
d7dbf45
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1c67d2b

Upload 2 files

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +81 -0
  2. swe_skills_bench.jsonl +0 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ dataset_info:
3
+ features:
4
+ - name: skill_id
5
+ dtype: string
6
+ - name: name
7
+ dtype: string
8
+ - name: description
9
+ dtype: string
10
+ - name: type
11
+ dtype: string
12
+ - name: task_prompt
13
+ dtype: string
14
+ - name: skill_document
15
+ dtype: string
16
+ - name: test_code
17
+ dtype: string
18
+ - name: repo_url
19
+ dtype: string
20
+ - name: repo_commit
21
+ dtype: string
22
+ - name: docker_image
23
+ dtype: string
24
+ splits:
25
+ - name: train
26
+ num_examples: 49
27
+ configs:
28
+ - config_name: default
29
+ data_files:
30
+ - split: train
31
+ path: swe_skills_bench.jsonl
32
+ language:
33
+ - en
34
+ license: mit
35
+ task_categories:
36
+ - text-generation
37
+ tags:
38
+ - code
39
+ - software-engineering
40
+ - benchmark
41
+ - agents
42
+ - skill-injection
43
+ pretty_name: SWE-Skills-Bench
44
+ size_categories:
45
+ - n<1K
46
+ ---
47
+
48
+ **Dataset Summary**
49
+
50
+ SWE-Skills-Bench is a benchmark dataset for evaluating whether injected skill documents — structured packages of procedural knowledge — measurably improve LLM agent performance on real-world software engineering tasks.
51
+
52
+ The dataset contains 49 skills spanning 565 task instances across six software engineering domains (Deployment & DevOps, Analytics & Monitoring, API Development, Data Science & ML, Security & Testing, and Developer Tools). Each skill is grounded in an authentic GitHub repository at a fixed commit, paired with a curated skill document and a deterministic pytest test suite that encodes the task's acceptance criteria.
53
+
54
+ The dataset is designed to answer: *Does giving an agent a skill document actually help?* The primary evaluation metric is pytest pass rate, measured under two conditions — with and without skill injection — to compute a pass-rate delta (ΔP) per skill.
55
+
56
+ The dataset was released as part of [SWE-Skills-Bench: Do Agent Skills Actually Help in Real-World Software Engineering?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15401)
57
+
58
+ **Dataset Structure**
59
+
60
+ An example of a SWE-Skills-Bench datum is as follows:
61
+
62
+ ```
63
+ skill_id: (str) - Unique skill identifier, e.g. "fix", "tdd-workflow".
64
+ name: (str) - Human-readable task name.
65
+ description: (str) - One-line description of the task.
66
+ type: (str) - Task category, e.g. "repair", "feature", "fix".
67
+ task_prompt: (str) - Full task prompt passed to the agent (Markdown).
68
+ skill_document: (str) - Curated skill document injected as agent context (Markdown).
69
+ test_code: (str) - Pytest test suite used to evaluate the agent's output.
70
+ repo_url: (str) - Target GitHub repository URL.
71
+ repo_commit: (str) - Fixed commit hash for reproducibility.
72
+ docker_image: (str) - Pre-configured Docker image for the evaluation environment.
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ **Supported Tasks**
76
+
77
+ SWE-Skills-Bench proposes a paired evaluation task: given a task prompt (with or without an injected skill document), an agent must complete a software engineering task on a real codebase. Correctness is verified by running the associated pytest test suite inside a Docker container.
78
+
79
+ **Languages**
80
+
81
+ The text of the dataset is in English.
swe_skills_bench.jsonl ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff