Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -12,6 +12,20 @@ This dataset is the official release of the benchmark introduced in the paper
|
|
| 12 |
The dataset will be released in phases. Each subset will be manually reviewed before being progressively opened to the public.<br>
|
| 13 |
Currently released subset: <br>CHAOS (CN).
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
---
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
## 📁 Dataset Directory Structure
|
|
@@ -103,7 +117,7 @@ Each turn of QA contains the following fields (example):
|
|
| 103 |
## Citation
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
If you find this work useful or use this dataset in your research, please cite our paper.
|
| 106 |
-
*Note: The paper has been accepted at BIBM 2025 and is to appear; final publication details (e.g., pages/DOI) will be updated upon release.*
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
```bibtex
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
The dataset will be released in phases. Each subset will be manually reviewed before being progressively opened to the public.<br>
|
| 13 |
Currently released subset: <br>CHAOS (CN).
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
---
|
| 16 |
+
## Abstract
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Multi-turn reasoning segmentation is essential for mimicking real-world clinical workflows,
|
| 19 |
+
where anatomical structures are identified through step-by-step dialogue based on spatial,
|
| 20 |
+
functional, or pathological descriptions. However, the lack of a dedicated benchmark in this area has limited progress.
|
| 21 |
+
To address this gap, we introduce the first bilingual benchmark for multi-turn medical image segmentation, supporting both Chinese and English dialogues.
|
| 22 |
+
The benchmark consists of 28,904 images, 113,963 segmentation masks, and 232,188 question–answer pairs, covering major organs and anatomical systems across CT
|
| 23 |
+
and MRI modalities. Each dialogue requires the model to infer the segmentation target based on prior conversational turns
|
| 24 |
+
and previously segmented regions. We evaluate several state-of-the-art models, including MedCLIP-SAM, LISA, and LISA++,
|
| 25 |
+
and report three key findings: (1) existing models perform poorly on our benchmark, far below clinical usability standards;
|
| 26 |
+
(2) performance degrades as dialogue turns increase, reflecting limited multi-turn reasoning capabilities; and (3) general-purpose models such as LISA
|
| 27 |
+
can outperform medical-specific models, suggesting that further integration of domain knowledge is needed for specialized medical applications.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
---
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
## 📁 Dataset Directory Structure
|
|
|
|
| 117 |
## Citation
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
If you find this work useful or use this dataset in your research, please cite our paper.
|
| 120 |
+
**Note: The paper has been accepted at BIBM 2025 and is to appear; final publication details (e.g., pages/DOI) will be updated upon release.**
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
```bibtex
|