"""Reference scoring implementation for asmachta.json. Verifies that a model's claimed quotes actually appear in the source document -- the same method used to produce this dataset's own `verified` / `verification_method` fields (see README, "Support sentences: how grounding works"). No dependencies beyond the standard library. Expected model output format, one claim per line: 1. [] 2. [] Usage as a library: from score import parse_claims, score_answer claims = parse_claims(model_output_text) result = score_answer(claims, record["source_text"]) print(result["precision"], result["claims"]) Usage as a script (demo against the dataset's own reference answers, which should score at or near 100% grounded since they are the source of the verified attribution spans): python3 score.py asmachta.json """ from __future__ import annotations import difflib import json import re import sys CLAIM_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*\d+\.\s*(.+?)\s*\[(.+?)\]\s*$", re.MULTILINE) # Fallback for output where the model prefixed the numbered claim with # leftover text on the same line (e.g. reasoning-model self-talk, or a # stray closing tag never on its own line) -- CLAIM_RE's line # anchor then finds nothing even though a real, checkable quote is # right there. This pattern doesn't require the claim to start at the # beginning of a line, only that "N." is immediately followed by claim # text and a bracketed quote. Only used as a fallback: if CLAIM_RE finds # anything at all, its output is used unchanged, so this never changes # scoring for output that was already parsing correctly. CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK = re.compile(r"(?:^|\.)?\s*\d+\.\s*(.+?)\s*\[([^\[\]]{3,})\]", re.MULTILINE) # Same 0.94 similarity threshold this dataset's own offset-validation # pipeline used for near-exact (whitespace/punctuation-level) matches. FUZZY_THRESHOLD = 0.94 def parse_claims(text: str) -> list[dict]: """Extract (claim, quote) pairs from `N. claim [quote]`-formatted text. Tries the strict, line-anchored pattern first; only falls back to a more permissive pattern if that finds nothing at all. This recovers real quotes hidden behind formatting noise without changing the result for output that already parses cleanly -- see CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK. """ matches = CLAIM_RE.findall(text) if not matches: matches = CLAIM_RE_FALLBACK.findall(text) return [{"text": m[0].strip(), "quote": m[1].strip()} for m in matches] def _normalize(s: str) -> str: return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", s).strip() def verify_quote(quote: str, source_text: str) -> dict: """Check whether `quote` appears in `source_text`, exact/normalized/fuzzy.""" if quote in source_text: return {"verified": True, "method": "exact", "score": 1.0} if _normalize(quote) in _normalize(source_text): return {"verified": True, "method": "normalized_space", "score": 1.0} sm = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, source_text, quote, autojunk=False) match = sm.find_longest_match(0, len(source_text), 0, len(quote)) if match.size == 0: return {"verified": False, "method": "fuzzy", "score": 0.0} pad = len(quote) - match.size window = source_text[max(0, match.a - pad): min(len(source_text), match.a + match.size + pad)] ratio = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, _normalize(window), _normalize(quote)).ratio() return {"verified": ratio >= FUZZY_THRESHOLD, "method": "fuzzy", "score": ratio} def score_answer(claims: list[dict], source_text: str) -> dict: """Score a list of {"text", "quote"} claims against a source document. Returns per-claim verification results plus overall attribution precision (grounded claims / total claims). """ scored = [] grounded = 0 for c in claims: v = verify_quote(c["quote"], source_text) scored.append({**c, **v}) if v["verified"]: grounded += 1 n = len(claims) return { "n_claims": n, "n_grounded": grounded, "precision": grounded / n if n else None, "claims": scored, } def score_model_output(text: str, source_text: str) -> dict: """End-to-end: parse a raw model response and score it against a document.""" return score_answer(parse_claims(text), source_text) def _demo(dataset_path: str) -> None: with open(dataset_path, encoding="utf-8") as f: records = json.load(f) # `reference_answer` is plain prose -- the dataset's own claim/quote # structure lives in `claims[].attribution[]`, not embedded as # "N. claim [quote]" text. Re-verify verify_quote() against that # structure directly, for the first 5 answerable records: this # should reproduce every `verified: true` the dataset already ships. print("Re-verifying this file's own claims[].attribution[] spans with") print("verify_quote() (sanity check -- should match every 'verified' field):\n") shown = 0 for r in records: if r["difficulty"] == 0: continue n = sum(len(c["attribution"]) for c in r["claims"]) agree = 0 for c in r["claims"]: for a in c["attribution"]: v = verify_quote(a["source_excerpt"], r["source_text"]) if v["verified"] == a["verified"]: agree += 1 print(f" {r['id']}: {agree}/{n} spans match the dataset's own 'verified' label") shown += 1 if shown >= 5: break print("\nScoring a MODEL's raw output (the 'N. claim [quote]' format from") print("the README) against a source document -- a fabricated example, one") print("real claim and one hallucinated claim:") r = next(r for r in records if r["difficulty"] != 0) real_excerpt = r["claims"][0]["attribution"][0]["source_excerpt"] fake_output = ( f"1. טענה אמיתית שנתמכת במסמך. [{real_excerpt}]\n" f"2. משהו שלא נכתב במסמך כלל ולעולם לא יימצא שם. [ציטוט מומצא שלא קיים]" ) result = score_model_output(fake_output, r["source_text"]) print(f" {result['n_grounded']}/{result['n_claims']} claims grounded " f"(precision={result['precision']:.2f})") if __name__ == "__main__": if len(sys.argv) != 2: print(f"Usage: python3 {sys.argv[0]} asmachta.json", file=sys.stderr) sys.exit(1) _demo(sys.argv[1])